The URL can be used to link to this page

1991 07 23 PCWi�� a� ��z �u�n�a A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California July 23, 1991 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER — Flag Salute ROLL CALL � � NOTE -Ar 'k ALL AGENDA ITEMS NOT CONSIDERED BY 11:00 P.M. MAYBE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING Beginning Resolution No. 91-023 Beginning Minute Motion No. 91-018 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Item ................ Applicant ........... Location............ Request............. Action.............. AGENDAI.8PC CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-031, CHANGE OF ZONE 90-056, SPECIFIC PLAN 90-016 Landmark Land Company Generally bounded by 52nd Avenue on the south, Jefferson Street on the west, 50th Avenue on the north and the All American Canal on the east. Request for approval of a 327 acres project, including golf course, residential and commercial uses, incorporating a 21 acre commercial site and 1208 residential units. Resolutions 91- _, 91- , 91- 2. Item ................ Applicant ........... Location ............ Request ............. Action .............. 3. Item ................ Applicant ........... Location ............ Request ............. Action .............. 4. Item ................ Applicant ........... Location ............ Request ............. Action .............. PUBLIC COMMENT CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-029, CHANGE OF ZONE 90-054, SPECIFIC PLAN 90-015 Landmark Land Company Generally bounded by Airport Boulevard on the south, Madison Street on the west, 55th Avenue on the north, and Monroe Street on the east. Request for approval of a 265 acre project, including golf course, and residential uses, incorporating 1060 residential units. Resolutions 91- , 91- 91-- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - PUBLIC USE PERMIT 91-010 Michael & Glenda Bangerter South side of Sagebrush Avenue extension east side of Date Palm Drive Proposed Preschool/Day-Care Center To be continued PUBLIC USE PERMIT 91-011 La Quinta Arts Foundation West end of Civic Center Site at Southwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico Approval of a Public Use Permit to allow the construction and operation of a 6,000 square foot Arts Foundation Administration and display building. Minute Motion 91- This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Planning Commission on matters relating to City planning and zoning which are not Agenda items. Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission should use the form provided. Please complete a form and submit the form to the Recording Secretary prior to the beginning of the meeting. Your name will be called at the appropriate time. When addressing the Planning Commission, please state your name and address. The proceedings of the Planning Commission meeting are recorded on tape and comments of each person shall be limited to three minutes. AGENDA/CS BUSINESS SESSION 1. Item ................ TRACT 23269 Applicant ........... Williams Development Company ]Location ............ La Quinta Highlands, Lots 31-72, 165 and 149, southwest corner of Adams Street and Fred Waring Drive. These lots are located on Sonesta Way, Villeta Drive , Arosa Way and La Palma Drive Request ............. Review of architectural elevations for units to be constructed on 44 lots. Action .............. Minute Motion 91- 2. Item ................ NEW CART STORAGE SCREEN WALL Applicant ........... Von's Market Location ............ Plaza La Quinta, southwest corner of Washington Street and Highway 111 Request ............. Approval of construction of a cart storage screen wall Action .............. To be continued 3. Item ................ PLOT PLAN 90-445 Applicant ........... Edward Nigg Location ............ 51-066 Avenida Mendoza (Village Specific Plan area) Request ............. One year extension of time Action .............. Minute Motion 91- CONSENT CALENDAR Approve Minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting held July 9, 1991. OTHER - None ADJOURNMENT AGENDA/CS STUDY SESSION MONDAY, JULY 22, 1991 City Council Chambers DISCUSSION ONLY 4:00 P.M. 1. All Agenda items. ITEMS IDENTIFIED FOR FUTURE AGENDAS a. Height limits along Washington Street - Specific Plan Amendment b. Downtown Parking District - develop time line C. PGA West Specific Plan - review d. Commercial Noise Study - General Plan inclusion e. Guest houses - draft regulations f. Satellite Dishes - Commercial and Residential zones AGENDA/CS MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 23, 1991 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-031, CHANGE OF ZONE 90-056 & SPECIFIC PLAN 90-016 - LANDMARK LAND COMPANY The subject project and related applications were continued on July 9 to a public hearing at this evening's meeting. Staff is requesting that this project be continued to your next scheduled meeting of August 13, 1991. Staff has received the Final EIR as of the date of this memo; however, review of the document for adequacy has not been completed. This document should be available in time for distribution prior to your August 13, 1991 meeting. A staff report should be available at that meeting also. MEMOWN.026/CS t MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 23, 1991 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-029, CHANGE OF ZONE 90-054 & SPECIFIC PLAN 90-015 - LANDMARK LAND COMPANY The subject items were continued from your July 9, 1991 meeting to a public hearing at tonights meeting. Staff is requesting that this project be continued to your next scheduled meeting of August 13, 1991, as the Final EIR has not yet been reviewed completely for adequacy. The Final EIR should be available for distribution prior to your August 13th meeting, so that you will have some time to review it. We hope to have a Staff Report available also at your next meeting. MEMOWN.027/CS- P H-� STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JULY 23, 1991 - CONTINUED FROM JULY 9, 1991 PROJECT: PUBLIC USE PERMIT 91-010 PROPOSED PRESCHOOL/DAY-CARE CENTER APPLICANT: GLENDA & MICHAEL BANGERTER ENGINEER: ADVANCED ENGINEERING GROUP ARCHITECT: MOSER ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF SAGEBRUSH AVENUE EXTENSION EAST SIDE OF DATE PALM DRIVE BACKGROUND: 1. The proposed preschool/day-care center will care for 230 children (200 children initially and 30 more after Phase Two) and 23 employees, and comprise three phases, the first (classroom & administration buildings) 8,851 square feet, the second (infant and toddler center) (1,056 square feet) and the third (multi -use facility) 2,000 square feet. 2. The facility is located on a triangular shaped lot along side the CVWD evacuation channel. 3. The proposed buildings are grouped around a central open play area located alongside the CVWD channel. 4. This project was continued from the July 9, 1991 meeting to allow additional time for the preparation of a traffic study. TRAFFIC STUDY: More time is required to study the traffic study for this project. Staff therefore recommends that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing for Public Use Permit 90-010 until the August 13, 1991 meeting. RECOMMENDATION• By Minute Motion, continue the hearing for Public Use Permit 91-010 until August 13, 1991. Attachments: 1. Locality plan 2. Architectural drawings (reductions) STAFFRPT.031/CS ATTACHMENT No, 1 CASE Nm PUP 90-010 ATTACHMENT No. 2 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (l�. c..►� 7. IN NOSOR/ ♦ �rlurJt Afi� iY�sx �A+"i 1�r.Js:n:M i7 3 HAS dV�SCl1 "I Yuenr Iv gr ADM0 r:IW .1Yd OQS'61 s¢s t ATTACHMENT No. 2 21 rl ap 0 t i1 � 'r..' 1 J. �� t� --� d — • 1 � D f ra 1 •�•... r wry 101 ► " . I6 g0l1"Ilq 'Y.ltiUid Yi da "d Siva oxv IOOH:)S 3111 PI W.T,N' O Yl I. 1-ii-Al, EM fo+iM 'vmf)D vt r i as rmt stun 0 7oox�s a}�} yLan� vl .1pows W= YUGao Yl ATTACHMENT No. 3 Glenda and Michael Bangerter 53-245 Avenida Martinez La Quinta, CA 92253 (619)564-1486 02 July 1991 Planning Commission City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Regarding: La Quinta Little School Preschool/Day Care Center #91-010 To whom it may concern: A special request was made of us by Mr. Jerry Herman of the La Quinta Planning Department on 25 June 1991 for a traffic study on our proposed project. The results will not be made available to us until after our scheduled hearing. For this reason we respectfully request a continuance in order to present all necessary information to the committee. Thank you fcr your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Glenda L. Bangerter / bg Mull tuWaTIVIV03 , v vi WL . NW4 31Y4 Wf* IOOKNZ=VI)Wlovll July 15, 1991 City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 To whom it may concern: I would like to take this opportunity to express my support for the proposed "La Quinta Little School" project. It is in our best interest as a community to assist in the efforts of Mrs. Bangerter to provide a safe, nurturing environment for our youngest citizens of La Quinta. Very truly yours, Robert W �6�4 � 48-775 Avenida Fernando La Quinta, CA 92253 vp'f r 9"Iff I ,UL 1 i 1991 La Quinta Planning Commission La Quinta, California 92253 CITY OFLAouiNre Dear Planning Commissioners, It seems peculiar that I am even writing you this letter. However, after the public hearing you hosted July 9, 1991 for the proposed La Quinta Little School I thought I had better get something on paper. I live on Sagebrush and am in favor of the day care. I am not the only one on Sagebrush that feels this way as you would be led to believe at the public hearing. My neighbor Craig Toohey has signed the petition that I am enclosing, also Rober7-- Reynolds has verbalized his positive feelings towards the school also. I remember the public hearing for the Parc La Quinta project a few years ago when the residents of Monterc Estates called the proposed project "like putting a Ford Pinto next to a Cadillac." I was opposed to the project at the time also, feeling it would ruin my desert surroundings. The Planning Commission and the City Council went on and cleared the project, and now even though it is not quite sold out I see Parc La Quinta as a successful project that adds a great deal to the community. Once it is gated, which should happen in the next few months, it will be an even more valuable address. The planners and council members had insight beyond the complaints of the community, and that insight silenced the critics of that development. The critics are loud once again, only against a day care nursery for children. "Noise pollution" stated one, who says she can't sleep during the day. "Air pollution," yelled another, her children will be affected she fears, even though she is a smoker. "Traffic congestion," claimed the Parc La Quinta residents who must be afraid they will not be able to run the stop signs and speed down Sagebrush once the school is finished, never mind that the gates are going in prior to the day cares opening. "The danger of the cars," cried another though she is not worried about her seven and eleven year old boys illegally riding a Honda three wheeled vehicle, no longer manufactured because the danger is 'too great a risk. "Everyone is against it," yells another, who distorted traffic figures to such a degree that she managed to instill fear in the neighborhood. I am a teacher, and for the life of me I can never understand people who are willing to help parents with the job of parenting. Maybe they want those things, they just are not willing to sacrifice in order to have them. We have become a society that is not willing to sacrifice a little for the benefit of our children. We want it now, in our own way, and we want to be sure it does not interrupt the sitcoms that must be watched on television. I believe in children, and I know you do also. That is why you set up a task force, before the state thought it an issue, to address some of the child care problems. We have to be willing to put our children first if they are going to succeed. The Little School's location is a good one. It is in a nice community, near schools, not on a main street, and has Nice people willing to operate it. The few problems are all solvable. Barricade the streets of Saguaro and Bottlebrush. Be sure that Parc La Quinta puts up it's gates, and then put in a light at the main gate on Washington that allows left hand turns in and out of the project. Put Date Palm through to 50th and put in a light there; this will slow down traffic to the schools and make the entrance to the day care flow more easily when parents drop or pick up students from both school sites. If you must cul de sac Sagebrush at the end near the school and this will allow traffic in to the Little School only by Date Palm, thus eliminating the traffic problem all together (this is possible now that the housing project by CV Land is using The Pyramids access.) I do ask the Planning Commission and the Council to show the kind of insight that they have used in the past. our only real legacy to anything we do is what we leave for our children, and I believe any school where the teachers are good is a very valuable asset. I greatly respect the job you are doing, and fully understand how difficult it is. Good luck and God Bless. S' tt yK��r 1 .�t7 R.ny Harvey i F JUL 1 71991 r CITY OF LA fiNrA i PITY MAMAf F c ncor July 15, 1991 City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 9,2253 Gentlemen: As homeowners in La Quinta, we would like to request the approval of the proposed pre-school/child care center; La Quinta Little School. Our grandchildren also live in La Quinta and we recognize the real need for child care in this city. We would like tc offer our support for this worthwhile project. Sincerely, J' nd Lorraine Mann 48-695 San Vicenti La Quinta, CA 92253 ONROF.-xESr Anociatm Inc. July 10, 1991 City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, Ca 92253 Att: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager Dear Mr. Kiedrowski, Monroe -Kest Associates is one of the largest professional mail houses in the Coachella Valley and we recently provided mailing services to the developer of the La Quinta Little School. We would like to explain exactly what we provided and explain the almost unbelievable results. In the end of June we mailed a very simple one page letter with a postage paid response card enclosed to a random sampling of homeowners in La Quinta who received their mail at a 92253 zip code. This meant we were mailing to people who own and live in La Quinta, and the list contained a little less than 1900 name and addresses. Our list which is generated from assessor's information can only be about 80% accurate. In conclusion we mailed to and reached about fifteen hundred residents. In the beginning of July we received ,on behalf of our client, bundles of response cards through our permit (Palm Desert 328),and we were very surprised with the results. All told we received over TWO HUNDRED cards This is clearly a response rate of 13.3% The cards are still arriving. In the mailing business a 1% or 2% result or response rate is considered good. What was most interesting about these cards was the fact that all but a six cards were uproariously positive. The positive responses included newlyweds without children, retired couples with no children at home, and even several requests for employment! 74-818 Velie Way, Suite #3, Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (619) 779- 0460 FAX (619) 779- 0463 PH-4 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: JULY 23, 1991 PROJECT: PUBLIC USE PERMIT 91-011 APPLICANT: LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION ARCHITECT: WALLING AND MC CALLUM REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A PUBLIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 6,000 SQUARE FOOT ARTS FOUNDATION ADMINISTRATION AND DISPLAY BUILDING. LOCATION: WEST END OF CIVIC CENTER SITE AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION:MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES EXISTING ZONING: SR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 90-185 (FOR PUP 90-007 FOR THE LA QUINTA CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX) WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY ON JANUARY 15, 1991. THAT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INCLUDED CONSIDERATION OF AN ARTS FOUNDATION BUILDING ON THE SUBJECT SITE. THEREFORE, THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HAS DETERMINED THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IS DEEMED NECESSARY. Iff:1z1 KIR**y AND ZONING: NORTH: R-2 *-4000 AND C-P/SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE AND VACANT LAND, RESPECTIVELY. SOUTH: SR/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND VACANT LAND. EAST: SR/BALANCE OF CIVIC CENTER SITE WITH VACANT LAND AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ACROSS EAST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET. WEST: R-V 10,000/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND VACANT LAND. STAFFRPT.036/CS -1- DESCRIPTION OF SITE: THE PROPERTY CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 18 ACRES AND WILL ULTIMATELY HOUSE THE NEW CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, LIBRARY, SENIOR CENTER AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND A LARGE LANDSCAPING AREA, IN ADDITION TO THE PROPOSED ARTS FOUNDATION BUILDING. THE SITE IS PRESENTLY BEING ROUGH GRADED WITH THE SPARSE DESERT VEGETATION REMOVED. THE ARTS FOUNDATION BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERLY END OF THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE SENIOR CENTER AND LIBRARY. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO CONTAIN APPROXIMATELY 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR SPACE. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE BUILDING WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, DISPLAY AND SALE OF ART WORK AND CLASSES. THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED WITH THE ENTRY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE PARKING LOT AREA. ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS THEIR LIBRARY/CONFERENCE/DISPLAY ROOM WITH ACCESS TO A LARGE OPEN LANDSCAPE AREA WHICH MAY ALSO BE UTILIZED FOR FUTURE ARTS FESTIVALS. THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED IN A "SOUTHWEST" STYLE WITH EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTING OF STUCCO, WOOD TRIM, AND A TILE ROOF. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: The Design Review Board reviewed this request at their meeting of July 3, 1991, and recommended approval, subject to future building signage and landscaping around the building being reviewed by the Design Review Board. CONCLUSION: Staff feels that the proposed request is Foundation building complies with overall and is designed to be compatible with the surrounding areas. RECOMMENDATION: acceptable. The Arts Civic Center plans Civic Center and By Minute Motion approve Public Use Permit 91-011, subject to the attached conditions. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Conceptual Civic Center Complex plan 3. Comments from various agencies 4. Plan exhibits STAFFRPT.036/CS -2- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED PUBLIC USE PERMIT 91-011, LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION JULY 23, 1991 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The development of the site shall generally be in conformance with the exhibits contained in the file for Public Use Permit 91-011, unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 2. The approved public use permit shall be used within two years of Planning Commission approval; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever, unless extended by the Planning Commission as allowed by Municipal Code. "By used" means the beginning of substantial construction which was allowed by this approval not including grading, which is begun within the two year period and thereafter diligently pursued to completion. 3. Building identification signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to installation. 4. Landscaping immediately around the structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to installation. 5. Final building and site plans shall be subject to approval of the city. CONAPRVL.017/CS GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE • PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 (714) 657-3183 June 17, 1991 To: City of La Quinta FCi-pw�-u Planning Division J U N 1 9 1991 Attention: Stan Sawa CI1 V ur- LA quINTA Re: Public Use Permit 91-011 �1 dNN1NC x OEyEt()puI'4tT t1EP7 La Quinta Arts Foundation With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced PUP, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: 1. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Fire flow is based upon the building being equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 2. The required fire flow.shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2}" x 2}") located not less than 25' nor more than 165' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. 3. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). System plans must be submitted with a plan check/inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 4. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A1OBC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 5. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 6. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 7. Install a Fire Alarm System per NFPA 71 that provides for valve supervision and 24 hour monitoring of the waterflow alarm at the automatic fire sprinkler system. Audible devices shall be placed as required for the waterflow alarm to be heard at any point in the building at a minimum of 10 db above the ambient noise level. ISINDIO OFFICE 9-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, Indio, CA 92201 (619) 342-8886 • FAX (619) 775.2072 PLANNING DIVISION ❑ RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12th Street, Riverside, CA 92501 (714) 275-4777 • FAX (714) 369.7451 ❑ TEWCUTA OFFICE 41002 County Center Drive, Suite 225, Temecula, CA 91390 (714) 694-5070 9 FAX (714) 694-5076 9§ printed on recycled page• City of La Quinta Planning Div. Attn: Stan Sawa Re: PUP 91-011 L.Q. Arts Foundation 6/17/91 Page 2. 8. Approved building address shall be placed in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed. A plan check fee must be paid to the Fire Department at the time building plans are submitted. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department Planning & Engineering Staff at (619) 342-8886. Sincerely, RAY REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By a L Tom Hutchison Fire Safety Specialist to cc: B-7 *ATE" a STATE" ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (619) 398-2651 DIRECTORS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT RAYMOND R RUMMONDS, VICE PRESIDENT JOHN W.McFADDEN DOROTHY M. NICHOLS THEODORE J. FISH Planning Commission City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Gentlemen: OFFICERS THOMAS E. LEVY, GENERAL MANAGER -CHIEF ENGINEER BERNARDE TTON, SECRETARY June 20, 1991 OWEN MCCOOK ASSI TANT GENERAL MANAGER " 1 t { REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS File: 0163.1 JUNi99, C, 1 r `quiNTA OE�I l pm[NT D P T PIANNI�IC Subject: Public Use Permit 91-011, Portion of Southwest Quarter, Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from regional stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone A0, depth one foot, on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 55 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager -Chief Engineer RF:lmf/e6 cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health, Bermuda Dunes TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY TAf Qawo 1 78-105 CALLE ESTA00 - LA OUINTA. aqF&tWQWO- (819) 564-2246 FAX (819) 584-5817 FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DATE: L --7- Q ( \ City Manager v Waste Management Principal "C4 Public Works/Engineering General Telephone Planner(s) Ni Fire Marshal v Palmer Cable Vision V Associate C Building & Safety Sunline Transit Planner(s) 'Chamber of Commerce Caltrans (District II) Assistant CVWD Agricultural Commission v Imperial Irrigation City of Indian Wells�hg. Southern California Gas City of Indio Director Desert Sands School Dist. US Postal Service �„*I 1 Z boos Coachella Valley School Dist. Riverside ty: CV Archaeological Society Plan pip TA Property Envi eXX�t''aL?, EPj Owner's Association She�q�frW U Lc( OU tof& GQ rbs fo t4rJajvt, . LA QUINTA CASE NOW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION:-6ecz,0c op �JaslnL&I4n c36 + mum oz�at op 51 The City o a Development RevieAL Committee is conducting an initial environmental study pdrruenrto the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the above reference ect(s). Attached is the information submitted by the project proponent. Your comments are requested with respect Aya hcr, hysical impacts the project presents on public resources, facilities, nd/or services; '>2. Recommended conditions: a) that you or your agency believe would miti- gate any potential adverse effects; b) or should apply to the project design; c) or improvements to satisfy other regulations and concerns which your agency is responsible; and If you find that the identified impacts will have significant adverse ffects on the environment which cannot be avoided through conditions, ease recommend the scope and focus of additional study(ies) which ran plari51i-P nof` mow'' Please sLnd your response by and return the maps/plans if not needed for your f les. You are nv ted to attend the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE meeting at La Quinta City Hall scheduled for: Date: -ills -�Time: � Contact Person:.- Title:T('ti Q/b Comments made h Title: Date: " Phone: Agency/Division 78.105 CALLE ESTADO — tA1 OUINTA. CALIFORNIA 92253 - (819) 564-2246 FAX (619) 564-5817 FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DATE: City Manager ante Management Principal `; Public Works/Engineering General Telephone nner(s) V Fire Marshal r Palmer Cable Vision SUN 1 !mociate Building & Safety Sunline Transit (s) Chamber of Commerce Caltrans ( Distri(em pr i, t CVWD Agricultural Co INab , v Imperial Irrigation City of Indian Wells V Planning C'Southern California Gas City of Indio Director Desert Sands School Dist. US Postal Service Coachella Valley School Dist. Riverside County: CV Archaeological Society Planning Department _Property Environmental Health Owner's Association _Sheriff's Department La 0-4 10+& GQrbs v c�nda-4x�✓1, LA QUINTA CASE NO(S) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: .011 q► CM11,141 PROJECT LOCATION: op wAt-7 t hun4n C-4 + - _& The City oZT-Zw a Development Review Committee is conducting an initial environmental study pur to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the above reference ect(s). Attached is the information submitted by the project proponent. Your comments are requested with respect to: 4,VJ4, he+ Physical impacts the project presents on public resources, facilities, nd/or services; >2. Recommended conditions: a) that you or your agency believe would miti- gate any potential adverse effects; b) or should apply to the project design; c) or improvements to satisfy other regulations and concerns which your agency is responsible; and If you find that the identified impacts will have significant adverse ffects on the environment which cannot be avoided through conditions, ease recommend the scope and focus of additional study(ies) which � rew �helpful. -; nod- ' Please sLnd your response by and return the maps/plans if not needed for your f les. You are nvited to attend the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE meeting at La Quinta City Hall scheduled for: Date: _o Time: Contact Person: ':___1eSkA_- Title:Pl" kNE C1lN r�1 or C'�s ��L�n ► r�lL c� �� s� of T"� }cam - ant C�csc ' LL-- (3( @ per Cir- `rm, s p4c-:r SJ�M IT f�► 26�lisE7� p F+�� ov/L Ie-f,�s , w -lam . Comments made by:Title: 0_:z91 , Date: Phone: Agency/Division �f� �, �;�-�cY •�Tx- - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QUINTA A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California July 9, 1991 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. The meeting was called to order at 7:03 P.M. by Vice Chairperson Barrows. The Flag Salute was led by Commissioners Ellson. II. ELECTION OF OFFICERS A. It was moved by Commissioner Mosher and seconded by Commissioner Ladner to nominate Commissioner Barrows as Chairperson. There being no further nominations, Commissioner Ellson moved and Commissioner Mosher seconded the motion to close the nominations. On a roll call vote Katie Barrows was elected Chairperson unanimously. B . It was moved by Commissioner Ladner and seconded by Chairperson Barrows to nominate Commissioner Mosher as Vice Chairman. There being no further nominations Commissioner Ellson moved and Chairperson Barrows seconded the motion to close the nominations. On a roll call vote H . Fred Mosher was elected as Vice Chairman. III. ROLL CALL A. Chairperson Barrows requested the roll call. Present: Commissioners Mosher, Ladner, Ellson, and Chairperson Barrows. B . Staff Present: Planning Director Jerry Herman, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit, Associate Planner Glenda Lainis, and Department Secretary Betty Anthony. IV. AGENDA REORGANIZED A. Commissioner Mosher moved and Commissioner Ladner seconded the motion to reorganize the agenda as follows: Public Hearing Item #2 becomes Item #5 Public Hearing Item #5 becomes Item #2 All other items stayed the same. Unanimously approved. V . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Public Hearing - General Plan Amendment 90-031, Change of Zone 90-056, Specific Plan 90-016; a request of Landmark Land for approval of a 327 acre project, including golf course, residential and commercial uses, incorporating a 21 acre commercial site and 1208 residential units. I . Chairperson Barrows opened the public hearing and as no one wished to address the Commission regarding the matter it was moved by Commissioner Mosher and seconded by Commissioner Ladner to continue the matter to July 23, 1991. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Mosher, Ladner, Ellson & Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: None. B . General Plan Amendment 90-029, Change of Zone 90-054, and Specific Plan 90-015; a request of Landmark Land Company for approval of a 265 acre project, including golf course, and residential uses, incorporating 1060 residential units. 1' . Chairperson Barrows opened the public hearing and as no one wished to address the Commission regarding the matter it was moved by Commissioner Ladner and seconded by Commissioner Mosher to continue the matter to July 23, 1991. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Mosher, Ladner, Ellson & Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: None. C. Continued Public Hearing for Tentative Tract 26181; a request of Ray Troll to subdivide 14 gross acres into 52 single family lots. Chairperson Barrows opened the public hearing and as no one wished to address the Commission regarding the matter it was moved by Commissioner Ellson and seconded by Commissioner Mosher to continue the matter to August 13, 1991. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Mosher, Ladner, Ellson & Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: None. D. Public Use Permit 91-009; a request of Desert Baptist Church regarding a. proposed church with associated parking on a 4.21 acre site in the R- 1-12,000/PD zone. 1. Commissioner Ladner excused herself due to a possible conflict of interest. 2. Associate Planner Glenda Lainis presented the information contained in the Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. 3. Commissioners questioned Staff regarding the completion timing of the parking lot, the adjacent projects dead-end street, the setback requirements, and the possibility of chimes. Planning PCMIN7-9 Director Jerry Herman stated all were in compliance with City policies. He asked that the Applicant be addressed concerning the issue of chimes. 4. Chairperson Barrows opened the public hearing. Warren Stallard, Boardmember of the Church, spoke on behalf of the Applicant and stated they had reviewed all the Conditions of Approval and had questions regarding the following: a. Condition #6: asked that the noise study be deleted as no additional noise would be generated and the wall and landscaping would mitigate any possibility. b . Condition #9 : Coachella Valley School District needed to be changed to Desert Sands Unified School District. C. Condition #23: would like to add a prefix to read, "Prior to issuance of a grading permit". d. Condition #24: again add prefix to read, "Prior to occupancy". e. Condition #26: delete portion that reads, "performance security in the amount of 100% of the approved estimated cost of the improvements and", and add at end of sentence, "posted prior to issuance of grading permit". e. Condition #27: prefix to read, "Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit". f . Condition #28 : delete in its entirety as the above covers everything. 5. Mr. Stallard stated this would allow them to build their building and have these costs at the completion of the building. 6. Discussion followed between Senior Civil Engineer Steve Speer and the Applicant regarding Condition #38. Mr. Speer stated this condition was applied to all projects and most had found engineers who would certify to the statement when one of their qualified employees did the monitoring. To all the above changes, the City had no objections. 6. Planning Director Jerry Herman stated the noise study could be deleted if the Commission adopted a finding stating that the project was consistent with the General Plan in that it would not generate any additional noise more than generated in a residential neighborhood and the use is less than a 24 hour per day use. 7. In regards to the chimes, Mr. Stallard stated the church had no plans for any chimes or bells. PCMIN7-9 9. Commissioner Ellson inquired if the Applicant had any plans to convert the classrooms to any type of school or day-care. Mr. Stallard stated they had no plans for such at this time. .10. Chairperson Barrows inquired if the church had any objections to reducing the amount of lawn. Mr. Stallard stated they had no objections. .11. There being no further discussion Chairperson Barrows closed the public hearing and Commissioner Mosher moved and Commissioner Ellson seconded the motion to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 91-018 approving Public Use Permit 91-009 to allow the creation of a church subject to the amended conditions as stated above with the addition of the following: a. Condition 42. That chimes would not be allowed. b . Condition 43. That the lawn area adjacent to the street be reduced and replaced with ground cover. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Mosher, Ellson & Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: Commissioner Ladner. E . Commissioner Mosher moved and Commissioner Ellson seconded the motion to again reorganize the agenda as follows: Public Hearing Item #6 becomes Item #5 Public Hearing Item #5 becomes Item #6 All other items stayed the same. Unanimously approved. F. Public Use Permit 91-010; a request of Michael and Glenda Bangerter for approval of a proposed Preschool/Day-Care Center. 1 . Chairperson Barrows opened the public hearing and informed everyone that this matter would be continued to allow the Applicant time to have a traffic study completed. 2. Mr. Bruce Cathcart, realtor spoke on behalf of the Applicant. In addition Diane Moser, the designer, Glenda Bangerter, Applicant, and Mike Smith, Engineer, spoke in great detail to describe the project to the Commission. 3. Numerous residents of La Quinta spoke either in favor of or in opposition to the project. 4. Following the public comment, it was moved by Commissioner Mosher and seconded by Commissioner Ladner to continue the matter. PCMIN7-9 4 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Mosher, Ladner, Ellson & Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: None. G. Tentative Tract 26472. Tentative Tract 26473 (EA 90-183) (Vista Santa Rosa); a request of Stuart Enterprises Limited (Craig Bryant) for approval of a specific plan to allow 925 total residential units in 7 master plan villages (or tracts) on 271+ acres, a parcel map creating 6 residential parcels (or villages) on 235+ acres, a tentative tract (26472) creating 130 single family lots on 36+ acres, and a tentative tract map (26473) creating 116 single family lots on 35 acres. :t . Principal Planner Stan Sawa noted this item has been continued from June 25, 1991, and Staff noted revised conditions had been prepared and passed out. He then presented the information contained in the Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. .? . Chairperson Barrows asked Staff if a condition had been added requiring the developer to notify prospective buyers that horses were allowed in the adjacent areas. Staff stated a condition had been added. 3. Commissioner Ellson asked Staff whose responsibility the maintenance of the park area would be. She also inquired regarding the Mello Roos funding. Principal Planner Stan Sawa stated that Condition #6 of the two tract maps should be deleted as the Engineering Department Condition #42 for the two tracts dealt with the matter. 4. Planning Director Jerry Herman explained the Mello Roos process for the benefit of the Commission. 5. Chairperson Barrows opened the public hearing. Craig Bryant spoke on behalf of the Applicant. Mr. Bryant expressed his concern over conditions that he had not been able to resolve with Staff. Those conditions in contention were #10, #12.a., #13, #14, #16.d., #22a.1., and #22.b.1., #26, #27, and #28. 6. Discussion followed among the Applicant and the Commission regarding his lack of response to their concern regarding increasing the minimum lot size and providing parkland space. In addition the Commission questioned the Applicant regarding how the common areas would be maintained, a master homeowner's association, street improvements, financing with the Mello Roos, and Lighting and Landscaping District. 7. As a result of the discussion, nine conditions of the Specific Plan were modified or added, with four changes each to the Parcel Map and Tentative Tract Maps. Those changes are: PCMIN7-9 a. Rather than 24 feet and 30 feet, one story units are to be 18 feet and two story units 24 feet, respectively. b . The condition recommending a maintenance storage area and restroom facility for use by gardeners for the entire project was deleted. C. The Applicant was required to provide a left turn access for Green Valley Ranches on the north side of 52nd Avenue when they construct the raised median. d . All residential lots were required to be a minimum of 10, 000 square feet in size. 8. Mr. Tom Teigon, 50-375 Vista Montana, spoke in opposition to the size of the lots and the house heights. He felt the density of the project would downgrade their property values. :a. Mr. Jack Leeney, 80-800 Vista Bonita, addressed the Commission regarding their allowing such small lots, the height of the houses and he strongly urged the Commission to lower the density of the project. Mr. Leeney requested a two week continuance of the matter. 110. The Commission discussed with the Applicant whether a public park or possibly private parks should be required in -lieu of park fees. Based on 925 units, the Applicant would be required to dedicate 8.3 acres of land for parks. After an exhaustive discussion it was determined that the retention basins provided in the plan would be designed in such a way as to provide usable recreation area no smaller than 1.5 acres, to be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. 1.1. Craig Bryant, Applicant stated that with the money he would be paying for parkland in -lieu fees the City could purchase a large parcel of land. He valued the land at between $85 , 000 to $100,000 per acre. 1.2. Based on the above discussions and the inability to come to a workable solution with the Applicant, it was moved by Commissioner Mosher and seconded by Commissioner Ellson to adopt Planning Commission Resolutions 91-019, 91-020, 91-021, 91-022 recommending approval of Specific Plan 90-202, Parcel Map 26471, Tentative Tract 26472, and Tentative Tract 26473 subject to the modified and added conditions stated above. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Mosher, Ladner, Ellson & Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINING: None. PCMIN7-9 VI. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Jim Morrisey, 25-973 Gertrude Lane, Hemet, addressed the Commission regarding the noticing procedure followed by the City. Based on the problems that had occurred with other tracts, it was suggested that the Staff look into the procedure followed by the County. That procedure requires notification of owners within 600 feet of the site or a minimum of 24 property owners. Commission asked Staff to look into the matter and bring it back to the Commission at a future time. VII. BUSINESS SESSION A. Tract 23269; a request of the Williams Development Company for review of architectural elevations for units to be constructed on 44 lots. 1. Based on the time taken by previous projects it was moved by Commissioner Ladner and seconded by. Commissioner Mosher to continue the matter to the next meeting. Unanimously approved. B . New cart storage screen wall; a request of Von's Market for approval of construction of a cart storage screen wall. 1. Based on the time taken by previous projects it was moved by Commissioner Ladner and seconded by Commissioner Ellson to continue the matter to the next meeting. Unanimously approved. VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. There being no corrections to the Minutes of June 25, 1991, and the Joint City Council meeting of June 25, 1991, it was moved by Commissioner Mosher and seconded by Commissioner Ladner to approve the Minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. ]IX. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Mosher and seconded by Commissioner Ladner to recess this, regular meeting of July 9, 1991, to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 23, 1991, at 7:00 P.M. in the La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers. This meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was adjourned at 1:15 A.M., July 10, 1991. PCMIN7-9 a STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JULY 23, 1991 PROJECT: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR UNITS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON 44 LOTS IN TRACT 23269 APPLICANT: WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOCATION: LA QUINTA HIGHLANDS, LOTS 31-72, 165 AND 149, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ADAMS STREET AND FRED WARING DRIVE. THESE LOTS ARE LOCATED ON SONESTA WAY, VILLETA DRIVE , AROSA WAY AND LA PALMA DRIVE. BACKGROUND: This item was on the agenda of the July 9, 1991 Planning Commission meeting but was continued to the July 23, 1991 meeting due to time constraints. 1. Tract 23269 totaling 255 lots has been developed by a number of developers including Triad (original subdivider of whole tract) La Quinta Vistas and Williams Company. 2. The Williams Company has developed a number of tracts in the northern area of La Quinta including Cactus Flower and Rancho Ocotillo which are located across Adams Street to the east. The attached Design Review Board Staff Report describes the proposal and Staff comments. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING At the Design Review Board meeting held July 3, 1991, the Board made the following recommendations on the above architectural elevations: - Increase shading on side elevation. - Resolve the potential security problem created with the recessed area near the front door on Plan No. 2. - Relocate the fireplace on Plan No. 4. - Provide a third roof tile color selection. STAFFRPT.035/CS -1- RECOMMENDATION: Approve by Minute Motion the Architectural Elevation and color scheme for Tentative Tract 23269, Lots 31-72, 165 and 149, as proposed by the Williams Development Company with the following amendments: - Increase shading on side elevation. - Resolve the potential security problem created with the recessed area near the front door on Plan No. 2. - Relocate the fireplace on Plan No. 4. - Provide a third roof tile color selection. Attachment: A. Staff Report for Design Review Board meeting dated July 3, 1991, with attachments. STAFFRPT.035/CS -2- ATTACHMENT A STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE: JULY 31 1991 PROJECT: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR UNITS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON 44 LOTS IN TRACT 23269 APPLICANT: WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOCATION: LA QUINTA HIGHLANDS, LOTS 31-72, 165 AND 149, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ADAMS STREET AND FRED WARING DRIVE. THESE LOTS ARE LOCATED ON SONESTA WAY, VILLETA DRIVE , AROSA WAY AND LA PALMA DRIVE. BACKGROUND: 1. Tract 23269 totaling 255 lots has been developed by a number of developers including Triad (original subdivider of whole tract) La Quinta Vistas and Williams Company. 2. The Williams Company has developed a number of tracts in the northern area of La Quinta including Cactus Flcwer and Rancho Ocotillo which are located across Adams Street to the east. PROPOSAL: The table below describes the proposed units: # Sq. Footage Unit # Sq. Footage Garage PLAN 1 1470 640 PLAN 2 1805 647 PLAN 3 1686 656 PLAN 4 1818 598 # Stories 1 1 2 2 # Different Elevations 3 3 3 �3 # Bedrooms 3 3 3 4 # Bathrooms 2 2 1/2 2 1/2 3 # Family Rooms # Car Garages 3 3 3 3 """I /I rl /nc • The applicant has proposed six different color scheme combinations using two different roof tile colors, red/brown and beige/brown. Six different alternate colors have been proposed for facia/barge/trim, garage field/louvers and stucco. These are all desert colors. The architectural style used, Spanish/contemporary, is similar to that used for the surrounding tracts. Note should be made that the conditions attached to the approval of this tract require all lots less than 150 feet from Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street to be one story, less than 20 feet in height. This affects approximately 17 of the lots (see attachment #i2). STAFF COMMENTS: 1. Front elevations are attractive and well proportioned 2. Side and rear elevations seem to show sufficient architectural treatment. 3. Eaves overhangs and shading of windows on the sides of units are minimal. Increased shading on windows on the side elevations could be achieved by larger pop outs around the top of windows or by using tinted windows. 4. All units are 50 feet wide and therefore will fit on the smallest lots provided (60 feet wide). 5. Only Units 1 & 2 (one story) will be allowed on Lots 31 to 45 and Lots 71 & 72. Each unit has three alternate front elevations. Staff feels this will provide enough variety of house design on these lots. 6. Only two color roof tiles have been proposed. A third roof the should be used to provide more variety in roof color for the lots along Fred Waring and Adams Street. RECOMMENDATION: Review plans in conjunction with Staff comments and determine acceptability. The Design Review Board recommendation will then be forwarded to the Planning Commission. Attachment: 1. Locality Plan 2. Tract Map 3. Architectural Plans & Elevations Full scale architectural plans attached. nRB7 /3 . F'1 /CS -2- r 11111111 f 11111111111 M I l l 11;�i� set'�NN1lrfltiu ATTACHMENT No. 1 R TR 23269 w w ULES AVENUE 1•f* 1 ?"its i,'i/i"Air�&Ak 3 LOCATION MAP WESTWARD f40 DRIVE 111111 §1111►11001101 IIItI1111,01,00011 ORTH ATTACHMENT No. 2 t,,o+s kim be c3ewelcpe,d blo� LA:oa mts cos N 69'35'/O'E ?6sB 93' ?658 74) �63879'J -co• - —-----�- "1 H ti � tii �9 Im 9u Z02 m r�/za, 804 lb J l 8 „ i1 isfJ 8� Z! 8• s / JZ J1 11 Jf'Ji J41• 1 ooa t P„ c{ STi4-- �+Jfri� - a - E-TA — ra u SI.S1 S/ I IC zzs uo :. b o I z�u lip ttz \ p v V5 ,r 22 a s� "sv fO N K G! K cs o I o • s w' 9J ?i 6 ��,.'I �i'Kt'�i E`1 64 ill ,53 �3+' i Y S1.'a+� n if V,07 46 43 q� -�� e- �-- a IL• tJ� /iz -,$' X . J.�ii'�[t! ri r: l 'l <+ t314f 6;..7 '+7 b G� r: 64 h7 ti r,•� 3 Z 26 ��/ 3 6 _9 P9�1� r�1 - �t '33 G8 cal N8 Q ��J 4 r , a rt, �,.9 .e ,� /rs .v1�: +, e. h t.�L 2e7 /s ,s .o n ,ls rH er 7l p i M► ; ~ /)) /,v tt3 ?eiI •�97'�8 9� �� o'a, rot �: w a ai u.,�,le ,,i Q 73 v Ip wi ia o 1 76 t� (`wW C�1 , ��o tit t9S t: )7 t' �lll�Agla C �► l7j - •-�i4NfTA 412 rre� /a rn ,cv, ,d,acc wtct a +J a >,, u�s�`B P7+n as d� e+ 83 4 j s,�r to o • 2 eo 9') 66a t9 lcse is lqp iS ls' r 1 n (i66o64) I6sd.ss.� 3lt./J'I ATTACHMENT No. 3 EXAMPLES OF HOUSE DESIGNS AND ELEVATIONS rr K vm*oonv� Ivisi +O n jtlpol/lHpiH vikIt10 V1 1 0 02 Le3w*OMA3C twvTj" NYld WOU t -4 - t hyu vw-o *-w3 Nom" VN1IlH61M v1N1i10 vl yM Lw"Usm t*.mur 74 I 4 v N011YA313 i� ME In 0 `� K�° vv�Wana� vi�w►o n T±L NOUVA313 - -- din SONTIMOIN vtNlno vl _ r• t1 _ •OWoo Lmm"Is"d 1asrmus : N Id :1• ri,voonv3 Ntst-0 n 6014YIHDIH dINMO r a I N • 1d DI p SaNVIHDIN ViNino vi t Nw"Id IA 0 tmr0" 3 1„x+M1O I►1 SONY 01H VINino vi IM3 0UA.14IX"111. NOIIVA313 0 t NVId O 90 z F W L �� L od •�uoo ua tnafo t�rrr�ra i NYM - r 11 . , ..• • rsao r'tiuono n NV1d UOOi3 •, • {wrtQ�rtr� l ik�nD lr1 v rfVUL V f .� i� NY �3 'm03 t,tislt�0'Qal4 Sam"w _ I1 as n 4 1 04 r°iMYa IITY� ilkr/Q n SONY1NJtH ViNino vi wt4o* txw*ma NOUVA313 I `JI 11 if rytxr4Mr� Yt�+r�0 n � SONVINDIH viNMO v, L' N'Ybd N J ISO 69 P. _,E;; �►';U 0 K't ' Y � rri •r tir�y v.,w.ry •• Sgt�Y1NJCli MJlNif10 111 '14103 Lx3A49uA30 fAMNA N r7" a�+�ss�►a titkno n J 66N-Vi4l-D-1H —V1-Ni—inojvA .3r_. n v LL t Aa $ NYM ----- 04 P ESE vw*04IW3 *VAAro wl sar�r�oiH v,�r��no v� ^03 urmosoUAJ%,�rc,tra a NVUYAi U 1=4-- 3�i�1 i 6i "I j$; w " . Yl►n0 n s�rtVW66 vlmno vi C-Y-.:_-3 (�it.s�lf � •�soa ��+�o�nse �Rrr,�u NTM 17 C NVId - ;MUV n.�ro.rno �rtrno rt SQNb'�i{JiN YaAtillp Y1 'duo* LKD1 MISA2d tmmm v e HvId N t'riy01n.3 �tKinp 11 SONYIHDIN ViNino vi W02 c4DRii��u0 �ttrt't� f k"" SCNV-I tOIH r1NIAO VI N (>t. vt%313 e . t NYId O h b �'X:ea Stl�1t1N°Jit� Y1.Nit�O Yl `�"°° � � •w�o� as.ou� t+�m� I twtrorra� tiiMnp t1 SONVION VLNInO VI N HouYn313 0 9 NY14 N h vs"ron,-fD 4txr+o trl J NVULVA313 — -- - `t" • MI n *w7 SOd VIRDIH r1HIno vi '002 a may V Ne sa wma NY iA tiW u t NYld lt� V,jtv*AMV3 *Uxr, r saHr�or�+ r�rvi�o r� "�109 lxi�fr1i�70 turrtM+� - Hoi-Lv-= v V HrId F W r' • + • V ru+worrnra ti«+non _ Y N011YA313 10*0:1 psmouk" Inv"& t NV -Id m t -- EJ it, �rw,rC � � 'bifi r'�0 1P1 sowmm viNino vl •ft*' u"o sm"T. NOt1VATU 8 1 Nvid 0 f W \I twuOtnY� lrlxnp h SONTU401 d Vll Ino Yi 'l4®9 f tm4cuAn iayrr" b NTW k rmbicmwa wwno n .—.--..�..s,.,.o. SQN"01H V1NMO V1 WOD LXNWUAM I m a 0 NOUVA313 NYId 1_._ J I Ins-r-O n SoNU uiom Y1Nino Yl '"03 damwisA a tetvrnA NOULVA313 f Nvltld _ I TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 23, 1991 SUBJECT: VON'S SHOPPING CENTER - NEW CART STORAGE SCREEN WALL The Design Review Board has requested that this matter be brought before them for review. Therefore it is requested that this matter be continued to your meeting of August 13, 1991, to give them the opportunity to review the wall and make a recommendation at their meeting of August 7, 1991. MEMOJH.111 1-3 DATE: APPLICANT/ OWNER: PROJECT: LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING ZONING: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: ACCESS: A. BACKGROUND: STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 23, 1991 EDWARD NIGG PLOT PLAN 90-445 51-066 AVENIDA MENDOZA (VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA - SEE ATTACHMENT 1) REQUEST FOR A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF PLOT PLAN 90-445 TO ALLOW CONVERSION OF A DUPLEX UNIT INTO A REAL ESTATE OFFICE WITH APARTMENT (SEE ATTACHMENT 2) REQUEST OF A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION URBAN MIX COMMERCIAL VILLAGE "TAMPICO" SUBZONE THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 3) FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. THIS PROJECT TAKES ACCESS FROM AVENIDA MENDOZA. 1. The La Quinta Village Plan requires all projects which involve construction for conversion, and/or change of use to any non -single family detached residential use shall submit: for, and comply with the result of a plot plan review, pursuant to Chapter 9.182. (Residential and Commercial Plot Plans) 2. This plot plan was approved subject to the attached conditions by City Council on. July 3, 1990 for a period of one year. 3. This applicant has requested a time extension of one year for Plot Plan 90-445 for reasons of illness and the present sate of the economy. STAFFRPT.034/CS -1- RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning time extension for Plot Plan conditions. The new expiration Attachments: 1. Locality Plan 2. Plot Plan Commission approve a one year 90-445 subject to the attached date will be July 3, 1992. STAFFRPT.034/CS -2- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLOT PLAN 90-445 - ADOPTED JUNE 26, 1990 1. Comply with the Parking Ordinance stipulation that no landscaping higher than 30-inches shall be placed within 10-feet of the entry driveway to the parking area. The Heavenly Bamboo located in this area shall be replace by a lower shrub. 2. The parking layout shall be shifted three feet towards the existing building allowing the minimum three feet between the front property 1,ne and the parking area as required by the Parking Ordinance. The distance between the handicap parking stall and the planter alongside the building will then be reduced. The five foot access ramp area of the handicap parking space located alongside this two foot access strip can be combined together to make a satisfactory access area. No curb shall therefore be placed between the handicap space and the two foot entry strip alongside the building. 3. The Applicant shall be required to install a sidewalk along the length of the property excepting for the short section to the north of the entry point into the parking lot. 4. The Fire Marshall has the following requirements.. a. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. b. Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code 503. CONAPRVL.053/BJ 0 [a] i 46 O a O J J V � d4 c-= 0 V4 ATTACHMENT No. 2 i I W I � I �. i �•` a �: o� o '�: � 9 �. i y dZc�Jr::W bQIN::.`J d.! 4 � .r Lu r AU ��