The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 12 17 CC[a ea# 4 44dja City Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday December 17, 2002 2:00 p.m. Beginning Resolution. No. 2002-164 Ordinance. No. 380 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Council Members: Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Adolph PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CLOSED SESSION - None NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, persons identified as negotiating parties, do not attend the closed session when the City is considering acquisition of real property. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE RECONVENE 3:00 P.M. V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Pni qo City Council Agenda Page 1 December 17, 2002 When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS Vill. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE - None IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 3, 2002. X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1 . APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED DECEMBER 17, 2002. 2. APPROVAL OF THE TREASURER'S REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2002. 3. APPROVAL OF THE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2002. 4. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL CONTINUING DISCLOSURE FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 2000-01 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR END JUNE 30, 2002. 5. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL DISTRICT INFORMATION SHEETS FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NOS. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 AND 97-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR END JUNE 30, 2002. 6. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ATTEND THE 2003 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (GFOA) ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN NEW YORK, N.Y., MAY 18-21, 2003. 7. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PREPARE THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE (PS&E) FOR THE ADAMS STREET AT WESTWARD HO DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT, PROJECT NO. 2002-06. City Council Agenda Page 2 December 17, 2002 O n t 8. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNING COMMISSION TO UTILIZE THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON FEBRUARY 5, APRIL 2, JUNE 11, AUGUST 6, OCTOBER 8, AND DECEMBER 3, 2003 FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. 9. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD TO UTILIZE THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON JANUARY 15, MARCH 12, MAY 7, JUNE 25, SEPTEMBER 3, AND NOVEMBER 19, 2003, 9:00 A.M. TO 2:00 P.M. 10. ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT DEED CONVEYING FEE SIMPLE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR MADISON STREET MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL - PGA WEST HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. XI. BUSINESS SESSION CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO FILL CITY COUNCIL VACANCY. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 2. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON A PUBLIC NUISANCE CITATION REGARDING THE VIOLATION OF FRONT/SIDE YARD SETBACK, SATELLITE DISH LOCATION, AND CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT A PERMIT AT 53-750 AVENIDA OBREGON. APPELLANT: BILL AND JAN TURNER. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPOINTMENT OF TWO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE DESERT PLEIN AIR ART PURCHASE COMMITTEE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION TO THE FEDERAL FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE REGARDING THE AMENDMENT TO THE FRINGE -TOED LIZARD M.O.U. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 5. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO PREPARE THE CITY MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN AND APPOINT A CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION XII. STUDY SESSION - None XIII. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1 . CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 3. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 5. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) n n,I City Council Agenda Page 3 December 17, 2002 XIII. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (continued) 6. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 14. SAN JACINTO/SANTA ROSA NATIONAL MONUMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 15. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 16. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR NOV. 18, 2002. 17. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR NOV. 6, 2002. 18. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES FOR NOV. 21, 2002. 19. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 12, AND 26, 2002. 20. INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 13, 2002. XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1 . CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENT B. GRANT UPDATE FOR 2002 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2002 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2002 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2002 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2002 A. STATUS UPDATE ON JEFFERSON STREET - PHASE II 9. POLICE CHIEF MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2002 10. FIRE CHIEF XV. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION OF THE LANDSCAPING AT HIGHWAY 111 AND WASHINGTON STREET IN FRONT OF LG's STEAK HOUSE. (AT THE REQUEST OF MAYOR ADOLPH) RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. XVI. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. XVII. PRESENTATIONS - None 004 City Council Agenda Page 4 December 17, 2002 XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. Any person may submit written comments to the La Quinta City Council/ Redevelopment Agency before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of, or in opposition to, the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing. 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON: 1) CERTIFICATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389, AND 2) TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, AMENDMENT #2, FOR A 381-LOT SUBDIVISION ON ± 127 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT: CORNERSTONE DEVELOPERS. A. RESOLUTION ACTION. 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON: 1) CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-459; 2) SPECIFIC PLAN 87-01 1, AMENDMENT NO. 4, DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A 488,050 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER; 3) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-072 TO ALLOW AN ATHLETIC FACILITY USE OVER 5,000 SQUARE FEET; 4) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 50.62 ACRES INTO SIX PARCELS; AND, 5) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF FIVE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS LOCATED ON PROPERTY BOUNDED BY HIGHWAY 111, AVENUE 47, WASHINGTON STREET, AND ADAMS STREET. APPLICANT: WASHINGTON 1 1 1, LTD. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S). XIX. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to a regularly scheduled City Council Meeting to be held January 7, 2003 at 2:00 p.m in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253, commencing with closed session items at 2:00 p.m. and open business session at 3:00 p.m. �n5 City Council Agenda Page 5 December 17, 2002 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, December 17, 2002 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, December 13, 2002. DATED: December 13, 2002 a JUNE S. GREEK, CIVIC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 p.m session or the 7:00 p.m session. City Council Agenda Page 6 December 17, 2002 U - ��w4 AGENDA CATEGORY: OF I� COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated December 17, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated December 17, 2002 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 51935 - 519721 2,005,856.25 51973 - 519811 43,622.19 Wire Transfers} 126,085.73 P/R 9956 - 10037 118,529.85 P/R Tax Transfers} 33,088.76 Payable Warrants: 51982 - 521041 1,103,925.02 $3,431,107.80 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City $3,330,367.80 Demand of Cash -RDA $100,740.00 Falconer, Finance Director BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING l 007 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 11/27/02 - 12/10/02 12/06/02 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP $9,860.58 12/06/02 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $11,493.15 12/06/02 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION $5,792.00 12/06/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA RSCROW $98,940.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $126,085.73 m 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:33PM 12/10/0- CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 51982 12/10/02 &01882 GLORIA ALBERT 25.00 51983 12/10/02 &01883 SANDRA HARP 100.00 51984 12/10/02 &01884 JODA F LANDMAN 70.00 51985 12/10/02 &01885 JULIE MAHI 55.00 51986 12/10/02 &01886 CAROLYN MEYER 25.00 51987 12/10/02 AlRO01 A-1 RENTS 156.80 51988 12/10/02 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 87.95 51989 12/10/02 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 453.66 51990 12/10/02 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 98.00 51991 12/10/02 ALL056 RONALD & SANDRA ALLEN 657.04 51992 12/10/02 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 42.00 51993 12/10/02 AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 54.97 51994 12/10/02 ASI050 ASI SIGN SYSTEMS 119.91 51995 12/10/02 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 82.50 51996 12/10/02 BAR007 LANCE & ANNETTE BARLOW 328.52 51997 12/10/02 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 11250.00 51998 12/10/02 BOG100 SHARON BOGAN 147.00 51999 12/10/02 BRD100 B RUSSELL/DBA B R DETAIL 50.00 52000 12/10/02 BUT100 GREG BUTLER 39.33 52001 12/10/02 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 208.86 52002 12/10/02 CAL035 CAL PRESERVATION FOUNDATN 100.00 52003 12/10/02 CAL060 CALIF STREET MAINTENANCE 5243.52 52004 12/10/02 CAL237 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 34.50 52005 12/10/02 CAL240 CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS 428.00 52006 12/10/02 CAM045 CAMERON NURSERY & TURF 364.20 52007 12/10/02 CAP050 ROSMARY CAPUTO 171.50 52008 12/10/02 CAR070 CARDIFF LIMOUSINE INC 592.25 52009 12/10/02 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 2127.03 52010 12/10/02 CEN050 CENTURY CROWELL 2355.56 52011 12/10/02 CIT050 CITY CLERK'S ASSOC OF CAL 210.00 52012 12/10/02 COM001 COMMANDING GENERAL 3.85 52013 12/10/02 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 1493.75 52014 12/10/02 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 285.00 52015 12/10/02 CVI100 C V INDUSTRIAL & AG SUPP 85.77 52016 12/10/02 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 491.15 52017 12/10/02 DEP150 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 105.00 52018 12/10/02 DES010 DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES 6.68 52019 12/10/02 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 840.03 52020 12/10/02 DES051 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL 230.00 52021 12/10/02 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 4878.64 52022 12/10/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 2121.24 52023 12/10/02 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 420.00 52024 12/10/02 DRU100 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP 114.32 52025 12/10/02 DUN200 KATHY DUNHAM 616.00 52026 12/10/02 ELM100 ELMS EQUIPMENT RENTAL INC 382.•54 52027 12/10/02 EVA050 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 12084.00 52028 12/10/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 830.00 009 003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:33PM 12/10/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 52029 12/10/02 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 342.92 52030 12/10/02 FIR017 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 287.19 52031 12/10/02 FRE100 JOHN FREELAND 58.28 52032 12/10/02 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 293188.42 52033 12/10/02 GUM050 BRAD GUMMER 91.00 52034 12/10/02 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 28.60 52035 12/10/02 HIG010 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 205.93 52036 12/10/02 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 1672.42 52037 12/10/02 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 75.00 52038 12/10/02 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 50.00 52039 12/10/02 JAC150 STEVEN JACOBS 315.00 52040 12/10/02 JIF100 JIFFY LUBE/AFMS 570.80 52041 12/10/02 JOH040 KERRY D JOHNSTON 548.00 52042 12/10/02 JON120 TIMOTHY R. JONASSON 3330.35 52043 12/10/02 KEM100 PAUL & TAMARA KEMP 328.52 52044 12/10/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 3000.00 52045 12/10/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 4120.00 52046 12/10/02 KUS100 KUSTOM IMPRINTS 50.38 52047 12/10/02 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 42.70 52048 12/10/02 LIE050 LIEBERT CASSIDY 58.98 52049 12/10/02 LOP300 ROLDAN LOPEZ 548.00 52050 12/10/02 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 56278.19 52051 12/10/02 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 70.95 52052 12/10/02 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 100.00 52053 12/10/02 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 5526.97 52054 12/10/02 MUN175 IRVING MUNOWITZ 591.50 52055 12/10/02 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 1000.00 52056 12/10/02 NEX010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1730.22 52057 12/10/02 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 953.85 52058 12/10/02 PAR030 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 848.67 52059 12/10/02 PAR125 RACHEL PARRISH 154.00 52060 12/10/02 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 49.00 52061 12/10/02 PRI020 THE PRINTING PLACE 653.79 52062 12/10/02 PR0005 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND 2621.00 52063 12/10/02 PVP100 PVP COMMUNICATIONS INC 852.42 52064 12/10/02 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 2919.50 52065 12/10/02 RAS035 CHARLOTTE RASHMI-GRAFF 1305.50 52066 12/10/02 RES005 RESERVE ACCOUNT 4000.00 52067 12/10/02 RIE200 PAT RIENSCHE 1008.00 52068 12/10/02 RIV021 RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITOR 231.00 52069 12/10/02 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 4195.20 52070 12/10/02 RIV325 RIVERSIDE RUBBER STAMP 42.09 52071 12/10/02 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 4610.00 52072 12/10/02 SCE105 SCESA 50.00 52073 12/10/02 SCI100 LOUISE SCIUTTO 120.00 52074 12/10/02 SET050 SETON IDENTIFICATION 235.24 52075 12/10/02 SIM020 JAMES E SIMON CO 612318.60 52076 12/10/02 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 265.36 52077 12/10/02 SMI020 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY INC 74.33 010 m ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:33PM 12/10/0- CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 52078 12/10/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 1722.50 52079 12/10/02 SOU008 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE 214.50 52080 12/10/02 SOU050 SOUTHERN CALIF MUNICIPAL 50.00 52081 12/10/02 SOU100 SOUTHLAND GEOTECHNICL INC 838.00 52082 12/10/02 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 339.86 52083 12/10/02 STA050 STAPLES 39.82 52084 12/10/02 ST0040 CAM STONE'S AUTOMOTIVE 1042.63 52085 12/10/02 STUO10 WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD 157.50 52086 12/10/02 SUN080 SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP 1479.93 52087 12/10/02 SWR100 SWRCB FEES 2500.00 52088 12/10/02 TKDO10 T.K.D. ASSOCIATES INC 311.33 52089 12/10/02 TOP010 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 51.99 52090 12/10/02 TRA200 STEVEN TRAXEL 39.33 52091 12/10/02 TR1O10 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 22386.00 52092 12/10/02 TRU010 TRULY NOLEN INC 74.00 52093 12/10/02 USP016 US POSTMASTER 150.00 52094 12/10/02 VAL001 TONY VALENTE 200.00 52095 12/10/02 VAL007 VALLEY CRIME STOPPERS 400.00 52096 12/10/02 VAL020 VALLEY PLUMBING 250.31 52097 12/10/02 VAN020 DENNIS VAN BUSKIRK 462.00 52098 12/10/02 WAL010 WAL MART COMMUNITY 480.29 52099 12/10/02 WAS011 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE 142.82 52100 12/10/02 W00100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 357.00 52101 12/10/02 XER010 XEROX CORPORATION 4062.37 52102 12/10/02 XER050 XESYSTEMS INC 213.00 52103 12/10/02 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 3465.00 52104 12/10/02 ZUR050 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 110.90 CHECK TOTAL 1,103,925.02 011 005 .-1 N M v' Ln N w m c r ul N �z W H O Z O O \ H x w N l0 N w N ID N lD N D) N Q\ N l0 N D) N N - lD N � D1 N H 01 N £ a W F E E. I E F ', E E+ F 1. F E E E. E a a M m E O O O O O o O O O O O m Ln a O O O o l0 lD O O V' O O O Z w E E z m N N o o o r Ln Ln Ln (N ui r m M r + M rn c N m rn r Lr) lD N c >+ a O .--1 ri r1 4. O O O O O O O O O O O m Ul D1 lD 1D O O a' o In N o o w O r Lr) lf) uO N w Ln r m M Ln m m r Ln .--I Z O H a ❑ a � a z w ❑ .7 a .a a U O a a .] a .a a E Z a a a a E a ❑ Z O (n u) E O u) E O W H O M u) E+ O u) u) E O W w E+ O H O E O E. 0 m z E+ O O 0 W U I.,a E a E a a E £ 0 E a .7 E.a a E+ F. El E U U U El O E+ O U E .] 21 H O D1 H U a O U cc O x a O U a: O U z O z W a O M w a O >>> w w m Z O H U a O cn 0: O c� > Z C U ❑ z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ Z £ 4, ❑ Z H `4 O Z £ £ £ ❑ Z x Y. ❑ z O O Z H u) O E. W > O [,., W > O w> W O w> W O w> W H o> W D, a W > a < P4 a a w > E w > a a w > 0 m W ❑ w a w a w x w a w x a w o m a a a a a a H m w w U W r rn m N H ❑ O > > (Y. W u) O r l0 u-) 1D �D M O1 a\ v at D) m Ol D) O H ID M Z H ❑ Z H £ ❑ D H r .-i c H D r-I r lD a Ln Ln Ln Ln to Ln Ln M r H ❑ z r1 H ,� ,� a' lD N N M M M M M M O w c .--� H ,Y, a z a a m w m x i o O w F W O O if1 O O O O O O O O O d O C' O v' N D1 o O OD m W O O M M O O O O �D lD lD Ln O L') o z m M v' r M C c v' m M v m M T Ln �O O r M O lD rn o lD rn o 1D a) O lD m lD N rn o �D F z O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (`) In V' Ln M N O N ct' u1 'v' c u7 c N O N O O O O M U U a O O O O O O O O O (D O M O u) W z U) a z z z wl Z o a U O a z m ui ai H w a a E F F F � 0 w LL N z H a x a z m < a`4i a o a H a CL' w w z r w a a w v) co.) w u) u w Ena u a ❑ U a a s a 0 ❑ 0 .7 2 a 0 .a D O A: a W .a W F ❑ E. ❑ E. ❑ W O z 0 u) z U' U) h h U a a a a a co a E w z 0 w > N M v N ID O O O O ID �n O O N U E U H m m ,-� O m m •--� O m m o m m •--� 0 m m 0 O O a .--� O O .7 w Cl H H ❑❑❑ o H E O H E . N O U 14 L!) O .7 •-7 r W 012 a U a Laa a a a a a a 006 z r m m O N M v n l0 r m m O N M v to O m ID N N N N N N to N O � E+ Z N O O H \ N x 01 Ol m mOl m m m01 m MOl 01 O1 01 MOl m O l0 N U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H W U E- < .--I 1H .-I r1 ri r-I H .-i H e--1 H .--I .--I r-I ri r-1 r-I r-1 .--I H i Q m E+ E F E-E H E E+ H E4 F E4 E H E E E E+ E+ E+ E. E a a ID M r r, o N o 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M E. M m tt7 to o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O z F N m o O O o O O o O O o O 1n O O u) r O w £ z o to .-1 m N to O o o o o 0 to to o o N O O r 'v' to N O M O M M to m M ID H A. O r H O N O O O O O 01 m ul N d 0 N m O to r C LO rl m N N r M '-1 H u) 0 z 0 a a a a [u a o U o U o o o U > o U a m arS FC C F E- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > O El p u n H O E O O O O `.G x x '.L x z �' x `� x x x x J4 E 04 Ow u) E �1 w H E E u) E U E-F O U E U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U o 3 U H E oL z w W GG > fx O H O O O u) O co O x x x x x x x x x x x T S x x 0 U O W > a; p 0 m Cl o O p U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 x o a 1zi cU W u) W W w W W W W z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z w H W H W > E > E > 0 > a > �C a FC FC a FC r.0 a Q FC FC r.0 > cn > S co z, n, m a w a y a w a a a w a a a a a H > U W r H L] (Z O o O o ' to N .--I H N M c to to CD m� w r M N r m Z z £ n to l0 M 0 0 O 0 l0 to to to r r r m m m r r M H p H O a) M m Q' C' Q' Q' Q' V' V' V' Q' Q' V' C Q V' - V H z m o to o r r r r r r r r r r c- r r r r o p a r1 r-1 to N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N --1 H `,L a z m w m 1 O 0 o w F p: O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N H w m M O O Ln to to to to in ti to to to to to to to to n w O N to to N to to to N to to alto to to to u) to lD E 0 01 to to m 01 01 01 01 01 01 cn 01 01 Ol Ol z o O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O t0 r l0 N l0 lD w l0 tQ l0 ID lD to to w to to w to l0 �D F z N r M O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O to N O an N N N t11 to to to to to N to tf1 Lo to O O lfi U U O O O M o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o to a u) U 3 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U rt > O z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z Z E- u) H H H H H H I--1 H H H F-I H H F-I - wp M E a 4 z a a a a a a 0: a C a a a a a o a E m FC FC a FC RC FC K FC < a < < < < a o O u) O C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 to U W H H H H HI H H H H H H 1--1 F-1 H H m W E Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z r� z H a E W w w W W W W W w W W W W w W r1 a co W W x T T x x x T x x x T x x T S z Q >+ E z w u) z w w w w w .a w w w to w w w w o UO a .4 z z CD w E a z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z m a W FC o CL H RC E E i 2 E z u) > 01 H V) E W >A >4 >+ >i >4 > >4 >+ >. >+ O u) < a a o U a a x x a a x x a a x a a a x a m a O w H E+ Z a p u) o r.0 w w w w w w w w W W W w W W W x z a < a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m co m E w Z O W > O o o r O o O o 0 o O o O o o O O o 0 0 0 o O to M C. to to N to to to N N to N to N ul to to O O O N O o O .-+ .--1 '-I r/ f-1 r-I '-I .-1 r-1 H r-1 H H .--I .-1 H r-1 U E-F W H E+ fx 04 0.: a W a a G4 a a a cL' a tx R: a (D p U H co m FC w w w w w w w w W w W w w w w o a 1' 3 U a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 007 Z r W m O - O N o) N M v' lD N M • N N N M M M M M M M H .--� •--� O E. Z N O O H \ M N S U rn Q• (n c) m Q\ lD O) cy) rn m l0 ID ID N N N N N N N N N (N (1 N N N •-1 H r-4 H H r-1 r-I r-4 r1 H � £ m E H F H F El E+ E. E F E+ F E-F E E+ a a M M v' O �o W O N O O O O O O M E-F M O .1 O O N N O O O N N N o) 14 z 01 LO r o) r O M -q r v r N �D £ O M O W o v M O .-1 O m N » O H H N H N H M H M N a O M �o O N O O O O Ln p M S O �) O N N N (D o) DD O M c m v H N N M O O C M N )D r m N •-+ CV v' M H LO ui U a a a W a a a s H H E a m a a z a ai a EO Qi H gi z z z a E. .Y. T. 0 O < H 0 O O a 0 0 0 r� m 0 < O � w H E Z \ a O H \ 1U-1 DE, (L' a V) [n V) a S CL U a S a z z z a to a E+ a a D; u) o ff O w 0 ££££ O rn 0 z 0 U O H H H O D o U O O O w > a O U 0 a D: z m O a O H O H O r•Ci rSi a O Z O O O a O H Z U Z < z o 0 0 o z W z a z z Z H H H z H Z a Z V) Z a H V) W W w Cu W Cu k, W m W W W CZ W z z z w W H W z w CL w > a > H H H H > £ > w > w > D D D > > u) > > a D a) p H £ z D z D z D z D W £ 3 v) > O O C.. O Cu 0 Cu fffLLL [.. z H E V) W G. H E4 a V rn 0 W p n p > 1 > m u) M c H H v a• N O N N z z £ M In N .--I N o] N r " 0 H M .-1 .-1 H .-M o1 Ln V' u-) 'O' N N 1b H Z O N N c Lr) r N N if) M U Q H H H .--1 M M N N N r N S H x a z a a m w m a 1 0 o m H a O O O O O O lD O M 0 0 O N w O O O O O O '-1 O v' O O O m O H m O O O O O O lD O )D O O O N O OD D r r r r r Ol H N O) M M M 01 M M z M .--1 ti .--1 H c N v O O Cl O O O O 1D lD w ID ID 1O l0 l0 r r E+ Z C M r a' r N M M r v' v' a' N M N D 1n N Lr) N to O Ln N N Lr) Ln N O N O O M c M c M m c H m C c v N N 1f) U FC O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Z F w z a a a C. Z rC a a a m U Ul u) `/) N N a a a a o w M a a a a Cu H Ua a w U O a a a a z H W w z O O D O a z H z V) co z H ,n U) U] U) U) 0 D'. a a a > H a H £ W O o 0 m O V) E+ > 0 0 0 w E-E O z a a a a H o a a a V) O o w 1 a O 0 0 0 > w a. a E £ Cu W W 44 D: w FC < FCC < D H z W H a F-I F-1 H H w c4 H H H H Z U a a a Z E+ Z Z Z Z to F+ z Z Z z W m H D D D D D w V) % z 14 m z >+ C+. > < D m D; O 0 0 O O a [ai O >+ Od H E H F a [L E. 44 Cu E. a � H U RC a C7 W W W w H H H H H W O a o a u a u u a a a u o a o U U U U U U U U U U U a U u F w W Z O > O O O O O m O r o O O it O p O O O H H H H M lD M C N r U] 0 > H O O O O O O N N N N O O O O U H H q M m a a a a a a a a 3 U H D a a�� < a a a �i Q a O U m U U U u U U U U U U U U U U 14 008 z QT Ln lO r r co O1 O N m M .--1 N N N m N e N O, M O c to N N O E Z O '-I \ v N .-1 W x U E l0 N t0 N l0 N 01 N 1.0 N l0 N l0 N l0 N 01 N w N l0 N 10 N l0 N 01 N 01 cl, l0 N 0 E a 4 In ri E+ r-1 E '-1 F rI E+ .-I E+ .-� E-F I E r-1 E+ 1 E. r-1 E+ r-I F -4 E rd E-F r-I E. E+ r-1 E- a a ID M M E. M N v O m r N O Ln m Ln r o O r r o O Ln N o 0 0 o m z W E E. Z o r w v' ul m r Ln Ln O rl M M 01 Ln m to m Ln Vr m m r N v v do O 1.0 yi o rl N M N V' N a M l0 0 Ln Lr1 O r Ln o o n o m r o r N r+ H o U) C r N H to al (n o .-+ N M M m V' N m N m Ol v' m o rl w E+ N N m W fk Z r.0 W 0.+ E. ma Z C� N O 3 o< a F< a c o< a ❑ a FC a < a a RC x w a w a w x w a W a r1 a< a 2 z o o N Z ate, O o E o CO z E-E o ❑ E O Z a F 0 F 0 E 0 m F. E-F o F < E a E a E a F a F 0 O x E 0 U W O H E. W x Ln x E+ O U E. 04 H F m E-E z O E W E z RC E 3 3 3 3 3 E O U E >+ Ll. "a' O H U H U rC W ❑ Z O cn a O 2% to O m E Iz O F U a O w < x O a x O 0 Z 0 z 0 Z 0 Z O Z a O .4z < O O U > z ,% U fu E. [L E z ❑ z o a ❑ z a w ❑ z .40 < z O m ❑ z CLO z m I-+ ❑ z H x H x H x H x H x ❑ z ❑ ❑ z (L' H m W O UD O m W > a cc W > m �` W > a W > F m w > >+ IL W > FC W w > z H z H z H z H z H w > O O W > O a m ❑ a 3 o a a W o m w E rn N z H 0 V w m x ❑❑❑❑❑ am x a x a m O U w r.� U W H ❑ a. p1 O I I I 1 I O > I > 14 m .-1 m O m M N r Ln m r m m 0 m c r z H ❑ z H O o M lD Ln l0 M l0 N Ln .--i to to C C ul lD Ln lO lD m M O N Ln H z 41 W 44 oo c m c m ao m ❑ H x x 2 2 M v' N N N N < z a < m w m a I o O f= E a N .--1 O O O O o O tD M N Ol N O M L1 N m N m N m N m O O c m O O m m m o O O vI Lr) m l0 m m m m O Ln O E z M o c) o Ln u) m lO - d' 01 o 01 0 M o 01 H M o M cm) M o M 0 C) o 01 O M C. r r m N E-+ z O N O N O N O O O rl O r-I ul N o M Ln .-I O M Ln M Ln M Ln M o r♦ .-i r-I O N o 0 Ln to Ln O N N N un r U < N O N N O Ln N O Ln 1D M r O ri O rl o f-1 o rl O Ln O ,--I O H O r-- o N O O a a U W ❑ x x 2 2 2 z W o U E !.>r F fY' F fY E P4 F a W U H x M U U U U a Z Z Z Z 2 2 E. o O z H z H z H O m H z m m 'L lu W W W m Lr) a m W a w o 0 0 0 0 h m w < E z E z E z a w < z w FC w cr n. a < m m m m m [ m w W W w 3 m cD a x H a x a x m 0 z I E E E O W W W W W W W H r.0 W E z w% z z a W U x a 0 Z ❑ W E. m HHPPP FC << 4 a E z m ❑ a z m H W > W > w > >+ W a H ❑ cti w E+ O ❑ 3 3 3 3 3 W E m FC o >� QI O (D O LI) O U a - U z < E o Z H w z W z W z W z w z E D: F a < a E > £ w a 0 0 0 0 0 < W a s a 0 ❑ 3 ❑❑❑ 3 3 z w E H £ 0 E 0 OG 0 > z a Z a z a z a z a CL w m w m Z U U U U U U U U U O ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ E c. 2 O O W > o in O u) O ) o O ul o N o N O O O O O O O o O o O O O Ln O Q E -i O O O c O O O "" I F~-1 z Z z z z LL C) m U H U < ❑❑ FC g Q ❑❑ Q w ❑ W ❑ 009 z N M V u7 l0 ID r m m N O M O Ln r V' m a' 0) C H M O N M uo E-E O Z N O H Ln N ,--4 W z U F m N O1 N al N m N m N O) N ID N U) N tD N l0 N �D N O) N at N Q\ N Qt N �Q N 0- D\ N l0 N m N 0 E Q a in ,� F �, F+ F .� F+ E+ F H E ,� E .� E+ .� F .� E-E ,� E ,� E+ �, E E F E H F H E a a M y [- r 0) C' O m m 01 v u') Uo O O O O a' u r N O M O 0 M M V' m V' m lD (D O N M O O O M z W E. z N r un u'I N o m o) M tD O M M M £ yi o p lD M (D N N N H C M N M 0) (o M o M m r N (r N r r (Ij Q W N H m l0 M O O O d lD v N O O N M O O O c m O M N m r m v H N N O N V O H w a Q E E E F E E Z O E o E. o W (n O 0 z O O U > U > U > O O O W O a W H F E O F H H H H E. E M m F O E F O E. rU-+ a O M M M a4 Z F F E D: F a m a F 0: Z p > H a O 0 (n [n (n to to V7 O 0 E-E H O O H F H F H E H E H o: o O U F U r U < O 0 U 5 o W O H O Q U O O W O £ W z U Z F x F x F x F F x E x z W a H z W a W w W w w au W m Z w d F IL' E C4 F z W z F+ z a W a+ z w z E. z W H Vi w W > 0 > U > > > > > m > z z z > cn > a > u) > o (n H a H a H a H a H a H a Q E. Q 0 Q 0 Q 0J Q m O U O U O U .Z H u) z H Of w w k U W O o r H O H D p a W � w o o w Ln to M m 0 o ul c Ln (o o m 0 m 0 m o m m v v I c > z > z m £ u7 o Ln o to O H o M 0 M o (D I O m O m O m O m (D C' ID O H N LO Q' M H O H O O O O O O O M m m m 0) m m m 01 o m (o (n M ul M iO H v' Ln O O H `.G En m m (n m m Q z a Q m w m x I o o w F (Z W O O O o O O O O O O O o O O O O O o O O O o O o c M v' M c M N (n c M N 0) O o m O O O O O O O O o O O O u1 Ln V7 N m Ln O "J M M M M M M M M Lr) u) Lf) H Ln �) n m m dl N z O r O r O O o O 0 (D 0 H w v' n O (o O w O w u1 w O N O u, O ui O (o O r (o w F z Q r Ln r (n Vw N -T Lr) V' u) a' to M un H O H O H O H Ln N o v' u) d' u) N Tn N o M (n N o M u7 O U M M C c' V' C N N N v' H N M M c N V' N U Q O O O o o O O o 0 0 0 0 o o O O O o 0 a O O O O O U H r >� >» > » >+ U (n w a al a al a a, a a4 a a. a a. o 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z a o a < M a O 4r a Or 0 a O a D Qr o w H H x H x H x H x H x U E-F z O H H H H H H U U U Q w D: U') 4r U H U H U H u H U H U H z a m a m a W a m a CO z H z H z H U H E Q a E x E a F a F a F a F (n o W 0 o, 5 a. 0 4, o a. (n (/] (n a W z W I Q U w U w U w U w U w U w 0 z z z z z z w £££ a w M < z £ n w E. a z a W a W a W a W a W a W Q u) D o In 0 [n 0 (n o (n w E. w E w E a C7 0 z O H O < O H F H F E E+ E+ H H F E F F F F O O 0 r a Q a a w a w fz w a w D: w D: w a w as w z w z w z w w w a w (z w (z W o £ N z (n a, Q a O o m w m w m w m w m w m w m w w w m w m w m w m w m w (n w (n w u) W o a F £ a (n z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o w E z 0 W > m m m m m . O O O O O i ul O O O O D H H H H H H u) n c) t0 l0 (D l0 w (o ID O O O O O UF O (n O (n o (n O (n O to O to O ul O cn O (n O (n O m (D O m O m O (n O (n N o H 0 N 2 � Y j 7♦{ U H r.0 U w 0 w D w O w D w O w O w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w O w O w 0 w 0 o 0 a 0 o O �(�1^1 0010 z a w O N Ln M Ln C in U7 Ln M M C M N M l0 Ln lc M r Ln r M m M m N M Ln �o N E+ Z O O H \ 0 N H W (' E a n, m x U F a W 01 N .-1 E 01 N H El m N H F, 01 N H F+ l0 N .--1 E l0 N H E+ ID N H E+ Ol N ri E+ l0 N H E-H 01 N H E+ l0 N H E ID N CN- E 01 N H F Ol N H F. 01 N H F M M E. C N O O O O O O r N O\ H O O m N N C O O O l0 Ol ,n C M O �O W x >� 6a z O O t0 N m o clj H .-1 M M �O c N m ,n m m M 01 N ,-+ Ol m N I C m C O O O N 01 01 H m N N C O O O w M 01 N m (+) `„4 P4 a C m O cN O M m N C M r m N m ,n E-m Z W W m H rn rl O% m N z a W ,n O (V a F z a a H 0 E a a (n w (n w a a a H a H a a w H w H a a a a > a E N a a a a a a 1 a z o of a a a a W Z o H W a E-E O E E o O E. 0 F x vl a x (n a F O E a E a E E O EF a O, w CL E. 0 F+ E+ O E E (n E 0 F M E O E H O F U Z W Z E o E U H O > E O. H a H z W E a4 o ❑ a E z a O ❑ 3 W ,-7 3 W 4 z o ❑ E x U' H H x 0 H z O ❑ O (n W o (n W a O ❑ W C7 a O ❑ Z O m O; O z E O U ❑ O % O ❑ w CD a O ❑ O H H a O H E a a Q (� (n W H Z H U (n w CL H o> Z W H O a> Z w UUZ H x H x> W Z a w Z a W> Z w W Ga W w 4, W> Z W a w a> Z w W G., w> Z a W F (n z W > a W a> Z w (D H oc C7 H x> Z W .7 fL a (n w w ❑ O w a a W >> w > O > O O U o U H E w h z H H E a H a H (n U W H ❑ O > I > a W Cq O I O c) l0 l0 H .-� O M I 01 o M I O) m , n m ,n N I m H Ol r c3 O H ,n C Z H ❑ H O Z H E O z C ,f1 O C m H .-( H M M ,n l0 H M ,n l0 M C I C M C I C C M M ,n C M M ul C 0n N N C Ln O r ,n H N O N H ,Y. a z a a m w m 0 I O O w F x W W E o O O O O O ti ,n l0 H Lr)O ko �O O O o O O 0 m W 0 m m 0 O O o O 1f1 O O O o O O 0 O O o O O r C m O z N O� O 01 Ol to C u, O M O Cl C. r M O ID � r M c r M ID O• O Ol O M O r E z O o U M ul c C Q1 ID a O ,n O ,n M N H r .-1 r M ,n + M to O ,Lfl c m m o O O o Lfl ,n M C Ln c C ,Il c C ,!'1 c a O H C> o V' 0 In Ln Ln O o 0 0 0 o O O c) o cD 0 0 U Z H U Z O U U Z H U Z H M a F Z H U o a O s O (n U H (n U H 0 H 0 H 0 H cD o ,n a a a H Z u a w a H s H U (n (n w U (n to W a W cn s w (n ❑ U o a F W a E a 0 H 0 C7 H a I a W F W E a H (n z a a E w ❑ s F w O z R, x W z aL x W W U H O W U H O z a a W M z O U a, W E (n a U ❑ PG H x a H x E, O 14 z cQ H N OI a O w > W ❑ m w m w rah 9 a s 9 x U E x U E W a W w -, fF E o (7 a a x U w E U w F n, W ❑ a s a o ❑ u) x a H > a a, a, x w o. x W ❑❑ w w w (n a H (n Cr H z x o z ❑ z O x 0 x H w f o (n E Cv Z O z W > W O O O W o W 0 ul 0 G o Cu r C r h o C7 o ca O 7 O x o x 0 x 0 D o > i U E U H O r-1 E 4 In O a > O N w x o N u, x H O no w .-1 O W rl O a H H O x H O H w ix .-1 O ,n O x O a H O 00 - O M O Ei1 My OI � a U W W W W [x, k W L 11, C7 0 x x x x 0011 z N M v' LO lD r D> C. m m O N N M M c ip M c c �D iD r r r c r v r O E+ Z N O O r N x U D1 01 01 01 D\ Ol l0 l0 l0 Ol 01 Ol O1 01 l0 01 l0 � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �--1 H H .-a .--� �-i H H rl .-� H H H '-1 H H lc, H £ FC W F E E E F E E+ E. E-F E E+ E F E+ E+ E. F+ F a a M 01 .--I N D\ N a> O O O O N r (D Ln N O O M El M N O M H I'D O O o r �D M r-1 O M O o z W E+ Z - to lD v o rr Lr) o U') 0) V• H Ln m o m o 0 £ O O o ID O O r in r-1 a' M N v' M N O N �+ 0 N (N M r1 M rl N V) M M o -+ M M a w N O (D O O O LO N O v' O O O N Lr) O Ln O Z m O m O r r Ln H r O C M N c)lD Z M Ln w Ln M M O a 0 LO W H ❑ x F Z N U O O u) x w o a a a 0 a s a a 0 fz A a a s W W a a N< H a E, � H H H H E Qi E Qi Q z F El E W E E FC p E E. E. Z Z E CO E, E U E w O O DO O OC w aC w aC w W O z Z O W O z 0 W O w 112 F H ME. a F WWWWP OE- w H OE- ❑ F Iz 0 OE O a a a D; U W U " W w m m to W w a a w a 1z c: a W Z D: U O H w w w w w w 0 U O 0 0 UZ O W W W W O co O O u) O w 0 z > x . H H H . H ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ .7 ❑ a a a a ❑ D ❑ is ❑ 0 ❑ z ❑ H z U a a a a a a z D: z z z z U U U U z a z z z a z H Z F H u) w w w a, w w w E. w U w E w H H H H W w W H W w W W x w w w w w w w> v) > u) > to > x x x x> z> >> D: > E> 0 ❑ O ❑ o ❑ o ❑ Z U 2 W W W W O O O W H (n U) VI V1 VI (n fn H H H > > > > co £ u) z a w w U W c o H ❑ % M lD m Lo o) m O O 0 W c• lD �fl v c M v O Ol �D N �--� r1 > I > im N H H H '-1 M D1 m V' O N l0 �o O O z z £ N H O o .-i N m Lo w o m M M m H ❑ "M N O N H N N CD m m m m H Z o �O O O H r N N r N O O lD £ ❑ v .--I m �n �D m H m m N m l0 lD H a H AG a z cL 4 co w rm a 1 0 0 w E o O O O O ul N O O O c) O O c)O O N O w W O O O O O N D1 O (D Lo Ln N c) O CD O W c) c) O c) O m Ln O c)lD �D w lD lD O O O m O O M M M M M M Ol 01 r 01 01 D• Ot m N N N M z o O O O O o O c lD c O O 1D w lD lD ID r lD �o c 1D 1D w kD N tD N E Z O Ln Ln Lr) uN Ln Ln N O N O O O — O - O H O - O O O v' O O O M O v in 0 N D\ O in Ln Ln Ln O r-1 O H v U U Un O 0 0 0 0 O O o o O O O O M O M O O H H v Lo n Ln In r r (D z w z 0 0 to H H E-E a E+ U H O U z W w a M z O w > E o O z u) w z Ln U m O x O w £££ � a a w < m a a a z a z 0 r.� F F E E E+ F W O U W W w W O ❑ W WE- 0 0 0 0 0 0 w H < fSl ¢1 W W h w' < O H a z CL D. w CL w w O E h O a M" w w w w w w O < a a a a ❑ >+ 0 J4 a o ❑❑❑❑ o❑ x z z x N Cl 1% w E+ a w < w w w w w w w W w > w w w w D; O - W U w r1 O ££££££ N E w w w w w D; £ z ❑ a m ❑ z 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 x O x O x Q w z H F u) H h H h H h H h w `.L H F H d4 O P] E. w w z O > O O O o 0 0 o c o 0 o O o 0 o c O o O M M M M M M n H n U O c) O O T N G O c) O >+ O c) O O O O c O � H HO H O H O F ££££££ O E U w w w w x z _ z U H O O O O O O O z < H H H H O O H U x x x x x x x H I'j ID r3 Y. 0012 z c Ln �D r 00 m r m o c Ln �o rn rt c c c r r r r r c v oo ._ 00 ao m c 4L O E+ z N O O H m N x U to ID lD m 0) m 0) 01 ID ID m R, T. �. m 01 m ID H _ U < H H H 1 H H H H H e�i H £ < m E-E E+ E E+ E E+ E E E. E+ E I- E, E E E E a a W M m o m o N r r m C. m M r o M F M r 01 O O r O O O T. 1 N 1D c ,n z W E z O N m m 00 O M r O O M <- c .--+ lD O) £ D ,n c U-) c T H ,n O ul 0l Ln 0 � D\ O Ln N r .--� r H v �f c, lD M r Ln H C a H a' o m o 0o o rn Lr) C) O 1` r 1l O H a\ O O O N m m m o O FC < 4 < Q Q w N al c Un c r r o N ,H Ln N .-+ E E, F E E E+ u1 c W W 'p U) U) to '; V; U) U) U) U) U U Lo U O z Z 2 E E '-- F F E+ O D W W W z z z z m E. E F+ F W G] W W W W W a a a a a z z a a a a£, £££ E a < a a x a F a H H a a rc CO w w I_ W W W W 4 z E- U) E E a E. CO E-r� r� E-E CO O E-W O z > O C c > c > O > O > O F O w O H O E E D O E C4 O F O 3 O E z O 0 F ££ O E W W E O F+ a CL a: a M Z E OG H O U w W C7 E+ O W a '1, G. a a a O " W a x % E D; (D z a a s a p < a E m U' E :_ £ £ E a E. O H O U) O U O z 0 U) O << O Q a 0 U O cC H H H H O U > pG p p D p H p D p U U p CO a a D p w p O z U Z E. Z C4 z z z .a Z M U) z z a z E. .a z m H U) ww W > w W > E W > H W > a � W > p z p z w > W �Wy w > E U) W" > m FC �. U _ <: - 4 U FC U 4 U W F > U) E z W H O O O O H cn U) H E- U) a s z z W w U W Q' H p O . m) CD H c > � > m r �D vw N c to � � u> �o �o � z z £ Ln M r r (n M H p H D ID c M M N N �D r f._. Imo- ^ r r H z O O N N H H W v; lD �o �D �D p r ID r r .H H N N c, (�; N N N H x a z a < m w m a E O O w E a' O N O O O o O O N O O G G O O o o N W O O O co o O O O o O G O O O 01 m C) � ) CD CD CD O CDLo �) O O U „ G O O O Ln O z M O CD O ,n m D 0) O 01 O O O O O cc; _,1,0 tD N N O r �D w lD N lD lD r r lD ID N N N .: N N N lD E-E z M N V' O c c H N H O c c C O O O N D Ln O O O .n Ln N O O O O c o O O O O O N N 0) O C G O o O N U U '-1 H H lD H ri H H r-1 .--� O '..`� In O H F� O o O M o C) O o o ) M C O a a a x M O O o U U o m u) >4 H H Pam. F W a a H H w a s H a U) N E `� `� a w a << o W E £ a U O a s a s W H a w w 0.al H W E z z E N d O a W < DA W O O W E p p N a< O u) z w a z z a C) D FC H O O O U U FC U) z x h a a a s ££ 3 E 4. W z O > o (D 0 0 Cl C) C) C) c) D O N u O Ln ,n H H O O >, U E+ H U) o m o W M a o z 0 z 0 D c) .� p W U H D W H O D D U U W 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. C. �n 4 ,-. H H �. H H .� -4rA V 0 C) 0 0 0 CD 0 o H' l 0013 z 4 a 0 r DD OD OD M DD O Lo H Ln o m - m N IT M m C m N m w m r m D 01 N N (1)D Lo v' ON Ol O O E-F Z N 0 O H N rn N H W S U E-E Q1-4 Ol N .-1 E+ Ql N E Ol N El VD N � E �D N � E+ 01 N H 11 01 N H E+ Ql N r-. F+ O) N H E Q1 N H E+ Ol N .--I E-H Ol N E 01 N E+ ON N .-� [-4+ LD N H E. t0 N H E lo N rH r 01 N 1+ � N El a a M M E p O �--i W O O <F Ol �D O O (n co N �--� N l0 r-1 N o O O cD (N N r O O O O O N O) �o O O w E �+ Z O O O O O O .-i H O N VJ 0 r N v' W N O O N 0 r1 I O N M r c w 0 .-1 cF M M S R' m a ul H 0 a' O r w Lf) N �o N a O if) O O N N Lr) OD r O O O O ON r .-� Ln O O O r M m co DD M O H H � a > > w u) u) E v) W H O > z H z O H W H a U co w o a a E+ O E a O 0 z w > u) z (D H E+ U w h 0> a w a a E O E-E a O 0 z W w z O x fL U) v) w .4 w a H 3 w z O S a (o u) w .] w a> H 3 a a F 0 E+ a O 0 z w u) W H r7 w w 0 U to W H .-7 w al 0 W fn W H .1 w a, 0 (n W H .] u, w 0 W u) W H .7 w w 0 W O W H .4 w w 0 to (n W . " w a, =) to cl) W H 4 w a =) cn u) W H .4 w a 0 n cf) W H .7 w w> 0 m a a E+ 0 E a O 0 z w m w a> H F a E+ 0 E 4 a O 0 z W O F U 0 a E (0> z H a a E-E O ElO a O 0 z w F U 0 a E u)> z H a F+ 0 E CC O m z w a It Z O H F S E n U) .7 w w> Q .a a a E 4 0 E a O 0 z W E 0 U d U' z H F m w EE w w U W H 0 O > I Z H O H > Z H a W W Z O Z N QD m m 01 O N O N O N N �o �D rn o to -- � Q m m rn o to H OJ m M rn H O H w N o o � v M r 07 W m M m m r m M w H m M r OD c w Ql m r W o m N M r m O rn r N N r r O r Ln M m T M m m LO N N O Ali cH S H In N O W O M O M N O � c N N H H `.G a z n co m w w a I 0 O w E a W p7 O O O O O O O l0 l0 N O S O O 0 O O 0 O o 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O N O DD O O O O k) kO N u) ul N IT Ln O H co O O O O O O Z Ln O u7 M In M m O O O O O O O O M O •-1 O O) H o) O m O M O r C 01 O F Z O 0 N o r N .--I r M to r M Ln H N H '-1 Ln v - H r - L7 M H n M - to M - o M M u) H Ln M .-I O Lo N O N N O N M �o H N In M a' o) D U U rL O H o o O O H O o O O O O O o o O O O Q' N N - H - .-1 H H In (n U) z z O O M H H U W () O << U U U U U U U U U U H FC < LO U U z z z z z z z z z z a s a, H H H H H H H H H H H H W x a fM1� H F F F E+ E F F F E E I £ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E a FC Z z < U E E as w w a, w o. w a, a, as a E H H W F O 00 W W w W W W W W w w w �:C F E F r] z a U U 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O U) IL E, z z O r a z w W U U U U u U U U U U x W w a < a F E-E H H H H H H - F-1 H H Y S 7 a< O z x x w w w w w w G. w w 44 a v w w W a 0 O w w [ w L�. w 44 1. w 1. 1. 41 < 0 x x cn z a z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a z F E+ E W Z 0 > O O O Co io ul ul if) Co in uN Co Ln O to O O O o H o o O CD O o O O O O M N O N N O o C) 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o CD.H o 0 E. U E. 3 X X G. [a. Cu W G, G. w G. G. G. a a H H H U H a w w w w w w w w o4 w w w < a H a s a U z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a w O 0 O W. a 0014 O O O Ln in w an r Ln OD in V' O LO o 01 LI) to O r O m o m O O N O E. O z O H O H Na) H W x V F N o) N o) N w N to N l0 N 10 N 01 N 01 N 1D N m N o) N m N m N m N m NI £ E F .-/ F r-1 F F- F F- E E- F H r- E a a w M M E N v O N O O O O O u7 O O O O O O O N d> O O O O O O O O O O O O O z W £ Y. E z O O N in m N N r r m w m r M v o O O m O .--i M Ot N a' O NC, O O O O N O Q\ O M W R( O p N O O Ln O O O O O O O N m O .-1 N N V7 m H u7 O O O m O .--1 tf) N ID N m z m of M O O E. a FC U z a V > a < a < W £ a a a a OH F a < a < a < W w w w w w W w W w U > z o E. o O £ E. O m m E. O E. o x F o F O < F E+ o m W F+ o ru £ F o W O H F E+ £ O E �4 U J4 U E x 00 x E-F O W E x O E+ H U F W [.+ E E U U U U U V H O f]. H x O U x O W x W x x 0 F U E U x O W x O F V Z O U x O C7 x O (n x O W x W W x W x W x W x > z x U ❑ Z E-E 14 Cl z U U ❑ z O a 0❑ a z U < ❑ z O x ❑ Z I --I w ❑ z z H ❑ Z £ O ❑ z U U U U U U H m w W > £ a> W Z a z a> W F m F m> W E-F m> W F m>> W L4 W d4 o> W E-H m> W z a z a z a z a z a z a m ❑ w x a a s s z H z H o (L z H E o m o V a (L a P, a LL a of a LL a LL w m ly ❑ x o m N O H M M ti O m v ul > I > Lp N O N M N to O M O M O N O �O o l0 o z H ❑ z H £ O N M r O w O r !L o• M 1 I I I I I I 1 H ❑ Z r (+) ID� N N H W m M N N O N O N O N O N O N O N O a z a 4 m W m a 1 O o E. F x w m m r m r Ln Lr) r u) Lr) N rn m N M m O o o N rn ui O o o r m o o v Ln v Ln c uo c uo c m c ur) z rn rn rn rn rn Ln rn rn rn C) cD C, v) u7 C) C) z o 0 0 ko 0 io o �o v o 0 0 0 r 0 0 ID 0 0 0 kD o �o F z O H O N N N u) N O N O M Ln O L O N Ln u1 u1 ul ul N O U M C V' N N H N M M H M M M M M M o .-+ 0 H 0 r-1 0 r-1 0 H o r1 0 f-I 0 H 0 '-1 0 H o r-1 o ,� 0 H o H o r--1 0 •-1 x cn [u w U w U w U w U w U w V U £a > > > > > > H FC rWr�1 m m m m m m M o m z z O z O L7 1 0 1 FC m m u 0 0 0 0 0 0 In o H m a m s H £ H £ E N E-F N E. a W z " z H z H z H z " z H a RC E FC W z W z x m x m z O z O z O m m x W x W a W x W x W x W I U H U U <C x O U W x O U O U O x W z W z W z W z W z W z a' WE, z O H x H x W W U + d O V 1 1 0 .4s 0 > x H x m x m x m x z z z z z z < x rL m r> m x x x x W W H W W O a O a O a O a O �a O a a m Q z > a o4 U U w a a a x x x m m m m m m E w z O O W > O O O N O N u1 M in m o O o ti N o O in N O O o O o O O O O O O O O �+ U E U " H a > O m O m < O m O m < O m W x N w H O > H x H > H x M > H x ri x < m ri x f.� m rl x < m f-1 x < m H x i� m x < m r.( U LL x x x 0015 Z N M O .-i C' N LO �o r O H M 01 OD N O E z O \ N H w S U F 01 N 01 N l0 N l0 N 6 N l0 N CT N 01 N 01 N Ol N 01 N l0 N 01 N 01 N CD E 4 co F F EH F+ F H E E E+ EF F E F F F a a M M El z E O O O O O CDN c C ID c N l0 .-� M M O V) O O O ul W z O O Ln O to O N Ln M m H r N v Ln V' r N N a' r-I O L m M OD N �+ < 0 M N r N m a � O O O O O O V' O \O M O O O O O .-1 O L) O N U') Cl) N H N I a' r N N a' O LL N £ OD M w r-1 N M cli� N r ~ (N H m ID W C7 F U) a o 0 U > a Ft to W 0< a a a U) x a FC < P. a < a 4 a a < E U) .] Ft U) w 0I�c U) a w w a 4 U) D: H z 0 to &I O ❑ F O F 0 fY. FC E O 0z w F Q E. O F O U > E. 0 E+ x E 0 ❑ E+ 1u 0 EL. F. 0 RC a W H x E Cl. E. a E-H GL E U F E+ E U) F H F (L H 14 E+ DW H O a H w S a O m U) x O o U a O x O o: O o to z O va W cn W M w a 0 m w a 0 a w x 0 a s O x U) a \ 0 U x O W > z a U L) ❑ z a W ❑ z O Z ❑ Z E. ❑ Z \ E-F ❑ Z H a H a H❑ a z H a ❑ z H ❑ in z F W D z a❑ w z z H O Z a U H U) w z < W > m i W > H to W > W a, W > U) z W > GL W a4 a aL a W > !L a W > IL E W > w o; w > W w E > cn W > U) ❑ a W W £ z H < E O U O U) O❑ U) U) O M O U E+ U1 W E W E+ W > w w H O a. \o I r-I o O r to I ❑ O > I > w CO ID O N O) U) m \ N O .--I M CO I O z H ❑ H z H a z I N r n N Q' N ID On a) �o - m W - r O w r 1 NCD (n a' m N CD\D On to ❑ H x O a N M M FC z a FC a) W ca a 1 Q 1 o w F x W r o CDLn N o O M Ln C O o CDw H 0 O C) O M Ul o O 0 O 0 N Q] Ln Ul O � O � CD CDm O to ul O N �O O z U7 O W 01 c o m O io M O r m O ID M O r M O r M O r Ol O o 01 O Ol O o a) v` 0 01 O 0 01 .--i 0 E z .n N H c M H M v N M r m O O LO rn LO M O N ul N m N N O N in H L a' O N r O .n N m \O O Ln U U FC. rl O H O .-1 O r-1 O rl O .-i O H O H O H O N O Lf) e-1 O Q' rl C H H O V' H O un H U U (7 < H > H H < a a W U) Z O i O F U H U H M H a U) (f) z z o � u w M 0 a w Cx) a r.4 a W Q E H G. z a a a U) 3 E+ H W H F O w E I W z F ❑ H E O E FC z a z s z w w z O a W O W E a z C7 z U U) w ❑ U) H E. H Cu H G. w f1 H H U) E U) U z ❑ z F O Q W w H W w w w a 3 3 w a U) >+ a a a �C a O z o x F< m w cn H 0 z O F U) w i E x F a F a s E H x E D x F 0 x H 0 x F O - z < a ❑ 4 U O w < £ E O O O O E. CO H 1a z w cn U) a U) h u) cn rn rn rn U) U) U) cn z 0 ❑ > o O Ln O o O 0 N 0 N 0 .-1 0 H C. r-1 o N r O m O o Ln o O Ln V' O N H e-1 r-I O O O O O O O O O O H O O (� E. U H r.0 U FC (n U U) U U) W U) H U) co co W U) O U) O to U) U) co 0016 z N C L v lD ul l0 r M O1 co O '-+ N m - N �v t0 N �o N N N N N N M M m M m N O EI z O .--1 \ N N 'A x U d\ l0 LO Ol 01 01 01 01 H w F N N N N N N N N N N N r-1 N rl N H N H N N H El E E E E- E- E- E E-1 F E E- El E.H E. a w a m m F f-i r M If) 01 N M O O r m m O a O O M m Ol a M M O O O O O O O O z w E z H r-1 m N r m u7 N O .ti H O) O N O N E �-1 O O H M N r-1 c O .-1 c N m v' 0) c O In .-i M Ln M H'n ID m r M m H N N a lD N M O M O m 0\ (n m Q1 m m a) r) � N C u7 r lf) 0) r U) H O O O U) ❑ !M H Ol H n m Q7 M m O v ❑ Ln a m r-1 H W F N U co U) x a a a s a a 3 x a F U a a a v v v u H a' !S. H Q. < U) co U) < 0 < > a < < > > > > z 0 < a F+ 0 F 0 < a. H 0 F WWWP 0 m 0 m 0 f. E+ 0 "El U O F O F O U) M M M W U H E+ W a E E w a F a O E- x x x W W E+ -1 W E. F F z O z O z O z O H O a H w a 0 U) W U) W w O w LZ O F O W. U O a u a u a z O G4 i:. 0 a < OZ O a 0 w a 0 H F H F H E H E > z a U a U ❑ z H I4 H l-a ❑ z a U ❑ z a o ❑ ❑ Z a ❑ a O a ❑ z a Q ❑ Z u cn ❑ z cn ❑ z 0 a ❑ z U w U w U w U w H U) w H x> W a a s a> W H x> w F U) W > u U U> W a z> w ❑ z> w z U> Liz W a> W a m (14 0 a U a m U) ❑ W > O (1) O Cl) W > z H Z U z u z U z < IS a H U) z z z z w U a W o O H O ❑ a W H O Ln M m r r r > Z L > 2. W D. m O (n r r r Ln H m H y .--1 rn c CD O v l0 u) u1 v) H ❑ H H z Z l0 U> LO � LO Lre)r) u1 l0 O m Q' m m m rl N r H O N .-1 N N H N H N H ❑ H x H l!) � N - r-1 H H O .-1 Ol m ri H H H RC a z � W m m I a 0 0 1. F a W O 0 O 0 O O N O O Ln In m m N o O O O m M O O CD CD O O O 0 o l0 O ID W l0 lO O O m O O O O O E O Z Ot H 0 �Ln01 o r M O) r1 O) H mM H O O) O m O _ M 0) O 0) O 0) O 0) O co ID a 1.0 � cD �D iD �D r �D �D )D )O E z H H ri H O rl ry rl N rn m Q' Q' r m V' 0 0 O N O N O N O Lr) O 0 O u) O to 0 N u) C M 0 u) V In ) m ID m l0 O r r U < O Ln O H o H 0 Lr) o H O Ln O Ln O u) o O O o O O O o U z U z U z U z W a a a H H H H r>-1 E+ ❑ a O z O fZ O a z H Z H cn H cn F cn F to F p E H U) U) Q a a a O u) x U O E+ w W U) L4 U) W U) W W E-F w ❑ PPPH a a a a a W O a U U U rC Q ❑❑❑❑ CQ H H H H u a 0 cn U) U) L 0 U) m D > a > a > a U 0 H a w x z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 W rL F E-1 ❑ - W F M W U) W cn W cn v) W cn U) a 4 < a U U U U a Co z H aC m U) z 0 w w w w E. ft Lm H w x�4 w w x w as < >i 01 U) w a w s F co H z H z H z H CQ ❑ z z W << a a Q a a a < a< Qz 0 z a a a s s a a a z a z a z u Lx x m a > w H H H H U) a ❑ z F U) F co F co u H 3 ❑ U) O CO a co 3 U) E 0 E. F U) cZ F+ a E a E a E H z w 0 W > O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O 'J 0 U >+ F C O < u) O <. Ln O a V' O 0 H O m m O z m O Z Co O z O .--1 M H O w .-+ O a O N < H O H H O H H O )--1 H O f-1 U H F F E F F O❑❑ S x 0 cG a w a a �v rt; U CO U) U) U) U) U) U) co U) E+ F F EH E E+ E-F 0017 Z l0 r m r m 01 Ol O ti N O .-/ N m l0 V' V) M N O E. z O m N W x U E a\ N m N l0 N m N 01 N at 04. l0 N l0 N l0 N l0 N O1 N m N D1 N 01 N Qt N Ol N Ol N t0 N c� E a a m ElF � F E-F 1 E-E E+ � E 4 � E+ � E � E+ � E �, E+ � F � E-F � E-F - E- - H (1) E+ 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O .-+ M o O o o r M if1 O M H rn ifl m r ul m N N o 1D 0 O Z W E F Z D N r-1 v' r O O O O O O N N O N D� M m m m M r-i ID l0 N m .-i r r r lfl . r Ln >� O N r N v N V M a O O O O O O O O O M O a N N m lD m c r O ur O 0 O 0 O Ln N W w O m N d' m N N a N a D F+ a N m a U > a a m a a E x a a z D a w a a a E E a s >> a z O m E. O �4 0 E+ 0 W a E O G. F O z EE O FF O E O U E+ O m m E. O W U �-+ E4 Z O E-F a E E+ .a Elx m E Z a E. F a O E 4 a E Z O Z O E+ Ha, O H H E a O z o x 0 + a a O a U s o D 0 Z 0 m w a 0 E U D; O m w m w m w m w m w m W a a a 0 H E H H O: O m w > z D: U U❑ w z U n z E O z > ❑ z E❑ z H❑ a z D❑ % z WHHH O a a a H a H a H a x❑ z U w U❑ W z H a H m w a m> w E m> w as a> w E F> W w a> w a a> w E m> w E o a a a a a a a a o. D. a' a >-' E> W .a a .a a> w a a U) ❑ z H w a O m W a O u O m Z H x a D m D m D m O m D m D m H U 00 U U ❑ m w W U w H ❑ a r m O N ' N N O > I > W m o o �D rl In m uO m r m m -W m m c m m Ln m r Ir m o) in O o) ifl in z H in H Z H E O z Ln N H I ID w D1 O M O F m O O m O 0 m O O O O O O O O O O O O r N �D O ❑ H x .-� o r 3 o O o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 a z a a m w m a I 0 o w E x w LD Ln r m o O 0 O r Ir Ir c N at 0 O 0 O 0 o O O o O O (D O O O O o 00 0 N (3) Qj in lD O O LO m Lf) O O O O O O O O O O if7 m m m m DN a) z o lD o lD c �D o r O lD o 0 0 r 0 r �D \D o r 0 r 0 r 0 r o r N W V' N o lD E. z D N N N O m Ln H H O v' Ln N O .--I O r-I O M Ln .--i N N O N O N O M Ln .-I .-I O O N O O U a' N M cf N N N N N N N r-I r O N U r.� O 0 o O H o H 0 H 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 .4 H 0 H 0 U W x W x m F F M E+ Z a >+ >+ >+ >1 >+ O O O O a E-E a O (Z H E H E H E H E+ H E-E H F H F+ H F H E E+ Ln a .a D U z E m C7 z J4 m Z D z D z D z D z D z D Z D z D z W Z W 4 G. a m z H c> W W w H m D m E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E w E W D m I a O U Z w E-E m F Z E H E D z 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U C7 a C7 s ❑ O m H x z a F W < C .] a a > z z z z z z z z z z 0 3 N a 0 > W H ��. E w w H 0 a a i'� a a > a G�.1 .7 z Fa.. F E. m a s a o ❑ H a D D m z 0 a a a a z w .4 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m a m s m w m Z E FF D E > > ❑ 3 S S 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ❑ F Cv Z O D O w > o H O .--1 O w f-1 O O r O o N 0 N O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 .� 0 o U El D a z a a a a a 1a a .a m U a U a E x E+ m D a > > > a > aa 3 3 3 3 3 aaa 3 3 3 3 s 3 o 3 0018 Z c n r w rn r1 r r c c c O H Z N C. O H c \ i N U c) 0) cy) ra W E. N N N N N E Q Cl H H F F H a. a M o r o 0 0 M H r ko 0 o rn Z H W Z r c M Ln o � O M N > O ID c N c a £ N M a r� o Ir Cl 0 0 O M O O M r N M N O M O N c c M cn 0 0 cwi� cwn 0 0 OH 0 w H H E. H x EH H w a a a x u) a w x m a H O O W O = O W O > m p CL' 4L' p H p U p H a Z U Z W W Z a Z Z a z H (n W H H w rL w z w w w w > a n> a> r> a> p o o E co H a m N M O W N Ln M > 1 > m a1 c O ID O Z Z x N N u-) N H in H :D N N Lr) H Z cr) a O N o p O O M O O H J4 Qi Z W r� w w a I o o w F (Z c c o r M W o o o c M C1 ID �o o u) co E O\ f-I Cn M 2 o C, o O o 0 io ID r ID r E+ Z M M c M O N Ln Ln Lf7 Ln O rl r-I V' M G' U H Ft; O O O cD O O W U H > a w U � Z M H o Z Z C7 o O O Z n FI 1--I H W a H H rx H �a h a z w 1 O O z O a0 Z z ..4 z U U F W H w r� 0 a s En 0 a ° N u) z x x x H Gu W z 0 > o 0 0 0 0 o a-) O Ln O >4 o 0 0 .-+ o U H W W z O FC U X X X > N %.R 0019 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 10:45AM 12/06/02 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 51973 12/06/02 CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 1049.72 51974 12/06/02 CAL167 CALPERS LONG-TERM CARE 26.31 51975 12/06/02 CAL245 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 38020.69 51976 12/06/02 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 592.98 51977 12/06/02 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 689.91 51978 12/06/02 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 426.50 51979 12/06/02 STA044 DARREN STANLEY 62.50 51980 12/06/02 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 176.00 51981 12/06/02 UNU050 UNUM LIFE INS 2577.58 CHECK TOTAL 43,622.19 02t 0020 z Ol r-1 10 r m N t`'1 V' 1n O � a O E+ Z N O O \ N x U (3) rn rn rn rn rn rn 0) ,--1 W E- 0) a, a) 0) a)m a)m m 0i m U a) rn 0) 0) a)a)0)m m � CD E H N F E F E F F F rn N m CD O CD m 01 o E r m m 0)rn 0) Ln o n r z F. w z Ol lO v' 1n N 01 l0 N 1D r N E O v' N C r 0) m N w rr r N O o m 1n v , 1n \O r N a W M c N H 0) m r-1 O O O m r M l0 m O1 1n 1l O 1n a• l0 O N O 0) ❑ 10 < N w r r7 c a N W N m Z) m N E W r r < 1n H a to m �+ N O I z rn a H 3 U w w z W .] ❑ w £ U rt U H H W w E N z .a a H 1-7 .] Od .4 a .a a 4 1E-1 .7 r7 c� a❑< a • a a< a< z< a a z z E 4 E O W E+ F 4 E 4 C7 E-F 0 F o E E a O D O I O En O O I O I O 1 O 1 O to O W H N EH E z\ E. E E F El E- Z E+ U E z S4 H W N >a sa N H H a H a 4� a w a to a JJ a JJ a 4-1 a 4-1 a a O H o N o .a i-4 O z o to o N o w o (no ❑ o > a z ❑ H ❑ < ❑ H ❑ ..-1 ❑ ..i ❑ -..I ❑ -H ❑ E- ❑ Z U O z ❑ z U z z z ❑ z ❑ z ❑ z ❑ z .7 Z H m H W w H H W W w W Di w w \ w W to > a > ❑ E > ts+ > a > a > a > a > ❑ > 1 O H \ w ❑ H \ \ \ \ E+ U) > a E< a a a a a m ❑ U tw] Q o a H ❑ a d O a O W c c > I > a 01 r l0 W z z £ - H M rn m H ❑ H O O 1n 1n lO m 1 H z .-+ M m Ln m O ❑ O m o E-F H x � z a CQ m w w a 1 0 o w F+ a O O O O Cl O o o O O W O O O O O O O O O O (Tj O O O O O O O O O O E z m n r r� ,-I z fh m (1)M O M N N (N N N (mil m N N N 1D N N N N N N E. Z O o o c o O O O O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .--I O O O O O O U U r1 H H H H H H H H H < O o 0 0 0 o O O O o W ❑ H O w H a a a W W W >>4 U twig Oa U) U >+ >+ z E ❑ Oa Oa O Z £ a E w w o O a a s o w ❑ x Ln H W E E u1 E-F a W E. w w to > >4 Q H I < E+ EH W 44 U > 0 U U H z 14 O z I z H H W U U z H < < O a a w < >1 W E H .a W Pa H < W E < w .7 z z ❑ 5 .] F+ ❑ m 3 114 Gq H a m a s z H H rt o O a a H to z ❑ a 01 ❑ o a w w Q a rC o a a a .4z > a H n a ❑ 4 a a< < < H z z m z U U U U U .7 a ❑ o 0 E k W z O > o r 1n n o 0 o c 1n o 'O 1n 1n R' V' O lf) O >+ O .-1 N N O O O O O O U F .l 1-7 4 4 z Od > < H o U H < Q. < < < < H F z z < U U U U U U 4 a W o O 027 0021 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 1:57PM 12/05/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 51935 12/05/02 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 150.00 51936 12/05/02 AD0010 DON ADOLPH 2O0.00 51937 12/05/02 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 200.00 51938 12/05/02 BAR010 KATIE BARROWS 200.00 51939 12/05/02 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 51940 12/05/02 BRI090 KIRK BRIGGS SIGNS INC 200.00 51941 12/05/02 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 51942 12/05/02 CAL080 CA SOC MUNCIPAL FINANCE 35.00 51943 12/05/02 CAL235 CALIF OUTDOOR GRAPHIC 200.00 51944 12/05/02 CAT040 CATERING BY SHARON 4000.00 51945 12/05/02 CEJ100 FRANK R CEJA 200.00 51946 12/05/02 FRI090 FRIENDS OF PATRICK 200.00 51947 12/05/02 GRA075 GRAPHIC RESOURCES 1661.40 51948 12/05/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 17818.29 51949 12/05/02 IMP012 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 1000.00 51950 12/05/02 IRWO20 BARBARA IRWIN 50.00 51951 12/05/02 JAN100 RICHARD JANDT 200.00 51952 12/05/02 KIR010 TOM KIRK 150.00 51953 12/05/02 KIT100 RUSSELL KITAHARA 200.00 51954 12/05/02 LAQ125 LA QUINTA FLOWER GALLERY 538.25 51955 12/05/02 LAQ175 LA QUINTA HS CHOIR 200.00 51956 12/05/02 MAU050 BRIAN MAURER PHOTOGRAPHY 603.40 51957 12/05/02 MIR100 MIRAFLORES L P 1958998.00 51958 12/05/02 MOU050 LESLIE MOURIQUAND HUDSON 50.00 51959 12/05/02 NAN200 BEN NANCE 2505.00 51960 12/05/02 PET005 CASH/PETTY CASH 149.34 51961 12/05/02 POW300 POWER PERSONNEL INC 9836.66 51962 12/05/02 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 50.00 51963 12/05/02 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 150.00 51964 12/05/02 RUW001 R.U. WELDING 1600.00 51965 12/05/02 SHA050 ARCHIE SHARP 50.00 51966 12/05/02 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 102.74 51967 12/05/02 SPRO10 SPRINT 56.95 51968 12/05/02 TH0200 DAVID THOMS 50.00 51969 12/05/02 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 51970 12/05/02 VER200 VERIZON 3781.27 51971 12/05/02 VER210 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION 69.95 51972 12/05/02 WRI050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,005,856.25 028 0022 z Ln M c ul cr m O N H N f- E O z N O N O \ N H W x U H C7 £ C7 £ w U' £ w C7 £ w C7 E w U £ w U £ w C7 £ w C7 £ w U' £ w C7 £ w C7 £ w E a v Q a m E. E F E F F H E F. F E F 0 z w £ E. z O 0 o o In 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 O 0 0 o Ln 0 0 n M 0 0 o O Cl 0 0 O 0 0 0 O Cl 0 0 Ln >+ 0 H N N N N N a O O O O Cl O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O if1 O O O O O O H m O U') O O O Ln Ln M O O 0 O O O O O z W H N N N W 0 N H N 0 w O c N T \ (J H H E H F H W a E H L7 W W Cu E H W (iJ E. H x a a z E. £ m O a v1 O a m O a Q V m cn 0 a z H £ 3 W m O a O 0 x N O a O Q £ a Q w O a Q w o a w Q o a Q o z a Q w ❑ a Q £ a Q H > a Q w O a Q z a Q w o a Q \ a z O £ O F O z E. 0 H O z F 0 Q a E 0 z H £ 0 O H O W a E 0 z H 0 Q: w F 0 z E 0 W z W U H F U E. U H F 0 (7 H E. 0 H F \ E H C7 H H U H Q: E H H F. a O F (7 H E z H H O a H (7 z Z 0 u) Q: O m 04 m O a O U W Q' O Ul m 0 0 z 4 0 1+ Q Q: O c7 a 0 >+ Q: O m Q: O O > z Q; U Ho z z no z z 00 z on z z z E-EO H z no z H z z O z U O z on z z Q O o z 00 z z cn 0 H m w z Q W > 0 w w > 0 w W m > w W > x W > 0 W z > Q w > N o w > 5 r-4 W > H a W > 0 w W > Q: Q cn o a a w z w 94 w [L' a Q w Q: a a o N w a' 0 T w a 3 Q w V H r., W 0 z N O N O N O 0 > z 1 > z W m £ O N O N O N H 0 H H D z > 0 > O > 0 0 H x z z Z Q a z Q W m 1 m a 0 0 E w Q; w m O O O un c M Ln cr M in v M O O O Ln cr M O O O O O O in v M O O O Ln C M O O O z z O C) v' V' V.v� o .-1 m c c O H M O H c Ir M H z a u)c H o o 0 v 0 0 c o 0 in H 0 m 0 0 Ln H 0 un o o 0 o 0 0 O U c O O O c O c H O N O Q o C) 0 0 0 0 c) 0 0 o O O O O U z W U z Q U H m E+ M o H co z H r T a Q z 0 Q Q CD N a 0 H a a Q u x a Q co a cn 3 H m w a a H a 0 V) Q a Q i Q w m T Q O z E H C7 E 0 U z 0 0 >+ m h W > W a E 2 Q a a .] Q a Q m m C7 H m O E H O CJ U Q a m Q >• H O Ol m w a O O Q U a Q m w 0 m a m o Z Q V 0 0 w z H a w x a w x Q a .Q7 a O a < 0 0 H E a H tY x H u) H a v w E z Q u Q u)z F+ Cu W h o m a� m x a u u w o z O 0 > O 0 r1 0 Ln 0 0 O 0 Q) 0 0 m un M o v' o O M 0 V V >+ H H O w m O O o O U a O % Q m 0 O H Cr O H o O a Q N a Q O H Q H h w O Q 0 Q U Q Q Q m m m m U U U U U 0023 z N M c Ln W r M M o .-+ N M c Ln r r R4 N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M a o E-F Z N 0 O \ N N x U V' C� U' C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' C.� C7 (7 C7 U' U t7 W E £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ C7 4 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W £ RC m E- F F E E+ H F E H E F E E E E+ F+ F E+ a o. v 0 O O .n .n M l0 O c 01 01 N m rn O O O C. O ,-i F o L+') o o r o N o r o O o 0 0 W z o N 01 r H M M N N to O O O O O £ � o u� c �o r c m ,w c Ln ID c Q o Ln O >+ O N to m N c to M M O N N <4, o O o O O O O O O 7 N Q C. O O O O 00 E+ O O O O .n O 0 H H O Z Ln O Ln N to m z O O N H r r =) H H £ E £ rc E-F OU a H 0 E-E H (1) z H W O E £.4 a w a a a a 4 z o a a a m Z E+ E E+ U U U U U U F u) E a. El E. E O O z 0 O U U U U U>>>>>> O w o O z O 0 0 z W H E U E+ E+ > > > > > M M W M u) M F+ W E-F a E+ C7 E-E U E 0 m mm U) m H a Qi C. C. U U U U U U C C. U cz C. (!) QL O H O O co O U U U U U H H H H H H O H O H O O z 0 > C. ❑ 0 ❑ C. ❑ H . H H H z a a C cl. C. ❑ U ❑ a Cl ❑ ❑ H ❑ ❑ z U z z Z W Z a a 0: a z H F E E E H Z W Z O z z z z Z Z H co W O W Z W E H H E-E E+ U U U U U U W z W F+ W o W Z W 0 W > E. > z> W W W W W W W W W W W > z> u) > > Q> W ❑ w Kc a a a a a a a a a a a O H w a W cn a m w w w w w w w w w w w U x Ix a a w w U W M H H CO N N m to r .n O O O O W O O O O O O D 5 �o H co 0 0 > 1 > m O O O O O O O O� Q o v N N Z z £ H H H H H H H F-1 r-I H H iK H ❑ H ',i a s W Z % a a z O N N LL > > H z 4 Q<<<<< a O o o u) O O ❑ > > > > > > > > u-) Ln Ln U z z H x a z C4 ry m w m a 0 O o W E O m N M v' L!) l0 M O .-I O M O Ln O .n W C' N O H m l0 D to �0 .n O �o .-1 O m M m O to to I0 to to �o In Q w 10 Ln O M O M rn m .� z c O N N N N N N N O N N N O O V' O v v l0 w w �o l0 t0 to to l0 .o w \o to in to C E. Z O M V' c v a' v V' W N O D O Ln Ln Ln Ln In In to In m O L7 Ln 01 O O o O O O N d` d' w V' C' C' v' to N v' v' ID U ry o (D 0 0 0 c) 0 c) 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 c) 0 0 F+ F+ H E+ H E+ E-F H H H H H v? cr) H H H H H H H H H H H H M x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q U co H H H H H H H H H H H H O H W E-E E F+ E E+ E-E E H HE E+ F. E+ L a U a a a a a< a a a a a < o. E a U U C9 C9 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 U Q H H H H H H H H z E T. a o a a a a a a a a a a a c4 H ❑ r1 i u) x a a o x rx rx a a a a a 3 z E-E W F a z a a a a a a 1 a .] a s a m H U) U a ❑ H H H H H H H H H H H H H c4 H a r a < a z W x GL a W a W a W m W a W m W a W a W ox W a W cz W a W Q co a S W cn a < O H D. a. u. 04 a. w 0. a, n, a. o. 0. a U £ u) a ❑ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ < H o D cn z F-I H H H H H H H H H H H m C. EE C. E E. w z O > O .n O O O O O O O o O O O N O O O O Q 01 r H H H H H H H H H H H N O H O O O O O O O CD O O Cl CDC) O O CD O O H O H 0 p U E H 9 n. a nl a a a a a a a a n. 3 Z a F. U H < U Ci k. 0 £ H £ H £ H £ H £ H £ H £ H £ H £ H £ H £ £ Ci < H H 0024 z W m O ti N M c N u) "O r DD m 0 — N M C M M V' C' V' V' c .-1 ci' V' ct' C V' ul ul u) Ln Ln 0 E Z N O N O M S C7 (7 (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 (7 C7 C7 C� C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 N U E. £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ C� a W W W W W W w w W W W W w W W W W w £ a E EE E F E F E F+ F F E. E F F E. E E. E. a a cD 0 N O O O O O O O O O O c O O <P c N O ,-y E N O a' O O O O O O o r to O O N W N W Z F . w z aD o M o 0 o co o LO o orn rn o o rn rn rl cr £ O M O O O O o a) Ln Co .-1 (O N N N M M v N N Q to N l0 O O O (Y) u) r r •-1 O) a O O an M N H p O Ln r M c N N O u') O O H O O O c O N O C O O O M O co O M W W w W m O a Ln 01 O M o z O W w w w m z � a O Q' N N O (D 0 (D U' co O H > N ~ a a a a o a 0) a cncf) u) u) co cn w U 0 (7 (D 0 H > F a s a a a a cn H z z z z H U U U U U w D ❑ H H H F-I W £ 3 O w co cn cn u) cn a > > > >+ �+ .] O i-7 s .] ❑ .7 D D D D 14 W .] W i-7 E. F F. F F .] O O O O a a s a s E F F E. F a z Z E+ a E+ S x s S E a F F W w w w w F U U U U 0 0 0 W O w 0 0 0 U O a a a a a 0 > > > > W H E-F W E+ a E-F F E+ w w w w E .�l E+ ❑ E E. cn m w to U E-H cn O z 4 a .4 i-7 a i-7 w w W w w "a a D a a w a W m m W a U a W a m cn cn m cn a HE -pp O > H a O ❑ 0 = 0 ❑ >+ a O ❑ U O a ❑ ❑ a ❑ a ❑ a ❑ 0 ❑ H a 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ a D a D a D a D a D 0 ❑ u u ru u Z U z z ❑ Z U z a a a a z O z Z Z m m m m m z (CGS H cn W z w H (4 H W 0 0 0 O W E-E W D W £ £ £ £ £ w E E F F W > w> .] > >> W W W W > c/% > W > H H H H H> z z z z p a Q W W w w w w O O O O (n o x U a a a a x a a a a a a u U U U W W N Lr) H ❑ a O cD O) 01 Ln �o O > I > CO N I W O m OD z z £ O M M M M H ❑ H D > H O O O O H z 0 N O O O O p z O E+ El EH E H x a z a a w w m a I o 0 W F a O O O .--I H m D7 O O O O N O o Ir o c O W O O M r r Ln O cDO O N CD CD m O M o fit O O Lf7 t0 l0 n u1 CD cD O CD O O Ln �f) O In O D M M O) Co m O\ m M N M r u) M Lc)o M z O O O o cD cD o to o O r O O O M o o O O r r (o co co co w �o vn (N N c r �o r ID Ln �o u) �o E z .-1 H r-1 M c") M M rl O O N .-I M N w rl l0 D O O u) m DD DD co O O O O N In L u•7 N n N O N N N (D �o �o to c O O N N N U U a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cD 0 0 0 o o o 0 o > > z a x o w a cn a ❑ x z z z M (D a O z o H F ❑ H H H H o� E4 z x < s s x s s a a a a a 3 U a a a a a D mm rn m mw w w' w a O a co a a a a a a H a U a U a U a U a U z z z z z z z z m m m m WE, a a D w w w w 0 W E E F E F a a w z .4 z E E a a a a a E U E E (-+ E+ E+ w w w w cq H < D z H z H E 0 .1 0 a 0 a 0 17 w z a w a w s w a w a w s a a a a >. Ol D D z ul W W W H z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a s s x s s w w w w a, a 0 H a a a a u) z cn cn cn (n (n 3 S 3 S ra ❑ a a a H H H H w w a a a a a 0 0 0 0 cn z a a w ££££ a m U U u u (.) a a a a E+ W W Z O > u) Ln o 0 0 0 0 cD 0 v n un u-) O O O o D N r Ln o 0 cD cD o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q >+ r-1 O H O N o o O o O M M M U E U H OI a O+ o a D a z a H z a H a H z a H D 0 z a F W F w F w F w E W S O S 0 3 O a U 1-1 14 i ££££ £ z a a a a a a a a 0025 z rt N n l0 n r o m o m Ln 0 �o H a m ID H r H N o M ID N M C a E-E O Z N O N O N w x U E- C7 C � C7 C7 i.7 C7 C7 C7 C7 (.7 U' C7 U' (.'J :.� C.•J CD £ Q Q m W F W FF W E+ W F W H w F W F w F W F W F W F W E w E-E W E+ W E w F a a c 0 H E n r Lo Ln m M o m o m m N m 0 o o 0 O 0 O o c r an rn o o o o r c � z M O O O O N l0 O O T £ >+ O Q O O M O C' N N m N m •--� 0 c w in Ln H O l0 u o •-1 Ln Ln In H m Q a H H H w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c r Ln rn o o 0 0 to M m Z O O Ln O •n H U U O O to Z O O N O H to Ln H m W O •n O Lfl •-y E+ Q > E Q W a z a Q Z (n £ w Uwj u) £ a Q w a a Q £ a Q U H a Q W a a Q a Q a Q 0 z a Q £ 1 Q Z 0 U > U > U > U > U > U > U E. O 0, E+ 0 £ 0 F+ 0 > a E+ 0 n. H 0 H 0 FF 0 Q a E. 0 £ 0 F 0 W H m m m m m m > F a F U H W F a H H E. --E. OE- O > H a rU U U U U U E+ 0 H O Z O C7 O H O U > O m O w E. 0 z 0 m a fx PG rx a z 0 z z z H Z O Z cn Z W z Z z z W W" u) W HHHHHHHW z Z z z z z z> F m> W Z Q> W OW a> E+ m> W m> W z O> w x U> W z Q> w z O m 0 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U H x a Pa W 3 H x Q C7 x W a Q a P. 7C U. w w H 0 a m O r m m o) w N O N O N O m M 01 M N O N O m 0 > I > W m 01 m 0 m Ln m Lr) m in m in m M m O N O N O N r N H O O N O N OD z H 0 H z H £ O Z M O O M H M O O M O O M O O M O O M O O > O > O > 0 N T 01 m M m > O > O M H F F F E F F Z z z o .-+ z Z Ln Q Z a Q m w m a 1 o o w F a W cT M v m M m O o cy M C M o O O O M in O O O O O O O O o O O O m in Ln N N N O �n �n O O �n O O O O O O O Ln In Ln to M to N Ol Ol r Q) Ol i n z O u� O Ul O �n O Ul O ID O in O in c In o Lf1 O lD O Ln N �D m (o �o O Ln O in M l0 E-E rl N H M O 0 Ln d O C u1 VT �n N �n Ln Q Ln V ul N O V O V m M to O C CD N �1 H (D O C O C N H U U H H H H H H H H H H rl H H Q O O O C) O Ci O O O O O c) O O O O O O O U M Z Z Z z Z Z Z m O O H H H H H H H Q C7 Ln w w w w w w w w 44 a Q z z z z z z z z z z z z z z E. z z C7 t1 H a w .7 Q 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m w O H m z H a Q Q U m £ a• E-E W E a Z a w a w a w a w a w a w a w P. m o c a x m z O x H a CL P. W W W CL a a a S W W ElE.F O N a a a a a a a a Q W H x z 0 a N Q w Q a 0 W 3 W 3 W 3 W 3 w 3 W 3 W 3 H a > w m x U H O H a H > W m H a a m 0 z O a O 0. O a O w O a O y O a' E. m a a Q 0 m a, m Q W O a W > F G+ z 0 0 w > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o Ln o 0 o c O H o o 0 0 0 l Q ?+ U E+ M 3 M 3 M 3 M 3 M 3 M 3 M 3 o t*] - m O 3 O o Q O U O a N O o a N 2 a U H Q U 0 L4 0 L4 0 0l 0 w 0 d 0 IL 0 at 0 tL O a O a x m 0 m a m x F+ r E-F W > 0026 z Ln w r m m o 0 a o E. z N O OW E £ E £ £ £ £ £ F H £ faA E F F El E- a. a c O m ul N c H o .-+ F r Ln M o H cn D1 O Z E+ w z H c H �o m M o £ O (N O M O) M ID Ln O N M M L4 r Ln O N m O H O O m 0 Z Ln r O M H F a £ £ w w W W U cn 0 0 > a a s z £ £ E. CZ E4 P. F O O 0 w z z u) a U H OH. >> > a H a a O H cn to H F w O W O H O > a Ft < o z o a o E H m z z H H z w w w W m z> o x a a z>> w E- U w r N " 0 P4 c' r W r \o M O O W c N N �D m H o > I > m a' H 0 o O M N Z z £ N M m N o M H C] H = O C H V' Q' O > H Z Ln �o r w �o M O M Lo r ul Ln z H x z a a m w m a I O o w F O O N N O O O W w O O (o M O O O m O O �O �O O O O o (n In H H N Z M M M M 0 O w �O ID l 0 l0 l0 l0 ul F •Z M M V' V' M N H 5 N N N N u'1 O O O U U H H H H H N H < O O O O O o O H H H H H N H Z O H F 0 a O M cn 0 O F Ln W F W z x a a c� W H I F a < z 3 W E+ H a z m FC 0 0 0 0 0 O H >+ co N N N N N N a !� w H H H H H H [a] w a O z z z z z a m a a co z > > > > > > F Cu W z 0 > o 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 Ln O N N N N N N O H 0, U Ga] W [a,] W W a > > > > > 3 Ln N 0 O O O N a a F O EF F z W E r a w I �33 0027 z to r W O N i H r H i N N 9 O H z N O N O N ~ U U t7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U C7 C7 C7 C7 U' H W F E E £ E E E E £ E £ E U' RC W W W W W W W W W W W W E � m F F E H E E H H F E F E. a a rn N O O O O O O O O O O O O .--� F O O 0 O o O O O O O O 0 z E. W Z o O o O O o O O O O O O Ul O O O LO O ul (") O O O O > O N N N N N O N N a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 O O O O H O O O In O ❑ O O N O O O (n u) O N (n O O O O H N N N W N N O O N ❑ W V' w a H U (z. H (n H E. Z Ul (n u) < (n z (n O N H E-F O O O U O H 3 O O O E E a a a O a E W a x a a a W .l w .] W a ❑ r] W .7 a H a W 4 .7 w .4 W E ❑< ❑ a ❑ a z a ❑ a E a > x ❑ a z a ❑< a z E E. E. F EH < E-E E+ E E W E E. a F E O O O z 0 z 0 Z O .a O z 0 O O a 0 z 0 W O z O z W H U E. U F 0 H (7 E. E C7 H U E F+ 0 F+ a E+ C7 E. C7 U H H H H H H cl' H O H H H a co a U a U a U a (n a U a (..i a' co a a (n a (n O H z 0 O O O W O O z 0 < O O > O O > a H ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ H ❑ U ❑ ❑ ❑ < ❑ ❑ ❑ O Z U z z z Z z Z z z H Z z z z z z z z ❑ z z z Z "u) z W O W :::)w Ow x W O W z w N W O W "W O W O w a> w> w> E. > U> w> a> O> w> a> w> w ❑ r7 w w w a W a O w O w w U a a a a a a a N a S a a w w 0 0 o a o O w o O o > I > m N N (N z z £ H O H z O O O O z z z H x < z a < m w m a O O E. E-H a W E O o L 1 c Lf) c Ln v o O N c O o O o Ln c O O N V• N C• O z (D o c r rn o c rn o r o c (n o c i v E Z 00 O U In 0 V c O 0 O c o 0 O c o 00 O (n 0 c o 0 o (n o 0 v H Ln ti c O o O r H 0 N a o 0 O v O 0 O U r.� O O O Cl 0 o O O o 0 0 0 U z H w U z a z U H x o Ln a (n H a w a < < O x U a F m .a m m < m 3 a H H (n w .a El a Hu) u z a O o (n m ry w U Q a E. O z m H r.✓r O N a m w 0 .4 O ❑ a U r7 a m w m O m a m ❑ a a E U o O C7 z H a a x vl ❑ z r.� a r a m H G+ a O ❑ z w O( U a h z o ❑ m o m H E-E i-7 14 H m x a H x x U H a (n a U H (A a U W E a U Cu w H a 4 z0 O O i. U H > C O O W C) O O O c) o O U a ti o a o O H m 0 Ol O 0 o o co o � M N o o C. o O h o o t�34 U H a� U m r.4 ❑ Kt .4 rrr < m O m H a m E+ O m .7 < U .-1 r.0 U E+ < U W U H a 41 0028 Z F • O Z M N v N 'n N ID N r N m N M N O M - M N M M M c M U) M m lD M r r M co M N O O N N W C7 U E Q U' £ W C7 £ W (7 £ w U' £ W C7 £ W C7 £ W V' £ w U £ W C7 E W C7 £ W U' £ w C7 £ W C7 E W C7 £ W C7 £ W C7 £ W C7 £ W C7 £ W £ a rn FC a Rl F F E F F E F E F F E E F H E F E E N H E w El Z O a' H .--� N v1 N M O 01 1D O r O c .-1 C H M O• r 1• 0 N in N N m O 10 Jl r O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oz O �) N m £ >+ F� 5 O l0 lD H N V' c ON m 1D N r a' v w co c c H d) M lD M a' O O N O N LO H O N M N a o O O v rn N 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O N cD lD H m H OD r E H Z O 0 Z O O r H O Ln O o N O Ln O 0 N £ £ U H a a F ul z E-4 E- a 2 a E- a F U U U U U U a H a a \ m cwn s w FC a E aL a FC F a w ❑ a FC £ E+ £ a FC H a w o 3 a o FC a E. 4. W UP O H O E O U E > m U > m U > m U > m U>>>>>> > m U) U U) m u) to O H W w 41 O F+ a < O F Z (D H O O F U O H Z (D H O E. W cn H O > a H 13' Qc O ❑ U) (x a O U ❑ H U H. U U H U H U H a U . a U H z U H a U H 0G U H a a O ❑ E U a U O F-1 ❑ a a O ❑ U) m a 0 O z p H a Q ❑ U) ❑ a ❑ O o p � Z "CA U w Z W > W Z Z> Z Z w E+ W Z E W Z E W a E W s E W E U W E-F U W E-E U w EF U w F U w E+ U W Z W > w Z Z> Z O W E-E U) Z W > Z a 1. Z Z W Z > <> Z w Z p E. Z W Z > W U) w W p < m a w a w a w a w a w a w a w a w a w a w a w o U H m w cz a w w a a o U p > z w i > Z W W £ O O H p O H D O H a O H •7 O H a O F-1 O O F-I O O H M �o �D c H H r H o H H N m o r-1 m O D c ik N O O N N O O N H p H O H x H O Z D' > a < > Z < > a < > a < > W < > a rt > a CC > O O N O N 0 Ln W co U > O Z > O Z FC a w Z < m m 1 o F+ a o w a W m N N m O O O m - w N M w M lD lD v' lD tD LO w w �D lD lD M Ln in O O O ti D ) m H lD I1 N in O O O Ln v M O O O N c M O O O D Z F Ln O co r N r N co r N co r N co r N lD r N co r N lD rn O to r N ID r N ID r N �D rn O ID rn O Ln c c rn 0 in •-+ v' c M O r Z O O U ifl N M Ln C' v' Ln a' c Ln C c Ln C' c Ln v V' Ln v V' Ln c' m m 1D N O N Ln c Ln v' O) ID O v' O O O H O V' O O O r-1 O N U F� O O O O O O O O O O o o O O O O (D H O E H E-E H E+ H E H E H E-E H E H E H F H E H E H E H >+ W M Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z O a F( C7 CDW N U E FC E FC E- FC E FC E FC E-E- FC E- FC F-1 FC H E- FC Fi E- FC El FC H E FC x D: W 3 Q < O w W a a H a cz H a D H a a H a a H a a H a a H a cz H a a H a a H a a H a z H H 3 (Y• ❑ Z < F H a [+ W a M < E- Z H n a U H a Q,' H a FC H a FCi H a Q• H a FC H a < H a H a < H a Fti H a < H a H a < H H < a h ❑ a x a H x a a 4 E Z H >I < 04 d FC a o x a, a w m a w m a w m a w QL a w w a w a. a w U. a w m a w m a w D. a w m a W a < m a l x U x £ w U) m o d co E Z a Gu O p Z w > U U-) £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O £ H O E H N < m O H O: O O E O o 1% O LO O O U U < N H H U r O 9 (D - O a £ H - O s £ H - O D. £ H O a £ H O a. £ H O D. £ H O al £ H O CL £ H O a £ H O m £ H O a. £ H O w E H N O 3 a H O .-1 z < h •-+ O a H x C. F H x N d FC a 0029 z Ol O H N M (N L) l0 f m m O r-I N M - 0 �D r� M v c v c c H c c c c V' Ln Ln u) N N LO Lo u7 0 E z N O N O N M U C7 C7 C7 C7 U' C7 V U 0 0 U' 0 U` (7 C7 (7 C7 (7 C7 (7 4 W W W w w w w w w w W w W w w w w w W w £ r.� m E-F E E E+ E E+ E-E E F E E E- E+ EF E E E E E E+ a a m N O O O O o o O O O O O O C' C ul O N lD m O c CD CD 0 O O O (� lD w O O m m N m !, ifl M p] z O M O O O m O N O O) 0\ O O 0\ 01 £ O O O (D O O O) O H l0 N N N M M v N O M c �+ O N lD O o O Ol Ln I` r- O o ul M W o LO I` M c N N N O O O Cl O c N O a O O O M ao o m w w w w m O a V7 Ol M o z o w w w w a)z Ln a 0 In NC) D: z a a O) O W Ln H H (,� 0 U (D m H > N E < < < < Ln E O s s s s x W U C7 C7 C7 U > E+ < < < < K cn H z z z z a H V U U U U 0 H H H £ O W cn cn m m u) N r E+ >+ r a x a o an 0 0 m o a w w a w a E E E E F a < a < O O O O < a < a < E E E E E < z E+ Z F+ Q: E XXXZP a E-E E W W W W W F+ U U V V U V u 0 O w 0 w 0 O 0 cD 0 a a a D. a 0 > > > > > > > W H F a E F E W W W W E+ .7 E 0 E-E E (n m m m m m m UP 0 m m " W P: a W o: m m m m U (z cc tmwwww n m m m m a E+ F P E E+ E F o > ff D: O 0 N < O O u 0 O a< 0 0 a O a 0 o 0 H a o 0 0 O a 0 O a O x O a O a O 0 0 ua u u u U u u z u z 0 z u z a a a w z O z z z m m m m m z d LZ a oG H to W H W H W O O O O w E W 0 w ZMEZZW E+ E E F+ E F H w > .a > > > c= [u [a (a > n > E. > F-1 H H H H > Z z z z z .Z Z 0 0 H [,., [,. Cu Cu H W W W W W W O O O O O O O co x U << a a x x cz a a a a u u u u u u u w w U W N Ln H 2 % O O m m Ln ID m O r O w O 0% m M M O) o Ln > I > m N I m m m m m m m 2 Z £ O M M M M M M M H O H O > ti O O O O O O H z O N o 0 0 0 0 O 0 z O E F F+ E E E F x a z a < m w m x I o O w E Z O �D rl r-I m m O O O O N O O W o M I- r Ll) N O O O O N O O M O M O M M M m O Ln 1D lD ul Ln O O O O m O O u7 O Ln O Ln o Lo O M Ol O) 0) m m Dl Ol m M M Ln M N M N N Ln Z O Cl O O lD )D O t� O C, O O m M O O (D O O Cl O f� � l0 l0 l0 l0 N clj c l- l0 t` ID N l0 N l0 N 10 u7 E z .-1 ri M M M M r-I O 0 O u) m m m m O O O O in u7 Ln in in Ln Ln Ln O Ln O N N - \D 1D lD ID v O O N N N v N u U < O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o > z x 0 a cn r-) a 0 x M z O z z Z Z Z Z Z O H E Q H H H H H H H o O O 2 T x x <x x x x x a a a a a a a a U a a a m a o m m cn w m w w w w w w w a a << a a< z z z z z z z cn a .a a a a H u u u u u z z z z z z Z. I x w a O U U U O O 0 < % m m w m 0 r r r r N m m m m m 0 m WE, < 0 w w w w 0 w E E E E E-E D: (z a z z% a .7 z E < a a a a £ U E El E-F E-F E W w w w w w w m H z £ 0 0 0 0 z w w w w w a a a a a a a < D - 4 4 4 4 w < a a a a a N a D z (L w w w H z a z w w Q� w a a a a < rr�� rr�� rr�� a s s x x s w w w w w w w a < O H cz D: rz v, z rn cn cn 3 3 3 S 3 S 3 .a 0 < a H H H H w w < < < a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co z a m ££££ a m u u u u u a a a a a a a F E. W z 0 0 > in r O Lr) o O 0 o 0 0 0 o O Ln O o O Ln o Ln 0 0 Ln 0 o O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N ri O .-I .-1 .-1 ri O N O O O O O m M m M M M M u E O 0 a a m a 0 z E E E E E 3 3 S S 3 3 3 U. H < H H H H 0 < w W w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < u a ££££ £ z a m a. a s a a a a a a a 0030 Z w m o H 01 ID r-1 H N m N M C 0 w r E O z N O U) O \ N v x U (7 V C7 V C7 O C7 C7 (7 U' C7 O U U O V' W C7 � In In W F W E W F W E. W F W F W F W E W F W H W E W F W F W F W F W E N O m O m OD N m O O O O O O O O c r 01 O O O Co r C' OD r N U7 N M z w E+ z . a' . 7' . . r . O O. . O O. . N . . O O. . . H . a . •-•� £ �. O O N m N m .--i Lo T �o U) N O U7 O U) Ln U) m N O N M a H M w w o 0 o 0 o 0 o o c r u-) rn o o 0 O l0 M m z O O � O Ui U U O O �O z O O Ul N O l0 U) H (n W O al O N 01 H E. H > rl H El ❑ < H < W z ai z a a z a w E a a � � a cwn w a a a � ❑ a E a w ❑ z V V U a E-F a a s £ F £ a E. H > a E. a a s E. a E a E z rt a E. £ £ a H O £ W o H > w > m > w> u 0 F a O o E U 0 E+ a w 0 E. a 0 F+ 0 El o E a \ o E+ O U o E z U H E4 a F E F to a Q U a (.'J C co W < V z IZ U > a E+ U m L7 U 0: > U > U > O H Z U F O z H a0 O Z O 0 H O H O O U O u)O w H O z O m Z mm F Hu) cz F E-E n: F z F w E z z w Z z W ❑ Z w F z U)z W w w Z z w =: Z w z Z W W ZZZH W W Cal W ❑ z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 > cn H > r•C a > a w > co H > to a > O x > U x > r.� a > O x O x O x x x cn w c. a 3 x c7 a < a a a a H U H w ❑ z w w m W N O N O N O N M O) M N O N O OD c r tD O > I > W m U) O) o O) Ul O) M N O N O N O N r N r O O N O N w •--� V' a' N H N O z H O z " £ O M O M O M O M O > > > N a' M M > > O) a' N O M v O) .� ❑ H z O F O F O F O F O z O Z O z 01 o O .--i O z 0 Lo w r r( x z a < m w m a I O o w E 0: 14 dv (n O O v M v M O O O o M U) O O O O O O O O o C. O O O O O O N m m U) O o n O O N O O O O O C. O O w O Z o M O o N O o o Ol O 01 O r N U) M o a• O U) M m m .-1 M E U) kO U) i7) N l0 U) i0 W Ln Ul lO l0 l0 w Z O O H U) N Ln N V' H u7 V' H N N •-i O C' c) O C Q� M 10 ti O a' N O N M U) H O C) O M U) M Ul M U'f V7 o U U < O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 U M U z U z U z U z co O O H H H H () Ln a a w a w a w a w w w a FC z z z z F cn H w I 0 0 0 0 � aH0 z Z a to N EA w a z a w a w x w x w a m 0 ❑ a x m z o x E m < H O d a d a a x w 3 W a W H F E z O z O z O z O z a ry a O ❑ 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O a W E-F O U a O 0 a a > rL m 0 a w a W a W a w u) E [u z W d a d a m a Q m u) ❑ a > > > > Z O O > o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 U7 o U) H O o UN 0 H 0 0 O 0 U) 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 U �+ E M 3 (n 3 (nM 3 m O w H m O O a O x .-1 O a N 0 O a N a N a N a A N a } U < H U O d o a 0 d 0 a o a O a o a x co 0 co a cn x F+ >+ E. w > w > w > ,•J w > 0031 2 W M O O r� O F Z N Lo O \ to 5 .N+ W E E E E £ C7 4 W w w w r.� W F F+ E+ E+ a a rn N cM H to O �--i E-F O Z E. m rn o Lo O M a �a r N O N O) O rr O O OD Z Ln r O M H F a 9 £ w W W U to 0 a > a a s £ E. a 0 o o F F F U F O U H a H> a E. a U C O En 0 z a z 0 z OF H t!� H z W w w W O R x z H !n H a H Z H O 0 r to m O w o m o I , m O O M N Z Z E N O M H G1 H => C V' O 7 H z 0 to M O Ll Lo V) z H .Y. z a � W m a I o o w E+ a N O O O W M O O O (Q to O O O E z m m 01 z m M O O Ln z v M N m ul N O O O c r N v U U N r� O o O O H In H z O F-I F O a O M (n 0 o E+ LO w E-E a z S rC a C7 W H I F a a z s w F H a z cn 0 a ZD 0 0 F a z a s O 0s cc a m a °a z > > > F C. W z O > O O O O I O O H un OU F z z z > > 3 038• 0032 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 2:12PM 12/04/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 50324 DEF 07/12/02 76.00 &01778 MAGDELENA WOODBERRY TOTAL VOIDED 76.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION REFUND EXCURSION 019 0033 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 11:28AM 12/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 51798 DEF 11/20/02 24.00 &01874 LARRY D SHERMAN TOTAL VOIDED 24.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION REFUND DOG LIC OVERPAYMENT 0034 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 11:26AM 12/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 51152 DEF 09/27/02 15.00 &01826 SERENITY POOLS TOTAL VOIDED 15.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION REFUND BUSINESS LIC OVERPAYM 041. 0035 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 51136 DEF 10/03/02 900.00 NAT003 NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL TOTAL VOIDED 900.00 11:25AM 12/09/02 PAGE 1 INVOICE DESCRIPTION REGIS/ANIMAL CONTROL TRAININ 0036 T c&t,/ 4 5 OF Tt�4 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated October 31, 2002 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. Resppptfully submitted: ohn M. Falc4er, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta ME ATTACHMENT 1 MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for October 31, 2002 DATE: November 27, 2002 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending October 31, 2002. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Department. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Ending Change Cash $677,838 (1) ($1,124,125) ($446,287) ($1,124,125) LAIF $17,159,597 519,142 17,678,739 519,142 US Treasuries (2) $57,908,893 50,948 57,959,841 50,948 US Gov't Agencies (2) $14,921,162 3,000,135 (3,000,000) 35,201 14,956,498 35,336 Commercial Paper (2) $0 0 0 Mutual Funds $10,129,991 1 458,908 9,671,083 458,908 Total $10Q797,481 $3,519,277 $4,583 033 $86,149 1 $99,819,874 $977,607 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. M. Falconer �- V ce Director/Treasurer Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. L ,/r! 2.— Date 044 U�3 N ° C C C C ._. Ux C Z C Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W c N _O ` c E A O y o N cc _'D N L O V y w v O U oa ¢ D m� V O LL O LL o m > o m c d c U yO D L(p'p L^ m C m � m E (gyp, co N O N O N N V N C O °O N l0 y c .c N t C O C C C C C Q a m, W p o E N 5 yo��o Q o_o o_o__o .TT ._ �o ap 0 a — O cp C EE TN OL OO g o N w> N `N 8 N O O O N 'p .- �O W T �1°M H�f9 O O= O C O.� W O C > c° C_ C— C O j o o ig C N N U9 eA V1�L5 U .A C O {�9 a b9 V a°o CID_ a O r m o N Z N W (00 fD > O 0 o N o 0o o 0 0 0 O ° O o 0 h In c; ° °M o ^ O O o O o lh o o O Q ep Q O O O O O CIDO u) O O W ci Lo 0 E C C C c C o0T0A0o e 0 N ¢ Z E• z o �1010 C)ION LL Q > N D O o � 0 00 000 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (h o N N o M p N Z O o o o Cl o O O O p _a O m , o O co O OD p j °M O O °M to o G n o O LL a p c moo 0 o r m o 0 Q w w Go E �o c c c c c 0 0 0 0 0 c o o o T FF ■ 0 LL A w O NC v)o N f00 O = 9 C • U/ C m O en w N P c rn m yT o _ c Z w Q c m,w Z m 2 N woopp o QQ LL_ t c LL N O U 1.0 O rn c C E O m o m C U J w e9 �ocy m LL N 8 'M f9 O @N ° op>epp 9 a0i q1 N m m d'� Q N m V Mm�yjdVLLN N O 0f�i g O O O1 dor �C t c O mQ �{°{pp1 c fn� a T-6 �y Q Y O1 C LL C o 0 o c aUim%e$ac N C m� cmi m e 9 O O c n m O c yycp m CL _� O uNl N c t CJO�UJ N c m d v N Z 0 c E U C P .s m O O > c o o m o O o Z= J LL 2 c U a N C N m NvOE�@v`�0 U ¢ O T mcO1c c m eu 9C2 t a Y r N H (n j�U >va o Gov e� y d m m O1 `ULL LLe/7LL LL 8¢ r F o o Lo voouLoi_ N L C 9C9�� N N t U Q n d 8.G2 (LLL m C C C j E E E W W N N N L 0 c c c x ¢ a Q w 045 0U4 F v d E Ra 1 aSrSaaao��rczrczrc°z I7Ss�gg'��aaaaaaaa $gEggFgFFFF SSSS$SSa88S d''� d gNgN VI Ntq UI V1N Uxxw11SiHH" 0� ------------- N ry� 9 N oN o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� Sa L �z3z33z33333'z3'" Q Q a Q Q Q a Q a a Q Q Q O a - N O yy O �aD tCVI r � ------------- gj �g8�8O�O��83��3 C C C C C C C C C C C C E E E E E E m HEEE E E E E E E a aaaaaaa y >r»r>rr»>»r U U U LL Sfyyn,,aNNd�%1aNaNa a,W z sU zr c oYF E Q fn N mNm Nm Ul mf/l� ui y°�K�oJ��K� R'N? a > > N N VU « I z c � o 0 ~ 046 Q �J V � o� IL ?2 0 n 04 m CM — o IL Q C,5 � k U > k _ _ /§ ■ §m CL CL c R R § e E c m Q m 2 0 2 � 2 o L c .§ @ E 3 @ f E % a q Cal)) » 2 § t c « @ ¢= c 2 2 0r E m U c a) ■ § 2 c E £ f f 0 Q a ) 7 E q v D o g m a : 2%£? c c c c o 0 k 2 2§ cn k a k @ ? _ CD f � c © m « 2 CM— > U- § > 4- 4- cU±o_c O n— E 0 > E k � k DM, A g/ g 0 S 2 U� 0 % ? « q2 0 n � � s � � ■ q ? « ® o R 2 � � m o 04 R R CO) o �� q00 m o C �k g ° LL c 222 % o o C R CL 06 CL CL 2 § 0 3 R § o E a @ m ® @ 7 / § a) 3 w Q 2 � U- D \ 2 CD CD° �� % 7 0 f/ c\ 3 £ - @ m V c Cl) a) to & '% 2 2 k k• E U)m �§ƒ ■ k 06 k k CD _ L > § k k 0 Z Q co rl- Cf) CO c cq �© o® co 0 cri ' g (D � § � C 2 U - a)& a-U) / \ } c I t c @ @ C V U w E E c § _ a) a) 2 -0 0 § / / o 3 E E E 3 ® 'D§ C" § n �� 7 \ a k � d m a�§ L) Af/ k ]02 a tt) %z,, u6o 0 K� ) § )2k§ )®�R�aR7$�,#�,� �/ a§k\§2 act Ek\ a~ ! c&�/ @ mC4,k �k\k LL 0 _)\}�\® ' ! 4E _ ! LL ;mom? ` ! 7%f 2 :E> 2k§!am= §zkCL -(L `)I<0 | g9�7 J]\ ,aa]ik-§`� ! ' #f©! eL�k 2,n! !!© ! J�3�K�. ! ƒ2a a- !\�c_ gA§QJI)7a 3_i;_« 048 �\� �U M aMD., m A N �co ��W LO�t�O tW0 C M W ci t 6-- w co N M r w lW+l 1� pNp p tV N M M a In D7 N r y N N N tD O N .d. M n wOOOtO MNaOD� pNp pOj 1d0O V - N O co NOr u) N Wa OLN OD �� w N c6 t0 N {j Opp M N N N pp C14to W M A tN p` O _N to �-N O .d pp py LL co y O M N Lo W o O W, N t0 O N t0 op V O t0 pp t n O pp, Nao p py NNO�� wN� ON0O1_c0OO O p g M O lL O 0) Nw MNN:N co Nr— Ul)t0 co N {+f ty Ip M N �OONen- �cNON W V pop ` r N N r to O W a �OONC O V m( D LO OD pNpp M CNpp 1� OWf^ M M N N M coco M� 0 pD OD d M o, �00N)` O Mtn t) �coN N N cc W N W d u o N N M tb o O r p�tp (O O 0 0 n tD a0 a0� V NIn� O W M co d a0 N c, OO MM t!) wLq O(D O C O M � M M h M lO — M L t0 T t0 LL W rc,4 N W O W W OoOMO M W tno 0Oi^� co r n T N O r tpo dag v r�cov r� 4q W W s p LL •' pj W 0�7MMO N M OWN O N N d N 0 a0 O O tOp N O tp O O O o o t0 OD O a)M 0 nGcL a a0 W O t0 acty O u d.-ao N m O O O O �)ncoo"c 0 0 O rZu)rM) V v g a LL W MM N t0 a0M N M W M A N O Q WO N W O) o pp O M t0 N N N tq W a N O N O O aV O O w N N 7 O S) W� Ipp�pp oco07N O� M N •- a OODDf` V OM)MN d: N W f0 M g W W t") W Ot0 OOo tq N 7 CO ` r O c d L E N O d E L ~ � C N lE ` a N fp u E L d M e D u a to cmc U L m = d -c «.NU..a 3 w ai j; to Idp V U 7 0 C N C d C N d d u- E� .-• U t: d d Q N A d W C f0 ~ O x> c d .. .Q O. d Z X X ccC d N > V t0 C C N F- d e C d> d � W C fl y n C N d O N L j O. N V L O. d X N d ... tp a) 0 C) L C N i m CL w- 0 wcn�OU�F z U w z O C a � d d 0 0 0 c c o z z .L IL H H O a) N N An > X. '� w w (p LL O N U c .d L U O n49 8 LP J1. ur 1 g nn - 3 g saaaassaaa .mm��^�� $&'I%Te Si LSF �F Tn%io N ��Na rn Gia�a�aG�ay yy NNNm!/1mN Q yTix2T�y�papQ 5� ymmN NfdJNNJNJtlIJNJ apQaQO ppapa K9K�K Kya K KKn K�KK�pp�KYa ��yS�P °2 �&biSggg di 0 el e 0 a 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 � N D (V —N� 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 o N N O M co v00n N 1 N 'r r C C N d N O C C f�l L C lU (y0 rn E U Q N p d N c O m EEE� wwwID �� N N N L N 7 7 7 O LL LL C C C d aa`a`v�a'g g eN o C N 0 M (- 0 7 It 0 0 N O �N— — — N o N o (0O0 WM V O LO O f" 00 CO N N 0000 0 .0 LO O N N 0 LL) Q M L000c0 N — N — N L o o 0 0 0 AN LOO W 7 (`O'1 W N N N Lo 2mU Lll aw � LN LO OM 0 w ci — — — NLL N O 00 00 0 r O � M n (0 Mf00cDN0 C N M (6 NOaMaON y(V NM N E i00010 Nm NO C�a O(O LO p M N co Z 0 0 �p 00 o oh0 ON LLOON r e}NMN M E 0 0 fM 0)0 mmm N N M a N N V M M M 7 N ED 0 7 0 0 0 0 7�N0M O Ln Q O('�Mlh --t p 000 0 0 00 LD0 Aa nvin"It vcD * M -�r M O do 0 0 0 0 C aD00 a LO0 7q) O hM0 0 M V ' M d 00o 0 0 (000CD LnO M �N(00O r M L O M a M N oo co w C co Q 00 't m a0 O a LO O M N L o a o 0 0 E0N LO W (0 CO W (- 04 N � 0 to a M a N (O o o o 0 0 n(hoo(fOD,�� N co N O- O O 0(D M a IV o N r (O M Og M O � M CfD O(D LO CD N N �0000 E0 cDr�oov�ln E 0 M I W M y t0 O O Lt) (O N Eoo 0 0 0 E (ll p v d:" N a N V M N G co co (OO co Z goo ooNo p L 0 0 0 M O N a N Cl Cl N M co (D to (0 N Ea,a o 0 I M N M N N n NOO fD co O y0000 0 31 V O 0 M 7 M M N N Q(DOO(G (O 00 o a'o 0= C C N N N N C L � N La La E UQin v � O ii ad O O O m LL ww H N N N L 7 7 7 O i° LL Q`Q`a`�nag 051 z CITY OF LA QUANTA CITY CITY RDA FIXED RDA LONG TERM FINANCING FA LONG TERM GRAND BALANCE SHEET 10I31/02 FIXED LONG TERM RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL CITY ASSETS DEBT ASSETS: 0.00 0.00 13,337,222.77 0.00 0.00 7,771.01 0.00 16,498,070. 18 POOLED CASH 3,153,076.40 0.00 670.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 670,000.00 LQRP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,000,000.00 INVESTMENT T-BILLINOTES 43,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AUTO MALL CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,227.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,227.28 LQRP CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,528.38 O.DO 0.00 338.94 0.00 4.867.32 BOND REDEMPTION CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BOND RESERVE CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,648,844.42 0.00 0.00 527.27 0.00 39,649,371.69 BOND PROJECT CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BOND ESCROW CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 PETTY CASH 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 53,740,822.85 0.00 0.00 8,637.22 0.00 99,903,536.47 CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 46,154,076.40 0.00 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 141,372.16 0.00 0.00 60,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202,272.16 (83,662.02) PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INN (5,028.53) 0.00 0.00 (78.633.49) 49,305.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,305.94 LQRP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVAI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 239,344.75 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 239,344.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,286,040.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,250.742.017 LOANINOTES RECEIVABLE (59.06) 86,040.17 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIE 1,164,702.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,299,096.69 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIE 2,299,096.69 0.00 0.00 (2,299,096.69) CVAG ALLOWANCE (2,299,096.69) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,600.37 DUE FROM OTHER GOVERN 30,600.37 0.00 0.00 98,836.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.836.34 DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,497,550.20 DUE FROM RDA 8,497,550.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,458,773.6 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FI 4,458,773.60 0.00 0.00 1,910,44 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUN[ 1,100.000.00 0.0 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,560.86 NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 3,561.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 ACCRUED REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,359,334.94 FIXED ASSETS 0.00 20,359,334.94 1,018,482.90 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIAT 1,018,482.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,300.00 TRAVEL ADVANCES 2,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PREPAID EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 15,342,580.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,353,515.45 RECEIVABLE TOTAL 16,651,600.25 20,359,334.94 0.00 WORKER COMPENSATION C 148,445.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 148,445.00 0.00 RENT DEPOSITS .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 UTILITY DEPOSITS 70.00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0.00 (951.79) MISC. DEPOSITS (951 79) 0 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 147 568 21 DEPOSITS TOTAL 141,968.21 0.00 0.00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,290,306.05 0.00 0.00 52,290,30 6.05 0.00 0.00 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIAT 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RE- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED I 0.00 0.00 1,694,231.51 0.00 0.00 160,998,172.00 0.00 7.475,000.00 170,167,403.51 TOTAL OBE ROVIDED 0.00 0.00 1,894,231.51 0.00 52,290,306.05 160,998,172.00 0.00 7,475:000.00 222,457,709.56 TOTAL ASSETS 62.953,244.86 20,359,334.94 1694,231.51 69 083,403.11 52,290,306.05 160,998 172.00 8,637.22 7,475,000.00 374,862,329.69 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 389,999.52 0.00 0.00 (345,504.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,4 95.52 97,017.32 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 97,017.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,572,790.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.671,626.56 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS 98,836.34 0.00 0.00 12,483,530.00 0.0000 14,393,980.00 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE T, 1,910,448.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 p 00 ACCRUED EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 95,538.44 95,538.44 INTEREST PAYABLE PAYROLL LIABILITIES 60,187.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,187.24 STRONG MOTION INSTRUME 2,329.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 24,000.00 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (622.26) SUSPENSE (622.26) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QU 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,806,361.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,388,557.18 PAYABLES TOTAL 2,582,195.52 0.00 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,220.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,479. LQRP DEPOSITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 985,479.91 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 960,479.91 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.66 46,5.918. MISC. DEPOSITS 440,918.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,072,372.63 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 1,072,372.63 0.00 0.00 67,220.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,540,991.20 TOTAL DEPOSITS 2,473,771.20 0.00 DEFERRED REVENUE 1.184.702.00 0.00 0.00 11,079,695.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,244,397.08 12.422,197.92 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 1,164,702.0. 0.00 0.00 11,079,695.08 COMPENSATED ABSENCES 0.00 0.00 422,197.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 743,722.59 743,722.59 DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 0.00 0.00 743.722.59 528.311.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 528.311.00 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA OU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,250,000.00 0.00 0.00 8,063,172.00 DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVER! 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,063,172.00 0.00 ,63,72.00 0. DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHO, DUE TO DESERT SANDS SC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 150,6115,000.00 150,685,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,475 ,000.00 D0 158,160,000 DO BONDS PAYABLE BONDS PAYABLE 000 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 1,694,231.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160,998,172.00 '160. 0.00 7,475,000.00 170,167,403.51 TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,694,231.51 24.953,276.74 0.00 160,998,172,00 0.00 7,475,000.00 201,341,348.97 TOTAL LIABILITIES 6,220,668.72 56,732,576.14 20,359,334.94 0.00 44,130,126.37 52,290,306.05 0.00 8,637.22 0.00 173,520,980.72 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE 62 953,244.86 20,359.334.94 1 694.231.51 69,083,403.11 52 290 306.05 160,998,172.00 8,837.00 7,475,000.00 0.00 374,862 329.69 0.00 TOTAL LIABILITY &EQUITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 p,p0 0.00 CASH & INVESTMENT TOTA 99,903,535.47 PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INS 83 662.02 TOTAL 99,819,874.45 �52 I cei4 4 44 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Report for October 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. December 17, 2002 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the October 31, 2002 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta. yoRestfully submi ed: . Falcone , Finance Director rov for submiss' n b Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments 1: Revenue and Expenditures Report, October 31, 2002 053 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES -ALL FUNDS 07/01/2002-10/31/02 ATTACHMENT 1 FUNDS General Library Gas Tax Revenue Cmaq/Istea Federal Assistance Assessment District 2000-1 Slesf (Cops) Revenue Local Law Enforcement Lighting & Landscaping Quimby Crime Violent Task Force Infrastructure Village Parking South Coast Air Quality LQ Public Safety Officer Interest Allocation Capital Improvement Lq Norte Capital Improvement Urban Forestry Equipment Replacement Information Technology -.Arts In Public Places Transportation Parks & Recreation Civic Center Library Development Community Center Street Facility Park Facility Fire Protection Facility Library Development (County) Facility La Quints Financing Authority RDA Project Area No. 1 RDA Project Area No. 2 Total % BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED $16,559,177.00 $4,202,549.18 25.40%..... 623,100.00 2,129.12 0.30 569,900.00 160,193.73 28.10% 595,235.00 0.00 0.00% 164,800.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 1,378.32 0.00% 2,200.00 22.62 1.00% 28,300.00 - 24,345.22 86.00% 829,700.00 0.00 0,00% 33,400.00 1,139.00 3.40% '.. 81,500.00 40,097.86 49,20% 61,700.00 12,216.84 19.80% 0.00 0.00 0.00% 23, 281.00 1,000.21 4.30 % 2,300.00 2,048.43 89.10% 0.00 243,071.41 0.00% 43,451,215.03 3,545,479.23 8.20% 0.00 0.00 0.00% 1,100.00 0.00 0.00% 333,148.00 297,130.14 89.20 % 176,164.00 164,562.68 93.40 % '.. 104,000.00 - 38,822.17 37.30% '.. 572,100.00 367,879.24 64.30% 271,500.00 124,828.93 46.00% '.. 213,300.00 106,154.69 49.80 % 130,400.00 60,243.98 46.20% '.. 53,600.00 26,887.62 50.20% 8,500.00 5,438.18 64.00 % 2,700.00 1,343.72 49.80% 48,700.00 23,587.28 48.40% 204,000.00 0.00 0.00% 688,130.00 485,463.95 70.50 % 25,665,452.00 1,491,601.91 5.80 % 11,843,744.00 220,333.55 1.90% '.. $103,342,346.03 $11,646,949.21 11.30% n%e;,4 CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 07101/2002.10/31/02 FUNDS BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General $17,308,102.00 $3,765,604.44 $12,950.00 $13,629,547.56 21.8% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 669,900.00 189,966.64 0.00 379,933.36 33.3% Cmaghstea 596,235.00 0.00 0.00 595,235.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 164,825.00 (55.00) 0.00 164,880.00 0.0% Proposed Assessment District 142,657.21 150.00 0.00 142,507.21 0.1% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Violent Crime Task Force 40,000.00 4,723.30 0.00 35,276.70 11.8 % Lighting & Landscaping 829,700.00 276,566.68 0.00 553,133.32 33.3% Quimby 97,326.35 4,759.85 0.00 92,566.50 4.9% Infrastructure 3,141,648.00 795,870.67 0.00 2,345,777.33 25.3% Village Parking (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 43,451,214.26 3,545,479.23 0.00 39,905,735.03 8.2% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Urban Forestry 1,100.00 0.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 328,842.00 36,334.26 21,232.56 271,275.18 11.0% Arts In Public Places 436,561.00 109,613.46 0.00 325,947.54 25.2 % Transportation 1,394,804.17 486,907.18 0.00 907,896.99 34.9% Parks & Recreation 5,391,927.00 778,612.33 0.00 4,613,314.67 14.4 % Civic Center 568,518.00 85,761.01 0.00 482,756.99 15.1 % Library Development 5,231,894.04 27,581.37 0.00 5,204,312.67 0.5% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Fire Protection 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,600,000.00 0.0% vary County DIF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Information Technology 611,100.00 71,538.96 0.00 539,561.04 11.7% La Quinta Financing Authority 557,328.58 487,117.49 0.00 70,211.09 87.4% RDA Project Area No.1 38,303,248.77 8,194,748.39 0.00 30,108,500.38 21.4% RDA Project Area No.2 15,790,036.01 1,192,579.04 0.00 14,597,456.97 7.6% Total $136,453,074.54 $20,053,859.30 $34,182.56 $116,365,032.68 055 ��4 GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED TAXES: Property Tax 535,600.00 30,330.15 505,269.85 5.660% No Low Property Tax Distribution 704,700.00 40,521.65 664,178.35 5.750% Document Transfer Tax 387,670.00 114,631.68 273,038.32 29.570% Sales Tax 3,800,000.00 865,858.70 2,934,141.30 22.790% Transient Occupancy Tax 3,510,100.00 438,899.45 3,071,200.55 12.500% Franchise Tax 560 000.00 114 841.34 445,158.66 20.510% TOTAL TAXES 9,498,070.00 1,605,082.97 7,892,987.03 16.900% LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License 175,100.00 61,316.70 113,783.30 35.020% Animal License 12,400.00 4,972.50 7,427.50 40.100% Building Permits 412,500.00 328.725.66 83,774.34 79.690% Plumbing Permits 89,400.00 51,568.80 37,831.20 57.680% Electrical Permits 68,000.00 54,702.45 13,297.55 80.440% Mechanical Permits 37,000.00 31,958.68 5,041.32 86.370% Misc. Permits 46200.00 21653.65 24,546.35 46.870% TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 840,600.00 554,898.44 285,701.56 66.010% FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications 1,200.00 781.04 418.96 65.090% Community Services Fees 187,350.00 55,824.90 131,525.10 29.800% Bldg & Safety Fees 357,950.00 289,562.16 68,387.84 80.890% Community Development Fees 258,400.00 73,632.12 184,767.88 28.500 % Public Works Fees 466 550.00 213 046.51 255,503.49 45.470 % TOTAL FEES 1,273,450.00 632,846.73 640,603.27 49.700% INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu 1,426,200.00 511,807.40 914,392.60 35.890% Motor Vehicle Code Fines 60,000.00 29,742.77 30,257.23 49.570% Parking Violations 45,000.00 22,549.47 22,450.53 50.110% Misc. Fines 10,000.00 4,896.32 5,103.68 48.960% AB939 145,000.00 0.00 145,000.00 0.000% County of Riverside Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% State of California Grant 18,507.00 45,242.27 (26,735.27) 244.460% Fire servicesCredit 1,698,000.00 0.00 1,698,000.00 0.000% CSA152 Assessment 150 000.00 189 703.25 (39,703.25) 126.470 % TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 3,552,707.00 803,941.48 2,748,765.52 22.630% INTEREST 1,359,100.00 604,214.27 754,885.73 44.460% MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue 5,250.00 1,550.81 3,699.19 29.540% Cash Over/(Short) 0.00 14.48 (14.48) 0.000% TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 5,250.00 1,565.29 3,684.71 29.820% TRANSFER IN 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.000% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 16,559,177.00 4,202,549.18 12,356,627.82 25.380% 056 l " V CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED LIBRARY: County of Riverside 621,600.00 0.00 621,600.00 0.000% Interest 1500.00 2129.12 (629.12) 141.940% TOTAL LIBRARY 623,100.00 2,129.12 620,970.88 0.340% GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 162,500.00 47,476.16 115,023.84 29.220% Section 2106 112,000.00 32,627.66 79,372.34 29.130% Section 2107 209,300.00 63,390.54 145,909.46 30.290% Section2107.5 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 100.000% Traffic Congestion Relief 72,200.00 9,818.28 62.381.72 13.600% Interest 7,900.00 881.09 7,018.91 11.150% TOTAL GAS TAX 569,900.00 160,193.73 409.706.27 28.110% CMAQ/ISTEA CMAQ/ISTEAGrant 595,235.00 0.00 595,235.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL CMAQASTEA 595,235.00 0.00 595,235.00 0.000% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant 164,800.00 0.00 164,800.00 0,000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 164,800.00 0.00 164,800.00 0.000% ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest 1,378.32 (1,378.32) 0.000% Assessment Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.000% Prepayments -sewer assessments 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 0.00 1,378.32 (1,378.32) 0.000% SLESF(COPS)REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 2,200.00 22.62 2,177.38 1.030% TOTAL SLESF (COPS) 2,200.00 22.62 2,177.38 1.030% LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding 28,000.00 24,243.00 3,757.00 86.580% Interest 300.00 102.22 197.78 34.070% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LLEBG 28,300.00 24,345.22 3,954.78 86.030% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment 829,700.00 0.00 829,700.00 0.000% Developer 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING 829,700.00 0.00 829,700.00 0.000% QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.000% Interest 8 400.00 1 139.00 7 261.00 13.560% TOTAL QUIMBY 33,400.00 1,139.00 32,261. .410" CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE REVENUE: Member Contributions 50,000.00 40,000.00 10,000.00 80.000% Grant revenue 31,500.00 0.00 31,500.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 97.86 (97.86) 0.000% TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE 61,500.00 40,097.85 41,402.14 49.200 % 057 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % (continued) BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 61,700.00 12,216.84 49,483.16 19.800% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 61,700.00 12,216.84 49,483.16 19.800% VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution 21,881.00 754.07 21,126.93 3.450% Interest 1,400.00 246.14 1,153.86 17.580% TOTAL SCAQ 23,281.00 1,000.21 22,200.79 4.300% LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In 2,000.00 2,000.00 0,00 100.000% Interest 300.00 48.43 251.57 16.140% TOTAL LO PUBLIC SAFETY 2,300.00 2,048.43 251.57 89.060 % INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest 243,071.41 (243,071.41) 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION 0.00 243,071.41 (243.071.41) 0.000% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG 2,963,317.89 381,201.37 2,582.116.52 12.860% CVVVD 877,462.40 0.00 877,462.40 0.000% County of Riverside 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Joint Powers Ins Authority 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% City of Indio 211,409.00 98,836.34 112,572.66 46.750 % SB300 Funding 19,365.74 0.00 19,365.74 0.000% Surface Transportation 3,939,818.00 0.00 3,939,818.00 0.000% SB821-Bicycle Path Grant 55,353.00 0.00 55,353.00 0.000% State of California 650,000.00 0.00 650,000.00 0.000% APP Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Developer Agreement Funding 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.000% Transfers in From Other Funds 34 732 489.00 3,065,441.52 31,667,047.48 8.830 % TOTAL CIP REVENUE 43,451,215.03 3.545,479.23 39,905,735.80 8.160% LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment 0.00 0.00 0.000% Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue 1,100.00 0.00 1.100.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.000% 058 GIV 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % (continued) BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges 289,348.00 289,348.00 0.00 100.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 43,800.00 7,782.14 36,017.86 17.770% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 333,148.00 297,130.14 36,017.86 89.190% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services 162,164.00 162,164.00 0.00 100.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 14,000.00 2,398.68 11,601.32 17.130% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 176,164.00 164,562.68 11,601.32 93.410% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places 87,300.00 36,763.77 50,536.23 42.110% Arts in Public Places Credits Applied 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 16 700.00 2,058.40 14,641.60 12.330% TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 104,000.00 38,822.17 65,177.83 37.330% TRANSPORTATION Developer fees 549,000.00 357,364.48 191,635.52 65.090% Interest 23,100.00 10,514.76 12,585.24 45.520% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 572,100.00 367,679.24 204,220.76 64.300% PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees 251,000.00 124,756.00 126,244.00 49.700% Interest 20,500.00 72.93 20,427.07 0.360% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 271,500.00 124,828.93 146,671.07 45.980% CIVIC CENTER Developer fees 183,000.00 101,025.29 81,974.71 55.210% Interest 30,300.00 5,129.40 25,170.60 16.930% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 213,300.00 106,154.69 107,145.31 49.770 % LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees 112,500.00 57,576.00 64,924.00 51.180% Interest 17,900.00 2,667.98 15.232.02 14,900% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 130,400.00 60,243.98 70,156.02 46.200% COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees 48,500.00 25,649.00 22,851.00 52.880% Interest 5,100.00 1,238.62 3,861.38 24.290% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 53,600.00 26,887.62 26,712.38 50.160% STREET FACILITY Developer fees 7,500.00 5,164.41 2,335.59 68.860% Interest 1000.00 273.77 726.23_ 27.380% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 8,500.00 5,438.18 3,061.82 63.980% n5g CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT (COUNTY) FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL LIBRARY DEV (COUNTY) FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 2,500.00 1,272.00 1,228.00 50.880% 200.00 71.72 128.28 35.860% 2,700.00 1,343.72 1,356.28 49.770% 48,500.00 23,567.19 24,932.81 48.590% 200.00 20.09 179.91 10.050% 48,700.00 23,587.28 25,112.72 48.430% 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.000% 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.000% 204,000.00 0.00 204,000.00 0.000% nip GLA 0710112002.10/31102 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 666,585.00 192,825.28 0.00 473,759.72 28.9% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 715,373.00 178,448.80 0.00 536,924.20 24.9 % ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 905,719.00 192,315.93 0.00 713,403.07 21.2% PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 591,265.00 291,402.23 0.00 299,862.77 49.3% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,878,942.00 854,992.24 0.00 2,023,949.76 29.7% FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 620,157.00 203,925.96 0.00 416,231.04 32.9% CENTRAL SERVICES 590,871.00 160,295.16 0.00 430,575.84 27.1% TOTAL FINANCE 1,211,028.00 364,221.12 0.00 846,806.88 30.1% CITY CLERK 460,305.00 129,289.01 0.00 331,015.99 28.1% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 289,365.00 69,822.03 0.00 219,542.97 24.1% PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATIOI` 842,534.00 145,707.27 14,750.00 682,076.73 17.3% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 95,850.00 26,994.80 0.00 68,855.20 28.2% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,227,749.00 242,524.10 14,750.00 970,474.90 19.8% POLICE 4,461,683.00 405,513.82 0.00 4,056,169.18 9.1% BUILDING & SAFETY: ` BUILDING & SAFETY -ADMIN 212,016.00 64,554.07 0.00 147,461.93 30.4% CODE COMPLIANCE 566,659.00 176,735.57 0.00 389,923.43 31.2% ANIMAL CONTROL 203,582.00 60,519.56 0.00 143,062.44 29.7% BUILDING 584,968.00 235,272.05 0.00 349,695.95 40.2% EMERGENCY SERVICES 35,390.00 13,910.33 0.00 21,479.67 39.3% FIRE 1,752,000.00 566.75 0.00 1,751,433.25 0.0% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,020,063.00 676,521.81 0.00 343,541.19 66.3% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 4,374,678.00 1,228,080.14 0.00 3,146,597.86 28.1% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -ADMIN 546,312.00 98,946.52 0.00 447,365.48 18.1% CURRENT PLANNING 699,551.00 155,000.18 0.00 544,550.82 22.2% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,245,863.00 253,946.70 0.00 991,916.30 20.4% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 244,397.00 91,317.69 0.00 153,079.31 37.4% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 1,008,986.00 321,621.26 0.00 687,364.74 31.9% MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 1,881,960.00 269,972.99 0.00 1,611,987.01 14.3% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPIN( 1,601,786.00 501,666.32 (1,800.00) 1,101,919.68 31.3% CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 337,755.00 71,664.63 0.00 266.090.37 21.2% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 6,074,884.00 1,256,242.89 (1,800.00) 3,820,441.11 24.8% TRANSFERS OUT 348,333.45 83,258.26 0.00 265,075.19 23.9% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,975,363.45) (1,052,463.84) 0.00 (2,922,899.61) 26.5% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 17,308,102.00 3,765,604.44 12,950.00 13,529,547.56 21.8% Rio CITY OF LA QUINTA 0710112002.10/31102 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 569,900.00 189,966.64 0.00 379,933.36 33.3% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL GAS TAX 569,900.00 189,966.64 0.00 379,933.36 33.3% QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT 97,326.36 4,759.85 0.00 92,566.50 4.9% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 164 825.00 (55.00) 0.00 164,880.00 0.0% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CMAOJISTEA TRANSFER OUT 595,235.00 0.00 0.00 595,235.00 0.0% VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE PROJECT EXPENDITURES 40,000.00 4,723.30 0.00 35,276.70 11.8% TOTAL VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE 40,000.00 4,723.30 0.00 35,276.70 11.8 % SLESF(COPS) TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 829,700.00 276,566.68 0.00 553,133.32 33.3% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 829,700.00 276,566.68 0.00 553,133.32 33.3% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 146116 CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 3,141,648.00 795,870.67 0.00 2,345,777.33 25.3% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 3,141,648.00 795,870.67 0.00 2,345,777.33 25.3% ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 142,657.21 150.00 0.00 142,507.21 0.1 % TOTAL AD 2000-1 142,657.21 150.00 0.00 142,507.21 0.1 n6? Cll CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2002 - 10/31/02 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 1,394,804.17 486,907.18 0.00 907,896.99 34.9% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 1,394,804.17 486,907.18 0.00 907,896.99 34.9% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 5,391,927.00 778,612.33 0.00 4,613,314.67 14.4% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 5,391,927.00 778,612.33 0.00 4,613,314.67 14.4% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 203,831.00 67,943.00 0.00 135,888.00 33.3% TRANSFER OUT 364.687.00 17,818.01 0.00 346,868.99 4.9% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 668,518.00 85,761.01 0.00 482,756.99 15.1 % LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 5,231,894.04 27,581.37 0.00 5,204,312.67 0.5% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 5,231,894.04 27,581.37 0.00 5,204,312.67 0.5 % COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 1,500,000.00 0.00 0,00 1,500,000.00 0.0% TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION DIF 1,600.000.00 0.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 0.0% LIBRARY COUNTY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LIBRARY COUNTY DIF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 42,477,281.68 3,493,491.71 0.00 38,983,789.97 8.2% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 973,932.58 51,987.52 0.00 921,945.06 5.3 % TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 43,451,214.26 3,545,479.23 0.00 39,905,735.03 8.2% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 3,700.00 0.00 0.00 3,700.00 0.0% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 1,700.00 900.00 0.00 800.00 52.9% ART PURCHASES 92,000.00 47,475.00 0.00 44,525.00 51.6% TRANSFER OUT 338,161.00 61,238.46 0.00 276,922.54 18.1 % TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 435,561.00 109,613.46 0.00 325,947.54 25.2 % LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES TRANSFER OUT URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 1,100.00 0.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.0% (1892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% 611,100.00 71.538.96 0.00 539,561.04 11.7% 328,842.00 36,334.26 21,232.56 271,275.18 11.0% 0In, I Tit!t 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Approval of Annual Continuing Disclosure for the City of La Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve, receive and file the Annual Continuing Disclosure for the City of La Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On November 10, 1994, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments to existing federal regulations (Rule 15c2-12) for bonds issued after July 3, 1995, requiring issuers of municipal securities (Bond issues) to do the following annually for each bond issue: 1. Prepare official statements meeting the content requirement of Rule 15c2-12. 2. File certain financial information and operating data with national and state repositories each year. 3. Prepare announcements of the significant events including payment defaults, defeasances and draws on a reserve fund as the events occur. 064 Attachment 1 is the 2001 /02 Annual Continuing Disclosure Statement for the City of La Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District - La Quinta, prepared in accordance with the three aforementioned requirements. Additionally, no announcement of significant events was necessary for Fiscal Year 2001 /02. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve, receive and file the Annual Continuing Disclosure for the City of La Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002; or 2. Do not approve, receive and file the Annual Continuing Disclosure for the City of La Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Ily submitte , n M. Falcoder, Finance Director Approved for submission by: r4-yz P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment 1: 2001 /02 Annual Continuing Disclosure Statement for the City of La Quinta 2001-2 Assessment District 0F5 06 ATTACHMENT 1 2001 /2002 ANNUAL INFORMATION STATEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS) LIMITED OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS CITY OF LA QUINTA RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA nsc GA LIST OF PARTICIPANTS CITY OF LA QUINTA www.la-quinta.org John Falconer Finance Director P.O. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 777-7150 DISCLOSURE CONSULTANT & DISSEMINATION AGENT MuniFinancial' Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 Report available for viewin_g www.munLcom UNDERWRITER Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. BOND COUNSEL Rutan & Tucker LLP Costa Mesa, California PAYING AGENT Brad Scarbrough U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. 550 South Hope Street, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 533-8741 * In its role as Disclosure Consultant and Dissemination Agent, MuniFinancial has not passed upon the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the statements contained herein. 067 t1�5 L INTRODUCTION Pursuant to an Official Statement dated June 21, 2000, the City of La Quinta, (the "City") issued $2,285,000 Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) (the "District"), Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds (the 'Bonds"). The Bonds are being issued to finance the construction and acquisition of sewer improvements within the areas commonly known as Village Cove, Westward Ho Drive and Bottlebrush/Sagebrush/Saguaro Streets, which are located within the Assessment District. The City, which comprises approximately 31.18 square miles, is located in the Coachella Valley, twenty miles from Palm Springs and 127 miles from Los Angeles. The District includes three non-contiguous areas in the City. The three areas are the Village Cove section, Westward Ho Drive, and Bottlebrush/Sagebrush/Saguaro Streets. The Village Cove Section is generally located in the area bounded by Calle Tampico on the north, Calle Sinaloa on the south, Washington Street on the east, and Eisenhower Drive on the west. The Westward Ho Drive Area is bounded by Dune Palms Road on the west, Jefferson Street on the east, Westward Ho Drive on the north, and the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Stormwater Channel on the south. The Bonds are limited obligation improvement bonds secured by unpaid assessments on the properties in the District. The Bonds are not a debt of the City, the State of California, or any of its political subdivisions and neither the City, the State of California, nor any of its political subdivisions is liable. The Bonds do not constitute indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limit or restriction. This Annual Information Statement is being provided pursuant to a covenant made by the Agency for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds and includes the information specified in a Continuing Disclosure Certificate. For further information and a more complete description of the City and the Bonds, reference is made to the Official Statement. 2001102 AD 2000-1 City of La Quinta 1 068 u (i ll. BOND INFORMATION A. PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING Bonds As of September 30, 2002 Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) $1,985,000 Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds Unscheduled Redemption of Bonds On September 2, 2002 $10,000 principal amount of the Bonds were called for redemption. The funds for the redemption of the Bonds came from the prepayment of assessment liens on parcels within the District. B. FUND BALANCES Fund As of November Reserve Fund $246,740 Reserve Requirement(') $228,500 Construction/Improvement $435,583 Source: City of La Quinta as compiled by MuniFinancial. (1) The Reserve Requirement was calculated based on the lesser of a) maximum annual debt service on the outstanding bonds b) 125% of the average annual debt service on the bonds, or c) 10% of the amount of the bonds as set forth in the Official Statement. 2001102 AD 2000-1 City of La Quinta 2 nSg' Ill. OPERATING INFORMATION A. PARCEL INFORMATION BY ZONING 2002/2003 Assessed Value Percent of Number Remaining Average Remaining of Assessment Value Assessment Parcels Land Structure �� Total Lien To Lien Lien Developed Commercial 16 $1,371,428 $1,389,476 $2,695,800 $94,155 30.18 4.76% Undeveloped Commercial 21 911,158 911,158 1108,829 8.37 5.50% Subtotal Commercial 37 $2,282,586 $1,470,617 $3,753,203 $202,983 18.49 10.27% Developed Residential 295 $8,555,460 $30,425,464 $38,980,924 $1,201,716 32.44 60.77% Undeveloped Residential 132 2,767,526 17,155 2,784,681 572,721 4.86 28.96% Subtotal Residential 427 $11,322,986 $30,442,619 $41,765,605 $1,774,437 23.53 89.73% TOTAL 464 $13,605,572 $31,913,236 $45,518,808 $1,977,420 23.01 100.00% (1) Undeveloped Properties determined by parcels with assessed structure values greater than $25,000 as set forth on the County's Secured Property Roll. Source: Riverside County 2002/2003 Secured Property Roll as compiled by MuniFinancial. The number of active parcels has decreased from the original amount due to prepayments of the assessments through the Sewer Fee Subsidy program offered by the City to property owners who qualified. 2001102 AD 2000-1 City of La Quuita 4 070 6 i B. PARCEL INFORMATION BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS 2002/2003 Assessed Value Number Of Parcels Land Structure Total Remaining Assessment Lien Average Value To Lien Percent Of Remaining Assessment Lien Developed Residential 295 $8,555,460 $30,425,464 $38,980,924 $1,201,716 32.44 60.77% Developed Commercial 15 1,371,428 1,470,617 2,695,800 94,155 30.18 4.76 Subtotal Developed 311 $9,926,888 $31,896,081 $41,822,969 $1,295,871 32.27 65.53% Undeveloped Residential 132 $2,767,526 $17,155 $2,784,681 $572,721 4.86 28.96 Undeveloped Commercial 21 911,158 911,158 108,829 8.37 5.50 Subtotal Undeveloped 153 $3,678,684 $17,155 $3,695,839 $681,550 5.42 34.47% TOTAL 464 $13,605,572 $31,913,236 $45,518,808 $1,977,420 23.02 100% Source: Riverside County 2002/2003 Secured Property Roll as compiled by MuniFinancial. C. DELINQUENCY SUMMARY Number of Fiscal Number Parcels Annual Assessment Percent Year of Parcels Delinquent t'� Assessment Delinquent (2) Delinquent 2000/01 * 468 11 $243,338 $4,930 2.02% 2001/02 464 18 $245,572 $7,859 3.20% (1) As of October 16, 2002 there are 11 individual parcels delinquent for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 and 18 individual parcels delinquent for Fiscal Year 2001/02. No foreclosure action has been taken, due to the foreclosure covenants, which state $2,000 per parcel or 10% Delinquency rate for the entire District. On July 11, 2001, 16 reminder letters were sent out, and on March 13, 2002, 37 Reminder letters were sent out. (2) Amount delinquent as of October 16, 2002 Source: Riverside County, as compiled by MuniFinancial 2001102 AD 2000-1 City of La Quinta 4 071 ��g D. VALUE TO DEBT The following table sets forth by Value to Debt, the Remaining Bonded Debt and Assessed Value for parcels within the District. 2002/03 2002/03 Assessed Number of Assessed Structure Parcels Land Value Value Total % of 2002/03 Remaining Remaining Assessed Assessment Assessment Value Lien Lien Greater than 30 173 $7,202,126 $22,542,537 $29,744,663 $696,220 35.21% 20 to 29.99 77 1,961,590 6,291,492 8,253,082 328,394 16.61 % 10 to 19.99 68 1,717,262 2,922,805 4,640,067 296,908 15.01 % 5 to 9.99 54 1,907,860 138,095 2,045,955 277,959 14.06% 3 to 4.99 32 504,025 17,028 521,053 132,731 6.71 % 1 to 2.99 31 241,660 1,279 242,939 129,378 6.54% Less than 1 29 71,049 0 71,049 115,830 5.86% Total 464 $13,605,572 $31,913,236 $45,518,808 $1,977,421 100.00% Source: Assessed Values: Riverside County, 2002/2003 Secured Property Roll, as compiled by MuniFinancial. 2001102 AD 2000-1 City of La Quinta 072" 6io IV. SIGNATURE The information set forth herein has been furnished by the City and by sources, which are believed to be accurate and reliable but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. Statements contained in this Annual Information Statement which involve estimates, forecasts, or other matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so described herein, are intended solely as such and are not to be construed as representations of fact. Further, the information and expressions of opinion contained herein are subject to change without notice and the delivery of this Annual Information Statement will not, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the City or any other parties described herein. CITY OF LA QUINTA ionn raiconer Finance Director 12. 1171 2002 2001102 AD 2000-1 City of La Quinta 6 c&tl,l 4 4aQ" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Approval of Annual District Information Sheets for the City of La Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve, receive and file the Annual District Information Sheets for the City of La Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002 (Attachment 1). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: In an effort to monitor the condition of the City-wide Assessment Districts and to report to the investment community the status of the City Assessment Districts, district information sheets have been prepared. Based upon staff review of the Disclosure Information Sheets and based upon discussions with MuniFinancial who prepared the documents, adequate reserves are available to meet debt service payments for the Fiscal Year 2002/03. 074 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve, receive and file the Annual District Information Sheets for the City of La Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002; or 2. Do not approve, receive and file the District Information Sheets for the City of La Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. espectfully submitted, , Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment 1: 2001 /02 District Information Sheets for the City of La Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 075 District Information Sheet ATTACHMENT 1 Assessment District No. 90-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA BOND STATUS as of 12/2/2002 Outstanding Principal: $225,000.00 Annual Debt Service For Amount 2002 $ 138,625.00 2003 $ 85,750.00 DISTRICT STATUS No. of Fiscal Amount Percent Parcels Year Assessment Delinquent Delinquent Delinquent 2001/02 $123,370.94 $2,305.02 1.87% 16 BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION Range of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/03 Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $781.16 Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $25.54 Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $166.32 Original Issue Amount (Par) $1,227,154.97 Final Maturity: September 2, 2005 Date of Issuance July 2, 1990 Bond Call Notice 30 Coupon Payment Dates March 2, September 2 DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio 332.17 Total Assessed Improvements $52,781,666.00 Total Assessed Value $68,552,058.00 Total Assessed Land $15,770,392.00 Type of Improvements Sanitary sewer system ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION as of 08/05/02 Number Category of Parcels Improved Parcels 578 Unimproved Parcels 154 Total 732 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION Percentage of Percentage of Annual Total Parcels Assessment 79.00 % 79.00% 21.00 % 21.00% 100.00 % 100.00% Fund As of Date Balance Funds Administered By Redemption Fund October 4, $68,721.91 Held by Agency 2002 Reserve Fund October 4, $118,869.81 Held By City 2002 Approx. Reserve Requirement: $108,174.00 All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of(' �h' information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold p1ct security. Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 of 2 District Information Sheet Assessment District No. 90-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION as of Date Unavailable Total Delinquencies Delinquency Rate Delinquent No. Tax Year Assessment current current of Parcels 1997/98 $128,761.06 $165.30 0.13% 1 1998/99 $129,566.90 $530.66 0.41 % 3 1999/00 $126,961.22 $724.28 0.57% 4 2000/01 $126,473.26 $1,051.40 0.84% 6 2001 /02 $123,370.94 $2,305.02 1.86% 16 PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT) based on County Property Data as of 08/05/02 Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2002/03 Assessment Value HENRY GRISWOLD 54 0.07% $8,619.96 0.07% $229,153.00 Aggregate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shown on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the secured roll may cause multiple listings for the same owner or for the data to be incomplete. CALL PROVISIONS Optional Redemption: PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER None listed VALUE TO LIEN RATIO: as of 08/05/02 Value to Lien No. of % of Aggregate Remaining % of Ratio Parcels Total Assessed Value Assessment Lien Total 30:1 and Above 648 88.52% $68,222,383.00 $183,431.13 88.88% 10:1 to 29.99:1 84 11.48% $329,675.00 $22,945.29 11.11% 5:1 to 9.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% 3:1 to 4.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% 2:1 to 2.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% 1:1 to 1.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Less than 1:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Undefined 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Total 732 100.00% $68,552,058.00 $206,376.42 100.00% All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold yq security. l � Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 of 2 G 6 5 District Information Sheet Assessment District No. 91-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA BOND STATUS as of 12/2/2002 Outstanding Principal: $545,000.00 Annual Debt Service For Amount 2002 $ 308,940.00 2003 $ 162,060.00 DISTRICT STATUS No. of Fiscal Amount Percent Parcels Year Assessment Delinquent Delinquent Delinquent 2001 /02 $240,629. 88 $5,612.35 2.33% 25 BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION Range of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/03 Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $992.82 Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $24.80 Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $237.39 Original Issue Amount (Par) $2,240,866.05 Final Maturity: Date of Issuance July 17, 1991 Bond Call Notice Coupon Payment Dates March 2, September 2 September 2, 2006 30 DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio 192.64 Total Assessed Improvements $84,337,418.00 Total Assessed Value $110,985,916.00 Total Assessed Land $26,648,498.00 Type of Improvements Sanitary sewer, perimeter wall ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION as of 08/05/02 Number Percentage of Percentage of Annual Category of Parcels Total Parcels Assessment Improved Parcels 819 80.00 % 81.00% Unimproved Parcels 200 20.00 % 19.00% Total 1,019 100.00 % 100.00% FUND BALANCE INFORMATION Fund As of Date Balance Funds Administered By Redemption Fund March 31, $100,051.90 Held By City 2002 Reserve Fund March 31, $218,876.64 Held By City 2002 Approx. Reserve Requirement: $203,704.00 All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such 7 8 security. Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 of 2 6u 6 District Information Sheet Assessment District No. 91-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION as of Date Unavailable Total Delinquencies Delinquency Rate Delinquent No. Tax Year Assessment current current of Parcels 1997/98 $244,219.08 $823.92 0.34% 3 1998/99 $244,985.28 $932.90 0.38% 5 1999/00 $242,973.24 $848.79 0.34% 5 2000/01 $240,877.80 $2,629.10 1.09% 7 2001 /02 $240,629.68 $5,612.35 2.33% 25 PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT) based on County Property Data as of 08/05/02 Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2002103 Assessment Value Aggregate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shown on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the secured roll may cause multiple listings for the same owner or for the data to be incomplete. CALL PROVISIONS Optional Redemption: PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER None listed VALUE TO LIEN RATIO: as of 08/05/02 Value to Lien No. of % of Aggregate Remaining % of Ratio Parcels Total Assessed Value Assessment Lien Total 30:1 and Above 901 88.42% $110,072,285.00 $511,301.88 88.74% 10:1 to 29.99:1 57 5.59% $705,130.00 $34,836.87 6.04% 5:1 to 9.99:1 54 5.30% $192,231.00 $21,882.60 3.79% 3:1 to 4.99:1 3 0.29% $13,712.00 $3,614.32 0.62% 2:1 to 2.99:1 1 0.10% $2,557.00 $1,131.17 0.19% 1:1 to 1.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Less than 1:1 3 0.29% $1.00 $3,377.99 0.58% Undefined 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Total 1,019 100.00% $110,985,916.00 $576,144.83 100.00% All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such security. 0 1? 9 Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 of 2 6U- 7 District Information Sheet Assessment District No. 92-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA BOND STATUS as of 12/2/2002 Outstanding Principal: $795,000.00 Annual Debt Service For Amount 2002 $ 235,865.00 2003 $ 157,815.00 DISTRICT STATUS No. of Fiscal Amount Percent Parcels Year Assessment Delinquent Delinquent Delinquent 2001/02 $188,969.18 $3,566.32 1.89% 19 BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION Range of Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/03 Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $3,419.98 Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $11.02 Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $241.83 Original Issue Amount (Par) $1,880,891.50 Final Maturity: Date of Issuance September 1, 1993 Bond Call Notice Coupon Payment Dates March 2, September 2 DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION September 2, 2008 30 Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio 149.36 Total Assessed Improvements $80,683,810.00 Total Assessed Value $109,797,475.00 Total Assessed Land $29,113,665.00 Type of Improvements Storm drains, streets, water ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION as of 08/05/02 Number Category of Parcels Improved Parcels 655 Unimproved Parcels 119 Total 774 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION Percentage of Percentage of Annual Total Parcels Assessment 85.00 % 84.00% 15.00 % 16.00% 100.00 % 100.00% Fund As of Date Balance Funds Administered By Redemption Fund March 31, $73,114.13 Held By City 2002 Reserve Fund March 31, $186,016.13 Held By City 2002 Approx. Reserve Requirement: $175,110.00 All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold s}{c�{ o security. 1 1 Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 of 2 11t1H District Information Sheet Assessment District No. 92-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION as of Date Unavailable Total Delinquencies Delinquency Rate Delinquent No. Tax Year Assessment current current of Parcels 1998/99 $194,516.50 $197.94 0.10% 1 1999/00 $188,603.62 $644.76 0.34% 3 2000/01 $185,973.20 $1,271.14 0.68% 7 2001 /02 $188,969.18 $3,566.32 1.89% 19 PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT) based on County Property Data as of 08/05/02 Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2002/03 Assessment Value Aggregate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shown on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the secured roll may cause multiple listings for the same owner or for the data to be incomplete. CALL PROVISIONS Optional Redemption: PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER M.L. Stern & Co. VALUE TO LIEN RATIO: as of 08/05/02 Value to Lien No. of % of Aggregate Remaining % of Ratio Parcels Total Assessed Value Assessment Lien Total 30:1 and Above 679 87.73% $108,887,167.00 $658,414.09 89.56% 10:1 to 29.99:1 52 6.72% $735,414.00 $41,738.83 5.67% 5:1 to 9.99:1 14 1.81% $66,880.00 $10,456.70 1.42% 3:1 to 4.99:1 28 3.62% $104,537.00 $23,291.15 3.16% 2:1 to 2.99:1 1 0.13% $3,477.00 $1,238.63 0.16% 1:1 to 1.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Less than 1:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Undefined 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Total 774 100.00% $109,797,475.00 $735,139.40 100.00% All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such_ security. (l 19 Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 of 2 GA District Information Sheet Assessment District No. 97-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA BOND STATUS as of 12/2/2002 Outstanding Principal: $630,000.00 Annual Debt Service For Amount 2002 $ 103,300.00 2003 $ 63,735.00 DISTRICT STATUS No. of Fiscal Amount Percent Parcels Range of Annual Assessments Year Assessment Delinquent Delinquent Delinquent for Fiscal Year 2002/03 2001/02 $65,457.70 $646.84 0.99% 1 Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $719.18 Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $351.72 Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $661.11 BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION Original Issue Amount (Par) $745,000.00 Final Maturity: September 2, 2018 Date of Issuance December 3, 1998 Bond Call Notice 30 Coupon Payment Dates March 2, September 2 DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio 31.20 Total Assessed Improvements $14,852,111.00 Total Assessed Value $19,400,032.00 Total Assessed Land $4,547,921.00 Type of Improvements Roads,water,sewer,landscape ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION as of 08/05/02 Number Category of Parcels Improved Parcels 105 Unimproved Parcels 0 Total 105 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION Percentage of Percentage of Annual Total Parcels Assessment 100.00% 100.00% 0.00 % % 100.00% 100.00% Fund As of Date Balance Funds Administered By Redemption Fund March 31, $77,240.29 Held By City 2002 Reserve Fund March 31, $76,028.30 Held By City 2002 Approx. Reserve Requirement: $66,720.00 All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such security. pp Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 o{2 District Information Sheet Assessment District No. 97-1 City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION as of Date Unavailable Total Delinquencies Delinquency Rate Delinquent No. Tax Year Assessment current current of Parcels 2001 /02 $65,457.70 $646.84 0.99% 1 PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT) based on County Property Data as of 08/05/02 Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2002/03 Assessment Value Aggregate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shown on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the secured roll may cause multiple listings for the same owner or for the data to be incomplete. CALL PROVISIONS Optional Redemption: PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER None listed VALUE TO LIEN RATIO: as of 08/05/02 Value to Lien No. of % of Aggregate Remaining % of Ratio Parcels Total Assessed Value Assessment Lien Total 30:1 and Above 52 49.52% $10,858,739.00 $300,460.18 48.31% 10:1 to 29.99:1 53 50.48% $8,541,293.00 $321,375.57 51.68% 5:1 to 9.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% 3:1 to 4.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% 2:1 to 2.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% 1:1 to 1.99:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Less than 1:1 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Undefined 0 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00% Total 105 100.00% $19,400,032.00 $621,835.75 100.00% All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold yph� security. 4 Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 of 2 T4ht 4:PQ" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Finance Director to Attend the 2003 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference in New York, New York, May 18 — 21, 2003 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Finance Director to attend the four - day 2003 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference in New York, New York 2003. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Costs associated with attending the Conference will be funded through Fiscal Services Training & Meetings, Account No. 101-151-637-000. This conference was budgeted in the 2002/2003 Fiscal Year Budget at $2,300. The breakdown of expenditures anticipated for this conference is as follows: ► Conference Enrollment - Early Registration ► Transportation/Overnight Lodging/Meals Total CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: $ 295.00 2,005.00 $ 2, 300.00 The four -day 2003 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference focuses on financial issues affecting local governments. Seminar information is included in Attachment 1. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve authorization for" overnight travel for the Finance Director to attend the four -day 2003 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Finance Director to attend the four -day 2003 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4/1 n M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment 1 : 2003 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference Agenda 085 Conference Overview Conference sessions will begin Sunday afternoon, May 18, and continue until noon, Wednesday, May 21. The conference ses- sions and exhibits will be in the Hilton Hotel. General Sessions Monday and Tuesday mornings feature noteworthy speakers who will examine general issues of importance to state, local, and provincial governments. Concurrent Sessions Pick from more than 60 concurrent sessions to create your own curriculum. The conference will feature separate tracks devoted to each of the key disciplines of public finance. • Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting This past year has been perhaps the most eventful on record for accountants and auditors. This track will explore a variety of topics that relate directly to these recent events, from significant changes in relevant audit- ing standards to enhancing the effectiveness of audit com- mittees in the public sector. The sessions and discussion groups in this track also will examine a wide range of issues involving how to effectively and efficiently meet the ongo- ing challenges posed by the new governmental financial reporting model. In addition, the track will feature ses- sions devoted to the latest GASB pronouncements and exposure drafts (e.g., deposit and investment risk disclo- sure, other postemployment benefits, affiliated organiza- tions), as well as recent GFOA guidance aimed at financial statement preparers. Ptograr>i Rp wilt. be, p Web site • Budgeting and Financial Planning Budgeting is the principal means of translating citizen preferences into policies, programs, and services. This track will offer practical guidance and explore cutting -edge developments in public budgeting. Leading practitioners will discuss traditional areas of emphasis such as priority setting, revenue forecasting, cutback management and strategic planning, as well as advanced topics in financial modeling, performance management, and technology. Learn from your colleagues how to implement a strategy to bring the financial planning process closer to other major operational and strategic processes in your govern- ment. • Cash Management and Investing The cash management and investing track will explore both time -tested and new practices for improving treasury operations. Economists and portfolio managers will pro- vide forecasts of economic growth, interest rates, and inflation, and will recommend prudent investment strate- gies in today's interest rate environment. Practitioners will present their experience with state-of-the-art .treasury techniques, investment instruments, and portfolio man- agement. Panelists also will discuss how technology can improve the performance of the treasury office and exam- ine the tips and traps of various technologies. • Debt Management The use of municipal debt to finance infrastructure and other capital assets continues to be a challenging area of public finance. Experts from the public and private sectors will speak on a broad range of topics related to debt man- agement. Concurrent sessions will move beyond the basics to explore strategies for reducing borrowing costs, institu- tionalizing discipline in debt issuance, employing technol- ogy, and maintaining regulatory compliance. This track also will examine the effectiveness of capital financing techniques outside the municipal debt market. • Management and Policy The public finance profession continues to attract talented people from a broad range of backgrounds. At least part of the reason for this is that the finance function in gov- ernment continues to evolve and expand. Once viewed as transaction processors and organizational scorekeepers, finance officers are assuming ever -greater responsibility for the strategic direction of their governments. As such, finance officers face greater opportunities and challenges than ever before. This track will examine a broad range of issues related to the expanding role of finance officers and the professionals with whom they work. 0,37 Register Online at www.gfoa.org �%��J • Pensions and Benefits The world of pensions and benefits has changed enormous- ly. This track will examine these changes, including invest- ment strategy in a down market, changing tax laws, and the resurgence of health care inflation. A focus on best practices will be incorporated into the concurrent sessions. Mastering the forces of change helps ensure that pension and benefits administrators and finance directors continue to deliver employee benefits efficiently, effectively, and securely. • Technology and Digital Government Technology continues to be the largest tool of innovation for state and local governments, which have invested billions of dollars on administrative systems over the past several years. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) and financial manage- ment systems are serving as the backbone to digital govern- ment. Governments throughout the country are examining emerging technologies such as constituent relationship man- agement (CRM), e-Procurement, business intelligence soft- ware, and new technology delivery options such as applica- tion service providers (ASPS). This track features the different ways governments are using technology to streamline oper- ations and improve the information they need to manage effectively. Discussion Groups On Tuesday, May 20 from 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., you will have an opportunity to exchange ideas about day-to-day challenges in small groups of your colleagues. Preconference Seminars Make the most of your travel to the GFOA 2003 Annual Conference by registering for one or more of the preconference seminars scheduled Friday, May 16, Saturday, May 17, and Sunday, May 18. Receive a 10 percent discount on both your conference and seminar registration if you attend two precon- ference seminars in addition to the annual conference. • Health Care Benefits: Fundamentals of Plan Design and Cost Management (Half Day. Friday, May 16, 1 p.m. - 5 p.m.) 4 CPE credits State and local governments are continuing to struggle with the challenge of managing the costs of health care benefits. Health care inflation is zooming down a double-digit growth path. This seminar is a primer on health care benefits for both finance officers who are being called upon to find ways to balance budgets and for other budgetary officials who need to be conversant with the complex language of health care benefits. Experts in the field will identify the major players in the industry, examine the cost drivers underlying health care inflation, offer suggestions on how to design a health care benefits plan, and discuss both traditional and cutting -edge cost management techniques. • Managing a Diverse Workforce (Half Day: Friday, May 16, 1 p.m. - 5 p.m.) 4 CPE credits The workforce is becoming more diverse than ever before, creating both challenges and opportunities for public -sector employers. Their response to these changing demographics has a significant impact on employee morale and, by exten- sion, the quality of public services. This half -day seminar will offer strategies on how to successfully manage diverse work environments. The seminar will include a panel discussion featuring experienced diversity experts, as well as an audio/visual presentation. • Reinventing Budgeting. Case Studies in Implementing the NACSLB Recommended Budget Practices (Full Day: Saturday, May 17, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.) 8 CPE credits The National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting's recommended budget practices reflect the state-of-the-art in the field of public budgeting and provide a blueprint for an effective budget process. Since the recommended practices were released in 1998, a number of governments have used them to improve their budget processes. In this full -day sem- inar, government practitioners with experience in imple- menting the NACSLB standards will provide case study exam- ples on how to use the recommended practices as the basis for systematically improving your government's budget process. Featured topics will include long-term planning and forecasting, performance management, financial policy design, and stakeholder participation. • Constituent Relationship Management Systems (Half Day: Saturday, May 17, 1 p.m. - 5 p.m.) 4 CPE credits Constituent relationship management (CRM) has generated a great deal of interest in the public sector over the last few years. This interest has been fueled by a combination of increasing budgetary pressures and constituent expectations for 24-hour access to government services. This session will provide an overview of the applications that fall under the rubric of "CRM," including contact centers, Web portals, rev- enue collection, and public information dissemination. Public administrators who have successfully implemented these sys- tems will also discuss the analytical capabilities of CRM sys- tems, identify the organizational characteristics required to successfully implement CRM, and explore the improvements to existing technologies that must be made for CRM to become more widespread in the public sector. • Mun-Ease (21hdays: Friday, May 16, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.; Saturday, May 18, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.; and Sunday, May 18, 9 a.m. - noon) 20 CPE credits This seminar will offer hands-on training in Mun-Ease, GFOA's municipal bond software —from setting up a data- base to calculating arbitrage rebates. Seminar highlights include understanding the basics of municipal bond calcula- tions; creating a bond issue from an official statement; siz- ing a new -money bond issue; analyzing refunding opportu- nities; when to use SLGS or open market securities; and using the allocations module to perform private -activity usage tests. Register Online at www.gfoa.org l 6 Register Online at www.gfoa.org Save Money By Registering Now Register online at www.gfoa.org or fill out the form in this brochure and mail or fax it to GFOA. Phone registrations cannot be accepted. Check the registration discount dates and save money by registering early. • Registration fees include Monday and Tuesday lun- cheons for delegates and light hors d'oeuvres and enter- tainment at the Sunday Welcome Reception for dele- gates and guests. • Registration fee discounts: To qualify for fee dis- counts, payment must be received by the deadline dates listed. • Additional discounts: You will receive a 10 percent discount on both your conference and preconference seminar registration if one of the following conditions applies: a) five or more people from your jurisdiction are attending the annual conference (registrations must be submitted together) or b) you are attending two pre- conference seminars in addition to the annual confer- ence. • Substitutions (government entities only): A one - for -one substitution of a nonmember for an active mem- ber is allowed. If your organization has a current GFOA member on the staff who is not attending conference, a nonmember may attend in his or her place at the lower member rate. Please provide the name or the member- ship number of the GFOA member. • Guest registration: Guests and children of delegates must be preregistered. Conference sessions and the lun- cheons on Monday and Tuesday are not open to guests and children. There is no registration fee for guests or children. To take advantage of discounts, register today! First discount deadline —register early and save money. i Second and final discount deadline. Full registration fee required. 0 Conference and preconference seminar cancellations, registration changes, and refund requests must be made in writing to GFCA. Cancellations postmarked by this date will be refunded, less a 25 percent service fee. Cancellations postmarked after March 26 but by April 25 will be refunded, less a 50 percent service fee. No refunds will be issued after this date. Getting There Take advantage of GFOA's special fares for conference dele- gates and guests with American Airlines, Continental, Delta, and US Airways and Amtrak. To obtain these discount fares, tickets must be purchased through GFOA's travel agent, ProTravel. E-mail tammiemfdprotravelinc.com or call toll free 800/432-4153 between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. Central time for airfare, train fare, and car rental quotes and reservations. Register Online at www.gfoa.org► G" (, GFOA 97th Annual Conference NEW YORK, NEW YORK M MAY 18 - MAY 21, 2003 1. CONFERENCE/PRECONFERENCE REGISTRATION First Name MI Last Name (T'iease pint or type) Title/Position Organization/Company Mailing Address City State/Province Zip/Postal Code Country Telephone Fax e-mail Address (Required. Conference updates will be e-mailed.) Preferred Name for Badge ❑ Indicate if you are substituting for an active GFOA member. Name of active member 3. PRECONFERENCE SEMINAR REGISTRATION Check the seminar(s) of your choice: ❑ Health Care Benefits: Fundamentals of Plan Design and Cost Management (half day, Friday, May 16) ❑ Managing a Diverse Workforce (half day, Friday, May 16) ❑ Reinventing Budgeting: Case Studies in Implementing the NACSLB Recommended Budget Practices (full day, Saturday, May 17) ❑ Constituent Relationship Management Systems (half day, Saturday, May 17) ❑ Mun-Ease (2 days, Friday - Sunday, May 16-18) Check rate below: Member Nonmember (See discounts in Section 6)** ❑ full -day seminar $295 $ 410 ❑ each 1rz-day seminar $145 $ 250 ❑ Mun-Ease (2'h days) $995 $1,125 5. NEW MEMBER FEES Member type* (check one): ❑ Active ❑ Associate ❑ Other 6. TOTAL FEES — MUST BE COMPLETED (see method of payment) (All fees in U.S, dollars unless noted) Enter fee amounts: Preconference seminar(s): $ Conference registration: $ New member fee:* $ Discount: * * $ Total fees: $ For new membership dues, e-mail Membership@gfoa.org and we will fax you the fee schedule, or visit GFOA's Web site, www.gfoa.orq. All fees are payable in U.S. funds for all regular fees except for Canadian governments which may pay membership fees in Canadian funds. *-^You will receive a 10 percent discount on both your conference and preconference seminar registration if one of the following conditions applies: a) five or more people from your jurisdiction are attending the annual conference (registrations must be submitted together) or b) you are attending two preconference seminars in addition to the annual conference. GFOA, 203 N. LaSalle St., Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60601-1210 E-MAIL: Conference@gfoa.org WEB: www.gfoa.org TELEPHONE: 312/977-9700 FAX: 312/977-4806 (GFOA Tax 04 36-2167796) (GFOA is unable to fax confirmations due to the volume of registrations.) Please affix your mailing label here, and make any changes to your record in the spaces provided at left. 2. GUEST REGISTRATION Print name(s) of guest(s) and/or child(ren) and the age of the children. Please attach additional names if needed. Guests must be preregistered. Guest First Name Last Name Guest First Name Last Name Child First Name Last Name Age 02 or under) Child First Name Last Name Age (12 or under) ❑ If you are faxing this form DO NOT MAIL ORIGINAL. (Taxes are accepted wiah credit card payments only) 4. CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES Early registration fee Advance registration fee Full registration fee (postmarked and paid (postmarked and paid (postmarked and paid by January 24, 2003) by March 24, 2003) after March 24, 2003) ❑ $295 ❑ $330 ❑ $370 Active member ❑ $345 ❑ $385 ❑ $450 Associate member ❑ $395 ❑ $430 ❑ $470 Nonmember public sector ❑ S555 ❑ $585 ❑ $650 Nonmember private sector ❑ $125 ❑ $125 ❑ $125 Student (full-time, unemployed only) 7. METHOD OF PAYMENT — MUST BE COMPLETED Register online at the a -Store on GFOA`s Web site, www.gfoa.org Please check one ❑ Payment by check All registrations prepaid with check should be sent directly to GFOA, Dept. 77-3076, Chicago, IL 60678-3076 ❑ Payment by credit card All registrations prepaid by credit card should be sent directly to GFOA, Dept. 77-3076, Chicago, IL 60678-3076 ❑ Amex ❑ Diner's Club ❑ Discover ❑ MasterCard ❑ VISA Card # Expiration date (mandatory) Print cardholder's full na ❑Bill my P.O.# All billed registrations should be mailed to GFOA, 203 N. LaSalle St., Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60601-1210. All fees must be paid by the time registration is picked up. G F E D C BA 0 • s r • " s s a Policies GFOA has arranged special room rates at seven hotels for GFOA conference attendees only. If you do not register and attend the annual conference, a higher rate will apply. • DEADLINE DATE: April 28, 2003. You can make your room reser- vations online at www.gfoa.org once you have registered for the conference. • ALL reservations must be processed through the GFOA Housing Bureau. Hotels will not accept direct requests from attendees for GFOA's room block and will honor the special conference rate only when the reservation is processed through the GFOA Housing Bureau. (See form on page 7.) *Reservations can be made online, by fax, by phone, or mail. [Hotel reservations will not be accepted through travel agen- cies.] The Housing Bureau will acknowledge reservations within 5 - 7 days of receipt of this form. • All hotels require a one-night room and tax deposit by either check or credit card. Credit card numbers are passed on to the hotel for processing by the GFOA Housing Bureau. Checks must be made payable to PGI HRT, and sent to GFOA Housing Bureau, 2275 A Renaissance Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89119. • Requests for suites will not be honored until your registration form is received by GFOA. E-mail GFOA at Conference@gfoa.org for rates and availability of hospitality suites. Deposits are required for suites. • Inquiries, changes, or cancellations can be made by fax: 800/667- 6584, e-mail: hol@pgi.com, or phone: 888/469-8473. Reservations are assigned on a first -come, first -served basis and according to room availability. Changes and cancellations prior to April 28, 2003, may be phoned in to the housing bureau 6 a.m. - 9 p.m. Monday - Friday and 8 a.m. - 4 p.m. Saturday —Sunday Pacific Time. • Cancellations made after April 28, 2003, will incur a charge of $25. Reservations received close to this date are still subject to this fee. Non-refundable dates for deposits vary by hotel. Please review the cancellation policy on your hotel confirmation. 0 GFOA offers a variety of hotels in the New York area to meet the different preferences of delegates and their guests. Rates do not include hotel tax, which is currently 13.25% plus a $2 New York occupancy tax (subject to change). Check the hotels' Web sites for more information. Hotels & Rates Marion Marquis Singh: $229/Double $249 . Hilton New York Single: $229Double: $249 W [ $ Sirigle/Double: 249'; 0 Sheraton New York '$$229/Double nnd'Hyati Single: $249 Sngle: $219fQoubles $239 Si 0 Sheraton Manhattan Plus 13.25% tax and $2 NY occupancy tax Single/Double: $179 Shuttle to Hilton available from the Grand Novotel Hyatt and the Waldorf. Single/Double: $179 Z 3 W. 64th St. m Central E. 641h St. _ Lincoln Center Park Zoo 'm— n ■ E. 63rd St. W. 63rd St. E. 62nd St. D 3 m CENTRAL PARK < m D < m W. 62nd St. W. 61 st St. @ E. 61st St. W. 60th St. od E. 60th St. CueensbdOreugh .c 9 W. 59th St. Columbus Circle E. 59th St. Central Park South W. 58th St. E. 58th St. W. 57th St. E. 57th St. Carnegie W. 56th St. Hall E. 56th St. W. 55th St. E. 55th St. W. 541h St. I E. 54th St. W. 53rd St. E. 53rd St. W. 52nd St. Ak E. 52nd St. W. 51 at St. E. 51st St. y W. 50th St. Rockefeller E. 50th St. TURTLE BAY ur m -+ W. 49th St. ? m v, D Cent r r ry m s E. 49th St. W. 48th St. y` E. 48th St. 3 D m m < i 'o —y W. 47th St. 1D E. 471h i m y m m D ° m a St. m < a— ■ < m W. 46ih St. E. 46th m m m m D St. United Nations W. 451h St. THEATE E. 45th Headquartarc W. 441h St. DISTRIC h St. m W. 43rd St. Grand Central d LE.42nd St. in T m • Station. W. 42nd St. Times Sq. m m St. n m ■ D gunnel m •� 3 W. 41st St. Bryant , Publie Park Libr ry E. 41st St. v Lincoln Tunnel W. 40th St. E. 40th St. v ■ Port AuthorityW lqthqt■ 6 1 Register Online at www.gfoa.org L GFOA 97th Annual Conference r May 18 - 21, 2003 • New York, NY Official Housing Form i Register online at www.gfoa.org GFOA 2003 Housing Opens: November 20, 2002 Housing Closes: April 28, 2003 IMPORTANT INFORMATION • All reservations must be made through the GFOA Housing Bureau. • Submit one form per room reservation. Make additional copies as needed. • The GFOA Housing Bureau must receive reservations by April 28, 2003. • Changes and cancellations prior to May 5, 2003, must be made through the GFOA Housing Bureau. After May 5, 2003, call your hotel directly. • All cancellations made after April 28, 2003, will incur a charge of $25, 1. Secure Your in n Online at www afoa.orcl After registering for conference, proceed to the hotel reservations page. Please have your credit card, arrival, and departure information ready. Reservation 1 of 4 Ways: By Fax at 800/667-6584 Fax your completed form. DO NOT MAIL ORIGINAL AFTER FAXING Int'I Fax: 702/795-8767 'Lt� By Phone at 888/469-8473 I nt' I : 702/798-6380 ,��ff�� ,!P By Mail Mail your completed form to: GFOA Housing Bureau, 2275 A Renaissance Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89119 2. Guest Information: First Name: Last Name: Please print or type Company: Your housing acknowledgement Address: will be sent via e- mail or fax. Please print information City: State/Province: clearly. Zip Code: Country: Daytime Phone: Fax: e-mail: 3. Hotel To ensure proper accommodations, please indicate your 11, 21, 31d, and 41h choice hotel. See page 6 for hotels. 1 Total Number of Guest(s) in Room: Include yourself in this count 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ Arrival Date: Information: Please write out name of hotel Departure Date: 2"d Guest Names: Number of Beds: 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 d 1„ Wheelchair Accessible Room: ❑ 2�a Smoking: ❑ Non Smoking: ❑ 4` If your first 4 hotel choices are not avail- 31' Additional Requests: able, which is more important: Rate: ❑ Location: ❑ 4`h 4. Deposit Information: • All reservations require a one-night room and tax deposit. (See page 6 for prices and tax.) • If paying by credit cardyour card will be charged upon processing your reservation by the hotel. • If paying by check, send check made out to PGI HRT along with housing form to GFOA Housing Bureau, 2275 A Renaissance Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89119. Checks need to be received within 14 days of making reservation. NOTE: All checks must be received by April 14, 2003. • If you do not send a deposit upon receipt of acknowledgement or provide a credit card number, your reservation will be cancelled. Indicate form of payment: Amex ❑ Diner's Club ❑ Discover ❑ MasterCard ❑ Visa ❑ Credit Card Number: Exp. Date: Name as it appears on Card: Signature: rl All reservations must be processed through the GFOA Housing Bureau. If you are sharing a room, send only one form with the names of all the persons occupying the room. The housing bureau will acknowledge reservations within 5-7 days of receipt of this form. Only reserva- tions received by the GFOA Housing Bureau by April 28, 2003, will be processed. Reservations are assigned on a first -come, first -served basis and according to room availability. Changes and cancellations prior to May 5, 2003, may be phoned in to the GFOA Housing Bureau. After May 5, 2003, you must contact your confirmed hotel directly. 9? V y v Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada 203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601-1210 If you are not RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED Please remove label and affix as indicated on your conference registration form. Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Chicago, Illinois Permit No. 9151 ease e-mail Membership@gfoa.org or fax a copy of any changes to your label to (312) 977-4806. The New York !oral Conference Committee has coordinat- ed many tours and events for you and your guests to take advantage of a sampling of what New York City has to offer. The finale will be any+il�l'�,�G�� Evening on Ellis Island, r(itiEh,Iwi ��,,iaEs, 1 Tuesday, May 20th. Make sure to top your stay in New York walking through = the museum, which after a six year, $162 million repo�.'a�,��?'' �. vation reopened to the ��_ i public in 1990. Twelve mil- lion immigrants passed through Ellis Island between 1892 and 1954 and since that time millions have appreciated the efforts of the National Park Service to preserve this park land for generations to come. Details on tours and Evening on Ellis Island will be posted at www.gfoa.org and in the GFOA Newsletter. Activity brochures will be sent with all conference confirmations. Experience the Big Apple New York is a lively city with a diverse population and vast array of cultural attractions that give the city a feeling of ener- gy and excitement. There are more than 18,000 restaurants serving the best food from every corner of the globe. More than 150 museums offer a glimpse at the wonders of art, history, science, music, and more. Every night, plays and musi- cals on and off Broadway entertain scores of people. Shoppers can shop until they drop at upscale and discount stores throughout the city's five boroughs. New Yorkers are ready to welcome GFOA attendees and show them why they are proud of their home town. nA^ 8 1 GFOA 2003 Annual Conference C11 TW�t 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with David Evans and Associates, Inc. to Prepare the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the Adams Street @ Westward Ho Drive Traffic Signal Improvement, Project 2002-06 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: J STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in the amount of $8.240.00 with David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) to prepare the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the Adams Street @ Westward Ho Drive Traffic Signal Improvement, Project 2002-06. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The project is included within the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 City of La Quinta Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The following represents the approved project budget: Expense Category City Administration Engineering Construction Inspection/Testing/Survey TOTAL: FY 02/03 Budget Amount $ 8,750.00 $ 17, 500.00 $ 135,187.00 $ 13,563.00 $ 175,000.00 As illustrated, adequate funding is available to support staff's recommendation. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 CIP on July 16, 2002. This year's CIP includes installing a new traffic signal at the intersection of Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive. The proposed signal improvements are immediately adjacent to the City's Community Park, which is currently under construction. The proposed work includes preparing a traffic signal warrant analysis, performing a field survey and preparing a base map as part of the project plans, specifications and engineer's estimates (PS&E). Q94, On September 17, 2002, the City Council authorized staff to distribute a Request for Proposal (RFP) to prepare the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for this project. On October 21, 2002, the City received proposals from nine (9) firms interested in preparing the PS&E for the proposed traffic signal. The Consultant Selection Committee met on November 21, 2002 and unanimously recommends DEA be awarded a PSA, in the amount of $8,240.00, to prepare the PS&E for the new traffic signal at the intersection of Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive. Contingent upon the City Council's approval of the design contract with DEA (Attachment 1) on December 17, 2002, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Design (90 days) January - March 2003 City Council Approval of PS&E April 2003 Bid Period April - May 2003 City Council Construction Award June 2003 Construction Period (90 days) June - September 2003 Project Acceptance October 2003 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in the amount of $8,240.00 with David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) to prepare the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the Adams Street @ Westward Ho Drive Traffic Signal Improvement, Project 2002-06; or 2. Do not approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in the amount of $8,240.00 with David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) to prepare the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the Adams Street @ Westward Ho Drive Traffic Signal Improvement, Project 2002-06; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, � L- KIAA&�— imothy R. na s n, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer 095 �: 602 Approved for submission by: tl- Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Professional Services Agreement (PSA) M'I ATTACHMENT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, ("City"), a California municipal corporation, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). The parties hereto agree as follows: • • •� —11011 1.1 mope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services related to Adams Street at Westward Ho Traffic Signal Improvement Project No. 2002-06 as specified in the "Scope of Services' attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work"). Consultant warrants that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the City of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Licenses. Permits. Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.4 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by City, it shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 1.5 Care of Work. Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work performed by Consultant, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of services by Consultant shall not relieve Consultant from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Consultant. 1.6 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Consultant shall not be required to perform any additional services without compensation. Any addition in compensation not exceeding five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increase 097 must be approved by the City Council. 005 Base-con.rev Page 1 of 9 1.7 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in Exhibit "D" (the "Special Requirements"). In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with Exhibit "B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed Eight Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars ($8,240.00) (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.6. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, payment for time and materials based upon Consultant's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.2 Method of Payment. Any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, Consultant shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Consultant specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. City will pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than the last working day of the month. 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in Exhibit "C" (the "Schedule of Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Maieure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his or her judgement such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Sections 7.7 or 7.8 of this 098 Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance. V u ij Base-con.rev Page 2 of 9 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Cliff Simental, L.S., Senior Vice President b. Jimmy H. Lin, P.E., Vice President It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The foregoing principals may not be changed by Consultant and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Steven D. Speer, P.E., Senior Engineer, or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of City. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. 4.5 City Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Consultant only from or through action by City. 099 00 Base-consev Page 3 of 9 5.0 INSURANCE INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. 5.1 Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, personal and public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Consultant's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: Contract Sum Personal Iniury/Property Damage Coverage Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence $50,000 - $300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence Consultant shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Consultant, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Consultant, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Consultant shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws. Consultant shall procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in an amount acceptable to City. All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days written notice to City of proposed cancellation. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. 5.2 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, representatives and agents, from and against those actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including property owned by City) and for errors and omissions committed by Consultant, its officers, employees and agents, which 100 008 Page 4 of 9 Base-con.rev arise out of Consultant's negligent performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own negligence or that of its officers or employees. In the event the City indemnities are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding in any way involving such claims, Contractor shall provide a defense to the City indemnities, or at the City's option, reimburse the City indemnities their costs of defense, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in defense of such claim. In addition, Contractor shall be obligated to promptly pay any final judgement or portion thereof rendered against City indemnities. 5.3 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Consultant's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS. 6.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon termination of this Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant shall cause all subcontractors to assign to City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages suffered thereby. 101 Base-con.rev Page 5 of 9 ; { 19 In the event City or any person, firm or corporation authorized by City reuses said documents and materials without written verification or adaptation by Consultant for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said documents and materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Consultant from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the completion of this Contract and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8. 7.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Consultant sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Consultant in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Consultant requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Consultant. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 102 Base-con.rev Page 6 of 9 �' i 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.8 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. 7.8 Termination For Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City as previously stated in Section 7.3. 7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 8.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which she or he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or general consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry. 1 n 3 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Base-con.rev Page 7 of 9 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. To City: CITY OF LA QUINTA Attention: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 78-495 Calle Tampico P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 To Consultant: DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Attention: Cliff Simental, L.S. Senior Vice President 800 North Haven Avenue, Suite 300 Ontario, California 91764-4915 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understanding, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. 9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 104 v12 Base-con.rev Page 8 of 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney CONSULTANT By: Name: Title: Date: 105 0111 Base-con.rev Page 9 of 9 Exhibit A Scope of Services David Evans and Associates, Inc. scope of services, dated October 29, 2002 is attached and made a part of this Agreement. 106 .. u14 fl 1 At d I Section 3: ScoDe of Work The scope of services identified and E: described in the following paragraphs is prepared to reflect and delineate the project development process from the RFP issued by the City. Part 1 - Project Kick-off 1 A Initial Meeting The DEA team will meet with the City staff to refine project objective, premise, and design constraints. The DEA team will acquire all relevant project information for the City, including the existing topographic and survey information at the intersection, accident history, and the concept plans that were previously approved. I-B Signal WarrantAnalysis The DEA team will conduct a 24-hour tube counts at the intersection with peak hour manual traffic counts between 7AM-9AM, and 4PM-6PM on a typical weekday. From the count results, we will review and analyze the warrant for traffic signal installation at this intersection based on the existing traffic condition. If necessary, the potential trip generation from the new La Quinta Community Park North will be considered in the warrant analysis. A brief report on signal warrant will be prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval. 1-C & D Traffic Signal Improvement Concept Plan This task will commence only it is determined that the signal is warranted at the intersection. The DEA team will obtain the existing digitized topographic map from the City and prepare a new base map to include additional lane improvement on the northeast quadrant of the intersection currently underway. No additional field survey will be conducted for the preparation of base map. The DEA team will prepare a signal concept layout plan, defining the pole and controller locations with power feed, traffic lane configuration, number of lenses and signal phasing plans, and video detection concept. The DEA team will also review and recommend any need for additional geometric improvement to accommodate the safety and ADA compliance at the intersection. The DEA team will meet with City staff to review the concept and obtain concurrence and approval for final design. "' the biggest hurdle in effectively is t e tirrk it will r quire r anU Dole elivety. To to the apWval of conc'it plans Eder of mastarm poles immediately successful contractor will be furnished 107 +t ' Proposal for Traffic Signal Improvements at Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive v15 1 0 7 H with mastarm poles on this project and the construction schedule could be shortened substantially. Part 2 - Agency Approval 2 A Signal Plan Preparation The DEA team will prepare the installation plans, detail sheets, and other supporting document and submit it to the City staff for review. 2-B, C & D Plan Approval Plan approval process will include the receipt of initial review comment from the City staff. The DEA team will revise the plans, Specifications and estimates as per the comment and will resubmit the document to the City. Following the concurrence from the City staff, we understand the document will be forwarded to the City council for final review and comment. The DEA team may be required to attend the meeting and reviewing the PS & E with the City Council. Final revision will be prepared and completed following the receipt of City Council's comment. Revised PS & E will be resubmitted to the City staff for execution. 2-E Format of Documentation The City requires all construction plans to be prepared in AutoCAD 12 and submit both electronic file and hard copy record on "D" size reproducible mylar. All written documents, including technical specifications and bid document, will be prepared on Word Perfect 7.0 for Window format and submit on compact disk. Part 3 - Bidding Phase Service The DEA team will assist the City in reproducing the documents for bidding and will assist in coordinating the advertisement of the bid. The DEA team will also be available for technical consultation during the bidding and contract award process. It is understood that the DEA team will not be responsible for the construction inspection under this contract. 108 - i Fr000sal for Traffic Sional lmproverrienlLs at Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive f ,� Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation here h for Payment shall be in full at the rates listed in the S the SelctiofnB12 lling 2 of tthe attached Agreement wi Total the actual hours submitted in conformance \ compensation for all work under this PiedcontractSection ec iolnit exceedAdditiona ightThousand Two Hundred Agreement. Dollars ($8,240.00) except as specified in S David Evans and Associates, Inc. Cost Proposal Sheet by Work Objective is attached and made a part of this agreement. 109 r-. no CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COST PROPOSAL SHEET The following is a summary of costs to provide the services outlined in the Request for Proposals for Professional Engineering and Design Services for the installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive and will be used as the basis for negotiating a Professional Services Agreement: Work Objectives Proposed Cost lA - Initial Meeting $570.00 1B - Signal Warrant Analysis $685.00 1C&D - Traffic Signal Improvement Concept Plan $1,650.00 2A - Sianal Plan 2 310.00 2B,C&•D - Plan Approval $1,820.00 2E - Format of Documentation $520.00 3 - Bidding Phase Service TOTAL LUMP SUM FIXED FEE: $8 , 2 4 0.0 0 Consultant may include as many, or as few, work objectives if believes are necessary to complete the project. Attached herein is a detailed man-hour and fee breakdown for the tasks and sub -tasks defined in our proposal. Prime ultant to - ?-B�zOoL Date Signed T PWQEMMWICT012002 Prjot6\2002.0e Tref c ftn;O WWMo®AONm1PMw Mow RFF,wpd 1 0 v18 W 0 O U Cci (D lf) Cl X or) W H9 o (n o o_ o 04 o � Ln OD o N �p Lf (O (O M (0 0 d9 N r- OO H ffl V9, Efl Efi EA U.,ui, 1l EA V) Q � ICD CD qq O � O N U d O (O (fl N 69 � aT" N �- N N O 25� N N N N M N • d 69 m a Y CL c O C U O a)H (y0 v y N p N c C L c 0) U (D cn c (0 f0 c a > ° N Q a `� ° a c N U (U Q •- E cn c (� m N c W f- in if � m 06 Q m U N (� N (� m N 0 I Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Consultant shall complete all services within Sixty (60) consecutive calendar days of the date of this Agreement. The anticipated completion date shall be February 14, 2002. David Evans and Associates, Inc. Project Schedule is attached and made a part of this Agreement. 11� �..,. `20 1 '' ' ' Section 4: Project Schedule ' DEA understands the need for accelerated schedules. We have a great deal of confidence in our ability to meet this proposed schedule and pride ourselves in being accessible and responsive to our clients. This will be demonstrated by our t willingness to contractually obligate DEA to an established schedule. With our moderate workload, DEA can adhere to the City's schedule. l u 1 DEA realizes the importance placed upon our firm to provide a quality product to our clients, while maintaining open and clear communication, and by providing our services in a timely manner. "On time" and "on budget" are some of the terms frequently used by clients, but very few consultants are able to live up to these standards. DEA has an excellent reputation for being on time and we have been commended by many of our clients for completing projects ahead of schedule and within budget. The critical path for the plan preparation is the result of signal warrant study. We can immediately commence the concept plan preparation after the concurrence of warrant study by the City staff. We envision the entire project should not take more than six - weeks to complete, provided that the City Council review can be accomplished promptly. Our proposed schedule for this project is summarized as follows: Week 1 - Meeting with City staff, document review, traffic counts & field reconnaissance (I-A) Week 2 - warrant analysis, report submittal and meeting the City staff to present result (1-13) Subsequent activity will be contingent upon the assumption that the traffic signal is warranted at this intersection Week 3 - Prepare base map, complete concept plans and review with the City staff (2-A) Week 4 - Receive and revise City staff comments on PS & E and resubmit to the City Week 5 - City Council Review Week 6 - Receive and revise comments from City Council and submit final PS & E :1). 3 FrOpOSaI iCr I raffiC Sionai I� iiprovementS at Adams Street and iNestward Ho DrIVy' •, lJ Exhibit D Special Requirements None. 11.4 -06 T4ht 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Approval of a Request by the County of Riverside Planning Commission to Utilize the Council Chambers for Public Hearings on February 5, April 2, June 11, August 6, October 8, and December 3, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a request from the County of Riverside Planning Commission to utilize the Council Chambers for Public Hearings on February 5, April 2, June 11, August 6, October 8, and December 3, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. None. None. The County of Riverside Planning Commission has requested that the Council Chambers be made available for public hearings on the following days in the year 2003: February 5, April 2, June 11, August 6, October 8, and December 3. The request meets all the requirements of the facility use as contained in the City's Guidelines. A complete application has been submitted (Attachment 1) for the City Council's consideration. 11) The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve a request from the County of Riverside Planning Commission to utilize the Council Chambers for public hearings on February 5, April 2, June 11, August 6, October 8, and December 3, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.; or 2. Do not approve the request from the County of Riverside Planning Commission to utilize the Council Chambers; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Application c:\agenda\chamberuse its C � 2 ATTACHMENT 1 OF T` "- Organization: Ci VQt'SlD-r eraon(s) Yn Charge: �l—T`t�i 3: L.ta21�10 __ Phone:CQ��g55.321e Address s 4M LVO-,bA3 SIR.-K-7'r OtTo EL001_ I� j1 , C1R.a 250a Facility Requeated: (to1Lxn& L C,4FmPL:9ZS- Type of went: Public XX.SC Private_ Description of Activity: 7LAN IJIVC� Cbn1�1S5td�l1 Date (s) of rise :S/ A 3 2 3/3 Size c)f Group; _1,t.NYM0j0) f id'o Time of Use: Start (a.pn./p,au.) 'RAM FitLigh (a-m-/p.m- )_gf),a Total. Hours of Use x $ . 00 /hour $ N IA Certificate of Additional. Insured ]attached: -or- City Insurance Requested: Fec Paid: /V IR Refundable cleaning Deposit Raid: Session Rocm m $200 Counci.I Chambers (up to 53 people) = $300 Council. Chn ers (54 people plug) = $500 Total Paid: The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by the rules and regulations of the City of La 9uinta relating to the use of public facilition , DateSignature: Title: PLAhj jj1 N(Q a( .'-,j' Ry A►(�! P Deposit Required For: Deposit Returned; Pate; NOTR: 7■. prr.an ■1Qaang the ♦ppxl.•taan .ad tb. ■t.t.■..■t ar >).:or�.tion aLL.t b. %a OrriU,t of ta. t 1� .poiaMora■Q erp+all+taop• Ir ta■ pwtoo�o i■ not +14 axllga; oR tam oeoralrrtloo fop watch rpplichuoe 1P �.A4, A■/xA■ 1 Rua pr...oi ■ra tt.a. .�ROOr1F•Clo■ ;rOM The vr■rp to ups. - 004 T4&t 4 4Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Approval of a Request by the California Regional PUBLIC HEARING: Water Quality Control Board to Utilize the Council Chambers on January 15, March 12, May 7, June 25, September 3, and November 19, 2003, 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Approve a request from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to utilize the Council Chambers on January 15, March 12, May 7, June 25, September 3, and November 19, 2003, 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. None.• None. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board has requested that the Council Chambers be made available for Regional Board meetings on the following days in the year 2003: January 15, March 12, May 7, June 25, September 3, and November 19. The request meets all the requirements of the facility use as contained in the City's Guidelines. A complete application has been submitted (Attachment 1) for the City Council's consideration. 118- 1211011 reTwil 1 I 97TI it 0i 1 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve a request from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to utilize the Council Chambers on January 15, March 12, May 7, June 25, September 3, and November 19, 2003, 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.; or 2. Do not approve the request from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to utilize the Council Chambers; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, T6'h'l, Tom Hartung Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Application c:\agenda\chamberuse III 0032 ATTACHMENT 1 Ct! OF 1 Organixation: Re Tonal Water Quality Control Board Person(s) Zn-Charg*: phone : (760) 776-8938 �ddress: 73-720 Fred Waring Dr. Ste. 100 Palm Desert, CA 92260 "acility Uqusa.teds City Council Chambers ta' c of Event: public x private �lscrip lion of Activity; Regional Board Meetings #eta is) of Use; da Re ort —~� Size of Group: lime of Use: Start a,m. _9.00 a.m.Piniah (a.m./p.a.)2:00 p.m. total Hours or Use —�' 4 $32-00 boUr s S N /A 4ertificate of Additional %Sured xttachad, -or- qity �•arance Requested: _ Ikfundable Cleaning D E� s $200 eposit paid, �essioa cilChasbers (ap to 53 people) it CbaMbers (54 peaple plus) 3btal Paids Robert Perdue Poo Paid: N/A $3 00 $Soo N /A e "adersigued harepy agrees to abide y D� the City of La Quinta relati by the rules aad regulations D4tte lic facilities, Signatures us Title: Assistant Executive Officer Dr:pos i t Requirei pore _ N /A D*posit Aetu=edl Date: N/A N/A ss• >ese.� etyese! the e.ue be '!ricer of apllleacioe eNi�seeL/ a!*saieseiM. s! N! Verses is see .� th. •nee"-e •t uleaysle� Alt prshe �tieeen sKwei,.■,.s !� ye as •slicer of e6• e+e.o+.sciea lei .biep e 1 Lift y eio,. VV asstie& is &&y. y!e►. 004 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Grant Deed Conveying Fee Simple Right -of -Way to the City For Madison Street Multi -purpose Trail - PGA West Homeowners Association AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: /0 Accept the Grant Deeds that convey fee simple right-of-way to the City for the Madison Street Multi -purpose trail and direct the City Clerk to have the deeds recorded at the Riverside County Recorder's Office. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Cost to maintain the multi -purpose trail is unknown at this time. The City will request a change order cost proposal from Lundeen Pacific Corporation, the contractor providing city wide landscape maintenance service, to add the cost of maintenance to their contract. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. The City has planned a comprehensive system of multi -purpose trails extending throughout the City, however, many of the City's trails are not yet marked or fully improved. The proposed multi -purpose trails will be developed in conjunction with new development projects. One of the conditions of approval for Tract Nos. 28838, 29136 and 29147, all developments of PGA West Master Association, was to construct an equestrian trail with a six foot wide meandering sidewalk along the frontage of Madison Street. T:\PWDEPT1 COUNCIL\021217c'PGA-HOA.wpd I IV n j KSL Development Corporation, in the process of developing the above mentioned subdivisions, requested and received from the City Council an amendment to the General Plan Policy 3-6.3.2, which then allowed arterial streets to have sidewalks only on one side if a multi -purpose trail was constructed on the other side of the street. This request was approved on September 19, 2000 by the City Council, which in turn affected the above subdivisions. All off -site improvements along Madison Street have been constructed but have not been accepted by the City. PGA West Master Association desires to dedicate the 10-foot wide multi -purpose trail to the City in fee simple ownership, to avoid the liability issues associated with public use facility of this type. The Association inadvertently transmitted the deed documents directly to Riverside County Recorder's Office delaying processing by the City. Pursuant to the conditions of approval for Tract Nos. 28838, 29136 and 29147, it was understood that the City would assume maintenance responsibility for the multi -purpose trail, and that the dedication of that trail would be by a separate instrument. The plats and legal descriptions for the multi -purpose trail are shown on Attachments 1, 2 and 3. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept the dedication of the multi -purpose trail from PGA West Homeowners Association by way of three grant deeds, as shown on Attachments 1, 2 and 3; or 2. Do not accept the dedication of the multi -purpose trail from PGA West Homeowners Association, shown on Attachments 1, 2 and 3; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Timothy R:� a son, P.E. Public Works D' ctor/City Engineer 122 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\021217c' PGA-HOA.wpd Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Grant deed and exhibits for Tract Map 28838 2. Grant deed and exhibits for Tract Map 29136 3. Grant deed and exhibits for Tract Map 29147-1 123 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\021217c'PGA-HOA.wpd RECORDING REQUESTED AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: F— Name: Peters & Freedman, L.L.P. Address: 191 Calla Magdalena, Suite 220 City & State: Encintias, California L_ zip: 92024 A ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 7 ATTACHMEN M $ U PAGE SIZE DA PCOR NOCOR SMF MISC, A R I L I COPY LONG REFUND NCHG EXAM GRANT DEED the following is true and Documentary transfer tax is $ 0-: 00 0 Computed on full value of property conveyed, or C] Computed on full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale. Q Unincorporated area: ® City of La Quinta FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, PGA WEST MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. hereby GRANT(S) to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA the following described real property in the County of Riverside As set forth in Exhibit "A" (Tract No. 28838) a(1:57 , and , State of California:. PGA WEST Master Association, Inc. Dated ' zu LC,4 State of California County of Riverside Lo • - Au F s v . P- On /co before e, /4� personally peared personally known to me (or proved ?meon the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the erson(s), or the �tity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. 11 JOYCE E. MEN MEN WI NESS hand and officials al. 0 NOTARY PUBLC PUBLIC-ORNIA� RIVERSIDE COUNTY 0 COMM. EXP. DEC , 2005-1 SIGNATUR TRIVOrder No. Escrow, Loan, or Attorney File No. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of La Qu ME ta, P.O. Box 1504 , La Q}�a, CA 92253 CITY.STATE,ZIP NONJC-010 Martin Dean's Essential Forms TM GRANT DEED EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 28838 STRIP A: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE BEING THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOT D AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 28838-2, AS FILED IN BOOK 293 AT PAGES 50 THROUGH 55, INCLUSIVE; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOTS M AND K AS SHOWN BY AMENDED TRACT NO. 28838-1, AS FILED IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 51 THROUGH 57, INCLUSIVE, BOTH OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT D, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 00'46'52" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT D, AND ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4_744'13% AN ARC LENGTH OF 37,42 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 00'10'26" EAST, 29.91 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 205.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1914'44 AN ARC LENGTH OF 36.66 FEET; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 195.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 79'55'42" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10' 14'44' , AN ARC LENGTH OF 34.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0' 10'26" EAST, 51.82 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6'02'32", AN ARC LENGTH OF 118.64 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8347'02" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'04% AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8V07'54" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'047, AN ARC LENGTH OF 237.28 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8347'02" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'04", AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 84'07'54' WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1705'04% AN ARC LENGTH OF 237.28 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 83'47'02" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'04", AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 84707'54" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'04', AN ARC LENGTH OF 237.28 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF' A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 83747'02" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'047, AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8V07154" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'04" , AN ARC LENGTH OF 237.28 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8347'02" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'05'04, AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 84'07'54" WEST,; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1948'28", AN ARC LENGTH OF 212.21 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 389.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 85'03'38" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4'45'56", AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'10'26" EAST, 141.81 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT K, AS SHOWN BY SAID AMENDED TRACT NO. 28838-1 THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT D PER SAID TRACT NO. 28838-2, AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT K PER SAID AMENDED TRACT NO. 28838-1. SAID STRIP A CONTAINS 24,244 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. 125 AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. 006 -01 7-8-02 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 28838 STRIP B: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE BEING THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOTS H AND F, AS SHOWN BY AMENDED TRACT NO. 28838-1, AS FILED IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 51 THROUGH 57, INCLUSIVE OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LETTERED LOT F; THENCE NORTH 89'42'54" EAST, 5.35 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 151.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 86'18'03" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8'37'30", AN ARC LENGTH OF 22.73 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 249.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 77'40'33" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'01'46", AN ARC LENGTH OF 87.05 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 245.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 82'17'41" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'31'53', AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0'10'26' WEST, 78.26 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORHTWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT H. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT F, AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT H. SAID STRIP B CONTAINS 2,203 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED. HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. STRIP C: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE BEING THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOT A, AS SHOWN BY AMENDED TRACT NO. 28838-1, AS FILED IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 51 THROUGH 57, INCLUSIVE OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: lcl COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LETTERED LOT A; THENCE 'SOUTH 33'51'50" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT A, 18.45 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00' 10'26" EAST, 145.30 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT A. - THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID LETTERED LOT A. SAID STRIP C CONTAINS 1,453 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: \o�PL LAJ. ND LS. 6588 CHRIS J. BE H, P.L.S 6588 DATE * Ep. 12-31-03 EXP. 12/31 /03 F OF CALF/ 12G �?07 1 7-8-02 EXHIBIT 99B99 SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS LHTY OF LA QUINTA P.M. STRIP A 1IULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL - 2� (10' WIDE) TRACT NO. 28838 - ,A+RPO, T STRIP A I rACT 1\10, 2883E�3-2 JMB, 20 3/ 5J - II { ill 3 i { I II I SCALE 1" =400' 4{ II { I i I I STRIP "A AST IP C J. ND s 9 G� ST R I P L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 q�F OF CALF PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: (LI 0R- 110Y CHRIS J. BERG , P.L.S. EY8 DAf E EXP, 12/31/03 I 1NJI3, 2 5/ 1- 1 P.O.B. - STRIP B M O K S E 79-799 Old Avenue 52 . La Quima, G192253 O O K I C H Voice: 760-771-4013 S C H U L T i PAX: 760-771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS I:\51300\MAPPING\SWEA5E-01 0 988 -EXHIBIT "B" -CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 28838 SCALE 1 " =100' ® LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE 1 N 00'10'26' W 29.91' 2 N 00' 10'26" W 51.82' ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTFC 1 1014'44" 205.00' 36.66' 2 1(714'44" 195.00' 34.87' 3 06'02'32" 1125.00' 118.64' 4 1705'04" 775.00' 163.46' 5 1705'04" 1125.00' 237.28' 6 4744'13" 45.00' 37.42' LAND �O s J. G � U L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 F PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: �L 0 Avj % ( in-- CHRIS J. BE , P.L.S a 588 DATE EXP. 12/31 /03 O K 5 1 79-799 Old Avwmu 52 .a.' La Quinla, CA 92253 O K I C H Voice:760-771-4013 CHULTZ FAX: 760-771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS A SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS C/L AIRPORT BLVD. P.O.B. „..., 9 347'02" E PRC s SEE SHEET 3 m L\l 7-8-02 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (10' WIDE) TRACT NO. 28838 SCALE 1" =100' ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 1 1705'04" 775.00' 163.46' 2 12'05'04" 1125.00' 237.28'� B E LL-ERTPE— LAN p as J sG L.S. 65as * Exp. 12-31-03 P t �9TF OF CAL1F�� PREPARED UNDER, THE SUPERVISION OF: 64 IIIJ';-- CHRIS J. BER , P.L.S. 588 DATE EXP. 12/31 /03 A STRIPII A M 0 R S E 79-799 Old Avenue 52 . Lo Quirda, CA 92253 D O K I C H Voice; 760.771-4013 S C H U L T Z FAX: 760-7714073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS SEE SHEET 2 347'027 E (RAD- PRC 5 4 '07'54" IN (RAD,) PRC 2 7'07 E PRO 77 76 RAD.) 75 PRC 74 73 I 147'OT E PRC I LL I il"t I I I SEE SHEET 4 CC) n t�l %.O L� 1 11 129 909 -03 7-6-02 EXHIBIT "B" SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI —PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) F L L C F C SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 5 i 13 oto -8-02 EXHIBIT "B77 SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 28838 L/n1 I L/ J 1 / U.J M O R S R D O K I C H SCHULT2 PLANNERS ENGINEERS 79.799 Old Avenue 52 La Quinfa, CA 92253 Voicat 760.771-4013 FAX 760.771-4073 SURVEYORS SEE SHEET 4 7-8-02 RECORDING REQUESTED P" AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: ATTACHMENT 2 Name: Peters & Freedman, L.L.P. Address: 191 Calle Magdalena, Suite 220 City & State: Encintias, California L_ Zip: 92024 X ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 7 -jI under pe M S U PAGE I SIZE I DA I PCOR NOCORFMF MISC. _+ LNCHG A R L COPY LONG REFUND E7(AM GRANT DEED Documentary transfer tax is $ 0 , 0 0 0 Computed on full value of property conveyed, or 0 Computed on full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale. 0 Unincorporated area: a City of La Quinta FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, PGA WEST MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. hereby GRANT(S) to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA the following described real property in the County of Riverside As set forth in Exhibit "A" (Tract No. 29136) 2— Dated ' State of California Count of Riverside Ict: M � I and , State of California: PGA WEST Master Association, Inc. Y V,) . 3va-Nl`� Y'tUP-p4q 10 v- P On IUD OU 2— beforem, personally appeared lam' ?ed personally known to me (or pro me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. .- JOYCE E. MERMEN WITNE S my h and official seal. ... R NOTARYPU BLIC-CA IIFFORNIAA RIVERSIDE COUNTY n COMM. EXP. DEC. T X20 k" SIGNATURE Title Order No. Escrow, Loan, or Attorney File No. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of La Quinta, P.O. I:iox 15o4, La Quinta, CA 92253 132 NAME ADDRESS CITY,STATE,ZIP NONJC-010 GRANT DEED Martin Dean's Essential Forms TM i t� 4EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL TRACT NO. 29136 STRIP A: (10) WIDE) A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE, BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT 36, AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 29136 AS FILED IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 4 THROUGH 16, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 36; THENCE NORTH 89'29'14' EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 36, A DISTANCE OF 6.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH OZ25-247 EAST, 383.24 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 36. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTTENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 36. SAID STRIP A CONTAINS 3,831 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. STRIP B: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE, BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT J, AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 29136 AS FILED IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 4 THROUGH 16, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LETTERED LOT J, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 38'39'33" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'01'23", AN ARC LENGTH OF 7.34 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 02'24'36" EAST, 108.83 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT J. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY -AND rl SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID LOT J. SAID STRIP B CONTAINS 1,092 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT B ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: Nw, I � ( OL- CHRIS J, BERM, P.L.S. 88 DATE EXP. 12/31/03 �r\P� LAND J SG a U I 0 L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 ��qrF �F CAL\F��\P 133 1310\ MAPPING\ SWEASE -01 7 / 8-02 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (10t WIDE) TRACT N0. 29136 STRIP C: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE, BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT 35, AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 29136 AS FILED IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 4 THROUGH 16, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 35, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 43'30'20" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 35, AND ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'58'34", AN ARC LENGTH OF 7.32 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 02'25'24" EAST, 175.33 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 849.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 87'34'36" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'44'21", AN ARC LENGTH OF 85.04 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1151.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 81'50'15" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'28'42', AN ARC LENGTH OF 230.59 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 849.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 86'41'03" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'44'21", AN ARC LENGTH OF 85.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'25'24" EAST, 400.00 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 849.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8734'36" EAST, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'44'21", AN ARC LENGTH OF 85.04 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1151.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 81'50'15" EAST, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'28'42', AN ARC LENGTH OF 230.59 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 849.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 86'41'03" WEST, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'44'21", AN ARC LENGTH OF 85.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'25'24" EAST, 400.00 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 849.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 87'34'36" WEST, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'44'21", AN ARC LENGTH OF 85.04 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1151.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 81'50'15" EAST, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 V19'.15", AN ARC LENGTH OF 227.42 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 36. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 35. SAID STRIP CONTAINS 20,889 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. ��\Q�P� J. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: o� & 0- (j i L.S. 6588 Exp. 12-31-03 CHRIEXP. J. 12/Bl /03 P.L.S 588 DATE `rJgTF �F CA 134 �?1 I:\ 51310\ MAPPING\ SWEASE-01 7 -8-02 r, EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF LA QUINTA F - - MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (10' WIDE) TRACT NO. 29136 R/W i SCALE 1" =400' STRIP A STRIP B STRIP C J. ANC SGG B � L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 P CAL\E��\ PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: CHRIS J. BE 1, P,L.S, 688 DATE EXP. 12/31/03 SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS PP..0, - STRIP A Ill TH TRACT NO. 29136 M.B. 285/4-16 \ I•f.I•1 M O R S E 79-799 Old Avenue 52 Ds Lo Quintu, CA 92253 D O K I C H Voice:76 7 3 S C N U L T X FAX: 7� PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 022 I:\51310\MAPPING\SWEASE-01 7-8-02 E:?XHIBIT 99 B 99 CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI —PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 29136 STRIP A SCALE 1" =100' ® LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE 1 N 89*29' 147 E 6.00, P.O.C.- 2 N 0725'24" W 383.24' STRIP B 3 N 0724'36" W 108.83' 4 N 0725'24" W 175.33' - ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 1 1701'23" 35.00' 7.34' 1 2 11*58'34" 35.00' 7.32' \��PL LAND GAG �5 J. eF a U = R. L.S. 6588 Exp. 12-31-03 * P . 0 C ��91F N.W. COR. OF CAI\F��\P LOT 35 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: k�fj 0.1 CHRIS J. BERM, P.L.S. 588 D TE EXP. 12/31 /03 M 0 R S E 79.799 Old Avenue 52 . Lo Ouinfa, CA 92253 D O K I C H Voice: 760-771-4013 S C 9 U L T 2 FAX: 760.771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS P.O.0 N.W. COR. LOT 36 w W F-- 0 SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS P.O.B. STRIP A III T 26 (WELL SITE) S TE) P.O.B. STRIP B L �1 t� o � i N S ON HEATH L 11-1 Ce SEE SHEET 3 T.P.O.Be STRIP C LOT 27 116 014,23 1e-02 7-8-02 13 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 29136 T I SCALE 1"=100' ® LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE 1 N 0725'24" W 400.00' ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 1 05'44'21' 849.00' 85.04' 2 11*28'42" 1151.00' 230.59' 3 05'44'21" 849.00' 85.04' STRIP C \p�P� LAND s `J G Cr U Z 0 L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 OF CAS\F PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: am � � vuk -)I CHRIS J. BER , P.L.S. 6588 DATE EXP. 12/31 /03 STRIP C M O K S E 79-799 Old Avenue 52 D La Quinla, CA 92253 D O K I C H Voice:760-771-4013 S C N U L i 2 FAX: 760-771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS SEE SHEET 2 SEE SHEET 4 SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS _ PR LOT 3 _ N 86'41'03" DDr+ V36" ESRAD)_ N 87!34'36" PRC 137 ��h, sweaseaL-02 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 29136 SCALE 1" =100' ® LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE 1 N 0725'24" W 400.00' ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 1 05'44'21" 849.00' 85.04' 2 11'28'42" 1151.00' 230.59' 3 05 44'21" 849.00' 85.04' / � LAND \ \0 s � J. G L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 ��qTF OF CAt\F��\P PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: Uw' � 9 Vj, - 1U 0 CHRIS J. BER00, P.L.S. &88 DATE EXP. 12/31 /03 M O R S E 79.799 Old Avenue 52 . La Qanda, CA 92253 D O K I C" Voice., 760-7714013 S C H U L T Z FAX: 760-771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 4 SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 5 SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS 8T34'36"_E RAD.) 81,50_C_ E �RAO� - pR N 86'41'03" Pit �- N 8734'36" EJW.)- _ N 8T34'p3RC E�RAD� 138 310 ma in sweose-04 7-8-02 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 29136 i SCALE 1 " =100' ® LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE 1 N ' 4635' 16" W 15.13' ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 1 05'44'21" 849.00' 85.04' 2 11' 19' 15" 1151.00' 227.42' OAP` LAND J. T = o c.� L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 �TgTF �F CA0F�� SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS SEE SHEET 4 PRC W 0 N '15 E RAD� — 81•50 LLJ — PRC QD 'L—k) � Li N ,L STRIP C Z 1-. L\1 O 0 �� Cd 0 3 I Q N 8550'3Q" W J i � U 1 AIRPORT BLVD. C/L PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: pp" � h � Vj i d " CHRIS J. BERG4 P.L.S. #8 DATE EXP. 12/31 /03 O R S E 79-799 Old AveAvenuem52 Lo QuiMo, CA 92253 K I C H Voice. 760-771-4013 MR H u L T Z FAX: 760-771.4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 1191 031 -05 7-8-02 RECORDING REQUESTED RV AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: �I F Name: Peters & Freedman, L.L.P. I Address: 191 calle Magdalena, Suite 220 City & State: Encintias, California L- zip: 92024 K A ^.mac ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. GRANT DEED The undersigned Grantor(s) declare(s) under penalty of perjury that the following is true Documentary transfer tax is $ 0.0 0 (Q Computed on full value of property conveyed, or ❑ Computed on full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale. ❑ Unincorporated area: J�j City of La Quinta FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, PGA WEST MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. hereby GRANT(S) to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA the following described real property in the County of Riverside As set forth in Exhibit "A" (Tract No. 29147-1) ATTACHMENT 3 M PAGE SIZE DA PCOR NOCOR SMF misc. +SU A R L COPY LONG REFUND NCHG EXAM correct: , and , State of California: PGA WEST Master Association, Inc. Dated U State of California 7 �P —6 Z_' County of Riverside Stq tit E_s u >u P Ns1 . v - P On befo4m, personally apearred personally known to me (or pro idto me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the (s) acted, executed the instrument. E. MERMEN r 4 I' and and ffici se V%JOYCE NOTARY PUBLCOWA IC-CALIFORNIA �RIVSRSIDE COUNTY Q COMM, EXP, 010. 7, 2WS'" SIGNATURE L Order No. Escrow, Loan, or Attorney File No. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: NAME City of La Quinta ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1504 La �i��{�tE�p CA 9.22535O NONJO-010 GRANT DEED Martin Dean's Essential Forms TM t, 31.0 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS 6ITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (10' WIDE) LCRACT NO. 29147-1 STRIP A: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE, BEING THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOT M, AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 29147-1, AS FILED IN BOOK 287 PAGES 4 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LETTERED LOT M; THENCE NORTH 89'42'54" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT M, 5.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 151.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 86' 18'06' WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'53'3T, AN ARC LENGTH OF 10.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH WiO'42' EAST, 147.35 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'02'32', AN ARC LENGTH OF 118.64 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 725.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 83'46'41r EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1ZO5'04", AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 84 O8' 10" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 Z05'04', AN ARC LENGTH OF 237.28 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 725.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 83'46'46' EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1705'04 AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 84 08' 10' WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF OT57'04% AN ARC LENGTH OF 77.58 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT M. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID LETTERED LOT M., SAID STRIP A CONTAINS 9,179 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. STRIP 6: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE, BEING THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOT A, AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 29147-1, AS FILED IN BOOK 287 PAGES .4 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LETTERED LOT A, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 40'54'14' WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'33'07', AN ARC LENGTH OF 7.06 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0(r20'54! WEST, 61.42 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT A. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID LETTERED LOT A. SAID STRIP B CONTAINS 611 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'Er ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. 14 033 11 7-1-02 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL (10' WIDE) r"RACT NO. 29147-1 STRIP C: A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE, BEING THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOT S, AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 29147-1, AS FILED IN BOOK 287 PAGES 4 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE CENTER LINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LETTERED LOT S, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 41'15'38' WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10'29'02', AN ARC LENGTH OF 6.40 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 8847'03' WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'00'17", AN ARC LENGTH OF 98.27 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 315.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 83'46'46' EAST, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 09'07", AN ARC LENGTH OF 77.80 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8704'07' WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08'06'35, AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'10'42' EAST, 76.62 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0737'45, AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.56 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8732'57' WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0737'45, AN ARC LENGTH 51.62 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 89'49'18' WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0502'32', AN ARC LENGTH OF 118.64 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8Y46'46' EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1705-047, AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.46 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 8408'1O' WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1705'04', AN ARC LENGTH OF 237.28 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 83'46'46' EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 36'23", AN ARC LENGTH OF 197.57 FEET, TO A POINT HEREINAFTER CALLED POINT A, SAID POINT A BEING THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF SAID 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID STRIP TO BE SHORTENED OR LENGTHENED TO TERMINATE AT THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT S, AND AT A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO AND 5.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY FROM POINT 2 AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. SAID STRIP C CONTAINS 11,011 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. 14� 034 1 5-8-02 EXHIBIT "A„ SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI —PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 29147--1 rl STRIP D: THAT PORTION OF LETTERED LOT S, AS SHOWN BY TRACT NO. 29147-1. AS FILED IN BOOK 287 PAGES 4 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OR RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT A, PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, THENCE SOUTH 81'36'51' EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH- ERLY LINE OF STRIP C, PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, 5.00 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID STRIP D; SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 346.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 81'36'51' WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF OS'33'51", AN ARC LENGTH OF 51.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0910'42" EAST, 246.19 FEET, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT S; THENCE NORTH 4502'33" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 11.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0910'42" WEST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LETTERED LOT S, 275.84 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 356.00 FEET, THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE, AND ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0729'17', AN ARC LENGTH OF 15.46 FEET, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID STRIP C, PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE SOUTH 81'36'51" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 5.00 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID STRIP D CONTAINS 2,412 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "8" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: �L � �a �( I 4 CHRIS J. BERG P.L.S. &88 DATE: EXP. 12/31 /0 C\QN LpNO SG eF pG C _� o n- U S 70 L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 ��qTF OF CAOF��\P 141 n'3r SWEASE-01 5-8-02 EXHllil'1' ti CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI —PURPOSE TRAIL (10' WIDE) TRACT NO. 29147-1� wfis R/W7q STRIP A7 0 SCALE 1 =400' STRIP STRIP C R/W- PL LANDJ. SG CL_i 70 L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 CALF STRIP 1 D PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: _tL � t � )w I L. CHRIS J. BER , P.L.S. 588 DATE EXP. 12/31/03 SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS r>>\J IND. TRACT 1\1 , 2@030 -1 INJI2. 2 J/J1-Jf 'O.B. _ I TRACT JN . 29,147--1 1�/1,B, 2JE 7/4- J 1 TRACT 1\10, 01%1-� 1 >\ 8, 287 /4-11 M O R S E 79-799 Old Awnu� 52 H D S La Quinla, CA 92253 D O K I C H Voice: 760.771-4013 S C H U L T Z FAX: 760.771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYOR 7-1-02 EXHIBIT "B CITY OF LA QUINTA MULTI —PURPOSE TRAIL (109 WIDE) TRACT NO. 29147-1 STRIP A SCALE 1"=100' R/W- ® LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE 1 N 89'42'54" E 5.35' 2 N 0710'42" W 147.35' ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 1 03'53'35" 151.00' 10.26' 2 06'02'32" 1125.00' 118.64' 3 12'05'04" 725.00' 163.46' 4 1705'04" 1125.00' 237.28' 5 03'57'04" 1125.00' 77.58' R/W PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: i 0 CHRIS J. BERGO P.L.S. 88 D E EXP. 12/31 /03 M O K S E 79.799 Old Avenue 52 D Lo Quinto, CA 92253 D O K I C H Voice:760-771-4013 S C H U L T Z FAX: 760-771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS P.O.C. T. p.O. B. SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS 0 0 ( / 0 . ZEIa � I 74 7 I0'or W N180'41'18" E 46' E PRC 'ion w PRC rN .o 1 P/ 63 2 .1O 7-8-02 EXHIBIT "B 'ITY OF IA QUINTA VULTI—PURPOSE TRAIL TRACT N0. 29147-1 STRIP STRIP I STRIP B P.O.C. SCALE 1 " =100' Q) LINE DATA BEARING DISTANCE 1 N 00'20'54' E 61,42' 2 N 00' 10'42' W 76.62' ® CURVE DATA DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 1 11*33'07" 35.00' 7.06' 2 10'29'02' 35.00' 6.40' 3 05'00'17" 1125.00' 98.27' 4 14'09'07" 315.00' 77.80' 5 08'06'35' 285.00' 40.34 6 02'37'45' 775.00' 35.56' 7 02'37'45' 1125.00' 51.62' 8 06'02'32' 1125.00' 118.64' 9 1705'04" 775,00' 163.46' PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: . N* � " oy CHRIS J. BER P.L.S. 88 DATE EXP. 12/31/03 M O R S E 79*799 Old Avenue 52 D Lo Quinla, CA 92253 DOKICH Voice:760.771-4013 SCHULTZ FAX: 760-771.4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS R/W— F- W (A z C Q L. R/W SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS SEE SHELF' 2 T.P.O.. RIP VALHALLA GATE �N 894T0Y E (R) 60.00' N� 4E 160 R 8704 07 31 E (RAD•) '11o" w T I I VviI I I 1 SEE SHEET 4 34 Mil 30 41 VXI-IIBIT 5IB99 CITY OF LA QUINTA SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL SEE SHEET 3 TRACT NO. 29147-1 R/W N 4' 8 STRIP C LT w 01 C F_ SCALE 1" =100' Z 1y g 4 ® LINE DATA O BEARING DISTANCE 1 S 81'36'51" E 5.00' Q 2 N 45'02'33" W 11.34' ® CURVE DATA � DELTA RADIUS LENGTH \ 1 12705'04" 1125.00' 237.28' U 2 14 36'23" 775.00' 197.57' 4 3 08'33'51" 346.00' 51.72' N 84*06'08" W 4 02'29' 17" 356.00' 15.46' RAD.) 1 3 STRIP D a 3 R/W Lo N zo 3 O lcq F PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: b z z F CHRIS J. BER , P.L.S. 688 DA E EXP. 12/31 /03 A M o R S E 79-799 Old A""vo 52 D La Quinla, CA 92253 D O R I C H Voice: 760-7714013 S C H U L T Z FAX: 760.771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 33 ' 110" w 34 35 4' E PRC . 36 POINT A 8 '3651" 1 I 37 N 89'49' 18" E 38 39 CHANTICLEER DRIVE C/L 58TH STREET 1 , A 51300\maooina\ swease-09 7-8-02 �o0o c o`` o 4 cF�r OF94 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION. / COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Appointment to Fill PUBLIC HEARING: City Council Vacancy RECOMMENDATION: Consider an appointment to fill the vacant City Council term which expires November 30, 2004. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the City Council meeting of December 3, 2002, the Council directed staff to accept resumes and letters of interest from individuals interested in appointment to the unexpired City Council seat. At the direction of the City Council display advertisements were placed in The Desert Sun on Friday, December 6, and Sunday, December 8, 2002, announcing the vacancy, the deadline and the procedure to apply for appointment. The following individuals have submitted letters of interest and/or resumes and have been invited to attend the meeting: • Colleen Gaynes • Lee M. Osborne • Robert Alcala • John S. Burchfield • Donald O. Spears • Myron E. Mintz • William S. Bishop • John C. Hendrick • Elizabeth P. Benton • Donald J. Troy • Loren McGuire • Joan Rebich • Stuart C. Roth • Fred Davis • Joseph H. McCoy • Robert T. Tyler • T. Swift Lockard • Carol Emmons • Jacques Abels • John C. Doyle • Paul R Puma, Sr. • Elsa Louden • Robert G. Cox • Frank R. Ceja 148 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES; The alternatives available to the City Council include: Consider an appointment to fill the vacant City Council term which expires November 30, 2004; or 2. Do not consider an appointment to fill the vacant City Council term which expires November 30, 2004 and direct staff to place a special election for June 3, 2003, pursuant to Government Code Section 36512; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, W--ow-0 WE -ra Jun4 Attachments: Letters of Interest 1. Colleen Gaynes 2. Lee M. Osborne 3 Robert Alcala 4. Donald Spears 5. John S. Burchfield 6. Myron E. Mintz 7. Donald J. Troy 8. Loren McGuire 9. Joan Rebich 10. Stuart C. Roth 11. Fred Davis 12. William S. Bishop 13. Joseph H. McCoy 14. John C. Hendrick Approved for submission by: I-rhomas P. Genovese, City Manager 15. T. Swift Lockard 16. Carol Emmons 17. Robert T. Tyler 18. Jacques Abels 19. John C. Doyle 20. Paul R. Puma, Sr. 21. Elsa Louden 22. Robert G. Cox 23. Frank R. Ceja 24. Elizabeth P. Benton 149 December 5, 2002 Colleen Gaynes, Ed.D. 51040 Avenida Carranza La Quinta, CA 92253 Mayor Adolph and the La Quinta City Council Members 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA. Dear Mayor Adolph and Council Members: ATTACHMENT 1, RECEIVED 2,112 DEC -6 AIHI I1: 39 CITY OF LA 4UI ETA CITY CLU K'S OFFICE Please accept this letter as my official request to be considered as an appointed Council Member for the City of La Quinta. I am over 18 years of age, a permanent resident of the City of La Quinta, and a registered voter in the City of La Quinta. I selected La Quinta to purchase a home in 1997 due to its interest in the welfare of all citizens and the dynamic community planning by the city. La Quinta has proven to be a wonderful place to live and I plan to make it my home for many years to come. It has always been my desire to give back to my community and serving as a Council Member would give me that opportunity. I have a very strong background in education and that experience and knowledge could be an asset to the city of La Quinta in working with school districts, higher education, and youth programs. In 2001, I retired from the position of Superintendent for the Coachella Valley Unified School District after spending 32 years in K-12 education. Since that time, I have enriched my life through taking courses at the College of The Desert and teaching classes at California State University, San Bernardino. Currently, I am a full time lecturer in Educational Administration for California State University, San Bernardino and advise all of the Educational Administration students attending CSUSB from the Coachella Valley. Enclosed you will find a copy of my resume and a brief biographical summary. If you have any additional questions please contact me at 760 771-9532. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Coll0"ynes. . Biographical Sketch Colleen K. Gaynes, Ed.D. Colleen Gaynes is a College of Education Lecturer for California State University San Bernardino (CSUSB) in the department of Educational Leadership and Curriculum. She came to CSUSB in 2002 after serving more than thirty-two years in California K-12 public schools. Her professional experiences included five years as the superintendent of Coachella Valley Unified School District (13,000 ADA), four years as a human resources assistant superintendent, and four years as a high school principal. Dr. Gaynes also serves as a consultant in the areas of Human Resources, Leadership, and Governance. In 2000 she was recognized for her contributions to the Hispanic community in Coachella Valley by receiving the "Sol Azteca" award. Dr. Gaynes received her B.A. in Fine Arts from Kansas State University. She received her M.S. in Educational Administration and Ed.D. in Institutional Management from Pepperdine University. 6/02 Colleen K. Gaynes, Ed.D. Lecturer, College of Education California State University, San Bernardino 5500 University Parkway San Bernardino, CA 92407-2397 (909) 880-5458 e-mail: cgaXnes56(c�cs.com (home) e-mail: cgaynesncsusb.edu (work) EDUCATION 1988-1991 Ed.D., Pepperdine University 1974-1975 M.S., Pepperdine University 1961-1965 B.A., Kansas State University EMPLOYMENT 2002-pres. Lecturer. California State University San Bernardino, College of Education, Educational Leadership and Curriculum; Responsibilities include advising Tier I and Tier H students in educational administration, educational administration fieldwork supervision, and instruction in the areas of human resources, leadership, and community relations. 2001-pres. Conauli , Participated in the Certificated Personnel Hiring Process Project and assessed human resources practices in California public school districts with a high percentage of emergency credentialed teachers. 19%-2001 Superintendent. Coachella Valley Unified School District, Thermal. CA. K-12 unified school district of 13,000 ADA; Improved Student Achievement each year with 86% improvement in Language Arts and 130% improvement in Mathematics since 1998, built two new schools and obtained 98 million for three schools, passed a twenty million General obligation Bond in 1997 which was 60 % of the bonding capacity of the district, implemented intensive staff and parent training programs, developed a leadership team that successfully met the challenges of a 70% English Language Lerner student population in one of the poorest area of the nation, and was recognized for significant contribution to the Hispanic community in 2000. 1994-1996 Assiog Superintendent Human Resources. Madera Unified School District, Madera, CA. K-12 unified school district of 16,000 ADA; Successfully used Interest Based bargaining to develop positive labor relations, established a position control system, and reorganized the personnel office to more effectively handle personnel concerns and paper flow. 1992-1994 Assistant Superintendent Personnel. Ceres Unified School District, Ceres, CA. K-12 unified school district of 8,700 ADA; Re-established personnel office after district office fire, reorganized the personnel office to more effectively handle personnel concerns and paper flow, and developed positive labor relations. 152 Gaynes, C., Page 2 of 4 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (Continued) 1988-1992 Principal, San Dimas High School, Bonita Unified School District, San Dimas, CA. K-12 unified school district of 9,500 ADA and high school of 1,200 ADA; Established an incentive program with an academic emphasis, rebuilt the center quad, established training programs for staff, actively participated in the community, and created articulation programs with the feeder middle school. 1986-1988 Assistant Principal, Don Lugo High School, Chino Unified School District, Chino, CA. K- 12 unified school district of 23,000 ADA, and high school of 2,700 ADA; Re-established discipline and order and supervised the student attendance system. 1983-1986 Educational Services Field Representative. Jostens Inc. Served as the Southern California Representative for a new Educational Media and Mini - Course product line and sold graduation supplies and class rings at school sites. 1979-1983 Assistant Principal. and Guidance Administrator, Whitney High School, in ABC Unified School District, CA. K-12 unified school district of 23,000 ADA and 7-12 school of 800 ADA. Developed a college -prep, magnet, 7-12 school, and taught students successful competition and interview techniques. 1976-1979 Counselor, Gahr High School and Cerritos High School in ABC Unified School District, CA. K-12 school district of 23,000 ADA and 9-12 high schools of over 2,000 ADA. Provided all counseling services for assigned caseload. 1972-1976 Director of Student Activities and Teacher, Cerritos High School in the ABC Unified School District. K-12 unified school district of 23,000 ADA and 9-12 high school of over 2,000 ADA. Created a student activities program for new high school, served as Annual Advisor for two publications, and taught Ceramics, Art I and II, Photography, Leadership, and Annual. 1970-1972 Teacher, Bellflower High School in Bellflower Unified School District. K-12 unified school district of 12,000 ADA and 9-12 high school of 2,000 ADA. Taught Art I and II, Ceramics, Photography, and Annual. 1965-1970 Teacher, Grades 7-9, Bellflower Unified, Lynwood Unified, Denver Unified, and Los Angles Unified. Taught Art, Crafts, General Science, and P.E. CREDENTIALS Ryan Administrative -Life Pupil Personnel Services - Life Standard Secondary Teaching - Life General Secondary Teaching - Life ip7 Gaynes, C., Page 3 of 4 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS Gaynes, C.K. (November/December, 1998). Technology Blooms in the Desert. Education West, volume 1, Number 2. Gaynes, C.K. (May/June, 1990). The Who and What of Instructional Leadership. Thrust for Educational Leadership, Volume 19, No. S. Gaynes, C. K. (November/December, 1990). Only the Best. Thrust for Educational Leadership, Volume 20, No. 3. Dissertation topic: "The Impact of the California School Leadership Academy on Preparing Principals as Instructional Leaders". Pepperdine University, 1991. SELECTED PRESENTATIONS "We Build the Future," California Retired Teachers "The Future of the Coachella Valley," The Foundation for California "State Changes Since 1996," Delta Kappa Gamma "Coachella Valley Unified School District," La Quinta Mayors Lunch "Due Process Procedures," Madera Management Team "Reclassification," Ceres Board of Education "Achieving Re -Classification Through a Creative Problem Solving Approach," CFIER/USB-IIR/PERB Annual Conference "Intermediate/High School Curriculum Articulation," Principals Conference for Academic Excellence in Effective Schools "So You Want to Be A Principal," Southern Counties Women in Educational Management SELECTED PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND ACTIVITIES ABC Counseling and Guidance Association President 1978-1979 Association of California School Administrators Bonita Management Team President 1991-1992 California Faculty Association Madera Management Team Legislative Action Vice President Phi Delta Kappa SELECTED COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS AND ACTIVITIES "Sol Azteca Award" for contributions to the Hispanic community - 2000 Education Advisory Committee for California State University, San Bernardino Education Advisory Committee for California State University, Stanislaus Coachella Valley Rotary President Coachella Valley Education Foundation Secretary John F. Kennedy Hospital Board of Directors Chair of the John F. Kennedy Community Relations Committee United Way of the Desert Board of Directors La Quinta Art Foundation Board of Directors Grand Marshall Coachella and Salton Sea Christmas Parades 154 C Gaynes, C., Page 4 of 4 REFERENCES Dr. David Long, County Superintendent Riverside County Office of Education 3939 13th St, Riverside, CA 92502-0868 Work 909 788-6670 home 909 244-2789 Dr. George Bloch, Superintendent Chino Valley Unified School District 5130 Riverside Drive, Chino, CA 91710 work 909 628-1201 home 714 499-9809 Mr. Mike Keebler, Consultant 80685 Hibscus Lane Indio, CA 92201 work 760 862-5065 home 760 347-8031 Ann Reinhagen, Principal 82-314 Gable Dr. Indio, CA 92201 work 760 775-6888 home 760 342-2080 Armando Paiz Past Coachella Valley Unified Board Member P.O. Box 466 Thermal, CA 92274 home 760 396-2769 Sylvia Gullingsrud Past President Coachella Valley Teachers Association 79-175 Latigo Circle La Quinta, CA 92253 work 760 398-0178 home 760 345-3462 Molly Aguilar Past President California School Employees Association, Coachella 85-517 Avenue 66 Thermal, CA 92274 work 760 399-5137 home 760 397-5100 My professional placement file is available from: Pepperdine University, Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Pepperdine University Plaza, 400 Corporate Pointe, Culver City, CA 90230-9833 12/02 155 LEE M. OSBORNE, CPA 43-671 MESSINA CRT. LA QUINTA, CA. 92253 December 5, 2002 To The Honorable Mayor Don Adolph Council Members Stanley Sniff Terry Henderson Ron Perkins ATTACHMENT 2. RECEIVED 2002 MCC -5 Fri 3: 56 CITY OF L A, QUINT A CITY CLEF K 5 OFFICE My name is Lee M. Osborne, my family and I reside at 43-671 Messina Court, in La Quinta, California. I wish to be considered for appointment to the open position on the La Quinta City Council. My wife, Nancy Osborne, and our four kids, have lived in the city of La Quinta since 1992. We purchased our first home located at 54-325 Avenida Ramirez in July of 1992. Since that time we have been active here in this city and have raised our family here. In December of 1999 we moved to our current residence in the Bella Vista development located in north La Quinta. I have been a board member of the city's Investment Advisory Board since 1995. During that time I have served two years as Chairman. I have been intricately involved in the City's financial affairs for over seven years. As a CPA and involved in the financial arena for over 15 years, I am well qualified to deal with the financial responsibilities of our city. I have helped draft the cities investment policy since 1995, which has been adopted by the city council each year. While on the Investment Advisory Board, I have discussed the city's financial position with the city's outside auditors each year. Our board has always worked to secure the investments of the city and the future of those investments. With my position on the I.A.B., I receive the minutes of all of the city council meetings. I regularly read those minutes to keep track of our city and issues facing the city council. In other community affairs, I am a member and past president of the La Quinta Rotary Club, on the board of the La Quinta High School Education Foundation and the Coachella Valley Education Foundation. Our office also provides a college scholarship to kids in the Coachella Valley School District. I am also a member and current vice chair of the Coachella Valley Enterprise Zone Advisory Board. 156 ( IQ I am president and sole owner of the accounting firm of Peterson, Slater and Osborne. When I took over the company in 1998 it had been located in Indio for over 30 years. In 1999 I realized that La Quinta was a much better location for the anticipated growth of our firm. In August of 2001 our firm moved to La Quinta at 79-440 Corporate Centre Drive, Suite 100 in La Quinta. Since our move we have continued to grow and are now in the top five accounting firms in the Coachella Valley. I have always been proud to live in the city of La Quinta. I believe our city has the best in both city council leadership and quality of city staff. Our city has grown very well over the past 10 years that I have been a resident and we should continue that quality of growth. I feel that I am well qualified for the position as I am a resident of the city, over 7 years of service to La Quinta, well familiar with the issues facing our city and strongly committed to the future of La Quinta. If appointed I would look at each project on it's own merits and make sure it is in line with the plan set for the city. The city must be financially strong and I would make sure to help secure the financial strength of our town. The leadership in our mayor and city council has worked well together and I would continue in that teamwork effort. With a family including four kids, three of which attend La Quinta High School and one in second grade I also understand the issues facing the families and the issues facing our youth. I appreciate your time and attention to this letter and would ask that I be appointed to the open position on the La Quinta city council. Sincerely, M. Osborne, CPA 157 C I I ATTACHMENT 3. December 5, 2002 RE CE.IVE D 2002 DEC - 6 AEI I i: 46 CITY 0 LA OUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE To the Attention of the City of La Quinta City Clerk Mayor Adolph and Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to state my intent to apply for the appointment to the open City Council seat. During this past election I ran for the open council seats and received 2758 votes which placed me in the third position by the City of La Quinta voters. I feel strongly that I should be appointed to this position because: A: Background and Qualifications — see attached B: I was the third choice for this office and have support throughout the City. C: I am motivated enough to have taken the time, energy and monetary risk to run for this position. Attached are my qualifications and history. I respectfully request that you consider the above in your Choice of an appointee for the open seat on the City of La Quinta City Council. Sincerely, <-� a2" Robert Alcala Attachments — 3 ROBERT ALCALA Robert Alcala, a fifth generation California native, became involved in La Quinta Community activities in 1993 as a volunteer for the Arts Foundation. Since that time he has been an active volunteer in many local organizations and civic functions. He teaches basic computer language at the La Quinta Senior Center and in 1998 became a member of the board of the "Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center." Bob was elected president of the "Friends" in 2001 and is still serving in that position. He was instrumental in upgrading the senior center computer lab, the purchase of an electronic piano, and acquiring the mural depicting La Quinta at the Senior Center, a combined effort of the City the Art Foundation and the "Friends." Robert is a veteran of the USAF; was stationed in Asia and Europe. Previous education was completed at the Los Angeles Community College where he studied engineering, drafting and surveying. Robert was employed at IBM for 26 years as a Customer Service Engineer specializing in computer technology and servicing selected customer accounts. Robert retired in 1992, moved to La Quinta with his wife Paulette. They have been married for 43 years, have two children and three grandchildren. 2002 CANDIDATE STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LA QUINTA ROBERT ALCALA OCCUPATION: Retired Support Customer Technical Engineer I have been active in community projects since 1993. I have volunteered at the La Quinta Art Foundation and currently serve as president of the "Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center." I strongly support the need for public safety and would work for fully staffed, well equipped, police and fire departments. Our children and families must be kept safe and our neighborhoods appealing to our growing young families. I am also interested in well planned growth and would like to see more areas set aside for senior housing as well as recreation for the youth. Our area is the fastest growing city in the valley. Growth is good, but must be well planned; reflective of our original "Village" atmosphere. As your councilman, I will listen to the needs and desires of our citizens. I would like to have the City of La Quinta be an example for other cities and keep La Quinta a true "Gem of the Desert." "SAFETY" FOR THE YOUNG, "SECURITY" FOR THE SENIORS, AND WELL PLANNED GROWTH 8/02 1G0 C14 Education and Qualifications: 2001-2002 President of "The Friends of the La Quints Senior Center" 1998-2002 member of the board of directors of "The Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center" During this time I as involved with the acquiring of 8 computers to be used at the senior center to upgrade the present computers. 1995 started teaching basic computer language. After the senior center purchased 4 computers I started teaching the different classes on computer software programs. 1993 This was the first year.I volunteered to work at the "Arts Foundation" arts show. I have done this every year since. 1992 Moved into the city of La Quinta. 1966 - 1992 Worked for IBM as a "Customer Service Rep" ( I fixed them) During this time I attended several schools for IBM to gain further knowledge of computers and equipment used with these computers. 1953-1966 In the USAF. While in the service I was stationed in Japan (2), France, Oklahoma and Hawaii. Also attended several military schools. While at the different location I was able to travel to different parts of the world and within the United States. And before this time I went to school. 161 ATTACHMENT 4. John S. Burchfield 79-970 Tangelo RECEIVED La Quints, CA 92253 2n�� F� 760-564-7484 52 johnburchf(a&aol.com CITY CITY C�ERX,QUfIV7A OFFICE December 7, 2002 City Clerk La Quints Civic Center 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 City Clerk: I would like to serve on the La Quints City Council. I am a 62 year old retired corporate executive who has lived in La Quinta for three years. This is my permanent residence and I am registered to vote in the City of La Quinta. I have held various leadership positions in business and public service organizations. I have fallen in love with La Quinta and would like to play some part in its future growth. Please find attached a resume'. While this resume focuses on my business experiences, I have tried to capture some of my charitable or public service experiences. References are available upon request. JOHN S. BURCHFIELD 79970 Tangelo Street johnburchf@aol.com La Quinta, CA 92253 Home: (760) 564-7484 SUMMARY: - A business partner able to match human resources strategies and solution, to business needs and improve business results. - A team player with strong business skills. - An energetic leader. EXPERIENCE: 1998 - Present HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTANT- Delta Airlines, Midway Airline, ASA Airline, Exelon, Denny's, Alliant Foodservices and USN Communications Provide general human resources, employee and labor relations consulting. Specific list of projects available upon request. 1992 -1998 TERRA INDUSTRIES, INC., Sioux City, IA A $2.6 billion NYSE manufacturer and distributor with 5,500 associates in the United States, Canada, and the U.K. Terra sold its distribution business in 1998. Vice President, Human Resources Reported to the CEO and directed corporate Human Resources, Administrative Services and Terra Real Estate and member of Terra's Management Committee. • Recruited a new corporate leadership team and recruited and led a human resources team that implemented People Soft HRIS and Payroll, Human Resources best practices and benchmarking. • Implemented a base, incentive and executive compensation plans tied to a new business strategy. • Identified and implemented 26 business Best Practices that improved organizational effectiveness. • Co -lead a team that selected and implemented SAP/R3 as Terra's enterprise resource platform. • Implemented performance management and pay for performance system. • Developed a job competency and 3600 - feedback process resulting in 350 individual development plans and a competency -based selection system that improved retention. • Headed a Crisis Management Team following a 1994 major plant explosion. • Expanded Terra training and development curriculum and increased training by 50%. • Redesigned healthcare plans three times and saved 50% of FASB retiree medical cost. 1988 -1991 AON CORPORATION, Chicago, IL A $3.5 billion NYSE insurance and financial services firm with 18,000 employees. Vice President, Human Resources Reported to the EVP and directed the corporate Human Resources function. • Consolidated benefit plans to improve coverage and reduce cost by 13%. • Conducted training need analysis and implemented new management development program. • Implemented new base, incentive and executive compensation plan. • Implemented a performance management system that tied pay to performance. 1985 -1988 NATIONAL EDUCATION CORPORATION, Irvine, CA A $380 million NYSE training, publishing, and education company with 4,500 employees. Vice President, Human Resources Reported to the CEO with Human Resources responsibility for 5 operating divisions. 163 Cw JOHN BURCHFIELD PAGE 2 1973 - 1985 AMERICAN HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORPORATION, Evanston, IL A $3.5 billion healthcare company acquired by BAXTER in 1985. Vice President, Personnel, Hospital Sector 1979-1985 Reported to EVP, Hospital Sector, a $2.4 billion business consisting of 11 divisions. Director of Labor/Employee Relations 1973-1979 Reported to Corporate Vice President of Personnel with responsibility for labor relations, equal employment, and the headquarters Personnel Department. 1967 - 1973 OWENS CORNING, Toledo, OH Labor Attomey, Toledo, OH Sales Engineer, Kansas City, MO 1964 - 1967 PROCTER & GAMBLE, Kansas City, KS Plant Methods Engineer Production Manager Project Engineer EDUCATION: MBA, University of Chicago - 1982 JD, University of Missouri - 1970 B.S. Ind. Eng., Iowa State University - 1962 PUBLIC SERVICE EXPERIENCES: Board of Director on two condominium associations. Advisory Board of the Dakota Dunes Country Club. Chamber of Council for Sioux City, Iowa. Board Member for: Main Street — Sioux City Boys and Girls Home and Family Service — Sioux City Information Technology Center - Chicago 1970-1973 1967-1970 1964-1967 16�� DONALD O. SPEARS P. O. BOX 908 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 (760) 771-3713 December 9, 2002 La Quinta City Council 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA92253 Re: Letter of Interest for Vacant City Council Seat Mayor Adolph and Honorable Council Members: ATTACHMENT 5. RECEIVED 2W DEC - 9 A110i 9-- 15 CITY OE L A.GuINT A CITY CLERK S OFFICE Please accept this letter along with my enclosed resume as my letter of interest for the vacant city council seat created by the election of Mr. Adolph to the La Quinta Mayoral seat. I was born in Denver, Colorado in 1949 and became a resident of California in 1971. I moved to the city of La Quinta and became a permanent resident and registered voter in July 1997. I am a retired California Peace Officer with numerous years at the management level dealing with multi million -dollar budgets and a very divergent citizenry in Orange County California. More recently, my current employment brings me in contact with many of the citizens of La Quinta. I believe my experience in listening and understanding the needs of customers coupled with my law enforcement background and experience within county government to be a superior "stepping stone" for providing outstanding service to the citizens of La Quinta. I look forward to meeting with you to further discuss my qualifications. ncerely, Donald O. Spears DONALD O. SPEARS RESUME OF QUALIFICATIONS P.O. Box 908 (760) 771-3713 78-864 Via Carmel La Quinta, CA 92253 SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS - Citizen of the United States of America - Permanent Resident of the City of La Quinta - Registered Voter - Bachelor of Arts Degree in Public Administration, University of Redlands - Associate Arts Degree in Administration of Justice, Golden West College - Completion of Basic Police Academy (see Certificates and Credentials) - 24 years experience with the Orange County Marshal's Department, Orange County, California - Well -developed expertise in the areas of public relations, customer service, personnel management, budgeting, facilities planning and civil procedures - Ability to effectively communicate verbally and in writing - Ability to develop, write, and implement policies and procedures PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Salo, Lumpy's Discount Golf and Fashion Place (11/99 to present). Seasonal part time employment. Responsibilities include sales of golf equipment. Customer Service Representative, Mesa Airlines (10/97 to 1/98). Part time employment. Responsibilities included passenger check -in, reservations and luggage handling Retired (5/23/97 to Present) Ca taro, Orange County Marshal's Department (3/84 to 5/97). Responsibilities included being second in command of 435 member law enforcement Department; forecasting and management of a $31 million annual budget; Department personnel matters including training and recruitment; management/oversight of internal affairs section; developing, writing and implementing policy and procedures; liaison between the Department, the news media and the public; legislative analysis. -1- 166 DONALD O. SPEARS RESUME OF QUALIFICATIONS P.O. Box 908 (760) 771-3713 78-864 Via Carmel La Quhda, CA 92253 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (continued) Sergeant, Orange County Marshal's Department (9/79 to 3/84). Responsibilities included the supervision of court, detention and field personnel in the performance of their assigned duties. Special investigations as assigned Investi ator, Orange County Marshal's Department (3/79 to 9/79). Responsibilities included the location and apprehension of warrant fugitives. De u II, Orange County Marshal's Department (1/76 to 3/79). Responsibilities included the service and enforcement of civil processes and minor offense warrants of arrest. Deputy I, Orange County Marshal's Department (3/73 to 1/76). Responsibilities included court security and inmate security. Manaser, Century Finance Company in Garden Grove, California (10/72 to 3/73). Responsibilities included supervision of office employees and all aspects of a small loan company. CERTIFICATES AND CREDENTIALS - Peace Officer Standards and Training Management Certificate - Peace Officer Standards and Training Supervisory Certificate - Peace Officer Standards and Training Advanced Certificate - Peace Officer Standards and Training Intermediate Certificate - Peace Officer Standards and Training Basic Certificate - Certificate of Achievement in Administration of Justice, Golden West College - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Instructor's Credential (inactive) - First Aid Instructor's Credential (inactive) - Certificate of Achievement - SABRE Travel Network - Certificate of Completion - Airline Operations -2- 16 7 C� � 1 DONALD O. SPEARS RESUME OF QUALIFICATIONS P.O. Box 908 (760) 771-3713 78-864 Via Cannel La Quinta, CA 92253 MILITARY SERVICE Service in the U.S. Marine Corps (1/69 to 1/71). Attended Administrator's School and attained the rank of Sergeant (E-5). Received an honorable discharge. SPECIAL TRAINING - Basic Police Academy - Command Hostage Negotiations - U.S. Marshal Court Security - Various Computer Courses - Court Security Management - Internal Affairs - Solving Police Personnel Problems - Grievance Handling - News Media Relations - Report Writing for Instructors - Manager's Affirmative Action Responsibilities - Protection of Public Officials - Motivation through Ethics and Values - Space Management and Facilities Planning - Professional Sales - Travel Reservationist -3 1fi8 r, r� Lw ATTACHMENT 6. William S. Bishop, Esq. General Counsel Specializing in Growing Healthy Companies Box 360 La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: 760.564.3733 Fax:760.771.3252 nn m-n December 9, 2002 �I`" OC 1 -n Z 1 ; C � � The City Clerk "� m P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing in response to the December 5th editorial which appeared in The Desert Sun. In addition to the enclosed Executive Summary, I am including a letter of recommendation written by Mark Draper. I am also enclosing an article which appeared in The Desert Sun on September 28th which describes the role I have played over the past year with respect to The Country Club of The Desert (now The Hideaway). In the event this material may be of interest to you and the City Council, is it possible to schedule a meeting with the members of the Council, so we could mutually explore the various issues involved in the undertaking of such a responsibility? c, r� A i-a I look forward to hearing from you at your convenience. Respectfull , William S. Bisho P 15g C� WILLIAMS. BISHOP, ESQ. Box 360 La Quinta, California 92253 Phone (760) 564-3733 Fax (760) 771-3252 email: WBISHOPESQ@AOL.COM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Operations Specialist Marketing and Sales Strategic Planning Financial Analysis Crisis Intervention Interim CEO Turn Around Artist Mediator/Arbitrator Special Projects ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULT • Purchased bankrupt concrete and asphalt company laden with debt... Result: as President, cut costs, tripled sales, and cleaned up balance sheet within 24 months. • Pioneered radical customer service policy that was adopted by entire industry... Result: shares of stock increased 1400%, during time served as President. • Purchased family hunting and fishing store and transformed into nationally recognized industry leader.. Result: sales increased 800% in three years with profit margins increasing every year. • Created corporate logo which appeared on all merchandise and which was instrumental in explosive growth... Result: logo has become an icon and business enjoys a cult -like following. • Turned around a failing produce and pasta company by cutting costs, adding new product lines, and implementing total quality control... Result: sales tripled, profits soared, and debt decreased by 75% in three years. • Purchased a dying commodity business and as President converted into upscale value added organization recognized as the industry leader... Result: shares of stock quadrupled in three years. • Co -mediated complex Hillview-Porter environmental clean up case at Stanford University... Result: successfully settled all claims related to $200 million clean up. Milestone in California environmental law. • Facilitated intensive week -end workshops with upper level management... Result: resolved long standing personnel conflicts and moved companies back on track by improving morale and productivity. • General Counsel of design firm responsible for creating new corporate logo and image of Wells Fargo Bank... Result: art work accepted by President and Board and now being implemented throughout western U.S... • Resolved all tax and outstanding litigation issues in role as General Counsel and Mediator... Result: company balance sheet . clean and free of uncertainty. • Directed all phases of construction and responsible for creating "The Look" of the clubhouse, including landscape & interior design. Project came in on time and under budget. POSITIONS HELD Project Director, The Palms Golf Club General Counsel, Bozell/Yuguchi Senior Mediator, Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (now JAMS/Endispute) President and Majority Shareholder, Quality Produce, Inc. Managing Partner, Silver Creek Outfitters President, 43rd Street Concrete & Asphalt Company EDUCATION University of Colorado, Major: Sociology and Economics San Francisco Law School, Juris Doctor 1 University of California At Davis, Major: Oenology and Viticulture �" , De(Puerto 7[arvesting To Whom It May Concern: October 21, 2002 This letter will serve as my highest recommendation to elect Bill Bishop to your Board of Directors. I have known Bill since 1996 when he became General Counsel and an advisor to all 3 of my closely held companies. Bill is always willing to think outside the box and has the ability to look at old problems with a fresh set of eyes. He is not afraid to challenge the status quo and is more than willing to ask the difficult questions in an appropriate manner. Perhaps most importantly everything he says and does is geared in the best interest of the company, not any specific individual. Back in 1996 when Bill came aboard, I was at a crossroads. Bill's perspective and analytical insight helped me decide to change directions. His input resulted in the closing of an un-profitable company and the expansion of one that is currently producing revenues approaching 6 million dollars annually. I believe Bill possesses the ability, intelligence, insight, and integrity to provide leadership on the Board of a publicly owned company. Please feel free to contact me if you require any further information. S' cerely Mar Draper CE Del Puerto Harvesting Co. Inc. P. O. Box 1o8to Indio, CA 92202 (760) 399-0015 171 -9755 F-AX (760) 399j 1, 4 w , ab 3 �f0 d N.3. d'y� .:, ,ir•,. CL C7 . C1 '0 -) 02 �GO'V' HU o �_e0 �;• CN 3 Opp U S CV b�A C v m fO c=7 .WQ > '� E m C% cs cc v N G q v CL 62 omm v�a�mc10 u�vv�y�u�w � Oz .d r�" w o , 1' b a .� � c b tl� a q .,y QQ a ty ,q 4. rn c0 e� d e� iqqd�J y O . V yy d7 " O j3 w n•.4 `0 '�• y .p v; w GL •.�i+ q 'C �(A.� yN v04 l� w y � � � '5 N •^ y 'e� � •u W a� t� cue a � $, �,, '�•. q.; •_., U o aa� a.ca, �bQ a�oiy .' b,r..� y -S q W > a �; z cc {y ��+ '0 "" .py� a� :�+ y V"br • off y� Q� i-O + GCl z y Z7 .-� x a w°Cd3 �►: FL �. °. d' U , . o o ;_ _ T7 ..„ a D 404 � •� � yw g��b �u� � o 5�tou... w� v � Q ,ec COay0y�p6�.q 0.0 'o; Cis y w D•d fpy�. �i a�i7 e�o� 4- "" 1 Ell 74, cc ba 'C O CA � § cya A�y CJ Cd .F td G b C~d Cad f�-i ..fir Cd w+ cc �O+ +, 4 �O i.i 4) CO ry v> 04 N� U q N �+ N Tm Z �+ 'ry N 0 ,0 N 1 O . ,d abn. ay+.,�• dj '0, Cd r. 00 o ff' -too °= b cc, ' .°� u > a o u � v a.actsV' CA :c o o a.'° c y N C C d O z C C O O Oz .. m•_ € m ��'ca �' `9 ms• c soa wC�w _ Edo ui me 9E�c� ac as k- c QCD CN d� 0Cy3� EE � yF oaf `a is c •�o chi e o cv = a c`�a <; is c CA&5 3 s G] co 3 ' j sh' c o u Am c c `o o c.4=.ac��.a E W d`� m := UUF,. niai W LE to Nay aaa v'� 09i14ti G E $�'otr'azw R a c 9 0'00 3 0 3� z, F q �a v a b n E - .. oz< .h• O `ram �j O c �GV N G Q 6S do o Cn .`1: 0 Y E C. CN -0v jog y c Fag �' c aaz ,n .0 ^ �►+ o d�Z t ea. b. Q•i.+ T..`�Z `y S >e C O O O>z HEaEi V c aEi m zaa .° •o a '�i E E� o O Z y c -152d� ao ��H C � � .. _ o y `m. d�i Z � D _ m . E• w C m O O .� — N LIJ U N: <0 '�, .57 • Q Cj N C,1 C _ a� E rn W 'JS * 4".".3= N c '�i d) N a y d 'D > w a O � E y o c c� E 2 3 = -- p �'— o E m 03 m e o f =az ?"MM .� -Q=�a� Gf ma`��2o� �r.� �r.+E�E�ne� 5aW Vir C.i 3 �..'ip . H .D > N n a N. O C .� N y cQ .`� O z m G y N Ir up ;_ o V c o c c c o N I N <a< '3 u 3 ►�+ C �.Z y. m m c $ a o c°a N `� c d> .d' zuz Gy y u u a go oa7!doa4EO OCO "'ywo Qc2N� ly yj t!0D VE c cE y Qc c auCD 0c Z pUti0 m O _.S ai O�• O�Gppr..N��„',QON[ Lo OL 'ONO' NC C-WV. 1.2 yoyCayF��8.v =°coad�NmN2 UO aa I E C V i%, .a;. aBa q� dt q � 5 m m ¢ vim.°- to 3$- �$ `�' 0 NO F° 'qO �4O, p+ u Qc7icl��7st a IG 4 .8o qCw cif � WG NS.r O• L4. S.0 A� q u04 I N W co " •.•�a"aOqQ ' D' '�O53+ .,, :p�� .�u.' ,u.p, ..9 ��`° tltly'��, O�^� �a�N'°„, " COD ned." �u° 0.p.� 0 w°p°J a i4,V ;o�Oo`t �• aei N 50 ti a, orLI 0 3 ,$ �uhp°��3b.Oq°aa� �xv�ADw,y buyuW oo �1p, �c''��°eJn�,V o .co 0 OOu «.ti�. $"0iAq „ °O co 6Cd 4. ql ur� 1_4O uvb v0nm ? C 'O = O iq N CU O U •CO O . N *E >p O LA O .,n 3 m N Wes. Dec. 9.2002 9:03PM JOHN HENDRICK No.23O9 P. 1/2 81 265 Golf View Drive La Quinta CA 92253 ATTACHMENT 7. December9, 2002 N r Ms. June Greek x City Clerk tin O City of La Quinta o Dear Ms. Greek 0 y M I am interested in being considered for the open position on the La Quinta City Council. My background includes nearly twenty years with 3M Company with various assignments in sales and marketing throughout the United States and the world. My assignments included ten years of product management, field, management and international business development. As Western Regional Manager for a joint venture of 3M, I was responsible for managing all aspects of the division's sales activities in seven states including P & L responsibility and a staff of seventy-five people including adrriristrative, technical service and sales departments. As International Manager of an office product division, I was responsible for worldwide business development, sales and marketing of facsimile products and traveled mdensively throughout the world including Europe, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia and New Zealand in support of our actives outside of the United States. 1 moved to the Coachella Valley in 1997 and to La Quinta (PGA West) in May, 2002. 1 am currently a licensed Real Estate Broker Associate with Fred Sands Desert Really. I have always been interested in local government but have not had the time until now to take an active role. Since living here in the desert, 1 have served as a volunteer mediator with the Riverside County Department of Community Action's Dispute Resolution Center in the Palm Springs court system. The California legislature has directed that all civil cases in small claims court first be given an opportunity to be resolved through mediation.... thereby saving considerable time in court and resolving roughly half the cases that otherwise would have to be heard in court.... mediators in Riverside County are required to complete thirty hours of training at UC Riverside prior to being allowed to mediate cases. I will be happy to meet with you or provide any other information that would. be helpful in making a favorable decision in appointing me to City Council. I can'be reached at home t780y7171-6511 or on my direct line at (7M774-8198. 1 hereby respectfully request that I be appointed to the open seat on the La Quinta City Council. Sincerely, )John C. do C� rn c-) G S to C1 s' cs� 174 C�� -� Dec, 9.2002 9:03PM JOHN HENDRICK No.2309 P. 2/2 JOHN C. HENDRICK 81-265 Golf View Drive La Quints, California 92253 Phone 760/ 771-6511 Experience: August 2001 to Fred Sands Desert Realty, Palm Desert, California Present Licensed Real Estate Broker August 1998 to Southland Group Inc., Aliso Viejo, California July 2001 Licensed Sales Agent Sales Manager at Lantana new home development (Palm Desert). Lead agent at Flora Vista new home development (Palm Springs). June 1998 to Palm Canyon Resort & Spa, Palm Springs, California August 1998 Licensed Sales Agent Sell timeshare property to prospective clients December 1997 to Marriott Desert Springs Villas, Palm Desert, California June 1998 Tour Guide Present timeshare program to prospective clients. July 1996 to Partners in Excellence, Fort Smith, Arkansas December 1997 Partner Distributor of telecommunication services including long distance, pagers, voice mail, etc. December 1991 to Southwest Business Systems, Inc., Fort Smith, Arkansas June 1996 President Principal of office equipment and supply company. Sold copiers, fax, computer, furniture and office supplies. November 1971 to 3M Company, St. Paul, Minnesota March 1991 National Sales Manager, Maj rAccounts Began as, sales representative in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and progressed to National Sales Manager, Major Accounts. Achieved highest sales awards available nationally as sales representative. Held various positions in sales and marketing from product marketing to international business development during 3M career. Education: 1963 College GED 1960 Fairmont Senior High School, Fairmom West Virginia Diploma ;s ELIZABETH P. BENTON f' ATTACHMENT 8. RE 2002 DEC 10 PM 3: 35 CITY OF LA ©UINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE December 10, 2002 City Council of La Quinta, California 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Council Members: I would like to express my interest in serving on the City council, as well as, serving the citizens of La Quinta. I take a great deal of pride in our community, and am very interested in the future of our fast growing city and its residents. I would bring to the council a diverse background in real estate development, investments, and finance. In my prior hometown of Nashville, Tennessee, I was very involved in the community. I served onvarious community and civic boards. I believe it is our civic responsibility to give back to the communities in which we live. Thank you for this opportunity, and I look forward to meeting each of you and discussing how I might serve our community. Sincerely, Elizabeth P. Benton 78-541 DEACON DRIVE EAST LA QUINTA, CA • 92253 PHONE: 760 564-5469 • FAX: 760 564-5463 !� EJaabefll P. Berton 1 r • 1 r, • r/..�[ ( `q9 ) 5646463 p Personal 2001-Present Permanent Resident and Registered Voter, La Quinta, CA Business 2001- Present Benton Development, L.L.C. Experience Real Estate Developer La Quinta, CA ■ Develop and fumish custom homes in Tradition Golf Club, a La Quinta residential golf community, and other Valley residential communities. 1999-Present Empirical Capital Partners General Partner- Private Investment Fund La Quinta, CAI Nashville, TN ■ One of founding principals, serve on Board of Directors. ■ Active role in introducing Institutional and high net worth Individuals to fund . ■ Licensed and registered Series 7 and 63 Investment Representative. 1994-1997 Paine-Webber Nashville, TN Account Vice President / M ---- `Salbellite Branch OBice ■ Opened branch office in major medical complex. ■ Developed and implemented marketing plan for medical community. • Managed 60 million in retail and institutional accounts. 1990.1994 Prudential Securities Associate Vice President 1987-1990 Investment Broker 1984-1986 Music Publishing Morgan Keegan & Co. Peer -Talbot Music Nashville, TN Nashville, TN 177 Education 1880-1884 Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN B.S., Sociology, Business Administration, and Economics Business Prudential Community Champions National Award (1991, 1992, 1993) Honors Nashville Magazine: 40 under 40 Future Leaders of Nashville (1992) Morgan Keegan & Co. First Year Highest Producer Award (1989) Previous Landmark Golf Club Community Board Member Community/ Vanderbilt University Reunion Chairman Civic Nashville City Club Board of Directors, President of Advisory Council, Affiliations Chairman Distinguished Lecture Series Recovery Residences of Nashville, Founding Member, Treasurer Board of Directors Crittenton Services, Treasurer Board of Directors (Nashville, TN) Arthritis Foundation, Board of Directors (Nashville, TN) Cumberland Heights, Board of Directors (Nashville, TN) Eve of Janus Benefit, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Chairman 178 ATTACHMENT 9. To: La Quinta City Clerk Re: "Letter of Interest" in appointment to the La Quinta City Council From: Don Troy 79-705 Northwood La Quinta, Ca 92253 (760) 771-3609 RECEIVED 2002 DEC - 9 AM 9: 4 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Born in Boston in 1936, Don received his Ph.D. from Boston University in 1971 in Marriage and Family Education. Postdoctoral studies include Certification as a Family Therapist from Boston Family Institute in 1973, a Real Estate Broker's License in 1976 and Certification as a Financial Planner by Denver College of Financial Planning in 1985. Don taught at Stonehill College in Massachusetts from 1962 to 1973, then moved to California as Executive Director of a national trade association of Family Therapists and Educators. He opened a Real Estate Brokerage in Huntington Beach, Ca., in 1976. He and his wife Sharron joined PGA WEST in 1988 and after raising their four children in Huntington Beach, California, they retired and moved to La Quinta full time in 1990. They are expecting their fifth grandchild in March. Don was Treasurer of the PGA West Men's Club from its founding in 1994 through 2000. He served on the Board of Directors of the PGA West Homeowners Association from 1991 to 1993 and as Secretary and now as Vice President of that Board from 1995 to the present. He has served as that Association's Chairperson of the Pool Committee and Architectural Committee and currently is Chairman of the Landscape Committee, Member of the Budget Committee and Editor of the Newsletter. Besides their home at PGA West, last summer Don and Sharron purchased two new rental houses in La Quinta cove. Since last year Don has worked as a volunteer all day every Thursday in the English Language Development and Corrective Reading classes at Thomas Jefferson Middle School in Indio. Don's grandfather served on the Boston City Council with JFK's grandfather, "Honey" Fitzgerald. Don's father was Democratic Floor Leader in the Massachusetts House of Representatives from 1936 to 1944. He himself was a candidate for the Huntington Beach City Council in 1984. He won his side of town by a landslide, but finished as runner up to candidates with heavy developer financing. He has been understandably reluctant to run again in La Quinta, but would welcome this opportunity to serve. His education and experience, together with his appreciation for La Quinta and his commitment to preserving the city's unique natural beauty and charm while sensibly planning for its future would make him an excellent member of the City Council. He is extremely grateful to be afforded this opportunity for consideration. ATTACHMENT 10. RE CEIVED 2002 DEC -9 Ali 9: 51 Request for appointment to city co�. 0 F L n o Lpffjpber 9, 2002 Submitted by Loren L. McGuire CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Members of La Quinta City Council At this time I would like to take this opportunity to officially seek your vote for the vacant City Council seat. I believe I demonstrated my commitment to the city and the citizens of La Quinta by virtue of running for the council seat via the election held on November 5d' 2002. Prior to that election, I was only known by approximately 200 people, but close to 2000 citizens saw themselves willing to elect me to office. I have attended most of the Council meetings since the beginning of the campaign period; thus I am aware of most of the issues brought before council for consideration. As a resident of north La Quinta, my appointment would serve to provide representation to this, the fastest growing geographic area, currently not represented on council. At 54 years of age, I feel I would bring a fresh, youthful approach to the present and future concerns facing this great city. Everyday more and more families are moving into La Quinta. My age and the fact that I have worked with youth groups as a coach and member of The Board of Directors for the AYSO youth succor program in Camarillo, Ca., affords me experience. This experience would serve to insure the youths of this fair city someone familiar with the concerns parents and youths alike would bring before future councils. I possess strong business, accounting, legal, and management background skills, which where acquired during my 28 years of working for General Motors. To succeed in a major corporation you have to be a team player able to work well with all types of teams. Furthermore, you must be able to think outside the box and be capable of making up your own mind on issues before you. I have embraced all these traits and will be able to bring these attributes the City Council seat Thank you for accepting and considering my application for the appointment to the vacant La Quinta city council seat. Sincerely, Alin 'e - n4jwo Loren L. McGuire ATTACHMENT 11- Stuart C. Roth RECEIVED 79-010 Via San Clara 2002 DEC - 9 PM 1: 20 La Quinta, California 92253-62#4y CIF LA ouoNTA Fax:760-564-4148 E-mail:stuart.roth@gteMirty CLERK'S OFFICE Tel:760-564-3618 Cell:760-408-9413 December 8, 2002 The City Council of the City Of La Quinta I read your notice today in the "Desert Sun," re appointments to the City Council. This is something I would be very interested in doing. Having been a resident of La Quinta for over 8 years, I have watched the rapid growth, and commercial changes in our area. I am friendly with a great many residents, not only in my gated community, but in many of the others, and many people living in the area, but not in gated communities. I know I am qualified for this position, and could be of valuable help to the city. As I am retired now, my resume that I have not used in a while, may be a bit rusty, but it gives my past history. Since that resume, I presently am on the Board of the Elizabeth & Zackery Fisher Foundation, and the greater Southern California Alzheimer's Association. While living in New York, I was on two homeowner's boards. When I was working, I ran three businesses, two overseas, and was Chairman of the Alzheimer's Association, all at the same time. I love to take on new challenges, and am not afraid of hard work. Very truly you Stuart C. Roth STUART C. BOTH TELL 760-564-3618 FAX. 760-564-4148 ....Chairman of the Board: 1992-95. Previously, Vice -Chair of the Board, Chair of the . Development Committee, in addition to various other committees. .... Presided over staff of 145 people with offices in Chicago and Washington, 212 chapters nationwide, 40,00 volunteer workers, budget of $70 million. ....Doubled the revenue and set a mark of $100 million in 1997 which will be attained ....Created a Governance Committee to streamline the board and the workings of the Association. ....Initiated a new Dues Assessment program. ....Mobilized the Association to increase awareness of Alzheimer's Disease, thru public relations. ....Revisited the Strategic Plan, to update the goals and mission. ....Involved pharmaceutical companies to set up educational awareness programs. ....Orchestrated the formation of the Ronald and Nauy Reagan Institute for Alzheimer's Research. C M=Urt Ltd. Co-founder, C.E.O of $12 million woman's sportswear design and import company, 1974-94. ....Client list included, every fine specialty and department store in the United States. ....Expanded from only blouses, to a company featuring five extensive collections a year. ....Filled a need for quality clothing at affordable prices. ....Represented by offices in Atlanta, California, New York, Montreal, Chicago, Los Angeles. ....Built a reputation for its use of color and fabrics, using only the finest cottons, wools and silks, either dyed to match, or coordinated with exclusively designed prints. ....Established in the 70's, the Ciaosport gabardine pant, became famous for its ease of wear. ....In the 80's, the use of silk tussah dyed in a variety of colors, became a signature for the company. ....Attention to detailing, hand craftsmanship, and fine tailoring made Ciaosport unique. ....Founded and became managing director of exporter agency company, 1974. ....Supervised every facet of manufacturing production for Ciaosport. ....Served as Exporter's agent for several large retail chains. .... Represented Ciaosport's overseas sales, for England, Japan, Australia, and Hong Kong. Eralda Industries. Ltd. ....Founder and Managing Director ,of trading company with offices in Hong Kong, 1970. ....The first private label company to be created in Hong Kong. ....Started. Talbots first import sweater program; first major Associated Merchandising ....Corporation's sweater program. ....Clients included: Saks Fifth Avenue, I. Magnin, The Gap, Gimbels, Macys, Talbots, Ann Taylor, Neiman Marcus, all AMC stores, (Bloomingdales, Filenes, etc.) 79-010 Via San Clara La QWnta, Co. 92253 4, 18 vrJ ATTACHMENT 12. The City of La Quinta 78 495 Calle Tampico R E C E ty E G La Quinta, CA 92253 2W DEC - 9 P rt t 4 4 CITY CLF-5ty,'S OFFICE Fred C. Davis 79-389 Calle Vista Verde La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 360-7826 email; fredngeri@aol.com I read the notice seeking applicants for appointment to fill the vacancy on the City Council; I am very interested in serving in that capacity. I have worked at the local Government level for Butte County in Northern California and have interfaced at the State and National level. I have Contract Administration and Budget background, handling all aspects of multimillion -dollar contracts and budgets. While I was Chair of the Butte County Board of Supervisors, the board: Moved all 28 departments of the county from a 30-hr./four day workweek, back to a 40-hr./five day workweek. Increased the salaries of all workers through newly negotiated contracts with 5 employee groups. Increased deputies salaries and renegotiated their contracts to multiyear contracts. All the above was done, without tax increases, through cost savings and additional one time funding from the state, which was accomplished through the State Assemblyperson and Senator's office representing Butte County in Sacramento. All department heads reporting to the Board of Supervisors were put on a "Pay for Performance", they set quantitative goals that were to be cost saving or service improvement in nature. The board evaluated these goals and raises were given based on the level that the goals were met. I was Butte County Representative at both the State (CSAC) and National (NACO) Associations of Counties„ Please feel free to contact me at the above address, phone number or my E-mail address, fredngeri@AOL.com. Thank you most sincerely for your time and consideration. Cordially, Fred C. Davis A C '7 RESUME Fred C. DaVIS 79-389 Calle Vista Verde - La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 360 - 7826 * frednaeri@AOL.com References Attached Local Government Administration * Economic Development Planning * Negotiations * Public Relations Butte County Board Of Supervisors: Chairman1997-98, Vice Chairman 1999. Introduced an Economic Element to the County General Plan. Business Park and Research & Development Park Designations as Land Uses were added. Identified properties where these elements could be developed. The types of business to be approached were selected, working closely with the Butte County Economic Development Council. As a Supervisor I was responsible for the finalization and control of the County Budget, $274,000,000.00. We had 28 departments, 24 reported to the supervisors. Contract Administration, as a Major Subcontract Administrator, Northrop Corporation, Hawthorne, CA I was responsible for contracts including, locating Sub -Contractors, submitting Requests for Bids, analyzing the bids, negotiation and award of contract and assure on time delivery, proper quality and quantity within budget to the completion of the contracts. Chairman, Butte County Board Of Supervisors, and Contract Administration: I was responsible for keeping the County and Administrators running their departments within budget and in the case of contracts administration on time deliveries meeting quality standards. Education National University — San Diego, CA BBA in Business,1983 —Graduated Cum -lade while working full time. Career Experience U. S. A. F., 1953-1957 - Airborne Radar Instructor / Technician International Rectifier / Standard Semiconductor - Semiconductor Test Engineer Aerospace: Northrop Corporation — 1962-1970 (Quality Engineer) 1975-1991 (Major Subcontract Administrator) Management: Trader Joe & Pronto Markets (Assistant Manager) 1970-1975 Butte Libraries Foundation- President & Founder (Non Profit — Public Foundation) Butte County Supervisor - November 1996- January 2001 Organizations: Butte County Board of Supervisors (elected) Chair 1997,98 -Vice Chair 1999 - member 2000 Butte County Association of Government - Chair 1997-1999, member 2000 184 ,. n Butte County Air quality Management - Chair 1997,98 - member 1999,2000 Butte County LAFCO Association — Alternate member California State Association of Counties — Director, Butte County, member, State Housing, Land Use &Transportation Committee. Presently I am a member of Both CSAC and SHLU&T as a Retired Supervisor. National Association Of Counties - Butte County Representative 1998/99 California Superior Courts — Community Focused Strategic Plan committee member 1997,98,99 Fred C. Davis References : for Fred C . Davis John Blacklock (530) 873-2785 6186 Linda Lee Ct. Former Chief Administrative Magalia, CA 95954 Officer, Butte County, CA. Mary Anne Houx (530) 891-2800 P.O.Box 1087 Butte County Supervisor Chico, CA 95927 District 3 Jon Clark (530) 879-2468 965 Fir St. Executive Director Chico, CA 95928-6301 Butte County Association of Government (BCAG) Candace Grubbs (530) 538-636 25 County Center Drive Butte County Clerk -Recorder, Oroville, CA 95965-3374 Registrar of voters Jane Dolan (530) 891-2830 PO Box 3700 Butte County Supervisor Chico, CA 95927 District 2 Dave Houser (530) 328-7607 25 County Center Drive Butte County Auditor- Oroville, CA 95965 Controller The Right Honorable (530) 538-7612 Judge Steven Howell Butte County Superior Court 1 Court Street Judge Oroville, CA 95965 Dick Puelicher (530) 538-7539 25 County Center Drive Butte County Treasurer -Tax Oroville, CA 95965 Collector Roy Wilson (760) 863-8221 46200 Oasis, Ste.318 Riverside County Supervisor Indio 92201 CASG Fred C. Davis 79-389 Calle Vista Verde La Quinta, CA 92253 Short Biography Born: Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Raised in Orange County, Southern California. Bachelors Degree in Business, (BBA), from National University, San Diego, CA. Retired from Northrop Corporation, Now, Northrop Grumman. Retired as a Major Subcontract Administrator. I have lived in LaQuinta since January 2001. My wife moved down May 2000. Served on numerous councils and committees since retiring. Past Chair — Magalia Ridge Municipal Advisory Council 1994 —1996. Past Member — Citizens Advisory Council, Butte County Association of Governments. Past President & Founder — Butte Libraries Foundation. Chair — Butte County Board of Supervisors 1997,1998, Vice Chair 1999, Member 2000. Chair — Butte County Association of Governments,1997, 98, 99, Member 2000. Chair — Butte County Air Quality Management District 1997, Member 1998,1999, 2000. Member - Butte County Citizens Advisory Council for Budget Solutions—1996-2000. Member — Butte County Consolidated Courts Planning team,1997 — 2000. 1�~ C 1x 1. '40ec 03 02 03:43p p.i DECEIVED ZOa2 OP.O - � P'ri 3: 00 C1SY Gt .1-A OFFICE C11. TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FROM; JOSEPH H. MC COY DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2002 FAX; (760) 777-7107 RE: VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ATTACHMENT 13. IN RESPONSE TO THE VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL OF LA QUINTA, I AM VERY INTERESTED IN SERVING. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN VERY ACTIVE IN EVERY COMMUNITY I HAVE RESIDED IN. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEEN ACTIVE IN THE ARTS, HEALTH AND GOVERNMENT. MY WIFE AND I RELOCATED TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA IN AUGUST, 2002 PURCHASING A HOME IN THE CITRUS. WE ARE VERY HAPPY HERE AFTER EXPLORING THE ENTIRE DESERT, WE FOUND LA QUINTA WAS OUR PREFERENCE. I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU TO MEET WITH YOU. I CAN BE REACHED AT (760) 771-6010. 188 Dec 09 02 03:43p p.2 PERSONAL RESUME OF; DATE OF BIRTH; PLACE OF BIRTH: JOSEPH H. MC COY 78-930 CITRUS STREET LA QUINTA, CA. 92253 MARCH 19, 1940 PHILADELPHIA, PA. MARITAL STATUS: MARRIED LILLIAN KALABUS Mc COY 1975 EDUCATION; GRADUATF. OF HOLY SPIRIT HTGH SCHOOL. 1959,2 YRS. SPECIAL TRAINING AND COURSES IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRNrlON, AND HOME BUILDING_ SKILLS: GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE 35 PEARS, MASTER CARPENTER, PROFESSION - Al., BOOTBALL (EAGLES) HIGH PERFOR- ANCE BOAT RACER, BOXER, COACI4 7 & 8"" GRADE ST. ANDREWS PARISH. FOOT- BALL TEAM 7 WON ,STATE CHAMPION- SHIP 2 YEARS, OFFICES I4ELD: PRESIDENT OF THE SANCTUARY HOME- OWNER'S ASSOCIATION 8 YEARS. ($240 MILLION CORPORATION) SERVED AS PRESIDENT OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, ROYAL KNIGHT FOR CANCER RESEARCH, 4'*" DEGREE KNIGHT OF COLUMBUS, OFFICER IN I -FIE MARINE CORP. 4 YEARS. EXPERIENCE: 1964 —1968 PHILADELPHIA, PA. LICENSED STATE CONTRACTOR; PROJECTS INCLUDED 42-STORY HIGH-RISE, VAUGHN WELL. EAST, BUILDING LUXURY HOMES IN LEVITTOWN, YARDLEY, REMODEL OF ST. ANDREW S PARISH, NEWTON. 1968 -• 1992 SOUTH FLORIDA, BUILT LUXURY HOMES IN HOLLYWOOD HILLS, EMERALD HILLS, HILLSBORO BEACH, HARBOR BEACH, HIGH- LAND BEACH, THE SANCTUARY, BOCA RATON. 1989 BUILT A HOME IN THE WEST END OF ASPEN. 1993 —1996 BUILT HOMES IN THE WEST END OF ASPEN, THIRD ST., Dec 09 02 03:43p p.3 JOSEPH H. MC COY PAGE 2 PRESENT: RELOCATED TO CALIFORNIA, ALWAYS A DREAM. WORKED ON BECOMING ESTABLISHED, STUDY- ING THE AREA, BECAME STATE LICENSED WITH A GENERAL STATE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE (7339488) IN 1996. I WAS RESIDING IN MALIBU WHERE I DID EXTENSIVE WORK IN BUILDING ADDITIONS AND REMODELING ALSO IN BEVERLY HILLS, HERMOSA BEACH AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS. IN 19971 BUILT A 12,000 SQ. FT. HOUSE FOR A CLIENT AND IN 19991 BUILT A 8,000 SQ. FT. HOUSE AS A SPEC WHICH SOLD ONE -HALT YEAR AGO FOR $3.4 MILLION. I HAVE SINCE RELOCATED TO LA QUINTA AND WOULD LIKE TO FIND AN OPPORTUNITY HERE AS MY WIFE AND I HAVE BEEN COMING HERE FOR OVER THREE YEARS AND ALWAYS WANTED TO RELOCATE. lso c ATTACHMENT 14. 44-215 Villeta Drive R E C'E I V E-D La Quinta, CA 92253 December 10, 2002 Ms June S. Greek, City Clerk 2002 DEC I J AM 11: 0 3 City of La Quinta CITY OF LA QUINTA P.O. Box 1504 CITY CL E!'K'S OFFICE La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject: Letter of Interest — La Quinta City Council Appointment Attachment: List of Current and Past Volunteer Activities for the City of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley Community. Dear June — Please be informed that I am indeed interested in being appointed to fill the existing vacancy on the La Quinta City Council, a position for which I feel eminently qualified. My wife, Louise, and I have been permanent, full time residents of La Quinta, at the above address, since November 1991. I am a registered voter, and have voted in every election since attaining voting age. In the spring of 1992, shortly after moving to La Quinta, I made my initial entry into the La Quinta government process by actively participating in a neighborhood traffic circulation issue. That issue was resolved — to our satisfaction — by the City Council at their meeting of February 16, 1993. About that same time, I also became involved with the Quinterra build -out controversy, which ultimately led to the existing Compatibility Review requirement (9.60.300) of the La Quinta Zoning Code. Attached is a list of the major La Quinta and Coachella Valley volunteer activities with which I am, or have been, associated. In addition, I have attended numerous community meetings and hearings dealing with such subjects as CVAG 2020, Washington Street Ultimate Design, The Indian Wells Tennis Garden, Jefferson Street Ultimate Design, Annexation, and the Riverside County General Plan Update. Several of my activities have included representatives from neighboring communities — e.g. the P.S. International Airport Commission and the IID PCAC. Participation in such organizations has given me insight relative to inter -City consensus building, and has also given me recognition and respect throughout the Coachella Valley. Both would be useful assets as a Council Member. Shortly after my unsuccessful Candidacy for City Council in November 1995, I was appointed to the La Quinta Planning Commission, where I have served continuously ever since. During my seven year tenure, I have done due diligence on a myriad of developments and issues pertinent to our City. I have also attended a number of City Planning Seminars and Forums presented by the American Planning Association, as well as several annual Planners Institutes conducted by the League of California Cities. Through these means, I have gained in-depth insight into the inner workings of local government. As a member, Vice -Chairman and Chairman, I've participated in and/or conducted numerous Planning Commission Public Hearings. Perhaps the most significant effort was the lengthy, joint City Council / Planning Commission process for updating the La Quinta General Plan that was approved in March 2002. 1 l b 191 As a Foster Parent (and about -to -be Adoptive Parent), my appreciation of the importance of the City's commitment to the youth of our Community has been renewed. Although the Community Park that is currently under construction will provide another much needed athletic venue (primarily Soccer), the City must continue to be alert to additional opportunities to foster youth programs. For example, the planning process for the RDA's The Ranch must certainly include provisions for a robust Junior Golf program. In the eleven years that I have resided in La Quinta, the population of our City has increased three -fold. Although the City's retail and commercial components have not maintained that same pace, several new projects that have been approved or announced in the past few months will help bridge the gap and enhance our tax base. I am proud to have played an active role in La Quinta's growth. For several years, I have been a regular attendee, observer and participant at La Quinta City Council sessions. Through those actions, plus participation in numerous joint City Council / Planning Commission meetings, I have developed an appreciation of the goals, objectives, and modus operandi of our City Council. I have also learned first hand that the City Council's role in local government is significantly different than that of the Planning Commission. Council Members are directly responsible to the residents of the City, and all their actions are subject to intense public scrutiny. This is an awesome responsibility, but one that I am willing and anxious to accept. In the next few years, La Quinta is likely to be faced with as -yet -unknown financial challenges, perpetrated by Proposition 218, the defeat of Measure M, and the probable trickle -down effects of California's budget crisis. It may be very difficult for our City to maintain — let alone enhance — its currently sound financial position. Obviously, in that environment, the City Council will be forced to make some tough decisions from time to time. My commitment to Public Service has been well documented, as has my ability to make informed, objective decisions. Thank you for providing the opportunity for me to offer my services on the La Quinta City Council. I plan to attend the Council Meeting on December 17'', and will be available to respond to any further questioning at that time, as part of the selection process. Robert T. Tyler 19� 2 ROBERT T. TYLER DECEMBER 10, 2002 ATTACHMENT TO LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION Listed below are some of my current and past volunteer contributions to the City of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley Community. CURRENT ACTIVITIES • 1 /96 to Present: Commissioner, La Quinta Planning Commission. (Past Vice -Chairman & Chairman, currently Vice -Chairman) • 9/97 to Present: La Quinta Commissioner, Palm Springs International Airport Commission. (Vice-Chairman,_FY 2001-02) • 9/94 to Present: Instructor, AARP Driver Safety Course (Exclusively at La Quinta Senior Center since 6/98.) • 4/01 to Present: Quartermaster, La Quinta VFW Post 855 • 10/99 to Present: Foster Parent • 2002 Honoree - La Quinta Inspirational Senior Award PAST ACTIVITIES • 3/97 to 12/01: La Quinta Representative, Imperial Irrigation District Power Consumers Advisory Committee (PCAC) • /�00,: La Quinta "Team" participant in the Relay for Life • 11 /95: Candidate for La Quinta City Council • 6/95 to 1/96: Commissioner, La Quinta Human Services Commission a 4/95 to 5/99: Co -Chairman, Greater Coachella Valley Soap Box Derby 193 Ka ATTACHMENT 15. RECEIVED T. SWIFT LOCKARD 216,02 AM to: O I 54775 AVENIDA ALVARADO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 CIT Y Or LA QUINTA Tel/FAX: (760)771-0925 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE December 7, 2002 The La Quinta City Council City Hall La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Council Members: I wish to apply for appointment to the open La Quinta City Council seat as reported in THE DESERT SUN. My wife and I are former Easterners who moved to Los Angeles in 1978 where I was involved in the magazine publishing industry (see Who's Who in America reprint enclosed). In 1989 we moved to Indian Wells and established a small publishing company to serve the Desert Communities. The La Quinta Arts Festival program was among the items we published. Mrs. Lockard, an editor and experienced English teacher, was hired by Desert Sands Unified School District to teach at the then new La Quinta Middle School where she continues to teach. We became more familiar with La Quinta, liked what we saw, purchased some land in the city, and moved here over six years ago. Our eldest daughter and family also moved here from Los Angeles. I like the development the City of La Quinta government has accomplished and plans to continue to accomplish - vibrant, appealing, and forward -thinking - for its residents and for those who will inevitably be attracted to our growing community. Although I have not served on a city governing board, I have served as vice president of the Montclair, New Jersey Board of Education during periods of racial strife and expanded growth, calling for unusual knowledge and understanding of the needs of a diverse population. I also served on the City of Indian Wells Marketing Committee when we were residents of that city. My work continues on two distinct fronts which keeps me up -to -speed with two of La Quinta's prime areas of growth. For the past five years I have worked on tourism publications for the state of California and for our Pahn Springs Desert Resorts Convention & Visitors Bureau. Currently, I am working on the CVA's new hotel in -room video system to be introduced later this month. And since "9/11" I have been substitute teaching in the DSUSD system with most of my work concentrated with La Quinta schools. Tourism is important not only for our valley but also for La Quinta. Our schools are of prime importance to our citizens and to our city. Understanding the importance of public relations, of getting the right story out at the right time has long been my role. I believe my experience can compliment the current council in its quest to make La Quinta truly "The Gem of the Desert". I would welcome that opportunity. Sincerely, T. Swift ockard Enclosure:1 194 W �fli �� 1N �1AALr�t,a �iC~� �a,,i-►�► �99�' � •8� volu%ka Z, L-w, Z , ke u r LOCKARD, THOMAS SWIFT, JR, mag. pub.; b. Columbia, Pa., Aug. 12, 1924; s. Thomas Swift and Bertha Mary (Jewell) L.; B.A. in Econs., Franklin and Marshall Coll., 1950; m. Blanche Galbraith Miller, June 12, 1955; children-Christianne Jewel, Rebecca Galbraith, Katherine Rossiter. Asso. sales du. Sports Iglus., Time, Inc., 1953-67; v.p. advt., sales dir. N.Y. Mag., 1967-72; v.p. Mktg. Mag Pubs. Assn., 1972-74; v.p., also. pub. Sat. Rev., 1974.76; dir.. mktg. Petersen Pub., 1976-77; v.p., also. pub. New West Mag., Beverly Hills, Calif., 1978-80; dir. spl. mag. projects Knapp Communications Corp.; lectr. pub. procedures Radcliffe Coll.; lectr. U. So. Calif. Mem. Montclair (N.J.) Bd. Edn., 1969-71. Served to It. comdr., USNR. 1943-46, 50-53. Mem. Advt. Club Los Angeles, Mag. Pubs. Assn., Western Pub. Assn. (dir.). Republican. Club: Ironwood Country (Palm Desert, Calif.). Home: 13680 Bayliss Rd Los Angeles CA 90049 Office: 5900 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles CA 90036 195 TF,--i,.,, C - -r1, ri i -V ri (-14-N.- Sent By: EMMONS; 7605641449; Dec-10-02 110 2AM; Page 2 ATTACHMENT 16. December 10, 2002 Robert and Carol Emmons 80-560 Weiskopf Way La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 564-1449 City Council of the City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 78-496 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Vacancy on the i,a Quinta City Council Dear Members: Enclosed is a copy of my resume, along with a copy of the application 1 submitted several months ago to serve on the La Quinta City (Tanning Commission. Unfortunately, since I was out of town during the interviews, I did not have the opportunity to speak to the members of the City Council during the selection process for the two available seats on the planning commission and was not selected to serve. I did appreciate the opportunity to be considered for the position, and once again appreciate the opportunity to `throw my hat in the ring", as they say, for the position on the City Council. I am doing this at the urging of several residents of La Quinta, they knowing more than I that one of my deepest desires is to serve in a role in government so that I can actual ly make a difference in people's lives. With regard to local civic service, I have served on several committees for homeowners associations, and continue to remain active in the affairs of the association in which we currently reside. My husband and I are also charter members of a City of Hope chapter in La Quinta known as "Gems of the Desert", and 1 am co-chair for the women's golf invitational to be held in the desert for the City of Hope in 2004. City of I lope is a cancer research hospital and is listed by Forbes magazine as one of the countries most important charities, and ranked by the National Charities Information Bureau as one of the top five health charities in the nation. Professionally, I am a CPA having recently retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers. I have extensive experience in both audit and tax for Fortune 500 companies, including mutual fund companies, banks and charities. Having always been concerned about education, I coordinated the continuing education program for the Newport Beach office for PricewaterhouseCoopers, and initiated and organized a business tutoring program while serving as President of a college business organization. As a part-time resident of La Quinta for 4 years and a full-time resident for 2, I have witnessed 196 explosive growth in the city. I am concerned as many residents regarding the direction of the city and its vision for its future. The myriad problems facing a city such as La Quinta must be " f Sent By: EMMONS; 76056414495 Dec-10-02 11:13AM; Page 3/7 City Council of the City of La Quinta Page Two December 10, 2002 met with clarity of purpose and an open mind to solutions. My expertise in understanding complex situations and analyzing solutions, I believe, would enhance the work of the City Council as they strive to balance the issues of growth with quality of life for both the new and existing city's residents. I look forward to meeting with you, and appreciate your consideration to till the vacancy on the City Council. Respectfully, Carol Emmons Enclosure 197 Sent By: EMMONS; 7605641449; Dec-10-02 11:14AM; Page 5/7 Date: May 27, 2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: Carol Emmons IIOME ADDRESS: 80560 Weiskopf Way La Quinta, CA 92253 BUSINESS ADDRESS: None 1'EI.EPHONE (HOMF,): (760) 564-1449 (BUSINESS): None IF EMPLOYED, WHERE. YOU WORK AND POSPfTON YOU HOLD: Retired LF'NC►TH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 1 %2 yrs full-time resident; 4 yrs part-time IiAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? No Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Occupation. Certified Public Accountant Education: BS Accounting, Magna Cum Laude, California State University, Northridge, 1985 MS Taxation, California State University, Fullerton, 1995 Certificate in Interior Design, Interior Design Institute, Newport Beach, 2001 Work Experience: Over 12 years of experience in public accounting. Retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers as a Tax Senior Manager in October 2000. Developed strategies for clients in acquisition planning and restructuring designed to maximize tax benefits; performed tax due diligence activities related to the acquisition of numerous entities, and assisted clients to successfully integrate the acquired company into the overall company structure. Managed overall global tax compliance and tax muiimi7.ation efforts, and evaluated strategies available to achieve maximum benefit, including cost segregation studies, R & D credit studies, transfer pricing documentation, and state tax planning. Assisted clients with FAS 109 interpretation and reporting Sent By: EMMONS; 7605641449; Dec-10-02 11:14AM; Page 6/7 requirements, and successfully represented numerous clients undergoing federal and state income tax audits. Having recently retired from public accounting, the opportunity has presented itself to pursue a life-long passion in design. Completed a Certificate in Interior Design from the Interior Design Institute in Newport Beach in December 2001, and elected to continue and pursue a degree. Study requirements include space planning, architectural drafting, design theory, building codes, color theory, and history of architecture. Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. Reviewed the enacting ordinance for the planning commission. No other documentation has been received or reviewed at this time. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? It is my understanding that the City of La Quinta is one of the five fastest growing cities in California. With the recent influx of residents and businesses, there are many challenges facing the city to balance the demands of an ever-growing population with an appropriate vision for a developing city. Assuming the city council has articulated their vision for the city in a formal vision statement, the question is whether or not the existing overall city plan accomplishes the goals set forth in that vision statement. Further, when reviewing applications from businesses to develop property, does the current. city planning commission take into account whether or not such proposed development meets the goals Of the city's vision statement, and the effect that such proposal will have on the overall city plan? Currently, many residents of La Quinta arc questioning whether or not a vision statement for the city exists, and if it does exist, does it reflect the quality of life desired by the La Quinta residents. Further, many residents are concerned that the Highway I I I corridor is being poorly developed. Examples given include the gas station and fast food restaurants at Happy Point, and current plans to build a 99 Cent Store next to Home Depot. Development in such a fashion may devalue the city to a point where the city may lose its ability to attract the types of businesses and establishments constructed at the recently completed development in Rancho Mirage known as "The River". The lost potential of such premium land is palpable, acid its impact on future development will affect the citizens of La Quinta for many years to come. The expression that, "Rancho Mirage gets The River and La Quinta gets the 99 Cent Store", is being heard throughout the city, and needs to be addressed before it is too late to change course. One suggestion would be to have an overall review of both the vision statement and the current overall city plan.. Such a review will require the city council kind planning commission to look afresh at what type of city we want for our residents, and the impact that any proposed development will have on future city plans. Further, the city should consult with other cities in the area, such as Palm Desert, Indian Wells and Rancho Mirage, to determine what kind of problems they have encountered and how 19 those problems can be avoided in the future. Much can be learned from these cities, which have had .9 many successes and few failures. ( , Sent By: EMMONS; 7605641449; Dec-10-02 11:15AM; Page 7/7 r What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enh work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? ante the I have always believed that it is important to keep focused on your goals, and not to get lost in the details. Further, compromise is sometimes the only way to get things accomplished, and is a to remove stumbling blocks on the road to success. appropriate I have always been a team player and have always consulted with those around me. Consensus is important so that all members of the team can commit to accomplishing the goal. My professional firms, i.e., PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & work experience with two of the Big 5 accounting Young, have prepared me to meet any challenge presented with professionalism and courtesy. M Commission. ons expertise in understanding complex situations and analyzing soluti,l believe, would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Sent By: EMMONS; 7605641449; Dec-10-02 11:13AM; Page 417 - CD (n (n A m 0 O O c� O tQ 3 � �• w � 3 CD r- c m o c m n 0 0 c 3 o � (D c CD 2 a 3 a m a A • • m m c cr cr= m CD Q WC CD Q 7 m 3 0 C 25 O f' D W 0 m a o a 4) a 3 o °1 C O 3 a • U) • • t m � 0 c c D °' m n ?� C(D o i2 0 O �D O m <D ��pp Aj < j _ C 0 ' CDC m lD N� 'C �D (O A C .0 N X W N CD 13 N ¢1 .3. m fD m ^� m tQ o CD cp o 0 D it wam4N x 0 a to 2.cD � m`� o m. CD m j C C n n A 3( m Z o 0 0� 0 3 G. 0 y m 3 0 a m u� � n y c O n .Oa A O n O n. ch — m 'O a y' A c f° - tp `�. 0 o a (D Q. !o =. CD o o _� cv n co O 0 'O 0 _O �(D :3 (D. sn `o Ocl c�s`a m m 0 a ^N�►. R O ( a m .0 C rD' O i►! La. CL 3 N:3 °tea CD 0 $- N 3OC _ Q• 3 ,. s� a .0 �. 0 3 0 w m 00 0_0 Vic 2 m y 0 �3�. w a. Q � o ca c 0 (D uo, o.:.m 2aa c a FD' Q o s. w w �v� a, g CD < Ch N w rb cD w y N 3 N W (�A (D a 9D = 0 r = CD 3 CD m c� L1. Qr� r ? O O (D FDO O co m 3 3 201 ATTACHMENT 17. DECEMBER 10,2002 RECEIVED 2002 DEC L0 PM 4: 50 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR DON LPH FI� UINtA COUNCIL PERSONS STANLE Y� t�rc ,OFFICE TERRY HENDERSON, AND RON PERKINS. FROM: JACQUES ABELS AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO SUBMIT MY LETTER FOR CONSIDERATION OF BEING APPOINTED TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA TO FILL THE EXISTING VACANCY. YOU ARE AWARE OF MY QUALIFICATIONS FROM THE EIGHT YEARS SERVING ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION. HOWEVER, I WILL LIST THESE BELOW. IF YOU WOULD REFER TO THE EDITORIAL PUBLISHED IN THE DESERT SUN LAST THURSDAY DECEMBER 5T", I FEEL THAT I HAVE MET ALL THESE QUALIFICATIONS LISTED. LIVED IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR THE PAST PLUS THIRTY YEARS. MEMBER OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FIRST COMMITTEE IN THE QUEST FOR CITYHOOD FORMATION. � 202 PAST PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE YMCA IN THE SAN FERANDO VALLEY..1972 1973. PAST PRESIENT OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF STUDIO CITY 1973-1974. PAST PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD DIRECTORS OF THE DESERT VALLEY LIFE UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION ..1979-1980. APPOINTED TO THE COACHELLA PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD TO REPRESENT LA QUINTA FROM 1984 TO 1992. BOARD CHAIRMAN THREE TIMES. SERVED AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF INQUIRY IN THE FINANCIAL SITUATION WITH LA QUINTA IN 1992. APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN 1994 AND HAVING SERVED EIGHT YEARS WITH ONE AND ONE HALF YEARS REMAINING ON MY PRESENT TERM. CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION THREE TIMES. TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION OF MY PAST HISTORY, I RESPECTIVELY APPLY FOR THIS VACANT SEAT. 201 . W% PLEASE NOTE THAT I HAVE THE TIME AND ENERGY FOR THIS POSITION. IF YOU NEED FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL ME AT 771 3433. 49 990 AVENIDA MONTERO (PO BOX 1416) LA QUINTA, CA. 92253 204 firu[ v 'J ATTACHMENT 18. ,--1QUWW CQ600 W.,&4 RECEIVE 2002 DEC I t) AM 11 '. 41 49-095 CALLE FLORA -LA QUINTA, CA 92253.760/771-0348•FAX 760/ 6 CITYO LAFRK.CIUW' 4 December 2002 CIT Y OFFICE City Clerk City of La Quinta 78 495 Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: City Council Appointee Dear Sir: I would like to be considered for the subject position. My business and civic experience are such that I believe I could provide valuable expertise to the current city Council. My wife and I have been residents of the Coachella Valley for over30 years and of the City of La Quinta for the past 10 years. I have been a member of the La Quinta Resort & Club (previously Landmark) for over 20 years and a member and Vice President of the Club's Advisory Board of Governors for 6 years. We are very active in many of the La Quinta area programs and activities. Prior to making La Quinta our sole residence in 1990, we lived in Avalon, Cal. Where I served as Vice Chairman of the Hospital Board, Chairman of the Automobile review Board, Chairman of the Community Development Agency and an Avalon City Councilman for 4 years. My career covers over 45 years in Banking and International finance at the upper management level. My education includes numerous Management training type courses with degrees in Law and Finance. I would be happy to discuss my further qualifications in person. Very ly, Paul R. Puma, Sr. 2o5 Dec 12 02 08:47a INTL FINRNCIRL 760 771 0326 p.2 49-095 CALLE FLORA•LA QUINTA, CA 92253.760/777-0348•FAX 760/771-0326 RESUME' PAULR. PUMA,SR. 1971 to Present: PUMA ASSOCIATES/ INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES: Partner and Associate. Company provides financial and marketing cxpertisi and assistance to major aircraft manufacturers and Distributors in moving their used and new pr.)ducts in the Domestic and International Market. Represented Hughes Helicopter Licensee! in Italy, Argentina and Distributors in Philippines, Indonesia, Brazil, Germany and several African countries including South Africa. Negotiated sale and financing for major sales of aircraft and other company scrn7ces. Provides Banking services or multi bank consolidated financing as required. 1972 To 1998: Director, Western Bank, Los Angeles, Calif; Represented frank as Director and solicited consumer deposits and Correspondent Banking Relationships in Europe and elsewhere. 1975 to 1978: Foreign Credit Insurance Association (Commercial arm of EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF WASHINGTON) Vice President. Western Region. Responsible for aigministration and marketing of FCIA programs covering sale of American Exports through Government Ins.rred programs administered by Banks. Responsible for all aircraft programs for the United States and overseas liaison with buyer, banks, operators, manufacturers and appropriate governmental agencies. LiW son with top management of all Fortune 500 corporations in the region and related Department of Con merce and State personnel. 1965 to 1975: Summa Corporation (Hughes Helicopters) Organi-red:md served as CEO of finance Program to handle sale of Hughes Helicopters and other company interests in the domestic and International Market. Negotiated financing of Helicopters, AirWest aircraft and other Summa interests. Negotiated multi -bank financing; for sales in excess of 100MM. 1956 to 1975 Westinghouse Credit Corporation: Western Regional Manager 1951 to 1957 General Motors Acceptance Corporation Paul R. Puma is a lifelong resident of Southern California. Mr. Puma's Father, Samuel J. Puma, Sr. was a licensed Stock Broker, Real Estate Broker, Insurance Broker and President and CEO of Commercial Finance Company for 30 years. He is experienced in all phases of cor: Sumer and corporate finance, holds degrees B.A. , D. C., and LLB from local Universities. Civic contributions include Councilman, Avalon, Ca., Mayors Adviso y Committee, Los Angeles, Loaned Executive Program, United Way, Los Angeles, Rotary Club, Lions Clrrb, and Elks Club. Various Children and Teen programs including ScaScouts, Pop Warner Football, Little league baseball and CDC (Catholic Youth) 206 fr, t .-. t i I ATTACHMENT 19. MYRON E. MINTZ RECEIVED 80-355 Weiskopf La Quinta, CA 92253 2002 DEC -9 AN 8: 46 •��• Phone(760) 771-0402 CITY OF LA QUINTA Fax (760) 771-1154 CITY CLERIC'S OFFICE Email DesertMintz@aol.com December 9, 2002 I am Myron E. Mintz and it is my privilege to apply for the vacancy on the La Quinta City Council. I am a retired Podiatrist and Foot Surgeon having lived and worked in the San Francisco Bay Area for over 30 years. I have been married for 33 years and have 2 adult children. Our daughter is a 1996 graduate of Cal State, Long Beach and is a Teacher of Primary Education in Torrance, California. Our son is a 1999 graduate of The United States Military Academy at West Point and is now serving as a Captain in the U.S. Army stationed in Germany. After graduating from High School in Wilmington, Delaware, I enlisted in the U.S. Air Force. I served three years in the Medical Corps, was honorably discharged and went on to attend college and Podiatric Medical School. During my podiatric career, I was an Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine at the California College of Podiatric Medicine. I owned one practice, was partner in another, and worked in 2 others. In addition, I served in the capacity of Clinical Staff Podiatrist at Mt. Zion Hospital in San Francisco for 19 years. Civic Involvement: • Currently on the Landscape Committee for the Fairways HOA at PGAWest • Currently the Alternate District Delegate • Financial supporter of The La Quinta Arts Foundation, McCallum Theater and The Living Desert • Health provider for March of Dimes and other City Health Fairs • Medical Advisor for San Francisco Pop Warner Football • Director of Migrant Farm Workers Podiatric Program • Co -leader Special Projects for San Francisco Peninsula Girl Scouts and Cub Scouts • Campaign Manager Atherton City Council Election • Booster Parent for AYSO and CYSA • Volunteer for San Francisco Russian Emigre Program • Vice President and then President of the West Point Parents Club of Northern California. During which time I enhanced many of the programs and obtained tax exempt status for the Organization I have been a resident of La Quinta for over 2 years and can add an objective, newcomer's point of view. I have no hidden agenda. I am an innovative and a forward -thinking individual and have the ability to make my own decisions based on the facts before me. I have a working knowledge of how state and city governments work and have an excellent business sense. I have strong interests in issues of our youths and feel I would be an asset to the City Council. T you for ur consideration, 207 JOHN C. DOYLE ATTACHMENT 20. 52-895 Ave. Herrera, La Quinta, CA. 92253 December 5, 2002 Dear Council Members: It has been brought to my attention that you are seeking to fill a vacant position for the La Quinta city council. On this last election I was unable to get my name on the ballet due to the loss of my mother on July 21. of this year. As you know, this was right about the time we all had to acquire our signatures and turn them in to meet the deadline. Since I had to attend to the- arrangements of my mothers funeral and her estate; I was not able to participate in the election. After reading the Desert Sun I was excited to see that I have a second chance at becoming a city council member and not having to wait for the next election. I would like you to consider me for the future city council member position. I am a 24- year-old male that currently resides in La Quinta. I work for International House of Pancakes as the Assistant Manager. I previously worked for Carl's Jr. as a General Manager. I believe that my past work history and the constant interaction I have with the public would bring a new and vibrant relationship to our community and the council. I feel I have a lot to offer to the city and would love the opportunity to make a difference in the community. In no way possible do I feel I would be a dissapointment to the council or to the citizens of La Quinta. I can be reached at 760-771-5666 or 760-899-3243. Thank you for your time and consideration and I look forward to hearing from you in the very near future. Thank y John C. Doy 20 Citizen r 51-52o ai wswa .Natwmaw .ea auuda, ea 92253 760.564.4845 December 6, 2002 Dear citycouncil members: It has -become know to me that the city council is short one member_ I currently reside in La Quinta and would like to take this opportunity to suggest someone for your consideration as a council member. His name is John Doyle_ I have known John for about four years now and have seen many good things come from him_ Not only is he a model citizen for the people of La Quinta, he has done a lot for himself. If he could do even half of what he does for himself for the city of La Quinta, then I believe we are in good hands. He is a well -minded and rational person. He takes his time in making any choice that may arrive. He could be exactly what this city is looking for_ That is why, without a doubt, .I will strive to see John on the city council, for not only me,but for the citizens of La Quintalperiod. Sincerely, Bruce R. Andrews La Quinta-Resident n CA o © rn m M�" — 0 G rn A > vi M r O� O ti Z .� -i n> W En M ATTACHMENT 21. December 7,2002 Joan Rebich 53-810 Avenida Cortez LaQuinta, Ca. 92253 City Council of La Quinta La Quinta, Ca. 92253 Dear Council Members: RECEIVED 200? DEC - . j AM 10' 41 CITY OF LA OUINTA CITY CLERIC'S OFFICE I am interested in being considered to fill the vacant position on the City Council. As a resident of LaQuinta since Jan, 1993, I have been involved in its progress, first as a member of the Human Services Commission and then the Community Services Commission from 1998 to 2002. Since early retirement from my position as a Children's Services Worker with Riverside County, I have enjoyed more available time for community service and wish to devote it to my community in a meaningful way. I see the vision of La Quinta as has been directed by the current Council as leaning toward controlled growth which allows for needed commercial development for a strong tax base. This development should, at the same time, be cognizant of the desires of individual city residents to retain a small town atmosphere and preserve the mountain conservancy. Current expansion of Old Town LaQuinta is very much in line with such needs. Future expansion of the city through the current area of interest in the direction of Thermal and the Thermal airport is a feasible opportunity to provide some industrial base to the city's resources. More immediately viable is the opportunity to provide bed taxes and a quality recreational opportunity to LaQuinta residents through development of the municipal golf course. I have the time, energy and interest available to devote to the promotion of our city to its fullest future potential. Thank you for considering me as a potential City Councilman. Sincerely yours, Joa ebich 210 ATTACHMENT 22. December 9, 2002 Honorable Mayor City Council Members 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta California 92253 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: RECEIVED 2002 DEC 1:2 Phi 12: 5 7 CITY OF L t{ QUINTA CITY CLIE-RX'S OFFICE Having been actively involved with the City of La Quinta for the past three years, I would be honored to serve the City in the capacity of a council member. I am enclosing a detailed list of my past experiences, positions, my volunteer work in Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley. As verification, please see the attached documentation. I strongly feel that I would be an asset to the La Quinta City Council. I have had the privilege of personally getting to know each of you. It has been a pleasure and I look forward to serving you in the future, in whatever capacity. Thanking you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Else Loudon Chair Cultural Arts Commission 211 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ELSE LOUDON My special forte is public relations, negotiating, mediating with people, event coordination and fundraising. I am very open minded, a good listener and always try to work harmoniously with committees. To achieve cooperation, one must delegate, but also be willing to contribute. I personally started and developed two large companies. My work, especially in one of the companies, gave me a degree in "hands on" psychology. Explicitly, it gave me an opportunity to analyze each individual and determine his or her needs. The following is a summary of my applicable experiences: 1. Studied dance and ballet 2. Modeled for fashion and photography 3. Elected to participate in the Miss Germany competition 4. Decided to finish my education and received the U.S. equivalent of a Bachelor's and Master's degree. 5. Arrived in California from Germany in 1955, applied and was accepted at NBC as secretary to the West Coast television sales manager 6. Attended night school to broaden my knowledge of the broadcasting business and American office management 7. Elected "Miss NBC" shortly after starting my job 8. Left NBC due to engagement with top executive 9. Personal secretary to the president of Foote, Cone and Belding, a Hollywood advertising agency 10. Resigned for the purpose of marriage and continued cooking and educational classes 11. Started volunteer work with the Sherman Oaks Jr. Woman's Club, see attachment and pictures 12. Acknowledged by the US Senate, see letter 13. Started teaching German classes, became principal and worked as such 14 years with a staff of 16 14. Taught German at the Cal Prep School in Encino, all levels (Michael Jackson and siblings attended) see newspaper article 15. United European American Club; instructed evening classes, see picture 16. Invited to join the Assistance League of Southern California, where I held numerous leading positions, see pictures and articles 17. Moved to La Quinta due to physical problems and started my volunteer work 18. Volunteered as teacher at the Rancho Mirage library for 2 years 19. Assisted with the symposium at City Hall, see thank you letter 20. Volunteered for the "Artist in the Courtyard" program 21. Joined the Historical Society and helped solicit donations for the annual fundraiser 22. Asked to join the Coachella Valley Arts Alliance and chaired the first symposium at the Desert Willow Golf Resort 23. Nominated VP Ways and Means; co-chaired the first `Breakfast with the Media" at the Miramonte Hotel. 24. Attended Cultural Arts Commission meetings to get better informed about the La Quinta arts projects 25. Applied for a position on the CAC and was appointed commissioner 26. Chaired the first fundraiser dinner dance at the Ritz Carlton for the CVAA 27. Represented the Cultural Arts Commission (replacing Rosita Shamis, due to surgery) on the special committee for the La Quinta 20'" Anniversary Celebration. Helped to provide free entertainment 28. Nominated and appointer) chair of the Cultural Arts Commission 29. Chaired the "Artist Partnership Day" at the La Quinta High School and Middle School 30. Chaired the second fmdraiser dinner dance at The Lodge for the CVAA 212 THE BURGOMASTER AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF AMSTERDAM TAKE PLEASURE IN WELCOMING YOU TO THE CAPITAL OF THE NETHERLANDS. 'Mrs. Be 9-oudon THIS WILL CERTIFY THAT YOU ARE CONSIDERED AN HONORARY GOODWILL AMBASSADOR OF AMSTERDAM E. van Thijn Burgomaster v sDO FF z m r = m m Z D m 0 1> z O 0 C Z m m n m O O m m 0 0 r T 0 0 Y V ' Z con zm C COO mD �CO() Dz m m> � rn -� C 0 cn m z =mom rn0 < Z n -n O U) �0 = m z r— �� D m o Tn d r O 0 < N n O rn x r z O m co z N r r Z —� r 00 > 7rl 21 s *vCrOv, Mahn Xr. 5 this certificate is ttwarbeb to .SLC;u3C in appreciation of her time anb effort as ( Uli1 '� i+l l•i_1�T for the club year 1"67-19b DEAN OF CHAIRMEN PRESI NT �x Maks fix. - Cilia certificate is at<uarbeb to in appreciation of her time anb effort as for the club yeaf - DEAN OF CHAIRMEN PRE ENT u-1.17 q Volume 51, No. 2, October1985 Opening the Door ALSC's 1986 All -League Benefit will help to open the door for those in need, through the League's nine community services. Chaired by Else Loudon, ALSC's Vice President Ways and Means, "The Swinging Years," set for Sunday, March 2, 1986 at the Sheraton Premiere Hotel, will feature the 17-piece "Harry James Band" for your dancing and listening pleasure. A first for the All -League Benefit is the announcement of three awards to be given for outstanding philanthropic contribution. The awards are: Third Annual Humanitarian Award, Community Award and President's Award. A seven day cruise to Mexico with deluxe accommodations for two, aboard the Holland America Westours, stopping at Mazatlan, Acapulco and Cabo San Lucas, is to be the evening's grand prize. Tickets are selling for $5 each or three for $10. The night of the benefit tickets will be $5 each. An "Incentive Plan" is being initiated to encourage everyone to sell opportunity tickets and ads for the benefit program. Special prizes will be awarded to the auxiliary that sells the most tickets and ads. Peggy Hemmings, ALSC President; Else Loudon, Vice President, Ways and Mear Fund Raising Goals Fall Campaign: This fall will launch our Second Matching Gifts Campaign for Land, Building and Equipment. The much needed replacement of the heating/air conditioning equipment in the Anne Banning Community House will be the goal of this campaign _ which has been generously seeded by a $25,000 grant from the McAlister Foundation and a $25,000 gift from Dr. Clifford Cherry. These gifts will spur the $150,000 campaign. Fund Raising Workshop: On September 20, 1985, the Development Committee of ALSC sponsored a Fund Raising Workshop for interested auxiliary members and service directors. The day's program offered information on fund raising and featured a group of panelists from five auxiliaries. If allowed for a valuable interchange of ideas between members. The Fund Development committee is anxious to work with auxiliaries and services in meeting the new challenge for additional funding which faces ALSC. Fabulous 500: Last year's tremendously successful Fabulous 500 Patron Appeal will be repeated again, but with added incentives. Although the primary appeal for members to this prestigious support group will occur in conjunctionjilh the All -League Benefit Patron"` l (Continued on page 2) r. r.y t 1 August 23, 1985 TO: Betty Ketron, ALSC Executive Director, 469-1973 FROM: Else Loudon, Vice President/Ways & Means, (818) 986-8368 C' BUDGET/ALL LEAGUE BENEFIT, Sunday -March 2, 1986 - Sheraton Premier Hotel Patrons Donations Underwriting 4,500.00 Contributions 10,000.00 Advertising 4,000.00 Ticket Sales: 600 @ $100. 60,000.00 Drinks/Rebate 300.00 Opportunity Prizes 6,000.00 Patrons Invitations Envelopes and Cards Thank you notes Postage 2000 x .22 Benefit Invitations Envelopes Enclosure cards Response envelopes Typesetting ? Postage 2200 x .22 �iIil�iIi •1 11 �1 11 11 11 Programs: 1,100 3.200.00 Typesetting Layout & Paste Up Printing Copies to Advertisers Envelopes & stamps Advertising: Letters 100.00 Order Forms 500 Envelopes Typesetting (we have, just change date) Postage Programs & Thank you notes 28.00 a SUGGESTED TICKET PRICE: TOTAL: $ 134,800.0C TOTAL: $ 1,500.0C TOTAL: $ 1.984AL TOTAL: -$ 3,200.09 TOTAL: $ 128.00 CD LA) iviw o a`F'D) m 0 o cum � { cn 0 0 cF 0 OD 0 N0p ' (a (p C1 � R r w cF �s' w t W ~b K w� H. h N N or 0 d ((D O N Pi 03 N (D 93brr a a0g (p N 0) NoPN.cdo d 0rnw rild curA (D 0 d � �.m� c �13 o N a snoNGQ m F h rs m cr o � o w m 0 � £OfiT6 eT=OJTTeO 's51e0 uw=9gS @AT.z(I eueTv %5 c uopnoZ meTTTTM 'saN -s-s-in ss3NISnewmazio yj.Mi• OISOZ '-Z)'a 'NOJ.9NIHSVM aJ.IVUOT Q;OJID I�r gaj!,Ujz a m 0 „m °a3 3c >M v x •C 2r,-'0 ..:day, Oefow 16, 1471=Vam Nuys taflf.i — --- T H E 77 74 Y A � t 74 b STUDENTS in German language class at Cal n School in Encino return to books as their fav- e teacher returns to classroom. From left are 1 Waldenburg 16, student; Mrs.* Else Loudon, :nan teacher; Mrs. Ruth Yardum, Cal Prep di- udenfs' favorite German Teacher Returns to Class =rman language stu- their favorite teacher is at Cal Prep School, back at the front of the ,) Ventura Blvd., En- classroom- -. nre studying con- When the school year again now that started last month, the .Wrt e our German languag "Although she 1s a ver Pict teacher, she love id understands youn ogle and they in tur students of lairs. Else Lou- Now, even with her so- adore her. Thev buck) don were disappointed to cial and club work and )town to study for her, learn that a new teacher ,her duties at the nonprofit s• Yardum said of Mr had been hired to replace p German -American School, ioudon. With ith that in mini Mrs'. Loudin, a mother Mrs. Loudon is back at Ong with the recognitio r and also the principal of her chalkboard at Cal the progress the stt }. t h e G e r man -American Prep. "I enjoy working ants has mad- in tt::. School in Van Nuys, had with young people, and .l iudies under yia. Loi found. that she did 'not think they are great," she PPn� the curriculum w-, have time to teach daily said: Dranged to fit the Ge. morning and afternoon The teacher, students a --es into the a: 'En��n classes at Cal Prep. and principal are h�ppy,at.' t Her students, however, Cal Pre now. p . were unhappy with the turn of events. They, got_, `- yrYyy'�2�._X.'�cr� � M N �t� � ' - . � �"�° � ;� 4+ '�`. ; n ' :h+ i��,, w � � n o,. r��i� �" ski 'is .�� u • .t+ y: a �r� 'If4et� s� - �� #as��a }b�'rbsr .,,•.` r�.'� �r�`.� �d�'s�Le`I� S s y a z s Ck� 7 1 Fr 03 f�P4 PQ �r a w LIJ p ,< W w 20 y ar�� Y. O Q •. 55';•t CQ e +' LL W e A � � 4 ..£ � a -•-� �. .: 7 r a s _: - .�/J,. '� rrww'll,,�--•y�y>,✓b ', +' 1 'rjXtx.,h F� t.. IC. i' 9� 9i� .+� y (Yv�+�y yYtW xp,'l.• Stt. Nt 1:,'rIr��\i•'��rr''',r 'G"j.'r E' :J s't c-".'.��" u,il'- 'F_ .,� , r •h C+^a� 4-..ti: y If w.9.+� - � ..vR�� d�•'r!d•�4. ._. ... ..;. - +-�?F�jy_ SE �w..:"wY• vy��RaS��"`"'= � �'�- `,.. .y�y�yax�S��1.` ATTACHMENT 23. Robert G. Cox 78315 Crestview Terrace La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 345-2142 December 10, 2002 Mayor and Councilmembers City of La Quinta RECEIVED 2002 DEC 10 PM 2: 20 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I am writing this letter to express my desire to fill the current vacant position of councilmember for the City of La Quinta. I believe I am highly qualified for the position and with my knowledge and experiences, would complement the current council members. My main areas of interest are those of public safety, youth issues, business prosperity and growth. Although these are my key issues, I am not limited to only these nor am I bound by any predetermined agenda. I am currently a registered voter in the City of La Quinta and have lived here since the inception of the City. I have lived in the desert for over 30 years. I have been involved in the City since the beginning as my wife served on the very first council. I learned with her, what it took to make the city viable and have tried to remain informed and involved since. I have attended as many council and planning meetings as possible and have made police and fire issues a priority. Of course, one of the main issues I have been very active in has been the effort to enhance our fire and emergency medical services. This is an issue that cannot go away. I spent over 30 years in the fire service, from volunteer firefighter to Fire Chief. I worked with various city, county and special district governments as well as state and federal government. Although I am now retired from the fire service, I am still an instructor in fire sciences as well as a consultant. I believe the education I received from those experiences gave me considerable insight into how each section operates and the importance of cooperation among them. I am also a member of the board for the Riverside County Fair and National Date Festival. We stress youth involvement and have been successful in increasing our youth activities and scholarship programs. Our youth cannot be ignored nor forgotten. My children were raised here and now my grandchildren are growing up here. I want to keep the area safe and as beneficial as possible. I also understand the importance of quality business and growth to our community. I have operated my own businesses in the area and currently work in the local mortgage banking industry. I understand how healthy business and growth are vital to our future. Not only do we need the availability of the high -end homes, but we have to address the needs of affordable housing in all income ranges for our growing family population as well as for our senior population and their needs. I realize this is a very short synopsis of my total background, but I do believe I have shown my experience, knowledge, diverse involvement and my desire to serve would be an asset to the council. I would consider it a great honor to serve and would look forward to the many challenges and the exciting times ahead. I any of you need to contact me, my numbers are home: 345-2142, cell: 413-4955, or email: rgcox@verizon.net. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely Robert G. Cox r,rY December 9, 2002 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: City Council Appointment Honorable Council Members, ATTACHMENT 24. IMCEIVED 2002 DEC-1 J1711 3= 33 CITY OF LA OUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I humbly submit my letter of interest for the fifth city council member appointment. If needed I can provide a resume outlining my personal and professional qualifications. I am a lifelong member of the Coachella Valley and attended school in the Coachella Valley Unified School District and College of the Desert. My wife Lorelei and myself have resided in La Quinta for over 10 years raising our three children Isabella, age 7, Jake, age 5 and Mikaela, age 2. My wife and I are both employed by the Coachella Valley Unified School District; Lorelei as the Project Teacher at Coachella Valley High School and I as the Director of Technology for the district. I am the Foundation Chair for the Coachella Valley Rotary Club and the President elect for 2003- 2004. I am a member of the Imperial Irrigation District's Power Commission and a member of the Coachella Valley Leadership Association. My wife Lorelei and I are both involved as PTO members at Amelia Earhart School of International Studies in La Quinta. These organizations assist communities and students with various activities and scholarships. I recently campaigned unsuccessfully for a directorship on the Coachella Valley Water District Board of Directors and although I was not victorious, I am very proud of the outcome. I have been very involved in professional organizations and activities to keep abreast of the technology industry. I have just completed my tenure as the State Technology Chair for the California Association of School Business Officials (CASBO) for which I served for 2 years. I was also the Eastern Section (CASBO) Chair for 2 years before becoming the state chair. I recently graduated from the Association of California School Administrators (ACSA) Chief Business Officials (CBO) Academy, which covers all aspects of school business. I served as an advisor for the California Department of Education TECHsets project and I currently serve as an advisor for the Riverside County ROP Technology Program. I am currently an Adjunct Faculty member at College of the Desert teaching Computer Science courses and I have been a faculty member for 7 years. I am very excited about the future of the City of La Quinta and the possibility of serving my city. I feel that the council should reflect the diversity of the city and I am eager to represent that diversity as a young Hispanic professional raising a young family. Please allow me the opportunity to serve my city and to bring a fresh new perspective to the council. Make the right choice and appointment Frank R. Ceja as the fifth member of the La Quinta City Council. Respectfully, Frank R. Ceja T4ty,, 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Continued Consideration of an Appeal of a Planning Commission Decision on a Public Nuisance Citation Regarding the Violation of Front/Side Yard Setback, Satellite Dish Location, and Construction Without a Permit at 53-750 Avenida Obregon. Appellant: Bill and Jan Turner. AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the appeal. FISCAL IMPACT: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Planning Commission discussed the issue of temporary shade structures in front yards at their July 23, 2002 meeting. After discussion, the Commission decided not to recommend a Zoning Code Amendment to permit such structures (Attachment 1). On August 8, 2002, Mr. and Mrs. Turner were cited for two Code violations, which included a shade structure in the front yard and a satellite dish in the rear yard (Attachment 2). The Sections cited in the violation are contained in Attachment 3. In accordance with Zoning Code Section 11.72.050 (Attachment 4), the Turners filed a letter (Attachment 5) appealing the citation (Public Nuisance Citation, Case No. 6559, Attachment 6) to the Planning Commission. On September 24, 2002, the Planning Commission considered the appeal and after lengthy discussion denied the appeal (Attachment 7). On October 1, 2002, Mr. and Mrs. Turner filed an Appeal of the Planning Commission Decision (Attachment 8). The City Council considered the appeal at their October 15, 2002 meeting and after extensive discussion, continued the matter for 60 days and directed staff to research potential options for modifications to the Zoning Code to allow shade structures within the required front and side yard setback areas (Attachment 9). 226 Other Shade Structures There are approximately 10 homes with temporary shade structures in the front and side yards. The majority of these homes are located in the Cove. Code Enforcement action is pending upon the outcome of this matter. Code Requirements The City's regulations establish development standards, such as setbacks and height requirements for accessory structures and buildings such as barbeques, waterfalls, fireplaces, patio covers, decks, carports, and play equipment. These accessory structures and buildings are subject to Sections 9.60.040 (Patio Covers, Attachment 10), 9.60.050 (Storage and Other Accessory Buildings, Attachment 11), or 9.60.060 (Garages and Carports, Attachment 12) of the Municipal Code. In order to maintain open space, buildings and accessory structures must maintain front and side yard requirements. Shade structures would be located within the front yard, and thus, would reduce open space. Note that certain decorative lawn structures (e.g. waterfalls, fireplaces... etc.) are allowed in the front yard. Further, Section 9.150.060 (Required Residential Parking, Attachment 13) requires two parking spaces per unit within a garage. Shade structures would facilitate the conversion of garages to storage areas or living areas. Surrounding Communities Surrounding communities have various regulations governing accessory structures, but generally speaking, cities either do not allow structures in front and side yards or require that structures comply with setback and design requirements of the main dwelling units. Temporary Structures Temporary structures are those structures allowed on a temporary basis, provided they comply with all applicable setback requirements and are not erected for more than 180 days within a 12 month period. Regulations must be established, if different than above, to specify the duration of shade structures. Also, the Code Compliance Department will need to establish a protocol to: • Identify the shade structures in the City; • Inform owners of the code requirements; • Verify that garages have not been illegally converted; and • Monitor the properties for compliance. Note that continuous ongoing monitoring activity will be required to ensure compliance. Because temporary shade structures do not require foundations, they could become projectiles during wind gusts. Temporary shade structures should obtain a permit to make certain that wind load requirements are properly addressed. 22" 002 Permanent Structures Building permits are required for permanent structures in excess of 120 square feet. These structures require structural design by a licensed architect or engineer and must comply with all applicable setback requirements. As indicated previously, shade structures should obtain a permit to make certain that wind load requirements are properly addressed. Permanent shade structures would allow parking in the driveway, which would facilitate the conversion of garages to other uses, reduce the amount of on -site parking, and increase street parking. Code Compliance Department should make certain that garages have not been converted to other uses prior to the issuance of a permit. Also, the Code Compliance Department would need to monitor properties with permanent shade structures to: Identify the shade structures in the City; Inform owners of the permit requirements; and Monitor the properties for compliance. Liquid Propane Gas (LPG) Tanks Please note that many homes in the Cove have LPG tanks that have been legally located adjacent to the interior front/side property lines. LPG tanks were approved at these locations because nothing could be built within the front and side setback areas. The Fire Code requires a minimum 10 foot setback from any on or off -site tank. Therefore, a shade structure would not be permitted in a front/side yard if a tank is located anywhere within 10', even if the tank is on an adjacent property. Likewise, a tank would not be allowed if a shade structure has been erected anywhere within 10'. Therefore, a prejudice for preexisting structures would be established and future applicants would not be able to enjoy the benefit of the code requirements. Color, size, and shape Many shade structures, especially temporary shade structures, are not architecturally consistent with dwelling units and do not utilize similar materials. As a result, most communities require that shade structures be consistent with dwelling units. In certain cases, accessory structures that are not consistent with the dwelling unit are permitted in the front of the home, but must meet certain setback requirements and/or screening requirements. Should shade structures be permitted, they should be compatible with the home's architectural style and materials. The Community Development Director should also have the discretion to review and approve these structures to ensure compatibility. To minimize their appearance, shade structures should be open on all side, if detached; if attached, structures should be open on three sides. 00Y8 Retractable shade structures Retractable shade structures may be allowed in accordance with Section 9.50.060 (Architectural Projections, Attachment 14), which permits a 2' projection into the required setback area as long as it is not closer than 3 Y2 feet from the property line. As indicated previously, a permit should be required to make certain that it is consistent with the wind load requirements. The retractable structure housing should be painted to match the home and comply with setback requirements as required by Section 9.50.060. Location Should shade structures be allowed, they should comply with all applicable setback requirements for carports (Section 9.60.060). Shade structures should be allowed over the driveway only, to prevent the tenting of the entire front yard area. Maintenance Most temporary shade structures include canvas covers that require routine maintenance. If shade structures are permitted, there should be a maintenance clause that would require the following: • Holes in the fabric that exceed 10% of the area of the entire fabric is a violation and must be repaired or replaced. • If the fabric becomes detached from the frame by more than 10% of the perimeter it is a violation and must be repaired or replaced. • All structures must remain free from graffiti, stains and burn marks and other such defects. If the combined area of said defects exceeds 5% of the total area of the fabric, it shall be considered excessive and the fabric must be repaired or replaced. • All repairs must be made with materials similar to the original installation and approved by the Director. • If the fabric is removed from the support framework and is not replaced within 15 days it shall be considered a violation and must be removed. Satellite Dish At a previous Council meeting, the applicant indicated that the Satellite Dish would be removed. As of this writing the dish remains. Other Issues There are other code compliance issues such as art in private residences that is visible from public view that must be addressed at a later time. 229 004 Summary The following matters should be considered if the Council proposes to allow temporary shade structures: • New permit requirements, including design and maintenance requirements, and approval process; • Additional code enforcement process and ongoing monitoring; • 10' setback, if adjacent to LPG tank; and • Loss of front yard open space; The following matters should be consider if the Council proposes to allow permanent shade structures: • New permit requirements, including design and maintenance requirements, and approval process; • Additional code enforcement process and ongoing monitoring; • 10' setback, if adjacent to LPG tank; • Loss of front yard open space; • Increased street parking; and • Potential garage conversions. Staff recommends the City Council maintain the current code requirements and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the appeal. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the appeal; or 2. Direct staff to draft language to modify the Zoning Code regarding shade structures; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Herm n, Community Development Director 230 005 Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Minutes for July 23, 2002 (excerpts) 2. Case file information w/ pictures 3. Code Sections regarding Garages and Carports, and Satellite Dish and Other Antennas 4. Code Section regarding Abatement of Public Nuisances 5. Letter of Appeal considered by the Planning Commission 6. Citation No. 6559 7. Planning Commission Minutes for September 24, 2002 (excerpts) 8. Letter of Appeal to be considered by the City Council 9. City Council Minutes for October 15, 2002 (excerpts) 10. Municipal Code Section 9.60.040 (Patio Covers) 11. Municipal Code Section 9.60.050 (Storage and Other Accessory Buildings) 12. Municipal Code Section 9.60.060 (Garages and Carports) 13. Municipal Code Section 9.150.060 (Parking Spaces Required) 14. Municipal Code Section 9.050.060 (Architectural Projections) 231 00011 0 ATTACHMENT #1 Planning Commission Minutes July 23, 2002 Commissioners Kirk/Abets to adopt Pla ing Commission Resolution 2002-083 recommending certif' ation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental i pact for Environmental Assessment 2002-454, subject to the endings, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners #bels and Kirk. NOES: Commissioner Robbins a Vice Chairman Tyler. ABSENT: Chairman Butler. ABS AIN: None. 48. There being a tie vote, a motion dies. No further action was taken. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: q - ; a request of Jai Nettimi for compatibility iew of a deck for a single family two story house located at 79-39r Paseo del Rey. 1 . Vice C airman Tyler asked if there was a motion to continue Site Deve pment Permit 2002-744, as requested. It was moved and sec nded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to continue Site D velopment Permit 2002-744 to September 3, 2002, as quested. Unanimously approved. B. Zoning Issues; a request of staff for review of Shade Structures, Gas -7 Stations, and Drive Thrus. 1. Vice Chairman Tyler asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Vice Chairman Tyler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioners Robbins/Kirk stated they support leaving the Zoning Code as it is written for shade structures. 3. Staff asked if the Commission wanted to limit the number of gas stations and fast thru restaurants in the City. Staff is not requesting the prohibition of a restaurants, but rather the drive thru. 232 V G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-23-02.wpd 19 IJ �3 Planning Commission Minutes July 23, 2002 4. Commissioner Kirk questioned whether or not the City could adopt such an action. Assistant City Attorney Marc Luesebrink stated the Planning Commission can amend the Zoning Code and make a recommendation that allowing these uses is not good planning. 5. Following discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to continue this to a future meeting, directing staff to prepare an analysis as to how many gas stations and drive throughs there are and where they are located in La Quinta and potential locations. Unanimously approved. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE A. Commissioners d D WRITTEN MATERIAL: IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: ussed the A. No report was given or\the City Council meeting of July 16, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it wa Abels/Robbins to adjourn this regular meets meeting of the Planning Commission to be h meeting of the Planning Commission was a Respectfully submitted, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California moved and seconded by Commissioners g of the Planning Commission to a special d September 3, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This dj urned at 10:45 p.m. on July 23, 2002. 23� G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-23-02.wpd 20 i 'Ail ki [ 0 1 00 OiMA:IUs] : i. Of ��..OPP- _ • 235 file://M:\Documents%20and%20Settings\dconrad\Local%20Settings\Temp\1\PKGB.JPG 10/2/2002 • ATTACHMENT #3 9.60.050 M C. Lot Coverage Maximums. The placement of accessory buildings on a lot shall not result in violation of the lot coverage maximums set forth in Section 9.50.030. D. Standards. Setbacks and Maximum Height. Detached accessory buildings shall conform to the following setback standards: Table 9-3 Standards for Detached Accessory Buildings Roof Area of Structure Separation (sq. ft.)Height Heighmaximum from Main Building 0-100 10 5 101-200 10 5 201+ 17 10 Minimum Setback (ft) Front Yard Interior Exterior Rear Side Yard Side Yard Yard 20 3.5 10 3.5 20 5 10 5 Same as for main building (Ord. 299 § 1 (part), 1997; Ord. 284 § 1 (F_xhs. A, B) (part), 1996) 9.60.060 Garages and carports. A. Height. The maximum structure height shall be fourteen feet for a detached carport and seventeen feet for a detached garage, except that garages may be up to twenty-eight feet in height if a second dwelling unit complying with the provisions of Section 9.60.090 is located above the garage. B. Setbacks. 1. In the RVL district, the minimum garage or carport setback shall be thirty feet. In all other residential districts, the minimum setback for front -entry type garages or carports shall be twenty-five feet if a standard `pivot" type garage door -is used, twenty feet if a 'roll -up" type garage door is used, and twenty feet for a carport For side -entry type garages, the minimum garage setback shall be twenty feet in the RVL district and fifteen feet in all other residential districts. 2. When alleys, private streets or common driveways at the rear of a lot are provided specifically as vehicular access to garages and carports and when separate access and circulation systems are provided for pedestrians, guests and emergency vehicles, garages and carports may be placed up to a minimum of five feet from such alley, private street or common driveway. C. Lot Coverage Maximums. The placement of a garage or carport on a lot shall not result in violation of the lot coverage maximums set forth in Section 9.50.030. (Ord. 284 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) 9.60.070 Swimming pools. A. Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to any outdoor swimming pool, whirlpool, spa (in -ground or above -ground), or open tank or pond containing or normally capable of containing water to a depth of eighteen inches or more at any point. For purposes of this section, the term 'pool" means all or any of the foregoing facilities. B. Standards. Pools are permitted as accessory uses in residential districts subject to the following requirements: 1. Location. Pools shall be located at least three feet (measured from water's edge) from any property line. No adjustments to this minimum shall be approved, with the exception -of private gated communities where any property line is adjacent to common open area. 2. Filter and Heating Equipment. Mechanical pool equipment, such as a pump, filter or heater, may be located. within the required front or rear yard setback areas. The equipment shall be enclosed, with the exception of a roof.. A five-foot side yard, clear of any permanent obstructions, shall be maintained between the side yard property line and the building. Pool equipment that can be accommodated in this area shall be enclosed, with the exception of a roof. The community development director shall determine if this provides effective noise and vibration attenuation. Equipment shall be screened from view from the strut when in the front yard_ In addition, equipment shall be screened from ground view of surrounding properties. Such visual screening may consist of perimeter walls or fencing (if permitted), screen walls, or landscape planting. 237 E� 3 9.60.070 3. Fencing Requirements. All pools shall be fenced in accordance with the provisions of the city's building code Chapter 8.06, state law and other applicable laws and ordinances. 140 4. Screening shall be provided as required in Section 9.60.140B(2).'(Ord. 325 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1998; Ord. 299 § 1 (part), 1997; Ord. 284 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) —. 9.60.080 Satellite dish and other antennas. A. Purpose. Satellite dish and other antennas consistent with the design and location provisions of this section shall be permitted as accessory structures within any residential district. B. Permitted Commercial Antennas. Commercial television, radio, microwave, communication towers, and related facilities are permitted as principal uses in all districts subject to approval of a conditional use permit and conformance with the requirements of Chapter 9.I70 (Communication Towers and Equipment). Satellite dish and other antennas are permitted as accessory structures in nonresidential districts in accordance with Section 9.100.070. C. Permitted Noncommercial Antennas. Noncommercial privately owned television and/or radio antennas shall be contained entirely within a building except for. (1) satellite dish antennas and other antennas which cannot function when completely enclosed by a building; and (2) amateur radio antennas used by operators licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC, pursuant to 47 CFR Section 97). Such permitted outdoor antennas shall comply with the following design standards and requirements: 1. Number. No more than one satellite dish and one amateur radio antenna shall be permitted per lot. 2. Height and Diameter. Satellite dish antennas shall not exceed eight feet in height measured from adjacent grade or finish floor and shall be no more than eight feet in diameter. Amateur radio antennas shall not exceed the maximum building height for the district as specified in Section 9.50.030. 3: Ground -Mounted Antennas. a Location. All ground -mounted antennas shall be located within the rear yard or may be located within an interior side yard if not within the required side yard setback. Such antennas are prohibited from exterior street side yards unless not visible from the street. All antennas over six feet in height shall be set back a minimum of ten feet from all property lines. b. Screening. Ground -mounted satellite dish antennas shall be screened from view, including views from adjacent yards, by landscaping or decorative structures (trellis, arbor, fence, etc.). The dish antenna shall be a single color that blends with its surroundings (e.g., off-white, dark green, brown, gray or black). c. Disguised Antennas. An antenna which has the appearance of typical backyard furniture or equipment (e.g., satellite dish antenna manufactured to have the appearance of a patio umbrella) is not required to comply with the preceding location and screening standards but shall comply with height and size limits. Such an antenna may be placed on any patio or deck. 4. Building -Mounted Antennas. Roof -top and other building -mounted antennas are prohibited in all residential districts if over twenty-four inches in diameter unless completely screened from horizuntal view via a parapet wall or other feature which is integrated into the architecture of the building. (Ord. 299 § 1 (part), 1997; Ord. 294 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) 9.60.090 Second residential units. A. Purpose. This section provides standards and criteria for the establishment of second residential units within residential districts consistent with Sections 65852.1, 65852.150, and 65852.2 of the State Government Code. B. Definitions. For purposes of thin code, the following definitions shall apply: 1. "Second residential unit" means a dwelling unit, including sleeping and cooking facilities, that is accessory to a pre-existing primary residence on a single-family lot. "Granny housing" is intended for sole occupancy by one or two persons age sixty-two years or older or a handicapped person of any age (plus spouse or care giver). "Granny housing" is included within the term "second residential unit_" 2. "Living area" means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics (if permitted) and shall not include a garage or any accessory structure. C. Limitations. Only one second residential unit or one guesthouse may be established on any lot in addition to the primary residence.. Therefore, no more than two residential units on a single lot are permitted under the -provisions of -this section._ 238 (U aui— 3-") 240 ` , 8.01.060 -- bo 8.01.060 Permits required. Section 301.1 of the Uniform Administrative Code, 1994 Edition, shall be revised to read as follows: Permits Required. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarcre. alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish any building or structure, including a swimming pool, spa or hot tub, or make any installation, alteration, repair, replacement, or remodel any building service equipment, including swimming pool, spa and hot tub equipment, regulated by this Title, except as specified in Section 301.2.1, or cause the same to be done without first obtaining a separate, appropriate permit for each building, structure or service equipment from the Building Official. (Ord. 276 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 1995; Ord. 208 § 2 (part), 1992, Ord. 114 § 1 (part), 1987; Ord. 68 § l (part). 1985) 8.01.070 Construction site security and debris. A. The owner, contractor or responsible party constructing a new building, addition, or alteration to an existing building shall maintain security measures as deemed necessary or as required by the building official to control vandalism, fires, blowing dust, sand or debris. B. The owner, contractor or responsible party constructing a new building, addition, or alteration to an existing building, shall keep the construction site clean by having on site an all metal, minimum three yard container with hinged lid (except rolloff containers), compatible for use with standard trash removal trucks. commonly referred to as dumpsters, for the depositing of trash and debris. Containers are to be provided by commercial trash collection companies and shall not be placed in the right-of-way. As used in this section. "trash and debris" shall include papers, cartons, bottles, cans, garbage, roofing materials, insulation, plaster. concrete, boards and other substances that may be accumulated as a result of construction activities. C. A trash container shall remain on the construction site until the building inspector has completed the final inspection. Said container shall be emptied of its contents on a regular schedule or as ordered by the building inspector in order to avoid blowing debris or other public nuisances. D. Disposal shall be by transportation to a legally established dump site by the city's refuse contractor or other person authorized by law to remove any container from the location where the container was placed by the person in charge for storage and collection. E. Refusal to comply with the provisions of this section shall be a misdemeanor and punishable as stipulated in Section 205 of the Uniform Administrative Code; and/or be sufficient cause for the revocation of the issued building permit pending compliance. (Ord. 208 § 2 (part), 1992; Ord. 130 § 1, 1988; Ord. 97 § 1, 1986: Ord. 68 § 1 (part), 1985) 8.01.080 Violation —Penalty. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip or cause or permit the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of this title. Any person, firm or corporation violating, or failing to comply with, any of the provisions of this title or a code adopted in this title is guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this title or such code is committed. continued or permitted, and upon conviction of any such violation, such person shall be punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. The application of the penalty provided in this section shall not be held to prevent the abatement of prohibited conditions as a public nuisance as provided by Section 1.01.250 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. (Ord. 68 § 3, 1985) -239 r 167 (La Quinta 9-99) ATTACHMENT #4 11.72.050 ing imminent danger to life or serious injury to persons or property, an authorized representative of the city may order without notice or judicial action the immediate abatement of the public nuisance. F. Appeal Procedure. Within ten days from the date of personal service or mailing the notice of public nuisance the property owner may appeal the determination that a public nuisance exists to the planning commission. The appeal shall be in writing and filed with the city clerk. At a regular meeting not more than thirty days thereafter the planning commission shall proceed to hear and pass upon the appeal. The planning commission's decision may be appealed within ten days of the decision by written request to the city clerk. The city council shall hear the appeal at a regular meeting not more than thirty days from the date of request. G. Failure to Abate. If a public nuisance is not voluntarily abated after notification the following shall apply: 1. Prosecution. Failure to abate shall constitute an infraction pursuant to Section 1.01.200 of this code which provides for prosecution as misdemeanor upon committing three infractions. 2. City to Abate. The city may cause the public nuisance to be abated. The manner of abatement and costs incurred by the city to abate the public nuisance shall be reported to the city council by the community safety director immediately following abatement. 3. Judicial Action. The city may commence a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction to cause abatement of the public nuisance. Reasonable attorney's fees and costs may be collected by the city in any action to abate a public nuisance. (Ord 160 § 1 (part), 1989) 11.72.060 Costs of abatement. A. Responsibility for Costs. If the city abates a public nuisance pursuant to Sections 11.72.050(B)(2) or 11.72.050(E) the cost of abatement may be assessed as alien against the property together with an additional twenty-five percent of the cost of abatement for inspection and any administrative and incidental costs incurred by the city to abate the public nuisance. B. Hearing on Assessment. To determine if the cost of abatement shall be assessed as a lien against the property a hearing shall be held by the city council. The city clerk shall schedule the hearing for the first regular meeting that is held at least seven days following the filing of the community safety director's report on the costs and manner of abating the public nuisance pursuant to Section 11.72.080(B). The property owner shall be served notice advising him of the date, time and location of the hearing in accordance with Section 11.72.070(C) of this chapter. A property owner may pay the assessment to the city clerk prior to the hearing to avoid a lien being placed against the property. The city council shall consider any objections to the assessment at the hearing. If the city council determines that the cost of abatement shall be assessed as a lien against the property a resolution shall be adopted by the city council stating the amount of the assessment. The city clerk shall prepare and file a certified copy of the resolution with the county auditor -controller. C. Assessment and Collection. Government Code Section 387735 is incorporated by reference as it currently exists and may be subsequently amended. Section 38773.5 provides that the assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary municipal taxes are collected. If payment is delinquent the assessment shall be subject to the same penalties and procedure and sale as provided for ordinary municipal taxes. (Ord. 160 § 1 (part), 1989) 240 427 (La QWntu 10-91) August 27, 2002 N ATTACHMENT #5 Attn: City Clerk City of La Quinta Planning Commission 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Ca 92253 RE: Letter of Appeal — Complaint #6559 "NOTICE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE" To Whom It May Concern: Please consider this letter of appeal for the citation issued on our canopy. My husband and I have stopped any further improvements to our property until this has been resolved. We are disappointed and confused with the term "public nuisance" itself since the shade has so many benefits and absolutely no negatives. Neighbors are even stopping to compliment us on it. The temperatures in our garage were over 114A but since the canopy was in place the temp is less than mid 90^s. Our money was invested and, more importantly, our time to obtain a better shade and protection for our vehicles. Some shades seen in the cove are not the quality nor have the longevity we needed. Our decision was greatly influenced by canopies used in the La Quinta Park, pool, bike trails and La Quinta Car Wash. Clear sight was taken into consideration since we are on a corner lot. This impressive canopy is not permanent but sturdy and anchored for safety however is not attached to our house. It has no abstract colors or markings even though I understand the City considers the extreme "high profile" house colors are freedom of expression. The color of blue was chosen to match as closely as possible to the trim of our house (white w/ blue trim). We simply wanted to find an attractive way to have shade for our vehicles and perhaps even discourage unwelcome vandals/ thieves. (My car has been vandalized twice in three weeks. The first time the officer said nothing could be done and he filed no report!) The Sun Bus comes down our street so the shade protects the privacy of our vehicles and their contents. We plan to park all of our vehicles in the driveway, under the shade and off of the street. Our neighbors are in complete support and we contacted them before purchasing the canopy. Their signatures are attached. After living in La Quinta for over twelve years, I am disappointed to find we have lost more freedoms to additional property easements and even more again for another 20 feet of setbacks. I heard stories of restricted colors for houses and limits on number of trees in front yards. This stirs my concern since it seems I no longer actually own any of my so- called property and I am sure this info will trigger the concerns of many other cove residents. My house (2100sf) is on a corner lot of less than 6400sf with two sides requiring 12 ft easements and the 20ft setbacks (these easements and setbacks have changed substantially since my purchase in 1991). The side yard easement of 4.5ft (should be 5ft?) and the rear of loft, I have nothing left. This may be true of most single La Quinta cove lots although easements vary by the street you live on!! All cove lots seem smaller than the minimum of 7200sf as listed in the codes so property taxes are being paid on property they cannot utilize and enjoy. It seems hard to believe these changes were made without realizing the impact on the cove residents. is it possible to consider the cove being "grand -fathered in", were we overlooked at the time or simply not even considered? 241. �7 G ,_ Page 2 of 4 As for the satellite dish, it is very surprising to hear any concern over something that has been in the same place since 1992. It was acceptable to the building inspector when our remodel was in progress so the eave has been built around the satellite pole. We moved to La Quinta in 1990 from Texas. We visited many of the Coachella Valley cities but were constantly pulled back to La Quinta. We liked the individuality concept and mixture of people of La Quinta Cove. It was a conscious decision to buy out of the gated communities and away from the homeowner associations. Our primary expectations are that we remain in control of some our freedoms and know our property should be one of them. My husband and I did not want nor expect a battle with the City of La Quinta over this beautiful canopy or satellite dish. Our understanding of earlier codes was that the canopy could not be attached permanently to the house and could not infringe on the easements or obstruct traffic visibility at the corner. The plan and desire was to enhance our home, not devaluate it so please know that we will continue the grounds improvement and check the code restrictions for any future work after this citation has been resolved. We would like to appeal the City of La Quinta's decision and respectfully request to be allowed to keep the canopy and satellite as is. Per the code inspector, Don Whelchel, the easements are for future sidewalks or utility needs so we offer to move/reposition the canopy at our expense should any sidewalks or utility needs ever become a reality. Our desire is to resolve this matter as quickly and calmly as possible. Please contact us should you have any questions and we are anxiously waiting your decision. Yours truly, Bill Turner & Jan Turner 53-750 Avenida Obregon La Quinta, Ca 92253 Bill's office# 760.564.6686 Jan's cell# 760.250.9056 Fx# 760.771.4746 242 o 3 •• ft Page 3 of 4 PETITION Keep Shade Cover & Satellite Dish (Newly Installed) (In place 11 years) Located @_3-750 Avenida Obregon 4 jxx j -13(QD 243 15s 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. nC M 244 • 0 ATTACHMENT #6 NOTICE OF CODE VIOLATIONb CASE NUMBER: 6559 PUBLIC NUISANCES Code Violation: 8.01.060-Permit required Location: Carport structure constructed over the driveway area. Violation Text: It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, convert or demolish any building or structure, including a swimming pool, spa or hot tub, or make any installation, alteration, repair, replacement, or remodel any building service equipment, including swimming pool, spa and hot tub equipment, regulated by this Title, except as specified in section 301.2.1, or cause the same to be done without first obtaining a separate, appropriate permit for each building, structure or service equipment from the Building Official, Correction: Remove the carport structure Reinspection Date: September 3`d, 2002 Code Violation: 9.60.050 Table 9-3 Standards for detached accessory buildings. (Setback requirements). Location: Carport structure constructed over the driveway area Violation Text: Table 9-3 See Attached Correction: Remove the carport structure. Reinspection Date: September 3`d„ 2002 Code Violation: 9.60.080 Satellite Dish and other Antennas Location: South East Corner of the rear yard Violation Text: See Attached Correction: Remove the Satellite Dish or conform to the specific Code Requirements. Reinspection Date: September 3`d, 2002 21ow 1 � 0 #7 ATTACHMENT Planning Commission Minutes September 24, 2002 24. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abels to continue the project /illage 8, 2002, asking the applicant to better clarify the Sto know what is being approved, show additional amen into the site plan, improved pedestrian access to tnd shows the location of the perimeter walls. Unanimoed. Chairman Butler recessed the meeting the meeting at 8:44 p.m. ;did reconvened at 8:50 p.m. / C. Zoning Code Amendment/blic 73; a r uest of the City for consideration of an amendChapte 9.60, Section 9.60.030- Fences and Walls, of the Launi pal Code, to permit split rail fencing in the front yard witnt' I zones. 1. Chairman Butler openblic hearing and asked for the staff report. Community Dnt Director Jerry Herman presented the information contaistaff report, a copy of which is on file in the Communityment Department. 2. There being Fened stions of staff and no other public comment, Chairman Bosed the public participation portion of the hearing and the matter up for Commission discussion. 3. There b ng no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Comm sioners Tyler/Abets to adopt Planning Commission Res ution 2002-095 recommending approval of Zoning Code A endment 2002-073, as recommended. ROLVCALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Butler. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: -,,A. Notice of Public Nuisance Citation #6559 a request of Bill and Jan Turner for an appeal of a Public Nuisance Citation regarding the violation of front/side yard setback, satellite dish location, and construction without a permit. 1. Chairman Butler asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Z 1 IS Community Development Department. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\9-24-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes September 24, 2002 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins stated the report submitted by Code Compliance shows a multitude of canopies/structures, and asked if other residents had received citations. Staff stated they will be cited depending on the outcome of this meeting. 3. Commissioner Tyler noted there were three portions to the citation. Staff stated that was correct. 4. Commissioner Robbins asked if this type of structure were located in the sideyard, or back yard, and a vehicle be allowed to drive back and park under it: would a building permit be allowed. Community Safety Manager John Hardcastle stated the Building Code calls out the square footage for when a permit is allowed. It depends on the amount of area under the canopy to determine if a permit would required. 5. Commissioner Abels stated it is important to keep in mind the look of the streetscape. 6. Commissioner Kirk stated that if this is an illegal structure, you cannot have a building permit. Staff stated that it is not a buildable structure because of the setback. Community Development Director Jerry Herman recited the Code requirements for shade structures. 7. Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. and Mrs. Bill Turner, 53-750 Avenida Obregon, stated the purpose of putting up the shade structure. They did drive up and down the Cove before determining what type of canopy to purchase and to see what had been allowed. They chose the one currently installed as it was a much sturdier one than what they had seen in the Cove. They have addressed the company they bought the shade structure from and they have corrected their information. They have a corner lot and do not have any options due to the setbacks, to provide shade for their driveway. They are trying to enhance the landscaping as well. It is not a permanent structure and is not attached to their home. 8. Commissioner Abels asked if the company they purchased it from informed them as to whether or not these structures were 2 ,� allowed. Ms. Turner stated no. American Awning was informF�' 11 and they have put all future sales on hold. &; 3 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\9-24-02.wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes September 24, 2002 9. Commissioner Tyler asked when the house was built. Ms. Turner stated 1990. Commissioner Tyler asked if the size of the garage is the same now. Staff stated yes; 20 feet by 20 feet. Commissioner Tyler asked why they did not park in the garage. Ms. Turner stated they have motorcycles and other vehicles in the garage. In regard to the satellite dish, they can remove it, but it can only be seen when looking down the sideyard. 10. Commissioner Robbins stated he commends them on installing a nice looking awning in comparison to some of the others shown in the examples submitted. He is concerned that the retail stores are not informing the public where they can and cannot be installed. 11. Commissioner Kirk stated he too is concerned as to how you approve one and not the others. He asked staff how they make a determination as to what meets the Code and what can create trouble for staff. Staff stated it becomes subjective and it is not their desire to be treating people unequal. 12. Commissioner Robbins asked why this structure was the only one given a citation. Staff noted this was not the first one, this is the first that appealed the citation. 13. Commissioner Kirk stated the Cove does have some special circumstances in regard to the size of the lots. Some specific requirements could be placed on the shade structures to permit their use. He would support flexibility in the Ordinance to allow them. 14. Chairman Butler stated this is a nice installation, but he does not want to approve them as it could open the door for it to be allowed anywhere. 15. Commissioner Tyler stated the City does recognize their are special circumstances with the Cove lots. He does have a problem supporting them as it will allow all types and styles that could be unattractive. 16. Commissioner Abels stated the streetscape is important and unfortunately the applicants have been taken advantage of. 24S G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\9-24-02.wpd 10 A Planning Commission Minutes September 24, 2002 17. There being no further discussion, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion of the meeting and opened the meeting for Commission discussion. 18. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Abels to adopt Minute Motion 2002-015, denying appeal of Public Nuisance Citation #6559, as recommended. Motion carried with Commissioner Kirk opposed. PONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: ISSIONER ITEMS: report of the September 17, 2002, City Council meeting, was given. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no furt6qr Abels/Tyler to adjourn meeting of the Planning meeting of the Planning 2002. Respectfully submitted, business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners its regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular 1. mmission to be held October 8, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This Cdi,nmission was adjourned at 9:39 p.m. on September 24, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 2�9 P r r- li !._ a G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\9-24-02.wpd 11 • September 29, 2002 so N ATTACHMENT #8 RECEivtu Attn: City Clerk - SEP 3 i - � IC S' `Y City of La Quinta City Council CITY 3� L,. GUI?dTA 78-495 Calle Tampico CITY C L F'; :; ' S OFFICE La Quinta, Ca 92253 RE: LETTER OF APPEAL — Complaint #6559 "Notice of Public Nuisance" To Whom It May Concern: This is to appeal the citation issued on our canopy and ask that you also read our letter of appeal submitted to the Planning Commission along with the signatures of all of our neighbors. We may repeat ourselves in some cases but we are very passionate on this issue. We have stopped any further improvements to our property until this can been resolved and are disappointed and confused with the term "public nuisance" itself since the shade has so many benefits and absolutely no negatives. We have presented our position to the Planning Commission and they were not in agreement so we now come to you. There were comments made in reference to our shade that are in bad taste and are unfair. Someone said they do not want a "tent city"! Another referred to a "coat of many colors" impact because someone else may want a canopy in pink or some other color. I strongly suggest that each of you take the time to drive up each of the streets in the cove area to realize the eclectic make-up of this area. Color is definitely something no one has discouraged from hot pink to a mixture of green/purple/yellow by looking at the homes that have been painted in the last 3 years! My husband and I simply wanted to shade the vehicles that did not fit into the garage. We are like many families in the cove area. As a family grows, there are commonly more than two vehicles and in this case we are attempting to protect the ones in the driveway. I understand the easement needs for sidewalks (even though 12 feet seems excessive). An additional 20 feet of setback is indeed extreme. Combining the 12 feet with the 20 feet on my corner lot, you find yourself at the walls of my home. When this setback requirement was decided on, it seems impossible that the RC area was taken into consideration. The small lots in the cove area have automatic limitations and it seems confusing when we are told we cannot erect any shade within the 20 feet but a home can have the permanent structure of a wall and/or pool. Our position has been explained in the letter of appeal to the Planning Commission also. The Planning Commission was polite while listening but some had little understanding of the issue other than their desire to have a cookie cutter appearance in the cove. I would like to offer the same as before in reference to our shade. We offer to move/ reposition the canopy at our expense should any sidewalks or utility needs ever become a reality. Under no circumstances were we attempting to confront the City of La Quinta or its desire to protect property values. As for the satellite dish, we were surprised to be cited for this because it has been in place since 1992. Why weren't we told before so we could have made decisions when we remodeled our home? Now the pole itself is part of our eave on the home. At this time we are looking for a way to remove this dish but have not found an acceptable answer as yet. 230 • Page 2 of2 Please know, as we said in our earlier appeal letter, my husband and I did not want nor expect a battle with the City of La Quinta over this beautiful canopy. I was told at the Planning Commission Appeal that other citations have been issued but I question this because if this is true, why were so many still up? There is only a 21 day period within which you have to comply. If we are indeed the "example", then all cited should be notified of the appeal and its progress. Now I am hearing that the code office is issuing citations to everyone since I began my response. That was not our desire to send the code officers after those who had canopies. How long were the others allowed to remain up? We chose to purchase in the La Quinta Cove because of the individuality of its residents. We have no interest in the gated community approach of matching homes and yards. It is important to us to retain some of the freedoms in our lives and we believe the property we pay taxes on each year should be one of them. Obviously, any upgrades done to our home involve respect of our neighbors and everyone's property values. We have seen many changes within the cove area and some with delight; however, others give us a reason to question. As we stated before, our desire is to resolve this matter as quickly and calmly as possible. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us as we are anxiously awaiting your decision now. Yours truly, Bill Jan Turner 53-750 Avenida Obreg 22,/ La Quinta, Ca 92253 Bill's Office# 760.202.0204 Jan's Cell# 760.250.9056 Fax# 760.202.0021 251 } ATTACHMENT #9 City Council Minutes 5 October 15, 2002 3. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON VIOLATION OF FRONT/SIDE YARD SETBACK, SATELLITE DISH LOCATION, AND CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT A PERMIT AT 53-750 AVENIDA OBREGON. APPELLANT: BILL AND JAN TURNER. Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pena, Building & Safety Director Hartung confirmed the shade structure encroaches into the right-of-way approximately one foot. Council Member Adolph asked about the permit requirements. Mr. Hartung advised any structure over 120 sq. ft. of roof area must have a permit but a permit was not issued for this structure, nor would it have been approved because of the setback violations. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Hartung advised shade structures are permitted if out of the setback area. A number of residents have been notified about the shade structures on their properties in the Cove but citations are on hold pending Council's action on this item. He confirmed the City has similar shade structures along the Bear Creek Bike Path and at the Fritz Burns Park. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Hartung stated, typically, the front of the garage is constructed on -.the setback line. Jan & William Turner explained they didn't realize a permit was required to install a canopy to shade their vehicles. The shade is needed because their vehicles are too tall to fit into their garage. Mrs. Turner commented on the need for shade structures to provide shade for vehicles and the number of such structures throughout the Cove. The setback requirement prohibits her from putting up any type of shade structure for her vehicles because she is located on a corner. She was unable to get information from the City on similar violations. Mr. Turner stated the shade structure is bolted to the ground for safety reasons. He questioned the structure being classified as a public nuisance and noted it's not a $29.95 canopy. In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Turner stated he wouldn't have a problem with his neighbor installing a $29.95 canopy if it's needed for shade. Mrs. Turner stated they are looking for alternative suggestions to provide shade for their vehicles. 252 r City Council Minutes 6 October 15, 2002 Mayor Pena asked if City standards would allow the garage door to be raised to accommodate their vehicles, to which Mr. Hartung responded "yes." Mrs. Turner stated they were not aware of the 12-foot easement for a sidewalk and that they would be willing to move the shade structure should the City decide to install a sidewalk. Council Member Henderson stated she didn't recall sidewalks being planned on the Cove interior streets. Mr. Hartung stated the easement is City property and no structures are allowed within that area. In response to Council Member Henderson, he stated he would research the Code to find out if retractable awnings are allowed. Council Member Sniff stated he feels the need for shade structures is prevalent in the area and supports staff looking at the use of retractable awnings or other alternatives. He did not feel the Turner's shade structure is totally unattractive and would like to find a reasonable and logical solution to the matter. Council Member Adolph agreed the Turner's structure is tasteful but noted some of the other awnings are not. As for retractable awnings, he commented on the need for automatic wind sensors to avoid them being ripped off by the wind. Mrs. Turner stated she would like to have her needs addressed without taking away from someone else or reducing property values. Mr. Turner stated they installed the awning to upgrade their property and can reduce the height of the structure. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Hartung stated the shade structure is also approximately one foot into the side yard setback. Council Member Perkins agreed the Turner's canopy looks nice but felt it's hard to know how to draw the line and define what looks "nice." City Attorney Jenson pointed out the Council does not have the discretion to approve a structure in the 25-foot setback area but can continue the appeal if they wish to consider amending the Municipal Code. Council Member Sniff suggested continuing the appeal and directing staff to research potential modifications to the Code. Mayor Pena stated regulations are set to keep property values at a reasonable level and it's an ongoing battle to enforce them. He felt garages should be used 253 City Council Minutes 7 October 15, 2002 for vehicles and not as a storage area. He felt opening the door to allow shade structures would become a problem because of the difficulty in controlling them. He noted not everyone can afford "nice" shade structures but may cry that they need shade too. He was sympathetic to the Turner's need but didn't want to deviate from current standards. Council Member Henderson wished to have staff take a look at the gazebos and umbrella -like structures in the Cove that may be in the setback area. In response to Mayor Pena, Mrs. Turner stated they will remove the satellite dish. MOTION - It was moved by Council Member Sniff to continue the appeal until a report is received back from staff. Motion failed due to lack of a second. Council Member Henderson stated she felt the issue should be dealt with and that the appeal should have an opportunity to wait until a determination is made on the entire issue. Council Member Adolph stated he understood her concern but noted there is a setback violation involved. Council Member Sniff stated he didn't feel the Turners should be compelled to remove their structure if possible modifications to the Code are going to be considered. Council Member Perkins suggested continuing the appeal for 60 days while staff looks into options for changing the ordinance. 0 MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to continue the appeal by Bill and Jan Turner for 60 days. Motion carried with Mayor Pena voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2002-215. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to direct staff to research potential options for providing shade structures in the setback area for possible modifications to the ordinance. Council Member Henderson stated she wouldn't support any structures within the right-of-way, and that what may be acceptable to her would be flat and well-defined awnings that are bolted down. Mr. Hartung advised the structures have to be engineered to fall within the Building Code. 254 3 • 0 City Council Minutes 8 October 15, 2002 Mr. Herman asked if Council wished for staff to look at temporary or permanent structures, to which Council Member Sniff responded "both." Council Member Perkins voiced concern about changing the Code to accommodate a situation which might result in a ripple effect through the community. Council Member Adolph commented on a cantilevered, non -retractable awning that he saw installed that the manufacturer claims will withstand 80 mph winds. Mayor Pena stated he doesn't want anything approved that is not structurally sound. He was concerned about opening up a "can of worms" and lessening City standards. Council Member Henderson suggested the Turners not make costly modifications to their structure until the Council decides whether or not to modify the Code. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2002-216. 4. CONSIDERA ON OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60, SECTION 2.60.020 (DE NATED EMPLOYEES - DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES) OF THE LA QUINTA CHA TER AND MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO "CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE." There were no changes t�'the staff report as submitted and on file in the City Clerk's Office. , MOTION - It was moved by Codlycil Members Sniff/Adolph to take up Ordinance No. 377 by title and number only, and waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 377 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL\,OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 A5ECTION 2.60.020 OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODEAELATING TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to introduc Ordinance No. 377 on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote: 255 ATTACHMENT #10 9.60.030 4. Material Combinations. Combinations of two or more of the preceding materials may be used provided that the bottom one-half of the fence is constructed of a masonry material. Combinations incorporating wood materials shall only be used for the rear and interior side yards and only when not visible from the street. F. Fence Landscaping and Maintenance. 1. Landscaping. The area between the back of curb and any fencing shall be landscaped, have a suitable permanent irrigation system, and be continuously maintained by the property owner. 2. Maintenance. All walls and fences shall be continuously maintained in good repair. The property owner shall be provided thirty days after receiving notice from the city to repair a wall or fence. The building official may grant an extension to such time period not to exceed sixty days. G. Prohibited Fence Materials and Construction Fences. The use of barbed wire, razor wire, chain link, or similar materials in or on fences is prohibited in all residential districts. Chain link fencing is permitted for temporary construction fences when authorized by a minor use permit issued in accordance with Section 9.210.020. Said minor use permit shall not be approved until a permit for grading, or construction, has been filed for, whichever comes first. H. Equestrian Fencing. Notwithstanding any other requirements of this section, fencing shall be regulated by the provisions of Section 9.140.060 (Equestrian overlay regulations) where the keeping of horses is permitted. 1. Nonconforming Fences. Any fence which does not meet the standards of this section but which was legally established prior to the adoption of these standards may be maintained provided such fence is not expanded nor its nonconformance with these standards otherwise increased. Any fence which is destroyed or damaged to the extent of more than fifty percent of its total replacement value shall not be repaired, rebuilt, or reconstructed except in conformance with these standards. (Ord. 361 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2001; Ord. 325 § I (Exh. A) (part), 1998; Ord. 299 § 1 (part), 1997; Ord. 284 § 1 (Exhs. A, B) (part), 1996) 9.60.040 Patio covers, decks and play equipment. A. Applicability. For purposes of this section, the term "patio covers, decks, and play equipment" includes any type of yard structure other than a building or a carport. Such structures include but are not limited to open • and solid patio covers, gazebos, trellises, arbors, and to play equipment which is more than eight feet in height. All such structures shall be "open" (no side walls) and are referred to in this section as "yard structures." Enclosed structures shall be considered accessory buildings (see Section 9.60.050). Uncovered decks and other structures less than eighteen inches above finish grade shall not be subject to the provisions of this section. B. Standards. Patio covers, decks, gazebos, play equipment or other yard structures, attached to or detached from the main building shall comply with front and side yard setbacks for the main building and the following requirements: 1. The location of decks shall be governed by the standards for wall projections in Section 9.50.060. 2. No yard structure shall be more than twelve feet in height. 3. Yard structures shall not be constructed or established in the panhandle portion of a panhandle or flag lot. 4. No yard structure shall be located less than five feet from any adjacent residential lot or from any rear property line adjacent to a public or private right-of-way. 5. No yard structure shall be located less than three feet from any rear properly line adjacent to any common use easement or open space or recreational area which is at least ten feet deep. 6. Eaves or roofs may overhang into the required setback a maximum of eighteen inches. Setbacks shall be measured from the nearest supporting member of the structure to the property line or, if the property line is at the toe of a slope, from the top of the slope. 7. Structures shall be constructed in a manner so as to prevent rooftop water from draining onto any adjacent parcel. 8. Wood lattice cross -members in patio covers or trellises shall be of minimum nominal two inches by two inches material. 9. No patio cover, trellis, gazebo, arbor, similar structure, or combination thereof shall cover more than fifty percent of the rear area required setback. (Ord. 325 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1998; Ord. 299 § I (part), 1997; Ord. 284 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) • 237 02 (La Quinn 3-r w ATTACHMENT #11 9.60.045 9.60.045 Barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces and similar structures. A. Applicability. Permanently installed freestanding barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces and similar • structures such as permanently installed tables and benches, etc., may be constructed on a residential lot containing a primary residence. B. Standards. Freestanding barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces and similar structures shall comply with the following requirements: 1. Said construction of structures, except freestanding fireplaces, are allowed within the required front, side, or rear setbacks, including adjacent to a property line. In side yard areas, a single clear passageway of five feet wide shall be provided. 2. Allowed construction of structures shall not be attached to property line walls or fences, and shall meet all required distance clearances (i.e., for barbeques, fireplaces). 3. Within five feet of any property line, the height of the feature or construction shall not exceed the height of the closest wall or fence. If no wall or fence exists, the construction or feature shall not exceed the height of the wall allowed along the property line in question. 4. Outdoor fireplaces shall not be closer than five feet from a property line, except when adjacent to permanent open space such as a golf course, common landscape or hardscape area, drainage channel, etc., in which case it may be within three feet of the property line. The height of the chimney may be up to six feet unless required to be higher to comply with building code requirements. In such cases, the height shall not be higher than the minimum height required. 9.60.050 Storage and other accessory buildings. A. Applicability. Accessory buildings, such as storage or gardening sheds, are permitted on a residential lot containing a primary residence subject to the requirements of this section. (Carports and garages are regulated separately by Section 9.60.060, patio covers by Section 9.60.040, swimming pools and spas by Section 9.60.070, and recreational vehicle parking by Section 9.60.130.) B. Drainage from Roofs. Accessory buildings shall be constructed in a manner so as to prevent rooftop water from draining onto any adjacent parcel. • C. Lot Coverage Maximums. The placement of accessory buildings on a lot shall not result in violation of • the lot coverage maximums set forth in Section 9.50.030. D. Standards. Setbacks and Maximum Height. Detached accessory buildings shall conform to the following setback standards: Table 9-3 Standards for Detached Accessory Buildings Minimum Setback (ft.) Roof Area of Separation Structure Maximum from Main Front Yard Interior Exterior Rear (sq. ft.) Height Building Side Yard Side Yard Yard 0-100 10 5 20 3.5 10 3.5 101-200 10 5 20 5 10 5 201+ 17 10 Same as for main building (Ord. 299 § 1 (part), 1997; Ord. 284 § I (Exhs. A, B) (part), 1996) 2r7 ATTACHMENT #12 9.60.060 Garages and carports. A. Height. The maximum structure height shall be fourteen feet for a detached carport and seventeen feet for a detached garage, except that garages may be up to twenty-eight feet in height if a second dwelling unit complying with the provisions of Section 9.60.090 is located above the garage. B. Setbacks. 1. In the RVL district, the minimum garage or carport setback shall be thirty feet. In all other residential districts, the minimum setback for front -entry type garages or carports shall be twenty-five feet if a standard 46 "pivot" type garage door is used, twenty feet if a "roll -up" type garage door is used, and twenty feet for a carport. For side -entry type garages, the minimum garage setback shall be twenty feet in the RVL district and fifteen feet in all other residential districts. 2. When alleys, private streets or common driveways at the rear of a lot are provided specifically as vehicular access to garages and carports and when separate access and circulation systems are provided for pedestrians, guests and emergency vehicles, garages and carports may be placed up to a minimum of five feet from such alley, private street or common driveway. C. Lot Coverage Maximums. The placement of a garage or carport on a lot shall not result in violation of the lot coverage maximums set forth in Section 9.50.030. (Ord. 284 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) 2,58 A ATTACHMENT #13 9.150.050 • �11 E. Certification of Required Parking. Numerical parking space requirements shall be determined and/or amended through approval of a parking plot plan pursuant to Section 9.150.020. The numerical requirements shall be deemed certified upon such approval. (Ord. 284 § I (Exh. A) (part), 1996) 9.150.060 Spaces required by use. A. Land Uses not Listed. If no provisions for the required number of off-street parking spaces are set forth in Tables 9-1 1 or 9-12 of this section or the provisions are not clear for a specific use, the decision -making authority for the applicable use or project shall determine the number of parking spaces required. B. Definition of GFA. For purposes of this chapter and this code, "gross floor area" or "GFA" means the total square footage of all floors of a building, including the exterior walls but excluding courtyards and other outdoor areas. C. Parking for Residential Land Uses. 1. Table 9-11 following contains the minimum number of parking spaces required for each type of residential land use. 2. Whenever any commercial or industrial use is located on a building site that is also used for residential purposes, parking facilities shall be provided for the residential use per Table 9-11 in addition to the spaces required for the nonresidential use(s). Table 9-11 Parking for Residential Land Uses Minimum Off -Street Parking Land Use Requirement Additional Requirements Single-family detached, single- 2 spaces per unit in a garage plus A bedroom means any habitable family attached and duplexes. .5 guest spaces per unit if no on- room that may be used for street parking is available sleeping purposes other than a kitchen, bathroom, hallway, dining room, or living room. Minimum driveway length shall conform to Section 9.60.060. Above homes with four or more Same as above but with 3 spaces Same as above bedrooms per unit in a garage. For additions raising total number of bedrooms to 4 or more, third garage space is not required provided addition does not increase value of house by 50% or more as determined by director of building and safety. Existing lots of 6,000 square feet or less and affordable housing, this requirement is optional. Employee quarters One covered or uncovered space. This space shall not be tandem. Townhomes 2 spaces per unit in a garage plus All units shall be within 100 feet o .8 guest spaces per unit the nearest guest space. A parking plan will be required as part o development review showing allocation of guest spaces. All guest spaces shall be restricted to the use of guests only 323 (La Quinta 3-02 ) ATTACHMENT #14 9.50.050 950.050 Maximum building height. For purposes of this code, the maximum height of buildings and other structures shall be defined as the verticaldistance from finish grade to an imaginary plane above the building site. The imaginary plane shall be established above and parallel to the finish grade adjacent to the exterior walls at a vertical distance equal to the specified maximum height. This definition. is illustrated below: STRUCTURE wn WT PEME IWT IiVA A , PLAW r' now r� UM Figure 9-5: Measurement of Building Height (Ord. 284 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) 950.060 Architectural projections. A. Roof Projections. Notwithstanding Figure 9-5, chimneys, roof vents, finials, spires, and similar architectural features not containing usable space are permitted to extend up to three feet above the maximum structure height set forth in Table 9-2 preceding. B. Projections. The following architectural projections are pennitted to encroach into the required setbacks specified in Table '9-2 preceding: 1. Roof overhangs, chimneys, awnings and canopies may encroach a maximum of two feet into uny required setback provided such projections are no closer than three and one-half feet from any property line. 2. Cantilevered seating windows or ledges, which are located a minimum of one foot above the floor and do not increase a building's. usable floor area, may encroach a maximum of two feet into any required setback provided such projections are no closer than three and one-half feet from any, property line. 3. Balconies, exterior stairways, and elevated uncovered decks may encroach a maximum of four feet into required front and rear setbacks provided such projections are no closer than three and one-half feet from any property 1`me. Such projections shall not encroach into required side setbacks nor. increase a building's usable floor space. (Ord. 325 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1998: Ord. 299 § 1 (part), 1997; Ord. 284 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) 950.070 Irregular lots. A. Purpose. Setback distances established for residential districts are based on rectangular lots. Nonrectanguiar lots, lots with three sides or- more than four sides, and other nonstandard lots require special measurement techniques in order to achieve the purpose of setback requirements, i.e., the appropriate separation of structures Im streets and other properties. The purpose of this subsection is to provide standards for the establishment d measurement of setbacks on irregular lots. (See Chapter 9.280 for definition of lot lines.) 0. W"i OA Quit" 3-99) 230 �z.0 Tit!t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of an Appointment of Two City Council Members to Serve on the Plein Air Art Purchase PUBLIC HEARING: Committee RECOMMENDATION: Appoint two City Council Members to serve on the Plein Air Art Purchase Committee to select art during the La Quinta Arts Foundation Plein Air event; if deemed appropriate request two Cultural Arts Commissioners participate on the Committee; choose an option for selecting an art piece, and authorize an expenditure of up to $2,500 from Account # 101-101-703-899. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The sum of $7,500 has been budgeted in the Civic Center Art Purchase Account #101-101-703-899. At the November 19, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council authorized an expenditure not to exceed $2,500 from Account #101-101-703- 899 for an art piece from the Plein Air event. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Since 1989, the City has been selecting artwork from the La Quinta Arts Festival (Festival) to be displayed at City Hall. Two City Council Members in conjunction with two members of the Cultural Arts Commission view the art work at the Festival and make a selection. At the November 19, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council considered participation in the La Quinta Arts Foundation's (Foundation) Plein Air event to be held January 19-26, 2003. The Foundation requested the City purchase an art piece from the event on January 26, 2003. There were three options available to the City Council for consideration: Choose a particular artist and commission a specific scene or view to be painted; host a group of artists by invitation to paint at a particular place, or select a piece from the completed 2 f 1 S:\COMMUNITY SERVICES\CCREPORTS\CC.228.PLEIN AIR PURCHASE COMMITTEE 12-17-02.DOC work. Correspondence from the La Quinta Arts Foundation regarding this request is provided as Attachment 1. In the past, the City Council has selected two members to participate as members of the La Quinta Civic Art Purchase Committee for the Festival, in which the City selects artwork to be displayed at a City facility. Along with two Council members, two Cultural Arts Commissioners have also participated as Committee members each year. A committee could be formed to select artwork from the Plein Air event. The Committee could utilize the same format as for the Festival, consisting of two City Council members and two Cultural Arts Commissioners, with the Community Services Director providing staff support to the Committee. Should the City Council wish to form a Plein Air Committee utilizing the Cultural Arts Commissioners, staff will place this item on the Cultural Arts Commission's January 9, 2003 agenda for consideration. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Appoint two City Council Members to serve on the Plein Air Art Purchase Committee to select art during the La Quinta Arts Foundation Plein Air event; request two Cultural Arts Commissioners participate on the Committee; choose an option for selecting an art piece, and authorize an expenditure of up to $2,500 from Account # 101-101-703-899; or 2. Do not appoint two City Council Members to serve on the Plein Air Art Purchase Committee to select art during the La Quinta Arts Foundation Plein Air event; nor request two Cultural Arts Commissioners participate on the Committee, and do not authorize an expenditure of up to $2,500 from Account # 101-101-703-899; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Dodie Horvitz, G*munity Services Director Approved for submission by: 264, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager_ 0 2 Attachment 1. Correspondence from the La Quinta Arts Foundation S:\COMMUNITY SERVICES\CCREPORTS\CC.228.PLEIN AIR PURCHASE COMMITTEE 12-17-02.DOC ATTACHMENT 1 October 22, 2002 Dodie Horvitz Community Services Director City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Dodie, WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: 1 LA QUINTA FOUNDATION On behalf of La Quinta Arts Foundation, thank you for taking time to discuss the possibility of the City of La Quinta's participation in the Civic Purchase Award Program for the 5th Annual Desert Plein Air, A Celebration of Outdoor Painting, January 19-26, 2003. Plein Air is a style of painting popularized by the French Impressionists of the late 1800s, where artists paint on location capturing a particular moment in time. The artist's subjects are landscapes, urbanscapes and slice of life vignettes of people going about their daily outdoor activities. The 50 contemporary masters invited to Desert Plein Air are particularly inspired by their surroundings, images and light, which makes the entire Coachella Valley a painter's paradise. Spectators are encouraged to watch the artists in action, and there are a number of opportunities where artists can be encouraged to paint in La Quinta at your request or commission, such as the Trail Head Facility, St. Francis of Assisi Church, La Quinta Resort & Club, and the City Hall Campus. There are a few different approaches to facilitate your participation in the Civic Purchase Award Program. The Council may wish to choose a particular artist and commission a specific scene or view to be painted, or you may wish to host a group of artists by invitation to paint at a particular place, or you may simply wait to see what is produced from the weeklong paintings and make a selection afterward. A broad range of the artwork for sale at Desert Plein Air usually falls between $500 and $5,000. Pricing varies depending on size, detail and the artist's renown. We have examples of all the artist's work, and we would be most pleased to work with you to aid in your approach to the program. Desert Plein Air is one of La Quinta Arts Foundation's primary fundraising events. Artists donate 20% of their sales to LQAF's education outreach and scholarship programs that serve the entire Coachella Valley. I have enclosed an information sheet listing some of the programs that are funded with the proceeds of our 263 events. 604 POST OFFICE BOX 777 ♦ LA QUINTA, CA 92253 ♦ 760 564 1244 ♦ FAX 760 564 6884 We see The Civic Purchase Award Program as a win -win all around. The City of La Quinta has the opportunity to add beautiful artwork to their public art collection that creates historical record and the reproduced image might be used for posters and note cards; the artists receive the honor and recognition of the special award; and La Quinta Arts Foundation forms new partnerships to facilitate our mission of "Promoting and Cultivating the Arts Through Education." Please let me know what additional assistance or materials you require and when this proposal can be agendized so that I can be present, I may be reached at 564-1244, extension 106. Best always, Rommi O'Brien Director of Marketing La Quinta Arts Foundation 264 0G5 Tity/ 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Consideration of Permit Application to the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service Regarding the Amendment to the Fringe -Toed Lizard MOU RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the application and authorize the City Manager to sign the necessary documents. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: In Spring of 2001, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and its member cities and the County of Riverside entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) which amended the Coachella Valley Fringe - toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. This MOU was extended to January 2, 2003 by Council authorization on October 1, 2002. In order to continue, the City is now required to complete an application to the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service and submit it to CVAG by January 3, 2003. This action will allow the release of the public review draft of the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Further, pursuant to staff at CVAG, this action does not require the City to adopt the final version of the MSHCP. A draft letter (Attachment 1) is included for your consideration indicating that the City reserves the right to take what ever action on the plan in the future as it deems appropriate. The matter is before the City Council for their consideration. 265 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the Application and authorize the City Manager to sign the necessary documents; or 2. Do not approve the Application nor authorize the City Manager to sign the necessary documents; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully subfnitted, Hermkrt iunity Development Director Approved for submission by: 'ZThomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Draft Letter 26f� r ATTACHMENT #1 December 18, 2002 Ms. Patricia A. Larson, Executive Director Coachella Valley Association of Governments 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 220 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Application to the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service Dear Ms. Larson: The City Council authorized me to sign the above application on December 17, 2002. The Council wanted to reiterate that this action does not guarantee that the City will adopt the final version of the MSHCP. Sincerely, Thomas P. Genovese City Manager c: City Council Jerry Herman, Community Development Director 267 T4ht 4 a tP Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Request for Proposal (RFP) to Prepare the City Master Drainage Plan and Appoint a Consultant Selection Committee RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: -, CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Authorize staff to distribute a Request for Proposal (RFP) to prepare the City Master Drainage Plan and appoint a Consultant Selection Committee. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. The project is included, in the amount of $75,000, within the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget for the Public Works Development and Traffic Division. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The proposed work effort will result in a City-wide Master Drainage Plan, which will provide an assessment of the City's existing drainage facilities and make recommendations for possible changes to the City's design standards in order to provide greater flood protection for the City in the future. The Consultant Selection Process outlined within City Resolution 96-80 shall be followed. With this report, the City Council is notified of the potential need to contract for professional services in excess of $10,000. Staff suggests the City Council appoint the Consultant Selection Committee consisting of the following members: Tim Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Speer, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Nick Nickerson, Project Manager 263 Pending City Council authorization to distribute the attached RFP (Attachment 1) on December 17, 2002, the project schedule is as follows: Issue RFP December 18, 2002 Proposal Due Date January 21, 2003 Consultant Selection Process February 2003 Recommendations to City Council March 2003 Project Duration April - September 2003 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize staff to distribute a Request for Proposal (RFP) to prepare the City Master Drainage Plan and appoint a Consultant Selection Committee; or 2. Do not authorize staff to distribute a Request for Proposal (RFP) to prepare the City Master Drainage Plan and do not appoint a Consultant Selection Committee; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, imothy R.AonaWon, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Request for Proposal (RFP) 269 ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN The City of La Quinta requests proposals from qualified professional engineering consultants to prepare a Master Drainage Plan (MDP) for the City of La Quinta. At a minimum, the MDP will include the following elements: Aerial Topographic, Facilities And Hydrologic Map This map shall cover the entire city at a scale of 1-inch to 400-feet showing contours at four -foot intervals. Electronic overlay layers shall be provided and maps shall be prepared that include the following information: 1. Existing and proposed channels and storm drains with sizes, dimensions and flow rates 2. City/private maintained retention basins with design volumes 3. Alternates studies 4. Drainage areas and flow rates 5. Recommended improvements Research Provide the present hydrologic and hydraulic design criteria used for the design of channels, storm drains, street flow capacity, retention basins (include percolation rates and freeboard) and house pad elevation. 2. Provide the hydrologic and hydraulic design criteria used for existing drainage facilities. 3. Provide the design criteria/assumptions used by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to design these facilities for the Evacuation Channel and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. Evaluation 1. Analyze existing public drainage facilities for conformance with existing design criteria. 2. Identify existing Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Zone A areas. 3. Develop and recommend an appropriate methodology for testing percolation. Once accepted by the City Engineer, the methodology will be used to evaluate the percolation rate used for determining the storage volumes for future retention basins. TAMDEPT\PROJECTS\2002 Pdcts\Maater Drainage P1an\RPPDrainageP1an. rd 270 004 4. Provide field percolation testing for the various bottom surfaces used for retention basins, test if the percolation rate decreases over time, and investigate what maintenance is being done to maintain the design percolation rates. 5. Evaluate dry well designs and drainage connections to dry wells. Conclusions Provide a summary of findings which shall include drainage deficiencies, FEMA Zone A areas and an evaluation of the existing drainage design criteria. Study Alternates Study alternates that will eliminate the City's drainage deficiencies and FEMA Zone A areas. Recommendations Make recommendations for improvements that will eliminate drainage deficiencies and FEMA Zone A areas in the city. The recommended improvements shall be grouped into major drainage areas and prioritized. Funding sources shall be recommended CVWD funding, Federal funding, City funding, developer built improvements, etc. Master Drainage Plan Preliminary Design and Cost Estimates Prepare a preliminary design for the recommended improvements. The design shall include the type of improvement, alignment or location, section and size, easement requirements, environmental issues and cost estimate, which will be summarized in table form. Master Drainage Plan Hydrology Map The hydrology map shall include the recommended improvements, the major drainage areas and the flow rates and storage volumes for existing and proposed improvements. Project Development Process Generally, the project development process will be as follows: 1. Project Kick-off Initial meeting between the consultant and City staff to identify project constraints and obj ectives. TAPWDEPTIPROJECTS\2002 Plots\Master Drainage Plan\RFPDrainagePlan.wpd 271 005 2. Agency Approval A. Consultant will prepare and submit a draft report outlining the results of the plan. The report will include an executive summary written in easy to understand terminology. B. Based upon comments received from the City, consultant will revise the draft report and resubmit. C. Staff approved Master Drainage Plan will be submitted to the City Council for review and comment. Consultant will be expected to prepare any necessary supporting documentation. D. Based upon comments received from the City Council, consultant may be required to perform additional analysis. 3. Proposal Format Proposals (work proposal and cost proposal) are to be submitted in separate envelopes provided by the City, clearly marked with the consultants name, address and phone number. Only one proposal per consultant will be considered. Proposal packages are to be submitted to the City on/or before January 21, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. Proposals received after the stated deadline shall not be accepted. Proposal packages are to be delivered to: Steven D. Speer, P.E., Assistant City Engineer City of La Quinta Public Works Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Consultants are encouraged to keep their proposals brief and relevant to the specific work required. Proposals shall include the following items: 1. Work Proposal (envelope 1) - submit 4 copies E. Cover Letter (1) The name, address and phone number of the consultant's contact person for the remainder of the selection process. (2) Any qualifying statements or comments regarding the consultant's proposal, the information provided in the RFP or the proposed contract. TAMDEPT\PROJECTS\2002 Pdcts\Master Drainage PIanWPDrainagePIan.wpd 272 006 (3) Identification of sub -consultants and their responsibilities. F. Statement of Qualifications (1) A listing of proposed project personnel, including personal experiences and individual resumes for prime and sub -consultants. (2) Consultant's and sub -consultant experience with similar work, including names and current phone numbers of reference for listed projects. G. Project Understanding and Approach A description of your project understanding and how you will approach the project. H. Scope of Work Program A description of the tasks, sub -tasks, and deliverables that will be provided. I. Project Schedule A project schedule is to be submitted describing the nature and scheduling of proposed tasks and reflecting April 1, 2003 as the start date. 2. Cost Proposal (envelope 2) The consultant is to submit a detailed cost proposal for all services and materials anticipated in completing the project. Man-hours and extended billing rates per classification of personnel will be indicated for each task and/or sub -task defined. Selection Process Work Programs will be reviewed by a Consultant Selection Committee. The Committee will rank the consultants for contract negotiations based upon the materials submitted within the Work Proposal. The Committee may choose to interview two or more closely -rated firms, but will not expect or schedule time for elaborate presentations. Cost proposals will be opened only after the ranking process is complete. The City will open contract negotiations with the top ranked firm. The successful consultant will be expected to enter into the attached Professional Services Agreement. TAPWDEPT\PROJECTS\2002 PrjusWas[er Drainage Plan\RPPDrainagePlan.wpd 273 667 CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN COST PROPOSAL SHEET The following is a summary of costs to provide the services outlined in the Request for Proposals for Professional engineering consultants to prepare Master Drainage Plan for the City of La Quinta and will be used as the basis for negotiating a Professional Services Agreement: Work Objectives Proposed Cost 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 11. $ TOTAL LUMP SUM FIXED FEE: $ Consultant may include as many, or as few, work objectives if believes are necessary to complete the project. Attached herein is a detailed man-hour and fee breakdown for the tasks and sub -tasks defined in our proposal. Prime Consultant TAPWDEPT\PROJECTS\2002 PdasWaster Drainage Plan\RFPDrainagePlan.wpd Date Signed 274 Lo Ly REPORT INFORMATIONAL ITEM: T4ht 4 4de(v COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES November 18, 2002 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Community Services Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Study Session Room of the La Quinta Civic Center. Chairperson St. Johns presided over the meeting. Commissioner Calhoun led the Pledge of Allegiance. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioner Victoria St. Johns Commissioner Michele Boudreau Commissioner Gary Calhoun Commissioner Mike Davis MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Deborah Bechard (Asked to be excused due to illness) STAFF PRESENT: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director II. PUBLIC COMMENT- None III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of October 14, 2002 B. Monthly Department Report for September 2002 It was moved by Commissioners Calhoun/Davis to approve the Consent Calendar with corrections made to the minutes. Unanimous. V. PUBLIC HEARING — None. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Youth Workshop Information The Commission discussed placing the skate park issue on the next Youth Workshop agenda. The next meeting will be held on November 21. Participants will be invited to attend the next Community Services Commission meeting on December 9, 2002 to gain input as to the components the skaters would like to see as well as the rules that must be established. 4 �' ) Community Services Commission Minutes November 18, 2002 Paqe 2. It was moved by Commissioners Boudreau/Davis to have Commissioners Davis and Calhoun attend the next Youth Workshop and to invite skaters to the December 9, 2002 Commission meeting. Unanimous. B. Civic Center Campus Dedication and Annual Tree Lighting Ceremony The Community Services Commission will assist with the annual Tree Lighting Ceremony and Commissioner Calhoun has volunteered to be Santa this year. Marni Francisco will contact the Commissioners with specific tasks. It was moved by Commissioners Davis/Boudreau that the Commission will assist with the Civic Center Campus Dedication and Annual Tree Lighting Ceremony. Unanimous. C. Breakfast with Santa It was moved by Calhoun/Davis to assist with Breakfast with Santa on December 14, 2002. Unanimous. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIALS A. Possible Dog Park Locations Staff gave an overview of the City Council's consideration for a dog park location. Staff is to measure the Senior Center site, as well as the site at Fritz Burns Park and provide this information for City Council consideration. Vill. COMMISSIONER ITEMS IX. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioners Davis/Boudreau to adjourn the Community Services Commission meeting. Unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. NEXT MEETING INFORMATION Monday, December 9, 2002 @7:00 PM La Quinta Civic Center Study Session Room Submitted by: Dade Horvitz, ity Services Director 27G 002 SACOMMUNITY SERVICES\COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION\MINUTESCSC\2002\CSCMIN. 11. 18.02.DOC REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 17 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 6, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:02 a.m. by Planning Manager Oscar Orci who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt and David Thorns. It was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to excuse Committee Member Cunningham. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Principal Planner Fred Baker, Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of October 2, 2002. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to approve the Minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Sire Development Permit 2002-751; a request of Washington 1 1 1, LTD - Dale Frank and Associates for review of architecture and conceptual landscaping plans for the first phase of Washington Park Commercial Center located on the south side of Highway 1 1 1, between Washington Street and Adams Street. G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\11-6-02.wpd 1 �� Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes November 6, 2002 1. Principal Planner Fred Baker gave an explanation of the project and introduced Mr. Dale Frank, developer of the project, gave presentations on the project and introduced Mr. Saeid Shantiyai, Project Director for MCG Architecture, Mr. Greg Lyon, Director of Design for MCG Architecture, Mr. Hal Hall with HH Landscaping, Mr. Fred Stephenson, Director of Marketing for Moorefield Construction, who were available to answer questions. 2. Committee Member Thorns asked if there was a proposed tenant for Buildings 3 and 4. Mr. Frank stated he has not concentrated on the smaller users, but on the larger users. Committee Member Thoms asked about the space between the smaller tenants building and Lowe's building. Mr. Frank stated the space will be for the required storm retention and it will also be spread out throughout the site and landscaped. Between the buildings there will be a fountain/water feature that re -circulates. It will be an Art in Public Places feature. Committee Member Thorns stated that between Building 3 and 4 there appears to be a place for public use. Mr. Frank indicated the public use areas on the plan. Committee Member Thorns stated it is more visual appealing if you do not have cars parked in front of that area. The south side does not have cars and the north has cars headed in. He would like to see that moved. Staff stated the entire specific plan is under review including landscape setbacks and additional right of way. Committee Member Thorns stated he would like to restrict any parking in front of the public use area. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the parking area behind Building 3; what divides this area from the Lowe's parking. Mr. Frank stated there is no access through to Lowe's but an area with a planter. It is for deliveries and employee parking. Lowe's has a five foot perimeter landscaping around their building. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the shade structures in front of Target. Mr. Shantiyai, stated there were no covers; the area was for cart storage. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about small planters in front of the building. Mr. Frank stated they originally had them, but removed them. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there was any exterior wood work. Mr. Greg Lyon, MCG Architecture, gave a presentation on the building architecture. 278 0 l", G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\l 1-6-02.wpd 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes November 6, 2002 4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the front of the building was wainscot. Mr. Shantiyai stated yes, but there is a change in material to break up the building. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the shade covers would be wood or metal. Mr. Shantiyai stated they are going toward metal due to the weather in the desert. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the same material should be for trash enclosures. 5. Committee Member Thoms asked if the Target building was block. Mr. Shantiyai stated it will be split face and precise block to break it up and create depth and the wainscot effect. Mr. Shantiyai stated the purpose is to break up the mass of the building. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the mechanical equipment. Mr. Shantiyai stated it would be hidden behind the parapet wall. 7. Committee Member Thoms stated he had a concern about the building having so much grey material. Mr. Shantiyai stated they will be introducing different colors. The sample board shows texture, not color. The Target building will have different colors and textures. 8. Committee Member Thoms stated he has no problems with the landscape concept. He would like to see at key points some scale and interest versus having a lot of plants. Get some strength out of the landscape materials to give importance to certain areas. Mr. Shantiyai stated they have done this on the entrances to the site. Committee Member Thoms stated it, is not important to concentrate on the smaller areas where people travel. Mr. Frank stated the City has a requirement for mounding that will lend itself to the site. 9. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the trees proposed for the parking lot will give a good feel to the site. What he is concerned about is that the planting areas being too small for a tree to survive. He would suggest the Mesquite tree not be used in a small area. He would also suggest using a different tree than the Bottlebrush to eliminate the mess. Also, do not use the Date palms in heavy traffic areas and they should not come from an old grove to see that they are not stressed. 279 003 G:\WPDOCSWRLC\l 1-6-02.wpd 3 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes November 6, 2002 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 041 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002- 751, as amended: A. Condition added: Parking in front of Building 3 parking shall be restricted to handicapped only. B. Condition: Delete Bottlebrush trees from the landscape pallette. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2002-752; a request of Cornerstone Development for review of architecture and landscaping plans for a model complex, located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive. 1. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit gave an explanation of the project and introduced Mr. Alan Levin and Joe Swain, representing Cornerstone Development, who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Thoms asked about the contour mounding as it appears to be partly in the planting area and partly in the lawn area and he would prefer it be in the lawn area only. He asked if they would be doing both the front and rear yard landscaping. Mr. Swain stated front only. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it would be nice to upgrade the irrigating system as well as the planting material. 4. Committee Member Thorns asked if the front yards would be maintained by the homeowners' association (HOA). Mr. Alan Levin stated no, the HOA would only take care of the entries and perimeter landscaping. There would be no common area meters. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 042 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002- 752, as amended: A. Condition: Contouring to be in the lawn area only and not in the planting area. 280 o04 Unanimously approved. G:\WPDOCSWRLC\l 1-6-02.wpd 4 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes November 6, 2002 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on December 4, 2002. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1:37 a.m. on November 6, 2002. Respectfully submitted, 4�13 T SAWYER, Executive Secretary City of -La Quinta, California 281 0 n 5 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\l 1-6-02.wpd 5 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /8 MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 21, 2002 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Maria Puente at 4:00 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mouriquand, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman Puente. Staff Present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Principal Planner Stan Sawa and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer A. Election of Chair and Vice Chair. 1. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Irwin to nominate Leslie Mouriquand as Chairperson. There being no other nominations, nominations were closed and Commissioner Mouriquand was unanimously elected as Chairperson. 2. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Wright to nominate Archie Sharp as Vice Chairperson. There being no other nominations, nominations were closed and Commissioner Sharp was unanimously elected as Vice Chairperson II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Wright to approve the Minutes of October 17, 2002 as submitted. Unanimously approved. PACAROLYMHist Pres Com\HPC11-21-02.wpd -1- 280. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes November 21, 2002 V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Report on Archaeological Testing and Mitigation at a portion of Site CA- RIV-1 50 (Phase II. for the area generally bounded by Highway 111. Adams Street. Avenue 47. Washington Street • I ! Simon Drive Applicant: D. principals)Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love and Michael Hogan, 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Sharp stated this was a significant sign. 3. Commissioner Irwin stated she wished there had been pictures. 4. Chairperson Mouriquand stated she was concerned that no cremation sites were found on this site as it is next to the Lowe's site where there were cremation sites found. This is an old site and highly significant for this area. She asked how staff's recommendation "A" would be monitored. Would the Building and Safety Department comply with this recommendation? Staff would keep close communication with them to ensure it is completed. Chairperson Mouriquand stated that because this site is so significant and this is the final investigation on this site, in order to keep public accountability, she would recommend there be a publication of the final report with ten copies to the City and the public library and a public presentation to the City Council or some professional organization. This would carry this to its ultimate conclusion for this report. Has there been any discussion of a plaque on the site that here once lied a very important village site? Staff did not know of any at this time. 5. Commissioner Irwin noted Council had been requiring a plaque on historic sites. The applicant, Mr. Hal Hall stated they had no objection and would see that one is installed on site. 6. Commissioner Wright asked that any photographs be made into a record for the site. PACAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC11-21-02.wpd -2- f 31 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes November 21, 2002 7. Chairperson Mouriquand asked that a photo album be included in the final report. She asked for clarification as to why different sizes of mesh were used. Half inch screen is too large and too much material will be lost. She asked staff to see what size was actually used and the justification for the size used. She commended the report. On Page 15 of the report she would like more elaboration as to whether or not a roasting pit was found or specifically what was found. Was charcoal found? Also, why do they not know if there was sidewall found. It is not documented as to whether or not it was found and the word "probably" needs to be elaborated on. The two items need to be clarified. 8. Commissioner Irwin suggested Lowe's site also have a plaque to note this archaeological site as well. These two sites are the two largest sites in the City. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2002-025 accepting the Report on Archaeological Testing and Mitigation for a portion of Site CA-RIV-150 (Phase II), subject to conditions. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Chairperson Mouriquand reviewed the CVAS Newsletter and the Cal Poly Pomona Newsletter. She also gave staff information on the Making of the American Scene. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Sharp to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to a regularly scheduled meeting to be held on December 19, 2002. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:30 p.m. Unanimously approved. Respectfully submitted by: Betty awyer Secretary 234 P:\CAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC11-21-02.wpd -3- REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /9 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 12, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Butler who asked Commissioner Abels to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abels, Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Richard Butler. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Manager Oscar Orci, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Butler asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of October 22, 2002. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Abels to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. B. Department Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Variance 2002-031 and Parcel Map 30892: a request of Lench Design Group for review of a variance to the lot width and size standards and subdivision of a lot into two lots located at 53-220 and 53-240 Avenida Rubio. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\1 1-1 2-02.wpd 1 285 Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 2002 1. Chairman Butler opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Commissioner Robbins moved that the staff report be waived. Unanimously approved. 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Skip Lench, applicant, stated he was available to answer any questions. 3. There being no questions of the applicant and no other public comment, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 4. Chairman Butler asked why this was not caught by the Title Company. Mr. Lench stated one caught it and the other didn't. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-105 approving Variance 2002-031, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Butler. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 6. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Tyler/Abets to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-106 approving Tentative Parcel Map 30892, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: None. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Discussion regarding Planning Commission Study Sessions. 296 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\1 1-1 2-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 2002 1 . Commissioner Tyler stated he was reintroducing the subject to see if it would be appropriate to start having study sessions again. 2. Commissioner Abels/Robbins noted other cities that held study sessions and how informative they could be. 3. Commissioner Kirk stated study session can be used to work out the deals and the public hearing becomes only a formality and public input becomes an after thought. 4. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the City Council has set the procedures for Planning Commission meetings. There is no Brown Act violation by having a study session. It is more of a due process issue. The problem is that during study sessions statements are made that shows a determination has been made prior to the public hearing. Any person can speak on the agenda items, but study sessions lend itself to statements being made that show a decision preference. 5. Chairman Butler asked how a study session could be defined to information only and not discussion. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the public hearing could be opened at 3:00 p.m., discuss the issues and then continue the hearing to 7:00 p.m. 6. Commissioner Tyler stated the study session could be held a week or two before the pubic hearing to gather information. 7. Commissioner Robbins stated that on larger issues, such as the General Plan update, it would help to have study sessions before the public hearing. 8. Chairman Butler stated it appeared the consensus of the Commission was to not have regular study sessions, but hold them only as a need occurred. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated it could be held on a one time basis. She would recommend that if the Commission believes there is not enough time to consider a project, it can be continued and that would be a more defensable stance to have a study session. B. Discussion regarding canceling the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on December 24, 2002. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Ables to cancel the meeting of 287 December 24, 2002. Unanimously approved. 0E13 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-12-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes November 12, 2002 C. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of November 5, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Kirk to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held November 26, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 7:21 p.m. on November 12, 2002. Respectfully submitted, B Minta, er, Executive Secretary v• City o a California 298. 004 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\1 1-1 2-02.wpd 4 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 26, 2002 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Butler who lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abels, Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Richard Butler. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, City Engineer Tim Jonasson, Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Principal Planner Fred Baker, Associate Engineer Elsa Paisley, Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Butler asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of November 12, 2002. Commissioner Kirk noted that on Page 2, Item 5 under Roll Call, Commissioner Tyler's vote should show that he was in favor of the project. There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to approve the minutes as amended. Unanimously approved. B. Department Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental - 11-It 2002-45 '. Specif ic ' 'I 0ff•1§I-Ir1�Ir11-1 #4, Conditional Use Pemit 2002-072, Tentative Parcel Map 30903, and Site Development Permit •• request of Dale Frank and 289 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 Associates/Washington 1 1 1 , LTD, for: 1) certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact; 2) consideration of design guidelines and development standards for a 488,050 square foot commercial center; 3) consideration of a conditional use permit to allow a health club over 50.62 square feet; 4) consideration of a tentative parcel map to allow the subdivision of 50.71 acres into six parcels; and 5) Consideration of a site development permit to allow construction of five commercial buildings for the property bounded by Highway 1 1 1 on the north, Avenue 47 on the south, Washington Street on the West and Adams Street on the east. 1 . Chairman Butler opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if La Quinta Center Drive is a public or private street. Staff stated it is private and pointed out all the access points. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked for clarification on the traffic assessment portion of the Environmental Checklist. Environmental Consultant Nicole Criste stated the traffic assessment looked at overall trips and pass by trips are those trips that would be on Washington Street regardless, and would stop in at the center. Commissioner Kirk asked if a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan would be required. Staff stated it would be required. This is the first project that has been conditioned to provide a TDM. Commissioner Kirk asked what the use was for the drive through on Shop 3. Staff stated at the present there is no specified use, but they are talking to Starbucks. The drive through would be approved as part of the Specific Plan. 4. Commissioner Robbins asked if the Champion Chevrolet building and the building at the corner, comply with the height requirements. Staff stated La Quinta Court does have buildings that were approved in excess of the 22-foot height limitation. Commissioner Robbins asked if a Big 5 Sporting Goods store had not already been approved for the center across the street. Staff stated they have decided to be in this project. zoo G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 5. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition 7 of the Specific Plan where the applicant is being asked to comply with a future General Plan Amendment. He asked how the City can require the applicant to meet a condition that is not in place at the time of approval. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the current General Plan identifies Washington Street as an eight lane roadway and there is a potential to reduce that within a General Plan Amendment. The applicant will be required to comply with whichever General Plan requirement is in place at the time the project is built. Commissioner Tyler asked the City Attorney if this was possible. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated he was uncertain and would respond after reviewing the appropriate document. Commissioner Tyler asked why the applicant was being required to pay 50% of the signal at Adams Street and Avenue 47 when it only has one third of the corner or 25%. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated 50% has already been paid for by the Auto Mall and there is no other developer who can be charged, so the applicant has the burden of the remainder of the cost. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dale Frank, applicant, gave a presentation on the project. In regard to the General Plan Amendment he would dedicate six feet on Washington Street so, if the City goes to four lanes, the land is available with no utilities in the street. 7. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Abels asked about the proposed market that would be in competition with the existing market. Mr. Frank stated Jensons is a specialty market and the proposed Henry's is a national company that is similar to a Trader Joes which is a different product type. 8. Commissioner Robbins asked about the ancillary doors on the front of the Target building. Mr. Frank stated the site plan is from the Target corporation. Mr. Saeid Shantiyai, representing Target, stated they are offices that need outdoor access. He went on to explain the building design. 9. Commissioner Kirk stated the Target elevation seems to suffer architecturally in comparison to the other parts of the center. By 291 itself it is a good design, but in comparison to the other buildings G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\1 1-26-02.wpd 3 003 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 it falls short. Buildings 3 and 4 are very well done. The Target needs some work between the entrance and the garden center. The height of Target building is 35 feet and you are asking for additional height on the other buildings. Mr. Frank stated functionally they may need to raise the height. Commissioner Kirk stated that giving more height may be a trade off for additional facade. He would like to see ways to improve the facade design on the Target building. Mr. Frank stated that the parking is sunken which may raise the building. Commissioner Kirk asked about the accesses on Avenue 47. Mr. Frank stated it was an error on the plans and his architects will have to reconfigure the accesses. Commissioner Kirk asked about the impact on the residents on the south side of Avenue 47 in regard to circulation. Mr. Frank stated they have considered the residents and believe they have taken everything into consideration. Commissioner Kirk asked why the landscaping was being phased. Mr. Shantiyai stated the landscaping is colored only for affect, it is not a phasing plan. Mr. Frank stated that as each building is built, the landscaping will be complete for that entire portion of that site. 10. Commissioner Tyler noted that the landscaping looks great on paper, but does not always translate into reality. He asked the location of the loading dock. Mr. Frank noted the location on the site plan. Mr. Shantiyai stated the plan is based on Target's prototype. Commissioner Tyler asked about color variations on the buildings. Mr. Shantiyai stated the color palette shows the colors intended to be used. 11. Commissioner Abels stated he thought there should be a vestibule on the front of the larger stores. Mr. Shantiyai stated they do intend to use one. 12. Chairman Butler stated he is not in favor of a drive through in association with a fast food. He noted the landscaping and extensive trees, but in reality they do not reach any real growth. Mr. Frank stated they are looking for larger trees to initially plant. 13. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Butler asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Adam Zack, Vice President of Jensons Food, stated they do not oppose the project, but have an objection to Henry's. It is similar to their 29 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 4 O1 o 4 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 store. They are trying to build their store and there lease does have exclusive uses. Besides bring competition to an existing tenant, they believe it may violate their lease. 14. There being no further public participation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 15. Commissioner Abels stated he thinks it is a great project and he supports it. 16. Commissioner Tyler stated he agrees and asked if the health club was an uncertainty. If the health club was not a known entity, why process the conditional use permit. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it gives the applicant the opportunity to secure a health club owner. 17. Commissioner Kirk stated this is an outstanding project and he likes the landscaping. Circulation issues are minor and could be worked out with staff. His greatest concern is the Target building. He thinks it would be appropriate for the building to be taller than proposed and would suggest conditioning the building to be larger and higher with landscaping enhanced along the front. There could be some additional vertical relief as well as horizontal relief. 18. Commissioner Robbins stated that in this case he likes the rear of the building more than the front. They need to do something with the doors on the front of the building. 19. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-107 recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2002-459, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Butler. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 20. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-108 recommending approval of Specific Plan 87-011 Amendment #4, subject to th93 findings and conditions as amended. 005) G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 a. Condition #82: add after lighting plan, "including illumination plan". ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 21. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-109 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-1 10 recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map 30903, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 23. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Tyler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-111 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002-751, subject to the findings and conditions as amended. a. Condition # The Target building shall have an average vertical height of 35 feet and up to 40 feet and work with staff to seek variation in color or materials on the mid- section of the front facade. b. A vestibule shall be added at the entrance. C. Articulation shall be added around the doors on the front elevation. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 294- G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\1 1-26-02.wpd 6 005 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 24. Commissioner Robbins/Kirk moved to reconsider the Specific Plan Amendment. Unanimously approved. 25. It was moved and seconded by Chairman Butler and seconded by Commissioner Abels to add a condition to the Specific Plan that no drive through associated with a fast food stores shall be allowed. Unanimously approved. Chairman Butler recessed the meeting at 8:50 p.m. and reconvened at 8:57 p.m. B. Village Use Permit 2002-015; a request of Prest Vuksic Architects for consideration of development plans for construction of a 6,700 square foot office building on a 0.4 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Calle Amigo and Desert Club Drive. 1. Commissioner Kirk excused himself due to a potential conflict of interest due to proximity of the project to his residence, and left the dais. 2. Chairman Butler opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the small sliver of land across from Calle Amigo was buildable. Staff stated probably not as a commercial building. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern was that if it is not buildable, this facade would be seen from Avenue 52. Also, it appears the planter in the middle of the parking lot could be eliminated to give more parking spaces. Staff stated they are required to have two-way travel in the parking lot. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dave Prest, representing the applicant stated he was available to answer any questions. 5. Commissioner Robbins asked how the applicant feels about the suggestions of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee. Mr. Prest stated they had no objections and had offered to eliminate a parking space to create a gathering place for the workers of the office building as they suggested.�� 007 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 6. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked if the restrooms both have access from the outside of the building and if so, he assumes they would be controlled by access keys. Mr. Prest stated the idea is to have fairly small offices and one common restroom for the entire building instead of each office. 7. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Butler asked if there was any other public comment. 8. There being no further public participation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 9. Commissioner Tyler questioned the need for the "gathering place". 10. Commissioner Robbins stated he did agree with idea as it does make for a nicer place to work. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-112, approving Village Use Permit 2002-015, subject to the conditions as recommended: a. Condition #30: The gathering place shall be located on the westernmost parking stall in front of the building entry. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. Commissioner Kirk rejoined the Commission. C. Environmental Assessment 99-389 Addendum and Tentative Tract Man 29323. Amendment #2; a request of Cornerstone Development for certification of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389 and consideration of a second amendment to the tract map to add ten acres and 32 residential lots to the original 117 acre site, located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. 1. Chairman Butler opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file 2�r in the Community Development Department. U , G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioners asked staff to explain the letter received from the City of Indio. Staff stated the issues raised in their letter were vague and staff was unable to reach anyone from the City of Indio to obtain an explanation. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked staff if the developer on the east side of the street, which is in the City of Indio, is not required to pay his portion of the signal costs, would this developer be responsible for the full amount of the signal, and if the developer in Indio pays nothing, then this developer would pay nothing. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer responded that if the developer creates the impact there is an argument that supports the concept of the developer paying for 100% of the mitigation costs. Staff indicated they would review the condition for an opportunity to clarify the language. 4. Commissioner Robbins stated that since the east side is in the City of Indio, La Quinta cannot require that developer to pay their portion of the signal, and this developer would have to pay the entire cost for the signal. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked if the utility lines would be undergrounded. Staff stated they did not believe they would be. No response was received from IID. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Marvin Roos, Mainiero Smith and Associates, engineers for the project, stated they are happy with the redesign, but would prefer to have a right in-, right out rather than a signal. In addition, they would like to request that four lots be removed from the list of approved pad elevations. Lots 42, 43, 236, 237. 7. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked about the signal costs. 8. Mr. Allan Levin, representing Cornerstone, stated that in regard to the traffic signal, they would be willing to accept limited access instead of paying for the entire signal. The project across the street does not have any requirement to pay any portion of the signal and therefore, it puts the entire burden on them. In regard G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 9 0 0 9 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 to the issue on compatibility, Ponderosa has already been approved for their elevations. In order to approve the units for this development, Ponderosa withdrew their approval and both are before the Commission for review and approval. This way they would not be in violation of the compatibility requirement. In addition, staff has stipulated there can be nothing in the five yard setback. He would like to ask for some latitude for access and air conditioners, etc. 9. Mr. Joe Swain, Cornerstone Developers, stated that in regard to the Biology report there is reference to contacting Fish and Wildlife. Nothing was found in the study and US Fish and Wildlife has transferred the responsibility to Fish and Game who has said the only thing they would be concerned with would be the vegetation. They are working on a mitigation with them. 10. There being no further questions of the applicant, and no other public participation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 11. Commissioners discussed whether or not to require the signal or right -in, right -out. Staff recommended leaving the condition as written. 12. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-1 13, recommending certification of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-1 14 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 29323 Amendment #2, subject to the conditions as amended: a. Condition 37: Delete Lots 42, 43, 236, 237 b. Condition #59.A.1.: Change "reimbursement" to "cash fee" C. Condition #70: change CVWD to Myoma Dunes 298 d. Condition #89: Appropriate wildlife agency a T O G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2002-752; a request of Cornerstone Developers/Ponderosa Homes for consideration of a residential tract development with seven single family prototypes with three facade treatments each, and landscaping design plans for the property located on the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, within Tentative Tract 29323. 1 . Chairman Butler asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked the location of the models. Staff indicated their location on the site plan. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Joe Swain, representing the applicant, gave an explanation of the models and their location. 4. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked if the CC&R's would eliminate the parking of RV's on the street. Mr. Swain stated this would be included in the CC&R's. 5. There being no further questions of the applicant and no other public participation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Minute Motion 2002-018, approving Site Development Permit 2002-752, subject to the conditions as amended: 299 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 11 0 i 1 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 a. Condition added: If there is an option for a third car garage, it shall be conditioned to a 16 foot approach, except on a cul-de-sac. Unanimously approved. B. Right of Way Vacation 2002-01 1; a request of the Coral Mountain LLC, for determination of General Plan consistency of the proposed 60-foot wide street right of way vacation for that portion of Madison Street between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. Chairman Butler asked for the staff report. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked why they want to move the street. Staff stated it is to improve their land plan. Commissioner Tyler stated he would like to know the reason, before approving the request. 3. Commissioner Robbins asked about all the utilities in Madison Street; will they also be realigned. Staff stated this is the first step in the process. The next step is for the City Council to adopt a Resolution of Intent. During the process if utilities are found to be in the street, they will be conditioned to relocated them. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Grady Sparks, representing Coral Mountain, stated the reason for the realignment is for land space and the type of developments they are proposing. A lot of open space is needed or an additional 40- 45 acres. This gives a nice gentle sweep to break up the asphalt jungle. 5. There being no further questions of the applicant and no public comment, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. G L G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 12 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 6. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-115, making a determination of General Plan consistency for Right of Way Vacation 2002-01 1, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Right of War Vacation 2002-012; a request of the Louis Campagna, for determination of General Plan consistency for the vacation of a portion of Calle Tampico near Avenida Navarro. 1 . Chairman Butler asked for the staff report. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if this vacation is approved, will the vacated portion become a part of Lot 1 . Staff stated it would. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Louis Campagana stated he was available to answer any questions. 4. There being no questions of the applicant and no other public participation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-116, making a determination of General Plan consistency for Right of Way Vacation 2002-012, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. 301 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 13 V -3 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of November 19, 2002. B. Commissioners asked staff to agendize a discussion of the Compatibility Ordinance. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Kirk to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held December 10, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned 10:24 at p.m. on November 26, 2002. Res ectfully submitted, Betty . awyer, Executive Secretary City o La Quinta, California 3014? G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 14 V 1 4 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD Meeting September 18, 2002 CALL TO ORDER Regular meeting of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board was called to order at the hour of 5:30 P.M. by Chairman Mahfoud, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Board Members Moulin, Lewis, Olander, Mortenson and Chairman Mahfoud ABSENT: Board Members Osborne and Felice OTHERS PRESENT: John Falconer, Finance Director and Vianka Orrantia, Secretary II PUBLIC COMMENTS - None III CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA — (This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled on the agenda.) Mr. Falconer advised Board that the two handouts were informational items only. The first handout was a Memorandum from the City Attorney, Kathy Jenson, which is being distributed, to all Boards and Commissions regarding the Campaign Contributions limitations. In response to Chairman Mahfoud, Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the second handout was a summary of the September 121' LAIF Conference, and that Chairman Mahfoud and Board Member Olander attended the conference and may want to discuss the conference under Board Member Items. IV CONSENT CALENDAR Approval of Minutes of Meeting on July 10, 2002 for the Investment Advisory Board. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Moulin/Lewis to approve the Minutes of July 10, 2002. Motion carried unanimously. "I Investment Advisory Board Minutes September 18, 2002 V BUSINESS SESSION A. Transmittal of Treasury Report for June and July 2002 Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the City was over the limit in Mutual Funds in the June Report, therefore the City is required to report this exception. On page 002 of the June Report this exception was documented along with the actions that were taken to correct it and dated as to when this was completed. Mr. Falconer advised the Board of the written action which stated that as of June 30, 2002, the City was over the limit in Mutual Funds and on the first available day, which was July 3rd, Staff invested $30 million in U.S. Treasury Bills from a recently completed bond issue to correct this exception. Mr. Falconer also advised the Board that in the month of June that there was a great deal of activity, due to the purchase of the Ranch Property, money going out (which was purchased the third week of June) and also the receipt of the bond proceeds, money coming in, which left a net affect with a decrease of $9 million in the City portfolio. In response to Chairman Mahfoud, Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the effective bond rate yield was a little over 5 %. Mr. Falconer stated in retrospect that he should have directed U.S. Bank, the custodian, to invest the proceeds directly into U.S. Treasury Bills rather into money market funds. Board Member Mortenson asked the Board if there was another alternative to the current money market that the City is currently invested in, he felt that rate at 1 % was quite low. Mr. Falconer replied that the rates are even lower. Mr. Falconer also stated that there are other state approved money market funds through Wells Fargo, and the Investment Advisory Board felt that the treasury money market fund was the most prudent for the City. Board Member Mortenson commented to the Board that the management fees paid at 40 basis points for the money market funds seemed high and recommended possibly checking into a fund that pays a lower management fee and a higher rate. Mr. Falconer stated that current market funds are the ones that U.S. Bank currently carries. In response to Board Member Olander, Mr. Falconer confirmed the average weighted maturity currently is at 132 days. 2 304 Investment Advisory Board Minutes September 18, 2002 Board Member Mortenson asked the Board if the LAIF Pool .34 of 1 % reflected on page 008, if this was an annualized rate? Mr. Falconer replied that this rate is adjusted every quarter. Mr. Falconer advised that Board that on page 012, of the July report, the maximums reflected represent the previous year's maximums and not the current year, increasing the amounts from $3 million to $5 million (except Sallie Mae) and the ability to extend from two to five years. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that Staff is not recommending investing over two years at this time. These maximums will be reflected in the August report. MOTION — It was moved by Board Members Lewis/Olander to review, received and file the Treasurer's Report for June and July 2002. Motion carried unanimously. VI CORRESONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL A. Month End Cash Report - August 2002 Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the handout included with the Month End Cash Report was for informational purposes and to review the County's current investments. General discussion ensued by the Board regarding the County's investments in GSE's. In response to Board Member Mortenson, Mr. Falconer explained the Month End Cash Report is generated due to the delay in generating the complete Treasurers Report. Noted and Filed B. Pooled Money Investment Report for June and July 2002. In response to Board Member Lewis, Mr. Falconer commented that most people stay invested in LAIF as rates decline, and leave as rates begin to pick up. LAIF is used mainly as a short-term "vehicle." Noted and Filed 3 305 Investment Advisory Board Minutes September 18, 2002 VII BOARD MEMBER ITEMS LAIF Conference Chairman Mahfoud advised the Board that LAIF is handled by 15 to 20 State employees. Board Member Olander advised the Board that on an average day about $800 million is invested and is done in about an hour and a half. In response to Board Member Moulin, Mr. Falconer advised the Board, that in the Orange County situation, they had a run on their pool based on their cash flow strategy, and that LAIF would have adequate funds to cover any withdrawals. Mr. Falconer also advised the Board that LAIF has a buy and hold strategy and that LAIF does not time the market or sell before maturity. In response to Chairman Mahfoud's question, Mr. Bill Sherwood of LAIF stated that in the 30 years the Chief Investment Officer has been employed at LAIF, they have never had a loss. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that included in the handouts, there is a chart that refers to their maturities in million of dollars and the number of days they will come due. LAIF has a short-term investment strategy and is not subject to market risk. Mr. Falconer also advised the Board that during one of the conference presentations, they stressed that LAIF participants benefit from the fact that they are included with the general and state funds that are required by statute to be invested with the State Treasurer. Other benefits offered in the investment of LAIF are same day liquidity and the benefit of five-year investments. Also emphasized at the presentation was that 43% of the money (which represents LAIF) is due within 90 days. Chairman Mahfoud emphasized to the Board that the State Employees are very highly conservative in managing their portfolio. Chairman Mahfoud advised the Board that the LAIF funds are trust funds and are not touchable by politicians. There are two other types of funds that are borrowed against, the surplus and the general funds. There are five different groups that audit each transaction each day. Board Member Olander suggested to the Board that the LAIF percentage would be increased for next year's policy and to give staff more flexibility with other types of investments, due to the diminishment of other products. Board Member Lewis stated that he was not comfortable that LAIF invests in time deposits with local banks and mortgage backed products. n 306 Investment Advisory Board September 18, 2002 Minutes Other Handout Mr. Falconer suggested to the Board that the memo handout on FNMA and Freddie Mac be added to the December Agenda for further discussion and consideration with other investment options. VII ADJOURNMENT MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Lewis/Moulin to adjourn the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Submitted by, Vianka Orrantia Secretary 5 307 DEPARTMENT REPORT: I - A c&ht 4 CP Q9&rcv MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager DATE: December 17, 2002 SUBJECT: Department Report — Response to Public Comments The following public comments were made at the December 3, 2002, City Council meeting: 1. Jim Murphy, 54-580 Riviera, of PGA West, asked when the City would be assuming the maintenance and liability responsibilities for the equestrian trail along Madison Street. • Acceptance of this project was delayed at the Riverside County Recorder's office, but is on today's Agenda as Consent Item No. 13. 2. John McLauglin, 44-405 Willow Circle, expressed gratitude to Mayor Pena for his years of service on the City Council. He also thanked everyone who supported Measure M during the last election, and urged Council to find a way to fund additional fire protection services. As for concern about the quality of life impact if other services are cut, he noted the quality of life is greatly impacted if someone's life is lost due to inadequate emergency care. • Council thanked Mr. McLaughlin for his comments. No further action was required. 308 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 1 _ 5 c&tT 4 49mro MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager��i✓� DATE: December 17, 2002 RE: Department Report — Grant Update The following is an update of various grants for which City staff has applied, will be applying, or is currently exploring. During this calendar year, the City obtained $41,304 in grant awards, and has applied for an additional $290,835 in grant funding. t California Integrated Waste Management Board The California Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) provided $800,000 statewide for waste tire playground cover grants. The City's proposal for replacement of the deteriorated playground surface material under the water feature at Adams Park was approved by the City Council on October 16, 2001, and the grant was awarded to the City on February 19, 2002 in the amount of $6,900. The new surface material has been installed and has greatly improved child safety at the park, while reducing the number of used tires placed in landfills. The project is awaiting preparation of a permanent sign acknowledging CIWMB's participation in the funding of the project, which will be placed near the water feature at the park. ■ Department of Conservation The California Department of Conservation provides funding for programs that encourage recycling and litter abatement. The City Council approved the grant application for this program on April 16, 2002. The proposed program activities include the purchase and placement of mobile recycling containers to be used at City -sponsored community events. The containers 3n9 will also be offered for use at events not sponsored by the City, but held at City facilities. In addition, funds from this grant will be used to purchase picnic furniture made from recycled materials to be placed at the new Community Park. The City was awarded $7,467 for this project on July 29, 2002. Staff will be ordering the containers and equipment early next year. ■ Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 2002 This program is administered by the Federal Bureau of Justice Assistance for programs that reduce crime and improve public safety. This year, the City applied for funds on-line, and was awarded $26,937. The funds will be used for officer overtime and special enforcement activities. ■ State of California Proposition 40 Funding On March 5, 2002, California voters passed Proposition 40, "The California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002" (2002 Resources Bond), which includes a Per Capita grant program of $372,500,000. The preliminary allocation for the City of La Quinta is $220,000.00. The City has previously executed contracts with the State for $176,000 in block grant funding from the Prop 12 program, as well as $56,486 under the RZH Urban Park component. ■ Colmac Air Quality Enhancement Fund The Riverside Board of Supervisors offered funding through the Colmac Air Quality Enhancement Fund for programs that enhance air quality in the Coachella Valley. The City Council approved the grant application on September 17, 2002 for funding in the amount of $36,500 to purchase and install three weather stations to be used primarily by the Public Works Department for monitoring PM-10 control methods. Recipients of the funds will be notified in 2003. ■ Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee The City has already been awarded $595,235 in funds from the Federal TEA-21 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program. A portion of these funds will be used in support of the PM-10 stabilization project on Miles Avenue and Washington Street parkways. The City Council approved an application on November 5, 2002 which seeks "local match" funding for the stabilization project from MSRC in the amount of $77,1 19. Recipients of the MSRC funds will be notified in January 2003. 310 ■ Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee The City has already been awarded AB 2766 funds that can be used for partial payment (25%) of the cost of a CNG street sweeper. The City Council approved an application on November 5, 2002 seeking grant funds in the amount of $139,285.50, or 75% of the cost of the sweeper. Fund recipients should be notified early in 2003. ■ California Department of Transportation The 2003/2004 Bicycle Transportation Account will provide $7.2 million for cities and counties to improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters. The City Council approved a grant application on November 19, 2002 for funding of Class II bikeways along portions of Fred Waring, Miles and Avenue 52 in the amount of $37,931. Notification of recipients chosen for funding is expected in early 2003. This listing does not include subvention funds and other funds that the City automatically receives from the Federal, State, and County governments. Examples of this type of revenue include California Traffic Congestion Relief Funds (AB 2928), California Law Enforcement Equipment Program funds, various law enforcement funds, Community Development Block Grant funds, COPS funds, and various transportation -related funds. 311 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3 - A DECEMBER 17 JANUARY 7 JANUARY 21 FEBRUARY 4 FEBRUARY 18 MARCH 4 MARCH 18 APRIL 1 APRIL 15 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 2002 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday 4 Thurs ay 5 Friday 6 S�turday 7 1 2 3 6:00 PM CVAG 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC 3:00 PM - 7:00 Exec. Cmte.- Council Meeting PM Civic Center Pena Campus Dedication 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 7:00 PM Commu- 7:00 PM Mosquito 9:00 AM RCTC 7:00 PM Cultural nity Services Abate. -Perkins Arts Commission Commission 7:00 PM Planning 6:00 PM Employ - Commission ee Recognition ' Dinner 11:30AM-3:30 PM Holiday Open House 5:30 PM Invest- ment Advisory Board 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2:00 PM City 3:00 PM Historic Council Meeting Preservation Commission 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Q Q 9:00 AM Hendersonon 1 st Day of Christmas Eve Christmas Day Winter (CITY HALL (CITY HALL OPEN) CLOSED) 29 30 31 c" November 025 } S M T W T F S' January 03 S MT W T F S 1 2 ` 1 1 2 3 4 baj Ir. '+ New Years Eve HALL 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 urt : � 5 6 7 8 9 10 11� , (CITY OPEN) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 17 1897,4 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25` &ft 24 25 26 27 28 29 301� 26 27 28 29 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 12/10/2002 313 January 2003 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 12:00 PM Mayors Lunch December 02 February 03 S M T W T F S S MT W T F S New Years Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 * ' 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 4 (City Hall CLOSED) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28_: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 r 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 6 7 .. 8 9 10 11 2:00 PM City 9:00 AM RCTC 12:00 PM Energy/ Council Meeting 5:30 PM Invest- Envi-Sniff ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural Board Arts Commission 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM Mosquito 3:00 PM Historic Safety -Perkins Abate. -Perkins Preservation 12:00 PM Transp. 7:00 PM Planning Commission -Perkins Commission 6:00 PM League of Cities-Riv.Div. 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9:00 AM CVB- Henderson 12:00 PM CVAG Human/Comm- 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson 2:00 PM City Adolph Council Meeting 4:00 PM DRRA Martin Luther Airp-Henderson King's Birthday (CITY HALL CLOSED) 26 27 28 29 30 31 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning Exec Com- Adolph Commission *' fi�: wf a a" Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 12/10/2002 J February 2003 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday SS y January March °' S M T W T F S S M T W T F]18 1 2 g h` 5 6 7 8 9 1g p 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 x� .' 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 s > 12 13 14 15 16 1d _ `16 17 18 19 20 21 22 19 20 21 22 23 223 24 25 26 27 28 29 262728293033031 �2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM Mosquito 9:00 AM RCTC 12:00 PM Energy/ _! , Safety -Perkins Abate. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- Envi-Sniff ""��`I( 12:00 PM Transp. 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins Commission Board Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Valentines Day of Cities-Riv.Div. 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission Lincoln's Birth- day (City Hall Open) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 9:00 AM CVB- Henderson 3:00 PM Historic Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting President's Day Washington's (CITY HALL Birthday CLOSED) 23 24 25 26 27 28! 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- p' Exec Com- Commission Human/Comm- Henderson yky'i: Adolph Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 12/10/2002 " Qum& j"co G�MOFT9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety -fj�. DATE: December 17, 2002 RE: Monthly Department Report - November 2002 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of November. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $164,335,434.50 which represents an issuance of 2,886 building permits through November; • 2,318 animal control cases have been handled through November; • 3,064 code compliance cases have been initiated through November; • 6 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in November; • $1,860.00 - garage sale permit income in November; • $2,987.00 - Senior Center income in November: New Life Community Church $ 550.00 Center of Spirit Inter. Fellowship 550.00 Smith Memorial Service 462.00 Tot Stop 195.00 Mendoza Birthday Party 1,230.00 $2,987.00 316 v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 00 — N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 (O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) M LU 00 f» 6v 69 69 69 va 64 64 � sv (A m uq Cr) m U O N o00 aT a) J � N 6q a E» to U 0 m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a = ui o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j Z Z 69 Oro 69 69 U-) 69 9 G 64 69 6F) H7 64 69 6H 64 N 64 ell 0 69 ui K '0 dT 0 r- O O (n r 0 (h N co (f) O 00 00 (f) O O m CO N v I� n O to 00 N cr� to () I-- CO N O 00 00 h M (0 (O 0 O V O CO m Lr) I- r a0 m 64 00 N (0 O N (n (f) O Cl) Cl) (f v Ic T ❑j- M_ V' `7 V' V N O m (O 117 (fl M CV N (f) (fl CR c7 (n 6i (O (D co a0 (f) m W } In eA 69 69 I- N 69 m N 69 N 00 (n LON 64 N 69 6H V 64 to n W � M w LL 6 m O O O O O O O Ln 00 O Cl) Ln O m n (n O (n V O O O M O f- m O f- V m m (D 0 CO O V 0 0 m O O O (,j CO (f) 00 a Q' 2 O (f-T M M O 69 0 m m O (O C& 00 CO I-- 00 W F- e- 0 00 � V cr) 00 69. O ('r) (fl a u> e� Op � C � � v p v m 6Ns CN 6 L o v rr 00 O o 0 :rt. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W) ll� O Cl? M O O O O 00 cM O 00 O m 00 N N O O LO M (D (0 (0 r- r O m I- N N w N V' N U (D 69 m I- m M I- 00 O m v (C) 00 V O O ❑ V N CO) O m (0 O Cl)- N m 1� CO N V O M 00 V N V N f- (D (O M V O r` 0) N m N m 00 N v LD (0 (f) O I- LO Il- N ! O J00 CO I� r 64 69 d' IT 6Fi .- (n 6.) N DJ (0 ti 00 Z O (fl E9 (h to 69 69 QO) ❑ y N Z 69 (fl 0 0: Q_ W m ~ Q O O O LO O O O O (n O O O O O N O 00 O v O I- (DJ Wi Ix ('7 O V t() V O V O m O O (0 0o (n O v LL a W J O O M NU) (0 m (O 00 M O IT (f) O LO O N 00 LO O O m (0 M O > Q N f- ffi I- Cl) (O (0 W (0 m LO It (n (f) Cl) (�7 O M m 'IT le C9 O > ❑ 00 V' C6 (fl (() I- G 00 (fl v O v O Z Z Z r O (0 P� N m N r- bs 7 r` () CO (O M U G O T co 0o co 6ro 6�v 6a v (° 69 �D J H N � 6A 64 tCN U 00 ❑ix 6,; 0 0 0 (n O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lo ui ('7 O M v O O O O I� O O V O V O O OD fM Z �i O r O O O O O O O (D O O O O N D= m 64 N (n O O 6H O O O O 64 q O O Cl) W U I- O V W N m (n O O CO O ((7 In t Z LO W O (O LO I-t r N co Cl) COO 000 64Cl) (+07 N 64 N N69 � 69 NT 64 69 EH LOG9 6v (O 69 G9 CO N V' ' It CO (n r N «) (D (n co LOO N ^ c7 N (•) m N ❑ � M J N O (+7 N Cl) (0 I- Cl) m O (.0 (b M O LOw N N (0 V LO 00 N V ('7 V N N I- a0 ❑ (� (0 (0 N ❑} Z Z ui = W J Z W O OCY) ON O N N O D I� co w O coO N = > —� W p y Z O >, p D Q } w Q I_ J } J Q Z Z O U Jg JU QHOJ Q JF w a Q U F- U Q OZ Q O Q a'` L` zz LLI w w ww O w Q m � JZ J o U =aa D O W Q w U a 0- w O CO Q ?O O w w }z O O w p c U m U w 0 0 U of Iml I-- 317 002 ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: Nov 2002 Steve Alexander, Jackie Misuraca and Moises Rodarte ANIMAL PICKUPS YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 02 DATE 01 HANDLED DATE 02 DATE 01 D Alive 27 319 407 Bite Reports 3 40 26 Dead 5 63 56 Animal Trap OTI 2 16 36 Set Ups 1 58 69 Cats Alive 8 198 191 Dead 1 68 59 OTI 0 8 3 Other Animals Alive 29 131 94 Dead---6— 72 75 TOTAL ANIMALS Alive 64 648 692 Dead 12 203 190 OTI 2 24 39 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 78 875 921 VIOLATIONS: Dogs at Large Noise Disturbance Defecation removal License Violation Other Monthly Total YEAR TO DATE No Owner 25 0 0 0 0 25 Warnings 0 0 1 0 0 1 Cruelty to Animals 0 6 9 Vicious Animal Restraining 0 2 1 Special Hour Patrols 2 Zoning Violations 0 Lost & Found 40 Animal Rescue 6 Outside Agency ---!— City Reclaims 11 Other 13 TOTALS 77 Citations 17 1 0 22 0 40 172 13 329 40 85 6 14 386 337 22 9 4 0 116 114 183 133 863 797 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: NOV 02 - 221 / NOV 01 - 175 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED: NOV 02 - 2 318 / NOV 01 - 2.510 318 003 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: Nov. 2002 Nov 02 YEAR TO DATE 02 YEAR TO DATE 01 ABATEMENTS: Nuisance Abatements Started 77 1,976 1,114 Weed Abatements Started 4 164 120 Vehicle Abatements Started 53 872 1,102 Dwelling Abatements Started 2 36 8 Animal Control Started 5 16 0 TOTAL STARTED 141 3,064 2,344 TOTAL COMPLETED 292 2,718 2,175 Case Follow -Ups 246 3,805 3,493 Home Occupation Inspections 10 111 89 Business License Inspections 0 0 13 Garage sale permits Issued 186 1,484 1,446 319 004 N N N N N N O O O SS O CD+y'NNNNNN Z H Z M W W 2 M a D 0 0 2 > otSUw Lij w zwo F- QM� H U) VFnQowm I� W W O J Of(ACl. Ucn CO O N O Cn U) CANI-crMN(0 00 CA 0) v U) M d T CA r 17 r M 00000-CA COO t f.- 1- ti 00 f` '-T a � N N CM 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 I co co to co co co Cl)'N LO CM Cl) Lce)O Cl) M Ui CC) 04 Cn CN Cn N N N N N N 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 m r+ y y la a a a a a �UUUUUU H H H H H H >,Z_Z_Z_Z_Z_Z_ v D D D D M000000 BI :5 :5 :5 0 r�LUa0aw W U) 00Z � Z>Z:5 Z W a W Y w- z0 a� 0 0 � m J w W W -J QaQOU O r O O r 0 ICA 'I! 00 M f- d M M N M N O m O Cn Ict w U �U W Z M _ U J cq Z Z — a W p M Z a ur Z_ Z N U W U w m W > Z � JO -Wof D O M w (n t ULLI M wLL W OZI=- awl"UZ=W MZ 7}wai»� m U2-I�wp0= ma0Lg�0� 0wCDt—ON C M M M W W M_ —I00 00 00 OOccc(.0co d 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 3^Q IM DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4 OF fly 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR I DECEMBER 17, 2002 DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of November. 321 PAMonthly Report Folder\Monthly Report 11-02.wpd 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT NOVEMBER 2002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUP'S 1 submitted Development Agreements 0 submitted Environmental Assessments 1 submitted Fugitive Dust Control 0 submitted General Plan Amendment 1 submitted Lot Line Adjustments 2 submitted Minor Adjustments 0 submitted MVP's 2 submitted Parcel Maps 0 submitted Parcel Mergers 0 submitted Sign Permits 5 submitted Site Development Permit 4 submitted Specific Plans submitted Tentative Tract Maps 0 submitted TUP's 7 submitted Zone Change 0 submitted Zoning Code Amendments 0 submitted 322 PAMonthly Report Folder\Monthly Report 11-02.wpd > N 00 p U U aU >> o o Ca O Q Uaaas N p N qt,-- 00 LO , p r--C c J U U co <a.Ua. >> o o CL NN �� 00 LO O U U aU O a . , N Io �(D 0 N J U as o C c a- N N O0 COS N �- N U U aU o c N N O0 NM N p U U aU > O - a N O N (0O r-(D CN J U as M N c' c °EO o O NC U °Ca U O CL -0 CQo C O •� 4. +.+ (o Q +, Q. � N Q- (nJa C O C O LO >• `� C — 0 0 O U L cn O a) a) a a. N 0 O "O O C a) C .N a) EO cn 'a > cow a) E N c MM O m ° -a C O O f0 O �- a co O L 0 O C __ CL = L N� Co O �> U L CL Q `� N O +� cn a) ° "O N U O }' cn a L O c Z O cn U O N > co cn >� y a) o E +00 O U O > cc a O > C =C L C +, ° (0 N a ) o +r D N C E O '�- Q o ° r cCIO cUC O_ M o c d co o co }O-, o o` X ID a -a O O LO M �., a) p ' C c Q 4, o N -a O o a O � L CLQ O co co Cc MNa U O NpQ C Co E O O cc0 "O + 0 UO c . O= (o° c�^ co , (n o cO° U O co N CL c CL O o C co O CM NC O C co `} 00 oco O O cc > n ° c : n UEoot a a c c-0 o rnU C14a> U oO CL > 0 CL Z d W N O aN 1 O N "O N O 6 U0 QOc cy) ao)0 N > +I O CL) D cc L 4- L Q 1- � UE mc CO o cn ° co - O O a) -0C °co ° CL N ' N 0 +� i +� Q >, «- CIO T "a a) co aCp co EQ> E >- 0 = E o Q O > O O O co O (1J O E O� cc cn U (n N O x.0 O � a c0 O cr L L Q a) co o It W N L C• N a. co U a CL N > _ CIO°- U N _, (o c `u +-� c O (o O Cl)C a) O C 0 O .a c O Lco O p E Q O E ° c cn c O M O co O j "OC c(n N O E > CIDC) O oU) 0O LO Oa cy co aD (M 00 Lj Co 0) cv j 00 LO y CN N O 0 aa)) O O C V ,- LM 04 a co , O a) O 0 L N CV) O N> a) C N NL a) 'a YC LE5 c ° O U ` CU a 0 O pY F- >M F-Wu LUNG (nUa. Z M 323 z U d ►a►�•jj U W A M 00 NO N L -- ° � u Q ,+- O c o Q E O a U C M O 0 cn 00 c Q N C Q a. W 0 o > a o Q00 =- N Q O N �p 0 _B CD e— u J Q -0-0 C C O "O }' " C O cB i c0 E U� CAc O Cr C (n -C Q O O c O ++ U C O ,C •O 7 Q w C �O E U c t O U i� t N 7 m cn C N 0 > C Q ca co N y > y cc 0 ° -c o a� LO c6 y d O a)�= ` _O G7 J ° •- + U � U C O U O C O C �`� ° O ►- y O �'' U >. O E o c6 — 4 J -C ° e7 + Uca a) co N_ M E y f d° 0 a a� E O cco a) m 0 a� t E c cn ° c � 0 n CL p 041 ° cn a) 0 U CD C C O 00 O N O C C E U O C)'� a) ° 0 c O C o c +� Q — E a) C p• 7 "O -0U (A > Q O X U a) -0 C 0 f° O +r O C OC w k •Nd 1� m m c c c rn o cn Q a) c E Cl)M > O OMB N Q c0 c�Lo0 cn^tnCV) o c c° U O r- co N O N N d 0 , SON SOON I�� Lao U-CLCL0 �0 � �w�w NUcU)I c/)c0 324 O a_ W Q F- F- W O cc J Q U LU VJ c O +- M O M Cl) O cD a O CM LO Q p CO N M �U D a� N O a) N O fn c� CO Y N — ^ N 0 N a� y Q_ Y p O O O oOR 0 U o O � LO r LO 0 4� c CD > 7 cp +1 N QO o I + c v co ui CO O a x o aa) c o co U yr Y m p c m v, U Y c c c0 (Dc E 'a d O aD w O a c OO 0 7 7 O O N CU c0 F ++ CO U .c M M 0 co m (D a Y Q C7 D cn 06 c co a Y U a`) c a) y O LL C J U c y o c c > c 0 = O a (D_ m 325 DEPARTMENT REPORT: F C� OF L 9 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY OUNCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECT DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2002 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2002 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2003: Jan 6 *Monthly Putting Contest Jan 6 *Beginning Rug Hooking Seminar Jan 6 *Windows 98/2000/XP Computer Course Jan 6 *Introduction to Computers Class Jan 6 *Introduction to the Internet Class Jan 8 *Digital Photography Class Jan 9 *Tai Chi Class Jan 9 *Cooking Class Jan 9 *Free Hi -CAP Counseling Jan 10 *New Introductory Organ Class Jan 14 *CPR Class Jan 16 *Chili Cook -Off Luncheon Jan 17 *Evening Ballroom Dance & Social Jan 21 Belly Dancing Lessons, Senior Center Jan 21 Acrylic Painting, Senior Center Jan 21 Interior Design for Your Home, Senior Center Jan 21 *AARP Driver Safety Program Jan 21 Karate for Kids, La Quinta High School Jan 21 Hatha Yoga, Senior Center Jan 21 Taekwondo Classes, La Quinta High School Jan 21 Italian for Travelers, Senior Center Jan 21 *Free Hearing Consultations Jan 21 Line Dance Lessons, La Quinta High School Jan 22 Vinyasa Flow Yoga, Senior Center Jan 22 Intermediate Computers, "Beyond the Basics," Senior Center Jan 22 Botanical Watercolors, Art Room, Senior Center Jan 23 Adobe Photoshop Elements, Senior Center Jan 23 Cooking Light, La Quinta High School Jan 25 Hand Made Glycerin Soap, Senior Center Jan 27 The Art of Guitar, Senior Center Jan 27 Beginning Computers, Senior Center Jan 27 Ballroom Dance Lessons, Classic & Latin, Senior Center Jan 27 *IID Utility Assistance Seminar Jan 29 "Let's Fondue" Cooking Class, La Quinta High School Jan 30 *New Jazz Guitar Lessons *Daytime Senior Center class or activity T4'Y1 4 lwQ" Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of November 2002 Summary Sheet Program 2002 2001 Variance Sessions Per Month 2002 2001 Leisure Classes 55 15 40 27 7 Special Events 273 215 58 4 1 Adult Sports 347 152 195 19 10 Senior Center 1745 1302 443 141 94 Total 2420 1684 736 191 112 Senior Services Senior Center 494 378 116 18 12 Total 494 378 116 18 12 Sports Complex Use AYSO 1,650 1450 200 20 20 LQ & PD Football 200 200 0 10 10 Total 1,850 1650 200 30 30 Total Programs 4,764 3,712 1052 239 154 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 1 5391 8251 286 Total Volunteer Hours 1 5391 825 -286 Monthlv Revenue Senior Center $ 8,185.00 $ 7,853.00 $ 332.00 Community Services $ 2,203.00 $ 3,778.00 $ (1,575.00) Total Revenue $ 10,388.00 $ 11,631.00 $ (1,243.00) Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 33,218.00 $ 28,253.00 $ 4,965.00 Community Services $ 27,693.00 $ 24,282.00 $ 3,411.00 Total Revenue to Date $ 60,911.00 $ 52,535.00 $ 8,376.00 327 O0 Community Services Program Report for November 2002 2002 2001 2002 2001 Participants Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Beginning Computers 5 7 -2 2 4 Adobe Photoshop Elements 7 0 7 3 0 Tae Kwon Do 8 8 0 6 3 Hatha Yoga 20 0 20 6 0 Vinyasa Flow Yoga 4 0 4 3 0 Fabulous Fondue 3 0 3 3 0 Line Dance Lessons 8 0 8 4 0 Totals 55 151 401 27 1 7 2002 2001 2002 2001 Participants Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Special Events Mexico Shopping Trip 90 0 90 1 0 Stargazing 150 215 -65 1 1 Carlsbad Village Faire 15 0 15 1 0 South Coast Plaza 181 0 181 0 Totals 2731 215 581 4 1 2nn2 2001 2002 2001 Participants Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Adult Sports Open Gym Basketball 207 72 135 15 7 Adult Soccer League 140 80 60 4 3 Totals 1 347 152 195 19 10 Recreation Totals 6751 3821 2931 501 18 Page 2 328' O rI l Senior Center Attendance artici ation Participation Variance Meetin s Meetings 0 2001 Senior Activities ACBL Bridge 231 221 10 4 4 Arts and Crafts Fair 140 0 140 1 0 Ballroom Dancing, Complimentary 11 17 -6 1 1 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 481 432 49 14 10 Dog Training, Complimentary 6 6 0 1 1 Ice Cream Social 14 17 -3 2 2 Monthly Birthday Party 28 33 -5 11 1 Monthly Luncheon 106 101 5 1 1 Movie Time 44 49 -5 5 9 Pinochle 22 0 22 4 0 Putting Contest 13 8 5 2 1 Seminars 9 15 -6 1 1 Tennis 93 0 93 10 0 Tennis Social 11 0 11 1 0 Senior Activity Total 1209 899 310 48 31 Senior Leisure Classes Arts and Crafts 29 44 -15 4 5 Ballroom Dance 23 20 3 2 2 Bridge Lessons 61 33 28 6 7 Ceramics 13 13 0 3 4 Computer 29 16 13 17 4 Computer Tutor 7 1 6 7 1 Cooking 9 0 9 1 0 Dog Training Class 12 6 6 2 2 Exercise 54 48 6 11 11 Golden Tones 55 56 -1 4 3 Knitting 16 4 12 1 1 Painting 22 14 8 4 3 Quilting 35 31 4 3 3 Rug Hooking 13 3 10 4 3 Sketch in /Drawin 25 0 25 4 0 Spanish 11 0 11 3 0 Stained Glass 11 8 3 2 3 Tai Chi 14 33 -19 2 3 Tap Dance 21 40 -19 3 4 Watercolor 15 0 15 3 0 Woodcarving 29 33 -4 4 4 Yoga 32 0 32 3 0 Senior Leisure Classes Total 536 403 133 93 63 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1745 1302 443 141 94 Senior Services AARP "55" Course 32 38 -6 2 2 FIND Food Distribution 356 231 125 5 4 Hearing Consultation 1 0 1 1 0 I.I.D. Energy Assistance 9 8 1 4 3 I.I.D. Energy Assistance/No fee 4 0 4 2 0 Legal Consultation 10 10 0 1 1 Medicare/Hi Cap Consultation 9 12 -3 3 2 Volunteers 73 79 -6 n/a n/a TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 494 378 116 18 12 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 22391 1680 559 159 106 329 -0..0 1 _ DEPARTMENT REPORT: g'im - 5 OFT9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City C uncil FROM: Timothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: December 6, 2002 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of November, 2002 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update; 4. Monthly Summary of Public Works Tasks. 5. Jefferson Street Phase II Status Report ji�rnothy R. Jqjassoe Public Works Director/City Engineer 330 a � N Z >; W J Q ~ Z N ~ � O = ILN gWO U)W N W m LLY :)2 C1 w wo U V V Z J m � a w N Z W N H U 331 H z W z� Q �a ev W 45 G CO) WY O0 � UV J m a 0 W H U W Joor-V--00� - J,f`CV DO(h000" OOr CD N IT 0 I W N W LL to69�6061%4* Q O H zOD ,I--N00 00� 0r a—wv800 1� �L N d. 0 v- Q O O O ~ N W LL, b9 Eft 6ok EA w M CO I.- tnr- N'VO z O Q Z LLI2 WC G 'n V wX0 W Q U a. Z ~ g �WLLIwg� 2H (� ~ W W F-- LLTUW LL Z CO) V ly a=) 0 O 2 a 3320 0v3 z n O Q W W IL. Y U W x U z F- U w n w IL w MW cW L z Y U W x C) z g a 0 0 0 o o o Ln rn n w w w F- z W 2 W O w IL F- W W N O O T T N O x U Y W LLI C) W z 0 N x U Y w ui W Z 0 U) x U Y W W U W z 0 U) m J U H z m O U W z a Z O 2 W �zUz F= Q zd� F- 0 NO LL m z �z N U N O O N T T N O z W 2 F- N M oa LLI z J O J N O O N T T N O a z 5 ar g z O C J O 0 0 0 0 N w 0 z c7 w N U w w a I, v N O Q O 4 W J U i uO Z W ga F- aW 02 Oa J LL w w 0 N O O N N co T It N O Z 5 Cy 5 0 O w F- z W 2 a O J W > W 0 Y N to cl a 3.33 w .j JCCi04 W a Cl) CA w V W CC Q� a J O a I— Z LLI V � W O cc a ►E fa �+ C O VN fn U > O O N d O c0 w Ql y LO C') i cc i fa M LO 00 CD 3 I ++ 0 ° C O g C ° °d" � �a 0- aio° C_ OR CN cc E C VL ` Im V> v M C Ln U a vON • (n £C CN m > U U y `O co U 'p > oN y ca C)C C Ln R iA C Q ` L C ci O LO)i Cp y �° d C . O C m t J C H a O +D E y d Q1 °° = U m C �p U N C @ o O E p -C �. _d d L fa U 1cA Qy iy f-a f ° � 0O . Q 3OO „ cn M O O O +OUOo E 0QC y a Ccn C aw a) ;§ 06 y 0 C C 'O + ca cn wa =E o +J O o y ��-, c~ a 3 � o H g O M o F- U Q N C 2 I- C a 0 O U` N C� N U O U y cn Q) .0 'O N O. M . y y C N a) O>� y LL U a) O O O p a) 0 0 O O O U Lu (n W 7 .0 C D U (/� C1 U D U C) Q 0 U N v- C) -p M N N C �' O 04 C14N ' N N O m O O O N l j Lo -O O N O O O_ C G� N N I, Lu Cc M rn O M M rn y Nt c- rn a0 n (O o 0 rn rn LO O Q M M N N cn 7 y g a E (a CL cn N aD C a E 0 Vco U ° U m cn Lo O 7 ui O CO1 w O aO cn co oM yE O> O JCC. J U a U O� a) y oo �>Qo �* U a cA a Io_ U a. N 3?� 005 p Y H.0 N (a O +: v_) Cm = N O y Y O ^ O _O N C a) N �e a) O co r 00 E N +, CD 0 0 00 cm CL a.. O U O d E■ cn !E LL L J to U- J > c a) -p w v O ` C +1 o + N O 0 a)+O a)co Q U)O +vv pQO CL L 0 �1 ^c`p+ �' C a) c �° O Q U C U a) O c) � co O — I� N O_ 0 cn CO a J C7 r, 0 U +�+ LL C cp, E C p +' 7 L c Y O O Q cn 2 L Q N O Co+p+ Q M C r tom+ o E '� O C; E 2 a) Lo% t/s -o a co NO +; C „> U p) C C N .> C C � O) C .` 0 C .a O O O G U) O p C. d V 'd C2 p — O O :t J N +U O +, O J N 0 +r 00 U ` C O 0 (o N V Q O V cc C C W v Qf O a) N " N +J y �e C O to c0 O O w V N N rn +p`+ ,E C C7 in ai 00 C W o a) O V U C O cn O O C O !0 N N (o N E N E O c 3 L6 y *' 0 i Q= j 'L c tm OF co co O V ,rp_+ N ` Q +O+ O a) M "O U 00 a) a) cn > -O N O a) I- > W +• W C O 'p a) p� +V— 0= 4- cn N M __ o?j O- Q � O O > "o M O > I, O O E i U> > N co �C C C c3 = ,cu ` i a) O co Z Z C LL 0= � o O 3 O 'E5 C-4 -o � s o. - a a) c 0 a) o 0 m cr 0 3 O m o a) = m CL () C) N C> > O C LL V N co > O p co co CO O C O 4 ` co C +, U O C Q C N N d i ++ r U C E o) C co -0 +`, C coo cn U U U U y Q C O) C _� �� O C Y y O m L ++ C N N C C N Cp A M cn O N C.- Q O 0_ > — C O LL > a N a) C U O a) N a) O L 0 3 7 to C O O DN a) DUUa O O d V *= C U o O y in a) O a) 0Uco co LL Ua.000 Co— UJQOC 0 Uw 0U.� 3 y 0 U w .o as 'p cM (M It M N O C p O O O E E E r. N Ln O a) (D ~ R M a) a) -a Q) 'O N NO N O_ 00 O_ Ln O_ Ln O a) -0 a) .D O r (D 00 O O O 0E- N O MIt O N -0 -O N O 0 N O O N O a) ,� a) a)) �• _ Q1 /a) .i] E ii E I I (C O Z O O �O CD�0 + 0 +' 0_ I N O O N M 00 0 O O O O N — O O (") r 00 (0 00 O O O (o am n It F O r) O M rn O It M W Vr Lr) N rn N O O Co (fl O O Lr O d r n (o ('') Ln ('M Ln 00 D N 06 a- CD C > > N cn N C ++ U I O ` O C ` +1 ' O CY/ 0 C y a) y a% CD +, L- O �/ C O_ m Q)DO �a W i CL aN+oN c n J a x O `— O N 0 0 � N o CO CO O >, C a) E O W � LL N M Q E a) Z CL U CD N U Q Q '� cn> L- CL Q) c N � a) -0 0 c O O y c O LA O N OD Lr) �O m cR p 7 O y Y j CL MOON O vYiNcc O O O O N �# aC. O } ¢� ' C +L U y y X E O � p O O LL, . °� O p CL O co C oo U LO +�+ a N` NO O O a� o C 0 +� O t1� X N cL E co U U O +. t M N t, , a) 'a N a) •O m C o p rn c v co c g C A N 3 h v -Cc`o +1 o y}C: °' a `� C o O. T '0 ++ CO O V O m -p M 0�3 M3 aEorn-0 +`Qa 'V O• 7i)+ +.� N° Q � 4 O)O+ y ° o No U) Q v �`°°Q \oo o w -Co a) a a) Ln c n U)M � �Q Cc p L co 0 cn o � rn v vV d d0 Co - U C 4 y CL ~ en CD �UNw"m �aQ0 M: a) L L. Z L L Z r i. i , (J � U a) +, � 0 co a) +- fo � U C C E �j U C co O C C O co a) ° _0 v O cO C ai >` •p O V W +°+ c� 1p C+ 0) O _ L O to +1 cn O ti° O O O +`+ M O O C+ :t cm > O co � +• O 'tn i ++ +, cn 0 +r +� ° N s° N C O 0: a) cn C a) 03: cn O O -� O O C +' d 0 7 p C O C p cn (D C O +, O O c y a) O Q �-° DU co DU.� 0 )0 L) 0 DU (nJQ a> > 0UN c c C O N o E E E E a) (D MO LC - 0 N O C\O - O a) -0 a� O O ° O O O .a N O N O N O N O M O "O N O G1 MO O N (D .0 O Vi O (D .0 E -0 E r- O �' 0 a) +1O N . O O a)N a) N mO M N C14 OO OO a a o o °� rn LO N Ln N O O M O N M It 00 � N LLI C° o � O rn M�i c M M C ('') 0) N O D N O m N vs tn• yr yr yr N O vs �r sn cu cn(n c y o O H• fn QE Q) aEi > ° 0 U y N �' Q W a ° fn cn a) LN (O m O +, ~ C O C + CL cn� a > E E J co E E U OTC cc C Q> W ° Y C C) -CU CL to CL �_ LL_ O 0- co ' a co HU)06 >do CL co J a k Ui 7 0 0 0 N O 0 ' V Q O W C N U d +• ea O N N N Q C O L) N c � � as > m .N W G1 •C •> m O � v . O C i O� y �N C O C C E N � O ++ N O O N = O O N O ram. N O N � O W O O W � O N M 00 M to tr> `J r O H co H V W O = i C � a �0 Ii (0 a V 3 yc C CO co 33t MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PUBLIC WORK TASKS MONTH O nov.2 thru nov.30,02 Employee's Hourly Labor Breakdown Crew#1 Crew #2 jCrew 03 Maint. Mg. Code Activity 4 Men 4 Men 11 Man 1 Man Total 1000 Poking/inspection 55 751 23 153 1001 Pot Hole-RepaWPatching 8 25 33 1002 Crack/Joint-Repair 0 1003 Pavement Markin Le nds 0 1004 Pavement Ma . g 0 1005 Curb Painting 1 0 1006 Other Traffic Controls 27 27 1007 Curb & Gutter Repair/Const. 0 1008 Other Concrete RepakWConst. 0 1009 Street Sign Instal (Now) 1 30 31 1010 Street Sign Repair/Maint 8 181 26 1011 Debris Removal 1 351 5 41 1012 Right of Way Maint. 18 331 51 1021 CLEAN Catch Basin Irkt/Outlet 0 1022 Rondo Channel OutIeWauk 0 1022A Desert Club Out Mult 0 1023 Retention Basins Repair/Maint. 481 48 1024 Gutter/Median Sand Removal 1 0 1025 IStreet Sweeping (Machine) 104 104 1026 IStreet Swee ' (Hand) 0 1027 Sidewalk/Bike Path Clearing 19 6 25 1028 Dust Control 0 1029 Flood Control 0 1031 Parks/Retention Basins Inspection/Clean-up 48 48 1041 Mowin W , Shrubs & Tree Trimming 2 8 2 1 12 1051 LandscapeArrigation Contract Management 2 10 23 35 1052 L' ' ctrical Contract Management 19 19 1061 Small Tools Repair/Maint. 18 18 1062 Equipment Repair/Maint. 2 5 7 1063 Vehicle Re it Maint. 0 1081 Trash/LitteNR Removal 42 3 45 1082 Vandalism Repairs 32 341 66 1083 lGraft Removal 9 20 15 44 1084 Maint. Yard Maint. 22 16 38 1085 Seminars/TrainingSeminars/Training 11 1 12 1086 Special Events 5 3 8 1087 Citizen,Complaints/Requests 142 12 154 1088 M 9 5 14 1089 101fice (Phone, work, reports, Misc.) 27 46 73 SUBTOTAL 472 527 133 0 1132 1091 Over Time 1094 Jury 0 1095 Sick Leave 16 48 24 Be 1096 Vacation 56 54 2 112 1087 96 961 24 216 1098 _Holklay ISTO (Short Term Disability) () 160 160 1099 lBereavement (Ge2Z) 0 SUBTOTAL 168 198 50 0 TOTAL HOURS 640 725 160 160 0 1132 TOTAL MILES 34391 33201 6251 7384 338 009 DEPARTMENT REPORT: $—A Tit�p 4 P " MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, P.E(AI PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/NG DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2002 RE: JEFFERSON STREET - PHASE II: STATUS UPDATE The Jefferson Street - Phase II project has encountered significant complications in recent weeks primarily resulting from the weakened post-911 California economy, the California energy crisis, and its resulting impact on the State budget. The State Transportation Program (STP) funding that had been programmed for this project by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), but not yet listed by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in the 2002 State Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) has failed to materialize as planned. The STIP is the State's 7-Year Capital Improvement Plan; it is updated every two years on even numbered years. It had been RCTC's intent, and CVAG's, to add the Jefferson Street - Phase II project to the STIP as an amendment in October for funding in FY05/06. However, weakening tax revenues coupled with the significant shortfall in the State budget lead the CTC to stop accepting projects by ad hoc amendment that were not already listed in the STIP. The ad hoc amendment procedure was common practice in the past, but the emerging economic challenges confronting the State caused the CTC to change its practice. The CTC halted the amendment process because the Governor's Office, and Legislature, captured all unallocated state transportation funds in late summer to balance the State budget. The 2004 STIP will not be prepared until the spring of 2004. It is uncertain at this point in time what the funding availability will be when CTC issues its call for project nominations in early 2004. The optimistic guess is there may be STP funding for the project in FY07/08. However, funding availability is driven by the economy and State government decisions related to policies that it employs to balance the state budget. As a result of the news regarding deferred funding for the Jefferson Street project and other projects in the Coachella Valley, CVAG and RCTC have been evaluating and discussing what alternative options are available for funding these deferred projects. ALTERNATE FUNDING The good news with respect to the Jefferson Street project is the fact that it's a Measure A "must build project'. As a result of its Measure A status there seems to be sufficient 003 T:\PW DEPl1COU NCI L\2002\021217d.wpd political support among CVAG member agencies to honor the must build commitment sooner rather than later --- meaning as soon as practical rather than near the end of the original 20-year Measure A program which occurs in 2008. Allyn Waggle, Deputy Executive Director at CVAG, has indicated, in recent meetings called to discuss the funding issue, that CVAG has sufficient reserve funding to fund the Jefferson Street project. However, the funding is apparently allocated to other Coachella Valley projects and will require rethinking how CVAG wants to juggle and fund its local projects. Mr. Waggle has indicated this subject will be an agenda item for the January Executive Committee meeting. CVAG informed City staff on 12/13/02 that Riverside County Transportation Department has submitted a letter to CVAG making the request for the project to be funded with local funds instead of the STP funding as currently programmed. CVAG indicated that it will begin the review process and bring its recommendation to the various committees. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT The Jefferson Street project is currently stopped dead in its processing and remains in limbo until one of two possible scenarios occur: 1) The project is listed in the 2004 STIP, which can not occur until April 2004, or 2) CVAG and the project stakeholders find an alternate method to fund the project with local funds rather than STP funds. Caltrans, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), will not process or review any environmental documentation until the project is listed in the STIP. Therefore, if CVAG and its member agencies cling to the notion that the Jefferson Street project should be funded with STP funds, it means no meaningful progress can occur on this project until it is listed in the 2004 STIP in April 2004. Environmental documentation for all STIP listed projects must be processed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because the State reserves the right to assign Federal funds to STIP listed projects if it so desires. Additionally, the Jefferson Street project received an allocation of Federal funds for the Whitewater Bridge. The NEPA regulations are more complicated, restrictive, and time consuming, than the regulations found in the California Environmenal Quality Act (CEQA). So much so, that NEPA regulations do not allow preparation of construction plans to occur until the environmental document has been circulated and approved. Thus, "stopped dead" in processing means --- dead --- there is no meaningful task that can be performed until one of the two scenarios listed above has occurred. If CVAG and the project stakeholders are able to find a means to locally fund the project, the project can be processed in accordance with CEQA. In fact, there is already an existing approved CEQA environmental document for this project. It's the CEQA document that secured environmental clearance for the first phase of Jefferson Street. That 34.9 0 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\021217d.wpd 0 0 40 document identified Jefferson Street as a two-phase project with the second phase located between Indio Boulevard and Highway 111. However, that document did not envision construction of a bridge across the Whitewater Channel, or six lanes through the Westward Ho area, as is currently proposed. Therefore, the original CEQA document needs to be amended, but that procedure takes significantly less time than it does to process a new NEPA document. Additionally, it's possible to commence preparation of the construction plans before the CEQA document is amended. The only portion of the construction plans that should not be started before the CEQA document is amended is the area where the project concept is being changed. ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS Riverside County Transportation Department, acting as lead agency, and its consultants, have prepared three alternative alignments through the Westward Ho Area. These three alternatives, plus the null alternative (also known as the no -build alternative), will be evaluated regardless of whatever environmental document is prepared. It is desirable, but not essential, to designate a locally preferred project alternative (i.e., alignment in this case) prior to preparing the environmental document. In doing so, residents living in the project area, and others, have a better opportunity to evaluate and comment on the project alternative that is most likely to be built. The three alignment alternatives are: 1) Widen both sides of the street symmetrically about the existing centerline, which means take all houses on both sides of the street, or 2) Shift the centerline of the street to the west and take all of the houses on the west side and save most of the houses on the east side, or 3) Shift the centerline of the street to the east and take all of the houses on the east side and save most of the houses on the west side. Staff will bring the alignment alternatives to the City Council for a study session at the first available Council meeting after the funding issue has been discussed by the Executive Committee at CVAG in January. The civil engineering consultant retained by the County is currently preparing a detailed analysis of the impacts of the three alignments, along with a schedule that assumes a CEQA environmental process and local funding. The Council can select the preferred alignment with, or without, extensive public input. Therefore, in addition to reviewing the alternative alignments, the Council will also be asked to provide direction on how it wants to proceed with selecting the preferred alignment. Selecting a preferred alignment does not guarantee that alignment will be built. It simply implies there is a preference because the City has reviewed the alternative alignments, and for a variety of reasons including environmental processing purposes, evaluation and full disclosure, has selected an alternative that, in its judgement, is the best project alternative to advocate and pursue. That alternative must still survive the environmental process. 341 T:\PW DEPT\COU NCIL12002\021217d.wpd 003 PROJECT PHASING The City of Indio has been advocating the concept of further biforcating the Phase II project since September. Indio would like to construct the portion between Indio Boulevard and Wesward Ho Drive as soon as possible, and let the portion between Westward Ho Drive and Highway 111 trail behind as a third phase to the project. La Quinta City staff has opposed the concept to date because of its impact on the residents living on Jefferson Street in the Westward Ho area. Six -lane arterial street facilities tend to attract traffic from adjacent corridors. If Indio is allowed to construct six lanes from Indio Boulevard to Westward Ho Drive it would direct more traffic onto the two- lane portion of Jefferson Street in the Westward Ho area and further add to the traffic impact residents are currently experiencing in the area. A potential compromise between one more project, versus two more projects, would be to complete the environmental document. Bid the project as a two phase construction project in which the first phase is constructed while the right of way aquisitions and relocations take place in the Westward Ho portion of the project. Then, allow the contractor to commence the second phase as soon as the relocations are completed. More details to this concept will have to be evaluated if there is any desire to consider a compromise. In general terms, it would not be advisable to stage the construction in such a manner that the second phase trailed the first phase by more than six months. The Indio bifurcation proposal will most likely get some attention at the Executive Committee meeting when the local funding issue is discussed in January. If the bifurcation proposal surfaces at the meeting, staff will oppose (if Council concurs) any proposal to bifurcate the project. Attached for reference is a copy of Indio's letter to Allyn Waggle dated 9/26/02 that delineates Indio's reasons for wanting to bifurcate the project. The Indio letter was shared with the Jefferson Street - Phase II project design team for the first time on 12/9/02. The fifth reason stated in the letter may be the primary issue that is driving Indio to advocate project bifurcation. LEAD AGENCY CONSIDERATION It should be noted that Riverside County is no longer a stakeholder, with a jurisdiction interest, in the project as a result of the Annexation #10 (northwest quadrant of Fred Waring Drive/Jefferson Street). Annexation #10 conveyed all of the County -owned Jefferson Street right of way to La Quinta located between Fred Waring Drive and Country Club Drive. However, in spite of the change in stakeholder interests, the County is still interested in continuing with its lead agency responsibilities since all of the consultants that are needed to prepare the project for construction are already in place and under contract. 34^ T:\PWDEP7\COUNCIL\2002\021217d.wpd 004 ATTACHMENT(S) 3AA3 005 September 26, 2002 100 Civic Center Mall Mr. Allyn S. Waggle P.O. Drawer 1 788 Deputy Executive Director Indio. CA 92202 Coachella Valley Association of Governments Tel: 760.342-6500 73-710 Fred Waring Driving, Suite 200 Fax: 760.342-6556 Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Regional Arterial Jefferson Street widening (from Highway 111 to City Clerk Indio Boulevard) - ,Tel: 760.342-6581 Fax: 760 . 342-6597 Dear Mr. Waggle: Cih•Alanager Tel: 760. 342-6580 Fax: 760.342-6597 This letter is the City of Indio's request to divide and phase the subject DcvelopmcntServices project into two separate buildable segments. We propose that the first Tel: 760 .342-6541 phased segment between Westward Ho Drive and Indio Boulevard) be Fax: 760.342-6556 designed and construct immediately. The second phase (Highway 111 to Finance Westward Ho Drive) can follow when right of way and relocation issues are Tel: 760.342-6560 Fax: 760 . 342-5653 solved. Fire The justification for constructing the proposed first phase is: Tel: 760. 347-0756 Fax: 760.775-3710 1. There will be no need for relocation of any resident or business within the Human Resources Tel: 760.342-6540 above -mentioned first segment. Fax: 760.342-6597 2. The required right-of-ways for the said first segment are either acquired Police or reserved for the proposed road widing. Tel: 760. 347-8522 Fax: 760.347-4317 3. There is substantial added traffic as a result of new developments approved by both Cities of Indio and La Quinta along this segment. The EnginceringlBuilding Tel: 760.342-6530 added traffic has caused an unsafe condition, because of the fact that Fax: 760.342-6556 each of the individual regional traffic impact mitigation measures along - City Yard Jefferson Street have been deferred and consolidated into one Jefferson Tel: 760.347-1058 Fax: 760.3474190 Street buildable segment from Westward Ho Drive to Indio Boulevard. Senior Center 4. Phasing the project will allow us to attract both big and medium size Tel: 760.347-5111 contractors for the construction bidding purposes, which result in more Fax: 760.342-6557 competitive bids. This can save thousands of dollars for taxpayers. 5. Phasing the project also reduces the risks of potential delay claims that maybe caused by the property owners along the segment between Highway 111 and Westward Ho Drive. 6. The general public will better receive the phasing of the project, because of reduced traffic impact during the construction. 7. Phasing the project during the construction could be the only and better alternative logistically. 344 OU6 • • 8. The Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS) recognized and segregated different buildable segments. For instance, the TPPS identified Jefferson Street (Westward Ho Drive to Fred Waring Drive, 13- 37) and Jefferson Street (Fred Waring Drive to Indio Boulevard, B-38) as two different segments. The buildable project segment of B-37 has 22.5 overall score and, the buildable project segment of B-38 has 23 overall score in accordance with TPPS. Both segments (B-37 and B-38) have higher overall scores than the Jefferson Street segment between Highway 111 and Westward Ho Drive. Therefore the segments of Jefferson Street between Westward Ho Drive and Indio Boulevard should be built first. We appreciate your consideration for our request. We are looking forward to working with all the agencies involved in the Jefferson Street widening project for a successful and expedited conclusion. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, Roy T. Ramirez City Manager cc: Mayor and City Council Terry L. Hagen, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Amir H. Modarressi, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer 345 007 DEPARTMENT REPORT: `7 CITY OF LA Q UINTA POLICE DEPAR TMENT MONTHL Y REPOR T NOVEMBER 2002 • Incidents of domestic violence show a decline. • Incidents of DUI are down. • Burglary rates in November are half that of year 2001 for same time. • Non -Injury traffic collisions increase. 346 City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain John Horton, Commanding November 2002 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Friday, 11-01-02 (47): Deputy Gaunt caught four juveniles vandalizing city floodlights on Dunes Palms and Miles. All four juveniles were detained and then released to their parents. Deputy Gaunt will file vandalism against all four juveniles. Saturday, 11-02-02 (61): No significant activity Sunday, 11-03-02 (33): Deputy Covington arrested Kurt Hardin 27 yrs. of La Quinta for assaulting his wife, Maria 39 yrs. Deputy McFadden encountered a drop point for illegal immigrants at the 54000 block of Ave Herrera. Approx. 25 HMA's in a vermin infested house. Border Patrol responded and took all into custody. Monday, 11-04-02 (78): Deputy Bolton arrested Scot Boen (070975) for shoplifting at Home Depot, La Quinta. During a consent search of his vehicle a small amount of methamphetamine was found, along with some marijuana and drug paraphernalia Tuesday, 11-05-02 (74): No significant activity Wednesday,11-06-02 (58): No significant activity. Thursday, 11-07-02 (40): No significant activity. Friday, 11-08-02 (79): No significant activity. Saturday, 11-09-02 (87): No significant activity. Sunday, 11-10-02 (50): No significant activity. 347 Monday, 11-11-02 (57): Arson at Ftriz Burns Park, minor damage in restroom. Also graffiti, "Mr. Speedy" and JT and VJT on door. Shoshona Ritchie Gamliel, 38, arrested for violation of court order during disturbance involving child custody exchange. Tuesday, 11-12-02 (55): Deputy Lewis arrested a male subject at Wal-Mart in La Quinta for shoplifting. The subject identified himself as Javier Zamora and seeing that the subject had no identification, Deputy Lewis took him to the jail for fingerprints. CAL -ID showed that Zamora is actually Javier Andrade Baragan, 102270 of Thermal. Baragan was also booked for a felony poss. of a controlled substance warrant and false identification. Deputy Russo arrested Rosa Nunez, 082078 of Indio for shoplifting at Wal-Mart in La Quinta. Wednesday, 11-13-02 (60): Deputy Lee arrested a 17 yr. old male juvenile of La Quinta for unlawful and malicious, take down, removes injures, or obstructs any lines of electricity, poss. of a switch blade knife and brandishing a weapon, after he threatened family members with a knife and cut the phone lines to the residence while family members were trying to call the police. The suspect was found in the desert area west of Ave. Montezuma in La Quinta and had a switchblade in his possession. Deputy Coleman arrested Genevieve Snow for two misd. warrants at her residence after deputies were called to the residence for a disturbance. Deputy Hughes and Lopez conducted a pedestrian check at 78-990 Miles, Date Palm Mobile Home Park, of Miles Rupple Jr, 22years old of Indio. When asked if he had any weapons he handed over a set of brass knuckles. He was subsequently arrested for poss. of a deadly weapon. Thursday, 11-14-02 (72): At 2203 hours, Deputy Gaunt responded to the 54000 block Ave. Valejo, La Quinta in reference to a subject, David Kevin Sikorski, 042077, at that location attempting to break into the residence to get to his wife, Vanessa Sikorski, 030175. David Sikorski broke the front door to gain entry. The homeowner, Robert James Cleek, 081878, armed himself with two handguns after Sikorski threatened him with a pocketknife. Venessa Sikorski had scratch marks on her neck and a torn blouse. David Sikorski was booked for spousal abuse. No prosecution was desired reference the other misdemeanor violations. The handguns were returned to Cleek. Friday,11-15-02 (76): Deputy Hendry arrested Osbado Reyes 24 yrs of LQ for beating a twelve -year -old girl and an 18-yr. old man. Rafael Ruano arrested for beating 25-yr. old spouse, bruising to the arm. Booked Indio jail Christopher Douglas, unknown age, beat Juan Becerra in the Wal-Mart parking lot, then choked him until the victim passed out. Deputy Estrada said the suspect fled in a white Dodge pickup prior to his arrival. Saturday,11-16-02 (65): No significant activity 348 Sunday. 11-17-02 (49): Arrested Ronald Reed Lewis, 41, Indio for shoplift with prior at Wal-Mart, caught by security. He has prior for robbery. Booked at Indio Jail. Deputy Estrada arrested Victor Valdez (090180 ) for burglary. The owners of the house, located at the 54000 block of Avenida Vallejo arrived and found the suspect inside the house. The victim detained the suspect at gunpoint until Deputies arrived at the house. During the investigation it was determined that the suspect lives directly to the rear of the victim's house. He apparently made entry into the house via a front broken door. Once inside the house, the suspect handled some under clothing belonging to one of the females who resides at the house. The suspect claimed he was looking for a female who resided at the house. He was booked for burglary. Monday, 11-18-02 (60): No significant activity Tuesday,11-19-02 (49): Deputy Brooker arrested a 13-yr. old female student at La Quinta Middle School for possession of marijuana on school grounds. Deputy White arrested Robert Joseph Brown -AKA "Bo Dollar" 042284 of La Quinta for Possession of stolen property after he was found in possession of two stolen bicycles in the 53000 block of Avd. Bermudas, in La Quinta. Wednesday,11-20-02 (54)• No significant activity. Thursday, 11-21-02 (89): Nothing significant Friday,11-22-02 (56): At 0900 hours, Deputies Lee and Alfaro received an anonymous call of a wanted felon at the 78000 block of Miles. Upon arrival, they contacted Manuel Perez, 012268, who had an outstanding warrant for poss. of a controlled substance and poss. of paraphernalia. He was subsequently booked at Indio Jail. Saturday, 11-23-02 (81): Deputy McFadden arrested Mario Zamaripa, 23 years, of La Quinta for public intoxication on Sagebrush Ave. in La Quinta. Sunday,11-24-02 (61): While working the Robbery Prevention Program, Sgt. Purvis arrested Javier Hernandez, 39 yrs. of Indio for a terrorist threats warrant in La Quinta, and Georgina Catalan, 52 yrs. Indio transients for a willful harm or injury to a child and public intoxication warrant. Deputy Burbach arrested two shoplifters at the La Quinta Wal-Mart. The first subject was identified as Vicente Gomez (071777). The second subject was identified as Roberto Campos (042948) both subjects were cited and released. Minor injury traffic collision on Ave 52, east of Washington. Michael Portillo of La Quinta swerved and struck curb then lost control and collided with wall. His passenger Jesse Varela, Indio suffered minor facial injury from airbag. PCF appears to be inattention. 349 Jeremy Kashkari, 18, La Quinta, arrested for 488 PC. He skipped out of paying cab fare from Rancho Mirage to his residence. Monday, 11-25-02 (75): Deputies responded to La Quinta High School reference a man with a gun call. Security personnel at the school told school Resource Officer Deputy Morton that a male subject drove by in a small black vehicle and brandished a firearm at high school students. Deputy Morton conducted a felony vehicle stop on the vehicle, a black Toyota MR-2 on Dune Palms Rd. in front of the high school. The male sole occupant of the vehicle was identified by his Texas drivers license as Rocky Tutop, 20 yr. of Palm Desert. A loaded .22 cal H&R revolver (nine shot capacity) was found in the center console. Tutop said that he brandished it at the students because they were laughing at the condition of his vehicle. Tutop was booked at the Indio Jail for poss. of firearm on school grounds, removing a serial number from a firearm, carrying a concealed firearm, brandishing a firearm in threatening manner, and poss. of drug paraphernalia. Deputy Burbach arrested Angel Rodriguez (040372) for shoplifting at Wal-Mart. Tuesday, 11-26-02 (88): 1800 hours, Deputy Burbach responded to an anonymous report that a subject, John Maurice Bucklar DOB 022873, was at the 50000 block of Calle Paloma with an outstanding arrest warrant for poss. of a controlled substance. Burbach and Deputy Bolton took him into custody without incident. Wednesday, 11-27-02 (62): Dep. Ervin responded to a spousal abuse at the 53000 block of Ave. Cortez, La Quinta. Martin Angulo was transported to JFK with a head injury for an "OK" to book and later booked for spousal abuse. Melissa Beri was arrested and booked for assault with a deadly weapon. Thursday, 11-28-02 (63): Arrested Monica Louise Mayo, 092568, from the 78000 block of Miles Ave., La Quinta for terrorist threats against her live in boyfriend, Clark Aqir ( 031744). while Deputy Reynolds was walking Mayo to unit, she became verbally abuse and spat on CSO Fowler's pant leg. Booked in jail for terrorist threats and assault on a peace officer. Burglary and petty theft at the YMCA building, 49955 Park Avenue. Three scooters were stolen and recovered. Suspects also entered a storage shed located on south side of building. Friday, 11-29-02 (60): 1300 hrs., AOD CDF reference a blown transformer on a power pole located on the North side of HWY I I I west of Depot Drive. At the request of CDF, westbound traffic on HWY I I I between Jefferson and Depot Drive was diverted until Imperial Irrigation responded to repair the power pole. I responded to the scene. IPD, Cal Trans, LA Quinta City Road Dept.. Imperial irrigation responded and westbound traffic was opened up at 1410 hrs. Saturday,11-30-02 (52): Deputy Gaunt arrested Marcus Luna (092279) for battery on spouse in the 52000 block of Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta. Eric Gaytan, 25, La Quinta, arrested for assault on an officer. Michael Meraz, 21, arrested for DUI following single car collision on Ave 52, West of Washington. He took out palm tree in center median. Total calls for service: 1891 350 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT November 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Robert Brooker RSO Grant Funded Position School Session: November Vt through November HIGHLIGHTS: , 2002. I assisted the school staff with several incidents of, inappropriate behavior on school grounds. Including, counseling students that violated school rules, but were not violations of state law. I assisted the school staff with several students requiring medical aid. • I received information from an anonymous source of several LQMS students bragging about having shot trick -or -treaters with paintballs for the last two Halloweens. Since they had never been caught, they planed on doing it again. Using two first names, a nick -name and the teachers the three students shared, I identified three males, one of which I had previously contacted reference his interest in paintballing. I counseled all three and warned them of the consequences if any paintballing occurred. After Halloween night, there were no reports of paintball vandalism or trick -or -treaters having been shot. • I handled several CPS cross -reports, a fight on campus and arrested an 8h grade female student for possession of marijuana on school grounds. When I interviewed the arrestee, she told me whom she bought the marijuana from. I contacted that subject, she didn't have any on her, but she told me whom she got the marijuana from. I contacted the third subject who admitted providing the marijuana to the second subject, after finding it, and splitting the profit from selling it. The student who had the marijuana has been referred to YAT, and the other two students are up for expulsion from school for supplying marijuana at school. 351 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT November 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy Stephen Morton HIGHLIGHTS: • I arrested a man after he brandished a loaded firearm at several students. The man was also charged with possession of an altered weapon and possession of drug paraphernalia. • I conducted several truancy / business checks that resulted in five students receiving truancy citations. • One student was cited for possession of tobacco on campus. • Two arrests were for students fighting on school grounds. • I attended 'School Active Shooter' response training. • A student was arrested for committing a battery on school grounds and was referred to the YAT Team. • I conducted several parent / students meetings and counseled students on their behavior and academics. Actual reporting period covers October 29, 2002 through November 25, 2002 35? LA QUINTA POLICE MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY REPORT PROGRAM STATISTICS NOVEMBER 2002 Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams Speed Violations 168 Lane Change Violation ® Tows Fail to Yield Seat Belt Violations Injury T/C Turning Violations © DUI Arrests Non -Injury T/C Stop Sign Violations 17 Cut Traffic for Citation 59 Suspended DL Signal Light Violations ® Cut Traffic for Collision Non -Moving 14 Child Seat Violations E� Warnings 41 Fatal T/C 0 HIGHLIGHTS 110502 - Defensive tactics class at the Indio Station. (Manny) 110602 - Defensive tactics class at the Indio Station. (Dave) 110702 -Training at SBSO EVOC. (All) 110802 -Private property T/C at PGA West. (Dave) 111302 - Injury T/C at Adams n/of Hwy 111. PCF 22350 cvc. (Dave) 111302 - Riot training @ Tajmahal in Indio. (All) 111602 - Attended and received a MADD award. (Dave) 111902 -Motor training and equipment w/LA140. (All) 112002 - BMW training at PSPD. (All) 112702 - Misd. Warrant served. (Dave) 112902- Non injury T/C at Washington and Channel. PCF 21453(a) CVC. (Dave) 112902-11357(b) H&S. Recovered 22 grams of marijuana on a traffic stop. (Dave) La Quinta Police Department Special Enforcement Team Monthly Report November 2002 The following is a summary of the Special Enforcement Team activities for the month of November. Ongoing Investigations 1 Probation Searches 3 Parole Searches 0 Arrests/ Filings 4 Vehicle checks 7 Business Contacts 15 Investigation assists 2 Arrest Warrants Served 1 Arrest Warrants Attempted 2 Programs 2 Pedestrian Checks 35 Crime Prevention Hours 110 Bar Checks 0 Back-ups 4 Follow-ups 10 Search Warrants 0 Meetings 1 Recovered Stolen Property 1 Citations issued 0 Surveillance's 2 Property Checks 10 Civil Commitments 1 Bicycle Time 0 Training Hours 45 Illegal Drugs Seized 0.9 grams Total Mileage: 820 miles Noteworthy Accomplishments: - La Quinta SET arrested Raymond Palomino on a probation search for possession of methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia. - La Quinta SET arrested Julian Martinez, of Coachella, for a vehicle burglary that occurred at the La Quinta Inn. - La Quinta SET arrested Heriberto Toscano on a probation search for possession of methamphetamine. - La Quinta SET received training on defensive tactics, Mobile Field Force and Behavioral Analysis. - La Quinta SET gave a presentation at the Resort Communities Security Association meeting, explaining their functions and the concepts of community oriented policing. - La Quinta SET worked with the Cub Scouts of America, La Quinta chapter, providing them with identification kits and crime prevention tips. 354 Riverside County Sheriff's Department EXPLORER POST 503 PROGRAM REPORT November 2002 Training meetings were held on November 5, 12, and 19. The meetings covered outlaw biker presentation, building searches, defensive tactics, marching and formation training, Penal, 10 and 11 Codes test, and competition event practice. Sergeant William Sullivan gave the outlaw biker presentation. Crime Analyst Jennifer Richards conducted the tug-of- war training for the upcoming Colorado River Competition. Community Service Officer Andy Martinez and I handled the other training topics. Several Explorer Post 503 Explorers volunteered and assisted with parking at the November 9 Chiriaco Summit Veterans Day event. Sergeant William Sullivan hosted the Explorer Post 503 Barbecue event in Palm Desert on November 2. 355 CITY OF LA QUINTA OCTOBER CRIME COMPARISONS CR ME OCTOBER 2002 OCTOBER 2001 YTD (02) YTD (01) *HOMICIDE 0 1 3 2 *RAPE 1 0 7 12 SEX CRIMES (FEL) I 1 11 7 SEX CRIMES MISD 4 3 18 18 ROBBERY 2 0 17 11 ASSAULT (FEL) 6 7 91 89 ASSAULT MISD 20 32 136 201 BURGLARY 38 52 504 531 *VEHICLE THEFT 11 14 121 120 *THEFT (FEL) 16 23 261 204 THEFT MISD 37 44 417 399 VANDALISM MISD 33 25 343 253 DOM. VIOLENCE 6 13 107 125 NARCOTICS 19 11 105 106 DUI 4 10 116 114 T/C NON -INJURY 60 41 527 448 T/C INJURY 7 8 71 52 T/C FATAL I 1 2 4 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 714 286 4211 2912 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 357 z w ry N O O N 1..1.. W Wrn Q 0 U O w U) UZ 0 J Q 0 � o U Q W ry U N T— O O N N U U 00 ■ ❑ co � 'd M N O n e w w w c� D m J Q Q w m cc w 9 w a 9 358 z w CN C o G C) N N W m F— n C) O w Z QU) O ry w oa., U � 0 J � Ow 0. U w a Z 0 :D w C� } Q N r- O O N N 0 0 w _ i w w m LL J Q U) Q w co co cr LL_ N w w U X W N w a 313 z w ry w 0 w U J 0 O N W m O U O Z O F— co ``F- ^ vJ 0 Cw NG L.I. U LLLL W _co w LLoe 00 _ oi H 360 LO M N ' N � � r O co 00 N N N LO N N T- O LO LL S 0 w w J _U 2 w J w 0 J O S U J Q w O U J Q z w 0 w 0 361 z w o N V-- 0 0 N N U U 00 ■ I 0 0 0 0 0 0 L o U-) o LO N N r' T- 36 70 'cu VJ O 1 p In p 0 O N r' 363 z w N N T— O O N N F— F-- CU U Oo ■ 0 00 o co 00 N ti O O O N 00 (U Z z z U) Z 0 U LL LL 4 364 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / OCTOBER 2002 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME MINUTES NUMBER OF INCIDENTS EMERGENCY 5.2 4 ROUTINE 8.4 1027 *STATS TAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF DATA WAREHOUSE RESPONSE TIME REPORT COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Public Hearing on: 1) Certification of an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 99-389, and 2) Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2, for a 381-lot Subdivision on ± 127 Acres, Located at the Northwest Corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Applicant: Cornerstone Developers RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying the Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 99-389; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving a tract amendment for the subdivision of ± 127 acres into 381 lots, under Tentative Tract 29323. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Tentative Tract Map 29323 is located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street (Attachment 1), and was originally approved for 379 lots on 117 acres on February 15, 2000. A Specific Plan was also approved, which included reductions in development standards of the Zoning Code, pertaining to lot size and dimensions, setback requirements and lot coverage. Subsequent to this approval, the property was annexed to the City of La Quinta effective April 17, 2001. 366 The City Council approved Amendment #1 to TT 29323 on July 2, 2002 (Attachment 2). That amendment revised the layout of the project, reduced the residential lot count to 349 and increased lot sizes throughout the project area. Currently, the site is being watered preparatory to grading, and required studies are being completed. Project Proposal The applicant proposes to add 10 acres and 32 residential lots to the original 117 acre site, for a total of 381 residential lots. This additional acreage is the triangular property immediately east of this site, along Jefferson Street (Attachment 3). The east/west running streets have been extended into the added area. The access to Jefferson Street has been relocated, to align with Dunbar Drive, a future street on the east side of Jefferson. The general lot layout and sizes in the original area have not been changed. The proposed tract density is essentially the same, at 3.0 units/acre, as compared with the currently approved 2.98 units/acre. Two developers (Cornerstone Developers and Ponderosa Homes) have submitted unit types proposed for the lots, which have been recommended for approval by ALRC and approved by Planning Commission. Public Notice This proposal was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 6, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice. A comment letter was received on November 25, 2002, from the City of Indio (Attachment 4); no other written comments have been received. All correspondence received prior to the meeting will be presented to the City Council. Planning Commission The Planning Commission, at its November 26, 2002 meeting, recommended approval of the project applications to the City Council (Attachment 5). The Commission discussed the following issues: A. Comment letter received from the City of Indio, dated November 25, 2002. B. Extent of developer's responsibility for improvements, particularly with regard to the developer's responsibility for signalization costs at Dunbar Drive. C. The Planning Commission made minor technical modifications to the recommended approval conditions, related to grading parameters, vehicular stacking at entry off Fred Waring, and parkway storm water retention. At the public hearing, testimony was given by the developer and their representatives. No other parties presented testimony. 36" n62 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Findings necessary for approval of each application, in accordance with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, can be made as indicated in the respective Resolutions as attached. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying the Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 99-389; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving a tract amendment for the subdivision of ± 127 acres into 381 lots, under Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2; or, 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying the Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 99-389; and, Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving a tract amendment for the subdivision of ± 127 acres into 381 lots, under Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2; or, 3. Continue the Hearing to a date specific; or, 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully su)5mitted, ry Hetn' & nmunity Development Director o ed for sub s' y: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Approved TT 29323, Amendment #1 Map 3. Proposed TT 29323, Amendment #2 Map 4. Comment letter from City of Indio 5. Planning Commission Minutes; November 26, 2002 (4 pages) 361 0C'3 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389, FOR AN AMENDED SUBDIVISION OF 381 LOTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389 CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of December, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation from the Planning Commission on the adoption of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389, for Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of November, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council on adoption of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 15t' day of February, 2000, certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration as determined under Environmental Assessment 99-389, prepared for Specific Plan 99-040 and Tentative Tract 29323, as set forth in said Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, said Addendum complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director has conducted an Initial Study, and has determined that none of the circumstances set forth in Public Resources Code 21 166 have been shown to exist; and, WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was certified for EA 99-389, by Resolution No. 2000-12, prepared for SP 99-040 and TTM 29323, for Wade Ellis; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing held on December 171h, 2002 upon considering testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the La Quinta City Council did find the following facts to justify certification of said Addendum: 1. The Revised Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the Addendum prepared for the Revised Project did not identify any significant impacts beyond the existing project approval. 36.1 Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 99-389-Addendum Cornerstone Development Adopted: December 17, 2002 2. The Revised Project will not have the potential to achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals, as the addendum prepared for this Revised Project did not identify any significant impacts with regard to this issue. 3. The Revised Project will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as those impacts identified for geologic, water, air quality, biology, hydrology, noise, utility systems and cultural resources were addressed as part of prior environmental review, with no significant new or changed impacts being identified with the Revised Project. 4. The proposed Revised Project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the Addendum prepared for this Revised Project did not identify any significant impact with regard to the public health, safety, or general welfare. 5. The proposed Revised Project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan and Tentative Tract 29323. No significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 6. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 7. The Planning Commission and City Council have considered the Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389, and both bodies have determined that it reflects the independent judgement of the City. 8. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 9. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby affirm the environmental determination of the La Quinta 3 1 ouJ Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 99-389-Addendum Cornerstone Development Adopted: December 17, 2002 2. That it does hereby affirm the environmental determination of the La Quinta Planning Commission, thereby certifying the Addendum to EA 99-389 for Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 17t' day of December, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta 006 Environmental Checklist Form - EA 2002-461 1. Project Title: Cornerstone Development Tentative Tract 29323, Amended #2 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Wallace Nesbit 760-777-7069 4. Project Location: 127 acres on the Northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Cornerstone Development 5005 Calle San Raphael #B-1 Palm Springs, CA 92264 6. General Plan Designation: LDR (Low Density Residential) 7. Zoning: RL (Low Density Residential) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) An amendment to the existing approved tentative map, which would revise the project to include a 10 acre parcel and increase the density over the current approved map by 0.02 units/acre. The project would increase from 349 lots on 117 acres, to 381 lots on 127 acres. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) North: Existing LDR development (Bermuda Dunes) South: New LDR development (Monticello) East: Country Club development (City of Indio) West: Existing LDR development (Bermuda Dunes) 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eacklst389#2.wpd 007 ' 1 ' ♦ a Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and nothing further is required. ❑ Gu9.A-1 Signature Wallace Nesbit Printed Name November 4, 2002 Date Community Development w Department ®Q$ CAWrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eackist389#2.wpd 2 .1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must account for the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances) . Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance 3r4 009 CAW rkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eacklst389 #2. wpd 3 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): significant unless significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan MEA) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Site assessment) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Site assessment) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials/site assessment) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: (in determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use? (LQGP) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map; MEA) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs; MEA) II1. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, EA 99-389) b) - Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (1990 PM 10 SIP, EA 99-389) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEOA Handbook/PM10 SIP) X X l4 X X X X X X C:\Wrkgrp\Casedoc$\TT29323#2\eadocs\eacklst389#2.wpd 0 1 0", 4 Potentially Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Application materials/site analysis) X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Application materials) X IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,. policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (site bio assessment; James Cornett; 11 /14102) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (site bio assessment; James Cornett; 11/14102) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (MEA) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? IMEA, EIR) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (MEA, p• 5-2 ff; CVFTL HCP, EA 99-389) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: i3 a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (EA 99-389) X X X X VIA X 016 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eackist389#2.wpd D 11 5 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitiaated Impact Imnart b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (EA 99-389) X c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed delineation map, EA 99-389) X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Site history) X vl. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR ) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that could become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code 0 994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (MEA, General Plan EIR) C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eackist389#2.wpd 6 X X �X X X X X X e v 012 Potentially Issues land Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a1 Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Site/project assessment) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Site/project assessment) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Site/project assessment) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Site/project assessment) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Not applicable) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Not applicable) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ar adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuatior plan? (MEA, Le Quinta General Plan) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury o death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands an adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixes with wildlands? (EA 99-389; Site assessment) Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY : Would the project: X X X X X X i I X r I X a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board standards or waste discharge requirements? (MEA, General Plan) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan, EIR) �w X X 013 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT2 9 3 2 3 #2\eadocs\eackist389 #2. wpd 7 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site? (General Plan EIR) X d) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off -site? (General Plan EIR, Project drainage data) X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems to control? (EIR; Project drainage data) X f) Place housing within a 100-year flood plain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Not applicable) X g) Place within a 100-year flood plain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?. (General Plan MEA) X IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project/site assessment; Aerial data) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (MEA, CVFTL HCP) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (MEA) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (MEA) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (EIR, EA 99-389) X L4 X X P2 X 3071 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eacklst389#2.wpd 8 014 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant . Unless Significant No Imnwct Mitin.tad 1.....-... b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground - based vibration/noise levels? (EA 99-389) X c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (EA 99-389) X d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Not applicable) X e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (Not applicable) X XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, Project assessment) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Project assessment) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Project assessment) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA) Police protection? (General Plan MEA) Schools? (General Plan MEA) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Park Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA) CAWrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eacklst389#2. wpd 9 X X X n X X X X 330 015 Potentially Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks, or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of facilities would occur or be accelerated? (Project assessment) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Project assessment) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (EA 99-389) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Riverside County CMP; General Plan Circulation Element) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Not applicable) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Project assessment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Project assessment) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Project assessment) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project assessment, EA 96-328) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (CVWD, LQGP) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (CVWD, LQGP). c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (CVWD, LQGP) X X 14 X X X X X X X X C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eacklst389#2.wpd 016 10 Potentially Issues land Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (LQGP) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may X serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (LQGP MEA) X XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. 1/ M X Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. See attached Checklist Addendum. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 1 See attached Checklist Addendum. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\eackist389#2.wpd 017 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-461 : ADDENDUM TO CITY OF LA QUINTA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #99-389 PRIOR ADDENDUM UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #02-446 (CEQA GUIDELINE 15164) TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, AMENDED #2 Recommended by the La Quinta Planning Commission, for certification by the La Quinta City Council Planning Commission Resolution 2002-113 Adopted November 26, 2002 For City Council Action: December 17, 2002 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\adden389#2.wpd 383 018 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-461: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF LA QUINTA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #99-389 PRIOR ADDENDUM UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #02-446 (CEQA GUIDELINE 15164) TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, AMENDED #2 Recommended to the La Quinta City Council for approval by the La Quinta Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution 2002-113 Adopted November 26, 2002 384 019 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\adden389#2.wpd The City of La Quinta, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to the original Environmental Assessment #99-389, certified on February 15, 2000, by the La Quinta City Council for Wade Ellis. A prior Addendum was also certified on July 2, 2002, for the repeal of the original Specific plan and design modification to the original tract layout. The purpose of this Addendum is to document a modification of a portion of the project, which will be implemented through the following subdivision approval: TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, AMENDED #2 This case is referred to as "the Revised Project." All mitigation measures included in EA 99-389 and EA 02-446 are incorporated into this document by reference. The Revised Project consists of a 381 lot single family subdivision proposal, adding 10 acres, for a new project area of ± 127 acres, which would replace the existing approval for 349 lots on 117 acres. The original project area under the Specific Plan was approved for 379 lots, so the proposed revision essentially reduces the original density, as approved in 2000, from 3.24 to 3.0 units/acre. The City has determined that the Revised Project will be consistent with the intensity of development and character of the adjacent residential properties, and will be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan, as approved in March 2002. The Revised Project does not propose any change to the land use as approved in the prior actions. The currently approved map allows for 349 lots on 117 acres (2.98 units/acre). The approvals requested as part of the Revised Project are: 1) An amendment to the existing approved tentative map, which would revise the project to include a 10 acre parcel and increase the density over the current approved map by 0.02 units/acre. The City has compared the impacts identified in the Environmental Checklist prepared for the Revised Project with those impacts analyzed in the adopted EA 99-389 and finds as follows: 3�5 020 C:\W rkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\adden389#2. wpd Water - Impacts no greater than Air Quality - Impacts no Geology & Soils - previously analyzed. The Revised greater than previously Impacts no greater than Project will create drainage analyzed. The Coachella previously analyzed. The impacts similar to those Valley has in the past site is not located in any identified for the original been a non -attainment Earthquake Fault zones proposal under EA 99-389 and area for PM 10 as designated by the EA 02-446. As such, the map (particulate matter of 10 State but is mapped in provides for several smaller microns or smaller), and Ground Shaking Zone IV . retention areas, interconnected is currently in danger of meaning seismic events through a linear facility losing it's attainment can cause damage to traversing the site northwest to status. In order to building under certain southeast. control PM 10, the City occurrences. Impacts has imposed standards involving potential Biology - Impacts greater than and requirements on seismic activity also previously analyzed. The development to control relate to possible risk development of the Revised dust. This project will associated with upset of Project will result in a similar loss be required to comply hazardous substances of habitat for the Coachella with the PM 10 Fugitive (i.e. fuels and auto - Valley Fringe Toed Lizard Dust Control Plan related chemicals and (CVFTL). A bio study of the (FDCP) currently wastes) and potential for entire new site indicates a approved for the entire upset/explosion/fire. The significant loss of mesquite project area. project will be required hummock and CV Milk -Vetch to adhere to seismic habitat. A focused survey for reinforcement and other Giant Sand Treader Cricket still requirements as called must be undertaken. for by the UBC. Cultural Resources - Impacts no Noise - Impacts not Transportation/Traffic - greater than previously analyzed. significantly greater than Impacts similar to those The project proponent shall previously analyzed. previously analyzed. submit for review and approval , Development of the site Development of the a comprehensive Phase II will create construction Revised Project adds 2 archaeological investigation. An noise impacts of a short- lots to the original unit archaeological monitor shall be term nature. New long count of 379. A similar on site during any grubbing, term impacts relate to impact in generated traffic earth moving or excavation roadway noise by can be anticipated. activities. This is required addition of 10 acres mitigation as originally stipulated fronting on Jefferson in EA 99-389. Phase I shall be Street. A new/revised required for the additional 10 acoustic study will be acre site. required to address the effects of such noise on the Revised Project. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\adden389#2. wpd 336 021 The City finds that consideration of the Revised Project does not call for the preparation of a subsequent EA pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: 1) substantial changes to the project analyzed in the EA which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken, which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EA; or 3) new information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EA, or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. EA 99-389 and EA 02-446 have been incorporated with this addendum. A copy of the complete EA documents are attached. EARLIER ANALYSES USED 1. City of La Quinta General Plan; Adopted 3/20/02. 2. Environmental Assessment 99-389, certified 2/15/200 3. Environmental Assessment 02-446, certified 7/02/02 4. South Coast Air Quality Management District; CEQA Handbook, April 1993. 5. Final Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan; June 2002. 6. Biological Resources Assessment for Cornerstone; James W. Cornett, 11/14/02. 7. Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan; June 1985. 8. Riverside County Congestion Management Plan; 1992. ?S7 022 CAWrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323#2\eadocs\adden389#2.wpd PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation is recommended, based on the Revised Project review (final wording as included in the conditions of approval for the project may be subject to change). Mitigation measures adopted as part of prior analyses under this project are incorporated by reference, and are found in those analyses. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: A. The project proponent shall confer with the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) to assess measures for the offset of habitat loss to the Coachella Valley milk vetch plant species. Such offsets shall include consideration of a maintenance program of the species within the proposed project landscaping, along with a remedial hummock habitat, within protected areas of common area landscaping within the development. This shall be done during landscape plan preparation, with written findings/recommendations from USFWS to be submitted and incorporated with the project landscape plans as may.be appropriate. The plans as proposed shall be subject to review by the ALRC as part of the overall common area landscaping plans submitted for final approval. CULTURAL RESOURCES: A. A Phase I archaeological survey shall be required for the additional 10 acres along Jefferson Street. This may be done in conjunction with monitoring on the original site as required, but no grading on this portion. may commence until clearance has been given from the Community Development Department. NOISE: A. A revised acoustic analysis shall be prepared to include assessment of the impacts of roadway noise from Jefferson Street on the project residents. The revised report shall address the proposed site in its entirety, and shall be reviewed and accepted by Community Development prior to issuance of any building permits, other than for approved model units within a City -approved model complex. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323 #2\eadocs\adden389#2. wpd 83 023 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389, FOR AN AMENDED SUBDIVISION OF 349 LOTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389 CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 2nd day of July, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation from the Planning Commission on the adoption of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389, for Extension #1 of Tentative Tract 29323, Amended # 1; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 11 h day of June, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council on adoption of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 151' day of February, 2000, certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration as determined under Environmental Assessment 99-389, prepared for Specific Plan 99-040 and Tentative Tract 29323, as set forth in said Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, said Addendum complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as 'amended, Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director has conducted an Initial Study, and has determined that none of the circumstances set forth in Public Resources Code 21166 have been shown to exist; and, WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was certified for EA 99-389, by Resolution No. 2000-12, prepared for SP 99-040 and TTM 29323, for Wade Ellis; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing held on July 2nd, 2002 upon considering testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the La Quinta City Council did find the following facts to justify certification of said Addendum: 1. The Revised Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the Addendum prepared for the Revised Project did not identify any significant impacts beyond the existing project approval. 3g3 1 024 • Resolution No. 2002-105 Environmental Assessment 99-369-Addendum Comerstone Development Adopted: July 2. 2002 Pape 2 2. The Revised Project will not have the potential to achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals, as the addendum prepared for this Revised Project did not identify any significant impacts with regard to this issue. 3. The Revised Project will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as those impacts identified for geologic, water, air quality, biology, hydrology, noise, utility systems and cultural resources were addressed as part of prior environmental review, with no significant new impacts being identified with the Revised Project. 4. The proposed Revised Project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect human, either directly or indirectly, as the Addendum prepared for this Revised Project did not identify any significant impact with regard to the public health, safety, or general welfare. 5. The proposed Revised Project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan and Tentative Tract 29323. No significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 6. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 7. The Planning Commission and City Council have considered the Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389, and both bodies have determined that it reflects the independent judgement of the City. 8. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 9. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: .017 • • Resolution No. 2002-106 Environmental Assessment 99-389-Addendum Cornerstone Development Adopted: July 2. 2002 Pape 3 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby affirm the environmental determination of the La Quinta Planning Commission, thereby certifying the Addendum to EA 99-389 for Extension #1 of Tentative Tract 29323, Amended #1. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 2nd day of July, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Mayor Pro Tem Sniff NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Pena ABSTAIN: None STANLEY SNIFF, M, City of La Quinta, C ATTEST: JU REEK, CMC, y Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) 391 - 026 U 0 Resolution No. 2002-105 Environmental Assessment 99-389-Addendum Cornerstone Development Adopted: July 2. 2002 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 2THt-AINE JENS ,City Ail rney City of La Quinta, C6fffornia 027 • 1. 2. 0 4. Environmental Checklist Form - EA 2002-446 Project Title: Cornerstone Development Specific Plan 99-040 Tentative Tract 29323, Amended # 1 /Extension # 1 Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact Person and Phone Number: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Wallace Nesbit 760-777-7069 Project Location: 117 acres on the'Northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Washington Street. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Cornerstone Development 5005 Calle San Raphael #B-1 Palm Springs, CA 92264 6. General Plan Designation: LDR (Low Density Residential) 7. Zoning: RL (Low Density Residential) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Repeal of the approved Specific Plan design guidelines and development standards to allow revision of an existing tentative map approval. The tentative map is being extended, as a new map is not being filed in lieu of amending the existing map. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the prcjetYs surroundings.) North: Existing LDR development (Bermuda Dunes) South: New LDR development (Monticello) East: Country Club development (City of Indio) West: Existing LDR development (Bermuda Dunes) 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) P:\Wally\Casedocs\Current\TT29323\eadocs\eacklst389.wpd 1 333 028' • 1• Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Hazards & Hazardous Public Services Materials Agriculture Resources Hydrology and Water Quality Recreation Air Quality Land Use Planning Transportation/Traffic Biological Resources Mineral Resources Utilities and Service Systems Cultural Resources Noise Mandatory Findings Geology and Soils Population and Housing Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. a I find that the proposed -project MAY have a . significant effect on -the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and nothing further is required. Signature May 21. 2002 Date Wallace Nesbit Community Development Printed Name Department P:\Wally\casedocs\current\TT29323\eadocs\eackist389.wpd 2 _: 029 0 • are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" -answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must account for the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3, "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance ILA n 1 P:\Wally\CasedOCs\Current\TT29323\eaddcs\eacklst389.wpd 0 � 0 3 11l • • Potentially Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Less Than Significant union Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impac Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan MEA) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Site assessment) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Site assessment) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials/site assessment) AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use? (LQGP MEA) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map; MEA) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs; MEA) III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAOMD CEQA Handbook, EA 99-389) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (1990 PM10 SIP, EA 99-389) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook/PM 10 SIP) P:\Wally\Casedocs\Current\TT29323\eadocs\eackls1389.wpd 4 _ X X X X X X X 031 0 0 Issues land -c apporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Significant Less Then Sipnifkent Unless Significant No Inlaaft Mitict tsd 1.. 2-9 i.... d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Application materials/site analysis) X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Application materials) X IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (MEA) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (MEA, site assessment) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either Individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (MEA) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (MEA, EIR) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (MEA, P. 5-2 ff; CVFTL HCP, EA 99-389) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (EA 99-389) P:\Wally\Casedocs\Current\TT29323\eadocs\eacklst389.wpd 5 X X X X X X i� v 032 E E Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitlaated Imeiet I..._-- b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource (i.e.. an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (EA 99-389) X c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed delineation map) X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? . X r,r.v OUIL.7: wouia the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR) Ill Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR ) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that could become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code 0 994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (MEA, General Plan EIR) P:\Wally\Casedocs\Current\TT293 2 3\e adoc s\e 2cklst 38 9. wpd 6 J C7 033 Potentially Issues land Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would;the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Site/project assessment) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Site/project assessment) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Site/project assessment) d) Is the project located on a site which )s included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (She/project assessment) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Not applicable) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? INot applicable) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (MEA, La Quinta General Plan) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (EA.99-389; Site assessment) Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY : Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board standards or waste discharge requirements? (MEA, General Plan) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan, EIR) X X X X X X X X X y 93 PAWally\Ca3edocs\Current\TT29323\eadocs\eacklst389.wpd 7 034 0 IX. X. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site? (General Plan EIR) d) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off -site? (General Plan EIR. Project drainage data) el Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems to control? (EIR; Project drainage data) f) Place housing within a 100-year flood plain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Not applicable) g) Place within a 100-year flood plain structures which would Impede or redirect flood flows? (General Plan MEA) LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project/site assessment; Aerial data) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? IMEA, CVFTL HCP) MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource Classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (MEA) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (MEA) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: Potentially Potentially SignWC41M Less Then Significant Unless Significant No impact Wasted 1�.,.. ._. - V. X X X X X a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (EIR, EA 99-389) X P:1Waily%Casedocs%Current1TT293231eadocs%eackist389. wpd e 400 ,� 0355 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No •...... a mwogaiea Impact Impact b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground. based vibration/noise levels? IEA 99-389) X c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (EA 99-389) X d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Not applicable) X e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (Not applicable) X All. rvrIJLNIIvey ANU MOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, Project assessment) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Project assessment) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Project assessment) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA) Police protection? (General Plan MEA) Schools? (General Plan MEA) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Park Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA) P:\Wally\Casedocs\Current\TT29323\eadocs\eacklst389.wpd 9 X X X 401 - - 0 31, • • Potentially Issues land Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impac XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks, or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of facilities would occur or be accelerated? (Project assessment) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Project assessment) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (EA 99-3891 b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Riverside County CMP; General Plan Circulation Element) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Not applicable) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature le.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses le.g., farm equipment)? (Project assessment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Project assessment) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Project assessment) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project assessment, EA 96-328) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? ICVWD) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ICVWD). X X X X X X X X X X X P:\Wally\Casedocs\Current\TT29323\eadocs\eacklst389.wpd 10 001,17 • • c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (CVWD) X Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Slprdflcant less Than Significant Unlew Significant No ...-r-�. .a,aoasw Impact Impact d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (CVWD) X e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the proiect's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (CVWD comments) X f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (MEA, page 4-28) X Avn. MANDA I URY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environmen, substantially reduce habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause r' fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantaor: of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the protect have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the i:.cremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in ( onnection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)' d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. X X Q X Earlier analyses riay be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEGA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR .or negative -declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). in this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Not applicable. b) Impacts adegt:etely addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicr ble. P:\Wally\Casedocs\Curr:-nt\TT29323\eadocs\eacklst389.wpd 403 093 • • c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are `less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Checklist Addendum. P:1WellylCasedocslCurr nt1TT293231eadocsleackist389.wpd 12 404 .,� 033 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-446: ADDENDUM TO CITY OF LA QUINTA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #99-389 (CEQA GUIDELINE 15164) FOR REPEAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, EXTENSION #1 TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, AMENDED #1 As Certified by the City Council City Council Resolution. 2002-105 July 2, 2002 40� C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323# 1 \eadocs\adden389. wpd 0�0 The City of La Quinta, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Environmental Assessment #99-389, certified on February 15, 2000, by the La Quinta City Council for Wade Ellis. The purpose of this Addendum is to document a modification of a portion of the project, which will be implemented through the following land use approvals: REPEAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 TENTATIVE TRACT 29323,, EXTENSION #1 TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, AMENDED #1 These are collectively referred to as "the Revised Project." All mitigation measures included in EA 99-389 are incorporated into this document by reference. The Revised Project consists of a 349 lot single family subdivision proposal on Parcel ± 117 acres, which would replace the existing approval for 379 lots. The current approval includes a Specific Plan approval to allow reduced lot sizes and other development standard variations. The City has determined that the Revised Project will be consistent with the intensity of development and character of the adjacent residential properties, and will be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan, as approved by the City in March 2002. The Revised Project does not propose any significant change to the land uses as approved in Specific Plan 99-040. The Specific Plan currently allows for 379 lots (3.24 units/acre). The approvals requested as part of the Revised Project are: 1) Repeal of the existing Specific Plan to allow changes to the site layout, lot siting and design, and total unit count within the framework of the Zoning Code as currently existing; 2) An extension of time for the existing tentative map approval; 3) An amendment to the existing approved tentative map, which would revise the project to the degree that the originally approved Specific Plan is no longer required. The City has compared the impacts identified in the Environmental Checklist prepared for the Revised Project with those impacts analyzed in the adopted EA 99-389 and finds as follows: 4OP 60 041 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323# 1 \eadocs\adden389.wpd Water - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The Revised Project will create drainage impacts similar to those identified for the original proposal under EA 99-389. As such, the map provides for several smaller retention areas, interconnected through a linear facility traversing the site northwest to southeast. Biology - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The development of the Revised Project will result in a similar loss of habitat for the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard (CVFTL). However, this site is in an area approved for mitigation under an existing 10A permit, pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act. A focused survey for Giant Sand Treader Cricket must be undertaken. Cultural Resources - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The project proponent shall submit for review and approval , a comprehensive Phase II archaeological investigation. An archaeological monitor shall be on site during any grubbing, earth moving or excavation activities. Air Quality - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The Coachella Valley has in the past been a non -attainment area for PM10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller), and is currently in danger of losing it's attainment status. In order to control PM10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. This project will be required to comply with the PM10 Fugitive Dust Control Plan (FDCP) currently approved for the entire project area. Noise - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. Development of the site will create construction noise impacts of a short-term nature. Long term impacts relate to roadway noise. A revised acoustic study will be required to address the effects of such noise on the Revised Project. Geology & Soils - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The site is not located in any Earthquake Fault zones as designated by the State but is mapped in Ground Shaking Zone IV meaning seismic events can cause damage to building under certain occurrences. Impacts involving potential seismic activity also relate to possible risk associated with upset of hazardous substances (i.e. fuels and auto - related chemicals and wastes) and potential for upset/explosion/fire. The project will be required to adhere to seismic reinforcement and other requirements as called for by the UBC. Transportation/Traffic Impacts slightly less than those previously analyzed. Development of the Revised Project reduces overall unit count from 379 to 349 (8%). A corresponding reduction in generated traffic can be anticipated. 407 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323# 1 \eadocs\adden389. wpd 042 The City finds that consideration of the Revised Project does not call for the preparation of a subsequent EA pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: 1) substantial changes to the project analyzed in the EA which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken, which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EA; or 3) new information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EA, or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. EA 99-389 has been incorporated with this addendum. A copy of the complete EA document is attached. 408 043' CAWrkgrp\Casedocs\TT29323# 1 \eadocs\adden389. wpd Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Sand Harbor Specific Plan (SP 99-040) General Plan Amendment 99-064 Change of Zone 99-092 Tentative Tract 29323 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Christine di lorio 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Wade Ellis 41-865 Boardwalk, #212 Palm Desert, CA 92211 6. General Plan Designation: Riverside County: 2B, 2-5 units per acre Proposed La Quinta: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Riverside County: R-1/9,000 Proposed La Quinta: RL, Low Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Pre -annexation application to establish General Plan designation, Speck Plan and Tentative Tract Maps for vacant lands located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Specific Plan will establish standards for the development of 379 dwelling units on 117 acres. 9. Surrounding Lane Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. Lands to the north and west are developed single family residential neighborhoods. The Bermuda Dunes Golf Course is also located to the north. Lands to the south are vacant, and lands to the southwest are developed as single family dwellings. Lands to the east are partially developed with a golf course and single family residential. 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Local Agency Formation Commission 4^l 044 P:\CHRISTI\envir.cklist Sp 99.040.wpd 0 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning X Transportation/Circulation I Public Services Population and Housing X Biological Resources X Utilities and Service Systems X Geological Problems Energy and Mineral Aesthetics X Water Hazards Cultural Resources X Air Quality X Noise Recreation Mandatory Finds of Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a potentially significant impact or potentially significant unless mitigated." An - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that. remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon- the proposed project. Signature Date 410 Printed Name For 04J PACHRISThenvir.cklist sp 99-W-wpd • • Evaluation of Environmerital Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g• the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. See the sample question below. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 7) This is only a.suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. PACHRISTIknvirAlist sp 99-040.Wpd 411 0 0 3 Sample question: Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources • Potentially Significant Less Than ( P 9 �• Significant Unless Significant No impact Mitigated Impact Impact Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Landslides or mudslides? (1,6) X (Attached source list explains that 1 is the general plan, and 6 is a USGS topo map. This answer would probably not need further explanation.) I, LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (General X Plan Land Use Map) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies X adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-1 ff.) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (General X Plan Land Use Map, Aerial Photograph, Exhibit A of Specific Plan) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to X soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established X community (including a low-income or minority community)? (Aerial Photograph, Exhibit A of Specific Plan) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population X projections? (General Plan Master Environmental Assessment, p. 2-32 ff.) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly X (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension or major infrastructure)? (General Plan Goal 2-3, Objective 2-3.1) PACHRISTRenvir.cklist sp 99-040.wpd 0 • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (Aerial Photograph, Exhibit A of Specific Plan) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35) X b) Seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) X I I __j c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan X EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35 and page 4-30 ff.) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (General Plan EIR, page X 4-30 ff.) e) Landslides or mudflows? (General*Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) X f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions X from excavation, grading, or fill? (Southland Geotechnical, Geotechnical Investigation, June 24, 1999) g) Subsidence of the land? (Southland Geotechnical, Geotechnical Investigation, June 24, 1999) h) Expansive soils? (Southland Geotechnical, Geotechnical Investigation, June 24, 1999) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (General Plan, page 8-7) F I I I X IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (Specific Plan p. 19 ff., Tract Map 29323) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.3-1, page 4-53) X X P:\CHRISTI\envir.ckiist sp 99.040.wpd • 0 V. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface X water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Specific Plan document, p. 19 ff.) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (Specific Plan document, p. 19 ff.) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (General Plan EIR, page 4-51 ff.) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct X additions.or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (General Plan EIR, page 4-55 ff.) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (General X Plan EIR, page 4-55 ff.) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (General Plan EIR, page 4- X 57 ff.) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise X available for public water supplies? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 57 ff.) AIR QUALITY Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (General Plan EIR, page 4-171 ff.) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (General Plan EIR, page 4-171 ff.) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (General Plan MEA, page 5-33 ff.) I X d) Create objectionable odors? (Specific Plan project description) X P:\CHRISTI\cnvir.cklist sp 99-040•wpd 0 0 VI. VII. Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than I significant 'Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact impact TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (RKJK & Assoc., X Traffic Impact Analysis, November 23, 1999) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or X dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (RKJK & Assoc., Traffic Impact Analysis, November 23, 1999) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (Specific Plan Site Plan) d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? (Specific Plan, X p. 17) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (Specific X Plan, P. 17) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative X transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Specific Plan p. 17) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (General Plan MEA) X BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats X (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69, and page 4- 71 ff.) r --i b) Locally designated species (e:g., heritage trees)? (General X Plan EIR, Exhibit4.4-1, page 4-69, and page 4-71 ff.) 019 PACHRISTRenvir.cMist sp 99-040.wpd • • Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than -7 Significant 'Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, X coastal habitat, etc.)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4- 69, and page 4-71 ff.) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69) M== e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (General Plan EIR, X page 4-71 ff.) Vlll. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (General X Plan MEA, page 5-26 ff.) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient X manner? (General Plan MEA, page 5-26 ff.) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource X that would be of future value to the region and the residents of IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (Specific Plan Project Description) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or X emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA, page 6-27 ff.) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X (Specific Plan Project Description) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health X hazards? (Specific Plan Project Description) opt P:\CHRISTI\cnvir.cklist sp 99-040.wpd J s. • 9. X. XI. XII. Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than 7 Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or X trees? (Specific Plan Project Description) NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Douglas Eilar & Associates, Acoustical Analysis, August 5, 1999) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Douglas Eilar & X Associates, Acoustical Analysis, August 5, 1999) PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff.) b) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff.) c) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (General Plan MEA, pages 3-3, 4-7) e) Other governmental services? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 X ff. ) UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (General Plan MEA, page 4-26) X b) Communications systems? (General Plan MEA, page 4-29) X 417 0 5'2 PACHRI Menvir.cklist sp 99-040•wpd XIII. XIV. Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than 7 Issues and Supporting Information Sources): Significant Unless Significant No ( 9 Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24) e) Storm water drainage? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) f) Solid waste disposal? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) Iv g) Local or regional water supplies? (General Plan MEA, page X 4-20) AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (General Plan Exhibit X CIR-5) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Create light or glare? (Specific Plan p. 26) CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Paleontological Lakebed X Determination Study, Community Development Department) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Archaeological X Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) c) Affect historical resources? (Archaeological Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) 053 41. PACHRISMenvir.cMist Sp 99-040.wpd 0 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated , Impact Impact d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would X affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Archaeological Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential X impact area? (Archaeological Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or X other recreational facilities? (Specific Plan Project Description) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (General Plan, Exhibit PR-1) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare to endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directory or indirectly? PACHRISTIknvir.cklist Sp 99.040•wpd XVII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 4�0 055 PACHRISTIkmvirAlist sP 99-040.wpd i 11 Addendum to Environmental Checklist, EA 99-389 I. a) The proposed project is not currently within the, City's jurisdiction. The County General Plan designation, however, and that sought by the applicant as part of this application, are consistent. Differences between the two general plans relating to the intent of the land use designations are insignificant. Through the annexation process, the project will be assigned a City designation, which is compatible with existing development both under County and City jurisdiction. II. a) The proposed project is not currently within the City's jurisdiction, nor was it analyzed for future annexation in the existing General Plan. As such, the project area, and the 948t people it will generate at buildout were not previously analyzed by the City. However, the land use designation assigned this site by the County is compatible with the proposed land use designation, and the additional population would therefore have been analyzed under County plans. The project is not likely to significantly impact population projections for the region. Ill.a), b) 8r c) The City is located in a seismically active area. The proposed project is located in a Zone IV groundshaking zone. The project site is not within a liquefaction hazard area. The City has implemented provisions in the Uniform Building Code for seismically active areas. The project will be required to conform to these standards. A geotechnical investigation was performed for the proposed project'. It recommends specific foundation and soil compacting requirements which will mitigate the impacts of seismic activity. These mitigation measures will ensure that impact from seismic activity will be reduced to a level of insignificance. Ill.f), g) & h) The project falls within a blowsand hazard zone, and is composed of potentially unstable soils. Construction of the project will be subject to City Engineer review, the preparation of dust control plans, and the mitigation measures contained in the geotechnical study cited above. The recommendations contained in this study, and continued City review of the project, will reduce the potential impact from erosion of soils to a level of insignificance. All earth moving activities shall be coordinated to ensure that the mitigation measures contained under section XIV (Cultural Resources) of this addendum shall be properly implemented. IV.a) & b) The construction of structures on currently vacant lands will reduce the amount of land available for absorption of water into the ground, and has the potential to increase surface runoff. The City will require the retention of the 100 year 24 hour storm on -site, and the Tentative Tract Map has been prepared to reflect the "Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract 29323 La Ouinta, California, Southland Geotechnical, June 24, 1999. 4 0- non PACHRISTIknvirAlist Sp 99-040.wpd f P r,, ` 13 0 0 construction of a number of retention basins. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the project proponent shall submit hydrologic analysis to the City Engineer for review and approval which will demonstrate that the planned retention basins are sufficient to retain the 100 year storm. This will reduce the potential hazard associated with, increased runoff to a level of insignificance. V. a) The Coachella Valley is currently in a non -attainment area for PM10 (particles of 10 microns or less). The proposed project will result in 379. single family dwelling units. The primary long term air quality impact caused by these units will be from the operation of automobiles; short term impacts are also likely from construction activities. The proposed project shall implement the following mitigation measures to mitigate impacts to air quality. 1, Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Construction parking shall be configured to minimize traffic interference. 5. Construction of improvements on Fred Waring and Jefferson shalt be scheduled for off-peak traffic hours and shall minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. 6. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 7. The project shall submit a PM10 Plan to the City which includes adequate provisions for fugitive dust and wind erosion control, both during and after grading operations. The PM1 G Plan shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of any grading permit on the site. 8. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. g. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 4 4T PACHRISThenvir.cklist sp 99-040.wpd 14 • a 10. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed. 11. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. 12. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 13. Construction roads other than temporary access roads shall be paved as soon as possible, and once paved shall be cleaned after each work day. All unpaved roads shall be posted with a 15 mile per hour speed limit. 14. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 15. All buildings on the project site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. 16. The project proponent shall comply with all applicable SCAQMD Rules and Regulations. VI. a), b), d), & e) A traffic impact analysis was prepared for the proposed Specific Plan 2. The analysis -included existing conditions analysis, trip generation forecasts, and future traffic volumes. The total estimated traffic generation is estimated to be 3,627 daily trips, of which 284 are expected during the morning peak hour, and 382 during the evening peak houi. The improvements required with or without project implementation include the signalization of Jefferson Street at both Country Club Drive and Miles Avenue, and the widening of Fred Waring and Jefferson to their ultimate rights of way in the vicinity of the proposed project. The.traffic impact analysis includes the following mitigation measures, which shall be implemented as part of the development of the project site: 1. The project proponent shall improve both Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive, along their entire property boundary, to their ultimate 120 right of way (half width) in conjunction with the first phase of development. 2. Sight distances shall be reviewed to conform with City of La Quinta standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscaping and street improvement plans. "Tentative Tract Map No. 29323 Traffic Impact Analysis (revised)," RKJK & Associates, November 23, 1999. n � 55 PACHRISMenvir.cklist Sp 99-040.wpd _ • 13 3. The project proponent shall participate in the City's traffic mitigation fee program. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, and the planned improvements associated with the implementation of the City's General Plan, all project related roadways will operate within acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better) at project buildout. The project is therefore not expected to have a significant impact on the circulation system. The Specific Plan includes an interior trail system. The trail system interfaces with the interior street system at a number of locations. In order to ensure that no significant hazard occurs to pedestrians using the trail system, the project proponent shall be required to install stop signs and -crosswalks at all intersections between the trail and a paved roadway. The stop signs shall be for pedestrian traffic. VI I. a), b) & c) The site occurs within an area designated as potential habitat for the Giant Sand Treader Cricket in the General Plan. In conjunction with the first application for Site Development Permit; the project proponent shall submit a focused survey for Giant Sand Treader Cricket to the City for review and approval. The survey shall include mitigation measures, if necessary, and a mitigation monitoring program. The project also occurs in the mitigation fee area for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard. The project proponent shall be required to pay the fee in effect at the time of issuance of building permits to mitigate impacts to this species. Should the project, or any portion of the project, occur after implementation of the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan, any mitigation required by that plan shall be applied to the project, or any portion of the project. X. a) & b) A noise analysis was prepared, and subsequently amended, for the proposed project'. The project area lies in a currently impacted noise corridor. Residential dwelling units are considered sensitive noise receptors. The City's General Plan requires that exterior noise levels for any portion of a residential lot not exceed 60 dBA CNEL, and that interior noise levels not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. The study found that varying heights of walls were needed to mitigate exterior noise levels along Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. The study also recommended the elevation of certain pads to mitigate noise levels. Finally, the study requires the preparation of additional analysis to recommend mitigation measures for interior noise levels for any home to be constructed with a second story which has a full or partial view of either Fred Waring or Jefferson. In order to ensure that noise levels are mitigated to meet City standards, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 424 Of -I "Acoustical Analysis Report," Douglas Eilar & Associates, August 15 & November 29, 1999. PACHRISTRenvirAlist Sp 99-M.wpd 16 1 In conjunction with Site Development Permit application for any phase of development which includes homes with a partial or full view of Fred Waring or Jefferson, a noise analysis based on final pad elevations shall be prepared which demonstrates that both exterior and interior noise levels shall meet or exceed City standards. 2. The design and location of the outer perimeter wall shall conform to the recommendations of the November 29, 1999 amendment to the noise - analysis, and shall combine a six foot block or slumpstone wall, constructed to City standprd, with adequate berming to achieve the needed heights shown on the table labeled " Barrier and Berm Heights at Perimeter Lots to Achieve 60 CNEL." XI. a) - e) The proposed project is not expected to result in substantial adverse impacts to public services. The residences within the project will impact the school system, and such an impact must be mitigated through the imposition of school .fees. XII. a) - g) The proposed project is served by local utilities and water and sewer districts. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall be required to demonstrate, through "will serve" letters, that all services are available to the site. No significant impact to service providers is expected from this project. Xlll.a) The proposed project occurs along one of the City's Primary Image Corridors. The General Plan requires a setback of 20 feet, which the project has proposed on its map. The implementation of the setback requirement will lower the impact to scenic resources to a less than significant level. XIV. a) The site occurs above the recorded shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla, as mapped on City maps. No significant impact to paleontologic resources is expected from this project. XIV.b), c), & d) A site specific Phase I cultural resource study has been completed for the proposed projecC°. The study found a potentially significant sites within the project boundary. Site CA-RIV-6349 was found to be potentially significant, and necessitate further study. The following mitigation measure shall therefore be implemented: "An Archaeological Assessment of Tentative Tract 29323...," Archaeological Associates, August 31, 1999. 4, r) PAtHRISTIknvirAlist Sp 99-040.wpd 0 19 . . J �. In conjunction with the first Site Development Permit application for the project, the project proponent shall submit, for review and approval by the City, a comprehensive Phase II archaeological investigation, performed in conformance with City standards. The Phase II study shall include mitigation measures, and a mitigation monitoring plan. 2. An archaeological monitor shall be on site during any grubbing, earth moving or excavating activity. Should a resource be identified by the monitor, he or she shall be empowered to halt or redirect grading activities while the resource is properly identified and studied. The monitor shall file a report with the City of his or her findings, including disposition of any resource identified. 426 PACHRISTIIenvirAdist sp 99-040.wpd 18 .o _ 0 61 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TRACT AMENDMENT FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF ± 127 ACRES INTO 381 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS TENTATIVE TRACT 29323, AMENDMENT #2 CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of December, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation from the Planning Commission on a tract amendment for Tentative Tract 29323; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of November, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing at the request of Cornerstone Development to subdivide ± 127 acres into 381 single family residential lots and several lettered lots, generally located on the northwest corner of. Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as: PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 17, T5S, R7E, S.B.B.M. WHEREAS, at said Planning Commission public hearing, the Planning Commission did in fact recommend that the City Council approve said Tract Amendment for Tentative Tract Map 29323; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did confirm the following mandatory findings to approve said Tract Amendment for Tentative Tract Map 29323: Finding Number 1 - Consistency with CEQA The La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2002-461, an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389 for TT 29323, which was certified on February 15, 2000. Based on this Addendum, the Community Development Department has determined that none of the circumstances or conditions which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, have been shown to exist. Finding Number 2 - Consistency with the General Plan 4?7 ccresoTT29323A2.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 Cornerstone Development Adopted: December 17, 2002 The proposed Tentative Tract Map amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan with the implementation of Conditions of Approval to provide for adequate stormwater drainage, and other infrastructure improvements. The project is consistent with the residential land use designation of Low Density up to 4 dwelling units per acre, as set forth in the General Plan. Finding Number 3 - Consistency of Design and Improvements The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the City's General Plan, with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval to ensure proper street widths, perimeter walls, parking requirements, and timing of their construction. Finding Number 4 - Consistency of Public Easements As conditioned, the design of the subdivision and type of improvements, acquired for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision will not conflict with such easements. Finding Number 5 - Public Health and Safety The design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that this issue was considered in Environmental Assessment 99-389 and Subsequent Environmental Assessment 2002-461, in which no significant health or safety impacts were identified for the proposed Revised Project. Finding Number 6 - Suitability of Site The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the proposal as natural slopes do not exceed 20%, and there are no identified geological constraints on the property that would prevent development pursuant to the geotechnical study prepared for the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 4?S ccresoTT29323A2.wpd 063 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 Cornerstone Development Adopted: December 17, 2002 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required for Tentative Tract Map 29323, as set forth in Environmental Assessment 99- 389 and subsequent Addendums; 3. That it does hereby grant approval of Tentative Tract Map 29323, Amendment #2, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 17`h day of December, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta 429 ccresoTT29323A2.wpd 064 RESOLUTION 2002- EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 29323 - AMENDMENT #2 CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 17, 2002 1 1 /26/02 Planning Commission changes shown in legislative format GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. Approval of this Amended Tentative Tract 29323 hereby nullifies the approval for Specific Plan 99-040 (Sand Harbor), and said Specific Plan shall be void and of no further force or effect, upon City Council adoption of these conditions. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Myoma Dunes Water Agency • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency 410 coacc29323#2.wpd 0 [' 5 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES storm water discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Storm water Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 431 coacc29323#2.wpd 0 G. Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 6. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 7. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 8. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 9. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - The remainder of applicant's 60 foot half of a 120 foot right-of-way. 2) Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial): The remainder of applicant's 60 foot half of 120 foot right -of way, which may or may not be accepted by the Council pending the outcome of the future general Plan Amendment. The City has initiated a General Plan Amendment to upgrade Fred Waring Drive, from Primary to Major Arterial status, hence the requirement under A.2 above. 10. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 11. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for .private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Residential: "Looped" Streets - 40 foot width 43 2 (� coacc29323#2.wpd V 6 7 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 2) Residential: Non -Looped Streets - 37 foot width. B. CUL DE SACS 1) Public or Private: Use Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul De Sacs, or 800A for offset Cul De Sacs and a 38-foot face of curb radius. 12. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 13. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 14. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights - of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 15. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Said easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 16. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaped setbacks along all public rights -of - way as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-feet from the right-of-way/property line. B. Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial) - 20-feet from the right-of-way/property line. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, .remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g. sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 433 coacc29323#2.wpd 0619 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 18. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 20. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right-of- way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 21. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAPS 22. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster - image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer", "surveyor", and "architect", refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 434 coacc29323#2.wpd 0 C, 3 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 23. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 24. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berm design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical E. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal F. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 " = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of six inches of cover, except where there are slope ratios greater than 2:1, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. The "Site Utility" plan shall have signature blocks for the Building Official and the City Engineer. coacc29323#2.wpd 435 J Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 25. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 26. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 27. Prior to the conditional approval of any Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 28. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 29. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monuments. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the 43f coacc29323#2.wpd 7 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 30. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (1) construct certain off -site improvements, (2) construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others, (3) reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map, (4) secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others, or (5) to agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 31. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monuments, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also 437 coacc29323#2.wpd -0 72 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. GRADING 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 33. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 34. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 35. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. coacc29323#2.wpd 438 0473 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 36. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 37. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not be higher by more than one foot from the building pads in adjacent development except for the following lots which shall have the following pad elevations: Lot number Approved Pad Elevation 21 55.5 22 56.5 55.3 42 cc o 43 29 68.2 225 56.6 226 56.6 229 56.1 co 8 236 237 59. i_ 38. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 39. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot on the perimeter, or one foot on the interior, from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 40. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. coacc29323#2.wpd 439 0 7 4 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 41. This development shall comply with Chapter 8.11 (Flood Hazard Regulations), LQMC. If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation) are above the level of the project 0 00-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95% Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are so located, the applicant shall furnish elevation certifications, as required by FEMA, that the above conditions have been met. DRAINAGE 42. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, storm water falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 43. The applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24.120 (Drainage), sub -section "K.", LQMC. Storm water shall normally be retained in common retention basin(s) as shown on the Tentative Map. Individual lot basins or other retention concepts may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2 % acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is determined by the City Engineer to be impracticable. If individual lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet all individual lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 44. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rete shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 45. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the G313 4,10 coacc29323#2.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 46. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 47. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriff's Department), retention basins shall be visible from adjacent street(s). 48. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall not exceed six feet and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1. For retention basins on individual lots, retention depth shall not exceed two feet. 49. Stormwater may not be retained in any General Plan -required landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 50. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 51. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 52. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 53. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. .441 QP-,^ 4, u coacc29323#2.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 54. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 55. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 56. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 1 3.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 58. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 59. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 120 foot Right of Way: 44' Q,1 coacc29323#2.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development coacc29323#2.wpd Jefferson Street is scheduled to be improved as part of a City sponsored improvement project. The applicant shall reimburse the City for the cost of the outside 20 feet of improvements, including the curb and gutter. In addition to cash fees, the applicant shall construct the following: (a) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk along the project frontage. (b) Interim intersection improvements at the project entry as it connects to the existing Jefferson Street section, including required transition tapers and signing and striping. (c) The Applicant shall install a traffic signal at the project's main entry off Jefferson Street, at Dunbar Drive, when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50% of cost to design and install the traffic signal. 2) Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial) - 120 foot right-of-way. Widen the north side of the street along the project boundary to comply with the amended General Plan which may or may not be approved by the Council, pending on the outcome of the future General Plan Amendment. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk along the project frontage. (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from Jefferson Street to the westerly boundary of the Tentative Tract Map. (The landscape median improvements are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program.) 4 4-3 0"3 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development (c) Traffic signal Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Necessary modifications to accommodate the improved roadway sections. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Looped Streets - Construct full 40-foot wide improvements within the 40 -foot right -of way. 2) Non -Looped Streets - Construct full 36 foot wide improvements within a 37 foot right-of-way. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Private Cul-de-sacs shall be constructed to Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul-de-sacs and Standard 800A for offset Cul-de- sacs, and both shall be constructed with a 38-foot curb radius, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. 60. All gated entries shall provide for a three -car minium stacking capacity for inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -entry accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a "U" Turn back out onto Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive, from the gated entry. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents of alternate materials): coacc29323#2.wpd 444 079 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development Residential 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5"/6.50" 62. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Jefferson Street Entry (Located across Dunbar Drive): Full turn movement is allowed. Appropriate signing and marking shall be provided. The design of the median island and associated signing/striping shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. B. Fred Waring Drive (Located approximately 1,250 feet west of Jefferson Street): Left turn in, right turn in, right turn out. Left turn movements out are prohibited. The applicant shall design and construct the Fred Waring Drive median to facilitate the left turn in, only, turning movement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The median island on the Entry Street shall be designed to direct traffic to the right to facilitate a right turn only movement. Appropriate signing and striping shall be provided. The design of the median island and associated signing and striping shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 63. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 64. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 65. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 66. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries, within professional standards, to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 445 coacc29323#2.wpd r Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 67. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 68. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 69. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 70. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of Myoma Dunes Water Agency and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. Prior to Myoma Dunes Water Agency review, the applicant shall provide calculations that meet the requirements of Chapter 8.13 of the Municipal Code - Water Efficient Landscaping. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer 71. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 72. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as may be required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. 446 coacc29323#2.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 73. Specific fire protection requirements will be determined when final maps/building plans are submitted for review. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are submitted. A plan check fee must be paid to the Fire Department at the time building and water system plans are submitted. QUALITY ASSURANCE 74. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 75. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 76. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 77. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 78. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 79. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS S M coacc29323#2.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 80. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 81. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Art in Public Places program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 82. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 83. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the adopted Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The fee is $600.00 per acre. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 84. Building heights shall be limited to one story/22 feet around the perimeter of the tract, for a distance into the site of 150 feet. 85. Prior to submittal for building plan check, the developer shall update the acoustic analysis on file dated August 5, 1999 and prepared by Douglas Eilar and Associates. The revised acoustic analysis shall be prepared to include assessment of the impacts of roadway noise from Jefferson Street on the project residents. The analysis shall include consideration for limiting building height along Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive as specified under Condition 84, and shall address any revisions to sound barrier requirements and CNEL levels due to redesign of the tract map. The revised report shall address the proposed site in its entirety, and shall be reviewed and accepted by Community Development prior to issuance of any building permits, other than for approved model units within a City -approved model complex. 86. In conjunction with the first permit application on the site, the project proponent shall submit for review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, a comprehensive Phase II archaeological investigation, to be performed in conformance with City standards. The Phase II study shall include recommended mitigation measures and monitoring plan. • coacc29323#2.wpd 0 �� Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - RECOMMENDED December 17, 2002 - Cornerstone Development 87. A Phase I archaeological survey shall be required for the additional 10 acres along Jefferson Street. This may be done in conjunction with monitoring on the original site as required, but no grading on this portion may commence until clearance has been given from the Community Development Department. An archaeological monitor shall be on site during any grubbing, earth moving or excavation activities. Should a resource be identified by the monitor, he/she shall be empowered to halt or redirect grading activities while the resource is properly isolated. For identification and study. The monitor shall file a report with the City on his/her findings, including the disposition of any resource identified. 88. Prior to any grading activity, the developer shall undertake a focused survey to identify potential Giant Sand Treader Cricket habitat. The survey shall include mitigation measures and a monitoring plan, if necessary. The survey shall be submitted to the City for review and acceptance prior to a grading permit being issued, and any mitigation required by the City shall be in place. 89. The project proponent shall confer with the appropriate Federal and/or State wildlife a4ency(ies) to assess measures for the offset of habitat loss to the Coachella Valley milk vetch plant species. Such offsets shall include consideration of a maintenance program of the species within the proposed project landscaping, along with a remedial hummock habitat, within protected areas of common area landscaping within the development. This shall be done during landscape plan preparation, with written findings/recommendations from USFWS to be submitted and incorporated with the project landscape plans as may be appropriate. The plans as proposed shall be subject to review by the ALRC as part of the overall common area landscaping plans submitted for final approval. 443 coacc29323#2.wpd 0 1 ATTACHMENT #1 v~i 40TH AVENUE En rn oQuTgTf O c z�e 10 00 r I\ z 42ND AVENUE O z =DMA 3 FRED WARING DR gma Q j U L'a Z cr- it MILES AVE W 3 .04 7 SITE INDIO VICINITY MAP . N.T.S. CASE MAP CASE No. TT 29323, A M D #2 W cr- z 0 m NORTH SCALE: NTS 4 0 0 fil CURRENT APPROVAL AN ATTACHMENT #2 , 7 i ire'. �b ,a 0 QO7 PROPOSED AMENDMENT #2 ATTACHMENT #3 :D -vo ii Ot M-ico ItRe m III i jz MZ >s1 4n, o ,3 11 2••02 BiUAT 13:10 FAX 760 342 6556 CITY OF INDIO ATTACHMENT #4 IT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INDIO To: Wally Nesbit, Associate Planner From: Amir H. Modarressi, Deputy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer„; Date: November 25, 2002 Subject: Revised Tentative Tract Map 29323, NW corner of Fred Waring and Jefferson Street_ I have reviewed the subject tentative tract map and offer the following coYnments. l . Provide on site retention basin to retain the historical storm flow plus 100-year event storni water. The hydrology study should Include Instigation measures for bigger storm water events. 2. Provide mitigation traffic impacts for the following intersections and facilities. A. Jefferson/1-10lnterchange B. Indio Blvd./Jefferson Intersection C. Jefferson Street/Fred Waring Drive Intersection/Jefferson Street/Miles Avenue D. Jefferson Street/Westward Drive Intersection E. Jefferson Street/Hwy 11 I Intersection F. Jefferson Street/Esplanade Del Oro Intersection. The intersection shall have .full turning movements. G. Fred Waring Drive/Calle Esplanade 3. Maintain a ;minimum of 200 feet clearance at the northwest corder of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. The 200 feet shall be measured from center of the curb return perpendicular to the line having approximate bearing of North 45' East. 43033 11-25-62 13:10 RECEIVED FROM:767 342 6556 P•02 ATTACHMENT #5 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 6. Chairman Butler asked if there were any qu tions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked if the restr oms both have access from the outside of the building and if s , he assumes they would be controlled by access keys. Mr. Pr st stated the idea is to have fairly small offices and one co on restroom for the entire building instead of each office. 7. There being no further questions of tl,e applicant, Chairman Butler asked if there was any other publig, comment. 8. There being no further public p ticipation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation port' n of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission iscussion. 9. Commissioner Tyler quesiioned the need for the "gathering place". 10. Commissioner Rob21r:e s stated he did agree with idea as it does make for a nicer pl to work. 11. There being no Arther discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 02-112, approving Village Use Permit 2002-015, subject to a conditions as recommended: a. ndition #30: The gathering place shall be located on the fivesternmost parking stall in front of the building entry. ROLL CA : AYES: Commissioners Abels, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. Commissioner Kirk rejoined the Commission. Environmental Assessment 99-389 Addendum and Tentative Tract Ma 29323, Amendment #2; a request of Cornerstone Development for certification of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389 and consideration of a second amendment to the tract map to add ten acres and 32 residential lots to the original 117 acre site, located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. 1. Chairman Butler opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the 4) 4 information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2", G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioners asked staff to explain the letter received from the City of Indio. Staff stated the issues raised in their letter were vague and staff was unable to reach anyone from the City of Indio to obtain an explanation. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked staff if the developer on the east side of the street, which is in the City of Indio, is not required to pay his portion of the signal costs, would this developer be responsible for the full amount of the signal, and if the developer in Indio pays nothing, then this developer would pay nothing. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer responded that if the developer creates the impact there is an argument that supports the concept of the developer paying for 100% of the mitigation costs. Staff indicated they would review the condition for an opportunity to clarify the language. 4. Commissioner Robbins stated that since the east side is in the City of Indio, La Quinta cannot require that developer to pay their portion of the signal, and this developer would have to pay the entire cost for the signal. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked if the utility lines would be undergrounded. Staff stated they did not believe they would be. No response was received from HD. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Marvin Roos, Mainiero Smith and Associates, engineers for the project, stated they are happy with the redesign, but would prefer to have a right in-, right out rather than a signal. In addition, they would like to request that four lots be removed from the list of approved pad elevations. Lots 42, 43, 236, 237. 7. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked about the signal costs. 8. Mr. Allan Levin, representing Cornerstone, stated that in regard to the traffic signal, they would be willing to accept limited access instead of paying for the entire signal. The project across the street does not have any requirement to pay any portion of the signal and therefore, it puts the entire burden on them. In regard 455 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 to the issue on compatibility, Ponderosa has already been approved for their elevations. In order to approve the units for this development, Ponderosa withdrew their approval and both are before the Commission for review and approval. This way they would not be in violation of the compatibility requirement. In addition, staff has stipulated there can be nothing in the five yard setback. He would like to ask for some latitude for access and air conditioners, etc. 9. Mr. Joe Swain, Cornerstone Developers, stated that in regard to the Biology report there is reference to contacting Fish and Wildlife. Nothing was found in the study and US Fish and Wildlife has transferred the responsibility to Fish and Game who has said the only thing they would be concerned with would be the vegetation. They are working on a mitigation with them. 10. There being no further questions of the applicant, and no other public participation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 11. Commissioners discussed whether or not to require the signal or right -in, right -out. Staff recommended leaving the condition as written. 12. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-1 13, recommending certification of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 99-389, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-1 14 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 29323 Amendment #2, subject to the conditions as amended: a. Condition 37: Delete Lots 42, 43, 236, 237 b. Condition #59.A.1.: Change "reimbursement" to "cash fee" C. Condition #70: change CVWD to Myoma Dunes d. Condition #89: Appropriate wildlife agency 456 09-11 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. velopment Permit 2002-752; a request of Cornerstone Develop rs/Ponderosa Homes for consideration of a residential tract develop nt with seven single family prototypes with three facade treatment zich, and landscaping design plans for the property located on the nor west corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, within Tenta ive Tract 29323. 1. Chairma Butler asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a c py of which is on file in the Community Development Department 2. Chairman Bu er asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked the location of the models. Staff indicated their I cation on the site plan. 3. There being no fu her questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant wo Id like to address the Commission. Mr. Joe Swain, representing he applicant, gave an explanation of the models and their locat n. 4. Chairman Butler asked 'f there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked if the CC&R's would eliminate the parking of RV's on the street. Mr. Swain stated this would be included in the CC& 's. 5. There being no further question of the applicant and no other public participation, Chairman Butle closed the public participation portion and opened the matter up fo Commission discussion. 6. There being no further discussion, it was*oved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Minute Motion 2002-018, approving Site Development Permit 2002=,752, subject to the conditions as amended: G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 11 457 _ nJ� TWY� 4 44'PQ" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 17, 2002 Public Hearing on 1) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-459, 2) Specific Plan 87-01 1, Amendment No. 4, Design Guidelines and Development Standards for a 488,050 Square Foot Commercial Center, 3) Conditional Use Permit 2002-072 to Allow an Athletic Facility Use Over 5,000 Square Feet, 4) Tentative Parcel Map 30903, a Request to Subdivide 50.62 Acres Into Six Parcels and, 5) Site Development Permit 2002-751 to Allow Construction of Five Commercial Buildings Located on Property Bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street Applicant: Washington 1 1 1, LTD RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Environmental Assessment 2002- 459, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Specific Plan 87- 011, Amendment No. 4, Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, and Tentative Parcel Map 30903, and Site Development Permit 2002-751. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 87-01 1, Amendment No. 4, design guidelines and development standards for a 488,050 square foot commercial center. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, to allow an athletic facility use over 5,000 square feet, subject to conditions. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 30903, a subdivision of 50.62 acres into six parcels, subject to conditions. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2002-751 to allow construction of five commercial buildings, subject to conditions. i m 1, I ' 4 WIN None. None. The currently vacant portion of the proposed project site bounded by Highway 111, Washington Street, Adams Street, and Avenue 47 consists of 50.62 acres (Attachment 1). In addition, a 1.78 acre vacant site was previously approved for a two story office building and amended into the Washington Square Specific Plan. Also, within the Washington Square Specific Plan is Lowe's Home Improvement on 13.66 acres. In total, there are 66.06 aces within the Washington Square Specific Plan. The Washington Square Specific Plan was approved by the City in 1989 and amended in 1991, 1997, and 2001. The 1997 Amendment allowed a 13.39 acre portion of the site to be created and Eagle Hardware to be constructed (now Lowe's Home Improvement). In 2001, a third amendment added a 1.78 acre site into the Specific Plan which consisted of a proposal to construct a two story 25,240 square foot building with retail, office and wholesale uses. This Amendment addresses the remaining 50.62 acres. Surrounding Land Uses North: Regional Commercial (M/RC) South: Community Commercial (CC), High Density Residential (HDR), Low Density Residential (LDR) East: Regional Commercial (M/RC) West: Low Density Residential (LDR) Applicant Requests 1. Specific Plan The request is for approval of a commercial center consisting of twenty buildings with parking designed to service the major tenants and grouped building pads (Attachment 2). The project site will ultimately be broken into six development parcels. The uses proposed include retail, restaurants, fast food, office, bank, and athletic club. Each proposed building will require a site development permit and the proposed uses and sizes may change among the development pads at the time a site development review permit is processed subject to the total parking provided for the commercial center. A:\CC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd V � !s WASHINGTON SQUARE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE PLAN SUMMARY 1. Bank 2. Mixed Commercial Retail 3. Mixed Commercial Retail 4. Mixed Commercial Retail 5. Mixed Commercial Retail 6. Mixed Commercial Retail 7. Mixed Commercial Retail 8. Mixed Commercial Retail 9. Restaurants 10. Mixed Commercial Retail 11. Athletic Club, Mixed Commercial Retail 12. Mixed Commercial Retail 13. Mixed Commercial Retail/ General Professional Offices 14. Mixed Commercial Retail 15. Target 16. Mixed Commercial Retail 17. Mixed Commercial Retail 18. Mixed Commercial Retail 19. Mixed Commercial Retail 20. Drive-thru Restaurant TOTAL Proposed Building(s) Square Footage 5,000 39,000 12,500 6,500 9,500 21,000 14,500 24,000 16,000 9,000 64,000 20,000 17,000 5,500 125,400 43,000 40,000 6,200 6,000 3.250 488,050 The applicant intends to construct the project in phases. The phases will include site grading, parking lot, key driveway improvements, landscaping, and infrastructure improvements for each of the six parcels at the time building construction is ready to proceed. Site improvements for each building area are subject to the Site Development Review process. Access/Parking/Circulation Eleven driveways will provide access to the project. Nine new driveways are proposed as follows. • Along Highway 1 1 1, one new right -in and right -out driveway is proposed on Highway 1 1 1. Two driveways exist at the Lowe's Home Improvement, one of which is signalized, and one which is right -in and right -out. 4`0 AACC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd / rl V `_ J • Along Adams Street one new right -in and right -out driveway is proposed. • Along Washington Street two new right -in and right -out driveways are proposed. • Along Avenue 47, three new full turning movement driveways are proposed with one previously approved shared access on Avenue 47 via Specific Amendment No. 3. • Along Simon Drive, two new full turning movement driveways are proposed. La Quinta Center Drive is proposed to be the main driveway into the center dividing the site and allowing vehicles a southerly access point at Avenue 47(which is aligned with Caleo Bay). Numerous internal driveways provide easy and ample opportunity to the parking aisles. Interior parking lot aisles and access drives are provided throughout the site serving the future building pads. Proposed are 3,212 parking spaces based on a criteria of five spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of building. Development Standards With the exception of the proposed modifications listed below, project development standards meet Zoning Code requirements. Maximum structure height proposed is 40 feet; Zoning Code would allow 50 feet for the entire project. Maximum number of stories proposed is two; Zoning Code would allow three. The Specific Plan proposes to modify development three development standards for this project: 1) Building setbacks on Washington Street Proposed is a 20 foot building setback (a 10 foot reduction from Zoning Code requirement for building setbacks) on Washington Street. The project will meet Zoning Code requirements for all building and landscape setbacks on all other streets. 2) Image Corridor height restriction on a portion of Highway 111 The Specific Plan proposes a 26 foot height limit on Highway 111 (from Simon Drive easterly to the driveway at Lowe's) within the 150 foot Image Corridor. Washington Street and Highway 111 are General Plan designated Image Corridors. Zoning Code restricts building heights to 22 feet within 150 feet of Highway 111 and Washington Street. 461 A:\CC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd 3) Parking standards The Specific Plan proposes an overall parking ratio of one space per 200 gross square feet of building. Zoning Code parking requirements are one space per 200 gross square feet of building for retail uses under 50,000 square feet and one space per 250 gross square feet of building for retail uses over 50,000 square feet. The Specific Plan establishes 3,212 spaces for the proposed center. The total spaces will be utilized as a measure for total building square footage allowed on the site as the project develops. Architectural and Landscape Guidelines The proposed architectural design guidelines provide a framework for the architecture of all the buildings in the commercial center. The buildings are proposed to have flat roofs with simple and varied roof lines with deep set multi -paned windows. Exterior wall materials are to consist of smooth exterior plaster, concrete masonry units and tilt up concrete panels. Building masses will be accentuated by deep-set openings, reveals, inset detailing, and human scale features. Roof line will be varied, and building elevations will vary by the use of multiple parapet heights and setback screening elements. The Landscape Concept Plan provides a visual layout of street, building and parking lot landscaping with conceptual drawings and details of landscape treatment for a typical building elevation, entryways, parking and street frontages. Landscaping guidelines identify a pallette of plant material for shrubs, groundcover, and trees for Highway 1 1 1, Washington Street, parking lot(s) and buildings. Ground cover materials are to enhance the appearance of the project, protect soils from erosion and screen undesirable areas such as trash enclosures. Water efficient landscaping materials, including native plants, are suggested where possible. Exterior Parking Lot Lighting Plan The proposed exterior parking lot lighting plan is provided for the entire 50.62 acre site. Exterior lighting for the parking lot is proposed to consist of two pole heights. Located on Highway 111 are 98 parking lot light poles which are twenty-five feet high including a twenty-two and one-half foot pole with a 2 %z foot base (matching Lowe's Home Improvement parking lot pole standards). These poles are proposed to be located in Parcels 4, 5, and 6. Located on Washington Street frontage are 85 parking lot light poles which are twenty feet high including a seventeen and one-half foot pole with a 2 % foot base (matching La Quinta Court parking lot pole standards). These poles are proposed to be located in Parcels 1,2, and 3. All lights are high pressure sodium shoe boxes directed downward and illuminating all parking areas. 46' A:\CC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd 6 t. 2. Conditional Use Permit 2002-072 The applicant is also requesting approval of the required Conditional Use Permit for an athletic facility over 5,000 square feet. 3. Tentative Parcel Map 30903 Proposed is a subdivision of 50.62 acres to create six parcels from three existing lots with the new parcels ranging in size from 4.63 acres to 11 .80 acres (Attachment 3). 3. Site Development Permit The request is for approval of a Site Development Permit to construct five buildings (Attachment 4) within the first construction phase of the Commercial Center including: • Target, 126,000 square foot retail facility with a 10,000 square foot outdoor garden center; • Henry's Market and Big 5 Sporting Goods, 26,370 square food specialty market and a 10,000 square foot retail sporting goods store; • 15,900 square foot retail facility; • 19,100 square foot retail facility; and, • Washington Mutual Bank, 5,000 square foot facility. Site Plan A Site Plan for each building is provided which identifies the area to be constructed including building footprint, parking and circulation, and landscape planter areas. The current request and future site development permit requests are proposed to be constructed in phases. The applicant is proposing to phase improvements in the center by parcel as new buildings are ready for construction. The first phase will consist of the following: Parcel Proposed are two retail facilities, a 15,900 square foot retail facility with a drive through lane on the west side of the building; and a 19,100 square foot retail facility provided with 341 parking spaces which will take direct access from Washington Street. Parcel 4 Proposed is Henry's Market and Big 5 Sporting Goods, 26,370 square foot market and a 10,000 square foot retail sporting goods store, and Washington Mutual Bank, a 5,000 square foot facility with a drive through window providing 222 parking spaces which will take direct access from Simon Drive. 463 AACC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd uU6 Pr Proposed is Target, 126,000 square foot retail facility with a 10,000 square foot outdoor garden center providing 559 parking spaces which will take access from Highway 111 and Avenue 47. Architectural and Landscape Design The proposed architectural design guidelines are illustrative of a "Desert Deco" style which is described as "... an interpretation of contemporary, modern, and art deco architecture." All proposed buildings feature flat roofs, mellifluous colors, varied surface textures with rich facade colors and vibrant accent colors as an integral component of to the overall design approach. Building massing features deep-set openings, reveals, and inset detailing emphasizing shadow and light. Buildings utilize canted, staggered roof lines, anodized aluminum trellises, clear anodized aluminum store fronts, metal doors, fabric awnings, and stone veneer wainscoting. Maximum building heights proposed include: Building Heiaht Target 33 feet Henry's Market and Big 5 Sporting Goods 37 feet Washington Mutual Bank 26 feet Retail Shop 3 26 feet Retail Shop 4 29 feet The proposed landscape plan is consistent with the Specific Plan guidelines and palette of plant materials. The preliminary landscape plan consists of date and fan palm trees and shade trees. The ground cover and shrub plant material are low water consumption and native to the area. Landscaping surrounds the outside perimeter of the parking lot on all sides of each property. An eight -foot wide sidewalk is incorporated in the landscape easement meandering within the 50 foot landscape setback on Highway 111 extending along the entire length of Highway 111. The same landscape lighting bollards that exist at the Lowe's Home Improvement store are required to be installed. Planting materials conform to the City's Design Theme for Highway 111. Landscaping ratio coverages were submitted and contained errors. Landscaping within the parking areas are required to equal 5% of the net project area and non -parking area landscaping also requires 5% per Zoning Code Section 9.100.040; the project will be conditioned to meet these requirement. Public Notice The case was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 6, 2002. All property owners within 500-feet of the affected area were mailed a copy of the public notice as required. 464 AACC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd ►`! Lf J i Public Agency Review The Tentative Tract was sent out for comments to City Departments and affected public agencies on October 11, 2002. Agency comments received have been made a part of the Conditions of Approval. Environmental Assessment Based on California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, staff prepared Environmental Assessment (EA) 2002-459 for the project. Staff recommends certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC) Review The ALRC reviewed this request at its meeting of November 6, 2002. The Committee adopted Minute Motion 2002-041, recommending approval subject to conditions. Planning Commission Hearing The Planning Commission considered this request at its meeting of November 26, 2002 (Attachment 5). After a thorough discussion regarding the Conditions of Approval, the Planning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and voted (5-0) to recommend approval of this request, subject to conditions. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve the project can be made per the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and Zoning Code as noted in the attached Resolutions provided that the recommended conditions of approval are imposed. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Environmental Assessment 2002-459, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Specific Plan 87-01 1, Amendment No. 4, Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, and Tentative Parcel Map 30903, and Site Development Permit 2002-751 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 87-01 1, Amendment No. 4, design guidelines and development standards for a 488,050 square foot commercial center. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2002- 072, to allow an athletic facility use over 5,000 square feet, subject to conditions. 465 A:\CC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd u �.+ 3 Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 30903, a subdivision of 50.62 acres into six parcels, subject to conditions. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2002-751 to allow construction of five commercial buildings, subject to conditions; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Environmental Assessment 2002-459, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Specific Plan 87-01 1, Amendment No. 4, Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, and Tentative Parcel Map 30903, and Site Development Permit 2002-751. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 87-01 1, Amendment No. 4, design guidelines and development standards for a 488,050 square foot commercial center. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, to allow an athletic facility use over 5,000 square feet, subject to conditions. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 30903, a subdivision of 50.62 acres into six parcels, subject to conditions. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2002-751 to allow construction of five commercial buildings, subject to conditions; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Approved for Submission by: �/ ✓ A-ee� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 466 AACC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd fl Ut,'J Attachments: 1. Project Location Map 2. Specific Plan 87-01 1, Amendment No. 4 (City Council only) 3. Tentative Parcel Map 30903 (City Council only) 4. Plans and Elevations for five commercial buildings (City Council only) 5. Excerpts from the Planning Commission Minutes for November 26, 2002 AACC rpt. Washigton Park.wpd 467 it f RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (EA 2002-459) PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011 AMENDMENT NO. 4, PARCEL MAP 30903, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-072 CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-459 APPLICANT: WASHINGTON 111, LTD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta did on the 17th day of December, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request of Washington 1 1 1, LTD for approval of development plans including the distribution of land uses and development standards, for commercial and office uses by means of Specific Plan (SP) 2002-087-01 1 Amendment No.4, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002- 751, collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street, more particularly described as: A.P.N.'S 643-020-017, 643-020-018, 643-020-022, 643-020-023, and 643-090-016 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did on the 261h day of November, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request of Washington 111, LTD for approval of development plans including the distribution of land uses and development standards, for commercial and office uses by means of Specific Plan (SP) 2002-087-01 1 Amendment No.4, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002- 751 , collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1 , Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq., ("CEQA Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, the City mailed a Notice of Intention to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with Pubic Resources Code Section 21092 on November 15, 2002 to landowners within 500 feet of the Project Site and to all public entities entitled to notice under CEQA, which notice also included a notice of the public hearing date for the City Council on December 17, 2002; and 46� AACC RESO EA 2002-459.wpd U i Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-459 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City published a Notice of Intention to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Initial Study in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 6, 2002, and further caused the notice to be filed with the Riverside County Clerk in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, during the comment period, the City received no comment letters. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitations are true and correct and are adopted as the Findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's implementation procedures. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and finds that it adequately describes and addresses the environmental effects of the Project, and that, based upon the Initial Study, the comments received thereon, and the entire record of proceeding for this Project, there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that there may be significant adverse environmental effects as a result of the Project. The mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the Project and these measures mitigate any potential significant effect to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects will occur as a result of this Project. SECTION 3: The Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2002-459. SECTION 4: The Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number, or restrict the range of, rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history, or prehistory. SECTION 5: There is no evidence before the City that the Project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4G)� U A:1CC RESO EA 2002-459.wpd - 7 Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-459 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 Page 3 SECTION 6: The Project does not have the potential to achieve short- term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. SECTION 7: The Project will not result in impacts which are individually limited, or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the Project. SECTION 8: The Project will not have the environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. SECTION 9: The City Council has fully considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and the comments, if any, received thereon. SECTION 10: The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. SECTION 11: The location of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council decision is based is the La Quinta City Hall, Community Development Department, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, and the custodian of those records is Jerry Herman, Community Development Director. SECTION 12: A Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21081.6 in order to assure compliance with the mitigation measures during Project implementation. SECTION 13: Based upon the Initial Study and the entire record of proceedings, the Project has no potential for adverse effects on wildlife as that term is defined in Fish and Game Code § 71 1 .2. SECTION 14: The Planning Commission has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). SECTION 15: The Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for certification. 4 w 0 AACC RESO EA 2002-459.wpd �) y Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-459 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 Page 4 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-459 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, on file in the Community Development Department and attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of December, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 471 A:\CC RESO EA 2002-459.wpd Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-459 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 Page 5 4 7;' A:\CC RESO EA 2002-459.wpd (1 - 5 Environmental Checklist Form 1 . Project Title: Specific Plan 1987-01 1, Amendment No. 4, Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, Site Development Permit 2002-751, Tentative Parcel Map 30903 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Fred Baker, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: The south side of Highway 1 1 1, between Washington Street and Adams Street APN: 643-020-017, 018, 022, 023, 643-090-016 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Washington 1 1 1, Ltd. 7825 SE 76th Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 6. General Plan Designation: Regional Commercial 7. Zoning: Regional Commercial 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The Specific Plan Amendment establishes the design standards and guidelines for a multi -tenant, multi -building commercial center, including a 125,000 square foot Target store, retail, office and restaurant pads on 65 acres. The site already includes the Lowe's Hardware building. Total square footage proposed, including the existing Lowe's building, is 622,540 square feet. The Conditional Use Permit is required to allow a 25,000 to 35,000 square foot health club on the site. The Parcel Map will divide 50.2 acres of the site (not including the Lowe's building) into 6 parcels for conveyance and development. 473 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd n li-.0 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Regional Commercial South: Developing community commercial, Lake La Quinta West: Simon Motors, Regional Commercial East: La Quinta Auto Center 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coachella Valley Water District 474 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd 2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Determination Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. L41 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I -I I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature ate �- 4 75 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd l,) ' Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. g) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd 476 0 �3 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Site topography, Slope Study,Figure 5-4) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) H. AGRICULTURAL. RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map, Property Owner) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to nonagricultural use? (No ag. land in proximity to project site) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2002 PM 10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X // iN /1 X X X X 77 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd IV. LiVA e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ("Biological Resources Assessment..." Thomas Olsen Associates, August, 2002) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ("Biological Resources Assessment..." Thomas Olsen Associates, August, 2002) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ("Biological Resources Assessment..." Thomas Olsen Associates, August, 2002) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? ("Biological Resources Assessment..." Thomas Olsen Associates, August, 2002) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ("Biological Resources Assessment..." Thomas Olsen Associates, August, 2002) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ("Biological Resources Assessment..." Thomas Olsen Associates, August, 2002) CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey..." CRM Tech, August 2002) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? ("Archaeological Testing and Mitigation..." CRM Tech, October 2002) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 5.9) M== 94 09 X X X 91 /:/ X 478 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd r� 6 d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X formal cemeteries? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey..." CRM Tech, August 2002) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (MEA Exhibit 6.2) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan Exhibit 8.2) iv) Landslides? (General Plan Exhibit 8.3) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan Exhibit 8.4) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan Exhibit 8.1) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan Exhibit 8.1) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (General Plan Exhibit 8.1) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ("Phase I Environmental Site Assessment' Sladden Engineering, August 2002) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? ("Phase I Environmental Site Assessment' Sladden Engineering, August 2002) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ("Phase I Environmental Site Assessment' Sladden Engineering, August 2002) X X X X X X X X M X 91 KI 479 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChkist459.wpd r, � e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ("Preliminary Hydrology Report" Pardue, Cornwell & Associates, October, 2002) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? ("Preliminary Hydrology Report" Pardue, Cornwell & Associates, October, 2002) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? ("Preliminary Hydrology Report" Pardue, Cornwell & Associates, October, 2002) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? ("Preliminary Hydrology Report" Pardue, Cornwell & Associates, October, 2002) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) M /:/ X X X X X X X X IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) X 4S0 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd ' b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan p. 18 ff.) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment P. 74 ff.) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan p. 95) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Residential project -- no ground borne vibration) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR, p. III-144 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan land use map) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) /:/ X X KI X X X M X X Uff P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd XIII. XIV. XV. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? ("Traffic Impact Analysis" Urban Crossroads, October, 2002) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? ("Traffic Impact Analysis" Urban Crossroads, October, 2002) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ("Traffic Impact Analysis" Urban Crossroads, October, 2002) P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd 10 X X I ---.LXJ G:7 04 X X 4�? " e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Tentative Parcel Map 30903) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Tentative Parcel Map 30903) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ("Traffic Impact Analysis" Urban Crossroads, October, 2002) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? X X X X X X X X X X X M um P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd 11 `r' d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or X indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. None b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 2002. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 2002. General Plan EIR, City of La Quinta, 2002. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. City of La Quinta Municipal Code "Results of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Target Store..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, August, 2002. "Preliminary Hydrology Report for Concept Grading Plan," prepared by Pardue, Cornwell & Associates, October, 2002. "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report...," prepared by CRM Tech, August, 2002. "Archaeological Testing and Mitigation at a Portion of Site CA-RIV-150," prepared by CRM Tech, October, 2002. "Biological Resources Assessment & Flat -Tailed horned Lizard Focused Study..." prepared by Thomas Olsen Associates, August, 2002. 484 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\EAChklst459.wpd 12 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2002-459 a), b) & c) The proposed project is located within a General Plan Image Corridor on both Washington Street and Highway 1 1 1. The site is located in the center of the City's Regional Commercial land use district, and is surrounded by commercial development. The project proponent is requesting a height of 26 feet for a building within 150 of the right of way in the Specific Plan application. The building will not be excessive in height (only 4 feet above the stated maximum). The Specific Plan has been designed to provide visual relief by staggering building sites within the frontage on both Washington and Highway 1 1 1, and providing enhanced landscaping and building architecture. The project will reflect the high quality development which the General Plan encourages on both Washington and Highway 1 1 1. No scenic landmarks occur at or near the site. I. d) The project will generate light from parking lot lighting. The City's dark sky ordinance will be applied to all lighting plans submitted for the proposed project site. These requirements do not allow lighting to spill over to other properties, which will mitigate the potential impacts associated with the project. The potential impacts associated with light and glare are not expected to be significant. II. a)-c) The proposed project site is neither in a prime agricultural area, nor subject to Williamson Act contracts. III. a), b) & c) The primary source of air pollution in the City is the automobile. The Specific Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Parcel Map will result in the construction of 622,540 square feet of retail and office space, which will generate 10,904 trips at buildout'. Based on this trip generation, the proposed project will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 450.6 Daily Threshold* 550 17.33 92.43 -- 75 100 1.93 1.93 150 "City of La Quinta Target Development Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by urban Crossroads, October, 2002. 485 ()'3 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd 1 Based on 10,904 trips/day and average trip length of 8 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F, year 2005. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. The proposed project will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. The proposed project will also result in stationary source air quality emissions, from the power generated for commercial facilities at natural gas and electric generating facilities. The potential impacts of the 622,540 square feet of retail space is estimated in the two tables below. Emissions Associated with Natural Gas Consumption for Commercial Development at Project Buildout (Lbs. Der 10 6 Cu.Ft.) Estimated Total Monthly Natural Gas Usage: 1,805,366 cf/month Carbon Nitrogen Sulfur Reactive Pollutants _ Monoxide Oxides Oxides _Particulates Organic Gases 1.8-_------ 1.8 1.8 _ 1.8 1.8 Factor 20 120 ___ n_egligible 0.2 _ 5.3 Lbs./Month 36.1 216.6 _ negligible 0.4 9.6 Based on cf/square foot usage and emissions factors provided in Tables A9-12-A and A9-12-B, "CEQA Air Quality Handbook," prepared -by -south Coast Air Quality Management District, April 1993. Power Plant Emission Projections for Commercial Development at Project Buildout (Lbs. per 1,000 kwh) Estimated Total Annual Electric Use: 8,435,417 kwh/year Carbon Nitrogen Sulfur Reactive Pollutants Monoxide _ Oxides Oxides Particulates Organic Gases 8,435 8,435 8,435 8,435 8,435 Factor _ 0.2 1.15 0.12 0.04 0.01 Lbs./Year 1,687.1 9,700.7 1,012.3 337.4 84.4 Based on kwh/square foot usage and emissions factors provided in Tables A9-11-A and Table A9-11-B, "CEQA Air Quality Handbook," prepared by South Coast Air Quality Management District, April 1993. Assumes continued availability of natural gas in power plants and an average contribution from hydro -electric sources. Represents total pounds emitted per year by all commercial development at buildout. Based on these estimated impacts, the project will have the following cumulative air quality impacts. It is important to note that the potential impacts associated with power plant consumption are likely to occur outside the Coachella Valley, and will therefore not have a significant impact on the local 486 or regional air quality. P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd 2 Anticipated Cumulative Daily Project -Related Emissions Associated with Buildout of the Proposed General Plan (pounds per day) Total SCAQMD Stationary Moving Source Anticipated Threshold Source Emissions Emissions Emissions Criteria* _ Power Nat.Gas _ Vehicles Total lbs. Total lbs. Consumption at 50 mph Per day Per day _ Carbon Monoxide _Plants_ 4.6 1.2 450.6 456.43 550.00 Nitrogen Oxides 26.6 7.22 92.43 126.23 100.00 Sulfur Oxides 2.8 2.77 150.00 Particulates 0.9 0.01 3.86 4.80 150.00 ROCS 0.2 2.81 17.33 20.37 75.00 • Threshold criteria offered by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for assistance in determining the significance of air quality impacts. Source: "CEQA Air Quality Handbook," prepared by South Coast Air Quality Management District, April 1993. The proposed project is expected to exceed thresholds for only nitrogen oxides at buildout. This excedance will not occur within one air basin, since the power plant emissions will occur elsewhere. The project site was analysed within the context of the General Plan EIR in 2002, and falls within the analysis included in that document. At the time of adoption of the General Plan, the City found that although air quality impacts associated with buildout of the General Plan Land Use map was significant, a Statement of Overriding considerations was adopted, affirming that although the impacts associated with air quality were significant, the benefit associated with buildout of the General Plan outweighed the potential impacts. In order to help to reduce impacts associated with buildout of the proposed project, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. 1 . Any employer on the project site who has 100 or more total employees, regardless of shift, shall submit to the Community Development Department for review and approval, a Transportation Demand Management Plan, which includes incentives for carpooling and use of transit, such as preferred and shaded parking spaces for van and car pools, discounted bus passes, and bike racks for employees. The Plan shall include a description of the employee education program to be implemented. The Plan shall be implemented immediately upon occupancy of any building by any employer of 100 employees or more. III. c) & d) The construction of the proposed project will generate dust, which could impact residents both on and off site. The Coachella Valley is a severe non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The proposed project would result in the disturbance of up to 65 acres of land, 487 and the movement of 477,000 cubic yards of dirt on the site. Cut and fill is P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd 3 expected to be balanced. This has the potential to generate the following amount of fugitive dust. Calculations of Fugitive Dust Potential Total Acres to be Factor Total Potential Dust Disturbed at Buildout* (lbs./day/acre) Generation (lbs./day) 65 26.4 1716 Source: Table A9-9, "CEQA —Air Qua— ity Handbook," prepared by SouthCoast Air Quality Management District, April 1993. The Valley has recently adopted stricter measures for the control of PM 10. These measures will be integrated into conditions of approval for the proposed project. These include the following control measures. CONTROL MEASURE TITLE & CONTROL METHOD BCM-1 Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities: Watering, chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control BCM-2 Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access restriction, revegetation BCM-3 Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical stabilization, access restriction, revegetation BCM-4 Paved Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road shoulders, clean streets maintenance The contractors of all buildings on the site will be required to submit a PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on- going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 488 7. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd 4 wind erosion. Slope stabilizing landscaping shall be installed immediately upon completion of grading of said slopes. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 9. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 10. An air quality monitor shall be on site during all grading and earth moving activities. The monitor shall be empowered to employ all necessary BCMs to lower the amount of dust generated on the project site. 11. The project proponent shall submit the PM 10 Management Plan to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review prior to issuance of grading permits. 12. The project proponent shall conform to the notification standards included in the 2002 SIP for PM 10 in the Coachella Valley. III. e) The construction of the proposed project will not generate any objectionable odors. IV) a)-f) A biological resource analysis was prepared for the proposed project'. The survey found that the project site is suitable habitat for a number of species, but only Palm Springs ground Squirrel was identified. The project site is also potential habitat for both the Coachella Valley milk vetch and the Giant sand treader cricket. In addition, 5 acres of mesquite hummocks are currently located on the site. This plant community can support all the sensitive species potentially or actually located on the project site. The City has instituted a mitigation measure for the impacts associated with disturbance of mesquite hummocks, which will apply to the project site. In addition, the proposed project occurs within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard HCP, and will be subject to the fee requirements associated with this document. In order to assure that impacts to biological resources are reduced to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. Prior to construction or site preparation activities, the project developer shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with CDFG and an appropriate non- profit organization whose purpose is to acquire and manage land for the purpose of protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU shall provide the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage 10 acres of mesquite hummock habitat in the Willow Hole area. 2. The project proponent shall pay the required fee under the Coachella Valley fringe - toed lizard HCP prior to the issuance of grading permits for any portion of the site. 2 "Biological Resources Assessment and Flat -Tailed Horned Lizard Focused Study...," prepared by Thomas 489 Olsen Associates, August, 2002. P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd V. a)-d) Phase I and II cultural resources surveys were completed for the proposed project3. The Phase I survey identified potentially significant resources on the site, which were investigated as part of the testing program. The testing program identified materials which are being investigated in the laboratory, and curated according to City and professional standards. The studies made recommendations for mitigation measures which were confirmed by the Historic Preservation Commission, as follows: 1. An archaeologist shall be present on and off site during all grubbing and earth moving activities. The archaeologist shall be required to submit to the Community Development Department, for review and approval, a written report on all activities on the site prior to occupancy of the first building on the site. 2. The final report documenting the results of the artifact analysis and overall interpretation of the locus shall be submitted to Community Development Department for approval by the historical Preservation Commission prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit for the project. VI. a) i)-iv) The project site lies in a Zone IV groundshaking zone. The site is not located within an Alquist Priolo Study Zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. Structures on the site will be required to meet the City's and the State's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. These requirement will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. The site is not in an area subject to liquefaction or landslides VI. b) The site is located in a severe blowsand hazard area, and will therefore be subject to significant soil erosion from wind. The project proponent will be required to implement the mitigation measures listed under air quality, above, to guard against soil erosion due to wind. These mitigation measures will lower the potential impacts associated with wind erosion to a less than significant level. VI. c)-e) The soils on the site are not expansive, and will support the development proposed by the project proponent. The project proponent will be required to submit a site -specific geotechnical study at the time of building permit issuance to assure that all building techniques employed on the site result in safe structures. These standards will lower the potential impacts to a less than significant level. VII. a)-h) A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared for the proposed project4. The "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey... "' and Archaeological Testing and Mitigation at a Portion of Site CA-RIV-150..." prepared by CRM Tech, August and October, 2002. 490 "Phase I Environmental Site Assessment..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, August, 2002. r; '1 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd investigation found that the site was not affected by use or storage of hazardous substances. For any commercial use which uses or stores hazardous materials at project buildout, fire department and health department standards shall apply which are designed to mitigate the potential impacts associated with such use or storage. The impacts associated with hazardous materials are expected to be less than significant. VIII. a), c),d) & e) The proposed project will be responsible for the drainage of on and off site flows. A preliminary hydrology study has been prepared for the project sites The preliminary hydrology study prepared for the proposed project is still under review by the City Engineer, and will be modified to conform to the City's standards for on -site retention. In order to assure that this is the case, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. The project proponent shall secure approval from the City Engineer of the hydrology study for the project site prior to the issuance of any grading permit. VIII. b) The Coachella Valley Water District provides domestic water to the subject property. The retail development on the project site will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts to groundwater. The proposed project will also meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. IX. a)-c) The project site is currently vacant, and will be developed for its General Plan designation of Regional Commercial. The project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site. The project will not divide an existing community, or conflict with a land use plan or with a habitat or natural community conservation plan. X.a) & b) The project site occurs outside the MRZ-2 Zone, and is not expected to contain resources. XI. a) The project site is located in an area of the City subject to high traffic noise levels. The project will develop as retail commercial development, which is not a sensitive receptor. The closest sensitive receptors are located to the south of the project site, in the Lake La Quinta project site. The project site plan includes parkway landscaping and parking lot setbacks which will increase the separation between the commercial land use and the residential units to the south. The impacts associated with operational noise are not expected to be significant. XI. c) The construction of the project will generate noise from construction equipment and activities. Existing homes occur to the south of the site. Homes are considered sensitive receptors to noise, and the construction at the site could have a short term negative impact. In order to reduce these potential impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 491. ( r, A "Preliminary Hydrology Study," prepared by Pardue, Cornwell & Associates, October, 2002. ) .� d P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd 1. All internal combustion equipment operating within 500 feet of any occupied residential unit shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationary construction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) shall be located in the northwestern half of the site, as far away from existing homes as possible. 3. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. XI. d) & e) The project site is not within the vicinity of an airport or airstrip. XII. a)-c) The project site is currently vacant, and will result in the construction of commercial development. No impacts to population and housing are expected. XIII. a) Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate property and sales tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. The commercial development will be required to pay the state -mandated school fees to mitigate potential impacts to schools. To offset the potential impacts on City traffic systems, the project or its components will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. XIV. a) & b) The construction of commercial development will not impact recreational services. The generation of property and sales tax, and the General Plan policies in place to ensure that standards for parkland acquisition are followed by the City as development occurs, will mitigate potential impacts to these facilities to a less than significant level. XV. a) & b) A traffic impact report was prepared for the proposed project'. The study found that the proposed project will generate 14,539 trips per day, but that 25% of these trips will be pass - by trips which would otherwise occur were the project not constructed. The study further found that traffic signal warrants exist at Adams and 47th Street, and that modification of the traffic signal operation at Washington and Highway I I I to provide a right turn overlap phase 6 A "City of La Quinta Target Development Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by Urban Crossroads, 4 9 October, 2002. j P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd is required without the project. With the project, several improvements are required to mitigate the potential impacts associated with the buildout of the project. These mitigation measures are: Construct Washington Street from Simon Drive to Avenue 47 at its ultimate half - section width as an augmented major arterial in conjunction with the development. 2. Construct Adams Street from Highway 111 to Avenue 47 at its ultimate half -section width as a secondary arterial in conjunction with the development. 3. Construct Highway 111 from Simon Drive to Adams Street at its ultimate half - section width as a special class of major arterial with a right-of-way requirement of 172 feet established by Caltrans. 4. Construct Avenue 47 from Washington Street to Adams Street at its ultimate half - section width as a collector in conjunction with development. 5. Project driveways #1 and #4 shall be restricted to right turns only. 6. Project driveways #5 and #6 shall be full access driveways. 7. Project driveway #2 shall be restricted to right turn in/right turn out/left turn in. 8. Construct a 150 foot left turn in pocket for driveway #2 on Washington Street. 9. All improvements shall be completed in conformance to exhibit 7-A of the October 2002 Traffic Impact Analysis. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts associated with traffic generated at the site will be reduced to a less than significant level. XV. c)-g) The project will not impact air patterns. The design of the site does not create any hazardous design features. The Specific Plan and site plan include parking requirements generally in conformance to the City's standards. The site plan provides for a number of emergency access points. Alternative transportation in the form of bus stops will be implemented throughout the area based on General Plan policies and programs. XVI. a)-f) Utilities are available at the project site. The project developer will be required to pay connection and service fees for each of the utilities, which are designed to incorporate future needs and facilities. These fees will eliminate the potential impacts associated with utilities at the site. 493 P:\FRED\WashingtonPark\Addendum459.wpd 0 0 rn 0 c%1 cn N O N N O 00 0 0 0 N 0 M It 110 c .. N O\ o Cl) o m o U N c,3" l� o 00 i �zop� a� N b 0 '� %/ V1 N O O N i t O °z x U A U W d -0 Q. 3 ai d N O c 0 a� Y N a 0 rn 49 6 LU r .7 a: C ai_0 mo a) aa) c c a f° cn a: C° U) O co N o rn 0 0 c 0 t O z O U N U co +, +, �, � p 0 Q a) a N a) "O W p co j�Ua Q co �Ua _a C� C Co � O U) ° c cn c odN >• pN >• E0-`da cn C o a) aQOT a02 j V (n (n V (n p = o co d a Q ++ f- (n �_ to a U O co Q (n N > U O co (n N 7 4- O (n }' `~ O0 o �O O C O C O E 0 a) C C U a) U a) O U U O p p C +�'_ 2 v +� (n o) E E "' m E (n E •`� E y U) -C s O U C U N CL U) U) a +_ U V co a) cc a) 0 Co ++ a +, U o +r rn C +, U o ++ V) o C +� 0) +, C U +� U o m O O a) N O =p 'co a) (� O a) O C C ` U a 0 O CL 2 a co rn a .� 0- .0 a rn d CL a O Q O Q 41 a) () a O C 0 C C C C a) E () E a) E } ( a) E +, > 0 > 0 C ►- 0 C p a� a) co a Q co a co a 0 a co a O a 41 c a) a) a) +, C a) a) O N 0 E °� o c c Q E a Q a E ccoo c cE cm E c U U _ o () O += +' O O a) O O O U p U U U m U Q m m 4. m a. (n a) a) >. o o C p — a CD E +, +, N ° aEi o vi o o O 0 d Q a) p cn y �N U c a tI) O O cO O C N ; O C y Q 4) O o O N@ O c > a = 'E Q. a FL U N c o c 0 mr-a O g° rn Q U E a a) 4- _0 a f� O cp '�+ +o c o c' Q � O C cc O mN N a "0 co -CC ,►_v co > O_ C C +, > ol w 3 p CO a a U) +J O (n Q a) a v n 3 a; N O c 0 orn i Y a c 0 F 4 9� 0 LU LU k k � vm Um 0m ku L ui he 2LU 2LU 2LU _ L) S_ � �� Q � 2 E t CD § \ R .ui Q v ƒ 20 § v 2 0 o ui,S in U > 2 O c2t CO @ CL CL o 2 & a « c ® 2 \ OL 2 § E 2 o c E iE5c 5 �_ � �_ e � % / ® ® / @ 3 % o § c .§ § f c o CL 4� § cc E LL. z oLLJ L2 C L2 k 0 _C > E m k > S2 B ■ k ■ L ° f E E§ IL 2 �2 / .a g p E§ > .c (D EE 0 § C w E 2 w � E w 'o E" E E t 3 m 7 CL @ CD 3 k k 3 Q § 0 uj$ L) o § 0 $_ E 0 /cu 2 (aee > CA � 0 Cl) oCL �_ 2 2 § f c E c ■ 2 ) ) 2 LU§ M 2 § c o 0 w E .g w o `k K 0a 6 K �2 K -i L7 U f 0 = ocn / q LL o q & ® o E U CDc %Dg X L-0 m : [ Q > Q £ .§ > � . o -0 > z a « 2 k > U)-C 496 \\� CL C p C) m V m Q W Q W a cYj IL W M W V V U V a a m o o O F o 0 0 0 0 a) O a) a) O O a) a) a a a a a a a a U) C 0 c U) c to c U) c N C U) c U) c c O c O c O +�+ 4� L L) c!)0 c 3 3 z ? z c c c c c y y 2 C O c c 2 C O C F c c c �:. U a) V O U a) V a) U a) U U U 7 a O a 7 a 7 a O a 'E O 'E O C O C O C O C c c �- �- 0 > C U > c -O V > V > .a V > c -0 0 0 a o im C) LL LL Z C C C W Z C C C C C LU m 0 E E E 0 E E E E E N H m N ~ co co ca co co co co co O 0 a) a) a) 0 0 a) () a) a) a) �� 0 0 0 yg 0 0 0 0 0 W O) O) W CD O) O) O) 0) cc C c_ c cc c_ c c _c c_ "O "O 'O .5 m m m m m m m m CD U a; 4L co E + Z a Z E L .7 50 Q N c7 m N W +1 O +1 a) v- O W H a 00 O ) c0 co _ C co ) m E O Q 4-H } Q c O E } Q C '~ O �' 0 co CO 4— � O a) � O O a +' OC W -C cc W -C +� E � +� c +r O U n3 cm 'a 0 tm > cm X CD U� V+ U U to o oco c O C Q V +�+ ++1 0 y j c E O O E o a) t i c o m C -0 O c 4- o m c.4 O 7 C O O O L x (7-C Jr LL x Ur U UL UL +3 U N V) 2 Y a c 0 rn c t 0 491 w w LL RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A 66.06 ACRE COMMERCIAL CENTER CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011 AMENDMENT NO. 4 APPLICANT: WASHINGTON 111, LTD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of December, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of Washington 1 1 1, LTD for approval of guidelines and standards in a development plan including the distribution of land uses and development standards, for commercial and office uses by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087-01 1, Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751, collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street, more particularly described as : A.P.N.'S 643-020-017, 643-020-018, 643-020-022, 643-020-023, and 643-090-016 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26T" day of November, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of Washington 111, LTD for approval of guidelines and standards in a development plan including the distribution of land uses and development standards, for commercial and office uses by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087- 011, Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751, collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street. WHEREAS, said Specific Plan 1987-011, Amendment No.4 has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the Community Development Department has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2002-459), and determined that the proposed Specific Plan will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact is recommended for certification; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to justify the recommendation for approval of the Specific Plan: 498 AACC RESO SP 1987-011 Amd No. 4.wpd Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 1987-01 1, Amendment No. 4 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 Page 2 1 . That the proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the property is designated Regional Commercial which permits the uses proposed for the property. 2. That the Specific Plan is compatible with the existing and anticipated development in the area, in that the project, as conditioned, provides adequate circulation. 3. That the proposed Specific Plan will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in that the resulting uses will require Planning Commission review and approval of development plans under a Site Development Permit, which will ensure adequate Conditions of Approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve of the above -described Specific Plan request for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of December, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California A:\CC RESO SP 1987-011 Amd No. 4.wpd 493 w11 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 1987-011, Amendment No. 4 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 Page 3 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California A:\CC RESO SP 1987-011 Amd No. 4.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan, or any other application pertaining thereto. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Specific Plan, and any Parcel Map submitted thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water, LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . 501. RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 a. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres of land or more, Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). b. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. d. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): i. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). ii. Temporary Sediment Control. iii. Wind Erosion Control. iv. Tracking Control. V. Non -Storm Water Management. vi. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. e. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. f. The approved SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. * 5. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Parcel Map all public street right- of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 7. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this 5 0'' {� 4j J RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 development include: a. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Washington Street ( Augmented major arterial, 132-foot right of way) additional 6 foot dedication measured from the property line shown in the recorded Quit Claim deed per instrument number 164281 through 164314, to provide for a 132 feet of right of way. This dedication may be waived if a future General Plan Amendment is approved by the City Council. 2) Adams Street from Highway 111 to Avenue 47 - No dedication required. 3) Highway 111 from Simon Drive to Adams Street ( Special class of Major Arterial, 140 feet), additional 15 foot dedication will be required measured from the existing 55 foot right-of-way to provide for a 70 feet of right-of-way measured from the street centerline. 4) Avenue 47 from Washington Street to Adams Street - No dedication required. B. Miscellaneous Right -of -Way Dedications Requirements 1) Right-of-way geometry for standard corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 2 Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 3. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved Specific plan are necessary prior to approval of any subdivision map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right- of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 4. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, bus turn out, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Parcel Map. 8. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right- 503 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 of -ways as follows: A. Washington Street (Augmented Major Arterial) - 20 feet from the R/W - P/L. B. Adams Street (Secondary Arterial) - 10 feet from the R/W - P/L. C. Avenue 47 (Collector) - 10 feet from the R/W - P/L. D. Highway 1 1 1 (Special class of Major Arterial)- 50 feet from the R/W - P/L. E. Simon Drive (Secondary Arterial) - 10 feet from the R/W -PL The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. . 9. At locations where the onsite finished grade adjacent to the landscaped setback lot has an elevation differential with respect to the arterial street top of curb exceeding 5 feet, the applicant shall comply with, and accommodate, the maximum slope gradients in the parkway/setback area and meandering sidewalk requirements by either: 1) increasing the landscape setback size as needed, or 2) installing retaining walls between the sidewalk and the back of the landscaped area as needed. 10. Direct vehicular access to Highway 1 1 1, Washington Street, Avenue 47, Adams Street and Simon Drive from lots with frontage along Highway 1 1 1, Washington Street, Avenue 47, Adams Street and Simon Drive are restricted, except for those access points identified on the Specific Plan for this project, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. 11. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 12. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Parcel Map and the date of recording of the Parcel Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. 504 11 O"7 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 13. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate. 14. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal D. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 " = 30' Horizontal F. Site Development Plan: * 1 " = 40' Horizontal G. Site Utility Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal *Prior to submitting the Site Development Plan for review and approval, the applicant shall submit a site development phasing for approval. Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1- foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 505 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements for the parking lot and access to the building. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. The "Site Utility" plan shall have signature blocks for the Building Official and the City Engineer. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Site Development" plan and a "Site Utility" plan are required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. 15. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 16. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 17. Prior to the approval of the Parcel Map pertaining to this Specific Plan, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on site and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 18. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of 506 any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements. RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the completion or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 19. Depending on the timing of the development of this Specific Plan, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (A) Construct certain off -site improvements. (B) Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. (C) Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of the tentative parcel map. (D) Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. (E) To agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 20. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. 21. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City 507 shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. [CUFff Oki 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 23. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 24. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC, and D. An approved Better Management Plan prepared by a qualified engineer. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 25. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 26. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the back slope (ie the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six (6) feet of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas 508 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 27. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 28. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 29. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 30. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 101WAINUM 31. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. rn/� RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 32. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 33. Use underground drainage facilities for additional storage if the proposed retention basins are not capable of handling the 100 year storm. Hydrology/hydraulic calculations and design of the underground facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to installation. 34. Nuisance water shall be retained on site and shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 35. Storm water may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 36. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 37. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 38. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 39. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 40. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 41. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply t Q RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 42. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets 43. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 44. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Highway 111 from La Quinta Center Dr. to Adams Street, as required by CALTRANS. A) Construct an eastbound right turn lane only at Adams Street. B) Widen the south side of Highway 111 from La Quinta Center Drive to Adams Street to its ultimate half street width as required by CALTRANS. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, street pavement, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. C) Install Bus Shelter per City Standard approximately 15C feet east of La Quinta Center Drive with power and water. The applicant shall provide perpetual water and power service at its expense. D) Install an 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. 511 2) Adams Street from Highway 111 to Avenue 47 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 A) Widen the west side of the street from Highway 111 to Avenue 47 to comply with Primary Arterial A street standard, unless a future General Plan amendment leaves the street classification as a secondary Arterial, to include, but not limited to street pavement, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. B) Install an 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. 3) Washington Street between Simon Drive to Avenue 47 A) Widen the east side of the street from Simon Drive to Avenue 47 to comply with the Augmented Major street standard, unless the future General Plan amendment changes the street classification, to include but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. B) Construct the median with approved landscaping and provide left turn pockets for the southbound traffic at the southerly driveway. C) Install Bus Shelter per City Standard approximately 150 feet north of Avenue 47 with power and water. The applicant shall provide perpetual water and power service at its expense. D) Install an 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. 4) Avenue 47 from Washington Street to Adams Street A) Repair, replace, any broken, altered or missing sidewalk, curb. And gutter B) Reimburse the developer, Spanos, 50% for those improvements installed on the north side of the centerline at Avenue 47. 5) Traffic signal A► At Adams Street 512. �r J 1 . A traffic signal at Avenue 47 shall be installed when warrants are met. The developer shall pay 50% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal. B) Highway 111 1. At Adams Street intersection 2. A. Optical receivers on both the eastbound and westbound traffic shall be relocated to the southwest corner of this intersection. B. The Applicant shall modify the traffic signal as needed to accommodate the new street improvement. 3. At La Quinta Drive intersection A. Optical receivers for westbound traffic shall be relocated to the southwest corner of this intersection. B. The Applicant shall modify the traffic signal phasing according to the traffic study. 4. At Washington Street. A. Applicant shall modify the traffic signal phasing according to the traffic study B) Washington Street at Avenue 47 Reimburse the developer, Spanos, 25% of the cost for the design and construction of the traffic signalization at Washington street and Avenue 47. 45. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander 25 feet into the landscape setback lot and at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. 46. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: 513 Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial Augmented Major Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. 4.0"/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.00" 5.5"/6.50" 5.5"/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. General access points shall be a minimum of 250 feet apart measured between curb returns, and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Entries at Highway 1 1 1 : Driveways shall be restricted to right turn in and right turn out only, except at existing signalized entries. B. Entries at Avenue 47: Full access turn is allowed. The second driveway from Washington Street shall be moved to meet the minimum 250 foot spacing between driveway approaches measured at curb returns. C. Entries at Washington Street: 1) At Simon Drive: Shall be restricted to right turn in, right turn out, and left turn In. Left turn out is prohibited. 2) South driveway shall be restricted to right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in only. Left turn out is prohibited. 3) The north driveway shall be restricted to right turn in and right turn out only. D. Entry at Adams Street: Driveway shall be restricted to right turn in and right turn out only. There shall be a minimum 250 foot spacing between the drive way approach and the intersection at Avenue 47 measured at the curb returns. E. Entries at Simon Drive: Full access turn is allowed. 48. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 49. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 50 Standard corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 514 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 51. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. ' 01 52. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 53. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 54. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 55. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 56. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. • ' Me *4 57. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 58. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 515 � Y RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 59. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 60. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 61. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 62. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. 63. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC.). 64. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 65. Approved super fire hydrants, shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. 66. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 67. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 4000 gpm and the actual fire flow from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2000 gpm for a 4-hour duration at 20-psi residual operating pressure. 516 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 68. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 69. Water plans for the fire protection system (fire hydrants, etc.) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 70. City of La Quinta ordinance requires all commercial buildings 5,000 sq. ft. or larger to be fully sprinkled. NFPA 13 Standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the Fire Department. 71. Any operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a Hood/duct system for fire protection. (Restaurants, drive-thru's, etc.) 72. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 73. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. Streets shall be a minimum 20 feet wide with a height of 13"6" clear and unobstructed. 74. Install a KNOX key box on each commercial building and/or suite. (Contact the fire department for an application). 75. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code and in accordance with NFPA 10. 76. Prior to approval of a precise grading plan, the applicant shall prepare a separate landscape plan for Highway 111. The applicant shall prepare a separate palette of materials in the Landscape Plan consistent with the La Quinta Highway 111 Design Theme. The plan shall include improvements consistent with the City of La Quinta Highway 111 Design Theme (10-6-97) and including the same landscape lighting bollards at the existing Lowe's Home Improvement store. The applicant shall provide landscape improvements in the perimeter setback areas along Highway 111 and on the east side of La Quinta Center Drive. The Highway 111 landscape plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department Director. 77. All tree specimens shall be 36 inch box or better along the main/central , walkway from Highway 111. 5 1 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1987-011, AMENDMENT NO. 4 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 78. Landscaping equal to five percent of the net project area shall be provided within parking areas per Zoning Code section 9.100.040. The landscape plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department Director. 79. Delete paragraph number two under Development Standards on page 11 of the Specific Plan which does not apply. 80. Further define Item K "Architectural Detail" in the Materials Palette. 81. The total site parking calculation for the Specific Plan shall include all buildings including useable outdoor space such as outdoor dining and outdoor garden centers. 82. The parking lot design and parking lot lighting plan, including the illumination study, shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan. 83. Within 30 days of City Council approval, the final Conditions of Approval shall be incorporated in the Final Specific Plan document. Applicant shall work with staff to correct internal document inconsistencies prior to final publication of Specific Plan document. 84. No drive through lanes associated with fast food stores shall be allowed. 513 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COMMERCIAL ATHLETIC FACILITY USE OVER 5,000 SQUARE FEET CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-072 APPLICANT: WASHINGTON 111, LTD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of December, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of Washington 1 1 1, LTD for approval of an athletic facility use over 5,000 square feet by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087-01 1, Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751, collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street, more particularly described as : A.P.N.'S: 643-020-017, 643-020-018, 643-020-022, 643-020-023, and 643-090-016 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did on the 26th day of November, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Washington 1 1 1, LTD for approval of an athletic facility use over 5,000 square feet by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087-011. Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903)and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751, collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 111. WHEREAS, said Conditional Use Permit has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the Community Development Department has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2002-459), and determined that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact is recommended for certification; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to justify the recommendation for approval of the Conditional Use Permit: 1 . The project is consistent with the General Plan in that the property proposed for the athletic facility is designated as Regional Commercial and allows this land use. 2. This project has been designed to be consistent with the provisions of the 519 Planning Commission Resolution 2002- Conditional Use Permit 2002-071 - Washington 111, LTD Adopted: November 26, 2002 Page 2 Zoning Code or amended as allowed in the applicable Specific Plan. 3. Processing and approval of this project is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that this Conditional Use Permit will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been certified. 4. The site design of the project is appropriate for the use in that it has been designed with the appropriate parking and vehicular access, and provided with adequate landscaping. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does approve of the above -described Conditional Use Permit request for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of December, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California A:\CC RESO CUP 2002-071.wpd 5420 6,('J Planning Commission Resolution 2002- Conditional Use Permit 2002-071 - Washington 111, LTD Adopted: November 26, 2002 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 521 A:\CC RESO CUP 2002-071.wpd `� d RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-072 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 FIRE MARSHALL 1 . Approved super fire hydrants, shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. 2. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 3. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 4000 gpm and the actual fire flow from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2000 gpm for a 4-hour duration at 20-psi residual operating pressure. 4. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 5. Water plans for the fire protection system (fire hydrants, etc.) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. City of La Quinta ordinance requires all commercial buildings 5,000 sq. ft. or larger to be fully sprinkled. NFPA 13 Standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the Fire Department. 7. Any operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a Hood/duct system for fire protection. (Restaurants, drive-thru's, etc.) 8. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 9. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. Streets shall be a minimum 20 feet wide with a height of 13"6" clear and unobstructed. 10. Install a KNOX key box on each commercial building and/or suite. (Contact the fire department for an application) 11. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code and 5 2 in accordance with NFPA 10. G;J RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-072 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 MISCELLANEOUS 12. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. A:1CC COA CUP 2002-072.wpd G ,n J RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 50.62 ACRES INTO SIX LOTS CASE NO.: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 APPLICANT: WASHINGTON 111, LTD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17`h day of December, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of Washington 111, LTD to subdivide six lots on 50.62 acres by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087-011 Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002- 751, collectively "the Project", generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street, more particularly described as : A.P.N.'S: 643-020-017, 643-020-018, and 643-020-023, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26TH day of November, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of Washington 1 1 1, LTD to subdivide six lots on 50.62 acres by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087-011 Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751, collectively "the Project", generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street; and WHEREAS, said Tentative Parcel Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment was completed for this project; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Commission did make the following Mandatory Findings of approval to justify said Tentative Parcel Map 30586: The proposed map is consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan Commercial Land Use Policy 3 in that strip commercial development will be discouraged and minimum lot depth is achieved. 2. The design, or improvement of, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and the Subdivision Ordinance. All streets and improvements in the project conform to City standards contained in the General Plan and Subdivision Ordinance as designed. All or J 7 4 r� A:\CC RESO PM 30903.wpd a Resolution 2002- Tentative Parcel Map 30903 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 site streets will be private. Access for the commercial project will be provided from an internal street planned under the Specific Plan. I. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map, or the proposed improvements, are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially injure fish or wildlife, or their habitat. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed land division. Therefore, this project will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to fish or wildlife, or their habitat because mitigation measures will be implemented. 4. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map, or type of improvements, are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map, as conditionally approved, will not cause serious public health problems because they will install urban improvements based on City, State, and Federal requirements. 5. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map, or type of improvements, will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed streets are planned to provide direct access to each building in the commercial center. All required public easements will provide access to the site or support necessary infrastructure improvements. 6. The design of the lots, or type of improvements, are not likely to cause serious public health problems in that the Fire Marshal, Sheriff's Department, and the City's Building and Safety Department have reviewed the proposal for public health conditions and the project is conditioned as appropriate. 7. The design of the lots, or type of improvements, will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that the proposed internal streets will be privately owned and maintained, and that there will be no publicly - owned improvements within the Tentative Parcel Map. 8. The design of the lots and grading improvements, within the tract are an acceptable minimum in that the tract design preserves community acceptance and buyer satisfaction; and 5r5 A:\CC RESO PM 30903.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Parcel Map 30903 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Parcel Map, the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of La Quinta and its environs with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map 30903 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this the 17`h day of December, 2002 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 526 A:\CC RESO PM 30903.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Parcel Map 30903 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California A:\CC RESO PM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Parcel Map, or any Parcel Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Parcel Map, and any Parcel Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance 528 No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ. v- 1. AACC COA TPM 30903.wpd Ul ' -"- RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The approved SWPPP anad BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Parcel Map all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 529 G " . 21 A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 7. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Washington Street ( Augmented major arterial, 132-foot right of way) additional 6 foot dedication measured from the property line shown in the Quit Claim deed recorded per instrument number 164281 through 164314, to provide for a 132 feet of right of way. This dedication may be waived if a future General Plan Amendment is approved by the City Council. 2) Adams Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 47 - No dedication required. 3) Highway 1 1 1 from Simon Drive to Adams Street ( Special class of Major Arterial, 140 feet), additional 15 foot dedication will be required measured from the existing 55 foot right-of-way to provide for a 70 feet of right-of- way measured from the street centerline. 4) Avenue 47 from Washington Street to Adams Street - No dedication required. B. Miscellaneous Right -of -Way Dedications Requirements 1) Right-of-way geometry for standard corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 2 Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 3. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved Specific plan are necessary prior to approval of any subdivision map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 4. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, bus turn out, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Parcel Map. 530 AXC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 8. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of-ways as follows: A. Washington Street (Augmented Major Arterial) - 20 feet from the R/W to P/L. B. Adams Street (Secondary Arterial) - 10-feet from the R/W to P/L. C. Avenue 47 (Collector) - 10-feet from the R/W-P/L. D. Highway 1 1 1 (Special class of Major Arterial) 50 feet from the R/W to P/L. E. Simon Drive (Secondary Arterial) - 10 feet from the R/W to PL The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. 9. At locations where the onsite finished grade adjacent to the landscaped setback lot has an elevation differential with respect to the arterial street top of curb exceeding 5 feet, the applicant shall comply with, and accommodate, the maximum slope gradients in the parkway/setback area and meandering sidewalk requirements by either: 1► increasing the landscape setback size as needed, or 2) installing retaining walls between the sidewalk and the back of the landscaped area as needed. 10. Direct vehicular access to Highway 1 1 1, Washington Street, Avenue 47, Adams Street and Simon Drive from lots with frontage along Highway 1 1 1, Washington Street, Avenue 47, Adams Street and Simon Drive are restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Parcel Map for this project, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. 11. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 12. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and the date of recording of any Parcel Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. PARCEL MAPS 13. Prior to the City's approval of a Parcel Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate 5,11 AutoCAD files of the Parcel Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a R AXC COA TPM 30903.wpd 1 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Parcel Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster - image file of such Parcel Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 14. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 15. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal D. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 " = 30' Horizontal F. Site Development Plan*: 1 " = 40' Horizontal G. Site Utility Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal *Prior to submitting the Site Development Plan for review and approval, the applicant shall submit a site development phasing for approval. Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed 532 above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. AXC COA TPM 30903.wpd (j RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and current ADA requirements. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. The "Site Utility" plan shall have signature blocks for the Building Official and the City Engineer. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Site Development" plan and a "Site Utility" plan are required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. 16. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 17. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 18. Prior to the approval the Parcel Map, the applicant shall construct all onsite and off -site 533 improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and AACC COA TPM 30903.wpd i✓ a Li RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 19. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 20. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on - site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the completion or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 21. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Parcel Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (A) Construct certain off -site improvements. (B) Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. (C) Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative parcel map. (D) Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. (E) To agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Parcel Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 534 AXC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 22. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Parcel Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Parcel Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. 23. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 25. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 26. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. D. An approved BMP's prepared by a qualified engineer. 5 3 5 0 A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Parcel Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 27. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 28. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the back slope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six (6) feet of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 29. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties ands 3 6 neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 30. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 31. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 33. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 34. Use underground drainage facilities for additional storage if the proposed retention basins are not capable of handling the 100 year storm. Hydrology/hydraulic calculations and design of the underground facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to installation. 35. Nuisance water shall be retained on site and shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 36. Storm water may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, 537 pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 37. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 38. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 39. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 40. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 41. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 42. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 43. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 44. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally), LQMC for public streets; 45. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 539 A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd ` r RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 46. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Highway 1 1 1 from La Quinta Center Dr. to Adams Street, as required by CALTRANS. A) Construct an eastbound right turn lane only at Adams Street. B) Widen the south side of the highway from La Quinta Center Drive to Adams Street to its ultimate half street width as required by CALTRANS. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, street pavement, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. C) Install Bus Shelter per City Standard approximately 150 feet east of La Quinta Center Drive with power and water. The applicant shall provide perpetual water and power service at its expense. D) Install an 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. 2) Adams Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 47 A) Widen the west side of the street from Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 47 to comply with Primary Arterial A street standard, unless a future General Plan amendment leaves the street classification as a secondary Arterial, to include, but not limited to street pavement, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. B) Install an 8-foot wide sidewalk. 3) Washington Street from Simon Drive to Avenue 47 (Augmented Major Arterial, 132 foot R/W) A) Widen the east side of the street from Simon Drive to Avenue 47 to comply with the Augmented Major street standard, unless the future General Plan amendment changes the street classification, to include but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 B) Construct the median with approved landscaping and provide left turn pockets for the southbound traffic at the southerly driveway. C) Install Bus Shelter per City Standard approximately 150 feet north of Avenue 47 with power and water. The applicant shall provide perpetual water and power service at its expense. D) Install an 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. 4) Avenue 47 from Washington Street to Adams Street A) Repair, replace, any broken, altered or missing sidewalk, curb. And gutter B) Reimburse the developer, Spanos, 50% for those improvements installed on the north side of the centerline at Avenue 47. 5) Traffic Signal A) At Adams Street 1. A traffic signal at Avenue 47 shall be installed when warrants are met. The developer shall pay 50% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal. B) Highway 111 1. At Adams Street intersection A. Optical receivers on both the eastbound and westbound traffic shall be relocated to the southwest corner of this intersection. B. The Applicant shall modify the traffic signal as needed to accommodate the new street improvement. 2. At La Quinta Drive intersection A. Optical receivers for westbound traffic shall be relocated to the southwest corner of this intersection. 540 A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 B. The Applicant shall modify the traffic signal phasing according to the traffic study. 3. Washington Street. A. Applicant shall modify the traffic signal phasing according to the traffic study. B) Washington Street at Avenue 47 Reimburse the developer, Spanos, 25% of the cost for the design and construction of the traffic signalization at Washington street and Avenue 47. 47. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander 25 feet into the landscape setback lot and at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. 48. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial Augmented Major Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. 4.0"/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.00" 5.5"/6.50" 5.5"/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 49. General access points shall be a minimum of 250 feet apart measured between curb returns, and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: 541 A. Entries at Highway 1 1 1 : Driveways shall be restricted to right turn in and right turn out only, except at existing signalized entries. AACC COA TPM 30903.wpd ( i RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 B. Entries at Avenue 47: Full access turns are allowed. The second driveway from Washington Street shall be moved to meet the minimum 250 foot spacing between driveway approaches measured at curb returns. C. Entries at Washington Street: 1) At Simon Drive: Shall be restricted to right turn in, right turn put, and left turn in. Left turn out is prohibited. 2) South driveway shall be restricted to right turn in, right turn out, and left turn in only. Left turn out is prohibited. 3) The north driveway shall be restricted to right turn in and right turn out only. D. Entry at Adams Street: Driveway shall be restricted to right turn in and right turn out only. There shall be a minimum 250 foot spacing between the drive way approach and the intersection at Avenue 47 measured at the curb returns. E. Entries at Simon Drive: Full access turn is allowed. 50. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 51. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 52. Standard corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 53. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. LANDSCAPING 54. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. J 4 Z. A:ACC COA TPM 30903.wpd �� RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 55. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 56. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 57. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 58. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 59. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 60. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 61. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 62. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each 543 sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd (� '� RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 63. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 64. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 65. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 66. Permits issued under this approval shall Development Impact Fee Program in effec permit(s)_ FIRE MARSHALL t be subject to the provisions of the at the time of issuance of building 67. Approved super fire hydrants, shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. 68. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 69. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 4000 gpm and the actual fire flow from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2000 gpm for a 4-hour duration at 20-psi residual operating pressure. 70. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 71. Water plans for the fire protection system (fire hydrants, etc.) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 544 A:\CC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30903 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 72. City of La Quinta ordinance requires all commercial buildings 5,000 sq. ft. or larger to be fully sprinkled. NFPA 13 Standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the Fire Department. 73. Any operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a Hood/duct system for fire protection. (Restaurants, drive-thru's, etc.) 74. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 75. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. Streets shall be a minimum 20 feet wide with a height of 13"6" clear and unobstructed. 76. Install a KNOX key box on each commercial building and/or suite. (Contact the fire department for an application) 77. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code and in accordance with NFPA 10. 545 AXC COA TPM 30903.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR FIVE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta did on the 17th day of December, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Washington 111, LTD for approval of development plans for five commercial buildings within a planned commercial center by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087-01 1 Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751, collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street, more particularly described as: A.P.N.'S 643-020-017, 643-020-018, 643-020-022, 643-020-023, and 643-090-016 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did on the 26th day of November, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Washington 1 1 1, LTD for approval of development plans for five commercial buildings within a planned commercial center by means of a Specific Plan (SP 2002-087-011 Amendment No.4), Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2002-072), Parcel Map (TPM 30903), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751, collectively "the Project" generally bounded by Highway 1 1 1, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street. WHEREAS, the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee of the City of La Quinta did on the 6th day of November, 2002, hold a duly noticed public meeting to consider a request for development plans for five commercial buildings within a planned commercial center by means of a Site Development Permit (SDP) 2002-751; and WHEREAS, said Site Development Permit has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the Community Development Department has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2002-459), and determined that the proposed Site Development Permit will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is recommended for certification; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to justify the j recommendation for approval of the Site Development Permit: G Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2002-759 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2003 Page 2 1 . The project is consistent with the General Plan in that the property proposed for the commercial project is designated as Regional Commercial. 2. This project has been designed to be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code, or amended as allowed in the applicable Specific Plan. 3. Processing and approval of this project is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that this site Development Permit will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact has been certified. 4. The site design of the project is appropriate for the use in that it has been designed with the appropriate parking and vehicular access, and provided with adequate landscaping. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve of the above -described Site Development Permit request for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of December, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 9,47 �q1 Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2002-759 Washington 111, LTD Adopted: December 17, 2003 Page 3 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 548 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 GENERAL 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting the improvement plans for City approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). 549 r� A:\CC COA SDP 2002-751.wpd RESOLUTION 2002-111 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this Site Development Permit. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practice ("BMPs"), 8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC: 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The approved SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. PROPERTY RIGHTS 4. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Property Rights set forth under Parcel Map 30903. PARCEL MAP 5. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map set forth under Parcel Map 30903. IMPROVEMENT PLANS 6. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Improvement Plans set forth under Specific Plan No. 87-01 1 Amendment No.4. 550 (., A:\CC COA SDP 2002-751.wpd RESOLUTION 2002-111 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 7. Prior to submitting the Site Development plan for review and approval, the applicant will submit a site development phasing for approval. OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENT 8. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of approval for Off -site Improvement Security Agreement set forth under Parcel Map 30903. GRADING 9. The Applicants shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Grading set forth under Specific Plan No. 87-01 1 Amendment No. 4. DRAINAGE 10. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Drainage set forth under Specific Plan No. 87-01 1 Amendment No.4. UTILITIES 1 1. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Utilities set forth under Specific Plan No. 87-01 1 Amendment No. 4. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 12. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Street and Traffic Improvements set forth under Specific Plan No. 87-01 1 Amendment No. 4. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 13. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Parking Lots and Access points set forth under Specific Plan No. 87-01 1 Amendment No. 4. LANDSCAPING 14. The Applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Landscaping set forth under Specific Plan No. 87-01 1 Amendment No. 4. 551 A:\CC COA SDP 2002-751 .wpd RESOLUTION 2002-111 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 QUALITY ASSURANCE 15. The applicant will employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 16. The applicant will employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such Cr other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 17. The applicant will arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 18. Upon completion of construction, the applicant will furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 19. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 20. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks, FEES AND DEPOSITS 21. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 1 ' J A:\CC COA SDP 2002-751.wpd RESOLUTION 2002-111 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD DECEMBER 17, 2002 22. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 23. Prior to completion of any approval process, the developer has to pay Spanos 50%for the cost incurred in completing the north side portion of Avenue 47, and 25% for the design and installation of the traffic signal at Washington Street and Avenue 47. FIRE MARSHALL 24. Approved super fire hydrants, shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. 25. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 26. Fire Department connections shall be not less than 25 feet nor more than 50 feet from a fire hydrant and shall be located on the street side of the buildings. 27. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 4000 gpm and the actual fire flow from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2000 gpm for a 4-hour duration at 20-psi residual operating pressure. This flow is based on the largest building size at 126,000-2 ft. 28. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 29. Water plans for the fire protection system (fire hydrants, FDC, etc.) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 30. City of La Quinta ordinance requires all commercial buildings 5,000 sq. ft. or larger to be fully sprinkled. NFPA 13 Standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the Fire Department. 553 - n A:\CC COA SDP 2002-751.wpd PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD NOVEMBER 26, 2002 31. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 32. Fire Department street access shall come to within 150 feet of all portions of the 1 st. floor of all buildings, by path of exterior travel. 33. Any commercial operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a Hood/duct system for fire protection. (Restaurants, drive-thru's, etc.) 34. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. Streets shall be a minimum 20 feet wide with a height of 13"6" clear and unobstructed. 35. Install a KNOX key box on each commercial suite and/or building. (Contact the fire department for an application) 36. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code. MISCELLANEOUS 37. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a more complete description of Item K "Architectural Detail" in the Materials Palette is required. 38. Prior to issuance of a building permit, eliminate all wall banners from all architectural elevations and from the color and material board. 39. Prior to approval of a precise grading plan, landscaping calculations equal to five percent of the net project area shall be provided within parking areas per Zoning Code section 9.100.040. The landscape plan site plan for the parking areas shall be approved by the Community Development Department Director. 40. The Target Building shall have a vertical average height of 35 feet up to 40 feet; and work with staff to design variations in color or materials on the midsection of the front of the building. 41. A vestibule shall be added to the entrance of the Target building. A:\CC COA SDP 2002-751.wpd PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-751 WASHINGTON 111, LTD NOVEMBER 26, 2002 42. Additional articulation shall be added around the door on the front elevation of the Target building. rl;l15 A:\CC COA SDP 2002-751.wpd ATTACHMENT #1 VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION 550 ATTACHMENT #5 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 26, 2002 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission Was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Butler who lead the fla salute. B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abel , Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Richard Butler. C. Staff present: Communit/eer ment Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John RamEngineer Tim Jonasson, Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer, Manager Oscar Ord, Principal Planner Fred Baker, Associate Esa Paisley, Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit, and Executive Setty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE/AGENDA: Confirmed IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman B ler asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of November 2, 2002. Commissioner Kirk noted that on Page 2, Item 5 under Rol Call, Commissioner Tyler's vote should show that he was in favor of he project. There being no further corrections, it was moved and se onded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to approve the minutes as amen ed. Unanimously approved. B. De0artment Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 2002-459 Specific Plan 87-01 1 Amendment #4 Conditional Use Pemit 2002-072 Tentative Parcel Map 30903, and Site Development Permit 2002-751; a request of Dale Frank and 557 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 Associates/Washington 1 1 1, LTD, for: 1) certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact; 2) consideration of design guidelines and development standards for a 488,050 square foot commercial center; 3) consideration of a conditional use permit to allow a health club over 50.62 square feet; 4) consideration of a tentative parcel map to allow the subdivision of 50.71 acres into six parcels; and 5) Consideration of a site development permit to allow construction of five commercial buildings for the property bounded by Highway 1 1 1 on the north, Avenue 47 on the south, Washington Street on the West and Adams Street on the east. 1. Chairman Butler opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if La Quinta Center Drive is a public or private street. Staff stated it is private and pointed out all the access points. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked for clarification on the traffic assessment portion of the Environmental Checklist. Environmental Consultant Nicole Criste stated the traffic assessment looked at overall trips and pass by trips are those trips that would be on Washington Street regardless, and would stop in at the center. Commissioner Kirk asked if a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan would be required. Staff stated it would be required. This is the first project that has been conditioned to provide a TDM. Commissioner Kirk asked what the use was for the drive through on Shop 3. Staff stated at the present there is no specified use, but they are talking to Starbucks. The drive through would be approved as part of the Specific Plan. 4. Commissioner Robbins asked if the Champion Chevrolet building and the building at the corner, comply with the height requirements. Staff stated La Quinta Court does have buildings that were approved in excess of the 22-foot height limitation. Commissioner Robbins asked if a Big 5 Sporting Goods store had not already been approved for,the center across the street. Staff stated they have decided to be in this project. 55 , G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\1 1-26-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 5. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition 7 of the Specific Plan where the applicant is being asked to comply with a future General Plan Amendment. He asked how the City can require the applicant to meet a condition that is not in place at the time of approval. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the current General Plan identifies Washington Street as an eight lane roadway and there is a potential to reduce that within a General Plan Amendment. The applicant will be required to comply with whichever General Plan requirement is in place at the time the project is built. Commissioner Tyler asked the City Attorney if this was possible. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated he was uncertain and would respond after reviewing the appropriate document. Commissioner Tyler asked why the applicant was being required to pay 50% of the signal at Adams Street and Avenue 47 when it only has one third of the corner or 25%. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated 50% has already been paid for by the Auto Mall and there is no other developer who can be charged, so the applicant has the burden of the remainder of the cost. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dale Frank, applicant, gave a presentation on the project. In regard to the General Plan Amendment he would dedicate six feet on Washington Street so, if the City goes to four lanes, the land is available with no utilities in the street. 7. Chairman Butler asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Abels asked about the proposed market that would be in competition with the existing market. Mr. Frank stated Jensons is a specialty market and the proposed Henry's is a national company that is similar to a Trader Joes which is a different product type. 8. Commissioner Robbins asked about the ancillary doors on the front of the Target building. Mr. Frank stated the site plan is from the Target corporation. Mr. Saeid Shantiyai, representing Target, stated they are offices that need outdoor access. He went on to explain the building design. 9. Commissioner Kirk stated the Target elevation seems to suffer architecturally in comparison to the other parts of the center. By 5 itself it is a good design, but in comparison to the other buildings G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\1 1-26-02.wpd 3 1 03 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 it falls short. Buildings 3 and 4 are very well done. The Target needs some work between the entrance and the garden center. The height of Target building is 35 feet and you are asking for additional height on the other buildings. Mr. Frank stated functionally they may need to raise the height. Commissioner Kirk stated that giving more height may be a trade off for additional facade. He would like to see ways to improve the facade design on the Target building. Mr. Frank stated that the parking is sunken which may raise the building. Commissioner Kirk asked about the accesses on Avenue 47. Mr. Frank stated it was an error on the plans and his architects will have to reconfigure the accesses. Commissioner Kirk asked about the impact on the residents on the south side of Avenue 47 in regard to circulation. Mr. Frank stated they have considered the residents and believe they have taken everything into consideration. Commissioner Kirk asked why the landscaping was being phased. Mr. Shantiyai stated the landscaping is colored only for affect, it is not a phasing plan. Mr. Frank stated that as each building is built, the landscaping will be complete for that entire portion of that site. 10. Commissioner Tyler noted that the landscaping looks great on paper, but does not always translate into reality. He asked the location of the loading dock. Mr. Frank noted the location on the site plan. Mr. Shantiyai stated the plan is based on Target's prototype. Commissioner Tyler asked about color variations on the buildings. Mr. Shantiyai stated the color palette shows the colors intended to be used. 1 1 . Commissioner Abels stated he thought there should be a vestibule on the front of the larger stores. Mr. Shantiyai stated they do intend to use one. 12. Chairman Butler stated he is not in favor of a drive through in association with a fast food. He noted the landscaping and extensive trees, but in reality they do not reach any real growth. Mr. Frank stated they are looking for larger trees to initially plant. 13. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Butler asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Adam Zack, Vice President of Jensons Food, stated they do not oppose the project, but have an objection to Henry's. It is similar to their .5 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 4 1 '' Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 store. They are trying to build their store and there lease does have exclusive uses. Besides bring competition to an existing tenant, they believe it may violate their lease. 14. There being no further public participation, Chairman Butler closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 15. Commissioner Abels stated he thinks it is a great project and he supports it. 16. Commissioner Tyler stated he agrees and asked if the health club was an uncertainty. If the health club was not a known entity, why process the conditional use permit. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it gives the applicant the opportunity to secure a health club owner. 17. Commissioner Kirk stated this is an outstanding project and he likes the landscaping. Circulation issues are minor and could be worked out with staff. His greatest concern is the Target building. He thinks it would be appropriate for the building to be taller than proposed and would suggest conditioning the building to be larger and higher with landscaping enhanced along the front. There could be some additional vertical relief as well as horizontal relief. 18. Commissioner Robbins stated that in this case he likes the rear of the building more than the front. They need to do something with the doors on the front of the building. 19. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abets to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-107 recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2002-459, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Butler. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 20. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-108 recommending approval of Specific Plan 87-01 1 Amendment #4, subject to the findings and conditions as amended. J G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 a. Condition #82: add after lighting plan, "including illumination plan". ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 21. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-109 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 2002-072, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-1 10 recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map 30903, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 23. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Tyler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-111 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002-751, subject to the findings and conditions as amended. a. Add a Condition that requires the Target building to have an average vertical height of 35 feet and up to 40 feet and work with staff to seek variation in color or materials on the mid -section of the front facade. b. A vestibule shall be added at the entrance. C. Articulation shall be added around the doors on the front elevation. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Butler, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-26-02.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2002 24. Commissioner Robbins/Kirk moved to reconsider the Specific Plan Amendment. Unanimously approved. 25. It was moved by Chairman Butler and seconded by Commissioner Abels to add a condition to the Specific Plan that no drive through associated with a fast food stores shall be allowed. Unanimously approved. Chairman Butler recessed the meeting at 8:50 p.m. and reXonvened at 8:57 p.m. B. Village Use Permit 2002-015; a request o Prest Vuksic Architects for consideration of development plans for 96nstruction of a 6,700 square foot office building on a 0.4 acre parcel ocated at the northwest corner of Calle Amigo and Desert Club Drive. 1. Commissioner Kirk excused interest due to proximity of the dais. self due to a potential conflict of project to his residence, and left 2. Chairman Butler opened he public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information containe in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community velopment Department. 3. Chairman Butler Iasked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner T ler asked if the small sliver of land across from Calle A/iminated as buildable. Staff stated probably not as a commeding. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern was that if iuildable, this facade would be seen from Avenue 52. Altappears the planter in the middle of the parking lot could bto give more parking spaces. Staff stated they are reQhave two-way travel in the parking lot. 4. There eing no further questions of staff, Chairman Butler asked if th applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dave Pre t, representing the applicant stated he was available to answer an questions. 5. ommissioner Robbins asked how the applicant feels about the ggestions of the Architecture and Landscaping Review uw Committee. Mr. Prest stated they had no objections and had offered to eliminate a parking space to create a gathering place for r the workers of the office building as they suggested. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minuted\11-26-02.wpd 7 1 7