2003 07 08 PC Minutes MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
July 8, 2003 7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. This meeting of the Planning COmmission was called to order at 7:00
p.m. by Vice Chairman Tyler who lead the flag salute.
B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abels, Rick Daniels, Tom Kirk, Paul
Quill, and Vice Chairman Robert Tyler.
C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant
City Attorney Michael Houston, Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Assistant
City Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Associate
Planner Greg Trousdell.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA:
A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Kirk to amend the
Agenda to take Item "H" as Item "B", and reorganize the Agenda
accordingly. Unanimously approved.
B. Vice Chairman Tyler introduced the two new Commissioners, Rick
Daniels and Paul Quill, and welcomed them to the Commission.
IV. ELECTIONS:
A. Vice Chairman Tyler opened the nominations for Chairman. It was
moved by Commissioners Abels to nominate Tom Kirk as Chairman.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed and
Tom Kirk was unanimously elected as Chairman.
B. Chairman Kirk assumed the Chair and nominated Jacques Abels as Vice
Chairman. There being no further nominations, Jacques Abels was
elected Vice Chairman with Commissioner Tyler voting no.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
I. CONSENT ITEMS:
1. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of June
24, 2003. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston asked that Page
I.C., under Staff Present, it should be corrected to show that City
Attorney Kathy Jenson was present. Commissioner Tyler asked that
Page 9, Item 14 be corrected to read, "...that since the Specific Plan
applies to four of the original parcels owned Lapis Energy Development,
who has control over the individual sites." There being no further
corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler
to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved.
2. Department Report: None
VI. PRESENTATIONS:
A. Chairman Kirk asked that former Commissioners Rich Butler and Steve
Robbins come forward for presentation of a "Resolutions of Recognition"
for their service to the City as Planning Commissioners.
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Site Development Permit 2003-773; a request of California Cove
Communities for consideration of architectural plans for three new single
family prototype residential units with two different elevations for each
unit within the Greg Norman Golf Course development located at the
northeast corner of Madison Street and Airport Boulevard.
1. Planning Manager Oscar Orci informed the Commission the
applicant had requested a continuance to the meeting of July 29,
2003.
2. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Daniels/Abels to continue the project to July 29,
2003. Unanimously approved.
B. Continued - Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2003-076; a request of the
City for consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Code relating to
Front and Side Yard Setbacks and Lot Sizes: for Sections 9.30.020,
.030, .040, .050, .060,.070 - Residential Districts; Section 9.50.O70.B
- Residential Development Standards; Section 9.60.060.B - Supplemental
Residential Regulations; Section 9.60.320.C - Resort Residential; Table
9.2 - Residential Development Standards; Figure 9.1 - Development
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 2
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
Standards: RVL and RL Districts; Figure 9.2 - Development Standards:
RC Districts; Figure 9.3 - Development'Standards: RM and RMH
Districts; Figure 9.4 - Development Standards: RH and RSP Districts
1. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to
continue discussion of Zoning Code Amendment 2003-076 to the
Planning Commission meeting of July 29, 2003. Unanimously
approved.
C. Environmental Assessment 2003-476 and Capital Improvement Project
2000-06; a request of the City for a recommendation to the City Council
for certification of a Mitigated NegatiVe Declaration of environmental
impact and consideration of the design for the City's Municipal Library, to
be located at 78-275 Calle Tampico.
1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff
report. Planning Manager Oscar Orci presented the information
contained in the staffi report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department
2. Commissioner Quill asked staff to explain the purpose of the other
portion of the building that was not to be used at this time.
Community Services Director Dodie Horvitz explained it was
envisioned the Library would occupy the first 10,000 square feet
and the second 10,OOO square feet would be used for storage or
meeting rooms until such time as the funding was available for
the balance of the improvements.
3. Commissioner Tyler asked if staff had'a proposed schedule for
completion of the building. The architect, Mr. Thomas Anglewicz
of M.W. Steele Group, Inc., stated the schedule calls for
construction to begin in March, 2004. Commission Tyler
questioned whether there would be any additional parking being
installed for the Library. Mr. Anglewicz stated there were no plans
for additional parking.
4. Chairman Kirk asked why there was a 30 degree orientation to the
park. Mr. Anglewicz displayed the site plan and explained it was
oriented to complement the remainder of the Civic Center
complex. Chairman Kirk asked if the Architectural and Landscaping
Review Committee (ALRC) recommendations were incorporated
into the conditions. Mr. Anglewicz indicated they would include
the ALRC recommendations.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 3
.Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
5. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any public comment. There
being no public comment, the public participation portion of the
hearing was closed and open to Commission discussion.
6. There being no further discussion, it was moved ~and seconded by
Commissioners Abels/Daniels to adopt planning Commission
Resolution 2003-045 reCommending certification of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration of environmental impact, for Environmental
Assessment 2003-476.
'ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT:
None.
7. It was moved and' seconded by Commissioner Abels/Daniels to
adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-046 recommending
approval of the design for the construction of the City's Municipal
Library, as recommended.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN:
None.'
D. Site DevelOpment Permit 2002-774; a request of Michael Shovlin for
review of development plans for a one story commercial restaurant
building on 0.6 acres located at 78-902 Highway 111 within the One
Eleven La Quinta Center- Thai Smile.
1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff
report. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the
information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file
in the Community Development Department.
2. Commissioner Tyler asked why staff was requiring a handicap
sidewalk (Condition #49.A.). Staff explained it was needed for
access to the parking lot as there was a bus stop in close
proximity. Commissioner Tyler asked why the cost of the bus
shelter was not charged to the Center developer rather than the
individual building owner. Staff explained Mr. Shovlin was the
Center owner and he was responsible for the cost, but the cost
could be deferred to the development of one of the larger buildings
in the Center if it was the desire of the Commission.
Commissioner Tyler asked why the conditions from the Sheriff's
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 4
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
Department were not written into the conditions. Staff explained
there were no specific cOnditions, but rather general statements.
Staff is ensuring that should any issues arise, this condition would
require the developer to resolve any issues raised by the Sheriff's
Department. Commissioner Tyler asked why there were no
parking lot or lighting standards for this project. Staff explained
they would be governed by the Specific Plan and staff would
review them during plan check. Commissioner Tyler asked if the
outdoor patio protruded into the 50 foot setback along Highway
1 1 1, and if so, was that allowed. Staff stated it was allowed.
Commissioner Tyler asked what parking lot would contain the new
landscape planters referred to in the staff report. Staff stated if
would be on the portion constructed with the building.
3. Commissioner Daniels asked if the circulation had been considered
in regard to the trash receptacles on the north side of the building
and the deliveries and receiving areas. Staff stated this was
discussed during the ALRC meeting. At that time staff
recommended relocating it closer to the Eisenhower Immediate
Care Center, but the restaurant proprietor stated that for easier
use and control, it was better as designed.
4. Commissioner Quill asked if landscaping was proposed to soften
the east elevation. Staff stated there was and showed what was
proposed including the location for the metal lattice structure.
Commissioner Quill suggested the north elevation be enhanced by
either some type of roofing material instead of the parapet, with
some type of detail at the top. He then asked who is responsible
for the bus shelter. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated a permit
is issued by Caltrans and Sunline is responsible for the
maintenance. Staff stated the construction of the bus shelter is
included in the conditions and will be monitored by staff until
constructed. Mr. Cox, the architect, gave a presentation on the
project.
5. Commissioner Tyler asked if additional light standards would be
added to the parking lot used for this business.
6. Commissioner Quill suggested it be similar to the parking lot used
by Starbucks. Mr. Shovlin, developer of the Center, stated he
would provide staff with a photometric study on the site.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 5
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
7. Commissioner Tyler asked the location of the bicycle rack. Mr.
Cox stated it would be away from the door and out of the
sidewalk.
8. There being no further questions of the applicant or staff,
Chairman Kirk asked if anyone else would like to speak on this
project. Mr. Brandon Wood, proposed tenant, stated he would like
to amend the entryway elevations at a later date.
9. Commissioner Daniels asked if Mr. Wood had seen the conditions
allowing the exterior alterations. Mr. Wood stated he had no
objections to the conditions.
10. There being no further public comment, the public participation
portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission
discussion.
11. Commissioner Quill clarified that according to the way the
conditions were written, the Community Development Director will
be able to make a determination in regard to the exterior elevations
upon review of the final building plans. He questioned whether or
not the Asian gable end was architecturally in keeping with the
remainder of the site.
12. Chairman Kirk noted there was a consensus among the
COmmissioners that the elevations not be Asian in design in the
event a different user assumes the building sometime in the future.
Discussion followed regarding when and who would be responsible
for the construction of the new bus shelter.
13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission
Resolution 2003-047, approving Site Development Permit 2003-
774, as amended:
a. Condition added: The applicant shall add architectural and
landscaping enhancements to the northern elevation fa(;ade.
b. Condition added: The applicant shall provide a lighting
study to determine whether additional lighting is needed in
the parking lot.
c. Condition #49.A.: Deleted
d. Condition #49.C.: Any reference to "Asian" architecture
removed.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 6
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
e. Condition #53: Amend the condition to require the bus
shelter to be completed within three years.
f. Condition #54: The applicant shall work with staff to install
appropriate, cost effect security measures pursuant to the
Sheriff's Department letter of June 18, 2003.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN:
None.
E. Environmental Assessment 2002-465 and Tentative Tract Map 301 35; a
request of Dan Jewitt for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration
of environmental impact and approval of the subdivision of approximately
14.69 acres into 47 single family and other common lotS for the property
located at 80-600 Avenue 52.
1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff
report. Associate Planner Greg Tousdell presented the information
Contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Commissioner Quill questioned the grade elevations adjacent to the
Channel/dike, whether or not Avenue 52 was intended to have a
median and if so, is this applicant required to provide future
funding. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the median
would be constructed by The Hideaway project to the south with
Development Impact. Fees. With respect to the elevation
differential between the dike elevation and adjacent street, if there
is inadequate space for sloping, they will be required to construct a
retaining wall. Commissioner Quill also stated the design for the
entry gates and the wall fronting Avenue 52 needs to be
enhanced.
3. Commissioner Tyler stated the staff report mentions a Golf Cart
Path and he was unaware the City had a plan. Assistant City
Engineer Steve Speer stated they would be looking at the stripping
only, whiCh would be a bicycle path at this time. Commissioner
Tyler asked that Conditions #37 and 42 were the same and one
should be deleted. He asked if Avenue 52 was built to City
standards or was it still a rural road. Staff stated the existing
pavement is rural standard, and until the City has a method of
testing the thickness of the road, staff does not know whether or
not it will have to be structurally changed. CommisSioner Tyler
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 7
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
questioned why other developments, in this same area, were
required to construct the road up to the City's standards. Staff
would look into the matter. Commissioner Tyler asked if the
Avenue 52 utilities were to be undergrounded. He also asked staff
if the project was to have a perimeter wall around the entire
project. Staff stated they show a masonry wall around the
perimeter and it is noted in Condition #74. Commissioner Tyler
stated a wall should be constructed along the Channel. Staff
stated the Mountain View project was only required to have a
chain link fence.
4. There being no other questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the
applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dan Jewitt,
the applicant, stated he was available to answer any questions.
5. Commissioner Abels asked the intended use of Lots B, C, and D.
Mr. Jewitt stated they would be retention basins.
6. Chairman Kirk asked the depth of the irrigation pipe lines in the
easements. Mr. Jewitt stated they have seven feet of cover over
an 84-inch pipe line. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant had
considered using the easement for his retention basins. Mr. Jewitt
stated they had considered it, by they decided it made more sense
to take everything to the front of the project. He stated the slope
adjacent to the Channel belongs to the Water District and they do
have a buffer between their roadway and the toe of the slope
which will be heavily landscaped. In regard to the perimeter wall,
they will have a wall around the entire development. Concerning
the gates, they will enhance the entry.
7. There being no further questions of the applicant, and no other
public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing is
closed and open for Commission discussion.
8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Abels/Daniels to adopt Planning Commission
Resolution 2003-048, recommending certification of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental
Assessment 2002-465, as recommended.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Kirk, Quill, Tyler, and
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN:
None.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 8
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Daniels to
adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-049, recommending
approval of Tentative Tract Map 30135, as amended:
a. Condition #37: Deleted
b. Add Condition regarding standard condition for underground
of utilities along Avenue 52.
c. Add Condition regarding upgrading the streets to City
standards for Arterial streets.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN:
None.
E. Tentative Tract Mat) 29053, Extension #3; a request of Trans West
Housing for a third one year extension of time for a tentative tract map
creating 103 single family lots located northwest of the intersection of
Jefferson Street and Avenue 50.
1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff
report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Chairman Kirk asked staff to explain "arrhythmic". Assistant City
Engineer Steve Speer stated that rather than having a uniform
rhythm, it has an A-typical arrhythmic pattern. It means irregular.
3. Chairman Kirk asked why this tract did not have a 50% maximum
turf requirement. Staff stated it did not have the requirement
when it was approved.
4. There being no other questions for staff, Chairman Kirk asked if
the applicant would like to address the Commission. There being
no comments from the applicant and no other public comment, the
public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for
Commission discussion.
5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Abels/Daniels to adopt Plar~ning Commission
Resolution 2003-050, recommending approval of Tentative Tract
Map 29053, Extension #3, as amended:
G :\WPDOCS\PC MtNUTES\7-8-03WD.DOC 9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
a. Condition added.to allow no more than 50% landscaping in
the front yard to be devoted to turf.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Kirk, Quill, Tyler, and
Chairman Butler. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN:
None.
F. Conditional Use Permit 2002-073 and Site Development Permit 2003-
477; a request of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church for a request to
approve development plans for a 3,912 square foot Youth Center to be
located at 46-895 Highland Palms Drive.
1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff
report. Planning Manager Oscar Orci presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the
applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Bob
Ricciardi, architect for the applicant, gave a presentation on the
project.
3. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. Mr.
David Lasaan, 46-885 Highland Palms Drive, stated he was the
owner of the multi-colored home next door to the west of the
Youth Center, he has used the rear yard that was shown on the
Church plans for over 20 years. He has had problems with the
children throwing stones and making noise.
4. Mr. Michael Van Denabel, 46-875 Highland Palms Drive, stated his
opposition to the project. He submitted a petition signed by 30-35
of the residents. He indicated he would like to have peace and
quiet in the neighborhood and the Youth Center was not conducive
to the residential neighborhood.
5. Ms. Rebecca Shields, 46-885 Highland Palms, stated the children
throw rocks over her yard, tease her dogs, and trespass' into her
yard. This should be a single family residence and not a Youth
Center.
6. Mr. Robert Cox, 78-315 Crestview, stated his opposition to the
project as the majority of the access will be from the front and not
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 1 0
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
the parking lot. He encouraged the Church to build the Youth
Center on their existing property.
7. Mr. Ricciardi responded to the comments by stating there would
be no evening classes and they will discontinue the use at 5:00
p.m. He further indicated he would like to keep the entry arches
at 12 feet instead of the staff recommendation of 10 feet.
8. There being no further public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the
public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter
for Commission discussion.
9. Commissioner Daniels stated the use is not compatible as noted by
the comments expressed by the surrounding residents.
10. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Tyler to
deny Conditional Use Permit 2002-073.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels and Tyler, NOES:
Commissioners Abels, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
11. Commissioner Quill suggested potential modifications that would
reduce the impacts on the surrounding residents. He indicated the
traffic should be entirely on the Church property with no access
taken from Highland Palms. In addition, the project should be
redesigned to eliminate the noise problems.
12. Chairman Kirk agreed the project should be redesigned to mitigate
the impacts to the residents.
13. Commissioner Daniels stated that although the layout was good,
the testimony of the neighbors indicated it would be too much of
an intrusion on this residential neighborhood.
14. Commissioner Tyler indicated a Church will generally work with a
neighborhood when a problem has been identified, such as the
incident with the trees. Perhaps the Church may want to take the
information as presented at this meeting and redesign the project
to address the concerns raised. Discussion followed.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 1 1
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
1 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Quill/Abels to adopt Planning Commission
Resolution 2003-051, approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-
073, as amended:
a. The conditional use permit is granted for 90 days.
b. The hours of operation are limited to 8:30 a.m. to 8:30
p.m., seven days a week.
c. The maximum number of children present shall be limited to
30 at any given time.
d. Access to the property shall be taken from the Church
parking lot. Emergency access only can be taken from
Highland Palms Drive.
e. Applicant shall work with the residents to redesign the
project to address the neighbor's concerns.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Quill, and Chairman Kirk.
NOES: Commissioners Daniels, Tyler. ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
16. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Daniels to
continue Site Development Permit 2003-477, to October 14,
2003. Unanimously approved.
G. Plot Plan 83-001; a request of KSL Development Corporation for review
and clarification on the allowed use of the property located at 78-501
Calle Ultimo.
1. Planning Manager OsCar Orci presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the
applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Cindy
Zamora, representing KSL Development, gave a presentation on
the project and stated she was available to answer any questions.
3. Commissioner asked if they would object to constructing a block
wall. Ms. Zamora stated they would not, but the oleanders would
have to be removed and it would aesthetically affect the neighbors
view.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-03WD.DOC 1 2
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
4. Commissioner Quill stated he was employed by Landmark at the
time this facility was constructed and it appears to him that the
use has increased in terms of storage, etc. Ms. Zamora stated
that is true in regard to what was approved. However, it is less
than what was used by Landmark. Commissioner Quill stated he
is not pleased with the level of maintenance and the way KSL has
used their "backyard" in regard to appearance. He is concerned
with the appearance of the facility.
5. Commissioner Tyler asked if .the two homes that abut this facility
were present when. this facility was constructed. Ms. Zamora
stated they were.
6. Ms. Zamora stated no issues have been raised by the neighbors in
regard to aesthetics. 'The neighbors do like the oleanders as it
provides them with privacy.
7. Chairman Kirk asked if anyone else would like to address the
Commission on this issue. Mr. Alan O'Neil, 78-515 Avenida
Ultimo, stated he had several.issues and asked if there had been a
letter written to KSL allowing them to use this facility for storage
only. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated that during the
entitlement process, staff did write a letter limiting the use of the
facility including that no maintenance take place on the site. Mr.
O'Neil stated the oleanders are dying. They were planted when his
house was constructed and were not there when this facility was
constructed. They have contracted the disease that kills the plant
and the worst ones are in front of his kitchen window. Whether
they continue to use the facility or not, they woUld prefer the
oleanders be removed and a wall constructed. He is concerned
about the value of his home. The facility has been a storage
facility since he moved in with very little, or no traffic. Recently,
the traffic has increased and they did voice a compliant with the
City and it has decreased. He distributed pictures he had taken of
the traffic.
8. Commissioner Tyler asked the age of his house. Mr. O'Neil stated
it is six years. Commissioner Tyler stated the applicant had stated
it was constructed in 1983.
9. Ms. Susan O'Neil, 78-51 5 Avenida Ultimo, stated she had worked
for KSL and knew the use of the facility was only storage. In
December, she heard the use would be changed. The 'workers are
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 1 3
Planning C°mmission Minutes
July 8, 2003
cooking in the facility and the gate and cement are in very bad
condition and a hazard to small children. They were told by the
City in December, that KSL was not allowed to use this facility for
anything other than storage and she does not believe that just
because they are KSL they should be able to do whatever they
want.
10. Mr. Joe Garza, 55-550 Calle Quito, stated he tried to park a
couple dump trucks and was told by the City it was not allowed.
He is completely against this use in this location. He presented
letters from other residents objecting to the facility.
11. Mr. Rick Duram, 78-685 Avenida Ultimo, stated it is typical of KSL
{o treat this street as a "third world country". The oleanders have
died down Calle Ultimo. They would like to see the appearance
improved all the way down Calle Ultimo.
12. Mr. Nick Patrinoscar, 78-746 Avenida Tujunga, stated he was
opposed to a maintenance yard in a residential neighborhood. It
will increase traffic and open.the door to allow other commercial
businesses in a Iow density neighborhood.
13. There being no further public comment, the public participation
portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission
discussion.
14. Commissioner Abels stated he would not like to see the use
denied. There should be some conditions placed on the use to
bring it up aesthetically, such as a block wall. The responsibility of
the oleanders should belong to whoever owns the property the
oleanders are on.
15. Commissioner Quill asked if the applicant had been approved for a
conditional use permit. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated it was
approved under a plot plan permit and no time limitation was
placed on the use. The City made the findings that this facility
was appropriate as it was adjacent to a substation and
Washington Street. Commissioner Quill stated he therefore believe
· the site should be aesthetically improved.
16.. Commissioner Tyler stated this is a use that was granted several
years ago and has since changed. The whole neighborhood has
changed. Fuel is stored on site and the guidelines established by
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-03WD.DOC 14
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
the City have been ignored. He has visited the site and saw a
truck having its brakes changed. The site has become a matter of
convenience for the corporation and he thinks the corporation can
do better for the community. This is an improper use in the wrong
location. They need to build a proper building in an appropriate
zone. He would not like to see this body approve the use after all
the violations that have been going on for the last several years.
17. Commissioner Daniels asked staff if it was correct that there were
seven zoning violations. Staff stated that was correct.
'Commissioner Daniels stated that rather than resolve those
violations, they are asking staff to review their request to bring it
into compliance. Staff stated that was correct and went over the
options available to the applicant. Discussion followed regarding
the prior approvals.
18. It was moved by Commissioner Abels to adopt Minute Motion
2003-010 approving Plot Plan 83-001 with the following
conditions:
a. Clean up the site, enclose the property with a minimum 6-8-
foot wall and require a time frame for the work to be
completed within.
19. Commissioner Tyler asked that they comply with the original letter
of approval. Commissioner Abels concurred.
20. Planning Manager OScar Orci clarified the original letter only
required a landscape screen. Commissioner Abels stated the block
wall should replace the cyclone fence.
21. The motion died for lack of a second.
22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Abels to
adopt Minute Motion 2003-010 reconfirming the use as stipulated .
in Plot Plan 83-001 as approved by the City on June 30, 1983,
with the exception that an 8-foot block wall be constructed
instead of the landscaped screen/oleanders.' The City take
whatever measures necessary to see that all safety issues are
addressed.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 1 5
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
23. Chairman Kirk asked legal co.unsel whether or not the Commission
could ask staff to enforce a letter that was inconsistent with the
underlying land use designation of the area. Assistant City
Attorney Michael Houston stated it would be an existing,
nonconforming use. He is unaware of the City's regulations in
regard to the duration of existing nonconforming uses.
24. commissioner Abels asked the applicant for their opinion. Ms.
Zamora stated she did not understand why they would be required
to construct a wall for a facility they would no longer be able to
use.
25. The motion was rescinded.
26. Chairman Kirk explained that if they submitted an amendment to
the Plot Plan requesting permission to use the facility for more
intensive uses, the Commission would want. a block wall
constructed and may allow the more intensive uses, Ms. Zamora
stated she understood this was the purpose of the public hearing.
Chairman Kirk stated that if the applicant offers to build the block
wall, all uses could be interpreted as being in conformance with
the original 1983 letter.
27. Commissioner Tyler disagreed.
28. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Abels to
·
adopt Minute Motion 2003-010 reconfirming the use as stipulated
in Plot Plan 83-001 as approved by the City on June 30, 1983.
Unanimously approved.
VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: None
IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None.
X. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
1. Chairman Kirk asked the Commission pleasure in regard to being dark any
meetings in August. Following discussion, it was determined the
Commission would go dark August 26, 2003.
2. There was no report of the City Council meeting of July 1, 2003.
G:\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD.DOC 16
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2003
XI. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners
Abels/Daniels to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on July 29, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. This
meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 10:24 p.m.
Resp,ectfully submitted,
~~~~v~, ExPo Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
G :\WPDOCS\PC MINUTES\7-8-O3WD. DOC 1 7