1992 07 13 CSC Special MeetingTAT 4 64�aW�r�
78-105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564-2241
FAX (619) 564-561'
COMMUNITY S E RV I C E S COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA
La Quinta Council Chambers
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, CA 92253
July 13, 1992
5:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.
III. PUBLIC COMMENT
The Community Services Commission reserves the right to
limit discussion on any topic to five minutes or less.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIALS
A. "Leisure Lines", CPRS Newsletter
V. COMMISSION BUSINESS
A. Parks and Recreation
1. Community Park -North Workshop.
2. Discussion of Fritz Burns Community Park
Materials.
MAILING ADDRESS PO. BOX 1504 LA OLJINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253
VI. NEXT MEETING DATE, TIME AND TOPICS
Monday, July 27, 1992 - 7:00 P.M., Regular CSC Meeting
at City Council Chambers.
Topics: Election of Chairman
& Vice -Chairman for Community
Services Commission,
Appointment of alternate CSC
representative at City Council
meetings, Designation of
Legislative "Watch" person,
Commission Manual, CAPRCBM
Academy Training, Parks and
Recreation Master Plan
Elements, Fritz Burns Park
Design Review.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
-2-
C&I�p 44QN/Nfb
MEMORANDUM
To: Community Services Commission
From: Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager
Date: July 13, 1992
Subj: Community Park - North Workshop - Item V.A.1.
BACKGROUND
As the Commission will recall, Steven Lang of Purkiss-Rose/RSI Inc., conducted a public and
Commission workshop on the two (2) Community Park - North schematic, conceptual designs
at the last CSC regular meeting.
At this meeting, the Commission reviewed the drawings, and provided comment to Mr. Lang, as
did the public present. This was the third opportunity that the public had to review the drawings,
and the first time that the Commission had to see the drawings. The Commission felt that they
would like the opportunity to see the drawings a second time, and to study the features of the
proposed design with greater scrutiny.
The July 13 meeting will see Mr. Lang presenting a final conceptual drawing based on the
Commission and public comment from the last regular Commission meeting. The Preliminary
Development Plans #1 and #2 (dated 6-26-92) are included in the packet for reference sake, as is
the new, revised plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission review the enclosed conceptual drawings, and prepare
comments. Further, staff and Mr. Lang ask that the Commission, if possible, provide final
comment and a recommendation to the City Council on the design, at the conclusion of this
meeting.
ATE June 5, 1992
City of La Quinta
DDREss 78-105 Cal l e EStado
TY La Quinta, CA 92253
FTN Clint Bohlen
Community Park North
E ARE TRANSMITTING
'
kiss -roc . _ .
'zndscape Archdectu
Recreation and Park Placr
\orth Hwhor hnu:
.6erton Cahforma -
'kX 1714i 87''
7141 871 3e3�
KPRINTS
SAMPLES
AS REQUESTED
CRIGINALS
SHCP DRAWINGS
FCR APPROVAL
PRELIMINAR'ES
REPRODUCIBLES
FOR YOUR USE
SPECFICATIONS
PHOTOCOPY
FOR REVIEW AND COMP.'. '
CORRESPONDENCE
.PLEASE RETURN
)RWARDED VIA: . U.P.S.
MAIL . HAND
OTHER
)PIES:
DESCRIPTION
L
4 Concepts for
Community Park North
MARKS:
cased on comments received at first public meeting. We will add some
:olor to these concepts for presentation at Thursday night's meeting.
.et me know what you think or if we need to make any changes. Thanks.
Steve Lang
PIES To:
COMMUNITY PARK
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC
•
NORTH, LA QUINTA
MEETING, MAY 21, 1992
Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager, welcomed the
citizens who had accepted the City's invitation to participate
in the planning process for Community Park North. He also
introduced members of the City Council, Planning Commission and
Recreation Commission that were in attendance. Clint explained
the City's acquiring of the park site and the Quimby funds that
will be used to develop the park. He introduced Steve Lang
representing Purkiss-Rose-RSI, the landscape architectural firm
hired to prepare a master plan for this community park. Steve
reviewed the design process emphasizing the importance of
community input from as many different interests as possible.
Both Clint and Steve remarked that this is the only community
park site in the northern part of the City and, therefore, it is
important that it satisfy recreation needs that cannot be
addressed in the smaller neighborhood parks.
Steve briefly reviewed a site analysis map describing the
topography, future adjacent improvements and environmental
aspects of the 18.6 acre site. He also showed slides taken from
the site.
Steve asked those present to voice their concerns as well as
what recreation activities/amenities they would like to see at
the park. The lists are as follows:
Concerns:
Gang attraction
Proximity to High School
Duplication of High School recreation facilities
Convenient park for children
Security (suggested locating fire station in park)
Trash
Maintenance
Costs
Heat -shaded Activities
Night Lighting (No)
Traffic
Vistas
Topographic Features
Closed Campus for High School
Truancy
Park for Everybody
Provide Opportunities
Alternative Sites for
Environmental Impacts
Parking Overflow from
Athletic Field Demand
for Children
Ballfields
High School
Greater Than Available Facilities
'COMMUNITY PARK NORTH, LA QUINTA
Summary of Public Meeting, May 21, 1992
Page 2.
Recreation Activities/Amenities:
Shaded picnic area (3)
Shaded play area
Water toys
Paved pathways
Nature trail
Grass, trees, drinking fountain
Community Center building
Exercise trail (circuit)
Tennis courts - lighted, keyed for residents
Open space
Day camp
Bike trails
Swimming pool
Lighted baseball/softball
Consider no athletic fields
Natural area - walking trails
Amphitheater
People watching - generational mix
Shuffleboard
Water feature
Volleyball
Badminton
Croquet
Golf Collaboration
Purkiss-Rose-RSI will prepare a number of concept plans with
input from this meeting to be presented at a public meting
scheduled for Thursday, June 11.
SNL/fc:140
cc: Clint Bohlen
June 16, 1992
City of La Quinta
[,:DRESS
TY
._N Clint Bohlen
E Community Park North
'E ARE TRANSMITTING.
PRINTS
^RIG:NAL.�
PREL;MINARIES
;PFCF'CATIONS
:CRRESPONDENCE
)RWARDED VIA:
)PIES:
1
.MARKS:
s Steve Lang
)PIES TO:
SAMPLES
9iC" Do AWLKGS
REPRCDUCIBLES
ph, :'u 3SS•YGl:
.ndscape ArcnxE E. .
R.�reahon and Park var -
%xin Harbor
rron.:a!'fcrr, e
%X "4i 8,"
"4i 87' 3�
- . AS RFCUESTED
FCR �•�RCYAL
g FCR FOUR USE
FOR Rr ":EW AND C.
PLEA: RETURN
U.P.S. X MAIL HAND OTHER
DESCRIPTION
Summary of June filth Public Meeting
COMMUNITY PARK NORTH, LA QUINTA
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC MEETING
JUNE 11, 1992
Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager, welcomed approximately 40-50 citizens to
the second public hearing in the planning process for Community Park North. He
reintroduced Steve Lang of Purkiss-Rose-RSI representing the landscape architectural firm
hired to prepare a master plan for this community park. Steve briefly reviewed the design
process and the outcome of this first meeting which identified a list of concerns and desired
recreation activities. Two additional recreation activities were identified --basketball
court(s) and paved walks for bicycle trail.
Before reviewing the four concept plans, Steve showed some general park development
slides with site amenities similar to those being considered at Community Park North.
An early question was brought up regarding the proposal made at the first meeting to
expand the adjacent golf range to include park property. Steve indicated that this proposal
was not pursued once the proposed expansion (4.8 t acres) was laid out on the site. Clint
did not feel this was a viable proposal as it encroached one quarter into the park site. Steve
showed an exhibit which indicated the reduced limits of the park with the golf expansion.
The consensus was that this represented too much of the community park to give up for
such a specialized use.
Steve proceeded to describe each of the four concept plans.
Includes two lighted softball fields with independent lighted soccer field; four lighted tennis
courts; two children's play areas; 3,500 sq. ft. recreation building with adjacent shuffleboard
and horseshoe courts; large open passive area with informal grass amphitheater, pond
feature, group picnic shelter and convenient restroom. A restroom/concession building is
located between the two softball fields. Convenient parking is available to serve the
ballfields and passive area with one lot off of Adams (120 cars) and one lot on Westward
Ho Drive (60 cars).
A disadvantage of this concept is the 250'outfield limit line at the two softball fields. A 300'
outfield limit is preferred for adult softball. The width of the site restricts one outfield at
both diamonds.
0
Includes two lighted softball fields with 300' outfield limit and two overlay full-size soccer
fields; a concession/restroom; four lighted tennis courts; children's play area; stream/pond
feature; group picnic shelter with nearby restroom and a 3,500 sq. ft. recreation building.
Parking is provided with a 120-car area adjacent to the ballfields and a 50-car lot serving the
passive picnic area. Both parking areas are accessible from Westward Ho Drive.
Unlike Concepts A&B, this concept has no formal sportsfields. Amenities include a 10,000
sq. ft. community center at the intersection of Adams and Westward Ho Drives, two group
picnic shelters, a restroom building, children's play area, informal turf areas, a dry creek
feature, and an extensive trail system serving an elevated overlook and native area. A 120-
car parking area penetrates into the site serving the community center and the remainder of
the park.
This concept designates a 1.2 acre site as a possible fire station location. This was suggested
to promote additional surveillance of the park on a full-time basis.
The most significant element of this concept is a water element which would be three
informal ponds connected by a meandering stream feature. A centrally located community
center building (10,000+ sq. ft.) is served by an 180-car parking lot. Other amenities include
a water -side group picnic shelter; two restroom buildings; grass volleyball courts; an
informal grass amphitheater; children's play area; and panoramic overlook.
The general consensus of those at this meeting was a preference for Concepts A and B,
which included sportsfields. There was some concern expressed about duplicating facilities
that will be available across the street at the future high school site. Clint indicated that
some contact would be made with the school district to confirm the scope of their athletic
facilities as well as the potential for shared program use.
The lighted multi -use fields with 300' outfield limits and overlay full-size soccer fields in
Concept B seemed to be the preferred scheme. However, there were a number who favored
Concept A's parking off of Adams in addition to Westward Ho Drive, which we will
investigate. The consensus was that the larger community center type building serving 200-
300 people was needed to provide indoor recreation opportunities for this north section of
the City. Some senior activities (shuffleboard, horseshoes, putting green) were suggested in
association with the community center. All were in favor of an informal amphitheater area.
Most were in favor of some scaled down water feature with moving water to provide a
refreshing relief. It was agreed that lighted basketball half courts should be included with a
possible reduction to two tennis courts. Those at the meeting agreed that family picnic units
with covered shade shelters scattered throughout the park site would be popular and well
used. A shaded play area was favored with a separated area for tots and young children. It
was suggested that water toys or participative fountains be considered for play. The group
seemed to favor a more natural buffer planting around the edge of the park with a trail. It
was suggested that there be paved walks for rollerblades or small tots tricyclesfbicycles.
Clint once again thanked the group for their participation and requested their continued
input at the next meeting scheduled for Monday, June 29, 1992. At this meeting Steve will
present a refined plan incorporating the public input from this meeting and any follow up
from the Staffs review as well as estimated construction costs.
SUfc:wp
--
oNtl10
j{ •
{'
ITIII
N WJVd AlWIttN oo
Yl d0 ALA
�I
- -
-
I
MEMORANDUM
To: Community Services Commission
From: Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager
Date: July 13, 1992 `
Subj: Community Park - North Workshop - Item V.A.1.
BACKGROUND
As the Commission will recall, Steven Lang of Purkiss-Rose/RSI Inc., conducted a public and
Commission workshop on the two (2) Community Park - North schematic, conceptual designs
at the last CSC regular meeting.
At this meeting, the Commission reviewed the drawings, and provided comment to Mr. Lang, as
did the public present. This was the third opportunity that the public had to review the drawings,
and the first time that the Commission had to see the drawings. The Commission felt that they
would like the opportunity to see the drawings a second time, and to study the features of the
proposed design with greater scrutiny.
The July 13 meeting will see Mr. Lang presenting a final conceptual drawing based on the
Commission and public comment from the last regular Commission meeting. The Preliminary
Development Plans #1 and #2 (dated 6-26-92) are included in the packet for reference sake, as is
the new, revised plan.
Staff recommends that the Commission review the enclosed conceptual drawings, and prepare
comments. Further, staff and Mr. Lang ask that the Commission, if possible, provide final
comment and a recommendation to the City Council on the design, at the conclusion of this
meeting.
•
ATE June 5, 1992
D City of La Quinta
DDRESS 78-105 Calle EStado
STY La Quinta, CA 92253
TTN Clint Bohlen
E Community Park North
rE ARE TRANSMITTING.
4R:NTS
ORIGINALS
. PRELIMINARIES
5PECFICAT!ONS
CORRESPONDENCE
)RWARDED VIA:
DRIES:
1
U.PS
SAMPLES
SHCP"RNA `1(.9
REPR .DUCiBLES
PHCTOCCP
MAIL HAND OTHER
.'noscape Archiwtu,
Remanon and Park Plannme,
n Hdroor 6c.,
adtorna
^d 47—
i RT i.ix
_ AS REQUESTED
ICR
FOR YOUR USE
FOR REYIFW AND COMIC '
PLEASF RETURN
DESCRIPTION.
4 Concepts for Community Park North
EMARKS:
Based on comments received at first public meeting. We will add some
color to these concepts for presentation at Thursday night's meeting.
Let me know what you think or if we need to make any changes. Thanks.
r. Steve Lang
DRIES TO:
COMMUNITY PARK
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC
•
NORTH, LA QUINTA
MEETING, MAY 21, 1992
Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager, welcomed the
citizens who had accepted the City's invitation to participate
in the planning process for Community Park North. He also
introduced members of the City Council, Planning Commission and
Recreation Commission that were in attendance. Clint explained
the City's acquiring of the park site and the Quimby funds that
will be used to develop the park. He introduced Steve Lang
representing Purkiss-Rose-RSI, the landscape architectural firm
hired to prepare a master plan for this community park. Steve
reviewed the design process emphasizing the importance of
community input from as many different interests as possible.
Both Clint and Steve remarked that this is the only community
park site in the northern part of the City and, therefore, it is
important that it satisfy recreation needs that cannot be
addressed in the smaller neighborhood parks.
Steve briefly reviewed a site analysis map describing the
topography, future adjacent improvements and environmental
aspects of the 18.6 acre site. He also showed slides taken from
the site.
Steve asked those present to voice their concerns as well as
what recreation activities/amenities they would like to see at
the park. The lists are as follows:
Concerns:
Gang attraction
Proximity to High School
Duplication of High School recreation facilities
Convenient park for children
Security (suggested locating fire station in park)
Trash
Maintenance
Costs
Heat -shaded Activities
Night Lighting (No)
Traffic
Vistas
Topographic Features
Closed Campus for High School
Truancy
Park for Everybody
Provide Opportunities
Alternative Sites for
Environmental Impacts
Parking Overflow from
Athletic Field Demand
for Children
Ballfields
High School
Greater Than Available Facilities
a •
'COMMUNITY PARK NORTH, LA QUINTA
Summary of Public Meeting, May 21, 1992
Page 2.
Recreation Activities/Amenities:
Shaded picnic area (3)
Shaded play area
Water toys
Paved pathways
Nature trail
Grass, trees, drinking fountain
Community Center building
Exercise trail (circuit)
Tennis courts - lighted, keyed for residents
Open space
Day camp
Bike trails
Swimming pool
Lighted baseball/softball
Consider no athletic fields
Natural area - walking trails
Amphitheater
People watching - generational mix
Shuffleboard
Water feature
Volleyball
Badminton
Croquet
Golf Collaboration
Purkiss-Rose-RSI will prepare a number of concept plans with
input from this meeting to be presented at a public meting
scheduled for Thursday, June 11.
SNL/fC:140
cc: Clint Bohlen
rT June 16, 1992
City of La Quinta
)TRESS
TY
Clint Bohlen
Community Park North
E ARE TRANSMITTING.
PRINTS
RIG;NALS
PRELIMINARIES
SPFCF:CAT:ONS
CORFESPG",DENCE
)RWARDED VIA:
)PIES.
1
.MARKS:
1: Steve Lang
)PIES TO:
SAMPLES
SHCF C'RAIV'NGS
REPRODUCIBLES
MiOTInrCPy
113141K,12viSS''G.�
indscape Arcn:[ec•..
:tecreauon a d Park P ann,
AS REO::ESTED
FCft A, cap:'.Sim
X FOR YOUR USE
FOR R:'.' EN AND ,C' .. .
PLEASE _-URN
U.P.S. X MAIL HAND OTHER
DESCRIPTION -
Summary of June llth Public Meeting
0 •
COMMUNITY PARK NORTH, LA QUINTA
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC MEETING
JUNE 11, 1992
Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager, welcomed approximately 40-50 citizens to
the second public hearing in the planning process for Community Park North. He
reintroduced Steve Lang of Purkiss-Rose-RSI representing the landscape architectural firm
hired to prepare a master plan for this community park. Steve briefly reviewed the design
process and the outcome of this first meeting which identified a list of concerns and desired
recreation activities. Two additional recreation activities were identified --basketball
court(s) and paved walks for bicycle trail.
Before reviewing the four concept plans, Steve showed some general park development
slides with site amenities similar to those being considered at Community Park North.
An early question was brought up regarding the proposal made at the first meeting to
expand the adjacent golf range to include park property. Steve indicated that this proposal
was not pursued once the proposed expansion (4.8 t acres) was laid out on the site. Clint
did not feel this was a viable proposal as it encroached one quarter into the park site. Steve
showed an exhibit which indicated the reduced limits of the park with the golf expansion.
The consensus was that this represented too much of the community park to give up for
such a specialized use.
Steve proceeded to describe each of the four concept plans.
Includes two lighted softball fields with independent lighted soccer field; four lighted tennis
courts; two children's play areas; 3,500 sq. ft. recreation building with adjacent shuffleboard
and horseshoe courts; large open passive area with informal grass amphitheater, pond
feature, group picnic shelter and convenient restroom. A restroom/concession building is
located between the two softball fields. Convenient parking is available to serve the
ballfields and passive area with one lot off of Adams (120 cars) and one lot on Westward
Ho Drive (60 cars).
A disadvantage of this concept is the 250'outfield limit line at the two softball fields. A 300'
outfield limit is preferred for adult softball. The width of the site restricts one outfield at
both diamonds.
Includes two lighted softball fields with 300' outfield limit and two overlay full-size soccer
fields; a concession/restroom; four lighted tennis courts; children's play area; stream/pond
feature; group picnic shelter with nearby restroom and a 3,500 sq. ft. recreation building.
Parking is provided with a 120-car area adjacent to the ballfields and a 50-car lot serving the
passive picnic area. Both parking areas are accessible from Westward Ho Drive.
Unlike Concepts A&B, this concept has no formal sportsfields. Amenities include a 10,000
sq. ft. community center at the intersection of Adams and Westward Ho Drives, two group
picnic shelters, a restroom building, children's play area, informal turf areas, a dry creek
feature, and an extensive trail system serving an elevated overlook and native area. A 120-
car parking area penetrates into the site serving the community center and the remainder of
the park.
This concept designates a 1.2 acre site as a possible fire station location. This was suggested
to promote additional surveillance of the park on a full-time basis.
The most significant element of this concept is a water element which would be three
informal ponds connected by a meandering stream feature. A centrally located community
center building (10,000+ sq. ft.) is served by an 180-car parking lot. Other amenities include
a water -side group picnic shelter; two restroom buildings; grass volleyball courts; an
informal grass amphitheater; children's play area; and panoramic overlook.
The general consensus of those at this meeting was a preference for Concepts A and B,
which included sportsfields. There was some concern expressed about duplicating facilities
that will be available across the street at the future high school site. Clint indicated that
some contact would be made with the school district to confirm the scope of their athletic
facilities as well as the potential for shared program use.
The lighted multi -use fields with 300' outfield limits and overlay full-size soccer fields in
Concept B seemed to be the preferred scheme. However, there were a number who favored
Concept A's parking off of Adams in addition to Westward Ho Drive, which we will
investigate. The consensus was that the larger community center type building serving 200-
300 people was needed to provide indoor recreation opportunities for this north section of
the City. Some senior activities (shuffleboard, horseshoes, putting green) were suggested in
association with the community center. All were in favor of an informal amphitheater area.
Most were in favor of some scaled down water feature with moving water to provide a
refreshing relief. It was agreed that lighted basketball half courts should be included with a
possible reduction to two tennis courts. Those at the meeting agreed that family picnic units
with covered shade shelters scattered throughout the park site would be popular and well
used. A shaded play area was favored with a separated area for tots and young children. It
was suggested that water toys or participative fountains be considered for play. The group
seemed to favor a more natural buffer planting around the edge of the park with a trail. It
was suggested that there be paved walks for rollerblades or small tots tricycles/bicycles.
Clint once again thanked the group for their participation and requested their continued
input at the next meeting scheduled for Monday, June 29, 1992. At this meeting Steve will
present a refined plan incorporating the public input from this meeting and any follow up
from the Staffs review as well as estimated construction costs.
SL/fc:wp
z w
°f'��F THEo�54e MEMORANDUM
To: Community Services Commission
From: Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manage) /.
Date: July 8, 1992 11/
Subj: Fritz Bums Community Park materials; discussion of - Item V.A.2.
BACKGROUND
The attached materials are from T.I. Maloney, Inc., and were produced as a result of the public
workshops that they have held in the last month. You will note that there are preliminary cost
estimates for two different designs, as well as a drawing of and a separate description of the
recreation center. Additionally, please find a summary of public input, and the record of the
voting that took place relative to the preferences of the public workshop attendees for each
drawing's placement of facilities.
At the July 13 special meeting of the Commission, staff would like to discuss the attached
materials with the Commission. The three "color -ups" which the Commission viewed at their
last regular meeting will also be available for reference. Staff hopes at the July 13 meeting to
present a draft of the final drawing. This final draft will be viewed by the public for their
comments at the July 16 Public Workshop for Fritz Burns Community Park, 7:00pm, Council
Chambers. Commissioners are encouraged to attend this meeting. A colored -up, refined final
drawing will again be presented to the Commission at their next regular meeting in July by T.I.
Maloney, Inc. following the 16th workshop input by the public.
RECOMMENDATION
Please review the attached for comment and questions of staff at the July 13 meeting.
FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK
WORKSHOP #2
JUNE 25, 1992
OVERALL SCHEME A B(8) C(7)
DO NOT
SITE AMENITIES
PREFERRED LOCATTON
INCLUDE
Building Location
A(1)
B(6)
C(5)
D(2)
Pool System
A(7)
B(4)
C(5)
D
Children's Play Area
A(2)
B(7)
C(7)
D
Maze/Play Court
A(1)
B(8)
Teen/Adult Play
A(1)
B(8)
D(2)
Tennis Courts Set -Ups
A(1)
B(5)
C(6)
D(2)
Center Court
A
B(3)
C(7)
D(3)
Basketball
A
B(1)
C(7)
D(2)
Volleyball
A(1)
C(10)
D(2)
Group Picnic Structure
A(5)
B(6)
C(1)
D(1)
Arbors
B(7)
C(7)
D(1)
Open Play Area
A(1)
B(4)
C(11)
Parking / Drive System
A(2)
B(4)
C(8)
Pool System
A(5)
B(2)
C(4)
D
Portion North of Park
B(10)
C(1)
D(1)
Additional Comments:
A:FAITZI.BAL (0-117)
FRITZ BCJRN'S", � JMMU,'NI T"Y PARK
..
COMMENTS
1. BUILDING LOCATION - PUT NEAR PARKING AREA
2. BASKETBALL - MOVE COURTS UP
3. POOL SYSTEM - SHAPE POOL DIFFERENT - SHALLOW SIDEJSLAND SLIDE,DEEP AREA
4. PORTION NORTH OF PARK - LAWN BOWL & HORSE SHOES
5. CRUSHED ROCK WALKWAYSIMIN CONCRETE
6. SOLAR ON ROOF OF COMMUNITY BUILDING
7. WANT SCHEME'C' BUT WITH A POOL
8. BUILDING LOCATION - SOUTHWEST CORNER
9. BUILDING LOCATION - CLOSER TO OLD 52
10. POOL SYSTEM - PREFER T SHAPE, PROVIDE SHADED AREA
11. BASKETBALL - SCHEME'C' MOVE TO NORTH
12. ARBORS - VERY GOOD
13. PARKING/DRIVE SYSTEM - MAJOR PARKING OFF OLD 52
14. COMMENTS - POOL MAXIMUM SIZE TRY TO SEGREGATE PLAY AREA FROM SWIM AREA
15. COMMENTS - PLEASE KEEP THE BUILDING (RESTROOMS) CENTRAL TO CHILDRENS
PLAY AREA, SWIMMING AND TENNIS. MORE SHADE TREES AROUND PLAY AREA IN PLAN
'B' NEEDED.
16. COMMENTS - TRY TO MAKE OPEN AREA AS OPEN AS POSSIBLE FOR
FOOTBALUSOCCER FIELDS
17. HAVE DOUBLE COURT FOR BASKETBALL AND GET RID OF 2 TENNIS COURTS.
MAKE SURE THAT OPEN PLAY IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR SOCCER FIELDS
18. COMMENTS - THERE SHOULD BE AT LEASE 10 TENNIS COURTS. BECAUSE THE MAIN
BUILDING IS AT THE EXTREME END OF THE PARK AND WILL HAVE RESTROOMS - IT
MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL LAVATORY BUILDING. ALSO
YOU'RE PUTTING TOO MANY FACILITIES IN THIS PARK. A TENNIS AND SWIM
FACILITY IS ENOUGH
19. BUILDING LOCATION - MOVE TO SW CORNER NEAR PARKING OF OLD AVE 52
20. GROUP PICNIC STRUCTURE - IS THERE ROOM TO PUT IN AN A AND B PICNIC
STRUCTURE IN THE'C' PICNIC AREA
21. COMMENTS - I LIKED THE IDEA OF A DRIVE -UP DROP OFF AREA FOR PARENTS TO
TAKE CHILDREN TO THE POOL
22. BUILDING LOCATION - HAVE ALL PARKING ENTER ON OLD 52, MOVE BUILDING WHERE
BASKETBALL IS. HAVE A TEEN/ADULT PLAY IN SCHEME 'C'. HAVE SKATE BUILD AREA
ACROSS FROM 52 AVE. PUT GROUP PICNIC STRUCTURE IN 'C'
23. PARKING/DRIVE SYSTEM - ALL PARKING ON OLD AVE 52
24. POOL SYSTEM - 'A' WITH A SLIDE
25. TEEN/ADULT PLAY - 'B' BUT MOVE ACROSS 52
26. BUILDING LOCATION - MOVE TO SW CORNER
27. POOL SYSTEM - MOVE TO SW CORNER
28. COMMENTS - DO NOT PUT PARKING EXIT/ENTRY ON AVE 52
29. HURRY
30. BUILDING SIZE - NEEDS TO BE BIG
31. POOL SYSTEM - SHAPE 'A'
32. ADD A DROP OFF AREA 'A'
33. SKATE BOARD PARK ACROSS 52 (& TEEN PLAY OUT) SPACE FOR "ART"
PLAY EQUIPMENT
34. SWITCH BUILDING LOCATION WITH BASKETBALL
35. PARKING/DRIVE SYSTEM MIGHT BE A SAFETY HAZARD OFF OF AVE 52 CM
36. POOL SYSTEM - 'C' WITH WINGS
(DISC 121) A:F nzcwr
•
kTE :
IOJECT:
t. i. maloney, inc,
landscape arctutecture • plcm=g
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
25-Jun-92 PAGE: 1 OF 3
FRITZ BURNS PARK ESTIMATE BY: RONAELE WOLF
SCHEME 'B' MARK SCIONEAUX
PROJECT # 911139
UNIT TOT
3SCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST COS
;MOLITION AND CLEARING
CLEAR AND GRUB 521626 S.F. $0.05 $26
DEMO 2 TENNIS COURTS ALLOW $10,000.00 $10
)NSTRUCTION
?LAY GROUND
PLAY EQUIPMENT
ALLOW
$50,000.00
$50
PLAY AREA CONC CURB 12 "X30"
282
L.F.
$22.50
$6
FIBAR
3629
S.F.
$3.00
$10
SUMP (6' DEEP X 4' DIA.)
2
EACH
$500.00
$1
PLAY MAZE FENCING
650
L.F.
$17.50
$11
CENNIS
TENNIS COURTS (2)
13900
S.F.
$2.15
$29
TENNIS FENCE (10')
550
L.F.
$18.00
$9
TENNIS GATE (81)
4
EACH
$175.00
TENNIS HARDWARE (PER COURT)
2
EACH
$400.00
COURT SIGNS
8
EACH
$175.00
$1
EXISTING COURT REPAIRS
ALLOW
$20,000.00
$20
CTE FEATURES
PICNIC TABLE (COATED METAL)
10
EACH
$850.00
$8
PICNIC TABLE PAD - 4" CONCRET
1000
S.F.
$2.75
$2
PICNIC SHELTER - 30' SQUARE
ALLOW
$30,000.00
$30
BAR-B-Q GRILL - DOUBLE
4
EACH
$470.00
$1
GAME TABLE
4
EACH
$600.00
$2
TRASH RECEPTACLE
10
EACH
$400.00
$4
TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES
1
EACH
$1,800.00
$1
TREE WELLS
20
EACH
$150.00
$3
TREE GRATE 4'
10
EACH
$450.00
$4
DRINKING FOUNTAIN (HANDICAP)
3
EACH
$1,000.00
$3
BENCH - COATED METAL
22
EACH
$500.00
$11
SIGNS (MONUMENT)
3
EACH
$2,500.00
$7
SITE SIGNAGE
ALLOW
$15,000.00
$15
RB 05 IG (RIBBON)
1
EACH
$450.00
RB 09 IG (RIBBON)
1
EACH
$750.00
ARBORS
ALLOW
$10,000.00
$1C
6180 Brockton Avenue, Suite 201, Riverside, California 92506 ■ (714) 369-0700 ■ FAX (714) 369-4039
ATE: 25-Jun-92
ROJECT: FRITZ BURNS PARK
SCHEME 'E'
PROJECT # 911139
PAGE: 2 OF 3
ESTIMATE BY: RONAELE WOLF
MARK SCIONEAUX
UNIT
TOT
ESCRIPTION
QTY. UNIT
COST
COS
!+LLS/FENCES
SEAT WALL 18" S.F.B.
60 L.F.
$38.00
$2
WALL 6' SLUMP BLOCK
400 L.F.
$40.00
$16
1 i�1`'L - * Z,
MOWSTRIP 6"
810
L.F.
$6.00
$4
CONC. CURB 6" (PKG.)
2000
L.F.
$10.00
$20
CURB/GUTTER (PKG.)
730
L.F.
$15.00
$10
WHEELCHAIR RAMP (CURB CUT)
5
EACH
$200.00
$1
CONCRETE PAVING - 4"
43382
S.F.
$2.00
$86
COLORED/STAMPED CONCRETE
1775
S.F.
$5.00
$8
ASPHALT PAVING (2.5")
W/SEAL COAT
65937
S.F.
$0.50
$32
8" AGGREGATE BASE
65937
S.F.
$0.20
$13
A/C "SLURRY SEAL"
65937
S.F.
$0.20
$13
CONCRETE BLEACHERS
877
L.F.
$30.00
$26
ANDSCAPING
SOIL PREP/FINE GRADING
306750
S.F.
$0.18
$55
WEED ABATEMENT
306750
S.F.
$0.03
$9
90 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD
306750
S.F.
$0.06
$18
TREES (36" BOX)
20
EACH
$575.00
$11
TREES (24"-BOX)
40
EACH
$250.00
$10
TREES (15 GAL)
67
EACH
$85.00
$5
PHOENIX DACTYLEFA (10')
60
EACH
$600.00
$36
PHOENIX DACTYLEFA (RELOCATE)
30
EACH
$200.00
$6
SHRUBS (5 GAL)
250
EACH
$14.00
$3
SHRUBS (1 GAL) G.C. 5' O.C.
3127
EACH
$5.00
$15
VINES (15 GAL)
50
EACH
$46.00
$2
VINES (1 GAL)
50
EACH
$5.00
TURF HYDROSEED
228565
S.F.
$0.05
$11
RRIGATION/ WATER/ SEWER
WATER METER 2"
2
EACH
$2,500.00
$5
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
1
EACH
$2,000.00
$2
i
ATE:
ROJECT:
25-Jun-92
FRITZ BURNS PARR
SCHEME ' B'
PAGE: 3 OF 3
ESTIMATE BY: RONAELE WOLF
MARK SCIONEA
PROJECT # 911139
UNIT TO7
ESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST C0:
AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM
LARGE AREAS
228565
S.F.
$0.30
$6f
SMALL AREAS
78175
S.F.
$1.00
$7f
MOISTURE SENSORS
ALLOW
$2,500.00
$;
DOMESTIC BACKFLOW
1
EACH
$1,000.00
$1
CONTROLLER
2
EACH
$2,000.00
$4
IGHTING/ ELECTRICAL
SERVICE/MAIN SWITCHBOARD
1
ALLOW
$15,000
$1°
SECURITY WALKWAY/LIGHTS
14
EACH
$2,000.00
$2E
PARK SIGN LIGHTS
9
EACH
$500.00
$4
PARKING LOT LIGHTS
15
EACH
$2,500.00
$3,
TENNIS COURT LIGHTS
12
EACH
$2,500.00
$3t
PLAY AREA LIGHTS
2
EACH
$2,000.00
$4
RADING/ DRAINAGE
GRADING
19300
C.Y.
$3.25
$6S
CATCH BASIN
4
EACH
$1,000.00
$S
6" DRAINLINE (C.M.P.)
120
L.F.
$12.00
$1
ISCELLANEOUS
CURB PAINT/STRIPING
ALLOW
$3,000.00
V
---------------------------- ------------------------------------------
** SUBTOTAL
$1,05�
** 10.00% CONTINGENCY
$10!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
** GRAND TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,16:
OOL
25Y x 25M POOL W/WADING
.RCHITECTURE
AQUATICS/TENNIS BLDG. 15000
:911139-B.WK1 (D-8)
ALLOW $539,200.00
S.F. $125.00
$535
$1 , 87!
maloney, inc,
i
U landscape arckutectllrEELfiffMY COST ESTIMATE
►TE: 25-Jun-92 PAGE: 1 OF 3
tOJECT: FRITZ BURNS PARK ESTIMATE BY: RONAELE WOLF
SCHEME 'C' MARK SCIONEAUX
PROJECT # 911139
UNIT TOTS
'sSCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST COS'
:MOLITION AND CLEARING
CLEAR AND GRUB 448294 S.F. $0.05 $22
DEMO 2 TENNIS COURTS ALLOW $10,000.00 $10
?LAY GROUND
PLAY EQUIPMENT
ALLOW
$50,000.00
$50
PLAY AREA CONC CURB 12 "X30"
300
L.F.
$22.50
$6
FIBAR
5325
S.F.
$3.00
$15
SUMP (6' DEEP X 4' DIA.)
2
EACH
$500.00
$1
)LLEYBALL
WASHED SILICA SAND
265
C.Y.
$20.00
$5
SUMP (6' DEEP x 4' DIA)
1
EACH
$500.00
NETS, POLES, ETC.
1
EACH
$400.00
ROPES
200
L.F.
$1.50
ROPE ANCHORS
6
EACH
$25.00
CONCRETE CURB (12" x 24")
280
L.F.
$25.00
$7
1SKETBALL -
FULL COURT
4860
S.F.
$4.00
$19
POLE, RIMS, ETC.
ALLOW
$2,000.00
$2
:NNIS
TENNIS COURTS (2)
13900
S.F.
$2.15
$29
TENNIS FENCE (10')
550
L.F.
$18.00
$9
TENNIS GATE (81)
4
EACH
$175.00
TENNIS HARDWARE (PER COURT)
2
EACH
$400.00
COURT SIGNS
8
EACH
$175.00
$1
EXISTING COURT REPAIRS
ALLOW
$20,000.00
$20
:TE FEATURES
PICNIC TABLE (COATED METAL)
10
EACH
$850.00
$8
PICNIC TABLE PAD - 4" CONCRET
1000
S.F.
$2.75
$2
ARBORS
ALLOW
$40,000.00
$40
BAR-B-Q GRILL - DOUBLE
4
EACH
$470.00
$1
GAME TABLE
4
EACH
$600.00
$2
TRASH RECEPTACLE
10
EACH
$400.00
$4
6180 Brockton Avenue, Suite 201, Riverside, California 92506 • (714) 369-0700 ■ FAX (714) 369-4039
u
ATE:
ROJECT:
25-Jun-92
FRITZ BURNS PARK
SCHEME 'C'
PROJECT # 911139
PAGE: 2 OF 3
ESTIMATE BY: RONAELE WOLF
MARK SCIONEA
UNIT TOT
ESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST COS
TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES
1
EACH
$1,800.00
$1
TREE WELLS
20
EACH
$150.00
$3
TREE GRATE 4'
10
EACH
$450.00
$4
DRINKING FOUNTAIN (HANDICAP)
3
EACH
$1,000.00
$3
BENCH - COATED METAL
22
EACH
$500.00
$11
SIGNS (MONUMENT)
3
EACH
$2,500.00
$7
SITE SIGNAGE
ALLOW
$15,000.00
$15
RB 05 IG (RIBBON)
1
EACH
$450.00
RB 09 IG (RIBBON)
1
EACH
$750.00
ALLS/FENCES
SEAT WALL 18" S.F.B.
60
L.F.
$38.00
$2
WALL 6' SLUMP BLOCK
400
L.F.
$40.00
$16
WALL 4' SLUMP BLOCK PLANTER
384
L.F.
$35.00
$13
ARDSCAPE
MOWSTRIP 6"
465
L.F.
$6.00
$2
CONC. CURB 6" (PKG.)
1800
L.F.
$10.00
$18
CURB/GUTTER (PKG.)
600
L.F.
$15.00
$9
WHEELCHAIR RAMP (CURB CUT)
5
EACH
$200.00
$1
CONCRETE PAVING - 4"
61779
S.F.
$2.00
$123
COLORED/STAMPED CONCRETE
4000
S.F.
$5.00
$2C
ASPHALT PAVING (2.5")
W/SEAL COAT
63800
S.F.
$0.50
$31
8" AGGREGATE BASE
63800
S.F.
$0.20
$12
A/C "SLURRY SEAL"
63800
S.F.
$0.20
$12
CONCRETE BLEACHERS
1900
L.F.
$30.00
$57
ANDSCAPING
SOIL PREP/FINE GRADING
194538
S.F.
$0.18
$3°
WEED ABATEMENT
194538
S.F.
$0.03
$`_
90 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD
194538
S.F.
$0.06
$11
TREES (36" BOX)
20
EACH
$575.00
$11
TREES (24" BOX)
40
EACH
$250.00
$1(
TREES (15 GAL)
67
EACH
$85.00
$.`
PHOENIX DACTYLEFA (10')
18
EACH
$600.00
$1C
PHOENIX DACTYLEFA (RELOCATE)
30
EACH
$200.00
$f
SHRUBS (5 GAL)
250
EACH
$14.00
$3
SHRUBS (1 GAL) G.C. 5' O.C.
3475
EACH
$5.00
$14
VINES (15 GAL)
50
EACH
$46.00
$2
VINES (1 GAL)
50
EACH
$5.00
TURF HYDROSEED
107736
S.F.
$0.05
$°
ATE:
25-Jun-92
ROJECT: FRITZ BURNS PARK
SCHEME ' C'
PROJECT # 911139
PAGE: 3 OF 3
ESTIMATE BY: RONAELE WOLF
MARK SCIONEA
UNIT TOT
ESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST COS
RRIGATION/ WATER/ SEWER
WATER METER 2"
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM
LARGE AREAS
SMALL AREAS
MOISTURE SENSORS
DOMESTIC BACKFLOW
CONTROLLER
IGHTING/ ELECTRICAL
SERVICE/MAIN SWITCHBOARD
SECURITY WALKWAY/LIGHTS
PARK SIGN LIGHTS
PARKING LOT LIGHTS
TENNIS COURT LIGHTS
PLAY AREA LIGHTS
BASKETBALL LIGHTS
RADING/ DRAINAGE
GRADING
CATCH BASIN
6" DRAINLINE (C.M.P.)
ISCELLANEOUS
CURB PAINT/STRIPING
k* SUBTOTAL
k* 10.00% CONTINGENCY
k* GRAND TOTAL
-------------------
DOL
25Y x 25M POOL
AQUATICS/TENNIS BLDG.
:911139-C.WK1 (D-8)
2
EACH
$2,500.00
$5
1
EACH
$2,000.00
$2
107736
S.F.
$0.30
$32
86802
S.F.
$1.00
$86
ALLOW
$2,500.00
$2
1
EACH
$1,000.00
$1
2
EACH
$2,000.00
$4
1
ALLOW
$15,000
$15
14
EACH
$2,000.00
$28
9
EACH
$500.00
$4
15
EACH
$2,500.00
$37
12
EACH
$2,500.00
$30
2
EACH
$2,000.00
$4
2
EACH
$2,500.00
$5
19300
C.Y.
$3.25
$62
4
EACH
$1,000.00
$4
120
L.F.
$12.00
$1
ALLOW
$3,000.00
$3
$1,085
$108
$1,193
ALLOW $492,000.00 $492
15000 S.F. $125.00 $1,875
Ll
Pitassi•Dalmc
A y J w
June 25, 1992
Mr. Clint Bohlen
Parks and Recreation Manager
City of La Quinta
P.O. Box 1504
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, CA 92253
Subject: Fritz Burns Park
Community Center Preliminary Program
Dear Clint:
Peter, Pitaw,
Arch
Alain Dalmau.
Arcr
As discussed at our meeting of June 17, 1992, this letter
will document the Preliminary Program requirements for the
Fritz Burns Park Community Center. The components of this
building may be as follows:
Community Room
Multi -Purpose Space with
counter work space
3 Meeting Rooms
Multi -Purpose for
crafts, classes, games
Kitchen/Concession. Space
Staff Office
with Reception counter and
work space
Restrooms
for Building and Park use
Exterior and Interior Access
2,000 sq. ft.
__4.0e`sq. ft. ea. "
_500 sq. ft.
3." sq. ft.
850 sq. ft.
9267 Haven Avenue, Suite 220 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • (714) 980-1361
Mr. Clint Bohlo •
• June 25, 1992
Page 2
' Lifeguard Office
250
sq.
ft.
Changing Area, Lockers,
Laundry
• Tennis/Swim "Pro" Shop
1,
sq.
ft. '
. Weight Room
2
sq.
ft.
Exercise Stations and
Conditioning Equipment
• Dance/Aerobics Room
1,000
sq.
ft.
• Locker Rooms (mens, womens)
5,000
sq.
ft.
with Restrooms, Showers,
Changing Areas and Family
Changing Rooms
Pool Equipment 700 sq. ft.*
Storage 150 sq. ft.*
Pool Apparatus
Janitors 100 sq. ft.
General Storage 500 sq. ft.
distributed throughout
Facility
• Electrical Service Room 100 sq. ft.
• Lobby/Circulation 3,000 sq. ft.
approximately 20% of
total component area
Total 19,150 sq. ft.
* Pool Equipment may be located in a separate structure.
Clint, please review this Preliminary Program and utilize it
for discussion at your Community Meeting. As you had
indicated last week, this program includes several elements
which may be considered part of your "wish list". Before
Schematic Design work can proceed, a final program should be
developed which meets yours and the communities desires.
Mr. Clint BohlE •
• June 25, 1992
Page 3
For the purposes of preliminary budgeting, we should allow
$110-$130/sq. ft. for building construction excluding
furnishings, equipment and fixtures. Please advise if you
are in need of additional information or if we can be of
assistance prior to your Community Meeting.
Very truly yours,
Pitassi'Balmau,Architects
Peter-J. Pitassi, AIA
Architect
PJP:cas
cc: Mark Scioneaux
T.I. Maloney, Inc.
oJ-
Mob,
Passi•Dalmau
AucU
NO
scvoNv In or�
rV4Sr ' r %-f--•
CAMM 141T*y r.•wuTl
Ar" • AX-8 • , gL, 8 i
14.361.611
N elM1r