SP 84-004 - CC RES 98-47 Recorded 1998 TD Desert Dev - Amendment 2
, ~ .
. t 238064
,...
,
'
. .. RECEIVED
PLEASE COMPlETE THIS INFORMATION '98 JUL 9 Hi'll! Lt9
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
AND ~DED ""'L TD' CITY OF LA QUINTA RECEIVED FOR RECORD
CITY CLERK ATa:oo AM
~~~ .JUN.1'O.1~98....
:==:u
f~ (J ~ ~ ¿50 tf
A8c0rder .
~ l M /(;;¡ F888 $
53 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY 0
~9~~7 f!J
Title of Document
THIS AREA FOR
R£ CORDER'S
..
USE ONL1l'
THIS PAGE ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION
($3.00 Additional Recording Fee Applies)
STC-SCSD 996a (Rev 8/97)
,
.
238064
. . RESOLUTION 98-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINT A, CALIFORNIÁ, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 84-
004, AMENDMENT NO.2
CASE NO. SP 84-004, AMENDMENT NO.2
APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on
the 19th day of May, 1998, hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing to consider Specific
Plan Amendment No.2 to a mixed use development consisting of a combination of
residential, golf course, tourist commercial and retail uses on 726 acres, generally
bounded by four Arterial streets; Washington Street, Jefferson Street, Avenue 48, and
Avenue 50. The project ar~a is loc¡sted at the south of Avenue 48, north of Avenue
50, west of Jefferson Street and east of Washington Street, more particularly
described as:
APN: ,OOK 646, MAPS 2, and 43 through 40;
AND BPOK 649 MAPS 10,21,37,38, and 40
WHEREAS, .he Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California,
did, on the 28th day of APril, 1998, hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing to consider
Specific Plan Amendmert No.2 to a mixed use development consisting of a
combination ofresidential¡, golf course, tourist commercial and retail uses on 726
acres, generally bounded by four Arterial streets; Washington Street, Jefferson Street,
Avenue 48, and Avenue 50.
.,
WHEREAS,'~aid Specific Plan Amendment No.2 has complied with .the
requirements of the Califbrnia EnvironmentalOuality Act of 1 970 (as amended),
pursuant to the adoptiori of Resolution 83-68 by the City Council, in that the
Community Development Director has conducted an Initial Study (EA 98-357),
reviewed a previously certified Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 90 for
Specific Plan 84-004 and determined that the Specific Plan Amendment No.2 will not
have a significant adver$e impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of Environmel1tallmpact is recommended; and,
WHEREAS" at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and argumentst if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approving said
Specific Plan Amendment No.2.
A :\CCRESOSPB4-004amdNo.2