Loading...
2004 08 17 CCCity Council Agendas are Available on the City's Web Page @ www.la-quinta.org CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday, August 17, - 2:00 P.M. Beginning Resolution No. 2004-088 Ordinance No.409 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Council Members: Henderson, Osborne, Perkins, Sniff, and Mayor Adolph PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CLOSED SESSION NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. In addition, persons identified as negotiating parties are not invited into the Closed Session meeting when the Agency is considering acquisition of real property. 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, MARTINEZ V. CITY OF LA QUINTA, ET. AL., U.S. DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COURT CASE NO. CV 04-06373 DT (RZx), PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) i City Council Agenda 1 August 17, 2004 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b) - THREAT OF LITIGATION (ONE MATTER). RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form should be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council beginning consideration of that item. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA PRESENTATIONS - NONE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE - NONE APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 20, 2004 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 3, 2004 CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED AUGUST 17, 2004. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED JUNE 30, 2004. City Council Agenda 2 August 17, 2004 } 3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED JUNE 30, 2004. 4. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE RECREATION SUPERVISOR TO ATTEND THE CERTIFIED PLAYGROUND SAFETY INSPECTOR COURSE IN LA PALMA, CALIFORNIA, SEPTEMBER 22-24, 2004. 5. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE FOREMAN TO ATTEND THE CERTIFIED PLAYGROUND SAFETY INSPECTOR COURSE IN LA PALMA, CALIFORNIA, SEPTEMBER 22-24, 2004. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH SPECIFIC PLAN 96-027, PARCEL MAP NO. 28573, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-028, THE HOME DEPOT, CREDIT SUISSE LEASING 92A, L.P. 7. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER TO ATTEND THE APWA INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA, SEPTEMBER 12-15, 2004. 8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT FOR TRACT MAP NO. 31379, LEGACY VILLAS, CENTEX HOMES. 9. APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO THE RECREATION ACTIVITIES COORDINATOR JOB DESCRIPTION. 10. APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO SIERRA LANDSCAPE, INC. TO CONSTRUCT THE HIGHWAY 111 LANDSCAPE MODIFICATIONS ADJACENT TO, LG'S STEAKHOUSE, PROJECT NO. 2004-01. 11. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGER TO ATTEND "EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT EARTHQUAKE COURSE" GIVEN BY THE CALIFORNIA SPECIALIZED TRAINING INSTITUTE IN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, SEPTEMBER 12-17, 2004. 12. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO UTILIZE THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR TRAINING OF ELECTION OFFICERS FOR THE NOVEMBER PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2004, 9:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. 13. APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE FUNDING FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION ON WASHINGTON STREET IN CONNECTION WITH PROJECT NO. 2004-02. City Council Agenda 3 August 17, 2004 3 14. APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS ON AVENIDA BERMUDAS, AND PUBLIC SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — LA QUINTA UNIT. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY APPLICATIONS AND METHOD OF RECOGNITION. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING STREET NAME CHANGES FROM VIA CC TO VIA MONTECITO AND VIA DD TO VIA MALLORCA: AND LA QUINTA PARTNERS. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD 2004/2005 WORK PLAN. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST BY LA QUINTA COUNTRY CLUB TO INCLUDE THE COST OF OLEANDER REMOVAL IN THE PREVIOUSLY -APPROVED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY LANDSCAPING ALONG EISENHOWER DRIVE AND AVENUE 50. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 5. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 408 REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO A MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION - ZONE CHANGE 2004-120 — RJT HOMES, CODORNIZ LLC. A. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 408 ON SECOND READING STUDY SESSION — NONE City Council Agenda 4 August 17, 2004 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (HENDERSON) 2. CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS 3. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 4. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 5. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 6. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 7. JACQUELINE COCHRAN REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (OSBORNE) 8. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (HENDERSON) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION (ROBERT TYLER) 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (HENDERSON) 13. SAN JACINTO/SANTA ROSA NATIONAL MONUMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (ADOLPH) 15. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR JULY 7, 2004. 16. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JUNE 17, 2004. 17. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JULY 13, AND JULY 27, 2004. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS B. CITY COUNCIL SUMMER MEETING SCHEDULE 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS B. MEETING SCHEDULE FOR JOINT CITY COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETING 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2004 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2004 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT JULY, 2004 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - NONE 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR JULY, 2004 9. POLICE CHIEF'S MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2004 10. FIRE CHIEF'S QUARTERLY REPORT MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS — NONE RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECESS TO 7:00 P.M. City Council Agenda 5 August 17, 2004 9 7-nn p_nn_ PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the time clock on the speakers podium. PRESENTATIONS 1. YMCA STUDENT ARTWALL PRESENTATION. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. Any person may submit written comments to the La Quinta City Council before a public hearing may appear and be heard in. support of, or in opposition to, the approval of project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing. 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY OF ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 80-025 VISTA GRANDE, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA (APN 649-142-001) FOR JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, PROJECT NO. 2000-19. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY OF ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY ALONG JEFFERSON STREET, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA (APN 649-090-010, 649-090-01 1, 649-080-013, 649-071-010) FOR JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, PROJECT NO. 2009-19. A. RESOLUTION ACTION City Council Agenda 6 August 17, 2004 6 3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY OF ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILES AVENUE AND JEFFERSON STREET, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA (APN 604-493-014 AND 604-493-015) FOR JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, PROJECT NO. 2000-19. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 4. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION: 1) CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ASSESSMENT 2004-508; AND 2) APPROVING TENTATIVE MAP 32279 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF 9.71 ACRES INTO 31 SINGLE FAMILY AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS LOTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 58, 2,100 ± FEET WEST OF MADISON STREET. APPLICANT: DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 5. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32068, THE SUBDIVISION OF 4 ACRES INTO 12 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MANDARINA, 200 ± FEET WEST OF POMELO WITHIN THE CITRUS. APPLICANT: MARVIN INVESTMENTS. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 6. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS TO: 1) CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-480; AND 2) APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31087, A 19-LOT SUBDIVISION ON ± 5.0 ACRES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DARBY ROAD, ± 1 /4 MILE EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET. APPLICANT: TAHITI PARTNERS V. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 7. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS TO: .1) CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-495; AND 2) APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31852, A 14-LOT SUBDIVISION ON ± 8.47 ACRES ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND MADISON STREET. APPLICANT: EHLINE COMPANY. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 7 City Council Agenda 7 August 17, 2004 ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council to be held on September 21, 2004, commencing with closed session at 2:00 p.m. and open session at 3:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, August 17, 2004, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, August 13, 2004. DATED: August 13, 2004 JUNE S. GREEK, CIVIC, City erk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7025, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangement should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 PM session or the 7:00 PM session. City Council Agenda 8 August 17, 2004 COUNCEURDA MEETING DATE: AUGUST 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated August 17, 2004 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR / STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated August 17, 2004 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 59656 - 596961 320,398.37 59697 - 597131 85,595.53 59714 - 59719) 7,134.78 Wire Transfers} 257,038.49 P/R 32226 - 322521 1453,164.22 P/R Tax Transfers} 3%763.64 Payable Warrants: 59720 - 598381 191925541.40 $2,047,636.43 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash - City Demand of Cash -RDA VX41A_"._ Falconer, Finade Director $1,8121639.25 $234,997.18 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 7/28/04 - 8/11/04 7/28/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $39,635.00 7/28/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $14,119.94 7/28/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $33,330.00 7/28/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $32,057.97 7/28/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $27,607.00 7/30/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $15,000.00 7/30/04 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $13,683.52 8/03/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $26,000.00 8/06/04 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS - HEALTH INSURANCE $49,464.02 8 /09/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $2,141.04 8 /09/04 WIRE TRANSFER - VISTA DUNES $4,000.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $257,038.49 10 Pil PR-EPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 PROGRAM: GM346L CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NO NO NAME i------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VOUCHER NO P.O. DATE NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL 59720 1061 AIYA! INC 000487 08/12/2004 101.-4001-415.56-02 237.83 i 237.83 * 237.83 59721 202 ALCALA, BOB 000371 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 14.00 14.00 * 14.00 59722 129 ARCH WIRELESS 000372 08/12/2004 101\4602-415.41-25 712.70 712.70 * 712.70 59723 17 AVAYA INC 0003.73 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.43-28 1,214.54 1,214.54 * 1,214.54 59724 18 BANG INC, DAVE 000374 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.72-10 6,448.31 000375 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.72-10 4,569.02 000376 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.72-10 957.48 11,974.81 * 11,974.81 59725 9 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR 000377 08/12/2004 401-1.723-551.32-10 7,620.00 000378 08/12/2004 101'-7002-431.33-34 680.11 000379 08/12/2004 101-70.02-431.33-34 1,462.50 000380 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 450.00 000381 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 3,412.50 000382 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 225.00 000383 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 562.50 000384 -08/12/2.004 101-7002-431.33-34 450.00 000385 08/12/2004- 101-7002-431.33-34 750.00 000386 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 562.50 000387 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 750.00 000388 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 450.00 000389 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 750.00 000390 08/12/2004 101-7002=431.33-34 1,800.00 000391 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 2,437.50 i 000392 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 1,200.00 000393 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 900.00 000394 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 5,362.50 000395 .08/12Z2004 101'-7002-431.33-34 600.00 000396 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 600.00 000397 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 900.00 000398 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 900.00 000399 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 750.00 000400 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 450.00 000,401 08/12/2004 101-1002-431.33-34 31900.00 000402 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 1,950.00. 000485 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 448.45 40,323.56 * 40,323.56 59726 19 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 000403 000404 08/12/2004 08/12/2004 101-5008-419.44-07 101-7003-431.44-07 5.68 59.00 000405 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.44-07 6.81 71.49 * 71.49 PREPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 2 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=----------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59727 303 CALIF PARK & RECREATION S 000407 08/12/2004 101--3001-451.53-03 140.00 000408 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.53-03 145.00 285.00 * 285.00 59728 782 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE & DE 000406 08/12/2004 401-1739-551.32-10 5,010.00 5,010.00 * 5,010.00 59729 130 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 000488 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.51-31 110.54 000489 08/12/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 10.32 000490 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.45-01 8.82 000491 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.51-31 66.60 000492 08/12/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 20.32 000493 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.45-01. 42.83 259.43 * 259.43 59730 132 CALIFORNIA POOLS 000409 08/12/2004 101-5008-419.43-81 107.00 107.00 * 107.00 59731 106 CANON 000410 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.43-19 327.97 000411 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.43-19 26.68 000412 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.43-19 3,737.94 000413 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.43-19 655.94 4,748.53 * 4,748.53 59732 20 CAPUTO, ROSEMARY HEIM 000414 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 70.00 70.00 * 70.00 59733 237 CARDIFF LIMOUSINE 000415 08/12/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 189.00 000416 08/12/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 189.00 378.00 * 378.00 59734 238 CARLO-CASELLAS, JAIME 000417 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 189.00 180.00 * 189.00 59735 947 CASSEL, LLORA 000418 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 126.00 126.00 * 126.00 59736 22 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 000494 68/12/2004 502-0000-512.56-02 63.58 63.58 * 63.58 59737 23 CHECKMATE EXCHANGE 000419 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.56-02 69.29 69.29 * 69.29 59738 140 COACHELLA VALLEY PRINTING 000420 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.53-01 156.2-4 156.24 * 156'.24 59739 206 COMPUTER U 000421 08/12/2004 101-3002-451..33-43 468.75 468.75 * 468.75 59740 210 DAHLIN GROUP ARCHITECTURE 000422 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 4,750.00 PREPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER ACCOUNTING PERIOD PAGE 3 ' 2005/02 PROGRAM: GN346L REPORT NUMBER 13 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--- NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT CNET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59740 210 DAHLIN GROUP ARCHITECTURE 000423 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 1,051.82 51801.82 * 5,801.82 59741 475 DATAPRINT CORPORATION 000424 08/12/2004 101-5001-424.56-01 45.89 45.89 * 45.89 59742 112 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 000425 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-31 455.00 455.00 * 455.00 59743 1055 DESERT ISLES 000426 08/12/2004 101-1000-321.00-00 45.00 45.00 * 45.00 59744 27 DESERT PERSONNEL SVC INC 000427 08/12/2004 101-4001-415.10-05 696.00 000428 08/12/2004 101-5002-424.10-05 1,012.78 000429 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.32-10 835.20 000430 08/12/2004 101-4001-415.10-05 295.80 000431 08/12/2004 101-5002-424'.10-05 1,025.60 3,865.38 * 3,865.38 59745 73 DESERT PHOTO LAB 000432 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 27.00 000433 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 11.57 000434 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 15.42 000435 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 7.71 000436 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 15.43 000437 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 31.55 000438 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 21.03 000439 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 25.45 000440 08/12./2004 101-7006-431.34-04 13.70 000441 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 45.94 000442 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 19.69 234.49 * 234.49 59746 307 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHO 000443 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-16 11,851.92 11,851.92 * 11,851.92 59747 211 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 000444 08/12/2004 101-1004-413.55-01 278.27 278.27 * 278.27 59748 363 DIAMOND RINGERS SOFTBALL 000445 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 1,500.00 1,500.00 * 1,500.00 59749 28 DOUGLAS, LES 000446 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 655.20 655.20 * 655.20 59750 389 DUNHAM, KATHY 000447 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 970.20 970.20 * 970.20 59751 309 ELMS EQUIPMENT RENTAL INC 000448 08/12/2004 101-7003-431.44-01 1,088.06 1108.8.06 * 1,088.06 ul G.J PREPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 4 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59752 1056 ENDICOTT ENTERPRISES 000449 08/12/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 192.93 192.93 * 192.93 59753 29 EVANS & ASSOCIATES INC, D 000450 08/12/2004 401-1733-551.35-07 11,254.66 000451 08/12/2004 401-1740-551.35-07 2,162.52 13,417.18 * 13,417.18 59754 576 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTAT 000452 08/12/2004 101-5001-424.34-04 166.64 166.64 * 166.64 59755 31 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 000453 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.56-27 56.68 000495 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.56-27 232.05 288.73 * 288.73 59756 1057 FISHER CONSTRUCTION INC, 000457 08/12/2004 10176000-343.12-00 5.00 5.00 * 5.00 59757. 366 FRANKLIN COVEY 000454 08/12/2004 101-7003-431.56-02 85.65 000455 08712/2004 101-70037431.56-02 25.85- 59.80 * 59.80 59758 756 FRIENDS OF THE DESERT MOU 000456 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 1,000.00 1,000.00 * 1,000.00 59759 276 GATEWAY BUSINESS 000496 08/12/2004 502-0000-512.71-01 10,365.07 000497 08/12/2004 502-0000-512.71-01 21656.89 13,021.96 * 13,021.96 59760 1058 GDI COMMUNICATIONS INC 000458 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.43-67 5,408.00 5,408.00 * 5,408.00 59761 367 GENOVESE, THOMAS P 000459 08/12/2004 101-1002-413.51-01 71.33 71.33 * 71.33 59762 243 HEINBUCH GOLF 000460 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 20,710.00 20,710.00 * 20,710.00 59763 1059 HENSLEY, REGENIA 000461 08/12/2004 101-2001-411.51-01 29.95 29.95 * 29.95 59764 1060 HOKE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING 000462 08/12/2004 101-1000-321.00-00 50.00 50.00 * 50.00 59765 36 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 000463 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.56-52 224.22 000464 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.56-52 329.29 000465 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.56-52. 238.71 792.22 * 792.22 59766 540 HOOPER, FAYE 000466 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 90.00 90.00 * 90.00 1 A PREPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER _ PAGE 5 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO-BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO NO ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL ---- 59767 179 HTE INC 000498 08/12/2004 502-0000-512.56-25 3,000.00 000499 08/12/2004 502-0000-51.2.56-25 600.00 3,600.00 * 3,600.00 59768 988 INDIO SHOE STORE INC 000467 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.56-40 310.32 000468 08/12/2004 101-7003-431.56-40 191.74 502.06 * 502.06 59769 144 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 000469 08/12/2004 101-1003-413.51-01 390.00 - 000470 08/12/2004 405-9001-702.51-01 455.00 000471 08/12/2004 406-9002-702.51-01 455.00 000472 08/12/2004_ 101-1003-413.51-01 150.00 000473 08/12/2004 405-9001-702.51-61 175.00 000474 08/12/2004 40679002-702.51-01 175.00 1,800.00 * 1,800.00 59770 923 J & H ASSET PROPERTY NANA 000475 08/12/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 6,276.51 6,276.51 * 6,276.51 59771 194 JACOBS, STEVEN 000476 08/12/2004 101-3003-451.33-43 227.50 000477 08/12/2004 91.00 .101-3003-451.33-43 318.50 * 318.50 59772 374 JOBS AVAILABLE 000478 08/12/2004 101-1004-413.55-01 92.00 92.00 * 92.00 59773 77 JONASSON, TIN 000479 08/12/2004 101-7001-431.51-01 37.13 37.13 * 37.13 59774 196 KEITH COMPANIES, THE 000480 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 17,172.00 000481 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 25,635.93 42,807.93 * 42,807.93 59775 79 KINER GOODSELL INC 000482 08/12/2004 101-1003-413.55-07 3,000.00 3,000.00 * 3,000.00 59776 865 KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION, BRUC 000483 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.32-07 3,040.00 000484 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.45-01 240.00 000486 08712/2004 101-7005-431.32-07 600.00 3,880.00 * 3,880.00 59777 867 La Quinta Arts-261075 -08/12/2004 101-0000-228.10-00 28,330.00 28,330.00 * 28,330.00 59778 394 LANDMARK GEO-ENGINEERS & 000500 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 449.50 449.50 * 449.50 59779 1062 LIVING DESERT, THE 000502 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 1'000.00 1,000.00 * 1,000.00 J PREPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 6 PROGRAM: GN346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO --------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO ------------- NO ---- -------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 5.9780 800 M-S CASH DRAWER CORPORATI 000503 08/12/2004 502-0000-512.56-02 76.03 76.03 * 76.03 59781 220 MARSHALL, SALLY 000504 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 429.10 429.10 * 429.10 59782 1063 MC CALLUM THEATRE 000505 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 2,000.00 1 2,000.00 * 2,000.00 59783 221 MC DOWELL AWARDS 000506 08/12/2004 101-2001-411.53-01 169.28 169.28 * 169.28 59784 184 MC HURRY INC 000507 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 16,111.00 16,111.00 * 16,111.00 59785 1064 MD SOLUTIONS 000508 08/12/2004 101-5056-425.33-43 220.00 220.00 * 220.00 59786 250 NAI CONSULTING INC 000509 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.32-10 706.84 000510 08/12/2004 101-7003-431.32-07 1,123.84 000511 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.32-07 541.66 000512 08/12/2004 401-1710-551.32-10 95.00 000513 08/12/2004 401-1714-551.32-10 1,549.41 000514 08/12/2004 401-1722-551.32-10 .95.00 000515 08/12/2004 401-1726-551.32-10 995.00 000516 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.35-07 190.00 000517 08/12/2004 401-1733-551.32-10 682.32 000518 08/12/2004 401-1734-551.35-07 271.34 000519 08/12/2004 401-1736-551.32-10 110.72 000520 08/12/2004 401-1740-551.32-10 212.50 000521 08/12/2004 405-9001-702.55-07 1,927.50 000522 08/12/2004 401-1.739-551.32-10 117.50 8,618.63 * 8,618.63 59787 .40 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 000523 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.41-25 2,208.80 2,208.80 * 2,208.80 59788 1065 NIETO, RUBEN 000524 08/12/2004 501-0000-511.43-43 367.00 367.00 * 367.00 59789 60 NOLEN INC, TRULY 000611 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.42-20 75.00 000612 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.43-62 34.00 109.00 * 109.00 59790 41 OFFICE DEPOT 000525 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.5.6-07 442.85 000526 08/12/2004 101-1002-413.56-01 27.55 000527 08/12/2004 101-4001-415.56-01 7.73 000528 08/12/2004 101-1002-413.56-01 53.51 000529 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.56-07 147.62 000530 08/12/2004 101-2001-411.56-01 33.10 PREPARED%12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 7 PROGRAM: GMM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WELLS FARGO BANK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59790 41 OFFICE DEPOT 000531 08/12/2004 101-1002-413.56-01 7.95 000532 08/12/2004 101-1002-413.56-01 8.28- 712.03 * 712.03 59791 187 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER 000533 08/12/2004 401-1710-551.32-10 1,430.00 000534 08/12/2004 401-1710-551.32-10 2,175.00 3,605.00 * 3,605.00 59792 962 PARK BILLING CO INC 000536 08/12/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 69.75 69.75 * 69.75 59793 835 PARTNERSHIP TO PRESERVE 1000537 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 429.80 429.80 * 429.80 59794 1066 PC MAGAZINE 000538 08/12/2004 502-0000-512.53-04 34.97 34.97 * 34.97 59795 837 PINNACLE DESIGN COMPANY 000539 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 79,016.36 79,016.36 * 79,016.36. 59796 186 PITNEY BOWES 000540 08/12/2004 101-4002-415.43-16 1,366.00 1,366.00 * 1,366.00 59797 552 PLANNING CENTER INC, THE 000545 08/12/2004 101-6002-463.32-10 6,319.39 000546 08/12/2004 101-6002-463.32-10 575.35 6,894.74 * 6,894.74 59798 839 POWER PLUS 000542 08/12/2004 101-7606-431.41-30 25.00 25.00 * 25.00 59799 802 POWERS AWARDS INC 000541 08/12/2004 101-5001-424.53-01 14.93 14.93 * 14.93 59800 197 PRESS ENTERPRISE 000543 08/12/2004 101-1004-413.55-01 753.15 753.15 * 753.15 59801 773 PRYOR SEMINARS, FRED 000544 08/12/2004 101-7003-431.51-01 281.11 281.11 * 281.11 59802 325 PSOMAS INC 000547 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.34-04 10,011.18 10,011.18 * 10,011.18 59803 841 PW CONSTRUCTION INC 000548 08/12/2004 401-1702-551.45-01 25,000.00 000549 08/12/2004 401-1702-551.45-01 25,000.00 50,000.00 * 50,000.00 59804 254 RASA/ERIC NELSON 000550 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 558.00 000551 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 304.00 000552 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 271.00 000553 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 416.00 "%O PREPARED%12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER I PAGE 8 PROGRAM: GMM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59804 254 RASA/ERIC NELSON 000554 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 201.00 000555 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 305.00 000556 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 303.00 000557 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 304.00 2,662.00 * 2,662.00 59805 1067 REHN TILE, ALLEN 00.0559 08/12/2004 101-1000-321.00-00 50.00 50.00 * 50.00 59806 1068 RIVERSIDE , COUNTY OF 000562 08/12/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 571.00 571.00 * 571.00 59807 82 RIVERSIDE AUDITOR -CONTROL 000561 08/12/2004 101-1001-411.53-03 4,221.68 4,221.68 * .4,221.68 59808 256 RIVERSIDE CNTY OFFICE OF 000560 08/12/2004 101-6002-463.53-01 9.00 9.00 * 9.00 59809 412 RIVERSIDE CNTY SHERIFFS D 000564 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-34 37,942.54 000565 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-22 12,605.45 000566 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-04 66,358.88 000567 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-19 461878.12 000568 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-13 8,471.28 000569 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-15 9,192.24 000570 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-07 12,032.00 000571 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.36-25 19,718.30 000632 08/12/2004 101-5054-421.`36-01 293,193.18 506,391.99. * 506,391.99 59810 228 RIVERSIDE PUBLIC HEALTH L 000563 08/12/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 18.00 18.00 * 18.00 59811 1069 ROGERS YOUTH SYMPHONY, BU 000572 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 500.00 500.00 * 500.00 59812 44 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP IN 000573 08/12/2004 405-9001-702.32-07 3,301.04 000574 08/12/2004 405-9001-702.32-07 1,500.00 000575 08/12/2004 245-9001-703.32-07 8,437.50 000576 08/12/2004 405-9001-702.32-07 150.00 000577 08/12/2004 245-9001-703.32-07 150.00 .000578 08/12/2004 406-9002-702.32-07 2,106.00 000579 08/12/2004 406-9002-702.32-07 400.00 000580 08/12/2004 406-9002-702.32-07 3,515.83 000581 08/12/2004 401-1737-551.32-10 28,906.98 48,467.35 * 48,467.35 59813 348 SENNA TREE COMPANY 000582 08/12/2004 401-1723-551.45-01 4,000.00 4,000600 * 4,000.00 59814 1070 SEPULVEDA BUILDING MATERI 000633 08/12/2004 401-1721-551.45-01 3,957.38 O co PREPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 9 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 -- WELLS FARGO BANK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59814 1070 SEPULVEDA BUILDING MATERI 3,957.38 * 3,957.38 59815 415 SIERRA LANDSCAPE CO INC 000583 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.45-01 123,741.00 123,741.00 * 123,741.00 59816 463 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 000584 08/12/2004 101-7004-431.56-52 53.99 53.99 * 53.99 59817 749 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS INC 000585 08/12/2004 502-0000-512.33-52 56.25 56.25 * 56.25 59818 113 STAN'S AUTO TECH 000602 08/12/2004 501-0000-511.43-40 338.02 338.02 * 338.02 59819 48 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 000586 08/12/2004 101-4001-415.56-01 577.41 000587 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.56-01 72.24 000588 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.56-02 19.61 000589 08/12/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 13.61 000590 08/12/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 29.01 000591 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.56-01 12.55 000592 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.56-01 154.36 000593 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.56-02 30.89 000594 08/12/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 3.34 000595 08/12/2004 101-6001-463.56-01 .75 000596 08/12/2004 101-6001-463.56-01 74.47 000597 08/12/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 8.60 000603 08/12/2004 101--5001-424.56-01 26.42 000604 08/12/2004 101-5001-424.56-01 183.00 000605 08/12/2004 101-5001-424.56-01 37.95 1,244.21 * 1,244.21 59820 260 STEELE GROUP INC, M.W. 000606 08/12/2004 401-1702-551.35-07 990.79 990.79 * 990.79 59821. 51 STONE'S AUTOMOTIVE, CAN 000598 08/12/2004 501-0000-511.43-40 110.84 000599 08/12/2004 501-0000-511.43-40 793.36 904.20 * 904.20 59822 1071 SUN BADGE CO 000600 08/12/2004 101-5002-424.56-28 96.43 96.43 * 96.43 59823 57 TOWN BARRICADES INC 000607 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.92-11 498.35 498.35 * 498.35 59824 1072 TOVAR, ANNE-MARGARET 000608 08/12/2004 101-3003-451.33-43 94.50 000609 08/12/2004 101-3003-451.33-43 315.00 409.50 * 409.50 59825 58 TRAFFEX ENGINEERS INC 000610 08/12/2004 101-7002-431.32-07 7,196.99 7,196.99 * 7,196.99 ti PREPARED08/12/2004, 9:27:12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY -BANK NUMBER PAGE 10 PROGRAM: GH346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 13 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59826 426 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 000613 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.32-07 34,675.25 000614 08/12/2004 401-1710-551.34-04 1,616.50 000615 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 1,166.00 37,457.75 * 37,457.75 59827 59 TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS 000616 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 12,075.00 12,075.00 * 12,075.00 59828 62 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 000618 08/12/2004 101.-7002-431.32-07 110.60 110.60 * 110.60 59829 1074 UNITED STATES POSTAL SVC 000619 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.51-31 5,000.00 51000.00 * 5,000.00 59830 430 VALLEY PARTNERSHIP, THE 0.00620 08/12/2004 101-1004-413.32-07 158.00 158.00 * 158.00 59831 1075 VELLA-FINORIO, THERESE 000621 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.56-01 26.83 26.83 * 26.83 59832 431 VIDEO DEPOT 000622 08/12/2004 101-3002-451.56-02 19.90 19.90 * 19.90 59833 264 VOLZ DESIGN, DAVID 000623 08/12/2004 401-1694-551.45-01 1,200.00 1,200.00 * 1,200.00 59834 70 WALMART COMMUNITY 000624 08/12/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 20.09 000625 08/12/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 13.40 000626 08/12/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 86.92 000627 08/12/2004 101-3003,-451.56-02 32.37 152.78 * 152.78 59835 1076 WARING INTERNATIONAL, VIR 000628 08/12/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 1,000.00 1,000.00 * 1,000.00 59836 1077 WASIK, MARYANN 000629 08/12/2004 101-3000-342.10-00 65.00 65.00 * 65.00 59837 265 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 000630 08/12/2004 101-2001-411.53-04 86.20 86.20 * 86.20 59838 201 YOUNG ENGINEERING SVC 000631 08/12/2004 101-5002-424.33-28 4,620.00 4,620.00 * 4,620.00 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 1,192,541.40 1,192,541.40 1--& N ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 1,192,541.40 1,192,541.40 •J C) PREPARED 08/12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GM3391. AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK4DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO -------------------------------------- NO NO DA E -------------------------------- NO DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------- AMOUNT 0001061 AIYA! INC 86280 000487 00 08/10/2004 101-4001-415.56-02 TRANSCRIBER 237.83 VENDOR TOTAL * 237.83 0000202 ALCALA, BOB JULY 2004 0003.71 00 08/06/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCOTR 14.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 14.00 0000129 ARCH WIRELESS N3393252G 000372 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.41-25 PAGER SVC 712.70 VENDOR TOTAL * 712.70 0000017 AVAYA INC 2718908869 000373 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.43-28 PHONE EQUIP MAINT 1,214.54 VENDOR TOTAL * 11214.54 0000018 BANG INC, DAVE 19259 000374 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.72-10 SHADE STRUCTURES 6,448.31 19258 000375 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.72-10 SHADE STRUTURE 4,569.02 19260 000376 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.72-10 SHADE STRUTURE 957.48 VENDOR TOTAL * 11,974.81 0000009 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR 47251 000378 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 680.11 47279 000379 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 1,462.50 47280 000380 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 450.00 47278 000381 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 3,412.50 47236 000382 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 225.00 47240 000383 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 562.50 47241 000384 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 450.00 47244 000385 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 750.00 47245 000386 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 562.50 47246 000387 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 750.00 47247 000388 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 450.00 47249 000389 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 750.00 47289 000390 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 11800.00 47290 000391 00 0811OZ2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 2,437.50 47292 000392 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 1,200.00 47293 000393 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 900.00 47294 000394 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN.CHECK SVC 51362.50 4.7296 000395 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 600.00 47281 000396 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 600.00 47283 000397 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 900.00 47284 000398 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 900.00 47286 000399 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 750.00 47285 000400 00-08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 450.00 47490 000401 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 31900.00 47491 000402 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 1,950.00 47250 000485 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 448.45 47114 000377 00 08/10/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 SR RANCH PROF SVC 7,620.00 W PREPARED 08L12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 2 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA., CALIFORNIA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK�DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DA E NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ 0000009 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR VENDOR TOTAL * 40,323.56 0000019 CADET UNIFORM SERVICE 79768 000403 00 08/10/2004 101-5008-419.44-07 UNIFORMS 5.68 79769 000404 00 08/10/2004 101-7003-431.44-07 UNIFORMS 59.00 79769 00040.5 00 08710/2004 101-7004-431.44-07 UNIFORMS 6.81 VENDOR TOTAL * 71.49 0000303 CALIF PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 14516 000407 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.53-03 MEMBERSHIP-S HORVITZ 140.00 22268 000408 00 08710/2004 101-3002-451.53-03 MEMBERSHIP-M SMITH 145.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 285.00 0000782 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE & DESIGN INC 12926 000406 00 08/10/2004 401-1739-551.32-10 LQ SKATE PARK CONST DOC 5,010.00 VENDOR'TOTAL * 5,010.00 0000130 CALIFORNIA OVERNIGHT 4394163 000488 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.51-31 OVERNIGHT MAIL 1.10.54 4399837 000491 00 08/10/2004 - 101-4002-415.51-31 OVERNIGHT MAIL 66.60 4394163 000489 00 08/10/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 OVERNIGHT MAIL 10.32 4399837 000492 00 08/10/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 OVERNIGHT MAIL 20.32 4394163 000490 00 08/10/2O 4 401-1723-551.45-01 OVERNIGHT MAIL 8.82 4399837 000493 00 08/1072004 401-1723-551.45-01 OVERNIGHT MAIL 42.83 VENDOR TOTAL * 259.43 0000132 CALIFORNIA POOLS 36857 000409 00 08/10/2004 101-5008-419.43-81 FOUNTIAN MAINT 107.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 107.00 0000106 CANON 4672988 000410 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.43-19 COPIER CHARGES 327.97 4672884 000411 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-4'15.43-19 COPIER CHARGES 26.68 4695675 000412 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.43-19 COPIER CHARGES 3,737.94 4695676 000413 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.43-19 COPIER CHARGES 6.55.94 VENDOR TOTAL * 4,748.53 0000020 CAPUTO, ROSEMARY HEIM ' JULY 2004 000414 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR 70.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 70.00 0000237 CARDIFF LIMOUSINE 264.991 000415 00 08/10/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 CAMP EXCURSION TRANSP 189.00 264990 000416 00 08/10/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 CAMP EXCURSION TRANSP 189.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 378.00 0000238 CARLO-CASELLAS, JAIME 189.00 JULY 2004 000417 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR VENDOR TOTAL * 189.00 ►-8000947 CASSEL, LLORA Jp PREPARED 08L12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 3 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK.DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK�DUE ACCOUNT IT-EM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO -------------------------------------- NO NO DA E --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT- 0000947 CASSEL, LLORA JULY 2004 000418 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR 126.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 126.00 0000022 CDW GOVERNMENT INC OA70053 000494 00 08/10/2004 502-0000-512.56702 SUPPLIES 63.58 VENDOR TOTAL * 63.58 0000023 CHECKMATE EXCHANGE 3150120 000419 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.56-02 ANSWERING SVC 69.29 VENDOR TOTAL * 69.29 0000140 COACHE.LLA VALLEY PRINTING GROUP INC 42436 000420 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.53-01 LIBRARY ANNOUNCEMENTS 156.24 VENDOR TOTAL * 156.24 0000206 COMPUTER U JULY 2004 000421 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR 468.75 VENDOR TOTAL * 468.75 0000210 DAHLIN GROUP ARCHITECTURE 40600289 000422 00 08/10/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 SR RESORT PROF SVC 4,750.00 40600290 000423 00 08/10/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 SR RESORT PROF SVC 1,051.82 VENDOR TOTAL * 5,801.82 0000475 DATAPRINT CORPORATION 1247516 000424 00 08/10/2004 101-5001-424.56-01 SUPPLIES 45.89 VENDOR TOTAL * 45.89 0006112 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 482488 000425 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-31 BOOKING BLOOD TESTS 455.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 455.00 0001055 DESERT ISLES 2466 000426 00 08/10/2004 101-1000-321.00-00 REFUND BUSINESS LIC 45.00 VENDOR TOTAL.* 45.00 0000027 DESERT PERSONNEL SVC INC 32062, 000427 00 08/10/2004 101-4001-415.10-05 CONTRACT SVC- 696.00 32041 000430 00 08/10/2004 101-4001-415.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 295.80 32062 000428 00 08/10/2004 101-5002-424.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 1,012.78 32041 000431 00 08/10/2004 101-5002-424.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 1,025.60 32042 000429 00 08/1072004 101-7002-431.32-10 CONTRACT SVC 835.20 VENDOR TOTAL * 3,865.38 3 0 00007-LAB. 0007 DESERT PHOTO 000433 00 08/10/2064 ' 101-7006-431.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 11.57 60925 000434 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 15.42 60925 000435 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.34-.04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 7.71 60925 000436 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 15.43 GJ PREPARED 08412/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 4 PROGRAM: GM39L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VEND NO INVOICE VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NO DA E NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0000073 60972 DESERT PHOTO LAB 000438 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 2. 61246 000440 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 13.70 61143 000442 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 19.69 60925 000432 00 08/10/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 27.00 60972 000437 00 08/10/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 31.55 61246 000439 00 08/10/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 25.45 61143 000441 00 08/10/2004. 401-1729-551.34-04 INSPECTION PHOTOS 45.94 VENDOR TOTAL * 234.49 0000307 599 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED .000443 SCHOOL 00 DIST 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-16 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS 11,851.92 VENDOR TOTAL * - 11,851.92 0000211 DESERT. SUN PUBLISHING CO 278.27 2307788 000444 00 08/10/2004 101-1004-413.55-01 ADVERTISING VENDOR TOTAL * 278.27 0000363 DIAMOND RINGERS SOFTBALL CLUB 2004/2005 000445 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 COMM SVC GRANT 1,500.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 1,500.00 0000028 JULY 2004 DOUGLAS, LES 000446 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR 655.20 VENDOR TOTAL * 655.20 0000389 JULY 2004 DUNHAM, KATHY 000447 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR 970.20 VENDOR TOTAL * 970.20 0000309 410307-001 ELMS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 000448 00 INC 08/10/2004 101-7003-431.44-01 EQUIP RENTAL 1,088.06 VENDOR TOTAL * 1,088.06 0001056 ENDICOTT ENTERPRISES 192.93 2538 000449 00 08/1.0/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 SUPPLIES VENDOR- TOTAL * 192.93 0000029 150277 EVANS & ASSOCIATES 000450 INC, DAVID 00 08/10/2004 401-1733-551.35-07 WASHINGTON MEDIANS DESIGN 11,254.66 _ 149604 000451 00 08/10/2004 401-1740-551.35-07 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMP PROG 2,162.52 VENDOR TOTAL * 13,417.18 0000S76 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTION 166.64 20188082 000452 00 08/10/2004 101-5001-424.34-04 PARCEL UPDATES VENDOR TOTAL * 166.64 , 0000031 201163 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 000453 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.56-27 COFFEE SUPPLIES 56.68 201162 000495 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.56-27 COFFEE SUPPLIES 232.05 01 r.� PREPARED 08L12/2004, 8:14:35. EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 5 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK�DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DA E NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0000031 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 0001057 FISHER CONSTRUCTION INC, DAVID 2494 0.00457 00 08/10/2004 0000366 FRANKLIN COVEY 51,701728 000454 00 08/10/2004 259594966 000455 00 08/10/2004 0000756 FRIENDS OF THE DESERT MOUNTAINS 2004-2005 000456 00 08/10/2004 0000276 GATEWAY BUSINESS 98312187 000496 00 08/10/2004 98349736 000497 00 08/10/2004 0001058 GDI COMMUNICATIONS INC 2185 000458 00 08/10/2004 0000367 GENOVESE, THOMAS P 7/27-28/2004 000459 00 08/10/2004 0000243 HEINBUCH GOLF 7DO4 000460 00 08/10/2004 0001059 HENSLEY, REGENIA 2004 000461 00 08/10/2004 0001060 HOKE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING 3789 000462 00 08/10/2004 0000036 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1024501 000463 00 08/10/2004 9010881 000464 00 08/10/2004 4011178 000465 00 08710/2004 0000540 HOOPER, FAYE JULY 2004 000466 ,1000179 HTE INC 00 08/10/2004 VENDOR TOTAL 101-6000-343.12-00 HOME OCC REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 101-7003-431.56-02 SUPPLIES 101-7003-431.56-02 SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 101-3001-451.80-01 COHN SVC GRANT VENDOR TOTAL 502-0000-512.71-01 COMPUTERS 502-0000-512.71-01 COMPUTERS VENDOR TOTAL 101-7004-431.43-67 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIP VENDOR -TOTAL 101-1002-41,3.51-01 LUNCH MEETINGS VENDOR TOTAL 401-1723-551.32-10 SR RESORT PROF SVC VENDOR TOTAL 101-2001-411.51-01 NOTARY STUDY VENDOR TOTAL 101-1000-321.00-00 REFUND BUSINESS LIC VENDOR TOTAL 101-7004-431.56-52 SUPPLIES 101-7004-431.56-52 SUPPLIES 101-7004-431.56-52 SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR VENDOR TOTAL 288.73 5.00 5.00 85.65 25.85- 59.80 1,000.00 1,000.00 10,365.07 21656.89 13,021.96 5,408.00 5,408.00 71.33 71.33 20,710.00 20,710.00 29.95 29.95 50.00 50.00 224.22 329.29 238.71 792.22 90.00 90.00 Pj CA PREPARED 08L12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 6 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DA E NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0000179 HTE INC 848139 000498 00 08/10/2004 502-0000-512.56-25 SOFTWARE TRAINING 847345 000499 00 08/1072004 502-0000-512.56-25 SOFTWARE PROGRAMING VENDOR TOTAL 0000988 INDIO SHOE STORE INC 6981 000468 00 08/10/2004 101-7003-431.56-40 SAFETY BOOTS 6984 000467 00 08/1072004 101-7004-431.56-40 SAFETY BOOTS VENDOR TOTAL 0000144 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING 2004 000469 00 08/10/2004 101-1003-413.51-01 TRADE SHOW 2004 000472 00 08/10/2004 101-1003-413.51-01 TRADE SHOW 2004 000470 00 08/10/2004 405-9001-702.51-01 TRADE SHOW 2004 000473 00 08/10/2004 405-9001-702.51-01 TRADE SHOW 2004 000471 00'08/10/2004 406-9002-702.51-01 TRADE SHOW 2004 000474 00 08110/.2004 406-9002-702.51-01 TRADE SHOW VENDOR TOTAL 0000923 J & H ASSET PROPERTY MANAGEMENT JULY 2004 000475 00 08/10/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 MANAGEMENT FEES VENDOR TOTAL 0000194 JACOBS, STEVEN JULY 2004 000476 00 08/10/2004 101-3003-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR JULY 2004 000477 00 08/10/2004 101-3003-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR VENDOR TOTAL 0000374 JOBS AVAILABLE - 415066 000478 00 08/10/2004 101-1004-413.55-01 ADVERTISEMENT VENDOR TOTAL 0000077 JONASSON, TIM RCTC 000479 00 08/10/2004 101-7001-431.51-01 MILEGE REINS VENDOR TOTAL 0000196 KEITH COMPANIES, THE 37662 000480 00 08/10/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 SR RESORT PROF SVC 37666 000481 00 08710/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 SR RESORT PROF SVC VENDOR TOTAL 0000079 KINER GOODSELL INC 21412 000482 00 08/10/2004 101-1003-413.55-07 JULY 2004 RETAINER VENDOR TOTAL 0000865 KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION, BRUCE LMC120 000483 00 08/10/2004 101-7004-431.32-07 LIGHTING REPAIR/MAINT LMC120 000486 00 08/09/2004 101-7005-431.32-07 LIGHTING REPAIRIMAINT 2069 000484 00 08/10/2004 401-1723-551.45-01 SR RANCH GENERA OR VENDOR TOTAL 0"0000867 La Quinta Arts-261075 3,000.00 600.00 3,600.00 191.74 310.32 502.06 390.00 150.00 455.00 175.00 455.00 175.00 11800.00 6,276.51 6,276.51 227.50 91.00 318.50 92.00 92.00 37.13 37.13 17,172.00 25,635.93 42,807.93 3.,000.00 3,000.00 3,040.00 600.00 240.00 31880.00 PREPARED 08412/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 7 PROGRAM: GM39L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO -------------------------------------- NO NO DA E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0000867 La Quinta Arts-261075 00 08/10/2004 101-0000-228.10-00 28,330.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 28,330.0.0 0000394 LANDMARK GEO-ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS LP080408 000500 00 08/10/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 SOIL STAGBILIZATION 449.50 VENDOR TOTAL * 449.50 0001062 LIVING DESERT, THE •2004/2005 000502 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 COHN SVC GRANT 1,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 11000.00 0000800 M-S CASH.DRAWER CORPORATION 266655 000503 00 08/10/2004 502-0000-512.56-02 PRINTER PAPER 76.03 VENDOR TOTAL * 76.03 0000220 JULY 2004 MARSHALL, SALLY 000504 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR 429.10 VENDOR TOTAL * 4.29.10 0001063 MC CALLUM THEATRE 2004/2005 000505 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 COMM SVC GRANT 2,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 21000.00 0000221 MC DOWELL AWARDS 591277 000506 00 08/10/2004 101-2001-411.53-01 BRASS PLATES 169.28 VENDOR TOTAL * 169.28 0000184 2075 MC HURRY INC 000507 00 08/10/2004 401-1723-551.32-10 RETAINER JULY, 2004 16,111.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 16,111.00 0001064 MD SOLUTIONS 1/04 - 1/05 000508 00 08/10/2004 101-5056-425.33-43 AED HEART UNITS 220.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 220.00 0000250 2004-9/2 NAI CONSULTING INC 000509 .00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 706.84 2004-9/2 000510 00 08/10/2004 101-7003-431.32-07 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 1,123.84 2004-9/2 000511 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.32-07 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 541.66 2004-9/2 000512 00 08/10/2004 401-1710-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 95.00 2004-9/2 000513 00 08/10/2004 401-1714-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 1,549.41 2004-9/-2 000514 00 08/10/2004 401-1722-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 95.00 2004-9/2 000515 00.08/10/2004 401-1726-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 995.00 2004-9/2 000516 00 0811OZ2004 401-1729-551.35-07 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 190.00 2004-9/2 000517 00 08/10/2004 401-1733-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 682.32 2004-9/2 000518 00 08/10/2004 401-1734-551.35-07 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 271.34 2004-9/2 000519 00 08/10/2004 401-1736-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 110.72 2004-9/2 000522 00 08/10/2004 401-1739-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 117.50 2004-9/2 000520 00 08/10/2004 401-1740-551.32-10 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 212.50 �p PREPARED 08L12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 8 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK�DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DA E NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0000250 NAI CONSULTING INC 2004-9/2 000521 00 08/10/2004 405-9001-702.55-07 PROJ MGMNT/TECHNICAL SVC 1,927.50 0000040 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 916525027024 000523 . 00 08/10/2004 0001065 NIETO, RUBEN 225053 000524 00 08/10/2004 0000060 NOLEN INC, TRULY 660169145 000611 00 08/10/2004 660162732 000612 00 08/10/2004 0000041 OFFICE DEPOT 250392757001 000526 00 08/10/2004 250386790001 000528 00 08/10/2004 250386790002 000531 00 08/10/2004 252290434001 000532 00 08/10/2004 251002035001 000530 00 08/10/2004 252486528001 000527 00 08/10/2004 252457546001 000525 00 08/10/2004 251002035001 000529 00 08/10/2004 0000187 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER INC 406005 000533 00 0811OZ2004 406006 000534 00 08/10/2004 0000962 PARK BILLING CO INC 536 1 000536 00 68/10/2004 0000835 PARTNERSHIP TO PRESERVE INDEPENDENT VENDOR TOTAL 101-4002-415.41-25 WIRELESS PHONE SVC VENDOR, TOTAL 501-0000-511.43-43 VEHICLE WASHES VENDOR TOTAL 101-3002-451.42-20 -PEST CONTROL SVC 101-5054-421.43-62 PEST CONTROL SVC VENDOR TOTAL 101-1002-413.56-01 SUPPLIES 101-1002-413..56-01 SUPPLIES 101-1002-413.56-01 SUPPLIES 101-1002-413.56-01 SUPPLIES 101-2001-411.56-01 SUPPLIES 101-4001.-415.56-01 SUPPLIES 101-4002-415.56-07 SUPPLIES 101-4002-415.56-07 SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL 401-1710-551.32-10 JEFFERSON ST RELOC SVC 401-1710-551.32-10 JEFFERSON ST RELOC SVC VENDOR TOTAL 246-9002-703.51-68 AUG 2004 BILLING CHARGE VENDOR TOTAL JULY 2004 000537 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.33-43 INSTRUCTOR VENDOR TOTAL 0001066 PC MAGAZINE 300884 000538 00 08/10/2004 502-0000-512.53-04 SUBSCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL 0000837 PINNACLE DESIGN COMPANY 772 000539 00 08/10/2004' 401-1723-551.32-10 SR RESORT PROF SVC VENDOR TOTAL 0000186 PITNEY BOWES N O 8,618.63 2,208.80 2,208.80 367.00 367.00 75.00 34.00 109.00 27.55 53.51 7.95 8.28- 33.10 7.73 442.85 147.62 712.03 1,430.00 2,175.00 3,605.00 69.75 69.75 429.80 429.80 34.97 34.97 79,016.36 79,016.36 PREPARED 08/12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 9 PROGRAM: GM3339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0000186 PITNEY BOWES 3089208-JN.04 000540 00 08/10/2004 101-4002-415.43-16 MAILING SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL 0000552 PLANNING CENTER INC, THE ' 32417 000545 00 08/10/2004 101-6002-463.32-10 HOUSING ELEMENT 32726 000546 00 08/10/2004 101-6002-463.32-10 HOUSING ELEMENT VENDOR TOTAL 0000839 POWER PLUS 130417PO704 000542 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.41-30 SATELLITE OFFICE VENDOR TOTAL 0000802 POWERS AWARDS INC 83280 000541 00 08/10/2004 101-5001-424.53-01 NAME PLATE VEN.DOR TOTAL 0000197 PRESS ENTERPRISE 194573 6/04 000543 00 08/10/2004 101-1004-413.55-01 ADVERTISING VENDOR TOTAL 0000773 PRYOR SEMINARS, FRED 7321968 000544 00 08/10/2004 101-7003-431.51-01 TRAINING MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL 0000325 PSOMAS INC 2402 000547 00 08/10/2004 .101-7002-431.34-04 LQ MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN' VENDOR TOTAL 0000841 PW CONSTRUCTION INC 4000-004 000548 00 08/10/2004 401-1702-551.45-01 LQ LIBRARY CONST MGMNT 4000-003 000549 00 08/10/2004 401-1702-551.45-01 LQ LIBRARY CO.NST MGMNT VENDOR TOTAL 0000254 RASA/ERIC NELSON 3185 000550 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 3186 000551 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 3187 000552 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-3.4 PLAN CHECK SVC 3180 000553 00 08/10/2004 101,-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 3178 000554 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 3182 000555 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 3183 000556 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC 3181 000557 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.33-34 PLAN CHECK SVC VENDOR TOTAL 0001067 RE HN TILE, ALLEN 3125 000559 00. 08/10/2004 101-1000-321.00-00 REFUND BUSINESS LIC OVRPT VENDOR TOTAL 0001068 RIVERSIDE , COUNTY OF N . M-+ 1,366.00 1,366.00 6,319.39 575.35 6,894.74 25.00 25.00 14.93 14.93 753.15 753.15 281.11 . 281.11 10, 011 .18. 10,011.18 25,000.00 25,000.00 50,000.00 558.00 304.00 271 .00 416.00 201.00 305.00 303.00 304.00 2,.662.00 50.00 50.00 PREPARED 08412/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 10 PROGRAM: GM39L AS OF: 08/11/2004. CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK4DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DA E NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001068 RIVERSIDE , COUNTY OF 19348 000562 00 08/10/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 -ANNUAL WATER SYS PERMIT 571.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 571.00 0000082 RIVERSIDE AUDITOR -CONTROLLER (1050) 2004/05 000561 00 08/16/2004 101-1001-411.53-03 #2838 LAFCO.IMPLEMENTATN 4,221.68 VENDOR TOTAL * 4,221.68 0000256 RIVERSIDE CNTY OFFICE OF ASSESSOR 4026 000560 00 08/10/2004 101-6002-463.53-01 ASSESSOR MAPS 9.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 9.00 0000412 RIVERSIDE CNTY SHERIFFS DEPT SH11-8 000564 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-34 LAW ENFORCEMENT.SVC 37,942.54 SH11-8 000565 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-22 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 12,605.45 SH11-8 000566 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-04 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 66,358.88 SH11-8 000567 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-19 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 46,878.12 SH11-8 000568 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-13 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 8,471.28 SH11-8 000569 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-15 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 9,192.24 SH11-8 000570 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-07 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 12,032.00 SH11-8 000571 00 08/10/2004 101-5054-421.36-25 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 19,718.30 SH11-8 000632. 00 08711/2004 101-5054-421.36-01 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 293,193.18 VENDOR TOTAL * 506,391.99 0000228 RIVERSIDE PUBLIC HEALTH LAB 3/1-31/04 000563 00 08/10/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 WATER EXAMS REPORT 18.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 18.00 0001069 ROGERS YOUTH SYMPHONY, BUDDY 2004/2005 000572 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.80-01 COMMUNITY SVC GRANT 500.00 0000044 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC JUNE 2004 000575 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000577 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000581 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000573 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000574 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000576 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000578 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000579 00 08/10/2004 JUNE 2004 000580 00 08/10/2004 0000348 SENNA TREE COMPANY 17173 000582 00 08/10/2004 0001070 SEPULVEDA BUILDING MATERIALS 898589 000633 00 08/11/2004 N N 245-9001-703.32-07 245-9001-703.32-07 401-1737-551.32-10 405-9001-702.32-07 405-9001-702.32-07 405-9001-702.32-07 406-9002-702.32-07 406-9002-702.32-07 406-9002-702.32-07 VENDOR TOTAL * HWY 111 REAL EST ANALYSIS ECONOMIC DEV PLAN PROF SVC RANCH PLANNING REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS ECONOMIC DEV PLAN ASSESSMENT SUBSIDY ADMN RENTAL HOUSING OVRSGHT LQ HOUSING PROG VENDOR TOTAL 401--1723-551.45-01 SR RANCH TREE MAINT 401-1721-551.45-01 PAVERS VENDOR TOTAL * 500.00 81437.50 150.00 28,906.98 3,301.04 1,500.00 150.00 2,106.00 400.00 3,515.83 48,467.35 4,000.00 41000.00 3,957.38 PREPARED 08/12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 11 PROGRAM: GM3339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM. EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------------------------- 0001070 SEPULVEDA BUILDING MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL * 3,957.38 0000415 SIERRA LANDSCAPE CO INC 8244 000583 00 08/10/2004 401-1729-551.45-01 SOIL STABILIZATION 123,741.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 123,741.00 0000463 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY CO 1963 000584 00 08/10/2004 101-7004-431.56-52 SUPPLIES 53.99 VENDOR TOTAL * 53.99 0000749 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS INC 04-7129 000585 00 08/10/2004 502-0000-512.33-52 COMPUTER SVC 56.25 VENDOR TOTAL * 56.25 0000113 STAN'S AUTO TECH 76 000602 00 08/10/2004 501-0000-511.43-40 VEHICLE REPAIRS 338.02 VENDOR TOTAL * 338.02 0000048 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3046920568 000591 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.56-01 SUPPLIES 12.55 3046997656 000592 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.56-01 SUPPLIES 154.36 3046920567 000587 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.56-01 SUPPLIES 72.24 3046997657 000586 00 08/10/2004 101-4001-415.56-01 SUPPLIES 577.41 3047024314 000603 00 08/10/2004 101-5001-424.56-01 SUPPLIES 26.42 3046997655 000604 00 08/10/2004 101-5001-424.56-01 SUPPLIES 183.00 3046997654 000605 00 08/10/2004 101-5001-424.56-01 SUPPLIES 37:95 3047043721 000595 00 08/10/2004 101-6001-463.56-01 SUPPLIES .75 3047033270 000596 00 08/10/2004 101-6001-463.56-01 SUPPLIES 74.47 3047120949 000589 00 08/10/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 SUPPLIES 13.61 3047120950 000590 00 08/10/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 SUPPLIES 29.01 3046997658 000594 00 08/10/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 SUPPLIES 3.34 3046883491 000597 00 08/10/2004 101-7001-431.56-01 SUPPLIES 8.60 3047120948 000588 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.56-02 SUPPLIES 19.61 3046997658 000593 00 08/10/2004 101-7002-431.56-02 SUPPLIES 30.89 VENDOR TOTAL * 1,244.21 0000260 STEELE GROUP INC, M.W. 110#21 000606 00 08/10/2004 401-1702-551.35-07 CONT SVC/DESIGN 990.79 VENDOR TOTAL * 990.79 0000051 STONE'S AUTOMOTIVE, CAN 25859 000598 00 08/10/2004 501-0000-511.43-40 VEHICLE REPAIRS 110.84 25968 000599 00 08/10/2004 501-0000-511.43-40 VEHICLE REPAIRS 793.36 VENDOR TOTAL * 904.2-0 0001071 SUN BADGE CO 251109 000600 00 08/10/2004 101-5002-424.56-28 96.43 VENDOR TOTAL * 96.43 ' 0000057 TOWN BARRICADES INC t,a PREPARED 08L12/2004, 8:14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 12 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0000057 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 963087 000607 00 08/10/2004 0001072 TOVAR, ANNE-MARGARET JULY 2004 000608 00 08/10/2004 JULY 2004 000609 00 08710/2004 0000058 TRAFFEX ENGINEERS INC 3 000610 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.92-11 LITEBAR 101-3003-451.33-43 101-3003-451.33-43 101-7002-431.32-07 0000426 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 2246 000613 00 08/10/2004 101-7006-431.32-07 2246 000614 00 08/10/2004 401-1710-551.34-04 2246 000615 00 08/10/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 0000059 TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS & CIVIL 4098 000.616 00 08/10/2004 0000062 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 2004070349 000618 00 08/10/2004 401-1729-551.34-04 VENDOR TOTAL INSTRUCTOR INSTRUCTOR VENDOR TOTAL CONTRACT SVC. VENDOR TOTAL INSPECTION SVC INSPECTION SVC INSPECTION SVC VENDOR TOTAL SURVEY SVCS VENDOR TOTAL 101-7002-431.32-07 TICKETS 0001074 UNITED STATES POSTAL SVC FALL 2004 000619 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.51-31 0000430 VALLEY PARTNERSHIP, THE JUNE 2004 000620 00 08/10/2004 101-1004-413.32-07 0001075 VELLA-FINORIO, THERESE JUL 2004 000621. 00 08/10/2004 101-3001-451.56-01 0000431 VIDEO DEPOT JULY 2004 000622 00 08/10/2004 101-3002-451.56-02 0000264 VOLZ DESIGN, DAVID 41193 000623 00 08/10/2004 401-1694-551.45-01 0000070 WALMART COMMUNITY 028933 000626 00 08/10/2004 101-3003-451.56-02 029049 000627- 00 08/10/2004 101-3003-451..56-02 N .p VENDOR TOTAL POSTAGE/REC BROCHURE VENDOR TOTAL EAP SVCS VENDOR TOTAL DICTAPHONE HEADSET VENDOR TOTAL VIDEO RENTALS VENDOR TOTAL WATER FEATURE VENDOR TOTAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES SOCCER/DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 498.35 498.35 94.50 315.00 409.50 7,196.99 7,196.99 34,675.25 1,616.50 1,166,00 37,457.75 12,075.00 12,075.00 110.60 110.60 5,000.00 5,000.00 158.00 158.00 26.83 26.83 19.90 19.90 1,200.00 11200.00 86.92 32.37 PREPARED 08/12/2004, 8:T 14:35 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 13 PROGRAM: GM3339L AS OF: 08/11/2004 . CHECK DATE: 08/12/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK�DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DA E NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0000070 WALMART COMMUNITY 002477 000625 00 08/10/2004 002477 000624 00 08/10/2004 0001076 WARING INTERNATIONAL, VIRGINIA 2004/2005 000628 00 08/10/2004 0001077 WASIK, MARYANN 29353 000629 00 08/10/2004 0000265 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 807029921 000630 00 08/10/2004 0000201 YOUNG ENGINEERING SVC 04-154 000631 00 08/10/2004 N Lh 101-7006-431.34-04 INSPECTION FILM 401-1729-551.34-04 INSPECTION FILM VENDOR TOTAL 101-3001-451.80-01 COMM SVC GRANT VENDOR TOTAL 101-3000-342.10-00 REFUND CLASS VENDOR TOTAL 101-2001-411.53-04 CA CODES VENDOR TOTAL 101-5002-424.33-28 PLAN CHECK SVC VENDOR TOTAL TOTAL•EXPENDITURES **** GRAND TOTAL'*********** 13.40 20.09 152.78 1,000.00 1,000.00 65.00 65.00 86.20 86.20 4,620.00 41620.00 1192,541.40 1,192,541.40 PREPARED08/06/2004, 12:06:39 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GN346L ACCOUNTING.PERIOD 2005/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 12 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO -------------------- NO NAME ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59714 966 DEPARTMENT of HOUSING & C 000370 08/06/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 108.96 108.96 * 108.96 59715 1052 FEACK, EUGENE & CAROL 000365 08/06/2004 401-1710-551.74-01 431.44 431.44 * 431.44 59716 136 GAS COMPANY, THE 000367 08/06/2004 101-3002-451.41-13 67.38 67.38 * 67.38 59717 1054 ROBERTSON, VICKI 000368 08/06/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 5,000.00 5,000.00 * 5,000.00 59718 1053 STORAGE USA LA QUINTA II 000366 08/06/2004 401-1710-551.74-01 1,480.00 1,480.00 * 1,480.00 59719 162 WEISS, MARK 000369 08/06/2004 405-9001-702.51-01 47.00 47.00 * 47.00 BANK/CHECK TOTAL ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 7,134.78 7,134.78 7,134.78 7,134.78 PREPARED 08/06/2004, 11:56:49 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE. 1 PROGRAM: GM3339LL AS OF: 08/06/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/06/2004 CITY OF LA 4UINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------- ; NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0000966 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY RS000700004000 000370 00 08/06/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 HCD FEES OWED 108.96 0001052 F.EACK, EUGENE & CAROL CCO20693 000365 00 08/06/2004 0000136 GAS COMPANY, THE 09422738006 704000367 00 08/06/2004 0001054 ROBERTSON, VICKI RS600700015060 000368 00 08/06/2004 0001053 STORAGE USA LA 4UINTA II CCO20693 000366 00 08/06/2004 0000162 WEISS, MARK 8/3/04 000369 N. CA 00 08/06/2004 VENDOR TOTAL * 108.96 401-1710-551.74-01 MOVING EXPENSE 431.44 VENDOR TOTAL * 431.44 101-3002-451.41-13 GAS SVC 67.38 VENDOR TOTAL * 67.38 401-1737-551.45-10 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 5,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 5,000.00 401-1710-551.74-01 MOVING EXPENSE 1,480.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 1,480.00 405-9001-702.51-01 LUNCH MEETING 47.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 47.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES **** 7,134.78 GRAND TOTAL *********** 7,134.78 PREPARED08/05/2004, 13:57:30 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 PROGRAM: CITY OF GN346L LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 11 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER NO P.O. DATE NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME ---------------------- 59535* 1010 CAPITAL PACIFIC HOMES, LL 005238 07/27/2004 101-5000-342.82-00 2,250.00- 005239 07/27/2004 401-1710-551.45-01 4,500.00- 005240 07/2772004 401-1710-551.45-01 3,500.00- 10,250.00- * VOIDED 59556* 817 DESERT PIPE & SUPPLY 000132 07/27/2004 101-7005-431.56-52 439.62- 000133 07/2772004 101-5001-424.34-04 166.64- 606.26- * VOIDED 59698 1047 ADOLF, DON 000325 08/05/2004 101-1001-411.51-01 1,260.29 1,260.29 * 1,260.29 59699 938 BATURONI, SONIA 000326 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 41640.00 4,640.00 * 41640.00 59700 j 1010 CAPITAL PACIFIC HOMES, LL 000327 08/05/2004 101-5000-342.82-00 2,250.00 2,250.00 * 2,250.00 59701 593 CAPITAL REALTY ANALYSTS 000328 08/05/2004 401_1710_551.45_01 000329 08/05/2004 401 1710 551.45 01 3,500.00 , 8,000.00 * 8,00000 59702 979 CORDERO 9, AGUSTIN 000330 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 2,407.50 2,407.50 * 2,407.50 59703 966 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & C 000331 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 92.50 92.50 * 92.50 59704 817 DESERT PIPE & SUPPLY 000332 08/05/2004 101-7005-431.56-52 439.62 439.62 * 439.62 59705 576 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTAT 000333 08/05/2004 101-5001-424.34-04 166.64 166.64 * 166.64 59706 1005 GRANGER, DENNIS 000334 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 4,000.00 4,000.00 * 4,000.00 59707 1048 HOBLIT-HAYNES DODGE 000335 000336 08Z05/2004 08705/2004 601-0000-451.71-03 601-0000-451.71-03 20,848.00 500.00- 20,348.00 * 20,348.00 59708 1 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTR 000337 000338 08/05/2004 08Z05Z2004 246-9002-703.51-68 246-9002-703.51-68 79.92 11,165.16 000339 08Z05Z2004 101-5054-421.41-01 310.54 000340 08Z05Z2004 101-7003-431.41-01 906.04 000341 08/05/2004 101-7004-431.41-04 7,226.31 000342 08/05/2004 101-7004-431.41-07 1,648.10 000343 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-52 3,428.65 000344 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-54 146.90 000345 08/05/2004 101-7005-431.40-56 2,4.84.95 PREPARED08/05/2004, 13:57:30 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/02 PROGRAM: CITY OF GN346L LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 11 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ---------------------------------- ---------- CHECK ------------------------------------------------------------------ VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO .- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) --------------------- TOTAL 59708 1 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTR 000346 0810512004 101-7005-431.40-58 75.52 000347 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-60 395.21 000348 08/05/2004 401-1694-551.45-01 6.41 28,073.71 28,073.71 59709 1049 PEREZ 9, RODOLFO 000349 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 2,960.00 2,960.00 2,960.00 59710 157 POWER STAFFING SOLUTIONS 000351, 08/05120,04 101-7006-431.10-05 1,095.12 000352 08'/05Z2004 101-7006-431.10-05 856.44 000353 08Z05Z2004 101-5002-424.10-05 482.40 000354 08Z05Z2004 101-7002-431.10-05 361.08 000355 08Z05Z2004 101-5002-424.10-05 643.20 000356 0810512004 101-3001-451.10-05 883.60 41321.84 41321.84 59711 1050 RAMIREZ 9, BRENDA 000357 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 21425.00 2,42.5.00 2,425.00 59712 1051 TROUSDELL, GREG 000358 08/05/2004 101-6002-463.51-03 48.75 48.75 48.75 59713 67 VERIZON 000350 08/05/2004 101-4002-415.41.-22 91.22 000359 08Z05Z2004 101-4002-415.41-22 3,108 65 0003.60 08Z05Z2004 101-4002-415.41-22 46:45 000361 08Z05Z2004 101-4002-415.41-22 27.95 000362 08Z05Z2004 101-4002-415.41-22 328.03 000363 08105/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 59.38 3,661.68 3,661.68 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 74,239.27 85,095.53 ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 74,239.27 85f095.53 Co PREPARED 08L05/2004, 10:58:49 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE. 1 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/05/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/65/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ------------ -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- 0001047 ADOLF, DON LCC CONF 000325 0000938 -BATURONI, SONIA RSGO0700008000 000326 00 08/05/2004 101-1001-411.51-01 00 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 0001010 TR24890-4 CAPITAL PACIFIC 005238 HOMES, 00 LLC 07/27/2004 101-5000-342.82-00 TR24890-4 000327 00 08Z05Z2004 101-5000-342.82-00 04-1296 005239 00 07/27/2004 401-1710-551.45-01 04-1298 005240 00 07/27/2004 401-1710-551.45-01 0000593 CAPITAL REALTY ANALYSTS 04-1296 000328 00 08/05/2004 401-1710-551.45-01 04-1298 000329 00 08/05/2004 401-1710-551.45-01 0000979 CORDERO &, AGUSTIN RS000700001000 000330 00 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 0000966 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY RSGO0700001000 000331 00 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 0000817 DESERT PIPE & SUPPLY 20182920 000133 00 07/27/2004 101-5001-424.34-04 1166742 000132 00 07/27/2004 101-7005-431.56-52 1166742 000332 00 08/05/2004 101-7005-431.56-52 0000576 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTION 20182920 000333 00 08/05/2004 101-5001-424.34-04 0001005 GRANGER, DENNIS RS000700019000 000334 00 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 0001048 HOBLIT-HAYNES DODGE 1416 000335 00 08/05/2004 601-0000-451.71-03 1416 000336 00 08/05/2004 601-0000-451.71-03 0000001 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT VARIOUS 6/04 000339 00 08/05/2004 101-5054-421.41-01 VARIOUS 6/04 000340 00 08/05/2004 101-7003-431.41-01 W O REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSE 1,260.29 VENDOR TOTAL * 1,260.29 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 4,640.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 4,640.00 REFUND PLAN CK FEES CHECK #: 59535 REFUND PLAN CK FEES 2,250.00 JEFFERSON ST APPRAISAL CHECK #: 59535 JEFFERSON ST APPRAISAL CHECK #: 59535 VENDOR TOTAL * 2,250.00 JEFFERSON ST APPRAISAL 4,500.00 JEFFERSON ST APPRAISAL 3,500.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 8,000.00 FINAL PMT/PURCHASE MH 2,407.50 VENDOR TOTAL * 2,407.50 PURCHASE MOBILE HOME 92.50 VENDOR TOTAL * 92.50 PARCEL UPDATES CHECK #: 59556 SUPPLIES CHECK #: 59556 SUPPLIES 439.62 VENDOR TOTAL * 439.62 PARCEL UPDATES 166.64 VENDOR TOTAL * 166.64 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 4,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 4,000.00 2004 JEEP LIBERTY 20,848.00 20 DAY DISCOUNT 500.00- VENDOR TOTAL* 20,348.00 ELECTRIC SVC 310.54 ELECTRIC SVC 906.04 2,250.00- 4,500.00- 3,500.00- 10,250.00- 166.64- 439.62- 606.26 C ...3 co PREPARED 08 05/2004, 10:58:49 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 2 PROGRAM: GM 39L AS OF: 08/05/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/05/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK�DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO -------------------------------------- NO NO DA E --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0000001 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT VARIOUS 6/04 000341 00 08/05/2004 101-7004-431.41-04 ELECTRIC SVC 7,226.31 VARIOUS 6/04 000342 00 08/05/2004 101-7004-431.41-07 ELECTRIC SVC 11648.10 VARIOUS 6/04 000343 00 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-52 ELECTRIC SVC 3,428.65 VARIOUS 6/04 000344 00 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-54 ELECTRIC SVC 146.90 VARIOUS 6/04 000345 00 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-56 ELECTRIC SVC 2,684.95 VARIOUS 6/04 000346 00 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-58 ELECTRIC SVC 75.52 VARIOUS 6 04 000347 00 08Z05Z2004 101-7005-431.40-60 ELECTRIC SVC 395.21 50262054 7/04 000337 00 08/05/2004 246-9002-703.51-68 ELECTRIC SVC 79.92 50262053 7104 000338 00 08Z05Z2004 246-9002-703.51-68 ELECTRIC SVC 11,165.16 VARIOUS 6/04 000348 00 08/05/2004 401-1694-551.45-01 ELECTRIC SVC 6.41 VENDOR TOTAL * 28,073.71, 0001049 PEREZ 9, RODOLFO RS000700015000 000349 00 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 ADVANCE REP HOUSING 2,960.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 2,960.00 0000157 POWER STAFFING SOLUTIONS INC 10241 000356 00 08/05/2004 101-3001.-451.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 883.60 10144 000353 00 08/OS/2004 101-5002-424.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 482.40 10240 000355 00 08Z05Z2004 101-5002-424.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 643.20 10146 000354 00 08Z05Z2004 101-7002•-431.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 361.08 10239 000351 00 08/05/2004 101-7006-431.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 11095.12 10143 000352 00 08/05/2004 101-7006-431.10-05 CONTRACT SVC 856.44 VENDOR TOTAL * 4,321.84 0001050 RAMIREZ &, BRENDA RSGO0700019000 000357 00 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 ADVANCE PAYMENT 2,425.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 2,425.00 0601051 TROUSDELL, GREG 3/04 7/04 000358 00 08/05/2004 101-6002-463.51-03 MILEAGE REIMB 48.75 VENDOR TOTAL * 48.75 0000067 5649188 VERIZON 7/04 000350 00 08/05/2004 101-4002.-415.41-22 PHONE SVC- 91.22 5643127 7/04 000359 00 08Z05Z2004 101-4002-415.41-22 PHONE SVC 3,108.65 7759664 7/04 000360 00 08/05/2004 101-4002-415.41-22 PHONE SVC 46.45 7710955 7/04 000361 00 08Z05Z2004 101-4002-415.41-22 PHONE SVC 27.95 5640096 7/04 000362 00 08/05/2004 101-4002-415.41-22 PHONE SVC 328.03 3453331 7/04 000363 00 08/05/2004 246-9002-703.5-1-68 PHONE.SVC 59.38 VENDOR TOTAL * 3,661.68 TOTAL EXPENDITURES **** 85,095.53 10,856.26- GRAND TOTAL *********** 74,239.27 PREPARED.08/05/2004, 12:00:20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER ACCOUNTING PERIOD PAGE 1 2005/02 i PROGRAM: GM346L CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 10 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ---------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER ---------------_----------------------------------------------------------- P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59697 938 BATURONI, SONIA 000364 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 500.00 500.00 * 500.00 I BANK/CHECK TOTAL 500.00 500.00 ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 500.00 500.00 PREPARED 08[05/2004, 11:32:28 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 1 } PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 08/05/2004 CHECK DATE: 08/05/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0000938 BATURONI, SONIA RSGO0700008000 000364 00 08/05/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 PMT PORCH MOBILE HOME 500.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 500.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES **** 500.00 GRAND TOTAL *********** 500.00 i i lw . �W PREPARED07/29/2004, 12:19:00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2005/01 PROGRAM: CITY -OF GM346L LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 9 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK -----------------------=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER NO P.O. DATE NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME 59656 657 BAZQUEZ &, ERNEST 000284 07/30/2004 4011-1737-551.45-10 3,500.00 31500.00 * 3,500.00 59657 1037 BELTRAN 9, JOSE 000285 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 33,365.00 33,365.00 * 33,365.00 59658 1038 BLANCARTE 9, JOSE 000286 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 2,000.00 2,000.00 * 2,000.00 i 59659 91 BRODSKY, SHELDON 000287 07/30/2004 101-3,001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59660 133 CALPERS LONG-TERM CARE PR PR0730 07/30/2004 101-0000-209.49-00 93.27 93.27 * 93.27 59661 439 COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANC 00028.8 07/30/2004 101-1004-413.52-04 27,135.04 27,135.04 * 27,135.04 59662 268 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI 000289 07/30/2004 401-1720-551.45-01 237.16 237.16 * 237.16 59663 659 DAVENPORT 9, MARVIN 000291 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 5,000.00 5,000.00 * 5,000.00 59664 966 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & C 000290 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 37.00 37.00 * 37.00 59665 1039 DESERT EMPIRE MOVING 000292 07/30/2004 401-1710-551.74-01 11,199.00 11,199.00 * 11,199.00 59666 755 EMERY &, WILLIAM 000293 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 21,254.00 21,254.00 * 21,254.00 59667 939 EMERY LANDCLEARING & GRAD 000294 07/30/2004 401-1710-551.45-01 133,556.42 133,556.42 * 133,556.42 59668 1040 FLANDERS PAINTING 000295 07/30/2004. 501-0000-511.43-79 7,94.0.00 7,940.00 * 7,940.00 59669 506 GASSMAN, ANDREA 000296 07/30/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59670 367 GENOVESE, THOMAS P 000297 07/30/2004 101-1002=413.51-01 27.00 27.00 * 27.00 59671 504 HACKNEY, EDWARD T 000298 07/30/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 I� 3 4V 59672 1041 HEIL, RICHARD 000299 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 2,000.00 2,000.00 * 2,000.00 W . .p PREPARED07/29/20041 12:19:00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER ACCOUNTING PAGE 2 PERIOD 2005/01 PROGRAM• CITY OF Gii�4346L LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 9 i BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO --TOTAL_ 59673 315 LA QUINTA CHAMBER OF COMM 000300 07/30/2004 101-1001-411.51-01 1,100.00 1,100.00 * 1,100.00 59674 1042 LANE, CHARLENE H. 000301 07/30/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59675 505 LEIDNER, ROBERT 000302 07/30/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59676 101 LEWIS, TOM 000303 07/30/2004 101-4001-415.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59677 1043 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 000304 07/30/2004 101-1004-413.53-05 31193.00 3,193.00 * 3,193.00 59678 96 LOUDON, ELSE 000305 07/30/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59679 1044 LUPERCIO 9, MARIA 000306 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 6,000.00 61000.00 * 6,000.00 59680 102 MAHFOUD, CYRILLE P 000308 07/30/2004 101-4001-415.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59681 776 MARSHALL, SAM 0 000310 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 5,300.00 5,300.00 * 5,300.00 ! 59682 1045 MARTINEZ, RAMON 000309 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 8,000.00 8,000.00 * 8,000.00 59683 248 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES 000307 07/30/2004 101-4002-415.41-25 227.47 227.47 * 227.47 50684 99 OLANDER, MILTON 000311 07/30/2004 101-4001-415.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59685 902 PEREZ, FRANCISCO & LUZ 000312 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 2,000.00 2,000.00 * 2,000.00 59686 157 POWER STAFFING SOLUTIONS 000313 000314 07/30/2004 07/30/2004 101-5002-424.10-05 101-3001-451.10-05 643.20 795.24 1,438.44 * 1,438.44 59687 97 REYNOLDS, ELAINE 000315 07/30/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59688 1035 SEDONA HOMES 07/30/2004 101-0000-228.10-00 11,680.00 11,680.00 * 11,680.00 59689 49 SPRINT 000317 07/30/2004 101-4002-415.41-22 737.65 w I Vl PREPARED07/29/2004, 12:19:00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER ACCOUNTING PERIOD PAGE 3 2005/01 PROGRAM• GH346L CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 9 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------;------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 59689 49 SPRINT 737.65 * 737.65 59690 50 ST JOHNS, VICTORIA 000316 07/30/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 59691 1046 SUAREZ &, ARMANDO 000318 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 8,250.00 8,250.00 * 8,250.00 59692 56 TIME WARNER CABLE 000319 07/30/2004 502-0000-512.30-03 89.95 000320 07/30/2004 502-0000-512.30-03 699.95 789.90 * 789.90 59693 1003 TOSCANO, ATENOGENES 000321 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 13,475.00 13,475.00 * 13,475.00 59694 943 VALENZUELA &, RUFINO 000322 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 9,630.06 9,630.06 * 9,630.06 59695 1009 VISTA DUNES MOBILE HOME P 000323 07/30/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 366.96 * 366.96 366.96 59696 162 WEISS, MARK 000324 07/30/2004 405-9001-702.51-01 41.00 41.00 * 41.00 BANK/CHECK TOTAL ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 320,398.37 320,398.37 320,398.37 320,398.37 PREPARED 07L29/2004, 12:00:33 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 07/30/2004 CHECK DATE: 07/30/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR.NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0000657 BAZQUEZ &, ERNEST VISTA DUNES 000284 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 ADV REPL HOUSING/BAZQUEZ 3,500.00 0001037 BELTRAN &, JOSE VISTA DUNES 000285 00 07/29/2004 0001038 BLANCARTE &, JOSE VISTA DUNES 000286 00 07/29/2004 0000091 BRODSKY, SHELDON 7/8/04 MTG 000287 00 07/29/2004 0000133 CALPERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 20040730 PR0730 00 07/30/2004 0000439 COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANCE 109607 000288 00 07/29/2004 0000268 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIST 507191 482 0 0 000289 00 07/29/2004 0000659 DAVENPORT &, MARVIN VISTA DUNES #65000291 00 07/29/2004 0000966 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY VISTA DUNES 000290 00 07/29/2004 0001039 DESERT EMPIRE MOVING 46175 JEFFERSON000292 00 07/29/2004 l 0000755 EMERY &, WILLIAM VISTA DUNES 000293 00 07/29/2004 0000939 EMERY LANDCLEARING & GRADING INC JEFFERSON ST 00'0294 00 07/29/2004 0001040 FLANDERS PAINTING 07/26/04 000295 00 07/29/2004 W CST VENDOR TOTAL * 3,500.00 401-1737-551.45-10 ADV REPL HOUSING/BELTRAN 33,365.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 331365.00 401-1737-551.45-10 ADV REPL HOUSNG/BLANCARTE 2,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 2,000.00 101-3001-451.10-10 CULTURAL ARTS CONN 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 101-0000-209..49-00 PAYROLL SUMMARY 93.27 VENDOR TOTAL * 93.27 101-1004-413.52-04 AUTO PHYS DAMAGE/PROP INS 27,135.04 VENDOR TOTAL * 27,135.04 401-1720-551.45-01 #93 FIRE STN IRRIG METER 237.16 VENDOR TOTAL * 2.37.16 401-1737-551.45-10 ADV REPL HOUSNG/DAVENPORT 5,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 5,000.00 401-1737-551.45-10 REGISTRATION FEE/WILEY#16 37.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 37.00 401-1710-551.74-01 RES MOVING EXPENSE/FEACK 11,199.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 11,199.00 401-1737-551.45-10 HOUSING EXP/EMERY SP#60 21,254.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 21,254.00 401-1710-551.45-01 DEMOLITION/8 HOMES 133,556.42 VENDOR TOTAL * 133,556.42 501-0000-511.43-79 SR CTR EXTERIOR PAINT 7,940.00 PREPARED 07/29/2004, 12:00:33 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 2 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 07/30/2004 CHECK DATE: 07/30/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND,NO INVOICE VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO } ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NO DATE NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0001040 FLANDERS PAINTING VENDOR TOTAL * 7,940.00 0000506 GASSMAN, ANDREA 7/8/04 MTG 000296 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 CULTURAL ARTS COMM 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0000367 REIMB GENOVESE, THOMAS P 000297 00 07/29/2004 101-1002-413.51-01 7/22/04 LUNCH MEETING 27.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 27.00 0000504 7/12/04 HACKNEY, EDWARD T MTG 000298 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 COMM SVCS COMMISSION 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0001041 VISTA DUNES HEIL, RICHARD 000299 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10_ ADV REPL HOUSNG/HEIL SP31 2,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 2,000.00 '0000315 LA QUINTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REG/7TH ANNUAL 000300 00 07/29/2004 101-1001-411.51-01 MAYORS CUP GOLF CHALLENGE 1,100.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 1,100.00 0001042 LANE, CHARLENE H. 7/8/04 MTG 000301 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 CULTURAL ARTS COMM 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0000505 7/12/04 LEIDNER, ROBERT MTG 000302 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 COMM SVCS COMMISSION 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0000101 7/14/04 LEWIS, TOM MTG 000303 00 07/29/2004 101-4001-415.10-10 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0001043 43680 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 000304 00 07/29/2004 101-1004-413.53-05 CV EMP REL CONSORTIUM 3,193.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 3,193.00 0000096 7/8/04 MTG i LOUDON, ELSE 000305 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 75.00 { VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0001044 LUPERCIO 9, MARIA VISTA DUNE SP41000306 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 ADV HOUSNG EXP/LUPERCIO 6,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 6,000.00 0000102 7/14/04 MAHFOUD, CYRILLE P MTG 000308 00 07/29/2004 101-4001-415.10-10 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 000776 MARSHALL, SAM 0 PREPARED O7L29/2004, 12:00:33 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 3 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF:.07/30/2004 CHECK DATE: 07/30/2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO VENDOR NAME INVOICE VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK/DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO NO NO -------------------------------------- DATE. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ---- 0000776 MARSHALL, SAM 0 VISTA DUNES 000310 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 HOUSING EXP/MARSHALL #26 5,300.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 5,300.00 0001045 MARTINEZ, RAMON VISTA DUNES 000309 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 HOUSING EXP/MARTINEZ #55 8,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 8,000.00 0000248 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES 1000085795 000307 00 07/29/2004 101-4002-415.41-25 SATELLITE PHONE 227.47 j VENDOR TOTAL * 227.47 0000099 OLANDER, MILTON 7/14/04 MTG 000311 00 07/29/2004 101-4001-415.10-10 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0000902 PEREZ, FRANCISCO VISTA DUNES 000312 LUZ 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 HOUSING EXP/PEREZ SP#17 2,000.00 i VENDOR TOTAL * 21000..00 0000157 POWER STAFFING SOLUTIONS INC 10145 000314 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-05 TEMP STAFFING/N TRENT 795.24 10047 000313 00 07/29/2004 101-50027424.10-05 TEMP STAFFING/J KELLY 643.20 VENDOR TOTAL * 11438.44 0000097 REYNOLDS, ELAINE 7/8/04 MTG 000315 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 75.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0001035 SEDONA HOMES TR 30125-1 00 07/27/2004 101-0000-228.10-00 REFUND DEP/PROD 261-083 11,680.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 11,680.00 0000049 SPRINT 843721584 000317 00 07/29/2004 101-4002-415.41-22 PHONE SVC 737:65 VENDOR TOTAL * 737.65 0000050 ST JOHNS, VICTORIA 7/12/04 MTG 000316 00 07/29/2004 101-3001-451.10-10 CONN SVCS COMMISSION 75.00 i VENDOR TOTAL * 75.00 0001046 SUAREZ &, ARMANDO VISTA DUNES 000318 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 HOUSING EXP/SUAREZ SP#20 8,250.00 VENDOR TOTAL.* 8,250.00 0000056 TIME WARNER CABLE 0277799 000319 00 07/29/2004 502-0000-512.30-03 INTERNET ACCESS 89.95 0178583 000320 00 07/29/2004 502-0000-512.30-03 INTERNET ACCESS 699.95 VENDOR TOTAL * 789.90 c.4 001003 TOSCANO, ATENOGENES i PREPARED 07(29/2004; 12:00:33 EXPENDITURE APPROVAL LIST PAGE 4 PROGRAM: GM339L AS OF: 07/30/2004 CHECK DATE: 07/30/2004. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VEND NO INVOICE VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. BNK CHECK�DUE ACCOUNT ITEM EXPENDITURE HAND -ISSUED NO -------------------------------------- NO NO DA E --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0001003 VISTA DUNES TOSCANO, ATENOGENES 000321 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 HOUSING EXP/TOSCANO SP#93 13,475.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 13,475.00 0000943 VISTA DUNES VALENZUELA 9, RUFINO 000322 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 HOUSNG EXP/VALENZUELA #44 9,630.06 VENDOR TOTAL * 9,630.06 0001009 VISTA DUNES VISTA DUNES MOBILE HOME PARK 000323 00 07/29/2004 401-1737-551.45-10 RENT OWED FOR SP#04 366.96 VENDOR TOTAL * 366.96 0000162 j REIMB WEISS, MARK 000324 00 07/29/2004 405-9001-702.51-01 LUNCH MEETING 41.00 VENDOR TOTAL * 41.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES **** 320,398.37 GRAND TOTAL *********** 320,398.37 i PREPARED 08[05/2004, 9:29:36 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFOR-NIA PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GH313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 17 GROUP NUMBER 00218 VOID,CHECK'GROUP. ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 02/2005 GROUP USER ID PPARKER GROUP CREATED BY PPARKER GROUP UPDATED BY ------- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PPARKER TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR'MAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS DISC/RETAINAGE -------------------------------------------------- 100 08/05/2004 000132 00 101-7005-431.56-52 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0000817 DESERT PIPE & SUPPLY 1166742 439.62- SUPPLIES 00/00/0000 0059556 .07/27/2004 N 200 08/05/2004 000133 00 101-5001-424.34-04 0000817 DESERT PIPE & SUPPLY 20182920 166.64- PARCEL UPDATES 00/00/0000 0059556 07/27/2004 N GROUP TOTALS COUNT • 2 AMOUNT: 606.26- i PREPARED 0805 2004, 8:56:59 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA PAGE 1 16 PROGRAM: GN4136 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER GROUP NUMBER 00211 VOID CHECK GROUP ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 01/2005 GROUP USER ID PPARKER GROUP CREATED BY PPARKER GROUP UPDATED BY PPARKER ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE INVOICE NUMBER LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i 100 08/05/2004 005238 00 101-5000-342.82-00 0001010 CAPITAL PACIFIC HOMES, LL TR24890-4 2,250.00- REFUND PLAN CK FEES 00/00/0000 0059535 07/27/2004 N 200 08/05/2004 005239 00 401-1710-551.45-01 0001010 CAPITAL PACIFIC HOMES, LL 04-1296 4,500.00- JEFFERSON ST APPRAISAL 00/00/0000 0059535 07/27/2004 N 300 08/05/2004 005240 00 401-1710-551.45-01 0001010 CAPITAL PACIFIC HOMES, LL 04-1298 3,500.00- JEFFER-SON ST APPRAISAL 00/00/0000 0059535 07/27/2004 N GROUP TOTALS COUNT: 3 AMOUNT: 10,250.00- v D r+ a� 3 CD r+ 0) N CD C4 CD 0 r+ r- 0 p -- i O 0 N rn 0 O N CD cc rn 0 0 L _ 0 O N c � 3 �. a 0 0 v 0 r+ 0 0 — cr cr cD r+ 0 0 N 3 rn � �a rn r+ P+ N 3 0 0 N r+ m 3� 3 CDN a X '0 c CD CL c a� CD Nct 0 •v' r•+ a rn rn c m N rn 0 N 0 — n. 0-3 ., --n N• -o r+ N 00 N 0 3 n CD 0 O ='3.a) 0 D) 0 0 c <� n rn 0 a �< CD3� wCD � = O r+ n 0005+ O N C N O CD O N 0 (a rn+ O O � a 00 cn :. O CA) m O 44h cn3 m N Co r+ r+ 0 N 3 3 CD CD a �. °, a �• 0 CD 00 n 7 00 cn 3, r+ 0 1 N CD N rn 0 r+ CL a L (D O N 0 0 r+ s CD n r+ 0 r CD p r+ a) rn 0 CD N a p m 0 m v 0 z a N z c-3 3. A c '~ O rt CD CD o °� 0� � 1A z CD t7 N > CD 0 D cc c N r+ N 0 CCDD W 3 O = r i p 5, O 3 �. �. o N � CD �. 0 •v 5 =r 3 a 0m o mCDM im O 0 c°1 °' °- m N (n c N c 0 0 N n CD mCD CD a CD c 'a cv =r m 7 O O3 N CD CD n a a C m 3 m -, CD a m m m -a o N c, d o m r. mCCD -aa o m 90 CDa m CL 3:w ym C 0 •a= mm omi m .� fu cai m CD CD << 0 .-. a m a = CD n =r 7 Cn m m CD m a•co 3 °' m o y m rn m N a cr N m O 01cn j 0 ;4: •v N � m c. = 3 NC O � d =r a N N C O O 3 3 cn m m 0 3 O m N N N O N < N = a Q << 7 CCp S1 y N m c c 3 o CDCD Qa d 0in . a�0'C=D XWan CD ..`< C o 0 3 r CL CD CD Q CD m =r c. �m0 �Qo°1 m o — 0 F s =or MOx@ d �ml< C O a 01 inRL C _� (D ;:o,.,.. c ��•N O O 3 A ~�mQ. 3 cu CD Cn y► 01 O :3 mm �m CD CD N 0 a m .mK..O3 3 n N X C �m3o- a .% ID Z=0 CD m o C aC �► � CD %CL R 3 ��� N E 0 T7 " D) W N C0wDc a co a. N CD N O L N m N " v N N WODN pN OOCo O W O O IV W O A W N 0-P6 v O � A OD (D N 7 CA IV O Cn ? - Cr Co A. O CA O O 0 -4 0 o � O W � W T CO V O OD W L Co o -N 0 W OD 000' a O N ? 0 Z 0 � � y b9 in N Q OD N 0000 0 c m 000 cl 4 O L 0 tn 0) m O v co CD � .69 co WCA vNO� CA N -I -I 7 a N-+ W A60 O ODOo.060) OOD 000)D W A6 C1� OW NNOODD� n OD -I 0 " Cfl W 7 �-�OCo CA � ? m 0 LOD CA O -INO.1h, CD OD O O NOC�D�O.A m m D C O Oo m w m O o ai 52. m D -i 0 r m m �r � c 0)m p 7 N N 0 =y c 0 � -op CD A p C O 0 -n r_ 0 5 a m o C- c m o a 2 Mm Q. m W o 0 O 5. 3 N 0 m %0 O nA� a m 0 5. CO SD N O N C c N m N O w n N O 0 N N a r� mr ;& (D N N N C � a- va O N CD D 0 2 m Z I N CITY OF LA CUINTA AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS AND DIVERSIFICATION Juror 30, 2004 The City Treasurer will be permitted to invest in the following types of investments subject to the maximum percentage compliance limits and bid process requirements: AN maturities must be less than the maximum allowed. Type of Investments ChockWSavinas and other time accounts Certificate of Deposits, with interest ea s paid monthly. U.S. Treasury Bills Ships, Notes and Bonds. Securities ( except any collateralized mortgage obligation (CMO) or structured note which contains embedded rate options): - Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) - Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) - Federal Home Loan Bank Notes & Bonds (FHLB) - Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) Prime Commercial Paper Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Money market mutual funds regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and whose portfolio consists only of US Agency Securities maintaining a par vakue per share of $1. Investment A reements for bond proceeds and/or reserve funds. Total AN Funds Maximum AN Funds Actual % AN Funds Over Under 85% 0.41 %-64.59% 60% 0.00%-60.00% 100% 70.58% -29.42% 100% 7,500,000 7.500,000 7.500,000 7.500.0001 14.68% $ 5,000,000 7,370,000 7,500,000 7 500 000 Na 2,500,000 130,000 $30,000,000 27,370,000 2,630, 000 30% 0.00% -30.00% 25% 11.07% -13.93% 60% 3.27% -56.73% WA 0.00% WA 100.00% Annualized Earnings of Pooled Cash Investments 1.688% Annualized Earnings of Fiscal Agent Investments 0.47A Annualized Earnings of AN Investments 1.616% j Sic Month Treasury BE Rate 1.725% L-it Surplus Maximum Su*n % Surplus Over Under 95% 0.03%-84.97% 60% 0.00%-60.00% 100% 70.84% 100% 7,500,000 7,500.000 7,500,000 7,500,000 14.74% $ 5,000,000 7,370,000 7,500,000 7,500, 000 We 2,500,000 130,000 $30,000,000 $27,370,000 $2,6W.000 30% 0.00% -30.00% 100% 11.11 % -88.89% 20% 3.27% -16.73% WA 0.00% N/A 100.00% - Restrictions Maximum Ma Credit Quality Exceptions <= 99 000 ver institution 2 Years FDIC Insured None <=$99.000 per Institution 2 years FDIC Insured None Except no more than $5 million may be Invested over 2 vears 5 years None Restricted to per4ssuer limits below: 100% $7.5 million $7.5 million $7.5 million $7.5 million 2 years None 15% Addition 15% WAM <=31 000 000 Der Issuer 90 days Standard & Poors/Moodys A-1 P-1 None $40,000,000 per account Utilize DVP 2 years Unrated None Maintain $1 per share per value. Utilize DVP 60 days AAA by two of three rating None agencies or assets of $500 million and investor SEC licensed > 5 yrs None City of La tuna Summary of Holdings City. Redevel n art Agency and Fnandng A -Ity .hams CNtr C3� 004 ash i bvssbnaMe� Bank AaauMs Interest Accrued Unrealized me" Name -A Surplus TWO Rank Rate Book Interest -Gain Loss Vane Bank Web Fargo - Osn a nd Yes Checking 1 0.00% S 711.334 WA WA S 711,334 i 3.592,442 Patty Cash- Demand No WA 1 WA 1,000 WA WA 1,000 1.000 Waits F - Dwrwnd Yes Checkiry 1 0.00% 54,279 WA WA 54,279 61,991 Total - Bank Account S 766.613 $ 766,6131 S 3,655,433 U. S. Gmernmend Seetrb" Custodian - Avallolftr sumplus Issuer/Twe Rank Discount/ Rate ArlwrBud Value Accrued Invest Unrealized Gan loss Market Value Days to Maturity Par Value Seto~ Data Mapaky Dale Original Days to Maturity Yield to Maturity Merkel Value source Bank of New York - Demand Yes FAR14 CREW 1 1.100% 5.075.797 S 80.729 (14,659) S 5.141,667 218 $ 5,000.000 1/14142004 2/12006 382 1.289% Bank of New York Bank of New York - Dernand Yes FARM CREDR Diraourd 1 1.040% 2,497.989 (11.361) 2,486,628 28 2.500,000 v2artoa MJW2004 181 1.063% Banc of New Yak Banc of New Yak - DenwM Yes FHB 1 3.875% 2,021,734 3,229 (1,109) 2,023,854 168 2,000.000 1013Wr00.1 12115rJO0e 411 1.471% Beak of New York Bank of New Yak - Demand Yes F1e.e 1 1.230% 2.030,928 $ 36,438 (5,303) 2,062,063 196 2,000.000 tn3r10a 1/142006 357 1.231% Bank of New Yak Bank of New York - Demand Yes FKA 1 4.125% 2.372.553 16,788 (1,812) 2.357.529 230 2,370.000 1212r2003 21ts2006 441 1.700% Bank of New Yak Bank of New Yak • Demand Yea Ft1Le 1 1.875% 1,019.342 15,408 (3,717) 1.031,033 237 1,000,000 W32004 22amm 398 1.271% Bank of New Yak Bank of New Yak - Demand Yes Fw4A4D.00m.4 1 3.875% 4,967,463 (42.389) 4.925,074 191 5,000,000 01*32004 vrr2oo6 350 1.282% Bank of New Yak Bank of New Yak - Derwd Yes FreddNM.c 1 1.875% 7 528 045 59 786 (21,357 7,564,454 199 7,5000 iramor m620as 352 1.228% Banc of New Yak Total - U.S. Government Securities S 27 511,851 S 212,358 S 101 907 S 27 822,302 S 27,370 000 U. S. Treasury Notes Custodian - A S Isstwrr Ran Discount/ Rate Amortized Value Accrued Interest Unrealized Gan Loss Market Value Days to Mat Pa Value SeBlanent Date MNrlty u Date 0110kal Days to Yield to Me" Value Source Bank of Now York m k - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.875% 5.010.742 23.373 (4,492) 5.029,623 92 5.000,000 e3r312da a3012oa 163 1.011% Sank of Nov York Bank ofNew York -Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note / 1.250% 4,977,659 5,123 (12,034) 4,970,748 335 5,000,000 62a1001 613tn006 388 1.745% Bank of Now Yak Bank of Now York - Demerd Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.125% 4,952,474 2.214 4,954,WS 365 5,000,000 - 624/20a al30rto06 371 2.093% Bank ofNew York Bank of Now York •Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.625% 5,009,212 20,201 (48,712) 4,982,701 457 5,000,000 td162000 a/3trtoo6 718 1.778% Bank ofNew York Banc of Now Yak - Gernand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.625% 3,9W.063 10,893 (15.063) 3,975.893 468 4.000.000 111t3edm lorstr M 718 2.006% Bank of New Yak Bank d New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.625% 5,014,844 13.579 (58,594) 4,959,829 488 5,000.000 10131/2003 1e/3t2006 731 1.853% Bank of New Yak Bank of New York • Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.675% 4.982.405 7,685 (16,780) 4.973,310 518 5,000,000 6na2oo4 ttrmaeo6a 551 2.129% Bank d New Yak Bank of New Yak • Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.875% 3.959,449 6,801 3.966.250 549 4.000.000 Oa30200t 12r31NM 549 2.570% Bank d New York Bank d New York - Demand Yes U.S. Trots Note 1 2.500% 5 003 372 10 248 20 4 993 059 7W 5,000000 COMMON 5/3112008 729 2.464% Bank d New York Teal - U.S. T S 42 890,220 S 91,0991 3 165 219 S 42,818 100 $ 43,000 000 Local Agency Investment Fund Interest Accrued lnmreali:abls Market Days to Actual Management Statutory Management Name - AvailabilitySu T Rank Rate Book Interest Gain/ Loss Value Mat Fees Fees Mowed WF - City - Dennand Yes State Pod WA 1.44% $ 14,225,207 WA I WA WA 1 .47 of1 % - Otr ending 8/30/04 .50 of1% LAN- RDA - Demand Yes State Pod WA 1.44% 6524,262 WA WA WA 1 .47 of 1 % - Otr WKXM 6r30/04 .50 Of 1 % Total • State Pool 1 20.749 469 Total CRY bwesbnvnte Total City Cash & bwasbment IS $1 151 S 303,457 16 1297.1201 WA S 91918153 IS 303A57 1 t 267126 NIA 4A city Of La alms Summary of Holdings City. Rodw.wwniont Agency ad Financing Aulhorky June 30.2004 Fiscal Attimst Ywesdnerets Porlfolo - RDA oveskenenb Custodian - Availability SUIOA lesuedi Rank Interest Ras ArrwriaW Value Accrued Interest Umembed Gain(Lou)Velw Market Days to Matufft Par Value Settlement Darla MaturMy Deb Oripkal Days to kbbxoty Yield to Maturity Market Valve Source 2W2 RDA U.S. Bar*CIP Yes U.S.Treasury BE 1 1.640% t 27,776,729 t t (5,209) t 27,T71,520 176 t 20.000.000 06124/04 12123104 182 1.6767% U.S.Bank 2003 Taxable RDA U.S. Banc CIP Yes U.S.Trowury as 1 1.235% 6,979.810 (1,160) 6.978A W 85 7.000.000 0612404 09/29104 91 1.2561% U.S.Banc 2004 Finance Author ft -COP Yes U.S.Trsasury On 1 1.355% 9,965,654 146 9.966.000 92 10,000,000 06129M OW30/04 93 1.3776% U.S.Bank 2004 Finance Auftft COP Yes U.S.Trenwv Bit 1 1.675% 44,641,238 (8,4381 44 800 176 45,000,0W 08/30/04 12123M4 176 1.8808% U.S.6anlcc Total - U.S. T t 89,363,631 t (14,881 t $9 348 970 t 90,000,000 Portfolio - Money Mild MuWY Funds Trustee - Avalsbfty Surplus Haney Market LbAusl Fund Rank Rate Book Accrued Interest Umeakzable Las Market Value Days to Me^ Bond Issue mw"wr-d Fees Civic Cemer U.S.Banc - Project Yes 1st American 1 0.473% t WA t t 1 19M City Hal Revenue Balls .40% of Average Day Civic Center U.S.Bank - Debt Svc Yes 1 st American 1 0.473% 6 WA 6 1 1996 City Hall Revenue Bonds 1994 RDA U.S. Bank -Debt Svc Yes tsl American 1 0.473% 23 WA 23 1 1994 Series Bonds -RDA 1 1995 RDA U.S.Bank - COP Yes 1st American 1 0.473% WA 1 1995 Housing Bonds - RDA 1 & 2 1995 RDA U.S.Banc - Special Fund Yes 1st American 1 0.473% 22 WA 22 1 1995 Housing Bands - RDA 111, 2 2004 Fin AWm -1995 US Sank - Escrow Yes 1st Arorican 1 0.473% 101 WA 101 1 2004 Firisncimg Authority 1998 RDA U.S.Bw* - COP Yes 1st American 1 0.473% WA 1 1998 Series Bonds - RDA 1 1998 RDA U.S.Bamk - Obt Svc Yes let American 1 0.473% 16 WA 16 1 1998 Series Bads - RDA 2 1998 ROA U.S."ilt • Special Fund Yes 1st American 1 0.473% 6 WA 6 1 1995 Housing Bala - RDA 1 6 2 1996 RDA U.S.Banc - COP Yes 1st Annerieen 1 0.473% WA 1 1998 Series Bonds - RDA 2 2001 RDA U.S. Banc - Obt Svc Yes 1 it American 1 0.473% 46 WA 46 1 2001 Series Bonds - RDA 1 2001 RDA U.S. Banc - COP Yes 1st Amerim 1 0.473% WA 1 2001 Serle Bads - RDA 1 2002 RDA U.S. Banc - Obt Svc Yes 1st American 1 0.473% 36 WA 36 1 2002 Series Bonds • RDA 1 2002 RDA U.S. Bank - COP Yes 1st Arorioan 1 0.473% 1,495.332 WA 1.495.332 1 2002 Series Bads - RDA 1 2003 Taxable RDA U.S. Bank - DS Yes 1st Anedcan 1 0.473% 70 WA 70 1 2003 Series Bads - RDA 1 2003 Taxable RDA U. S. Ban -W Yes 1st American 1 0.473% WA - 1 2003 Series Bonds - RDA 1 nkC 2003 Taxable RDA U. S. BaIP Yes 1st American 1 0.473% 1,510,636 WA 1,510,638 1 2003 Series Bands - RDA 1 2004 Fin Auth US Bank - COP Yes 1st American 1 0.473% 3,049,868 WA 3,049,888 1 2004 Financing Ault" 2004 Fin Ruth US Bank - COI Yes 1 at American 1 0.473% 55 000 WA 55 000 1 2004 F Subtobl -Mutual Furl i 6115'iZ t t t 3,008 294 Total Fiscal Agent Inverib ne nb Grand Total Average Matwlty t 95A74.913 16 i (14.661)1 i 82 t 187 392 968 16 303.457 1 i IMAM WA 234 D Ul City of La Quinta Summary of Investment Activities City, Redevelopment Agency and Financing Authority June 30, 2004 Investments Purchased Yield Name Type Principal Date to Maturity Par Checking & Savings - Net Change Checking & Savings $ 394,414 N/A N/A N/A LAIF - CITY State Pool 3,800,000 LAW - RDA State Pool - U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Note 5,000,000 6/01/2004 2.464% 5,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Bill 7,000,000 6/24/2004 1.256% 7,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Bill 10,000,000 6/29/2004 1.378% 10,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Bill 45,000,000 6/30/2004 1.681 % 45,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Bill 28,000,000 6/24/2004 1.677% 28,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Note 5,000,000 6/24/2004 2.093% 5,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Note 4,000,000 6/30/2004 2.570% 4,000,000 Mutual Funds - Net Change U.S. Treasury Mutual Funds 3,716,892 N/A -+ N/A N/A Total Investments Purchased 111,911,306 1 ___ I Investments Sold/Matured Yield Name Type Principal Date to Maturity Par Checking & Savings - Net Change Checking & Savings - LAIF - CITY State Pool 12,300,000 FNMA Discount GSE 2,500,000 6/23/2004 1.125% 2,500,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Note 5,000,000 6/01/2004 3.285% 5,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Bill 5,000,000 6/23/2004 0.991 % 5,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Note 4,000,000 6/30/2004 1.090% 4,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Bill 28,065,000 6/24/2004 0.923% 28,065,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U. S. Treasury Bill 9,021,000 6/24/2004 0.923% 9,021,000 LAW - RDA - Net Change State Pool - Mutual Funds - Net Change - Totai Investments Sold/Matured 65,886,000 Unamortized Premium/Discount Change $716,505 Investment Change Prior Month Ending Balance 42084165 $ 1,, Plus: Investments Purchased 06 111,91111,306 Less: Investments Sold (65,886,000) Unamortized Premium/Discount change 716,505 Month Ending Balance $ 187,392 966 G i City of La Quinta Distribution of Cash & Investments & Balances June 30, 2004 Distribution of Cash & Investments city Totals General Fund $ 27,694,722 Gas Tax Fund 408.042 Quimby Fund 592.809 k*astructure Fund 1,143,396 Village Parking Fund 10,575,063 Special Revenue 761,725 k*mwt Fund 131.772 Capital Project Fund AD 2000-1 Construction Fund 840.279 AD 97-1 Constriction Fund 450,706 Equipment Replacement Fund 2,612,332 Information Technology Fund 472.060 Landscape & Lighting Fund Trust & Agency Funds 1982 129 Subtotal $ 47,665,035 Redevelopment Agency Totals Project Area 1 Project Area 2 Capital Improvement Funds 51,774,486 59,502,116 $ 111,276.602 Debt Service Funds 16.135,185 5.021,699 21,156,884 Low & Moderate Income Funds 1 588 670 5 645 763 7,234,433, Subtotal $ 69 98,341 $ 70,169,578 $ 139 667,919 Financing Authority Totals Project Funds 55,000 Debt Service Funds 5,012 - Subtotal $ 60,012 Total $ 187,392,966 Cash Balances Type July 03 August S October November December January 04 February March Agd May June Cash & Investments $ (204,843) $ (280.692) _ (115,765) $ 117,749 $ 171,712 $ 393,313 $ 240,310 $ 75,139 $ (102,723) $ (1,17805) $ 372,199 $ 766,613 State Pool 24,654.884 16,754,884 17,104,884 26,370,608 25,620,608 26,195,608 28.941,285 32,441,285 33,441.285 28,949,469 29,249,469 20,749.469 U.S. Treasury Bills/Notes 57,039,588 57,062,903 67,063,477 72,131,024 72,128,268 69.930.924 79,951,640 69,982,902 70,031,843 70.056,768 80,039,567 132,253,851 U.S. Goverment Sec rides 27,364,415 27,390,175 27,415,104 27,494,166 27.513,320 27,392,009 30,094,727 30,078,982 30,061.700 30,045,439 30,028,640 27,511,851 Prime Commercial Paper - - - - - - - - - - - - Mutual Funds 1,016,899 7,405,448 16133 778 1 372,093 1 372,9871 2 497 708 2 497 970 7131 996 2,392,507 2 393 434 2 394 290 6111 182 Total 109,870,943 108,332,718 127 601478 126,485,640 125,806,895 1 $126,409,5621 $ 141,725,932 139,710,3041 $ 135,824,612 130,266,225 142 084165 187,392,966 Type July 02 August September October November December January 03 February March May June Cash & l vesbTw is $ 4,083,824 $ 866,921 $ 677.838 $ (446,287) $ (846,332) $ 810.573 $ 13,420,603 $ (876,960) $ 142,282 (70.251) $ 9,618,934 $ 5,713.527 State Pool 17,959,597 17,959,597 17,159,597 17,678,739 15,978.739 14,478.739 18.675,157 20,175,157 19,175,157 19,766,400 21,766,400 21,266.400 U.S. TreasuryBillsMotes 60,810,462 57,860.891 57,908,893 57,959,841 58,067,570 57,811,616 57,845.604 57.876,305 61,838,372 61,937,980 61,953,600 70,015,083 U.S. Govemrnent Securities 14,8%.525 14,913,219 14,921,162 14,956,4$8 14,973.066 14,989,206 19,858.920 19,876,446 19,896,081 19,915,083 19,908,427 14,929.002 Prime Commercial Paper - - - - - - - 5,997,312 - - - - Mutual Funds 9,736.9W 14 941912 10129 991 9,671,083, 9 515 654 7 827 7 369 670 4,320,215 284,500 91394 16,638 1 1 016 822 Total 107,486,308 106,542,540 100,797,481 99,819,874 97,688,6971 $ 95,917.4331 $ 110169 954 107,368,475 101,336,392 1 101 640 606 113,263,999 112 940 834 City of La Quinta Cash Flow Analysis - v�vv Beginning Cash Balance Actual Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Total YTD Through 6/30/2004 Ju A ust-04 Se tember-04 October-04 November-04 December-04 113,060 017 187,392,965 181,459,150 167,460 524 159146 352 151915,810 1" 900 965 113,060 017 Property Tax/ Tax Increment Transient Occupancy Tax Sales Tax Other revenues 47,315,172 4,261,767 5,240,037 149,239,036 0 201,515 264,693 2.301.133 0 100,758 244,332 1.496.411 0 141,061 366,498 1.340.810 0 181,364 305,415 1.600.762 204,898 322,424 305,415 1.230.697 260,898 342,576 305,415 1,494,302 47,780,968 5,551,465 7,031,806 158.703.151 Revenues 206 056,012 2,767,341 1,841,501 1,848,369 2,087 541 2 063,434 2 403 991 219,067 389 Expenditures Salaries 81 Fringe Benefits Redevelopment Agency Other expenditures Capital Projects 'Debt Service (PrincipaWnterestlPass Through) 6,093,825 7,657,354 17,293,561 42,969,727 57,444,912 862,362 244,226 1,420,911 5,647,000 526,657 574,908 246,852 1,710,851 5,730,000 7.577.516 574,908 246,852 1,717,695 6,954,000 669,085 574,908 477,420 1,707,561 6,391,000 167.195 574,908 243,732 1,711,443 6,381,000 167195 862,362 249,760 1,421,489 5,066,000 167195 10,118,181 9,366,198 26,983,511 79,127,727 66,719,755 Total Expenditures 131,459,380 8,701,156 15,840127 10162,541 9,318 084 9,078 279 71765 806 192 31S 373 Net Revenues/Expenditures 74,696,631 5,933,815 13 998 627 8,314,171 7,230,543 7 014,845 5,352 615 26 752,016 Changes in Assets/Liabilities (263,684) (263,684) Ending Cash Balance 187,392 965 181459150 16T 460,524 159146 352 j 151 915,810 144 900 965 1 139,548,349 139,548,349 Net Change in Cash before Maturing Investments 74,332,948 5,933-815 13,998,627 8-314,171 7,230,543 (7,014,845 5,352,615 26,488,332 1.-. wi P-.h - f`i#- D. 1. rl LAIF _ - MaturiInvestments - Pooled Cash(2.500.000)0(5,000,000 1,982,815 3,724,664 IA,816,159) ,183,841 3,279,543 0 3,063,845 0 1,401,615 2 000 000 Total (517,185) 3,724,664 3,279,543 3,063, 845 598 31% �...iww!-r1 fCw..r•.-.\/I 1.-& ni f`-.h - Cl-w-1 Anant Bond Money Market 3,951,000 3,951,000 3,951,000 3,951,000 3,951,000 3,961,000 Bond Sale Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maturing Investments 0 0 (17,000,000) 0 0 (55,000,000) Debt Service Money Market 0 6,322,963 179,330 0 0 0 Total 3,951,000 10,273,963(12,869,670)3,951,000 3 951 000 (51,049,000 1 i- GA P-.i. 0-1 -. if mw 1--- .4�nf- MRAM r •v vvaw� LAW Balance 20,749,469 21,266,654 17,541,991 18,358,149 15,078,607 12,014,762 12,613,146 Bond Capital Project Money Market 6,055,856 2,104,856 1 (1,846,144) 11,202,856 7,251,856 3,300,856 54,349,856 Debt Service Money Market 55,326 55,326(6,267,637)6 446 967 6 446 967 Ma'or Chanaes in Cash Flow Analysis from Prior Report Revenues: issued $90 million bond issue with $66 net funds received Expenditures: None C." 7 I 00 C6yd L4D.YMm R.aenaa.. of AaW and sww• Fulls CoyR 200a4 aApwray aWfho k,4 A.*-* ,Fan 3D, 2004 Bran of Aawl Funds "197(.392LanPdyasohFunds Lan Ner►Buraw Fouls LekLAF-SK Aaoaals Ps mbie of$450.000 follow of AMMIMP i 32 Dank Aeesrab Wob Ferss•M. POW Cssh - Dwmsnd Dommand N. No Ch dit WA S 711,334 1,000 sld • Ball Aseanb i 7N 913 U. S. TM." - AnnOsd lank of Now Yak - Demnnd Yes U.S. Toll." N.is 6.010,742 wdr Bof Nw Yak • Derwd Yea U.S. Tie.mYNds 4,077.0N ssdr of Now York • Demand Y« U.S. TRmduryNob 4,662,474 a" of Nw Ywk • Dwmwrd n lk sl Now Ywk • Drmard Yss YN U.S. TnwYNM U.S. TMmasy Now 5.000 212 3.690,OB3 a" of Nw York - Donrd Yr U.S. Tn.wmYNaY 6,014A44 a" OfNw t/ak - Dermm d Y« U.S. Tr.sersy N.1. 4.N2.406 swdr of Now Yak • Dsmsod Yn U.S. Twwsmy Nen 3,ON.4Y U.S. Dswwamd O.a.N.. GMIIM SWAN Amwsnd lank so Nw Yak • Oorrrad Yes FAftd CREDIT 6.076.707 lark of Nw Yak • O.nad Yes FARM CREDIT Oileewd 2.407.ON ark Bof Nw Ywk • Danwd Yso FNUI 2.021,734 sad.f Nw Yak • Owrwd o" fNw York -Ow.sad Yse Y« FNLB FNUB 2.030.228 2.372.663 dy Boof No"Yse ank-Dsnd Yse Fitts 1.019.342 Bonk of Nw Yak-De.usd Yss FNMA4DW-uM 4.NT,493 T 27.511.8511 Ack 2 r4.162.474 4 ]4.052.474 2 3 14♦662.406 63.6N.440 9 Surplus Swan NFunds suran M. Ad I No { 711,N N 334 s (O.027) S 111,307 1,01,000 { 712,334 027 s 112,307 6AN7X O.s26t% Iwo � rli;a�ffii;m im i7l I I I P� Pudob-MY0rw.6eaw Anwdoad 2002RDA U.S .Berrk-W Yr U.s.Tn.w.yst 27.770.720 2003 Ts." RDA U.S. Sark •CIP Yos U.S.Tnswmy BB 6.979.810 2004 Finance Au•wsy-CIP Ye. U.S.Tnmwmy" 9.143,864 Tom. . TmouryN • 1 Pa•.b • K%" Funds Trumbe 1dw"mww Back VIAND Chia Ca U.S2ert-Pwjwi YES imt Ar.erfrar CMa Conw U.s.swrk-Mid Bur YES Id Aarkwr 6 164 RDA U.B. BN*4).bi Sus IM RDA U.S.Sank-CP YES YES Id Aawim. id American 23 1966 RDA U.S.Sark • Spsdd Fud YES 1d Mwmcan 22 20od Fir A6* • 1S06 US Serdr • Ennw YES ter Asarfnn 101 toNRDAU.S.BN-CIP I•NRDAU."wd•DMSw YES YES IMAauston folAmrariso. is tONMAU.S.Swd-Bpadll Fund YES 1dAmndm 6 lo"MAU.s.terrk-CP YES IMA.ataw 2001 RDA U.S. Bwd • OM Sw 2N/ RDA U.S. Sank • CP YES YES 1d Mrerleon 1d Amndaan N 2002 MAU.s.sus-OMSw YES I AAkm >• 20021"U.S .Bsnk•CP YES 161Aaera.m i t.4N.a22 2003 Tomobb MA U.S. Bwd• DS YES /d A.wtaerr To 20013 Tan6N MA U. S. sa .W 2009 Ton01. MA U. S. Swd,4w YES YES 1d Anerbw 1er Amw6wr 1,510,836 2004 Fir Auds US Sank • CP YEs Is,Aswkerr 3,0N.ON 20o4FwAu&US§wA ca rEs I.Aawirar 85.000 c swan suaus 5.075.797 5.076,7.7 2.407.e109 2.407.960 2.021.734 2,021.734 2.030.028 2.3n.663 2,030.024 2.072.563 1.019.342 1.019.342 4,607,483 4.917.483 27.511.151 7 11 1 swo m Srmpkr. 27776,720 6:079.610 61606,664 27.77• 729 6,67•,610 9.966.664 80303031 • 1 surplus Yes Adi Surplus Yes 6 23 22 101 • 23 22 101 Is 6 IS s N 36 N 36 1,466,332 1,406,332 70 70 • I,S10,9310 1.510,930 3.046,N6 3,040Z N,006 66.aN GAIIA&Z GAIIA021 TOW Fb.W pn bwsbrrr 0WA4AI3 i SOA74AI31 GM"TsW I INAMMAU I I au'pkn Supin AI Funds swan 47,0670% 47. &.pW Surpin As Funds Suau 1 Nl4601L H.t43NK VIEW I I 1N,0666x I1N.NNx - City of La Quinta Historical Information June 30, 2004 Annualized Earnings of Pooled Cash Investments Annualized Earnings of Fiscal Agent Investments Annualized Earnings of All Investments Six Month Treasury Hill Rate Average Maturity (days) LAW mate Annualized Eamings of Pooled Cash Investments Annualized Earnings of Fiscal Agent Investments Annualized Earnings of All Investments Six Month Treasury Bill mate Average Maturity (days) LAIF Rate Annualized Earnings of Pooled Cash Investments Annualized Earnings of Fiscal Agent Investments Annualized Earnings of All Investments Six Month Treasury Bill Rate Average Maturity (days) LAIF Rate Annualized Earnings of Pooled Cash Investments Annualized Earnings of Fiscal Agent Investments Annualized Earnings of All Investments Six Month Treasury Bill Rate Average Maturity (days) LAW Rate July 03 August Set Oct Nov Dec Jan 04 Feb March April May June 1.66% 1.65% 1.65% 1.59% 1.640/6 1.67% 1.580% 1.65% 1.50% 1.50% 1.54% 1.69% 0.52% 0.45% 0.49% 0.48% 0.48% 0.57% 0.30% 0.30% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.47% 1.43% 1.35% 1.26% 1.36% 1.38% 1.41 % 1.37% 1.38% 1.33% 1.330/9 1.36% 1.62% 0.98% 1.06% 1.01 % 1.04% 1.03% 0.990/0 1.00% 1.01 % 1.01 % 1.190/0 1.38% 1.73% 131 110 80 121 98 117 140 120 155 137 137 234 1.650% 1 1.632% 1.640% 1.596% 1.572% 1.545% 1.5280/6 1.440% 1.474% 1.445%1 1.426% 1.426% July 02 August Set Oct Nov Dec Jan 03 Feb March April May June 2.46% 2.45% 2.46% 2.41 % 2.32% 2.23% 2.11 % 1.99% 2.01 % 1.98% 1.86% 1.73% 1.000/0 1.270/6 1.26% 1.00% 1.000/0 1.00% 0.80% 0.59% 0.75% 0.72% 0.73% 0.49% 2.05% 2.07% 2.10% 2.08% 2.02% 1.80% 1.62% 1.740/6 1.78% 1.76% 1.540/6 1.40% 1.73% 1.640/6 1.62% 1.55% 1.29% 1.27% 1.16% 1.20% 1.18% 1.170/6 1.100/6 0.86% 172 234 139 121 109 163 137 131 117 92 74 123 2.71 % 2.59% 2.60% 2.49% 2.30% 2.31 % 2.10% 1.95% 1.98% 1.86% 1.800/6 1 1.70% July 01 A99ust Set Oct Nov Dec Jan 02 Feb March April May June 4.790/6 4.90% 4.63% 4.04% 3.05% 2.83% 2.37% 2.26% 2.250/6 2.35% 2.59% 2.42% 3.40% 3.20% 3.20% 2.20% 1.70% 1.40% 1.60% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.00% 1.00% 4.58% 3.91 % 3.98% 3.57% 2.49% 2.34% 1.97% 1.95% 1.99% 2.05% 1.780/6 1.93% 3.490/6 3.390/6 3.39% 2.01 % 1.990/0 1.85% 1.83% 1.850/6 2.16% 1.92% 1.89% 1.77% 48 51 43 27 62 44 27 53 35 79 122 132 4.64% 4.50% 4.29% 3.79% 3.53% 3.26% 3.07% 2.97% 1 2.86% 1 2.85% 1 2.85% 1 2.690/6 July 00 August Set Oct Nov Dec Jan 01 Feb March April May June 6.370/6 6.43% 6.34% 6.45% 6.46% 6.46% 6.36% 6.31 % 5.89% 5.86% 5.20% 4.98% 6.17% 6.11 % 6.230/6 6.20% 6.20% 5.97% 5.03% 5.06% 4.82% 4.10% 3.60% 3.50% 6.31 % 6.35% 6.31 % 6.39% 6.40% 6.38% 6.040/6 6.08% 5.75% 5.53% 4.96% 4.70% 6.28% 6.38% 6.26% 6.33% 6.32% 5.74% 5.03% 4.66% 4.27% 3.79% 3.55% 3.34% 220 232 231 202 181 158 124 110 101 80 76 65 6.44% 6.51% 6.50% 6.52% 6.540/6 6.35% 6.37% 6.17% 5.98% 5.76% 5.33% 1 4.96% City of La Quinta Chart of Interest Rates FY 03/04 to Date 1.85% 0-4 1.65% ■ 1.45% 1.25% c §.05% 1*100 m a 0.85% 0.65% 0.45% 0.25% July 03 August Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan 04 Feb March April May June Months Annualized Eamings of Pooled Cash Investments —*—Annualized Earnings of Fiscal Agent Investments ■ Annualized Eamings of All Investments —*—Six Month Treasury Bill Rate --� LAI F Rate CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY FIXED CITY LONGTERM RDA FIXED RDA LONGTERM FINANCING FA LONG TERM GRAND BALANCE SHEET 06138/04 CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL ASSETS: POOLED CASH (22.738.034.31) 0.00 0.00 43,581,831.38 0.00 0.00 5,005.88 0.00 20,848,802.95 LORP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 612,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 612,000.00 160.370,000.00 INVESTMENT T-BILLNOTES S OTHER 70,370.000.00 0.00 0.00 90,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AUTO MALL CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54,278.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54,278.79 LORD CASH BOND REDEMPTION CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 320.43 0.00 0.00 5.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 326.26 0.00 BOND RESERVE CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.055,857.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,000.00 0.00 6,110,89.02 BOND PROJECT CASH BOND ESCROW CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 PETTY CASH CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 1,000.00 47.632.965.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,304287.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,011.71 0.00 187,997,265.02 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 706,363.55 0.00 0.00 60,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 767,263.55 (604,298.76) PREMIUMIKHSCOUNT ON INVESTMENT 32.069.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (636,368.65) 80,212.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0,212.59 LORP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 0.00 252,314.95 0.00 0.00 186,134.57 0.00 0.00 40.73 0.00 418,490.25 INTEREST RECEIVABLE LOAN/NOTES RECEIVABLE 9,841.11 0.00 0.00 12,741.527.47 0.00 0.00 90,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 102.751,368.58 5,248,016.40 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES 5,248,016.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 879,096.69 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES-CVAG 879,096.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (879,096.69) CVAG ALLOWANCE DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS (879.090.69) 728.283.26 0.00 0.00 530,819.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1259,103.07 DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 2,783,283.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,783,283.18 21,397,550.21 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS - PRINCIPAL ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS - INTEREST 21.397,550.21 7,273,533.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,336,157.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,609,691.50 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,778.66 NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 2,778.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ACCRUED REVENUE FIXED ASSETS 0.00 306,249,652.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 306A49,652.80 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 929,209.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 929,209.62 400.00 TRAVEL ADVANCES 400.00 13,015.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,015.70 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES 296,748.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 298,748.24 454.202,485.29 RECEIVABLE TOTAL 39,673.408.19 306,249,652.60 0.00 18,279,383.77 0.00 0.00 90,000,040.73 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT 0.00 240,955.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240.955.00 4,830.00 RENT DEPOSITS 4,830.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 00 UTILITY DEPOSITS MISC. DEPOSITS 1073.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00_ 0.00 0.00 1,07321 DEPOSITS TOTAL 246,858.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 246,858.21 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,066,306.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.066,306.00 0.00 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE LIT DEBT AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR LIT DEBT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,970,552.85 0.00 0.00 247,549,965.00 0.00 94,814,343.00 344,334,880.85 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 0.00 0.00 1,970,562.85 0.00 52 006 306.00 247,549,965.00 0.00 94,814,343.00 306,401,166.85 TOTAL ASSETS 87 553,232 09 306.249 652 80 1 970 552.85 158.583.871.39 52,066,306.00 247,549,965.00 90,080.052.44 94,814,343.00 1,038.847,775.37 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 5,317,378.91 0.00 0.00 72,676.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,390,055.71 58,909.86 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 56,909.86 36,652.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,746,630.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,783,283.18 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS ADVANCES FROM OTHER FUNDS - PRINCIPAL 5,338,157.98 0.00 0.00 21,397,550.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,733,708.19 7,273.533.52 ADVANCES FROM OTHER FUNDS - INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,273,533.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INTEREST PAYABLE 0.00 726.296.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 726,298.63 RETENTION PAYABLE PAYROLL LIABILITIES 379,383.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 379,383.19 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS (18.52) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (18.52) 108,428.00 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 105,428.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUSPENSE DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,449,581.76 PAYABLES TOTAL 11,959,190.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,490,391.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,664.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,864.00 LORP DEPOSITS DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 0.00 1,516,591.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,835.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,519,426.07 MISC. DEPOSITS 562,147.27 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 587,147.27 1,989,102.27 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS TOTAL DEPOSITS 1 989102 27 4,007,840.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,499.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,114.339.61 DEFERRED REVENUE 3,767,177.88 0.00 0.00 10 618101 84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90 000,000.00 90,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 104,385,279.72 104.385.279.72 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 3,767.177.88 0.00 0.00 10,618,101.84 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 0.00 0.00 631,553.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 531,553.26 1,010,688.59 DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,010,688.59 428,311.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 428,311.00 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.050,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,050,000.00 DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.667,336.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,867,336.00 0.00 DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.000,000.00 LOANS PAYABLE BONDS PAYABLE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 148,832,629.00 0.00 94,814,343.00 243,60,972.00 TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 0.00 0.00 1,970.552.85 0.00 0.00 247,549,955.00 0.00 94,814,343.00 344.334,800.85 TOTAL LIABILITIES 19,794,209.18 0.00 1,970,552.85 42,154,991.91 0.00 247,549,965.00 90,000,000.00 94,814,343.00 498,284,081.94 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE 67,759,022.91 306,249,652.60 0.00 116,428,679.48 52,066,306.00 0.00 60,052.44 0.00 542.563,713.43 TOTAL LIABILITY & EQUITY 871553,232.09 306.249 652 60 1970 552.85 158,583,671.39 52 086,306.00 247,549,965.00 90.080,062.44 94,814,343.00 1,038.847,775.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CASH 3 INVESTMENT TOTAL 187,997.265.02 PREMRIMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (604,298.76) TOTAL 187,392,966.26 [, 2 12 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Report for June 30, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for June 30, 2004 for the City of La Quinta. 4especully submit ed, 4AI c)hn M. Falcone , Finance Director Krod for submis ion by• Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures for June 30, 2004 63 ATTACHMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2003 W30104 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED General $19,601,257.00 $25,998,027.41 132.60% Library 688,400.00 704,324.89 102.30% Gas Tax Revenue 553,700.00 612,259.75 110.60% Cmaq/lstea 595,235.00 41,450.06 7.00% Federal Assistance 339,427.00 30,000.00 8.80% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 8,012.58 0.00% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 100,700.00 100,121.64 99.40% Local Law Enforcement 19,918.00 19,740.61 99.10% Lighting & Landscaping 854,600.00 816,045.35 95.50% Quimby 28,900.00 352,585.17 1220.00% Crime Violent Task Force 0.00 0.00 0.00% Infrastructure 15,600.00 31,458.44 201.70% Village Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00% South Coast Air Quality 240,204.00 37,520.00 15.60% LQ Public Safety Officer 2,300.00 2,159.20 93.90% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00% Capital Improvement 106,196,829.00 43,207,098.38 40.70% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 0.00 0.00% Urban Forestry 0.00 0.00 0.00% Equipment Replacement 376,477.00 365,881.01 97.20% Information Technology 388,682.00 387,548.33 99.70% Arts In Public Places 102,600.00 300,632.26 293.00% Transportation 602,300.00 2,449,088.96 406.60% Parks & Recreation 251,000.00 859,234.26 342.30% Civic Center 204,200.00 573,884.40 281.00% Library Development 112,500.00 373,668.35 332.10% Community Center 57,200.00 163,923.27 286.60% Street Facility 9,400.00 34,263.47 364.50% Park Facility 3,000.00 9,787.77 326.30% Fire Protection Facility 33,100.00 157,942.74 477.20% Library Development (County) Facilit, 204,100.00 205,879.06 100.90% La Quinta Financing Authority 90,690,330.00 90,690,557.86 100.00% RDA Project Area No. 1 90,027,256.00 91,276,141.54 101.40% RDA Project Area No. 2 142,001,806.00 93,357,805.10 65.70% Total 1 $454 301 021.00 1 $353167 041.86 1 77.70% Clnr of LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 07/01IM3 - 6130104 REMAINING FUNDS BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET PERCENT General $22,680,325.00 $19,403,030.84 $84,560.01 $3,192,734.15 85.6% Library 409,137.00 0.00 0.00 409,137.00 0.0% Gas Tax 758,906.00 577,425.37 0.00 181,480.63 76.1% Cmaq/lstea 595,235.00 41,450.06 0.00 553,784.94 7.0% Federal Assistance 331,932.00 32,752.50 0.00 299,179.50 9.91Y0 Proposed Assessment District 142,507.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142,507.00 (48.12) 0.0% 100.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue Local Law Enforcement 107,926.00 25,778.00 107,974.12 45,315.15 0.00 (19,537.15) 175.8% Lighting & Landscaping 854,600.00 816,045.35 0.00 38,654.65 95.5% Quimby 301,583.00 146,321.14 0.00 155,261.86 48.5% Violent Crime Task Force 528.00 528.05 0.00 (0.05) 100.0% Infrastructure 2,264,620.00 1,120,840.45 0.00 1,143,779.55 49.5% Village Parking (1,893.00) 0.00 0.00 (1,893.00) 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 231,231.00 17,386.10 0.00 213,844.90 7.5% Lq Pubic Safety Officer 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Interest Allocation Capital Improvement 0.00 106,196,827.00 43,207,098.38 4,000.00 62,985,728.62 40.7% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.0% 0.0% Urban Forestry Equipment Replacement 1,100.00 380,641.00 227,929.62 26,106.33 126,605.05 59.9% Information Technology 694,781.00 792,862.00 381,661.94 143,986.67 0.00 0.00 313,119.06 648,875.33 54.9% 18.2% Arts In Pubic Places Transportation 2,712,674.00 85,469.68 0.00 2,627,204.32 3.2% Parks S Recreation 618,564.00 507,226.85 0.00 111,337.15 82.0% Civic Center 686,095.00 467,310.68 0.00 218,784.42 68.1 % Library Development 4,074,930.00 328.479.83 0.00 3,746,450.17 8.1% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Street Facility Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Fire Protection 1,500,000.00 1,510,185.60 0.00 (10,185.60) 100.7% Library County DIF 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 0.0% La Quinta Financing Authority 90,558,724.00 90,631,034.00 0.00 (72,310.00) 100.1% RDA Project Area No. 1 121,052,842.00 77,782,117.83 0.00 43,270,724.17 64.30k RDA Project Area No. 2 92,094,896.00 40,851,969.31 0.00 51,242,926.69 44.4% Toth ,46 1.00 $278,433,539.42 $114,666.34171,9 1,1 4 61.8% CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2003 - 6130104 GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED TAXES: Property Tax 573,300.00 702,097.79 (128,797.79) 122.470% No Low Property Tax Distribution 808,100.00 1,496,043.11 (687,943.11) 185.130% Sales Tax 4,200,000.00 5,240,036.87 (1,040,036.87) 124.760% Document Transfer Tax 487,300.00 867,057.84 (379,757.84) 177.930% Transient Occupancy Tax 4,055,300.00 4,261,766.72 (206,466.72) 105.090% Franchise Tax 597,600 00 895,810.37 (298,210.37) 149.900% TOTAL TAXES 10,721,600.00 13,462,812.70 (2,741,212.70) 125.570% LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Mechanical Permits Electrical Permits Garage Sale Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 180,700.00 191,061.80 (10,361.80) 105.730% 17,500.00 15,192.85 2,307.15 86.820% 412,500.00 1,987,311.35 (1,574,811.35) 481.770% 90,800.00 305,623.33 (214,823.33) 336.590% 37,500.00 182,111.37 (144,611.37) 485.630% 69,000.00 299,622.48 (230,622.48) 434.240% 5,000.00 17,240.00 (12,240.00) 344.800% 49,500 00 97,981.65 (48,481.65) 197.940% 862,500.00 3,096,144.83 (2,233,644.83) 358.970% FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications 4,950.00 21,733.70 (16,783.70) 439.060% Community Services Fees 190,998.00 252,677.35 (61,679.35) 132.290% Bldg & Safety Fees 396,300.00 1,052,080.34 (655,780.34) 265.480% Community Development Fees 222,400.00 295,138.79 (72,738.79) 132.710% Public Works Fees 584,375 00 997,947.91 (413,572.91) 170.770% TOTAL FEES 1,399,023.00 2,619,578.09 (1,220,555.09) 187.240% INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu 1,189,185.00 1,484,569.30 (295,384.30) 124.840% Motor Vehicle Code Fines 70,700.00 123,581.72 (52,881.72) 174.800% Parking Violations 54,400.00 44,270.00 10,130.00 81.380% Misc. Fines 15,000.00 18,221.43 (3,221.43) 121.480% AB939 145,000.00 68,719.27 76,280.73 47.390% County of Riverside Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% State of California Grant 0.00 51,771.18 (51,771.18) 0.000% Fire servicesCredit 2,295,878.00 2,249,448.17 46,429.83 97.980% CSA152 Assessment 150,000 00 175,046.04 (25,046.04) 116.700% TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 3,920,163.00 4,215,627.11 (295,464.11) 107.540% INTEREST 2,391,982.00 2,311,187.79 80,794.21 96.620% MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue 3,000.00 109,313.33 (106,313.33) 3643.780% Litigation settlement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Cash Over/(Short) 0.00 74.29 (74.29) 0.000% TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 109,387.62 (106,387.62) 3646.250% TRANSFER IN 302,989.00 183,289.27 119,699.73 60.490% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 19,601,257.00 25,998,027.41 (6,396,770.41) 132.630% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Contributions Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: CMAQIISTEA Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest Assessment Bond Proceeds Prepayments -sewer assessments Transfer in TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 662,500.00 627,358.40 35,141.60 94.700% 0.00 53,000.00 (53,000.00) 0.000% 25,900.00 23,966.49 1,933.51 92.530% 688,400.00 704,324.89 (15,924.89) 102.310% 168,200.00 190,038.08 (21,838.08) 112.980% 115,900.00 135,053.25 (19,153.25) 116.530°% 216,700.00 253,391.03 (36,691.03) 116.930% 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 100.000% 39,300.00 20,661.68 18,638.32 52.570% 7,600.00 7,115.71 484.29 93.630% 553,700.00 612,259.75 (58,559.75) 110.580% 595,235.00 41,450.06 553,784.94 -6.960% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 595,235.00 41,450.06 553,784.94 6.960% 339,427.00 30,000.00 309,427.00 8.840% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 339,427.00 30,000.00 309,427.00 8.840% 0.00 8,012.58 (8,012.58) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 8,012.58 (8,012.58) 0.000% SLESF (COPS) REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 100.000% Interest 700.00 121.64 578.36 17.380% TOTAL SLESF (COPS) 100,700.00 100,121.64 578.36 99.430% LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding 19,218.00 19,218.00 0.00 100.000% Interest 700.00 522.61 177.39 74.660% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LLEBG 19,918.00 19,740.61 177.39 99.110% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment 854,600.00 816,045.35 38,554.65 95.490% Developer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPIN, 854,600.00 816,045.35 38,554.65 95.490% QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees 25,000.00 344,198.32 (319,198.32) 1376.790% Interest 3,900.00 8,386.85 (4,486.85) 215.050% TOTAL QUIMBY 28,900.00 35 ,5 .17 323,6 5.17 220.020 ° CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE REVENUE: Member Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Grant revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Asset Forfeiture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FOI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest Transfer in TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution MSRC Funding Street Sweeping Grant Interest TOTAL SCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 0.00 0.00 0.000% 15,600.00 31,458.44 (15,858.44) 201.660% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 15,600.00 31,458.44 (15,858.44) 201.660% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 21,800.00 35,447.87 (13,647.87) 162.600% 77,119.00 77,119.00 0.000% 139,285.00 139,285.00 0.000% 2,000.00 2,072.13 (72.13) 103.610% 240,204.00 37,520.00 202,684.00 15.620% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.000% 300.00 159.20 140.80 53.070% 2,300.00 2,159.20 140.80 93.880% INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG CVWD County of Riverside Surface Transportation Funding City of Indio SB300 Funding RCTC S6821-Bicycle Path Grant State of California APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Litigation Settlements Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment Bond Proceeds Interest TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY 12,527,993.00 5,823,287.71 6,704,705.29 46.480% 927,462.00 50,000.00 877,462.00 5.390% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 244,800.00 0.00 244,800.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.000% 108,240.00 0.00 108,240.00 0.000% 440,581.00 58,095.00 382,486.00 13.190% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.000% 153,000.00 153,000.00 0.00 100.000% 91,692,753.00 37,122,715.67 54,570,037.33_ 40.490% 106,196,829.00 43,207,098.38 62,989,730.62 40.690% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 68 AE CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % (continued) BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges 317,677.00 317,678.00 0.00) 100.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Sale of Fixed Asset 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 58,800.00 48,203.01 10,596.99 81.980% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMEI 376,477.00 365,881.01 10,595.99 97.190% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services 377,282.00 377,282.00 0.00 100.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Sale of Fixed Asset 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 11,400.00 10,266.33 1,133.67 90.060% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLC 388,682.00 387,548.33 1,133.67 99.710% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places 97,500.00 287,054.58 (189,554.58) 294.410% Arts in Public Places Credits Applied 0.00 4,122.64 (4,122.64) 0.000% Interest 5,100.00 9,455.04 (4,355.04) 185.390% TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 102,600.00 300,632.26 (198,032.26) 293.010% TRANSPORTATION Developer fees 549,000.00 2,358,474.11 (1,809,474.11) 429.590% Interest 53,300.00 90,614.85 (37,314.85) 170.010% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 602,300.00 2,449,088.96 (1,846,788.96) 406.620% PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees 251,000.00 837,411.45 (586,411.45) 333.630% Interest 0.00 21,822.81 (21,822.81) 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 251,000.00 859,234.26 (608,234.26) 342.320% CIVIC CENTER Developer fees 183,000.00 539,955.43 (356,955.43) 295.060% Interest 21,200.00 33,928.97 (12,728.97) 160.040% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 204,200.00 573,884.40 (369,684.40) 281.040% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING 96 (continued) BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees 112,500.00 356,491.16 (243,991.16) 316.880% Interest 0.00 17,177.19 (17,177.19) 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 112,500.00 373,668.35 (261,168.35) 332.150% COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees 48,500.00 153,585.00 (105,085.00) 316.670% Interest 8,700 00 10,338.27 (1,638.27) 118.830% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 57,200.00 163,923.27 (106,723.271 286.580% STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY 7,500.00 31,827.63 (24,327.63) 424.370% 1,900 00 2,435.84 (535.84) 128.200% 9,400.00 34,263.47 (24,863.47) 364.510% 2,500.00 9,150.99 (6,650.99) 366.040% 500.00 636.78 (136.78) 127.360% 3,000.00 9,787.77 (6,787.77) 326.260% FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY Developer fees 32,100.00 157,345.32 (125,245.32) 490.170% Interest 1,000.00 597.42 402.58 59.740% TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FACILr 33,100.00 157,942.74 (124,842.74) 477.170% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT (COUNTY) FACILITY Developer fees 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 100.000% Interest 4,100 00 5,879.06 (1,779.06) 143.390% TOTAL LIBRARY DEV (COUNTY) 1 204,100.00 205,879.06 (1,779.06) 100.870% 0710112003 - 6/30/04 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REMAINING BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 919,600.00 640,437.61 0.00 279,162.39 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 775,169.00 739,817.33 0.00 35,351.67 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 821,350.00 720,748.14 0.00 100,601.86 PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 758,502.00 711,135.29 400.00 46,966.71 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 3,274,621.00 2,812,138.37 400.00 462,082.63 CITY CLERK 476,363.00 448,159.15 0.00 28,203.85 TOTAL CITY CLERK 476,363.00 448,159.15 0.00 28,203.85 COMMUNITY SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 776,646.00 588,905.63 29,747.12 157.993.25 SENIOR CENTER 347,635.00 312,606.36 0.00 35,028.64 PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 100,048.00 135,284.87 9,247.22 (44,484.09) TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,224,329.00 1,036,796.86 38,994.34 148,537.80 FINANCE FISCAL SERVICES 693,924.00 625,186.99 0.00 68,737.01 CENTRAL SERVICES 748,086.00 613,911.82 30,546.73 103,627.45 TOTAL FINANCE 1,442,010.00 1,239,098.81 30,546.73 172,364.46 BUILDING 3 SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 231,925.00 226,116.13 0.00 5,808.87 BUILDING 898,739.00 1,162,423.13 0.00 (263,684.13) CODE COMPLIANCE 655,449.00 520,713.47 0.00 134,735.53 ANIMAL CONTROL 229,922.00 188,717.78 0.00 41,204.22 CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,068,765.00 1,085,485.63 0.00 (16,720.63) TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 3,084,800.00 3,183,456.14 0.00 (98,656.14) PUBLIC SAFETY: POLICE SERVICES 5,293,749.00 5,285;175.12 0.00 8,573.88 FIRE 2,342,380.00 1,831,358.28 0.00 511,021.72 EMERGENCY SERVICES 48,945.00 26,316.18 0.00 22,628.82 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 7,685,074.00 7,142,849.58 0.00 642,224.42 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 822,152.00 462,317.87 0.00 359,834.13 CURRENT PLANNING 711,429.00 519,930.05 0.00 191,498.95 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,533,581.00 982,247.92 0.00 551,333.08 PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 257,520.00 163,969.30 0.00 93,550.70 DEVELOPMENT 5 TRAFFIC 1,240,125.00 1,154,814.44 0.00 85,310.56 MAINT/OPERATIONS - STREETS 2,256,952.00 1,055,349.50 8,000.00 1,193,602.50 MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 2,001,742.00 1,714,878.78 3,474.94 283,388.28 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 699,980.00 735,933.71 3,144.00 (39,097.71) TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 6,456,319.00 4,824,945.73 14,618.94 1,516,754.33 TRANSFERS OUT 1,327,716.00 959,001.58 0.00 368,714.42 GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,824,488.00) (3,225,663.30) 0.00 (598,824.70) NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 22,680,325.00 19,403,030.84 84,560.01 3,192,734.15 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/0112003 - W30104 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET LIBRARY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 409,137.00 0.00 0.00 409,137.00 TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 409,137.00 0.00 0.00 409,137.00 GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 653,700.00 563,700.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 205,206.00 23,725.37 0.00 181,480.63 TOTAL GAS TAX FUND 7 577,425.37 0.00 181,480.63 QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT TOTAL QUIMBY FUND 301,583.00 146,321.14 0.00 155,261.86 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 331,932.00 32,752.50 0.00 299,179.50 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 14,827.00 17,386.10 0.00 (2,559.10) TRANSFER OUT 216,404.00 0.00 0.00 216,404.00 TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 1, .00 17,386.10 1 , CMAQASTEA TRANSFER OUT TOTAL CMAQASTEA FUND 595,235.00 41,450.06 0.00 553,784.94 VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING FUND (1,893.00) 0.00 0.00 (1,893.00) LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS TOTAL LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT TOTAL LLEBG FUND 25,778.00 45,315.15 0.00 (19,537.15) VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE 528.00 528.05 0.00 (0.05) PROJECT EXPENDITURES TOTAL VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE 528.00 628.06 (0.05) SLESF (COPS) . TRANSFER OUT TOTAL SLESF (COPS) FUND 107,926.00 107,974.12 0.00 (48.12) LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 854,600.00 816,045.35 0.00 38,554.65 TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 864,600.00 81 INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 2,264,620.00 1,120,840.45 0.00 11143,779.55 TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE .00 1,120, .45 0.00 1143779.55 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 142,507.00 0.00 0.00 142,507.00 TOTAL AD 2000-1 142,507.00 0.00 0.00 142,507.00 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2003 - 6130104 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 63,050.00 63,050.06 0.00 (0.06) CONTRIBUTION 392,878.00 0.00 0.00 392,878.00 TRANSFER OUT 2,256,746.00 22,419.62 0.00 2,234,326.38 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 1 4.00 85,469.68 0.00 2,627,204.32 PARKS 3 RECREATION INTEREST ON ADVANCE 0.00 103,476.55 0.00 (103,476.65) TRANSFER OUT 618,564.00 403,750.30 0.00 214,813.70 TOTAL PARKS 3 RECREATION 618,564.00 507,226.85 0.00 111,337.16 CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 2,905.80 0.00 (2,905.80) REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 204,251.00 204,251.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 481,844.00 260153.78 0.00 221,690.22 TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 00 4671310.53,1 LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROGRAM COSTS TRANSFER OUT 4,074,930.00 328,479.83 0.00 3,746,450.17 TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 4, 4,9 3 .00 3,746,450.17 COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROGRAM COSTS TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 FIRE PROTECTION INTEREST ON ADVANCE 0.00 10,186.60 0.00 (10,185.60) TRANSFER OUT 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION DIF 1, 1,610,185.60 0.00 (10,1 LIBRARY COUNTY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 TOTAL LIBRARY COUNTY DIF 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.UO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 105,399,190.00 42,969,727.43 4,000.00 62,426,462.57 PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 797,637.00 237,370.95 0.00 560,266.05 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 106,1 ,827.00_ 43,207,095.38 4, 62,985,728.62 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 3,500.00 0.00 0.00 3,500.00 OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 1,800.00 ART PURCHASES 502,409.00 124,821.00 0.00 377,588.00 TRANSFER OUT 285,153.00 19,165.67 0.00 265,987.33 TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 792,862.00 143,986.67 75. LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY GRANT 1,100.00 0.00 0.00 1,100.00 CITY OF LA QUINTA REMAINING OTHER CITY FUNDS EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,893.00) 0.00 0.00 (1,893.00) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 694,781.00 381,661.94 0.00 313,119.06 TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND 6 381,661.94 0.00 31 ,11 . 06 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 380,641.00 227,929.62 26 106.33 126,605.05 TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 380,641.00 227,929.62 20,105.33 125,605. 5 Iry 4 aCPQK&rrA COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Recreation Supervisor to Attend the Certified Playground Safety Inspector Course in La Palma, California, September 22-24, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Recreation Supervisor to attend the Certified Playground Safety Inspector Course in La Palma, California, September 22-24, 2004. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The costs associated with Certified Playground Safety Instructor Course will be funded through the Community Services Administration Travel, Training and Meetings Account # 101-3001-451-51-01. The estimated expenditures are as follows: • Registration $ 365 • Meals $ 100 • Lodging $ 300 • Travel $ 100 TOTAL: $ 865 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The California Joint Powers Authority Playground Safety Inspector Certification Course and Exam is the only national program devoted to playground safety inspectors. Obtaining this certification will meet the State of California requirements regarding the inspection of playgrounds. The course is 12 hours of training from nationally known playground experts who prepare course participants for the two-hour, 100-question exam held at the culmination of the certification course as provided in Attachment 1. Participants that pass the exam are certified for three years. By obtaining this certification, the Works Maintenance Foreman recommendations for appropriate maintenance guidelines. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Recreation Supervisor can assist the Public with playground inspections and make maintenance to comply with established The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Recreation Supervisor to attend the Certified Playground Safety Inspector Course in La Palma, California, September 22-24, 2004; or 2. Do not approve the authorization for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully isubmitted, i'L1I DRUOIN Attachment: mmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1. Playground Safety Inspector Course Flyer S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\C 1 CPSI Overnight 8-17-04.doc ATTACHMENT 1 n IQ 01 GO ro *T4 ■ "' eD too Z W > Z f-t- Z f� QA 0 31 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the STUDY SESSION: Public Works Maintenance Foreman to Attend the Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course in PUBLIC HEARING: La Palma, California, from September 22 - 24, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: Approve authorization for pvernight travel for the Public Works Maintenance Foreman to attend the Certified hayground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course in La Palma, California, from September 22 - 24, 2004. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Fiscal Year 2004/2005 Budget has allocated funds for travel, training and meetings for staff in Account Nos. (101-7004-431.51-01 and 101-7005-431.51-01). Attendance at this conference is estimated to be $765.00 based on the following costs: Registration $365.00 Hotel (2 nights) $200.00 Meals $100.00 Travel $100.00 Total $765.00 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. W BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Playground Safety Inspector Course and Certification Examination, is offered by the National Playground Safety Institution (NPSI), a program of the National Recreation and Park Association. The purpose of the NPSI Playground Safety Inspector Course is to enable the CPSI to be capable of establishing the basics of a sound risk reduction program, audit a playground, establish a system of repair, retrofit and remove hazardous equipment and establish a routine inspection system for their own agency. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Maintenance Foreman to attend the Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course in La Palma, California, from September 22 - 24, 2004; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Maintenance Foreman to attend the Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) Course in La Palma, California, from September 22 - 24, 2004; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, mothy Rjinas o , P. E. ublic Wo irks sDirector/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 2 7 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Improvements Associated with Specific Plan 96-027, Parcel Map No. 28573, and Conditional Use Permit 96-028, The Home Depot, Credit Suisse Leasing 92A, L.P. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept improvements to Specific Plan 96-027, Parcel Map No. 28573, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 96-028, The Home Depot, Credit Suisse Leasing 92A, L.P., and authorize staff to release performance securities upon receipt of warranty securities. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. Since no public improvements were included with Specific Plan 96-027, Parcel Map No. 28573, or CUP 96-028, no additional maintenance costs are anticipated. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Specific Plan 96-027, Parcel Map No. 28573, and CUP 96-028, are located north of Highway 111, south of the Coachella Valley Storm Channel, west of Jefferson Street, and east of Depot Drive (Attachment 1). All improvements are now complete and all obligation$ of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and the Development Lease Agreement have been satisfied. Attachment 2 is a Table of Values indicating securities to be released after the City receives the warranty securities. S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\8-17-04\C 3 28573.doc FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept improvements to Specific Plan 96-027, Parcel Map No. 28573, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 96-028, The Home Depot, Credit Suisse Leasing 92A, L.P., and authorize staff to release performance securities upon receipt of warranty securities; or 2. Do not accept improvements to Specific Plan 96-027, Parcel Map No. 28573, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 96-028, The Home Depot, Credit Suisse Leasing 92A, L.P., and do not authorize staff to release performance securities; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4imAothy R. Onass44, P.E. Public Wor Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Table of Values T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2004\08-17-04\28573.doc 2 8 .k ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT SITE 1 s 1 t � . 1 wow ro r � r _ � itttll Ogg N Q J n. z O w U. LL a, I �6 L. 8�. ATTACHMENT 2 SECURITY Specific Plan 96-027 Conditional Use Permit 96-028 Parcel Map No. 28573 The Home Depot Performance Securit Improvement Description Labor & Materials2 lCurrentAmount Proposed Reduction WARRANTY AMOUNT 3 Storm Channel Improvements $251,000 $251,000 90.00% $25,100 Domestic Water $24,300 $24,300 90.00% $2,430 Sanitary Sewer $22,100 $22,100 90.00% $2,210 Monumentation $0 $1,500 100.00% $0 Totals $297,400 $298,900 $29,740 ' Performance Security shall be released upon receipt of the Warranty Security by the City. 2 Labor & Materials Security shall remain in place for 90 days (November 15, 2004) after City Council acceptance of improvements. 3 WARRANTY SECURITY shall remain in place for one year (November 15, 2005) after City Council acceptance of improvements. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2004\08-17-04\28573 Att.doc 4 83 4 4epa�rw COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Public Works Director/City Engineer to Attend the APWA International Public Works Congress and Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia from September 12 - 151 2004 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Authorize overnight travel for the Public Works Director/City Engineer to attend the APWA International Public Works Congress and Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia from September 12 -15, 2004. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Fiscal Year 2004/2005 Budget has allocated funds for travel, training and meetings for staff. Attendance at this conference is estimated to be $1,500 based on the following costs: • Registration $ 545 • Hotel/Travel $806 • Meals $149 Total $1,500 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The APWA International Public Works Congress and Exposition allows Public Works professionals from across the country the opportunity to meet and discuss the latest social, economic, technological and political trends, as they relate to providing and maintaining public works for cities, counties, towns, and villages. The congress and exposition will be held September 12 - 15, 2004, in Atlanta, Georgia. If approved, the 811 S:\CitvMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\8-17-04\C 4 APWA.doc Public Works Director/City Engineer will attend this conference. The program preview is included as Attachment 1. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize overnight travel for the Public Works Director/City Engineer to attend the APWA International Public Works Congress and Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia from September 12 -15, 2004; or 2. Do not authorize overnight travel for the Public Works Director/City Engineer to attend the APWA International Public Works Congress and Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia from September 12 -15, 2004; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, ft t g mothy R. nass , P.E. Public WorJ Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Program Preview S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\8-17-04\C 4 APWA.doc 2 85 2004 APWA International Public Works Congress and Exposition Atlanta, Georgia •Georgia World Congress Center •September 12 - 15, 2004 Wes' Now, t8 Ma c orks? Fbd these answers agd more the t(�5t compreheasiYE god C , Mplet� GfNl �re�1Ce god trade show 10 public +works ;— The Best Shock. in ftbfic Works! Save $50 when you register by July 20th! We know you have a tough job! You're faced with monetary issues and budgetary constraints ... Your workload is getting heavier ... More focus is needed on preparing for emergency situations ... You have to plan and schedule projects from streets to sewer to flood control and wastewater ... You have to manage your employees, prioritize your time and their time, meet all deadlines ... And to top it off you have to answer to your boss, the city counsel, the media and the public! You have a LARGE task that keeps you focused on your community 2417! You're good — but if you don't keep up, you get left behind. That is what makes the Best Show in Public Works the right conference and exhibit for you! We work hard to understand your needs so that we can bring you the newest technologies, the best practices in public works, and the direct access to industry trendsetters that help you perform your job better. From construction to solid waste to water to right-of-way to streets and fleets, it's all here for you! Help your community thrive while becoming the .best public works professional you can be! join us in September and find out what is new, what is now, and what is next for public works. 4� Sunday .2:00 - 3:50 p.m. 9 Super Sessions • Gridlock Forever. Urban FromysYs. the Interstate Highway System • Managing Workplace Gossip 2:00 - 2:50,pan. e Education Sessions • Build Your Own Water/Scwer Financial Plan • Generational Workers = Higher Pe&rmance • linproyc Efficiency, Manage More Effectively with Technology • IdmGuidc- Best Practices for Municipal: •land Cover Changes to Improve Air Quality A Simple Strategy • NICET's Roads/Streets Maintenance Certification *Pavement Management Software: Finding the Best Fit • Petroleum vs. Synthetic Lubricants — The Great Debate -.Public Works: Partners in Capital Improvement Funding • Scheduling and Tucking Catch Basin Cleaning The Northeast Blackout of 2003 — Implications for public Works 3:00 - 4050 pen. e Super Session • Creating an Extraordinary Organization rentingLivable Communities through Traffic Management 3:00 - 3:50p.m. 9 EducationSenions • Core Competencies in Action Gamming the Yangtze River: The Three Gorges Project • Design -Contract -Build Delivery System 3:00 - 350 p.m. • Education k4Wons • Making TMD1,s Work for You (Not the Other Way Around) • Mold in Public Buildings: Is It More Serious Than You Think? • Real -Time Disaster Modeling Using HAZUS-MH • Roughometer for Unsealed Roads • Save Energy, Save Money — Retrofitting Residential Streedights • Scrap Tires: Trading Disposal Options Cautiously 4:00 - 4:50 p.m. e Education Sessions • Alternative Project Delivery Methods for Wastewater Infiwtrucnu,e Rehabilitation • Cana&s Commitment to Municipal Infi-astrxicture: Get In On These Funding Opportunities • Establishing a Fleet Management System • Extracting Enhanced Asset Data fiom Roadway Video Imaging innovative Tools for NPDES Storm Water Phase Land 11 Compliance • National Mutual Aid and Resource Management Initiative • Remote Control of Traffic in Emergencies Otight-of-Way Acquisition the -Right Way' - Survivor — Local Government! Tips for Job Security in.a Political Environment - Team Building to Diversity • The a.m.azing Tale ofTenthill Creek Bridge • The Lowdown on pavement Resurfacing Alternatives 5 0 OMAN O-V 6 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract Map No. 31379, Legacy Villas, Centex Homes RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution granting conditional Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Tract Homes. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: D STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Map No. 31379, Legacy Villas, Centex Tract Map No. 31379 is located west of Eisenhower Drive and north of Coachella Drive (Attachment 1). This residential development will consist of 18 residential lots on approximately 44.6 acres (Attachment 2). On September 16, 2003, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map No. 31379. The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map, which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. To date, the SIA (Attachment 3) has been executed by the developer and the associated securities have been received. The Final Map is technically complete and is being routed for signatures. The developer expects that all signatures will be in place and submitted to the City within the time allowed for its conditional approval. '0 As a result, City staff has prepared a Resolution, which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and SIA. The approval is contingent upon receipt within 30 days (September 16, 2004) of a technically correct Final Map, suitable for recording by the County Recorder, with all required signatures (except the City Clerk). Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 Adopt a Resolution granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract Map No. 31379, Legacy Villas, Centex Homes; or 2 Do not adopt a Resolution granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract Map No. 31379, Legacy Villas, Centex Homes; or 3 Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Ti othy R. nass , P. E. ublic Work irec or/ City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement 2 91 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-(Clerk's Office will enter) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 31379, LEGACY VILLAS, CENTEX HOMES, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps; and WHEREAS, the City Council, as a matter of policy, allows a subdivider to have City staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to City staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including City staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of City staff; and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional City staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional City staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. 3 940 Resolution No. 2004- Tract Map No. 31379, Legacy Villas Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The final map for Tract Map No. 31379 is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before September 16, 2004. Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms to the tentative tract map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. A. Place appropriate securities in accordance with the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement. B. Finalize the final Tract Map and obtain all necessary signatures. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on September 16, 2004. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval 4 93 Resolution No. 2004- Tract Map No. 31379, Legacy Villas Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES:Council Members (Clerk's Office will enter) NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 5 4 TRACT No. 5,1379 PROJECT - LOCATION AVENIDA FERNANDO ATTACHMENT 1 W W Cp E-+! o yFl V1= /�F �4 E R i; 0 w W A AVENUE 50 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 6 4.5 h\58100\M~WM=.dwn 5/27/n. ATTACHMENT 2 CA�IfJI'1 auR AItL 10 s�01A1� ulw W: ooNlelt Al. M MN41M A10 I1eooIlolla W AIMt MNMOMNMfoN M MNO�I WRMI M OIiMNRIII[ N1tllElt t11L VIE N00 ONA CK 10 M CRT W to GUNK UPI 0 CAM oRIA 11, FOR Kwic MINUET AD-u1tNr F1NM�Osm Ao AM FAMEIMIF Nat mm me FOR W NOMFlM me e0Ri2M W NONAGE Ali GRAM. MaM U WM UK M M 1Na>IwM1D M Lm A tI1tOm �. NallllM OEl1011A1O1 M'M07K Mtttt3l'..AIO LOF 0 KMMIY/m M'G1D0OW AOCNM EAemeMt. AMA AR13N1 AK IMA11m M PIMMA1t MR� AID FOR Imm PUPOW! FOR 00ILVeK► AND Ulf o1ImIM WRM AMM TRN� i IS NOwr O10Ia11E 10 IN Cmf W !A 01M11 RME10 Man EAKIMIN M MNO A NOIKOIA 19 HUM WM FOR OeD1aNON IC 1W OWDR U WUN Wg a lA1WIR. MAM6MNM FOR i �1WOt NO 1MWNION lAMrOME1 VWA WO A 10110001 F. IWAVO OeMMM1D M >19l AO Lw 0 KlIAWD At-GRAMM.y ACUM VWMR AM M AM i OElI01UI1D AS COUP Ott NW. 1K SJUM 1111 80 0®IaIn 11= W an AN GROt I OROt .11lON MAID IA1N, m MUMA:Y. OOIMNRMIC-, micaMAMICT. Jr. raIM OPOrK, COMMOL, UK AO M11i A PpILM FOIRMw AD AFPIMIBWM2K Me ! MaDYE OLum N16M'0101M WM M OONININUOMA, iF11MMI0N AO MtNIGWIQ IN OW K INIMJK OFFER FOR 0®ICAlION 10 M mft DMONIION AN MA Dw an AL POW MRAEiM 0IOMN ON in MIM me M A1M mwL FIK(K N " ON WAN MKf W AID AANCOIF 10 AL FRMOK MRK NN1N ON AM W. FOIL 1NK 80111010N, Lem OONNIMIOAW aRCRMaiL OII, M XftL IW MAMRBWIOE. 01 g- m1011, N�C10 XPLACEI K AD Rl11aK WRO1r GKB, gICIt, >IM101tll, FACLOU AO MMI QMRA71 rAt 00 w = A .NmiKft ONA AO 11RM1 WARN 19 IMB►LM N ANOWN ►, 11CLUNKs FOR OFOI KAOL WDOW1010, I011118WO i IK101000 14 mvm AID muc van FUM'OKM FOR IN MOLE low w 0mom 1, am MOOCeMMORl. AD AMMMIi1 AND ICT O WINM AMM rAm ( CDW NOIr1EMr A 11flFIDA MAW ►M1 M r i so OBIN1f F170. E{A1L OOMOIImm i 0 A 0 ft OOIMIOROION, MNNONO ►A111Mt ►AM. mom IMAM M PIKIMINF �Nglq, Mom. A OMAMNK.aolrat+lRoK M GPO MF LOU MI�MORWRAI W OF mr,BMW Firm ion o°Q01°Iot1 c�N ►N00° M MIrnMMIaR Ma aF ana1L L41 M L t10fiM - P111MI001 sun W CM00I0M Doom, W &L ON A1L_ OAY W . SXK M N A NOFMY F1KIC N AD FOR MAD ma PDMOIWLY APPfIIRD MKIPPOM ON M ON W M111iAC10RY E1Imm 10 K M PU MOM WNW1 P11000110,1100011 10 0011001119 lAl IW 110111I 1lNIMMMM AD AUOWMkM TO K ANT MY 1fMl M sAK N 11Kt AIRImm CAPN0K1. maim MN A6t >MWIMw Onim mmumR M -memo OR M GRIN WON Ewa.W No M Pmen mm Dom 1N1 NIRMNMOIL 1tINwM N/f NwOw NOAAM PWUC N AND FOR SW 11KMW FIMIICfAL FM W 11ACO MY COMMON armn --- ILL j ON A�� W OF . 1001. KF n � A N01Nr PUM N AO IF01 1lO MTAR PGIMONKL1r Awl FvmOftw MADAM 10 W/P001 ON W Mrs W 1101710100 EMNNO: TO K M FatOaN WOK MMM0 AK almomms T01A "m N mmw AM AmmomOs lb IK mw MY GKNw M f am N 140A ANN01l1N® All 101 AO vw MY mm 0100W1w ON M m mM = M F19gONM OR M DOW WON OMF W NO M I OIMONM ACID, 01=0 M NNMUM NtIlE21 MY "m I OWI PUC N AD FOR 2A0 SWE ItPRMMOfIL PIACt a M � MI w COIM AM ON I �. 1 NUNN OOMY im wout M mom awm TO ME w M nm W 01t1>C101es OF M M1'm 11AOMR011 0 1 m Pal Nxtam NO.Is-A owe wm 3% "1% iNT AI AWR ON NW W Mlle ONR — R0 81CC ICOS OR AINW IM0111aM1011 W FAMAI M FOR hSCOSM Powat FAMAWS M 0708 , N11 OL Ommr aw =KWO POW I NM'J1EMr' c mry ANT 1MOOt AUMOIMY wmw 10 M[ M11 M1M01i m NL 70-2� wo MIRING! 12. 107% 1 MUM ON WKY W MCal vwuY CaSAM G11 MI M 01NCOW OF VISDMIMi FOR OOMEICRO NFMOt AM vmwGON 1 a1►oees AM OFFGw MOImIL it 9 M rwlE�rUWAMW rr, a on INC M Wit Wit OF to OINK Count or xmWK 1a a taKllolMlr► TRACT' NO, 31379 BBlla. A l or MU. I a►11A UK NL Jm- m, 1�OIN� OCIO�!.6 W. M mm"w N0. 2M-8=4 o11Dt 0 NBOw I i NO," O M11r, CII�tJflom M00 CONMIIL11110 WXK =04 Wff M. OOM M L.lAW Kww FUD 1111-lW . R M. N 10OIL. AF PAK AT MGAM$f a M an aat W M or W NJ1 OIINM N1% FU WN L iM Cam Primnemt Mrs Dew NIKMINM 01AAMOU w coM1111tcNt AR[ ooMPAM IW MAP WMi P11aIND W K OIt 1MIOGt MY MM11i.'1wI MOM 1AMD WON A FM30 MUMMY N OOIiOIIMNICE MART M IMINMM9KIR W M 1>VwYKON IMr AQ AM.1Abl OR1MW1![ Rim 11101AW W CM= M1mviaoN mumv. w1�11rrtls�AIMpL. am I mwr MR AIA< AL M Av_ Mara ME w M OAI NNem AD ooalrr M PaoNM NOW% a ANT MY 1ML At M1t N MUCH AO ANT MAD MNMAMIIO AK MUD O 10 W 11R MU lla 70 K RIII m" , 1 m"a sawn 11N111M INII MAP vimvmMLLY PH 10 10 w FRAM I1101WLY x"m A9MOM IMP. + .200A OW u u, W OMNI LL 403 IV. 0 wate'!� 1 MW 1NR 10K 1 HAS MOM M MRM Mill OF AM1CT AM NA» (NOW W NM1t 0) sun AD I AM MMIMiw ANN1 MAD kw M unsarLr OOIMKCLN Oft .2004 C NM O N 11NN111 1.INIwF MtATE ANT I HAS m0MDE0 M A SSO) MAP W.rm N& 31=1 OOIIMIIRNM W IAt MN t M Wl MON s1MMN NepNON • >MON1wRMlx AMM1 LL iN10 NaNO W 1i11MWAACMKw WD & Me AT MIME W N9FROM►L W M AKA1AllE MAP ME M OMl11D UK cm UMW R Awsm RAL IIO, 48Ma .1VW PUB B WM Ov ecievemi aMMMe11. cm,a LA Gum cy cum ` in & 4m CIFF am AD 101-ama Am* W -w aoam Or im an dF u OU11M1 1 mw M0K AMf MAD 1;RY m 1A N1IDIMAt_I N1Y ON M — MIM . 1N10A. M In AIMST W Na 3W% NO AOOlIs M O■IOMAON w MR R FOR PUSS iRELF AID Van PAP OUL AD tUMDO'MR PURR tNmm AID SOMOM! OF WGVX GIOIOOIOY 1 11 M 00 t11s A WARM 0, NWWK Me M FUM10 U11RY U=MMR'M A$ FBI I'm IM?11E01L omm CRY am AD 101-mm Cm or = an COUNC . an W LA aim I ID COtRY AMM A00NwN 10 M W 1NMM OFFICE m W im MYIB. um AK i10 1� AM010T 1K PRDPKIr WIN 10101 IM►. FOR tM m F4 opmr. rm tMM1CIFML /R 1oOMi, A0D fN 1Fia1L A11MJ11lew Oai6CID All llwo. MN00T mmumpm Oaums M ANOI " A Unk M NK' 1ET FIIMN M Mlgl M 10 K PAL Mi001MK1 OIL omm WX COtUMOA - ti111 �O 1 � CMRRY AMR A M010 N WON W NNMi NMI Nun No FND WN M MOM W MIPOMMOM1t W M OOU WON M Fmw W AL 1M11M► MOW?. oNNIROIID AMMOIMM011 COUIC D M 7 11MCN� MMMORAL LACAL; NN AL >Fa W ran W Im Iw WN M COW MDOIDD NK A IMI AWOR We MM NOT 1ET PAMIMIE no MAD MOID IMM KOI OULY AP/M M K MAD OF SUMI NOMI mm arI 110I MOND a MCI a ACE 00ND OF MIIPOOam MIn COI MMML R M wv pN cow ��1101� CILl�MI FURMIWIF U MO:MOM 100M W 111: RA MOON WP ACT M O011A0111D OF M FMUAG O o1NM1M W 1 mum AO/MR o1NMR NIG a mg 96 sm"m, 2101 MM 12. 1q1 N BOOK A, PAK 3114 MarmlAr AI FAIGIOM M mw W M mm Fat rum ImIOM AND MMMMM W M /MONDE OIIOIKI NO COMW V ANO Fowl I m m Re0010D AVOW 16, 1M1 mom IN, MK N1 W OFlICY1. RNOOIDR `A�e°uM°ii M Meoa�omoF O"�'MMRidAND lr 2oo�-MM (�"I�F a,°wO�iKoa1R 01MO M A10 ! PfMMOMD OCIOMIR 316 FM MINMq 11A M NMna a► OrrAft MmwOM. c W0 "CM Harlot W Na1-c1aMNa r0aMla Fat OW FM AD P1OM:IIw1 A1OW0 F1Mf0lD MI P 0 0 m R F 011R 30. 2000 Al 11MMAS T ML 2093-1MMm W O FKW I moll M IK W W IA V^ =MIY MOM OM $= W OR MM sw 2 w 101NNE1si TRACT NO, 31379 NO A >N YI I.OF "A 1 W OF 12R N0. 2001-`lit 1�01� 001�t 2�, 2001 As MnNuwENr Na 2001 4,W4� omo *ADS' as a► aournr, at�arM. r-- I I I t I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 tar N LOT M 10 I �PARCEL 8 L I ?OOi-881 0 I I AM F1711N0 Y We TAOM L0. 4M R0 11!/t7. IRKm orow K "DIM 1 AM A AT V AND OWTAOOM I R OR m w 1AO� Lt. 4N3 N OONCIEIE IC Q AT AIL UN CH ME' OR i UN 00IU6t •— O— Imm to aF I m OONlllut>M NWANW 30w aRtr W. 00mm L.us - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s------------------ INDEX; MAP ><T NQ-----------------I I I � LOR P j I PARCEL B 4►I LLA Z001-8t l I I idsd 13 • If � L07 j I OGGI A /I 12o C I LOT 0 14 --�. 11 i i2.e wr I 1s ' I e 4 ♦ �y -� �. 3 PARCEL 1 N LLA =i-aei to im 1 1 1 �1 1 1 *; a 1 1 1 1 \ - T 1 1 \ a 17 Ip• ti_ 1 \ ��� M.MN G!oEUNUNKMa10KJUAT Mann MI0�1 10AI& LL-1 M o ML R Comm POINO Ot WM04 mm ROR[ NtRta. I MONtRtE1 " tRIOMM 'sIEP am k KT Lff L 0001a 110E ON IM MONUMflITA110N Ei1W FOR IM MAP. IRKJ U OMKK :L I I Haar MAP =TAN 18 NUM EM LOTO Ara EilEllm LOTM I TAACT MAP CONTARIO 44.012 AW4M 06 -low 3 Iasi' I I i/34 I u T I PARCEL 8 LLA 2DOi-891 1 K 1FEKOMM1 F � I I� L)T Q \� 1m , II IS 2003-mrn4.I ------L1 �t _ AL Or ► ON�REOOI W L PARCEL 2 a Alt im aFtia TMi oa N I LLA 2no1-eei i t Nvotsloc oouNW. CAL FotrllA, NENa 0 3o too aoo m 400-------. wSt� — ►.1 NIMCRWu i aoumr or MwAK SM s cMu+aww► air a s I• •+srs TRACT NO. 31379 1 �10 URVE TABLE A SON a IMIICB, 1 Of t�R tNE N0. -a11 1�01�® OCI ! 34 SM AO� � • ���� NO I IILTA MMIR NIC Lo : RWW fit' 1i•!' I0i OOIAlIL1Np HOYO� Jppj SWM. Od�cN LtA101 H \ \ N 17!/'01'E IUY \ \\ \\ ice'/ ice'' ���' ; 1♦`N /'• !Ol \ \\ \\ \ass mw N0: i i 1 N t'Z ,s•[ OW Nd; 4 I N PARCEL i / 17 as V4 `4 • -- —� LOTIT i WLW ` � ti♦+(\�L��21 � � I I I • ------------ N ' / If AN K 1, I I N p0000 E ♦♦ .� �♦` wr H to WOMEI Yim 1 ( �• 4 TIE N 00•WWE K",.% ' Jam♦ 4 \ I Mir N f0Y0'W E nU?l �� 1 \ N /!'3i16'� ♦y tialr I U A Mai -NJ AL 10,10-m won Am arm= no w AK FEED N�00-D0 ° W�,,, � � mm"Im w um �I ao W. cuakI / I Imill""MIN TO :V Tp C.9H6.101I O mon T111i� n tN1iwON• N OlL1 NO I mw eoll� a �s�Iloo NiWNUM FIND VON N00I r"0aie>, Fait OR a u GM mmspo L— — —. — — — — — sa osrnl� oN •� Na � — . J 98 I ........ ..__.__..__..___. Ii i. N M CITY W 1A MOM 0=0 W MWAI M SM OF OAS/MN *W 4 OF 10 Neli TRACT NO, 31379 �allo ar ar �a us rt Na �001�1/1 1160o1�olp oCiallt gal, Soot �irort Na �0o1-bi007� a�naKNDi" i1Do�io� a �o�' oounr. arwuraw� w0� ooNN�nto Noy m 2003 am W. OMM MOM sic 9 \� OHM , "� it �'' \i \` \\\ \\\4 i' L____ , sM •NgIT No: • ! 1 1 1 y _--1 •a Mw "M • It 1 1 i\\� \ SIQT 110. • j - It It �4 ' i { `\It kit if `� N115'�� \\ rql \ \ y v3� d It y m to \`�+ V6 Irk. -------------- - L-Mi° i. MF W01 lour &An= FOR m - N WOW E 7lUr � 0 me W W IA S M N NMI ML EXIQMOR eElY�las IWo oaTlwC�a >>�1 11 i�lo�q � a loM mm l W -mf, ME low AND Md� pm moolm Or sou As 6°OIMI a M m RED N NOOK 11% PAS 27 Q Dill OF N im om w AE OOINIIY I�IOI R OF RM� uai o a u a " O IWI QmFow ow lnimm ww f sa � la of ata 99 i' w W amr ar &A OUNK army a►1NNpMg& I of OWWM wwEr b W 10 llwEl TRACT NO, 31379 MAM AS MWW NQ IOOt 1W4. = N%W W 9001 YMM Boa OMWA>wa halt, ow W. DOWN LSAM mm N \\pptC4M CURVE T^DLE m- NI = A u 1O0t 1eR er.�r} M JMTA SDK Me U�iT aw ITom noIIVARN (ID- VOW le CWA6*mk Wr N va 3 4r � l : low ar W►°N iae� IC4r !' low 74M S i 3T*W 4W 3fW A �" tN4 arelaaa�r � Von mffm 10 °o'"F' o Ur( W u aura► ♦♦♦ ♦♦ ty� a eWE �R = S N0 NO of •♦Y ' ; _ SCALE V-50' i 12 Now NQ 7 �„ �� ♦� >� >141 NOS. • r 7 i `♦ _ `. on amp N0. All P-1 V N 1 1�17f/6d �_A. S E (—N f or« gown com �jdslaMAn � 1 Its _ i3.� '3ff Lpt L 20A �E 7 sQ SMI NM 4 we Ad S` r r 4- aar PC j °Lill M -spar Na 7 I'\ 57 ♦ Sa MW c \ \ \ \\ \\ b \ \ Z \\ \\ \\ SR filar N0. 4 1101E ALL EXi0M0t afMAlOs AI��p�7Aa afbbl IwI�N Alb immmm QF JUMV AS w im W tlw OOIMIY I bfJt OF INI61l OOLMIIY. t�IILigMNil ,�� \ 0 is so m 0»ow lw"-o 0� i 1 N IM CITY OF LA GUNK COIMIY a INM MEe Wn a f"U M a= 4 or 10 IN= TRACT NO, 31379 NNIO A IIMIUw01F W FMICL 1 OF LOR LM AWN== NQ �M1-1�1 OCi�I AtOMIMMW NO. !M1-GIW4 OFMPL flo I OF IMYl11 �'001�M1NpMw1, CONPA1M0 IIOIIl1�lR'001 ow W. OOIIICN LSAM1 i. " NM ALL am 1400r Daum AK EM 2 MR mm Of IIKIYEY AO 1 . atrm �p m' 70 UP& A4 53WOw �ooe w �rorE M Mcr (ID-- Wn 7o ava►a: Pm eum Firm me e- o n M a �eaia No eMoear : aioaoroF L-IL71' %VUK w• 5.71' ®' Rio u� w m o�ta� 1i0 Me lrt8.71' 10 W a LA Q M► Up AL 1 _ 3001man >NM�R - 'BE7r _____�. N E err �I� g,'Y' SCAE 1*-W � a MMIOf t-r47AC (lh- 4�71W IT j E N 1r00�M l 1 37W A-4ron r _ 39 tNMNLor 0 00 V Mf 1*44JVW i3 s goldM 1�Mplol ' �.♦♦ 41", ice �� � ♦ `♦ ♦`♦ � �� �� NNNC1* WO AIL Af'E M NEIM00 IJMAQ � d n�'♦♦♦ ��' ♦�♦` +� i � t� 4 MN 9HW L-MW J LIST ,4 N�s (♦ `' S` 3NM/ME M RiMN100 4►�` � �� s, �'41lei ,+�♦ 1 • \ URVE TABLE 1! W4V KV N61!' N B Ory s _ ice' www uw COURSE TABLE >wi MNRT NI0. S 5 w3ow 46W "Ar Nt N >fT1TN'L IAM' :r L I i i•1 w OW UAW iM NZl�V Z4M' FAQ 7 1�'Me law ow N N !7'47'p'E 71JN' q'i17!' 1tZB) ZIA1' M N MM' tT M fiYf7M' am IMP !7 N i7V71K UW 1 t! SI NIQ. `NO ts1 n rw�r e� 4Ra!' i i. i i N Im MY W !A QIA1 K O XW W MM MDR an W CA MUM NRET 7 OF 10 NNEti TRACT NO. 31370 M1N10 A S AAMON W !NM'8 1 W tAf R NOr J001-1�1 IMg01Mlp OCIO�t !A l001 N NMIIMNBR NQ 1001-d10074r O�OIOS w AIWBIM� OQINIIYi OI11/OMNA� M 00"Pium NWAMN% 3003 air w. WIM LtAM NM EXIEIMOR ova= Aw MO CURVE TABLE M eoWi 1iZ PAK v GF. OF , "trl� tea 10�0O� " No I[LTA Mm ANc ut 11E OFF1C� OF im OO m OF WMW .tt�y 1 r>aryr IIIIIr tsar t M'!1'71' 4lal' 7tA' COURSE TABLE M 4 f79t'tl' aw tzar _ IIiTA1RE ND �Mtlt =Tmm ♦ 7 mMN Eamm FM 0 It N am Q N Wr '�� t N N B'tNl1'V Gm lYt t � w � 13 N trsftlt IYAV " N 30'14'W 1ta7' H m' fi LYMA FM DOiflIIC 14 N ZM'tt4rV UW 10 N if't1Yt'[ 3W �■i00040 6�,_ Nd tNt00ni !IAl In L'I N srmlg nw " Iry lld CNT W IA Q1A111A IOR IlaNtt 16 N MI",N71'E 21LW x N i0603ro 'EV � �•is 601N>A W M ommo .y 0 N 4r4 Ua1' 2N N it'p7t'E iL!' � P " 0 N 4r40 M'L VAT em AR ®- A &00 1001 t/Km ION t1 N I6't1" nw YANY MArOtfa dNNDO®10 N N 42r40W ttW u tutrtA a N K•40'M'E ump toto� M� y�dw N p'1071'V OW 2 IM PAMWM 14 N 40.40'M'[ MY W AIO Ol MINK a N 49'1 WV MW tt N 46•43'M"[ MW i n 13 a0r4r4r (i N 00WE N p'S om / +�y %, ��sm AL it-lo ' f ��Q7• � N 7T B20 �EL-14 N JYOWE ��n Nq 23W XW cD- N Ivlorodw� aaar2� a \ 21.00' 1*-5w / �� t�r1BJ.1{� won lr2S.fT V' �■4Q40'2f' N M'24'b�E W-47.W Sir W i : Awl'. 12 \ wn AL far 01 ^ / i j % w • , �fy,i/jn Jam IM AL �. wo % UNAL N I \ \ \ `\s VA L-LW 'G \ \ \ 0 es 20 N0 u0 tM 5 `\ \ w MQT m d i I. I TRACT NO, 31370 oa A aUMMM a I a wr tics �a.'oot-�� �ooaotn ace st,00p l Ma �oo�-a�eos* a�no� �oo�o� ar ooumr. awnaMr►, NM AL 1119-0 ORM No ONw-F! Fs s peon ME ImOIb NO FM IIBDOIID OF lUalEtt a`\�`• `\\ me M on 1 M W an w g\\ \ � N ,f24 Oi E M m aml w COW Timm MR � of � uw i tar o LorwIs 10 tMAL oe CURVE TABLE 1 12 i No I LTA WAM A11C I.iT 1 >R[ >M+aT NM 7 me sum n ♦ ♦ 1 K �♦ � 1 W 1 I g 1 I sNwr M 7 ; lAff is \\\ \ \ \1 4 SCALE 1'-50* .49 1 \ UNAL 7-0N 1w 9 a s \ `a5 No \ f i N NOO % looleopo N-) VS\ 1 \ N 1?,6'01'E 1623' ON 3w NO. t0 J \\ \\ 10UM pj� III �i MOWN MOM \ � �' 1 � � 17 Q]- A CKMd tp1001u�NC M!� NIL i NAMOaIa n a► tletnoc A 1 ® an Maw"o®IatEl, yo> N / { 4A 1 1 M IM MY ar u QWft CUM or worMN, =K or aIt UM ttm • w 10 tt� TRACT NO, 31379 t1t>r10 twlat W t1W10� t Cr tOr uM[ AMMNa 90ot-mot MWM =MM �, :oot K Nq, ,toot-eteoH, oniow, aroE' aoiMir, cK sts s v Na 3 l 17 7 134 i sus GHM ML a �. M,�� 4>,v�o, C.V.WA EASEMENT q �+ �' l %'� 24' N M!{'6dE I 1�172 j 1 DT 01 i i �J ' e 1 it {� 1,'Q cq 1 V �- ' �,�► �l PARCEL, I C9 � ' LLA 200-J-361 sl I=Q v LAT N W24WE sit 1 s t, ant LA7 �„ � t� + s�l�. to �� =•rant WX ,, / AA/ » SHW N0. i y,�p,,w � �' ►Tfl'�OiPEUff H riiAIL 1r1�34 % IV 01 Nil ap % Sol a PA Aff i N 99 "Olf E 781.37' \\` N W63wc \ - `may 230f2' ff� NI, 0116MOR po ONEIIIOEt tAON PARCEL, 2 "'�►� � yy /' qr � � ul0olo � ref Moow or Ni LLA IMMM A as Mt mMil Fm I + y'' U �' MUM emloaE� TO Meg Nn - IN Mill nor= No a u aMa roM wM o No � a »faMOE Nlo oaloalar .1 mil. rloMalM aoe t>aa u�rt PoM $ , p�, M�pm URN nMr= omloaMs >oCRY W IA GM 1 NttO NOS iI SCALE 1._3(Y 1 i ' LA QUWTA , F�.S Ey3/6 : a' = r GOLF' J:STATJrS `\ � ME; 34/D"a -----,--+---------------�' r N lr62' N 163.a6' CA AVQIIOVI PEMtM U 0 A 30 a !1 N M CRY Oi IA QIAIK OpIM1Y 0f NIRIl�. 1M w amww R aw 10 w 10 IN= TRACT NO, 31379 IFMO A »IIKINsO11 OF �MIIDO. 1 OF 1M UK AO OMW NL l001-101 I�OIOm O� !& l001 m 0owpi BR NQ SM-510074 WROML Amm w IrY01 00tMlY. AAIWIMK --------------------------------------- -CURVE TABLE of W JMTA R AIC LiT �� \ M I ` e0010 1 i N a0'QMw 2fiF 1 I \v�Nd W 1 `\\ eM...r.� `\ Lb 1 I � = I I I --- 4-1--- ---1 p_ \ 1 N ww E ,4&7r I N N fO0O'i0Q'E I 117.77 I __ _- _1 �' ----------_ N QO0'O11.-/d 17 II �'; N TK\jrD�E sos sneer No. i 1 ' 1 1 --------------------------------------- DETAIL "A" saR TO saps wa111s1 amlolo®KUCVWNWM 70 m Na=IQwmm /�Ol�ff NO mMOfWIA WMFMMM me s a lowK me BMFAolcr WHUM i ism iM in I am 10 arauasro► S sM ! 1OR >YIYMI'! Iglt'i1 Al0 Ms aF s>�l0! CITY of LA QUINTA ATTACHMENT 3 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT MAP NO. 31379 OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of by and between CENTEX HOMES, a NEVADA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or Tract map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract No. 31379 (the "Tract") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements"). ). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A!', and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security, shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby 1 secured. 1 1 of 7 TAProject Development Division\Development Projects\Agreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy ViIlas_31379\0FFSITE_SIA.doc B. improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. vernment 2 Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of nt of Treasury Ocular 570 Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Departure (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial Wne al institutions st that rating of, subject oo regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange better and a commitment reliability rating of (of the Los Angeles County Treasurers office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions ns itutio�nthe meeting complton the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary carry t of the Improvements are on deposit, gu aranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds availthe letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and thatt t in initten cluding pem nd need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payin , of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest the 5) A P ears after recordation require the installation of the improvements sooner than two (2) y final map or Tract map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the improvements ents n at l include be the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvementsno that tereu may may erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and app nto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's P appraisal expense through an approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal s t°east Twenty Percent (20r local government, %) of any agency of the state, federal, or local government provide the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in tars of City, asspecified City or Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, a yoption, responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The mo nto f the of performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100 /o) of the estimated constructing the Improvements, including paymentp of Ian check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. T to amount t as f Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance y, P otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, Tract map or waiver of Tract map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty 18 2oi7 greements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex Legacy Villas_31379\OFFSITE_SIA.doc T:\Project Development Division\Development ProjectsW i security if the warranty security is of the same form and from teource as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 4) of SECTION 3.13., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal ubdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half assistance and financial advice, S of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performanceh reduction shall be foas `r ork an progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no s amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4 If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security of the ll be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, 1 Warranty TAProject Development Division\Development Projects\Agreements\S1A\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy �Ilas_31379\OFFSITE_SIA.doc 3 of 7 security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdividers obligations hereunder. 7. Force Maieure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdividers control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8 Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form end substance of the to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. Subdivider shall place survey 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval vis ons of Sectionsimprovements, sec. of the Subdivision Map Act monuments in accordance with the pro and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdividers engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. TAProject Development Division\Development Projects%greements\SIA\SIAs in ProgressCentex_Legacy vllas_31379\0FFSITE_SIA.doc 20 4of7 ve Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized repr manta la a Belt evi ned to view the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Impro be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and required in Paragraph 1c1 i hereinafter,' the City Engineer Subdivider has provided revised plans as shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Coun 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As-C o rictefor d," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate he improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. if Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against ann losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of o r i any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions o Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severabillty. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions. A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered .or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. A �O 21 1 T:\Pro}ect Development Division\Development ProjedsWgreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy villas 31379\OFFSITE_SIA.doc 5 of 7 { C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. g D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing E. In ent of its reasonable attorneys fees from the non -prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt paym party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: City Clerk Subdivider Address: CENTEX HOMES 901 North Green Valley'Parkway, Suite 140 Hend NV 89074 ) 990-0 0 /1%Irieal By: Date Title: oo0� By: Date Title: Reviewed and Approved. City Engineer Approved as to Form: Date City Attorney Date mentMSIA%S1As in ProgressTentex Legacy Villas 31379koFFSITE_SIA.doc 22 1 6 of 7 isi TAProject Development DivonlDevelopment Pr*cts\Agree j Exhibit A OFF -SITE SECURITY — TRACT MAP NO. 31379 Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or. will be const ucteodbyofreleased by CSycurity. for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called up Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum Of two 0%jalof leases total of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less(below the amount performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance. Labor & Materials Eisenhower Drive $ 321,670 $ $ 321,670 71,270 Water Meandering Wall and 12' Sidewalk $ $ 71,270 75,250 $ 75,250 50,000 Traffic Signal Modification 5,000 $ $ 59,150 Perimeter & Median Landscaping $ 9 15_ 59,0 $ _ $ 577,340 $ 577,340 Totals Standard 10% Contingencey $ 57,734 $ $ 57,734 635,074 Total Construction Cost $ 635,074 Professional Fees, Design 10% $ 63,507 $ $ 63,507 63,507 Professional Fees, Const 10% $ 63,507 No Plans Contingency 19% $ 120,664 $ 120,664 Bond Amount $ 882,752 $ 882,752 23 + TAProject Development Division\Development Projects\Agreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy Villas_31379\01FFSITE_SIA.doc 1 �.:'' 7 of 7 CITY OF LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION /MPRO VEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT MAP NO. 31379 ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into thii0s day of by and between CENTEX HOMES, a NEVADA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or Tract map (the "Map") of unit of l nd in the suant of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract No. 31379 ( ) pur to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the' "Improvements"). ). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A!', and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, tee nd warranty of the hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve the completion nand aacceptance of the Improvements for a period of one year following Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. 1 of 7 TAProject Development Division\Development Projects\Agreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex Legacy Villas_31379\ONSITE_SIA_2.doc 24 „ '� 3 B. Improvement security shall conform to Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of R-2 or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2 year after e r shall ionproof the final map or Tract map for which the Improvements are required. ide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6 An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government,20%a ny agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent ( ) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C TAProject Development Division\Development Projects\Agreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy Villas_31379\ONSITE_SIA_2.doc All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions ofoE Exhibit he. The estimated to f the of performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100 / ) of constructing the Improvements, including paymentp of Ian check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, Tract map or waiver of Tract map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty l 2of7 25 security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1 For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.13., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement authorization expiration from City of theunlestime for performance stated in this Agreement, without express surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) if City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, ffranty 3of7 T:\Project Development Division\Development Projects\A9reements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy Villas_31379\ONSITE_SIA_2.doc 4. 5. 7 4 security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider under a obtain allpermits r permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performedpermit shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvement mrove v des requires I use it necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required and agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real .property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or.conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdividers obligations hereunder. Force Maieure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdividers control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. Survev Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final, approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdividers engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. 27 4 f 7 T:\Project Development Division\Development ProjectsWgreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy Vllas_31379\ONSITE_SIA_2.doC �. 4 0 Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions. A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the ,A heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. Ay"� ' 28 TAProject Development Division\Development Projects\Agreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex_Legacy Villas_313MONSITE_SIA_2.doc 5of7 F. A reement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this eeither party to this g ,greement. be ovemed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of 'his Agreement shall 9 ,alifornia. to this Agreement,. the prevailing n the event of any dispute between the of part sonable with attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing )arty shall be entitled to prompt payment of its re )arty. P Any failure or delay by either arty in asserting any of its rights and remedies loss LV aov ded f shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or reme P hereunder. - the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first IN WITNESS WHEREOF, written above. CITY: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 7601777-7075 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: City Clerk Subdivider Address: CENTEX HOMES Valle Parkway, Suite 140 901 North Greeny Henderson, NV 89074 By Tit B) Title: P__ Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Date Approved as to Form: Date City Attorney to 29 6of7 TAProject Development avision0evdopment projectsWgreements\SiA%S1As in Progress\Centex Legacy Yllas 31379\0NSITE_SIA.doc y Exhibit A ON -SITE SECURITY — TRACT MAP NO. 31379 Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases O performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Grading Drainage Street Improvements Driveway/Parking Areas & Drainage Parking Area Improvements Phase 2 & 3 Domestic Water (Phase 1) Domestic Water (Phase 2) Sanitary Sewer (Phase 1) Sanitary Sewer (Phase 2) Dry Utilities Retention Basin Landscaping Monumentation Totals Standard 10% Contingencey Total Construction Cost Professional Fees, Design 10% Professional Fees, Const 10% No Plans Contingency 23% Bond Amount $ 614,520 $ 614,520 $ 495,420 $ 495,420 $ 138,450 $ 138,450 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 274,840 $ 274,840 $ 327,740 $ 327,740 $ 286,100 $ 286,100 $ 384,100 $ 384,100 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 846,000 $ 846,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ 4,437,170 $ 4,417,170 $ 443,717 $ 441,717 $ 4,880,887 $ 4,858,887 $ 488,089 $ 485,889 $ 488,089 $ 485,889 $ 1,122,604 $ 1,117,540 $ 6,9799670 $ 6,948,210 30 � 7 0f 7 TAProject Development Division\Development Projects\Hgreements\SIA\SIAs in Progress\Centex Legacy vllas_31379\ONSITE_SIA_2.doc �. 41 wl�k& T4ht 4 44P 49 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Changes to the Recreation Activities Coordinator Job Description RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: (� CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve changes to the Recreation Activities Coordinator job description. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Community Services Department has requested the revision of the Recreation Activities Coordinator job description (Attachment 1). The 2004/05 budget for the Community Services Department includes funding for a Recreation Activities Coordinator and a Senior Center Activities Coordinator. The Department would like to incorporate the job duties of the Senior Center Activities Coordinator into the Recreation Activities Coordinator job description. Both of these positions have similar job duties. The incorporation of these job duties under one job description would provide management with greater flexibility in rotating staff between the Senior Center and City Hall as demands require. The incorporation of the job duties under one job description will allow the City to eliminate the Senior Center Activities Coordinator job description from the classification plan. The current staffing arrangement would remain in place with a Recreation Activities Coordinator at City Hall and one at the Senior Center. Since both positions fall within the same salary range there will be no fiscal impact. Both positions are currently vacant. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the changes to the Recreation Activities Coordinator job description; or 2. Do not approve the changes to the Recreation Activities Coordinator job description; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Recreation Activities Coordinator 2 THE CITY OF LA Q UINTA RECREATION ACTIVITIES COORDINATOR GENERAL STATEMENT OF JOB Under general supervision, plans, coordinates and implements a wide variety of marketing, recreational and leisure programs for the community. REPORTS TO: Community Services Director and/or Recreation Supervisor or Senior Center Supervisor. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS The following duties are normal for this position. These are not to be construed as exclusive or all-inclusive. Other duties may be required and assigned. • Ability to work with the public in a professional and appropriate manner; • Plans, organizes, coordinates and leads marketing, athletic, recreational, educational, social and cultural activities designed to serve the needs of the community; • Assists in planning, organizing and coordinating activities for the Senior Center; • Assists in planning workshops, seminars, classes and special events; • Assists in establishing and maintaining effective relations with the public, government offices, service agencies, volunteers and fellow employees; • Assists in training and supervising assigned regular part-time and volunteer personnel; • Assists with public relations, publicity releases, and monthly calendar of activities and events; • Maintains records, statistics, files and prepares regularly required reports; Maintains current reference and information files on services provided by local agencies; • Prepares schedules, rosters and league information for youth and adult sports; • Conducts registration for a variety of programs; • Performs various related essential duties as required. MARGINAL FUNCTIONS • May perform various clerical duties, including filing and copying; • Arranges equipment and facilities for activities; • Picks up and delivers various supplies; • Arranges for part-time staff and volunteers for assistance in programs; • Performs basic housekeeping before, during and after activities. 3 MINIMUM TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE High School diploma or equivalent; 2 years of experience in recreation, leisure services, parks and/or community service delivery, preferably in a public or not -for - profit setting; basic computer skills including word processing; or any equivalent combination of training and experience which provides the required skills, knowledge and abilities. Required Licenses and Certification Requires possession of, or ability to acquire, a valid Class C California Drivers License; Must obtain First Aid and CPR certification prior to completion of 6-month probation. KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES REQUIRED TO PERFORM ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS Knowledge of. - basic philosophy, objectives and requirements of marketing, community service, recreational and cultural activities; • the needs, interests and requirements of the community; • available local agencies, organizations and providers of public service resources. Physical Requirements: • Ability to operate a variety of tools, equipment and vehicles, including personal computer, copier, and fax; • Ability to coordinate eyes, hands and fingers in performing skilled tasks including word processing and driving; • Ability to exert light to moderate physical effort involving sitting most of the time, but periodically involves walking or moving from one area to another and carrying supplies for setting up events. Supervisorial Responsibilities: • Ability to assign, review, plan, coordinate and guide the work of other employees; • Ability to promote staff development and motivation; • Ability to analyze problems that arise in the areas under supervision and recommend solutions. Mathematical Ability: • Ability to compute and use fractions and decimals. Judgment and Situational Reasoning Ability: • Ability to apply common sense understanding in work processing; • Ability to apply principles of influence systems, i.e. supervision; • Ability to use independent judgment in regularly routine situations, such as assessing and addressing needs of the community. Language Ability and Interpersonal Communication: • Ability to comprehend and correctly use a variety of informational documents including time sheets, calendars and schedules; • Ability to prepare letters, records, publicity releases and calendars of activities and events using prescribed format and conforming to all rules of punctuation, grammar, diction and style; • Ability to comprehend a variety of reference books and manuals including contracts, attendance sheets, computer manual and information and reference materials; • Ability to communicate and maintain effective working relationships with residents, co-workers, volunteers, community services agencies, supervisor, and suppliers verbally and in writing. Environmental Adaptability: • Ability to work in an office and recreation center environment; • Ability to work in an outdoor setting, subject to inclement weather conditions. The City of La Quinta is an Equal Opportunity Employer. In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, La Quinta will provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities and encourages both prospective employees and incumbents to discuss potential accommodations with the employer. August 2004 .1 1-) 5 1 :.. COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Approval to Award a Contract to Sierra Landscape, Inc., to Construct the Highway 1 1 1 Landscape Modifications at La Quinta Court , Project No. 2004-01 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: /0- STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a contract in the amount of $75,740 to Sierra Landscape, Inc. to construct the Highway 111 Landscape Modifications at La Quinta Court, Project No. 2004-01. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The following represents the approved project funding source: Art in Public Places (APP) Fund $135,900.00 Based upon the low bid in the amount of $75,740, the following represents the anticipated project budget: Construction: Inspection/Test/Survey: Administration: Professional: Contingency (10%): Total: CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. $ 7 5, 740.00 $9,000.00 $ 5, 300.00 $ 5,000.00 $40,860.00 $135,900.00 S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\C 14 HWY 1 11.doc BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the December 17, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to review the landscaping around the La Quinta Court artwork, on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Highway 1 1 1 . On April 15, 2003, the City Council authorized staff to solicit quotes for the design portion of the modifications to the La Quinta Court artwork and authorized the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with a landscape architect in an amount not to exceed $10,000. On May 29, 2003, the City entered into an Agreement with Ray Lopez Associates to provide two concepts for modifications to the landscape portion of the La Quinta Court artwork. At the July 10, 2003 meeting, the Cultural Arts Commission reviewed and recommended Concept 1 with slight modifications to incorporate the dry well bed and meandering sidewalk from Concept 2. Concept 3 was provided for City Council consideration at the August 5, 2003 City Council meeting. City Council's direction was to reduce the number of plants in the landscape area, consider adding tile to the fountain, provide an interesting walkway with some type of pavement amenity such as pavers, stamped concrete or aggregate to be continued to the median island or "pork chop" area, within the State right-of-way. As a condition of the La Quinta Court project, the developer is required to complete landscape improvements for the median island. Currently, the location is designed to contain decomposed granite with a sidewalk through the middle with small boulders in the decomposed granite on either side. Although not included in the original scope of work, the Cultural Arts Commission also requested that either landscaping or some type of hardscape be added to the median island at this location; however, there is . no irrigation to this location. Planting material in this area would not be possible without extending irrigation into the State right-of-way. Any changes to the median island design would therefore require Caltrans approval. On August 19, 2003, the City Council approved the conceptual design for the La Quinta Court project and directed staff to proceed with the median island improvements area as a separate project. On June 15, 2004, the City Council appropriated $135,900 from the City's Art in Public Places Fund, approved the project plans, specifications, and engineer's 2 4 f-) S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\C 14 HWY 1 11.doc -1 ' estimate and authorized staff to advertise the Highway 111 Landscape Modifications Adjacent to LG's Steakhouse, Project No. 2004-01. On August 5, 2004, two sealed bids were received for the construction of this project. Sierra Landscape, Inc. of Palm Desert submitted the lowest responsive bid in the amount of $75,740.00, which is 28.5% below the Engineer's Estimate. The following represents the project schedule: City Council Award of Contract August 17, 2004 Execute Contracts and Mobilize August 18 - 31, 2004 Construction (45 Consecutive Calendar Days) September 7 - October 21, 2004 Project Close-out/Acceptance November 2004 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a contract in the amount of $75,740 to Sierra Landscape, Inc. to construct the Highway 111 Landscape Modifications at La Quinta Court, Project No. 2004-01; or 2. Do not approve a contract in the amount of $75,740 to Sierra Landscape, Inc. to construct the Highway 111 Landscape Modifications at La Quinta Court, Project No. 2004-01; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, T' othy R. J as o , P.E. Public Wor irec or/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Bid Summary S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\C 14 HWY 11 1.doc 3 ATTACHMENT 1 Highway 111 Landscape Modifications Adjacent to LG's Steakhouse Project Number 2004-01 Bid Comparison Summary ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 1 Mobilization 1 LS $10 000.00 $10 000.00 2 IDemolition Clear and Grub 1 LS $7 968.00 $7 968.00 3 PCC Sidewalk 2 200 SF $3.00 $6 600.00 4 Epoxy Aggregate Resurfacing 2200 SF $10.80 $23 760.00 5 Fine Grading 8,300 SF $0.12 $996.00 6 amaerops RUMMT-75 Gallon Mediterranean Fan Palm 5 EA $132.00 $660.00 7 15 Gallon Shrubs 4 EA $90.00 $360.00 8 5 Gallon Shrubs 125 EA $42.00 $5 250.00 9 Golden Barrel Cactus 18 EA $54.00 $972.00 10 "Desert Gold Fines" 5 000 SF $0.66 $3 300.00 11 Shot Rock - Baja Cresta Stone 4" to 8" diameter, laminated for wetted look 950 SF $12.00 $11 400.00 12 3' Diameter Boulders -1/3 Buried 10 EA $270.00 $2 700.00 13 4' Diameter Bolders - 1/3 Buried 16 EA $390.00 $6 240.00 14 5' Diameter Boulders - Install per specifications and details 1 31 EA $540.00 $.1 620.00 15 -Irrigation System 1 11 LS $18,426.001 $18 426.00 TOTAL: $100,252.00 SIERRA LANDSCAPE $15 000.00 $15 000.00 $6, 500.00 $6 500.00 $6.00 $13 200.00 $7.00 $15 400.00 $0.20 $1660.00 $100.00 $500.00 $100.00 $400.00 $18.00 $2,250.00 $80.00 $1,440.00 $0.60 $3,000.00 $3.40 $3 230.00 $180.00 $1 800.00 $260.00 $4160.00 $400.00 $1 200.00 $6 000.00 $6 000.00 $75,740.00 One additional contractor submitted a bid proposal. However the bid was declared "Non responsive" due to the contractor's failure to acknowledge Addendum No. 2. 4 1 4. rsC� 9wg OF 'T COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Community Safety Manager to Attend "Emergency Management -Earthquake Course" given by the California Specialized Training Institute, located in San Luis Obispo, CA, September 12-17, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager to Attend "Emergency Management -Earthquake Course" given by the California Specialized Training Institute, located in San Luis Obispo, CA, September 12-17, 2004. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The training will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-5056- 425.51-01. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: ■ Registration $450 ■ Meals 375 ■ Travel 150 ■ Hotel 445 Total $1,420 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This course is designed to assist in preparedness planning to identify key components and techniques to develop a coordinated and comprehensive multi -disciplinary response in case of an earthquake. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager to attend the "Emergency Management -Earthquake Course" given by the California Specialized Training Institute, located in San Luis Obispo, CA, September 12- 17, 2004; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, T m qtung, Building & Safety Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment:1. Announcement 2 4i •. so STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES O E S �. CALIVoixz* California Specialized Training Institute P.O. Box 8123 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8123 Phone: (805) 549-3536ri . Fax: (805) 549-3348 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT -EARTHQUAKE COURSE (E1-04) September 13-17, 2004 Thank you for applying to CSTI's Earthquake course. This course is designed to help those assigned with earthquake preparedness planning responsibility to identify key components and techniques to develop a coordinated and comprehensive multi -disciplinary disaster response. It is an intense course requiring committed participant involvement, including evening work sessions. We hope this will be a rewarding training experience for you. The course will be held at CSTI (Ames Hall - Bldg. 901 - Classroom #1), in San Luis Obispo, California. A map to the training location is enclosed. Should you have any questions after reviewing this letter, please contact the Peg Ryan, Registrar at (805) 549-3536 for administration, or the Course Manager Joe Costello at (805) 549-3553 for course content. If you are unable to attend this course please contact the Peg Ryan immediately so that standby applicants can be notified. We also ask that you inform C.S.T.I. of any participant name changes that will require a, new application form. IMPORTANTRI Camp San Luis Obispo is a California National Guard facility, subject to Department of Defense security requirements, including random vehicle searches inbound and outbound. You must bring a photo ED (preferably a current driver's license), current vehicle registration, and up-to-date proof of vehicle insurance to gain access into Camp San Luis Obispo! (If you have recently renewed your license, registration or insurance, please bring your receipt; it will greatly expedite your entrance to the Camp). Please fill out the attached "parking permit" and have it ready before coming to the base. If you do not have these items with you, then you will not be allowed into the Camp to attend the class! If you experience any problems with access to the Camp, please contact the Chief of CSLO Security at (8050 594-6364 or the CSTI main number between 7:30 am and 5:00 pm at (805) 549-3535. Lodging: CSTI has blocked rooms for participants at The Cliffs Resort Hotel (see enclosed map) from Sunday, September 12 ,through Friday morning, September 17th. The Cliffs Resort Hotel Single/Double $ 81.00 + 10% Tax 2757 Shell Beach Road Shell Beach, California 93449 (805) 773-5000 Website: www.cUffsresort.com dollA*rma.4;on If- t0234g You must confirm this reservation directly with the hotel by August 29, 2004. When making reservations identify yourself as a student of the California Specialized Training Institute and the course you are attending. You may select a different hotel, but if you choose to stay at the Cliffs you must confirm this reservation yourself. If you require a double room or any other special arrangements, please contact the hotel directly. Failure to confirm the room may result in your inability to stay at the hotel and/or receive the stated rate. If you prefer other accommodations, attached is a list of hotels that will offer rooms and rates to CSTI students on an as -available basis. Due 'to the team -oriented nature of your class, and the workshop requirements, it is recommended but not required that you stay at the Cliffs Resort Hotel. Sunday Orientation Session: There is a 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM orientation session on Sunday evening, September 12th at the hotel. While not mandatory, course participants are encouraged to meet the course manager during this period. An orientation packet for the exercise will be provided and background information for the Role Playing assignments will be handed out. Information about appropriate placement within the role-playing assignment will also be discussed. Students are strongly invited to attend this orientation session at some time during the time provided. Registration: Will be held on Monday between 7:15 AM and 8:00 AM at Ames Hall Bldg. 901, Camp San Luis Obispo (see attached map). Tuition Rate & Policy: $450.00 Tuition payment is due no later than two weeks prior -to the start of the course. Late registration will be considered on a case -by -case basis, depending on space availability. CSTI accepts checks, money orders, and credit cards (Visa, Mastercard or American Express and ATM cards with either Visa or Master Money/Mastercard logos). Please make checks payable to: STATE OF CALIFORNIA-OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. Purchase Orders Are Not Accepted. Tuition, meals fee, and hotel payment are entirely separate, a combined check cannot be accepted. Continued on other side Mail payment to CSTI, P.O. Box 8123, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8123. CSTI's Federal Tax lD#: 94-6001347. FAX No: (805) 544-7103. For additional information and/or credit card payment please contact CSTI Administration at (805) 549- 3599 or email: Christine_Low@oes.ca.gov. Meals: A fee of $52.60 will be collected from each participant at registration to cover the cost of lunch, snack, and beverage services Monday through Thursday and Friday 1/2 day. OES has entered into a contract with Phoenix Foodservices to accommodate the need for meal service within the tight schedule of the course and the .long distance to other adequate food service providers. During the week every meal is served with a soup and salad bar at least one deli sandwich bar and at least one hot lunch entree during the week, vegetable, starch, bread, a selection of desserts and a choice of beverages. Participants with special dietary needs or other caterer concerns should advise the Institute Contract Manager, Jeanine Gentis at (805) 549- 3531 at least 5 days prior to registration. Please be prepared to pay in cash or check payable to "Phoenix Foodservices" at registration. Your cooperation is appreciated and allows us to focus on providing the best training, programs possible. (ADDRESS: Phoenix Foodservices, 920 Cyclamen Court, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, Phone Number (805) 544-4889, Federal Tax I.D. #: 77-0007841. The Cliff s at Shell Beach provides complimentary cooked to order breakfast. PLEASE NOTE. Payments for TUITION, MEALS FEE, and HOTEL are entirely separate. A combined check cannot be accepted Law Enforcement Personnel: POST .Plan M. The POST tuition reimbursement rate is $250.00 of CSTI's tuition of, $450.00. The POST control number is 9560-40220-04001. University of California Credit: This course is approved by the University of California at Santa Barbara for post- graduate, professional credit through UCSB Extension. These professional credits are recognized by employers for promotional purposes and professional advancement, by state licensing agencies for renewal, and by professional associations for certification. This type of credit is not recognized - by the University of California for transfer _ to either graduate or undergraduate degree programs, but maybe accepted for transfer to degree programs at other colleges or universities subject to their approval. The degree -granting institution should be contacted for information. Credit students earn a letter grade and four quarter units, providing they meet the instructor's criteria for passing the course. Credit students must successfully pass a written examination required by the University and pay tuition of $100. Payment is accepted using Mastercard, Visa, or a check payable to "Regents of UC" (cash is not accepted). The exam is given immediately after the course ends. Additional information on the exam will be provided by the Course Manager. Cancellations: If for any reason, you are unable to attend, please notify the Registrar immediately at (805) 549-3536. We do have a standby list, and notification of your cancellation will allow others to attend. If you cancel less than 30 days prior to the start of the course, a refund less $40.00 processing fee will be issued. If you do not notify CSTI, the full tuition may be charged. Refunds will be determined on a case -by -case basis. Partial tuition refunds for those who fail to complete the course can not be issued. Transportation: C.S.T.I. is roughly 10-15 miles away from all hotel accommodations. Each participant is responsible for his/her own transportation arrangements and costs. San Luis Obispo County Airport is served by American Eagle and United Express. Amtrak also serves San Luis Obispo County. Car rental agencies with offices at the airport include Hertz (805) 543- 8843, Avis (805) 544-0630, Budget (805) 541-2722, and Thrifty (805) 544-3777. Student Attire: We recommend casual civilian attire; however due to frequent weather extremes, -a set of warm cloth ag_ s __.. strongly recommended. Please bring a jacket or sweater to wear in the classroom. Attendance Policy: CSTI recognizes that participants in its programs are professionals with many responsibilities and time constraints. Programs are scheduled to present the maximum amount of information in the shortest possible time. It is important that participants attend the entire training program; credit for completion cannot be granted if more than 10% of the program is missed. Emergency Contact: (805) 549-3536 or (805) 549-3535. Non -emergency messages will be distributed to the student's mailbox for pick-up at their next break; students will be contacted during class sessions for emergency calls only. Students may be contacted after class at the hotel at (805) 773-5000. Miscellaneous: If you have a disability that should be considered when making seating .or room assignments, please notify CSTI in advance of the course. CSTI adheres to a "Non -attribution Policy," which allows participants to speak freely in a closed class session. Therefore, cameras and recording devices are not permitted. This course will end Friday approximately at 12: 00 pm. i )0 4 �.Qum& ;• ti5 G� OF 'T9 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Request by Riverside County Registrar of Voters to Utilize the Council Chambers for Training of Election Officers for the November Presidential Election on Monday, October 18, 2004, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a request from the Riverside County Registrar of Voters to utilize the Council chambers for training of election officers for the November Presidential election on Monday, October 18, 2004, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Riverside County Registrar of Voters has requested that the Council Chambers be made available for training of election officers for the November Presidential election. The request meets all the requirements of the facility use policy as contained in the City's Guidelines. A complete application has been submitted (Attachment 1) for the City Council's consideration. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a request from the Riverside County Registrar of Voters to utilize the Council chambers for training of election officers for the November Presidential election on Monday, October 18, 2004, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; or 2. Do not approve the request from the Riverside County Registrar of Voters; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tim H krung, Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas- P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Application Pq , ATTACHMENT 1 Organi-cetjp%w COUNTY OF RIVERSIDL REGISTRAR OF VOTERS Pexoon(a) In, Charges, ART. TINOCO ,.. Phone:_ (951)-486-7310 Addreeet� 2% 4 GATEWAY DRIVE ,RIVERSIDE, CA 32507 .Facility Requested, CITY OF LA QUINU COUNC [L CHAFERS Type of xvemib: Public XXX private , Difidr3,ptiou of Act:4vi ty f.,.' ELECTION OFFICER TRAINING FOR THE UrCOMING nER 2004 PRESIDENTIAL'14LECTION. NEED SEATINFOR FROPLN. �4 , Pate(N) of Upor 10/18/04 Size of Group: 50 Time of t7aM r: 8tert (a,�a rp,m.) 9:00 Art 5 Totei fours of use 8 x $32,00 /hdwd w A 'NA Certif icat• of AdditiQngl 1ABUrad AttaghecR, HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT "'or - city Inaurm=00 Regv.es ted $ r4ke peid a NIA 2efundable Cir#ninQ Daposit Paid: S60mion Ucxm w $200 CoUhcll C'bOro (up to 53 paapie) $300 comail (54 VeVZa plux) $500 , Total Paidr 5 N/A The underaigned hereby agaceem t rules r Wdlationg Of the city ©f Da Quinta ref. cilities. t t e: ELECTIONS COORnIN R"S ASSISTANT Dipoait.RequLred For: NA DOPoait getumed; 'pates K/A �01•�� �• P■MN►w •i/r�1� t1. yk,�J,.aax+y, ..a a1.ti •e�OeMwi w= �a���■bi•w �w1■b h+r �a wt�is�1► •� /M1 . •p•a++rlay orp•�,■■tiPa- X� to lOM98 14 ROG an 61Lie.r at %kG waVanigaei•,w !or vMab.p�iXj,�1►1lia i■ iwi�� k�/�� NNA11 p#er•wt w■itb.11 ,aYbMrillibibw from bhe Omar to mdoa. 3 i 12, 0 Ta CV 414t 4 Sep aums COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEMTITLE: Approval to Appropriate Additional Funding for Traffic Signal Coordination on Washington Street in Connection with Project No. 2004-02 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 13 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve an appropriation of funds in the amount of $33,100.00 from Gas Tax state revenues (Account No. 201-0000-290-0000) to Project No. 2004-02, for traffic signal coordination on Washington Street; and Approve Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $24,917.58; and Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $8,050.00. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Contract Change Order No. 1 ($24,917.58) is eligible for gas tax funding because it provides compensation to the contractor to furnish and install a new Econolite signal controller mechanism at the intersection of Miles Avenue and Washington Street. The previously installed controller was outdated and of a different make which made it incompatible with the other controllers in the Washington Street synchronized signal corridor. The new controller will allow for the continuation of signal synchronization on Washington Street within the cities of Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and La Quinta. The City of Indian Wells is obligated to reimburse La Quinta for 50% of this cost. Contract Change Order No. 2 ($8,050.00) is also eligible for gas tax funding because it provides for the replacement of existing damaged or non-functioning signal detector loops located at the signalized intersections of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, Desert Club Drive and Calle Tampico, and Park Avenue and Avenue 50. Adequate funding is available within the City's Gas Tax state revenues (Account no. 201-0000-290-0000) to support this appropriation. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\8-17-04\C 15 2004-02.doc BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The citywide traffic signal lamp retrofit, Project No. 2004-02, is included within the Public Works/Engineering Department Operational Budget for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 and was shown as a significant project in the preliminary budget approved by City Council on June 13, 2003. This project began on July 19, 2004 and is approximately 80% complete. Contract Change Order No. 1 will allow for the removal and replacement of the existing outdated, incompatible make and model signal controller device located at the intersection of Miles Avenue and Washington Street. The installation of this new controller is necessary to maintain synchronized continuity of traffic signals along the Washington Street corridor. Currently, with the exception of Miles Avenue, signals along this primary arterial corridor are synchronized from both directions (northbound and southbound) up to Highway 1 1 1 to allow for a more efficient movement of traffic. Staff recommends approving this contract change order under this contract because 1) time is of the essence to improve traffic congestion, 21 this type of work is specialized and this contractor has the necessary qualifications to perform this work, and 3) due to the relatively small dollar value of the specified scope of work, it is not economically feasible to bid this work as a "stand alone" project. Contract Change Order No. 2 will allow for the replacement of signal loop detectors at Miles Avenue and Washington Street, Park Avenue and Avenue 50, and Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. This work is specialized but is not of sufficient value to be economically feasible to bid as a "stand alone" project. Timing is also an important aspect of this scope of work since the City will be awarding a contract in the near future for the Citywide Slurry Seal and Striping project on these streets. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve an appropriation of funds in the amount of $33,100.00 from Gas Tax state revenues (Account No. 201-0000-290-0000) to Project No. 2004-02, City Wide Traffic Signal Lamp LED Retrofit, approve Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $24,917.58, and approve Contract Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $8,050.00; or 2. Do not approve an appropriation of funds in the amount of $33,100.00 from Gas Tax state revenues (Account No. 201-0000-290-0000) to Project No. 2004-02, City Wide Traffic Signal Lamp LED Retrofit, do not approve Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $24,917.58, and do not approve Contract Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $8,050.00; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 2 `s S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\8-17-04\C 15 2004-02.doc Respectfully submitted, T mothy R. o sso . E. Public Work irec /City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Contract Change Order No. 1 2. Contract Change Order No. 2 3 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2004\08-17-04\C 15 2004-02.doc CONTRACTt ' CIW oils QWAta PROJECT Two Slpd LO Lwap Retrofit CONTRACTOR: RcpWAW F ctri�c 71M good Xlvc NOT0% Ca. 9490 4114 NO. 2004.02 CONTRACT CHMG$ ORWR NO. RwA�Rtt�#ttAMt#iti+R#tf14t►�At�RtiiM4lNe�Arwr►###�tiAA**iiiA4t ti�A #AA#ii##i###i#NNfii#t+iit�• 10 d10 �0[Ola Of tale LCoB04A/hem avyw ire busby dkvdW to Oaks dw A**k 4000d ordo d~e "Ming d� drrofkifotio dsd bd� pisas ad Ipeci8cadan ktbis CQotraA UNk m Wwii ae strtod W wwk WWI omftm to tba te11M ' R'�Ai!#*it##*i.����ri�ri�lAdeA4tif�R�rititf##t►ri�ti*iit##*4*#A44*t*ii�ttRA*tit!#ir4itiii*tt Y orda' 4m Ir the mnovw of the Whft 'f aac 8iPW Cabinet and Cow Wia aid ft 1tWWjm of a mw CON"I i dUm fi«ii*i�ttAltifiiAi#t#tt*�rfAi#1tf��*w*ii#itit##tiiti#A�*#11�4A�M#*ttiit#�R**�A*I�NRii#tAi#i#*Atit *mNomts �Oq� Of�:t� d�IOO�'WRip�iOa /�1 �0 N�jlllt�04 �DOOId�y b �p�p�p�,CU1��ddjtlaMl tlAle *1' �j �fld aboY�l tiwgiospd kio L TM rwbW teat eow dw am IN �R ► AW inI ft e of HML �►•!Nt*#*itiAf##tt��AiRANi#+M�M�►AA�A�#tYAti#*#*## #if###tifrN#tAA#it�Ati#A#A#AA#t#tt�ki###iiAA#A# . Deaes . Ott#�R�►�didii�i�r�kbtkt4i�rtttt�i•�1lAtQRfAAiAt►w�4A#*#ii#*A 4A A#itttifi# fit,. �/ ��� �AwtsiMe �wW a/s�rM� NMit ��#���� tkttlrtiA A Ao#tt#fiver# *tti4� profile �p�J w4a �� �'+� �atittp+gpard ttcp�nore,� thattre wNl *OWN 1 W bs n"dabom, aed ptrfq Rllier yue Crary ro go4M ow @bow �' !�J PaD*KNt the mm" 86mg dbOM Wkkk lnchkrhs all Arw and t+W&W, owrkWmWFm l*r � A-►• wM1M1�11�ar�r�1 cONTRACT: ATTACHMENT 2 QW,w C4lot L4 Tm &4144 LED I.uMp Rtftpt Pam' 140.20442 COriTUC"i`ORs NWS Ca, 9490 41)4 �t, ##+► rr*rt*err*#,��� 4 CONTRACT C MGF ORDFA NO. pumms ##4ttti#riii#ttorra#ia►#ti#r#f#ti#tf#tttfi oflfirCon�ctP% Owe 04 basb►dkcftdnkto � son" P focdo dw a ►� mod all work "U"Oform to �#r�r`�r+�#riw��#�►#�►,�,��rM*r�t,w��*wss+►���ri���r�++���.�*�� dw mmat #i*i*tiiritA�RA►RA*it#RiAf#ii Otdert0orra fordw iol411atioa OfT�lfic $• o b" 10 repioca'M Loops ih dim p) diced locom: Lo t SOoat& Mika Ave. = II I "W 0 3S0 gyp. »tine CWtk Tsopioo 10 1cAv�. Adv I,,oap a Avr. $0 =1 LOOP® $0 e& 10061. �mow= � udw , *wmfr+�#�oar►�o#�#� *rt* avnww -ago[ tdo'dduj" stare for ot4min , aw t►tt#** irr+r*,� i�rri��r �►+�t�r 0 r�it *�r�o� ,�* lading Wo of Meru' l�boltt� gv: Taw s 31=.00 r«si L—WA TOW $810SOM APP "( d „act t###t�#t#*w�#�ktlt##i##ii�#iir�4#A##tltkltAll�tt*ttrii A#i!#* 4 PWAW am tMa�kiy aa0ryprJ►w �Itlr•":►�e �ohdabow. ooad) °1P drortrr wIJ1 Ir4 miown add .,�Aich tKclNdp a!! d f0 a'"r0/ m #At abowr. ��'Secatc�aao+�r.�.o�c�„�tx,x-ra�rcn�a oor 5 V Sep ti OF T� COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Supplemental Agreement with Riverside County for the Use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Construction of Parking Lot Improvements on Avenida Bermudas, and Public Service Funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the Supplemental Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement to utilize the sum of $210,355 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for construction of parking lot improvements on Avenida Bermudas ($180,355), and public service funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The City will receive reimbursement of $210,355 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for the construction of parking lot improvements on Avenida Bermudas ($180,355), and public service funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The purpose of this Supplemental Agreement (Attachment 1) between the City and Riverside County is to authorize the use of CDBG funds for FY 2004-2005 in the amount of $210,355 in accordance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. This allocation reflects a proportional share of Riverside County's entitlement allocation from H.U.D. The City submitted CDBG applications to the County for the projects in January, 2004; the applications were subsequently approved by the Board of Supervisors. This Supplemental Agreement is for projects which have been approved by the City Council on January 20, 2004 under Resolution 2004-016 and are available with the beginning of the new Federal Fiscal Year which begins October 1, 2004. Monies become available for reimbursement to the City upon approval of this Agreement by the City and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. For the past twenty years, the City of La Quinta has been participating in the Urban Counties CDBG program with Riverside County. Entitlement Funds for CDBG Program have been expended for projects such as: Senior Center construction, La Fonda Street construction and public service funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit. The City has previously entered into Supplemental Agreements with the County for the use of CDBG funds. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the Supplemental Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement to utilize the sum of $210,355 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for the construction of parking lot improvements on Avenida Bermudas ($180,355) and public service funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000); or 2. Do not Approve the Supplemental Agreement and do not authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement to utilize the sum of $210,355 in CDBG Entitlement Funds for the construction of parking lot improvements on Avenida Bermudas ($180,355), and public service funds for the Boys and Girls Club - La Quinta Unit ($30,000); or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, car Orci, Interim Community Development Director Approved for Submission by: Irl-e- jeood���� • Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Supplemental Agreement K `.40 1 2 3 4 5f 6' 7I s1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 File: 4.LQ023, 4.LQ033 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein called, "COUNTY," and the CITY OF LA QUINTA, herein called "CITY," mutually agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation Agreement dated July 2, 2002, whereby CITY elected to participate with COUNTY, which has qualified as an "Urban County" for purposes of receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and to assist and undertake essential community development and housing assistance activities pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Act". Said Cooperation Agreement dated July 2, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement as if each and every provision was set forth herein. 2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist with the community development activities, within its jurisdiction, by utilizing the sum of $210,355, CDBG Entitlement Funds, as specifically identified in Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and consist of 3 pages (each), and by this reference are incorporated herein, for the projects: 4 LQ023 Facility Improvements within RD Pd Area 1, $180,355. 1 4 LQ033 Boys &Girls Club Fee Waiver Program, $30,000. CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through its Economic Development Agency, of the project plans and specifications prior to CITY's construction of same when a project consists of a construction activity. 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement for the projects shall be for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005, and proceed consistent with the completion schedule set forth in Exhibits A and B. In the event that the projects are not substantially completed by the time set forth in the completion schedule due to unforeseen or uncontrollable causes, the schedule for the completion of the project may be extended by the period of the enforced delay. Times of performance may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of CITY and COUNTY. If 1113 a { 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 substantial progress toward completion in conformance with the completion schedule, as determined by COUNTY of the projects are not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this agreement by the procedures set forth in the Section titled "Termination", of this agreement and the entitlement funds associated with the projects may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate notice is given. 4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shall determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the provisions of Paragraphs 2 and 3. of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic Development Agency, shall: (1) Make payment of the grant funds to CITY as designated in Exhibits A and B; (2) It is the CITY's responsibility to monitor the projects activity of Exhibits A and B to ensure compliance with applicable federal regulations and the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall comply with timely drawdown of funds by submitting monthly requests for reimbursement. All disbursements of grant funds will be on a reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the CITY has submitted its letter identifying payments and documentation which supports expenditures. All authorized obligations incurred in the performance of the Agreement must be reported by June 4, 2004 for projects eligible under 570.201(e), Public Services; 3) The COUNTY will directly manage and monitor projects identified in Exhibits A and B. These projects have been determined to be Countywide, receiving grant funding from multiple sources; therefore, these projects will be managed and monitored by the COUNTY. 5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate with COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and public assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in carrying out its Strategic Plan of the Consolidated Plan and other requirements of the Community Development Block Grant Program. 6. LEAD AGENCY FOR. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15051(d) of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, CITY is designated as the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of this Agreement. 7. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply with all applicable 114 r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 laws, rules and regulations, and shall indemnify, save and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency members and their respective agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liabilities, claims, debt, damages, demands, suits, actions and causes of action of whatsoever kind, nature or sort including, but not by way of limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense of said parties, and the payment of attorney's fees, arising out of or in any manner connected with the performance by CITY under this Agreement. 8. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS. a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 and Part 85 and OMB Circular A-87 as applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal funds under this Agreement. b. CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG Entitlement funds received as set forth in Exhibits (A and B). c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make available to COUNTY and to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for examination and copying all of its records and other materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement. d. CITY shall not retain any program income as defined in Section 570.500 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations. Said program income shall be used only for the activities that are the subject of this Agreement. Further, all provisions of this Agreement shall apply to such activities. e. The CITY shall ensure projects that are serving limited clientele (570.208(a)(2)(i), 1 that at least fifty-one percent (51 %) of the persons benefiting from the CDBG funded activities are of i I low and moderate income and meet the program income guidelines attached as Exhibits (A and B). I The CITY must provide the direct benefit documentation required. 9. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. CITY shall comply with the provisions of the Act and any amendments thereto and the federal regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations found in Part85 and Part 570 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. CITY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the Community Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and cited in the above -mentioned Cooperation Agreement. City A e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to comply with Section 3 of the Housing & Urban Development Act of 1968: as amended attached hereto as Exhibit "S". 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants and employees shall act at all times in an independent capacity during the term of this Agreement, and shall not act as, shall not be, nor shall they in any manner be construed to be agents, officers or employees of the COUNTY. 11. TERMINATION. a. CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement except upon express written consent I of COUNTY. b. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 11 a, COUNTY may 1 suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason I for such action: (1) In the event CITY fails to perform the covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as provided in this Agreement; and (2) In the event there is a conflict with any federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule rendering any of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or untenable; or (3) In the event the funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable. c. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees to return any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY. In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause of action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement. d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not to incur any additional cost with regard to the projects that are cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions. 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections 570.601 and 570.602 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations which requires that no person in the United States shall on the .grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Community Development funds. 13. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with the CDBG regulations prohibiting conflicts of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by this reference incorporated herein. b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers, and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with Section A-11 of the County's CDBG Policy manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by this reference incorporated herein. c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR 570.611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors listed in 24 CFR 570.611 (e). d. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY shall provide COUNTY with a list of all employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials who are in a position to participate in a decision making process, exercise any functions or responsibilities, or gain inside information with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly disclose to COUNTY any potential conflict, including even the appearance of conflict, that may arise with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement. e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall be immediately terminated by the COUNTY. 14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY shall bear no liability for any later determination by the United States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban Development or any other person or entity that CITY is or is not eligible under 24 CFR Part 570 to receive CDBG funds. 15. USE OF PROPERTY. Whenever federal CDBG funds or program income are used, in whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment or personal property, the property shall not be transferred from its originally funded use for a period of five (5) years from the date that the City is no longer a part of the urban COUNTY program. The CITY shall maintain an inventory for COUNTY 1 . e I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I review. 16. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE. CAUSED BY PROJECT. CITY agrees to notify and to require any lessee or assignee to notify Riverside County Workforce Development Center/JTPA and GAIN - Department of Public Social Services of any and all job openings that are caused by this project. 17. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the project funded pursuant to this Agreement, during the term of this Agreement, will make reference to the Contribution of the County of Riverside Community Development Block Grant Program in making the project possible. 18. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION. CITY shall be monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely compliance with the provisions of this Agreement and the effective and efficient achievement of the Program Objectives. Quarterly reports shall be due on the last day of the month immediately following the end of the quarter being reported. The quarterly written reports shall include, but shall not be limited to the following data elements: a. Title of program, listing of components, description of activities/operations. b. The projected goals, indicated numerically, and also the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered in meeting goals. c. If CDBG funded Activity meets National Objective under 24 CFR 570.208 (aX2)(i), SPONSOR shall report the following:. 1) Total number of direct beneficiaries (clientele served) who are: • Moderate income • Low income • Very -low income 2) Percent of the Low/Moderate income beneficiaries 3) Racial ethnicity of clientele 4) Number of Female Headed Households SPONSOR shall report beneficiary statistics monthly to EDA on the pre -approved Direct Benefit Form, and Self -Certification Form (certifying income, family size, and racial ethnicity) as JL required by HUD. Updated forms are to be provided to said SPONSOR by EDA should HUD implement changes during the term of this agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this Agreement together- with the cooperation Agreement between the parties, embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation to the subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between the parties at the time of execution. 20. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Executive Director of the COUNTY's Economic Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are authorized to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or appropriate to implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Agreement as it may be amended from time to time by COUNTY. // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // I/ 21. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowered representative of COUNTY and CITY respectively. I DATED: ATTEST: Nancy Romero Clerk of the Board By: Deputy (Seal) DATED: ATTEST: SH:MT:amj S.\CDBGWTTi�LQ\SUPPAGR04.023,033.doc COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Bv: Chairman, Board of Supervisors CITY OF LA QUINTA By: Mayor JL J • r EXH BIT A Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Sponsor: City of La Quinta Address: PO Box 1504, La Quinta, CA 92253 Project Title: Facility Improvements/RD Prj Area 1 Location: City of La Quinta FILE: 4.LQ023 Description: CDBG funds will be used to construct a parking lot on .97 acres of Redevelopment Agency owned land in the La Quinta Village area. The project will provide additional parking and safer access. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 180,355.00 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $180,355.00 1 ,,� -111 :� EXHIBIT A Page 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone (Public Facilities) Prepare Plans & Specifications Bid Documents & Review Bid Advertisement, Bid Review & Award Construction Notice of Completion Start Date FILE: 4.LQ023 Completion Date July 1, 2004 December 2004 March 2005 November 1, 2004 February 2005 May 2005 June 2005 ��� 12 EXHIBIT A Page 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY FROM TO July 12 2004 June 30, 2005 FILE: 4.LQ023 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-02-UC-06-0506 4. X Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Facility Improvement/RD 4.LQ023 Categorically Exempt Project Area 1 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER City of La Quinta 760/770-7000 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CDBG funds will be used to construct a parking lot on .97 acres of Redevelopment Agency owned land in the La Quinta Village area. The project will provide additional parking and safer access. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(c) BENEFIT: Slum Blight Area 11. CENSUS TRACTS)/ENUMERATION DISTRICTS) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Provide adequate and safe parking for the La Quinta Village redevelopment area. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Public Facility $180,355.00 14. Totals $180,355.00 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $180,355.00 13 iJ Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 4.LQ033 Sponsor: City of La Quinta Address: PO Box 1504, La Quinta, CA 92253 Project Title: Boys & Girls Club Fee Waiver Program Location: B&G Club -La .Quints Unit, 49-995 Park Ave., La Quinta, CA Description: CDBG funds will be used to provide financial assistance through the fee -waiver program that will allow more low- and moderate income children in the community to attend and participate in the. numerous programs offered by the Boys & Girls Club. Project Budget: Cost CDBG AMproved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 30,000.00 10) Contingency TOTAL $30,000.00 a EXHIBIT B Page 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone (Public Service) Program Services Submit Quarterly Report (in accordance to section 26 of Sponsor's Agreement) Semi -Annual Monitoring Site Visit Submit Final Claim for Reimbursement Program Services Complete FILE: 4.LQ033 Start Date Completion Date July 1, 2004 December 3, 2004 October 31, 2004 January 31, 2005 April 30, 2005 July 31, 2005 May 15, 2005 June 3.0 , 2005 15 lv EXHIBIT B Page 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY FROM TO July 1, 2004 June 30, 2005 FILE: 4.LQ033 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-02-UC-06-0506 4. X Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Boys & Girls Club 4.LQ033 Categorical Exemption Fee Waiver Program 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER City of La Quinta 760/770-7000 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CDBG funds will be used to provide financial assistance through the fee -waiver program that will allow more low- and moderate income children in the community to attend and participate in the numerous programs offered by the Boys & Girls Club. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(e) BENEFIT: Low Mod Clientele Income Certification 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICTS) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Provide financial assistance to 45-50 low and moderate income youth in the city. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) le) Public Service $30,000.00 14. Totals $30,000.00 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $30,000.00 ��� 16 Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest EXHIBIT CI § 570.611 Conflict of interest. (a) Appplicability. page 1 of 4 (1) In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by recipients, and by subrecipients .(including those specified at § 570.204 (c)) , the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A 110, respectively, shall apply. (2) In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the acquisition and disposition of real property and the provision of assistance by the recipient, by its subrecipients, or to individuals, businesses and other private entities under eligible activities which authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation, preservation, and other.improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant to § 570.202, or grants, loans and other assistance to businesses, individuals and other private entities pursuant to § 570-203, § 570.204 or § 570.455). (b) Conflicts prohibited. Except for the use of CDBG funds to pay salaries and other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is that no persons described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with -respect to CDBG activities assisted under this part or who are in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. For the UDAG program, the above restrictions shall apply to all activities that are a part of the UDAG project, and shall cover any such interest or benefit during, or at any time after, such person's tenure. (c) Persons covered. The paragraph (b) of this section apply to consultant, officer, or of any designated under this part. or elected official public agencies, or conflict of interest provisions of any person who is an employee, agent, or appointed official of the recipient, subrecipients which are receiving funds (d) Exceptions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of the recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section on a case -by -case basis when it determines that such an exception will serve to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient administration of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be considered only after the recipient has provided the following: (1) A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a description of how the public disclosure was made; and 17 1 a.� r Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4 (2) An opinion of the recipient 1.s attorney that the interest for which the exception is sought would not Violate State or local law. (e) Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether to grant a requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the cumulative effect of the following factors, where applicable: (1) Whether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would otherwise not be available; (2) Whether an opportunity was provided for open competitive bidding or negotiation; (3) Whether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low or moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the assisted activity, and the exception will permit such person to receive generally the same interests or benefits as are being made available or provided to the group or class; ( 4 ) Whether the affected person has withdrawn from his or her functions or responsibilities, or the decision making process with respect to the specific assisted activity in question; (5) Whether the interest or benefit was present before the affected person was in a position as described in paragraph (b) of this section; (6) Whether undue hardship.will result either to the recipient or the person affected when weighed against the public interest -served, by avoiding the prohibited conflict; and (7) Any other relevant considerations. ;� 18 Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest Exhibit CI, page 3 of 4 Community Dvlpmt. Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 1 of 2) TOPIC: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODED RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: October 1989 This Conflict of Interest Code is written to comply with ,Federal Regulations (24 CFR Part 85). These Regulations. "Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments" require that grantees and sub -grantees will maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees. engaged in the award and administration of contracts. 1) No employee, officer or agent of the grantee shall participate in the selection, in the award or in the administration of a contract supported by Federal Funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. 2) Such a conflict will arise when: i) The employee, officer or agent; ii) Any member of the immediate family; iii) His/Her partners, or; iv) An organization which employs, or is about. to employ any of the above has a financial or other interest in the firm's selection for award. 3) The grantee's or sub -grantee's officers, employees or agents will neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to sub -agreements except as noted in Section 4. 4) A grantee's or sub -grantee's officers, employees or agents will be presumed to have a financial interest in a business if their financial interest exceeds the following: i) Any business entity in which the official has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. Any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. 9 19 Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4 Community Dvlpmt . Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 2 of 2) TOPIC: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: October 1989 iii) Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. iv) Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. v) Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by, or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. 5) For purposes of Section 4, indirect investment or interest means any - investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of an official, by an agent on behalf of an official, or by a business entity or trust in which the official, the official's agents, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10-percent interest or more. 20 i U Aft E2G "SI9 pale 1 or 2 Economic Opportunities for Section 3 Residents and Section 3 Business Concerns Sec. 135.38 Section 3 clause. All section 3 covered contracts shall include the following clause (referred to as the section 3 clause): A. The work to be performed under this contract is subject to the requirements of section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (section 3). The purpose of section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated by HUD assistance or HUD -assisted projects covered by section 3, shall, to the greatest extent feasible, be directed to low- and very low-income persons, particularly persons who are recipients of HUD assistance for housing. B. The parties to this contract agree to comply with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 135, which implement section 3. As evidenced by their execution of this contract, the parties to this contract certify that they are under no contractual or other impediment that would prevent them from complying with the part 135 regulations. C. The contractor agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with which the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement or other understanding, if any, a notice advising the labor organization or workers' representative of the contractor's commitments under this section 3 clause, and will post copies of the notice in conspicuous places at the work site where both employees and applicants for training and employment positions can see the notice.. The notice shall describe the section 3 preference, shall set forth minimum number and job titles subject to hire, availability of apprenticeship and training positions, the qualifications for each; and the name and location of the person(s) taking applications for each of the positions; and the anticipated date the work shall begin. D. The contractor agrees to include this section 3 clause in every subcontract subject to compliance with regulations in 24 CFR part 135, and agrees to take appropriate action, as provided in an applicable provision of the subcontract or in this section 3 clause, upon a finding that the subcontractor is in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR part 135. The contractor will not subcontract with any subcontractor where the contractor has notice or knowledge that the subcontractor has been found in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR part 135.. 21 EXHIBIT "S", page 1 or 2 E. The contractor will certify that any vacant employment positions,including training positions, that are filled (1) after the contractor is selected but before the contract is executed, and (2) with persons other than those to whom the regulations of 24 CFR part 135 require employment opportunities to be directed, were not filled to circumvent the contractor's obligations under 24 CFR part 135. F. Noncompliance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 135 may result in sanctions, termination of this contract for default, and debarment or suspension from future HUD assisted contracts. G. With respect to work performed in connection with section 3 covered Indian housing assistance, section 7(b) of the Indian Self -Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450e) also appliesto the work to be performed under this contract. Section 7(b) requires that to the greatest extent feasible (i) preference and opportunities for training and employment shall be given to Indians, and (ii) preference in the award of contracts and subcontracts shall be given to Indian organizations and Indian -owned Economic Enterprises. Parties to this contract that are subject to the provisions of section 3 and section 7(b) agree to comply with section 3 to the maximum extent feasible, but not in derogation of compliance with section 7(b). 22 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of "Pillars of the Community" Applications and Method of Recognition RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Once the names of those being recognized are approved by the City Council, a "Book of Deeds" will be established in the City Clerk's office. There is a nominal charge for the purchase of a book for this program. Should the City Council so desire to recognize individuals with a the at the "Spirit of La Quinta" fountain site on the Civic Center Campus, additional costs will be associated with that method of recognition. The estimated cost per tile (installed) is $400. The Art in Public Places account established for Civic Center Campus artwork could be used to fund this project. It is estimated that the cost of installing tiles recognizing all of the individuals in this report would be approximately $3,000. The balance of the Civic Center Campus artwork account is $130,162. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the September 18, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council considered the criteria for the "Pillars of the Community" program along with the criteria for the Veterans, Sports Figures and Artist acknowledgment areas (Attachment 1). At this L time, it was discussed by the City Council that those recognized as a "Pillar of the Community" would have a bronze plaque placed on a pillar at the "Spirit of La Quinta" fountain at the entrance to City Hall. On February 19, 2002, the City Council approved the criteria for the "Pillars of the Community" program. The criteria for each area are listed below: The criteria for the "Pillars of the Community" program require the candidate must have received City-wide recognition, contributed significantly to the development of the City and have signatures of twenty-five residents stating support for the candidate. As of this report, one application has been submitted for consideration in support of Matthew D. Bugg, principal of La Quinta High School. According to the application for Mr. Bugg, he has lived in La Quinta since 1994, and has received City-wide recognition for participating in the City's 20tn Anniversary Celebration, and through La Quinta High School's CIF football championships. In addition, Mr. Bugg's application states that he is committed to ensuring that La Quinta High School is a quality school that has contributed significantly to the development of La Quinta. The application is provided as Attachment 2. At the June 15, 2004 City Council meeting, the City Council discussed adding the names of the twelve individuals that have been recognized as the City's recipients for the Senior Inspiration Awards program (formerly known as "Living for Your 90's") offered by the County of Riverside (Attachment 3). Each year, the City Council selects one recipient that demonstrates a commitment to the community and a healthy lifestyle. The following individuals have received Senior Inspiration Awards on behalf of the City of La Quinta: 1992 Leola Bartholomew 1993 Dr. Madge Schlotthauer 1994 Grace Mulchay 1995 Lawrence Meyran 1996 (Program was not offered) 1997 Fred H. Rice 1998 David E. Orme 1999 Viola Messick 2000 Beverly Montgomry 2001 Bette Cheney 2002 Robert Tyler 2003 Jacques Abels 2004 Alice Bailes Bell 2 -4 Li Once the City Council approves the names of those individuals to be recognized as part of the "Pillars of the Community" program, the names will be recorded in a "Book of Deeds" to be maintained by the City Clerk's office. In addition, the City Council could adopt the "Pillars of the Community" as an Art in Public Places program on the Civic Center Campus and the plaques identifying the individuals could be funded by Art in Public Places funds. Individuals recognized by the City Council as "Pillars of the Community" recipients will be invited to attend a - future City Council meeting for formal recognition. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve Mr. Bugg's name and past Senior Inspiration Award recipients for listing in the "Book of Deeds" to be maintained by the City Clerk's office and authorize up to $3,000 from the Civic Center Campus artwork account be used to install bronze plaques on the pillars around the "Spirit of La Quinta" fountain; or 2. Do not approve Mr. Bugg's name and/or past Senior Inspiration Award recipients for listing in the "Book of Deeds" and/or do not authorize funds from the Civic Center Campus artwork account be used to install bronze plaques on the pillars around the "Spirit of La Quinta" fountain; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Y� die Horvitz, Co4nmunity Services Director . .-, r+3 1LJ Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Staff Report and Minutes from September 18, 2001 City Council Meeting Regarding "Pillars of the Community" Program 2. Application Regarding Mr. Bugg 3. Minutes from the June 15, 2004 City Council Meeting 4 ATTACHMENT 1 Tit 4 44" COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: d� September 18, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of the Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Area Criteria RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On September 19, 2000, the City Council approved an Art Purchase Agreement with artist William (Bill) Ware to provide three acknowledgment areas for the Civic Center Campus. The three areas would be designated to represent veterans, artists and sports figures. A set of recognition criteria is needed so that staff can begin soliciting names for the acknowledgment areas. At the August 7, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council appointed a sub- committee comprised of Council Members Terry Henderson and Ron Perkins to meet and provide a set of criteria for full City Council consideration at a future date. The sub -committee met on August 23, 2001 to discuss the criteria for the Civic Center Campus acknowledgment areas as provided in Attachment 1. The following recommendations are presented for City Council consideration: .,17 �_o I_ t} Veterans: 1. 3 year resident of La Quinta (past or present); and 2. Proof of Military Service: Form DD-214 or Notice of Separation The following classifications are considered Veterans by the Department of Veterans Affairs: Any person who served in Active Duty in full time service as a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, or as a commissioned officer of the Public Health Service, the Environmental Health Services Administration or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Completion of at least six years of honorable service in the Selected Reserves also qualifies. Artists: 1. 3 year resident of La Quinta (past or present); and 2. Achieved national, state or local recognition in the field of the arts; and 3. Contributed to the City of La Quinta's image; and 4. Nomination form must be signed by 10 citizens of La Quinta According to the Americans for the Arts Organization, the field of art includes the following categories: Painting, sculpture, the work, the performing arts, architecture, and landscape architecture. Sports: 1. 3 year resident of La Quinta (past or present); and 2. Achieved national, state or local recognition; and 3. Contributed to the quality of life for the citizens of the City of La Quinta; and 4. Nomination form must be signed by 10 citizens of La Quinta The committee is recommending that the title "Sports" be changed to "Athletics." The definition of sports is any recreational activity requiring physical exertion. The definition of athletics is an athletic sport requiring physical strength and skill. Along with the above referenced categories for the Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment areas, the following two recognition programs are being proposed: Pillars of the Community and City Council Recognition. S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.153.Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Area Criteria.wpd The proposed Pillars of the Community program would incorporate the following criteria: ft=P Pillars of the Community 1. 3 year resident of La Quinta (past or present); and 2. Achieved City-wide recognition; and 3. Contributed significantly to the development of the City of La Quinta; and 4. Nomination must be signed by 25 citizens of La Quinta The Pillars of the Community recognition area would consist of bronze plaques mounted on the pillars around the Kennedy sculpture on the north side of City Hall. The nomination process for the Arts, Sports, and Pillars of the Community would include names submitted upon a City provided form for consideration at the first City Council meeting in August. The first year of the program would be open to all who meet the criteria for each category. Each year thereafter, two names will be selected per category. A person may be nominated and recognized for more than one category: i.e., Arts and Sports. The engraving can be completed in August with an unveiling ceremony to be held in September. For consideration, as presented by the sub -committee, the information contained on the application form regarding the individuals selected for the Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment areas could be bound and maintained in a "Book of Deeds" on display in City Hall. The sub -committee also would like to present the concept of a City Council Recognition Area: Around the relief map area in the Historical Plaza on the Civic Center Campus, bronze name plates could be installed with the City Council member's name and specific years of service to the City. Each person who has served as a City Council member and/or Mayor would be recognized at this location. Should the City Council decide to include this new area of acknowledgment to the Civic Center Campus, the size and wording for the bronze plates will be presented at a future City Council meeting, for consideration. The committee also suggested that a tree be planted on the Civic Center Campus to acknowledge Mr. Fred Wolff as the City's first Mayor. S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.153.Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Area Criteria.wpd 3'? r% The alternatives available to the City Council include: 'l. Approve the acknowledgment area recognition criteria, the Pillars of the Community criteria, and authorize the City Council recognition area and direct staff to develop the program; or 2. Do not approve the acknowledgment area recognition criteria and/or the Pillars of the Community criteria and/or the City Council recognition area; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, I' Dodie Horvitz/Coir�munity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Sub -Committee Recommendations S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.153.Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Area Criteria.wpd O A A"W 2©12WI Agri 23, 2001 rtrn Civic Canter Campus Acknowledgment - Vetera w. Anss dt Athletics putpox To honer irAviduals, living or deceased who have made a signilicunt or notable contribution to lives of the citizens of LA Quittta AAkd - Pillars of the Cannrureity Vetemne - 1. Resident of City of La Quints 3 yeas (pest or present) 2. pmof of Military Service and Honorable discharge Datie checking on status of all Military coverage Arts - 1. , Resident of City of La Quinta 3 years (past or nrCSc11t) 2. Achieved notional, state or local recognition 3. Contributed to the City of La Quinta's Image D k checking on * inition Sports recommend change to Athletics - 1. Resident of City of La Quints 3years 2. Achieved national, state or local recognition 3. Contributed to the quality oj,lijif (if file Citizens f4 City of La Quinta Pillars of the Community - Bronze Plaques to he mounted rated on they pillrrr.s nrnNnd the John Xennedv sculptor 1. Resident of City or La Quinta 3 year.~ (pa,;t or i7rese"O 2. Achieved City-widt recognition J. Contributed .significantly to the development of the City of La Qulnta Pillars of the Community to included part recipients of Living Treasure etc by the C111*nbrr of Commerce piss _ ,Accept Iominations anytime but review, select once a year (maybe limit tmmber selected it: no Mote than 2 a year for each category) T'irst year should he Op t to however nmy oome in that meets the criteria). Nominations must by submitted on a City approved form signed by 10 citiz.enS (q' l,n Quinta jor the Rro and ,4rhletics - 25.1 #. Pillars - nnne )r reternrt,v. . t i,rm u-ill , c,�t�c►.tit details io suhstant iate ga4l4flcati0ns, wing &r* during the month c)f Augvat as that i% siciwext time of ycnr inct lcist emaunt of people using Civic Center. In Septe.mher hnVe some sort cif atinual unveiliq cerrmony, •"d,Mtona'lly eOPiet of the award -winning arrlications are in bound t»trt nWintaitted in a "Book oiUtedr " on dfsplq In ("itI 11u11 SO that the eaten! nJ•hr�nrn•t�e.s ' c r>tririht��rnn.e to the community mcr�p be known. 7W HATORICAL PLAZA - �lra�Md t1� reltejte►ap et�t'atre the names �j•RI! cattnc�i! members. �t'ave a t,ee rlu►ttecl and dedicated to Fred Wolff at the City ',s.rrt mcrta,r - City Council Minutes September 18, 2001 Council Member Sniff supported moving forward with the design to find out if construction of the sidewalk is feasible. He believed people will walk through the area, with or without a sidewalk, and that the City should try to make it safer. Council Member Adolph agreed. He felt the current condition is hazardous for people to use but stated he would not support anything that strips the mountain. He added he is waiting for the developer to restore the east side of the mountain to a more natural state.. Mayor Pena stated he supports moving forward with the design and determining further actions later. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to appropriate $16,874 from RDA Project Are No. 2 Funds and approve a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $9,840 with Warner Engineering for professional design services for a sidewalk on the north side of Highway 111 between Point Happy and the Cliff House Restaurant. Motion carried with Council Member Perkins voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-129. 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS ACKNOWLEDGMENT AREA CRITERIA. Community Services Director Horvitz presented the staff report. Council Members Henderson and Perkins gave a brief report on how the subcommittee arrived at the proposed recommendations. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Horvitz confirmed Merchant Marines who have served in active duty are recognized as veterans by the Department of Veterans Affairs. He requested they be added to the list. Council Member Adolph asked about the "honorably discharged" requirement. He also questioned who would be responsible for determining qualified recipients. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to revise the requirement for a "DD- 214 Form" to "honorably discharged." Council Member Henderson noted a nomination form with questions related to the criteria will be required for each nominee. Additionally, nomination papers for Artists and Sports figures will require signatures of 10 La Quinta citizens; 73 City Council Minutes 7 September 18, 2001 nomination papers for Pillars of the Community will require signatures of 25 La Quinta citizens. Council Member Adolph voiced concern that the Civic Center Campus might look like a cemetery and stated he preferred a monument, such as a "Mitchell Page Memorial" in honor of all veterans. Council Member Sniff stated he felt the Council's intent to recognize "veterans" is more limited than the Department of Veterans Affairs' definition. He also questioned "reserves" being included. Council Member Henderson agreed the acknowledgment area should be limited to veterans of normal military service. As for "reserves," she felt there should be some level of recognition for those who have made a commitment to be there when needed. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to include "reserves" who have served a minimum of six years of honorable service. In reviewing the criteria for artists, Council Member Sniff questioned how national, state, or local recognition of artists and sports would be recognized and expressed concern about the extreme subjectivity in regard to contribution to the City. He also felt there should be a minimum age for signing nomination papers. After a brief discussion, Council concurred on a minimum age of 18. Council Member Henderson noted national, state, or local recognition would come from some type of an award or medal. The criteria requires the person to have contributed to the City's image or quality of life. Council Member Sniff suggested compiling a list of competitive sports for the sports category instead of changing the category to athletics. He also suggested further thought be given to an appropriate acknowledgment for Fred Wolf, La Quinta's first Mayor. In response to Council Member Adolph, Council Member Perkins stated the subcommittee felt the acknowledgment for Mr. Wolff should be more specific rather than a section of the Bear Creek Bike Path. Council Member Henderson stated she felt a "Book of Deeds" would be appropriate to have on display at City Hall and Council concurred. Mayor Pena noted the City is also compiling a historical photo album. City Council Minutes September 18, 2001 Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, spoke in support of the "honorably discharged" criteria and commented on the need to recognize people in the education field. Mayor Pena noted "Pillars of the Community" will include a wide variety of fields. Council concurred to direct staff to redefine the criteria for the Civic Center Campus acknowledgment areas based on Council's comments and to draft an application form. Council further concurred to deal with an appropriate acknowledgment for Mr. Wolff as a separate issue. 3. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPOINTMENT TO THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE BI-MONTHLY WORKSHOPS. There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the City Clerk's Office. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to appoint Mayor Pena to serve for three meetings on the Chamber of Commerce Information Exchange Committee. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-130. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 29894-2, COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT, NRI-CCP I, A DELAWARE LLC.. There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the City Clerk's Office. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 29894-2 AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-112 as submitted. Motion carried with Council Member Adolph ABSTAINING due to a potential conflict of interest. 04 ATTACHMENT 2 7,77 ---- a t Y • . r w Please consider Mr. Matt Bugg, principal of La Quinta High School, as a "Pillar of the Community." Mr. Bugg has lived in La Quinta from 1983-84 and 1994-present. He received city-wide recognition not only at the 20`h Anniversary of La Quinta which was held in the LQHS Football Stadium, but through La Quinta High's CIF Football Championship recognitions. His efforts in ensuring that LQHS is a quality school have contributed significantly to the development of La Quinta. Here are the required 25 signatures. Name (Print) , Si tur Address P . L !;a�r f4, cW C)"2> i '.1 ' + � l' .t•Jl RI 7. 8. a 10. 1 2qqD bdLw �\fwd G Z eK ►� PEA? owl 6-10 76 -vb5- 6of kes Clr,. iqlo3 7�f2�f0 Pliann.Qr L(J %2a5; 25. i City Council Minutes 22 June 15, 2004 ATTACHMENT 3 CVAG Energy & Environmental Resources Committee -- Council Member Sniff indicated the fire ant issue will be coming forward with a funding formula based on the number of incidents and population. He feels the jurisdictions with the greatest problem should pay more. Council Member Perkins stated C. V. Mosquito & Vector Control District is trying to get a grant to continue modified enforcement of the program. All other reports were noted and filed. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 3-13. VACANCY ON THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to direct the City Clerk to advertise the vacancy and provide Council with copies of the applications for review. 3-C. VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER'S ANNUAL RECOGNITION DINNER. City Clerk Greek requested each Council Member review the proposed dates and contact her as to which dates do not conflict with their schedules. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS Z>O. DISCUSSION REGARDING PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY. Council Member Henderson voiced concern about some of the early "pillars of the community" not being included in the Pillars of the Community monument. She suggested each Council Member submit a name(s) of someone that may no longer have anyone to circulate an application for them for Council to consider. Mayor Adolph noted recognition is given to someone in the community each year at the Senior Inspiration Awards. Council Member Henderson stated she believes each one of those recognized in the past should be included in the Pillars of the Community. City Council Minutes 23 June 15, 2004 City Manager Genovese stated the names submitted by each Council Member can be brought back to Council for consideration. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved by Council Members Perkins/Osborne to adjourn to a special meeting of the City Council to be held June 18, 2004. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California. 1 0011 OF COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Street Name Change From Via CC to Via Montecito and Via DID to Via Mallorca in the Hideaway. Applicant: ND La Quinta Partners RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Street Name Change 2004-018. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND'OVERVIEW: Site Background These existing streets are within the Hideaway project north of PGA West. Via CC is in Tract 29894-4 with Via DID in Tract 29894-3 (Attachment 1). These tract phases were recorded without approval of street names. Both streets are short residential cul- de-sac streets west of Madison Street, north of Avenue 54. Applicable Code Provisions The Municipal Code permits the applicant to request a street name change. The request requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission and final approval by the City Council. Required is the written concurrence of at least 60% of the affected property owners along the street in question. 181 S:\CityMgASTAFF REPORTS ONLY\B4 SNC.doc Request The applicant had submitted a request to change Via CC to Via Montecito and Via DD to Via Mallorca to be consistent with the project's architectural theme. These names will not conflict with streets in the City or immediate area. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meeting of July 27, 2004 and adopted Resolution 2004-058, recommending approval of the street name change (Attachment 2). Environmental Consideration This street name change has been determined to be exempt from California Environmental Quality Act requirements under the provisions of Section 15301, Class One. Therefore, no further environmental review is deemed necessary. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings needed to approve this street name change can be made as noted in the attached Resolution. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the street name change; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the street name change; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Oscar Orci, Interim Community Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 092 S:\CityMgASTAFF REPORTS ONLY\64 SNC.doc .192 1S2 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of July 27, 2004 003 193 S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLYXB4 SNC.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET NAME CHANGE FROM VIA CC TO VIA MONTECITO AND VIA DD TO VIA MALLORCA IN THE HIDEAWAY CASE NO.: STREET NAME CHANGE 2004-018 APPLICANT: ND LA QUINTA PARTNERS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of August, 2004, consider a Street Name Change as requested by ND La Quinta Partners; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 27th, day of July, 2004 unanimously recommended approval of Street Name Change 2004-018 by adoption of Resolution 2004-058, and WHEREAS, said Street Name Change has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended by Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Department has determined that the proposed Street Name Change is categorically exempted pursuant to Section 15301(Class 1) of the Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act and no further review is deemed necessary; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify approval of Street Name Change 2004- 018: 1. The change would not detrimentally affect owners and tenants along the affected streets since all of the affected properties are owned by the applicant. 2. More than 60% of the affected property owners have agreed to the Street Name Change as required by Municipal Code Section 14.08.020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. The above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. The City Council does hereby approve Street Name Change 2004-018 per the attached Conditions of Approval and Exhibit A; 04 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\snc 2004-018 ND La partners\snc 2004-018 cc res.doc 184 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Street Name Change 2004-018 ND La Quinta Partners Adopted: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 005 t✓ P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\snc 2004-018 ND LQ partners\snc 2004-018 cc res.doc j, •.� ATTACHMENT 1 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 4. There being no other public comm9fit, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the Xearing. 5. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission R solution 2004-056, recommending certification of a Mitigated N gative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-495, a recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissi ners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. SENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: No . 6. It was moved and econded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning C mission Resolution 2004-057, recommending approval of Ten tive Tract Map 31852, as amended: a. Conditi n #13.A.: Avenue 52 and Madison Street (primary Arteri9f, Option A) - A minimum 20 foot from the R/W-P/L b. Cond' ion #52.A.2.c: 10-foot wide Multi -Use Trail. The app cant shall construct a meandering multi -use trail along th Madison Street frontage within the proposed landscaped s tback. Additionally, the applicant's design for the at- rade street crossing of the multi -purpose trail shall incorporate use of surface(s) other than concrete and be approved by the Public Works Department. The location and design of the multi -purpose trail shall also be approved by the Public Works Department. The multi -use trail, trail signs, and t e split rail fence shall be completed prior to issuance of qertificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. OLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. D. Street Name Change 2004-018; a request of ND La Quinta Partners for consideration of a street name change from Via Cc to Via Montecito and Via DD to Via Mallorca for streets within The Hideaway located on the east side -of Jefferson Street, north of Avenue 54. 009 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 487 87 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained.in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department, 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Gamlin, representing ND La Quinta Partners, gave a presentation on the project. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 4. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-058, recommending approval of Street Name Change 2004-018, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. E. -rer,+.,+..,e Tract -Ma 32068; a request of Marvin Investments for rtificatio.n of the subdivision of four acres into 12 single-family lots for the roperty located on the south side of Mandarina, vest of Pomelo, withi the Citrus Country Club. 1. Ch ' man Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff repor Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contain d in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Develop nt Department. Staff noted additional conditions being recommen d by the Public Works Department. 2. There being n\nt ons of staff Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant wouo address the Commission. Mr. Wells Marvin, represhe applicant, stated he was available to answer any quHe has no objections to the conditions as proposed. He the on -site drainage would go to the golf course. Assiy Engineer Steve Speer Mated that the condition coulended to state that if there was suitableoffsite locationbe allowed. 010 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc p 1J AVENUE t . EXHIBIT "A" CURRENT PROPOSED # NAME NAME .1 VIA "CC" VIA MONTECITO 2 VIA -DD- VIA MALLORCA THE HIDEAWAY STREET NAME CHANGE EXHIBIT I DETALED PLAN SCALE: 1 "= 1000' SNC 2004-01 8 0 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED STREET NAME CHANGE 2004-018 ND LA QUINTA PARTNERS ADOPTED: C;FNFRAL 1. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta in the event of any legal claim or litigation arising out of the City's approval of this project. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel in its sole discretion. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. All applicable conditions of Specific Plan 99-035 shall be met. 3. Prior to the changing of the street signs, the applicant shall obtain clearance from the following public agencies if necessary: Fire Marshal Public Works Department Sheriffs Department • Building and Safety Department 007 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\snc 2004-018 ND LQ partners\snc 2004-018 cc coa.doc j.:.1 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 3 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Investment Advisory Board 2004/2005 Work Plan PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Investment Advisory Board 2004/2005 Work Plan. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Fiscal implications consist of Board Members meeting expenses, budgeted at $4, 500, and staff support time. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Investment Advisory Board's 2004/2005 Work Plan at their July 14, 2004 meeting consisted of the following: • Meeting,, with the City Council to discuss using a Portfolio Manager, which if acceptable, would require an Ordinance change;. • Consider alternative investments based upon the increase in the size of the portfolio; • Continue to monitor developments regarding Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE's), LAIF, Corporate Notes and Commercial Paper; and i�. • Discuss extending the maturity limit from the two year maximum on the portfolio — currently $5 million in Treasury instruments may exceed the two year limit and may be invested up to five years. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the Investment Advisory Board 2004/2005 Work Plan; or 2. Do not approve the Investment Advisory Board 2004/2005 Work Plan; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, John M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 191) Co', iw w OF COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Continued Consideration of a Request by CONSENT CALENDAR: La Quinta Country Club to Include the Cost of Oleander Removal in the Previously -Approved Reimbursement STUDY SESSION: Agreement for Parkway Landscaping Along Eisenhower PUBLIC HEARING: Drive and Avenue 50 This item is requested to be continued to the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. 193 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: ORDINANCE NO. 408 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO A MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2004-120 APPLICANT: RJT HOMES — CODORNIZ, L.L.C. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 3rd day August, 2004, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing and to consider the request of, R.J.T. L.L.C., for a Zone Change for the property located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, as shown on Exhibit "A"., and more particularly described as: A.P.N.: 772-410-021 and 772-410-022, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 13' day July, 2004, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing and to consider the request of, R.J.T. 'L.L.C., for a Zone Change for the property located at the southeast. corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, approved Resolution No. 2004-048 , recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2004-120; and WHEREAS, said Zone Change has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality -Act of 1970 as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the Community Development. Department has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2004-505), and determined that the proposed Site Development Permit will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact is recommended for certification; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing. and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify a approving said Zone Change: 1. This Zone Change is consistent the updated General Plan, in that the zone change category proposed are consistent with those goals, objectives, and policies in the General Plan. 194 Ordinance No. 408 Zone Change 2004-120 RJT Homes L.L.C. Adopted: August 3, 2004 Page 2 2. The Zoning Change is suitable and appropriate for the property involved because it is a small rectangular shaped lot more suitable for the medium high intensity development. 3. The new land use designation is compatible with the similar designations within the City because the property is accessible from Arterial streets. 4. This Zone Change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in that the resulting land uses will require Planning Commission review and approval of development plans, which will ensure adequate conditions of approval. 5 That the Zone Change is warranted since there has been a change in development patterns in the general vicinity since the commercial designation was made. SECTION 1. The official Zoning Map for the City of La Quinta is hereby amended for those areas shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of the this Ordinance. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places, designated by Resolution of the. -City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof_of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on this 17T" day of August, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Ordinance No. 408 Zone Change 2004-120 RJT Homes L.L.C. Adopted: August 3, 2004 Page 3 DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 96 ��q� EXHIBIT AVENUE .5 PROJECT LOCATION � ' I + j •: • lam' \ � � � �1 // Y" i ♦ V�J fir• i✓ . ,. ,` Y.. _• ��'• `•_ O • ` !'� ..i,�!'T'. sue. �-•••-i �'�-''�r%.; �� 4 .. i LU I 2 `� 1 j.J-•. ;i i, F� PROPOSED ZONING The proposed Zoning for the plan area is Medium High Density Residential - (RMH). CASE MAP ORTH CASE No. ZONE C:#-1ANGE 2004-120 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 7, 2004 10:00 a.m. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:05 a.m. by Planning Manager Oscar Orci who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Frank Christopher, and David Thorns. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of June 2, 2004. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to approve the Minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved with Committee Member Christopher abstaining. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2004-810; a request of Troche Design for consideration of architectural plans to remodel the guardhouse and access improvements for the La Quinta Golf Estates located on Coachella Drive between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida El Nido. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. JL98 G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\7-7-04 WD.doc Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee July 7, 2004 2. Committee Member Thoms asked that the landscape plan be submitted to the Committee for approval. 3. Committee Member Christopher asked about the wall configuration and how it will impact the two adjacent homes. Staff stated the Homeowners' Association is the applicant and it is assumed they have obtained approval of the four adjoining homes that will be impacted. As the applicant is not present at this meeting, staff is unable to know for certain. Unless something is received in writing, it will be up to the Planning Commission to make that determination. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the wood detail and material for the trellis is not stipulated and is a concern to him in regard to the maintenance. The look is attractive, but bougainvillea plants on a trellis are hard to maintain. Both the plant and wood will be a problem. The gatehouse belongs to the HOA and although it will not be seen from Eisenhower Drive he would like them to know they will have maintenance problems. He would like to see a cross section of the planters to see that they are constructed correctly. Also a listing of the proposed trees. 5. Committee Member Christopher noted the end caps of the trellis and building are not defined as to how they will be tied together. In totality there seems to be a lot of issues that are pertinent to this remodel that the Committee should review and see that it is done correctly. Yet, it appears that all the information is not before the Committee for them to make a decision. From Eisenhower Drive you will see the redesign of the fire access gates, but the plans do not show any elevation of the new fire gates, which the public will see. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated the Fire Department did not want them to make any changes to the fire gates. Committee Member Christopher noted the plans submitted show them moved and set back from their existing position. Staff noted it was their understanding that the existing gates will be retained and only moved back. 199 G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\7-7-04 WD.doc 2 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee July 7, 2004 6. Committee Member Thoms stated the fire gates need to be updated to what is being proposed for the gatehouse remodel. 7. Committee Member Christopher asked if staff knew the materials or colors of the gate. Staff stated the elevations submitted are all that has been received. The Committee can make a recommendation regarding what they want to be used. 8. Committee Member Bobbitt asked how they could expand the entrance from one lane in each direction to two lanes in each direction. The landscape area noted on the plans in front of the gatehouse is not explained as to whether or not it is a raised planter or a six-inch curb. This information should be provided to the Committee. 9. Committee Member Christopher stated he would like to know that the homeowners of the four houses to be affected have been notified and given their input. 10. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Christopher to adopt Minute Motion 2004-022 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2004-810, as recommended by staff and amended: a. Condition added: the landscaping plan shall be submitted for approval by the Committee. b. Condition added: the end caps of the trellis structure and building should be better defined. C. Condition added: the trellis material shall be reviewed and approved by the Committee. It shall consist of a material that will not be a wood timber to withstand the desert weather. d. Condition added: the fire gates shall be upgraded to complement the project. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. GAWPD0CS\ALRC\7-7-04 WD.doc 3 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee July 7, 2004 VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None. VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on August 4, 2004. This meeting was adjourned at 10:46 a.m. on July 7, 2004. Respectfully submitted, 4BE;TYf. AWYER Executive Secretary G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\7-7-04 �VD.doc 4 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM_: %lo MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A Regular meeting held at the. La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA June 17, 2004 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by' Chairperson Leslie Mouriquand at 3:07 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Sharp, Wilbur, and Chairperson Mouriquand Absent: It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp to .excuse Commissioners Puente and Wright. Unanimously approved. Staff Present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: None IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp to approve minutes of the May .20, 2004, as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the La Quinta Family Apartments and Phase I Paleontological Survey for the La Quinta. .7 Family Apartments; Applicant: UHC La Quinta LP Archaeological/Paleontological Consultant: TRC Companies (Greig Parker, RPA) P:\CAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 6-17-04.doc U 2 Last printed 7/16/04 8:53 AM Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 Location: East of Dune Palms Road, approximately 650 feet south of Highway 111. ' 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in, the Community Development Department. ' 2. Commissioner Sharp asked if any of, the persons in attendance represented the builder. 3. Mr. John Beardall, 1124 Main Street, Irvine, California introduced himself as the project manager/consultant for UHC La Quinta Limited Partners. He was available to answer any - questions the Commissioners might have. In addition, the cultural resources consultants, Greig Parker and Christopher Drover were in attendance from TRC Solutions, 21 Technology, Irvine, California. 4. Commissioner Sharp had a concern about digging deep enough for a swimming pool or any subterranean garage. He wanted to know exactly how deep they were going to dig. 5. Mr. Beardall replied they were not going to approach the -100 meter depth. They will probably only dig about 5 to 10 feet for a small swimming pool. 6. Commissioner Wilbur said in the original correspondence there was a contact list suggested by the Heritage Commission. 'He wanted to know if any attempt had been made to contact any of those individuals. 7. Mr. Drover, Archaeologist for TRC Solutions, replied no, it was an addendum to the methods search. This was a Phase I and this type of contact would normally not be made during the Phase I. 8. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if there was any early scoping on this project. Mr. Drover replied nothing prior to the survey. 9. Commissioner Sharp commented this is a very sensitive area and he was amazed nothing was found. 2 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 10. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if a (GLO) Government Land Office search had been completed for homesteading and land granting. Mr. Parker replied a previous records search. had found nothing. 11. Chairperson Mouriquand said there were a number of homesteads and land grants all throughout La Quinta. She asked if the work by James and Moore had been cited in the references as she was unable to locate the reference. Mr. Parker replied they did not actually do the GLO records search. The original search was done by Bruce Love and Tom Tang. 12. Chairperson Mouriquand asked how close the Coachella Canal was to the property and stated the Canal was determined to be eligible for the National Register. Given the proximity to the Whitewater River and the long zone of sites, it was interesting that nothing was found. 13. Mr. Parker said he had completed previous studies in t-he area and did find some significant sites, but nothing was found ; on this site. 14. Chairperson Mouriquand said the Commission prefers the Phase I studies include early scoping letters to the local tribes, which are the Cabazon, Augustine, and the Torres Martinez Bands. The Commission also encourages the early contact of these Bands looking for any ethnographic information such as sacred sites or any concerns they might have in the language and recommendations for mitigation measures. It would have been nice to have a discussion on more of the historic information on La Quinta and commentary on the GLO search. She felt enough concerns had been addressed and she did not have a problem with the report. 15. Commissioner Sharp thanked the applicant for the nice presentation. 16. Commissioner Wilbur asked for a recap of what was recommended. Staff pointed out the conditions. 3 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 17. ' Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the applicant, or staff, could forward a copy of this report to the three Bands in the form of a scoping letter. Possibly they could be asked to respond back by a certain date if there are additional mitigation measures they wish to put forward. Staff requested the applicant be required to submit proof, to the Community Development Department, indicating the tribes had been contacted and would provide someone for monitoring if it was required. 18. Chairperson Mouriquand commented almost all of the Bands are requiring a tribal monitor, not just for the construction monitoring, but also during surveying. This is a new policy being requested. Staff replied this could be included in Condition A. 19. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and ,Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2004-012 accepting the Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the La Quinta Family Apartments, with the following added to Condition 1.A.: The applicant shall provide proof the local tribes, consisting of the Torres -Martinez, Augustine and Cabazon Bands, have been contacted and will have a representative available for monitoring if required. Unanimously approved. 20. Commissioner Wilbur had a comment on the Paleontological Report. He recalled there had previously been discussion regarding the depths of 10 -or 30 feet. After reviewing the report he was wondering if it wouldn't be helpful to define what the word "deep" means with respect to the upper layers of the quadrant. area. The report states "below that" and does not explain what depth the report refers to. 21. Chairperson Mouriquand added it is necessary to consider the nature of the project. This project is a residential project and the excavation will probably be three to five feet with an on -site retention basin. Mr. Beardall stated they would not be going below 10 feet in any area of the project. Staff said this would only be a concern if a well site was proposed and there was J none. 4 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2004-013 accepting the Phase I Paleontological Survey for the La Quinta Family Apartments, subject to conditions. Unanimously approved.-, B. Paleontological Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract 32201; Applicant: Choice Enterprise Paleontological Consultant: CRM Tech (Harry Quinn) Location: Northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairperson Mouriquand asked why the Commission was asked to review the report when the records search had not been completed. Staff replied there was an indication, in the report, the Commission could place conditions on the project prior to taking final CEQA action, if it was necessary. Staff understood, the applicant came to certain conclusions on their site, based upon information obtained from surrounding sites. Staff has taken this into consideration when the recommendations were prepared. Staff reminded the Commission, based on previous meetings, the applicant had expressed his wishes to process this application as early as possible and that was the reason it was submitted without the response from the San Bernardino County Museum. 3. Chairperson Mouriquand was concerned about receiving an incomplete report. The purpose of doing the reports is to answer the CEQA questions so you have all the information you need to decide if there's any impact on resources, what the significance of the resources are and what the appropriate mitigation should be. If the report is incomplete it is difficult to make a recommendation. Staff replied they did give the applicant credit for the fact the report was prepared as if it had the potential of having a highly significant impact on the site. Chairperson Mouriquand stated she did know in this area a significant clam bed was found nearby. � �.'6 5 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 4. Staff introduced Gabriel Lujan,74818 Velie Way, Suite 12, Palm Desert. Mr. Lujan said he was unaware the report was incomplete but was there to represent the client and answer any questions the Commission might have. 5. Chairperson Mouriquand advised him the Commission does require complete reports. 6. Commissioner Wilbur said he was uncomfortable with making a recommendation using an incomplete report. Staff did offer some recommendations: 1) the Commission could wait and continue the matter to another meeting date; 2) place a condition requiring the applicant submit the information to staff and if complete staff could approve it to move the CEQA process along; or 3) follow the current staff recommendations... 7. Mr. Lujan stated he did not have any, problems. with ,either recommendations 2 or 3, and if staff didn't feel comfortable with the information provided, he would be more than. glad to come back in. 8. Commissioner Sharp asked if the Commission would be meeting during the month of July. Staff replied yes. 9. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if there were any issues that could come back which would cause the Commissioners to be concerned. 10. Commissioner Sharp commented this issue had to do with protocol. 11. Chairperson Mouriquand said she didn't want to establish a precedent for accepting incomplete reports. She did not feel it was appropriate for the Commission and didn't fulfill the requirements of CEQA. She added the Commission didn't want to be unfriendly to developers, but they had rules and regulations they had to abide by. She asked if there was any situation or information that could come back from this records search which the Commission might want to see and consider. 12. Commissioner Sharp replied it was a relatively small piece of property and its residential construction with a high water table. Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 , 13. Chairperson Mouriquand was concerned since the clam bed found by Dr. Chace was not at any great depth. The site was documented as a Paleontological Locality. It was not necessary to go very deep to get into the invertebrate fossils. 14. Commissioner Sharp commented there was a row of tamarisks trees on site and wanted to* know if they had been removed. 15. Mr. Lujan replied the tamarisk trees were scheduled to be removed and would be monitored as the Commission previously requested. 16. Commissioner Wilbur stated he thought tension was created by the difficult decision between processing a report by the book, or reviewing an incomplete report and then fast -tracking the project on an individual basis. He sympathized with the applicant, but was not amenable to reviewing the report without information from the San Bernardino County Museum. Staff .replied possibly the Commission could give staff some direction in terms of the protocol regarding acceptable reports. If the client does not have a response from the Museum, how much weight should staff give to the applicant for collecting information from surrounding areas. Staff requested direction on how to handle the issue if the report recommends monitoring of the site versus the fact the comments have not been received. from the San Bernardino County Museum. Staff would like guidance on how to evaluate these reports. 17. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the commentary coming from the San Bernardino County Museum represents the most local repository and is the most important records search. She would feel more comfortable accepting the report if the information was coming from the Los Angeles County Museum. She has found that information from the various repositories can be identical, but not always. She questioned if something massive were found on a nearby site what additional mitigation measures could be recommended that were not already recommended. Monitoring is already listed as a condition and that would be all the Commission could recommend. Her major concern was in establishing a precedent in accepting an incomplete report, but she did not want to be, unreasonable to the applicant. She said she could not imagine any comment t' i Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 coming back from the San Bernardino County Museum that would really alter the recommendations for mitigation already established. Staff thanked her for her comments about incomplete reports and, in the future, would pass them along to the applicants. Staff also added the applicants were commonly advised it is their prerogative to submit information to the Commission, incomplete or not. It is the Commission's prerogative to turn down the applicant's requests due to incomplete reports. 18. Commissioner Wilbur said he understood the value of comparative areas but discoveries are made all the time in very specific locations not related to surrounding discoveries. Staff. added the final action would be determined by the City Council. So there were actually two more opportunities for this project to be reviewed. 19. Commissioner Sharp commented this was the third timq .this project had been brought before the Commission. Staff replied the applicant was aware of the Commission's concern. The applicant's representative, Mr. Lujan, said he would look into the lack of reply from the San Bernardino County Museum and would have an answer back to staff by the end of week. Y 20. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2004-014 accepting - the Paleontological Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract 32202 amended: Recommendation 3: Information received from a records search from the San Bernardino County Museum will be submitted to Community Development Department staff for approval prior to continuance of the project. If staff deems the information to be complete, applicant will re -submit the report to the Historic Preservation Commission for its further consideration. Unanimously approved. 8 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 C. Historical/Archaeological Resources and Paleontological Resources Assessment Report for Assessor's Parcel No. 762-240-011; Applicant: D.U.C. Housing Partners Archaeological/Paleontological Consultant: CRM Tech Location: North side of Avenue 58, approximately one-half mile west of Madison Street. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Wilbur asked if there was any information found in the historic search. Staff replied it did not. 3. Chairperson Mouriquand said she recalled the area where the property is located as being very sensitive for recorded sites, and materials that have been picked up by avocational collectors. The area has proven to be highly sensitive and there have been cremations and ceremonial offering caches found close by. Therefore, the Commission would definitely want to have it monitored. 4. Commissioner Sharp asked if the application was just for a housing development 5. Chairperson Mouriquand was concerned the report did not recommend monitoring considering the sensitivity of the area. She was glad to see staff was recommending it. She noticed the firm doing the survey used 15 meter spaced transects. Staff replied all reports the Commission reviewed at this meeting used the same criteria. 6. Chairperson Mouriquand replied 15 meters is approximately 50 feet, or 25 feet on center. It would be difficult to spot a pot shard, point, or any other small item, at a distance of 25 feet on either side of a person. Federal Standards are 10 meters which is approximately 30 feet. That would be 15 feet on each side of a person. She was concerned about the efficiency of a report using these methods and past reports used 10 meter transects. Staff reiterated all reports are now using 15 meters. Chairperson Mouriquand said she hoped this was not a trend for more cost effectiveness at the sacrifice of adequate survey 9 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 coverage. She was wondering if staff and the Commission should consider a policy, about how wide the transects should be. Traditionally the archaeology in this area' does not consist of large items and 50 feet apart is too far. Small items could be missed. Staff asked the Commissioners to agendize this item and bring it back for discussion. Chairperson. Mouriquand again expressed her concern because this section of land is in a highly sensitive area and she was worried about small items being overlooked. She was glad staff was recommending monitoring, but there was not enough appreciation on the part of the consultant for the sensitivity of this area as evidenced by the lack of discussion and 'recommendation for monitoring. She supported staff's recommendations for the report. 7. Chairperson Mouriquand said all of this area was formerly part of the Kennedy Ranch. The Kennedy Ranch was loaded with artifacts, at one point in time. An extensive collection has been retained by the original owners. She commented it could simply 'be this was such a small area there was just nothing left and the land so disturbed there was nothing left on the surface, but there still could be a high potential for subsurface finds. The Coral Mountain area is within a mile -and -a -half of this project and is also very sensitive, as well as the Quarry which is highly sensitive as evidence by some earlier work by CRM Tech. 8. Commissioner Wilbur asked if it was possible to add a recommendation about the halting of earth moving equipment if something is found. 9. Chairperson Mouriquand replied it was already included in the conditions. However, grading operators generally don't look or stop for a cache of something. She felt it was an ineffective mitigation measure and preferred on -site monitoring. 10. Commissioner Wilbur verified with staff that monitoring had been added as a condition. Staff replied it had. 11. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the Commission would see the monitoring reports when they come back. Staff replied yes, when they are submitted. 10 y Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 , 12. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the consultants had contacted the tribes. The applicants needed to provide evidence they had contacted the tribes in the form of a scoping letter, and if they had not received a reply, they needed -to provide that information as well. She also asked if they had contacted the Heritage Commission.. Staff replied there was no indication the tribes were contacted. Chairperson Mouriquand said in the research methods on Page 5, there was no discussion regarding contact of the Heritage Commission or any of the three local tribes. She suggested,, prior to CEQA action, the applicant submit evidence of contact with the Cabazon, Torres Martinez, and Augustine Band, as well as the Native American Heritage Commission. 13. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2004-015 accepting the Historical/Archaeological Resources Assessment Report for Assessor's Parcel No. 762-240-011, subject to conditions prepared by staff as well as the following condition: D. Applicant shall amend the report to include proof of contact, prior to CEQA action, indicating the applicant has contacted the Cabazon, Torres Martinez, and Augustine Bands, as well as the Native American Heritage Commission. Unanimously approved. 14. Chairperson Mouriquand commented there shouldn't be any problems due to the elevations. Because this site was once under water, there is the possibility of finding invertebrates as well as clam beds, but they would be picked up during monitoring. 15. Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp had no further comments. 16. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2004-016 accepting the Paleontological Resources Assessment for Assessor's Parcel No. 762-240-01 1, subject to conditions. Unanimously approved. rj . j ri 11 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. There was discussion of the July 15, 2004 training session. Staff advised they would have most of the Community Development Department staff in attendance. Since there will be Commission items to be reviewed, the meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and continue in the Council Chambers at 2:00 p.m. for the training. Chairperson Mouriquand said the training would be focused on the; ARMR Format and how it should be followed. She would be using the ARMR checklist to illustrate how to review a report. B. Commissioner Wilbur asked about the press release for May, .- "Historic Preservation" month. Staff said an article would be in the La Quinta Gem regarding Historic Preservation Month and highlighting the 10th Anniversary of the Commission. C. Commissioner Sharp asked about the rescheduling of Gary Resvaloso's attendance at a future meeting. Staff replied they had continued contacting Mr. Resvaloso, but had not received a response.' The Commissioners suggested staff try another strategy in contacting Mr. Resvaloso. D. Chairperson Mouriquand brought up the subject of the width of the transects. She commented this could be added to an upcoming meeting agenda. The Commission could set policy as to how they want the reports done, since they are a CLG Agency. She also commented the Federal Agencies require 10 feet, but that didn't mean the Commission had to require 10 feet. However, it is very difficult to do a thorough job when you are responsible for looking at a 50 foot swath. She added the Commission should have a discussion about accepting incomplete reports, as well as how to handle blended Archaeo/Paleo reports. 4`2i3 12 Historic Preservation Commission June 17, 2004 E. Chairperson Mouriquand will be conducting a mobile workshop, October 19, 2004, as part of the American Planning Associat'iton's Annual Conference, in Palm Springs, at the Wyndham Hotel. It will be a bus tour to the Coral Mountain Regional Park Site area.. There will be speeches given on the pre -history, history, rock art in the tufa, bedrock mortars in the tufa, and general archaeological and historical discussion on creating a Regional Park. - The discussion will be regarding how to plan a regional park and take the cultural resources, pre -history, and history, and weave it in. This would be good planning. The tour will begin at 8:00 a.m. and end at 12:00 p.m. The tour was set up for conference attendees but staff will be looking into. attendance by the Commissioners. If that is not possible, Chairperson Mouriquand may be able to set up a tour for the Commission. The APA bus tour will include aisle side instruction on the local sites and. history of the Valley. She added the groundbreaking, for the Regional Park, is slated for November., This will be , agendized - for f4rTher discussion at a later meeting. I VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded , by Commissioners Sharp and Wilbur to adjourn this Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next Meeting to be held on July 15, 2004 at 1:00 p.m.. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 4:27 p.m. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: Carolyn Talker Secretary 214 13 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 1'7 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 13, 2004 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Kirk who asked Commissioner Quill to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Rick Daniels, Ken Krieger, Kay Ladner, Paul Quill, and Chairman Tom Kirk. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston, Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: A. Mr. Rick Wilkerson, representative of Point Happy Ranch, spoke regarding street names within the development. His concern was the requirement to use the same street name for a street that extends into his development. His development is a gated community and they were conditioned to use historic names for their streets and they have proposed those names to staff. He went over the street names they are proposing. He asked for direction in regard to the street names. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated they would speak with the City Attorney and report back to the applicant and the Commission. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of the regular meeting of June 22. 2004. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Daniels to approve the minutes as submitted. Commissioners Krieger and Ladner abstained. B. Department Report: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 V. RESOLUTIONS OF RECOGNITION: A. Chairman Kirk presented a Resolution of Recognition to Commissioner Robert Tyler and thanked him for his years of service to the City. VI. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR: A. Chairman Kirk opened nominations for Chair. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Daniels/Ladner to nominate Tom Kirk as Chair. There being no further nominations, nominations were closed and Tom Kirk was elected as Chair. Unanimously approved. B. Chairman Kirk opened nominations for Vice Chair. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to elect Paul Quill as Vice Chair. There being no other nominations, Paul Quill was elected Vice Chair. Unanimously approved. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 2003-480 and Tentative Tract Map 31087; a request of Tahiti Partners V, LLC for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and consideration of a subdivision of ± 5 acres into 10 single-family lots for the property located on the south side of Darby Road, ± 1 /4 mile east of Washington Street. 1. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to continue the project to July 27, 2004, as requested by the applicant. Unanimously approved. B. Environmental Assessment 2004-495 and Tentative Tract Map 31852; a request of Ehline Company for consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and the subdivision of 8.5 acres into 14 single-family lots for the property located at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 52. 1. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Quill to continue the project to July 27, 2004, as requested by the applicant. Unanimously approved. C. Street Name Change 2004-017; a request of Larry Sherman for consideration of a street name change from Simon Drive to Deputy Lee Drive for the street located east of Washington Street, south of and parallel to Highway 1 1 1 . G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 26 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 1 . Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Oscar Orci presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Larry Sherman, the applicant, stated his reasons for requesting the name change. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Neil Lingle, 74-075 Covered Wagon Trail, Assistant Sheriff of Riverside County representing Sheriff Doyle, stated the Sheriff and Assemblywoman Garcia are working on a joint venture to rename a portion of Highway 1 1 1 to the Bruce Lee Memorial Highway. This would be in addition to any other honorariums. He went on to give a history of Deputy Lee. He asked the Commission's support for this request. 4. Mr. Larry Allen, 73-484 Cottontail Court, Thousand Palms, stated he objected to the renaming of this street. He would prefer the Commission changed the name of one of the Avenues. He believed in honoring Deputy Lee, but would prefer a different street. Mr. Simon was a great contributor to the City and he would hate to see the City forget the support Fred Simon gave to the City. 5. Mr. Rick Wilkerson, 78-370 Highway 1 1 1, La Quinta, stated he knew Deputy Lee and believes recognition should be given to him. He also knew Fred Simon and would like to offer an alternative by suggesting the entrance to the SilverRock Golf Resort. This street would be as appropriate as it will be a highly visible street. 6. Mr. Randy Vasques, 78-445 Via Sevilla, stated his reasons for supporting the street name change. In addition to the reasons already stated, Highway 1 1 1 was one of Deputy Lee's primary areas he patrolled and it is the gateway into La Quinta. 7. Mr. Martin Brhel, 77-665 Avenida Montezuma, stated he is retired from the Riverside County District Attorney's office and worked with Deputy Lee on numerous occasions. He proceeded to give his reasons to support the street name change in honor of Deputy Lee. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc ��.. 1 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 8. Ms. Mary Brhel, 77-665 Avenida Montezuma, stated her reasons for supporting the street name change. She talked about the importance of our police officers and the support they give to cities. 9. Ms. Colleen Walker, 75-368 La Cresta, Palm Desert, stated her reasons for supporting the street name change. She noted that she had worked and trained with Deputy Lee for the last 25 years 10. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 11. Commissioner Ladner stated she appreciates the suggestion to name the entrance to SilverRock for Deputy Lee. She does recognize the importance of the Highway 1 1 1 recognition. She asked for staff direction. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated the action before the Commission is to approve or deny this request. If they believe the name change should be approved they will need to adopt a resolution setting a date for a public hearing to recommend to the City Council the street name change. If they wish to choose a different location, a new public hearing will be scheduled. 12. Commissioner Daniels stated that although he did not have the privilege of knowing Deputy Lee, he honors his memory as those present. The question before the Commission is how best to honor him. This is a specific proposal and this Commission needs to make a choice as to how best do this without dishonoring someone who helped in the formation of this City. The two suggestions, Highway 1 1 1 visibility and the entrance to SilverRock Resort, are excellent choices. He would be inclined to support the request as made. 13. Commissioner Krieger stated it appears those present would prefer the request as submitted. The location appears to be of importance to everyone. 14. Commissioner Quill stated he agrees Simon Drive has a connection to two major streets in La Quinta and their logic in requesting this street is compelling. In terms of people seeing this street, SilverRock would not have as much exposure. 1218 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 4 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 15. Chairman Kirk stated the option before the Commission is a yes or no vote and he does have some concern about removing a name of someone who has made a contribution to the City. He would suggest staff look into a better process for determining a street name change and bring this back to the Commission. He would prefer to see options. This may be the best place for honoring this person, but there may be better ways that could be explored for the future requests to give the Commission and Council options. He expressed concern about removing the name of someone who has contributed to the development of the City and believes there should be options available to the Commission so it is not just a yes or no choice. 16. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-042, recommending approval of Street Name Change 2004-017, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Environmental Assessment 2004-508 and Tentative Tract Map 32279; a request of Duc Housing Partners, Inc. for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and consideration of the subdivision of 9.71 acres into 31 single-family and other miscellaneous lots for the property located on the north side of Avenue 58, 2,100 ± feet west of Madison Street. 1. Commissioners Daniels and Krieger noted a potential conflict of interest due to the location of their residences and left the dais. 2. Chairman Kirk opened the public, hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Quill asked if the distance of 1320 was sufficient for the cul-de-sac. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated yes. Commissioner Quill asked about a modification to the stacking at the entry as to whether an alternative configuration should be considered. Staff noted no, but there was a change in the location of the driveway. Commissioner Quill asked if there had been any study on the access should it have to be moved to G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 5 �" Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 the east. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated the driveways on both sides of the property are nonconforming. There is no way to have this access comply with the General Plan without having a shared access. If the applicant cannot obtain the access rights from the adjacent property owner, the General Plan does allow the City Engineer to create the safest possible mechanism to construct the access. 4. Chairman Kirk stated that with the change in the driveway to the east or sharing the access to the west it will drastically change the tract map and therefore, he is not sure what they are approving. The whole orientation of the project may change drastically. Staff noted they should be able to come up with the same number of lots. The main change will be the street entrance along Avenue 58. The applicant can better address the question. 5. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dan Lee, civil engineer representing the applicant, gave a presentation on a shared access that would allow them to have the same number of lots. He stated they have reviewed the conditions and have no objections. He went on to describe the project. 6. Commissioner Quill questioned the length of the cul-de-sac. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer explained why it was of sufficient size for the City and Fire Department. 7. Mr. Richard Baker, 80-600 Avenue 58, property owner to the east, stated he had just finished working with the developer to the east of his property that affected his property. He is not looking forward to another development. He believes the proposed alternative access is the best solution to the problem and he would be willing to share an entrance. He is willing to grant an easement to allow the shared entrance. He will lose the privacy of his own access as well as a large eucalyptus tree. He would request these expenses be required of this developer. 8. Commissioner Quill asked if he was willing to give the full easement if it is at the developer's expense. Mr. Baker stated that in principle yes, but he would like to see a better drawing showing the relationship to his property. He requests the wall between the properties be a minimum of six feet on his side, with his grade. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 6 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 9. Mr. C. Cleeman, 54-420 Vallejo, consultant for the developer, stated they have taken Mr. Baker's concern into consideration and they are more than willing to accept all costs related to the entrance and agree to the six-foot high wall on his property line. 10. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 11. Commissioner Quill asked that the conditions be reworded to state the developer shall be required to pay for all costs associated with the easement and east entry for the full access. He further stated he would like to see a more creative design of the retention basin such as a park space or amenity to the property. 12. Commissioner Ladner stated she agrees with Commissioner Quill's comments on the retention basin. 13. Chairman Kirk complimented the developer on the design of the tract map and asked staff if there was any opportunity to change the design of the retention basin. Planning Manager Oscar Orci noted there were opportunities to change the design, but not the purpose of the retention basin. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-043, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-508, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Ladner, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Daniels and Krieger. ABSTAIN: None. 15. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Ladner, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-044, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 32279, as amended: a. Condition added: The applicant shall be responsible for constructing a six-foot high wall on the property line with the east property owner for the length of the project. 4. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 7 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 b. Condition added; The applicant shall make every effort to acquire the easement from the eastern property owner for the construction of a shared entry and shall bear the sole expense for the shared entry. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Ladner, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Daniels and Krieger. ABSTAIN: None. Commissioners Daniels and Krieger rejoined the Commission. E. Site Development Permit 2004-810; a request of La Quinta Golf Estates for consideration of architectural plans to remodel the existing La Quinta Golf Estates guardhouse and driveway access improvements for the property located on Coachella Drive between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida El Nido. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if the turning radius at Coachella Drive and Eisenhower Drive was being changed. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer noted the changes that were occurring at this location. 3. Commissioner Daniels asked if there was a way to accommodate the concerns raised by Mr. Wales. Staff noted the problems were raised by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee (ALRC), but the applicant had not completed the landscape concept plans. The ALRC therefore, requested the final details of the project be brought back to them for review. Therefore, staff has added a condition requiring them to go back to the ALRC. 4. Commissioner Ladner asked if the height of the trellis was addressed. Staff noted it is the primary entrance, and the height was required to be 13'6" as stipulated by the Fire Department. Commissioner Ladner asked if the residents were supporting the proposal. Staff stated the residents had been informed, but to staff's knowledge, no presentation had been made to the residents regarding the details. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 8 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 5. Commissioner Krieger asked if moving vans would be able to enter at this gate. Staff stated yes, but if the Commission had any concerns, they could restrict the trellis to only one lane. 6. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mose Troche stated the project had been presented to the homeowners. It is the intent to improve the entrance and increase the number of lanes going in and out. He went on to describe the proposal. The height of the trellis is 14 feet. As to maintenance, the beams will be glu-lam and maintenance should be minimal. They are concerned with the requirement for a sidewalk that it would decrease the amount of landscaping they would like. There is no room and they would like to have it deleted. 7. Commissioner Daniels asked if he had seen Mr. Wale's comments. Mr. Troche stated, no but the walls would be changed and the structure is set back so as not to block any of his views. Commissioner Daniels asked if there were sidewalks in other places at the entrance. Mr. Troche stated there are no other sidewalks in the development. 8. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Ted Llewelly, 49-825 El Nido, stated he heard about the project from others and spoke with Mr. Wales. He noted the location of his property and stated he was in favor of the project. Moving the gate back will be a benefit and he understands the necessity, but what he is in objection to is the height of the wall. He would like to see the wall raised to attenuate the sound on the rear of his yard and preserve his privacy. The height should be at least seven feet. 9. Mr. Larry Rogelway stated he lives at 44-465 Avenida El Nido, next to Mr. Wales, and he was the civil engineer for the project. Part of this improvement will include construction of the improvements to the entry, sewers, and fixing safety concerns. He has spoken to Mr. Wales and noted he does not live in the house and his concern is that the realtor who sold him his house did not disclose several things when he purchased his house. He had met with Mr. Wales to discuss his concerns and when he left they had reached an agreement on those concerns. 0 3 �...:, G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 9 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 10. Commissioner Quill asked if the wall on Lot 123 was Mr. Llewellyns, or the HOA. Mr. Rogelway stated they had a survey completed and that survey shows the walls are on the property line. Lot 106, has a projection and that owner has agreed to having the wall pushed back to the property line. Each homeowner owns the wall. 11. Mr. Greg Holmes, 48-700 San Dimas, representing the HOA, stated he cannot speak for the Board, but will address the issue with the HOA. He noted there is another manned access on Avenue 50 to accommodate deliveries. 12. There being no further discussion, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 13. Commissioner Quill commended the design and safety features of the gate design. In regard to the wall height, he would hope the HOA would work with the adjacent property owners to achieve the change. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Ladner/Daniels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-045, approving Site Development Permit 2004-810, as recommended: a. Condition added: HOA shall contact the adjacent property owners to raise the wall height to seven feet. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. F. Site Development Permit 2004-808, Conditional Use Permit 96-028 Amendment #1, and Sign Permit 2004-797; a request of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. for consideration of architectural plans for a 1,992 square foot one story building addition and a 960 square foot outdoor equipment storage area on the west side of the store within Specific Plan 96-027, and consideration of a new building sign on the south facade for the property located at 79-900 Highway 1 1 1, the .northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Highway 1 1 1. 1. Staff noted a request had been received from the applicant to continue this item to July 27, 2004. � ,) } i.41 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 10 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 2. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to continue the item to July 27, 2004. Unanimously approved: None. G. Environmental Assessment 2004-505, General Plan Amendment 2004- 101, Zone Change 2004-120, Specific Plan 2004-070, Tentative Tract Map 32070, and Site Development Permit 2004-799; a request of RJT Homes, L.L.C. for consideration of 1) certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact; 2) & 3) Change the General Plan land use and Zoning designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium High Density Residential; 4) "Codorniz" Specific Plan for development standards and design guidelines; 5) The subdivision of 15.16 acres into 145 residential lots; and 6) Five prototype plans for 145 residential units and a clubhouse facility for the property located south of Avenue 52, east of Jefferson Street. 1 . Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Krieger asked about the access points on the northbound section of Jefferson Street. He has a concern about the left turn in crossing on -coming traffic. The other concern is the access on Avenue 52 and the distance from the roundabout. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the driveway on Avenue 52 is a restricted right in and right out only. At this location there will be two lanes eastbound. A study has been requested of the applicant to see if a deceleration lane should be required. This study will also be required on Jefferson Street. The Jefferson Street access is also a right in and right out. It will have a left turn pocket for a left turn in. The City has been using this type of turn pocket on Arterial street throughout the City and it has been successful. 3. Commissioner Daniels asked if the City was reserving the right to close the left turn in. Staff noted that if accidents do occur, the City will evaluate removing the left turn lane. 4. Commissioner Krieger asked if a study was being required for the turning movements. Staff noted only on the deceleration lane. Commissioner Krieger asked if the height of the buildings in a view Corridor exceeded the Code requirements. Assistant City Attorney G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 11 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 Michael Houston stated the General Plan provides that the height limitation be set by the development Code. In this instance, the Specific Plan trumps the Code to the extent the Commission allows. Staff noted there is a 150-foot height limit and there is a small portion of the roof on selected units that exceeds the height limit. Commissioner Krieger asked if the trees exceeding 25 feet will be along Jefferson Street. Staff stated the applicant will need to submit landscaping plans for approval. Commissioner Krieger asked if the retention basins were open. Chairman Kirk noted they are open. Commissioner Krieger asked where the water goes during a 100-year storm. .Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the developer is required to protect property in the event of the 100 year storm. There are instances when the 100 year storm is exceeded and property will be damaged. The emergency overflow route for the most part, the water is passed on to a lower elevation. The City is only required to protect property up to the 100-year flood. 5. Commissioner Ladner asked about the right turn out onto Avenue 52. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the "flyby" lane is not a high speed, but designed for 22 mph. The purpose and the use is to get the traffic over to allow the right turn in. 6. Commissioner Daniels asked if the Commission should look at moving the access further to the east and line it up with the internal circulation of their driveway on Avenue 52. Staff noted that on this project and the apartment complex to the east, there was a shared access. The General Plan has a minimum distance requirement that could be an issue if the two driveways are moved closer to the east property line. 7. Commissioner Quill asked where the two access for this project and the Mountain View project line up. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated there is a commercial development planned for the property to the north. 8. Commissioner Daniels asked if there was an opportunity to move this access further east. Staff stated the General Plan requirement will still need to be maintained. 9. Commissioner Quill stated the shared access with the apartment complex to the east can be required. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated that when the applicant first acquired the property, they wanted to divorce themselves from the shared J Tl G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 12 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 access. It would work better if it were moved further east, but there is a problem meeting the General Plan requirement. Commissioner Quill asked if the main purpose of the second entry was to keep themselves separated from the apartment complex. Staff stated that is staff's interpretation. 10. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Chad Myers, representing the applicant, stated they have reviewed the conditions and have no objections and went on to describe the project. In regard to some of the questions raised about the entrance, this is a secondary entrance and their purpose was to create an architectural design. In regard to the General Plan, they must have 250 feet from the shared access to have a secondary entrance. 11. Commissioner Quill asked the location of the retention basins. Mr. Myers stated they have an above and underground retention basin. 12. Commission Daniels commended the applicant on their fiscal analysis prepared for justification on the zone change and stated it should become a model for all future developments. Second, the access is a concern. Mr. Myers noted they had worked on this issue of the entries and this was the best resolve. Staff noted the apartment complex to the east is in plan check and they have an alternative for the shared access and can omit it. 13. Chairman Kirk asked if this project met the Water Efficiency Ordinance. Mr. Myers stated yes. 14. Mr. Rick New, DJT Architects, architect for the project, gave a presentation on the architecture of the units with Mr. Shane Lekwa, landscape architect for the project. 15. Chairman Kirk asked how people use the pedestrian corridors. Mr. Lekwa stated by development of the courtyards opening out to the pedestrian spine providing access to the pools. Chairman Kirk asked what rooms face the corridor for those homes facing it. Mr. New stated it is the living space. The front door is on the pedestrian alley. 16. Commissioner Quill asked where the visitor parking was located. Mr. Lekwa gave a presentation on the parking locations. The streets are 36-feet in width. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 13 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 17. Commissioner Ladner stated she was concerned there would not be enough parking for guests and especially around the community areas. Mr. Lekwa stated they would look into this, but they have met the overall requirement for parking. 18. Commissioner Quill asked about the parking for the maintenance workers. 19. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. 20. Mr. Robert Crowell, a homeowner in the Citrus Country Club stated his concern of the left turn lane off Jefferson Street and how this would affect the SilverRock project. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the southwest corner will need parking for the Bob Hope Classic. There probably will be a full turn opening. 21. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed. 22. Commissioner Ladner stated parking is a big issue for this type of development. She would prefer the access on Avenue 52 be moved to the shared access. 23. Commissioner Daniels stated he is pleased with the way they have addressed the zoning issues. In regard to the height issues, it is minimal and only a portion of the roof; he has no issue. The only issue he has is the accesses. He would prefer a shared access with the apartment complex or extend the internal driveway with the pavers to move the driveway further east. Lastly, he shares the concern of a left turn off Jefferson Street. If this will create a need for a signal it defeats the purpose of the roundabout. These are product risks the developer must consider. This is a unique project. He would like them to find some additional parking and they will have problems down the road. 24. Commissioner Krieger stated he agrees with Commissioner Daniels. 25. Chairman Kirk stated this is an outstanding product and presentation. He believes it will add to the mix in the community. He would disagree with the parking issues raised. They meet the Code, but when he saw the parking exhibit and on -street parking, he did not think they met the requirement and yet they have met G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 14 8 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 the Code. He does agree that parking for a community facility will be the biggest challenge. He would recommend additional parking spaces be created for these areas. It is nice to see a lot of undergrounding of the flood control facilities. He asked if there would be a commercial project with a market for the commercial site to the north. Staff stated the uses are not known yet. Commissioner Kirk asked if the applicant was concerned with having covered parking to the east. Mr. Myers stated no. Chairman Kirk stated he too would like to see a shared access on Avenue 52 to provide a buffer between the two properties. 26. Commissioner Quill asked that the project be approved with the requirement for a shared access. 27. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Daniels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-046, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-505, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels,, Kirk, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 28. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Daniels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-047, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2004-101, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Kirk, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 29. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Krieger to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-048, recommending approval of Zone Change 2004-120, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Kirk, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 30. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Danielsto adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-049, recommending approval of Specific Plan 2004-070, as amended: 0 11 40ti G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 15 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 a. Condition added: An amendment to the circulation element to reflect the desired change in the access points on the tract map. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Kirk, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 31. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-050, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 32070 as amended: a. Condition added: The applicant shall work with staff to move the Avenue 52 access further east and develop the shared access. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Kirk, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 32. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-051, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2004-799, as amended: a. Condition added: The applicant shall work with staff to move the Avenue 52 access further east and develop the shared access. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Kirk, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Discussion regarding Commission meeting dates to be possibly cancelled. Following discussion, it was determined the Commission would cancel the meeting of August 10, 2004 unless staff determined there was a need for a meeting. 2,�� G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 16 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 B. Review of City Council meeting. IX. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on July 27, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned 9:46 p.m., on July 13, 2004. Respectfully submitted, Bett awyer, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 17 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 27, 2004 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Kirk who asked former Commissioner Jacques Abels to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Rick Daniels, Kay Ladner, and Chairman Tom Kirk. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to excuse Commissioners Krieger and Quill. C. Chairman Kirk presented a Resolution of Recognition to Jacques Abels and thanked him for his years of service on the Planning Commission. D. Staff present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston, Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planners Greg Trousdell and Wallace Nesbit, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: A. Mr. Michael Keebler, a consultant representative from the Coachella Valley Unified School District, stated he will be attending future Commission meetings to speak on matters that pertain to the District. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of the regular meeting of July 13. 2004. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to approve the minutes as submitted. B. Department Report: Planning Manager Oscar Orci gave an update on the revisions to the Highway 111 Design Guideline, procedures and Commissioners' attendance at City Council meetings. r) 0 4.�41 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Continued - Site Development Permit 2004-808, Conditional Use Permit 96-028 Amendment #1, and Sign Permit 2004-797; a request of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. for consideration of architectural plans for a 1,992 square foot one story building addition and a 960 square foot outdoor equipment storage area on the west side of the store within Specific Plan 96-027, and consideration of a new building sign on the south facade for the property located at 79-900 Highway 1 1 1, the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Highway 1 1 1 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff informed the Commission of the change to Condition #6. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Daniels asked if the applicant was aware of the change in conditions. Staff stated yes. 3. Chairman Kirk asked about the performance of the Highway 1 1 1 frontage landscaping. Staff stated it has been an issue for Code Compliance with several of the tenants and staff has not been informed of any issues with Home Depot. 4. Commissioner Daniels asked about the reference to the letter from Mr. Dale Evanson of the Fire Department. Staff stated the Fire Department supplies the City with general conditions and reviews the project during plan check for corrections. 5. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Doug Cooper, representing the applicant, stated they have no objections to the conditions, including the added conditions. 6. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. f) -) G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 2 4. v Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 7. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-052, approving Conditional Use Permit 96-028, Amendment #1, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. 8. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-053, approving Site Development Permit 2004-808, as amended: a. Condition #6: Additional CVWD easement at the existing driveway at the Vista Grande intersection to provide access to the Sewer Lift Station located in the Whitewater Storm Channel right of way as exhibited in the Jefferson Street Widening Phase II — Jefferson Street Right -of -Way Dedication. The aforementioned easement shall be waived if the applicant accepts an offer of payment for such easement in the amount of $3,103 from the City of La Quinta. b. Property Rights add the following: "All above -mentioned right-of-way dedications and/or acceptance of offer shall be made within. 30 days of approval of this site Development Permit. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. 9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Minute Motion 2004-013, approving Sign Permit 2004797, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. B. Continued - Environmental Assessment 2003-480 and Tentative Tract Map 31087; a request of Tahiti Partners V, LLC for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and consideration of a subdivision of ± 5 acres into 10 single-family lots for the property G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 3 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 located on the south side of Darby Road, ± 1 /4 mile east of Washington Street. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff noted changes to the conditions as recommended by the Public Works Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioners Daniels asked about the requirement for a uniform perimeter road. Staff stated it would be located along the property line of Darby Road. Staff is requesting a common architectural design for the wall. 3. Chairman Kirk asked about the Phase I Archaeological Report being remanded. Staff explained the Historical Preservation Commission's reasons for remanding the first report back to the applicant. They were asking that specific issues be discussed in more detail in the report. Commissioner Kirk asked how long this took and did the recommendations change from the first report to the second. Staff stated it was submitted on May 20, 2004 and staff received it back in July, 2004, and no further recommendations were made. 4. Commissioner Daniels noted he thought a development proposal had been reviewed for this site. Staff noted a proposal had been submitted for the area south of this project and it was denied at the Council level. Also, a residential proposal had been proposed for another adjacent area. Staff went on to explain the proposals locations for this entire corner. • 5. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dan Beal, representing the applicant, gave a history of the project. It is their intent to build the site and not develop just the lots. He has reviewed all the conditions including the revisions and has no objections. 6. Chairman Kirk asked why the grading plan did not show any sewer lines. Mr. Beal stated there are no existing sewer lines, but they will flow to Darby Road. They will meet all of CVWD requirements G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 4 l� v J Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 and noted where the existing lines were on the tract map. Chairman Kirk asked the process to have this done as it is not on the map. Staff noted it would be accomplished through the final map process. If it required a redesign of the map, it would be brought back through the approval process. Chairman Kirk asked where the retaining walls would be located. Mr. Beal stated they would be on the eastern boundary and indicated them on the map. Discussion followed. 7. Chairman Kirk asked if the Historic Preservation Commission process caused any unneeded delay. Mr. Beal stated he was surprised, but it was necessary. 8. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-054, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-480, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. 10. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-055, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 31087, as amended: a. Condition #9: The applicant shall offer for dedication on the final map a ten foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. b. Condition #10: The applicant shall retain ownership of all common lot areas to include street landscaping lots and retention basins, unto itself, its heirs, or assignees. C. Condition #67: The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all on -site G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 5 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 improvements, perimeter landscaping on Darby Road and Lot "A", the retention basin and all related appurtenances to include sand filter and landscaping, access drives and sidewalks. The applicant shall create a Homeowners' Association or a Maintenance Association for such continuous and perpetual maintenance. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. C. Environmental Assessment 2004-495 and Tentative Tract Map 31852; a request of Ehline Company for consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and the subdivision of 8.5 acres into 14 single-family lots for the property located at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 52. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Larry Ellison, representing the Ehline Company, stated they had no objections to the conditions as amended. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. John Gamlin, representing The Hideaway, stated his concerns about the street improvements for Avenue 52, screening requirements for the maintenance buildings, as well as the lighting. They would like to ensure they comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance. He also sees no reimbursement condition for the street improvements they have completed. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated the process that would need to be followed to receive what was due them through the Developer Impact Fees. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated that in regard to the landscaping lighting requirements, they will be reviewed during the plan check process in accordance with the conditions. The landscape plans will be brought back for approval. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 6 r) �-� Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 4. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 5. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-056, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-495, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. 6. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-057, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 31852, as amended: a. Condition #13.A.: Avenue 52 and Madison Street (primary Arterial, Option A) — A minimum 20 foot from the R/W-P/L b. Condition #52.A.2.c: 10-foot wide Multi -Use Trail. The applicant shall construct a meandering multi -use trail along the Madison Street frontage within the proposed landscaped setback. Additionally, the applicant's design for the at - grade street crossing of the multi -purpose trail shall incorporate use of surface(s) other than concrete and be approved by the Public Works Department. The location and design of the multi -purpose trail shall also be approved by the Public Works Department. The multi -use trail, trail signs, and the split rail fence shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. D. Street Name Change 2004-018; a request of ND La Quinta Partners for consideration of a street name change from Via Cc to Via Montecito and Via DD to Via Mallorca for streets within The Hideaway located on the east side of Jefferson Street, north of Avenue 54. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 7 " v Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 1 . Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Gamlin, representing ND La Quinta Partners, gave a presentation on the project. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 4. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-058, recommending approval of Street Name Change 2004-018, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. E. Tentative Tract Map 32068; a request of Marvin Investments for certification of the subdivision of four acres into 12 single-family lots for the property located on the south side of Mandarina, west of Pomelo, within the Citrus Country Club. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff noted additional conditions being recommended by the Public Works Department. 2. There being no questions of staff Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Wells Marvin, representing the applicant, stated he was available to answer any questions. He has no objections to the conditions as proposed. He did note the on -site drainage would go to the golf course. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated that the condition could be amended to state that if there was suitable offsite location, it would be allowed. 4.0 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 8 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 3. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 4. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-059, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 32068, as amended: a. Condition #10: Add, "Additionally, the applicant shall not build any structures within ten feet south of the Mandarina Street right-of-way." b. Condition #41: Add, "Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 4-foot landscape planter along the existing service road located south of the tentative tract as a buffer between Lots 6-9 and any CMU wall to be constructed. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Discussion regarding Commission meeting date to be cancelled. Following discussion, it was determined the Commission would cancel the meeting of August 24, 2004. IX. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on August 10, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned 8:06 p.m., on July 27, 2004. Respectfully submitted, et J. er, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 9 Department Report: /.A -r a,4 w l 'F of9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager DATE: August 17, 2004 SUBJECT: Department Report — Response to Public Comments The following public comments were made at the August 3, 2.004, City Council meeting: 1. Marilyn Paige, 80-071 Palm Circle Drive, Westward Ho Golf Course, Indian Springs Country Club, wants the area along Jefferson Street in the Westward Ho community to be kept as a beautification area with walkways and plants. The City Manager informed Council that the item would likely come back to them on August 17, but as a closed session item, as negotiations were still under way. DEPARTMENT REPORT: MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: THOMAS P. GENOVES�� CITY MANAGE DATE: AUGUST 6, 2004 SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 As you are aware, the La Quinta City Council decided to cancel the City Council Meeting of September 7, 2004. 1 respectfully request that the City Council reconsider this action and schedule a meeting for September 7, 2004. 1 anticipate that we will have agenda items that will warrant rescheduling of this meeting. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3 ' A AUGUST 17 CITY COUNCII:S UPCOMING EVENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 26 ANNUAL BOYS & GIRLS CLUB BACK TO SCHOOL PROGRAM & AWARDS LUNCHEON AT SENIOR CEDER -11:30 A.M. SEPTEMBER 7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CANCELLED SEPTEMBER 21 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 23 FIESTA LUNCHEON AT SENIOR CENTER - 11:30 A.M. OCTOBER 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 14 SENIOR CENTER OKTOBERFEST LUNCHEON & CELEBRATION -11:30 A.M. OCTOBER 19 CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 28 ANNUAL HEALTH FAIR AT SENIOR CENTER - 9:00 A.M. NOVEMBER 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 2 ELEC11ON DAY n"ti3 August 2004 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday I- rway z)at ALMdjj_',, 1 2 3 4 5 6 17 6:00 PM CVAG Exec. 2:00 PM City Council 9:00 AM CVAG Human Cmte.- Adolph Meeting Conan. -Osborne 10:00 AM ALRC 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 7:30 AM CVEP-Adolph 7:00 PM Mosquito 9:00 AM RCTC- 6:00 PM League- Abate. -Perkins Henderson Henderson 7:00 PM Planning Commission 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9:00 AM CVA-Henderson 3:00 PM Historic Preser- 2:00 PM City Council vation Commission Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7:00 PM Planning Commis 12:00 PM Sunline-Adolph 9:00 AM LAFCO- sion - CANCELLED 4:00 PM DRRA Airp- Henderson Osborne 29 30 31 July ( September S M T W T F S S M T W T F S E E i j 1 2 3 I j 1 2 3 4 ;( 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ! 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 i 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 j i Creator Plus on 8/11/2004 ,4 �" .. .�ef':.:..c: ::.f.?:•f:;:i p.: i:...c, i:.::•:•;c: ; c...: �.;:.: c:: • :::..:. c::c::.. � :.fr: f . • MIN. i.•if;. :rc x, :c •'ef ':cee: ., ...f:f ::c..c.�c�ef Printed by Calendar September 2004 La Quinta City Council monthly. Planner iav 2 3 4 � ' 10:00 AM ALRC {3 c,f5 { •� }� August `I� 12:00 PM Mayors Lunch 9:00 AM • 4:00 PM SJSR !!:'f fj j illj S M T W T IF S jf�€����I.: ° �• �`j���� �j Ntl. Mnmt-Henderson 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 !�€� 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 {€!I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 g 9 10 11 5 6 7 8 Labor Day 3:00 PM City Council 9:00 AM RCTC- Meeting Cancelled Henderson 9:30 AM Animal Campus- Henderson Patriot Day (CITY HALL - CLOSED) 5:30 PM Investment 12:00 PM Energy/Envi- Advisory Board Sniff 7:00 PM Cultural Arts Commission 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 7:30 AM CVEP-Adolph 7:00 PM Mosquito 3:00 PM Historic Preser- 10:00 AM Pub. Sfty- Abate. -Perkins vation Commission Perkins 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM Transp-Perkins Commission 3:00 PM Mtns. Con -Sniff 6:00 PM League - Henderson 7:00 PM Com. Serv. Comm. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9:00 AM CVA•Henderson 12:00 PM CVAG Human/ 9:00 AM LAFCO- 2:00 PM City Council ConvwOsborne Henderson Meeting 12:00 PM Sunline-Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp- Osborne 1st Day of Autumn 26 27 28 29 30 6:00 PM CVAG-Exec 7:00 PM Planning € October Com-Adolph Commission !I I S M T W T F S 2 j1 j' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 a } €! 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 I 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 I I I! € lfj } € i cflicc'€ •i,c c,f.: •!•• i c, ! • •3n• :: :. F :f .:N Printed by Calendar :.!fi •i c.. {:• .{• : ••.i !. ': cc Creator Plus :.i: •c f3I ' •::.€ on 8/11/2004 October 2004 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 8/11/2004 � `: Department Report: T .104, ti VK1120" ti OF T� TO: DATE: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June S. Greek, City Clerk ,Q August 17, 2004 1)ne SUBJECT: Meeting Schedule for Joint City Council/Commission Meeting The City Council has directed joint meetings to be scheduled, semi-annually with the Planning Commission, and annually with the other City Commissions. Past practice has been to schedule the joint sessions with all of the Commissions on a Tuesday in September. The Planning Commission will have their regular meeting on September 28, 2004. The schedule, utilized in previous years, called for meeting with the Planning Commission and Architectural and Landscape Review Committee in the Study Session Room beginning at 5:00 p.m. prior to the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting. The remainder of the joint meetings was then scheduled in 30 minute increments as follows: 6:45 p.m. Community Services Commission 7:15 p.m. Cultural Arts Commission 7:45 p.m. 15 minute break 8:00 p.m. Historic Preservation Commission 8:30 p.m. Investment Advisory Board If this timetable is Council's preference again this year, staff will make those arrangements on whichever date the City Council selects. 0 1 �., 4. i DEPARTMENT REPORT: Al 4 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety �.�• DATE: August 17, 2004 RE: Monthly Department Report - July 2004 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and garage sale permits for the month of July. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $215,389,157 which represents an issuance of 3,143 building permits through July; • 1,304 animal control cases have been handled through July; • 1,294 code compliance cases have been initiated through July; • $1,150.00 - garage sale permit income in July 4 W d z o 0 LIJLJL-JLJHH"- V�i N Q W ►-► P-. -13 00 W c� w to J O�. H W IM1 Mom+ �i t!1 W W p Vl Pill W � OHO � w W � OJ1 ONo Q O O W 0 V1 O O W CL W C� 00 .01 ►-r C_ w W �W+ 00 to p�0 O�0 th 0 N rA v D �1ill i 1 �G P W O ON 00 J OJO �o W J J *A m W O ON �c w J 00 01 00' J N W N N O t� J W 01 00 J �o J 1.0 00 w owe H H O W N W W W W N W N N p r* C M W to � O� 00 r .O 00 J %%o w O� J �'. �► to to O w ON `O O w O N N w N w w w w C w � a1 N W N J 1%C r-+ �O O W 00 iZ+ 0 ON -P 01 w O � O -P a% N %0 ►-+ ..Q O � O� � N Q to to v LA (A .. v 00 ,. .. O� O000 v � .. ,:... N J O N N �O �-- �O ►- OG to N N y p A ►- J N N �-► W .p N w .� �.-• �..i D W P W W "G � J J * eb \10 W. W W J11.1011.A \011N -9:1, J110011N1100 W 4�6 11 N a\11 W 00 y w OJ 0004 y y rd W ►- �-- W N W O O O N N O� N W J 00 w O to � 00 ►-► C\ �O 00 00 to Q .A O N W 00 C\ W tT O 00 r-+ .Np 00 �--► N O CL A0 O J N J N J N 00 O\ N 00 O Q � - N O O 4 m to th AND 000 � Owl pap..N 00 J �O �► W J �O y pto v00 N �D W O �O LA \O W UON �O tJ1 t!A O\ ►--� �--► ul Ili MMw • M-9 o 0 am owe n' W -3v�cnv�cn7o:Ux1x7rororo3�-+G�MC7C7nnbd;v I > 1 nroro yroMnrn:00Mz�orcnMrn0vM I ro I Hat7H rx bd HnoMM►zj3nzn I to I HOLT7 zz H KQb ytnfntyCyxlro�a�rororo3zG�MC7gzzEy 1 n 1 Ma M M►OHEZMOMMrb�MM?+'CMMMM�t7 3M47MM 1 033 HHnE M33EEr0 �rno0 I �' 1 1 H I I H I C7 c-ItO ronzrraoroozHHx rH 01-4 rr0 00W00�0 t-D nn\H I O 1 b10 V> HHO 1 MLTJ►-a 0Mxo 1 1 00MaH 1 Z I NOD >C zz'tJ CrznnH3 ►-I 33M0 I 1 FQN\ x LAG] yd OOOn3 1 ncnn33zz 1 y I Ooo K M 1 1 G G r > H O r r n I K I H r 0, z 11 m MMr xrz3 M, I rot z \ 0-3 M am I I , M 1 y O Mb En Er) duo rn trr z I I b > tij H H M in 3 I I H H M\ fn O M• Hn zz zH3 zti OHH En I I t" -3 a Q H 0 tij n pa C7 M n] y O x M H r C H M V O M Q z Yy x M M 0 m v0 MM >zn 3tn tnH 3MM z M 1 I z rHH 3 H HH H�yM z I I O H> M d xl > r z H a,z rr nz >r b I I W H H H H r n 1 C I I N t 1 r H to 1 d 0 H 1 I 1 �z I I I >> I I 0 q0 H I I ►1 _ I C V I I I I n 1 H txj I I O I 1 I„3 I I I I t.1 1 I I I I I fS] 1 1 t7opsi ro I>I o 0 M ro t f ro ao x I ro I I > H 3 07 N N \O 1-' FA I ro in H h 1 co N N N Ut m U1 1O O\ 1--a J F-j co H F-' F-' F-j W 1-+ N IP J !-+ I (n 1 1 y U] 'M �-7 I 1 3 M r-. M M In ro 1 ztjroH I ttJ 1 1 H M Y F, I i ro ?O H ON IA h-' I 3 I 1 I tij H F-I N N IA 1--& O H W FJ F j N ON PP. I H I I �o O (n Ip N N W Ul o 01 U1 N N J F-i l0 F✓ M N H w F-+ O O J O , y l W 3 0 H i y I H H n 1 x I ti (n J U] I > H I tj \ w W I b I z hIJ N I� ON 0U1 J N W O W 01W 1 M I YOY W J w W J N O N N N W N OD W W I C ?d 1 fi t'4 IFS b N H W O& o J N IP o f Ol U7 %O IP o Ul N O H I H I C" V �p 0wkowo1WU1JODIPUl0000w0 MwUtM I t"O 1 (1) HC m oo0Nol00&0 Lnvl,Aw0ww0 J%,owJ CC7 I YropCF-+ �p O O O N F 1 ,P N O W O 00 N O O� OD O O O IP N lO �P y' ,� MM [ r) i IzIlH3 H W N I I I y J 0 (n Ln H 1Q H I I I \ z Ut of Ln w to w rn a O to I I I y w H. IP N O Ul U1 Ol J O N F--' OD N 1-4 Ul H Ol N U1 %D N J I 1 rij I K H H b\ K M J O o W O1 Ul %D Ol w J W Ol O& W& W W ,P O1 to 00 O J Ol 00 F 1 lO IP N W N H F-' W %o Ul U1 Ut OD F J H I tij I I M O ro J N k,O Ul O N O O w O J Ul w oN Ut O Ul w U1 N W co o 0 IA W W Ul 1 I I I • I I I I I ro I I O O O M O o O o O o o O O O O O O O o O O O I to 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I rb I I M cn I i H M I 00C)I-I0000o0000000000000 1 H 1 th , 1 > H 1 Iv 0 1 1 ro ty i N I ro I o I C xl J 1 r-1 c 1 1 C 1 000WOooOO0000oo00O000o • 1 H M I I z Y I � I 1 I I I F.I , I I , Isj I I Ol IN O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I I I O O Q W O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o 0 o o I I ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: JULY, 2004 Steve Alexander, Moises Rodarte, and Melissa Wise Animal Pickups YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS YEAR TO YEAR TO July 04 DATE 04 DATE 03 HANDLED DATE 04 DATE 03 Dogs Alive 32 203 238 Bite Reports 7 23 25 Dead 8 52 46 Animal Trap OTI 8 17 27 Set Ups 5 19 52 Cats Alive 10 133 118 Cruelty to Dead 8 41 53 Animals 0 0 3 OTI 0 2 1 Other Animals Alive 9 65 68 Vicious Animal Dead 13 52 39 Restraining 0 5 0 OTI 0 1 1 TOTAL ANIMALS Special Hour Patrols 21 25 9 Alive 51 401 424 Zoning 0 2 8 Dead 29 145 138 Lost/Found 45 283 277 OTI 8 20 29 Animal Rescue 3 9 13 Outside Agency 0 0 5 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED City Reclaims 7 65 98 Other 51 122 119 88 566 591 TOTALS 139 553 609 VIOLATIONS: NO OWNER WARNINGS CITATIONS Dogs at Large 14 0 3 Noise Disturbance 0 0 0 Defecation Removal 0 0 0 License Violation 0 0 9 Other 0 0 8 MONTHLY TOTAL 14 0 20 YEAR TO DATE 120 1 64 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: July 04: 261 July 03: 224 TOTAL YEARLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: July 04: 1304 July 03: 1666 CODE COMPLIANCE STAT REPORT FOR JULY 2004 July 04 YEAR TO DATE 04 YEAR TO DATE 03 ABATEMENTS: Nuisance Abatements Started 118 Weed Abatements Started 6 Vehicle Abatements Started 44 Dwelling Abatements Started 1 TOTAL STARTED 169 TOTAL COMPLETED 140 Case Followups 429 Home Occupation Inspections 10 Business License Inspections 0 Garage Sale Permits Issued 115 Total Received $19150.00 681 881 47 79 551 445 15 8 1294 1413 1222 1163 2548 3191 85 85 1 1 999 1012 5 rj r) 4.. 5 4, DEPARTMENT REPORT: 60 4 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Oscar Orci, Interim Community Development Department 9 Date: August 17, 2004 Subject: Department Report for the Month of July, 2004 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Department Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of July. 1253 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT JULY 2004 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUP'S 1 submitted Cove Checks 7 Inspections completed Development Agreements 0 submitted Environmental Assessments 6 submitted General Plan Amendment 0 submitted Lot Line Adjustments 0 submitted Minor Adjustments 0 submitted MUP's 5 submitted Parcel Maps 1 submitted Parcel Mergers 2 submitted Sign Permits 6 submitted Site Development Permits 3 submitted Specific Plans 0 submitted Subdivision Plan checks 38 performed Tentative Tract Maps 1 submitted TUP's 5 submitted Zone Change 1 submitted Zoning Code Amendments 0 submitted PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTION Westport La Quinta, LP and Project revised- General Plan Amendment and Zone ALRC - 8/4/04 Approved Pacific Retirement Services Change from Low Density Residential to High Density HPC - 8/19/04 EA 2003-470, GPA 2003-091, Residential, and approval to allow a congregate care ZC 2003-112, CUP 2003-074, facility consisting of 237 independent and assisted SDP 2003-762, SP 04-071 living units plus 18 dementia care beds and 20 skilled nursing beds on a 21 acre site located on the northeast corner and southeast corners of Avenue 50 and Washington Street. Tahiti Partners V Request to subdivide 5 acres into 19 single-family HPC - 5/20/04 Continued EA 2003-480, TT 31087 lots, on the south side of Darby Road, A mile east of HPC - 7/15/04 - Approved Washington Street (in the City's Sphere of Influence). PC - 7/27/04 - Approved CC - 8/17/04 Mayer Villa Capri Environmental Assessment and Amendment to the PC - 3/23/04 - Approved EA 2004-498, ZC 2004-1 18, General Plan from CC (Community Commercial) to RL CC - Tabled at applicant's request. GPA 2004-098, TT 32119 (Low Density Residential) for 15.10 acres at the northeast corner of Fred Waring Drive and Washington Street. John R. Dixon Converted SFD to chiropractic office in the Village On hold, pending applicant re- VUP 2003-019 Commercial district at 51-350 Desert Club Drive. submittal with new building. Ehline Company Subdivision of 8.47 acres into 14 lots at the NWC of HPC - 5/20/04 Continued EA 2003=495, TT 31852 Madison Avenue and 52nd Avenue. HPC - 7/15/04 - Approved PC - 7/27/04 - Approved CC - 8/ 17/04 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTION La Quinta Polo Partners Street name change from Beth Circle to Norris Drive PC - 6/22/04 - Approved SNC 2003-015 and addition of new interior street - Old Orchard CC - 7/6/04 - Approved Lane. Hartnett Family 3 lot parcel map located on the east side of Dune Applicant revising map design after TPM 31749 Palms Rd. and south of Westward Ho Drive. meeting with Public Works. KSL Desert Resorts Addition of a 2,400 s.f. maintenance/storage building Incomplete - SP Amendment SDP 2003-794 at an existing golf course maintenance facility for the required. KSL has sold PIQ to CNL. LQ Hotel courses, at 51-001 Carranza. Vince D'Ambra Approval of a Tentative Tract Map for 33 residential PC - 8/10/04 - Approved Santa Rosa Development, LLC lots on 8.08 acres located at the northwest corner of CC - 9/21 /04 EA 2004-502, TT 32225 Madison and Avenue 58 Marvin Investments Approval of a 12 lot single-family dwelling subdivision PC - 7/27/04 - Approved EA 2004-503, TT 32068 on Mandarina Street in the Citrus Development. CC - 8/17/04 James Paul Approval of three commercial office buildings on 2.23 ALRC - 4/7/04 - Approved SDP 2004-804 acres located on the north side of Corporate Centre PC - 5/1 1 /04 - Approved 1 1 1 Venture LLC Drive, approximately 800 feet east of Adams Street. CC - 6/15/04, 7/6/04 - Continued SDP 2004-804 Appeal Appeal of Planning Commission (5/1 1 /04) decision to 7/20 - withdrawn regarding wall built between applicant's property and James Paul's. Choice Enterprise Approval of a 24 lot residential subdivision on ± 7.41 HPC - 4/22/04 - Approved (Arche) EA 2004-504, TT 32201 acres at the northwest corner of Madison & Avenue HPC - 6/17/04 - Approved (Paleo) 60. PC - 6/22/04 - Approved CC - 7/20/04 - Approved D.U.C. Housing Partners, Inc. Approval of 31 single family residential lots located on PC - 7/13/04 - Approved EA 2004-508, TTM 32279 the north side of Avenue 58, approximately 0.4 miles CC - 8/17/04 west of Madison Street V_-) ' L411b C- f PAReports - CC\8-17-04\Monthly Report JULY 2004.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTION Housing Urban Communities - La Approval of a 192-unit affordable family apartment ALRC - 6/2/04 - Approved Quinta Family Apts, L.P. community located at 47-250 Dune Palms Road HPC - 6/17/04 - Approved EA 2003-484, CUP 2003-081, PC - LLA 2003-406, SDP 2003-788 CC - Coral Option I, LLC Subdivide ± 548 acres into 472 residential lots, along PC - 6/8/04 - Approved TT 31681 with a lot for 80 casitas, a recreation and tennis CC - 7/6/04 - Approved facility lot, golf course lots, a commercial lot, and associated miscellaneous lots per Specific Plan 03- 067 and Site Development Permit 03-787. Stonefield Development Subdivide 38.6 acres into 101 s.f. lots at N/W corner PC - 8/10/04 continued to EA 2004-51 1, TT 31874, SP of Monroe and Avenue 53 9/14/04 2004-073 Tetra Tech for ND La Quinta Subdivision of 27.8 acres into 30 lots (29 residential) PC - 6/22/04 - Approved Partners at The Hideaway on Village Club Drive CC - 7/20/04 - Approved TT 32453 Larry D. Sherman Request to change name of Simon Drive to Deputy PC - 7/13/04 - Approved SNC 2004-017 Lee Drive. CC - 8/3/04 - Approved memorial on Highway 1 1 1 Matthew Hladek Approval of development plans for 250 ALRC - 6/2/04 - Approved Watermark Villas condominiums, a clubhouse/restaurant and ancillary PC - 6/22/04 - Approved SDP 2004-809, TT 31798 uses, at the northwest corner of Avenue 52 and CC - 7/6/04 - Approved Jefferson. ND La Quinta Partners, LLC Request to change street names as follows: Via CC PC - 6/22/04 - Approved SNC 2004-018 to Via Montecito and Via DD to Via Mallorca in the PC - 7/27/04 - Approved Hideaway development. CC - 8/7/04 rID PAReports - CC\8-17-04\Monthly Report JULY 2004.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTION Troche Design Request to remodel the existing gatehouse and access ALRC - 7/7/04 - Approved SDP 2004-810 improvements for the La Quinta Golf Estates on PC - 7/13/04 - Approved Coachella Drive between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida El Nido Home Depot USA, Inc. Tool retail center expansion with accompanying large ALRC - 6/2/04 - Approved SDP 2004-808, CUP 96-028, equipment storage area on the west end of the store PC - 7/13/04 - Continued to 7/27 Amendment #1 located at 79-900 Highway 1 1 1. PC - 7/27/04 -Approved RJT Homes - "Codorniz" Approval for a 145 unit multi -family development PC - 7/13/04 - Approved EA 2004-505, GPA 2004-101, located at the southeast corner of Jefferson Street CC - 8/3/04 - Approved ZC 2004-120, SP 2004-070, and Avenue 52. Requesting Zone Change from TTM 32072,SDP 2004-799 Neighborhood Commercial to Medium High Density. City of La Quinta, ZOA 2002-074 Review of City Lighting Ordinance update. Pending City of La Quinta Amend various sections of the City Municipal Code On going Zoning Text Corrections (Noise). RFP - Regional Commercial Highway 1 1 1 Design Guidelines Scheduling interviews with top Guidelines three firms Verizon, EA 2004-512, CUP Wireless telecommunication facility to be located at PC - 8/10/04 - Approved 2004-084, the southwest corner of 48t' Avenue and Jefferson Street (i.e., IID Substation) EA 2004-518, CUP 2004-085 Wireless stealth (Monopalm) telecommunication ALRC - 9/1 /04 Nextel facility to be located at the southwest corner of 54" PC - 9/14/04 Avenue and . Madison Street (Fire Station 70) Ehline, TT 32371, EA 2004-510 Subdivision of 8.99 acres, divided into 54 lots for PC - 8/10/04 Continued to 9/14 residential purposes to be located at the southeast corner of Washington and Miles Avenue (Center Pointe) PAReports - CC\8-17-04\Monthly Report JULY 2004.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTION Robert Schumacher, EA 2004- Subdivide ± 110 acres into 392 single-family lots HPC - 8/19/04 513, SP 2004-072, TTM 32398 ranging in size between 6,000 and 10,300 square PC - 9/14/04 feet, one 10 acre Neighborhood Commercial lot, and CC - 10/5/04 miscellaneous lots located at the northeast corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 60. Hanson/Kelly 2 story commercial office building (6,354 sq. ft.) on ALRC - 8-4-04 - Approved VUP 2004-024 .4 acres located at the southwest corner of Desert HPC - 8-19-04 Club and Calle Barcelona PC - 9-14-04 City of La Quinta A transportation plan , as defined by state legislation, Contract proposal to Golf Cart Plan to implement Golf Cart paths and routes complete plan City of La Quinta State mandated General Plan Housing Element HCD 3" review Housing Element Boureston 42,000 square foot medical office building located at ALRC - 9/1 /04 EA 2004-516, SDP 2004-81 1 Caleo Bay, Lake La Quinta Drive and Washington PC - 9/14/04 Street Village Builders 98 Subdivision of 4.54 acres into 40 single-family PC - 9/14/04 EA 2004-515, TTM 32742, ZC residential lots with private streets to be located at CC - 10/5/04 2004-121 55-101 Monroe Street (SWC Avenue 55 and Monroe Street) Chick-Fil-A Construction of a 4,545 square foot drive-thru Chik- In process SDP 2004-812 Fil-A restaurant with 143 seats plus 20 patio seats to be located on Pad 2 in the Pavillion Shopping Center Jack Tarr Subdivision of lots for ownership purposes (i.e., retail/ Pending additional TPM 32683 commercial business) - Washington Square project information Desert Cheyenne, Inc. 201 single-family homes to be located at the In process SDP 2004-813 southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Monroe Street ro ­4 t P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\Monthly Report JULY 2004.doc CID SPECIAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT Consultant Project Contract Amount % Completed to Date Schedule Date Start Completion Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC AB 939 $58,000 5% 7/1 /04 6/30/05 Planning Center General Plan Housing Element $36,475 95% 8/26/99 8/15/04 Benya Lighting Update City's Outdoor Ordinance and Dark Sky Ordinance $18,000 + travel expenses 80% 6/1 /02 5/1 /03 00 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\Monthly Report JULY 2004.doc 8 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 10 G OF 'T9 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CONNCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECT DATE: AUGUST 1.7, 2004 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY. SERVICES ' DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2004 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2004: Sept. 2 *Beginning and Advanced Ceramic Art Classes Sept. 7 *Beginning session for Golden Tones Vocal Group Sept. 7 *Beginners' Arthritis Tai Chi Class Sept. 7 *Knitting Class Sept. 9 *Ballroom Dance Workshop Sept. 10 *Adult CPR & First Aid Class Sept. 13 *Hatha Yoga Class Sept. 13 Tap & Movement Dance Class, La Quinta High School Sept. 13 Classic/Latin Ballroom Dance, La Quinta High School Sept. 13 Mat Pilates, La Quinta High School Sept. 13 Beginning Line Dance, La Quinta High School Sept. 13 Tap & Jazz Dance Class, La Quinta High School Sept. 13 Hip Hop Dance Class, La Quinta High School Sept. 13 Microsoft Word, Senior Center Sept. 14 *AARP Driver Safety Program Sept. 14 *Free HI -Cap Counseling Sept. 14 *Drama Class Sept. 14 *Watercolor Class Sept. 14 Adobe Photoshop Elements Advanced Course, Senior Center Sept. 14 Mindful Hatha Yoga, Senior Center Sept. 14 Beginning Guitar, Senior Center Septa 14 Italian for Travelers, Senior Center. Sept. 14 Hip Hop Dance Ages 7-12 years, La Quinta High School Sept. 14 Drill, Dance, & Spirit Squad, La Quinta High School Sept. 15 *Sketching/ Drawing Class Sept. 15 Sharpen Your Defense Skills, Senior Center Sept. 15 Earn Self Defense Certifications, Senior Center Sept. 15 Hatha Yoga, Senior Center Sept. 16 *Free Medicare and Insurance Counseling Sept. 16 Fainting for Kids, Senior Center Sept. 1.6 Adobe Photoshop Elements, Senior Center Sept. 16 Dance, Play & Pretend (Pre -ballet), La Quinta High School Sept. 16 Beginning Ballet, La Quinta High School Sept. 16 Linoleum Block Printing, Senior Center Sept. 16 All Aspects of Interior Design, Senior Center Sept. 16 A Life Worth Writing -Yours, Senior Center Sept. 17 *Pilates Class Sept. 19 *UBS Financial Services Inc. Senior Seminar Sept. 20 *Creative Writing Class Sept. 20 Skateboarding Lessons, Fritz Burns Park Skate Park Sept. 20 Ballet Barre Workout, La Quinta High School Sept. 21 *Free Hearing Consultations Sept. 21 *Tai Chi Sept. 21 Belly Dancing, La Quinta High School Sept. 21 Beginning Watercolor Class, Senior Center Sept. 22 Beginning Drawing Class, Senior Center Sept. 22 How to Eat, Move & Be. Healthy, Senior Center Sept. 22 Beginning Computers, Senior Center Sept. 23 Belly Dancing, La Quinta High School Sept. 23 *Fiesta Luncheon Sept. 30 *Free Legal Counseling *Daytime Senior Center class or activity 00 Monthly & Yearly Revenue for the Month of July 2004 Qavanua _ 19SAINU Rantalit 20" 2003 Variance Senior Center $ ,085.00 $ 900.00 $ 4,185.00 Parks $ $ ' Monthly Facility Revenue $ 5,085.00 $ 900.00 $ 4,185.00 Year to Date Facility Revenue $ 5 085.00 $ 900.00 ,$ 4185.00 Monthl Revenue Senior Center $ 4,877.00 $ 4,173.75 $ 703.25 Communfty Services $ 1 9,328.00 $ 8,294.00 $ 1,034.00 Total Revenue $ 14,205.00 $ 12 467.75- $ 1,737.25 Qa%#m&niam Vojor fn rIAfA ■ \v ,W v..V•v ■ - Senior Center $ 4,877.00 $ 4,173.75 $ 703.25 Community Services $ 9,328.00 $ 8,294.00 $ 1,034.00 Total Revenue to Date $ 14,205.Q0 $ 12,467.75 $ 1,737.25 003 �.t1� Community Services. Department Attendance Report for the Month -of July 2004 Summary Sheet Program 20" 2003 Variance Sessions Per Month 2004 2003 Leisure Classes 1491 34 115 59 11 Special Events 639 613 26 28 29 Adult Sports 338 295 43 23 23 Senior Center 781 728 53 96 84 Total 1,907 119670 237 206 147 Senior Services Senior Center 426 456 -30 19 21 Total 426 456 -30 19 21 Sports User Groups Sports Complex Use LQ Sports & Youth 900 800 100 10 10 La Quinta Park Use Desert Storm Soccer Club 14 0 14 13. 0 Diamond Ringers Softball Club 1*5 0 15 4 0 AYSO 50 0 50 4 0 Facility/Park Rentals Senior Center Private Pa 150 45 . 110 1 1 Church 300 220 80 4 4 LO Community Park Private Party) 200 0 200 1 0 Total 1 629 1 0" 569 37 1 b Total Programs 3 962 3191 776 2621 183 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 138 275 7 Total Volunteer Hours 138 275 7 E-1 1904 Community Services Program Report for July 2004 'IrVu 9nn� 2004 2003 Participants Participants. Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Beginning Computers 9 7 2 4 2 Hatha Yoga 14 13 1 6 2 Latin Classic Ballroom 11 6 5 3 1 All Aspects of Interior Design 10 0 10 4 0 Cartoonins for Kids 16 0 16 4 0 Tap & Jazz Combo 3 0 3 2 0 Beginning Belly Dance 12 0 12 4 0 Intermediate Belly Dance 4 0 4 3 0 Mat Pilates 3 0 3 6 0 Classic/Latin Ballroom Dancing 11 0 11 3 0 Yoga Somatica 7 0 7 3 0 Hip Hop 10 0 10 2 0 Beginning Guitar 15 0 15 3 0 Beginning Ballet 14 0 14 2 0 Pre -Ballet 4 0 4 4 0 Adobe Photoshop 4 0 4 3 0 Adobe Photoshop Advanced 21 0 2 3 0 Totals 1491 261 123 59 5 2WA 2003 2004 2003 Participants Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Special Events Summer Day Camp 307 306 1 21 22 Desert Willow Golf Course 50 53 -3 1 1 Westin Mission Hills 55 58 -3 1 1 Marriott's Shadow Ride 52 43 9 1 1 Trilogy Golf Course 42 66 -24 1 1 Indian Wells Country Club 48 0 48 1 1 Pageant of the Masters Excursion 35 24 11 1 1 Ocean Festival Excursion Sol 50 0 1 1 Totals 091 6WI 391 281 29 200A 2003 2004 2003 Participants Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Adult,Sports I Open Gym Basketball 238 220 18 21 22 Adult Soccer, Championship Game 100 75 25 1 1 Totals 338 295 43 231 23 Recreation Totals I 11"1 9211 1101 = 57 Page 2 Senior Center Attendance ParticipatfoR Partleleation -Varlance Meetings Meetings Senior Activities ACBL Bride 128 14 114 4 5 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 294 338 -44 16 14 Monthly Luncheon 64 89 -25 1 1 Movie Time 72 66 6 9 9 Senior Activity Total 558 507. 51 30 29 Senior Leisure Classes Ballroom Dance 33 26 7 10 5 Ceramics 8. 10 -2 3 5 Computer 26 26 0 8 6 Computer Tutor 1 1 0 1 1 Exercise 41 48 -7 10 12 Pilates 9 .0 9 5 0 Quiltin 25 35 -10 5 5 Sketching/DrawingSketching/Drawing 11 5 6 4.. 4 Tai Chi 32 21 11 8 6 Watercolor 14 13 1 4 4 Woodcarving 16 18 -2 5 3 Yoga 7 18 -11 3 4 Senior Leisure Classes Totat 223 221 2 66 55 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 781 728 53 96 84 Senior Services AARP "55" Course 32 29 3 2 2 FIND Food Distribution 301 290 11 5 4 *I.I.D. Energy Assistance 64 82 -18 6 8 I.I.D... Energy Assistance/No fee 6 8 -2 3 4 Legal Consultation 7 0 7 1 0 Medicare/Hi Cap. Consultation 6 4 2 2 3 Volunteers, 10 43 -33 n/a n/a TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 426 456 -30 19 21 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 1207 1184 23 1151 105 tOG DEPARTMENT REPORT: ti5 OF Tl'9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Timothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: August 17, 2004 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for July 2004 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update; 4. Monthly Summary of Public Works Tasks; Climrothy$Vion nrbliWoroc ks Dict/City Engineer r W Z Q 5 CL C! G �Y LL 00 V J IL � o H N co) W w _ f � c a pp xg K fl-m y pp i z RIO A PQ �ay� iv R 9G �aci�. R215 Pill 6� Air Y E g rt r€ U) �a �z �w U) _ J Q Z U 2w W I-666600000 O O O O O O O O O V- W T- o � ccoo�N V JMM J 6H Ef} M� 6464 �N10 64 64% V.- 0 w LL J H O F- H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z O O O O O O O O O Off?dam' Co69 N v- V Q M6 R � � 01 6R6Q � W W U. W N N Z O Q H z z w wU w z co > (� w w OW oz a m z2 gg 0 coJ Lu Lu p ~WWnF-2 �jA -jP Cl)Q ' w 3. (j ct Q o.:)Oa.2Oo u),- O N J D n U) ui }�U W � Y �U w = U F- z og Ma $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0$ o 0 o$ 0 o 0 g$ p0 Z 0000000000000000po 00 b4 i9 69 i9 i9 EA i9 0 O � � 0o 69 E9 O 0 v. i9 c0 a �80000 iR :FT fls ils 6 N Q CM Iii W W LL Y V W 0 z g a� F- w0 0 QQ W W WcF-ncZZ F- W nF-� W» » J W w W }�Y=�� ggQQ W ?aaO°° W 0QQaQF— W Q�� z ....� ���z°O Cl)WW oQCl)°-w�WouSwwa/ U.Qcncn»gF-F-wY �mg<lxoo��woozwOW ==iiYaW=i=�ccf) 2M 22U-.�U~f-H j F- XW y N w w � g w a Q Q N O it O It a Q O UU O g F-a U) Cl) �zd Cl) cf) co >- Q F- (1) W U — U)� ZN WW UU m > s p a 2 N CO)O i H V v 0 o _ Z Z LL Z Z v Z 0 0 W Z a o z a o o a Z W p U a a z Z W a U U v � a � i a a N , 0 w � Z � � � o ��QQ � o � Q � W � Q � � Q z gW cn n a z i-- i-- a s CL �z F- f- Cl)cn U) 0-(D o=- F- w ILP w W W N O w a a Cl)�F- Cl) Cl) 0 V! �� r� r� ti ti r� ti n ti ti ti �• �� � ti� � � W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 ") M� 4 (- i C.)OO(a0) c 4-J i wnc 06 p co CV5 O�0)•��o�C.)flQC 0NUO0��r��ac�'-r0N c . � N�cc�o �ONO\OO�.p•p�pOLccO>, OOOM0O��'m.p����•0+QNcN�._I + \�°Q�OO��• Up'pGm•m�!•�� VCOOfpm~YQ71CC1/ 1— U a d yVHaOaJQaQC O Otl0O •''.00c�L__o 1cc 0 - LU + 0 UCS E�Cn C.)�> aD N F" �n O O CWF-Lo O co cn j nv) nEcy CO MlNcpC Z .0 F_ON =0)0)Z co4- J qt O AWcoL°a_JQL N. J Zv Z W coco N W z L ° oo O irn o O aWCV)O ��WHMC D N �� z ui F— 't �M N 0 z a)U)N a)z0 UCf) C 0)zc0O �C CcO E LZz7C 'M �0.4-1 0 Q�o C ,? O O'0OO p0cnpWp 6 � � ZE EZ CEZcoZZ.� CcLUaU�V �aa..0�V `C)CN C 0 N a �sc° oOo+•�aicv c N+�oN�o� + C)1CLLa.N 0-n Q W (n a.Q�� U .a � O G O > U 'o CLo � s � co a o O m Co � C > ~ o. o ° C O U U a Cw +r 0 C) O C U U S N cn O m O Q rn rn c o w .a .� !Eai a Z O_ O H' C N U m ~ Z cc N O O p U cn L C7 0 a E w y O cn O O W O O (� LD O m C co O O O +r N C F- C M L' C � N N Lr) E W U N O O> O 4- aD "' > O 0 a > MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PUBLIC WORK TASKS MONTH OF: July, 2004 Code 1000 1001 1002 1003 Employee's Hourly Labor Breakdown Activi Policing/Inspection Pot Hole -Re air/Patchin Crack/Joint Repair Pavement Marking/Legends Pavement Marking/Striping Curb Painting Other Traffic Controls Curb 8 Gutter Re air/Const. Other Concrete Re airs/Const. Street Sign Install (New) Street Sign Repair/Maint Debris Removal Ri ht of WayMaint. CLEAN Catch Basin Inlet/Outlet Rondo Channel OutletlVault Desert Club Outlet/Vault Retention Basins Repair/Maint. Gutter/Median Sand Removal Street Sweeping ( Machine) Street Sweeping (Hand) Sidewalk/Bike Path Cleaning Dust Control Flood Control Parks/Retention Basins Inspection/Clean Crew#1 3 Men 31 9 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 2 4 14 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Crew #2 2 Men 7 7 18 0 0 0 1 0 8 6 64 8 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Crew #3 3 Men 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 11 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 90 Maint. M . 1 Man 11 1 0 0 0 0 1 0-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 49 17 18 0 0 0 10 0 16 14 78 10 8 25 0 0 57 1 126 0 0 0 0 117 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1021 1022 1022A 0023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 i1 029 1031 1041 1051 1052 1061 1062 1063 1081 1082 1683 1084 Mowing/Weeding, Shrubs & Tree Trimmin LandscapeArri ation Contract Mana eme Li htin Electrical Contract Mana ement Small Tools Repair/Maint. Equipment Repair/Maint. Vehicle Repair Maint. Trash/Litter/Rec cable Removal Vandalism Repairs Graffiti Removal Maint. Yard Building Maint. Seminars/Training2 Special Events Citizen Com taints/Re uests Meeting Office ( Phone, paper work, reports, Misc.) SUBTOTAL 3 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 54 27 0 44 3 18 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 2 5 5 208 4 108 0 0 0 5 2 0 23 5 0 0 13 11 0 408 0 13 11 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 16 0 0 22 37 126 7 121 11 0 0 35 3 2 87 32 18 0 59 41 60 1022 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1091 1094 Over Time Jury Duty () Sick Leave Vacation Holiday AWOP Bereavement SUBTOTAL TOTAL HOURS TOTAL MILES 9 0 0 176 24 0 0 209 489 1354 0 0 24 60 16 12 0 112 320 9951 7 0 24 24 24 0 0 79 487 1938 0 0 2 24 8 0 0 34 160 2421 16 0 50 84 272 72 12 0 434 1456 4529 Q 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 v f� DEPARTMENT REPORT: CITY OF LA Q UINTA POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHL Y REPORT Duty 2004 City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain John Horton, Commanding July, 2004 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Thursdav, 07-01-04 (63): Deputy Hendry arrested Jeremiah Lowe B/M/A on the 56000 block of Rivera, PGA West Country Club for grand theft of a Men's Rolex gold watch. Hendry conducted an investigation and located the watch in a Dorito's bag hidden in a co -worker's vehicle. Deputy Hendry was able to get a statement from Lowe admitting to taking the watch. Booked into Indio Jail. 2025 hours, Deputy Krachman arrested Jamin Brent Sims for public intoxication at the 51000 block of Eisenhower Drive, in La Quinta. There was a rape call on the 46000 block of Dune Palms. The female victim said her mom's boyfriend, Porfirio Almanza, has been raping and sodomizing her for the past two years. Victim is developmentally disabled and submitted to a rape kit. Case forwarded to Investigations. Friday. 07-02-04 (68): Deputy Harter arrested Pablo Hernandez Sauceda, 52,of La Quinta, for spousal abuse. His wife contacted Cathedral City Police in reference to being repeatedly struck in the face by her husband while driving from La Quinta to Cathedral City. Victim, Francis Sauceda, 47, was being treated for facial lacerations and contusions at Desert Hospital. Both were uncooperative. 1927 hours, Deputies Ortega and Krachman responded to a report of a disoriented female parked in the 78000 block of La Palma. Upon arrival, they made contact with Teresa Eddy Freeberg of Palm Desert. She had a warrant for her arrest for Palm Desert Municipal Code violations and was cited and released to her husband. Saturday, 07-03-04 (75): 2214hours, Deputy Gaunt arrested Antonio Challia, for D.U.I. His bac was .07/.06. The stop was at Ave 48 and Washington. Sundav, 07-04-04 (741 Deputy Reynolds responded to La Quinta Resort in reference to a domestic dispute and a report of a subject kicking in the door. No damage to door and argument verbal only, however Jeffrey McKean, 34, of Lomita was arrested for public intoxication. Deputy Hernandez responded to a medical aid on the 78000 block of Villleta Dr in La Quinta. Nora Rothschild, 50, had been on the phone with her friend when she collapsed. Her nine -year -old daughter, was present and picked up the phone. The other party on the phone directed her to hang up and call 911, which she did. Mother had open-heart surgery a year ago and has been in ill health, she was transported but pronounced dead at JFK. We called in TIPS and CPS, we were able to locate a paternal uncle who lives in La Quinta. Father of child lives in Memphis, we also contacted Nora's mother in Memphis. Deputy Reynolds responded to Target in reference to a shoplifter. The suspects took four DVD's and left in a blue Ford F-150. A half-hour later he located the truck parked in the Wal-Mart parking lot. Reynolds and Sgt. Allen staked out the vehicle until the suspects returned and found out that they had also stolen numerous DVD's, a paint ball gun and accessories. The stolen property from Target was also recovered. Reynolds arrested them for burglary and receiving stolen property. The suspects were husband and wife, Jose Heraz and Angelica Heraz. Monday, 07-05-04 (57): On July 5, 2004, at about 4:26 a.m., Deputy Donivan was called to the 52400 block of Avenida Obregon in reference to a shooting. He arrived at 4:41 am and located a 17-year-old juvenile that had been shot in the back. The victim is a possible "JT" gang member. The victim was treated at the location and immediately taken to a local hospital were he died as a result from his injuries. The juvenile did not live at the location. He was visiting with family members. The name of the victim is being withheld until the next of kin is notified. The Riverside County Sheriffs Department Central Homicide Unit along with Investigators from the Indio Station were dispatched to the Avenida Obregon address to investigate this incident. The Sheriffs Department is looking for a small green compact car with black bumpers that was seen leaving the area. Lt. Walker as well as Sgt. Taylor from Central Homicide Unit were notified of the incident and they responded to the scene. Deputy Donvian was sprayed with some of the victim's blood while performing CPR. Tuesday, 07-06-04 (55): At approx. 1630 hours and off duty C.H.P Officer observed a grab and run at the Ross Department store that met the criteria for commercial burglary. The off duty officer directed Deputies as he followed the suspects in a stolen vehicle. The officer lost sight of the suspect vehicle and a search of the area where he last saw the vehicle was unsuccessful. The stolen vehicle was later located and recovered by the Palm Desert Station and two suspects were arrested. The stolen property from the Ross Department store was also recovered, but The Ross Department refused to press charges. Wednesday, 07-07-04 (52): 0630 hours - Deputy Alfaro investigated an unattended death at the 79000 block of Horizon Palms, La Quinta. Robert James Schaus (52 years old) was found slumped over in his bed by a family member around 0630 hours. Robert was disabled and in poor health. According to a family member, in 1986 Schaus was injected with mercury in an attempt to poison him and his health never improved. Sgt. McManus responded as well as Dep. Coroner Sandoval. Death is possibly an overdose from various medications he had been taking. Sent to investigations for follow up. 1900 hours - Deputy Dusek investigated a lewd acts with a child case that occurred on the 54000 block of Avenida Juarez, in La Quinta. The 13-year old victim alleged that her ex -stepfather molested and photographed her the night before at his home. The victim was able to leave the residence and dialed 911. She was brought to the station and notifications were made to Lt. Walker and Sgt. McManus. While at the station awaiting Investigator Harwood's arrival, the stepfather arrived at the station. He was later identified as Jesse Lange. Lange was advised of the allegations and he initially consented but later refused a search of his residence. Deputies secured Lange's residence and vehicle for the purpose of obtaining a search warrant since it appeared he might attempt to destroy evidence. Investigator Harwood arrived at the station and assumed the investigation. A search warrant is being written at this time and the medical examination has been conducted. Investigations to take over the case. Thursday, 07-08-04 (63): No significant activity to report. Friday, 07-09-04 (74): No significant activity to report. Saturday, 07-10-04 (51): No significant activity to report. Sunday, 07-11-04 (43): Deputy Hernandez arrested Billy Ray Messemore, 58, Indio, for burglary at one of the houses on Jefferson being torn down by the city. Messemore was taking metal from the homes. Monday, 07-12-04 (63): 0035-Deputy Orr responded to La Quinta High School in reference to a burglary in progress. The Desert Sands School security had one male juvenile detained, two other male subjects ran from the area. Deputy Orr arrived and met with the security officer According to the security officer, upon his arrival he saw two subjects burning an American flag outside one of the classrooms. He confronted the individuals and they ran from the area. He managed to detain a 15-year-old male juvenile (of La Quinta) that was still inside the classroom. Further investigation reveled that the juvenile's older brother, Max Krakoff 18 years old was also involved. Max was contacted at his house and arrested for burglary, arson and receiving stolen property. The juveniie was released to his mother. Charges of burglary and receiving stolen property will be filed on him out of custody. Max was booked into the Indio Jail. Third suspect is also believed to be a juvenile. Tuesday, 07-13-04 (59): 1000 hours- Deputy Brooker responded to an unattended death at the 78000 block of Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta. Shiged Akita (82 years) was found deceased by a friend who regularly takes him to the store. Akita apparently died of natural causes. Wednesday, 07-14-04 (66): 1120 hours - Deputy Brooker handled a rape where a 26-year old female claimed she was date -raped by a 36-year-old male named Blaine Frederick. The two had dinner at his house in the PGA West C.C. and the victim remembers consuming two alcoholic beverages. The next thing she remembers, she was waking up with no clothes on. She confronted Frederick who stated they had consensual sex. Deputy Brooker contacted her at JFK and requested an immediate blood draw and urine sample for drugs. Detective Quintero is continuing with the investigation. Thursday, 07-15-04 (65): 0300 hours - Deputies responded to the 50000 block of E1 Dorado Dr. inside the Mountain View C.C. in reference to a burglary. The investigation revealed that the suspect(s) gained entry to the residence by throwing a large pick -axe through a window at the rear of the residence. The suspects then took a purse from the kitchen counter and fled the area. Deputy White was within the country club when the call came out and was 97 within one minute. Deputies checked the area but were unable to locate the suspect. Friday, 07-16-04 (54): 2354 hours - Deputy Moore responded to 78271 Hwy 111 (Vons) in reference to three Hispanic males that stole several 30 packs of beer from the location. An employee witnessed the theft and was able to provided a description of the suspect and part of the license plate of their vehicle. Sgt. Pina checked the cove area and located the vehicle, a blue Chrysler mini -van. Deputies converged on the location, on the 52000 block of Avenida Rubio and detained 10 Hispanic males. The witness was transported to the scene and a field line-up was conducted. The witness identified two of the suspects. The third suspect was identified after reviewing the surveillance tape. Jason Morales and Moises Ramirez were booked at the Indio Jail for burglary. The sixteen -year -old juvenile was release to his parents. 1000 hour- Dep. Brooker responded to 79405 SR 111, "Canton Bistro", in reference to a past attempt burglary. He located a 16 inch hole in the air duct on the roof leading to the kitchen. There was no entry into the business. Saturday, 07-17-04 (60): 2038 hours-Dep. Gaunt arrested John Brasstrelo, for possession of stolen property. 2222 hours, Deputy Krachman handled an unattended death on the 78000 block of Alden Circle, in La Quinta. The decedent, Michael Desi Aragon was found deceased by his wife. Mr. Aragon had a terminal brain tumor and was seeing a doctor prior to his death. The body was examined and no signs of foul play were noticed. The coroner's office released the body to the mortuary. T.I.P was called to provide counseling. Sunday. 07-18-04 (54): 0400 hours- Dep. Guant handled a vehicle accident located at Avenida Bermudas and Avenue 52. The car struck a palm tree in the center median. The driver, Desiree Solorio, sustained minor injuries, but declined medical treatment. 2008 hours- Dep. Vanderhoof responded to the 53000 block of Avenida Velasco in reference to a 5150 WIC. He contacted Michael Robert Larson, at the residence. Dep. Vanderhoof found the subject to be a danger to himself. The subject was transported to JFK due to medical reasons. The subject was at JFK until 0500 hours. Dep. Harter transported Larson to Desert Hospital for the 5150 WIC admit. Monday, 07-19-04 (60): 0400 hours- Dep. Orr arrested Eddie Patino, at the 50000 block of Washington for an outstanding misdemeanor warrant. Tuesday. 07-20-04 (64): 1230 hours - Deputy Hernandez arrested Vidrio Monico for burglary during a burglary investigation on the 51000 block of Eisenhower Dr. Deputy Hernandez' investigation revealed that a witness observed Monico tampering with a coin operated washing machine at the location in an attempt to steal money from the coin box. During the investigation, Monico exited an apartment and surrendered to Deputy Hernandez. Monico was booked into the Indio Jail. 1900 hours - La Quinta Set team members attempted to serve a felony warrant on Michael Bruce Banwer (46 years) at The Falls Restaurant in La Quinta. Banwer, a Manager at restaurant, saw them enter and fled out the side door. After a brief search, Banwer was located across the street hiding behind a block wall near Von's. Banwer was taken into custody without incident. The info on the warrant was obtained via PSPD. Banwer's warrant was for registration of sex offenders. Wednesday, 07-21-04 (47): No significant activity to report. Thursday, 07-22-04 (62): 0820 hours - Deputy Celaya arrested Jackie Ramirez for possession of a controlled substance and possession of paraphernalia, after responding to the area of Ave. 47 and Washington St. in reference to a report of a man down. Ramirez was found sleeping in his vehicle. During a consent search, Ramirez was found in possession of 1.0 gram of methamphetamine and a glass pipe. Ramirez was booked into the Indio Jail. Friday, 07-23-04 (49): No significant activity to report. Saturdav, 07-24-04 51 1725 hours, Corporal Contreras arrested two subjects at the Target Department Store in La Quinta. The first suspect was identified as Roman Barilla for grand theft. Bariila attempted to steal over $400.00 of compact discs. He also arrested Gilbert Perez, 20 years, for possession of a controlled substance and possession of paraphernalia. Sundav, 07-25-04 (52): 0307 hours- Dep. Michaels handled an assault with a deadly weapon investigation on the 54000 block of Avenida Vallejo in the City of La Quinta. The victim, Buster Parsons, said Eddie Foulger, pointed a gun at him during an argument. The suspect was gone upon arrival and an APR was sent out to surrounding agencies. Cpl. Michaels said this is an on going problem per the victim. 1310 hours- Dep. Reynolds handled a minor injury crash at Fred Waring and Dune Palms. A single Jeep Cherokee was eastbound, drifted off the road and sideswiped a power pole, which sent the vehicle into a tree, and finally deflected from the tree onto the street. The vehicle was totaled and the driver was out of the car when Deputies Hernandez and Reynolds arrived. The man identified as Derrick Battles, 25 yrs, was caring for his 9-month-old child, who had a small cut on the lip. Very little bleeding, but taken to Desert for further evaluation. Battles told deputies that he fell asleep and had smoked a joint earlier this morning. The deputies summon the blood nurse for a blood draw at Desert Hospital where he was treated and released. Case to be filed out of custody for driving under the influence of marijuana or other drugs. 1829 hours, Corporal Michaels cited and released Charles Raymond Kingston for a warrant for being under the influence of a controlled substance and violation of a court order during a ped check at the AMPM Washington and Channel Drive, in La Quinta. Monday, 07-26-04 (49): 0510 hours- Dep. Harter handled a window smash burglary at Pizza Hut located at 50855 Washington. Suspect(s) threw a rock through the glass door and made entry. The suspect(s) took the cash drawer and fled. The manager said there should not have been any cash in the drawer. (Palm Desert Station handled a similar 459 P.C. to NY Pizza off Washington earlier that morning) 2129 hours Deputy Pierce arrested Edward Drost for driving under the influence during a vehicle enforcement stop at Calle Tampico and Desert Club, in La Quinta. Tuesday, 07-27-04 (62): 1732 hours, Deputy Bianco arrested Douglas Kar Nichol] for driving under the influence of alcohol during a vehicle enforcement stop at Washington Street and Avenue 50, in La Quinta. Wednesday, 07-28-04 (51): 0430 hours- Dep. Orr responded to a burglary that just occurred on the 78000 block of Calle Las Rambles inside the Duna Country Club. The suspect(s) threw two large rocks through the rear glass slider. The suspect(s) then grabbed several items of clothing from the kitchen counter. The suspect(s) dropped one bag as they left the area. The house sits along the golf course. The responding units set up a perimeter, but were unable to locate the suspect(s). 2100 hours - Deputy Alfaro arrested a 17 year -old male for possession for sales of methamphetamines during a vehicle stop at Washington St. and Ave. 48. Deputy Alfaro located 6 bindles containing a total of 5.4 grams of methamphetamine during a consent search on a vehicle stop. The juvenile was booked into Juvenile Hall. Thursday, 07-29-04 (45): No significant activity to report. Friday, 07-30-04 (55): 0005 hours - Deputy Wedertz arrested Paul Castillo for being under the influence of a controlled substance during a ped-check at Calle Arroba and Avenida Rubio. Saturday, 07-31-04 (52): 2001 hours, Dep. Ortega, arrested Michael Sumler for a parole violation. He contacted Sumler during a disturbing the peace call on the 79000 block of Ladera. Total calls for service: 1800 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT J U LY 2004 SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy: Robert Burbach COPS Grant Funded Position School Session: HIGHLIGHTS Spoke with a student regarding possible gang involvement. Contacted Gang Officer Monis and had him talk with the student who claims the Inland Empire (Chino). Handled a 5150 student. Student had threatened to kill himself with his dad 's handgun the week prior. I transported the male student to Indio Mental Health for 72-hour evaluation. Spoke with a student regarding a rape that was committed by her high school age boyfriend off campus at his trailer. Case referred to Indio Investigations for follow up. Fight on school grounds. 3 students involved. All 3 students were expelled from summer school. No prosecution desired. Intoxicated 14-year-old female summer school student came to the office saying she didn't feel well. Paramedics responded and released the student to mom. Theft of a cell phone. Occurred on the last day of school from the girl's locker room. No suspect information is available. LA QUINTA POLICE MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY REPORT PROGRAM STATISTICS J U LY 2004 Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams Speed 'Violations Fail to Yield Turning Violations Stop Sign / Red Light Chlid seat violation Seatbelt 80 Lane Change Violation DUI Arrests Misd. Arrest Felony arrest No & Suspended CDL Tows 1 Warnings Injury T/C Non -Injury T/C Non -Moving B/U's & Calls H&S 48 0 6 7 6 2 8 17 0 58 6 14 32 2 1 18 0 HIGHLIGHTS La Quinta Police Department Special Enforcement Team Monthly Report July., 2004 (Photo not available) (Dep. Coleman, Dep. Olsen, Dep.Wedertz, Dep. Bolton) The following is a summary of the Special Enforcement Team activities for the month of June. Ongoing Investigations 6 Probation Searches 5 Parole Searches 0 Arrests/ Filings 3 Vehicle checks 9 Business Contacts 26 Investigation assists 5 Arrest Warrants Served 3 Arrest Warrants Attempted 4 Programs 2 Pedestrian Checks 7 Crime Prevention Hours 140 Bar Checks 4 Back-ups 6 Follow-ups 8 Search Warrants 3 Meetings 3 Recovered Stolen Property 1 Citations issued 1 Surveillance's 3 Property Checks 11 Civil Commitments 0 Bicycle Time 0 Training Hours 32 Illegal Drugs Seized 0 Total Mileage: 890 miles Noteworthy Accomplishments: ♦ Arrested Gerardo Guillen 23, Coachella for two counts of 459 PC -Burglary, 496 PC -Possession of stolen property. SET team conducted a week and half long surveillance program on the above subject. Guillen was later apprehended at the Motel 6 in Bermuda Dunes. Guillen had numerous felony and misdemeanor warrants in addition to the above charges. ♦ Assisted CCAT(Career Criminal Apprehension Team) search warrant 52000 block of Avenida Alvarado, suspect Gabriel Salazar 20, was arrested for firearms violations. ♦ Arrested Paul Castillo 18, of 909 for 11550 H&S. Castillo is currently on probation for 459 PC - Burglary. ♦ Deputies Wedertz and Bolton attended 16 hour Search Warrant and preparation course at BCTC. ♦ Assisted CVNTF in search warrant 53000 block of Avenida Obregon, stolen property and narcotics located, 1 subject taken into custody. CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER REPORT C.S.O.: Monica Santillanes C.S.O.: Thomas Fowler JULY 2004 Summary of Months Activity Type of Activity Number of Incidents Burglary Investigations 10 Grand Theft Reports 6 PettyTheft Reports 4 Vandalism/Malicious Mischief Reports 8 Vehicle Theft or Recovery Reports 2 Traffic Collision Response 7 Vehicle Code or Parking Citations 10 Abandoned Vehicles Tagged w/ Warn in 14 Towed Vehicles 3 Lost or Found Property Reports 6 Area Checks /LQ Skate Park/Laborers 27 Follow Up to Previous Cases 2 Custodial and Non -Custodial Trans orts 5 Miscellaneous Calls 10 r. 28J City of La Quinta Community Oriented Policing Office and Volunteers Report July, 2004 Highlights: • The volunteer program presently has fourteen volunteers who have finished training and are assisting in many capacities in the La Quinta CPO. We maintain the volunteer goal of staffing the CPO on a full time basis. • One applicant is in the background process. • Three volunteers are now entering all La Quinta traffic and parking citations, and one enters the traffic collisions into the system from the COPS Office. One volunteer is assisting with weapons identification on a computer at the CPO. One volunteer is assisting with Statistics. A volunteer is assisting in Logistics and one in Property in addition to their staffing duties. • We are beginning to cross train our volunteers so we will be able to interchange responsibilities when necessary. Volunteer Hours and Monthly CPO Stats Monthly YTD Totals (4/03 to Present) Hours 219.5 1583.5 3252.5 Visits 114 967 2249 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT INDIO STATION 82695 Dr. Carreon Blvd. Indio, California 92201 July 2004 Explorer Post 503 Program Report Submitted by Explorer Post Advisor Andy Gerrard There were 3 training meetings for Post 503 Explorers during June (7, 14, and 28). The meetings covered felony stops, physical training, drill/marching practice, defensive tactics, Riverside County Sheriffs Department Explorer Academy prep work, and one Deputy Coroner duties presentation. Deputy Bolton handled the defensive tactics and felony stop instruction. Deputy Alvarado and Explorer Captain Alejandro Barragan led the drill and marching practice. Deputy Coroner Horton gave the Deputy Coroner duties lecture. I coordinated the meetings and physical training. Post 503 members were treated to a pizza party on July 14. The pizza did not last long during the party. Explorers Vanessa Duenas, Robert Perez, and Aaron Rivera attended and successfully completed the July 18-22, 2004 Riverside County Sheriffs Department 2004 Explorer Academy at Ben Clark Training Center in Riverside. During the academy, 80 hours of law enforcement related training was given by a variety of expert instructors. Approx. 87 Explorers from Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties attended the academy. Deputy Courtney Pierce and I supervised Post 503 and Palm Desert Post 507 Explorers during the academy. We also served as academy tactical staff. � '7 CITY OF LA Q UINTA CRIME STATISTICS SUMMARY JUNE 2004 1w 083 CITY OF LA QUINTA JUNE CRIME COMPARISONS CRIME .TUNE 2004 .TUNE 2003 YTD (04) YTD (03) HOMICIDE 0 0 0 1 RAPE 0 1 4 6 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 0 0 7 8 SEX CRIMES ISD 1 3 7 6 ROBBERY 2 0 11 12 ASSAULT (FEL) 6 10 48 53 ASSAULT ISD 15 25 93 114 BURGLARY 67 7z 400 361 VEHICLE THEFT 17 12 84 60 THEFT (FEL) 24 32 137 153 THEFT MISD 43 35 272 212 VANDALISM ISD 18 32 145 173 DOM. VIOLENCE 7 19 70 79 NARCOTICS 9 8 77 36 DUI 11 6 57 30 T/C NON -INJURY 30 26 220 172 T/C INJURY 4 1 33 26 T/C FATAL 0 0 0 2 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 229 328 2273 1946 STATISTICS DO NOT INCLUDE ATTEMPTS CITY OF LA QUINTA JUNE CRIME COMPARISONS ■ Jun-041 ❑ Jun-03 CITY OF LA QUINTA YEAR TO DATE CRIME COMPARISONS JUNE rl) c:� ■ 20041 ❑ 2003 NUSD. VAN 105 THEFI(11 23% ro CD rJ CITY OF LA QUINTA JUNE CRIME DISTRIBUTION VEHIC LE'IHFFT 9% NARCOTICS 13% 5% ASSAULT(F) 3% RGLARY 37% ■BURGLARY E THEFT(F) ASSAULT(F) El NARCOTICS Eg THEFT(M) ■ NIISD. VANDALISM ■ VEHICLE THEFT CITY OF LA QUINTA BURGLARY COMPARISONS I`J C.'D CAD ■ Jun-04 0 Jun-03 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 tl C.7 CITY OF LA QUINTA DUNE CALLS FOR SERVICE COMPARISONS ALL CALLS C RIIIIINAL CALLS NON -CRIMINAL CALLS ■ Jun-04 Jun-03 12000 2000 Ic CITY OF LA QUINTA YEAR TO DATE CALLS FOR SERVICE COMPARISONS ALL CALLS C REWWAL CALLS NON-C RBONAL CALLS ■ 2004 El 2003 CITY OF LA QUINTA TRAFFIC ACTIVITY COMPARISON TJ ■ JUN-0 4 JUN-03 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / JUNE 2004 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME S NUMBER OF INCIDENTS EMERGENCY 5.5 3 ROUTINE 8.96 1230 *STATS TAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S DATA WAREHOUSE AVERAGE. RESPONSE TIME REPORT Craig Anthony Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated. areas of Riverside County and the cities of: Beaumont 4. Banning 49• Calimesa 0 Canyon Lake Coachella .;. Desert Hot Springs 0 Indian Wells Indio Lake Elsinore 0 La Quinta fi Moreno Valley 0 Palm Desert 0 Perris Rancho Mirage 0 San Jacinto fi Temecula Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District 2 Jim Venable, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Marion Ashley, District 5 DEPARTMENT REPORT: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation uvitlt the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California 92570 • (909) 940-6900 • FAX (909) 940-6910 August 9, 2004 Honorable Mayor Adolph and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Ref: Quarterly Report Attached please find the Fire Department Quarterly Report for the City of La Quinta for April 1 through June'30, 2004. The report depicts the following highlights: Riverside County Fire Department units responded to the following La Quinta Calls: • Medical Aids 383 • False Alarms 11 • Structure Fires 1 • Vegetation Fires 4 • Automatic Ringing False Alarm 31 • Other Fires (vehicle, refuse, etc.) 15 • Public Service Assists 10 (Non -emergency assistance) • Fire Menace Standby 9 (Fuel spill, gas leak etc.) Other Activities: As you are aware, during this time period, the new Fire Station in North La Quinta was opened. Over the last couple months, personnel have settled in to the facility, and are busy organizing our equipment and programs. We also continue to see interest expressed by members of the community as they stop by for a tour. The Paramedic Program continues to operate out of Fire Station 32 — located in the Cove area of our community. We have been very fortunate to have this capability added to our operations within the City. An example of the value of this program is demonstrated in the narrative which follows. It shows that when it comes to c6tical patients, each and every second can be vital. io "On the July 2, 2004, Company 32 responded to a medical aid in the La Quinta Cove for an unresponsive patient. Upon arrival, we found a 74-year-old male slumped over in a chair breathing approx. 2 breaths per minute, with a heart rate of 40 beats per minute. With the assistance of the engine company, the patient's airway was managed and ALS therapy was initiated immediately. Critical to the patient's condition was the initiation of trans -cutaneously pacing of his heart. Additionally, an 1V was established, glucose levels were checked in case of hypoglycemia, and Narcan was also administered in case of accidental overdose on meds. Due to rapid intervention, the patient's blood pressure went from a dangerously low and failing 60 to an acceptable 160/80. The patient was loaded into the ambulance and transported to JFK with a firefighter as well as one of our Medics to assist the AMR paramedic. We did a follow up with JFK, regarding this patient's condition. They reported he is doing better, and was transferred to a different hospital. The simple fact is that by having paramedics and the engine crew on scene in a short period of time, we were able to provide both ALS and BLS care to a critical patient. Though AMR's on scene time was only about 6 to 7 minutes longer then ours, every second made a significant difference in patient out come. We truly believe if the engine company had to wait for Paramedics to arrive, this patient would not have survived." Signed — Rich Folia, FF/Medic — Squad 32. Respectfully submitted, Craig Anthony Fire Chief By: Dorian J. Cooley Battalion Chief Attachments 4; 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Totals E April-04 ■ May-04 ❑ June-04 44r A. vote, �V* �� % ?�s as ohs ,s 0,, es s s�s .yss.• o- 6j A ril-04 Ma -04 June-04 Medical Aids 124 118 141 False Alarms 7 1 3 Structure Fire 0 0 1 Vegetation Fires 2 2 0 Ringing Alarms 6 14 11 Other Fires 4 5 6 Public Service Assists 4 4 2 Fire Menace Standby 3 3 3 TOTALSI 160 147 167 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 La Qua city Fire Responses Quarterly Totals Quarterly Comparisons O 2004 ■ 2003 >k •b'}.t ia�?a�.� tip£''. =���'WSf � i. �J";p �^"��4^ �. y ct: {��l+qv X.� '{' '{iM'L � i, s•#i2!'t ��''ji'i Yy�p�"' G µ1'L.". ''p� '^, �M '�''i�j 4 ���¢ .i`aF��c;6'��h� ���?iTM^ s v.. � 'i. 5� Y�.'Y�°•Y+..;Z�+ ('.F�,��T"'F, 4 � �, Fth "r�t3�#'tl� �ak- 4} Y:��'e ��a..�w"t 2"'r, ^'ef�� ',�. �.X� ,�, � }v. r.#dd�+''� ��, F �t F �N ,��n�.•y'�3 �L�. 4:n `. , . .��� ks a„ N..•- .. ,w. a:.�:.v.. * .. . ... . . .. }. W:, i � n�.: a 1kiw:r i HIiK +lira...'(: xSA✓7+ h, A--- s L% Z, �j % G,lb Le- 0%. ode 0 VO ems% %�6 sus y Second Quarter 2004 2003 Medical Aids 383 263 False Alarms 11 18 Structure Fire 1 4 Vegetation Fires 4 2 Ringing Alarms 31 29 Other Fires 15 2 Public Service Assists 10 19 Fire Menace Standby 9 4 TOTALS 464 341 8/9/2004 n 'j -j YMCA Art Art Wall Participant List - 2004 LAST NAM E FIRST NAME Acosta Angelicia Almada Alany Alvarez Sharon Burns Monique Caballero Jasmine Chavarria Breana Comer Allee Comer Haylee Duran Elijah Gonzales Isaac Hadsell Mackenzie Hellawell Zakary Hernandez Joshua Howard Gabriella Jackson Kiara Jaime Brianna Kinsey Derrick Lynch Summer Maloney Sydni Morring Seth Pavia Kaila Ponce Angel Ponce Veanna Smith Elizabeth Smith Emily Solis Jordan Valdez liana White Taryn Zavala Michael S:\Community Services\Artwork (Student)\ArtWall\YMCA 2003-04\Participant Alphabetical listing.doc .3 CU _f f oft OF 9ti COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Declaring the Public Interest and Necessity of Acquisition of'a Portion of the Property Located at 80025 Vista Grande, La Quinta, California (APN 649- 142-001), for Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase II, Highway 1 1 1 to Indio Boulevard, Project No. 2000-19 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of a portion of the property located at 80025 Vista Grande, La Quinta, APN 649-142-001, together with a temporary construction easement over the property for a period of twelve (12) months, for the purpose of improving Jefferson Street. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The appraised fair market value of the portion of the property proposed for acquisition is $7,696.00. Additional costs will be incurred in legal fees, appraisal fees and court costs relating to the initiation of eminent domain proceedings if the Resolution is approved and the matter proceeds to court. The proposed Jefferson Street Phase II improvements are funded in accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta, the City of Indio, the County of Riverside, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ( "CVAG "), as amended. The overall project costs for the Phase 11 improvements are estimated at $16,700,000. CVAG has agreed to pay 75% of these costs. The remaining 25 % will be paid by the jurisdiction in which the improvements are constructed. The City of La Quinta's funding contribution (25% of the project costs within its jurisdiction) is estimated at $2,797,250. Of this amount, the City has been provided a credit in the amount of $963,000 from State Transportation Improvement Program funding obtained by the City to offset the costs of the newly included bridge across the Whitewater River. The City has also been provided a credit in the 6mount of $1,647,184 as repayment for the regional share advanced by the City for the Washington Street Improvements. The City shall be responsible to repay any balance of its portion of the proposed improvements minus its credit in the amount of $2,610,184. Considering the City's estimated costs are $2,797,250, the City's out-of-pocket share will be approximately $186,466. However, the City's actual contribution will be calculated based upon the project's final costs. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Subject to the City Council's approval, staff recommends adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to authorize acquisition of a portion of the property located at 80025 Vista Grande, within the city limits of the City of La Quinta. The property is to be utilized for the widening of Jefferson Street, Project No. 2000-19. This property was appraised by Michael A. Scarcella, MAI, of Capital Realty Analysts. Mr. Scarcella reviewed the applicable market data, identified and analyzed. relevant comparable sales, and issued his opinion that, as of the date of value (January 1, 2004) the fair market value of the property was $7,696.00. Legal descriptions of the portion of the property referenced in the proposed acquisition and the temporary construction easement are attached to the Resolution as Exhibits A through D. Staff obtained title information reflecting the vesting of the property from Chicago Title Company, and an offer to purchase a portion of the property for the full amount of the appraised value was sent to the record owners on June 8, 2004. The offer letter transmitted all comparable sales upon which the appraiser based his opinion of value and the relevant parts of his appraisal report. A copy of the offer letter, excluding attachments, is provided as Attachment 1. Staff, the City's right-of-way consultant (Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc.), and the City Attorney have communicated with the owners in an attempt to review any information the owners may have regarding value, and to work towards the goal of reaching an agreement on the transfer of the property by way of a negotiated acquisition. As of the date of this report, no such agreement has been reached. As such, staff is now recommending the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing acquisition of the property by exercise of eminent domain. 2 Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.220, the City may not commence an eminent domain proceeding until the City Council has adopted a "Resolution of Necessity." As a part of the Resolution, the City Council must find and declare each of the following: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. 2. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that would be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. 3. The property described in the Resolution is necessary for the proposed project. 4. An offer meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record. The owners of the property are entitled to be heard on this subject, and on the issue of whether the City has followed all other procedures and is otherwise authorized to acquire the property by exercise of eminent domain. Notice to the property owners of this Resolution of Necessity hearing, and the subjects to be considered and proposed to be determined, was sent to the record owners on July 26, 2004. A copy of this notice is provided as Attachment 2. As of this date, the City has received no response from the property owners relating to this hearing. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proposed Project The acquisition of the property is proposed for the Jefferson Street Improvement Project, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard. The project will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane, arterial highway, with a typical 120' cross-section. A diagram showing the extent of the project is submitted herewith as Attachment 3. Staff believes that the public interest and necessity require the Jefferson Street Improvement project. A traffic analysis was conducted by Mr. Robert Ross, P.E., of RBF Consulting, a copy of which is included as Appendix 8.1 of the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, which is being transmitted to the City Council under separate cover. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California, and is expected to increase to over 312,000 by the year 2010. The project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and to accommodate safe traffic movements. Staff concurs with Mr. Ross' assessment. 3 The Proposed Project Is Planned or Located In The Manner That Will Be Most Compatible With The Greatest Public Good And The Least Private Injury The improvements will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane arterial highway, providing much needed additional traffic handling capacity over the Jefferson Street arterial to accommodate both present and future traffic demands. The widening of Jefferson Street is designed to relieve regional traffic congestion and improve the capacity of the street, which will require continuity in the roadway alignment and traffic handling capacity of the street. The project also improves an. important linkage to Highway 1 1 1 and the 1-10 for existing and proposed residential, commercial and resort uses in La Quinta and Indio. The project will also widen and construct a multiple span, all weather bridge over the Whitewater River that will provide greater vehicular safety, including enhanced safety during flood events. In addition, the bridge will provide additional opportunities for wildlife movement and habitat access. The project will result in the least private injury because the right-of-way being acquired is limited to properties immediately adjacent to the existing roadway. These facts support the finding that the project is designed in a manner compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. The Property Described In the Resolution Is Necessary For the Proposed Project The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that it is consistent with the City's General Plan, and specifically the City's Circulation Element. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley's population is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California and is expected to increase. This project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and accommodate safe traffic movements. Other Requirements The project has been reviewed and approved under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Originally, the project was reviewed in the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SCN 99031046 ("1999 IS/MND"), which was certified by the City Council on May 18, 1999, in City Council Resolution No. 99-66. On August 19, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum updated the information about the project and found that the project will cause no effects on the environment that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance based on the mitigation measures adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum further supports that the project modifications that have occurred since 1999 would not result in significant 4 environmental impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construction of the proposed roadway improvements. On August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk, in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. In considering the Resolution of Necessity, the City Council should consider the environmental information contained in the Addendum, along with information in the 1999 IS/MND. Both documents have been distributed to the City Council under separate cover. In addition, on August 12, 2003, the Planning Commission considered whether the potential acquisition of the properties along Jefferson Street was consistent with the City's General Plan, in accordance with Government Code Section 65402. The Planning Commission concluded that the acquisitions of the properties would be in conformity with the General Plan, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 2003- 059 reflecting such findings. A copy of that Resolution is provided as Attachment 4. Lastly, on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. The Relocation Plan has been transmitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development as required by law. Therefore, all of the legal prerequisites to the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity have been satisfied. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of a portion of the property located at 80025 Vista Grande, La Quinta, APN 649-142-001, for the purpose of improving Jefferson Street; or 2. Conduct a public hearing and do not adopt of a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of a portion of the property located at 80025 Vista Grande, La Quinta, APN 649-142-001, for the purpose of improving Jefferson Street; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 5 Respectfully submitted, T' othy R. J asson . E. Public Works Directo City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Offer letter 2. Notice of Resolution of Necessity Hearing, dated July 26, 2004 3. Project Diagram 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2003-059 0 Jt�� RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY OF ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 80025 VISTA GRANDE, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA (APN 649-142-001) FOR JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, PROJECT NO. 2000-19 WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta has been the investigating potential acquisition of a portion of property located at 80025 Vista Grande, in the City of La Quinta, bearing Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. 649-142-001, and more specifically described in the legal description and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "D"" which are incorporated herein by reference ( "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City has been investigating the potential acquisition of this Property for the widening of Jefferson Street, specifically the Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project No. 2000-19 ("Project"); and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004, after no less than 15 days written notice to the record owners of the Property, as shown on the title information obtained by the City, and the last equalized assessment roll, the City Council of the City of La Quinta held a public hearing for the purpose of considering, and allowing the record owners of the Property a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on, all of the following matters: A. Whether the public interest and necessity require the Project; B. Whether the Project is planned or located in a manner that is most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. Whether the Property proposed to be acquired is necessary for -the Project; D. Whether the offer required by Government Code § 7267.2 has been made; and . E. Whether the City has properly exercised all of its statutory responsibilities and duties antecedent to the legal exercise of eminent domain against the Property; and 119/015610-0008 7 528127.01 a08/13/04 r' City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council has received various factual information bearing upon each of the matters referenced above, including but not limited to, the representations made within, and evidence attached to, the staff report prepared by staff for consideration in connection with the hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, as a result of such hearing, has determined that the public health, safety, and welfare require that the City acquire fee interest in a portion of the Property for the purposes of the widening of Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, the Project was originally reviewed and approved under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SCN 99031046 ("1999 IS/MND"), which was certified by the City Council on May 18, 1999, in City Council Resolution No. 99-66; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum updated the information about the project and found that the project will cause no effects on the environment that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance based on the mitigation measures adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum further supports that the project modifications that have occurred since 1999 would not result in significant environmental .impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construction of the proposed roadway improvements; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk, in compliance with Section 21 152 of the Public Resources Code; and WHEREAS, in considering the Resolution of Necessity, the City Council has considered the environmental information contained in the Addendum, along with information in the 1999 IS/MND; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2003, the Planning Commission considered whether the potential acquisition of the properties along Jefferson Street was consistent with the City's General Plan, in accordance with Government Code Section 65402. The Planning Commission concluded that the acquisitions of the properties would be in conformity with the General Plan, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 2003-059 reflecting such findings. WHEREAS, on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by 119/015610-0008 ^) 4 528127.01 a08/13/04 8 11 (� City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 3 Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. The Relocation Plan has been transmitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development. WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta is authorized to acquire the Property for street improvement purposes under the authority of its own charter, and under the authority granted by Government Code Sections 37350.5 and 40404. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. The recitals set forth correct are true and correct and are adopted as the findings of the City Council. 2. The Project for which the acquisition of the Property is required is the Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase ll, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard Project, Project No. 2000-19. The project will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes generally to a six -lane, arterial highway, with a typical 120' cross- section. 3. The Property to be acquired is located within the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of. California, located at 80025 Vista Grande, in the City of La Quinta, bearing Assessor Parcel No. 649-142-01. The Property the City seeks to acquire consists of the following: a. A perpetual exclusive easement for public right-of-way and roadway purposes, including all use of the Property for purposes incident to public right-of-way use, including but not limited to the construction, maintenance, and operation of a roadway, underground and above ground utilities and appurtenances, cable communication or telecommunication facilities, directional, street identification, or motorist or pedestrian informational signage, traffic control devices, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, drainage and sewage facilities, and transportation facilities such as bus bays, benches, bus or train stops, bicycle pathways ,or facilities for railway or other public transportation vehicles or manners of conveyance of approximately 663 square feet of land, more specifically described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and depicted in the map attached as Exhibit "B". Excepting and reserving all oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances and minerals of every kind and character lying more than 500 feet below the surface of said land, together with right to drill into, through and to use and occupy all parts of said land lying more than 500 feet below the surface 119/015610-0008 9 528,127.01 a08/13/04 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 4 thereof for any and all purposes incidental to the exploration for and production of oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances or minerals from said other lands or, but without, however, any right to use either the surface of said land or any portion of said land within 500 feet of the surface for any purpose or whatsoever, as reserved in deeds of record. b. A temporary construction easement over approximately 870 square feet of Property, more specifically described in Exhibit "C" and depicted in Exhibit "D" attached hereto. The temporary construction easement shall consist of the interests described below: The temporary construction easement is a nonexclusive easement which permits City of La Quinta, its officers, employees, and contractors, to enter upon, occupy and pass over the temporary construction easement area more specifically described in the legal description attached as Exhibit "C" as deemed reasonably necessary for all purposes incidental to reconstructing and widening of Jefferson Street in accordance with the approved street construction (the "Project"). The temporary construction easement shall include the right to perform within the temporary construction easement area, any necessary excavation; grading; earth fill; compaction; installation of concrete forms; landscaping; irrigation; utility; and sign relocation; accommodation of private drainage facilities; and deposit of tools, equipment and material for all such necessary activities which are reasonably incidental to the work being performed on said property in connection with the Project. Such incidental activities shall include, but not be limited to, utilizing the temporary construction easement area for adjusting grade differentials between the planned street and the adjoining real property and/or matching existing concrete and/or asphalt paved areas, and/or natural grade areas, or such work as may pertain to on -site improvements to render the temporary construction easement area or the larger parcel to which it pertains in the same functional condition as reasonably practicable to the condition before the Project in terms of access, irrigation, and relation of public right-of-way improvements to the larger parcel. The temporary construction easement shall not include the right to store any materials or park any vehicles which are not incidental to the work to be performed on site in connection with the Project, nor to block all vehicular access to the larger parcel of the property of which the temporary construction easement area is a part, nor exercise the uses of the easement outside of the temporary construction easement area. In connection with 119/015610-0008 10 2 528127.01 a08/13/04 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 5 the exercise of the temporary construction easement rights hereunder, City shall protect all structures on the temporary construction easement area in place, and shall protect or restore all improvements thereon. The rights granted hereunder shall commence fourteen (14) days after written notification to the property owner of the commencement of construction of the Project and shall continue in full force and effect until written notice to the owner of record that the temporary construction easement is no longer needed by the City, or twelve (12) months after notice of the initiation of the temporary construction easement, whichever is earlier. Upon termination of the temporary construction easement, the temporary construction easement area shall be restored to a condition that is as functionally equivalent as is practicable to its condition prior to the commencement of the work, consistent with the Project as designed and as to be constructed. 4. The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that it is consistent with the City's General Plan, and specifically the City's Circulation Element. The City Council hereby adopts the findings set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 2003-059. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley's population is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California 'and expected to increase. This project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and accommodate safe traffic movements. 5. The Project is located in a manner most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury, in that the improvements will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane arterial highway providing much needed additional traffic handling capacity over the Jefferson Street arterial to accommodate both present and future traffic demands. The proposed Project will also widen and construct a multiple span, all weather bridge over the Whitewater River that will provide greater vehicular safety, including during flood events, and providing additional opportunities for wildlife movement and habitat access. The proposed Project will result in the least private injury in that the design of the roadway widening must of necessity occupy land which is immediately adjacent to the existing roadway, in order to maintain the continuity of the alignment of the road for all users. The Property to be taken for the project is necessitated and established by the street alignment in an effort to minimize any disproportionate burden or impact of the required property being taken from individual property owners. The Project is designed in a manner compatible with 119/015610-0008 528127.01 a08/13/04 7 113 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 6 the greatest public good in that the Project will involve road widening so as to improve an important link between Highway 111 and 1-10. 6. The Property to be acquired is necessary for the Project, in that the Project is designed to relieve regional traffic congestion and improve the capacity of the street which will require continuity in the roadway alignment and traffic handling capacity of the streets. 7. The offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record, by way of a letter dated June 8, 2004. City staff has attempted to negotiate with the record owners and their representatives subsequent to the issuance of this offer, but the negotiations have not proved successful in securing the necessary property interests. 8. Notice of the resolution of necessity hearing was provided to the owners of record by way of mailed, written notice sent on July 26, 2004. 9. To the extent any of the Property to be taken herein is devoted to a public use, the City finds that the proposed use for the Property is compatible with, or more necessary to, such public use, and that the City is authorized to acquire the Property pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510 and 1240.610. 10. The City Council hereby declares its intent to acquire the Property in the City's name in accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 11. The Project has been reviewed and approved under CEQA through the 1999 IS/MND and the Addendum thereto. The City finds that as reflected in the Addendum, that there have been no subsequent changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken, no new information of substantial importance regarding significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives which has become available, and no subsequent changes have been proposed in the Project which would require further environmental review. 12. The law firm of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, City Attorney for the City of La Quinta ("City Attorney"), is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and prosecute in the name of the City such proceedings in a court having proper jurisdiction thereof, as may be necessary for the acquisition of the Property described herein, including without limitation, seeking prejudgment possession of such Property, and to prepare and file such pleadings, documents, and otherwise prosecute such actions as may be necessary .in the opinion of the City Attorney to acquire the Property for the City. Such attorneys are specifically authorized to take 119/015610-0008 ,� 2 r\ L 528127.01 a08/13/04 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 7 whatever steps and/or procedures as are available to them under the Eminent Domain Law of the State of California, relating to acquisition of the Property. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DONALD 0. ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 119/015610-0008 4 . 528127.01 a08/13/04 1 .i �� Subject APH 649-142-M �oorr��nw ffjop4w #YAP •o.loai.r,�. �. ��waaw ftes, all jwvv if APx • 7" Guam /oib of ONO MINNOW b. b co* d to a wbr Carr d Arw� Mob d =sjki�w- w Nf O�oa Oaa�►1M�o�N►daW~Card IM��roeNO N rMiMl� at w. aoi�.aae w�iord w 1,ot,� wwea awM •w wMMraAr arMoAr iw d�oi/ Loot,/ •w�yA w looeiip oar�r wa nww WMt Ma dot b t s won** do OWN owe erieow ssfto * sw her a �w d�00 tNt; MrdateM SW ONS No O oowilri,.awotwa a�owr■laa�b d!0'�00�0� ba oowtd awMo�oaaw�w+ot#aaioNawoowaaA�rroMo�►o� M�a a�/uod�0.00too� a wool w d Daft orN t� oot0 �elnf roow NaA� 00�'�O�Wr' WIooR lh r AIM UN aunty OLU toot Immoo a smim &Vb Ot0; t MO arY uert#o� rf L�t,� w01 M'�'Or Wloot i1►7� dot b • nowt oh a tlw palatal b tt� t�otowl d Dolt aoolaiw d A�ou Wb� d aW Lot,Wi�Y ���il M M� a0�'01'Wr'r! N►,� wt b � �wM�► � MMa d" ON aourw*w Nook WWW W@d 1600110 bow PGwOF MM11111110. COIRMwNs �p �+w Trot wow rlor. �� T arorlw/ aM w t#w � w� • �o�t MwoL NAA91'70rGaimma 10006 It lioiati OooUMNO OFam" ThisNara/ 1wmrvalor ariaotw L Oft w110..a+l40341M i11) CARTAL REALTY AXUYM FINAL &rareAWLs •Akam•Aohr M EXHIBIT 14 r . Subod Prop wW APN U9.142-001 now= 2.0.2. m i .o� SWT S3 s.r. C/L V I STA Q%MVE Nwooa • x•r (R) / — —000 — • am OCP �mom .0 , r" Wh --------------- � s 1 TAM � i j�jiru I molts �a at -- a. a• SHM 1 w t SMMT MAT TO AC~AW A LEM OEICI rTION MR �w•�rs AIEMT-Oi-MNY fOR I • • • �r�•rrww�►�r+� SIMI W TIC ""GU rTiNO �wa� • rw�.r•� • .�... CRY W LA OURM aaC le' m 17. am .ur ar-teo�♦11 ,AWAL fALTY AMaYi'1'= {. WATiAPlO •ANALV M•AOY EXHIBIT B 15 j17 r Su*d Property APN U9-142-001 Temporary Construction Easement L"ai Descdpdon 74-M MI '.r. 08101% CA► A M4M ra r.w,.rl .�aoN s�Nur�ro i�ir CNN rnNOUN R"wMwt Tw woo poom d bw www in h Cw/ d to amkft cw* at Irwaft am at CaMalloMir.parondLotl�rlTMatlio�rir �hoirdn.a���wodwln �ookdf. � 7: • d MW in M CNN or sw cmwr ftwow of sw cM* d *me" a�o� poAl1 4 dmwbW r bbw TM...ry an bw of rr Wooy MOD so d dd trot IL vim �oc�rnN. rw�Nor r�powo. � wN�iA.1.Mrson art, eo�oo�oe h.rwa� cowr�rrNk a7o aq�w. � �• or Mr. eorr rr� and d ear w. i.�rrna mod.. prthr�ol. r CTTO at CoronrMs #Voft IwIMralWis►d MEMO* of ftw" Tlrt p��d b�► m• Q udr ny drrob� (13) CAMAS RULTY Ar "YM Rw. BRAnAwwr o AWLL Me AWAM EXHIBIT C 16 f Subject Property APN 649442.001 Temporary Construction Easement Map UOWAM T.C.C. Nw R VISTA GRANGE I w� ° 150109 1 1 I 1 I i It SKEET t OF t SHM '1AT TO ACCOIR'ANY A LEGAL OESCSI/lam MR A TWORARY ' ���rr• CONSTRl life- EASDAW FOR PF • iwr.sa.wo.ns�ra� J07mum STREET W IMF 00"OULTIN• ness r • Mw� • ..rw... CRY OF LA CUWTA apt svqO 17. am .K sa w s (i Z� CARTA L MALTY ANALYB'!'i FA& EsTAu AwLvM • ANALYS'11< s ADvr EXHIBIT D 17 jib Tit P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAUpICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 June 8, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Ferman C. Curiel 80025 Vista Grande La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Offer to Acquire a portion of Property as Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. 649-142-0001 Dear Mr. Curie]: The City of La Quinta (the "City") is Proposing the improvement of Jefferson Street, within the City. The g construction of a widening and of the above -referenced property, The City City understands you are the vested owner approximately 663 square feet of the property., �� to acquire � fee simple interest of construction easement, as more r together with a 870, square foot temporary hereto as Attachment "A", which cUlarly described in the legal description and ma attached is made Part of this offer by reference (the "Pro Ps letter contains an offer by the City to acquire the Pro PertY"). This which it proposes to do so. PY� and the terms and conditions on No final determination has been made at this point b Property. The City is in the process giY the City as to the ownership of the assist in dete rmation from a title comnmining exactly who the currseencturing owners are, and what o PAY which will have lease, financing, or other interests in theproperty.other persons or entities may contingent upon your or to the C' Any acceptance of this offer is interests in the Pro City of conclusive evidence that all parties with Perty (including, but not limited to, lessees, licensees lienh accepted this offer, and agreed on how the proceeds for the olders, etc.) have distributed. acquisition of the Property shall be Ile City had the Property appraised to determine i ' conducted by Mr. Michael Scazcella, MAI, of Capital� fair market value. The appraisal was comunonly accepted appraisal standards, and included consideration Realty •Analysts, in accordance with of the land. Mr. Scancella previously corresponded , °nsideration of the highest and best use th inspection of the Property, and inviting you°to Provide YOU, offering to meet with you on his Based on the appraisal, the City offers to purchase pthat ide information regarding the Property. any encumbrances to title such as liens, leases li any of the Property (free and clear of i 19roisb10-oo08 censes, or other interests which, in the City's 512597.01 o— 18 /lx-*y 1U9 ATTACHMENT 1 e -, r) Ji... Ferman C. Curiel June 8, 2004 Page 2 discretion, are unacceptable) for SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED N DOLLARS ($7,696.00 INETY-SIX (the "Purchase Price'). The basis for this offer is explained more thoroughly in Attachment B of this letter. Attachment `B" is a copy of the appraisal prepared by Mr. Scarcella, containing the data and pertinent discussion relative to threport value of the Property. It is made a part of this offer by reference. fair market This offer is for conveyance to the City of a fee interest in the Property, oil, gas, or mineral rights below the depth of 500 feet, and subject to terns and ondi excluding any below. Payment will be made when the title to the Pro tions set out recorded or unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments lease ui the City free and clear of all s and taxes, except: 1. Taxes for the year in which the Property is purchased, which shall be cleared and Paid in the manner required by Section 5086 of the Revenue of Taxation Code if unpaid at the time escrow closes; 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of record, that do not in with the City's proposed use of the property, as determined by the City; amaze' 3. Easements of rights -of -way over the land for public or quasi -public util' public street purposes, if any; and P ity or 4. Any other interests in the Property or exceptions to title appearing Preliminary title eport or litigation guarantee, which are accepted by the Ci in ritg°u a escrow. It shall be your responsibility to convey clear title and to y ting '°ugh lenders or other parties in obtaining reonveyances or other items necessary Y any fees or charges by nary to convey clear title. As a condition of this offer, the City reserves all rights and remedies it may have you, and all prior owners, to seek damages or other remedies in connection with an re against or other obligation the City incurs as a result of any contamination, as may bey mediation authorized by any law, including but not limited to CERCLA (42 U.S.C. Sub-SeCpernutted or seq.), the Hazardous Waste Control Law, California Health &Safety Code Section 9601 et seq.) the Porter Cologne Act (California Water Code Section 13000 et (Section Health et Safety Code Sections 25280 et seq. and 33459 et seq., and the provisions seq.) California Health & P Proposition 65. The City will pay all escrow and recording fees incurred in the purchase of the and if title insurance is obtained, the premium charge for such title insurance.o' Please let us know as soon as possible if the City's offer is acceptable. This off expire if it is not accepted 'on or before thirty (30) days from the date it has been mailedoffer shall If this offer is acceptable to you, please so indicate to the undersigned, in writing. to you. of your written acceptance, a Purchase and Sale Agreement incorporatingg Upon receipt and containing fiirther escrow instructions regarding review and the terms c this offer, title, will be forwazded to you for si elimination of exceptions to Y signature. Upon receipt of a signed Purchase and Sale J 119/015610.0001 512597.01 ao6V/o4 19 Ferman C. Curiel June 8, 2004 Page 3 Agreement, the matter will be reviewed by City Council, which has the deal is approved by the City Council, escrow will hi final approval authority. If generally uses Fast American Title Company to handle escrows, opened immediately. The City handle any escrow here. The City is, of course, willing to considerand proposes this company You so desire. 8 other escrow companies, if If for any reason you are not satisfied with this offer of 'ust c relevant information regarding the value of the Pro J compensation, and have it will be ha Property that you would like the City to consider, happy to do so. If you have such information, please contact me immediate) make arrangements to have the information reviewed and considered. If you have Y and I will regarding this offer, or wish to request any additional informs • any questions acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, at 760 776 n' you may contact our i ) 123 8. Please note that the City has made no decision to exercise its power acquire the Property, and can only do so after it holds a herein whi at of eminent domain to owner(s) have had an opportunity to appear and be heard. The Citywhich the affected property its property acquisitions by way of negotiated transactions and much prefers to accomplish toward the end of doing so with respect to this Property, would be more than willing to meet with you to ' related matter. Y discuss this offer, or any If for any reason you should see fit not to accept the Ci 's offer this letter, the offer made herein, the Attachments, and all matt ' please be advised that the provisions of Evidence Code § § 1152 and 1154, ands maall rs stated herein are m� under any Proceeding which may be instituted relating to the acquisition ot � admissible in evidence in other action. q n of the Property, or in any We hope this offer meets with your approval. As stated our Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, will be acquisition consultants, Bob any related matter, and will ill spy to meet with you to discuss the Property, the offer or attempt to contact you soon. If you need additional information, Please call me at the number referenced above. Thank you. Very truly yours, CI OF LA QUINTA i M. Ka erine Jenso ity Attorney`._ City of La Quinta 119/OIS6104M 512597.ol .oWl" 20 4� J P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Ferman C. Curiel 80025 Vista Grande La Quinta, CA 92253 July 26, 2004 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 7003 1680 0000 9821 1978 Re: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 649-142-001 Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located At The Southeast Comer of Vista Grande, In La Quinta, California Dear Property Owner or Tenant: This notice is sent to you under the requirements of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. This notice concerns the City of La Quinta's plans to consider acquiring, by eminent domain, fee simple interest of approximately 663 square feet of property, together with a 879 square foot temporary construction easement on the property located at the Southeast corner of Vista Grande, in the City of La Quinta, and bearing Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. 649- 142-001 (the "Property'). The City of La Quinta has been investigating the acquisition of this Property for the widening of Jefferson Street, Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project 2000-19 (the "Project"). California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030 provides that a City may exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire property for a proposed public project if the following conditions are established: A. The public improvement and necessity require the project. B. The project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the great public good and the least private injury. C. The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner of record. 119/0156104XI08 527106.01 a07/26/04 ATTACHMENT 2 Ferman C. Curie] July 269 2004 Page 2 E. The City has complied with all other procedural requirements eminent domain to acquire the ro q ents for utilizing the power of property. for review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). This notice is sent to inform you that the City Council of the City decide if the above conditions have been met, concernine City's of La Quinta will be asked to referenced Property. A Public hearing will be held at or about 7acquisition of the above - the City Council Chambers located at 78-495 Cane Tam ico L P'm' on August 17, 2004, in this Purpose. If the City Council finds that these conditions Tampico, Q�>� California 92253, for be asked to adopt a resolution of necessity, which is aprerequisite a been met, the City Council will eminent domain proceedings to acquire for the City's initiation of 8 quire property. For your information and convenience, a legal description of the notice. P Property is attached to this Please be advised that you are entitled to appeal. and be heard on within the resolution, and specifically those matters listed above.�y of the matters encompassed notice that you intend to do so in writing not less than fifteen 1 S The City asks that You provide hearing date, but your failure to meet this fifteen-da time ( )days before the scheduled refusal to consider an Y frame will not result in the City's Y Points you may wish to make at the hearing. You May make request with the City Clerk of the City of La Quints, 78-495 Calle Tampico,Y this written California 92253. Please take notice that if you wish to legally La Quints, the adoption of the resolution of necessity, or any of the findings challenge any action taken by including the City's right to use eminent domain to t acquire the s or matters included within it, court to raising only those issues raised at the resolution of necessity you may be limited in correspondence delivered to the City no less than fifteen days prior t hang' or in written Y P to the hearing on the matter. The City must adopt a resolution of necessity before an eminent commence. Within six months after the adoption of a resolution domain proceeding can commence eminent domain proceedings in the Riverside Coup n of necessity, the City may In any such proceeding, the court will be asked to determine Superior Court, Indio Branch. which you may be entitled in the event the Pro the amount of just compensation to Property is taken in eminent domain. For your information, on August .l9, 2003, the City Council o Resolution No. 2003-0762 wherein it certified an Addendum to the City of La Quints adopted Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99-3 78 State o Initial Study/Mitigated Negative II of the Jefferson Street Improvements (segment ( Clearinghouse No. 99031046) - phase Drive). On August 20, � between Highway 111 and Westward Ho 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk in compliance • regarding the certification Public Resources Code. The Addendum found that no effects P fiance with Section 21152 of the that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance as a on the environment are anticipated Previously certified Mitigation Measures adopted b the of this project based on the Resolution 99-66. The Addendum y City Council on May 18, 1999, under not result in significant environmentalfurther supports that the Project modifications involved will impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with 1191015610-0003 527106.01 a07/26104 22 3�214 Ferman C. Curiel July 26, 2004 Page 3 CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental acquisition and construction of the proposed roadway improvements. review is necessary for the resolution of necessity, the La Quinta City Council Will be asked to In considering the With the original Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for E utilize this Addendum, along 378. The Addendum, the Initial Study/Niitigated Negative Declaration nvironmental Assessment 99- Assessment 99-378, and Resolution No. 2003-076 are available for �n for Environmental Quinta City Hall, Public Works De inspection and copying at La Department, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through. Frida y In addition, please be advised that on November 18, 2003 the for the Jefferson Street Widening project, phase II, La uin City adopted the Relocation Plan Pacific &Cutler, Inc. Copies of the relocation plan Q' California, prepared by Overland, noted above. P are available for review at the same address Please understand that neither the pendency of the City's consideration necessity, nor the possible initiation of formal eminent domain proceedings, of the resolution of further negotiations from occurring for the acquisition of your Pro cgs' in any Way prevents willing to continue such negotiations.m', and the City is most If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me., Kathy Jenson, at (714) 641-3413. Thank you for your coop eration in this matter. Very truly yours, Aerine Jenso City Attorney, City of La Quinta Attachment — Legal Description 119101MI04M 527106.01 &Wn&W 23 J i..) f' G Subject Pf"Wrly APN 649-142-Ml Esser . nt Map i � ROtGf� R.0.0. i�1 sternlu a.r. CA VISTA GRANGE IMO(M om-w (R) a � 5. / V ' 6 P.O. Fl: DAU Una s imAOLTA Rows tss�rrr t 3 sN�0Y0s'r s � soo•o••a�t 36.10' a. �• �.ao• E*W PLAY To FM w s7REt crrr W u OU rA .a...u.�. • ; T , OF 1 SHEET MF ooNsuLmpogam DAM snnt� ��, a � ao-aa�o�-w C�'AL R2LAL?'Y AN11j,Y Rw. &rAis Arwa,u�.,m,rsn o mn 24 SubJW Prop" APN 640-142.001 Emmunt L"PI DescMpdon WPM arl7, � �+air".o��wu►Y APAssadja4m ?trot aatob /anon Of bad aIMbd b M C* of Le didb COW* Of fir d ft No of�r� t�aparondLd 1id7'MootY�p�aoahaa�anaar�rrwo/Rod l9�7aad• �.tiw.o�eadfiac�,.,+►�.mara..dc�►dwMr.i+�.a.oad �� at rr aarwaot aonrrdaoid La 1« tataaoa atoa0 Na �watwdaad naba�r tbao daaid Lot � rrapfi Nn taloaip aaaaoa f�aw aaror:� whr 7a00 tact bN. rorr�rp da tr�rk auw aaor� aouiMoMary an0 � a wdlu� d90i,00 � •am o dWioNlnW&@ i1.�t�rotdrou aaail�otanpb d!0'OOtiO" ba poiital W IN On bm alow mm tm say p" "anr No& ��a taftWO M fiat a oom t�arioa abn� Said a me amtact ftup a ao l" amb 0143ro , paalol band �„� dot daw oomm" d shoo �C b a point an a ina da■Y� Ord�� /■a! �Rt taat b tiia away it poMa abnr b N" nWW Vftd &W bat b"PCWfitC r NRNi & �*M� M� �4+w wot Sow ar 1000. �f 1'' at�frd and bsr bb w�� nay a port Mwd �p70a1�or� �� MEl eFMtot►and Raoaiaonbdll000rd. TW read br ime ar ardor a v dtwaroa L MOWKWOM W bomm oon sam CAMAL ftALTV ANALYSTS RW BorA= * J%mavM O AoVmM 25 j2.� 7 t. Subject Property APN 649-142-M Temporary Construction Easemont Map UOMARS T.C.C. IO1 /�� j .ertiuoM STW 00 S.F. CA VISTA Q M X Ow GAI1 SHEET i O: t SHEET ' MAT TO ACQOWANY A LEGAL OElCAlTMON FOR A TDAVRARY OONSTRIICTIOiN EAXIMENT fOR • • • �•s�w�s Ju7mum Simi IN Tw OON�YLTIN• 7wM�70 • �Y�IN • ..�.� CRY W LA OLMA DAW- wll 17. am (12) CArrrAL ItsALT V Ar LYM Rw. ftFA?L AR%4R=. AwLLvM • ArMWs 26 J .8 Subject Property APN WI42-001 Temporary OMetroedon Ease neAt Legal Dnedpdm aw orwk GA i 4404wiw *a# parr n, > JR264M ww mw�4 ad ��■�* � o�owr IIUCTWN wsism APA80464424n Tlrt orWn oaron at IMe .l." M h ow a La adft am* a# mmaw saw d ca •OvrondLal lior'lmd SA— 3M nalrmannnapri Md todb @NkIW. �a�a 7 and � d 11ya b M OAo� a b Goun�r 1lomrrNr d •a1d anw+r a AMrMdn, now o�oulr�r woad r Lo1ow� TM•••r�r �nao �aeau. ��, �aoo�.ca.rd Lot t� CONt/IMaIOs i70 sq�w � mar ar wr. lslN� T a1rdM0 and by Now nrda • prt ha. a&ISCT?O a1 GoNnrft x0M1, lIy1M�.o�.yyw wda 11noo� TW pwprad lsr ar ar uidorn0►dlwr�on. *6onoa00= 30M CAnTAL RLALTY AHALym A" ESTATE AWPLA�oA1"VM•64& 27 J 4 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed by the law office of Rutan & Tucker, LLP in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 611 Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth Floor, Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931. On July 26, 2004, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located At The Southeast Corner of Vista Grande, In La Quinta, California by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below: Ferman C. Curiel 80025 Vista Grande La Quinta, CA 92253 In the course of my employment with Rutan & Tucker, LLP, I have, through first-hand personal observation, become readily familiar with Rutan & Tucker, LLP's practice of collection and processing correspondence formailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that i practice I deposited such envelope(s) n an out -box for collection by other personnel of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, and for ultimate posting and placement with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. If the customary business practices of Rutan & Tucker, LLP with regard to collection and processing of correspondence and mailing were followed, and I am confident that they were, such envelope(s) were posted and placed in the United States mail at Costa Mesa, California, that same date. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.** Executed on July 26, 2004, at Costa Mesa, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Lauren Ramey (Type or print name) ►uq �L. F VA ** Served by certified mail, return -receipt requested, article number 70031680 0000 9821 1979. !046101 s610-M8 127176.01 a07/26/04 28 J�0 OONOYLTINN 1�MfN • Ir Nllr� • �� ATTACHMENT 3 29 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2043-0150 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF CONFORMITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65402, FOR A POTENTIAL. ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR THE WIDENING OF JEFFERSON STREET. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FINDING APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, said Section 65402 requires the jurisdiction's planning agency's (i.e., Planning Commission) review and report upon whether the proposed acquisition of real property for public purposes is consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 12th day of August, 2003, hold a pubic meeting to consider a finding of conformity with the General Plan for said potential Project Site, more particularly described as, APN: 649-071-008 THROUGH 021 AND 029; 849-090-001 THROUGH 009; AND 649-141-001 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did. make the following findings of conformity with respect to the proposed project: The proposed acquisition is in. conformance with the La Quinta General Plan, as follows: LAND USE ELEMENT: The recently adopted General Plan Land Use Element anates the properties as Low Density Residential (LDR), up to four dwelling per acre. The Element indicates the need to meintain compatible high ty land uses. The widening of Jefferson Street will not alter the surrounding use designations, and is consistent with the Element. ;ULATION ELEMENT: This Element designates Jefferson Street as a Major rial Road with a 120 foot width right-of-way. This project will allow the :t to be expanded to comply with this Element. V SPACE ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 4. PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENT: No key planning issues or. policies are identified. 30 ATTACHMENT 4 J J 4 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-059 jarferson Street Widening - General Plan Conformity Finding Adopted: August 12, 2003 , Page 2 S. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES: This Element provides several policies and programs designed to protect and preserve the unique and/or valuable resources, including biologic resources. The properties at issue are disturbed. To the extent applicable,. this project will be subject to the requirements of the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard Fee Mitigation Program and other applicable mitigation measures. 7. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are Identified. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT: This Element indicates that the site is within an area that is susceptible to wind-blown sand, collapsible soils, potential liquefaction hazard, and seismically induced settlement. If the properties are acquired, the widening. of Jefferson Street will meet all applicable engineering requirements, and the street and landscape improvements will reduce the potential for blowsand in the vicinity of the subject property. 9, CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 10. HOUSING ELEMENT: As a result of widening Jefferson Street the project requires acquisition of residential and vacant lots. Acquisition of the residential properties will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, and will not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, because the acquisition involves a relatively small number of properties and the current housing conditions reveal that there is more than adequate existing housing in La Quinta to accommodate the displaced households. Likewise, state mandated relocation benefits will be paid to applicable displaced persons in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance & Real Properties Act of 1970, as amended, and owners of the residential property will be compensated fair market value for their property, determined on the basis of the highest and best use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Ouinte, California, as follows: 1. That the recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case; and C:Xoocuments and Settings%tdeerin9XLoa8i Settings%Temporary Internet ReMOLI(Wreso jefferson st.doe 31 ^gin Planning Comm4alon Resolution 2003-059 Jefferson SErm Wiider*q - G~al Plan Conformity Finding Adopted: August 12, 2003 Page 3 2. That it does hereby adopt this finding of conformity for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, and as shown on the Map attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 12th day of August, 20031 by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners Abets, Daniels, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk NOES: None ASSENT: Commissioner Quill ABSTAIN:. None TOM KIRK, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quints, California C:1Docume+nts and Settings%tdoeringUcal SettingslTamporary Internet FlINAOLK54\reso Jefferson st-doc 32 .� �. COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Declaring the Public Interest and Necessity of Acquisition of Property Located Along Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California (APN 649-090-010, 649-090-011, 649-080-013 and 649-071-010), for Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project No. 2000-19 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of a portion of the property located along Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California (APN 649-090-010, 649-090-01 1, 649- 080-013 and 649-071-010) . FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The appraised fair market value of the property proposed for acquisition is a total of $50,090.00. Additional costs will be incurred in legal fees, appraisal fees and court costs relating to the initiation of eminent domain proceedings if the Resolution is approved and the matter proceeds to court. The proposed Jefferson Street Phase II improvements are funded in accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta, the City of Indio, the County of Riverside, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG"), as amended. The overall project costs for the Phase II improvements are estimated at $16,700,000. CVAG has agreed to pay 75% of these costs. The remaining 25 % will be paid by the jurisdiction in which the improvements are constructed. The City of La Quinta's funding contribution (25% of the project costs within its jurisdiction) is estimated at $2,797,250. Of this amount, the City has been provided a credit in the amount of $963,000 from State Transportation Improvement Program funding obtained by the City to offset the costs of the newly included bridge across the Whitewater River. The City has also been provided a credit in the amount of $1,647,184 as repayment for the regional share advanced by the City for the Washington Street Improvements. The City shall be responsible to repay any balance of its portion of the proposed improvements minus its credit in the amount of $2,610,184. Considering the City's estimated costs are $2,797,250, the City's out-of-pocket share will be approximately $186,466. However, the City's actual contribution will be calculated based upon the project's final costs. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Subject to the City Council's approval, staff recommends adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to authorize acquisition of a portion of the property located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street , within the city limits of the City of La Quinta. The property is to be utilized for the widening of Jefferson Street, Project No. 2000-19 . This property was appraised by Michael A. Scarcella, MAI, of Capital Realty Analysts. Mr. Scarcella reviewed the applicable market data, identified and analyzed relevant comparable sales, and as of the date of value (January 1, 2004, and May 15, 2004), the fair market value of the property was a total $50,090.00. Legal descriptions of the portions of the property referenced in the proposed acquisition are attached to the Resolution as Exhibits A through J. Staff obtained title information reflecting the vesting of the property from Chicago Title Company, and an offer to purchase a portion of the property for the full amount of the appraised value was sent to the record owners on June 3, 2004, June 8, 2004 and July 27, 2004. The offer letters transmitted all comparable sales upon which the appraiser based his opinion of value and the relevant parts of his, appraisal report. Copies of the offer letters, without attachments, are provided as Attachments 1-3. Staff, the City's right-of-way consultant (Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc.), and the City Attorney have communicated with the owners in an attempt to review any information the owners may have regarding value, and to work towards the goal of reaching an agreement on the transfer of the property by way of a negotiated acquisition. As of the date of this report, no such agreement has been reached. As such, staff is now recommending the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing acquisition of the property by exercise of eminent domain. Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.220, the City may not commence an eminent domain proceeding until the City Council has adopted a "Resolution of Necessity." As a part of the Resolution, the City Council must find and declare each of the following: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. 2 J , 2. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that would be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. 3. The property described in the Resolution is necessary for the proposed project. 4. An offer meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record. The owners of the property are entitled to be heard on this subject, and on the issue of whether the City has followed all other procedures and is otherwise authorized to acquire the property by exercise of eminent domain. Notice to the property owners of this Resolution of Necessity hearing, and the subjects to be considered and proposed to be determined, was sent to the record owners on July 26, 2004 and August 2, 2004. A copy of these notices is provided as Attachments 4 and 5. As of this date, the City has been advised the property owners wish to address the Council relating to this hearing. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proposed Project The acquisition of the property is proposed for the Jefferson Street Improvement Project, Phase 11, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project 2000-19. The project will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane, arterial highway, with a typical 120' cross-section. A diagram showing the extent of the project is submitted herewith as Attachment 6. Staff believes that the public interest and necessity require the Jefferson Street Improvement project. A traffic analysis was conducted by Mr. Robert Ross, P.E., of RBF Consulting, a copy of which is included as Appendix 8.1 of the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, which is being transmitted to the City Council under separate cover. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California, and is expected to increase to over 312,000 by the year 2010. The project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and to accommodate safe traffic movements. Staff concurs with Mr. Ross' assessment. The Proposed Project Is Planned or Located In the Manner That Will Be Most Compatible With the Greatest Public Good And The Least Private Injury The improvements will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane arterial highway, providing much needed additional traffic handling capacity over the Jefferson Street arterial to accommodate both present and future traffic demands. The widening of Jefferson Street is designed to relieve regional traffic congestion and improve the capacity of the street, which will require continuity in the roadway alignment and traffic handling capacity of the street. The project also improves an important linkage to Highway 111 and the 1-10 for existing and proposed residential, commercial and resort uses in La Quinta and Indio. 3 J The project will also widen and construct a multiple span, all-weather bridge over the Whitewater River that will provide greater vehicular safety, including enhanced safety during flood events. In addition, the bridge will provide additional opportunities for wildlife movement and habitat access. The project will result in the least private injury because the right-of-way being acquired is limited to properties immediately adjacent to the existing roadway. These facts support the finding that the project is designed in a manner compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. The Property Described In the Resolution Is Necessary For the Proposed Project The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that it is consistent with the City's General Plan, and specifically the City's Circulation Element. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley's population is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California and expected to increase. This project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and accommodate safe traffic movements, and to maintain the continuity of alignment must of necessity utilize property adjacent to the existing right of way. Other Requirements The project has been reviewed and approved under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Originally, the project was reviewed in the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SCN 99031046 ("1999 IS/MND"), which was certified by the City Council on May 18, 1999, in City Council Resolution No. 99-66. On August 19, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum updated the information about the project and found that the project will cause no effects on the environment that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance based on the mitigation measures adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum further supports that the project modifications that have occurred since 1999 would not result in significant environmental impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construction of the proposed roadway improvements. On August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of- the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk, in compliance with Section 21 152 of the Public Resources Code. In considering the Resolution of Necessity, the City Council should consider the environmental information contained in the Addendum, along with information in the 1999 IS/MND. Both documents have been distributed to the City Council under separate cover. 4 In addition, on August 12, 2003, the Planning Commission considered whether the potential acquisition of the properties along Jefferson Street was consistent with the City's General Plan, in accordance with Government Code Section 65402. The Planning Commission concluded that the acquisitions of the properties would be in conformity with the General Plan, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 2003- 059 reflecting such findings. A copy of that Resolution is provided as Attachment 7. Lastly, on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. The Relocation Plan has been transmitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development as required by law. Therefore, all of the legal prerequisites to the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity have been satisfied. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of property located along Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California (APN 649-090-010, 649-090-011, 649- 080-013 and 649-071-010), for the purpose of improving Jefferson Street; or 2. Conduct a public hearing and do not adopt of a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of property located along Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California (APN 649-090-010, 649-090-011, 649-080-013 and 649-071-010), for the purpose of improving Jefferson Street; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, mothy R onassU, P. E. Public Works Direc/City Engineer 5 i 1-� A pro d for submission y: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Offer letter 2. Offer letter 3. Offer letter 4. Notice of Resolution of Necessity Hearing dated July 26, 2004 5. Notice of Resolution of Necessity Hearing dated August 24, 2004 6. Project Diagram 7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2003-059 6 ! RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY OF ACQUISITION OF PORTIONS OF PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG JEFFERSON STREET, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA (APN 649-090-010, 649-090-011, 649-080-013 AND 649-071-010) FOR JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, PROJECT NO. 2000-19 WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta has been investigating potential acquisition of portions of property located along Jefferson Street, in the City of La Quinta, bearing Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010, 649-090-011, 649- 080-013 and 649-071-010, and more specifically described and depicted in the legal descriptions and maps attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "J", which are incorporated herein by reference ("Property"); and WHEREAS, the City has been investigating the potential acquisition of portions of these Properties for the widening of Jefferson Street, specifically the Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project No. 2000-19 ("Project"); and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004, after no less than 15 days written notice to the record owners of the Property, as shown on the title information obtained by the City, and the last equalized assessment roll, the City Council of the City of La Quinta held a public hearing for the purpose of considering, and allowing the record owners of the Property a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on, all of the following matters: A. Whether the public interest and necessity require the Project; B. Whether the Project is planned or located in a manner that is most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. Whether the Property proposed to be acquired is necessary for the Project; D. Whether the offer required by Government Code § 7267.2 has been made; and 119/015610-0008 529168.01 a08/13/04 7 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 2 E. Whether the City has properly exercised all of its statutory responsibilities and duties antecedent to the legal exercise of eminent domain against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received various factual information bearing upon each of the matters referenced above, including but not limited to, the representations made within, and evidence attached to, the staff report prepared by staff for consideration in connection with the hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, as a result of such hearing, has determined that the public health, safety, and welfare require that the City acquire fee interest in a portion of the Property for the purposes of the widening of Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, the Project was originally reviewed and approved under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SCN 99031046 ("1999 IS/MND"), which was certified by the City Council on May 18, 1999, in City Council Resolution No. 99-66; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum updated the information about the project and found that the project will cause no effects on the environment that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance based on the mitigation measures adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum further supports that the project modifications that have occurred since 1999 would not result in significant environmental impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construction of the proposed roadway improvements; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk, in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code; and WHEREAS, in considering the Resolution of Necessity, the City Council has considered the environmental information contained in the Addendum, along with information in the 1999 IS/MND; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2003, the Planning Commission considered whether the potential acquisition of the properties along Jefferson Street was consistent with the City's General Plan, in accordance with Government Code Section 65402. The Planning Commission concluded that the acquisitions of the 119/015610-0008 529168.01 a08/13/04 3 A 40 .-) City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 3 properties would be in conformity with the General Plan, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 2003-059 reflecting such findings. WHEREAS, on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. The Relocation Plan has been transmitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development. WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta is authorized to acquire the Property for street improvement purposes under the authority of its own charter, and under the authority granted by Government Code Sections 37350.5 and 40404. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. The recitals set forth. correct are true and correct and are adopted as the findings of the City Council. 2. The Project for -which the acquisition of the Property is required is the Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase Il, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard Project, Project No. 2000-19. The project will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes generally to a six -lane, arterial highway, with a typical 120' cross- section. 3. The Property to be acquired is located within the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, located along Jefferson Street, in the City of La Quinta, bearing Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010, 649-090-011, 649-080- 013 and 649-071-010. The Property the City seeks to acquire consists of the following: a. A perpetual exclusive easement for public right-of-way and roadway purposes, including all use of the Property for purposes incident to public right-of-way use, including but not limited to the construction, maintenance, and operation of a roadway, underground and above ground utilities and appurtenances, cable communication or telecommunication facilities, directional, street identification, or motorist or pedestrian informational signage, traffic control devices, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, drainage and sewage facilities, and transportation facilities such as bus bays, benches, bus or train stops, bicycle pathways ,or facilities for railway or other public transportation vehicles or manners of conveyance of approximately 1,696 square feet of land as to APN Nos. 649-090-010 and 649-090-01 1, more specifically described in the legal description attached 119/015610-0008 9 529168.01 a08/13/04 34 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 4 hereto as Exhibit "A" and depicted in the map attached as Exhibit "B"; approximately 5,476 square feet of land as to APN No. 649-080-013, more specifically described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and depicted in the map attached as Exhibit "D"; and approximately 1129 square feet of land as to APN No. 649-071-070, more specifically described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and depicted in the map attached as Exhibit "F". Excepting and reserving from all of the above all oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances and minerals of every kind and character lying more than 500 feet below the surface of said land, together with right to drill into, through and to use and occupy all parts of said land, lying more than 500 feet below the surface thereof for any and all purposes incidental -to the exploration for and production of oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances or minerals from said other lands or, but without, however, any right to use either the surface of said land or any portion of said land within 500 feet of the surface for any purpose or whatsoever, as reserved in deeds of record. b. Temporary construction easements over approximately 4,590 square feet of Property, as to APN No. 649-090-010 and 649-090- 011, more specifically described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "G" and depicted in the map attached as Exhibit "H"; 3,375 square feet of Property as to APN 649-080-013, more specifically described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "I" and depicted in the map attached as Exhibit "J". The temporary construction easements shall consist of the interests described below: Each temporary construction easement is a nonexclusive easement which permits City of La Quinta, its officers, employees, and contractors, to enter upon, occupy and pass over the temporary construction easement area more specifically described in the legal description attached as deemed reasonably necessary for all purposes incidental to reconstructing and widening of Jefferson Street in accordance with the approved street construction (the "Project"). The temporary construction easements shall include the right to perform within the temporary construction easement areas, any necessary excavation; grading; earth fill; compaction; installation of concrete forms; landscaping; irrigation; utility; and sign relocation; accommodation of private drainage facilities; and deposit of tools, equipment and material for all such necessary activities which are reasonably incidental to the work being performed on said property in connection with the Project. 119/015610-0008 529168.01 a08/13/04 0 v City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 5 Such incidental activities shall include, but not be limited to, utilizing the temporary construction easement areas for adjusting grade differentials between the planned street and the adjoining real property and/or matching existing concrete and/or asphalt paved areas, and/or natural grade areas, or such work as may pertain to on -site improvements to render the temporary construction easement areas or the larger parcel to which it pertains in the same functional condition as reasonably practicable to the condition before the Project in terms of access, irrigation, and relation of public right of way improvements to the larger parcel. The temporary construction easements shall not include the right to store any materials or park any vehicles which are not incidental to the work to be performed on site in connection with the Project, nor to block all vehicular access to the larger parcel of the property of which the temporary construction easement areas are a part, nor exercise the uses of the easement outside of the temporary construction easement areas. In connection with the exercise of the temporary construction easement rights hereunder, City shall protect all structures on the temporary construction easement area in place, and shall protect or restore all improvements thereon. The rights granted hereunder shall commence fourteen (14) days after written' notification to the property owner of the commencement of construction of the Project and shall continue in full force and effect until written notice to the owner of record that the temporary construction easement is no longer needed by the City, or twelve (12) months after notice of the initiation of the temporary construction easement, whichever is earlier. Upon termination of the temporary construction easement, the temporary construction easement area shall be restored to a condition that is as functionally equivalent as is practicable to its condition prior to the commencement of the work, consistent with the Project as designed and as to be constructed. 4. The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that it is consistent with the City's General Plan, and specifically the City's Circulation Element. The City Council hereby adopts the findings set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 2003-059. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley's population is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California and expected to increase. This project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and accommodate safe traffic movements. M 119/015610-0008 529168.01 a08/13/04 11 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 6 5. The Project is located in a manner most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury, in that the improvements will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane arterial highway providing much needed additional traffic handling capacity over the Jefferson Street arterial to accommodate both present and future traffic demands. The proposed Project will also widen and construct a multiple span, all-weather bridge over the Whitewater River that will provide greater vehicular safety, including during flood events, and providing additional opportunities for wildlife movement and habitat access. The proposed Project will result in the least private injury in that the design of the roadway widening must of necessity occupy land which is immediately adjacent to the existing roadway, in order to maintain the continuity of the alignment of the road for all users. The Property to be taken for the project is necessitated and established by the street alignment in an effort to minimize any disproportionate burden or impact of the required property being taken from individual property owners. The Project is designed in a manner compatible with the greatest public good in that the Project will involve road widening so as to improve an important link between Highway 1 1 1 and 1-10. 6. The Property to be acquired is necessary for the Project, in that the Project is designed to relieve regional traffic congestion and improve the capacity of the street which will require continuity in the roadway alignment and traffic handling capacity of the streets, and continuity of alignment requires the roadway expansion to occur immediately adjacent to the existing right of way. 7. The offers required by Government Code Section 7267.2 have been made to the owner of record, by way of letters dated June 3, 2004, June 8, 2004 and July 27, 2004. City staff has attempted to negotiate with the record owners and their representatives subsequent to the issuance of these offers, but the negotiations have not proved successful in securing the necessary property interests. 8. Notice of the resolution of necessity hearing was provided to the owners of record by way of mailed, written notices sent on July 26, 2004 and August 2, 2004. 9. To the extent any of the Property to be taken herein is devoted to a public use, the City finds that the proposed use for the Property is compatible with, or more necessary to, such public use, and that the City is authorized to acquire the Property pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510 and 1240.610. 119/015610-0008 529168.01 a08/13/04 2 1, City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 7 10. The City Council hereby declares its intent to acquire the Property in the City's name in accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 11. The Project has been reviewed and approved under CEQA through the 1999 IS/MND and the Addendum thereto. The City finds that as reflected in the Addendum, that there have been no subsequent changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken, no new information of substantial importance regarding significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives which has become available, and no subsequent changes have been proposed in the Project which would require further environmental review. 12. The law firm of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, City Attorney for the City of La Quinta ("City Attorney"), is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and prosecute in the name of the City such proceedings in a court having proper jurisdiction thereof, as may be necessary for the acquisition of the Property described herein, including without limitation, seeking prejudgment possession of such Property, and to prepare and file such pleadings, documents, and otherwise prosecute such actions as may be necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to acquire the Property for the City. Such attorneys are specifically authorized to take whatever steps and/or procedures as are available to them under the Eminent Domain Law of the State of California, relating to acquisition of the Property. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following, vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DONALD O. ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 119/015610-0008 ry 529168.01 a08/UM 13 ( f City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 8 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 119/015610-0008 529168.01 a08/13/04 4 08-09-2004 04:11PM FROM- T-072 P.000/010 F-116 RBF CONSULTING 74-410 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 JEFFERSON STREET RIGHT4Y-WAY (APN 649-09041a and 6494=411) January 21, 2004 JN 20-1003Q7-SS Page 1 of 1 Those certain portions of land situated in the City of La Ouinta. County of Riverside, State of Califomia, being portions of the nortlTwest quarter of Section 20, Township 5 South, Range 7 Fast, - San Bernardino Meridian, described as Parcel 10 in the Grant peed recorded January 20, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-020204 and the land described in the Grant Deed recorded May 24, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-198208, both of Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, Califomia, included within a strip of land 16.00 feet wide, the westerly line of which is described an folkmm: A line parallel with and 44.00 feet easterly of the centerline of Jefferson Stmt as shown on the map of Parcel Nap No. 28489 filed in Book 192, Pages 53 through 57 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the County Recorder. Said strip of lard shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate northerly In the southerly line of Lot 31 Tract No. 2190 as shown on a rriap thereof filed in Book 41, Pages 55 through 57 of Maps In the said Office of the County Recorder and southerly in the southerly line of said Parcel 10 as described In said Grant Deed recorded January 20, 2000 as instrument No. 2000-020204. CONTAINING: 1,696 Square Feet. EXHIBIT "8" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-d-Way and Easements of Record. This description was prepared by me or under my direction. Levi David Cox, P.L.S. 7930 My license expires 12/31/05 M.VPATAQ010MrA4f nMQWM71Q 95-Vp4 LA ". "u, exR 1z1ei105, EXHIBIT J49 06-00-2004 04:11PM1 FROMi- T-0t2 P.010/010 F-116 ' INDICATES R.O.W. FOR jEFFERSON STREET 1,696 S.F. I l s j � � f r� Q ' Ma- LOT 31 NK qq TRACT MAP N O . 2190 U :z MB 4 1 / SS-57 C) vl) CIL FIESTA DRY fi0' PARCEL )0 44 ]NST.NO. 2000-020204 J.R. CC) U-) 16, oll U � D < I NW ! /4 SECTION 28 I T.5S, R.7E, S.S.M. u� I SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET PLAT TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL. OESCRIPTION �.�/>ra . o�•Isl. � soh•iRratl4lr FOR: JEFFERSON STREET 7*44r1OWAYx RIGHT—OF—WAY Ribs 2 Wasrawoaeeirr.CAMP .�m•o-+w (APN 649-090-010, 649-090-011) CONSULTING 7w.swr a • fw►)8Q3AW • WMMCM jAWARY 21. 2004 .t 20-100307-055 L EXHIBIT B _ __M 16-. 09-00-2004 04:09PM1 FROM T-972 P-002/010 F-110 RBF CONSULTING 74-410 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 September 17, 2003 JH 2O-100307 M6 Page 1 of 2 JEFFERSON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY A.A.H. # 601-080-013 That certain portion of land situated in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the west one-half of the northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 5 South, mange 7 East, San pernardino Meridian, described as Parcel 10 in a Grant Deed recorded May 25, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-198208 of Official Records in the Office of the County Retarder, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the centerline intersecdon of Westward Ho Drive and Jefferson Street, also being the northwest corner of said Section 28; thence along the centerline of said Jefferson Street, South 00106'13* East 53.02 feet; thence at right angles North 89°S3'47" East 44.00 feet, to a point on the easterly Right -of Way of Jefferson Street, also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along a line parallel to and 44.00 feet easterly of said centerline of Jefferson Street, South 00010613" East 306.98 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence along said curve southeasterly 31.42 feet through a central angle of 90000'00"; thence tangent from said curve and along a line parallel to and 25.00 feet north of the centerline of Palm Circle Drive, North 89°53'47" East 6.00 feet; thence North 46013'37" West 13.87 feet, to a line parallel to and 60.00 feet east of said centerline of Jefferson Street; thence along said line North 0060813" West 327.75 feet; thence North 46"01'36" East 13.88 feet to a line parallel to and 33.00 feet south of the centerline of Westward Ho Drive; thence along said line South 89°54'39" West 8.00 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 20.00 feet; n:vOATM2010�307v�urMueQlb►'1071pi00s +rpq EXHIBIT C 17 1 v I 08-09-2004 04:08PN FROW T-072 P.003/010 F-116 JEFFERSON STREET RIGHT OF WAY September 17, 2003 JN 20-100307 M6 Page 2 of 2 thence along said curve 31.42 feet through a central angle of 90°00'52" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 5,476 Square Feet, more or less. EXHIBIT "R" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights -of -Way and Easements of Record. This description was prepared by me or under my direction. Levi David .l..S. 7930 My license explres 12/31 /03. o!waIf-10 18 _ JJ4. 08-06-2004 04:08PM1 FROW T-072 P.004/010 F-110 i INDICATES R.O.w• FOR jEFFERSON STREET 5.478 S.F. p INDICATES 44' R.O.W. AS DEDICATED PER TRACT NO.2180 RECORDED IN BOOK 41 PAGES 37 TrAouGm 39 OF MAPS. IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER. 0 a• DATA TABLE BEARING/DELTA RADIUS LENGTm 1 90 00'52 20.00' 31.42' 2 S89'54'39 w -- 6.00' 3 N46 01'M E -- 13.88' 4 N48 13'37*** -- 13.87' 5 N89 53 ' 4 "IE -- 6.00 ' 6 90'00'00 20.00' 31.42' P.O.C. c t Nr C/L WESTWARD HO DRIVE N Iv89654'39"E •. Y a 1 2 M 'n / N89 ° 54 ' S9 "E PN89'53'47"E 3 44.00' T.P.0.B. 44 ' rO '� 0 v PQNQ�pN Z� o i' i CINLLJ N� • 0�� Q ate- o fi0 4 N89'53'47"E 6 5 h N89.53 4.7E C/L PALM CIRCLE DRIVE SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET Pb.I►NNINA ■ OMMAN ■ CONSTRUCTION QLAT TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR RIGHT—OF—WAY FOR ■ ■ ■ �' 0""�'""A>a rAl.w oesgYr. c^fcnW► 9rlaa-4M ,JEFFERSON STREET IN THE C o N 8 u LTI N G 76oa4674n - PAX M34U= • ,wnrwRQ OM CITY OF LA OUINTA DATE- SEPTEINBER 17. 2003 . k 20- 700307-US I is EXHIBIT D _ 19 ,��;3 M LEGAL DESCRIPTION The real property and improvements thereon situated in the State of California, County of Riverside, City of La Quinta, are described as follows: Lot 19 of Tract 2190, as Shown by Map on File in Book 41, Pages 55, 56 and 57 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. Excepting Therefrom the South 35 Feet of Said Lot 19. Also Excepting Therefrom the Following Described Property: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of Lot 18 of Said Tract; Thence South 0° 04' 39" East, 18.71 Feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 0° 04' 39" East, 95.00 Feet; Thence North 890 55' 21 ", 100.00 Feet to the East Line of Said Lot 19; Thence.North 0° 04' 39" West, 95.00 Feet; Thence South 89° 55' West, 100.00 Feet, to the True Point of Beginning. APN 649-071-010 ' EXHIBIT E 20 .��4 Lo PIN map GO-07 CMffAL ft"TV yM EXHIBIT F 21 08-08-2004 04:10PN FROW T-872 P.007/010 F-118 R13F CONSULTING 74.410 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 02260 JEFFERSON STREET TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (APN 649-M-010 and 6 49-090-011) January 14, 2004 JN 20-100307-57 Page 9 of 1 Those certain potions of land situated In the City of La Quanta, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, being portions of the northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 5 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian, described as Parcel 10 in the Grant Deed recorded January 20, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-020204 and the land described in the Grant Deed recorded May 24, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-198208, both of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, California, included within a strip of land 41.00 feet wide, the westerly line of which is described as follows: A line parallel with and 60.00 feet easterly of the centerline of Jefferson Street as shown on the map of Parcel Map No. 28469 filed In Book 192, Pages 53 through 57 of Parcel Maps In said Office of the County Recorder. Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate northerly in the southerly litre of Lot 31 Tract No. 2190 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 41, Pages 55 through 57 of Maps in the said Office of the County Recorder and southerly in the southerly line of said Parcel 10 as described in said Grant Deed recorded January 20, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-020204. CONTAINING: 4,590 Square Feet. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights. Rights -of -Way and Easements of Record. This description was prepared by me or under my direction. now Levi David Cox. .L.S. 7930 +►wo�� My license expires 12131 /05 La Me. jM om ialN116r, m%=DATA=iQM?"nm*amMwpa EXHIBIT G v JG 22 08-08-2004 04:10PM FRW- T-072 P.008/010 F-118 INDICATES T.C.E. FOR jEFFERSON STREET 41590 S.F. i l 1 U-) ! !< z LOT 31 I TRACT MAP Na. Is f I MS 41 / 55 .>7 U2 • .fir T ��� f-- C/L FIESTA DRIVIs' 14( I 44 f101 ' 60' PARCEL 10 z 1 1NST.NO. ! o W j 2000-020204 O.R. j 41' a d ! � 1 m � ! IOW 1 /4 SECTION 23 i T.5S, R.7E, S.S.M. I 1 SHEET 1 OF 1 SKEET PLAT TO ACCOMPANY A aGArr. DiTSCRIPTION FOR: w►rs1«..A • p•s10. • cow "��►''" JEFFERSON STREET fd3F TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT U-40 P"0 `"` (APN 649-090-0101 649-090-01 i C O N i LI LTI N G1 7rtn�lll�p • Mlt ma • wu1wQwn JAWARY 14. 2004 ft 20-100307-57 EXHIBIT H 23 f .- " ?J r 08-08-2004 04:08N FRW- T-8T2 P.005/010 F-116 r•1 A-, R13F CONSULTING 74-410 Highway 111 Palm pert, CA 92260 September 17, 2003 JN 20-100307 M6 Page 1 of 1 JEFFERSON STREET TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A.P.N. # 649-080-013 That certain portion of land situated in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, being a portion of the west one-half of the northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 5 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian, described as Parcel 10 in a Grant Deed recorded May 25, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-198208 of Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder, being a strip of land 10.00 feet in width, the easterly line described as follows: COMMENCING at the centerline intersection of Westward Ho Drive and Jefferson Street, also being the northwest comer of said Section 28: thence along the centerline of said Jefferson Street, South 00'06'13" East 33.02 feet; thence at right angles North 8905347" East 70.00 feet, to a point on the southerly Right -of -Way of Westward Ho Drive, also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along a line parallel to and 70.00 feet easterly of said centerline of Jefferson Street, South 00.08'130 East 346.98 feet to a point on the northerly right -of way of Palm Circle Drive, said point being the POINT OF TERMINATION. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion lying within Jefferson Street, 8o foot half width, Westward Ho Drive, 33 Foot half width, Palm Circle Drive, 25 foot half width. CONTAINING: 3.375 Square Feet, more or less. EXHIBIT ''B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights -of -Way and Easements of Record. This description was prepared by me or under my direction. r%7 Levi David x, P.L.S. 7930 My license expires 12131/03. n,P0ATA 1Q=fi%ftft&W7W0W--W EXHIBIT I -� 24 3 08-08-2004 04s10PM FROW T-072 P.006/010 F-116 If INDICATES T.C.E. FOR i* / JEFFERSON STREET 3.375 S.F. INDICATES 44' R.O.W. AS DEDICATED PER TRACT NO.2180 RECORDED IN BOOK 41 PAGES 37 THRO" 39 OF MAPS. IN Tt1E OFFICE OF Tt1E COUNTY RECORDER. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. �_, DATA TABLE BEARING/DELTA I RADIUS I LENGTM t S00 06't3"E -- 33.02' 2 N89'53'47''E -- 70.00' PLAT TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR JEFFERSON STREET IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA RE m C./L. INT . G/L WESTWARD HO DRIVE r° 54 ' 39"E T.P.o e.; N$9°54739"E ,O ro P! c$P�ti°d°�' to c tn rr! I g' r ' _ Ln 60' 10 s ,�. N89053'47"E ('V N89053'47"E C/L PALM CIRCLE DRIVE SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET PI,ANN11rA ■ D�liON ■ RQNATRr+RT�QN ■ ■ ■ 74-410 nra+wAY m PAW D IT. CA POI"A 02260-444 CONSULTING 780.3A74M ° FAx M30NO ° waxWcan PATE: SEPTEWER 17, 2003 -ft. 20-100307-M6 v EXHIBIT J 25 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLS TAMPIco LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 June 3, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Indian Springs Land Co., LLC 80227 Indian Springs Road Indio, CA 92201 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 Re: Offer to Acquire Property known as Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. APN 649-071-010 Gentlemen: The City of La Quinta (the "City") is proposing the construction of a widening and improvement of Jefferson Street, within the City. The City understands you are the vested owner of the above -referenced property. The City seeks to acquire the fee simple interest in the property, more particularly described as Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. APN 649-071- 010 as shown on map attached hereto as Attachment "A", which is made part of this offer by reference (the "Property"). This letter contains an offer by the City to acquire the Property, and the terms and conditions on which it proposes to do so. No final determination has been made at this point by the City as to the ownership of the Property. The City is in the process of securing information from a title company which will assist in determining exactly who the current owners are, and what other persons or entities may have lease, financing, or other interests in the property. Any acceptance of this offer is contingent upon your presentation to the City of conclusive evidence that all parties with interests in the Property (including, but not limited to, lessees, licensees, lienholders, etc.) have accepted this offer, and agreed on how the proceeds for the acquisition of the Property shall be distributed. The City had the Property appraised to determine its fair market value. The appraisal was conducted by Mr. Michael Scarcella, MAI, of Capital Realty Analysts, in accordance with commonly accepted appraisal standards, and included consideration of the highest and best use of the land. Mr. Scarcella previously corresponded with you, offering to meet with you on his inspection of the Property, and inviting you to provide information regarding the Property. Based on the appraisal, the City offers to purchase the Property (free and clear of any encumbrances to title such as liens, leases, licenses, or other interests which, in the City's discretion, are unacceptable) for SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE 119/0156104M 511028.01 W"3/04 :i ATTACHMENT 1 Indian Springs Land Co., LLC June 3, 2004 Page 2 DOLLARS ($7,395.00) (the "Purchase Price"). The basis for this offer is explained more thoroughly in Attachment B of this letter. Attachment "B" is a copy of the appraisal report prepared by Mr. Scarcella, containing the data and pertinent discussion relative to how he determined the fair market value of the Property. It is made a part of this offer by reference. . This offer is for conveyance to the City of a fee interest in the Property, excluding any oil, gas, or mineral rights below the depth of 500 feet, and subject to terms and conditions set out below. Payment will be made when the title to the Property vests in the City free and clear of all recorded or unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments, leases and taxes, except: 1. Taxes for the year in which the Property is purchased, which shall be cleared and paid in the manner required by Section 5086 of the Revenue of Taxation Code, if unpaid at the time escrow closes; 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of record, that do not interfere with the City's proposed use of the Property, as determined by the City; 3. Easements of rights -of -way over the land for public or quasi -public utility or public street purposes, if any; and 4. Any other interests in the Property or exceptions to title appearing on a preliminary title report or litigation guarantee, which are accepted by the City in writing through escrow. It shall be your responsibility to convey clear title, and to pay any fees or charges by lenders or other parties in obtaining reconveyances or other items necessary to convey clear title. As a condition of this offer, the City reserves all rights and. remedies it may have against you, and all prior owners, to seek damages or other remedies in connection with any remediation or other obligation the City incurs as a result of any contamination, as may be permitted or authorized by any law, including but not limited to CERCLA (42 U.S.C. Sub -Section 9601 et seq.), the Hazardous Waste Control Law, California Health & Safety Code (Section 25100, et seq.) the Porter Cologne Act (California Water Code Section 13000 et seq.) California Health & Safety Code Sections 25280 et seq. and 33459 et seq., and the provisions of Proposition 65. The City will pay all escrow and recording fees incurred in the purchase of the Property, and if title insurance is obtained, the premium charge for such title insurance. Please let us know as soon as possible if the City's offer is acceptable. This offer shall expire if it is not accepted on or before thirty (30) days from the date it has been mailed to you. If this offer is acceptable to you, please so indicate to the undersigned, in writing. Upon receipt of your written acceptance, a Purchase and Sale Agreement incorporating the terms of this offer, and containing further escrow instructions regarding review and elimination of exceptions to title, will be forwarded to you for signature. Upon receipt of a signed Purchase and Sale Agreement, the matter will be reviewed by City Council, which has final approval authority. If 119/01 % 10-M 511028.01 &M31W 27 16 Indian Springs Land Co., LLC June 3, 2004 Page 3 the deal is approved by the City Council, escrow will be opened immediately. The City generally uses First American Title Company to handle escrows, and proposes this company handle any escrow here. The City is, of course, willing to consider other escrow companies, if you so desire. If for any reason you are not satisfied with this offer of just compensation, and have relevant information regarding the value of the Property that you would like the City to consider, it will be happy to do so. If you have such information, please contact me immediately and.I will make arrangements to have the information reviewed and considered. If you have any questions regarding this offer, or wish to request any additional information, you may contact our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, at (760) 772-4255. Please note that effective August 1, 2003, the new telephone number for these consultants will be (760) 776- 1238. . Please note that the City has made no decision to exercise its power of eminent domain to acquire the Property, and can only do so after it holds a hearing at which the affected property owner(s) have had an opportunity to appear and be heard. The City much prefers to accomplish its property acquisitions by way of negotiated transactions, and toward the end of doing so with respect to this Property, would be more than willing to meet with you to discuss this offer, or any related matter. If for any reason you should see fit not to accept the City's offer, please be advised that this letter, the offer made herein, the Attachments, and all matters stated herein are made under the provisions of Evidence Code §§ 1152 and 1154, and shall not be admissible in evidence in any proceeding which may be instituted relating to the acquisition of the Property, or in any - other action. We hope this offer meets with your approval. As stated, our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, will be happy to meet with you to discuss the Property, the offer, or any related matter, and will attempt to contact you soon. If you need additional information, please call me at the number referenced above. Thank you. Very truly yours, CITY OF LA QUINTA e ity Attorney City oydl aQuinta 119/015610-M 511028.01 &M3/04 28 J 4. i4 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 June 8, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Indian Springs Land Co., LLC 80227 Indian Springs Road Indio, CA 92201 (760) 777-7000 (TDD) (760) 777-1227 Re: Offer to Acquire a Portion of Property known as Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. APN 649-090-010 and 649-080-013 Gentlemen: The City of La Quinta (the "City") is proposing the construction of a widening and improvement of Jefferson Street, within the City. The City understands you are the vested owner of the above -referenced properties. The City seeks to acquire the fee simple interest of approximately 493 square feet as to Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. APN 649-090-010 and approximately 5,476 square feet as to Riverside County Assessor Parcel No. APN 649-080- 013, together with temporary construction easements of approximately 3,375 square feet and 305 square feet, more particularly described in the legal descriptions and maps attached hereto as Attachment "A", which is made part of this offer by reference (the "Property'). This letter contains an offer by the City to acquire the Property, and the terms and conditions on which it proposes to do so. No final determination has been made at this point by the City as to the ownership of the Property. The City is in the process of securing information from a title company which will assist in determining exactly who the current owners are, and what other persons or entities may have lease, financing, or other interests in the property. Any acceptance of this offer is contingent upon your presentation to the City of conclusive evidence that all parties with interests in the Property (including, but not limited to, lessees, licensees, lienholders, etc.) have accepted this offer, and agreed on how the proceeds for the acquisition of the Property shall be distributed. The City had the Property appraised to determine its fair market value. The appraisal was conducted by Mr. Michael Scarcella, MAI, of Capital Realty Analysts, in accordance with commonly accepted appraisal standards, and included consideration of the highest and best use of the land. Mr. Scarcella previously corresponded with you, offering to meet with you on his inspection of the Property, and inviting you to provide information regarding the Property. 119/0156104M 5 12397.0106//004 ATTACHMENT 2 29 Indian Springs Land Co., LLC June 8, 2004 Page 2 Based on the appraisal, the City offers to purchase those portions of the Properties (free and clear of any encumbrances to title such as liens, leases, licenses, or other interests which, in the City's discretion, are unacceptable) for FORTY-ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS AND FORTY-THREE CENTS ($41,120.43) (the "Purchase Price"). The basis for this offer is explained more thoroughly in Attachment B of this letter. Attachment "B" is a copy of the appraisal report prepared by Mr. Scarcella, containing the data and pertinent discussion relative to the fair market value of the Property. It is made a part of this offer by reference. This offer is for conveyance to the City of a fee interest in the Property, excluding any oil, gas, or mineral rights below the depth of 500 feet, and subject to terms and conditions set out below. Payment will be made when the title to the Property vests in the City free and clear of all recorded or unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments, leases and taxes, except: 1. Taxes for the year in which the Property is purchased, which shall be cleared and paid in the manner required by Section 5086 of the Revenue of Taxation Code, if unpaid at the time escrow closes; 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of record, that do not interfere with the City's proposed use of the Property, as determined by the City; 3. Easements of rights -of -way over the land for public or quasi -public utility or public street purposes, if any; and 4. Any other interests in the Property or exceptions to title appearing on a preliminary title report or litigation guarantee, which are accepted by the City in writing through escrow. It shall be your responsibility to convey clear title, and to pay any fees or charges by lenders or other parties in obtaining reconveyances or other items necessary to convey clear title. As a condition of this offer, the City reserves all rights and remedies it may have against you, and all prior owners, to seek damages or other remedies in connection with any remediation or other obligation the City incurs as a result of any contamination, as may be permitted or authorized by any law, including but not limited to CERCLA (42 U.S.C. Sub -Section 9601 et seq.), the Hazardous Waste Control Law, California Health & Safety Code (Section 25100, et seq) the Porter Cologne Act (California Water Code Section 13000 et seq.) California Health & Safety Code Sections 25280 et seq. and 33459 et seq., and the provisions of Proposition 65. The City will pay all escrow and recording fees incurred in the purchase of the Property, and if title insurance is obtained, the premium charge for such title insurance. Please let us know as soon as possible if the City's offer is. acceptable. This offer shall expire if it is not accepted on or before thirty (30) days from the date it has been mailed to you. If this offer is acceptable to you, please so indicate to the undersigned, in writing. Upon recei t of your written acceptance, a Purchase and Sale Agreement incorporating p � rporatmg the terms of this offer, 119/015610-M 512397.01 a06/ VO4 30 A L Indian Springs Land Co., LLC June 8, 2004 Page 3 and containing further escrow instructions regarding review and elimination of exceptions to title, will be forwarded to you for signature. Upon receipt of a signed Purchase and Sale Agreement, the matter will be reviewed by City Council, which has final approval authority. If the deal is approved by the City Council, escrow will be opened immediately. The City generally uses First American Title Company to handle escrows, and proposes this company handle any escrow here. The City is, of course, willing to consider other escrow companies, if you so desire. If for any reason you are not satisfied with this offer of just compensation, and have relevant information regarding the value of the Property that you would like the City to consider, it will be happy to do so. If you have such information, please contact me immediately and I will make arrangements to have the information reviewed and considered. If you have any questions regarding this offer, or wish to request any additional information, you may contact our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, at (760) 776-1238. Please note that the City has made no decision to exercise its power of eminent domain to acquire the Property, and can only do so after it holds a hearing at which the affected property owner(s) have had an opportunity to appear and be heard. The City much prefers to accomplish its property acquisitions by way of negotiated transactions, and toward the end of doing so with respect to this Property, would be more than willing to meet with you to discuss this offer, or any related matter. If for any reason you should see fit not to accept the City's offer, ' please be advised that this letter, the offer made herein, the Attachments, and all matters stated herein are made under the provisions of Evidence Code § § 1152 and 1154, and shall not be admissible in evidence in any proceeding which may be instituted relating to the acquisition of the Property, or in any other action. We hope this offer meets with your approval. As stated, our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, will be happy to meet with you to discuss the Property, the offer, or any related matter, and will attempt to contact you soon. If you need additional information, please call me at the number referenced above. Thank you. Very truly yours, CITY OF LA QU TA . Katilerine Jenso ity Attorney City of La Quints 119/0136104= S 12397.01 a0610&104 31 r t � 36V V . P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 July 27, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7003 1680 0000 9821 2005 Supper Club Golf LLC 80-227 Indian Springs Road Indio, CA 92201 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 Re: Offer to Acquire a Portion of Property known as Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010 and 649-090-011 Gentlemen: The City of La Quinta (the "City") is proposing the construction of a widening and improvement of Jefferson Street, within the City. The City understands you are the vested owner of the above -referenced property. The City seeks to acquire the fee simple interest of approximately 1,696 square feet of the property, together with a temporary construction easement over 4,590 square feet of the property, as more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Attachment "A", which is made part of this offer by reference (the "Property"). This letter contains an offer by the City to acquire the Property, and the terms and conditions on which it proposes to do so. No final determination has been made at this point by the City as to the ownership of the Property. The City is in the process of securing information from a title company which will assist in determining exactly who the current owners are, and what other persons or entities may have lease, financing, or other interests in the property. Any acceptance of this offer is contingent upon your presentation to the City of conclusive evidence that all parties with interests in the Property (including, but not limited to, lessees, licensees, lienholders. etc.) have accepted this offer, and agreed on how the proceeds for the acquisition of the Property shall be distributed. The City had the Property appraised to determine its fair market value. The appraisal was conducted by Mr. Michael . Searcella, MAI, of Capital Realty Analysts, in accordance with commonly accepted appraisal standards, and included consideration of the highest and best use of the land. Mr. Scarcella previously corresponded with you, offering to meet with you on his inspection of the Property, and inviting you to provide information regarding the Property. Based on the appraisal, the City offers to purchase that portion of the Property (free -and clear of any encumbrances to title such as liens, leases, licenses, or other interests which, in the City's 119/015610-0008 r-, ,-. 523939.01 a07/I5/04 ATTACHMENT 3 32 .j b G Supper Club Golf LLC July 27, 2004 Page 2 discretion, are unacceptable) for TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND EIGHTY-ONE DOLLARS ($22,081.00) (the "Purchase Price"). The basis for this offer is explained more thoroughly in Attachment B of this letter. Attachment "B" is a copy, of the appraisal report prepared by Mr. Scarcella, containing the data and pertinent discussion relative to the fair market value of the Property. It is made a part of this offer by reference. This offer is for conveyance to the City of a fee interest in the Property, excluding any oil, gas, or mineral rights below the depth of 500 feet, and subject to terms and conditions set out below. Payment will be made when the title to the Property vests in the City free and clear of all recorded or unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments, leases and taxes, except: 1. Taxes for the year in which the Property is purchased, which shall be cleared and paid in the manner required by Section 5086 of the Revenue of Taxation Code, if unpaid at the time escrow closes; 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of record, that do not interfere with the City's proposed use of the Property, as determined by the City; 3. Easements of rights -of -way over the land for public or quasi -public utility or public street purposes, if any; and 4. Any other interests in the Property or exceptions to title appearing on a preliminary title report or litigation guarantee, which are accepted by the City in writing through escrow. It shall be your responsibility to convey clear title, and to pay any fees or charges by lenders or other parties in obtaining reconveyances or other items necessary to convey clear title. As a condition of this offer, the City reserves all rights and remedies it may have against you, and all prior owners, to seek damages or other remedies in connection with any remediation or other obligation the City incurs as a result of any contamination, as may be permitted or authorized by any law, including but not limited to CERCLA (42 U.S.C. Sub -Section 9601 et seq.), the Hazardous Waste Control Law, California Health & Safety Code (Section 25100, et seq.) the Porter Cologne Act (California Water Code Section 13000 et seq.) California Health & Safety Code Sections 25280 et seq. and 33459 et seq., and the provisions of Proposition 65. The City will pay all escrow and recording fees incurred in the purchase of the Property, and if title insurance is obtained, the premium charge for such title insurance. Please let us know as soon as possible if the City's offer is acceptable. This offer shall expire if it is not accepted on or before thirty (30) days from the date it has been mailed to you. If this offer is acceptable to you, please so indicate to the undersigned, in writing. Upon receipt of your written acceptance, a Purchase and Sale Agreement incorporating the terms of this offer, and containing further escrow instructions regarding review and elimination of exceptions to title, will be forwarded to you for signature. Upon receipt of a signed Purchase and Sale 119/015610-0008 523939.01 a07/15/04 33 e- V �, * "1 J 1 Supper. Club Golf LLC July 27, 2004 Page 3 Agreement, the matter will be reviewed by City Council, which has final approval authority. If the deal is approved by the City Council, escrow will be opened immediately. The City generally uses First American Title Company to handle escrows, and proposes this company handle any escrow here. The City is, of course, willing to consider other escrow companies, if you so desire. If for any reason you are not satisfied with this offer of just compensation, and have relevant information regarding the value of the Property that you would like the City to consider, it will be happy to do so. If you have such information, please contact me immediately and I will make arrangements to have the information reviewed and considered. If you have any questions regarding this offer, or wish to request any additional information, you may contact our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, at (760) 776-123 8. Please note that the City has made no decision to exercise its power of eminent domain to acquire the Property, and can only do so after it holds a hearing at which the affected property owner(s) have had an opportunity to appear and be heard. The City much prefers to accomplish its property acquisitions by way of negotiated transactions, and toward the end of doing so with respect to this Property, would be more than willing to meet with you to discuss this offer, or any related matter. If for any reason you should see fit not to accept the City's offer, please be advised that this letter, the offer made herein, the Attachments, and all matters stated herein are made under the provisions of Evidence Code § § 1152 and 1154, and shall not be admissible in evidence in any proceeding which may be instituted relating to the acquisition of the Property, or in any other action. We hope this offer meets with your approval. As stated, our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, will be happy to meet with you to discuss the Property, the offer, or any related matter, and will attempt to contact you soon. If you need additional information, please call me at the number referenced above. Thank you. Very truly yours, CITY OF LA U TA M. Kathe ne Jenson, City Att City of La Quinta 119/015610-0008 523939.01 a07/15/04 5U� 34 P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 July 26, 2004 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED Indian Springs Land Co., LLC 80227 Indian Springs Road Indio, California 92201 Attn: Donald Olson (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 Re: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NL%MERS 649-090-010, 649-080-0139 Am 649-071-010 Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located Along Jefferson Street In La Quinta, California Dear Property Owner or Tenant: This notice is sent to you under the requirements of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. This notice concerns the City of La Quinta's plans to consider acquiring, by eminent domain, the property located along Jefferson Street, in the City of La Quinta, which are portions of Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010, 649-080-013, and 649-071-010 (the "Property"). The City of La Quinta has been investigating the acquisition of this Property for the widening of Jefferson Street, Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase H. Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project 2000-19 (the "Project'). California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030 provides that a City may exercise the Power of eminent domain to acquire property for a proposed public project if the following conditions are established: A. The public improvement and necessity require the project. B. The project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the great public good and the least private injury.* C. The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner of record. E. The City has complied with all other procedural requirements for utilizing the power of eminent domain to acquire the property, including review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). 119/015610-0OOf 527M.01.07l16 04 ATTACHMENT 4 Indian Springs Land Co., I:LC Attn: Donald Olson July 26, 2004 Page 2 This notice is sent to inform you that the City Council of the City of La Quinta will be asked to decide if the above conditions have been met, concerning the City's acquisition of the above - referenced Property, A Public hearing will be held at or about 7:00 p.m. on Au 17 2004 in ip the City Council Chambers located at 78-495 Calle Tam co La Bust ' this Purpose. If the City Council finds that these conditionQuints' California 92253, for be asked to adopt a resolution of necessity, which is apertys have been met' the City Council will eminent domain proceedings to acquire pro prerequisite for the City's initiation of . For your information and convenience, a legal description of the property is attached to this notice. Please be advised that you are entitled to appear and be heard on any of the matters encompassed within the resolution, and specifically those matters listed above. The City asks ing not less than fifteen (15) days before thescheduled provide hearing date, but your failure to meet this fifteen -day time frame will not result in eduled notice that you intend to do so in writ refusal to consider any points you may wish to make at the hearing. You may City's request with the City Clerk of the Cityof La Y make this written California 92253. Please take notice that if ��' 78-495 Cane Tampico, La Quints, You wish to legally challenge any action taken by the adoption of the resolution of necessity, or any of the findings or matters included within i including the City's right to use eminent domain to acquire the pro t' court to raising only those issues raised at the resolution of necessity hearing, you may be .limited in correspondence delivered to the City no less than fifteen days riohe�g� or in written Y P to the hearing on the matter. The City must adopt a resolution of necessity before -an eminent domainProceeding continence. Within six months after the adoption of a resolution of necesican commence eminent domain in the Riversidenecessity, the City may . In an such County Superior Court, Indio Branch. Y P the court will be asked to determine the amount of just compensation to ou may be entitled i which yn the event the Property is taken in eminent domain. For your information, on August 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of La Quinta Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to �t� Study/Mitigated Q� adoptod Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99-3 78 (State clearinghouseNo. Negative II of the Jefferson Street Improvements se 9903104� -Phase P (segment between Highway 111 and Westward Ho Drive). On Au 2003 the City filed a Notice of Determination August 20, te;rtninatzon regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk in compliance with Section 21152 of th Public Resources Code. The Addendum found that no effects on the environment are anticipatede that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance as a result of this Project based on the previously certified Mitigation Measures adopted by the City Council on May 18, l 999 and Resolution 99-66. The Addendum further supports that the Project modifications involv er not result in significant environmental im ed will CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes ' �e A►ddeadum was prepared in accordance with no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition and construction of the proposed roadway improvements. In consideringthe resolution of necessity, the La Quinta City Council will be asked to utilize this Addedum along 119ro15610.o00 527M.01 .OVUM 36 .: E 1 Indian Springs Land Co., LLC Attn: Donald Olson July 26, 2004 Page 3 with the original Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99- 378. The Addendum, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99-378, and Resolution No. 2003-076 are available for inspection and copying at La Quints City Hall, Public Works Department, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. In addition, please be advised that on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific dt Cutler, Inc. Copies of the relocation plan are available for review at the same address noted above. Pleasethat neither the pendency of the City's consideration of the resolution of necessity, nor the possible uutiation of formal eminent domain proceedings, in any way prevents Rather negotiations from occurring for the acquisition of your Property, and the City is most willing to continue such negotiations. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, Kathy Jenson, at (714) 641-3413. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very holy yo Me J City Attorney, City of La Quints Attachment — Legal Descriptions IINIS610�000� 327M.01 .o /XM I Pie Afto so." C41 AL ftaTY AlmLyM PAUL Brft=Anmum oAMALv=,AwjnM 38 _ *z.T .L�WIWI The real property, and improvements thereon situated in the State of California, County of Riverside, City of La Qwnta, are described as follows: Lot 19 of Tract 2190, as Shown by Map on File in Book 41, Pages 55, 56 and 57 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California Excepting Therefrom the South 35 Feet of Said Lot 19. Also Excepting Therefrom the Following Described Property: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of Lot 18 of Said Tract; Thence South 0° 04' 39" East, 18.71 Feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 0° 04' 39" East, 95.00 Feet; Thence North 890 55' 21 ",100.00 Feet to the East Line of Said Lot 19; Thence NNorth 00 04' 39" West, 95.00 Feet; Thence South 890 55' West, 100.00 Feet, to the True point of Beginning. APN 649-071-010 39� s7 3 SubJW Property APN 641.-O0-013 Eas�ntWalt Map ' . I�ICsnct R.o. r. ra . , .anellor snitsi s..� s.r. 0 IN"= M' N.G.B. a =I"= RN am 14.21D facom w am-6t^I=-V"fAMiar we. Ip we wria w Ili 20 21 _0_. C/L wESTNAM HO OR! VE /NN•:r'390E 29 21 g t 2 A H-- --- i = W9054'390E 09053'470E / --fir J lei Not IMTA TRW s LO trea�rmr� +�r�s �s•sn, _ 1 G we9.53'476E _ s Cit PAW Cin= ming EXhW PLAY TO ACCOMPANY A a a Osamu • ""Olnusnw LHAL OElCOPIfON /aRPF z �pft-01'-IVAI► fOle K W LA Si1ET IN THE QONwY6TIN• am Z"Da u. nu .�► aarooue�s C MAL RMTV AHALYM Rw, EtrA= Avjvj0kwot • AwLLVM. AWANn IjAy 40 �. ►a, 4 4 Subject Property APN 649-M-013 Essimnt Lopi Dwdptlon C k4iiof Aw 74-mo Rk "M wm aa�sabar 17, �w mxmwrairpop 1692 .w�aoid $Rwrr.wi►Y APA0 as Tw O"m powon or find @NNW in �.c�, d La .O *ft G10 w or am d ` a d Mr wt onr�o/ai wo wdwrt 4ww d •odoe x Taritl� "W a as ft d000 Ji d oftM 11�aa� w O b, ai d-OM" Aowdar, aw�a 0►rroiMd as �iowr Syr C01MrUQtV1N at MO oorMriw ilwaso m of wea wd Ma a" and JWalaon arm, ate bft rw mw wt ooAlardaam •adeaJft Mr�oa d*V ba aonlMiw d oaid d Wm ftOK $NO WN W Scot no ftft al *M W toa *a UVF4r ffM 44 "t IDS pai m swam* 1141d.01�.W� d .Ia�o�aon ONK aro Mw wa mm pfff CMS � •ad1 OO�r6ot�MdNtb pointaa �d � d.lat#won �� a loan or3100INC wa did � Mraaatap satd auwa aowlw..tr4r �t.� b.t Mia+Oh a wibalan0lad IO,OO�Or; Imme ar�ib *m Numaw"WOr'p+avITalmeiot a sa mam to aad nm1oateaAA orNa orMriiw wr.t w.�, b a t�wp.�dr b aed OQ00 tnatwt dsatdaanlrt mum a"said"NOM 00'M r vim X7.M tam tawloa IMorb Mb1 t 1 loaf baiwpr - to MM UN fat MO a1 •w dWWWa d Ma OMw ftnoa atw aaw an "a WOW Vim M Am b a poid w a trpa-0 aura aowraoW�rand haMAD • ndusd�Op � (tZ) CAMAL ft"TV Anu.Ys'ra Rw, BarATl Af1Luw e AWLVM. AV„ 41 8ubfect Property APN U9-M-013 Essm*nt Legal Ofscrlpdon SIMI cW WAT 17. am ++~w NP2Wi . �.■tr a�r+�. spas 180 woup, MUM a& a OWN b r�. nays PaWr Cr Dwr "�" allrrrd and er w� w�rr�aiadr a prt Arad :u1.1/CT ro at Gowirdd,l�A1� 1�'�y�► and d mod. Tm d alas poorod IV m w WNW xv avow L mom w ro.r w"W asim ��. CAMAL REALTY ANAi.YS" ft& WATE A/NA1 • AMLYM • ADVMM r. ,.Ai 42 SubjOd Property APN W480-013 TOmporary Construction ESSOmont Map u�IC71T(: T.C.L. ra .aroeoN srRIIi �.� :... O MICA1Q "' R.O.R. AS Q I"= 10 MAGI WSW FAMVM 0 M 11 IMES A "MM a w IMF. 0 ft CRic w we Cox" qma . Gamy OF Rnasia. aTA TAas tARNRMiA ? w•ss•.�t � as'ao. P.o.C. Zia r NO-54'3f"E 1-'- ---ttst, .`�..:ALEE —! ' NOD .J4 -39rG 8 d-owl � W 1r ~1 81 O � O 60 to t `r t NIO053'470E 14 PW*53@470E CA PAW CIrAU =1%C I IE)(hW SfEET i or r ga ILAT TO ACCOWANY A +w • Mww • enuenewe,m„ PF �MST/O�N art Jgn� R7, am,Ae s0-t04��1 (14) CA,PrrAL ftALTY Attu,,rsrY RLU 6TATi AwRum 9 AWi YM a Aovlma 43 377 Subject Property APN 13 TNnPorsry Construction E Lis! p�scriPtlon ascmcnt tfri oo�trw�►cnoN RANNNOW no aaildn paten of bud ON" in M a La , d ft- aim of mo SO Ihwirit AraaM� Mai wiAO° Aamuoir. dl�/ MA Mt M � on "Mil" doaorad ago of Me Como pO1 lI�10 at Mr arwrir iMnwaoran of WI�M�d Fb Me and J � . ao b t aorn.a.o�ld Mdop �"�'�► �� �aT �t 1aN � b a print a rr aourrr�r oftw"Nrr Hof o Ow" al lowbdin" soboloo I la raribiir d rgraftgraft 4�aw�at�nan pmkft" � Ckboba s.a wodvll , m l� /1�� Sob � r0�ootArllwi Ml d ��� a ---- CiONrA��t �i »arw �t snow arwa cif'!' all�drd and 1�► ar w�onoa �i � lrthr� 8MLM T7b w QwMwft ftw aid a/ Ilmd, � /�pwd 0I►a� or �r�doray draoroR Las 6s i" �15) CAMALAsr iTY AJVALV ra RagaftrAMArriaamw.Ax&vmo A8vMm 44 v+ II Subject Pro� perty APN .M410 EasNn�wit Map 0 m1101m .00 10.210 4� 10 M41►AM27AJMiO "ll. IN we O►Ict w >x =1l1 owsa RTAAm 1! WACT I'�0n cl n '� �o�os ar P nitm KSTwARo No DRI vE LOT 31 TRACT WV NO. 2190 10 41/ W57 160 A'N "t-080-010 OtANT DEED INV- NO. 2000-10M IBC. 05/24/20W FIAT 10 ACCWAMr A vkmws ' LEDAL aISC&Vrm Tort Brea-W-MY the RW SM 1 0i I m r • enema a w"OPOL4 n.n JV7MIM SIMMT IN THE • • • erRer .:r�.w� pTY LA 01011TA aamem ime �r� . FM B oAIL wlo= IS. MW on ao- looloo-+m I CAMTAI, RJULTY ANALYSM Rem. EsrrAn APM1A+W o Ah"v o A mnm 45 �, Subject Prgwrty APN 649-M-010 EmrNM Lopl p46cripdon MF GOMMw-0 �rtW d A*To Ropwasror m am .M MM~ M" . �oldl � Y Aix 0H Tlrt ortd� 0004 + o/ And dWW in ft of L• awift CM0 of ft Srb o/ awlaft s �4 7� i�ua w wool •n� M� nor��N q�rl�r r �ollo� Tows I1�oo�r. � poiraii�rdroaryE as flabw�r s humbug " of cam M'°01W 1n w Odor of Of Coar�r corr�lclN� aw w. •. . waowm dwashnd to ftw dow Arson WON, as � b �woot ooriord•d/ Sporn � wronal" w or an stow dMr on Shot, Sea oo-orlrrot I NLO J t M�nonNoiwM�O'�TSoof4�00�ot1oNnm�tdtd�f .7Ynat1�1�21Y0Aw r1 Soolc.l Hai Aa1,1�.bwoAo�drr•dd f�►Il�oonlOr, •olaooiita�o aft I•TMPawl MINDONAMft &Obb lb" Is ap*A* AND d•dd Lot 31 N" 08033W am 1TA2 64 l" i' rot SARI b •@pp" aMhol osawk of am ° of •N�rnon ftr•f� d OK Nielail/ auiN iow bars and• il•ftmi1r>nm ww41r� bait 1 17n lw a or11l1 � Op��T 10 • o0ilt •rlr�►d•d/ arrr r d.R♦Sr•on �1� � �Sati � rY oM NoM 00'r'1ir wwe 20.r trt b N• TigIE %$%mud Pint . ==r W ditdW aw Ur ft whoa w>•. • po 1w•eL VAMW 0a1 cwwd m 1 ,� �IIYrI►aidErrw dA000�d. aiml L •. 01.-g 1X 1 C* (17). CAMTAL RtALTY ANALYSTS Rw, ESTA75 A/raAnow. Ax"YM . ADVEM 46 Subjed Property APN 649-M-010 Tonpwwy Condmcdon Ea"mont Map • ��otauo r. c.s. ra SIM gar s.r. �w >�t r.rr r�41P�vW �rol�lot or� C NESTwAAD 1•b DR i VE owo>4 R7MC1O po vwa .... me. a aoaRV �'co�o� or :ca h - LOT 31 ! TR. MAP NO. 2190 ,� • W 41/ 55-37 i '� 9- CA FIESTA C RI VE I * 3'47"E '� 0f cum rt a •yea• .� �sc: ;r• YrY7o■a��►:� �� le*w RAT 1b ACCOMiWy A LEUL �MlTAYCTNMI LAWMNT = WFUM SIMI w Of CM Or LA DWYA �s i I AM 60-0/0-010 ��ANf OW lii -ND. 20WISM fa. 0404/3000 MFa � a eemwmwvm� a a a F*Nwlqb�m Goodau mm's ��� . w xw� 0 wmow� DAM AWW N. Ut it wwtwrm 8� CAMAL REALTY ANALYS7'E ft& ESTAT/ A//AM M • AmUvs : AWWU 47 Subject Property APN 64E6M.010 TOMPorary Construction Emwrncnt Leal DowApdon wsooNfNl�T OMM& CA WIN l ftooffa r a" Un Merv" '*A; ftle 1 of Thor orain potion of Ira *am b d ter d filo C�► La aWft CaMWOW 00 d a po�ron d�a wrt 4110 irdd Ilr nrowrtgmrlmr d ftaim ak Towiatdp Y�r�RaaRflanMoeiardl I'- Ids dmwftdnpmwwloins tiaMDaadwoa W r hNNOW it Na MMU M of am" ftmdo In fM CMao d Me C+aNw AorM�r. wwn prM4ily iooiead r tOMorc ©OI�NCaMN at Mo mft*a irrMoffon Of WO*md Na' D" wA imff ooa I &OK On Im" noAwrt Dolor dam orwon 3a fbonoa alo�p N. orrwrr d aw.i�roon flroaf; souw 00'i00'ir foot 11r.1a OaaR ftirrf►Io* r" w4rMaot4d.006d10 as1u0waolr0raomra/L@131.TmWPAy21900W b Sw* 41 P"w w wpph d7 4fA"w In b CMoo d rr aoY Corry► Iror�dor aoudwf!►ina d rid Lots1 Irarfh N�1'i7 that 17.12Iloat to TIC PONT OP 1111141111waft- �ow ip a m Ma and ao10% fa Of Lot 21 Noll N'SfW Im 1&0 Qaaf; tfionr � N'tN'1!'Moat00�ii aot b a poll an• orM aarioory �A d 2000A � a m" aw—d im no paint m.- Ma n atoll MM arN SIN O aWr 11A0 ftd Mrapb a dImW aqb d 00'12W%. awwopoat Mons ON awa *a 00-a r IMad =A to b to MR POW OF CiONlA/t - M qq� brat. m"w Ir mftdrd and er Oda mft i waft a pot I I at stftu■cTTo w CaMawroft mgift mmaMrr+Fwa�r ra E arm MR A n+ a•ro►�•d erar arv� wOr dti.wor� goI 1pir I Os) CAMTAL MALTY ANALYSTS Rai EITATa ArroArr . ANALYM. AD M= 48 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed by the law office of Rutan & Tucker, LIP in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age o€18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 611 Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth Floor, Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931. On July 26, 2004, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located Along Jetrerson Street In La Quinta, California by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below: Indian Springs Land Co., LLC 80227 Indian Springs Road Indio, CA 92201 Attn: Donald Olson In the course of my employment with Rutan dt Tucker, LLP, I have, through first-hand personal observation, become readily familiar with Rutan & Tucker, LLP's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice I deposited such envelope(s) in an out -box for collection by other personnel of Rutan dt Tucker, LLP, and for ultimate posting and placement with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. If the customary business practices of Rutan 8t Tucker, LLP with regard to collection and processing of correspondence and .mailing were followed, and I am confident that they were, such envelope(s) were posted and placed in the United States mail at Costa Mesa, California, that same date. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.** Executed on July 26, 2004, at Costa Mesa, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Lauren Ramey (Type or print name) ** Served by certified mail, return -receipt requested, article number 70031680 0000 M1 19856 )4"13610 = 49 1-' 8 ATTORNEYSTAN CKERt AT LAW M. Katherine Jenson Direct Dial: (714) 641-3413 E-mail: kjenson@rutan.com VIA FACSIMILE J. Donald Olson Executive Vice President Supper Club Golf, LLC 80-227 Indian Springs Drive Indio, California 92201 611 ANTON BOULEVARD, FOURTEENTH FLOOR COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1931 DIRECT ALL MAIL TO: POST OFFICE BOX 1950 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1950 TELEPHONE 714-641-5100 FACSIMILE 714-S46-9035 INTERNET ADDRESS www.rutan.com August 2, 2004 ORANGE COUNTY SILICON VALLEY (408) 269.8777 A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS Re: Portion of Property Known as County of Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010 and 649-090-011 City of La Quintals Notice of Intention to Adopt Resolution of Necessity for Acquisition of Certain Real Property Located Along Jefferson Street in La Quinta, California Dear Mr. Olson: This will confirm that you have agreed to the City of La Quinta holding the Public Hearing on the City's Notice of Intention to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity for Acquisition for the Property known as Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010 and 649-090-011 on August 17, 2004. Attached hereto please find the Notice of Intention Adopt a Resolution of Necessity. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, RU AN & TUCKERLCityLa LLP M. Ka Brine City AttorneyQuinta Enclosure cc: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Timothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer Bob Stoddard 119/015610-000S 528988.01 a08/02/04 ATTACHMENT 5 50 . t WAA P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 August 2, 2004 VIA FACSIMILE Supper Club Golf, LLC 80227 Indian Springs Road Indio, California 92201 Attn: Donald Olson (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 Re: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 649-090-010 AND 649-090-011 Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located Along Jefferson Street In La Quinta, California Dear Property Owner or Tenant: This notice is sent to you under the requirements of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. This notice concerns the City of La Quinta's plans to consider acquiring, by eminent domain, the property located along Jefferson Street, in the City of La Quinta, which are portions of Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010 and 649-090-011 (the "Property"). The City of La Quinta has been investigating the acquisition of this Property for the widening of Jefferson Street, Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project 2000-19 (the "Project"). California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030 provides that a City may exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire property for a proposed public project if the following conditions are established: A. The public improvement and necessity require the project. B. The project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the great public good and the least private injury. C. The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner of record. 119/01%10-M 520".01 &M2M 5 ,.. WAA P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 August 2, 2004 VIA FACSIMILE Supper Club Golf, LLC 80227 Indian Springs Road Indio, California 92201 Attn: Donald Olson (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 Re: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 649-090-010 AND 649-090-011 Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located Along Jefferson Street In La Quinta, California Dear Property Owner or Tenant: This notice is sent to you under the requirements of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. This notice concerns the City of La Quinta's plans to consider acquiring, by eminent domain, the property located along Jefferson Street, in the City of La Quinta, which are portions of Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 649-090-010 and 649-090-011 (the "Property"). The City of La Quinta has been investigating the acquisition of this Property for the widening of Jefferson Street, Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project 2000-19 (the "Project"). California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030 provides that a City may exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire property for a proposed public project if the following conditions are established: A. The public improvement and necessity require the project. B. The project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the great public good and the least private injury. C. The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner of record. 119/01%10-M 520".01 &M2M 5 ,.. Supper Club Golf LLC Attn: Donald Olson August 2, 2004 Page 2 E. The City has complied with all other procedural requirements for utilizing the power of eminent domain to acquire the property, including review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). This notice is sent to inform you that the City Council of the City of La Quinta will be asked to decide if the above conditions have been met, concerning the City's acquisition of the above - referenced Property. A Public hearing will be held at or about 7:00 p.m. on August 17, 2004, in the City Council Chambers located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, for this purpose. If the City Council finds that these conditions have been met, the City Council will be asked to adopt a resolution of necessity, which is a prerequisite for the City's initiation of eminent domain proceedings to acquire property. For your information and convenience, a legal description of the Property is attached to this notice. Please be advised that you are entitled to appear and be heard on any of the matters encompassed within the resolution, and specifically those matters listed above. The City asks that you provide notice that you intend to do so in writing not less than fifteen (15) days before the scheduled hearing date, but your failure to meet this fifteen -day time fi ne will not result in the City's refusal to consider any points you may wish to make at the hearing. You may make this written request with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253. Please take notice that if you wish to legally challenge any action taken by the adoption of the resolution of necessity, or any of the findings or matters included within it, including the City's right to use eminent domain to acquire the Property, you may be limited in court to raising only those issues raised at the resolution of necessity hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City no less than fifteen days prior to the hearing on the matter. The City must adopt a resolution of necessity before an eminent domain proceeding can commence. Within six months after the adoption of a resolution of necessity, the City may commence eminent domain proceedings in the Riverside County Superior Court, Indio Branch. In any such proceeding, the court will be asked to determine the amount of just compensation to which you may be entitled in the event the Property is taken in eminent domain. For your information, on August 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of La Quinta adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99-378 (State Clearinghouse No. 99031046) - Phase II of the Jefferson Street Improvements (segment between Highway 111 and Westward Ho Drive). On August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. The Addendum found that no effects on the environment are anticipated that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance as a result of this Project based on the previously certified Mitigation Measures adopted by the City Council on May 18,1999, under Resolution 99-66. The Addendum further supports that the Project modifications involved will 119/015610-M 528999.01 &08/02/N 52 Supper Club Golf LLC Attn: Donald Olson August 2, 2004 Page 3 not result in significant environmental impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition and construction of the proposed roadway improvements. In considering the resolution of necessity, the La Quinta City Council will be asked to utilize this Addendum, along with the original Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99- 378. The Addendum, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99-378, and Resolution No. 2003-076 are available for inspection and copying at La Quinta City Hall, Public Works Department, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. In addition, please be advised that on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. Copies of the relocation plan are available for review at the same address noted above. Please understand that neither the pendency of the City's consideration of the resolution of necessity, nor the possible initiation of formal eminent domain proceedings, in any way prevents further negotiations from occurring for the acquisition of your Property, and the City is most willing to continue such negotiations. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, Kathy Jenson, at (714) 641-3413 . Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Z ; /A/ /" M. Ka rin(s2 on City A orney, City of La Quinta Attachment — Legal Descriptions 119/015610.0008 528999.01 a08ro2iO4 53 387 Subject Property APN 645-090-010, 011 Easement Map f IWICATES R.O.N. FOR .97FERSON STREET 1.695 S.F. pp CO Nca p) I ci CL _ LOT 31 TRACT MAP NO. '+ m 2190 MB 41 / 55-57 O R' t� 1. SZOa soop I �9 CA AWa DRIVE r W 44' � 1 Al In -� i join i 0%. LL) Oki Uoc t t t a4. wm t U t Lf )ro AOOpM1Al11� A LLQAL 0[M/pN i0wo m smu Mrr-CF-wAr (m" 640-00-010. 649-090-011) PARCEL 10 INST.1110. 2000-020204 O.R. NW 1 /4 SECTION 28 T.5S, R.7E, S.B.M. SHUT 1 OF 1 SPEET w.www � ••��. • •�r•wr•w�w JAMMW 21. aW4 .Ac 20-V=7-M CAMTAL RzALTY ANAum Rw. ftrATS AMUAW • ANALYM • Aovt 54 v g Subject P rtY APN AAA -010-010, 011 Ess*rrwnt L.Gasl Dm ripdon RWCOIGMTM ?"s moomar111 Pawn Osw% CA WN Off f �A� Jaarary Z.um JO I N OON OTMT PaOs 1 d 1 MOMOF-MIAY OM 6*4I0W0 and S*Mo j) Thm cabin PC 900 of bed situabd in 90 COV of La QWnta Cox* of Rtiwtids. 8btr d Cd bnib. bov pordorisdo wWAWWdsaoron2%TOwrwldp a 80 ^ Rang 7E@K 8aa Oae— 0 0 MNidrn. - I I d as Paul t0 in tba Orant Ord --oordsd .berry 20. 21M as irriura d m& aDOa0M0W4 and Vw ftM me a b gn owd and rroord-d Mb► 24. 8000 as kVdRNW t No► 2000.1N2 & bob d OAtil Asoods b 0M ONO dta,w Couiq► R�oo�dsr d dufftb des w �m Nidi+tlad wwiin s alb of UM 1t.00 %a wider vw ""wo bw n AIMS wiw and d4.00 fat aaabry d f asnbrlrr d1-ft- SVM a Mown an h d dCoiP s�UWNILbr25l�Ibd;rw 1W. PdWWV o4Pa7dPaoMOAtslnYidC9J. saidawdbedsNaOkill, rIardoraho %n@dsoasbbra6dea0 bMraouiharyflea dLatal'nsotNo� Z1,oassAoia�on anrprisra0l>lsdN Ooaw41, Plpas86Mrapbb7dM�ps �' b Ms said Olb d Mr CarNr Rsoordarand =&W b ald Orant Oaad woads0 JwUq Z0 2000 � `N0». 200 10 as ds OOI�f rwMIM10k 1.00d 8puam Fist. �T "!' aiadiad and b!►wIs rrlbranoa nrda • part hs�aoL, MALMTTO a/ Caora unk. I oft ftft coWalr and Easarrnls of Raooid. Thb daao job was Oral W m ar lm dsr nw dlaoloa oar Lad ChK PJ 72 '— Aib► i4rw oipinss 1ZI.3U06 u�ww (12) CAMAL. RtALTY ANA[.YM ttaw. ftrAm ArrsmUa • Aw►LYM • AWMM 55 J�� Subject Property APN 641-ON U l0v 011 Timpoirmry Construction Easement Map INDITES STREET FOR JEF 4.500 S.F. I I I i I � o ri I I 4ztil LOT31 j a TRACT MAP NO. 2190 Zpg MB 411 55-57 ��g$ C� I 2,de Vol I r /I FL MA 44' DRli+B � cu �z� t t � _j I t • t a� I a � EXHW 'B' . ft0if M OACW~ JVWLUNSomml u c a9sc�n�ofr row TEAMRAW c0NSrnucTM E4KK T (Aft "t-000-010. 4149-010-011) PARCEL 10 t INST.NO. 2WO-020204 1a� O.R. i 41• i t I I t NW 1 /4 SECTION 28 t T.5S, R.7E, S.B.M. i SHEET I aF 1 94MT a owe IML M-49000me (13) CAMAL RZALTV A ALYSn 56 -t , f� Subject Property APN a4f-0N 0109 011 Temporary Construction Easenent Lpsl Description Rm 74410 MOhwey 111 Palns haw% CA f3if0 EX1#flf r JN u.10fw-a Pala 1 a/1 .IB�FEIgON UR W TEtWORMY Coin --RUCTION NA90MM (APN iM4hmm vw seed 600"1) Those antis on In -a of WA s koft! in ar Ck of Lai aura.. C u* o1 lihsselde Ste of Cal%rnia. bsisp posronsdwanosfswsatqusslardsaaras'f.Touishjs ssouw.Ibrspa 70a■t. fan Aso Alaridirr, dumbed as PwW 10 In fM leant Dud iwrdad Jwxwy aA XW sa kobwmd Na AoMO*4 as wW tAa land dnwbW in ft 0 dOssdatoordadMal►A MW a Msadsassant Na. 3fl00.1lS70fr bow d0�d■1 IleoNida in ft OAoa onn. C=x* Asmdw of aid M weida Cm*. CdFwnk hub" wNis a dldo Bland 41M bookie. fsf ti sftly w d wHoh is deaarbad a floor A ins peralel NN and SM feat nsiq b d fr os rlwlna d. effa mn Swat as shown on ft mpdPWWMmpN&21 wad b @oM 1SZ. Pa0n53rrosplsS7 d Reel ftaln and ORoa Said aWdAwl shellbalaspfwrd ardulaned soaa to lwomb b ow soulfw*60 dLot31TmdN&2INftslsownananapl - -n ad N0ook41.F"wSSfnotwh07dUps b t o =M Cdfoa dfr Cm* RmmdormW m wb b fra sa*w kw dsaid ParoN 10 r desabed b ail Omt Osed taPmed Jawwy 2l% 2 o as &mou awjt No: 200!}000m04. OONfA--- 4= Squra Fist DO f "r' aaadsad and bywr I On na" s part l m L SNw.i�TTo ai CaMrss�Ma. R�Ma. A�INfd Mhp►and EiaamwMa d Naoord. Ift dssalkfon was g I by me or underawd edim s. Lari Oswid c 7f 0 W lkm s sop' 1201M u�saaa �visor 0 (14) CAnTAL ftaTy ANAL.y m RML BarAa A • Awu.Ysrs. Aovuoaa 57 4 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL AND FACSIMILE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed by the law office of Rutan & Tucker, LLP in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 611 Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth Floor, Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931. On August 2, 2004, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located Along Jefferson Street, In La Quint&, California by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below: Supper Club Golf, LLC 80227 Indian Springs Road Indio, California 92201 Attn: Donald Olson In the course of my employment with Rutan & Tucker, LLP, I have, through first-hand personal observation, become readily familiar with Rutan & Tucker, LLP's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice I deposited such envelope(s) in an out -box for collection by other personnel of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, and for ultimate posting and placement with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. If the customary business practices of Rutan & Tucker, LLP with regard to collection and processing of correspondence and mailing were followed, and I am confident that they were, such envelope(s) were posted and placed in the United States mail at Costa Mesa, California, that same date. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I also caused the above document(s) to be transmitted by facsimile machine, telephone number 714-546-9035, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 2005. The facsimile machine I used complied with Rule 2003(3) and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to Rule 2008(e), I caused the machine to print a record of the transmission. Said fax transmission occurred as stated in the transmission record and was directed as stated above. Executed on August 2, 2004, at Costa Mesa, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Lauren Ramey (Type or print name) (Signature) k* Served by certified mail, return -receipt requested, article number 70001670 0009 8725 7236. D46/015610-M 29200.01 aM2/04 58 r FBF-.*.-*-- ��� NW O!L V' {���1 60NOYLTINO 7r•�7r • IYNWI� • �� ivro . •s s•." ■•aw•w v: ATTACHMENT 6 59 r,93 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2043-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA dUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF CONFORMITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65402, FOR A POTENTIAL ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR THE WIDENING OF JEFFERSON STREET. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FINDING APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QU1NTA WHEREAS, said Section 65402 requires the jurisdiction's planning agency's (i.e., Planning Commission) review and report upon whether the proposed acquisition of real property for public purposes is consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS,.the Planning Commission of the City of La Quints, California did on the 12th day of August, 2003, hold a pubic meeting to consider a finding of conformity with the General Plan for said potential Project Site, more particularly described as, APN: 649-071-WO THROUGH 021 AND 029; 649-090-001 THROUGH 009; AND 649-141-001 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did. make the following findings of conformity with respect to the proposed project: The proposed acquisition Is in. conformance with the Le Quinta General Plan, as follows: 1. LAND USE ELEMENT: The recently adopted General Plan Land Use Element anates the properties as Low Density Residential (LDR), up to four dwelling per acre. The Element indicates the need to maintain compatible high ty land uses. The widening of Jefferson Street will not alter the surrounding use designations, and is consistent with the Element. 'ULATION ELEMENT: This Element designates Jefferson Street as a Major rial Road with a 120 foot width right-of-way. This project will allow the :t to be expanded to comply with this Element. V SPACE ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 4. PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENT: No key planning issues or. policies are identified. ATTACHMENT 7 60 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Jefferson Street Widening - General Plan Conformity Arxft Adopted: August 12. 2003 , Page 2 5. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES: This Element provides several policies and programs designed to protect and preserve the unique and/or valuable resources, including biologic resources. The properties at issue are disturbed. To the extent applicable,. this project will be subject to. the requirements of the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard Fee Mitigation Program and other applicable mitigation measures. 7. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are Identified. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT: This Element indicates that the site is within an area that is susceptible to wind-blown sand, collapsible soils, potential liquefaction hazard, and seismically induced settlement. If the properties are acquired, the widening. of Jefferson Street will most all applicable engineering requirements, and the street and landscape improvements will reduce the potential for biowsand in the vicinity of the subject property. 9, CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 10. HOUSING ELEMENT: As a. result of widening Jefferson Street the project requires acquisition of residential and vacant lots. Acquisition of the residential properties will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, and will not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, because the acquisition involves a relatively small number of properties and the current housing conditions reveal that there is more than adequate existing housing in La Quints to accommodate the displaced households. Likewise, state mandated relocation benefits will be paid to applicable displaced persons in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance & Real Properties Act of 1970, as amended, and owners of the residential property will be compensated fair market value for their property, determined on the basis of the highest and best use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quints, California, as follows: 1. That the recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case; and C:10ocuments and Setdngs%tdeerin9%Locai SettingWomporary Internet Files\OLK54%reso jeffemon st.doc �• 61 J9J Planning Commission Resok,tion 2003.059 .lefferson Strom widening • Gowal Plan Conformity Finding Adopted: August 12. 2003 Page 3 2. That it does hereby adopt this finding of conformity for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, and as shown on the Map attached hereto as Exhibit W. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 12th day of August, 2003, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners Abets, Daniels, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Quill ABSTAIN:. None TOM KIRK, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California C:1Docurnonts and Settings%tdoering%Local Settings%Tamporary Internet Files10LK541reso Jefferson st.doc 62 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: AGENDA CATEGORY: August 17, 2004 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Declaring the Public Interest and Necessity of Acquisition of Property Located at Northwest Corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California (APN 604-493-014 and 604-493-015), for Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project No. 2000-19 RECOMMENDATION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 3- Conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of a portion of the property located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, APN 604-493- 014 and 604-493-015. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The appraised fair market value of the portion of the property proposed for acquisition is $12,664.00. Additional costs will be incurred in legal fees, appraisal fees, and court costs relating to the initiation of ' eminent domain proceedings if the Resolution is approved and the matter proceeds to court. The proposed Jefferson Street Phase II. improvements are funded in accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta, the City of Indio, the County of Riverside, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG"), as amended. The overall project costs for the Phase II improvements are estimated at $16,700,000. CVAG has agreed to pay 75% of these costs. The remaining 25% will be paid by the jurisdiction in which the improvements are constructed. The City of La Quinta's funding contribution (25% of the project costs within its jurisdiction) is estimated at $2,797,250. Of this amount, the City has been provided a credit in the amount of $963,000 from State Transportation Improvement Program funding obtained by the City to offset the costs of the newly included bridge across the Whitewater River. The City has also been provided a credit in the amount of $1,647,184 as repayment for the regional share advanced by the City for the Washington Street Improvements. The City shall be responsible to repay any balance of its portion of the proposed improvements minus its credit in the amount of $2,610,184. Considering the City's estimated costs are $2,797,250, the City's out-of-pocket share will be approximately $186,466. However, the City's actual contribution will be calculated based upon the project's final costs. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Subject to the City Council's approval, staff recommends adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to authorize acquisition of a portion of the property located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street, within the city limits of the City of La Quinta. The property is to be utilized for the widening of Jefferson Street, Project No. 2000-19. This property was appraised by Michael A. Scarcella, MAI, of Capital Realty Analysts. Mr. Scarcella reviewed the applicable market data, identified and analyzed relevant comparable sales, and issued his opinion that, as of the date of value (June 1, 2004), the fair market value of the property was $12,664.00. A legal description and map of the portion of the property referenced in the proposed acquisition are attached to the Resolution as Exhibits A and B. Staff obtained title information reflecting the vesting of the property from Chicago Title Company, and an offer to purchase a portion of the property for the full amount of the appraised value was sent to the record owners on June 10, 2004. The offer letter transmitted all comparable sales upon which the appraiser based his opinion of value and the relevant parts of his appraisal report. A copy of the offer letter, excluding attachments, is provided as Attachment 1. Staff, the City's right-of-way consultant (Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc.), and the City Attorney have communicated with the owners in an attempt to review any information the owners may have regarding value, and to work towards the goal of reaching an agreement on the transfer of the property by way of a negotiated acquisition. As of the date of this report, no such agreement has been reached. As such, staff is now recommending the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution of Necessity, authorizing acquisition of the property by exercise of eminent domain. Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.220, the City may not commence an eminent domain proceeding until the City Council has adopted a "Resolution of Necessity." As a part of the Resolution, the City Council must find and declare each of the following: 2 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. 2. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that would be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. 3. The property described in the Resolution is necessary for the proposed project. 4. An offer meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record. The owners of the property are entitled to be heard on this subject, and on the issue of whether the City has followed all other procedures and is otherwise authorized to acquire the property by exercise of eminent domain. Notice to the property owners of this Resolution of Necessity hearing, and the subjects to be considered and proposed to be determined, was sent to the record owners on July 26, 2004. A copy of this notice is provided as Attachment 2. As of this date, the City has received no response from the property owners relating to this hearing. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Proposed Project The acquisition of the property is proposed for the Jefferson Street Improvement Project, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard. The project will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane, arterial highway, with a typical 120' cross-section. A diagram showing the extent of the project is submitted herewith as Attachment 3. Staff believes that the public interest and necessity require the Jefferson Street Improvement project. A traffic analysis was conducted by Mr. Robert Ross, P.E., of RBF Consulting, a copy of which is included as Appendix 8.1 of the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, which is being transmitted to the City Council under separate cover. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California, and is expected to increase to over 312,000 by the year 2010. The project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and to accommodate safe traffic movements. Staff concurs with Mr. Ross' assessment. The Proposed Project Is Planned or Located In The Manner That Will Be Most Compatible With The Greatest Public Good And The Least Private Injury The improvements will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane arterial highway, providing much needed additional traffic handling capacity over the Jefferson Street arterial to accommodate both present and future traffic demands. The widening of Jefferson Street is designed to relieve regional traffic congestion and improve the capacity of the street, which will require continuity in the roadway alignment and traffic handling capacity of the street. The project also improves an important linkage to Highway 111 and the 1-10 for existing and proposed 3 J99 residential, commercial and resort uses in La Quinta and Indio. The project will also widen and construct a multiple span, all weather bridge over the Whitewater River that will provide greater vehicular safety, including enhanced safety during flood events. In addition, the bridge will provide additional opportunities for wildlife movement and habitat access. The project will result in the least private injury because the right-of-way being acquired is limited to properties immediately adjacent to the existing roadway. These facts support the finding that the project is designed in a manner compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. The Property Described In the Resolution Is Necessary For The Proposed Project The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that it is consistent with the City's General Plan, and specifically the City's Circulation Element. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley's population is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California and expected to increase. This project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and accommodate safe traffic movements, and must of necessity utilize property adjacent to the existing right of way. Other Requirements The project has been reviewed and approved under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Originally, the project was reviewed. in the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SCN 99031046 ("1999 IS/MND"), which was certified by the City Council on May 18, 1999, in City Council Resolution No. 99-66. On August 19, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum updated the information about the project and found that the project will cause no effects on the environment that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance based on the mitigation measures adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum further supports that the project modifications that have occurred since 1999 would not result in significant environmental impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construction of the proposed roadway improvements. On August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk, in compliance with Section 21 152 of the Public Resources Code. In considering the Resolution of Necessity, the City Council should consider the environmental information contained in the Addendum, along with information in the 1999 IS/MND. Both documents have been distributed to the City Council under separate cover. In addition, on August 12, 2003, the Planning Commission considered whether the 4 potential acquisition of the properties along Jefferson Street was consistent with the City's General Plan, in accordance with Government Code Section 65402. The Planning Commission concluded that the acquisitions of the properties would be in conformity with the General Plan, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 2003- 059 reflecting such findings. A copy of that Resolution is provided as Attachment 4. Lastly, on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. The Relocation Plan has been transmitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development as required by law. Therefore, all of the legal prerequisites to the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity have been satisfied. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of property located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, APN 604- 493-014 and 604-493-15, for the purpose of improving Jefferson Street; or 2. Conduct a public hearing and do not adopt of a Resolution of the City Council declaring the public interest and necessity of the acquisition of property located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street, La Quinta, APN 604-493-104 and 604-493-15, for the purpose of improving Jefferson Street; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, lothyy R. J asso P.E. Public Works Direct /City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Offer letter + 2. Notice of Resolution of Necessity Hearing dated July 26, 2004 3. Project Diagram 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2003-059 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY OF ACQUISITION OF A PORTION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILES AVENUE AND JEFFERSON STREET, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA (APN 604-493-014 AND 604- 493-015) FOR JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, PROJECT NO. 2000-19 WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta has been the investigating potential acquisition of a portion of property located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street, in the City of La Quinta, bearing Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 604-493-014 and 604-493-015, and more specifically described in the legal description and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" which are incorporated herein by reference ("Property"); and WHEREAS, the City has been investigating the potential acquisition of a portion of this Property for the widening of Jefferson Street, specifically the Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase Il, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project No. 2000-19 ("Project"); and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004, after no less than 15 days written notice to the record owners of the Property, as shown on the title information obtained by the City, and the last equalized assessment roll, the City Council of the City of La Quinta held a public hearing for the purpose of considering, and allowing the record owners of the Property a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on, all of the following matters: A. Whether the public interest and necessity require the Project; B. Whether the Project is planned or located in a manner that is most compatible with the greatest public good and the Feast private injury; C. Whether the Property proposed to be acquired is necessary for the Project; D. Whether the offer required by Government Code § 7267.2 has been made; and 119/015610-0008 ., 529093.01 a08/13/04 6 4 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 2 E. Whether the City has properly exercised all of its statutory responsibilities and duties antecedent to the legal exercise of eminent domain against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received various factual information bearing upon each of the matters referenced above, including but not limited to, the representations made within, and evidence attached to, the staff report prepared by staff for consideration in connection with the hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, as a result of such hearing, has determined that the public health, safety, and welfare require that the City acquire a portion of the Property for the purposes of the widening of Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, the Project was originally reviewed and approved under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in the 1999 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SCN 99031046 ("1999 IS/MND"), which was certified by the City Council on May 18, 1999, in City Council Resolution No. 99-66; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum updated the information about the project and found that the project will cause no effects on the environment that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance based on the mitigation measures adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. The Addendum further supports that the project modifications that have occurred since 1999 would not result in significant environmental impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construction of the proposed roadway improvements; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk, in compliance with Section 21 152 of the Public Resources Code; and WHEREAS, in considering the Resolution of Necessity, the City Council has considered the environmental information contained in the Addendum, along with information in the 1999 IS/MND; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2003, the Planning Commission considered whether the potential acquisition of the properties along Jefferson Street was consistent with the City's General Plan, in accordance with Government Code Section 65402. The Planning Commission concluded that the acquisitions of the 119/015610-0008 529093.01 a08/13/04 7 �3 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 3 properties would be in conformity with the General Plan, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 2003-059 reflecting such findings. WHEREAS, on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. The Relocation Plan has been transmitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development. WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta is authorized to acquire the Property for street improvement purposes under the authority of its own charter, and under the authority granted by Government Code Sections 37350.5 and 40404. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. The recitals set forth correct are true and correct and are adopted as the findings of the City Council. 2. The Project for which the acquisition of the Property is required is the Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard Project, Project No. 2000-19. The project will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes generally to a six -lane, arterial highway, with a typical 120' cross- section. 3. The Property to be acquired is located within the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue and Jefferson Street in the City of La Quinta, bearing Assessor Parcel Nos. 604-493-014 and 604-493-015. The Property the City seeks to acquire consists of the following: a. A perpetual exclusive easement for public right-of-way and roadway purposes, including all use of the Property for purposes incident to public right-of-way use, including but not limited to the construction, maintenance, and operation of a roadway, underground and above ground utilities and appurtenances, cable communication or telecommunication facilities, directional, street identification, or motorist or pedestrian informational signage, traffic control devices, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, drainage and sewage facilities, and transportation facilities such as bus bays, benches, bus or train stops, bicycle pathways ,or facilities for railway or other public transportation vehicles or manners of conveyance of approximately 5,086 square feet of land, more specifically described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B". 119/015610-0008 529093.01 a08/13/04 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 4 Excepting and reserving all oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances and minerals of every kind and character lying more than 500 feet below the surface of said land, together with right to drill into, through, and to use and occupy all parts of said land lying more than 500 feet below the surface thereof for any and all purposes incidental to the exploration for and production of oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances or minerals from said other lands or, but without, however, any right to use either the surface of said land or any portion of said land within 500 feet of the surface for any purpose or whatsoever, as reserved in deeds of record. 4. The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that it is consistent with the City's General Plan, and specifically the City's Circulation Element. The City Council hereby adopts the finding set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 2003-059. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study, the Valley's population is one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California and expected to increase. This project is necessary to accommodate the projected growth and population increase and accommodate safe traffic movements. 5. The Project is located in a manner most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury, in that the improvements will include the widening of Jefferson Street from two lanes to a six -lane arterial highway providing much needed additional traffic handling capacity over the Jefferson Street arterial to accommodate both present and future traffic demands. The proposed Project will also widen and construct a multiple span, all-weather bridge over the Whitewater River that will provide greater 'vehicular safety, including during flood events, and providing additional opportunities for wildlife movement and habitat access. The proposed Project will result in the least private injury in that the design of the roadway widening must of necessity occupy land which is immediately adjacent to the existing roadway, in order to maintain the continuity of the alignment of the road for all users. The Property to be taken for the project is necessitated and established by the street alignment in an effort to minimize any disproportionate burden or impact of the required property being taken from individual property owners. The Project is designed in a manner compatible with the greatest public good in that the Project will involve road widening so as to improve an important link between Highway 1 1 1 and 1-10. 6. The Property to be acquired is necessary for the Project, in that the Project is designed to relieve regional traffic congestion and improve the capacity of the street which will require continuity in the roadway alignment and traffic handling capacity of the streets, and the Project of necessity must occur on property adjacent to the existing roadway. 119/015610-0008 9 529093.01 a08/13/04 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 5 7. The offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record, by way of a letter dated June 10, 2004. City staff has attempted to negotiate with the record owners and their representatives subsequent to the issuance of this offer, but the negotiations have not proved successful in securing the necessary property interests. 8. Notice of the resolution of necessity hearing was provided to the owners of record by way of mailed, written notice sent on July 26, 2004. 9. To the extent any of the Property to be taken herein is devoted to a public use, the City finds that the proposed use for the Property is compatible with, or more necessary to, such public use, and that the City is authorized to acquire the Property pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.510 and 1240.610. 10. The City Council hereby declares its intent to acquire the Property in the City's name in accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 11. The Project has been reviewed and approved under CEQA through the 1999 IS/MND and the Addendum thereto. The City finds that as reflected in the Addendum, that there have been no subsequent changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is to be undertaken, no new information of substantial importance regarding significant effects or mitigation measures or alternatives which has become available, and no subsequent changes have been proposed in the Project which would require further environmental review. 12. The law firm of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, City Attorney for the City of La Quinta ("City Attorney"), is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and prosecute in the name of the City such proceedings in a court having proper jurisdiction thereof, as may be necessary for the acquisition of the Property described herein, including without limitation, seeking prejudgment possession of such Property, and to prepare and file such pleadings, documents, and otherwise prosecute such actions as may be necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to acquire the Property for the City. Such attorneys are specifically authorized to take whatever steps and/or procedures as are available to them under the Eminent Domain Law of the State of California, relating to acquisition of the Property. 119/015610-0008 529093.01 a08/13/04 10 City Council Resolution 2004- Jefferson Street Widening Project Phase II Resolution of Necessity Adopted: August 17, 2004 Page 6 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DONALD 0. ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 119/015610-0008 529093.01 a08/13/04 i �� CON�tILTt#I�i '• 74� 1#6M�rar 111 Orrf. Ca �0 .Mwr'y 12.'104 Loom DEECItf 'TION t'arr 1 d 1 .Il��SON $now tifft'r CW WAY iIMM 604��'1� 01S) ?hrtoarlrnproridWommedlnftMoRs QAft Cow*aFML, a WN at■t of Cdbn* boinp %tt pa dLota'p' and dTl�ot No► at1W,2 ao,oho an a mW Samdfad !a took ao1� � 4! aZ d � b thr d tha Go�rdt► Il000idr darid C1oui�pr d mwndit vw4w 1oNowbp daaobad: �f ata WN& hors f o o'J MI, Wart 1n bat font than 111, r I he dtfirtarl■mao�rss ihewnar'Naw1"Ji• Ert4lA.aotaar'b tfiraour�wlyt�nsds■Id Lot OP. t whO Norb4403MO Emd32.401arttoa bopwAdvlwland 74r0O dthatoart In e+awi aarlrir d Jsf�son SMrrt ahowin oa arld Twat Na �41,Z as hwft a brin0mW dk moa d'NoM GW2'0" VVW Sall hrl; ft= MM rid prala'60 NOM 00" WW Wirt 211.75 Baal; n 9Nodh 04' %6• East 11.70 twat; tfi� Norw OOi'WW tort atd`1a teat b thr osMo* bo d artd CONTAMMIO: I'm 9*u Dirt l Mf W a bdW and bVM -lk Mlos mub a prt l A M CT7�0 ai Grirrni. I Ma. A tfat,Wit► and Errnww d ftam 7w is- sor0 �onwra Irisd by no or wdw ay L co my OF ra wow tawA6 a�aR rw EXHIBIT A CAMAL RULTY ANALYSTS R/AL WTAn Amumr • ANALVM e Aovam 12 48 aft INDICATES R.O.W. FOR 26 1 JEFFERSON STREET S, 006 S. F . L r �C_LFiYzY��I�1i E>• �if : Y4 IV-"NFM P�ANr 10 AOA LU& OC�film JV.FER" STREET (AM W-403-014. "4-4W-015) 1 I I 30 I ' I I 31 1 j N tN 1 39 1 a I 1 ch r-------�I v ` 1 i 0 Z0 1 1 I I • m L------ 1 35 1 I 1 I urr 'r I /C I 1,0. --�� 74" 1 I cu LOT Ow 1 I Z LOT.op �(14g;31 -36"E 416.10- PER M.S. 306/40—M) f SHEET I OF 1 SHEET • wow. • �•.rwr•wr PF.ar..+• • r�a+re�r •r w�i�� • OQM�YLTII� m nm . wa N� a wmdEPan JWAWr 12. JS W=XP-2 EXHIBIT B (10) CA!! AL JUALTr AJMALYffff Rm 9RAls AmmA� • A1w.Yse'ss • Ao NM Qa4 ;., V„* P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLS TAMPIco Of LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 June 10, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Quality Management 42335 Washington Street Unit F-427 Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 777-7000 (TDD) (760) 777-1227 Re: Offer to Acquire a Portion of Property known as Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 604-493 -014 and 604-493 -015 Gentlemen: The City of La Quinta (the "City") is proposing the construction of a widening and improvement of Jefferson Street, within the City. The City understands you are the vested owner of the above -referenced property. The City seeks to acquire the fee simple interest of approximately 5,086 square feet of the property as more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Attachment "A", which is made part of this offer by reference (the "Property"). This letter contains an offer by the City to acquire the Property, and the terms and conditions on which it proposes to do so. No final determination has been made at this point by the City as to the ownership of the Property. The City is in the process of securing information from a title company which will assist in determining exactly who the current owners are, and what other persons or entities may have lease, financing, or other interests in the property. Any acceptance of this offer is contingent upon your presentation to the City of conclusive evidence that all parties with interests in the Property (including, but not limited to, lessees, licensees, lienholders, etc.) have accepted this offer, and agreed on how the proceeds for the acquisition of the Property shall be distributed. The City had the Property appraised to determine its fair market value. The appraisal was conducted by Mr. Michael Scarcella, MAI, of Capital Realty Analysts, in accordance with commonly accepted appraisal standards, and included consideration of the highest and best use of the land. Mr. Scarcella previously corresponded with you, offering to meet with you on his inspection of the Property, and inviting you to provide information regarding the Property. Based on the appraisal, the City offers to purchase that portion of the Property (free and clear of 119/015610-0008 513962.01 aW10/04 ATTACHMENT 1 14 Quality Management June 10, 2004 Page 2 any encumbrances to title such as liens, leases, licenses, or other interests which, in the City's discretion, are unacceptable) for TWELVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR DOLLARS ($12,664.00) (the "Purchase Price"). The basis for this offer is explained more thoroughly in Attachment B of this letter. Attachment "B" is a copy of the appraisal report prepared by Mr. Scarcella, containing the data and pertinent discussion relative to the fair market value of the Property. It is made a part of this offer by reference. This offer is for conveyance to the City of a fee interest in the Property, excluding any oil, gas, or mineral rights below the depth of 500 feet, and subject to terms and conditions set out below. Payment will be made when the title to the Property vests in the City free and clear of all recorded or unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments, leases and taxes, except: 1. Taxes for the year in which the Property is purchased, which shall be cleared and paid, in the manner required by Section 5086 of the Revenue of Taxation Code, if unpaid at the time escrow closes; 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations of record, that do not interfere with the City's proposed use of the Property, as determined by the City; 3. Easements of rights -of -way over the land for public or quasi -public utility or public street purposes, if any; and 4. Any other interests in the Property or exceptions to title appearing on a preliminary title report or litigation guarantee, which are accepted by the City in writing through escrow. It shall be your responsibility to convey clear title, and to pay any fees or charges by lenders or other parties in obtaining reconveyances or other items necessary to convey clear title. As a condition of this offer; the City reserves all rights and remedies it may have against you, and all prior owners, to seek damages or other remedies in connection with any remediation or other obligation the City incurs as a result of any contamination, as may be permitted or authorized by any law, including but not limited to CERCLA (42 U.S.C. Sub -Section 9601 et seq.), the Hazardous Waste Control Law, California Health & Safety Code (Section 25100, et seq.) the Porter Cologne Act (California Water Code Section 13000 et seq.) California Health & Safety Code Sections 25280 et seq. and 33459 et seq., and the provisions of Proposition 65. The City will pay all escrow and recording fees incurred in the purchase of the Property, and if title insurance is obtained, the premium charge for such title insurance. Please let us know as soon as possible if the City's offer is acceptable. This offer shall expire if it is not accepted on or before thirty (30) days from the date it has been mailed to you. If this offer is acceptable to you, please so indicate to the undersigned, in writing. Upon receipt of your written acceptance, a Purchase and Sale Agreement incorporating the terms of this offer, and containing further escrow instructions regarding review and elimination of exceptions to 119/0156104M 15 513962.01.06/10104 411 j 1 1 Quality Management June 10, 2004 Page 3 title, will be forwarded to you for signature. Upon receipt of a signed Purchase and Sale Agreement, the matter will be reviewed by City Council, which has final approval authority. If the deal is approved by the City Council, escrow will be opened immediately. The City generally uses First American Title Company to handle escrows, and proposes this company handle any escrow here. The City is, of course, willing to consider other escrow companies, if you so desire. If for any reason you are not satisfied with this offer of just compensation, and have relevant information regarding the value of the Property that you would like the City to consider, it will be happy to do so. If you have such information, please contact me immediately and I will make arrangements to have the information reviewed and considered. If you have any questions regarding this offer, or wish to request any additional information, you may contact our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, at (760) 776-1238. Please note that the City has made no decision to exercise its power of eminent domain to acquire the Property, and can only do so after it holds a hearing at which the affected property owner(s) have had an opportunity to appear and be heard. The City much prefers to accomplish its property acquisitions by way of negotiated transactions, and toward the end of doing so with respect to this Property, would be more than willing to meet with you to discuss this offer, or any related matter. If for any reason you should see fit not to accept the City's offer, please be advised that this letter, the offer made herein, the Attachments, and all matters stated herein are made under the provisions of Evidence Code § § 1152 and 1154, and shall not be admissible in evidence in any proceeding which may be instituted relating to the acquisition of the Property, or in any other action. We hope this offer meets with your approval. As stated, our acquisition consultants, Bob Stoddard or Kathy Woolley, will be happy to meet with you to discuss the Property, the offer, or any related matter, and will attempt to contact you soon. If you need additional information, please call me at the number referenced above. Thank you. Very truly yours, TY OF LA QUINTA . Ka e e Jenson Attorne City o a Quints 119ro156104= 16 4 ti 513%2.01 a06/1O104 let P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 (760) 777-7000 78-495 Calle Tampico FAX (7 6 0) 7 7 7 - 7101 La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Quality Management 42335 Washington Street Unit F-427 Palm Desert, CA 92211 July 26, 2004 7003 1680 0000 9821 1992 Re: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 604-493-014 AND 604-493-015 Notice Of Intention To Adopt A Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located Along Jefferson Street In La Quinta, California Dear Property Owner or Tenant: This notice is sent to you under the requirements of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235. This notice concerns the City of La Quinta's plans to consider acquiring, by eminent domain, the fee simple interest of approximately 5,086 square feet of property located along Jefferson Street, in the City of La Quinta, which property consists of Riverside County Assessor Parcel Nos. 604-493-014 AND 604-493-015 (the "Property"). The City of La Quints has been investigating the acquisition of this Property for the widening of Jefferson Street, Jefferson Street Improvement, Phase II, Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard, Project 2000-19 (the "Project"). California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030 provides that a City may exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire property for a proposed public project if the following conditions are established: A. The public improvement and necessity require the project. B. The project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the great public good and the least private injury. C. The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project.' D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner of record. E. The City has complied with all other procedural requirements for utilizing the power of eminent domain to acquire the property, including review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). 119/0156104MB 527100.01a07/26/04 ATTACHMENT 2 17 miNor,61, Quality Management July 26, 2004 Page 2 This notice is sent to inform you that the City Council of the City of La Quinta will be asked to decide if the above conditions have been met, concerning the City's acquisition of the above - referenced Property. A Public hearing will be held at or about 7:00 p.m. on August 17, 2004, in the City Council Chambers located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, for this purpose. If the City Council finds that these conditions have been met, the City Council will be asked to adopt a resolution of necessity, which is a prerequisite for the City's initiation of eminent domain proceedings to acquire property. For your information and convenience, a legal description of the Property is attached to this notice. Please be advised that you are entitled to appear and be heard on any of the matters encompassed within the resolution, and specifically those matters listed above. The City asks that you provide notice that you intend to do so in writing not less than fifteen (15) days before the scheduled hearing date, but your failure to meet this fifteen -day time frame will not result in the City's refusal to consider any points you may wish to make at the hearing. You may make this written request with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253. Please take notice that if you wish to legally challenge any action taken by the adoption of the resolution of necessity, or any of the findings or matters included within it, including the City's right to use eminent domain to acquire the Property, you may be limited in court to raising only those issues raised at the resolution of necessity hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City no less than fifteen days prior to the hearing on the matter. The City must adopt a resolution of necessity before an eminent domain proceeding .can commence. Within six months after the adoption of a resolution of necessity, the City may commence eminent domain proceedings in the Riverside County Superior Court, Indio Branch. In any such proceeding, the court will be asked to determine the amount of just compensation to which you may be entitled in the event the Property is taken in eminent domain. For your information, on August 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of La Quinta adopted Resolution No. 2003-076, wherein it certified an Addendum to Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99-378 (State Clearinghouse No. 99031046) - Phase II of the Jefferson Street Improvements (segment between Highway 111 and Westward Ho Drive). On August 20, 2003, the City filed a Notice of Determination regarding the certification of the Addendum with the Riverside County Clerk in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. The Addendum found that no effects on the environment are anticipated that cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance as a result of this Project based on the previously certified Mitigation Measures adopted by the City Council on May 18, 1999, under Resolution 99-66. The Addendum further supports that the Project modifications involved will not result in significant environmental impacts. The Addendum was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15162, and concludes that no further environmental review is necessary for the acquisition and construction of the proposed roadway improvements. In considering the resolution of necessity, the La Quinta City Council will be asked to utilize this Addendum, along with the original Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99- 119/015610.0008 527100.01 s07n6104 18 Quality Management July 26, 2004 Page 3 378. The Addendum, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 99-378, and Resolution No. 2003-076 are available for inspection and copying at La Quinta City Hall, Public Works Department, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. In addition, please be advised that on November 18, 2003, the City adopted the Relocation Plan for the Jefferson Street Widening Project, Phase II, La Quinta, California, prepared by Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc. Copies of the relocation plan are available for review at the same address noted above. Please understand that neither the pendency of the City's consideration of the resolution of necessity, nor the possible initiation of formal eminent domain proceedings, in any way prevents further negotiations from occurring for the acquisition of your Property, and the City is most willing to continue such negotiations. If. you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, Kathy Jenson, at (714) 641-3413. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. V y y urs M. Ka rive Jenso City Attorney, City of La Quinta Attachment — Legal Description 119/015610-M 527100.01 &W/2"4 19 1 Subjd Prop" APN - Lpsl Description 1 � coMau�nMo 74410 "Vow 111 ft#M oaaart, a trio e OOM lour raoa 1 of � .ia�aww laws NNW CW WAY polar" WeFLma WftC�m**f er.dc� ftad., balnO !N oa'rondLot;'''andd7'h�atM� No► �t1fl,Z as.iioNn an a naip �iwad�d h �ooNt � � N Nt d t*pa b Mia �doa dMia Qar�q/ Rrcrdwd said Qounq► d --do point M111d1 Mrs ooiN So'1�"fi 4' Mh�t iaoo �t *aa 01r1 1 bm adf MW CIOraaaMwnWIUM WWW* Eaat4l@M% In *oaout..yQnadaaidlot ��Nrb44"aP'f�` l�rtiZ�Id*rtba ilsplralNwNtaiid 74vOO�tw�yd�torl■in aaaM h b, aariolt* Of j ft I M OW dl an ON Tract A p Na :kW-i m twft a bar .al'a dit= 01'Norl1 OOw" V" fail *a % ' •ianoaabrd aald praMir Narit OOr'tdw WNt Z11.75 ftft low Nor* MONIO' East ot.7O f Nor* OO WW East oft10 Mt b oJo w lft "draw Loth OONTwEtE1Oc 5,015 ogiw Riot air" and Wob whrann ne" a prt han- d I N�1`7aarl�oNlr�. and Ms d 1laoonl. TW was I V I by nr cr w dw nW dazz �oii I - w••o» 124M...�. (� CAMAL MALTY ANALYM Rw. BrrATa AMSAd • Awu.YM • Aoviam 20 0-1 bjed Properly APN �93 O- 4, 015 Ea"Ment Map INDICATES R.O.N. FOR ► Pa % .iEFFFERSON STREET S,OW S.F. i I ► E1• c-• ,�: r � � >t v Fate EXHW *B V 1p A LOW 10CMf�M NW%or—wyr (AM roe-43— 14o ia—M-013) 1 I I 30 ! I I 1f7 ' 81 I J I I 5 N W cV I I W o, I 82 ; r — — m a ` o z� i a� 4 �----- � I as 1 , i urr -r -00 3 LOT • w I 2 Lcff op (N W*31'3B'E 416.39 PER Y.B. JOs/49-M) i —N— C/2 miB.:9' A�YIlB SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET .a.w..� • wr�w � ww�Mw. PO a A"GONOWWWO JWA%W 12. '001 Jit W V0 996aI s (10� CAmrAL uALTY AxALYsri 41 a ftabum Anwar •Anum=*Avwr 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed by the law office of Rutan & Tucker, LLP in the County of Orange, State of California I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 611 Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth Floor, Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931. On July 26, 2004, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: Notice Of Intention To Adopt A -Resolution Of Necessity For Acquisition Of Certain Real Property Located Along Jefferson Street, In La Quinta, California by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below: Quality Management 42335 Washington Street Unit F-427 Palm Desert, CA 92211 In the course of my employment with Rutan & Tucker, LLP, I have, through first-hand personal observation, become readily familiar with Rutan & Tucker, LLP's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice I deposited such envelope(s) in an out -box for collection by other personnel of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, and for ultimate posting and placement with the U.S. Postal. Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. If the customary business practices of Rutan & Tucker, LLP with regard to collection and processing of correspondence and mailing were followed, and I am confident that they were, such envelope(s) were posted and placed in the United States mail at Costa Mesa, California, that same date. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. * * - Executed on July 26, 2004, at Costa Mesa, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Lauren Ramey (Type or print name) ** Served by certified mail, return -receipt requested, article number 70031680 0000 9821 1992. 96/0156104MB 17198.01 s07/26l04 22 413 FBF OONGULTINO 23 419 ATTACHMENT 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2003-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF CONFORMITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65402, FOR A POTENTIAL ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR THE WIDENING OF JEFFERSON STREET. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FINDING APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QU1NTA WHEREAS, sold Section 65402 requires the jurisdiction's planning agency's (i.e., Planning Commission) review and report upon whether the proposed acquisition of real property for public purposes is consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 12th day of August, 2003, hold a pubic meeting to consider a finding of conformity with the General Plan for said potential Project Site, more particularly described as, APN: 649-071-WO THROUGH 021 AND 020; 649-090-001 THROUGH 009; AND 649-141-001 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did. make the following findings of conformity with respect to the proposed project: The proposed acquisition is in. conformance with the La Quinta General Plan, as follows: 1. LAND USE ELEMENT: The recently adopted General Plan Land Use Element anates the properties as Low Density Residential (LDR), up to four dwelling per acre. The Element indicates the need to maintain compatible high ty land uses. The widening of Jefferson Street will not alter the surrounding use designations, and is consistent with the Element. :ULATION ELEMENT: This Element designates Jefferson Street as a Major rial Road with a 120 foot width right-of-way. This project will allow the :t to be expanded to comply with this Element. V SPACE ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 4. PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENT: No key planning issues or. policies are identified. 4r-� 24 ATTACHMENT 4 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Jefferson Street Widening - Oenersi Plan Conformity Finding Adopted: August 12, 2003 Page 2 5. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES: This Element provides several policies and programs designed to protect and preserve the unique and/or valuable resources, including biologic resources. The properties at issue are disturbed. To the extent applicable,. this project will be subject to the requirements of the Coachella valley Fringe -Toed Lizard Fee Mitigation Program and other applicable mitigation measures. 7. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are Identified. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT: This Element indicates that the site is within an area that is susceptible to wind-blown send, collapsible soils, potential liquefaction hazard, and seismically induced settlement. If the properties are acquired, the widening. of Jefferson Street will most all applicable enginering the requirements, and the street and landscape improvements will reduce potential for blowsand in the vicinity of the subject property. 9, CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT: No key planning issues or policies are identified. 10. HOUSING ELEMENT: As a result of widening Jefferson Street the project requires acquisition of residential and vacant lots. Acquisition of the residential properties will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, and will not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, because the acquisition involves a relatively small number of properties and the current housing conditions reveal that there is more than adequate existing housing in La Quinta to accommodate the displaced households. Likewise, state mandated relocation benefits will be paid to applicable displaced persons in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance & Real Properties Act of 1970, as amended, and owners of the residential property will be compensated fair market value for their property, determined on the basis of the highest an best use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Ouinte, California, as follows: 1. That the recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case; and C:\Documents and Sattingsltdeering\Local Setting$\Temporary Internet Res10LI(Wreso jefferson st.doc ) 1 25 Punning Commission Resolution 2003-059 .fefferson street Widening - pansrsl Plan Conformity Finding Adopted: August 12, 2003 Page 3 2. That it does hereby adopt this finding of conformity for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, and as shown on the Map attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 12th day of August, 200% by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Quill ABSTAIN:. None TOM KIRK, Chairman City of Le Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quints, California C:1Doauments and Settingsltdeering\Local Settings\Temporary Internet F11es10LX54\res0 jeffarson st.dac 26 4 t. 4 � O p • UF F ��fa �;I(fNl.]M1fi1� i I i� IWS COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolutions: 1) Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-508; and 2) Approving Tentative Tract Map 32279, the Subdivision of 9.71 Acres into 31 Single -Family and Other Miscellaneous Lots, Located on the North Side of Avenue 58, 2,100± Feet West of Madison Street. Applicant: Duc Housing Partners, Inc. RECOMMENDATION AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-508. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 32279, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Environmental Considerations Environmental Assessment 2004-508 was prepared for this Tentative Tract Map in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended. The Community Development Director has determined that the project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment; however, mitigation measures will reduce the impact to less than significant. Therefore, staff recommends that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact be certified for this project. S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 4 Duc TT 32279.doc General Plan Designation LDR (Low Density Residential, up to 4 dwelling units per acre). Zoning RL (Low Density Residential). Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses North: RL / PGA West South: RL / vacant East: RL / ranch dwelling West: RL / residential project under construction Background The lot is 1,323 feet deep with 330 feet of street frontage on the north side of Avenue 58. The project site is located immediately south of PGA West and east of Stone Creek Ranch (Attachment 1). The site has been improved with a single- family residence and is covered with desert shrubs. Past use of the site included, at least on the northern part of the site, agriculture. Trees exist along Avenue 58 and around the house. Project Request The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 9.71-acre site into 31 single-family residential lots (Attachment 2). Several miscellaneous lots would be created, primarily for storm water retention areas, landscaping and the private street. The proposed density of this subdivision is 3.19 dwelling units per acre which is within the maximum four dwelling units per acre range allowed in the Zoning Code and General Plan land use designation. The existing RL zoning on the property requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. All lots exceed this requirement with the smallest lot being 10,000± square feet, the largest 1 1,900± square feet, for an average of approximately 10,700 square feet. The project will have a single 32-foot to 42-foot wide curvilinear street with a card access security gate on Avenue 58. The street "bows" out at approximately the mid point of its length to provide a turnaround (traffic circle) and traffic calming. The street is shown with landscape islands used at the cul-de-sac bulb and traffic circle. A six-foot wide landscape median is shown in a portion of the private street. P\stan\tt 29053 ext #3 cc rpt.doc A At the Planning Commission meeting of July 13, 2004, discussion ensued regarding a recommended condition that the entry street design be revised. The applicant's engineer presented an alternate entry design providing the same number of lots (Attachment 3). This design relocated the entry to the east property line and provided a shared entry for the property to the east. The property owner to the east was at the meeting and conceptually agreed to the revised entry. Condition of. Approval 17 requires the entry road be revised to be a shared drive with this property to the east, or the Stone Creek Ranch to the west, with improvement costs paid for by the developer of this project. Originally, on -site storm water retention was proposed in three basins, two of which were along Avenue 58 on both sides of the street entry. The remaining smaller basin was near the middle of the project. With the revised layout, one larger retention basin is proposed adjacent to Avenue 58. Public Notice This request was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on August 7, 2004, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet around the project boundaries. To date, no correspondence has been received. Any comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Public Agency Review The request was sent out for comments, with any pertinent comments received incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meeting of July 13, 2004. The applicant presented a revised entry showing a shared drive with the property owner to the east. That property owner was present at the meeting and indicated a tentative agreement to the concept if certain provisions could be assured. The Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 2004-043 and 2004-044, recommending approval of the request, as revised by the applicant, subject to Conditions of Approval (Attachment 4). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The proposed Tentative Tract Map complies with applicable City requirements. The findings to approve this request can be made as noted in the attached Resolution. The alternatives available to the City Council include: S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 4 Duc TT 32279.doc r ��J Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2004- 508; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 322791 subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval; or 2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council approving Tentative. Tract 32279; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, car Orci, Interim Community Development Director Annroved for submission bv: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Tentative Tract Map Exhibit 3. Revised Tentative Tract layout 4. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of July 13, 2004 S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 4 Duc TT 32279.doc ! RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2004-508 PREPARED FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2004-508 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 17th day of August, 2004 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Duc Housing Partners, Inc. for Environmental Assessment 2004-508 prepared for Tentative Tract 32279, generally located on the north side of Avenue 58, approximately 2,100 feet west of Madison Street, more particularly described as follows: APN 763-240-01 1 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2004-508 for this Tentative Tract Map in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. The Community Development Director has determined that the project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment; however, the mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to less than significant level. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact is recommended to be certified; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 13T" day of July, 2004, hold a public hearing to consider this request, and adopted Resolution 2004-043, recommending certification of this Environmental Assessment; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed applications will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2004-508. PAReports CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\ea 04-508 tt 32279 cc res.doc ) ry 4 42 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2004-508 Duc Housing Partners, Inc Adopted: 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The City Council has considered Environmental Assessment 2004-508 and said reflects the independent judgment of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 0 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\ea 04-508 tt 32279 cc res.doc City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2004-508 Duc Housing Partners, Inc Adopted: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2004-508 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Mitigation Monitoring Program, attached and on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2004-508 reflects the independent judgment of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 171h day of August, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: -NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLFH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\ea 04-508 tt 32279 cc res.doc .,. C 41 City Council Resolution 2004- Environmental Assessment 2004-508 Adopted: 1. Project title: 2. 3. 4. Environmental Checklist Form Lead agency name and address: Tentative Tract Map 32279 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Contact person and phone number: Stan Sawa 760-777-7125 Proj ect location: North side of Avenue 58, approximately 2,100 feet west of Madison Street. APN: 772-270-016 5. Project sponsor's name and address: Duc. Housing Partners, Inc. 14107 Winchester Blvd., Suite H Los Gatos, CA 95032 6. General plan designation: Low Density 7. Zoning: Low Density Residential Residential 8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Subdivision proposed to allow 31 single family lots on 9.71 acres, with a central, gated cul de sac street and three retention basin areas. The lot is long and narrow (approximately 330 feet wide by 1,324 feet in length), and a single row of lots is proposed on each side of the center cul de sac street. Lot sizes are proposed to range from approximately 10,000 to 11,900 s.f. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: North: Single family residential, golf course, (Low Density Agriculture) South: Avenue 58, vacant, (Low Density Residential and Golf Course Open Space) West: Single family residential (Low Density Residential) East: Vacant (Low Density Residential) 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coachella Valley Water District PAstan\ttms\tt 32279 ea 2004-508 ea doc.doc ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities / Service Systems Agriculture Resources Cultural Resources Hydrology / Water Quality Noise Recreation Air Quality Geology /Soils Land Use / Planning Population / Housing Transportation/Traffic Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the X environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 45�r� Signature June 18, 2004 Date 9 4 r ;J EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead. agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. �0 4 �4W 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a proj ect's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, X including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Aerial photograph) c) Substantially degrade the existing X visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial X light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) I. a)-d) Avenue 58 is designated an Agrarian Image Corridor according to the General Plan. This corridor is required to include landscaped parkways which reflect the agriculture which historically occurred in this area. The project will be required to comply with these requirements The site does not include, nor is it near, a scenic resource. The proposed project will result in single family homes on lots of approximately 10,000+ feet in size. The City regulates height in residential zones, so that the maximum potential height for the homes would be two stories. Given the size of the proposed lots, the homes will not create a significant impact to views in the area. The ultimate construction of single family homes on the site will result in a slight increase in light generation, primarily from car headlights and landscape lighting. The City regulates lighting levels and does not allow lighting to spill over onto adjacent property. Impacts will not be significant. J1 4 3 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique X Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for X agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (General Plan Land Use Map) H. a)-c) The proposed project site is vacant desert land. There are no Williamson Act contracts on the property. Agricultural lands occur further east and south, but not adjacent to the project site. The site is located in an area of the City which is urbanizing, and represents a logical extension of development in the City. Impacts to agricultural resources are expected to be insignificant. I2 4� Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct X implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any air quality standard or X contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable X net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2002 PM 10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to X substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) III. a), b) & c) The Tentative Tract Map proposes 31 single family lots, which could generate up to 297 trips per day'. Based on this traffic generation, and an average trip length of 10 miles, the following emissions can be expected to be generated from the project site. "Trip Generation, Oh Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, Single Family Detached category 210. Moving Exhaust Emission Projections at Project Buildout (hounds per dav) Ave. Trip Total Total No. Vehicle Trips/Day Length (miles) miles/day 297 x 10 = 2,970 PM10 PM10 PM10 Pollutant ROC CO NOX Exhaust Tire Wear Brake Wear Grams at 50 mph 267.30 6,949.80 1,425.60 - 29.70 29.70 Pounds at 50 mph 0.59 15.34 3.15 - 0.07 0.07 SCAQMD Threshold (lbs./day) 75 550 100 150 Assumes 297 ADT. Based on California Air Resources Board's EMFAC7G Emissions Model. Assumes Year 2005 summertime running conditions at 75°F, light duty autos, catalytic. As demonstrated above, the proposed project will not exceed any of SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds. The project's potential impacts to air quality from moving emissions are therefore expected to be less than significant. The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (Particulates of 10 microns or less). The Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan adopted much stricter measures for the control of dust both during the construction process and during project operations. These include the following, to be included in conditions of approval for the proposed project: CONTROL MEASURE TITLE & CONTROL METHOD BCM-1 Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities: Watering, chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control BCM-2 Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access restriction, revegetation BCM-3 Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical stabilization, access restriction, revegetation BCM-4 Paged Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road shoulders, clean streets maintenance The proposed project will generate dust during construction. Under mass grading conditions, this could result in the generation of 256.3 pounds per day, for a limited period while grading operations are active. The contractor will be required to submit a PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 1 4 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Imported fill shall be adequately watered prior to transport, covered during transport, and watered prior to unloading on the project site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior. to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on- going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Any area which remains undeveloped for a period of more than 30 days shall be stabilized using either chemical stabilizers or a desert wildflower mix hydroseed on the affected portion of the site. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Landscape parkways on Avenue 58, and the project's perimeter wall, shall be installed immediately following precise grading. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction - related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour Implementation of these mitigation measures will ensure that impacts associated with PM10 are mitigated to a less than significant level. III. d) & e) The project will consist of single family homes and will not result in objectionable odors, nor will it expose residents to concentrations of pollutants. 'I 4 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would theproject: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, X either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on X any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on X federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the X movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or X ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) f) Conflict with the provisions of an X adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (General Plan Exhibit 6.3) IV. a)-f) The proposed project site is currently partially developed, with one single family house, and has therefore been considerably disturbed. The subject property is not located in a recommended survey area for sensitive species identified in the General Plan. Lands to the north and west are already developed, and lands to the east have been disturbed. Lands to the south are isolated from this property by Avenue 58. The property is therefore isolated habitat, and is not expected to contain sensitive species. There is no known riparian or wetland habitat on the subject property. The proposed project site is located outside the mitigation fee area for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard. 17 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of a historical resource as defined in'15064.5? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey..." CRM Tech, May 2004) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5 ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey..." CRM Tech, May 2004) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ("Paleontological Resources Assessment," CRM Tech, May 2004) d) Disturb any human remains, including X those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey..." CRM Tech, May 2004) V. a)-c), e) A Phase I archaeological survey was conducted on the subject property. The survey included both records searches and on site investigation. The records searches identified a number of studies and associated records of both cultural and historic resources in the area of the project site. The on site investigation was completely negative. The house on the subject property is not historic. The report concludes that no further analysis or investigation of the subject property is required, but that should resources be uncovered during earth moving activities, work should be diverted or stopped until a qualified archaeologist can properly analyze the find. The Historic Preservation Commission at its meeting of June 17, 2004 required the following mitigation measures be implemented to mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level: 1. The site shall be monitored during on- and off -site trenching and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit. 2. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the project. 2 "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report Assessor's Parcel No. 762-240-011," prepared by CRM Tech, May 2004. �. 8 3. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. 4. That the Native American Heritage Commission, Torres -Martinez Band of Indians, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, and Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians be consulted for a search of their files to determine the presence of Native American cultural resources. Implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. v. d) A paleontologic assessment was conducted for the project site 3. The study found that the project site is within the historic lakebed of ancient Lake Cahuilla. The study further found that disturbance of the site could result in a significant impact to paleontological resources. In order to assure that these impacts are mitigated to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1.. On- and off -site monitoring of earth -moving and grading in areas identified as likely to contain paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Proof that a monitor has been retained shall be given to City prior to issuance of first earth -moving permit, or before any clearing of the site is begun. 2. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. 3. A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens shall be submitted to the City prior to the first occupancy of a residence being granted by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions of the significance of all recovered resources where appropriate. The report and inventory, when submitted will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. 3 "Paleontological Resources Survey Report Assessor's Parcel No. 762-240-011," prepared by CRM Tech, May 2004. 44 4. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City. Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall comply with standards commonly used in the paleontological industry. Implementation of these mitigation measure will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. 20 4 11 0 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, X as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (MEA X Exhibit 6.2) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, X including liquefaction? (MEA Exhibit 6.3) iv) Landslides? (MEA Exhibit 6.4) X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or . X the loss of topsoil? (MEA Exhibit 6.5) d) Be located on expansive soil, as X defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property (MEA Exhibit 6.1) e) Have soils incapable of adequately X supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (MEA Exhibit 8.1) VI. a)-e) The proposed project site is not located in. an Alquist Priolo Study zone, but will experience significant groundshaking in the event of an earthquake in the Coachella Valley. The site is in an area of potential liquefaction. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site specific geologic analysis, including liquefaction, as part of the building permit process, to assure that any potential hazard is remedied through construction techniques. The soils on the site are not expansive, and that the site will not be subject to landslides. The project site will be connected to sanitary sewer service, and 4 el 3 soils will not be impacted by septic tanks. Impacts associated with soils and geology are expected to be less than significant. The project site is located in an area of blow sand potential. The mitigation measures included above under air quality are designed to mitigate the potential impacts associated with blow sand at the project site to a less than significant level. 22 444 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application materials) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle X hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application materials) d) Be located on a site which is included X on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or X physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff) h) Expose people or structures to a X significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) vII. a)-h) Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment reports were prepared for the subject property4. The Phase II study was required to determine the nature of four areas of stained soil on the property. The property had many years ago been in agriculture, and the presence of organochlorine pesticides was suspected. The Phase H determined that although trace amounts of pesticides were present in the soil, they were likely remaining from many years ago, and no further study was warranted. The site is otherwise clear of hazardous materials. The development of single family homes will not result in a risk associated with hazardous materials. The City implements, through its solid. waste provider, a household hazardous waste program, which will allow residents to dispose of materials safely. The site is not in an area subject to wildland fires. 4 "Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Assessor's Parcel Number 762-240-011," and letter report "Phase II Samplings and Analysis" dated April and May, 2004, respectively, prepared by Earth Systems Southwest. J Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER UALITY -- Would theproject: a) Violate any water quality standards or X waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater X supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff. c) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off --site? ("Retention Basin Design Calculations, Tract No. 32279," P&D Consultants, Inc., April 2004) d) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? ("Retention Basin Design Calculations, Tract No. 32279," P&D Consultants, Inc., April 2004) e) Create or contribute runoff water X which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? ("Retention Basin Design Calculations, Tract No. 32279," P&D Consultants, Inc., April 2004) f) Place housing within a 100-year flood X hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard X area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) VIII. a) & b) Domestic water is supplied to the project site by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The eventual development of the site will result in the need for domestic water service for single family homes. The CVWD has prepared a Water Management Plan which indicates that it has sufficient water sources to accommodate growth in its service area. The CVWD has implemented or is implementing water conservation, purchase and replenishment measures which will result in a surplus of water in the long term. The project proponent will also be required to implement the City's water efficient landscaping and construction provisions, which will ensure that the least amount of water is utilized within the homes. The applicant will also be required to comply with the City's NPDES standards, requiring that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters. These City standards will assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than significant. VIII. c) & d) The City requires that all projects retain the 100 year storm on site. A preliminary analysis of the retention requirements for the site was prepared to address this requirements. The analysis found the need for three basins, which will receive water through the central cul de sac. The City Engineer will review and approve the analysis for the site, prior to the issuance of any permits. These City requirements are expected to lower potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. e)-g) The site is. not located in a flood zone as designated by FEMA. 5 "Retention Basin Design Calculations, Tract No. 32279," prepared by P&D Consultants, Inc., April 2004.. 26 4 c7 J Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established X community? (Aerial photo) b) Conflict with any applicable land use X plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 74 ff.) IX. a) & c) The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use category in which it is located, and the lots are designed to be similar in size to approved maps located in this area. The site is currently generally vacant, with only one residential structure, and development on the site will have no impact on an existing community. The site is not within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan fee area. b) The General Plan requires a minimum 250 feet between driveways along Avenue 58. As designed, the project will be 112± feet from the driveway to the east, and 110± feet from the driveway to the west. In order to assure that these impacts are mitigated to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1. Direct vehicular access to Avenue 58 from lots with frontage along Avenue 58 is restricted, except for the access point conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. The applicant is hereby conditioned to make a good faith effort to establish a joint access to his/her development either with the easterly or westerly abutting property owner. If such attempt(s) with the abutting property owner are unsuccessful, the applicant is conditioned to locate the access point at the easterly property line and provide access to the access drive for future development of the 07 4 4 9 easterly property. The final access point shall be approved by the Public Works Department. Implementation of these/ this mitigation measure will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a X known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a X locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) X. a) & b) The proposed project site is within the MRZ-1 Zone, and is therefore not considered to have potential for mineral resources. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation X of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation X of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) c) A substantial permanent increase in X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the prof ect? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) d) A substantial temporary or periodic X increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) XI. a)-f) The proposed project will include the construction of single family homes, which are considered sensitive receptors to noise. The area in which the project is located, however, is not an area of the City where General Plan buildout noise levels are expected to be elevated. Furthermore, the proposed project includes the construction of a 6 foot high perimeter wall, which will lower noise levels within the project. In addition, the two �g retention basins proposed for the southern portion of the site will cause the first housing units on the site to be further set back from Avenue 58. Impacts associated with exterior noise sources are expected to be less than significant. The construction of homes on the site will also generate noise. The site is located adjacent to residential land uses, which may experience temporary and short term increases in noise levels during site construction. However, since the proposed project has been conditioned to construct its perimeter wall prior to the initiation of construction, and the adjacent projects also have existing perimeter walls, it is expected that these impacts will be less than significant. The site is not located in the vicinity of an air strip or airport. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth X in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of X existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) . c) Displace substantial numbers of X people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) XII. a)-c) The proposed project is currently vacant desert lands, with one residential unit, and construction of the project will not displace an existing community. The development of 31 single family homes is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations on the project site, and will not generate a substantial population growth in the area. Impacts are expected to be negligible. 31. ��3 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.) X Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks X Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, X p. 46 ff.) XIII. a)Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate sales and property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services, as well as the costs of general government. The project will be required to pay the mandated school fees and park in lieu fees in place at the time of issuance of building permits. 32 1. V Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of X existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application materials) b) Does the project include recreational X facilities or require the construction or ' expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application materials) XIV. a) & b) The construction of 31 residential units within the project will be supported by the payment of the City's parkland fee, to mitigate any additional impact to City parks. 33 A Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is X substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan UP, p. I1I-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or X cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic X patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a X design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Tentative Tract Map 32279) e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? (Tentative Tract Map 32279) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X (Tentative Tract Map 32279) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, X or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project description) XV. a)-g) The construction of 31 homes will not have a significant impact on the City's circulation system. The density proposed for the site is consistent with the General Plan designation for the property, and was therefore analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Avenue 58 is 34 expected to operate at acceptable levels of service at buildout of the General Plan. The 297 trips expected to be generated by this site daily will not significantly impact the circulation system. The project proponent will be required to provide on -site parking for the homes in the form of garages. The design of the tract does not include any roadway hazards. The site is within the service area of SunLine Transit, and may eventually be provided bus service as development occurs. 35 4� Potentially Less Than Less Than No Signif cant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment X requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of X new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of X new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Have sufficient water supplies X available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) e) Result in a determination by the X wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the proj ect's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the proj ect's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) g) Comply with federal, state, and local X statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) 36 :: 3 XVI. a)-g) Utilities are available at the project site. The service providers for water, sewer, electricity and other utilities have facilities in the immediate vicinity of the site, and will collect connection and usage fees to balance for the cost of providing services. The CVWD has indicated its ability to serve the proj ect's water and sewer needs. The construction of the proposed project is expected to have less than significant impacts on utility providers. 37 4 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to X degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to X achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental X effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. a) The site has been identified as having the potential for paleontological resources. However, mitigation measures proposed above will reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. XVII. b) The proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing opportunities for City residents. XVII. c) The construction of 31 residential units will not have considerable cumulative impacts and is consistent with the General Plan. 38 4 G 0 XVII. d) The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect human beings, due to air quality impacts. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non -attainment area for PM10, and the site will generate PM10. Section III), above, includes a number of mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts on air quality. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Not applicable. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. Not applicable. 39 4 c� City Council Resolution 2004- Environmental Assessment 2004-508 Adopted: CITY OF LA QUINTA MONITORING PROGRAM FOR CEOA COMPLIANCE DATE: June21, 2004 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 772-270-016 CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map 32279 PROJECT LOCATION: North side of Avenue 58, about 2,100 feet west of Madison Street. EA/EIR NO: 2004-508 APPROVAL DATE: In Process APPLICANT: Duc Housing Partners, Inc. THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTS THE CITY'S MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ABOVE CASE NUMBER SUMMARY MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY DATE III. AIR QUALITY Maintain construction equipment. Contractor Project Construction SCAQMD standards Utilize temporary power. City Engineer Prior to issuance of grading III) standards permits. Pre -water and stabilize soils. Building Department Prior to issuance of building Site inspection permits. Inform personnel of ridesharing and Community Development Prior to the issuance of PM 10 alternative transportation. Department grading permits Management Plan Stabilize undeveloped areas after 30 Building Department During construction. Site inspection days. Install landscaping early. Landscape Building Department During construction. Site inspection. Avenue 58 parkway and install perimeter wall with first phase. Enforce SCAQMD Rule 403 Building Department During grading. Site inspection. ttop grading during winds of more Building Department During grading. Site inspection. han 25 mph., 1 st and 2nd stage ozone e�pisodes. SUMMARY MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY DATE V. CULTURAL RESOURCES On- and off -site monitoring of earth- Public Works/Community Prior to beginning of Inspection moving and grading in areas identified Development Department grading or earth -moving as likely to contain paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Proof that a monitor has been retained shall be given to City prior to issuance of first earth -moving permit, or before any clearing of the site is begun. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens shall be submitted to the City prior to the first occupancy of a residence being granted by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions of the significance of all recovered resources where appropriate. The report and (7} CJ !-" inventory, when submitted will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City. Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall comply with standards commonly used in the paleontological industry. The site shall be monitored during on - and off -site trenching and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the project. Collected archaelogical resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene. self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. That the Native American Heritage Commission, Torres -Martinez Band of Indians, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, and Augustine Band of iU ndians be consulted for a their files to determine the f Native American cultural Fresources. SUMMARY MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY DATE IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING Direct vehicular access to Avenue 58 Public Works Department Prior to approval of final map During plan check from lots with frontage along Avenue 58 is restricted, except for the access point conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. The applicant is hereby conditioned to make a good faith effort to establish a joint access to his/her development either with the easterly or westerly abutting property owner. If such attempt(s) with the abutting property owner are unsuccessful, the applicant is conditioned to locate the access point at the easterly property line and provide access to the access drive for future development of the easterly property. The final access point shall be approved by the Public Works Department. The applicant shall pay for all off -site entry drive improvements needed to comply with this condition upon recordation of easement with adjacent property owner for joint access. RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF 9.71 ACRES INTO 31 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17t' day of August, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Duc Housing Partners, Inc. for the subdivision of 9.71 acres into 31 single-family residential and other miscellaneous lots, located at on the north side of Avenue 58, approximately 2,100 ± feet west of Monroe Street, more particularly described as: APN 763-240-01 1 WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63) in that the La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2004-508 for this Tentative Tract Map in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. The Community Development Director has determined that the project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment; however, the mitigation measures imposed for this project will reduce the level to less than significant. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact has been certified for this project; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 13T" day of July, 2004, hold a public hearing to consider this request, and adopted Resolution 2004-044, recommending approval subject to conditions; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings of Approval to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map 32279: 1. The Tentative Tract Map improvements and design are consistent with the General Plan in terms of density, street design and infrastructure requirements. 44 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc res.doc 4 City Council Resolution 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32279 Duc Housing Partners, Inc. Adopted: 2. The design of the subdivision and its proposed improvements are not likely to create environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat because no impacts have been identified in Environmental Assessment. 3. The design of the subdivision and subsequent improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because urban infrastructure improvements will be installed based on applicable local, State, and Federal requirements. 4. The design of the revised subdivision and the proposed types of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the subdivision in that none presently exist and access is provided within the project and to adjacent public streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 32279 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 171h day of August, 2004, 'by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc res.doc `t 7 0 1 City Council Resolution 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32279 Duc Housing Partners, Inc. Adopted: ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California we P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc res.doc 4�� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: [;FNFRAI 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 4'7 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa:doc �Ln CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). The applicant or his/her designer can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. 48 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc i1 t J CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: F. The approved SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 7. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 8. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Avenue 58 Provide 48-foot right-of-way on Avenue 58 along Tentative Tract Map boundary except for an additional variable right of way dedication at the proposed primary entry measured 56 feet north of the centerline of Avenue 58 and length to be determined by a traffic study prepared for the applicant by a licensed traffic engineer per Engineering Bulletin # 03-08. As a minimum, the required right of way shall be for a length of 100 feet plus a variable dedication of an additional 50 feet to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 9.. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 49 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc _ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 10. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb similar to the lay out and typical street section shown on the tentative map. Private Residential Streets without Median. Measured at gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall be 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. The CC&R's shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department prior to recordation. Private Residential Streets with Medians. Layout and street section as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. As a minimum, travel widths shall be at least 16 feet on one side of the median and 20 feet on the opposite side. B. CUL DE SACS 1) The cul de sac shall conform to the shape shown on the tentative map with a 38-foot curb radius at the bulb or larger as shown on the tentative map. 11. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 12. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1 " equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all r �0 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc r� ) 1 �• CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement 13. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 15. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of-ways as follows: A. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 17. Direct vehicular access to Avenue 58 from lots with frontage along Avenue 58 is restricted, except for the access point conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. The applicant is hereby conditioned to make a good faith effort to establish a joint access to his/her development either with the easterly or westerly 51 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc Ll 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: abutting property owner and record an easement with that adjacent property owner for joint access. If such attempt(s) with the abutting property owner are unsuccessful, the applicant is conditioned to locate the access point at the easterly property line and provide access to the access drive for future development of the easterly property. The final access point shall be approved by the Public Works Department. The applicant shall pay for all entry drive improvements needed to comply with this condition. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 18. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recordin.g of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAPS 19. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster -image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 20. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. Jr, P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc �} t CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 21. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. 0 13 C. Off -Site Street Plan: Vertical 1 if = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. On -Site Street Plan: 1 if = 4' Vertical On -Site Rough Grading Plan On -Site Precise Grading Plan: ill = 40' Horizontal, 1 it = 40' Horizontal 1 If = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. The On -Site Precise Grading plans are required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc 53 J CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: "Street Parking" plan shall include appropriate signage to implement the "No Parking" concept, or alternatively an on -street parking policy shall be included in the CC & R's subject to City Engineer's Approval. The parking plan or CC & R's shall be submitted concurrently with the Street Improvement Plans. 22. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction on the Public Works Online Engineering Library at: http://www.la-guinta.org/publicworks/tractl/z onlinelibrary/0 intropage.htm. 23. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 24. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 25. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 26. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the 54 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 27. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 28. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 29. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. i 30. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC, and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC. All .grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in. accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. 55 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc 47 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 31. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or 32. stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 33. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six (6) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 34. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations' shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 35. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 36. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 56 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc -� n CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 37. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 38. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 39. The applicant shall revise proposed retention basins to comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 40. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 41. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field or equivalent system approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 42. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 43. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin 97.03, and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be 57 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc f7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: planted with maintenance free ground cover. For retention basins on individual lots, retention depth shall not exceed two feet. 44. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls on to the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 45. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 46. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 47. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 49. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 50. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 51. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc Ll 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 52. with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 53. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 54. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 58 Widen the north side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Subdivision boundary as specified in the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The north curb face shall be located thirty six feet (36') north of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) deceleration/right turn only lane at the Primary Entry. The north curb face shall be located forty eight feet (44') north of the centerline, and length to be determined by a traffic study prepared for the applicant by a licensed traffic engineer per Engineering Bulletin #03-08. As a minimum the required length shall be 100 feet plus available dedication of an additional 50 feet. Other required improvements in the Avenue 58 right .of way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: 59 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc 481 —r— CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: a) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, plus a single overhead street light at the street connection to Avenue 58. b) An 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that touches the back of curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5 feet of the perimeter wall at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. B. PRIVATE STREETS Private Residential Streets without Median. Measured at gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall be 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. The CC&R's shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department prior to recordation. Private Residential Streets with Medians. Layout and street section as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. As a minimum, travel widths shall be at least 16 feet on one side of the median and 20 feet on the opposite side. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Shall be constructed according to the lay -out shown on the tentative map with 38-foot curb radius or greater at the bulb similar to the layout shown on the rough grading plan. 6© PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc Q 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 55. All gated entries shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non - accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn -around out onto the main street from the gated entry. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 56. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential Secondary Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 57. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 58. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Primary Entry (Avenue 58): Full turn movements are permitted. 61 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc 483 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 59. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic . control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 60. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. CONSTRUCTION 61. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 62. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 63. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. Plans shall be approved by the Community Development Department. 64. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 65. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. 62 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc ei 8 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 66. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. QUALITY ASSURANCE 67. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 68. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 69. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 70. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As - Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 71. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 72. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. 63 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc 4 .3_5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: FEES AND DEPOSITS 73. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 74. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 75. Prior to final map approval by the City Council, the developer shall meet the Parkland Dedication requirements by payment of in -lieu fees as set forth in Section 13.48 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 76. Within 24 hours of approval of the tentative tract map by the City Council, the developer shall submit to the Community Development Department, a check made out to the "County of Riverside" for $1,314 to allow filing of a Notice of Determination for Environmental Assessment 2004-508 as required by State law. FIRE MARSHAL 77. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a 2-hour duration at 20 PSI. 78. Blue dot retro-reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 79. Any turn or turn -around requires a minimum 38-foot outside turning radius. 80. All structures shall be accessible from an approved roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of the first floor. 64 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc • 4:J0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 81. The minimum dimension for access/egress roads and gates is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches in height. Parking is permitted on one side for roads that are 28 feet, and on both sides for roads that are 36 feet or more clear and unobstructed. Parking is not permitted on roadways less than 28 feet in width and must be posted and red -curbed. Islands are considered an obstruction. 82. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and signs. 83. Any gate providing access from a public roadway to a private entry roadway shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one- way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 38- foot turning radius shall be used. 84. Gates shall be automatic, minimum 20 feet in width and shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. 85. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. Two sets of water plans are to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. MISCELLANEOUS 86. Final perimeter wall designs including height, color, material, design shall approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of grading permit or building permit for the wall, whichever occurs first. Perimeter wall height along east property line shall provide a minimum six feet of exposed height as measured from east side of wall. E5 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc 48 ►y CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32279 DUC HOUSING PARTNERS, INC. ADOPTED: 87. Proposed street name with a minimum of two alternative names per street shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval. Names to be approved prior to recordation of final map. 88. All mitigation measures contained in Environmental Assessment 2004-508 shall be met. 89. Prior to final map approval, the developer shall submit to the Community Development Department for review, a copy of 'the proposed Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC and R's) for the project. 90. This tentative tract map shall expire two years after City Council approval, unless recorded or granted a time extension pursuant to the requirements of Division 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 91. - Minor lot configuration modifications required to comply with these conditions and Fire Marshal requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and Public Works Department. 92. Approval of production home designs, perimeter wall and landscaping requires approval of a Site Development permit application by the Planning Commission. 66 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32279 Duc\tt 32279 cc coa.doc ATTACHMENT 1 S 0 c� pf legends Wo ��• Saint Andrews ...PROJECT J\� SITE Hermitage 9 +; Shinnecock E o cn Hts. N 1- Avenue 58 -CASE MAP CASE No. rr 32279 EA 2004-508 NORTH SCALE: NTS 67 ■ f q�aoa rtR . I 2 �T N 4 am *& N� rtR qair 89R N 7.� N 8 N ��R f0 N woa �R q��ff 0449 BOIL . fz q xwso& N14Mf ,.R 14 N am..R q fs imam4A 81 14W4R. ..�ri IAM *R nw 27 %M atR x am *R �z 24 a22 R 20 nwon f9 *WWI f8 am � gars a'A°" AVENUE 58 IATTACHMENT 3 N 12sc�1+l v�rv�c�c� -APPR91fE�BY PLANNING COMMISSION ON -7(13109- BY 5, � U�, DATE -71 (!flr,>4-_ RESO # O4 — 044 CASE N0. TT B..�L-2..'7q I PljeoscA +Y.-Acb (.A ou 68 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 15. Chairman Kirk stated a option before the Commission is a yes or no vote and he doe ave some concern about removing a name of someone who s made a contribution to the City. He would suggest staff loo into a better process for determining a street name change a d bring this back to the Commission. He would prefer to see o tions. This may be the best place for honoring this person, but ere may be better ways that could be explored for the future r quests to give the Commission and Council options. He expres ed concern about removing the name of someone who has cont r uted to the development of the City and believes there should a options available to the Commission so it is not just a yes or o choice. 16. It as moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Quill to a opt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-042, recommending pproval of Street Name Change 2004-017, as recommended: RO issioners Daniels, Krieger, Ladner, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Environmental Assessment 2004-508 and Tentative Tract Map 32279; a request of Duc Housing Partners, Inc. for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and consideration of the subdivision of 9.71 acres into 31 single-family and other miscellaneous lots for the property located on the north side of Avenue 58, 2,100 ± feet west of Madison Street. 1. Commissioners Daniels and Krieger noted a potential conflict of interest due to the location of their residences and left the dias. 2. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Quill asked if the distance of 1320 was sufficient for the cul-de-sac. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated yes. Commissioner Quill asked about a modification to the stacking at the entry as to whether an alternative configuration should be considered. Staff noted no, but there was a change in the location of the driveway. Commissioner Quill asked if there had been any study on the access should it have to be moved to 69, G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 401 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 the east. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated the driveways on both sides of the property are nonconforming. There is no way to have this access comply with the General Plan without having a shared access. If the applicant cannot obtain the access rights from the adjacent property owner, the General Plan does allow the City Engineer to create the safest possible mechanism to construct the access. 4. Chairman Kirk stated that with the change in the driveway to the east or sharing the access to the west it will drastically change the tract map and therefore, he is not sure what they are approving. The whole orientation of the project may change drastically. Staff noted they should be able to come up with the same number of lots. The main change will be the street entrance along Avenue 58. The applicant can better address the question. 5. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dan Lee, civil engineer representing the applicant, gave a presentation on a shared access that would allow them to have the same number of lots. He stated they have reviewed the conditions and have no objections. He went on to describe the project. 6. Commissioner Quill questioned the length of the cul-de-sac. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer explained why it was of sufficient size for the City and Fire Department. 7. Mr. Richard Baker, 80-600 Avenue 58, property owner to the east, stated he had just finished working with the developer to the east of his property that affected his property. He is not looking forward to another development. He believes the proposed alternative access is the best solution to the problem and he would be willing to share an entrance. He is willing to grant an easement to allow the shared entrance. He will lose the privacy of his own access as well as a large eucalyptus tree. He would request these expenses be required of this developer. 8. Commissioner Quill asked if he was willing to give the full easement if it is at the developer's expense. Mr. Baker stated that in principle yes, but he would like to see a better drawing showing the relationship to his property. He requests the wall between the properties that it be a minimum of six feet on his side, with his 7 grade. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc c Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 9. Mr. C. Cleeman, 54-420 Vallejo, consultant for the developer, stated they have taken Mr. Baker's concern into consideration and they are more than willing to accept all costs related to the entrance and agrees to the six foot height of the wall on his property line. 10. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 11. Commissioner Quill asked that the conditions be reworded to state the developer shall be required to pay for all costs associated with the easement and east entry for the full access. He further stated he would like to see a more creative design of the retention basin such as a park space or amenity to the property. 12. Commissioner Ladner stated she agrees with Commissioner Quill's comments on the retention basin. 13. Chairman Kirk complimented the developer on the design of the tract map and asked staff if there was any opportunity to change the design of the retention basin. Planning Manager Oscar Orci noted there were opportunities to change the design, but not the purpose of the retention basin. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-043, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-508, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Ladner, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Daniels and Krieger. ABSTAIN: None. 15. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Quill/Ladner, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-044, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 32279, as amended: a. Condition added: The applicant shall be responsible for constructing a six foot high wall on the property line with the east property owner for the length of the project. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc L 93 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 2004 b. Condition added; The applicant shall make every effort to acquire the easement from the eastern property owner for the construction of a shared entry and shall bear the sole expense for the shared entry. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Ladner, Quill, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Daniels and Krieger. ABSTAIN: None. Commissioners Daniels and Krieger rejoined the Commission. E. t Permit 2004-810; a request of La Quinta Golf Estates for consideration of architectural plans to remodel the existing La Quinta Golf Estates guardhouse and driveway access improvements for the roperty located on Coachella Drive between Eisenhower Drive and A enida El Nido. 1.\Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff rt. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the mation contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the munity Development Department. 2. Chair an Kirk asked if the turning radius at Coachella Drive and Eisenho er Drive was being changed. Assistant City Engineer Steve S er noted the changes that were occurring at this location. 3. Commissione\ed sked if there was a way to accommodate the concerns Mr. Wales Staff noted the problems were raised by theture and Landscape Review Committee (ALRC), but cant had not completed the landscape concept plansC therefore, requested the final details of the project beack to them for review. Therefore, staff has added a ce uiring them to go back to the ALRC. 4. Commissioner Ladner ask d if the height of the trellis was addressed. Staff noted it is tlitprimary entrance, and the height was required to be 13'6" as tipulated by the Fire Department. Commissioner Ladner asked if t e residents were supporting the proposal. Staff stated the resid is had been informed, but to staff's knowledge, no presentation ad been made to the residents regarding the details. 72 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-13-04.doc 494 � ,�QurKrw MEMORANDUM y'1 . eq:4a %J /Y) . T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: OSCAR ORCI, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, DATE: AUGUST 17, 2004 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING #4 Attached is a letter of approval from Mr. Richard Baker, the property owner to the west of the Duc Housing project, stating he approves the shared access design proposed by the developer. M E S S I N A A B A K E R August 11, 2004 Mr. Oscar Orci Planning Manager City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 Dear Oscar: 4J,NT� A � a I am writing at the suggestion of Steve Speer since I may not be able to attend the 8/ 17 City Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the proposal to me by D.U.C. housing to construct a joint entrance for my property at 80600 Avenue 58 and their proposed development. I wish to state that I am comfortable with the proposal but that we don't have a written agreement yet because of time constraints. If you have any questions, please either contact me directly or talk to my engineering representative Allan Levin who will be present at the 8/17 meeting. Sincerely, hard Baker cc: Allan Levin Robert Hargreaves, Esq. 9 5 5 C A R R I L L 0 D R I V E S U I T E 1 0 0 L 0 S A N G E. L E S C A 9 0 0 4 8 3 2 3 , 9 5 4 - 8 6 0 0 f a x 3 2 3 • 9 5 4 8 1 1 1 LOT II 1 II XW u 2 II U 3 U 144n *it it II 4 it 84W ,*& II 5 II ,a�r.4a II U 6 II AM MIA II u 7 U MM SIA II 7 i 8 II 'M MIA II 9 "'`A U 10 1a°'° SOA --I II �� -i II 12 II 13 II 14$ a¢ft II u 14 II VIM .Ie II II 15 II 11,51! WL II II 16 it RAW *R II II Il II 31 141844 30 148W »R 29 28 ltui .q. 27 a�x1 �R 26 I0a4M qA 25 lam 40L 24 1Qp7 aFR 23 KW&*R 22 1WsjA 21 MAW .aa 20 11,ON ay.Jt 19 X" SfA 18 1utM 80A 17 11,m r41 LOT C LOTB IAM0 41 AVENUE RM 0 A A. t AVENUE 58 0_ LOTB 19, 640 sq. ft. 18 10, 460 sq. ft. 17 11, 619 sq. ft. LOTC R=300' R=5' R=5' 1 .r I i 10 �' 1 R_5, 1 I 1 I 27 27 1 - - - - -- - AVENUE 58 . 1� R a • a. EXHIBIT Y PROJECT UNE DATA TAff ��-������ SITE UL•iJ✓ o p 5 9 o 3 0 U v a� v cn N ■ Avenue 58 VICINITY MAP L4J' NTS 762=240=11 76244042 lk L4 ' 4'19'43"E 93.98'— SCALE: 1 "= 50' mom■ N8Gap ■v. N �i R1 ■ ago ■ L5 EM AREA = 21,823 SOFT. o, N ■ ' r v; .� S8622'01 T 200.91, MOD MOD MODOODOWD 1 ' >A S89'40'25"W 262.09' P.O.C. AVENUE 58 PREPARED BY: P&D CONSULTANTS, INC. ' USE EASERABW 8954 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE, SUITE 610 FFRO;RrAOCESA cVVT SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108 /V7 MAEE �WNC TELE. (619)291-1475 FAX. 291-1476 AhD LAA� LINE BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N0074 54 W 30.00 L2 N0074 54 W 14. DO L3 S89'40 31 W 62.92 L4 83578'S8"E 45.16' L5 S82�721 W 48.30 L6 S00'19 35 E 5.01' easement1.txt Project: DUC HOUSING August 03, 2004 JOINT USE EASEMENT Parcel name: EASEMENT North: 5016.9668 East: 3688.1073 Line Course: N 00-14-54 W Length: 14.00 North: 5030.9667 East: 3688.0466 Line Course: S 89-40-31 W Length: 62.92 North: 5030.6101 East: 3625.1276 Line Course: N 07-02-39 E Length: 142.67 North: 6172.2032 East: 3642.6239 Line Course: S 83-28-58 E Length: 45.16 North: 5167.0776 East: 3687.4921 Line Course: N 84-19-43 E Length: 93.98 North: 6176.3648 East: 3781.0120 Line Course: S 07-02-39 E Length: 74.00 North: 5102.9234 East: 3790.0870 Line Course: S 82-67-21 W Length:.48.30 North: 5097.0001 East: 3742.1516 Line Course: S 07-02-39 E Length: 61.26 North: 6036.2025 East: 3749.6641 Line Course: S 86-22-01 E Length: 200.91 North: 5023.4716 East: 3950.1704 Line Course: S 00-19-35 E Length: 6.01 North: 6018.4617 East: 3960.1989 Line Course: S 89-40-25 W Length: 262.09 North: 6016.9687 East: 3688.1132 Perimeter: 1010.30 Area: 21,823 sq.fL 0.50 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0062 Course: N 72-11-18 E Error North: 0.00188 East: 0.00586 Precision 1: 162,951.61 Page 1 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Approving Tentative Tract Map 32068, the Subdivision of Four Acres into 12 Single -Family Lots Located on the South Side of Manarina, 200± Feet West of Pomelo Within the Citrus. Applicant: Marvin Investments RECOMMENDATION AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 32068, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Environmental Considerations The La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that the request has been assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 85-034 for Specific Plan 85-006 which was certified on October 15, 1985. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed, nor has any new information been submitted which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental review pursuant to Section 15162 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 5 TT 32068 Marvin.doc General Plan Designation LDR (Low Density Residential, up to 4 dwelling units per acre). Zoning RL (Low Density Residential). Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses North: RL / residential South: RL / Citrus Clubhouse East: RL / Citrus entry West: RL / residential In the Citrus Background The project site is located in the Citrus residential subdivision that was approved under Specific Plan 85-006 in 1985. The project site is approximately four acres in size and consists of open and paved areas and an abandoned parking lot that was used for the first temporary clubhouse and maintenance building (Attachment 1) . Upon construction of the permanent clubhouse and maintenance building and the removal of the temporary buildings, the parking lot ceased to be used. The improvements on the project site include a row of 34 parking spaces that are no longer part of the clubhouse parking area. In 1989, the majority of the project area was subdivided into two residential lots for nine condominium units with a cul-de-sac street and several common area lots. This street and units were never constructed. Project Request The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 4.02-acre site into 12 single-family residential lots (Attachment 2). Several miscellaneous lots would be created for landscaping and the private street. The interior street will be 36-feet wide and allow parking on both sides. The proposed density of this subdivision is 3.00 dwelling units per acre which is within the maximum four dwelling units per acre range allowed in the General Plan, Zoning Code and Specific Plan. The existing RL zoning on the property requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. All lots exceed this requirement with the smallest lot being 11,550 square feet, the largest 16,165 square feet, for an average of 14,332 square feet. 2 S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 5 TT 32068 Marvin.doc q 9 6 The project will have a single 36-foot wide curvilinear cul-de-sac that allows parking on both sides. On -site storm water will be drained into the existing drainage system within the Citrus. Public Notice This request was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on August 7, 2004, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet around the project boundaries. To date, no correspondence has been received. Any comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Public Agency Review The request was sent out for comments, with any pertinent comments received incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meeting of July 27, 2004. The Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 2004-059, recommending approval of the request, subject to Conditions of Approval (Attachment 3). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES The proposed Tentative Tract Map complies with applicable City requirements. The Findings necessary to approve this request can be made as noted in the attached Resolution. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 32068, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval; or 2. Do not approve a Resolution approving Tentative Tract 32068; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4ari'Orci, Interim Community Development Director S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 5 TT 32068 Marvin.doc. �J� Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Tentative Tract Map Exhibit 3. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of July 27, 2004 E S:\CityMgr\STAFF REPORTS ONLY\PH 5 TT 32068 Marvin.doc 498 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF . LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY FOUR ACRES INTO 12 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT 32068 MARVIN INVESTMENTS WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of August, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Marvin Investments for the subdivision of four acres into 12 single- family residential lots and other miscellaneous lots, located at on the south side of Mandarina, approximately 200 feet west of Pomelo, more particularly described as: APN'S 772-190-007 THROUGH -012 WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63) in that the La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that the request has been assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 85-034 for Specific Plan 85-006 which was certified on October 15, 1985. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed, or new information submitted which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental review pursuant to Section 15162 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 27T" day of July, 2004, hold a public hearing to consider this request, and adopted Resolution 2004-059, recommending approval subject to conditions; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings of Approval to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map 32068: 1. The Tentative Tract Map and its improvement and design are consistent with the General Plan in that its street design and lots are in conformance with applicable goals, policies, and development standards, such as density, and will provide adequate infrastructure and public utilities. 5 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc res.doc q-" 9 3 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Adopted: 2. The design of the subdivision and its proposed improvements are not likely to create environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat because most of the site is developed.. 3. The design of the subdivision and subsequent improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because urban infrastructure improvements are existing or will be installed based on applicable local, State, and Federal requirements. 4. The design of the revised subdivision and the proposed types of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the subdivision in that none presently exist and access is provided within the 'project and to adjacent public streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 32068 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc res.doc City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Adopted: ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc res.doc '� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2004- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32068 MARVIN INVESTMENTS ADOPTED: GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies if required: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 8 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc J 4 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: 4. The'applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). The applicant or his/her designer can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste. Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be 9 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval — Recommended Adopted: approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The approved SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 7. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 8. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Private Residential Streets measured at gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 36-foot travel width as shown on the approved tentative tract map. B. CUL DE SACS 1) The cul de sac shall conform to the shape shown on the tentative map with a 38-foot curb radius at the bulb or larger as shown on the tentative map. 9. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of- ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of 10 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc 5 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval — Recommended Adopted: the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets to include Mandarina. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. Additionally, the applicant shall not build any structures within 10 feet south of the Mandarina Street right of way. 11. Dedications shall include additional easement as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance, and other features contained in the approved construction plans and as required by the Public Works Department. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an street geometric layout, drawn at 1 " equals 40 feet, detailing the abovementioned design aspects. The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of intersection sight distance that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated perimeter wall setback requirement. 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, and common areas on the Final Map. 13. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. The applicant shall furnish proof of relinquishing the "Common Area" lot from the Home Owner's Association from the former owner as shown on recorded Tract Map No. 24890-2. 14. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, .unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. 11. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc r-- r^- City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: FINAL MAPS 15. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster - image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 16. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 17. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Street Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical B. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 if = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, "On -Site Precise Grading" plan is required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. 12 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc [� City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 18. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction on the Public Works Online Engineering Library at http://www.la-guinta.org/publicworks/tractl/z onlinelibrary/0 intropage.htm. 19. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 20. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 21. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 22. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 23. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have 13 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc - M City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval — Recommended Adopted: the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 25. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 26. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC, and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 27. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion 1.4 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 28. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 29. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 30. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 31. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved. Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 32. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. nRAINAGF 33. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Citrus Development. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and/or disposed as approved by the City Engineer. UTI LITI FS 34. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 15 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: 35. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 36. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 37. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 38. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the approved Tentative Tract Map. A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Construct full 36-foot wide travel width improvements measured gutter flow line to gutter flow line with proposed curb and gutter design. B. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Shall be constructed according to the lay -out shown on the tentative map with 38-foot curb radius or greater at the bulb similar to the -layout shown on the rough grading plan. 39. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: 16 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc J0 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval — Recommended Adopted: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 40. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. LANDSCAPING 41. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a four foot landscape planter along the existing service road located south of the tentative tract as a buffer between Lots 6 through 9 and any CMU wall to be constructed. 42. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, and retention basins shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 43. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 44. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. QUALITY ASSURANCE 45. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 17 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc 511 11 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval — Recommended Adopted: 46. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 47. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 48. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 49. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 50. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks if required. FEES AND DEPOSITS 51. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 52. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). W16 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract Map 32068 Marvin Investments Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: FIRE MARSHAL 53. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a 2-hour duration at 20 PSI. 54. Blue dot retro-reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on; to identify fire hydrant locations. 56. Any turn or turn -around requires a minimum 38-foot turning radius. 57. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. One set of water plans are to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. MISCELLANEOUS 58. Perimeter walls shall be compatible with existing walls in the area of the project site and approval by the Community Development Department. Walls shall be placed to provide adequate intersection visibility. 59. Proposed street name with a minimum of two alternative names shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval. Names shall be approved prior to recordation of final map. 60. This tentative tract map shall expire two years after City Council approval, unless recorded or granted a time extension pursuant to the requirements of Division 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 61. Minor lot configuration modifications required to comply with these conditions requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and Public Works Department. 62. Production home designs and front yard landscaping requires approval of a Site Development Permit application by the Planning Commission. 19 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\tt 32068 Marvin Investments\tt 32068 cc coa.doc W 2 lid off _4 , ilg -10- FS 119. 11 a d4ime'dolp., 110.2 am 4 11 alasgi Him lJossi MO. �AA IN a A17AC**AENT 3 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 east side of Jefferson Stree/ north of Avenue 54. 1. Chairman Kirk op ed the public hearing and asked for the .staff report. Princip Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in th report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development epartment. 2. There bein no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant ould like to address the Commission. Mr. John Gamlm, represen ng ND La Quinta Partners, gave a presentation on the project. 3. Chai an Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. Th a being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the p lic participation portion of the hearing. Zadopt was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to Planning Commission Resolution 2004-058, recommending pproval of Street Name Change2004-018, as recommended: ALL: AYES: Co missioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. ---- E. Tentative Tract Ma 32068; a request of Marvin Investments for certification of the subdivision of four acres into 12 single family lots for the property located on the south side of Mandarina, west of Pomelo, within the Citrus Country Club. 1 . Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the, Community Development Department. Staff noted amendments to several conditions being recommended by the .Public Works Department. 2. There being no questions of staff Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Comm'isslon. Mr. Wells Marvin, representing the applicant, stated he was available to answer any questions. He has no objections to the conditions as proposed. He did note the on -site storm water drainage would go to the golf course. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated that the condition could be amended to state that if there was 22 P:\Reports - PC\8-10-2004\7-27-04 minutes\7-27-04.doc 51 [ l r Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 suitable offsite location, it would be allowed. 3. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk . closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 4. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-059, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 32068, as amended: a. Condition #10: Add, "Additionally, the applicant shall not build any structures within ten feet south of the Mandarina Street right-of-way." b. Condition #41: Add, "Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 4-foot landscape planter along the existing service road located south of the tentative tract as a buffer between Lots 6-9 and any CMU wall to be constructed. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. VII. C�QRRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VIII. CON*ISSIONER ITEMS: A. D cussion regarding Commission meeting date to be cancelled. Following dis ssion, it was determined the Commission would cancel the meeting of A ust 24, 2004. IX. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adjour this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular 00 p.m. , at 7: meeting of the Planning mmission to be held on August 10, 2004Jul 2004. This meeting of the Plannin Commission was adjourned 8:06 p.m., on y , Respectfully submitted, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary, City of La Quinta, California 2 P:\Reports - PC\8-10-2004\7-27-04 minutes\7-27-04.doc COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of CONSENT CALENDAR: Resolutions to: 1) Certify a Mitigated Negative STUDY SESSION: Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-480; and 2) Approve Tentative Tract PUBLIC HEARING: 31087, a 19-Lot Subdivision on ± 5.0 Acres, on the South Side of Darby Road, ± %4 Mile East of Washington Street. Applicant: Tahiti Partners V RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-480, pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Resolution; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 31087, subject to the attached conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The site of Tentative Tract 31087 is currently vacant desert land which has been significantly disturbed by off -road activity and illegal dumping. No Williamson Act contracts occur on the property. A commercial nursery exists north of the project site. The site is not. located in an area of significant agricultural activity. Residences (Bella Vista subdivision) exist to the southeast of the site; to the southwest is vacant land designated for High Density Residential and commercial land use. Darby Road borders the north of the site; this street is not designated in the City's General Plan Circulation Element and is a public street. No prior development applications have been filed on this site. J16 The site is located just outside the City's corporate boundary, but within an established Sphere of Influence of La Quinta which has been prezoned Low Density Residential (up to 4 dwelling units per acre) land use designation. Government Code Section 66454 allows a local agency (City) to act upon tentative maps for unincorporated area adjacent to that City's boundary, provided that any approval is conditioned upon the land being annexed to the City within a specified time period, to be determined by the City. Staff has incorporated an appropriate condition, which includes a time limit that coincides with the tentative map approval time limits. Project Proposal The applicant is requesting approval of a single-family detached home subdivision with 19 lots (Attachment 2). The lots will range in area from 8,1 1 1 to 11,946 square feet, averaging about 8,900 square feet. The only street within the project is a southern extension from Darby Road, which will be brought into the site as a cul-de-sac street. It is proposed as a 50 foot right-of-way design, incorporating a 32-foot roadbed with 9-foot wide parkways. Darby Road will be improved at a 30-foot half -width, consistent with a local street design. A small detention basin (Lot A) is shown in the northeast corner of the site. Public Agency Review Staff transmitted the applicant's request to all responsible and concerned public agencies. All comments received are on file at the Community Development Department, and have been incorporated into the attached Conditions of Approval, where necessary and appropriate. Public Notice This case was advertised in Oe Desert Sun newspaper on July 27, 2004. All property owners within 500-feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required. To date, no written responses to this notice have been received. Any such correspondence received prior to the meeting will be transmitted to the City Council Historic Preservation Commission On May 20, 2004, the City's (Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) (Attachment 3) reviewed the property owner is Phase I Archaeological Survey Report, prepared by L&L Environmental, Inc. The HPC( found the investigation to be insufficient in its content, and remanded it back to L&L'', for revisions. The revised report went back to HPC on July 15, 2004, with the contents and findings of the report accepted. The survey included both records search and on -site investigations. The on -site survey did not identify any resources on the site. However, due to potential for buried resources on the site, the survey recommends that an archaeological monitor be present during 2 1 earth moving activities. The HPC concurred with the report recommendation to monitor the site, and the Planning Commission is recommending these measures as mitigation measures in the environmental documents. Planning Commission Action On July 27, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 2004-054 and 2004-055, recommending certification of the Environmental Assessment, and approval of the project, subject to findings and conditions as have been provided for in the attached City Council Resolutions. Discussion focused on the following matters: • The accuracy of the boundary and lot cross -sections as shown on the tentative map. Staff made several clarifications in response to the Commission's queries. • Addition of conditions as recommended by staff. The Public Works Department proposed additional routine corrections primarily relating to conditions for maintenance of common area requirements. After discussion, Conditions 9, 10 and 67 were revised as requested by memorandum from the Public Works Department, dated 7/26/04 (Attachment 4) . Minutes from the July 27, 2004 Planning Commission meeting are incorporated as Attachment 5. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Findings necessary to approve the applications can be made and are contained in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-480, pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Resolution; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 31087, subject to the attached conditions; or 2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council, certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and approving the Tentative Tract Map; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 5"o0 Respectfully submitted, • scar W. Orci, Interim Community Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Proposed TT 31087 3. Minutes of HPC meeting of May 20, 2004 4. Memorandum of 7/26/04 from Public Works 5. Minutes of Planning Commission meeting of 7/27/04 G! RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-480, FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31087 CASE NO. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-480 APPLICANT: TAHITI PARTNERS V WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of August, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Tahiti Partners V, for certification of Environmental Assessment 2003-480, prepared for Tentative Tract 31087, located on the south side of Darby Road, ± 1 /4 mile east of Washington Street, more particularly described as: LOT 24 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 32 OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 27th day of July, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider adoption of a recommendation on Environmental Assessment 2003-480, prepared for Tentative Tract 31087, a request to subdivide ± 5.0 acres into 19 single-family residential lots and several lettered lots; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California unanimously adopted Resolution 2004-054, recommending adoption of Environmental Assessment 2003-480; and WHEREAS, said legally described property is within an area which is part of the approved Sphere of Influence for the City of La Quinta; and, WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 66454 provides that a City may take action on a tentative subdivision map of unincorporated property adjacent to that City, provided that any approval of said map shall be conditioned upon annexation of said property to such City; and WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, City Council Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2003-480) and has determined that, although the proposed Tentative Tract 31087 could have a significant effect on the environment, however, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures incorporated into the project eJ PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\ccresoea480.doc t^ -� City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2003-480 Tahiti Partners V Adopted: August 17, 2004 approval will mitigate or reduce any potential impacts to a level of non -significance, and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the La Quinta City Council did make the following findings to justify their certificationrof said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Tentative Tract 31087 will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the project in question will not be developed, in any manner inconsistent with the General Plan and other current City standards when considering the required mitigation measures to be imposed. The project will not have the potential to substantially reduce or cause the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The site has been identified as having the potential for archaeological resources. However, mitigation measures have been incorporated which will reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. 2. There is no evidence before the city that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 3. The proposed Tentative Tract 31087 will not have the potential to achieve short term goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. The proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing opportunities for City residents. 4. The proposed Tentative Tract 31087 will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, in that development activity in the area has been previously analyzed as part of the project approval process. Cumulative project impacts have been considered and mitigation measures proposed in conjunction with approval of those projects, and development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. The construction of 19 residential units will not have considerable cumulative impacts and is consistent with the General Plan. 6 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\ccresoea480.doc `� City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2003-480 Tahiti Partners V Adopted: August 17, 2004 5. The proposed Tentative Tract 31087 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan. No significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 6. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 7. The City Council has considered Environmental Assessment 2003-480 and determined that it reflects the independent judgment of the City. 8. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 9. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That is does hereby certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-480 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, attached hereto, and on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote to wit:. AYES: NOES: PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\ccresoea480.doc J City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2003-480 Tahiti Partners V Adopted: August 17, 2004 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\ccresoea480.doc ��J Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project title: Tentative Tract Map 31087 2. Lead agency name and address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact person and phone number: Wally Nesbit 760-777-7125 4. Project location: South side of Darby Road, approximately 1,250 feet east of Washington St. 5. Project sponsor's name and address: Tahiti Partners 5305 E. Second Street, #204 Long Beach, CA 90803 6. General plan designation: Low Density 7. Zoning: Low Density Residential' Residential' 8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Subdivision of a 4.8 acre parcel into 19 residential lots, a retention basin lot and an interior cul-de-sac. Lots will be 8,100 square feet or larger. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: North: Darby Road, Vacant desert rands, commercial plant nursery (Low Density Residential) South: Vacant desert lands (High Density Residential) West: Vacant desert lands (High Density Residential) East: Vacant desert lands (Low Density Residential) 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coachella Valley Water District Property is designated Low Density Residential on the City's General Plan and Zoning.maps. However, the property is currently outside the City limits, in the City's Sphere of Influence. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc f ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities / Service Agriculture Resources Air Quality Cultural Resources Geology /Soils Hydrology / Water Land Use / Planning Quality Noise Population / Housing Recreation Transportation/Traffic Mandatory Findings of Significance Systems DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the X environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 14tj lv-June 11, 2004 Signature Date PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc ' J ` � EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, 'Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the proj ect. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 11. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a proj ect's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, X including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Aerial photograph) c) Substantially degrade the existing X visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial X light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) I. a)-d) Darby Road is not designated an Image Corridor in the General Plan. There are no significant land forms on or near the property. The property is some distance from either the Santa Rosa or the San Bernardino mountains. The development of the site will result in the construction of 19 single family homes. The City allows single and two story construction in the Low Density designation, which limits the potential height of structures. No impacts to scenic resources are expected. The ultimate construction of single family homes on the site will result in a slight increase in light generation, primarily from car headlights and landscape lighting. The City regulates lighting levels and does not allow lighting to spill over onto adjacent property. Impacts will not be significant. 12 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique X Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (General Plan Land Use Map) . II. a)-c) The proposed project site is currently vacant desert land which has been significantly impacted by off -road vehicle use and dumping. No Williamson Act contracts occur on the property. A commercial nursery occurs north of the project site. The site is not located in an area of significant agricultural activity. The development of the site, given the separation from the nursery by Darby Road, will not impact the on -going ability of the nursery to operate. Impacts associated with agricultural resources are expected to be less than significant. 13 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 5v0 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct X implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any air quality standard or X contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable X net increase_ of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2002 PM10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to X substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) III. a), b) & c) The primary source of air pollution in the City is the automobile. The Tentative Tract Map will ultimately result in the construction of 19 single family homes, which could generate up to 182 trips per day. Based on this traffic generation, and an average trip length of 10 miles, the following emissions can be expected to be generated from the project site. 2 "Trip Generation, 6t' Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, Single Family Detached category 210. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 14 JJI Moving Exhaust Emission Projections at Project Buildout (pounds per day) Ave. Trip Total Total No. Vehicle Trips/Day Length (miles) miles/day 182 x 10 = 19820 PM10 PM10 PM10 Pollutant ROC CO NO Exhaust Tire Wear Brake Wear Pounds at 45 mph 0.40 8.961.61 - 0.04 0.04 SCAQMD Threshold (lbs./day) 75 550 100 150 Based on California Air Resources Board's EMFAC7G Emissions Model. Assumes Year 2005 summertime running conditions at 75°F, light duty autos, catalytic. Based on the emissions shown in the Table, the proposed project will not exceed any of SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds. The project's potential impacts to air quality are therefore expected to be less than significant. The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM 10 (Particulates of 10 microns or less). The Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan adopted much stricter measures for the control of dust both during the construction process and during project operations. These include the following, to be included in conditions of approval for the proposed project: CONTROL MEASURE TITLE & CONTROL METHOD BCM-1 Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities: Watering, chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control BCM-2 Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access restriction, revegetation BCM-3 Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical stabilization, access restriction, revegetation BCM-4 Paved Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road shoulders, clean streets maintenance The proposed project will generate dust during construction. Under mass grading conditions, this could result in the generation of 125.93 pounds per day, for a limited period while grading operations are active. The contractor will be required to submit a PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 15 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Imported fill shall be adequately watered prior to transport, covered during transport, and watered prior to unloading on the project site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on- going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Any area which remains undeveloped for a period of more than 30 days shall be stabilized using either chemical stabilizers or a desert wildflower mix hydroseed on the affected portion of the site. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Landscape parkways on Darby Road shall be installed with the first phase of development on the site, as shall the proj ect's perimeter wall. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction - related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. Implementation of these mitigation measures will ensure that impacts associated with PM10 are mitigated to a less than significant level. III. d) & e) The project will consist of single family homes and will not result in objectionable odors, nor will it expose residents to concentrations of pollutants. 16 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would theproject: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, X either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ("Tahiti Partners Property... Biological Resources Assessment," April 2004) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on X any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ("Tahiti Partners Property... Biological Resources Assessment," April 2004) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on X federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ("Tahiti Partners Property ...Biological Resources Assessment," April 2004) d) Interfere substantially with the X movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident -or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ("Tahiti Partners Property... Biological Resources Assessment," April 2004) 17 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc r-- -� e) Conflict with any local policies or X ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ("Tahiti Partners Property... Biological Resources Assessment," April 2004) f) Conflict with the provisions of an X adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ("Tahiti Partners Property... Biological Resources Assessment," April 2004) IV. a)-f) A biological resource survey was conducted for the proposed project3. The survey found that the property was typical of the most'common habitat found in the Coachella Valley, the Sonoran Desert scrub. The survey included focused surveys for Coachella Valley Milk Vetch and for Desert Tortoise. Neither species were found. The study's scope included detailed site surveying, which would have detected burrows or other sign for Burrowing Owl, and no such sign was found. The survey concludes that the species included in the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation are not present on the site, and that potential impacts to biological resources are less than significant. The proposed project site is located within the mitigation fee area for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard. The applicant/developer shall pay the required mitigation fees for the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard, as in effect at the time of issuance of any grading or other land disturbance permit. 3 "Tahiti Partners Property... Biological Resources Assessment," prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental, April '2004. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of a historical resource as defined in'15064.5? ("A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report...," L&L Environmental, December 2003) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to'15064.5? ("A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report...," L&L Environmental, December 2003) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (MEA Exhibit 5.9) d) Disturb any human remains, including X those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report...," L&L Environmental, December 2003) V. a)-d) A Phase I archaeological survey was conducted on the subject property4. The survey included both records searches and on -site investigations. The records searches identified a number of previous finds within one mile of the project site. The on -site survey did not identify any resources on the site. However, because of the potential for buried resources on the site, the survey recommends that an archaeological monitor be present during earth moving activities, to assure that potential impacts are reduced to a less than significant level, as follows. 1. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit. The final report on the Development Department Occupancy for the project. monitoring shall be submitted to the Community prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of 4 "A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report on the Bermuda Dunes Property..." prepared by L&L Environmental, December 2003 19 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahitAEA Checklist.doc J%_�.� 2. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. The proposed project site is outside the historic lake bed of Lake Cahuilla, and no paleontologic resources are expected to occur on the site. �O PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, X as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract 31087," Sladden Engineering, October 2003) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, X including liquefaction? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract 31087," Sladden Engineering, October 2003) iv) Landslides? ("Geotechnical Investigation X Tentative Tract 31087," Sladden Engineering, October 2003) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or X the loss of topsoil? (MEA Exhibit 6.5) d) Be located on expansive soil, as X defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract 31087," Sladden Engineering, October 2003) e) Have soils incapable of adequately X supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract 31087," Sladden Engineering, October 2003) r21. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahitAEA Checklist.doc VI. a)-e) A geotechnical survey was conducted for the proposed project sites. The survey found that the project site lies in a Zone IV groundshaking zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. Structures on the site will be required to meet the City's and the State's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The site was found to not.be susceptible to liquefaction, due to a depth to groundwater of more than 130 feet. The site soils were found to be non -expansive. The site is relatively flat and will not be subject to landslides. Construction of homes on the project site, within the standards and requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the City Engineer, will reduce potential impacts associated with seismic events to a less than significant level. The project site is located in an area of very severe blow sand potential. The mitigation measures included above under air quality are designed to mitigate the potential impacts associated with blow sand at the project site to a less than significant level. 5 "Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract 31087," prepared by Sladden Engineering, October 2003. 22 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc - v Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would theproject: a) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application materials) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle X hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application materials) d) Be located on a site which is included X on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or X physically interfere with an adopted 3 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 5110 10 emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff) h) Expose people or structures to a X significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VII. a)-h) The construction of single family homes on the proposed project site will not result in significant impacts associated with hazardous materials. The City implements the standards of the Household Hazardous Waste programs through its waste provider. These regulations and standards ensure that impacts to surrounding areas, or within the project itself, are less than significant. The site is not in an area subject to wildland fires. 24 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 54 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VIM HYDROLOGY AND WATER UALITY -- Would theproject: a) Violate any water quality standards or X waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater X supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff. c) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water X which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) n PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 5440 f) Place housing within a 100-year flood X hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard X area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) VIII. a) & b) Domestic water is supplied to the project site by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The eventual development of the site will result in the need for domestic water service for residential units, commercial uses and landscaping. The CVWD has prepared a Water Management Plan which indicates that it has sufficient water sources to accommodate growth in its service area. The CVWD has implemented or is implementing water conservation, purchase and replenishment measures which will result in a surplus of water in the long term. The project proponent will also be required to implement the City's water efficient landscaping and construction provisions, which will ensure that the least amount of water is utilized within the homes. The applicant will also be required to comply with the City's NPDES standards, requiring that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters. These City standards will assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than significant. VIII. c) & d) The City requires that all projects retain the 100 year storm on site. The proposed tract map includes the provision of a retention basin adjacent to Darby Road, which will also be required to accommodate the 100 year storm. The City Engineer will review and approve the drainage analysis for the site, prior to the issuance of any permits. These City requirements are expected to lower potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. e)-g) The site is not located in a flood zone as designated by FEMA. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc a Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established X community? (Aerial photo) b) Conflict with any applicable land use X plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 74 ff.) IX. a)-c) The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations placed on the property by the City in pre -zoning the property. The land is currently vacant, and development of the homes on the site will not displace an existing community. The site is within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan fee area, and will be required to pay fees at the time construction occurs. 27 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc �� 4 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a X known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a X locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) X. a) & b) The proposed project site is within the MRZ-1 Zone, and is therefore not considered to have potential for mineral resources. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Cheddist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation X of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation X of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) c) A substantial permanent increase in X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) d) A substantial temporary or periodic X increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) XI. a)-f) The proposed project site is located in a relatively isolated area which is not subject to significant noise levels. Development of the site and adjacent lands will increase noise levels, but even at buildout, noise levels should be within the City's standards of 65 dBA 29 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 5 ^ Ar CNEL. Impacts associated with noise at the subject property are expected to be less than significant. The construction of the proposed project will generate noise from construction equipment and activities. There are no sensitive receptors adjacent to the project site, however, who might be impacted by construction noise. Impacts associated with construction noise are therefore expected to be less than significant. The site is not located in the vicinity of an air strip or airport. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth X in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of X existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of X people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) XII. a)-c) The development of the single family home project will be consistent with General Plan and Zoning standards and will add to the options available to those seeking housing in the community. Lands within and adjacent to the project are currently vacant, so no displacement will occur. The development of 19 housing units will not induce substantial growth in the City. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist:doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.) X Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks X Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, X p. 46 ff.) XIII. a)Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate sales and property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services, as well as the costs of general government. The project will be required to pay the mandated school fees and park in lieu fees in place at the time of issuance of building permits. 31 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc _ J Q Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of X existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application materials) b) Does the project include recreational X facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application materials) XIV. a) & b) The construction of 19 residential units within the project will be supported by the payment of the City's parkland fee, to mitigate any additional impact to City parks. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Cheddist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is X substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or X cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic X patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a X design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Tentative Tract Map 31087) e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? (Tentative Tract Map 31087) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X (Tentative Tract Map 31087) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, X or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project description) XV. a)-g) The development of 19 homes has the potential to generate 182 daily trips on City roadways. The proposed project will take access from Darby Road, a local road without General Plan designation. The land use contemplated by the proposed project is 3 3 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahitAEA Cheeldist.doc �� consistent with the land uses analyzed in the General Plan traffic study, which found that this area of the City would experience acceptable levels of service at General Plan buildout. The potential impacts associated with the traffic generated by the proposed project are expected to be less than significant. The design of the site will not result in unsafe circulation. The Fire Department has commented on the proposed project and did not find a problem with access to the site. The site is located close to Washington Street, which will provide access to public transit. 34 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahitAEA Checklist.doc J :,i Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment X requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of X new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of X new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Have sufficient water supplies X available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) e) Result in a determination by the X wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project=s projected demand in addition to the provider=s existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) g) Comply with federal, state, and local X statutes and regulations related to solid 35 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc JJ� waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) XVI. a)-g) Utilities are available at the project site. The service providers for water, sewer, electricity and other utilities have facilities in the immediate vicinity of the site, and will collect connection and usage fees to balance for the cost of providing services. The construction of the proposed project is expected to have less than significant impacts on utility providers. 36 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 5 �- 3 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to X degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to X achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental X effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. a) The site has been identified as having the potential for cultural resources. However, mitigation measures proposed above will reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. XVII. b) The proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing opportunities for City residents. XVII. c) The construction of 19 residential units is less than could potentially occur on this site, will not have considerable cumulative impacts and is consistent with the General Plan. 37 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 5!54 XVII. d) The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect human beings, due to air quality impacts. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non -attainment area for PM10, and the site will generate PM10, Section III), above, includes a number of mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts on air quality. Noise impacts have been mitigated above to less than significant levels. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Not applicable. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. Not applicable. 33 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\EA Checklist.doc 5 J V 0 tn .- 4 >, 0 A 0 �d 0 I � C0 U N � U O Z ram+ C O �p 0..4 � U W O ..o A �WV�O wV� oa 00 0 M ca N � rn O O 000 o � o H � H a A U p�q �A a� Ox UU 0 0 0 1.0 cd v� cod ,., a b0 L� O O U cd U Cd � ,�" G w W O G 'd Cd cd o CA Cd a w� Cd �o w b Cd b b b b U U m UA m m Z cad C en O cd O " O OCIS �+ U O W Cd codc; cn4-4Q, c c o 0.0 .b o A. c�v o 4-4 a � Q" 'd c U b p. cd �.. 4 � b)cd 33 F A U p�q �A a� �WV OU o U U A a a� �o F Cd ap A E an b Z on O an v� •� •� p4 U O F c Cd 40 RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31087, SUBDIVIDING ± 5.0 ACRES INTO 19 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, AND OTHER COMMON LOTS CASE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 31087 APPLICANT: TAHITI PARTNERS V WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of. La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of August, 2004, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of Tahiti Partners V, to subdivide ± 5.0 acres into 19 single-family residential lots and several lettered lots, located on the south side of Darby Road, ± 1 /4 mile east of corner of Washington Street, more particularly described as: LOT 24 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 32 OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 27th day of July, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on Tentative Tract 31087; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, adopted Resolution 2004-055, recommending approval of Tentative Tract 31087; and WHEREAS, said legally described property is within an area which is part of the approved Sphere of Influence for the City of La Quinta; and, WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 66454 provides that a City may take action on a tentative subdivision map of unincorporated property adjacent to that City, provided that any approval of said map shall be conditioned upon annexation of said property to such City; and, WHEREAS, the La Quinta Community Development [department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2003-480, and determined that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures incorporated into the project approval will mitigate or reduce any potential impacts to a level of non -significance; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following findings to justify approval of Tentative Tract 31087: P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahiMccresoTT31087.doc 41. City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract 31087 Tahiti Partners V Adopted: August 17, 2004 1 . The proposed Tentative Tract Map 31087 is consistent with the City's General Plan with the implementation of Conditions of Approval to provide for adequate storm water drainage, and other infrastructure improvements. The project is consistent with the adopted Low Density Residential land use designation of up to four dwelling units per acre, as set forth in the General Plan. 2. The design and improvements of the proposed Tentative Tract Map 31087 are consistent with the City's General Plan, with the implementation of recommended Conditions of Approval to ensure proper street widths, perimeter walls, parking requirements, and timing of their construction. 3. As conditioned, the design of Tentative Tract 31087 and type of improvements, acquired for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision will not conflict with such easements. 4. The design of Tentative Tract 31087 and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that this issue was considered in Environmental Assessment 2003-480, in which no significant health or safety impacts were identified for the proposed project. 5. The site for Tentative Tract 31087 is physically suitable for the proposal as natural slopes do not exceed 20%, and there are no identified geological constraints on the property that would prevent development pursuant to the geotechnical study prepared for the subdivision. 6. The proposed site for Tentative Tract 31087 is within an approved Sphere of Influence for the City of La Quinta and is adjacent to the City corporate limits. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66454, the City Council may act to approve a tentative map of unincorporated property which meets the aforementioned criteria, provided that such approval is conditioned upon annexation of said property within a specified time period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\ccresoTT31087.doc 42 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract 31087 Tahiti Partners V Adopted: August 17, 2004 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures specified by Environmental Assessment 2003-480, prepared for Tentative Tract Map 31087; 3. That it does hereby grant approval of Tentative Tract Map 31087, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahiMccresoTT31087.doc 43 5 G 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 31087 TAHITI PARTNERS V AUGUST 17, 2004 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When improvement plan approval is required, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc y 561 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The approved SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include 45 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc 5 6 4 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 7. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Darby Road (Local, 60' ROW) - The standard 30 feet from the centerline of Darby Road for a total 60-f6ot ultimate developed right of way. B. PUBLIC STREETS - ON -SITE STREET 1). Lot A (Local, 50' ROW) - The standard 50 foot ultimate developed right of way. C. CUL DE SAC 1). The cul de sac shall conform to the shape shown on the tentative map with a 38-foot curb radius at the bulb or larger, using a smooth curve instead of angular lines similar to the layout shown on the tentative map. 8. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 9. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox 46 r ���` PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc 3 U 3 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 clusters, park lands and common areas on the Final Map. The applicant shall retain ownership of all common lot areas to include street landscaping lots and retention basins, unto itself, its heirs or assignees. 11. Direct vehicular access to Darby Road is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative tract map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final.tract map. 12. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 13. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the. City Engineer. FINAL MAPS 14. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster -image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 15. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified 47 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc v64 .� City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note: the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berm design in the parkway area. B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan and Profile Street, Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top of Wall & Top of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Precise Grading" plan is required to be submitted for approval by the Building and Safety Director and the City Engineer. 16. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 17. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc City Council Resolution 2004- 4, Conditions of Ap proval -Recommended � A Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD file of the to reflect the as -built conditions. sin order Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD f AuteCAD Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. ormat, the City IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 18. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off - site improvements and satisfy .its obligations r fo . secured and executed Subdivision Improvement same, or shall furnish a fully A the construction of such improvements and t Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing he same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, of its obligations for ereof, as may be required by the City. 19. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between P the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tenta � comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Tract Map, shall P nt Security), LQMC. 20. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall inc any existing structures or other obstructions that are no Jude the removal of t improvements; and shall provide for the settingo part of the proposed monumentation. f the final survey 21. Depending on the timing of the development of this Ten the status . of the off -site improvements at the time heave Tract Map, and required to. applicant may be A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the r Of its costs by others. reimbursement C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. , D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be ma de by others. E. To agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require We PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 22. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1/2 if x 11 " reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1/2 91 x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or cable T.V. improvements. 23. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 25. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 26. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: 50 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahiMcccoaTT31087.doc r 'i City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 27. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land so as to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 28. Grading within the parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform to the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six (6) feet of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches 0 8") behind the curb. 51. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc 568 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 29. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 30. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 31. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100-year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 33. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 34. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field, or equivalent system, approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 35. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 36. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin 97.03, and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be 52 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 planted with maintenance free ground cover. For retention basins on individual lots, retention depth shall not exceed two feet. 37. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 38. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to .flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 39. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. HT'll ITIFS 40. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 41. The applicant shall obtain approval of the City Engineer for location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum practical and aesthetic placement. 42. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval/by the City Engineer. 43. Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) will require additional facilities for expansion of domestic water and sewer service for this project. These may include well site locations, water and sewer pipelines. Applicant shall satisfy the requirements of the District as set forth by letter, dated August 15, 2004, or as may otherwise be required by CVWD. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 44. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are 3 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc J t7 �� City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 proposed. 45. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1 ' . Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 46. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses): A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Darby Road (Local; 60' R/W): Widen the north side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Tentative Map boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The north curb face shall be located 20 feet (20') south of the centerline. Other required improvements in the Darby Road right-of-way include: a) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b) 6-foot wide sidewalk. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading, traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). B. ON -SITE STREETS 1). Lot A - Construct Jull 36-foot wide travel width gutter flow line to gutter flow line improvements within a 50-foot right-of-way where the local streets are double loaded. 54 C. CUL DE SACS r�- '7 � PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahiMcccoaTT31087.doc J ' - City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 1) . Cul-de-sacs shall be constructed to Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul-de-sacs and Standard 800A for offset Cul-de- sacs, and both shall be constructed with a 38-foot curb radius, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. 47. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic), or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Local 4.0" a.c./5.0" c.a.b. 48. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Darby Road): Full turn movements. 49. Improvements shall include traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians, if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 50. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. CONSTRUCTION 51. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. FIRE MARSHAL 52. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each 5 ) P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc V1 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 intersection and spaced 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a 2- hour duration at 20 PSI. 53. Blue dot retro-reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 54. Any turn or turn -around requires a minimum 38-foot turning radius. 55. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. Two sets of water plans are to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. 56. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. LANDSCAPING 57. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. All landscape plans shall comply with the requirements of La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 8.13, pertaining to Water Efficient Landscaping. 58. The applicant shall provide landscaping in any required parkways, retention basins, and common areas. Landscaped planters shall be incorporated along the Darby Road perimeter walls. 59. All required landscape and irrigation plans shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 60. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no 56 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 TahiMcccoaTT31087.doc . 5 '� 3 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 lawn or spray irrigation being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 61. Specific landscape requirements for the project are: A. No more than 50% of any front yard area shall be devoted to turf. Front yard landscaping shall consist of at least two trees, each with a minimum 1.5 inch caliper measured three feet up from grade level after planting, ten 5-gallon shrubs, and groundcover. Palm trees may count as a shade tree if the trunk is a minimum six feet tall. Double lodge poles (two-inch diameter) shall be used to stake trees. Bubblers and emitters shall be used to irrigate shrubs and trees. Homebuyers shall be offered a 100% desert landscape option. B. Parkway shade trees shall be provided in the perimeter landscape improvement plans for Darby Road, to be of a minimum 24-inch box size with a minimum two-inch caliper. QUALITY ASSURANCE 62. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 63. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 64. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 65. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans that were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. 57 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc ; City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 MAINTENANCE 66. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 67. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping on Darby Road and Lot "A", the retention basin and all related appurtenances to include sand filter and landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant shall create a Home Owners Association or a Maintenance Association for such continuous and perpetual maintenance. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 68. Revisions to the tentative map during plan check including, but not limited to, lot line alignments, easements, improvement plan revisions, and similar minor changes which do not alter the design (layout, street pattern, etc.) may be administratively approved through the plan check process, with the mutual consent and approval of the Community Development and Public Works Directors. This shall include increases or decreases in number of lots meeting the general criteria above, but involving a change of no more than 5 % of the total lot count of the Tentative Map as approved. Any revisions that would exceed the General Plan density standards, based on net area calculations, must be processed as an amended map, as set forth in Title 13, LQMC. 69. Tentative tract 31087 shall be annexed into the City of La Quinta corporate limits within two years of the date of map approval. Said approval shall not become effective unless and until such annexation to the City has been completed. Any map extension filing shall constitute a request to extend the time limit for annexation, and approval of any such extension shall thereby. run concurrently. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66454, no final map for Tentative Tract 31087, in whole or part, may be approved until annexation to the City has been completed. 70. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of rj P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc :.� ; 7 J City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31087 - Tahiti Partners V August 17, 2004 Occupancy for the project. 71. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. 72. The applicant shall prepare a plan for an integrated block wall along the north side of Lots 1 and 20, for review and approval as part of the landscaping plans for the Darby Road parkway area. Wall design shall integrate the requirements for slope design as set forth in Condition 28. FEES AND DEPOSITS 73. The applicant shall comply with provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposit and fee amounts shall be those in effect upon application for plan check and permits. 74. Provisions shall be made to comply with terms and requirements of the City's Art in Public Places program, as in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 75. Parkland dedication fees shall be determined as set forth in Chapter 13.48 (Park Dedications) of the La Quinta Municipal Code. The required fee shall be paid prior to City Council approval of any final map for Tentative Tract 31087. 76. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). t 77. The applicant/developer shall pay the required mitigation fees for the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard, as in effect at the time of issuance of any grading or other land disturbance permit. 5 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31087 Tahiti\cccoaTT31087.doc U i COUNTRY I CLUD 0o J DRIVE�gp O 42nd.. AVENUE, � O. '- DARBY �?fl Q. - sty FRED- WARING. 9RIVE MILES AYE VUE Zt �..STATE. HWY 11 VICINITY MAC - CAS E MAP CASE No. Tr,3/O� • A1,0717 AWA&S NORTH SC'q LE : AeroS ATTACHMENT 2 L vig ell I It ATTACHWNT 3 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 e) There was mention of a prickly pear cactus garden, and discussion of how the past activities on t property were associated with ranching and agricul re. Provide clarification of the nature of the r ching, or the agriculture, and whether they were hi ric activities. f) There were generalized discussi s on the different paleontology, Indian sections, archaeology, but the conclusions were not comple on identification and how the project relates to the si -area. g) Supply source reference of historical maps used. h) All reports listed on t reference list. 15. Ms. Blevins asked ho soon they could expect the comments back. Staff replied soon as the minutes could be done they would transmit a letter with general comments, and suggestions incl ing the excerpts from the minutes. 16. It/above, d and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sopt Minute Motion 2004-008 to return the Phase I Al and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 3L Environmental for completion, with revisions as stfor the Commission's review at a future meeting. Uapproved. C. Phase I Archaeological Survey Report for Tentative Tract Map 31087 Applicant: Tahiti Partners Archaeological Consultant: L & L Environmental, Inc. Location: South side of Darby Road, east of Washington Street 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Sharp commented this was a heavily developed area. J 1 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 3. Commissioner Puente asked when a Phase II was required. Chairperson Mouriquand explained the Phase II was required when there was something found requiring additional efforts to determine its significance. Also, when the monitor has evidence there may be subsurface artifacts. Subsurface testing may be needed to decide how to craft the mitigation or preservation treatment. 4. Commissioner Puente said in one of the recommendations mentioned under 5.3.1) Archaeology Recommendations (1), Page 16 of the report, there was a request to develop a mitigation plan. Did this mean the archaeologist was anticipating they would be likely to find something? 5. Chairperson Mouriquand replied that was standard language used in the industry. This phrasing allows for justification of monitoring if something is found. If monitoring is recommended, the monitor works with the client and their grading schedule to design an appropriate level of mitigation and monitoring. Some projects don't warrant a full-time monitor. Sometimes the focus is in a certain area. Sometimes you do spot checks to customize the monitoring program to fit the needs of the project. That would be what they were discussing in this report. Staff replied that was right. Ms. Mouriquand added .this project would require a lower level of monitoring effort than required for a village site. 6. Commissioner Wilbur commented the surrounding area seems to have some considerable sites and it would be particularly unique if this site had nothing. 7. Chairperson Mouriquand replied from all the past research, and surveys in that area, it is a highly sensitive area. The parcel may be surrounded by development, but that does not mean there might not be something subsurface on the property. She concurred that monitoring would be appropriate even though nothing was found at the Phase I level. You have to consider what the probability is of something being found on the site. 63 0 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 8. Chairperson Mouriquand made the following comments to Report Archaeologist, Ms. Kristie Blevins: a) A General Land Office (GLO) records search needed to be done for any homestead or land grant historic activities on the property. b) A discussion was needed of the local history as part of the cultural resources investigation procedure. c) Scoping letters to the Cabazon, Torres Martinez and Augustine Indian Bands should be provided. d) There were references to past ranching and agricultural activities. An explanation should be provided of what evidence was on the property for consideration of past ranching and agricultural activities. 9. Chairperson Mouriquand asked about the report comment saying most of the study area had been developed. Was this referring to the radius or the project itself? Ms. Blevins replied it referred to the radius. 10. Chairperson Mouriquand continued the Cultural Context discussion on the Paleo-Indian Period, the Archaic Period, and the Late Prehistoric Period needed to be more relevant to the local area, to create the local, cultural context. The Late Prehistoric discussion was very short. It referenced the Luiseno, and the generalized San Luis Rey complex, but it didn't discuss Cahuilla, late prehistory archaeology and culture at all. It didn't discuss prehistory at all or tie it into the Cahuilla or local tribes. There was mention of Luiseno and San Luis complex, which is considered regional, but there is no discussion of the local area. 11. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if there was a source of references for the historical maps. Ms. Blevins replied the historic maps would have been from the Eastern Information Center (EIC). 12. Chairperson Mouriquand said there was discussion about Federal Laws. Was this because there was Federal involvement in this project, or is this a CEQA project. Staff replied this was a CEQA project. 64 58 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 13. Chairperson Mouriquand had some additional comments centered on the historic period and explanation of the ranching that was identified as being associated with the parcel. She suggested, rather than going over each item, staff could provide Ms. Blevins with a commentary to assist her in revising the report. Ms. Blevins replied that would be very helpful. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Sharp and Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2004-009 to return the Phase I Archaeology Survey Report for Tentative Tract Map 31087, to L & L Environmental for completion, with revisions as stated above, for the Commission for review at a future meeting. Unanimously approved. D. Interim Phase Il\Cultural Archaeological Test Program for Tentative. Tract Map 32201 Applicant: Choic\staf Archaeological Cochaeological Advisory Group Location: Northwf Madison Street and Avenue 60 1. Principal n Sawa presented the information contained ieport, a copy of which is on file in the CommunityDepartment. 2. Commissioner Sharp asked 'f the tamarisks had been taken out. The applicant's representativ , Dave Saccullo, 74-923 Highway 1 1 1, Suite 114, Indian Wells, alifornia, introduced himself and replied the tamarisks had not een taken out. He had been notified he needed a Paleontolog Report which was currently being done by Mike Hogan of M TECH, and should be available by June .1, 2004. Mr. Sa ullo asked if he had the Paleontologist submit a letter verify there have been no relevant sites at this location could he o ahead with clearing and grubbing. Staff indicated that the cli is position as long as the Paleontological Report and monit ing were done it would be acceptable. They would need t check to make certain that the person doing the monitorin was qualified. Dave Saccullo said Mike Hogan's firm would a doing the Archaeology and Paleontology monitoring. 65 ATTACHMENT 4 Of ,�, auinfw MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Steve Speer, Assistant City Engineer DATE: July 26, 2004 RE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31087 TAHITI PARTNERS V The following changes to the abovementioned conditions are recommended by the Public Works Department. Amend Condition 9 to read: 9. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the final map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. Add this sentence to the end of Condition 10: The applicant shall retain ownership of all common lot areas to include street landscaping lots and retention basins, unto itself, its heirs, or assignees. Amend Condition 67 to read: 67. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping on Darby Road and Lot "A", the retention basin and all related appurtenances to include sand filter and landscaping, access drives and sidewalks. The applicant shall create a Home Owners Association or a Maintenance Association for such continuous and perpetual maintenance. 66 1 of 1 "" 8 3 ATTACHMENT s Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 7. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/La ner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-052, proving Conditional Use Permit 96-028, Amendment #1, as reco mended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and 9hairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners K eger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. 8. It was moved and seconded by Commission s Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 200 -053, approving Site Development Permit 2004-808, as amen d: a. Condition #6: Additional CVW Z easement at the existing driveway at the Vista Grande insection to provide access to the Sewer Lift Station loca ed in the Whitewater Storm Channel right of way as ex Ibited in the Jefferson Street Widening Phase II - J fferson Street Right -of -Way Dedication. The aforeme ioned easement shall be waived if the applicant accept an offer of payment for such easement in the amou t of $3,103 from the City of La Quinta. b. Property Rights add he following: "All above -mentioned right-of-way dedica ions and/or acceptance of offer shall be made within 30 d ys of approval of this site Development Permit. ROLL CALL: AYES: Comm' sioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: one. 9. It was moved a d seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Minute otion 2004-013, approving Sign Permit 2004797, as recomme ed: ROLL CALL: YSN: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. AIN: None. B. Continued - Environmental Assessment 2003-480 and Tentative Tract Map 31087; a request of Tahiti Partners V, LLC for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and consideration of a subdivision of ± 5 acres into 10 single-family lots for the property 67 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 584 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 located on the south side of Darby Road, t 1 /4 mile east of Washington Street. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff noted changes to the conditions as recommended by the Public Works Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioners Daniels asked about the requirement for a uniform perimeter road. Staff stated it would be located along the property line of Darby Road. Staff is requesting a common architectural design for the wall. 3. Chairman Kirk asked about the Phase I Archaeological Report being remanded. Staff explained the Historical Preservation Commission's reasons for remanding the first report back to the applicant. They were asking that specific issues be discussed in more detail in the report. Commissioner Kirk asked how long this took and did the recommendations change from the first report to the second. Staff stated it was submitted in May 20, 2004 and staff received it back in July, 2004, and no further recommendations were made. 4. Commissioner Daniels noted he thought a development proposal had been reviewed for this site. Staff noted a proposal had been submitted for the area south of this project and it was denied at the Council level. Also, a residential proposal had been proposed for another adjacent area. Staff went on to explain the proposals locations for this entire corner. 5. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dan Beal, representing the applicant, gave a history of the project. It is their intent to build the site and not develop just the lots. He has reviewed all the conditions including the revisions and has no objections. 6. Chairman Kirk asked why the grading plan did not show any sewer lines. Mr. Beal stated there are no existing sewer lines, but they will flow to Darby Road. They will meet all of CVWD requirements G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc J 3 :a Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 and noted where the existing lines were on the tract map. Chairman Kirk asked the process to have this done as it is not on the map. Staff noted it would be accomplished through the final map process. If it required a redesign of the map, it would be brought back through the approval process. Chairman Kirk asked where the retaining walls would be located. Mr. Beal stated they would be on the eastern boundary and indicated them on the map. Discussion followed. 7. Chairman Kirk asked if the Historic Preservation Commission processed caused any unneeded delay. Mr. Beal stated he was surprised, but it was necessary. 8. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-054, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-480, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. 10. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-055, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 31087, as amended: a. Condition #9: The applicant shall offer for dedication on the final map a ten foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. b. Condition #10: The applicant shall retain ownership of all common lot areas to include street landscaping lots and retention basins, unto itself, its heirs, or assignees. C. Condition #67: The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all on -site �9 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 5 8U Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 improvements, perimeter landscaping on Darby Road and Lot "A", the retention basin and all related appurtenances to include sand filter and landscaping, access drives and sidewalks. The applicant shall create a Homeowners' Association or a Maintenance Association for such continuous and perpetual maintenance. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. C. Environmental Assessment 2004-495 and Tentative Tract Map 31852; a \sinn Ehline Company for consideration of a Mitigated Negative of environmental impact and the subdivision of 8.5 acres into amily lots for the property located at the northwest corner of treet and Avenue 52. 1. Chairma Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. ssociate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information c tained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community De lopment Department. 2. There being no que ions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to dress the Commission. Mr. Larry Ellison, representing the Ehline Co pany, stated they had no objections to the conditions as amended. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there was ny other public comment. Mr. John Gamlin, representing The Hi away, stated his concerns about the street improvements fo Avenue 52, screening requirements for the maintenance buildin , as well as the lighting. They would like to ensure they compl with the Dark Sky Ordinance. He also sees no reimbursement co dition for the street improvements they have completed. Assista t City Engineer Steve Speer stated noted the process that wo need to be followed to receive what was due them through th Developer Impact Fees. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated that in gard to the landscaping lighting requirements, they will be review e uring the plan check process in accordance with the conditions. he landscape plans will be brought back for approval. 70 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 8 7 C Lv r r l� 4 OF'I'9 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2004 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolutions 1) Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-495; and 2) Approving Tentative Tract 31852, a 14-Lot Subdivision on ± 8.5 Acres, on the Northwest Corner of Avenue 52 and Madison Street. Applicant: Ehline Company RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: I Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-495, pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Resolution; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 31852, subject to the attached conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Tentative Tract site (Attachment 1) is vacant desert land. The site has been significantly disturbed by illegal dumping and past agricultural activities, associated with date palm farming from the mid-1950's to the early 1980's. There are no Williamson Act contracts on the property. Agricultural uses occur to the north of the site, and to the east, across Madison Street. Residential development is occurring to the south and west of the subject property. The site is not located in an area of sensitivity for any of the species of concern mapped in the General Plan. Vegetation on the site consists of species common to the Valley floor, and non-native species. The site is surrounded on its south and east sides by roadways, on the north by an orchard, and on the west by vacant but graded lands (La Quinta Polo Estates). 588 Project Proposal The applicant is requesting approval of a single-family detached home subdivision with 14 lots in the RVL (up to two dwelling units per acre) zoning district (Attachment 2). The lots will range in area from 20,002 to 21,996 square feet, averaging 20,482 square feet. The only street within the project is a looped cul-de-sac extension from Madison Street, which will be brought into the site to a length of about 800 feet. The proposed private street will have a 60 foot right-of-way entry throat for the first 105 feet, narrowing to a 38 foot right-of-way for the remaining distance. Madison Street will be improved at a 50-foot half -width, while Avenue 52 will be at a 55-foot half - width. A small detention basin is shown in the southeast corner of the site, between Lots 9 and 10. Public Agency Review Staff transmitted the applicant's request to all responsible and concerned public agencies. All comments received are on file at the Community Development Department, and have been incorporated into the attached Conditions of Approval, where necessary and appropriate. Public Notice This case was originally advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on July 27, 2004. All property owners within 500-feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required. No comments have been received. Any correspondence received prior to the meeting will be transmitted to the City Council Historic Preservation Commission On May 20, 2004, the City's Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) (Attachment 3) reviewed the property owner's Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report, prepared by L&L Environmental, Inc. The HPC found the investigation to be insufficient in its content, and remanded it back to L&L for revisions. The revised survey was presented back to HPC on July 15, 2004, with the contents and findings of the report accepted (Attachment 3). The survey included both records search and on -site investigations. The records search identified a number of previous archaeological finds within one mile of the project site, as well as identifying the project site as within the historic lakebed of ancient Lake Cahuilla. The study further found that disturbance of the site could result in a significant impact to paleontological resources. The on -site survey did not identify any resources on the site. However, due to potential for buried resources on the site, the survey recommends that both archaeological and paleontological monitors be present during earth moving activities. The HPC concurred with the report recommendation to monitor the site, and the Planning Commission is recommending these measures as mitigation measures in the environmental documents. Planning Commission Action On July 27, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 2004 - 056 and 2004 - 057, recommending certification of the Environmental Assessment, and approval of the project, subject to findings and conditions as have been provided in the attached City Council Resolutions. Discussion focused on the following matters: • Addition of a condition to require a 10-foot wide multi -use trail along Madison Street. After discussion, Conditions 13(A) and 52(A)(2)(c) were revised as requested by memorandum from the Public Works Department, dated 7/23/04 (Attachment 4) . Minutes from the July 27, 2004 Planning Commission meeting are incorporated as Attachment 5. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Findings necessary to approve the development applications can be made and are contained in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-495, pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Resolution; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 31852, subject to the attached conditions; or 2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council, certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and approving the Tentative Tract Map; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Oscar W. Ord Interim Community Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Proposed TT 31852 3. Minutes of HPC meeting of May 20, 2004 4. Memorandum of 7/23/04 from Public Works 5. Minutes of Planning Commission meeting of 7/27/04 591 RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-495, FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31852 CASE NO. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2003-495 APPLICANT: EHLINE COMPANY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of August, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Ehline Company, for certification of Environmental Assessment 2003-495, prepared for Tentative Tract 31852, located on the northwest corner of Avenue 52 and Madison Street, more particularly described as: LOT 2 OF TR 6682, BOOK 88, PAGES 42/43 OF MAPS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 27th day of July, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider adoption of a recommendation on Environmental Assessment 2003-495, prepared for Tentative Tract 31852, a request to subdivide ± 8.5 acres into 14 single-family residential lots and several lettered lots; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, adopted Resolution 2004-056, recommending adoption of Environmental Assessment 2003-495; and WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, City Council Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2003-495) and has determined that, although the proposed Tentative Tract 31852 could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures incorporated into the project approval will mitigate or reduce any potential impacts to a level of non -significance, and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact should be filed; and'. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the La Quinta City Council did make the following findings to justify their certification of said Environmental Assessment: ` PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cceareso495.doc 5 9 (� City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2003-495 Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 1. The proposed Tentative Tract 31852 will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the project in question will not be developed in any manner inconsistent with the General Plan and other current City standards when considering the required mitigation measures to be imposed. The project will not have the potential to substantially reduce or cause the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The site has been identified as having the potential for cultural and paleontological resources. However, mitigation measures have been incorporated which will reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. 2. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or`the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 3. The proposed Tentative Tract 31852 will not have the potential to achieve short term goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on. environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. The proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing opportunities for City residents. 4. The proposed Tentative Tract 31852 will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, in that development activity in the area has been previously analyzed as part of the project approval process. Cumulative project impacts have been considered and mitigation measures proposed in conjunction with approval of those projects, and development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. The construction of 14 residential units will not have considerable cumulative impacts and is consistent with the General Plan. 5. The proposed Tentative Tract 31852 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan. No significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 19 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cceareso495.doc r j 9 3 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2003-495 Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 6. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 7. The City Council has considered EnvironmentO Assessment 2003-495 and determined that it reflects the independent judgment of the City. 8. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 9. The location and custodian of City records relating to this project is the Community Development Department, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That is does hereby certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2003-495 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, attached hereto, and on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cceareso495.doc City Council Resolution No. 2004- Environmental Assessment 2003-495 Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta no P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cceareso495.doc 95 Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project title: Tentative Tract Map 31852 2. Lead agency name and address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact person and phone number: Wally Nesbit 760-777-7125 4. Project location: Northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 52. APN: 772-270-016 5. Project sponsors name and address: Ehline Company 81480 National Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General plan designation: Very Low Density 7. Zoning: Very Low Density Residential Residential 8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Proposed subdivision of 8.47 acres into 14 single family lots of 20,000 square feet or more, and lettered lots for retention, streets and landscaped parkway. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: North: Agriculture, (Very Low Density Agriculture) South: Avenue 52, golf course and single family residential, (Low Density Residential and Golf Course Open Space) West: Vacant desert lands (Very Low Density Residential) East: Agriculture 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coachella Valley Water District PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc J�b ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities / Service Systems Agriculture Resources Cultural Resources Hydrology / Water Quality Noise Recreation Air Quality Geology /Soils Land Use / Planning Population / Housing Transportation/Traffic Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the X environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) .has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. June 24, 2004 Signature Date 10 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc J � � EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement, is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Ched dist.doc 7 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a proj ect's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, X including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Aerial photograph) c) Substantially degrade the existing X visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial X light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) I. a)-d) The proposed project site is located on an Agrarian Image Corridor (Madison Street), and a Secondary Image Corridor (Avenue 52), according to the General Plan. These corridor have landscaped parkway requirements to which the applicant will be required to comply. The site does not include, nor is it near, a scenic resource. The proposed project will result in single family lots on approximately 1/2 acre lots. The City regulates height in residential zones, so .that the maximum potential height for the homes would be two stories. Given the size of the proposed lots, the homes will not create a significant impact to views in the area. The ultimate construction of single family homes on the site will result in a slight increase in light generation, primarily from car headlights and landscape lighting. The City regulates lighting levels and. does not allow lighting to spill over onto adjacent property. Impacts will not be significant. 12 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Checklist.doc J 1� Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact H. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique X Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (General Plan Land Use Map) II. a)-c) The proposed project site is vacant desert land. There are no Williamson Act contracts on the property. Agricultural lands occur on the north side of the site, and to the east, across Madison Street. The development of the proposed project will not affect the ability of these surrounding parcels to continue in agriculture. Development is located to the north and west of these lands, and they represent isolated locations for farming. The site is located in an area of the City which is urbanizing, and represents a logical extension of development in the City. Impacts to agricultural resources are expected to be less than significant. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct X implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any air quality standard or X contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable X net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2002 PM 10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to X substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) III. a), b) & c) The Tentative Tract Map will ultimately result in the construction of 14 single family homes, which could generate up to 134 trips per day'. Based on this traffic generation, and an average trip length of 10 miles, the following emissions can be expected to be generated from the project site. 1 "Trip Generation, 6 h Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, Single Family Detached category 210. 14 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc - 6Lj1 Moving Exhaust Emission Projections at Project Buildout pounds per day) Ave. Trip Total Total No. Vehicle Trips/Day Length (miles) miles/day 134 x 10 = 1,340 PM10 PM10 PM10 Pollutant ROC CO NOX Exhaust Tire Wear Brake Wear Grams at 50 mph 120.60 3,135.60 643.20 - 13.40 13.40 Pounds at 50 mph 0.27 6.92 1.42 - 0.03 0.03 SCAQMD Threshold (lbs./day) 75 550 100 150 Assumes 134 ADT. Based on California Air Resources Board's EMFAC7G Emissions Model. Assumes Year 2005 summertime running conditions at 75°F, light duty autos, catalytic. As demonstrated above, the proposed project will not exceed any of SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds. The project's potential impacts to air quality from moving emissions are therefore expected to be less than significant. The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (Particulates of 10 microns or less). The Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan adopted much stricter measures for the control of dust both during the construction process and during project operations. These include the following, to be included in conditions of approval for the proposed project: CONTROL MEASURE TITLE & CONTROL METHOD BCM-1 Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities: Watering, chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control BCM-2 Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access restriction, revegetation BCM-3 Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical stabilization, access restriction, revegetation BCM-4 Paved Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road shoulders, clean streets maintenance The proposed project will generate dust during construction. Under mass grading conditions, this could result in the generation of. 223.6 pounds per day, for a limited period while grading operations are active. The contractor will be required to submit a PM 10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 15 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Checklist.doc U 'J 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Imported fill shall be adequately watered prior to transport, covered during transport, and watered prior to unloading on the project site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on- going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Any area which remains undeveloped for a period of more than 30 days shall be stabilized using either chemical stabilizers or a desert wildflower mix hydroseed on the affected portion of the site. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Landscape parkways on Madison and Avenue 52 shall be installed with the first phase of development on the site. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction - related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour Implementation of these mitigation measures will ensure that impacts associated with PM 10 are mitigated to a less than significant level. III. d) & e) The project will consist of single family homes and will not result in objectionable odors, nor will it expose residents to concentrations of pollutants. L PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc J Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would theproject: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, X either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on X any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on X federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the X movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or X ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) f) Conflict with the provisions of an X adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Cheddist.doc 17 U Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (General Plan Exhibit 6.3) IV. a)-f) The proposed project site has been significantly disturbed by past agricultural activities and illegal dumping. The site is not located in an area of sensitivity for any of the species of concern mapped in the General Plan. Vegetation on the site consists of species common to the Valley floor, and non-native species. The site is surrounded on two sides by roadways, on one side by an orchard, and on one side by vacant but graded lands. The site does not provide significant habitat value, and is not a wildlife corridor. The proposed project site is located outside the mitigation fee area for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard. 48 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Cheeklist.doc 6 5 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of a historical resource as defined in'15064.5? (Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852..." L&L Environmental, April 2004) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to ' 15064.5? (Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852..." L&L Environmental, April 2004) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract fA 31852..." L&L Environmental, April 2004) d) Disturb any human remains, including X those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852..." L&L Environmental, April 2004) V. a)-c), e) A Phase I archaeological survey was conducted on the subject property2. The survey included both records searches and on -site investigations. The records searches identified a number of previous historic and prehistoric finds within one mile of the project site. The on -site survey did not identify any resources on the site. However, because of the potential for buried resources on the site, the survey recommends that an archaeological monitor be present during earth moving activities, to assure that potential impacts are reduced to a less than significant level, as follows. 1. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit, whichever occurs first. Monitors shall include a representative of the Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. 2 "A Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852..." prepared by L&L Environmental, April 2004. 49 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc ^ - l� �� V The monitor shall be empowered to stop or redirect activities, should resources be uncovered. A report of any findings, as well as appropriate curation of materials, shall be completed and submitted to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of building permits on the site. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy for the proj ect. 2. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. With the implementation of the mitigation measures listed above, impacts to cultural resources shall be reduced to a less than significant level. V. d) A paleontologic assessment was conducted for the project site 3. The study found that the project site is within the historic lakebed of ancient Lake Cahuilla. The study further found that disturbance of the site could result in a significant impact to paleontological resources. In order to assure that these impacts are mitigated to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1. On- and off -site monitoring in areas identified as likely to contain paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Proof that a monitor has been retained shall be given to the City prior to issuance of the first earth -moving permit, of before any clearing of the site as begun. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. 2. A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens shall be submitted to the City prior to the first occupancy of a residence being granted by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions of the significance of all recovered resources where appropriate. The report and inventory, when submitted will signify completion of the. program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. 3 Ibid PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc i� O 3. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City. Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall comply with standards commonly used in the paleontological industry. Implementation of these mitigation measure will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Checklist.doc V�V Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, X as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X ("Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development NWC Avenue 52 and Madison..." Sladden Engineering, April 2004) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, X including liquefaction? ("Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development NWC Avenue 52 and Madison..." Sladden Engineering, April 2004) iv) Landslides? ("Geotechnical Investigation X Proposed Residential Development NWC Avenue 52 and Madison..." Sladden Engineering, April 2004) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or X the loss of topsoil? ("Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development NWC Avenue 52 and Madison..." Sladden Engineering, April 2004) d) Be located on expansive soil, as X defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property ("Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development NWC Avenue 52 and Madison..." Sladden Engineering, April 2004) e) Have soils incapable of adequately X supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc - 2� where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? ("Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development NWC Avenue 52 and Madison..." Sladden Engineering, April 2004) VI. a)-e) A geotechnical investigation was conducted for the proposed proj ect4. The study found that the site is not located in an Alquist Priolo Study zone, but will experience significant groundshaking in the event of an earthquake in the Coachella Valley. Borings were taken on the site to determine if a liquefaction hazard exists. No groundwater was identified to a depth of 50 feet. The study therefore concludes that the site is not subject to liquefaction. The study further found that the soils on the site are not expansive, and that the site will not be subject to landslides. The study will be connect to sanitary sewer service, and soils will not be impacted by septic tanks. Impacts associated with soils and geology are expected to be less than significant. The project site is located in an area of very severe blow sand potential. The mitigation measures included above under air quality are designed to mitigate the potential impacts associated with blow sand at the project site to a less than significant level. 4 Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development NWC Avenue 52 and Madison Street..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, April 2004. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc (} s U 1 'J Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application materials) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle X hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application materials) d) Be located on a site which is included X on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it .create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or X physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency 24 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Cheddist.doc - �� •i evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff) h) Expose people or structures to a X significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VII. a)-h) The construction of single family residential units on the proposed project site will not result in significant impacts associated with hazardous materials. The City implements the standards of the Household Hazardous Waste programs through its waste provider. These regulations and standards ensure that impacts to surrounding areas, or within the project itself, are less than significant. The site is not in an area subject to wildland fires. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Checklist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER UALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or X waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater X supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff. c) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? ("Preliminary Drainage Study Tentative Tract No. 31852" prepared by Hacker Engineering, November 2003.) d) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? ("Preliminary Drainage Study Tentative Tract No. 31852" prepared by Hacker Engineering, November 2003.) e) Create or contribute runoff water X which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional n� PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc - - ( � V�� sources of polluted runoff? ("Preliminary Drainage Study Tentative Tract No. 31852" prepared by Hacker Engineering, November 2003.) f) Place housing within a 100-year flood X hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard X area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) VIII. a) & b) Domestic water is supplied to the project site by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The eventual development of the site will result in the need for domestic water service for residential units, commercial uses and landscaping. The CVWD has prepared a Water Management Plan which indicates that it has sufficient water sources to accommodate growth in its service area. The CVWD has implemented or is implementing water conservation, purchase and replenishment measures which will result in a surplus of water in the long term. The project proponent will also be required to implement the City's water efficient landscaping and construction provisions, which will ensure that the least amount of water is utilized within the homes. The applicant will also be required to comply with the City's NPDES standards, requiring that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters. These City standards will assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than significant. VIII. c) & d) The City requires that all projects retain the 100 year storm on site. A preliminary drainage study was prepared to address this requirement for the proposed projects. The study analysed the potential water generated in a 100 year storm, and developed recommendations for the size of the on -site retention basin. The retention basin is shown on the Tract Map, immediately north of Avenue 52. The City Engineer will review and approve the drainage analysis for the site, prior to the issuance of any permits. These City requirements are expected to lower potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. e)-g) The site is not located in a flood zone as designated by FEMA. 5 "Preliminary Drainage Study Tentative Tract No. 31852," prepared by Hacker Engineering, November, 2003. 4 i PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Cheddist.doc 614 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established X community? (Aerial photo) b) Conflict with any applicable land use X plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 74 ff.) IX. a)-c) The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use category in which it is located, and the lots are designed to be similar in size to approved maps located to the east. The site is currently vacant, and will have no impact on an existing community. The site is not within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan fee area. w8 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Cheddist.doc G .� 5 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a X known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a X locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) X. a) & b) The proposed project site is within the MRZ-1 Zone, and is therefore not considered to have potential for mineral resources. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation X of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ("Tentative Tract 31852 Preliminary Acoustical Study," prepared by RK Engineering Group, April 2004) b) Exposure of persons to or generation X of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) c) A substantial permanent increase in X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) d) A substantial temporary or periodic X increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) XI. a)-f) An acoustical study was completed for the proposed project6. The study found that noise levels for lands immediately adjacent to both Madison Street and Avenue 52 will exceed the City's exterior noise standards. Specifically, the study found that noise levels on lots 6 "Tentative Tract 31852 Preliminary Acoustical Study," prepared by RK Engineering Group, April 2004. 30 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc adjacent to Avenue 52 will be about 68.0 dBA CNEL, and noise levels at lots on Madison Street will be 68.6 dBA CNEL without mitigation. Since noise impacts are linear, the study recommends the installation of a 5 foot wall along both roadways, which will reduce noise levels to between 57.9 and 63.3 dBA CNEL, depending on location. In order to assure that the noise levels meet City standards, therefore, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. A perimeter wall of at least 5 feet in height shall be installed immediately following precise grading of the site. The wall shall be of solid construction, and shall not have any openings or breaks. The construction of homes on the site will also generate noise. The site is not, however, located adjacent to any sensitive receptors. Impacts associated with construction noise are not expected to be significant. The site is not located in the vicinity of an air strip or airport. 3 1.. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc 618 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth X in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of X existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of X people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) XII. a)-c) The proposed Tract Map is currently vacant desert lands, and construction of the project will not displace an existing community. The development of single family homes on lots of approximately 1/2 acre is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations on the project site, and will not generate a substantial population growth in the area. Impacts are expected to be negligible. 32 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc ' 1..; JL Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIH. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.) X Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks X Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, x p. 46 ff.) XIII. a) Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate sales and property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services, as well as the costs of general government. The project will be required to pay the mandated school fees and park in lieu fees in place at the time of issuance of building permits. 33 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc 6 020 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of X existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application materials) b) Does the project include recreational X facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application materials) XIV. a) & b) The construction of 14 residential units within the project will be supported by the payment of the City's parkland fee, to mitigate any additional impact to City parks. 34 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc - Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is X substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or X cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic X patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a X design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Tentative Tract Map 31852) e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? (Tentative Tract Map 31852) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X (Tentative Tract Map 31852) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, X or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project description) XV. a)-g) The construction of 14 homes will not have a significant impact on the City's circulation system. The density proposed for the site is consistent with the General Plan designation for the property, and was therefore analysed in the General Plan EIR. Madison and PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA CheddistAm 35 Avenue 52 are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service at buildout of the General Plan. The project map proposes a secondary access point for emergency services off of Avenue 52. This access point will assure that emergency vehicles have a secondary access to the site. The project proponent will be required to provide on -site parking for the homes in the form of garages. The design of the tract does not include any roadway hazards. The site is within the service area of SunLine, and will eventually be provided bus service as development occurs. J > PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Checklist.doc �. 3 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment X requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of X new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of X new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Have sufficient water supplies X available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) e) Result in a determination by the X wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider=s existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the proj ect's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) g) Comply with federal, state, and local X statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) }7 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Checklist.doc 624 4 XVI. a)-g) Utilities are available at the project site. The service providers for water, sewer, electricity and other utilities have facilities in the immediate vicinity of the site, and will collect connection and usage fees to balance for the cost of providing services. The construction of the proposed project is expected to have less than significant impacts on utility providers. RMS PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Phline\EA Checklist.doc �1 " Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to X degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to X achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? b) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental X effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. a) The site has been identified as having the potential for cultural and paleontological resources. However, mitigation measures proposed above will reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. XVII. b) The proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing opportunities for City residents. XVII. c) The construction of 14 residential units will not have considerable cumulative impacts and is consistent with the General Plan. 39 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Fhline\EA Checklist.doc [�?? �.�'V XVH. d) The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect human beings, due to air quality and noise impacts. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non -attainment area for PM 10, and the site will generate PM10, Section III), above, includes a number of mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts on air quality. Noise impacts have been mitigated above to less than significant levels. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Not applicable. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. Not applicable. 40 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\EA Checklist.doc V 1 A-W A U p�q �A a� o� • U o 0 a.A COO. - to � � o L7 o o 9 9 U U U m N • 4 U U bU bo :b o (n O Ow to b to a w � � a �o d d la, Cd EA to to bo b �A T-, � a� o v O O a cd C o O O 'r O c 0 O O N m kn raj 9v bo r '" � ¢ a > N .d g CIS 41. 6�� F A V p�q �AWW ax �wV OV � o � � a o L7 °A an � o A O w� 0 a� b o� UA Cd V � Cd rArn c o p4o lo-a O Cd V Cd 4 'd Cd O O ao� A Q. O. F A U p�q �A a� O� UU o U � a� � o 40. b 4 �d U a a w c� a Cd b O E, 3 a w O 40. z 6�� RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT 31852, SUBDIVIDING t 8.5 ACRES INTO 14 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, AND OTHER COMMON LOTS CASE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 31852 APPLICANT: EHLINE COMPANY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17th day of August, 2004, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of the Ehline Company to subdivide t 8.5 acres into 14 single-family residential lots and certain lettered lots, located on the northwest corner of Avenue 52 and Madison Street, more particularly described as: LOT 2 OF TR 6682, BOOK 88, PAGES 42/43 OF MAPS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 27th day of July, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on Tentative Tract 31852; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta adopted Resolution 2004.057, recommending approval of Tentative Tract 31852; and WHEREAS, the La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2003-495, and determined that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures incorporated into the project approval will mitigate or reduce any potential impacts to a level of non -significance; and! WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the La Quinta City Council did make the following findings to justify approval of Tentative Tract 31852: 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map 31852 is consistent with the City's General Plan, with the implementation of Conditions of Approval, to provide for adequate storm water drainage, and other infrastructure improvements. The project is consistent with the adopted Very Low Density Residential land use designation of Up to 2 dwelling units per acre, as set forth in the General Plan. 43 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\ccresoTT31852.doc (330 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 2. The design and improvements of the proposed Tentative Tract Map 31852 are consistent with the City's General Plan, with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval to ensure proper street widths, perimeter walls, parking requirements, and timing of their construction. 3. As conditioned, the design of Tentative Tract 31852 and type of improvements, acquired for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision will not conflict with such easements. 4. The design of Tentative Tract 31852 and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that this issue was considered in Environmental Assessment 2003-495, in which no significant health or safety impacts were identified for the proposed project. 5. The site for Tentative Tract 31852 is physically suitable for the proposal as natural slopes do not exceed 20%, and there are no identified geological constraints on the property that would prevent development pursuant to the geotechnical study prepared for the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures specified by Environmental Assessment 2003-495, prepared for Tentative Tract Map 31852; 3. That it does hereby grant approval of Tentative Tract Map 31852, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 17th day of August, 2004, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ccresoTT31852 City Council Resolution No. 2004- Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ccresoTT31852 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2004- EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31852 EHLINE COMPANY AUGUST 17, 2004 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the applicable clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf City Council Resolution No. 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). The applicant or his/her designer can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. 47 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cccoaTT31852.rtf City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852- - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 F. The approved SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 7. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial, Option A, 1 10' ROW) - The standard 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 52 for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right of way except for an additional right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Madison Street (Primary Arterial, Option A 110' ROW) - The standard 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 52 for a total 110- foot ultimate developed right of way except for an additional right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 3) Dedicate an approximate 300 square foot area behind the corner cutback area at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 52, to allow for improvements associated with a Secondary Gateway designation for this intersection. 8. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right- of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf `- U_J City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 9. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS a. Private Residential Streets shall have a 36-foot travel width measured at gutter flow line to gutter flow line. B. CUL DE SACS 1) The cul de sac shall conform to the shape shown on the tentative map with a 38-foot curb radius at the bulb or larger as shown on the tentative map. 10. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1" equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line and lane line alignment including lane widths. The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement 11. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right- of-ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 13. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf 49 V v City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 A. Avenue 52 and Madison Street (Primary Arterial, Option A) - A minimum 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final. Map. 15. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street and Avenue 52 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative tract map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 16. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 17. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAPS 18. Prior to the City's approval. of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster -image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS 50 P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cccoaTT31852.rtf City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 19. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 20. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. On -Site Street Plan: 1 it = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical C. On -Site Rough Grading/Storm Drain Plans 1 if = 40' Horizontal D. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 of = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top of Wall & Top of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 21. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf 51. Cv8 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 elements of construction on the Public Works Online Engineering Library at http://www.la-quinta.org/publicworks/tractl/z_onlinelibrary/0_intropage.htm. 22. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 23. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 24. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 25. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 26. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 28. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 29. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC, and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 30. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 31. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf 53 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six (6) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 32. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 33. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 34. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 35. Prior to any site grading or grading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 36. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if _submitted at different times. 37. This development shall comply with Chapter 8.11 (Flood Hazard Regulations), LQMC. If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at 54 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 the foundation) are above the level of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95 % Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are so located, the applicant shall furnish elevation certifications, as required by FEMA, that the above conditions have been met. DRAINAGE 38. The applicant shall revise the proposed retention basin to comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97- 03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 39. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 40. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field or equivalent system approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 41. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 42. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin 97-03, and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. 43. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 44. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, 55 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf V4A40 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 45. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 46. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 47. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 48. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 49. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 50. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 51. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 52.. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT .31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf 56 643 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses). A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial Option A - 1 10' R/W ): Widen the north side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Tentative Map boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The west curb face shall be located forty- three feet (43') north of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit) Other required improvements in the Avenue 52 right or way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. c) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5 feet of the perimeter wall at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. d) A County of Riverside benchmark in the Avenue 52 right of way established by a licensed surveyor. 2) Madison Street (Primary Arterial — Option A, 1 10' R/W): Widen the west side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Tentative Map boundary to its ultimate width on the west side as specified 57 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf 611.4 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The west curb face shall be located forty three feet (43') north of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit) Other required improvements in the Madison Street right or way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. c) 10-foot wide Multi -Use Trail. The applicant shall construct a meandering multi -use trail along the Madison Street frontage within the proposed landscaped setback. Additionally, the applicant's design for the at -grade street crossing of the multi- use trail shall incorporate the use of surface(s) other than concrete and be approved by the Engineering Department. The location and design of the multi -use trail shall also be approved by the Engineering Department. The multi -use trail, trail signs, and the split -rail fence shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. d) Half width of an 18-foot wide raised landscaped median along the entire boundary of the Tentative Tract Map, plus variable width as needed to accommodate a left turn lane for the north bound traffic at the entry. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Lot A - construct full 36-foot wide travel width improvements P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cccoaTT31852.rtf 58 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 measured gutter flow line to gutter flow line except at the entry drive. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Shall be constructed according to the lay -out shown on the tentative map with 38-foot curb radius or greater at the bulb using a smooth curve instead of angular lines similar to the layout shown on the rough grading plan. 53. All gated entries shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic (minimum 60 feet from the curb face to the voice box); and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn -around out onto the main street from the gated entry. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 54. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Primary Arterial 4.5" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. 55. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test 59 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cccoaTT31852.rtf 6 4. 6 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 56. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Primary Entry (Madison Street): Right turns movements in and out and left turn movements in are permitted. Left turn movements out are prohibited. 57. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 58. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. CONSTRUCTION 59. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and .street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 60. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 61. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 62. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf 60 6,4 7 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 architect. 63. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 64. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 65. Landscaping plans for the units shall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance for this project and as approved by the Planning Commission. Said landscaping plans shall include a complete irrigation system showing location and size of water lines, valves, clock timers, type of sprinklers, etc. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the landscape plans shall also be approved by the Coachella Valley Water District before final approval by the Community Development Department. 66. Specific landscape requirements for the project are: A. No more than 50% of any front yard area shall be devoted to turf. Front yard landscaping shall consist of at least two trees, each with a minimum 1.5 inch caliper measured three feet up from grade level after planting, ten 5-gallon shrubs., and groundcover. Double lodge poles (two-inch diameter) shall be used to stake trees. Bubblers and emitters shall be used to irrigate shrubs and trees. Homebuyers shall be offered a 100% desert landscape option. B. Parkway shade trees shall be provided in ' the perimeter landscape improvement plans for Madison Street and Avenue 52, to be of a minimum 24-inch box size with a minimum two-inch caliper. QUALITY ASSURANCE 67. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 68. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cccoaTT31852.rtf 61. C .11.8 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 - Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 69. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 70. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and. completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 71. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 72. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 73. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 74. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 75. Provisions shall be made to comply with terms and requirements of the City's Art in Public Places program, as in effect at the time of building permit issuance. P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf 6 f? 9 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 76. Parkland dedication fees shall be determined as set forth in Chapter 13.48 (Park Dedications) of the La Quinta Municipal Code. The required fee shall be paid prior to City Council approval of any final map for Tentative Tract 31852. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 77. Revisions to the tentative map during plan check including, but not limited to, lot line alignments, easements, improvement plan revisions, and similar minor changes which do not alter the design (layout, street patter, etc.) may be administratively approved through the Substantial Conformance process, with the mutual consent and approval of the Community Development and Public Works Directors. This shall include increase or decrease in number of lots meeting the general criteria above. Any revisions that would exceed the General Plan density standards, based on net area calculations, must be processed as an amended map, as set forth in Title 13, LQMC. 78. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit, whichever occurs first. Monitors shall include a representative of the Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The monitor shall be empowered to stop or redirect activities, should resources be uncovered. A report of any findings, as well as appropriate curation of materials, shall be completed and submitted to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of building permits on the site. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy for the project. 79. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. 80. On- and off -site monitoring in areas identified as likely to contain paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains P:\Reports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Eh1ine\cccoaTT31852.rtf j 63 650 City Council Resolution 2004- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 31852 — Ehline Company Adopted: August 17, 2004 of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Proof that a monitor has been retained shall be given to the City prior to issuance of the first earth -moving permit, of before any clearing of the site as begun. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. 81. A report .of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens shall be submitted to the City prior to the first occupancy of a residence being granted by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions of the significance of all recovered resources where appropriate. The report and inventory, when submitted will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. 82. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City. Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall comply with standards commonly used in the paleontological industry. FIRE DEPARTMENT 83. Fire Department plan check is to run concurrent with the City plan check., Specific fire protection measures will be determined at the time of plan check. 64 PAReports - CC\8-17-04\TT 31852 Ehline\cccoaTT31852.rtf ,,.11 .� AL 65 WC, o♦„o 19 - ;�� ct) ___..... 0 Ike �: aa k .. V �I �o ATTACHMENT 2 Al. i� - Ab ri1r�g hitUb fib all Ia gb 1 gN� e QQ =gil I'l; al 11,11 t ibidg 6R M 6 :.) 3 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa prese,pfted the information contained in the staff report, a copy which is on file in the Community Development Departmen . 2. Commissioner Wilbur comme ed on the first condition regarding earth -moving and gr ding. He asked if that meant the relocation of a large qua ity of earth. Staff replied the condition refers to any t e of earth moving or clearing of vegetation, and trenchin . 3. Commissioner Sharp commented the Commission was aware this is a sensitive rea and was in favor of an archaeologist monitoring the sit . 4. Commissioner uente and Chairperson Mouriquand agreed with staff's recom endations. 5. It was m ved and seconded by Commissioners Puente and Sharp t adopt Minute Motion 2004-007 accepting the Paleon logical Resources Assessment Report for Tentative Tract.Map 32072, Assessors Parcel Numbers 772-410-021 and 022 in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California, suj6ject to conditions. Unanimously approved. B. Archaeological and. Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852 Applicant: Ehline Company Archaeological Consultant: L & L Environmental, Inc. Location: Northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 52 Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Sharp asked what a lacustrine adaptation was. Chairperson Mouriquand replied it referred to a lake environment. Commissioner Sharp said he thought this was a very interesting report, full of history and cultural background. 67 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 3. Commissioner Puente asked who appointed the archaeological monitor. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the applicant is required to contract with someone who is on the County List for professional monitoring. When tribal monitoring is required, the tribe appoints someone who is qualified. Staff added the applicant has to provide the City with evidence of the monitor's qualifications. 4. Commissioner Puente commented on the amount of artifacts collected and wanted to know where they were being stored. Staff replied artifact storage was an item that needed to be discussed. New laws are now in effect regarding how cities can collect and store resources. There will have to be discussion on whether the artifacts can be stored locally. 5. Commissioner Wilbur asked if there was any response from the Native Americans. Staff replied they contacted the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians and the Native American Heritage Commission. They received no comments back. 6. Chairperson Mouriquand commented on the fact that Archeological and Paleontological Resources Reports require two different disciplines with different criteria. When they are combined in one report, it becomes difficult to read 'and can create a problem if something of significance is found requiring detailed discussion. She had additional comments on the archaeology portion but chose to include them in the upcoming conference call with the archaeologist. She added the report needed to relate the history, activities, and the project site in order to determine the significance and eligibility for both the State and National Registers. She found the report lacking and incomplete. 7. Project Archaeologist, Kristie R. Blevins, was unable to attend the meeting and was introduced, via a conference call, to answer any questions the Commissioners had. 68 � )a Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 8. Chairperson Mouriquand asked Ms. Blevins about her comments on past ranching and agricultural activities and how she had arrived at her conclusions. Ms. Blevins replied there were remnants of what appeared to be ranching activities, including a cactus garden and various animal pens. Chairperson Mouriquand asked Ms. Blevins what these things dated to. Ms. Blevins replied they are modern. 9. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if a records search had been done, through the General Land Office (GLO), searching for homesteading and other types of land granting activities on the property. Ms. Blevins replied it had not. She did the records search through the historical map and properties available at the Eastern Information Center. 10. Chairperson Mouriquand said she did not find any general contextual discussion on the local history in the report and the whole historic period was not considered in the report. Ms. Blevins replied they focused more on the prehistoric period because of the prehistoric pottery found on the property. Chairperson Mouriquand commented this was supposed to be a Cultural Resources Investigation and should have included not only the prehistory, but the historic period. Ms. Blevins replied that was correct. 11. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the Torres Martinez or Augustine Band of Indians had been contacted as part of the project scoping and consultation effort. Ms. Blevins replied she thought a letter had been sent to the Cahuilla Band. Chairperson Mouriquand said the Cahuilla Band is located in the Anza Valley and a Scoping Letter should have gone to the Cabazon Band. Ms. Blevins replied she was not familiar with this part of the report. She believed her associates had made contact with Rob Wood of the Native American Heritage Commission to find out who and where to make contact. She didn't personally speak to Rob Wood so she didn't know what went on with that particular conversation, but could find out. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if they sent a request to the Native American Heritage Commission for a sacred land search. Ms. Blevins replied she thought it was done over the phone and not in a formal letter. Chairperson Mouriquand suggested she 69 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 might want to put it in writing to the Native American Heritage Commission. They could then respond, in writing, with comments and an attached list identifying the appropriate Bands to consult. 12. Chairperson Mouriquand stated the Commission needed to have the RPA (Registered Professional Archaeologist) sign and certify the report. Ms. Blevins replied the signatory, Leslie Nay Irish, is the Principal. Chairperson Mouriquand stated Ms. Irish was not a qualified Archaeologist, according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The report has to be signed by somebody who is duly qualified to certify these kinds of reports, as well as certification by the Paleontologist. Ms. Blevins replied it would be done. 13. Chairperson Mouriquand suggested the report be handed back to the Consultant for completion and correction and resubmitted for review at the next Commission meeting. Ms. Blevins was told staff would be sending a letter, with comments, on the reports for her revision. 14. Staff restated the following items needed to be addressed: a) A General Land Office records search for any homesteaded properties. b) Discussion of local history and the historic and prehistoric period context. c) Discussion of the local archaeology and how the site relates to it. d) Correct the Native American reference from the Cahu.illa Band of Mission Indians to the Cabazon Band. Provide Scoping Letters to the Cabazon, Torres Martinez and Augustine Indian Bands. Provide written responses and include in Appendix. 70 Historic Preservation Commission May 20, 2004 e) There was mention of a prickly pear cactus garden, and discussion of how the past activities on the property were associated with ranching and agriculture. Provide clarification of the nature of the ranching, or the agriculture, and whether they were historic activities. f) There were generalized discussions on the different paleontology, Indian sections, archaeology, but the conclusions were not complete on identification and how the project relates to the site area. g) Supply source references of historical maps used. h) All reports listed on the reference list. 15. Ms. Blevins asked how soon they could expect the comments back. Staff replied as soon as the minutes could be done they would transmit the letter with general comments, and suggestions including the excerpts from the minutes. 16. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilbur and Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2004-008 to return the Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852 to L & L Environmental for completion, with revisions as stated above, for the Commission's review at a future meeting. Unanimously approved. C. Phase I A chaeolo ical Survey Report for Tentative Tract Map 31087 Applicant: Vahiti Partners Archaeologi I Consultant: L & L Environmental, Inc. Location: So h side of Darby Road, east of Washington Street 1. Principal anner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in a staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community De lopment Department. 2. Commissioner Shar commented this was a heavily developed area. 71. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Steve Speer, Assistant City Engin 6er DATE: July 23, 2004 RE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31852 EHLINE DEVELOPMENT The following changes to the abovementioned conditions are recommended by the Public Works Department. Amend PROPERTY RIGHTS, Condition 13(A) to read: A. Avenue 52 and Madison Street (Primary Arterial, Option A) - A minimum 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. Amend STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS, Condition 52(A)(2)(c) to read: c) 10-foot wide Multi -Use Trail. The applicant shall construct a meandering multi -use trail along the Madison Street frontage within the proposed landscaped setback. Additionally, the applicant's design for the at - grade street crossing of the multi -purpose trail shall incorporate use of surface(s) other than concrete and be approved by the Engineering Department. The location and design of the multi -purpose trail shall also be approved by the Engineering Department. The multi -use trail, trail signs, and the split rail fence shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior, to final map approval. 72 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 improvements, perimeter ndscaping on Darby Road and Lot "A", th/Association ttib in and all related appurtenances to include landscaping, access drives and sidewal The appe a Homeowners' Association or a Maintenfor such continuous and perpetual mainten ROLL CALL: AYE : Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. N S: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. STAIN: None. C. Environmental Assessment 2004-495 and Tentative Tract Map 31852; a request of Ehline Company for consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and the subdivision of 8.5 acres into 14 single-family lots for the property located at the northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 52. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Larry Ellison, representing the Ehline Company, stated they had no objections to the conditions as amended. 3. Chairman Kirk asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. John Gamlin, representing The Hideaway, stated his concerns about the street improvements for Avenue 52, screening requirements for the maintenance buildings, as well as the lighting. They would like to ensure they comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance. He also sees no reimbursement condition for the street improvements they have completed. Assistant City Engineer Steve Speer stated noted the process that would need to be followed to receive what was due them through the Developer Impact Fees. Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated that in regard to the landscaping lighting requirements, they will be reviewed during the plan check process in accordance with the conditions. The landscape plans will be brought back for approval. 73 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc -. r� Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 2004 4. There being no other public comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 5. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-056, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2003-495, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. 6. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Ladner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-057, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 31852, as amended: a. Condition #13.A.: Avenue 52 and Madison Street (primary Arterial, Option A) — A minimum 20 foot from the R/W-P/L b. Condition #52.A.2.c: 10-foot wide Multi -Use Trail. The applicant shall construct a meandering multi -use trail along the Madison Street frontage within the proposed landscaped setback. Additionally, the applicant's design for the at - grade street crossing of the multi -purpose trail shall incorporate use of surface(s) other than concrete and be approved by the Public Works Department. The location and design of the multi -purpose trail shall also be approved by the Public Works Department The multi -use trail, trail signs, and the split rail fence shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Daniels, Ladner, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Krieger and Quill. ABSTAIN: None. D. Street Name Change 2004-018; a request of ND La Quinta Partners for consideration of a street name change from Via Cc to Via Montecito and Via DD to Via Mallorca for streets within The Hideaway located on the east side of Jefferson Street, north of Avenue 54. 74 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\7-27-04.doc 1 j.