2006 09 05 CC Minutes
LA QUINT A CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 5, 2006
A regular meeting of the La Guinta City Council was called to order at the hour of
2:00' p.m. by Mayor Adolph.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Council Members Henderson, Kirk, Osborne, Sniff, Mayor Adolph
None
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joe Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, questioned the appropriateness of Consent Item
No. 20 being on the Consent Calendar, and suggested it be moved to the Business
Session then continued for two weeks to give the public more opportunity to
review the staff report.
CLOSED SESSION
1. Conference with City's real property negotiator, Douglas R. Evans, pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning potential terms and
conditions of acquisition and/or disposition of real property located
southwest of the intersection of Highway 111 and La Quinta Centre Drive.
Property Owner/Negotiator: Stamko Development Co., Chris Clarke.
2. Conference with City's legal counsel regarding pending litigation, KSL Land
Corporation v. City of La Quinta, et ai, Riverside Superior Court Case No.
INC060133, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a}.
Council recessed to the Redevelopment Agency and to Closed Session to and until
the hour of 3:00 p.m.
3:00 P.M.
Mayor Adolph led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
City Council Minutes
2
September 5, 2006
PUBLIC COMMENT
Scott Arthur, 43-845 Milan Court, commented on the removal of the "No Left
Turn" sign on Palm Royale and the replacement with a temporary sign indicating
"AII Traffic Must Turn Right." He feels left turns should be allowed at Fred Waring
until the new traffic signal is installed because traffic is cutting through his
neighborhood. He added he thought the new signal was supposed to be installed
before the school opened. He also voiced safety concerns about the traffic flow.
Public Works Director Jonasson stated he was not aware of the new sign, which
may have been placed there by the school. As for the traffic signal, he advised it is
not yet funded. DIF fees will cover 50% of the cost but the remaining amount will
be the responsibility of future developments adjacent to Fred Waring.
In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. Jonasson stated staff would like an opportunity
to observe traffic at the intersection after school has been open for a while to
determine if a traffic signal is warranted sooner than anticipated.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
Council Member Osborne requested Consent Item Nos. 6 and 20 be moved to
Business Item Nos. 6 and 7, and that Consent Item No. 7 be taken up separately
due to a potential conflict of interest.
Council Member Kirk requested Consent Item No. 25 be moved to Business Item
No.8, and that Consent Item No. 28 be taken up separately due to a conflict of
interest.
Ar~NOUNCEMENTS - None
PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Adolph presented the Finance Director and Finance Department a Certificate
of Achievem~nt for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government
Financial Officers Association.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1. CORRESPONDENCE FROM SHELDON BRODSKY DATED AUGUST 8, 2006.
City Council Minutes
3
September 5, 2006
Sheldon Brodsky stated he is.. proposing the City pay him a fee to come up
with some entertainment programs to be held at the Senior Center. He wants
to schedule a total of 10 programs to be held every three weeks beginning in
November.
Council Member Henderson commented on it not being budgeted, and
explained the RFP process for hiring consultants.
Council Member Kirk suggested it be a part of the needs assessment being
conducted by the Community Services Department.
Community Services Director Hylton stated she anticipates the needs
assessment survey being distributed in September with compilation
completed after the first of the year.
Council concurred to refer this matter to the Community Services
Department to be considered as part of the needs assessment.
2. CORRESPONDENCE FROM POLO AMERICA REGARDING POLO & BALLOON
FEST IV AL.
Council Member Sniff suggested referring this to staff for more-definitive
information.
Council Member Henderson noted such items should be submitted prior to
approval of the budget, and suggested the possibility of handling it through
the Community Services Grant Program.
Community Services Director Hylton advised grant applications are scheduled
to be considered again in February.
In response to Council Member Osborne, Management Analyst Casillas
stated marketing requests outside of the marketing budget are not usually
reviewed by the marketing committee. She referenced the potential of using
marketing contingency funds.
Council concurred to refer this matter to the marketing committee for a
recommendation and more-definitive information.
City Council Minutes
4
September 5, 2006
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve the City
Council Minutes of August 2, 2006, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 . APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTERS DATED AUGUST 15 AND SEPTEMBER
5, 2006.
2. . APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO UTILIZE
THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR A CANDIDATE'S FORUM ON OCTOBER 11,
2006, 7:00 P.M. TO 9:00 P.M.
3. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS &
ASSOCIATES FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES.
4. ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR SECONDARY GATEWAY
TREATMENT PURPOSES FROM LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,',A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ASSOCIATED WITH THE ESPLANADE
DEVELOPMENT, TRACT MAP 29323-1.
5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A
FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT
MAP 32068, THE CITRUS, POMELO PACIFIC, LLC. (RESOLUTION NO.
2006-094)
6. SEE BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.6.
.. ':" .7 . APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY OF LA QUINT A FOR
'THE_ HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS AT THE
LA QUINT A CORPORATE YARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. (See separate action below.)
'8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION
. OF THE ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR
TRACT MAP 31874-2, CARMELA, TAYLOR-WOODROW HOMES, INC.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-095)
City Council Minutes
5
September 5, 2006
9. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION;TO~EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION
OF THE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR
TRACT MAP 31874-2, CARMELA, TAYLOR-WOODROW HOMES, INC.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-096)
10. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION
OF THE ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR
TRACT MAP 31874-1, CARMELA, TAYLOR-WOODROW HOMES, INC.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-097)
11 . ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION
OF THE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOR
TRACT MAP 31874-1, CARMELA, TAYLOR-WOODROW HOMES, INC.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-098)
12. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP
AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT MAP NO.
31249, THE VILLAGE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN, ADOBE HOLDINGS, INC.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-099)
13. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY TIME WARNER CABLE: DATE
OF LOSS - JANUARY 17, 2006.
14. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY ALFONSO PENA: DATE OF
LOSS - JANUARY 17,2006.
15. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY MARTHA HERNANDEZ: DATE
OF LOSS - JANUARY 17, 2006.
16. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY TRACEY ESSARY: DATE OF
LOSS - MAY 25,2006.
17. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY VERIZON: DATE OF LOSS -'
JUNE 9, 2005.
18. APPROVAL OF ADVERTISEMENT IN 2007 CALIFORNIA VISITOR'S GUIDE.
19. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH
AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a} FOR THE SilverRock RESORT ON-
SITE AND OFF-SITE NATIVE AND PERIMETER AREA ENHANCEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 2002-07 0 AND CONSENTING TO THE EXPENDITURES.
(RESOLUTION NO. 2006-100)
20. SEE BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.7.
City Council Minutes
6
September 5, 2006
21. APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO DBX, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF
$263,644.00, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE AVENUE 47 AT ADAMS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2005-04.
22. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO OBTAIN PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE JEFFERSON STREET MEDIAN ISLAND
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2005-03.
23. APPROVAL OF POSITION DESCRIPTION FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES
COORDINATOR AND AMENDMENT OF THE POSITION SCHEDULE.
24. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY
SAFETY MANAGER AND CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER II TO ATTEND THE
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS 2006
ANNUAL SEMINAR IN MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA, OCTOBER 4.6, 2006.
25. SEE BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.8.
26. APPROVAL OF A FINANCING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
LA QUINT A AND THE LA QUINT A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FO~ THE
WASHINGTON STREET LAND ACQUISITIONS.
27. APPROVAL OF AN OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY VIOLENT GANG TASK FORCE.
28. APPROVAL OF A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH T.D. DESERT
DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR RAISED LANDSCAPE MEDIAN
IMPROVEMENTS ON AVENUE 50 AND APPROPRIATION OF
INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS. (See separate action below.)
29. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF
TUE. COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COMMISSION CHANGING THE
LIST OF SIGNATORIES FOR THE COACH ELLA VALLEY MULTI-SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN
THE AMENDMENT.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Kirk to approve the
Consent Calendar as recommended and amended with the exception of Item
Nos. 6, 7, 20, 25, and 28 and with Item Nos. 5, 8-12, and 19 being
approved by RESOLUTION NOS. 2006-094 through 2006-100 respectively.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes
7
September 5, 2006
Item No.7:
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to approve
Consent Item No.7, approving an agreement between the City of La Quinta
and the County of Riverside Waste Management Department to permit
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs at the La Guinta Corporate
Yard, and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. Motion carried
with Council Member Osborne ABSTAINING due to a potential conflict of
interest.
Item No. 28:
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to approve
Consent Item No. 28, authorizing the City Manager to execute a
Reimbursement Agreement between the City of La Guinta and T.D. Desert
Development Limited Partnership, a Delaware Limited Partnership, for raised
landscape median improvements to Avenue 50, and appropriate funding from
the Infrastructure Fund in the amount of $52,100. Motion carried with
Council Member Kirk ABSTAINING due to a potential conflict of interest.
BUSINESS SESSION
1 . CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT WITH
REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE CITY'S REDLlGHT CAMERA
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM, PROJECT NO. 2004-06.
Public Works Director Jonasson presented the staff report.
City Attorney Jenson referenced a possible typographical error on Page 26
regarding "automated" being eliminated prior to "red light citation." She
advised the seven-year contract proposed by Redflex can be terminated with
a 30-day notice but the City would still be responsible for any ongoing deficit
that occurs if the citation income is insufficient to cover the contractor's
monthly fee. If a deficit exists at termination or expiration of the contract,
any monies received from an automated red light program over for the next
twelve months would be used to pay the deficit, which could restrict the
City from changing operators. She noted the, contractor is allowed to cancel
the contract if the revenue they receive from the program is less than 50%
of thei~ monthly fees for more than six months. An additional concern is the
need for the court fees to be broken out separately, which she believes can
be done. She recommends having an MOU with CalTrans to make sure the
timing of the traffic signals is consistent with the timing requirements set
City Council Minutes
8
September 5, 2006
forth in the State Vehicle Code until such time as CalTrans relinquishes
control of Highway 111 in La Quinta.
In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. Jonasson stated he anticipates the
relinquishment will take six months to a year to complete.
Council Member Sniff suggested this item be tabled until the timing is more
appropriate.
Mayor Adolph commented on timing problems with the traffic signals. Mr.
Jonasson advised the City is still abiding by the CalTrans timing
requirements. Contract Traffic Engineer Nazir Lalani indicated he has not
been able to convince CalTrans to change the current timing.
Aaron Rosenberg, representing Redflex, explained the ongoing deficit would
be only for photo-enforced citations issued during their contract but not yet
processed, and that a deficit typically exists only in the first year of
operation. They are willing to revise the language to address any concern
about changing vendors. He indicated they changed the beta test period to
help recoup the costs of installation and to provide reliable results
demonstrating that the program works. As for recouping the unamortized
cost, it's only required should a City terminate the contract for convenience,
or they can't show the program works effectively and there's insufficient
time to recoup the costs. He stated they are willing to discuss the
provisions.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Jonasson confirmed this
would be a 36-month beta program.
Council Member Henderson agreed one year is not long enough to do an
analysis but asked why not a two-year program. Mr. Rosenberg indicated a
willingness to discuss it but three years is already shorter than their other
contracts.
Ms. Jenson clarified the importance of the beta test period is the
amortization over a seven-year period. Mr. Rosenberg indicated they could
adjust the amortization schedule.
Council Member Kirk commented on the number of accidents at that
intersection and the cost to the City and residents. He voiced concern about
the economic impacts, and stated he would like to move forward with the
contract in some form. He feels the alternative of putting officers at that
intersection is too dangerous.
City Council Minutes
9
September 5, 2006
In response to Mayor Adolph, Police Chief Meyer advised that in 2005,
approximately 30% of the accidents at that intersection were due to drivers
running red lights. The other 70% were attributed to improper turning
movements, following too close, and unsafe speed. He referenced Highway
111 and Washington Street being the busiest intersection in the Valley. He
advised the camera program would require a significant number of manpower
hours to review and process the citations, and he feels the revenue stream
from citations is "iffy" at best. He recommended the item be tabled and
traffic engineers be given an opportunity to fix the problem.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Chief Meyer stated he feels
everyone agrees there is a problem with the sequencing of the traffic signal
lights, and if changing the timing doesn't work, this can come back to
consider as an enforcement issue. He noted the effectiveness of the camera
program would be reflected in the reduced number of citations and revenue
stream to pay for the monthly fee. Although it's a valuable program if an
intersection is identified as a redlight running problem, he isn't convinced it is
at this intersection. He also questioned the wisdom of using the cameras for
only two directions instead of all four.
Council Member Henderson commented that she has been supportive of the
program but is now disappointed. She feels the cost would be inappropriate
until the issues related to the timing of the left-turn signal are fixed. She
noted the monthly fee to implement the program for this intersection is
$12,000, and the amount generated from citations throughout the City is
only $11,000. She supports the program being left on the table for future
consideration, and continued efforts made to get CalTrans to change the
timing.
Council Member Osborne stated he is also disappointed, and agrees with
tabling the matter for now.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to table
consideration of an agreement with Redflex Traffic Systems for Redlight .
Camera Enforcement Program, Project No. 2004-06. Motion carried
unanimously.
2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN
OF THE LIBRARY BUS STOP.
Community Services Director Hylton presented the staff report.
Council Member Sniff suggested changing the design to a scholarly owl with
books.
City Council Minutes
10
September 5, 2006
In response to Council Member Kirk, Ms. Hylton confirmed both designs
meet Sun Line's requirements, and indicated Sun Line w,i11 be using this
agreement as an example for other cities.
Mayor Adolph commented on the need for the shelters to provide afternoon
shade, and voiced theft and vandalism concerns.
William Ware explained hoVV bolts would be used to avoid theft and
vandalism problems.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Ware confirmed he discussed
an idea proposed by one of the residents but it was not feasible with this
budget.
Council Member Henderson spoke in support of Mr. Ware's design, and
indicated she doesn't have a problem with using either the raven or owl for
the artwork.
Council Member Kirk stated he likes Mr. Ware's proposal, and agrees with
changing the raven to an owl.
Kay Henkel reviewed alternatives and color options for her design, and
explained the design would utilize the existing roof.
Council Member Osborne stated he feels Ms. Henkel's design IS more
representative of the library.
Council Member Sniff spoke in support of using Mr. Ware's design with an
owl.
Mayor Adolph stated he likes both designs but feels Mr. Ware's design
would provide more shade, and suggested adding something on the east side
to represent the library.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Henderson to approve an
Art Purchase Agreement in the amount of $79,555 with William Ware for
the design of the library bus stop, replacing the raven with an owl and
requesting the artist to consider iconic images representing a library.
Mayor Adolph stated Council will leave it up to the artist to come up with
something visual on the east side of the shelter.
Motion carried with Council Member Osborne voting NO.
City Council Minutes
11
September 5, 2006
Council concurred to take up Item No.4 at this time.
4. CONSIDERATION OF A CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE AND UPDATE ON
THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE.
Community Development Director Evans presented the staff report.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Evans advised the comments
from the County on two tract map applications indicate they do not like the
design. They are requesting a reduction in the density and wider buffers,
which currently range from 80-150 feet as proposed by the developer. The
County is currently waiting for adoption of the Task Force's
recommendations on their existing general plan but until then they are using
what currently exists to guide their comments, and are recommending one
dwelling unit per acre.
Council Member Kirk stated he believes the current zoning for that area is
one dwelling unit per five acres.
Council Member Henderson pointed out that the Vista Santa Rosa (VSR)
Community Plan Concept attached to the staff report is only a draft and
subject to change.
In response to Council Member Kirk, Mr. Evans advised the City's comments
on the MOU have been forwarded to the County but the County is still
waiting for the other cities' comments. He noted staff has suggested a
provision be added in the agreements for unique features for each city. He
stated he anticipates the MOU being in place before the end of the year. He
confirmed the Task Force has been empowered to provide recommendations
to the County, and that there are elements of what the County is doing that
may be a duplicate of the City's strategic planning process.
In response to Council Member Osborne, Mr. Evans stated it's his
understanding that the Task Force meetings are open to the public but that
only Task Force members and County and City staff have attended.
Council Members Henderson and Kirk both commented that they have been
told people were kept out of the meetings.
In response to Council Member Osborne, Mr. Evans stated if the Council
would like to be involved in the Task Force meetings, it's staff's
recommendation that a Council Member be appointed to attend the meeting
when the County's summary recommendations on the concept map are
City Council Minutes
12
September 5, 2006
presented. He feels Council presence at all of the meetings would change
the dynamics of the group.
Council Member Osborne inquired about the County's medium-density
residential zoning designation, and stated he wants to be sure of what the
designations represent.
Mr. Evans stated he doesn't believe the Task Force members fully
understand the designations, and that the concept is the first cut at trying to
meet some of the existing visions.
Council Member Sniff stated he feels the issue of primary importance is
participation on a subcommittee. He is not convinced Council representation
on the Task Force is a bad thing, and feels it would provide an opportunity to
have some influence and provide input upfront as to what the Council thinks
regarding development in the area. He feels the Council should be involved
in a meaningful way as soon as possible in order to influence, if not
significantly direct, this process.
Mayor Adolph stated he agrees with the need for Council involvement with
the process. He referenced the County's comments on parkway landscaping
in lieu of landscaped medians, and stated he is not supportive of putting in
rural roads to have wider parkways. He feels it's important to design for the
future, and that it would be a major problem if the area is not designed with
wider streets with medians. He believes both are important.
Council Member Henderson commented that she is not comfortable having
two Council Members provide significant input at the Task Force meetings
on what the Council thinks because the Council has yet to make decisions
on these issues. She doesn't have a problem sending a Council Member to
attend the Task Force meeting when the County presentation is made but
otherwise feels it's better for the current group, consisting of farmers,
landowners, developers, and VSR residents, to continue meeting with a staff
person present. She feels Council should start addressing these issues in
order to give direction to the new strategic planner that will soon be hired.
Council Member Kirk commented that he feels County Supervisor Wilson
must not be concerned about changing the dynamics of the Task Force
because it was his suggestion to add the two Council Members. He feels
there is value in having one or two Council Members attend the Task Force
meetings but is more concerned about having subcommittee participation in
the MOU negotiations and the strategic work plan. He voiced concern about
duplicated efforts related to the County and City work plans, and stated he
City Council Minutes
13
September 5, 2006
would like to see the Councilor a subcommittee involved in more of the
week-to-week decisions related to annexation.
Council Member Osborne stated his main focus is that Council is kept
informed of the Task Force issues. He agrees with creating a subcommittee
and having one or two Council Members on the Task Force.
Council Member Sniff recommended a study session be held at an early date
to come up with a consensus as to what the Council wants and how to
accomplish it. He stated he supports Option 2'0
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to: 1) go with
Option 2 and appoint Council Member Osborne to attend, along with the
Community Development Director, appropriate meetings of the Vista Santa
Rosa Task Force, and report back to the City Council, and 2) direct staff to
schedule a study session at an early date to begin internal discussions as to
what direction Council wants to take regardil)g the sphere of influence
issues.
City Manager Genovese noted Option 2 includes appointing a subcommittee
as referenced in Option 1.
Council Member Osborne suggested Council Member Kirk be appointed to
the subcommittee to work with staff, and he would serve as the
subcommittee representative to attend the Task Force meeting.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Evans confirmed the
subcommittee would be working on the strategic plan, MOU, etc. and
attending the Task Force meeting.
Council Member Kirk suggested the subcommittee work with staff to help
set the agenda for the study session.
Mr. Genovese stated he understands the motion includes appointing Council
Members Kirk and Osborne to serve on a subcommittee to work on the work
plan and MOU, and directing Council Member Osborne to attend the Task
Force meetings.
For clarification, the motion is restated as follows to include both Option 1
and 2:
City Council Minutes
14
September 5, 2006
RESTATED MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Osborne to:
1) appoint Council Members Kirk and Osborne to serve on a Council
Subcommittee to work directly with the City Manager on the City work
program and assist in reviewing the Vista Santa Rosa Task Force programs
and recommendations with the subcommittee efforts to be completed by
December 31, 2006, and the Community Development Director participating
in the Task Force; 2) assign Council Member Osborne to attend the Task
Force meetings when the County Planning staff presents their summary
recommendations; and 3) direct staff and the subcommittee to bring this
issue back in a study session at an early date to begin internal discussions as
to what direction Council wants to take regarding the sphere of influence
issues. Motion carried unanimously.
Council concurred to take up Item No.7 at this time.
7 . CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT TO SHARE
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE WITH VILLAGE RESORT, LLC, A
SUBSIDIARY OF CHICAGO TITLE, FOR THE EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL
LOCATED AT 50-777 SANTA ROSA PLAZA.
(This item was moved from Consent Item No. 20.)
City Attorney Jenson advised she would not be participating in this item due
to her office doing work for Chicago Title, and that special counsel Jim
Vaughn, of Zeilinga, Stowell, and Vaughn, is present to answer legal
questions.
Assistant City Manager O'Connor presented the staff report.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. O'Connor confirmed the
casitas portion of the project is not part of this agreement.
Mayor Adolph stated he has heard the hotel planned to open in January but
would open earlier if they received financial assistance from the City. He
commented he has a problem giving them money because he doesn't feel
they need it to get the hotel open.
Joe Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, expressed appreciation for this item being
moved to the business session but noted he also requested the item be
continued for two meetings to give the public an opportunity to review the
staff report. He asked how much has been spent on legal fees on this
matter and how much time has been spent, who provided legal counsel
during the closed sessions, and who was present on behalf of Chicago Title
City Council Minutes
15
September 5, 2006
and the Embassy Suites. He indicated if Hilton or the Embassy Suites is the
operator, he believes they will open at the earliest possible date because of
their investment. He asked how many hours have been spent in closed
session without any reporting to the public on this matter, and why the
Council wants to give them money. He commented about negotiations with
the prior developer being for a loan and not a gift of a million dollars as
currently proposed. He feels La Guinta has always been somewhat of a
"company" town; first with the La Guinta Hotel then KSL and now Hilton
Hotels. He believes the money could be used to pay other expenses in the
City.
Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, commented on the item being placed on
the Consent Calendar, and the number of times it has been in closed session
without public input. She questioned why Council would now consider a
million dollar agreement when they didn't see the need before. She doesn't
feel a symbolic gesture is necessary, and recommends the Council wish
them well, and tell them they don't need the City's money.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Osborne/Henderson to
approve an Agreement to share Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue
.with Village Resort, LLC, a subsidiary of Chicago Title ("Village Resort") for
the Embassy Suites Hotel ("Hotel") located at 50-777 Santa Rosa Plaza.
Council Member Henderson commented that there has been a lot of
frustration expressed during the closed sessions, and noted nothing was
reported because no action was taken. She noted the City has assisted
other entities with tax sharing in order to improve amenities in the
community, and stated she feels the opening of the hotel is important to the
Village. She agreed it would probably open without this agreement. She
stated the rebate is an economic development tool that is based on revenue
to be generated by the hotel, and it provides a certain amount of se~urity
that the hotel will open. As for negotiations with the previous developer,
she stated they were complicated. The Council realized he needed help, and
it was not a matter of saying "No" to him and "Yes" to a major corporation.
She feels the Council has tried their best to get the facility open, and she
supports this as a positive step forward.
Council Member Kirk stated he supports the motion. Although it's
somewhat distasteful for the City to subsidize any business, he feels the
hotel is important to the Village. He feels this agreement is better than
previous deals, and an improvement over Chicago Title's initial request for
$3.5 million. He inquired about the posting of the agenda and availability of
staff reports.
City Council Minutes
16
September 5, 2006
City Manager Genovese advised the staff report was available late Friday
after being released to the City Council.
Council Member Kirk commented on holiday weekends making it somewhat
problematic to make staff reports available, and the possibility of posting
them on the City's website. He stated he is supportive of getting the hotel
open quickly.
Council Member Sniff noted the rebate amount has been significantly
reduced, and that the hotel must operate under certain conditions for a
consistent period of time to receive it. He commented on the benefits of the
hotel, and stated he supports the current proposal.
Mayor Adolph stated he doesn't believe the rebate is an incentive to get the
hotel because it's already here. He stated he felt the previous developer
needed help to get the hotel open but believes Chicago Title will open the
hotel with or without the City's help. He stated he cannot support the City
providing financial assistance when it's not needed.
Council Member Osborne referenced a memorandum with a revised
recommendation and restated the motion as follows:
RESTATED MOTION It was moved by Council Members
Osborne/Henderson to approve the revised agreement, subject to review and
approval by the City Manager and the City's legal counsel, of supporting
documentation that illustrates the relationship between Chicago Title
Insurance Company and Village Resorts LLC, including without limitation,
Village Resort's Operating Agreement and a conformed copy of its most
recently-filed Statement of Information. Motion carried with Mayor Adolph
voting NO.
Council recessed to and until 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENT - None
PRESENTATIONS - None
City Council Minutes
17
September 5, 2006
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1 . PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO VACATE A
420:t SQUARE-FOOT PORTION OF CALLE T AMPICO NEAR A VENIDA
VILLA.
Public Works Director Jonasson presented the staff report.
The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 7:06 p.m. There being
no requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at
7:06 p.m.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINT A,
CALIFORNIA, VACATING A 420:t SQUARE-FOOT PORTION OF CALLE
TAMPICO NEAR AVENIDA VILLA (CASE NO. RW-V 2005-013).
It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Osborne to adopt Resolution No.
2006-101 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
BUSINESS SESSION . . . . . . . . . . continued
3. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING ON THE COACHELLA VALLEY FRINGE-TOED LIZARD
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN REGARDING "MEASURES TO MINIMIZE
AND MITIGATE TAKE OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY FRINGE-TOED LIZARD"
TO PROVIDE AN EXTENSION OF THE CURRENT MOU UNTIL AUGUST 31,
2007.
Community Development Director Evans presented the staff report.
Council Member Henderson voiced concern about signing any document of
this nature because of Proposition 90 on the November ballot.
City Attorney Jenson stated when she spoke to Michelle at CV AG about it,
she indicated they would deal with it if it passes. She advised of language in
Proposition 90 that prohibits government from taking or damaging private
property without just compensation, and its definition of damage is much
broader than what currently exists in the State Constitution. It states
damage includes government actions resulting in substantial economic loss
to private property and cites examples such as: down-zoning of private
property; elimination of access; and limitation on use of private air space As
for the MOU, she feels the pay-and-you-go fee is a plus value to the
City Council Minutes
18
September 5, 2006
property, and that an argument can't be made that the MOU is a, negative.
Her concerns relate more to the Multi-Species Habitat Plan (MSHP) because
it may be difficult to say a property has not suffered damage pursuant to
these provisions. She has a problem with language in the MOU about using
best efforts not to approve projects that are determined through the interim
project review process to be inconsistent with the MSHP conservation
objectives. . She noted, under the plan, that determination is supposed to be
made by the City Council. If the initiative passes, she feels it will be
important to take a close look to see whether or not a plan like the MSHP
will work under this. She doesn't have a problem with the MOU without the
language but with it she has concerns about what it means for people in
conservation areas.
Mayor Adolph indicated he has voiced concern about this at the Executive
Board meeting, and requested CV AG look into it because it could have major
financial impacts on the cities.
Ms. Jenson advised the resolution used to adopt the plan had one out, which
is if the Council action results in inverse condemnation, they don't have to
deny the project. She commented on the need to craft language that will
limit liability should Proposition 90 pass. Her preference is Option 1, striking
the sentence and initialing it. She isn't sure what effect it will have on the
Fringe-Toed Lizard issue. The City could be in the position of having to do
project-by-project biological studies.
Mr. Evans noted if California Fish & Game decides there is no MOU because
of striking out the language, CV AG can negotiate with the State to eliminate
the language.
Council Member Kirk asked if the other cities have made, or plan. to make,
changes to the MOU, and has the potential for changes been discussed with
CVAG.
Mr. Evans stated staff has not discussed the potential with CVAG, and he is
not aware of any changes by other cities.
Council Member Kirk commented on Section 5 being the only risk area in
La Quinta, and being the most risk-adverse city in regard to the MSHP for
having the least amount of risk, except for maybe the City of Indian Wells.
He doesn't understand the purpose of spending so much time and energy on
such a low-risk matter.
Council Member Henderson noted there could be a cost liability factor for all
of the cities if one of them is involved with litigation on this matter.
City Council Minutes
19
September 5, 2006
Council Member Kirk commented on government being so controlled by
liability fears that it spends a lot of time and energy on matters that it
shouldn't, such as this.
Mayor Adolph noted a number of changes were' made to the MSHP that
were proposed by City staff legal counsel. He feels the City ,is adamant
about protecting the cities from backlash on the MSHP, and that the money
was well spent for the entire Valley.
Mr. Evans explained staff's caution about the language is because of how
some property owners have indicated they are being treated by Fish &
Wildlife. He feels it's rare for a negative finding such as this to be written
into legislation and completely opposite of how he feels government
documents should be written. He advised staff from some of the other cities
have indicated they don't have time to read these documents but La Quinta
staff takes the time, and will continue doing so until told to do different.
Council Member Henderson asked if the permit would still be valid without
the City's membership.
Ms. Jenson stated if the permit is revoked, she expects they would try to
revoke it in the City's jurisdiction.
In response to Council Member Osborne, Ms. Jenson confirmed CV AG would
probably allow this to come back to the Council for further consideration if
they don't accept striking the language.
Council Member Sniff left the dais during consideration of this item due to
illness, and was not present when action was taken.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Osborne/Kirk to approve the
Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding on the Coachella Valley
Fringe-Toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan and authorize the Mayor to
execute the Amendment, striking out the language #...and.the Cities and the
County sha/I use best efforts not to approve development in Conservatio.n
Areas that is determined through the Interim project Review process to be
inconsistent with the MSHCP Conservation Objectives" and direct the Mayor
to initial the strikeout. Motion carried with Council Member Sniff ABSENT.
City Council Minutes
20
September 5, 2006
5. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING RULES OF PROCEDURE
FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS AND RELATED 'FUNCTIONS AND ACTIVITIES.
City Manager Genovese presented the staff report.
Mayor Adolph noted the time change would be for a trial period that can be
changed back if it doesn't work out.
In response to Council Member Osborne, Mr. Genovese clarified study
sessions would be held prior to the regular 3:30 p.m. meeting time. Starting
at 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. would allow two hours for the open business
session with closed session being at 3:30 p.m.
Council Member Osborne stated continuing items to the following day would
be a problem with his work schedule.
Mayor Adolph noted Council would always have the option of continuing
past 10:00 p.m. if needed.
Council Member Kirk stated he feels the 10:00 p.m. deadline is intended to
be a guideline to avoid having people wait in the Council Chambers until
1 :00 a.m.
Council Member Henderson stated she feels it would be fair at some point
during the evening session for the Mayor to announce an estimated time for
the meeting to end so people can leave instead of waiting. She suggested
trying it for three meetings then coming back on an agenda for discussion.
She commented on the amount of business the City has to handle, and
stated she isn't sure the business session can be handled in two hours but is
willing to try it.
Council Member Sniff questioned Council being able to give public issues
proper attention if their eyes are on the clock. He views the proposed
changes as unnecessary and somewhat self-serving, and rejects the
changes. He suggested an alternative solution would be for each Council
Member to cut down on their comments and for the interview process to be
compacted. He voiced concern about changing the basic outline and format
that has been in place for years, and stated he doesn't know how the
Redevelopment Agency and Financing Authority would fit in with the
changes. He feels there is a lack of logical consistency in having the
meeting start at different times.
Mayor Adolph commented on late meetings being difficult on staff who have
to be at work early the next morning.
City Council Minutes
21
September 5, 2006
Council Member Kirk agreed Council can always go back to the former
format if the changes don't work.
Council Member Sniff left the dais during discussion of this item due to
illness, and was not present when action was taken.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINT A,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS
AND RELATED FUNCTIONS AND ACTIVITIES.
It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Henderson to adopt Resolution No.
2006-102 as submitted, accepting the subcommittee's recommendation to
change the start time to 3:30 p.m. for closed session and 4:30 p.m. for
open session for a trial period of three meetings and reconsider and evaluate
the time change at the fourth meeting. Motion carried with Council Member
Sniff ABSENT.
6. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT
WITH VIGALL ART FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE ARCH
SCULPTURE ADDITION.
(This item was moved from Consent Item No.6.)
Community Services Director Hylton presented the staff report.
Council Member Osborne inquired about how the quail would be attached to
keep them from being broken off.
Tim Vigallon, the artist, stated the pieces can be cemented from the bottom
and welded at the top. He confirmed the pieces will be flat but offset to
provide a three-dimensional effect.
Council Member Henderson noted children sometimes play in the area, and
voiced concern about them getting hurt.
Mr. Vigallon stated the pieces will be thick stainless steel, and rounded on
the edges.
Council Member Henderson suggested one of the pieces be situated in front
of the arch so that the quail's head is centered to the post.
City Council Minutes
22
September 5, 2006
In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Vigallon stated he understood the
intent was to look like the City logo, which is why he proposes the trees
being green.
Council Member Kirk noted 12-gauge steel wouldn't be easily removed and
asked about intentional damage.
Mr. Vigallon stated he would be able to repair it, and commented on how the
various pieces would be secured.
Council Member Sniff left the meeting during discussion of this item due to
illness.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Kirk to approve the
Art Purchase Agreement in the amount of $9,000 with Vigall Art for the
design and construction of the Arch Sculpture addition. Motion carried with
Council Member Sniff ABSENT.
8. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO DISTRIBUTE A REQUEST FOR
PROPOSAL FOR THE REDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA WEBSITE.
There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the
City Clerk's Office.
In response to Council Member Kirk, Finance Director Falconer stated he
agrees the insurance requirements could discourage some people from
submitting proposals but advised the requirements are normal for City
business licenses. As for the list of tasks and need to allow creativity, he
stated he pelieves the intent is to give the responders an idea of what the
City is looking for. The committee is not looking for a "cookie-cutter" design
but something that is different from other websites. He indicated he is not
aware of any provision that would prohibit current consultants, such as Kiner
Communications, from submitting a proposal. He stated staff would be open
to adding someone from the private sector to the Selection Committee if
Council wishes.
Council Member Osborne stated he likes the idea of having someone from
Kiner Communications on the Selection Committee.
City Council Minutes
23
September 5, 2006
Mr. Falconer advised the RFP will 'be sent to a number of firms on the vendor
list, and Kiner Communications has voiced an interest in bidding on this.
Therefore, it wouldn't be appropriate to have them on the Selection
Committee.
City Manager Genovese suggested the Council could direct him to add
someone to the Selection Committee once it is known that they haven't
responded to the RFP. As for the list of tasks, it's primarily to make sure the
vendors are aware of the cOllJplexity and level of needs.
Council Member Kirk asked if posting staff reports on the website would be
included in the RFP.
Mr. Falconer stated that is an option already available.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Henderson to: 1) approve
distribution of the Request for Proposal for redesign and development of the
City of La Quinta website; 2) direct the City Manager, after the responses to
the RFP have been received, to identify a non-governmental employee to
help with the selection process; and 3) modify the Scope of Work to include
posting of staff reports. Motion carried with Council Member Sniff ABSENT.
STUDY SESSION - None
REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
CV AG Human & Community Resources Committee - Council Member Osborne
reported he has voiced opposition to the Homeless Task Force becoming a standing
committee instead of an advisory committee. He indicated members of the Task
Force were allowed to participate in the Committee vote.
A brief discussion ensued regarding the potential new committee and the allowance
of non-members to participate in the vote. Council concurred to direct Council
Member Osborne and the City Manager to draft a report in opposition for Council
Member Osborne to take to the next HCRC meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
All other reports were noted and filed.
City Council Minutes
24
September 5, 2006
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
3-B. MEETING SCHEDULE FOR JOINT CITY COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETINGS.
Council directed staff to schedule a Joint City Council/Commission meeting
for October 24, 2006 at 5:00 p.m.
3-C. VOLUNTEER POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS' ANNUAL DINNER AND HOLIDAY
OPEN HOUSE.
Council concurred to select Wednesday, November 1,2006, for the Police'
and Firefighter's annual dinner, and directed staff to look into using Embassy
Suites or Palmer's Restaurant for the event.
Council also selected Thursday, December 7, 2006, for the Holiday Open
House.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS
1. DISCUSSION REGARDING ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM.
Council Member Kirk suggested looking into the possibility of removing the
artwork at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street.
After a brief discussion, Council concurred to direct staff to review the
original contract, and bring it back to Council to discuss possible
removal/relocation.
* * * * * * * * *
2. DISCUSSION REGARDING CAL TRANS.
Council Member Osborne spoke regarding the difficulty of working with
CalTrans on various projects, and suggested sending letters to State
representatives to help with the issues. City Manager Genovese requested
one week to sort through the issues before sending the letters. .
Council Member Henderson commented on the new Director of CalTrans'
desire to improve their relationship with cities, and stated she will try to
facilitate a meeting between the City and the CalTrans staff member that
participates in RCTC to try to address these issues.
City Council Minutes
25
September 5, 2006
Council recessed to the Redevelopment Agency meeting and Closed Session as
delineated on Page 1.
The City Council meeting was reconvened with no decisions being made in Closed
Session which require reporting pursuant to Section 54957.1 of the Government
Code (Brown Act).
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
~o ~L ---J.L~~
DEBORAH H. POWELL, Interim City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California