2006 06 20 CC Minutes
LA QUINT A CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2006
A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at the hour of
2:00 p.m. by Mayor Adolph.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Council Members Henderson, Kirk, Osborne, Sniff, Mayor Adolph
None
PUBLIC COMMENT
Myron and Joann Mintz, 80-355 Weiskopf, voiced opposition to KSL's plans to
develop on an open space area near their home, and indicated they don't feel
construction of a street on the reserved lot would be in the best interest of the
residents. They also inquired about the open space designation and process
required for a new project.
Mayor Adolph stated the City has not received correspondence from KSL regarding
this matter.
City Attorney Jenson stated she has received an inquiry from KSL's attorney as to
how Council's denial of the Ray Shaffer project might affect their application. She
explained each application is considered independently but that the road issue
would be difficult to resolve unless the road is eliminated. She advised the open
space area is reserved for KSL and their successors and not the residents. As for
new projects, public hearing notices would be sent to property owners within 500
feet of the subject property.
* * * * * * * * * * *
Joe Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, suggested the preliminary and final budgets be
placed at the library for public review, and staff reports put on the City web page
for public access. He also commented on the need for a full-time city attorney, and
stated he feels it would save money if more consultant positions were changed to
full-time employee positions.
CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Jenson did not participate in Item No.2.
City Council Minutes
2
June 20, 2006
1. Conference with labor negotiators, Ski Harrison, Michael O'Connor, and John
Ruiz, regarding negotiations with the La. Quinta City Employees Association
pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 .6 - Meet and Confer Process.
2. Conference with the City's real property negotiator, Michael O'Connor,
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning potential terms
and conditions of acquisition and/or disposition of real property located at
the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. Property
Owner/Negotiator: Chicago Title, Fred Parvy.
3. Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957, Council-appointed position - City Manager.
4. Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957, Council-appointed position - City Attorney.
Council recessed to the Redevelopment Agency and to Closed Session to and until
the hour of 3:00 p.m.
3:00 P.M.
Mayor Adolph led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chris Romero, 50-051 Balboa Street, Coachella, representing Retired Seniors
Volunteer Program (RSVP), presented an "honorary" check for $94,928
representing the number of volunteer hours provided at the Senior Center.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
City Manager Genovese requested Consent Item No. 17 be moved to Business Item
No.6.
Council Member Kirk requested Consent Item No. 14 be pulled for separate action.
Council Member Osborne requested Consent Item Nos. 5 and 6 be pulled for
separate action due to a potential conflict of interest.
City Council Minutes
3
June 20, 2006
ANNOUNCEMENTS - None
PRESENTATIONS - None
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Genovese advised both correspondence requests are included in the
preliminary budget to be considered on June 21, 2006.
1. CORRESPONDENCE FROM DENISE DUBARRY HAY, PRESIDENT OF PALM
SPRINGS WOMEN IN FILM AND TELEVISION, DATED MAY 31, 2006,
REGARDING CITY BUDGETING FUNDS FOR FINANCIAL INVOLVEMENT IN
FUTURE FILM INCENTIVES.
No comments.
2. CORRESPONDENCE FROM VICTORIA BAILEY, DESERT SPRINGS
PUBLISHING, DATED JUNE 9, 2006.
No comments.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Kirk to approve the City
Council Minutes of June 6, 2006, as amended (with an added notation that Council
Member Osborne did not participate in Closed Session Item No.2). Motion carried
unanimously.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JUNE 20, 2006.
2. RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT DATED APRIL 30, 2006.
3. RECEIVE AND FilE REVENUE & EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED APRIL 30,
2006.
4. APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR
CITY FACILITIES TO ADVANCED BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY.
City Council Minutes
4
June 20, 2006
5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLETION OF
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR PARCEL MAP
31116, CENTER POINTE, CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC. (See
separate action below.)
6. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLETION OF
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR PARCEL MAP
31116, CENTER POINTE, CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC. (See
separate action below.)
7. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLETION OF
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR PARCEL MAP
31816, WESTWARD SHADOWS, LA QUINTA NORTH PARTNERS, LP.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-056)
8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLETION OF
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR PARCEL MAP
31816, WESTWARD SHADOWS, LA QUINTA NORTH PARTNERS, LP.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-057)
9. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT WITH DAVIS REED CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO
MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SKATE PARK FENCE AT THE LA QUINTA
PARK, AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS FROM THE QUIMBY UNRESERVED FUND
BALANCE.
10. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO REAFFIRM THE CITY'S ADOPTION OF
THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR CSA 152, AUTHORIZING RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS, AND INDEMNIFY AND
HOLD THE COUNTY HARMLESS FOR LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON CITY
PARCELS UNDER CSA 152. (RESOLUTION NO. 2006-058)
11 . APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RASA FOR
ON-CALL MAP CHECK SERVICES.
12. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY TERRY SCHUBERT - DATE
OF LOSS: APRIL 17, 2006.
13. APPROVAL OF JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF
THE COACH ELLA VALLEY.
14. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
GREENPLA Y, LLC FOR THE PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN
UPDATE. (See separate action below.)
--------.-.-.--.- ._. --------- - ~
City Council Minutes
5
June 20, 2006
15. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR ONE MEMBER OF THE
CITY COUNCIL TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REVENUE
& TAX.ATION COMMITTEE MEETING TO BE HELD FRIDAY, JUNE 23, 2006,
IN SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.
16. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF A POOL
CHILLER UNIT FROM GLACIER POOL CHILLERS FOR THE FRITZ BURNS
PARK POOL. (RESOLUTION NO. 2006-059)
17. SEE BUSINESS ITEM NO.6.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve
the Consent Calendar as recommended and amended with the exception of
Item Nos. 5, 6,14, and 17; Item Nos. 7, 8,10, and 16 were approved by
RESOLUTION NOS. 2006-056 through 2006-059 respectively. Motion
carried unanimously.
Item Nos. 5 and 6:
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Kirk to approve the
following resolutions:
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINT A,
CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION
OF ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR PARCEL MAP
31116, CENTER POINTE, CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC.
and;
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINT A,
CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION
OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR PARCEL MAP
31116, CENTER POINTE, CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC.
Motion carried with Council Member Osborne ABSENT due to a potential
conflict of interest.
City Council Minutes
6
June 20, 2006
Item No. 14:
In response to Council Member Kirk, Community Services Director Hylton
stated the deadline for submitting proposals was extended, and staff is
comfortable with the number of proposals received.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Henderson to approve
Consent Item No. 14, approving a Professional Services Agreement with
Greenplay LLC for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update. Motion
carried unanimously.
BUSINESS SESSION
1 . CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE REGARDING THE LICENSING OF
TOBACCO RETAILERS.
Assistant City Manager O'Connor presented the staff report.
In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. O'Connor stated he doesn't know how
many retailers in the County would be affected if the ordinance is adopted
by all of the cities. He stated none of them have adopted it at this time, and
he understands the City of Indio has chosen not to take any action. He also
understands the tribal areas would be exempt from the ordinance.
Council Member Henderson asked if there has been any discussion as to how
this will work if all of the cities don't participate.
Mr. O'Connor stated it would be on a city-by-city basis but the funding
doesn't seem to work without a critical mass of support.
Council Member Henderson commented on the need to provide an increase
in the fee to cover annual budget increases.
VJ Sleight, 54-855 Avenida Diaz, indicated she collected 616 signatures in
support of the ordinance, and feels adoption of the ordinance is the most
important thing Council can do for the health of the community.. She
commented on a local IIstingll operation that shows there is a problem in the
City of cigarettes being sold to minors, and on the number of deaths caused
by cigarette smoking. She stated she recently witnessed a local store selling
cigarettes to a minor without any identification. She stated she feels it's
important for the City to send a message that it wants to protect the health
of young people.
City Council Minutes
7
June 20, 2006
Anita Roark, 74-140 EI Paseo, Palm Desert, Manager of Health Programs for
the American Cancer Society, spoke in support of controlling the availability
of tobacco to minors, and noted one out of every three cancer deaths is
related to tobacco use. She stated she believes licensing will help to reduce
the number of minors that smoke, and presented a letter of support from a
member of their Leadership Council.
Isaac Aguirre, 87-500 Goodman Road, Bermuda Dunes, stated he is 17 years
old, and participated in the "sting" operation conducted by the County
Health Department. He indicated 4 out of 10 stores in La Quinta sold him
tobacco products without asking for identification.
Aurora Kerr, representing CV AG, stated they revised the County ordinance
to include the cities, and the Executive Committee voted to send it to the
jurisdictions for consideration. In response to Council Member Kirk, she
stated there was one abstention on the Executive Committee vote but she
doesn't recall any opposition.
Council Member Henderson noted the Executive Committee action was not
in support of the ordinance but rather approval to send it out to the cities for
consideration.
Kelsey Sherman, 75-385 Painted Desert, Indian Wells, member of 4th District
Youth Advisory Council, voiced strong support for the ordinance. She has a
15-year old friend who buys cigarettes, and she feels anything that will help
the situation is necessary.
Martin Baxter, representing the County of Riverside Department of Public
Health, gave a brief presentation in support of the ordinance. He noted the
same number of people die every three days from smoking as those who
died in the 9/11 tragedy but it doesn't generate the same outrage. He
commented on existing government agencies and laws not being effective in
reducing the number of tobacco sales to minors.
In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. Baxter confirmed the funds spent on
education have been effective to a certain degree but they feel the next step
is to address the merchants and availability of tobacco. He explained the tax
received under Prop 10 is used for school readiness and child care.
Council Member Sniff stated he feels the proposal is filled with good
intentions but significantly impractical, and that enforcement is the key. He
commented on the importance of children learning from their parents about
the dangers of smoking, and that an increase in cost would help. He feels
the ordinance would create another level of government without significant
City Council Minutes
8
June 20, 2006
enforcement, and noted the Sheriff's Office already checks establishments
selling tobacco products.
Council Member Osborne stated he cares about young people but feels it's
inappropriate to compare this to the murders of 9/11. He voiced opposition
to adding another layer of government to do something that is already being
done, and that doesn't create any justifiable benefit.
Council Member Henderson noted there will be an initiative on the upcoming
ballot to increase the cost of cigarettes $2.62 a pack but none of it will be
used for enforcement. As a cigarette smoker, she has convinced her five
children not to smoke, and questions where minors get the money to buy
cigarettes. She stated maybe the City's Police Department should better
oversee enforcement of the regulations already in effect instead of creating a
new enforcement level. She questioned how the County intends to maintain
the new department at a current level as new costs arise. She stated she
would be willing to revisit this issue in the future if there is sufficient support
throughout the County but. can't support it at this time.
Council Member Kirk stated he had shared concerns about adding another
level of government until he read the background material on this issue. It's
his understanding the current regulations do not get to the heart of the
matter because they penalize the clerk who sells the cigarettes but fail to
reduce the incentive for the owner to stop selling to minors. He has
concerns about creating unnecessary bureaucracy but feels a better way is
needed to enforce the intent of the law, which is to keep minors from being
able to purchase cigarettes. He stated he feels it's appalling that a 17-year
old was able to purchase tobacco products in 4 out of 10 places in the City,
and likes the idea of store owners being penalized for violations and
potentially losing their license. He indicated he would support the ordinance
until he hears something better, and would support reviewing the City's
ordinances to address this issue.
Mayor Adolph also voiced concern about creating another level of'
bureaucracy, and the ability to enforce the ordinance. He asked what the
City's responsibilities are in following through with the State mandates on
this issue.
City Attorney Jenson advised the Penal Code makes selling of tobacco
products to minors a crime. She stated the State licensing penalties for
owners are: 1 st violation, a warning letter; 2nd violation, a $500 fine; 3rd
violation, a $1,000 fine; and 4th violation, a suspension period. Between the
4th and 7th violations the owner can be assessed a fine and a suspension of
up to 90 days, and an 8th violation calls for revocation of the license for a
City Council Minutes
9
June 20, 2006
24-month period. She noted the County ordinance allows for revocation at
the 1st violation but allows some leeway for settlements.
Mayor Adolph stated he feels the State ordinance should be stricter. He
questioned the County being able to handle this as well as the City because
of the size of the County. He would like to consider revising the City Code
to provide stricter control.
Council Member Henderson commented on the City of Temecula having an
effective ordinance, and suggested looking at it.
In response to Council Member Kirk, Ms. Jenson stated the State has
licensing regulations for tobacco sales but it doesn't prevent the County
from establishing their own regulations.
Council Member Kirk commented he didn't understand, from the
presentation, that a license is already required to sell tobacco products.
Council Member Sniff expressed support for finding out what other cities
have done, and what the City could maybe do.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to decline to
support the County's proposal for an ordinance regarding licensing of
tobacco retailers.
Council Member Kirk indicated he prefers staff come back with some
alternatives instead of rejecting the ordinance at this time.
Council Member Kirk offered a substitute motion to support, in concept, the
reduction of tobacco sales to underage persons and to direct staff to come
back with options for Council's consideration. The substitute motion failed
for lack of a second.
Council Member Henderson stated she believes the Council is in support of
doing something to help enforce a stronger regulation but not the creation of
a new bureaucratic layer of government.
Mayor Adolph stated he would support the motion as long as some type of
secondary motion is made for the City to consider revising its own
ordinances for better enforcement.
Motion carried with Council Member Kirk voting NO.
City Council Minutes
10
June 20, 2006
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to direct staff
to investigate possibilities, including contacting the City of Temecula, for
alternative solutions to address the issue of illegal tobacco sales to
teenagers.
Mayor Adolph noted it should include drafting a City ordinance to provide
control over retailers that sell tobacco products to minors.
Council Member Kirk asked if the CV AG approach would be included as one
of the alternatives.
Council Member Sniff indicated that it could be.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. CONSIDERATION OF USE OF CREDIT CARDS FOR ON-LINE REGISTRATION
PROGRAMS.
There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the
City Clerk's Office.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to approve
the use of credit cards for on-line recreation program registration. Motion
carried unanimously.
3. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60, SECTION
2.60.020 (DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES - DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES) OF THE
LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO "CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE."
There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the
City Clerk's Office.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to take up
Ordinance No. 427 by title and number only and waive further reading.
Motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 427
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINT A,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60, SECTION 2.60.020, RELATING
TO THE CITY OF LA QUINT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE.
City Council Minutes
11
June 20, 2006
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to introduce Ordinance No.
427 on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Council Members Henderson, Osborne, Perkins, Sniff,
Mayor Adolph
None
None
None
AYES:
4. CONSIDERATION OF DECLARING JULY 3, 2006, A CITY HOLIDAY.
There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the
City Clerk's Office.
MOTION -It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Kirk to approve a
modification to the 2006 holiday schedule to include July 3, 2006 as a paid
holiday. Motion carried unanimously.
5. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCIL MEMBER TO SERVE
ON THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CHILD SAFETY COMMISSION.
There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the
. City Clerk's Office.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Osborne/Sniff to appoint
Council Member Kirk to serve on the Riverside County Child Safety
Commission.
Council Member Kirk indicated it would be difficult for him to attend the
meetings if held in Riverside on a week day.
Mayor Adolph suggested the possibility of staff serving on the committee
instead of an elected.
Council Member Henderson stated she is in Riverside several times a month
attending other meetings, and is willing to serve on the committee if she can
coordinate the meeting schedule with her other meetings. Otherwise, she
will come back to Council to consider other options.
City Council Minutes
12
June 20, 2006
AMENDED MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Osborne/Sniff to
appoint Council Member Henderson to serve on the Riverside County Child
Safety Commission and to appoint Council Member Kirk as the alternate.
Motion carried unanimously.
6. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE
INVESTMENT POLICY OF THE CITY OF LA QUINT A FOR FISCAL YEAR
2006/2007.
Finance Director Falconer presented the staff report.
Council Member Osborne asked if the Board had discussed adding "potential
gain" as an exception under Liquidity on Page 9.
Mr. Falconer stated the City has a "buy-and-hold" policy, and the Board feels
it should stay in effect. He noted, currently, the City's portfolio doesn't
have any gains because of rising interest rates.
Council Member Osborne stated he recently discussed his concerns about
the low rate of return with the Board, and appreciated the information they
provided. He indicated he supports, on a limited scale, the Board's proposal
to use $10 million of the City's cash investments with an investment
manager, who would not possess the funds but rather guide the investments
according to the City's current investment strategy. He would like Council
to consider directing staff to hire a professional investment advisor for a 12-
month period to invest $10 million, and see how it affects the rate of return.
He noted the increase could amount to $200,000.
Council Member Sniff stated it seems like a reasonable proposal.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Falconer stated he surveyed
the rate of returns for the County and Cities of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage,
and Indian Wells, and La Quinta's portfolio was higher except for the City of
Palm Desert, which was the same. He pointed out all of the cities in '
California have lower investments because of Federal increases in the
interest rates. He indicated the yield in the City's portfolio is 4 to 4 % %.
In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. Falconer stated the other cities don't use a
professional investment advisor but do have a more liberal investment policy.
He added the City is able to exceed the other cities' yields through short-
term investments.
City Council Minutes
13
June 20, 2006
Council Member Henderson asked if there is a funding level that makes it
more acceptable to hire a money manager, and who he/she would answer
to.
Mr. Falconer stated it depends on whatever the treasurer is comfortable
with.
Regarding who the money manager would answer to, City Attorney Jenson
advised the State Code authorizes Council to delegate the authority to the
city treasurer or to retain it themselves. She stated there is a State Attorney
General opinion that allows a city treasurer to hire a portfolio manager, as
long as the treasurer makes the selection, creates safeguards, and remains
responsible for the decisions. She suggests if Council wishes to delegate
some of the authority to a portfolio manager, that the ordinance be amended
to change the delegation of responsibility to the Council because the
treasurer would have no control to dictate the individual investment
decisions.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Falconer stated the
investment chart on Page 38 differentiates between the allowable
investments a treasurer and a professional money manager can make. He
confirmed the money manager would have four investment opportunities the
treasurer does not have. He advised the City's investment policy limitations
are more restrictive than the State's but the money manager would be
subject to the State limitations.
Council Member Henderson asked about gIVing the additional investment
opportunities to the treasurer instead of hiring a money manager.
Mr. Falconer stated the Board has not wanted to go in that direction. He
anticipates the work plan being discussed at their next meeting, and a formal
vote taken regarding a money manager. He added the work plan will come
before Council at the second meeting in July.
In response to Council Member Kirk, Ms. Jenson stated it's her
understanding the Board does not want the money manager to advise the
treasurer and the treasurer take the action.
Mr. Falconer explained the difference between an investment advisor and
portfolio manager. A portfolio manager has sole discretion in investing the
$10 million and an investment advisor advises the treasurer, who then
executes the trades.
City Council Minutes
14
June 20, 2006
Council Member Osborne stated he is suggesting use of a portfolio manager
who would have some control on the investments within the investment
policy.
In response to Council Member Kirk, Ms. Jenson confirmed the current
ordinance delegates authority to the treasurer, and would need to be revised
to clarify responsibility.
Council Member Osborne suggested the portfolio manager issue be brought
back for consideration.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Falconer confirmed the
investment limitations in the chart are set by the Board.
Council Member Osborne suggested making the investment opportunities in
the chart the same.
Council Member Kirk indicated he is in favor of giving a portfolio manager as
many tools as possible to do the job.
Mr. Falconer stated he anticipates the Board recommending an ordinance
amendment and RFP for a professional portfolio manager in July.
Council Member Sniff suggested increasing the treasurer's tools instead of
hiring a portfolio manager, and considering a portfolio manager later on if
needed.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Falconer stated the Board
anticipates short-term rates staying around 5% over the next year, and 30-
year rates at about 5.20%.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-062
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINT A,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE AMENDED INVESTMENT
POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to adopt Resolution No.
2006-062 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
'%'.
City Council Minutes
15
June 20, 2006
STUDY SESSION
1. DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF THE DRAFT VILLAGE PARKING STUDY.
Community Development Director Evans introduced Matt Inman, of Carl
Walker, Inc., who gave a brief presentation on the Village Parking Study,
including short-term, mid-term, and long-term recommendations.
In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. Inman stated there are spots around the
Village that are busier than others but the overall usage at this time is about
41%.
In response to Council Member Osborne, Mr. Evans confirmed there are
development agreement projects that will pay into a parking fund when they
start construction.
Council Member Henderson noted the City eliminated a previous parking fee
to encourage development in the Village.
Council Member Sniff suggested some thought be given to developing a tram
system.
In response to Council Member Kirk, Mr. Evans stated staff believes private
property owners should participate in parking as their land is developed. The
current parking fee is $12,000 per space but the consultant believes the
cost is closer to $20,000 per space. He indicated the parking study should
be valid for a period of time, and staff hopes to come back in the fall with
recommendations for the first series of actions.
Council Member Kirk commented he feels a tram system would be a waste
of time and money.
Council recessed to the Redevelopment Agency meeting.
Council reconvened and recessed to and until 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENT - None
City Council Minutes
16
June 20, 2006
PRESENTATIONS - None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONFIRM THE PRE-ANNEXATION ZONING FOR TEN
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF DARBY ROAD.
Mayor Adolph noted this public hearing has been cancelled. No action was
taken.
2. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO CONSIDER AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SCHDC) TO
CONVEY CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 78-990 MILES AVENUE AND
SCHDC's SUBSEQUENT OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF AN
AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 80
DWELLING UNITS RESTRICTED FOR RENTAL TO AND OCCUPANCY BY,
VERY LOW-INCOME FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS AT A RENT AFFORDABLE TO
SUCH HOUSEHOLDS.
The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 7:03 p.m.
Mayor Adolph stated there has been a request to continue this item to July
18, 2006.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to continue
the public hearing for an affordable housing agreement with Southern
California Housing Development Corporation to July 18, 2006. Motion
carried unanimously.
Council recessed to the Redevelopment Agency meeting.
Council reconvened.
REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
League of California Cities - Council Member Henderson indicated she is willing to
be the voting delegate but may not be able to attend the general assembly meeting
on Saturday.
City Council Minutes
17
June 20, 2006
Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention & Visitor's Authority - Council Member
Henderson encouraged everyone to attend the various summer mixers put on by
CVA.
San Jacinto/Santa Rosa National Monument Advisory Committee - Council
Member Henderson reported an item will be coming forward to Council to approve
her reappointment.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
All other reports were noted and filed.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
City Attorney Jenson reported a CEQA action has been filed on the Multi-Species
Habitat Conservation Plan, and the defense will be tendered to CVAG.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS
1 . DISCUSSION REGARDING LENGTH AND EFFICIENCY OF CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS.
Council Member Kirk stated he believes lengthy Council meetings discourage
public participation, and are costly because of staff hours required. He also
feels it difficult for Council to make good decisions at a late hour. He
proposed he and Mayor Adolph meet with the City Manager to discuss ways
other cities are addressing the same concern, and come back to Council with
options for consideration. He commented on the importance of the media
being able to report Council actions the following day.
Joe Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, spoke in support of shortening the length
of the Council meetings, and made the following suggestions: place a time
limit on each Council Members' comments; put more items on the consent
calendar; specify a certain time on the agenda for items expected to
generate a lot of public response; set a time limit for each item on the
agenda; limit discussions about other committee meetings; change to weekly
meetings to start at 7:00 p.m.; and allow more time between the Planning
Commission and City Council meetings for public hearing items to provide
more time for staff to prepare staff reports.
City Council Minutes
18
June 20, 2006
Council Member Henderson spoke in support of Council Member Kirk and
Mayor Adolph meeting with the City Manager to discuss options and to bring
them back to the Council for consideration. She indicated she has suggested
the Council meet every Tuesday during June because of the budget hearing
and commission interviews.
Council Member Sniff questioned being able to set a time limit on Council
meetings and still be able to have proper discussion, presentation, and
debate. He is in favor of the meetings going faster but will not support
arbitrarily limiting the time limit. He doesn't have a problem trying to place
items earlier on the agenda that are expected to take a significant amount of
time or arouse significant public interest. He stated he will support logical
and functional ways to speed things up.
Council concurred with Council Member Kirk and Mayor Adolph meeting with
the City Manager and coming back to Council with options for consideration.
2. DISCUSSION REGARDING CODE ENFORCEMENT ON COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY.
Council Member Osborne spoke regarding the need for adequa~e code
compliance in retail and commercial areas to promote pedestrian traffic for
shopping.
Council Member Sniff suggested a dedicated code enforcement position for
commercial areas, especially in high-graffiti areas.
In response to Council Member Osborne, Building & Safety Director Hartung
stated code compliance regulations for commercial are more detailed than
residential because of specific plans and conditions of approval. He stated
the Senior Code Compliance Officer currently handles 95 % of commercial
code enforcement issues, and two new Code Compliance Officer positions
are proposed in the preliminary budget.
3. DISCUSSION REGARDING ADA REQUIRMENTS FOR ACCESS PASSENGER
DROP OFF AND LOADING ZONES.
Council Member Henderson requested this item and Item No. 4 come back
as study session items. '
Council concurred.
City Council Minutes
19
June 20, 2006
4. DISCUSSION REGARDING REGULATIONS ON TEMPORARY STRUCTURES.
See comment under Item No.3.
5. DISCUSSION REGARDING COYOTE CONTROL/CODE ENFORCEMENT.
Mayor Adolph advised of a resident's desire for the City to trap coyotes at
PGA West, and asked about the City's ability to trap animals on private
property.
Building & Safety Director Hartung confirmed the City has provided traps to
residents to trap wild/stray dogs. Staff checked the traps, and delivered the
dogs to the animal shelter. In the case of coyotes, staff would not be able
to set traps unless a finding is made that the coyotes are a threat, and the
trapped coyotes would then have to be killed. He noted coyotes can be shot
as varmints as long as the trapper has a license to discharge a weapon
within City limits. He indicated staff can ask Fish & Game to provide the
PGA West residents some guidelines to help them understand how best to
deal with the intrusion of coyotes into populated areas.
Council Member Henderson suggested staff follow it up with a story in The
Gem to educate people on the challenges related to coyotes.
The City Council recessed to Closed Session as delineated on Page 1.
The City Council meeting was reconvened with no decisions being made in Closed
Session which require reporting pursuant to Section 54957.1 of the Government
Code (Brown Act).
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
~-0~
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California