2003 12 16 CCCity Council Agendas are
Available on the City's Web Page
@ www.la-quinta.org
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, December 16, 2003 - 2:00 P.M.
Beginning Resolution No. 2003-1 19
Ordinance No. 396
CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call:
Council Members: Henderson, Osborne, Perkins, Sniff, and Mayor Adolph
PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed
on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to
three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium.
CLOSED SESSION
NOTE: Time permitting the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during
the dinner recess. In addition, persons identified as negotiating parties are not invited into
the Closed Session meeting when the Agency is considering acquisition of real property.
1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/DISMISSAL/RELEASE
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.
- PURSUANT TO
City Council Agenda 1 December 16, 2003
2. CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, JERRY HERMAN,
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 1 1 1 AND LA
QUINTA DRIVE (APN: 649-030-055). PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: ROBERT
CRAIG MANIACI.
RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear
within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete
a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
Please watch the timing device on the podium.
For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to
speak" form should be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council beginning
consideration of that item.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
PRESENTATIONS
1. PRESENTATION BY THE FRIENDS OF THE LA QUINTA LIBRARY
WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE - NONE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 18, 2003
2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 2003
City Council Agenda 2 December 16, 200;
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved
by one motion.
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED DECEMBER 16, 2003.
2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2003.
3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE & EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31,
2003.
4. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PASSES TO THE 2003 SKINS GAME
GOLF TOURNAMENT AT TRILOGY AT LA QUINTA.
5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A CASH DONATION FROM THE
FRIENDS OF THE LA QUINTA LIBRARY FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA LIBRARY
BUILDING.
6. APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE ADAMS STREET AT
WESTWARD HO DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT, PROJECT NO. 2002-06.
7. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WTH TRACT NO. 24890-6,
CITRUS, BROOKFIELD HOMES.
8. ADOPTION OF FACILITY USE POLICIES.
9. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTING THE DESERT
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT'S BOND CAMPAIGN AND BOND MEASURE
SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 2, 2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTION.
10. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAVID EVANS
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE WASHINGTON STREET MEDIAN ISLAND AND MEDIAN ISLAND
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT 2003-09.
11. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY BERTHA SANCHEZ - DATE OF LOSS:
NOVEMBER 16, 2003.
12. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE ACCOUNTING MANAGER
TO ATTEND THE 2004 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS
(CSMFO) ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FEBRUARY 28-
MARCH 2, 2004.
13. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL DISTRICT INFORMATION SHEETS FOR THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NOS. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1, AND 97-1 FOR
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2003.
3
City Council Agenda 3 December 16, 2003
14. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL CONTINUING DISCLOSURE FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
2000-1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2003.
15. APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR
THE USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR
RECONSTRUCTION OF EISENHOWER DRIVE, AND PUBLIC SERVICE FUNDS FOR
THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — LA QUINTA UNIT.
BUSINESS SESSION
1. CONSIDERATION OF REFURBISHMENT OPTIONS FOR THE VILLAGE PARKING
LOT, CONSENT TO USE OF FUNDS FROM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECT
AREA NO. 1, AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a).
A. RESOLUTION ACTION
B. MINUTE ORDER ACTION
2. CONSIDERATION OF RED LIGHT VIOLATION SIGN INSTALLATION.
A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION
3. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN THE SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS
PROGRAM.
A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION
4. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SETTING THE TIME AND
PLACE FOR A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT.
A. RESOLUTION ACTION
5. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING (MOU) ON THE COACHELLA VALLEY FRINGE -TOED LIZARD
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN REGARDING "MEASURES TO MINIMIZE AND
MITIGATE TAKE OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY FRINGE -TOED LIZARD" TO
PROVIDE AN EXTENSION OF THE CURRENT MOU UNTIL MARCH 15, 2005.
A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION
City Council Agenda 4 December 16, 2003
6. CONSIDERATION OF INTERVIEW SCHEDULE FOR GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT
FIRMS FOR SILVERROCK RANCH.
A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION
7. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION, SELECTION OF MAYOR
PRO TEM TO SERVE A TERM AS PROVIDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 98-109.
A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION
8. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 393 REPEALING
AND REPLACING SECTION 6.08.050 OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DISTURBANCES BY CONSTRUCTION NOISES.
A. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 393 ON SECOND READING
9. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 394 APPROVING
AMENDMENTS TO SECTIONS 9.160.020 (TABLE 9-17.7), 9.40.040 (TABLE 9-1),
9.60.100 AND 13.12.160(B) OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE (ZOA 2003-
079).
A. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 394 ON SECOND READING
10. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 395 APPROVING A
REVISED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA AND CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC (DEVELOPMENT .
AGREEMENT 2003-006).
A. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 395 ON SECOND READING
STUDY SESSION - NONE
REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (PERKINS)
2. CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS
3. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS
4. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (OSBORNE)
5. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS)
6. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF)
7. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (OSBORNE)
8. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (HENDERSON)
5
City Council Agenda 5 December 16, 2003
9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY
HENDERSON)
10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION (ROBERT TYLER)
11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON)
12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (HENDERSON)
13. SAN JACINTO/SANTA ROSA NATIONAL MONUMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
(HENDERSON)
14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (ADOLPH)
15. ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER
5, 2003
16. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTE FOR OCTOBER 16, 2003
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. CITY MANAGER
A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
B. GRANT UPDATE FOR 2003
2. CITY ATTORNEY
3. CITY CLERK
A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2003
5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2003
6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2003
7. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - NONE
A. SALES AND USE TAX CONFIDENTIALITY
8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2003
9. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FOR NOVEMBER, 2003
10. FIRE CHIEF'S QUARTERLY REPORT - NONE
MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS - NONE
RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
RECESS TO 7:00 P.M.
rMITil :2 ►v, I
PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda.
Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes.
Please watch the time clock on the speakers podium.
G
City Council Agenda 6 December 16, 2003
PRESENTATIONS
1. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE
COMMISSIONER MIKE DAVIS.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
TO FORMER COMMUNITY SERVICES
For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed
with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor
will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the
appropriate time.
Any person may submit written comments to the La Quinta City Council before a public
hearing may appear and be heard in support of, or in opposition to, the approval of
project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any project(s) in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing.
1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND AN
ORDINANCE ON: 1) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-483 TO CERTIFY A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; 2) GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-093 AND ZONE CHANGE 2003-116 TO CHANGE LAND
USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED/REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND
RELOCATE THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DESIGNATIONS, ADD GOLF
COURSE DESIGNATIONS, AND ELIMINATE THE MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITY
DESIGNATION; 3) CANCELLATION OF WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT FOR 195 ±
ACRES; 4) SPECIFIC PLAN 2003-067 FOR DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR TWO 18-HOLE GOLF COURSES, ASSOCIATED
FACILITIES, AND 1,400 RESIDENTIAL UNITS; AND 5) SITE DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT 2003-787 FOR DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR TWO 18-HOLE GOLF
COURSES, ASSOCIATED FACILITIES, AND 1,400 RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 60 AND
MONROE STREET. APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC.
A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S)
B. TAKE UP ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE
FURTHER READING
C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING
City Council Agenda 7 December 16, 2003
2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND AN
ORDINANCE ON: 1) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-485 TO CERTIFY A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; 2) GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-095 TO AMEND CHAPTER 2.0 OF THE GENERAL PLAN
TO ALLOW HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE COMMERCIAL ,PARK LAND
USE AREA; AND 3) ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2003-078 TO AMEND TABLE 9-5
OF SECTION 9.80.040 OF THE ZONING CODE TO PERMIT HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL USES IN A COMMERCIAL PARK DISTRICT SUBJECT TO REVIEW
AND APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. APPLICANT: CITY OF
LA QUINTA.
A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S)
B. TAKE UP ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE
FURTHER READING
C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING
3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND
AN ORDINANCE ON: 1) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-479 TO CERTIFY
A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; 2)
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-094 AND ZONE CHANGE 2003-115 TO
CHANGE LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS FROM COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL; AND 3) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348 TO SUBDIVIDE 37.72
ACRES TO ALLOW 72 LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 46-201 WASHINGTON STREET. APPLICANT: MADISON
DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S)
B. .TAKE UP ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE
FURTHER READING
C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council to be held on January 6,
2004, commencing with closed session at 2:00 p.m. and open session at 3:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253.
ral
City Council Agenda 8 December 16, 2003
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Phyllis Manley, Deputy City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the
foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, December 16, 2003,
was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on
the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630
Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, December 12, 2003.
DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2003
PHYLLIS MANLEY, Deputy City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
Public Notices
The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special
equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-
7025, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be
made.
If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council,
arrangement should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777-
7025. A one (1) week notice is required.
If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council
meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be
supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the
beginning of the 3:00 PM session or the 7:00 PM session.
City Council Agenda 9 December 16, 2003
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE:
Demand Register Dated December 16, 2003
T 0
4tit 4
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION
CONSENT CALENDAR
STUDY SESSION
PUBLIC HEARING
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated December 16, 2003
BACKGROUND:
Prepaid Warrants:
56459 - 565271 263,608.01
Wire Transfers) 1,091,157.70
P/R 31625 - 317391 1819056.81
P/R Tax Transfers) 54,020.32
Payable Warrants:
56528 - 566741 1,142,434.18
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Demand of Cash -City
Demand of Cash -RDA
$2,732,277.02
$1,498,440.28
$1,233,836.74
John M. Falconer, Finance Director
10
CITY OF LA QUINTA
BANK TRANSACTIONS 11/26/03 - 12/09/03
12/05/03 WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA $8,461.31
12/05/03 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION $6,067.00
12/05/03 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $14,317.84
12/05/03 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS HEALTH INSURANCE $45,038.21
12/02/03 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $94,000.00
12/02/03 WIRE TRANSFER - LAND PURCHASE $262,189.91
12/02/03 WIRE TRANSFER - LAND PURCHASE $246,534.49
12/02/03 WIRE TRANSFER - LAND PURCHASE $249,415.13
12/02/03 WIRE TRANSFER - LAND PURCHASE $76,133.81
12/09/03 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $890000.00
TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $1,091,157.70
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE-'AP5005
CHECK
REGISTER
2:02PM 12/09/03
CITY OF
LA QUINTA
BANK
ID: DEF
PAGE 1
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
PAYMENT
NUMBER
DATE
NO.
NAME
AMOUNT
***NO CHECKS
WERE USED
FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.***
56528
12/09/03
&02150
TED HARTNETT
550.00
56529
12/09/03
&02151
MARGARITA HERNANDEZ
4.00
56530
12/09/03
&02152
JENNIFER KNAPP
3.50
56531
12/09/03
&02153
ROBERT O MAYER
3.50
56532
12/09/03
&'02154
RANCHO SANTANA
350.00
56533
12/09/03
&02155
SIGRUN BRAVERMAN
60.00
56534
12/09/03
&02156
TRAVIS CRITTENDEN
30.00
56535
12/09/03
&02157
JOYCE DAWSON
40.00
56536
12/09/03
&02158
ANGELA DUNLAP
40.00
56537
12/09/03
&02159
NORM EASTWOOD
60.00
56538
12/09/03
&02160
MARCANNE GREEN
40.00
56539
12/09/03
&02161
SANDRA HARP
60.00
56540
12/09/03
&02162
SARAH JALLINOJA
120.00
56541
12/09/03
&02163
ROBERT LOPEZ
50.00
56542
12/09/03
&02164
RON MENDELSBERG
60.00
56543
12/09/03
&02165
ROSALINE MORCUS
60.00
56544
12/09/03
&02166
ADELE SIMMONS
60.00
56545
12/09/03
&02167
ELVIRA STARK
60.00
56546
12/09/03
&02168
BILLIE VILLASENOR
60.00
56547
12/09/03
&02169
SUELLEN WEIR
60.00
56548
12/09/03
&02170
JAKE EAGAN
30.00
56549
12/09/03
&02171
MARIA RODRIGUEZ
50.00
56550
12/09/03
ACE050
ACE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
184.40
56551
12/09/03
ADT100
ADT SECURITY SVC INC
489.14
56552
12/09/03
ALC050
BOB ALCALA
56.00
56553
12/09/03
AME002
AMERICAN CHEMICALS INC
300.65
56554
12/09/03
ANW100
AN-WIL BAG CO
801.66
56555
12/09/03
ARC100
ARCH
1985.29
56556
12/09/03
AVA100
AVAYA INC
754.49
56557
12/09/03
CAD010
CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY
230.65
56558
12/09/03
CAL140
CAL CONTRACTORS SUPPLIES
317.54
56559
12/09/03
CAL237
CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT
94.50
56560
12/09/03
CAL240
CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS
902.00
56561
12/0.9/03
CAN300
CANON FINANCIAL SVC
1026.14
56562
12/09/03
CAP050
ROSMARY HEIM CAPUTO
392.00
56563
12/09/03
CAR070
CARDIFF LIMOUSINE INC
719.71
56564
12/09/03
CAR100
CARDINAL PROMOTIONS
86.20
56565
12/09/03
CAR300
CARQUEST
41.88
56566
12/09/03
CDS100
CDS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
612.55
56567
12/09/03
CDW050
CDW GOVERNMENT INC
429.93
56568
12/09/03
CLE075
CLEAN ENERGY
104.27
56569
12/09/03
COM015
COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 1525.00
56570
12/09/03
CVP100
CV PARTS & SUPPLY
512.10
56571
12/09/03
DAN150
DANIELS TIRE SVC
1713.26
56572
12/09/03
DEP150
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
175.00
56573
12/09/03
DES018
DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
581.27
56574
12/09/03
DESO47
DESERT PHOTO LAB/STUDIO
64.63
3 40
ACCOUNTSPAYABLE
- AP5005
CHECK
REGISTER 2:02PM 12/09/03
CITY OF
LA QUINTA
BANK
ID: DEF
PAGE 2
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
PAYMENT
NUMBER
DATE
NO.
NAME
AMOUNT
56575
12/09/03
DES051
DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL
780.00
56576
12/09/03
DES060
DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO
170.33
56577
12/09/03
DES065
DESERT TEMPS INC
2536.68
56578
12/09/03
DES085
DESERT VIEW TREE SVC
5000.00
56579
12/09/03
DET200
DETROIT INDUSTRIAL TOOL
884.77
56580
12/09/03
DIE050
DIETERICH POST
48.26
56581
12/09/03
DKS100
DKS CONTRACTING & ENG
166538.87
56582
12/09/03
DUD100
DUDEK & ASSOCIATES INC
3569.54
56583
12/09/03
DUN200
KATHY DUNHAM
939.55
56584
12/09/03
ECS100
ECS IMAGING INCORPORATED
9150.81
56585
12/09/03
EVA050
DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC
13213.79
56586
12/09/03
EXP200
EXPRESS DETAIL
860.00
56587
12/09/03
FED010
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
149.09
56588
12/09/03
FRO100
TOM FROST GOLF INC
922.50
56589
12/09/03
GAL075
JOSE GALARZA
150.00
56590
12/09/03
GAS100
THE GAS COMPANY
8014.89
56591
12/09/03
GCS010
GCS WESTERN POWER & EQUIP
93.43
56592
12/09/03
GOD100
GERARDO GODINEZ
30.00
56593
12/09/03
GRA010
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO
158.47
56594
12/.09/03
GUM050
BRAD GUMMER
231.00
56595
12/09/03
HAR100
JOHN HARDCASTLE
30.96
56596
12/09/03
HEN100
HENRY'S GLASS CO
75.00
56597
12/09/03
HIC200
RENE' HICKEY
199.50
56598
12/09/03
HOM030
HOME DEPOT
1183.83
56599
12/09/03
H00050
FAYE HOOPER
90.00
56600
12/09/03
HOU100
HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS INC
1050.00
56601
12/09/03
IND030
INDIO SHOE STORE INC
.186.41
56602
12/09/03
INT004
INTELLICEPT
2872.03
56603
12/09/03
KEI010
KEITH COMPANIES
23657.53
56604
12/09/03
KIL100
KILLER BEE SWARM REMOVAL
149.00
56605
12/09/03
KIN100
KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG
9765.28
56606
12/09/03
KRI100
BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION
8965.00
56607
12/09/03
KUS100
KUSTOM IMPRINTS
159.09
56608
12/09/03
LIP100
LORI LIPSMAN
23.80
56609
12/09/03
LOP200
JUAN PABLO LOPEZ
120.00
56610
12/09/03
LOR100
LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES
538.00
56611
12/09/03
LOW100
LOWE'S COMPANIES INC
1.19.91
56612
12/09/03
LUN050
LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP
57043.71
56613
12/09/03
MAR045
SALLY MARSHALL
396.50
56614
12/09/03
MAS200
FRANCO MASSINI
30.00
56615
12/09/03
MEE100
WAYNE MEEDS
120.00
56616
12/09/03
MEN040
RUBEN M MENDOZA
150.00
56617
12/09/03
MOB200
MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES
224.97
56618
12/09/03
MOR175
SCOTT MORRISON & ASSOC
1420.00
56619
12/09/03
MUN010
MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC
2729.61
56620
12/09/03
NEX010
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
1794.93
56621
12/09/03
NIC101
NICKERSON & ASSOC INC
11019.08
56622
12/09/03
NUN100
ANICETO NUNEZ
300.00
56623
12/09/03
OFF005
OFFICE DEPOT INC
586.82
4 13
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE - AP5005
CHECK
REGISTER 2:02PM 12/09/03
CITY OF
LA QUINTA
BANK
ID: DEF
PAGE 3
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
PAYMENT
NUMBER
DATE
NO.
NAME
AMOUNT
56624
12/09/03
PAL400
PALMER COURSE DESIGN CO
200000.00
56625
12/09/03
PIT100
NOEL PITTMAN
259.00
56626
12/09/03
POW351
POWER PLUS
350.00
56627
12/09/03
PSO100
PSOMAS
15422.76
56628
12/09/03
RAL050
RALPHS GROCERY CO
13.95
56629
12/09/03
RAM175
GUILLERMO RAMOS
60.00
56630
12/09/03
RAS020
RASA - ERIC NELSON
1921.00
56631
12/09/03
RIV021
RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITOR
130.00
56632
12/09/03
RIV100
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS
339082.02
56633
12/09/03
RIV110
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS
3422.40
56634
12/09/03
RIV130
RIVERSIDE CNTY PURCHASING
13.50
56635
12/09/03
RUT050
RUTAN & TUCKER
86528.70
56636
12/09/03
SAL155
SANTOS SALAS
120.00
56637
12/09/03
SAX100
SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE
2940.00
56638
12/09/03
SCI100
LOUISE SCIUTTO
120.00
56639
12/09/03
SEL020
SELECT FIRST AID
18.32
56640
12/09/03
SIE075
SIERRA LANDSCAPE CO INC
3630.00
56641
12/09/03
SLO100
SHARON SLOANE
257.60
56642
12/09/03
SMA010
SMART & FINAL
155.58
56643
12/09/03
SOU008
SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE
215.50
56644
12/09/03
SOU009
SOUTWEST AQUATICS INC
368.00
56645
12/09/03
SPE070
SPENCER FLOORS INC
7947.61
56646
12/09/03
STA045
STAN'S AUTO TECH
414.77
56647
12/09/03
STA049
STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTGE
1068.68
56648
12/09/03
STE003
M W STEELE GROUP INC
38823.46
56649
12/09/03
STE008
FRANK STEIN NOVELTY CO
156.95
56650
12/09/03
STUO10
WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD
504.00
56651
12/09/03
SUL100
SULMEYER, KUPETZ, BAUMANN
58.31
56652
12/09/03
SUP050
SUPERIOR READY MIX CONC
3638.08
56653
12/09/03
SWR100
SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE
7406.00
56654
12/09/03
TAG100
TAG/AMS INC
50.00
56655
12/09/03
TEM100
TEMECULA COPIERS
110.50
56656
12/09/03
TH0125
LORNA THOMPSON
224.00
56657
12/09/03
TRA007
TRAFFEX ENGINEERS INC
7253.43
56658
12/09/03
TRE020
JULIO TREJO
60.00
56659
12/09/03
TRIO10
TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC
34264.50
56660
12/09/03
TRI100
TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS
270.00
56661
12/09/03
TRU010
TRULY NOLEN INC
163.00
56662
12/09/03
UND010
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
77.00
56663
12/09/03
USB050
U.S.BANK TRUST NATL ASSOC
1530.00
56664
12/09/03
USB150
US BANK N A
18504.32
56665
12/09/03
USP016
US POSTMASTER
150.00
56666
12/0 M)3
UST050
U S TOY CO INC
139.08
56667
12/09/03
VCA100
VCA CODE GROUP
3681.00
56668
12/09/03
VID050
VIDEO DEPOT
35.82
56669
12/09/03
WAL010
WAL MART COMMUNITY
109.84
56670
12/09/03
WEB150
WEBSITES 2000
1140.00
56671
12/09/03
WIR100
WIRELESS WEST
80.86
56672
12/09/03
WLC100
WLC ARCHITECTS INC
1722.14
fl
5
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE - AP5005
CHECK
REGISTER
2:02PM 12/09/03
CITY OF
LA QUINTA
BANK
ID: DEF
PAGE 4
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
PAYMENT
NUMBER
DATE
NO.
NAME
AMOUNT
56673
12/09/03
W00100
DEBBIE WOODRUFF
390.60
56674
12/09/03
XER010
XEROX CORPORATION
2637.70
CHECK TOTAL
1,142,434.18
15
6
01
O
N
M
lD
H
N
M
V'
Ln
r
H
N
N
N
N
O
F
z
M
O
rn
o
H
N
x
CD
OD
OD
W
OD
CD
co
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
a
r-A
H
r-1
H
H
H
H
1-4
'-1
H
H
a s
H
F
F
F
F
F
ElF
F
F
E-+
E-E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r+
E-,
o
Ln
o
0
0
0
o
O
0
0
W
z
o
v
ri
cri
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ln
tD
M
sr
a�
�D
tD
O
,n
M
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0`
o
0
0
0
0
0
Ln
Ln
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
M
to
>4
>4
u')
%D
a'
"'
a
a
a
`r'
W
a
a
0
o
w
w
o
E
a
o
a
z
�
o
ar
a
a
�i
a
4
.aa�
�i
a
Z
z
F
H
F
4
F
H
F
F
H
FO
W
F
U
Z
4
F
cn
�L
F
cn
F
cn
F
v�
F
O
W
F
to
F
U)O
Ho
40
go
�
H
O
In
O
COO
cn
O
O
O
O
O
fn
O
cn
W
H
0
E4
F
F
F
F
F
F
a
F
�
H
a
F
�
F
�
F
a
E+
�
F
a
H
W
w
a
U
a
Q
a
U
a
w
a
U
a
U
a
U
0c
U
a
U
a
U
a
U
O
H
O
O
Ca
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
z�
zz
zz
zz
zz
zz
zz
zz
zz
zz
zz
zz
z
H
W
a
w
D
w
0
w
'�
w
a
w
0
w
�
w
a
W
a
W
a
w
M
w
�
w
w
>
w
>
w
>
>
w
>
r94
>
w
>
w
>
w
>
w
>
w
>
w
Q
W
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
W
x
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
UW
in
u')
�r
c
H a
a
to
OD
OD
M
H
H
H
O
> )
',�
(>a
O
O
O
O
H
Ln
O
C1
M
OD
C
M
m
m
N
V�
H
CDO
cP
a%
O
d'
H
H Q
H
z
a
0
H
N-
H
O
H
of
��
In
lt7
In
tf)
Ln
Ln
Ln
Q
►]
a
a
a
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
w
x
w
m a
1 0
0 w
H
a
U')
H
H
H
un
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
C
H
H
H
C
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
r�
M
M
M
M
cn
O
Cl
O
O
Cl
O
O
J
H
C1
01
M
H
00
l�
t`
[�
OD
t`
OD
z
sr
M
M
M
d'
M
M
M
f+M
M
M
M
F
Z
o
o
O
o
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
O
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
0
O
O
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
O
in O
F
z
N
w
a
x
>4za'
Q
w
aa'
W
Q
H
a
z
3
w
z
Q
g
w
a
W Ea•
a z
H
}i QI
a
F
F
pH
a
U
a
H
z
o
a
w
cn
W.
U
m
O
a>
U
H
FC
Q
W
U
Q
► a
W
w
z
FC
U
ca
cn z
Ew-�
h
a
vHi
zW
z
v
z 0 >
C)
O N
U F
U
O
to
H
N
O
H
LO
H
N
O
N
Ln
H
N
O
M
to
H
N
O
C
Ln
H
N
O
Ln
ua
H
N
O
lD
Ln
H
N
O
4a
LO
H
N
O
La
OD
Ln
H
N
O
�
D>
LO
H
N
O
La
O
tD
H
N
O
H
tD
H
N
O
U
7
OD
m
O
r-1
N
M
V'
LO
ri
N
M
r-1
O
E+
Z
M
O
ON
� N
N
x
L)
OD
OD
OD
OD
OD
m
OD
O
01
01
01
d
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
iW7
a
r-1
H
r-1
H
H
rl
H
rl
r♦
r-1
rl
E
rl
E
E Q
ca
E+
E
H
H
E
E
E
E
H
E
a a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
rI
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
2
p
/y
U-)t0
lD
�
l0
to
t0
M
U7
Co
lD
y,
O
rt
H
N
a
O
o
Cl
O
O
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
v�
t0
N
U)
t0
t0
t0
t0
tD
1.0
M
U7
OD
r♦
rl
H
H
O
a
�
�a
�
�
a
�a
�
�
a
�
w a
Q
a
•
H
H
z
E
m
E
cn
E
cn
E
U)
EH
to E
cn E+
v) E
to
H
to E
O
W
O
H
O
E
m
O
EH
v)
O
E
Un
rC�
O
E
cn
O
H
to O
q E
Cl) O
E-H
v) O
E-H
cn
O
E
cn O
E
94 O
E
E+
a
0
U
a
c
a
rrU-a+
a
L)
a
rUl a
L) a
L) a
c
a
Hc.� x�
a s
cn
>
>a
g
g
z
z
Q°Q
z
z
Qo
z
z
Q8
z
z
Q8
z
z
QQ
z'z
QQ°
z z
z z
z
z
z z
z z
a z
H
to
W
a
w
a
W
a
w
a
W
w
o W
D w
CD
W
a W
a W
a w
w
>
w
>
w
>
44
>
w
>
>
w >
w >
w
>
w >
w >
a >
Q
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
a
x
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
cn
W
O
U
OD
H Q
m
0
Oj 1
>
ro
IA
U)
m
01
O
r-I
(N
OD
U-)
7.
z
m
aW
1`
-W
Ln
u')
Ln
Ln
uO
r,
o
rn
H Q
H
J
ri
O
r-4
ri
r 4
V-4
rl
ri
N
O
O
l-
►-1
z
U)
U7
1n
U7
U)
N
U)
U7
Ln
U)
1—
0)
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
IV
to
H .Y.
a
w
ao a
1 0
O w
H
p4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
r
o
w
O
o
O
o
Co
O
Cl
O
O
o
lw
pq
o
O
O
o
o
O
o
O
o
o
OD
tc
OD
M
OD
OD
OD
OD
CD
OD
r-
M
M
0)
z
M
t0
M
(n
M
m
M
M
M
l0
O
O
Q'
N
N
C
tD
E
z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
�T
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U')
Ln
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
L)
r-1
ri
rl
r-I
rl
rl
rl
Q,
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r♦
H
rl
r 1
H
r-1
r-1
ri
H
r♦
ri
rl
a
U
a
z
M
W
H
0
p
cn
U
Da
cn
O
a
z
"aa'
H
N
owa
x
a
>+
1
H
W
Cl)
O
O
a
H
w
z
H
H
a
E
E
H
H
a
o
w
E
E
H
3
Q
U)
a
w
A
h
a
>
a
A
U
Iz-1
O
EF
z
W
z
H
to
RC
W
z
w
rzi
W
s
x
a
S
U
o
z
0
o
a
H
a
�Wf
FC
x
U
A
w
z
a
a
a
a
w
x
w
ti
Q
O
>
N
M
V'
U)
W
OD
a%
O
rl
O
O
,z
D
t0
t0
l0
W
t0
lG
t0
tC
r-
N
O
O >y
r-1
ri
r♦
ri
r1
rl
rl
rl
O
ri
U [-+
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
E
V H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�i L)
w
W
La
W
ca
c
W
%ri
W
W
V
k0
r-
'OD
0%
O
H
N
M
N
N
M
N
-wP
N
d'
to
l0
M
N
lO
N
N
N
EE+
Z
M
0
rn
0
M
N
x
U
OD
OD
OD
N
OD
N
OD
N
O
N
V'
N
C
N
O
N
O
N
tp
N
M
N
M01
N
N
OD
N
OD
N -
r-1
N
H
N
r-1
H
'-d
ri
r 4
r-4
r-1
-4
H
ri
H
r 4
H
ri
H
ri
E 4
r-4
E+
H
H
H
H
E
Cq
H
E+
H
H
H
H
H
H
a a
0
0cv)
Co
O
0
N
Ol
10
�!
-I
O
1-
H
O
%D
O
to
O
O
r-i
H
W
z
O
O
O
M
O
�O
O
ri
d'
O
00
to
OD
H
M
H
l�
1
�'
01
O
00
0
1n
r-
r--1
Lf)
O
M
O
OD
OD
ON
to
OD
H
r
M
H
�
�
H
a
�r
r--1
o
O
U')
lO
10
rn
N
rn
V'
�
uoi
Ol
OD
t0
O
ri
O
'
L�
OD
'd'
Ln
O
M
1`
H
4
al
sT
M
OD
(Il
r-
N
M
H
H
zr
w�
4
z
0
0
0
0
c. 0
0
0
0
W
0
H
>
V)
0
E-+
04 E-H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
"
w
�+
; C4
H
w 04
04
U
>
CS
a
Vgg)
v)
fI1
V)
0
v) x
cn x
x x
z
a
H
"' 0
Qa
a
H 0
a 0
0
px
w 0
Fa'
�d
a
s
dF' 0
H 0
H 0
c
Z
U
IZ
F� z
[�
a z
.4 z
z
W
z
W Z
C4
0
0
fj+
0
Lz+
0
w
0
44
o z
W W
a z
a W
z z
w W
H
z
H
W
0
w
H W
a W
w
a>
W
U)
W
>
z W
0>
k+
H
H
H
H
H
H>
a >
W >
a
W
A
U
>
Q
V) >
z
a>
D
co
4
x
z
z
z
z
z
z
.D
>
0
V)
H
V)
Q
as
a
a
O
m
J
cn
0
E14
O
`N
l�
N
H A
C4
OD
(n
U)
O
rI
> 1
>
CO
to
O
In
Ol
M
OD
00
M
M
ON
N
1-
DD
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
C
M
cr
M
1.0
Ln
N
O
1l
(n
HA
H
H
z
d'
0
r-
m
O
e-I
lY)
O
M
H
u')
M
Lf)
M
Lo
M
V'
to
qw
Io
V'
Ln
rq
lO
W
r-1
N
N
Q
lO
U)
r.G
r-1
:E
N
ri
r-4
r-4
'-i
r4
r-1
►7
cr
M
H ,Y.
a
as
w
ao a
1 0
0 44
H
x
o
o
N
Ln
o
w
o
0
0
0
0
o
t`
o
M
W
(Q
O
O
sP
w
01
1n
N.
OD
M
OD
tO
W
o
l0
O
O
O
co
o
Cl
0
O
0
O
a
O
tr
OD
O
O
V'
lO
0
M
Ol
Ol
M
M
to
0)
1-
r-
1-
1-
1-
1-
M
O
Ln
d'
ON
O
z
O
{�
O
lO
O
�0
O
l�
O
1�
M
�0
O
lO
.-1
lO
r-1
tO
rA
lO
r-1
lO
r-1
tp
r-1
tO
l�
lO
lO
z
0
%0
In
N
o
N
o
a'
In
M
Ln
M
Ln
M
Lo
o
Ln
un
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
cn
Ln
l�
Ln
0
10
N
N
C
IV
r-1
r•1
M
d'
C
M
d'
C
sP
H
M
U
U�
ri
0
H
0
-1
O
H
O
r-i
Co
r-1
O
ri
o
ri
0
H
0
H
0
.--1
0
r-1
0
.--1
0
ri
Cl
r-7
O
r-4
O
H
r 4
r-1
ri
H
ri
H
H
H
r-1
H
r-1
r-1
r-4
ri
H
V)
U
a
a
H
0
a
a
a
a
a
a
x
U'z
z
w
a
a
a
a
a
ai
H
a)
�
m
a)
W
v)
w
a
a
a
0
o
�
0
o
a
-+
ms.,
x
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
E
E
U
U'
44
W
. W
44
EL4
44
U
9
~
u
L)
U
4
°4
H
�
0
a
a
s
z
Czc
a
uU
�4 01
U)�
�
H
H
rt;
H
H
H
E-H
E 4
H
w
w
a
a0
H
H
W
W
U
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
H
a
m
z
0
0
0
z
Q
pp��
Q
>
rt;
4
U
4
U
Q
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
H [v
z 0
W
>
O
O
O
N
CDO
O
O
O
CD
O
O
O
O
t�
O
'J
0>4
O
H
O
H
Un
O
O
o
O
r-1
O
r-1
O
r 4
r-4
O
r-i
O
r-1
O
ri
O
r-4,
O
ri
O
r-1
N
N
a
U H
U H
H
A
H
A
U
a
W
3
U
oc
rt:
>
A
A
rC
A
A
FC
A
RC
A
�C
a
a
Q
a -/
1
9
1-
N
OD
N
h
10
01
N
O
m
H
M
N
M
Ul)
W
h
OD
M
lM
C
M
M
Ea
O
z
O
0)
C-)
x
N
H W
U
E
O
N
r A
00
N
H
01
N
H
qw
N
r-4
O
N
H
co
N
H
O
N
H
O
N
H
C
N
1-1
C
N
r-I
N
H
N
H
O
N
H
O
N
H
aa
a4
F
.Er
E-4E+
HE-4
E+
EA
E-4E-4E+
E-4
E-4
E-4
Co
0
H
E-4
0
O
0
O
0
O
H
O
r
N
ao
OD
%V
O
Q>
N
O
r 1
w
i+
z
D
0
O
W
H
h
O
H
m
LO
C
1p
N
O
N
01
M
01
H
r
l0
OD
H
C
N
wU-)
In
O
01
N
cr
cr
O
H
to
N
N
N
H
t')
a
O
O
V'
H
O
O
H
r
O
N
OD
OD
U-)
In
M
01
h
N
O
O
cV
O
01
1D
N
O
r-1
N
0)
M
z 01
O H
H r
E+
10
OD
U)
E-1
H
d
N
H
01
N
'd'
c
O
H
t17
N
L
r 1
H
w
Q
z
z
cn
sS; FC
a
h
O 4
4.
H
U RC
FC
W
rj,
O
H
H
H
W E-4
W O
a E-4
E-1
O
E-4
a
E-4
O
E+
EE
Ei O
EN
E+ E-1
U O
W E-4
E+
O
E-+
E-4
O
Ei
a Ei
a 0
E-4114
a E•
D O
EA
E-4
O
O E-4
H
O
a
H
z
H
z
H
z a
H o
cn
a
O
El
U
a
O
O a
H O
U a
z O
cl) a
w 8
cn
W
cn
W
a
O
O
o a
M O
a s
W O
E-1 a
U o
>
z
H
a
U
w
4
E-1
z
4
E+
z
4 A
E-4 z
z
a
w
H
A
z
W
DO
a
E-4
z
W
ma
a z
a W
Ho
z
W
H U
o z
04 W
HHO
o
G+
o
W
z
W
H A
z
►7 W
.7 A
w z
W
DO
a z
E-4W
cn >
a
o
w
A
a
0
a
0
D
0
a>
O
co
z
>
U>
x
>
a
a>
D
a
D
a>
D
A>
aw
cD >
z
z
O
EA
rn
w
w
w
U
H
w
oU
m
W
to
x
U
H
U W
H A
> I
a
W
N
M
H
to
to
m
M
t0
U')
OD
M
M
N
H
sT
O
O
h
qw
OD
M
W
r
O
H
O1
O
H
M
H A
H
A
H
z
N
N
M
N
N
M
N
N
M
H
N
O
01
V'
N
Ul
%0
M
r-1
h
d'
N
H
N
H
H
W
h
O
H .Y.
a
as
w
m a
1 0
o w
E-4
a
w
(�
M
sp
l0
M
cW
l0
O
O
O
a
O
t0
N
0)
tf)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
H
OD
O
O
O
H
H
OD
-W
%D
N
(A
to
h
d'
OD
'J
z
01
O
01
Co
01
O
M
O
m
O
M
O
M
O
cn
O
M
O
H
O
m
O
01
H
O1
O
(M
O
E-
z
D
O
r
LO
M
r
to
M
V'
LO
C
M
Ln
1-4
N
O
N
M
u')
N
a
L
(n
r
to
M
N
O
LO
H
O
C
N
O
N
H
O
u')
N
O
N
M
LO
V'
U
U
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
O
H
H
O
H
H
O
H
ri
O
H
r-1
O
H
N
0
try
H
0
ri
N
O
U')
H
O
U')
ri
O
H
ri
O
H
o
a
cn
a
U)
a
U
z
H
U
H
a
E-4
w
U
rn
H
z
E-1
E-1
U
H
0Ul)
N
a
8
a
8
a
8
w
H
E
o
a
o
s
H
z
z
a
a
a
a
U
o
O
a
s
a4
a
cn
W H
A
H
a
H
a
H
a
W
x
rH1
as
0
L)
w
zw
C4
>
w
w
D
w
H
D
Q. OI
0
H
0
0
o
�+
w
w
a
z
a
U)w
w
w
o
w
o
O
t,
Ei
a
w
a
a
H
H
o
01
Q
Q
A
A
o
>
E4 w
z
w
U
U
U
U
a
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
z 0
p
0 }H
H
>
O
a
N
o
a'
N
0
sr
N
�
0
o
M
0
Ul)
O
4
o
r
O
°0
�
O
O
H
Cl
O
M
0
O
H
Q
0
o
H
Q
o
N
O
o
an
h
O
A
LO
r 1
O
o
o
0
H
>
4U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
1 p .19
W
1-
01
In
tD
r
OD
0)
O
H
N
M
V'
0
W
O
t-
in
in
M
M
M
M
M
C
V'
sr
v
C
v
r-1
a
H
O
Z
m
O
Ln
N
x
U
00
OD
V'
OD
00
00
OD
OD
OD
OD
O
O
O
O
00
V
O
r1 W
E-t
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
r-I
r-1
H
H
H
r-1
r-1
H
r4
ri
r1
H
H
H
H
E
rq
H
E
a w
q
H
H
EH
E
E
H
E
E
H
E
E
H
0
0
1�
01
O
O
.-1
l0
OD
U)
O
M
O
N
tD
O
N
O
1�
r-1
E
OD
M
O
O
to
1-
1-
O
O
M
V'
1-
M
a
r,
O
1-
z
O
N
M
O
1n
O
O
ri
OD
01
O
00
O
V'
D
O
M
O
1-
OD
01
M
N
00
r-
01
01
m
V•
M
O
OD
00
M
Cr)
e-1
rM
ri
tD
to
N
1-
in
Co
0
a
O
t0
O
M
O
M
co
r-I
N
CD
N
t0
O
M
t0
O
r l
O
tD
00
!`
M
O
to
H
Ol
N
O
Ln
r-i
E
E
U)
CO
O
O
a
a
E
E a
a
0
0 a
w a
a
a
a
Z
H
Car
O H
H
a
a E
rC E
z H
U
U
U
U
U H
Z E-H
W
H
E-1
E 4
a
a H
E
Z
Z E-1
co O
D EH
O O
H E
>
fn
>
>
lA
>
0
> O
cn E
H O
E
W
a
x
0G
O
Oa
a o4
E-1
Q
L?
iU-i >
aa
a
a
zz0
0
n�
a
UL)
H
HOU
a
0H
zCL
cHoo
U)U)z
HHz
EEZ
wwZ
aZ
U z
99W
�
� z
m
zU
1-4
U)
z
W
W
W W
y4
x
x
x W
a
as W
H W
W W
H
H
H
E
H W
W W
w
>
a
C4 >
00
�'
cD
(.D >
U)
w>
U>
M>
z
Z
z
z
Z>
w>
a
q
H
H
O
O
H
H
Z
Z
4
D
O
O
O
O
O
04
4
W
H
E
co
cQ
a
s
H
H
Cra
v)
U
u
U
U
U
E
W Ga
ri
H 0
0;
in
a)
r
r
O
> 1
>
m
O
O
W
01
N
N
0)
01
l0
in
t0
m
1-
In
N
z
z
E
O
O
O
r-1
O1
01
a'
V'
V'
Ln
In
m
01
.-1
O
O
H Li
H
D
O
O
(1r)
M
O
O
O
O
O
r-1
r-1
r 4
O.
4
O
V'
OD
a
H
z
to
W
Ln
in
r-i
H
O
O
O
U)
H
1-4
.-i
r-I
r-I
M
V)
U)
U)
to
u)
00
q
M
M
M
M
M
a
w
w
an x
1 0
0 w
E
04
0
o
to
tD
r�
o
M
o
Co
10
o
0
0
o
ao
�
W
Ln
Ln
CO
OD
V'
IV
O
11n
O
O
M
0
0
0
0
N
V'
(�
t0
W
to
an
OD
O
O
un
O
O
in
O
O
O
O
W
OD
a01
01
01
01
m
M
M
01
m
ri
o
Ln
Ln
to
0
r♦
M
z
r-I
r-1
O
O
O
O
O
O
r 1
in
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
t0
tD
tD
w
1`
r-
W
W
t0
W
to
tD
410
W
t0
t0
1-
E+
z
r..1
r i
r-1
ri
V'
V'
t0
1-4M
N
M
0
O
Co
O
O
Ln
In
Ln
N
9)
O
wn
ul
to
in
Ln
Ln
Ln
0
Ln
In
M
M
V'
1w
V'
r-
N
N
M
V'
V'
V'
V'
V•
V'
U
r-1
r-i
r I
r 1
r 1
r-1
r�
H
r♦
. I
. I
r I
ri
r-1
r♦
r 1
H
O
O
o
0
O
O
o
0
o
O
o
0
0
(D
0
o
O
v)
to
-4
1-1
. 1
r-I
r-1
V'
H
r-1
.1
r 1
r i
ri
r-1
r-1
-4
a
0
0
cxi
a
>4
H
H
U)
0
a
z
cw)
0
a
w
U
a
U
EO+
H
H
a
s
E
E-1
W
H
>
W
0
U)
Cl)
Cl)
rn
\
\
Gu
U)
h
H
H
U
U
U
U
U
W
H
w
>>
U
U
z
a
z
z
z
z
z
w
a
W
U)H
H
a
GZi
H
H
H
H
H
W4
E•H
a
00
HH
a
H
a
wW
00
U)
v)����
f
a
W
U
U
E
H
q
04
a4
a
a
a
3
0
a
H
H
H
E-H
W
W
O
O
z
z
1:
z
£
2:
2:
W E
E
Hz
Z
a
s
x
x
D
W
W
W
W
W
H
H
14 z
W
W
a
134
U)
U)
H
H
H
H
H
>
D
U)
a
co
s
2:
E
E
E
E
H
E
H
H
E
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
a
w
w
04
W
a
W
04
W
0c
w
x
w
a
W
W
w
W
w
z
w
z
w
W
w
W
W
0
a
zz
a
s
to
U)
w
U)
cn
U)
W
w
0
w
w
w
w
w
U)
w
V)
w
H
W
U)
z
A
A
w
q
W
q
w
q
W
G) .
W
Q
W
A
W
A
W
q
A
g
A
A
q
A
q
o
>
o
O
O
o
OD
OD
1�
r
,-r-I
0
�n
�n
In
an
u�
In
o
,n
in
in
In
,..+
H
�
�
,n
tD
tD
tD
tD
tD
tD
OD
o
0 >4r-I
ri
r♦
H
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
a
a
U)
U)
U)
U)
U)
U)
w
W
0
w
w
U)
E
H
W
W
W
w
W
W
w
w
W
w
W
w
W
w
A
w
q
q
A
Q
A
q
q
A
A
G1
C]
A.
g
A
q
Q
11
20
z
rpy4
.1
'i
co
cF
N
ri
M
r-I
im
aT
d'
�--I
O
If)
.-1
1n
LO
N
1n
tD
r l
r
r-1
M
LO
lw
U')
H
z
M
Cl
rn
.
N
W
W
U
[-�
vw
N
00
N
N
N
OD
N
d'
N
OD
N
00
N
�I'
N
O
N
C
N
V
N
O
N
0o
N
rC
W
1-4
H
r-I
H
ri
E
H
H
.--4
E
r-I
E
ri
E
r♦
H
ri
E
H
H
ri
E
r-I
E
H
H
r-1
E
a
a
CD
0
E
kp
N
r
00
M
OD
r-I
r
U7
U)
r-1
00
r
0)
N
00
O
O
O
O
O%
O
O
O
O�
m
Wz
'a
OD
V
00
M
ri
U7
r
r-i
01
M
O
U-)
01
M
O
M
O
M
Cn
N
N
O
LO
V'
r I
'}I
a
O
to
�D
U7
M
CA
r-I
m
0)
r
N
LO
V'
C!'
.--I
O)
ri
O
OD
a
�
r
r
VD
N
r-I
r
co
-r
LO
LO
N
OD
CA
r
o
o
rn
o
o
in
O
o
OD
00
er
Cp
(n
U
01
U kD
0;
(n
O
In
M
ri
O
W
C)
C
N
U N
O
N
O
LO w
V)
U) M
E-H ON
M
aD
ri
rn
H
rr-I
(9
c7
W
W
U)
U
U
H
H
W
Q
W
H
U
H
E
H
a
a
a
w
a
a
o
a
�
a a
a
a s
w
U a
U)
.
a
a
rC
rC
H
W
V) Q
RC
W 4
4
W
H
RC
Q
W
H Q
C9
z
O
E+
O
E
O
H
FC,
E-+
O
z
O
z E 4
O O
E+
O
H
W O
a
W
a E
W O
]C
Cl)
z
H
H
O
E
O
z E
O O
U E
H O
rC
W
H
E
E
E
E
U
U H
W
H
x H
H
H E
FC
E+
E
U E
w E
a
H
a
a
(n
a
w
a
x
x a
COE
C4
H o:
W
W C4
3
a
a
x a
O x
a
S
S
a
8
"
z' S
S
S
w S
""
S
a
a
S
; S
" S
a S
a
>
z
U
z
A
z
H
z
z
a
z
W z
U
U z
U
U
z
�C z
z
W
w z
U W
H
w
H
W
W
a
W
w
W
W
H
W
W W
' >
H
H
H W
H
H
w
H
w
W
H W
o
o
w
o
�>
CO
a>
a
a
U)
z>
Cl)
z>
H
U
U
>>
a
x
cn
W
a
a
UW
, I
10
O
H
A
o;
t0
Nr
r
o
N
-4
O
O
�
>z
>
z
��'
N
M
M
N
Ln
ur)
00
O)
N
H
A
H
H
`J
?.
tM
O)
OD
O
O
O
O
r
ri
In
M
u)
M
u7
to
Ln
U7
OD
Q1
O)
d'
N
(a
If)
O
N
N
M
r♦
.-1
N
N
C
(31
1D
H
aC,
a
ao
W
c�
a
O
o
w
H
o;
w
o
o
M
un
o
o
o
O
N
ON
o
O
0
o
0
o
.-+
u)
r-1
Ln
0
O
o
o
rn
00
M
U
pq
o
Ln
o
O
Ln
o
O
o
W
%D
o
o
Ln
Ln
r
On
Ln
Lo
ON
Ul)
CI)
om
O1
CA
U')
Un
rn
M
z
sr
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
ko
r-I
ko
r-I
w
sr
O
w
O
O
H
zN
O
fM
M
N
H
U)
Q1
H
r-i
M
M
M
O
Z)
N
N
N
N
O
O
N
M
O
O
in
N
U)
N
O
v
r
r
r
N
N
r
to
u7
Lf)
r-I
r
N
r
U
U
rC
r-I
o
r-4
O
ri
i
o
r
o
r-I
O
ri
O
r I
0
r-I
0
r-I
0
r-4
CD
r-I
O
ri
o
H
O
ri
o
ri
qr
'a'
'd'
ri
r-I
C'
V'
U)
Ln
e-1
1w
A
,
W
U
U
U
U
H
H
a
O
w
W
W
W
0
Cl)
0
W
O
U
z
H
H
0
a'
()
"'
H
U
i
W
"'
W
Enw
H
H
W
a
o
r
z
A
w
A
x
W
E
U
c�
FC
FC
z
H
a
a
a
o
w
�,
A
w
w
�
U
a
°a
a
�+
ci
W
U
x
x
Y+
H
A
A
W
W
w
C7
rC
a
aG
O
H
W
O
w
A
W
A
x
E
cn
H
>>
H
4
oG
a
x
PG
s
x
W
A
W
E
O
W
(A
O
W
aC
07
A
z
H
Q
a4
A
O
A
O
A
U
W
A
A
W
W
w
E
h
E
p
>
O
O
0
0
O
O
0
0
O
Cl
O
O
In
O
0>4
u)
O
o
r-I
Cl
r-I
o
r-I
0
N
o
r-I
u)
O
u')
O
O
N
CD
N
ri
O
o
ri
Ir
O
o
H
U
H
W
(n
A
A
z
U)
FC
r.0
a
x
s
x
A
W
O
04
a
�
RC
Q
U
A
Q
Q
A
A
W
W
W
W
W
w
w
C7
(7 e
12 1
Z
OD
LO
01
O
OD
OD
Cl
1f')
O
ko
H
N
H
W
N
\O
.I
ri
N
H
M
1-4
vow
H
14
H
h
-4
to
H
LO
rl
pry('
H
O
z
M
O
C1
N
h
U
C1
O
C1
C1
OD
cM
OD
OO
N
V'
N
OO
N
O
N
C1
N
Cl
N
01
N
01
N
C1
N
C1
N
01
N
H
N
r♦
N
H
N
r 4
N
H
N
r•I
N
r-I
N
ri
H
r-I
r-1
r-1
r-I
r-I
H
H
r-1
H
r-I
H
ri
E+
E
r�
Zia
H
H
F4
H
H
H
H
H
H.
E 4
E-4
E+
E-I
H
H
a
a
o
0
M
O
N
N
O
O
l0
01
O
O
O
h
a1
O
Cl
N
W
Cl
h
N
OD
C1
V
O
OD
In
r
t0
OD
M
O
H
H
Wz
M
O
O
O
N
V'
lD
H
M
O
fn
10
h
C 1
On
N
V'
N
N
OD
-W
.--I
LO
t0
01
h
lD
h
r♦
OD
O
LO
ri
H
C1
M
M
N
H
r1
0
M
M
O
h
O
l0
O
O
OD
o
er
o
rn
0
LO
4
r1
ri
C1
o
M
ao
LO
,-a
o
M
4 Lr
W h
rn
Cl
O
fn
N
cD
a
a
H
a
o
a
z
Q
w1.4
z
H
a H
U H
E-H
H
H
a. H
E+
O
O
W O
H O
O
O
O
W O
O
W
H
H
W H
[*+ H
H
a E+
H
H H
a
H
a
u
l
O a
ca
H a
a
W a
HH
a w
cn
O
w
w
w
w
O
H
O
O
$
w
Wu
U O
w 0
On
U QW
U
Do
O w
HHHHHHHHHH
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
>
z
a
U
C]
z
[-4 0
W z
(1,'
w z
H
a
H
.a z
Ma
a z
FC z
U z
a
z a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
H
O
W
w w
U W
a
a WE-4
W
W W
H W
E-H
W a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
W
>
a>
U>
a
a>
cn >
.a >
>>
w>
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
D
a
O
A
A
H
H
z
a
p
p
a
AD
A
U)
N
fn
fn
to
O
H
E
U
H
fn
fn
fn
In
fn
!n
O
W
U)
W
rX4
H
A
a
N
�--1
h
NW
M
w
O
r-I
e-4
LO
%�
w
'-I
O
h
r-1
O
r
W
co
Cl
O
to
U1
>
1
h
C1
O
OD
r-1
ri
h
O
0
N
lG
O
01
'-i
en
N
O
r1
O
N
O
H
A
z
H
E
r:)
I!')
aLr).
lt7
ko
r-I
M
r-I
O
cM
. I
r-I
O
N
r1
Ln
ri
N
O
(M
r-I
U )
r1
r-I
O
Io
ri
H
z
O
H
O
r-1
OD
N
h
V4
sY
rM
C1
co
V'
O
O
a
po
w
m
a
1
0
0
w
H
p(
M
01
V'
h
N
O
O
N
e-1
h
h
r
r
r
h
r
h
h
94
Io
OD
M
V'
C1
O
O
Cl
r-4
v
V'
V'
v
v
v
v
v
v
(�
W
•n
O
OD
an
O
O
to
w
O
O
w
OD
w
O
O
O
O
aC1
01
M
CY)
C1
h
r-1
Ol
r 4
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
z
ri
O
O
O
O
M
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
�o
to
E-+
z
t)
ri
O
M
N
M
Ln
M
N
M
10
LO
10
r
LO
N
O
sr
LO
M
Lo
w
LO
V'
U)
a
V)
CM
N
a
Vo
V•
LO
V
LO
V'
Vo
0
LO
N
V'
V'
N
M
M
N
U
(J
Q
-
r-I
O
r1
O
ri
o
ri
o
r-I
O
ri
O
ri
O
r♦
O
r-I
o
ri
0
r-1
0
ri
0
r4
0
ri
0
r-I
0
ri
0
f-1
0
ri
0
LO
r 1
r 1
ri
r I
ri
r-I
ri
ri
r1
r 4
r 4
r-i
r-I
ri
r-I
rq
rq
a
H
L)
a
W
w
O
O
M
H
H
O
Ln
Oa'
o
w
pA4
a
a
Cl)
1
p4'
H
O
cHn
O
uHi
O
W
U)i
U
x
H
H
H
E-I
H.
H
EE+
H
H
H
w
14
E-I
W
Cry
U
U
A
(9
U
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
n
p
E+
[-IQ1
I
3
HHz
x
a
z
W
z
W
W
W
W
E
W
W
W
W
W
W
ate'
0
W
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
z
c�
c�
x
h
x
a
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
�p
W
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r0
r1
O
r-I
O
r♦
O
U)
O
O
r 4
O
H
O
N
m
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
0
U
>I
H
O
(n
r-1
A
rC
rC
E
z
U
E
O
E
O
O
O
E
O
E
O
E
OO
E
E
O
U
H
U
O
Z.
�
U
0
7
`' �'
13
'may
OD
01
O
M
Vr
LO
lO
r
C
e-1
w
m
tD
O
H
N
r
M
r
V
r
to
r
H
H
N
%D
%D
OD
N
w
r
r
(RAC,
O
H
Z
l'M
O
01
O
\
N
OD
x
U
O)
Oh
m
OD
Co
OD
co
OD
O1
0)
O
N
OD
N
OD
N
OD
N
O
N
OD
N
OD
N
O
N
H
N
N
1-4
N
ri
N
r-I
N
r-1
N
r-1
N
H
N
ri
N
H
N
r-4
'-4
rq
ri
ri
H
H
H
r4
a
A
.--I
H
H
H
E-H
H
H
H
E-4
E-+
E-4
H
E-4
H
H
H
H
H
H
Ow
0
0
r
o
Ln
o
0
0
�-+
M
o
M
Ln
o
o
N
r
w
r
H
w
r
o
0
0
0
0
0
r,
E 1
W
'Z,
rn
Vw
r
C 1
o
V
O
O
o
O
o
O
a
w
N
r
Ol
r 1
w)
O
Ln
Ol
M�Kr
4
Cl
r
O
O
1n
N
O
w
x
D
O
M
O
O)
LO
M
O
r
OD
H
r
OD
V)
w
d'
ri
Ol
O
m
O
r
O
H
M
>r
0
H
N
r-1
N
M
r-1
ri
ri
H
(V)
w
a
N
M
O
O
H
M
M
O
O
OD
O
O
V'
O
L
O
N
(4
O
O
w
N
(n r
O)
r1',
H
Q
H
a
gc
a
L
00
Ol
V)
co
ri
r
U 9)
V'
Hay
N
w M
a4
a
U
U
w
H
N
O
U
Lip
E
a
H
C4
zzz
z°z>
A
A
a
U) 4
aa (ri
H
H
H
H
(i
z
E4
H
z
O
Ri,'
E+
H
C4
W H
Z H
Q E4
a'
d'
d'
d'
A
H E+
O
O
a
W
W
0
0
O
U
O
0
a O
O O
> O
O H
O
o
O
0
O
0
o
o
A
O
W O
W H
P4
W
H
H
a H
W E4
cn H
a E4
0
U E-E
E
N
N
N
N
04
H
U
H
V)
U)
0
H P4
P4
W
H
w
E-H
O z
H z
x P4
W 04
\
\
\
\
a
M O;
(1)
U'
H
a
U)
P4
pQ
p
pp
0 0
w O
v p
A
a p
Q
a
w
a
w
a
W
a
W
A
0 0
o A
W
P4
Z
H
>
Z
p;
U
H
a
H
a
H L1
a z
D Q
w Z
W
V)
A
W z
m A
Z
a
W Z
z
z
Q
A
A
A
RC
N
H
v)
as
a
s
E-E W
W W
a4 w
>>
EAW
W
>
W
>
W
x
x
w
a
a
a
w>
3
3>
rx
o
0
0
o
aUC
W>
�U-+
w
A
ai
ai
ai
H
a
vi
3
v)
W
a)
Ln
V)
ul
LOara
A
a
a
W
w
HA
0
a
ri
o
M
1
>
V
O
sr
N
O
N
N
N
O
lw
N
r
w
OD
Cl
%0
01
w
01
r
0)
r
a%
N
0)
O1
0-4
O
�
H
A
Z
H
M
N
0)
O)
r♦
N
r-I
OD
OD
OD
00
O
00
O1
m
O
U
}'
H
z
ri
r�
O
M
(M
ON
ON
m
M
m
m
m
m
m
r♦
N
a
(�
.--4
0
M
Cl
O
w
V'
N
co
'-1
r-1
ri
ri
r-4
a
Po
w
cn
a
0
O
w
H
P4
r
r
r
N
O
r♦
r
Cl
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
O
O
(�
Co
co
00
ON
to
O
O
M
to
N
OD
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
OD
N
00
N
00
N
OD
N
00
N
00
LO
U-)
O
M
M
m
01
N
-4
f'M
M
Ln
ON
M
m
cM
M
Ln
O
in
O
O1
Cl
M
O
z
O
r
O
r
O
r
O
w
M
N
w
O
r
w
w
O
O
w
ea
w
qw
w
V•
w
V'
w
w
w
w
w
H
z
V
-tr
M
N
N
M
M
4m
M
V'
N
in
N
LO
M
M
m
N
«7
N
to
Ln
O
O
to
ul)
M
N
O1
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
%V
0
a
N
0)
sT
sr
w
r
w
0\
01
01
Ol
.-a
.-1
U
U
Ln
r-1
r-1
.-+
ri
r♦
w
1n
w
r 1
H
.�
ri
Cl
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
r♦
r 1
ri
r-�
c
r-I
r-I
C'
V'
a
V'
V'
V
v
e-i
r♦
c
r-I
0
0
U
U
a
z
z
z
z
z
z
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
a
a
a
a
�
M
U)
U)
E
a
W4
U
U
z
W
w
w
w
w
w
W
P4
Z
a
s
H
P4
A
A
>A
A
A
A
a)
vH)
o
4
4
4O
c
Lf)a
H
H
x
w
o
w
w
a
a
a
a
a
a
U
O
U
1
9c
E-H
E o
H
W
a
W
o
a
w
a
w
w
0
0
0
A
O
Q
M
a
[AA
s
W
H
H
o
0
o
A
888880
C7
C7
C7
C9
Ch
C7
a4
�4
CQ
W
W
W
0
z
O
z
o
V)
H
a
U
a
\\\\\\
RC
a
a
A
A
A
x
H
EH
O
a
w
x
H
W
a
x
w
a4
w
a
w
a
w
a
w
a
w
W
U
W
U
Q
a
w
w
w
0
w
�
w
o
cn
o
H
z
z
a
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
0
�H]
V1
z
H
z
G.
0
w
>
o
0
o
O
o
0
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
M
M
M
LO
o
o
M
o
ri
O
o
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
O
>+
0
O
0
O
r-4
ri
o
0
Cl
ra
-4
.-i
H
r 4
r4
r-1
V-1
U
H
E
E
F+
O
O
O
A
H
H
H
zzzzzz
H
H
H
H
H
Ha°aa°cz
�
a°c
a°c°x
H
H
x
a4xa4xxx
xx
14 �,
z
(N
to
r
OD
M
0)
O
V'
LO
'-1
N
M
qw
U-)
OD
N
r
r
r
N
r
00
N
NOD
OD
0D
co
ate++
O
H
z
M
0
rn
0
ON
N
x
U
ON
O
OD
OD
0)
OD
co
Ol
01
00
O
O
OD
OD
ri W
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
V-1
N
r-4
r-1
r-1
H
H
H
r-1
r4
ri
E+
r-4
H
H
H
pq
H
H
H
E4
H
H
H
H
H
E-1
a a
0
0
o
rn
o
0
o
H
w
LO
o
0
0
0
o
r
H
o
o
Oo
o
O
rn
OD
0D
o
Ln
o
0
o
rn
W
z
o
0i
ri
o
ao
rn
Oo
Co
;>
00
LO
N
N
M
r 1
v
M
Un
0)
M
N
1n
N
r1
rI
r-I
o
O
M
rI
ri
N
N
`M
W
U)
O
O1
O
O
O
1-4
ri
O
O
O
O
0
o
co
o
o
(n
r
U)
o
0
0
Sri
0i
ri
o
au
C ,
o
0
0
tD
to
N
N
M
H
V'
m
M
N
U)
M
r-i
r-1
U)
r-q
O
M
OD
h
z
A
H
>
H
H
to
a
1.4
s
a
a
a
a
a
z
z a
H
H
z
a RC
O H
Q
CO H
H
H �C
U H
a H
4
H
U
D
H
g
H 4
Er
H
U E+
H
U H
o
x
O
H O
E4 O
O
H O
E O
O
W
O
O
H O
O
H O
a
W
H
u) H
a H
04 E-E
4+ H
O H
E+
H
04
H
44 H
Gu
04 H
O
6+ H
W
w
U
H
A4
H
O
a
Gu
O z
U
a
uZ a
W
a
W
a
W
a 04
O
H
04
O a4
H w
O 04
E-H
H
O
a
H
U 1%
4 0
x a4
(A O
H
U O
O
(n O
W O
4
F:4
4 S
U
O
O
U O
H
04
to A
A
O A
04 0
04 A
H A
U
U
U [�
O
Q
a4 Q
0 A
a
a
z
U
z
W z
04 z
W z
W z
a z
to
v]
(n z
04
z
W z
a z
W z
a
W
H
O
E+ W
W W
H W
U w
a4 W
04 W
A
A
A w
E-H
W
U W
H W
U W
W
0>
Q 9
W 9
U D
a 9
a 9
z
z
z>
(n
9
U>
(n 9
U>
0
E-
FC
A
H
z
o
o
z
o
z
(A
Cl)
U)
H
U)
3
U)
a
a
H
U)
H
U)
M
H o
a
LO
00
o
M
O
I
O
0D
O
z
z
2:
O
U)
M
O
lD
O
H A
H
::)
U')
O
N
N
N
LO
LO
O
H
z
O
Lc)
r
O
OD
OD
co
H
Q
N
r
rI
N
h
r
r
H ,Y.
a
w
w
as a
o
0 w
H
p4
M
O
N
01
O
O
O
O
O
N
01
N
01
O
W
O
0)
0D
O
O
O
O
O
M
Co
OD
lD
ro
U)
O
Ln
U)
O
O
O
O
(D
U-)
Ui
►n
U')
M:
01
M
0)
Ol
r
r1
0)
m
M
01
m
Ol
01
U7
z
O
O
O
O
M
1D
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
10
r
1D
tD
tD
tD
1D
tD
h
tD
lD
tD
tD
tD
E+
z
m
N
m
C'
(M
c>•
C
C
M
(M
N
m
M
a
ON
LO
O
LO
o
LO
U-)
U-)
W)
W)
Ul
(D
Ln
U)
o
%D
N
N
N
r-1
N
d'
d'
W
N
N
N
N
r-4
U
U
.-f .
,..1
.-q
.-+
.-r
ri
r-1
11
r-1
11
H
r-1
r-1
.--1
o
o
a
O
o
O
o
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
ri
r-1
ri
r1
.--I
r-1
H
r-1
r-I
r-1
ri
ri
r-4
0
Cl)
O
a
.'7
H
H
a
U
a
a
a
rz
M
E-4
H0
9
U)
U
U
U
Ln
O
W
EE-4
a
0
()
w
E1
W
a
H
H
U
H
U
H
U
H
a
H
N
H
(n
H
z
a
4
Q
H
H
H
Q,
H
Q
a
pq
p4
U
a
U
U
U
x
U)
(n
z
W
Q
as
a
0
o
E
<
(n
U)
A
W
H
H
E
(n
a
A
0
a
a
a
a
qz
w
£
4
z
04w
E
E
D
a
a
cn
w
w
w
O
w
a
E
z
w
H
a
a14
a
E
cn
`-'
a
W
a
A
z
o
z
o
z
a
a
�
as
as
$
o
0
a
0
0
4
4
o
O
aaa
x
a
a
a
a
a
a
U
w
3
a
E
z 0
>
CD
O
O
Clo
o
O
O
Co
LO
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
►n
un
U)
o
o
o
0>4
r-4
r-1
rl
N
r-1
ri
O
O
O.
O
N
r 1
O
N
U E4
U H
HC
a
Cl)
0
a
H
a o
0 iZ
3
o
z
A
z
D
z
D
°
W
w
z
z
z
as
0
rC U
a4
a4
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
15
w
to
r
w
m
O
ri
N
m
C
w
w
r
O
m
O
H
N
M
qw
0
w
r
w
m O
N
w
O
O
O
m
C1
M
M
4M
M
M
M
M
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O ri
0
H
ri
ri
r♦
r-i
r-i
ri
ri
ri
r-i r♦
Ei
Z
M
O
C1
O O
\ r4
x
U
C\
OD
W
M
OD
W
CD
O
w
O
w
O
w
OD
w
w
w
w
0
OD
O
0
O
0 OD
N
ri
NNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNN
N
N
N
N
N
N N
w
�
1-1
r-1
H
ri
r-1
ri
ri
--1
r4
r-i
-4
H
-4
H
r 4
r1
r-I
ri
r-1
H
H
H
H
H
H r-1
E RC
ca
E
E
H
H
H
H
E-+
H
H
H
E
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
E
H
H
H H
a a
0
0
o
ao
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
E
p
Op
1p
t0
C
Cl
in
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 o
Wz
O
N
O
O
OD
C
ri
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
Ln
O
O
O
O
N O
.7
N
0
In
O
1n
r4
C1
V'
M
O
m
O
N
m
%D
O
Cl
C)
Ln
Cl
<T
r
r
OD
N C1
Q
d'
C
r
W
r 4
OD
r
M
fM
ri
cM
in
r-i
r
N
r-i
cor-i
1n
w
r i
a
r
O
ri
M
CA
o
rn
N
U N
N
rn
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a a
N
M
U
U
U
U
Q
U
U
Q
U
U
a
U
a
U
U
U
U
U
UUUU
r-1
fE!)
H
H
!
H
H
N
H
ri
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
C7
A
A
A
A
A
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x x
Iz-i
H
H
H
E
H
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U U
H
z
z
z
z
z
U
W
W
W
W
W
C*7
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
a
w
W
W
a
>
w a
H
\
E
\
H
"I
H
\
E
1-1
H
\
E
\
H
\
H
\
H
\
H
\
EH
1-1
\
H
\
E
"I\
H
H
\
E H
\ \
a
E'
E
E
H
H
H
E
E
H
H
H
E
H
H
H
H
H
H Z
Z
E-4
Z E
>>>>
H
W H
z
E
I
N
z
z
z
z
E
W
O
H
O
E
O O
U E
O
1)4
O
a
O
s
O
a
O O
a E
z O
O H
0
0
E
a
0
C7
C9
E
C7
E££
C9
C7
C9
U
O
O O
U
E
134
a
a
a
a
x
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E E
H
a
a
x a
E
E
z
E
E a
w a
0
H6
o
U Q
H
H
H
H
H
O
H
Ei
E
E
EH
E
H
H
H
H
EEi
E
E
E
H
E
E-1 H
C
A
A
w A
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U U
W
H W
h
1-3
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
W
r7
h
fD
W
r7 h
H
w
W
W
>
W
>
U
U
FC
U
U>
W>
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
A
a
O
O
O
o
Q
o
a4
a
s
04
a
a
w
a
a
a
cx
a
a
a
a
a
a
a o4
w
a
a
a
a
a
E
w
as
a+
w
134
a,
w
w
131
w
w
a,
134
w
w
w
w
w as
DW
U W
N
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ \
H A
a
r
O.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
cn
m
M
fM
M
m
fM
rn
M
M
M M
p
in
H
H
H
r i
r-i
r-i
r-1
r-i
r-i
H
r-i
ri
r-1
r-i
r♦
-4
H
r-i r-i
> 1
>
q
r-i
OD
OD
OD
OD
OD
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
I I
m
r-t
r
r
[�
[�
r
to
M
m
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
O
M
O O
H A
H
:D
E
r
r
r
r
r
w
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
Z
01
01
C1
m
m
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
q
a
N
N
N
N
N
C1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
H 14
a
as
w
as a
o
o w
H
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N
N
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
O O
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
M
M
M
O
M
O
O
O
O
O O
(n
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
o
0
0
0
0
0
1n
O
1n
1n
1n
O
Ln
0
0
0
0
0 0
Wt!
1
r
r
r
r
r
Ln
M
1n
1n
1n
f")
u-)
1n
un
1n
1n
Ln
Ln
1n
1n
ur)
1n
u)
M 1n
•z,
M
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
1p
N
N
N
N
N
t0
r
1p
t0
�O
�O
t0
lG
l0
l0
�O
�D
to
\O
t0
tp
l0
t0 t0
H
'z,
M
0
0
0
0
0
M
N
N
N
d'
w
w
r
M
m
w
Ln
m
cr
C
N
N
N
w w
D
N
O
O
o
0
0
in
o
in
O
H
Ln
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
m
N
1n
O
Ln N
Q
r
o
0
0
0
o
r-+
c
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
tD
rIKV
r
ICT r
V.-1
O
1n
O
1n
O
ri
,-�
1-4
1-4
ri
-4
r4
14
11
-4r--I
r-1
r-i
.-�
r-1
r-i
.--1
ri
.--I ri
Q'
O
N
N
M
M
v
O
0
O
Cl
o
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
Cl
o
O
0
O
O
O O
C'
r
r
r
r
r
r-i
r-i-,
ri
V'
am
r♦
V'
C'
d'
cp
sT
cM
a
C'
C'
V'
r-i
V'
ri C
U
U
U
U
U
H
H
p
iZi
H
H
w
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U U
w
z
z
z
z
z
z
Z
z
z
z
Z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
>
>
>
>
>
o
w
w
w
w
w
E
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UUUUU
U
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
m
w
w
w
w
w
w
0
w
w
w
w
w
w
w.w
w
w w
04
a
H
to
w
w
Q
w
w
w
w
FC
w
Cl)
w
Q
(n
v)
a
V)
a
Cl)ll)
RC
w
RC
w
FC
cn w
Q FC
.
o
w
Q',
H
H
H
Q
H
H
0
FC
FC
1
H
U
U
U
U
U
W
Ki
W
W
W
W
W
0
W
La%a
W
W
W
La
W
W
0 W
'A
a
O
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
o
z
z
z
z
z
U
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
H
E
H
H
H
H
H
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w w
w
w
w
w
w
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
04
a
a
a
04 a
w
W
w
w
w
m
w
Y4
w
�4
w
b4
w
�4
w
a4
w
x
w
m W
a
H
H
H
H
H
E
b4
x
x
U
U
U
U
U U
o
U
z
'a
z
z
'0
z
"�
z
0
x
W
U
H
U
H
U
H
U
1-4
U
H
U
H
U
H
U
H
U
H
U
H
U
H
U
H
U
H
H
H
H
H
H H
w
z
w
E
E
E
E
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
z 0
14
>
1n
O
O
O
O
O
O
r-1
-4
r-1
ri
-4
H
r 4
r i
r 4
r-i
-4r
4
-4
r-1
-4
r-i
1-1
ri -4
C>
r
ri
1-4
r-1
ra
-4
1-1
Co
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O >i
,-i
O
O
O
0
o
O
r-1
ri
r 4
ri
r1
rq
r-i
r-1
ri
r-i
ri
ri
r-1
r-i
r-i
r-i
r-i
r-i r i
U E
a
z
z
z
z
z
x
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U U
0
'n'
".,D
n
W
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
U
E
E
E
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z z
�r
16
r1
N
M
V
to
l0
r
OD
r
C'
O
m
O
r-1
u')
N
(+)
V'
CV)
to
CM
%D
m
r 1
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
(N
N
N
N
M
M
N
M
M
2
H
r-1
r-I
r-I
r-1
r1
ri
H
H
m
O
01
o
NU
�
W.
00
OD
OD
OD
O
O
O
OD
01
�T
C11
01
O1
01
V'
01
04CY%
N
m
N
ON
N
r-i
�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ri
N
r-1
N
H
NH
H
CN
H
N
H
H
H
H
E
4
pq
ri
E-1
rl
E
r1
H
rl
H
rf
E
r-i
H
e-i
H
r1
H
r-IH
H
E-1
e-4
E-E
E
EF
H
E
E
E
H
E
E
a
a
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
N
r
C
N
O
O
O
O
%0
LO
rl
E-H
O
to
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
to
O
W
V'
r-1
O
O
O
to
N
to
r
to
1n
0
to
O
O
O
01
00
r
r
O
O)
O
N
O
M
,z
O
O
N
m
M
to
VW
r4
N
O
N
H
01
N
H
O
to
to
%D
l0
H
ep
V'
ri
r 1
V'
rim
M
V'
00
N
M
W
0�0
a
O
OD
O
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
OD
O
O
O
r.
01
O
10
O
O)
O
N
r�
a
a ri
o
M
LOD O
o
N
cri
�
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U 0
to
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H rl
>
r-I
N
W
W
E
W
W
U
W
W
W
U
W
W
EC
H Q
FC
a
cD
z
o a
z�
0
E
H
H
E
H
H
E
E
H a
H�
O
0 0
O
O
H
H O
W
H
C9
C9
C7
C9
C9
C7
C9
E O
C7 H
H O
44 H
H
U H
O H
E
99
E
U
E+
E
E
E
E
z
E
E
E
a
k+
OW
w
w
w
w
w%
x a
E a
W a
A
A 04
V)
H
OH
a
H
H
E-t
H
H
H
H
E 1 0
O
W
w
w
w
w 0
U O
U Q
8
940
O
W
U
U
U
U
Uw
Uw
U
U A
P: Q
H
H
H
H
H A
z A
J
H A
P�
W A
H
z
U
w
�i
w
f7�D
hw
L))w
aaaaaw
w
Hw
aw
HHw
a
H
Cl)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0>
U>
a
D
a
a
a
D
a
O
a>
O
>
PS
U) >
z
a>
O
cn
cn >
a
A
U)
A
P:
a
C 4
a
a
a
0G
a
a
a
14
a
W
a
94
a
O
U)
w
w
cn
w
H
U)
H
Q
a4
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
l0
O
O
O
C
0
A
Q
W
r-I
rl
ri
rl
r-I
rl
rl
r-I
rf
ko
N
v
N
v
N
v
O
O
OD
>
z
W
I
M
I
M
1
M
1
M
I
M
1
M
I
M
I
M
r
O
r1
V'
%0
t0
10
V'
l0
Olk
l0
LO
O
l0
rI
0
V'
M
F-1
A
H
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
V'
N
N
V'
N
V'
N
N
M
N
W
N
O
H
z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
01
(71
0)
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
.Y.
a
as
w
as
a
1
O
O
w
E
pl.
N
O
N
Cl
O
O
Cl
O
Cif
Co
N
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
W
cn
O
(n
0
0
0
0
0
OD
O
O
O
O
O
0
Olt
O
Co
O
O
O
(>a
Ln
O
to
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
O
w
O
O
O
O
tf )
O
O
O
to
to
to
Ln
to
N
1n
to
Ol
r-I
M
M
r-1
r-4
to
0)
M
Ol
01
M
'z,
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
to
W
W
%o
H
'z,
r
M
NM
sM
N
N
N
M
M
N
r-I
N
M
N
l0
N
N
N
'J
N
N
M
M
01
N
O
to
u')
Cl
U)
O
O
Co
N
O
u'1
to
ur
O
0
r
r
r
r
w.
r
r
a
N
V
r-1
r-1
ri
r1
r
N
V'
v
v
N
U
U
r-I
ri
r1
r-I
r-I
ri
rl
r-1
r-I
r-I
ri
r-I
r-I
ri
r-I
rl
ri
r1
ri
r-1
r>;
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Co
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
o
0
0
cp
V
V'
C
r-1
r-1
r-I
rl
1-1
r1
1-1
V'
7-1
r-I
ri
r-4
r-i
O
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
U
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
U
U
U
U
W
,n
O
O
O
O
w
O
fn
z
z
z
z
z
Q
(1t
V:
O
N
(n
Cli
fn
Cn
fn
H
H
H
H
H
a
RC
Q
a
FC
Q
FC
FC
W
H
H
z
w
H
aaaaa
E
H
o
W
W
E+
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
A
A
A
U
O
1z-1
c0»
a
«0
cW4
vOi
P:
P4
cOn
pG
vOi
oG
a♦
N
P:
O
EAw
A
Q
w
w
w
w
P:
H
a
a
O
O
a
D
Q1
x
x
W
x
H
H
E
a
W
w
a
Wx
o
U
x
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
H
H
w
H
W
H
44
W
44
44
w
W
a
w
O
3
O
0
U)
0
U)
U)
Q
z
H
z
H
z
H
z
H
z
H
z
H
z
H
z
H
z
W
0
W
0
0
0
0
rC
a
z
a
a
s
(�
"Ef�'
0
>
r-1
r1
.-i
rI
ri
rI
rl
r1
O
ui
u)
to
to
to
o
O
O
O
O
►,�
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
to
0
0
to
O
N
ra
r 4
H
r-I
r-I
r)
ri
H
r-1
O
O
O
O
O
qa
H
M
3
rI
O
H
O
0
U
H
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
z
44
Ga
44
G+
W
1.4
EH
O
()
N
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
'J
k+
W
Eu
44
44
0
4
a
H
a
a
a
s
U
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
o
0
0
0
17 ��
r
oD
01
O
r-4
N
C
o
%D
r
m
m
o
H
N
CM
M
r
oD 01
un
Lo
Ln
Ln
C
N
N
N
E+
z
M
O
01
O
N
U
01
Ol
01
Ol
Ol
Ql
Ol
Ol
dl
Ol
al
Ol
dl
Ol
Ol
Oh
Ql
V'
V'
C
N
H
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ri
14
r-1
ri
H
H
+ H
H
ri
H
H
ri
r-I
ri
r-I
ri
Er
ri
H
-4
E4
ri
E+
ri
H
14
Gq
H
H
Er
H
H
H
(-i
E
E-4
H
H
H
E•r
H
E+
a
a
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
ul
0
0
0
0
lD
O
O
r-1
O
O
M
O
N
[-�
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
un
N
w
O
M
0
N
H
ko
LO
01
w
z
O
r
O
C
O
O
O
N
M
C l
CD
C
�+
rJ
W
0
M
w
M
DD
r
M
Ol
\D
m
O
O
N
N
H
OD
O
%D
N
LO
r
�+
O
r-1
N
N
N
%D
CO
O
r
N
Im
N
5+
H
N
al
OD
M
C
O
w
w
C�
M
N
a
s
dl
Ui
M
-4
r 1
Lc)
O
O
O
r-I
N
O
O
LO
C1
O
O
O
O
V
M
O
14
O
N
N
M
H
�D
N
cn
H
rn
M
O
O
ri
M
H
H
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U M
H
H
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
fn
fn
In
f!]
f/�
in
fn
O
O
z
H
H
O
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z a
a
a
H
H
s
H !�
>
>
>
> 4
H
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w 4
RC
�
a
z
E-4
U H
cn
fA
N
C>7 H
rC H
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
H
to H
H
0
O
O
E-E
H O
44 H
X
a4
O
X E•
H O
H H
W
U
W
U
W
U
w
U
W
U
W
U
W
U
w
U
w O
U H
W O
W EH
H
W
U
H
E.,
G4
.`G
U
U
U
U
U
rx
1%
P4
P4
Q4
P4
C4
w
P4
44
OG
H
a
a
o oa
WWWWW
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 a4
a
a) a
w
w
w
OH
O
0
x
x
x
x 0
08
44
44
w
f .r
W
w
w
L.r
w O
0
08
z
WO
H A
ZZZ
w
w
w
>
aG
0
x a
U
U
U
U a
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
F+ z
a z
z
U
z
W z
z
H ,rZ
W
W
W
W
w
W
w
W
W z
H
14>
N
N
N
N>
>
>
>
CDOO
0>
cn
a
w
a
w
a>
a
a
a
a
BOA
vai
44
M
LO
0
A
w
CD
�D
tD
�D
�D
�D
tD
�D
�D
�D
�
M
Ln
�r
�D
r-I
I
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V'
OD
al
r"I
N
z
z
N
M
C
w
V'
C
v
d'
v
V'
C
d'
-V
V'
r
r
un
CD
Lo
CD
Ln
H
Q
H
.r>
M
M
M
M
H
ri
r-4
H
H
•-4
ri
H'
r-4
ri
r i
O
O
O
O
H
z
Ol
Cl
m
m
U
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
O
H
cr
a
q
N
N
N
N
0
W
!n
W
to
(n
to
N
fn
U)
V]
H
,Y•
a
ao
w
°i
0
0
w
H
a
rn
r
r
r
r
o
ON
ao
o
N
rn
oo
r
Ln
H
m
o
M
M
o
W
OD
o
Ln
Lo
to
O
N
r
r
w
w
w
%D
0
r
r
O
(NI
N
O
to
M
LO
Lo
0
O
un
Lo
Ul
o
to
Ln
Ln
un
Ln
Ln
O
Ln
Lo
O
O
01
01
01
01
C1
01
Ol
Ol
Ol
Ol
01
Ol
01
Ol
O1
al
H
ri
r-I
H
z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
lD
l0
tD
t0
�D
tD
�D
�D
lD
�D
lD
lD
w
w
w
w
r
tD
tD
E-4
M
N
N
N
(N
.-i
e-I
ri
ri
ri
r-I
ri
ri
ri
1-4
H
r-I
r•i
ri
ri
•J-
�n
to
to .
t1')
t!')
u'>
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Co
O
0
0
0
U
N
a'
M
M
M
m
M
m
m
M
m
M
M
ri
ri
r-1
r-1
U
U
ri
ri
H
e-1
ri
H
r-i
r-I
ri
r-�
ri
r•1
H
H
H
ri
ri
r-I
H
ri
04
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
r-I
H
r 1
H
r 1
r 1
ri
H
•-i
r-I
H
r i
ri
H
r-I
1-1
ri
ri
r-1
r-i
U)
to
f/)
En
W
U
a
w
w
w
w
r4
w
w
w
w
w
z
0
Ga
G4
Ga
44
Lsr
44
fs+
G4
44
w
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Z
x
a
94
P1
a
ac
a
s
o4
a
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
U
O
W
W
W
W
>+
>4
>i
>+
>+
>+
>+
>H
>H
>H
>+
a+
,n
cn
a
s
a
s
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
E-1
a
a
o
w
w
w
w
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
0
z
>4
a
a
a
z
z
z
z
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z
w
H
O
1%
a4
04
x
W
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
W
W
H
H
H
z
��
w
w
w
w
In
H
0
H
a
H
H
0
H
a0
H
H
ca
H
0
H
0
H
ca
H
ca
H'
W
W
W
H
U)
Vi
W
(n
Vi
fn
W
cn
U)
f!)
fn
Q1
a
a
C4
lzWxaaa4a
x
a
w
z
4
x
a
a
a
w
>
w
>
W
>
w
>
W
>
w
>
w
>
w
>
W
>
w
>
w
>
>
H
H
H
p,
00
to
cn
to
Q;
cn
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
•J
O
�
z
�
z
0
>
Ln
O
o
0
a
ri
o
a
a
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C:)
r
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
CD
O
O
CD
O
1-4M
�n
O
Ln
O
�o
O
H
O
O
O
O
O
ri
ri
ri
r-I
H
H
r-I
r-1
ri
r-I
r-I
U
H
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
z
a
a
a
a
Q
U
18 `-
61
r-1
O
w [r+
U W
0 A
> I
H A
H
A
H x
a
r�
w
ou a
1 0
o w
H
O e-1 N M V' t0 h 00 O1 O H N m v to w h 0 m O ri
M fY) M M M M M M M M C C V' V' V' 1w C' C' d' Vr to to
H oz
x
H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
ry' r-1 r♦ ri '-1 ri ri ri '-t �-1 .-i r-1 e-i H .--I '-i ri ri ri ri .-i ri ri
CO E-1 E-t Et H E-t H H E-1 E+ E-t E+ H H H H H H H HH H H
N O O N 01 N 01 O O1 00 V' tD O M tD h 01 V' M M O 01
W z h Ol O cl; ri M r♦ tM 01 N ri Ol N 0 h h tD 0 01 O1 a;
t:) 0) ri in OD 0% O 0) ON h O N H ri to N O M .-i V' O e-1 V
0 ri W) VA to ri sr M M NOD fM CV m 01 01 O
M ri ri V OD ri H M to
a '-I
0
h
z �
H N
z U')
a w to
H
(z.1 H H 3 OD
a azz00o x a a
z x a x a x h o x w w w w w o )ixx wHa to w > H x x o
M D D A A z z H H U U cn o
W H U z z z z z x o 0 0 0 z w a z z x H
U F1 H H H H H 14 U) x x E E 3 O W aa W
H 04 FC W rC FC FC Q W W rC V) W a A a w 1%
O H 01 z H E+ H H E-t z Ou a A A 44 QA
> p4 w w w w w w w w H H o 0 0 o z W o rG x a w
z U U c7 Dz a a x x o U z z E a a D a U U U cn cn h z
H fn W
w a a a a a a a a a a 3 3 a a a a a a a a a a>
A a a a a a a a a a a oa oa a a a a a a a a a a
a
W h M N N N N N N to 0 ri .-� M �r 1n M t0 N d1 01 01 N
� W O .--I O O O O O ri O O O O O O Ol 01 Ol 01 Ol O ra N
OD OD 0 00 0 OD OO OD OD 00 OD 0 0 CD h [� h h h aD 0 0
H 0 to to an to to 0 to to to to 1n to an to to to to to to to to
z o 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D
d' N M d' to t0
to to to Ln to to
0)
lw
w
qr
ON
N
N
N
N
N
ri
ri
ri
H
ri
H
H
H
Et
H
Cl
O
o
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
to
to
w
N
r♦
M
O
to
ri
ri
ri
0
0
0
0
0
0
p.
O
O
N
C
N
r♦
Ol
ri
N
w H
0 0
U W
0 >
U)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
M
O
O
O 01
W O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O 0
I>a O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
1n
O
O
O
to
O
O
Co to
ri
r♦
r 1
ri
r♦
r 1
r 1
ri
ri
M
r♦
r 1
ri
ri
ri
H
H
ri
H
to
in
C' M
.'�j
z O
O
O
O
O
O
Co
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
tD
l0
tD
tD
t0
to
to
tD
tD
t0
%0
w
t0
tD
t0
tD
t0
t0
to
t0
tD
01 to
H
rl
H
ri
N
to
M
tD
1n
N
1n
M
t0
t0
tD
M
ri
H
ri
H
m
M
O (M
m O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
H to
O r♦
ri
r♦
01
O1
O1
O1
m
aN
01
01
Ol
O1
C1
01
H
H
r-I
H
h
h
h N
Vri
ri
ri
N
tD
to
tD
tD
Ln
t0
to
tD
tD
t0
to
ri
ri
H
H
H
H
H ri
Q,' O
O
O
O
O
d'
d'
O
O
O
wr
V'
C'
d'
d'
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
ri
.-1
H
lw
d'
N
N
V'
IV
Vr
N
N
N
N
N
H
ri
H
ri
C
C'
v H
a a a a W aW a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a x a
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
E-t H H E-t H E-t H H H H H H H H H H E4 H H E+ H H
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
D QD a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0 to to to to 0 to to 0 to to to 0 to to to to to to to to N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
E+ E-t E-4 H H H H E+ H H H H E+ H E-t H H H H H H H
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
a a a a a a a ac x a a ac x a oc 04 a a a 04 x a
a a a
d'
N d' M
to 1n to
M M M
-4 ri r♦
1 1 1
M M M
O O O
h h h
aw Rr a
to N Ln
to to to
O O O
t0 tD t0
mr aW IV
Ln to to
M M M
rA ri ri
O O O
ri H H
w W W
U U U
H H H
> > >
a Pc a
W w w
En w w
0 LD a
z z z
H H H
a a a
z z z
z z z
W W w
Q
m m to
O o 0
O O O
r-1 e-i ri
W w 0
Q
H
0 H
� A
(n >
z
H
N
0)
to
M
O
tD
N
O
N
r-I
O
r♦
ON
N
ri
H
N
M
0
r♦
1n
ri
0
M
O
h
M
tf)
M
ri
O
.-4
A
H
Q
H
U)
a
H
w
H
U
w
a
W
U)
r OD rn o ff M N In u7 w r m w r w m o
ul) U*) u-) tD tD to u-) un un uh %D w %0 �-o r
O
H z
M
0
rn
O -
H
NU
x
m
ON
0)
N
01
N
0)
N
0)
N
0)
N
Ol
N
v'
N
01
N
N
v'
N
v'
N
M
N
M
N
01
N
01
N
M
N
H
W
04
Q,
N
.-4
H
N
rl
E
r(
E
r1
E
'-1
H
r-I
H
r1
E
1-1
E
r(
E
ri
H
r1
E-
ri
E+
1-4
E-4
r(
E4
rl
H
'-1
H
r q
E
rl
H
a
a
O
0
E4
O
u)
O
U
O
tO
N
in
l0
O
O
u)
O
O
r1
t0
O
M
r
C
M
O
aD
O
lD
V'
lO
aD
'1
%0
OD
l0
v
M
-4
N
H
W
z
N
r
r
M
N
In
ao
lO
r
cp
M
aT
H
r
M
M
M.
C
H
O
H
OD
H
r
M
N
N
lO
r
r1
2:
}4
D
O
O
lD
N
O
LO
N
M
N
r1
'-/
N
M
m
(M
H
N
1
a
.
N
M
O
d
O
OD
ul
O
LO
O
o
rl
w
r
r
-Co
H
o
M
r
Ln
Lr
u)
L�
H
ao
lO
r
W
�r
H
t0
N
H
N
M
0)
V'
M
r
z
O
H
H
A
z
z a
a
a
a
a
s
H
z
H
Ea-1
EQ+
EA
U) H
z o
ElE--1
E O
a
H o
H
a
a
a. 0
W
O
H
o
E
O
H
O
C4 E
O
H
H E•
Hz
E-1
a
s E'
H
w
aG
w
w a
E°• 1%
CO
U)C 4
Q a
H
G4
H A4
g
v Q
a$
H
H 8
g
�
g
A o
A
w
a
W
s
w
H
w
H
W
H
w
H
W
H
w
H
w
H
w
H
>
a
U
z
L)
U)z
cn z
0z z
a
A z
z
x z
w z
U
U z
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
H
ul
W
w
>
A
Q w
>
H w
cn >
a1
a
04 w
a>
w
O>
CO w
>>
a W
H
x
H W
x>
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Q
z
D
D
H
U
W
>>
W
O
0
D
w
D
fly
D
m
D
w
D
w
D
0
D
0
•n
W
44
ul
Ol
N
N
OD
O
(D
N
N
H
A
a'
rl
p
(")
r/
0)
N
OD
(O
w
m
m
N
O
N
CD
N
O
(n
01
ON
m
1
>
on
Op
Op
l0
H
N
OD
OD
m
(V
to
-W
l0
O
M
O
-W
H
-W
.- 4
a
rl
a
O
-W
O
a
H
Q
H
H
z
N
r
N
r
r
C1
(0
(7
-WI
d
rl
(N
lO
r
d'
r
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
q
HY.
r
r
r(
r1
1-1
rl
a
w
cn
a
1
O
o
w
E
p(,
W
O
O
M
LO
N
M
O
Cl
O
O
M
LO
O
Cl
O
O
O
u7
O
LO
O
O
ri
H
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(Y,
u7
Lo
LO
O
O
to
O
O
lO
l0
O
OD
OD
O
O
O
O
O
D
d
01
O
01
O
M
O
M
O
O1
O
0)
O
to
M
01
H
r-4
O
aM
O
M
O
O
O
'-(
O
r(
O
H
O
z
r1
V0
OD
ao
%D
ko
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
H
z
M
10
N
-W
N
M
Ln
r1
O
N
O
M
r
V'
to
V--1
O
1-4H
O
O
H
to
N
O
M
LO
l0
to
H
U) u�
V)
to
r1
LO
O
r
r
N
N
N
lD
v'
to
u1
LO
-W
u)
r(
c
r1
M
M
v
U
U
r-1
O
rl
O
e-1
O
O
O
Co
O
rl
O
rl
O
rl
O
rl
O
N
O
rl
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
v'
.-4
H
H
C
rl
u7
u7
u)
H
LO
r1
r-(
H
rl
r(
H
H
H
HHj
H
U
HH
U
CU-1
EU-1
EE-4
EU-1
O
L)
L)
H
A
A
Q
A
A
A
Q
A
M
`:i
o
W
W
W
H
H
x
U
U
(n
(n
U)
to
V]
(!)
U!
to
a4
a
tV
s
L)
W
1a.(
O
E
O
W
H
W
Hz
W
W
z
W
z
W
z
W
z
W
z
W
z
W
z
Q
Q
z
E
a
o
O
o
o
a
H
w
H
w
H
A
w
H
D
H
D
D
m
D
as
D
m
O
m
D
m
O
W
D
oa
D
o0
94 1.4
EA
Cl)
w
w
w
cn
a
a
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
m
z
O
H
E
3
x
W
W
v]
cA
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
}I
°'
p
H
E
H
o
z
a
z
H
a
H
a
H
a
H
a
H
a
H
a
H
a
H
a
HH
$
H
o
Fl
(n
(n
M
(n
cn
z
(n
(n
cn
(n
Cl)
cn
U)
cn
(n
(n
(n
cn
(n
(n
E"
p
>
Lr)
LO
o
0
0
OD
rn
O
u7
LO
rn
rn
rn
ON
rn
v'
rn
C
rn
W
m
v
OU
r
0
r
o
O
H
r-I
d
H
o
O
O
O
o
r
O
IV
O
v
d
%V
0
4
v
0
4
V'
0
4
a
0
4
0
9
0
4
0
Q
0
4 4.
EE-1
W
H
W
H
O
a
D
O
D
O
W
a
4
H
4
H
E-I
E
H
E-H
E
E
H
H
U
F('i
H
U
fn
(n
(n
(/1
fn
(n
CA
f!)
(/�
f!)
fl)
(n
(n
W
�
�
f!)
W
20
H
N
m
v
N
tD
h
OD
01
.--I
01
O
O
N
M
In
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
OD
U)
co
tG
OD
OD
OD
H
z
M
O
01
o to
\ .-,
N
x
U
0)
01
0)
m
0)
Im
01
0)
0)
0)
d'
M
0)
01
H W
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
'-•I
H
r-4
H
H
H
H
a s
E-E
F
F
E-H
F
H
E-+
F
F
H
H
F
H
F
F
H
0
0
H
sr
lG
tD
Ol
01
tD
to
O
H
co
O
O
O
O
M
H
E-H
ON
h
LO
h
rn
h
0,
o
M
O
o
O
U)
o
�r
z
F
w
z
OD
N
M
N
C1
l0
M
lG
C
OD
OD
t0
O
O
C
M
0
qw
-W
O
OD
1
OD
H
Ln
W
V'
H
N
N
OD
M
h
h
a
�
M
OD
to
U)
O
H
OD
o
O
O
0
t0
01
o
M
o
o
O
U)
O
ao
M
tO
C
aD
OD
t0
O
O
V
t0
N
Ul
O
U7
M
O
U)
H
N
O
co
H
U•)
t0
C
H
N
H
OD
CV)
h
M
E-H
>+
z
W
W
�
a
>
s
a
a s
a
a
0 a
a
a
a
rC
a
cn
Z.
H
F
F
H
h H
H
F
H
<
H
F
O
O
01 O
O
O
O
H
O
z
0
z
0
F
O
0
t9
F
r~
H
F
F
F
F
F
ri)\
F
f
w
U
E
\
O
W
w
o
H
a
cn
to
ri)
ri)
co
W
0r
U a
W
a
EE
a
2 a
E
04
A
L4
a
04
U)
04
F QG
O
H
W
W
W
W
W
W
o
> g
W
o
U
O
cn O
W
O
FC
O
U
O
W
O
U g
U
z
H
U
cn
H
A
as
H
a
a
H
a
a
H
A
a
H
a
a
H
a
a
A
z
w
V)
z
F W
H
a
as
A
z
w
a
x
F
A
z
W
\ A
a z
rC w
U
4
A
A
z
w
cn
w
A
z
w
to
0
A
z
W
H
A
a
A
z
w
O
z z
H W
H
w
w
a
a
a
a
a
a>
z>
a>
U)>
c� >
a>
A>
0>
a>
U)>
44
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
z
w
w
a
a
z
cn
w
w
cn
tn.
w
U)
U
cn
H
a
04
z
A
W
H
EH
w w
U W
t0
to
to
tD
O
to
H
H A
a'
N
N
O
N
N
N
o
M
Ol
to
U)
0
W
m
m
N
m
t0
m
u1
O
N
h
h
Ln
> 1
>
Cil
01
m
O
m
h
m
H
a%
O
M
H
H
0
z
z
m
0
0
H
O
M
O
N
H
Vw
OD
O
H
H A
H
D
V
C
d'
V'
OD
V
O
lM
M
H
O
H
H
H
z
O
O
O
O
W
O
H
IV
h
M
M
H
A
M
M
M
M
U)
M
H
M
OD
H
O
h
h
H ,94
a
oa
w
as a
1 0
o w
H
pC,
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
N
O
M
O
O
N
N
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
01
O
U)
O
O
O
0)
0
(�
O
O
o
0
00
O
O
LO
O
U)
O
O
OD
U)
O
H
M
H
H
H
H
U)
H
0)
H
(A
M
M
01
U)
z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
tp
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
t0
%D
tD
t0
h
t0
t0
H
H
t0
U)
H
U)
H
U)
H
U•)
H
U)
N
O
M
U)
M
LO
H
O
01
h
N
N
V'
O
M
U)
N
O
N
U)
O
V'
d'
H
N
N
N
h
N
N
H
t0
qw
H
H
N
a'
UH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
H
H
H
H
H
C
H
H
H
V'
H
H
H
H
H
Ez01
EO+
�C
zFz
a
zF
RC
zF
z
O
U
O
z
O
Cw)
H
U
>
>
>
>
>
>
U
A
r>r
U
E"
z
A
A
A
A
A
A
z
>H
a
ao
G+
H
M
rC
r�
Q
rC
rC
H
H
W
x
O•
O
to
v)
w
w
w
a
W
w
N
E
C7
C44
In
0
0
cn
cn
cn
cn
0
>
w
F
z
a
(4
a
w
w
w
W
w
w
O
0
a
w
>+
H
w
z
w
Q
z
z
z
z
z
z
c4
z
0a
a
A
F
H
O
z
H
H
H
H
H
H
(7
A
A
RWWC,
z
a
U)
H
OU
04
F
a
O
z
E
z
w F
oa
m
m
ca
m
as
a
w
cn
H
0
w
a H
w
o
H
x
cn
cn
w
w
w
U)w
cn
co
a
a
a
a
a
a
cV)
x
w
a
In
L)
RC
o4
a
a4
a
a
a
a
a
�
w
v
\
w
z
(2+
a
o
A
4
E-H
4<
F
H
Q
F
49:4
H
H
3
�
a
H
O
a
O
a
3
0
E
W
a
o
Cl)
z
U
W
W
W
W
cn
44
cn
cn
to
E-H
E+
a
E-+
H' 44
W
z 0
>
01
01
Ol
01
01
01
M
Co
O
O
O
O
O
O
U)
l�
0
cW
W
IV
qw
O
O
H
O
U)
O
O
O
N
O
0 >4
Cl
0
0
0
Co
0
O
O
O
H
O
H
H
H
H
U E,
4
4
4$4
9
4
w
w
0
a
a
w
t9
E
o
C
U H
F
F
F
EH
E+
H
F
F
EA
D
O
3
FC
w
x
ry U
w
cn
In
cn
to
to
to
Cl)
w
to
to
EH
F
H
H
30
21
%D
.-1
N
1-
00
01
O
ri
CM
N
M
d'
co
00
00
00
01
O
H
z
M
0
ON
�
N
r°
x
U.
rn
c
v�
0)
o,
rn
rn
rn
a�
o,
rn
rn
'-i
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
f" 1
H
r-1
r-1
H
T-1
e--I
ri
T4
H
-4
H
H
F'
ra;
Oq
H
E-+
H
E-H
H
H
H
H
a
a
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
00
O
N
U-)
O
O
O
o
O
M
O
O
O
OD
z
W
H
o
�r
O
V;
aD
r
o
a
o
of
m
tp
lD
l�
I�
O
M
Cl
N
fM .
O
to
O
N
N
LO
LO
ri
T-1
M
a,
C
H
O
a
CY)
-4
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
0o
O
O
O
O
Ln
O
O
o
O
M
O
O
C
W O
O1
LO
M
O
fay u7
M
co
N
N
N
ri
z�
'�
rn 9-1
to
r-
H H
CDa
W
C")
M
a
0
a
U
U
C7
a
H
w
a
a
a
u a
A
ai
a) a
a
z a
z A
U)
1
+n
H Q
> a
w Fe
0 4
> a
t/1 H
a
z
E+
U H
to H
H
a
a H
U E-H
H
H H
U H
1 0
z H
H O
0
a
0
O
H O
0
w 0
0
0 0
0
k0 0
o1
w 0
H.
A H
E+ H
x H
E-F
w
H
H
Ca H
z EA
U E+
a
04 H
z H
H
P4
w
Q
"
vi o4
z
z a
H a
��-I a
H a
H a
0 a
W a
w -
IU-1
O
H
04
0
a
O
I%
H g
0
0
0 0
EA 0
O
z 0
A
x 0
H A
H 0
a A
x 0
U A
a
>
C4
A
C4 A
U
>+ A
U
U A
FC A
cn A
0
z
z
z
0
z
U
z
W z
w z
w z
z
z
w z
U z
W
a4 W
W
W
H
U)
W
U W
a W
> w
H
E W
>
a (4
a >
H W
a >
cn >
a >
w
A
A
>
U >
0
Cl) >
z
a >
a
Cl)
W
Cl)
w
0
w
x
0
Cl)
H
U)
a
a
a
W
A
CQ
H
a4
>
w
44
M
ri
Lf)
0%
O
>
Ol
d'
o
rn
o
z
l
z
ro
O
coO
O
O
r-1
to
O
to
Ol
N
N
a
H
A
H
::)
V'
N
1
I
1-4
lD
l-
O
O
N
W
H
z
co
%D
%D
M
N
O
O
M
A
p
r 1
M
1p
w
O
ri
H
.Y.
a
00
W
ca
a
0
0
w
H
a
01
M
O
O
�
O
W
O
O
O
M
(Y)
O
O
L
O
O
d'
O
O
Im
Ln
o
o
lD
W
Co
O
U')
O
O
Ln
9
01
Ln
01
M
0)
M
r
O)
Ln
r1
L
M
z
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
qw
O
O
%D
lD
to
w
w
to
tD
ko
lD
tD
10
l�
H
M
lD
ri
N
i-
N
r-1
O
M
M
d'
N
O
L
N
N
OLC)
tn.
u)
N
Ln
Ln
to
M
N
0
N
N
M
qw
00
1`
r-1
N
U
O
.-1
.-+
e-i
H
H
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
r1
O
O
O
O
ri
r-1
ri
V�
ri
r♦
r-I
M
V
r-1
ri
r-1
H
U
H
>4
�.
Q
v
H.
a
A
a
?
H
H
W
V]
(Yi
z
-
I
A
U
w
W
w
H
z
cn
O
U
C9
0
a
w
a
s
w
E
Z
z
Z
O
p
FC
D
Cal
FC
U)
.O
EAU
OI
a
O
"'
a
s
w
a4
a
w
S
In
En
�
>
A
cn
z
w
D
O
O
>
z
p
>
o
O
O
O
O
o
O
o
w
o
0
0
•�
N
ri
o
r-1
H
ri
N
In
r4
W)
O
t(1
O
N
O
O
ri
Co
O
O
o
ri
O
O
r1
S
a
lz
n4
w
a
z
In
Cl)m
U
H
FC
U
H
H
H
H
H
D
a
D
O
O
>
>
22 ♦:
0
to
c-
OD
-W
rn
o
0)
m
m
m
k0
0)
o
o
�o
O
H
z
M
0
rn
O r-
.-.
N
x
U
Ol
01
01
Ol
c'
01
01
01
V
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Q
E
pq
H
H
EH
E+
E-N
H
H
H
H
a a
Q
0
lw
Un
o
o
o
w
ri
�
OD
OD
o
ODH
r
Z
(4
H
z
ri
'-1
a
r t
o
O
OD
7�
D
O
r i
N
1
r
r-
M
w
V'
H
N
Qr
N
N
C
O
to
o
O r4
OD
OD
O
OD
ri
to
r- ri
to
Ol
O
o
N
O
c�
m
O
O
-4
C
,
OD
N
r
Ol
M
cM
to H
-4
H
N H
H
w
w
z
E
z
H
z
E-E
H
0z
E+
H
H
H
W
E-4 a
O
O
H
O
O
H
O
Q
O
O
cn
0
W
H
H
H
H
w
H
4
H
H
H
a
H
fC
E4
w
w
"'
Hw
aa
H
w
ED
a
cc
%
x
a
sSL�
o
ff
O
o
Q
ao
8
a
$>
zU
04
a
z
a
a
a
A
z
z
W
A
z
H
z
a
z
w
z
H
cn
w
a
w
a
w
w
W
z
w
44
W
H
w
H
w
>
z>
o>
a
a>
7z
2>
a>
U
A
H
H A
p:
�M
P4
>
CA
On
OD
e-4,
OD
H
OD
N
O
N
OD
d'
OD
r'I
W
W
A
H
H
O
O
O
w
N
Ln
01
c
Q
O
to
N
O
H
a
x
w
as a
o
O w
H
n4
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
N
�
W
o
0
0
0
O
to
O
rn
o
m
O
o
O
o
U)
to
o
Ln
�o
C)
M
r-c
ri
ri
M
to
0)
d\
z
O
o
O
w
O
M
o
O
O
EE+
z
r-4
N
N
c+n
r 1
M
O
N
M
p
to
O
o
to
O
Ln
N
O
cn
O
r 1
N
N
N
M
r-c
N
r
U
U
ri
ri
ri
r-c
r♦
ri
r♦
r♦
'-c
r1;
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
ri
r-c
r-I
ri
ri
-4
V'
ri
ri
O
H H
H H
O
H
H
H
a
O
9
W E
U U
OU U
o
N
to
3
U
H
G4
O
a
�0 z
H H
H H
co
H
U)
a
fx
3
H
O
x
w� $
to z
��
3 3
`a a
3 3
w
3
H
3
a
3
A
H Gu W
z 0 >
a
O >4
U H
U H
O O
r-4
0 0
A a
4
o o
r4 ri
0 o
a A
4
O
Ln
ri
o0
W
O
o
rI
a
H
O
0
.1
U
a
o
0
.-i
O
O
O
o
a
w
Q U
3 3
3 3
3
3
3
3
X
23
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE - AP5005
CHECK
REGISTER 2:OOPM 12/04/03
CITY OF
LA QUINTA
BANK
ID: DEF
PAGE 1
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
PAYMENT
NUMBER
DATE
NO.
NAME
AMOUNT
***NO CHECKS
WERE USED
FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.***
56459
12/04/03
&02149
NANCY ALEXANDER
20.00
56460
12/04/03
ABE001
JACQUES ABELS
100.00
56461
12/04/03
AD0010
DON ADOLPH
100.00
56462
12/04/03
ATT075
AT&T WIRELESS
101.78
56463
12/04/03
BOB100
BILL BOBBITT.
75.00
56464
12/04/03
BOD010
MARK A BODNAR
83.78
56465
12/04/03
BUT100
GREG BUTLER
83.78
56466
12/04/03
CAL040
CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE
1088.83
56467
12/04/03
CAL080
CA SOC MUNCIPAL FINANCE
35.00
56468
12/04/03
CAL167
CALPERS LONG-TERM CARE
85.39
56469
12/04/03
CAN050
CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO
611.88
56470
12/04/03
CAS100
MARIA CASILLAS
83.78
56471
12/04/03
CHI005
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
1260.00
56472
12/04/03
CHRO10
SHARON CHRISTIANSEN
83.78
56473
12/04/03
COA030
COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANC
2967.00
56474
12/04/03
COA080
COACHELLA VALLEY WATER
13772.43
56475
12/04/03
CRA050
DANIEL CRAWFORD JR
83.78
56476
12/04/03
CUN100
DENNIS CUNNINGHAM
75.00
56477
12/04/03
DAN125
RICHARD A DANIELS
100.00
56478
12/04/03
DOM025
ANNA DOMINGUEZ
8.66
56479
12/04/03
FER150
HECTOR J FERNANDEZ
- 8.66
56480
12/04/03
FRA010
MARNI FRANCISCO
48.10
56481
12/04/03
GEN100
THOMAS P GENOVESE
93.24
56482
12/04/03
GUZO10
HECTOR GUZMAN
8.66
56483
12/04/03
HAR030
TOM HARTUNG
93.24
56484
12/04/03
HER010
JERRY HERMAN
93.24
56485
12/04/03
HOR100
DODIE HORVITZ
18.10
56486
12/04/03
IMP010
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST
19404.12
56487
12/04/03
JON130
MARCIA JONASSON
516.00
56488
12/04/03
KIR010
TOM KIRK
100.00
56489
12/04/03
KOC100
STEVE M KOCHELL
83.78
56490
12/04/03
LAQ050
LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES
595.79
56491
12/04/03
LAQ230
LA QUINTA H S TOUGH GUYS
250.00
56492
12/04/03
LIN050
JAMES LINDSEY
83.78
56493
12/04/03
MCE010
GINA R MC ELROY
8.6.6
56494
12/04/03
MEN030
MISSY MENDOZA
8.66
56495
12/04/03
MOR050
ANTHONY MORENO
83.78
56496
12/04/03
MOU050
LESLIE MOURIQUAND
75.00
56497
12/04/03
OMR100
OMRI & BONI
100.00
56498
12/04/03
ORR100
VIANKA L ORRANTIA
8.66
56499
12/04/03
POW300
POWER PERSONNEL INC
1779.28
56500
12/04/03
PUE050
MARIA L PUENTE
75.00
56501
12/04/03
QUI020
PAUL D QUILL
100.00
56502
12/04/03
RAN043
ED RANDALL
83.78
56503
12/04/03
RIV034
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK
64.00
56504
12/04/03
RIV040
RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD
426.50
56505
12/04/03
ROD100
MOISES RODARTE
83.78
24
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE - AP5005
CHECK
REGISTER 2:OOPM 12/04/03
CITY OF
LA QUINTA
BANK
ID: DEF
PAGE 2
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
PAYMENT
NUMBER
DATE
NO.
NAME
AMOUNT
56506
12/04/03
RUI100
JOHN RUIZ
112.82
56507
12/04/03
SAF020
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
6088.94
56508
12/04/03
SAN075
SANTA ROSA DEVELOPMENT
200000.00
56509
12/04/03
SHA050
ARCHIE SHARP
75.00
56510
12/04/03
SM1010
MARILYN SMITH
100.00
56511
12/04/03
SOU010
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO
396.74
56512
12/04/03
SPE010
STEVE SPEER
8.66
56513
12/04/03
SPRO10
SPRINT
793.91
56514
12/04/03
STA005
JAMES STAIGHT
83.78
56515
12/04/03
STA044
DARREN STANLEY
62.50
56516
12/04/03
STA100
STATE WATER RESOURCES
2607.00
56517
12/04/03
TIM075
TIME WARNER CABLE
699.95
56518
12/04/03
TWI100
TWIST & SHOUT DISC JOCKEY
200.00
56519
12/04/03
TYL050
ROBERT T TYLER
100.00
56520
12/04/03
UNIO05
UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT
182.00
56521
12/04/03
UNU050
UNUM LIFE INS
2803.82
56522
12/04/03
USD050
US DEPT OF EDUCATION
170.83
56523
12/04/03
VER200
VERIZON
3713.60
56524
12/04/03
WEI050
MARK WEISS
61.00
56525
12/04/03
WIL005
W ALLAN WILBUR
75.00
56526
12/04/03
WISO10
WANDA P WISE-LATTA
83.78
56527
12/04/03-
WRI050
ROBERT S WRIGHT
75.00
CHECK TOTAL
263,608.01
25 � 4
r
N
(N
OD
%D
N
OD
N
0)
NOD
r-I
Ln
r-i
O
�- 4
M
CA
O
IV
N
N
O
H
z
N1
O
C
N
� W
U
E
C7
E
C7
E
C7
E
C7
E
C9
E
C7
U'
E
U
E
E
Ol
ON
rn
E
W
C7
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E
rn
E
W
E
rn
E-+
ON
E-
E
M
M
O
O
O
MLO
O
CO
OD
M
O
d1
O
O
O
O
o
N
O
r
r
OD
O
M
OD
r
W
z
O
N
O
O
O
O
M
�D
0D
M
r
M
OD
M
OD
0D
OD
M
O
HOD
�D
O
,-1
rl
O
�
�
H
a
O
0
O.
O
O
O
OD
r
O
O
OD
r
OD
r
M
00
O
O
C11
M
OD
OD
O
N
O
O
O
O
14
O
H L
W r
M
OD
M
OD
OD
O
u7
M
w
W OD
';
1-4
i
z
z
>
>
FC
W
U
W ra
�
A rl
W
W 1-4
�[+
0
A
0
U
aW a
H
ra
UW 0
AHU
z
�
WwE+
HOO
Oc
0
O
OA
O
O
EU0
E+
H H
W
W E
H
E
H H
E 4
H
Cl) H
E-H
E+
.
H
�n
H
off
E
a
o a
g
a
zo
a
a
cn
Uncn
En a
8
U a
wo
a
ao
a
aQ
H a
O
A
U a
p
a Q
4-1a.
u)oo
cn a
Hn°
A
>
2
a
O
A
z z
H A
z z
r$ Q
U z
W
A
W
a z
H A
Hz
Q A
U z
4
U z
z
o z
4 z
A z
z
U
H
N
14
R W
>
W
>
H W
A>
W
x
W W
a>
x W
U>
H W
A>
H W
A>
H
x
O W
z>
W
a>
W
lu
H
A
v�
a
w
E
3
3
>
a
a
�
U W
H A
a
o
Ln%
o
H
z
>
m
l0
LO
M
>
O
l0
`n
A
z
N
M
z
o
O
H x
a
cn
w
as a
� o
o w
H
a
W
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
to
0
ko
0
o
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
pp
o
0
0
o
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
z
z
r
M
V
rn
0
LO
M
N
Ln
M
w
�
M
l0
CA
O
LO
M
N
-4
M
N
M
N
r
O
l0
ao
M
N
r
M
N
M
N
E-H
z
:D
0
O
O
p
ri
O
O
0
0
M
to
r i
M
u)
r-1
ri
O
si'
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
e-1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
U
r�
Cl
o
1-4
O
r-1
o
.-i
0
�4
0
0
0
1-4
0
0
0
0
0
H
W
U
W
z
a
U
cn
z
U
O
H
U')
Q
w
a
co
H
as
a
H
1
Cl)
4
cn
W
A
w
U
o
w
FC
x
A
a
H
Q
A H
W
oa
0
H
3
H
3
o
m
m
Q
�
as
a
W
Q
a
01
a
0
Ol
��
a
x
w
w
a
O
"
a
FC
H
z
h
S
Mc
0
�j
z
rn
T
�A
o
o
H
Ln
r
u)
r
o
o
0
r-+
0
0
0
cW
o
OD
r
ko
o
'n
0
0
0 >,
U E
rl
N
0
W
0
O
0
H
o
E
H
cm
O
0
A
o
H
H
0
0
.a
0
a
4
'-1
a
0
z
H
Un
Q
U H
U
o
ao
a
A
E
a
H
s
co
w
w
U
U
U
U
U �C
26 �'
.-1 N m u7 V' to t0 r w m O .--4 N M t0 O fM O
M M M M M M cM M m V' V' W V' OD OD N
O
H Z
M
0
0
N
U
Ch
C9
C9
U
U
C7
C7
C7
(7
C7
C7
C7
(9
C7
0
C9
t9
C7
N
.-+ W
H
F
E
E
E
E$
E
E
E
F.
E
E
E
E
W
E
W
C7
FC
WWW
W
W
W
w
w
w
w
W
W
W
w
w
H
W
H
H
E-+
a s
H
E+
E-F
H
H
H
H
E+
H
H
H
H
H
H
M
M
O
O
O
OD
O
O
LO
O
V'
O
O
t0
N
OD
ao
O
O
�
[-4
O
O
O
r
O
O
u7
v
U)
OD
V'
t0
O
0%
r
O
O
t0
WZ
O
O
O
M
N
V;
L�
O
N
C
OD
.-1
r.
M
O
O
'J
N
N
N
OD
V'
N
Cl
d'
O
kD
LO
r
O
m
OD
r
O
�+
O
V'
C'
V'
r
N
M
tD
O
M
M
M
H
N
OD
O
OD
O
M
co
O
O
O
0
r
O
r
O
V'
r
M
O
M
r
N
M
H N
O
o
tD
OD
OD
W r
o
CA
.N-1
N
M
H
A
U
U
U
Z
H
H
U
H
Aa
na
A
a
000a
oa
zza
s
�
4
a
a
a 9
a 4
o
O Q
E-H
4 4z
H
4
E4
H
z
O
E-+
O
n
O
E 4
A
co E+
O
Cl) O
O
O O
A
W
H
H
z
fx
p4 H
Z E+
>+
>+ H
E+
Z H
H
U H
H
U
E+
W
W
W
H
H
H
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
H
E"4
aiv�i�v�iv�i�v�i�0
>a
0
00oa
ag
zza
�S
HS
"o
a
Uz
Hz
zz
U
zU
z
z
Uz
ooz
fxaafzfxaaaz
H w
x W
W
H
H
m
W
W
>
FC
H
FC
H
FC W
H
H w
A
x
x w
w
H
W
H
W
H
W
H
W
H
w
H
W
H
W W
H
A
U 9
W
A
a
a
a
w
H
H
FC
r•C
FC
�
rC
Q
FC
�C
w
�
to
U
U
U
A
A
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
E
a
UW
r-4
r-I
O
0
0
0
O
O
O
o
M
0
M
0
M
0
O
0
O
f
;
W
O
01
O
co
N
w
U')
-W
M
M
M
M
M
w
w
w
N
N
O
O
W--I
LO
0
e-I
r-i
H
H
H
0
0
0
7
H A
H
.7.
0)
C1
01
V•
u')
u7
a
0
v
to
V•
0
a
r
O
r
O
r
O
O
O
H
(]
'jam
V
tD
V'
t0
V'
t0
Un
M
V'
z
Z
H ai
a
ca
w
f» a
f 0
o w
H
x
o
Co
Co
0
o
o
N
M��
r-+
�
o
0
0
0
W
O
O
o
0
o
O
o
o
M
to
tD
t0
o
w
o
O
O
o
pq
O
O
o
o
r
r
o
O
tD
t0
tD
W
t0
O
O
o
0
0
LO
ul
L
�Ul)
H
H�
H
H
H
rn
rn
z
M
01
0%
fM
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
m
m
M
O
O
M
tD
t0
t0
N
tD
t0
t0
t0
t0
t0
t0
t0
t0
W
N
LO
N
z0
0
0
0
r
M
V'
a•
a
sr
o
-+
•-+
O
M
�4
O
Co
o
u)
Lo
Lo
un
un
u7
un
Ln
0
0
0
Cl
0
r
r
r
O
.-+
.-+
M
V•
-r
sr
V•
sr
-w
o
V'
O
U
a
o
o
0
o
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
a•
�
�
ri
�4
�
v-4
�
�
�
�
�
�
-4
�
U
U
W
W
W
W
W
>4
>+
�r
W
W
W
z
z
a
4
a
a
a
a
a
s
z
W
H
H
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
oM
E
E
E
a
0
0
0
U
0
U
�a
>4
w
>•
W
a4
W
%•
w
>+
w
�H
w
?H
w
%+
w
>+
w
>+
w
A
W
a
U
H
a
s
a
a
A
a
a
a
a
A
W
C9
H
N
w
A
w
a
W
A
H
cn
a
s
4
aa
a�
a
a
Q�
a
a
aa
a
a
O
3
z
z
z
Q
w
tD
H
E-4
F-4
a
7
>
>
>
>
>
>
(D
a
a
a
a
a
A
O
H
o
0
U
0
c�
0
U
z
40
w
w
a
w
a
w
a
w
w
w
w
w
w
a
a
a
0,
o
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
w
H
a
o
H
U
H
U
H
Cy
/y
U
R('i
U
Q
U
FC
U
4
U
4
U
i1'i
U
Q
U
4
U
�
U
a'
H
z
z
z
H
z
A
x
x
x
T�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�C
14
fWy
cl)
z
U
U
U
CO
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
A
in
a
E-H W
z O
W
>
,n
Ln
,n
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u7
LO
o
o
O
T- 4
M
M
o
OD
OD
OD
00
o
OD
OD
Ln
o
N
N
0. }4
o
0
0
o
O
O
o
0
0
Co
0
o
0
C)
o
.-I
z
-4
0
H
x
H
M:x
H
fx
x
4
0
4
0
4
0
4
0
Q
0
4
0
4
0
0
4
0
W
0
9
A
^a
W
g
U H
RC U
UOU
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
A
27
1-4
r-i
V'
Ol
rl
M
N
N
m
V'
Ln
to
Lo
l-
Ln
O
Ln
m
o
Ln
V
N
Ln
r+
N
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
E
z
M
O
N
M
U
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C�
U'
C7
C7
C7
C9
C7
L-i
W
E
E
W
E
W
W
E
W
F
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
rn
a
C7
s
Q
o4
W
E
E
E
H
E
H
E
E L
EL
E
H
H
E-+
E-L
H
E
M
M
O
Ol
H
N
Ol
l0
M
r-i
rl
Cl
rl
E-L
tG
ri
N
tD
N
N
rl
Ln
OD -
O1
Ol
Ln
Ln
l-
O
O
W"z
O
O
M
00
M
M
OD
Ln
O
O1
rt
01
rt
C
O
t0
0
sro
O1
O1
01
H
rl
O1
M
m
Ln
i`
i`
l-
O
Ol
Ln
".,
,4
Ln
M
.-L
Ln
OD
ON
rl
M
N
a
to
ko
o
-W
Lo
10
o
C+
to
to
H
N
W
N
N
rf
rt
O
00
OD
M
OD
M
M
O
m
O1
O1
H
0)z0
H
h
1
x
x
H
Az
A
a
o a
a
z
E
H
H E
H
E
H
H
E
U
U
U
U
U
U E
(9
O
O
cn O
a O
Cl) O
U) O
rn
O
m
O
(n O
>
>
>
>>
U
U
>, O
W
H
H
z EH
a E-L
z E
z H
z
E
z
E 4
z Ei
m
�n
to
to
W>>
U) H
�
U
H
EA
a
C4
H
G4
a
a o;
H
- 04
H
oG
H
a
H
o4
H
rz
U
U
U
U
U
O
u?
>
a
g
0 8
"' OQ
�a $
�a 0
S$
8
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a OQri
z
U
z
U z
m z
U z
U z
U
z
U
z
U z
H
E
H
H
H
H
E4
H z
Q
H
Cl)
W
H W
W"
W
H W
H
W
H
W
H W
U
U
U
U
w
U
w
U
w
U
w
U W
w>
a
w
>
Q>
,, >
Q>
Q>
Q>
Q>
Q>
w
w
w
a
a
\
Q
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
x
E
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
H
A
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
zLOE
0
H
Q
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
M
Q
I
z
>
>
>
>
>
>
qw
rI
H
ai
a
4
as
w
a�
a
O
O
w
H
ac
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
rn
N
rt
M
c•
o0
0
0
w
0
O
Co
O
O
O
O
O
H
M
w
w
LD
110
to
Lo
O
O
0
pq
o
o
O
O
O
O
0
0
w
w
w
%o
0
j
H
rt
rt
ri
rt
rl
L-a
r-
r,
r
r-
r-
r
r-
r-
rt
M
%o
iM
M
M
M
CY)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
,z
N
to
N
N
N
N
N
w
W
w
W
l0
%o
W
to
N
H
z
O
M
O
O
:D
O
Ln
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
O
Q
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
V
V'
V'
Vw
V'
V•
V'
M
O
U
U
rt
rl
rl
rl
rl
rt
rt
rt
rt
r-i
ri
�1
r4
ri
rr
rl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
0
O
O
o
rl
rl
rl
r-I
r♦
rl
r--1
rl
rl
rl
rl
rl
.�
rl
rl
r♦
E+
H
E4
E
H
E
H
E
U)
cn
W
cn
C/)
cn
cn
m
H
Q
H
Q
H
Q
H
Q
H
Q
H
Q
H
Q
H
Q
M
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O.O
0
0
a
>
c
c�
a
a
H
z
H
a
a
a
a
a
4
U
U
C44
z
W
0
N
9
>
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
z
W
a
E
h
a
:D
U'
H
x
a
L
Oa
H
a0
x
LPL
H
H
H�
H
a
a
H
O
>+
a
O
v
z
O
�
E
H
Q
W
a
W
a
W
a
W
a
W
a
W
a
W
a
W
w
U
x
H
x
(raWj
O
H
H
H
V:
•z
CO-i
tD
CI
H
H
H
H
H
z
O
>
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
«a
U')
rt
O
rt
M
14
O
-4
ri
rl
ri
ri
-4
rt
rt
M
H
r1
O
rt
O
CD
Co•--1
a
AG
O
a
CD
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
•--i
z
0
o4
wa'
z
w
N
a
w
o
x
E
E
E
E
E
z
x
o
28
y
-W
N
W
I
OD
M
l—
[-
. H
O
lfl
IV
N
.-I
t0
OD
cP
l�
N
'-I
0%
(r.Y
F
O
z
M
O
N W
F
E
m
2:
W
W
C7
Fc
W
W
rn
W
W
W
W
W
W
F
W
F
F
F
a s
E4
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
M
M
0
00
rn
Co
w
ao
0
0
%0
ao
O
w
z
O
M
U)
O
M
00
O
M
O
OD
C1
M
O
OD
01
U)
OD
OD
O
C
>i
O
rl
U)
N
ri
QQi
Co
O
OD
O)
O
00
610
lD
OD
O
O
l0
t0
O
O
C,
t�
O
I�
t0
l0
[�
O
O
O
CD
o
ao
�-+
o
OD
A rn
O U)
OD
OD
z r
U)
r/
U)
H N
0
E
H
W
C7
W
C7
a
w
A
0
o
w
w
o
A
a
A a
a s
a s
o
a
s
a
4$4
a
a s
a
H Fc
a
rC rC
z
F
F
H
a E 4
04 F
F
F
F
F
W F
F E+
F
U
O
O
00
U) O
10
E O
w O
to O
W O
to O
O
Ho
U)O
>
fn
EA
F
H E-+
F
W F
H EA
F
F
H F
a EA
z F
z EH
H
U
H
a
H
a-
H
04
a
U 0G
O 04
a
F
H
W
p4
C9 a
S
a
4.) x
A�A
z 04
aag
AaAaA
W g
A
>a$H
a z
U z
z
U
z
z z
U z
A z
F z
U z
U z
U z
U z
O z
W
H W
F
H
U)
w
z W
H W
W
Fc W
H W
H W
H W
hI W
F W
w >
A >
z
W
>
>
A >
Z >
z >
A >
A >
A >
A >
U) >
W
O
A
a
W
\
O
W
W
w
W
H
E
E
U
o
04
E
"a
A
E
z
E
w
W
M
A
o
0
IU-1
a
O
0
N
> I
>
z
A
N
ON
2
O
0
H
A
z
z
H a4
a
ao
� a
O
O w
F
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
w
o
0
0
0
o
O
o
o
O
o
O
M
pq
o
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
0
o
O.
Ln
Ol
r-1
M
�0
.-I
H
rI
ri
C1
t0
rl
U)
z
O
M
N
U)
M
fM
M
m
O
LO
M
O
U)
U)
N
N
t0
N
N
N
N
U)
l0
N
F
z
rl
O
O
lw
O
O
O
CDri
d'
O
l0
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U)
O
O
O
r1
O
O
r4
O
C
U
R(,
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
rl
rl
r-I
H
ri
r-I
ri
H
r-I
r I
H
ri
N
U)
W
>+
W
A
>+
C9
O
U
A
C)
A
FC
H
H
F'
rZC
F
a
w
a
>,
o
O
z
w
x
H
w
a
N
W
01
z
U
x
w
W
O
a
z
O
v°)
Q
a
E
o
o
Ix
W F
z
z
U
z
a
a
H
H
E
H
H
'�
a
E
z
w
c'
I
w
x
>
a
a
w
Rc
to
x
A
H
w
a
z
o
U)
zo
w
U)z
F
U)
0
�
a
>
p>
o
o
CD
o
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
r-I
O
Ln
M
U)
ri
M
U)
LO
O
O
O
O
rl
O
N
CD
O
CD
O
O
a
rl
a
rl
a
M
a
c°� H
a
U
Ol
a
z
w
z
a
29
z
N
M
00
U7
W
C
r`
W
M
l0
U)
to
O
0)
to
N
a
l0.
W
00
0D
H
W
C
r-I
1
l0
0)
W
p(
O
H
z
M
O
N
U
U'
(D
0
(9
U
C7
01
C7
0
0
0)
C7
E
C7
E
C7
W
F
E
E
E
E
rn
rn
W
E
W
E
W
ON
W
W
W
C7
FC
W
W
W
W
W
W
H
H
E
E 4
E-H
H
H
w a
W
H
H
H
H
E
H
F
M
M
O
O
O
O
OD
O
O
co
00
C
C
Co
Cl
O
O
O
H
[-a
O
Co
O
O
t-
O
to
l-
f-
O
CA
O
(Zsj
z
O
O
tf)
O
M
q;
M
M
01
00
O
O
U)
t-
O
O
n
t0
h
r-
O
OD
W
N
00
OD
N
00
O
O
H
�H
r-
U)
'" 4
qw
Q
0
O
a
N
OD
O
O
00
O
O
00
N
V'
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
r-
O
LO
00
M
01
U)
O
M
U d'
A t0
M
N
00
O
V7
r
z0
O
OD
WA l0
NV�
coH
O
O
O
>
t0
O
H
H
H
H
>
j4
N
a
H
x
>
x
z
H
H
w
w
a
z
w a
z$4
za
a RC
R
h a
A
A
4
m a
W a
U a
4
4 a
a
w A
a 4
A
z
U
U H
a H
H
F
\ H
E-t
RC F
H H
E+
P4 E+
a H
o
>>
O
o
0 0
V)
o
to o
O
O
(n
a. o
a o
w 0
0
(n
o H
E
O F
H
E
w H�
F
Ha
H
Fx
H
zU
aoH
4 Fz
H
H
CD x
a
r1
+) a
H
H
a
U a
H
O
a
H
U
Q
o
00
00
Qa
Q
a Q�Q
t-t
aVI
iz
O z
"
z z
U
z
o
z z
A z
FC z
U
M z
FC z
A z
O z
H
U
07
E-t
z
H W
E4 W
W
H
w
H W
W
H w
H
E w
H W
W
H W
H
A
w
z
z>
cn >>
A>
a>
a>
A>
A
H>
z>
A>>
W
A
O
O
H
W
H
\
W
W
W
W
z
H
x
E
U
U
x
a
z
w
a
z
E
a
A
M
N
o
H A
w
Oo
0o
M
O
N
N
>
z
( V
N
lw
H A
H
z
N
O
O
z
z
z
H x
a
cu
W
m a
1 O
o w
H
x
a�
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
w
M
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
rid
to
to
O
O
O
an
O
O
O
O
O
to
U)
Ol
Ol
H
to
r t
.- i
rl
r t
M
to
Ol
O
rl
M
z
O
O
O
O
M
01
N
M
M
O
M
O
to
N
U)
to
in
to
N
k0
N
N
N
r-
N
%0
H
10
tp
H
O
t0
O
O
O
V'
O
w
r"I
O
Ln
to
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
qw
-0
C
O
Cn
O
O
O
T -1
O
M
C
O
U
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
sf
O
O
0
0
O
cw
N
H
r-4
A
a
�z,
z
a
U
w
U
U
�
U
a
p+
A
H
W
z
z
H
H
H
W
x
z
z
z
a
O
z
a
W
A
a
H
w H
a
s
a
D
a
W
w
o
N
N
A
a z
w
w
Of
A
A
x
H
H
°�
O
Ww
v7
H
a
s
a
A
A
�
U)
U)
a
s
O
H
a
ac
w
S
w
3
H
a
a
w
>
w
>
w
H
z
x
z
x
w
Gu
H
x
Ua,
a
w
a
w
a
a
o
o
U
cn
zz
F w
z 0
w
>
o
0
0
o
M
O
o
O
o
o
to
o
0
,D,
O
O
to
N
C
O
O
O
N
r-
to
o
H
W
>
A
H
H
r0*t
2
�C
H
U
3
3
>
v
a
s
a
a
a
a
a
a
s
cn
30
[�
OD
OD
0)
OD
01
O
N
CA
01
O
to
l0
r-1
tp
qw
l0
1�
l�
OD
d'
E
z
M
O
V'
O
U
C9
C7
C7
C7
C7
0
C7
C9
M
CA
CA
N
ON
rn
ON
rn
(Wry
W
W
W
W
E+
W
E
E
E-H
E-E
a
s
E+
E
E
E
E
E
E
M
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
M
E
tp
a%
r%
O
01
O
O
O
OD
OD
W
z
tC
OD
M
M
N
01
Ol
OD
ko
O
W
01
w
O
N
O
r-I
co
r♦
O
OD
r-
r-1
F:c
O
M
N
N
a
p
�O
ri OD
O
O
U)
01
O
O
O
O
O
N
OD
p
r-
to
O
O
p
tD
OD
M C4
Q N
z I�
01
O
O
N
M
W
A
p
0)
0) co
E
H O
0)
O
O
co
O
r--I
M
r♦
r♦
- OD
N
I
O N
z
a
•
W
3
I
wi
x
cx
n
c
w
z
A
w
cn
Fi
H
E1
W
U
H
o a
a A a
a s
o a
� a
o
a�
Z
a
rC
FC RC
4<
FC 4
z<
w 4
H
z
E
E
E
E E
6 E
\ E+
U E
E E
E
a E
O
O E
cn O
U'
1
O
O
O
W O
O cn O
1 O
cn O
U O
�-+ O
O O
I
E•r
Z E
U
E
E
E
E
E.4
14 1-4
Q E
Z E-+
U E
�
�
E
a
Pp4
Izi
C4
U
>
HE
C4 C4
C4
W
[X4 C4
EH C4
O a:
t9 C4
+3 1%
C4
41
H
>
a
C4
OA
� "8
q
U)
o a 8
w o
O
A
w o
A
U o
W A
z O
H A
m O
-4 A
A O
E A
ri
z
H
U
W
z
W
Cl) z
W
U z
H W
W
z
z U z
W H W
r1 A
A z
W
E
H z
W
z
1% z
W W
P4 z
W
z z
W
A z
W
a z
1-1W
A
>
a>>
E>>
a>
H>
a
A
a>
w>
x>
w>
z>
U)
c7
E
a
a
a
H
w
a
a
cn
a
UW
It)
OD
o
M
CD
H
A
pG
t0
LO
O
O
O
P
>
1
>
W
tt7
H
ri
Ul
(V
010
H
A
H
rn
N
OA
OD
H
Z
CD
a
M
O
M
O
A
O
O
00
z
H
,Y.
a
a
C1
W
m
a
1
O
o
w
H
a4
0
0
0
0
Cl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
O
O
O
o
O
O
o
o
O
o
o
O
O
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
'zJ
a%
r•i
In
ri
ri
(A
O1
lD
Ol
1n
O1
r-1
z
N
M
M
M
N
Cl
O
Ln
O
N
m
N
%D
N
%0
N
N
W
t.0
LO
N
N
N
E
z
1-
O
M
O
O
M
N
d'
r1
CD
O
CD
O
O
M
p
to
M
O
O
Ln
ri
O
O
CD
O
N
O
<n
O
r•I
O
V
O
O
O
U
. U
r-•I
ri
r-I
r••I
r4
1-4
N
r-I
O
ri
O
ri
O
ri
O
r1
O
r-1
r-I
O
r-1
O
r-/
O
r 4
O
t1'
O
In
r-I
ri
r•1
ri
r-1
W
E
U
W
O
U
0
h
A
z
U
co
H
0
O
a
H
Ln
U)A
C4
E
D
w
a
as
D
a
o
H
1
za
Ga
U
W
H
FC
W
W
D."
E
i+
S
a
z
z
w
Hvi
Q
a
E
H
E
pq
H
a
cn
m
3
RC
3
E
A
a
a
fC
z
U)
w
W
E
a
w
E
w
A
p'
�C
p
H
W
cP�
E+
H
w
to
W
O
E-4
z
Q
O
EW+
pa,
rC
Iz-I
3
z
D
O
C/)
z
cn
W
E
h
A
Cl)
E
E
a
O
EA
W O
>
0
o
O
un
IV
O
LO
o
o
LO
o
0
0
o
O
o
O
r-I
o
H
a
off
0
a
5
W
'
V
IEi
O
w
E4•
E-4
EE-H
HS
>+
E
z
O
z
O.
a
U
cn
coto
to
cn
co
E
E
3
r.
1
M
u1
r
0D
rn
r
r-I
m
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
0D
r4
co
O
E4
z
M
0
N r
U
C7
C9
0
0
Q)
C7
C7
C7
0
C7
H W
E+
X:
E2:
E
E
E
E
E
U'
w
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E FC
.4
CQ
H
H
Er
E+
E♦
E+
H
Eq
Ei
E-4
a a
M
M
M
M
LO
r-i
OD
O
O
O
00
O
�--�
E I
O
00
H
In
N
0
o
O
r
O
O
o
z
a
Iri
aD
.�
ui
cri
In
ao
-W
m
-W
N
M
M
M
r
ODC)
r
OD
N
a'
M
a
M
w
M
O
O
O
OD
O
N
00
t0
O
O
r
O
o
ri
r-i
In
ri
Lr
a
r
OD0
r
F
rr-I
r
0
M
H
H
O
E4
Ff
E♦
a
a
w
W
cn
h
z
a -I
E
z
z
z
H
a
EE-+
E-4
w E-I
a
E-
am
E
H
-
W
E+
z
C+
E-4
E+
E-f
E-1
H
+
ati E
w
w
Iv -I
a
a
>>>°
a
a
a
a
s
O
a
gca
to
co
COa
S
g
a
o
a$
a g
z
u
z
w
w
w
w
c7
z
x
x
z
o
z
u
z
o z
h-1
fn
W
z
z
z
z
H
W
U
U
W
E-4
W
H
W
E 4 W
w
>
O
o
0
o
a>
z
z>
cn
>
A>
cn >
cri
a
a
a
a
H
a
s
x
W W
0
o
a
►U-I A
p4
r
W
qw
In
%0
'
N
N
z
z
`X:
M
O
m
CD
a1
H L]
H
p
sv
v
In
H
r- I
>
>
H
z
w
w
r
r
r
O
O
O
q
In
In
r
r
r
z
z
E-+
H x
a
w
w
a� a
1 0
o w
EI
x
o
0
a
o
M
O
O
Co
o
O
w
o
0
a
0
w
O
o
O
O
O
O
o
0
0
ko
O
O
O
O
o
In
In
►n
In
r-1
r
r
ON
H
rn
z
M
M
M
(M
f+M
M
M
O
(Y)
O
%0
W
W
t0
w
w
%0
In
N
In
Ei
M
In
M
In
M
In
M
to
C
u)
N
O
N
O
ri
O
O
O
r-i
O
O
r-I
r-i
r-I
r-I
r-1
r-I
W
Cl
Vw
Vr-I
r-1
14
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-1
O
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I
r-I
ri
H
r-I
r.4
ri
O
O
ul
aC
Ga
E�
W
Ei
H
'
Q
a s
�
o
z
0
>
0
>
0
>
N
>
N
>
vi
H
3
ai
H
3
3
3
3
134
3
U)
a
a
z14
p
a
O }H
U E+
U H
rC U
>
o
o
N
a
>
0
0
N
a
>
6
0
N
a
>
0
0
N
a
>
o
0
N
rx
>
O
un
O
H
3
o
In
O
H
3
o
O
a
3
o
r-I
O
V)
3
O
In
O
H
3
32 41
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
Transmittal of Treasurer's Report
as of October 31, 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: _Sp�_
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated October 31, 2003 for the City of La Quinta.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance
with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in
conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds.
I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are
available to meet next month's estimated expenditures.
Re ctfull submitted•
J hn . Falconer, Fin nce Director
Approved for Submission by:
k
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta
4,1
ATTACHMENT 1
T0 . . N 0
if 4 4 a"
MEMORANDUM
TO: La Quinta City Council
FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director Treasurer
SUBJECT: Treasurers Report for October 31, 2003
DATE: November 25, 2003
Attached is the Treasurers Report for the month ending October 31, 2003. The report is submitted to
the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts Is accomplished by the Finance Department.
The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month:
Investment
Beginning
Purchased
Notes
Sold/Matured
Other
Ending
Change
Cash
($115,765)
$233,514
(1)
$117,749
$233,514
LAW
$17,104,884
9,265,724
(5,000,000)
21,370,608
4,265,724
US Treasuries (2)
$67,063,477
10,036,396
(2,000,000)
31,151
75,131,024
8,067,547
US Gov't Agencies (2)
$27,415,104
2,053,300
25,762
29,494,166
2,079,062
Commercial Paper (2)
$0
0
0
Mutual Funds
$16133 778
1
15,761 685
372,093
15 761,685
Total
127 601478
1$21,588,934
(.$p6761,6851
1 $56 913
$126 485 640
$1 115 838
I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is In compliance with the California
Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy.
As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated
revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of
La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York
Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end.
John M. Falconer I
Finance Director/Treasurer
Footnote
(1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from
the previous month.
(2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the
month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments.
43
[lul
a
n
A
a
U.
LL
a
,6
N
N
8 �
at
W
at
q�
w
LD
h
-01
O
8
T§it
$N
O
gT
—
8
����
g
O
g
O
k
B
9
1
1
cq
Y
p
N
C4
S
C0)
O
M M N
N N N ~
8
X
x
O
`!
UH
'" O "•
O
O
S
►�
S
off �A
Uf lq 1q
O
N
N
1L
NMt;
Z s—s9
a
g"
LL
g
..
$
S
v�
Q
_
-MEN
.ro��
.9.0
44
M1111
> >
1
aaaaaa aaaaaa
g9Pr
9-sr
IMssssss�
oQO pQO 8O O vaa ppOO ! �808O 8O QS�8O O�
q 0�19��W VCR
Q F
a♦ cm a A -0 3
N
O�p�^�j }S�g�p7OAR��
e60
NXN
OAI O
Gi - - - - - - - - - - - -
>E>8 >8=i1>1
}}YY>YY HIM
�jYrYYYar{
� � Z Z Z
aaaa�aa� ; aaa�
a
a
m
01
----------------
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3333333333333333
0 0 0
11HIMHOH104 0
�8}2Ygr8>Srg>1rg>g>r8gg8g> �
r>
}rrIL
iv,2�c
7 gYSp1��M)�tl1�41�tl)��K� '
r
)
4
—
Mom
�mi
~ $
�
�NlH�1�0
NNI►
O
O
w 8 m
p r
��i
1
1
S
MA88�j1tf0
�SM���
S
S
�1nONo
Sgig
rz
p
CUP
Ntp��NN�
SOf
N
S
N
w;c
P.
r�dtud
v
Mf
N
r
88
co N
�a1 pp
�MNc�—�
�
N
m
O
p
N
m
h
pp
CIO$
Ne,
O
o
q
N
Z �
�aMO
NMOf�
�
h
C4
v
1�
O
M1U W
eN-0� ��
Ip a0
It q
O �
ve
�
VJ —N�Nr-
g
H a
�
LL
_
•
LDc
i °� a
c
g
t
z .
w
i
�Q
aZ
o0o Q
z
00o
Ln to N
�0-0a
M co � Q
m
000tiv� z
m
M M co
M M Z
000
�
d' co O O
�OptoMO
Of
Lq
=
M N N O c c
M
NC WON
C4
H N
C
y� Y 0
C/ __ __ C LL
C m
m m O
co) oo0=1
a.X w
�wmm�mm
C6 C6 = m
m co
Li
m
O
O
m
U m m m a
w
�m
Li
co
O.
c c c c Z
m
� Z m Z Z m m m
C
C
oa >>EEEEra
Q y y m m
m
N .m 3
EcU��m0000u-_c
E
U-U'c6V)c6c6f6f6
SzUgg»»»��
7
O
00
0OQ
a
ooz
to N
O
co co
zz rntn
O
N�
m
O O
�aa
ZZ Mc`
O O
a
0 O
OpOpom
to
co
e-
40
OO���~yy
tAN�N
M
vi
to Y
C
c
_Zm
o N
m
Um)O
�f a. a cn 0
~
m
Y E
F, O
o V1 =
U � m
m
LL
m
O
O
.o
U Nma
O C
m m y
cm O =
? C m L
ca U
N
Z
Z
e
� Z Z m
w, ?-,E�
C
,
Q y m o
r+
m
0u-
c
E
�Ua m
a
m E
m�u-UjUj
�i0g3
4—
cq
ao o
� Go M
OUR
co Coco
co
10 CO
C-4 C%j 04 -
� v
0
O
N
a ao
�w
ill
d co co
w
U.
LL LL
U.
LLU.
'
ado 2IL 191
0.
_
a
I
a
�c
i U!
A ,
L
t`��gw 9ao6iiao�
r-
l�
alt
R$o
o �
3�8'g
�
111
a00000
a
2200000
1
g
lie
OOff
fill
$oI
M�
100000008
ooe
ao0000
Ifigastasacsae
Q
o o
3
>
A
'f
CP
M `
o
O'
♦�..jj �Qj♦
ASIM
��((ff ��.jj ff
«NZINS1
AW
N
o
as00000000000000
$
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 8 a
Nj�tl � 0
a 7Roaoy�oogo��it
>aMOpOH.�.00gO�M1^OG8 O
N IA O w
«N$
�cs�ss,czgss�ssss�c
ja?d�a°ao�ad�ad�ad���
Ai 3
Mori
r•0,0
C4 C'4
•-G�-��
Ne-��N
tocr)M�
oo
�-0���
NNN
NOr-r-r.
NC4 C4
w'iw f�
N
f W)to.0
�xp
�
oC4ci
(V�-���
iOintONm
� �
<y�.-�N
� t�aQ44
N.-N.-v,
towin
$
N
co
OOOO
N
0N��
Z
C4 CM
crfCE
as O N
C4 V C4 cn
a�
(D w co co ap
ss
g
Al
�19O0��01�fxN
N—NON
VP)l 1".*
0fafofo
0������
-2N� NN
�Cq'* M.W
m<OODto
0
CRY OF LA QUANTA
CRY
CRY
RDA
RDA
FA
BALANCE SHEET 10/31/03
FIXED
LONGTERM
FOXED
LONG TERM
FINANCING
LONGTERM
GRAND
CRY
ASSETS
DEBT RDA
ASSETS
DEBT
AUTHORITY
DEBT
TOTAL
ASSETS:
POOLED CASH
(14.941,216.01)
0.00
0.00 40,878,391.88
0.00
0.00
(923.03)
0.00
25,938,252.84
LQRP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH
0.00
0.00
0.00 537,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
537,000.00
INVESTMENT T-BILL/NOTES 3 OTHER
80,500,000.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
80,500,000.00
AUTO MALL CASH
LORP CASH
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 15.652.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15,69.84
BOND REDEMPTION CASH
0.00
0.00
0.00 107,714.86
0.00
0.00
5.83
0.00
107,720.69
BOND RESERVE CASH
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
BOLD PROJECT CASH
0.00
0.00
0.00 30,381.825.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
39.301,825.68
BOND ESCROW CASH
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PETTY CASH
1000 00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,000.00
CASH NL INVESTMENT TOTAL
45.559.M 99
0.00
0.00 80.920.585.26
0.00
0.00
(917.20)
0.00
126.479,452.05
INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
40,665.30
0.00
0.00
60,900.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
101,555.30
PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT
56.807.31
0.00
0.00
(50,610.97)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,188.34
LOW -ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
0.00
0.00
0.00
72,67t.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
72.677.34
INTEREST RECEIVABLE
32,829.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
32.829.89
LOANN40TES RECEIVABLE
0.00
0.00
0.00
12,613,564.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.613.584.62
DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES
2,490.000.55
0.00
2.498,000.55
DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES - CVAG
2,299,096.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2298,096.89
CVAG ALLOWANCE
(2,299,096.89)
(2,299,096.89)
DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS
30,S00.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30.800.37
DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
DUE FROM RDA
15,597.550.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15,597.550.20
INTEREST ACYVANCE47UE FROM RDA
6,125,428.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,125,428.52
ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS
(126,374.00)
1 S,238,815.79
5.112.441.79
NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE
%770.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,770.80
ACCRUED REVENUE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FOXED ASSETS
0.00 306249,652.60
306.249,652.60
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
929.209.62
0.00
929,209.62
TRAVEL ADVANCES
2.525.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,525.00
EMPLOYEE ADVANCES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PREPAID EXPENSES
17 515 36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17,515.36
RECEIVABLE TOTAL
25,206.608.52 305,249.652.80
0.00 17,935,338.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
349,391.599.90
WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT
234,177.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
234.177.00
RENT DEPOSITS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
UTILITY DEPOSITS
75.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
75.00
MISC, DEPOSITS
990.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
998.21
DEPOSITS TOTAL
235,25021
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
235,25021
GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 52.094,306.00
0.00
0.00
0.00.
52.094,306.00
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVAILABLE TO RETIRE LIT DEBT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.AMOUNT
AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR LIT DEBT
0.00
0.00
1.625.20.98
0.00
0.00 158.480,254.00
0.00
7,190,000.00
167,275,513.96
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS
0.00
0.00
1625,259 96
0.00 52 094 306.00 158 460,264.00
0.00
7,190,000.00 219,369,819.96
TOTAL ASSETS 71001,642.72 306249,652.80 1.625.259.96 98,855,924.04 52,094,306.00 158.460254.00 217201 7.190.000.00 095.476.122.12
LIABILITIES:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
14,329.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14,329.44
DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES
10,629.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10,629.06
DIE TO OTHER FUNDS
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,239,445.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3239.445.14
INTEREST ADVANCE4)UE TO CITY
5238,813.79
0.00
0.00
18,357.163.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23,595.976.79
ACCRUED EXPENSES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
INTEREST PAYABLE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAYROLL LIABILITIES
54,905.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
54,905.92
STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS
2,277.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.00R
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,277.09
FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES
105,826.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
105.828.00
SUSPENSE
77.18523
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
77,16623
DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUANTA
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
f PAYABLES TOTAL
5,503.968.53
0.00
0.00 21,596,608.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.100,576.67
i
ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS
1.400.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,400.00
SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
LORD DEPOSITS
0.00
0.00
0.00
18,664.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.664.00
DEVELOPER DEPOSITS
1265,906.57
0.00
0.00
2,835.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1268,741.57
MISC. DEPOSITS
442.414.82
0.00
0.00
?.5.000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
467,414.82
AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS
1,197,645.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,197,645.04
TOTAL DEPOSITS
2.907.386.43
0.00
0.00
46,499.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.953,05.43
DEFERRED REVENUE
2,496,060.55
0.00
0 00 10 495 978.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.992,059.11
OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL
2,490,090.56
0.00
0.00 10,495,978.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12,992.050.11
COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE
0.00
0.00
462.M.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
462,280.37
DEVELOPER AGREEMENT
0.00
0.00
684.688.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
684.686.59
DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
0.00
0.00
478,311.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
478,311.00
DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,150,000.00
0.00
0.00
2,150,000.00
DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,365,254.00
0.00
0.00
7,385,254.00
DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
BONDS PAYABLE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 148 90,000.00
0,00
7,190,000.00 156,135,000.00
TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT
0.00
0.00
1,625,259.96
0.00
0.00
158,460.254.00
0.00
7,190,000.00
167275.513.90
TOTAL LIABILITIES
10,907,415.51 0.00
1,625.259.96 32.139,085.70 0.00 158,400,254.00
0.00
7,190,000.00 210.322.015.17
EQUITY -FUND BALANCE
80.094,22723 306,249,652.60
0.00 66.716.838.34 52.094,306.00 0.00
(91720)
0.00 485,154,106.97
TOTAL LIABILITY NA EQUITY
71001.642.74 306249.652.80
1.623259.96 96.855.924.04 52.094.306.00 158.480.254.00
(917.201
7.190.000.00 095.476.122.14
(0.02) 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 (0.02)
CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL
126.479.452.05
PREMIUMIADISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT
6,188.34
TOTAL
126 485 840.39
10
T *h
4 t 4 4vQ"
December 16, 2003
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:
Transmittal of Revenue and
Expenditure Report for
October 31, 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Transmittal of the October 31, 2003 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for
the City of La Quinta.
2iRespe tfully subm ttedhn M. eFalcon r, Finance Director
Approved for bmission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments 1: Revenue and Expenditures Report, October 31, 2003
J�
ATTACHMENT
CITY OF LA QUINTA
REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2003-10131/03
FUNDS
BUDGET
RECEIVED
96
RECEIVED
General
$19,492,608.00
$4,525,723.54
23.20%
Library
688,400.00
3,955.95
0.60%
Gas Tax Revenue
553,700.00
230,919.64
41.70%
Cmaq/lstea
0.00
0.00
0.00%.
Federal Assistance
165,000.00
0.00
0.00%
Assessment District 2000-1
0.00
1,593.00
0.00%
Slesf (Cops) Revenue
100,700.00
26.55 .
0.00%
Local Law Enforcement
19,918.00
79.65
0.40%
Lighting & Landscaping
854,600.00
0.00
0.00%
Quimby
28,900.00
94,323.57
326.40%
Crime Violent Task Force
0.00
0.00
0.00%
Infrastructure
15,600.00
7,115.39
45.60%
Village Parking
0.00
0.00
0.00%
South Coast Air Quality
240,204.00
472.70
0.20%
LQ Public Safety Officer
2,300.00
2,026.55
88.10%
Interest Allocation
0.00
159,474.91
0.00%
Capital Improvement
74,065,939.05
2,273,753.48
3.10%
Lq Norte Capital Improvement
0.00
0.00
0.00%
Urban Forestry
0.00
0.00
0.00%
Equipment Replacement
376,477.00
327,554.59
87.00%
Information Technology
227,600.00
379,830.80
166.90%
Arts In Public Places
102,600.00
153,056.76
149.20%
Transportation
602,300.00
1,038,169.77
172.40%
Parks & Recreation
251,000.00
325,000.20
129.50%
Civic Center
204,200.00
200,619.28
98.20%
Library Development
112,500.00
152,093.73
135.20%
Community Center
57,200.00
66,169.50
115.70%
Street Facility
9,400.00
14,482.93
154.10%
Park Facility
3,000.00
3,482.65
116.10%
Fire Protection Facility
33,100.00
58,515.77
176.80%
Library Development (County) Facility
204,100.00
716.85
0.40%
La Quinta Financing Authority
690,330.00
493,882.39
71.50%
RDA Project Area No.1
56,032,087.00
28,083,912.48
50.10%
RDA Project Area No. 2
63,092,267.00
364,203.79
0.60%
Total
$218,226 030.05
$38 961 156.42
17.90%
CITY of LA QUINTA
EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS
07/01/2003-10131103
FUNDS
BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
ENCUMBERED
REMAINING
BUDGET
PERCENT
General
$22,212,335.06
$4,695,914.80
($1,151.25)
$17,517,571.51
21.1%
Library
409,137.00
0.00
0.00
409,137.00
0.0%
Gas Tax
758,906.00
184,566.64
0.00
574,339.36
24.3%
Cmaq/lstea
595,235.00
0.00
0.00
595,235.00
0.0%
Federal Assistance
157,505.00
0.00
0.00
157,505.00
0.0%
Proposed Assessment District
142,507.21
0.00
0.00
142,507.21
0.0%
Slesf (Cops) Revenue
100,000.00
0.00
0.00
100,000.00
0.0%
Local Law Enforcement
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Violent Crime Task Force
0.00
528.05
0.00
(528.05)
0.0%
Lighting & Landscaping
854,600.00
284,866.64
0.00
569,733.36
33.3%
Quimby
201,583.00
115,941.16
0.00
85,641.84
57.5%
Infrastructure
2,152,149.00
406,812.70
0.00
1,745,336.30
18.9%
Village Parking
(1,892.85)
0.00
0.00
(1,892.85)
0.0%
South Coast Air Quality
231,231.00
5,603.82
0.00
225,627.18
2.40/6
Lq Public Safety Officer
2,000.00
0.00
0.00
2,000.00
0.0%
Interest Allocation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Capital Improvement
74,065,939.04
2,273,753.48
3,295.00
71,788,890.56
3.1%
Lq Norte Capital Improvement
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Urban Forestry
1,100.00
0.00
0.00
1,100.00
0.0%
Equipment Replacement
380,641.00
91,862.64
0.00
288,778.36
24.1%
Arts In Public Places
479,793.28
15,006.48
0.00
464,786.80
3.1%
Transportation
2,319,796.30
227,241.97
0.00
2,092,554.33
9.8%
Parks & Recreation
618,563.85
288,428.30
0.00
330,135.55
46.6%
Civic Center
531,969.14
106,582.73
0.00
425,386.41
20.0%
Library Development
4,074,930.31
54,886.04
0.00
4,020,044.27
1.3%
Community Center
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Street Facility
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Park Facility
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Fire Protection
1,500,000.00
324,630.73
0.00
1,175,369.27
21.6%
Library County DIF
400,000.00
0.00
0.00
400,000.00
0.0%
Information Technology
694,781.00
200,740.12
0.00
494,040.88
28.9%
La Quinta Financing Authority
558,723.58
495,334.00
0.00
63,389.58
88.7%
RDA Project Area No. 1
88,795,299.91
11,052,135.77
0.00
77,743,164.14
12.4%
RDA Project Area No. 2
60,644,259.85
1,168,841.97
0.00
59,475,417.88
1.9%
Total
. o
�- A
07/01/2003-10131/03
CITY OF LA QUINTA
GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL
TAXES:
Property Tax
No Low Property Tax Distribution
Document Transfer Tax
Sales Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax
Franchise Tax
TOTAL TAXES
LICENSE & PERMITS:
Business License
Animal License
Building Permits
Plumbing Permits
Electrical Permits
Mechanical Permits
Misc. Permits
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
FEES:
Sale of Maps & Publications
Community Services Fees
Bldg & Safety Fees
Community Development Fees
Public Works Fees
TOTAL FEES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Motor Vehicle In -Lieu
Motor Vehicle Code Fines
Parking Violations
Misc. Fines
AB939
County of Riverside Grant
State of California. Grant
Fire servicesCredit
CSA152 Assessment
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
INTEREST
MISCELLANEOUS
Miscellaneous Revenue
Litigation settlement
Cash Over/(Short)
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
TRANSFER IN
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
REMAINING
BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET
573,300.00
6,652.07
566,647.93
808,100.00
2,641.13
805,458.87
487,300.00
159,110.98
328,189.02
4,200,000.00
1,184,735.76
3,015,264.24
4,055,300.00
360,515.22
3,694,784.78
597,600.00
116,540.51
481,059.49
10,721,600.00
1,830,195.67
8,891,404.33
180,700.00
50,757.60
129,942.40
17,500.00
4,186.00
13,314.00
412,500.00
569,246.10
(156,746.10)
90,800.00
100,667.20
(9,867.20)
69,000.00
102,032.21
(33,032.21)
37,500.00
63,854.20
(26,354.20)
49,500.00
17,208.50
32,291.50
857,500.00
907,951.81
(50,451.81)
4,950.00
649.37
4,300.63
190,998.00
75,279.64
115,718.36
401,300.00
376,759.74
24,540.26
222,400.00
129,936.28
92,463.72
584,375.00
300,285.31
284,089.69
_
1,404,023.00
882,910.34
521,112.66
1,475,900.00
246,510.38
1,229,389.62
70,700.00
23,350.22
47,349.78
54,400.00
12,540.00
41,860.00
15,000.00
6,481.33
8,518.67
145,000.00
31,561.08
113,438.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,749.45
(3,749.45)
2,857,400.00
0.00
2,857,400.00
150,000.00
175,046.04
(25,046.04)
4,768,400.00
499,238.50
4,269,161.50
1,468,800.00
403,221.79
1,065,578.21
3,000.00
2,145.67
854.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
59.76
3,000.00
2,205.43
794.57
269,285.00
0.00
269,285.00
19,492,608.00
4,525,723.54
14,966,884.46
4
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL
REMAINING
BUDGET
RECEIVED
BUDGET
LIBRARY:
County of Riverside
662,500.00
0.00
662,500.00
Interest
25,900.00
3,955.95
21,944.05
TOTAL LIBRARY
688,400.00
3,955.95
684,444.05
GAS TAX REVENUE:
Section 2105
168,200.00
66,544.80
101,655.20
Section 2106
115,900.00
46,626.40
69,273.60
Section 2107
216,700.00
89,732.71
126,967.29
Section 2107.5
6,000.00
6,000.00
0.00
Traffic Congestion Relief
39,300.00
20,661.68
18,638.32
Interest
7,600.00
1,354.05
6,245.95
TOTAL GAS TAX
553,700.00
230,919.64
322,780.36
CMAQ/ISTEA
CMAQ/ISTEA Grant
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA
0.00
0.00
0.00
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE:
CDBG Grant
165,000.00
0.00
165,000.00
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
165,000.00
0.00
165,000.00
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1
Interest
0.00
1,593.00
(1,593.00)
Assessment Bond Proceeds
0.00
0.00
0.00
Prepayments -sewer assessments
0.00
0.00
0.00
Transfer in
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
0.00
1,593.00
(1,593.00)
SLESF (COPS) REVENUE:
SLESF (Cops) Funding
100,000.00
0.00
100,000.00
Interest
700.00
26.55
673.45
TOTAL SLESF (COPS)
100,700.00
26.55
100,673.45
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE:
LLEBG Funding
19,218.00
0.00
19,218.00
Interest
700.00
79.65
620.35
Transfer in
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL LLEBG
19,918.00
79.65
19,838.35
LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE:
Assessment
854,600.00
0.00
854,600.00
Developer
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL LIGHTING S LANDSCAPING
854,600.00
0.00
854,600.00
QUIMBY REVENUE:
Quimby Fees
25,000.00
92,863.32
(67,863.32)
Interest
3,900.00
1,460.25
2,439.75
TOTAL QUIMBY
28,900.00
94,323.57
5,4 .57
CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE REVENUE:
Member Contributions
0.00
0.00
0.00
Grant revenue
0.00
0.00
0.00
Asset Forfeiture
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL
(continued)
INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE:
Infrastructure Fee
Interest
Transfer in
TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE
VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE:
Interest
TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE:
S.C.A.Q. Contribution
MSRC Funding
Street Sweeping Grant
Interest
TOTAL SCAQ
LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND
Transfer In
Interest
TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY
INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND:
Pooled Cash Allocated Interest
Transfer In
TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND:
CVAG
CVWD
County of Riverside
Joint Powers Ins Authority
City of Indio
SB300 Funding
RCTC
S13821-Bicycle Path Grant
State of California
APP Contribution
Developer Agreement Funding
Litigation Settlements
Transfers in From Other Funds
TOTAL CIP REVENUE
LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND:
Prepayment
Bond Proceeds
Interest
TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP
URBAN FORESTRY
Grant Revenue
Interest
TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY
REMAINING
BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET
0.00
0.00
15,600.00 7,115.39
8,484.61
0.00 0.00
0.00
15,600.00 7,115.39
8,484.61
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
21,800.00 101.00
21,699.00
77,119.00
77,119.00
139,285.00
139,285.00
2,000.00 371.70
1,628.30
240,204.00 472.70
239,731.30
2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00
300.00 26.55 273.45
2,300.00 2,026.55 273.45
0.00 159,474.91 (159,474.91)
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 159,474.91 (159,474.91)
2,865,619.97
129,200.78
2,736,419.19
927,462.40
0.00
927,462.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.26)
0.00
(0.26)
100,000.00
0.00
100,000.00
108,240.00
0.00
108,240.00
208,095.00
8,095.00
200,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000.00
0.00
2,000.00
153,000.00
40,000.00
113,000.00
69,701,521.94
2,096,457.70
67,605,064.24
_
74,065,939.05
2,273,753.48
71,792,185.57
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
N.
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL
(continued)
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND:
Equipment Charges
Capital Contribution
Sale of Fixed Asset
Interest
Transfers In
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND:
Charges for services
Capital Contribution
Sale of Fixed Asset
Interest
Transfers In
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE:
Arts in Public Places
Arts in Public Places Credits Applied
Interest
TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES
TRANSPORTATION
Developer fees
Interest
Transfer in
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION
PARKS & RECREATION
CIVIC CENTER
Developer fees
Interest
Transfer in
TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION
Developer fees
Interest
Transfer in
TOTAL CIVIC CENTER
REMAINING
BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET
317,677.00
317,678.00
(1.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
58,800.00
9,876.59
48,923.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
376,477.00
327,554.59
48,922.41
216,200.00
377,282.00
(161,082.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11,400.00
2,548.80
8,851.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
227,600.00
379,830.80
(152,230.80)
97,500.00
150,587.61
(53,087.61)
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,100.00
2,469.15
2,630.85
102,600.00
153,056.76
(50,456.76)
549,000.00
1,021,655.69
(472,655.69)
53,300.00
16,514.08
36,785.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
602,300.00
1,038,169.77
(435,869.77)
251,000.00
321,708.00
(70,708.00)
0.00
3,292.20
(3,292.20)
0.00
0.00
0.00
251,000.00
325,000.20
(74,000.20)
183,000.00
194,008.34
(11,008.34)
21,200.00
6,610.94
14,589.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
204,200.00
200,619.28
3,580.72
r-
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL
(continued)
LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
Developer fees
Interest
Transfer in
TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY CENTER
Developer fees
Interest
TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER
STREET FACILITY
Developer fees
Interest
TOTAL STREET FACILITY
PARK FACILITY
Developer fees
Interest
TOTAL PARK FACILITY
FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY
Developer fees
Interest
TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY
LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT (COUNTY) FACILITY
Developer fees
Interest
TOTAL LIBRARY DEV (COUNTY) FACILITY
REMAINING
BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET
112,500.00
148,589.13
(36,089.13)
0.00
3,504.60
(3,504.60)
0.00
0.00
0.00
112,500.00
152,093.73
(39,593.73)
48,500.00 64,311.00 (15,811.00)
8,700.00 1,858.50 6,841.50
57,200.00 66,169.50 (8,969.50)
7,500.00 14,058.13 (6,558.13)
1,900.00 424.80 1,475.20
9,400.00 14,482.93 (5,082.93)
2,500.00 3,376.45 (876.45)
500.00 106.20 393.80
3,000.00 3,482.65 (482.65)
32,100.00 58,303.37 (26,203.37)
1,000.00 212.40 787.60
33,100.00 58,515.77 (25,415.77
200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00
4,100.00 716.85 3,383.15
204,100.00 716.85 203,383.15
07/01/2003-10131103
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
REMAINING
BY DEPARTMENT
BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
ENCUMBERED
BUDGET
GENERAL GOVERNMENT:
LEGISLATIVE
677,100.00
213,915.63
0.00
463,184.37
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
778,533.00
214,790.32
4,848.75
558,893.93
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
821,350.00
241,362.87
0.00
579,987.13
PERSONNELIRISK MGT
758,502.00
450,848.74
0.00
307,653.26
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
3,035,485.00
1,120,917.56
4,848.75
1,909,718.69
FINANCE:
FISCAL SERVICES
696,564.00
201,256.19
0.00
495,307.81
CENTRAL SERVICES
726,562.00
287,866.84
0.00
438,695.16
TOTAL FINANCE
1,423,126.00
489,123.03
0.00
934,002.97
CITY CLERK
469,363.00
135,261.35
0.00
334,101.65
COMMUNITY SERVICES
SENIOR CENTER
328,635.00
77,891.18
0.00
250,743.82
PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
692,146.00
178,498.28
0.00
513,647.72
PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS
100,048.00
35,483.20
0.00
64,564.80
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES
1,120,829.00
291,872.66
0.00
828,956.34
POLICE:
POLICE SERVICES
5,231,000.00
325,338.65
0.00
4,905,661.35
TOTAL POLICE
5,231,000.00
325,338.65
0.00
4,905,661.35
BUILDING 3 SAFETY:
BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN
231,925.00
64,575.93
0.00
167,349.07
CODE COMPLIANCE
655,449.00
178,534.05
0.00
476,914.95
ANIMAL CONTROL
229,922.00
65,371.24
0.00
164,550.76
BUILDING
711,239.00
279,252.92
0.00
431,986.08
EMERGENCY SERVICES
48,945.00
24,755.09
0.00
24,189.91
FIRE
2,903,902.00
857.25
0.00
2,903,044.75
CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS
1,061,265.00
686,888.04
0.00
374,376.96
TOTAL BUILDING $ SAFETY
5,842,647.00
1,300,234.52
0.00
4,542,412.48
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN
822,152.00
422,600.54
0.00
399,551.46
CURRENT PLANNING
711,429.00
149,195.18
0.00
562,233.82
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1,533,581.00
571,795.72
0.00
961,785.28
PUBLIC WORKS:
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
259,055.00
72,257.96
0.00
186,797.04
DEVELOPMENT $ TRAFFIC
990,125.00
288,517.08
0.00
701,607.92
MAINT/OPERATIONS - STREETS
2,238,952.00
373,178.44
0.00
1,865,773.56
MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING
1,967,542.00
491,662.92
(6,000.00)
1,481,879.08
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
570,171.00
217,630.43
352,540.57
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
6,025,845.00
1,443,246.83
(6,000.00)
4,588,598.17
TRANSFERS OUT
1,327,715.60
51,141.94
0.00
1,276,573.66
GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
(3,797,256.54)
(1,033,017.46)
0.00
(2,764,239.08)
NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
22,212,335.06
4,695,914.80
(1,151.25)
17,517,571.51
GJ
0
CITY OF LA QUINTA
OTHER CITY FUNDS
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
LIBRARY FUND
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
TRANSFER OUT
GAS TAX
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
TRANSFER OUT
QUIMBY FUND:
TRANSFER OUT
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND:
TRANSFER OUT
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
TRANSFER OUT
CMAQHSTEA
TRANSFER OUT
VILLAGE PARKING
TRANSFER OUT
LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY
CONTRIBUTIONS
LLEBG FUND
TRANSFER OUT
07/01/2003-10131103
REMAINING
BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
409,137.00 0.00 0.00 409,137.00
TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 409,137.00
553,700.00 184,566.64 0.00 369,133.36
205,206.00 0.00 0.00 205,206.00
TOTAL GAS TAX FUND ,
TOTAL QUIMBY FUND 201,583.Q0 115,941.16 0.00 85,641.84
TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 157,505.00 0.00 0.00 157,505.00
14,827.00 5,603.82 0.00 9,223.18
216,404.00 0.00 0.00 216,404.00
TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY ,
TOTAL CMAQIISTEA FUND 595,235.00 0.00 0.00 595,235.00
TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING FUND (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85)
TOTAL LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00
TOTAL LLEBG FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE
PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 528.05 0.00 (528.05)
TOTAL VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE
SLESF (COPS)
TRANSFER OUT TOTAL SLESF (COPS) FUND 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00
LIGHTING 3 LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST:
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 854,600.00 284,866.64 0.00 569,733.36
TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL LTGMNDSCAPING FUND569,733.36
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TRANSFER OUT 2,152,149.00 406,812.70 0.00 1,745,336.30
TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE ,
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1
COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TRANSFER OUT 142,507.21 0.00 0.00 142,507.21
TOTAL AD 2000.1 142,507.21
C`
10
CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2003-10/3l/03
OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET
TRANSPORTATION
PROGRAM COSTS 63,050.06 63,050.06 0.00 0.00
TRANSFER OUT 2,256,746.24 164,191.91 0.00 2,092,554.33
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION ,
PARKS & RECREATION
INTEREST ON ADVANCE 0.00 20,256.00 0.00 (20,256.00)
TRANSFER OUT 618,563.85 268,172.30 0.00 350,391.55
TOTAL PARKS 3 RECREATION ,
CIVIC CENTER
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
204,251.00
68,083.64
0.00
136,167.36
TRANSFER OUT
327,718.14
38,499.09
0.00
289,219.05
TOTAL CIVIC CENTER
,
LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
4,074,930.31
54,886.04
0.00
4,020,044.27
TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY CENTER
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER
STREET FACILITY
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL STREET FACILITY
PARK FACILITY
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL PARK FACILITY
FIRE PROTECTION
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
1,500,000.00
324,630.73
0.00
1,175,369.27
TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION DIF
,
LIBRARY COUNTY
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
400,000.00
0.00
0.00
400,000.00
TOTAL LIBRARY COUNTY DIF
,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
73,295,533.50
2,249,742.97
3,295.00
71,042,495.53
PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND
770,405.54
24,010.51
0.00
746,395.03
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
,
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND
MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP
3,500.00
0.00
0.00
3,500.00
OPERATING EXPENSES-APP
1,800.00
0.00
0.00
1,800.00
ART PURCHASES
325,240.00
0.00
0.00
325,240.00
TRANSFER OUT
149,253.28
15,006.48
0.00
- 134,246.80
TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
,
LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND
PROJECT EXPENSES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND
URBAN FORESTRY GRANT
TRANSFER OUT
TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY GRANT
1,100.00
0.00
0.00
1,100.00
11
CITY OF LA QUINTA
OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET
VILLAGE PARKING
TRANSFER OUT (11892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85)
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
OPERATING EXPENSES 694,781.00 200,740.12 0.00 494,040.88
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND 694,781.00 200,740.12
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
OPERATING EXPENSES 380,641.00 91,862.64 0.00 288,778.36
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
63
12
T 0
4,1f 4 .�Qulafw
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Accepting
Passes to the 2003 Skins Game Golf Tournament at
Trilogy at La Quinta
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting passes to the 2003 Skins Game golf
tournament at Trilogy at La Quinta.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On November 21, 2003, the City of La Quinta received Skins Game passes from
Trilogy at La Quinta, the host golf course of this year's Skins Game golf tournament.
Since the tournament took place November 28-30, 2003, there was no opportunity for
the City Council to accept the passes by Resolution prior to the event. The passes
were distributed consistent with past City practice.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting passes to the 2003 Skins
Game golf tournament at Trilogy at La Quinta; or
2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting passes to the 2003
Skins Game golf tournament at Trilogy at La Quinta; or
64
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
EJ
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING PASSES TO THE 2003 SKINS
GAME AT TRILOGY AT LA QUINTA
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2003, the City of La Quinta received
2003 Skins Game golf tournament passes from Trilogy at La Quinta; and
WHEREAS, the 2003 Skins Game took place November 28 through
30, 2003 at the Trilogy at La Quinta golf course; and
WHEREAS, the City accepted the golf tournament passes and
distributed same to interested City Council Members and City employees
under the direction of the Acting City Manager; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept the golf
tournament passes and ratify the Acting City Manager's distribution of said
passes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. The City of La Quinta hereby accepts the golf tournament
passes.
2. The Acting City Manager's distribution of said golf tournament
passes is hereby ratified.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council held on this 161h day of December, 2003, by the
following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
3 6G
Resolution No. 2003-
2003 Skins Game Passes
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 2
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, CITY CLERK
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
4
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Accepting a
Cash Donation from the Friends of the La Quinta
Library for the City of La Quinta Library Building
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: S
STUDY SESSION:
. PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting a cash donation from the La Quinta
Friends of the Library for the City of La Quinta Library building.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The cash donation, which is in the amount of $53,000, will be deposited in the City of
La Quinta Library Fund (Account #102-000-300-290). A new revenue account will be
established for this contribution in the near future (Account #102-000-484-000).
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Staff is in receipt of correspondence, dated December 1, 2003, from the La Quinta
Friends of the Library ("Friends") regarding a donation for the new City of La Quinta
Library building (Attachment 1). As the cover letter indicates, on October 22, 2003,
the Board of Directors of the Friends approved a motion to donate $53,000 to the City
for the new library building. Specifically, the Friends would like the donated funds to
be used for the Children's Department. In addition to the cover letter, a certification
form was also submitted which has been signed by the President of the Friends and
certifies that no portion of the donated funds have been obtained through book sales.
The Friends group is scheduled to make a presentation to the City Council during this
meeting of December 16, 2003. Staff is informed that several members of the Friends
will be in attendance to participate in and/or witness the presentation.
63
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting a cash donation from the
Friends of the La Quinta Library for the City of La Quinta Library building; or
2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting a cash donation from
the Friends of the La Quinta Library for the City of La Quinta Library building; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. Correspondence from the Friends of the La Quinta Library
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
CASH DONATION FROM THE FRIENDS OF THE
LA QUINTA LIBRARY FOR THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA LIBRARY BUILDING
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2003, the Board of Directors of the
Friends of the La Quinta Library approved a motion to make a $53,000 cash
donation to the City of La Quinta for the new City of La Quinta Library
building; and
WHEREAS, the Friends of the La Quinta Library indicate these donated
funds are to be used for the Children's Department of the new City of La
Quinta Library building; and
WHEREAS, the President of the Friends of the La Quinta Library
certifies that no portion of the donation amount of $53,000 was obtained
through book sales; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept this generous
donation and to direct the City Manager to control expenditure of the
donation for the Children's Department of the new City of La Quinta Library
building.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. The City of La Quinta hereby accepts the cash donation of
$53,000.
2. The City Manager is hereby directed to control expenditure of
said donation for the Children's Department of the new City of
La Quinta Library building.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of December, 2003, by the
following vote to wit:
70
3
Resolution No. 2003-
Friends of the Library Donation
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 2
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, CITY CLERK
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
i
4
Attachment 1
wirr wr JW
FRIENDS OF THE LA QUINTA LIBRARY
78-080 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
760-564-4767
December 1, 2003
City Manager's Office
City of La Quinta
La Quinta, California 92253
Dear City Manager:
On October 22, 2003 the Board of the Friends of the La Quinta Library was
called to order.
MOTION: It was moved by board member, Diane Adolph, that 73% of the
funds ($53,000.00) be contributed to the City's new library, (designated for
the Children's Department) and that the remaining 27% (26,257.56) be kept
in reserve for use by the Friends of the Library.
The motion was second by board member, Diane Gunn.
The motion was carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
�9�j, a� U-) cj�
,; I
Lucy A. c owan, Certified in Volunteer Administration
President, Friends of the La Quinta Library
5
CERTIFICATION REGARDING SOURCE OF DONATION
I, Lucy A. McGowan, the President of the Friends of the La Quinta Library ("La Quinta.
Friends"), do hereby certify as follows:
The La Quinta Friends wish to make a donation in the amount of $ 60c)• to
the City of La Quinta ("City") for the City's new library building. On behalf of the La Quinta
Friends, I certify that no portion of the funds to be donated were obtained through book sales.
The Board of the La Quinta Friends has duly authorized this donation.
Executed on the day of6�ztJ--� , 2003, at La Quinta, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Lucy A. cGowan, President
Friends of the La Quinta Library
ry�
119/015610-0002 6
410891.01 a10/23/03
T4'yl 4 aCP
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Approval to Award a Contract to
Construct the Adams Street at Westward Ho Drive
Traffic Signal Improvement Project No. 2002-06
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve a contract in the amount of $123,936.00 to DBX Inc. to construct the
Adams Street at Westward Ho Drive Traffic Signal Improvement Project No. 2002-
06.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
This project is included within the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP). The following represents the approved budget:
Funding Source
City Infrastructure Funds
Less Prior Expenditures:
Amount Available:
Amount
$175,000
($15,652)
$15 9, 348
Based upon the low bid in the amount of $123,936, the following represents the
anticipated project budget:
Activity
Construction
Inspection/Testing/Survey
City Administration
Contingency
TOTAL
As illustrated, adequate funding is available.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
Budget
$123,936
$ 13,563
$ 8,750
$ 13,099
$15 9, 348
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\C 3.doc
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 CIP on July 16, 2002. This
year's CIP includes installing a new traffic signal at the intersection of Adams
Street and Westward Ho Drive. The proposed traffic signal improvements are
immediately adjacent to the La Quinta Park.
On October 21, 2003, City Council approved the PS&E and authorized staff to
advertise the bid of Project No. 2002-06 Adams Street at Westward Ho Drive
Traffic Signal Improvement with an Engineer's Estimate of $104,700.
On November 19, 2003, one sealed bid was received for the construction of this
project. DBX, Inc., of Temecula CA, presented the only responsive bid in the
amount of $123,936. A detailed bid comparison summary is provided as
Attachment 1.
The following represents how the project is expected to proceed:
City Council Construction Award
Construction Period (90 days)
Project Acceptance
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
December 16, 2003
January through March 2004
April 2004
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
�. Award a contract in the amount of $123,936 to DBX Inc. to construct the
Adams Street at Westward Ho Drive Traffic Signal Improvement Project No.
2002-06; or
2. Do not award a contract in the amount of $123,936 to DBX Inc. to
construct the Adams Street at Westward Ho Drive Traffic Signal
Improvement Project No. 2002-06; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Jimothy onass , P.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2003\12-16-03\C 3.doc 2
{
Approved for submission by:
,
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Bid Comparison Summary
r'
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\C 3.doc 3
ATTACHMENT 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
OO
O
O
�fi
�0
00
d�
�o
M
N
%%0
M
69
O
rt'
w
O
w
-
et
fill,
�o
,'1
110
69
11"
64
10
M
O
el
O
00
O
�o
all
M
�y
64
64
•--
69
64
69
69
--
64
b9
N
-
69
69
69
69
69
64
N
69
69
N
69
69
T.-O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
o
O
O
i
O
O
O
0
O
O
0
o
C
o
C
O
o
6
0
0
in
0
0
0
0
r-+
c
O
�6
0
p
0
N
0
00
0
O
0
O
0
00
0
r-+
0
W
0
O�
0
a�
0
I,
0
N
69
0
O
0
�o
0
O
(=
M
'I"
64
69
O
O
O
O
.-i
69
[�
�p
69
6s
69
69
6�
6s
.�
00
69
N
69
vs
M
c l
00
%
64
69
69
69
69
GS
69
69
Nfps
69
0-0
C4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H
O
O
C
O
C
C
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
C
O
O
C
O
C
C
O
C
0
0
0
O
y
O
W)
O
00
N
O
w
O
Wn
O
O
O
O
O
to
M
O
O
v)
N
O
vn
�o
B
W
M
W
M
�
M
.-i
M
00
\G
M-
r-
.-�
"-
V)
Go
6A
64
69
69
69
6R
69
69
64
69
64
6A
64
69
6q
69
69
fA
69
-
69
O
6—
W
4)
D
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
50
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
wi
r-+
G
NW�
o
o
0
C
0
o
O
0
O
E..,
p
p
o
N
O
o
O
N
M
69
69
N
tn
N
O
to
O
N
e,
W
M
.--i
64
69
69
6R
�,,
^,
N
.--�
69
69
69
.-i
\s
d'
H
69
6f3
69
6R
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
bR
69
—O
ON
d
w-4
.-+
w-i
-4
� H
Ucon
cond
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
dcn
d
d
p
0
0
3
a
a
o
a
U
N
A
�
°
rh
c
,0
3
�
�
�
•�
H
cn
c
°'
N
o
U
c
3
°U
COO
�3
b
00
00
o
a
x
a�
�
o
A,�
m.
6
b
U
U
'�
N�
b
N
N
a,O
A
O
O
O
O
�
�i'
r�
b.
�".,+'
rc
o
G
N
y
-d-o-
N
-
Z
O
b
a''
U
U
'd
b
►ter
N
o
E�EiE-�E-�aa
w
��
a>wWaaen
..>�
o
o-
v�UE-+Uvs
o
Z
r-r
N
enF-100
N
en
'IT
to
�o
[-
00
G1
O
r-+
N
en
�
0-4
K � f
t' lei[n.auTM
OF
9w
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Improvements Associated
with Tract No. 24890-6, Citrus, Brookfield Homes
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: r7
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Accept improvements to Tract No. 24890-6, Citrus, Brookfield Homes, and authorize
staff to release performance securities immediately, as warranty securities have been
received.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None. Since no public improvements were included with Tract No. 24890-6, no
additional maintenance costs are anticipated.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Tract No. 24890-6 is located within the Citrus Country Club, north of Avenue 52,
south of Avenue 501 and west of Jefferson Street (Attachment 1). All improvements
are now complete and all obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement have
been satisfied. Attachment 2 is a Table of Values indicating the performance
securities to be released immediately after City Council approval, as the warranty
securities have been received.
"18
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\C 4.doc 0
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Accept improvements to Tract No. 24890-6, Citrus, Brookfield Homes, and
authorize staff to release performance securities immediately as warranty
securities have been received; or
2. Do not accept improvements to Tract No. 24890-6, Citrus, Brookfield Homes,
and authorize staff to release performance securities immediately as warranty
securities have been received; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Ti othy R. nas , P.E.
ublic Works Dire or/City Engineer
Approved for submission by:
LJ'
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map
2. Table of Values
2 "7
ATTACHMENT 1
�z
W
m
0
0
U'a
co
0
z
Q
AVENUE 50
In
m srrE
a
0
Q ctn�wo s�av
AVENUE 52
So
3
ATTACHMENT 2
Table of Values
Tract No. 24890-6
The Citrus
Brookfield Homes
Performance
Sec urit
-
Improvement
Labor &
Current
Proposed
Warranty
Description
Materials
Security
Reduction
Security
On -Site Street & Storm Drain
Improvements
$182,810
�$65,962
$182,810
80%
$36,562
_ yµ$13,192
Water
$65,962
*
80%
Sewer
_ $53,2218
$53,22.8
*..
_._ . 80% ....__..
_. _
$10,646
Monumentation
$0
$9,850
100%
Total
1 $302,000
$311,850
$60,400
*Based upon a previous 50% reduction of securities an 80% reduction of the
remaining securities represents a 90% reduction of the overall original amounts. Staff
recommends the release of Performance securities immediately as warranty securities
have been received. Release labor and materials securities 90 days from the date of
acceptance (March 15, 2004). Release warranty securities one year from the date of
acceptance (December 19, 2004).
4 8i
TAPWDEPT\COTJNM\2003\12-16-03\C 4 Att2.doc
4 a Cr" Qaw rCV
AGENDA CATEGORY:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003 BUSINESS SESSION:
ITEM TITLE:
CONSENT CALENDAR: S
Adoption of Facility Use Policies STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Facility Use Policies as presented.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None for this action.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
At the August 19, 2003 City Council meeting, the City Council approved the
Facility Use Policies and directed staff to provide a concise and easily understood
fee chart for public use.
Staff has modified the fee chart as to the wording and categories. Fee amounts
have not changed from the Policies adopted by the City Council on August 19,
2003. The language in the Facility Use Policies has also been modified to be easier
to read and comprehend.
There are two changes in the Facility Use Policies in relation to the time frame in
which staff can accept applications.
$4
In Section A (1), the time frame is proposed to be reduced from thirty (30) working
days to fifteen (15) working days in which a person can reserve a facility. Many of
the park rental requests for private birthday parties and bounce houses come in
three weeks prior to the party. The thirty working day requirement discourages
many park rentals, as that time frame requires reservations to be made six weeks in
advance. By shortening the time frame, more requests for facilities could be
accommodated.
Section A (3) states that reservations will not be accepted for events more than six
months in advance. The Community Services Department receives numerous
requests for facilities for weddings up to twelve months in advance. By
lengthening this time frame, additional reservations could be accepted.
Attachment 1 provides a redline version of the current facility use policies, as
adopted by the City Council on August 19, while Attachment 2 provides the
proposed final version of the Facility Use Policies.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt the Facility Use Policies; or
2. Do not adopt the Facility Use Policies; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
actfull submitted,
Dodie Horvit , CoNnmunity Services Director
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Redline Version of Current Facility Use Policies and Fees
2. Proposed Facility Use Policies and Fees
2
83
ATTACHMENT 1
Facility Use Policies
A. APPLICATION FOR FACILITY USE
1. The Facility Use Application shall be made in writing on the form
provided by the City of La Quinta at
least thiFty-(30} oWn"working days prior to use. All fees
and deposits are considered due at the time the application is
submitted.
Cancellation of reservations will result in a loss of 50% of rental
fee is the City is notified between 15-30 calendar days of
reservation. Cancellation of reservations less than 15 calendar
days of reservation will result in loss of 100% of FeRtal am
feel.
Reservations will be confirmed upon payment of all feesSIMEN
MW Oand copy of signed Facility Use Application.
V
2. Events in which fifty (50) people or more will be in attendance
must also apply for a Temporary Use permit through the
Community Development Department, except events using the
Senior Center only.
3. Applications will not be accepted more than e+'� ` ``i
months in advance of use, except for contiguous multi -day
rentals.
4. All Facility Use Applications are subject to approval by the
Community Services Directorld�
"•
5. Approved use is non-tranferrable. The person signing the
Facility Use Permit is responsible for the conduct of all
participants and fully responsible for any damage caused by
use.
7. The person signing the Facility Use Permit must be 21 or older.
8. Reserved times must include set up and clean up time.
9. All laws and City ordinances must be followed.
10. The City of La Quinta reserves the right to full access to all 84
o y g
- 3
activities at any time in order to ensure that all rules,
regulations, and laws are being observed, and if necessary may
terminate an activity for the safety and welfare of City property.
11. Renters refusing to adhere to policies will be forced to leave the
premise after one (1) verbal warning issued by staff to the
signer of the Facility Use Permit. The signer of the Facility Use
Permit must be on the premises during the hours of the event.
':3Grj
12. The City of La Quinta assumes no liability for any injury,
damage, theft or loss of property belonging to others, before,
during or after usage.
13. No animals except those used for disability assistance allowed
in any City facility.
14. All teenage groups must be accompanied by responsible adult
chaperones including the signer of the Facility Use Permit, with
a ratio of two (2) adults for the first twenty (20) juveniles and
one (1) adult for each group of twenty (20) juveniles or part
thereof. Chaperones must stay with the group at all times.
B. PRIVATE PARTIES
The following will apply for use of City facilities for private parties
with inflatable amenities:
a- Private parties
2. Facilities available for private parties with inflatable amenities
are limited to Fritz Burns Park and the Gemmw 44"
Park.
3. Rental of inflatable amenities is limited to companies on the
approved list by the City of La Quinta.
4. All walkways and areas not specifically designated by the City
of La Quinta as being included in the reserved areas will be open
and available to the general public.
5. Use of the Civic Center Amphitheater and/or Gazebo requires
rental of the La Quinta Senior Center for the same period,
4
may be limited to restroom use only.
C. REASONS FOR DENYING APPLICATION
The Community Services Director may deny an application for the
following reasons:
1. Applicant's violation of the conditions of Facility Use permits
(current or prior permit).
2. Applicant's violation of the City's rules and regulations relating
to the use of facilities.
3. Failure to cooperate with City staff.
4. Previous incidents where Facility Use resulted in damage to City
property.
5. The use proposed is not consistent with the recreational, civic,
assembly or other purposes for which the particular facility has
been approved.
D. RENTAL RATE CLASSIFICATIONS
Rental rates of the City Parks and Recreation facilities are
CCr'I IQITV /r`1 C A EAN AI 1 U - ID
E. DEPOSIT$
The GeeWityQeaning. Deposit] is ,a h due with the Facility Use
Application. The Deposits will be refunded within five (5) working days
after the event, except under the following conditions:
1. Upon arrival, renter will complete a walk-through with staff.
Any damage or uncleanliness must be brought to staff's
attention at this time. At the conclusion of the event, staff will
walk through the facility with renter and document any damage
or uncleanliness. The security deposit will be released upon
written report by staff to City administration.
2. Damage to the facility while premises are under responsibility of
user. Cost of repairs as determined by the Community Services
Director will be retained by the City and deducted from the
deposit. If cost of damages exceeds amount available from
deposit, user shall remit balance of cost to City upon receipt of 8 v
invoice.
3. Vehicles are not allowed to be driven on areas that are not
specifically designated for vehicular traffic. Damage caused by
this action will be deducted from the deposit.
F. LIABILITY
All persons receiving a Facility Use Permit must agree in writing to
hold the City of La Quinta harmless and indemnify City of La Quinta from
any and all liability for injury to persons or property occurring as the
result of the activity sponsored by the permittee, and said person shall be
liable to the City of La Quinta for any and all damages to parks,
equipment, and buildings owned or controlled by City which result from
the activity of the permittee or is caused by any participant in said
activity.
A person exercising any of the privileges authorized by this policy
does so at his/her own risk without liability on the part of the City of La
Quinta for any injury to persons or property resulting therefrom.
All activities kiyelying. aH kiflatable amenity must provide the City
of La Quinta with a Certificate of Insurance naming the City of La Quinta
as additionally insured. Policy limit is $1,000,000 minimum of combined
sin4le limits. M. ,... 3..f
G. USER CLEAN-UP RESPONSIBILITY
The rental user of the facility shall be responsible for the following clean
up upon completion of rental use:
1. Deposit all bottles, cans, cups, cigarettes and paper< in proper
receptacles and deposit trash in nearby dumpster area &rt
.., a.60WAINISS
���5 ?, a. ,..R?.5.
1 . Mop up any liquid spilled on floor.
2. Leave kitchen or concession stand and all equipment in a clean,
�x x �
sanitary and < �,<� ' condition.
3. Remove any decorations (deposit in proper trash receptacle or �1y
remove from premises).
4. All groups are responsible for setting -up and taking -down chairs
and tables, and f- f clean up of facility and the immediate area.
5. Equipment from City facilities is not allowed to be taken
outdoors.
H. FOOD OR BEVERAGE
No food or beverage may be sold or served at any event unless
specified on the Facility Use permit.
Barbecuing is allowed in City provided barbecues only, except in
the case of a City sponsored event and approved by the City Council.
I. ENDING TIME OF ALL EVENTS
All events held in Parks and Recreation facilities must be
completed by 10:00 p.m. Ballfield lights are not available after 10:00
p.m.
Use of the Senior Center is limited to 1 1:00 p.m.
J. CLEARANCES, LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES
Users may be required to secure any or all of the following
clearances, licenses and/or certificates before the Facility Use Permit
Application is approved.
1. Dance permit or business license (granted by the City of La Quinta
Business License Division).
2. Police clearance (granted by the Riverside County Sheriff's
Department).
Q a Special daily beer or liquor license (issued by the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Office in San Bernardino, California;,:
" Pi:�ry �...:v.`.fyn::Cire,• .,,�,vV7 F8
9:C: i
4. Certificate or proof of insurance naming the City of La Quinta as
additionally insured.
5. Events with alcohol must pay for the mandatory cleaning service after the
event. This does not relieve the renter of leaving the facility clean so that
the cleaning service may clean the floors.
K. DECORATIONS
The following requirements shall be met: 88
1. Decorations may not be fastened to light fixtures, tables, chairs, stage or
other City property.
3. Glitter, birdseed, rice or other like items are not allowed.
4. Only masking tape may be used. No scotch tape, thumb tacks, staples,
etc. will be permitted. All decorations must be removed at the end of the
event.
5. No open flame, barbecues or other cooking devices will be permitted in
the facilities unless otherwise provided by the City.
L. PUBLICITY
Publicity for any event held at any Parks and Recreation facility may not
be released until final approval of the Facility Use Application. Signage will be
in accordance with Chapter 9.60.170 of the La Quinta Municipal Code.
M. SMOKING
Smoking is not permitted in any City building.
O. ALCOHOL AND/OR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT
1. Security guard service is required for events with live entertainment
and/or alcohol being served. For groups of 100 or less, one (1) guard
is required. For groups of 101 or more, two (2) guards are required.
2. Teen parties are required to have (2) guards for groups of 100 or less,
and four (4) guards for groups of 101 or more.
3. Guard service will be arranged for by the Community Services
Department once the fees have been paid by the renting party.
4. All permits must be presented to the Community Services Department
two weeks prior to the event, or deposit will be forfeited.
6. Alcohol is limited to beer, wine and champagne only.
7. Parties refusing to adhere to the alcohol policy will be shut down after
one (1) verbal warning. 89
f
ATTACHMENT 2
Facility Use Policies
A. APPLICATION FOR FACILITY USE
1. The Facility Use Application shall be made in writing on the form
provided by the City of La Quinta and all applicable fees paid at
least fifteen (15) working days prior to use. All fees and deposits
are considered due at the time the application is submitted.
Cancellation of reservations will result in a loss of 50% of rental
fee is the City is notified between 15-30 calendar days of
reservation. Cancellation of reservations less than 15 calendar
days of reservation will result in loss of 100% of deposit fees.
Reservations will be confirmed upon payment of all fees and
deposits and copy of signed Facility Use Application.
2. Events in which fifty (50) people or more will be in attendance
must also apply for a Temporary Use permit through the
Community Development Department, except events using the
Senior Center only.
3. Applications will not be accepted more than twelve (12) months
in advance of use, except for contiguous multi -day rentals.
4. All Facility Use Applications are subject to approval by the
Community Services Director or designee.
5. Approved use is non-tranferrable. The person signing the
Facility Use Permit is responsible for the conduct of all
participants and fully responsible for any damage caused by use.
7. The person signing the Facility Use Permit must be 21 or older.
8. Reserved times must include set up and clean up time.
9. All laws and City ordinances must be followed.
10. The City of La Quinta reserves the right to full access to all
activities at any time in order to ensure that all rules,
regulations, and laws are being observed, and if necessary may
terminate an activity for the safety and welfare of City property. 190
9
1 1. Renters refusing to adhere to policies will be forced to leave the
premise after one (1) verbal warning issued by staff to the
signer of the Facility Use Permit. The signer of the Facility Use
Permit must be on the premises during the hours of the event.
12. The City of La Quinta assumes no liability for any injury,
damage, theft or loss of property belonging to others, before,
during or after usage.
13. No animals except those used for disability assistance allowed
in any City facility.
14. All teenage groups must be accompanied by responsible adult
chaperones including the signer of the Facility Use Permit, with
a ratio of two (2) adults for the first twenty (20) juveniles and
one (1) adult for each group of twenty (20) juveniles or part
thereof. Chaperones must stay with the group at all times.
B. PRIVATE PARTIES
The following will apply for use of City facilities for private parties
and private parties with inflatable amenities:
1. Private parties may rent facilities in four hour increments.
2. Facilities available for private parties with inflatable amenities
are limited to Fritz Burns Park and the La Quinta Park.
3. Rental of inflatable amenities is limited to companies on the
approved list by the City of La Quinta.
4. All walkways and areas not specifically designated by the City
of La Quinta as being included in the reserved areas will be open
and available to the general public.
5. Use of the Civic Center Amphitheater and/or Gazebo requires
rental of the La Quinta Senior Center for the same period, rental
may be limited to restroom use only.
C. REASONS FOR DENYING APPLICATION
The Community Services Director may deny an application for the
following reasons:
1. Applicant's violation of the conditions of Facility Use permits
(current or prior permit).
2. Applicant's violation of the City's rules and regulations relating
to the use of facilities.
3. Failure to cooperate with City staff.
4. Previous incidents where Facility Use resulted in damage to City
property.
5. The use proposed is not consistent with the recreational, civic,
assembly or other purposes for which the particular facility has
been approved.
D. RENTAL RATE CLASSIFICATIONS
Rental rates of the City Parks and Recreation facilities are
classified as Class I -IV along with the Fee Schedule for each
classification. The City of La Quinta has first priority to facilities,
second priority is given to La Quinta residents. All other requests will
follow in priority of use per the Fee Schedule.
E. DEPOSITS
Deposits are due with the Facility Use Application. Deposits will
be refunded within five (5) working days after the event, except under
the following conditions:
1. Upon arrival, renter will complete a walk-through with staff.
Any damage or uncleanliness must be brought to staff's
attention at this time. At the conclusion of the event, staff will
walk through the facility with renter and document any damage
or uncleanliness. The security deposit will be released upon
written report by staff to City administration.
2. Damage to the facility while premises are under responsibility of
user. Cost of repairs as determined by the Community Services
Director will be retained by the City and deducted from the
deposit. If cost of damages exceeds amount available from
deposit, user shall remit balance of cost to City upon receipt of
invoice.
3. Vehicles are not allowed to be driven on areas that are not
specifically designated for vehicular traffic. Damage caused by
this action will be deducted from the deposit.
F. LIABILITY
All persons receiving a Facility Use Permit must agree in writing to
hold the City of La Quinta harmless and indemnify City of La Quinta from ��
any and all liability for injury to persons or property occurring as the
result of the activity sponsored by the permittee, and said person shall be
liable to the City of La Quinta for any and all damages to parks,
equipment, and buildings owned or controlled by City which result from
the activity of the permittee or is caused by any participant in said
activity.
A person exercising any of the privileges authorized by this policy
does so at his/her own risk without liability on the part of the City of La
Quinta for any injury to persons or property resulting therefrom.
All activities must provide the City of La Quinta with a Certificate
of Insurance naming the City of La Quinta as additionally insured. Policy
limit is $1,000,000 minimum of combined single limits. Insured's name
must be the same as the renting party on the Facility Use Application.
Event insurance can be purchased through the City of La Quinta in
lieu of individual insurance statements. Fees for insurance must be paid
at the time of Application submittal. Insurance fees vary, depending on
the event purpose, length of rental, event attendance and food and
alcohol issues.
G. USER CLEAN-UP RESPONSIBILITY
The rental user of the facility shall be responsible for the following clean
up upon completion of rental use:
1. Deposit all bottles, cans, cups, cigarettes and paper in proper
receptacles and deposit trash in nearby dumpster area. This includes
cigarette debris from outside the facility.
1. Mop up any liquid spilled on floor.
2. Leave kitchen or concession stand and all equipment in a clean,
sanitary and proper working condition.
3. Remove any decorations (deposit in proper trash receptacle or
remove from premises).
4. All groups are responsible for setting -up and taking -down chairs
and tables, and clean up of facility and the immediate area.
5. Equipment from City facilities is not allowed to be taken
outdoors.
H. FOOD OR BEVERAGE
No food or beverage may be sold or served at any event unless (9 3
specified on the Facility Use permit.
Barbecuing is allowed in City provided barbecues only, except in
the case of a City sponsored event and approved by the City Council.
I. ENDING TIME OF ALL EVENTS
All events held in Parks and Recreation facilities must be
completed by 10:00 p.m. Ballfield lights are not available after 10:00
p.m.
Use of the Senior Center is limited to 1 1:00 p.m.
J. CLEARANCES, LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES
Users may be required to secure any or all of the following
clearances, licenses and/or certificates before the Facility Use Permit
Application is approved.
1. Dance permit or business license (granted by the City of La Quinta
Business License Division).
2. Police clearance (granted by the Riverside County Sheriff's
Department) .
3. Special daily beer or liquor license (issued by the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Office in San Bernardino, California) if alcohol is to be sold on
the premises.
4. Certificate or proof of insurance naming the City of La Quinta as
additionally insured.
5. Events with alcohol must pay for the mandatory cleaning service after the
event. This does not relieve the renter of leaving the facility clean so that
the cleaning service may clean the floors.
K. DECORATIONS
The following requirements shall be met:
1. Decorations may not be fastened to light fixtures, tables, chairs, stage or
other City property.
2. Glitter, birdseed, rice or other like items are not allowed.
3. Only masking tape may be used. No scotch tape, thumb tacks, staples,
etc. will be permitted. All decorations must be removed at the end of the
event. 94
4. No open flame, barbecues or other cooking devices will be permitted in
the facilities unless otherwise provided by the City.
L. PUBLICITY
Publicity for any event held at any Parks and Recreation facility may not
be released until final approval of the Facility Use Application. Signage will be in
accordance with Chapter 9.60.170 of the La Quinta Municipal Code.
M. SMOKING
Smoking is not permitted in any City building.
0. ALCOHOL AND/OR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT
1. Security guard service is required for events with live entertainment
and/or alcohol being served. For groups of 100 or less, one (1) guard
is required. For groups of 101 or more, two (2) guards are required.
2. Teen parties are required to have (2) guards for groups of 100 or less,
and four (4) guards for groups of 101 or more.
3. Guard service will be arranged for by the Community Services
Department once the fees have been paid by the renting party.
4. All permits must be presented to the Community Services Department
two weeks prior to the event, or deposit will be forfeited.
5. Alcohol is limited to beer, wine and champagne only.
6. Parties refusing to adhere to the alcohol policy will be shut down after
one (1) verbal warning.
7. Parties serving alcohol must pay to have the facility professionally
cleaned after the event. Fees will be paid at the time of application.
CITY OF LA QUINTA
FACILITY USE FEE SCHEDULE
CLASSIFICATION OF GROUPS
Class I: La Quinta youth (18 and under), 501(c)3 recreation organizations
Class II: La Quinta non-profit organizations and community -based organizations, Desert Sands Unified School District
(DSUSD Sports Complex Use Only)
Class III: La Quinta residents and DSUSD (for all other facilities)
Class IV: La Quinta business and profit organizations, non city residents, organizations, and businesses.
TEM
CLASS I
CLASS II
CLASS III
CLASS IV
Civic Center Campus,
Amphitheater, Gazebo,
Cove Oasis Trailhead
$50 per hour
$75 per hour
$100 per hour
$150 per hour
Senior Center
Multipurpose Room
$55 per hour
$75 per hour
$90 per hour
$100 per hour
Senior Center Kitchen
$10 per hour
$20 per hour
$25 per hour
$30 per hour
Senior Center Restroom Use Only
$20 per hour
$25 per hour
$30 per hour
$30 per hour
Senior Center Cleaning Mandatory
for parties serving alcohol
$150
$150
$150
$150
Senior Center Set Up/Cleaning Fee
$90/150
$90/150
$90/150
$90/150
* *Insurance Coverage
(rental events var )
$75- $125
per day
$75- $125
per day
$75- $125
per day
$75- $125
per day
Tennis Court
N/C
$ 5.00 hr
$ 5.00 hr
$ 10.00 hr
Fritz Burns or La Quinta Park
Party/Inflatable Amenities
$50 (4 hours)
$50 (4 hours)
$50 (4 hours)
$50 (4 hours)
*Baseball Diamond
N/C
$ 5.00 hr
$ 15.00 hr
$ 25.00 hr
*Soccer Field
N/C
$ 5.00 hr
$ 20.00 hr
$ 30.00 hr
Snack Bar
N/C
$ 10.00 hr
$ 15.00 hr
$ 20.00 hr
*Field Lights
N/C
$ 15.00 hr
$ 20.00 hr
$ 25.00 hr
Announcing System
$ 5.00 flat
$ 10.00 flat
$ 15.00 flat
$ 20.00 flat
Diamond Preparation
$ 24.00 hr
$ 24.00 hr
$ 30.00 hr
$ 30.00 hr
Bases
$10 per day
$10 per day
$20 per day
$40 per day
*Per field * * Rental parties can use personal insurance agencies for coverage naming the City of La Quinta as insured.
Deposits (refundable upon post conditions of use)
Item
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Civic Center Campus,
Amphitheater, Gazebo,
Cove Oasis Trailhead
$100
$100
$100
$100
Senior Center
$300
$300
$300
$300
Park Party Rentals
$50 per 4 hrs.
$50 per 4 hrs.
$50 per 4 hrs.
$50 per 4 hrs.
Sports Field Deposit
$ 500
$ 500
$ 500
$ 500
Snack Bar Deposit
$350
$350
$500
$500
Restroom Keys
$100
$100
$100
$100
Base Use Deposit
$150
$150
$150
$150
96
GAWINWORD\Fees.NEW..doc r J
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution of the City
Council Supporting the Desert Community College
District's Bond Campaign and Bond Measure
Scheduled for the March 2, 2004 Consolidated
Election
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting the Desert Community College
District's bond campaign and bond measure scheduled for the March 2, 2004
consolidated election.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The City of La Quinta is a part of the College of the Desert ("COD") Assessment
District. Dr. Rick Post of COD spoke briefly at the December 2, 2003 Council
meeting and asked for the City's endorsement and support of the upcoming bond
campaign.
COD believes the bond measure is necessary because there are not enough state
funds to pay for the necessary refurbishing and infrastructure upgrades. Since
student population at COD is expected to double in the next 10-15 years, the bond
measure would enable COD to provide more classroom space for larger lectures,
continued access to modern technology and expanded college programs to meet
the needs of students, faculty and staff.
The Assessment District's Board of Trustees proposes to provide additional funding
by means of a $346.5 million general obligation bond to be placed on the March 2,
2004 consolidated election ballot.
Should the City Council choose to support the Desert Community College District's
bond measure, a copy of the Resolution will be forwarded to COD for inclusion on
their list of supporting organizations.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting the Desert Community
College District's bond campaign and bond measure scheduled for the March
2, 2004 consolidated election; or
2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting the Desert
Community College District's bond campaign and bond measure scheduled
for the March 2, 2004 consolidated election; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Terry De ringer, Management Assistant
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
93
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE DESERT
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT'S BOND CAMPAIGN
AND BOND MEASURE SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 2,
2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta has determined
that the Desert Community College District (the District) needs to acquire,
construct, improve and equip certain properties and equipment within the
District in order to enable the District to maintain College of the Desert as a
valuable community resource, to train and re-train local residents for higher -
paying and skilled jobs, particularly nurses and public safety personnel, and
to enhance the educational opportunities of the students in the District who
desire to transfer to four-year colleges and universities; and
WHEREAS, due to the rapid growth of the District's service area,
including the eastern and western Coachella Valley, thousands of new
students are entering college each year and College of the Desert desires to
respond to such growth by expanding its campuses and constructing new
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the District, in collaboration with staff and community, has
prepared a Facilities Master Plan which outlines the District's facility needs
through 2015; and
WHEREAS, in the judgment of the District's Board of Trustees, it is
advisable to provided additional funding for such facility, technology and
safety needs by means of a $346.5 million general obligation bond to be
place don the March 2, 2004 consolidated election ballot; and
WHEREAS, the District and the College of the Desert administration
have demonstrated responsible stewardship in the allocation and use of
funds received from the federal and state government and private donors
over the past forty years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
99
Resolution No. 2003-
College of the Desert Bond Measure
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 2
The City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby resolve to
endorse and support the Desert Community College District's bond
campaign and bond measure scheduled for the March 2, 2004
consolidated election.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of December, 2003, by the
following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, CITY CLERK
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
(A
Lo. •
AGENDA CATEGORY:
OF Tt1ti
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILI"A MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
CONSENT CALENDAR: �O
ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Professional Services
Agreement with David Evans and Associates Inc. to STUDY SESSION:
Provide Professional Engineering Services for the PUBLIC HEARING:
Washington Street Median Island and Median Island
Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2003-09
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with David Evans and
Associates, Inc., (DEA) in the amount of $89,570, to prepare the plans,
specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) for the Washington Street Median
Island and Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2003-09.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The following represents the project's approved funding and funding sources:
Infrastructure Funds: $374,008
RDA Project Area No. 1 Funds: $1,040,160
Total Funding Available: $1,414,168
The following represents the approved project budget:
Construction:
Design:
Inspection/Test/Survey:
Administration:
Professional:
Contingency:
Total:
$1,047,338
$104,733
$81,169
$52,367
$23,827
$104,734
$1,414,168
As illustrated, adequate funding is available to support staff's recommendation.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
101
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\C 9.doc
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The Washington Street Median Island and Median Island Landscape Improvements,
Project No. 2003-09, is included within the Fiscal Year 2003/2004 Capital
Improvement Plan approved by the City Council on May 20, 2003.
The proposed improvements will be installed on Washington Street, between
Avenue 48 and Avenue 50. Improvements include minor widening on the east side
of the street to accommodate the proposed median curb, installing raised curb
median, landscaping, irrigation, and median lighting. The landscape palette will be
the City Council approved "desertscape" theme for primary image corridors.
On October 7, 2003, the City Council authorized staff to distribute a Request for
Proposals (RFP) to obtain professional engineering services to prepare the PS&E for
the Washington Street Median Island and Median Island Landscape Improvements,
Project No. 2003-09, and appointed a Consultant Selection Committee.
The City received five proposals from qualified engineering firms on November 3,
2003. Following its evaluation of the five proposals, the Consultant Selection
Committee unanimously recommends DEA be awarded a PSA, in the amount of
$89,570, to prepare the PS&E.
Contingent upon City Council approval of the PSA (Attachment 1) on December
161 2003, the following represents how the project is scheduled to proceed:
City Council Approve PSA December 16, 2003
Project Design (6 months) January - June 2004
City Council Approve PS&E/Advertise July 2004
Construction (4 months) September 2004 — December 2004
Accept Improvements January 2005
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with David Evans and
Associates, Inc., in the amount of $89,570, to prepare the plans,
specifications and engineer's estimate for the Washington Street Median
Island and Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2003-09; or
2. Do not approve a Professional Services Agreement with David Evans and
Associates, Inc., in the amount of $89,570, to prepare the plans,
specifications and engineer's estimate for the Washington Street Median
Island and Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2003-09; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
2
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Or
(Ei,4othy R. Jon so . E.
Public Works Directo /city Engineer
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Professional Services Agreement
3
C:' 3
ATTACHMENT 1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and
entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, ("City"), a California municipal
corporation, and DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Consultant"). The parties
hereto agree as follows:
1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this
Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services related to The City of La auinta
Washington Street Median Island and Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project
No. 2003-09 as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work"). Consultant warrants
that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner
in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services.
1.2 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in
accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the
City of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent
jurisdiction.
1.3 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified
herein, Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and
approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by
this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees,
assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed
by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by
this Agreement.
1.4 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants
that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it
has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions
there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and
(d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance
of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown
conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by City,
Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at
Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as
defined in Section 4.2 hereof).
1.5 Care of Work. Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of
the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work performed by Consultant,
and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or
damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until
acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by
City's own negligence. The performance of services by Consultant shall not relieve
Consultant from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work
N:\PROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project Files\PROJECTS\2003 Pdcts\2003-09 WSH Mod Mod IS Imp\DEA Contract
Files\PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page I of 9
4 . v< <�
at no. further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of
Consultant.
1.6 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, Consultant shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope
of Services when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Consultant
shall not be required to perform any additional services without compensation. Any
addition in compensation not exceeding five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum may be
approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increase must be approved by the City
Council.
1.7 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if
any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in Exhibit "D" (the "Special
Requirements"). In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special
Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special
Requirements shall govern.
2.0 COMPENSATION
2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant
shall be compensated in accordance with Exhibit "B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a
total amount not to exceed Eighty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Dollars ($89,570.00)
(the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.6. The method of compensation set
forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion,
payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, payment for time
and materials based upon Consultant's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or
such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may
include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs,
transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if
specified in the Schedule of Compensation.
2.2 Method of Payment. Any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment,
Consultant shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in
the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date
of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time
and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of
hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a
principal member of Consultant specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement. City will pay Consultant for all expenses stated
thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than the last working
day of the month.
3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall
be performed diligently and within the time period established in Exhibit "C" (the "Schedule of
Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be
approved in writing by the Contract Officer.
N:\PROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project FilesTROJEC7=003 Prjcts\2003-09 WSH Mod Mod IS Imp\DEA Contract
FilesTROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page 2 of 9) t.-
3.3 Force Maieure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for
performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of
any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence
of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires,
earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of
any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Consultant shall
within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing
of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of
delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the forced delay when
and if in his or her judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination
shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement.
3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Sections 7.7 or 7.8 of this
Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the
services, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance.
4.0 COORDINATION OF _WORK
4.1 Representative of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant are hereby
designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its
behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection
therewith:
a. Kim S. Rhodes, L.A., Vice President
b. Gene T. Ginther, P.E., P.L.S.
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of
the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for
directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the
services hereunder.
The foregoing principals may not be changed by Consultant and no other personnel may
be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of
City.
4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Steve Speer, P.E., Assistant City
Engineer or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of City. It shall be
Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress
of the performance of the services and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be
made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City
required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer.
4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge,
capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial
inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement,
Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services
required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this
Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or .by operation
of law, without the prior written approval of City.
N:\PROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project Files\PROJECTS\2003 Prjcts\2003-09 WSH Mod Mod IS Imp\DEA Contract Files\PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page 3 of 9
6 �:'
4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any
control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees,
perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Consultant shall perform
all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as
to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that
role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or
employees are agents or employees of City.
4.5 City Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with any plans, publications,
reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed
hereunder which are reasonably available to Consultant only from or through action by City.
5.0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS.
5.1 Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit
concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, personal and public liability and property
damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property
resulting from Consultant's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Consultant's
performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest
clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's
performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any
such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and
employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to
commencement of the services hereunder.
The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in
accordance with the following table:
Contract Sum Personal Injury/Property Damage Coverage
Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence
$50,000 - $300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence
Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence
Consultant shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against
all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any
automobile by Consultant, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by
Consultant, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable,
arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this
Agreement. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer
or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall
contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses
arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be
required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and
its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior
to commencement of the services hereunder.
Consultant shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's
Compensation laws.
Consultant shall procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in an amount
acceptable to City.
N-TROJEC'MCLQ T Drive Project Files\PROJECTS\2003 Prjcts\2003-09 WSH Mod Mod IS Imp\DEA Contract Files\PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page 4 of 9
7 +, ;�
All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement
and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days written notice to City of proposed
cancellation. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates
evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to
indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents.
5.2 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its
officers, employees, representatives and agents ("Indemnified Parties'), from and against those
actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs
and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including
property owned by City) and for errors and omissions committed by Consultant, its officers,
employees and agents, which arise out of Consultant's negligent performance under this
Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own negligence or
that of its officers or employees. In the event the Indemnified Parties are made a party to any
action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding in any way involving such claims, Consultant
shall provide a defense to the Indemnified Parties, or at the City's option, reimburse the
Indemnified Parties their costs of defense, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in
defense of such claim. In addition, Consultant shall be obligated to promptly pay any final
judgment or portion thereof rendered against the Indemnified Parties.
5.3 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to
provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the
time herein required, City may, at its sole option: .
a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for
such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement.
b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any
payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant
demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof.
C. Terminate this Agreement.
Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies
City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Consultant's failure to
maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be
construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for
payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractors'
performance of work under this Agreement.
6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS.
6.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer
such reports concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement
as the Contract Officer shall require.
6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to
perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate
the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be
kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The Contract
Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times,
including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records.
N:\PROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project Files\PROJECTS\2003 Prjcts\2003-09 WSH Mod Mod IS Imp\DEA Contract Files\PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page 5 of 9
8 -� U
6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports,
records, documents and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are
prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this
Agreement, shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon termination of this
Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Consultant shall have no
claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of
its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant shall cause
all subcontractors to assign to City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the
event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all
damages suffered thereby.
In the event City or any person, firm or corporation authorized by City reuses said
documents and materials without written verification or adaptation by Consultant for the
specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said
documents and materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Consultant from
liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the completion
of this Contract and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect.
6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents
and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this
Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract
Officer or as required by law. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any
information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City.
7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT.
7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to
validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of
California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to
this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of
California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees
to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.
7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured
party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor.
The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring
party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and
completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or
such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is
an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, City may take such immediate
action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this section shall be a
condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and
such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that
the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this
Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8.
7.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Consultant
sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably
believes were suffered by City due to the default of Consultant in the performance of the
services required by this Agreement.
N:\PROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project Files\PROJECTS\2003 Prjcts\2003-09 WSH Mod Mod IS Imp\DEA Contract FilesTROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMEW.doc
Page 6 of 9
9 1 9
7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non
defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
City's consent or approval of any act by Consultant requiring City's consent or approval shall
not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent
act of Consultant. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not
be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies
expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are
cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not
preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for
the same default or any other default by the other party.
7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take
legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for
any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to
obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.
7.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This section shall govern any termination
of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.8 for termination
for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without
cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of any notice of
termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be
specifically approved by the Contract. Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for
all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized
by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as
may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3.
7.8 Termination For Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of
Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the
provisions of Section 7.2, take over work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or
otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the
services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City
shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to
Consultant for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City as previously
stated in Section 7.3.
7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party
arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party.
8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION.
8.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be
personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or
breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or
for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of City shall have any personal interest,
direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any
decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interest of
any corporation, partnership or association in which she or he is, directly or indirectly,
NAPROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project FilesTROJECTS\2003 P4jcts\2003-09 WSH Med Med IS Iinp\DEA Contract Files\PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page 7 of 9
10
interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not
paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or general consideration for
obtaining this Agreement.
8.3 _Covenant against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its
heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no
discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race,
color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the performance of this
Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and
that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed,
religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry.
9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either
party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and
either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below.
Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in
writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing
if mailed as provided in this section.
To City:
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Attention: Thomas P. Genovese
City Manager
78-495 Calle Tampico
P.O. Box 1504
La Quinta, California 92253
To Consultant:
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
Attention: Kim S. Rhodes, L.A.
Vice President
77-682 Country Club Drive, Suite F2
Palm Desert, CA 92211
9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the
parties and all previous understanding, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and
superseded by this Agreement.
9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent
of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties.
9.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses,
paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable
by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs,
or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted
to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder.
9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto
warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and
that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of
this Agreement.
NAPROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project Files\PROJECfS\2003 Prjcts\2003-09 WSH Mod Mod IS Imp\DEA Contract Files\PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page 8 of 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated
below.
CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date:
ATTEST:
June Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT: David Evans and Associates, Inc.
i
Name: Kim S. Rhodes, L.A.
Title: Vice President
Date: / )L- - 3 - D .3
N:\PROJECTS\CLQ T Drive Project FilesTROJECfS\2003 PrjcW003-09 WSH Mod Mod LS Imp\DEA Contract Files\PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT.doc
Page 9 of 9 114,
12
Exhibit A
Scope of Services
The project consists of engineering and design of the Washington Street Median Islands and
Median Island Landscape Improvements between Avenue 48 and Avenue 50. Improvements
include minor widening on the east side of the street to accommodate the proposed median
curb, installation of raised curb median, installation of landscape and irrigation, and median
lighting. The Scope of Services to be performed by David Evans and Associates, Inc., dated
December 3, 2003 is attached and made a part hereof.
13 113
Section 3: Scope of Work Program
Task 1— Pre Design Meeting
The DEA project team shall attend a start up meeting with City staff to
discuss the design intent, including median layout, access and curb/gutter
improvements. This meeting shall provide a thorough review of the scope
of services, deliverables, and progress reviews. DEA will also review the
proposed plant palette, street improvement work, and demolition items.
Because DEA was responsible for the design and implementation of the
remaining portions of Washington Street, we feel confident that we
understand the goals and objectives necessary for the success of the
project.
Deliverables: One start up meeting.
Task 2 — Field Survey
A. Record Data Research
• DEA will secure available record information such as surveys of record, assessor's parcel maps, street record
drawings, utility record information, centerline ties, benchmarks, and similar data within the project limits.
B. Topographic Survey
• DEA will establish temporary site control for the topographic survey.
• DEA will provide street cross sections along Washington Street (curb to curb) at selected intervals and will
locate and identify above ground utilities not shown on the .topographic map.
• DEA will prepare a topographic base map for the site to include field data collected topographic information,
calculated street centerlines and street right-of-way within the project limits.
C. LANDNET
• DEA will provide a calculated street centerline and street right-of-way derived from available public record
information.
Not a hart of this proposal
• Record of Survey
• Corner Records
• Establishment of property comers
• Boundary Surveys
• Underground utility locations
• Pothole locations (because Washington Street is a recently constructed street, DEA has assumed that existing
record mapping will provide needed utility locations and therefore has not included pricing for potholing.
Should the need arise for potholing, DEA will prepare a fee amendment and secure city approval prior to
doing so.
Deliverables: Topographic Map I "=40' scale with 1 ' contours provided in an AutoCAD 2000 drawing format.
Task 3 — Project Area Base Maps
DEA shall prepare project area base maps for the Washington Street Median Improvement Project. These plans
shall be developed from DEA survey data compiled in Task 2. The team shall also perform a physical assessment
14
14
of the project area to determine the placement of elements which impact the overall design. Plans shall be
prepared at a scale of 1" = 20'.
Deliverables: Project area base maps @ 1 "=20'.
Task 4 — Data Collection /Agency Coordination
DEA shall obtain pertinent infrastructure data such as water and power points of connection and water pressure
data. Coordination with CVWD is included herewith in order to obtain project approval. DEA requests that the
city provide potholing in order to determine the street section. Soil samples will then be provided to Soil and
Plant Laboratories for analysis to ensure successful plant establishment.
Deliverables: Project coordination and data collection as noted. City to provide pothole data from prior
construction projects in the area.
Task 5 —Preliminary Geometric Layout / Conceptual Plan
The DEA team will prepare a preliminary conceptual plan indicating the geometric layout of the proposed
medians throughout the limits of the project. Areas requiring street widening will also be indicated in both plan
and profile as to fully describe the project goals. A "typical" planting layout will be shown, along with a cross
section of the planting scheme. Plant photos will be included for all proposed landscape materials. Having
designed the adjacent Washington Street median landscaping several years ago, DEA proposes to continue the
same desert palette which is consistent with the City Landscape Guidelines.
Where street work occurs, the geometric layout of traffic lanes will be shown in addition to curve and taper
information; however, signage and striping will not be provided at this time. Water and power points of
connection will be determined and shown on the conceptual plan. Utility information obtained during "Data
Collection" will be indicated for coordination purposes. A preliminary construction cost estimate will also be
provided. Optional "value engineer" items will be discussed and presented for review. Some of these will
include issues such as poured in place curb vs. extruded curb placement, and trenching vs. boring where roadway
crossings are necessary.
Deliverables: 30 "x42" Colored Conceptual Plan indicating proposed median location, street geometrics for lane
configuration, and "typical " planting scheme with plant palette photos. This task also includes two meetings with
City staff.
Task 6 —1 ' Review / Concept Review
This task includes revisions to plans prior to commencing work on the final construction drawings.
Deliverables: Modifications to plans based upon city review and agency coordination. This task includes one
meeting with City staff.
Task 7 — Street Widening and Raised Median Plan
This task includes the preparation of plan and profile sheets depicting
the proposed street widening and median improvements. Curbs will
be shown as either extruded or poured -in -place, depending upon the
results of the "value engineering" discussions described in Task 5.
Deliverables: Plan and profile sheets at a scale of 1 "=40'
horizontally and 1 "=4' vertically.
15 I Ia
Task 8 — Signing and Striping Plans
This task includes the preparation of the signing and striping plans showing necessary construction control
signing and striping and permanent signing and striping.
Deliverables: Plan sheets at a scale of 1 "=40'.
Task 9 — Planting Plan
Plans shall include a plant legend indicating trees, palms, shrubs, and ground covers, in addition to information
regarding fines and decorative rock. The legend shall indicate the botanical and common names, quantity, size,
and remarks (such as variety and staking procedure). The plans shall provide an integrated palette of material in
accordance with the city landscape guidelines for image Corridors.
Deliverables: 1 "=20'scale planting plans for new medians.
Task 10 — Irrigation Plan
The final irrigation plans will provide the necessary information for a complete and fully automatic irrigation
system for the project area. The plans will indicate the point(s) of connection based upon CVWD requirements,
backflow prevention and pressure regulation (as necessary), and equipment size and type in the irrigation legend.
Deliverables: I "=20' scale irrigation plans for new medians.
Task 11— Electrical /Lighting Plans
Dream Engineering will provide plans, specifications and engineer's estimate for median island lighting on
Washington Street from Avenue 48 to Avenue 50. Dream Engineering will coordinate with HD and prepare all
plans in accordance with the City of La Quinta Dark Sky Ordinance. The team shall perform utility coordination,
and provide technical support during the bidding and award process.
Deliverables: 1 "=20' scale electrical / lighting plans for landscape uplighting in medians only.
Task 12 — Project Specifications
DEA shall prepare project technical specifications in addition to modifying the boilerplate document provided by
the city.
Deliverables: Eight hard copy sets of specifications (2 at 4 each review sessions) and one final digital file in
Microsoft Word for Windows format.
Task 13 — 2nd Review / 85% - 90% Check Plans and Specifications
This task includes the submittal and revisions to plans based upon a 90% completion. Plans and specifications
shall be complete; however some minor detailing may still be required. This submittal will require significant
"calendar time" on behalf of the City plan check process to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the plans.
Deliverables: Submittal and revisions to plans based upon City plan check comments. This task includes one
meeting with City staff.
Task 14 — Construction Cost Estimate and Bid Schedule
The project team shall prepare a final construction cost estimate and bid schedule in a per unit basis (or lump
sum) of proposed improvements once the construction documents have been completed and approved. This
format shall directly match the contractor bid schedule for ease of comparison. The estimate shall be in tabular
form for each construction item showing quantity, unit, unit price and total cost.
16 11O
Deliverables: One construction estimate in Excel for Windows format at each project review.
Task 15 — 3rd Review / 100% Check Plans, Specifications, and Engineers Estimate
This task includes the submittal of 100% complete plans, specifications (including bid schedule) and engineer's
opinion of the probable cost of construction. A copy of the DEA QA/QC check set can also be provided to ensure
the City receives plans that have been reviewed by the project manager and principal in charge.
Deliverables: Submittal and revisions to plans based upon City plan check comments. This task includes one
meeting with City staff.
Task 16 — 4t" Review /Preliminary Final (Screen Check)
Although DEA does not anticipate any further corrections during this phase of the work, this task can address
outstanding issues / comments required from the city or governing agency. This task includes the submittal and
routing of final mylar plans for signature by CVWD, LID, and the City.
Deliverables: Submittal and revisions to plans based upon City plan check comments (if required) and the
submittal and routing of final mylar plans, and specifications.
Task 17 —Assistance During Bidding
The DEA team shall assist the City during the bid process which shall
include responding to questions from prospective bidders and
coordination with the city staff related to the project bid advertisement.
This task shall also include the attendance at the pre -bid meeting to
present information regarding the construction documents. The pre bid
meeting will include a site visit.
Deliverables: Attendance at a pre -bid meeting. DEA shall also
provide bid assistance as noted above.
17 1 1.-,v
Exhibit B
Schedule of Compensation
Payment shall be on a "Fixed Fee" basis in accordance with the Consultants Schedule of
Compensation attached herewith for the work tasks performed in conformance with Section
2.2 of the Agreement. Total compensation for all work under this contract shall not exceed
Eighty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Dollars ($89,570.00) except as specified in
Section 1.6 - Additional Services of the Agreement.
18 113
CITY OF LA QUINTA
COST PROPOSAL SHEET
WASHINGTON STREET MEDIAN ISLAND AND MEDIAN ISLAND
LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS
The following is a summary of costs to provide the services outlined in the Request for
Proposals for professional engineering consultants to prepare the PS&E for the Washington
Street Improvements and will be used as the basis for negotiating a Professional Services
Agreement:
Work Objectives
Proposed Cost
1.
Pre -Design Meeting
$
720.00
2.
Field Survey
$
9,720.00
3.
Project Area Base Maps
$
3,570.00
4.
Data Collection / Agency Coordination
$
2,190.00
5.
Preliminary Geometric La out / Conceptual Plans
$109420.00
6.
1 Review / Concept Review
$
6,540.00
7.
Street Widening and Raised Median Plan
$
49160.00
8.
Signing and StripingPlans
$
3,120.00
9.
Planting Plan
$
9,900.00
10.
Irrigation Plan
$11,140.00
11.
Electrical / Lighting Plans
$
4,500.00
12.
Project S ecifications
$
5,120.00
13.
2na Review / 85% - 90% Check Plans and Specifications
$
6,640.00
14.
Construction Cost Estimate and Bid Schedule
$
4,670.00
15.
3ra Review / 100% Check Plans, Specs. & Engineers Estimate
$
2,680.00
16.
4n Review / Preliminary Final Screen Check
$
1,680.00
17.
Assistance During Bidding
$
29800.00
TOTAL LUMP SUM FIXED FEE:
1$89,570.00
Consultant may include as many, or as few, work objective it believes are necessary to
complete the project.
Attached herein is a detailed man-hour and fee breakdown for the tasks and sub -tasks
defined in our proposal. Included within our detailed man-hour and fee breakdown is our
anticipated reimbursable budget in the amount of $4,150.00. Reimbursable expenses
include: printing, delivery costs, postage, etc. Reimbursable expenses shall be charged at
cost plus 10%.
�14e� .'J. geA::e�
Prime Consultant
/�--3-63
Date Signed
19 1
0
0
0
0
0
Ln
o
0
0
0
o
O
0
O
o
0
0
o
•
.-
N
c0.
N
N
N
e-
r'
N
N
N
N
O
•
69
if?
69
69
6p9
61�
69
101,
IvIll
69
1419,11
140
69
69
69
69
69
69
N
co
N
N
N
N
o
O
N
3
�O
co
co
co
cco
co
O
Go
•
cp
.
Goo
N
cM
��
N
v
O
cD
st
�
C6
0
Ili
N
T-
N
6H
b9
69
69
6N
69
69
69
0)
if!
lG,*l
IG&
1601
69
69
10
69
69
69
69
f
a
co
d
co
N
v
•
.
N
T"
N
V-
s
*
N
O
oD
O
c0
cN
co
r •
co
O
co
0�
�
•V
eq
O
v
•
co
co
co
cNr1
N
•
•
N
(r0
co
co
00
CD
coco
coco
Co
i
w ►
e
•
�
•
N
d
v
co
co
co
d'
�
v
c0
co
Co
v
OO
•i
N
N
d
I
I
I
N
N
ilti
v
•
•
V
N
1.1.cq
GO
�
et
co
N
oo
d
Go
co
N
►
N
a
N
C
4
v
z
•
�
�
m
cca
.�
U
•
7
to
C
e
0
ea
o
o
C
D
'v
)
e�
m
i
cl
m
o•
c
U
W
cn
�c
vi
'
$
$
.r
3
m
L
m
o
a
C
•
m
r
m�
U
'>
O
h
vJ
C
to
C
C
U
e
Y
C)
LL
C
•.
E
Z
s
o
J
cv
m
co
o
E
s
o
cN
_
LL
a
a
o
�,
w
U�
E
m
••
m
0
Q
d
C
C
W
C
C
cep'
8
e-
of
O
ag
p
WCM
.`
O
d
�O
m
�a
m
�
m
ci
•C
�-
c
t
`
COg
O�
''
m
a
C
o
C
®
o
E
EU
m
C�
3
a
a
o
a
c
3
E
3
8
'e
Z
3
ri
�°
`�°
°�
__
c
m
'>
3
a
c
`�
c�
'>
"0
W
9
m
w
m
m
c
c
'�
w
'y
�
i(
O
O
y
O
c
O
e
m
'C
cco
,E
m
C
C
'0
0
a`
iioan.�
p
L
L
m
L
a
m
a
co
to
a
W
a
N
Q
cam._
`1
Q
N
M
et
to
0
f-
C0
0
O�
V-
T-
� t,9
�
�
C
Y
w
Y
0
Y
V�
Y
tll
Y
M
Y
to
Y
N
Y
N
Y
H
Y
N
Y
N
Y
fA
Y
(a
o
Y
M
Y
N 'p
W
o
Y
0cc
Je
to
I
1-
1-
01
F-
�-
F-
�-
co
F-
F-
H
I--
0 00 o
0 0, o
d ti co
M € O
OI e-
E9 M fsrtq 69
s:
C
0. 0
[ m
3 c O
< o
20
Exhibit C
Schedule of Performance
The Consultants project schedule is attached and made a part of this agreement.
21-
m
Q
J
�r-
a
A'
u
�1
O
CL
W
Q
L-
CL
E
u
.t!
cc
tCi
c�v
i
CD
S..
•a+
0
-i-+
cm
_c
cu
9
0
Exhibit D
Special Requirements
None.
i. 6:
23
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003 AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
ITEM TITLE: Denial of Claim for Damages Filed By CONSENT CALENDAR:
Bertha Sanchez — Date of Loss: November 16, 2003
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Deny the Claim for Damages filed by Bertha Sanchez, with a reported date of loss
of November 16, 2003.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The total amount of the claim was $305.00.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
A claim was filed by Bertha Sanchez with a reported date of loss of November 16,
2003 (Attachment 1). It was forwarded to Carl Warren & Co., the City's claims
administrator. Carl Warren & Co. has reviewed the matter and recommends that the
City Council deny the claim.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
I""
1. Deny the Claim for Damages filed by Bertha Sanchez with a reported date of
loss November 16, 2003; or
2. Accept the claim, or some portion thereof; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
n A. Ruiz, P sonn isk Manager
Approved for submission by:
( L2
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. Bertha Sanchez, Claim for Damages
2
ATTACHMENT 1
FILEWITH: CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
RESFERVE FOR FILING STAMP
City of La Quints TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
P.O. Box 1504
CLAIM
La Quinta, CA 92253
200w 21
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Claims for death, injury to Person or to personal property must be filed not later than six months after
the occurrence. (Gov. Code § 9112.)
0� F L A
l ' cL
2. Claims for damages
hex `.s 0
b real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occumence. (Gov.
Code § 911.2.)
3. Read enure claim form before fang.
4. See page 2 f+or diagram upon which to locate place of acddent
5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom.
6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET.
T' me of City]
Date of Birth of Claimant
Q
_
Name of Claimant
Occupation of Claimant
1
C N cis-s
Home Address of Claimant t City and State
Home Telephone of Claimant
Business Address of Claimant City and StatentRAqQfi
&�siness Tellephone . Claims
Give address and telephone number to which you desires notices r c*mmica6ons to be sent
regarding dais:
Claimant's Social Nb.:
1 - 2 - -�-<
When did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Names of any city employees involved in, INJURY or DAMAGE.
Date: - /t'o - 03 - Time: '
If Clam is .for Equitable Indemnity, give dale
claimant served with the complaint -
Date:
Where did DAMAGE Or INJURY occur? Describe fullv. and lnrate nn manmM nn ra- L-We ..1 &.:.. _L__.
t..-_--
ana awre s and rneasumments from landmarks. T `"O&S' _ - -- ••••v.v vYY"�F^p�t ;�� .IYGGt1WIIICJ
CCU v'� 1 In:Q, S �c-e.�� r'`U t rrt� ('1�l ill S�2 17 floss
Ty
od
Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred.
Why do you claim the city is responsible?
Describe in detail each INJURY or DAMAGE
SEE PAGE 2 (OVER)
THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON
4W
The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this daan, is computed as follows:
Damages incurred to date (exact): Estimated prospective damages as far as known:
Damage to SKY .....................
$
Future expenses for medical and hospital care�-
Expenses for medical and hospital care .....
$ N arm
-'
Future loss of earnings ....................$
AjcAk
Loss of earnings ........................
Special damages for ......................
$ N crn�
$ t8j ese,-�
Other prospective special damages ..........$
Prospective general damages ..............S
,
Azsu�L
AJty%J
General damages .......................
$ ann
Total estimated prospective damages .......$
n1-
Total damages incurred to date ..........
$ � 3 n �
�`
/ 6 Ilk'�
� aC
Total amount claimed as of date of presentation of this daim: $
Was damage and/or injury investigated by police? If so, what city? _
Were paramedics or ambulance called? If so, name city or ambulance
If injured, state, date, time, name and address -of doctor of your initial visit
WITNESSES b DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known do have information:
Name Address. pie
Name Address
Phone
Name Address Phone
DOCTOR AND HOSPITALS:
Hospital
Dolor
Doctor
Address _
Address -
Address
Phone
Phone
Phone
READ CAREFULLY
For all accident claim place on blowing diagram name of streets, including North, accident by"A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the tone of the accident
East. South, And West Wicaie place of accident by "X" and by showing house .. by 1-1- and the point of impact by "X."
numbers or distances to street comers. I City Vehicle was involved, designate by
letter W location of City Vehicle when you tryst saw it, and by "B" location of yourself NOTE: y diagrams below do rat fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram
or your vehicle when you first saw City Vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of signed by claimant.
CURB--�
or person tang on
to Claimant
.l
OkY
SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK
NOTE: CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK (Gov. Code § 915a.)
CURB -�
of a false claim is a felony (Pen. Code § 72.) A!
III
iM"A -sr . =,
f . ;'
� •lw� • b
raw
F •
WPJM
OUegANEMN `A
•r •
• �•1" '
amb
I "
M MI , .
mar- � e ---- ww_J.��►sa�>,u� �.,. wrwsw wew► w��1 Ia�•� •�Iw ��i• -`---s,�........� �------- -- -
mto, MTV. Re
�'
t ,, .
r _. "" .,
_ "� � / V �
,:�' . ,,�
/r �� zit
� v 'S
�. / //�r
C � .. ._ P
C � 1 ', ' a y .- � .tw eb�
a
��
o- '♦
�: �1. k�4a Y� s. rt •J.
r
a
� H. � .i •�` i if
444
C
^ k
i `` ,
I-C- ...
ti s i y
Ypt
_. • j Y� - a tip - • � �t. `•t`�). ��� `_."��,, }�"`q 4,X �,•�
v
_ —10-q
ol
,, GF
f
A-r
Y•� �'i� 4 .
FYI
i a '' •r '� t f.
�' ; u�}� � ,� ,,,FA • `•�l � Yt+F �, x y � ; � ' Y r�td�' i �{t G! k1P+ � �'.,+5� � n�. yi
'm' �� �.,h-d a� x `�, k :. � t,v- +�"T :*.� �+ Jun ,••,'�- y h � ,� Zk
n 4 r'` .� �t°,' . �*v �' " '� k' Ar4 '' i _." Sr 'i�.%'x �RL �"�$�� �aa$f � � "�b �" r S•�•
�+, L �� J.N' �''" .�:j.P �t� ti._.,� r•'`t� 4 Y . 7',,t k•�'`��s^z" Y �?�- �yi�� �'�. a' a i ,
pw
Ali, Alt"
1,7
,• }+a' r ,. ..-'r t,,,.' - r. ` , r iry ! Rit. +w' xtf • ri �,• r 4 r r
jp
W 9�1"
y,F
i t
i it � rg � �5 +� -i � r I • R
r „
�. •; •.
..: ,�� Y` 5�•.,q .•FF
� ..tl �,� 4i• :.7
i`i
��it.,'S
i',_
t
��y.•(�ti ��,�f•t, TN
T41it 4 Z4�&Qumra
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for
the Accounting Manager to Attend the 2004
California Society Municipal Finance Officers
(CSMFO) Annual Conference in Long Beach, CA,
February 28 — March 2, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Accounting Manager to attend
the four -day 2004 California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) Annual
Conference in Long Beach, California, February 28 — March 2, 2004.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Costs associated with attending the Conference will be funded through Fiscal
Services Training & Meetings, Account No. 101-151-637-000. This conference
was budgeted in the 2003/2004 Fiscal Year Budget at $1,500. The breakdown of
expenditures anticipated for this conference is as follows:
• Conference Enrollment - Early Registration $ 225.00
• Travel 125.00
• Lodging/Meals 600.00
Total $1,200.00
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The four -day 2004 California Society Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) Annual
Conference focuses on financial issues affecting local governments. Seminar
information is included in Attachment 1.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Accounting Manager to
attend the four -day 2004 California Society of Municipal Finance Officers
(CSMFO) Annual Conference in Long Beach, California, February 28 - March
2, 2004; or
1. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Accounting
Manager to attend the four -day California Society of Municipal Finance
Officers (CSMFO) Annual Conference in Long Beach, California, February 28
- March 2, 2004; or
2. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respecttully submitted,
ohn M. Falconer, Finance Director
Approved for submission by:
0-�,�
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO)
Annual Conference Agenda
2
CSMFO Annual Conference February 28 - March 2, 2004
Long Beach Convention and Entertainment Center
REGISTRATION PACKET 3
Sunday, February 29th
14+Of
=7`V.;1►
legs
tit
r
Tuesday, March 2nd
Early Registration
Deadline
January 5, 2004
4
I i j
Session Highlights
Pre —Conference Workshop — Saturday, February 28
"FISCAL SUSTAINABIL&D LONG RANGENIVANC PLA1A1TINGAND STRATEGIES"
In tough economic times -- with ]Deal government budgets under siege and fund balances in sharp decline —
long-range financial planning is among the most widely acknowledged ,"best practices" for ensuring
sustainability . As Standard & Poor's has written, "[m]ulti—year planning is a critical exercise. These plans
will often have out —year gaps projected which allow governments to work-out, in advance, the optimal way
to restore fiscal balances."
Please join your colleagues for a one --half day pre -Annual Conference seminar: "Long Range Financial
Planning and Strategies" The serminft will be given by financial management experts from Public Financial
Management, Inc. (PFM). PFM has devised the long --range financial plans behind the successful recoveries
of some of the nation's most distressed localities — including the City of Philadelphia, District of Columbia,.
and Nassau County, New York as well as governments in sound fiscal condition seeking to head off
potential budget strain. The multi year plans developed by PFM have been cited by credit rating agency
Fitch as "good models that can be emulated by local governments,' large and small." This interactive seminar
will share examples of excellence from California and around the country, introduce practical tools and
methodologies for a more effective forecasting, and share approaches for addressing the risks and
uncertainties inherent with multiyear projections.
PF'wll also provide an overview of its Financial Sustainability. Training Program, a new training series
developed exclusively in conjunction with the CSMFO to provide members with targeted seminars on a
range of financial sustainability topics in locations across California over the coming year.
5
0
ri 21 a I ILI 0) 113 to)
The Hyatt Regency Long Beach is located just a few short
steps from our conference facility in the heart of
Downtown Long Beach.
Hotel Highlights:
• Heated outdoor pool, whirlpool, sun deck and pool deck
• Complimentary exercise room featuring lifecycles®,
treadmills, stairmastee and weight machines
• Full —service Gold's Gym® nearby (daily fee)
• 6 mile beach (1 /4 mile from hotel) with walking,
jogging and bicycling paths
• Golf nearby with arrangements through concierge:
5 miles, 9—hole and 18—hole Recreation Park Golf Club;
6 miles, 18—hole Sky Links Golf Course;
7 miles, 18—hole Lakewood Country Club
• Voice mail for guest rooms
• Coffee makers
• Hairdryer and iron/ironing board
• Individual climate control
• Computer data port
• Video check—out
STUDIOS TOUR
`
DOIXiERi
STADIUM
HOLLYWOOD
LOS ANGELES
�
AP „y
ANAHEIM
MOWLAW STADIUM
so
WAX MUSE,
KN(] BERRY
A ELES `t
FARM •
Al ORT
a . •
AIRP
OHLOS ALAMITOS D SNEY
ACE TRAGIC
GE Co.
,`
BEACH CONVENTION
• A�INMENT CENTER
■ HYA ---
PORT O'CA�LL
N WEE
0
PACIFIC OCEAN
�CAT'AUNA ISLAND
HOTEL REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Single/Double Room Rate:
$155 plus tax (currently 12%) $20 for each additional
person over 2.
Hotel Reservation Deadline:
January 28, 2004
Hyatt Regency Long Beach
Phone: (562) 491-1234
Address: 200 S. Pine Street
Long Beach, CA 90802
Conference and Hotel Parking
Parking for hotel guests at the Hyatt Regency Long Beach is $10
for self parking; $14 for valet (this includes in and out privileges).
For attendees not staying at the Hyatt Regency, the rate is $6 for
self —parking; $8 for valet parking (with no in and out privileges).
There is also parking available at the Long Beach Convention
and Entertainment Center at the rate of $8 per day (subject to
change).
DR"G D=IC -ON
Directions from Los Angeles Intermatidteel Airport:
Take the 405 Freeway South to the 710 Freeway South
towards Long Beach. As you approach the end of the
freeway, stay to the left and follow the blue signs to the
Long Beach Aquarium. Do not take the Port of Long Beach
exit not the Broadway exit. Stay on the freeway which
will end' and tarn into Shoreline Drive. You will pass the
aquarium and continue on Shoreline Drive until you reach
Pine Avenue.. Make a left on Pine Avenue and a right into
the hotel driveway which will lead you to the hotel parking
structure. If you have any questions regarding directions
please contact the Hotel Concierge at (562) 491-1234
extension 51.
i 6
REGISTRATION DEADLINES Confirmation Continuing Education Credit
Conference:
Conference Registration submitted by January Continuing Education' Credit (CEC) will be
January 5, 2004 Early Registration 5, 2004 will receive confirmation of your granted for education sessions attended. CEC
February 2, 2004 Registration registration via e—mail at the address you request forms will be available at each session.
After February 2, 2004, registrants should provided on the registration form. Certificates will be mailed following the event.
fax a copy of the registration form to (916) 658— Cancellation and Refund Policy Special Assistance
8240 and remit payment on —site.
Golf Tournament, Ice Dogs & Spousal Tour. Early registrants unable to attend may request CSMFO Staff will be glad to assist you with
January 28, 2004 Golf Tournament
February 2, 2004 Ice Dogs Hockey
February 2, 2004 Spousal Tours
After January 28, 2004, golf tournament
registrants should contact Dennis Keith at
(562) 570-6229 for space availability.
a refund, less processing charge of $35 by
submitting a written request to:
CSMFO 2004 Annual Conference
400 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
any special needs (i.e. physical, dietary, etc.) .
Please identify any special needs on your
registration form.
Contact Information:
Registration Information (916) 658-8210
After February 2, 2004, Spousal Tour and No refund request will be accepted after Conference Information (562) 570-6229
Hockey registrants should fax a copy of the February 2, 2004. Substitute attendees will be Exhibitor & Sponsor (805) 388-5320
registration form to(562) 570-6780 and remit accepted at any time. Spousal Tour (562) 570-5045
payment by February 20, 2004. Golf Tournament (562) 570-6845
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES Exhibitor and Sponsor Information
Additional Information
$225 Early Registration For Exhibitor and Sponsor information, please
$275 Late Registration call the CSMFO Exhibition Hall Committee Additional Information is available on the
Return registration form and registration fee Chair, Anita Lawrence CSMFO website at www.csmfo.org
payment to: at (805) 388-5320.
CSMFO 2004 Annual Conference
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 05814
(Postmarks are acceptable)
Full Conference Registration fee includes all
general sessions, materials, sbciW events and
meal functions.
Daily Conference Registration fee includes the
general session materials for the day and meal
functions (breakfast and lunch, if scheduled).
The Daily Registration does not include any
social events such as the Welcome Reception
and Dinner Gala.
Please register as early as possible. Fees for
additional persons to attend events are as listed
on the registration form. Hotel rooms and
conference space are available on a first —come,
first —served basis.
Payment must accompany the registration form.
Please make check payable to:
"CSMFO 2004 Annual Conference"
Please note "Cancellation and Refund Policy".
Registration forms postmarked after January 5,
2004 must pay the late registration fee
which may not include conference attendee
giveaways.
Suggested Attire
Attire is business casual.
11J
CSMFO 2004 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FORM
' Please use a separate form for each registration. Photocopies are accepted. Confirmations will be sent via e-mail.
NAME (LAST. FIRST►:
TITLE: ORGANIZATION:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
TELEPHONE: FAX: E-MAIL:
Pre -Conference Workshop;
Fiscal Sustainability (Saturday, February 28, 2004; 1:00 - 5:00 p.m.)
$ 85 $
Full Conference Registration (includes all events, sessions and meals)
Government Early Registration (by 1/05/04)
$225 $
Late Registration (after 1/05/04)
$275 $
Commercial (Non-Exhibitor/Non-Sponsor)
Early Registration (by 1/05/04)
$425 $
Late Registration (after 1/05/04)
$490 $
Daily Conference Registration:* ❑ Sunday ❑ Monday
* (includes breakfast and lunch, if scheduled)
Daily Government . Early Registration (by 1/05/04)
Late Registration (after 1/05/04)
Daily Commercial (Non-Exhibitor/Non-Sponsor)
Early Registration (by 1/05/04)
Late Registration (after 1/05/04)
Spouse/Guest Events and/or Additional Meal Tickets
Spouse/Guest Name (Last, First):
❑ Tuesday ( Please check days) of aftendanae)
x $100
$
x $135
$
x $200
$
x $250
$
Full Conference Registration (includes all events, sessions and meals).
x $225
Sunday Box Lunch
x $ 25
Sunday Reception
x $ 35
Monday Breakfast
x $ 25
Monday Luncheon
x $ 30
Monday Banquet
x $ 75
Tuesday Breakfast
x $ 25
Tuesday Concluding Luncheon
x $ 30
Special Requests for Meals: ❑ vegetarian ❑ vegetarian for Spouse/Guest
Payment Options: ❑ Check ❑ visa ❑ MasterCard
Account Number: Expires:
Name on Card:
Please meke checks payable to CSMFO Annual Conference.
Signature:
TOTAL FEES
Mail by February 2, 2004 to: CSMFO, 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814. (postmarks are acceptable)
After February 2, 2004, registrants should fax a copy of the registration form to (916) 658-8240 and remit payment on -site. Early registrants unable
to attend may request a refund, less a processing charge of $35 by submitting a written request to the same address by February 2, 2004. No refund
requests will be accepted after February 2, 2004. Substitute attendees will be accepted at any time.
CSMFO Registration Information Only: (916) 658-8210; CSMFO General Conference Information (562) 57"229 1 11 - 8
4
c� OF
AGENDA CATEGORY:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
BUSINESS SESSION:
ITEM TITLE: Approval of Annual District Information
Sheets for the City of La Quinta Assessment District
Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal Year End
June 30, 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve, receive and file the Annual District Information Sheets for the City of La
Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal Year End
June 30, 2003 (Attachment 1).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
In an effort to monitor the condition of the City-wide Assessment Districts and to
report to the investment community the status of the City Assessment Districts,
district information sheets have been prepared.
Based upon staff review of the Disclosure Information Sheets and based upon
discussions with MuniFinancial, who prepared the documents, adequate reserves
are available to meet debt service payments for the Fiscal Year 2003/04.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
111ti
1 . Approve, receive and file the Annual District Information Sheets for the City
of La Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal
Year End June 30, 2003; or
2. Do not approve, receive and file the District Information Sheets for the City
of La Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and 97-1 for Fiscal
Year End June 30, 2003; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
ohn K. Falconer, finance Director
Approved for submission by:
'Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. 2002/03 District Information Sheets for the City of La
Quinta Assessment District Nos. 90-1, 91-1, 92-1 and
97-1
1113
2
ATTACHMENT 1
Assessment District No. 90-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
BOND STATUS
as of 11 /20/2003
DISTRICT STATUS
District Information Sheet
Outstanding Principal: $155,000.00
Annual Debt Service For Amount
2003 $ 85,750.00
2004 $ 85, 850.00
No. of
Fiscal
Amount
Percent
Parcels
Range of Annual Assessments
Year Assessment
Delinquent
Delinquent
Delinquent
for Fiscal Year 2003/04
2002/03 $121,744.04
$4,811.33
3.95%
32
Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $799.90
2003/04 $125,147.82
$0.00
0.00%
0
Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $26.14
Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $171.20
BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION
Original Issue Amount (Par)
$1,227,154.97
Final Maturity:
September 2, 2005
Date of Issuance
July 2, 1990
Bond Call Notice (days)
30
Coupon Payment Dates March 2, September 2
DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION
Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio
721.27
Total Assessed Improvements
$58,946,668.00
Total Assessed Value
$77,424,673.00
Total Assessed Land
$18,478,005.00
Type of Improvements: Sanitary sewer system
ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION
as of 07/24/03
Number
Percentage of
Percentage of Annual
Category
of Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessment
Improved Parcels
598
81.81 %
82.30%
Unimproved Parcels
133
18.19 %
17.70%
Total
731
100.00 %
100.00%
FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Fund As of Date Balance Type of Investment Funds Administered By
Redemption Fund October 31, 2003 $29,973.34 Held by Agency
Reserve Fund October 31, 2003 $123,457.92 Held By Agency
Approx. Reserve Requirement: $108,174.00
All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 0 2
(t
3
District Information Sheet
Assessment District No. 90-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION
as of 08/12/03
Tax Year
Total
Assessment
Delinquencies
(current)
Delinquency Rate
(current)
Delinquent No.
of Parcels
1998/99
$129,566.90
$530.66
0.41 %
3
1999/00
$126,961.22
$724.28
0.57%
4
2000/01
$126,473.26
$759.20
0.60%
4
2001 /02
$123, 370.94
$1,442.32
1.17%
10
2002/03
$121,744.04
$4,811.33
3.95%
32
PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT
Based on County Property Data as of 07/24/03
Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed
Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2003104 Assessment Value
HENRY GRISWOLD 51 6.98% $8,369.78 6.68% $221,865.00
Aggregate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shown on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the
secured roll may cause multiple listings for the some owner or for the data to be incomplete.
CALL PROVISIONS
Optional Redemption:
PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER
None listed
VALUE TO LIEN RATIO:
as of 07/24/03
% of Total
Value to Lien
No. of
% of
Aggregate
Remaining
Remaining
Ratio
Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessed Value
Assessment Lien
Principal
30:1 and Above
664
90.83%
$77,162,768.00
$97,810.80
91.12%
10:1 to 29.99:1
67
9.17%
$261,905.00
$9,533.83
8.88%
5:1 to 9.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
3:1 to 4.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
2:1 to 2.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
1:1 to 1.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Less than 1:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Undefined
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Total
731
100.00%
$77,424,673.00
$107,344.63
100.00%
(1) Remaining Assessment Lien is reduced by any principal amounts included on the 2002/03 Annual Assessment.
All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 f 2
4
District Information Sheet
Assessment District No. 91-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
BOND STATUS
as of 11 /20/2003
Outstanding Principal: $420,000.00
Annual Debt Service For Amount
2003
$ 162,060.00
2004
$158,560.00
DISTRICT STATUS
No. of
Fiscal
Amount Percent
Parcels Range of Annual Assessments
Year Assessment
Delinquent Delinquent
Delinquent for Fiscal Year 2003104
2002/03 $240,986.68
$8,691.55 3.60%
44 Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $988.14
2003/04 $240,182.32
$0.00 0.00%
0 Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $24.66
Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $236.63
BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION
Original Issue Amount (Par)
$2,240,866.05
Final Maturity: September 2, 2006
Date of Issuance
July 17, 1991
Bond Call Notice (days) 30
Coupon Payment Dates
March 2, September 2
DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION
Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio 317.09
Total Assessed Improvements $94,489,389.00
Total Assessed Value
$125,685,140.00
Total Assessed Land $31,195,751.00
Type of Improvements: Sanitary sewer, perimeter wall
ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION
as of 07/24/03
Number
Percentage of
Percentage of Annual
Category
of Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessment
Improved Parcels
847
83.45 %
84.01 %
Unimproved Parcels
168
16.55 %
15.99%
Total
1,015
100.00 %
100.00%
FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Fund As of Date Balance Type of Investment Funds Administered By
Redemption Fund October 31, 2003 $119,182.81 Held By City
Reserve Fund October 31, 2003 $227,353.81 Held By City
Approx. Reserve Requirement: $203,704.00
All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 of 2
.,I u
5
District Information Sheet
Assessment District No. 91-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION
as of 08/12/03
Tax Year
Total
Assessment
Delinquencies
(current)
Delinquency Rate
(current)
Delinquent No.
of Parcels
1998/99
$244,985.28
$932.90
0.38%
5
1999/00
$242,973.24
$764.48
0.31 %
4
2000/01
$240,877.80
$889.26
0.37%
3
2001 /02
$240,629.68
$2,127.88
0.88%
11
2002/03
$240,986.68
$8,691.55
3.61 %
44
PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT)
based on County Property Data as of 07/24/03
Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed
Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2003104 Assessment Value
There are currently no parcel owners
representing 5% or more of the total
assessment.
Aggregate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shorn on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the
secured roll may cause multiple listings for the some owner or for the data to be incomplete.
CALL PROVISIONS
Optional Redemption:
PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER
None listed
VALUE TO LIEN RATIO:
as of 07/24/03
% of Total
Value to Lien
No. of
% of
Aggregate
Remaining
Remaining
Ratio
Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessed Value
Assessment Lien �'�
Principal
30:1 and Above
943
92.91 %
$125,280,398.00
$370,915.73
93.58%
10:1 to 29.99:1
69
6.80%
$390,757.00
$22,962.49
5.79%
5:1 to 9.99:1
2
0.20%
$10,036.00
$1,700.74
0.43%
3:1 to 4.99:1
1
0.10%
$3,949.00
$792.87
0.20%
2:1 to 2.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
1:1 to 1.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Less than 1:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Undefined
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Total
1,015
100.01%
$125,685,140.00
$396,371.83
100.00%
(1) Remaining Assessment Lien is reduced by any principal amounts included on the 2002/03 Annual Assessment.
All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 of 2
District Information Sheet
Assessment District No. 92-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
BOND STATUS
as of 11 /20/2003
Outstanding Principal: $680,000.00
Annual Debt Service For Amount
2003
$ 157,815.00
2004
$ 161,720.00
DISTRICT STATUS
No. of
Fiscal Amount Percent
Parcels Range of Annual Assessments
Year Assessment Delinquent Delinquent
Delinquent for Fiscal Year 2003104
2002/03 $186,319.04 $4,852.38 2.60%
28 Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $2,549.60
2003/04 $190,689.54 $0.00 0.00%
0 Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $2.20
Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $245.42
BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION
Original Issue Amount (Par) $1,880,891.50
Final Maturity: September 2, 2008
Date of Issuance September 1, 1993
Bond Call Notice (days) 30
Coupon Payment Dates March 2, September 2
DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION
Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio 204.99
Total Assessed Improvements $90,950,854.00
Total Assessed Value $122,881,726.00
Total Assessed Land $31,930,872.00
Type of Improvements: Storm drains, streets, water
ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION
as of 07/24/03
Number
Percentage of
Percentage of Annual
Category
of Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessment
_
Improved Parcels
674
86.52 %
85.92%
Unimproved Parcels
105
13.48 %
14.08%
Total
779
100.00 %
100.00%
FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Fund As of Date Balance Type of Investment Funds Administered By
Redemption Fund October 31, 2003 $31,107.43 Held By City
Reserve Fund October 31, 2003 $193,234.57 Held By City
Approx. Reserve Requirement: $161,720.00
All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 of 2
ir43
7
District Information Sheet
Assessment District No. 92-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION
as of 08/12/03
Total
Delinquencies
Delinquency Rate
Delinquent No.
Tax Year
Assessment
(current)
(current)
of Parcels
1998/99
$194,516.50
$0.00
0.00%
0
1999/00
$188,603.62
$229.92
0.12%
1
2000/01
$185,973.20
$606.82
0.33%
3
2001/02
$188,969.18
$831.88
0.44%
5
2002/03
$186,319.04
$4,852.38
2.60%
28
PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT)
based on County Property Data as of 07/24/03
Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed
Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2003104 Assessment Value
There are currently no parcel owners
representing 5% or more of the total
assessment.
Aggregate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shown on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the
secured roll may cause multiple listings for the same owner or for the data to be incomplete.
CALL PROVISIONS
Optional Redemption:
PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER
M.L. Stem & Co.
VALUE TO LIEN RATIO:
as of 07/24/03
% of Total
Value to Lien
No. of
% of
Aggregate
Remaining
Remaining
Ratio
Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessed Value
Assessment Lien �'�
Principal
30:1 and Above
705
90.50%
$122,249,831.00
$548,614.29
91.52%
10:1 to 29.99:1
36
4.62%
$491,349.00
$24,468.13
4.08%
5:1 to 9.99:1
31
3.98%
$125,154.00
$20,366.44
3.40%
3:1 to 4.99:1
5
0.64%
$15,392.00
$3,463.53
0.58%
2:1 to 2.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
1:1 to 1.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Less than 1:1
2
0.26%
$0.00
$2,542.99
0.42%
Undefined
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Total
779
100.00%
$122,881,726.00
$599,455.37
100.00%
(1) Remaining Assessment Lien is reduced by any principal amounts included on the 2002/03 Annual Assessment.
Al assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 of 2
Assessment District No. 97-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
BOND STATUS
as of 11 /20/2003
DISTRICT STATUS
District Information Sheet
Outstanding Principal: $600,000.00
Annual Debt Service For Amount
2003 $ 63,735.00
2004 $ 62,355.00
No. of
Fiscal
Amount
Percent
Parcels
Range of Annual Assessments
Year Assessment
Delinquent
Delinquent
Delinquent
for Fiscal Year 2003/04
2002/03 $69,416.60
$1,762.95
2.53%
3
Highest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $724.44
2003/04 $70,899.80
$0.00
0.00%
0
Lowest Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $359.16
Average Annual Assessment Per Parcel: $675.24
BOND SUMMARY INFORMATION
Original Issue Amount (Par)
$745,000.00
Final Maturity:
September 2, 2018
Date of Issuance
December 3, 1998
Bond Call Notice (days)
30
Coupon Payment Dates March 2, September 2
DISTRICT SUMMARY INFORMATION
Overall Assessed Value / Lien Ratio
34.96
Total Assessed Improvements
$15,779,241.00
Total Assessed Value
$20,717,836.00
Total Assessed Land
$4,938,595.00
Type of Improvements: Roads, water, sewer, and landscape
ACTIVE PARCEL INFORMATION
as of 07/24/03
Number
Percentage of
Percentage of Annual
Category
of Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessment
Improved Parcels
105
100.00%
100.00%
Unimproved Parcels
0
0.00%
0.00%
Total
105
100.00%
100.00%
FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Fund As of Date Balance Type of Investment Funds Administered By
Redemption Fund October 31, 2003 $21,526.67 Held By City
Reserve Fund October 31, 2003 $73,783.81 Held By City
Approx. Reserve Requirement: $63,035.00
All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFinancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 1 of 2
1;)0 9
District Information Sheet
Assessment District No. 97-1
City of La Quinta, Riverside, CA
OUTSTANDING DELINQUENCY INFORMATION
as of 08/12/03
Tax Year
Total
Assessment
Delinquencies
(current)
Delinquency Rate
(current)
Delinquent No.
of Parcels
1999/00
$66,414.60
$0.00
0.00%
0
2000/01
$66,323.70
$0.00
0.00%
0
2001 /02
$65,457.70
$0.00
0.00%
0
2002/03
$69,416.60
$1,762.95
2.54%
3
PARCEL OWNERS (REPRESENTING 5% OR MORE OF TOTAL ASSESSMENT)
based on County Property Data as of 07/24/03
Number % of Total Annual Assessment % of Annual Assessed
Owner of Parcels Parcels for Fiscal Year 2003/04 Assessment Value
There are currently no parcel owners
representing 5% or more of the total
assessment.
Aggrepate information for each owner listed is based on owner name as shown on the applicable secured roll maintained by the county. Accordingly, variations in the owner name shown on the
secured roll may cause multiple listings for the same owner or for the data to be incomplete.
CALL PROVISIONS
Optional Redemption:
PRINCIPLE UNDERWRITER
None listed
VALUE TO LIEN RATIO:
as of 07/24/03
% of Total
Value to Lien
No. of
% of
Aggregate
Remaining
Remaining
Ratio
Parcels
Total Parcels
Assessed Value
Assessment Lien �'�
Principal
30:1 and Above
75
71.43%
$15,976,483.00
$419,303.95
70.75%
10:1 to 29.99:1
30
28.57%
$4,741,353.00
$173,383.80
29.25%
5:1 to 9.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
3:1 to 4.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
2:1 to 2.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
1:1 to 1.99:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Less than 1:1
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Undefined
0
0.00%
$0.00
$0.00
0.00%
Total
105
100.00%
$20,717,836.00
$592,687.75
100.00%
(1) Remaining Assessment Lien is reduced by any principal amounts included on the 2002/03 Annual Assessment.
All assessed values are based on data obtained from the applicable county. The information pertaining to the District and its underlying security has
been obtained by MuniFlnancial from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The release of this
information is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an endorsement of such security nor a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold such
security.
Compiled by: MuniFinancial 27368 Via Industda, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 587-3500 www.muni.com Page 2 of 2
ri..a
�. 10
ce4t�v 4 4 QaAraj
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Approval of Annual Continuing
Disclosure for the City of La Quinta 2000-1
Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30,
2003
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve, receive and file the Annual Continuing Disclosure for the City of La
Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2003.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On November 10, 1994, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted
amendments to existing federal regulations (Rule 15c2-12) for bonds issued after
July 3, 1995, requiring issuers of municipal securities (Bond issues) to do the
following annually for each bond issue:
1. Prepare official statements meeting the content requirement of Rule
15c2-12.
2. File certain financial information and operating data with national and
state repositories each year.
3. Prepare announcements of the significant events including payment
defaults, defeasances and draws on a reserve fund as the events
occur.
v <.
Attachment 1 is the 2002/03 Annual Continuing Disclosure Statement for the City
of La' Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District - La Quinta, prepared in accordance with
the three aforementioned requirements. Additionally, no announcement of
significant events was necessary for Fiscal Year 2002/03.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve, receive and file the Annual Continuing Disclosure for the City of La
Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2003; or
1. Do not approve, receive and file the Annual Continuing Disclosure for the
City of La Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District for Fiscal Year End June 30,
2003; or
2. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Johd M. Falconer, F' ance Director
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. 2002/03 Annual Continuing Disclosure Statement for the
City of La Quinta 2000-1 Assessment District
ik;3
2
ATTACHMENT 1
2002/2003
ANNUAL INFORMATION STATEMENT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.2000-1
(PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS)
LIMITED OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS
CITY OF LA QU I NTA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
14
3
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
CITY OF LA QUINTA
www.la-quinta.org
John Falconer
Finance Director
P.O. Box 1504
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
(619) 777-7150
DISCLOSURE CONSULTANT & DISSEMINATION AGENT
MuniFinancial"
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 587-3500
Report available for viewin_o
www.muni.com
UNDERWRITER
Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc.
BOND COUNSEL
Rutan & Tucker LLP
Costa Mesa, California
PAYING AGENT
Brad Scarbrough
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
633 West 5th Street, 24th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 615-6047
* In its role as Disclosure Consultant and Dissemination Agent, MuniFinancial has not passed upon the accuracy,
completeness or fairness of the statements contained herein.
\J V
4
L INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to an Official Statement dated June 21, 2000, the City of La Quinta, (the
"City") issued $2,285,000 Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements)
(the "District"), Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds (the "Bonds"). The Bonds were
issued to finance the construction and acquisition of sewer improvements within the
areas commonly known as Village Cove, Westward Ho Drive and
Bottlebrush/Sagebrush/Saguaro Streets, which are located within the Assessment
District.
The City, which comprises approximately 34.8 square miles, is located in the Coachella
Valley, twenty miles from Palm Springs and 127 miles from Los Angeles.
The District includes three non-contiguous areas in the City. The three areas are the
Village Cove section, Westward Ho Drive, and Bottlebrush/Sagebrush/Saguaro Streets.
The Village Cove Section is generally located in the area bounded by Calle Tampico on
the north, Calle Sinaloa on the south, Washington Street on the east, and Eisenhower
Drive on the west. The Westward Ho Drive Area is bounded by Dune Palms Road on
the west, Jefferson Street on the east, Westward Ho Drive on the north, and the
Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Stormwater Channel on the south.
The Bonds are limited obligation improvement bonds secured by unpaid assessments
on the properties in the District. The Bonds are not a debt of the City, the State of
California, or any of its political subdivisions and neither the City, the State of California,
nor any of its political subdivisions is liable. The Bonds do not constitute indebtedness
within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limit or restriction.
This Annual Information Statement is being provided pursuant to a covenant made by
the Agency for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds and includes the information
specified in a Continuing Disclosure Certificate. For further information and a more
complete description of the City and the Bonds, reference is made to the Official
Statement.
2002103 — Assessment District 2000-1 City of La Quinta
5
ll. BOND INFORMATION
A. PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING
Bond Issue As of October 31, 2003
Assessment District No. 2000-1
(Phase VI Improvements) $1,880,000.00
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds
B. FUND BALANCES
Fund Name As of October 31, 2003
Reserve Fund $250,400.87
Reserve Requirement(') $228,500.00
Construction/improvement $445,953.96
(1) The Reserve Requirement was calculated based on the lesser of a) maximum annual debt service on the outstanding
bonds b) 125% of the average annual debt service on the bonds, or c) 10% of the amount of the bonds as set forth in the
Official Statement.
Source: City of La Quinta, as compiled by MuniFinancial as of October 31, 2003.
2002103 — Assessment District 2000-1 City of La Quinta 2
Ill. OPERATING INFORMATION
A. PARCEL INFORMATION BY ZONING
2003/2004 Assessed Value
% Of Average
Number Remaining Remaining Value
of Assessment Assessment to
Parcels Land Structure Total Lien Lien Lien
Developed Commercial 17 $756,282 $2,720,517 $3,476,799 $69,859.72 3.73% 49.77
Undeveloped Commercial 23 1,883,536 35,363 1,918,899 123,999.25 6.62% 15.48
Subtotal Commercial
40
$2,639,818
$2,755,880
$5,395,698
$193,858.97
10.35%
27.83
Developed Residential
317
10,666,076
36,330,306
46,996,382
1,235,135.15
65.95%
38.05
Undeveloped Residential
107
2,948,699
97,426
3,046,125
443,850.61
23.70%
6.86
Subtotal Residential 424 $13,614,775 $36,427,732 $50,042,507 $1,678,985.76 89.65% 29.81
Grand Total 464 $16,254,593 $39,183,612 $55,438,205 $1,872,844.73 100.00% 29.60
Source: Riverside County 2003/2004 Secured Property Roll, as compiled by MuniFinancial.
The number of active parcels in the District have decreased from the original number of
parcels securing the Bonds due to prepayments of the assessments through the Sewer
Fee Subsidy program offered by the City to property owners who qualified.
B. PARCEL INFORMATION BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS
2003/2004 Assessed Value
% Of Average
Number Remaining Remaining Value
Of Assessment Assessment to
Parcels Land Structure Total Lien Lien Lien
Developed Commercial
17 $756,282
$2,720,517
$3,476,799
$69,859.72
3.73% 49.77
Developed Residential
317 10,666,076
36,330,306
46,996,382
1,235,135.15
65.95% 38.05
Subtotal Developed
334 $11,422,358
$39,050,823
$50,473,181
$1,304,994.87
69.68% 87.82
Undeveloped Commercial
23
1,883,536
35,363
1,918,899
123,999.25
6.62%
15.48
Undeveloped Residential
107
2,948,699
97,426
3,046,125
443,850.61
23.70%
6.86
Subtotal Undeveloped
130
$4,832,235
$132,789
$4,965,024
$567,849.86
30.32%
22.34
Grand Total 464 $16,254,593 $39,183,612 $55,438,205 $1,872,844.73 100.00% 29.60
Source: Riverside County 2003/2004 Secured Property Roll, as compiled by MuniFinancial.
The number of active parcels in the District have decreased from the original number of
parcels securing the Bonds due to prepayments of the assessments through the Sewer
Fee Subsidy program offered by the City to property owners who qualified.
2002103 — Assessment District 2000-1 City of La Quinta 3
C. DELINQUENCY SUMMARY
Number of
Fiscal Number Parcels Annual Assessment Percent
Year of Parcels Delinquent �'� Assessment Delinquent (2) Delinquent
2000/01 468 6 $243,338 $3,034 1.25%
2001/02 464 10 $245,572 $3,715 1.51%
2002/03 464 29 $242,218 $13,002 5.37%
(1) Prior to the Fiscal Year 2003/2004 Levy, there were 32 individual parcels delinquent. No foreclosure action has been taken,
due to the foreclosure covenants, which state $2,000 per parcel or 10% Delinquency rate for the entire District. On May 29,
2003, 31 Reminder letters were sent out, and on May 30, 2003, 30 Demand Letters were sent out. At this time, no delinquent
taxpayer is responsible for 5% or more of the total Assessment levied.
(2) Amount delinquent as of August 12, 2003
Source: Riverside County, as compiled by MuniFinancial
D. VALUE TO DEBT
The following table sets forth by Value to Debt, the Remaining Bonded Debt and
Assessed Value for parcels within the District.
% Of
Number
Remaining
Remaining
of
2003104 Assessed
2003/04 Assessed
2003/04 Total
Assessment
Assessment
Average Value to Lien
Parcels
Land Value
Structure Value
Assessed Value
Lien .
Lien
Greater than 30
226
$9,858,797
$31,844,645
$41,703,442
$865,554
46.22%
20 to 29.99
80
2,796,239
5,501,557
8,297,796
339,621
18.13%
10 to 19.99
52
1,519,164
1,718,683
3,237,847
211,660
11.30%
5 to 9.99
43
1,522,973
117,423
1,640,396
215,717
11.52%
3 to 4.99
20
323,758
0
323,758
79,105
4.22%
1 to 2.99
26
189,495
1,304
190,799
99,069
5.29%
Less than 1
17
44,167
0
44,167
62,120
3.32%
Grand Total
464
$16,254,593
$39,183,612
$55,438,205
$1,872,845
100.00%
Source: Riverside County 2003/2004 Secured Property Roll, as compiled by MuniFinancial.
2002103 - Assessment District 2000-1 City of La Quinta
4ii
IV. SIGNATURE
The information set forth herein has been furnished by the City and by sources, which
are believed to be accurate and reliable but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or
completeness. Statements contained in this Annual Information Statement which
involve estimates, forecasts, or other matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so
described herein, are intended solely as such and are not to be construed as
representations of fact. Further, the information and expressions of opinion contained
herein are subject to change without notice and the delivery of this Annual Information
Statement will not, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been
no change in the affairs of the City or any other parties described herein.
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Y
lconer
Director
December , 2003
2002103 - Assessment District 2000-1 City of La Quinta 5
�;;4�
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
Approval of a Supplemental Agreement with
Riverside County for the Use of Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for
Reconstruction of Eisenhower Drive, and Public
Service Funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La
Quinta Unit
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: 15
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve the Supplemental Agreement (Attachment 1) and authorize the Mayor to sign
the Agreement to utilize the sum of $204,427 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for the
Reconstruction of Eisenhower Drive ($174,427), and public service funds for the Boys
and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The City will receive total reimbursement of $204,427 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for
1) the Reconstruction of Eisenhower Drive, ($174,427), and 2) public service funds for
the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000).
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The purpose of this Supplemental Agreement between the City and Riverside County is
to authorize the use of CDBG funds for FY 2003-2004 in the amount of $204,427 in
accordance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. This
allocation reflects a proportional share of Riverside County's entitlement allocation
from H.U.D. The City submitted CDBG applications to the County for the projects in
January, 2003; the applications were subsequently approved by the Board of
Supervisors.
161
C•\r`i+-RA-,%CTACC QCOr1DTC t-WI V%r`71 A-,
This Supplemental Agreement is for CDBG projects which were approved by the City
Council on January 21, 2003 under Resolution 2003-009, and are available with the
beginning of the new Federal Fiscal Year, which begins October 1, 2003. Monies
become available for reimbursement to the City upon approval of this Agreement by
the City and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors.
For the past 19 years, the City of La Quinta has been participating in the Urban
Counties CDBG program with Riverside County. Entitlement Funds have been
expended for projects such as: Senior Center construction, La Fonda Street
construction and public service funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit. The
City has previously entered into Supplemental Agreements with the County for the use
of CDBG funds.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve the Supplemental Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the
Agreement to utilize the sum of $204,427 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for the
Reconstruction Eisenhower Drive ($174,427), and public service funds for the
Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000); or
2. Do not approve the Supplemental Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign
the Agreement to utilize the sum of $204,427 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for
the Reconstruction of Eisenhower Drive ($174,427), and public service funds
for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000); or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
rry Hdrrhan
C mmunity Development Director
Approved for Submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. Supplemental Agreement
C•\r`Lr..�A...FCTACC DCD/IDTC rNKII V\/'71 A-,
2
R�
t,
ATTACHMENT 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
File: 4.LQ031, 4.LQ032
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein called, "COUNTY," and the
CITY OF LA QUINTA, herein called "CITY," mutually agree as follows:
1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation Agreement dated July 2,
2002, whereby CITY elected to participate with COUNTY, which has qualified as an "Urban County"
for purposes of receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and to assist and
undertake essential community development and housing assistance activities pursuant to the Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Act". Said
Cooperation Agreement dated July 2, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this
Agreement as if each and every provision was set forth herein.
2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist with the community
development activities, within its jurisdiction, by utilizing the sum of $204,427, CDBG Entitlement
Funds, as specifically identified in Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and consist of 3 pages (each),
and by this reference are incorporated herein, for the projects:
4 LQ031 Reconstruction of Eisenhower Drive, $174,427.
4 LQ032 Membership Fees Waiver Reduction Program, $30,000.
CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through its Economic Development Agency, of the project
plans and specifications prior to CITY's construction of same when a project consists of a construction
activity.
3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement for the projects shall be for a period
II of one (1) year from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004, and proceed consistent with the completion
schedule set forth in Exhibits A and B. In the event that the projects are not substantially completed by
the time set forth in the completion schedule due to unforeseen or uncontrollable causes, the schedule
for the completion of the project may be extended by the period of the enforced delay. Times of
performance may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of CITY and COUNTY. If
Page 1 of 8
1-1C13
13
xi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10.
11
12,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
substantial progress toward completion in conformance with the completion schedule, as determined
I by COUNTY of the projects are not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY
may suspend or terminate this agreement by the procedures set forth in the Section titled
"Termination", of this agreement and the entitlement funds associated with the projects may be
reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate notice is given.
4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shall determine the final
disposition and distribution of all funds received by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the
Iprovisions of Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic Development
Agency, shall: (1) Make payment of the grant funds to CITY as designated in Exhibits A and B; (2) It
is the CITY's responsibility to monitor the projects activity of Exhibits A and B to ensure compliance
with applicable federal regulations and the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall comply with timely
drawdown of funds by submitting monthly requests for reimbursement. All disbursements of grant.
funds will be on a reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the CITY has submitted
its letter identifying payments and documentation which supports expenditures. All authorized
obligations incurred in the performance of the Agreement must be reported by June 4, 2004 for
projects eligible under 570.201(e), Public Services; 3) The COUNTY will directly manage and
monitor projects identified in Exhibits A and B. These projects have been determined to be
Countywide, receiving grant funding from multiple sources; therefore, these projects will be managed
and monitored by the COUNTY.
5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate with COUNTY
in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban
renewal and public assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in carrying out its Strategic Plan of
the Consolidated Plan and other requirements of the Community Development Block Grant Program.
6. LEAD AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
1 QUALITY ACT (.CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15051(d) of Title 14 of the California Administrative
Code, CITY is designated as the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of this
Agreement.
7. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply with all applicable
Page 2 of 8
4
I laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify, save and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency
2 members and their respective agents, servants. and employees of and from any and all liabilities,
3 claims, debt; damages, demands, suits, actions and causes of action of whatsoever kind, nature or sort
4 including, but not by way of limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense of said parties, and the
5 payment of attorney's fees, arising out of or in any manner connected with the performance by CITY
6 under this Agreement.
7 8. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS.
8 a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 and
9 Part 85 and OMB Circular A-87 as applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal
10 funds under this Agreement.
11 b. CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG Entitlement funds received as set
12 forth in Exhibits (A and B).
13 c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make available to COUNTY and to
14 the Department of Housing and Urban Development for examination and copying all of its records and
15 other materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement.
16. d. CITY shall not retain any program income as defined in Section 570.500 of Title 24
17 of the Federal Code of. Regulations. Said program income shall be used only for the activities that are
18 the subject of this Agreement. Further, all provisions of this Agreement shall apply to such activities.
19 e. The CITY shall ensure projects that are serving limited clientele (570.208(a)(2)(i),
20 that at least fifty-one percent (51 %) of the persons benefiting from the CDBG funded activities are of.
21 low and moderate income and meet the program income guidelines attached as Exhibits (A and B).
22 The CITY must provide the direct benefit documentation required.
23 9. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. CITY shall comply with the provisions of the Act and any
24 amendments thereto and the federal regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the.
25 Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations found in Part 85 and Part 570 of
26 Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. CITY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any
27 subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the Community Development Block
28 Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and cited in the above -mentioned Cooperation Agreement.
Page 3of8 165
1W
41
7
8
9
10.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants and employees shall act
at all times in an independent capacity during the term of this Agreement, and shall not act as, shall not
be, nor shall they in any manner be construed to be agents, officers or employees of the COUNTY.
11. TERMINATION.
a. CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement except upon express written consent
I of COUNTY.
b. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 11 a, COUNTY may
suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason
for such action:
(1) In the event CITY fails to perform the covenants herein contained at such
times and in such manner as provided in this Agreement; and
(2) In the event there is a conflict with any federal, state or local law, ordinance,
regulation or rule rendering any of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or untenable; or
(3) In the event the funding from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable.
c. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees to return any unencumbered funds
which it has been provided by COUNTY. In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any
claim or cause of action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement.
d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not to incur any additional cost
with regard to the projects that are cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions.
12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections 570.601 and 570.602 of Title 24
of the Federal Code of Regulations which requires that no person in the United States shall on the
grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with
Community Development funds.
13. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and
appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with the CDBG regulations
Page 4of8
IN.
%I
l;
2
3'
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
. 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
prohibiting conflicts of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by
this reference incorporated herein.
b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers, and elected and
appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with Section A -II of the County's
CDBG Policy manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "Cl" and by this reference incorporated herein.
c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of exception can be granted to the
prohibition against conflict of interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR
570.611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be reviewed by COUNTY to determine
whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is
appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors listed in 24 CFR 570.611 (e).
'd. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY shall provide COUNTY with a list
of all employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials who are in a position
to participate in a decision making process, exercise any functions or responsibilities, or gain inside
information with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement. CITY shall also
promptly disclose to COUNTY any potential conflict, including even the appearance of conflict, that
may arise with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement.
e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement,
I and the Agreement shall be immediately terminated by the COUNTY.
14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY shall bear no liability
for any later determination by the United States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development or any other person or entity .that CITY is or is not eligible under 24 CFR Part 570 to
receive CDBG funds.
15. USE OF PROPERTY. Whenever federal CDBG funds or program income are used, in
whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment or personal property, the property shall not be
transferred from its originally funded use for a period of five (5) years from the date that the City is no
longer a part of the urban COUNTY program. The CITY shall maintain an inventory for COUNTY
review.
16. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. CITY agrees to
Page 5 of 8
17
it2
10
11
12
13
14
]5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
notify and to require any lessee or assignee to notify Riverside County Workforce Development
Center/JTPA and GAIN - Department of Public Social Services of any and all job openings that are
caused by this project.
17. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the project funded pursuant to this
Agreement, during the term of this Agreement, will make reference to the Contribution of the County
of Riverside Community Development Block Grant Program in making the project possible.
18. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION. CITY shall be monitored and
evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely compliance with the provisions of this Agreement
and the effective and efficient achievement of the Program Objectives. Quarterly reports shall be due
on the last day of the month immediately following the end of the quarter being reported. The
quarterly written reports shall include, but shall not be limited to the following data elements:
a. Title of program, listing of components, description of activities/operations.
b. The projected goals, indicated .numerically, and also the goals achieved (for each
report period). In addition, identify by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards
meeting the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered in meeting goals.
c. If CDBG funded Activity meets National Objective under 24 CFR 570.208 (a)(2)(i),
SPONSOR shall report. the following:
1) Total number of direct beneficiaries (clientele served) who are:
• Moderate income
• Low income
• Very -low income
2) Percent of the Low/Moderate income beneficiaries
3) Racial ethnicity of clientele
4) Number of Female Headed Households
SPONSOR shall report beneficiary statistics monthly to EDA on the. pre -approved. Direct
Benefit Form, and Self -Certification Form (certifying income, family size, and racial ethnicity) as
required by HUD. Updated forms are to be provided to said SPONSOR by EDA should HUD
implement changes during the term of this agreement.
L
Page 6 of 8
Is I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this Agreement together with the
cooperation Agreement between the parties, embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation to
the subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative
to this subject matter, exists between the parties at the time of execution.
.20. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Executive Director of the COUNTY's Economic
Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are authorized to take'such ministerial actions as may
be necessary or appropriate to -implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Agreement as it
may be amended from time to time by COUNTY.
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Page 7 of 8
16 9
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 .
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be modified or amended only
by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowered representative of COUNTY and CITY
respectively.
DATED:
ATTEST:
Nancy Romero
Clerk of the Board
Bv:
Deputy
(Seal)
DATED:
ATTEST:
SH:MT:amj
SACDBG\4TH\03_Agreements and Ltr\LQ\SuppAgr_03_LQ.031-.032.doc
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Bv:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
CITY OF LA QUINTA
By:
Mayor
Page 8 of 8
f
EXHIBIT A
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
FILE: 4.LQ031
Sponsor• City of La Quinta
Address• 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quintal CA 92253
Project Title: Reconstruction of Eisenhower Drive
Location• Eisenhower Dr. from Washington St. to Coachella Drive
Description: Sponsor will utilize CDBG funds to reconstruct Eisenhower
Drive that will include roadway reconstruction, sidewalks, and improving
access and circulation in Redevelopment Plan Project Area No. 1. The
project addresses a slum blighted area identified in the City
Redevelopment Plan.
Project Budget:
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs $174,427.00
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
i
TOTAL $174,427.00
V.
EXHIBIT A
Page 2
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Prepare Plans & Specifications
Bid Documents & Review
Bid Advertisement, Bid Review
& Award
Construction
Notice of Completion
Start Date
July 1, 2003
December 2003
March 2004
FILE: 4.LQ031
Completion Date
November 1, 2003
February 2004
May 2004
June 2004
v-1 r)
I12
r
EXHIBIT A
Page 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1.
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
2.
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
TO
July 1, 2003 June 30, 2004
FILE: 4.LQ031
NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-02-UC-06-0506
3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
4. X Original (each year)
Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATU:
Reconstruction of Eisenhower 4.LQ031 Categorically Exempt
Drive
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
City of La Quinta (760)777-7125
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Sponsor will utilize CDBG funds to reconstruct
Eisenhower Drive that will include roadway reconstruction, sidewalks, and
improving access and circulation in Redevelopment Plan Project Area No. 1.
The project addresses a slum blighted area identified in the City
Redevelopment Plan.
ELIGIBILITY: 570.201 (c) BENEFIT: 570.208 (b) (1)
11. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Continue rehabilitation and
reconstruction of Eisenhower Drive to improve circulation and in the
Village area.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Public Facilities $174,427.00
14. Totals $174,427.00 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $174,427.00
1' 13
EXHIBIT B
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Sponsor• City of La Quinta
Address• 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta,__CA 92253
FILE: 4.LQ032
Project Title• Membership Fees Waiver Reduction Program
Location• 49-995 Park Avenue, La Quinta
Description: 'Sponsor will provide financial assistance in the form of a
fee reduction or waiver to low and moderate income families for day care
(after -school services). Clients are identified through referrals and
evaluations. Income and family size is documented.
Project Budget: Total Budget CDBG Budget
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs -fees
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
j 14
EXHIBIT B
Page 2
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Program Services
Submit Quarterly Report
(in accordance to section 26
of Sponsor's Agreement)
Start Date
July 1, 2003
Semi -Annual Monitoring Site Visit
Submit Final Claim for Reimbursement
Program Services Complete
FILE: 4.LQ032
Completion Date
October 31-, 2003
January 31, 2004
`April 30, 2004
July 31, 2004
December 3, 2003
May 15, 2004
June 30, 2004
t
EXHIBIT B
Page 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1.
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
2.
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
TO
July 1, 2003 June 30, 2004
FILE: 4.LQ032
NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-02-UC-06-0506
3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
4. X Original (each year)
Revision, Date
Amendment; Date
5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATU:
Membership Fees Waiver 4.LQ032 Categorically Exempt
Reduction Program
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
City of La Quinta (760)564-5555
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Sponsor will provide financial assistance in
the form of a fee reduction or waiver to low and moderate income families
for day care (after -school services). Clients are identified through
referrals and evaluations. Income and family size is documented.
ELIGIBILITY: 570.201 (e) BENEFIT: 570.208 (a) (2) (i) (B)
11. CENSUS TRACTS)/ENUMERATION DISTRICTS)
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Continue to provide financial assistance
to approximately 115 low/mod youths that attend the La Quinta Unit Boys &
Girls Club.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit
(a)
(b) (c) (d) (e)
Public Services $30,000.00
14. Totals $30,000.00 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $30, 000 . 00
1 Ai U
16
6
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
EXHIBIT CI , page 1 of 4
§ 570.611 Conflict of interest.
(a) Applicability.
(1) In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services
by recipients, and by subrecipients (including those specified at § 570.204 (c) ) ,
the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A 110,
respectively, shall apply.
(2) In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the
provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the acquisition and
disposition of real property and the provision of assistance by the recipient, by
its subrecipients, or to individuals, businesses and other private entities under
eligible activities which authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation,
preservation, and other improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant
to § 570.202, or grants, loans and other assistance to businesses, individuals
and other private entities pursuant to § 570-203, § 570.204 or § 570.455).
(b) Conflicts prohibited. Except for the use of CDBG funds to pay
salaries and other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is
that no persons described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have
exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG activities
assisted under this part or who are in a position to participate in a decision
making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may
obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity,
or have an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect
thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom
they have family or business ties, during their tenure or for one year
thereafter. For the UDAG program, the above restrictions shall apply to all
activities that are a part of the UDAG project, and shall cover any such interest
or benefit during, or at any time after, such person's tenure.
paragraph
consultant
or of any
under this
(c) Persons covered. The
(b) of this section apply to
officer, or elected official
designated public agencies, or
part.
conflict of interest provisions of
any person who is an employee, agent,
or appointed official of the recipient,
subrecipients which are receiving funds
(d) Exceptions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of
the recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of
this section on a case -by -case basis when it determines that such an exception
will serve to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient
administration of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be
considered only after the recipient has provided the following:
(1) A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by
an assurance that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a
description of how the public disclosure was made; and
17
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4
(2) An opinion of the recipient's attorney that the interest
for which the exception is sought would not Violate State or local law.
(e) Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether
to grant a requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the
requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the cumulative
effect of the following factors, where applicable:
(1) Whether the exception would provide a significant cost
benefit or an essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would
otherwise not be available;
(2) Whether an opportunity was provided for open competitive
bidding or negotiation;
(3) Whether the person affected is a member of a group or
class of low or moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the
assisted activity, and the exception will permit such person to receive generally
the same interests or benefits as are being made available or provided to the
group or class;
(4) Whether the affected person has' withdrawn from his - or her
functions or responsibilities, or the decision making process with respect to the
specific assisted activity in question;
(5) Whether the interest or benefit was present before the
affected person was in.a position as described in paragraph (b) of this section;
(6) Whether undue hardship will result either to the recipient
or the person affected when weighed against the public interest served by
avoiding the prohibited conflict; and
(7) Any other relevant considerations.
:i&
W
•
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4
Community Dvlpmt.
Block Grant
Policy Manual
I.D. # A-11
(pg. 2 of 2 )
TOPIC: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: October 1989
iii) Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a
commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on
terms available to the public without regard to official status,
aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided
to, received by or promised to the official within 12 months prior to
the time when the decision is made.
iv) Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer,
partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management.
v) Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or
gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value
provided to, received by, or promised to the official within 12
months prior to the time when the decision is made.
5) For purposes of Section 4., indirect investment or interest means any
investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of an official, by
an agent on behalf of an official, or by a business entity or trust in which the
official, the official's agents, spouse, and dependent children own directly,
indirectly, or beneficially a 10-percent interest or more.
P'i 19
J- QU&S
�c� 9ti5
OF Ti3ti
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Refurbishment BUSINESS SESSION:
Options for the Village Parking Lot, Consent to Use CONSENT CALENDAR:
of Funds from Redevelopment Agency Project Area
No. 1 and Adoption of a Resolution Making Certain STUDY SESSION:
Findings Pursuant to Health and Safety Code PUBLIC HEARING:
Section 33445(a)
RECOMMENDATION:
Consent to the use of $309,210 from RDA Project Area No. 1; select
Refurbishment Option Number 3 - Combination Turf and Pavement; direct staff to
obtain the necessary plans, specifications and engineer's estimate from David Volz
Design to install the proposed improvements to the Village Parking Lot; and adopt a
Resolution making certain findings Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section
33445(a).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The following represents the Staff recommended funding source:
RDA Project Area No. 1 $309,210
Total Recommended Funding: $309,210
The following represents the proposed project budget:
Construction:
$229,000
Design:
$22,900
Inspection/Test/Survey:
$17,750
Administration:
$1 1,450
Contingency:
$28,110
Total:
$309,210
Adequate funding is available from unassigned Redevelopment Project Area No. 1
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\BS 1.doc 1190
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On October 1, 2002, the City Council accepted the Phase VI -A Village Commercial
Area Improvements. The Phase VI -A Improvements included installing turf block
and turf within the City -owned parking lot at the corner of Avenida Bermudas and
Avenida Montezuma.
During the course of the last several months, it has become apparent that the open
celled turf block surface is not performing as desired as most of the turf grass
planting in the open concrete cells has died. Continued vehicle traffic within the
drive isles has led to over compaction of the cells preventing water from
penetrating into the soil. Additionally, new commercial development within The
Village will likely increase parking demand further, justifying improvements to the
City's parking lot. In an attempt to address this situation, staff has obtained an
evaluation and refurbishment recommendations from David Volz Design for the
Village parking lot. The evaluation and recommendations prepared by David Volz
are provided as Attachment 1.
The evaluation provided three options: 1. Refurbish the existing surfacing; 2.
Install a conventional parking lot; or 3. Install a combination turf and pavement
parking lot. These options are discussed below:
1. Refurbish Existing Surfacing - Estimated Cost: $130,000.00
This option would refurbish the turf block and grass surface. Compaction problems
would be corrected, modifications would be made to the irrigation system, and the
grass would be re-established. A preliminary concept plan for Option 1 is
presented as Exhibit 1 of the attached report.
Staff believes selecting this option would solve the problem for the short term;
however, continued use of the parking lot would result in a recurrence of the same
problems currently being addressed.
2. Install Conventional Parking Lot - Estimated Cost: $434,780.00 (with shade
Structures: $732,000.00)
Option 2 would replace the existing turf block with asphalt concrete pavement.
Enhanced landscaping would be installed along the parking lot perimeter to soften
the look and reduce the heat gain on the site. Shade structures could also be
included at an additional cost. The preliminary concept plan for this alternative is
presented as Exhibit 2 of the attached report.
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\BS 1.doc 2 151
3. Combination of Turf and Pavement Parking Lot - Estimated Cost:
$309,210.00 (with engineered soil with fiber reinforcement: $462,500.00,
with filled cell pavement sections: $424,000)
This option would use the turf block in the parking stalls to facilitate drainage while
replacing the turf block within the drive isles and entries with asphalt concrete to
provide a better wearing surface. This alternative would also provide an option to
remove the turf block on the entire site and replace it with an engineered soil with
fiber reinforcement; or, City Council could choose to replace the existing turf block
with polyethylene grids which provide a much smaller exposed surface area and
allow more soil in order to grow turf. The preliminary concept plan for this
alternative is presented as Exhibit 3 of the attached report.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Consent to the use of $309,210 from RDA Project Area No. 1; select
Refurbishment Option Number 3 - Combination Turf and Pavement; direct
staff to obtain the necessary plans, specifications and engineer's estimate
from David Volz Design to install the proposed improvements to the Village
Parking Lot; and adopt a Resolution making certain findings pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a); or
2. Consent to the use of $434,780 from RDA Project Area No. 1; select
Refurbishment Option Number 2 - Conventional Parking Lot; direct staff to
obtain the necessary plans, specifications and engineer's estimate from
David Volz Design to install the proposed improvements to the Village
Parking Lot; and adopt a Resolution making certain findings Pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a); or
3. Consent to the use of $130,000 from RDA Project Area No. 1; select
Refurbishment Option Number 1 - Refurbish Existing Surface; direct staff to
obtain the necessary plans, specifications and engineer's estimate from
David Volz Design to install the proposed improvements to the Village
Parking Lot; and adopt a Resolution making certain findings Pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a); or
4. Provide staff with alternative direction.
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\BS 1.doc 3
Respectfully submitted,
1
4mothyy R. as , P.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. Village Parking Lot Evaluation
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\BS 1.doc
4 183
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) AND
CONSENTING TO THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE
REFURBISHMENT OF THE VILLAGE PARKING LOT
WHEREAS, on the 6th day of May, 2003, the La Quinta City Council (the
"City Council") approved the 2003-2004 Economic Development Plan which includes
implementation policies supporting enhancement of the Village commercial area;
WHEREAS, the City Council accepted the Phase VI -A, Village Commercial
Area Improvements, on October 1, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency participated in the funding of the
Phase VI -A Commercial Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Phase VI -A Improvements included the installation of turf
block and turf within the City -owned parking lot at the corner of Avenida Bermudas
and Avenida Montezuma; and
WHEREAS, the parking lot improvements are not performing as desired.
Continued vehicle traffic within the drive isles has led to over compaction of the turf
block cells preventing water from penetrating the soil; and
WHEREAS, new commercial development within the Village will increase
the parking demand and further exacerbate the problem; and
WHEREAS, there is inadequate funding within the City's General Fund or
from other sources to refurbish the Village Parking Lot; and
WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the public to refurbish the
Village Parking Lot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the La Quinta City Council as
follows:
SECTION 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are adopted
as the findings of the City Council.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes Agency funding to be
utilized for the refurbishment of the City -owned parking lot within the Village.
SECTION 3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a), the
City Council finds and determines that:
5 18
Resolution 2003-
Village Parking Lot
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 2
A. The refurbishment of the Village Parking Lot is of benefit to the Redevelopment
Agency Project Area Number 1.
B. No other reasonable means of financing the improvements are available to the
community.
C. The refurbishing the Village Parking Lot will assist in the elimination of one or
more blighting conditions inside the Project Area, including need for
improvement to the infrastructure within the Village commercial area, and is
consistent with the implementation plan adopted by the Agency pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33490.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta
City Council held on this 161h day of December, 2003, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta
185
0
ATTACHMENT 1
LA QUINTA
DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
March 24, 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. OVERVIEW/SUAR IARY
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS
C. LOPTIONS FOR REFURBISHMMT
Prepared by
7 .SG
Landscape Architects & Park Planners
A. OVERVIEW AND SUbMARY
I have reviewed the existing City parking lot at Avenedes Bermuda and Avenda
Montezuma. The original opened cell concrete block surface is not performing as
designed. The pavement is mostly flat and drivable, however the turf grass
planting in the open concrete cells pavement has for the most part not survived.
This type of installation requires regular maintenance, water management,
fertilization, etc. Also, it appears that all vehicles traverse the same route which
leads to over compaction in the main drive lanes. Taking measures to spread the
traffic, i.e. cones or signs, may lessen these compaction problems. If a high level
of maintenance was provided on site the original installation might have. been
more successful.
The options identified in this report provide alternatives for reestablishment of the
turf over much of the lot by different mechanical and structural means. There are
also suggestions of alternative development strategies to abandon some or all of
the grass lot, yet make a positive landscape impression at this comer while
maintaining the parking function.
Any of the alternatives listed below would work well to make this lot "greener".
The most straight forward alternatives involve paving of the drive isles and the
most used portions of the lot and reestablishment of the turf grass in the least used
parking areas.
B. EXISTING CONDTIONS
The P=isting parking lot is located on the north end of
)wn between commercial and retail developments
e city's newly renovated Park. It is adjacent to
3as Bermuda Street on the east, Aveneda Nararro on
st and Aveneda Montezuma on the south. To the
s a developed residential lot. The two acre lot is
dy flat with a slight slope to the northeast. There is
a bus stop located on Aveneda Bermudas Street
near the southeast comer of the lot.
The parking lot has two entry/exit points on the
east and west side. It has an open celled concrete
paver surface with some Bermuda grass growing in
the open cells. There are irrigation heads within
the. paved surface designed to provide water to the
ere La Quinta - 2 -
Downtown Parking Lot Study 8
grass. The lot is surrounded by concrete curbing and there are a few tree wells in
the middle of the lot, though there are no plantings in them or in the apparent
planting areas around the perimeter of the, lot between the curbs and the street
sidewalks/right of ways.
LOT SURFACE EVALUATION
The concrete pavers appear to be in good condition though some areas of
unevenness were noted on a recent site review. There were thin stands of
Bermuda noted in many of the open cell voids, however all Bermuda was absent
from the drive isle areas. The best stands of grass were noted in .the easterly,
lowest section of the parking lot and the south easterly comer where cars are often
parked during the day. One theory is that the soils in these areas have a higher
moisture due to collection of runoff or shade from the automobiles during some
daylight hours.
The soils in the open cells should be tested by an agricultural soils lab on an
annual basis to determine fertilization and maintenance program improvements.
C. OPTIONS FOR REFURBISHMENT
1. Refurbish Existing Surfacing
The refurbishment of the turf block and grass surface is feasible utilizing
any one of a number of remedies outlined below. A rescue of the existing
planting could be attempted but there will be more cost involved than
reseeding the turf. Compaction problems will have to be relieved by some
mechanical means. . The soils will need amending based upon a soils
report. Re-establishment of the grass may require some irrigation
modification and repair which will add to the refurbishment effort. The
turf grass in the drive isles has not been successful and modification of the
surface to a solid more conventional surface, i.e. concrete or asphalt,
should also be considered. See the Option 1 Exhibit for this proposed
layout.
2. Install Conventional Parking Lot
A solid pavement parking lot could be installed by removing the existing
surfacing and installing asphalt or concrete in its place. The new parking
lot could have planting spaces and surrounding landscape to soften the
look and reduce the heat gain on site. A preliminary concept plan for this
alternative is shown on the Option 2 Exhibit.
2a. New Lot with Shade Structures
Nvs La QWnta - - 3 -
Downtown Parking Lot Study S 3
9
This lot is located on an important piece of property in the downtown
district. There are opportunities to add to the character and vision of the
downtown through redeveloping this lot. Landscaping and edge
treatments would greatly improve -the aesthetic appeal of the lot.
The introduction of some architectural element could further add identity
to the downtown district. A design solution could include parking shade
structures resembling the city hall structures. The elements and plantings
might also borrow from the new park landscape and features located just
southwest of the site.
Preliminary ideas .for this solution could be developed to show a range of
options at this site. The type of development described could be as
extensive as the needs or the budget might dictate. A sample of what
might be a solution is shown on the Option 2 Exhibit.
3. Combination Turf and Pavement
A parking area made up of some portion of paved drive isles and some
paved stalls as well as some grass areas is possible. The most heavily
trafficked areas to the west could be all paved with the easterly stalls
having permeable surfaces. The open celled turf block could be
refurbished for the permeable pavement areas. Or some other permeable,
drivable, growing medium. could be installed. There are systems of soil
stabilization such as turf grids and fabric reinforced soils which would
allow for full turf coverage.
This combination of paved and unpaved could be designed to allow the
turf. grass portion to be a bio-filter area. , The hard surface runoff could be
drained to the turf areas. This would allow for some beneficial cleaning of
the runoff water. See Option 3 Exhibit for a possible layout of this
proposal.
As with the conventional pavement option, trees and shrubs could be
added to soften the appearance and provide some shade.
3a. Engineered Soil with Fiber Reinforcement
This alternative would involve removal of the turf block pavement
existing on the site and replacing this with a new soil based surface. The
drive isles are recommended to be paved with conventional concrete -or
asphalt. The remainder of the lot would receive 6" to 8" of an engineered
soil medium which contains reinforcing fibers. This special mix allows
for high load bearing applications, good soils drainage capabilities and is
not visible on the surface. One trade name for this type of product is
DVD La Quinta - 4 -
Downtown Parking Lot Study
10
Netlon which has been installed for overflow parking lots at many venues
around Southern California including Santa Anita Racetrack and the
Rosebowl.. Brochure is attached in the appendix section.
3b. Cell -filled Pavement Section Alternatives
Polyethylene grids (a recycled product) or several other cellular based
systems work similarly to the existing turf block. The differences is that
most of these alternatives have a much smaller exposed surface area once
installed, thereby allowing for more soil to grow turf grass. There is also
the advantage that the thermal heat gain in the existing cement block
system may have been contributing to the poor health of the existing turf.
Some of this heat problem will be reduced with a higher percentage of soil
material.
The material of this option will require removal of the existing turf block
and replacement with an open cell system. The cells could be made from
polyethylene or engineered fabrics. The fill material which provides
strength, is a small aggregate base material which is then topped with
some soil for turf grass installation. Even with this option the main isle
ways should receive conventional pavement. Literature on this option is
attached in the appendix section.
Order of Magnitude Budget Estimates
Parking lot size Estimated at 60,000s.f.
1. Refurbish Existing Conditions
Refurbish turf block installation
Including Irrigation System and the paving of
Parking Main Drive.
Budget Estimated Option 1
1. Refurbish and reinstall turf block
2. Refurbish irrigation system
3. Pave main drives (7,000 S.F)
4. Design Services and contingency (25%)
Estimated Cost Option 1
2.. Install Conventional Parking Lot
Estimate
$ 53,000
$ 10,000
$ 14,000
19,250
$ 96,250
Remove existing surface materials and install paved parking lot with interior
trees and perimeter plantings
ovs . La Quinta
Downtown Parking Lot Study
-5-
Budget Estimated Option 2 Es_
1. Demolition and removal $ 60,000
2. New pavement (asphalt 55,000 S Y) $1109000
3. Tree and shrub planting and irrigation (14,500 S.F.) $ 729500
4. New sidewalk (3,000 S.F.) $ 159000
5. Design Services and contingency (25%) 64,500
Estimated Cost Option 2 $3229000
2a: New lot with Shade Structures
Parking, shade structures, architectural
design elements, enhance plantings
and perimeter treatments
Budget Estimate4 Construction Cost Option 2c Estimate
1. All items listed in Option 2 above $322,000
2. Shade structures (8,800 S.F.) $2209000
Estimated Cost Option 2a $542,000
3. Combination Turf and Pavement
Pave drive isle and refurbish or
Replace turf block
Budget Estimated Option 3 Estimate
1. Demolition and Removal $ 60,000
2. New pavement (asphalt 14,500 S.F.) $ 299000
3. Refurbished turf block pavement (45,500 S.F.) $ 459,500
4. Tree and shrub planting (9,600 S.F.) $ 489000
5. Design Service and contingency (25%) 45,625
Estimated Cost Options 3 $228,125
Alternative Turf Pavement Options
3a. Engineered Soil with .fiber reinforcement
1. Demolition and Removal $ 601,000
2. New pavement(asphalt 14,500 S.F.) $ 29,000
3. Reinforced soils pavement $136,000
4. Tree and shrub planting (9,600 S.F.) $ 489500
5. Design Service and contingency (25%) 68,500
Estimated Cost Options 3a $3429500
®vb
La Quinta
Downtown Parking Lot Study
-6-
12
191
3b. Filled- Cell Pavement Section Alternatives
1. Demolition and Removal $ 601,000
2. New pavement (asphalt 14,500 S.F.) $ 29,000
3. Filled cell pavement (45,500 S.F.) $1139,750
4. Tree and shrub planting (9,600 S.F.) $ 48,500
5. Design Service and contingency (25%) 62,800
Estimated Cost Options 3b $314,050
®v0
La Quinta
Downtown Parking Lot Study
-7-
1390
141 193
6
• 2
El
N=
Q Rai
adIE
z c �-•
�CL tn 29 -C - '9'
CL
Pu •v
0.
0
i
sdonw838
oaadnrN � doiN�nv —
{
sVonnaas V
i
I
I � # Y
02l21V/l VN VOIN%V
fi
jo
l./ lJ
cu
4 44P aums
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Red Light Violation Sign
Installation
RECOMMENDATION:
As directed by City Council.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
None for this action. The cost of installing four of these signs at a typical intersection
would be approximately $600.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
As requested by City Council, the City Traffic Engineer has evaluated installing red
light violation signs as depicted in Attachment 1. The purpose of installing such signs
would be to deter drivers from running red traffic signal lights, thereby reducing the
potential for broadside collisions at signalized intersections.
There are a number of considerations regarding deployment of red light violation signs:
1. Although similar signs have been used to notify drivers of fines associated with
certain types of traffic violations, their effectiveness appears to be limited over
the long-term. The most commonly used sign is the one that notifies drivers of
the $271 violation for violating the requirements of High Occupancy Vehicle
Lanes (HOV) on freeways throughout Southern California. During peak traffic
congestion, these signs are frequently ignored because the California Highway
Patrol has provided very ' limited enforcement and the incentive for single
occupant drivers to use the lanes to reduce travel times is very strong during
periods of more severe traffic congestion.
19O
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\12-16-03\BS 10.doc
2. The red light violation signs could be deployed at the major gateways into the
City, such as Washington Street, or the approaches to signalized intersections
with the highest number of broadside collisions. It is anticipated that the impact
of these signs will be short lived unless the Police Department can provide
highly visible enforcement efforts. Placing orange flags on the signs could
improve their long term impact on driver behavior but the flags become a
maintenance problem as they are frequently stolen or damaged. The flags may
also be regarded as unsightly by local residents.
3. A number of cities in Southern California have recently installed automated
enforcement systems based on digital camera technology. The systems are a
turn -key type operation whereby vendors install all the equipment at their cost,
process the traffic tickets and collect the fines. A portion of the revenues are
retained by the vendors as a reimbursement for the upfront capital installation
costs.
For such a program to be successful and withstand legal challenges, signs have
to be installed at each intersection where the automated system is used
notifying drivers of the presence of red light cameras. The yellow signal
clearance intervals must meet minimum federal standards and the processing of
the traffic violation citations must be overseen by the Police Department. The
Institute of Transportation Engineers has recently published an informational
report on how automated enforcement programs should be properly
implemented should the City Council decide to embark on such a program.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Do not install red light violation signs; or
2. Install red light violation signs at major intersections along streets as
recommended by City Council; or
3. Deploy the red light violation signs as part of an automated enforcement
program; or
4. Provide staff with alternative direction.
2
Respectfully submitted,
imothy FGOona6kon, P.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Sample of Red Light Violation Sign
T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2003\12-16-03\BS 10.doc 3 198
ATTACHMENT 1
Red Light Violation Sign
T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2003\12-16-03\Red Light Violation Sign -doc
4
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE:
Consideration of Participation in the
Senior Inspiration Awards
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION: C9
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve the City of La Quinta's participation in the "Senior Inspiration Awards"
Program and the selection of Alice Bailes Bell as the City's nominee for the
program.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The "Senior Inspiration Awards" program is requesting the City purchase two tables
for ten people at the event for $2,500 which includes the contribution toward the
award for the recipient as provided in Attachment 1. The Community Services
Department budget contains a line item "Desert Senior Inspiration Awards,"
Account #101-202-609-000, which has $700 to sponsor this event. The
additional $1,800 for this program can be allocated from the Special Projects
Contingency Account #101-251-663-000, which has an uncommitted balance of
$3,000 as of this report.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The "Senior Inspiration Awards" program was formerly known as the "Living for
Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award program, and provides an opportunity to
recognize and honor outstanding seniors throughout the Coachella Valley.
As in the past, the "Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center" have selected a
recipient for City Council consideration.
Alice Bailes Bell has been nominated as an outstanding senior candidate who has
met the following criteria: the honoree should be at least 70 years old; reside in the
City of La Quinta; demonstrate involvement in community affairs for a lengthy
period of time; and personify a healthy and active attitude and lifestyle.
Attachment 2 provides a brief biography of Ms. Bailes Bell, which will be printed in
the program provided at the Senior Inspiration Luncheon to be held on March 31,
2004.
The cost increase for the program was determined at a CVAG meeting in June
2003, as noted in Attachment 1. The Regional Access Program, that administers
the program estimates $2,500 from each entity would provide the funds necessary
to host the event.
The City of La Quinta has sponsored this event since the program's inception in
1993.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve the City of La Quinta's participation in the "Senior Inspiration
Awards" program, appropriate $1,800 from the Special Projects Contingency
Account and the selection of Alice Bailes Bell as the City's nominee for the
program; or
2. Do not approve the City of La Quinta's participation in the "Senior Inspiration
Awards" program; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Dodie Horvitz, Co
unity Services Director
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Letter from Supervisor Roy Wilson Regarding the "Senior
Inspiration Awards"
2. Nomination Form: Alice Bailes Bell�� ,
,�;
12/05/2003 08:41 7608638905
SUPERVISOR WIL
RmR$IDE OFFICE:
4030 Lemon Stree414th Floor
Rtver3lde, C 92502-1647
(909) 955.1040
Fox (909) 955-2194
Mayor Don Adolph
City of La Quitnta
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
Dear Mayor Adolph:
Jft
of *a1ritt
SYJ PERVISOR ROY WILSON
FOURTH D2STwcT
November 18, 2003
ATTACHMENT
46-240 0%* Street, Ste. 318
]End:Io, CA 92201-5933
(760) N"211
Fax (760) 8634M
The County of Riverside and the nine incorporated cities of the Coachella Valley have started planning for
next year's Senior Inspiuration Awards. The luncheon will be held March 31, 2004 at the Hyatt Grand Cpions
Resort in ludian Wells. We eagerly look forward to another successful event in the tradition of prior years' successes.
Each City, s involvement in the selection process and participation in, the program is essential. At the Mayors
and City Managers meeting in June 2003, each city agreed to take on the sponsorship needed to continue this event. At
a subsequent meeting, the amount of city sponsorship was set at $2,500, We are counting on your participation to
make next year's event a great success. To this end, we are again asking each City to select one Individual man or
woman outstanding senior recipient who meets the following criteria:
Your honoree must be at least 70 years old;
Reside in your city;
Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time;
• Deserves to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for their service to the community;
a Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle
We ask that each city provide a brief summary (maximum 150 words) on why you (the City) chose that
person. ,A. nomination form is enclosed, and should be returned by Friday, January 9, 2004. This information will be
incorporated into the program, which will be distributed to all attendees at the Awards Luncheon.
The $2,500 City Sponsorship package includes two tables for 10 (total 20 guests), the city's contribution
toward the recipient's gdi listing in the event program, and recognition at the event. It is suggested that Table One
include your recipient and their one guest, City elected officials and/or staff; and Table Two for family members of
your recipient and/or additional city staff or other city guests. Checks should be made out to Senior Inspiration
Awards, and mailed to Nora Matlock, RAP Foundation, 42-600 Cook Street, Palm Desert, C,A. 92211. An invoice is
enclosed. We must receive your sponsorship check by January 9, 2004. We are also seeking corporate sponsors for this
event. ,A. letter has been enclosed for potential contributors of which you may be aware.
You may contact Lynda Kerney in zoy office at (760) 863-8211 should you require any fuu Cher information
about sponsorships or have any questions. We loop forward to your participation in this most unique tribute to our
seniors.
S - ly,
Roy Wilson
Fourth District Su 'sor
P.S. - .A. City may seek a sponsor for its financial commitment.
encl.
IrrMRNEr: dbb*t4@co.rivcX6ide ca.us n r,
11.14.03
Attn: Marilyn
ATTACHMENT 2
Here is ,the information you asked for.
I was born in Warren, Ohio on July 23, 1922.
Moved to California in August,1955.
Went to work for Bank of America in June,1956.
Managed the Avalon Branch of Marina Federal Savings & Loan, Catalina Island
I transferred from the Paso Robles, Crocker National Bank, to open the Bank's Indian
Wells escrow office in Dec.,1978. While there I processed the escrow for sale of land
on Washington to the Catholic Diocese (the site of St. Francis of Assisi.)
From 1980 to 1986, I was a contributing writer to the Indio Daily News. This included
LQ city council meetings as well as personality profiles for the newspaper.
In 1980 I published Ryme and Thought, my first book of poetry and established The
Marcella Press to publish - my -own work with -intent to build -it -into- a biographical
publishing company. I operated part time from my home.
In 1981, the Bank wanted to restructure and closed the Indian Wells Escrow Office.
They offered me a transfer to Palm Springs Office escrow department.. I declined.
In 1983 I opened The Marcella Press office on Calle Estado.
When Larry Allen became Mayor he asked me if I would organize a Historical Society
for the City. I agreed. I was elected its first president.
Presently I am a Life Member of the La Quinta Historical Society, a member of the
Chamber of Commerce, Senior Center, and Niner's Golf Club.
List of Awards:
Student member of the National Honor Society
Essay contest -ninth annual National Eisteddfod Contest
Crocker National Bank State Speech Contest
Listed in: Who's Who of California
Who's Who of California Executive Women
The International Who's Who of Intellectuals
Elected into the International Poetry Hall of Fame
La Quinta Historical Society named its student literary contest Alice Bailes Bell
Literary contest
I was the producer & camera person for the TV Video The Rolling Sculpture
Presented The Paul Harris Fellow Award by the La Quinta Rotary Club.
Books published :
Ryme and Thought
La Quinta Historical Society Literary Contest 2000 (This was one of the few
student contest books that has been copyrighted.)
Chalice of Thought
I have two children, Roger and Faith, two grandsons, a great grandson, and great
granddaughter.
#Alice
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Adoption of a
Resolution Setting the Time and Place for a Joint
Public Hearing on the La Quinta Redevelopment
Project No. 2 Redevelopment Plan Amendment
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council that establishes the time and place for a
joint public hearing with the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency regarding the
proposed Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment
Project No. 2.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
In July of this year, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency initiated an Amendment
to the Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 2. The
purpose was to increase the cumulative tax increment limit from the current
$400,000,000 to $1,500,000,000. Revenue projections indicate that the existing
revenue limit will be achieved approximately 20 years prior to the expiration of
Project No. 2. This would severely impact the Agency's ability to repay
outstanding bonds and loans. The documents required to process the Amendment
have been processed through the Planning Commission and taxing agencies. Prior
to final consideration of the Amendment, the California Redevelopment Law
-:.I
toy+ i1
requires that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency hold a public hearing to
receive testimony both for and against the Amendment. The attached resolution
establishes January 20, 2004 as the time for the public hearing. In order to
answer questions and surface community concerns, staff will be holding a
community meeting on Wednesday evening, January 7, 2004.
To date, the Agency has reviewed and approved a Preliminary Plan and Preliminary
Report that outline the reasons for this Amendment. Further, the Planning
Commission reviewed and approved the Preliminary Plan, on September 9, 2003,
and on December 9, 2003, voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
Amendment.
In 1989 the City Council approved La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 2, which
generally encompasses properties between Washington Street and Jefferson
Street, from Avenue 50 to the north City limits. The purpose was to stimulate
economic development through primarily funding street and drainage
improvements, and to assist the City of La Quinta with achieving its housing
mandates through funding affordable housing projects and programs. When Project
No. 2 was established, a limit was included on the total amount- of tax increment
revenue the Agency may receive from Project Area No. 2. Financial projections
were prepared that assumed average annual property value growth of 5 % during
the 50-year term of the Redevelopment Plan. Based upon these projections, a
$400,000,000 tax increment revenue limit was established. Growth, however,
exceeded this forecasted rate and tax increment revenue projections indicate that
the $400,000,000 tax increment limit will be achieved by fiscal 2020-21, or
earlier, if annual growth exceeds 3% per annum.
Reaching the tax increment limit impacts Project No. 2 in the following ways:
• The term of the Redevelopment Plan runs until May 2039. If the tax
increment limit is reached before then, the Agency must cease all non -
housing redevelopment activities in Project Area No. 2, including repaying
outstanding General Fund loans.
• Project No. 2 has two outstanding bond debt obligations: the 1995 Housing
Bonds of which it is scheduled to fund 21.3 % of annual debt service
payments until fiscal year 2025-26, and the 1998 non -housing bonds of
which it is scheduled to fund 100% of annual debt service payments until
2033. These bonds must be repaid and if the tax increment limit is not
increased, then the Agency must establish a sinking fund starting in 2014 to
retire these bonds. All non -housing revenue would be encumbered for this
purpose leaving no funds to repay City General Fund loan obligations.
• The Agency cannot issue new housing bonds that pledge Project No. 2
housing fund revenue. This would severely impair the Agency's ability to
meet its affordable housing obligations. Project No. 2 has the projected
capacity to support an additional $57.0 million of housing bonds during the
remaining term of the Redevelopment Plan.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City of La Quinta that establishes the time and
place for a joint public hearing with the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
regarding the proposed Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta
Redevelopment Project No. 2; or
2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City of La Quinta that establishes the time
and place for a joint public hearing with the La Quinta Redevelopment
Agency regarding the proposed Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for
La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 2; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
r--
erry D. erman, Community
levelopment Director
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE TIME AND
PLACE FOR A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE LA
QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGARDING THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2
WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency"), is a
redevelopment agency (a public body, corporate and politic) duly created, established
and authorized to transact business and exercise its powers, all under and pursuant to
the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 of Division 24 (commencing with Section
33000 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California); and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 2
("Redevelopment Plan") was adopted on May 16, 1989 by Ordinance No. 139 of the
City of La Quinta ("City"), which established a redevelopment project known and
designated as La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 2 ("Project No. 2"); and
WHEREAS, the Agency desires to consider an amendment to the Redevelopment
Plan that increases the limitation on the number of dollars to be allocated to the
Agency from Project No. 2; said amendment would not modify the boundaries of
Project No. 2; and
WHEREAS, Section 33355 of the Community Redevelopment Law authorizes a
joint public hearing on the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan with the consent of
the City Council of the City of La Quinta and the Agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, ORDER AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Each of the above recitals is true and correct and this Council so finds and
determines.
2. The City Council hereby consents to holding a joint public hearing with
the Agency on January 20, 2004 at 7:00 p.m., or shortly thereafter, in the City
Council chambers, for the purpose of considering an amendment of the Redevelopment
Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 2.
3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the
joint public hearing in the form and manner required by the Community Redevelopment
Law.
4
Resolution 2003-
Redevelopment Plan Amendment Joint Hearing
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 2003, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Don Adolph, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\BS7 (cc) reso.doc
5
Resolution 2003-
Redevelopment Plan Amendment Joint Hearing
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 3
CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
RE: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)Ss.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at a regular
meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of December, 2003.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC City Clerk
City of La Quinta
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)Ss.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. RA
of said City Council and that said Resolution was adopted at the time and
by the vote stated on the above certificate, and has not been amended or repealed.
Dated: , 2003
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC City Clerk
City of La Quinta
(SEAL)
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONMBS7 (cc) reso.doc 6
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of an Amendment to the
Memorandum of Understanding on the Coachella STUDY SESSION:
Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan PUBLIC HEARING:
Regarding "Measures to Minimize and Mitigate Take
of the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard" to
Provide an Extension of the Current MOU until March
15, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Amendment and authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary documents.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The extension will continue the City's collection of $600 per acre for the preserve.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
In spring of 2001, CVAG, its member cities, and the County of Riverside entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Fish and
Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) which amended the
Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan and had an expiration
date of September 1, 2002. A subsequent Amendment extended the MOU and its
assurance from the FWS that the permit for "take" of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed
Lizard would not be suspended or revoked until December 31, 2003. This extension
until March 15, 2005 will continue the assurance that no action will be taken,
providing regulatory certainty to developers and local governments while the Coachella
Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("CVMSHCP") is completed. It is
anticipated the CVMSHCP will be completed by the end of 2004. For a jurisdiction to
be a party to this extension, it must execute the Amendment by
December 31, 2003. The matter is before the City Council for their consideration.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve the Amendment and authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary
documents; or
2. Do not approve the Amendment nor authorize the Mayor to sign the
necessary documents; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
.tor
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachment: 1. Amendment to the MOU
`AV L 2
r�
ATTACHMENT MI
October 24, 2003
AMENDMENT TO
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Among
THE CITIES OF CATHEDRAL CITY, COACHELLA,
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, INDIAN .WELLS, INDIO, LA QUINTA,
PALM DESERT, PALM SPRINGS, AND RANCHO MIRAGE;
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; THE COACHELLA VALLEY
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS; THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME; THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; AND
CENTER FOR NATURAL LANDS MANAGEMENT
Regarding
MEASURES TO MINIMIZE AND MITIGATE TAKE OF THE
. COACHELLA VALLEY FRINGE -TOED LIZARD
1. AMENDMENT OF PRIOR MOU:
As to the rights and obligations of the signatories hereto, the Memorandum of Understanding
Regarding Measures to Minimize and Mitigate Take of the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard
(MOU) previously executed by the Parties on or about May 30, 2001 is hereby amended.
II. EXTENSION OF TERM OF MOU:
The term of the MOU, as it applies to the signatories hereto, is extended to, and shall expire on,
March 15, 2005 or upon issuance by FWS and CDFG of take authorizations for the MSHCP,
whichever occurs first. The extension of the term of the MOU shall be applicable only as to those
jurisdictions that execute this amendment on or before December 31, 2003.
r) I r.+ 3
4. 40
0
III. MISCELLANEOUS:
A. All other terms and conditions of the MOU shall remain in full force and effect.
B. As used herein, the term "jurisdiction" refers to the Cities and County that were parties to
the MOU.
C. The terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the MOU.
DATED
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
CITY OF CATHEDRAL. CITY
I:
CITY OF COACHELLA
LM
CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS
CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
I0
4
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
CITY OF INDIO
By
CITY OF LA QUINTA
By
CITY OF PALM DESERT
By
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
By
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
By
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS
By
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
DATED:
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND
GAME
By
U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
By
CENTER FOR NATURAL LANDS
MANAGEMENT
By
�: 6
...... Sep
5
of �9w
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE:
Consideration of Interview Schedule for Golf Course
Management Firms for SilverRock Ranch
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Select a "short list" of golf course management firms for SilverRock Ranch and identify
potential interview dates.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None for this action.
Pursuant to the Consultant Selection Process, cost proposals from the interviewing
firms were opened after the Committee had ranked the firms. Proposed fees varied,
but generally ranged from $5',000 to $10,000 per month plus, in many cases, a
percentage fee on revenue generated at the course.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
The City Charter and its principles of "home rule" allow the City sufficient flexibility to
undertake economic development activities such as SilverRock Ranch.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The City Council authorized distribution of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Golf
Course Management Services and identified a Consultant Selection Committee at its
November 4, 2003, meeting. The RFP outlined desired services including pre -opening
tasks to monitor construction and supervise "grow -in" and, after opening, day-to-day
maintenance and operational services. The City Council requested that the Committee
bring forward two to four firms for Council interview and final selection.
�1u
The RFP was distributed to a list of interested firms, advertised in the Desert Sun, and
made available on the project website. The City received twelve proposals, which are
available for review in the City Clerk's Office:
■ Arnold Palmer Golf Management
■ Cavner-Cook Golf Management
■ Donovan Brothers Golf
■ JC Resorts
■ Kemper Sports
■ Landmark Golf Management
■ Michael McGinnis
■ OB Sports
■ One Source
■ Troon Golf
■ ValleyCrest & ES Partners
■ Western Golf
The Consultant Review Committee ranked the submittals and invited seven firms to
interview with the Committee:
■ Arnold Palmer Golf Management
■ JC Resorts
■ Kemper Sports
■ Landmark Golf Management
■ OB Sports
■ Troon Golf
■ Western Golf
Interviews were conducted with six firms (Kemper Sports withdrew) on Thursday,
December 4, 2003. Subsequent to the interviews, the Committee ranked the firms
and recommended three for interview with the City Council:
■ Troon Golf
■ OB Sports
■ Landmark Golf Management
Staff recommends that the City Council select a date and schedule interviews with
Troon Golf, OB Sports, and Landmark Golf Management.
2
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Authorize staff to invite selected golf course management firms to interview
before the City Council on a specified date; or
2. Do not authorize staff to invite selected golf course management firms to
interview; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
21� 3
LOP
OF T1�9ti'
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of City Council Reorganization,
BUSINESS SESSION: 1
Selection of Mayor Pro Tern to Serve a Term as Provided CONSENT CALENDAR:
by Resolution No. 98-109
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Select a Mayor Pro Tern to serve a term as provided by Resolution No. 98-109.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The provisions set forth on Page 6 of Resolution No. 98-109, (Attachment 1) require
that in accordance with Government Code Section 36801, the Council shall meet on
the Tuesday after each General Municipal Election and choose one of its members as
Mayor Pro Tempore. Each selection shall be by three or more affirmative votes, and a
failure to achieve such total of affirmative votes shall be deemed a selection of the
incumbent to remain in office. Each person so selected shall serve until a successor is
chosen (at any time) by three or more affirmative votes provided, however, that the
office of Mayor Pro Tempore shall automatically be reconsidered by the Council in each
odd numbered year.
010
Council Member Stanley Sniff was selected by the Council to serve as Mayor Pro Tern
in December of 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Select a Mayor Pro Tern to serve a term as provided by Resolution No. 98-109;
or
2. Do not select a Mayor Pro Tern to serve a term as provided by Resolution No.
98-109; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
June S. breek, CIVIC
City Clerk
Approved for submission by:
LNI V
Q-..�►�,
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 98-109
2
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-109
1
i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS AND
RELATED FUNCTIONS AND ACTIVITIES.
WHEREAS, Section 2.04.040 of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code
requires that the City Council adopt Rules of Procedure to govern the conduct of its
meetings and any of its other functions and activities, and regulations pertaining
thereto;
WHEREAS, this resolution supersedes City Council Resolutions No. 93-95, No.
95-30, No. 96-26, No. 97-79, and No. 98-68A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La
Quinta that Rules of Procedure for City Council meetings and related functions and
activities are hereby adopted, to read, as follows:
PURPOSE: The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the within
rules shall be to provide directory guidelines relating to the conduct
of the public business by or on behalf of the City Council, and in
the event of any noncompliance with or violation of any provision
herein, such will not be deemed to affect the validity of any action
taken, unless otherwise specifically provided by law.
1.1 REGULAR MEETINGS:
The City Council of the City of La Quinta shall hold regular meetings in the place
specified in the Municipal Code, on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 2:00
p.m. with public hearings being scheduled for 7:00 p.m. When the day for a regular
meeting of the Council falls on a legal holiday, no meeting shall be held on that day;
rather, such . meeting shall be held at the same hour on the 'next succeeding day
thereafter that is not a holiday.
1.2 ADJOURNED MEETINGS:
Any meeting may be adjourned to a time, place, and date certain, but not
beyond the next regular meeting. Once adjourned, the meeting may not be
reconvened.
r 3
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 2
1.3 SPECIAL MEETINGS:
Special Meetings may be called by the Mayor or majority of Council Members
on 24-hour notice, as set forth in Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State
of California. Only matters contained in the notice may be considered and no
ordinances (other than urgency ordinances) may be adopted. Notice of ' special
meetings shall be posted in accordance with Section 1.4.
1.4 NOTICE OF MEETINGS. POSTING OF AGENDAS:
The City Clerk, or designee, shall post a meeting agenda in the following three
locations at least 72 hours before each regular meeting of the City Council, to wit:
(1) the bulletin board in front of the Civic Center; (2) on a public bulletin board located
at Albertson's Supermarket on Highway 1 11; and (3) the Chamber of Commerce
Village office. The City Council finds and determines that all locations are freely
accessible to the public and the Council further finds and determines that the City is
legally required to post an agenda only at the Civic Center location and this direction
to post in all locations is directory only and not mandatory. Following posting of said
agenda, the City Clerk or designee, shall sign a declaration of the date and place of the
posting of the said agenda and shall retain said declaration of posting as a public
record as part of the Council meeting record to which the posting relates. The
provisions of this section as to place of posting and declaration of posting shall also
apply to the special meeting posting requirements of Government Code 54956. To the
extent not required by State law, the provisions hereof are directory only.
1.5 QUORUM:
Unless otherwise provided for in the Municipal Code, a majority of the Council
shall be sufficient to do business and motions may be passed 2-1 if only 3 attend. The
following matters, however, require three affirmative votes: (a) adoption of
ordinances, (b) resolutions granting franchises, and. (c) orders for payment of money.
If a majority of the Council shall be disqualified to vote on a matter by reason
of actual or apparent conflict of interest, the Council shall select by lot or other means
of random selection, or by such other impartial and equitable means as the Council
shall determine, that number of its disqualified members which, when added to the
members eligible to vote, shall constitute a quorum.
r
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 3
1.6 MEETINGS TO BE PUBLIC:
Study Sessions and all regular, adjourned or special meetings of the City Council
shall be open to the public, provided, however, the Council may hold closed sessions
from which the public may be excluded, which closed sessions shall only be held in
accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act (Government Code 54950 etc.).
1.7 CLOSED SESSION MINUTES:
Pursuant to Section.54957.2 of the California Government Code, the City Clerk
of the City of La Quinta may be required to attend closed session of the City Council
and keep and enter in a minute book a record of topics discussed and decisions made
at each meeting. The confidentiality of such minutes shall be maintained pursuant to
the Government Code.
2.1 AGENDA:
The Order of Business of each meeting shall be as contained in the Agenda
prepared by the City Clerk. The Agenda shall be a listing by topic of the subjects
which shall be taken up for consideration in the following order:
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
*PUBLIC COMMENT
CLOSED SESSION
*PUBLIC COMMENT
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
ANNOUNCEMENTS
PRESENTATIONS
*WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
CONSENT CALENDAR
BUSINESS SESSION
*STUDY SESSION
*REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
*DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
5
;3
Resolution No. 98-109
1016/98
Page 4
order.
*MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ITEMS
*PUBLIC COMMENT
PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ADJOURNMENT
Except with majority consent of the Council, items may not be taken out of
* These portions of the agenda shall be used for discussion and direction to
staff to bring back an item with or without additional information or clarification
for final consideration as a business, consent calendar or public hearing item on
a future agenda. Alternatively, direction could be given to bring back an item for
further discussion on a future agenda in any of these highlighted portions of the
agenda.
2.2 DELIVERY OF AGENDA:
Barring insurmountable difficulties, the Agenda shall ordinarily be delivered to
Council Members each Friday preceding the Tuesday meeting to which it pertains.
The Agenda shall also be available to the general public at the time it is delivered
to the City Council.
2.3 ROLL CALL:
Before proceeding with the business of the- Council, the City Clerk shall call the
roll of the Council Members and the names of those present shall be entered in the
minutes. The order of roll call shall be alphabetical with the Mayor called last.
2.4 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Unless requested by a majority of the City Council, minutes of the previous
meeting may be approved without public reading if the clerk has previously furnished
each Council Member with a copy thereof.
2.5 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Generally, public hearings shall be conducted in the following order:
Hearing opened by Presiding Officer
Staff presentation
Questions of Staff by Council
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 5
Public testimony opened by Presiding Officer
Public testimony
Hearing closed
Questions by Council
Discussion by Council
Action by Council
Questions or comments from the public shall be limited to the subject under
consideration. Depending upon the extent of the agenda, and the number of persons
desiring to speak on an issue, the Presiding Officer may, at the beginning of the
hearing, limit testimony, but in no event to less than 3 minutes per individual. Any
person may speak for a longer period of time, upon approval of the City Council, when
this is deemed necessary in such cases as when a person is speaking as a
representative of a group or has graphic or slide presentations requiring more time.
Quasi-judicial hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the principles of due
process, and the City Attorney shall advise the City Council in this regard.
2.6 PUBLIC COMMENT:
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.3, each agenda for a regular meeting shall
provide, an item entitled "Public Comment". The purpose of such item shall be to
provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the City Council
on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the
City Council. In order to assure that the intent of Government Code 54954.3 is
carried out, three (3) minutes is the amount of time allocated for each individual
speaker.
Government Code 54954.2 provides that no action shall be taken on any item
not appearing on the agenda unless the action is authorized by Government Code
54954.2 (b). On items of public comment or discussion, any matter raised by the
public which does not specifically appear on the agenda shall, upon direction of any
Council Member, be automatically referred to the staff or placed on the next meeting's
agenda. It is hereby determined that such requests or direction by a Council Member
shall not be considered action taken by the Council on said item raised by the public.
Further, Council discussion of the matter shall not be considered action taken.
2.7 CONSENT AGENDA:
Items of routine nature, and non -controversial, shall be placed on the consent
agenda. All items may be approved by one blanket motion upon unanimous consent.
7 0 .1
M-
�ti�a
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 6
Prior to, or following review of the consent agenda by the City Manager, any Council
Member may request that any item be withdrawn from the consent agenda for
separate consideration. However, any Council Member may abstain from voting on
any consent agenda, and the City Clerk shall be instructed to record such abstentions
in the minutes.
• : • • •T4
3.1 PRESIDING OFFICER:
The Mayor shall be the Presiding Officer at all meetings of the Council. In the
absence of the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall preside. In the absence of both
the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tempore, the senior Council Member shall preside. If
there are two Council Members with equal seniority, then the one who received the
highest number of votes in the election shall be the Presiding Officer.
In accordance with Government Code Section 36801, the Council shall meet on
the Tuesday after each general municipal election and choose one of its members as
Mayor Pro Tempore. Each selection shall be by three or more affirmative votes, and
a failure to achieve such total of affirmative votes, shall be deemed a selection of the
incumbent(s) to remain in office. Each person so selected shall serve until a successor
is chosen (at any time) by three or more affirmative votes, provided that at the second
regular meeting in November of each odd numbered year, the office of Mayor Pro
Tempore shall automatically be reconsidered by the Council.
3.2 CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting of the Council shall be called to order by the Mayor, or in his/her
absence, by the Mayor Pro Tempore. In the absence of both the Mayor and the Mayor
Pro Tempore, the meeting shall be called to order by the senior Council Member as
determined in Section 3.1, who shall serve as Presiding Officer.
3.3 PARTICIPATION OF PRESIDING OFFICER:
The Presiding Officer may move, second, and debate from the Chair, subject
only to such limitations of debate as are imposed on all Council Members, and he shall
not be deprived of any of the rights and privileges of a Council Member by reason of
his acting as Presiding Officer. However, the Presiding Officer is primarily responsible
for the conduct of the meeting. If he desires to personally engage in extended debate
on questions before the Council, he should consider turning the Chair over to another
member.
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 7
3.4 QUESTION TO BE STATED:
The Presiding Officer shall verbally restate each question immediately prior to
calling for the vote. Following the vote the Presiding Officer shall verbally announce
whether the question carried or was defeated. The Presiding Officer may also publicly
state the effect of the vote for the benefit of the audience before proceeding to the
next item of business.
3.5 SIGNING OF DOCUMENTS:
The Mayor, or Mayor Pro Tempore, or Acting Presiding Officer, in the absence
of the Mayor, shall sign ordinances adopted by the City Council. - The City Clerk, or
Deputy City Clerk, shall attest to the signature of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tempore, or
the Acting Presiding Officer.
3.6 MAINTENANCE OF ORDER:
The Mayor or Presiding Officer is responsible for the maintenance of order and
decorum at -all times. No person is allowed to speak who has not first been. recognized
by the Chair. All questions and remarks shall be addressed to the Chair.
6i 1L A1N 6 _
4.1 POINTS OF ORDER:
The Presiding Officer shall determine all Points of Order subject to the right of
any member to appeal to the Council. If any appeal is taken, the question shall be,
"Shall the decision of the Presiding Officer be sustained?" in which event a majority
vote shall govern and conclusively determine such question of order.
4.2 DECORUM AND ORDER - COUNCIL MEMBERS:
(a) Any Council Member desiring to speak shall address the Chair and, upon
recognition by the Presiding Officer, shall confine himself to the question under debate.
(b) A Council Member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted while
speaking unless called to order by the Presiding Officer; unless a Point of Order is.
raised by another Council Member; or unless the speaker chooses to yield to questions
from another Council Member.
8
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 8
(c) Any Council Member called to order while he is speaking shall cease
speaking immediately until the question of order is determined. If ruled to be in order,
he shall be permitted to proceed. If ruled to be not in order, he shall remain silent or
shall alter his remarks so as to comply with rules of the Council.
(d) Council Members shall accord the utmost courtesy to each other, to city
employees, and to the public appearing before the Council and shall refrain at all times
from rude and derogatory remarks, reflections as to integrity, abusive comments and
statements as to motives and personalities.
(e) Any Council Member may move to require the Presiding Officer to enforce
the rules and the affirmative vote of a majority of the Council shall require him to so
act.
(f) Except where specifically authorized by City Council action or for purely
ceremonial purposes, no Council Member attending a City commission or committee
meeting shall make any statement or give the appearance or indicate in any way that
he or she is representing the City. When making a comment at such a meeting, the
Council Member should make it clear that he or she is speaking solely as an individual.
Unless officially appointed to participate on a committee, Council Members should
make an effort not to insert themselves into or take positions on matters which will
or are likely to be the subject of public hearings or will be decided upon by the City
Council after considering the entire issue.
4.3 DECORUM AND ORDER - EMPLOYEES:
Members of the administrative staff and employees of the City shall observe the
same rules of procedure and decorum applicable to members of the Council. The City
Manager shall ensure that all City employees observe such decorum. Any staff
members, including the City Manager, desiring to address the Council or members of
the public shall first be recognized by the Chair. All remarks shall be addressed to the
Chair and not to any one individual Council Member or member of the public.
4.4 DECORUM AND ORDER - PUBLIC:
Members of the public attending Council meetings shall observe the same rules
of order and decorum applicable to the Council. Any person making impertinent and
slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Council or while
attending the Council meeting shall be removed from the room if the sergeant -of -arms
is so directed by the Presiding Officer, and such person may be barred from further
audience before the Council.
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 9
Unauthorized remarks from the audience, stamping of feet, whistles, yells and similar
demonstrations shall not be permitted by the Presiding Officer, who may direct the
sergeant -of -arms to remove such offenders from the room. Aggravated cases shall be
prosecuted on appropriate complaint signed by the Presiding Officer.
4.5 ENFORCEMENT OF DECORUM:
The head of the City's police agency or designee shall be ex-officio sergeant -of -
arms of the Council. He shall carry out all orders and instructions given him by the
Presiding Officer for the purpose of maintaining order and decorum in the Council
Chambers. Upon instructions from the Presiding Officer, it shall be the duty of the
sergeant -of -arms or his representative to eject any person from the Council Chambers
or place him under arrest or both.
As set forth in Government Code Section 54957.9, in the event that any
meeting is willfully interrupted by a group or groups of persons so as to render the
orderly conduct of such meeting unfeasible and order cannot be restored by the
removal of individuals who are willfully interrupting the meeting, the members of the
Council may, order the meeting room cleared and continue in session. Only matters
appearing on the agenda may be considered in such a session. Duly accredited
representatives of the press or other news..media, except those participating in t-he
disturbance, shall be allowed to attend any session held pursuant to this section.
Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Council from establishing a procedure for
readmitting an individual or individuals not responsible for willfully disturbing the
orderly conduct of the meeting.
4.6 PERSONAL PRIVILEGE:
The right of a member to address the Counc.i.l on a question of personal privilege
shall be limited to cases in which his integrity, character, or motives are assailed,
questioned or impugned.
4.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
All Council Members are subject to the provisions of California Law, such as
Chapter 7, Title 9, of the California Government Code, relative to conflicts of interest,
and to conflicts of interest codes adopted by the Council. Any Council Member
prevented from voting because of a conflict of interest shall refrain from debate and
voting and will be considered absent. Such Council Member may choose to leave the
Council Chamber during debate and voting on the issue.
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 10
4.8 LIMITATION OF DEBATE:
No Council Member normally should speak more than once upon any one subject
until every other member choosing to speak thereon has spoken. No member shall
speak for a longer time than five minutes each time he has the floor, without approval
of a majority vote of the Council.
4.9 DISSENTS AND PROTESTS:
Any member shall have the right to express dissent from or protest to any action
of the Council and have the reason entered in the minutes. If such dissent or protest
is desired to be entered in the minutes, this should be made clear by language such as,
"I would like the minutes to show that I am opposed to this action for the following
reasons ... if
4.10 PROCEDURES IN ABSENCE OF RULES:
In the absence of a rule herein to govern a point or procedure, Robert's Rules
of Order, Newly Revised, shall be used as a guide.
4.11 RULINGS OF CHAIR FINAL UNLESS OVERRULED:
In presiding over Council meetings, the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tempore or temporary
Presiding Officer shall decide all questions of interpretation of these rules, points of
order or other questions of procedure requiring rulings. Any such decision or ruling
shall be final unless overridden or suspended by a majority vote of the Council
Members present and voting.
�iI 10 LCA I ■1 *8161110
5.1 MANNER OF ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL:
Any member of the public desiring to address the Council shall proceed to the
podium and wait to be recognized by the Presiding Officer. After being recognized,
he shall state his name and address for the record.
All remarks and questions shall be addressed to the Chair and not to any
individual Council Member, staff member or other person. During a public hearing, all
remarks shall be limited to the subject under consideration. No person shall enter into
any discussion without being recognized by the Presiding Officer.
12
40 ! j
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 11
5.2 TIME LIMITATION:.
For time limitation applicable to public hearings and public comment, see
Sections 2.5 and 2.6.
5.3 ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL AFTER MOTION IS MADE:
After a motion has been made, or after a public hearing has been closed, no
member of the public shall address the Council without first securing permission by a
majority vote of the Council.
5.4 LIMITATIONS REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REPORTS:
The making of oral communications to the Council by any member of the public
during the "Public Comments" portion of the agenda shall be subject to the following
limitations:
At any time, before or after the oral communication is commenced, the Presiding
Officer may if he deems it preferable, direct that the communication be made instead
either to the City Manager or other appropriate staff member during regular business
hours, or in writing for subsequent submittal to Council Members.
5'.5 PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO BE WITHIN PLATFORM:
No person except City Officials shall be permitted behind the City Council dais
without permission or consent of the Presiding Officer.
6.1 PROCESSING OF MOTIONS:
When a motion is made and seconded, it shall be stated by the Presiding Officer
before debate. A motion so stated shall not be withdrawn by the mover without the
consent of the person seconding it.
6.2 MOTIONS OUT OF ORDER:
The Presiding Officer may at any time, by majority consent of the Council,
permit a member to introduce an ordinance, resolution, or motion out of the regular
agenda order.
13
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 12
6.3 DIVISION OF QUESTION:
If the question contains two or more divisional propositions, the Presiding
Officer may, and upon request of a member shall (unless appealed), divide the same.
6.4 PROCEDURE OF MOTIONS:
When a motion is before the Council, no motion shall be entertained except the
following, which shall have precedence in the following order:
(a)
Adjourn
(b)
Fix hour of adjournment
(c)
Table
(d)
Limit or terminate discussion
(e)
Amend
(f)
Postpone
6.5 MOTION TO ADJOURN: (not debatable)
A motion to adjourn shall be in order at any time, except as follows:
(a) When repeated without intervening business or discussion.
(b) When made as an interruption of a member while speaking.
(c) When discussion has been ended, and vote on motion is pending, and
(d) While a vote is being taken.
6.6 MOTION TO FIX HOUR OF ADJOURNMENT:
Such a motion shall be to set a definite time at which to adjourn and shall be
debatable and shall be amendable by unanimous vote.
6.7 MOTION TO TABLE:
A motion to table shall be used to temporarily by-pass the subject. A motion
to table shall be undebatable and shall preclude all amendments or debate of the
subject under consideration. If the motion shall prevail, the matter may be "taken from
the table" at any time prior to the end of the next regular meeting.
14
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 13
6.8 MOTION TO LIMIT OR TERMINATE DISCUSSION:
Such a motion shall be used to limit or close debate on, or further amendment
to, the main motion and shall be undebatable. If the motion fails, debate shall be
reopened; if the motion passes, a vote shall be taken on the main motion.
6.9 MOTION TO AMEND:
A motion to amend shall be discussed only as to the amendment. A motion to
amend an amendment is possible but no additional motions to further amendments
may be made. Any amendment shall relate to the original motion and not introduce
a different matter. Amendments shall be voted first, then the main motion as
amended. Alternatively, the original maker of the main motion may agree to revise the
original motion and if the second agrees to second the revised motion, the Council may
vote on the main motion as revised.
7.1 VOTING PROCEDURE:
In acting upon every motion, the vote shall be taken by electronic voting. In the
event the electronic voting machine is not functioning, the vote shall be taken by roll
call. The vote on each motion shall then be entered in full upon the record. The order
of voting shall be alphabetical with the Mayor voting last. The Clerk shall call the
names of all members seated when a roll call vote is ordered or required. Members
shall respond 'aye', 'no' or 'abstain .
Every ordinance and any resolutions or orders for franchises or payments of
money require three affirmative votes. Any member may change his vote before the
next order of business.
7.2 FAILURE TO VOTE:
A Council Member who abstains due to reasons of conflict shall, for purpose
of the item under consideration, be considered as if absent. A Council Member
abstaining for reasons other than conflict shall, be counted as present for purposes of
a quorum and such abstentions are counted with the majority. A Council Member who
leaves the dais solely to avoid participating in a specific item shall, in absence of a
conflict, be counted as if they were present but abstaining and such abstentions are
also counted with the majority.
15
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 14
7.3 RECONSIDERATION:
Any Council Member who voted with the majority may move a reconsideration
of any action at the same meeting or, within seven (7) calendar days, request to the
City Manager or City Clerk that it be agendized for consideration at the following
meeting. If the seventh calendar day falls on a holiday, then the deadline shall be the
next business day. If the motion to reconsider passes then the original item may be
reconsidered at that time or agendized for the next meeting which meets any
applicable noticing requirements. After a motion for reconsideration has once been
acted upon, no other motion for a reconsideration thereof shall be made without
unanimous consent of the Council.
7.4 TIE VOTES:
Tie Votes shall be lost motions unless an additional motion is made which
obtains a majority vote to break the tie. When all Council Members are present, a tie
vote on whether to grant an appeal from official action shall be considered a denial of
such appeal. If a tie vote results at a time when less than all members of the Council
are present, the matter shall automatically be continued to the agenda of the next
regular meeting of the Council, unless otherwise ordered by the Council.
Notwithstanding the above, if a tie vote results at a time when one or more Council
Member(s) are abstaining for reasons other than conflict of interest then, in that
instance, the abstention vote shall be counted in favor of the motion thereby breaking
the tie vote.
8.1 DEFINITIONS:
As a rule of thumb, it can be said that legislative acts of the City Council
(usually a rule of public conduct for long-term application) are taken by ordinance,
whereas more routine business and administrative matters (usually more temporary
and transitory in nature) are accomplished by "resolutions' The term "resolution" in
its general sense will denote any action taken affirmatively via a vote of the Council,
other than one taken by ordinance. As used in this City, however, three terms are in
general use to denote such (non -ordinance) actions: "resolution", "minute order", and
" motion" (thereafter recorded by minute entry). Technically, all three are equally as
legally effective and binding; they just vary in the formality of respective
memorialization. The most formal is referred to locally as a. "resolution". This, in
addition to being referenced in the minutes, will be recorded by a separate document,
16
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 15
numbered in sequence and preserved in a separate set of books. Such
" resolutions "are used in this City for various reasons, such as when specifically
required by law, when needed as a separate evidentiary document to be transmitted
to another governmental agency, or where the frequency of future reference back to
its contents warrants a separate document (with the additional "whereas" explanatory
material it often recites) to facilitate such future reference and research.
A "minute order" as used locally denotes a Council action which is recorded
simply by an item entry in the minutes of the meeting at which it was accomplished,
and no separate document is made to memorialize it. However, sequential numbering
shall be assigned to each motion to facilitate indexing.
8.2 RESOLUTIONS PREPARED IN ADVANCE:
Where a resolution has been prepared in advance, the procedure shall be:
motion, second, discussion, vote pursuant to methods prescribed in Section 7.1, and
result declared. It shall not be necessary to read a resolution in full or by title except
to identify it. Any member may require that the resolution be read in full.
8.3 RESOLUTIONS NOT PREPARED IN ADVANCE:
Where a resolution has not been prepared in advance, the procedure shall be to
instruct the City Manager or the City Attorney to prepare a resolution for. presentation
at the next Council meeting.
8.4 URGENCY RESOLUTIONS:
In matters of urgency, a resolution may be presented verbally in motion form
together with instructions for written preparation for later execution. After the
resolution has been verbally stated, the voting procedure in 8.2 above shall be
followed.
Urgency resolutions shall be avoided except when absolutely necessary; and
shall be avoided entirely when resolutions are required by law, in improvement acts,
zoning matters, or force account work on public projects. Where the resolution has
been drafted in written form, either before or during the meeting, this paragraph shall
not be deemed applicable.
�, r17
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 16
9.1 INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES:
Ordinances shall not be passed within five days of their introduction, nor at
other than a regular meeting or at an adjourned regular meeting. However, an urgency
ordinance may be passed immediately upon introduction and either at a regular or
special meeting. When ordinances, other than urgency ordinances, are altered after
introduction, they shall be passed only at a regular or at an adjourned regular meeting
held at least five days after alteration.
Corrections of typographical or clerical errors are not alterations within the
meaning of this section.
9.2 EFFECTIVE DATE:
All ordinances, except as provided in Section 36937 of the Government Code,
shall take effect 30 days after adoption, but may be made operative at such later date
as may be designated in the ordinance.
9.3 PUBLISHING:
It shall be the duty of the City Clerk to post or publish all ordinances in
accordance with section 36933 of the Government Code within 15 days after
adoption.
10. POLITICAL ACTIVITIES
(A) Council Members shall not use, or attempt to use, their position, office or
authority to influence, aid or obstruct any City employee from securing any
position, nomination, confirmation or promotion, or change in compensation or
position in the City upon consideration or condition that the vote or political
influence or action of such person or another shall be given or used in behalf of,
or withheld from, any candidate, officer, or party, or upon any other corrupt
condition or consideration. This prohibition shall apply to urging or discouraging
the individual employee's action.
(B) A Council Member or candidate shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit
political funds or contributions, knowingly, from other officers or employees of
the local agency or from persons on an employment list of the City, with the
. l8
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 17
knowledge that the person from whom the contribution is solicited is an officer
or employee of the City. This section shall not prohibit the Council Member
from requesting political contributions from officers or employees of the City if
the solicitation is part of a solicitation made to a significant segment of the
public which may include officers of employees of the City.
(C) No Council Member or candidate shall engage in political activity during
working hours in City officers or work areas where such activity would disrupt
the workplace. For purposes of this section, City offices or work areas includes
the areas behind the public counters, but excludes the Council, Chambers and
Council Member offices.
4.
1 ._ 1
To the extent not required by State laws, these rules of procedure shall be
considered directory only; and compliance herewith shall not be considered mandatory
or jurisdictional.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 6th day of October 1998 by the
following vote:
AYES: - Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
r
JOH ENA, Maor
City of La Quinta,. California
Resolution No. 98-109
10/6/98
Page 18
ATTEST:
AUNDRA L. JU OLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/Y /
DAWN C. CHONEYW LL, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
0, Aw%.w
20
BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: g
ORDINANCE NO. 393
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTION
6.08.050 OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO DISTURBANCES BY CONSTRUCTION
NOISES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That Section 6.08.050 of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal
Code is hereby repealed and replaced as follows:
6.08.50 Disturbances by construction noises
A. It is a nuisance and it is unlawful, for any person to be engaged or employed, or
for any person to cause any other person to be engaged or employed, in any
work of construction, erection, alteration, repair, addition to, or improvement to
realty, except between the hours set forth as follows:
October 1st Monday - Friday: seven a.m. to
Through five -thirty p.m.
April 30th Saturday: eight a.m. to five p.m.
Sunday: none
Code Holidays*: none
May 1' Through Monday -Friday: six a.m. to seven
September 30th p• m•
Saturday: eight a.m. to five p.m.
Sunday: none
Code Holidays*: none
c.W .; 0
Ordinance No. 393
Municipal Code Amendment Section 6.08.050
Construction Noise Disturbances
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 2
*For purposes of this section, the following shall be considered Code Holidays:
New Year's Day (January 1)
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day (third Monday in January)
President's Day (third Monday in February formerly Washington's
birthday)
Memorial Day (last Monday in May)
Independence Day (July 4)
Labor Day (first Monday in September)
Veteran's Day (November 1 1)
Thanksgiving (fourth Thursday in November)
Christmas Day (December 25)
B. No person doing or causing work prohibited by subsection A of this section,
after being informed orally or in writing that the work is in violation of Section
A, shall fail, refuse or neglect to cease said work.
Exceptions:
1. Emergency repair of existing installations or equipment or appliances;
2. Construction work complying with the terms of a written early work permit
which may be issued by the city manager or his designee, upon showing of
sufficient need due to hot or inclement weather, or the use of an unusually long
process material, or other circumstances of unusual and compelling nature.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City
Council held on this 16t' day of December 2003, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
to
Ordinance No. 393
Municipal Code Amendment Section 6.08.050
Construction Noise Disturbances
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 3
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(CITY SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
Ordinance No. 393
Municipal Code Amendment Section 6.08.050
Construction Noise Disturbances
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss.
CITY OF LA QUINTA )
I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify
the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 393 which was
introduced at a regular meeting held on the 2"d day of December, 2003, and was
adopted at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of December, 2003, not being
less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof.
I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the
City of La Quinta as specified in a Resolution of the City Council.
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
BUSINESS SESSION ITEM:
ORDINANCE NO. 394
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO
SECTIONS 9.160.020 (TABLE 9-17.7), 9.40.040 (TABLE
9-1), 9.60.100 AND 13.12.160(B) OF THE LA QUINTA
MUNICIPAL CODE
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2003-079
CITY OF LA QUINTA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. These Municipal Code Amendments clarify and carry out the intent
of the Code to comply with current practices, or streamline the entitlement process;
and
SECTION 2. That the La Quinta Municipal Code, be amended as contained in
the attached Exhibit "A"; and
SECTION 3. Environmental Determination. This Ordinance has compiled with
the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" in that the Community Development Department has determined that the
Amendments to the Municipal Code are exempt pursuant to Chapter 2.6, Section
21080 of the Public Resources Code, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Statutes, and Section 15268, ministerial project, of the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 4. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City
Council held on this 16t' day of December, 2003, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
0 �1
Ordinance No. 394
Various Code Amendments
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 2
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
. -ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
ordnance No. 394
Various Code Amendments
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss.
CITY OF LA QUINTA )
I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the
foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 394 which was
introduced at a regular meeting on the 2"d day of December, 2003, and was adopted
at a regular meeting field on the .16' day of December, 2003, not being less than 5
days after the date of introduction thereof.
I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City
of La Quinta as specified in a Resolution of the City Council.
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
Ordinance No. 394 EXHIBIT "A"
Zoning Code Amendment 2003-079
Adopted:
Table 9-17, Section 9.160.020 is amended to include the following:
Excerpt of: Table 9-17 Exempt Signs Not Requiring a Sign Permit
Sign Type J'Placement£ Maximuml Illumination
f
Area
7. Temporary decorations clearly n/a n/a Yes
incidental and customary and
commonly associated with any
national, local or religious holiday,
provided such temporary decorations E.
are erected no earlier than forty-five
(45) days from the applicable holiday
and removed within twenty-one (21)
days after the applicable holiday.
Table 9-1, Section 9.40.040 is amended to include the following:
SACity Clerk\Ordinances\Exhibit A Ord 394.docSACity Clerk\Ordinances\Exhibit A Ord 394.doc
Ordinance No. 394
Zoning Code Amendment 2003-079
Adopted:
Section 9.60.100(13)(1) is hereby amended to include the following:
(B)(1) ""Guest house" means a detached or attached -unit which
has sleeping and sanitary facilities but no cooking facilities and
which is used primarily for sleeping purposes by members of the
family occupying the main building, their nonpaying guests, or
domestic employees."
Section 13.12.160 (B) is hereby amended to include the following:
"B. Request by the Subdivider. Before the expiration of the tentative
map, the subdivider may apply for a one-year extension of time.
Requests for extensions of time shall be filed with the community
development department on either an approved form or by letter. All
requests for extensions of time shall include:
1. A completed application form or letter;
2. An identification of the length of time requested and reasons for the
request;
3. The current processing fee as charged by the city for tentative map
time extensions;
4. Twenty-five copies of the tentative map as approved by the city
council. Additional copies may be requested subsequent to the
application submittal.
Extensions of time may be granted by the Community Development
Director if there are no changes to the approved tentative map. The
Director may waive some or all submittal material as noted in Section
1 through 4 herein. Extensions of time that include modifications to
the approved tentative map are subject to the public notification
procedure provided for in Section 13.12.090 and will be considered at
a public hearing, to be held by the designated approval authority as
set forth in Section 13.04.060. The approval authority may approve a
maximum of three one-year time extensions and shall impose
additional conditions of approval if such conditions are intended to
maintain the public health, safety and welfare and/or to comply with
current city, state or federal requirements.
If, as part of the request for extension of the term of a tentative map,
the subdivider requests changes or amendments to the tentative map
or the conditions of approval for that map, the city may impose other
Ordinance No. 394
Zoning Code Amendment 2003-079
Adopted:
conditions or amendments to the tentative map or the conditions of
approval including the then -current standards and requirements for
approval of tentative maps.
Section 13.04.060 is hereby amended to include the following:
Type of Action :Review
;Approval
Authority _<.
Authority
Tentative map
City staff
City council
extensions
Other
responsible =
Community
agencies I
Development
Planning
Director2
Commission'
1 Planning Commission shall review tentative tract map when City Council is the Approval Authority
2 Community Development Director may only consider extensions if there are no changes to the tentative
tract map
BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: /D
ORDINANCE NO. 395
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REVISED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA AND CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC
CASE NO.: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2003-006
APPLICANT: CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. (the
"Development Agreement Law") authorizes cities to enter into binding development
agreements with persons having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the
development of such property, all for the purpose of strengthening the public planning
process, encouraging private participation and comprehensive planning and identifying
the economic costs of such development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta ("City" or "City
Council", as applicable), on the 3rd of June, 2003, held a duly noticed public hearing to
consider (i) a disposition and development agreement ("Original DDA") by and between
the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and Center Point Development, LLC,
a California limited liability company (the "Original Developer"), pursuant to which the
Original Developer agreed to purchase certain real property located within the City (the
"Site"); and (ii) a development agreement ("Original Development Agreement") by and
between the City and the Original Developer, pertaining to the Site. By adoption of
City Council Ordinance No. 385, the City Council approved the Original- Development
Agreement; and .
WHEREAS, prior to execution of the Original Development Agreement, the
Original Developer requested certain changes thereto, including (i) changing the
developer entity from the Original Developer to CP Development La Quinta, LLC, a
California limited liability company ("Proposed Developer"), (ii) revising the landscaping
obligations of the Proposed Developer to account for the possibility that the City does
not obtain certain landscaping grants, and (iii) revising the insurance requirements for
the Proposed Developer; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original DDA, as revised, the Proposed
Developer has an equitable interest in the Site and qualifies to enter into a
Development Agreement pursuant to the Development Agreement Law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California ("City
Council"), did on the 2nd of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the Revised Development Agreement; and,
Ordinance No. 395
Development Agreement 2003-006
CP Development Le Quint@, LLC
Adopted: December 2, 2003
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California,
did on the 25th of November, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the
Revised Development Agreement and the recommendation of the Planning Commission
has been received by the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, at said City Council Public Hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be
heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approving
the Revised Development Agreement:
1. The proposed Revised Development Agreement is consistent with the
objectives, policies, general land uses and programs of the City of La Quinta
General Plan and Specific Plan 2001-005.
2. The property is within the Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential, and
Park Districts of the 1992 General Plan Update which permits the proposed use
and the proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La
Quinta General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2).
3. The land uses authorized and regulations prescribed for the Revised
Development Agreement are compatible with the zoning and its related
regulations now applicable to the property. The site is zoned Tourist
Commercial, Medium Density Residential and Park which permits the proposed
uses provided conditions are met.
4. The proposed Revised Development Agreement conforms with public
convenience and the general welfare by providing for extensive public
improvements and conforms to good land use practice by requiring the
development of a commercial development.
5. Approval of this Revised Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, and general welfare since adequate provision has been made in
previous City approvals to provide for necessary and desirable improvements
and since these approvals are incorporated herein.
6. Approval of this Revised Development Agreement will not adversely affect the
orderly development of the subject or surrounding property nor the preservation
of area -wide property values, but rather will enhance them by encouraging
planned, phased growth.
�.%J0
Ordinance No. 395
Development Agreement 2003-006
CP Development La Quinta, LLC
Adopted: December 2, 2003
Page 3
7. Consideration of the Revised Development Agreement has been accomplished
pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. and the City of
La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.250.030, which governs Development
Agreements.
WHEREAS, all actions required to be taken by the City precedent to the
adoption of this Ordinance have been regularly and duly taken.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La
Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. APPROVAL. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the
Revised Development Agreement in the form presented to the City Council concurrent
with the approval and adoption of this Ordinance, and authorizes and directs the Mayor
to sign the Revised Development Agreement on behalf of the City, and the City Clerk
to record the Revised Development Agreement in the Official Records of Riverside
County in accordance with applicable law.
SECTION 2 ENVIRONMENTAL. Said Specific Plan complies with the
requirements of The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 as amended (Resolution 83-63). The Community Development Department
completed Environmental Assessment 2001-436, certifying a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impact as adopted by the City Council on February 5,
2002 under Resolution 2002-07, for this Specific Plan 2001-005. An Addendum has
been prepared for the proposed Specific Plan 2001-005, Amendment #1 and
Development Agreement 2003-006. No changed circumstances or conditions are
proposed which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental review
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption
of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places
designated by resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its
certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances
of this City.
Ordinance No. 395
Development Agreement 2003-006
CP Development La Quinta, LLC
Adopted: December 2, 2003
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City
Council held on this 16" day of December, 2003, by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(CITY SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /S
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
November 5, 2003 10:00 a.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee
was called to order at 10:06 a.m. by Planning Manager Oscar Orci
who led the flag salute.
B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham, and Bill Bobbitt. It
was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Bobbitt to excuse Committee Member Thoms.
C. Staff present: Planning -Manager Oscar Orci, Principal Planners Stan
Sawa and Fred Baker, Associate Planners Wallace Nesbit and Martin
Magana, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA:
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of October 1,
2003. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve the Minutes as
submitted.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Site Development Permits 2003-789; a request of Stamko
Development and Tom Olsen/Acala Architects for a review of
architectural and conceptual landscaping plans for a 5,909 square foot
Goodyear Retail Store for the property located at the southeast corner
of Auto Center Drive and La Quinta Drive within the La Quinta
Commercial Development.
1. Planning Manager Oscar Orci presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department. Staff introduced Russ
4. 6
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
November 5, 2003
Beckner, representing Stamko, Doug Matista representing
Goodyear, Gil Alcala architect, who all gave a presentation on
the project.
2. Committee Member Cunningham stated he liked the movement
toward the modern buildings and breaking from the Spanish
look. He likes the use of the barrel tile and standing seam
metal. He has no objections.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he liked the design as well.
In regard to the landscaping, he was concerned about the area
where there appeared to be pedestrian traffic. Chris Clarke,
owner of the property, stated no parking is allowed on La
Quinta Drive and therefore, there would be no pedestrian traffic.
Mr. Alcala stated there is a walkway that extends up toward
Highway 111. Ms. Clarke stated there would be no access
allowed between Parcels 8 and 9 would not be encouraged.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he liked the plant palette, but
asked where they were going to obtain a ten gallon plant. Mr.
Alcala stated it was a mistake. Committee Member Bobbitt
asked that all plants be 15 gallon on La Quinta Drive and five
gallon on the interior.
5. There being no further questions, it was moved and seconded
by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute
Motion 2003-044 recommending approval of Site Development
Permit 2003-789, as recommended by staff and amended as
follows:
a. Condition added. 24-inch box, 15 gallon with a minimum
of 1.5 caliper plant material on La Quinta Drive
b. Five gallon on the interior.
C. Recommendation: the northeasterly pedestrian access/
walkways along the north property line be potentially
eliminated.
Unanimously approved.
B. Site Development Permit 2003-790; a request of Stamko
Development/Perkowitz and Ruth Architects for a review of
architectural and conceptual landscaping plans for two multi -use retail
stores consisting of 10,980 and 11,040 square feet for the property r
G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\11-5-03 WD.doc - - 2 2
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
November 5, 2003
located at the southeast corner f Highway 111 and La Quinta Drive
within the Centre at La Quitna Commercial Development.
1. Planning Manger Oscar Orci presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department. Staff introduced Russ
Beckner who introduced Jim Ruth, architect, and Eric Linus of
TKC, who gave a presentation on the project. Chris Clarke,
owner of the property also gave a presentation on the entire
site.
2. Committee Member Cunningham stated that the material to be
used on the canvas will last a long time and there should be no
objection to the use of this material as it is a composite and a
good use of material. He had no issue with the architecture.
The west elevation is especially nice.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the architecture of the
Center was going to follow a central theme. Ms. Clarke stated
each is a little different in color, but there is a central theme
throughout the Center. She explained the architectural items
that were carried throughout the Center. Committee Member
Bobbitt stated he likes the diversity of the site. Ms. Clarke
emphasized the use of color to distinguish each of the building
complexes. Mr. Beckner stated the architect was asked to
create buildings that mirrored each other, but were different.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked that the tree species and
sizes be defined on the plans. Staff stated the landscape plan
would be brought back to the Committee. Committee Member
Bobbitt stated the plan is similar to the rest of the Center and
ok, but the size should be spelled out. They should all be at
least five gallon. The date palms should never be near any
pedestrian traffic and ensure that any palm trees used are in
good condition.
5. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved
and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to
adopt Minute Motion 2003-045 recommending approval of Site
Development Permit 2003-790, as recommended by staff and
amended:
G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\11-5-03 WD.doc - - 3 3
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
November 5, 2003
a. Condition added: All plant material 15 gallon on La
Quinta Drive and five gallon on the interior.
b. Condition added: All date palms shall be nursery grown
and inspected by the landscape architect as to their good
condition with a minimum 8 foot trunk height. Would not
recommend using the Mesquite tree.
C. Condition Added: All trees shall be 15 gallon, 24 inch
box trees, 1.5 calipher.
Unanimously approved.
C. Site Development Permit 2003-792; a request of Whiteco Residential,
LLC for a review of architectural and landscaping plans for a 224 unit
apartment complex located at the northeast corner of Washington
Street and Palm Royale (extended).
1. Associate Planner Martin Magana presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department. Staff introduced Tim
Connelly, Avi, landscape architect, Kurt Saxon civil engineer,
who gave a presentation on the project.
2. Committee Member Cunningham asked what the exterior
material would be. Mr. Connelly stated Spanish lace.
Committee Member Cunningham stated his main concern is
public view. He does not like the lace stucco. It should be
machine dash finish and not the sand finish as it will show
everything. The roof pitches need to come down to not show
so much roof. Reduce them to a 4 pitch. The exterior elevation
needs to be as uniform as possible.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the window surrounds
were inset. Mr. Connelly stated they were foam and the railings
were small and iron.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the plant palette is a good
use of material. Again, he would recommend not using the
Chilean Mesquite due to the high maintenance they require.
Discussion followed regarding the different tree species.
5. Committee member Cunningham asked that the columns be
precast concrete.
� aJ
G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\11-5-03 WD.doc - - 4 4
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
November 5, 2003
6. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved
and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to
adopt Minute Motion 2003-046 recommending approval of Site
Development Permit 2003-792, as amended:
Conditions added:
a. Exterior material machine dash finish.
b. Maximum room pitch to be 4:12.
C. Garage doors shall be metal roll up
d. Chilean Mesquite tree be replaced with a different variety.
e. Columns shall be precast
Unanimously approved.
D. Site Development Permit 2003-791; a request of Prest Vuksic
Architects, Inc. for a review of architectural and landscaping plans for
a 224 unit . apartment complex located at the northeast corner of
Washington Street and Palm Royale (extended).
1. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department. Staff introduced Dave
Prest the applicant and architect for the project, who gave a
presentation on the project.
7. Committee Member Cunningham asked if it was mudded tile.
Mr. Stated it was a two-piece mudded tile. Committee Member
Cunningham applauded the design.
8. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he liked the people features.
He would again recommend not using the Mesquite trees.
9. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved
and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to
adopt Minute Motion 2003-047 recommending approval of Site
Development Permit 2003-791, as recommended by staff and
as amended:
Condition added:
a. No Mesquite trees.
Unanimously approved.
G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\11-5-03 WD.doc - - 5 5
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
November 5, 2003
C. Site Development Permit 2003-727, Amendment #1; a request of PM
Renaissance, LLC for a review of architectural and landscaping plans
for a 224 unit apartment complex located at the northeast corner of
Washington Street and Palm Royale Drive(extended) .
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department. Staff introduced Geoff
McComic, the applicant for the project, who gave a
presentation on the project.
2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the history of the site. Mr.
McComic explained who had previously owned it and how they
came to where they are.
3. Committee Member Cunningham stated he had no objection to
the units. The architecture is in keeping with the neighborhood.
4. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved
and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to
adopt Minute Motion 2003-048 recommending approval of Site
Development Permit 2003-727, as recommended by staff.
Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS:
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee
Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural
and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on November
5, 2003. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1:01 a.m. on October 1, 2003.
Res ctfully su mitted,
B T J. SAWYER
Executive Secretary
G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\11-5-03 WD.doc - - 6 6
REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /(10
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
The Regular Meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
October 16, 2003
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by
Chairperson, Leslie Mouriquand at 3:05 p.m. who led the flag salute and
asked for the roll call.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
Present: Commissioners Puente, Sharp, Wilbur, Wright, and
Chairperson Mouriquand.
Staff Present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Community
Development Director Jerry Herman,
Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate
Planner Martin Magana, and Secretary
Carolyn Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
Ill. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente/Sharp to
approve the Minutes of September 18, 2003 as submitted.
Unanimously approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Continued - Point Happy Ranch Phase I Cultural Resources
Assessment.
Applicant: Madison Development
Paleontological Consultant: McKenna et al, Jeanette A.
McKenna, Principal
Location: West side of Washington Street, south of Highway
111
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in
the Community' Development Department.
2. Chairperson Mouriquand introduced Jeanette McKenna,
Consultant.
3. Consultant McKenna was in attendance to clarify any
issues and or redundancies in her report. She asked if
there was a request for more documentation on the
Bradshaw Trail. She stated she had the historic map
. wh.ich showed the trail, but there was no physical
evidence of the trail left on the property. She asked what
additional research the Commission wanted.
4. Chairperson Mouriquand replied there was no more
physical documentation to do. The Commission was
interested in looking at more discussion about putting the
site in a regional context. She stated this might be the
last opportunity to request complete documentation for
the historic and prehistoric time periods of this property.
The Historic Preservation Commission is a Certified Local
Government and has the right and privilege to nominate
this property to the National Register. It is the
Commission's opinion this is one of the gem, historic
properties within La Quinta and is requesting a complete
and adequate discussion of all the time periods and the
cumulative historicity of the property with the idea it
could be nominated to the Historic Register if it is
determined to be eligible.
5. Consultant McKenna commented she was trying to
separate the prehistoric discussion from the historic. She
asked if the Commission wanted the trail, as an entity,
addressed to the National Register, or if that argument
was only for the historic component. Chairperson
Mouriquand replied it was more for the historic
component.
6. Commissioner Wright asked if there was photographic
documentation of any historic remnants of the trail on the
property.
7. Consultant McKenna replied there was none. She noted
historic maps and the general history show the area was
2
k.0
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
traversed as late as
produced. Consu
documented in an
recommendation for
entire Valley should
chance something i
map.
the 1850's when those maps were
tant McKenna stated this was
earlier report. She stated the
monitoring was made because the
be declared sensitive and there's a
iay be found pre -dating the 1858
8. Commissioner Wright commented this information was
adequate.
9. Planning Manager Orci stated the Commission had
indicated they would like the reports included, especially
regarding the Bradshaw Trail, the stage coach line, the
wells, and the adjacent villages and trails.
10. Chairperson Mouriquand stated the report needed more
discussion which should include the layers of time, the
trails, the roads going through, and the fact this was an
earlier circulation area connecting all the villages and
stage stops together. It was considered highly
significant.
11. Consultant McKenna asked if the Commission was
looking for a more detailed report regarding the pre -Point
Happy discussion. Chairperson Mouriquand replied that
was correct.
12. Commissioner Wright added they also wanted the
available history on the area surrounding the property,
such as the information regarding the stage line.
13. Consultant McKenna asked if any of the information was
available in the City's Historic Context Statement.
14. Chairperson Mouriquand stated there were things of value
in the Context Statement and added there should be two
copies of this report on file in the Eastern Information
Center.
15. Consultant McKenna said she had seen a handwritten
map, from CRM Tech, with ownership names and she
had used that map to obtain information for her report.
3 ��
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
16. Chairperson Mouriquand said there was a 1917
ownership, by parcel, map available at the City of La
Quinta. The master is at the Coachella Valley Museum,
in Indio.
17. Consultant McKenna stated she would have to go back
through all the reports but felt she had covered the whole
ownership and didn't believe there was any further
research necessary on the ownership.
18. Chairperson Mouriquand agreed and added there could be
more research on particular individuals who were
connected with the property; i.e., Chauncey Clark, and
Happy Lundbeck. The Commission was interested in any
information that would be helpful in making a case for
eligibility for the National Register.
19. Consultant McKenna replied her research showed the
Clark ownership was more significant than any
association to Lundbeck. Happy Lundbeck was in the
general area, but not directly associated with this
property other than having owned it at one time. But the
Clarks were the ones responsible for altering and
developing the property. Mr. Clarkkis presence was very
limited and Mrs. Clark was actually responsible for most
of the improvements. The local people, that occupied
the site, were more representative of what was going on
than the property owners.
20. Commissioner Wright asked if the Consultant had spoken
to Louise Neeley.
21. Consultant McKenna replied she had a brief discussion
with her. She was provided with some materials, and
given the names of two other people to contact on
background as Ms. Neeley was leaving on an extended
trip to Europe. Ms. McKenna then asked if the
Commission was actually looking for a National Register
nomination package, or the research for a future
nomination package. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the
r)^f)
4 r.b4.
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
report would be the first step in the nomination process.
Ms. McKenna confirmed the Commission was looking for
a technical document with all the information needed for
a future nomination. She asked if the research comes
back negative what would the Commission's position be.
22. Chairperson Mouriquand stated the Commission would
take the recommendation as advisory and proceed
accordingly.
23. Consultant McKenna stated her concern was the research
showed most of the physical remains on the property
were significantly changed and there is nothing
representative of the Clark period. Whole features, such
as the corrals, the horse track, and the stables are
completely gone. She would need to interview folks who
actually lived there, or near by to get additional
information. The property is unique in that there was
such a long period of time represented. She asked if the
Commission was more concerned about the Clark period.
24. Chairperson Mouriquand replied it was the totality of the
prehistoric and historic time periods and the cultural value
of the property.
25. Consultant McKenna asked how much of the modern
period did the Commission want included.
26. Chairperson Mouriquand replied through the 1960's. The
property has a lot of symbolism- as far as a cultural
landscape. The Commission does not wish to single out
a particular time period as more significant than the
other, it's the composite package of value on the
property.
27. Consultant McKenna stated she understood the National
Register approach to the research. The property could be
declared National Register eligible because of the
association of certain persons to the property. If it was
potentially eligible, this would not preclude development
of the project. Chairperson Mouriquand replied it was not
the Commission's goal to stop or alter the project, but
just to completely document it and if it affords certain
statuses, then the City may be interested in pursuing a
National Register nomination.
S
2
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
28. Consultant McKenna stated she was wondering about
timing, and if there is any particular reason the work
could not proceed in tandem with the development .of the
project. Chairperson Mouriquand replied there is no
reason why construction/development could not proceed._
29. Planning Manager Orci asked if the Commission wished
to establish some thresholds for the project regarding
receipt of permits prior to the completion of the review.
30. Chairperson Mouriquand replied monitoring would be
needed. If the results of the monitoring yield something
important this should reflect on the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy.
31. Consultant McKenna asked if she could proceed on the
maps, or with just the plan check. Staff replied she
would be allowed to proceed.
32. Commissioner Wright stated the Commission did not
want to hold up the project. That was not their intent.
A Certificate of Occupancy would be acceptable. Staff
stated this would satisfy recommendation number one in
the staff report.
33. Consultant McKenna asked if the Commission wanted to
see a final document after grading, or one that addresses
the National Register issues prior to the grading, and
amend the report if something were found during grading;
or does the Commission want two different reports.
34. Commissioner Wright said it could be one ongoing report.
Staff added it would have to be completed before the
issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
35. Chairperson Mouriquand added that was correct and
asked when the Certificate of Occupancy was expected
to be issued. Staff replied it depended upon the project
schedule, but it should afford time to prepare the
documents.
2W 6
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
36. Applicant Rick Wilkerson was introduced. He stated they
planned on submitting site plan and grading permits in
another month and a half. They are estimating 60 to 90
days for the City to process the paperwork and then they
will start construction. Construction should take six
months. He estimates 10 to 12 months until the first
Certificate of Occupancy is requested.
37. Consultant McKenna said if the on -site monitoring was
conducted during the initial grading times, before actual
construction that would allow almost six months to
complete everything.
38. Planning Manager Orci stated he saw two issues. First
the completion of the report and second, providing the
technical data for National Register eligibility.
39. Consultant McKenna asked if the Commission wanted her
to re -do the Phase I report or continued to complete the
packet. Chairperson Mouriquand answered just an
addendum, or subsequent report.
40. Consultant McKenna replied it could all be incorporated
into the final technical report which would address the
National Register and generate an entirely new report
based on the additional research, the oral interviews, the
results of the grading monitoring and any new
information obtained.
41. Chairperson Mouriquand stated it might be worthwhile to
have Ms. McKenna come back with a progress report
regarding the new data obtained from the monitoring.
42. Consultant McKenna said she anticipated she would be
doing site plans if any pre -history was found.
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
43. Planning Manager Orci stated this brought up a third
issue which is the results of the monitoring program
which is part of the CEQA analysis and the Environmental
Assessment. This is typically handled on an
administrative level. Does the Commission want to leave
the monitoring to staff. The Environmental Assessment
and monitoring program can be independently reviewed,
separate from the National Register eligibility and the
technical report. It can then be reviewed and a threshold
placed that prior to issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy a Phase I, or addendum to the Phase I shall
be completed. These should possibly be considered as
three separate thresholds in order to move the project on.
44. Consultant McKenna suggested keeping the project as
straightforward as possible. The Phase I report can be
upgraded in the next four to six weeks prior to grading.
If the Commission is satisfied with the upgrade of the
Phase I report, the National Register research can begin
and we can complete the monitoring report. We can then
.report the results of the monitoring program virtually
immediately. In between the time of the end of the
monitoring and issuance of an Occupancy Permit, both
the monitoring and the National Register documents could
be completed for review. Issuance of the Occupancy
Permit would be dependent on the Commission's
comments and satisfaction with the documents.
45. Commissioner Wilber agreed and added the consultant
was very conscientious in her approach in the reports
already completed.
46. Commissioner Sharp agreed an interim report would help
the Commission monitor the progress of the project.
47. Consultant McKenna stated an update could be available
by the next Commission meeting.
48. Commissioner Puente agreed, but wanted to discuss the
historic gate.
49. Planning Manager Orci asked if the Commission wanted
one interim report on Phase I as well as the National
Register eligibility.
266"N
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
50. Consultant McKenna stated she would complete the
Phase I report first, including the preliminary research for
the National Register. She said they may not have all of
the Oral History done, and would need to get direction
from the Historical Society as to what format should be
used as far as their system criteria. We will extrapolate
from the Oral History material needed for the Phase I
report and carry it further for the National Register since
the Phase I is still a CEQA document.
51. Planning Manager Orci said he would like to set a
threshold to keep the two issues separate. If the
Commission agrees we would want to wrap up the Phase
I independent of the National Register eligibility prior to
the first issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Then
this Commission would review National eligibility
requirements independent of the Phase I. Also, would the
Commission like to review the monitoring, or would they
allow the staff to do that?
52. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the Commission would
be interested in looking at the monitoring report.
53. Consultant McKenna stated their monitoring policy was
to have one or more monitors as well as taking more
photos than necessary. The monitors are usually on site
in the morning, when the grading starts, and they stay
until grading is over. The schedule is accommodated in
the field, and certain things are to their discretion. If
it's too active an area to adequately cover additional
personnel may be brought in. If something comes up we
have the authority to halt activity in an area until we can
come to a conclusion whether it's something that can be
handled under the monitoring program, or will require
some sort of an alteration of the activity and schedule.
Does the Commission want to be involved or called when
something comes up in the field?
54. Commission Wright suggested she contact a staff person.
55. Consultant McKenna asked how much discretion she had
if evidence of the Palm Grove, or the pre -historic trail
were found, and would the Commission want to visit the
site.
9 r1l ;7
A;-
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
56. Chairperson Mouriquand said the City's policy in
conditioning every project is when monitoring is required
they also require monitoring of the related off -sites which
can include trenching, utility lines, and road
improvements that are adjacent and part of this whole
project development. So, what we want monitored is not
just within the confines of the building envelope but the
trenching and any project related improvements.
57. Consultant McKenna asked if there is an off -site storage
yard, would she need to monitor that area. Chairperson
Mouriquand replied yes.
58. Planning Manager Orci added the Commission might want
to add the standard Conditions of Approval which
indicate trenching and off -site grading are included in the
monitoring.
59. Consultant McKenna asked what the City's policy was on
requiring, or not requiring Native America participation.
Were they needed on site, or only to be called in when
something of Native American origin is found.
60. Chairperson Mouriquand replied it was usually on an on -
call basis. If the Tribe was insistent on having a monitor
there, then we would want to work cooperatively with
the Band. We don't condition projects to have full-time
Native Americans monitors present.
61. Consultant McKenna replied she would proceed on the
basis if something is located, the Native Americans would
be contacted.
62. Chairperson Mouriquand said they would probably be
called for anything after the pre -historic period, such as
human remains.
63. Planning Manager Orci stated Principal Planner Sawa had
brought up one of the standard conditions which is the
final report on monitoring is submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to issuance of the first
production home building permit. Typically, after mass
grading an applicant will want to do the model complex
and that procedure is started immediately after grading
10 ��J
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
while they're finishing up the monitoring report. If it is
the Commission's desire we would like to maintain that
protocol unless directed otherwise. The only difference
being it will be submitted to the Commission instead of
the Community Development Department for review.
64. Consultant McKenna stated if the monitoring contains a
negative finding, the report will be done immediately. It
would only be delayed if artifact or, site forms need to be
prepared.
65. Planning Manager Orci added the report also requested
the balance of the standard conditions be required such
as curation.
66. Consultant McKenna asked what should happen to any
artifacts, if found.
67. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the City has adopted
Curation Policies. The City will determine what to do
with the artifacts.
68. Consultant McKenna added the Commission can make
the decision whether or not any historic remains need to
be kept or de -accessioned. She then asked if a draft of
the Amended Phase I was needed by the next meeting.
Staff replied the Commission would need to discuss that
and coordinate with staff.
69. Planning Manager Orci said there was one other item to
discuss and that was the gate issue. Staff was
recommending they work with the applicant to locate the
gate in an appropriate location, under the Commission's
direction.
70. Chairperson Mouriquand stated the Commission wanted
to leave the gate in situ and re -design the entryway to
accommodate the gate.
11 r)�,�)
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
71. Applicant Wilkerson asked to address this issue. He
showed a picture of the gate in question and asked to
read into the record a copy of the letter received from
Christopher Kiernan (cepy attached). He added, as a
backdrop to this letter, the name Point Happy was
probably only known by a few people in this whole
Valley. Madison Development re -invented the name Point
Happy, kept and promoted the Point Happy name as an
area that is of interest for tourists to come by and see.
When they purchased the Point Happy Ranch they
understood . the gate was not old and was new. They
appreciated the history of the site as well as the name
and decided to retain the history in the name of the
development - The Estates at Point Happy Ranch. They
have consistently promoted the idea of Point Happy being
a place that occurred in time and want people to know
that when they buy a home here, shop, or eat at the
Point Happy Commercial Center, this is part of the
history of this area. The street names chosen, Clark
Court, Bradshaw Trail, and Heritage Way continue this
heritage. He asked why they had to preserve a gate and
look that wasn't even in existence until 1977. He felt it
was enough to maintain the area with "Point Happy
Ranch" included in the name and to have the new gate
state that. He did not wish to have an wooden sign at
the entry. He added, in respect to the Kiernan's, they
offered to put the gate in the retention pond, which is
inside and on private streets. They just don't feel they
should be held to a guideline that has no bearing in
history regarding that specific gate.
72. Chairperson Mouriquand replied there is a permit
indicating whether the gate is of a historic resource. If
not, that may need to be corrected. In regards to the
Point Happy Ranch, the name is widely known. If the
developer has evidence this is not a historic gate then the
Commission will be happy to look at the letter. The
Commission would then have to do further research to
see if this is gate does need to be preserved in situ.
73. Consultant McKenna stated she thought the oral histories
and photographs would clarify this matter.
12 c.
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
74. Applicant Wilkerson said they have tried to promote the
name of Point Happy. They would like to offer a
compromise in keeping with the theme that we are trying
to produce here. First of all, the gates are rusted out and
the entrance is small. We have worked on an idea with
Ron Gregory, to reproduce a section of the gate to make
it bigger, more elaborate, but basically the same look, to
cover the entire entrance. The gates would be the same
type of gates. As you drive through they would open one
on each side. We would put the name Point Happy
Ranch in the gate. I don't think a wood painted sign is
the look they want. A plaque would be placed on the
gate stating it is a historic location.
75. Commissioner Wright said if the existing gate was
produced, or built, in the 70's, he didn't think anybody
on the Commission would have a problem with what was
suggested. If the gate was made in 1977 there's no
reason to keep it in the front area as it is not historic.
76. Applicant Wilkerson suggested they obtain an affidavit
from Mark Kiernan as to the year it was built.
77. Commissioner Wright replied he knew Chris Kiernan and
he was a good source of information. The Commission,
however, would like to go back and check the oral history
as well as look at the early photographs of the property.
78. Consultant McKenna said it may be the gate is actually a
replication of something that was gone for awhile and
was brought back.
79. Chairperson Mouriquand stated the County started
issuing building permits in 1950, and a building permit
may have been issued for the gate's construction. She
suggested looking at the County's building permit
archive.
13 r; ry
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
80. Consultant McKenna said she usually did more
photography than necessary for her reports, and they
would be available to be archived. All of the reports will
be sent to the Historical Society and the Information
Center. All the criteria for compliance with the Historical
Society and the City will be met. One of the main goals
of the interviews will be to verify what the physical
remains on the site represent, including the gate.
81. Commissioner Wright stated he liked the idea of keeping
the Point Happy concept alive, but the gate did not need
to be included if it was not historic.
82. Commissioner Wilbur stated the information on the gate
should be validated by one, or two other sources. If the
gate is not historic, then there should be some other
symbolic representation of the Point Happy idea.
83. The applicant's representative Ed Alderson, asked if the
Commission would like to see the plan when it is
available.
84. Commissioner Wright said they would. He added the
gate does not have to be replicated exactly. He felt the
project should retain the same type of feeling the
property had in the 1920's.
85. Applicant Wilkerson agreed that was the same type of
atmosphere they were trying to keep.
86. Commissioner Sharp said he saw no artistic value in the
current gate. He was concerned about the location of
the existing gate in relation to what was planned inside.
He suggested they make a gate that says Point Happy
Ranch in the Spanish or Tuscan style, possible with some
tiles on it.
87. Commissioner Puente said she agreed they should find
out about the date of the gate before making a decision.
88. Chairperson Mouriquand suggested they table the issue
of the gate until they have further information.
14 r'a
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
89. Consultant McKenna said she would make sure the
research is included in the amended report after she
researches the permits.
90. Planning Manager Orci suggested the applicant research
the data as soon as possible. If this is not an original
gate or does not have significant historical value the
Commission may want to direct staff to work with the
applicant to replicate the gate entry unless it is of
historical significance. The matter will then be brought
back to the Commission for review.
91. Chairperson Mouriquand and Commissioner Wright
concurred.
92. Applicant Wilkerson asked if he could go ahead and
process the final map.
93. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the Commission was
seeking additional substantiation on whether the gate is
historic before proceeding.
94. Consultant McKenna said she would check the building
permits which would show the approved design and the
date it was approved. She will provide the information as
soon as it is obtained to help staff schedule a meeting to
discuss the matter further.
95. Applicant Wilkerson commented the gate was never
useable as an entrance.
96. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the Commission was not
requesting that option. The Commission's concern was
with the historicity of the gate. The concern was
retaining it in situ. It would not be a functional gate, but
to move it to the back part of the property would deny
the public the opportunity to continue to view this.
historic resource. The Commission is suggesting the gate
component itself be incorporated into a perimeter wall
treatment.
97. Commissioner Wright added the request was based on
the fact the gate was historic.
15 , _4 3
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
98. Planning Manager Orci commented for the purposes of
CEQA the gates need to be preserved on site, with no
specification as to where. The Commission can add
additional information indicating it is a significant
historical resource with the location to be decided at a
later date.
99. Chairperson Mouriquand stated the important aspect was
the documentation because, in the future, the gate may
be considered historic. It has been documented and that
is what needs to be done. However, if it is documented
as a historic gate, the Commission would like the
opportunity to confirm, or refute, that and have the
opportunity to reconsider what is to be done with it.
The County records should provide adequate evidence of
when the gate was built.
100. Applicant Wilkerson asked if the gate has some historic
significance would it be acceptable to incorporate the
gate into the boundary fence for public view. And if it
isn't, would they have to do anything except what has
been previously discussed. He wanted to know if there
was any reason to hold up getting a final map,
considering the agreements discussed.
101. Chairperson Mouriquand replied it shouldn't hold up
getting a- final map as long as the design accommodates
preservation in situ, should that be the determination.
102. Applicant Wilkerson stated that was fine as long as the
gate was moved. .
103. Chairperson Mouriquand replied in situ meant "in place";
without moving it. There seems to be no reason why the
project cannot be re -designed to accommodate that
request.
104. Applicant Wilkerson replied they felt the historic tree was
of more significance than anything else. They eliminated
two lots to retain the tree. The gate could be moved
down, but there would still be an entrance that preserves
the tree.
16 4-.
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
105. Chairperson Mouriquand replied it may not be structurally
feasible to move the gate. It might be wiser, in the long
run, to leave it where it is.
106. Consultant McKenna commented she would need a day
or two with the County records. On the off chance the
gate was built without a permit she would rely on other
information from the Historical Society or photos that can
be dated. She commented that maybe the Kiernan's had
photos of the property when they bought it that showed
the gate wasn't there. That would help verify the dates.
107. Planning Manager Orci summarized the discussion into
the following points: 1. if the gate is not of significant
historical value, staff is directed to work with the
applicant to design a gate similar to the present gate; 2.
to modify the CEQA document indicating the gate is of
no significant value; and, 3. if the gate is historical, the
CEQA document will not be altered and will indicate the
gate is to remain on site. He asked if that was sufficient
for CEQA documentation purposes.
108. Chairperson Mouriquand said it was fine for CEQA
purposes, but added as far as what staff was asking, if
the discussion in the Environmental Assessment was
going to be adequate, because it didn't state in situ, it
should designate preservation on site which could be
anywhere in the project. She asked the Commissioners if
they wanted language to state specifically "in situ".
109. Commissioner Wright said he was not. comfortable with
the phrase "on site". It is too vague. He said the
Commission would need to discuss the location of the
gate if it is historic. He did not wish to have it placed in
the common area.
110. Commissioner Puente asked if the matter could be
discussed after the revised report was received.
1 1 1. Commissioner Wright commented on the way the gate at
Tradition was handled. The gate was not moved. The
road was moved and documented historically.
17
J
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
112. Chairperson Mouriquand said there was not enough
information to conclude the CEQA document and go
forward. These documents could not be completed until
Ms. McKenna could determine the date the gate was
built.
113. Planning Manager Orci stated this project would then be
delayed because the CEQA finding had not been
adequately addressed.
114. Consultant McKenna suggested this might be answered
as soon as she checks the County records.
115. Commissioner Wright added Ms. McKenna could deal
with staff if the gate is not historical. There is no reason
to come back to the Commission.
116. Consultant McKenna asked if there was no permit she
would advise staff and let them know she would need
more time to investigate the date the gate was
constructed.
117. Planning Manager Orci stated Ms. McKenna could work
with staff. He then re -stated the Commission's direction
that the project can move forward if the gate is not
historical, delete that item from the CEQA document and
move the project forward. If it is found it is of historical
significance it will be brought back to the Commission.
118. Applicant Wilkerson thanked the Commission.
123. There being no further discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt
Minute Motion 2003-012 accepting the Point Happy
Ranch Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment with added
conditions as follows:
a The applicant shall provide an Addendum to the
Phase I report which includes additional information
on trails and any other significant historical aspect of
the property.
b. The Paleontological Consultant shall concurrently
continue the technical report on eligibility criteria for
the National Register.
18 t�
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
C. The Phase I Report shall be completed prior to
issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
d. The technical report shall be considered
independently by the Historic Preservation
Commission at a future date.
e. 1). If the gate is not of significant historical value,
staff is directed to work with the applicant to design a
gate similar to the present gate; 2). To modify the
CEQA document indicating the gate is of no
significant value; and, 3). If the gate is historical, the
CEQA document will not be altered and will indicate
the gate is to remain on site.
Unanimously approved.
B. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the City's SilverRock
Ranch
1. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented
information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on
file in the Community Development Department.
2. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the Kennedy House had been
documented before it was torn down.
3. Staff replied it had not been since it was not considered historic.
4. Commissioner Wright commented the Kennedy house had been
vandalized and had been in very poor condition. There was
nothing left that was salvageable.
5. Chairperson Mouriquand said the house had been empty for
years, but it would have been to nice to have had the property
documented prior to demolition. Staff asked why a non -historic
building would be documented.
6. Chairperson Mouriquand stated that there are times when
buildings have cultural value without being 50 years old.
Sometimes they provide information for settlement patterns, or
contribute to the history of the area, etc.
7. Commissioner Wright commented the Commission would have
preferred photographs be taken of the site before demolition.
19
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
8. Chairperson Mouriquand commented what may not be considered
historical today will, in time, reach an age criteria that would
make it historical.
9. Planning Manager Orci said he believed the house did not contain
anything of significance architecturally, or as a significant
settlement.
10. Chairperson Mouriquand said the property was originally a
homesteaded ranch, although the Kennedys were not the
homesteaders. They were subsequent owners and there is history
in the property. There was a large map produced several years
ago including this historic property. Since there was no attempt
to do research, or documentation, we have lost an opportunity to
document some of -our history.
11. Planning Manager Orci replied the report indicates that the
residence was completed post-19501s, and it contains no
features of any historic significance
12. Staff stated this report was done while the building was still
standing.
13. Chairperson Mouriquand asked who prepared the report. Staff
replied Ms. McKenna
14. Chairperson Mouriquand said the Ahmanson house and the
related structures were approximately 42 years old now. Legally
they have not reached the 50 year mark, but are part of a certain
settlement era with some historic value to the latter period of
settlement in La Quinta. If it had been a 50 year old building we
would probably have evoked the Federal Standards as we did
with the Tradition Club (Hacienda del Gato) for adaptive re -use.
If this building is to be used as a temporary clubhouse, what
impact would there be to the structure during and after it is no
longer being used for that purpose?
15. Staff replied the Redevelopment Agency has not yet decided
what would happen to it after its use as a clubhouse. A lot
would depend upon what the architect found structurally,
seismically, etc. The building was documented, but was never
included in the report.
20 �;
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
16. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the City was going to go
through a Seismic structural analysis before the building would be
used as a temporary clubhouse. Staff replied yes. She asked if
depending upon the outcome of the study would that determine
whether it would be used as a temporary clubhouse. Staff
replied that was correct. She also added there was a possibility
the house could be demolished. Staff replied that was not a
current consideration. Chairperson Mouriquand asked how long
the building would be used as a temporary clubhouse. Staff
replied a maximum of two years.
17. Commissioner Wright asked if there were plans to retain the
immediate grounds and the pool. Staff replied the pool would
probably be eliminated. There is a need for temporary golf cart
storage, parking, and access to the clubhouse. If it is used it
would be retrofitted and brought up to State Seismic standards.
The design of the temporary clubhouse would be such that it
could be used for other functions after it is no longer a
clubhouse. It may even be used as a community building, but
that decision has not yet been made.
18. Commissioner Wright asked if the pool could be turned into a
putting green, like the, one at The Tradition. Staff replied the pool
would be covered as the design plan shows a lake being put in
this area.
19. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the pool would be removed and
replaced with a golf course lake. Staff drew a diagram showing
placement of the clubhouse, pool and amenities in the area. She
then asked if there was intent to keep the building and use it for
something else. Staff replied yes. She then asked if all the
outbuildings would be demolished. Staff replied yes.
20. Commissioner Wright asked if those structures were salvageable.
21. Staff indicated that the project is progressing. The Palmer Group
will be doing the first golf course. Grading is scheduled to begin
the first part of January, or February of 2004. The City is trying
to have the course ready for play by January, or February of
2005 depending on the growing season for the Bermuda. If the
grass season were missed, then it would not be opened until the
Fall of 2005.
21 "
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
22. Commissioner Sharp asked about a specific area on the map.
Community Development Director Jerry Herman replied it was
previously planned as youth group golf course, but was taken out
of the plan and its use is currently undecided at this time. It
could possibly be used for parking for scheduled events, and has
many potential uses.
23. Chairperson Mouriquand asked about mitigation of the site. Staff
replied there will be an on -site monitor during all the grading and
trenching activities.
24. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the Commissioners felt any kind
of monitoring was warranted for the temporary use of the house.
She then asked if the house would be modified, including possibly
tearing down walls. Staff replied there would be no exterior
modification, just interior to meet the ADA, Code, and Seismic
retrofit requirements.
25. Commissioner Wright requested they save as much of the interior
as possible because that was one of the most attractive features
of the site, including the wood beams. Staff said they may have
to take out some walls because more room may be needed then
what the current rooms allow. The Agency was authorized to
negotiate with an architect and staff will not have any
information until an architect is hired.
26. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the architect could make a
presentation to the Commission as to what changes were
proposed. Staff stated they could not commit one way or the
other. That was a decision the Agency would have to ultimately
make, but would refer the request to them.
27. Commissioner Wright stated he would like the City to do as much
documentation as possible, prior to any building alterations. This
area is very historic and important to the City of La Quinta.
There's a lot of history in the Ahmanson Ranch. We should save
as much as possible. He stated it would be nice if the architect
could give the Commission a small presentation on what was
going to be done to the house. Staff stated they would forward
the request.
220 3� �
w
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
28. Chairperson Mouriquand said the Secretary of Interior Standards
would typically be the criteria applied to an adaptive re -use of a
valid historic structure or resource; bearing in mind not every
structure has to be 50 years old before it can be deemed a
significant property for preservation and proper treatment. This
Commission is interested in seeing what exactly will happen to
the structure.
29. Planning Manager Orci added this building was surveyed, and it
was not accepted or included because nothing noteworthy was
found for the building
30. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if that was based on the Mellon
survey. Staff replied it was. She replied it is our right and
privilege as a Certified Local Government to deem anything to be
of a cultural or historic significant to the City. It does not have to
be 50 years old before it is deemed locally significant.
31. Commissioner Wright asked if it was possible to document the
house with photographs before anything is done. Staff replied
that it was. He asked if the house, the pool, and the whole area
could be photographed.
32. Chairperson Mouriquand added no matter what happens to the
house there would be photo documentation including all the
outbuildings, inside and outside and a site map.
33. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright/Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2003-013 to
adopt the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the City's
SilverRock Ranch as presented with the recommendation that
photographic documentation be included in the City's Historical
database and a presentation be made to the Commission, by the
designated architect, of the updated plans for altering the Ranch
house. Unanimously approved.
C. Historic Preservation Commission Work Program
1. Planning Manager, Oscar Orci, gave an update on the Work
Program, which included the following points:
a. An updated issue of the Historic Context Statement.
Modifications will be made to the Historic Context
once all comments are received. t�
23 �-
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2003
b. Comments received from the Commission will be
incorporated into the survey. It will then be sent out to
the list of interested parties.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: None
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adjourn this Regular Meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission to the next Regular Meeting to be
held on November 20, 2003. This meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission was adjourned at 4:34 p.m. Unanimously
approved.
Submitted by,
�Q
Carolyn Walker
Secretary
r�
24 �� �,
Department Report: 1 "
w �
t jwnlr �4
c� OF
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager 1?j
DATE: December 16, 2003
SUBJECT: Department Report — Response to Public Comment
The following public comments were made at the December 2, 2003, City Council
meeting:
1. Dr. Richard Post, Dean Applied Science & Vocational/Business Education,
College of the Desert, spoke regarding College of the Desert's proposed bond
measure for $346.5 million, and asked for the City's support and endorsement.
• A Resolution supporting COD's efforts on the bond measure is before
Council today for consideration.
2. Charlie Coulter, 49-111 Washington Street, spoke regarding a sound study
at the Villas of La Quinta on Eisenhower. He stated that the study showed the
sound levels are higher than those at Laguna de la Paz, and that they have a wall.
He also questioned why Laguna de la Paz is part of the DIF, and Villas of La Quinta
is not? Finally, one of their Board members was erroneously advised that this item
would be on the agenda today. He would like to get better information regarding
the appearance of this item in the future.
• Staff sent a letter to the Villas of La Quinta on December 10, 2003, updating
the residents on the status of funding for the sound wall.
3. David Herrera, Cathedral City, spoke regarding the upkeep of his property in
La Quinta. He is concerned with the Code Enforcement requirements being
imposed upon him with regard to his property.
• The Senior Code Compliance Officer spoke with Mr. Herrera following his
comments. The case has been closed, and Mr. Herrera has agreed to check
on the property at least every other week to make sure it remains in
compliance.
Department Report: /' 13
w
v71.
YO
i =A
OF
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
DATE: December 16, 2003
RE: Department Report - Grant Update
The following is an update of various grants for which City staff has applied, will
be applying, or is currently exploring. During this calendar year, the City obtained
$810,196 in grant awards, and has applied for an additional $431,995 in grant
funding.
f California Integrated Waste Management Board
The California Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Waste
Management Board (CIWMB) provided $800,000 statewide for waste tire
playground cover grants. The City's proposal for a rubberized surface
beneath the future water feature at the La Quinta Park was approved by the
City Council on July 1, 2003. The grant application was submitted on
June 23, 2003 in the amount of $25,342. The City received notification in
November that 6 Southern California projects were set aside for the next
round of funding, with La Quinta being one of those six. CIWMB offered
assurances that the City of La Quinta would be at the top of the funding list
in May, 2004, at which time we plan to resubmit our application. The new
surface material will greatly improve child safety at the park, while reducing
the number of used tires placed in landfills.
i Department of Conservation
The California Department of Conservation provides funding for programs
that encourage recycling and litter abatement. The City Council approved
the grant application for this program on April 16, 2003. The funds from this
year's grant were used to purchase 8 recycled -content benches at the La
Quinta Park. The City was awarded $8,095 for this project on July 28,
2003.
04
f Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 2003
This program is administered by the Federal Bureau of Justice Assistance for
programs that reduce crime and improve public safety. This year the City
applied for funds on-line to purchase a 2004 BMW motorcycle enabling an
additional motor officer to be out on patrol when necessary. An award was
made in the amount of $19,218.
f State of California Proposition 12 Funding
The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal
Protection Bond Act of 2000 (2000 Bond Act), included a Per Capita grant
program of $388,000,000, and a Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris grant program of
$200,000,000. The City of La Quinta will receive a Per Capita allocation of
$176,000.00, and an RZH allocation of $56,486. On February 4, 2003,
Council allocated both amounts for the design and construction of a skate
park at the La Quinta Park. The City received authorization to proceed with
the project from the California Department of Parks and Recreation in April,
2003. Staff will submit claims for reimbursement in accordance with the
grant procedural requirements.
f State of California Proposition 40 Funding
On March 5, 2002, California voters passed Proposition 40, "The California
Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection
Act of 2002" (2002 Resources Bond), which includes a Per Capita grant
program of $372,500,000, and a Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris grant program of
$200,000,000. The City of La Quinta will receive a Per Capita allocation of
$220,000.00, and an RZH allocation of $62,172. On September 16, 2003,
Council approved the grant applications. A signed contract was submitted to
the State on October 6, 2003. Once a fully -executed contract is received
back from the State, Staff intends to identify a project and submit the
application for State approval.
i Colmac Air Quality Enhancement Fund
The Riverside Board of Supervisors offered funding through the Colmac Air
Quality Enhancement Fund `For programs that enhance air quality in the
Coachella Valley. n The City Council approved the grant application on
September 17, 2002 for funding in the amount of $36,500 to purchase and
install three weather stations to be used primarily by the Public Works
Department for monitoring PM-10 control methods. An award was made in
the amount of $25,000.
f Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee
The City has already been awarded $595,235 in funds from the Federal TEA-
21 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program. A
portion of these funds will be used in support of the PM-10 stabilization
project on Miles Avenue and Washington Street parkways. The City Council
approved an application on November 5, 2002 which seeks local match.
An award was made in the amount of $77,119 on May 30, 2003.
f Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee
The City has already been awarded AB 2766 funds that can be used for
partial payment (25%) of the cost of a CNG street sweeper. The City
Council approved an application on November 5, 2002 seeking grant funds
to supplement the cost of the new sweeper, and received an award in the
amount of $139,285.50 on June 17, 2003.
f Tony Hawk Foundation
The City applied for $25,000 in funds to supplement costs of installing the
skate park at Fritz Burns Park. The Foundation received an overwhelming
number of requests, and decided to first fund those projects that served at -
risk youth in neighborhoods with below -average median household incomes.
The City did not receive funding.
f California Department of Transportation - Safe Routes to School
On May 20, 2003, Council approved a California DOT Safe Routes to School
grant application, which was submitted by the City, acting as lead agency, in
cooperation with Desert Sands Unified School District and the City of Indio.
The project entails the placement of signalized pedestrian crossings in front
of both John Glenn Middle School and Amelia Earhart Elementary School. A
total of 84 projects were approved for funding out of more than 420
applications. The City of La Quinta was notified on November 14, 2003 that
it will receive $244,800.
f California Department of Transportation
The 2003/2004 Bicycle Transportation Account will provide $7.2 million for
cities and counties to improve safety and convenience for bicycle
commuters. The City Council approved a grant application on November 19,
2002 for funding of Class II bikeways along portions of Fred Waring, Miles
and Avenue 52 in the amount of $37,931. Notification of recipients for
r rl
40U
funding is expected prior to December 31, 2003. No funding announcement
was available as of the writing of this narrative.
f California Department of Transportation
The 2004/2005 Bicycle Transportation Account will provide $7.2 million for
cities and counties to improve safety and convenience for bicycle
commuters. The City Council approved a grant application on November 18,
2003 for funding of Class II bikeways along portions of Calle Tampico and
Avenida Bermudas in the amount of $61,550. The timeline for notification
of recipients has not yet been announced.
f Riverside County Transportation Commission
The FY 2003/04 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program set aside
an estimated $949,700 countywide for pedestrian and bicyclist
improvements. The City applied for funding of two projects: Sidewalk
improvements on Eisenhower Drive at Calle Tampico, and on Avenida
Bermudas between the Village and Fritz Burns Park. The Eisenhower Drive
improvements were not funded (placed 20' out of 44 proposals; only 19
projects were funded). The Avenida Bermudas project was recommended
for funding in the amount of $52,887.
f City of Perris — "Avo id the 30"
The City of Perris was awarded a grant entitled, "Avoid the 30" from the
California Office of Traffic Safety to fund DUI enforcement efforts in
Riverside County. The La Quinta Police Department is one of the 30
agencies participating in the program. The City's Police Department
participated in the program last year, and was reimbursed $11,040 by the
City of Perris for officer overtime in connection with the enforcement
operations. The funding has been extended to the 2003/2004 fiscal year,
with La Quinta eligible for an additional $1 1,305 during this fiscal year.
Claims for reimbursement are filed after the conclusion of each enforcement
operation.
This listing does not include subvention funds and other funds that the City
automatically receives from the Federal, State, and County governments. Examples
of this type of revenue include California Traffic Congestion Relief Funds (AB
2928), California Law Enforcement Equipment Program funds, various law
enforcement funds, Community Development Block Grant funds, COPS funds, and
various transportation -related funds.
DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3 -A
DECEMBER 16
JANUARY 6
JANUARY 19-25
JANUARY 20
FEBRUARY 3
FEBRUARY 17
CITY COUNCIL'S
UPCOMING EVENTS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOB HOPE CHRYSLER CLASSIC GOLF
TOURNAMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 18-21 LA QUINTA ART FOUNDATION ARTS
FESTIVAL
APRIL 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 20 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
4 : 83
December 2003
La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner
Sunday Ulonday
iuesaay...
...-
1 11,V_1z5UC1j
1 1 luck),.
2
3
4
5
6
6:00 PM CVAG Exec.
Cmte. - Adolph
2:00 PM City Council
Meeting
10:00 AM ALRC
12:00 PM SunLine -
,..;1
'g`I�#'� �I I• �I
Adolph
i
11:30 AM • 3:30 PM
Employees Recognition
Holiday Open House
Banquet
E
6:00 PM - 8:00 PM
iE
s i,
Christmas Tree Lighting
ly ,
Ceremony
i�
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
7:30 AM CVEP-Adolph
7:00 PM Mosquito
9:00 AM RCTC-
12:00 PM Energy/Envi-
10:00 AM Pub. Sfty-
Abate. -Perkins
Henderson
Sniff
Perkins
7:00 PM Planning
5:30 PM Investment
7:00 PM Cultural Arts
12:00 PM Transp.-
Commission
Advisory Board
Commission
Perkins
6:00 PM League -
Henderson
7:00 PM Com. Serv.
Comm.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
9:00 AM CVA-Henderson
3:00 PM Historic Preser-
2:00 PM City Council
vation Commission
Meeting
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
7:00 PM Planning
Commission
0
0
0
1st Day of Winter
Christmas Eve
Christmas Day
Extended Christmas
(City Hall OPEN)
(City Hall CLOSED)
Holiday (City Hall
CLOSED)
28
29
30
31
•8
, i, November 03 �;i January 04
3 T F S
•'
• .
!; S M T W T F S ,�I S M T W
.;..
'=G! 1 2 3
.
1
New Years Eve
(City Hall OPEN)
!�'i� 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
I 9 10 11 12 13 14 1511 12 13 14 15 16 17
i 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Printed by Calendar
Creator Plus
I 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
I
i
on 12/8/2003 rj .�
J
January
La Quinta City --Council Monthly Planner
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Fi Saturday
lIIE . 1 2 3
?!}=1`j!!!�'€ I I'il� , '•! !!!;3lilN ! !. i ; !!, ! ! I k 9:00 AM • 4:00 PM SJSR
December 03 February 04 `� Ntl. Monument-
`!EI= if I�E€=ij S M T W T F S I. € S M T W T F S! Henderson
!'• ! i;: ��!€'€i 1 2 3 4 5 6I! 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 �•
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 f€�' '• ! 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 lil New Years Day Extended New Years
€li. I
lII rl 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 j' � 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (City Hall CLOSED) Holiday (City Hall
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ; CLOSED)
I .
28 29 30 31 29
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2:00 PM City Council 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Energy/Envi-
Meeting Sniff
7:00 PM Cultural Arts
Commission
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
7:30 AM CVEP-Adolph 7:00 PM Mosquito 9:00 AM RCTC- 3:00 PM Historic Preser-
10:00 AM Pub. Sfty Abate. -Perkins Henderson vation Commission
Perkins 7:00 PM Planning 5:30 PM Investment
12:00 PM Transp.- Commission Advisory Board
Perkins
3:00 PM Mtns. Con -Sniff
6:00 PM League -
Henderson
7:00 PM Com. Serv.
Comm.
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
9:00 AM CVA-Henderson 9:00 AM LAFCO-
2:00 PM City Council Henderson
Meeting
Martin Luther King's
Birthday (CITY HALL
CLOSED)
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
6:00 PM CVAG-Exec 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG Human/
Com-Adolph Commission Comm -Osborne
12:00 PM Sunline-Adolph
4:00 PM DRRA Airp-
Osborne
in. I I ;; ON Iffliffil-J
Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 12/8/2003
r) `J 1�
February 2004
La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner
t3E MMENT REPORT:
NTQ•C
U
ffi INCOMMAIM
'm 5
ti
OF T9
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety '.
DATE: December 16, 2003
RE: Monthly Department Report - November 2003
Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control,
Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of November. The reports
depict the following highlights:
• Year to date building permit valuation is $284,154,529.28 which represents an
issuance of 3,706 building permits through November;
• 2,477 animal control cases have been handled through November;
• 2,072 code compliance cases have been initiated through November;
• 6 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in November;
• $1,840.00 - garage sale permit income in November
��4
O
�
N
S
S
S
S
O
S
S
S
S
N
ti
S
S
ti
CO)
w
to
M
O
O
O
C
O
o
O
O
O
CM
OD
ti
t7
to
�e
so
Q
69-
Ui
t;9
to
so
to
fA
iR
to
N
M
co
.-
M
O
EA
00
to
W)
to
�N
a
�
M
v
40
J
p
8
S
s�
M
8
S
S
8
S
p
O
p
O
p
O
S
S
p
O
p
O
p
O
S
M
Z
C
r`
O
C
O
C
O
O
O
O
o
6
O
O
O
o
N
H
49
fo
H
K
fo
to
fo
if1
to
if)
Ef!
44
69
49
to
N
Q
e-
N
.-
O
'(WOO
M
(Otp
M
N
$
S
M
ti
to
h
CD
to
IV
00
M
M
M
e-
O
00
M
O
(O
N
ti
r-
O
e-
N
M
M
p
O
(V
pp
N
M
cM
M
O
N
�j
00
CA
�p
O
CM
to
ti
tM
N
v
tV
co
ca
p
to
R
r
M
o
et
Q
In
00
N
H
C7
to
tG
to
to
ti
p
�
N
(o
�
to
T-
oD
O
N
to
to
N
6
v
0
(V
r-
00
r`
M
0
O
O
W
tH
to
Mali
fig
to
to
Nita
64
K
to
0
ti
w
p
O
N
t�
O
pp
8
p
8
p
8
op
O
p
O
N
v
coo,
w
w
=
N
O
'v
tt:�9
coM
O
CV
co
M
r-
M.
O
O
N
00
(N
O
CD
a0
a
z
8v'►
v
to
p
to
R
tt
v�
w
m
m
ono
�
p
K
S
O
S
CO
0
N
00
0
tiO
W)
U
O
ti
O
MfM
tV
p
to
CO
co
(D
O
f
$
to
p
�
0
to
mMM
�N
co
of
Q
M
o
Z
Q
C
ti
M
N
1�
M
M
N
ti
�
�
ti
(o
W"
.-
O
ti
V.
CM
v
(O
O
(Q
Cl)
N
tV
Z
J
Cl�
ou
to
to
.-
>
N
e-
iH
(O
co
O
r
N
to
at[[77
1
M
�
(fi
O
cV
K
iH
t�?
to
tq
gym
1wi
1".
lc,41
."I
O
a
>
-_'
o
io•
cQi
cqi,
tgi
S
S
c`nn
to
c�'i,
g
N
�
�'
N
Z
O
Z
Q
0p0
�
ti
00
ti�p
(V
00
g
e-
M
to
M
0
V
Q
Z
00
N
M
tN
M
O
O
.~-
(?
M
O
00
H
tip
M
co
.-
Mto
M
T-
to
H
M
M
O
O
�
ci
M
r
vv
ra
0
j
�t
m
=
�
Crj
�
iH
to
CN7
U)
t�
a0
V-
mi
1!,
144ki
C,4
F-
CO)
O
pp
O
t��
p
O
p
O
p
O
S
pp
pp
pp
S
S
pp
O
M
O
COO
O
O
(O
(O
M
ton
(V
M
0
H
e-
N
ti
e-
O
IV
8
K
�
to
M
4H
O
IT
L6
e-
e-
pp��
O
to
It.
�
04
h
O
h
ZO
00
CV
N
N
M
N
to
o0
O
M
ti
Cr)
O�
O
N
g
O
(Y)
M
O
W
2
C7
tR
iMA
tN
E�H
6NA
ti
61%
N
w
fR
to
to
m
icil
iH
F
�y
O
c0
cV
N
(O
M
eP
tL)
M
e-
M
w
O
N
co
IV
to
M
M
r-
.-
IT
N
O
N
to
t-
t0
e0
J
co
to
N
N
N
`-
O
N
co
m
co
h
W
Z
J
Z
J
~
w
U
-�
W
J
w
Z
w�Wo
NQOO
M
.-
o
o
.-
OD
rnp.-�o�
10
N
r_-o
o
w
Q
w
w
o
4.
J
o
W
¢
U
J
J
Q
O
J
Z
Q
J
�
a
Q
w
Q
v
Z
z
a
I--
g
O
LL
M
Z
z
0
O
W
J
W
Z
Z
U
Q
to
J
J
W
W
J
W
0
J
Z
O
1,01
lul
ILU
v�
g
O
U
o
m
O
U
J
w
w
�
J
a
O
a
w
o
�
Q
a
Q
C�
Z
v�
O
U
w
�
w
�
H
r�n
ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: November,
2003
Steve Alexander, Jackie Misuraca and Moises Rodarte
Animal Pickups
YEAR TO
YEAR TO
INCIDENTS
YEAR TO
YEAR TO
DATE 03
DATE 02
HANDLED
DATE 03
DATE 02
Doas
Alive 35 344
319
Bite Reports
3
36
40
Dead 13 84
63
Animal Trap
OTI 1 34
16
Set Ups
5
74
58
Cats
Alive 23 195
198
Cruelty to
Dead 4 74
68
Animals
0
3
6
OTI 0 3
8
Other Animals
Alive 2 95
131
Vicious Animal
Dead 3 70
72
Restraining
0
0
2
OTI 0 1
0
TOTAL ANIMALS
Special Hour
Patrols
0
11
40
Alive 60 634
648
Zoning
0
12
6
Dead 20 228
203
Lost/Found
32
419
386
OTI 1 38
24
Animal Rescue
2
18
22
Outside Agency
0
6
4
TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED
City Reclaims
10
144
116
Other
6
166
183
81 900
875
TOTALS
58
889
863
VIOLATIONS:
NO OWNER
WARNINGS
CITATIONS
Dogs at Large
20
0
16
Noise Disturbance
0
0
0
Defecation Removal
0
0
0
License Violation
0
0
21
Other
0
0
0
MONTHLY TOTAL
20
0
37
YEAR TO DATE
234
21
433
TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED:
Nov 03: 196
Nov 02: 228
TOTAL YEARLY INCIDENTS HANDLED:
Nov 03: 2477
Nov 02: 2318
cam., ' 3
CODE COMPLIANCE STAT REPORT FOR November
Nov 03 YEAR TO DATE 03 YEAR TO DATE 02
ABATEMENTS:
Nuisance Abatements
Started
76
1235
1976
Weed Abatements
Started
9
115
164
Vehicle Abatements
Started
44
708
872
Dwelling Abatements
Started
2
14
36
TOTAL STARTED
131
2072
3064
TOTAL
COMPLETED
132
1784
2718
Case Followups
323
4823
3805
Home Occupation
Inspections
16
141
111
Business License
Inspections
0
1
0
Garage Sale
Permits Issued
184
1568
1484
4
000000
N N N N N N
� � � OO�
�
y N N N
Z
qZ
W
J
U
w
Z
CO w
J
0
_ Z w
aw Ir O cD
�� W Z
} J
,per}Q>LU
lQIxwU3 o
�Uaccco =
rncornMLOrn
1-NCC) 04Cv)
(DNO00
mONU)e-I-O
0�e=
�000 00
icococo co co
m
�QaaQQQ
�UUUUUU
HH�HHH
Z555555
ZZ Z Z Z
2C'10C1000
co U
w w
I- F-
CO NCO o
H W UJ
�
D
CO N co
IYZZH<
mOO�w J
ozz co
�w
w Z J
>QaQQO
�Q���U�
00 O In .-- ;q .-
000p000O�00
QZ
W
J U
U Z
Z H
H co O W
0Zw w = Q Z
M LLi
O J O Z
j N <
�OE a:�z 2
C m (D C0 aJ0
5Jo U)aZj=
J N p m�aF'��Q
-j uj :)
Um2 m10wOQ00
3 U a Q)>}
C O N 014
N O W
O d O to 0 co
O OO O 9 O 9
4
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2003
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2003
Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Department Report which
outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of November.
P:\Monthly Report Folder\NOV 2003.doc
9
c. 1 1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT REPORT
NOVEMBER 2003
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
CUP'S
0 submitted
Development Agreements
0 submitted
Environmental Assessments
6 submitted
General Plan Amendment
0 submitted
Lot Line Adjustments
1 submitted
Minor Adjustments
1 submitted
MUP's
5 submitted
Parcel Maps
1 submitted
Parcel Mergers
1 submitted
Sign Permits
9 submitted
Site Development Permits
2 submitted
Specific Plans
0 submitted
Tentative Tract Maps
2 submitted
TUP's
7 submitted
Zone Change
0 submitted
Zoning Code Amendments
1 submitted
�3g
P:\Monthly Report Folder\NOV 2003.doc �'
l
O
H
V
Q
-a
O
C
.O O
U
a�
rn
° ��
N
rn M M° o
COO rn�
�p� a)
CNNL V
_ V- CA_
V- .-- C:C
U
Q=a. cnU
M M
�0
��
N
QUO
-0
oc
C
O O C
p
• '>
0 'N
>
O +.+
a
a>'�
c
I L- y
CY) co
O
j
1 (D N
c^
U a-� - M
Qmm
C
Q
*�0,,
a)
—
>,
O
M
O
p. M
E
O LO
C00
>
a
Q
(M
N
.-
a
N
>
O
Q>
Q o
I a
cM Q
O
LOM
.-0
N
U �-
Qa
M
O
M
N
r-
a.
,cC N
E
C O O
+� C
O
'
M
O O
4-
co
c� M
.0 E
_
U
a°
co
co
X
o
O cc CD 'a
J c�
,•
cn
m
� +�
o w
ao N
Co v
r-
a� V�
0
O•
EO
-P
�}'
O
i
O
O
cc Q
U E C
'y
O N C
fl.
C O
a) O
0 O
c
•y =
CL O
LO
V
.�
- t O +,
C
'N
C
O
O C
d'
>
C
0 '
Co
O a)
cc
M\
y a)
ca
O
Co
O 0
y cn O
p.
O
a) N %� -a
°
0
a
>
L +r V-
O
@O
"°
a—
Co-
N
sE
oO
rn
Ocv
�
O
o_Cc
� cv
c0M
v
}°,
O
�
_C
00
c p
LO
OJO
+
0
—>
.N cn
r- cn o a)
'O I\ —
c
co
L + j
+-+ v
J
E 0 O j
Q — -a
C
O
s U)
p"
�
M 00
�- 00
Z
+�.+
a)
O r
L
O U OLO
�`
�
c cn O C
N
Cl)OcOn
M
4- C+
O O
C
�
+'' e— L
Cl)
Ci
>• N�
0°
a. CD O C
�L
0 �O
O �O
` N
° N
C—
.}'
C
p CO) i
c
M
>� M 'a
y
-a C
c4n C C
s
0
�+-
j O
0>
0
00
E
Q
U
a ca
O
'>
O O
c c QN
L-
a
+O, .c
m 0
O
co
a• vs
° °
o
aM
O
O
a —
•�
O c0
Q��OC
o_
C7
O
cn.0
O
�C7�
o o CL M?
cvr•�
0
0
O
0
O
r-
CL O O
QV-�Q�
a. ° +-,
cvfn
Q
w
rn�
-a
00
C
Ch M
+ram
0 00
OO
N N
M
4*
E M
'I Q n'
O
N
W
c`a0
��U
U
O
E-i
M
M
CL a.
c
N
Q
t\
>'U
—
O�N
cnrIlft
N c
0
a
.� 00N
O
��co
d' � �
o
1 0
0
N
till
O
�
`00MOO
m0000
O
O•�
d M
O
0000
a. 0
E
O c
�Q
.J000
N
o-NN
.+��
O
N�
C
M
p
a.
'4)
�n1
O
ID
��
°
o�
M a-
Y
Q (n 0
N3:
W N U)
I-
0
z
v
b
O
r4
O
cx
0
z
Z
U
Q
o
O
Q
Q
N
U
a
O
o.
Q
MN
N
V
O
O
__O
co
N
U V
a U
> o
CL a
QQ
t�MM�
0 0
�O
�
OCN
J U U
Q a U
O> C
o. o. C
QQU
M I
OC�pMCMC�MM
p00
M 00 co
N_O
a U U U
2 a U U
V
O
CL
C
M
O
N
•�
co
_(")
O
U
O
'a
C O
�
Cl)c�
}'
N
co
coo
to
V C
N NO o
+� L-
v 0 a 4)*O-
0 C)�t
L
O
p .+
Co +Cn
7
>0
O
C U M VO
co
c+ OoN 0�
n�}'� O
m>
cN
Vca
o0)
U
O
C
CM CD'D p E
C
C -jeO
O
_s
C OO'O+Jy
MHs
orn O
c0 0
C
> o
a N �O
4-0- o CU
c o
c M n
Z
oco
-v (D
o C
.� CYi
N � �
o�°
aO
cc
�
o
.fz
o p
O +,
��a� cc
oo
ca
0c)m
�
a
Cacc
o Ec-0o
L,�
o
+r >a�
U
NL
N
LO
C{+ �U++ O
•"0 >O v
Cc`ao
p
�
OO
C`
E
,O
CE
o C
cr C
U'0
�Ni Co
�
"o o o
w
C
.
CD a'
O O
.CU
O M
N
•O cr
O N
.CoOQ
onO
o
OO
C
c ++
> 0
4-1E
N L 'a 'a
Q S
L�
+-
U
O cO
O
++
p LO o (n
C
o C o
CO� CCN0
OU_
LL
+-►
L
+a-' C
O O
a oz oso O
`'`o ``'o
n
a
O
CO
O
O
ONC
O
O
�OOOL.000 NO
0N
c
o
_O+a O-�o�o
0 0a
L. �
.
-O Q i a
c o Q
ccc
o-�
o
QL ci •+�
C�>
N�
N
C
a).(aO-
U co
.+p�„
n ca
c0
O U
(O(")
�a
C) O
N
0 0
M
co M ('M
O
N N
4*
CI
=OO
U
a)'a
�o
�NN
Q a
J°
p
M
o-
°'
MEOu
UoaU)
cn
0
ca
.cao
O
C;
'
co
C) N
=O
O
UO
()0
o�
Lf)(0N
N
c
�
N
(n
o
o
N
O
.OQ
co
c`O
o°°
>oo
�O
E
ioNNO
�M(n
rnM
�MM
o
NNMe-
o0p
0(I
p0
2
•c
LN
WW.WY�
IU
�NF—
U.- W
Ur-O
F—(n
�
CL
2P
0
v
x
0
Z
�_
C�
Q
-0 �3
> > c
O 0.-
C a cCL
aQU
Q
I M
00M4
00
�CV ��
C)O N
13-
2 0.. U U
O
M
`
U
a
00
MO
\ N
UVUV
a U
M
—0
�N
a V
'p
�
0 �
C �o
` O
a a
I I
M CV)
d'�
��
0 V-
UVUV
a U
M
�0
NO
N
N`
a U
M
�40
NO
� N
N\
UUU
a U
n
N
a
N
N
a M
O
v M
N
c c
N y
E
0 N
`—
O co
O M
o
c
o
.0
0
cv
c0 (p
t
OE'`�
NU
s
°'
`
0No�'
>,
o
_>
4-�o`-°a
�a
.0L--c
(a2
56��c
Cc
°
E-0M
%-
o
E
O
UOc
> aD
cnc-cUnC Cc000
o}o
C0'
� c
O a
O
O 0o
0
oNa
c o
E
C
rn
c
�
c
o>
c
D
a
.c>N
.
EO
'
0(n
>
0
0.0
p=OE
c
p n
i
c
O
0
C
o
o
0
,0
ECO
-0
E
a.O O
C Cl O
OC
'�,
Cy
cu
cu
cu
'a C) aJ �
C co -0 L
N
O +_
N
O
cv
'
co +.,
c
00 4—
O
M p
U
Z
I� N
E .O C O
E N
'�
V
.0
.N
ui
M
In
M N
.V
CY)
°0
(n
E0
o
C N+I
O
o �
o
`-
CO
aOC
o-
>Q °
rn>
�
•
•°
o
-C>
'0o°yO
c
v
p >
C
cv
°C
Oau
'cn
>
rn+
c N
CL
C E
>O
r
>o
a�
0
a�
w
cn
W
c
c � c � �
O C O 0 0 4"1
c
O
>
O
c� c
-C N
o
+�
�
7°
.a4-0
7
a
C-
O
p
C7 p � cn °
c
oC
V p
(n
(n c
cn c�
Q
cn
�
au
U
O
U
N
E
CC)M
N
M
N
O
U
0
M
M
(0
a)
CO
0
O
0
M
O
C
r
r-
r-
(i
M
a
00
V-
N
Ntj
-CO
Q
Q
F
F-
V
F-
m�M
0
E
CN
O�
��'-
�N
U
~
>UM
s
U
�LO
NN
-J
cc 0)
�a)
O
J�00
@MUM
UCM
.'
UM
L)
W
�fiF-
=MH
O
—N'�
+0.,
c
ICY)
00M
c0
00
�0
m0
�0
m0'>.2
cvZ
00
0
c LO
Za
0
?�Q0
pN
CN
VN
��
ON
+-
CL
a
.OQ�
a w •-
O�
JONUC7W
�(n�W
2W
�a
�W
L
Le
a)
b
O
w
4J
O
04
aa)
4J
O
O
Q
c
E
O
U
O
O
O
a
N
.N
L
M
c
O
.N
.>
N
L
Cl)N
.O
CL
c
E
O
U
v�
O c
C
O CL
y
O
a
.N
L
>'
M
O
CL
a
M
O
LO
N
U)
�
O
`'
0
�,,.
O M
V—
V-
"a
(D �►
p. C
Q M
N >
O
L
CL CL
aQ
Q
cn
0
� 00
O
CL U
-p
0
O
L
a
CL
Q
�-
O
CL
>
O
CL
Q
cn
0
LO
N
a.
U)
v)
c
O
c
13
c V
O
O
+
"o
.n
o
L O
C
� LO
+,
U p
LO 0
C
._
d
LO
p
U
`
ca
co
O
E 5
+'' C
M
cn
L QJ
- C
M
M
C'
'�
cEn
c
M
a�
o, c.)
-
O
a
o
00
+, >
�, Q
o o
p cn
.«-
O
L
-a
>
+�
c
>
N O
L
o Q
o LO
,�..
O
c
+=
U --
(n
o f
y i
c
C N
U +'
0 0
L
.>.
L •C
L
L
N O
U
O N
E
C-
O N
O
a.
N
'co
d
-v ca
c 0
M ,�
p
U 'o
'� �
o
E .�-
L_
o
a
M
M
L
o c�
— c
'co
M C
���
�'. L
M• c.)
Qi
M�
w J
Z
+r
C c N
pp c
%- L
a
O
> N
O`
—
U c�
0 0
+r
0
�
L
N
O
O�
O O
C U
E
V E
0
_
0
0
. U
.CD +-�
c N
—
I—
o.
p >. c•
cc
O N
O
0
+, U
L
M >,
N
-o o
•�
w
++
C O E
N
O
cc
Na.
au �°-'
M M>
O
O
au �
E
p cv
Q=A
V) CQw>OOCQ
C72(%)UQ•.-CL
cn
F-CL
CL
rn
00
N
N
Ch
+'
L
c0
O
E
0
r
0-
U�
cci
O
C
E—
�v
J�
E E
Ecan
>`�
C
c�
o
O
C N
C
C
O M
oc;
��
d�
M
�O
0 0
E.0
O M
X� cv)
0 0
0
>0cv)
Q O
�N
cn
J O
��O
O N
>N
0 0
L
=N
�0
�N
0N00
CN
�M
ON
�00
°N
CN
C
o
E
E
m
sZ
�Q
o�
cJn0
MD=CL
�O
+Q
J
IL
F-cn
ww
n>
>Ccno02UF-F-UNWW
cncn
z
a)
ro
O
w
4J
O
x
0
- J
JU
Z
O
C�
Q
+-+
N
y
o
Z
.c
� � a
a �
QaCL aa
Q Q
M'
00 00
N
i 0 �-'
U r
U U
Qa.0
c
o
c
N
0
O
rn cv
c o
ca a
m
M
0
�
(1)
'm
E
1-
O
c
O
'4;
a°i
O
U
0
O
V
6.
°
O
C
c0
a
a�
N
�Q
oC
N
O
U
�- a°,,
° 0
° o
O•�-
a�
a�
c s
a�
U
co d- }'
M
'a
�°
'
O c
+r
CL
.0
C
0
O O
0
Q
V'
O
4)C
cc
O
�
O 'a
-Op
N
+-+ Q
O
N O
C
� -p
N
c M c
N U
►..
c c �
cv Q% L
cv
C
O
C 4-C•
N C
U
m
a
0
°O>
m°
0°'E00It
<c
°
N
'a
0
00
cn
U p +.i
C
O
CO N.-
y 7 LA
M'O
V
Q 00
•� d•
4`.
c0 L
vo +�
O W
0 c) cv
N N
M 4-0
�-
`-
L- y +�
a m
C °
e
_ O
0 w- %
_
�. °�
� C
°
C
C
ccn
m
%'+C-
LC
a°
0
p
N
0U c
O
O.B
°
C
O C
D
p
C•+
+0,LO CD
C
�
O C U
° o
ca +
O +
ccn
co N
N
co
0(D O
O
OcC
c
°
Cc
o
-
CcVn�
cE�t
CCA
M°Co
o
F-LL
4- a
(n mJM0-
++oG
0 m
F
U
~ CY)
'5
�►
LO
Z
o0
'�
cv0
}' .—
°
Eou)
+r
dN
'�
O- N
0 `- C(O
c
O
C
cn
i
J U)
a
jM
L
a�
O
y
a�0
C
a�M>M
M
��000
F--
��
EN
(p O N
C
Cl)d'
M
O M
t�
OCMO~O
CO
M
>O
uj
,J~
O �m
cv00(n
•�N
M
Op
4)N
.0
(D
Z
�
�
�
C
cu
m
!!
CL
a
UN0(nLLiMr%
J(n
I-
(nY
O
O
z
av
ro
0
w
4J
0
a
4J
0
z
cc
O
m
W
V+
D
a
V
W
01
O
a.
.J
a
C.�
W
a
00
0
O
a;
O
to
CY)
r-
C
cfl
co
LO
O
3
V C
O
O.0
0)
�j
O
0
to E
N
�
O
00
w
0
a�
E G
O
C) o
c
c
c
00
0
�
rn
00
C
O
O
cv
Q
+
o
0
n
0
O
Ln
w
00
(�
Ch
X
+r
4)
4)
w
O cn
♦,
•y
O
cc
V
1 cc
000
c
m
FL
U C.) 0
o)
rn
c c
a �°
am
aci
Q(DD00
J
J
C
N
.a
C
O
=
O
O
�
CO
00
a)
C
le
C
L
U
c)
u-
C
J
c
•E
m
>
O
^
W
2
^C
A
im
DEPARTMENT REPORT:
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CO NCIL
FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECT0
DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2003
SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2003
UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR
THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2004:
Jan 6
*Adult CPR & First Aid Class
Jan
12
Yoga Flex Class, Senior Center
Jan
12
*Stained Glass Class
Jan
12
* Hatha Yoga
Jan
12
Pilates, Senior Center
Jan
12
Microsoft Excel, Senior Center
Jan
12
Ballroom Dance, La Quinta High School
Jan
13
*Tap Dance Class
Jan
13
*Arthritis Tai Chi
Jan
13
* Dog Training
Jan
13
Italian for Travelers, Senior Center
Jan
13
Adobe Photoshop Advance Course, Senior Center
Jan
13
Tae Kwon Do, Senior Center
Jan
13
Hatha Yoga, Senior Center
Jan
13
Exploring the World of Travel, Senior Center
Jan
14
*Beginners Conversational Spanish
Jan
14
*Creative Writing Class
Jan
14
*Introduction to the Computer
Jan
14
*Introduction to the Internet Computer Class
Jan
14
*Digital Photography Computer Class
Jan
14
Bellydance Lessons, La Quinta High School
Jan
14
Line Dance Lessons, La Quinta High School
Jan
14
Somatic Yoga, Senior Center
Jan
14
Dog Obedience Course, La Quinta Park
Jan
14
Beginning Computers, Senior Center
Jan 14
Interior Decor, Senior Center
Jan 15
*Chili Cook -off Luncheon
Jan 15
Adobe Photoshop Introductory Course, Senior Center
Jan 16
*Nutrition Class - Diet & Disease
Jan 16
*Decorative & Faux Painting Workshop
Jan 20
*AARP Driver Safety Program
Jan 21
*Sketching/ Drawing Class
Jan 22
*Ballroom Dance Workshop
Jan 23
*Evening Ballroom Dance/ Social
Jan 31
Algodones, Mexico Excursion
*Daytime Senior Center class or activity
Community Services Department
Attendance Report for the Month of November 2003
Summary Sheet
Program 2003 2002 Variance Sessions Per Month
2003 2002
Leisure Classes
56
55
1
18
27
Special Events
258
273
-15
3
4
Adult Sports
491
347
144
18
19
Senior Center
1339
1427
-88
107
113
Total
21"
2102
42
146
163
Senior Services
Senior Center
351
503
-152
23
18
Total
351
503
-152
23
18
Sports Complex Use
AYSO
420
1650
-1230
14
20
Diamond Ringers
75
0
75
4
0
Jr. All American Football
125
0
125
10
0
Total
620
1650
-1030
28
20
LQ Community Park
AYSO
980
0
980
18
0
Total
980
0
980
27
0
Facility/Park Rentals
Senior Center
(Private Pa
400
0
400
2
0
(Churches)
690
0
690
10
0
LQ Community Park
(Private Pa
280
0
280
7
0
Fritz Bums Park
Private Pa
40
0
40
1
0
Total
1410
0
1410
20
0
Total Programs
5,505
49255
1250
2441
201
Veluriteer Hours
Senior Center
3611
539
-178
Total Volunteer Hours
3611
539
-178
j i 3
Mnnthly Ravanaaa _ Facility Rentals
Senior Center
$
2,080.00
$ -
$
2,080.00
Parks
$
400.00
$ -
$
400.00
Total Facility Revenue
$
2,480.00
$ -
$
2,480.00
Mnnthly Ravanue
Senior Center
$ 9,422.50
$ 8,185.00
$ 1,237.50
Community Services
$ 1,513.00
$ 2,203.00
$ 690.00
Total Revenue
$ 109935.50
$ 10,388.00
$ 547.E
12imummio Your to nata
Senior Center
$ 42,926.75
$ 33,218.00
$ 9,708.75
Communi Services
$ 49,763.00
$ 27,693.00
$ 22,070.00
Total Revenue to Date
$ 929689.75
$ 60,911.00
$ 312778.75
J
Community Services Program Report for November 2003
2003 2002 2003 2002
Participants
Participants
Variance
Meetings
Meetings
Leisure Classes
Mastering the Internet
6
0
6
1
0
Adobe Photoshop Elements
2
7
-5
2
3
Tae Kwon Do
16
8
8
4
6
Hatha Yoga
14
20
-6
1
6
Pilates
9
0
9
4
0
Adobe Photoshop Advance
1
0
1
2
0
Totals
561
35
21
18
15
2003 2002 2003 2002
Participants
Participants
Variance
Meetings
Meetings
Special Events
Carlsbad Village Faire
17
15
2
1
1
Getty Museum
16
0
16
1
0
Veterans Day Tribute
225
0
225
1
0
Totals
268
15
243
3
1
2003 2002 2003 2002
Participants
Participants .
Variance
Meetings
Meetings
Adult Sports
Open Gym Basketball
271
207
64
14
15
Adult Soccer League
1 2201
140
80
4
4
Totals
1 4911
347
144
181
19
Recreation Totals 8051 3971 4081 391 35
JS
Senior Center Attendance
Participation
Participation
Variance
Meetings
Meetings
2003
2002
2003
2002
Senior Activities
ACBL Bride
136
231
-95
4
4
Ballroom Dancing, Complimentary
18
11
7
1
1
Bridge, Duplicate/Social
538
481
57
14
14
Dog Training, Complimentary
10
6
4
1
1
Monthly Birthday Party
29
28
1
1
1
Monthly' Luncheon
100
106
-6
1
1
Movie Time
44
44
0
3
5
Seminars
27
9
18
4
1
Senior Activity Total
902
916
-14
29
28
Senior Leisure Classes
Arts and Crafts
27
29
-2
3
4
Ballroom Dance
15
23
-8
3
2
Bridge Lessons
45
61
-16
8
6
Ceramics
8
29
-21
3
3
Computer
41
29
12
17
Computer Tutor
4
7
-3
4
7
CPR
9
0
9
1
0
Dog Training Class
14
12
2
1
2
Exercise
50
54
-4
12
11
Golden Tones
45
56
-11
3
4
Knitting
11
16
-5
1
1
Quilting.
24
35
-11
3
3
Rug Hooking
8
13
-5
4
4
Sketching/Drawing
14
25
-11
4
4
Stained Glass
10
11
-1
5
2
Tai Chi
20
14
6
6
2
Tap Dance
26
21
5
6
3
Watercolor
29
15
14
4
3
Woodcarving
23
29
-6
3
4
Yoga
14
32
-18
4
3
Senior Leisure Classes Total
437
511
-74
78
85
TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS
1339
1427
-88
107
113
Senior Services
0
AARP "55" Course
16
32
-16
2
2
FIND Food Distribution
292
365
-73
4
5
Hearing Consultation
6
1
5
6
1
I.I.D. Energy Assistance
23
9
14
5
4
I.I.D. Energy Assistance/No fee
3
4
-1
3
2
Legal Consultation
7
10
-3
1
1
Medicare/Hi Cap Consultation
4
9
-5
2
3
Volunteers
73
-73
n/a
n/a
TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES
351
503
-152
23
18
SENIOR CENTER TOTAL
1690
1930
-240
1301
131
on
•
Department Report: r7— A
�Ilaj� Q�C •
Inooeau��
nu �
of9
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director
DATE: December 16, 2003
RE: Sales and Use Tax Confidentiality
At the December 2, 2003 City Council meeting, the parameters of disclosing sales and use
tax information were discussed.
Rutan & Tucker has prepared an analysis of this matter from Attachments 1 through 5
listed below, which is on the next two pages.
Attached please find the rules to which the City of La Quinta adheres, Revenue and Tax
Code 7056, which are included in the following attachments:
Attachment 1 — Sales Tax Confidentiality .... Following the Rules....
Attachment 2 — Authorization to Review Confidential Sales and Use Tax
Information Section 7056 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
Attachment 3 — Resolution No. 2002-70 — A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of La Quinta, California Authorizing Examination of Sales and Use Tax
Records
Attachment 4 - Staff report dated May 21, 2002 entitled Approval of a Resolution
Authorizing Access to Sales and Use Records Pursuant to Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 7056
Attachment 5 - Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7056
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you.
YI
::':
,TAN
:i-a•. .$mom y'
�M� R
. .... . ... .
' CKER.,
ATTORNEYS
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
611 ANTON BOULEVARD, FOURTEENTH FLOOR, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1931
DIRECT ALL MAIL TO: POST OFFICE BOX 1950, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92628-1950
TELEPHONE 714-641-5100 FACSIMILE 714-546-9035 INTERNET ADDRESS www.nitan.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of La Quinta City Council
FROM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney k T b j
Michael R.W. Houston, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: December 8, 2003
RE: Sales Tax Confidentiality Under Revenue & Taxation Code Section 7056
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an overview of California Revenue and
Taxation Code section 7056 ("Section 7056), which generally prohibits any person from
disclosing information contained on sales or use tax returns.
Section 7056 provides that it is "unlawful for the ... [Board of Equalization], any person
having an administrative duty under this part or any person who obtains access to information
contained in, or derived from, sales or transactions and use tax records of the board pursuant to
subdivision (b), to make known in any manner whatever the business affairs, operations, or any
other information pertaining to any retailer or any other person required to report to the board or
pay a tax pursuant to this part, or the amount or source of income, profits, losses, expenditures,
or any particular thereof, set forth or disclosed in any return ...." (Cal. Rev.& Tax. Code
§ 7056(a) (emphasis supplied).)
In effect, Section 7056 strictly prohibits unauthorized parties from obtaining sales tax
information and prohibits authorized parties from disclosing this confidential information to
other persons or using such confidential information for an unauthorized use. See e.g., Sav-On
Drugs, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. (1975) 15 Cal. 3d 1, 6 [Section 7056 "manifest[s] a clear legislative intent
that disclosures made in tax returns shall not be indiscriminately exposed to public scrutiny"].
Confidential information that is legitimately obtained may only be used for "the purposes
related to the collection of local sales or transactions and use taxes ... or for purposes related to
other government functions of the ... city ...." As discussed in Attachment 1 to the report of
the Finance Director, there are certain rules that permit aggregated information to be provided to
the public without violating Section 7056.
The unauthorized provision of the confidential information described above constitutes a
misdemeanor. (Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 7056.5.)
2156/015610-0002
457107.02 a12/08/03
2
The Honorable Mayor and Members of La
Quinta City Council
December 8, 2003
Page 2
Section 7056 permits counties and cities to obtain this confidential information by
entering into an agreement with the Board of Equalization. Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 7056(b).
The City of La Quinta has such an agreement with the Board. See City Resolution No. 2002-70
(Attachment 3) and the Board Authorization Letter (Attachment 2). Under Section 7056 only a
"duly authorized officer or employee of the county, city and county, city or district, or other
person designated by that resolution" may examine confidential tax records. Presently, pursuant
to Resolution No. 2002-07 and Board approval, only the City Manager, Finance Director,
Accounting Manager and Account Clerk are permitted to review confidential information in
sales and use tax returns. No other persons at the City of La Quinta are authorized to obtain or
use the sales tax information relating to a particular taxpayer.
Section 7056 only allows those listed in the approved resolution to obtain access to
confidential sales tax information. See Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 7056(b) ["Expect as otherwise
provided herein, this subdivision shall not be construed to allow any officer, employee, or other
person authorized or designated by a county, city and county, city or district to examine any
sales or transaction and use tax records of a taxpayer." (emphasis supplied).] Therefore, should
the City Council desire to revise who at the City has authorization to view confidential sales tax
information, a new resolution and Board of Equalization approval would be required.
2156/015610-0002
457107.02 a12/08/03
`� 3
From:NdL CWAWIES 9W 861 772 02/24.M 04:41 #315 P,00202
ATTACHMENT 1
909l61 3
SALES TAX CONMMMALT'I"Y'
.... FOWWIV4 the Rube ... .
Sties tau ,des is requited by Seadon 70M of tbt Ravoaua and Taxadon Cod* to be Dept
confideatial, In Smarm, it is unlawful for any Amon who obtainer access to seta and us*
retds 0a:=b known. ittmy:r t'afortnation +.ter r
atrludi�a� *stmwt tl +of. 7ui miean3 ttiit the local ju dietion may not disclose
aauom of tax paid, wbedwr eaounts puler as up cc dm f m a prior period, ar any
other ifbrtaoa that would reveal the btesiu a affairs or operations of a particular
'ai by _ law, saln toad use tax infannstioa : can bo vsed by local
vials if tbs lose is "slated to of local sales and an lasers" or
�„; ,u �otd litnatioAe of tbs co�gesty, stir, and county, or city."
taost of oar client jW#dictions p�vtt , linanca n nvmnue
saaapwrs, eco►aovaia �f } � egad ca�aa�aauaity
deval t `I Iics :` °�o* `VaCes to loot salas sod
un taz allo+catioa iafarreu i� .
} �'A�d:'st is xrnlUirred to abxds3 by
the provisions of ft%ft 70M.
r` opacs,n� iu tb�e jar.0 ' . ' (but not the top 4, at bidlaw).
�Y"t.,y ., �� ,�YA;+��,i ��k�^�`aN �kk`N�:;C 1 ¢,� or ?Y� � ���5:;6~�.s.7'�✓#d as�-:�,h i i:.l,t; a �.:� !r 1r'}��/! �. ,., �'T 1' +�xu%t/'•h ha M,F>°�: ��.n 3.s �. �a'" m Fi ,�"._.� .�� .r r5.'a��* �k':? ,
IOU�"^ [yys � 3t+tc' 'r ."` :.� • �. go x r yr exr �fi , t
x�E•t+�.x, R�., ter„ .,,o- ._ ?� �, r f. ,a 7,4r ! ?fi .{ti �s tR � jk
trs<. ;,,,."Sr�ia,,,,,-c.M' �:.�J1K�a•s:-'•4 r ..�xx'jv�;'fi,'��,..
x ,
er, C ...h., r sY�. x7u., a.,� r.x !. Vc:., � ! $� r, \;i ,4,�,,, w .., .. ... , , S i. •�, �c,, � ,.n. r, kK ,. ALL.. � .•'r T'r,�
� 3,uk x adA:+'La �•P. � ��a:, i.� .. � arcu�': ��t,.� .gyp- � i r,t. s,
,�• ,� 1 1 r 5'bt � �.� b ).. � 2 ,rY F � �. a ti pixy �r r X '^ � j , �.t r M .�.°� a t '� ri ^" �q �, 4 y{ f � Y .'• �'p' �.y r a r ��` ,w, p� :s1 t^.: .t ��
1 .J 4
{'.r C: %n t0.; +.G t L re l ,,.1. ! �C? , S;^?' ., r t t. +SsR •:•Y. ., ... ., �t , :
n7: ��Y1 4:'r 5 1i � 3k1 ul. ;xf ui1'a 7 to y. e y� et k+�� 7 A ;r ,.y. >va y'r:. zy k�fnu k A!%�Yh•9 yi N.>'V S .Rn
.M'... Sr,, .,d�na7..sxi A...'�n}k :x r /V
Ank
ATTACHMENT 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD -OF EQUALIZATION
f
JOHANKLEHs
LOCAL REVENUE ALLOCATION SECTION ' -
First District, Hayward
450 N STREET, MIC 27, SACt Ek ENTO, CAUFORp
OEM ANDAL
.._ »
(PO BOX 942879. SACI AWENTO, CAlI�`fi�KNIA'94'2'7" Olii7�
..
Second District, Stockton
TELEPHONE (916) 324.31W"' . a
�. CLAUDE PARRISH
FAX91a 3 4
( ) 2 -3001
, . Third Distr;cL San DwW
www.boe.ca.gov
JOHN CHUWG
F District, Los Angeles
May 29 2002
.
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Amy Swan �Jr�Per
, �. _ . � State CorNroN.r, secrm.nto
. .w
Accounting Manager
�' �;
JAMES E. SPEED
City of La Quints
Executive Director
P. O. Box 1504
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
TAC., 33060
Authorization to Review Confidential Sales and Use Tax Information
Section 7056 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
We have received a copy of your contract with Hinderliter de Llamas & Associates (HDL) and Resolution
2002-70, dated May 21, 2002, which authorizes the examination of Cooftdential Sales and Use Tax
records for the City of La Quinta pursuant to Section 7056 of the Revenue- and Taxation code.
Resolution 2002-70 has satisfied our request for new resolution that allows the release of both
registration and allocation information made in our April 22, 2002 letter. The resolution is effective
immediately and supersedes all prior resolutions adopted pursuant to Section 7056.
Resolution 2002-70 grants authorization to the City Manager, Finance Director, Accounting Manager,
and Account Clerk to examine Sales and Use Tax records collected by the Board for the City of La
Quinta.
Resolution 2002-70 designates Hinderliter de Llamas & Associates as a representative of the City to
examine the Sales and Use Tax records of the Board collected for the City of La Quinta. The resolution
certifies that HDL meets all of the four conditions required under section 7056.
If you have any questions, please call me at (916) 324-1386.
Thank you,
Cleveland Turner
Associate Tax Auditor
Local Revenue Allocation Section
cc: Hinderliter de Llamas & Associates
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND USE TAX
RECORDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3, an ordinance imposing a sales and
use tax to be administered by the State Board of Equalization and providing
penalties for violation, dated May 1, 1982, as amended by Ordinance No. 44,
dated December 20, 1983 ("Contract") the City of La Quinta and the State Board
of Equalization ("Board") entered into a contract to perform all functions incident to
the City's Administration and collection of local sales and use taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta deems it desirable and
necessary for authorized representatives of the City to examine confidential records
pertaining to sales and use taxes collected by the Board on behalf of the City
pursuant to the Contract; and
WHEREAS, Section 7056 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code sets
forth certain requirements and conditions for the disclosure of Board records, and
establishes criminal penalties for the unlawful disclosure of information contained
-- in, or derived from, the sales and use tax records of the Board;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following City officials are hereby designated as the City's
representatives authorized to examine records of the Board pertaining to sales and
use taxes collected on behalf of the City pursuant to the Contract:
City Manager
Finance Director
Accounting Manager
Account Clerk
SECTIQ,2. The aforementioned City employees are hereby authorized to
examine the sales and use tax records only for purposes relating to the collection of
City sales and use taxes by the Board. These efforts include:
■ Business License Administration
.— ■ Revenue Budget Administration
■ Redevelopment Agency Administration
0
Resolution No. 2002.70
Sales & Use Tax
Adopted: May 21, 2002
Papa 2
SECTION 3. Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates is hereby designated as the
City's independent representative duly authorized to examine the sales and use tax
records of the Board pertaining to sales and use taxes collected for the City by the
Board. Pursuant to the Contract Services Agreement dated July 12, 1994
("Hinderliter Contract"),Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates is:
a) Authorized to examine those sales and use tax records;
b) Required to disclose information contained in, or derived from, those sales
and use tax records only to those City officials authorized under Section 1 of
this resolution to examine the information;
c) Prohibited from performing consulting services for a retailer during the term
of that contract; and
d) Prohibited from retaining the information contained in, or derived from those
sales and use tax records, after that contract has expired.
As stated in the Hinderliter Contract, Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates may only
use information obtained during its examination of Board records for purposes of
collecting City sales and use taxes.
SECTION 4. This resolution supercedes all prior resolutions of the City
Council of the City of La Quinta adopted pursuant to subdivision (b) of California
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7056.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and send a certified copy to:
State Board of Equalization
450 N . Street
P.O. Box 942879
Sacramento, CA 94279-0027
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta
City Council, held on this 21 st day of May, 2002 by the following vote, to wit:
`� 7
RssokWon No. 2002-70
Salas & Use Tax
Adopted: May 21. 2002
Pap 3
AYES: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None /1 r\
JOHN 4.1PENA yor
City of QuintCalifornia
ATTEST:
JU . CREEK, CMC, Ci y Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1
M. KA ERINE JENSO ity Atto
City of Le Quinta, Ca ' ornia
lb
COUNCILJRDA MEETING DATE: May 21, 2002
ITEM TITLE:
Approval of a Resolution Authorizing Access
to Sales and Use Tax Records Pursuant to
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7056
RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENT 4
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing access to Sales and Use Tax
Records Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7056.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On November 7, 1995, the City of La Quinta passed Resolution No. 95-84
authorizing access to sales and use tax records pursuant to Revenue and Taxation
Code Section 7056. That Resolution named specific individuals in specific job
positions and must be rescinded, and an updated Resolution adopted, to reflect
changes in personnel and necessary information for compliance.
In a letter dated April 22, 2002, the State Board of Equalization informed the City
that their files were being updated, and a new Resolution was needed from the
City, identifying specific key points recommended by their legal staff. Information
access may be authorized by designation of position/title, rather than individuals'
names, thus providing for automatic transfer of Section 7056 authority when
personnel changes occur. It is also necessary to authorize information access to
allocation information and confidential registration information pertaining to
taxpayers in our jurisdiction, in order for the City to obtain sales tax information.
J ..0 C1U 9
The information is used to verify correct allocation to the City of La Quinta and to
analyze and forecast sales tax revenue. In addition, the City's consultant
Hinderliter, del -lamas & Associates must be authorized to obtain this information on
the City's behalf, in order to assist the City with verification and analysis of sales
tax revenues.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve a Resolution authorizing access to Sales and Use Tax Records
Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7056; or
2. Do not approve a Resolution authorizing access to Sales and Use Tax
Records Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7056; or
3. Provide Staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
ance Director
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
N h[_j yy
61
10
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION
OF SALES AND USE TAX RECORDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3, an ordinance imposing a sales and
use tax to be administered by the State Board of Equalization and providing
penalties for violation, dated May 1, 1982, as amended by Ordinance No. 44,
dated December 20, 1983 ("Contract") the City of La Quinta and the State Board
of Equalization ("Board") entered into a contract to perform all functions incident to
the City's Administration and collection of local sales and use taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta deems it desirable and
necessary for authorized representatives of the City to examine confidential records
pertaining to sales and use taxes collected by the Board on behalf of the City
pursuant to the Contract; and
WHEREAS, Section 7056 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code sets
forth certain requirements and conditions for the disclosure of Board records, and
establishes criminal penalties for the unlawful disclosure of information contained
in, or derived from, the sales and use tax records of the Board;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following City officials are hereby designated as the City's
representatives authorized to examine records of the Board pertaining to sales and
use taxes collected on behalf of the City pursuant to the Contract:
City Manager
Finance Director
Accounting Manager
Account Clerk
Section 2. The aforementioned City employees are hereby authorized to examine
the sales and use tax records only for purposes relating to the collection of City
sales and use taxes by the Board. These efforts include:
■ Business License Administration
■ Revenue Budget Administration
■ Redevelopment Agency Administration
3 r) n
j, 1:0
Section 3. Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates is hereby designated as the City's
independent representative duly authorized to examine the sales and use tax
records of the Board pertaining to sales and use taxes collected for the City by the
Board. Pursuant to the Contract Services Agreement dated July 12, 1994
("Hinderliter Contract"), Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates is:
a) Authorized to examine those sales and use tax records;
b) Required to disclose information contained in, or derived from, those sales
and use tax records only to those City officials authorized under Section 1 of
this resolution to examine the information;
c) Prohibited from performing consulting services for a retailer during the term
of that contract; and
d1 Prohibited from retaining the information contained in, or derived from those
sales and use tax records, after that contract has expired.
As stated in the Hinderliter Contract, Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates may only
use information obtained during its examination of Board records for purposes of
collecting -City sales and use taxes.
Section 4. This resolution supercedes all prior resolutions of the City Council of the
City of La Quinta adopted pursuant to subdivision (b) of California Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 7056.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and send a
certified copy to:
State Board of Equalization
450 N. Street
P.O. Box 942879
Sacramento, CA 94279-0027
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta
City Council, held on this 21 st day of May, 2002 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
r
j1 %, , �J
U4
12
JOHN J. PENA, Mayor
City of La auinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE GREEK, City Clerk
City of La auinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KATHY JENSON, City Attorney
City of La auinta, California
U6'l
J ►? el
065
13
WAIS Document Retrieval ge 4 of 7
ATTACHMENT 5
p7!property the storage, use, or other consumption of which is
subject to ax. The reports shall be fi e board
requires and shal o s and addresses of purchasers of
the tangibl a prope sales price of the property, the
dat sale, and such other informatio oard may require.
7056. (a) (1) Excepting the information set forth on permits issued
under Article 2 (commencing with Section 6066) of Chapter 2, the
information set forth on certificates of registration issued pursuant
to Section 6226, and the terms of any settlement made pursuant to
Section 19442 (as amended by Chapter 138 of the Statutes of 1994), it
is unlawful for the board, any person having an administrative duty
under this part or any person who obtains access to information
contained in, or derived from, sales or transactions and use tax
records of the board pursuant to subdivision (b), to make known in
any manner whatever the business affairs, operations, or any other
information pertaining to any retailer or any other person required
to report to the board or pay a tax pursuant to this part, or the
amount or source of income, profits, losses, expenditures, or any
particular thereof, set forth or disclosed in any return, or to
permit any return or copy thereof or any book containing any abstract
or particulars thereof to be seen or examined by any person.
(2) It is also unlawful for any person, other than an officer or
employee of a county, city and county, city, or district, who obtains
access to information contained in, or derived from, sales or
transactions and use tax records of the board pursuant to subdivision
(b), to retain that information after that person's contract with
the county, city and county, city, or district has expired.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), the Governor may, by
general or special order, authorize examination by other state
officers, by tax officers of another state, by the federal
government, if a reciprocal arrangement exists, by the tax officials
of Mexico, if a reciprocal agreement exists, or by any other person
of the records maintained by the board under this part. The
information so obtained pursuant to the order of the Governor shall
not be made public except to the extent and in the manner that the
order may authorize that it be made public.
(b) When requested by resolution of the legislative body of any
county, city and county, city, or district, the board shall permit
any duly authorized officer or employee of the county, city and
county, city, or district, or other person designated by that
resolution, to examine all of the sales or transactions and use tax
records of the board pertaining to the ascertainment of those sales
or transactions and use taxes to be collected for the county, city
and county, city, or district by the board pursuant to contract
entered into between the board and the county, city and county, city,
or district under the Bradley -Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax
Law (Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 7200)) or the Transactions and
Use Tax Law (Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251)). Except as
otherwise provided herein, this subdivision shall not be construed to
allow any officer, employee, or other person authorized or
designated by a county, city and county, city, or district to examine
any sales or transactions and use tax records of any taxpayer. The
costs that are incurred by the board in complying with a request made
pursuant to this subdivision shall be deducted by the board from
those revenues collected by the board on behalf of the county, city
and county, city, or district making the request.
(1) The resolution shall certify that any person designated by the ` ti
14
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=4684408093+0+0+0&WAISacti... 12/3/2003
WAIS Document. Retrieval
Page 5 of 7
resolution, other than an officer or employee, meets all of the
following conditions:
(A) Has an existing contract with the county, city and county,
city, or district to examine those sales and use tax records.
(B) Is required by that contract to disclose information contained
in, or derived from, those sales or transactions and use tax records
only to an officer or employee of the county, city and county, city,
or district who is authorized by the resolution to examine the
information.
(C) Is prohibited by that contract from performing consulting
services for a retailer during the term of that contract.
(D) Is prohibited by that contract from retaining the information
contained in, or derived from, those sales or transactions and use
tax records, after that contract has expired. .
(2) Information obtained by examination of board records as
permitted in this subdivision shall be used only for purposes related
to the collection of local sales or transactions and use taxes by
the board pursuant to the contract, or for purposes related to other
governmental functions of the county, city and county, city, or
district set forth in the resolution.
(c) If the board believes that any information obtained pursuant
to subdivision (b) has been disclosed to any person not authorized or
designated by the resolution of the legislative body of the county,
city and county, city, or district, or has been used for purposes not
permitted by subdivision (b), then notwithstanding subdivision (b),
the board may impose conditions on access to its sales and use tax
records which the board considers reasonable, in order to protect the
confidentiality of those records.
(d) Predecessors, successors, receivers, trustees, executors,
administrators, assignees, and guarantors, if directly interested,
may be given information as to the items included in the measure and
amounts of any unpaid tax or amounts of tax required to be collected,
interest, and penalties.
(e) For purposes of this section, "reciprocal agreement" means a
formal agreement to exchange information between national taxing
officials of Mexico and taxing authorities of the State Board of
Equalization, the Franchise Tax Board, and the Employment Development
Department. Furthermore, the reciprocal agreement shall be limited
to the exchange of information which is essential for tax
administration purposes only. Taxing authorities of the State of
California shall be granted tax information only on California
residents. Taxing authorities of Mexico shall be granted tax
information only on Mexican nationals.
7056.5. (a) Except as otherwise provided by this article or other
express provision of law, the information furnished or secured
pursuant to this part shall be used solely for the purpose of
administering the tax laws or other laws administered by the person
or agency obtaining it. Any willful unauthorized inspection or
unwarranted disclosure or use of the information by the person or
agency, or the employees and officers thereof, is a misdemeanor. For
purposes of this section, "inspection" means any examination of
confidential information furnished or secured pursuant to this part.
(b) The board shall notify a taxpayer of any known incidents of
willful unauthorized inspection or unwarranted disclosure or use of
the taxpayer's confidential tax records, but only if criminal charges
have been filed for the willful unauthorized inspection or
U
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=4684408093+0+0+0&WAISacti... 12/3/2003
15
WAIS Document Retrieval
Page 6 of 7
unwarranted disclosure.
7056.6. (a) Except as otherwise provided by law, any person who is
engaged in the business of preparing, or providing services in
connection with the preparation of, returns under Chapter 5
(commencing with Section 6451), or any person who for compensation
prepares any such return for any other person, and who knowingly or
recklessly does either of the following, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more
than one thousand dollars ($1,000) or imprisoned no more than one
year, or both, together with the costs of prosecution:
(1) Discloses any information furnished to him or her for, or in
connection with, the preparation of the return.
(2) Uses that information for any purpose other than to prepare,
or assist in preparing, the return.
(b) Subdivision (a) shall not apply to disclosure of information
if that disclosure is made pursuant to the person's consent or
pursuant to a subpoena, court order,.or other compulsory legal
process.
7of EqudITZaTI
a thorized to accept an application for a seller's permit under
Se ion 6066 of this code or authorized to register a retailer under
Sect n 6226 of this code shall at the time of acceptance of such an
applic tion or such registration, ascertain whether or not the person
is also equired to register as an employer under Section 1086 of
the Unemp oyment Insurance Code, and if so shall register the person
as an empl er on a form provided by the Employment Development
Department a d shall promptly notify the Employment Development
Department of uch registration.
7058. A certificat by the board or an employee of the board
stating that a notice required by this part was given by mailing or
personal service .shall\e-afacie evidence in any administrative
or judicial proceedingct and regularity of the mailing or
personal service in acith any requirement of this part for
the giving of a noticeotherwise specifically required, any
notice provided by thibe mailed or served may be given
either by mailing or bservice in the manner provided for
giving notice of a deft mination.
7060. (a) The board, under regulations rescribed by the board, may
establish a reward program for informatio resulting in the
identification of underreported or unreport taxes due under this
part. Any reward may not exceed 10 percent o the taxes collected as
a result of the information provided. Any pers n employed by or
under contract with any state or federal tax col ction agency shall
not be eligible for a reward provided pursuant to t s section.
(b) Within 21/2 years of the effective date of the ct adding this
subdivision or within 21/2 years of the commencement o program
pursuant to subdivision (a), whichever is later, the boar shall
report to the Legislature on all of the following:
(1) The number of informant letters and telephone calls re ived
duri= the 2-year period following the effective date of the act
J
16
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=4684408093+0+0+0&WAISacti... 12/3/2003
l��—z--
DEPARTMENT REPORT:
a40� �0 •
OF
U rY
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: December 16, 2003
RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for November 2003
Attached please find the following:
1. Citizen Service Request Summary;
2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary;
3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update;
4. Monthly Summary of Public Works Tasks;
5. Engineering Policy Statement for Deceleration Lanes;
6. Bond status for Avenue 58 Improvements.
lub
mothy R. J sso
lic Works Efirector/City Engineer
#'�'-).
J 4,
V J
a
N W
W m
C1 w
wO
W Z
3
<3
N
N
N
O
N
O
O
CM
It
O
N
O
¢
k
r
�
.., .,.
N
t5 p:A j uP� �r,
5 tiK
S�p
M,.
Y �s
Y,
N
N
r'
x.
t
P,
N
m
a
N
..R
.,
Ct
•-
N
b
N
M
F:
Po.
M
O
O
.-
O
T-
.-
O
N
O
e-
N
N
(D
N
O
O
M
14,
O
N
O
'
S'
gar
b
N
N
N
CO
N
•-
O
O
M
�
O
N
O
c
.a
i
:+
0
c
0
O
'� c
Z 'w0+
NJ
t�
c 0
c
0 0
3
0
3
CD
c
v
ea m
a'c�
�i
m
H
°� m
yca0
a
"
Co
•�
c�ncm
o
.-
o
a c
N
_
co
r
O
d
W
}
J
2
F-
Z
i
F-
Qa
�w
U) _
=0
F-
Z
O Z
2W
aO000Oo
wggqq00
I-000000
0069NN0v
UJ
00
e-
O
M
e-
".
LLB
N
63,
O
0
6
1
V
W
LL
0
F-
F-000000
Z
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
O
O
O
C
O
o
0
0
00
N
�C)MV-
N
0
v
�
W
64
N
6g
�
M
400-
W
L.
W
N
CM
Z
O
F-
F-
W
W
o00�
0
O
O
W
Q
o
Z
C�
C/)
Lli
~�WF-�W
J
LU
5
W
U
amU)101
C.��
M
O
O
N
w
m
2
w
O
Z
w
�U
w
m cf)
D Y
}w
� U
Z
og
2 a.
o
1
1
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Z
(MD
D
�
to
N
CO
0
cri
r.
c-i
ch
NN
Ld
cli
C
.-
cV
w
N
N
w
w
w
Y
V
w
V
a
w
CO
CO
wQww
wZCL
w
�?
z
_O
w
ozOaZZZO}Z�W_Ow
U
Z0:t-0OQ�w=N
Za00
i
O_a0_a¢am
ZIL
VZ�
C',�OW
z104
oaa��
w
Wgaa_3ZZ:
-,az
w?=zUw=�cnaF-
0cnpgWW
�wcnZOcnzcnZ0z00x00
-
UP:
00
Ocn
IL
w_
0
0
5
w
0
wz=
0
w
awF.
a
a
F-
zN
U)Z
a
U
U
U
U
U
Q
Q
ZVzza.
z
--
J
ZZ
WUofW
��ZZ0-
tQ
7-a��
.�
w
a
n-
ga
cD
CD
ga
n.
0
tD
Ci
U
?
0
�
J
�Zzz
OacnOu-aa00
J
aFF-
x�
��,zLL
w
0
w1-
maaaaaMaM���aa
N
N
a
c
H4w
01
►1
r
.0O
•c
cv
Q
►;
o� -0 cn
L: -p O
O
O C
O
N U
}'
d oCD ai
c +;
cO
c� cv
-v
0
O
+�
ai
c
a a
ca
j �,
LL cn
v
v (D
C
c
cv E
CO
00
O
V
C
QUO
+-'
E
>
�'--5
a .c
am•+
U
�"'
E
c'��
U
C
cn
O
-C
J Ln C
L�c'�
o'°°'�3c
Ma m
m
E'a
U
a'ya
a
`�ON'cn
��dN'
V
}'�co _a
C O
N >
C
O
�=p
L
'*'
a)
M O
vi
E~
O
C
}+
c(D
C (�
CDC
<*Moo,�a�
O
Q
C.)S+
U
'�._�
° � a�CO
•�
o
�
o
�
U
cu•- CL a)
�
UO>.0
cn�
+-+
y
O
�
u
.-
°
�(nn��
>�
0
vC
v
EO c�
�
cn . c
y
"p %.
O
�
Z
N
cn V
-fl
C
O
C W V m
'o p)
Q >.
m�
C F-
Q
O
+O-�
O
-p
cn
O
+�
+•'
O C
= O
J O
O
•�
G
cn
i (n
M
p E
O
��, '+r
m
�'
N
00
O
N
O V
�-+
M
U
U
s
-fl
Q N >�
m
O
_�
N
cow
cn
>
cc
O
c*jc
OO
>-0
CR�CDC>
�C
O
,CL
c0
O
0
Co O�
C..
s m
.m
C
C
LM
v L
O
C U
O
O G)
C .E
C c
,c
C7
cu
U
.�-+
'�
4
•a)
cn O+ i—
N a)>
.0 U
cn
0 7
'v� O
'cn
+
C
E
Q
>
O Q
m
LV
I= C
O
O
U Q (D
.(D >=
O 07 .n
a
�
Q�
O O
O -a
O O
O U
+�
(n
U Q
Q
z
O
-a
M
M
o
O
� c
E
v
c
M
o
Ln
Ln
L
H
�
N
z
O
N
in
V
o
'v
p
p
N
O
O
C
O
Z
c
O
N
N
N
?�
y
W
t
00
CD
O
M
InM
�O
LO
M
Ln
O
cn
00
LV
M
O
N
O
D
M
N
m
N
:3
(n
CD
c
O
C:)or-
O
aca
.
L-0•
0�
—
Uc
0
NN�
a.
O
(D
(n C
m
O
X.
W
O
V
a)0�,,
OJO
O.Z
Ez
CL
W
M
U
p
O
cn C_
•O
0
'>
CLcl-
G) O
•O
c
O
Ia.
U
--
-��a`.
��
��
U
5
M
W.
O
r,
+r
w>
w
E
cp
w`w
o)V0
0
a
>VUcO
°
4-1
c�
4-
CM
JM
C)
.0
C
O
.•—
C
O
O
C
O
E
C
cm
;E
tm
O
+U)O
O�
U
O
Cy
O
c
a)
>�Cu
r,
(&
'0
C� U
OC
cu
2'
O
pL
.
>Nc:
G
N
a
«.�
a..
-
cn
X
° a
U
O
"c
L
(D
co
t
>°U
mCO
(n
m
C
cn
7O�cQIm
cn
�
Cc
J>.•
C
O Y
C
O
C
cn
O
%
U—)+j 00
�
O
a)O
N O
.�
c
ca
3.LmE
O
�..1
-0�n�
CL
Uv
r
.- I
0.
JU
w
c
N
> C-4
CO
LL
J L-
O
O N
Q
C
U
w
C
o
O
c
Q
Q
m
��+
C
°
fl.
_
N
O
m
m
O O
a a
`� CU °
0)
E
co
c
cn
3
._
3
M
c c�a
c
L
3
c
c 0
Q
•Q�
C7 v
C
,�
fl.
�
.�
.0
.0
•�
O
CO Q
.�
N
Wcu
cc
UJQO
p
C.)
(D C
cn
C:3
C
O
Im
7 O
LL
10U
0 0
O
(D
0
O 00
0v}
O
�
c
c
c
M
c
_
v
,a
o
�E
_
E
_
E
O
r-
E
d.
O
CD
�
CD
�
H.
D
-Op
-a
a
-p
M
O
"p
�
O
y
Z
ca
v
CY)
O
v
O
+r
o
F-
O
+r
O
O
+r
O
� �
CD
M
o
M
M
Z
C7
4)
(D
O
O
O
p 0
W
CL
E
�-
C E _O
'O L- O
�U
0
0
Q
C
co
N
O
V
N
O
m o>
4-- a�
CD 0
a
LU
n
00
N
O
to
00
(0
00
0
OTC
00
00
O
M
00
W
L
o
a
O
LO
(D
D
�
U
00
N
Ln
cn
E C°
C�
O
O
O
�CD
00
N
O
Q O
0N
a o
�- aCi
w
U
O
o_,
°�
-0 0
Ci
�Ez
�pO
>
J
-0
(D
>
—
0
co
Q
(n
N 0
' —�
L �- Q
C)
C
L°L_
�
Q.
0
'
�
�i-
fl-
U V
0
a
U
co
a.u)n
=U
Ly—L
�a.
�.
can
m CD O
�=�CL
OH
CD
rn
a
cn
D
C
O
C
O
0)
C
-0 C '0 co
C D O C
C —
O
�
co
O
X
D
U) U
()
)
.N
co LO a "
-0 *- 0
'�
C
l�L
•�
0 .N "0 "0
�-
a
V
'5 O
m
LPL
a
a 0>
cv
+�
co
>
p
cn
0
a.
m0��CY)
�+--
coC �O��a
m
nC
�cc'•°
O
M
C C
0 0 0
p
co
_
S
_
0
0
'C
c
L
C N
+
-0 cn 0) 'cv
�a �- 0
0
a
U
•� .a
O
cn
•C
Q
+
Q
•N
O •� -n
O O U
co
U
C
0
m
cv
p
v C O
p 0
0 U
r-
C
0>
V O
c.�
C
C�
o
CUB
U
0 O
C O
O
x
d
OM
O
m
0
cv�
_
c�
.o
O
N U
.�
"0
to
N L
to
O
N
'D
E
O
.2
C
0)
+0--+
C
.0
C
•� •M
Q
co
p
Oul
p
C�
'D
M
'C cn
O
0
'0
0
C
U)
O m p
L
O
U
15
0
+�+
0
+�•+
p
cv �
>
Q
C) L
•� C
0
C
co
i
co O
0
0
'�
+•+
.7m
cc
0
o
C
.N
C
�-
D
� C
0
{>,
E
p
O
C
D
O
o
C
0 E
O
,+_.'
O
a C
p
+',
7
0
cn
Vi
O
C
E
O
C CM O
�(n V
c�
c
c
0�C Q•'�
C
O
E
E
co 0
O
'�
D
O d'a.Cy)
•J '�
0
•ai
O
•co
+_
0
0o
'U)
c-0
'C
D
,co
E
p .a
Q
a
o
cn
p aU'i
� �
cn C o�
O
C M 'E
�
c
cn C
E a,cu
C C .0
0� '� •co
C
(.N
0
N
c
0
0 C>
D
E
'0
aC
x
0 O
>�
0
L- C
W
�
C
C
co
a)
e— cn
C
Q cv
C r' 0
0 cn
C
Q
O
Q '0
W
. � L)
—
0)
C
a co
O
C
C
-0
-0
v
E
C_
E
C
E
C_
E
E
L
UO
O
O
O
O
.a
Z
C
0
.0
0
c
0
cn
•a
E
-0 E
-0
E
-0
�,
0
0
N
ca
V
0
0
0
0
0
W0
W
co
(0
00
a
�
T-
O
O
O
r-
N
cY)
LO
Uci
Lr)
m
o.
(,
O
M
M
M
Ct
O
O
N
>
U>
O
>
M
O
�
O
m
N
E
0
}, n.
x
>
c
c
°-
c
w�a
0+'
oc�-0ao,
E0
oc�
}'
J
O
E
M 0
C C
m
0
>
U
a)C
>
O
—
W
ui
Q
M
>
!E0 -0 O
0
O
cn
`
O
;}+
0
a
u.
U-
cn
�'
cn
cn
Q
m
MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PUBLIC WORK TASKS MONTH OF: November, 2003
Em loyee's Hourly Labor Breakdown
Crew#1
Crew #2
Crew #3
Maint. Mg.
Code
Activity
5 Men
4 Men
0 Man
1 Man
Total
1000
Policing/inspection
31
11
0
23
65
1001
Pot Hole-Repair/Patching
45
17
0
0
62
1002
Crack/Joint-Repair
0
0
0
0
0
1003
Pavement Marking/Legends
3
0
0
0
3
1004
Pavement Marking/St ping
0
0
0
0
0
1005 lCurb
Painting
0
0
0
0
0
1006
Other Traffic Controls
28
7
0
0
35
1007
Curb & Gutter Repair/Const.
0
0
0
0
0
1008
Other Concrete Repairs/Const.
2
0
0
0
2
1009
Street Sign Install (New)
6
0
0
0
6
1010
Street Sign Repair/Maint
40
6
0
1
47
1011
Debris Removal
24
44
0
2
70
1012
Right of Way Maint.
22
102
0
0
124
1021
CLEAN Catch Basin Inlet/Outlet
0
0
0
0
0
1022
Rondo Channel Outlet/Vault
0
0
0
0
0
1022A
Desert Club Outlet/Vault
4
0
0
0
4
1023
Retention Basins Repair/Maint.
0
9
0
0
9
1024
Gutter/Median Sand Removal
0
0
0
1
1
1025
Street Sweeping (Machine)
83
0
0
0
83
1026
Street Sweeping (Hand)
0
5.5
0
0
5.5
1027
Sidewalk/Bike Path Cleaning
7
0
0
0
7
1028
Dust Control
0
0
0
0
1029
Flood Control
23
25
0
5
53
1031
Parks/Retention Basins Inspection/Clean-
6
2
0
2
10
1041
Mowing/ Weeding, Shrubs & Tree Trimmi
27
12.5
0
6
45.5
1051
Landscape/Irrigation Contract Manageme
0
35
0
16
51
1052
Lighting/Electrical Contract Management
0
25
0
15
40
1061
Small Tools Repair/Maint.
0
2
0
0
2
1062
Equipment Repair/Maint.
10
2
0
0
12
1063
Vehicle Repair Maint.
17
7
0
0
24
1081
Trash/Litter/Recycable Removal
10
25
0
0
35
1082
Vandalism Repairs
0
5
0
0
5
1083
Graffiti Removal
24
22
0
0
46
1084
Maint. Yard Building Maint.
16
0
0
1
17
1085
Seminars/Training
0
0
0
0
0
1086
Special Events
0
0
0
1
1
1087
Citizen Complaints/Requests
49
33
0
1
83
1088
Meeting
9
16.5
0
24
49.5
1089
Office (Phone, paperwork, reports, Misc.)
8
37.5
0
36
81.5
SUBTOTAL
494
451
0
134
1079
1091
Over Time
57
5
0
0
62
1094
Jury Duty ()
0
1095
Sick Leave
34
20
0
2
56
1096
Vacation
80
73
0
153
1097
Holiday
112
96
0
24
232
1098
STD (Short Tenn Disability)
0
0
0
0
0
1099
Bereavement (George)
0
0
0
0
0
SUBTOTAL
283
194
0
26
503
TOTAL HOURS
777
645
0
160
1582
TOTAL MILES
2439
3703
01
4301
6572
P.O. Box 1504
78-495 CALLE TAMPICO (760) 777-7000
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX (760) 777-7101
ENGINEERING BULLETIN # 03-08
TO: All Interested Parties
FROM: bWimothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Directory/City Engineer
DATE: December 16, 2003
SUBJECT: Auxiliary Lanes and Traffic Impact Studies Required for Proposed
Development Projects
This Engineering Bulletin establishes the City's policy on when auxiliary lanes and
traffic impact studies will be required for proposed development projects.
AUXILIARY LANES
Auxiliary lanes shall be installed on all Primary Arterial streets, and higher order
street classification according to the following criteria:
a) A left -turn deceleration lane with taper and storage length is required for any
driveway with a projected peak hour left ingress turning volume greater than
25 vehicles per hour (vph). The taper length will be included within the
required deceleration lane length.
b) A right -turn deceleration lane with taper and storage length is required for
any driveway with a projected peak hour right ingress turning volume greater
than 50 vehicles per hour (vph). The taper length will be included within the
required deceleration lane length.
c) Right -turn deceleration will not generally be required on streets with more
than three travel lanes in the direction of the right -turn lane.
Auxiliary lanes will also be required to meet the following criteria:
1. The minimum lane length shall be 100 feet plus taper length.
2. The right-of-way must be widened 12 feet to accommodate the 12-foot wide
auxiliary lane.
3. No reductions in the width of the landscape buffer will be permitted to
construct the auxiliary lane.
4. All auxiliary lanes must be contained within the development project limits.
9 ��
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES
All proposed development projects will be required to prepare a traffic impact study
if they meet the following criteria:
1. The project is anticipated to generate 50, or more, peak hour trips;
2. The City Engineer reserves the right to require a traffic impact study when in
his/her judgment the project will create potentially significant impacts to the
level of service to any adjacent streets or intersections
The balance of this page is intentionally left blank.
10 .
CV
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: 01mothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer
DATE: December 16, 2003
RE: Avenue 58: Madison Street to Lake Cahuilla Access Road
Engineering staff has investigated the estimated cost to improve the subject segment
of Avenue 58 in accordance with the approved alignment for Avenue 58 and Jefferson
Street adopted by City Council Resolutions 95-40 and 95-41. Staff has also
researched City files to determine the extent of existing security posted by developers
to aid in the cost of improving subject segment of Avenue 58. The November 18,
2003 Department Report identified the Development Impact Fee (DIF) program as
reserving $1,098,240 for core improvements to this section of road, as well as
$447,000 in the Pavement Management Program (PMP) for resurfacing this roadway
in 2006/2007 (see Attachment 1). This roadway is also listed in the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) additional project list.
The findings are as follows:
Cost Estimate
Please refer to the attached map of the alternatives.
Alternative #1 — $2,870,000
Construct full width improvements (between curbs only) between Madison
Street and the Lake Cahuilla Access Road. It should be noted that the estimate
includes approximately $1,000,000 to import 200,000 cubic yards of soil in
order to construct a ramp over the flood control dike. If soil in the immediate
vicinity could be acquired, the soil import cost would be significantly reduced.
This alternative would widen the entire length of Avenue 58 from Madison
Street to the Lake Cahuilla access road, regardless of whether or not the City
held bonds from the adjacent property owner. A similar approach was used for
widening Avenue 48 as a single project.
T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2003\12-16-03\Dept Report - Avenue 58.doc
v
Alternative #2 - $2,460,000
This alternative provides two different improvement widths depending on
location: 1) an interim width improvement (i.e. 40-foot wide AC pavement
section for the core of the street only) between Madison Street and the east
boundary of PGA West, where adjacent development projects would be
conditioned to install the additional pavement width as those properties are
developed; and 2) a full width improvement from the east boundary of PGA
West to the Lake Cahuilla Access Road utilizing $629,354 from Tract No.
28960 (i.e. PGA West) to participate in the cost of the improvements, with the
balance publicly funded. This alternative also contains the $1,000,000 line item
for soil import, which hopefully can be reduced.
Conclusion
Regardless of which alternative is chosen, there is a slight funding shortfall due to the
expense of crossing the dike. Staff anticipates working with either developers or the
Coachella Valley Parks and Recreation District to secure less expensive fill soil to
overcome this shortfall. In the meantime public funding of the improvements to
Avenue 58 will have to be viewed in light of other transportation improvements and
street maintenance funded by the DIF and PMP.
T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2003\12-16-03\Dept Report - Avenue 58.doc 12 J v J � I'�
ATTACHMENT 1
Bond Summary & Existing Requirement to Construct
Alternative #1
Existina Bonds
PGA West (Tract No. 28960).......................... $629,354
Lions Gate (Tract No. 28034).............................38,000
Stone Creek Ranch (Tract No. 30834) ...............132,818
Quarry Ranch (Tract No. 30651).....................(See Footnote 1 ►
Subtotal....................................................... $800,172
Future Bonds
Tentative Tract No. 31249 ........................... 1,320 LF
Coral Mountain (Specific Plan 03-067) ........... 2,640 LF
Subtotal......................................3960 LF = $330,000
Future Public Funding (See Footnote 2)
DIF (no date identified) ................................ $1,098,240
CIP 2006/2007.......................................... $447,000
Subtotal................................................. = $1,545,240
TOTAL...................................................... $2,675,412
Alternative #2
Existing Bonds
PGA West (Tract No. 28960) (see Footnote 3) .. $629,354
Subtotal.................................................... = $629,354
Future Public Funding (See Footnote 2)
DIF (no date identified) ................................ $1,098,240
CIP 2006/2007.......................................... $447,000
Subtotal ................................................. = $1,545,240
TOTAL...................................................... $ 2,174, 594
1 Quarry Rancho has posted security for Jefferson Street along its easterly boundary, but that
segment is south of Lake Cahuilla Road (i.e. beyond the subject study area) and can not be
applied to this project.
2 Future Public Funding is subject to competition with other transportation improvements and
maintenance priorities.
3 The PGA West security is the only security that can be applied to offset the estimated cost
of this alternative because these improvement costs were included in the estimate.
T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2003\12-16-03\Dept Report - Avenue 58.doc 13
Z -Gown-lom
•b
1
DEPARTMENT REPORT: 7
CITY OF LA Q UINTA
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHL Y REPORT
November 2003
City of La Quinta
La Quinta Police Department
Captain John Horton, Commanding
November 2003 Highlights
(Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day)
Saturday, 11-01-03 (86):
At approx. 0024 hours, Deputies responded to Dune Palms MHP reference several subjects fighting in the
street. Deputies arrived in the area but were UTL any disturbance. Desert Dispatch later received a phone
call from Eisenhower Hospital regarding an assault victim out of La Quinta. Cpl Perez responded and
contacted Joseph Puchi. Puchi admitted to being in a physical altercation at the MHP and struck over the
head with a bottle but refused to provide Cpl. Perez with any useful information. Puchi sustained a
laceration to his head and shoulder during the altercation. Cpl. Perez is writing an assault with a deadly
weapon report to document the incident.
At approx. 0035 hours, Deputies responded to the 52000 block of Avenida Navarro reference a loud party.
Deputies arrived at the location and found approx. 60 subjects in the street. During contact with the
homeowner, Deputies learned that there had been two fights at the location prior to their arrival. A small
amount of blood was found in the driveway but the victim(s) were nowhere to be found. Deputies checked
with local hospitals but were UTL any victim(s). The party was dispersed.
Sundav,ll-02_-03 (46):
At approx. 1940 hours we received a call of some lost hikers in the La Quinta area. With the assistance of
C.H.P's, H-60 air unit, we were able to pinpoint their location. The search and rescue team was called out.
At 0200 hours they were still working on getting them out of the hills, and Sgt. Gnatek relieved me.
Additional information to follow by Sgt. Gnatek.
On 11/03/03, at about 0700 hrs. H-60, CHP's helicopter, arrived and airlifted the hikers to safety. The
names of the hikers are Ernesto Gonzalez of La Quinta, Clerc Alain of Rancho Mirage, Philippe Serrus of
La Quinta, and Didier Tsirony of La Quinta. All four hikers suffered from fatigue and cold. Gonzalez also
sustained a bruised left knee. During the search, Barbara Miller, a volunteer search and rescue person had
fell and sustained injuries to her right leg and face. She was treated at Eisenhower Immediate care and
released. Deputy Gnatek completed the industrial injury paperwork.
2345 Hrs-Deputy Hendry responded to the area Monroe and Ave. 56 reference a sexual assault. Upon
arrival, he spoke with a female victim from Palm Springs. According to the victim, she and a Hispanic
male (known only as Oscar) drove to the area of the 55000 block of Monroe to use some illegal drugs.
(During the investigation, she admitted to being a prostitute) While there, they got naked and she orally
copulated Oscar. Oscar then wanted to have sexual intercourse with her. When she refused, he got angry,
attempted to keep her clothes and refused to let her out of the vehicle. The victim said she managed to get
out of the vehicle with her clothing and screamed for help. The suspect vehicle is a gold color Mercury
Cougar with unknown license plate number. The vehicle was last seen traveling south on Monroe from
their location. A rape kit completed on O'Kelly and Rape Crisis counselor arrived and spoke with her.
Monday, 11-03-03 (59):
At approx. 2110 hours, Deputy Monis arrested William Wilkins for public intoxication during a suspicious
vehicle call at Eisenhower and Tampico, in La Quinta.
Tuesday, 11-04-03 (83):
No significant activity to report.
Wednesday,11-05-03 (59):
1205 hours, Deputy Orr was driving through the parking lot of the Vons at Hwy I I I X Washington when
he heard an explosion coming from the front of the store. He described it as being louder than a firecracker
and possibly being an M-80. He confronted the picketers who denied involvement. A picketer, later
identified as Charlie Box, admitted responsibility and said he lit off a firecracker. There was no evidence in
the parking lot of paper shreds. Box had an outstanding traffic warrant and was subsequently arrested.
Box was then transported to the station where he was cited and released after being photographed. Dep.
Orr documented the incident as a violation of 12671 H&S but there wasn't enough evidence to make an
arrest or prosecute the case.
Deputy Adams arrested David Anthony Herrera and Leah Hernandez for vehicle theft & receiving stolen
property after they made an illegal turn at Miles Ave. and Dune Palms. The vehicle was stolen in Indio on
11/03/03. Both were booked at the Jail.
Thursday, 11-06-03 (73):
No significant activity to report
Fridaw 11-07-03 (79):
At approx. 0015 hours, Deputy J. Garcia conducted a traffic stop at Hwy I I I X Adams and contacted
Manuel Felix. During a consensual search, Deputy Garcia located 7.5 grams of marijuana and a glass pipe.
Felix was cite & released.
Saturday,11-08-03 (32):
No significant activity
Sunday,11-09-03 (55):
No significant activity
Monday,11-10-03 (73):
1350 hours, Dep. Donivan conducted a pedestrian check on wanted residential burglary suspect Randy
Marroquin, in front of the Dune Palms Mobile Home Park, at the 46000 block of Dune Palms Rd.
Marroquin told him that he had a gun then ran away. We placed a perimeter around the park, obtained air
support and C-K9. (S) Marroquin was located hiding underneath a trailer. He surrendered just before the
dog was sent under the mobile home and was taken into custody without further incident. The neighboring
schools were put on lock down for about twenty minutes for the safety of the children.
Deputy Quintero handled an APS case involving neglect by the daughter of an 88-yr. old woman from LQ.
The woman is at JFK under APS custody and a case is in progress on evaluating her at JFK. Guardianship
is pending. Two greedy daughters want her several million dollars in dispute over her estate when she dies.
Both sisters dislike each other, but want control over the mom. One sister, Lee Tianae Richardson will be
filed on due to bedsores and general neglect as a caregiver. The woman is not fed or given water and was
admitted as being dehydrated. The second sister came into the office argue with me and insisted on
speaking to the Captain when I told her the case was being forwarded to the District Attorney for review.
She said she would go to the press and wanted to speak to Grover Trask personally. The second woman
Linda Grant said she "diagnosed" her mother's condition as congestive heart failure and said the doctor at
JFK is wrong. She may make an appointment to see the Captain. I forwarded the information to OAS
Aguirre.
J�
Tuesday, 11-11-03 (79):
At 2130 hrs- Sr. Deputy Swan conducted a traffic stop at Adams south of Hwy. 111 on Edwin Vela, of La
Quinta for unsafe speed. During the stop, Vela used a false name and date of birth. Sr. Deputy Swan was
able to determine Vela's true name and DOB and learned that Vela had a suspended license and a felony
poss. of a designated controlled substance warrant.
Wednesday,11-12-03 (62):
At approx. 1200 hours, Deputy Adams arrested Robert Joseph Pasquariello for driving under the influence
of alcohol in La Quinta.
At 2140 hours, Deputy Reynoso responded to Home Depot on Hwy. 111 in reference a shoplifter in
custody. Upon his arrival, he spoke with Miguel Ferrer, who admitted to entering Home Depot to steal
property and sell it. Ferrer was arrested for burglary and booked into Indio jail.
At approx. 0030 hours, Deputy Ervin responded to the 53000 block of Avenida Rubio reference an attempt
suicide. Upon arrival, Deputy Ervin contacted David Burk. Burk had cut his left wrist with a serrated knife.
Burk was subsequently transported to JFK hospital for medical clearance then to Indio Mental Health for a
72-hour evaluation.
Thursdav, 11-13-03 87
At approx. 0130 hours, Deputy JC Garcia responded to the area of Tampico and Bermudas reference two
males fighting. Deputy Garcia responded to the area and conducted a bike stop on Daniel Oshaunassy (22
years). Oshaunassy refused to cooperate with Deputy Garcia. Oshaunassy was subsequently arrested for
resisting arrest after he refused to sign a citation for operating a bike at night w/o lighting equipment.
1522 hours- Deputies from the Indio Station responded to an armed robbery at the PFF bank, located at the
78000 block of Hwy I I I in the City of La Quinta. Bank employee's reported two black male adults had
robbed them at gunpoint. The suspects fled the area in a green Ford Expedition with paper plates. With in
minutes, Deputy Michaels spotted the vehicle headed N/B on Washington St. towards the I-10 freeway.
Deputy Michaels radioed for additional unit and initiated pursuit of the vehicle. The pursuit traversed north
on Washington St. then west on I-10. CHP entered the pursuit and disabled the suspect vehicle near
Whitewater with a spike strip. The suspects abandoned the vehicle near Verbenia Ave. and fled on foot.
Deputy Michaels, Issac White and CHP officers gave chase. All three suspects were taken into custody a
short time later. The suspects were identified as Germaine Wheeler, Charles Spencer and Roldolph Pyne.
All three suspects were booked into the Indio Jail and a bail enhancement of one million dollars was
secured.
2125 hours- Deputy Reynolds arrested Anthony Sauceda for public intoxication after responding to the
51000 block of Avenida Mendoza regarding an unknown trouble. During the investigation, Sauceda
became uncooperative during a pat search for weapons. He was subsequently arrested and booked into the
Indio Jail.
Friday,1 -14-03 (116):
1616 hours - Deputy Quintero responded to Stater Bros Market, at the 78000 block of Hwy. 111, La Quinta
in reference to a 490.5 PC suspect in custody. Upon his arrival, he interviewed Clinton Doering, who
admitted to entering the store without money with the intent to steal groceries. Doering was stopped
walking out of the store with over $300.00 in groceries. Doering was booked into Indio jail for burglary.
1950 hours - Deputy Quintero again responded to Stater Bros Market, 78630 Hwy. 111, La Quinta in
reference to a shoplifter suspect in custody. Upon his arrival, he interviewed John Pavelak, who admitted
to entering the store without money to steal groceries. Pavelak was stopped walking out of the store with
over $400.00 in groceries, including 23 boxes of Sudafed. Pavelak was booked into Indio jail for burglary,
and SIB-E will be notified.
Saturday,11-15-03 (69):
0300 hours - Deputy Harter arrested Charles Rose for battery on spouse after responding to a domestic
dispute at the 54000 block of Shoal Creek, La Quinta. Charles and his wife, Tina Rose, were heard arguing
by their neighbors. Deputy Harter learned that Charles assaulted Tina during the argument. Charles
pushed Tina against a wall and then onto a bed. Charles was booked into Indio Jail.
At 2110 hours, Deputy Ortega responded to the 54000 block of Riviera Lane in La Quinta in reference to
an unattended death. Upon his arrival, he found that Nobunori Shigezaki, had died in his room. No signs
of foul play or trauma were found. Shigezaki was hospitalized for 6 months while in Japan, and was just
released a week ago to return home. The Coroner's office was notified and did not respond. Sgt. Shields
responded to assist.
Sunday.11-16-03 (60):
0430 hrs- Deputy Hendry responded to Ave. Rubio and Calle Chihuahua reference suspicious persons
sitting in a parked vehicle. Upon arrival, he met with Marco Lopez. Lopez was under the influence of
alcohol and was unable to provide a reasonable explanation for being in the area. Because Lopez was
unable to care for his safety or the safety of others, he was arrested for public intoxication and booked into
the Indio Jail. He was later released from custody.
At approx. 2100 hours, Deputy Krachman arrested Patricia Marsden for spousal abuse and for a parole
violation warrant at the 53000 block of Avenida Carranza, in La Quinta. Marsden assaulted her live in
boyfriend during a domestic dispute. Marsden was taken to JFK Hospital for an okay to book because she
was eight months pregnant. While at the hospital, Marsden's primary care doctor was contacted and he
demanded she be admitted due to her "High Risk" pregnancy. Because of Marsden's medical condition,
State Parole dropped their hold and we filed our case out of custody. Lt. Walker notified of the incident.
At approx. 1850 hours, Deputy Ortega arrested Richard Flaherty for driving under the influence of alcohol
at Avenue 48 and Jefferson. Flaherty fell asleep at the wheel at this intersection while waiting for a green
light. He was intoxicated and was arrested for D.U.I.
At approx. 1719 hours, Deputy Lewis arrested Ismael Gonzalez for shoplifter at the La Quinta Wal-Mart.
Gonzalez was caught stealing 2 compact dvd's by security.
ell
Monday,11-17-03 (63):
At approximately 0800 hours, Deputies from La Quinta received information that a 7-year-old Truman
Elementary School student brought a gun to school. It was determined that the student found a 2" blue
plastic toy gun at one of the bus stops and brought it to school and gave it to a yard supervisor. Truman
Elementary faculty and the bus driver were aware that it was a toy gun; however, alerted the police.
2002 hrs-Deputy Bashe responded to Fred Waring & Washington St. to investigate a two -vehicle collision.
P-1 Brittany Wiczek made left turn from south bound Washington St. to eastbound Fred Waring on a red
signal and was struck by P-2 Cortazar who was traveling northbound on Washington St.
Tuesday,11-18-03 (73):
1325 hours - Deputy Pierce responded to Wal-Mart reference telephone calls with the intent to annoy call.
Her investigation revealed that the victim, Lupe Basquez had received a call from her ex -boyfriend, Merl
Houston. He threatened to shoot her after she refused to meet him after work to talk about moving back in
with him. Deputy Pierce contacted him at his workplace (Ralph's / Indian Wells) and took him into
custody. He has a past history of domestic violence and TRO violations. He was booked at Indio Jail for
terrorist threats.
1730 hours - La Quinta SET assisted CVNTF with a search warrant at the 54000 block of Avenida Velasco
in La Quinta. They arrested Danny Cribbins for poss. for sale, transportation and receiving stolen property.
Officers located 80 grams of methamphetamine and seized over $6,000 in cash. Several stolen credit cards
were also located. Cribbins was booked into the Indio Jail.
Wednesdav,_11-19-03 (87):
2300 hours - Deputy Ervin arrested Philip Rodriguez for spousal abuse after responding to a domestic
dispute at the 51000 block of Avenida Martinez. Deputy Erivin's investigation revealed that Rodriguez
assaulted his girlfriend, Veronica Rico. Rico stated Rodriguez threw her into a wall and spat in her face.
Rico also had contusions on her body from previous assaults. Rodriguez was booked into Indio Jail.
Thursday,11-20-03 (100):
La Quinta motor units issued 42 traffic citations throughout the day.
Friday,11-21-03 (88):
1500 hours - Deputy Burns and Bianco arrested Francisco Barajas (20 years) for assault with a deadly
weapon after responding to the 52000 block of Avenida Ramirez for a disturbance. Deputies learned that
Barajas had thrown a knife at his stepfather. Barajas was booked into the Indio Jail.
Saturday,11-22-03 (76):
0230 hours - Members of the LQ SET observed a male acting strange near the Circle K store on Calle
Tampico. They monitored the individual, later identified as Paul Godine (43 years) did for approx. 20
minutes while he was in the store. They witnessed Godino steal several packs of cigarettes and other items.
Deputies later contacted Codine outside of the store and found him in possession of various stolen items.
Codine was arrested and a search of his vehicle was conducted. Deputies found several hypodermic
syringes, a small amount of marijuana and prescription medication. Codine was later booked into Indio Jail
for receiving stolen property, petty theft with priors, poss. of a syringe, poss. of a controlled substance and
poss. of marijuana.
2105 hours, Deputy Espinoza arrested Sergio Rios for vandalism at the 52000 block of Avenida Madero, in
La Quinta. Rios intentionally pushed his cousin's car into a garaged door causing extensive damage to the
door.
Sunday, 11-23-03 (54):
0200 hrs-Deputy Perez stopped a vehicle in the area of Obregon and Monterey for failing to stop at a
posted stop sign. The driver identified himself to be Jonathon Lopez. While talking with Lopez, it
appeared he had the signs of being under the influence of alcohol. Lopez performed FSTs to show his
sobriety. Based upon his FSTs, Lopez was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and booked
into the Indio Jail.
0441 hrs-Deputy Harter responded to a 911 domestic dispute at the 79000 block of Calle Palmeto. A child
phoned 911 and told the dispatcher that her mother and father were fighting. Upon his arrival, nobody
would answer the door. After making several verbal attempts to contact the homeowners, they came to the
front door. Deputy Harter met with Patrice Lucas and Patrick Lucas. During the investigation, Patrick
acted irate, waved his arms in a violent manner and continued to yell and make threats towards Patrice.
Based upon Patrick's violent and irate behavior, he was arrested for resisting arrest and booked him into the
Indio Jail.
Monday, 11-24-03 (64):
2320 hrs-Deputy Harter attempted to make a traffic stop on a silver Jaguar that ran a traffic signal at
Washington St and Ave 52. The vehicle was seen weaving back and forth on the roadway and appeared to
be a DUI driver. The vehicle failed to stop when Deputy Harter activated his overhead lights. Sgt. Pinon
authorized Deputy Harter to pursue the vehicle due to it being a possible DUI driver. The pursuit trailed in
and out of PGA West and ended in a T/C at Ave. and Jefferson St. at the turn about. The driver was later
identified to be Lewis Holmes of La Quinta. He was found to be very intoxicated. He was sent to Desert
Hospital for evaluation and was given an okay to book. None of the patrol units involved in the pursuit
were damaged. No Civilians were harmed. The only damage noted was to Holmes' vehicle where it had
collided into the turn -about. Some engine oil and other engine fluids leaked onto desert garden on the turn-
about. I phoned La Quinta Public works and told them about the accident that occurred on the turn -about
so the fluids could be cleaned up. Deputy Harter arrested Homes for driving under the influence and
evading a peace officer and booked him into the Indio Jail. Deputy Hendry assisted Deputy Harter by
handling the traffic accident portion of the pursuit.
0728 hours, Dep. Pierce arrested Dale Fort, for driving under the influence of alcohol. She stopped him at
Washington X Ave. 48. His B.A.C. was .10 /.10.
At 1910 hours, Sr. Deputy Gerrard was flagged down at Ave. 48 east of Adams in reference to a hit and run
traffic collision. Sr. Deputy Gerrard located George Casmir Lekaunas, of Indio on Ave. 48 west of Adams
being detained by the victim's father. Lekaunas was found to be intoxicated and was arrest for driving
under the influence of alcohol.
At 2220 hours, Deputy Bashe responded to the 53000 block of Avd. Cortez in reference to past assault with
a deadly weapon, where the suspect had returned. Upon his arrival, Deputy Bashe learned that on
11/18/03, a male juvenile, 16 years, had assaulted his father Phillip Carrillo. Carrillo wanted his son
arrested. The report was pulled, which showed that charges of assault with a deadly weapon had been filed
against Barboza. Barboza was booked into Juvenile Hall.
Tuesday,11-25-03 (88):
At 2045 hours, Deputy Lewis responded to the 77000 block of Calle Madrid in reference to an unattended
death. Upon her arrival, she learned that Helen Brown, of La Quinta had died at home of apparent natural
causes. Brown had a history of cancer, and was currently under a doctor's care for liver cancer. Sheriffs
coroner was called, but did not respond. Sgt. Shields responded to assist.
Wednesday, 11-26-03 (84):
No significant activity to report
Thursday,11-27-03 (56):
2340 hours - Deputy Russo responded to the Beer Hunter in La Quinta reference a domestic dispute in the
parking lot. Upon arrival, Deputy Russo contacted David and Diane Cisneros. Deputy Russo learned that
David had punched his wife 3 times in the face causing some swelling. David was booked into the Indio
Jail.
La Quinta SET arrested Jose Zavala (26 years) for driving under the influence of alcohol and willful harm
or injury to a child during a traffic stops in La Quinta. Zavala's 4 year -old son was in the vehicle with him.
Zavala's BAC. was approx..124.
Friday,11-28-03 (100):
2235 hours - Deputies Speir and Reynolds responded to the 49000 block of Eisenhower Dr. (La Quinta
Resorts) in reference to a suicidal subject wanting to jump from a two-story hotel room. The subject,
female juvenile, 15 years old, had been talked out of jumping by hotel security prior to our arrival.
Dubasso stated she wanted to kill herself and had numerous scars on her wrists from previous attempts.
Dubasso attempted to kick out a patrol unit window after being detained. Dubasso was transported to
Desert Hospital for a mentally disturbed hold.
Saturday, 11-29-03 (48):
Deputy Burns arrested Alexander Stojanovic of La Quinta at the Ralphs for theft with priors. Stojanovic
walked out of the store without paying for $534.00 worth of groceries. Stojanovic had a prior conviction
for shoplifting. Stojanovic was booked into Indio Jail.
Deputy Farley responded to annoying phone calls, call which turned out to be terrorist threats call. Victim
Rosa Radago is an employee of District Attorneys office. Her ex-husband, Henry Radago, made numerous
calls to her office and home and she had recording of him making threats against her life. He is graduate of
SBSO academy but was not picked up due to psych failure. She stated that he had possession of handgun at
the house in Indio. EPO obtained and then Deputy Farley contacted him at his residence with IPD
assisting. A 9mm Sig. taken under EPO and as part of the arrest. He stated he was embarrassed as he is
undergoing testing process for IPD. He was arrested and booked after interview in which he admitted, "Sort
of going off' on the phone.
Sunday,11-30-03 (52):
Deputy Gaunt arrested Richard Henke (41 years, La Quinta) for driving under the influence of alcohol at
Ave. Ramirez x Colima after he failed to stop for a stop sign.
Sgt. Vest arrested Gustavo Ramirez (40 years, Indio) for driving under the influence of alcohol at Jefferson
and Ave 50 after catching him speeding and weaving. BAC .20/. 21.
Total arrests for the Avoid the 30 Sweep in our region was 9. (4 by RSO-Indio, 3 by IPD, and 2 by
CHP).
At 1517 hours, Deputy Quintero responded to 79900 Hwy. 111 (Home Depot) in reference to a shoplifter in
custody. Upon his arrival, Deputy Quintero searched the suspect, John Valenzuela, of Indio and located
approximately 1.1 grams of methamphetamines in his wallet. Valenzuela was booked into Indio jail for
shoplifting and poss. off a controlled substance.
v . �
At 1700 hours, The La Quinta Special Enforcement Team arrested Robert Ruiz, of DHS for a P.A.L.
warrant during a vehicle stop at Fred Waring and Adams. Case to be handled by Deputy Coleman.
At 1904 hours, Deputy Bashe responded to 79900 Hwy. 111 (Home Depot) for a 490.5 PC suspect in
custody. Upon his arrival, Deputy Bashe questioned Santos Silva, about his address and ID, but Silva
could not provide the information. Silva was booked into Indio Jail for a Cal ID hold and shoplifting.
At 2030 hours, Deputy Lewis arrested Armando Raya, of Indio for driving under the influence of alcohol,
during a traffic stop at Hwy. 111 and Auto Center Dr. in La Quinta. While Raya was being detained in the
back seat of Deputy Lewis' unit, Raya became combative and was hobbled. Raya was able to loosen the
hobble and kicked out the right rear window of the unit. Raya was transported to the Indio station for
chemical testing, and was released to his parents. Charges of driving under the influence if alcohol and
vandalism to be filed with Juvenile Court Probation. Sgt. Shields was notified and the Accord form has
been completed.
Total calls for service: 2151
— `1
.3 .i tJ
CITY of LA QUINT
MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT
November 2003
School: La Quinta High School
Deputy: Robert Brooker
15- Criminal Reports
2- Non -Criminal Incidents
10- Arrests
4- DA Filings
4- YAT Referrals
0- Traffic Stops
0- Vehicle Checks
0- Business Checks
School Session: November 3rd through November 28th, 2003
Highlights:
• During this period of time I have assisted the school staff with medical
aids and parents who are having problems with their high school age
students attending school, or cooperating at home, and conducted follow-
up investigation on student who had been reported as runaway juveniles.
• I investigated incidents that occurred at school, which range from
possession of marijuana on school grounds, truants, and fights between
students.
• Other incidents were: a male student was the recipient of 14 birthday
punches from a female student on his 14th birthday, two students lighting
toilet paper on fire in the boys bathroom and then they tried to light the
bushes behind the JV softball field on fire. This last case is being reviewed
by the DA for prosecution.
• Two significant incidents I handled this month are: a sexual battery where
a male student touched the breasts and or buttocks of several female
students. The male student as been suspended, pending an expulsion
hearing. The second incident is the school grade/attendance computer
crime, where grades and or attendance records were changed. This
investigation resulted in 9 students being suspended, pending expulsion.
The DA is reviewing both cases for these cases for potential charges.
CITY of LA QUINTA
MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT
November 2003
SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL
Deputy: Robert Burbach
COPS Grant Funded Position
sehnni Session: November 1st through November 31st, 2003.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Battery -I handled a battery on school grounds on 11/3.One student assaulted
another student resulting with the victim student needing 3 stitches on his upper
lip and possibly a cracked tooth. Student was suspended and is facing expulsion.
My report was sent to the Juvenile DA for a Felony Battery filing.
• Battery/Disturbance- One student threatened to beat up another student and then
kicked that student in the leg. Referred to YAT.
• Shoplifting -Student concealed a Snapple drink from the lunch line. Referred to YAT
• Battery on a teacher- Student tapped a teacher on the head. Negative injuries.
Student was suspended facing an expulsion hearing.
• False Report of an emergency- Fire Alarm pulled on 11/06. Report taken however
case will be suspended due to unknown suspect.
• False Report ofan emergency- 911 hang up on 11/25 from pay phone at the La Quinta
Sports Complex which is adjacent to the school grounds. Investigation revealed that
a 8th grade student dialed 911 and then hung up. Student was referred to YAT.
• Spoke with several different students regarding name-calling occurring at the
school. Students were advised of the consequences if the behavior continued.
0 4W
LA QUINTA POLICE MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY REPORT
PROGRAM STATISTICS
NOVEMBER 2003
Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams
Speed Violations
Fail to Yield
Turning Violations
Stop Sign Violations
Signal Light Violations
Child Seat Violations
266
Lane Change Violation
Seat Belt Violations
DUI Arrests
Misd. Arrest
Felony arrest
Warnings
12
Tows
Injury T/C
I Non -Injury T/C
Suspended DL
Non -Moving
H&S
16
2
2
2
6
1
7
18
5
18
21
0
89
11
45
3
HIGHLIGHTS
110303 - Private property T/C @ Shell.
110303 - Minor injury T/C @ Eisenhower x Coachella. PCF 21703 CVC.
110303 - Minor -injury T/C @ Washington and Via Bolero. PCF 21802(a) CVC
110603 - Non -injury T/C @ SR 111 and Plaza La Quinta. PCF 22350 CVC.
111003 - Non -injury T/C @ Fred Waring x port Maria. PCF 22350 CVC.
111003 - Minor injury T/C @ SR 111 x Adams. PCF 21453(a) CVC.
112403 - Minor -injury T/C @ Ave. 48 and Dune Palms. PCF 21453(a) CVC.
112603 - Hit and Run T/C @ Ave. 52 and Citerino. PFC 21453(b) CVC.
112803- Non -injury T/C @ SR 111 and Dune Palms. PCF 21703 CVC.
.; a
La Quinta Police Department
Special Enforcement Team
(Dep. Coleman, Dep. Myers, Dep. Wedert4 Cpl. BlacK)
The following is a summary of the Special Enforcement Team activities for the month of November.
Ongoing Investigations
8
Probation Searches
2
Parole Searches
0
Arrests/ Filings
8
Vehicle checks
33
Business Contacts
10
Investigation assists
12
Arrest Warrants Served
1
Arrest Warrants Attempted
3
Programs
0
Pedestrian Checks
11
Crime Prevention Hours
80
Bar Checks
0
Back-ups
32
Follow-ups
22
Search Warrants
1
Meetings
2
Recovered Stolen Property
5
Citations issued
5
Surveillance's
5
Property Checks
21
Civil Commitments
0
Bicycle Time
0
Training Hours
24
Illegal Drugs Seized
80 grams
Total Mileage: 1845 miles
Noteworthy Accomplishments:
• La Quinta SET- in a joint effort with the Coachella Valley Narcotics Task Force arrested Danny Ray
Cribbins of La Quinta, for possession of methamphetamine for sales. A search warrant was executed
at his La Quinta Cove residence. The search resulted in the seizure of 80 grams of
methamphetamine and over $8,000 in cash. La Quinta SET Deputies also located several stolen
credit cards in Cribbins' vehicle. An investigation relating to the stolen credit cards continues.
• La Quinta SET -assisted, in the investigation of an armed robbery which occurred at the La Quinta PFF
bank. Three suspects fled the scene and were pursued by deputies from the Indio Sheriffs Station.
They all were later apprehended and $50,000 in cash was recovered. The three suspects are in
federal custody pending charges of multiple bank robberies.
• La Quinta SET -Arrested Lisa Nawrocki, 26 years, of Bermuda Dunes for a Felony warrant.
• La Quinta SET- Arrested Paul Lewis Goldfine, 42 years, of Palm Desert for Commercial Burglary,
Theft w/ Priors, possession of a schedule IV drug, possession of hypodermic needles and possession
of marijuana.
• La Quinta Set -Arrested Jose Antonio Zavala,26 years, of La Quinta for Child Endangerment and DUI.
• La Quinta SET caught two male juveniles in the act of commercial burglary at the Ralph's grocery
store on Calle Tampico at Washington Street. Both juveniles were released to their parents with
felony charges filed.
• La Quinta SET responded to a suspicious person at the new Starbuck's store, currently under
construction on Washington Street north of Calle Tampico. Dennis Burkett, 47 years of La Quinta,
was contacted at the location. Burkett was very evasive and was found to be in possession of bolt
cutters, 2 flashlights, binoculars, and a screwdriver. Burkett has priors for burglary and petty theft.
• After three separate calls of indecent exposure within the cove area of La Quinta, the La Quinta SET
team was able to consolidate the investigations and identified the suspect as Jorge Bravo, 23 years
of Coachella. Jorge Bravo was subsequently arrested and he sentenced to 16 months in prison and
will be required to register as a sex offender upon his release.
CITY of LA QUINTA
MONTHLY COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER REPORT
C.S.O.: Monica Santillanes
C_S_0_: Thomas Fowler
November 2003
Summary of Months Activity
Type of Activity
Number of Incidents
Burglary Investigations
25
Grand Theft Reports
10
PettyTheft Reports
11
Vandalism/Malicious Mischief Reports
8
Vehicle Theft or Recovery Reports
4
Traffic Collision Reports
9
Vehicle Code or Parking Citations
35
Abandoned Vehicles tagged w/warning
21
Towed Vehicles
21
Lost or Found Property Reports
13
Public Assistance
5
Follow ups to previous cases
4
Custodial and Non -Custodial Trans orts
3
Area checks of La Quinta Skate Park
15
City of La Quinta
Community Oriented Policing Office and Volunteers Report
November, 2003
Highlights:
• The volunteer program presently has five volunteers staffing the La Quinta office
full time.
• Nine new volunteers have finished training in Indio or are in the process of
completing 16 hours before training in La Quinta. We had two volunteers leave
the program; one moved from the area and one has a job where the hours were
not compatible.
• All volunteers receive ongoing training in all areas. In January classes will begin
once per month in all departments to familiarize all volunteers with various
procedures throughout the department.
• One volunteer makes the Crossroads Collision Database entries and has been
entering all La Quinta traffic collisions, traffic and parking citations into the
system from the COPS Office.
• One volunteer will assist in implementing the Crime Free Multi Housing Program
in January.
• The bicycle registration program will be the first to be initiated by the volunteers
and should be in full swing by January, 2004 after appropriate notification to the
community.
• 143 hours of volunteer time was recorded in November, not including initial
training hours.
• 120 walk in request were handled in the COPS Office in November.
1) U
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
INDIO STATION
82695 Dr. Carreon Blvd.
Indio, California 92201
November 2003 Explorer Post 503 Program
Report
Submitted by Explorer Post Advisor Andy Gerrard
Training meetings were held on November 5, 12, and 19. The
meetings covered one Border Patrol presentation, building searches,
physical training, and 3 capture the flag games. Border Patrol
personnel from the Indio Border Patrol station handled the Border
Patrol lecture. Explorer Lieutenant Michael Yocom, Explorer
Sergeant Juan Viramontes & I coordinated the building searches.
Explorer Captain Alejandro Barragan and I led the physical training
and capture the flag games.
Some Explorer Post 503 Explorers volunteered & assisted with traffic
control at the November 8 Chiriaco Summit Veterans Day event.
Explorer Post 503 is currently seeking applicants for the volunteer
position of Explorer. Explorers receive law enforcement related
training, participate in physical training (running, push ups, sit ups,
etc.), assist at volunteer events, go on ride -a -longs with deputies,
compete at competitions, attend approx. a one week academy, and
have fun outings.
Some of the requirements to join Post 503 include be between 14-21
years old, maintain at least a "C" grade average, follow instructions,
be a team player, have an interest in law enforcement, have no
physical limitations, obtain your parents permission, pass a
background investigation, be committed to attend meetings, and
volunteer at some special events. Interested in the program? Call
863-8105 or 863-8990 to make an appointment with a Post 503
advisor.
CITY OF LA Q UINTA
CRIME STATISTICS SUMMARY
OCTOBER 2003
CITY OF LA QUINTA
OCTOBER CRIME COMPARISONS
OCTOBER
2003
OCTOBER
2002
YTD (03)
YTD (02)
CRIME
0
0
2
3
HOMICIDE
0
1
8
7
RAPE
0
1
12
11
SEX CRIMES (FEL)
4
4
11
18
SEX CRIMES SD
ROBBERY
2
2
17
17
15
6
87
91
ASSAULT (FEL)
13
20
169
190
ASSAULT MISD
57
38
573
504
BURGLARY
7
11
95
121
VEHICLE THEFT
19
16
219
261
THEE FEL
37
37
329
417
THEFT MISD
35
35
275
343
VANDALISM MISD
17
6
127
107
DOM. VIOLENCE
8
19
65
105
NARCOTICS
3
4
67
116
DUI
T/C NON -INJURY
27
60
276
527
0
7
26
71
T/C INJURY
0
1
2
2
T/C FATAL
459
714
3092
4211
TRAFFIC CITATIONS
2003 STATISTICS DO NOT INCLUDE ATTEMPTS
k'e)
N
0
O
h-
H
GJ
C7
[I
MI
O O � d0' M N O
ti O
m
I-
LL
t:
W
H
w
w
co
LL
J
Q
a
R
W
a
9
O O
O O
LO ch M N r-
f r-". A
i
Q
J
w
co
O
U
O
z
O
D
m
N
U)
0
w
U
8
U") M N � �
M N � r' �
w
0
iR
0
00
C*4
LLI
ow
F- UJ
0
OD
O
W r
UW
OC �
W Q
U) Q
OU)
�LJL
IL
U)w
J W
J �
Q �
UW
U-
U)
Ow
zW
Ow
Wo
ryW
�U)
�o
OQ
U
0 o a o o
LO o o
N N 'r
6,"
0
Cl)
70
c
,
co,^
V!
O
1
M
N
O
N
N
O LO O in C)
N T- r'
vV+.�
q
0
0
N
W
m
O
F--
U
O
F-
F-
U
Q
C)
H
LL
Q
F-
U-
O
z
O
CJ)
N
Q
n
2
O
U
M
N
00
00
N
N
0
00
m
Flo
a
z
U
I
CITY OF LA QUINTA
DISPATCH INFORMATION / OCTOBER 2003
TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME ES NUMBER OF INCIDENTS
EMERGENCY 2.8 2
ROUTINE 9.3 1178
*STATS TAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S DATA WAREHOUSE AVERAGE. RESPONSE TIME REPORT
a
r ., ---.
i t> ►Ir
e�� 1;1C(Wh1AS.P ��
G� OF
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of
Resolutions and an Ordinance on: 1) Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 to Certify a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of Environmental Impact; 2) General Plan
Amendment .2003-093 and Zone Change 2003-1 16
to Change Land Use and Zoning Designations from
Medium Density Residential to Low Density
Residential, and Mixed/Regional Commercial to
Neighborhood Commercial and Relocate the
Neighborhood Commercial Designation, Add Golf
Course Designation, and Eliminate the Major
Community Facility Designation; 3) Cancellation of
Williamson Act Contract for ± 195 acres; 4) Specific
Plan 2003-067 for Development Principles and Design
Guidelines for Two 18-Hole Golf Courses, Associated
Facilities and 1,400 Residential Units; and 5) Site
Development Permit 2003-787 for Development Plans
for Two 18-Hole Golf Courses, Associated Facilities
and 1,400 Residential Units for the Property Located
at the Northwest Corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe
Street. Applicant: Coral Option I, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING: +
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-
483; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment
2003-093 to change land use designations from Medium Density Residential
to Low Density Residential, and Mixed/Regional Commercial to Neighborhood
Commercial and relocate the Neighborhood Commercial designation, add Golf
Course designation, and eliminate the Major Community Facility designation;
and
S;\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc
Motion to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive
further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading
approving Zone Change 2003-1 16 to change the zoning districts from Medium
Density Residential to Low Density Residential, and Mixed/Regional
Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial and relocate the Neighborhood
Commercial designation, add Golf Course designation, and eliminate the Major
Community Facility designation; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Cancellation of
Land Conservation Contract (Williamson Act) for ± 195 acres in Coachella
Valley Agricultural Preserve No. 58; and.
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2003-067 for
development principles and design guidelines for two 18-hole golf courses,
associated facilities and 1,400 residential units; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit
2003-787 for development plans for two 18-hole golf courses, associated
facilities and 1,400 residential units.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The vacant site is approximately 942 acres in size and located at the northwest
corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe Street (Attachment 1). A majority of the project
site was part of the original Coral Mountain Specific Plan (SP No. 218, Amendment
1.) which, included 1,280 acres, and was approved by the County of Riverside on
August 15, 2000. Of this acreage, ± 474 acres are under construction by Shea
Homes for the project known as Trilogy. The remaining 806 acres are either vacant
or in agricultural use. The applicant owns ± 587 acres of the remaining 806 acres
and has recently acquired an additional ± 355 acres and proposes to incorporate it
into this new proposal. The additional ± 355 acres are not part of any prior
Specific Plan. Attachment 2 shows the original (SP No. 218, Amendment 1)
project boundary in relation to the new (Specific Plan 03-067) project boundary.
The purpose of the new Specific Plan is to disassociate the new project from the
original project (Coral Mountain Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment 1), in order to
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc
3�9
have a stand-alone document that establishes development principles and design
guidelines. Development in the areas remaining under the original Coral Mountain
Specific Plan boundary will be guided by the original Coral Mountain Specific Plan
No. 218, Amendment 1.
Project Proposal
The applicant is requesting approval of the following:
1. General Plan Amendment (Attachment 3) and Zone Change (Attachment 4)
to:
a. Change land uses and zoning designations from Medium Density
Residential to Low Density Residential, Mixed/Regional Commercial to
Neighborhood Commercial and relocate the Neighborhood Commercial
land uses from their current location north of Avenue 60, between
Madison Street and Monroe Street, further north to the southwest and
southeast corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58.
b. Add a Golf Course designation to the additional land recently acquired.
C. Eliminate the Major Community Facility designation.
The following table represents the losses and gains in terms of land uses as a result
of the proposed project. This table reflects only the land that pertains to the
applicant from the original Coral Mountain Specific Plan and the newly acquired
area. Approximately 122 acres of Medium Density Residential land use designation
will be eliminated and replaced with the Low Density Residential land use
designation. Note that the additional ± 355 acres will be designated Low Density
Residential and Golf Course.
Existing
General Plan/Zoning
Designation
Existing
Acres
Proposed
General
Plan/Zoning
Designation
Proposed
Acres
MDR/RM
122.00
MDR/RM
0
LDR/RL
78.00
LDR/RL
497.00
MRC/MRC
03.00
NC/CN
10.00
G/GC
383.00
G/GC
435.00
MC/MC
01.00
MC/MC
0
Totals
587.00
942.00*
MDR/RM = Medium Density Residential (up to 8 dwelling units per acre)
LDR/RL = Low Density Residential (up to 4 dwelling units per acre)
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc to
G/GC = Golf Course/Golf Course
MRC/MRC = Mixed Regional Commercial
MC/MC = Major Community Facility
* includes an additional ±355 acres
Under the original Coral Mountain Specific Plan, 701 homes were approved. The
project proposes 1,400 units, which includes the additional ± 355 acres of land.
The project falls within the density allowed under the Low Density Residential Land
Use designation of up to four dwelling units per acre. The residential dwelling units
include single-family attached and detached units ranging in size from ± 3,150
square feet to ± 3,650 square feet. The applicant has not yet submitted Tentative
Tract Maps for the project. The applicant will be required to obtain approval of a
Tract Map(s), prior to obtaining building permits.
The applicant proposes to change the Mixed/Regional Commercial designation to
Neighborhood Commercial and relocate them from their current location north of
Avenue 60, between Madison Street and Monroe Street, further north to the
southwest and southeast corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Commercial
uses have not been determined but generally include those uses listed under the
Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District, such as food, drugs, sundries and
personal services to meet the daily needs of the neighborhood area.
The Golf Course designation is required to designate the golf courses.
The applicant is proposing to eliminate the Major Community Facility designation
shown on the General Plan Land Use Map on the north side of Avenue 60, between
Madison Street and Monroe Street. This designation was required as part of the
previous project approval to allow the Riverside County Fire Department the
opportunity to construct a fire station along Avenue 60. To eliminate this land use
designation, the applicant will have to demonstrate that a fire station is not
required. Staff has provided a Condition of Approval (Condition No. 67, Specific
Plan 03-067) that requires the applicant to obtain the consent of the Riverside
County Fire Department to eliminate the Major Community Facility designation or
satisfy the Fire Department requirements, including the provision that a one -acre
site be provided within or in the general vicinity of the Specific Plan.
Approximately ± 195 acres of the newly acquired property lies within land subject
to a Land Conservation Contract (Williamson Act) (Attachment 5). The applicant
proposes to cancel this contract and has filed a Notice of Cancellation with the
County of Riverside. California Code Section 51284 requires that the City Council
tentatively approve the cancellation as part of this entitlement process. Part of the
cancellation process requires that the City Council adopt a Resolution tentatively
approving the cancellation of the contract. The County will process the
cancellation request.
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc
The applicant is also requesting approval of a Specific Plan (Attachment 6), which
will establish development and design guidelines, and a Site Development Permit
(Attachment 7) for development of the following:
a. Two 18-hole golf courses;
b. 16,400 square foot golf clubhouse;
C. 4,000 square foot swim & tennis facility;
d. 400 square foot gatehouse;
e. 14,000 square foot maintenance building; and
f. 1,400 attached and detached residential units ranging in size from ± 3,150
square feet to ± 3,650 square feet.
Architecture
The overall design theme of the project is Spanish style architecture, with hip and
gable roofs using clay barrel tile, columns, porticos, smooth stucco finishes, and
arched entries. Accent features include wood, tile and decorative wrought iron.
The applicant also proposes varied off -sets within the facades to break up the mass
of the buildings. Other amenities including porches, balconies, patios, courtyards,
arcades, plazas and paseos will be incorporated within each Planning Area of the
project.
Development Standards
The applicant is requesting that the following development standards be a part of
the project. The table below shows the development standards by Planning Area
as specified in the Specific Plan.
Planning Area/
Max.
No. of
Min.
Parking
Land Use
Bldg. Ht.
Stories
Setbacks (2)
Spaces
(1)
I - Golf Clubhouse,
35'
1-2
Front: 5'-8'
1 /250 sq. ft.
Gatehouse, Swim and Tennis
Side: 5'-10'
(3)
Area
II - Low Density Residential
28'
2
Front: 5'-10'
2/unit
Side: 5'-10'
III - Low Density Residential
28'
1-2
Front: 5'-10'
2/unit
Side: 5'-10'
IV - Golf Course Maintenance
28'
1
Front: 5'-8.'
1 /250 sq. ft.
Facility
Side: 5'-10'
V - Neighborhood
35'
2
Front: 10'
1 /250 sq. ft.
Commercial
Rear: 10'
Side: 5'-10'
VI - Golf Course
28'
2
Front: 5'-8'
5/hole
Side: 5'-10'
'J .,
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc
(1) - Buildings within 150 feet of a Primary Image Corridor, or a Major or Primary Arterial, will be restricted to a
maximum of 22 feet in height, not including architectural projections, such as chimneys, bell towers, spires,
etc.
(2) - AC units, trellis elements, pools and spas are allowed to encroach into side and rear yard setbacks.
Since no rear yard setbacks are requested, the project will have to comply with the Zoning Code
rear building setback of 20 feet.
(3) - For golf course uses, additional parking shall be required for additional uses on site such as swimming area
and tennis courts.
Landscaping
The proposed landscaping for the project consists of a wide variety of trees,
shrubs, ground covers, vines and accents. The proposed landscaping will provide
visual relief, compliment the structures and provide an overall design that includes a
wide selection of drought tolerant landscaping that is prevalent throughout the City.
Access
Vehicular access is provided via Madison Street and Monroe Street. Madison
Street bisects the project area in a north to south direction and provides two
primary points of direct access into the project. Monroe Street borders the eastern
boundary where a secondary point of access is located at approximately mid point
between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. Private roadways are proposed within the
development, which will provide access to other land uses including the clubhouse,
golf courses, and swim and tennis facility.
Access to the two commercial sites at the southwest and southeast corner of
Avenue 58 and Madison Street, are provided at two locations for each site. Each
site has access from Avenue 58 and Madison Street.
Architecture & Landscape Architecture Review (ALRC)
This project was presented to the ALRC at their October 1, 2003 meeting. The
Committee discussed the project and identified one issue for consideration by the
Planning Commission, which included the following:
1. Restrict the use of "Pine" trees within the golf course area only.
Historic Preservation Commission (HPC)
This project was presented to the HPC at their November 20, 2003 meeting. The
Commission discussed the project and recommended the following conditions be
added to the permit:
1. The site shall be monitored during on- and off -site trenching and rough
grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors
•? rl J
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc
shall be given to the City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing
permit.
2. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
3. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for
the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field
notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
Planning Commission
This project was presented to the Planning Commission at their meeting of
November 25, 2003. The Commission discussed the project and unanimously
recommended approval (Attachment 8).
Public Notice
This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on December 6, 2003,
and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no letters
have been received. Any written comments received will be handed out at the
meeting.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Findings to adopt Resolutions and an Ordinance approving EA 2003-483, GPA
2003-093, ZC 2003-116, AP 2003-001, SP 2003-067, and SDP 2003-787 can be
made and are contained in the attached Resolutions and Ordinance. Staff
recommends that the City Council approve the following actions:
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-
483; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment
2003-093 to change land use designations from Medium Density Residential
to Low Density Residential, and Mixed/Regional Commercial to Neighborhood
Commercial and relocate the Neighborhood Commercial designation, add Golf
Course designation, and eliminate the Major Community Facility designation;
and
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc
Motion to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive
further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading
approving Zone Change 2003-1 16 to change the zoning districts from Medium
Density Residential to Low Density Residential, and Mixed/Regional
Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial and relocate the Neighborhood
Commercial designation, add Golf Course designation, and eliminate the Major
Community Facility designation; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Cancellation of
Land Conservation Contract (Williamson Act) for f 195 acres in Coachella
Valley Agricultural Preserve No. 58; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2003-067 for
development principles and design guidelines for two 18-hole golf courses,
associated facilities and 1,400 residential units; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit
2003-787 for development plans for two 18-hole golf courses, associated
facilities and 1,400 residential units; or
2. Do not adopt Resolutions approving Environmental Assessment 2003-483,
thereby, denying the project in its entirety; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
4yeHer nmunity Development Director
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map
2. Original vs. Proposed Project Boundary Map
3. General Plan Amendment Map
4. Zone Change Map
r 7
. rJ
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc
5. Land Conservation Contract (Williamson Act) Map
6. Specific Plan document
7. Site Development Permit Plan Set
8. Planning Commission Minutes of November 25, 2003
(excerpts)
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 1 Coral.doc J'�
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PREPARED FOR GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-093, ZONE CHANGE 2003-
116, SPECIFIC PLAN 2003-067 AND SITE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-787
CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-483
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 16th day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
Environmental Assessment 2003-483 for a General Plan Amendment and Zone
Change to change land uses and zoning designations from Medium Density
Residential to Low Density Residential and Golf Course, Mixed/Regional Commercial
to Neighborhood Commercial and relocate the Neighborhood Commercial land uses
to the southwest and southeast corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58, and
eliminate the Major Community Facility designation; a Specific Plan to establish
development standards and design guidelines and a Site Development Permit for
development of two 18-hole golf courses,,a 16,400 square foot golf clubhouse,
4,000 square foot swim & tennis facility, 400 square foot gatehouse, 14,000
square foot maintenance building, and 1,400 attached and detached residential
model units ranging in size between ± 3,150 square feet and ± 3,650 square feet,
generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe Street, more
particularly described as follows:
APNs: 764-200-001 thru 007; 764-210-001 thru 006
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 25' day of November, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public
Hearing to recommend to the City Council approval of Environmental Assessment
2003-483; and,
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in
that the Community Development Department has prepared an Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 and determined that although the proposed project could
have a significant adverse impact on the environment, mitigation measures have
been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less than significant
levels, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact is
recommended for certification; and,
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoEA.doc
City Council Resolution 2003-
Environmental Assessment 2003-483
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments,
if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the
following findings to certify said Environmental Assessment:
1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general
welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that mitigation
measures have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less
than significant levels.
2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered
plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory in that the project site has been conditioned to
mitigate impacts to biological and cultural resources to less than significant
levels.
3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the
potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which
the wildlife depends in that the Environmental Assessment did not identify any
significant wildlife resources on the site.
4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term
environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as
significant effects on environmental factors will be reduced to less than
significant levels as identified in the Environmental Assessment.
5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or
cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development
in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be
significantly affected by the proposed project in that the site will be developed
with less intensity than the current land use designations under the General
Plan.
6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely
affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, in that the
Environmental Assessment did not identify any significant impacts which
would affect human health, risk potential, or public services.
.I. 0
City Council Resolution 03-
Environmental Assessment 2003-483
Coral Option 1, LLC
December 16, 2003
7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project
may have a significant effect on the environment in that mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to a less than
significant level.
8. The City Council has considered Environmental Assessment 2003-483 and
said Assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City.
9. The City Council has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the
presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d).
10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the
Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La
Quinta, California, 92253.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council for this Environmental Assessment.
2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2003-483 for the
reasons set forth in this Resolution and, as stated in the Environmental
Assessment Checklist on file in the Community Development Department
and attached hereto.
3. That Environmental Assessment 2003-483 reflects the independent
judgment of the City.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council held on this 161h day of December, 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoEA.doc _
City Council Resolution 03-
Environmental Assessment 2003-483
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoEA.doc
PAGES 13-16 ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE STAFF
REPORT DUE TO MISNUMBERING.
Environmental Checklist Form
1. Project title: General Plan Amendment 2003-093, Zone Change 2003-116, Specific Plan 03-
067, Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No. 218, Site Development Permit 2003-787, Coral
Option I
2. Lead agency name and address: City of La Quinta
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
3. Contact person and phone number: Martin Magana
760-777-7125
4. Project location: Between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60, and between Jefferson Street and
Monroe Street.
5. Project sponsor's name and address: Coral Option I, LLC
79-285 Rancho La Quinta Dr.
La Quinta, CA 92253
6. General Plan Designation: Current: Low
Density Residential, Medium Density
Residential, Golf Course,
Mixed/Regional Commercial, Major
Community Facility
Proposed: Low Density Residential, Golf
Course, Neighborhood Commercial
7. Zoning: Current: Low Density Residential,
Medium Density Residential, Golf Course,
Mixed/Regional Commercial, Major
Community Facility
Proposed: Low Density Residential, Golf
Course, Neighborhood Commercial
8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
The proposed project consists of a 587 acre portion of the previously approved Coral
Mountain Specific Plan, which was reviewed under CEQA through an Environmental Impact
Report and associated addenda, by both the County of Riverside and the City of La Quinta. In
addition to these previously reviewed lands, a 355 acre addition is proposed, for a total
project area of 942 acres. The 355 acre addition has not been previously proposed for
development, and therefore has not previously been reviewed under CEQA.
The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are required to reduce the proposed density
on the site from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, on the west side of
Madison, to add Golf Course designation to Low Density Residential on the east side of
Madison, and to change Mixed/Regional Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial and
relocate the land uses to a different portion of the site than that approved in Specific Plan 218.
In the previous plan, the commercial designation was located on Avenue 60, east of Madison
Street. The proposed Specific Plan will locate 10 acres of Neighborhood Commercial,
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc
J.
divided evenly on the southwest and southeast corners of Avenue 58 and Madison Street.
Also, the applicant requests the elimination of the Major Community Facility designation on
the General Plan Land Use Map.
Specific Plan 2003-067 includes lands previously included in Specific Plan 218 (see below),
as well as lands which currently have no entitlements. The Specific Plan includes design
standards and guidelines, and facilitates the construction of up to 1,400 attached and detached
single family homes on 497 acres, golf course on 435 acres, and 10 acres of neighborhood
commercial land uses at the southwest and southeast corners of Avenue 58 and Madison
Avenue. The golf course designation would also include maintenance and clubhouse
facilities.
The Site Development Permit establishes plans for the construction of the facilities within the
Specific Plan boundary, including attached and detached residential, golf course and tennis
facilities, and ancillary maintenance facilities.
The purpose of the Specific Plan (Coral Option) is to delete lands previously included in the
Coral Mountain Specific Plan, and now included in Specific Plan 2003-067 in one document,
described above. No other change is proposed.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
North: Single family residential, golf course (Norman Estates)
South: Bureau of Reclamation Levee, Coral Mountain Specific Plan (Trilogy)
West: Bureau of Reclamation Levee, Parks and Recreation
East: Single family residential, Ag lands, vacant desert lands
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement.)
Coachella Valley Water District
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -2- " v
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Biological Resources
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Mineral Resources
Public Services
Utilities / Service
Systems
Agriculture Resources
Cultural Resources
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Noise
Recreation
Air Quality
Geology /Soils
Land Use / Planning
Population / Housing
Transportation/Traffic
Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
X environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the
project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and
an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable
standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature
November 3, 2003
Date
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -3-
r Aff
J 4J
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EM PACTS :
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources
show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project
falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based
on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive
receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as
operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the
checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant
with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact"
to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures
from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from
the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the
project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared
or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where
the statement is substantiated.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -4-
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) ' The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -5- ��
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
I. AESTHETICS — Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
X
scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
X
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway? (Aerial
photograph)
c) Substantially degrade the existing
X
visual character or quality of the site and
its surroundings? (Application materials)
d) Create a new source of substantial
X
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
(Application materials)
I. a)-c) The proposed Specific Plan and associated Site Development Permit propose the
construction of one and two story residential, golf course associated facilities and
commercial structures. Most of the construction will occur away from the project
boundary, in the interior of the site. Madison Street and Avenue 58 are designated as
Agrarian Image Corridors in the General Plan and the project will comply with the
requirements. There are no significant landforms located in the immediate vicinity of the
project. The Coral Reef Mountains, located to the west and south of the project site, are
sufficiently distant from the site so as to still be visible from the project and surrounding
development. The proposed project is consistent with other development in the area,
which consists of single and two story residential projects, often on golf courses. Impacts
to aesthetics are expected to be less than significant.
I. d) The proposed project will generate light from the commercial parcels located at Avenue
58 and Madison, as well as from residential outdoor lighting, and the lighting of facilities
at the golf and tennis club. All lighting on the site will be required to conform to the
City's Dark Sky Ordinance, which prohibit "spillover" from the site. Further, the more
intensely lit land uses will be located in less sensitive areas (either at a street intersection,
or within the center of the golf course), and will have little potential to affect surrounding
sensitive uses. Impacts associated with light and glare are expected to be less than
significant.
22
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -6- `= �3
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
Would the project.
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
X
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21
ff.)
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
X
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract? (Zoning Map, letter of 9/23/03 from
Selzer, Ealy, Hemphill & Blasdel)
c) Involve other changes in the existing
X
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
(General Plan Land Use Map)
H. a)-c) Three parcels within the proposed project consisting of ±195 acres, and generally located
in the southeastern quadrant of the site, have previously been under Williamson Act
contract. Additionally, portions of the site have been in agriculture in the past. The
balance of the site is vacant desert lands. A formal request to cancel the Williamson Act
contracts is being processed by the City for parcels affected by such a designation. The
applicant will have to pay a cancellation fee in the amount of $1,168,125.00 to Riverside
County within one year of cancellation of the contract.
Based on aerial photos of the site, it appears that a majority of the ±355 acres included in
the Specific Plan area have been in agricultural use. The development of the project
would therefore result in the conversion of about ±195 acres from agriculture to urban
uses. The remainder of the site encompasses vacant desert lands. The property is not
designated as prime agricultural land in the General Plan, and is developing at lower
densities than originally envisioned in the General Plan. The project is adjacent to
developing or developed land uses, in an area of the City which has been urbanizing for a
number of years. The site is within the corporate limits of the City, and as such is
expected to develop in urban land uses. Although portions of the site which have
previously been used for agriculture will no longer be available for such use, the acreage
involved represents a very small percentage of the total acreage in agriculture in the
eastern Coachella Valley. Impacts to agricultural resources are therefore expected to be
less than significant.
23
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -7-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
X
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook)
b) Violate any air quality standard or
X
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD
CEQA Handbook)
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable
X
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook,
2002 PM10 Plan for the Coachella Valley)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to
X
substantial pollutant concentrations?
(Project Description, Aerial Photo, site
inspection)
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
X
substantial number of people? (Project
Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection)
M. a), b) & c) The City's primary source of pollution is the automobile. The proposed project includes
the development of up to 1,400 residential units, golf course facilities (36 holes) and
neighborhood commercial land uses which could generate up to 109,000 square feet of
commercial space. These land uses could generate up to 19,362 daily trips at the site'.
This calculation does not account for complementary use between the three land uses, and
is therefore considered conservative. Actual trips generated could be 25% less. Based on
this traffic generation, and an average trip length of 10 miles, the following emissions can
be expected to be generated from the project site.
1 "Trip Generation, 6`h Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, categories 430 — golf course, 210 — single
family housing, and 820 — shopping center. ; , 0414
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -8- �4
Moving Exhaust Emission Projections at Project Buildout
(pounds per day)
Total No. Vehicle Trips/Day
Ave. Trip
Total
Length (miles)
miles/day
19,362
x 10
=
193,620
Pollutant ROC
CO NOX PM10
PM10
PM10
Exhaust
Tire Wear
Brake Wear
Grams at 50 mph 17,425.80
453,070.80 92,937.60 -
1,936.20
1,936.20
Pounds at 50 mph 38.47
1,000.16 205.16 -
4.27
4.27
SCAQMD Threshold 75
550 100
150
(lbsJday)
Assumes 12,895 ADT. Based on California Air Resources Board's EMFAC7G Emissions Model. Assumes Year 2005
summertime running conditions at 75T, light duty autos, catalytic.
As demonstrated above, the proposed project will exceed SCAQMD's recommended
daily thresholds for both carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides. The potential impacts of the
proposed project were analysed in the General Plan EIR, as the land use proposed is less
than the previously approved medium density residential designation on the property. The
City found at that time that although the potential impacts associated with air quality in
the City could be considerable, the potential benefits of buildout of the General Plan
outweighed these potential impacts, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was
prepared and adopted in conjunction with the certification of the General Plan EIR. The
General Plan EIR included a number of mitigation measures to assist the City and project
developers in reducing potential impacts associated with air quality. In order to lower the
potential impacts associated with air quality emissions, mitigation measures have been
provided below.
The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (Particulates of
10 microns or less). The Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan adopted much stricter measures for the
control of dust both during the construction process and during project operations. These
measures will be integrated into conditions of approval for the proposed project. These
include the following control measures.
CONTROL
MEASURE
TITLE & CONTROL METHOD
BCM-1
Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities: Watering,
chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control
BCM-2
Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access
restriction, revegetation
BCM-3
Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical
stabilization, access restriction, revegetation
BCM-4
Paved Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road
shoulders, clean streets maintenance : i
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -9-
25
r
%��I�
The proposed project will generate dust during construction. Under mass grading
conditions, this could result in the generation of 24,658 pounds per day, for a limited
period while grading operations are active. The contractor will be required to submit a
PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity. In addition, the
potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the measures below.
1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize
exhaust emissions.
2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power
poles to avoid on -site power generation.
3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities.
4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site.
5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet
prior to the onset of grading activities.
6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on-
going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the
site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust
is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day.
7. Any area which remains undevelopedfor a period of more than 30 days shall be
stabilized using either chemical stabilizers or a desert wildflower mix
hydroseeded on the affected portion of the site.
8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for
wind erosion. Parkway landscaping on all perimeter streets (Avenue 58 & 60,
Madison and Monroe) shall be installed immediately following mass grading of
the site. The golf courses shall be landscaped immediately upon completion of
finished grading of the site. Whenever possible, portions of the golf course which
have been graded shall be seeded while other portions still under construction are
being completed.
9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -
related dirt on approach routes to the site.
10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone
episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour
11. The project proponent shall notify the City and SCAQMD of the start and end of
grading activities in conformance and within the time frames established in the
2002 PM10 Management Plan.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -10- J.
12. An air quality monitor shall be on site during all grading operations. The monitor
shall be empowered to implement the most stringent control measures, as
prescribed in the 2002 Coachella Valley PM10 Management Plan when necessary
to keep fugitive dust to a minimum.
13. All applicable mitigation measures contained in the General Plan EIR shall be
applied to the proposed project during both construction and operation.
III. d) & e) The development of the site will not subject people to significant pollutant
concentrations, nor will it create objectionable odors.
07
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -11- �;
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --
Would the project.
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
X
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Letter
report by LSA, October 10, 2003)
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
X
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by
the California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
(Letter report by LSA, October 10, 2003)
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
X
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means? (Letter report
by LSA, October 10, 2003)
d) Interfere substantially with the
X
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites? (Letter report
by LSA, October 10, 2003)
e) Conflict with any local policies or
X
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance? (Letter report by LSA,
October 10, 2003)
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
X
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -12- �� i
Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan? (Letter report by
LSA, October 10, 2003)
IV. a)-f) There are 587 acres of the proposed Specific Plan area which have previously been
surveyed for biological resources, and 355 acres which were surveyed for this project
application2.
The biological resource analysis completed for the additional acreage being incorporated
into the plan focused on the presence or absence of burrowing owl. The survey found no
evidence of burrowing owl on the property. The survey found the presence of fossorial
burrows adequate for occupation by burrowing owls. As such, the site, although not
currently occupied, includes appropriate habitat for the species. Since construction of the
proposed project will occur after the 30 day limitation placed on the current survey, the
following mitigation measure shall be implemented.
1. Within 30 days of the initiation of any ground disturbing activity on the site, the
project proponent shall cause the site to be surveyed for presence of burrowing
owl in the fossorial burrows located throughout the property. The surveys shall be
conducted according to the protocol in effect at the time. The survey results shall
be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of any grading permit on the site.
Should burrowing owl be identified on the site, a program of passive relocation
shall be implemented and documented prior to the issuance of any grading or
grubbing permit.
The site is located outside the boundary of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard
habitat conservation plan. No other conservation plans occur in the City.
2 "EIR for Coral Mountain Specific Plan" and associated addenda, certified by both the County of Riverside and the City of
La Quinta; and letter report prepared by LSA Associates, dated October 10, 2003. n
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -13-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would
the roject:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
X
the significance of a historical resource
as defined in Section 15064.5 ("Draft
Interim Archaeological Testing and Mitigation
Report," CRM Tech, November 2003.)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
X
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to '15064.5? ("Draft
Interim Archaeological Testing and Mitigation
Report," CRM Tech, November 2003.)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
X
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature? ("General Plan Exhibit 6.8)
d) Disturb any human remains, including
X
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries? ("Draft Interim Archaeological
Testing and Mitigation Report," CRM Tech,
November 2003.)
V. a), b) & d) Cultural resource surveys have previously been completed for the proposed project site'.
The 1998 survey included lands originally in the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, including
lands to the west of Madison Street and north of Avenue 60. The 2003 report included
testing and mitigation for lands between Madison Street and Monroe, including lands
which, had previously not been part of the Specific Plan areas. The 2003 report, which
included extensive investigation of four recorded sites, previously identified, were
excavated. The resulting curation and documentation of the sites, currently under way,
will complete the previously imposed mitigation measures for this portion of the Specific
Plan, with the exception of on -going monitoring, which should occur during all earth
moving activities, and is included in the mitigation measures below.
Areas to the west of Madison Street have been surveyed but not investigated, and
mitigation measures for those areas must still be implemented. These areas include
petroglyphs, artifacts and pottery sherds. The significant sites identified on the west side
of Madison Street in 1998 were: CA-RIV-37, CA-RIV-193 North, CA-RIV-193 South,
CA- and CA-RIV-6122. All these sites must be investigated, recorded and curated prior
to any activity in this area, in order to preserve an adequate record. Mitigation has been
included below.
3 "Cultural Resources Report Coral Mountain Project," and "Draft Interim Archaeological Testing and Mitigation
Report Coral Mountain Expansion," prepared by CRM Tech, September, 1998 and November 2003, respectively. 0 fl
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -14- Q
►i ♦,/
1. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading by
qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to
the City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit.
2. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
3. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the
property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and
records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
V. c) The site is outside the historic lakebed for ancient Lake Cahuilla, and is therefore not
expected to contain resources.
31.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -15- %_� U
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would
the project:
a) Expose people or structures to
X
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
X
as delineated on the most recent Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of
a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (MEA
X
Exhibit 6.2)
iii) Seismic -related ground failure,
X
including liquefaction? (General Plan
Exhibit 8.2)
iv) Landslides? (General Plan Exhibit 8.3)
X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or
X
the loss Of topsoil? (General Plan Exhibit 8.4)
c) Be located on expansive soil, as
X
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
(General Plan Exhibit 8.1)
d) Have soils incapable of adequately
X
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water? (General Plan
Exhibit 8.1)
VI. a) i), iii), iv),
b)-e) The project site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it
subject to landslides or liquefaction. Although the project will be connected to the sewer
system, the soil in the area is not expansive, and would support septic tanks. The
proposed project will have no impact on these geologic hazards.
32)
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -16- �.�'..t.
.v �
VI. a) ii) The City and project site will be subject to significant ground shaking in the event of
significant seismic activity. The City Building Department has implemented California
Building Code which is intended to lower the potential impacts associated with
groundshaking to less than significant levels. Residential and golf -related structures will
be required to implement the most recent building codes in place at the time of
construction. The City Engineer will require site -specific soil analysis for each phase of
development, to assure that the construction of the structures occurs on properly
excavated and compacted fill. These City standards will assure that the impacts associated
with seismic activity are reduced to a less than significant level.
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -17-
3
093
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VIE. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS --Would the ro ect:
a) Create a significant hazard to the
X
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials? (Application materials)
b) Create a significant hazard to the
X
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the
environment? (Application materials)
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
X
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one -quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school? (Application materials)
d) Be located on a site which is included
X
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
-create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment? (Riverside County
Hazardous Materials Listing)
e) For a project located within an airport
X
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in
the project area? (General Plan land use map)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
X
private airstrip, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? (General Plan
land use map)
g) Impair implementation of or
X
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
% 9
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -18-
evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff)
h) Expose people or structures to a
X
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas
or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands? (General Plan land use map)
VII. a)-h) The construction of residential, commercial and golf -related uses on the proposed project
site will not result in significant impacts associated with hazardous materials. The City
implements the standards of the Household Hazardous Waste programs in place through
its waste provider. The golf course will be regulated in its use and storage of fertilizers,
pesticides and cleaning products as well as the commercial sites by County agencies.
These regulations and standards ensure that impacts to surrounding areas, or within the
project itself, are less than significant.
rr-
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -19-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
UALITY -- Would the ro'ect:
a) Violate any water quality standards or
X
waste discharge requirements? (General
Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.)
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
X
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a
level which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)? (General Plan
EIR p. III-187 ff.)
c) Substantially alter the existing
X
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner
which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on- or off -site? (Specific Plan)
d) Substantially alter the existing
X
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off -site?
(Specific Plan)
e) Create or contribute runoff water
X
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff? (Specific Plan)
f) Place housing within a 100-year flood
X
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance
R
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -20-
Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map? (Master Environmental
Assessment Exhibit 6.6)
g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard
X
area structures which would impede or
redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental
Assessment Exhibit 6.6)
VIII. a) & b) Domestic water is supplied to the project site by the Coachella Valley Water District
(CVWD), which is required to prepare a water supply assessment for the proposed
project. The assessment will be based on the factors published by the CVWD for
different land uses, and the acreage involved, as shown in the table below.
Coachella Valley Water District
Annual Consumption by Development Tvpe
Development Type
Annual Consumption
Water Usage
(ac-ft/ac/yr)
Acres
Golf Course Developments
7.36
497
3,657.9
Residential
6.09
435
2,649.1
Commercial
4.81
10
48.1
Total
6,355.1
The CVWD has implemented or is implementing water conservation, purchase and
replenishment measures which, will result in a surplus of water in the long term. These
measures, combined with the measures imposed by the City and discussed below, assure
a long term water supply for the proposed project.
The project proponent will also be required to implement the City's water efficient
landscaping and construction provisions, which will ensure that the least amount of water
is utilized within the homes. The Coachella Valley Water District will impose conditions
of approval for the treatment of wastewater from the facilities constructed on the project
site. The applicant will also be required to comply with the City's NPDES standards,
requiring that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters. These City
standards will assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than
significant.
VIII. c) & d) The proposed project will be responsible for the drainage of on and off site flows, and has
been designed to include retention areas within the project. The City Engineer requires
that these retention areas retain the 100 year storm on site, and this will be accomplished
in the golf course and landscaped areas of the project. These City requirements are
expected to lower potential impacts to a less than significant level.
VIII. e)-g) The construction of the proposed project will not have an impact on the City's storm
drainage system. The site is not located within a FEMA designated 100 year storm area.
3'7
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -21- 4 t , ') --,
-. 4-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established
X
community? (Aerial photo)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
X
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general
plan, specific plan, local coastal program,
or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect? (General Plan Land
Use Element)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
X
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan? (Master Environmental
Assessment p. 74 ff.)
IX. a)-c) The proposed Specific Plan will result in the construction of residential units, golf course
facilities and commercial development consistent with surrounding development in the
area. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change lower the overall density of the
project to Low Density Residential, in keeping with surrounding designations. The
commercial component of the site is a smaller site.than the previously approved site and
will cause less impacts by proving a shopping area closer to the residents, thereby
reducing traffic trips. The proposed project will not conflict with General Plan
designations or policies, with exception of the Major Community Facility site. The
applicant is proposing to eliminate the Major Community Facility designation shown on
the General Plan Land Use Map on the north side of Avenue 60, between Madison Street
and Monroe Street. The applicant will have to demonstrate, from Riverside County Fire
Department, that a Fire Station is not required and that the closest station can serve the
project. Otherwise, the applicant will have to provide a one acre site for a future Fire
Station on the property. Overall, the project is expected to represent an extension of the
existing development in the area.
s
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -22- (� '}
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would
the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
X
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state? (Master Environmental Assessment
p. 71 ff.)
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
X
locally -important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment
p. 71 ff.)
X. a) & b) The proposed project site is within the MRZ-1 Zone, and is therefore not considered to
have potential for mineral resources.
39
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoraIEA Checklist.doc -23- J
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XI. NOISE Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation
X
of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards
of other agencies? (MEA p. 111 ff.)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation
X
of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? (Project
description)
c) A substantial permanent increase in
X
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project? (Project description)
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
X
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project? (General Plan land use
map)
e) For a project located within an airport
X
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? (General Plan land
use map)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
X
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels? (General
Plan land use map)
XI. a)-f) The proposed Specific Plan will include residential, golf course and commercial uses in a
master planned community, to be located away from area roadways. The individual
developments within the project will be required to submit evidence of compatibility with
noise standards in the City prior to issuance of building permits. Overall noise impacts to
the residents of the project area are expected to be less than significant.
40
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -24-
The project will generate higher noise levels during all phases of construction. This noise
generation, however, will occur during the less sensitive daytime hours, and entirely
within the master planned community. As phases of the residential development are built
and occupied, there is a potential for impacts when construction occurs adjacent to the
occupied portions of the site. In order to assure that impacts to the incremental increase in
occupied dwelling units and commercial sites is less than significant, the following
mitigation measures shall be implemented.
1. All construction activities shall occur during the hours prescribed in the La Quinta
Municipal Code.
2. All stationary equipment shall be placed as far away from existing residential
development as possible once construction begins on the project site.
3. All construction vehicles shall be equipped with well maintained and operative
mufflers.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -25-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING —
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth
X
in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses)
or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff.,
application materials)
b) Displace substantial numbers of
X
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application
materials)
c) Displace substantial numbers of
X
people, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? (General
Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials)
XII. a)-c) The proposed project will reduce the potential number of residential units on the project
site, by reducing the land use and zoning designations from Medium Density residential
to Low Density residential. The project site is currently vacant or in agriculture, and there
will be no displacement of housing as a result of the proposed project.
42
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -26-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XIH. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57)
x
Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57)
X
Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.)
X
Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks
X
Master Plan)
Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA,
X
p. 46 ff.)
XIII. a) Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The
proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City
contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate property tax which, will offset the
costs of added police and fire services. The project will be required to pay the mandated
school fees in place at the time of issuance of building permits. The proposed project
includes two golf courses and landscaped open space areas, which will provide internal
recreational opportunities for the residents and lower the potential impacts to City
facilities.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -27- l :
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant.
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XIV. RECREATION --
a) Would the project increase the use of
X
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
(Application materials)
b) Does the project include recreational
X
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment? (Application materials)
XIV. a) & b) The proposed project includes two golf courses, a swim and tennis club and landscaped
open space areas with walkways and trails, which will provide recreational opportunities
for the residents and lower the potential impacts to City facilities.
44
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -28-
4 ;_. .
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC --
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is
X
substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street
system (i.e., result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle
trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
(General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.)
b) Exceed, either individually or
X
cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads
or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.)
c) Result in a change in air traffic
X
patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks? (No air
traffic involved in project)
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
X
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Project
description)
e) Result in inadequate emergency
X
access? (Project description)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
X
(Project description)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans,
X
or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)? (Project description)
45
t
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -29- 4 t�
XV. a)-g) The proposed project site has been studied extensively for traffic impacts 4. As stated in
the Air Quality section above, the maximum potential number of daily trips which could
be generated by the project is 19,362, and the actual total is likely to be up to 25% less.
The location and sizing of roadways established in the General Plan included the
proposed project, as it had been approved prior to its adoption.
The roadways in the area are predicted to operate within acceptable parameters at
buildout of the General Plan. Access points to and from the site will be controlled, and
limited along Madison, Avenues 58 and 60, and Monroe. Specifically, access will be
limited to two primary access points on Madison, a secondary access point on Monroe,
and one access point each on Avenue 58 and Madison for the neighborhood commercial
properties. Additional service entrances are proposed on Avenue 60, Madison and
Avenue 58, but will not be open to the public.
Individual project proposals will be evaluated to assure that accesses and turning
movements are adequate to ensure safe circulation from the project onto City roadways.
All City roadways will be constructed to General Plan standards. Access from the
commercial parcels will be limited, and required to meet the City Engineer's standards.
Limited turning movements and restricted access have both been implemented by the City
Engineer to reduce potential impacts to public roadways.
4 "EIR for Coral Mountain Specific Plan" and associated addenda, certified by both the County of Riverside and the City of
La Quinta.
46
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -30- i y
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS B Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
X
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board? (General
Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
b) Require or result in the construction of
X
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
c) Require or result in the construction of
X
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
d) Have sufficient water supplies
X
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements
needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
e) Result in a determination by the
X
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
X
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
X
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
47
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -31- 4 0
XVI. a)-g) Utilities are available at the project site. The land uses considered in the General Plan
resulted in a higher density, and these were found to result in adequate levels of service. It
is therefore expected that the less intense development of the proposed project will lower
potential impacts to utility providers for the project site.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE --
a) Does the project have the potential to
X
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to
X
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long-term environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are
X
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
d) Does the project have environmental
X
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
XVII. a) The site will be surveyed to assure that no burrowing owl occur prior to construction. The
site has been identified as having significant cultural resources. However, mitigation
measures included above will assure that these potential resources. are protected, and that
potential impacts are reduced to less than significant levels.
4Si3
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -32-
XVII.b) The proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a
variety of housing and recreational opportunities for City residents. The reduction in
density resulting from the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will result in a
parallel reduction in long term impacts to the City's infrastructure and services.
XVII. c) The project will not have considerable cumulative impacts, and will reduce those impacts
identified in the General Plan EIR for this area of the City, or the City as a whole.
XVII. d) The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect human beings, due to air quality
and noise impacts. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non -attainment area for PM10, and
the site will generate a high level of criteria pollutants, which can cause negative health
effects, Section III), above, includes a number of mitigation measures to reduce the
potential impacts on air quality. The impacts are not expected to be any more than those
identified in the General Plan EIR, which included analysis of more intense development
at the project site. Noise impacts are those associated with construction, and have been
mitigated above to less than significant levels.
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
"EIR for Coral Mountain Specific Plan" and associated addenda, certified by both the County of
Riverside and the City of La Quinta.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
Not applicable.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
Not applicable.
49
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralEA Checklist.doc -33-
�1
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(MDR) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) AND GOLF
COURSE (G) DESIGNATION, AND MIXED/REGIONAL
COMMERCIAL (M/RC) TO NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL (NC), AND TO ELIMINATE THE MAJOR
COMMUNITY FACILITY (MC) DESIGNATION
CASE NO.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-093
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 16th day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
a General Plan Amendment to change land use designations from Medium Density
Residential to Low Density Residential, and Golf Course (G) designation, and
Mixed/Regional Commercial (M/RC) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and to
eliminate the Major Community Facility (MC) designation, for land generally located
at the northwest corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe Street, more particularly
described as follows:
APNs: 764-200-001 thru 007; 764-210-001 thru 006
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 25" day, of November, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public
Hearing to recommend to the City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment
to change land use designations from Medium Density Residential to Low Density
Residential, and Golf Course (G) designation, and Mixed/Regional Commercial
(M/RC) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and to eliminate the Major Community
Facility (MC) designation, for land generally located at the northwest corner of
Avenue 60 and Monroe Street; and
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in
that the Community Development Department has prepared Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 and has determined that although the proposed project
could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less than
significant levels, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impact is recommended for certification; and,
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoGPA.doc
5
City Council Resolution 2003-
General Plan Amendment 2003-093
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
WHEREAS, at. said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings to approve said General
Plan Amendment:
1. General Plan Consistency: The proposed Amendment is consistent with the
goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan in that the Amendment will
continue to provide for single-family homes, golf course and commercial
development.
2. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed Amendment will not create
conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in
that the proposed changes will be less intensive and consistent with existing
land uses.
3. General' Plan Compatibility: The proposed project will be compatible with
existing and surrounding land uses in that the Amendment will continue to
provide for single-family, golf course and commercial development adjacent to
other developments.
4. Property Suitability: The proposed project will be suitable and appropriate in
that it will provide land uses compatible to the area, include public streets as
required by the Circulation Element, and urban services are currently
accessible to the site which, would allow for planned development in
accordance with goals, objectives and policies of the City of La Quinta General
Plan.
5. Change in Circumstances: Approval of the proposed project is warranted
because the land has been determined to be suitable for residential and golf
course development and commercial uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings 'of
the City Council; and
2. That it does hereby approve General Plan Amendment 2003-093, as contained
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of, for the reasons set forth in
this Resolution.
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoGPA.doc
416
City Council Resolution 2003-
General Plan Amendment 2003-093
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of La Quinta City Council, held on this 16" day of December, 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoGPA.doc
569W
Proposed Use
General Plan / !A
proposed Land Use
Low Density Residential — LDR
Nei&borhood.C.omme1cial — NC
Golf - G
53
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE
CHANGE TO CHANGE ZONING DESIGNATIONS FROM
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RM) TO LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (RL) AND GOLF COURSE (GC),
MIXED/REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (M/RC) TO
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN), AND TO
ELIMINATE THE MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITY (MC)
DESIGNATION
CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2003-116
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 161h day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
a Zone Change to change zoning designations from Medium Density Residential to
Low Density Residential, and Golf Course (GC), Mixed/Regional Commercial (M/RC)
to Neighborhood Commercial (CN), and to eliminate the Major Community Facility
(MC) designation, for land generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue 60
and Monroe Street, more particularly described as follows:
APNs: 764-200-001 thru 007; 764-210-001 thru 006
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 25' day of November, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public
Hearing to recommending approval. said Zone Change to change; and,
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in
that the Community Development Department has prepared Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 and has determined that although the proposed project
could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less, than
significant levels, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impact is recommended for certification; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings to approve said Zone
Change:
54
SACity C1erk\0rdinances\Cora10rdZC116E.doc
1 `1
Ordinance No.
Zone Change 2003-1 16
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
1. Consistency with the General Plan: The proposed Zone Change is consistent
with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan in that the Zone
Change will continue to provide single-family, golf course and commercial
development uses.
2. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed Zone Change will not create
conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in
that the proposed changes are less intense and consistent with the immediate
area.
3. Land Use Compatibility: The new zoning will be compatible with existing and
surrounding zoning designations in that it will be consistent with development
in the immediate area and the City of La Quinta General Plan.
4. Property Suitability: The new zoning will be suitable and appropriate for the
subject property in that it will be consistent with the permitted uses in the
immediate area and in accordance with the Zoning Code. Urban services are
currently accessible to the area, which would allow for planned development
in accordance with goals, objectives and policies of the City of La Quinta
Zoning Code and General Plan.
5. Change in Circumstances: Approval of the new zoning is warranted because
the land has been determined to be suitable for residential, commercial and
recreational development. The change in zoning is also warranted because
similar uses currently exist north and south of the project site.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of the General Plan in that the Zone Change will continue to
provide single-family, golf course and commercial development adjacent to existing
developments; and
SECTION 2. That the La Quinta Zoning Map be amended as contained
in the attached Exhibit "A"; and
SECTION 3. Environmental Determination. This Ordinance has
compiled with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970" in that the Community Development
Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2003-483 and has
SACity C1erk\0rdinances\Cora10rdZC116E.doc
.3. 55 ,7
4�
Ordinance No.
Zone Change 2003-1 16
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
determined that although the proposed project could have a significant adverse
impact on the environment, mitigation measures have been imposed on the project
that would reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and therefore, a Mitigated
Negative Declaration of environmental impact is recommended for certification.
SECTION 4. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of La Quinta City Council, held on this 161h day of December, 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
SACity C1erk\0rdinances\Cora10rdZC116E.doc
Proposed Zoning
Zoning chwismtions
Low Density Residential — RL
Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
Golf Course . GC
57
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE
CANCELLATION OF LAND CONSERVATION
(WILLIAMSON ACT) CONTRACT FOR ± 195 ACRES FOR
COACHELLA VALLEY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE
NO. 58
CASE NO.: AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE 2003-001
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 161h day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
an Agricultural Preserve application to tentatively cancel a Land Conservation
(Williamson Act) contract for ± 195 acres for Coachella Valley Preserve No. 58,
generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe Street, more
particularly described as follows:
APNs: 764-200-007, 764-210-004 and 764-210-005
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in
that the Community Development Department has . prepared Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 and has determined that although the proposed project
could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less than
significant levels, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impact is recommended for certification; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings to approve the tentative
cancellation of said Land Conservation (Williamson Act) contract for ± 195 acres
for Coachella Valley Preserve No. 58:
1. A Notice of Non -Renewal has been served: A Notice of Non -Renewal was
served on the County on or about February 26, 1999, and recorded on July
7, 1999.
2. Cancellation is not likely to result in removing adjacent lands from
agricultural use: There are no adjacent lands which are not currently zoned
residential or commercial.
CC RESO AP 03-001 58
4�"W)3
City Council Resolution 2003-
Agricultural Preserve 2003-001
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
3. Cancellation is for an alternative use which is consistent with the City's
General Plan: The subject property is zoned of LDR (Low Density
Residential) under the City of La Quinta General Plan.
Cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development.
Documents approved in connection with Annexation #13 have resulted in
General Plan and Zoning designations for the subject and surrounding
properties which are consistent with Petitioner's plans for residential and golf
development. Cancellation of the Contract and use of the Property in
accordance with such plans will result in uniform, consistent and contiguous
patterns of development. On the other hand, continuation of the Contract
would result in discontiguous patterns of urban development in that
maintenance of the Property in agricultural use would create an island in the
middle of residential growth and development.
4. There is no proximate non -contracted land which is both available and
suitable for the proposed use of the contracted land, or, that development of
the contracted land would provide more contiguous patterns of urban
development than development of proximate non -contracted land: The
Petitioner's plan to add the majority of the 816 acres covered by Annexation
#13 (including the subject Property) to Specific Plan 03-067, and develop
same in a similar manner, i.e., for residential and golf course purposes, there
is no proximate non -contracted land which is sufficiently close that it can
serve as a practical alternative, nor is there any such land which is suitable
for the proposed use in that any such land would result in bifurcation of the
proposed development.
Petitioner submits that development of the subject Property would provide
more contiguous patterns of urban development than development of any
potential (and probably non-existent) proximate non -contracted land. The
subject property is essentially located in the center of 1,677 acres of land
already entitled for residential and golf uses. Consisting of ± 190 acres, the
subject Williamson Act Property comprises less than 12% of the 1,677 acre
total. Development of the subject Property in a manner compatible with (and
as part of) surrounding Specific Plan 03-067 approved uses would serve as a
natural and logical extension of existing land use planning concepts and
patterns.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
w r L al Settin s Tem orar Internet Files\OLK7\CC RESO AP 03-001.doc '-' A
C:\Documents and Settings\bsa ye \ oc g \ p y [ � It
City Council Resolution 2003-
Agricultural Preserve 2003-001
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council; and
2. That it does hereby approve to tentative cancellation of a Land Conservation
(Williamson Act) contract for t 195 acres for Coachella Valley Preserve No.
58, as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of, for the
reasons set forth in this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of La Quinta City Council, held on this 161h day of December, 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
E0
C:\Documents and Settingsftawyer\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\0LK7\CC RESO AP 03-001.doc
EXIHIBT A
L
kf CBMwd#
j{{
1
C&PUv Par
r•
fad .2�=
-----------
No. 58
I ,
*"a Valley No. 58
76524-210-Q05
�9 Av. -S5 �...
TORRES* DdART IrtE2
i a.. U
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR A SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW TWO 18-HOLE GOLF
COURSES, ASSOCIATED FACILITIES AND 1,400 RESIDENTIAL
UNITS RANGING IN SIZE FROM ± 3,150 TO ± 3,650 SQUARE FEET
ON ± 942 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER, OF
AVENUE 60 AND MONROE STREET
CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 2003-067
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 16" day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
development principles and design guidelines to allow two 18-hole golf courses, a
16,400 square foot golf clubhouse, 4,000 square foot swim & tennis facility, 400
square foot gatehouse, 14,000 square foot maintenance building, and, 1,400
attached and detached residential model units ranging in size from ± 3,150 square
feet to ± 3,650 square feet, generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue
60 and Monroe Street, more particularly described as follows:
APNs: 764-200-001 thru 007; 764-210-001 thru 006
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 251h day of November, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public
Hearing to recommend to the City Council approval of development principles and
design guidelines to allow two 18-hole golf courses, 16,400 square foot golf
clubhouse, 4,000 square foot swim & tennis facility, 400 square foot gatehouse,
14,000 square foot maintenance building, and, 1,400 attached and detached
residential model units ranging in size from ± 3,150 square feet to ± 3,650 square
feet, generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe Street;
and,
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in
that the Community Development Department has prepared Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 and has determined that although the proposed project
could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less than
significant levels, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impact is recommended for certification; and,
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP.doc V 2
i
City Council Resolution 2003-
Specific Plan 2003-067
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section
9.240.010 of the Zoning Code to approve said Specific Plan:
1. Consistency with the General Plan: The proposed project is consistent with the
goals and policies of the General Plan in that the design, height, scale and
mass of the project is compatible with the land use designations in the General
Plan.
2. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed project will not create conditions
materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in that the
proposed project is consistent with the project's Specific Plan.
3. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed project is compatible in terms of land
uses, in that it is consistent with the type of development allowed under the
City's General Plan designations.
4. Property Suitability: The proposed project is suitable and appropriate for the
subject property in that the site is zoned for residential, golf course and
commercial uses in accordance with the Specific Plan, Zoning Code, and the
goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council for this Specific Plan;
2. That it does hereby approve Specific Plan 2003-067 for the reasons set forth
in this Resolution, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto;
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council held on this 16t' day of December, 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP.doc
63
City Council Resolution 2003-
Specific Plan 2003-067
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP.doc
14 r ,
ti _
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
GENERAL
1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La
Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or
proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative
Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole
discretion in selecting its defense counsel.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or
proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense.
2. This Specific Plan, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with
the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through
66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta
Municipal Code ("LQMC").
The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web
Site at www.la-quinta.org.
3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the
City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from
the following agencies:
• Fire Marshal
• Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit)
• Community Development Department
• Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department
• Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD)
0 Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)
• Imperial Irrigation District (IID)
• California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB)
• SunLine Transit Agency
The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or
clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include
approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such
approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval.
_ EJ
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 1 `�
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES
stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater
Management and Discharge Controls) and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean
Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water
Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ.
A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of
land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less
than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project
that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall
be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan
("SWPPP").
B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project.
C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for
inspection at the project site at all times through and including
acceptance of all improvements by the City.
D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following
Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC):
1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control).
2) Temporary Sediment Control.
3) Wind Erosion Control.
4) Tracking Control.
5) Non -Storm Water Management.
6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control.
E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall
be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading,
pursuant to this project.
F. The approved SWPPP and BMP's shall remain in effect for the entire
duration of project construction until all improvements are completed
and accepted by the City. 6�
(1 -�
%J AL
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 2
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the
Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at
the time of issuance of building permit(s).
PROPERTY RIGHTS
6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer
easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper
functioning of the proposed. development. Conferred rights shall include
irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for
emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of
essential improvements.
7. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street
right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code,
applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer.
8. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this
development include:
A. PUBLIC STREETS
1) Monroe Street (General Plan Primary Arterial, Option A, 1 10'
ROW) - Sufficient right of . way shall be dedicated to
accommodate the standard 55 feet from the centerline of
Monroe Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right of
way except for an additional right of way dedication to
accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS.
2) Madison Street pursuant to Specific Plan 218, Amendment No.
1 (Primary Arterial , Option A*, 1 10' ROW) - The standard
110-foot ultimate developed right of way shall be dedicated
except for an additional right of way dedication to
accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS.
3) Avenue 58 (Proposed General Plan Secondary
ROW) - If a proposed General Plan Amendment
the City Council, sufficient right of way shall b
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc
e
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION 1, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
accommodate the proposed standard 47-foot right of way from
the centerline of Avenue 58 to comply with the existing
Secondary Arterial Roadway Classification plus a Class II
bicycle. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to
accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS.
4) Avenue 60 (Proposed General Plan Secondary Arterial, 96'
ROW) — If a proposed General Plan Amendment is adopted by
the City Council, sufficient right of way shall be dedicated to
accommodate the proposed standard 47-foot right of way from
the centerline of Avenue 58 to comply with the existing
Secondary Arterial Roadway Classification plus a Class II
bicycle. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to
accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS.
Note: *Equivalent to County of Riverside Arterial Highway Roadway Classification
9. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street
right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code,
applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer.
10. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for
this development include:
A. PRIVATE STREETS
Property line shall be placed at the back of curb similar the typical
street section. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at
property lines is recommended.
Private Residential Streets measured gutter flow line to gutter flow
line: 36-foot travel width where parking is allowed on both sides and
28 feet if on -street parking is prohibited, and provided there is
adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant
establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking
restriction in the CC&R's. The CC&R's shall be reviewed by the
Engineering Department prior to recordation.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc
4
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
11. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right
and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features.
12. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street
right-of-ways shown on the Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to
approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall
grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the
City.
13. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map, when submitted, a
ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides
of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width
with the express written approval of IID.
14. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public
right-of-ways as follows:
A. Monroe Street - (General Plan Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the
R/W-P/L.
B. Madison Street - (Pursuant to Specific Plan 218, Amendment No. 1 -
Primary Arterial, Option A) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L.
C. Avenue 58 - and Avenue 60 (General Plan Secondary Arterial) - 10-
foot from the R/W-P/L.
The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall
design is approved.
The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not
limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes.
Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned
setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those
purposes on the Final Map, when submitted.
15. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the
placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins,
69
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 5 4 `/ 4
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map, when
submitted.
16. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Monroe Street, Avenue 58 and
Avenue 60 from lots with frontage along those respective facilities is
restricted, except for those access points identified on the Specific Plan, or
as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular
access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map, when
submitted. Vehicular access shall meet requirements and/or restrictions per
the La Quinta General Plan for the roadway classification listed in Condition
8.
17. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as
appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading,
retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will
occur.
18. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any
portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative
Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement
is approved by the City Engineer.
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as
"engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or
licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California.
19. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of
qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with
the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC.
20. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review
and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified
below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified,
unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be
prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note,
the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed
here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility
purveyors.
70
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 6 ; `� J
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
A. Off -Site Street/Signing & Striping/Drainage Plans: 1 " = 40' Horizontal,
1 " = 40' Vertical
The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control
and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the
meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined
parkway and landscape setback area.
B. On -Site Street/Drainage Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 40' Vertical
C. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal
Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not
listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior
to commencing plan preparation.
All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall
show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond
the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design
transitions.
"Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top of
Wall & Top of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum
of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions.
21. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes
for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the
applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or
construction notes from the City.
22. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all
approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City
Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they
may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program.
At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the
improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in
order to reflect the as -built conditions.
Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD
format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the
City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans.
i
S:\City Cie rk\Resolutions\CoraIResoSP-COA.doc 7 �
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS
23. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and
off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a
fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA")
guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of
its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be
required by the City.
24. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and
between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, -for the purpose of
guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to any Tentative
Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement
Security), LQMC, when submitted.
25. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal
of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the
proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey
monumentation.
26. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development,
or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the
City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final
building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of
the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements.
GRADING
27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050
(Grading Improvements), LQMC.
28. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other
purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City
Engineer.
29. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain
approval of all of the following:
A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect,
72
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 8 j v
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified
engineer,
C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter
6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC, and
D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with
Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge
permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC.
All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the
Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils
engineer, or by an engineering geologist.
A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been
prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953.
The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in
an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive
Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading
permit.
30. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to
prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded,
undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or
stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the
Fugitive Dust Control Plan.
31. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have
undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section
9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement.
The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback
area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape
lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The
maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed
4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six (6) of the curb,
otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1.
All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and
one-half inches 0.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb.
SACity Cie rk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 9 �!
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
32. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City
Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the
tentative map, when submitted, unless the pad elevations have other
requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval.
33. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one
foot from the building pads in adjacent developments.
DRAINAGE
34. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120
(Drainage), LQMC.
35. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and
drainage report prepared specifically for Specific Plan 2003-067. The
tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public
streets.
36. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments,
nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field or
equivalent system approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach
field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of
landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft.
37. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water
(through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or
adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as
a requirement for. development of this property.
38. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood
boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development.
39. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received
and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief
route.
UTILITIES
40. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location
of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility
structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults,
74
S:\CitY Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 10 11 v �J
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for
practical and aesthetic purposes.
41. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed
development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground.
42. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles
are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground.
43. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For
installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply
with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City
Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench
compaction for approval by the City Engineer.
STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
44. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street
Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access
For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and
Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets
are proposed.
45. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform
with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses.
A. OFF -SITE STREETS
1) Monroe Street (General Plan Primary Arterial, Option A, 1 10'
ROW) :
Widen the west side of the street along all frontage adjacent to
the Specific Plan boundary to its ultimate width on the east side
as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these
conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway
pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural
county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design
standard. The west curb face shall be located forty three feet
(43') west of the centerline, except at locations where
additional street width is needed to accommodate:
75
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit)
b) A deceleration/right turn only lane at the Primary Entry. The
west curb face shall be located fifty one feet (51') west of
the centerline.
Other required improvements in the right or way and/or adjacent
landscape setback area include:
a) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to:
curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs.
b) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering
sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that
utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the
curb line that either touches the back of curb or
approaches within five feet of the curb at intervals not to
exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should
vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of
reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in
creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall
meander into the landscape setback lot and approach
within 5 feet. of the perimeter wall at intervals not to
exceed. 250 feet.
2) Madison Street pursuant to Specific Plan 218, Amendment No.
1, Primary Arterial, Option A*, 1 10' ROW:
No additional street widening is required except at locations
where additional street width is needed to accommodate:
a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit)
b) A deceleration/right turn only lane at the West Side
Development Primary Entry. The curb face shall be
located fifty one feet (51') west of the centerline.
c) A deceleration/right turn only lane at the East Side
Development Primary Entry. The curb face shall be
located fifty one feet (51') east of the centerline.
76
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 12 tit -r-
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
Other required improvements in the right or way and/or adjacent
landscape setback area include:
a) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to:
curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs.
b) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk along the east side of
Madison Street. The meandering sidewalk shall have an
arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and
convex curves with respect to the curb line that either
touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet
of the curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The
sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300
feet, and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius
should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout.
The sidewalk shall meander into the landscape setback
lot and approach within 5 feet of the perimeter wall at
intervals not to exceed 250 feet.
c) MULTI -USE TRAIL - The applicant shall construct a 10'
wide, multi -use trail with split rail fence along the west
side of Monroe Street within the required landscape
setback. The location and design of the trail shall be per
the approved City of La Quinta Standard Plan. The multi-
use trail, trail signs, and the split rail fence shall be
completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be
installed shall be posted prior to final map approval.
3) Avenue 58 (Proposed General Plan Secondary Arterial, 96'
ROW) - If a proposed General Plan Amendment is adopted by
the City Council, widen the south side of the street along all
frontage adjacent to the Specific Plan boundary to its ultimate
width as specified in the Proposed General Plan Amendment
and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or
reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to
augment and convert it from a rural county -road design
standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The
south curb face shall be located thirty six feet (36') south of the
centerline, except at locations where additional street width is
needed to accommodate:
77
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 13 qq
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit)
Other required improvements in the right or way and/or adjacent
landscape setback area include:
b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to:
curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs.
4) Avenue 60 (Proposed General Plan Secondary Arterial, 96'
ROW) — If a proposed General Plan Amendment is adopted by
the City Council, widen the south side of the street along all
frontage adjacent to the Specific Plan boundary to its ultimate
width on the south side as specified in the Proposed General
Plan Amendment and the requirements of these conditions.
Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as
necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road
design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard.
The north curb face shall be located thirty six feet (36') north of
the centerline, except at locations where additional street width
is needed to accommodate:
a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit)
Other required improvements in the right or way and/or adjacent
landscape setback area include:
b. All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to:
curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs.
C. 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering
sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that
utilizes concave and -convex curves with respect to the
curb line that touches the back of curb at intervals not to
exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should
vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of
reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in
creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall
meander into the landscape setback lot and approach
within 5 feet of the perimeter wall at intervals not to
exceed 250 feet.
78
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 14 444,13
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries
to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading;
traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions
of streets and sidewalks).
46. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the
following:
A. Monroe Street
1) Primary Entry (Monroe Street, The applicant shall align the
access with the existing access on the east side of Monroe
Street. Full turning movements are permitted.
B. Madison Street
1) Primary Entry, West Development - Shall be located at least
1,060 feet (measured curb return to curb return) from Calle
Conchita to the south and from the East Development Primary
Entry to the north: Full turn movements are permitted.
2) Primary Entry, East Development - Shall be located at least 1,
060 feet (measured curb return to curb return) from Avenue 58
to the north and from the West Development Primary Entry to
the south: Full turn movements are permitted.
3) West Commercial Development - Right turn movements in and
out are permitted. Left turn in movement is permitted. Left turn
out movement is not permitted.
4) East Commercial Development - Right turn movements in and
out are permitted. Left turn movements in and out are not
permitted.
C. Avenue 58
1) West Commercial Development - All turn movements are
permitted.
79
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 15
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
2) East Commercial Development - All turn movements are
permitted.
All service entries shall be right turn in and out movements only.
47. All residential gated entries shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking
capacity for inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for
non -accepted vehicles.
Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit
at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do
not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn -around out
onto the main street from the gated entry.
Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry,
one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors.
Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner
cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on
the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may
be determined by the City Engineer.
48. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design
procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil
strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic).
Minimum structural sections shall be as follows:
Residential
Secondary Arterial
Primary Arterial
3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b.
4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b.
4.5" a.c./6.0" c.a.b.
or, the approved equivalents of alternate materials.
49. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at
the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement
concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in
the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal
shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction)
aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be
M
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 16
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction
operations until mix designs are approved.
50. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs,
markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs
and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required.
51. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City
adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as
approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates
and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers.
CONSTRUCTION
52. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the
buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -
maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control
devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in
residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement
thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final
inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when
directed by the City, whichever comes first.
LANDSCAPING
53. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks)
& 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC.
54. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention
basins, common lots and park areas.
55. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians,
retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed
landscape architect.
56. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the
Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the
Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD,
the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County
Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City
Engineer.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 17
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City
Engineer.
57. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the
requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized
with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs
along public streets.
PUBLIC SERVICES
58. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by
SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
59. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that
meet with the approval of the City Engineer.
60. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and
such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise
with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide
adequate construction supervision.
61. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements,
sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection
program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the
construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans,
specifications and other applicable regulations.
62. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with
reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved
by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -
Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer
or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings.
The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously
submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions.
MAINTENANCE
63. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160
(Maintenance), LQMC. 82
S:\City Cie rk\Resolutions\CoraIResoSP-COA.doc 18
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
64. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual
maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping,
access drives, and sidewalks.
FEES AND DEPOSITS
65. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees
and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by
the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee
amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for
plan check and permits.
66. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the
Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at
the time of issuance of building permit(s).
COMMUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
67. The applicant shall furnish proof from the Riverside County Fire Department
that a fire station is no longer needed on the site. In the event that the need
for a fire station is determined by Riverside County Fire Department, the
applicant shall provide to Riverside County Fire Department a one (1) acre
parcel of land within, or in the general vicinity of, the Specific Plan area and
acceptable to both the applicant and Riverside County Fire Department.
68. The applicant shall submit a Tentative Tract Map to reflect the Specific Plan
and Site Development Permit at a future date to be processed in accordance
with the Subdivision Map Act prior to issuance of Building permits.
69. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program
associated with the project.
70. The applicant shall meet all Coachella Valley Water District requirements to
provide adequate water and sewer services to the site.
71. The applicant shall pay all development impacts fees and school fees
associated with the project prior to the issuance of building permits.
72. The applicant shall be restricted to use "Pine" trees within the golf course
area only.
S:\City Cie rk\Resolutions\CoraIResoSP-00A.doc 19
mo
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
73. The site shall be monitored during on- and off -site trenching and rough
grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors
shall be given to the City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing
permit.
74. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
75. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for
the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field
notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSP-COA.doc 20 49
'4_ .
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
PLANS TO ALLOW TWO 18-HOLE GOLF COURSES,
ASSOCIATED FACILITIES AND 1,400 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
RANGING IN SIZE FROM ± 3,150 TO ± 3,650 SQUARE
FEET ON ± 942 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF AVENUE 60 AND MONROE STREET
CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-787
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on
the 161h day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
development plans to allow two 18-hole golf courses, a 16,400 square foot golf
clubhouse, 4,000 square foot swim & tennis facility, 400 square foot gatehouse,
14,000 square foot maintenance building, and, 1,400 attached and detached
residential model units ranging in size from ± 3,150 square feet to ± 3,650 square
feet, generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe Street, more
particularly described as follows:
APNs: 764-200-001 thru 007; 764-210-001 thru 006
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California,
did, on the 25' day of November,, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to
recommend approval to the City Council of development plans to allow two 18-hole
golf courses, a 16,400 square foot golf clubhouse, 4,000 square foot swim & tennis
facility, 400 square foot gatehouse, 14,000 square foot maintenance building, and,
1,400 attached and detached residential model units ranging in size from ± 3,150
square feet to ± 3,650 square feet, generally located at the northwest corner of
Avenue 60 and Monroe Street; and,
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that
the Community Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment
2003-483 and has determined that although the proposed project could have a
significant adverse impact on the environment, mitigation measures have been
imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and
therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact is recommended
for certification; and,
85
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSDP.doc _
City Council Resolution 2003-
Site Development Permit 2003-787
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010
of the Zoning Code to approve said Site Development Permit:
1. Consistency with the General Plan: The project as proposed is consistent with
the goals and policies of the General Plan in that residential, golf courses and
commercial uses are allowed under the designated land use designations.
2. Consistency with the Zoning Code: The proposed project is consistent with the
zoning districts in that the project meets the development standards including,
but not limited to, setbacks, architecture, building heights, building mass,
exterior lighting, parking, circulation, open space and landscaping.
3. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The proposed
project complies with the requirements of CEQA in that Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 was prepared for this project with imposed mitigation
measures to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. A Mitigated
Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was certified.
4. Architectural Design: The architectural design of the proposed buildings,
including, but not limited to, architectural style, scale, building mass, materials,
colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements, are
compatible with surrounding development and quality of design prevalent in the
City. The proposed buildings lack the bulky mass of a building due to the
articulation, desert tone colors and different pitched tile roofs. The proposed
buildings are adequately set back with multiple wall planes so as to minimize the
appearance of a large structural mass.
5. Site Design: The site design of the proposed project, including but not limited
to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian access, pedestrian amenities,
screening of equipment, trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design
elements such as scale, mass, appearance, and amount of landscaping are
compatible with the quality of design prevalent in the City in that the proposed
project meets the development standards of the Site Development Permit.
6. Landscape Design: The landscaping for the proposed project, including but not
limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant
materials, has been designed to provide visual relief, complement the buildings,
SACity Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSDP.doc a
vi
City Council Resolution 03-
Site Development Permit 2003-787
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the
project. The proposed landscaping is compatible with the surrounding area in
that the variety of drought tolerant plants, trees and shrubs, provide an
aesthetically pleasing and well functioning use of landscaping space.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La
Quinta, California, as follows:
1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the
City Council for this Site Development Permit;
2. That it does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2003-787 for the reasons
set forth in this Resolution and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached
hereto;
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta
City Council held on this 16" day of December 2003, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California ` ` 87
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\CoralResoSDP.doc
. , r)
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 03-787
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
GENERAL
1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City
of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any
claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the
approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded
thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense
counsel.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or
proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense.
2. This approved Site Development Permit (SDP 03-787) shall be in
conformance with the approved exhibits contained in Specific Plan
2003-067 unless otherwise amended by the following conditions.
3. This Site Development Permit (SDP 2003-787) shall be binding with
the Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan 03-067. This includes,
but is not limited to, any property rights, street and traffic
improvement plans, grading, drainage, utilities, parking lots, access
points, construction, public services, landscaping, quality assurance,
maintenance, fees and deposits.
4. Final front yard landscaping plans shall be prepared by a licensed
landscape architect and submitted to the Community Development
Department for review and approval prior to issuance of any building
permit for units authorized, by this approval in compliance with
Chapter 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscaping) of the Municipal Code.
The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Coachella
Valley Water District and Riverside County Agriculture Commissioner
prior to submittal of the final plans to the Community Development
Department.
a. Front yard landscaping shall consist of two trees (i.e., a minimum
1.5 inch caliper measured three feet up from grade level after
planting), ten 5-gallon shrubs, and groundcover. Palm trees may
count as a shade tree if the trunk is six feet tall. Double lodge
poles (two-inch diameter) shall be used to stake trees. All shrubs
88
P:\Martin\SDP 03 787 Coral Option I\SDP 03 787 CC COA.doc n
and trees shall. be irrigated by bubbler or emitters. To encourage
water conservation, no more than 50% of the front yard
landscaping shall be devoted to turf. Future home buyers shall be
offered an option to have no turf areas in their front yard through
the use of desertscape materials.
b. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray
irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of street curbs.
c. Once the trees have been delivered to the site for installation, a
field inspection by the Community Development Department is
required before planting to insure they meet minimum size and
caliper requirements.
89
P:\Martin\SDP 03 787 Coral Option I\SDP 03 787 CC COA.doc t ';
v
ATTACHMENT 1
#Woo,
� �ipli►l�1'iIVBJ.S
i
i
PAI.IiA DESEiff
i
osewo�we�
PROJECT SITE
90 �,
IT
44
MEN MENE■160032■■■■■al■■■■■� r ..
SEEN aN■■mom■■■■m■o■■■ore N■■■
■■■ MEMOIR )BONNONE■■■■■■■■■■■S
■■■■■�■
■■■■■■■ iw..
■�■■■■E ,,��� ,� �4�,�r�;� t� -:mac■ �°,� � � � _
'ANN��■ Cam..,.
i.;Srt
- np [.xy•rs wy
�u M°� b" as C j
9 1 b
ATTACHMENT 3
Proposed General flan / Land Use
proposed Land Use
Low Density Residential — LDR
Neighbborhood Commercial — NC
Golf - G
92
ATTACHMENT 4
Proposed Zoning
Zoning Chwif Cations
Low Density Residential — RL
Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
Golf Course GC
93
ATTACHMENT 5
t f p q 1 •p
h t i
Wncs11►m-meat l 1 f
s
I �
SVEiYUE AVENUE* . . SB
GoabWla Yal".o.
a
28 # 141 P4 ;�34-�200 �PW
59
' .s' fi �`• hella YaNey No. 58
ec
Att
Acto
e o�e�
. •� '4 e� rya
------ �- �., #�As YalWy No. 58
764-210-005 -
9 35
! 33 34 . A
- `
i — I ping of
Ste Lion
\
VA LLI AIM 50 N-, A
TORRES' DdARTINEZ
313 : G
94
ATTACHMENT 88
Planning Commission Minutes
November 25, 2003
E. Environmental Assessment 2003-483, General Plan Amendment 2003-
093, Zone Change 2003-116, Specific Plan 2003-067, and Site
Development Permit 2003-787; a request of Coral Option 1 for
certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact;
General Plan Amendment Zone Change to change land uses and zoning
designations from Medium Density Residential to Low Density
Residential, Mixed/Regional Commercial to Neighk rhood Commercial and
relocate the Neighborhood Commercial Des i ons, add Golf Course
Designation, and eliminate the Major Corrty Facility Designation;
development principles and design gt `g �� for two 18-hole golf
courses, associated facilities and 1,4�eside units; development
ieu
plans for two 18-hole golf cour% associate i ilities and 1,400
residential units for the proper, �;*cated at the n yvest corner of
Avenue 60 and Monroe Street?
1. Chairman Kirk opened the wring and asked for the staff
WEN �
report. Associate Planner Mart r agana presented the information
I OMR
contained in ����ff report, anqu
►y of which is on file in the
S
Community Duo " Departm
4BE
2. Chairman Kirk a d if . x � here vany questions of staff.
ME
C r �ner Tyleabout requirement for an additional
�statio y , Staff st that for ever 4 000 homes a fire station
41 §,
needednlogy curffltly has 1,203 homes but, whenever it is
out ion ��€e needed and it would be addressed at
k , s
Y R
the VI.Plan Vla tiger Oscar Orci clarified that staff was
A.
E k 3 k
reque�h, the aPP lint obtain proof from the Fire Department
t a fI Ination will not be required. To date staff has not been
3 ,
a��
" reply by the Fire Department and therefore, the
to gel ,,;..
bur*"„lies e applicant to obtain such a statement. We have
indic#§d to the applicant that we would like to have the land
£ avail,.`e for a fire station there, but have left it up to the
di4,0 ion of the Fire Department.
3.;ommissioner Daniels stated it appears the City will be losing 122
acres of Medium Density zoning. Staff stated yes, but it is being
replaced with a similar single family homes land use designation.
Commissioner Daniels asked if we were losing our housing mix.
Staff stated no, there is a mix of single family as well as duplexes
contained in this project. Commissioner Daniels asked if Madison
Street is an Arterial and whether or not it would go through to
Highway 111. Staff stated it would go to Avenue 50, to the City
of Indio. 95
G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-25-03WD.doc 11
Planning Commission Minutes
November 25, 2003
►9
Commissioner Tyler stated the conditions should be changed to
reflect this project is within the Coachella Valley Unified School
District. He then stated that on page 75 and 76 of the staff report
it is not clear what the applicant would have to do if a General
Plan Amendment was not approved.sistant City Engineer
Steve Speer clarified that bike lanes not included in the
condition and need to be accommoc . The condition needs to
be rewritten to have a 96 foo d- way for an Arterial.
Commissioner Tyler asked thatnditiort A.1 be rewritten for
clarity. Also, the Water Effiq'�t Landscaquirement should
r............
be added.
Chairman Kirk
Commission.
gave a present
Dwight DeM
part of the prod
the Specific Pla
plan.
asked if Ift
app is
Mr. Patrick
tion on the pt
$a�loyd Watson
=,/Ir. Forre
t would like f ddress the
t..
representing the applicant,
He introduced Forrest Haag,
id Kelly Abeyratne who were
ag gave a presentation on
41"a �sentation on the master
I re were any questions of the applicant.
mod if there was a 60-inch water line
a roperty. Mr. Haag stated it was being
ni ger Tyler asked why the properties on Avenue 58th
1� 7 ".
not a 'red as part of this project. Mr. Haag stated they are
A .
lots t��t they were unable to obtain. Commissioner Tyler
J�fflje disposition of the palm trees. Mr. Haag stated the palm
p
e no longer agriculturally producing, and have become a
OM to the developer as they can be a hazard. Palms will be
in the perimeter landscaping, if they can be saved.
8. Commissioner Daniels stated two five acre parcels of commercial
land seem unreasonable. Mr. Haag stated the bigger pieces are
harder for one developer to develop. The Code requires ten acres
of Commercial so they split it into two adjacent pieces that partner
developers could develop.
96
G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-25-03WD.doc 12
Planning Commission Minutes
November 25, 2003
9. Chairman Kirk stated that Page 2.54 of the Specific Plan, the
Commercial is colored as part of Phase 2 and described as Phase
Chairman Kirk asked if he had an example of a five acre
commercial project that works. Mr. Haag stated a ranch/market
with a dry cleaner would be a good use. The mix similar to that
on the southwest corner of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street
would work. . �:.,
10. Commissioner Tyler asked if the req Ithent for a bike lane was a
problem.. Mr. Haag stated t tgn no issue with the
requirement. They will continue t3 vork staff to reflect them
on their map. +a
14.
There being no further stions of the applicanM�, airman Kirk
asked if there was any kf publio� `nment. Mr Hammer,
74-757 North Cove Drive, I� �� � Is, stated his family owns the
property on the (northeast co
rrt�f where this project is proposed.
F
In addition, he �s wife own 40 acres directly to the east
3 � �
of this property�.1ni Elm
� City s Cral Plan his property would
be zoned comm'ftial a'supported this project,
but would like to ow ��intend to do on the east side
antreet irr� nts ar�+ proposed for Monroe Street.
"Mr, �,
he.,stions v����#hey are moving and proposing two small
the 'property to the east will be developed
h .a
currently, there are no plans. The street will
110 foot width as required by the City. The
e just to provide some services for their
eing no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the
earing and opened the matter for Commission discussion.
a
fiere being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Tyler/Abets to adopt Planning Commission
Resolution 2003-097, recommending certification of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-483, as
recommended.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, and Tyler,
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None.
G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-25-03WD.doc 13
Planning Commission Minutes
November 25, 2003
15. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Abels to
adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2003-098, recommending
approval of General Plan Amendment, as recommended.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, and Tyler,
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None
16. It was moved and seconded by Comp loners Abels/Tyler to
��
adopt Planning Commission Res-099, recommending
approval of Zone Change 2003 commended.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissionq 'gngAAbels, Darr Quill, and Tyler,
Chairman Kirk. NOES: Np ABSTAIN: Non BSENT.: None.
17. It was moved and sec d by �missioners �r/Abets to
r ' -100 recommending
on 2003 g
adopt Planning Commisslor
a z ,
approval of S�pecific Plan : -787, as recommended and
amended:
a. Condition : ch k" -
a
b Condition a'd .��; pt shall meet the requirements
City s �e
� fflcler ,ltandscaping Ordinance
ROLE$ } LL: AY�'< Comm` oners Abels, Daniels, Quill, and Tyler,
irman`lk�OES: ne. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None.
11
oved andbonded by Commissioners Tyler/Abets to
k g,"g,l,$ 'ng Commission Resolution 2003-101 recommending
oe Development Permit 2003-787, as recommended.
YES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, and Tyler,
n Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None.
98
G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-25-03WD.doc 14
463
41
4� a: J�se.vy-l-
/a//Co/o a ta
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2003
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1
Attached are two corrected Resolutions. The first applies to the Specific
Plan, which has been corrected to remove approximately 587 acres from the
previous Specific Plan (218, Amendment No. 1) governing. the site. The
second is to the Agricultural Preserve Resolution to add minor corrections as
suggested by the City's attorney.
464
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,.
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR A SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW TWO 18-HOLE GOLF
COURSES, ASSOCIATED FACILITIES AND 1,400 RESIDENTIAL
UNITS RANGING IN SIZE FROM ± 3,150 TO ± 3,650 SQUARE FEET
ON ± 942 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
AVENUE 60 AND MONROE STREET
CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 2003-067
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
.WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 16t' day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
development principles and design guidelines to allow two 18-hole golf courses, a
16,400 square foot golf clubhouse, 4,000 square foot swim & tennis facility, 400
square foot gatehouse, 14,000 square foot maintenance building, and, 1,400
attached and detached residential model units ranging in size from ± 3,150 square
feet to ± 3,650 square feet, generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue
60 and Monroe Street, more particularly described as follows:
APNs: 764-200-001 thru 007; 764-210-001 thru 006
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 25" day of November, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public
Hearing to recommend to the City Council approval of development principles and
design guidelines to allow two 18-hole golf courses, 16,400 square foot golf
clubhouse, 4,000 square foot swim & tennis facility, 400 square foot gatehouse,
14,000 square foot maintenance building, and, 1,400 attached and detached
residential model units ranging in size from ± 3,150 square feet to ± 3,650 square
feet, generally located at the northwest corner of Avenue 60 and Monroe Street;
and,
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" (a amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in
that the ommunity Development Department has prepared Environmental
Assessment 2003-483 and has determined that although the proposed project
could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less than
significant levels, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impact is recommended for certification; and,
\\CLQADMFSI\PLANNING\Martin\SDP 03 787 Coral Option RCC RESO SP 03-067.doc r—
461
City Council Resolution 2003-
Specific Plan 2003-067
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
WHEREAS,, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section
9.240.010 of the Zoning Code to approve said Specific Plan:
1. Consistency with the General Plan: The proposed project is consistent with the
goals and policies of the General Plan in that the design, height, scale and
mass of the project is compatible with the land use designations in the General
Plan.
2. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed project will not create conditions
materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in that the
proposed project is consistent with the project's Specific Plan.
3. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed project is compatible in terms of land
uses, in that it is consistent with the type of development allowed under the
City's General Plan designations.
4. Property Suitability: The proposed project is suitable and appropriate for the
subject property in that the site is zoned for residential, golf course and
commercial uses in accordance with the Specific Plan, Zoning Code, and the
goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council for this Specific Plan;
2. That it does hereby approve Specific Plan 2003-067 for the reasons set forth
in this Resolution, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto;
3. That Coral Mountain Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment No. 1 is hereby
amended to remove the ±587 acres of the land that corresponds to Specific
Plan 2003-067, as illustrated on Exhibit "A".
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of December, 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
\\CLQADMFS1\PLANNING\Martin\SDP 03 787 Coral Option RCC RESO SP 03-067.doc
46-u
City Council Resolution 2003-
Specific Plan 2003-067
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of. La Quinta, California
\\CLQADMFS1\PLANNING\Martin\SDP 03 787 Coral Option RCC RESO SP 03-067.doc , "
RESOLUTION 03-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE CANCELLATION OF LAND
CONSERVATION (WILLIAMSON ACT) CONTRACT FOR ± 195 ACRES
FOR COACHELLA VALLEY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE NO. 58
CASE NO.: AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE 2003-001
APPLICANT: CORAL OPTION I, LLC
WHEREAS, American Date Gardens, a California corporation, entered
into a Land Conservation Contract to create Coachella Valley Agricultural Preserve
No 58 ("Contract") with the County of Riverside, pursuant to the Land
Conservation Act of 1965 (Gov't Code Section 51200 et seq. ), which Contract
was recorded on February 28, 1974 as Instrument No. 23559 in the office of the
County Recorder of Riverside County, California; and
WHEREAS, Coral Option I, LLC; a California limited liability company,
the present owner of the property (described below) subject to the Contract
referenced above, petitioned to cancel the Contract; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 16th day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
the owner's application to tentatively cancel the Contract for ± 195 acres for
Coachella Valley Preserve No. 58, generally located at the northwest corner of
Avenue 60 and Monroe Street, which property is more particularly described as
follows:
APNs: 764-200-007, 764-210-004 and 764-210-005
WHEREAS, the City has complied with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the
La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has
prepared Environmental Assessment 2003-483 and has determined that although
the proposed project could have a. significant adverse impact on the environment,
mitigation measures have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts
to less than significant levels, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
environmental impact is recommended for certification; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings to approve the tentative
CC RESO AP 03-0011
City Council Resolution 2003-
Agricultural Preserve 2003-001
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
cancellation of said Contract for ± 195 acres for Coachella Valley Preserve No. 58
because the cancellation is consistent with the purposes of the Williamson Act:
1. A Notice of Non -Renewal has been served: A Notice of Non -Renewal was
served on the County on or about February 26, 1999, and recorded on July
7, 1999 as Instrument No. 1999-320309 in the office of the County
Recorder of Riverside County.
2. Cancellation is not likely to result in removing adjacent lands from
agricultural use: There are no adjacent lands which are not currently zoned
residential or commercial.
3. Cancellation is for an alternative use which is consistent with the City's
General Plan: The subject property is designated as LDR (Low Density
Residential), Golf Course (GC) and, Neighborhood Commercial (NC) under the
City of La Quinta General Plan. The proposed alternative use for the subject
property will be developed as a resort community with residential, golf
courses and commercial uses.
4. Cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development.
5. There is no proximate non -contracted land which is both available and
suitable for the proposed use of the contracted land and development of the
contracted land would provide more contiguous patterns of urban
development than development of proximate non -contracted land.
6. The 'amount of cancellation fee pursuant to Section 51283 of the
Government Code has been determined and certified by the City Council to
be $1,168,125.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
I
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council; and
2. That it does hereby approve the tentative cancellation of the
± 195 acres for Coachella Valley Preserve No. 58, as depicted i
CC RESO AP 03-0011
n
4%
City Council Resolution 2003-
Agricultural Preserve 2003-001
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16 2003
3. That the owner must satisfy the following conditions prior to and as a
condition precedent of the City authorizing the execution and recording of a
final certificate of cancellation:
(a) Payment within one year after recording the certificate of tentative
cancellation of the cancellation fee of $1,1.68,125.00. If the cancellation
fee is not paid within one year from the date of the recording of the
certificate of tentative cancellation, then fee shall be recomputed and the
recomputed fee shall be paid in full as a condition of final cancellation of.
the Contract. Neither the cancellation fee nor any portion thereof shall be
waived.
(b) The owner shall obtain all permits and approvals necessary to commence
the project on the Property.
4. That it does hereby instruct the Clerk to record a Certificate of Tentative
Cancellation as required by Government Code Section 51283.4.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of La Quinta City Council, held on this 16th. day of December, 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
CC RESO AP 03-0011
City Council Resolution 2003-
Agricultural. Preserve 2003-001
Coral Option I, LLC
December 16, 2003
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CIVIC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
CC RESO AP 03-0011
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2003-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067
CORAL OPTION I, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
73. The site shall be monitored during on- and . off -site trenching and rough
grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors
shall be given to the City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing
permit.
74. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
75. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first. Certificate of Occupancy for
the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field
notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
76 The Specific Plan (Specific Plan 03-067) shall prevail and all other specific
plans governing this site shall be null and void.
41 7 r>
\\CLQADMFSI\PLANNING\Martin\SDP 03 787 Coral Option I\SP 03 067 CC COA.doc 20
4
IN
-���oFrt�9ti
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of
Resolutions and an Ordinance on: 1) Environmental
Assessment 2003-485 to Certify a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of Environmental Impact; 2) General Plan
Amendment 2003-095 to Amend Chapter 2.0 of the
General Plan to Allow High Density Residential Uses in
the Commercial Park Land Use Area; and 3) Zoning Code
Amendment 2003-078 to Amend Table 9-5 of Section
9.80.040 of the Zoning Code to Permit High Density
Residential Uses in Commercial Park District, Subject to
Review and Approval of a Conditional Use Permit
Applicant: City of La Quinta
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING: t
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Negative Declaration (EA 2003-
485) for General Plan Amendment 2003-095 and Zoning Code Amendment 2003-078,
subject to the attached findings; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2003-095,
subject to the attached findings; and
Move to take up Ordinance No. _ by title and number only for Zone Code Amendment
2003-078, and waive further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. _ on first
reading.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The Community Development Department requests consideration to amend the City's
General Plan (Chapter 2 - Land Use Element) and Municipal Code (Title-9) to permit
High Density Residential uses in the Commercial Park (CP) District with a Conditional
Use Permit and in accordance with High Density Residential (Section 9.30.070)
development standards.
The existing General Plan states that Commercial Park areas are for office and light
industrial (i.e., warehouses, storage, high technology manufacturing, and automotive
repair) and similar uses. Residential developments (aside from caretaker quarters),
including high density developments, are not permitted in this land use district. The
Zoning Code does not list townhouses or multiple -family dwelling units as uses
permitted in the CP District as noted below:
' r� 2
Emergency shelters
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Transitional shelters for homeless persons
or victims of domestic abuse
C
X
X
X
X
X
C
Single family residential
S
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mixed -use projects: residential and
office/commercial
S
X
X
X
X
X
X
RV Rental Park and
Ownership/MembershipOwnership/Membership Parks
C
X
X
X
C
X
X
Resort Residential
S
X
S
X
S
X
X
Hotels and motels
C
X
C
X
C
X
X
Timeshare facilities, subject to Section
9.60.280
C
X
C
X
C
X
X
Caretaker residences
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
The Commercial Park land use category was originally set up in the early 1990's to
assist light manufacturing development and has been applied to properties along the
Whitewater River (between Adams Street and Dune Palms Road) and adjacent to
Regional Commercial areas south of Highway 1 1 1.
The existing General Plan allocates approximately 64 acres to the Commercial Park
land use classification (Attachment 1). Projects that are currently in the CP District are
two mini -storage businesses and other commercial developments within Specific Plans
96-028 (La Quinta Corporate Centre) and 99-036 (Dune Palms Plaza).
This request was initiated by an application for a 192-unit apartment complex on the
east side of Dune Palms Road, south of Highway 1 1 1.
Public Notice
This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on December 4, 2003 for
this meeting, pursuant to Section 9.200.1 10 of the Zoning Code. Additionally, a
Notice of Intent was filed with the Riverside County Clerk on October 21, 2003, in
accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. Any written comments received will be handed
out at the meeting.
Planning Commission Action
On November 25, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 2003-103
through 2003-105, recommending to City Council certification of the Environmental
Assessment and approval of GPA 2003-095 and ZCA 2003-078, subject to the
attached findings and text changes (Attachment 2).
Ci i 3
Analysis
On November 4, 2003, the City's Redevelopment Agency determined that, based on
"existing and projected residential development in both Project Areas," the Agency
must secure 1,927 affordable dwellings by 2040, of which 771 must be affordable to
very low-income households. Further, the Law provides that the Agency must insure
that 1,672 affordable dwellings are in place by 2004, of which 669 must be affordable
to very -low income households. To date, the Agency has secured 894 affordable
dwellings comprised of 194 affordable to very low-income and 700 affordable to low -
and moderate -income households." This Amendment request will permit High Density
Residential uses in CP District areas (e.g., similar to the Regional Commercial land use
designation), which will assist the City in meeting its affordable housing requirements
as well as obligations to provide varied housing types and urban housing close to
Highway 1 1 1, a regional transportation corridor.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Environmental findings in support of the request are contained in the attached
environmental documents. Findings, as noted in the attached Resolutions and
Ordinance, can be made that the proposed Amendments will enhance the City's
General Plan and Zoning Code land use provisions by allowing high density residential
uses in a Commercial Park District.
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Negative Declaration (EA
2003-485) for General Plan Amendment 2003-095 and Zone Code Amendment
2003-078, subject to the attached findings; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment
2003-095, subject to the attached findings and text changes; and
Move to take up Ordinance No. _ by title and number only for Zone Code
Amendment 2003-078, and waive further reading. Motion to introduce
Ordinance No. on first reading; or
2. Do not approve Resolutions and an Ordinance of the City Council certifying a
Negative Declaration (EA 2003-485) and approving General Plan Amendment
2003-095 and Zone Code Amendment 2003-078; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Brry Hbrman
ommunity Development Director
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1. Zoning Map Excerpt
2. 1.1-25-03 Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt)
4r 5
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2,003-095 AND ZONE
CODE AMENDMENT 2003-078
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
CASE: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-485
WHEREAS, the. City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on
the 16th day of December, 2003, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider
Environmental Assessment 2003-485 for General Plan Amendment 2003-095 and
Zone Change Amendment 2003-078 to allow High Density Residential uses in the
Commercial Park land use area with a Conditional Use Permit;
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Negative Declaration has been
prepared collectively for the above -cited applications to allow High Density
Residential uses in the Commercial Park land use area within La Quinta;
WHEREAS, the City has prepared the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, California
Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, the City published a notice of its intention to adopt the
Negative Declaration and associated Initial Study in the Desert Sun newspaper on
November 13, 2003, and December 4, 2003, and further caused the notice to be
filed with the Riverside County Clerk on October 21, 2003, in accordance with the
CEQA Guidelines. The public comment period began on November 14, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 25th day of November, 2003, hold a duly -noticed Public
Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2003-485 for General Plan
Amendment 2003-095 and Zone Change Amendment 2003-078, and on a 5-0
vote, adopted Resolution 2003-103 recommending certification to the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. The above recitations are true and correct and are adopted as the Findings of
the City Council.
2. The City Council finds that the Negative Declaration has been prepared and
2.1
City Council Resolution 2003-_
Environmental Assessment 2003-485
Adopted: December 16, 2003
processed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the
City's implementation procedures. The City Council has independently
reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative
Declaration, and finds that it adequately describes and addresses the
environmental effects of the City-wide Amendment, and that, based upon
the Initial Study, the comments received thereon, and the entire record of
proceeding for this Amendment, there is no substantial evidence in light of
the whole record that there are significant adverse environmental effects as a
result of the Amendment.
3 The Amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general
welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant
impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2003-485.
4. The Amendment will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered
plants, or animals, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history, or prehistory, in that additional environmental analysis will
occur during site -specific development projects.
5. There is no evidence before the City that the Amendment will have the
potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which
the wildlife depends based on review of the City's General Plan EIR.
6. The Amendment does not have the potential to achieve short-term
environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals,
as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the
Environmental Assessment.
7. The Amendment will not result in impacts which are individually limited or
cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed
development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area
will not be significantly affected by the Project.
8. The Amendment will not have the environmental effects that will adversely
affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant
impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential
or public services based on review of the City's General Plan EIR.
473 7
City Council Resolution 2003-_
Environmental Assessment 2003-485
Adopted: December 16, 2003
9 The City Council has fully considered the proposed Negative Declaration and
the comments received thereon.
10. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of
the City Council.
11. The location of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings
upon which the City Council decision is based is the La Quinta City Hall,
Community Development Department, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta,
California 92253, and the custodian of those records is Jerry Herman,
Community Development Director.
12. Based upon the Initial Study and the entire record of proceedings, the
Amendment has no potential for adverse effects on wildlife as that term is
defined in Fish and Game Code § 71 1.2.
13. The City Council has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the
presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 California Code of Regulations
753.5(d).
14. The Negative Declaration is hereby certified by the City Council.
15. The Community Development Director shall cause to be filed with the County
Clerk a Notice of Determination pursuant to CEQA Guideline § 15075(a) once
accepted by the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council held on this 16" day of December, 2003, by the following vote
to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
City Council Resolution 2003-_
Environmental Assessment 2003-485
Adopted: December 16, 2003
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
4�1
0
Environmental Checklist Form
1. Project title: Environmental. Assessment 2003-485 for General Plan Amendment 2003-095
and Zone Code Amendment 2003-078
2. Lead agency name and address: City of La Quinta
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
3. Contact person and phone number: Greg Trousdell
760-777-7125
4. Project location: Citywide
5. Project sponsor's name and address: City of La Quinta
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
6. General plan designation: N/A
7. Zoning: N/A
8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
The City is considering an amendment to the General Plan and Municipal Code (Title 9)
which would allow High Density Residential land uses in the Commercial Park land use
designation and zoning district, respectively. The text amendments would allow multi -family
development at densities up to 16 units per acre, with approval of a Conditional Use Permit,
in the Commercial Park land use designation, subject to the development standards in Section
9.30.070.
The change is being considered as a result of a request for construction of 192 apartment units
on a 10 acre parcel (CUP 03-081 and SDP 03-788) located approximately 650 feet south of
Highway 111, and east of Dune Palms Road. The Initial Study for the apartment project is
being -processed separately, due to project redesigns, which require that the project review be
delayed (EA 2003-484).
9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
Not applicable. The General Plan and Zone Code Amendments would apply Citywide.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement.):
None.
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -1-
10
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Biological Resources
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Mineral Resources
Public Services
Utilities / Service
Systems
Agriculture Resources
Cultural Resources
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Noise
Recreation
Air Quality
Geology /Soils
Land Use / Planning
Population / Housing
Transportation/Traffic
Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the
project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and
an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable
standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
November 12, 2003
J
ty Development Director
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -2-
4 811�
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is, adequately supported if the referenced information sources
show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project
falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based
on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive
receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as
operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the
checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant
with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact"
to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures
from Section XVH, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from
the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the
project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared
or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where
the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -3- 484 12
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
X
scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
X
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway? (Aerial
photograph)
c) Substantially degrade the existing
X
visual character or quality of the site and
its surroundings? (Application materials)
d) Create a new source of substantial
X
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
(Application materials)
I. a)-d) The General Plan Amendment and Zone Code Amendment will not impact aesthetics,
scenic vistas or light and glare in and of themselves. Individual project proposals will still
require review under the site development and conditional use permit processes to assure
that they are compatible. Structures in the CP District are restricted to 35 feet in overall
height. No impacts associated with aesthetics are expected to occur as a result of
implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Code Amendment.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant w/
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
X
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -4- 13
48�
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21
ff.)
X
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract? (Zoning Map)
c) Involve other changes in the existing
X
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
(Project description, site photos.)
H. a)-c) The Commercial Park designation and zoning district occurs only
immediately adjacent to Highway 111. No agricultural lands occur in
lands, nor are there any Williamson Act contracts on lands in this area.
on lands located
proximity to these
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
X
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook)
b) Violate any air quality standard or
X
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD
CEQA Handbook)
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable
X
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook,
2002 PM10 Plan for the Coachella Valley)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to
X
substantial pollutant concentrations?
(Project Description, Aerial Photo, site
inspection)
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
X
substantial number of people? (Project
Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection)
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -5-
L��� 14
III. a)-e) The Amendments will not impact air quality. The ultimate development of any site for
apartment uses within the Commercial Park land use designation will require additional
review under the requirements of CEQA.
As stated above, the GPA and ZCA were initiated due to an applicant's request for a
multi -family project on Dune Palms Road to the south of Highway 111. The primary
source of pollution in the City is the automobile. A traffic study was completed for the
above -referenced multi -family project'. It has been estimated that 200 units on
approximately 11 acres would generate average daily trips (ADT) of 1,326 ADT. By
comparison, if an office complex were built on this property, 1,583 ADT trips could be
expected`. A similar trip generation was analyzed in the General Plan EIR for this
property, since office development was generally assumed for commercial park uses. It
can therefore be expected that the potential impacts associated with multi -family
development on air quality in the region would be generally less than those from office
development, which is currently the primary land use in this land use designation.
The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (Particulates of
10 microns or less). Projects proposed in this land use category will be required to
implement the Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan, which implements much stricter measures for
the control of dust both during the construction process and as an on -going issue. These
measures will be integrated into conditions of approval for the proposed project. These
individual projects will be analyzed and may include mitigation measures if necessary to
reduce potential impacts associated with PM10 generation on any given site.
Finally, the proposed change in land use designation will require the processing of a
conditional use permit for high -density apartment projects in this designation, to assure
that potential land use conflicts associated with adjacent and previously existing light
industrial uses do not occur, particularly as it relates to air quality emissions. This level of
review will assure that residents of future projects will not be negatively impacted by
industrial or quasi -industrial emissions which may be located adjacent.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant w/
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES —
Would the ro'ect:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
X
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
1 "Traffic Impact Study La Quinta Family Apartments Project..." prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, September, 2003.
2 "Trip Generation, 6 h Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, based on 30% lot coverage on 11 acres, category 710,
General Office Building. The number of apartment units was reduced to 192 on October 24, 2003.
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final GPA95.doc 1 -6- 487
15
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
(General Plan Biological Resources Element)
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
X
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by
the California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
(General Plan Biological Resources Element)
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
X
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means? (General Plan
Biological Resources Element)
d) Interfere substantially with the
X
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites? (General Plan
Biological Resources Element)
e) Conflict with any local policies or
X
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance? (General Plan
Biological Resources Element)
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
X
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan? (General Plan
Biological Resources Element)
IV. a)-f) The General Plan Amendment and Development Code text amendment will not, in and of
themselves, have any impacts on biological resources. Individual projects which may be
proposed will be reviewed to assure that they are not in a survey area, as defined by the
Environmental Resources chapter of the General Plan. Should surveys be required, they
will be performed as part of the project -specific CEQA review.
4�3
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -7- 16
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would
the ro'ect:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
X
the significance of a historical resource
as defined in Sect. 15064.5? (General
Plan Cultural Resources Element)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
X
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to Sect. 15064.5?
(General Plan Cultural Resources
Element)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
X
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature? (General Plan Exhibit 6.8)
d) Disturb any human remains, including
X
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries? (General Plan Cultural
Resources Element)
V. a)-d) The Amendments will not, in and of themselves, have any impacts on cultural or
paleontological resources. Individual projects which may be proposed will be reviewed to
assure that they are not in a sensitive area, as defined by the Environmental Resources
chapter of the General Plan. Should cultural resource surveys be required, they will be
performed as part of the project -specific CEQA review.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would
the project:
a) Expose people or structures to
X
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
X
as delineated on the most recent Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of
a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2)
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -8-
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (MEA
X
Exhibit 6.2)
iii) Seismic -related ground failure,
X
including liquefaction? (General Plan
Exhibit 8.2)
iv) Landslides? (General Plan Exhibit 8.3)
X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or
X
the loss of topsoil? (General Plan Exhibit 8.4)
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
X
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
(General Plan Exhibit 8.1)
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
X
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water? (General Plan
Exhibit 8.1)
VI. a)-e) The GPA and ZCA will not, in and of themselves, be impacted by geologic hazards.
Individual projects will be reviewed by the City Engineer to assure that they comply with
current standards for seismic zone construction, as is currently the case for all
development projects. These individual analyses, and the associated mitigation measures,
which may be required, will assure that impacts to individual projects are adequately
addressed.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS --Would theproject:
a) Create a significant hazard to the
X
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials? (Application materials)
b) Create a significant hazard to the
X
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the
environment? (Application materials)
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
X
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRIMEA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -9- 18
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one -quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school? (Application materials)
d) Be located on a site which is included
X
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment? (Riverside County
Hazardous Materials Listing)
e) For a project located within an airport
X
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in
the project area? (General Plan Land Use
Map)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
X
private airstrip, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? (General Plan
Land Use Map)
g) Impair implementation of or
X
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff)
h) Expose people or structures to a
X
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas
or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands? (General Plan Land Use Map)
VII. a)-h) The GPA and ZCA will not, in and of themselves, be impacted by hazardous materials.
Individual projects will be reviewed to assure that they comply with current standards for
household hazardous waste, and that they are not located adjacent to hazardous waste
generators. This review, and the potential implementation of mitigation measures, will
assure that potential impacts are adequately addressed.
49 :I
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -io- 19
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
UALTTY -- Would theproject:
a) Violate any water quality standards or
X
waste discharge requirements? (General
Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.)
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
X
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a
level which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)? (General Plan
EIR p. III-187 ff.)
c) Substantially alter the existing
X
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner
which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan
Environmental Hazards Element)
d) Substantially alter the existing
X
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner that would
result in flooding on- or off -site? (General
Plan Environmental Hazards Element)
e) Create or contribute runoff water
X
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff? (General Plan
Environmental Hazards Element)
f) Place housing within a 100-year flood
X
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance
Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map? (Master Environmental
49
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -11- 20
Assessment Exhibit 6.6)
g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard
X
area structures which would impede or
redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental
Assessment Exhibit 6.6)
VIH. a)-g) The GPA and ZCA will not, in and of themselves, impact water resources. Individual
projects which may be proposed will require additional review under CEQA, including
water demand analysis, and associated compliance with City water conservation
standards in construction and landscaping.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established
X
community? (Aerial photo)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
X
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general
plan, specific plan, local coastal program,
or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect? (General Plan Land
Use Element)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
X
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan? (Master Environmental
Assessment p. 74 ff.)
IX. a)-c) The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the construction of high density
residential land uses in commercial areas, which will improve the jobs/housing balance in
the City, and potentially add to the inventory of affordable housing in the City. In
addition, the Commercial Park designation has been applied to lands adjacent to the
City's primary arterials, and in close proximity to Highway 111, where transit routes are
available. Proximity to alternative transportation is also encouraged in the General Plan.
The GPA therefore enables the City to facilitate goals, policies and programs already in
place in the General Plan.
3
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -12- 21
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would
the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
X
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state? (Master Environmental Assessment
p. 71 ff.)
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
X
locally -important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment
p. 71 ff.)
X. a) & b) The Commercial Park lands in the City are in areas already developed and not designated
for Mineral Resources. The GPA and ZCA will have no impact on these resources
regardless of the development which occurs there.
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant w/
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XI. NOISE B Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation
X
of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards
of other agencies? (MEA p. 111 ff.)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation
X
of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? (Project
description)
c) A substantial permanent increase in
X
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project? (Project description)
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
X
increase in ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project? (General Plan land use map)
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -13-
434
22
e) For a project located within an airport
X
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? (General Plan land
use map)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
X
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels? (General
Plan land use map)
XI. a)-f) The General Plan Amendment and Zone Code Amendment will have no impact on noise
levels in and of themselves. The ultimate development of any given site will be reviewed
separately under CEQA, and analyzed for both impacts associated with the proposed
project on adjacent development; and the impacts of adjacent development on the
proposed project. The City will impose mitigation measures should these impacts be
potentially significant. The additional review under CEQA will ensure that impacts can
be reduced to a less than significant level.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING —
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth
X
in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses)
or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff.,
application materials)
b) Displace substantial numbers of
X
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application
materials)
c) Displace substantial numbers of
X
people, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? (General
Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials)
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -14-
495
23
XII. a)-c) The General Plan Amendment and Zone Code Amendment will facilitate the
development of additional high -density dwelling units in the City. The City's
Redevelopment Agency has identified a need for 1,672 affordable housing units in the
City by 2004, and has secured 894 of these units. Additional projects, which are proposed
as affordable, including the project on Highway 111 and Dune Palms referred to above,
will help the City meet its affordable housing needs in the short term.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57)
X
Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57)
X
Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.)
X
Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks
X
Master Plan)
Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA,
X
p. 46 ff.)
XIII. a) The General Plan and Zone Code Amendments will not impact public services directly.
Projects proposed on any site will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department,
under City contract. These projects will generate property tax which will offset the costs
of added police and fire services. These projects will also be required to pay the mandated
school fees in place at the time of issuance of building permits.
1! 1J C)
PAGreg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -15- 24
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XIV. RECREATION --
a) Would the project increase the use of
X
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
(Application materials)
b) Does the project include recreational
X
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment? (Application materials)
XIV. a) & b) The GPA and ZCA will not directly impact recreational facilities. Private and common
recreation space is required under the Development Code for multi -family developments.
The City will review individual projects to assure that they meet these standards.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC --
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is
X
substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street
system (i.e., result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle
trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
(General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.)
b) Exceed, either individually or
X
cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads
or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.)
c) Result in a change in air traffic
X
patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks? (No air
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -16- 25
traffic involved in project)
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
X
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Project
description)
e) Result in inadequate emergency
X
access? (Project description)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
X
(Project description)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans,
X
or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)? (Project description)
XV. a)-g) The proposed GPA and ZCA will not directly impact traffic and circulation. However, as
stated above under Air Quality, high density land uses appear to generate fewer trips than
office land uses. As such, the construction of apartments rather than offices on any of
these sites could reduce traffic impacts associated with General Plan buildout, and
provide a beneficial impact.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
X
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board? (General
Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
b) Require or result in the construction of
X
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
c) Require or result in the construction of
X
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
d) Have sufficient water supplies
(3
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -17- 26
available to serve the project from
X
existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements
needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
e) Result in a determination by the
X
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
X
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs?
(General Plan -MEA, p. 58 ff.)
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
X
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
XVI. a)-g) The General Plan Amendment and Zone Code Amendment will not directly impact
public utilities and services. Additional review will be required for individual projects
which may be proposed for any site under this designation. This analysis will include
review to assure that adequate electricity, water, solid waste and wastewater are available
at the time of development.
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE --
a) Does the project have the potential to
X
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to
X
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long-term environmental goals?
�n
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -18- 27
b) Does the project have impacts that are
X
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental
X
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
XVII. a) The General Plan and Zone Code Amendments will have no impact on biological
resources. Specific projects will be required to provide site -specific resource analyses, as
required by the General Plan.
XVII.b) The proposed GPA and ZCA have the potential to achieve both short term and long term
goals, by providing additional affordable housing in close proximity to public
transportation, shopping and schools.
XVII. c) The General Plan and Zone Code Amendments will not exceed those impacts identified
in the General Plan EIR, and may result in slightly lower impacts to air quality and traffic
and circulation.
XVII. d) The GPA and ZCA will not have any direct environmental effects on human beings.
Additional environmental review will be required for individual project to assess the
impacts associated with specific sites. These reviews will assure that potential impacts are
adequately mitigated.
P:\Greg T\SR CC GPA095 CP DISTRICT\EA 03-485 Final - GPA95.doc -19- 28
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGES
TO CHAPTER 2.0 (LAND USE ELEMENT) OF THE
CITY'S GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE COMMERCIAL PARK (CP)
DISTRICT
CASE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-095
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 16" day of December, 2003, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to
consider approval of General Plan Amendment 2003-095 to allow High Density
Residential uses in the Commercial Park land use area with a Conditional Use
Permit;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published the
notice (1 /8 page Display Ad) in the Desert Sun. newspaper on December 4,
2003, for the December 16, 2003 Council meeting, as prescribed by Section
9.200.110 (Public Notice Procedure) of the Municipal Code. The public
comment period began on November 14, 2003. Public Hearing notices were
also mailed to local public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the La Quinta Community Development Department has
completed Environmental Assessment 2003-485. Based upon this Assessment,
the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment;.
therefore, a Negative Declaration is recommended. A Notice of Intent to Adopt
a Negative Declaration was posted with the Riverside County Recorder's office
on October 21, 2003, as required by Section 15072 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 25th day of November, 2003, hold a duly -noticed Public
Hearing to consider General Plan Amendment 2003-095, and on a 5-0 vote,
adopted Resolution 2003-104, recommending approval; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard,
said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section
9.230.020 of the Zoning Code to justify approval of said land use text changes:
S:\City Clerk\Resolutions\PH 2 GPAReso.doc 29
City Council Resolution 2003-_
General Plan Amendment 2003-095
Adopted: December 16, 2003
A. Consistency with the General Plan: The General Plan provides direction for
growth and provides practical policy implementation tools to manage that
growth. The proposed Amendment is internally consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of the General Plan in that it provides for a mix of
land uses in the Commercial Park District and allows high density
residential uses to assist implementation of the City's Housing and
Circulation Elements goals and policies.
B. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed land use Amendment will not
create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and
general welfare in that high intensity residential uses are typically allowed
in urban corridors with appropriate environmental review and mitigation.
C. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed Amendment is compatible with
other high intensity land uses such as the Regional Commercial District.
D. Property Suitability: The Amendment is suitable for the Commercial Park
District in that it promulgates the goals and objectives of the City's
General Plan (i.e., Housing and Circulation Elements).
E. Change in Circumstances: The Amendment facilitates the opportunity for
additional residential development opportunities in the City; and therefore,
continues to offer a broad range of housing types.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings
of the City Council in this case;
2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2003-485 in that
no significant effects on the environment were identified; and
3. That it does hereby approve General Plan Amendment 2003-095 as
contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and made a part of this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council, held on this 16t' day of December, 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
30
City Council Resolution 2003-_
General Plan Amendment 2003-095
Adopted: December 16, 2003
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
" 3
J =..
31
City Council Resolution 2003-_
General Plan Amendment 2003-095
Adopted: December 16, 2003
EXHIBIT "A"
Amend Table 2.1 of Chapter 2.0 (Land Use) of the General Plan as follows:
"Commercial Park, CP - The typical land use under this designation are office,
light industrial and high density residential: warehousing and storage,
office/warehouse combined uses, high technology light manufacturing,
automotive repair, and high density residential uses."
Amend Program 2.1 of the Commercial Goals, Policies and Programs of Chapter
2.0 (Land Use) of the General Plan as follows:
"Program 2.1: Residential development shall not be permitted within 600 feet of
Highway 111 in the Regional Commercial designation, except as allowed in the
non-residential overlay in the Development Code. Residential developments in
the Commercial Park designation can be up to 16 dwelling units per acre without
being in a Specific Plan area."
5k"I4
32
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9.80.040 (TABLE 9-
5) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL USES (UP TO 16 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) IN THE COMMERCIAL PARK ZONING DISTRICT,
SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENT 2003-078
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on
the 161h day of December, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an
Amendment to Section 9.80.040 (Table 9-5) of the Municipal Code to allow high
density residential uses (up to 16 dwelling units per acre) in a Commercial Park
Zoning District, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit application; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published a
notice of its intention to adopt the Negative Declaration and associated Initial Study
in the Desert Sun newspaper on December 4, 2003, and further caused the notice
to be filed with the Riverside County Clerk on October 21, 2003, in accordance
with the CEQA Guidelines. No written comments have been received; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did on the 25' day of November, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public
Hearing for Zone Code Amendment 2003-078, and on a 5-0 vote, adopted
Resolution 2003-105 recommending approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the La Quinta Community Development Department has
completed Environmental Assessment 2003-485. Based upon this assessment, the
project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment; therefore, a
Negative Declaration is recommended; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of
said Zone Code Amendment pursuant to Section 9.200.020 of the Municipal Code:
1. The proposed text changes are consistent with the goals and policies of
General Plan Amendment 2003-095 to allow high density residential uses in
Commercial Park land use area with approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
The proposed change will enhance the Highway 111 urban corridor and
provide a supporting relationship with surrounding Regional Commercial land
uses. .) ;. J
SACity ClerMOrdinancesTH2 OrdZCA 078.doc 33
Ordinance No._
Zone Code Amendment 2003-078
Adopted: December 16, 2003
2. The proposed text changes will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety and welfare, in that a Conditional Use Permit application is required for
a residential development pursuant to the requirements of Section 9.210.020
of the Zoning Code.
3. The proposed change will ensure a broad mix of land uses in the Commercial
Park District that will enhance the City's marketability and promote a diverse
community of commercial and residential activities. A residential land use in
the CP area will enhance and provide a transition to Regional Commercial
land uses that abut Highway 1 1 1, a Primary Image Corridor.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To amend Section 9.80.040 (Table 9-5) of the
Municipal Code as provided in Exhibit "A", attached hereto.
SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Code Amendment has
complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that
Environmental Assessment 2003-485 concludes no significant adverse effect will
occur based on the Negative Declaration.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three
public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this
Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into
the Book of Ordinances of this City.
The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of
the City Council held on this 16' day of December, 2003, by the following vote:
34
Ordinance No.
Zone Code Amendment 2003-078
Adopted: December 16, 2003
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
35
Ordinance No._
Zone Code Amendment 2003-078
Adopted: December 16, 2003
EXHIBIT "A"
Amend the Residential, Lodging and Child Care Uses in Table 9-5 of Section
9.80.040 of the Municipal Code as follows:
36
Ordinance No._
Zone Code Amendment 2003-078
Adopted: December 16, 2003
Mixed -use projects: residential and
office/commercial
S
X
X
X
X
X
X
RV Rental Park and
Ownership/MembershipOwnership/Membership Parks
C
X
X
X
C
X
X
Resort Residential
S
X
S
X
S
X
X
Hotels and motels
C
X
C
X
C
X
X
Timeshare facilities, subject to Section
9.60.290
C
X
C
X
C
X
X
Caretaker residences
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
J 3
37
ATTACHMENT82
Planning Commission Minutes
November 25, 2003
G. Environmental Assessment 2003-485, General Plan Amendment 2003-
095, Zoning Code Amendment 2003-078; a request of the City for
consideration of certification of a Negative Declaration of environmental
impact, an Amendment to Chapter 2 of the General Plan to allow High
Density Residential uses in the Commercial Park District, and an
Amendment to Section 9.80.040, Table 9-5 of � £honing Code to permit
High Density Residential uses in a Commerm VP
ark District, subject to
review and approval of a Conditional Use .
1. Chairman Kirk opened the pu,�Jc' hearing asked for the staff
report. Associate Planner C erousdell pres T the information
contained in the staff r a copy of whicl�`�on file in the
Community Developm4W,, , .
2. Chairman Kirk asked if th ' '1,1�'ere any questions of staff.
I l
Commissioneri �fer asked why should not be tabled with the
a ,
application th d the char,, Community Development
PP
Director Jerry I-inar �d that iPPlicant were to submit
x �e''i•E't ?. t any
his applications ram, it wolf mutt issue as the General Plan
t
g�.
w9Ap ; current llo�pi,� ° A therefore taking the General
R'Ap
ment f x as it will not only assist this project
<,z �;
'
.z. en it is bmitted, t other areas of the Cit y as well.
3. rWir ��°°d if ere was any other public comment.
The`ftN ing none, Cirman Kirk closed the public hearing and
.:,
W'dN08 . p`e matter fog Commission discussion.
W,
4. Corissior��',Tyler questioned whether this was good planning
praA, s.
Corssioner Quill differed in that he thought it was a good
o ' Ortunity to have mixed uses.
6. there being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Abels/Quill to adopt Planning Commission
Resolution 2003-103, recommending certification of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental
Assessment 2003-485, as recommended.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, and Tyler,
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None.
G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-25-03WD.doc 38 ` !1
Planning Commission Minutes
November 25, 2003
7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Abels/Daniels to adopt Planning Commission
Resolution 2003-104, recommending approval of General Plan
Amendment 2003-095, as recommended:
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, `' Is, Quill, and Tyler,
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTA .. one. ABSENT: None.
8. It was moved and seconded b °k .M ners Abels/Danie s to
adopt Planning Commission Rqqoltion 20 105, recommending
'PROapproval of Zoning Cd" °AmendmeWl.tI 2003-078, as
recommended..:rv:,
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissi°� A
Daniels, Quilt' and Tyler,
Chairman Kirk. NOES: NoAIN: None. ABSENT: None.
H. ZoninQ Code Ameft
consideration of ann
z
9.160.020, Table 9-17 '
9.40.040e 9-1 OA
permitn >�entially
5,
include=etache uesthc
13 1 0. B of t, nta
map ti
003-079 1j . request of the City for
en,of i to the3 mnicipal Code Sections:
Exem� s, retng to Christmas Lights;
nARN UWN
: churches as conditionally
earea; 9.60.100.D.1 Guesthouses, to
in the Minor Use Permit process, and
�iubdivision Maps, to allow tentative tract
listed by the Community Development
r
r w where is no . Inge.
1. �p rmarR,15.1 opened the public hearing and asked for the staff
reIV!d Pla Manager Oscar Orci presented the information
cont,d in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Comnity Development Department.
� 3 r
CA#s.
2. ttinan Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff.
,;
3 mmissioner Daniels asked if the first one was enforceable.
Staff stated that was why it was being presented.
3. Commissioner Tyler stated Section 9.160.020 does not state
when the lights can put it up. It should give a date of when to
begin and end. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated
that in light of Code Enforcement issues it would be best to have a
date to begin and end. Staff recommended 45 days prior to and
21 days after.
r� , .
G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\11-25-03WD.doc 39 J 1
ern--�-
0J_
,%K�7
f� �w �5
C� OF ,ti9
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: December 16, 2003
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of
Resolutions and an Ordinance on: 1) Environmental
Assessment 2003-479 to Certify a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of Environmental Impact; 2) General Plan
Amendment 2003-094 and Zone Change 2003-115
to Change Land Uses and Zoning Designations from
Community Commercial and Medium Density
Residential to Low Density Residential; and 3)
Tentative Tract Map 31348 to Consider the
Subdivision of 37.72 Acres into 72 Lots and One
Open Space Lot, for Property Located at 46-201
Washington Street. Applicant: Madison Development,
LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING: J
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration
of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2003- 479; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2003-
094 to change land uses from Community Commercial and Medium Density
Residential to Low Density Residential, subject to findings; and
Motion to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further
reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading approving Zone
Change 2003-1 15 to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial
and Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 31348 to
subdivide ± 37.72 acres into 72 single-family lots and one open space lot, subject
to findings and Conditions of Approval.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The site is located between the City limits to the west, retail commercial to the
east, single-family residential uses to the south, and Plaza La Quinta Shopping
Center to the north (Attachment 1).
The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (Attachment 2)
and Zone Change (Attachment 3) to change land use and zoning designations from
Community Commercial and Medium Density Residential to Low Density
Residential, and a Tentative Tract Map (Attachment 4) to subdivide the ± 37.72
acre site into 72 single-family lots and one open space lot.
This project was continued from the November 18, 2003 City Council meeting.
The City Council directed staff to work with the applicant to analyze alternative
circulation options into the project in order to address circulation concerns along
Washington Street.
Engineering staff has worked with the developer and has identified three (3)
additional access alternatives for City Council consideration (Attachment 5).
The access alternatives include:
Option 1 - This option proposes the original proposal, which was an access
driveway into the tract centered along the tract frontage on Washington Street with
a 100-foot long deceleration lane. The Resolutions/Ordinance prepared for Council
contain the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval of the original
proposal. Should the City Council choose this option, their action would be to
adopt all Resolutions, and an Ordinance, and Conditions of Approval, as attached to
this report.
Option 2 - This option proposes an access driveway into the tract from a newly
reconfigured intersection at Singing Palms Drive and Washington Street with a 200-
foot long deceleration lane (southbound) into the project and a traffic signal. -�
J1
002
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 3 PtHappy.doc
Should the City Council choose this option, staff recommends that the item be
continued to allow staff and the applicant the opportunity to prepare the
appropriate environmental analysis, notify the surrounding residents, amend the
applications to include a General Plan Amendment, and prepare corrected
conditions. Currently, a General Plan policy establishes a minimum signalized
intersection spacing distance of 1,060 feet on Major Arterials in residential areas.
The project under this option does not meet this policy. This option would require
a public hearing by the Planning Commission and City Council prior to final action
on the project.
Option 3 — This option would allow a right -in only access driveway into the tract
from the reconfigured frontage road alignment near the southerly portion of the
tract on Washington Street with a 200-foot long deceleration lane. This option
does not require a General Plan Amendment; however, should the City Council
choose this option, staff requests a continuance to allow staff the opportunity to
analyze the environmental issues associated with the new project design, notify the
surrounding residents, and prepare corrected conditions.
Option 4 — This option would allow an access driveway into the tract from a
reconfigured/combined access that would also serve the Plaza La Quinta shopping
center, with a 150-foot deceleration lane. Under this option, the existing access to
Plaza La Quinta on Washington Street would be removed. This option does not
require a General Plan Amendment; however, should the City Council choose this
option, staff requests a continuance to allow staff the opportunity to analyze the
environmental issues associated with the new project design, notify the
surrounding residents, and prepare corrected conditions.
Recommended Option
From a traffic circulation and traffic safety perspective, staff believes that all three
of the newly identified options are considered better than the original access
options presented by the developer. Please refer to the memorandum from the
Department of Public Works (Attachment 5) for specific traffic and circulation
analysis. Generally speaking, Option #2 addresses more traffic circulation and
traffic safety issues than the other options. In addition, the City is making signal
synchronization improvements on Washington Street between Miles Avenue and
Avenue 47 to improve the traffic flow. This option, in concert with the City's
synchronization efforts, would result in improved traffic flow on Washington Street.
Staff estimates that Option #2 will cost approximately $1,000,000 more than
Option # 1, which was the developer's original proposal. Additionally, in order to
implement Option #2, a General Plan Amendment is required to signalize the
intersection 920 feet south of Highway 1 1 1 instead of the 1,060 feet spacing
s14
003
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 3 PtHappy.doc
required by the General Plan. It should also be noted that Option #2 will take
longer to implement than the other options (approximately six (6) months longer
than Option # 1) .
In addition, two single-family homes would have to be acquired by the developer in
order to implement this option. This would involve negotiations, buying the homes,
and relocation of the existing residents. If the residents were unwilling to sell their
homes voluntarily, the City could consider exercising the right of eminent domain,
since the area at issue would become a public street. The proposed Conditions of
Approval must place all burden of the acquisition on the developer. The City would
want the developer to execute an agreement similar to the one used for the
extension of La Quinta Drive at Highway 1 1 1 ensuring that the City would bear no
expense as a result of the acquisition. If the developer is unable to acquire the
property via good faith negotiation, the City Council could consider eminent domain
proceedings at the developer's expense. However, the City may not commit to
exercising eminent domain. The Council would make that determination only after
completing several procedural steps and deciding whether or not to adopt a
Resolution of Necessity. If the City Council declines to exercise its powers of
eminent domain, the developer is, by State law, relieved of the requirement to
construct the off -site improvement, and is allowed to proceed with a "default"
alternative. Thus, it is important to identify a default alternative that would become
effective if the property needed for the roadway is. not acquired within the required
time set forth in the Subdivision Map Act.
If, despite seeking eminent domain or requiring the developer to negotiate to obtain
the property, the City or developer is unable to obtain sufficient interest in the
property (to allow the offsite improvements to move forward) prior to the developer
filing the final map, then the requirement to make these offsite improvements is
deemed waived unless (1) prior to final map approval the City requires the applicant to
enter into a secured improvement agreement, requiring the applicant to construct the
improvements once the City acquires sufficient title or rights to make the improvements
or (2) the City, within 120 days of the developer's filing of the final map, acquires by
negotiation or commences eminent domain proceedings to acquire sufficient interest in
the land. If the City has not required the developer to enter into an agreement to
complete the improvements and does not acquire sufficient interest within the 120-day
period, then the condition requiring the construction of off -site improvements shall be
conclusively deemed to be waived.
The Default Alternative (requires no property to be acquired)
Engineering staff considers Option #3 to be the second best alternative. It provides
improved traffic safety compared to Option #1, the original proposal, but does not
provide the quality of traffic circulation contained in Option #2, the recommended
option. Option #3, the default option, requires Point Happy Ranch residents exiting r . f
;::�J
004
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 3 PtHappy.doc
the Washington Street access to turn right onto the frontage road and proceed
south to Highland Palms Drive where the residents can then gain direct access to
Washington Street at that signalized intersection.
Public Notice
This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on November 8, 2003,
and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. Since it was
continued to a certain date, no other noticing requirements are needed. Should the
City Council choose Option 3 mentioned above, additional public hearings will be
required and staff will notice the project in accordance with the Zoning Code
requirements. To date, three letters have been received from adjacent property
owners (Attachment 6). Any additional written comments received will be handed
out at the meeting.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Findings necessary to approve the Environmental Assessment, General Plan
Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map, can be made and are
contained in the attached Resolutions and Ordinance.
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-
479; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment
2003-094 to change land uses from Community Commercial and Medium
Density Residential to Low Density Residential, subject to findings; and
Motion to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive
further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading for
Zone Change 2003-115 to change the zoning designation from Community
Commercial and Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential; and
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 31348
to subdivide ± 37.72 acres into 72 single-family lots and one open space lot
subject to findings and Conditions of Approval.
2. Do not adopt the Resolutions or Ordinance approving the project; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
005
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 3 PtHappy.doc
Respectfully submitted,
r merrDen
munity Development Director
Approved for submission by:
Mark Weiss, Acting City Manager
Attachments: 1.
Vicinity Map
2.
General Plan Amendment Map
3.
Zone Change Map
4.
Tentative Tract Map 31348
5.
Memo to Jerry Herman from Tim Jonasson regarding
Circulation Aspects for Evaluation and Comparison
Analysis of the Options and Exhibits
6.
Letters received from surrounding property owners
S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 3 PtHappy.doc
RESOLUTION 03-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QIJINTA,„ CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PREPARED
FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-494, ZONE
CHANGE 2003-03-115 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348.
CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-479
APPLICANT: MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California,
did, on the 18' day of November, and on the 16' day of December, 2003,
hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment
2003-479 for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change land
use and zoning designations from Community Commercial and Medium
Density Residential to Low Density Residential, and for a Tentative Tract
Map to subdivide ± 37.72 acres into 73 lots (72 single-family residential lots
and one open space lot), generally located on the west side of Washington
Street at 46-201 Washington Street, more particularly described as follows:
APNs: 604-050-009 & 010; 643-170-001 & 002
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 23`d day of September, and on the 28th day of
October, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental
Assessment 2003-479 for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to
change land use and zoning designations from Community Commercial and
Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, and for a Tentative
Tract Map to subdivide ± 37.72 acres into 73 lots (72 single-family
residential lots and one open space lot); and,
WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with
the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La
Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has
prepared an Environmental Assessment 2003-479, and has determined that
although the proposed project could have a significant adverse impact on the
environment, mitigation measures have been imposed on the project that
would reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and therefore, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is recommended for
certification; and,
007
City Council Resolution 03-
Environmental Assessment 03-479
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City
Council did make the following findings to justify certification of said
Environmental Assessment:
1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that
mitigation measures have been imposed on the project that would
reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory in that the project
site has been conditioned to mitigate impacts to biological and cultural
resources to less than significant levels.
3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have
the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat
on which the wildlife depends in that, the Environmental Assessment
imposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts to less than significant
levels.
4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term
environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental
goals, as significant effects on environmental factors will be reduced to
less than significant levels as identified in the Environmental
Assessment.
5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually
limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or
proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development
patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed
project in that the site will be developed with less intensity than the
current land use designations under the General Plan.
6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will
adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, in
CC RESO EA 03 479 008
City Council Resolution 03-
Environmental Assessment 03-479
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
that the Environmental Assessment did not identify any significant
impacts which would affect human health, risk potential, or public
services.
7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the
project may have a significant effect on the environment in that
mitigation measures have been imposed on the project that will reduce
impacts to a less than significant level.
8. The City Council has considered Environmental Assessment 2003-479
and said Assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City.
9. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the
presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations
753.5(d).
10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project
is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle
Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of La Quinta, California, as fol.lows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment.
2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2003-479 for
the reasons set forth in this Resolution and, as stated in the
Environmental Assessment Checklist on file in the Community
Development Department and attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
La Quinta City Council held on this 16h day of December, 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
009
CC RESO EA 03 479
City Council Resolution 03-
Environmental Assessment 03-479
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
CC RESO EA 03 479
Environmental Checklist Form
1. Project title: General Plan Amendment 2003-094, Zone Change 2003-115, Tentative Tract
Map 31348
2. Lead agency name and address: City of La Quinta
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
3. Contact person and phone number: Martin Magana
760-777-7125
4. Project location: West side of Washington Street, immediately south of Plaza La Quinta
Shopping Center, and north of Crestview Drive
APN: 604-050-009, -010, 643-170-001, -002
5. Project sponsor's name and address: Madison Development
71361 San Gorgonio Rd.
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
6. General plan designation: 7. Zoning:
Current: Low Density Residential, Medium Current: Low Density Residential,
Density Residential, Community Commercial and Medium Density Residential,
Open Space Community Commercial and
Proposed: Low Density Residential Open Space
Proposed: Low Density
Residential
8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases - of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its.
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to amend the land use designations on f 12.23
acres from Community Commercial and Medium Density Residential to Low Density
Residential. The existing 8.87 acres in Low Density Residential located along the eastern
section of the property will remain as such. The existing 16.62 acres of Open Space
designated on the western half of the property will remain as such. The Community
Commercial designation on the northeasterly portion of the property represents
• - approximately 5.56 acres. The Medium Density Residential designation on the northern
central portion of the property represents approximately 6.67 acres. The proposed change
would result in Low Density Residential designations on all lands currently designated
Community Commercial and Medium Density Residential, with the existing 16.62 acres in
Open Space remaining as such.
Tentative Tract Map to allow the subdivision of 37.72 acres into 72 single family lots and one
open space lot. Access to the project will be provided from both Washington Street and
Highland Palms Drive, via a new roadway. An area of approximately 0.4 acres will be
dedicated to on -site retention. Lots sizes range between 8,133 and 16,409 square feet.
0 1 1_
-1-
A draft and final EIR were previously prepared for a commercial project on the site. This
document, although not certified by the .City, provides important technical background data .
on the project site, and has been used in preparation of this environmental document.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
-North: Existing commercial retail shopping center (Plaza La Quinta)
South: Existing single family residential development
West: Vacant, Open Space lands
East: Washington Street, existing commercial retail shopping center (La Quinta Court) -
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing. ,approval, or
participation agreement.) .
Coachella Valley Water District
-2-
0,12
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils
Hazards & Hazardous Hydrology / Water Land Use / Planning.
Materials Quality
Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing
Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic
Utilities / Service Mandatory Findings of Significance
Systems
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the
project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the.proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and
an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT -is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable
standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature
Date
013
-3-
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources -
show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project
falls outside a -fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be- explained where it is based
on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive
receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as
operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the
checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant
with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact"
to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,
and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation
measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) . Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site specific
conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared
or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where
the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
-4- 014
9.) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
X
scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6)
b) Substantially damage scenic
X
resources, including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
(Aerial photograph)
c) Substantially degrade the existing
X
visual character or quality of the site and
its surroundings? (Application materials)
d) Create a new source of substantial
X
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
(Application materials)
I. a)-c) The proposed project site has previously been a residential and. agricultural site. An
orchard is still present on the project site, as are some small structures. The proposed
project will consist of single family residential dwelling units, which will be one story in
height. The proposed change in land use designation will result in a lowering of potential
• impacts associated with scenic resources, since the structures can be expected. to be
smaller than those which would be constructed for a commercial project or a medium
density residential project, both in bulk and height. The property is immediately adjacent.
• to the toe of slope of the Santa Rosa Mountains. However, the construction of single
family homes, either one or two stories in height, will not represent a significant
obstruction to the slopes of the Santa Rosas. Overall impacts to aesthetic resources are
expected to be less than significant.
I. d) The project site will generate light from residential outdoor lighting, on a property which
currently does not generate light. All lighting on the site will be regulated by the City's
lighting ordinance, which ensures that lighting levels do not spill over onto other
properties. This standard, combined with the low lighting levels generated by residential
land uses, will ensure that impacts from light and glare are less than significant.
015
-5-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
Would theproject:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
X
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
.
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21
ff:)
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
X
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract? (Zoning Map)
c) Involve other changes in the existing
X
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
(Project description, site photos.)
II. a)-c) The proposed project site is still planted with date palms and fruit trees, and is at least
partially in production. The site is not, however, considered to be prime agricultural land
either in the City's General Plan, or in regional and -state documents. The site is an
isolated parcel now surrounded by urban development, and has limited potential for
continued agricultural use. The significance of the site as an agricultural concern is
primarily associated with potential historic issues, which are discussed further in Section
V., Cultural Resources, below. The site will be converted to residential land uses which
have the potential to maintain the character of an orchard, however, through the planting
or relocating of date palms and fruit trees. This issue is discussed further in Section V.
As an isolated and low -production date farm, the site has limited value for agricultural _
production, and is surrounded by urban land uses, and impacts associated with the loss of
this parcel to agriculture are expected to be less than significant.
016
IM
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
X
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook)
b) Violate any air quality standard or
X
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD
CEQA Handbook)
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable
X
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is anon -
attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook,
2002 PM 10 Plan for the Coachella Valley)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to
X
substantial pollutant concentrations?
(Project Description, Aerial Photo, site
inspection)
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
X
substantial number of people? (Project
Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection)
III. a), b) & c) The City's primary source of pollution is the automobile. The proposed project will
consist of the development of 72 single family residential units, associated
improvements, and, one open space lot. The residential units will generate approximately
708 vehicular trips per day at buildout. These trips will generate the following emissions
of criteria pollutants.
-7- 0117
Moving Exhaust Emission Projections at Project Buildout
(pounds per day)
Total No. Vehicle Trips/Day Ave. Trip Total
Length (miles) miles/day
708 x 7 = 4,956
Pollutant ROC CO NOX PM10 PM10 PM10
Exhaust Tire Wear Brake Wear
Grams at 50 mph 446.04 119597.04 23,378.88 - 49.56 49.56
Pounds at 50 mph . 0.98 25.60 5.25 - 0.11 0.11
SCAQMD Threshold 75 550 100 150
(lbs./day)
Assumes 72 market rate homes, ITE categories 210. Based on California Air Resources Board's EMFAC7G Emissions
Model. Assumes Year 2005 summertime running conditions at 75°F, light duty autos, catalytic.
As demonstrated above, the proposed project will not exceed any of SCAQMD's
recommended daily thresholds for criteria pollutants. Impacts associated with these
pollutants are therefore expected to be less than significant.
The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (Particulates
of 10 microns or less). The Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan adopted much stricter measures for
the control of dust both during the construction process and as an on -going issue.These _
measures will be integrated into conditions of approval for the proposed project. These
include the following control measures.
CONTROL
MEASURE TITLE & CONTROL METHOD
BCM-1 Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities Watering,
chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control
BCM-2 Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access
restriction, revegetation
BCM-3 Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical
stabilization, access restriction, revegetation
BCM-4 Paved Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road _
shoulders, clean streets maintenance
The proposed project will generate dust during construction. Under mass grading
conditions, this could result in the generation of 995.3 pounds per day, for a limited
period while grading operations are active. The contractor will be required to submit a
PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity. In order to
mitigate the potential impacts associated with PM10 dust generation at the site, the
following mitigation measures shall be implemented.
1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize
exhaust emissions.
2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power
poles to avoid on -site power generation.
�.,
-8- - 018
3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities.
4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site.
5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet
prior to the onset of grading activities.
6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on-
going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the
• site .that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust
is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each,work day.
• 7. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for
wind erosion. Parkway landscaping on Washington Street and Crestview Terrace
shall be installed with the first phase of development.
8. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -
related dirt on approach routes to the site.
9. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone
episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour
10. The project proponent shall notify the City and SCAQMD of the start and end of
grading activities in conformance and within the time frames established in the
2002 PM 10 Management Plan.
-9-
3
019
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --
Would the pro
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
X ,
either, directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by, the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
(Master Environmental Assessment, p. 73 ff.,
Draft EIR, The Pointe at Point Happy Ranch,
September, 2001)
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
X
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by
the California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
(Master Environmental Assessment, p. 73 ff.,
Draft EIR, The Pointe at Point Happy Ranch,
September, 2001)
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
X
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means? (Master
Environmental Assessment, p. 73 ff., Draft EIR,
The Pointe at Point Happy Ranch, September,
2001)
d) Interfere substantially with the
X
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites? (Master
Environmental Assessment, p. 73 ff., Draft EIR,
The Pointe at Point Happy Ranch, September,
2001)
e) Conflict with any local policies or
X
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance? (Master Environmental
Assessment, p. 73 ff., Draft EK The Pointe at
Point Happy Ranch, September, 2001)
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
X
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan? (Master
Environmental Assessment, p. 73 ff.)
IV. a)-f) The proposed project site is currently an underutilized date farm, and has. been for almost
90 years. The probability of species of concern occurring on the project site are therefore
extremely low. The site is designated within the critical habitat boundary for the
Peninsular bighorn sheep, but those areas on the Valley floor are not appropriate for
sheep habitat, and those areas above the toe of slope will be preserved as open space.
Finally, the site's proximity to Highway 111, and the lack of sheep activity recorded in
the hillsides north of Avenue 48 (extended), make it unlikely that sheep frequent this
.area.
A biological field survey was conducted for the previously proposed commercial project
for this site'. Although some natural communities were identified in this analysis, they
were clearly highly disturbed, and have little value. The only portion of the site which is
still relatively undisturbed, and which will continue to be so, is the hillside proposed for
preservation as open space. As such, impacts to biological resources on this portion of the
site are expected to be minimal.
The study did find, however, that potential habitat for loggerhead shrike occurs on the
property, particularly nesting and foraging habitat. The E1R further identified indirect
impacts to bighorn sheep as being possible for this site. The development of single family
residential dwellings will provide a different. type of development on the project site, but
will ultimately have the same potential impacts to biological resources, insofar as the site
will be substantially altered from its current state.
The project proposes to have the rear yards open to the hillside along the western
boundary of the. project. There may be conflicts which could occur as a result of the
project including access for bighorn sheep to poisonous plants in the project landscaping
and conflicts with domestic animals. These impacts can be mitigated by requiring the
applicant to implement the mitigation measures below that will reduce potential impacts
to biological resources to a less than significant level.
1. Should demolition, grubbing, earth moving or construction be planned for
initiation between February 15 and September 30, a field survey shall be
conducted to determine whether birds under the jurisdiction of the Migratory Bird
Act are nesting on the property. Should such nests be identified, buffer areas in
conformance with the Act, but no less than 50 feet in all directions, shall be
established where no construction activity is allowed, until such time as the
biologist determines that the nesting birds have discontinued use of the nest. The
required field survey shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first permit for
demolition, grubbing, grading or building on the site.
"Draft Environmental Impact Report for the -Pointe at Point Happy Ranch," prepared by Impact Sciences, September
2001. �..
-11-
0
2. A three person committee shall be formed, consisting of a representative of the
Homeowners' Association (HOA), a representative of the California Department
of Fish and Game (CDFG), and the Community Development Director. The
purpose of the committee shall be to assess the need for a fence/wall to keep _
Peninsular Bighorn Sheep from entering the project site. The committee shall
monitor sheep activity through various means, including interviews with residents
and visitors, and any available scientific data available and/or funded by the
HOA. If bighorn sheep are seen on the project site, the committee shall require
that the HOA, at its expense, construct an 8-foot fence along the -property line
between the project and the hillside. Gaps in the fence should be 11 centimeters
or less. At the request of CDFG, temporary fencing may be required. between the -
time that sheep are seen on the site and the time that permanent fencing is
required. The committee shall exist for a period of 10 years, unless bighorn sheep
are documented to no longer inhabit the Santa Rosa Mountains. At the end of ten•
(10) years, if any one member of the committee deems it necessary for the
committee to continue, it shall do so until such time that it is dissolved by a
unanimous vote of all its members.
3. The project applicant shall either provide an easement to the City, or evidence of
dedication to a non-profit organization, to be approved by the City prior to
recordation of the final map, ensuring that the preservation of lot 73 as open space
in perpetuity. The lot shall also be a lettered lot on the Final Tract Map.
4. Blasting and pile -driving, or other excessively loud construction activity, shall be .
prohibited from January 1 through June 30 of each year.
5. All lighting on the project site shall be directed away from the hillsides. The -
project CC&Rs shall include this prohibition for individual homeowners.
6. Plants toxic to bighorn sheep shall be prohibited on the site. The project
proponent shall secure a clearance letter from a qualified biologist, certifying the
suitability of the plant palette for the project site. The project CC&Rs shall
include this prohibition for individual homeowners.
7. The CC&Rs for the project shall prohibit dogs from running loose in the project
site.
8. The CC&Rs for the project shall include a provision prohibiting access by either
persons or animals to the adjacent hillsides.
9. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a plan
demonstrating that all pesticides, fungicides, herbicides and fertilizers used on the
site, during both construction and operations, are not harmful to wildlife. The
plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review
and approval.
0202
-12-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would
the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
X
the significance of a historical resource
as defined in '15064.5? ("A Phase I Cultural
Resources Investigation of the Point Happy
Ranch...," McKenna et. Al., March, 2001.)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
X
the significance of an.. archaeological
resource pursuant to '15064.5? "A Phase I
Cultural Resources Investigation of the Point
Happy Ranch...," McKenna et. al., March,
2001.)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
X
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature? General Plan Exhibit 6.8)
d) Disturb any human remains, including
X
those interred outside of . formal
cemeteries? ("A Phase I Cultural Resources
Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch...,"
McKenna et. al., March, 2001.)
V. a), b) & d) A cultural resource study was completed for the previous project proposed for this site2,
and revised at the direction of the Historic Preservation Committee.
The study found that the site is a potentially important historical resource, insofar as it
has been in operation since the early 1920s. Potential resources on the site include
residential and farm structures, orchards and roads. All these were studied for the report,
and recommendations made as to their -significance and disposition. The study found that
the site is subject to important potential oral history for the City and region. The study,
• further found that the structures on the site had limited or no historic value, primarily due
to significant alterations. The study did not, however, provide criteria for qualification as
a National Register structure. Finally, the study found that buried cultural deposits could
occur, and that site monitoring is warranted during earth moving activities. The
development of the residential project will have fewer impacts than that previously
proposed, however, the impacts to cultural resources will be similar, and must therefore
be mitigated, as described below:
1. Prior to issuance of the first certificate of Occupancy for the site, the project
proponent shall submit an Oral History to the Community Development
Department and La Quinta Historical Society. The oral history shall be prepared
in accordance with the City's and the Society's standards for such documents.
2 "A Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch...," prepared by McKenna et. al., March,
2001, updated October 2003.
-13- - 023
V. c)
2. The applicant shall submit a revised Phase I Cultural Resources Report regarding
the regional significance of the site in terms of its historical context, including but
not limited to, its relationship to the Bradshaw Trail, the stage coach line, water
wells, and prehistoric Indian villages and trails. The Phase I Cultural Resources -
Report shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and be
considered independently by the Historic Preservation Committee at a future date.
3. The applicant shall prepare a technical report on* the eligibility criteria for
National Register.
4. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading by
qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given
to City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit. A final -
mitigation monitoring report shall be submitted to the Historic Preservation
Committee prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first production home
for the project.
5. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property.
Materials will be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, '
primary research data, and the original graphics.
The proposed site occurs outside the boundaries of ancient lake Cahuilla, and is therefore -
not expected to contain any paleontologic resources.
-14- V`t
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would
the project:
a) Expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
X
as delineated on the most recent Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of
a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (MEA
X
Exhibit 6.2)
iii) Seismic -related ground failure,
X
including liquefaction? (General Plan
Exhibit 8.2)
iv) Landslides? (General Plan Exhibit 8.3)
X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or
X
the loss of topsoil? (General Plan Exhibit 8.4)
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
X
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
(General Plan Exhibit 8.1)
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
X
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water? (General Plan
Exhibit 8.1)
VI. a) i), iii), iv)',
b)-e) The project site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it
subject to liquefaction. The soil in the area is not expansive, and would support septic
tanks. The proposed project will have no impact on these geologic hazards.
VI. a) ii) The project site is located in a Zone IV groundshaking zone. The City and project site
will be subject to significant ground shaking in the event of significant seismic activity.
The City Building Department has implemented California Building Codes, which are
intended to lower the potential impacts associated with groundshaking to less than
-15- Q `� J
ti
significant levels. In addition, no critical facilities will be built at the site, rather single
family residences are the only structures planned. These structures will be required to
implement the most recent building codes in place at the time ofconstruction. Impacts,
associated with groundshaking are expected to be less than significant.
VI. a) ii) The site has the potential to be susceptible to rockfall due to its proximity to the slopes of
the- Santa Rosa- mountains. The City Engineer requires the preparation of on -site
geotechnical studies prior to the issuance of grading permits. However, this analysis
generally does not include rockfall susceptibility. In order to assure that the homes
proposed for the site are not subject to these potential impacts, the following mitigation.
measure shall be implemented.
1. As part of the site -specific geotechnical- analysis required for the project with
submittal of building plans, the project geologist shall include an analysis of the
surrounding steep hillsides, and shall make recommendations about the stability
of these hillsides in his report, including slope modifications required to assure
that roackfall will not impact project residences. The reportshall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits.
-16-
02 6�
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS --Would theproject:
a) Create a significant hazard to the
X
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials? (Application materials)
b) Create a significant hazard to the
X
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the
environment? (Application materials)
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
X
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste. within
one -quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school? (Application materials)
d) Be located on a site which is included
X
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section_ 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment? (Riverside County
Hazardous Materials Listing)
e) For a project located within an airport
X
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in
the project area? (General Plan land use map)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
X
private airstrip, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? (General Plan
land use map)
g) Impair implementation of or
X
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff)
h) Expose people or structures to a
X
_17_ 027
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas
or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands? (General Plan land use map)
VII. a)-h) The proposed project will result in the construction of 72 single family residences and,
one open space lot. No concentration of hazardous materials is expected in these homes.
The City implements household hazardous waste programs through its solid waste
franchisee. The site is not located within the vicinity of an airport or airstrip, nor is it -
subject to wildland fires.
:) �.
028
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
VIIL HYDROLOGY AND WATER
UALITY =- Would theproject-
a) Violate any water quality standards or
X
waste discharge requirements? (General
Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.)
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
X
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
.would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local. groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)? (General Plan
EIR p. III-187 ff.
c) Substantially alter the existing
X
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner
which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on- or off -site? ("The Estates at
Point Happy Hydrology and Hydraulics Report,"
MDS Consulting, July 2003)
d) Substantially alter the existing
X
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount
of. surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off -site?
("The Estates at Point Happy Hydrology and
Hydraulics Report," MDS Consulting, July 2003)
e) Create or contribute runoff water
X
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff? ("The Estates at
Point Happy Hydrology and Hydraulics Report,"
MDS Consulting, July 2003)
f) Place housing within a 100-year flood
X
hazard area as ma ed on a federal Flood
►�- ,,
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance
Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map? (Master Environmental
,
Assessment Exhibit 6.6)
g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard
-
X
area structures which would impede or
redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental
Assessment Exhibit 6.6)
VIII. a) & b) The construction of 72 homes and, one open space lot, will not significantly impact water
supply, nor will it violate water or wastewater requirements. The project proponent will
be required to implement the City's water efficient landscaping and construction -
provisions, which will ensure that the least amount of water is utilized within the homes.
The applicant will also be required to comply with the City's NPDES standards, requiring
that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters. These City standards will
assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than significant.
VIII. c) & d) A hydrology study was prepared for the proposed project3. The proposed project will be
responsible for the drainage of on and off site flows. Because of the site's adjacency to
the. Santa Rosa mountains, flows from the slopes must be accommodated within the
project. The hydrology design includes a combination of surface drains and underground
pipes, leading either to an on -site retention basin, or to a City drainage pipe which occurs
in Washington Street. These improvements will be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer to ensure that the City's standards for on -site retention of 100 year storm events
are adhered to. Conformance with these standards will ensure potential impacts are
lowered to a less than significant level.
VIII. e)-g) The construction of 72 homes and, one .open space lot, will not have an impact on the
City's storm drainage system. The site is not located within a FEMA designated 100 year
storm area.
"The Estates at Point Happy Hydrology and Hydraulics Report," prepared by MDS Consulting, July, 2003.
-20- 030 r_
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established
X
community? (Aerial photo)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
X
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general
plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an environmental effect? (General Plan
Land Use Element)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
X
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan? (Master Environmental
Assessment p. 74 ff.)
IX. a)-c) The project site occurs adjacent to existing single family development on its southern
boundary. The proposed project will continue this type of development by constructing
single family homes. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will
extend an area of Low Density Residential further to the north. The site is located
adjacent to neighborhood commercial development, thereby facilitating easy access to the
services required by residents. The change in General Plan and Zoning designations will
lower overall impacts on the site, and provide an added opportunity for the provision of a
variety of housing types in the City. Impacts of the change in land use designations is
. expected to be insignificant.
031
-21-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would
the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
X
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state? (Master Environmental Assessment
p. 71 ff.)
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
X
locally -important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment
p. 71 ff.)
X. a) & b) The proposed project site is within the MRZ-1 Zone, and is therefore not considered to
have potential for mineral resources.
-22-
43
032
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XI. NOISE B Would the project result
in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation
X
of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards
of other.agencies? (MEA p. i i l ff.)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation
X
of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? . (Project
description)
c) A substantial permanent increase in
X
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project? (Project description)
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
X
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project? (General Plan land use
map)
e) For a project located within an airport
X
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? (General Plan land
use map)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
X
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels? (General
Plan land use map)
XI. a), c) & d) The proposed project is in an area of the City where ambient noise levels are high, and
are currently estimated at 76.1 dBA CNEL at 100 feet from the centerline of Washington
Street, north of Highland Palms Drive. Further analysis performed for the previous
project on this site indicated that 2020 noise levels will reach 77.3 dBA CNEL4. Noise
levels on lots not fronting on Washington Street are not expected to exceed City
standards, due to their distance from the roadway, and intervening structures.
4 Analysis performed by Impact Sciences for "Draft EIR for the Point Happy Ranch, September 2001.
-23-
033
There are two potential noise impacts associated with project development noise .
generated by the project and impacting surrounding development; and noise generated by .
other sources and impacting the project site. These are discussed individually below.
The proposed project will result in the construction of 72 homes and, one open space lot,
-on 37.72 acres. Residential land uses are not significant noise generators, and are not
expected to significantly impact the noise environment in this area. Noise generated
during the construction process, however, has the potential. to impact the residential land
uses to the south of the proposed project site, both along Washington Street and along
Crestview Terrace. Although noise impacts associated with construction will be periodic
and of short duration, it can be an annoyance and irritant to adjacent residents. In order to
reduce potential impacts associated with construction activities as they relate to these
residences, mitigation measures have been included below.
The proposed residential development is considered a sensitive receptor, and noise levels
in the outdoor areas of the homes, including back yards, may not exceed 65 dBA CNEL,
in order to meet General Plan standards. `
The half -width of Washington Street at buildout is expected to be 66 feet (Augmented
Major Arterial Roadway Classification in the General Plan). The project proposes a
.landscaped setback of 20 feet. This will result in backyards at a distance of 86 feet from
the centerline. Without mitigation, noise levels in the back yards of lots 9 through 13 will
be over 77 dBA CNEL at buildout, and over 76 dBA at construction. The project.
proponent has included a proposed perimeter wall in the project plan. Noise levels can be
attenuated from 10 to 20 dBA by the construction of a 6 foot wall. Added attenuation can
also be achieved through the construction of walls on berms, because the berms absorb
noise impacts. It is important to note, however, that the effectiveness of the noise barrier
is directly related to its structure. A wall with any type of break, including decorative
fencing; entry gate, etc., has almost no effect.
It can be inferred that the noise barrier proposed will attenuate noise to 57 to 67 dBA at a
height of 6 feet. In order to assure that the attenuation meets the City's noise standard, a
mitigation measure has been added which also requires the addition of a 1 to 2 foot berm.
Because of the entry gates adjacent to lots 11 and 12, additional mitigation measures are
required to ensure that noise levels remain at City standards in their side yard areas, since
the gates will represent a break in. the sound wall. This has also been provided below.
These mitigations measures will reduce noise levels at the street -side lots to City
standards.
1. All internal combustion equipment operating on the site shall be fitted with
properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers.
2. All stationary construction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) shall be
located in the southwestern quarter of the site, as far away from existing homes
and the surrounding hillsides as possible.
3. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La •Quinta
Municipal Code.
4. A six foot wall shall be constructed on all sides of the property, except along the
western boundary.
. 034
-24- •
5. A six foot wall, constructed on top of a varying berm of 1 to 2 feet in height, shall
be constructed on the frontage on Washington Street. The wall shall be entirely of
solid construction, with no breaks or "daylight" openings. The wall and berm
shall be continued to the front yard setback line on the north boundary of lot 1 i
and the south boundary of lot 12. There shall be no breaks in the wall, from the
front setback line to the connection with the wall on Washington Street.
_ 6. _ . _.._ Only single story homes shall be permittedon-lots.
7. The pad elevations on lots 9 through 14 shall be 72 feet or less, so ' as to limit
exposure on Washington Street.
XI. b), e)-f) Residential land use will not generate ground borne vibrations. The project is not located
in the vicinity of either an airport of airstrip.
-25-
546
035
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact '
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING —
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth
X
in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses)
or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads. or other
infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff.,
application materials)
b) Displace substantial numbers of
X
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application
materials)
c) Displace substantial numbers of
X
people, necessitating the construction of
replacement. housing elsewhere? (General
Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials)
XII. a)-c) The proposed project will result in 72 homes (and one open space lot), which are likely to
generate about 173 residents. This increase in population is not significant, and is
consistent with projected growth in the City. No impacts are expected to population and
housing.
`� t� ►-t
036
-26-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
•
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57)
X
Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57)
x
Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.)
X
Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks
X
Master Plan)
Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA,
X
p. 46 ff.)
'XIII.. a) Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The
proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City
contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate property tax which will offset the
costs of added police and fire services. The project will be required to pay the mandated
school fees in place at the time of issuance of building permits. Impacts to parks will be
limited, given the buildout population of 173 for the site.
-27-
�. n
037
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XIV. RECREATION --
a) Would the project increase the use of
X
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
(Application materials)
b) Does the prof ect include recreational
X
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment? (Application materials)
XIV. a) & b) Some private open space will be provided within the project site, in the form of retention
areas and public open space. The proposed residential lots will be of sufficient size to
allow on -site recreational facilities. The proposed project will also be included in the
City's planning for new parks once constructed.
ors
_28_
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XV. TR.ANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC --
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is
X
substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street
system (i.e., result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle
trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
(General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.)
b) Exceed, either individually or
X
cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads
or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.)
c) Result in a change in air traffic
X
.patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks? (No air
traffic involved in project)
d) Substantially. increase hazards due to a
X
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
.uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Project
description)
e) Result in inadequate emergency
X
access? (Project description)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
X
(Project description)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans,
X
or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)? (Project description)
XV. a)-g) Traffic analyses have been completed for the project site for both the previously proposed
commercial project, and the analysis contained in the General Plan EIR . In addition, a
review of the traffic analysis was conducted for the currently proposed project6. The first
two analyses focused on the land uses currently allowed on the property, including
5 "The Pointe at Point Happy Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by Urban Crossroads, March, 2001; General
R- �
Plan Envirorunental Impact Report, City of La Quinta, March, 2002.
6 Letter Report prepared by Weston Pringle & Associates, signed Weston Pringle, P.E.; March 18, 2003.
-29- 039
Community Commercial, Medium and Low Density residential. The last analysis,
performed for the proposed project, focused on analysis of the proposed project. The
previously completed analysis, for the commercial proposal, resulted in a daily trip
generation of 5,715 ADT. The currently proposed project results in daily trips totaling
795 ADT, or a reduction in overall trips of 4,920 ADT. The intersection -of highway 11
and Washington Street is expected to operate at Level of Service D at General Plan
buildout. Although this level of service is acceptable, the proposed project will relieve
traffic pressures at this critical intersection, and must therefore be considered a beneficial
impact on the region's traffic and circulation.
The access to the site on Washington Street will be restricted to right turn only.
Westbound traffic on Crestview Terrace at the intersection of . Crestview Terrace and
Highland Palms Drive will be restricted to left turn only (southbound) since there will be -
a gate northbound into the project. U-turns will be available for those wishing to change
direction at the intersection of Highland Palms Drive/Washington Street and Washington
Street/Highway 111, which are both signalized intersections.
The internal design of the site calls for entry gates at both entry points. The entry gates on
Washington Street will provide a stacking distance of over 90 feet, which exceeds the
City's standards for stacking distances.
Parking will be provided on -lot, as required in the Municipal Code. Bus stops are
provided immediately north and south of the project site, and will be available to project
residents.
J � �
04 A
-30-
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant w/
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS B Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
X
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board? (General
Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
b) Require or result in the construction of
X
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
c) Require or result in the construction of
X
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
(Gendral Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
d) Have sufficient water supplies
X
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements
needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff)
e) Result in a determination by the
X
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project=s
projected demand in addition to the
provider--s existing commitments?
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
X
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project=s solid waste disposal needs?.
(General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
X
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.)
XVI. a)-g) Utilities are available at the project site. The land use intensity will be considerably
decreased by implementation of the proposed project, and impacts will therefore be less
than those analysed in the General Plan EIR. All utilities charge a fee for connection and
-31041.
-
service, which will be payed by the developer or homeowner when the. project is
constructed. These fees are designed to recoup costs for the provision of services by the
individual providers. No significant impacts associated with utilities are expected as. a
result of the proposed project.
-32-
04
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE --
a) Does the project have the potential to X
degrade the quality of the environment,
• substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or '
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to X
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long-term environmental goals?
b) Does the project have impacts that are X
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental X
effects which will cause substantial
• adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
XVII. a) The project site is adjacent to critical habitat for the bighorn sheep, and may provide
nesting habitat for birds subject to the protections of the Migratory Bird Act. Mitigation
measures have been included in this document which will reduce these potential impacts
to less than significant levels. The site has potential significance from a historic
perspective, and may harbor prehistoric materials. Mitigation measures have been
included in this document which will reduce potential impacts to less than significant
levels.
XVII.b) The proposed project and associated land use amendments will improve traffic conditions
at a critical intersection, and will reduce land use impacts to neighboring residents by
limiting development to single family residences. The project is compatible with the
General Plan and increases the City's housing stock. 1 t�
�- 043.
-33-
XVIL. c) The project will not have considerable cumulative impacts, and will not exceed those
impacts identified in the General Plan EIR for this area of the City, or the City as a
whole.
XVII. d) The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect human beings, due to air
-- quality and noise -impacts.. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non -attainment area for
PM10, which can cause negative health effects, Section III), above, includes a number of
mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts on air quality to a less than
significant level. Noise impacts have been mitigated through the installation of walls and.
the restriction of building heights in sensitive or potentially sensitive areas. Impacts have
been reduced to a less than significant level..
444
-34-
E
�
O
a�
c U
w
o
;
�
�
C
o
0
��V
E
o
o
o
o
°a�
co
W
o
cd
U
C)
>
A
I
I
I
Viz..
W
0
��U
O
��a
a
aka
O u
M
Rf
O
C
^
O o
4E-+0
o
w�tW)
A
C
� p Qcd
C)I��
..H
..z
a04
h�M
H�
a
d
�
A
V
W
A
F
A
U p�q
�A
a�
O�
UU
Q "
a�
y0
U
cd
U U
ao
Cd
o, U
aka
r°.3C)s
�N>Gn
vV,�
rig
rn
5
to
b
G7
0
0
°
.�y
o
I
V
V
Ci
U
�d
to00
•d 'd
�
�
�
Go
�b �
i
U
U
.
O�
U
V
•
O �•+
Ob
�a
�w
yw�
a Op
a
a
A
A
A
A A
c
to
bo
U
U
U
Gil
W
W
W Gta
A
O
O
�
w o
W
c
°
cr
3b
0
3
0bo
v
10
�
cy
b 11
^
U
0
cd
c
�_ �
U
0
o
o
cwn
c.w o
C��
F
d
.
A
U pq
�A
a�
OT
VV
W
v4
W
p4 V
rw V
brA
Cd
b)
o
c
o
o
.
4-4
a
o
aCd
UA
U
b
b
0
UA
U
U
UA
o
M
4
E"
4..,
0
^'
�
U
�
V
V
cd
Q'
a
o
cd
'�:
8
a
1O
W
V
'd
rA
.�
U
Qr
4
Q4
F
�
E�
A
A
U p�q
V
�p
�A
OV
UV
784
ran) b y "0'2 N '� �
W
E"
o 'i
� '�'
V
°�°°�°�t�aa
v�aa C,4,)aa v�aa via
b0
U V
b
bb
O
w
a�
a�
�O
go
Cod
UAx UA UA UA
U
O
W
5
�
O
z
0
Zed
bo
..
121
047
H
A
V pq
�A
a�
O�
UU
�
o
a
Qr
Q+
T!
A
Q
W H
pq
�
GA
al
P�
GQ
3
U
a
o
o
c
g b
s
�°
V1
Z
o ¢,
O
ti rACon
bQ
U
048
RESOLUTION 03-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA,-CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL .PLAN
AMENDMENT TO CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) AND MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR) TO LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
CASE NO.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2003-094
APPLICANT: MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California,
did, on the 18" day of November, and on the 16" day of December, 2003,
hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider General Plan Amendment 03-
094 to change land use designations from Community Commercial and
Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, generally located on
the west side of Washington Street at 46-201 Washington Street, more
particularly described as follows:
APNs: 604-050-009 & 010; 643-170-001 & 002
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 23" day of September, and on the 28" day of
October, 2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider General Plan
Amendment 03-094 to change land use designations from Community
Commercial and Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential; and,
WHEREAS, said General Plan Amendment 2003-094 has
complied with the requirements and rules to implement the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Resolution 83-63),
in that Environmental Assessment 2003-479 was prepared and determined
that although the project could have a significant adverse effect on the
environment, mitigation measures have been imposed on the project that
would reduce impacts to less than. significant levels; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be
heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of
approval to recommend to the City Council approval of said General Plan
Amendment:
r- /1
64
City Council Resolution 03-
General Plan Amendment 03-094
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
1. Internal General Plan Consistency: The proposed General Plan
Amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the General Plan in that the Amendment will provide for
continued single-family development adjacent to existing single-family
development.
2. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment will
not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and
general welfare in that the proposed changes will be less intensive and
consistent with existing land uses in the immediate area south of the
site.
3. General Plan Compatibility: The proposed project will be compatible with
existing and surrounding land uses in that it is consistent with
development in the immediate area and consistent with the City of La
Quinta General Plan.
4. Property Suitability: The proposed project will be suitable and
appropriate for the property and adjacent properties in that it will be
consistent with the permitted uses in neighboring communities and in
accordance with the Zoning Code and goals, objectives and policies of
the City of La Quinta General Plan. Urban services are currently
accessible to the site which, would allow for planned development in
accordance with goals, objectives and policies of the City of La Quinta
General Plan.
5. Change in Circumstances: Approval of the proposed project is
warranted because the land has been determined to be suitable for
residential development. The change in land use from commercial to
residential development is also warranted because commercial uses
currently exist adjacent to the site that can serve the surrounding and
project areas. Also, there is additional commercial land available for
future development near the site that would serve future commercial
uses to support the additional residential development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the City Council; and
CC RESO GPA 03 094 050
City Council Resolution 03-
General Plan Amendment 03-094
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
2. That it does hereby approve General Plan Amendment 2003-094, as
contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of, for the
reasons set forth in this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
La Quinta City Council, held on this 161.h day of December, 2003, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
CC RESO GPA 03 094 051.
City Council Resolution 03-
General Plan Amendment 03-094
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
052
CC RESO GPA 03 094
EXHIBIT A'
PARCEL MAP V028
P.M.B. U14/47-41)
L4 J-4
ll
If III
OD 1::: 1
"It
ct) If
C'r)
J
ui
(L
zfill I I III IIIIIII
2 11 fill
.j
<
V)
11111111 fill
ui LLJ
Z
< fill ll:.::l I
IIIIIIIII If
I I I I I I I I I I I ,/
I I I I I I I I I I I C
11 If
fill]
l l /�
1 1: fill
I'I'I'1'1'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'I'1'I'1'Iil'I'I %i'/ ! �/
EXISTM TRACT 2t17
M
9
hmW
- ; I .
OMM PAUM MW
val
ICE!>
0
z
(ZY)
ca"
rK
P LACE
4C) uu
FZAIIIAOO,
PALM GAFWM
I
Ig
PLACE
I.w
if
05
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (RM) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2003-115
APPLICANT: MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 181h day of November, and on the 16h day of December, 2003, hold a duly
noticed Public Hearing to consider Zone 03-115 to change zoning designations
from Community Commercial and Medium Density Residential to Low Density
Residential, generally located on the west side of Washington Street at 46-201
Washington Street, more particularly described as follows:
APNs: 604-050-009 & 010; 643-170-001 & 002
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 23`d day of September, and on the 28" day of October,
2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Zone 03-115 to change
zoning designations from Community Commercial and Medium Density Residential
to Low Density Residential; and,
WHEREAS, said Zone Change 2003-115 has complied with the
requirements and rules to implement the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Resolution 83-63), -in that Environmental
Assessment 2003-479 was prepared and determined that although the project
could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project to reduce impact to less than significant levels;
and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard., City
Council did make the following mandatory findings to approve said Zone Change:
1. Consistency with the General Plan: The proposed Zone Change is consistent
with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan in that the Zone
Change will provide for continued single-family development adjacent to
existing single-family development.
CC ORD ZC 03 115
054
R" �
J 15
City Council Ordinance No. 03-
Zone Change 03-115
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
2. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed Zone Change will not create
conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in
that the proposed changes are less intense and consistent with existing land
uses south of the site in the immediate area.
3. Land Use Compatibility: The new zoning will be compatible with existing and
surrounding zoning designations in that it will be consistent with development
in the immediate area and the City of La Quinta General Plan, as amended.
4. Property Suitability: The new zoning designation will be suitable and
appropriate for the subject property in that it will be consistent with the
permitted uses in the immediate area and in accordance with the Zoning Code.
Urban services are currently accessible to the area, which would allow for
planned development in accordance with goals, objectives and policies of the
City of La Quinta General Plan.
5. Change in Circumstances: Approval of the new zoning is warranted because
the land has been determined to be suitable for residential development. The
change in zoning from commercial to residential development is also warranted
because commercial uses currently exist adjacent to the site that can serve
the surrounding and project areas. Also, there is additional commercial land
available for future development near the site that would serve future
commercial uses to support the additional residential development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council; and
2. That it does hereby approve Zone Change 2003-115, as contained in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and made a part of, for the reasons set forth in this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council, held on this 16' day of December, 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
CC ORD ZC 03 115 F. ,
055
City Council Ordinance No. 03-
Zone Change 03-115
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE, JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
CC ORD ZC 03 115
056
EXHIBIT A
Illfiflllfi
I I I I i l
l'Itl�l+l�.l.'I
I.IIIIiIl.11lil ,/ /!/
iI111111111I111 � � , /
Ill Ilili l.l 111 / i
Illlllllllllll � /� /
I IIilllillllllll
11 1 1 1 II Irl,l I l
lllill��><Illlllll //
PARCEL MAP V02P
P.ME. 124/47-40
II I I �� I I I I I I Y // ••/
IIIIII It Iifllll IIIIII y i / �'•
r'llllllllllllll III1111111 /:; - ;;'.
I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I /�; '• •, ;;
I I I II II II I
i l I I
1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I1 I t 1 1 I 1 1 q
I I
flflflllflilflflftflflflftfiflflf,ff �•// .% `./ .
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I l t i l l l I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Al /
11.Illllllllltiflflllflflilflflflfi / i
I i l l l l l l l l l l l i l l l
if
OD
I I I I i I I l i i I t l I I I I '/%,� �� •%
IIIIIIItIIII111111fIIII111ft1111111I / / ��� /
IIIfItI1ti11111ItII11lIl11flflflflf J /
I llllillllllliltiillllllfltllllltlll / ./ /�
flffllffflftffiffffffflffiiffflfiflfll / / /'�
fttlflltflfififlllfiflllflllflflltltllf ,
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I t l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I I I I
MM
i W I I I I I I( 1 1 1 1 'I 1 1 •'/
1 Ililllllllllllllltllllllllll j/% / /
I � Illttlllllllliftflflllllflfli
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
`•♦ Itflflllllllf,lflflflftlllllllll
I l l i l l l l l l l l l l i l
M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1
f O ` + Illllllillllitltllltlflllillllflllll ,
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I • I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 1 I•I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I
I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1
I IIIIIIIIIIIilliflllllllflllllfl�lllll llftllll
flflffflflffif1f11111fill fill IIIIIIll111111i1
1 I1111llllllllllllflt 111'IIfIII11fIIIIIIIiII
i.� lllllitll�llllti.11ll.$�.$llll 0 1.11111111111.111111
I IIIIIIIIIIIIilltlflllll � Illllltllfllltllll.
f 0 am IIIIIfIff11111fitlllllllllfllllllillflllllll
I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I IIIIItitlflfitllfll1111t1111111111111111111
I I I I I I I I I I I I III
11111IIIIIIIItI1111II111111IIIfIllllll111
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 7 1 1
•-
f � � ilffffffiflflllilfiflfllfillllllllflll /=-...
I IIIIIIIIffflflflfiflflfllfflfftflflflf � •,•
I l l l l l t l l l l l l l l l l I I
I � I I 1 1 1I 11 l l l l
f � I Ilfiflfllfllffffiflllflfllilllllltlll�
II I I 1t 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l Il Jill
l Jill I l 1 l Jill 1 l l 1lt lI ; /.•
I l j
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIItfIflflllfff111fIfII1�!lllflfl
Iflflflflllfiflfififllffifflflflflflilllltillll
Iflfiflllffilfiliffflfltflflfllllllllllililll �.,
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ;/ •
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /� //•,
'Iflllflflflfiftlllfllllllllllllllll.ltllll //Y�Y�•�y
/
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IfIiIllllllllillliflflflilffflflflfifft / � j /
Itllllllillllllllitltlllflfiflflfifl,lf
flflflllfiflfiflffflfllflllf.11lllllllll , � /
I I l t l l l l l l l i l l l l l l l l / /�•
I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fill
1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
IIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIf111fIIIIIII
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Illillllitlllfltif lflflflfllllllllllllllll ji
I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I l l f l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l •/ ,
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l l l
I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I t l l j
Illlllllllllllllllflflflflflfffffilfff
Illtlllllllllllillllilllllllllllflit �
II11111111111.Illliflllifflflflflflf / /,
(IIIItlilllllllllllfllflflfiflflfll
I l l l l l l l l i l t l l l l l
I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1
fI111111111111fII111fIflllillflll
IIIfIII1111t11tlllllfiflflflflitflf
II I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Illlllllllllfltlllflllfllllllllllllll
I�f�lll�l�lllllllllillltllllrlil,l�l,l.
EXLSTMY,, TRACT 21i7 I� I
/
V
/
\\ n. I n r I C• I na I C1 i
l
r"> \ MOM PALMS MTA%
I
I i
I
I i
/ •�
I 2
0
st
lor
PLACE
uu
I
\ I
i
PALM OAIDEN I
Ij
�'
\ PLC ` I
I
a
1
I
at
•
1057
,
RESOLUTION 03-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
31348 TO SUBDIVIDE ± 37.72 ACRES INTO 73 LOTS
CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
APPLICANT: MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did,
on the 18" day of November, and on the 16' day of December, 2003, hold a duly
noticed Public Hearing to consider Tentative Tract Map 31348 to subdivide
± 37.72 acres into 73 lots (72 single-family residential lots and one open space
lot), generally located on the west side of Washington Street at 46-201
Washington Street, more particularly described as follows:
APNs: 604-050-009 & 010; 643-170-001 & 002
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 23d day of September, and on the 28" day of October,
2003, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider consider Tentative Tract Map
31348 to subdivide ± 37.72 acres into 73 lots (72 single-family residential lots and
one open space lot); and,
WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map 31348 has complied with the
requirements and rules to implement the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that Environmental
Assessment 2003-479 was prepared and determined that although the project
could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, mitigation measures
have been imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to less than significant
levels; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings to approve said Tentative
Tract Map 31348:
1. The proposed tract map will be consistent with the City of La Quinta General
Plan in that the property will be designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and
Open Space (OS) which, allows single family residential uses and natural open
space.
2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision will be consistent with
the City of La Quinta General Plan in that all streets and improvements in the
t
CC RESO TTM 31348
058
City Council Resolution 03-
Tentative Tract Map 31348
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
proposed project will conform to City standards contained in the General Plan
and Subdivision Ordinance. Access for the single-family lots will be provided
from existing streets in the immediate area. The density and design for the
tract will comply with the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
3. The design of the proposed subdivision and improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially injure fish or wildlife,
or their habitat in that the subject site is physically suitable for the proposed
land division and currently, development exists to the north, east, and south of
the site which has reduced the amount of habitat suitable for any fish or
wildlife.
4. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems in that the applicant will be conditioned meet all
applicable requirements of the City of La Quinta to provide a safe environment
for the public.
5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of
property within the proposed subdivision in that there are existing streets that
will provide direct access to the site. All required public easements will
provide access to the site or support necessary infrastructure improvements
for the proposed project.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the City Council for this Tentative Tract Map;
2. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 31348 for the reasons set
forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council, held on this 16t' day of December, 2003, by the following
vote, to wit:
CC RESO TTM 31348 059
�'
City Council Resolution 03-
Tentative Tract Map 31348
Madison Development, LLC
December 16, 2003
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DONALD ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(City Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
CC RESO TTM 31348
of
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
GENERAL
1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La
Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or
proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative
Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole
discretion in selecting its defense counsel.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or
proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense.
2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall
comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410
through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act, ), and Chapter 13 of the La
Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC").
The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at
www.la-quinta.org.
3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the
City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from
the following agencies:
Fire Marshal
Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit)
• Community Development Department
Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department
Desert Sands Unified School District
Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)
Imperial Irrigation District (IID)
California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB)
SunLine Transit Agency
The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or
clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include
approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such
approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval.
0G11
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
w- -MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES
stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater
Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean
Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water
Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ.
A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of
land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less
than five (5) acres. of land, but which is a part of a construction
project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the
Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution
Protection Plan ("SWPPP").
B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project.
C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for
inspection at the project site at all times through and including
acceptance of all improvements by the City.
D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following
Best Management Practices ("BMPs"). (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC):
1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control).
2) Temporary Sediment Control.
3) Wind Erosion Control.
4) Tracking Control.
5) Non -Storm Water Management.
6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control.
E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall
be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading,
pursuant to this project.
F. The approved SWPPP and BMP shall remain in effect for the entire
duration of project construction until all improvements are completed
and accepted by the City.
�. 062
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
-MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the
Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at
the time of issuance of building permit(s).
PROPERTY RIGHTS
6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer
easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper
functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include
irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for
emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of
essential improvements.
7. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street
right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code,
applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer.
8. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this
development include:
A. PUBLIC STREETS
1) Washington Street - (Major Augmented Arterial, 132' ROW) -
No additional right of way is required for the ultimate developed
right of way except for an additional right of way dedication at
the primary entry of 4 feet (75 feet from the centerline) running
laterally along the east boundary of the tentative tract from the
primary entry to its northerly end, to accommodate a
deceleration/right turn only lane conditioned under "STREET
AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS."
9. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street
right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code,
applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer.
10. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for
this development include:
'7 4
_f. 063
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
A. PRIVATE STREETS
Property line shall be placed at the back of curb. The required right of
way shall accommodate the required roadway travel width plus the
approved curb and gutter design. Use of smooth curves instead of
angular lines at property lines is recommended.
1) Lot B and C - Private Residential Streets measured from gutter
flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 36-foot travel width
except at the entry drives.
B. CUL DE SACS
1) The cul-de-sac shall conform to the shape shown on the
tentative map with 38-foot curb radius at the bulb or larger,
using a smooth curve. instead of angular lines similar to the
layout shown on the tentative map.
11. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right
and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other, features contained in the
approved construction plans.
12. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street
right-of-ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary
prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the
applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written
request by the City.
13. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide
public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private
streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the
express written approval of IID.
14. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public
right-of-ways as follows:
A. Washington Street (Major Arterial) -.20-foot from the R/W-P/L.
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT ,MAP 31348
-MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall
design is approved.
The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not
limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes.
Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned
setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those
purposes on the Final Map.
15. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the
placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins,
mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map.
16. Direct vehicular access to Washington Street from lots with frontage along
Washington Street is restricted, except for those access points identified on
the tentative tract map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of
approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded
final tract map.
17. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as
appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading,
retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will
occur.
18. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any
portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative
Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement
is approved by the City Engineer.
FINAL MAPS
19. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish
accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's
map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files
shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a
basic AutoCAD program.
,)76
065
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a
file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will
accept a raster -image file of such Final Map.
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as
"engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or
licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California.
20. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of
qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with
the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC.
21. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review
and approval by the City. A separate .set of plans for each line item specified
below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified,
unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be
prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note,
the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed
here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility
purveyors.
A. On -Site Street Plan: 1 " 40' Horizontal,
1 " = 40' Vertical
B. On -Site Rough Grading/Drainage Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal
Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not
listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior
to commencing plan preparation.
All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans shall show all existing improvements
for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance
sufficient to show any required design transitions.
"Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of
Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum
of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions.
r h
CC C OA TTM 31348 066
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
22. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes
for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the
applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or
construction notes from the City.
23. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all
approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City
Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they
may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program.
At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the
improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in
order to reflect the as -built conditions.
Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD
format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the
City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans.
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS
24. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and
off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a
fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ( SIA")
guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of
its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be
required by the City.
25. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and
between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of
guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative
Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement
Security), LQMC.
26. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal
of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the
proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey
monumentation.
►- i 7 !
l3
0 G',
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MAQISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
27. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map,
and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be
required to:
A. Construct certain off -site improvements.
B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the
reimbursement of its costs by others.
C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that
are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map.
D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by
others.
E. To agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require.
In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are
constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final
Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the
costs of such improvements.
28. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the
applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed
on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey
monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such
estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution,
or ordinance.
For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs
shall be approved by the City Engineer.
At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for
conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall
also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 1 1" reduction of each page of the
Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1/2" x 11" Vicinity Map.
068
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
-MADISON DEVELOPMENT,- LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be
approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the
applicant's detailed cost estimates.
Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V.
improvements.
Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail
to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have
the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections,
withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the
surety to complete the improvements.
GRADING
29. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050
(Grading Improvements), LQMC.
30. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other
purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City
Engineer.
31. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain
approval of all of the following:
A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect,
B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified
engineer,
C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter
6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC.
D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with
Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge
permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC.
All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the
Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils
CC COA TTM 31348
O G 9
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
engineer, or by an engineering geologist.
A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been
prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953.
The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in
an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive
Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading
permit.
32. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to
prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded,
undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or
stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the
Fugitive Dust Control Plan.
33. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have
undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section
9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement.
The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback
area, except for the backslope (ie the slope at the back of the Landscape lot)
which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum
slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when
the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six (6) of the curb, otherwise the
maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved
parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half
inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb.
34. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City
Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the
tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed
elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval.
35. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one
foot from the building pads in adjacent developments.
36. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the
adjoining properties and the lots within this development.
CC COA TTM 31348
581
070
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more
than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage,
where the differential shall not exceed five feet.
Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may
consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns,
maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade
differential.
37. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of
the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the
elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall
submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial
conformance finding review.
38. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant
shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified
engineer or surveyor.
Each pad certification shall list , the pad elevation as shown on the approved
grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if
any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad
soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if
submitted at different times.
39. This development shall comply with Chapter 8.11 (Flood Hazard
Regulations), LQMC. If any portion of any proposed building lot in the
development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on
the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to
ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation) are above the level
of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95 %
Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 65.5(a) (6). Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are
so located, the applicant. shall furnish elevation certifications, as required by
FEMA, that the above conditions have been met.
CC COA TTM 31348
071.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON- DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
DRAINAGE
40. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120
(Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically,
stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within
the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The
tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public
streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event
producing the greatest total run off.
41. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two
inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless
the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise.
42. The applicant shall discharge storm water not retained in the proposed
retention basin drainage system from on -site, and off -site tributary area
assigned to the development site, into the existing storm drain located in
Washington Street. The applicant shall pay a prorated share of cost to design
and install the storm drain. The prorated share shall be calculated on the
basis on the percentage of the capacity of the existing storm drain system
utilized by the development's storm water.
The applicant's designer shall submit a hydrology report and calculations of
the abovementioned capacity usage with the rough grading plan application.
43. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water
(through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or
adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as
a requirement for development of this property.
44. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless
approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer.
45. Stormwater may not be retained, in landscaped parkways or landscaped
setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls
onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback
areas. The perimeter setback -and parkway areas in the street right-of-way
shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section
072
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
'MADISON -DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC.
46. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood
boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development.
47. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of storm
drain and retention basin capacity to flow out of the development through a
designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route.
48. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received
and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief
route.
49. When an applicant proposes discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly,
into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall indemnify
the City from the costs of any sampling and testing of the development's
drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or
other City- or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other
obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The
indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to the
issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, and shall be binding
on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in
the land within this tentative parcel map excepting therefrom those portions
required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the
indemnification shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is
approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the
final development CC&Rs for meeting these potential obligations.
UTILITIES
50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110
(Utilities), LQMC.
51. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location
of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility
structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults,
water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for
practical and aesthetic purposes.
�) 8 4
CC COA TTM 31348 073
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
52. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed
development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground.
All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles
are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground.
53. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For
installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply
with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City
Engineer.
The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction
for approval by the City Engineer.
STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
54. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street
Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access
For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and
Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets
are proposed.
55. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform
with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.)
A. OFF -SITE STREETS
1) Washington Street (MajorAugmented Arterial; 132' R/W):
No additional widening on the west side of the street along all
frontage adjacent to the Tentative Map boundary is required except
at locations where additional street width is needed to
accommodate:
a) A deceleration/right turn only lane at the Washington Street
Primary Entry. The west curb face shall be located sixty two
feet (62') west of the centerline and shall accommodate an
074
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
1 1-foot wide by 115-foot long (including taper) deceleration
lane.
Other required improvements in the Washington Street right of way
and/or adjacent landscape setback area include:
b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb,
gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs.
c) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk
shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave
and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either
touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the
curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk
curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at
each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to
assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall
meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5
feet of the perimeter wail at intervals not to exceed 250 feet.
The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision
boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing
improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions
in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks).
B. PRIVATE STREETS
1) Lot B and C - Construct full 36-foot wide travel width
improvements within a 37-foot right-of-way where the
residential streets are double loaded, except at the entry drive
areas.
C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS
1) Shall be constructed according to the lay -out shown on the
tentative map with 38-foot curb radius or greater at the bulb
using a smooth curve instead of angular lines similar to the
layout shown on the rough grading plan.
CC COA TTM 31348 075
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON-DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
D. GATED ENTRY DRIVES
1) Primary Entry (Washington Street)
a) The gated main entry on Washington Street shall provide
for a minimum of two -car minimum stacking capacity for
inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around
outlet for non -accepted vehicles.
b) The applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of
ill = 10, demonstrating that those passenger vehicles
that do not gain entry into the development can safely
make a full turn -around back out onto the main street
from the gated entry.
c) Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of
the gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents,
and one lane for visitors.
2) Secondary Entry (Highland Palms Drive)
a) The gated main entry on Highland Palms Drive shall be for
resident's entry only. The applicant shall submit a
detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating
that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into
the development can safely make a "U" Turn back out
onto the Highland Palms Drive from the gated entry.
Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner
cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on
the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may
be determined by the City Engineer.
The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design
procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil
strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic).
Minimum structural sections shall be as follows:
Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b.
CC COA TTM 31348
J
u
076
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
or the approved equivalents of alternate materials.
56. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at
the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement
concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in
the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal
shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction)
aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be
achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction
operations until mix designs are approved.
57. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the
following:
A. Primary Entry (Washington Street): Right turn in, right turn out. Left
turn in and left turn out movements are restricted.
58. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs,
markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs
and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required.
59. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City
adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as
approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates
and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers.
CONSTRUCTION
60. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the
buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -
maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control
devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in
residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement
thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final
inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when
directed by the City, whichever comes first.
CC COA TTM 31348
583
0'7'7
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
LANDSCAPING
61. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks)
& 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC.
62. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention
basins, common lots and park areas.
63. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians,
retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed
landscape architect.
64. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the
Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the
Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD,
the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County
Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City
Engineer.
NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City
Engineer.
65. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the
requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized
with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs
along public streets.
PUBLIC SERVICES
66. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by
SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
67. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that
meet with the approval of the City Engineer.
58
J 078
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
WADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
68. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and
such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise
with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide
adequate construction supervision.
69. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements,
sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection
program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the
construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans,
specifications and other applicable regulations.
70. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with
reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved
by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked Record Drawing, As -
Built" or "As -Constructed" and, shall be stamped and signed by the engineer
or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings.
The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously
submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions.
MAINTENANCE
71. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160
(Maintenance), LQMC.
72. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual
maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping,
access drives, and sidewalks.
FEES AND DEPOSITS
73. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees
and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by
the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee
amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for
plan check and permits.
CC COA TTM 31348
079
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
74. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the
Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at
the time of issuance of building permit(s).
75. Prior to completion of any approval process for modification of boundaries of
the property or lots subject to these conditions, the applicant shall process a
reapportionment of any bonded assessment(s) against the property and pay
the cost of such reapportionment.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
76. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the site, the
project proponent shall submit an Oral History to the Community
Development Department and La Quinta Historical Society. The oral report
shall be prepared in accordance with the City's and the Society's standards
for such documents.
77. The applicant shall submit a revised Phase I Cultural Resources Report
regarding the regional significance of the site in terms of it's historical
context, including but not limited to, it's relationship to the Bradshaw Trail,
the stagecoach line, water wells, and prehistoric Indian villages and trails.
The Phase I Cultural Resources Report shall be completed prior to issuance
of Certificate of Occupancy and be considered independently by the Historic
Preservation Commission at a future date.
78. The applicant shall prepare a technical report on the site's eligibility for the
National Register of Historic Places.
79. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough
grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors
shall be given to City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing
permit. A final mitigation monitoring report shall be submitted to the Historic
Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
first production home for the project.
80. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
CC COA TTM 31348 080
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property.
Materials will be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and
records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
81. The applicant shall design new gates, similar to the existing gates, and
incorporate the name "Point Happy Ranch" into the gates. The applicant
shall place a plaque on, or near the gates, commemorating the site and it's
relationship to the region.
82. The applicant shall name most streets within the development after
individuals historically associated with the property.
83. Should demolition, grubbing, earth moving or construction be planned for
initiation between February 15 and September 30, a field survey shall be
conducted to determine whether birds under the jurisdiction of the Migratory
Bird Act are nesting on the property. Should such nests be identified, buffer
areas in conformance with the Act, no less than 50 feet in all directions,
shall be established where no construction activity is allowed, until such time
as the biologist determines that the nesting birds have discontinued use of
the nest. The required field survey shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of
the first permit for demolition, grubbing, grading or building on the site
84. A three person committee shall be formed, consisting of a representative of
the Homeowners' Association (HOA), a representative of the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and the Community Development
Director. The purpose of the committee shall be to assess the need for a
fence/wall to keep Peninsular Bighorn Sheep from entering the project site.
The committee shall monitor sheep activity through various means, including
interviews with residents and visitors, and any available scientific data
available and/or funded by the HOA. If bighorn sheep are seen on the project
site, the committee shall require that the HOA, at its expense, construct an
8-foot fence along the property line between the project and the hillside.
Gaps in the fence should be 11 centimeters or less. At the request of CDFG,
temporary fencing may be required between the time that sheep are seen on
the site and the time that permanent fencing is required. The committee shall
exist for a period of 10 years, unless bighorn sheep are documented to no
longer inhabit the Santa Rosa Mountains. At the end of ten (10) years, if
7-90
♦1 N
081.
CC COA TTM 31348
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 03-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31348
MADISON DEVELOPMENT, LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2003
any one member of the committee deems it necessary for the committee to
continue, it shall do so until such time that it is dissolved by a unanimous
vote of all its members.
85. The project applicant shall either provide an easement to the City, or
evidence of dedication to a non-profit organization, to be approved by the
City prior to recordation of the final map, ensuring that the preservation of
Lot 73 shall be open space in perpetuity." The lot shall also be a lettered lot
on the Final Tract Map.
86. Blasting and pile -driving, or other excessively loud construction activity, shall
be prohibited from January 1 through June 30 of each year.
87. All lighting on the project site shall be directed away from the hillsides. The
project CC&Rs shall include this prohibition for individual homeowners.
88. Plants toxic to Bighorn sheep shall be prohibited on the site. The project
proponent shall secure a clearance letter from a qualified biologist, certifying
the suitability of the plant palette for the project site. The project CC&Rs
shall include this prohibition for individual homeowners.
89. The CC&Rs for the project shall prohibit dogs from running loose in the
project site.
90. All housing units on the property shall be restricted to a single -story.
91. The CC&Rs for the project shall include a provision prohibiting access by
either persons or animals to the adjacent hillsides.
92. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a plan
demonstrating that all pesticides, fungicides, herbicides and fertilizers used
on the site, during both construction and operations, are not harmful to
wildlife. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department for review and approval.
c O 3
CC COA TTM 31348
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT SITE -
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
AVENUE
AVENUE
Oil
083
ATTACHMENT 2
PARCEL MAP Vn-2B
14/47 FMB. 12 -40
I it
I I Tit 1, 1
ly
X': IX 1::
OD
lilt I I
cf)
Tm fit IX 'I I
z
cl)
CLUJ 0 111
<
: ,I: z < olll IIIIIIIIII
W
I LU < Ill-
10 0
1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I
1
I I la: 111111111Y111111111111 /'
I t l l l l l l l l l i l :11l I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
!;III 11111fillf lilt
1111Y111111 11111111111 111 111111
1
III,IIIIIIIIIIIItllllllll,l�lllllll /,�
tW3,',4r( IS? 31•
EXISTM TRACT 21-177
I
to
F�G,a
u!l
0,
4C
=am PALMS OprIot
IY
0
PLACE
SAM
P LACE
-
uu
- - - - - - -- - - j
TF,
PALMS
PLACE
'woo
aY
I
�
084
TOV-W& - -r - -
pl-
ATTACHMENT 3
PARCEL MAP V02B
pAE, 124/47-40
lo
Wit I I I I I I
4L
10
OD t
WMI 111 11 1 lilt IIIIIIIIII
0 fill 11111111 11:11111111111111111111
11 1 1 1 If I if
IIIIII till IIIIIIIIIII:f"I
U. z III I
lll::::Illlllf
to lilt I
0. it
lilt IIIII.Al I IN
I 11111 131, (1):: it 11:11
W < 11 lilt '11
< lilt
till]] lilt
fill I
l II
1 1 1 1
l ,
:IIIi1IIIII
IIf
I i ,I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I.1 I I /j l //
, f
It III -I fill
Illtllt,IliIlt
IIIIIIIIII
I lilt
lilt I
xll
II 1
1: IIX
10
EXISSTW7 TRACT "1171
71
PALM Gflfrlgr_�_
MACE
lop-A0
85
ATTACHMENT 5
4
�a�w
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jerry Herman, Community Development Director
FROM: 16imoth Jonasson Public Works Director/CityEngineer
DATE: December 11, 2003
RE: Point Happy Ranch, Tentative Tract 31148
Engineering staff has worked with the developer of the subject development and have
identified three (3) additional access alternatives for City Council consideration. The
access alternatives, or options, are as follows:
Option 1 — The Original Proposal: Access driveway to tract is centered in tract
frontage on Washington Street with a 100-foot long deceleration lane.
Option 2 — Access driveway to tract is taken from a newly reconfigured intersection
where Singing Palms Drive intersects Washington Street with a 200 foot long
deceleration lane and a traffic signal.
Option 3 — Access driveway to tract is taken from a reconfigured frontage road
alignment near the southerly portion of tract frontage on Washington Street with a 200-
foot long deceleration lane.
Option 4 — Access driveway to tract is taken from a reconfigured/combined access road
to Plaza La Quinta with a 150-foot deceleration lane.
Recommended Option
From a traffic circulation and traffic safety perspective, all three of the newly identified
alternatives are considered better than the original access alternative presented by the
developer, but Option #2 solves more traffic circulation and traffic safety issues than
the other options. As is typically the case, the best costs the most. Staff estimates
that Option #2 will cost approximately $1,000,000 more than Option #1 which was the
developer's original proposal. Additionally, in order to implement Option #2, a General
Plan Amendment will have to be adopted allowing a signalized intersection to be
placed 920 feet south of Highway 111, instead of the current spacing allowed by the
General Plan which is 1,060 feet. Staff considers this option to be superior because
the City is making signal coordination improvements to the signals on Washington
between Miles Avenue and Avenue 47.
r
087
TAPROJECT DEVELOPMENT DIVISIOMDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS%COA & CORRESPONDENCSTRACT MAPS131348%RECOMMENDATION.DOC
It should also be noted that Option#2 will take longer to implement than the other
options, approximately six (6) month longer than Option#1. Two properties with homes
would have to be acquired by the developer in order to implement this option. This
would involve negotiations, buying the homes, and relocation of the existing residents.
If the residents were unwilling to sell their homes voluntarily, the City could consider
exercising the right of eminent domain, since the area at issue would become a public
street. The proposed Conditions of Approval must place all burdens of the acquisition
on the developer. The City would want the developer to execute an agreement similar
to the one used for the extension of La Quinta Drive ensuring that the City would bear
no expense as a result of the acquisition. If the developer is unable to acquire the
property via good faith negotiation, the City Council will consider eminent domain
proceedings at the developer's expense. However, the City may not commit to
exercising eminent domain. The Council would make that determination only after
completing several procedural steps and deciding whether or not to adopt a Resolution
of Necessity. If the City Council declines to exercise its powers of eminent domain, the
developer is by state law relieved of the requirement to construct the off -site
improvement, and is allowed to proceed with a "default" alternative. Thus, it is
important to identify a default alternative that would become effective if the property
needed for the roadway is not acquired within the required time set forth in the
Subdivision Map Act.
The Default Alternative (requires no property to be acquired)
Engineering staff considers Option#3 to be the second best alternative. It provides
improved traffic safety compared to Option#1, the original proposal, but does not
provide the quality of traffic circulation that Option#2, the recommended option,
provides. Option #3, the default option, forces all Point Happy Ranch residents exiting
the Washington Street access to turn right on the frontage road and proceed south to
Highland Palms Drive where the residents can then gain direct access to Washington
Street at that signalized intersection.
Attachments:
1.
Option#1
2.
Option #2
3.
Option #3
4.
Option #4
5.
Comparison Analysis of Options
T:IPROJECT DEVELOPMENT DIVISION\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSICOA & CORRESPONDENCEITRACT MAPS313481RECOMMENDATION.DOC
O
N
>►
.�
A
_ 1-7Zc �_
c� O N N •> N
A CcC
C O
0)V
V
.v to V O >,
C
o
Z
I
� -
�,�cCM c�c
'��
z,
c
S
O
0)
N
c
N
CD4)04 C
'0 _ > O
m
�_��
cc
o
v
c
o
—
•� rnoao
�Oa�.4
r'v
r>
O
z
0
o�on.�c
0- EoE
0
Z
oaoo
Zoc�4
...0
O �
M
C4
O C
M
rno
cc
Lm0
_
•>'�
o
O
O
N
ccCIO�
O to
� co
■�
Z
N
C
O O 2
L
L
L
N yam+
L
ca
coca
•cc M :3 CM
L
0)w
L-
2
e •p
0
L
t Ca
O�
E N
V
c>
V$
C>
V
c>
O
Z
O
Z
O a p
Zocv
N
V
L
��cc
O
H
O
�L
C
2
cM
��
��'u,
a
p
Z
N
CD oE
co
a�
m
u.
c
�do
0O
:: t -v
N
0
rnN>,
c
U)
o
U)
o v)
o
t
°
rU)US
•E �
�
�o
�c�
°= o.
o°
aU
o
am
Z
�a)
W �2 =
cN
Z 8
Ed
E3:
aci
o
M
N
> O
C O
rcm
0
cc
0
0
p
M0
A'
W
>.0
,Nr
\
cc
L
W- cc
�
N
O
N
O
N
.c
O
i
a)C
N
cc
O
U
C
ca
C
cc
C U) o
�' 0)
C)
V
V
V O Ccc Cc
5>
o
Z
�>
o
Z
0
Z
oao0
Z o Z
o
a)
c
o
N
°
.n
E
0
cD
Cc c
N O
O
:E 3
N
> to
ca c
O
.o
O o N
-o cn
C
O
W
00o
c�8o
L
pE
anaCDEi�o�N
cc
u)pL
E
�
o
co
4- p
O
O
> Cc..-
U O
a
E
'�
CY
.�V
o�o�E2cca�
r
t
cm r L
Cl) G. C
O
a
cu
°
°
(n CO
CVcm
N L
N
c l M:5
�N
E�
Ccc
C
O
O
E
nV
a) �
(n
cc
J
cc
Q
O
C
C CD
C
Cc O O
L
cm
LL
o�2c
03
Gl
[I=
E
U)
cu
CM N
;�
fl j
a
a
•_Ina- co O N
c�
Qp
o c
cc
XE=0c>
a3oXrn�o
15
Nca��Q�•�oai
1�c
L �voiv�
_
rn
W -5
���0c°�E
ago-c�v�E
o�
�N
'30�
o 0 0
_
•� O >;
�0LOccc
rn O a
V% +"'
o m
o 0.0o�
Q L
•p c� N
0
c
a�cm
en 9�cv
N
c. en.
mE
(=j Ea�E
_
O Vi —Cc 0
L 7
•C
>- p
Lo
?- cc J •v E
Z
a� cr o on
� p
z :E cv c
?-
o
•'�
ca
ccv -v
Elm0
vi ca »� cn
a Q N E
> '~ E
L Q -
0 cc
>+ C L C—
>,o O;o c.
a�
�N C C
h o oa O
= L
�'' y- a
�cNo
v)
c
O V --
o`'vcc
cpo
o cn�
cL,4o—__ N C
_
cEi»»��
a)12
Co
O
z
O
z
o�=.cc
c
z
�c��rna?
o E i S-
�
} a.t-
a v o cn
¢
+
(1) —
o�
c c
cy= c
Q
0
C
cQ c 'v�
L O
a �
cc L Q
a � o. cc
E
,o
0
= 0
o E
a�� 3 0
E oa
�.. � c
`o
c �� c•N �
o v c a�
c
3 c
N��c
cc
a
o E
0-00 vo
L
N
L
-p 1
C 0 .../ '�
cc
0 cU N
z
V7
E
N
Q Eo
'v�aE�'
zQaa�
a�
��
op
LAm — N
C
o
cc an a�`n
E
i
Q �E
0-10
oC
= L
>+ �cc
O v- �.+ a
N C
N c
N
U
•O.
C
O cA
C O
C L N C
(a enfl.
O E
cQ
0
O
>-
z
acc
�ou_
c
D
z
}z
-v
•v
-v
cc
o
cc
CM
cc-4)
T
o
a s
r
c CL �.
..�.
.0
a°�
V
N
E
r
,
o
•Ccr
MMa
a)
3
'v
E
3°
acc°�C
•°�
cc c
E
%
E
O
c
>
•Q.
Q
c
cc
-'
a)
O
C
o4)
i
no
0 0�U
p
)O
U
N
C0
o >
MI) cc
Ca
W
O
4.0 •
y
.C.
LL)
occ
c�y
N�c
:6E
0O
caci
of
cn�ge
tca)
°'rn
oc
�c'N
o�c
so
_ccE
E
���
L�
30
�Ea
��
C�
'�E
��Q
��
2ai�
�:�
Uc
r-, -4
090 4
a)
c 0 O
N
L
E c rn
o
> s V
E
N
CD 0y O � ET2
cc
°'
E
oit-wEsocL
2
c � ''' '�'' �+
E
ago
�+NQiL"=a�(c
Q� C inN
X
ccCD
-0, �O
N
O
a
N
2 a) o o N
>- m m 0-0 .U. c 3
Q
M
>- to
a�
.r
cc
E
'x
0
ao
ao
ai
`� O
N
c
z
c o
�LO
«• c Z,
Z o O N
cc N U -v y. , .n N >4'
�+
t� E�c��Co
L y.r
ai
x
oE0c��0:=a) c
cc
E
20
0.0
O O�'p O .C�
r
'xL
00
cQ _+ N
o E cc
v >'� E >'�
L ...
no'.c
O
�o
z¢.5Q E 00�� mC
Q E
4-1
a�
U
a
ai
o
co
z
0
z
c..
c
o
O
.o
O
3
>
c
O
cn
>
.c
E
0 �
E c
a>
a �.
o
a
o
a
0
.E
_
� V
c o
O N
O
cc
c I"a
E
O
o. (U
p�
ca c
C
o
O
.c0
EE
0
a
An
O
Uccc
03
=E
.-
N
091.
l'-•-ate
9
I» 1 .0 1 a I • I^ I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I
I
I
092
I
w
!i
•
I " 1 10 1 - I ' I '*' I «k 1l I
�
I I
i
r
I I I I I
�, I ----- I i I
0 fi
a a I a I » I a
:O S i
lol1
0
I w
«
M
r
a
•
�
� r
ate
\ I
I I
/
a
—
\
p
/ I
IL
I I
I I 1
094
L
......... .
all
fill
095
ATTACH MENT 6
2 ko 03
h ,f
Ck
ILI
096
Li `l e0 PC,- t r
L-(A- �clz-lw
f 11 - l�Tt0/J-
,1
097
12/10/2003 02:36 7605646208 BRODT
PAGE 01
Caren Brodt Dec. 11, 2003.
7"95 Singing Paints Drive.
- La Quints, CA 92253
Jerry Hemm: Director of Community Developmwnt Department
Timothy Jonasson: Director of Public Wort
Mayor Don Adolph
La Qulnta City Council
Deer Sirs:
As a long tints homeowner In the quiet, beautiful and secluded neighborhood
south of Point Happy Ranch, I must voice my concerns In the light of the negative
impact I foresee on our community In view of the proposed b a fight at the and
of our street.
At the April U. 2N3 meeting, the developer stated his desire for a signal tight to
be installed at the end of Singing Palm: Dr., creating an intersection between
Singing Palms Dr., Washington St., and Simon Dr. Madison Development seems
to consider this a necessary aspect of their project. We as citizens of La Quanta,
for over 12 years, feel that a light Installed at this juncture will cause an
Irreparable impact on our quiet neighborhood.
I anticipate the foilowirM probable impact:
Gridlock. batween proposed new intersection and Hwy. 11.1
Increase of 6411c funneling into our currently secluded neighborhood
may eause these reit ts:
Likely increase in crime due to direct conduit created between our
small neighborhood and Hwy 111 and Washington
Could make streets unsafe for our children and pets
May accelerate wear and tear of our streets
Possible decrease property values
Diminished quality of life for our residents
We are asking you as our city representatives, to seriously consider our concerns
and our desire to keep our neighborhood safe and secluded. I consider this to be
098
12/10/2003 02:36 7605646208 BRODT PAGE 02
an exceptional neighborl ood, one for which It would behoove the community of
La Quinta to protect and preserve for Ita historic, aest#Wic. and ecological value.
if the proposed two c light Is deemed necessary by the city and local developers,
and we have no choice in the matter, we would ask you to seriously consider the
option of a gate at the end of our street. Because of fire and police requirements,
we know that the gate would require emergency access, this would be, amenable
to us.
We appreciate your hard work on our behalf as, you try your best to satisfy the
city's needs as it grows and proliferates, both commercially and privately. In our
eagerness to expand, let us not overlook the significance of our community as a
whole.
Thank You for Your Consideration,
_ ._
P-dua
_.0
Caren & Victor Brodt
/; -//- 4oij
099
12/11/2020 08:34
11 1tDit _ PAGE 02
ATTENTION:
John & Adeline Hendriks
46-555 Cameo Palms Drive
L.aQuinta Ca. 92253
December 11s' 2003
Jerry Herman: Director of Community Development Depart,
Timothy Jonasson: Director Of Public Works
Mayor Don Adolph
LaQuinta City Council
Dear Sirs:
As a very concerned homeowner in this very quiet, secluded and beautiful
neighborhood south of Point Happy, I must voice my concerns regarding the
negative impact, that I feel will result from the proposed traffic light at the end of
Singing Palms Drive.....
I feel this traffic light would create more traffic through our streets..decrease our
property values... diminish the quality of life we all enjoy here at present. If this
development MUST go through..we request that Singing Palms Drive be closed
ot%.completely... and we as residents here continue to use the Highland Street and
Washington Street as our egress.....and therefore entrance.
The closing of Singing Palms ..with a gate for emergency vehicles is very possible..
Please consider this alternative. Thank You
Sincere ...
Adeline Hen riks n Hendriks
100