The URL can be used to link to this page

1996 01 09 PCcZ — — a �OFTNt' PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA A Special Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Council Chamber 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California January 9, 1996 7:00 P.M. **NOTE** ALL AGENDA ITEMS NOT CONSIDERED BY 11:00 P.M. MAY BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING Beginning Resolution 95-047 Beginning Minute Motion 95-056 CALL TO ORDER - Flag Salute ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Planning Commission on matters relating to City planning and zoning which are not Agenda items. When addressing the Planning Commission, please state your name and address. PUBLIC HEARINGS Item .............. TENTATIVE TRACT 24890 - THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME Applicant ....... KSL Recreation Corporation, Inc. Location ........ Northwest of the intersection at 52nd Avenue and Jefferson Street in the Oak Tree West Specific Plan Request ......... Approval of a third one year time extension for Phase 9 to create 37 lots consisting of three single family, 34 duplex, and five lettered lots on ten acres within Specific Plan 85-006 Action ........... Resolution 96- PC/AGENDA 2 Item .............. TENTATIVE TRACT 26444 - SECOND TIME EXTENSION Applicant ....... La Quinta 33, A Minnesota Partnership 3 Location ........ :Northeast of the intersection of Jefferson Street and 53rd Avenue Request ......... Approval of a one year time extension for the subdivision of 32 acres into 98 single family and other amenity lots Action ........... Resolution 96- BUSINESS ITEMS Item .............. Applicant ........ Location ......... Request .......... Action ............ 2. Item .............. Applicant ........ Location ......... Request .......... Action ............ 3. Item .............. Applicant ........ Location ......... Request .......... Action ............ CONSENT CALENDAR PLOT PLAN 94-543 Ali Baba Farzaneh (Sesame Restaurant) Northwest of Washington Street and Calle Tampico Approval of a minor amendment regarding the exterior colors for a freestanding restaurant in the La Quinta Shopping Center Minute Motion 96- SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE 95-091 Liberty Mutual - Legends of Golf South of 54th Avenue and west of Madison Street Approval of temporary advertising for the Liberty Mutual Golf Tournament at PGA West Resort from March 18-24, 1996 Minute Motion 96- TRACT 23995 INCO Homes South side of Miles Avenue west of Adams Street Approval to modify the architectural design scheme of single famil} house prototypes Minute Motion 96- 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Planning Commission meetings of December 12, 1995, an( December 19, 1995. COMMISSIONER ITEMS 1. Discussion regarding the League of California Cities Conference 2. Discussion regarding the Joint Meeting with the City Council 3. Commissioner report of the City Council meeting of January 2, 1996 4. Department update ADJOURNMENT STUDY SESSION 4:00 P.M. All agenda items. PC/AGENDA PH #1 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: JANUARY 9, 1996 REQUEST: TT 24890 - APPROVAL OF A THIRD ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR PHASE 9 OF TENTATIVE TRACT 24890 TO CREATE 37 LOTS CONSISTING OF 3 SINGLE FAMILY, 34 DUPLEX, AND 5 LETTERED LOTS ON 10 ACRES WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN 85-006 LOCATION: NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 52ND AVENUE AND JEFFERSON STREET IN OAK TREE WEST PROJECT. APPLICANT: KSL RECREATION CORPORATION, INC. OWNER: KSL LAND COMPANY, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN ASSESSED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN 85-006 OF WHICH THIS TRACT IS A PART. THEREFORE, NO FURTHER REVIEW IS DEEMED NECESSARY. THIS PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES ESTABLISHED AT THE TIME OF SPECIFIC PLAN 85-006 APPROVAL AND SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (3 TO 5 DWELLINGS PER ACRE) ZONING/SPECIFIC PLAN: R-2 (MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS) BACKGROUND: This request was originally advertised and scheduled for the December 12, 1995, Planning Commission meeting, however, no public hearings were held due to the lack of a quorum. The request was readvertised for the January 9, 1996, meeting. PCSTLM.001 The applicant is requesting a third time extension for the last phase, Phase 9, of Tract Map 24890. Phase 9 is located along the northern perimeter of the tract (Attachment 1). The City Council, at their meeting of October 17, 1989, approved Tentative Tract 24890 to construct 377 detached custom single family dwellings and 188 duplex units. This tract is in the northern part of the Oak Tree West Specific Plan, as Specific Plan 85-006. The Citrus Golf Course runs through the tract. The unit types consist of 3 custom single family lots, 34 production units (duplex) lots and 5 lettered lots. This will be the third one-year extension for this project. Up to three one-year time extensions are allowed according to the Subdivision Ordinance. The first one-year extension of time was granted by the City Council at their meeting of October 21, 1991. No progress in recordation of the final map for the last phase had occurred at that time. A request for a second time extension was approved by the City Council on October 20, 1992, for the same reason. Senate Bill 428 provided for an automatic two-year time extension due to depressed State-wide economic considerations. Thus, a third one-year time extension did not need to be applied for until October 13, 1995. If a third and final time extension is granted for this map, the applicant would have until October 17, 1996 to record the balance of the tract. If this portion of the tract is not recorded by that date, the applicant will then have to reapply for approval of that portion of the tentative map. Oak Tree West Specific Plan consists of 404 acres divided into 564 residential lots and 93 miscellaneous lots. Also included to the south is a golf course, golf clubhouse, recreation, offices, private streets, landscaping, and a golf maintenance building. ANALYSIS: The Public Works Department requests the addition of two new conditions, No. 51 and 52. Condition # 51 formalizes an agreement between the City and the applicant concerning the timing and sequence of development of the perimeter wall and landscaping improvements. Condition #52 requires that illegally placed concrete flatwork and a golf cart gate be officially approved by the City or removed. In order to ensure compliance, the condition states that no building permits or Certificates of Occupancy will be issued within the development until this issue is resolved. The Coachella Valley Water District is the only responsible agency to submit comments for this time extension. FINDINGS: Findings for justification of a recommendation for approval of the third one year time extension for this tentative tract map can be made and are as follows: Tentative Tract 24890, as conditionally approved, is consistent with the goals, policies, and intent of the La Quinta General Plan for land use density, the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and the Oak Tree West Specific Plan, and the La Quinta Municipal Code, in that the housing types are characterized by one story single family detached and attached units. PCSTLM.001 2. That the design of the Tentative Tract 24890 will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to the wildlife habitat as there is no natural habitat areas remaining on the project site. That the proposed subdivision, as conditionally approved, will be developed with adequate sewer, water, drainage, and other utility systems, and therefore, it is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 4. That the proposed Tentative Tract 24890, as conditioned, will provide for adequate maintenance of all common areas and facilities, including the internal private street system, stormwater retention areas, and common landscaped areas. That the design of Tentative Tract 24890 will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through the project, since alternate easements for access and for use will be previously acquired by the public. 6. That general impacts from the proposed tract were considered with the Master Environmental Assessment prepared and adopted in conjunction with the La Quinta General Plan, and were further considered during preparation of Environmental Assessment for Specific Plan 85-006. 7. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems as the project is designed to meet current health and safety codes and requirements concerning circulation, fire protection, and domestic water and sewer infrastructure. By adoption of attached Planning Commission Resolution 95- , recommend to the City Council approval of the third one year time extension for Phase 9 of Tentative Tract 24890. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Letter of request 3. Agency Comments 4. Tentative Tract 24890 (large plans - Commissioners only) 5. Draft Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ PCSTLM.001 Attachment 6 LOCATION c ...� e a� t , 1 , NORTH SCALE: Attachment 2 RECREATION CORPORATION October 12, 1995 Mr. Jerry Herman Director of Planning and Development CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 RE: Extension of Time for Tentative Tract 24-890 Dear Mr. Herman: OCT 13 1995 CITY OF LA OUINTA KMNING DEPARTMENT T Please accept this application package for a one (1) year extension of time for Tentative Tract 24-890 which is currently scheduled to expire on October 17, 1995. This package provided includes: 1. Fee Check of $75.00 2. 25 Folded copies of the Tentative Tract Map 24-890 3. Signed Application Form (provided by the Planning Department) Please note that Mailing Labels for the required 300' noticing radius surrounding the tract are being prepared by Fidelity Title Company and will be delivered to the Planning Department as a supplement to tiros application upon receipt by our office. Thank you for your attention to the processing of this valued extension of time for Tentative Tract 24-890. If additional information or assistance can be provided prior to the delivery of the mailing labels, feel free to call me at (619) 564-1088 for discussion. Respectfully, S. CHEVIS HOSEA Director of Real Estate SCH/jb Attachments 56-140 PGA Boulevard • La Quirta, California 92253 • (619) 564-1088 • Fax (619) 564-4880 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: T4ht 4 4 Qu&& MEMORANDUM Community Development Department David M. Cosper Public Works Director/City Engineer November 2, 1995 Tentative Tract 24890 - Time Extension #3 Attachment N n V PLAND ='1id The Public Works Department recommends the following conditions be placed on the subject time extension: 1. Per J.M. Peters' proposal in the letter dated May 18, 1993 (slightly modified in December 12, 1994 letter), perimeter wall and landscaping improvements shall be constructed in the following timing and sequence: A. When one third of the perimeter improvements are complete, the first 93 of 546 homes will be permitted for construction. B. When two thirds of of the perimeter improvements are complete, the next 107 of 546 (units 94 -200) will be permitted for construction. C. Perimeter improvements shall be complete and accepted by the City prior to issuance of more than a total of 200 building permits within the development. The sequence of improvements shall be as approved by the City. Perimeter wall along the north boundary of the development, constructed subsequent to the June 16, 1993 agreement between J.M. Peters, Co. and the City Public Works Department, was not an approved increment in scheduling of perimeter improvements and shall not be included in the total of improvements completed for the purposes of this condition until approved by the Public Works Director. 2. Prior to May 1, 1996, the applicant shall obtain City approval for, or shall remove, the golf cart gate and concrete flatwork illegally constructed along the Park Avenue perimeter wall. After May 1, 1996, no building permits or certificates of occupancy will be issued within the development until this issue has been resolved. FB/fb A • CV � DATE: F`y OF Tt►�� FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X City Manager Public Works Department LBuilding & Safety A Parks & Recreation Fire Marshal _Chamber of Commerce _Imperial Irrigation District _Southern California Gas _Desert Sands School District _CV Unified School District ICV Water District Riverside County: OlT 2 E, 1995 Waste Management _Princimjl� r - Current _US Postal Service _Principal Planner - Advan _General Telephone Associate Planner - —Colony Cable Curr� /Advan._ _Sunline Transit Planning Manager _Caltrans (District II) mscommunity Development ,_Agricultural Commission CV Archaeological Society _BIA - Desert Council Cit of Ind ^ ndian Wells _CV Mountain Conservancy —CV Recreation & Parks I( Sheriff's Department %Planning Department i !"'' � �•" :� •' ram. !' �. ! ^ter•-.�.:.._ " ��>�� `fr-,r �; is � � •� 1 !L�h LA QUINTA CASE NO(S): / ry *z �i ve— /ra & f �.1 �G r-i t'ii <iCit '' � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: (i fr c4 S C 'e uen- 1 / I' / 'G /' )L- e The City of La Quints Development Review Committee is conducting an initial environmental study pursuant to the California Environmej Quality Act (CEQA) for the above referenced project(s). Attached is the information submitted by the project proponent. Your comments are requested with respect to: 1. Physical impacts the project presents on public resources, facilities, and/or services. 2. Recommended conditions: a) that you or your agency believe would mitigate any potential adverse effects; b) or should appl] the project design; c) or improvements to satisfy other regulations and concerns which your agency is responsible; and 3. If you find that the identified impacts will have significant adverse effects on the environment which cannot be avoided throe conditions, please recommend the scope and focus of additional study(ies) which may be helpful. Please send your response by I (- a"7-95- You are invited to attend the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMM meeting at La Quinta City Hall: Date: 71-Z- 4 Time: Contact Person:Title: Comments made by:yo" 1� ,��o,,,, Title: ter: Phone: 3 - Agency/Division: f,i. /LG �ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AG_ ._Y 01STRIC.' COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (619) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E. LEVY, GENERAL MANAGER -CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON. SECRETARY JOHN W. McFADDEN OWEN MCCOOK ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M. NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL. ATTORNEYS THEODORE J. FISH November 21, 1995 Planning Commission City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Gentlemen: File: 0163.1 Subject: Tentative Tract No. 24890, Portion of. the Northwest Quarter of Section 5,_. Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone X on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. Plans for grading, landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the district for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Dan Farris, principal stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager -Chief Engineer RL:jl/sc2/tt24890 cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, PRESENTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A THIRD TIME EXTENSION OF THE UNRECORDED PORTION OF TENTATIVE TRACT 24890 TO CREATE 37 LOTS WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN 85-006 CASE NO. TT 24890 - KSL RECREATION CORPORATION, INC. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 9th day of January, 1996, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing continued from the 12th day of December, 1995, to consider the request of KSL Recreation Corporation, Inc. to grant a third time extension for the unrecorded portion of Tentative Tract 24890 to create a total of 37 lots, generally located at the northwest corner of the intersection of 52nd Avenue and Jefferson Street, more generally described as: POTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST. SBBM. WHEREAS, said Tentative Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (County of Riverside, Resolution 82-213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance 5), in that the Community Development Director determined that this Tentative Tract Map has previously been assessed during consideration of Specific Plan 85-006; and, WHEREAS, mitigation of various physical impacts have been identified and incorporated into the approval conditions for Tentative Tract 24890 and Specific Plan 85-006, thereby requiring that monitoring of those mitigation measures be undertaken to assure compliance with them; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify the recommendation for approval of a third time extension of said Tentative Tract Map: That Tentative Tract 24890, as conditionally approved, is consistent with the goals, policies, and intent of the La Quinta General Plan for land use density, the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and the Oak Tree West Specific Plan, and the La Quinta Municipal Code, in that the housing types are characterized by one story single family detached and attached units. 2. That the design of the Tentative Tract 24890 will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to the wildlife habitat as there is no natural habitat areas remaining on the project site. Planning Commission Resolution 95- That the proposed subdivision, as conditionally approved, will be developed with adequate sewer, water, drainage, and other utility systems, and, therefore, is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 4. That the proposed Tentative Tract 24890, as conditioned, will provide for adequate maintenance of all common areas and facilities, including the internal private street system, stormwater retention areas, and common landscaped areas. 5. That the design of Tentative Tract 24890 will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through the project, since alternate easements for access and for use have been previously acquired by the public. 6. That general impacts from the proposed tract were considered within the Master Environmental Assessment prepared and adopted in conjunction with the La Quinta General Plan, and were further considered during the preparation of an environmental assessment for Specific Plan 85-006. 7. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems as the project is designed to meet current health and safety codes and requirements concerning circulation, fire protection, and domestic water and sewer infrastructure. WHEREAS, in the review of this time extension for Tentative Tract 24890, the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action of the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing the needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of La Quinta and its environs with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend approval of a third time extension for the subject Tentative Tract Map 24890 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this 9th day of January, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: Planning Commission Resolution 95- AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California RESOPC.170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 95- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 24890-2, AMENDMENT #1, TIME EXTENSION #3 JANUARY 9,1996 * Added by City Council on October 17, 1989 * * Amended by City Council on October 17, 1989 *** The 60-foot dimension may be reduced to 55-feet pending the outcome of proposed General Plan Amendment. + Amended by Planning Commission on April 27, 1995 ++ Added by Planning Commission on January 9, 1996 GENERAL +l . Tentative Tract Map 24890-2 shall comply with the requirements and standards of the State Subdivision Map Act and the City of La Quinta Land Division Ordinance, unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. +2. Design and improvement of Tentative Tract 24890-2 shall be in substantial conformance with Exhibit A, except where there are conflicts between these conditions and said Exhibit, these condition(s) shall take precedence. 3. This Tentative Tract Map approval shall expire two years after the original date of approval by the La Quinta City Council, unless approved for extension pursuant to the City of La Quinta Land Division Ordinance. 4. All applicable requirements and conditions of Specific Plan 85-006, as amended shall be met as stipulated in City Council Resolution 89-76 (or current resolution). 5. Existing power poles shall be undergrounded as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code Section 13.28.090. 6. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the appropriate Planning approval shall be secured prior to establishing any of the following uses: a. Temporary construction facilities. b. Sales facilities and/or model homes, including their appurtenant signage. (Model home unit permits will not be issued until the final map has been recorded.) C. Access gates and/or guardhouses. d. On -site advertising/construction signs. CONAPRVL.353 Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 ++7. Prior to final map approval, the Applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department for review and approval a plan (or plans) showing the following: a. Landscaping, including plant types, sizes, spacing, locations, and irrigation system for all landscape buffer and common areas including gates. Desert or native plant species and drought -resistant planting materials shall be incorporated into the landscape plan. b. Location and design detail of any proposed and/or required walls. C. Exterior lighting plan, in conformance with any future "Dark Sky" Ordinance emphasizing minimization of light and glare impacts to surrounding properties. d. A schedule of completion shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for items a, b and c. 8. Prior to building permit approval(s), the subdivider shall submit criteria to be used for landscaping of all individual lot front yards. At a minimum, the criteria shall provide for three 15-gallon trees on corner lots, as well as an irrigation system and suitable ground cover. ++9. The subdivider shall make provisions for maintenance of all landscape buffer common areas, recreation areas, and storm water retention areas via one of the following methods prior to final map approval: a. Subdivider shall consent to the formation of a maintenance district under Chapter 26 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Streets and Highways Code, Section 5820 et seq.) of the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code 22600 et seq.) to implement maintenance of all improved landscape buffer and storm water retention areas. It is understood and agreed that the developer/applicant shall pay all costs of maintenance for said improved areas until such time as tax revenues are received from assessment of the real property. b. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department a Management and Maintenance Agreement, to be entered into with the unit/lot owners of this land division, in order to insure common areas and facilities will be maintained. An unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs. The association shall have the right to lien the property of any owners who default in the payment of their assessments. CONAPRVL.353 2 Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 +10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit/building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: ■ City Fire Marshall ■ City of La Quinta ■ Public Works Department ■ Community Development Department ■ Coachella Valley Water District ■ Desert Sands Unified School District ■ Imperial Irrigation District Evidence of said permits or clearances from the abovementioned agencies shall be presented to the Building & Safety Department at the time of the application for any permit for any use contemplated by this approval. ++11. Prior to the issuance of any grading, building, or other development permit or final inspection, the applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director demonstrating compliance with those Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures of Tentative Tract 24890 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of any permits/final inspections. The Community Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. Said inspection or monitoring may be accomplished by consultant(s) at the discretion of the Community Development Director, and all costs associated shall be borne by the applicant/developer. 12. Lots that exceed 2'/2 depth times width ratio, shall be provided with 25-foot front yard setback. ** 13. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be subject to approval of GPA No. 89-026, SP 85-006 (Amendment), and CZ 89-045, by the City Council. ++14. Street name proposals shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to recordation of any portion of the final map. Street name signs shall be furnished and installed by the developer in accordance with standards of the City Engineer. Signage type and design shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department and the Public Works Department. ++15. Minimum landscaped setbacks adjacent to public streets as stipulated in Specific Plan 85-006 (amended), shall be required. Design of the setbacks shall be approved by the Community Development Department. Setback shall be measured from ultimate right-of-way lines. CONAPRVI-353 3 Planning Commission Resolution 95 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 a. The minimum setback may be modified to an "average" if a meandering or curvilinear wall design is used. b. The parkway setback area(s) shall be established as (a) separate common lot(s) and be maintained as set forth in Condition #9, unless an alternate method is approved by the Community Development Department. 16. Exceptions to La Quinta Subdivision Ordinance Sections 13.12.050, Street Alignment and 13.12.080-c lots, is hereby approved. PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES: 17. Applicant shall comply with the following conditions of the City Fire Marshal: a. Schedule A fire protection approved Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2'/2" x 2'/2") shall be located one at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 2500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi. b. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. C. Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant/developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department". d. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. e. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant/developer shall provide alternate accesses as approved by the County Fire Department. 1). Exterior accesses issues. 2). Cul de sac secondary access issue. CONAPRVL.353 4 Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 f. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio -controlled override system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 12-feet, with a minimum vertical clearance of 13-feet 6-inches. g. Medians and islands may require additional setbacks to allow Fire Department access. 18. All requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District shall be met. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 19. Prior to transmittal of the final map to the City Council by the City Public Works Department, any existing structures which are to be removed from the property shall have been removed or there shall be an agreement for the removal which shall be secured by a faithful performance bond in a form satisfactory to the City and granting the City the right to cause any such structures to be removed. 20. An encroachment permit for work in any abutting local jurisdiction shall be secured prior to constructing or joining improvements. 21. The applicant shall pay the required processing, plan checking and inspection fees as are current at the time the work is being accomplished by City personnel or subcontractors for the Community Development, Building, or Engineering Divisions. 22. The applicant acknowledges that the City is considering a City-wide Landscaping and Lighting District and by recording a subdivision map agrees to be included in the district. Any assessments will be done on a benefit basis as required by law. 23. All traffic, circulation, and drainage conditions placed on Specific Plan 85-006 shall apply except where specifically modified by the conditions for this tentative subdivision map. 24. Applicant shall post security for street improvements in the right-of-way contiguous to the subdivision as follows: CONAPRVL.353 Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 Jefferson Street - '/2 width plus 1 land + raised landscaped median 52nd Avenue - '/2 width plus 1 land + raised landscaped median Calle Rondo - '/2 width Calle Tampico - '/2 width Park Avenue - 'h width 25. The applicant shall have prepared street improvement plans (for public and private streets) that are prepared by a registered civil engineer. Street improvements, including traffic signs and markings, and raised median islands (if required by the City General Plan) shall conform to City standards as determined by the City Engineer and adopted by the La Quinta Municipal Code (3-inch AC over 4-inch Class 2 base minimum, for residential streets). Street design shall take into account the subgrade soil strength, the anticipated traffic loading, and street design life. 26. A common area lot shall be established for that area between the tract perimeter wall and street right-of-way for Jefferson Street, 52nd Avenue, Calle Rondo, Calle Tampico, and Park Avenue streets. Landscaped maintenance responsibility of the total common lot and street landscape parkway shall be the responsibility of the development. 27. The applicant shall have a grading plan that is prepared by a registered civil engineer, who will be required to certify that the constructed conditions at the rough grade stage are as per the approved plans and grading permit. This is required prior to issuance of building permits. Certification at the final grade stage and verification of pad elevations is also required prior to final approval of grading construction. 28. The developer of this subdivision shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to CVWD's Water Management Program. 29. A thorough preliminary engineering geological and soils engineering investigation shall be done and the report submitted for review along with the grading plan. The reports recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and/or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. Pursuant to Section 11568 of the Business and Professions Code, the soils report certification shall be indicated on the final subdivision map. 30. The developer of this subdivision of land shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of the final map without the approval of the City Engineer. CONAPRVL.353 6 Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 31. Drainage disposal facilities shall be provided as required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of the City Master Plan of Drainage, including payment of any drainage fees required therewith. 32. All utilities will be installed and trenches compacted to City standards prior to construction of any streets. The soils engineer shall provide the necessary compaction test reports for review by the City Engineer. 33. The applicant shall post security equivalent to the proportional share designated, and may obtain some reimbursement from the City in a manner approved by the City Council for traffics signals, in accordance with the following table. Initial Portion Eligible Posting for Requirement Reimbursement Jefferson @ 50th Avenue 50% 37.5% Jefferson @ Project Entrance 100% None Jefferson @ 52nd Avenue 50% 25% Avenue 52 @ Project Entrance 100% 50% 34. Applicant shall dedicate all necessary public street right-of-way and utility easements for the following streets: Jefferson 60' half -width 52nd Avenue 120' full -width (see note) Calle Rondo 30' half -width and suitable conforms Calle Tampico 30' half -width and suitable conforms Park Avenue 30' half -width and suitable conforms NOTE: The 120' figure may be reduce to 100' pending the outcome of the proposed General Plan Amendment. 35. Applicant shall record permanent public access easement on all lots created in the subdivision for private streets. **36. In order to improve access between Washington Street and this subdivision for traffic with trip ends in the subdivision, and to provide for orderly development along 52nd Avenue east of Washington Street to the eastern edge of Tract Map 24889, the applicant shall make every CONAPRVL.353 7 Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ Conditions oFApproval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 effort to obtain a 60-foot-wide easement for public street purposes from the adjoining property owner to the west. As a minimum, an interim two-lane paved facility shall be concurrently constructed in the easement that joins Washington Street when the other 52nd Avenue improvements are installed. The interim facility shall be constructed in a manner that will permit incorporation into the ultimate street improvement with minimal adaptation. The applicant may seek reimbursement for the improvements for that section of 52nd Avenue east of Washington Street to the western edge of Tract 24890 in the following manner. 1. Prior to January 1, 1992 the applicant shall seek direct reimbursement, from the developer of the property that provides the easement. 2. After January 1, 1992, the applicant may seek reimbursement from the City consistent with any policy or program in existence at that time. It shall be understood by all parties involved in providing the easement and subsequent interim improvement that the City intends to condition the future development of the property adjoining Tract 24890 to affect reimbursement for costs relevant to same incurred by the applicant or City whichever is carrying the cost at the time. If the applicant is unable to obtain the easement, the following condition shall apply: a. The intersection of "new" 52nd Avenue with "old" 52nd Avenue shall be configured in a manner that the two intersect at 90 degree angles. The curve on "new" 52nd Avenue that leads into the intersection shall have a minimum radius. b. In addition to the right-of-way required for the ultimate alignment of 52nd Avenue, the applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way as needed, to accommodate the interim intersection configuration. C. Traffic signals shall be installed when traffic counts warrant the need, as determined in accordance with the collective conditions of approval for this tract. The applicant shall be 100% responsible for the cost of the signals; the City will administer the design and installation. d. Although "nevi' 52nd Avenue shall be offered for dedication, it will not be accepted as a public street until the link to Washington Street is completed, and the other link CONAPRVI-353 Planning Commission Resolution 95-_ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 which is constructed under these collective Conditions of Approval has been determined by the City Engineer to be in a state of good repair. 37. The applicant shall enter into a license agreement with the City to provide for maintenance, liability insurance coverage, and other relevant concerns that may be identified, and as needed, for the tunnel that is proposed for placement under the pavement in the Jefferson Street right- of-way. The agreement, which will be subject to approval of appropriate City officials, will be prepared by the City at the applicant's expense prior to issuance of permits to construct tunnel. 38. Applicant shall provide street grades that are 0.3 5 percent or greater unless demonstrated by engineering design, and approved by the City Engineer, that drainage is adequate and the minimum gradient cannot be satisfactorily obtained. 39. Security posting requirements for the traffic signals may be staged in proportional increments commensurate with, and based on, the number of dwelling units in each successive development phase. The applicant shall provide traffic signal improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer, and install the signals when warranted pursuant to an annual warrant study of the intersections identified in Condition #33. The study shall be conducted by a qualified traffic engineer at the applicant's expense and submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 40. The applicant shall post security for private street improvements in the subdivision in amounts commensurate with, and as needed, to meet circulation and access requirements for each proposed phase of the subdivision development. The security shall be posted prior to recording of the subject phase of the final map. Installation of the secured improvements by the applicant shall occur prior to issuance of occupancy permits. 41. The applicant shall post security for all public street improvements prior to recording of the final subdivision map. 42. Installation of the secured public street improvements by the applicant shall occur and may be staged in a manner commensurate with the development phasing of this subdivision, adjoining subdivisions and traffic needs, all as determined by the City Engineer. As a minimum, an interim two-lane paved facility shall be constructed concurrently with Phase I of the development in the 52nd Avenue right-of-way, and the easement required in Condition # 38 from Jefferson to Washington Streets. The interim improvement shall be constructed in a manner that will permit incorporation into the ultimate street improvement with minimal adaption. CONAPRVI-353 9 Planning Commission Resolution 95 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9,1996 43. The applicant may obtain some reimbursement from the City in a manner approved by City Council for the segment of 52nd Avenue constructed in the 60-foot wide easement between Washington Street and the westerly most boundary of Tract 24890. 44. The applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to all public streets except for selected private streets that may intersect 52nd Avenue and Jefferson Street at locations, and in a manner approved by the City Engineer. 45. Additional exceptions where vehicle access rights to public streets may be retained are as follows: 1) the golf course maintenance facility located adjacent to 52nd Avenue and Calle Rondo may enjoy direct access to 52nd Avenue and Calle Rondo (temporarily only, see Condition #50, but the 52nd Avenue access shall be right-turn-in/right-turn-out only); 2) the C.V.W.D. well site located adjacent to Calle Rondo and Calle Tampico may enjoy direct access to either street, but not both; 3) gated emergency access to interior private streets from Jefferson Street and Park Avenue shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer and City Fire Marshal. 46. The applicant shall aesthetically enhance the outward appearance of the C.V.W.D. well site located adjacent to Calle Rondo and Calle Tampico, and the golf course maintenance facility located adjacent to Calle Rondo and 52nd Avenue. Specific improvements shall include: 1) continuation of the sound wall and landscaping in the setback area along the Calle Rondo, Calle Tampico, and 52nd Avenue frontages; 2) a paved driveway at the access point; 3) an aesthetically attractive sight restricted gate. 47. The applicant shall provide a 20-foot wide and a 10-foot wide landscaped setback lot respectively, on the 52nd Avenue and Calle Rondo frontages adjacent to the golf course maintenance facility. 48. Along Jefferson Street where golf course abuts proposed perimeter wall, decorative wrought iron or steel tube fencing shall be used to allow views into project, if in conformance with acoustical study (as required by Specific Plan 850996, as amended). *49. Custom home lots Numbers 487-505 and 530-554 shall be permitted to be a maximum 28- feet in height within one story. *50. Existing maintenance building access to Calle Rondo shall be permanently eliminated at the time 52 Avenue is realigned, as required by Condition # 11 of Plot Plan 86-285. CONAPRVL.353 10 Planning Commission Resolution 95-__ Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 24890-2, Amendment # 1, Time Extension #3 January 9, 1996 ++51. Per J. M. Peters' proposal in the letter dated May 18, 1993 (slightly modified in December 12, 1994 letter), the perimeter wall and landscaping improvements shall be constructed in the following timing and sequence: a. When one third of the perimeter improvements are complete, the first 93 of 546 homes will be permitted for construction. b. When two thirds of the perimeter improvements are complete, the next 107 of 546 (units 94-200) will be permitted for construction. C. Perimeter improvements shall be complete and accepted by the City prior to issuance of more than a total of 200 building permits within the development. The sequence of improvements shall be as approved by the City. Perimeter wall along the north boundary of the development, constructed subsequent to the June 16, 1993 agreement between. J.M. Peters, Co. and the City Public Works Department, was not an approved increment in scheduling of perimeter improvements and shall not be included in the total of improvements completed for the purposes of this condition until approved by the Public Works Director. ++52. Prior to May 1, 1996, the applicant shall obtain City approval for, or shall remove, the golf cart gate and concrete flatwork illegally constructed along the Park Avenue perimeter wall. After May 1, 1996, no building permits or Certificates of Occupancy will be issued within the development until this issue has been resolved. CONAPRVI-353 11 PH #2 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JANUARY 9, 1996 CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26444 (TIME EXTENSION) REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION (EXTENSION # 2) FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF 32 ACRES INTO 98 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND OTHER AMENITY LOTS LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: ENGINEER: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: GENERAL PLAN: ZONING: STAFFRPT.54 NORTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 53 (ATTACHMENT 1) LA QUINTA 33, A MINNESOTA PARTNERSHIP SAME AS APPLICANT WARNER ENGINEERING INC. (MR. MICHAEL A. SMITH) THE CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 4, 1990, ADOPTED A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR 90-170 WHICH WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT IN 1990. BASED UPON THIS ASSESSMENT, THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT BASED ON MITIGATION MEASURES IMPOSED. THEREFORE, NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS DEEMED NECESSARY. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH RURAL RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY (MAX. 3 DU./AC.) R-1 (ONE FAMILY DWELLING) The site is on the east side of Jefferson Street, north of 53rd Avenue. The All American Canal runs diagonally adjacent to the northwest corner of the property. This site is vacant. The proposed tract surrounds an existing plant nursery, fronting on Jefferson Street, but is not part of this development request. The City annexed this site and adjacent properties into the City (Annexation 5) in January, 1991. In July 1990, the La Quinta Estate Partnership filed the original tentative tract map request to subdivide approximately 32 acres into 98 single family lots. The map was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Commission on November 27, 1990 and approved by the Council on December 4, 1990 under Resolution 90-91. The map was approved for a two-year period with conditions. A copy of the original tentative map exhibit is attached (Attachment 2). Before the map's expiration date on December 4, 1992, the previous owner filed a request for a one year extension. Both the Commission and Council approved the first extension request and established December 4, 1993, as the new expiration date for this application. Minor changes to the original conditions were made. In 1993, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill 428 that permitted all active tentative maps two additional years without any penalties to the provisions outlined in the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Map Act. The map's expiration was therefore extended to December 4, 1995, unless extended by Commission and Council. The properties around this area are generally zoned for residential purposes (i.e., R-1 or R-2). However, the property to the north, across the All American Canal, is zoned CPS Commercial. Although the properties in the area are vacant, many properties have approved development plans. The Vista Santa Rosa Specific Plan (90-020), to the northeast and east, is approved for 850 single family homes on 273 acres. To the west (across Jefferson Street) is Specific Plan 85-006 (Oak Tree West), a master planned golf course/housing development of 2,245 units on 1,025 acres. The approved tentative tract map allows single family lots on private streets that range in size from 8,613 to 18,750 square feet. The original Conditions of Approval require the map to be revised, moving the Jefferson Street access point north of the existing nursery site. A second access point is on 53rd Avenue. A private retention basin is shown at the southeast corner of the project, abutting 53rd Avenue. The applicant is required to provide a primary access street on 53rd Avenue to assure two points of access for the future residents. STAFFRPT.54 On October 17, 1995, staff accepted the application request for a one year time extension for the subdivision map. The applicant has revised the map to conform with the original Conditions of Approval. The changes are listed below: 1. Jefferson Street access has been moved north of its original location with only emergency access proposed; 2. 53rd Avenue will provide primary access for the project; 3. Phased mapping is proposed (i.e., five phases); 4. Street Lots "N", "M" and "G" will provide access to the nursery site if they develop the property with houses in the future.; and, 5. A CVWD well site is located along 53rd Avenue. The case was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on December 30, 1995. All property owners within 500-feet of the affected area were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required. No negative comments have been received. Staff mailed a copy of the applicant's initial request to all public agencies on November 1, 1995. We received no negative comments. All other comments have been incorporated into the attached draft conditions of approval. Environmental Assessment 90-170 was prepared for this case during its original review and approval in 1990. No additional environmental consideration is warranted for a time extension request pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act statutes. As required, Mestre Greve Associates prepared a preliminary noise study for this project on February 20, 1991. The applicant's representative recently provided a copy of the study to staff. STAFFRPT.54 Issue 1 - General Plan Consistency The City updated the General Plan in 1992. As part of the update, the General Plan designates this site as Low Density Residential (2-4 dwellings per acre) with a Rural Residential Overlay. A copy of the RRO provisions is attached (Attachments 3 and 4). The RRO provisions mandate that the maximum density for the project not exceed three (3) dwgllina units per acre in addition to design standards (e.g., enhanced setbacks, rural fencing, rural streets, etc.). The parcel is approximately 31.5 net acres which permits only 94 single family lots where they propose 98 lots. Therefore, the tract is inconsistent with the General Plan. Staff has added a condition (Condition 59) of approval requiring revising the tract map according to Policy 2-1.2.2 (Rural Residential Overlay) of the General Plan. As required, the applicant prepared a noise study for their project in February 1991, because the project is next to a major arterial thoroughfare. The study states that an eight (8) foot high sound barrier structure shall be built to mitigate vehicle noise from Jefferson Street. The barrier can be a solid masonry wall, a solid wall with landscape mounding, or other combinations as outlined in the study. The original study was prepared based on Jefferson Street carrying approximately 32,000 vehicles per day (i.e., volume based on City build -out). However, based on the 1992 General Plan Update, we now project Jefferson Street to carry more than 42,000 vehicles per day. This change requires an update to the original study. Issue 2 - Tract Design/Improvements Emergency access to this subdivision will be from Street Lot "M" to Jefferson Street, a major arterial street (120' r-o-w) on the west side of the tract. Primary access is to 53rd Avenue, a collector street (64-74' r-o-w) on the south side of the tract. All interior streets will be a minimum of 37-feet wide and provide access to all house sites. They propose no flag or irregular lots. Urban improvements are required for this project that include streets and other infrastructure improvements necessary for single family development. The recommended conditions will insure that all on -site work is consistent with City standards. Issue 3 - Health and Safety The proposed Conditions of Approval require all the necessary infrastructure improvements. These include water, sewer, streets, and other necessary improvements. Electric services will be undergrounded and they will meet all requirements of the local service agencies (gas, electric, water, etc. ). STAFFRPT.54 Fire safety emergency hazards will be mitigated because the map provides two permanent points of access. One point of access will be allowed until they build out one-third of the project (See Condition 21). CONCLUSION: This revised subdivision map request is consistent with all City Codes provided we impose the recommended Conditions of Approval. No physical constraints prevent the development of the site as planned. Findings for approval are included in the attached draft Resolution. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96- , recommending to City Council approval of the second one year time extension for Tentative Tract Map 26444 (Amendment 1, 2nd Time Extension). Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. 1990 Map Exhibit (Reduced) 3. RRO Provisions 4. General Plan Policy STAFFRPT.54 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A SECOND ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 26444 (AMENDMENT 1) TO ALLOW A 94-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND SALES SUBDIVISION ON APPROXIMATELY 31.5 ACRES CASE NO.: TTM 26444 (AMENDMENT 1, 2ND TIME EXTENSION) APPLICANT: LA QUINTA 33, A MINNESOTA PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 9th day of January, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of La Quinta 33, a Minnesota Partnership, for a one year extension and map amendment of a previously approved 98 lot single family subdivision of 31.5 acres, generally on the west side of Jefferson Street, north of 53rd Avenue, more particularly described as: BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTH % OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (APN: 769-290-008, 010) WHEREAS, said Tentative Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that the Community Development Director has determined that the original environmental assessment approved in 1990, is still valid and binding on this development request. Therefore, no additional environmental review is warranted; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following Mandatory Findings of approval to justify the recommendation for approval of said Tentative Tract Map 26444 (Amendment 1, 2nd Time Extension): A. The proposed map or vesting map is consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan and any applicable specific plans. The project is in the Rural Residential Overlay of the 1992 General Plan Update; therefore, all provisions of Policies 2-1.2.1 through 2-1.2.3 shall be met. Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General Plan provided conditions contained herein are required to ensure among other things consistency with the General Plan and mitigation of environmental consequences pursuant to Environmental Assessment 90-170. The site is zoned R-1 (One Family Dwelling) which permits single family developments. All plans for single family homes shall be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code (e.g., specifically Chapter 9.32 et.seq.) in effect at the time building permits are acquired. The development of the project, as conditioned, will be compatible with the surrounding area. xSs0pC.140/conaprv1.352 Resolution 96- B. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and any applicable specific plans. All streets and improvements in the project conform to City standards of the General Plan and Subdivision Ordinance as designed. All streets will be private. Access for the single family lots will be provided from 53rd Avenue, a collector street. Secondary emergency access is provided on Jefferson Street as conditioned. The density and design standards will comply with the Rural Residential Overlay as designated by General Plan Policies 2-1.2.1, 2-1.2.2 and 2-1.2.3. C. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed land division as approved in 1990. The original development plan will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to fish or wildlife, or their habitat because mitigation measures have been required. Before on -site grading begins, the applicant under EA 90-170 shall employ a qualified archaeologist and paleontologist to conduct on -site research and review for prehistoric remains. These findings shall be submitted, in report form, to staff. The consultant's report shall indicate his, or her, findings and convey any important information about the site or its development. Monitoring shall be required during site grading work, if deemed necessary. The redesign of the subdivision, as conditionally approved, will not cause serious public health problems because urban improvements will be installed based on City, State, and Federal requirements. D. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The revised design of the subdivision, as conditionally approved, will not cause serious public health problems because they will install urban improvements based on City, State, and Federal requirements. Noise impacts from existing and future road noise on Jefferson Street shall be analyzed and mitigation measures shall be employed to reduce exterior noise for those houses along this major arterial street to levels consistent with Table EH-1 of Chapter 8 of the General Plan (Environmental Hazards Element). The applicant's preliminary noise study is required to be updated to conform with our 1992 standards, which require noise to be less than 60 dB CNEL in outdoor areas (45 dB or less for interior areas). E. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. RPsorc.l4o/conaprv1.352 Resolution 96- The proposed private streets will serve all single family lots. All required public easements will provide access to the site or support necessary infrastructure improvements. The future homeowners' association will maintain the private retention basin located at the southeast corner of the site. A CVWD well site will also be required. WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Tract Map, the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of La Quinta and its environs with available fiscal and environmental resources; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby reconfirm the conclusions of Environmental Assessment 90-170 as approved in 1990; 3. That it does now recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map 26444 (Amendment 1, Second Time Extension) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this 9th day of January, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California REsoPc.140/conaprv1.352 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 26444 (AMENDMENT 1) - SECOND TIME EXTENSION JANUARY 9, 1996 1. Tentative Tract Map 26444 (Amendment 1), shall comply with the requirements and standards of the State Subdivision Map Act and the City of La Quinta Subdivision Ordinance, unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. 2. This tentative tract map approval shall expire on December 4, 1996, unless approved for extension pursuant to the City of La Quinta Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The tract layout shall comply with R-1 zoning requirements and Policy 2-1.2.3 of the City's General Plan. 4. Minimum landscaped setback shall be provided on Jefferson Street (20 feet) and 53rd Avenue (10 feet). Setback shall be measured from ultimate right-of-way line. 5. Prior to any site disturbance being permitted, including preliminary site work and/or archaeological investigation, the project developer shall submit and have approved a Fugitive Dust Control Plan (FDCP), in accordance with Chapter 6.16 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. The plan shall define all areas proposed for development and shall indicate time lines for any phasing of the project, and shall establish standards for comprehensive control of both anthropogenic and natural creation of airborne dust due to development activities on site. Phased projects must prepare a plan that addresses control measures over the entire build out of the project, such as for disturbed lands pending future development. 6. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a condition so as to prevent a dust and blowsand nuisance and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures as approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 7. The subdivider shall make provisions for maintenance of all landscape buffer and storm water retention areas prior to final map approval as follows: a. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department a Management and Maintenance Agreement, to be entered into with the unit/lot owners of this land division, in order to insure common areas and facilities will be maintained, with an unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units CONAPRVL.354 1 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 for reasonable maintenance costs. The association shall have the right to lien the property of any owners who default in the payment of their assessments. The common facilities to be maintained are as follows: (1) Storm water retention system. (2) Twenty -foot perimeter parkway lot along Jefferson Street, and a 10 foot perimeter parkway along 53rd Avenue. (3) All common area landscaping. (4) All private streets, including all street medians. 8. A noise study shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer, to be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to final map approval. The study shall concentrate on noise impacts on the tract from perimeter arterial streets, and recommend alternative mitigation techniques based on the City's 1992 General Plan requirements. Recommendations of the study shall be incorporated into the tract design. The study shall consider use of building setbacks, engineering design, building orientation, noise barriers (terming, walls, and landscaping, etc.), and other techniques so as to avoid the isolated appearance given by walled developments. 9. If the tract is phased, tract phasing plans, including phasing of public improvements, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department and the Community Development Department prior to final map approval. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase unless a construction sequencing plan for that phase is approved by the City Engineer. 10. Applicant shall submit proposed street names with alternatives to the Community Development Department for approval prior to final map approval. 11. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Commission for review and approval a plan (or plans) showing the following: a. Landscaping, including plant types, sizes, spacing, locations, and irrigation system for all landscape buffer areas. Desert or native plant species and drought resistant planting materials shall be incorporated into the landscape plan. Along perimeter public parkways and medians lawn use shall be limited with no lawn adjacent to curb. No spray heads shall be used next to curbs. b. Location and design detail of any proposed and/or required walls. C. Exterior lighting plan, emphasizing minimization of light glare impacts to surrounding properties. CONAPRVL.354 2 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots, common retention basins and park facilities shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The plans and proposed landscaping improvements shall be in conformance with requirements of, and be signed by, the Community Development Director, the Director of Public Works, the Coachella Valley Water District, and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall insure that landscaping plans and utility plans are coordinated to provide visual screening of above -ground utility structures. 12. Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall submit landscape and irrigation plans to be used for landscaping of all individual lot front yards. At a minimum, the plans shall provide for two trees (five trees on a corner), shrubs, groundcover, and an irrigation system. 13. All perimeter walls that front onto a public, arterial street shall be decorative. 14. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: o City Fire Marshal o City of La Quinta Public Works Department o Community Development Department o Coachella Valley Water District o Coachella Valley Unified School District o Imperial Irrigation District o California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above -mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building and Safety Department at the time of the application for a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approvals and signatures on the plans. 15. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Infrastructure Fee Program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. CONAPRVL.354 3 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 16. All dwelling units within 150-feet of the ultimate right-of-way of Jefferson Street shall be limited to one story (maximum 22-feet high). This limitation shall be included in the CC & R's. 17. The appropriate approvals shall be secured prior to establishing any of the following uses: a. Temporary construction facilities. b. Sales facilities, including their appurtenant signage. C. On -site advertising/construction signs. 18. The developer shall construct landscaping (trees and lawn/groundcover) and irrigation systems for drainage retention basin(s) and perimeter areas. The applicant shall maintain the landscaped areas of the subdivision such as common lots, landscaped setbacks and retention basins until those areas have been approved by the City and accepted for maintenance by the Homeowners' Association. 19. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director demonstrating compliance with those Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures of Tentative Tract 26444 and Environmental Assessment 90-170, which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director demonstrating compliance with those Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures of Environmental Assessment 90-170 and Tentative 'Tract 26444, which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit. Prior to final building inspection approval, the applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director demonstrating compliance with all remaining Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures of Environmental Assessment 90-170 and Tentative Tract 26444. The Community Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. 20. Design of entrance(s) and gate(s) shall be approved by the Public Works & Community Development Departments prior to approval of final map by City Council. 21. Prior to approval of building permit final for 30th dwelling unit, secondary tract access shall be provided to satisfaction of the City. 22. Prior to or concurrent with final map recordation, an easement allowing access to the "not a part" cactus nursery site shall be recorded to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. CONAPRVL.354 4 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 23. Lot depth to width ratio shall not exceed 2 1/2 to 1 except for those lots on Street Lot "U". 24. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall retain a professionally qualified archaeologist to conduct a field reconnaissance survey and record search of the project site. A report of the result of the survey shall be submitted to the Community Development Department (2 copies) complete with recommendations for further mitigation measures. All testing shall be completed prior to any grading work commencing. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to implementation. During grading activities, the project site shall be monitored by a professionally qualified archaeological monitor. The monitor is authorized to temporarily divert or stop equipment in order to investigate exposed cultural deposits. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the project archaeologist shall submit a final report to the Community Development Department. The final report shall follow the report format contained in Preservation Planning Bulletin, No. 4(a), December, 1989 (OHP). The final report shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission for completeness and acceptability. Acceptance of the final report by the Commission signifies completion of the archaeological mitigation program. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall retain a professionally qualified paleontologist to provide monitoring of earth -moving activities, including trenching for both on -site and off -site related work. Prior to commencing grading activities, the paleontologist shall conduct a preliminary survey and surface collection of any paleontological resources. The project paleontologist shall prepare a monitoring and salvage program for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to implementation. During grading activities, the project site shall be monitored by a professionally qualified paleontologist who maintains the necessary paleontologic collecting permits and repository agreements. In areas of known high potential, the project paleontologist may designate a paleontologic monitor to be present during 100% of the earth -moving activities. If, after 50 % of the grading is completed, it can be demonstrated that the level of monitoring should be reduced, the project paleontologist may so amend the mitigation program. The paleontologic monitor(s) is authorized to temporarily divert equipment while removing fossils. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the project paleontologist shall submit a final report to the Community Development Department. The final report shall discuss the methods used, results of the surface survey, identification, cataloging, curation, and CONAPRVL.354 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 storage of fossil materials collected; and the significance of the paleontological resources. A final report of the finds and their significance after all operations are complete shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission for acceptability. Acceptance of the final report for the project by the Historic Preservation Commission signifies completion of the program of mitigation. 25. Prior to final map approval by the City Council, the applicant shall meet the parkland dedication requirements as set forth in Section 13.48, La Quinta Subdivision Code, by paying parkland fees in lieu, as may be determined in accordance with said section. 26. Design and architectural plans for the future residences shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. All approved standards shall be included in the CC&R's. A copy of the CC&R's shall be submitted to the City Attorney and Community Development Department for review prior to final map approval. PUBLIC SERVICES AIviD UTILITIES: 27. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City Fire Marshal per their letter dated August 8, 1990 (on file in the Community Development Department). 28. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District. 29. All existing overhead utility lines and poles adjacent to the site shall be undergrounded. 30. The applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to Jefferson Street and 53rd Avenue from all abutting individual lots. Access to these streets from this subdivision shall be restricted to street intersections only. 31. A common area lot shall be established for that area between the tract perimeter wall and street right-of-way along Jefferson Street (20 feet) and 53rd Avenue (10 feet). The homeowner's association for this subdivision shall be responsible for landscape maintenance of the common lot(s) and landscaped parkway. 32. The applicant shall have street improvement plans (for public and private streets) prepared by a registered civil engineer. The street improvements, including traffic signs and markings, and raised median islands shall conform to City standards as determined by the Director of Public Works and adopted by the LQMC and General Plan. CONAPRVL.354 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 Street pavement sections shall be based on a Caltrans design procedure for a 20-year life and shall consider soil strength and anticipated traffic loading. The minimum pavement section shall be 3-inches AC/4-inches Class-2 base for local streets and 4 Ih-inches by 6- inches for arterial and collector streets. 33. The applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to the District's Water Management Program and be in conformance with City Ordinance 220 (water conservation). 34. All underground utilities shall be installed, with trenches compacted to City standards, prior to construction of any street improvements. A soils engineer retained by the applicant shall provide certified report of soil compaction tests for review by the Director of Public Works. 35. Drainage disposal facilities shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 36. The developer of this subdivision of land shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of the final map without the approval of the City Engineer. 37. The applicant shall pay all fees charged by the City as required for processing, plan checking and construction inspection. The fee amount(s) shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is undertaken and accomplished by the City. 38. An encroachment permit for work in any abutting local jurisdiction shall be secured prior to constructing or joining improvements. 39. Applicant shall dedicate all necessary public street rights -of -way including corner cutbacks. Applicant shall dedicate rights -of -way and easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, park lands, drainage basins, common areas, and centralized mail delivery units. Applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for sidewalk/bikepath purposes over the landscape setback lots along Jefferson Street and 53rd Avenue. The right-of-way dedications for public streets shall be as follows: Jefferson , treet: half -street (60 feet) right-of-way for 120-foot wide (Major Arterial). This right-of-way shall be dedicated within 60 days after approval of the tentative map. CONAPRVL.354 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 53rd Avenue: half -street (36 feet) right-of-way for 72-foot wide (Collector Street). Interior priv tests: full -street (37 feet) right-of-way, plus 5-feet wide public utility easements, plus suitable right-of-way conforms for "knuckle" turns all as required by the City Engineer. 40. The applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, street improvements for the following streets to the requirements of the Director of Public Works and the La Quinta Municipal Code prior to approval of the final map. a. Interior private streets: 36-foot wide street improvements per Riverside County Standard Drawing No. 104 and 800 including all appurtenant conforms and amenities. b. Jefferson Street (from All American Canal to 53rd Avenue): half width street improvements plus a 14-foot wide south bound lane plus a full median per Riverside County Standard Drawing No. 100, plus suitable conforms to match existing improvements including a transition beyond the tract boundary along with other appurtenant amenities as required by the City Engineer. C. 53rd Avenue: half -width improvements per Riverside County Standard Drawing No. 102, plus a 14-foot wide eastbound lane plus suitable conforms to match existing improvements including a transition beyond the tract boundary along with other appurtenant amenities as required by the Direcotr of Public Works. Improvements shall include all appurtenances such as traffic signs, channelization markings, raised medians if required, street name signs, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters approved in design and location by the U.S. Post Office and the City Engineer. Mid -block street lighting is not required. Enhancements to existing improvements may be required. Improvements may be required beyond the tract boundaries. 41. Traffic signals are required at the following intersections: o Jefferson Street and 53rd Avenue - The applicant is responsible for 12 1/2% of the cost to design and construct the signal. o Jefferson Street and 52nd Avenue - The applicant is responsible for 6% of the cost to design and construct the signal or percentage of the cost as determined by the Director of Public Works. CONAPRVL.354 8 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 The signals will be installed by the City when traffic conditions warrant the installation. 42. Applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, the improvements required hereby prior to approval of the final map. The applicant shall pay cash or provide security in guarantee of cash payment for required improvements which are deferred for future construction by others. The applicant's responsibility for deferred improvements may be satisfied through participation in a City major thoroughfare improvement program if this development becomes subject to such a program. 43. Storm water run-off produced in 24 hours by a 100-year storm shall be retained on site in landscaped retention basin(s) designed for a maximum water depth not to exceed six feet. The basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. Other requirements include, but are not limited to, a grassed ground surface with permanent irrigation improvements, and appurtenant structural drainage amenities all of which shall be designed and constructed in accordance with requirements deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. 44. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological, and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted with a report submitted for review along with grading plan. The report recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and/or engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. A statement shall appear on the final subdivision map that a soils report has been prepared for the tract pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 45. The tract grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to final map approval. The tract shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the tract through a designated overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. The tract shall be graded to receive storm flow from adjoining property at locations that have historically received flow. The design of the tract shall not cause any change in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the tract. Storm water run-off produced in 24 hours during a 100-year storm shall be retained on site. The tributary drainage area for which the applicant is responsible shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. CONAPRVL.354 9 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 A trickling sand filter and leachfield of a design approved by the Director of Public Works shall be installed to percolate nuisance water. The sand filter and leach field shall be sized to percolate 22 gallons per day per 1,000 square feet of drainage area. 46. Prior to issuance of any building permit the applicant shall provide a separate document bearing the seal and signature of a California registered civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, or surveyor that lists actual building pad elevations. The document shall, for each lot in the tract, state the pad elevation approved on the grading plan, the as -built elevation, and shall clearly identify the difference, if any. The data shall be organized by tract phase and lot number and shall be cumulative if the data are submitted at different times. 47. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall employ or retain California registered civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, or surveyors, as appropriate, who will provide, or have his or her agents provide, sufficient supervision and verification of the construction to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings and certify compliance of all work with approved plans, specifications and applicable codes. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all plans which were signed by the Directrtr of Public Works. Each sheet of the drawings shall have the words "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As Constructed" clearly marked on each sheet and be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. 48. Applicant may seek reimbursement from City for specific improvement right of way acquisition costs that exceed a nominal fair -share responsibility noted as follows: Jefferson Street improvements: West of centerline - 100 % of cost is reimbursable; East of centerline - 53 % of cost is reimbursable; Reimbursement from City shall be limited to funds specifically received by City for the improvements and right-of-way parcel for which reimbursement is sought. CONAPRVL.354 10 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 49. Access to Jefferson Street shall not be less than 660-feet from intersection of 53rd Avenue. Access to Jefferson Street shall be limited to right in/out movements only regardless of location. 50. Applicant shall make access provisions for access to the landscape nursery from an interior private street, which shall become available for use only after the nursery land is subdivided for single family residential use. The lots of the subdivided nursery land shall be incorporated into the homeowners' association for TT 26444 and the future landowners of the lots shall enjoy the same rights, privileges, and obligations as enjoyed by the other members of the association. 51. If the private streets are planned to be gated, all streets shall be widened to provide a turnaround space unless limited to emergency needs of police and fire personnel. 52. Primary access for this tract shall be from 53rd Avenue to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 53. The City is contemplating adoption of a Major Thoroughfare Improvements Ordinance. If the ordinance is adopted at least 60 days prior to recordation of any final map in this development, this project shall be subject to the provisions of the ordinance. 54. Grading, drainage, street, lighting, landscaping and irrigation, park, gate, and perimeter wall plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the Director of Public Works. 55. Prior to occupancy of homes or other permanent buildings within the development, the applicant shall install all street and sidewalk improvements, traffic control devices and street name signs along access routes to those buildings. 56. For projects requiring NPDES construction permits, a copy of the applicant's NPDES permit and Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a permit for construction of site improvements. 57. Improvement plans submitted to the City for plan checking shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and CONAPRVL.354 it Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 26444 (Amendment 1) Extension of Time #2 January 9, 1996 "Landscaping." All plans shall have signature blocks for the Director of Public Works and are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, gates and entryways, and parking lots. If water and sewer plans are included on the street and drainage plans, the plans shall have an additional signature block for the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The combined plans shall be signed by CVWD prior to their submittal for the City Engineer's signature. "Landscaping"plans shall normally include landscape improvements, irrigation, lighting, and perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the Director of Public Works. 58. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the developer may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. When final plans are approved by the City, the developer shall furnish accurate computer files of the complete, approved plans on storage media and in program format acceptable the Director of Public Works. 59. The maximum number of lots for this site shall be based on General Plan Policies 2-1.1.1 and 2-1.2.2 which state that dwelling unit yield is based on net acres and no more than 3 dwelling units per acre (i.e., 94 lots). CONAPRVL.354 12 pads uasaajjar i ! a � yy "V9Z ON loyal 3NLYINU Attachment 2 • c N _ _ wa) t —T .Tr --I Y Q M - r— {i w S �l � W , "� �iY ■ iY Has-- f�II.11 W:0 - ~;=�i sty with a]ow e%��lt?y resicDei�tiatd�aracter '•':' tfudugh tha'deveiopment otioMi' t�r_rresi�»'_ : `r-. dendai areas and - higher=�lenstty re�identtd :;` oroas with WOWS MOMS a1 opmt Objective 2-1.1 The General Plan shall identify residential land use categories on the land Use Policy Diagram which provide for a variety of residential product types, densities and development characteristics. Policy 2-1.1.1 The General Plan shall define residential density according to the formula presented below. D = du A-(c+i+a) Where D = Residential density A = Total site area (acres) c = Total commercial land area (acres) i = Total industrial land area, including electrical substations, well sites and watercourselli9ood control facilities (acres) a = Arterial street rights -of -way (acres) du = Dwelling Units Policy 2-1.1.2 All new development shall conform to the building intensity (as defined by the density range) shown on the Land Use Policy Diagram. The maximum density of the development shall not exceed the maximum density for the site, except where a density bonus for the provision of particularly desirable design amenities is allowed. Policy 2-1.1.3 Sites considered for density bonuses shall be evaluated on an individual basis considering such factors as adjacent land use compatibility, available services, infrastructure, traffic impacts, provision of affordable housing opportunities, enhanced urban design standards, provision of significant open space, on -site .histond or cultural resource preservation, and similar issues. A density bonus may be granted for BRIM, Inc. ►r+-3vr Attachment 3 irx orporating particularly desirable design amenities into a project This bonus shall not exceed 10 percent Policy 2-1.1.4 A Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) category shall be established on the Land Use Policy Diagram. The density standard for this category shall range from 0-2 dwelling units✓acres (DU/AC). The maximum density shall be 2 DU/AC, the general residential product type shall be characterized by one to two- story, single-family detached homes on large lots or clustered one to two-story, single-family attached (condominium) units in projects with generous amounts of open space, subject to conditions for varying residential use guidelines as specified in Policy 2-1.1.8. Appropriate locations of VLDR uses shall include areas adjacent to LDR uses, within planned communities which provide a variety of residential dwelling unit types, in environmentally sensitive areas and in areas where equestrian uses are allowed or where a rural character is desired. Specfic areas appropriate for VLDR uses include the portions of the City east of Jefferson Street and south of Avenue 50. Policy 2-1.1.5 A Low Density Residential (LDR) category shall be established on the Land Use Policy Diagram. The density standard for this category shall range from 2-4 DU/AC. The maximum density shall be 4 DU/AC. The general residential product type shall be charac- terized by one to two-story, single-family detached homes on large or medium size lots and/or clustered one to two-story, single-family attached units in projects with generous amounts of open space, subject to conditions for varying residential use guidelines as specified in Policy 2-1.1.9. Appropriate locations of LDR uses shall include all areas of the City except the Village, along Highway 111 and in open space areas. Policy 2-1.1.6 A Medium Density Residential (MDR) category shall be established on the Land Use Policy Diagram. The density standard for this category shall range from 4-8 DU/AC. The maximum density shall be 8 DU/AC- The general residential product type shall be charac- terized by one to two-story, single-family detached homes on medium and small lots and/or one to two- story, single-family attached units in projects with open space, subject to the conditions for varying residential use guWAies as spedfied in PoWy2-1.1.9 AAWOPdate kmwns of MDR uses include the Cove area, new bansportation arteries and in planned communities. The Chapter 2 - Land Use Element 2-8 City of La Quints General Plan Attachment 4 Objective 2-1.2 The General Plan shall identify a 'Rural Residential Overlay' designation on the Land Use Policy Diagram to facilitate the preservation and development of a rural character in desirable locations in the City. Policy 2-1.2.1 A 'Rung/ Residential Overlay' shall be identified on the Lend Use Policy Diagram in the area generally bounded by the Coachella Canal, Jefferson Street, Monroe Street, Avenue 54 and Avenue 55. Policy 2-1.2.2 The anowsble densely of areas subject to the Rural Residential Overlay shall be adjusted as !allows: • The density range of LDR areas shall be d-3 DU/AC. • The density range of VLDR areas shall be 0-1 DU/AC- p olicy 2-1.2.3 Development in areas subject to the Rural Residential Overlay shall conform to the following design guidelines which evoke a rural character. • All development in areas subject to the Rural Residential Overlay shall utilize rural street cross -sections (e.g., no vertical curb and gutter). • The front yard setbacks of all structures shall be increased an additional 20 feet beyond the mini- mum specified in the applicable zoning district • ArchitecamW styles of buildings shag emphasize a Waal theme (e.g., Rand, Western, Southwest or Mission styles). • Fencing guidelines representative of a rural, equestrian theme shall be developed for each project Solid, opaque block walls shall be prohibited. • Equestrian paths adjacent to speed collector and arterial streets shall be required to link residential areas with trail systems and Lake Cahuilla County Park. BI *1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: JANUARY 9, 1996 CASE: PLOT PLAN 94-543 APPLICANT: ALI BABA FARZANEH REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A MINOR AMENDMENT REGARDING THE EXTERIOR COLORS FOR A FREE-STANDING RESTAURANT, SESAMES RESTAURANT, IN THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATION: NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: N-C (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) ZONING: C-P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WAS APPROVED FOR THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER (PLOT PLAN 91-456) DURING THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL IN 1991. THIS NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSED THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. SINCE THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION IS A MINOR EXTERIOR CHANGE, NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION IS DEEMED NECESSARY. SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USE: NORTH: C-P/PART OF SHOPPING CENTER SOUTH: R-2*4,000/LA QUINTA CIVIC CENTER EAST: S-R/VACANT AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WEST: C-P/PART OF SHOPPING CENTER Staffrpt.56 In January, 1995, the Planning Commission approved the site plan and building elevations under Plot Plan 94-543, Minute Motion 95-003 for the restaurant. Sesames restaurant is presently under construction. It is a satellite building within the La Quinta Village Shopping Center. Condition No. 18 of the Minute Motion requires that all exterior colors and materials match those used within the existing shopping center. The restaurant operator is now requesting approval to modify the exterior stucco colors from the approved off-white to a light beige color (Color samples will be available at the meeting). No other changes to colors or materials such as the roof or column bases is proposed. The change proposed in color to the exterior stucco is relatively minor. The color will blend and be compatible within the colors of the existing shopping center. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the color change for the restaurant. By Minute Motion 96-_, approve the request for change of exterior color as submitted. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Letter of Request Staffrpt.56 CASE MAP `"SE"' PLOT PLAN 94-543 SESAME'S AVACHMENT 1 -PC _ I , NORTH SCALE: NTS 007 DEC-22-95 FRI 11:51 - P.. 01 ATTACHMENT 2 JANUARY 22, 1995 ATTENTION: Christine Di lorio REGARDING: Change of exterior color for Sesame. Please schedule a meeting, early January to discuss exterior color for Sesame. Thank You Ali Baba Farzaneh 73.061 El Paw, Pak Dec ri, CA 922601". Tekplvvu, (619)..568-2782 . ..... . .. ... . BI #2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: JANUARY 9, 1996 CASE: ' SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE 95-091 APPLICANT: LIBERTY MUTUAL (LEGENDS OF GOLF) REP.: MS. MAGGIE HAND REQUEST: APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY ADVERTISING FOR THE LIBERTY MUTUAL GOLF TOURNAMENT AT PGA WEST RESORT FROM MARCH 18 - 24, 1996 LOCATION: RESORT IS SOUTH OF AVENUE 54 AND WEST OF MADISON STREET On November 29, 1995, staff received a request, by the Liberty Mutual, for approval of 24 on -and off -site directional signs for a golf tournament at the PGA West Resort from March 18 - 24, 1996. (Attachments 1 and 2). Approximately 16 off -site directional signs are proposed in the right-of-way along Washington Street and Jefferson Street. The proposed signs are two feet by two feet (4 sq. ft.) and will be no higher than seven feet in overall height. The signs will be placed 10-feet from the existing street paving for traffic safety (Attachments 3 and 4). The eight remaining signs will be placed south of Avenue 54 on PGA Boulevard, a private street inside the Resort. These signs are 4 to 16 sq. ft. in size. Three additional signs will be placed along Highway 111 which requires Caltrans approval and therefore do not require Planning Commission review and approval. Section 5.64.020 provides, in part, that permits are to be issued for special purposes, "... and not on a continuing basis for permanent advertising or identification purposes," and further, "... each permit shall be issued for a specific period." pCGT.128/conapxv1.356 This application request is similar in size and number to other golfing events approved by the Planning Commission in the past (i.e., Diners Matches, Lexus Challenge, Bob Hope Chrysler Classic, etc.). Staff recommends approval of the request as conditioned. By Minute Motion 96-_, approve Special Advertising Device 95-091, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval. Attachments: 1. Letter from Ms. Maggie Hand 2. Location Map 3. Sign Exhibit 4. Sign Location Map PCGT.128/conaprv1.356 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE 95-091 LIBERTY MUTUAL JANUARY 9, 1996 1. The sign application request is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15305 (Subsection B). 2. The signs are temporary, relatively small and placed so as not to hinder vehicular visibility. Therefore, the impact to existing adjacent areas and/or traffic will be minimal. Additionally, the signs are well designed. 3. The temporary signing request, as conditioned, will meet the provisions of Chapter 5.64 of the Municipal Code. The advertising is needed for this special function. 1. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department before placement of any advertising device(s) within the right-of- way. No advertising device shall be located within ten (10) feet of the edge of pavement or street curbing. The directional signs shall not interfere with vehicle or pedestrian traffic or reduce vision clearances for motorists or pedestrians. Off -site signs along Jefferson Street or other public access routes shall be mounted on maximum 2" by 2" wooden posts or other break -away material approved by the City Engineer. 2. A total of sixteen (16) off -site signs adjacent to public streets and eight (8) signs adjacent to PGA Boulevard shall be allowed unless otherwise approved by the Community Development Director. 3. The applicant shall obtain written approval from all private property owners if a sign is placed on their property. 4. The directional signs shall be installed no earlier than March 16, 1996, and shall be removed the day after closure of the event. 5. All on -site temporary banners shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to their installation. 6. Advertising within adjacent cities or along Highway 111 shall be approved by the appropriate public agency. CONAPRVL.356/pcgt.128 p1rWACMKIESUIr n Fred Raphael Owner/Producer Tim Iley )urnament Director Maggie Hand rnament Coordinator Volunteers Jody Meyer Sales Manager Allyson Therrell .ales Administrator 5-920 PGA Boulevard a Quinta, CA 92253 619/777-1150 619/777-1157(fax) 6tS -09 t November 28, 1995 Mr. Greg Trousdell City of La Quinta Planning and Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. Trousdell, Enclosed is a request for a sign permit for the Liberty Mutual Legends of Golf Tournament to be held March 18 - 24, 1996. We have received permission from the city to hold the event. The signs will be put up approximately March 12 and will be taken down by March 20, 1996. I have attached a drawing of the signs and the placement. In addition we will be placing temporary cardboard "No Parking" signs along Madison Avenue on both sides of the street. In addition, the public parking lot will be the large parking area across from the permanent parking lot next to KSL's office from March 18 - 24, 1996. Parking will not be on Jefferson and 54th this year. I have attached a drawing. If you need any additional information, please call me at 777-115 0. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, 4,� Maggie Hand Tournament Coordinator `, rb ro Ln 0 z m r> Y m i z m r b A r G C7 m z U a 1 V I i z 2QQ� •tt' ajFjF&CM Mj[pU4 eT b1� or I�j, -Y� a i �/4"Ply,. P W', it I-Q- Fla u d L- l t `M J x O-A " O-A - <7m:wmw-qftlllm a� O O� Jefferson Street C N a� G Washington Street r 6 174=� BI *3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: JANUARY 9, 1996 CASE: TRACT 23995 APPLICANT: INCO HOMES REQUEST: APPROVAL TO MODIFY THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SCHEME OF THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE PROTOTYPES LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF MILES AVENUE, WEST OF ADAMS STREET ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) The subject property, in the northern portion of Tract 23995, is subdivided for a total of 300 single family lots. The applicant has purchased 150 of the 300 lots within the tract and have recorded approximately 74 lots. In July, 1994, the applicant received approval of the design schemes for each of the four residential prototypes in the last year. Fourteen units have been constructed, including the models. Subsequently, two amendments modifying the architectural design have been approved. These amendments allowed changes to the design of the garage doors and rear yard patio/trellis covers. Due to the poor sales response, the applicant has requested approval to modify the architectural design of the facades of three of the four prototypes. The applicant anticipates that the changes will allow them to be more competitive with the area's residential real estate market. The applicant noted that they are pre -selling units prior to construction so the buyer has the option of the original design treatment or the modified version. Three of the four approved prototypes (Plans 1, 2, and 3) are proposed for changes each has three different facades (Facade A, B, and C). The following is a brief description of the unit type and change proposed. Staffzpt.55 Facade A - Tower element over entry has been eliminated. Facade B - 1. The height of roof has been lowered from approximately 17-feet 3- inches to 16-feet. 2 Stucco surround treatment around windows has been modified. Facade C - 1 . Tower element over entry has been eliminated 2. Height of roof has been lowered from approximately 18-feet 3-inches to approximately 16-feet. 3. Wainscot stone veneer has been eliminated. Facade A - 1. Three columns along the front of the house have been eliminated. 2. The height of the roof has been lowered residence from approximately 19-feet 9-inches to 17-feet. Facade B - The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 19-feet 9- inches to 18-feet 6-inches. Facade C - 1. The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 19-feet fl- inches to 18-feet 6-inches. 2. The wainscot material has been changed from stone to brick. Facade A - 1. The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 17-feet 8- inches to 16-feet 8-inches. 2. The dormer over the entry has been eliminated. 3. A reveal around the front of the residence has been eliminated. Facade B - 1. The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 17-feet 6- inches to 16-feet 8-inches. Staffrpt.55 2. The courtyard entry tower has been eliminated. 3. The stucco reveal around the top and front of the garage has been eliminated. Facade C - 1. The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 17-feet 6- inches to 16-feet 8-inches. 2. The courtyard entry tower has been eliminated. 3. A round window has been changed to rectangular. Facade A - 1. Two columns at the front of the house have been eliminated. 2. The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 20-feet to 17-feet. Facade B - The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 20-feet to 18-feet 6-inches. Facade C - The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 19-feet 8- inches to 18-feet 6-inches. Facade A - 1. The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 17-feet 6- inches to 16-feet 8-inches. 2. The dormer over the entry has been eliminated. Facade B - 1. The height of the roof has been lowered from 17-feet 6-inches to 16- feet 8-inches. 2. The courtyard entry tower has been eliminated. Facade C - 1. The height of the roof has been lowered from approximately 17-feet 6- inches to 16-feet 8-inches. 2. The courtyard entry tower has been eliminated. Staffrpt.55 All prototypes propose a four -foot deep patio cover, or trellis on the rear yard, over glass areas larger than four -feet by four -feet when facing west or south as required in the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant initially proposed a solid four -foot deep patio cover or an eight -foot deep patio cover. The applicant is now proposing a trellis instead of the solid patio cover. The trellis consists of three-inch by three-inch wood rafters, 12-inches on center supported by 6-inch x 6-inch posts. STAFF COMMENTS The proposed design modifications will be compatible with and not detrimental to the architectural design of the original design treatment of the prototypes, in that these changes will add diversity within the tract. All prototypes including the revised version, will be compatible with regards to the stucco walls, s-shaped tile roofs, colors, multi pane windows, stucco reveals and exposed rafters in compliance with the requirements of the Compatibility Review Process, Section 9.25.010 of the Municipal Code. The rear yard wood trellis rafters do not meet the minimum size specifications to provide the desired shade. Therefore, staff is recommending the wood rafters be reduced from 12-inches on center to 9-inches on center. Staff recommends approval by Minute Motion 96-_of the design modifications for Plans 1,2, and 3, Facades A, B, and C, subject to the following condition; 1. The plans for the distance between the rear yard trellis rafter shall be reduced from 12-inches on center to 9-inches on center. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Letter from Applicant 3. Revised Plans Staffrpt.55 ATTACHMENT 1 — — — XILI S CASE CASE No. Inco Homes Tract 23995 i 1 Future Single Family Homes �q Future Single Family Homes 1 1 : i r--- L4 SCALE: nts January 4, 1996 City of La Quinta P. O. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Stan B. Sawa Dear Stan: �1NC0 i9M Forthcoming are seven sets of the bluelines for the proposed changes to our current La Quinta project. As you know from our previous meeting, it is our goal to simplify the elevations on these houses. We have not changed the floor plans or the footprints. We are still modeling the current houses and since we pre -sell our homes we will be offering them to interested buyers. However, these new elevations will provide the opportunity to sell homes at a slightly more affordable rate, creating greater sales activity for the project as a whole. As part of our research in developing these elevations, we obtained input from our existing buyers and they are very pleased with the result. As you have seen, the changes made will provide for an attractive street scene that is consistent with the overall look of the project and the ten houses we have already built. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely, GarySorley, _ Director of Purchasing GS/la Enclosures Corporate OH 1282 W. Arrow Highm P.O. Box 9 Upland, CA 911 (909)981.8S FAX (909) 982.91 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA December 12, 1995 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Vice Chairman Gardner who asked Commissioner Anderson to lead the flag salute. II. ROLL CALL A. Vice Chairman Gardner requested the roll call: Present: Commissioners Anderson, Barrows, Butler, and Vice Chairman Gardner. Absent: Commissioner Newkirk Chairman Abels. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Anderson/Barrows to excuse Chairman Abels and Commissioner Newkirk. B. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, City Attorney Dawn Honeywell, Public Works Director Dave Cosper, Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Senior Engineers Steve Speer and John Freeland, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. III. PUBLIC COMMENT: None IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Tentative Tract 24890 - Time Extension 1. Staff explained that due to a lack of a quorum, this item was being continued as there were only four members of the Commission present at this meeting and two of the Commissioners must abstain, therefore there was no quorum of the Commission to review the item. The item was therefore continued to January 9, 1996. V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Special Advertising Device 95-090; a request of E. G. Williams Development Corporation for approval of a four -foot high by 22-foot long banner for temporary subdivision advertising to be placed don the exterior of the east perimeter wall facing Washington Street. PC12-12 Planning Commission Meeting December 12, 1995 1. Staff clarified this item would also be continued due to a lack of a quorum to review the item as Commissioner Butler would have to abstain due to a possible conflict of interest leaving only three Commissioners. Staff suggested this item be rescheduled to a special meeting of December 19, 1995, at 1:00 P.M. B. Median Island Landscaping for Highway 11 l; a request of the City for approval of a conceptual landscaping design for the Highway 111 medians. 1. Senior Engineer John Freeland presented the information contained in the staff report and gave a visual presentation of the proposed median landscaping. 2. Commissioner Anderson asked if the proposal hardscape, stamped concrete, rather than bomanti was a function of maintenance. Senior Engineer Freeland stated this was true and also due to breakage, bomanite is difficult to replace. 3. Commissioner Anderson asked if a similar pattern could be obtained with the concrete. Staff stated this was possible. 4. Commissioner Butler asked for clarification as to the location of the medians. Staff clarified the location and drainage breaks on the exhibit. 5. Commissioner Butler asked for clarification as to where the right turn -outs were to be located along the Highway I I I La Quinta Center. Staff stated they were to be as originally approved by the City and Caltrans for full median turns. The remainder would be right turn in/out only. 6. Commissioner Anderson asked if the plant palette was primarily shrubbery and did not include palm trees. Staff clarified that Caltrans would not allow the City to plant any trees in the medians. 7. Commissioner Barrows asked if the medians would be designed similar to those on 52nd Avenue as this designed in a regimental pattern. She stated the spacing needed to incorporate more rocks and spread out the Ocotillos. Public Works Director Dave Cosper explained the design was to back away from the dense planting and have a more irregular planting. 8. Commissioner Anderson stated the landscaping was more organic; happenstance landscaping was more attractive. PC12-12 Planning Commission Meeting December 12, 1995 9. Commissioner Butler asked where the City monument sign was proposed to be located. Staff explained its location and stated it would not be located in any median. 10. Commissioner Barrows clarified that the median would block the left turn movement out of the Von's Shopping Center closest to Washington Street. Staff agreed and stated this was the purpose. 11. Commissioner Barrows asked if other native plants could be used such as the Brittlebush. She thought they would be more maintenance free. Public Works Director Dave Cosper explained that they had just received permission from the City Council to send out an Request for Proposals. The firm chosen could consider using this type of plan material. 12. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Anderson to adopt Minute Motion 95-054 approving the conceptual landscaping design for the Highway 111 medians, subject to non -regular spacing and inclusion of Brittlebush. Unanimously approved. C. Street Name Change 95-007; a request of the City for approval to change the name of the cul-de-sac portion of Calle Paloma to Paloma Court. l . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Vice Chairman Gardner asked about the house numbering, especially on the west side of Calle Paloma. One side was in the 200's and the other 065; he asked if they would run sequentially, or what? Staff stated they were unaware of the numbering system, but they would look into the matter. Vice Chairman Gardner stated he was concerned about emergency vehicles being able to locate houses due to the addresses. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated staff would refer the matter to the Building and Safety Department for their review. 3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/ to adopt Resolution 95-046 recommending approval of the cul-de-sac street name change from Calle Paloma to Paloma Court. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Barrows, Butler, and Vice Chairman Gardner. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Newkirk and Chairman Abels. ABSTAIN: None. PC12-12 Planning Commission Meeting December 12, 1995 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR - None VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioner Butler asked staff if the Planning Commissioners Attendance at Council Meeting list was ready. Staff stated they were waiting for the appointment of a new Commissioner by the City Council before scheduling the Commissioners to attend the meetings. B. Community Development Director Jerry Herman asked the Commission if they had any suggestions for dates for the joint meeting with the City Council. He went on to explain their options and stated the Council wished to have the meeting late January, 1996. January did have a fifth Tuesday which would be an option. Following discussion, it was determined that January 30, 1996, would be suggested to Council as a joint meeting date. Agenda discussion items would be discussed at the January 9th Commission meeting. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Barrows to adjourn this meeting of the Planning Commission to a special meeting on December 19, 1996, at 7:00 P.M. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. Unanimously approved. PC12-12 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A Special meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA December 19, 1995 CALL TO ORDER 1:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 1:04 P.M. by Vice Chairman Gardner who asked Commissioner Anderson to lead the flag salute. II. ROLL CALL A. Vice Chairman Gardner requested the roll call: Present: Commissioners Anderson, Barrows, Newkirk, and Vice Chairman Gardner. Absent: Commissioner Butler and Chairman Abels. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Anderson to excuse Chairman Abels and Commissioner Butler B. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. III. PUBLIC COMMENT: None IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Special Advertising Device 95-090; a request of E. G. Williams Development Corporation for approval of a four -foot high by 22-foot long banner for temporary subdivision advertising to be placed on the exterior of the east perimeter wall facing Washington Street. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Newkirk asked how the banner on the east wall would be of any benefit to the project. Staff explained the location of the banner and how its placement would be of benefit to the project. PC12-19 Planning Commission Meeting December 19, 1995 3. Vice Chairman Gardner asked staff if the banner exceeded City regulations. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated there were no standards and the Planning Commission could make that determination. 4. Commissioner Anderson stated he felt the size was rather large, but due to the distance from the street it would need to be that size to be read. Community Development Director Jerry Herman clarified that each banner is evaluated case by case as it relates to the request. 5. Vice Chairman Gardner asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Marty Butler, representing the applicant, stated she had no questions, but was there to answer any questions the Commission may have. 6. Commissioner Anderson asked if there were signs on Calle Tampico. Ms. Butler replied yes, but the attached senior project under construction was now blocking their single family residential project and they needed better visibility. 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Anderson/Newkirk to adopt Minute Motion 95-055 to approve Special Advertising Device 95-090, subject to conditions. Unanimously approved. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR - None VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS - None VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Newkirk/Anderson to adjourn this meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting on January 9, 1996, at 7:00 P.M. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 1:10 P.M. Unanimously approved. PC12-19 °/SrRlc� cam', C O I POST OFFIC D'RFCICH 1LLIS CCIIFKAS, oRESIDENI RA':'MOND , . RUMMION�DS, VICE PRESIDENT JOFfN W F^.c ADDEN DO!:OTHY "'. NICHOLS HEDDORE J. FISH EPHONE (619) 398-265: OF C-Rs SNERAI MANAGER G!IEl ; NGINr' -i BFRNARDINE SUF:G�l;, S CR' 'OK,ASSISIANFPN GtNA' `PA.NAC! t DVIINE AND SFt1 11-! , A `ORN '+5 rile: 1150.14 Jerry Herman Community Development Director City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mr. Herman: Subject: General Plan Consistency for CVWD Projects We are in receipt of your November 21 letter regarding general plan consistency of our upcoming capital improvement projects. As the agency responsible for domestic water service within the City of La Quinta, the district has worked very closely with La Quinta to maintain the aesthetics of our aboveground structures. Government Code Section 53091 exempts the district from any local jurisdictional requirements for facilities directly related to supply and transportation of domestic water. We will continue to work closely with the city relative to the aesthetics of our aboveground facilities. If you have any questions please call Steve Robbins, assistant director of engineering, extension 263. SR:lg/e10/herman Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager -Chief Engineer TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY T4,tf 4 4 a" 78-495 CALLS TAMPICO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 777-7000 FAX (619) 777-7101 November 21, 1995 Steve Robbins Assistant Director of Engineering Coachella Valley Water District Post Office Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FOR CVWD PROJECTS Dear Steve: This is to inform you that the Planning Commission at their meeting of November 14, 1995, reviewed your July 26, 1995, request for General Plan Consistency for upcoming CVWD Capital Improvement Projects. The Planning Commission found that the District projects are consistent. The Commission, per the La Quinta General Plan, requires that CVWD allow them to review and comment on the aesthetics and design treatment of above -ground structures. Please note the City's General Plan policy 7-1.1.10 states that: "The City sliall coordinate with CVWD to develop standards for the sensitive integration of potable water facilities, such as pump stations, well sites, water reservoirs, etc. within the City. Such standards may include buffering from adjacent development, screening of facilities, provision of access for maintenance, and integration with the desert landscape areas, etc.". Based upon this policy, (see enclosure) the Planning Commission is requesting CVWD submit building elevations, plot plan and landscape plan for all proposed above -ground construction capital improvement projects for Planning Commission review prior to initiation of the project. Itrss.333 #4 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 & , Please contact us so that we may give you further information for what will be necessary for review of your projects. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Very truly JERRWERMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JH:cw Enc. cc: Steve Speer, Engineering Department, City of La Quinta Christine di Iorio, Planning Mgr., Community Dev. Dept., City of La Quinta Stan B. Sawa, Community Development Department, City of La Quinta Tom Levy, Coachella Valley Water District Dave Cosper, Engineering Department, City of La Quinta ltrss.333 :::::_ lublic and.::. private.: utilities and stormwater rainage improvement which adequately meet is needs:of the City,of to quints at buiidout- )bjective 7-1.1 he City shall utilize a variety of means to nsure that adequate potable water supplies and wilitles are provided to all residential and non- isidential development in the community. Icy 7-1.1.1 City shall coordinate with the Coachella Valley er District (CVWD) to ensure the provision of a ►etual supply of potable water to all La Qufnta cents until such time that City provided service is s economical or better serves its residents. icy 7-1.1.2 City shall coordinate planning efforts with the VD to identify priority areas in the City for potable 3r facility expansion and upgrading. Icy 7-1.1.3 City shall require that new development provide fuate potable water infrastructure facilities that will sect with the main potable water distribution ern. Icy 7-1.1.4 City and CVWD shall continue to coordinate the ation and administration of improvement districts ►place undersized, unlined and under pressurized 9, and to expand potable water production and ►eyance capacity to increase potable water output. Icy 7-1.1.5 City shall coordinate with the CVWD and the rside County Fire Department to ensure that ble water distribution fadiities are adequately sized ,commodate fire flow requirements. icy 7-1.1.6 City shall coordinate with the CVWD to assess section fees to provide development with adequate ble water distribution facilities and an assured v supply. Policy 7-1.1. T The City shall coordinate with the CVWD in water conservation efforts to reduce the amount of potable water utilized by City residents. Such efforts shall be consistent with the Environmental Conservation Element of the General Plan. Policy 7-1.1.8 The City shall coordinate with the CVWD to evaluate strategies to increase the amount of recharge to the underground aquifier through the use of site design techniques, turf and agricultural irrigation methods, and the utilization of tertiary treated wastewater or lower quality potable water. Policy 7-1.1.9 The City shall require the dedication of real property within a proposed development for required water facilities to serve the development. Policy 7-1.1.10 The City shall coordinate with CVWD to develop standards for the sensitive integration of potable water facilities, such as pump stations, well sites, water reservoirs, eta within the City. Such standards may include buffering from adjacent development; screening of fadlities, provision of access for maintenance, and integration within the desert landscape areas, etc. Objective 7-1.2 The City shall utilize alternative means to ensure that adequate sewage collection and treatment facilities are provided to all residential and non- residential development in the community. Policy 7-1.2.1 The City shall coordinate with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to ensure the provision of a comprehensive sewage collection and treatment system until such time that City provided service is more economical or better serves its residents. Policy 7-1.2.2 The City shall coordinate with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to ensure the provision of new and retrofitted connections to its existing force main which links with the Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant 1, Ina Chapter 7 - Infrastructure and Public Services Element City of La Quints SLAQ.,,," 7-14 General Plan DATE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION December 19, 1995 TO: Concerned Riverside County Residents FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Senior Staff Analyst SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Transit Service Needs C nEFc z I j 9s5 G1 OF nr AC kr 1 Attached please find flyers announcing public hearings that will be held by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The hearings will be held in Blythe, Palm Desert and Temecula to receive public input on transit service needs in the County. The information received through the hearings will be shared with the public transit operators in the County to assist in planning transit service in the upcoming fiscal year (July 1996-June 1997) . It would be appreciated if you or your agency would share news of the hearings with citizens concerned with public transportation services in the county. Please encourage them to attend a hearing to express their views regarding areas in need of new transit service or areas needing a modification to the current service. If a person cannot attend a hearing, we will accept written comments as noted on the flyer. Thank you for your assistance. Should you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (909) 787-7141. 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 • Riverside, California 92501 (909) 787-7141 . FAX (909) 787-7920 VOICE YOUR OPINION LET US KNOW WHAT TRANSIT SERVICE IS NEEDED IN YOUR, AREA. JOIN US AT A PUBLIC HEARING ON: Wednesday, January 10, 1996 - 2:00 pm Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road Temecula, California 92590 Or, if you can't be there: Write and get your opinion on record. Send comments by February 1 to: Riverside - County Transportation Commission Transit Service Needs 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Hearing is sponsored by the Riverside County Transportation Commission pursuant to Section 99238.5 of the California Public Utilities Code. For further information contact Cathy Bechtel of RCTC at (909) 787-7141. CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN( CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM NOTICE OF FUNDS AVAILABILITY AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City of La Quinta is seeking project ideas and public input for the 22nd year of the Community Development Block Grant Pprogram. There will be approximately $130,000 available to fund eligible activities. Eligible activities are generally those which directly benefit primarily low and moderate income persons, handicapped, and senior citizens. Funding for La Quinta's Community Development Block Grant Program is expected to begin July 1, 1996. The La Quinta City Council will hold a public hearing Tuesday, February 6, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, to determine activities for program funding. The City of La Quinta Community Development Department is requesting proposals to be submitted by January 22, 1996. Project proposals and/or comments should be submitted in writing to: City of La Quinta Community Development Department P O Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Should you have any questions or comments regarding La Quinta's Community Development Block Grant Program, contact Fred Baker at (619) 777-7125. In the City's efforts to comply with the requirements of Title H of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, the Administration/Community Development Department requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodations(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk/Community Development Department a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. PUBLISH ONCE ON JANUARY 12, 1996 yOFTN� AGENDA A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL F1 PLANNING COMMISSION A Special Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Council Chamber 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California January 30, 1996 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - Flag Salute ROLL CALL BUSINESS ITEMS 1. La Quinta Village a. Parking b. Development Standards c. Architectural Guidelines d. Housing 2. Sculpture Park a. Clarification of use 3. Fee Waiver a. Charity events without non-profit status 4. Other Items PC/AGENDA cc-..plaA„a, C�"W-634N- * ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY '1STRICS COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (619) 398.2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E. LEVY, GENERAL MANAGER -CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON, SECRETARY JOHN W. McFADDEN OWEN MLCOOK, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M. NICHOLS December 21, 1995 REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS THEODORE J. FISH Jerry Herman Community Development Director City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mr. Herman: Subject: General Plan Consisten File: 1150.14 JAN 0 2 1996 CITY OF LA 00,3TA PLANNING DEPARR.'rNT for CVWD Projects We are in receipt of your November 21 letter regarding general plan consistency of our upcoming capital improvement projects. As the agency responsible for domestic water service within the City of La Quinta, the district has worked very,closely with La Quinta to maintain the aesthetics of our aboveground structures. Government Code Section 53091 exempts the district from any local jurisdictional requirements for facilities directly related to supply and transportation of domestic water. We will continue to work closely with the city relative to the aesthetics of our aboveground facilities. If you have any questions please call Steve Robbins, assistant director of engineering, extension 263. SR:lg/e10/herman Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager -Chief Engineer TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY T&t 4 4Q�w 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 777-7000 FAX (619) 777-7101 November 21, 1995 Steve Robbins Assistant Director of Engineering Coachella Valley Water District Post Office Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FOR CVWD PROJECTS Dear Steve: This is to inform you that the Planning Commission at their meeting of November 14, 1995, reviewed your July 26, 1995, request for General Plan Consistency for upcoming CVWD Capital Improvement Projects. The Planning Commission found that the District projects are consistent. The Commission, per the La Quinta General Plan, requires that CVWD allow them to review and comment oil the aesthetics and design treatment of above -ground structures. Please note the City's General Plan policy 7-1.1.10 states that: "The City shall coordinate with CVWD to develop standards for the sensitive integration of potable water facilities, such as pump stations, well sites, water reservoirs, etc. within the City. Such standards may include buffering from adjacent development, screening of facilities, provision of access for maintenance, and integration with the desert landscape areas, etc.". Based upon this policy, (see enclosure) the Planning Commission is requesting CVWD submit building elevations, plot plan and landscape plan for all proposed above -ground construction capital improvement projects for Planning Commission review prior to initiation of the project. Itrss.333 )# 1.6 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 `r(r Please contact us so that we may give you further information for what will be necessary for review of your projects. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Very truly JERR,/HERMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JH: cw Enc. cc: Steve Speer, Engineering Department, City of La Quinta Christine di Iorio, Planning Mgr., Community Dev. Dept., City of La Quints Stan B. Sawa, Community Development Department, City of La Quinta Tom Levy, Coachella Valley Water District Dave Cosper, Engineering Department, City of La Quinta ltrss.333 bjective 7-1.1 ie City shall utilize a variety of means to isure that adequate potable water supplies and cilities are provided to all residential and non- sidential development in the community. icy 7-1.1.1 City shall coordinate with the Coachella Valley er District (CVWD) to ensure the provision of a etual supply of potable water to all La Quints tents until such time that City provided service is e economical or better serves its residents. Icy 7.--1.1.2 City shall coordinate planning efforts with the VD to identify priority areas in the City for potable ar facility expansion and upgrading. 'Icy 7-1.1.3 City shall require that new development provide quate potable water infrastructure fadlities that will sect with the main potable water distribution am. ►icy 7-1.1.4 City and CVWD shall continue to coordinate the ration and administration of improvement districts eplace undersized, unlined and under pressurized Ps; and to expand potable water production and veyance capacity to increase potable water output licy 7-1.1.5 City shall coordinate with the CVWD and the ;rside County Fire Department to ensure that able water distribution fadlities are adequately sized accommodate fire flow requirements. ficy 7-1.1.6 i City shall coordinate with the CVWD to assess nection fees to provide development with adequate able water distribution facilities and an assured er supply. Policy 7=1.1.7 The City shall coordinate with the CVWD in water conservation effforis to reduce the amount of potable water utilized by City residents. Such efforts shall be consistent with the Environmental Conservation Element of the General Plan. Policy 7-1.1.8 The City shall coordinate with the CVWD to evaluate strategies to increase the amount of recharge to the underground aquifer through the use of site design techniques, turf and agricultural irrigation methods, and the utilization of tertiary treated wastewater or lower quality potable water. Policy 7-1.1.9 The City shall require the dedication of real property within a proposed development for required water facilities to serve the development Policy 7-1.1.10 The City shall coordinate with CVWD to develop standards for the sensitive integration of potable water facilities, such as pump stations, well sites, water reservoirs, eta within the City. Such standards may include buffering from adjacent developmeM screening of facilities, provision of access for maintenance, and integration within the desert landscape areas, eta Objective 7-1.2 The City shall utilize alternative means to ensure that adequate sewage collection and treatment facilities are provided to all residential and non- residential development In the community. Policy 7-1.2.1 'fie City shall coordinate with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to ensure the provision of a comprehensive sewage collection and treatment system until such time that City provided service is more economical or better serves its residents. Policy 7-1.2.2 The City shall coordinate with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to ensure the provision of new and retrofitted connections to its existing force main which links with the Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant W, Ina Chapter 7 - infrastructure and Public Services Element City of Le Quints 7m, 7-14 General Plan RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DEC 2 1 1995 DATE: December 19, 1995 C+Ty OF LA QUW r4 TO: Concerned Riverside County Residents PuiMNING DEPARTMENT FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Senior Staff Analyst SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Transit Service Needs Attached please find flyers announcing public hearings that will be held by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The hearings will be held in Blythe, Palm Desert and Temecula to receive public input on transit service needs in the County. The information received through the hearings will be shared with the public transit operators in the County to assist in planning transit service in the upcoming fiscal year (July 1996-June 1997) . It would be appreciated if you or your agency would share news of the hearings with citizens concerned with public transportation services in the county. Please encourage them to attend a hearing to express their views regarding areas in need of new transit service or areas needing a modification to the current service. If a person cannot attend a hearing, we will accept written comments as noted on the flyer. Thank you for your assistance. Should you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (909) 787-7141. 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 • Riverside, California 92501 (909) 787-7141 . FAX (909) 787-7920 VOICE YOUR OPINION LET US KNOW WHAT TRANSIT SERVICE IS NEEDED IN YOUR -AREA, JOIN US AT A PUBLIC HEARING ON: Wednesday, January 10, 1996 - 2:00 pm Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road Temecula, California 92590 Or, if you can't be there: Write and get your opinion on record. Send comments by February 1 to: Riverside -Coup y Transportation Commission Transit Service Needs 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Hearing is sponsored by the Riverside County Transportation Commission pursuant to Section 99238.5 of the California Public Utilities Code. For further information contact Cathy Bechtel of RCTC at (909) 787-7141.