The URL can be used to link to this page

1996 09 24 PC-1J 'L-- - -------- PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Council Chamber 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California September 24, 1996 7:00 P.M. **NOTE** ALL AGENDA ITEMS NOT CONSIDERED BY 11:00 P.M. MAY BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING Beginning Resolution 96-033 Beginning Minute Motion 96-030 I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call II. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA III. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete and submit a "Request to Speak" form to the Secretary and limit your comments to three minutes. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes of August 13, 1996 B. Department. Report PC/AGENDA V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Item .................... CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-025 Applicant ............. Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) Location .............. Alternative Site 1: 50-855 Washington Street Alternative Site 2: 78-140 Calle Tampico - Plaza La Quinta Request ............... Approval of the installation of six personal communication services (PCS) antennas and two radio equipment cabinets with two alternative sites being considered Action ................ Resolution 96- , Minute Motion 96- 2. Item ................... CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-026 Applicant ............. Pacific Bell Mobile Services Location .............. Simon Motors Auto Dealership Building - 78-611 Highway 111 Request ............... Certification of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 96-323; and Approval of the installation of six personal communication systems (PCS) wireless roof -mounted antennas and two radio equipment cabinets Action ................ Resolution 96- , Minute Motion 96- 3. Item .................. TENTATIVE TRACT 23773 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 96-589 Applicant ............ Starlight Estates, Inc. Location ............. Northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street Request .............. 1) Approval of the subdivision of 28.4 acres into 101 single family and other lettered private street lots pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance; and 2) compatibility review of new house plans under Chapter 9.60.290 of the Zoning Code Action ............... Resolution 96- , Resolution 96- , and a motion to continue the Site Development Plan to October 8, 1996. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS Item .................. SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION 96-356 Applicant ............ Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District Location ............. 78-865 Avenida Montezuma Request .............. Approval of on- and off -site signs and banners for the Oktoberfest Festival on October 11-13, 1996, at the Frances Hack Park pursuant to Chapters 9.100.140 and 9.160 of the Zoning Code Action ............... Minute Motion 96- 2. Item ................. MINOR TEMPORARY OUTDOOR EVENT 96-126 Applicant .......... La Quinta Arts Foundation Location ........... 78-865 Avenida Montezuma Request ............ Approval of a three-day outdoor event (JazzART `96) and sign program at the Frances Hack Park for November 8-10, 1996, according to provisions of the Zoning Ordinance pursuant to Chapter 9.100.140 Action .............. Minute Motion 96- PC/AGENDA 3. Item ................. PLOT PLAN 94-543 MINOR AMENDMENT Applicant .......... Sesame Restaurant Location ........... Northwest of the intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico within the La Quinta Village Shopping Center Request ............ Approval to install wrought iron fencing (5'0" to 6'6" in height) around the outdoor patio on the south side of the restaurant. Action ............. Minute Motion 96- 4. Item ................. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Applicant .......... City of La Quinta Location ........... Citywide Request ............ Approval of "Request For Proposals" to Update the General Plan Action ............. Provide staff with comments on the draft RFP, and recommend to the City Council that staff initiate the consultant selection process. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS Commissioner report of the City Council meeting of September 17, 1996 IX. ADJOURNMENT STUDY SESSION Session Room September 17, 1996 4:00 P.M. 1. All agenda items PC/AGENDA MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA August 13, 1996 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:03 P.M. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Gardner to lead the flag salute. B. Roll Call: Chairman Abels requested the roll call: Present: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, Woodard, and Chairman Abels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, City Attorney Don Owens, Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Associate Engineer Fred Bouma, Associate Planners Leslie Mouriquand and Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed III. PUBLIC COMMENT: None IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of July 23, 1996. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to approve the minutes. Unanimously approved. B. Department Report: None V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Specific Plan 96-027 Conditional Use Permit 96-028 and Environmental Assessment 96-325; a request of Home Depot for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact, approval of a Specific Plan to allow construction of a 218,300 square foot retail center on approximately 20 acres, and approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage in conjunction with the Home Depot Store. PC8-13 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 1. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff informed the Commission of the corrections to the report; Page 5, second paragraph should read, "The environmental review process indicated that the circulation layout should be discussed and resolved as part of the design review process to minimize on -site traffic conflicts and help in reducing air quality impacts in accordance with the Air Quality Element of the General Plan. Home Depot... ". The Environmental Impact Report on Page 12, Section 3.10 Noise. It is underlined as requiring an acoustical study and this needs to be modified as the applicant is supplying an eight foot block wall. In addition, staff informed the Commission of the addition of Condition #81.0 regarding the Jefferson Street monument sign requiring the sign to be eight feet in height and six feet in width. Condition #82 also added to require the 24" box trees shall be two and a half inches to three inches in diameter measured six inches above grade and the 36-inch box trees shall be four inches in diameter measured six inches above grade. 2. Commissioner Woodard asked what how the site plan had been modified to increase the number of parking spaces. Staff stated the applicant would answer this question and gave a general explanation of where the additional parking would be located. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels informed everyone that the public hearing portion of the meeting had been closed at the August meeting and this was the time for Commission discussion only. 4. Commissioner Woodard asked the applicant to explain where the eleven extra parking spaces were located on the site plan. Mr. Doug Couper, representing Home Depot, explained that by eliminating the handicap parking and reconfiguring the landscaping allowed them to gain the additional parking spaces. 5. Commissioner Woodard asked if the applicant had responded to any of the changes for Phase II that were addressed at the prior meeting by the Planning Commission. Staff stated the plans did not indicate any changes. It was addressed in the text of the specific plan only. Staff was recommending that a condition be added requiring the second phase be returned to the Commission for their review prior to construction. Discussion followed regarding the specific plan text. PC8-13 2 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 6. Commissioner Woodard asked staff if the illuminated sign on the Jefferson Street elevation was to be replaced with a painted sign. If so, why not have a nonilluminated sign instead of painting a sign on the wall. Staff stated the applicant suggested a painted wall sign to eliminate the glare to the neighbors. Staff stated there was no objection to this type of nonilluminated sign. 7. Commissioner Tyler stated that although he supported the project, he thought it should be studied further. In order to be fair in regards to what the Commission was asking of the applicant, he had visited several of their store sites in Southern California. He still had a concern regarding the height of the light standards and thought they should be restricted to 25-feet. The lights for the nursery still extend above the wall, but should not blind the neighbors. In addition, he still had concerns regarding the handicapped accessible walkway from the Highway 111 right of way to the store entry; the number of cart corrals was still inadequate and misplaced as they were not wide enough to accommodate all the different types and sizes of carts; the traffic signal at Vista Grande and Jefferson Street needs to be installed at the time the store opens, before any accidents occur. If the signal is not installed, at a minimum the preparation for the installation of the signal should be made at the time of construction for Phase I. The northeast corner landscaping must not be to high so as not to not block traffic view and the signs need to be finalized, such as "Indoor Lumber Yard" should be shortened to "Lumber". Need to clean up the sign clutter. 8. Commissioner Anderson stated he was concerned about providing shading for the ADA required walkway from Highway 111 to the store entrance. The applicant was providing a walkway that will be heavily used and it would be nice to have shade in this location. The trees would not need to be the tall trees as shown on the plans, but canopy trees. He too, was in favor of the 25- foot high lights and the architectural treatment on the rear of the building so as not to create a flat facade for the neighbors to the north. He agreed that this plan was an improvement over the last plan and he was glad Phase II would be reviewed by the Planning Commission in the future. 9. Commissioner Woodard asked how the cart storage locations were determined; one is located down at Highway 1 11. Staff stated they had raised the same concern and the applicant stated they would re-evaluate the locations. Staff had conditioned the issue to come back to the Community Development Director for approval. PC8-13 3 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 10. Commissioner Gardner stated his concern about the size of the trees to be planted on the north wall. A four inch diameter tree every 50 feet would not be ample to buffer the north elevation. They need to be able to reach 25-feet in height within a reasonable length of time. The signs and lights were still a concern and the lights need to be 25-foot standards. Traffic control on Jefferson Street needs to be studied further; the study does not warrant the signal, but asked if there was any way to do another study when the project is under construction to determine the morning and afternoon traffic. He would hope a study conducted at that time would allow a light to be installed upon opening of the center and not just the preparation work for the installation of the signal. 1.1. Commissioner Newkirk praised the applicant for the changes that had been made. He thought the signs were better and agreed that the "Indoor Lumber" yard sign could be reduced. It did not appear that the traffic signal would be installed at this time, but he agreed with the undergrounding be installed at the time of construction. In reference to the lights he thought they should be 25-feet in height. 1.2. Commissioner Butler stated he agreed with what had been stated so far by other Commissioners. He agreed that the trees on the north side of the property would need to be larger to block the lights for the neighbors. Concerning the sign on the Jefferson Street elevation, he thought the painted sign enhanced the neighborhood by not having an illuminated light. He agreed that "Indoor Lumber" yard sign was unnecessary. The lights should be 25-feet in height and adequate for the coverage of the parking lot. He thought the applicants concern for the nursery area lights still needed to be addressed. He would prefer the 25-foot high lights for security and safety purposes. As far as providing shading at the handicapped access walkway to the facility, he thought this would become an economic burden on the applicant that had not been placed on any other developer. 13. Chairman Abels stated he thought the applicant had addressed the concerns of the Commission. As far as requiring another traffic study, he did not see how any additional studies would change the results and the City does not want to place any additional burden on the applicants. He agreed with changing the "Indoor Lumber" yard sign and the undergrounding work necessary for the installation of a signal. As far as the lights for the Nursery area he agreed with the applicants request. PC8-13 4 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 14. Commissioner Anderson clarified that the shade he indicated to, was for shade trees. 15. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the concerns that had been stated by the Commission. 16. Mr. Doug Couper, stated he had nothing to say about the traffic signal as this was up to the City; he had no problem with the 25-foot high parking lot lights; and they would shield the Nursery Center lights at 25-feet. 17. Commissioner Woodard asked if the applicant understood about providing the undergrounding conduit for the signal to the median at the time of construction. Mr. Couper stated they had no problem with this. 18. Mr. Couper stated that in regard to the handicapped parking, they would be required to comply with the ADA standards. 19. Commissioners discussed with the applicant the wall packs for the north elevation lights, being lowered to create less light illumination. Mr. Couper stated they would be shielded and not reflect off the building. 2.0. Commissioner Tyler asked how many lights would be left on at all times. Mr. Couper stated only those required for security by Sheriff's Department and the City ordinances. Discussion followed regarding what is normally required. 21. Mr. Couper stated that regarding the cart corrals, they would work with staff to reach a solution. The "Indoor Lumber" yard sign would have to be addressed at the corporate level. Commissioner Woodard asked staff how this would be addressed when there is no solution at this time. Chairman Abels stated it would be added to the conditions. Mr. Couper further stated the trees would be planted 25-foot on -center at the rear of the building. 22. Commissioner Tyler asked if the specific plan would be updated. Staff stated it was required as part of the Conditions of Approval. 23. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Newkirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-028, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to the City Council. PC8-13 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, Woodard, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 24. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-029, recommending approval of Specific Plan 96- 027 to the City Council, subject to conditions as revised: a. Modifications to the Conditions of Approval: 1) #2-Change 30 feet to 25 feet. 2) #3-Change "prior to issuance of building permits" to "prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy". 3) #21-Add..."screen walls, landscaping and proper signs". 4) #38-Change..."prior to issuance of a building permit" to "prior to construction of any building". 5) #48-B.1.-Delete "Install signal prior to opening any retail outlet in the Specific Plan that generates sufficient traffic to warrant installation". 6) #48-C.-Replace 7/12/96 with 8/5/96. 7) #48-C.3.-Delete. 8) #85-The Phase II site plan is a conceptual design only. The final site plan shall require review and approval under a Site Development Permit by the Planning Commission per Section 9.210.010 of the Zoning Code. b. Additions to the Conditions of Approval: 1) The trees to be planted on the northern property line shall be planted 25-foot on center. 2) The north elevation wall pack lights shall be lowered. 3) Traffic signal conduit for the Jefferson Street and Vista Grande intersection shall be installed before Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 4) The wording "Indoor Yard" would be eliminated from the "Lumber" sign. 5) The northeast corner landscaping shall not exceed 30-inches in height within the line of sight 6) The Garden Center lights will be 25-feet in height and shielded. 7) The Jefferson Street monument sign shall be 8-feet high and six feet in length. 8) All 36-inch box trees shall be a minimum of 4-inches in diameter as measured 12-inches from grade. 9) All 24-inch box trees shall be a minimum of two and a half inches to three inches in diameter as measures six inches from grade. PC8-13 6 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 25. Commissioner Anderson asked if the Commission wanted to require the shading over the pedestrian walkway. Commissioner Butler stated it would be an economic burden to the applicant and he did not feel it was necessary. Commissioner Woodard stated he did not feel additional shading was warranted due to the amount of changes Home Depot had already agreed to accommodate the Commission. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, Woodard, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 26. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Newkirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-030, recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 96-028 to the City Council, subject to conditions as amended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, Woodard, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. B. Public Use Permit 96-018; a request of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church for approval to allow construction of building additions totaling 6,114 square feet of new office, Parish Hall, and small chapel to an existing church campus, and an application for greater building height. 1. Associate Planner Leslie Mouriquand presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff informed the Commission that the requested modifications would eliminate eleven parking spaces. A condition had been added requiring the applicant to move the structure back five feet into the courtyard area to provide a drive aisle of 25-feet in width. 2. Commissioner Tyler asked if this was a part of the master plan. Staff stated there had been some discussion between the applicant and staff regarding this subject and it was determined that the modifications did fit their master design. Commissioner Tyler asked if they still met the parking requirements. Staff stated the requirement was based on the number of seats in the main sanctuary and the count provided did meet this requirement. Commissioner Tyler asked if the handicapped spaces would be relocated. Staff stated four would be lost but there are six in the rear with a large loading zone and according to City ordinance only five are required. Discussion followed as to the location of the handicapped parking spaces. It was determined that the four spaces being eliminated should be replaced in the same proximity. PC8-13 7 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 3. Commissioner Anderson clarified that the building height being requested was 36-feet. Discussion followed regarding the height of the existing structures. 4. There being no filrther questions of staff, Chairman Abels opened the public hearing. Mr. Robert Ricciardi, architect for the applicant, spoke regarding the proposal and gave a history of the church construction. Regarding the conditions of approval, they concur with all the conditions. In reference to the handicapped parking, Mr. Ricciardi stated the existing handicapped parking in the rear of the church was currently working the best as they were able to take the parishioners directly into the sanctuary through a rear door. 5. Commissioner Woodard stated the plans before him did not show any difference in the size of the handicapped stalls. Mr. Riccardi explained the spaces were sized for handicapped parking but it was not indicated on the site plan. Discussion followed regarding the handicapped parking. 6. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public hearing. 7. Commissioner Woodard stated his concern about the structure being so close to the street that the addition would be in conflict and detract from the main structure and for that reason the height should be reduced. 8. Commissioner Anderson stated he too had a concern about the height of the structure and its proximity to the street. He agreed that due to its proximity it would diminish the grandeur of the main sanctuary. The addition is architecturally compatible except for the overall height. 9. Commissioner Newkirk stated that the existing structure is something of beauty and a history of La Quinta and with the addition it reminds him of a Mission. He did not think the height detracted from the overall picture. 10. Commissioner Gardner stated he agreed with Commissioner Newkirk. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Gardner/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-031 approving Public Use Permit 96-018, subject to conditions. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, Woodard, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. PC8-13 8 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 C. Conditional Use Permit 96-027; a request of Boston West, L.L.C. for certification of Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approval to allow construction of a 3,250 square foot restaurant with a drive -through lane. l . Planning Manager Christine di Iorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Butler asked about the location of the proposed landscape screen wall. Staff pointed out the location along the south elevation. Commissioner Butler asked if the pillars would be hidden. Staff stated they would not. 3. Commissioner Anderson asked if the berming would provide enough screening that the wall would not be needed. Staff stated this was what was anticipated. 4. Commissioner Tyler stated that a three foot wall was not tall enough to screen the height of a vehicle. He thought it should be taller to be effective. Commissioner Woodard agreed that three feet was not enough height to shield the view of the vehicle from the street. 5. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels opened the public hearing. Mr. John Baker, Area Developer for Boston Markets addressed the Commission. Concerning the height of the screen wall, they had mirrored the activity of the other restaurants presently in the area. The typical intent of screening the drive -through is to screen the headlights from on -coming traffic. This typically, is accomplished with a three foot wall or berm. He questioned whether they understood the City's intent for requiring the wall. The purpose of the drive -through is for families to take the food home to replace a home cooked meal rather than eating fast food. They offer a prepared home -cooked meal concept. They have been well received in the desert and are anxious to get started. He further stated the only objection to staffs recommendations was the awnings. They could remove the lettering on the awnings, but the nature of the color scheme on the awnings was important. They do not have the recognition as some other restaurants have as their concept is new. In trying to build brand awareness and identity, the one element they want to maintain is the awning colors. 6. Commissioner Woodard asked about the material of the awning. Mr. Baker explained the material and discussed the internal illumination of the awning. He stated they could illuminate the awning with down -lighting to light the sidewalk and entryway in place of internal illumination. PC8-13 9 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 7. Mr. Baker went on to explain the layout of the site plan and stated they would like to start construction as soon as possible. They anticipate opening by the time the season begins. 8. Commissioner Woodard thanked Mr. Baker for his presentation and stated he enjoyed their product. He understood the identification issue, but he had a concerned that each new identity coming into the Center would add a hodge-podge for the Center and not be compatible for the overall picture. Staff's recommendation's would be a possible solution. Mr. Baker stated they could review the recommendation. 9. Commissioner Butler asked if the trash containers could be moved to the property line. Staff stated future plans for this area called for development and it would also be an inconvenient location. Discussion followed regarding the location of the trash container. 10. Commissioner Butler asked if the awning coloring surrounding the building could be minimized and the portion facing the Center eliminated. Commissioner Anderson stated he thought keeping the proposed striping and colors of the awning on the east elevation, was the most important as it was the entryway. He also suggested the down lighting on the east elevation would enhance the visibility of the facade and the landscaping. 11. Commissioner Tyler asked how the interior dimensions of the restaurant compared to their Palm Desert store. Mr. Baker stated the Palm Desert Market was a larger building developed for an expanded use. Commissioner Tyler asked if the two pickup windows posed any problems. Mr. Baker stated it was no problem. Commissioner Tyler -asked if the applicant was comfortable with the color scheme of the building. Staff clarified it was only the band they were requesting the color change on. Commissioner Tyler stated he too felt the trash location was a nuisance. 12. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public hearing. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Gardner to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-032 approving certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Conditional Use Permit 96-027. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, Woodard, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. PC8-13 10 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Gardner to adopt Minute Motion 96-026 approving Conditional Use Permit 96-027, subject to conditions as modified. 15. Commissioner Anderson stated he agreed with staff s recommendation on the east elevation to maintain the proposed awning colors and design. He also agreed with the applicant that the addition of the down lighting would be an accent to the entry. 16. Commissioner Woodard stated he agreed with Commissioner Anderson, but if every building had its own color identification, it would make for a pandoras box for any future developments in the Center. He agreed with staffs recommendation regarding the elimination of internal illumination of the awning and thought the down lighting should be added. 17. Staff suggested that Condition #7 be modified to allow down lighting and staff would approve the solid color of the awning and allow striping of the awning only at the entry. Commissioners agreed with the condition change. 18. Unanimously approved. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Conditional Use Permit 95-017. Amendment #1; a request of La Quinta Car Wash f'or approval of an outdoor shade structure on the north side of the existing car wash within the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report. A copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Tyler asked if the awning was to be permanent or taken down during the season. Staff stated it was to be permanent and had a five to seven year life expectancy. 3. Commissioner Woodard asked about the purpose of the awning. Staff explained it was to assist in the drying of the vehicles. Due to the heat, the water was drying on the vehicles. before they could be hand dried. 4. Chairman Abels clarified that the car wash operates in such a manner that no car will be there for no more than 15 minutes. PC8-13 I 1 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 Element of the La Quinta General Plan, and recommending that the City Council consider for inclusion in the Street Vacation Resolution, those conditions outlined within Exhibit "A". Unanimously approved. C. Plot Plan 93-500, Amendment #1; a request of Landau Development for approval of three prototypes for construction. l . Planning Manager Christine di Iorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Woodard asked for clarification of the elevations and the number of floor plans. Staff stated the applicant could clarify this. Commissioner Woodard asked if there were any plotting requirements. Staff stated there were none. Mr. Erve Green, Landau Development Company, stated the floor plans will be identical to those approved in the past. The changes they are making were only to the architectural design of the elevations. There are 12 houses built in the Avanti series constructed by another developer. Landau will be building 11 of the 38 remaining. There are three floor plans for the Coronado units which currently have building permits pulled. The remainder of lots are under an option. He then submitted a letter from the Architectural Committee for Lake La Quinta which approved the elevations as proposed. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked if the three units under construction were the Coronado floor plan. Mr. Green stated it was a reverse Coronado plan with some variation. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern about the placement of air conditioning condensers outside the bedroom windows. Mr. Green stated they had no objection to change their location. 5. Commissioner Woodard asked for clarification on the number of elevations that were being proposed. Mr. Green stated the Coronado plan would be changed to the proposed elevations. Commissioner Woodard asked what the other six elevations would be and if they would be constructed next to each other or dispersed through the development. Mr. Green explained where they would be located. 6. Commissioner Woodard asked if Mr. Green would be plotting the units. Mr. Green stated they would not place the same elevation next to each other as this would not be attractive to the development. Commissioner Woodard stated he too was concerned about the air conditioning condenser being located next to the bedrooms. PCs-13 13 Planning Commission Meeting August 13, 1996 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Anderson/Gardner to adopt Minute Motion 96-029, recommending approval of Plot 93-500, Amendment #1, to the City Council, subject to conditions. Commissioner Butler asked if staff would be approving the elevations. Staff stated they would approve them. Unanimously approved. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioner Tyler reported on the City Council meeting of August 6, 1996. B. Department update - None C. Commissioner Gardner asked about the new Agenda format. Staff explained the agenda and how its format was determined. IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Gardner/Tyler to adjourn this meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting on September 24, 1996. This regular meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:34 P.M. Unanimously approved. PC8-13 14 PH # 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-025 REQUEST: APPROVAL OF INSTALLATION OF SIX PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE (PCS) ANTENNAS AND TWO RADIO EQUIPMENT CABINETS WITH TWO ALTERNATIVE SITES BEING CONSIDERED. LOCATION: ALTERNATIVE SITE 1: 50-855 WASHINGTON STREET - LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER ALTERNATIVE SITE 2: 78-140 CALLE TAMPICO - PLAZA TAMPICO APPLICANT: PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES (PBMS) PROPERTY OWNER: ALTERNATIVE SITE 1: LA QUINTA VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - JOSEPH W. RICH, GENERAL PARTNER ALTERNATIVE SITE 2: LA QUINTA MEDICAL COMMERCIAL PLAZA REPRESENTATIVE: PLANCOM, INC (DARRELL DAUGHERTY) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: EA 96-322 HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT WHICH ANALYZES BOTH ALTERNATIVE SITE LOCATIONS. IT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED THAT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT BE CERTIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT. NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS DEEMED NECESSARY. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ALTERNATIVE SITE 1: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) ALTERNATIVE SITE 2: VILLAGE COMMERCIAL (VC) pclm.102 ZONING: ALTERNATIVE SITE 1: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CN) (formerly - General Commercial - CP) ALTERNATIVE SITE 2: VILLAGE NORTH (VN) (formerly - Commercial Village North - C-V-N) The originally requested project site is the La Quinta Village Shopping Center, located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Calle Tampico and Washington Street (Attachment: 1). The shopping center is a fully developed neighborhood commercial center with a variety of retail and food establishments. The specific location for the proposed project is the existing tower element above the Soul of Asia restaurant. [Pripurd • •a The alternative site being requested by the applicant is the Plaza Tampico professional office building complex located on the north side of Calle Tampico, approximately midway between Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive, adjacent to the west side of Seasons Way (Attachment 1). The property is fully developed with two two-story office buildings, parking lot areas, and a three-story tower element. The building was constructed a number of years ago. The applicant is proposing to install the six antennas on top of the tower element. Surrounding ZoningJLand Uses The adjacent land uses and zoning designations for Alternative Site 1 are as follows: North Vacant South Civic Center East Residential West Residential RM - Medium Density Residential MC - Major Community Facilities RL - Low Density Residential RM - Medium Density Residential The adjacent land uses and zoning designations for Alternative Site 2 are as follows: Land Uses: North School South Residential/vacant East Senior Housing West Vacant RM - Medium Density Residential VR-10,000 - Village Residential RM - Medium Density Residential VN - Village North port,,. t 02 Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) is proposing to install six Personal Communication Services (PCS) wireless antennas and two equipment cabinets within an existing tower element (Attachment 2). The tower element is located on the roof of the building which presently houses the Soul of Asia restaurant and Pizza Hut, among other businesses. In order to install the antennas, it will be necessary to increase the height of the tower an additional eleven feet. This would increase the total building height from 42 to 53 feet. The applicant proposes to totally shield the antennas from public view with all equipment installed inside the tower. The area PBMS intends to lease from the property owners totals 400 square feet. the facility will be unmanned and always operating. Once or twice a month a service technician will inspect the equipment. The equipment cabinets (BTS Units) will be installed inside the tower. These cabinets are constructed of metal, and are 5'-3" high x 2'-5" deep x 4'-3" wide. Engineering certifications pertaining to the structural soundness and electromagnetic emissions have been submitted for the proposed antennas and equipment, and are found as Attachments 3 and 4. WIN The alternative site requires mounting of the six PCS antennas on top of an existing three-story architectural tower element that is 37 feet high (Attachment 5). The two- story building is 33' 8" at the roof top. The proposed 11 foot high antennas would rise above the top of the tower 6' 6" to reach a total height of 43' 6" above the ground. No modification will be necessary to the tower element. The antennas would be installed in three clusters and be the same model and design as that proposed for Alternative Site 1. Radiometric studies of this site indicate that the requested height is needed in order for the electromagnetic signals to clear trees and buildings on the near vicinity. Two BTS equipment cabinets are proposed to be installed on the roof of the building down in the parapet well. The cabinets will be screened from view at the proposed roof -top location. The same size and model of BTS cabinets are proposed for this site as are proposed for Alternative Site 1. The equipment cabinets will be inspected and serviced on a monthly basis with access provided by roof hatches from inside the building. p0m.102 1.a,'� •72. ' i • 11 •l The antennas will create a PBMS PCS network site that will provide coverage to communities in California and Nevada. PBMS has obtained the necessary approvals from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Staff has asked for copies of the approvals as is required by Ordinance 248 - Standards for Commercial Communications Towers and Related Structures. The applicant has prepared a detailed project summary and description (Attachment 6) which explains the technology of the new digital PCS wireless system. The primary difference between the PCS and cellular systems is that the PCS will route calls to people instead of places, and can be integrated with existing wireless telephone services. The increase in height of the tower may be incompatible with the buildings in the shopping center due to disproportionate height with building mass. The applicant has submitted two photometric simulations (Attachment 7) of what the increase in tower height would look like if constructed. One simulation shows the view from the Civic Center, and the other shows the view from the corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico as requested by staff. It appears from the simulations that the increase in height would be obviously noticeable in comparison with the mass and height of the buildings within the shopping center. The tower would be the tallest feature in the center. To mitigate the increase in height, the applicant is proposing to place a lattice circle feature on the face of the tower to break up the expanse of plain wall. The architectural design of the Plaza Tampico office building and tower is that of wood -frame construction, with stucco exterior finish, tile roof, and multi -paned windows. The upper story cantilevers over the lower story to provide a pedestrian walkway with columns. The tower element is three stories high with clay tile roof and open cut-out areas on the upper two stories. The tower is located along the north elevation of the building, 150 feet back from the front property line. With the tower tucked back away from the front of the building, the antennas will be less noticeable to passersby along Calle Tampico. Photographs with computer -generated simulations of what the tower will look like with the antennas on top have been submitted for review (Attachment 8). pc1m.102 This project requires an approved Conditional Use Permit, which shall be granted only if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Conditions of Approval are attached as necessary to ensure community health and safety. If a Conditional Use Permit is granted, it must be used within one year from the effective date of approval or the permit will be null and void. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must be pursued diligently to completion. The permit may be revoked upon the findings and procedure contained in Chapter 9.148 of the current Zoning Ordinance. This case was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on September 3, 1996. All property owners within 500-feet of both alternative sites were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required. Staff transmitted a copy of the applicant's request to all public agencies and City departments on May 21,1996. Responses were received from CVWD, IID, the Fire Marshall, and the Building & Safety Department. We received no negative comments. All other comments have been incorporated into the attached draft conditions of approval. Any last minute correspondence received will be provided to the Commissioners at the meeting. Environmental Assessment 96-322 was prepared for this Conditional Use Permit during the review process of both alternative sites. The Assessment identified only one potential concern with Alternative Site 1, that of aesthetics. The increase in tower height required for Alternative Site 1 may slightly impact the viewshed to the Santa Rosa and Coral Reef Mountains as defined in the General Plan. This potential impact is not significant, but rather will be a cumulative impact. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for both proposed site locations will be recommended for certification. The photo simulation of the tower at Alternative Site 1 taken from the corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico does indicate that the increase in tower height will impact the local viewshed of the Santa Rosa Mountains and the Coral Reef Mountains. The impact is not significant, but it is cumulative. Health risks have been proven to be minuscule as indicated in the electromagnetic field evaluation. pc1m.102 ' Staff has reviewed both Alternative Sites 1 and 2 as requested by Pacific Bell Mobile Services and does not find any cause for concern pertaining to health risk issues for either location. Aesthetically, Alternative Site 1 would result in an incompatibility with the architectural scale and mass of the existing buildings in the shopping center, as the increase in tower height would result in a relatively tall, thin element on top of low, massive buildings. Alternative Site 2 will not require any increase in existing building or tower height, as the existing tower is three stories high providing for good reception and transmission by the antennas. Staff does not support a recommendation for approval of Alternative Site 1 because of the architectural incompatibilities, but does support a recommendation for approval of Alternative Site 2, subject to the Recommended Conditions of Approval. The findings necessary to approve Alternative Site 2 of this Conditional Use Permit can be made as noted in the report. The Conditions of Approval ensure that the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and provide an architecturally compatible installation plan for the proposed antennas. 1. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-_ certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and, 2. Adopt Minute Motion 96- approving Alternative Site 2 for Conditional Use Permit 96-025, subject to conditions. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Plans and Exhibits - Alternative Site 1 (for Planning Commission only) 3. Structural Information 4. Electromagnetic Emission Analysis 5. Plans and Exhibits - Alternative Site 2 (for Planning Commission only) 6. PS System Information 7. Photometric Simulations - Alternative Site 1 8. Photometric Simulations - Alternative Site 2 Prepared by: LESLIE J:' MOURIQUAND 'Associate Planner Submitted by: CHRISTINE DI IORIO Planning Manager p0m. 102 a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Assessment No. 96-322 Case No. CUP 96-025 Date: June 3,1996; amended 8129196 L Name of Proponent: Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) Address: 2955 Red Hill Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714-825-8088 (Darrell Daugherty, Rep. - PLANCOM, Inc.) Agency Requiring Checklist: City of La Quinta Project Name (if applicable): Conditional Use Permit 96-025, PCS antenna installation in tower structure at the La Quinta Village Shopping Center, with an alternate location proposed at the Plaza Tampico Medical Building tower rooftop. CITY OF LA QUINTA Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population and Housing Biological Resources Utilities Earth Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics Water Risk of Upset and Human Health Cultural Resources Air Quality Noise H Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance IIL DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL DAPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least, 1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a `potentially significant impact" or `potentially significant unless mitigated". AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signature Date June 3, 1996 Printed Name and Title 'Wallace Nesbit Associate Planner For: Citv of La Ouinta, Community Development Department KI ll i Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Signifi—t No Impact Mitigated hmpact Impact 3.1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (source #(s): X b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? X c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible Rand uses)? X d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? X 3.2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? X b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? X c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? X 3.3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? X b) Seismic ground shaking X c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X e) Landslides or mudflows? X f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? X g) Subsidence of the land? X Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact h) Expansive soils? X i) Unique geologic or physical features? X 3.4. WATER. Would the project result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? X c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity'? X d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? X f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? X g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? X h) Impacts to groundwater quality? X 3.5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any air quality standard, or contribute to any existing or projected air quality violation? X b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? X c) Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? X d) Create objectional odors? X iv Q Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the project result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? x b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? x c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? x d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site? X e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? x f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? x g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? x 3.7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? x b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? x c) Locally designated natural communities, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? x d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 3.8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact �1. K X 3.9. RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? } b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? K c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? K d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? K e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? K 3.10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? X b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? K 3.11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? F vi Y Potentially Potentially significant Less 7Lan Significant Unless significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X 3.12. UTILITIES. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X b) Communications systems? X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? X d) Sewer or septic tanks? X e) Storm water drainage? X f) Solid waste disposal? X 3.13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X c) Create light or glare? X 3.14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? X b) Disturb archaeological resources? X c) Affect historical resources? X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X 3.15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? Potentially Potentially Significant Less Tl— Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X 4. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? X c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. INITIAL STUDY - ADDENDUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-322 PREPARED FOR: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-025 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES 2955 RED HII.L AVENUE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 714-825-8192 PREPARED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 June 6,1996 Revised August 26, 1996 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Project Overview 3 1.2 Purpose of Initial Study 3 1.3 Background of Environmental Review 4 1.4 Summary of Preliminary Environmental Review 4 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 2.1 Project Location and Environmental Setting 4 2.2 Physical Characteristics 4 2.3 Operational Characteristics 5 2.4 Objectives 5 2.5 Discretionary Actions 5 2.6 Related Projects 5 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5 3.1 Land Use and Planning 6 3.2 Population and Housing 7 3.3 Earth Resources 7 3.4 Water 9 3.5 Air Quality 10 3.6 Transportation/Circulation 10 3.7 Biological Resources 11 3.8 Energy and Mineral Resources 11 3.9 Risk of Upset/Human Health 11 3.10 Noise 13 3.11 Public Services 13 3.12 Utilities 14 3.13 Aesthetics 14 3.14 Cultural Resources 15 3.15 Recreation 16 4 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 16 5 EARLIER ANALYSIS 17 3 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The City has received an application for a Personal Communications Service (PCS) wireless communications facility in an extended tower feature of the building shell at the La Quinta Village Shopping Center, at the northwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. The existing tower structure along the west building elevation will be heightened about 10 feet above its current roof line; all equipment and antennae will be enclosed within the structure. The applicant indicates that PCS technology is rapidly emerging and will allow more lightweight, easy -to -use and less expensive mobile communication through its digital technology. As an alternative location, the applicant has submitted plans for a site on the roof of the Plaza Tampico Medical Office, approximately 114 mile west of the original site. The proposed paddle -type antennae are located atop the tower feature of the medical building, extending 6.5feet above the roofline. This alternative was proposed as a result of staff concerns with aesthetic issues associated with heightening the tower structure at the La Quinta Village Shopping Center. The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency for the project review, as defined by Section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A lead agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility four carrying out or approving a project which may have a significant effect upon the environment. The City of La Quinta, as the Lead Agency, has the authority to oversee the environmental review and to approve the proposed development. 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY As part of the environmental review for the proposed project, the City of La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared this Initial Study. This document provides a basis for determining the nature and scope of the subsequent review for the project. The purposes of the Initial Study, as stated in Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, include the following: • To provide the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) or a Negative Declaration for the project; • To enable the applicant or the City of La Quinta to modify the project, mitigating adverse effects before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact status; • To assist in the preparation of an EIR, should one be required, by focusing the analysis on potentially significant impacts of the project; • To facilitate environmental review early in the design of the project; 4 • To provide documentation for the findings in a negative declaration that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; • To eliminate unnecessary EIR's; and • To determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. 1.3 BACKGROUND OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was deemed subject to the environmental review requirements of CEQA. The Environmental Officer for the Community Development Department prepared this Initial Study and addendum for review and certification by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta. 1.4 SUMMARY OF PRELE IINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This Initial Study indicates that there is no potential for significant environmental impacts, relative to issue areas as identified in the Environmental Checklist. However, standard mitigation (conditions) is usually required of all project types. Mitigation measures have been recommended in a Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) which will reduce any potential impacts to insignificant levels. As a result, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be recommended for this project. Mitigation measures proposed for each issue area are underlined within the discussion, and are summarized in the Mitigation Monitoring Prop -ram attached to this addendum. Any changes made by the applicant to the project as a result of this assessment, design review or other reason, which would necessitate changes to this addendum, are shown in italics as part of the issue area which any such changes may affect. SECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City of La Quinta is a 31.18 square mile municipality located in the southwestern portion of the Coachella Valley. The City is bounded on the west by the City of Indian Wells, on the east by the City of Indio and Riverside County, on the north by the City of Palm Desert and Riverside County, and federal and county lands to the south. The City of La Quinta was incorporated in May 1982. The City is surrounded on the west and south by the Santa Rosa and Coral Reef Mountains, respectively, creating a natural barrier which impedes reception of various transmitted signals. 2.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The proposal is sited within an existing shopping center, and will be enclosed within an existing tower, which will be increased in height to accommodate the antenna as proposed. All equipment associated with the project will be enclosed within the structure and will not be visible from any angle of view to the tower. The equipment consists of six antennae and an electrical equipment cabinet. The proposed project alternative places the equipment and antennae on the roof of a two-story medical office building,1,14 mile west of the originally proposed site. No screening is proposed, and the paddles will be about 6.5 feet above the roofline. The applicant has requested that both sites be analyzed under this environmental assessment, as a final decision on the ultimate location has not been made at this point. 2.3 OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS The proposed antennae and equipment will not be accessible or visible to the public. It will require its own electrical and telephone service. The related equipment will require periodic maintenance one to two times per month.. 2.4 OBJECTIVES The objective of the project is to provide the capability for expanding mobile telecommunication services through increased areas of coverage, improvement of coverage in areas with diverse topography and accommodating heavier service demands. 2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS A discretionary action is an action taken by a government agency (for this project, the government agency is the City of La Quinta) that calls for the exercise of judgment in deciding whether to approve a project. The proposed project will require discretionary approval from the Planning Commission for the following: Certification of the Environmental Assessment for the project. Approval of Conditional Use Permit 96-025. 2.6 RELATED PROJECTS There are no current projects pending on either site. However, there have been previous project approval requests for both sites, with additional development still pending subject to further approvals. SECTION 3: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the establishment of this facility. CEQA issue areas are evaluated in this addendum as contained in the Initial Study Checklist. Under each checklist item, the environmental setting is discussed, including a description of conditions as they presently exist within the City and the areas affected by the proposed project. Thresholds for significance are defined either by standards adopted by responsible or trustee agencies or by referring to criteria in CEQA - Appendix G. G 3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, in the eastern portion of Riverside County. The valley is abundant with both plant and animal life. Topographical relief ranges from 237 feet below mean sea level (msl) to about 2,000 feet above msl. The valley is surrounded by the San Jacinto Mountains, the Santa Rosa Mountains, the Orocopia Mountains, and the San Bernardino Mountains. The San Andreas fault transects the northeastern edge of the valley. Local Environmental Setting. The originally proposed project site is located northwest of the intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico, within a neighborhood shopping center. The project site is generally within the central portion of the City. There are existing single family homes nearby, across Washington Street and to the east. The site is developed with commercial structures, one of which will house the proposed equipment. The alternative site is located on top of a commercial office complex, on a tower feature at the front of the building which faces into (i.e. westerly) the overall site. A. Would the project conflict with the general plan designation or zoning? No Impact The original project site is currently zoned C-P (General Commercial), with a General Plan designation ofNeighborhood Commercial. The City has revised the entire Zoning Code; this site will be zoned CN (Neighborhood Commercial) effective September S, 1996. The alternative site at Plaza Tampico is currently zoned C-V--N, soon to be VN, which is essentially unchanged from the current designation. The rezoning will not affect the proposed application requirements or processing. B. Would the project conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? No Impact. The City of La Quinta has jurisdiction over this project. The primary environmental plans and policies related to development of the project are identified in the La Quinta General Plan (LQGP), the La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment (LQMEA), and other previously prepared documents (see Earlier Analysis section). Both sites are within Redevelopment Area #1, which generally incorporates the southerly portion of the City. The redevelopment plan for the City relies upon the General Plan to indicate the location and extent of permitted development. As a result, the development of the project is also consistent with the adopted Redevelopment Plan. C. Would the project affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? No Impact The sites are developed with commercial uses; as such, there are no agricultural operation in existence. 7 D. Would the project disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income minority community)? No Impact. The proposed communication equipment will not have any disruptive or divisive impacts on the surrounding areas. 'There will be no changes to existing land uses or any physical changes which could cause any such impacts. 3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSING Regional Environmental Setting. Between 1980 and 1990, the population of La Quinta expanded 125%, as reported by the U.S. Census, making it the second fastest growing city in the Coachella Valley. The number of permanent residents increased from 4,992 to 11,215.These figures are based upon information provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the State Department of Finance, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). The City's population as of January 1996 is estimated by the State Department of Finance to be 18,046 persons. The housing stock as of October 1995, is listed at 9,080 single family units, 173 multi -family units, and 247 mobile homes, for a total of 9,500 units. Local Environmental Setting. The proposed project sites are located in established commercial areas. Both sites are surrounded by residential, commercial and golf course development. A. Would the project cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? No Impact. The proposed communication equipment will not generate any additional population. It is not anticipated that any impacts on the population as projected by the LQGP will occur due to this project. B. Would the project induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? No Impact. The proposed equipment is necessary to allow expansion of digital communication services in the area. This expansion of service is not anticipated to induce any substantial physical growth. C. Would the project displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? No Impact. There are no housing units currently on either proposed project site; there are housing units in the vicinity of both sites. The proposal will not have any impact which would displace existing housing in the area. 3.3 EARTH RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta has a varied topography, from gently sloping alluvial fans and steep hillsides, to relatively flat desert floor. The alluvial soils that make up most of the City's soil types are underlain by 8 igneous -metamorphic rock, as seen in outcrops in the Santa Rosa Mountains and the Coral Reef Mountains. Soils on the Valley floor are made up of very fine grain unconsolidated silty sands. Faults in the area include the San Andreas fault located several miles to the north of the City. Local Environmental Setting. The project sites are near the historical center of the City. Both sites are developed with commercial uses and incorporate stormwater retention facilities as required by City standards. Faults within the City include two inferred faults transecting the southern section of La Quinta. One is located approximately 1.25 miles east of the project site; the other is roughly 1.75 miles south. No recorded activity from these faults has occurred (Source: LQGP; LQMEA). A. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismicity or fault rupture? Less Than Significant Impact. There will be no housing or other habitable space established with the proposal. However, heightening the existing tower at the original site could increase potential hazard due to any structural failure associated with seismic activity. All proposed structural improvements shall be constructed to current UBC seismic standards as mitigation. B. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismic ground shaldng? Less Than Significant Impact. Same response as 3.3.A. C. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismicity/ground failure or liquefaction? No Impact. The proposed project sites are not anticipated to be subject to ground failure hazards from earthquake or other events. The La Quinta General Plan indicates that these sites are not within a recognized liquefaction hazard area. The majority of the City has a very low liquefaction susceptibility due to the fact that ground water levels are generally at least 100 feet below the ground surface (Source: LQMEA). D. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismicity, seiche or tsunami or volcanic hazard? No Impact. The City is located inland from the Pacific Ocean, with mountains ranges in between the ocean and the desert valley. Tsunamis would not impact the desert in any known way. Seiches and volcanic activity are not experienced in the desert. Lake Cahuilla, a man-made reservoir, is located in the City limits but is several miles south of the project site; any breach from this facility could not impact either site. E. Would the project result in or expose people to potentialimpacts involving landslides or mudslides? 2 No Impact. Both sites are flat and located in the open desert area, approximately 1.25 miles away from the Santa Rosa hillsides. Thus, the project would not be impacted by potential mudslides or landslides. F. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? No Impact. The proposed project will not require any earthwork. The equipment will be located within a modified tower structure in an existing building, or on top of the existing Plaza Tampico. G. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving subsidence of the land? Less than Significant Impact. Neither site is located in an area which is considered to have a subsidence hazard, according to the La Quinta MEk Dynamic settlement results in geologically seismic areas where poorly consolidated soils nix with perched groundwater causing dramatic decreases in the elevation of the ground. These sites are not identified as being in such an area (Source: LQMEA). 1L Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving expansive soils? Less Than Significant Impact. The underlying soils on the sites have a low potential for expansion; the proposed project will not be subject to problems associated with soil expansion. L Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving unique geologic or physical features? No Impact. The project does not involve any potential for impacts associated with any geologic or physical features. 3.4 WATER Regional Environmental Setting. Groundwater resources in the La Quinta area consist of a system of large aquifers (porous layer of rock material) and groundwater basins separated by bedrock or layers of soil that trap or retain groundwater. La Quinta is located primarily in the lower Thermal Subarea of the groundwater basin. The Thermal Subarea is separated into the upper and lower valley sub -basins near Point Happy Ranch, located southwest of the intersection of Washington Street and State Highway 111. Water supplies are also augmented with surface water from the Colorado River transported via the Coachella Canal. Local Environmental Setting. - Both potential sites are developed with commercial uses and adequate drainage facilities to control storm and nuisance waters A through H. No Impact The project will not increase the amount of impervious area within the site. The site is developed with the necessary flood control facilities which were required when the site was developed. The equipment proposed will not create flood hazard impacts. The proposal will not result 10 in any additional runoff from the project site. The proposal will not result in a condition which would increase any water levels or runoff. 3.5 AIR QUALITY Regional Environmental Setting. The Coachella Valley is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and in particular the Southeast Desert Air Basin (SEDAB). SEDAB has a distinctly different air pollution problem than the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). A discussion of the air quality conditions, jurisdictional organization and requirements is found in the La Quinta MEA. In the Coachella Valley, the standards for PM 10 are frequently exceeded. PM 10 is particulate matter that is 10 microns or less in diameter that becomes suspended in the air due to winds, grading activity, and by vehicles on unpaved roads, among other causes. Local Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta is located in the lower Coachella Valley, which has an and climate, characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent and low annual rainfall, and low humidity. The City is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 30, which includes two air quality monitoring stations, one located in the City of Palm Springs and the other in the City of Indio. The Indio station monitors conditions which are most representative of the La Quinta area. The station has been collecting data for ozone and particulate matter since 1983. The Palm Springs station monitors carbon monoxide in addition to ozone and particulate matter and has been in operation since 1985. In 1995, a third station was set up in North Palm Springs to strictly sample PM10 based solely on natural blowsand events. This information will help determine the amount of exceedance which occurs due to non-anthropogenic causes of PM 10. A through D. No Impact. It is not anticipated that there will be any air quality impacts associated with the operation of the proposed equipment. 3.6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Regional Environmental Setting. La Quinta is a desert community of over 18,000 permanent residents. The existing circulation system is a combination of early roadwork constructed by Riverside County and new roadways since incorporation of the City in 1982. Key roadways include State Highway 111, Washington Street, Jefferson Street, Fred Waring Drive, and Eisenhower Drive. Existing transit service for La Quinta is limited to three regional fixed -route bus routes operated by Sunline Transit Agency. There are some existing pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian facilities in La Quinta, however, these systems are minimal at present and are to be completed as new developments are constructed in the City. Local Environmental Setting. The project site is northwest of the Calle Tampico/Washington Street intersection. The shopping center has all paving and parking lot improvements in place. The alternate site is at the northwest corner of Seasons Way and Calle Tampico. Approximately one-half of the site is paved with parking/circulation improvements with the existing office building. 11 A Through G. No Impact. The proposed equipment will not generate any additional traffic. No traffic related impacts in any of these issue areas can be associated with the proposal. 3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta lies within the Colorado Desert. Two ecosystems are found within the City: the Sonoran Desert Scrub and the Desert Transition. The disturbed environments are classified as urban or agricultural. A discussion of these ecosystems is found in the La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment. Local Environmental Setting. - Both sites are developed with commercial uses. Street improvements have been completed within and around the sites. There is a limited amount of vegetation which was imported as part of development of the sites. A through D. No Impact. The proposal will not involve disturbance of any area not already disturbed by development. The equipment will be located entirely within or atop an existing structure located in an existing commercial complex. 3.8 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta contains both areas of insignificant and significant Mineral Aggregate Resources Areas (SMARA), as designated by the State Department of Conservation. There are no known oil resources in the City. Major energy resources used in the City come from the Imperial Irrigation District (IID), Southern California Gas Company, and gasoline companies. Local Environmental Setting. There are no oil wells or other fuel or energy producing resources on either proposed project site. Both sites are shown as MRZ-1, a designation for areas where there are no significant resources present, or it is determined that little likelihood exists for their presence (Source: LQMEA). A, B. No Impact. Installation, operation and maintenance of the equipment will not impact any aspect related to mineral resources. 3.9 RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH Regional Environmental Setting. Recent growth pressure has dramatically increased the City's exposure to hazardous materials. Such exposure to toxic materials can occur through the air, in drinking water, in food, in drugs and cosmetics, and in the work place. Although large scale, hazardous waste generating employment is not yet located within La Quinta, the existence of chemicals utilized in dry cleaning operations, agricultural operations, restaurant kitchen cleaning, landscape irrigation and exposure to large electrical facilities may pose significant threats to various sectors of the population. Currently, there are no hazardous disposal waste 12 sites located in Riverside County. Transportation of such materials out of and around La Quinta takes place. Local Environmental Setting. In order to comply with AB 2948-Hazardous Waste Management Plans and Facility Siting Procedures, the City of La Quinta adopted Ordinance 184 consisting of a Hazardous Waste Management Plan. The project site is currently developed with a commercial shopping center. A. Would the project involve a risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? Less Than Significant Impact. There is only minimal risk from potential emissions associated with operation of the PCS digital antennae. This technology is represented as less intensive due to its re -use, or recycling, of radio channels between non -adjacent facilities. No other risks have been identified or are anticipated. According to Pacific Bell, PCS transmitters, by design and operation, are low -power devices. Even under maximum exposure conditions where all channels are operating at full power (a rare occurrence), public exposure from a PCS facility is typically —1 microW/cm2 (micro -watts per square centimeter). This level of exposure is more than 1,200 times lower than the current ANSI or National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) public exposure standards, and about 20 times less than a standard household microwave oven. A report prepared by Richard Tell Associates, Inc. for the original site at La Quinta Village Shopping Center, shows that the emissions associated with the equipment propased for this PCS station will achieve a maximum value of 0.936 microWlcm2. This value also would apply to the alternate site at Plaza Tampico, and is indicative that radiofrequency levels will not present any significant risk B. Would the project involve possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. Establishment of the equipment will serve to assist in communications associated with emergency response situations. There will be no adverse impacts. C. Would the project involve the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Less Than Significant Impact Refer to 3.9.A. There are no anticipated health hazards associated with the proposed equipment location. The anticipated emissions associated with the proposed digital PCS technology are seen as minimal, and should not pose a significant potential hazard to area residents and employees. D. Would the project involve exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? No Impact. There are no existing health hazards on the proposed project site. The proposed project does not involve habitable areas which upon occupation would expose people to any existing health hazard potential. E. Would the proposal involve increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? 13 No Impact The proposed project will be sited inside an existing tower feature or on a rooftop as part of an existing commercial center. No vegetation is proximate to the location. 3.10 NOISE Regional Environmental Setting. Noise levels in the City are created by a variety of sources in and near the City. The major sources include vehicular noise on City streets and Highway 111, and temporary construction noises. The ambient noise levels are dominated by vehicular noise along the highway and major arterials. Local Environmental Setting. - The ambient noise level at the project site is dominated by vehicular traffic noise from Washington Street and Calle Tampico, the closest major arterials to the subject sites. The sites are not considered a noise - sensitive land use. Residential uses are located east across Washington Street and directly west of the project site at La Quinta Village Center, and east of the Plaza Tampico site. An elementary school is also under construction to the north. (Source: Site Survey; LQMEA). A. B. No Impact It is not anticipated that there will be any measurable increase in existing noise levels resulting from the equipment location. The proposed sites are commercial areas; installation and operation of the equipment should not impact existing noise levels, and will not create any exposure to severe noise levels. 3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES Regional Environmental Setting. - Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department extends service to the City from existing facilities located in the City of Indio. Fire protection services are provided to the City by Riverside County Fire Department. The Fire Department administers two stations in the City: Station #32 on Old Avenue 52, at Ave. Bermudas, and Station #70, at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54. Desert Sands Unified School District and Coachella Valley Unified School District serve the City. There are two elementary schools (one existing, one under construction), one middle school, and one high school with the City. These schools are with the Desert Sands Unified School District. The City is also within the College of the Desert Community College District. Library services are provided by the Riverside County Library System with a branch library located in the Village area of the City. The existing library opened in 1988 and contains 2,065 square feet of space and approximately 18,000 volumes. Health care services are provided to the City through JFK Memorial Hospital in Indio, and the Eisenhower Immediate Care Facility located in the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. The 14 Eisenhower Immediate Care Facility is a satellite clinic of the Eisenhower Medical Center, located in Rancho Mirage. (Source: LQMEA; LQGP.) Local Environmental Setting. The nearest fire station to the project is Station #32, located approximately 1 mile southwest of the project site on Frances Hack Lane. Governmental services in La Quinta are provided by City staff at the Civic Center and by County, State, and Federal agency offices in the desert region. A new elementary school is under construction west of the site on the north side of Calle Tampico. A through E. No Impact. The proposed equipment will not have an impact on any governmental or other public services. The equipment will only require electrical service, which exists at the site, and will be maintained by Pacific Bell. 3.12 (UTILITIES Regional Environmental Setting. - The City of La Quinta is served by the Imperial Irrigation District (]ID) for electrical power supply and the Southern California Gas Company (SCG) for natural gas service. Existing power and gas lines and substations are found throughout the City. General Telephone Exchange (GTE) provides telephone services for the City. Continental CableVision services the area for cable television service. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides water and sewer service to the city, as well as maintaining storm water facilities in the City. CVWD obtains its water from underground aquifers and from the Colorado River. The City is served by Waste Management of the Desert for solid waste disposal. Nonhazardous, mixed municipal solid waste is taken to three landfills within the Coachella Valley. Local Environmental Setting. All utilities exist at both project sites. A through 1% No Impact. The equipment will not require any new or altered utility systems. The required electrical service already exists at the buildings which will house the equipment. 3.13 AESTHETICS Regional Environmental Setting: The City of La Quinta is partially located within a desert valley cove. There are hillsides to the west and south of the City. Views of the desert and surrounding mountains are prevalent on clear days throughout most of the City. Local Environmental Setting. According to the LQMEA, both sites are in the path of a distinctive viewshed emanating from the area north of 50th Avenue and west of the sites. The area between both sites and the viewshed is almost entirely developed with one and two story structures; both sites are developed with commercial/retail buildings. Therefore, there is some cumulative impact on the viewshed. ii , 15 Less Than Significant ]impact. The project is proposed to be located in a significantly developed residential and commercial area in the central portion of the City. The proposed project at the original site location will incorporate an addition of 11 feet in height to an existing 42 foot tower structure. This increase to 53 feet will add to the visibility of the tower and detract from the overall massing and scale of the building it is part of However, it should not significantly impact the existing viewshed, in relation to the currently existing shopping center development. The alternate site at Plaza Tampico will not add further to any existing building mass. The antennae will only extend about 6.5 feet above the existing roofline, and are only about 6 inches wide and 3 inches thick The height to the top edge of the tower is shown on the plans as 37 feet; it is 43.5 feet to the top of .the antennae. The additional height and mass associated with these antennae are not seen to be significant in impacting the viewshed. B. Would the project have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will be located inside an extension of an existing tower feature. The extension has been designed so as to be architecturally consistent with the overall building. However, it will add to the visibility of the tower and detract from the overall massing and scale of the building it is part of. The tower extension shall incorporate architectural components and treatment to achieve a consistent appearance and integrity with the original existing building scale and architecture. to include plant -on or pop -out features, false window or balcony areas. and so forth If feasible, the equipment platform shall be lowered to reduce tower height and still achieve adequate elevation for equipment gVeration. The alternate site at Plaza Tampico will have a negligible aesthetic impact due to the minimal mass and limited additional height associated with it's installation. The only potential impact relates to visual appearance. The antennae structures shall be painted a neutral color in order to reduce visibility and blend in against the surrounding environment. C. Would the project create light or glare? No Impact. The proposal does not incorporate any lighting as part of the current approval request, though securityor other lighting could be requested later. Any proposed lighting fixtures would have to comply with provisions of the Outdoor Light Control Ordinance, through review by the Community Development Department prior to any installations. 3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting. The most likely locations of prehistoric cultural resources in the La Quinta area are along the foothills. However, many sites have been found on the open desert floor area Isolated milling features, sparse lithic scatters, and isolated pottery scatters have been found throughout the City. 16 The settling of La Quinta area has been chronicled by the La Quinta Historical Society in several publications and museum exhibits. There are 13 designated historical structures and sites recorded on the California Historic Resources Inventory. These resources are listed in the La Quinta General Plan. Local Environmental Setting: The project site has been completely developed as far as cultural resource recovery is concerned. The entire site has been graded, landscaped and developed. Any potential resources were addressed during the approval and development of Plot Plan 91-456 for the shopping center. Plaza Tampico has also been partially developed with commercial uses; remaining undeveloped acreage may need to be re- surveyed for potential resources upon further development applications. A through E. No Impact. There is no potential for impacts to any aspect of cultural resource issues relative to either site. Both sites have been developed with commercial uses, and the proposed equipment will be enclosed within an existing tower structure or placed on the roof where it will not be visible. 3.15 RECREATION Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta has an adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan that assesses the existing resources and facilities and the future need of the City. The City contains approximately 28.7 acres of developed parkland for Quimby Act purposes. The 845.0 acre regional Lake Cahuilla County Park is not included in this count as it is a county facility. There are also bike, equestrian, and pedestrian trails within the City that are designated in the General Plan. A, B. No Impact There is no probability that the proposed equipment placement will impact existing or planned recreational opportunities. The proposal will not affect or create any demand for recreation. SECTION 4: MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The Initial Study for the proposed PCS equipment indicates that there will be no significant adverse impacts upon the environmental issues in the checklist. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan (M1VIP) has been prepared for this project based upon this environmental assessment. Most of the measures are standard requirements for project approval and are not unique to this proposal. The following findings can be made regarding the mandatory findings of significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines and based on the results of this environmental assessment: • The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, with the implementation of mitigation measures. • The proposed project will not have the potential to achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals, with the successful implementation of mitigation. The proposed project will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. 17 • The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, with the implementation of mitigation measures. SECTION 5: EARLIER ANALYSIS A. Earlier Analyses Used. The following documents were used and/or referred to in the preparation of this assessment: • La Quinta General Plan Update; October 1992 • La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment; October 1992 • Pacific Bell Mobile Services Fact Sheets; PCS Antenna Safety • Analysis of electromagnetic fields produced by PBMS proposed PCS facility, Richard Tell Associates, Inc.; July 1996. These and various other documents on file with the Community Development Department were used in the preparation of this Initial Study. B. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Not applicable. No impacts were identified from the proposal which were not directly related to installation of the proposed antennae and equipment. Site specific mitigation has been incorporated. C. Mitigation Measures. Mitigation measures are discussed in this addendum where underlined. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan (M1V1P) has been prepared for the project that will become a part of the conditions of approval attached to the project approvals and permits. Prepared by: Wallace H. Nesbit Associate Planner Date: $IZ$�9(, ~ N N o C N N 6 CrI o� U W W A z Q^ U W OU W U z Igo 0 w� �o o � b Mz o z0 V1 N O M �W V W E-' z 1--d W U W O U W F. U z hN F" H zz a w� 0 b U Mz O za W E� U pq zQ ¢W � U W ®U a w po a a b C7 � o � a w� w � o .tea •� cu W •' ri G7 O E-+ 44 U Oo H Q U pq d Q � x U U U F• U CJ E C7 �o �z w� � a 0 Mz c�za W F" B W a U uU W F� CJ E O OO z—Z O O � [a � O W � a 0 a� W q z °0 �Q U U U W U E~ O zz w� 0 u w �zw Z F O a� U 0.0 as u W . O M z° z v D�1 i-r iSr Gar w 0 a �qq Fnl U pQ 9z �U O� u U U C� ® z Goa �d c� < x 9 � a cat rb W NO r ; z O z CO 1-d ►•a �a u ®m u u G� A o p4 E� CIS E-4 ca cn M z ® CO N N U A� A z� @ r� u ®m u u Ey U' EA Gar 0 z � w... c c rA w �za �z ca �w U A L�4 C� U' G=r O A� Yvl U u ®m u u G� C� isr Gbi � w a o �M Mz ®za A U y CL g rA rn D 3 two 45 � F � •, o o A �; A a A a, •.� �Ln 00 w � o ar � nu .•. Q � 4. o 40. o 4. F Sp 3 et .ti Cal 0 orA , o CO is as ° �°� M W ►'� O Ey v�Vi �i c� Cad '� FW z Qr U u u G� � w a 0-4 en ® z a A z� La, O A H� �z4-4 �z o C; 15 ►�i G p�q A u 0� a y .o A� Aa Aq•N a,® b A. peg A A 'b A A ® AG ACA A� •� � .80 @ � v� CU � � u s7 y 5 u % fs ® ►—� F it Gi M Cd 4 � «s � :� �' cl G 4% •v V Olt Planning Commission Resolution 96- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA., CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-322 PREPARED FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96- 025 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-322 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ofthe City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24th day of September, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 96-322 and Conditional Use Permit 96-025; and, WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 96-322); and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said Use Permit will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Use Permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly, in that no significant impacts have been identified, and less than significant or potentially significant impacts can be addressed by the incorporated mitigation measures. 2. The proposed Use Permit does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, due to the lack of any such factors existing on or near the existing facility. eares322.cup Planning Commission Resolution 96- 3. The proposed Use Permit does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, with implementation of the monitoring program 4. The proposed Use Permit will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. The area is established infill subdivision, with infrastructure to support such development already in place, and the proposal is considered an ancilliary part of the existing structure which will not effect an increase in growth through any modification of the existing conditions on the site. 5. The proposed Use Permit will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. Supporting documentation submitted by the applicant indicates that microwave emissions associated with the proposal will be substantially below nationally recognized safety threshholds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quanta, California as follows: 1. That the recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 96-322 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, attached hereto, and on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 24th day of September, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABLES, Chairman City of La Quinta, California eares322.cup Planning Commission Resolution 96- ATTEST: JERRY BERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California eares322.cup EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-025 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES - PLAZA TAMPICO SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 1. Development of this site shall be in substantial conformance with Exhibits approved and contained in the file for Conditional Use Permit 96-025 (Alternative Site 2), unless amended by the following conditions. 2.. The approved Conditional Use Permit shall be used within one year of City approval date of September 24, 1996; otherwise, it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Be used" means beginning of substantial construction toward installation of antennas and equipment cabinets as allowed by this approval. One year time extensions up to a total of two extensions may be requested pursuant to City requirements. 3. The exterior lighting plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The Arts in Public Places fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Prior to final building inspection, a black nonreflective coating shall be placed on the exposed surfaces of the antennas to prevent glare. The coating shall be approved by the Community Development Department. 6. Upon their approval by the City Council, the City Clerk is authorized to file these Conditions of Approval with the Riverside County Recorder for recordation against the properties to which they apply. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for installation of any antennas or equipment cabinets contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances, if necessary, from the following public agencies: * Fire Marshal * Public Works Department * Community Development Department conaprvl.412 Riverside County Environmental Health Department Desert Sands Unified School District Coachella Valley Water District * Imperial Irrigation District California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from these jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. S. No signs are permitted as part of this approval. 9. The applicant shall pay all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for the plan checks and permits. 10. Within three days after Planning Commission approval, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department a check payable to the County of Riverside for $1,328.00 This fee shall be forwarded to the Riverside County Clerk's Office for payment of the State -required Fish and Game Fees and administrative handling fee. conaprvl.412 ATTACHMENT 1 waNm MAP N.T.S. ( CASE MAP CASE Nm CUP 96-025 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES SCALE: ATTACHMENT 3 N < N V d C U E (A W ~O CL E N O Z O P C) O M O d N N •- O LU W = w W Z xv`�a o Low 00000 ® X a z�'00000 F®i D O w y v 0 O N O O O F.y LO Lj N M () a W ?� Z 0 00 O 0 O 0 O 0 O P `- 0E O O O O O tff Z 0 Z F IL z Lua ..� 4 w z z W M Q W rnt.ovP W P to N M t o O) a U X UR U O C3 e- Cl O O G F-- W Z W LL lu IUL d. f"q N P � ►mod co (p 10 M iy Z IL a m u V* N P ah C a0 W P to M P c0 P P a Z %- ¢o Q Lis ® Z Z: Z z J Q N Z LU "4: Lys 9 7 Z © lz Q OW0 = a)O ch tt tD ch tD d tV �1 lu 3 L7 co O � Q -000 -L� zjNhm Wd N In Uo a 0 0 N a wtujM W >- Lu in Z Q�pQ�C Z� „O®OOo Z W m d o 0 0 0 0 ac �� CI IV)a0"�v" aMv tun)i W z y. u. Min Ir+ , U.S. & Canada. dial 1-800-325-W 180 180 Model 58000 / 58010 92°, 15 dBd PCS Panel (a member of the DAPA QuintStarTM family of PCS panels) a 270 H-plane E-plane 0 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Frequency -Range 1710 - 1990 MHz Impedance 5092 VSWR Polarization Rated Power < 1.4:1 Vertical 500 W ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS Beamwidth: H-plane 920 ± 30 (at -3 dB) E-plane 70 ± 1 ° (at -3 dB) Maximum / Minimum Gain 15 dBd / 14 dBd Electrical Downtilt 0° (available - I' to -I5°) Side Lobes < -I5 dB Front -to -Back Ratio < -25 dB MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS Height x Width x Depth 53.3" x 6.3" x 2.7" (1353 x 159 x 68 mm) Weight 11 lbs (5 kg) Wind Survival Rating 125 mph (200 km/h) 0 ' Wind Load (at 100 mph) 363 N (frontal Ft) 160 N (lateral F2) Flat Plate Equivalent Area 2.31 ft'- (0.22 m2 ) Connector Types (Female) Type N, or 7/16 DIN Materials: Antenna / Radome Aluminum /ABS 26 DAPA Communications, Inc. • Olean, NY 14760 USA • Tel 716 373 7228 • Fax 716 373 5758 < Q O o p p N I N 13 10 In Iv .i M NLltlt IH�illf/If�H�jf Ilj�jl/�+jjH�l r 11 NNHN�IIIIiIXF111tiI1t11HNH11ii1 Only\_ �\_ t\ p ,• .• �,•.• ?a.��•~' g 0 NO 88 o Limb iz fill/ ®irn�FlHIIII /H1IIIIN�IIIIi1HI N9 o Q�� 0000; tfI C� r r• a�'.'•'••,',.'i.`'m•,.• �_�.•• Q' ud Me:DM IN LL- ON � � N 1 0 7 V D a O O O O N N 11 a o "Oo Mo .oaamVo Na•uo m aM 0 • Lna.imo a N R 0 0 F 0.4 d 0140 ��a a 0! 0! 1!01 rh1r1nU!A1U !Oa0!91 . rv1nr! minMa90!!0! +NNOr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nU1M.iOfnanM.i01hUIM.i/Intt1M.-IO1nY1M.4C1nlryMriOlrvlMbr101rlA M.�O1h1(1 .iNMMaUibrnO01O.-/mI N M wm Y14On ODmm O.-INMM wmnrmm 0NM .1.i.iri .i .i .i .i .-1 .i .i .i .iNNNNNNNNNNNN MMMMM m. UOM. U1UI b OVN. 01b NO. M. N00 UNP. O.1 a,": M MMN.i O Of ObOMO.i fn UI bPO ar alb mob to.i as b Ut lV O.i N al lOr m a .4 .4 t4 •+`+�� •+� I I I I I I .4.1NN.iN4 .i.i 1 1 I I I I I I I .. ...... ...... ...... .... .. ...... ...... .. .... .. .. .. ...... .. .... .. .. .. .. .... .... .. .. .. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O bal N OOb al N OmbQNOmb al N O mb al N O O b�? N O m b al w o m b V'N Omb .i N M M V 6f1 to r n m .f O .i .i N M v M ttl b n m gh O+ O .i N M M w in r n m O% o N m M .i.i.i .i.i.i.i.i.i.i 11.4.4 N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M MM O UI.l al b b m m O.i N N O O M M.i m O r N m N N N m O M m v N m O b M O m OIo 01 cc No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M MMN.i O Ora; I*M.i .iNQ U1 b P OI MM m 01 O b r.i 01 b U1 M O.iN VbP moo.iN 1"1 'r'I •i 1^i •i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .i N N .i N N .i .i I I 1 I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ufM.�o+nufM.-Io+rutM.�c+rinM.�mrutM.+arinM.+mrufM.-iaPufM.+arinM .iNNMal Ulbbrm01OO.iN M.l al t11b P 0 m m o.4 N N M V Ulbbr wm Oo.i NM O bNM 00ha0Mm mw m.i .i o N.i b vm.im0 m v v O P N.i m•l .i m m P m m nU1 MMMN.-i O 01m P11 C e C; N V'Ut 1O n Cf M.im a; On 1A m.1019 Uf v; ON aft 000; C; CI �� •+ � •+ � I I 1 1 1 1 1 ., NNN .� N .+ .+ I I 1 1 1 .+ .+ .+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 al N 0 0 b.! N O 0; b •? NC; W b "�1' N 0 0 b al N 00 b al N O m b@ N C;m b V N C;m b Q N .1NNMaW bb1"m01O 0.fr4(n-Pal U1bP O OCI 0.1N NMal Ul b b r ccat O 0" NM .1 .i .i .i .i .i .i .i .a .i .i .i .i N N N N N N N N (4 N N N M M M M M 0 b N b Ot 11 0 b N U1 Ot 0 N M 0 0 N al b .i Ot U1 N m b b b at N m m v b N 01 to N b n P b al M M M N.i O Ot m P U1 M.i O N 1.1 V'b rmM 0; O a; a; a O N 01 P Ut M.1 O N M Ut r O 0; O.iN '� •'i •i *i 1 I I I I I 1 .I N N N .i N N .i 1 Jill .................................................................................... 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0; ...U1 MiO.P.U.M..01rU1 C ...1.M..0.rU.M .CI .U1C .0.P.U1 . .1.i N M a► U1 U1 b P m m tt 0.1 N 01 on U1 b r P 0.I C) d N M 10 Ut in r m at m O.1 NM .i ri.i.i.i.i .i .i.i.i.i.i N N N NNNNNNNNN NMM M fn 0. rM r O 0. 0. m M 0. M. .i b r. M. UM. N. UIN 70. M. r. .tM 4.0i nM. Ot P7O bb UIM. M M M N N .i 0 0 r W al N O N M v b P 0 N 0 0 m m v d M o n b al .i O .i M U1 P m M O "N .i .i .i .i 1 I I 1 I I I .i .i N ri ri N N .i .i 1 1 1 1 .i .-1 .i I I I I I 1 1 1 1 .. .. .. .. ...... .... .. ...... .. .. .. .. .... ...... ...... .. .. .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N OOb nNOOb aI NOmb V N O m b•7' N O O b N O O b al N o O b al N o O N O .i .i N M al Ui U1 b r m 0/ 01 0 .i N M M al U1 id n n M 0 01 O .i .i N M al M 90 b r m 01 at 0 .i N M .1 .i .i .i .i .i .i .i .i .i .i .i N N N N N N N N N N N N N M en M to m n. •. O. .i.i.i 01A. O 0 1 M. O. 111 b 0. V. O. VOm 01 U1 o N M. 10 O.i M. OI.i b. 'Q N m. i! M aN M M M N N.i O O r b al N O.i M V bPm.i rm 0101 V NV O m b al.i 0.4 M U1 b m m O.IN . f •+ •i 1•i •+ 1 1 1 I I I .i .i N .i .i N N .i .i I I 1 I .i .i .i I I I I I I I I 1 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 .IN M°?17'1nbPOOOtO.iNNMV UlbbnmOf OO.iNMal •?Ulb rmm OfO.iNN Ql .i.i.i.iri.i .i .i .•I ei .i .iNNNNNNNNNNNNNMMMM a oral OtNMNrir Nut UlNnNbbri 010fmMOUl .ibmOMNb N.i 111NOb.iMVM.-1 a MM M N N.i O Cl n bal N C; V;'m L1 PO 11b C;Ct C4 1C b4 ONM11 O01 O.iN .i .i .i A. i 1 1 1 1 1 1 .i .i N N .+ N N .i .i 11 1 1 1 .i .i .i a 0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 N Omb1a'NOOb.1 NOOb VNOOb V NOO balNOOblNOOb V NODD balNOO •.i .iN Mal• ar N b P O O 01 O.i N N M V Utbb POm OO./N m v w NbPOO m O.i NN NO .i.iei.•I .l .i .i .i .•1 .i .i .iNNNNNNNNNNNN NMM MM :0 I i let�� N M M a O r B� Innn OMMG o H oc O .k M H N H N H OCI 0' H D tl tT .� t� w O O O O N N th V O oiioN0C ulid o a+ z a a :3 Hp u u d x 00 0 041 1. w — 0 O MO O UI 0 O H 0co.00 N a U O W b M 0 U1pH4 Ac; R O OA SO:oQ5 tit; 4a00i R 1w 0 .114 a Mr W NbUIO UIN W OMO HOUIbbh W Nb OOOU1HnatM UI UIhNOHHUI UIN of 0 MMM NHOnmN UI OVb at I-nM UlH ObaMNVNOW hnVaW co* r Om n0.W rd HHH IV NNIV NN.iNNNMNHHHHHH 11 1 H 1 .1 1 HdHHNt+INNNHHN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M H at N V M M M H H WN b W O N abW O Nb O NV Oa N OV UUrb Ua VNNHa 00W hbbm VMNNH 1 HN Nen V Ubbn W m00W b NV MN H H H H d H H H 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H d H H H I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nb W NOfHOOUtUf IflHOHNUtMOH VUfOUIM W 0 taNHbUibO0 t1! 4! Mt U MMM W t-M0bMVOMW M W nM00NOnhHN0 V M W bNOnMM W d0 W r0 H 1 H N 1 H H N d N M N N N H H N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NO W MUth of H M Ut r atd Muth atd M Ulr Of dM1AMH Oth UI M H ath Ul M H atn UtMH VMM hbU1a V MNH0001 Whbb ttt V MNNH 1 dd C4M V in Ui b h W Ct at OH NM I I I I I I I I I I Nb W NOhn NNM HMM HNNnNO bob NOW dM V HM W W mmm"NOtt1UIo Ut MMM bOW W NWh atV atdW W IV' N0 UI 00 WHOOMN at O UtHC r 0001n0 H d H H N H H N H H H N N M N H H N H H N H d I H d I H H d H H N H N M N N N H H N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Ot h V b a;O Nab W O N V b W O N V b W O N V b NC; a; b V N O W b V N O W b V NC; V V M rbUl In 'V'MNdHOat W hrbUf aMMNH 1 HHNM V IA tAbnW Ot Of OHNM M in Hd I1.�.-I.aH„aHH I I I I I I I 1 I I I HdHH H UI ioc MbNH W N H at H O NH H U100 UI O h N N W Mb O n b Ul at in Ot O b d UI UI n U10 MMM MdN at N b 0th In* W Mat VbOO Uf V NHhNVbdN M O 01h HUt M 00 W 90 H H H I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 000 00000400O000000000000000000oo00000000000 O1 f u1rO1 .1 P1 in in .iM in a1.iMU1 t�01.IM U1n r•l o+n UIM Ha1F UIM.1 al ntfl M.101 V VIA hbNN VMNHHOatWa;4( l VMMNH I HNMV VUIbhW W OfOdNN M M M H H H d H d H H d H I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 H d H H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H UIh coOH UI W at co MO UI00 itch iW hMVb at OMNOV b UI n In 0a HHN MMM HbdOfNhHbVb OfbOVUIO HHVb O M Mb N W UI 000;W O of 0;Hd 0;hW I I t I I I I l I I I I l I i l l l l 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of r M b W O N V b W O N V b W O 4 b MNbH bN O WbV N O WbV N O WM VIt I dNMV VUIbh W W OfOHNN MMM O Vh bUIH O UI n pt W M 1+1 H H b M Ut d N a W rl1 U VN p)b W Mr HOHbN O UI UI UI M M It 001H.i 0t to ",a q tld 0%.4 M Od N O N M O M V aObIAdo* OW 0%0 M UI N O Ot nr H H d .4c4tn N N .I N H N N M M N H N H N H d I I H I I I H I H H d N M M N N. H H I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W fOV n01 .1M Ufr O�.l M L1 e` a1H M Ll n 0;H r; aldhUtMHof nUIM.1 o+n UIM HO1r M VUI h b b UI V M N Nd o Ot W W nb Ut V V01NH I I HNMM VUib nnW atollHN MMM .-i.�.-aHHHHHdH I I I I I I I I 1 I I HHHH a 1 1 1 1 1 1 i l l Ot Vh W HObHON W bOUtdMNUtN Wn V OH V mn W Uih UIHUfHHHb WUIUI HUt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NMM Ot at ndMHW Utdbm vbbNb atNMOV V WO inVnHh 01 Ot Ot in Nat Othb d H H d 1 d 1 d H d d M M N d d H d I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n UI M W O N al' b W O N a b W O N a b W O N V b W O N b a N O W b V N O W b V N O W b cn VUI hnbM VMMNHOat Ot W hbUt ltt VMNHd 1 dNMM VMfon�W afOHHN M M M H d H H H d H H d H I I I I I I I I I I I I H d H H I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 W Mh ... W OOOHHH W MOUIbHbHMU1M UINnU1bW W VMM V W ONHbUIO U1 Ot W NMM G' OtbHO of UI UI UIVn O; Ut Ut UI r M M O M M OM V VOb Utr NU10 W HW MOOrb H H Hts rt I N N N M N N .•I N N N M N d H d H d d 1 1 1 H 1 I H I d H N d M M N N N d H I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 ooi� eo000oo.....000000000000000000000000000. f0 VC4 •.UI a1.IM UI t` at .� M Ut n Of .-10f Ut t- Of.I M Ul n a%.� M U1 M"Ch t- W M ri O1 r U1 M.i Of rUt M VUi hnbYf VMMNHO01 atW rbUt UIVMNHd 1 HNNM VUtb'a natOOdN MMM M HddHHdHHdHlllilillllll HdHH I I I I I I I I I I M M M N H H � !( V .1 .i 0 u PQ e iv Aso WO O In O O " of m 4 1 0 N t • O O w en In0"m Qhu. a 0 0 r-i 4 ii a�agg�i...4N :s ■ XSO+ Q 0 o .•t H of M woMutro N NM N.i.i 0 0 0 0 0 0 O w 10 V•NO V.1nw rm " 114 14 .a .r .1 oo.-loulw w vlMr 00 N N in NN.1 O O O O O O at t-tn en at MvtnwPn "to NM w.i to cm cn .i(n N N N N N .1 I I I I I I O O O O O O w w•V Now Mvinwt-r .1 �4 " .1 .1 .I N W N O to w N Nto ic)" N NNN44 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 0 O O O O tr to M " at f- en w in -6 to r. .a H .4 " .i .1 .+vaototow N NNN.1 .1 I I I I I I O 0 0 0 0 0 w V'NO ww M•Yltn w wee ri al rl .•1 .i .1 N ..79 N r�I N lnwm coat N NN44".4 0 0 0 0 0 0 to M .•/ at t` M M v In M wr .•1 .1 .� rl .1 rl M O 1n .1 .i to O w M"atP N NNM.4.i I I I 1 1 1 O O O O O O a NO to wv Maalninwr O ON 14 OD .I t�N.IC f N NNMN.i O O O O O O M.1 at t`wM M 7a In w Ir .1 .4 11 i �i RICHARD TELL ASSOC ATES, INC. ATTACHMENT July 29, 1996 The City of La Quinta c/o PLANCom, Inc. 2955 Red Hill Avenue Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92727 C1TY,,r_ oEPA.�" Deference: Analysis of electromagnetic fields produced by a Pacific Bell Mobile Services proposed Personal Communications Service radio communications facility (La Quinta Tower, Site C:M-478-12)(APN# 769-030-049). To whom it may concern: Summary: This letter report conveys my findings in regard to an evaluation of the electromagnetic fields that could be produced by a Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) base station proposed to be installed on a tower located at 50929 Washington Street in La Quinta, California. The communications facility proposed is a part of the PBMS network to provide Personal Communications Service (PCS) in the region. The evaluation has been prepared to address the issue of human exposure to the electromagnetic fields (signals) that would be transmitted from the antennas that would be situated atop the La Quinta tower. As detailed in this letter report, the analysis shows that exposure levels that could possibly be experienced in the vicinity of the proposed installation are extremely low when compared to applicable standards for human safety. The maximum power density that would be expected in the vicinity of the proposed project, including locations at the base of the tower, will not exceed 0.936 microwatts per square centimeter. This low value may be compared to a power density limit of 1,305 microwatts per square centimeter recommended by the American National Standards Institute and 1,000 microwatts per square centimeter recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements for continuous human exposure to electromagnetic fields. Based on this analysis, it is concluded that the electromagnetic fields that would be produced as a consequence of operation of the proposed PBMS communications equipment will comply with all applicable health protection standards. Maximum exposure levels that could result inside the La Quinta tower will be typically less than 0.2 microwatts per square centimeter. The maximum value of 0.936 microwatts per square centimeter is more than 53,400 times less than the threshold for hazardous effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields at the frequencies used by the PBMS system. The extremely wide margin between the projected field power densities, under worst case conditions, and applicable standards leads to the conclusion that arguments against the project based on concerns over impact on public health are not scientifically defensible. (702) 645-3338 ® FAX (702) 645-8842 . 8309 Garnet Canyon Lane • Las Vegas, NV 891T PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 2 Background: Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) has proposed to install several antennas which would operate in the 1,958 MHz frequency range on the roof of the La Quinta Tower at 50929 Washington Street in La Quinta, California, to add Personal Communications Service (PCS) coverage in the area. The present analysis was performed to evaluate the magnitude of electromagnetic fields that would be produced by the proposed new antennas. Electromagnetic fields were computed based on theoretical considerations of the antennas and were expressed in terms of power density in the unit microwatts per square centimeter (µW/cm2) and compared to the most recent exposure standard established for electromagnetic fields and human exposure recommended by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI, 1992). Resulting power densities were also compared to the exposure criteria recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP, 1986). Description of Transmitting Facilities: The proposed transmitting antennas would be placed atop the La Quinta Tower at a height of 43 feet to the center of radiation of the antennas above the ground. Three sets of transmitting antennas would be placed at the top of the tower in such a configuration as to -provide for a so-called sector type coverage of the transmitted signals; each set of antennas would favor a particular direction. In operation, a maximmn of two transmitters would be used for each of the three sectors and each transmitter hasthe capacity of producing a maximum of 25 watts of radiofrequency (RF) power. When used with the directional antennas, a maximum of approximately 200 watts of effective radiated power (relative to a dipole antenna) will be produced in each of the three general directions of 0, 120 and 240 degrees. This effective radiated power (ERP) represents a practical constraint on the system imposed by communications engineering issues; higher ERP could lead to interference with communications with other base stations. For purposes of this analysis, however, an assumption was made that the absolute maximum ERP that could ever be achieved with the given equipment could exist even when, in practice, a lesser value may be used. In this fashion, power densities that are greater than those that would actually be encountered will be found and, hence, the analysis results will be highly conservative in that they will over project the RF field magnitudes. Each antenna has a characteristic radiation pattern which helps concentrate the transmitted signal outward toward the horizon, tending to reduce the strength of the signals at steeply downward directed points beneath the antenna. The antenna proposed for use is the DAPA Communications Model 58210. This antenna exhibits a maximum gain of 14.9 dB relative to a halfwave dipole and possesses an electrical beam tilt of 2 degrees below the horizontal. The azimuth and elevation plane radiation patterns are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Analysis Approach: Electromagnetic field power densities were computed based on the antenna radiation patterns, transmitter power, losses of the transmission line connecting the transmitters to the antennas, their height above ground and distance from the antenna PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 3 installation. In addition, an assumption was made that the RF fields will be reflected from the ground and lead to an enhanced power density at locations near the ground. Power density was computed using the formula: S _ Prx2xGa xl.64xLx2.56xl.0283 x 100 4rc • R 2 Where S = ground level incident power density, (µW/cm2); PT = maximum possible transmitter output power, (W); Ga = antenna power gain in downward direction, based on the actual elevation angle below the horizontal to the antenna and the adjacent points of interest; L = transmission line loss between transmitter and antenna (3.2 dB or a factor of 0.478); R = distance between the transmitting antenna and point of interest, (m); The factor of 1.64 in the formula relates to the gain of a half -wave dipole, the reference for antenna gain for the types of antenna used for the PCS; the factor of 2.56 in the numerator accounts for ground reflections that may exist and which can theoretically increase the apparent power density by a factor of 2.56 when the electric fields radiated directly from the antenna and those reflected from the ground add in phase with one another. This factor is based on field measurement data collected by the Environmental Protection Agency and is recommended for use in power density calculations by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC, 1985). For the calculations of power density resulting from the proposed PBMS antenna, the maximum number of simultaneously operating RF channels was assumed to be two (this corresponds to the factor of 2 in the numerator and accounts for a possible two transmitters connected to each antenna). Power density calculations were made for a height of six feet above the ground to correspond to the nominal height of a standing individual. The factor of 100 converts the power density to units of microwatts per square centimeter. The factor of 1.0283 in the numerator accounts for the small increase in total power density that occurs because of the simultaneous operation of three antennas. See the following Analysis Results section for more detail on this issue. Analysis Results: The RF fields that will be produced by the proposed installation will be strongest along the pointing directions of the three different sectors, i.e., along 0, 120 and 240 degrees. Because of the directionality of the antennas in the azimuth plane, the power density along any radial direction will be principally caused by the antenna most closely aligned with that direction. Nonetheless, the power density even along a given antenna pointing direction will be slightly influenced by the RF fields radiated by the other two antennas. This effect was analyzed by examining the relative ERP that would result in various azimuthal directions, compared to that ERP that would exist with only one antenna operating. The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 3. In this figure, it is seen that the relative ERP can be as great as 102.83% of the single antenna value, PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 4 meaning that the simultaneous operation of the two antennas not pointing in the same direction add about 2.83% to the power density. In other directions, the resulting composite power density can be as low as 58.43% of the value along any one of the given sector directions due to its antenna. This minimum power density value occurs at the midpoint between the main beam directions of the various antennas, i.e., at 60 degrees either side of the main beam. The slight enhancement of power density was, however, applied in the analysis to account for the possibility that all three antennas may be operating at the same time. Figure 4 illustrates the projected power densities that would result at various distances from the antenna installation. The power density varies in an oscillatory manner because of the various sidelobes of the antenna radiation pattern in the elevation plane; at different distances from the tower, the angle between the observation point and the antenna changes resulting in the antenna exhibiting a different gain and, thereby, producing a different power density near the ground. The maximum power density from the analysis is 0.936 µW/cm2 and this value occurs at 423 feet from the tower. Beyond this distance, the power density decreases. At the closest property boundary to the tower, 43 feet distant, the estimated power density is 0.254 µW/cm2. Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure Standards: Computed values of electromagnetic fields produced by the subject communications antennas were compared to various recommended limits for public exposure to RF fields. In particular, the recommendations contained in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in conjunction with the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the exposure criteria recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) were examined since the FCC has proposed adoption of new RF rules based on these guidelines. These ANSI/IEEE guidelines specify maximum permissible exposures for both controlled environments and uncontrolled environments, the limits for uncontrolled environments being five times more stringent in the frequency range applicable to the antennas being studied. The table below presents several electromagnetic field exposure standards or recommendations for the PCS frequency to be employed by the proposed project and the corresponding power density limits. Summary of Several Standards or Recommendations on Maximum Human Exposure Levels to Electromagnetic Fields Applicable at 1,958 MHz Standard Power density limit (µW/cm ) Hazard threshold 50,000 ANSI (1992) 1,305 NCRP (1986) 1,000 IRPA (1988) 979 PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 5 Canada (1991) 1,000 United Kingdom (NRPB, 1993) 10,000 Australia (1990) 200 Russia (1984) 10 Worst case power density for proposed facility 0.936 The above table illustrates that the ANSI/IEEE, NCRP and other standards contain a significant margin of safety, being about 50 or more times less than the actual hazard threshold. This observation is particularly relevant since it means that exposure even at the power density limit specified by the standard does not imply that a hazard exists. Most of the standards recommend a maximum power density in the range of about 1,000 µW/cm2 with the United Kingdom recommending a power density approximately ten times greater and Australia and Russia having lower limits. Most striking is the very low value used in Russia of only 10 µW/cm2. While this value represents a very much more stringent limit than others used commonly in the West, this standard has come under criticism as not be based on sound science and as not being necessarily enforced in Russia. Regardless of the standard applied, however, the electromagnetic fields that would be produced by the installation of the PBMS facility are substantially less than any of the recommended limits, even the extremely stringent Russian guidelines. Further insight to the potential for excessive electromagnetic field exposure from the proposed facility may be gained by determining how close to the antenna one would have to be for the power density to reach the NCRP limit. Assuming that both transmitters are active, each operating at 25 watts, the distance in the main beam would be 1.85 feet, less than arm's length, from the antennas at which the general population exposure limit would be reached. This distance would apply only, however, to a point directly horizontal to the antenna in its main beam of radiation. Such a possibility is not reasonable for the proposed site since there are no other tall structures immediately adjacent to the antenna mounting locations. Conclusions: A theoretical analysis of the proposed PBMS transmitter installation at the La Quinta Tower shows that the resulting strength of the transmitted signals will be negligibly small in terms of concerns over possible hazards that might come about from human exposure to the signals. Maximum exposure levels that could result in the vicinity of the site will be more than 53,400 times less than the threshold for hazardous effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields at the frequencies used by the PCS system and are less than any of the standards or recommendations of the American National Standards Institute, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the International Radiation Protection Association, and the standards of numerous other countries, including the extremely stringent standard of the former Soviet Union. The extremely wide margin between the projected electromagnetic field power densities, PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 6 under worst case conditions, and applicable standards leads to the conclusion that arguments against the project based on concerns over impact on public health are not scientifically defensible. I trust that this letter report adequately addresses the technical issues associated with the transmissions from the proposed PBMS PCS facility in La Quinta. I have enclosed a copy of my personal resume to provide the City with information on my background and qualifications that are relevant to preparing this evaluation. If I can be of further assistance in answering questions that the City may have, please contact me. Respectfully yours, Richard A. Tell President Enclosure: Resume of Richard A. Tell PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 7 References ANSI (1992). American National Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992. American National Standards Institute, 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017. Australia (1990). Australian Standard AS 2772.1-1990. Radiofrequency radiation Part 1: Maximum exposure levels-100 kHz to 300 GHz. Standards Australia, 80 Arthur Street, North Sydney 2060, Australia. Canada (1991). Limits of Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields at Frequencies from 10 kHz -300 GHz. Safety Code 6. Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, National Health and Welfare, Canada, catalog no. H46-2/90-160E. FCC (1985). Evaluating Compliance with FCC -Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation. OST Bulletin No. 65. Federal Communications Commission, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DC 20554. IRPA (1988). Guidelines on limits of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 300 GHz. Health Physics, Vol. 54, No. 1 (January), pp. 115-123. NCRP (1986). Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. ReportNo. 86. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. NRPB (1993). NRPB Revised Guidance on Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. An Introduction to proposed new guidelines. Conference Volume, Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London SW1, UK, Wednesday 31 March. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot Oxon O%11 ORQ U.K. Russia (1984). New Soviet population standard: 10 4W/cm2 at MW frequencies. Microwave News, Vol. V, No. 5, pp. 1-5. PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 8 Azimuthal Gain Pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 Sector Type Antenna ONEEMEN .. IN ■MMEME®■ ME NORSEMEN ME ■ERl! EMEND E M . . ..... . .:. ... ... ... Figure 1. Azimuthal plane gain pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 sector antenna. 20 10 0 m v -10 .a -20 -30 Elevation Gain Pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 Sector Type PCS Antenna Maximum gain is 44.9 Ad at _1 degree's -40 U. � - I -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 Bevation angle below horizontal (degrees) Figure 2. Elevation plane gain pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 sector antenna. PBMS La Quinta Tower Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 9 Relative ERP vs. Azimuth for Site CM-478 Expressed as a Percentage of the ERP for a Single Sector 105 100 L1Max=102.8 % °e 95 0 m 90 w ro 85 80 m 75 70 08. 65 a: to 60 - in-5 .43% 55 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Azimuth (degrees) Figure 3. Relative ERP vs. azimuth for three DAPA Model 58212 sector type antennas mounted at 0, 120 and 240 degrees. Power Density vs. Distance for Site CM-478 Calculated at 6 Feet Above Ground with Ground Reflections Along Path of Any One Sector 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 m 0.4 m 0.3 0 a 0.2 0.1 0.0 =��_ ��_WAU� R1'V111#I11E= 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Lateral distance from antennas (ft) Figure 4. Power density vs. distance at 6 feet above ground adjacent to proposed antenna installation at the La Quinta Tower. Power density values include the effects of ground reflections and the simultaneous operation of three sector antennas each operating with two transmitters. RESUME SUMMARY Richard A. Tell Telephone: Work 702-645-3338 FAX 702-645-8842 Internet: rictell@accessnv.com President, Richard Tell Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in electromagnetic field exposure assessment and particularly the investigation of potential hazards. Formerly, Chief, Electromagnetics Branch, Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada, managing a program to support development of Federal regulatory limits for exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields and to assess environmental levels of electromagnetic fields. Experience Highlights (29 years of active work on electromagnetic radiation hazards-20 years in Federal Government and 9 years private consulting practice) • Radiofrequency radiation exposure standards development • Laboratory management • Environmental field studies of nonionizing radiation • Computer modeling of RF population exposure • Automated RF/microwave measurement systems • Generation of highly accurate electromagnetic fields • Research on bio-effects of weak, pulsed magnetic fields • Theoretical analysis of near -field properties of antennas • Absorption of RF energy in man • EHV overhead electric power lines • Video display terminals (VDTs) • Evaluation of electromagnetic field instrumentation • Member, IEEE SCC-28 committee on RF hazards • Chairman, SCC-28 Subcommittee 4 Risk Assessment Working Group • Elected Member National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements • Chairman of NCRP Scientific Committee 78 • Member, NCRP Scientific Committee 89 on Nonionizing Electromagnetic Fields • Member IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) • Past participant in US -USSR scientific exchange on hazards of microwaves Education B.S., Midwestern University, Wichita Falls, Texas, 1966, physics and mathematics. M.S., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1967, radiation sciences. Personal Born 25 January 1944, Roscoe, Texas; U.S. citizenship; married; three children. Publications Approximately 60 reports and publications in the public domain. RESUME OF RICHARD A. TELL EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS September 1987 to present Telephone: Work 702-645-3338 FAX 702-645-8842 Richard Tell Associates, Inc. 8309 Garnet Canyon Lane Las Vegas, NV 89129-4897 President of Richard Tell Associates, Inc., after twenty years of service with the Federal Government working in the area of electromagnetic fields as related to possible health hazards. During my private consulting practice, I have worked in a variety of projects including but not limited to: • Standards compliance studies (theoretical and field studies) related to RF fields at broadcast, radar, industrial RF heat sealer and induction, VDT, satellite earth station, high power short -wave broadcast and cellular telephone facilities; • Investigation of 60-1Iz electric and magnetic fields associated with overhead power lines and building wiring systems; • Research on specialized measurement techniques and instrumentation for assessing induced and contact currents associated with RF hot spot fields and climbing of energized AM broadcast towers; • Operator exposure measurements for VDT operators using body mounted dosimeters; • Reviews of standards related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields; • Development of safety programs for use in companies where workers may be exposed to electromagnetic fields. April 1981 to er 1987 Electromagnetics Branch Office of Radiation Programs -Las Vegas Facility U.S. Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 98517 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8517 Branch Chief, Electromagnetics Branch. Responsible for management of overall Branch program. The Branch was responsible for supporting the development of Federal regulatory limits on exposure; of the general population to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and a nationwide radiofrequency measurements program to determine exposure Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 3 • Extremely -Low -Frequency Field Measurements - Assembled system for measuring ELF magnetic and electric fields in frequency range of 1-100 Hz and deployed system on West coast for measuring typical field levels originating from such sources as the Bay Area Rapid Transit System in San Francisco. Work also included the design and development of a system for generating know electric and magnetic fields under computer control using large parallel electric field plates and 1 meter diameter Helmholtz coils. • Investigation of Pulsed Magnetic Field Bio-effects - Investigated experimental methods used in studies of the biological effects of weak, pulsed magnetic fields on the development of the chick embryo. Designed a controlled system for careful and documented replication of study first reported by Delgado in Madrid to be performed by five research laboratories, supported by the Office of Naval Research, around the world in an attempt to determine if originally reported results were valid. Traveled to Madrid to confer with researchers as to exact methods and equipment used in experiments. • Acoustics - Used phase coherency techniques for direction finding of low frequency (40 Hz) sound waves in a residential environment. • RF Population Exposure Estimates - Developed a new propagation modeling method whereby environmental measurement data were used in conjunction with an automated population data base to determine population exposure which also provided a method of assessing the uncertainty in the modeling results. • Analysis of 'Near -Field Properties of Broadcast Antennas - Conducted analytical and experimental analyses of the near -field gain reduction properties of FM broadcast antenna arrays. This included measurements of near -field electric field values near a VHF dipole and electric and magnetic fields in the close proximity of AM standard broadcast and short -wave broadcast transmitting antennas. • Automated Data Bases - Developed automated data bases of U.S. broadcast stations and health care facilities suitable for computer based modeling and evaluation. • Absorption of RF Energy in Man - Reviewed available RF dosimetric data from viewpoint of assessing thermal loads on man resulting from absorption of RF energy. Made use of existing thermal stress data to examine how tissue temperature rise might be used as a possible basis for developing RF exposure safety standards. Measured RF currents flowing in man under influence of strong medium wave field strengths. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 4 • ANSI Dosimetry Workgroup - Chairman of Workgroup III for evaluation of dosimetry in connection with revision of the American National Standards Institute C95.1-1982 RF protection guide. • US -USSR Cooperative Program on Biological Effects of Microwaves - Became a participating member of the US -USSR cooperative program of scientific information exchange to further reduce unknowns in divergence between U.S. and the former USSR RF exposure safety standards. Traveled to five Soviet research institutes in 1978 as part of official scientific delegation. • Interagency Agreements - Project Officer for interagency agreements with the National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colorado, for development of specialized monitoring antenna systems; the Institute for Telecommunications Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, for antenna calibrations and determination of antenna patterns; the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, for an analysis of the economic impact of future population exposure guidelines being prepared by 'the EPA; the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Washington, DC, for providing technical support to the FCC in the form of field investigations of RF fields at specific broadcast sites throughout the U.S.; the Battelle Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington, for the development of instrumentation for the measurement of 60 Hz magnetic fields in private residences. June 1972 to November 1976 Electromagnetic Radiation Analysis Branch Field Operations Division Office of Radiation Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Silver Spring, Maryand A physicist responsible to the Branch Chief for providing technical support in the development and implementation of an environmental nonionizing radiation (NIR) protection program. My work ranged from assisting in the initial development of the overall EPA-ORP NIR program (a major aspect of which was to develop an environmentally applicable RF and microwave exposure standard) to assuming the primary technical responsibility of designing and developing a mobile electromagnetic radiation monitoring van to be used by the Branch in obtaining environmental data on RF/microwave radiation exposure. The van development project included equipment specification, procurement, development of overall system calibration procedures and application of the hardware systems to the accurate measurement of electromagnetic radiation exposure over a very wide frequency range (e.g., 10 kHz to 18 GHz). State-of- the-art techniques in real-time data acquisition and analysis, including hardware interfacing and significant, specialized software development and the design, development and evaluation of unique monitoring antenna systems compatible with the measurement requirements represented a substantial part of the work. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 5 This position involved activity in a number of other technical areas including the following: • NIR Population Exposure Determinations - Developed exposure model for AM radio broadcasting stations to use in a study to determine the number of people exposed to various levels of RF radiation. This involved the use of a computerized data base of the U.S. population. • EMI Effects on Cardiac Pacemakers and Electroexplosive Devices - Maintained close liaison with individuals both in the clinical and engineering areas dealing with detrimental interference to critical life support devices, such as pacers and electronic thermometers, to evaluate device susceptibilities to NIR. • RF Signal Propagation - Conducted studies to determine principal components of signals from broadcast stations after propagation depolarization phenomena in order to best design required monitoring antennas. • Computerized RF Source Inventories - Dealt extensively with the use of computer automated data files on RF sources within the U.S. via interaction with the Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis Center (ECAC), a Department of Defense installation in Annapolis, Maryland. Such files allowed relatively convenient evaluations of source types, densities, powers, etc., on a nationwide basis. • RF/Microwave Hazard Analysis - Extensive experience in the analytical evaluation of potentially hazardous RF/microwave situations. This included high power military radar, civilian air -traffic -control radar, satellite communications earth stations, marine and aeronautical radar units and AM, FM and TV broadcast stations. Detailed analyses of near -field phenomena were included. I conducted numerous field measurement hazard investigations of these types of sources. • EHV Overhead Power 'Transmission Lines - Conducted analytical evaluations (via computer methods) of the electric and magnetic field strengths beneath extra - high -voltage overhead power transmission lines. Measured electric and magnetic fields beneath various 345, 500 and 765 kV lines and compared results with calculated values. Investigated shock effects produced in the vicinity of lines due to current induction and standards for occupational exposure to these fields. • Acoustics - Measured acoustic sound pressure levels in the frequency domain, using spectrum analysis techniques, and developed a data acquisition program to determine the percentage of time that S]PLs exceeded various thresholds. This work was done to determine the feasibility of using an adaptation of an RF measurement system to evaluate environmental acoustic noise levels. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 6 December 1970 to June 1972 Engineering Physics Section Twinbrook Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rockville, Maryland A research investigator (physicist) responsible to the Engineering Physics Section Chief for developing instrumentation, methodology, and a theoretical background of knowledge for microwave and radiofrequency dosimetry in several areas of related biological effects research. Designed and conducted studies aimed at determination of microwave dose and dose distribution in biological systems. Provided technical support related to the exposure of biological specimens to microwave energy and the associated dosimetry. This included studies of the mechanisms of interaction. Responsibilities included an active participation in. consulting and working with biological investigators in other sections to develop the necessary technical support required for their studies. Specific areas of investigation included: measurement of dielectric properties of biological materials in the microwave range; interaction of microwave energy with dielectric materials; calculations of microwave reflection coefficients for multilayered tissue systems and resultant heating profiles throughout the systems; development of specialized exposure techniques for certain in vitro specimens to microwave energy; measurement of microwave dose rate and heating distributions in dielectrically equivalent phantom models; study of environmental levels of RF fields from sources such as radio, television and radar installations, theoretical estimates of field strengths and associated field measurements; set-up and operation of an extremely -high -frequency millimeter wave microwave apparatus for study of genetic effects of 86-95 GHz radiation on bacterial systems; measurement of reflection coefficients of rat corneal tissue over the above frequency range and investigation of effects of exposure on corneal opacities; study of microwave effects on human gamma globulins using immunological techniques in guinea pigs; use of liquid crystal techniques for mapping of thermal distributions in lossy dielectric absorbers. Assisted in the development of a microwave anechoic chamber an exposure facility operating at 2.45 GHz including a 3 kW generator. During this period I was involved in a short term (8-69 to 2-70) research assignment to New York University Medical Center to work on microwave interactions and effects on biological materials. While at the Twinbrook Research Laboratory, I developed a strong interest in acoustics and establishing an acoustic exposure facility for biological effects studies including the necessary related acoustic measurement capability. This problem was scoped, a position paper was developed on the subject of conducting noise bio-effects studies (including a comparison of long-term low level acoustic noise exposure with similar exposure to microwave energy by investigating the literature of noise bio-effects), and a proposal was developed for required equipment and materials for a basic acoustic exposure facility. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 7 August 1967 to December 1970 Division of Biological Effects Bureau of Radiological Health U.S. Public Health Service Rockville, Maryland A staff physicist involved in research in several areas of applied radiological physics, ultimately related to human exposure to radiation. Worked in nuclear instrumentation including scintillation (liquid and solid), Ge(Li), proportional and ionization chamber detectors, thermoluminescence dosimetry, multichannel pulse height analyzers and associated electronics. Particular emphasis was placed on low energy (0-50 keV) x-ray measurements in characterizing color television CRT face plate attenuation properties. Included was service to other sections in the form of instrument repair or modification or consultation on setting up and instrumentation of experiments involving use of various types of irradiation (isotope injections, x-ray machines, high intensity Cs-137 unit). General responsibilities in health physics were a part of the job. Assisted in the construction of a very high intensity, low energy x-ray machine used for material characterization and experimental animal exposures. Field work involved estimating effective energies and depth doses from naturally occurring high level radioactive deposits using pulse height spectrometry and absorption techniques. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND B.S. degree, Midwestern University, Wichita Falls, Texas, 1966. Double major in physics and mathematics. Active in local chapter of the Texas Academy of Sciences, Collegiate Academy. Representative in student government. Served last two years as a laboratory assistant in lower level physics courses. M.S. degree, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1967. Supported by USPHS fellowship. Major in radiation science. Included summer work at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York, with project work. Attended semester long series of seminars on college and university teaching. OTHER TRAINING • Biophysics, National Institutes of Health Graduate Program, Bethesda, Maryland, 1967. • USPHS training course in Gamma Ray Spectroscopy, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1976. • USPHS training course in Laser Radiation Hazards, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 1968. • Short courses in (1) Microwave Theory and Measurements and (2) Microwave Systems and Spurious Electromagnetic Radiation; Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 1969. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 8 • Graduate course, Quantum Mechanics, The American University, Washington, DC, 1970. • Microwave Dosimetry Workshop, held at Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 1972. • Fundamentals of Minicomputers, a short course presented by the National Electronics Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 1973. • ADAPTS Minicomputer Training Course, presented by Varian Data Machines, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 1973. • Antenna Theory, a short course presented by Technology Service Corporation, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1974. • The Fast Fourier Transform and Applications, presented by FFT Systems, Inc., Washington, DC, 1976. • Numerical Antenna Modeling Workshop, including instruction on use of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Numerical Electromagnetics Code for wire antennas and the Ohio State University reflector antenna code, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1982. MILITARY SERVICE Selective service obligation completed August 1969 as commissioned officer USPHS. Attained rank of CAPTAIN, 0-6, Health Services Officer at time of separation, September, 1987. OTHER WORK ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES • Speaker at orientation courses for commissioned officers in USPHS at Rockville, Maryland and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. • Past member on Technical Subcommittee Working Group on Propagation within the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee Office of Telecommunications Policy. • Past member of IEEE Task Force on "Technical Basis for Selection of Interference Limits from Electric Power Lines and Stations." • Past participant in US -USSR cooperative program on biological effects of microwaves beginning August 1978. • Invited lecturer at NATO Advanced Study Institute "Advances in Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields," Erice (Sicily), Italy, March 28-April8, 1981. • Selected as Chairman of Working Group on Dosimetry (300 MHz - 100 GHz) for the American National Standards Institute C95.4 subcommittee (1983). • Selected as Chairman of Scientific Committee 78 of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) to develop a comprehensive report as a practical guide to the assessment of radiofrequency radiation exposure, January 1984. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 9 • Selected as Chairman of Subcommittee-2 (Terminology and Units of Measurements) of IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee-28 (SCC-28), 1992. • Elected to membership on the IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR), 1992. • Selected to Chair the Risk Assessment Working Group of SC-4 in SCC-28, 1992. SOCIETY MEMBERSHIPS • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Senior Member), including: • Group on Broadcasting • Group on Electromagnetic Compatibility • Group on Microwave Theory and Techniques • Health Physics Society • Bioelectromagnetics Society • Recipient of USPHS Fellowship for graduate study at Rutgers University; • Awarded USPHS Meritorious Service Medal in 1979; • Best Paper Award for 1979 for Journal of Microwave Power; • EPA Outstanding Performance Cash Award, 1986; OTHER PERSONAL DATA • Birth date: January 25, 1944; • Birth place: Roscoe, Texas, USA; • Marital status: Married to Valeria Ann Tell, three children; • Health: Excellent, no impairments; • Interests: Amateur radio licensee since 1959 (hold Amateur Extra Class license, K5UJU), computers. PUBLICATIONS and REPORTS by RICHARD A. TELL (in the public domain) 1. Tell, R. A. (1967). Radiological Pollution from Uranium Milling in Surface Waters of the Colorado River Basin, Masters degree thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 31 pages. August. 2. Anderson, G. E., R. A. Tell, and H. D. Youmans (1970). Spectral Transmission and Attenuation of X-Radiation by Glasses and Resins Used in Color Television Receivers, IEEE Transactions opt Broadcast and Television Receivers, Vol. BTR-16, No. 2, May, pp. 82-89. 3. Tell, R. A. (1971). Microwave Absorption Characteristics of Drosophila Melanogaster, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 155-158. 4. Tell, R. A. (1971). A 94 GHz Exposure System, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 150-152. 5. Blackman, C. F. and R. A. Tell (1971). Biological Response to Microwave Irradiation: Bacteria, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp,. 106-112. 6. Tell, R. A. (1971). Microwave Field Interactions in Tissue Systems, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 133-139. 7. Mills, W. A., R. A. Tell, D. E. Janes, and D. M. Hodge (1971). Nonionizing Radiation in the Environment, In Proceedings of the Third Annual National Conference on Radiation Control, Scottsdale, Arizona, pp. 200-211, May 2-6. 8. Tell, R. A. (1972). Microwave Energy Absorption in Tissue, EPA Technical Report, 53 pages, February [NTIS order no. P13208233]. 9. Tell, R. A. and J. B. Kinn (1972). Ocular Heating During Dental Diathermy Treatment, Journal of Oral Surgery, Vol. 30, pp. 284-287, April. 10. Tell, R. A. (1972). Reference Data for Radiofrequency Emission Hazard Analysis, EPA Technical Note ORP/SID-72-3, 28 pages, June, reprinted July 1976 [NTIS order no. PB220471 ]. 11. Tell, R. A. (1972). Broadcast Radiation: How Safe is Safe?, IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 9, No. 8, pp. 43-51, August. t -� Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 2 12. Tell, R. A. (1973). Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposure: A Preliminary Analysis of the Problem and Continuing Work Within EPA, In Proceedings of a session on Environmental Exposure to Nonionizing Radiation, Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Atlantic City, New Jersey, November 14, 1972. Proceedings issued as EPA Report EPA/ORP 73-2, 136 pages, May [NTIS order no. PB220851 ]. 13. Kinn, J. B. and R. A. Tell (1973). A Liquid -Crystal Contact Lens Device for Measurement of Corneal Temperatures, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. BME-20, No. 5, pp.387-388, September. 14. Rowe, W. D., D. E. Janes, and R. A. Tell (1973). An Assessment of Adverse Health Effects of Telecommunications Technology, In Proceedings of IEEE National Telecommunications Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 9 pages, December 12. 15. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1974). Microwave Hazard Measurements Near Various Aircraft Radars, Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 161-179, April. 16. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1974). RF Pulse Spectral Measurements in the Vicinity of Several Air Traffic Control Radars, EPA Technical Report EPA-520/1-74-005, 45 pages, May [NTIS order no. P13235733]. 17. Hankin, N. N., R. A. Tell, and D. E. Janes (1974). Assessing the Potential for Exposure to Hazardous Levels of Microwave Radiation from High Power Sources, Presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society, Houston, Texas, 22 pages, July 7-11. 18. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1974). Calculated Field Intensities Near a High Power UHF Broadcast Installation, Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 401-410, July. 19. Tell, R. A. and N. N. Hankin (1974). Evaluation of the Environmental Microwave Radiation Levels Outside of the Grumman ECM Site, Calverton, New York, August 26- 27, 1974, EPA internal report, 45 pages, September 6. 20. Tell, R. A., J. C. Nelson, and N. N. Hankin (1974). HF Spectral Activity in the Washington, D.C. Area, Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 549-558, September. 21. Athey, T. W., R. A. Tell, and D. E. Janes (1974). The Use of an Automated Population Data Base in Population Exposure Calculations, In Proceedings of Eighth Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society, Knoxville, Tennessee, pp. 29-36, October. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 3 22. Tell, R. A. (1974). An Investigation of Electrostatic Field Strengths and Associated Phenomena in the Vicinity of an EHV Overhead Power Transmission Line, A study proposal, internal EPA document, 20 pages, November 14. 23. Tell, R. A. (1974). Signal Polarizations in the VHF and UHF Broadcast Spectrum, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. BC-20, No. 4, December. 24. Tell, R. A. (1975). An Analysis of Broadcast Radiation Levels in Hawaii, EPA Technical Note ORP/EAD-75-1, [NTIS order no. P132613161, 35 pages, August. 25. Tell, R. A. and D. E. Janes (1975). Broadcast Radiation: A Second Look, in Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Waves, ed. By C. C. Johnson and M. L. Shore, Selected papers of the USNC-URSI 1975 annual meeting, Boulder, Colorado, October (2 Volumes), USDHEW Publication (FDA) 77-8011. 26. Tell, R. A. (1976). A Measurement of RF Field Intensities in the Immediate Vicinity of a FM Broadcast Station Antenna, EPA Technical Note ORP/EAD-76-2, 8 pages, January 8 [NTIS order no. PB257698/AS]. 27. Tell, R. A., N. N. Hankin, and D. E. Janes (1976). Aircraft Radar Measurements in the Near Field, In Operational Health Physics, Proceedings of the Ninth Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society, pp. 239-246, February. 28. Hankin,. N. N., R. A. Tell, T. W. Athey, and D. E. Janes (1976). High Power Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation sources: A Study of Relative Environmental Significance, In Operational Health Physics, Proceedings of the ninth Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society, pp. 231-238, February. 29. Tell, R. A., N. N. Hankin, J. C. Nelson, T. W. Athey, and D. E. Janes (1974). An Automated Measurement System for Determining Environmental Radiofrequency Field Intensities II, In Proceedings of NBS symposium on Measurements for the Safe Use of Radiation, March 1-4, 1976, NBS publication NBS SP456 (1976), editor S. P. Fivozinsky, pp. 203-213. Also presented at 1974 Meeting of USNC/URSI, October 14- 17, 1974, Boulder, Colorado. 30. Tell, R. A. (1978). Field Strength Measurements of Microwave Oven Leakage at 915 MHz, presented at Symposium on Microwave Mobile Communications, held September 29-October 1, 1976, at the Institute for Telecommunications Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, and published in IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. EMC-20, No. 2, pp. 341-346, May. 31. Janes, D. E., R. A. Tell, T. W. Athey, and N. N. Hankin (1976). Radiofrequency Radiation Levels in Urban Areas, In Special Supplement on Biology in Radio Sciences, SS-1 (Selected papers of the 1976-USNC-URSI annual meeting, Amherst, Massachusetts, October 1976), pp. 49-56. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 4 32. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1976). Broadcast Signal Bandwidth Measurements Using Real -Time Data Averaging, Presented at 24th Annual IEEE Broadcast Symposium, October 14-15, 1974, Washington, DC, and in IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. BC-22, No. 4, pp.116-123, December. 33. Tell, R. A. (1977). An Analysis of Radar Exposure in the San Francisco Area, EPA Technical Note ORP/EAD-77-3, 11 pages, March [NTIS order no. PB273188]. 34. Tell, R. A., J. C. Nelson, D. L. Lambdin, T. W. Athey, N. N. Hankin, and D. E. Janes (1977). An Examination of Electric Fields Under EHV Overhead Power Transmission Lines, EPA Technical Report EPA-502/2-76-008, 39 pages, April [NTIS order no. P13270613]. 35. Tell, R. A. and P. J. O'Brien (1977). An Investigation of Broadcast Radiation Intensities at Mt. Wilson, California, EPA Technical Report ORP-EAD-77-2, 20 pages, April [NTIS order no..PB275040]. 36. Janes, D. E., R. A. Tell, T. W. Athey, and N. N. Hankin (1977). Nonionizing Radiation Exposure in Urban Areas of the United States, In Proceedings, IVth International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, editor, G. Bresson, Vol. 2, pp. 329-332, April. 37. Athey, T. W., R. A. Tell, N. N. Hankin, D. L. Lambdin, E. D. Mantiply, and D. E. Janes (1978). Radiofrequency Radiation Levels and Population Exposure in Urban Areas of the Eastern United States, EPA Technical Note EPA 520/2-77-008, May. 38. Tell, R. A. and N. N. Hankin (1978). Measurements of Radiofrequency Field Intensities in Buildings with Close Proximity to Broadcast Stations, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-3, March. 39. Tell, R. A. (1978). An Analysis of Radiofrequency and Microwave Absorption Data with Consideration of Thermal Safety Standards, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-2, [NTIS order no. PB2846391, 45 pages, April. 40. Tell, R. A., D. L. Lambdin, and E. D. Mantiply (1978). Hospital Proximities to Nearby Broadcast Stations, in Proceedings of 1978 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, June 20-22, 1978, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 100-105, IEEE publication 78-CH-1304-5, EMC. 41. Tell, R. A. (1978). Near -field Radiation Properties of Simple Linear Antennas with Applications to Radiofrequency Hazards and Broadcasting, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-4, 39 pages, June. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 5 42. Tell, R. A. and E. D. Mantiply (1978). Population Exposure to VHF and UHF Broadcast Radiation in the United States, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-5, [NTIS order no. PB284637], 29 pages, June 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp.6-12, 1980. 43. Tell, R. A. and F. Harlen (1979). A Review of Selected Biological Effects and Dosimetric Data Useful for Development of Radiofrequency Safety Standards for Human Exposure, Journal of Microwave Power, Vol. 14, No. 4. 44. Tell, R. A., E. D. Mantiply, C. H. Durney, and H. Massoudi (1979). Electric and Magnetic Field Intensities and Associated Induced Currents in Man in Close Proximity to a 50 kW AM Standard Broadcast Station, in Program and Abstracts, United States National Committee, International Union of Radio Science, and Bioelectromagnetics Symposium, June 18-22, Seattle, Washington, p. 360. Unpublished manuscript. 45. Tell, R. A., D. L. Lambdin, R. E. Brown, and E. D. Mantiply (1979). Electric Field Strengths in the Near Vicinity of FM Radio Broadcast Antennas, presented at 1979 IEEE Broadcast Symposium, September 20-21, 1979, Washington, DC. 46. Tell, R. A. (1982). Radiofrequency Measurements Workshop Summary, EPA Report 520/2-82-010, 14 pages [NTIS order no. PB115428]. 47. Tell, R. A. (1983). Instrumentation for Measurement of Electromagnetic Fields; Equipment, Calibrations and Selected Applications. In Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Nonionizing Radiation, (editors M. Grandolfo, S. Michaelson, and A. Rindi), NATO Advanced Study Institute Series, Series A: Life Sciences, Volume 49. Plenum Publishing Company. 48. Tell, R. A. and E. Berman (1984). Summary Report on Visit to Departamento de Investigation, Centro Ramon Y Cajal, Madrid, Spain, EPA report, October. 49. Gailey, P. C. and R. A. Tell (1985). An Engineering Assessment of the Potential Impact of Federal Radiation Protection Guidance on the AM, FM, and TV Broadcast Services, EPA report EPA 520/6-85-011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada April [NTIS order no. PB85-245868]. 50. Tell, R. A. (1986). Real-time Data Averaging for Determining Human RF Exposure, in Proceedings 40th Annual Broadcast Engineering Conference, National Association of Broadcasters, Dallas, Texas, April 12-16, pp. 388-394. 51. Tell, R. A., F. P. Wagner, E. D. Mantiply and R. F. Cleveland (1987). Environmental Surveys of Radiofrequency Radiation from Broadcast Transmitters. Paper P-A28, Ninth Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 21-25, 1987, Portland, OR, p. 56. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 6 52. P. Wagner, E. Mantiply and R. A. Tell (1988). Measurement of Radiofrequency Radiation and Induced Body Currents Due to Broadcast Transmitters. Paper PW-03, Tenth Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 19-23, 1988, Stamford, CT, p.81. 53. N. Kuster and R. A. Tell (1989). A Dosimetric Assessment of the Significance of High Intensity RF Field Exposure Resulting from Reradiating Structures. Paper D-1-5, Eleventh Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 18-22, 1989, Tucson, AZ, p.24. 54. Tell, R. A. (1989). An Investigation of RF Induced Hot Spots and their Significance Relative to Determining Compliance with the ANSI Radiofrequency Protection Guide. Technical report prepared for the National Association of Broadcasters, 1771 N Street, N.W., Washington, DC; 20036, July 3, 145 pages. 55. Tell, R. A. (1989). Electric and Magnetic Fields and Contact Currents Near AM Standard Broadcast Radio Stations. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, August 23, 88 pages [NTIS order no. PB89-234850]. 56. Tell, R. A. (1990). RF hot spot fields: the problem of determining compliance with the ANSI radiofrequency protection guide. In 44th Annual Broadcast Engineering Conference Proceedings, National Association of Broadcasters Engineering Conference, March 30-April 3, 1990, Atlanta, GA, pp. 419-431. 57. R. F. Cleveland, E. D. Mantiply and R. A. Tell (1990). A Model for Predicting Induced Body Current in Workers Climbing AM Broadcast Towers. Paper P-7, Twelfth Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 10-14, 1990, San Antonio, TX, p. 77. 58. Tell, R. A. (1990). An Investigation of Electric and Magnetic Fields and Operator Exposure Produced by VDTs: NIOSH VDT Epidemiology Study. Technical report prepared for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Industrywide Studies Branch, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH 45226 [NTIS order no. PB- 91-1305001. 59. R. Kavet and R. A. Tell (1991). VDTs: Field levels, epidemiology, and laboratory studies. Health Physics, Vol. 61, No. 1, July,, pp. 47-57. 60. Tell, R. A. (1991). Induced Body Currents and Hot AM Tower Climbing: Assessing Human Exposure in Relation to the ANSI Radiofrequency Protection Guide. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communcations Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, FCC/OET RTA 91-01 [NTIS order no. PB92-125186]. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 7 61. Tell, R. A. (1993). RF Current Reduction Provided by Work Gloves at AM Radio Broadcast Frequencies. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communcations Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, FCC/OET RTA 93-01 [NTIS order no. PB94-117041]. 62. Tell, R. A. (1995). Engineering Services for Measurement and Analysis of Radiofrequency (RF) Fields. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communcations Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, FCC/OET RTA 95-01 [NTIS order no. P1395-253829]. NTIS is the National Technical Information Service 1-800-553-6847 4 -: ATTACHMENT `.� s% Ky4✓:C Wa ., i pYMin. Simply stated, PCS (Personal Communications Ser►ices) is a family of customized ►►'fireless co►n►►►unicadoas senices,md de►ices that allow ►ou to communicate amtime and airtualh' anij►here. I10 it alreagt , in the midst of the PCS revolution. Car phones, portable phones. and pagers are Geeing you to car►;{' on office and personal business nhere and ►►hen You choose. Ind a new generation of PC,S Wit continue the iviolution; small phones the ske of e,ieglass Cases nei,.° ing 00. a fell, Ounces, i►fireless computers the size of a notepad and de►ices that combine both. our part of the ITS future that is just around the coiner. Ph►sicai connections between computers and phones or computers and computers are heing supplemented b► Wreless links. Ind a i ariet ► of enhanced fl allurs can alloii sou to cicstomize ►our communications ser►ice to fit ►our mobile lifestlie. IT'S is changing ; the ►►a► ii a 1h a and mvraae ourli►l�s, and these lhan�;l�s 1,1W just twainnina. A Family of Services PCS: e For Families On The Move Hoa lame an impact ��ill PCS have un family and husinrss life in the comi klecor.mmca6ons dears'' Let's look at the llillers. a t�T�ical Tamil} in the scar 19J8. for an ansn� Frontier .M ierhaiYftme I)CS cilwr_-rd \\ilh the inlrodurlion ul I'm, phonrs. portahlr phones. parrs and lay products. But this aas onh Ihr hr_-inniII_o of a \Orrlrss rmolulion. Technolo'n r\isls luda\ to prmide nr\� I'CS srilices snc•h as Irlepoinl. Mreles,; ITV and mohile d,11a as \wII ,is produces Much comhinr wicc Mid dilld wr\ic(1' 'Uch GIs a lwrsoiml IIIL'Ikil Ililh the complrlion nl Ihr 10"', -pr1 II nlll ;illor,ition ,nld licrnsi1w, pro( r.. IIIr1w\\ PCS�eiAicrs.lhl e\plosiw;.onmIII ol \\irrlrss ronununicalions will conlinur. Susan Miller: Sales representative for computer company Donald hiller: Independent engineering consultant. Robbie Miller: Age 16, high school junior, track team star. Although Susan's business takes her out of town an average of once a mon she never feels disconnected from her office or family. Wherever she goes, s carries a portable phone that gives her family. clients and coworke immediate access to her, just as if she were in town. But she also is in complc control, able to select which calls to accept. Susan especially enjoNs t convenience of never having to search for a pay phone and knffiving she never out of touch. Donald's business takes him from site to site across the entire metropolit area. With his powerful note pad -sized computer and pocket phone, he c receive stock quotesmake airline reservations, pay hills a keep in touch «ith his famik. Donald can also dial directly it his computer network from Nirtuall\ any location, send fa\c and transfer information to and from his office computer. If Donald chooses, he can leave his communications dexic at home and simplN cam a 'smart card." The sire of a cm card, a smart card enables him to access his communicatio services using other people's equipment. Robbie's ITS is limited to callinu certain numbers includi home and his parents' urk places. So if he's runnin;: late track practice or has car problems. he can easily reach i parents. Convenience? Yes. Security" Donald and Susan sle much more soundly knwin-o that Robbie is part of the personal communications neMork. Maly Services - At Your Fingertips When you speak about personal communications services, you are really talking about being in control. Imagine the ability to perform iirtually any task at the time and place of your choosing. It may be as routine as checking your credit card balance or as complex as sending a fax or Nideo mail message to your entire sales force from the field and even holding a iideo teleconference from your hotel room. With PCS, tour world is at yllur fingertips. Reach People - Not Places Sonic ITS seR ices feature a "personal number." a phone number that is associated kith i person, not a physical place. Wien someone dials \our personal number. the call is directed to Micrewr %ou are, either h\ rin yin: the ITS handset you ,Ire earning or bv sendin-1 the call to a phone near gnu. A Worldwide Revolution \round the world. in places ;uch as lapar, the l filled hin°dolll. (,erlll;lll\. 1u�Ualia. Ifnn�Mn;.an;l �in;:apore. the 'ull potential 0 I'(:S is be! inniu;,, to he 'ealivd;ls n(m I'(:S:el�ices are aircad� .Iwil;lhle lu the pilhlic. foddN in the I rlited sl;ltes. I11c re'oulalorN path is Imilli.,, cleared for the e\plosi\e ;.,,rov�th ill hnSiness alld re`ldenlial Ilse of 11(0110.: 11er51111a1 CUnlmtlllWdtiO:lS Set1UTS. „\ (Jtlift To PCS Industr`T Terms Personal Comnuulicalions senices INN - \ bru,ld rule(. III Irle(nnunulul,Ilunl.,tluu'. 1h,11 tn,Ihlr prlglb \ dlld drU(r, In I UIIIIIIIIIIII',dr Illd(.prlOcill nl Iol dlloll. I'I.s III-Mol'h, dlld dr\II r, optl'llr n\rl .1 \\Idr ItIII_r ''I II(.gll('ll( Ir, .I„I_II1'll JIIII ,Illlhnl'I/(.d h\ ille I'rdrldl (,olllloolo dllnil, ( I)IIIIIII-inil Drtladnalld 111' \eN PCs - IlroJd1wild 1'1 „11111', lilt Illlle J \\Ili(' \ III(.I\ Ill IIIIIII\,111\1• III_II.d \nu I. JIIII 11.11,1 d .er\ I(r, Cellular Senice - \ I'l;s ,er\i('e th,li proude. Ikko-\\d\ \ulre .Inll (I'll'[ (nnnuulu(.lunn, Ihnnl_h Moot-h1 Id porldble. ,Ind ( ;11,mountrd phony: ,uul Ihroll_tl \\bell':• nuutenl, it olpor,ar(I lnln d(.0['1( . '11(11,l, kII)Inp I Illnpulrl• 111(1 elel'Irnnb nolebooh.. 0,11ohi, rdn filler rnhan(.(.d ledlure,sit( 'If d, \(ire 111;n1 ,Ind 1,ill kwilin_. 1,rn_I,Iptur ( o\er,l�"e ;beds for l elltd,u' senor ,u'e WI'\ hr�oc' ,Ind (.an co\,r rdi(.:. I nlullie:. ,Illd enure ,I,dr, PCS Is a family of services, Data Senice - the e1(.clrooic Iransler of d,lla or dio'ilill illforf Ilion. some of which exist today, such i;-Mail - the eledrooil' Iranslrr mml slorage of \\ritten messmt,'es. as cellular and paging, and some of which will be available Enhanced Specialized Monde Radio (1•;S11R) - \n anlicipal(.d I'I;S.rI'\u'r Ihal mutt Doer I\ul-a,n \nu(.,uul Bala eommumc;ltions Ihrouah hand-held and (.ar motulled phones mill mrouw'h \\irelrs: modem; incorpomW(I into soon, such as narrowband and de\i(.es such as portable (.ompulers mill elet'trooir ootehoohs. FS\IR is r\pect(.d In oller imam enhanced 11',dure: broadband PCS. :uch as \oiee mail mill eau \\milina. f,eographir :(.nice mwrilgc areas are mitieipaled to he \(.r\ large. ,uul rlla\ comer (ilies, coilnti(.s. and rnlirr slates. Demand for PCS is extraordinary Imaging-- the Irulslnis,ion of still inlat;es such as lames. pirltlre,. or,lide,. By 2003 we predict there will be over l67 million Slibscrl - P Ilonile Data - \ I'I:S .(.hire Thal is e\pr(led to pro\id\\i e I\\n-\\,I\ rrlrsltum s (nnunuou,ill Ir\I, vnouJ r(. ',._.11r, , \101)11(' d,dd poI(.!IIIJII\ \111co Itle.,Il_e, JIIIn111 ('nllll)IlIvr,. 11('I',ollml dlfllldl J"I,I.IIIIS..IIIII d ll,lb,l,r, ,rIA II r, ( ,III tions to PCS services. Rdft I)1'o\IIII'll b\ ,I Illllobel, o1 ledloolo_ic" III('ll J, ('('iltil'o.. I°ts. mobile ,.lieuile..Illl I'SM 1, \\ell .I, livi"1111•, hillil PCS services, such as cellular (.\(Iw I\I'1\ lol' (I,lla ITS dpph(.abolls. and paging, enjoy growth _ Mowle satellite - \ IlcS ,vm('v Ihal i, allu(ipmled to iwimIIe 1\\o-\\.I\ \Ili((. ,IIIII doimilllm(o(I .11.l (,a lll, ,111 l llalln�nd rates as high as `0%. ,,Ilelble, hand-held Whom':. did \\ir(.I(.s: loollelus inrorpnr;ded blto de\i(cs ,och ,I, oolrhooh (nnipulri, II i. led 111,11 \lol)Ill' ;.Itelllle ,el\in'e "ill olll'I' I'lihmll('('ll ledlore: ,Ildl ,1, ('111 \l dlllll:; and \glee IIIIIIi. (,ru_I'�11)h I( As additional PCS services and `I'11I(.1' (o\1'rd_l' 1, JIIII('II)iIIv I to he IJr_('IIhdil Illo,) I'I:s s'n l('(', and IIII\ ('%('If be \\orld-\\Ide features become available, the \arro►►bana ITS - senb(.: 111,11 are ('\p('l led In Ill('Iode ,Id\mn(ed \dire pJ_ul_. I\\o-\\.I\ It kiln\\ir11M'i111'ill rangeofwirelesscommunications d,Il,l nu',,,I_ul_. ,I1111 both one-\\d\ ,Iml I\u)-a11\ nu'„<l-Do and I,l(.oni1v choices available to individuals l'aging - \ Ill"), ,(.hire Ihdl prnudr, prnn,u'Ib one k\a\ Dirt dud data (nnununu dbnn. ,11( If Il, ,I \III(c of rlrl Irnnu and businesses will continue Im'„d_(.. or ,I 11,11,1 ir�Iwdcr to d pd;;er of ,I de\i('e ,1101 ,I, ,l Idplop (ompnl(.r \\Ilh J hndl 111 p,l_(.r. l,rn_I,11110( ,I'I\11 to grow. (n\er,i_r ,u(.,I, for pJ_ln_ ,u'(. \rn Idr_e \u1h ,N11W pm_ul_ pro\dlrr, ou(.rin_ 11,111on-kkutr i o\rr.l_c Personal Digital \sstsl:►nl or Personal Conlmunicalor - \ hand held drvl(' 111,11 Iwitnlnl, I Innnulrl The Federal Communications will \IIII I' Ind d,11,1 I ��IIIIIIIIIIII „- Commission allocated 140 Milz of radio spectrum for the Personal Mobility - \ Irdldl(. uldl I11,1\ Ill, ourll'11 Ilk ,nil(. 0 ,rl'\n,. \\Ill( It Il.i( h, .'Ild 111111„ 1 „11, 11111 pro\ision of new PCS IIII(Ille.lboll In'I)v(III(' p('opl(' 1,1111ri Ih,ln,p(dl' lotduos, services. Personal \11111ner - \ I(.Ivolloor IIIIIIIh('1 Ih'll 1 ,I'Swli (I lu ,l IwI,00 Jlid II111 .I.1•n_l"11111( i1I'lllnll ,I11 11 .1, .1 I(',Id('nle of ,I lllhlll(',. smarl Cara - \ (u'dil (,o'd-lihr dl'u( r ('q)dblr ill ,Inrn1_ ,Ind udnslenul_ utlulnl,llunl Ir_,bdm_ file I ud, IN'l I I nnunIIIIH dllnl,. d(.u( r, ,11r11 d, h,md-Ileld ,Ind (,11' phone,. oolrbnnk I nulpubv, ,old prl,undl dlatdl .I„I,I,un, Ihi, nduntl,(Uno (nnld uu ludr hu\\ the III(.[ \\nuld hhr Ihrb phony I,111, II,Indlyd nmlllnd III p,l\nu'nt ,Intl Ihr u,rl For more information, contact: prr,un,Il ounlhrl relepoinl - \ I'I.s.rmur Illdl (,Ill pinudr rdlu't nor Ili Wit \\,l\ \111w.Ind d,ll,l I lnnnlunu,lrinn, Ilnnn_u 11'In1-11011 j111nIU', lid l.lrl lillw( d,\II(.,'11111 J, (.I(.I'llnllll Ilnl(.111lik, 11 I, tllll( IPJlrll IIIII Irll'IIIIIIII ,rl\II r, \\III 1 \11 !11 I _en_I',Ipllll illy. ,III11 ull('I I,\\,I Wolol'(', lll'lll 11111(.I If 1 .,I'\I( I', ,III II J• I r 11ilJl IIUI I'l, ,II 1 I''W'I 11' II r Personal Communications Industry Association 1019 Nineteenth Street, AIV Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 2021467-47 70 Fax: 202-467-6987 11de l hall -I lit, 1-11.( 1111111( 1, 11 ,Illd 11 111 11, 111 \lilt r ,11111 Ill, lloll \Id1'n It►ice \lail - illy 1-11.1111 )1111 ,II1IJ_I' III I,III,II'I 111 JI1111111' lilt, .I_1', IIIIY'll'ss 1.\\s - \\II I'll'„ I.In.II \Ir l \rl\\olh, iI.\\,I IIn\tic \\IIt' It", I III In 111111, 1,1 111'\III" 11( !1 I "1'•I''' 11�111 PI111 .illd III'I,I 111�1 1 1_Il�d .I„I,1�1111, Ill 111111-1 dl'\II (', .11111 111 \\ Ill•Ir„ I \\, ,1Ir l.\I1I'11, 1 1r j11I\ill' Il,rl _Inllll, ,III 11 1, 1 IIII,IIIr„ \\IIIIIn ,I II11,111 11krIJ_e ,III', ,II( h .I, ,1 1111,11If- 1 .'Ill )11, 111 11I1\\ill, \kll Ilirt Iesti I'll\ - \\ urlr„ I'It\ I, .I I'l s .I nif I. inn h 1, r„rnL[,ill\ ,1 \knelt„ tul,lnr„ II 1rph11111 \n11 11 11.11 \\nrlr„ I'II\ ,rlAII l. AVill illnU(lt, Ihr'.1111r IrJIIIU', IIIII dr,l•1n1) hil'IIII'„ I1lrjllU111r, 11IIIrlllly III��knIl' , ,1 II k1Ill l. 11111 ,Ind IIll tr-\\.n I1,I1,1 (Inlet tn(m1_. Ill, phollr l6dld,rl \\ill hr I nnilr„ will Illy 11,1.1 ,;Ills ICI 111'I11 In..II r(r1\1' �..I, \\Ilrll'\ri Ill. of ,I'r IIII\ N. \\Ilhlll,I „fin(' 1n\I'I,i_I' Jlyd I n\tIJ"1' ,!Ic,I, lul \\l11•I1„ I'M „11 I,!I( Ill.;!,' In hr pIIIIIJI II\ \\II IIIII hild(hll_, "[Ili Ili IIH111rd 11111d oq ,II( II .I, .I IIII,l11r„ 1 �Ililnll, ICI .I Ilri_IIhol lln�111 sponsored In Ericsson Rosiness Conunonicalions Inc.. som Corporation of \nu•rira, t '' and 11ollolola 1'1•rsonal 2'onrinunicaliolls. ATTACHMENT 1 coax O 0 Om E> QH � cn as c mV0 a � � 0 J O ccm M :E o0 a m� o 3 A L m 3 s L O Z cn _c O O -j 'o 0 a) 0 cn a� 0 2 ATTACHMENT 8 U. ou CD 0 CL 0 IL 0 Kk uj m PH #2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-026 REQUESTS: 1. CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-323. 2. APPROVAL OF INSTALLATION OF SIX PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (PCS) WIRELESS ROOF -MOUNTED ANTENNAS AND TWO RADIO EQUIPMENT CABINETS. LOCATION: SIMON MOTORS AUTO DEALERSHIP BUILDING, 78-611 HIGHWAY 111 APPLICANT: PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES PROPERTY OWNER: SIMON FAMILY TRUST REPRESENTATIVES: PLANCOM, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-323 WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IS RECOMMENDED FOR CERTIFICATION , AS ALL IMPACTS CAN BE MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF INSIGNIFICANCE. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: MIXED/REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (M/RC) ZONING: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (CR) DISTRICT WITH A NON- RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY (PREVIOUSLY C-P-S) The proposed antenna will be located on the roof of the existing Simon Motors auto dealership building at the southwest corner of Highway 111 and Simon Drive, east of Washington Street (Attachment 1). The dealership was approved by Riverside pdm.101 County and constructed during the time when the City of La Quinta incorporated in 1982. Surrounding Zoning/Land Use The property surrounding the project site is designated as follows: North Shopping Center South Vacant land East Vacant Land West Vacant Zoning: ►-. Regional Commercial Regional Commercial Regional Commercial Regional Commercial General Commercial Scenic Highway Commercial Scenic Highway Commercial Scenic Highway Commercial Scenic Highway Although the new zoning code is in effect, this application is being processed under the previous code standards because it was filed prior to the effective date of the new code. The requirements have not changed significantly. Antenna projects, such as this one are regulated by Zoning Ordinance Chapter 9.218 - Standards for Commercial Communications Towers and Related Structures. These regulations permit antennas in any zone with an approved conditional use permit. The purpose of the tower ordinance, as it relates to this project, is to minimize adverse visual effects through careful design, siting, and screening; to avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from structural failures; and to limit radiation emitted by telecommunications equipment so that it will not adversely affect human health. The technical aspects of how the wireless digital PCS system works are contained in Attachment 2 of this report. JUDIRM PIETTgUsil • a The project consists of the installation of six 19.5 feet tall antennas and two equipment cabinets on the roof of Simon Motors. The antennas are Personal Communications Services (PCS) wireless antennas that will be a part of a network of cell -sites for the new Pacific Bell Mobile Services system. The six antennas will be stabilized by base anchors as indicated on the large plans (Attachment 3). The equipment cabinets (BTS Units) will be placed toward the south roof area. These cabinets are constructed of metal, and are 5'3" high x 2'5" deep x 4'3" wide. The requested engineering certifications pertaining to structural soundness and electromagnetic emissions have been submitted for the proposed antennas and equipment, and are found as Attachments 4 and 5. The proposed antennas will be clustered behind the existing square sign parapet (12' deep x 20' wide x 5' to 7' high) on the roof adjacent to Highway 111, with the antennas rising above the parapet about 24 inches. No modification is proposed to pclm.101 the sign parapet. The antennas measure 6.3" wide and 2.7" thick, and are. 54.3" long. They are mounted on top of a support pole. The antennas weight 11 pounds each, and are made of aluminum/ABS in a silver metallic color. The wind load rating is 100 miles per hour. The applicant has submitted photographic simulations of the proposed antennas (Attachment 6). The antennas will be accessed for routine monthly maintenance via existing roof hatches from inside the building. The proposed antenna location is in the C-P-S Zone -Scenic Highway Commercial (now CR zone). The development standard of the C-P-S zone that applies to this project is that of height. All buildings and structures are limited to fifty feet in height. The existing highest point on the Simon Motors building is 35' 6" at the top of the sign parapet. The proposed antennas will reach to 37' 3", under the fifty foot maximum permitted height. This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on July 24, 1996. All property owners within 500 feet of the dealership were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required. Staff transmitted a copy of Pacific Bell's request to all public agencies and City departments on May 20, 1996. Responses were received from CVWD, IID, the Fire Department, and Building & Safety Department. No comments of significance were offered by these agencies. Where applicable, comments have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. Environmental Assessment 96-323 was prepared for this project. Possible impacts were identified for aesthetics and health risk issues. Health risks have been proven to be minuscule, and aesthetic impacts will be insignificant. Therefore, a mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is recommended. The proposed project is within the path of a distinctive viewshed with a high sensitivity for impact as indicated in the General Plan Master Environmental Assessment (MEA). The primary focal point is designated as Viewshed No. 3 in the MEA, and extends from the mountains at Point Happy southwest of St. Francis of pclm.101 Assisi Church, and up into the cove. The three clusters of antennas will be installed behind the existing sugn parapet which will hide all but 24 inches of the antennas and is not a significant impact. The antennas will be thin enough that it is anticipated that they will blend with the surrounding scenery. A condition of approval has been included to require that the metal surface be treated with a nonreflective surface and color that will result in the antennas being almost invisible to the eye. A study of the potential electromagnetic fields emitted by the proposed antenna was prepared by Richard Tell Associates, Inc. (Attachment 5). The study concludes that the transmitted signals will be negligibly small in terms of concerns over possible hazards that might come about from human exposure to the signals. Staff has reviewed this Pacific Bell Mobile Services request to install antennas on the roof of Simon Motors and does not find any cause for concern pertaining to health risk issues. Aesthetically, the antennas will be largely hidden by the existing roof parapet. The antennas will be thin enough that they will become almost invisible at street level. The project complies with existing provisions of the General Plan, and the previous Municipal Zoning Code, including Chapter 9.218 - Standards for Commercial Communications Towers and Related Structures. Findings for approval are included in the attached draft resolution. Adopt Resolution 96-__ certifying a mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 96-323; and, Adopt Minute Motion 96-_ approving Conditional Use Permit 96-026, subject to the attached conditions of approval. Attachments: 1. Location.Map 2. Digital PCS System Information 3. Large Plans (Planning Commission only) 4. Structural Information 5. Electromagnetic Field Evaluation (Richard Tell Associates, Inc.) 6. Photo simulations Prepared by: SLIE J. OUR UAND Associate Planner Submitted by: CHRISTINE DI IORIO Planning Manager pchn.101 Planning Commission Resolution 96- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-323 PREPARED FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96- 02E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-323 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ofthe City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24th day of September, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 96-323 and Conditional Use Permit 96-026; and, WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 96-323); and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said Use Permit will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Use Permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly, in that no significant impacts have been identified, and less than significant or potentially significant impacts can be addressed by the incorporated mitigation measures. 2. The proposed Use Permit does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, due to the lack of any such factors existing on or near the existing facility. eares322.cup Planning Commission Resolution 96- The proposed Use Permit does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, with implementation of the monitoring program. 4. The proposed Use Permit will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. The area is established infill subdivision, with infrastructure to support such development already in place, and the proposal is considered an ancilliary part of the e)dstmg structure which will not effect an increase in growth through any modification of the existing conditions on the site. 5. The proposed Use Permit will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. Supporting documentation submitted by the applicant indicates that microwave emissions associated with the proposal will be substantially below nationally recognized safety threshholds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: That the recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 96-323 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, attached hereto, and on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 24th day of September, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABLES, Chairman City of La Quinta, California eares322.cup Planning Commission Resolution 96- ATTEST: JERRY BERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California eares322.cup ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Assessment No. 96-323 Case No.: CUP 96-026 Date: June 3,1996 L Name of Proponent: Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) Address: 2955 Red Hill Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: 714-825-8088 (Darrell Daugherty, Rep. - PLANCOM, Inc.) Agency Requiring Checklist: City of La Quinta Project Name (if applicable): Conditional Use Permit 96-026, PCS antenna installations at Simon Motors, 78-611 Highway 111. CITY OF LA QUINTA Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 eawn.001 II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population and Housing Biological Resources Utilities Earth Resources Energy and Mineral Resources X Aesthetics Water Risk of Upset and Human Health Cultural Resources Air Quality Noise H Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance II. DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least, 1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a `potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated". An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signature A,1- // Date June 3, 1996 Printed Name and Title Wallace Nesbit, Associate Planner For: Cky of La Quinta, Community Development Department x n Ci,J9 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (source #(s): X b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? X c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible hand uses)? X d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? X 3.2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? X b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? X c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? X 3.3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or ` expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? X b) Seismic ground shaking X c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X e) Landslides or mudflows? X f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? X g) Subsidence of the land? X Potentially Potentially Significant Las Than Significant unless Signifiant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact h) Expansive soills? X i) Unique geologic or physical features? X 3.4. WATER. Would the project result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? X c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? X f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? X g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? X h) Impacts to groundwater quality? X 3.5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any air quality standard, or contribute to any existing or projected air quality violation? X b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? X c) Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? X d) Create objecti,onal odors? X Potentially Potentially Significant Leas Than Significant Unless Sigaificant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the project result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? X b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? x c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? x d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site? x e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? X f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? x 3.7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? X b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? x c) Locally designated natural communities, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? x V d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 3.8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? Potentially Potentially Significant Leas Than Significant Unless Significant N. Impact Mitigated Impact Impact K K K U 3.9. RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? K d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? X e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? K 3.10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? K b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? K 3.11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? K Vi i10 T Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X 3.12. UTILITIES. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X b) Communications systems? X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? X d) Sewer or septic tanks? X e) Storm water drainage? X f) Solid waste disposal? X 3.13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X. c) Create light or glare? X 3.14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? X b) Disturb archaeological resources? X c) Affect historical resources? X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? X b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X 4. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. INITIAL STUDY - ADDENDUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-323 PREPARED FOR: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-026 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES 2955 RED BTI.L AVENUE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 714-825-8192 PREPARED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 June 6,1996 Amended August 28, 1996 N TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Project Overview 3 1.2 Purpose of Initial Study 3 1.3 Background of Environmental Review 4 1.4 Summary of Preliminary Environmental Review 4 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 2.1 Project Location and Environmental Setting 4 2.2 Physical Characteristics 4 2.3 Operational Characteristics 5 2.4 Objectives 5 2.5 Discretionary Actions 5 2.6 Related Projects 5 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5 3.1 Land Use and Planning 6 3.2 Population and Housing 7 3.3 Earth Resources 7 3.4 Water 8 3.5 Air Quality 8 3.6 Transportation/Circulation 9 3.7 Biological Resources 9 3.8 Energy and Mineral Resources 9 3.9 Risk of Upset/Human Health 10 3.10 Noise 11 3.11 Public Services 12 3.12 Utilities 12 3.13 Aesthetics 13 3.14 Cultural Resources 14 3.15 Recreation 14 4 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 15 5 EARLIER ANALYSIS 15 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The City has received an application for a Personal Communications Service (PCS) wireless communications facility, to be located on top of the Simon Motors auto dealership at the northwesterly corner of Simon Drive and Highway 111. The applicant indicates that PCS technology is rapidly emerging and will allow more lightweight, easy -to -use and less expensive mobile communication through its digital technology. The facility consists of six PCS antennae and two radio equipment cabinets. The original proposal was that the equipment be mounted on the flat roof structure, with the antennae extending approximately 19 feet above the relative roofline. Overall, each antenna would be 37.5 feet from existing grade and guyed to the roof. The latest proposal is to locate the antennae behind the existing Simon Motors sign parapet at the easterly roof corner of the building. The parapet sits higher than the section of the roof structure previously proposed for siting; therefore the antennae will reach 41 feet from existing grade to top of the antenna.The antennae are a paddle -style, measuring 6.3"x 53.3"x 2.7". These antennae will extend 5.5 feet above the sign parapet,with the mounting structures completely shielded. The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency for the project review, as defined by Section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A lead agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project which may have a significant effect upon the environment. The City of La Quinta, as the Lead Agency, has the authority to oversee the environmental review and to approve the proposal. 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY As part of the environmental review for the proposed project, the City of La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared this Initial Study. This document provides a basis for determining the nature acid scope of the subsequent review for the project. The purposes of the Initial Study, as stated in Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, include the following: • To provide the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) or a Negative Declaration for the project; • To enable the applicant or the City of La Quinta to modify the project, mitigating adverse effects before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact status; • To assist in the preparation of an EIR, should one be required, by focusing the analysis on potentially significant impacts of the project; • To facilitate environmental review early in the design of the project; 8 4 • To provide documentation for the findings in a negative declaration that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; • To eliminate unnecessary EIR's; and • To determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. 1.3 BACKGROUND OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was deemed subject to the environmental review requirements of CEQA. The Environmental Officer for the Community Development Department prepared this Initial Study and addendum for review and certification by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta. 1.4 SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This Initial Study checklist indicates that there is only potential for significant environmental impacts to aesthetic considerations, relative to issue areas as identified in the Environmental Checklist. However, standard mitigation (conditions) is usually required of all project types. Mitigation measures have been recommended in a Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MNIP) which will reduce any potential impacts to insignificant levels. As a result, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be recommended for this project. However, revisions made by the applicant to the plans after completion of this assessment have reduced the aesthetic impact to a level of insignificance over the original proposal (refer to Section 3.13). Mitigation measures Rroposed for each issue area are underlined within the discussion, and are summarized in the Mitip;ation Monitoring Program attached to this addendum. Any changes made by the applicant to the project as a result of this assessment, design review or other reason, which would necessitate changes to this addendum, are shown in italics as part of the issue area which any such changes may affect. SECTION 2; PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City of La Quinta is a 31.18 square mile municipality located in the southwestern portion of the Coachella Valley. The City is bounded on the west by the City of Indian Wells, on the east by the City of Indio and Riverside County, on the north by the City of Palm Desert and Riverside County, and federal and county lands to the south. The City of La Quinta was incorporated in May 1982. 2.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The proposal is sited on the roof of an existing commercial building. The antenna equipment associated with the project will be partially visible from most angles of view, although the hip roof structure towards the front areas of the building will screen most of the frontal visibility from Highway 111. The equipment consists of six paddle antenna panels (two per mounting post) and two electrical equipment cabinets. This also reduces the number of antennae stands from six to three. _11 cJ 2.3 OPERATIONAL C11ARACTERISTICS The proposed antennae and equipment will not be accessible to the public. It will require its own electrical and telephone service. The related equipment will require periodic maintenance one to two times per month. No employees will be located on site. 2.4 OBJECTIVES The objective of the project is to provide the capability for expanding mobile telecommunication services through increased areas of coverage, improvement of coverage in areas with diverse topography and accommodating heavier service demands. 2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS A discretionary action is an action taken by a government agency (for this project, the government agency is the City of La Quinta) that calls for the exercise of judgment in deciding whether to approve a project. The proposed project will require discretionary approval from the Planning Commission for the following: Certification of the Environmental Assessment for the project. Approval of Conditional Use Permit 96-026. 2.6 RELATED PROJECTS There are no current projects pending on this site. However, CUP 96-025 has also been submitted by Pacific Bell for a similar equipment station at the La Quinta Village Shopping Center, about 2.5 miles south of this site, with an alternate location at the Plaza Tampico commercial complex 114 mile west of La Quinta Village Shopping Center. SECTION 3• ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the establishment of this facility. CEQA issue areas are evaluated in this addendum as contained in the Initial Study Checklist. Under each checklist item, the environmental setting is discussed, including a description of conditions as they presently exist within the City and the areas affected by the proposed project. Thresholds for significance are defined either by standards adopted by responsible or trustee agencies or by referring to criteria in CEQA - Appendix G. 31 3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING Regional Environmental' Setting: The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, in the eastern portion of Riverside County. The valley is abundant with both plant and animal life. Topographical relief ranges from 237 feet below mean sea level (msl) to about 2,000 feet above msl. The valley is surrounded by the San Jacinto Mountains, the Santa Rosa Mountains, the Orocopia Mountains, and the San Bernardino Mountains. The San Andreas fault transects the northeastern edge of the valley. Local Environmental Seating. The proposed project site its located at the northwesterly corner of the intersection of Highway 11 and Simon Drive. The project site is generally in the north portion of the City. There are existing single family homes nearby, across Washington Street to the west. The site is a developed commercial structure, which will house the proposed equipment. A. Would the project conflict with the general plan designation or zoning? No Impact. The proposed project site is currently zoned C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial), with a General Plan designation ofMixed/Regional Commercial. The City recently adopted a revision to the entire Zoning Code; this site will be zoned CR (Regional Commercial) effective September S, 1996. The rezoning will not affect the proposed application requirements or processing. B. Would the project conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? No Impact. The City of La Quinta has jurisdiction over this project. The primary environmental plans and policies related to development of the project are identified in the La Quinta General Plan (LQGP), the La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment (LQMEA), and other previously prepared documents (see Earlier Analysis section). The project site is within 'Redevelopment Area #2, which generally incorporates the northerly portion of the City. The redevelopment plan for the City relies upon the General Plan to indicate the location and extent of permitted development. As a result, the development of the project is also consistent with the adopted Redevelopment Plan. C. Would the project affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? No Impact. The site is developed as a commercial retail building; as such, there is no agricultural operation in existence. D. Would the project disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income! minority community)? VA No Impact. The proposed communication equipment will not have any disruptive or divisive impacts on the surrounding areas. There will be no changes to existing land uses or any physical changes which could cause any such impacts. 3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSING Regional Environmental Setting. - Between 1980 and 1990, the population of La Quinta expanded 125%, as reported by the U.S. Census, making it the second fastest growing city in the Coachella Valley. The number of permanent residents increased from 4,992 to 11,215.These figures are based upon information provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the State Department of Finance, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). The City's population as of January 1996 is estimated by the State Department of Finance to be 18,046 persons. The housing stock as of October 1995, is listed at 9,080 single family units, 173 multi -family units, and 247 mobile homes, for a total of 9,500 units. Local Environmental Setting. The proposed project site is proposed atop an existing auto dealership. The site is surrounded primarily by existing commercial and vacant land. A, B, C. No Impact. 7'he proposed communication equipment will not generate any additional population. It is not anticipated that any impacts on the population as projected by the LQGP will occur due to this project. The proposed equipment is necessary to allow expansion of digital communication services in the area. This expansion of service is not anticipated to induce any substantial physical growth.There are no housing units currently on the proposed project site. The proposal will not have any impact which would displace existing housing in the area. 3.3 EARTH RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta has a varied topography, from gently sloping alluvial fans and steep hillsides, to relatively flat desert floor. 'The alluvial soils that make up most of the City's soil types are underlain by igneous -metamorphic rock, as seen in outcrops in the Santa Rosa Mountains and the Coral Reef Mountains. Soils on the `Valley floor are made up of very fine grain unconsolidated silty sands. Faults in the area include the San Andreas fault located several miles to the north of the City. Local Environmental Setting. The project site is an existing auto dealership. The site is developed with an older commercial use and incorporates some stormwater relief facilities, primarily through street improvements. Surrounding properties are vacant, but have been exposed to site disturbances in the recent past. Faults within the City include two inferred faults transecting the southern section of La Quinta. One is located approximately 2 miles southeast of the project site; the other is roughly 4.25 miles south. No recorded activity from these faults has occurred (Source: LQGP; LQMEA). A through I. No Impact. There will be no housing or other habitable space established with the proposal which could result in or expose people to seismic ground shaking or fault rupture. The building is an existing structure built to standards in effect at time of its construction (late 1970's). Installation of the radio equipment and antennae will not result in any potential seismic impacts not already in existence. The proposed project will not require any earthwork, and does not involve any potential for impacts associated with any geologic or physical features related to geologic or seismic concerns. 3.4 WATER Regional Environmental Setting. Groundwater resources in the La Quinta area consist of a system of large aquifers (porous layer of rock material) and groundwater basins separated by bedrock or layers of soil that trap or retain groundwater. La Quinta is located primarily in the lower Thermal Subarea of the groundwater basin. The Thermal Subarea is separated into the upper and lower valley sub -basins near Point Happy Ranch, located southwest of the intersection of Washington Street and State Highway 111. Water supplies are also augmented with surface water from the Colorado River transported via the Coachella Canal. Local Environmental Setting. The project site is developed with a commercial use and adequate drainage facilities to control storm and nuisance waters. A through H. No Impact. The project will not increase the amount of impervious area within the site. The site is developed with the necessary flood control facilities which were required when the site was developed. The equipment: proposed will not create flood hazard impacts. The proposal will not result in any additional runoff from the project site. Placement of the antennae and equipment will not result in a condition which would increase any water levels or runoff. 3.5 AIR QUALITY Regional Environmental Setting. The Coachella Valley is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and in particular the Southeast Desert Air Basin (SEDAB). SEDAB has a distinctly different air pollution problem than the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). A discussion of the air quality conditions, jurisdictional organization and requirements is found in the La Quinta MEA. In the Coachella Valley, the standards for PM 10 are frequently exceeded. PM 10 is particulate matter that is 10 microns or less in diameter that becomes suspended in the air due to winds, grading activity, and by vehicles on unpaved roads, among other causes. Local Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta is located in the lower Coachella Valley, which has an and climate, characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent and low annual rainfall, and low humidity. The City is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 30, which includes two air quality monitoring stations, one located in the City of Palm Springs and the other in the City of Indio. The Indio station monitors conditions which are most representative of the La Quinta area. The station has been collecting data for ozone and particulate matter since 1983. The Palm Springs station monitors carbon monoxide in addition to ozone and particulate matter and has been in operation since 1985. In 1995, a third station was setup in North Palm Springs to strictly sample PM10 based solely on natural blowsand events. This E information will help determine the amount of exceedance which occurs due to non-anthropogenic causes of PM 10. A through D. No Impact. It is not anticipated that there will be any air quality impacts associated with the operation of the proposed equipment. 3.6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Regional Environmental Setting. La Quinta is a desert community of over 18,000 permanent residents. The existing circulation system is a combination of early roadwork constructed by Riverside County and new roadways since incorporation of the City in 1982. Key roadways include State Highway 111, Washington Street, Jefferson Street, Fred Waring Drive, and Eisenhower Drive. Existing transit service for La Quinta is limited to three regional fixed -route bus routes operated by Sunline Transit Agency. There are some existing pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian facilities in La Quinta, however, these systems are minimal at present and are to be completed as new developments are constructed in the City. Local Environmental Setting. - The project site at the northwesterly corner of the Simon Drive/Highway 111 intersection. The existing auto dealership has all paving and parking area improvements in place. A Through G. No Impact The proposed equipment will not generate any additional traffic. No traffic related impacts in any of these issue areas can be associated with the proposal. 3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta lies within the Colorado Desert. Two ecosystems are found within the City: the Sonoran Desert Scrub and the Desert Transition. The disturbed environments are classified as urban or agricultural. A discussion of these ecosystems is found in the La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment. Local Environmental Setting. The project site is developed with a commercial use. Street improvements have been completed within and around the site. There is a limited amount of vegetation which was imported as part of development of the site. A through D. No Impact. The proposal will not involve disturbance of any area not already disturbed by development. The equipment will be located entirely upon the roof of an existing structure. 3.8 ENERGY AND NIINERAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta contains both areas of insignificant and significant Mineral Aggregate Resources Areas (SMARA), as designated by the State Department of Conservation. There are no known oil (s .4 10 resources in the City. Major energy resources used in the City come from the Imperial Irrigation District (IID), Southern California Gas Company, and gasoline companies. Local Environmental Setting. There are no oil wells or other fuel or energy producing resources on the proposed project site. The project site is located within MRZ-1, a designation for areas where there are no significant resources present, or it is determined that little likelihood exists for their presence (Source: LQMEA). A, B. No Impact Installation, operation and maintenance of the equipment will not impact any aspect related to mineral resources. 3.9 RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH Regional Environmental Setting. Recent growth pressure has dramatically increased the City's exposure to hazardous materials. Such exposure to toxic materials can occur through the air, in drinking water, in food, in drugs and cosmetics, and in the work place. Although large scale, hazardous waste generating employment is not yet located within La Quinta, the existence of chemicals utilized in dry cleaning operations, agricultural operations, restaurant kitchen cleaning, landscape irrigation and exposure to large electrical facilities may pose significant threats to various sectors of the population. Currently, there are no hazardous disposal waste sites located in Riverside County. Transportation of such materials out of and around La Quinta takes place. Local Environmental Setting. In order to comply with AB 2948-Hazardous Waste Management Plans and Facility Siting Procedures, the City of La Quinta adopted Ordinance 184 consisting of a Hazardous Waste Management Plan. The project site is currently developed with a commercial shopping center. A. Would the project involve a risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? Less Than Significant Impact There is only minimal risk from potential emissions associated with operation of the PCS digital antennae. This technology is represented as less intensive due to its re -use, or recycling, of radio chamiels between non -adjacent facilities. No other risks have been identified or are anticipated. According to Pacific Bell, PCS transmitters, by design and operation, are low -power devices. Even under mwdrnum exposure conditions where all channels are operating at full power (a rare occurrence), public exposure from a PCS facility is typically —1 microW/cm2 (micro -watts per square centimeter). This level of exposure is more than 1,200 times lower than the current ANSI or National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) public exposure standards, and about 20 times less than a standard household microwave oven. A report prepared by Richard Tell Associates, Inc. for the site, shows that the emissions associated with the equipment proposed for this PCs station will achieve a maximum power density value of 1.53 microW/cm2. This value is indicative that radiofrequency levels will not present any significant risk, as the typical maximum exposure levels that could result inside the Simon Motors building willbe less than 0.7 microW/cm2. B. Would the project involve possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11 No Impact. Establishment of the equipment will serve to assist in communications associated with emergency response situations. There will be no adverse impacts. C. Would the project involve the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to 3.9.A. No health hazards are anticipated due to the proposed equipment location. The anticipated emissions associated with the proposed digital PCS technology are seen as minimal, and should not pose a significant potential hazard to the employees on site; there are no residential areas within 500 feet of the proposed equipment locations. A Would the project involve exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? No Impact. There are no existing health hazards on the proposed project site. The proposed project does not involve habitable area which upon occupation would expose people to any existing health hazard potential. E. Would the proposal involve increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? No Impact The proposed project will be sited on the rooftop of an existing structure. No vegetation is present or proposed with this location. Potential mitigation for aesthetic impacts may require plant materials for partial screening of the antennae structure, but none of these materials will pose any flammable hazards. 3.10 NOISE Regional Environmental Setting: Noise levels in the City are created by a variety of sources.. The major sources include vehicular noise on City streets and Highway 111, and temporary construction noises. The ambient noise levels are dominated by vehicular noise along the highway and major arterials. Local Environmental Setting: The ambient noise level at the project site is dominated by vehicular traffic noise from Highway 111, the closest major arterial, as well as on -site noise from automotive repair and new/used car preparation activities. The site is not considered a noise -sensitive land use. Residential uses are located to the west across Washington Street. (Source: Site Survey; LQIVIEA). A, B. No Impact It is not anticipated that there will be any measurable increase in existing noise levels resulting from the equipment location. The site is atop a commercial structure along a heavily traveled highway; installation and operation of the equipment should not impact existing noise levels, and will not create any exposure to severe noise levels. 12 3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES Regional Environmental Setting. Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department extends service to the City from existing facilities located in the City of Indio. Fire protection services are provided to the City by Riverside County Fire Department. The Fire Department administers two stations in the City: Station #32 on Old Avenue 52, at Ave. Bermudas, and Station 970, at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54. Desert Sands Unified School District and Coachella Valley Unified School District serve the City. There are two elementary schools (one existing, one under construction), one middle school, and one high school with the City. These schools are with the Desert Sands Unified School District. The City is also within the College of the Desert Community College District. Library services are provided by the Riverside County Library System with a branch library located in the Village area of the City. The existing library opened in 1988 and contains 2,065 square feet of space and approximately 18,000 volumes. Health care services are provided to the City through JFK Memorial Hospital in Indio, and the Eisenhower Immediate Care Facility located in the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. The Eisenhower Immediate Care Facility is a satellite clinic of the Eisenhower Medical Center, located in Rancho Mirage. (Source: LQMEA; LQGP.) Local Environmental Setting. The nearest fire station to the project is Station #32, located approximately 3 miles southwest of the project site on Frances Haack Lane. Governmental services in La Quinta are provided by City staff at the Civic Center and by County, State, and Federal agency offices in the desert region. A new elementary school is under construction west of the site on the north side of Calle Tampico. A through E. No Impact. The proposed equipment will not have an impact on any governmental or other public services. The equipment will only require electrical service, which exists at the site, and will be maintained by Pacific Bell. 3.12 U'T LIMS Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta is served by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) for electrical power supply and the Southern California Gas Company (SCG) for natural gas service. Existing power and gas lines and substations are found throughout the City. General Telephone Exchange (GTE) provides telephone services for the City. Continental CableVision services the area for cable television service. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides water and sewer service to the city, as well as maintaining storm water facilities in the City. CVWD obtains its water from underground aquifers and from the Colorado River. The City is served by Waste Management of the Desert for solid waste disposal. Nonhazardous., mixed municipal solid waste is taken to three landfills within the Coachella Valley. 13 Local Environmental Setting. AU utilities exist at the project site. A through F. No Impact. The equipment will not require any new or altered utility systems. The required electrical service already exists in the building which will support the equipment. 3.13 AESTHETICS Regional Environmental Setting: The City of La Quinta is partially located within a desert valley cove. There are hillsides to the west and south of the City. Views of the desert and surrounding mountains are prevalent on clear days throughout most of the City. Local Environmental Setting. According to the LQMEA, the project area is in the pathof a distinctive viewshed emanating from a point approximately I/Z mile south of Miles Avenue along Adams Street. The area between the viewshed and the primary focal point (Eisenhower Mountain) is almost entirely developed with residential and commercial structures; the site itself is developed with a commercial building. A. Would the proposal affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located in a densely developed residential and commercial area in the northerly portion of the City. The Simon Motors building is located along Highway 111, which is designated as a Primary Image Corridor in the La Quinta General Plan. The proposed project will incorporate PCS antennae and equipment on the roof of an existing auto dealership. The viewshed from the northerly residential areas will not be significantly affected by the antennae, as they will appear nearly two-dimensional in appearance from any measurable distance. It is not anticipated that there will be any similar impact to residential views from the west, as there are no eastward focal points identified. As there is essentially no mass to the antennae structures and supporting guy wires, there will be no obstructions to existing views. Refer to Section 3.13.B. for discussion of revised application impacts. B. Would the project have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? Less Than Significant Impact. Relative to the siting and structural orientation of the existing building and desigh, the proposed project is not considered to present a significant aesthetic impact in conjunction with existing development in the area. There is an existing antenna structure at the front of the roof at the business identification sign. The proposed antennae will be lower than this structure, and will only be about 21 inches higher than the business identification sign on the roof. The antennae are set towards the center areas of the roof, which will reduce their visibility from the surrounding street levels and should be almost completely obscured from ground level views along Highway 111. In order to reduce the view of the antennae and enhance the viewline along Simon Drive, the applicant will be required to establish a minimum 3 foot high (measured from the to,V edge of the elevation) continuous vegetation line, or similarly effective alternative. along the southeasterly roofline of the building The screening shall extend from the existing hip roof structure to the rear edge of the flat roofline, and any 14 vegetation shall consist of drouaht tolerant plantings which require minimal maintenance. The applicant has submitted revised plans which reduce the impacts associated with aesthetics. These plans show the antennae located behind the existing sign parapet, extending 5.5 feet above it. The revised proposal will have a negligible aesthetic impact due to the minimal mass and limited additional height associated with it's installation. The only potential impact relates to visual appearance. The antennae structures shall be painted a neutral color in order to reduce visibility and blend in against the surrounding environment. C. Would the project create light or glare? No Impact. The proposal does not incorporate any lighting as part of the current approval request. Any proposed lighting fixtures would have to comply with provisions of the Outdoor Light Control Ordinance, through review by the Community Development Department prior to any installations. 3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting: The most likely locations of prehistoric cultural resources in the La Quinta area are along the foothills. However, many sites have been found on the open desert floor area. Isolated milling features, sparse lithic scatters, and isolated pottery scatters have been found throughout the City. The settling of La Quinta area has been chronicled by the La Quinta Historical Society in several publications and museum exhibits. There are 13 designated historical structures and sites recorded on the California Historic Resources Inventory. These resources are listed in the La Quinta General Plan. Local Environmental Setting: The project site is a developed building rooftop; there is no potential for any cultural resource recovery. Any potential resources would have been addressed during the approval and development of the site during that process. A through E. No Impact. There is no potential for impacts to any aspect of cultural resource issues. The site has been developed with a commercial use, and the proposed equipment will be located on the existing rooftop. 3.15 RECREATION Regional Environmental Setting. The City of La Quinta has an adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan that assesses the existing resources and facilities and the future need of the City. The City contains approximately 28.7 acres of developed parkland for Quimby Act purposes. The 845.0 acre regional Lake Cahuilla County Park is not included in this count as it is a county facility. There are also bike, equestrian, and pedestrian trails within the City that are designated in the General Plan. A, B. No Impact There is no probability that the proposed equipment placement will impact existing or planned recreational opportunities. The proposal will not affect or create any demand for recreation. (' e' 15 SECTION 4: NVIANDA'FORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The Initial Study for the proposed PCS equipment indicates that there will be no unmitigable significant adverse impacts upon the environmental issues in the checklist. The applicant has revised the proposal to reduce the potential aesthetic impacts; additional mitigation related to the applicant's revisions has been incorporated into this document. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) has been prepared for this project based upon this environmental assessment. The following findings can be made regarding the mandatory findings of significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines and based on the results of this environmental assessment: • The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, with the implementation of mitigation measures. • The proposed project will not have the potential to achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals. • The proposed project will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. • The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly. SECTION 5: EARLIER ANALYSIS A. Earlier Analyses Used. The following documents were used and/or referred to in the preparation of this assessment: • La Quinta General Plan Update; October 1992 • La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment; October 1992 • Pacific Bell Mobile Services Fact Sheets; PCS Antenna Safety • Analysis of electromagnetic fields produced by PBMS proposed PCS facility, Richard Tell Associates, Inc.; July 1996. These and various other documents on file with the Community Development Department were used in the preparation of this Initial Study. B. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Not applicable. No impacts were identified from the proposal which were not directly related to installation of the proposed antennae and equipment. Site specific mitigation has been incorporated. C. Mitigation Measures. Mitigation measures are discussed in this addendum where underlined. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan (M[MP) has been prepared for the project that will become a part of the conditions of approval attached to the project approvals and permits. r� , Prepared by: Wallace H. Nesbit Associate Planner Date: 8l--9l9(, 16 W E-� Q z� U U w U z F c� GQ z� 0 0 w� as w r a � o >4 �za Mz o W E^" H U Q Q ax �W O U d W E U F� � O a coy �G W z ¢Q a� U � W O U W F� U z N5N 1� [HN i Hy F z � W F1 (T® 1+� a' Mz za o W H W �.. U op z Q Q W C1. � W U q W _H U z h C7 W � CA � H z z � W C� w o a� W � � F Mz o za w � Q Q W � U � W ® U Q W U E-� C7 z CLl � O � z -Z W � w � a 4-4 0 Mz ® zCO w Q z CO ¢� a x U O x U U Q W F� a U z c� _z ca �o z 0 0 a. w as 0 w r a z 34 cn z z CO el; ® ebb o m rn �w U A U u ®m u u oar U C7 O� � � a a o `pa �® c� a ® zoo e4z A U U U 6� Ga. O O M aN CN U 9z u ®m u u C� C� N 1� PI q®q � P� P�1 M 4 C) 4 Co ^N u O� UU U E� O� o U G� Q � o•o �o U U U U � a �r Gsi O W a �". �c E� A A U u E-� n� G4 � � a o U s� E� A U pq �A U O� .0 o b°' c U � oa q •O a. c ou JAI a b b o� A a� 04 vsk O A A 0 a� ea �po rA .005 o CC �"+ es •• o u Lr C cn O 1+1 ON m a¢ aw U Yol z� L.i u u CJ G� GS G�. � w a o m A� z� a�x uu � a 00 z� is+ G� � a 0 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-026 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES - SIMON MOTORS SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 1. Development of this site shall be in substantial conformance with Exhibits approved and contained in the file for Conditional Use Permit 96-026, unless amended by the following conditions. 2. The approved Conditional Use Permit shall be used within one year of City approval date of September 24, 1996; otherwise, it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Be used" means beginning of substantial construction toward installation of antennas and equipment cabinets as allowed by this approval. One year time extensions up to a total of two extensions may be requested pursuant to City requirements. 3. The exterior lighting plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The Arts in Public Places fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Prior to final building inspection, a black nonreflective coating shall be placed on the exposed surfaces of the antennas to prevent glare. The coating shall be approved by the Community Development Department. 6. Upon their approval by the City Council, the City Clerk is authorized to file these Conditions of Approval with the Riverside County Recorder for recordation against the properties to which they apply. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for installation of any antennas or equipment cabinets contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances, if necessary, from the following public agencies: * Fire Marshal * Public Works Department * Community Development Department * Riverside County Environmental Health Department * Desert Sands Unified School District * Coachella Valley Water District * Imperial Irrigation District * California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) s •' The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from these jurosdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. 8. No signs are permitted as part of this approval. 9. The applicant shall pay all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for the plan checks and permits. 10. Within three days after Planning Commission approval, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department a check payable to the County of Riverside for $1,328.00 This fee shall be forwarded to the Riverside County Clerk's Office for payment of the State -required Fish and Game Fees and administrative handling fee. 9 SIMON MOTORS SITE Z PAC BELL MOBILE SERVICES CASE MAP 4a NORTH C`SEN0. CUP 96-026 LOCATION MAP SCALE: NTS �T TAC,HMENT wl' H A. T7 V S; r� ./ J f Simply stated, PCS (Personal Communications Services) is a family of customized wireless communicattonssenicesaud devices that allow, you to communicate anjilme and virtually anjithere. We're alreadyln the midst of the PCS revolution. Car phones, portable phones, and pagers are 6eeeing you to carry on o1Bce and personal business where and when you choose. And a new generation of PCS WH continue the ,revolution: small phones the size of ejeglass cases rfeighhing o* a few ounces, wireless computers the size of a notepad and devices that combine both. are part of the PCS future that is just around the corner. Physical connections between computers and phones or computers and computers are being supplemented by Wreless links. .Ind a variely of enhanced featiues can allow3ou to customize your communications service to III your mobile lifestyle. PCS is changing the mkv vve live imd manage ourtiv es, and these changes are just beginning. A Family of Services PCS: The For Families On The Move How large an impact will PCS have on family and business life in the comi IblecommunicaU,ons years? Let's look at theMillers. a typical family in the N ear 1998, for an answr Frontier werFamiYftfile ITS emerged x%ilh the introduction of car phones. portable phones. pagers and fay products. But this aas only the begimling of a \\irelcss rcNolution. 'fechnolmn r\ists toda\ to prrnide nca ITS seiliccs such as lelepoint. \O'cless PBV and Inobile Beata as \V11 as products which combine and data SVIAices such as a personal digital assistant. Ililh the completion of the FCC's spech'um allocation and licensing process form% ITSsereices. thee\plosi\egr(mth of winless communications \01 continue. Susan Miller: Sales representative for computer company. Donald Miller: Independent engineering consultant. Robbie Miller: Age 16, high school junior, track team star. Although Susan's business takes her out of town an average of once a moni she never feels disconnected from her office or family. Wherever she goes, sl carries a portable phone that gives her family, clients and coworke immediate access to her, just as if she were in town. But she also is in comple control, able to select which calls to accept. Susan especially enjoys tJ convenience of never having to search for a pay phone and knowing she never out of touch. Donald's business takes him from site to site across the entire metropoft area. With his powerful note pad -sized computer and pocket phone, he c< receive stock quotes, make airline reservations, pay bills aU keep in touch with his family. Donald can also dial directly in his computer network from virtually any location, send faxc and transfer information to and from his office computer. If Donald chooses, he can leave his communications devia at home and simply carry a "smart card." The size of a crec card. a smart card enables him to access his communication services using other people's equipment. Robbie's PCS is limited to calling certain numbers includir home and his parents' work places. So if he's running late track practice or has car problems, he can easily reach h parents. Convenience? Yes. Security? Donald and Susan stet much more soundly knowing that Robbie is part of the personal communications network. )4any Services - At bur FMgertips When you speak about personal communications services, you are really talking about being in control. Imagine the ability to perform virtually any task at the time and place of your choosing. It may be as routine as checking your credit card balance or as complex as sending a fax or video mail message to your entire sales force from the field and even holding; a video teleconference from your hotel room. With PCS, cnur world is at your fingertips. Reach People - Not Places Some PCS services feature a "personal number," a phone number that is associated with a person, not a physical place. When someone dials your personal number, the call is directed to wherever you are, either by ringing the PCS handset you are carrying or by sending the call to a phone near you. A Worldwide Revolution Around the world. in places such as Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Bong Kong and Singapore. the full potential of PCS is beginning to be realized as new PCS services are already available to the public. Today in the United States, the regulatory path is being cleared for the explosive growth of business and residential use of personal communications services. ("ou•r illwy pholos: 1 pprl ul) •"ur 1 I611 ; , rhrI'll plurnr I �nl r1 Irll 1 nr ••��u l ur.r� uurlr.. I'l;\ 1�nu•1 m_!tl 16�'�nn1,r �drruurA �� lu. _'null i5 r.nndl Irh'Pllnlli' 11rh•Ipn11ll) Guide To PCS Industry Terms Personal Communications Services (11CS) — \ broad range nl 11'lt'l )[]fill III] raliolls srllu rs Mal rn,lblr propl \ and dr\ines In coin [fill niratr independent of location. I'CS nctaorh: and de\irrs oprridr o\rl ,, \udr r ulgr ul Irequrncies assigned and authoriicd h\ the Federal Communications Commission, Broadband or \eiii ITS — Broadband I'CS seniors include a \kick \arid\ of inllowli\r digital \nice ,Intl d,aa d sen tees. Cellular Senicc — \ I'CS senior that p'IM(Ics h\o-\\a\ \Dien and data ronununirations through h nut held. AT -A- GLANCE portable, and car mounted phones and Ihrnugh \\ircicss modems incorporated into dc\irrs such as laptop uonpulels and electronic notebooks. Cellular can oiler enhanced features such as \nice mail and call \\ailing. Geugriq,hir rou'rage arras for cellular smite are \en large. and can cou'r cities. counties. and rnlirc slates. PCS Is a family of services, Data Senic'e — the elrcIronic transfer of Bala or digital information. some of which existtoday, such F-Mail —The electronic transfer and storage of written messages. as cellularand as cellular and paging, and a of ble Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (I;S11R) — \n anticipated ITS seni(,e that \\ill oller twmi,a\ \Dire anti soon, such as narrowband and data communications through hand-held and car mounted phones and lhrough airrirss modems incorporated into deices such as portable computers and electronic notehooks. GS\IR is e\pectrd to ollcr man\ enhanced leatures broadband PCS. such as %oice mail and (,all \\gating. Geographic ser\ice courage auras are anticipated to be u'n large. and min tour cities. counties, and entire states. Demand for PCS iseMordinaiy. Imaging —The transmission of still images such as faws. pictures. or slides. By 2003 we predict there will be over 167 million subscri - A Mnnile Data — \ 1'cs Senicc that is e\perned no pro\fide h\o-\\a\ \\irl'less communication of Iev. \Dire nn'ssage:. ilr polrntialh \idea nussagcs among computers, personal digital assistants. and datahasrs. \lohile Bala senin', can I Lions to PCS services. MQU proOlcd h\ it number of Icchnologirs such as cellular, ]It's. mobile satellite. and EMIR. is \\ell as nrt\\orks built PCS services, such as cellular e\rlusiuh for data I'CS applications. and paging, enjoy annual growth Mobile Satellite — \ ITS Senicc that is anticipated to pro\idc Mimiin \Dire and data nummullicalions using rates as high as 40%. satellites. hand-held phones. and \\inless modems incorporated into deices such as notrhook computers. It is mpecied that llohile Satellite senices \\ill ullcr enhanced features such as call \\ailing anti \nice mail. Geographic As additional PCS services and senin, coicrage is anticipated to be larger than most ITS scniccs and ma\ eon be \\oriel \\ides features become available, the \arroii►band ITS — Senicc, that are mfivctetl to include athanred \oiee paging. t\\o-\\in ackno\\ledgemem range0fwh'elesscommunicadons paging. data nessaging. and huth one -\\a\ and l\\o-na\ messaging and lacsimile. choices available to individuals Paging — \ ITS smite that pro\fdes primarih one \\a\ \nice and clala communications such its it \oim or clrrtrunk and businesses will continue message. or it dicta Irallsler. to a pager or it de\i(,e such as if Izplop computer \\ith if bull in pager. Geogralddn •enrol to grow. rouragc areas for paging are \1,1'\ large Will some paging proOlvi's ollcring natiolmOle rn\rraltt'. Personal Digital \ssistani or Personal Communicator — \ hand held dr\ire that performs conlpulrr The Federal Communications luncllons snt•h its Bala elun or relrie\iog information h•om it database. ohen idong \\Ilh ,nine ,Intl d'lla I Illumunlra- Commission allocated 140 li"""enine`. MHz of radio spectrum for the Personal liobilih — \ lealurc that milk be olfered In some ITS .mine, \\bich banks and route: nau, and provision of new PCS inlormation to specilie people ratinr than specific locations. services. Personal \amber — \ telephone number that is assigned In it person and not it geographic Iocalloll sliIl is a residence or it business. Smart Card — \ credit card -like dc\ice capable of storing and Iranslerring information regarding the card, user II runununlCations (Imices such as hand-held and car phones. oolebook cunipWers. and personal digital assistants. I'his information could include ho\\ the user \\ould like their phone calls handled. nnthod of pa\mrnt. and the user: For more information, contact: prrsonill InIIIIher. Telepoini — \ IlCS smite [hill ran pro\ide eilher one or I\\tl \\a\ \nine rind data rnl,IIIII1111faliolIS Ihruugh h.nul-held phone: and elecli•unic de\ices such as electronic notebooks. II is milicipatrd Ihal Irlepouil senines \\III t n\rr snlalll geographic alms and oller le\\er lectures than other I'CS srnices such as nrllular and I'FS. a1 it lo\u'r pot e. Personal Communications Industry Association. 1019 Nineteenth Street, MW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. 2021467-4770 Fax. 202467-6987 lideo Mail —Ihr rlrnlrunic sturagr and trausler of \Dior attd million \tdrn mrssagrs loice Mail — fit(, electronic storage or Iransler of audible messa-ocs. ►►fireless I.\\s — \\ irelrss Local \roil \elaorks II, \\s) proOle \\ireless 1 nnnet Uun, Inc drums sot 11 a, purlahlr nnlpulrrs ,nut personal digital assistants In other deices iuul In d,dalmsrs. \\ irelrss I. \\s .Ire e\prrlrd In hr hut11 k IIPI\rite 11s1'I, g1'111111s stich is a bw illr:s \\!thin it >Illall coWrilgr a11'a s111'll is I business 1 a111ptis or Ito\\IIIII\\II 111'a Wireless I'M — \\unless I'B\ is a ITS ser\ine \\kith is essrntialh a Mrefe.: business Irlephune 11 is r\prclyd thin \\unless I'li\ scr\Ice \\ill pro\idr the siune Waluns that desktop business Irlephonrs t urrenlh prrnulr Sul It ,r \nice mad 111(1 IIII•re-%l\ Irleconlerencing. the phone handsel \\ill he rordlcss. \\nh the user ahh' In both make and I'rrl'I\t' Calls Wiereur he or she nla\ he \\shin it scour cu\eragr area. Cu\rragr alms for \\ finless I'll\ If(, ,aill( ipidrll to hr primarih \whin huildim"s and in ildined outdoor areas such is a busun'ss bongos o1 a nrichborhood. Sponsored h% Ericsson Business Communications Inc.. Sour Corporation of \nucrica. ° {. and Motorola Personal Communications. DAPA@ KIT A In the U.S. & Canada. dial 1-800-325-D, 180 M Model 58000 / 58010 92°, 15 dBd PCS Panel (a member of the DAPA QuintStarT'" family of PCS panels) a 270 H-plane E-plane N GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Frequency Range 1710 - 1990 MHz Impedance 50 S2 VSWR < 1.4:1 i Polarization Vertical i Rated Power 500 W ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS Beamwidth: H-plane 920 ± 30 (at -3 dB) E-plane 70 ± 10 (at -3 dB) Maximum / Minimum Gain 15 dBd / 14 dBd Electrical Downtilt 00 (available -10 to -150) Side Lobes < -15 dB Front -to -Back Ratio < -25 dB MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS Height x Width x Depth 53.3" x 6.3" x 2.7" (1353 x 159 x 68 mm) Weight 11 Ibs (5 kg) Wind Survival Rating 125 mph (200 km/h) i 0 Wind Load (at 100 mph) 363 N (frontal Ft) i 160 N (lateral F2) Flat Plate Equivalent Area 2.31 ft'- (0.22 m'- ) Connector Types (Female) Type N, or 7/16 DIN Materials: Antenna / Radome Aluminum / ABS 26 DAPA Communications, Inc. - Olean, NY 14760 USA - Tel 716 373 7228 - Fax 716 373 5758 RICHARD TELL ASSOC. ATES, INC. July 29, 1996 The City of La Quinta c/o PLANCom, Inc. 2955 Red Hill Avenue Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92727 ATTACHMENT Reference: Analysis of electromagnetic fields produced by a Pacific Bell Mobil Services proposed Personal Communications Service radio communications facility (Roof top antenna installation, Simon Motors, Site CM-454-11)(APN# 643-120-001). To whom it may concern: Summary: This letter report conveys my findings in regard to an evaluation of the electromagnetic fields that could be produced by a Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) base station proposed to be installed on the roof of Simon Motors located at 78611 Highway 111 in La Quinta, California. The communications facility proposed is a part of the PBMS network to provide Personal Communications Service (PCS) in the region. The evaluation has been prepared to address the issue of human exposure to the electromagnetic fields (signals) that would be transmitted from the antennas that would be situated atop the Simon Motors building roof. As detailed in this letter report, the analysis shows that exposure levels that could possibly be experienced in the vicinity of the proposed installation are extremely low when compared to applicable standards for human safety. The maximum power density that would be expected in the vicinity of the proposed project, including locations at the base of the tower, will not exceed 1.53 microwatts per square centimeter. This low value may be compared to a power density limit of 1,305 microwatts per square centimeter recommended by the American National Standards Institute and 1,000 microwatts per square centimeter recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements for continuous human exposure to electromagnetic fields. Based on this analysis, it is concluded that the electromagnetic fields that would be produced as a consequence of operation of the proposed PBMS communications equipment will comply with all applicable health protection standards. Maximum exposure levels that could result inside the Simon Motors building will be typically less than 0.7 microwatts per square centimeter. The maximum value of 1.53 microwatts per square centimeter is more than 32,600 times less than the threshold for hazardous effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields at the frequencies used by the PBMS system. The extremely wide margin between the projected field power densities, under worst case conditions, and applicable standards leads to the conclusion that arguments against the project based on concerns over impact on public health are not scientifically defensible. (702) 645-3338 9 FAX (702) 645-8842. 8309 Garnet Canyon Lane • Las Vegas, NV 89129 PBMS Simon Motors Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 2 Background: Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) has proposed to install several antennas which would operate in the 1,958 MHz frequency range on the roof of the Simon Motors building at 78611 Highway 111 in La Quinta, California, to add Personal Communications Service (PCS) coverage in the area. The present analysis was performed to evaluate the magnitude of electromagnetic fields that would be produced by the proposed new antennas. Electromagnetic fields were computed based on theoretical considerations of the antennas and were expressed in terms of power density in the unit microwatts per square centimeter (1iW/cm2) and compared to the most recent exposure standard established for electromagnetic fields and human exposure recommended by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI, 1992). Resulting power densities were also compared to the exposure criteria recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP, 1986). Description of Transmitting Facilities: The proposed transmitting antennas would be placed atop the Simon Motors building at a height of 37 feet to the center of radiation of the antennas above the ground. Three sets of transmitting antennas would be placed on the roof in such a configuration as to provide for a so-called sector type coverage of the transmitted signals; each set of antennas would favor a particular direction. In operation, a maximum of two transmitters would be used for each of the three sectors and each transmitter has the capacity of producing a maximum of 25 watts of radiofrequency (RF) power. When used with the directional antennas, a maximum of approximately 200 watts of effective radiated power (relative to a dipole antenna) will be produced in each of the three general directions of 0, 120 and 240 degrees. This effective radiated power (ERP) represents a practical constraint on the system imposed by communications engineering issues; higher ERP could lead to interference with communications with other base stations. For purposes of this analysis, however, an assumption was made that the absolute maximum ERP that could ever be achieved with the given equipment could exist even when, in practice, a lesser value may be used. In this fashion, power densities that are greater than those that would actually be encountered will be found and, hence, the analysis results will be highly conservative in that they will over project the RF field magnitudes. The base station will operate on a frequency of 1,958 MHz. Each antenna has a characteristic radiation pattern which helps concentrate the transmitted signal outward toward the horizon, tending to reduce the strength of the signals at steeply downward directed points beneath the antenna. The antenna proposed for use is the DAPA Communications Model 58210. This antenna exhibits a maximum gain of 14.9 dB relative to a halfwave dipole and possesses an electrical beam tilt of 2 degrees below the horizontal. The azimuth and elevation plane radiation patterns are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Analysis Approach: Electromagnetic field power densities were computed based on the antenna radiation patterns, transmitter power, losses of the transmission line connecting the transmitters to the antennas, their height above ground and distance from the antenna PBMS Simon Motors Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 3 installation. In addition, an assumption was made that the RF fields will be reflected from the ground and lead to an enhanced power density at locations near the ground. Power density was computed using the formula: S _ PTx2xGa xl.64xLx2.56xl.0283 x 100 4n •R2 Where S = ground level incident power density, (µW/cm); PT = maximum possible transmitter output power, (W); G� = antenna power gain in downward direction, based on the actual elevation angle below the horizontal to the antenna and the adjacent points of interest; L = transmission line loss between transmitter and antenna (2.6 dB or a factor of 0.549); R = distance between the transmitting antenna and point of interest, (m); The factor of 1.64.in the formula relates to the gain of a half -wave dipole, the reference for antenna gain for the types of antenna used for the PCS; the factor of 2.56 in the numerator accounts for ground reflections that may exist and which can theoretically increase the apparent power density by a factor of 2.56 when the electric fields radiated directly from the antenna and those reflected from the ground add in phase with one another. This factor is based on field measurement data collected by the Environmental Protection Agency and is recommended for use in power density calculations by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC, 1985). For the calculations of power density resulting from the proposed PBMS antenna, the maximum number of simultaneously operating RF channels was assumed to be two (this corresponds to the factor of 2 in the numerator and accounts for a possible two transmitters connected to each antenna). Power density calculations were made for a height of six feet above the ground to correspond to the nominal height of a standing individual. The factor of 100 converts the power density to units of microwatts per square centimeter. The factor of 1.0283 in the numerator accounts for the small increase in total power density that occurs because of the simultaneous operation of three antennas. See the following Analysis Results section for more detail on this issue. Analysis Results: The RF fields that will be produced by the proposed installation will be strongest along the pointing directions of the three different sectors, i.e., along 0, 120 and 240 degrees. Because of the directionality of the antennas in the azimuth plane, the power density along any radial direction will be principally caused by the antenna most closely aligned with that direction. Nonetheless, the power density even along a given antennas pointing direction will be slightly influenced by the RF fields radiated by the other two antennas. This effect was analyzed by examining the relative ERP that would result in various azimuthal directions, compared to that ERP that would exist with only one antenna operating. The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 3. In this figure, it is seen that the relative ERP can be as great as 102.83% of the single antenna value, 05 PBMS Simon Motors Mectromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 4 meaning that the simultaneous operation of the two antennas not pointing in the same direction add about 2.83% to the power density. In other directions, the resulting composite power density can be as low as 58.43% of the value along any one of the given sector directions due to its antenna. This minimum power density value occurs at the midpoint between the main beam directions of the various antennas, i.e., at 60 degrees either side of the main beam. The slight enhancement of power density was, however, applied in the analysis to account for the possibility that all three antennas may be operating at the same time. Figure 4 illustrates the projected power densities that would result at various distances from the antenna installation. The power density varies in an oscillatory manner because of the various sidelobes of the antenna radiation pattern in the elevation plane; at different distances from the tower, the angle between the observation point and the antenna changes resulting in the antenna exhibiting a different gain and, thereby, producing a different power density near the ground. The maximum power density from the analysis is 1.53 µW/cm2 and this value occurs at 354 feet from the ' tower. Beyond this distance, the power density decreases. At the closest property boundaryto the tower, 68 feet distant, the estimated power density is 0.482 µW/cm . Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure Standards: Computed values of electromagnetic fields produced by the subject communications antennas were compared to various recommended limits for public exposure to RF fields. In particular, the recommendations contained in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in conjunction with the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the exposure criteria recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) were examined since the FCC has proposed adoption of new RF rules based on these guidelines. These ANSI/IEEE guidelines specify maximum permissible exposures for both controlled environments and uncontrolled environments, the limits for uncontrolled environments being five times more stringent in the frequency range applicable to the antennas being studied. The table below presents several electromagnetic field exposure standards or recommendations for the PCS frequency to be employed by the proposed project and the corresponding power density limits. Summary of Several Standards or Recommendations on Maximum Human Exposure Levels to Electromagnetic Fields Applicable at 1,958 MHz Standard Power density limit (µW/cm) Hazard threshold 50,000 ANSI (1992) 1,305 NCRP (1986) 1,000 IRPA (1988) 979 PBMS Simon Motors Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 5 Canada (1991) 1,000 United Kingdom (NRPB, 1993) 10,000 Australia (1990) 200 Russia (1984) 10 Worst case power density for proposed facility 1.53 The above table illustrates that the ANSI/IEEE, NCRP and other standards contain a significant margin of safety, being about 50 or more times less than the actual hazard threshold. This observation is particularly relevant since it means that exposure even at the power density limit specified by the standard does not imply that a hazard exists. Most of the standards recommend a maximum power density in the range of about 1,000 µW/cm2 with the United Kingdom recommending a power density approximately ten times greater and Australia and Russia having lower limits. Most striking is the very low value used in Russia of only 10 4W/cm2. While this value represents a very much more stringent limit than others used commonly in the West, this standard has come under criticism as not be based on sound science and as not being necessarily enforced in Russia. Regardless of the standard applied, however, the electromagnetic fields that would be produced by the installation of the PBMS facility are substantially less than any of the recommended limits, even the extremely stringent Russian guidelines. Further insight to the potential for excessive electromagnetic field exposure from the proposed facility may be gained by determining how close to the antenna one would have to be for the power density to reach the NCRP limit. Assuming that both transmitters are active, each operating at 25 watts, the distance in the main beam would be 2.12 feet, less than arm's length, from the antennas at which the general population exposure limit would be reached. This distance would apply only, however, to a point directly horizontal to the antenna in its main beam of radiation. Such a possibility is not reasonable for the proposed site since there are no other tall structures immediately adjacent to the antenna mounting locations. Conclusions: A theoretical analysis of the proposed PBMS transmitter installation at the Simon Motors facility shows that the resulting strength of the transmitted signals will be negligibly small in terms of concerns over possible hazards that might come about from human exposure to the signals. Maximum exposure levels that could result in the vicinity of the site will be more than 32,600 times less than the threshold for hazardous effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields at the frequencies used by the PCS system and are less than any of the standards or recommendations of the American National Standards Institute, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the International Radiation Protection Association, and the standards of numerous other countries, including the extremely stringent standard of the former Soviet Union. The extremely wide margin between the projected electromagnetic field power densities, PBMS Simon Motors Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 6 under worst case conditions, and applicable standards leads to the conclusion that arguments against the project based on concerns over impact on public health are not scientifically defensible. I trust that this letter report adequately addresses the technical issues associated with the transmissions from the proposed PBMS PCS facility in La Quinta. I have enclosed a copy of my personal resume to provide the City with information on my background and qualifications that are relevant to preparing this evaluation. If I can be of further assistance in answering questions that the City may have, please contact me. Respectfully yours, �� 0 W, 1 101, Richard A. Tell President Enclosure: Resume for Richard A. Tell PBMS Simon Motors Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 7 References ANSI (1992). American National Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992. American National Standards Institute, 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017. Australia (1990). Australian Standard AS 2772.1-1990. Radiofrequency radiation Part 1: Maximum exposure levels-100 kHz to 300 GHz. Standards Australia, 80 Arthur Street, North Sydney 2060, Australia. Canada (1991). Limits of Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields at Frequencies from 10 kHz -300 GHz. Safety Code 6. Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, National Health and Welfare, Canada, catalog no. H46-2/90-160E. FCC (1985). Evaluating Compliance with FCC -Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation. OST Bulletin No. 65. Federal Communications Commission, Ode of Science and Technology, Washington, DC 20554. IRPA (1988). Guidelines on limits of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 300 GHz. Health Physics, Vol. 54, No. 1 (January), pp. 115-123. NCRP (1986). Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Report No. 86. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. NRPB (1993). NRPB Revised Guidance on Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. An Introduction to proposed new guidelines. Conference Volume, Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London SW1, UK, Wednesday 31 March. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot Oxon OX11 ORQ U.K. Russia (1984). New Soviet population standard: 10 4W/cm2 at MW frequencies. Microwave News, Vol. V, No. 5, pp. 1-5. r r4 PBMS Simon Motors Liectromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 8 Azimuthal Gain Pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 Sector Type Antenna 15_ � 10 m 5: C C � - !�0 m ' m -5 -15 . -20 -25 -30 Up M ME OEM • 44M _ ad • � EM mtb r■ N WEEMORWEEMEN 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Azimuth angle (degrees) Figure 1. Azimuthal plane gain pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 sector antenna. Elevation Gain Pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 Sector Type PCS Antenna 20 Maxirhum gain is 4.9d d at - .degrees 10 o — -10 -20 -30 -40 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 Bevation angle below horizontal (degrees) Figure 2. Elevation plane gain pattern for the DAPA Model 58212 sector antenna. P PBMS Simon Motors Electromagnetic Fields Analysis Letter Report, page 9 105 100 "e 95 0 m 90 to 85 80 m 75 _ a 70: d 65: W 60 { 55 Relative ERP vs. Azimuth for Site CM-454 Expressed as a Percentage of the ERP for a Single Sector IM a ■ W� �■■M �■ r�r�r��■��r�. �■ IFl EWA �■ Mti NFM lNormal m #� ON ME momm Mai _�, � 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Azimuth (degrees) Figure 3. Relative ERP vs. azimuth for three DAPA Model 58212 sector type antennas mounted at 0, 120 and 240 degrees. Power Density vs. Distance for Site CM-454 Calculated at 6 Feet Above Ground with Ground Reflections Along Path of Any One Sector 1.6 1.4 E 1.2 u � 1 0.8 0 0.6 0.4 0 o. 0.2 0 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Lateral distance from antennas (ft) Figure 4. Power density vs. distance at 6 feet above ground adjacent to proposed antenna installation at the La Quinta Tower. Power density values include the effects of ground reflections and the simultaneous operation of three sector antennas each operating with two transmitters. RESUME SUMMARY Richard A. Tell Telephone: Work 702-645-3338 FAX 702-645-8842 Internet: rictell@accessnv.com President, Richard Tell Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in electromagnetic field exposure assessment and particularly the investigation of potential hazards. Formerly, Chief, Electromagnetics Branch, Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada, managing a program to support development of Federal regulatory limits for exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields and to assess environmental levels of electromagnetic fields. Experience Highlights (29 years of active work on electromagnetic radiation hazards-20 years in Federal Government and 9 years private consulting practice) • Radiofrequency radiation exposure standards development • Laboratory management • Environmental field studies of nonionizing radiation • Computer modeling of RF population exposure • Automated RF/microwave measurement systems • Generation of highly accurate electromagnetic fields • Research on bio-effects of weak, pulsed magnetic fields • Theoretical analysis of near -field properties of antennas • Absorption of RFenergy in man • EHV overhead electric power lines • Video display terminals (VDTs) • Evaluation of electromagnetic field instrumentation • Member, IEEE SCC-28 committee on RF hazards • Chairman, SCC-28 Subcommittee 4 Risk Assessment Working Group • Elected Member National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements • Chairman of NCRP Scientific Committee 78 • Member, NCRP Scientific Committee 89 on Nonionizing Electromagnetic Fields • Member IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) • Past participant in US -USSR scientific exchange on hazards of microwaves Education B.S., Midwestern University, Wichita Falls, Texas, 1966, physics and mathematics. M.S., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1967, radiation sciences. Personal Born 25 January 1944, Roscoe, Texas; U.S. citizenship; married; three children. Publications Approximately 60 reports and publications in the public domain. RESUME OF RICHARD A. TELL EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS Telephone: Work 702-645-3338 FAX 702-645-8842 Richard Tell Associates, Inc. 8309 Garnet Canyon Lane Las Vegas, NV 89129-4897 President of Richard Tell Associates, Inc., after twenty years of service with the Federal Government working in the area of electromagnetic fields as related to possible health hazards. During my private consulting practice, I have worked in a variety of projects including but not limited to: • Standards compliance studies (theoretical and field studies) related to RF fields at broadcast, radar, industrial RF heat sealer and induction, VDT, satellite earth station, high power short -wave broadcast and cellular telephone facilities; • Investigation of 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields associated with overhead power lines and building wiring systems; • Research on specialized measurement techniques and instrumentation for assessing induced and contact currents associated with RF hot spot fields and climbing of energized AM broadcast towers; • Operator exposure measurements for VDT operators using body mounted dosimeters; • Reviews of standards related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields; • Development of safety programs for use in companies where workers may be exposed to electromagnetic fields. April 1981 to Sept"alber 1987 Electromagnetics Branch Office of Radiation Programs -Las Vegas Facility U.S. Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 98517 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8517 Branch Chief, Electromagnetics Branch. Responsible for management of overall Branch program. The Branch was responsible for supporting the development of Federal regulatory limits on exposure of the general population to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and a nationwide radiofrequency measurements program to determine exposure Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 2 levels. This position included direction of a laboratory program which supported the environmental measurement activity and focused on the evaluation of instrumentation for nonionizing radiation hazard assessments. November 1976 to September 1987 A physicist responsible for the field measurements aspects of the ORP program to determine US population exposure to radiofrequency energy. My work in Las Vegas represented a continuation of work originated on the East coast. Responsibilities included establishment of a laboratory facility to support the field measurements operation and the supervision of two other physicists, a computer programmer, and four support personnel. In this position, I originated several technical studies in addition to the nationwide field measurements program: • Automated RF Spectrum Surveillance Systems - Developed second -generation computer controlled spectrum analysis system for mobile deployment throughout US. Specific capabilities included absolutely calibrated field strength measurements and specialized radar emission measurements such as determination of radiation patterns and average gain of rotating antenna systems. • NCRP Scientific Committee 78 - Chairman of Scientific Committee 78 of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements for the development of a report "A Practical Guide to Determination of Human Exposures to Radiofrequency Radiation." • Laboratory Electromagnetic Field Standards - Directed development of laboratory methods for establishing highly accurate electromagnetic field strengths for calibrating and evaluating measurement instrumentation. This included an automated TEM (transverse electromagnetic) cell for fields in the frequency range of 10 kHz to 300 MHz, waveguide exposure chambers for the frequency range of 300 MHz to 1 GHz and an anechoic range for the 1-60 GHz frequency range. • Radar Simulation - Used measured properties of radar signals collected via specialized surveillance techniques to synthesize the subject radar signals in the laboratory with emphasis on simulating the time varying field caused by antenna rotation or scan modes. Designed and directed development of methodology for computer controlled replication of such radar fields for evaluating response to these fields under controlled conditions. • VDT Emission Characteristics - Investigated various instrumentation approaches for characterizing the electromagnetic fields produced by video display terminals and simulation of these fields for laboratory testing of instrument response to these fields under controlled conditions. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 3 • Extremely -Low -Frequency Field Measurements - Assembled system for measuring ELF magnetic and electric fields in frequency range of 1-100 Hz and deployed system on West coast for measuring typical field levels originating from such sources as the Bay Area Rapid Transit System in San Francisco. Work also included the design and development of a system for generating know electric and magnetic fields under computer control using large parallel electric field plates and 1 meter diameter Helmholtz coils. • Investigation of Pulsed Magnetic Field Bio-effects - Investigated experimental methods used in studies of the biological effects of weak, pulsed magnetic fields on the development of the chick embryo. Designed a controlled system for careful and documented replication of study first reported by Delgado in Madrid to be performed by five research laboratories, supported by the Office of Naval Research, around the world in an attempt to determine if originally reported results were valid. Traveled to Madrid to confer with researchers as to exact methods and equipment used in experiments. • Acoustics - 'Used phase coherency techniques for direction finding of low frequency (40 Hz) sound waves in a residential environment. • RF Population Exposure Estimates - Developed a new propagation modeling method whereby environmental measurement data were used in conjunction with an automated population data base to determine population exposure which also provided a method of assessing the uncertainty in the modeling results. • Analysis of Near -Field Properties of Broadcast Antennas - Conducted analytical and experimental analyses of the near -field gain reduction properties of FM broadcast antenna arrays. This included measurements of near -field electric field values near a VHF dipole and electric and magnetic fields in the close proximity of AM standard broadcast and short -wave broadcast transmitting antennas. • Automated Data Bases - Developed automated data bases of U.S. broadcast stations and health care facilities suitable for computer based modeling and evaluation. • Absorption of RF Energy in Man - Reviewed available RF dosimetric data from viewpoint of assessing thermal loads on man resulting from absorption of RF energy. Made use of existing thermal stress data to examine how tissue temperature rise might be used as a possible basis for developing RF exposure safety standards. Measured RF currents flowing in man under influence of strong medium wave field strengths. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 4 ANSI Dosimetry Workgroup - Chairman of Workgroup III for evaluation of dosimetry in connection with revision of the American National Standards Institute C95.1-1982 RF protection guide. US -USSR Cooperative Program on Biological Effects of Microwaves - Became a participating member of the US -USSR cooperative program of scientific information exchange to further reduce unknowns in divergence between U.S. and the former USSR RF exposure safety standards. Traveled to five Soviet research institutes in 1978 as part of official scientific delegation. Interagency Agreements - Project Officer for interagency agreements with the National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colorado, for development of specialized monitoring antenna systems; the Institute for Telecommunications Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, for antenna calibrations and determination of antenna patterns; the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, for an analysis of the economic impact of future population exposure guidelines being prepared by the EPA; the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Washington, DC, for providing technical support to the FCC in the form of field investigations of RF fields at specific broadcast sites throughout the U.S.; the Battelle Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington, for the development of instrumentation for the measurement of 60 Hz magnetic fields in private residences. June 1972 to November 1976 Electromagnetic Radiation Analysis Branch Field Operations Division Office of Radiation Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Silver Spring, Maryand A physicist responsible to the Branch Chief for providing technical support in the development and implementation of an environmental nonionizing radiation (NIR) protection program. My work ranged from assisting in the initial development of the overall EPA-ORP NIIR program (a major aspect of which was to develop an environmentally applicable RF and microwave exposure standard) to assuming the primary technical responsibility of designing and developing a mobile electromagnetic radiation monitoring van to be used by the Branch in obtaining environmental data on RF/microwave radiation exposure. The van development project included equipment specification, procurement, development of overall system calibration procedures and application of the hardware systems to the accurate measurement of electromagnetic radiation exposure over a very wide frequency range (e.g., 10 kHz to 18 GHz). State-of- the-art techniques in real-time data acquisition and analysis, including hardware interfacing and significant, specialized software development and the design, development and evaluation of unique monitoring antenna systems compatible with the measurement requirements represented a substantial part of the work. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 5 This position involved activity in a number of other technical areas including the following: • NIR Population Exposure Determinations - Developed exposure model for AM radio broadcasting stations to use in a study to determine the number of people exposed to various levels of RF radiation. This involved the use of a computerized data base of the U.S. population. • EMI Effects on Cardiac Pacemakers and Electroexplosive Devices - Maintained close liaison with individuals both in the clinical and engineering areas dealing with detrimental interference to critical life support devices, such as pacers and electronic thermometers, to evaluate device susceptibilities to NIR. • RF Signal Propagation - Conducted studies to determine principal components of signals from broadcast stations after propagation depolarization phenomena in order to best design required monitoring antennas. • Computerized RF Source Inventories - Dealt extensively with the use of computer automated data files on RF sources within the U.S. via interaction with the Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis Center (ECAC), a Department of Defense installation in Annapolis, Maryland. Such files allowed relatively convenient evaluations of source types, densities, powers, etc., on a nationwide basis. • RF/Microwave Hazard Analysis - Extensive experience in the analytical evaluation of potentially hazardous RF/microwave situations. This included high power military radar, civilian air -traffic -control radar, satellite communications earth stations, marine and aeronautical radar units and AM, FM and TV broadcast stations. Detailed analyses of near -field phenomena were included. I conducted numerous field measurement hazard 'investigations of these types of sources. • EHV Overhead Power Transmission Lines - Conducted analytical evaluations (via computer methods) of the electric and magnetic field strengths beneath extra - high -voltage overhead power transmission lines. Measured electric and magnetic fields beneath various 345, 500 and 765 kV lines and compared results with calculated values. Investigated shock effects produced in the vicinity of lines due to current induction and standards for occupational exposure to these fields. • Acoustics - Measured acoustic sound pressure levels in the frequency domain, using spectrum analysis techniques, and developed a data acquisition program to determine the percentage of time that SPLs exceeded various thresholds. This work was done to determine the feasibility of using an adaptation of an RF measurement system to evaluate environmental acoustic noise levels. t�t.�t Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 6 December 1970 to June 1972 Engineering Physics Section Twinbrook Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Rockville, Maryland A research investigator (physicist) responsible to the Engineering Physics Section Chief for developing instrumentation, methodology, and a theoretical background of knowledge for microwave and radiofrequency dosimetry in several areas of related biological effects research. Designed and conducted studies aimed at determination of microwave dose and dose distribution in biological systems. Provided technical support related to the exposure of biological specimens to microwave energy and the associated dosimetry. This included studies of the mechanisms of interaction. Responsibilities included an active participation in consulting and working with biological investigators in other sections to develop the necessary technical support required for their studies. Specific areas of investigation included: measurement of dielectric properties of biological materials in the microwave range; interaction of microwave energy with dielectric materials; calculations of microwave reflection coefficients for multilayered tissue systems and resultant heating profiles throughout the systems; development of specialized exposure techniques for certain in vitro specimens to microwave energy; measurement of microwave dose rate and heating distributions in dielectrically equivalent phantom models; study of environmental levels of RF fields from sources such as radio, television and radar installations, theoretical estimates of field strengths and associated field measurements; set-up and operation of an extremely -high -frequency millimeter wave microwave apparatus for study of genetic effects of 86-95 GHz radiation on bacterial systems; measurement of reflection coefficients of rat corneal tissue over the above frequency range and investigation of effects of exposure on corneal opacities; study of microwave effects on human gamma globulins using immunological techniques in guinea pigs; use of liquid crystal techniques for mapping of thermal distributions in lossy dielectric absorbers. Assisted in the development of a microwave anechoic chamber an exposure facility operating at 2.45 GHz including a 3 kW generator. During this period I was involved in a short term (8-69 to 270) research assignment to New York University Medical Center to work on microwave interactions and effects on biological materials. While at the Twinbrook Research Laboratory, I developed a strong interest in acoustics and establishing an acoustic exposure facility for biological effects studies including the necessary related acoustic measurement capability. This problem was scoped, a position paper was developed on the subject of conducting noise bio-effects studies (including a comparison of long-term low level acoustic noise exposure with similar exposure to microwave energy by investigating the literature of noise bio-effects), and a proposal was developed for required equipment and materials for a basic acoustic exposure facility. ref Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 7 August 1967 to December 11970 Division of Biological Effects Bureau of Radiological Health U.S. Public Health Service Rockville, Maryland A staff physicist involved in research in several areas of applied radiological physics, ultimately related to human exposure to radiation. Worked in nuclear instrumentation including scintillation (liquid and solid), Ge(Li), proportional and ionization chamber detectors, thermolurninescence dosimetry, multichannel pulse height analyzers and associated electronics. Particular emphasis was placed on low energy (0-50 keV) x-ray measurements in characterizing color television CRT face plate attenuation properties. Included was service to other sections in the form of instrument repair or modification or consultation on setting up and instrumentation of experiments involving use of various types of irradiation (isotope injections, x-ray machines, high intensity Cs-137 unit). General responsibilities in health physics were a part of the job. Assisted in the construction of a very high intensity, low energy x-ray machine used for material characterization and experimental animal exposures. Field work involved estimating effective energies and depth doses from naturally occurring high level radioactive deposits using pulse height spectrometry and absorption techniques. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND B.S. degree, Midwestern University, Wichita Falls, Texas, 1966. Double major in physics and mathematics. Active in local chapter of the Texas Academy of Sciences, Collegiate Academy. Representative in student government. Served last two years as a laboratory assistant in, lower level physics courses. M.S. degree, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1967. Supported by USPHS fellowship. Major in radiation science. Included summer work at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York, with project work. Attended semester long series of seminars on college and university teaching. OTHER TRAINING • Biophysics, National Institutes of Health Graduate Program, Bethesda, Maryland, 1967. • USPHS training course in Gamma Ray Spectroscopy, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1976. • USPHS training course in Laser Radiation Hazards, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 1968. • Short courses in (1) Microwave Theory and Measurements and (2) Microwave Systems and. Spurious Electromagnetic Radiation; Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 1969. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 8 o Graduate course, Quantum Mechanics, The American University, Washington, DC, 1970. o Microwave Dosimetry Workshop, held at Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 1972. o Fundamentals of Minicomputers, a short course presented by the National Electronics Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 1973. o ADAPTS Minicomputer Training Course, presented by Varian Data Machines, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 1973. o Antenna Theory, a short course presented by Technology Service Corporation, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1974. o The Fast Fourier Transform and Applications, presented by FFT Systems, Inc., Washington, DC, 1976. o Numerical Antenna Modeling Workshop, including instruction on use of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Numerical Electromagnetics Code for wire antennas and the Ohio State University reflector antenna code, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1982. MILITARY SERVICE Selective service obligation completed August 1969 as commissioned officer USPHS. Attained rank of CAPTAIN, 0-6, Health Services Officer at time of separation, September, 1987. OTHER WORK ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES o Speaker at orientation courses for commissioned officers in USPHS at Rockville, Maryland and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. o Past member on Technical Subcommittee Working Group on Propagation within the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee Office of Telecommunications Policy. o Past member of IEEE Task Force on "Technical Basis for Selection of Interference Limits from Electric Power Lines and Stations." o Past participant in US -USSR cooperative program on biological effects of microwaves beginning August 1978. o Invited lecturer at NATO Advanced Study Institute "Advances in Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields," Erice (Sicily), Italy, March 28.-April 8, 1981. o Selected as Chairman of Working Group on Dosimetry (300 MHz - 100 GHz) for the American National Standards Institute C95.4 subcommittee (1983). o Selected as Chairman of Scientific Committee 78 of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) to develop a comprehensive report as a practical guide to the assessment of radiofrequency radiation exposure, January 1984. Resume of Richard A. Tell, page 9 • Selected as Chairman of Subcommittee-2 (Terminology and Units of Measurements) of IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee-28 (SCC-28), 1992. • Elected to membership on the IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR), 1992. • Selected to Chair the Risk Assessment Working Group of SC-4 in SCC-28, 1992. SOCIETY MEMBERSHIPS • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Senior Member), including: • Group on Broadcasting • Group on Electromagnetic Compatibility • Group on Microwave Theory and Techniques • Health Physics Society . • Bioelectromagnetics Society HONORS • Recipient of USPHS Fellowship for graduate study at Rutgers University; • Awarded USPHS Meritorious Service Medal in 1979; • Best Paper Award for 1979 for Journal of Microwave Power; • EPA Outstanding Performance Cash Award, 1986; OTHER PERSONAL DATA • Birth date: January 25, 1944; • Birth place: Roscoe, Texas, USA; • Marital status: Married to Valeria Ann Tell, three children; • Health: Excellent, no impairments; • Interests: Amateur radio licensee since 1959 (hold Amateur Extra Class license, K5UJU), computers. � PUBLICATIONS and REPORTS by RICHARD A. TELL (in the public domain) 1. Tell, R. A. (1967). Radiological Pollution from Uranium Milling in Surface Waters of the Colorado River Basin, Masters degree thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 31 pages. August. 2. Anderson, G. E., R. A. Tell, and H. D. Youmans (1970). Spectral Transmission and Attenuation of X-Radiation by Glasses and Resins Used in Color Television Receivers, IEEE Transactions on Broadcast and Television Receivers, Vol. BTR-16, No. 2, May, PP• 82-89. 3. Tell, R. A. (1971). Microwave Absorption Characteristics of Drosophila Melanogaster, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 155-158. 4. Tell, R. A. (1971). A 94 GHz Exposure System, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 150-152. 5. Blackman, C. F. and R. A. Tell (1971). Biological Response to Microwave Irradiation: Bacteria, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 106412. 6. Tell, R. A. (1971). Microwave Field Interactions in Tissue Systems, Twinbrook Research Laboratory Annual Report, Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 133-139. 7. Mills, W. A., R. A. Tell, D. E. Janes, and D. M. Hodge (1971). Nonionizing Radiation in the Environment, In Proceedings of the Third Annual National Conference on Radiation Control, Scottsdale, Arizona, pp. 200-211, May 2-6. 8. Tell, R. A. (1972). Microwave Energy Absorption in Tissue, EPA Technical Report, 53 pages, February [NTIS order no. PB208233]. 9. Tell, R. A. and J. B. Kinn (1972). Ocular Heating During Dental Diathermy Treatment, Journal of Oral Surgery, Vol. 30, pp. 284-287, April. 10. Tell, R. A. (1972). Reference Data for Radiofrequency Emission Hazard Analysis, EPA Technical Note ORP/SID-72-3, 28 pages, June, reprinted July 1976 [NTIS order no. PB220471 ]. 11. Tell, R. A. (1972). Broadcast Radiation: How Safe is Safe?, IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 9, No. 8, pp. 43-51, August. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 2 12. Tell, R. A. (1973). Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposure: A Preliminary Analysis of the Problem and Continuing Work Within EPA, In Proceedings of a session on Environmental Exposure to Nonionizing Radiation, Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Atlantic City, New Jersey, November 14, 1972. Proceedings issued as EPA Report EPA/ORP 73-2, 136 pages, May [NTIS order no. PB22085I ]. 13. Kinn, J. B. and R. A. Tell (1973). A Liquid -Crystal Contact Lens Device for Measurement of Corneal Temperatures, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. BME-20, No. 5, pp.387-388, September. 14. Rowe, W. D., D. E. Janes, and R. A. Tell (1973). An Assessment of Adverse Health Effects of Telecommunications Technology, In Proceedings of IEEE National Telecommunications Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 9 pages, December 12. 15. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1974). Microwave Hazard Measurements Near Various Aircraft Radars, Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 161-179, April. 16. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1974). RFPulse Spectral Measurements in the Vicinity of Several Air Traffic Control Radars, EPA Technical Report EPA-520/1-74-005, 45 pages, May [NTIS order no. PB235733]. 17. Hankin, N. N., R. A. Tell, and D. E. Janes (1974). Assessing the Potential for Exposure to Hazardous Levels of Microwave Radiation from High Power Sources, Presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society, Houston, Texas, 22 pages, July 7-11. 18. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1974). Calculated Field Intensities Near a High Power UHF Broadcast Installation, Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 401-410, July. 19. Tell, R. A. and N. N. Hankin (1974). Evaluation of the Environmental Microwave Radiation Levels Outside of the Grumman ECM Site, Calverton, New York; August 26- 27, 1974, EPA internal report, 45 pages, September 6. 20. Tell, R. A., J. C. Nelson, and N. N. Hankin (1974). HF Spectral Activity in the Washington, D.C. Area, Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 549-558, September. 21. Athey, T. W., ]R.. A. Tell, and D. E. Janes (1974). The Use of an Automated Population Data Base in Population Exposure Calculations, In Proceedings of Eighth Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society, Knoxville, Tennessee, pp. 29-36, October. a ,. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 3 22. Tell, R. A. (1974). An Investigation of Electrostatic Field Strengths and Associated Phenomena in the Vicinity of an EHV Overhead Power Transmission Line, A study proposal, internal EPA document, 20 pages, November 14. 23. Tell, R. A. (1974). Signal Polarizations in the VHF and UHF Broadcast Spectrum, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. BC-20, No. 4, December. 24. Tell, R. A. (1975). An Analysis of Broadcast Radiation Levels in Hawaii, EPA Technical Note ORP/EAD-75-1, [NTIS order no. PB2613161, 35 pages, August. 25. Tell, R. A. and D. E. Janes (1975). Broadcast Radiation: A Second Look, in Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Waves, ed. By C. C. Johnson and M. L. Shore, Selected papers of the USNC-URSI 1975 annual meeting, Boulder, Colorado, October (2 Volumes), USDHEW Publication (FDA) 77-8011. 26. Tell, R. A. (1976). A Measurement of RF Field Intensities in the Immediate Vicinity of a FM Broadcast Station Antenna, EPA Technical Note ORP/EAD-76-2, 8 pages, January 8 [NTIS order no. PB257698/AS]. 27. Tell, R. A., N. N. Hankin, and D. E. Janes (1976). Aircraft Radar Measurements in the Near Field, In Operational Health Physics, Proceedings of the Ninth Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society, pp. 239-246, February. 28. Hankin,. N. N., R. A. Tell, T. W. Athey, and D. E. Janes (1976). High Power Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation sources: A Study of Relative Environmental Significance, In Operational Health Physics, Proceedings of the ninth Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society, pp. 231-238, February. 29. Tell, R. A., N. N. Hankin, J. C. Nelson, T. W. Athey, and D. E. Janes (1974). An Automated Measurement System for Determining Environmental Radiofrequency Field Intensities II, In Proceedings of NBS symposium on Measurements for the Safe Use of Radiation, March 1-4, 1976, NBS publication NBS SP456 (1976), editor S. P. Fivozinsky, pp. 203-213. Also presented at 1974 Meeting of USNC/URSI, October 14- 17, 1974, Boulder, Colorado. 30. Tell, R. A. (1978). Field Strength Measurements of Microwave Oven Leakage at 915 MHz, presented at Symposium on Microwave Mobile Communications, held September 29-October 1, 1976, at the Institute for Telecommunications Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, and published in IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. EMC-20, No. 2, pp. 341-346, May. 31. Janes, D. E., R. A. Tell, T. W. Athey, and N. N. Hankin (1976). Radiofrequency Radiation Levels in Urban Areas, In Special Supplement on Biology in Radio Sciences, SS-1 (Selected papers of the 1976-USNC-URSI annual meeting, Amherst, Massachusetts, October 1976), pp. 49-56. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 4 32. Tell, R. A. and J. C. Nelson (1976). Broadcast Signal Bandwidth Measurements Using Real -Time Data Averaging, Presented at 24th Annual IEEE Broadcast Symposium, October 14-15, 1974, Washington, DC, and in IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. BC-22, No. 4, pp.116-123, December. 33. Tell, R. A. (1977). An Analysis of Radar Exposure in the San Francisco Area, EPA Technical Note ORP) EAD-77-3, 11 pages, March [NTIS order no. PB273188]. 34. Tell, R. A., J. C. Nelson, D. L. Lambdin, T. W. Athey, N. N. Hankin, and D. E. Janes (1977). An Examination of Electric Fields Under EHV Overhead Power Transmission Lines, EPA Technical Report EPA-502/2-76-008, 39 pages, April [NTIS order no. PB270613]. 35. Tell, R. A. and P. J. O'Brien (1977). An Investigation of Broadcast Radiation Intensities at Mt. Wilson, California, EPA Technical Report ORP-EAD-77-2, 20 pages, April [NTIS order no. PB275040]. 36. Janes, D. E., R. A. Tell, T. W. Athey, and N. N. Hankin (1977). Nonionizing Radiation Exposure in Urban Areas of the United States, In Proceedings, IVth International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, editor, G. Bresson, Vol. 2, pp. 329-332, April. 37. Athey, T. W., R. A. Tell, N. N. Hankin, D. L. Lambdin, E. D. Mantiply, and D. E. Janes (1978). Radiofrequency Radiation Levels and Population Exposure in Urban Areas of the Eastern United States, EPA Technical Note EPA 520/2-77-008, May. 38. Tell, R. A. and N. N. Hankin (1978). Measurements of Radiofrequency Field Intensities in Buildings with Close Proximity to Broadcast Stations, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-3, March. 39. Tell, R. A. (1978). An Analysis of Radiofrequency and Microwave Absorption Data with Consideration of Thermal Safety Standards, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-2, [NTIS order no. PB284639], 45 pages, April. 40. Tell, R. A., D. L. Lambdin, and E. D. Mantiply (1978). Hospital Proximities to Nearby Broadcast Stations, in Proceedings of 1978 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, June 20-22, 1978, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 100-105, IEEE publication 78-CH-1304-5, EMC. 41. Tell, R. A. (1978). Near -field Radiation Properties of Simple Linear Antennas with Applications to Radiofrequency Hazards and Broadcasting, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-4, 39 pages, June. 4 Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 5 42. Tell, R. A. and E. D. Mantiply (1978). Population Exposure to VHF and UHF Broadcast Radiation in the United States, EPA Technical Report ORP/EAD 78-5, [NTIS order no. PB284637], 29 pages, June 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp.6-12, 1980. 43. Tell, R. A. and F. Harlen (1979). A Review of Selected Biological Effects and Dosimetric Data Useful for Development of Radiofrequency Safety Standards for Human Exposure, Journal of Microwave Power, Vol. 14, No. 4. 44. Tell, R. A., E. I). Mantiply, C. H. Durney, and H. Massoudi (1979). Electric and Magnetic Field Intensities and Associated Induced Currents in Man in Close Proximity to a 50 kW AM Standard Broadcast Station, in Program and Abstracts, United States National Committee, International Union of Radio Science, and Bioelectromagnetics Symposium, June 18-22, Seattle, Washington, p. 360. Unpublished manuscript. 45. Tell, R. A., D. L. Lambdin, R. E. Brown, and E. D. Mantiply (1979). Electric Field Strengths in the Near Vicinity of FM Radio Broadcast Antennas, presented at 1979 IEEE Broadcast Symposium, September 20-21, 1979, Washington, DC. 46. Tell, R. A. (1982). Radiofrequency Measurements Workshop Summary, EPA Report 520/2-82-010, 14 pages [NTIS order no. PB115428]. 47. Tell, R. A. (1983). Instrumentation for Measurement of Electromagnetic Fields; Equipment, Calibrations and Selected Applications. In Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Nonionizing Radiation, (editors M. Grandolfo, S. Michaelson, and A. Rindi), NATO Advanced Study Institute Series, Series A: Life Sciences, Volume 49. Plenum Publishing Company. 48. Tell, R. A. and E. Berman (1984). Summary Report on Visit to Departamento de Investigacion, Centro Ramon Y Cajal, Madrid, Spain, EPA report, October. 49. Gailey, P. C. and R. A. Tell (1985). An Engineering Assessment of the Potential Impact of Federal Radiation Protection Guidance on the AM, FM, and TV Broadcast Services, EPA report EPA 520/6-85-011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada April [NTIS order no. PB85-245868]. 50. Tell, R. A. (1986). Real-time Data Averaging for Determining Human RF Exposure, in Proceedings 40th Annual Broadcast Engineering Conference, National Association of Broadcasters, Dallas, Texas, April 12-16, pp. 388-394. 51. Tell, R. A., F. P. Wagner, E. D. Mantiply and R. F. Cleveland (1987). Environmental Surveys of Radiofrequency Radiation from Broadcast Transmitters. Paper P-A28, Ninth Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 21-25, 1987, Portland, OR, p. 56. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 6 52. P. Wagner, E. Mantiply and R. A. Tell (1988). Measurement of Radiofrequency Radiation and Induced Body Currents Due to Broadcast Transmitters. Paper PW-03, Tenth Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 19-23, 1988, Stamford, CT, p.81. 53. N. Kuster and R. A. Tell (1989). A Dosimetric Assessment of the Significance of High Intensity RF Field Exposure Resulting from Reradiating Structures. Paper D-1-5, Eleventh Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 18-22, 1989, Tucson, AZ, p.24. 54. Tell, R. A. (1989). An Investigation of RF Induced Hot Spots and their Significance Relative to Determining Compliance with the ANSI Radiofrequency Protection Guide. Technical report prepared for the National Association of Broadcasters, 1771 N Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, July 3, 145 pages. 55. Tell, R. A. (1989). Electric and Magnetic Fields and Contact Currents Near AM Standard Broadcast Radio Stations. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communications * Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, August 23, 88 pages [NTIS order no. PB89-234850]. 56. Tell, R. A. (1990). RF hot spot fields: the problem of determining compliance with the ANSI radiofrequency protection guide. In 44th Annual Broadcast Engineering Conference Proceedings, National Association of Broadcasters Engineering Conference, March 30-April 3, 1990, Atlanta, GA, pp. 419-431. 57. R. F. Cleveland, E. D. Mantiply and R. A. Tell (1990). A Model for Predicting Induced Body Current in Workers Climbing AM Broadcast Towers. Paper P-7, Twelfth Annual Meeting Abstracts, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, June 10-14, 1990, San Antonio, TX, p. 77. 58. Tell, R. A. (1990). An Investigation of Electric and Magnetic Fields and Operator Exposure Produced by VDTs: NIOSH VDT Epidemiology Study. Technical report prepared for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Industrywide Studies Branch, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH 45226 [NTIS order no. PB- 91-130500]. 59. R. Kavet and R. A. Tell (1991). VDTs: Field levels, epidemiology, and laboratory studies. Health Physics, Vol. 61, No. 1, July,, pp. 47-57. 60. Tell, R. A. (1991). Induced Body Currents and Hot AM Tower Climbing: Assessing Human Exposure in .Relation to the ANSI Radiofrequency Protection Guide. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communcations Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, FCC/OET RTA 91-01 [NTIS order no. PB92-125186]. Publications of Richard A. Tell, page 7 61. Tell, R. A. (1993). RF Current Reduction Provided by Work Gloves at AM Radio Broadcast Frequencies. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communcations Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, FCC/OET RTA 93-01 [NTIS order no. PB94-117041]. 62. Tell, R. A. (1995). Engineering Services for Measurement and Analysis of Radiofrequency (RF) Fields. Technical report prepared for the Federal Communcations Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, FCC/OET RTA 95-01 [NTIS order no. PB95-253829]. NTIS is the National Technical Information Service 1-800-553-6847 N N C U U J r O °) E E � z CL o o M o a N N •- O Z' 2 Q W m , co x U O 0 x lid W m U.o O IO Go M Y� e- X 3 Z Fes. g 0 0 09 Q W 9 Z U3 O® 0 0 0 N _ E CO N O� r V M N M N U) O m v z (X w E tOD v V) W ao © �n co NN Z g tu 'Q o ►� M ao vi O e Za O E y OOOON 0 0 0 0 N O y z cc c� LLt � ..J W z z � O W d V-co.-V-00 `q ce Q r• r (n w cc N O ►r�yy r..� � aO W O z lu N W . Yn M Cl, F- tU a LL V N N N O o Q C N Q Z Z M Q b~ N M 1_7 c) (~7 (D N cn a z a Q W Q F— <L J _ Z Z — �r F-ujjrZ LU Z F- es3 O J ?: O N r- st N M e- to O) M CO O m z V, n .. Z a o: L D7 r at vo t N ^ W N Q In S N N N N N T O r of (D O r () W W z m m O O tt) N P z Q O In ti Z .� W cr- M v U) M � (O to LI) e v (o-� I m (n rNz ".3 (n :E Q rir (D (D v(c.- I' r ao v o�0 a000 L. Q Z W W M Z L� 0 m Z In .. O O O O O y o C 0 0 0 dW N W r0 ') (OD w cd Or- r- LU m ar a it LL a� 0 a. C. = N O 'D N C (D 0 C E O E a. X n. fp t0 F O C) �a O Ifl m u) ca fA in A C � O Q:3 C U O h a. P O O O I N N g ... I to tt') � ., �1� .''_'• � �:�}•• Ij Uto III I 1IM11 mlarliall"14 1 IIIHNNi/111t1�IXF1111111111NNN11Iti o1 >N I I g •icy'' ��— ;�•�;`. .• M .•'ice• •�• ..j. _ �•�� ,�. 'e-1f�� M 1�Ma+�R1�FIlti11F1lIItIHtItI1H�11111iH11 ® � � _ ,,.y to d (• •�'�.�• ,• � •` : � : ppr- 18I N N PSI 3 C9 0 �• o LL- W M _. I N N N I m 7 • p b O O O 0 N N •p, a!O AM YaW®i� 6e �>z P, A �yUa xQ m .0 q N Di iv O in 00 .i Rl m 0 m 0 QM o In f^J .ImO 414a•y®to: q5 9 Coll 1. 0040 u 41 x • d Q mlaM!!Nalr rr nMn.ilnam0109a! llrvin1blainMlomlm1NNor a r b! N O .i Mft b ! eP 0 M! enm .i ! M .•I m b! N 0 .i M! b P a 0 .i N N H •i •i •i '+ .i I I 1 1 1 1 .+ .i N N .i N N .+ .i 1 1 1 1 1 .i I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0000000000000000000000C!C! C!00000000000000 rinM.i0irinM.iarinfn 0%r-inM.lairin M.Iatr-mm alPlnM.�atrM in.4cnrui .1 NMM vT hbr r m as H N M l N N b P m a a 0.4N MMl IA br rmdh c""NM .i .i.i.I.i.i.i.i .i .i.i .i .1 NNN N N N N N N N N N MMM M M m NOM eft Y9l .ib 000! W! rb NOM Mbr lNa 4! 0! Y!Nm W! V!r l.i ar M MMN.iOamblMO.iMlYtbrO!!b aObb.im bN.1.•IN ^"i��H•'i •i 11 1 1 1 1 .i .iN N.iN N.i .i 1 1 1 1 1 ..4.l 4 NONlbr 4.4 I l i t l l l l l .............. .................. ............ ............ .. .... ...... .... .. ...... .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . b! N O. m. b. ! N O. m. b!. . O m. b! N O. m. b. ! N O. m b. N. O. m. b. !. . O. m b. ! N O m. 1. . ! .iNMMlYtbrrma0.�.•iNMlln IfibPmaaO.iN MMllnbPrma O.•1 .�NM .i.i N N N N N N N N N NNNNMMMM m lnHlbbNMm.iNNOmMM.i lnm PNm NNNInOM mlNmOb MON a0amb M M M N.iOambNM.•i ./N!M bra.4N aON bP.iabMM O.iNlbr m00.4 .i •i •4 •� •4 •i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .i N N .� N .1 .4 1 1 1 1 1 .4 .i .4 .� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OOOci0o000o0cc00oc000n00c000000000000000000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eftM.Ia rYtM.iarin M.iarutM.ia r In r; a; PMM.i ar M F; aPMM.iar NM .i N N M! N b b P m at 0 0 .•I N M!! M b r m m at 0 .i N N M! M b b r m a 0 0 .i N M ".i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.4. "NNN NNNNNN NNN MMMMtn mbNMmmPlOMNNmN.idON.i!!a.iamalbOPM.im!.imIrmmlPM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rlin fnM"0a0PMM.i0N l N b r m M d m m m M m.i m r m m" O N/hr m a 2"m 1 1 1 1 1 1 .' NN.li.liN.+.+ t l t l l .i.i.+ 000an0000000000000000000000000000000000000 ! tV O m b! fV O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N .INNM!Ytbbrma00"NM!!Inbr. mom O"NNM W NbbPmm00"NM .i.i.iAo .i".•I.I.i.l.l .iNNNNNNNNNNNNMMMMM M MMri Oa m P In M.i O NM l b r m Mama a l O N a P In M.•i O N Mlnr maC; - rN .i .1 .i .� .+ .i I t 1 1 1 I 1 .+ .i N .� .+ N N .•1 1 1 1 1 1 H .� .1 I I I I I I I I .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V. . . . . . . C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M.iar W;1 i a r M M.•I a r M Mt.ia P N M.1 a P M C. 0; P In M.•la r M M.ia r MM.i ".4 N M! N m b P m m m 0" N M M! M b P r m a 0 .� .i N M! h In b P m m m 0" N M .i.i.i.r.i.i.d.i.d.i.i .INNNNNNNNNNHNNMMMM m P Mr 000 mM 0! 1.in ibPinM NYtNlmMPaa!b C! PMar!Olb1! 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M MMNN.iOmrlfllNO NMlbrm Nmmaal.�MOrbtl./O.i MlnPmaO.iN �+ �+ •� •i •+ •i •+ I I 1 1 1 1 1 .i .i N .i .i N N .i .+ 1 1 I I .i .+ .� I t i l i l l l l .. ...... ............ ...... .... .. ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .... O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O. m b. ! N O. m. b! N O. m b. ! N O Q. b. ! N O. m b. ! N o. m. b. ! N O. m. b! N O m b! N O .1 .i N M l In N b r m m at 0 .•i N M M l N b r P to a 0"" N M! In N 0110, Pm a a a .4 N M .i.i .4.4.4 i r4""".4"NNN NNN NNN NNNNMMMM m rMm.d.i.iautOMMOaMbO101Om. a. InONM b O.iM a. .iblN mNllnlN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MMMNNriOm r b l N O.i Mlb 1- m aalNla mbl.l 0 .i Mtnb 0m0.4m .i 1 1 I I 1 i .d .•i N .i .i N N .i .i 1 1 1 I .4.4 .� I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .�of r: c . r`MM.i aI P m; r; r� M M.1 a1 I` In M.•1 a1 r u1 v; PIn* P . al r In M .�a1 .i N M!lm wPmma O.4N N M l N b b r m a O o" N M!! N b Pm ma0"NN .i.l.l.i.i.4.i.l.i.i .i .i NNN NNN NNNNNN NMM in on 'CI' aPlaNMN.i r N m M N r N b b.i a at m M O MH b m O M N b m" In NOb.iMl on .1 IO M M M N iV .iOa rbl ri C; Ml Utr PO U1b Oa; W;C i mb! N O.i M Utb ma O.iN t9 •+ .4 •+ •+ " .i •+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 .i .i N N .+ N N .i .+ I I 1 1 1 .+ .i .+ 1 I i l l l i l l l W p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MI O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m b! N O m •.I .1NM!lhbrmma0.•1N NMlNbbPma00.iNM!lMbPmmaO.iNN 14 .i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.•i.i.•i NNN NNNNNN NNN NMM MM al j N M M a .. t al to w O O O N N C OI V O V�r 8 A>1 in MT W N W UIOInNW OMO.iO Ulbbn W Nb000Ul .ih 0lh Ul lnnNO.i .i UI UlN OfO MMM Nei 0 T 01 N Ul O Vb Oln n Ul Ul.i0 W V MNV NOW TT V V W W TOI000 W h.i �� NNNNNN'INNNMN.�.-I ./.i .i .i 1 I I r1 1 r� I v1 v1 r1 .�NMNNN�.�N I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. .... .. .. .... ...... ...... .... .. ...... .... .. ...... .... .. .. .... .. .... ...... .. .... .... 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V UI UI T.UI V VMNei000I WhbbUl V MNN.1 i .�NNM V U1bbT W Of OO.�NM M M M rr .i ei ei a ei . N N W W IV 0111 O O M n UI.i O.i N UI M O.i VUIO UIM W OI VN./WM W OOI.i 10N W UIh MO MMM W TOIO bOIb OUI W M WhUIOONOTT.iN W.iV InW W NOnuI UI W .i0 W h0 .1 el .i rl .i eiN Nei eiNNN MNvi .IN.I .iN 1 I I .� I .iN 1 .i eiN.INMN NN.i .iN ...... ........ ............ ............ ........................ ...... ...... ...... .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NO W M UI h 6%.4 M Ul T m d M UI h 01ei M N T 0; .iM UI Mel 0. T W; 0; 0; n UI M.i 01TM P1 .i VUI UI T WUI �! VMN.i000IWh W W lIl VMNN.i I ei eiNMVUIN W hW TaOr+NM MMM .li.i..i.li. .I d i . 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .i ei ei ei Nb ..W.NpThNNUI .iN N n.NO WO.W Cilia! UW..iM V eiM W.W.UO. UI.iN 9UIN.W U MMM WOW W NWT01V OI eiW W VNOU100 W.i00MNO.0 Ul .IOTM.iW 0001h0 ei.i .i "Nei.IN.i""NNMN.i.i N.i.i N.i.i I .i vl i .i ei.i.i.IN"CIMN NNei eiN I I I 1 1 I If 1 IIIIIIIIIII I l l l l l l l l l l l l It O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 919 O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 .i OI T V W W O N qv co O N V W co O N V W W O N V W N O W W V N O W b V N O W W V N 0 V VUl TWUI m V MN.ieiOm W h nW mVMMN" I .i r♦NMVIn UIb r-mm OIOaNM M M M 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .i lnW 0! 0!e! 0. .i0N.1 .♦ Ul00 Ul 0 r N W MWOhWUl 01 Ul 0f0 Ul lnhln0 MMM M.i of NW 01 h mw W MOIVWOOMV Nei T NV W.i N M a m h.i IO M O O W hO .i IV N.i N.i .i .i N N N M.1.1Nei N.iei.i 1 .i 1 1 .i.i.I.i.i.iNMMNNd.iN O I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIII 1 fill a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O mW U1 POI.OtU1 l: 01MP 011 0; 0; U1 r� 0; I: UM.iO1f M1 N01 V -W In 1 .iNM V.lNW h W W 01O.iNN M M M .i .i ei .•I .i .i .i .i .i .i 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 si UlT W Oei UI WOIW WMONOOUI ,♦O.iW T MV•O 01 O ln/V 0V W UI T UI .i ei O O.i .dN MMM .i W.i O1 N T.iW VW 01 W OV Ul O W p M MW N W Ul O c O a; O Ol cl ei.l OlhW .i .i rJ .iNM.i N eiN .INNNNNeiN.l M.i .i I I .i 1 I 1 ei .d .i .i ei N M M N IV.i.i ei I O I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. .. .. ........ ............ ...... ...... ...... ............ ...... ...... .. .... ...... .... O O O O Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In h W W co O N qv W W O N .0 0; O. N V W. W. o. N. 46 W O. W. W V. N . W. W. . N O. W. W. . N O. W. M VUI hW WUIVMNNeiO OIW WhWUi V VMN.i I .iNMV VUIb nW W OIO.iNN M M M .i 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t O V h 0mr4a mTMaMM""wMUIeiNV0hN.iN VNM0 W M11 i"0A0mamm m M M M ./OIiWI .I .I NI WI VI WI VI VI Ii MI "I InI aI "I No O1i N1 MOM V Tol T W.i WI O.i W.i MeiO MMMUN Oah./h .ei 1 .../ t l l O o O O p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W V TOI.iMIllha.iMM hO.eiMUlhOI.iMUlT0leihUl MeiahUlM.iOITUIM.ian M V UI h WbUI VMNN.i00.W wr-wmvVMN.i 1 1 .iNMM VYiW hnW QlO.i .iN M M M ei .d .i .i .i I l t l t l l l t l O.Vh W. ei O O. N W. b O UI UN W. h. V O.iO1 T. W. Ui h U.I.i.iW. U)Ul Ul NMM a01n.i MeiW Ul .ib at .iVbWN WOfNMOV V WOUI Vn.ln0�0. 0f In NO10.T W .'i ai .i 1 MNNMNN.iNNNMN ei ei .i .i 1 ei 1 i .i .i 1 .i 1 ei ei .i .iMMN.i ei .l .i 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. .... .............. ...... .... .. ...... ...... ...... ...... .... .. .... .. ...... ...... .... O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h In M W O N V b W O N V W W O N V W W O N V W W O N W V N O W W V N O W W V N O W W M VUl ,om VMMN.iO Of OIW TbUiNVMNei .i 1 eiNMM VNbThW OIO ei .iN M M M si of .i a .i ei r♦ .i .i .a 1 1 I I I I I I I I I i .+ .i .•I .I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 W Mh `' W OOO.i .i.i W.10 Ul W.i W.iM UI M UI N n in -a W W V in en V co O N.i W in a U101 W NC.;M r. 01 W.a 001 M H MV h 011NhInhMM OM M O M V VO WII1n NUl0c . W; C; O Tb .i .1.i •.i 1 N N N M N N.i NN N M N.i.i.i .i ei .i I i 1 .i 1 1 .i 1 ra .iN .iMM NNN.i rI �G aN -.Ui OI.i M IIl n 01.1 M In h m. in U1 h Of.i M Ul T 01.E M UI M.i m P u1M.i 01 TM In.101 T In M Von n h W UI V M M N.1O010.WnWU1U1• on N.i.i I .i NNM VUI0WnW Ma a.4N M M M M ea .i .i .I .i .i .I .I d .l I I I t I I I I I I I t .I .i M M 0 w a 0 Id a 0 M in a I R .4 Q M 0 y I� U 0 M G 1►1 O O O O a v O M 0OA 1,14 f Q1 of 43 a ow O O A A W M m O M W h 0 N N M N A A O O O O O O O 0 m v N 0 vvWmrao OOHOWm W N OO a.1M N N N N N .4 1 1 II 1 1 1 O O O O O O m m v N 0 00 M v W m r h ./"AA AA N OO NOm 00 N N00mAW N N N N M A 000Ooo rWin"ar MVWmmr A.t.r H .t.4 mMN.�hm .�vuoWmm N N N N .1 A 000000 vivavOmm M v W m m h N.+oN1►.! N Wm 00 co at N NM N .4 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 000000 W MAOf hW MVWWmr W OWd.iW OmM.4ar N NNM.i.4 1 1 1 1 1 1 000000 v NO OD my MVWWmT- A .a AAA.4 OON.i QON N NNMN.i 0 0 0 0 0 0 mAmr-uiM MvvWmh aaaA14a I ►PI ON ❑ P IK— 385.73' IN a F f � . Ir 1 1 - 1 I I I ..!,� , 1 a 1 •M .••< i . N i I • '•, F--! M 1 #i Z • •� I w I �y- I I I I w 1 PH #3 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CASE NOS.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23773 (PHASES 2-7) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-589 REQUESTS: (1) APPROVAL OF THE SUBDIVISION OF 28.4-ACRES INTO 101 SINGLE FAMILY AND OTHER LETTERED PRIVATE STREET LOTS PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND (2) COMPATIBILITY REVIEW OF NEW HOUSE PLANS UNDER CHAPTER 9.60.290 OF THE ZONING CODE LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND ADAMS STREET (ATTACHMENT #1) APPLICANT: STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. (MR. GEORGE C. LANE) PROPERTY OWNER: SAME AS APPLICANT DEVELOPER: DEANE VENTURES (MR. JIM DEANE) ENGINEER: V/S ASSOCIATES (MR. ROBERT C. VATCHER) ARCHITECT: MR. DENNIS C. WOOD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 96-327 HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CERTIFICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL BECAUSE THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. GENERAL PLAN: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ZONING: RL (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) STRTPC.237,12A BACKGROUND: Site Background The Starlight Dunes development is located on the north side of Fred Waring Drive and west of Adams Street. Access to the Tract occurs by using Galaxy Drive on Fred Waring Drive or Adams Street with only right-in/right-out access permitted on Fred Waring Drive. Rick Johnson Construction installed the perimeter street and landscape improvements during development of the existing Phase #1 tract improvements. In 1989, the Planning Commission and City Council approved the subdivision of the 45.6- acre site into 154 single family residential and two common retention basin lots (Tentative Tract Map No. 23773) under Resolution No. 89-36. The Map received three one-year time extensions beginning in 1991. In 1993, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 428 permitting all active tentative maps two additional years without any penalties to the provisions outlined in the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 13) and State Subdivision Map Act. Phase #1 (54-lots on Aurora Way and Skyward Way) of the Tract was recorded and developed in 1989. The unrecorded Tract phases (2-7) expired on March 21, 1996. At this time, forty-seven houses exist within the Tract. The existing houses range in size from 2,084 to 3,332+ square feet (3 and 4 bedrooms) and have two- or three -car garages. The Apollo and Phoenix houses are two-story structures. Previous Tract Condition #24 (Resolution No. 93-22) required 75% of the houses along Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street to be one story (i.e., maximum 20' in height) within 150-feet of the ultimate right-of- way. Surrounding Zoning/Land Use The properties on the east side of Adams Street are in the County of Riverside (Bermuda Dunes Country Club) and either vacant or developed with single family houses. The properties to the north and northwest are in the County and are vacant or developed with either single family houses, a church, and commercial nurseries. To the south and southwest, across Fred Waring Drive, are the established residential developments known as La Quinta Highlands and Las Vistas. The properties to the west are in La Quinta and zoned for residential development. New Application Submittals In July 1996, an application was submitted requesting approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 23773. The original tract number was used to preserve the Tract's continuity and permit the existing owners to use the previously prepared improvement plans. Six construction phases are proposed (101 single family lots) on 28.4-acres. A copy of the man is attached (Attachment #2, Reduced). The applicant proposes no major changes since the City's last STRTPC.237, 1?.A review of the Tract in 1993 under Resolution No. 93-22 (Time Extension #3) except to meet current Code standards. The applicant submitted a Site Development Permit Application for approval of three prototype units within this Tract Phases 2-7 in September. The plan submittal is incomplete. Therefore, Mr. Jim Deane has requested this application be continued to the meeting of October 8, 1996 (Attachment # 3). A thorough discussion of the proposal will be presented then. In summary, the three unit types will vary in size form 2,675 to 3,247 square feet. Public Notice The case was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on September 1, 1996. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. No negative comments have been received. All correspondence received before the meeting will be given to the Planning Commission. Special Note: Site Plan Development Permit No. 96-589 was previously identified as Precise Plan No. 96-861. Public Agency Review Staff mailed a copy of the applicant's request to all public agencies on July 23, 1996, for response by August 5, 1996. All comments have been incorporated into the attached draft Conditions of Approval. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Issue #1 - General Plan/Zoning Code Consistency This site is designated Low Density Residential (2-4 dwellings per acre) in the General Plan. The Zoning Code Update designates this site as RL (Low Density Residential) with a minimum lot size of 7,200 sq. ft. The single family lots are generally 9,000 sq. ft. (90' wide by 100' deep) or larger which is consistent with the RL provisions. No irregularities are evident, and proposed Condition #58 (TTM) requires the applicant to comply with provisions of the RL Zoning Code. Issue #2 - Tract Design/Improvements Galaxy Drive will provide access to the Starlight Dunes development with other streets providing internal access. All interior private streets will be 50-feet in right-of-way width and provide accecs +o al! >ingle family lots. The Cil'y's General Plan requires private cul- de-sac street bulbs to have a curb -to -curb diameter of 90' based on Table 2 of the Circulation Element. The applicant's plans show a 76' diameter curb -to -curb cul-de-sac STRTPC.237,12A bulbs because the plans are based on 1989 requirements. Staff recommends the cul-de- sac widths be modified to be consistent with the General Plan standard (See proposed Condition #32 of TTM). The Conditions of Approval require improvements for this project that include streets and other infrastructure improvements necessary for development pursuant to the Subdivision Ordinance (Title 13) provisions. The recommended Conditions guarantee that all on -site work is consistent with City and other public agency standards. Issue #3 - Health and Safety Concerns The proposed Conditions of Approval require installation of all necessary infrastructure improvements. These include water, sewer, streets, and other necessary improvements. New electric services for each lot will be undergrounded and meet all requirements of the local service agencies (gas, electric, water, etc.). Private septic systems will not be permitted since an off -site sewer line exists within Fred Waring Drive and existing houses to service this area. Plans and fees shall be submitted and paid to the respective serving agency. Issue #4 - Environmental Assessment In 1989, Environmental Assessment No. 88-104 was prepared for Tentative Tract Map No. 23773. The Planning Commission and City Council certified the assessment by adoption of a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures. The Community Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 for this application. A copy is attached (Attachment #4). The City's Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the CRM TECH Cultural Resources Report on September 19, 1996, and concluded that the material presented was acceptable and met City guidelines as to content and format presented. (Minutes from the meeting will be given to the Commission prior to the meeting.) With this information, the Environmental Assessment concludes that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environmental based on implementation of the Conditions of Approval. Staff Comments The applicant has stated to staff that they would like the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the tentative tract map to the City Council so that they can work on their final mapping requirements while they complete their architectural plans. CONCLUSION: Conditions are proposed that comply vvith tl-s er' )ting provisions of the C-neral Plan, Municipal Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance. No physical constraints prevent the STRTPC.237,12A c development of the site as planned. Findings for a recommendation of approval are included in the attached Resolutions. RECOMMENDATIONS: Adopt Resolution No. 96- , recommending to the City Council approval of Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 for Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7); and, 2. Adopt Resolution No. 96- , recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7), subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval as attached; and, 3. Adopt Minute Motion No. 96- , continuing the public hearing for Site Development Permit No. 96-589 to October 8, 1996, to permit the applicant to complete the architectural drawings for the project. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Tract Map Exhibit (Reduced) 3. Letter from Mr. Jim Deane 4. Environmental Assessment (EA #96-327) 5. Large Map Exhibit (PC only) ell, Associate Planner Submitted by: fa Christine di lorio, Plannin0anager STRTPC.237,12A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF- LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 96-327, PREPARED FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23773 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 96-327 STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24th day of September, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 and Tentative Tract Map No. 23773; and, WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA No. 96-327); and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said Tentative Tract Map application will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and that a Negative Declaration of environmental impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly, in that no significant impacts have been identified, and any significant impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance by compliance with City requirements. 2. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, due to the lack of such factors existing�on or near the site. EARES096-327, 12a Planning Commission Resolution 96- 3. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as the site has been previously approved for development as part of an existing residential tract, which was reviewed subject to CEQA and incorporates mitigation measures conditioned upon the initial overall project. 4. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. The proposed residential subdivision is consistent with the designated land use and policy guidance adopted for the La Quinta General Plan, for which mitigation measures were adopted to ensure that future development in accordance with said Plan would not have detrimental effects on the environment beyond those identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted for the La Quinta General Plan. 5. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, in that the site is located on an urbanizing Arterial Corridor, with infrastructure to support such development already in place, and is part of a previously approved residential tract which was originally reviewed subject to CEQA and is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1. That the recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby recommend certification of Environmental Assessment No. 96- 327 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 24th day of September, 1996, by the following vote, to wA: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: EARES096-327, 12a JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23773 (PHASES 2-7) TO ALLOW A 101-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND SALES SUBDIVISION AND MISCELLANEOUS AMENITY LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 28.4-ACRES CASE NO.: TTM No. 23773 (PHASES 2-7) APPLICANT: STARLIGHT ESTATES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24th day of September, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for a 28.4-acre site with 101 single family lots, generally on the north side of Fred Waring Drive and east of Adams Street, more particularly described as: Portion of the S'/z SE% of Section 18, T5S, R7E, SBBM (APN: 609-080-011 and 609-480-020) WHEREAS, said Tentative Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution No. 83-63). The Community Development Department has prepared EA No. 96-327 for this project which states the project will not have a significant impact on the environment based on Conditions; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following Mandatory Findings of approval to justify a recommendation for approval of said Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7): A. The proposed map is consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan and any applicable specific plans. The property is within a Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) District per the provisions of the 1992 General Plan Update. The project density is 3.5 dwellings per acre for Phases 2-7 which is under the maximum level for the LDR District. Tentative Tract No. 23773 (Phases 2-7) is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2) provivad conditions are met. The site is zoned RL (Low Density Residential District) which permits single family development on lots a least 7,200 sq. ft. The proposed lots average 9,000 sq. ft. Future housing shall be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code (e.g., RES0Pc.3oo-4a/cond773a Resolution 96- specifically Chapter 9.30.030 et. seq.) in effect at the time building permits are acquired. B. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and any applicable specific plans. All streets and improvements in the project as conditioned will conform to City standards as outlined in the General Plan and Subdivision Ordinance. All on -site streets will be private (50' wide right-of-way) which is consistent with the Circulation Element (Chapter 3.0). Access to the Tract will be from Galaxy Drive on Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street. The density and design standards for the tract will comply with the Land Use Element (Chapter 2.0) of the General Plan and the Zoning Code. C. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed land division as approved in 1989, and portions of the site were previously graded in anticipation of this development additional phases of Tract Map No. 23773. Mitigation fees and environmental studies (i.e., archaeological and noise) were completed as required prior to development of the project in 1989. A new Cultural Resources Report was required for Tract Phases 2-7 because the original study was more than five years old. The new study states that no known prehistoric sites have been previously recorded on this property, therefore, archaeological monitoring will not be required during site development unless human remains are found during excavation work. This project will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to fish or wildlife, or their habitat because mitigation measures were completed at the time the site was disturbed or will be mitigated based on the proposed Conditions of Approval. D. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision, as conditionally approved, will not cause serious public health problems because they will install urban improvements based on City, State, and Federal requirements. E. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the puolic at large, for access tirough or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed streets are planned to provide direct access to each single family lot. All required public easements will provide access to the site or support necessary REs0rc.3oo-4dcond773a Resolution 96- infrastructure improvements. The original builder provided site access to Tract Phases 2-7. WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Tract Map, the Planning Commission has considered, the effect of the contemplated action on housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of La Quinta and its environs with available fiscal and environmental resources; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case; 2. That it does recommend approval to the City Council of Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Planning Commission, held on this the 24th day of September, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California REsoPc.3oo-4a/cond773a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.23773 - STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL Upon their approval by the City Council, the City Clerk is authorized to file these Conditions of Approval with the Riverside County Recorder for recordation against the properties to which they apply (i.e., Assessor's Parcel Numbers 609-080-011 and 609-480-020). 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 shall comply with the requirements and standards of §§66410- 66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. This map shall expire two years after acceptance by the City Council unless extended pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance (Chapter 13.12.150(B)). 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: - Fire Marshal - Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) - Community Development Department - Riverside County Environmental Health Department - Desert Sands Unified School District - Coachella Valley Water District - Imperial Irrigation District - California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) - Sunline Transit The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. For projects requiring NPDES construction permits, the applicant shall include a copy of the application for the Notice of Intent with grading plans submitted for plan checking. Prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit, the applicant shall submit a copy of an approved Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan. 4. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Initastructure Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. v �f COND.773-12a PROPERTY RIGHTS All easements, rights of way and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary to facilitate the ultimate use of the development and functioning of improvements shall be dedicated, granted or otherwise conferred, or the process of said dedication, granting, or conferral shall be ensured, prior to approval of a final map or filing of a certificate of compliance for waiver of a final map. The conferral shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant easements to the City for access to and maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of all essential improvements which are located on privately -held lots or parcels. With respect to the drainage basin located in the existing Tract No. 23773-1, the conferral shall include the granting of drainage rights for all areas located within the original tentative map and access rights, for the purpose of construction, reconstruction and maintenance of the basin, to the homeowners association(s) for the entire original tentative map area. 6. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties. 7. The applicant shall dedicate three-foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The applicant shall dedicate any easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 9. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the Public Works Director. FINAL MMM 10. As part of the filing package for final map approval, the applicant she furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media and in a program format acceptable to the Public Works Director. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu choices so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. a6l"Zintelm 11. Improvement plans submitted to the City for plan checking shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." All plans except precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for the Public Works Director. Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, gates and entryways, and parking lots. If water and sewer plans are included on the street and drainage plans, the plans shall have an additional signature block for the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). COND.773-12a The combined plans shall be signed by CVWD prior to their submittal for the Public Works Director's signature. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include landscape improvements, irrigation, lighting, and perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the Public Works Director. 12. In lieu of submitting new plans for any element of construction, the subdivider may propose to use existing, approved plans developed for the original tentative map provided the plans comply with existing requirements. 13. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City Resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 14. When final plans are approved by the City, and prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the Public Works Director. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu choices so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions including approved revisions to the plans. NPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 15. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or enter into a secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to agendization of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Title 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 16. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide approved estimates of improvement costs. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the Public Work Director. Estimates for utilities and other improvements under the jurisdiction of outside agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, tract improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 17. Ifthe applicant desires to phase improvements and obligations required by the conditions of approval and secure those phases separately, a phasing plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the Public Works Director. COND.773-12a } The applicant shall complete required improvements and satisfy obligations as set forth in the approved phasing plan. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase unless a construction sequencing plan for that phase is approved by the Public Works Director. 18. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (site development permits, conditional use permits, etc.), off -site improvements and development -wide improvements (ie: retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates, etc.) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first final map unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. 19. The applicant shall pay cash or provide security in guarantee of cash payment for applicant's required share of improvements which have been or will be constructed by others (participatory improvements). Participatory improvements for this development include: A. One half of a raised, landscaped median on Fred Waring Street from Adams Street to the west boundary of Tract No. 23773-1. The applicant's obligations for all or a portion of the participatory improvements may, at the City's option, be satisfied by participation in a major thoroughfare improvement program if this development becomes subject to such a program. ('TRADING 20. Graded, undeveloped land shall be maintained to prevent dust and blowsand nuisances. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 21. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the Applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. In accordance with said Chapter, the Applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 22. The applicant shall comply with the City's flood protection ordinance. 23. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and must meet the approval of the Public Works Director prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report produced for the original tentative map and shall be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the final map(s), if any are required of this development, that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 24. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within this development, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. COND.773-12a If the applicant is unable to comply with the pad elevation differential requirement, the City will consider and may approve alternatives that preserve community acceptance and buyer satisfaction with the proposed development. 25. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a separate document, bearing the seal and signature of a California registered civil engineer or surveyor, that lists actual building pad elevations for the building lots. The document shall list the pad elevation approved on the grading plan, the as -built elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. The data shall be organized by lot number and shall be listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 26. Stormwater falling on the site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm shall be retained in the retention basin located in Tract No. 23773-1. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 27. The applicant shall complete improvements to the retention basin located in Tract No. 23773-1. 28. Fences or walls will not be allowed around the retention basin except as approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. 29. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 30. All existing and proposed utilities within or adjacent to the proposed development shall be installed underground. High -voltage power lines which the power authority will not accept underground are exempt from this requirement. 31. In areas where hardscape surface improvements are planned, underground utilities shall be installed prior to construction of surface improvements. The applicant shall provide certified reports of utility trench compaction tests for approval of the Public Works Director. 32. The following minimum street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the Circulation Element of the General Plan (Chapter 3.0): PRIVATE STREETS AND CUL DE SACS 1) Residential - 36 feet wide if double loaded (buildings on both sides), 32 feet if single loaded. 2) Cul de sac curb radius - 45' 33. Access points and turning movements of traffic shall be limited to those approved for the original tentative tract map. COND.773-12a 34. Improvements shall include all appurtenances such as traffic signs, channelization markings, raised medians if required, street name signs, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters approved in design and location by the U.S. Post Office and the Public Works Director. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 35. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by registered professional engineer(s) authorized to practice in the State of California. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted Standard and Supplemental Drawings and Specifications, and as approved by the Public Works Director. 36. Street right of way geometry for cul-de-sacs, knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #800, #801, and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. 37. All streets proposed to serve residential or other access driveways shall be designed and constructed with curbs and gutters or shall have other approved methods to convey nuisance water without ponding in yard or drive areas and to facilitate street sweeping. 38. Street pavement sections shall be based on a Caltrans design for a 20-year life and shall consider soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including site and building construction traffic). The minimum pavement sections shall be as follows: Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.511/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5"/6.50" The applicant shall submit current (no more than two years old) mix designs for base materials, Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete, including complete mix design lab results, for review and approval by the City. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (no more than six months old) aggregate gradation test results which confirm that the mix design gradations can be reproduced in production of the base or paving material. Construction operations shall not be scheduled until mix designs are approved. 39. Prior to occupancy of homes or other permanent buildings within the development, the applicant shall install all street and sidewalk improvements, tragic control devices and street name signs along access routes to those buildings. 40. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots, landscape setback areas, medians, common retention basins, and park facilities shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Community Development Department. Landscape and irrigation construction plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plans are not approved for construction until they COND.773-12a t ; have been approved and signed by the Public Works Director, the Coachella Valley Water District, and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner. 41. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way. 42. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Public Works Director. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 5-feet of curbs along public streets. 43. Unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director, common basins and park areas shall be designed with a turf grass surface which can be mowed with standard tractor -mounted equipment. 44. The applicant shall ensure that landscaping plans and utility plans are coordinated to provide visual screening of above -ground utility structures. 45. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the Public Works Director. 46. The applicant shall employ or retain California registered civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, or surveyors, as appropriate, who will provide, or have their agents provide, sufficient supervision and verification of the construction to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 47. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all plans which were signed by the Public Works Director. Each sheet of the drawings shall have the words "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" clearly marked on each sheet and be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCad plan files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as - constructed condition. MAINTENANCE 48. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous maintenance of drainage, landscaping and on -site street improvements. 49. The applicant shall pay all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposit and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 50. Parkland fees snail be paid prior to final map approval as required by Chapcer 13.48 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 51. Fringe -Toed Lizard habitat mitigation fees shall be prior to site grading or issuance of a building permit. COND.773-12a �, 52. Two checks made out to the County of Riverside in the amounts of $1,250.00 and $78.00 for the project's environmental assessment (Negative Declaration) shall be submitted to the Community Development Department within 24-hours after review of the map by the City Council. FIRE DEPAI�TMEI�T 53. Schedule A fire protection approved Super fire hydrants (6" X 4" X 2'/2" X 2'/2") will be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330-feet apart in any direction with any portion of any frontage more than 165-feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow will be 1,000 g.p.m. for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi. 54. Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant/developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. Plans will conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system will meet the fire flow requirements. Plans will be approved and signed by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 55. The required water system including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 56. A temporary water supply for fire protection may be allowed for the construction of the model units only. Plans for a temporary water system must be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to issuance of building permits. 57. If human remains or other historical artifacts are found during excavation, no further grading or excavation shall occur until appropriate mitigation measures are completed, as per current State, County and City requirements. The Community Development Department shall be notified if human remains are found. ffui_1-9a ��• The Tract layout shall comply with all the RL Zoning Code requirements (Chapter 9.30.030). 59. The City Attorney shall approve the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC and R's) for the Tract prior to approval of the final map(s) by the City Council. COND.773-12a ATTACHMENTS FOR TTM #23773/SDP#96-589 AT[ACH4.0 I Vicinity Map Case No: TTM 23773 Location: NW corner of Fred Waring Dr. and Adams St. Applicant: Starlight Estates Legal Description: Being a portion of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 5361 STARUGHT LANE SI N Attachment 1 Vin7-c n PHASE 2RACTNO_ LOTS _ Attachment 2 ----- ----- --- ---- 2 23773-2 17 3 23773-3 •7 4 23773-4 20 JN 85-01-00 5 23773-5 24 6 23773-6 20 saru�. 7 23773 13 .3-31-94 101 TOTAL I (NOTE: Adjacent Phases may be.combined) IP H�A SlE 1 1 1 - ( V COR ED)Wc7 ------j-- •-.P_R — �g to G�Co _ OD "9 o - .. rn IV 9 /W �C: a I w I I - PCt�1R1S wAY_ CA ` Co v, C a -nI r Z m ai • &URI Co 1 D iv m L - w PiS=5 P A S E I I I I I WAY Co d / I I 1 I l I I i' .p oN I t I I I I �HYA S . (D p N � w �� / I I (RECORDED " r• p crn `------------ _-- --------- ------------ 0 �+ ADAMS ------ STREZ n � 0 > m N r- N r+ Sep-16-96 08:43A DEANE 714 754 1543 P.01 Jim Deane Community Development Department City of La Quinta Fax (619) 777-7155 Attn: Greg Trousdell Re: Tract 23773 Dear Mr. Trousdell, Attachment 3 September 16, 1996 We hereby request that our tentative map application be heard as scheduled at the Planning Commission Hearing on September 24th. We would Gke to defer the approval of our house plans until the next hearing on October 8, 1996. Sincerely Deane Starlight Estates Inc. ECOVE SEP 16 1996 CITY OF LAQU1NTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O Box 5140 Newport Beach, Ca 92662 (714)754.1517 Fax (714)754-1543 t Attachment 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 Case No.: TT 23773 Date: August 6, 1996 Name of Proponent: Starlight Estates, Inc. Address: 82-050 54th Avenue, Thermal, CA 92274 Phone: 619-398-2075 Agency Requiring Checklist: City of La Quinta Project Name (if applicable): Tentative Tract 23773; _ a portion of a previously approved 154 lot subdivision, comprising 101 lots on 28.4 acres for the remaining unrecorded acreage of the original tract. CITY OF LA QUINTA t Community Development Departm—at 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 cklst.327 II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population and Housing Biological Resources Utilities Earth Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics Water Risk of Upset and Human Health Cultural Resources Air Quality Noise HRecreation Mandatory Findings of Significance IIL DETERNIWATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL MIPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least I) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a `potentially significant impact" or `potential significant unless mitigated". An ENVIRONMENTAL MIPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signature: G✓_ �— Date: August 6, 1996 '"Tinted Name and Title: )'t^ne Nesbit- Associate Planner i i " i.. 11 Potentially Potentially Sipificant Leas Than sigoirlcent unless sipifieant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (source H(s): b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? X c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? 3.2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? X b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? X c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? X 3.3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or • expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? X b) Seismic ground shaking c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X e) Landslides or mudtaows? X fj Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? X g) Subsidence of the land? X Poteouallv poteattally Sigaiftcant Len Than Significant Unless Signifinnt No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact h) Expansive soils? i) Unique geologic or physical features? } 3.4. WATER. Would the project result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runofft b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? I d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? 8 e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? X f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? X g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? X .. h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 7[ 3.5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project. a) Violate any air quality standard, or contribute to any existing or projected air quality violation? X b) Exposesensitive receptors to pollutants? X c) Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? X d1 Create objection! odors? X t rn Potenttafiv Potentially sipificant Lou Than Significant Unless Sipuficaat 40 Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the project result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? X b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? 7 c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? X d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site? X e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? x f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?€ 3.7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? X b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? X c) Locally designated natural communities, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? Iv Poteuuauv PoteutWly Significant Lau T6ao Siptifinat Udeu siv"Icnt NoIm act Mitigated Impact Impact d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 3•8. ENERGY AND MINERAL, RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? 3.9. RISK OF UPSET/EajMAN HEALTH. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, Pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health ' hazards? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fre hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? 3.10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: X X If X X a) Increases in existing noise levels? X b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ X 3.11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect t upon, or result in•a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: ay Fire protection? X v PotrntlallV Poteotully Sign�cau Leas Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X 3.12. UTILITIES. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X b) Comm inications systems? X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? 7 d) Sewer or septic tanks? X e) Storm water drainage? X f) Solid waste disposal? X 3.13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X c) Create light or glare? X 3.14.. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? X b) Disturb archaeological resources? X c) Affect historical resources? X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X Poteaualiv Potenually sigadiicant Less Than Significant Uoleu Significant �o Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? X b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X 4. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining Levels, threaten to eliminate a plate or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plate or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental gam? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "notetui,41ly significant unless mitigated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extern to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. vii 4. INITIAL STUDY - ADDENDUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-327 Prepared for: TENTATIVE TRACT 23773 STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. 82-020 54TH AVENUE THERMAL, CA 92274 Prepared by: Community Development Department City of La Quinta 79-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 August 8,1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview 12 Purpose of Initial Study 1.3 Background of Environmental Review 1.4 Summary of Preliminary Environmental Review 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location and Environmental Setting 2.2 Physical Characteristics 2.3 Operational Characteristics 2.4 Objectives 2.5 Discretionary Actions 2.6 Related Projects 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 3.1, Land Use and Planning 3.2 Population and Housing 3.3 Earth Resources 3.4 Water 3.5 Air Quality 3.6 Transportation/Circulation 3.7 Biological Resources 3.8 Energy and Mineral Resources 3.9 Risk of Upset/Human Health 3.10 Noise 3.11 Public Services 3.12 Utilities 3.13 Aesthetics 3.14 Cultural Resources 3.15 Recreation 4 V'[AANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 5 EARLIER ANALYSIS Page 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 Mi 5 5 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 2 6101 ► Wo0'Z 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 3 The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency for project review, as defined by Section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Lead Agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project as defined by CEQA. The City of La Quinta, as the Lead Agency, has the authority to oversee the environmental review and to approve the project. 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE D TTIAL STUDY As part of the environmental review for the proposed project, the City of La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared this Initial Study. This document provides a basis for determining the nature and scope of the subsequent environmental review for the project. The purposes of the Initial Study, as stated in Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, include the following: To provide the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) or a negative declaration for a project; To enable the applicant or the City of La Quinta to modify the project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact; To assist in the preparation of an EIR, should one be required, by focusing the analysis on those issues that will be adversely impacted by the proposed project; To facilitate environmental review early in the design of the project; To provide documentation for the findings in a negative declaration that the project will not have a •• significant effect on the environment; To eliminate unnecessary EIR's; and To determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. 1.3 BACKGROUND OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was deemed subject to the environmental review requirements of CEQA in light of changes in the surrounding area since the original approval of Tentative Tract 23773 in March, 1989. The Environmental Officer &- :he Community Development Department has prepared tl is h iti d Stu.:, and addendum for review and certification by the Planning Commission and City Council for the City of La Quinta prior to approval of the proposed project. 4 1.4 SUI 04ARY OF PRELE IINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This initial Study did not indicate potential for significant environmental impacts. As a result, no project -specific mitigation measures are recommended, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be recommended for this proposal. General mitigation routinely as required by the City for most projects are referenced in this addendum. Any changes made by the applicant to the project as a result of this assessment, design review or other reason, which would necessitate changes to this addendum, are shown in italics as part of this document in the issue area which any such changes may affect. 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City of La Quinta is a 31.18 square mile municipality located in the southwesterly portion of the Coachella Valley. The City is bounded on the west by the City of Indian Wells, on the east by the City of Indio and Riverside County, on the north by Riverside County, and federal and county lands to the south. The City of La Quinta was incorporated on May 1,1982. The subject site consists of approximately 28 acres located on the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street. The site is a portion of a previously subdivided 45 acre, 154 lot tract which expired in March, 1996 with only the initial phase (53 lots) having been recorded in July, 1989. The unrecorded areas for which this project is submitted are vacant and predominantly undisturbed. Small areas in the northeasterly portion of the site, which were designated for retention area, have been previously disturbed due to development of the initial phase due to use w storage for construction materials/equipment, etc. 2.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The proposal involves resubdividing the remaining 28 acres of the original tract 23773 under the same tract number. Currently there are 47 existing units, which were completed in 1989 and 1990. 2.3 OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS • The tract is currently developed with a portion of the street system to serve the existing residential units. The streets are private and the project incorporates two existing gated entries. No change to the concept or scale and scope of the original project is proposed with the refiled map. 2.4 OBJECTIVES The objective of the tract map is to complete the existing project in substantial conformance with the original approval for tract 23773. 2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS A discretionary action is an action taken by a government agency (for this project, the government agency is the City of La Quinta ) that calls for the exercise of judgment in deciding whether to approve or carry out a project. I�`4 The proposed project will require discretionary approval from the Planning Commission and City Council for the following: Certification of the Environmental Assessment for the project; Recommendation and Approval of the Tentative Tract Application. 2.6 RELATED PROJECTS There are no related projects to this proposal under review at present. This section analyzes potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed tract map. CEQA issue areas are evaluated in this addendum as contained in the Initial Study Checklist. Under each checklist item, the environmental setting is discussed, including a description of conditions as they presently exist within the City and the areas affected by the proposed project. Thresholds for significance are defined either by standards adopted by responsible or trustee agencies or by referring to criteria in CEQA, Appendix G. 3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, in the eastern portion of Riverside County. The valley is abundant with both plant and animal life. Topographical relief ranges from 237 feet below mean sea level (msl) to about 2,000 feet above msl. The valley is surrounded by the San Jacinto Mountains, the Santa Rosa Mountains, the Omcopia Mountains, and the San Bernardino Mountain range. The San Andreas fault transects the northeastern edge of the valley. Local Environmental Setting The subject site is primarily undisturbed. There are 47 residential units established within the site, which was being built out on a market demand basis. The residential uses are consistent with the General Plan and zoning currently in effect. The City has recently adopted a revised zoning code effective September S, 1996. The • • surrounding Riverside County land use designations on the north and east are Residential 2B (2-5 units/acre), consistent with La Quinta designations for the site and properties to the south and west at Low Density Residential (2-4 units/acre). A through D - No Impact The tract map does not propose uses inconsistent with the currently existing or future land uses contemplated for the project area. The revised zoning code allows a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet; previous zoning on the property required minimum lot sizes of 9,000 square feet. The tract map submitted incorporates the previous improvement provisions and lot sizes from the past approval; no changes are proposed which would result in any significant impacts. 3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSL :G Regional Environmental Setting The City's population as of January, 1996, is estimated by the State Department of Finance to be 18,046 persons. In addition to permanent residents, the City has approximately 9,300 seasonal residents who spend three to six 0 months in the City. It is estimated that 30% of all housing units in the City are used by seasonal residents. The average occupancy is 2.85 persons per occupied unit (1990 Census; 1996 State Dept of Finance). Local Environmental Setting The immediate area is designated for Low Density Residential (LDR) on the General Plan Land Use Policy Diagram. The surrounding area to the north and east is under Riverside County jurisdiction and designated for residential at a similar density. A through C - No Impact, The proposed tract will not affect the area development patterns or population distribution, and will therefore not affect any significant population increase or area growth. The proposed residential uses are consistent with those which at one time were approved and now partially established for the site. 3.3 EARTH RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta has a varied topography, fmm gently sloping alluvial fans, steep hillsides, to relatively flat desert floor. The alluvial soils that make up most of the City's soil types are underlain by igneous -metamorphic rock, as seen in outcrops in the Santa Rosa Mountains and the Coral reef Mountains. Soils on the valley floor are made up of very fine grain unconsolidated silty sands. Local Environmental Setting Portions of the site were disturbed due to use for temporary construction purposes during development of the initial tract phase. Most of the site is undisturbed, with a rolling topography and sandy dune features. Soils on the site consist of the Myoma series, characterized by rapid permeability. A, C through I - No Impact The proposed project will not present any significant impacts pertaining to these issue areas. Seismic or other ground rupture is not considered to be a significant hazard due to the absence of active faults in the City. The site and surrounding area is not identified as being subject to liquefaction. No potential for seiche or tsunami exists in the desert, and volcanic activity is not applicable to this region. The site has no significant relief features and is therefore not subject to landslide or mudflows. No impacts due to soil instability are anticipated beyond those commonly associated with and mitigated during construction activity. .. Land subsidence and expansive soil impacts are not seen as significant due to the physical nature of underlying granitic and metamorphic geology and sand soil units. No unique geologic or physical features exist on or surrounding the site (LQMEA; Site survey). The project will be required to file and receive approval of grading plans prior to any construction commencing on -site. B - Less Than Significant Impact The site is located in an area identified on the Environmental Hazards map in the LQMEA as being in a Ground shaking Zone TV, subject to moderate seismic shake impacts, although throughout the City there is no significant hazard due to the absence of known active faulting within the City (LQMEA). Irregardless, some degree of Ground shaking will occur with seismic activity. The City requires all new construction to comply with the UBC standards for seismic resistance and the State Strong Motion Impact Program (SNIP). 3.4 WATER Regional Environmental Setting Groundwater resources in the La Quinta area consist of a system of large aquifers (porous layer of rock material) and groundwater basins separated by bedrock or layers of soil that trap or retain groundwater. Water supplies are also augmented with surface water from the Colorado River transported via the Coachella Canal and stored at Lake Cahuilla. Percolation from the tributaries of the Whitewater River flowing into La Quinta from the Santa Rosa Mountains provide a natural source of groundwater replenishment. Artificial recharging of groundwater will be a requirement in the near future. Local Environmental Setting The vicinity of the project is generally unprotected from design storms by any flood control or other improvements. The site is slightly raised and level, sloping to Washington Street to achieve drainage. The site does not appear to be subject to flooding. A - Less Than Significant Impact Current runoff rates will be incrementally increased due to the additional site area being developed, such as for additional paving, hardscape and landscaping, and therefore surface runoff will increase. This impact will not be significant as the original project approval included provisions for retention area to accommodate storm and nuisance water flows. The current developer will be required to adhere to these original provisions or provide an acceptable alternative. B Through H - No Impact Development of the site will not expose people or property to flooding impacts or other water -related hazards. Surface waters and streams will not be affected, and ground water resource quantity and quality will not be impacted, as the site is not proximate to any water bodies or features, significant or otherwise (Site survey). 3.5 AIR QUALITY Regional Environmental Setting The Coachella Valley is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and is located in the Southeast Desert Air Basin (SEDAB). SEDAB has a distinctly different air pollution problem than the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). A discussion of the jurisdictional organization and requirements is found in the LQMEA. Currently, the SEDAB does not meet federal standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter. In the Coachella Valley, the standards for PM 10 are frequently exceeded. PM 10 is particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter that becomes suspended in the air due to winds, grading activity, and by vehicles on unpaved roads, among other causes. Local Environmental Setting The City is located in the Coachella Valley, which has an and climate, characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent and low annual rainfall, and low humidity. Variations in rainfall, temperatures, and localized .finds occur throughout the valley . ue to the presence of the surrounding mountains. Air quauity conc. tions are closely tied to the prevailing winds of the region. A - Less Than Significant Impact No significant contributions to existing air quality violations are foreseen based on established thresholds. The proposed project incorporates 101 new residential units, which had already 8 been contemplated for the site in the 1992 General Plan Update. The 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Handbook indicates a significance threshold for air quality impacts in the Residential, Single Family Housing category as being at 166 units. The project's primary air quality impact will occur from construction (short-term) PM10 emissions The Coachella Valley area is currently non -attainment for PM10. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan (FRCP) will be required prior to project grading pernrit approval(s), in accordance with Chapter 6.16 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. B, C, D - No Impact The proposed subdivision is entirely surrounded by other similar residential uses, and will not be a source of emissions which could affect such uses or my other sensitive receptor. It is not anticipated that the project will create any objectionable odors. No manufacturing or processing activities are proposed which could be a source of any odors. The project is not of a scale such that it will create any climatic changes. 3.6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Regional Environmental Setting The existing circulation system is a combination of early roadwork constructed by Riverside County and new roadways since incagx ration of the City in 1982. Key area roadways include State Highway 111, Washington Street, Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive. Traffic volumes in La Quinta experience considerable seasonal variation, with the late -winter, early spring months representing the peak tourist season and highest traffic volumes. Local Environmental Setting The project is located along the north side of Fred Waring Drive. Some development of on -site roadways, parking and driveways already exists. Fred Waring is fully improved along the project frontage. A - Less Than Significant Impact. No significant traffic increases are anticipated due to the proposal. The project will generate approximately 1,017 daily trips (1987 ITE, 4th Ed.) on a typical weekday, based on 101 single fancily lots. This will not significantly impact the capacity of Fred Waring Drive, which is currently operating at an A -rated Level of Service (LOS) based on mid -block operational capacity. B Through G - No Impact. The project design does not appear to create any safety hazards due to its layout, .. or any use that is not compatible with surrounding land uses. The project design will not affect access to other properties nor will it result in inadequate emergency access. The project will provide adequate on -site parking for the proposed residential units, as well as on -street parking availability. No increased hazards to pedestrians or bicyclists are associated with the proposed- project. No conflicts with any existing adopted alternative transportation policies are anticipated. 3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta lies within the Colorado Desert. Two ecosystems are found within the City; the Sonoran Desert Scrub and the Desert Transition. The disturbed environments within the City are classified as urban or agricultural. A discussion of these ecosystems is found in the LQMEA. Wo Local Environmental Setting The subject area is partially developed with 47 existing residential units. The LQMEA identifies the site as within the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard habitat mitigation fee area, for which a federal l0A permit was obtained pursuant to adoption of the CVFTL Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The Flat -Tailed Horned Lizard is a candidate species identified for federal endangered status, whose range extends into the project area. No mitigation procedures are in place for this species. A region -wide effort is underway to develop a Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), coordinated by CVAG and the BLM. A through E - No Impact The site has been partially disturbed and is partly developed with residential structures and paved areas. There is minimal potential for any wildlife habitat to exist on the site. Fees were paid in conjunction with development of the initial phase of the tract in 1989. Any outstanding mitigation fees will be required to be paid for the CVFTL as part of any grading permits issued for the site. 3.8 ENERGY AND MT(ERAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta contains both areas of insignificant and Significant Mineral Aggregate Resources Areas (SMARA), as designated by the State Department of Conservation. There are no known oil resources in the City. Major energy resources used in the City come from the Imperial Irrigation District (iID), Southern California Gas Company, and gasoline companies. Local Environmental Setting The site does not he within an identified area sensitive to mineral resources. Soils within the site consist of Myoma fine sand; these soils are well -drained and permeable. A, B - No Impact The proposed tract has no potential to impact energy or mineral resources in any manner, as no such resources are identified as existing on or near the site and the uses proposed do not utilize such resources to any significant degree. 3.9 RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH Regional Environmental Setting Although large scale, hazardous waste generating employment is not yet located within La Quinta, the existence of chemicals utilized in dry cleaning operations, agricultural operations, restaurant kitchen cleaning, landscape irrigation and exposure to large scale electrical facilities may pose significant threats to various sectors of the population. Currently, there are no hazardous disposal waste sites located in Riverside County, transportation of such materials out of and through La Quinta takes place. Local Environmental Setting The project site has not been, nor will it be used for any type of manufacturing. There are no uses proposed which would require substantial amounts of chemicals, or other hazardous materials or processes. A through E - No Impact There is no potential Zor additional i...k or health hazard due to the rc:.iuest, or any effect on emergency response or potential fire hazard. Development of the project will be subject to Riverside County Fire standards as in effect and applicable at the time. i, � 10 3.10 NOISE Regional Environmental Setting Noise levels in the City are created by a variety of sources in and near the City. The major sources include vehicular noise on City streets and Highway 111, and temporary construction noises. The ambient noise levels are dominated by vehicular noise along the highway and major arterials. Local Environmental Setting Primary noise sources in the subject area are associated with vehicle traffic along Fred Waring Drive, and various short-term noise sources associated with urbanized residential uses. A - Less Than Significant Impact. There will be some negligible increase in noise levels due to the proposal, associated with additional traffic on -site. It is not anticipated that the residential units will constitute a significant increase in noise levels, based on the nature of the use as a sensitive noise receptor. Development of the project will have negligible effects upon noise levels or exposure to noise when considered with existing traffic patterns on Fred Waring and existing sound attenuation (wall) improvements. B - No Impact Development and operation of the project will not create any severe noise levels. Short term -construction noise impacts will be minimal in light of the existing traffic conditions on Fred Waring. Construction activities will be limited to hours as set forth in the La Quinta Municipal Code. 3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES Regional Environmental Setting Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contract with the Riverside County Sheriff s Department. Fire protection service is provided to the City by Riverside County Fire Department. The Fire Department administers two stations in the City; Station #32 on Frances Hack Lane, and Station #70, at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54. Paramedic services are provided by Springs Ambulance Service. Health care services are provided in the City through JFK Memorial Hospital in Indio, and the Eisenhower Immediate Care Clinic located in the One -Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. •• Local Environmental Setting The nearest fire station to the area is Station #32 located approximately four miles south of the subject area Governmental services in La Quinta are provided by City staff at the Civic Center. A through E - No Impact The proposal will have negligible impacts to public services. The existing approved development pattern for the area will not be altered by the development of the proposed tract, as the design is the same as that approved for the site in 1989. The project will not generate significant additional student populations, and will have a negligible impact on police and fire protection. 3.12 UITLPTIES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is served by the Imperial Irrigation District (UD) for electrical power supply and the Southern California Gas Company (SCG) for natural gas service. General Telephone Exchange (GTE) provides telephone services for the City. Continental Cablevision services the area for cable television service. te,. 11 The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides water and sewer service to the City. CVWD obtains its water from underground aquifers and from the Colorado River. The City's storm water drainage system is administered by CVWD, which maintains and operates a comprehensive system to collect and transport flows through the City. The City is served by Waste Management of the Desert for solid waste disposal. Nonhazardous, mixed municipal solid waste is taken to three landfills within the Coachella Valley. Local Environmental Setting The subject site is partially developed at present. The existing residential units are served with utility connections and access from Fred Waring Drive an Adams Street, which is not fully improved to ultimate design. No flood control facilities exist on or near the site, though in its history no susceptibility to flooding has been observed. A through F - No Impact. The proposed residential development will not impact existing utility services or create a need for additional services. All utilities exist on the site and can be upgraded to adequately serve the project. The proponent will need to prepare a hydrology study to determine the necessary provisions to comply with the City's on -site retention requirements. 3.13 AESTHETICS Local Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is partially located within a desert valley cove. There are hillsides to the west and south of the City. Views of the desert and surrounding mountains are visible on clear days throughout most of the City. The project area is a developed, medium density section of the City. Views of the Santa Rosa and Coral Reef Mountains exist to the south and west. A - Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will not significantly affect or impede any existing views, as the site is not in the view line of any significant viewsheds as identified in the visual assessment contained in the LQMEA. Fred Waring is identified in the General Plan as a Primary Image Corridor, but no specific design concepts have been imposed on new development in the area. B - No Impact The project is likely to have more of a demonstrable pwittve aesthetic effect. The vacant portions of the property have created dead-end streets and blowsand and dust accumulations, as well as a perceived sense ofblight and decreased safety commonly associated with an uncompleted project, when compared with other area development, and serves to create a negative aesthetic view impact. In this respect, the proposed project is anticipated to enhance the site's aesthetics. C - Less Than Significant Impact There will be additional lighting improvements for the new residences, in addition to those which exist for the current developed area. It is not anticipated that light and glare will be excessive in consideration of other development along the Fred Waring corridor in this area. 3,14 CULTURAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The most likely locations of prehistoric cultural resources in the La Quinta area are along the foothills. The settling of the La Quinta area has been chronicled by the La Quinta Historical Society in several publications and 12 museum exhibits. There are 13 designated historical structures and sites recorded on the California Historic Resources Inventory. These resources are listed in the La Quinta General Plan. Local Environmental Seating The proposal is in a developing urbanized residential area; there is little likelihood that any cultural resources exist in the area. The property was surveyed in 1988; no evidence of any cultural significance was discovered on the site. No historic structures exist in the immediate area or on the site itself. SECTION PENDING SUBMITTAL OF CRA A, B - Less Than Significant Impact A new cultural resource assessment was requested for the site in August, 1996. This assessment found that no cultural resources were observed on the study area There could, however, be potential impacts to cultural resources (paleontologic and archaeologic) due to the proposal, related primarily to earthwork necessary to prepare the site for development. The cultural resources assessment prepared for the site indicates moderate sensitivity for such resources, but that potential exists for buried resources. It will be required that archaeological monitoring occur during grading activities for the project, to insure that any encountered resources are properly investigated and evaluated upon discovery. C, D, E - No Impact The project will not affect historic resources, as the cultural resource survey prepared for the site did not identify any potential historic resources. There is no evidence of any potential to effect a change which would impact any ethnic cultural value(s) or restrict, limit or otherwise impact any existing religious use(s) on the site. 3.15 RECREATION Local Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta has an adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan that assesses the existing resources and facilities and the fiitum needs of the City. The City contains approximately 28.7 acres of developed parkland for Quimby Act purposes. There are also bike and equestrian pathways and trails within the City and designated pedestrian hiking trails. A, B - No Impact The proposed project will not affect demand for recreational facilities or affect existing recreational facilities or opportunities. Earlier project development incorporated a bikeway/sidewalk along Fred Waring Drive, consistent with the adopted Bikeway Plan. Adams Park, a 2.5 acre neighborhood park is located within one-half mile of the tract, to the south along Adams Street. The Initial Study for the proposed project did not discover any significant impacts associated with the project. The development as proposed with the project will not have any significant growth -inducing impacts, as the site is partially developed with residential uses, in accordance with the previous tract approval for the overall site. However, the new development could accelerate further residential development in the area, which has already been designated and planned for in the rPme-a' Plin. se 13 The following findings can be made regarding the mandatory findings of significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines and based on the results of this environmental assessment: * The proposed residential tract map does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the project in question is proposed to complete the currently existing, previously approved residential units, and will not be developed in any manner which could substantially change existing conditions or generally approved land uses in the area, * The proposed residential tract map will not have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term goals, as the development proposed is the same project previously approved for the site and is consistent with residential uses already developed and in place on the site, * The proposed residential tract map will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed projects in the immediate vicinity, in that the development, whether approved or not, will have no measurable effect upon surrounding development as currently approved or permitted under the existing General Plan for the site, * The proposed residential tract map will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the development contemplates the same uses as those already assigned and approved as part of the La Quinta General Plan and previous tract 23773, and which were addressed in the Environmental Impact Report previously certified for the General Plan and the Negative Declaration previously adopted for EA 88-104; Tract 23773. A. Earlier Analyses Used. The following documents were used and/or referred to in the preparation of this assessment: • La Quinta General Plan Update; October 1992 • La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment; October 1992 • Final Environmental Impact Report; La Quinta General Plan Update, October 1992 • Cultural Resources Assessment for Tract 23773, refiled, August 1996 • Environmental Assessment 88-104, adopted March 21, 1988 These and various other documents on file with the Community Development Department were used in the preparation of this Initial Study. E. Impacts Adequately Addressed. No potentially significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. The proposed development is within the scope of the La Quinta General Plan and the previous approves. for tract 23773; effects identified as less than significant were adciresse.. within the previous environmental documentation as indicated, or will be mitigated through incorporation of typical development conditions. f � s 14 C. Mitigation Measures. No mitigation measures have been identified in this addendum beyond routine City requirements as applied to conditional approval of a given project. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has not been prepared, as the standard requirements were referred to in this addendum and will be incorporated into the conditions of approval for this tract. Prepared by: Wallace H. Nesbit Associate Planner l= PH #3 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CASE NOS.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23773 (PHASES 2-7) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96-589 REQUESTS: (1) APPROVAL OF THE SUBDIVISION OF 28.4-ACRES INTO 101 SINGLE FAMILY AND OTHER LETTERED PRIVATE STREET LOTS PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND (2) COMPATIBILITY REVIEW OF NEW HOUSE PLANS UNDER CHAPTER 9.60.290 OF THE ZONING CODE LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND ADAMS STREET (ATTACHMENT #1) APPLICANT: STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. (MR. GEORGE C. LANE) PROPERTY OWNER: SAME AS APPLICANT DEVELOPER: DEANE VENTURES (MR. JIM DEANE) ENGINEER: V/S ASSOCIATES (MR. ROBERT C. VATCHER) ARCHITECT: MR. DENNIS C. WOOD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 96-327 HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CERTIFICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL BECAUSE THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. GENERAL PLAN: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ZONING: RL (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) STRTPC.237,12A BACKGROUND: Site Background The Starlight Dunes development is located on the north side of Fred Waring Drive and west of Adams Street. Access to the Tract occurs by using Galaxy Drive on Fred Waring Drive or Adams Street with only right-in/right-out access permitted on Fred Waring Drive. Rick Johnson Construction installed the perimeter street and landscape improvements during development of the existing Phase #1 tract improvements. In 1989, the Planning Commission and City Council approved the subdivision of the 45.6- acre site into 154 single family residential and two common retention basin lots (Tentative Tract Map No. 23773) under Resolution No. 89-36. The Map received three one-year time extensions beginning in 1991. In 1993, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 428 permitting all active tentative maps two additional years without any penalties to the provisions outlined in the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 13) and State Subdivision Map Act. Phase #1 (54-lots on Aurora Way and Skyward Way) of the Tract was recorded and developed in 1989. The unrecorded Tract phases (2-7) expired on March 21, 1996. At this time, forty-seven houses exist within the Tract. The existing houses range in size from 2,084 to 3,332+ square feet (3 and 4 bedrooms) and have two- or three -car garages. The Apollo and Phoenix houses are two-story structures. Previous Tract Condition #24 (Resolution No. 93-22) required 75% of the houses along Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street to be one story (i.e., maximum 20' in height) within 150-feet of the ultimate right-of- way. Surrounding Zoning/Land Use The properties on the east side of Adams Street are in the County of Riverside (Bermuda Dunes Country Club) and either vacant or developed with single family houses. The properties to the north and northwest are in the County and are vacant or developed with either single family houses, a church, and commercial nurseries. To the south and southwest, across Fred Waring Drive, are the established residential developments known as La Quinta Highlands and Las Vistas. The properties to the west are in La Quinta and zoned for residential development. New Application Submittals In July 1996, an application was submitted requesting approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 23773. The original tract number was used to preserve the Tract's continuity and permit the existing owners to use the previously prepared improvement plans. Six construction phases are proposed (101 single family lots) on 28.4-acres. A copy of the map is attached (Attachment #2, Reduced). The applicant proposes no major changes since the City's last STRTPC.237,12A review of the Tract in 1993 under Resolution No. 93-22 (Time Extension #3) except to meet current Code standards. The applicant submitted a Site Development Permit Application for approval of three prototype units within this Tract Phases 2-7 in September. The plan submittal is incomplete. Therefore, Mr. Jim Deane has requested this application be continued to the meeting of October 8, 1996 (Attachment # 3). A thorough discussion of the proposal will be presented then. In summary, the three unit types will vary in size form 2,675 to 3,247 square feet. Public Notice The case was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on September 1, 1996. All property owners within 500-feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. No negative comments have been received. All correspondence received before the meeting will be given to the Planning Commission. Snecia/ Note: Site Plan Development Permit No. 96-589 was previously identified as Precise Plan No. 96-861. Public Agency Review Staff mailed a copy of the applicant's request to all public agencies on July 23, 1996, for response by August 5, 1996. All comments have been incorporated into the attached draft Conditions of Approval. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Issue #1 - General Plan/Zoning Code Consistency This site is designated Low Density Residential (2-4 dwellings per acre) in the General Plan. The Zoning Code Update designates this site as RL (Low Density Residential) with a minimum lot size of 7,200 sq. ft. The single family lots are generally 9,000 sq. ft. (90' wide by 100' deep) or larger which is consistent with the RL provisions. No irregularities are evident, and proposed Condition #58 (TTM) requires the applicant to comply with provisions of the RL Zoning Code. Issue #2 - Tract Design/Improvements Galaxy Drive will provide access to the Starlight Dunes development with other streets providing internal access. All interior private streets will be 50-feet in right-of-way width and provide access to all single family lots. The City's General Plan requires private cul- de-sac street bulbs to have a curb -to -curb diameter of 90' based on Table 2 of the Circulation Element. The applicant's plans show a 76' diameter curb -to -curb cul-de-sac STRTPC.237,12A bulbs because the plans are based on 1989 requirements. Staff recommends the cul-de- sac widths be modified to be consistent with the General Plan standard (See proposed Condition #32 of TTM). The Conditions of Approval require improvements for this project that include streets and other infrastructure improvements necessary for development pursuant to the Subdivision Ordinance (Title 13) provisions. The recommended Conditions guarantee that all on -site work is consistent with City and other public agency standards. Issue #3 - Health and Safety Concerns The proposed Conditions of Approval require installation of all necessary infrastructure improvements. These include water, sewer, streets, and other necessary improvements. New electric services for each lot will be undergrounded and meet all requirements of the local service agencies (gas, electric, water, etc.). Private septic systems will not be permitted since an off -site sewer line exists within Fred Waring Drive and existing houses to service this area. Plans and fees shall be submitted and paid to the respective serving agency. Issue #4 - Environmental Assessment In 1989, Environmental Assessment No. 88-104 was prepared for Tentative Tract Map No. 23773. The Planning Commission and City Council certified the assessment by adoption of a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures. The Community Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 for this application. A copy is attached (Attachment #4). The City's Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the CRM TECH Cultural Resources Report on September 19, 1996, and concluded that the material presented was acceptable and met City guidelines as to content and format presented. (Minutes from the meeting will be given to the Commission prior to the meeting.) With this information, the Environmental Assessment concludes that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environmental based on implementation of the Conditions of Approval. Staff Comments The applicant has stated to staff that they would like the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the tentative tract map to the City Council so that they can work on their final mapping requirements while they complete their architectural plans. CONCLUSION:. Conditions are proposed that comply with the existing provisions of the General Plan, Municipal Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance. No physical constraints prevent the STRTPC.237,12A development of the site as planned. Findings for a recommendation of approval are included in the attached Resolutions. 1. Adopt Resolution No. 96- , recommending to the City Council approval of Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 for Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7); and, 2. Adopt Resolution No. 96- , recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7), subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval as attached; and, 3. Adopt Minute Motion No. 96- , continuing the public hearing for Site Development Permit No. 96-589 to October 8, 1996, to permit the applicant to complete the architectural drawings for the project. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Tract Map Exhibit (Reduced) 3. Letter from Mr. Jim Deane 4. Environmental Assessment (EA #96-327) 5. Large Map Exhibit (PC only) Prepared by: ,Greg Trousdell, Associate Planner Submitted by: Christine di lorio, Planning Manager STRTPC.237,12A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 96-327, PREPARED FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23773 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 96-327 STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24th day of September, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 and Tentative Tract Map No. 23773; and, WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA No. 96-327); and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said Tentative Tract Map application will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and that a Negative Declaration of environmental impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly, in that no significant impacts have been identified, and any significant impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance by compliance with City requirements. 2. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, due to the lack of such factors existing on or near the site. BAsS096-327, l2a Planning Commission Resolution 96- 3. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as the site has been previously approved for development as part of an existing residential tract, which was reviewed subject to CEQA and incorporates mitigation measures conditioned upon the initial overall project. 4. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. The proposed residential subdivision is consistent with the designated land use and policy guidance adopted for the La Quinta General Plan, for which mitigation measures were adopted to ensure that future development in accordance with said Plan would not have detrimental effects on the environment beyond those identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted for the La Quinta General Plan. 5. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, in that the site is located on an urbanizing Arterial Corridor, with infrastructure to support such development already in place, and is part of a previously approved residential tract which was originally reviewed subject to CEQA and is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: That the recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby recommend certification of Environmental Assessment No. 96- 327 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 24th day of September, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: EARES096-327,12a JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23773 (PHASES 2-7) TO ALLOW A 101-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND SALES SUBDIVISION AND MISCELLANEOUS AMENITY LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 28.4-ACRES CASE NO.: TTM No. 23773 (PHASES 2-7) APPLICANT: STARLIGHT ESTATES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24th day of September, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for a 28.4-acre site with 101 single family lots, generally on the north side of Fred Waring Drive and east of Adams Street, more particularly described as: Portion of the S'/ SE% of Section 18, T5S, R7E, SBBM (APN: 609-080-011 and 609-480-020) WHEREAS, said Tentative Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution No. 83-63). The Community Development Department has prepared EA No. 96-327 for this project which states the project will not have a significant impact on the environment based on Conditions; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following Mandatory Findings of approval to justify a recommendation for approval of said Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7): A. The proposed map is consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan and any applicable specific plans. The property is within a Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) District per the provisions of the 1992 General Plan Update. The project density is 3.5 dwellings per acre for Phases 2-7 which is under the maximum level for the LDR District. Tentative Tract No. 23773 (Phases 2-7) is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2) provided conditions are met. The site is zoned RL (Low Density Residential District) which permits single family development on lots a least 7,200 sq. ft. The proposed lots average 9,000 sq. ft. Future housing shall be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code (e.g., RESOPC.300-4a/ cond i 73a Resolution 96- specifically Chapter 9.30.030 et. seq.) in effect at the time building permits are acquired. B. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and any applicable specific plans. All streets and improvements in the project as conditioned will conform to City standards as outlined in the General Plan and Subdivision Ordinance. All on -site streets will be private (50' wide right-of-way) which is consistent with the Circulation Element (Chapter 3.0). Access to the Tract will be from Galaxy Drive on Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street. The density and design standards for the tract will comply with the Land Use Element (Chapter 2.0) of the General Plan and the Zoning Code. C. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed land division as approved in 1989, and portions of the site were previously graded in anticipation of this development additional phases of Tract Map No. 23773. Mitigation fees and environmental studies (i.e., archaeological and noise) were completed as required prior to development of the project in 1989. A new Cultural Resources Report was required for Tract Phases 2-7 because the original study was more than five years old. The new study states that no known prehistoric sites have been previously recorded on this property, therefore, archaeological monitoring will not be required during site development unless human remains are found during excavation work. This project will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to fish or wildlife, or their habitat because mitigation measures were completed at the time the site was disturbed or will be mitigated based on the proposed Conditions of Approval. D. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision, as conditionally approved, will not cause serious public health problems because they will install urban improvements based on City, State, and Federal requirements. E. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed streets are planned to provide direct access to each single family lot. All required public easements will provide access to the site or support necessary RES0Pc.3oo-4a/eond773a Resolution 96- infrastructure improvements. The original builder provided site access to Tract Phases 2-7. WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Tract Map, the Planning Commission has considered, the effect of the contemplated action on housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of La Quinta and its environs with available fiscal and environmental resources; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case; 2. That it does recommend approval to the City Council of Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 (Phases 2-7) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Planning Commission, held on this the 24th day of September, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California RESOPC.300-4deond773a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL .. RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.23773 - STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CONDITIONS QF APPROVAL GENERAL 1. Upon their approval by the City Council, the City Clerk is authorized to file these Conditions of Approval with the Riverside County Recorder for recordation against the properties to which they apply (i.e., Assessor's Parcel Numbers 609-080-011 and 609-480-020). 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 23773 shall comply with the requirements and standards of §§66410- 66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. This map shall expire two years alter acceptance by the City Council unless extended pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance (Chapter 13.12.150(B)). 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: - Fire Marshal - Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) - Community Development Department - Riverside County Environmental Health Department - Desert Sands Unified School District - Coachella Valley Water District - Imperial Irrigation District - California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) - Sunline Transit The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. For projects requiring NPD]ES construction permits, the applicant shall include a copy of the application for the Notice of Intent with grading plans submitted for plan checking. Prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit, the applicant shall submit a copy of an approved Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan. 4. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Infrastructure Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. COND.773-12a PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. All easements, rights of way and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary to facilitate the ultimate use of the development and functioning of improvements shall be dedicated, granted or otherwise conferred, or the process of said dedication, granting, or conferral shall be ensured, prior to approval of a final map or filing of a certificate of compliance for waiver of a final map. The conferral shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant easements to the City for access to and maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of all essential improvements which are located on privately -held lots or parcels. With respect to the drainage basin located in the existing Tract No. 23773-1, the conferral shall include the granting of drainage rights for all areas located within the original tentative map and access rights, for the purpose of construction, reconstruction and maintenance of the basin, to the homeowners association(s) for the entire original tentative map area. 6. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties. 7. The applicant shall dedicate three-foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The applicant shall dedicate any easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 9. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the Public Works Director. 10. As part of the filing package for final map approval, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media and in a program format acceptable to the Public Works Director. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu choices so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. IMPROVEMENT PLANS 11. Improvement plans submitted to the City for plan checking shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." All plans except precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for the Public Works Director. Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, gates and entryways, and parking lots. If water and sewer plans are included on the street and drainage plans, the plans shall have an additional signature block for the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). COND.773-12a The combined plans shall be signed by CVWD prior to their submittal for the Public Works Director's signature. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include landscape improvements, irrigation, lighting, and perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the Public Works Director. 12. In lieu of submitting new plans for any element of construction, the subdivider may propose to use existing, .approved plans developed for the original tentative map provided the plans comply with existing requirements. 13. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City Resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 14. When final plans are approved by the City, and prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the Public Works Director. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu choices so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions including approved revisions to the plans. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 15. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or enter into a secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to agendization of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Title 13, LQ.MC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 16. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide approved estimates of improvement costs. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the Public Work Director. Estimates for utilities and other improvements under the jurisdiction of outside agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, tract improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 17. If the applicant desires to phase improvements and obligations required by the conditions of approval and secure those phases separately, a phasing plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the Public Works Director. ;OND.773-12a The applicant shall complete required improvements and satisfy obligations as set forth in the approved phasing plan. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase unless a construction sequencing plan for that phase is approved by the Public Works Director. 18. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (site development permits, conditional use permits, etc.), off -site improvements and development -wide improvements (ie: retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates, etc.) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first final map unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. 19. The applicant shall pay cash or provide security in guarantee of cash payment for applicant's required share of improvements which have been or will be constructed by others (participatory improvements). Participatory improvements for this development include: A. One half of a raised, landscaped median on Fred Waring Street from Adams Street to the west boundary of Tract No. 23773-1. The applicant's obligations for all or a portion of the participatory improvements may, at the City's option, be satisfied by participation in a major thoroughfare improvement program if this development becomes subject to such a program. GRADING 20. Graded, undeveloped land shall be maintained to prevent dust and blowsand nuisances. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 21. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the Applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. In accordance with said Chapter, the Applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 22. The applicant shall comply with the City's flood protection ordinance. 23. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and must meet the approval of the Public Works Director prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report produced for the original tentative map and shall be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the final map(s), if any are required of this development, that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 24. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within this development, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. .OND.773-12a If the applicant is unable to comply with the pad elevation differential requirement, the City will consider and may approve alternatives that preserve community acceptance and buyer satisfaction with the proposed development. 25. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a separate document, bearing the seal and signature of a California registered civil engineer or surveyor, that lists actual building pad elevations for the building lots. The document shall list the pad elevation approved on the grading plan, the as -built elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. The data shall be organized by lot number and shall be listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 26. Stormwater falling on the site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm shall be retained in the retention basin located in Tract No. 23773-1. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 27. The applicant shall complete improvements to the retention basin located in Tract No. 23773-1. 28. Fences or walls will not be allowed around the retention basin except as approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. 29. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. , UTILITIES 30. All existing and proposed utilities within or adjacent to the proposed development shall be installed underground. High -voltage power lines which the power authority will not accept underground are exempt from this requirement. 31. In areas where hardscape surface improvements are planned, underground utilities shall be installed prior to construction of surface improvements. The applicant shall provide certified reports of utility trench compaction testis for approval of the Public Works Director. 32. The following minimum street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the Circulation Element of the General Plan (Chapter 3.0): PRIVATE STREETS AND CUL DE SACS 1) Residential - 36 feet wide if double loaded (buildings on both sides), 32 feet if single loaded. 2) Cul de sac curb radius - 45' 33. Access points and turning movements of traffic shall be limited to those approved for the original tentative tract map. COND.773-12a 34. Improvements shall include all appurtenances such as traffic signs, channelization markings, raised medians if required, street name signs, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters approved in design and location by the U.S. Post Office and the Public Works Director. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 35. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by registered professional engineer(s) authorized to practice in the State of California. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted Standard and Supplemental Drawings and Specifications, and as approved by the Public Works Director. 36. Street right of way geometry for cul-de-sacs, knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #800, #801, and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. 37. All streets proposed to serve residential or other access driveways shall be designed and constructed with curbs and gutters or shall have other approved methods to convey nuisance water without ponding in yard or drive areas and to facilitate street sweeping. 38. Street pavement sections shall be based on a Caltrans design for a 20-year life and shall consider soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including site and building construction traffic). The minimum pavement sections shall be as follows: Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" a.b. Collector 4.011/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.511/6.50" The applicant shall submit current (no more than two years old) mix designs for base materials, Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete, including complete mix design lab results, for review and approval by the City. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (no more than six months old) aggregate gradation test results which confirm that the mix design gradations can be reproduced in production of the base or paving material. Construction operations shall not be scheduled until mix designs are approved. 39. Prior to occupancy of homes or other permanent buildings within the development, the applicant shall install all street and sidewalk improvements, traffic control devices and street name signs along access routes to those buildings. 1021111T*� 40. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots, landscape setback areas, medians, common retention basins, and park facilities shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Community Development Department. Landscape and irrigation construction plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plans are not approved for construction until they COND.773-12a have been approved and signed by the Public Works Director, the Coachella Valley Water District, and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner. 41. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way. 42. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Public Works Director. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 5-feet of curbs along public streets. 43. Unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director, common basins and park areas shall be designed with a turf grass surface which can be mowed with standard tractor -mounted equipment. 44. The applicant shall ensure that landscaping plans and utility plans are coordinated to provide visual screening of above -ground utility structures. 45. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the Public Works Director. 46. The applicant shall employ or retain California registered civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, or surveyors, as appropriate, who will provide, or have their agents provide, sufficient supervision and verification of the construction to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 47. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all plans which were signed by the Public Works Director. Each sheet of the drawings shall have the words "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" clearly marked on each sheet and be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCad plan files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as - constructed condition. MAINTENANCE 478. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous maintenance of drainage, landscaping and on -site street improvements. 49. The applicant shall pay all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposit and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 50. Parkland fees shall be paid prior to final map approval as required by Chapter 13.48 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 51. Fringe -Toed Lizard habitat mitigation fees shall be prior to site grading or issuance of a building permit. COND.773-12a 52. Two checks made out to the County of Riverside in the amounts of $1,250.00 and $78.00 for the project's environmental assessment (Negative Declaration) shall be submitted to the Community Development Department within 24-hours after review of the map by the City Council. � I iZaW."t- all Iae 53. Schedule A fire protection approved Super fire hydrants (6" X 4" X 2'/2" X 2'/2") will be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330-feet apart in any direction with any portion of any frontage more than 165-feet from a fire hydrant. Mn imum fire flow will be 1,000 g.p.m. for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi. 54. Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant/developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. Plans will conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system will meet the fire flow requirements. Plans will be approved and signed by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 55. The required water system including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 56. A temporary water supply for fire protection maybe allowed for the construction of the model units only. Plans for a temporary water system must be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to issuance of building permits. 1_ ' ��,_U_s ' 57. If human remains or other historical artifacts are found during excavation, no further grading or excavation shall occur until appropriate mitigation measures are completed, as per current State, County and City requirements. The Community Development Department shall be notified if human remains are found. 58. The Tract layout shall comply with all the RL Zoning Code requirements (Chapter 9.30.030). 59. The City Attorney shall approve the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC and R's) for the Tract prior to approval of the final map(s) by the City Council. COND.773-12a ATTACHMENTS FOR TTM #23773/SDP#96-589 ATTACH4C Attachment 1 Vicinity Map Case No: TTM 23773 Location: NW corner of Fred Waring Dr. and Adams St. Applicant: Starlight Estates Legal Description: Being a portion of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 5361 STARUGHT LANE FRED WARlNG DRIVE e Vin7-c n PHASE eRACT_NO_ LOTS Attachment 2 2 23773-2 17 3 23773-3 •7 4 23773-4 20 JN 85-01-00 5 23773-5 24 ZZ-7CEE i -2= 6 23773-6 20 7 23773 13 .3-31-94 101 TOTAL (NOTE: Adjacent Phases may be combined) I P Hi A S IE I ( ECOR ED) S. Lns Ln N0 \ ' Co O _ fri , ` I0 N --- tv j; CD �' _ .0 N _ PCL, ►&SS WAYCD _ y N [� > f .D ' r -u V N Co x _ � J 11 a li• \ ` _ i -U I ,t V W N • >r l ---- ' - Co 01955 C7. ~ PiSw5 WAY I IP.Lo Pu AE tl I I ro cn A G I •ya�� f ' I' (D a(DI o I �`e ! i i i i I �l CD w NrA S �. (D w (D n — �— _ I (RECCJRDED ) fi H. n Su-�- O rr :I (D ADAIAS —fir--�-------.._._ C� > In N F+• N r u Sep-16-96 08:43A DEANE 714 754 1543 P.01 Jim Deane Community Development Department City of La Quinta Fax(619) 777-7155 Attn: Greg Trousdell Re: Tract 23773 Dear Mr. Trousdell, Attachment 3 September I6, 1996 We hereby request that our tentative map application be heard as scheduled at the Planning Commission Hearing on September 24th. We would like to defer the approval of our house plans until the next hearing on October S, 1996. Sincerely Deane Starlight Estates Inc. ECOVE SEP 16 1996 CITY OF LAQUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O Box 5140 Newport Beach, Ca 92662 (714)754.1517 Fax (714)754-1543 Attachment 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Assessment No. 96-327 Case No.: TT 23773 Date: August 6, 1996 L Name of Proponent: Starlight Estates, Inc. Address: 82-050 54th Avenue, Thermal, CA 92274 Phone: 619-398-2075 Agency Requiring Checklist: City of La Quinta Project Name (if applicable): Tentative Tract 23773; _ .a portion of a previously approved 154 lot subdivision, comprising 101 lots on 28.4 acres for the remaining unrecorded acreage of the original tract. CITY OF LA QUINTA Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 cklst.327 II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services Popullation and Housing Biological Resources Utilities Earth Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics HWater Risk of Upset and Human Health Cultural Resources Air Quality Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance III. DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least 1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a `potentially significant impact" or "potential significant unless mitigated". An ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signature: Date: August 6, 1996 Printed Name and Title: Wallace Nesbit, Associate Planner i Potamially Potentially Significant Lev T1= significant Unlma Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (source #(s): X b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? X c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? X d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? X 3.2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? X b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? X c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? X 3.3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? X b) Seismic ground shaking X c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? X e) Landslides or mudflows? X f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? X g) Subsidence of the land? X ii t Potentally Potentially Significant Lea Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact h) Expansive soils? X i) Unique geologic or physical features? X 3.4. WATER. Would the project result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? X f1 Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? X g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? X h) Impacts to groundwater quality? X 3.5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any air quality standard, or contribute to any existing or projected air quality violation? X b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? X c) Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? X d) Create objectional odors? X iii t Potenually Pot.nually Significant Lem Theo Significant Unless sigwfica t NO Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the project result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? x b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? X d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? x f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 3.7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? x b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? x c) Locally designated natural communities, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? iv Poteat,any Poteotiauy Significant Lev Significant Unlev Sigatficant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or mi X gration corridors? 3.8• ENERGY AND NM,iERAL RESOURCES. project: Would the a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? 3.9. RISK OF UPSETMUM[AN HEALTH. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, Pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response Plan or emergency evacuation plan? X c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health , hazards? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased X fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? X 3.10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? X b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ X t 3.11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an eff upon, or result inect -a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? v Potentially Potentially Significant Lean Than Significant unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact !Vo Impact b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X e) Other governmental services? X 3.12. UTILITIES. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substandal alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X b) Communications systems? X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? X d) Sewer or septic tanks? X e) Storm water drainage? X 0 Solid waste disposal? X 3.13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? X b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? X c) Create light or glare? X 3.14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? X b) Disturb archaeological resources? X c) Affect historical resources? X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which r would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X PotanuaUv Potenuady Significant Less rhan significant Ualeaa Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 3.15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? X 4. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 7 b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental gam? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. EgTIAL STUDY - ADDENDUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-327 Prepared for: TENTATIVE TRACT 23773 STARLIGHT ESTATES, INC. 82-020 54TH AVENUE THERMAL, CA 92274 Prepared by: Community Development Department City of La Quinta 78-495 Cade Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 August 8,1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview 12 Purpose of Initial Study 1.3 Background of Environmental Review 1.4 Summary of Preliminary Environmental Review 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location and Environmental Setting 2.2 Physical Characteristics 2.3 Operational Characteristics 2.4 Objectives 2.5 Discretionary Actions 2.6 Related Projects 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 3.1 Land Use and Planning 3.2 Population and Housing 3.3 Earth Resources 3.4 Water 3.5 Air Quality 3.6 Transportation/Circulation 3.7 Biological Resources 3.8 Energy and Mineral Resources 3.9 Risk of Upset/Human Health 3.10 Noise 3.11 Public Services 3.12 Utilities 3.13 Aesthetics 3.14 Cultural Resources 3.15 Recreation 4 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 5 EARLIER ANALYSIS Page 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 10 II 11 12 12 13 ra 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency for project review, as defined by Section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Lead Agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project as defined by CEQA. The City of La Quinta, as the Lead Agency, has the authority to oversee the environmental review and to approve the project. 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE E TTIAL STUDY As part of the environmental review for the proposed project, the City of La Quinta Community Development Department has prepared this Initial Study. This document provides a basis for determining the nature and scope of the subsequent environmental review for the project. The purposes of the Initial Study, as stated in Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, include the following: To provide the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) or a negative declaration for a project; To enable the applicant or the City of La Quints to modify the project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact; To assist in the preparation of an EIR., should one be required, by focusing the analysis on those issues that will be adversely impacted by the proposed project; To facilitate environmental review early in the design of the project; To provide documentation for the findings in a negative declaration that the project will not have a • significant effect on the environment; To eliminate unnecessary EIR's; and To determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. 1.3 BACKGROUND OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was deemed subject to the environmental review requirements of CEQA in light of changes in the surrounding area since the original approval of Tentative Tract 23773 in March, 1989. The Environmental Officer for the Community Development Department has prepared this Initial Study and addendum for review and certification by the Planning Commission and City Council for the City of La Quinta prior to approval of the proposed project. 4 1.4 SUMMARY OF PRELBUNARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This Initial Study did not indicate potential for significant environmental impacts. As a result, no project -specific mitigation measures are recommended, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be recommended for this proposal. General mitigation routinely as required by the City for most projects are referenced in this addendum. Any changes made by the applicant to the project as a result of this assessment, design review or other reason, which would necessitate changes to this addendum, are shown in italics as part of this document in the issue area which any such changes may affect. ��_ fly_ � .� ' _._ 1 1_ �l_ ► �;_I_�11 � �I 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City of La Quinta is a 31.18 square mile municipality located in the southwesterly portion of the Coachella Valley. The City is bounded on the west by the City of Indian Wells, on the east by the City of Indio and Riverside County, on the north by Riverside County, and federal and county lands to the south. The City of La Quinta was incorporated on May 1,1982. The subject site consists of approximately 28 acres located on the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street. The site is a portion of a previously subdivided 45 acre, 154 lot tract which expired in March, 1996 with only the initial phase (53 lots) having been recorded in July, 1989. The unrecorded areas for which this project is submitted are vacant and predominantly undisturbed. Small areas in the northeasterly portion of the site, which were designated for retention area, have been previously disturbed due to development of the initial phase due to use as storage for construction materiaWequipment, etc. 2.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The proposal involves resubdividing the remaining 28 acres of the original tract 23773 under the same tract number. Currently there are 47 existing units, which were completed in 1989 and 1990. 2.3 OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS The tract is currently developed with a portion of the street system to serve the existing residential units. The streets are private and the project incorporates two existing gated entries. No change to the concept or scale and scope of the original project is proposed with the refiled map. 2.4 OBJECTIVES The objective of the tract map is to complete the existing project in substantial conformance with the original approval for tract 23773. 2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS A discretionary action is an action taken by a government agency (for this project, the government agency is the City of La Quinta ) that calls for the exercise of judgment in deciding whether to approve or carry out a project. The proposed project will require discretionary approval from the Planning Commission and City Council for the following: Certification of the Environmental Assessment for the project; Recommendation and Approval of the Tentative Tract Application. 2.6 RELATED PROJECTS There are no related projects to this proposal under review at present. This section analyzes potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed tract map. CEQA issue areas are evaluated in this addendum as contained in the Initial Study Checklist. Under each checklist item, the environmental setting is discussed, including a description of conditions as they presently exist within the City and the areas affected by the proposed project. Thresholds for significance are defined either by standards adopted by responsible or trustee agencies or by referring to criteria in CEQA, Appendix G. 3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, in the eastern portion of Riverside County. The valley is abundant with both plant and animal life. Topographical relief ranges from 237 feet below mean sea level (msl) to about 2,000 feet above msl. The valley is surrounded by the San Jacinto Mountains, the Santa Rosa Mountains, the Orocopia Mountains, and the San Bernardino Mountain range. The San Andreas fault transects the northeastern edge of the valley. Local Environmental Setting The subject site is primarily undisturbed. There are 47 residential units established within the site, which was being built out on a market demand basis. The residential uses are consistent with the General Plan and zoning currently in effect. The City has recently adopted a revised zoning code effective September 5, 1996. The • surrounding Riverside County land use designations on the north and east are Residential 2B (2-5 units/acre), consistent with La Quinta designations for the site and properties to the south and west at Low Density Residential (2-4 units/acre). A through D - No Impact. The tract map does not propose uses inconsistent with the currently existing or future land uses contemplated for the project area. The revised zoning code allows a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet; previous zoning on the property required minimum lot sizes of 9,000 square feet. The tract map submitted incorporates the previous improvement provisions and lot sizes from the past approval; no changes are proposed which would result in any significant impacts. 3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSING Regional Environmental Setting The City's population as of January, 1996, is estimated by the State Department of Finance to be 18,046 persons. In addition to permanent residents, the City has approximately 9,300 seasonal residents who spend three to six months in the City. It is estimated that 30% of all housing units in the City are used by seasonal residents. The average occupancy is 2.85 persons per occupied unit (1990 Census; 1996 State Dep't of Finance). Local Environmental Setting The immediate area is designated for Low Density Residential (LDR) on the General Plan Land Use Policy Diagram. The surrounding area to the north and east is under Riverside County jurisdiction and designated for residential at a similar density. A through C - No Impact. The proposed tract will not affect the area development patterns or population distribution, and will therefore not affect any significant population increase or area growth. The proposed residential uses are consistent with those which at one time were approved and now partially established for the site. 3.3 EARTH RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta has a varied topography, from gently sloping alluvial fans, steep hillsides, to relatively flat desert floor. The alluvial soils that make up most of the City's soil types are underlain by igneous -metamorphic rock, as seen in outcrops in the Santa Rosa Mountains and the Coral reef Mountains. Soils on the valley floor are made up of very fine grain unconsolidated silty sands. Local Environmental Setting Portions of the site were disturbed due to use for temporary construction purposes during development of the initial tract phase. Most of the site is undisturbed, with a rolling topography and sandy dune features. Soils on the site consist of the Myoma series, characterized by rapid permeability. A, C through I - No Impact. The proposed project will not present any significant impacts pertaining to these issue areas. Seismic or other ground rupture is not considered to be a significant hazard due to the absence of active faults in the City. The site and surrounding area is not identified as being subject to liquefaction. No potential for seiche or tsunami exists in the desert, and volcanic activity is not applicable to this region. The site has no significant relief features and is therefore not subject to landslide or mudflows. No impacts due to soil instability are anticipated beyond those commonly associated with and mitigated during construction activity. Land subsidence and expansive soil impacts are not seen as significant due to the physical nature of underlying granitic and metamorphic geology and sand soil units. No unique geologic or physical features exist on or surrounding the site (LQME& Site survey). The project will be required to file and receive approval of grading plans prior to any construction commencing on -site. B - Less Than Significant Impact The site is located in an area identified on the Environmental Hazards map in the LQMEA as being in a Ground shaking Zone IV, subject to moderate seismic shake impacts, although throughout the City there is no significant hazard due to the absence of known active faulting within the City (LQMEA). Irregardless, some degree of Ground shaking will occur with seismic activity. The City requires all new construction to comply with the UBC standards for seismic resistance and the State Strong Motion Impact Program (SMIP). N 3.4 WATER Regional Environmental Setting Groundwater resources in the La Quinta area consist of a system of large aquifers (porous layer of rock material) and groundwater basins separated by bedrock or layers of soil that trap or retain groundwater. Water supplies are also augmented with surface water from the Colorado River transported via the Coachella Canal and stored at Lake Cahuilla. Percolation from the tributaries of the Whitewater River flowing into La Quinta from the Santa Rosa Mountains provide a natural source of groundwater replenishment. Artificial recharging of groundwater will be a requirement in the near future. Local Environmental Setting The vicinity of the project is generally unprotected from design storms by any flood control or other improvements. The site is slightly raised and level, sloping to Washington Street to achieve drainage. The site does not appear to be subject to flooding. A - Less Than Significant Impact. Current runoff rates will be incrementally increased due to the additional site area being developed, such as for additional paving, hardscape and landscaping, and therefore surface runoff will increase. This impact will not be significant as the original project approval included provisions for retention area to accommodate storm and nuisance water flows. The current developer will be required to adhere to these original provisions or provide an acceptable alternative. B Through H - No Impact. Development of the site will not expose people or property to flooding impacts or other water -related hazards. Surface waters and streams will not be affected, and ground water resource quantity and quality will not be impacted, as the site is not proximate to any water bodies or features, significant or otherwise (Site survey). 3.5 AIR QUALITY Regional Environmental Setting The Coachella Valley is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and is located in the Southeast Desert Air Basin (SEDAB). SEDAB has a distinctly different air pollution problem than the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). A discussion of the jurisdictional organization and requirements is found in the LQMEA. Currently, the SEDAB does not meet federal standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter. In the Coachella Valley, the standards for PM 10 are frequently exceeded. PM 10 is particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter that becomes suspended in the air due to winds, grading activity, and by vehicles on unpaved roads, among other causes. Local Environmental Setting The City is located in the Coachella Valley, which has an and climate, characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent and low annual rainfall, and low humidity. Variations in rainfall, temperatures, and localized winds occur throughout the valley due to the presence of the surrounding mountains. Air quality conditions are closely tied to the prevailing winds of the region. A - Less Than Significant Impact. No significant contributions to existing air quality violations are foreseen based on established thresholds. The proposed project incorporates 101 new residential units, which had already 8 been contemplated for the site in the 1992 General Plan Update. The 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Handbook indicates a significance threshold for air quality impacts in the Residential, Single Family Housing category as being at 166 units. The project's primary air quality impact will occur from construction (short-term) PM10 emissions The Coachella Valley area is currently non -attainment for PM10. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan (FRCP) will be required prior to project grading permit approval(s), in accordance with Chapter 6.16 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. B, C, D - No Impact. The proposed subdivision is entirely surrounded by other similar residential uses, and will not be a source of emissions which could affect such uses or any other sensitive receptor. It is not anticipated that the project will create any objectionable odors. No manufacturing or processing activities are proposed which could be a source of any odors. The project is not of a scale such that it will create any climatic changes. 3.6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Regional Environmental Setting The existing circulation system is a combination of early roadwork constructed by Riverside County and new roadways since incorporation of the City in 1982. Key area roadways include State Highway 111, Washington Street, Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive. Traffic volumes in La Quinta experience considerable seasonal variation, with the late -winter, early spring months representing the peak tourist season and highest traffic volumes. Local Environmental Setting The project is located along the north side of Fred Waring Drive. Some development of on -site roadways, parking and driveways already exists. Fred Waring is fully improved along the project frontage. A - Less Than Significant Impact. No significant traffic increases are anticipated due to the proposal. The project will generate approximately 1,017 daily trips (19871TE, 4th Ed.) on a typical weekday, based on 101 single family lots. This will not significantly impact the capacity of Fred Waring Drive, which is currently operating at an A -rated Level of Service (LOS) based on mid -block operational capacity. B Through G - No Impact The project design does not appear to create any safety hazards due to its layout, or any use that is not compatible with surrounding land uses. The project design will not affect access to other properties nor will it result in inadequate emergency access. The project will provide adequate on -site parking for the proposed residential units, as well as on -street parking availability. No increased hazards to pedestrians or bicyclists are associated with the proposed project. No conflicts with any existing adopted alternative transportation policies are anticipated. 3,7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta lies within the Colorado Desert. Two ecosystems are found within the City; the Sonoran Desert Scrub and the Desert Transition. The disturbed environments within the City are classified as urban or agricultural. A discussion of these ecosystems is found in the LQMEA. Local Environmental Setting The subject area is partially developed with 47 existing residential units. The LQMEA identifies the site as within the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lazard habitat mitigation fee area, for which a federal 1 OA permit was obtained pursuant to adoption of the CVFTL Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The Flat -Tailed Horned Lizard is a candidate species identified for federal endangered status, whose range extends into the project area. No mitigation procedures are in place for this species. A region -wide effort is underway to develop a Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), coordinated by CVAG and the BLM. A through E - No Impact The site has been partially disturbed and is partly developed with residential structures and paved areas. There is minimal potential for any wildlife habitat to exist on the site. Fees were paid in conjunction with development of the initial phase of the tract in 1989. Any outstanding mitigation fees will be required to be paid for the CVFTL as part of any grading permits issued for the site. 3.8 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta contains both areas of insignificant and Significant Mineral Aggregate Resources Areas (SMARA), as designated by the State Department of Conservation. There are no known oil resources in the City. Major energy resources used in the City come from the Imperial Irrigation District (TID), Southern California Gas Company, and gasoline companies. Local Environmental Setting The site does not lie within an identified area sensitive to mineral resources. Soils within the site consist of Myoma fine sand; these soils are well -drained and permeable. A, B - No Impact The proposed tract has no potential to impact energy or mineral resources in any manner, as no such resources are identified as existing on or near the site and the uses proposed do not utilize such resources to any significant degree. 3.9 RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH Regional Environmental Setting • Although large scale, hazardous waste generating employment is not yet located within La Quinta, the existence of chemicals utilized in dry cleaning operations, agricultural operations, restaurant kitchen cleaning, landscape irrigation and exposure to large scale electrical facilities may pose significant threats to various sectors of the population. Currently, there are no hazardous disposal waste sites located in Riverside County, transportation of such materials out of and through La Quinta takes place. Local Environmental Setting The project site has not been, nor will it be used for any type of manufacturing. There are no uses proposed which would require substantial amounts of chemicals, or other hazardous materials or processes. A through E - No Impact There is no potential for additional risk or health hazard due to the request, or any effect on emergency response or potential fire hazard. Development of the project will be subject to Riverside County Fire standards as in effect and applicable at the time. 10 3.10 NOISE Regional Environmental Setting Noise Ievels in the City are created by a variety of sources in and near the City. The major sources include vehicular noise on City streets and Highway 111, and temporary construction noises. The ambient noise levels are dominated by vehicular noise along the highway and major arterials. Local Environmental Setting Primary noise sources in the subject area are associated with vehicle traffic along Fred Waring Drive, and various short-term noise sources associated with urbanized residential uses. A - Less Than Significant Impact. There will be some negligible increase in noise levels due to the proposal, associated with additional traffic on -site. It is not anticipated that the residential units will constitute a significant increase in noise levels, based on the nature of the use as a sensitive noise receptor. Development of the project will have negligible effects upon noise levels or exposure to noise when considered with existing traffic patterns on Fred Waring and existing sound attenuation (wall) improvements. B - No Impact Development and operation of the project will not create any severe noise levels. Short term -construction noise impacts will be minimal in light of the existing traffic conditions on Fred Waring. Construction activities will be limited to hours as set forth in the La Quinta Municipal Code. 3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES Regional Environmental Setting Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contract with the Riverside County Sheri$'s Department. Fire protection service is provided to the City by Riverside County Fire Department. The Fire Department administers two stations in the City; Station 932 on Frances Hack Lane, and Station #70, at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54. Paramedic services are provided by Springs Ambulance Service. Health care services are provided in the City through JFK Memorial Hospital in Indio, and the Eisenhower Immediate Care Clinic located in the One -Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. Local Environmental Setting The nearest fire station to the area is Station #32 located approximately four miles south of the subject area. Governmental services in La Quinta are provided by City staff at the Civic Center. A through E - No Impact The proposal will have negligible impacts to public services. The existing approved development pattern for the area will not be altered by the development of the proposed tract, as the design is the same as that approved for the site in 1989. The project will not generate significant additional student populations, and will helve a negligible impact on police and fire protection. 3.12 ITTILITTES Regional Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is served by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) for electrical power supply and the Southern California Gas Company (SCG) for natural gas service. General Telephone Exchange (GTE) provides telephone services for the City. Continental Cablevision services the area for cable television service. 11 The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides water and sewer service to the City. CVWD obtains its water from underground aquifers and from the Colorado River. The City's storm water drainage system is administered by CVWD, which maintains and operates a comprehensive system to collect and transport flows through the City. The City is served by Waste Management of the Desert for solid waste disposal. Nonhazardous, mixed municipal solid waste is taken to three landfills within the Coachella Valley. Local Environmental Setting The subject site is partially developed at present. The existing residential units are served with utility connections and access from Fred Waring Drive an Adams Street, which is not fully improved to ultimate design. No flood control facilities exist on or near the site, though in its history no susceptibility to flooding has been observed. A through F - No Impact. The proposed residential development will not impact existing utility services or create a need for additional services. All utilities exist on the site and can be upgraded to adequately serve the project. The proponent will need to prepare a hydrology study to determine the necessary provisions to comply with the City's on -site retention requirements. 3.13 AESTHETICS Local Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is partially located within a desert valley cove. There are hillsides to the west and south of the City. Views of the desert and surrounding mountains are visible on clear days throughout most of the City. The project area is a developed, medium density section of the City. Views of the Santa Rosa and Coral Reef Mountains exist to the south and west. A - Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not significantly affect or impede any existing views, as the site is not in the view line of any significant viewsheds as identified in the visual assessment contained in the LQMEA. Fred Waring is identified in the General Plan as a Primary Image Corridor, but no specific design concepts have been imposed on new development in the area. B - No Impact The project is likely to have more of a demonstrable positive aesthetic effect. The vacant portions of the property have created dead-end streets and blowsand and dust accumulations, as well as a perceived sense of blight and decreased safety commonly associated with an uncompleted project, when compared with other area development, and serves to create a negative aesthetic view impact. In this respect, the proposed project is anticipated to enhance the site's aesthetics. C - Less Than Significant Impact There will be additional lighting improvements for the new residences, in addition to those which exist for the current developed area. It is not anticipated that light and glare will be excessive m consideration of other development along the Fred Waring corridor in this area. 3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES Regional Environmental Setting The most likely locations of prehistoric cultural resources in the La Quinta area are along the foothills. The settling of the La Quinta area has been chronicled by the La Quinta Historical Society in several publications and 12 museum exhibits. There are 13 designated historical structures and sites recorded on the California Historic Resources Inventory. These resources are listed in the La Quinta General Plan. Local Environmental Setting The proposal is in a developing urbanized residential area; there is little likelihood that any cultural resources exist in the area. The property was surveyed in 1988; no evidence of any cultural significance was discovered on the site. No historic structures exist in the immediate area or on the site itself. SECTION PENDING SUBMITTAL OF CRA A, B - Less Than Significant Impact. A new cultural resource assessment was requested for the site in August, 1996. This assessment found that no cultural resources were observed on the study area. There could, however, be potential impacts to cultural resources (paleontologic and archaeologic) due to the proposal, related primarily to earthwork necessary to prepare the site for development. The cultural resources assessment prepared for the site indicates moderate sensitivity for such resources, but that potential exists for buried resources. It will be required that archaeological monitoring occur during grading activities for the project, to insure that any encountered resources are properly investigated and evaluated upon discovery. C, D, E - No Impact The project will not affect historic resources, as the cultural resource survey prepared for the site did not identify any potential historic resources. There is no evidence of any potential to effect a change which would impact any ethnic cultural value(s) or restrict, limit or otherwise impact any existing religious use(s) on the site. 3.15 RECREATION Local Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta has an adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan that assesses the existing resources and facilities and the future needs of the City. The City contains approximately 28.7 acres of developed parkland for Quimby Act purposes. There are also bike and equestrian pathways and trails within the City and designated pedestrian hiking trails. A, B - No Impact The proposed project will not affect demand for recreational facilities or affect existing recreational facilities or opportunities. Earlier project development incorporated a bikeway/sidewalk along Fred Waring Drive, consistent with the adopted Bikeway Plan. Adams Park, a 2.5 acre neighborhood park is located within one-half mile of the tract, to the south along Adams Street. The Initial Study for the proposed project did not discover any significant impacts associated with the project. The development as proposed with the project will not have any significant growth -inducing impacts, as the site is partially developed with residential uses, in accordance with the previous tract approval for the overall site. However, the new development could accelerate further residential development in the area, which has already been designated and planned for in the General Plan. 13 The following findings can be made regarding the mandatory findings of significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines and based on the results of this environmental assessment: * The proposed residential tract map does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the project in question is proposed to complete the currently existing, previously approved residential units, and will not be developed in any manner which could substantially change existing conditions or generally approved land uses in the area, * The proposed residential tract map will not have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term goals, as the development proposed is the same project previously approved for the site and is consistent with residential uses already developed and in place on the site, * The proposed residential tract map will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed projects in the immediate vicinity, in that the development, whether approved or not, will have no measurable effect upon surrounding development as currently approved or permitted under the existing General Plan for the site, * The proposed residential tract map will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the development contemplates the same uses as those already assigned and approved as part of the La Quinta General Plan and previous tract 23773, and which were addressed in the Environmental Impact Report previously certified for the General Plan and the Negative Declaration previously adopted for EA 88-104; Tract 23773. A. Earlier Analyses Used. The following documents were used and/or referred to in the preparation of this assessment: • La Quinta General Plan Update; October 1992 • La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment; October 1992 • Final Environmental Impact Report; La Quinta General Plan Update, October 1992 • Cultural Resources Assessment for Tract 23773, refiled, August 1996 • Environmental Assessment 88-104, adopted March 21, 1988 These and various other documents on file with the Community Development Department were used in the preparation of this Initial Study. Bo Impacts Adequately Addressed. No potentially significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. The proposed development is within the scope of the La Quinta General Plan and the previous approval for tract 23773; effects identified as less than significant were addressed within the previous environmental documentation as indicated, or will be mitigated through incorporation of typical development conditions. 14 C. Mitigation Measures. No mitigation measures have been identified in this addendum beyond routine City requirements as applied to conditional approval of a given project. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has not been prepared, as the standard requirements were referred to in this addendum and will be incorporated into the conditions of approval for this tract. Prepared by: Wallace H. Nesbit Associate Planner Date: MEMORANDUM TO: Christine di Iorio, Planning Ma ager FROM: Steve Speer, Senior Engine DATE: September 23, 1996 RE: Tentative Tract 23773 Starlight Dunes Condition #12 of the proposed conditions of approval for the subject,tract allows the developer to utilize existing improvement plans that are already approved provided they comply with existing requirements. Pursuant to that provision it seems appropriate to revise the requirements found in Condition #14 by deleting the AutoCad requirement for improvement plans. As you know, the plans and maps for this tract have already been prepared; therefore, if the requirement is not revised it essentially requires the developer to produce new street plans because the existing street improvements plans which are already plan checked and approved were hand drawn. The AutoCad requirement has no adverse impact on the developer with regard to maps, however, as the maps already exist in AutoCad format. Proposed Revisions 14. VAiett firad plAam are approved, by the Gity, and prior to approval of the final map(s), the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the eem-approved plays map(s) on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu choices so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the shall update the files to refleet as eenstrtteted eenditions ineltding approved revisions to the plate Restated Condition 1 d. Pr�nr to approval of final map(s� the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files, of the approved map(s) on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu choices so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. off -site signs are proposed within a four -mile radius of the event. A large banner (100 sq. ft.) is proposed to be hung over Avenida Bermudas, a public street. Additional on -site vinyl signs (2' by 10' or 2' by 12') provide directional information for patrons at the venue. The signs and banners will have Navy Blue lettering on white backgrounds. Sign bunting is not proposed. Zoning Code Provisions Chapter 9.100.140 (Item 8) of the Zoning Code provides standards for examining temporary signs for Temporary Outdoor Events. The Zoning Code permits the following temporary advertising for an event such as the one proposed: A. One banner per street frontage not to exceed 32 sq. ft.; B. One portable on- or off -site sign not to exceed 55 sq. ft.; C. 30 off -site signs (i.e., directional signs); and, D. 15 bunting signs with size approved by the Community Development Director. The existing Code does not permit exceptions to the above provisions. Signs in the right- of-way under Item C, are limited to six square feet, but private property signs can be 12 sq. ft. with property owner approval according to Chapter 9.160 (Signs). Directional signs may not be placed within 100-feet of an intersection or 200-feet from another sign, and not interfere with traffic safety devices. CONCLUSION: The applicant was given a copy of the Zoning Code prior to preparation of their application submittal in August. The sign application meets the provision of the Zoning Code except for the large banner hung over Avenida Bermudas. This banner is not permitted under our new regulations. The City has allowed street banners if the event is held on a public street that the City Council has closed to through traffic (i.e., Mainstreet Marketplace Festival). Conditions are proposed that comply with the existing provisions of the Municipal Zoning Code. Findings for approval are included in the attached material. RECOMMENDATION: Adopted Minute Motion No. 96- , approving Sign Permit Application No. 96-356, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval as attached. Attachments: 1. Festival Site Plan 2. District Application Information 3. Various Sign Graphics PMTOE120-6A Prerpared by: � l Greg Trbusdell, Associate Planner Submitted by: Christine di lorio, lanning Manager PMTOE120-6A MINUTE MOTION NO.96- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 96-356 C.V.R.P.D. (OKTOBERFEST) SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 A. Temporary signs directing patrons to the event will be displayed throughout the community to help the public find this special event location. The signs will be placed so that they do not interfere with traffic safety signs or other important facilities (i.e., traffic signals, etc.). Sign removal will occur immediately after the event is over to guard against the signs becoming roadside debris or litter. CONDITIONS: Signs in the City right-of-way shall be mounted on minimum 2" by 2" wood posts unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. An encroachment permit shall be issued for any signs posted in the City rights -of -way. 2. No temporary signs shall be closer than 100-feet to an intersection. Temporary signs shall be posted no closer than 5' from the edge of the paved area of any public road or street and placed 200' from an identical sign. Signs in the right-of-way shall not exceed six square feet and signs on private property shall not exceed twelve square feet. Signs placed on private property shall be installed only if authorization from the private property owner has been secured prior to on -site installation. All signs shall be placed in a manner which does not obstruct traffic or street signs or other important equipment (Chapter 9.160.060 of the Sign Ordinance). All temporary directional signs may be installed 48 hours prior to the special event but must be removed by October 16, 1996. The porta-panel sign at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street may be installed on October 6, 1996, but shall be removed by October 19, 1996. The on -site informational banners and directional signs can be displayed during the Festival. 4. All Conditions imposed by the Community Development Department on August 28, 1996, for Minor Temporary Outdoor Event Permit No. 96-120 shall be met. The Community Development Department may impose additional Conditions, or revoke this permit, if any problems arise during the event that need special attention or consideration. 5. The banner planned to be hung over Avenida Bermudas shall not be used because it is located off -site and greater than 32 square feet. COND 120.4A 6. A bond in the amount of $1,000.00 shall be posted to insure that all off -site signs are removed after October 13, 1996. The security can be either a Certificate of Deposit or Letter of Credit naming the City as beneficiary of the account. COND 120.4A ATTACHMENTS FOR OKTOBERFEST ATTACH4-C U i 1 ?¢ i QZ 1 W LLI Y Q a W Ali m U Oa W m w 0z vg 0 Lu LU- Oi r J O V r r ..r_ r� ".. r .� r .r♦ a -' W a LL 1 ¢ Lr ® .- a a J=< G Z V 1 z v •� 0 m ai I zz a I < 1 w _ 0 0 � 1 z I ►- z �� 0 0 j'Iw ® WO m _ W WWa O 'Nonal ti339 a U a / O O / 0 0 COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT 45-871 CLINTON STREET - INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201 • (619) 347-3484 1 Proposal to City of LaQuinta 1996 Octoberfest The First Annual Octoberfest is a community oriented event hosted by the Coachella Valley Recreation & Park District and Schatzi's Grill in LaQuinta. The .purposed event will run one, three day weekend (Friday, Saturday and Sunday) at the LaQuinta Community Park and will feature an authentic German Band, German food and beer provided by Schatzi's Grill, vendor booths and a children's game and amusement area. The LaQuinta Chamber of Commerce has agreed to assist our efforts for securing vendors for the event and other miscellanous coordination efforts in a manpower capacity. It is the intent of Coachella Valley Recreation to get the vendors to commit to the entire three day event . The event is scheduled for October 11, 12 & 13, 1996. The requested hours are Friday 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday 12 noon to 11:00 p.m. The event will be held on the west side of the LaQuinta Park. The area will be completely enclosed by the ballfield fencing. There will be a tent set up from October 10 through October 13 with a stage, lighting, a dance floor, tables and chairs. Beer and Wine Sales will be outside the tent from Beer trucks. All vendors will have their designated booth space which they will have the option to leave set up throughout the weekend. Security will be provided overnight during the duration of the event. Captain Ron Dye of the LaQuinta Sheriffs Department has already been consulted on the sale and requirements of Alcohol for this event. Additional directional signs and promotional posters and banners will be displayed not only on the park property but throughout the City with Councils approval. The Coachella Valley Recreation & Park District has secured Waste Management of the Desert to provide all trash receptacles, port -a -potties, and recycle containers for the event. CITY OF LA QUINTA '�Ne&OT� ._ A446OMMEG14 3 i hway II CiTHal L a La Quinta 2 Cove w tAvenue 441 Avenue PGA West CASE MAP CAM Nm Airport Blvd. NORTN SCALE: nts Vicinity Map JL Qt ATTACHMENT "A" DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGaE LOCATIONS: Washington & Fred Waring Washington & Miles Avenue Hwy 111 & Jefferson Washington & Eisenhower Washington & Avenue 50 Washington & Avenue 52 Washington & Hwy 111 (NE corner) Washington & Hwy 111 (SW corner) Washington & Hwy 111 (INIW corner) Washington & Hwy 111 (SE corner) Jefferson & Avenue 50 Jefferson & Avenue 52 Jefferson & Avenue 54 Washington & Cane Tampico Calle Tampico & Bermudas Bermudas & Montez:uma LJ > IL IL SEP 1 2 1996 CITY OF LAGUINTA 1, PLAN NINC DFPAFITMFNT_' Signs .shall not: be paced closer than 12 feet from the curb line. H W UL m O Y O H z c� T :, MDJ ..oc CITY OF LA QUINTA CASE MAP CASE No. Vicinity Map ORTH, SCALE: nts 5't y ii' .SilN ,A COto W U9 -' W t z � W m �W > HAS O W 0) I Jim C C m Ar AVENIDA MONTEZUMA 0000 NORTH/ �Ao i------� / IT] F�l 4 \� �I M BOOTHSOe�FR M M I G GEC �- �1 v ENTRY;` I I I I � � I OVERFLOW DINNING --------_I i a DINNING AREA I V . J J TABLES ►�- �� AND CHAIRS I W . (FRI. 6 SAT. ONLY); � 1996 OCTOBERFEST Im a(SUNDAY) I COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION & P I w CHILDREN'S AREA 1 GAMES, CRAFTS, I FOOD PREP EMERGENCY EXIT :oioii V-4 0 U) C20 0 a- uj (D > L CL 0 4) > EO > 4) CL v ,a) 75 CL 0) CD c: :3 > c o a. M C: t V-4 4-a X W O r v m O E ® E o m a�w �ovm U � 0 E O �o t F-- C) O a)0. O ' a �_ ,ate N+-� ,J w ® CL L11 U N C m .y .- CL W = m (n Cl)Cl)a>' D Zo N CL m W C; .Q O E c� a c�a m a .; .. o m 8m8 mE®�. t N e- N ® > o O d W W Win. `- N m a� ®(L o W SV ao4) a a E... U u.,a U) L) % N a c� u In July, an application was submitted requesting approval of JazzART '96, a three-day event, scheduled to begin on November 8, 1996. The Foundation projects 4,000 people per day based on previous events. The applicant's program summary includes information about how they plan to accommodate their patrons and employees during the venue (Attachment 2). Also requested are on- and off -site signs for the event that include 29 off -site directional signs (3- to 6-square feet each) posted along various streets, an off -site portable billboard, and on -site banners (Attachment 3, Various Exhibits). All signs are proposed within a four -mile radius of the event. Public Agency Review Staff mailed a copy of the applicant's request to all public agencies on July 25, 1996, for response by August 9, 1996. Comments received have been incorporated into the attached draft Conditions of Approval. Zoning Code Update The City's new Zoning Code (Ordinance No. 284) is in effect. Chapter 9.100.140 establishes the provisions for Planning Commission approval of events that have gatherings of more than 300 people including spectators and participants, provided Findings and Conditions are met. These include health and safety provisions, parking, security, and traffic related mitigation measures. The Planning Commission also evaluates the signs needed to advertise the future event (i.e., Item 8 of Chapter 9.100.140). The Zoning Code permits the following temporary advertising for events of this type: A.. One banner per street frontage not to exceed 32 sq. ft.; B. One portable on- or off -site sign not to exceed 55 sq. ft.; C. 30 off -site signs (i.e., directional signs); and, D. 15 bunting signs. The Code does not permit exceptions to the above provisions. Signs in the public street right-of-way under Item C are limited to six square feet in size. Staff Comments The Foundation hires various contractors to assist them in their events from parking valets to Riverside County Sheriffs Deputies for security needs. Past events, previously approved by City staff, have been well run with no major problems arising. The Foundation is well known for their annual outdoor art events, and previously the Planning Commission approved the sign programs according to Section 5.64 of the Municipal Code. PMTOE126-6A CONCLUSION: Conditions are proposed that comply with the existing provisions of the Municipal Zoning Code. Findings for approval are included in the attached material. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 96- , approving the JazzART `96 Festival and signing for the November event, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval as attached. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Foundation Program 3. Sign Application PrppareA by: II, Associate Planner Submitted by: a n Auwa D . Christine di lorio, Planriing Manager PMTOE126-6A MINUTE MOTION NO.96- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TEMPORARY OUTDOOR EVENT PERMIT NO. 96-126 IAZZART `96 - LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 As required by Chapter 9.100.140 of the Zoning Code, findings for support of the project are as follows: The event will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community in the area of the proposed event. A. Various public agency permits are required prior to the event occurring ensuring that the event will be conducted in a professional manner. Health Department permits are required for all food and beverage vendors attending the event, and police and fire personnel will be on hand to assist the organizers in providing a safe environment for vehicles and patrons coming to the event. The City Engineer shall approve a traffic control plan, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit, which ensures that traffic barricades and other devices will be employed to guarantee safe traveling in the areas surrounding the park which can include street closures if authorized by the City Council through separate action. Additionally, fire lanes and other permits are required by the Fire Marshal for the operator and vendors per State statutes. The public roadways providing access to the event are capable to support the local patrons because they are two and four -lane improved thoroughfares that provide access from Highway 111 to the site (e.g., Washington Street, Eisenhower Drive, Calle Tampico, etc.). The Foundation is aware of these rules and regulations since they have held many venues at this site in past years. No problems are anticipated which would be detrimental to the community based on the recommended conditions. B. This project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the outdoor festival is a temporary use in a publicly owned park designed for public use per Section 15311 (Class 11). C. Temporary signs directing patrons to the event will be displayed throughout the community to help the public find this special event location. The signs will be placed so that they do not interfere with traffic safety signs or other facilities (i.e., traffic signals, etc.). Sign removal will occur immediately after the event is over to guard against the signs becoming roadside debris or litter. COND126.4A 2. There is adequate area to conduct the event and to accommodate the anticipated attendance. A. This community -sponsored event is held in an adequately designed facility which can hold the daily patrons because various facilities will be provided such as restrooms, first -aid station, food and beverages, parking, and other facilities which provide services to those paying to attend the daily activities. The park site has existing buildings (restrooms) and landscaping facilities which complements the other temporary improvements planned by the La Quinta Arts Foundation. The Foundation has held this outdoor event in the park for a number of years and have not created an undue burden on the nearby property or business owners by their activities. Guest parking areas will be provided around the park, and in adjoining areas, with proper authorization. Private property owners who are in the area and do not wish to participate in the event shall have their properties roped off by the event organizer to ensure patrons do not park on these unauthorized sites. Wc� 1. The hours of operation for the three-day event (November 8-10, 1996) shall be between 10:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. daily. 2. A building inspection is required for temporary electric power. Please contact the Building and Safety Department to schedule an inspection (777-7012) prior to the start of the event. 3. A fire inspection is required for temporary structures (tents, etc.) or any open flame devices by the Riverside County Fire Department before installation and use. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Tom Hutchison, Fire Safety Specialist, at 863-8886. Fire lanes shall be established and maintained during the special event. 4. Portable restrooms shall be provided for patrons and vendors as required by the Building and Safety Department. Restroom facilities to accommodate the physically challenged shall also be provided. 5. Temporary trash receptacles shall be provided so that trash/debris can be deposited accordingly. The site shall be left clean of any litter at the close of the event. 6. Signs in the City right-of-way shall be mounted on minimum 2" by 2" wood posts and no signs shall be closer than 100-feet from an intersection. Temporary signs shall be posted no closer than 5' from the edge of the paved area of any public road or street and placed a minimum of 200' from an identical sign. Signs in the right-of-way shall not exceed 6 square feet and signs on private property shall not exceed 12 square feet. Signs placed on private property shall be installed only if authorization has been secured prior to on -site installation. All signs shall be placed in a manner which does not obstruct traffic or street signs or other important equipment (Chapter 9.160.060 of the Sign Ordinance). All temporary directional COND126-4A signs shall be removed by November 12, 1996, except for the porta-panel sign at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street which shall be removed by November 16, 1996. 7. Before the outdoor event begins (no later than seven days in advance), notice to the existing property owners and businesses around the Frances Hack Park shall be given informing them of the upcoming special event. 8. Vendors who sell or serve alcoholic beverages shall obtain a license from the State of California Alcoholic Beverage Control Department. 9. Riverside County Sheriff's Deputies shall be on -site during the event to provide security and traffic control supervision. 10. Food vendors shall be reviewed and approved for operation by the Riverside County Health Department, as required. They can be reached by calling 863-7000. All vendors shall also obtain a City Business License. 11. The applicant shall work with Waste Management of the Desert to recycle the aluminum cans disposed in the temporary trash receptacles during the outdoor art festival. 12. If ground excavation is required, please contact Underground Service Alert (USA) at 1-800- 422-4144. The service is free of charge provided USA is given at least two days' notice. 13. Before any cranes, forklifts, or other aerial equipment is raised, please check for existing overhead wires. 14. Proof of Liability Insurance naming the City, and its staff, as additionally insured during the outdoor event in the amount of $1,000,000.00 shall be received on or before November 1, 1996. 15. If public streets are to be closed for this special event, City Council approval is required. Upon approval by the Council, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department before closure or obstruction of any roadway or placement of any signs, barricades or other advertising or traffic control devices in the street right-of-way. 16. For road closures or obstructions, the applicant shall be responsible for installation, maintenance and removal of traffic control devices required in the approved traffic control plan. 17. The applicant may request that the Public Works Department furnish traffic control devices necessary for permitted road closures or obstructions. The Public Works Department may require that the applicant pay a fee or otherwise reimburse the costs of furnishing the devices. COND126-4A 18. No parking shall occur on private property unless the Foundation has obtained written authorization. All vacant parcels surrounding the Frances Hack Park shall be cordoned off (i.e., by using rope, logs or other devices) to ensure no parking occurs unless permitted in advance by the property owner. 19. Night lighting must be adequate to permit patrons proper visibility within the exhibition and food areas. 20. All designated private security personnel must possess a current Private Security Guard license by the State of California. 21. No overnight camping is allowed. Site exhibitors will find overnight lodging at local hotels or RV campgrounds while the outdoor fair is occurring. Exhibitors or food vendors may leave their vehicles or equipment at the park provided the La Quinta Arts Foundation provides overnight security. 22. The Community Development Department may impose additional Conditions, or revoke this permit, if any problems arise during the event that need special attention or consideration. 23. Proper egress and ingress shall be provided at all times for patrons and vehicular traffic to the outdoor event. 24. A bond in the amount of $10,000.00 shall be posted to insure that the site is cleaned of litter and all signs are removed from their on- and off -site locations. The security can be either a Certificate of Deposit or Letter of Credit naming the City as beneficiary of the account. COND126-4A ATTACHMENTS FOR JAZZART 1996 FORMS Attachment 1 lb DATE: July 23, 1996 Attachment 2 TO: Mr. Tom Hartung, Building and Safety Director BY: Susan Francis, Festival Director La Quinta Arts Foundation SUBJECT: Permit to hold a minor outdoor event in La Quinta DATE OF EVENT: November 8, 9, 10, 1996 LA QUINTA RTS FOUNDATION La Quinta Arts Foundation requests a permit to hold a "minor outdoor event" within the city limits of La Quinta on November 8, 9, 10, 1996. This event, JazzART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Arts, will be conducted in compliance with Chapter 9.216 (#348 Riverside County Land Use Ordinance XIXa), "Temporary Outdoor Events." The anticipated attendance at the show is not expected to exceed 900 at any given time. The three-day event will be open to the public daily from 10:00 a.m. until approximately 6:00 p.m. Artists and volunteers will arrive on November 7, 1996 to set up displays but these numbers will not exceed 150. JazzART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Arts will be held on the grounds of La Quinta Community Park, located at 77-865 Montezuma Avenue, La Quinta. Permission has been requested to hold the show on this site from the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District, the agency with jurisdiction over the park. The attached plot plan indicates: a) the area in which the displays will be exhibited; b) artist and patron parking areas; c) placement of sanitation facilities. ADEQUATE AREA TO CONDUCT THE EVENT: The grounds consist of the west half of the park including the ballfield. Approximately 140 artists will display their work, and foot traffic will be on existing sidewalks and the grass between the displays. The public will be admitted through one gate located in the middle of the north/south fence located in the proximity of the existing scoreboard. PARKING: Parking for artists will be located to the southwest of the park on the land owned by Rupert Yessayian. Public parking will be on the property owned by Eddy Nicholson bordered by the streets of Tampico, Bermudas and La Fonda, on the property owned by City of La Quinta on Navarro and Montezuma and possibly on the property owned by Bill Martin to the north of Tampico. Permission from all property owners will be sought. Professional attendants will assist the public in parking. FOOD SERVICE: Food and beverage services will be provided to the public from outside professional purveyors who will prepare food or beverages according to Health Department Standards. ;WINE TASTING: Wine tasting will be provided to the public by various California vintners and will comply with Health Department standards as well as rules and regulations set by California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. POST OFFICE SOX 777 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (619) 564-1244 FAX (619) 564-6884 FIRST AID STATIONS: La Quinta Fire Department will be asked to provide standby first aid response. Ambulance access will be maintained and the entire facility and parking will have identifiable locations plotted on a grid for easy location of emergency sites. This will be communicated to all security and safety personnel. FIRE PROTECTION: One 2A10BC fire extinguisher will be installed in each food area. Fire exits are one twenty -foot gated opening and four -six foot gated openings in the fence around the show site. The gridded plot map will be utilized by fire control personnel. SANITATION FACILITIES: We will arrange for portolets to be brought in by Waste Management of the Desert. POTABLE WATER: Two drinking fountains are located on the premises. Drinking water will be available at no cost from food and beverage vendors. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: Six large, covered, trash containers are permanently located on the premises. La Quinta Arts Foundation will supply additional trash containers. Food and beverage vendors will be required to supply additional receptacles. La Quinta Arts Foundation will see to the daily transfer of refuse to proper containers on site. SECURITY OPERATION: Security for the event will be a joint effort involving the Riverside County Sheriffs Department, the City of La Quinta and a professional security service. A private guard will patrol the premises at all times commencing at 6:00 p.m. on November 5th and continuing until8:00 a.m. on November llth. SITE RESTORATION: The site will be cleaned and restored to its original condition or better at the conclusion of the event. The staff and board of the Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District and the City staff will be encouraged to inspect the grounds subsequent to the event. CAMPING: Exhibitors in recreational vehicles will not be permitted to camp overnight in the parking lots nor on adjacent city streets. A list of alternative campsites has been made available to exhibitors. (See attached listing.) PERMISSION TO SERVE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES: We request permission to serve beer and wine within the fenced show area. A temporary daily permit to sell beer and wine will be acquired from the Alcoholic Beverage Control and a copy of the licensing will be available. The wine will be purchased by scrip. Scrip drink tickets will be sold by La Quinta Arts Foundation who will check that each purchaser is over 21 years of age. Alcohol consumption will take place within the fenced show area only. We will obtain permission from Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District for the sale of beer and wine at this year's event. In past years we have offered beer and wine at our two annual events and we have never had an incidence of public intoxication or damage to property as a result of alcohol consumption. On behalf of La Quinta Arts Foundation, we respectfully request that the City Council of La Quinta grant a permit to conduct JazzART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Arts. 07 usan rancis Heidi ils Festival Director Executive Director 9-06-1996 9:18Ah1 FPOM LOAF 619 564 6884 P 2 Attachment 3 July 23, 1996 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS We request that the City of La Quinta authorize placement of signs to promote JazzART96 - La Quinta Fail Festival of the Arts, a community event, according to the attached map and descriptions. The directional signs which are painted on MDO plywood will be set in place October 28th and will taken down by November 22nd. TEMPORARY PORTA-PANEL We are requesting approval from the City of La Quinta to place a portable billboard on the southeast corner of the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street for approximately two weeks prior to and during the event weekend --November 8, 9, 10. 1996. The billboard will be used to advertise this special event and to direct people traveling on Highway 111 to turn south on Washington toward the City of La Quinta. Please see attached map for requested sign placement. This portable sign, to be provided by a professional outdoor sign company, is of high quality with professional artwork and lettering similar in quality to those signs used to promote the Bob Hope Classic. The sign will show La Quinta Arts Foundation logo, will contain the words "Jazz.ART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Arts --November 8, 9, 10--La Quinta Community Park", and will show a directional arrow. BANNERS We request permission to hang two banners (2' x IT) by rope across the east end and across the west end attached by rope from the palm trees. The banners will he set in place November I and removed November 11. Banners are blue, professionally lettered and say "Art Show -- This Weekend". Thank you. LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION �-7 Susan Francis Festival Director SEC OVE SEP 0 6 1996 CITY OF LAQUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT V re� t^/cri�s Miles m T�mP. r, Port -a Panel MI CJ @ C Ave- sz c L Duran3c 9-86-1996 9:2EAM FROM L06F 619 564 6884 P.4 Oi Of I m l +' 07 CA a+ ! •• =A IID , • ID ., u r Of ID ID 107 ai rw+ir Cr of ID •1. •Y�n •0@.r (•d M G) f6 W Q� ID a7 W I O W Q1 •r b I •— 4. 4 a. N ' 4 � li ID W 07 CAI tli + O ! 16 1.. .— . �. 1 1� t0 V t6 !0 <0 V Y.. I \. l6 O �0 ►i. �, �. Q N NIN • I N W I NtqI N I I y N NNN NIN` Vi 6J.i z z Z WIZ R: I tdJ ,$ I Ln f W y U7 WIN Z' 2 I Z I �"?. I W W LU i II Z Z I LU I Z ! Z W W I LU I , Lii ? Lii W w Lu ui U; .; i Z ZIZ N ZIZ Z ZIiZI2IZlcl�,VIIZ N Z Z 2iiZ'21Z L' N NIN N N N N' IN NiN NIN N'N N ` I I, N NIN N N N N X [WV N X X �- N N X N XIM cV y( 7K cV X fglX X' N N X�X NIN X X XIX N N!N�N X N lDfthlM�M X X XI X M XI' X N XXIx N NV N X�X cv N X cv r � � t•• N P P , N P PIP P P !� I P !� N N i N N I N� P j P P I !" P 11P' r I 1 o�CI C� 4 j I 147 ID y N C li� tt� O .a W ,.. o2S ei! I r EEC a Oi rn O.. , UJ Q I, I { l ��Iolro1�polaso U c c; f � UI313 c m mIG m O l �'�iC_�I�, O d Z I S 10 ] Q >I� Q � d s liII ll?e�ZS t Ci ly O 0 0 C �O+ O i..oWom O N y O O V Gl G G ,Fvr-o d'I -mm� li�m 1i1I�moG3 w w_ccv�.� recNZvf _c .c to QGI � 31cyr1mwwio I eCC� d,�S f� LCM >c� 1�trncvt0 mm ►-A A 0crGwOS' 1a0C37 If3:AAAAA� l 5 .5 w «Or 0 c ; 0 `r R 7 ! 7� > � D to O'NlidfNIv to tL! 11!! tt! lii Q tt! OIO�ti; to O Of C" 7 3 `' b :2 L U, ID L IDN L Ln O L O ai ® `�Elailvlaila+ ti�m a+ ,E,E N E a;' o cyai� d N u .g!= = z1W > Q Q F-'►- d d d > ? 4 d > d d I-- m'm DIf- �SIQ } } I 1 LnIm 1 1 N co, O '- P N .. M - d LA -�.-I.- 4O n OD W O l P N M .- NVN�NICN i eh l LO 'I IN Co N n l w ID NIN N (j (j t C > CD t GO o L C O s fl- fib• �-b ��vr��,�t� DESCRIPTION: Signs are produced by a professional outdoor sign company using white letters on blue background and say `.Arts Festival" with foundation logo and directional arrows. Detail of description of signs 6,9,18,19,20,21 and 22: #6 La Quinta Arts Festival - Stay on Washington (2' x 3' placed on Washington and Eisenhower) #9 Festival Parking (2' x 3' placed on Washington and Tampico) #18 Festival Parking (2' x T placed on Eisenhower and Tampico) #19 Free Parking Valet Parking (face west on Tampico and Bermudas) #20 Valet Parking (2' x 3' face east on Tampico and Bermudas) #21 Free Parking Valet Parking (2' x 3' on Desert Club and Tampico) #22 La Quinta Arts Festival (2' x 3' on Highway 111 by Golf Shop) [�C `EDVE SEP 0 6 1996 CITY OF LAQUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT £ ' d VeS9 V95 6 L 9 JV07 Hods "V6 L ' 6 966 L -90-6 Business Item # STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CASE NO.: TEMPORARY OUTDOOR EVENT PERMIT NO. 96-126 REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A THREE-DAY OUTDOOR EVENT (JAZZART `96) AND SIGN PROGRAM TO BE HELD AT THE FRANCES HACK PARK FOR NOVEMBER 8-10, 1996, ACCORDING TO PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 9.100.140 LOCATION: 77-865 AVENIDA MONTEZUMA (ATTACHMENT 1) APPLICANT: LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION (MS. SUSAN FRANCES) PROPERTY OWNER: RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA BECAUSE THE OUTDOOR FESTIVAL IS A TEMPORARY USE IN A PUBLICLY OWNED PARK DESIGNED FOR PUBLIC USE PER SECTION 15311 (CLASS 11). GENERAL PLAN: PARK FACILITIES ZONING: PARKS AND RECREATION BACKGROUND: Site Background The La Quinta Arts Foundation has been holding outdoor art festivals in the Frances Hack Park for many years. The park is surrounded by vacant parcels and commercial businesses which are designated Village Park by the Municipal Zoning Code and Specific Plan 87-009. PMTOE126-6A CONCLUSION: Conditions are proposed that comply with the existing provisions of the Municipal Zoning Code. Findings for approval are included in the attached material. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 96- , approving the JazzART `96 Festival and signing for the November event, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval as attached. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Foundation Program 3. Sign Application Prepared by: ,i Greg'Trousdell, Associate Planner Submitted by: Christine di lorio, Planning Manager PMTOE126-6A MINUTE MOTION NO.96- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TEMPORARY OUTDOOR EVENT PERMIT NO. 96-126 JAZZART `96 - LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 1► 1 1" As required by Chapter 9.100.140 of the Zoning Code, findings for support of the project are as follows: The event will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community in the area of the proposed event. A. Various public agency permits are required prior to the event occurring ensuring that the event will be conducted in a professional manner. Health Department permits are required for all food and beverage vendors attending the event, and police and fire personnel will be on hand to assist the organizers in providing a safe environment for vehicles and patrons coming to the event. The City Engineer shall approve a traffic control plan, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit, which ensures that traffic barricades and other devices will be employed to guarantee safe traveling in the areas surrounding the park which can include street closures if authorized by the City Council through separate action. Additionally, fire lanes and other permits are required by the Fire Marshal for the operator and vendors per State statutes. The public roadways providing access to the event are capable to support the local patrons because they are two and four -lane improved thoroughfares that provide access from Highway 111 to the site (e.g., Washington Street, Eisenhower Drive, Calle Tampico, etc.). The Foundation is aware of these rules and regulations since they have held many venues at this site in past years. No problems are anticipated which would be detrimental to the community based on the recommended conditions. B. This project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the outdoor festival is a temporary use in a publicly owned park designed for public use per Section 15311 (Class 11). C. Temporary signs directing patrons to the event will be displayed throughout the community to help the public find this special event location. The signs will be placed so that they do not interfere with traffic safety signs or other facilities (i.e., traffic signals, etc.). Sign removal will occur immediately after the event is over to guard against the signs becoming roadside debris or litter. COND126.4A 2. There is adequate area to conduct the event and to accommodate the anticipated attendance. A. This community -sponsored event is held in an adequately designed facility which can hold the daily patrons because various facilities will be provided such as restrooms, first -aid station, food and beverages, parking, and other facilities which provide services to those paying to attend the daily activities. The park site has existing buildings (restrooms) and landscaping facilities which complements the other temporary improvements planned by the La Quinta Arts Foundation. The Foundation has held this outdoor event in the park for a number of years and have not created an undue burden on the nearby property or business owners by their activities. Guest parking areas will be provided around the park, and in adjoining areas, with proper authorization. Private property owners who are in the area and do not wish to participate in the event shall have their properties roped off by the event organizer to ensure patrons do not park on these unauthorized sites. �- 1 111010154 The hours of operation for the three-day event (November 8-10, 1996) shall be between 10:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. daily. 2. A building inspection is required for temporary electric power. Please contact the Building and Safety Department to schedule an inspection (777-7012) prior to the start of the event. 3. A fire inspection is required for temporary structures (tents, etc.) or any open flame devices by the Riverside County Fire Department before installation and use. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Tom Hutchison, Fire Safety Specialist, at 863-8886. Fire lanes shall be established and maintained during the special event. 4. Portable restrooms shall be provided for patrons and vendors as required by the Building and Safety Department. Restroom facilities to accommodate the physically challenged shall also be provided. 5. Temporary trash receptacles shall be provided so that trash/debris can be deposited accordingly. The site shall be left clean of any litter at the close of the event. 6. Signs in the City right-of-way shall be mounted on minimum 2" by 2" wood posts and no signs shall be closer than 100-feet from an intersection. Temporary signs shall be posted no closer than 5' from the edge of the paved area of any public road or street and placed a minimum of 200' from an identical sign. Signs in the right-of-way shall not exceed 6 square feet and signs on private property shall not exceed 12 square feet. Signs placed on private property shall be installed only if authorization has been secured prior to on -site installation. All signs shall be placed in a manner which does not obstruct traffic or street signs or other important equipment (Chapter 9.160.060 of the Sign Ordinance). All temporary directional COND126-4A signs shall be removed by November 12, 1996, except for the porta-panel sign at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street which shall be removed by November 16, 1996. 7. Before the outdoor event begins (no later than seven days in advance), notice to the existing property owners and businesses around the Frances Hack Park shall be given informing them of the upcoming special event. 8. Vendors who sell or serve alcoholic beverages shall obtain a license from the State of California Alcoholic Beverage Control Department. 9. Riverside County Sheriffs Deputies shall be on -site during the event to provide security and traffic control supervision. 10. Food vendors shall be reviewed and approved for operation by the Riverside County Health Department, as required. They can be reached by calling 863-7000. All vendors shall also obtain a City Business License. 11. The applicant shall work with Waste Management of the Desert to recycle the aluminum cans disposed in the temporary trash receptacles during the outdoor art festival. 12. If ground excavation is required, please contact Underground Service Alert (USA) at 1-800- 422-4144. The service is free of charge provided USA is given at least two days' notice. 13. Before any cranes, forklifts, or other aerial equipment is raised, please check for existing overhead wires. 14. Proof of Liability Insurance naming the City, and its staff, as additionally insured during the outdoor event in the amount of $1,000,000.00 shall be received on or before November 1, 1996. 15. If public streets are to be closed for this special event, City Council approval is required. Upon approval by the Council, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department before closure or obstruction of any roadway or placement of any signs, barricades or other advertising or traffic control devices in the street right-of-way. 16. For road closures or obstructions, the applicant shall be responsible for installation, maintenance and removal of traffic control devices required in the approved traffic control plan. 17. The applicant may request that the Public Works Department furnish traffic control devices necessary for permitted road closures or obstructions. The Public Works Department may require that the applicant pay a fee or otherwise reimburse the costs of furnishing the devices. COND126-4A 18. No parking shall occur on private property unless the Foundation has obtained written authorization. All vacant parcels surrounding the Frances Hack Park shall be cordoned off (i.e., by using rope, logs or other devices) to ensure no parking occurs unless permitted in advance by the property owner. 19. Night lighting must: be adequate to permit patrons proper visibility within the exhibition and food areas. 20. All designated private security personnel must possess a current Private Security Guard license by the State of California. 21. No overnight camping is allowed. Site exhibitors will find overnight lodging at local hotels or RV campgrounds while the outdoor fair is occurring. Exhibitors or food vendors may leave their vehicles or equipment at the park provided the La Quinta Arts Foundation provides overnight security. 22. The Community Development Department may impose additional Conditions, or revoke this permit, if any problems arise during the event that need special attention or consideration. 23. Proper egress and ingress shall be provided at all times for patrons and vehicular traffic to the outdoor event. 24. A bond in the amount of $10,000.00 shall be posted to insure that the site is cleaned of litter and all signs are removed from their on- and off -site locations. The security can be either a Certificate of Deposit or Letter of Credit naming the City as beneficiary of the account. COND126-4A ATTACHMENTS FOR JAZZART 1996 FORMS OAF WLLI z Z • L� DATE: July 23, 1.396 Attachment 2 TO: Mr. Tom Hartung, Building and Safety Director BY: Susan Francis, Festival Director La Quinta Arts Foundation SUBJECT: Permit to hold a minor outdoor event in La Quinta DATE OF EVENT: November 8, 9, 10, 1996 AA QUINTA RTS FOUNDATION La Quinta Arts Foundation requests a permit to hold a "minor outdoor event" within the city limits of La Quinta on November 8, 9, 10, 1996. This event, JazzART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Arts, will be conducted in compliance with Chapter 9.216 (#348 Riverside County Land Use Ordinance XIXa), "Temporary Outdoor Events." The anticipated attendance at the show is not expected to exceed 900 at any given time. The three-day event will be open to the public daily from 10:00 a.m. until approximately 6:00 p.m. Artists and volunteers will arrive on November 7, 1996 to set up displays but these numbers will not exceed 150. JazzART96 - La Quinta, Fall Festival of the Arts will be held on the grounds of La Quinta Community Park, located at 77-865 Montezuma Avenue, La Quinta. Permission has been requested to hold the show on this site from the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District, the agency with jurisdiction over the park. The attached plot plan indicates: a) the area in which the displays will be exhibited; b) artist and patron parking areas; c) placement of sanitation facilities. ADEQUATE AREA TO CONDUCT THE EVENT: The grounds consist of the west half of the park including the ballfield. Approximately 140 artists will display their work, and foot traffic will be on existing sidewalks and the grass between the displays. The public will be admitted through one gate located in the middle of the north/south fence located in the proximity of the existing scoreboard. PARKING: Parking for artists will be located to the southwest of the park on the land owned by Rupert Yessayian. Public parking will be on the property owned by Eddy Nicholson bordered by the streets of Tampico, Bermudas and La Fonda, on the property owned by City of La Quinta on Navarro and Montezuma and possibly on the property owned by Bill Martin to the north of Tampico. Permission from all property owners will be sought. Professional attendants will assist the public in parking. FOOD SERVICE: Food, and beverage services will be provided to the public from outside professional purveyors who will prepare food or beverages according to Health Department Standards. WINE TASTING: Wine tasting will be provided to the public by various California vintners and will comply with Health Department standards as well as rules and regulations set by California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. POST OFFICE BOX 777 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (619) 564-1244 FAX (619) 564-6884 FIRST AID STATIONS: La Quinta Fire Department will be asked to provide standby first aid response. Ambulance access will be maintained and the entire facility and parking will have identifiable locations plotted on a grid for easy location of emergency sites. This will be communicated to all security and safety personnel. FIRE PROTECTION: One 2A10BC fire extinguisher will be installed in each food area. Fire exits are one twenty -foot gated opening and four -six foot gated openings in the fence around the show site. The gridded plot map will be utilized by fire control personnel. SANITATION FACILITIES: We will arrange for portolets to be brought in by Waste Management of the Desert. POTABLE WATER: Two drinking fountains are located on the premises. Drinking water will be available at no cost from food and beverage vendors. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL: Six large, covered, trash containers are permanently located on the premises. La Quinta Arts Foundation will supply additional trash containers. Food and beverage vendors will be required to supply additional receptacles. La Quinta Arts Foundation will see to the daily transfer of refuse to proper containers on site. SECURITY OPERATION: Security for the event will be a joint effort involving the Riverside County Sheriffs Department, the City of La Quinta and a professional security service. A private guard will patrol the premises at all times commencing at 6:00 p.m. on November 5th and continuing until 8:00 a.m. on November llth. SITE RESTORATION: The site will be cleaned and restored to its original condition or better at the conclusion of the event. The staff and board of the Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks ]District and the City staff will be encouraged to inspect the grounds subsequent to the event. CAMPING: Exhibitors :in recreational vehicles will not be permitted to camp overnight in the parking lots nor on adjacent city streets. A list of alternative campsites has been made available to exhibitors. (See attached listing) PERMISSION TO SERVE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES: We request permission to serve beer and wine within the fenced show area. A temporary daily permit to sell beer and wine will be acquired from the Alcoholic Beverage Control and a copy of the licensing will be available. The wine will be purchased by scrip. Scrip drink tickets will be sold by La Quinta Arts Foundation who will check that each purchaser is over 21 years of age. Alcohol consumption will take place within the fenced show area only. We will obtain permission from Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District for the sale of beer and wine at this year's event. In past years we have offered beer and wine at our two annual events and we have never had an incidence of public intoxication or damage to property as a result of alcohol consumption. On behalf of La Quinta Arts Foundation, we respectfully request that the City Council of La Quinta grant a permit to conduct JazzART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Arts. usan Francis Heidi ils6n Festival Director Executive Director 9-06-1996 9:18AM FROM LOAF 619 504 6884 P 2 Attachment 3 July 23, 1996 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS We request that the City of La Quinta authorize placement of signs to promote JazzART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Ants, a community event, according to the attached map and descriptions. The directional signs which are painted on MDO plywood will be set in place October 28th and will taken down by November 22nd. TEMPORARY ]PORTA-PANEL We are requesting approval from the City of La Quinta to place a portable billboard on the southeast corner of the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street for approximately two weeks prior to and during the event weekend --November 8, 9, 10. 1996- The billboard will be used to advertise this special event and to direct people traveling on Highway I11 to turn south on Washington toward the City of La Quinta. Please see attached map for requested sign placement. This portable sign, to be provided by a professional outdoor sign company, is of high quality with professional artwork and lettering similar in quality to those signs used to promote the Bob Hope Classic. The sign will show La Quinta Arts Foundation logo, will contain the words "Jaz2 ART96 - La Quinta Fall Festival of the Arts --November 8, 9, 10--La Quinta Community Park", and will show a directional arrow. BANNERS We request permission, to hang two banners (2' x 16) by rope across the east end and across the west end attached by rope from the palm trees. The banners will be set in place November 1 and removed November 11. Banners are blue, professionally lettered and say "Art Show -- This Weekend". Thank you. LA QUIN7CA ARTS FOUNDATION 0 �-7 Susan Francis Festival Director ECEME SEP 0 6 1996 J CITY OF LAQUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT `"y /000 Miles m � Temp. Porta Panel 17 Ave. 0 • ® L 8 3 o s� c c lu OF, L 18 ®� Tmpieo ©, ® c� s as Ave 52. < t� ®uran3c 9-06-1996 9:20AM FROM LOAF 619 564 6884 P. 4 rrrrr7�� ilz ii .� l6 1 y Q7 � W ` W G1 'i -O�, O { 071 W G7 j W Ql O) W W I L771 pi N 116 .� to '.� I <0 /C W •t0 Q N NV1 ly y y ty, N jN� Vf y�UfIV7 : y:�«N H tat I I I �i z,!ziz 3 W zl w,ljz rntW cni(niU.) W z z ZI�j;iAJ'Yd w �,z,iuiEz zIW W Zluiui ua!ui!7zlzlz z�z'z (Az,zlZ zlzjzl�lvi cra z�uj z z z,l J !' j I { I. NIIViN N Ni_ N N' N NiNiNI'N N N ��f �� N NININ NiN h W X I X X X X'M X X m X;K X X X,X X �iMIC�;lhll7 X X X!X XIX X �N/� NININ N NIX N NIX N NiN N N N�N N X K XIXIX N ZN •- '- �-',N r �'INIr Pr r r'r,r r N NINININir{rjrrr r,rr r e-� � w• r� w r r l I � r�r- ! I �O'clic o OA ' i � i i Sif LU O U V' �►+ � a f �,tC,ttiiW LO LO 'o Q olo o: v;3 3'pc p�' yI''ti d Q Q 0'0i0 CIZw pG -0 01 ¢� Q p 7 c0 GIG G Q Q to <A Hl 1p g E elm, d{ml W Ccaile�ro!a�la�Icic E E R Q� W W W W r m l O O w W I W m W co -- 0 0 Q Q '; Q 0 ga 0;ov:.6 06 a3iao146 016 06I06 N m '� 'n « .O.I� 0i *I W 4 a. OQ®Ndly {; a:I�OO ulIa+Oai Ca+ un U-) 1 LCYin a,;►� .5p .yg'2 2 �ai t��Ve1 Q Q Q i-{oo'00!Qlf-11 �SIQ 'Q iu � � li I �� I I �r ;j N M 'd- 4l) �O fr Ca O! O P N m j�? u7 (O f, w m UIJ ! CD N co i rn .- .- N �� N N N N' N N N N �V y ! { I S �� w G. m c'n Ir n rI� cm < w L� LJ Q O o U) C) Q J fib• �_� ��r,��,��% DESCRIPTION: Signs are produced by a professional outdoor sign company using white letters on blue background and say `.Arts Festival" with foundation logo and directional arrows. Detail of description of signs 6,9,18,19,20,21 and 22: #6 La Quinta .Arts Festival - Stay on Washington (2' x 3' placed on Washington and Eisenhower) #9 Festival Parking (2' x 3' placed on Washington and Tampico) #18 Festival Parking (2' x 3' placed on Eisenhower and Tampico) #19 Free Parking Valet Parking (face west on Tampico and Bermudas) #20 Valet Parking (2' x 3' face east on Tampico and Bermudas) #21 Free Parking Valet Parking (2' x 3' on Desert Club and Tampico) #22 La Quinta arts Festival (2' x 3' on Highway 111 by Golf Shop) z, Ifs � �UII SEP D 6 W6 U CITY OF 1_AQUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT £ d r889 P95 619 AVOW WObzi HV61:6 9661-90-6 BI #3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 CASE NO.: PLOT PLAN 94-543 APPLICANT: SESAME RESTAURANT (ALI BABA FARZANEH) REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A MINOR AMENDMENT TO ALLOW A WROUGHT IRON FENCE AROUND OUTDOOR SEATING AREA FOR SESAME RESTAURANT IN THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATION: NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO (ATTACHMENT 1) GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: N/C (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) ZONING: CN (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WAS APPROVED FOR THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER (PLOT PLAN 91-456) DURING THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL IN 1991. THIS NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSED THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. SINCE THE MODIFICATION IS A MINOR CHANGE, NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION IS DEEMED NECESSARY. BACKGROUND: Sesame Restaurant which recently opened, has an outdoor seating area on the south side of the restaurant facing the retention basin and Calle Tampico. Presently this area in unenclosed. Requested Modification The restaurant operator is asking approval to fence in the outdoor seating area with a wrought iron style fence. The applicant states that the reason he wishes to do this is to provide a sense of enclosure for the outdoor seating area and to provide security for tables and chairs which are left outside. The applicant has indicated that, although chained down, he has had several tables and chairs stolen from the patio area. PCSS.210 The applicant proposes to generally follow the current concrete patio area for the boundaries of the fence. The fence would be; attached to the building at the southeast corner and follow the patio area towards the southwest. The fence would be located on the stucco ledge of the fountain which separates it from the planter areas adjacent to the patio. At the west end of the patio the fence would follow the rounded boundaries of the patio and trellis and attach to the building at the southwest corner. Gates at the east and west end would provide access out of the area. Additional access would be provided into the building in its current location. . The top of the fence would vary in height from six -foot -six -inches to five feet above the patio slab and be provided in an "arch" style. The pickets would be spaced approximately four to six inches apart and provided with two-inch by two-inch posts as necessary. Between every fifth picket, an ornate "European" design will be provided between the pickets. The tops of the pickets will have an "arrow" top while the posts which will be two inches by two inches square will be provided with a "ball" top (Attachment 2'1. The maximum height of the fence above the patio slab will be constant and therefore, the actual height of fence on top of the fountain wall will be shorter than that adjacent to the patio slab. The owner indicates that the fence will be painted light beige or tan to match the light colored stucco used in the building. ANALYSIS: The change proposed to the exterior patio area is relatively minor. The design of the fence will be compatible with the existing building and shopping center. Provided the owners of the shopping center approve the fence, this request is acceptable. RECOMMENDATION[ By Minute Motion 96- _ approve the request for an exterior fence, with the provision that the final plans be reviewed by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Plan Exhibits Prepared by: STAN B. SAWA, Principal Planner Submitted by: CHRISTINE DI IORIO, Planning Manager PCSS.210 Wr A MST iM J� ow "m orw " ATTACHMENT 1 C i I nov ♦ W Y. Nov %M av _ KALP4t; ///je r , Ir Hu Im emu UAW= s a. � ._.J - � ao •r � • r r• ' rOb • CASE MAP CASE"° PLOT PLAN 94-543 SESAME'S 2 il NORTH SCALE: NTS '007 4 -rYfag 'fir BOB'S GATES,luc. P� �t �osi sa2E — zxz'-' P.O. Box 3M WE ,�� -�M LcDt l Indio, CA 922`'2 �►� -ram C^AT BI #4 DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CITY OF LA QUINTA RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DRAFT "REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO UPDATE THE GENERAL PLAN" CITYWIDE The General Plan for the City of La Quinta was last updated in 1992; the State recommends updating General Plans every five years. As a result of growth and expansion, changes in State law, and City Council direction; the adopted 1992 General Plan needs revision. The General Plan update will be comprehensive, consistent, and long-term. The selection of a consultant to assist the City in the preparation of the update will follow the Consultant Selection procedures outlined in the La Quinta Municipal Code. This process requires the formation of a Selection Committee with City Council participation/observation, a review of current City listed firms and a possible solicitation of firms with a Request for Qualifications, and a Request for Proposals for services. It is anticipated a consultant will be contracted by the City for services by February, 1997. The draft RFP (Attachment No. 1) is provided for review and comment. The Request for Proposals calls for the update of all General Plan Elements (except the recently certified Housing element) and adding a Historical and Archaeological .Element. The General Plan update requires a Program Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) Which is a portion of the consultant services requested. The public participation process could follow the 1992 General Plan Update process in which the City held Joint Planning Commission and City Council community workshops; or a General Plan Advisory Committee could be formed. A minimum of one Planning Commission and one City Council public hearing is required for Plan adoption. RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff with comments on the draft RFP, and recommend to the City Council that staff initiate the consultant selection process. pcfb.001 Attachments: Draft - Request for Proposals to update La Quinta's General Plan Prepared by Fred Baker, Principal -Planner Submitted by Christine di Iorio, Planning Manager pcfb.001 DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO UPDATE LA QUINTA'S GENERAL PLAN Issued by: The City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 619-777-7125 lggp.001 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Overview ....................................... 3 II. Scope of Services Required ............................... 5 III. Meetings .............................................. 8 IV. Products .............................................. 8 V. Format .............................................. 10 VI. Role of The Consultant ................................. 10 VII. Available Budget/Contract .............................. 11 VIII. Evaluation of Proposals/Selection Process .................. 12 IX. Submittal Requirements For Proposals .................... 13 X. Contacts ............................................. 15 XI. Attachments ......................................... 16 Iggp.001 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of La Quinta is seeking planning and environmental consulting services to update and revise its General Plan and to update and prepare a Master Environmental Assessment, Program Environmental Impact Report. Adopted in 1992, the City's General Plan is outdated as a result of the City's growth and expansion, changes in State law, and City Council direction. Some portions of the plan have been updated periodically since 1992, but no comprehensive update has been undertaken until now. This year the Zoning ("ode was updated based on current conditions and the General Plan. This General Plan update and revision must be comprehensive, consistent, and long- term. This update will contain all required elements plus a Historic and Archaeological Element. The City has a State certified Housing Element requiring no modifications. The update will be prepared in a manner consistent with California General Plan Law (Government Code Section 65300 et seq.), and the California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 et. seq.), and other applicable laws and regulations. As demonstrated in the Request for Qualifications, the selected consultant/project team members will need to have knowledge and experience in growth oriented resort communities, environmental characteristics of desert communities, Economic development, citizen participation, California General Planning Law and CEQA, as well as an excellent working relationship with clients. It is anticipated that the consultant will be the ;primary liaison with a City Project Management Team, initiate contacts with other affected agencies, and present materials to City staff, public workshops, City Commissions, and City Council. The City Project Management Team will consist of: Community Development Director Planning Manager Principal Planner (Project Director) Engineering Representative City Manager, Assistant City Manager & City Attorney on an as needed basis And other City personnel as needed The City of La Quinta, surrounded on the west and south by the rugged and dramatic slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains, was incorporated in 1982 as a General Law City in Riverside County. On the November 5, 1996, ballot, the city will vote on whether iggp.001 3 it should be a Charter City. With approximately 31.18 square miles and a current population estimate of approximately 18,046, the City has maintained a healthy annual growth rate over the last five years. It is anticipated that the City will continue to be a prime growth area in the desert, while preserving the natural open space of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The growing population of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley provides ample potential for commercial development. (High quality residential and resort developments offering golf, tennis, and other amenities will continue to establish :La Quinta as the "Gem of the Desert".) II. SCOPE OF SERVICES REQUIRED Because of the broad. scope of the General Plan Update which will include issues ranging from land use to air quality, it is difficult to enumerate in the Request for Proposals, all the issues affecting this project. The scope of the project will address the entire City; however„ the planning area will include all lands within the existing Sphere of Influence and properties that may be annexed during the course of this project. Also, the update shall include the potential to annex the north and northeast area outside of the Sphere of Influence. The purpose of this project is to update all existing elements of the General Plan (except Housing); to draft a new Historical and Archaeological Element and to prepare the environmental documentation necessary to process the General Plan Amendment. All individual elements should contain clearly defined goals and policies which provide a vision of what the City desires to be over the next ten years. Consultants preparing proposals should not be constrained by the discussion in this Request for Proposals from suggesting different and innovative approaches to this project. The City is particularly interested in developing a workable and meaningful update which will be an effective guide to the City's future. The City is not interested in generating a mere compliance document which will gather dust on a shelf. The consultant will complete all the following work tasks in a timely manner: Identification of Issues, Opportunities and Constraints. Interview City Council members, key appointed officials, and work with City staff to establish relevant issues. Evaluate existing goals, policies, plans and programs to identify current deficiencies in the General Plan. 2. Data collection and analysis/update the Master Environmental Assessment. Conduct a reconnaissance survey/needs assessment of the City 1ggp.001 4 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. focusing on the issues of each of the General Plan elements. Develop a data base that will be drawn from in the preparation of the General Plan Update and the Master Environmental Assessment/Program Environmental Impact Report. Develop Goals and Objectives. Prepare a preliminary Land Use Plan and a preliminary Circulation Plan. Prepare the Draft General Plan/Master Environmental Assessment/Program in two work phases containing: Phase One Elements: Land Use Circulation Open Space Environmental Conservation Environmental Hazards Infrastructure and Public Services Phase Two Elements: Parks and Recreation Air Quality Historical and Archaeological Conduct Public workshop(s) Prepare Program Environmental Impact Report Planning Commission and related Commission approvals. City Council approval. Prepare a General Plan Summary Workshops, Study Sessions and Public Hearings The City anticipates final adoption of the General Plan Update within 12-15 months of written notice to proceed with the project. III. MEETINGS Conduct/attend up to eight (8) Study Sessions for the review of the General Plan by the Planning Commission and City Council. lggp.001 Conduct/attend up to six (6) Public Hearings for the approval of the General Plan by the Planning Commission and City Council. Conduct up to three (3) "Town Hall" General Plan workshops. IV. PRODUCTS • La Quinta General Plan (maps & text). • Master Environmental Assessment/Program Environmental Impact Report (maps & text). • General Plan Summary (a public relations document) • 100 copies of the General Plan document and 50 copies of the MEA, and 100 copies of the EIR upon final adoption. • 500 copies of the General Plan Summary. NOTE: All written material will be in WordPerfect 6.1. Diskette copies of the final and approved General Plan and MEA and EIR are required. All data, information, materials and work produced including final camera-ready text, maps and graphics will become the sole property of the City of La Quinta. V. FORMAT The format of the General Plan shall be done in such a manner as to easily incorporate updates and amendments unless the proposing consultant recommends otherwise and the City agrees, the format of the General Plan Update shall follow the current General Plan format currently (See Attachment #4). The use of WordPerfect 6.1 currently is required so that future changes to the document can be completed in- house. VI. ROLE OF THE CONSULTANT The role of the consultant is expected to be an extension of City staff. The consultant is expected to keep an open dialogue with staff and to work closely with the City Project Management Team to ensure the updated General Plan reflects, to the greatest degree possible, the sentiment and opinion of the citizens of La Quinta. It is lggp•001 6 anticipated that, at a nunimum, there will be one project meeting per month with the City Project Management Team to review progress and resolve problems. The consultant will be responsible for preparing the agenda and conducting these meetings. In addition, the consultant should be prepared to attend several meetings with the Planning staff at the La Quinta Community Development Department. The consultant will conduct the public workshops, Planning Commission, and City Council Study Sessions and Public Hearings. The consultant will be responsible for the production of all graphics, hand outs, and other material necessary for successful workshops, Study Sessions and Public Hearings. As an extension of City staff, the consultant will be expected to function in the following roles: • Professional Planner • Consensus builder (mediator) • Organizer • Provider of technical information • Educator In order to establish and maintain project continuity throughout the duration of the project, the consultant will identify one individual (Project Manager) that the City can contact for all project related needs. The City will identify one individual (Project Director) that the consultant's Project Manager will contact for project related needs. This primary contact should not preclude other necessary City/consultant lines of communication. VII. AVAILABLE BUDGET/CONTRACT The City wishes to negotiate a fixed price contract with a not to exceed dollar total based on a clearly defined scope of work. This project will involve two separate and identifiable phases of work, and consultant proposals shall be prepared in two phases documenting and itemizing all costs separately. It should be noted that the selected consultant will be required to carry both Workmen's Compensation and General Liability Insurance. VIII. EVALUATIOI\f OF PROPOSALS/SELECTION PROCESS A Consultant Selection Team will review the proposals and select three to five consultant team members for an interview with the City of La Quinta. Composition of the City interview team will be determined later. The interview team will make a recommendation to the City Council which will make the final decision on the selection of a consultant. The City intends to focus the interview on those project team members who will be working most closely with staff and who will be responsible for conducting/leading public meetings. lggp.001 7 The consultant team will be evaluated based on the following criteria; • Responsiveness to requirements of the project • Creativity and innovation • Project Management approach • Technical and methodological approach • Communication skills of project personnel • Cost • Qualifications Planning staff will hold an orientation meeting on to discuss this RFP and answer questions. at by us know whether or not you will attend. The tentative selection schedule is as follows: Issue Request for Proposals Staff orientation meeting Proposal Due Date Oral presentations/interviews Contract Negotiations Recommendation to City Council Start Project IX. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSALS Send five (5) copies of your proposal to: Christine di Iorio, Planning Manager Community Development Department City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Written proposals are due by , 199_. on at Please contact _, 19_, to let The minimum project proposal must include the following information: • A detailed work program explaining your firms approach to accomplishing each facet of this project including a Scope of Work lggp.001 8 detailing the sequence and timing (project schedule) of the tasks to be performed and the anticipated products from each task. Identify all products to be prepared for presentation to the public. Identify all products to be prepared in Phase One and Phase Two of the work program. Ail overall itemized project budget. The project timing requires the work program to be divided into two phases. Each phase of work should have an itemized budget including labor costs and expenses for each piece of work and each person working on this project. • A preliminary approach to organizing the plan document. • A project team organization chart. • A schedule of your availability for staff and public meetings. • An enumeration of your requirements of City staff and resources. • Only submit additions deletions or changes, from your Statement of Qualifications presented to the City of La Quinta on , 96. X. CONTACTS All questions regarding this project should be directed to Christine di Iorio, Planning Manager, Community Development Department, City of La Quinta at 617-777-7125 prior to the orientation meeting on , 1996. This will allow the City to provide a thoughtful response to all questions at this time benefiting all potential consultants. XI. ATTACHMENTS 1. La Quinta General Plan Master Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Report 2. City Profile 3. List of available Planning documents lggp.001 9