Loading...
2003 10 14 PC Minutes MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta., CA October 14, 2003 7:00 P.M, I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Kirk who asked Commissioner Quill to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abels, Rick Daniels, Paul Quill, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Tom Kirk. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston, Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit, Greg Trousdell, Martin Maga~a, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II, PUBLIC COMMENT: A, Mr. Ted Newell, 77-160 Avenida Fernando, La Quinta, asked the Commission to add his request to the Agenda for Commission consideration. He explained he was in the process of purchasing a parcel of land on Calle Tampico for a drive-thru carwash and needed to know if there would, be any objections to his proposed use before purchasing the land. He has two days to complete his due diligence before purchasing. 1. Commissioner Daniels asked if an item could be added to the agenda. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated emergency items could be added to the agenda and explained the process. 2. Commissioner Tyler asked if this was an allowed use. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it is not specifically defined in the Zoning Code as a permitted, or non-permitted use for this zone, therefore it is at the discretion of the Commission. 3. Chairman Kirk stated he was not sure this qualified as an emergency item that could be added to the agenda. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated he would take a short recess and research the issue and bring it back to the Commission. Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: 1. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of September 23, 2003. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 6, under Correspondence and 'Written Items be corrected to read~ 'Mr. Wells Marvin spoke to the Commission regarding the Zoning Code in regard to overhangs and covered walkways. The way the Code is written now, the way you do a covered walkway, the Building and Safety Department charges you a permit as if it were an interior space. Therefore, the permit cost is higher than it would be if it were a trellis. This contributes to bad architecture; people designing buildings that are two feet deep archways to mimic an old archway/walkway. As they designed real archways, they were required to pay extra on their permits as if this was an interior space. They, in turn are not able to charge a tenant for.this space, yet it cost them to build it. This process unnecessarily penalizes people who are trying to do authentic .architecture. Staff explained this was an issue for the Building and Safety Department." There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Tyler to approve the minutes as amended with Commissioner Abels abstaining. Unanimously approved. 2. Department Report: None. Chairman Kirk asked the status of the process to retain a design guideline consultant for the commercial zones. Staff stated' they had spoken to the City Manager's office and it was anticipated a consultant would be hired by the end of the year. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Continued - Site Development Permit 2003-777; a request of St. Francis of Assisi for consideration of a request to allow the demolition of the existing structure and construction of a 3,012 square foot Youth Center end related improvements on a .027 acre site located at 46-895 Highland Palms. 1. Chairman Kirk noted this item had been withdrawn and no action was needed. B. Environmental Assessment 2002-462~ Specific Plan 2002-062~ and Site Development Permit 2002-754; a request of Edward Barkett/Jefferson- Waring, LLC, for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact; review of development principles and design guidelines for a commercial shopping center; and review of development c..twr~c~{~f:;~PC Minutes\10-14-O3WD.doc 2~ Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 plans for a 50,000 square foot market, 1 8,432 square foot drUg and retail store, 20,970 square feet of retail shops, 10,000 square foot restaurant uses, and a 3,000 square foot gas station, to be located at the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Martin Maga~a .presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the 'no build zone" was a new requirement. Staff stated no. It is a requirement of the Uniform Building Code as a fire buffer for any building over 50,000 square feet, Commissioner Quill explained this was an issue regarding building materials. Staff confirmed.. The request is to restrict the use of a portion of the property to the west which belongs to the City to prevent the City from constructing any buildings in this location in order to maintain the buffer. The applicant is therefore requesting a covenant, or some type of document, be recorded whereby compensation will be made to the City. 3. Commissioner Daniels asked staff to explain where the building had been previously lOcated on the site plan. Staff indicated the location changes on the site plan. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to indicate where the 150-foot line from Fred Waring was located. Staff indicated 'where it would fall on the site plan. Commissioner Tyler asked if the applicant had any objections to moving the loading docks. Staff stated they would let the applicant address this question, Commissioner Tyler asked that the deliveries for the market be restricted as well. Staff noted the Specific Plan did not list any time restrictions for the market. Commissioner Tyler asked that they be added. He also asked if the 92KY power lines could be undergrounded. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated Imperial Irrigation District will not accept them to be undergrounded as they are not equipped to handle them. The City Council has made a determination that if the 92KY poles stay up, anything hanging on them could remain. 5. Chairman Kirk asked staff to explain the underground retention facility. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the City is not opposed to undergrounding retention basins, but does have some concern about how to keep it from silting. Chairman Kirk asked G :\WPOOCS\PC Minutes\ 1 O- 14-03WD.doc Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 staff to explain what uses were included in this site development permit. Staff explained it included the drug store, market and retail shops. It does not include the restaurants and gas station. 6. Commissioner Tyler asked about the circulation for the gas station. Staff explained a throat was required to allow better access to the gas station from of Jefferson Street. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern was a vehicle entering from Fred Waring Drive and traveling through the parking lot to get to the gas station. 7. Chairman Kirk asked if the access from Fred Waring Drive was as close to the intersection as it could be, or could it be closer. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer explained it has to be 250 feet back from the intersection. To move it would take it out of alignment With the rest of the center. A repeat customer will find the quickest way in and out of the center to the different uses. 8. Commissioner Tyler asked what portion of the paving of Jefferson Street was the responsibility of this applicant. Staff stated they will pay a cash fee for the outside 20 feet, and they will construct the sidewalk, and perimeter landscaping. They will make no improvements to Jefferson Street except for their connection. Jefferson Street will be improved under the Phase II plans for the Jefferson Street improvements. 9. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr, Keith Gregori, Dudek Associates, engineers for the project, stated the underground retention basin is an approved and better retention basin than previously used and gave an explanation. The Public Works Department is conditioning them to add filters to handle any unwanted debris. There are a series of manholes for maintenance. In regard to the loading dock, it was originally facing further north and became a visual issue for Fred Waring Drive and therefore, moved further south. It could be moved back toward the north so as not to conflict with the truck traffic. The truck traffic would enter off the most westerly drive from Fred Waring Drive and exit the same way. The proposed landscaping plans were approved by the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC) requests. In terms of the delivery times, staff has placed them in the staff report. All on- site power lines will be undergrounded. The on-site gas station circulation is primarily off of Jefferson Street. Landscape islands should prevent vehicles from crossing through the parking lot. G:\WPOOCS\PC Minutes\lO-14-O3WD.doc 4 Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 1 0. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked about the additional landscaping requested by the ALRC. Mr. Gregori stated that to the west, the City park is typically five feet above this site and then there is an eight foot wall, so the rear of the building is somewhat obscured. 1 1. Commissioner Quill stated he finds the eleVation to the west a greater concern as there is a park next door. 12. Mr. Edward Barkett, owner of the property, stated they have been working with staff to address their issues. It is their impression that with the landscaping and wall, the rear elevation is fine as designed. Their. biggest concern is a limitation on the delivery hours for the market. If they were placed on the project it would be a detriment to the market operations. 13. Commissioner Daniels asked if there was any objection to moving the trash enclosure. Mr. Barkett stated that as long as the trucks are able to make that turn, they have no objection. 14. Commissioner Quill asked about the rock wainscott on the base of the building. Mr. Wasero, architect for the project, stated the idea is to create a stone veneer to break up the stucco. 1 5. Commissioner Daniels questioned the truck circulation in regard to the loading dock. Also the location of the trash compactor. Mr. Gregori explained with the buildings being moved further south, there was not enough room to turn the trucks around. 16. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment; there being none, the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 17. Commissioner Tyler asked about the secondary City gateway sign. Staff explained the General Plan does not give any specifications for the sign and the applicant is only required to provide the land and maintain the landscaping until the City installs the sign. Commissioner Tyler asked if pedestrian accessways could be provided for the residential properties to the west. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\ 10-14-03WO.doc 5 Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 18. Commissioner Daniels stated he would be concerned'with trUck loading area. He would want to minimize the impact of the southwest corner of the site to move the activity out of this area and more to the north end. This would eliminate the need for any restriction on delivery times. 19. Commissioner Quill stated he has a concern with the 'south and west elevation, the loading dock and requiring the. lighting to be hooded so not to flood the backyards of the adjoining .properties. He agrees pedestrian access on the southwest portion of the. site would be a good idea if it could be worked out. 20. Chairman Kirk asked if there was a need to reach a legal - agreement between the City and the applicant on a covenant/easement. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated yes. That before recommending approVal to the City Council consideration should be given to the constitutional prohibition against the use of public sources and public funds for private purpose without compensation. An easement, or other interest in a public park, would be included in that. So should the Commission be disposed to go along with this type of scenario, it should be noted that some sort of compensation or other meaningful exchange is necessary to comply with the constitutional restrictions on local government actions and should be documented in a particular type of document sufficient to the City Council. He would recommend a restrictive covenant which would prohibit the use of the property for a particular purpose, meaning that it should be kept open so the developer cannot claim enforcement rights, to the detriment of the City. Chairman Kirk suggested that instead of seeking a financial payment, ask the applicant to fund an extension of the pedestrian access through the wall to the site. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated yes, as long as it is crafted correctly. The key is that the area of the park that is restricted for the benefit of the developer is not done for free, but some type of compensation is made. Discussion followed. 21. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Abels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-076, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-462, as submitted. ~:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\lO-14-O3WD.doc (~ Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Daniels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-077, recommending approval of Specific Plan 2003-062, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 23. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-078, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2003-754, as amended: a. Condition added: A covenant shall be entered into between the City and the developer for some means of compensation whether financial or by means of providing pedestrian access from the park to the Center in the southern portion, and landscape design shall accommodate this access provided as well between Buildings I and' 2. This shall be done to the satisfaction of .the City Council with no use of public funds. b. Condition added: The truck access and loading docks shall be moved to the north and minimize any truck traffic to southwest corner of the site. c. Condition added: Stone veneer shall be added to the bottom of the facade on the south and west elevations. d. Condition added: The applicant shall work with staff to improve the design and south and west elevations. e. Condition added: Hooded lighting or some other form of reducing light glare shall be considered on the south end of the site to prevent any glare to the homeowners to the south. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. Chairman Kirk asked the Assistant City Attorney if he had reached a decision regarding the request to place an item on the agency as an urgency item. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston explained there were two exceptions G :\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\ 10-14-03WO.doc '~ Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 whereby an item could be placed on the agenda and based on those exceptions his recommendation is that this request would not qualify, On a two-thirds vote an urgency/immediacy item could be placed on the agenda. Following discussion, it was determined this request would not be added to the agenda. C. Sign Application 2002-618~ Amendment #2; a request of Stamko Development Co. for consideration of an amendment to a planned sign program for the shop buildings sign regulations for the property 'located on the south side of Highway 111, between Adams Street and west of Dune Palms Road. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the publiC hearing and asked for the S{aff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a coPy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions' of staff. Commissioner Daniels asked if the third building would have signage. Staff stated yes. This would double the signage, but the number of buildings has increased. Discussion followed regarding the signage allowed on each of the buildings. 3. Commissioner Tyler reviewing signs on other Marshalls and PetsMart buildings in other cities in the Coachella Valley questioned the need for the PetsMart sign on the rear of the building as it would not be visible from Highway 111. Discussion follOwed regarding what signs had been approved for the site. 4. Chairman Kirk asked what property was to the east of the site and why was there a need for signage on the east elevation. Staff explained the property to the east is owned by Joe Hammer and family and is currently vacant. In regard to the signage, this was a question for the applicant. 5. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Russ Beckner, representing the applicant, gave an explanation of the request, and stated he was available to answer any questions. In regard to the .signs on the east', these buildings do not face Highway 111 and viSibility is important to the tenants. The property to the east is commercially zoned property and this is in keeping with the overall site. The monument signs will only have signage for Marshalls and WalMart. G :\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\ 1 O- 14-03WD.doc Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 6. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler questioned how the PetsMart sign on the rear of the building will be seen when it is recessed behind the Marshall's building. Mr. Beckner stated it is important to PetsMart. 7. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Kirk asked if there was any'other public comment. There being none, Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 8. Chairman Kirk stated the maximum letter height on these is on par with some of the largest buildings such as WalMart and asked if this was appropriate. Commissioners agreed with the height. Commissioner Tyler stated he had reviewed the signs on other Marshalls and PetsMart buildings in other cities in the Coachella Valley. Chairman Kirk stated he is concerned with the east elevation signage. If it is important for visibility, they it should be seen and be attractive. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Daniels to adopt Minute Motion 2003-O1 6 approving Sign Application 2002-618, Amendment #2 as recommended. Motion passes with Chairman Kirk and Commissioner Tyler voting no. D. Development Agreement 2003-007; a request of Centex Destination Properties for consideration of a Development Agreement to establish operational guidelines for a proposed 280-unit residential resort development on 44.61 acres as required by Condition 14 of City Council Resolution 2003-065, for the property located northwest of the intersection of Eisenhower Drive and Coachella Drive. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Oscar Orci presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition #14 which requires the applicant to enter into an agreement with a local hotel for only ten years and the Development Agreement is in effect for 50 years. G :\WPOOCS\PC Minutes\ 10-14-O3WD.doc Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 . What happens when the one disappears? Staff stated the purpose of the 50 years is to protect the revenue rights. This agreement would satisfy the 10 year requirement in Condition #14. Commissioner Tyler asked what the mitigation 'fees were mitigating. Staff explained they are mitigating the' fact that this project was developed under the Tourist/Commercial designation, but the project is in fact, individually owned; therefore, in order to make certain the City receives the revenue due under that designation, it is important to see that the units produce the revenue. The. concern was that the units could be used as individual dwelling unit. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if the CPI adjustment was tied to the 1982 - 1 984 Index. It was explained that this was the name, not a year. 4. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Olivia stated he was available to answer questions. 5. There being no questions of the applicant, and no other public comment. Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion.' 6. There being no discussion, it was moved and secOnded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler t© adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-079 recommending approval of Development Agreement 2003-007, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. E. Site Development Permit 2003-786; a request of Washington 111, LTD for consideration of development plans for two commercial buildings located on the south side of Highway 111, west of Adams Street within Washington Park. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. G :\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\ 10-14-0 3WD.doc 10 Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked that Coachella Valley Unified School District be removed from the conditions. 3. Commissioner Daniels asked why all the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC) conditions were not included. Staff stated they are material changes only and would not affect the look. 4. Chairman Kirk asked if stacked stone differed from stone veneer. Commissioner Quill answered no; it is just the way it is laid in. 5. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Michael Kareti, architect for the project, stated that in regard to the ALRC conditions, he believes they have addressed them in their revisions, but would like to be relieved of the condition requiring the stacked stone and steel trellis. They are trying to maintain a uniform look as well as not having to incur the added cost of the light-weight steel for the trellis feature. 6. Mr. Bill Sanchez, owner representative, stated the building permits have been pulled on two of the earlier buildings and to require them to use the stacked stone at this time would be a financial hardship. 7. There being no questions of the applicant, and no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 8. There being no further discussion, It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-080 approving Site Development .Permit 2003- 786, as amended: a. Conditions #50 & 51: deleted . ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. G :\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\ 1 O- 14-03WD.doc ~[ ] Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 F. Sign Application 2003-725; a request of Superior Electrical Advertising, Inc., for McDonalds Restaurants for consideration of a deviation frOm the 111 La Quinta Center Sign Program to allow non'Channel letters for the property located at 78-962 Highway 111. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the .public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked how the pre-sale signs would fare in the intense heat. Staff explained the material to be used. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. George Tadros, one of the co,owners, stated the new sign is smaller than the existing signs and questioned why he would have to remove the logo sign. He went on to explain the need for the freestanding signs. 4. Mr. Roy Ramirez, representing Superior Electrical Advertising, Inc., the sign company, stated the menu signs already have a shield on them for protection against the weather elements. They are reducing the square footage and would like to retain the logo cabinet sign. 5. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Quill asked why they were changing the sign. Mr. George stated it is getting old and the script lettering is no longer associated with McDonalds. 6. There being no further questions of the applicant and no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Abels to adopt Minute Motion 2003-018 approving Sign Application 2003-7 25, as recommended. Unanimously approved. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\10-14-O3WD.doc 12 Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003' 8. Sign Application 2003-727; a request of Paragon Signs, Inc., for Dr. Matt.hew Werner for consideration of a sign program for 47- 250 Washington Street for the property Iocated'on the east side of Washington Street, north of Omri & Boni Restaurant. 9. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a-copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 10. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Dr. Werner stated he was available to answer any questions. 11. There being no questions of the applicant and no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 12. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded .by Commissioners Tyler/Daniels to adopt Minute Motion 2003-019 approving Sign Application 2003-727, as recommended by staff for both buildings. Unanimously approved. G~. Zoning Code Amendment 2003-077; a request of the City for consideration of an Amendment to the La Quinta Zoning Code pertaining to the Water Efficient LandScape Ordinance. 1. Chairman Kirk'opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Oscar Orci presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development.Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Quill asked if there is any opportunity for a variance to these requirements. What would a developer do if he could not meet the requirements? Staff stated it is reviewed on a project by project basis. Commissioner Quill asked how this would.apply to a golf course. Staff stated they have to conform and can meet the requirement by varying their plant palette and irrigation methods. 3. Commissioner Quill asked if both the City and CVWD have to review and approve the landscaping plan. Staff explained yes, both agencies will review the plan, but it is a joint effort between the two. G :\WPDOCS\PC MinUtes\ 10-14-03WD.doc 13 Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if there was any public comment. 5. Commissioner Quill thanked Mr. Robbins, General Manager for CVWD, for the recent signing of the QSA to secure water usage for the Valley for many years to come.. Mr. Robbins,. CVWD, thanked the Commission for their support and stated the approval of this Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance is an integral part of continuing the Valley's lifestyle with responsible water usage. It does not apply to the individual home builder, but to the tract developer. In regard to variances, there is .no allowance, but the different uses have different water allowances. 6. Chairman Kirk asked how much more restrictive Palm Desert's Ordinance was than what is proposed here. Mr. Robbins stated about 10% more restrictive. 7. Mr.-Ed Kibbey, representing Building Industry Association, stated they had worked with CVWD and City staff in the formation of the Ordinance and supports its adoption. 8. There being no further public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the matter for discussion. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-081 approving Zoning Code Amendment 2003- 077, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES' Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None H. Zoning Code Amendment 2003-076; a request of the City for consideration of an Amendment to certain sections of the Zoning Code pertaining to front and side yard setbacks as well as home sizes within residential zones. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Commissioner Tyler stated that due to the stated position of the City Council at the last joint meeting, he would move to table any further discussion regarding this subject. Commissioner Abels seconded the motion. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\lO-14-03WD.doc Planning Commission Minutes October14, 2003 2. There being no further discussion and no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, .and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: X. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: 1. There was no report of the City Council meeting of September 16, 2003. XI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Quill to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on October 28, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, --~~utiv~~S~cretary (~¢~yer,' Exec · City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\10-14-O3WD.doc ~[5