The URL can be used to link to this page

2007 03 20 CC&# 4 4 adja City Council agendas are available on the City's web page @ www.la-quinta.org CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2007 - 3:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING LA QUINTA LIBRARY MULTI -PURPOSE ROOM 78-275 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 (doors open at 6:00 p.m.) Beginning Resolution No. 2007-020 Ordinance No. 435 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Council Members: Henderson, Kirk, Osborne, Sniff, and Mayor Adolph PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CLOSED SESSION - NONE NOTE: Time permitting the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. In addition, persons identified as negotiating parties are not invited into the Closed Session meeting when acquisition of real property is considered. 000001 City Council Agenda 1 March 20, 2007 RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA PRESENTATIONS — NONE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM JIM DUCATTE, DATED MARCH 1, 2007, REGARDING RENAMING THE LA QUINTA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 6, 2007. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED MARCH 20, 2007. 2. RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT DATED JANUARY 31, 2007. 3. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE & EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED JANUARY 31, 2007. 4. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL GOALS. 5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP FOR PARCEL MAP 34959, JEFFREY R. DUNHAM. 000,10 City Council Agenda 2 March 20, 2007 6. APPROVAL OF A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR RAISED LANDSCAPE MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS ON FRED WARING DRIVE. 7. ACCEPTANCE OF ON -SITE AND OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT MAP 29053-1, FIORE AT RENAISSANCE, TRANS WEST HOUSING, INC. 8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION OF ON -SITE AND OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 31852, POLO ESTATES, RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION, INC. 9. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION OF ON -SITE AND OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 31311, WATERCOLORS, SANTA ROSA DEVELOPMENT, INC. 10. ACCEPTANCE OF AVENUE 54 STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO MADISON STREET, PROJECT NO. 2005-1 1, AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 3. 11. ACCEPTANCE OF THE RESTORATION OF LANDSCAPING AT MONTICELLO I DEVELOPMENT, WEST OF JEFFERSON STREET. BUSINESS SESSION - NONE STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT 2007/2008 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2. DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 THROUGH 201 1 /2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (HENDERSON) 2. CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS 3. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 4. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (KIRK) 5. C.V. CONSERVATION COMMISSION (SNIFF) 6. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (RON PERKINS) City Council Agenda 3 March 20, 200-7 " 0 7. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (KIRK) 8. C.V.W.D. JOINT WATER POLICY COMMITTEE (ADOLPH) 9. JACQUELINE COCHRAN REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (OSBORNE) 10. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (HENDERSON) 11. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORT COMMUNITIES CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 12. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION (NANCY DORIA) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY CHILD SAFETY COMMISSION (HENDERSON) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 15. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (HENDERSON) 16. SANTA ROSA/SAN JACINTO NATIONAL MONUMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 17. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (ADOLPH) 18. SILVERROCK RESORT AD -HOC COMMITTEE 19. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE SUBCOMMITTEE 20. ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 7, 2007 21. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 12, 2007 22. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 13 AND 27, 2007 DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. CITY ATTORNEY - NONE 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 A. REPORT OF CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE AND UPDATE ON THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 7. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT - NONE 8. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 9. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 10. FIRE DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT - NONE MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS - NONE RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECESS TO 7:00 P.M. 0 City Council Agenda 4 March 20, 2007 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 7:00 P.M. SESSION WILL BE HELD AT THE LA QUINTA LIBRARY MULTI -PURPOSE ROOM, 78-275 CALLE TAMPICO (doors will open at 6.00 p.m.) 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. PRESENTATIONS - NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing. 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2006-573 AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 FOR THE USE AND OPERATION OF THE SIGNATURE POOL, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865 FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A SIGNATURE POOL FACILITY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA OBREGON, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET SOUTH OF AVENIDA FERNANDO ON THE LA QUINTA RESORT GROUNDS. APPLICANT: CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP. A. RESOLUTION ACTION ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council to be held on April 3, 2007, commencing with closed session at 3:00 p.m. and open session at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. 000005 City Council Agenda 5 March 20, 2007 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Veronica Montecino, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of March 20, 2007, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber at 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin boards at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas and 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on March 16, 2007. DATED: March 16, 2 07 ERON��NTECINO, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices The La Quints City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7103, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangement should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7103. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. 000"0G City Council Agenda 6 March 20, 2007 WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: 9 II./0 BYS & (3II3IS CLUB G!HELLA VALLEV l Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley 42fi00 Cook Street Suite 120 March 1, 2007 a 76 8 mDese' 600A 92211 C 760 776A111 FAX gim ad jduceao&geofcv.org mail gegson@becofcv.m Mayor Don Adolph hawwww.becofov.org City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico BOARD o Umecroas La Quinta, CA 92253 Mike Way, President Douglas Miller, Fire President Dear Don, Judy Vossler, Secretary David A. Pont, Treasurer Brian S. Hamik, Esq., Past President The Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley has immensely enjoyed our Steen Albanese relationship with the City of La Quinta for the past 17 years or more. We are Christopher Alling grateful for all of the support that we have received from the City, and in return CarPh And Anderson Ralrson we hope that we have been successful in providing quality, impactful programs Michael P. Busch for the youth of La Quinta. David Chapman David J. Erwin We would be interested in appearing at a city council meeting in the near on F�e� future, preferably after our major fundraiser of the year on March 18'h, to give Ward Fredericks you a Boys & Girls Club update. If this is of interest to you, could you please Luci Moran wg arrange a date and time? Thanks, Don. Tom Netting Mark Nickerson Foch 'Tut' Pepsis At that meeting, we would also be interested in seeking an endorsement of our Suzanne Powell namingthe La Quintalub the President Gerald R. Ford Boys & Girls Club o club f Greg Raumin Rick Remirez La Quinta. President Ford was a great supporter of our organization and our Ben Rudman board of directors is interested in honoring him in this manner. A precedent Dominique n;� for this exists with the Frank Foster and Palmer Powell Family Clubhouse in Mark D. Simon Coachella and The John Carroll and Jim O'Brien Boys & Girls Club of Indio. Joel stwmg Thank you Don. ON FBohanARD OF p Taus7Ecs Sincerely, Mark D. Simon, President David J. Erwin, vim President Al McCandless, Secretary Ir Les R. Peterson, Treasurer Joe Benitez Jim Ducatte Dennis Modrich RRobes d Bianco Routh FAwards Chief Executive Officer Financial Advisor Kelly Flanagan John Foster Reid Jenkins JD/DM/mu George Kirkjan Richard McClung Mark Nickerson JimStutz U 0 Patty Stulz li The Posii7Ve Place For Kids a A United Way Agency COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated March 20, 2007 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated March 20, 2007 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: Payable Warrants: 72271 - 722931 72294 - 72320) Voids) Wire Transfers) P/R 33737 - 33759) P/R Tax Transfers) 72321 - 72423) FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City M Demand of Cash -RDA 3J4ohnM. Falconer, Finance Director AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 28,766.04 632,782.52 143.00 6,644,017.72 186,191.07 47,335.09 2,169,026.44 $9,707,975.88 $9,448,244.72 $259,731.16 CITY OF LA OUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 02/28/07. 03/13/07 02/28/07 WIRE TRANSFER - WATERCOLORS $103,000.00 03/02/07 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $1,209.22 03/02107107 DEBT SERVICE PMT - AD2000-1 $39,325 00 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT - AD97-1 $13.494.94 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT - 92-1 $6,480.00 03/02/07 DEVT SERVICE PMT - RDA2004 1/2 $2.190.176.02 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT - RDA2003PA 1 $779,604.26 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT- RDA2002PA 1 $929,419.75 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT - RDA2001PA 1 $1,215,358.86 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT - RDA199SPA 2 $166,263.60 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT - RDA199SPA 1 $409,759.62 03/02/07 DEBT SERVICE PMT-1994PA 1 $457,162.02 03/05/07 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS HEALTH $79,641.60 03/05/07 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS RETIREMENT $14,551.81 03/08/07 WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK $182,434.78 03/12/07 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $49,113.66 03/12/07 WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA $17,022.58 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFER OUT $6,644,017.72 I-P0 I I OA 1 I N O O O P M O O O P \ 1 YJ I p O O O M N P N m YI m M O A U61 W O I w H l p In O m P O I x 0 1 M A OO VI O P N m �t m WNW I ur I O m w I 1 > Q m I P a L I 1 c- O M I I O z I I Y I W W I I 6o I I d I I mW 11-Z 1 Zd 1 Zr1 I I-1 1 0 Q I x x x x x x x x x x x x x 1 O I z 1 £ W W I O 1 QK I 000 •O(N1n 00 00 11 co PP OMM 00 00000 �NO.O 00 PP 00 O 1 \ I 000 <) M O 00 00 M M N N P P O N N MIX) O O N O vI 0 d d O m M M 00 00 U 1 W I u 1 I PM NN 00 0 � MM ulln P OInAON OOmOm OHO PP Pd 6 1 zO".11 P�tdd —NM AA 00 •O<t .O vlln M•0o PP OA<ImN mm PV 1 f 1 1 1-LL 1 �N�dP 1£ I 1 WF- 1 1 C W 1 I Z 1 I v 1 I 1 I I I I I I mM O P A A N d 1 I 00 'M O M M MM O mmmm 0000 O M 00 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I Inln Or O O •O �O V MMMM �t �1dd vl vl K 1 I NN .td M N lA N N mm MM vI MMMM V�id�t lA In In vl vl m 1 l M N N M h M N L I z 1 z O uIM d N M M vI NN MMMM MMMM vI O Z 1 O I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 I I 1 1 1 V I 0 d M V V N NNNN N N M0 1 U 1 00 00 00 00 O O 0 O O a lA�Cio 0 0000 0000 0000 O 0 00 z z I Q 1 00 00 0 0 O O O O 00 O ONION NNNN O O 00 Q I 1 •1 M I1 M III III M 4I eI m I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 1 tN�Nt lilt I I 1 1 l i t t lilt 1 1 I 1 t I I 1 ON Y I I 00 00 O O O O O 00 O NNNN NNNN O O 00 00 I I K I I W I I f I I „ 1 I 1 I W 1 1 AA AA A A A A A AA A A A AA W1 1 00 00 O O O O 0 00 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 00 1 I 00 00 O O O O O 00 O NINON MONO O O 00 Y 1 1 NN NN N N N N N NN N NNNN NNNN N N NN u 1 w 1 \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\ \\\\ \ \ \\ W I H 1 MM MM M M M M M MM M MMMM MMMM M M MM U I p 1 \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ mmmm mmmm \ \ \\ 1 1 NN MM M M M M MM M MMMM MMMM M Mmm W 1 1 00 00 O 0 O O O 00 O NNNN NNNN O O 00 00 J I 1 m I I Q 1 1 Y 1 0 0 1 6 I •Z I 6 I d I 1 1 N I 1 1 z I 1 Nd NO A M M M A MM P MMOo O A PP W 0 I W 1 N M P N O O P NN P NINNN NNNN 00-- P 11 O 1 x 0 1 A A I' m A m A m m m A MCI A mmmm mmmm A m m V I V z 1 00 00 0 O O O 0 00 0 0000 0000 0 0 O 00 u 1 0 1 00 MM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0000 0000 O O 00 a 10 1 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 NNNN NNNN 0 0 00 I > I I I u 6 I I N W I 1 W L I 1 -1 J N 6 I I O I I m W I I V z Z W M Q 2 I I F M J M W W W > Z m z Z I 1 > U Q x 0 O I -I p I 1 O 0 d' Z 0 O 1- Z W W F z Z 1 1 N W N 0 1, Q N In W Q £ N M W W 0 1 1 d' C W O 1- > W Q £ C > £ Q I I r O d' V Q Q O r 1- W x 0 O M I= 1 Y 0 z p m 1- .I 0 u rc Ifl Z I O W 1 u LL m C Q O W I p £ I O d' Q W J u A O Y I Z Q I C Z m 1- U N > Z Z Z J N LL Z I w 2 1 U W Q z z x O 0 z Q "Q I> 1 C W W V -1 I -I w O N 7 K O z P J m 1 1 w N O I-1 I -I 1- Y Q f W LL w Q I 1 > Q C 3 O U' 1 O W W UO 1 1 J 1- 2 W I u Z O O W G J J K 1- Q M W J Q Q Q Q O Q 6 1 1 O HLL I N J Z I I O vI m O N m P O P \•O w N l 6' I A e- N 1 0 I P M N V M M M N -i I O I ,MoJ M M M \£ WIZZI M w-1 = 3 1 W I O J I > I •• I I x w W £LLO I I b N M f III `O A m P O N M CQOO 1 1 H N N N N N N N N N M M M M 6K I Y 1 O M M M M M M M M M M M M M 1 U 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N wol-Z W HI WOI d'd'I-IQ 1 xZ 1 A A A A A A A A A A A A A�,q-t��l� i Ili1l aaumlu 1 NPO 1 1 OA 1 1 P O N V O O O O N d O �O P O \ I Y J I O O N M O N O O •D A O •O N N r 1 u Q 1 O 1 W 1 O O N P M O O O 0 r V M W 0 r O I Z I N O N r M W N 0 M N A P O w N Q I u F- 1 M A r- N O �O P N A •O U• W 1 1 Q m I 1 N �O �- •D M � A d 6 Z I I N P O x I I N W O Z I I wl- W I z I I d O I I 6 I I Ow I HZ 1 1- 1 O F 1 O 1<=1 PP 0o In'A 00 00 00 00 0N0I V.t 00 nP� 00 O 1 \1 00 00 NN MM 00 NN 00 00 00 W,- PAWN 11 NN U 1 W U 1 u I uw l AO 00 NN PP MM 00 00 00 M•O , AA dV Q,M •D Mw WW rA Q 1Z.1 AN 00 NN rA MM WW NN �NMW MM NN OMA dlmP 00 1 QO I �M Ar MM a-�Mo O P SDP N AA •O.O 1 f I 1 I NN ONW� MM c Ar V�1 I I Pd•O c- NN PP 1=-01 N 1 N W W I W I I OL w W I I ZI 1 v 1 1 W M V O �Qo I I NN NNN N N 1 1 O �t O O O O O 000 O O NN NNN � � 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 11 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 N M •O M � �D V N NOO �O N MM �0 �0 �0 `O N d' 1 1 N M N N N N M M VAN N } dot NNN M M m 1 F• 1 M N �t M a- r P �1 N N N S 1 2 1 N M M N N •O NMO N N �� MNM N O z 1 0 1 �1 �1 ��I.1 In M N �I.1 •1.1 •1 r Z I 01 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I u 1 M M I I N 0 N 0 000 r NN 00 �f Y 1 u 1 O O O O O O N O a-00 0 Q M 00 000 0 O Z I 41 O O O O O O r O 1,00 O A 00 000 O O c-00 N ATV rMA N P m I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 0 } I 1 O O O O O O O O 000 O O 00 000 O O m I 1 — — — — — — 1 1 C 1 1 W 1 1 H 1 1 r.1 1 1 1 1 w i i r r r r r r r r A r rr Arr r r C I I O O O O O O O O QOOOQ O 0 00 000 O O I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00o O o 00 000 0 0 Y I I N N N N N N N N NNN N N NN NNN N N V I W I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\ \\\ \ \ W I F I M M M M M M M M MMM M M MM MMM M M 2 I Q 1 � � e• � V I c 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\ \\\ \ \ I 1 M M M M M M MMM M M MM MMM "IM 0 0 w 1 1 O O O O O O 000 O O 00 000 O O J 1 1 W 1 1 6 1 1 Y 1 0 0 1 4 1 •Z 1 6 1 6 1 I 1 N I I Z I I P O M M r M MMO O W rr MMO M O 1 W I N O O P N c•N IP ON 00, N O 1 x O 1 W W W M. W A W 0 W W W W A r W W W W W W u I uz 1 O O p O O O o O 000 o O co Ooo 0 O U 1 0 1 O O O O O O O o 000 O O 00 0oo O O Q to I O O O O O O O 0 000 0 0 Oo 000 O o 1 > I I 1 0 2 O 1 1 z W N 2 1 f z W U F cD O Z } w Z z M J 1 I FI 0 O F 2 d 0 z U U 6 W I I Z d } 1- Q ] M I 1 O z 1- 4 K £ N LL I 1 } O as W I 1 1- W 2 W 0 N In U Z I 1 O I 1 S Q J Z 6 m O W C 4 1 1 0 Q 6 rc Z O M 1 d' 1 C O > w 0 u u C N Z 1 O W I d J W C N W 2 d' 1 O£ I r O Y 1 Z Q I J J 0 U Z 2 W W W N N „Z I W Z I Q 1 -10 Q I> I z J U W O P Jp] I 1 M W O S W Q f f 6 41 K C K Q I I O N N U Q 6' N U• Q M W W W U UO 1 I K N J Q J Z Z S 6 H > N N N N 1.J I 1 Q 4 W O O O O K > 6 Q W W W M A ♦Q I 1 u u u u u .., u u u c O c c c O o QQI 1 0 1 LL I I NJZ I 1 P A N O M P N \•0 M N I 0 M �? O 0 M�1J I I �MOJ 100 I \S WIZZI MC Q3 1 W I O J 1 > 1 •• I I W W S O I I M N A W O N M V N •O A 0:00 m m m01 I M M M M m m v d v d J v flOfl011 Q0: I Y 1 M M M M M M M M M M M In da)}Y I U 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W O H z 1 W O I A A r A r A r r r A A A A r A Cd'N412Z1 66UC11 U 1 MOo 1 1 0 O O V O d' O 0 0 \ 1 Y J 1 O O 0 O P d vl In O P O A 1 V Q 1 0 1 W 1 N O .i 0 O M m .t P O m O O I I 0r �t vl O In O N •0 •0 •O M P O 0NL[ Iu I IP V A O N A M N l•! W I 1 d £ 1 I v t- o o I I N O Z I N IILII K 1 M I ILO 6 1 6 1 I ow I Z.I ZCC I z .I 1 0 Q I is iI iI i1 i1 ie iI it i0 iI i1 ie iI I O f 1 z I £ w l 0 1 ¢z 1 00 00 00 ON 00 �tV 00 00 MOOOOInOOO • O. n- 00 O 1 \1 00 00 00 O.OdAw hh NN •G�NO� .v. �OONP 00 U I W V I . . V I UN 1 NN 00 dd CONDO 00 MM Om mO� InAN•Om0 MOM, OW 00 Q I ZI-11 vIt NN Ne-NI-O In vl 00 vl vl AA�NM.tOM•O OPMM PP 00 Wo NN N N M M M N N f 1 I HLL 1 MM I £ 1 N N IWFI I ¢ w I I Z I I v I I I I I I 1 1 O O O P M M N N N N N N N N N P O 0 0 1 I �f �I �I YI YI YIM Vlm O 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l t lilt I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I III I I I I 1 1 O 1 O N M b MMM O 6' I I O O N NNNN v d YI M M . M W 1 I . . . . . . . . . . m 1 I N N N MMMM m Z £ I 1 N N N —4- M M M YI WI MMMMMMMM NNE N N z 1 o 1 M .I 4 In .I •I �t V �1 N Z 1 O I 1 I I I I [III I N N N N I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I II I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I III 1 1 I U 1 O O O NNNN if,N M M, M coo O 0 Y 1 V 1 O O O 0000 N N N O O O OQOO OQQ O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 Z I Q I O O O 0000 A N O O O 00000000 000 O 0 6 I I Ih N A M M NNNNNNNN MMN O O m I I I I I lilt 1 1 1 I I IIIIIIII III I 1 I I 0 >• I 1 O O O 0000 O O O O O 0 00000000 0 0 0000 000 O 0 m I 1 e- c• '• ��e-� �t �t e- � � �� a-c•a- N � � I I w I I H I 1 x 1 I N 1 1 W 1 I A N N NNNN N A N N N NNNNNNNN AAA A N m 1 1 O O 0 0000 O O O O 0 00000000 000 O 0 1 1 O O O 0000 O O O O 0 00000000 000 O O Y I 1 N N N NNNN N N N N N NNNNNNNN NNN N N V I w 1 \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \\\ \ \ w I F I M M M MMMM M !II M M MI MMMMMMMM MMM W1 M u u 10 I \ \ \ mm m \ \ \ \ m \m\\\\\\ \\\ m \ I 1 M M M MMm M M M M MMMMMMMM MMM M w I I O O O 0000 O O O O O 00000000 000 O O J I 1 m I 1 Q 1 1 T I O O 1 Q I •Z ] 6 16 I 1 I On 1 I 1 z Z I I M A O NNNN M m d N t00In OQm N O w 0 1 w 1 N P P P P P N P O N N 0000 O O O O O O O O P O W O O IZOI O A 0 O A O O O OOOOOOOO NWW O O u I V Z I O O O 0000 00O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 O 0 V 1 0 1 0 0 0 0000 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 O 6 10 1 O O O noon O O O O O 00000000 000 O O I > 1 I 1 6 I I £ u I 1 O Z I 1 U ry 6 Z Z I I K O O V 1- Z N u < O S N Q 1 I M Q O M I C 1 £ 1-(0 Z Q Z ti 1- w YI I O W 1 z W 2 O K W N M d' 1 1 N O Y I mQ I z W Y LC u z N N LL Z I w Z 1 U• Q N d' W w W �-I F• . ¢ I> I 2 f Z W O m 1- IY I- I- F P J m 1 I Q Q 2 > 3 Z W w C] W U V 0 1 1 u w [C W Z Y 6 6 £ V m Q 3 d m I O Q CC W I A I O 4 6 1 1 O LL I I NJZI 1 A `O V N M O M N V vl A m \•DN 1I A III M O A N m VI M P m = M J 1 0 0 I M MI IMI m m N M M �O V O M t-n O J I o O I M M M M N N \£ WIZZI M U Q 3 I W I O J 1 > I W£LLOI I O P 0 N M d N •O N m P O M Q OO 1 1 Qw I Y 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M Y.m>Y I U 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N WOHZ 1 w01 A A N N N A A A N A A A A d d V m I U I d Po I I OA I 1 O O O O O N O O O O < N O \ I YJ I O O m O O A O O O O M N �0 r 1 U Q 1 0 1 W 0 1 N O M O O O P O O O P N O O 120 I r r O O O m O O N N N .f W N C I U H I `O A O N N < N N N 0 W 1 1 6 m I I m o z I I O Z I I I I I ww I I 6O I I 6 I I ow I AZ I H m I Z M I I 0 Q 1 it it it it �t I# dt �t K it i[k M Y I O /- 1 Z I £ W 1 S 1 QW 1 00 O O O 00 00 0000 O N N 00000 00 00 00 m M< N N <� M O o O 1 11 00 . . . mm 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 00 00 <M H1 �O .tAd•0 . I W U 1 V I Uv+ I NN 000 MM 00 OOoo 000 Q 1I ZQMo II •D <�0 t00 00 00 NN f n Orn AA 00 NNOO 000 lnol`w 00 00 NN mnN NN WO mM< nn .NOO ONN nONW< NN NN NIml^ NP �? 1F 1 fLL I Pmm m� <MO N< m NN < N 1 E I I wF- I I 2 I I v I I I I I I 1 M met 41'N OV AAMM N M O �N N 000 O 1 1 d No O O 000 <O OOnn O O O Vo N 000 I 1 I it I I 1 1 1 11 fill I 1 I III I III 1 I 1 M lwl ' < N NNN dd NNMM M1 M O MN 000 N K I 1 M MM N .t NNN MM mmdd M N O dN d M W • • • . . . • III 1 z I N N v N N N M M N E 1 1 N N M 0 0< M M MNN N mMM N mm N J 1 0 1 .1 1 �1' �1 1 1 1 �1 I �f �g i V l �I �I 1 b 1 •1 NNN 1 Z 1 01 1 I I 1 1 11 1 I I gill I I 1 1 I 11 1 I I I I 1 u 1 M NN < MNMM M < O NM N 000 M Y I u 1 0 00 O N N 00000 0 0000 0000 O O 0 00 0 000 z I a 1 0 00 o 1' o00 00 NNNN 0 0 1' 0 00 0 00o r m I I 1 1 1 I I 11 1 I I 11 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 0 ONO 00 Y I I O 00 O O 000 00 NNNN O O O 00 O MM� O I 1 K I 1 W I 1 F I I M I 1 1 I U• 1 1 W I 1 r rA r A 0rr 00 n A A Ar n 00 A C 1 1 O 00 O 0 00000 0 NO 000 O o 0 00 O 0000 0 1 1 O 00 O O 000 00 NOON O O O 00 O 000 0 Y 1 I N NN N N NNN NN NNNN N N N NN N NNN N V 1 w I \ \\ \ \ \\\ \\ \\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ w I H 1 M MM M M MMM MM MMMM M M M MM M MMM M U I o 1 \ \\ \ \ \\\ \\ \\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ I 1 M MM M M MMM MM MMMM M M M MM M MMM M W 1 1 O 00 O O 000 00 NNNN O O O 00 O 000 O J I 1 m I 1 Q 1 I Y I O O I N t Z 1 m 6 0 1 O 1 1 N 1 I r I Z 1. I N ow O MMM from MMMM 0 O M 00 O 000 n 1 W 1 N P P < NNN NN NNNN < O N < < o O I ZO I i0 rn W m mmm mm mmmm m m m MIX) 00 wow m U 1 u z 1 O 00 0 0 00C, O o N 0 o o O 0 0 00 0 000 0 u 1 0 1 O 00 0 O Ooo 0o OOOo 0 0 O 00 0 000 0 4 10 I O 00 O O 000 00 NNNN O O O 00 O 000 O > 1 I 1 2 N 1S x I J £ W I I Z O W z I 1 w x m m u V w z 2 1- 1 C) r 1- W 1- 1 y LL Q 1- < E Z 1 Z Q Z O w W I I m o u o z e3 > > u 1 I -I N w0 O H w Z 1 I N C U• d' W M 1 1 U W Q Z u m I 1 Z Z Z N z 1- Q I 1 > 1- w U u Q W J M w I K 1 W u f Z m U o W u 1- it, Z I O W 1 �-I O £ u m Z C F- Z J C I o£ I w O E O Q 4 O Q 4 n O Y I Z Q 1 0 Z O K u 1:J S N Z N ry LL Z 1 W Z I z u O u Z H Q 1> 1 N Q N < M W O N Vl W LL P Jm I 1 m 6 w N m 6 m J 0 J V 6 1 1 0 4 Z W Y m O U• Z w w V o l I U N Z Q 2 K Q O S m z 2 of I Q Q O w Q W W O O S 6 r I 1 I I I Y Y Y J J J J E E Z O Q 1 0'. I W1 I N M b N N r m P O N M z 0 0 000 1 1 b N d V �O �0 �0 N N n 1� r n N o LLI Y 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M YY I U 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W O. 1 SZ I Z I W O I 1'n 1' r A n n n A I, r n r F I ,Ll,um �� a a u m 1 u I J� J 4 NPO 1 I On I 1 O P O O 0 O O O N \ I Y J 1 N .O •p O O n N d n n IUQ1 O O I SoI I W 1 N W N O d N N P a0 W P N N N N N �O N WNW IUI-1 �t M 1•J W I 1 z 0I 1 I 1 1 W I 1 WC I 1 60 I 1 a 1 = 1 ow I Z 1 „La Imwl 1 0 Q 1 at is 'K it ♦< X is # it 1 O I z I£w1 0 I<Wl000000000000000000 PP 00 000 00 a0NM0 000 00 NN n O I \I 000 00 'MOOOn ONN .id An M U IWUI u 1 Zum .I ONNNOnNNOr000NrnNN Wo 000 �f �} W,m VN ONN PP Wm O 6 1 ZM I •Om�V�ON Vr-NP N`ONM•ONAP mm ma0 AmN NN mr-r-NVN nP�O NN 0 0 11- I �t �t c•M�imP��O `O P�tNNNr-N �t MM NN de-�O r-� N NVn MM 00 m l l 1 1 N N NN 1.01 NN IE I W w I CL I ZI I I � I I I I I 1 1 AOAOArrAdrOrnOnnO M MM m nNit A O 1 I O�O�OOOOOO�OOr-00� M O .td 000000000 NO O O �f I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 NNNNNNNNdNNNNNNNN MM O NNUNNN ` MMMMM NMm Ca 1 I MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM N N �t �t �f N M V m 1 £ 1 ZI NNNNNNNNMNNNNNMM�O N N NNNNN NM N 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 N N N 1 1 1aN N N N 11 �t �i �l �I �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V et �I N N Z 1 OI 11111111111111111 1 1 11 I I1111 11 11 1 1 M o0 N NNNNN Nit a O Y 1 U I Nit �f �}NNNN OHO �O .O •D �0000 O 0 00 ONNNN 00 O N O z 1 QI AArrrrrrornnnr000 0 0 00 0' nrrnA 00 o n o Q 1 I �r-�r-� �Ar•e�e•r-�rA`O M N 00 M MA d O m 1 1 11111111111111111 I I 11 I I1111 11 1 1 1 } 1 l o0000000000000000 0 0 00 0 00000 00 0 0 0 m 1 1 JVV�t Vet V �t ��t �t �t dot r-r-� r• e- NN � dd�Y �fd �� d N 1 1 to 1 1 w I 1 f I 1 M I 1 I 1 m 1 W I I AnnAnAAAAAAAArArA n A Ar r nA n A 00000 A ¢ 1 1 OOOOOOOOO00000000 O O 00 0 00000 00 O O O 1 1 00000000000000000 O O 00 O 00000 00 O O O Y 1 1 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N N NN N NNNNN NN N N Al V Iw 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \\\\\ \\ \ \ \ w If 1 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M M MM M MMMMM MM M M M 2 16 1 V IC 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \\\\\ \\ \ \ \ 1 1 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M M MM M MMMMM MM M M M W 1 1 00000000000000000 0 0 00 0 00000 00 0 0 0 J 1 1 m 1 1 Q 1 1 } Io=I Q 1 •z I d 16 1 1 1 N 1 1 z 1 2 1 as 1 rrn000000000000rr M M aDM N a 0a0 mm 00 O M O 0 IW 1 00000000000000000 m N PN O PPPPP W N O 120 I a0a000 00 00000 0a000aa0 ap 0 00 0 00000 oa a0 0 0 V IUZI 00000000000000000 0 0 00 0 00000 00 O O O U 10 1 00000000000000000 O O 00 0 00000 00 O O O Q 10 1 00000000000000000 O O 00 0 00000 00 O O O I> I I I W I I 1- I I V I I H Z I I W H £ 0 N I 1 U 2 O W Vl I 1 Z N U } H > z u I I H C J > 6 W Q 1 1 H Z f Q N O S N Z [owl J W 2 m U• W 6' K 1 C£ 1 = Q W u O Y dl 6 Z r OY I ZQ I -1w OC Z 6' Q Q z N LLZIWZI Q J .a 6 J Y Z J -1Q P J m 1 1 U O O O Z ae Q 1 1 M W m d' W w d' V O 1 1 1-1 f 3 w J m W Q of 1 Q Q W O U E < 0 W A 4K 1 I z Z Z Z Z O O 6 6 6 o QQI O HLLI I N J Z I I O M N N O �t d P •O m \.O M N I � I N P n •D V •O `O n MdCFJ 1 0 I N •O M O N O M M �D 0 1 M r- N N I= WI= M M N 2 I MOQ31W I O J I > I w•• I w £LLO I 1 d N •D n a0 P O N mQoo I 1 r r n n n n m w m A I Q K I Y 1 M M M M M M M M M � �� J dm}Y I U 1 N N N N N N N N N N 14 wol-z I wo 1 n n r r n r r r r r W W.+QI xzI 66VmIU 1 •OPO I I On 1 1 A m P O O P O N O O N O O r 1 u Q 1 . O 1 W 1 O n �1 In O N m O M EO O O 1 20 1 m O M P VI N M m P O m W I I 6 m I I r•• N O s� M P M 6 Z I I n N O J I I O Z I I I I I wm I I 6o I 1 6 I —1 Ow I rZ l Z6' I ZH 1 z I O H I Z 1 £ W 1 0 1 Qd' I r PP 00 0000 PP 000 MN 00 Oo NN 00 00 O O I �I m. . .M. . . . . .Nr •G �O 00 000 . M. . . . . NI, 00 00 O 00 00 AA U 1 W U 1 U I UN 1 O N Nmww AOOOP�tOVmA In In 0000 ONN mm 00 In mm 00 O 6 1 ZH I �t InM OInMmM�00 mm PP Ovf ln OIn e-.p dam? •O �D M PP 00 In 1 Qc I m �t M•O e- M e- d �� ON�nA NMM AA PP �t �1 00 f I P 00 MM PP MM I Ho I NMa-A NN 1 S 1 I W I I Kw I I Z I I v I I I I I I I "OoNoom In a N mm O •O O m P O I I O �� O O N O O M O O O O O M M V O N In O O I 1 IIIIIIIII I I III I 11 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 M•O .O �OMa-M M•O O VI Y1 Y1 Y1 `O MM N M O d' I 1 NNNNNNNNM m N V�iV 1!. .. O M �1 . m 1 f l In N , N M M lnm m £ 1 Z I N N N M N N N N �O N N N Ifl N 1 0 1 �} �? �1 ��1��.t �1 �1 N N N �} Z I 01 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 V I 0000e-� 00,n NAin y I u 1 0000o o NIM10 O 00 O O O 0 0 o O S 1 a 1 000000000 O O A n A O 00 O O O O O o O Q I I M N M AN O M M O m I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 000000000 O O 000 O 00 O O O O O O O i rArrArArA r A 0 r rr r n r r r n r I 000000000 O O 000 O 00 o O O O O O 0 I 000000000 O O 000 O 00 O O O O O O O I NNNNNNNNN N N NNN N NN N N N N N N N H I MMMMMMMMM M M MMM M MM M M M M M M M c 1 \ \ \ 1 m m m m m m m m m MMMMMMMMM M M m MMM m m m m M MM m m M M m m M m M M m M M m 1 000000000 O O 000 O 00 O O O O O O O 1 O O 1 I •Z 1 1 6 I I 1 1 m 1 woomm MMMM I W 1 O.00NNNNNN l xol Ammmmmmmm I V Z I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 000000000 10 I 000000000 1 > 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I W I 1 2 I 1 H I 1 1 I � 1 I W 1 1 V Q I I LL 6 M Z I OW I 6 d' I CE I Z A O Y I Z Q I Q U• N LL Z I W 2 1 J Z H 6 1> 1 6 H P Jm I 1 H 6 I I W Z uo1 I s H m l I o z n mod• 1 I 6 d o as 1. 1 O H LL I I NJZ I I N M MdOJIO I ' M O J 1 no 1 N N \£ W I Z Z I M m Q 3 1 W I O J I > I O •• 1 1 W01 M V d'<0 O 1 1 a0 m 6C I Y I M M d U• Y I U I N N W O fZ I W O I r A C KHQ 12Z 1 a dumlu I M m •O �O �O N In M d N P NNN O ON m A n om mm m 0 0 nO on 0 0 O non O no 0 0 0 non 0 00 0 n D n m P O m m m m m P M M M M M M N N N N N N r n A r r r m P A 0 0 0 n d In •O P P P I 1 I I O n n O O d N P N N M 1 YJ I O M n O O P m N P M n lu¢I I O M M M N n N I SO I N M N O .T b O N d M O 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I � 1 I r Z 1 I Z w 1 I O r 1 I£ W I I I 14¢ 1 O nn nn OOOOoOOO 00 f �t OOOONr-nnbPMb�1N PP NN NN MM I \I O M M n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oa P P N M O M M b N N n b P A A M N N P A M M n n W V 1 I U1 O Wm d N NN O N N N O 00 M M n b P b M d n M O A M 0 �t M M M N N n n N N I Z- I N M M MIN M n O A b r-O V d b b b O M 0 P b M b N M M N O N N d d M M 00 nn I w O I I £ 1 I W r I I LL W 1 1 Z I 1 1 1 I 1 1 N MMMMMMM 1 1 O N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 M d M 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 b M M M M M M M M b b b b b b b b b b b b b b M M M 1 1 N N M M M M M M M 1 r l M ddd�t t .tV �fNNN��-NInM M�-� r- N 1 Z I M NNNNNNN N N Nr-�r-r-M Mr-c-b bMM N I 01 I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I u l NNNNNNN M O -00000000 M O O N I u l 0 O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 O O O O 1 al o 0 0000000 0 0 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 I 1 �'• n NNNNNNN M O NET V�iNnnOt `Obnn M O O d I 1 I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 M I 1 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t- aaa 000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I 1 I I '- e- �� N ��s-a-a-N �r•a-a••� � Ifs N e- I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n I I O 0 0000000 O O 0000000000000 O o O O 1 I O O 0000000 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 1 I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1 W 1 \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ I r I M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 1 p I \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ 1 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 1 I O O 0000000 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O I 1 1 1 O O 1 1 •Z I 16 1 1 1 N I W W 1 O O I S O 1 M M l uzl o 0 1 0 1 O O 10 1 0 0 I > 1 I I I ll I I Z I I I I m I I £ a I 1 0 M I K 1 J N Z low[ 6 Z O 1 Z 1 2 1-O Y Iz Q I N O N u Z I W Z I � w ¢ 1 > I p P J m 1 1 Z Q 1 1 Q N U O 1 1 J 01 I O � O Q Q I I O NJz I 1 N O \bwN11 n b MdOJI0 I M n r M O J I O I M \£ W IZ Z I M 9Q3 1 W I O J I > I p •• 1 I W Z LL O I I b n OEQOO 1 IP P QOC I Y 1 M M Z1- 0 . I V 1 N N W r I W 0 1 n n s e:wa l xz l daumlu I MMMMMMM M M MMMMONNr-r-�t .T Mgt N N N M 0E00 M n 000000000 M M M n 000000o 0000 O O 00000 OooO000000000 0 0 0 0 0O00000 0 0 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 W M Q w > z Z 6 } c Q a u u w > ee z u 4 W l0 w 0 > 6 Z fIl O w N S N tJ r 1' M W w Z Y £ N w W O r O Z 6 O 10 m > 6 r Z O Q W Z N N Z N W J O W W Z J Z r J J Z W w V O Z 6 6 Z J W X Q Q Q W O Z £ N N N N N N N r O M M < M t M M } O N N b M N n n r n n n n r mPo 1 I Or 1 1 O O m M O O N �t O 0 0 N \ I YJ 1 O O M O O V O 0 O m A l u 6 1 O N M O O O �O O 1 x01 O N O m P O N .O O O N N WNm 1 uF I c- N P O O P •O O N A m W 1 I LL F 1 1 0 7 I 1 O Z I 1 1 I 1 ww I 1 6 O I 1 WW IfZ1 Z C I Z H I H 1 o Q I it �c K itIc it is it it ie it i1 H 1 O I Z 1 £w I 0 1 Q K I 00 0 0 O A N N O N P m M M 0 0 00 O N N ' NV 00 00 00 M P W 0 .. O 1 \1 00 00 Ps-P�P Opt cMM 00 00 O�t 00 00 00 MO(Or N4 MOO V 1 W V I . u 1 uw I IINOO�NN AA 00 0�0 � mNM 00 00 00 mN N 6 1 ZH 1 00 NN PN n•O. a mwo omo mm PP 00 ONN PLOO 00 00 NN OMOMNoN Fo i �� NN e- �M P 00 �� .f •DO NOP �O �D 00 NN N ADO BONA 1fLLl NN NN N 1 HO 1 1 F I I w f 1 16' W I 1 Z 1 I v I I 1 O �f MAD •O �OMMV O O O 00 mm N N I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 O M •O �O �O .O �O .O �O N O 00 MM N M M MMMMMM �O I F 1 N �t mN P P N I Z I M M M M M M M M N �t N N N M I O I m M �1 �1 �1 .1 M M NM �I 1 O I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 11 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I U I O M M M M M M M N O O Oa m m N O O O O O O O O 0 I U I O O 0000000 O O O 0 0 0 o O O O 000000 0 I Q I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 000000 O O M N N M O O O O O O O O n I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I N O I 1 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 O O O O A O O O O O O O I 1 �" e' ��t-e'•�e� � � e• �� N N NNNNNN � I W F Q O 001 •Z I 6 I r r NNNNNrr r n n nn nn n r n rnnrnr r o 0 0000000 O o 0 00 o0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 000000 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\\\\ \ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M e• t- t- � \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\\\\ \ M M M M M M M M M M 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 00 O O O 000000 O O m NNN0000 t• �1 Op aO mm m t• O NNNNNN N P 000 ... e- IN P P P P P 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m n m m m m m m m m m m A n n A A m m m m m m m m m 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 O O o 00 o o O O O O o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 o000000 0 0 0 00 00 O o 0 000000 0 N 1- CC Z } W W J u o F a u u Z H a 6 z z H > H 1 I H H Q O > N I I N N Z Z W 6 W GS 1 I ¢ W p O H Z H W Q U 1 I U Z O H H U Z Z K O 6 1 I 0 H x ¢ 0 m O CC V W CC M 1 I Z f/1 K m J J £ N W H N Z 10 W I Q W 6' Z h l N F- Z 0 1' 1 O£ I O 3 Q W N (a J Q Z 6 W O n Y 1 Z Q I m w LL H H ry LL Z 1 W Z I Z X 3 } W W W 2 Q H 6 1> I O Z W 0 J } m Z Z [[ 3 P Jm 1 I J N N O m W Q O O W W UO 1 1 O 4 ¢ H J m N J N H 1 1 2 2 0 [C 1' d' CC 6 O W Z = A > > > 3 3 O Q 6 1 I O f LL I 1 NJZ I 1 A N n m N P n N P m O P MV�JI0 I M r-MOJ I o01 M M M M N M M N r- \F W I ZZ I M m Q 3 1 w I O J 1 > 1 0 •• I 1 W£ LL O I 1 r m P O � N M �t N •O A m .y- sC � o�� 1 sm}Y I U 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N W OZ I W O I A A A A A r A r r' r A A A rcc.¢1xz1 LL dumlu 1 P P O I On I 1 O N O O O �Y d \ 1 YJ 1 r o o h 1ua1 O I W /- 1 M O O O N �O •O O I Z O I N N N N N WNW I UI- I 0 n O O O O W I I O Z I I I 1 N N I W W W I 1 dp I 1 6 I z I t0W IFzI I � 6 I k it it ie M IOHI z Z I £ W I 0 1 Qa I O Nn 00 00 00 o I \1 rr 00 00 u Iwu1 U 1 UN 1 N OOO 00 00 NN M M Q oz.[ NN MM W W 1 ac1 o nn as ao ro H 1 1 1 N hh NN W W I -n101 b b 1 £ 1 I WI- 1 IMWI N N I Z I I � d O I M O O N N 1 M M 1 I m m v z I M M N d N O I d d M d O I 1 U I N N O N u l O 0 0 0 6 1 O O O O I r r r N 1 c 0 1 O O O O 1 W I I n n r h 1 1 O O O O Y 1 I N N N N V 1 W 1 \ \ \ \ W 1} 1 M M M M S 1 6 1 U 1 O 1 \ \ \ \ I I M M M M W 1 I O O O O J I I 0] I I 4 1 1 } 1 O O 1 Q 1 •Z 1 6 1 d 1 I I N 1 1 } 1 Z 1 I V V d d O 1 W W 1 N P O 12 0 1 W a0 a0 h u I uz 1 O 0 0 0 u In 1 0 0 O O 6 10 I O O O O 1 > I I 1 a u 1 1 } 4 J 1 1 J J 1 1 6 U I I 6 N U V I I N D) y y eL 6 6 z 1 1 Z 1 1 Y w 1 Iu z z U W O c W Q 1 O > W K Z 1(1 Z I O W I W W O 10£ I W O W W N W Z n Y I Z Q 1 F O z N W Z I W Z I Q Z Y W - I Q C Z P Jw W 1 1 W G W Q W Q 1 1 H J Z U Z UO I 1 J Z O U• I I 2 J O n 4 1 I 3 3 3 3 } o aa1 I O MV a J Io N I P N M N N , M O J I O I M M M \£ W IZ Z I M U• Q 3 1 W I O J I > I o •• I I W£ W 0 1 1 P O N M ¢QOO I 1 N N N N Q o: I Y I d U• Y Y I U I N N N N N W O F Z I W O I r r n n r K K M Q I S Z I 6dU4) I U I :poCP7a v � 1 I p 1 I w 1 I N Z 1 W 1 0 H O 1 W I O I S I a 1 pal a IFz 1 1 LL Q I 1 W S I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 SOP O O O O O o o O P P OM M O O OO OdNO O I Y I EOM 0 m m O O O O M M N N P P ON N aD a0 lna In OddO w a0 M I wZ1 I Z I NN O O 0 0 M M N M GOP A nAN OO]OO 0O I S0 I �N m M r n O O �O •O Gn M M�0 O P P oA•O w aO N mae-N GO d I UO I �M d •O �O GO a0 M M � � N M � � MHO N•O P � I £I I I I A I I O I I O I I N I I \ 1 I M I I I \ 1 1 M 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 I a W I 1 W O F 1 1 N \ c I I w it i1 K i1 it u {1 {1 O it K it I I 6 C Y I I UY J J J J J W J J w J J J U I I > 6 Q 6 Q Q X 6 wm Q W a a Q W I 1 MY 0 Z H 0 0 N 0 W 0 NN 0 0 U x I I H O O O O O W O O W W O f O O O N FU 1 1 YH F H F f H H H Y F HH F W F 1- H 1 N 1 1 H U H J LL J J J J J N H 1 1 H 1 0 6 0 0 0 6 C 0 JJ 0 N 0 0 QQ« 0 W J 1 z 1 CCU O J O O O 6 O O O 00 O 3 O O HHHH O H r 1 01 J> p J p p p -1p xx O W O p ZZZZ p J JzO 1 HI VN Z W 3 Z Z N Z 1 Z 00 Z Z 2 YYYY Z WWWW Z 1 I 1 W W U W Q W W W £ W UU Ill W UW 6'LC LC 6' W 6 >N I £M1 N} y Z y y N y y N y -1-1> N y Wwww > y w O\ I W.1 F < 0 W 1- 6 6 W x x x x £ L L S N M, I "V I £H U H H J \\ H UUUU 6'000 1 6 1 H 0 1 W K 0 J LL < 0 0 J 0000 O O m <\ I N 1 W u w O 6 LL p O O 6 Z Z Z Z LL LL LL £ 4M 1 W I N U W O 6 Q Z 00 LL QQQ< HHH H O I al N -1w 0' Q JJ 7 JJJJ ZZZZ W mw W I I 7 m N W > mm LL' CC.. I I OLL 1 1-0 I 1 GOO O P A A dddd Anna N 1 1 O M d M M O MMMM OOOO O 11 01 pN 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 zQ I 1 Or O MMMM dddd •O W I 1 dd M Yf N V1 MM VI MMMM dddd Y1 x 1 I x I I N M InM d N M M M NN MMMM MMMM N I I dd M d d d d dd d dddd dddd d I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I IIII I I f 1 O d M d d d N N N N N M M d d N 00 0 I Z 1 0 0 O O O In O O O o o O o O O O I 0 O 1 00 O 0 0 O O O O O N O O N O O O O o 1 OZ 1 MA M to n n M Il1 VI raaA ArAA M 1 U 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I u 1 I < 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 NNNN NNNN 0 I 1 I I w I r n n r a A A A A A i n n r n A A A A r I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o H o 0 0 0 O o O o O I awl 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 00 O O o o o o o o O O I \1- 1 NN N N Al N N NN N 'NNNN NNNN N I Y Q 1 \\ \ U\ \ \ \ \\ \ Q\\\\ \\\\ \ I U p I M M M Z M M M M M M M U M M M M M M M M M 1 W 1 rr r Hr r e• t- rC' r Hrrrr I x 1 \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\\\ \\\\ \ I U I M M M N M M M M m m M W M M M M M M M M M 1 1 00 0 W O O O O 00 o £ 0 0 0 0 0000 O 1 Y 1 N Q 1 Z 1 000 O K O O O O 00 O 0000 W O o o O O 1 In I W O O O =0 O O O -00 O 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O A Q 1 1 U Z W 3 F- H Q N -1 I H J H W > Z 0 Z I 1 > U Q x H w 1 •0 1 H Z 0 1-Z w F 1^ N 01 O Z 1 w N O Q N N LL 1 1 N Y Z H W Q £ N H Gp H I LL 1 p W O H > 6 £ U Q Q 0 f <I=W=l HnO -,a OM M ZM ON <mmmNN HP Hdddd OMOMO uO U I£ W 2 I Hl•w U LL N U• O w 0 P < N N OP w N N N N LL O o O A 1 Qx I KA0 'r o Qo WO J00 UN W0a0000 Ho Woro o O <1 Z U I U 0 0 ILL O Z O m O 1-0 u 0 O O N O > 0 0 0 0 Z O O O O Z O O 1 N p 1 Y Q w w MPH I p 1 4 3 O 01 O W W p HMO I Z 1 H x W I U Z O O 6' p J \MO I W 1 p J £ Z f 6 K < 6 M£ 1> 1 Q < 6 Q < CO m m O) U U O < 1 1 J 1 a.. I W I N, P W£LL I OU I MAn GO b GO Ad GO O N N P <w 1 zH 1 O00 m P N da O m AGO�PO "a <0 I 00 1 OIn MM ow m dO 00 MA•O M M.... ONNNN NO LLU• } 1 p>Z 1 Odd 0, ao am OV ON QUN a - ONNNM ow�m� w OF- I ZZ 1 Odd Om 00 OM O0 On ONVI 00 ONNNN OGO. NG Mnp Pi 1.{� y Ix[ u 1 WH 1 Odd OM OM 00 00 ON O• - 00 0-In-- OAPAP `CI O.Mv dau 1 > 1 Odd ON ON ON Or ON Orr Or O��-�� 0---< 00 1 1 O P P OPO P O O O O O O O O O O ONO 1n d d I Y I M O O 000 O O 0 N N M M O O 1n In O O O O I uHl I Wzl �O P P Prd O O O In P P M M O O O O O O PLOW r r 1 2� 1 �t t0 CO P A d N O O N N N r r M M CO a0 N N M N �0 CO M M 1 £ I 1 Q I N N •0 �D � � CO N O �O I I �OdP 1 I d1n N 1 r 1 1 O 1 1 O I I N 1 I \ 1 I � 1 I 1 I \ 1 I M I O 1 I 1 I 1 I W 1 I N f 1 I H W W O 1 I k K Z w 2 1 I wSw W Q dww Y 1 I J J ZNZ J J J J J w J J J J J J W 1 I 0 0 www Y Z 0 0 W 0 0 d f 0 1 0 NNN M 0 S 1 1 O O NWN O W O 0 6 0 O d 0 z 0 I O 6Q O O F- N 1 1 J O O U Y J N W O 6 6 J 1 Z 1 O Q O C6O O 6 O O > O £ O W O O C O KF-H O O r 1 01 z L C 1 E 1 O C O Z C z U z Z C G W N N c G JO 1 wl Z Z YWY Z 0 Z Z W Z W Z Z S Z N Z LL Z Z QO 1 f l W f W www W O W W I W 6' W W U W W woo W W >N 1 £dl > 2 > WNW > u > N > N > > 0 > W > U > WOO > N > O\ 1 W.1 U• p W C U W W W I H w = N W KM 1 FCC 1 1 O w N I d' w 6� 1 wUl Z OJO d' J J Q 0 N O mww J 6\ 1 N 1 6' d•66' 0 6 6 W £ J w LLLLL d QM 1 W 1 W d 6 J w N wd xmz N O 1 0 l > Z J w W O w W ww J W I 1 O W N W w N w E 6' N 2 6' » N C •• I I FO I 1 M O 00� w I 1 M 000 �O O O O 0 000 O I I I I I pN 1 1 1 11 1 I I I 1 I 1 Z6 1 1 N OON V W 1 I N Il�Nlll M N N N V1 M M Na'•�f N d I I w I I N MMN In d M PAS N W I I �O 1lI M M N N �O OMV1 N I I I 11 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 N 0 0 0 0 M N N 0 0 0 z a I 1 0 000 O O O O N O OO0 1 OO I O 000 O O O O O r O OOA O 1 OZI M 0 o r- 1n 1 u I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I u I ON 1 a 1 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 a - I 1 u� I z I w 1 r 0r r wr r r wA r A 1 1 0 00000 Ooa O 0 d0 O 0 zO 0 000 O 1 owe O 000 O O OO O O WO O 000 O 1 \H 1 N NNN N N ON N N WN N NNN N I Y 6 1 \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ Z\ \ \\\ \ u I Up I M MMM M M um M M wM M MMM M Z 1 S 1 \ \\\ \ \ O \ \ \ z \ \ \\\ \ 1 U 1 M MMM M M ZM M WM M MMM 0 M I I O 000 O O w0 O O O 000 O Z 1 Y I 1 oD O I z I 0 000 O 0 ZO O O O O 000 zO w I m I H O 000 O O .0 O O 0 O O 000 00 H r Q 1 1 Q N d' z w u N -1 1 Z 0 Z d Y w F Z I 1 w w O Z f Q C W 2 1 •O 1 Z w Y O N f U1 01 02 I 0 N 6' 0 W 0 S W N LL I I w W J f d 2 CO w 1 d 1 K > £ Q z J ¢ 0 O J I I 0 S O O Q Q CC Z U Q I W z O 1 U A ¢PPP O M > M fflr Om O M M u 0 u 1£ W Z I 6 P d wow J N O W .O P w N N-- IO r I QS I wr wow oo Ja0 0 Q0 wo Dr .0 c0 a0 a0zo W O IZUU 1 Z Z O J O O O O O J O N O O u 0 S O 000 Z O W O Q I O 1 O 0 4000 O J O N O nO w O u 0 .0 o: N H I O 1 O Z O O O Jo u 0 W O 00 no K O W O 000 O O \JZ 1O w 0> 1 LL W O 2 K Q H I- d N M P w 1 O 1 w t] N N U Q O: N l.•J Q w r I Z 1 > J J C N J Q J Z Z £ Q H \Ma 1 W 1 6 Q Q Q W O O O O CC > Q Q M£ 1> 1 U U U u u u u u u U u C C O (JQI 1 J I A r O •• 1 W 1 00 W L d 1 O U I ON P No N O M P N 0 N 11 1n P N tr6O 1 Zw 1 m MP �1 � O NA �t Mr Vr O O m000 Apt •O Q0 I >z l N aO QNC m PO O w NO -O MIn ow, d0 N woY 1 O>Z I Oaf ONAN Ow OM OCO OYl N MO a- ooO� Opt N ww. 1 ZZ 1 O Oaf OONO OK ON Opt ON ON OHO aw OO>> 0 6' U 1 Ww 1 O O1 Orrr OQ ON O�0 ON ON OM OCO OM» OM J L( d6U I > 1 0 O1n O� O> 00 OU1 00 00 Or Or- OODU 0r M 1 I 1 O O O O O O O O O O ONnN . O O �t V Y 1 O O W- • APaO N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0N4N W P P u r I WZ I d .f vm M AM a0 0 a0 n n N N O O �t �t •-O N•O O O O M M 20I N N OM n 4M P O O d d O O UOI O P PAD N A A •O •O e- P P �t V £ I Q I M M � a-• A A d t M M I I a0 N N N 1 [C 1 W N I r ¢ r I W W M I R is ¢ is is U 'K io r io N {c J is •It v K M 3 Z O Q iG I r J W J JJ J J J W J d J J OO J J J I Z Q 6 Q QQ Q LL Q Q E 6 W Q r Q rr Q r Q Q I W r } r Mw r O r r } r O r E r EE r Z r r I £ O r O RK O O O 6 O O W O O S O O 1 } r I r ww r w r r d r z r S r urrw 1- 0 } rNNr d N Q6 d' W d0' dO' Q £Q6£ ZOM III OcZ QNrO 0 0 0 0 1-M 0 Od' 1- 0 XW 0 O O O O O O Q O w um p O c Wrn E Z Z N Z z 1- Z W z UQQU Z IM Z Z r 1 Z W Z W W Q Q W W W W J W W > W Z W W Z W U W I W Ld I > > OE > UUN > a: > O > m > U > p > Ote teO > \ > w > WMI c V MW 1 I 1 JIn LOJ 6 W rK 1 r OCICM J E 1 1 11 d M Mu 1 Q rM 1-1--11-1--1O 6 z z z 10mmm 4 J W I r Z O U U d O J J M£ S L S d WI N MW WWd S 6' LL MMMM 6 6 C 1 Q d' J J O V 6' w W W w W W W W W X W I 6'6'6'K W N 1 NN NNN N N O O O I O MN NNN O O O 0000 O O I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 N M M •O SON �0 N O O N N 1 v vd NNN M M O O N NNNN �} d 1 I N N N N N M M M M N N 1 N Ltd �t Ltd d A M M M dd�td N N 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 r I A NN V O O O NNNN N N Z I M 00 aa 000 0 0 O O 0 0000 N N I n 00 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 A n OZ 1 c- dd MAA N P N e V 1 1 81 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1111 1 1 I U I 1 1 11a1 Q 1 O 00 000 O O O O O 0000 O O I I I 1 I 1 I w I A n A A A A r A A n I 1 O 00 000 W O O 0 1 owl O O O O O O M O O O I \r I •N N N N N N ON N N 1 Y Q 1 u\ \\ \\\ \ \ \ I u c l Z M M M M M M J M M M 1 W I Mr Or I 2 I \ \\ \\\ O \ \ \ 1 U I =M M M M SM M M I I z 0 -00 000 u 0 O O Y 1 O z Y y I 2 I "a M O O J O O O O O •o I m 1 r0 SOO d000 []O O d0 A Q I u u d w W O Z I I K £ N U ap a[ I • 1 r M N al Oz I N N U Z J LL I 1 Z N Q Op M 1 d I O W 1- u J I I u 2 r N <IWWOI WMAA UMMO oM O oM V I =WW = I P P N WOO, Z N w n I QS I Wn ana0 a Qo0 WEW a0 O 41 ZU I WO L000 w0o o NO O O O 41 0 1 C O 00 000 0 0 O 0 w o N r I I O 1-00 1-000 1-0 O Z O \J Z 1 o> 1 N z tt o: 4 � 1 Z I > V1 N U I a I W I Q w w N N M w M O Mm 1> 1 O C 0 0 0 0 C O p O w Q 1 1 000 J 1 •• I W 1 MOM v w £LLIOU I N NA •OODa000 nP dM n 1 $M 1 BOA AM, NVVV ON PN nn <W I 0 0 1 amwQ O N N N M\ NA ma 1 G>Z 1 Na N, W N OODN OM�t�t OA MP MP woo- WOr 1 ZZ I 00 OMM O� Oo O0 00 C [CMIWM I OM OC£ 00 00 OM 6 d U 1 > 1 O O O Q U OoN WN W N ON a, 00 0000 0000 d N A •O AAA n M n M O M O O O O N O MN OA�t�n Mao O O O N N M N 0 0 am O N an O O 0 0 O o 0 0 o 0 00 v r 0 0 M \ O < 0 0 0 0 MOw Ow,,,OO w �Ow u, A O O O O 00 O O O d .Y N v, N v, O<NO<PNN w �ON P O O O O 00 O w M a0 a0 d d P P QoO w,rr w O MOM M M O O N N 00 O m M M h d b b rr<NM�om V OPm M P P O O Or n r A < < < 1 x x x x x x x x x x 1 J J J JJJJJJ J } f J J �O J J J J 1 4 Q Q QQQQQQ 4 u 4 Q 4 H Q a 6 1 H z Z Z z ...... < Q W 1 Z 1 O W 0 O W O 0 0 O d'zu O 0 0 O I O 0 W O 0 O 0 0 O wwwwwwwwwwww W W W W W W H m H H 1- F- A 1- L H 1- tO F I } } W fHFf HH Hx> O } F 1 to Q Q U Q4Qa64 d' H C C 4 £ Z 1 O d 0 d 0 H LSLSSS O 1 14u O LO O W 0 6 0 0 0 O 01 C p p O p W S 1 S p p S p .1 z Z Z >ZZZZZ00 Z u d' Z z 2 z 0 O z Z Z Y Z U Z 1-I W 0 O W 0 O W .00OOOO. W HWH W W W U W 0 O W U6 W Z W Sd I N > f > > HHHHHHHH > >U6 > d' > > H > WN > > > WH I W U u U Hf FHfff 1-• U SZ J I -we H O O F Q Q 4 Q 4 Q Q w1w I J 0 M U H 1 " U 1 J d' d' "Owa.. O1.... NHd' W W N 1 d C H H H H H H H Z > 1- L M W 1 d w N N 0 UHU Q O 0 N w Qp <= H p 1 2 Z www='wwww. d'd'Y. 6'6'd'Y. 6' \Q\ d' d' Z JJ W 1 N H H 1..IH HHHHHH 4L4 M d H 6m d' 1 1 P M M N N N N N N N N N O M 1 J d d v,M u,N NMrM w NM00 �1 N O O I 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 III I I 1 1 1 11 I I d M M •O �O �O •G BOO �O �O MMM < O M Md < MM v, I «P < I M N N MMMMMMMM NYl< Y, N N N MM M I d d d .fddd�td d.i dd�? V N d dV �? I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 f 1 M M M O O M MN Z 1 O O O 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 1 O O o 00000000 000 O O O O O O OZ 1 A M M ArAArAAA MMv, O O M u 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 4 1 O O o 00000000 000 O O O (DO O 1 w 1 r 1 0 1 0 1 p W l O I \f I N 1 Y 6 I Y\ I Up I ZM 1 w 1 a< 1 x 1 d\ I u 1 £M I I O O I Y I U I z 1 O I O] 1 zO r Q I I O N H I I H Z 1 I f W 0 1 • 0 1 U M O I O Z I � W H I d I H J I I N Q I W K O I U 1 L W Z I 00 A I ¢x I um 0 1ZU 1 O O 41 0 1 WO N H 10> . 1 \J Z 1-0 1 1 M P H I I Z < M O IZ I Q \M O 1 w 1 M£ 1> I 0 O al I J 1 I • • I W I w£ I O U 1 N K 6 0 0 1 2 H 1 Am Q[[ I 001 OM ao W OF- I ZZ 1 ON K CCH I WH I OHO d6U 1 > I Oc' r r r r r r r A r r r A A A r A A r O 0 00000000 0 0 0 a O O o 0 0 u 0 0 Oo 00o O o O o0 O z N N NNNNNN N NNNNNN N N N N N N N N N N H \ \ \\\\\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \\ \ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ' l0 m Mmmmmmmm mmm m m m mm m z M M = M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M H O O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 2 H W O O 00000000 000 O o O 00 O O O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O O O 00 O w O < a H E•J F Q N 9 x N U W 0 W ILA Z -1w Ee > > u w H £ a p W CC S W 2 > H N Q< ZN H00000000 WNM FN WO WN umEO F-d Z WN OOOOOOOO -PON NO H< I-Nww HPP < O MW 000 too OEOEOEOEOEOEOEO N0 zW U' O O u u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z O O O z000 a 'O N O wo O -00 H O O Z O .O 1,100000000 H O O 1-0 O .O u 0 0 O O a 0 } o f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 1-0 0 .0 Q O O .0 -+ W W W u C] 6 N £ Y 2 w J Q O Q Z £ U U' < 6 U N Z Q 0 H O 0 £ ¢ Q O U• N < N NI V V, r 0 Y OO A Y, AO wlr M PA wlA PO P« NI' MO EOM OOww 00 MO <O NN O ?1(E,1 OH a- O`ONwOV ONO OAON NM <r OH OPP yy'��(a{�M 16 1, am 00 OMV o--< ON41 ON 00 OK 0 i; 'b Oa O< OEo00E0w0P OPPP ON ON Oa OHH OM 0 O> am OP P P P P P P P O d d d 00 00 O> O M M 00 O N 1 1 0 I 1 w 1 I N Z I W I K.101 O 1 0 1£ I Q I o Q I d I H Z I I LL < 1 I W S 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O 000 O ON N 0000 O O O O O O O Mm IEOm O 1 Y 1 0 0 000 O On n 0000 O O O O O O O M V �O VrV b u 1 1 wZ l 0 0 000 O 00 O Ou1VO P 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mb P N N Vmn O 1 S01 O O ONuI O O O O O n�N m 0 0 0 O N N nm N N N NVO V 1 u01 r r OVN O O N N ONmn N N I c- c- N N N NNN N E I 1 > I I O Y I I 1-1 J J 2Z J J J J W J QL -1 O -1J u I I f 6 H1- 6 66 Q m m< H< < L< WO < S< < W I 1 Q 1- wN N 1- Z Z F• Z Z 1- U 1-1- Y H J U F d 1-1- S I 1 C O WQ< 0 wW O M dw 0 6 0 0 6 0 O O rrr O 1- u I 1 O 1-2 u U 1-1- 1- 1- F £ F F w 1- N 1- 6 1- m N 1- W 1- 000 H Z Z H W 6' W f 1- \\\ N 0 Q Q Q z M< 0 W 6VJ 0 Z 0 0 0 W 0 U¢ 0 0 000 0 J I 21 W p f00 O QQ O �-1 \�1 O O O c O> p u p O J O 000 O r I 01 6' C wO EE C J22J C U C C O C 06 W C C C JO I r11 2 d'ww 2 Z Z 2 6 Z 2 NN Z f 2 YYY 2 QO I F•I W W W WW w WQQW w Y W M W J W I I W< W LLLLLL W > rNN T 6d T 66'w > J > 2 > G] > NN > N > > O\ I wt11 < O/-1- QQ <mn< w N 1 WW ZZZ d'M I I-W I V 00 uu u u W m O M,-1 W £££ d� I M u I N S d d N N N££ N H W z J J J C C C d\ I N I O UNN C0 Cww. w w dd <<< Q M I W I Z K Z Z Z O O= Q E d Y. m O 1 01 < <T> QQ Q1-1-< w w » O 000 W I 1 J £ft- JJ JNInJ O E 6' NN L 66< K •• I I 1-LL 1 1-0 I I r V n O V r M M r N M O N V N 0 0 0 w I I O 000 �O OrrO O O O OHO N 000 ON I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I Z Q I I N N N N V V N M M N M M O �O M O O O W I I V NNN MM MVVM M N O NV V 6 I I X I I M N N M N V V V W I I N '00 I'll', N M M M N N N M M M I I N V n n V V V V V V V V M V V V N N N I I 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 I I 1 M N O O 1 1 I 1 1 1 I H 1 d M a N V V N M M V M O N O I z 1 N 0 0 0 00 0000 O O O 00 O O O O I .01 1,0 0 0 O O 0000 O O O 00 O O O O I O Z I P P r n M r n r M M V O O O I U 1 I 11 1 it lilt I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 u 1 0 O N O 1 Q 1 O 000 00 00 0000 O O O 00 O MMV 1 1 1 w 1 W 1 •r r r r N r r r r n n n n n N r n r r r r I 1 u 0 000 W O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 1 c w l Z O 000 V O N 0000 O O O 000 O O O O 1 \H 1 r1N NNN - NN NNNN Wry ry ry SNN N NNN 1 Y Q 1 \ \\\ >\\ \\\\ u\ \ \ W\\ \ \\\ 1 UO 1 0M MMM KMM MMMM d'M NM UM d'MM M MMM 1 W 1 mew Wit- WW- W<,, 1 2 1 Z\ m m m N m m U \\\\ E m �-1m N m 3 m m N\ \\\ I U I za M M M M M - 0 0 0 0 E M H M M M M W M M M M 1 I Z O 0 0 0 m 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 00 -10 .0 1-00 C O 0 0 0 1 Y I W z m u u w Z 1 z 1 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C O W O O H O 0 0 0 I m I = O N 0 0 0 600 0000 Q O 1-0 £ 0 0 Z O 000 r < 1 1 < Z < Z 0 W W N .1 1 N O u p 2 0! > > U 2 I 1 N M w K O Z 00 0 1 • O 1 N N < z u W O z L W 1r N O I .Z I Wm Q Z U m LL Z 6 H LL I I -la U < 0 £ J m m -1 d 1 <t- M J C Q J 2 J Q Z J I I N Z H 2 < W J 1-1 < I w 0 1 Z O 0 M M M Y M M N MMM M u 0 V O o M W O O w 0 0000 OOO H 0 u 1£w Z I OM £ N N N u N N Z NNN N O m N £ m w < W z W W W J 1<S 1 mm 0=WWW000 woo owwwww0000 1-0 i,m00 QN pNN <m <mmm 0 O <1 z u I O O O O O woo 0 u 0 0 0 0 F O O O 00 S O O N O z 0 0 0 N O I C d m > > -1 J V I I 2 W Y m 0 1•J Z w 'MM 0 1Z I 6 z z < O 3 m z O W< 1 1 N J I 1P 0•• I w I NN r W£LLIOU I N P Me•N NM M N V M r NN M O KQOIZ0 1 mN r MNN SON N � Nr rr MVP VN N /�7' <N 1 001 MV OmMm NVV me- e- MP MO MO OOM NO Na ;00 0JI dNY 1 0>Z 1 MP OMPP NMM Oitr-i QV MV Mm ONN 00 OPP V O iw W O H 1 Z Z 1 a w O O P P 0 0 0 Q= a a= 0 0 O N 0 0 0 �O 00 0 as a 0 I Om ONIAn 000 OEOOL 0- ON OM O� m 00 0000 O d d u 1> 1 a- O N N N O O O O Ja-� J 0- O O O O O P P O � O V V V O m I I 1 c I I w I I N Z I 1 N 0 I W 1 d p I U• 10 1 I £ I < O Q I 6 1 f- Z I ILL< I 1 W S I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O P P O O 00 O O O ED m W N M O 00 O 1 Y I O N O N O N O O O O O N N O N O O N N m m m m 0 0 O O O 7 M 99 0 r 9 n N u1 I 1 WZ I NrOrONNNNNOrNOrOON N m m 00 O .t .t NODNOO aD ON N 1 SO I rNNmmOD P r-V �-•mNdmPNNM P N N 00 OD rO0 N N N OO �r-Nm N nP m 1 UO I Y��-•Qm d�Y �f�M��t GO P �tm Plnm d M M N N V� •O � �� v1 Nit n r- 1 I � 1 I 1 I r 1 0 1 O 1 I N 1 I \ I c 1 I 1 I \ 1 I M 1 I O 1 I I I I I W I I f I 1 W a 1 1 u N I 1 W M CC W I 1 0 H z 0 O F W 0 0 zW < 0 S I I O S N O O w N 1 u > £ <LL M I 1 0 W C K 0 1 WO 0 S W 0 J I o 1 O N O u O O J O O W O h I O 1 C N I S 6 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > N > 1 > f f > Z > > J > O\ 1 W N I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ID W W O K M 1 1- I u U u w w U U U U U U U U U U U U U rl Z o G V N J d r 1 u M 1 >>M ........... J N N N N N N d\ 1 .1 > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > 6 D) 00 H Z Z Z Z V d QM 1 W I N QQ6QW £d WWWWWWWwww w WWwwwww O 0 0 W J J J J 6 < 6' W 1 I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N J << 6 6 6 6 6 N U N � •• 1 1 1- O 1 1 O r K r r O O r O r r r r r r O r 0 M M M ro r r r r r N 1 1 -OOOO,,O,OOOOOOc-O, M O .t .Y 00000 No p N I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I, I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M O N N N N N m .t W 1 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N d d d M M M M M N M X I I Mrs-�-c•a-�� W I I mMM MInNNNNNN NIl1 V1NY1 V1N N N InNNNN NM I 1 ��}�}�}NNIn NIn InNNVI Y1N Yl V1N �f �} NU1 �t NNNNN dd I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 11 1 1 1 I I I f 1 r-MmPOMdEONMVNN�tm EDP M 00 N NNNNN 00 I Z I OOOONd�t �t �tNNNNmmmmm O O 00 O ONNNN 00 I 0 0 1 O O O O n n h h n h h h h h h h h r O O 00 O r n n n n 00 I OZ 1 mrnnr-r-..r-...r-.... M N 00 M Mh I V I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 6 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 1 I w 1 w I r r r n r r n h r h h h h h h h n h N h r h h h n r r r r r r 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O 0 0 0 00000 00 I C w l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jo O O O O 00000 O O 1 \H I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a" N N N N N N N N N N N 1 Y Q 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Z\ \ \\ \ \\\\\ \\ 1 u p l M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M S M M M M M M M M M M M M I w 1 u� 1 S 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ W\ \ \\ \ \\\\\ \\ I u 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M H M M M M M M M M M M M M I I 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O O O O O O Y I H I Z 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 0 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 00 I m 1 000000000000000000 W O F O 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 00 r 4 1 £ H N N I -I I 1 U Z O w Z I 1 Z N N u > aD c 1 •0 1 w 4 w > U w Z N 01 O Z I 1- tr > Q LL I I I:J EC Q � S K 6 < N O QIWCOI Hrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ZM NM wEDM N rcWWWWa0 00 u U 1 £WZ I JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WN zN aDPN 'O I:JPPPPP wa-e- r 1 6x 1 Sao a0 a00p W00 aD 00 maD ao aD ODmNNapN m Qap �raD uw Onnnrr Yww 0 O '1 Z U 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jo W O w o o Z O m 0 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 O Q 1 = 1 Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O < 0 Jo 00 "a d O O O O o J 0 0 Y N t I w o 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z O c 0 '00 O w 0 0 0 0 0 00 u \JZIO> I U O O O r-MO I Z I H 3 W J m W H \M O 1 W I < < W O U S 6 M£ 1> I Z Z 2 z Z O O 6 O tEQ 1 I J 1 0 •• 1 W I m M W £LLIOU I O MM N N 00 Vr-N r-N OD d P OCQO I Z0 1 N PO rr 000 mm OmawN amn m <� 1 0 Z I N m m ma 0 0 0 a m N m N O O M M M dog 1 p>Z I O ON MED QNO OM NP"N NOO M WOh 1 ZZ 1 O ON 00 ONO OED OdN� c zl+I W" 1 0000000000000000000 00 OM ONM Om Ommmmm 1(lY I� ddu 1 > 1 o--.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-�-a-.-... on oO 000 om opt �t �tv� `:� io'_ is n 1 1 1 p 1 1 w 1 1 yz o1 1 I N M I W M O I O I 0 I S I 4 6 I HZ I WQ I I w x I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Y 1 1 u 1 1 Wz 1 x 0 1 1 .01 I £ 1 I al I I I I I n I I O I O I I N I I \ I I M I I I \ I I M 1 I O 1 1 1 1 1 1 W 1 1 H 1 1 Q 1 1 O I 1 I I Y I I u I I W I I x 1 I Hu I I N I I I I J 1 Z I A 1 a[ J O 1 M I <o I HI > N I £ a 1 O\ I W.1 wM I ` 1 u 1 6 \ I N I Q M 1 W I O 1 O I W 1 I CC •• 1 1 H O 1 I M 1 1 pN 1 1 Z Q 1 1 W I 1 6 I I X I I W I I 1 W I 1 � 1 1 p W 1 1 \H 1 1 Y Q 1 u p I 1 W I I 2 I I U I I I Y I 1 Z I 1 m 1 r al 1 N M 1 1 Z I I 00 01 •O 1 N O I OXI LL I I ap M I a I J I I Q I wwo 1 u 1£wz I n I Q x I O .1 zu 1 O < 1 O 1 N H I z 0 I \J 2 I O > I M P M I I — M= I Z I \M O I W I M £ 1 > I o mZ 1 wol- O1 2 2 1 1'C. 1 WM 1 6 6 U 1> 1 O O N N r A A�Otd oo Mtn a- N P P O O 000 O P P 00 O N N .t d n n M M na0 .OMNVONN n •O •O 0 0 000 O M M oo O n r P P O O rW0MtA A N N 000 O ON N a0 a0 N N a0 M a0 M m� o �t aONMNM M�00 O M M M M P P CON N N N N N M M O O a0 0 N O N n N m M N r r r r N OP, O r- N N 'NM n N N < y N N NNN N H J p p p O O O 1c is it < z K ee C ae K {t it it is K k it W U Q 6< Q Q 6 N J J J WU UUUUU J N J l.J J J J J J Z Q N < Q p w N O O " W O O W W W W W O 6 O y O >>> O O O U O ti W O O W W W W W f U H H >>> F- H !- > H J U J Z J J Z Z Z Z Z f .0m N 1- O Q O> O NN»yNNyy O O O W O zzz O O O J O W p 6' p w O > »»> p O p > p ZZ2 p p p 4 p 1 Z= Z W z IOMWWmGMMM Z 0 Z p Z £££ Z z YY Z Z 2 I W H W 0 W 11 1 1 1 I I I I W I W Q W W O 'U W W U u W O W N > U > > WNNNNNNNN > N > > £££ > N > WW > > W W W z W W W W W W W W W } W x S N 1-• O MMMMMMMMM M < www M UU N J x fJJJJJJJJ J J wJ W 6 T Y Z 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mw 6 N 6 Z 2 6 U U M 1 1 LL 6 6 6 6 6 6 N z Z N z 6 Q Q 0 LC < rcoo > 000 JJ to N < m 6NNNyyyNN N p UU{J N M16 6 r 0 O O d 00, -OONMO O 000 O MM I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 11 1 �O N M MM�O �OMM�-�O'O O N NNN 41 MM N N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N O a- NNasddN NNr N NN O N O O O O O O O N N O O O O N M O 00 O O n O 00000 O 000 O O 1,n A O 00 O I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I O O O 00 000 0 000 O O 000 O 00 O r A A A r A A A A A r r A A A n a r A r A O o O 000000000 o O aaa 0 00 O 000 O o 0 000000000 0 0 000 O oo O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\ \ \ \\\ \ \\ \ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\ \ \ \\\ \ \\ \ W M •M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M U O U O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 000 0 O O O w M M > O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O £ O 00 O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 M O 00 O W W U 1- 1- x M O 2 2 U f O Z M z < W Z O O w 6 H W O y £ -1 z £ M U p J 6 O S LL Q ¢ F ¢ w M M Uo UM Ol0 Ma NOOMMMMM M UP UMN" ON ZOO -1, � w N d P N O O N N N N N N N U P O N N N LL O O N J W O as a0 a0 <0 00 a0 a0 a0 a0 a0 Ya0 =a smmm a0 u00 00 w O o Q O 0000000000 0 0 as 0 H O O D =a M o o y 0 Y O z 0 -Jo z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O y 0 0 0 Z O w w z woo Z O U O 00 O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1- 0 U O Z O O O .0 w O O am w w M M M O F- \ U LC wO: Z < Q 0 M M m M N LL h W M IL J 6 W 6 IL M M 6 6 6 6 6 w O d' d' w r M N O P �D 00 MIX) '000 0 0 V r M N M4 n P OM4MNa —A ,� Or N w 1 1 1 nA N N V1 h Il L mm MM Nm OWNNNNMNMr 00 M aONOr NO N M yy N 1111 11 MO Mr NM QMOOONMNMP 00 am 0O�Nl000 No � OHO 0 O N O N am O M O O O O O O O M 01 O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 o mf 0, O ON ON 00 0000000000 Or a— 0�0 SON OM OPP 00 0 ON a- 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O r- 0000 O O O M M or O N I I I I 1 I p 1 00 0 I W 1 00 O I O 1 NMZ I Pd M - 0 1 P d t W 1 0: r1I < W 101£1 a 1 pa1 6 1 fZ I ILL6 I Iw2 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 O O O O N N O O O O O O r A A A 0000000 O O O O I Y I O O O O r r O O O O O O M M A r 000000 o O n00 O O O -H1 . NN I WZI NNNONNN O rr O O N 1 x0IO •O M M a0 aO P P O O N M M M N N MAOP<•O< O 1 u 0 I 1 £I 1 Q I M M P P M M < < M I I #R 1 I I I YY A 1 I uu O I I WW O I I N I I uu \ I I c 1 I 1 I \ I I M I I O I I I I I I H 1 I >t H YYYYYYY 6 1 I H z uu-uuuu WW p I I K % Z it {c it 4 iC H it it it El 2 2 K it I I W W H Z ZZ2Z222 �-1 �-1 Y I I d J E J J J J J W J J J QQQQQ6Q J ZZ J J U I I W Q Y Q Q Q �J 6 E Q Q Q JJJJJJJ Q 00 6 1- Q W I I W Q y Y 666d666 H Z f xU II II 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 O yy 0 W 0 w X O 0000000 N I 1 I W U w W 6 22222ZZ VU Y I 1 N 0 > 0 0 H d' 0 W 0 d' 0 0 00 0 6 0 J I z 1 J O O O m O �-1 O W O > O J O p O ppppppp O 1 1 O 6 0 A I of J p p W p E p LL p O p W p Z p aaaaaaa p 11 p p W Z W 0 Z Q O I f I U W (G W Y. W W W J W J W Q W 1 W W U• W W W W W W W > N I E d 1 > > > L > p > l> w> N > > w W w W > H > 1 O\ I WMI W I W J I F W WWWWWWW pp U d'M I fd' 1 U Z x p 1 NNNNNNN z 2 00 O: d\ I NI > > Y J O E 6 ---u--- 4 M 1 W 1 w w w O Q LL 6 W W W W W W W wp1 o w (O N O I no W W O W d' W W 2 W 1 1 N 6' m 2 N 6' 6' y 6666666 W W M K •• 1 1 �LL I I F-O 1 I b O W P O N eD EO NED a0 aO aD M N N O O O N NNNNNNN 000 V p V1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I ZQ 1 1 M O MMMMMMM NN M MMMMMMM NN M X I 1 M f �t d �t dot �t MN W 1 1 N N N N N M NNNNNNN <O N �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 �t 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 H 1 O O .t N O 0 :t V NNNNNNN Mo M 1 2 1 O O N O O O O 0 0000000 00 O 1 oO 1 O O O O O O O O 0000000 00 O 1 OZ1 O < Vl M O A NNNNNNN <P M 1 U 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 I I I I I 1 I u 1 < <N 1 6 1 O O O O O O O O 0000000 00 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w I r A N r r r N A OOOOOON r0 r 1 1 0 o O O o 0 0 O uOOOOQQO 00 0 1 pWl O O O O O O O O 2NNNNNNN 00 O 1 V<1 N N N N N N N N-INNNNNNN NN N 1 YQ1 \ -\ H\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\m\\ \ 1 Upl M ZM 6M M M M M M MMMMMMm mMM M 1 W 1 w< N«««< J« 1 x 1 W\ ~\ p\ \ \ \ \ \ W\\\\\\\ V\\ \ 1 U 1 UM fM M M M M M -MMMMMMM NN M I 1 Yo NO O •O O O O-10000000 LLOO O > 1 Y 1 > - p > J I Z I .O WO LLO O •O O O 0 OOOOOOO 000 O I m i WO FO .O O SO O O O WOOOOOOO WOO O r Q 1 1 N M d' N -1 1 x w O z z l 1 z u x W Q W w Ep a t • O I 2 ¢ W 0 Y 1-1 Z 6 Z N I O Z I W Q z M O x LL I 1 £ > O: W 1- N J I 1 M d Z O W J W p <IWWOI zwz l MN QO UM -ED EEO JM WN ZMMMMMMM Vet 'DW N U 1 EWZ I 00 UO N N QP dN zO -O ow ww -NNNNNNN O NN -�N r IQx 1 W0 no WN WA d'A 0 SN 2W =00000EON OAr N O <1 ZV 1 O 00 pO 00 O -0 00 WO ZOOOOOOO rcOO MO O Q1 o 1 p0 ZO .0 .0 YO -O �a0 LL0 W000000O 00 ZO w N Z�Iwolo> 1 WO 60 M M 00 00 O O 0000000 w 00 W \JZIO> I K J w w O: Z N Z W z J , M= I p 1 M W W Q N O > 2 d <M O I Z 1 H Q > > N w 0 Q X Q 1 W 1 J 6 W W `+ED O O Q mm 1> 1 M H w d' d' N d' 6' 6' 6' N N N N OW61 1 b J1 1 b w•• 1 W 1 O A N w<01OV 1 N M NO N 00 N O m < O 01 EO QO120 1 N dA <O P V 1 NN No M < A EOM ((t�n� 1}., Qd' 1 001 N WO Oa PM MN MO r0 O <EOA�O N�iMN PAN mm k-M�,a.0 .0Y l p>21 O O< OO NO a t MN ON NN O�O�O�O� NNN INN MM ��a WOHIZZ 1 OHO 00 OO OW 01 00 Oa- OM 00000000 000 O< O O=O .J W.+ 1 ON OM Ox ON O< OM O< OA 00000000 0rA ON O 6 dUl> I O< 00 ON O�i 00 00 Or OP oNNNNNNN ONN OM O 0 W O d i I I I I 1 I d V N�pOOOOPM�n�Odn In P P In In N N M M O O O O OAInNO Y I P P mAmOm NOD POND PIn m N N P P M M r n O O O O Pr-P�P U F I WZ I m m mO OAm dm m M M N N n n N N In In P P c-N OHO SO I V •O PInOwo.OwVmMln •O O In vl .t �t m m O O O O N N PN ADO .O U O I M M � � a- � � r- N N •O •O �- M M �- a- N N � � £ I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I it k if is # M u 1t % I Z J I J J J J J J 6 J Q J I 6 a a 6 < Q U Q 3 Q I O 0 0 O 0 O Y O Z 0 I Z W W W tO Z K H Z 1 O M 0 w N 0 0 O < O 00 z 0 O 01 z O O p 6 p •D p p d• O p 6 N 1 M z > > Z W Z �1' Z Z u x W x M Z \N F• 1 m W 2 Z W 1 W i! W W W £ W £ d 1 > M N N N N N N M N N N N N > N > Y > > > W > M > O W 1 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W I- u I M < w 1 Z fM...N rl K Uu .0 r•II 1-IJJJJJJtiJJJJJ J f K Z U r+WNN N I } pdLd666pd6666 6 Z J 1-• N 6'JZZH W 1 6 W 6 6 6 6 6 6 W d 6 6 6 6 6 W 0 m ..o w <W I I U U N N N N N N U N N N N N N £ LL U 1 M O O MHO �O .OM I O OOOOOOOOOOOON M M O a .iddd�t I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 I 'O `O.O �O �O �O �O �O �OV•O .O O �O M M M O M �O `O �O NOD I N NNIl. 1l. Y1 Yl V11(. V111� Y1 �} v d N VINNNN I 1 <- .NY1 r-NNNYI N N 1 N NMMMMN a'-�O `OMM MMe- In K MMMMM 1 v Vet V �t �t .t �t �t �f dot dln d N In �t M d 44444 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 F- 1 O MMMMM Z 1 O aoaaooaoaoaao O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00000 OZI �I �I In .O .O M O O d I+1 N A r r IA I1 U I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I U I m N 0 < I O a O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 1 W 1 1 � 1 1 O W 1 I \H 1 I Y Q 1 I U p 1 I W I I £ I I u I 1 I I Y I 1 Z I 1 m I r al 1 N •+ I I Z I 1 m 1 • O 1 0 Ili I O Z 1 • LL I 1 JI 1 <IWWOI U I=W=I I r I < x I 0 .1 ZU I O < 1 o I N H 1< O 1 \J Z 1 O > 1 MPI p MM I Z 1 \M O 1 W 1 M £ I > 1 O O Q I 1 J I I • • 1 W I w£LLI OU I 0:601 Z1 0 6¢ 1 O I W O H I Z Z 1 K C M 1 W M I 6 d U I> I r nnnrnnnnnnnnA n n n n r n nnnnn O 0000000000000 O O O O O O 00000 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 00000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ MMMMM M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W ............. \ U• \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ MMMMM M ¢ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O F-O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y O S O O O O O 00000 Z Z 6 Y O < O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < O u 0 u 0 O O O u 0 0 0 0 0 O > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O:O O Z O .0 O O Z O O O O O p a W > Q N N O M N W N U f 6 p W 0 O M W < Z Y S N w u / O Z d H m NOr-mmmmVVV1 NM Jr JN ¢In Om ZO Nm w P OOr-PPPP��OONNr- wO no 0 uP « WP =000OO W A m 0 > m < m <W w H m A am 3 n O <W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ooOOOOOOOOOOO Oo 0 0 <O 'o O W O 0 0 0 mO000O N O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z O N O .0 J O O Z O 00,000 W O w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O -0 Z O 0 0 O 00 Z 0 0 0 0 0 J J Z W U J N d 6 Z J W W £ N Q Q w O Z N N N N N I-• H F L- r-NII�N A•OmVMNP�� •O .O �O �O •O O M NCO �D Nln •O D �Pmnmm`OVPPNNP In m mr-PII�P •D �O N`ONNP�iP M V n InM A M �tmNONMMOmNNNPN 0 O V1 In b MO NO VQI W NV OPNmVI"WW,NNN ON OM MI OW0NCO Om0� r Nr- Opt OY1N r-r-��COm �r-NNN OnmmmmC Omm Ql ON Od ON ON Om Od Of OV OY Md ON V), OM am OMB WK 7 OwwwwP 1• 1 "C OP OOOO 00000000000000 Oa- oN OHO OM Om Ommmmm O �f O M M M M M M M M M M M M M O �t am O M on O d ON am OP P P P P I I vIP m M M O O O O Oln In m•O d O O O O O O O �O f M M O O O O o— N— O O O O O O mwA m m In O P In On A A O O O.O �O m N M O O O 0 O O N �Wm N •D In m O m m P P O O O In In P •O �O O O O o In In O M O M N O M P O O .1 •O O N� O O N N M A •O �O In A O •O �O � � � N N N N N W I I V �HN 6 1 I Z C iG 6'CC G 1 I it {t r dt W i[ N {t {t F• {C * ♦< W W W # I I m Z L O Y 1 I J Z J W J } J 6 W J J W J J J V W d W W W J U 1 I Q W Q L 6 6 Q W W Q 6 LL Q Q 4 S W iG 6 W W Q W 1 1 } r Y r d r G LL W 3 W 3 3 r 2 1 1 O u O Q O z 0 0 w 0 N 0 1- 0 0 d'N6'WNN O N O dd'dNWW M 1 I w LL 6' W 6' O d' M M 6' L d• m d• W W W I U U 6• J 1 Z 0 6 0 0 > O O JJ O O I 1 O W 0 0 O r 0 O o 01 A I O I �-1 O C O O C W C � Ca W O O 3 C Q =<=J O 3Q3J00 JO I M I Z f Z Z W u Z UU Z UN = Z Z Z Z z £ 60 I 1 rW w W W J W LL W QQ W fl d' W W f W O 0 I 10» W 1 1 w I W 1 M 3N I Ld 1 NW > > m > > > M > d > Z > r u' . > WOww > N O\ 1 Ww 1 OS u U 1 Y 1 1 JQ Q £ N DOWN W CM 1 rC 1 6N Q G U GO Jd U Y W }JI-I rr M 6� 1 ^'IU 1 \ 6' Z Z2 QW N d 6' r\JrMM J d\ 1 N 1 r Z 7 J } K C S 6 QM 1 W I mN o w Z Q N Z 2 r W w w d•"==wW d O 1 CI �-10 O W J ww wW ZC Q r K SM'J£KQ W 1 1 Nd U 6' 6 6'd' r�N J �f 6 rSNHUU N C •• 1 1 3 1 1 rO 1 1 MHO O O O 00 mm N N M I I O O 00 ow II II I1 �1 �1 �1 .1 I1 CN 1 1 I I I I 1 It it I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ZQ 1 N O 00 MM •O M M MMMMMM •O 6 I I x 1 I V CON PP N W 1 I MM M N d Nd N N ��e-c•�� M 1 I dd d M M NM dot d N v NYINNInN d 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 r 1 M M N O 0 00 m m In O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 OO O O O 00 00 O O 0 OOOOO 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 O O O O O 00 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 OZ 1 AA A A OM In In M O O 000000 A 1 U 1 I I I I I it 11 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I N O 1 a I o0 0 0 0 00 00 0 o A OQa o00000 0 I I c- I I I I I w 1 AA A A A AA AA A A A AAAAAA A 1 1 00 O O O 00 00 O 0 0 OOOOOO O I G W 1 00 O O O 00 00 O •0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I \r 1 N N N N N N N NM N UN N N N N N N N N I Y Q I \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ Z\ \ \\\\\\ \ 1 u c l M M M M M M M M M M `+M M M M M M M M am u.- 1 S I \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ r\\\\\\ \ 1 U 1 M M M M M M M M = M M m Z M M M M M M Y M 1 I 0 0 O O O O 00 00 O WO O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 J O I Y I u o £ a I Z I Z O O u 0 Z O O 00 00 O .0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 I m I ZOO ZO I+O O 00 00 O >O 0-1000000 =O n a l I .+ .+ a o � N N M I I N r CC O Z I 1 N N 2 Z w d W N m C I • O 1 W In at O z l O w S N 6 r W CE Y LL I 1 a w o r Z w 6 u m 1 a 1 u z o as Z x z o J I I S a G 0 m o CC u w C Q I Wd'O 1 d'OO =mm Lmm Nm Wy HO uILWZI - Z N 0000000 zNO A IQS I <WW ww .0 am A A J A A Q A Z m m 6 m m m m m m W m O <1 Zu 1 mO0 O WO O o dO0 O "O WO 000000 rO O Q I 0 I 00 X0 3 0 } O woo 00 WO O WO Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O N r l m 0 1 Z O O w O O 00 J O O Y 0 0 00 MO Z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 \JZ I O> I - LL N O m W Q O O w W M P•'I I c 1 N LL Z J L J r 6 r r O 1 W I O C K CC G' Q O W S mm1> I r r r r r > > > > 3 3 O U Q 1 I J I I c • • I w I W£1 OU I A m N P A N P m O f,1 0_ mM ��t ,ry{ap QW1 001 00d O VO MO MNN MOON Vw r m MO M�DOs-� :,10.. •, ' dM} I c>Z 1 a�w O OHO Mm Mln OPd Nd MN MN Nd�l .0r I ZZ 1 OPT O 00 00 a-- OA•O 01 ON 00 OMMMMMM OHO W." I W. 1 O m m a- am am O M M O A A a" ON am O A A A A A A am d d u 1> 1 OP P O, 0 0 an O N N O, a. O, 00 O x X x x x x ON 1 1 I I I InZ l M MM lO 1 0 1 £ I a I pal w 6 IFZ 1 � 1 w 2 1 1 1 ry 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 O In In O O O O O O d I Y I A A O O O O I u H I I W Z I In a0 ap O O O O N N •O I Vol O A h O O O I £ I I I � 1 I I I � A I I N O 1 I O 1 I N I I \ 1 cI I 1 I \ 1 I M 1 I O 1 I 1 1 1 I W 1 1 {I f 1 1 H 6 I 1 Z do i[ I 1 £ ♦t Y I 1 J J J Y J JJ Nit U I 1 Q < Q 4 Q QQ W{p W I 1 0 0 0 w 0 00 M* 2 I 1 O O O w O 00 1-* H U I 1 H H O H W H N 1-1- H {{ NI I > U wK J 1 Z 1 O O O O en OW A 1 01 WW* �It 1* QO I F•1 W U W Z W LL W U Ww >N I £d I > W > U' p > W >N W* W{[ O\ I W 1 2 J Y 2 it OCM I fm 1 U I U U p J{( L a-• I N U 1 O] 2 <•k a\ I .1 Z £ Z Z Q FK QM I W I < H < Q S O•K � •• I 1 J �LL I I 6 F- I I M O O N O CN I 1 I I I I f 2 6 I 1 M M W p 6 I I Z X I I J v 4 W 1 1 v d M �i U• 1 1 1 1 I 1 ! N N O N 1 Z 1 O O O O 1 0 0 1 O O O O 1 0 2 1 I U I I I I I I U 1 1 6 I O O O O 1 1 1 1 I W I A A A A 1 1 NO O O O 1 n.1 W O O O O 1 1 YQ 1 u\ \ \ \ 1 Vol O Z M M M M 1 2 1 lO\ \ u\ \ 1 U 1 Y 6M M JM M 1 1 J O O JO O 1 Y I L u I z 1 LL �-10 o uO uo 1 O] 1 JO O OO >O A Q 1 I N Ip N N N I 1 Z I OD < G O OO 1 •O 1 0Z In 01 O z Y U• I w w LL I U Z U C 00 M I 1 I O M p W J I 1 w > i- W , N W Q I WwI V 1'2[O u 1£ W z 2 I ww P A I QS I W towo ZOO U•A l0 O <1 Zu I 1-0w 0 00 ZO O 4 1 I Q z 0 wO Y O WO N 1- 12'O I QO ZO O w w \J 2 I O> 1 p Q MP�+Ip 1 1, -1z £ U M I Z 1 J £ 0 O 1 W I 2 J O Mm 1> I 3 3 3 3 Y 0 0 < 1 1 J I I p•• I W I N W E LL I O U I P O MO YEA A QO 1 ZwMO 1 NO <. 10 NO P MP MO O ONM N woo"I p>Z I I'll 00 MOO ON w O h I Z Z 1 O ON 0 0 00 01 CC U l WM 1 O 00 OM OM OA naul> 1 0 oO oO oO oO 1 W W 1 P P W N N r O N 20 I N N N r N K r r P V W I m 2 P M I I A � I A I N I I I I I W Z I Z M I JQ 1 x x x x x x x x x O W I MWI Q rc I Wm N N o n O O O 00 P P r m N 00 BOO N P N P A O N M M A PLO O d O d P d r Wt l OO AA o0 . . . OO •1d PNN OO rr NMNO�O�Nm��NANNNMPmrN . . .01 MINI r P A 0 0 N N NN N m N N O N m M N M N M N m O d r m ZMI NN NN .td MMA AA PP ODNONNmON�rPmOPO��O�Om 60 I mm '�-o,a- dd dNP MM m N� mrdOmM�A�d� W 1 WLL 1 L 1 N N WWI WWI Z I v 1 1 1 1 1 O N d N V MM O PPPr�f �c-�}a-M�NVOOm�N.trP 1 O N O 00 O M O 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P O NN N M N M,0000000 , 1 m MM 1 �. M. . . . .K�f . Z I O 0 1 N Ltd d N dd d d d.t �f .T i .t .t �t .tdddd�tdddd.f mid 01 I 1 I 1 I 11 I I 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 u 1 O N O 00 N O Nit 0t 0000J' 0N000�INNNN000000 .1 O OD 0 0 O O 00 O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q I O O A O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O A A M O M M I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I O O O no O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oo0 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A A r r r r r A r r A n A A A A A A A A A A r r r r r A A r r r 1 O O O 00 O O no O O O O O o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O O O 00 O O no O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W I P P P n P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P a 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 000000000000000000000 O I \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M I O O O 00 O O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 •z 6 1 P P P •O P m P N NCO �Orrr I O O O 00 O 0, O 000000000000000 .....e- 1 M m 0 m 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m I O O O 00 O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 C O O 00 O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I 6 O O 00 O O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I � a I 6 W c U W 1 Z N N 1 W EC C O 1 V O Q W Z 1 x 3 G 2 L O I £ N ¢ W 4 1 I W W W W U 2 O U Q I W J J J W N Q 1:J I 1 W J J W I N I 1:J K 4 Q N W W K I 0 I O 3 J J Z 6' Z N I J 6 Q LL 4 �-I rl K J J d LL J I N Q J J N Z £ Y Q 1 K J w W 4 Q O S 4 4•I I J Z Q Q 0 W N Q J d 1 a o 0 0 � a w o £ I I I M r M m m O O P N �f m 1 I I P P P P P P O O O O I N N N N N N M M M M t- I N N N N N N N N N N I r r A r A r A A A r N P O M o 0 M M O N O O M W O P O W z W I r Z 1 Z W I Z I -I I 1- 1 0 Q 1 �I iI iI if it iI iI 'If it iI r IOrI Z 1£WI O 1 QW I in NN Y 00 00 M�t .t 00 1 Ow 00 MNCO<N««W<d< O 1 \1 NNN 00 00 MPm PP 00 NNN, PP 00 MIX) .N<WN V IWU1 ..... u 1 xv 1 dor-ONN< NN 00 �1WM 00 00 NNmo loin NN 4�t MPInPPP Pin PInA Q 1 Z�I I dOANNPO 00 W�tM MM 00 N�iNO NN « �f 4 MPMNMMMMP MInN QpI <PO<MNN COW NN .P NN 00 < NA N < N< r I £ I W WWI ZI I dA<.tA O N IA'A N I NNN N O O NNNNMVPPPWNN I 000000 O N NN N M <OIn N O O NNNN<O«N<NN I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 31 1 1 oil I I I IIIIIIIIIIII I O < < NN N N MO«MO« I r 1 ««« P < In In M N P P In lnnr«««In< Z I NMMMMM O N N NNM O O <MOnMMMM<N o I N �1 �t �f �t ddd �t N N dd�t Ltd Ltd dot �f dui OI I IIIIII 1 1 1 11 1 1 111 I I I 111111111111 .1 V00000 O O NN O N � N O O O O O 00 O O 00Olww O O O OOOOOOOOOOON 00000 ooY ooI <1 ¢1 000000 a0000 O O 00 O O 000 000 O O O OOOOgOOOOOOO 1 YIA AAAA O O �t �t O .i v1OA �t O O V�1 �tVMMAAMM�t In 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 «< < W W <W< «< < ««< 1 000000 O 00 O O<O 0 0 0 000000000000 W 11 AAAAAA A A AA A A AAA A A A W 11 000000 0 0 00 O O 000 0 0 0 000000000000 000000000000 11 000000 O O 00 O O 000 0 0 0 000000000000 Y I I NNNNNN N N NN N N "NN N N N NNNNNNNNNNNN W Ir 1 P P PP P P PPP P P P x IQ 1 000000 000000 O O 00 O O 000 0 0 0 000000000000 000000000000 u 10 I \\\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\ 1 1 M M MM M M MMM M M M W 1 1 000000 000000 O O 00 O O 000 0 0 0 000000000000 000000000000 J 1 1 W I I 6 1 1 1001 6 1 •Z I < 6 16 I 1 I w 1 1 r 1 1 Z IW 1 AAAAAA P N PP N N N P P NNNNNNNNNNNN Ow 1 O O 00 O O 000 O O O O IxO1 wwwwwo M W WW W W WWW W M M WWWWWWWWWWWW U IUZI 000000 000000 O O 00 O O 000 0 0 0 0OOOOOOOOOOO u 10 1 000000 W O 00 O O 000 O W W 0OOOOOOOOOOO Q 10 1 000000 6 0 00 O O 000 O d a 000000000000 1> 1 I 1 Z 1 1 r o I 1 N N I 1 FI r I I c Q I I z u I I Z O Z N I 1 O I 1 r I -I 0 I I r ¢ r £ I I a u a r £ I I N V Z O I I z o u a I I m o z o W I o£ I O £ Q r W LL In OYIZ6I J u O 1- 0 J0] 1 I W Q W W r W Y 2 6 < 6 I I W Z r r N W W M U V W Vol I 6 X X W Vl Q W N N J W 1 1 £ N W W 3 W 6 1 ¢ Q W 0 Q¢I I O I NJZ I 1 P O d O N W O P N M O \NwN I W 1 N M. In d N N WdaJ1O I N W P M< N O OMOJICOI < N M M M M \£ WIZ21 M O¢ 1 W I O J I > I o.. 1 W£LLO I 1 M N N A W P O N M W¢001 I O 0 O O O O O �� t ¢ W IV I M M M M M M M M M M M -Y 1 U 1 N N N N N N N N N N N worZIWO1 A A A A A A A A A A A WW¢IxZ1 16VWIU 1 M P P I 1 OHO 1 I M N O M .t N .O M r V Q I O 1 wH 1 M P O m M P m N O 1 x 0 1 N O WNC I ur w 1 •O s- M �t r < W 1 ¢ 6 £ 1 1 oz 1 1 t 1 r 1 1 1 I ww I I 1 O 1 I 6 1 1 Ow I F= I Z6' I ZrI l 1- 1 O 1- 1 Z Z W I O 1 QK I N Nvt 00 MM MN�0101,1 O I \1 r PP 00 rr VO•m Wm u 1W.1 . . . u I1 M PP 00 mm i PP ra-m PmmOVN Q 1 Z-Nm 1 b PP dd .td � rr r1nN 1nmMNPO 1 ¢c I m I F I 1 F I M I w0 1 1£ 1 I W 1 I CW 1 I Z I I � I I I I I I 1 I 1 M O N Nit N Nh MmNNN I I O O Nc- N NN MmONO I 1 I 1 1 I I I It 1 1 I I I I I O e- O O W I I £ I Z I O N �Y1 hNNNYI Z I 01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I u 1 O O Nkft N N o M N M M N Y I u 1 O O O 00 O co O O O O O Z I Q 1 O O O 00 O 00 O O O O O 6 I I M .iM ��MMMMM I I I it m I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 N T I I O O O 00 O 00 00000 m I I M a- - 1 mac- -111, r r n rr r rr nnnnr O O O 00 O 00 o0000 O O O 00 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\\\\ P P P P P P P P P PPP P 0 0 0 00 0 Oct 00000 \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\\\\ M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O Oct O O O 0 0 0 0 0 Z 1 IY 1 P O I x 0 1 m u luzl o a l 0 1 0 1 > 1 1 Z 1 1 O 1 1 N 1 1 H 1 1 Q I 1 u 1 1 H 1 1 Z 1 1 o w 1 1 s J 1 1 £ m 1 1 O Q 1 1 U U Q 1 1 P I IY 1 U IY d Z I O W 1 w rc 10£I z M OY I ZQ I K N LL Z I W Z I U Q w 6 1> I ¢ 3 O J m l 1 d e Q 1 1 W W U 0 1 1 J £ JI 1 W N n 'm I I F F o aa1 I O fLL I NJZ I I O `O O M O J I .0 l M \£ W 12 Z I M m¢ S I W I O J I > I w•• I W£ LL 0 1 I M d IYQOO I 6K I Y 1 M M W OO-Z I U 1 N N Iw01 A r c w.<1 x z I a aUmlu 1 P A PLO PP �Ommmm O Or c OO OOOOO M m m m m m m m m m m m o O oo O o0 00000 a O O O O O O O p 0 0 0 M f C 6' W 6' N W W J C J o a r 1- S H Z N f Z W In Z O 0 z W � LL l LL M J £ O J W £ N J rc O 3 N H ¢ Z Z Z K o w O O O Q W LL' N N N £ f f M w C J Z N w w W Q M d O r P O •O A P N N r M N N M N N N N N N N N N r r n n n n 1 p 1 I w I I 0 1 I W z I N 0 I w 1 0 0 1 1 O I O I £ I 6 I p Q l d I H Z I I LL 6 I I w x I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m m N N 00 O O O P P No N O O IO IO Mr PIO c-O 4OdNO 0 a I Y I O O r r 00 O O O PN N O O r r �NrN NVIMPm .. of I I WZ I P P P P VIP M M 4N N N N r O O N N Ma-NMc-N COOe-aim I x0 1 N N N N N N Nd A N N 4V r r r P P rPmOP0��O.tN I UO I m m -O 4 �f �tN P M M mA•O •omM�r��N £I M M N N r r 1 I VI N I r 1 I O 1 I O 1 I N I I \ 1 I P 1 O I I \ 1 I M 1 I O 1 I 1 I F w 1 1 w Q I £ p 1 1 i[ K k K K ae iI i1 � is I 1 N I.I I 1 q 0 Q 6 6 Z q Q 6 Q 6 N Q W I 1 0 O 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 U 0 Z 0 2 I 1 O m O O O L O O O O O O f u I 1 } H H F• f Z f H !- N f- I -I f w I 1 6 0 J 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 2 0 q 0 J I ZI L O Q O O LL O w O O O d 0> O >>>>>>>>>>> r 1 at L p u p z dd o 6' p z z p d' o »»»»»> JO I tit w Z Z ft Z Z W Z Z Z} Z w Z NNVINNNNVINNN Q O I h I N W } W h, W V U W Ill W O W W N > N I £ 6 1 y U > > » z > > > > J > W > U V V U U U U V V V U O\ I WN I J Z NN IllMMWNMH UU 6 6' WMMMIY rc0 I 1 I -1 W z 2 » L 6'O: 6'd'O: d'C. d'd'6'O: dN 1 I'Iu 1 O U• W W. W NN W J F.HUuuuuuwf d\ 1 w I d' 6' £ W W V J 1 W U U U U U U U U U V U 6 M 1 W I } W T f H Z W N N W f W W W W W W W W W W W O 1 p l 6 L Q Q Q Q Q Q K O J J J J J J J J J J J W 1 I 6 W 6 3 3 p LL IJ I:J d 2 W W W W W W W W W W W K •• 1 I 1- 1 1-00 1 1 O N d N MM O M�NdIOOaO r-N�� I I O N O 0 0 O M O a N 1 1 1 1 1 It I 1 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ZQ 1 1 P 4 O MN b M11 N IMa-0000000 �� W 1 1 v d m MM N d � .} M w W 1 1 O N M M N N N IO N N N N N N N N N N N N d d dd.fdd�t d.td Ltd 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O N O N O I z 1 O O (DO O O 00 0 O O OOOOOOYO VOI N N I 0 O 1 O O A (DO O O 00 O O 00000000000 I O Z I O A A M O M M N M M M M M M M M M N N I U I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 u I 1 Q I O O O 00 O O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I 1 I Z O I w I r r I r AN r r r r d r A r r r r r A r r r r r I M I O O 0 O O O O 00 0 0 O 00000000000 I p w 1 £ O O .-I00 O O 00 00 O 00000000000 1 I q N N -IN N "N N N N N K N N N N N N N N N N N N N V< 1 I 0 \ \ Q \ \\ \ \ w w t9 \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ 1 u p 1 m 0 a O O WOO OI-MM a0 0 0 m 0 a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I W 1 O O O u 0 I0 0 0 O O O O J O O O O O O O O O O O O O I x I K\ \ \ M\\ \ \ \\ Q \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ 1 U 1 6 M M m M p M M M M M M um M M M M M M M M M M M 1 1 O O Z O 00 O O O O .IO O w N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Y 1 w w K p O w I Z 1 O O O .0 W O O O O O O .0 H O p O O O O O O O O O O O I m 1 q 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O 00 L O Z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N q 1 1 U O < W Z O N I I S 3 p 2 £ O 2 1 1 N 0 1 •O I w } } Q W 0 H O I OZ I w w W W u u x O u Q LL I I H J J J f y q O Q 1 w¢O 1 ZP =a >P >aa WP wm Z O, WO ZN O:PPO•PPP•O .O--0 V 1 L w Z 1 0 0 3 0 Q O O -la -1, < M W K O Z W I-10 0 0 0 0 0 w w w w 0. r 1 QS 1 JM O Qa0 A Om a0 LL0 Qmm � O I+0 Oooa0oa0QOOQQ 0 IZUV 1 O <0 JO JOO .O O moo LLO O JOOOOOOOOOOO O 41 o 1 W O Q O "a "00 .0 Z O moo 0 O } O Q O O O O O O O O O O O N z 1 o> 1 ILI AO WO WOO -1 QO OOO 20 QO I-100000000000 \J21 O> I W M S x J £ U H O K =M1 OI Z 1 d O u U a0 J J M W Z 1 J Z Q Q 0 W N Q J 6 \M O I w I Q O Ono 0 O W w O u £ M£ I> I u u u uPP p LL 04 OWJ I I MN m Opt p•• I W I P r al, r MO O N N WLLL 1 OU I MO ro M mOO m ON NMN Oa0 0 PhHVI VI VINVI I/1 IA Inr <W 1 Z0 1 MM MO wo NN, NA �iN MNV AN AO NOO000»> 0 l QO: I 001 O AN a0O NNo 00 am ONO MM MA NOOOOOOOO 1O aD'�Y{it dU} 1 p>Z 1 OA N Nam OPO co OM ONO• MP Md O=w=wrl�-IWW WO wO. 1 ZZ 1 00 ON 00 0O�O00 00 Om Opt O= O.t Ozzze:s o: o: o:s o:O K O: .a 1 WI -I 1 00 ON ON 000 OM od OPN OS OI OQQQQQQQ>>Qm 6du 1 > 1 ON 00 pO 000 00 Oz 00— 06 O.O O»»»y»>� N 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 AMNNPNc-PNP�tAPc-ON O O O O MM M O O �M O M M 1 Y 1 �.1NMN OHO aOnNONMP•O N O O O O MP N P P O O NNE P P c I WZ I NV10 YI OO YINOMdnOO YIdnN a 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 P M vl M 1 xo I O O 0 Wa0d M M M O O NNE} O Al N 1 V O I .00 s-v t- POMOMN p7 OD N N PYI N O O � 1 £ I 1 I M 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 K it 'k is 1t k 'k it I 1 I I J J J J J J J J 1 I < 6 6 6 6 Q Q 6 1 I f- I I 0 O 0 0 O O O O - O 1- I I 00 < OO I 2 1 u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u p £ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O I O I »»»»»»»» £ O C 6 O O C I M 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z z z Z Z Z Z Z I F 1 W N W U W U U W U W W W W U W I £ d 1 u u u U U u U U U u U u u u u u > > > > » > > > O > > > > 1 W.1 M ........... J N .0 N N N 1 !-MI 6'CC O: LC O:'CO O: CC CG 1'1'6'N. 6'R'OC J 3 I MUI O W WW W wwM W I N1 UUUUuwUwUw.UUuuu d ZZ Z www Z 1 W 1 W W W W W W W W W W W WWW W W r O 00 O M O I MI J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Q S S S S << 4 < 2 I 1 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 6 6 6 6 6 U 3 S 3 LL 1 1 1 I O N 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q a Q O O O O O O O O o O N M N N N N M YIO N 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 11 1 I I 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 P Y N Y N I 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O N I 1 ddd d�f �t V �t Vet V l d.tdd N V Ltd d V �t mid �t I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I tOOOa O O NN O Al � N z 1 Z 1 OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O QOOOC,OOOO 0 O 00 O O OM 0 0 O 1 0 0 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O 0 O O O O 1 oz 1 aaannAnannnnaann o o .r.r o ulao �r 1 V 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I u I O ao ao W I 4 1 QOO Q0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 O 0 0 � O 1 w 1 AAannnAannana AAa a A aA a a Ana A 1 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I C W I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O I Q 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ u I UC I QOOOOGOQODODODCOCOODOCOOQ P 00 40 w w w 1 w 1 0000000000000000 0 0 00 00 0 a 0 OCOQ 000 0 0 I U I F M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 1 I 000000000000000000 O O 00 O O 000 O 1 Y 1 M 1 Z 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 000 O 1 O] 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O moo 0 O O 000 O Q 1 1 Z O Z O -1 I 0 O O Z I 1 M M N I • O I o O I 0 2 1 LLI I W V O Q I II .O�0 00O�0n1a1a1n 00n10 O0 O00111n1 d u l zwz MO:•0 OP 0 ££OPOP =0 VU•OO 0�OaQ O A I <S I OOONOOOOOOWOOOOOOOOOOOO M OWQ £00 ¢a HOOaO O <1 Z V I J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O U 0 0 00 O H O O a O O < 1 O I ¢ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O u 0 W O w 0 0 0 a O N 1 1 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL J O J O O O > O J O O O H O > \Jz 1 o> 1 w Q W W f ee Y 2 O 1 G I W Z 1- H Omn I Z I 7 XM W N Q K N \MIO I W I x M W .,AIA S W 6 1 Q M£ 1> I M J Zo z 00 01 O OQ 1 1 J I I u nn a v C•• I W 1 P NN �f P W£ 1 O U 1 P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 V M O O O W O n N M Pm `D C¢0 1 zv 1 MM YIP Na NNan vin 6 0C I 0 0 I N OOOO»>OJO»>000 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O PO aNM O N N -M M M M O P O Y 0 0 woo- I c>Z I WOH I zz I OMMMVMMMMMMMvvMMM OOC 6'6'OC OO OC 2'2'OC 6'LL'OC 6'6. 6'O' - A 00 NN 00 OYIYI OOb MHO O.t 00 00 Owwl' Oa0 a0a OM OM M, O`. !(`1 �(�'•I i�M o:mM 1 wv I 06¢66000Q6¢«¢6QQ 00 OP Orr a� OM ONNN Ow d nu1> 1 O » » » » » » » » ON Od OPP am 00 ad a, 0 M b 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 z I Z 1 01 O=I u 1 u 1 a 1 I 1 1 W I � I G W I \H I Y Q 1 ucl w 1 S 1 1 u I 1 I 1 Y I 1 Z I 1 m I In a 1 I 2 I 1 1 • O 1 0 01 . I z LL I O I d I J I I <IWWOI N I=WW z I n 1 a x 1 O �1 Zu i O I P1 O I O M a 1 Z I O 1 W I M=1 > O N 6 I I J I 1 G • • I W I W£ O I O U I 1 Z. 1 <W 0 I 001 d 1.•JY 1 0>Z I W WI Z Z I KI W�-I 1 dM. a! 1 > i W t0 O O e-a-a0r-d a0�NV��r- In n n O O M M Pln .t In N AP •O O O CO CD a-de-�t a0 c-O OON�� n P P O O n n •OP O P P N� A N N V �t PPInP�M Pln InnPP M P P O O a0 W M P P r-A a0 �t �1 MMPMMPMNNNMM V P P �t d �t V MN •O A A Inn N � •O A �O N e- 00 b �O r- � M M M d Hi it � i0 M i0 it i0 it K J J J J J J J J J a a < a Q < a < < f f 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O W O W O O O £ 0 O U 0 O £ O L s F 0 U 0 0 L C E z z U z L C 0 O O 0 U C C Z Q Z Z 2 Z Q Z Z N W N W UUUUUU W W N W LL W U W W >>>>> UU W J J N N N N N N N N N N N W J W N F• W N N J J Z J 6 Z O O W W W W W W W W W W W 6' O 6' d' ZZZZZZ ZLEZE W 6' C ZLL W ZZ r r o_o_o_o_o_o_Jo o_o_o_0 1- r z oQ 1- 00 6 < NS 2 4 Q 2C Z SS d 6 d666ddG66d66 M 6 (0 61:1 �-I 66 O O MCI POONNNNNNPP M O N dN N I/IM O O O O •-N N NN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 �O V MOMOe•rc'-�� O O O, �t V Mddd.f d�iV Vet tl'V M e0 YD fV �t dot P P ref �NNYl V1 Y�� N P �N YI a�N O O O Y1 Ylr I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 O O Y1OOOOOOOdoo O O 00 N no O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 O o O O 000000000000 O 0 O 00 O no O O MMMM� .}.t .f dlnAA O O M Md d d 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I �OOOo OOOQOO N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O no O 00 W 1- A A A A A A A A n n n A A A A n Q A A A A A n O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O 0 0 00 O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 00 O no N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N f N N N N N N P P OOO[Oa00Da0000000a0 P W00 a0 t0 p O N 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 O 0 O O WO 00 0 0 no 0 \ \ Z\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ M \ \\ \ \\ M M O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C M M M M M M W 0 0 l00000OOOOOOO o o 0 00 0 00 f W d O O 6 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 WO WO on 0 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W O J O on O 00 r1 o J z o a r £ J 2 f Z N H O Q O O z W � U U LL M M J £ O 1 J W E P NP ..NNNNNNNNNNN Wo P rA <—O �O .00 O O WO-la-��c-�� WO r0 QW ww Zw mww U M WM LLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW ZW QM WO u00 O00 =00 t0 O LL O Q o O O O O O O O O O O O <0 = O N O 0 0 O o O W C[ K u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < O K Q O Z O O ma z O o 6 I d 4000000000000 3 0 O d W O 0 0 0 00 000 Q N N J £ S J a a W M Z N W W W W W 6 M M 000000000000 `t `* P P 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P O P P VO MO ,M MW EOM AA PNN MO PMNYNd O dM N�----c�---- MO A NO OHO `O .O �O .O �O .O.O .O �O �O .O ON 00 MO NMP Nr O MA MA OowOA M00 NCO NCO NO , 4 00 00 OPPPPPPPPPPPP OA 00 00 OMB 00 0, GQ�-0.4Nt ON ON 00 ON 00 OMn OP ON Ot b v Y I z I m I AwmM o MN P ddCOM Oln aOd PaDO NN dOPNMN Oop W N M N v CDOMOYI 1 1 1 1 1 MHO ��O V ITN NYI YI J Q 3 O A NAN AIn oa-InA ��n O �P�OMN 00 00 0 0O O 000000 J 6 F z K W C�trCl�� 1 1 •O O N O N O O M O O O YJ 1 •0 O O O N M O O N O O 0 u q I w F 1 P M O N V m N N O O 0 x O I M �O 'O h 0 N N N O O O UH m 0 I N N M M �t N N O O O I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 Z 1 Z.1 J Q I OFI MWI 6Z I •O .O o, 00 NN 00 NN M1dM 00 00 MM 00 00 o0 00000 \1 •O.O •00�0 00 mNwmlNO 00 NN M 00 00 NN 00 00 00 00000 W.1 u-1 PP mNM 00 NMw,wN �l �t 00 PPm NN NN 11 00 OO 00 NONNN ZH 1 MM INM �O �O �tMme-mM AA 00 m`ON NN NN 00 00 OO 00 ANNNN qo 1 NN INM NN ��Od M MM .fd MAc- NN NN 00 00 00. 00 a- f I MM H O I £ 1 W I WWI W 1 Z 1 I I N 00 1Pe-'-NCO1 N MM O O O 0 00000 I 1 I 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 d 00 NOOK N V O O O N N ��-��•- 1 O O �i �t J' M NNNNN 1 Z I M MM MNNNN N N NN M M I 0 1 N N 1 O I ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I u l M O O O N N N N N O I u l O 00 O 0 -000 0 0In O O O O O O 00000 I 4 1 O 00 O A O 000 A O 0 00 O O O A n O 00000 I I A 0 0 A , M M M M N N O O M v N M H I I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I� 1 I I 00 1 1 O 00 O 00000 O O 00 O O O O O O 00000 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I A Ah A 000 A A AA A A M1 A n A 0 I 1 O 00 O 0000000 O O 00 O O O O O O 000000000 I 1 O 00 O NNNNN O O 00 O O O O O O OOOOO I 1 N NN N NNNNN N N NN N N N N N N NNNNN I w 1 N NN N NNNNN N \ NN \ N N \ \ \ NNNNN I F I N NN N NNNNN N N NN N N N N N N NNNNN I q I O 00 O NNNNN O O 00 O O O O O O NNNNN 1 1 \ N\ \ NNNNN \ N \ \ \ N \ N N NNNNN I I M MM M MMMMM M M MMm M M M M M M MMMMM I I O 00 O NNNNN O O 00 O O O O O O NNNNN 1 0 0 1 I •Z I 1 6 1 1 I. 1 M 00 O NNNNN N �O 00 O O O N N O VV�t Vet Jim I P PP P PPPPP P P PP P P P P P P PPPPP 1 x0 1 A AA A AAhnn A A rr n h M1 A n A AM1AAM1 I uz 1 O 00 O OOOOo O 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 O 00000 I= 1 O 00 0 0000o O 0 00 O O O O O O 00000 10 1 0 00 O 00000 0 0 o0 O O 0 0 0 O 00000 I > I I I H z z £ N N N O U I I J U W W Z O C G 6 6 Z H H H I 1 F• a w a a o: z Z z z 0 w O O r0i O: 1 1 Z 1 1 Z 0 N Z W W U 6 4 Q Q m I I O O J J W l•J U W N £ I I R• 1' U > U J > > O LL Z I W Z I U O Z J J J Z Q 6 6 Z Z O K C K > > UO I I K J H 6 N N J 6 6 G 0 w W 6 Y £ Z £ 6 Q m U U U U C Y. U• S H H H J J o aa1 1 O f LL 1 I \•O H In 1 J 1 0 1 0 N M N N N N N m N M M omaJ I 00 1 M \£ W I Z Z I M W Q 3 I W I O J I > 1 C •• 1 1 o:aoo I 1 � A h A h A r h A m w m m m o wYY W F Z I W O I A A n A A A h M1 A A h A M1 ' I SZ I Maumlu I UM NPm 1 I OHO 1 I O O O •O A �t M O •0 O V V A 1u61 O I W H I 1n N P O M V m M A m •D •O WNK 1 UI- 1 M m A V �t O �t M A A m W I 1 L £ I I N N am I I OZ I 1 N I 1 wz I 1 60 I 1 6 I Z 1 0. IFZI 26' I ZM I I o Q 1 1t it it it it it 'k it it is f I O 1 Z 1£wI 0 1 QC 1 0000 000 00 • AA Ma-.t MM d OA N 00 �f O I \1 0000 a-Ot- 00 In In In PP ANP •O.O ANo NO 01n �0 �tOAom 0 O u wul u I um 1 U1M ONN PP 00 MM O�iV mm ONM Inu1A•0OIVOA mm •O �O Q I Zw 1 NMNA d1 � AA tee- PP •OAM NO`0VIAUIN MM V `O 16CI M PPm I, AA dd 1,PI A•Od N�0 MNNN MM A A I H I I NOI N N IZ I II I wwI I ZI I vl 1 I 1 1 I m P N N 00 m 00 a 1 1 000 MN NN O N 00 00 00000,0 O 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I MM d AM O M a-MInN, 6' 1 I YEN V1 MM M d4 In Nan V1 VIM Y1 1n w m I I N PP PP M�MMMMM M J J M £ I I Ni M �OM NN NN N N vi 00 V1 00 O 1 0 1 �1 �1 �1 �1 �1 �1 •1 •1 NN �1 .1 .1 1 �1 Z 1 01 111 11 11 1 II 1 1 1 1 II I111111 1 1 1 I 0 O 0 O I U1 000 NN M N 00 00 O 1- f Y 1 u1 000 00 0 O O 00 0 0 00 OOOQOO 0000000 0 Z 1 QI 000 00 O O O 00 O 00 0000000 O Y v� Q 1 I U1 V A Y11l� V1 M �1 00 �I �I �I U Y m 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I W U I 111 1 11 1 S W } 1 1 000 00 O O O 00 O 00 0000000 O u x I I Y \ w I I Q Y H I 1 m Z rn 1 1 a M I 1 m ILI W I I AAA AA A A A AA A AA 00 A J K I 1000 00 O O O 00 0 00 000000000000 1 1000 00 O O O 00 O 00 0000000 O 6 Y 1 1 NNN NN N N N NN N NN NNNNNNN N U IW 1 \\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\\\\\\ \ W IH 1 "NN NN N N N NN N NN NNNNNNN N x 16 1 000 00 O O O 00 O 00 0000000 O u Io I \\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\\\\\\ \ 1 1 MMM MM M M M MM M M W 1 I 000 00 O O O 00 O 00 00 0000000 0000000 O J 1 m 1 1 Q 1 1 r 1001 a 1 •z I 6 Id I I I N I I H Z IIX I 4 � � 00 O 'N � �d N 0 Iw 1 PPP PP P P P PP P PP PPPPPPP P o Ix01'AAA AN A A A AA A AA AAAAAAA A U IUZI 000 00 O O O 00 O 00 0000000 0 U 10 1 000 00 O O O 00 O 00 0000000 0 Q 10 1000 00 O O O 00 O 00 0000000 O > 1 I £ Q o 1 £ H u z 1 O Z v Q 1 u O U I W 1 LL f 2 N 1 1 0 o u r z rn J Z 4 Q W 1 O J Z 1 1 w H u N Z I 1 a z IL t- u m Q 1 I S W ILI W 1 M1' 1 V 6 W Z -1> O � 0 Z I O W 1 X U Q 1' m I O£ 1 Q 6 W U U W 6' J O d YIZQI r O o N 6 O O WZ IW Z I Z 0 N W N Z LL J Q I> I M f Q O Z O Jm I I = m Z 0' Z O N O N 1 t- Q I 1 Q W W O 2 J f UO 1 1 3 > 1-w Q IM N J N m I 1 Q O W Q 6 f w W W > > o aal 1 o W I NJz I I M A P P O N �t � N I I —v=J10 1 M •O P N` N N OMOJIGOI N N \£ W1221 MWQ31W 1 O J 1 > 1 w £LLO I I v N •O A m P O N M m600 I 1 m m m m m m P P P P QO I Y I N N N N N N N N N N I U I N l- s m.ra i xz i t, 66 M 1 U I c• I 1 o I 1 W I I or1 1 Nz1 W 1 O 1 N 1£ I 1 0 1 ¢ a I 6 1 rz I 1 Q I IW 2 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 b N O O O O 0 N O O N N nit m 0 0 0 O M M O O I Y 1 b N VO �O O O N NWm O O O O N N M O O O O N N O O V r 1 I WZ I P P mN M O O �imMNO N V � P P m N N N N O O 1 S0 1 M M IN •O �O mmc•�iM n n 0 0 m•O N N N N N O 0 I UO I N N IN M M N N .O �t � M M M M �T �t Mn N N N N a 0 O O I £ I 1 1 I 1 1 n 1 1 O 1 1 O I 1 N I 1 \ I I N I I O I I \ 1 I M 1 I O 1 I 1 I 1 I W 1 1 Q I 1 J C 1 > r Y I I J < J J J Z J Z J J J J J J u 1 1 a c a a < o a w ¢ a a < a a W I I r r r r r M r U r r r r r x I I r O O O O r O O 0 O O O N O r V 1 1 Z r W W r W r N r Q N 1 I W UU U W V• O V U W 1 1 Z K Z Z Z C W M K m Z Z K J 1 z 1 W O W W 0 W O LL 0 0 z O Z 0 O W 0 W O V 0 O n 1 01 U• O C C 1' O W C O > J O I .1 Q Z ww W W Z W w Z Z z Z 1-1 Z N Z z Z W w Z W w z Z N x Z z z Z Z QO I rl Z W W LL W UVUUO W W 1 W NO W W LL W W M W >N I £LL1 Q > zm > Z > ...W 1 > > Z > Mn > Z > Z > u > C > O\ 1 w w 1 Z 0 O N N N N r 0 O O at a O O w WN 1 ru 1 Q uu u u LL w rr u u C w 6 O 1 H U I W R' 6' d' 1' W x N N r 2 L\ 1 N 1 r N N n W W W W 6 N V I I N N U M QM 1 W 1 N O I C I < LLLL O QQ<<z W QQ LL LL J Z W I 1 3 UU N 3333M LL J WU• U U W W K •• I 1 � I to I 1 N OO N MM O 0 I I N 00 O 'ONP O O O O �1 O 1 I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I f I I 11 I 1 I I Z< ZQ 1 I b 00 s-OO,N N •D O O O N W 1 I N 00 N ddd.td �t N d.t O O �f �t X 1 I MM N NN M M W 1 1 M MM NNNMN N N NN M M N N I 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 r I M 00 0 N N NN O O N N 1 Z 1 O 00 O 000, O O In O O O O I oO I O no O ooO000n n O 0 00 0 o O n 1 O Z I - n no d M M M n I M N N O O M 1 U I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I < 1 0 00 O 00000 O O 00 O O O 0 1 1 1 11 1 ----v 4 1 11 1 1 1 f w f r rn n nnnnn n n nn n n n 1 1 O 00 O 00000 ro 0 OO 0 O 0 1 Owl O 00 O 00000 U O O On O O O 1 \r I N NN N NNNNN I+N N NN N N N 1 Y < I \ \\ \ \\\\\ c\ \ \\ \ \ \ 1 U G 1 I W 1 O 00 O w N Q 0 Q 0 O 0 Q 0 0 .0 0 O 00 O O O I S 1 \ \\ \ \\\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ 1 U 1 M M M M OM M M M M an M M M M m M r M I I O 00 O 00000 O O 00 O O NO 1 Y I w K c 1 Z I Jo 00 u 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 W O z O 00 O O n O 1 m I Q O 00 Z O r 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 O 00 O O O N 6 1 1 r < w Q Q ww Z Z 3 3 W O Z I 1 W H w r N z 1 •O 1 £ r Y Y 4 r d 01 02 1 Z N Z W W V 6 4 LL I I O O J J W N J 1 I S < 6 W O W K g I W O I > M V O O J O > 0 0 0 0 0 > N Hip no Z O w 0 ma V I£ w w Z l n I Q S 1 W n O n < n n n n n < n n n W n n 0 <1 Z V I O z 0 0 0 0 Z O J O O O o O Jo u vo 0 O O O mo O J O O 1 mM u U V O U O N Q I I N O J I I N O N O•• I W I m N Oaf WZOI OU I no N mNNNN m t I NN `O n PM Kw 1 z0 1 MV Nnn Nn Mn P INN On nn SON QK 1 OO I MO NOO MO NOOOM NOOOM NP Na NO NN 1 c>Z 1 `QM MHO O�-1�- mw On N- " O.O OM wo} w O r I Z Z I O I 0 1 O N N ON MON O<<< O N ON O N 01 Ono Ono O ON ON O N o V K LL'M I Wr1 1 ON Ono ON ON On 000 ON ON 66U I > I Opt 000 00 O»>On O>>>OO 00 00 000 00 00 QI Or M M wo M N ON ON{-,/ p�.1 � no O N 1 I 1 c I 1 W I 1 O I I NzZ I N O 1 W 1W.01 0 1 O I £ I Q O Q I 6 I F Z I II wx I w I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 O O O O 00000000 O 00 O O 0 r M< •} M M o I Y I O O O O 00000000 O <O NN O O N N P P rN P •O •O AN O I UHI I WZI O O O O 1 NNNNNN N ON N P P O O M M O•f d OD N ON M 1 x0 I O O O O NNNNNNNN A •1N P V d A A << •pP N P P BOA M 1 u0 I O O O O < M PP a0 A A d d r`O •t N•t O 1 41 < < M M •t N « M 1 I 1 I 1 A 1 1 O 1 1 O 1 N 1 I N I N 1 1 O I I \ 1 1 M 1 1 O I 1 1 1 I I W I I f I I Q I I W 0 I 1 1 1 w Y 1 I J J J J J Q J J J J r J u 1 1 a a a a a w a a a a o a W 1 I 0 Q 0 0 0 N 0 J 0 0 0 0 r 0 S I I y O J O O O W O O O O L O O x O F- N I 1 LL l9 w W W m< 0 N N 0 > 0 U 0 0 d' N 0 W Q 0 J 1 Z I O> O uuuuuuuu O UU O w O U O O O O LL£ O r 1 01 w O ZZZZZZZZ o» O W C O O Ca It G JO 1 .1 Z Z Z Z »»»» Z NN Z N Z N Z 2 Z I z NN Z QO I h 1 M W L W JJJJJJJJ W W W ( W U W W u W ZZ W >N I Cd 1 > Q > > > Z > N > > > > > > NN > O\ I WW NNNNNNNN uu xz O W N N dI fwI W K QQ 6o ul I I"I1 L W d'd'd'd'd'000 d'd• f J W W 00 d\ I NI 0 > 00000000 zz Q 6 Z WW z wo 6 M 1 W 1 U' J }}}} Y Y Y} Z Z H d O O N N O I C I Z M QQ6QQ QQQ 00 M 0 x ry l-I x >> W I I W N LLLLL££L V V u N 6 JJ d C •• I I �LL I HO I 1 < ww P N N 00 W' 00 .I 1 1 O O 00000000 NN O N 00 < 0 0 Ow 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I I 1 I I I I I ZQ 1 1 N <<<<<<<< mm O NN W 1 I •1 N NNNNNNNN MM M N •t •tN •t •1 •} d I I X I N N N PP < PP W I 1 N <N,N`Om NNN N N 00 N 00 1 1 N •t •t d •}•}•*•}dd •}V d •t d NN d NN 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 H I N 0««< NN M N OO N OO 00000000 0 1 z 1 O O O O O O O O 00 a O O O O O O O 1 0 0 1 A O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O O O 00 I 02 I <NM•t N•OA NN N M •t 00 M 00 I u I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I u 1 < < « < < I 6 1 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 O Oa 1 1 I I I 1 I W 1 r r r r r r r A r r r r r A A A r r r r I O 1 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O 00 O 00 I O W I O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 O 00 1 \Y- I N N wNNNNNNNN NN N N N NN N NN I uC I u< wQOOOOQQO z<< < < < < I W I W O w00000000 �-100 O O O 00 O i•00 I x I K \ Z \ M\\\11\\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ Q \\ 1 U I M O M L M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M U M M w w =0 1 1 O �+O 000000000 ZOO O O O 00 O v00 Q 1 Y 1 w f V u 1 Z 1 00 Q O O O O O O O O O H O O O O O W 0 0 O 1 0 0 1 m I O .0 LL O O O O O O O O F- O O O O O S O O O 00 N Q 1 1 Z Z O V f Z tw o O -1 1 O 0 J 0 .Z-1 Q Q w Z I 1 �-I O O J H N d' 1 • O 1 LL w N 4 OZ V N Z 6 N „ N N LL I I 4 O N £ 0H w 0 P M I d I M 1'• Q Z C f LL U G] Q I wz01 z d'N 60 uV•tddd•}•*•t LLbb aN w.p M ZOO JO ><N O u 1 L W Z 1 �•IP P P P P P P P P P P P X P U P P 0 P P Q P z P P O A I Q S I r Q A Q r r r r r r r A < A r W r U A r NN ON W r r d' O •1 zu I JO HO =�OOOOOO0000000000 �00woo O OO O moowoo o vi00 6 O Q I 0 I Q O Z O z O O O O O O O O woo 0 W O N O o < woo z 0 O O LL N F- I KO I •+O w0-100000000 00 00 O YO QOO 00 ZOO Z 0 Z C N O N ^'I Z J N N N > > 3 O QI < J 1 I 00 00 w O I w 1 00 00 W£ LL I O U I M N N r M P N P O O am N O O N CQO 1 Z001 1 MA Pr NNNNNNNN N 0 NQ ON 000 C0 NN N{d r Qs I 00 I NO MO MOOOOOo00 nor O ON ON 000 NN A•t •f N dU• } I c>2 I Nap Or OaOaDODepoDNNN omD Or Or Or 000 N< PP y O p W O F I x 2 1 ON ON O N N N N N N N N O N N 00 O< am O M M O d O«J 1 W=.I WM 1 ON ON ONNNNNNNN ONN 04 ON O•} Od•} OHO 000 •Cl ddU 1 > 1 00 00 000000000 ONN ON OP am ODD ON O« ;(� I 1:. a 1 I I I I I I z I 1001 I O Z I I u 1 1 u I I 4 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I w 1 I I I owl 1 \ I I Y < 1 u p 1 W 1 x 1 I U I I I I Y I I z I I 1➢ I N 6 I 1 O z I 1 Z 1 1 N 1 • O I 0 d I OXI LL 1 I J I I 4 1 W w 0 1 ru1£wzl I < x I o Izu 1 o a l o I N F I I O> I \J Z I aPH I 1 O M a I z 1 \M O 1 W I M Z I > O O z w o r I Z Z I W W. I W� I 6 6 V I> 1 r MNOd00 O OV N �O �tOA00 M a-O .. . . .ON r to !b . OVNY1 AInN N ��O MNNN �� t M Mr e- f0 N 0000�00 N NY1 VtM V1 tt1 nnnnrAA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 N N N N N N N 0000000 < M M M M M M M < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 ILI N m UPPPPPPP <0000 000 LL 00000O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J v A N A r A A r A A 00000000 00000000 O00 �O A N O ON N ON O O c&� 4 XP QuMAL COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Receive and Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2007 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: C STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated January 31, 2007 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. Respecltf�ully submitted, V (v John M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for submission by: yz-4 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment : 1. Revenue and Expenditures Report, January 31, 2006 2 BAR MEMORANDUM TO. La Quinta City Council FROM John M. Falconer. Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT Treasurer's Report for January 31, 2007 DATE: February 28, 2007 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending January 31, 2007. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Department. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Endina Chan e Cash (3) $ (2,154,406) $ 7,116,447 (1) $ 4,962,041 $ 7,116,447 LAIF 38,630,025 11,106,000 (2,100,000) 0 47,636,025 9,006,000 US Treasuries (2) 103,461,058 31,000,000 (19,000,000) (353.577) 115,107,481 11,646,423 US Gov't Sponsored Enterprises (2) 28,985,010 13,000,000 (7,500,000) (183,644) 34,301.366 5,316,356 Commercial Paper (2) 20,895,343 7,000,000 (9,000,000) 42,184 18,937,527 (1,957,816) Corporate Notes 2,921,547 3,719 2,925,266 3,719 Mutual Funds 8,072 033 1(3,887,263)4 184,770 3,887,263 Total $ 200,810610 $ 69,222447 1 $ 41,487263 $ 491318 $ 228,054,476 $ 27243,866 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled Jnvestments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. I As Treasurer of the City of La Quints, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. 3/ S 2,o 7 J---t— ohn M. Falconer Date Finance Director/Treasurer Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from — the previous month (2) The amountreported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. (3) The cash account may reflect a negative balance. This negative balance will be offset with transfers from other investments before warrants are presented for payment by the payee at the bank. O000144 3 Treasurer's Commentary For the Month of January Cash Balances — The portfolio size increased by $27.2 million. The major reason for the increase was the receipt of $24.7 million on January 24`" from 1st installment of property and other taxes from the County. In addition, the City received an additional $2.67 million from the County on January 315L for sales and vehicle in -lieu taxes. Investment Activity — The Treasurer has been increasing the LAIF holdings in January to take advantage of an 18 basis point advantage over US Treasuries. At month end, the sweep and cash account had $4,937,027 balance which was created by the aforementioned $2.67 million County receipt and the receipt of a $2.15 million bond draw. These balances were reduced by transferring $2.6 million to LAIF and investing $2 million in Commercial Paper in early February. The sweep account earned $ 5,024 in cash for the month. The bank fees for the month were $ 2,033 which resulted in a net increase of $ 2,991 in real savings. Portfolio Performance — The overall portfolio performance increased by eight (8) basis points and ended at 5.14% for the month. At the end of January, the portfolio yield was sixteen (16) basis points over the benchmark which was the same as December. With the short average maturity of 86 days, the portfolio yield should remain at these levels. The Treasurer will continue to invest in short term investments based upon the yield curve. At this time last year, the portfolio was yielding 4.06% and the benchmark was at 4.44% for a 38 point difference so we have made progress in meeting our benchmark. The Treasurer has been investing more in LAIF and has not been investing in longer than six months Treasury securities or in will be investing in longer than six months GSE's based upon the yield curve to take advantage of yield spreads. Future Thoughts The Treasurer will continue to invest in short term maturities to take advantage of the inverted yield curve — Commercial Paper with 30 to 60 day maturities and Bond proceeds will continue to be reinvested in six month Treasury bills as they mature. LSE's will be rolled over for no longer than six month maturities. 001PO1) 4, )) �,�d m c c z c c Z c 0 z o Z c 0 Z z o z o � 0 Z a E rn a cn o m ma � C 0 N m 5 co_ _ o o oa oE EEEE c E m w $ O 0 E MVfMMW p O O �mJ O� OOi 40)0 N S OJ w m a e e 00 O P J OI S N m n o i4 0 m M N a d y O �+ '00000 o oOoo Pa O N � O �SOOn m M N 0 H E o$$$o e vi e �v000O$ e EL o0000o o e N ' $SS$$ S$$$o$$$$ c� o a o O o 0 m 0 0 0 0 0$ o 0 0 GOO 0 $$ J�00 e e ILm _yJ N N O pe u? NOOSN n000i. P$$OOS a0000 og$$$ �'+oo M a m a o 0 aY 0 m � O�bOOd NAM IhN�MM�MT �O$ H � O O w w cE 0000 $$0$$ 000000000 $$$$Oo00o 00000 0 =$ o$ O m$ o$$ d` o o ao e a LLQ p� �p O 00000$ 00000 gj p 0000S0000 MmMlh SOS 00 ry $ $ a� 4 ly Vj OjM< N M M a cN m 5 w c Z N 16 E C$ ¢ O E£ d L p my O E E m c o@ o n@ _o d m v m gym .m `oo LL �$n Q @ 000 g =mm my fou :c o m Ua YmE ry m o m m o m m 9 fa B o a .i a m E Zi S a t E c p m a Z U o u m a c a m U T o c E E ym m m e E; c€«moo ocE o =Tic t5 i'a� E > m m Em ELL z_x_xULL� x _my Z. EUv! u >m EN@@N m{o^d c wm Qow p;w mo TAU m U m 0om ENcaQMry =r pNc SE i bN r UL _ r u Ec y U E S y _ M R d LL a w `o `o om mmwZ. �h; ww al N m m G N N C C c "of u wmm Somraryal Holdm9 PIY, ftelerebprenl A9eoq aM FnamnB Au1M1mry Janwry 31, 2007 Bank Axwnts NIe24 A. Unrtallaetl Markel Name-AvaAaEil siom. TIO Ra Rate Bon, IMvul Ginn Loss Vim. Imok W¢I5 Fer9o-CemmO Yu LheW�q 1 000% E 2T3I,]21 WA WA S 2,224,]21 S ].1"'67 WNIS Fargo-SWecy Yu Sweep 1 4WX 2,]12.3(16 5.024 2]t],330 2.712.3W PNNCasli-ciomi Na WA t WA LOCO WA WA 1000 1,000 "s Fa -OmaM Y. CMMIn t OW% 24014 WA WA 94014 M0]4 TdN-Bank PccwMs E 4,962041 E 496I0&5 S,B4B,]9T U.S Go.2mmml SFms,aiif etpls D..V PircNle3 A.. P,oNlt, 0 Markel Wye Par 3eltlemed CwlWnn- AralaGli paerR Ra Pale VNae Ininesl C2b1 Loss Valw IO Mabn Valve Odle NMUNaw YOM-D. Y. Foe Mac 1 500W% E 2.958,209 S (12509 f 29x5,]W 100 J,000,WO 12V)A6 BaMd New VOM-OmaM Yes FHIB t I5W0% 1,995,512 9,80 (543) 2.004.Yil 110 2WO,W0 11/pA16 Bank d New Ywk-Cemantl Yea FFCB 1 5 7 4,609,W5 (1,258 4,BGB.W] 121 4.7a. 3 11A]F6 Bank 0Neu Ypk-W�nd Yu FretlEie Mac 1 50N% t440.9W 110,510 4p30A50 84 4,5CO.000 1v1Y Dankof TOM-OamaM Y. FHLB 1 5A25% ].918,891 ws 7,919,M 72 0,0[O,WO 1/12(1W] WMMNew Vdk-OnreM Yu FNM4 1 SSW% 4,996,531 w.w (1,218 5.W1,900 20 5.000.WO v1nW8 Bank of New Y"A DmwO Yu FFLB 1 5060% 4,09J,062 (562 6,m2.500 153 S.M.= vwff0] BaM d New YoM �nmd Yes FHL MON a-PswnI NOM 1 51W% 2N230 1254 2H3,500 /61 15WW0 ]H]11W6 Tolal - US Gcnogr enl 5ewntlu f Sit 1366 E 96,530 S .098 E 34.3N,BW 34.CAU. E 58.166159 U B Rmany1 timmnt O¢25nV AmNe yi Par CkdNAn -Av hTom Pan Ral[ V5.M roormt Mieresl M,fLo ) Wtl Lws V.I.VWe IO Merlon VOWe Ow. Wl() Dio BaM d New YOM GenaM Yu US TonmuY 1 4.9W% E 5,&55,620 i 140 E 5&R,]EO 1]6 40W.W0 in1rsW] Bafid Nm Ywk-Oaa¢n0 Ya o US Trmmur 1 B,BR,911 229 99 9.OW.WO 1t94W0 BankMNeu Vak Cencntl Yu US Trmarvy BJl ul 1 411 48]5% 9,84594] (i4]) 9"5240 113 10,[OO,OCO Bank of Nex Ywk-Oatantl Yu US -Treasury Bll 1 4965% 14,631,BW 1,510 4M,4W 14,W9,4W 1]6 15.WO,OW la4rzW8 14520]] Book al New Yak -CUB. Yen US Tree Bfl 1 49W% 9] 322 2]0 9.159.6W 17. 100]0000 1)1`Jt00) Total -US Tromol If 40,9766W 3 - d 1.410 E 40.9]B,1W SO,WO.IXO MMum Telm Nale OismnV AnvNss3 Amued Urcealrsetl Merkel nos Per Sellbnve CualOtl¢n-Availa s IswbAr Pa Rate Vane IMeresl WN Lms Vabe bMa Ve4e Wie WMUNew YaF-DalaM Yu Gmeal Ekohk t SWW% f 2925268 2]510 MB E &0 �e 623 SW00t0 10llBTG 7.1 McBlum Tnml Nala f 2925,266 f 2]518 f fi ]98) S ;044980 f S[N0W PM1ra Cmmmttrlal PaP> (%stwN AomloO A Nl Unreal>m MCMG Oays Pa Sit. Lusbtlan-AvaiMWl Lssner? Pan Pale Value Maul Gam Leas Value I. MaI Vane Wb BmkalNeu Ywk-OmAnd Yes N"'nohCom 1 52W0% E 2.99J.124 f (101 S 2,M. 16 S.M.= 12QW2W8 BaMtc/New Ypk-Wmaitl Yea GlGroup FUMloq lnc 1 52200% 29]6,481 (1.50]) 2,9]4,8]4 55 ],W00W 01R5.9] 9mkd New Yak-O omo` Yin, Rcc1W 8 WmEle t 525t0% 1.998,5]4 (114) 1,996AW 12 2.W0.K0 1211&L6 Bankol Nem Yoek-Dm Yu Nutle Ca t I 1 5.1900% 994.9t0 (4W) 994,430 3G 1.",= MAW WMdNew YOM-OenaM Vu PmmAnn Hom% 1 52W3% TR,1W (93) 990.OS2 13 1,OW,WO IM7= 6 W.WNaw ywk'WrreM Y.Pmal®n HmCa 1 522WX 1,990,573 1961 1,998,477 5 2.OW,0.0 12/fNrIM Wok MNeu Ywk'Wmaod Y. ATIT 1 5)Z0U% 2.983,014 16,908 3.WO,OW 40 3,0]0,CC0 01n61!] 61ko lim Ywk-WmaM Y. Gen"Eme Copeal 1 52O 939.716 (20) 9"aw 2 /,OW,0.0 1LD7NB BankWNex Y[M-Oena1E Yu MoAmin Stinky 1 52330% 3997WS in 29%BR ] 30mM 1v1593 ToN-Room Cwnionow Pa 3 1093]52] f 14295 S 10951792 vi...W0 LEA kwuVreM FUM In1e251 Acwetl Prealaahle MaMtl Wysb Ae4nikYnpenrnl SMkeay Mvu9nwM Name-AAHI T Fan Rafe Bmk Inlerul GaINLom Vqw MaM Fess C!@ Fen AlaveO lA1F-Gy-Oemaq Yna Sole Pcd WA 516X f 34.059,825 WA WA 1 3t d1%-OtrmVwl, linlg0 WNt% 1AIFPOA-Oen®M Y. SIab PM WA 510% 135]6 0 WA WA 1 2t J/%-Otrm 12n1.O0 50Mt% Tdal-Stele POq S Q.839.025 Tod, CH, Innoon is S 15 R 0]9 S Imuff f 25A17 WA f Ii,"o .1. t24,040 f 2511 WA Toml CM Cash BlmaeNwnd CD Ciryala CumM S ,oflraanps Cin. RMpaMngnea Apens, eM Flrelwlp AumoMy January 31. 2W7 PaBdm-RVAlmeslmnte Qulodan nnn Su us Iswerrt Ra mtsesl RMe Anr Value AwueO mkreel unredzM Gem te¢5 ."d Vwe M, 40N Par Value Sedans Vale 2CO2 P3M US BaM-CIP Yn USTreaury BW 1 <808% f ].B4].929 f 12AB9 f ].015.Bi0 141 B4OW,OW 122106 2COIFWncenNnpNy LIP Yes USTreaswy BA 1 5.005% 24,810,628 (12.128 24.00OM 5] 25.CW.CN 091 2SC Flnance AlMptly LIP Yes U.STreasMW t 4870% SM9.458 (20BI 8.939,2`A 50 9.OW.000 0921A6 2004 FInana AUN -CIP Yn USTr= Sm 1 4880% 24524 no 6528 24518 141 250WOW 1Y21A0 Taal US Tmau S 66,130,]9tI (.WilS 66,iW.8J01 6].Ovi.00O Pnllrio-W., MM M. F-de Tn,slee- AvasaCl Su es Money MaM1Ot kNWaI FUM Re Re. Book Pmuetl mlereM Unreaina0le GvW(. Merkel VaWe Daysb Fend ro Merepmxnl Fees C cCenIC US Bank -Prwd _ Yes ty Pme�n 1 4690% S 303 WA S W2 1 1%B ClIy He Raialw2aMs AO%aAevego Use, Cc Center U S Belk - Debt Svc Yes t=nces, 1 4690% WA 1 t WBCIry We Revenw Bmm 1994RDAUS Bank-0e!X c Yes ImAneMal 1 46W% WA 1 19945MnIMtlsRM1 1W5RDAUSBank-CIP Yes to Ame n 1 4690% WA 1 I Rwmp Bcnev-RM 162 1995RMUS.Bank-SpsvMF.d Yes 1M Amvlml 1 4.690% WA 1 1995 ROUsiIgBWnk-RDA 182 2000 FMAUN-ty95 US Sank- Y. 1MA ,icsn 1 4.6W% WA 1 W 24 FIremM Ip PLmy 1YARDAUSBnv*-CIP Yea 1MAnen. 1 469IY19 WA 1 1p09 Seln BcrW-RDAs IMFMU5Benk-10te c Yes 1. Anengen 1 4.856% WA 1 19�9eles Batla-RDA2 1938 FMU.SSvnk-Seedy Feq Yes im Amvmn 1 4(We WA - 1 1MFk evl BpMa-RM182 199BRDAUSBmk-CIP Yes 1si R 1 469G% WA 1 189BS .BOMs-RM2 nOl FM U S. Bank - Me Svc Yes wAneken 1 4690% 1 WA 1 1 2(I019ala Grtls-RDA1 ml RDA US. B"-CIP Yes tslMrcRwn 1 4WJ% WA 1 ZOUt SeIes BCMs-PfM1 2 RMUS.eeM1-OMSvc Y. 1aMe6nn 1 4"% 1 WA 1 1 20025MnBa1 -RM1 2002 FDAUB.Bem-CIP Yea 1sINreM1ai 1 4650% 701,2W WA 7O1,H] 1 20W SMUBan65-ftMl 2003T.WRDAUS Bank -IDS Yes I.A.1 46904 t WA 1 1 20WSed BnLLs-RDA1 200]TavaCkftM U. S. Bank -COI Yes 1sl Anakan 1 48W% - WA - 1 XN135eIfla BdLLs-RM1 2CW Taxable MAU S. 0snkLIP Y. tm Amen. 1 4S90% WA 1 XN135e1n BaNs-ftM1 2004 Fin AW US Bank-CIP Yes 'MAlml®n 1 CS91% 34niffi WA 04W.166 1 2C04 F0a�onp ry 2B%Fn Aak US 8ar1t-COI Yes tyA n 1 4.% 2 WA 2 1 Zd14 FNen So01aN-MUWaI FUM $ 4,164,]]0 S 4,t64,]]0 T W I FMOI Apart I msSmteMs Wand TWI Avenge WWMy V f 70,51 %l f S 961 f1 ]0294A10 IS 236054476 121046 f 46.168 Wq 60 Ms A% 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O w N O O'' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of O O OOOOOOOOa0�00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 000000000000 0 1 M a�tp yy Nt70 O O O O O O O O� V O On G OOOQOOOOOOO O O O O O O O h O b tOV q 6 0000000 �t7-MlONOmi' �� q low v Q —...N..—d.vO C."..v � aO SC6 N N N M IA � � Z QnG�.ON W t+f V 9 � NOOI V NO)atr 2 Z N N N N N � � Y N N N O N N N i. N VO O N N N N N w I n O N N NIA O V N V' m nnnnnnrrrnnn 00000000 0 0 00000000808O rnnnr nr n 00000 0 0 Q N NN��VV NN NN ��``ll��VV ��VV N 1A fa Ol�]1�1f� Il�(]( tg( m Q OOO000S00O0 N�V NN ON (V OON Nfa 9 Q— � ` N C-! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C t+1 aa{{OOOOOOOOe-WI00 — 00000000000 �D 10 O- C 0 0 . . . . . . . . .�p.. . . . O O O O O O O O N V O O . N Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N . . . . . . . . . . . . S S 0 0 0 0 S S O O o wig N . V . M OOOOOOOOM O n N C OOOOOOa oaw w of "'e d N c N C Om`m m LW aN Cs saCg6 �c _rWmm6_m�m6 _rmmm6_yry0m. mm= 888 -mc-mcLLa Omymmm�� C,~~~LLE' w___ww-== -ee"ez�1°maLLa F cEEEC, yy m ~F"�i ai m �oEQ NN In pEp EEEss pEp U VUU UVVVV ai ai U m m m $ m o� O O C � m o ? Z 49 m L o a P a m m Va SS m nE dm omam?c c 0 z c S U o z S m c c '3 13 E m m a m is Ca$ LL?6OQ Nm Nm bmQQ UNmN ON N> O 0N_ W mA iLmCe LL CC C>$32 L a ca Y $ L,iCCmox Ej -cm> -c>m SO f0L---- 2Vmm if cc M SLL0- S zUUZ 0LLc7»»LL33g g� 0 yygg LLLLLL{ LLgy yy yg LLgyb�yLL � g� LL$� y ES ��T¢�Ytl LLEN �a �gS LL 8@� LL b�Q »m p 5 yy�pNp m�i E »6:fs 4$i5� ggy"y Ig-Ru 1l <::d33�$n id �3^gmg $m gry i^k v2 $S Np�yb u� ry xe�'m ng i a»»ga n nrtm �vn�. �$��$�RRM- $ ARMAM OMHM8� 6» mR3ffi» Of say= ^c ast»g�mgg o xeE o S$ 2S grygrymlgg5amffi API BEEP A ,a 7� Pau Pau � »Nv9 m$ 9 UUR4 S: � � j� y{ yyyyyyyyg }k{ yypp g „S„S 33gg pp9 �p FLL l� U99 NpLL g gg :yg �HNN$�5� WyuP pY$gu psi�f Ul`k�5 1p UbUyy 59P NID4IN �OC�e f UNJJIIIS�C« EF FUi/�/Al�J J6f6i ZY- FV4IJJO. VVff 449 mvn r� 9-S§ ra• E LL a N W g O N N C n W n n gg W C g3 b b w A ro Y N Y-yO N O Ay y S O M O W Y A N Nptl N Nm {rye b (pOONyO� N O N p W N O O W O V N H tC O N b m g a •- a '� Y F'� m h00AN w r oyi o m m A $ w A 'pOOI6 p1 «A O N Obl�bm0 mO !� V AqqN m N A O a Q Q yri NN �O bO�tNpb bl� �{1y� pO g n pW LL N yam AOl� th A�Nrob� N W N N 4 W mA imp yy MHIn NO)N ee O pm � �p�p��m O0 CJ Wq q 1qj ,CN WO�p mNmM� p0O ym V r 00 {Wy {y {Wy Otl N bmb�eNry�+ HW AO)OH O p mm W YIQ m Or' A Ol {m{yy N Nov � qW b N N p O V N N m O A! n Q O tl -vi LL r CJ m b N y V A N lV m m N N Oil 8 m k b N r n Anm�v �p n O N a D O H O O O Si :sOt ue vpop nm'd m O O 0 IO N N N b N V A N N b m N pO N m b �-�pOjjO ON W NN N(O(NOO C O 9G H pNj•CJ C4 nt+jg py �Rp y$� A b O A GH N�ao'10 mN��Nfm tl q O FO Y m G 2 iG- W e m ; z f m d m tl J m r G N 8 m T'N 1y5 q W z# a e e �O dtl �,�aaesxmx � _q w d m 'm e m m dl�--tmgOC 010 UOF Z U W Z b Y n O O V N r v N c S a z H 000051 W Ciyd Le Qnla CRY R dbnd OCNa artl . F FUNa CiX,y3l. ^Fend OganY arq FY lV Au1MBY Jway31,2W) Baaradhwa FUMe }20.BNpA Less uN FlFus Len NonSuquz (eM.eW) eae.wd F.. FUMe Q2T Sn BW Aaatat Ns,Ave9ebM 0«M WreVa Yes X4Yw 6uM« Wa4sF - GwcYq S 2]34.=- sms, WWFbOa-SMeeO w IU S.waP R.]11'. - - Pxryvin. Nmwa xo wA 4,014 wxT -pmvM r« Gec NBu NO NMa raa.BaNAmuM. S I.We N1 f NOW 3 - s N.o11 u S T. Mssttr Sep. BUSYIs CUMp]Yn-=e s In levbrrt VM Yet T« Btkd New Talk CetNM Y« VS TnewzT Be SMW 4NSA20 b,Y5,0R0 S.dNev YsM�0. E Yez va TauuyW 46TT.011 Awill1 Bak=TOM.Oemna Y. US.Tnaeuy00 9,616.N] O.N4N] OAWNT Bee alN YwF-OxvA Yee USTn«Vy EO 14,NT,eW 1{A3T,eW 10.60].6B] Belli al New Yak-dmeM Yes US Tn W D aY1 9 0R2 D a22 TOW -UST, NBfl600 e0.p0.600 9]BeBp U 60avmua Spnval Enl p AImIkM 9epw Ssse- CUYWun-AMtill Isslwrt Vxx Yes Ad Yn fisikd Nw Yak-uemvra Yee FM]a Mc ;954209 2BY,MD Z95,260 BeA dNew Yah-W Tn MlB I,OK,N$ f,W9,N2 1,W4NR BM dNex Yak-Celnara Yn FFCB 4.N4N6 e,N9.M6 4.649.605 Bala dNFwYM-OameM Vn F,Yb Mt 4.446.950 4.446,950 4.406.900 BsMdI yak -pxnM Yn FXIB z016.N1 z914N1 )A14601 BeRb Nex YCM-pnuM Yn FNMA 1,994N1 4.994p9 4,MM,@1 Bank.N Yak-BenwM Yn FXL a-OrowY NaM 3MR N2 N6 m TMyU a Go,mreM sewpn 29406304 M400,30I R91N3N M.eum Trm Nel. BmY AFWn CYMWbn-Av.Y6dn vM Yes vn T« Bnkd N«YOM-Cem vale si GamiEWSM 92 zfOd 9252N iolal-Me]um TmnP 29262M 2.026,2N 2.925 XB Rvre CwnmeNY Paper Cudvlun-PvadNie 8u us I —a &U VM SuMu Yea m SMIF Yes FVMd Naw YaltNmaM Yes M.x Gwp ZMAN 2. IN 2.M.124 B dNew Yak CemaM Yee Cesp Fume, Im '975,481 z9M,a01 2.9m45I BVNtd Nn 1. bm. Yale R .&GaeNs 1.WB.6T4 1$46M I.9N.6T4 Bnkd New Yak-I)sm. Y. NexaC w 991.910 W mo 9N.910 BwMd Nn YvkGenzvtl Yee P—Xetaa W0.150 Seem MASS .dN«YM-Gamma Yee iMaF XaMa 1.W46)S 1.N6,6T! 1.90e.6YJ 9 sf.Ys, N. Yae AT6T z053,014 2.963.014 zw.014 M}dFMw rak. GemW rn G«mN Fbdrk CgMtl M718 M710 M715 9mkd Nmx rwF wmeM rez an Sle zW.M zW.M 99TON Tda.fFme ComrwrcWP 1e.MT 527 1e WT T 14NT.6Y] Lxtl 1p,y lmMeenl FUM 9Fdue Sudue Ne«�AYaa11d a Y« LAIF-C9Y DemaM Yezz 61ele Poa �-k� NY- IAIF-ROA-CameM Yea Slxe Rd 1] 38 RC0 136Tfi RM 4T 639.R6 4,1101N 61.]OB 1W 6mdue H..FYe O622)to30 2�� 9340RT S jION 02)Wi eA104f4 &Yldua !b S.pLla Xo gNMa Mua% SufM Yae 1]1]67% 13M11% 6urFk,a Na 61ew. N0 afl.m Nwy% 6upm rn 13106% 1316M @FFwe tb Swqua Na MFUMs Mua % 6uMw Y« e4mox e61Tex sap- Na I IsaPMa Ne aFum Muy% safM• Yaa 21 N80% P:T41X T"G lnvaa6«x. 141 an 11) 12 4nOw a101a - N361W. ee.3NgG TdaI CITY Cat% B mvautnrrts I5: eN 10 eN 1 e110126182015eue NT I 14110AM N) eaNlzx Nnaex Wtldn-Qly lnvWnxtea Am,1vM S.yss d atlM,a.avaiaeee I«n vM r« Ast r« Y- 2N2POAUS, NCIP Yns UST,uuy BG T,NT,@0 ].N).020 T,NT,929 M FDI AmessOy-CIP Y« VAT,vyM 24,N46N N,0146N N,e144N 2D31 Fawo PulMAy �GP Tea USTnav/B1 fi,NB.4N 0.0344N 409B.4Y 2qM FYurce ]w11wX :CIP Yez UST BB 246N TIe N&Mn. 2452a])e TdyUS Tre N.130.fl1 M1 ]N M,1bTB1 Fased—M FUMv irvap-AvaGbl %bnY l M wRM Book Value S"" Y« W9W Yes Gi CeItls U6Bnk-Rgwa YES Itl Mwkal %F NR a03 CMc pnlerUSSenk-OadM YES 1y AmmY 1BN us BVAMM$M YES 1y Attwhat lmS US,BaM-CIP YES Mrr to 10MBMVSEark. JaFW YES 1y MwLat 2W1Fn AUN-IBBSUSBse*-E YES Iy Pmwtat 1%SISAuzB -CIP YES 1MA'tlwlmt - 'MlemUSBaN-WS YES IMMiwYan IMMsUSBaM-Spoa FUM YES 1n Mlwlren - - 1DNflGAUSOmw-GP YEB 1d Mwcm - - 2wiR us Bwi-MiI YES 1x Amaaen 1 1 1 Mi FS AVS BnA-CV YES Itl Artxkan - 2002FDAUSBvat-GEISw YES tdpnwken 1 1 1 2002 PpAV5 BUM-CIP YES lestAnnnen TO1,N) T01,zD] ]01. 2pMTm OPOAUSB Os YES tall Nrwon 1 1 1 MTa[y RMU S BUA-COI YES Itl Mpcan - 2M1Tssa6bFGAU S BWtLIP YES 1d Art,Vun ' 2pMFklMMUSBaM CIP YES 1a Miwtan 3.48SIN SA82.IN 3,4W,te8 RCp Fn OUIM1 USBN COI YES 1y Mrkzn 2 2 2 9Eloly-I; FuM 41N T]0 41 T10 1N.R0 Tdel R" Apse ImtsOnnM1 SMfMa Nn soda. Ne aFw. Aauyx SUFM• Ye. N 6336% 20 )440% gsfyy Np but9M Na NFU. May% 5e93us Yes Li= =j I B)bM I e0II% (1 )D a 1 >6 1a To 16 N1 a1x99x tl t. V Gr T.1 1e1 1I 21 1110123 1 M la 4"M71 14.11SIN)i92] IN. 19Q0000% 11 L� E Sol SM _m =o$ ul uj H-0 owl aoob m &AMOS 0-1 MY! 'Mrs pepra Pee fl� € o E E E m E E E A E E E E' E^ E E E E FL E" s E E F� °�' ' ww wei W,1.Wj W Was?, wws 1A w609 www uiww iO ytl�¢c mLLry .tl 112to �r mmmmw mmmo`QQ` >>>i Boo NZ ��mi@w m C C C G d LL C C C m LL C C C LL C C C LL HUM m ox� �d�Na� da a`�na5 addma5 d`a`d`via� d`d`in a>�a512 w a m r N co 0 TN1 1 L C� D � a w > E � a � o E L E b Z ffi a � c � m o O � 'c E { C � � N N w CY Gy1 = 6 U9 O eD S N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -CO- 0 $ Ci +' O O O O O O uo O? t0 O Ln OD r O ui LO Lo LO \n V Q a 13 L/� a •� o� F LC � y OF1Kf' COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: Receive and File Revenue and Expenditure BUSINESS SESSION:—R Report for January 31, 2007 CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Receive and File the January 31, 2007 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta. Respectfully submitted, John M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment •: 1 . Revenue and Expenditures Report, January 31, 2007 �}05w J CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES -ALL FUNDS 07/01/2006 - 1/3112007 BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED l $33,045,39200 $15,723,22860 4760% 1,855,100,00 20,822.0E 110% x Revenue 855,581.00 670,357 94 78 40 % l Assistance "Lands�pmg890,900 454,74500 0.00 000% orestry 0.00 000 000% OPS) Revenue 102,700 00 100,083 74 97 50 % aw Enforcement 0 00 000 000% Gaming 185,75000 182,90044 9850% gg BLandscapmg 890,90000 457,18963 5130% RCTC 2,374,00700 46,83188 200% Development Funding 000 000 000% Crime Violent Task Force 165,56000 115,08869 6950% AB 939 000 123,28&45 0 00 % Quimby 1,939,90000 1,597,21470 8230% Infrastructure 7,50000 10,402 51 138 70% Village Parking 000 0.00 000% South Coast Air Quality 52,400 00 26,682 07 50 90 % Cmagllstea 0,00 000 000% Transportation 1,390,60000 996,57593 7170% Parks 8 Recreation 446,000 00 252,88000 56 70% Civic Center 256.00000 222,58326 8690% Library Development 177,50000 100,42100 5660% Community Center 75,30000 39,85290 5290% Street Facility 54.30000 38,06229 70.10% Park Facility 13,60000 7,62409 56 to% Fire Protection Facility 74,50000 39,51431 5300% Arts In Public Places 138,100 00 87,332 95 63 20% Interest Allocation 000 1,015,10085 000% Capital Improvement 123,653,00900 14,456,05571 1170% Equipment Replacement 616,50000 564,44164 9160% Information Technology 411,20000 394,81854 96.00% Park Equipment B Facility 373,72200 367,90742 9840% SirverRock Golf 3.427.11000 1,389,27276 4050% SiNerRock Golf 67,426 00 62296 0 90 % LQ Public Safely Officer 2,300.00 2,295 25 99,80% La Quints Financing Authority 6,617,022 00 4,256,262 21 64.30% RDA Protect Area No 1 53,105,204 00 29.613,729 97 55 80 % RDA Protect Area No. 2 41,780,34500 15,909.18713 3810% Total $274 809,273 00 $I I BPB 629 90 32 30 000 2 CITY OF U OUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 0710112006 - 113112007 FUNDS BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET PERCENT General $34289,85100 $13.77550867 $52,77460 $20,461,56773 402% Lbrary 859,27500 11500000 000 754,27500 132% Gas Tax 1,440,41800 668,83859 coo 77157941 464% Federal Assistance 365,92100 000 D00 365.92100 00% Urban Forestry 000 000 000 000 00% Sleet (Cops) Revenue 10140000 8293963 000 18,46037 818% Local Law Enforcement 000 000 000 coo 00% Indian Gaming 201, 14200 57,13761 000 14400439 284% Lighting B Landscaping 890,90000 519,69165 coo 371,20835 583% RCTC 2.37426200 46,83188 000 2327.43012 20% Development Agreement 000 000 000 000 00% CV Violent Crime Task Force 102,70000 27,15102 000 75,54898 264% AB 939 88,18400 49679 10 000 38,50490 563% Quimby 116,66000 129844 000 115,35156 11% Infrastructure 50383200 120,54250 000 368,28950 237% Village Parking (1,89300) 000 000 (1,89300) 00% South Coast Art Quality 26,60000 10,36368 000 1623632 390% Cmagnstea 0DO 000 000 000 00% Transportation 660060300 974,89024 000 5,625,71276 148% Parks B Recreation 125,22600 55,969% 000 69,25604 447% Cwic Center 12,101,75800 1,003,84473 000 11097,91327 83% Library Development 000 52.39803 000 (52,39803) 00% Community Center 000 000 000 000 00% Street Facility 75,00000 1,03500 000 73,96500 14% Park Facility 000 000 000 000 00% Fire Protection 0DO 24.20468 000 (24,20458) 00% Arts In Public Places 655.95000 76,32736 000 580,62264 116% Interest Allocation 000 000 000 000 00% Capital Improvement 123653,00900 14,456,05571 44,28979 109.152,66350 117% Equipment Replacement 1255,90800 136,43214 26,09871 1.09337715 109% Information Technology 681,80000 144,67811 000 537,12189 212% Park Maintenance Facility 000 000 000 000 00% SdveiRcck Gott 4,224,72800 2,202,30372 Do 2.02242428 521% SilverRock Reserve 37,21100 37,21100 000 000 1000% Lq Public Safety Qfoer 2,00000 000 000 2,00000 00% La Quinta Financing Authority 6,(17,14600 4,265.55045 000 2.35059555 645% RDA Project Area 1 74,60615200 26 874,027 58 000 47,732,13442 360% RDA Project Area Nat 87,595,13000 14,776,56274 000 72,818,56726 169% TNaI$359, ,873,00 $80.557,4742 6310 ii t21dvzb,zJ*bd224% 3 CITY OF LA OUINTA 07/01/2006-113112007 GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL REMAINING BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED TAXES: Property Tax 1,417,60000 886,21227 531,38773 62.510% NO Low Property Tax Distribution 1,733,50000 1,233,30988 500,19012 71150% Sales Tax 6,484,125.00 3,319,26705 3,164,85795 51.190% Sales Tax Reimbursement 2,16137500 1,143,81044 1,017,56456 52920% Document Transfer Tax 1,017,20000 401,55615 615,64385 39480% Transient Occupancy Tax 4,520,00000 1, 768,82259 2,751.17741 39130% Transient Occupancy Tax - Mdigatiol 299,05000 (33.398.23) 332,44823 -11170% Franchise Tax 946 700 00 235 214 08 711,48592 24 850 TOTAL TAXES 18,519,550 00 8,954,794 23 9,624,755 77 48100% LICENSE & PERMITS: 252,30000 167.175.40 85,12460 66260% Business License 17,000.00 10,587.50 6,41250 62280% Animal License 558,60000 449,7292B 108,87072 80510% Building Permits 84,40000 70.32825 14.07175 83330% Plumbing Permits 47,60000 41,05270 6,547.30 86250% Mechanical Permits 65,50000 6429169 1,208.31 98160% Electncal Permits Garage Sale Permits 10,60000 7,97000 2,63000 75190% Misc Permits 9110000 989,5686 (786686) 108640% TOTAL LICENSES& PERMITS 1.127,10000 910,10168 216,99832 80750b FEES: Sale of Maps BPublicatlons 5,50000 2,21130 3,28870 40210% Community Services Fees 398,70000 283,662.18 115,03782 71150% Finance 2.00000 0.00 2,00000 0 000 % Bldg & Safety Fees 377,200 00 404,408 80 (27,208 BO) 107 210 % Community Development Fees 222,400.00 103,32500 119,07500 46.460% Public Works Fees 359 400 00 859 315 45 (499,91545) 239 100% TOTALFEES 1,365,20000 1,652,92273 (287,72273) 121080% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,91690000 1,670.25503 1,246,64497 57260% Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines 143.800 00 29,391 59 114,408.41 20 440% Parking Violations 25,700 00 34,508 29 (8,80B 29) 134 270% Misc Fines 137,00000 72,18203 64S1797 52690% AB939 000 000 0.00 0 000% Federal Govt Grants 0.00 000 000 0,000% County of Riverside Grant 000 000 000 0000% State of California Grant 8.60000 14,882.84 (6,282 84) 173.060 % Fire Services Credit 4,214,40000 (16,68808) 4.231.08808 -0.400% CSA152 Assessment 202 400 00 000 202 400 00 0000% TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 7.648,80000 1.804,53170 5,844,26830 23590% INTEREST 3,987,30000 2,245,90824 1,741,39176 56330% MISCELLANEOUS 4,90000 13,328 10 (8,428 10) 272 000% Miscellaneous Revenue 000 1,52616 (1,52616) 0000% Assmnt Dist Surplus 000 000 000 0000% Other Mitigation Measures 000 000 000 0000% Litigation settlement 000 3852 (3852) 0000% Cash Overl(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 4,90000 14,89278 (9,99278) 303930% 332,54202 140,077.24 19246476 42120% TRANSFERIN TOTAL GENERAL FUND 33,045,%2.00 15,723,22860 17,322,16340 47580% 0 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT 0710112006.113112007 REMAINING BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 866,250W 411,58461 D00 454,66539 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 1, 170,M900 644,%668 000 525,5,1232 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1652OIC 00 875,67811 000 776.32189 PERSONNELIRISK MGT 1,046,SSd 00 544,O7d 82 000 502,47918 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 4,735,61300 2.4]6,30422 600 2,259.308 ]8 CITY CLERK 60170400 334,90996 000 2W 79404 TOTAL CITY CLERK 601, 70400 334,90996 000 256, 79404 COMMUNITY SERVICES PARKS& RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 1,1W,20700 624, 16047 50025 541,54628 SENIOR CENTER 391,311 W 194.44527 000 19Q86573 PARKS& RECREA PION PROGRAMS 173,97600 12407017 271 D0 4963483 LIBRARY 869,27500 292,80298 000 576,47202 PARK MAINTENANCE 1,211 )8500 868,148 ]3 000 343,63627 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 3,812,55400 210362762 77125 1708,15513 FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 880,452W 49764671 000 382,80529 CENTRAL SERVICES 398,31700 277,2506] 000 12106633 TOTAL FINANCE 127676960 7I4,89731 000 503,67162 BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING BSAFETY -ADMIN 000 BUILDING 017,03600 1912,72100 74065342 000 27173767 638258 CODECOMPLIANCECONTROL 49287260 000 419,84840 419,84840 ANIMAL CONTROL 421,85000 421,85000 19094372 190,94381 000 CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1, 099.18800 ]52,81381 000 346,37419 346,37419 TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 3,832,04700 238679]88 000 1445,24912 PUBLIC SAFETY: POLICE SERVICES 9,455,117 2,30749942 124 7,152,37293 FIRE 421437300 59.56d 77 000 000 4,154,80823 EMERGENCY SERVICES - 183,73000 4],50066 103024 135,19910 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 13,853,22000 2,4U8,56485 2,27489 11442,38026 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -ADMIN 1462,127W 502,98654 000 959,14046 CURRENT PLANNING 973,66400 316,"163 000 656,99217 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2,435,79150 819, 5 N 000 1616, 13263 PUBLIC WORKS: (389,171 00) PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 633,10300 255,69248 5,500W 37191052 DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 1, 109,51200 517,71548 4,17000 587,62652 MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 2,342,69400 872,03586 3873310 1431,925 D4 MAINT/OPERATIONS- LTGILANDSCAPING 1,976,37600 1,02422901 000 952,14699 MAINT/OPERATIONS- TRAFFIC 375,10200 116,97017 000 258,13183 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 984,28200 65003887 1,32536 332,91777 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 7,421,W900 3,43668187 49p2846 3,545,48]87 TRANSFERS OUT 1.503,459W 983.45322 OW 520.00578 GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (5,184 37500) (19493W 70) 000 (3.234 988 30) NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 34,289,85100 13,775,50867 52,77460 20,461,56773 000,053 5 CITY OF LA OUINTA REMAINING % ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED LIBRARY: County of Riverside 1,874,30000 000 7,814,30000 OOo0% 000 000 000 0000% Contributions 4080000 20822 OB 1997792 51030°% Interest TOTAL LIBRARY 1,855,10006 20,82208 1,834,27792 1'120% GAS TAX REVENUE: 224,400 00 137,952 02 86,447 98 61 480 Section 2105 156,10000 96.36448 61,73552 60.950% Section 2106 299,100 00 187.32626 111,77374 62 630% Section 2107 6,200 00 6,00000 20000 96 770 % Section 2107 5 Traffic Congestion Relief 159, B8100 233,68074 (73,79974) 146160% 7,90000 9 034 44(1 134 44) 114 360% Interest TOTAL GAS TAX 855,581 00 670,357 94 185,223.06 78 350% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: 454,745 00 000 45474500 0000% CDBG Grant 000 000 000 0000% Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 454,74500 000 654, 74500 0000% URBAN FORESTRY 000 000 000 0000% Grant Revenue 000 000 000 0.000% Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY 000 000 0.00 000096 SLESF(COPS)REVENUE: 10000000 100.00000 00% 13 SLESF(Cops) Funding 2,700 00 83 74 2 61626 26 3 100 Interest TOTAL SLESF(COPS) 102,70000 10 008374 2,61626 97450% LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: 0.00 0000% LLEBG Funding 000 0,00 000 000 000 0.000% Interest 000 000 000 0000% Transfer m 000 000 coo 0.000% TOTAL LLEBG INDIAN GAMING 177,25000 177,25000 0.00 100000% Grant revenue 8, 50000 1,65044 284956 66480% Interest TOTAL INDIAN GAMING 185,750.00 782,90044 2,84958 98470% LIGHTING 6 LANDSCAPING REVENUE: 890,90000 457,18963 433,71037 51320% Assessment 000 000 0.00 0000% Developer 000 000 000 0000% Interest TOTAL LIGHTING B LANDSCAPIN 890,90 000 457,18963 433,71037 51320% RCTC RCTC Funding 2,374,00700 46.83188 2,327,17512 1970% Transfer in 000 0 9D 0 00 91000% 2,374,00700 46.83188,17512 1970°° TOTAL RCTC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FUND 000 0000% Mitigation Measures 000 coo 000 000 0000% Interest 000 0.00 0.00 000 0 000 % Transfer m 000 000 0.00 0000% TOTAL DEV AGREEMENT CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE 70,00000 100,36976 (30,36976) 143 390% Member Contributions - Carryover 87,96000 10.54874 77,41126 11990% Grant revenue -JAIB 6,00000 3,19107 2,80893 53180% CLET Line 1,60000 97912 62088 61200% Interest TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FO 165,560 00 115,088 69 50,471 31 69 510% AS 939 REVENUE: 0.00 99,205 23 (99,205 23) 0000% AS 939 Fees 000 24 0" 22 (24 081 22) 0000% Interest 000 123,28645 (123,28645) 0000/ TOTAL OUIMBY OUIMBY REVENUE: 1,667,000 00 1,426, 00P 98 240,997 02 85 540% Quimby Fees 272900 00 171 211 72 Interest TOTAL OUIMBY 1,939,90000 1,597,21470 342,688 30 82 330% INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: 000 000 0.000% U9Irty, refund 000 7,50000 10.40251 (2,90251) 13B 700% Interest 000 000 000 0000% Transfer in TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 7,50000 10,40251 (2,90251) 138700% VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: 000 0.000% Interest 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 0000% TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING 51 REMAINING % CITY OF LA OUINTA BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: 45,000.00 23,03040 21,96960 51180% SCA.D Contribution 000 000 000 0.000% MSRC Funding 000 000 000 0000% Street Svreeping Grant 7,40000 3 651 67 3,74833 49 350% Interest TOTAL SCAQ 52 600 00 28,682.07 25,717 93 50.920% CMAQIISTEA 000 000 000 0.000% CTEA Grant 000 000 000 0000% Interest 000 000 000 0000% TOTAL CMAQIISTEA TRANSPORTATION 1,096,20000 861,68904 234.53096 78610% Developer fees 294.400 00 134,906 89 159,493 11 45 820 % Interest 000 0.00 000 0 000 % Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 1,390,6010, 996,57593 394.02407 71670% PARKS & RECREATION 446,00000 252,880.00 193,12000 56700% Developer fees 000 0.00 000 0000% Interest 000 000 0.00 0000% Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 446,000 00 252,880 00 193,120 00 56 700% CIVIC CENTER 256,000 00 3 10 76.09690 70270% Developer tees 000 42,0 016 42,68 (42,680.00 0000% Interest 0 00 0 00 Transferin TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 25600000 222,58326 6 74 33,41674 6110 86.950% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 177,500 00 100.421 00 77.079 00 56 580% Developer fees 000 000 0.00 0 000 % Interest 000 0.00 000 0000% Transfer In TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 177,50000 100,421.00 77.07900 56580% COMMUNITY CENTER 37,00000 20,574,00 16, 02600 55610% Developer fees 79021.10 50340% Interest 38,300 00 19 278 90 TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER (5,30000 39,85290 35,44710 52930^/< STREET FACILITY Developer fees 44,700.00 3289828 1430172 72930% Interest 10 300 00 589828 28 4 301 72 57.830 TOTAL STREET FACILITY 54,300.00 38,062 29 16,237 71 70 100% PARK FACILITY 11,00000 6,228.00 4,77400 53770% Developer fees 200 00 1,398 09 141 91 5770% Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY 13 600 00 7 624 09 5,975.91 56 O60% FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY 74,50000 39,514.31 34,98569 53040% Developer fees 000 000 000 0.000% Interest TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FACILI 7450000 39,51431 34,98569 53040% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: 97.50000 67,291 83 30,20817 69 020% Arts in Public Places 000 000 000 0000% Arts in Public Places Credits Applied 20 041 12 20,558 88 49 360 % Interest TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 40 600 00 138100.00 87,33295 50,76705 63240% INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest 000 1.015,10085 (1,015, 10085) 0000% Transfer In 000 000 000 0000% TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION 000 1A 0085 (101510085) 0000% 7 CITY OF LA OUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG CVWD County of Riverside Surface Transportation Funding City of Indio DSUSD SB300 Funding RCTC SB821-Bli Path Grant Slate of California APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Litigation Settlements Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE 15,851 492 00 1,719,136 79 14,132,355 21 10 850% 848,479 00 000 848,479 00 0000% 000 000 000 0000% 1.67443000 203,06700 1,471,36300 12130% 2,625,94200 79,39000 2,546,55200 3020% 82,656 00 79,390 00 3,26600 96 050 % 000 000 000 0000% 000 000 0.00 0.000% 25,09900 000 25,009900 25,598 00 45,748 00 00) ( 1 8000% 000 0 00 0 0 000 566,21500 16,45034 549,7 000 000 066 0910% 101,95309800 12,312873. 58 89 640,224 42 12080% 123 653 009 00 14,456,055 71 109,196 953.29 116 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND gg7,00000 486,998.00 100 100.000% Equipment Charges 000 000 0.00 0000% Capital Co 000 12,400.00 (12.400 00) 0000% Fixed Assetiont Asset Saleofce 000 000 000 Re Insurance Recoveries 129,50000 6504264 64,457 36 50 230% Interest 000 000 00 000 0000% Transfers In TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEME 61650000 564,44164 52,05836 91560% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: 373,50000 373,50000 000 100000% Charges for services 000 000 000 0.000% 000 000 000 0000% Sale of FixedAContribsetion Sale Of Fixed Asset 37,70000 21,31854 16,381.46 56550% Interest 0.00 000 000 0 000 % Transfers In TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOL( 411 20000 3]9 , 8 54 16,381 46 96 020% PARK EQUIPMENT & FACILITY 350,72200 350,72200 000 100000% Charges for services 23,00000 17,18542 5,81 Interest 000 000 0 00 000 0000% 0 000% Capital Contributions TOTAL PARK EQUIPMENT & FAC 373,722 00 367,907 42 5,814 58 98 440 SILVERROCK GOLF 2,985.87000 1,179,05588 1,806,81412 39490% Green fees 62,18100 26,19000 35.99100 42120% Range fees 30.600.00 23,195 00 7,40500 75 800% Resident Card 311,24800 123,62088 187,62712 39720% Merchandise 000 000 000 0 000 % Food & Beverage 000 000 000 0000% Allocaled Interest Income 37 210 00 37,211 00 0 00 100 000 Transfers In TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF 3,427,17000 1,389,27276 2,03783724 40540% SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 000 622.96 (62296) 0000% Interest 6749600 000 6742600 0000% Transfers In TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF 67,42600 62298 6Q803.04 0920% LO PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND 200000 2,00000 000 100000% Transfer In . 30000 296.25 4.75 420 98420% Interest TOTAL LO PUBLIC SAFETY 230000 2,29525 4 75 99 % 0ooIIc 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07101120N-1131/2007 REMAINING OTHER CITY FUNDS EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET LIBRARY FUND 000 000 000 000 PROJECT EXPENDITURES REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 669,27500 115,00000 000 754275W TRANSFER OUT TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 869, 0 000 115,00 0D0 00 000 5427 GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 855,58100 499,08895 000 356,49205 TRANSFER OUT 55,183700 169,74964 000 41508736 TOTAL GAS TAX FUND 1,440,41 00 fi68.8 0 ]1,5 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 365,92100 000 000 365.92100 URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY GRANT 000 000 000 000 SLESF(COPS) TRANSFER OUT TOTAL SLESF(COPS) FUND 10140000 82,93963 000 18,46037 LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT TOTAL LLEBG FUND 000 000 000 000 INDIAN GAMING FUND 201,14200 57,13761 000 144,00439 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 01, 142 13]61 000 144,0043 LIGHTING S LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: 890,90000 519,69165 000 371,20835 REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 000 000 000 000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 0,90000 01969165 Q 00 O83 RCTC TRANSFER OUT 2,37426200 d883188 000 2,32],43012 TOTAL RCTC ,3 ,2620 4 3 88 000 2, 43012 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FUND 000 000 000 CONSTRUCTION 000 000 000 000 000 REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 000 000 000 000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL DEV AGREEMENT FUND 000 00 000 CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE 102,70000 27,15102 000 75,54898 OPERATING EXPENSES 000 000 000 000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE 102,7 7,1510 000 5,5489 AB 939 OPERATING EXPENSES 79.43000 49,67910 000 29,]5090 TRANSFER OUT 8,75400 000 000 ----ozo 875400 TOTAL AS 939 68, 184 496791 504 QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT 116,65000 1,29844 000 115.35156 INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 52,10000 52,10000 000 000 CONSTRUCTION 000 000 000 000 REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 458,]3200 68,44250 000 388211 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 8, 320 120, 4250 0 38 950 VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING FUND (1893 DO) 0OD 000 (1,89300) SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 26,60000 10,36368 000 16,23632 PROJECT EXPENDITURES 000 000 000 000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 6,600 03 0, 6368 00 6,236 CMAQIISTEA TRANSFER OUT TOTAL CMAQASTEA FUND 000 000 000 000 TRANSPORTATION 000 000 000 D00 PROGRAM COSTS 000 000 000 000 CONTRIBUTION TRANSFER OUT 6600,60300 974,890211 000 5.62571276 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 6, 66, 9 4, 024 6 12 ]6 PARKS S RECREATION 000 55,96996 000 (55,96996) INTEREST ON ADVANCE 125,22600 000 000 125,22600 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL PARKS 3 RECREATION 125,226 96996 00 25604 CIVIC CENTER 000 000 000 00D PROGRAM COSTS REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 203,66000 118,80165 000 84,85835 TRANSFER OUT 11698,09800 885,04308 000 11,013,05d 92 TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 12,1 1,7580 1, ,844 000 1 69 9 ] LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 1 PROGRAM COSTS 000 000 000 O DO INTEREST ON ADVANCE 000 52,39803 000 (52.39803) TRANSFER OUT 000 000 000 0 000 03) TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 3 8 03 ( CITY OF LA QUINTA 0710112006-11311200] REMAINING OTHER CITY FUNDS EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET COMMUNITY CENTER 000 000 000000 PROGRAM COSTS O W O W 000 000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 000 00 STREET FACILITY OW 000 000 000 PROGRAM COSTS P 75,W000 1,035W 000 73,965W TRANSFER OUT TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0000 1. 3500 0 500 PARK FACIUTY 000 000 000 000 PROGRAM COSTS 000 OX 000 OX TRANSFER OUT 0 0 TOTAL PARK FACILITY FIRE PROTECTION 0X 24,20468 000 (24,20468) INTEREST ON ADVANCE 0 W 0 W 000 0 W TRANSFER OUT TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION DIF 2420468 0 (24, 68) ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 30,00000 2091393 000 908607 MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 180000 000 000 1,8W 00 OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 425.150X 5541343 000 W9,73657 ART PURCHASES 200,OW 00 000 000 2W,0000O TRANSFER OUT TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 05000 8736 000 550 622 fi4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 122.286,25000 14 341,532 26 44,28979 107,900,42795 PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,366.759X 114,52345 000 1,252,23555 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 000 000 OW 12 653, 0 4d56,O 1 4 289 109,1 350 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 598,90600 136,43214 2609871 436,37715 OPERATING EXPENSES 657,X000 OW 000 657,W000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1.2 .908 W 1 6,432 141, 93.377 1 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 68180000 11 7811 000 537, 12189 TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND 69180000 144,6 0 37. PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY 000 OX 000 OW OPERATING EXPENSES o00 000 000 000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE FAC 00 000 000 SILVERROCK GOLF OPERATING EXPENSES 4.157.302W 2,202,30372 000 1,954.99828 TRANSFER OUT 6I,426 W 0 00 0 W e] 426 00 TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF 4,2 , 28W 2,2 2, 0372 2� 4242 SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 3]21100 37,21100 000 000 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 37,21 3,211 000 0 LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS TOTAL LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY 2,00000 000 OX 2,XO 00 10 U OF COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Approval of City Council Goals RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the City Council goals for fiscal year 2007-2008. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: No direct fiscal implications will result from this action. Staff proposes to develop programs to implement selected goals and will identify cost projections as part of the Economic Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and budget process. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Council conducted a study session on February 20, 2007 to discuss its goals for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. The minutes from that study session are included as Attachment 1. Staff has updated the list of City Council Goals , including both new and those yet to be completed or implemented, and has grouped them by the following categories: Public Safety, Traffic and Roads, Capital Improvement Projects, SilverRock Resort, Sphere of Influence Area, and Other (Attachment 2). Each goal has been listed under applicable categories, which include: • Economic Development Plan; • Capital Improvement Program; 0())0(3 ) • Budget; and • Other/Comments Additionally, each goal that could be attributed to one of the components of the Strategic Planning Process (i.e., Economic Development Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and Annual Budget) has been incorporated into those documents for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. It should be noted that the draft Economic Development Plan and Capital Improvement Program will both be reviewed by the Council on March 20, 2007, and the Marketing Plan will come before Council on April 17, 2007. i�L`l11>•L�3_L` l �7_1 y � �.I �� I_`l Pl ��l The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the City Council goals for fiscal year 2007-2008; or 2. Do not approve the City Council goals for fiscal year 2007-2008; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Minutes of February 20, 2007 City Council meeting 2. City Council Goals for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Minutes 8 February 20, 2007 MOTION — It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Sniff to participate in the Charity Golf Tournament at the Classic Club at the $2,500 level with the money to be used for scholarships for La Quinta students. Council Member Henderson indicated she would not support the motion because this is outside of the City's grant process, and only one of many golf tournaments the City will be asked to participate in. Motion carried 4-1, Council Member Henderson dissenting. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND THE FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 ANNUAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REVIEW. City Manager Genovese presented the staff report. Council Member Kirk questioned the intent of the last bullet item on Page 13 regarding Redevelopment General Fund Loan Principle and Interest Payments. City Manager Genovese explained this item is listed to continue the Redevelopment payments of loans. Mayor Adolph stated there are 37 goals and a number of them have been completed and congratulated staff for the completion of goals; and encouraged staff to continue to strive in completing the remaining goals. Council Member Kirk suggested staff be more aggressive on energy conservation for development; explore the feasibility of placing utilities underground; and analyze the DIF transportation fee and whether there is a need to join the TUFF program. Council Member Henderson suggested a dedicated staff member be assigned to interface with citizens to emphasized and improve communications with citizens. Council Member Sniff suggested to look at public safety issues and the number of police officers; increase the general fund to carry without any income for a year; and review the relationships with Riverside County pertaining to service. Council Member Osborne stated he has doubts of accuracy relating to the five-year general fund balance; suggested to continue to increase emergency fund balances; and stated he is not in favor with a citywide park user fees. City Council Minutes 9 February 20, 2007 Council Member Osborne suggested the City obtain control of Hwy 111 from Caltrans and/or improve relationship. 2. DISCUSSION OF GOLF CART PLAN REVISED AREA, STAGE 1, PHASE 1 FOR THE VILLAGE AND SURROUNDING AREAS. Community Development Director Evans presented staff report Community Development Director Evans stated the program must be revisited with Council if desired to establish golf cart paths north of Hwy 111 as many improvements will be needed in response to Council Member Osborne. Council Member Sniff stated it may be useful to conduct a survey of how many golf carts will utilize the paths and how many residents have a golf cart. Council Member Henderson questioned what will be at the end of the path at Eisenhower. Community Development Director Evans explained the accesses to the path and potential community uses. Community Development Director Evans stated the multi -purpose trails around SilverRock Resort will be utilized in the Golf Cart Plan and the City may need to retrofit certain areas for dust control; confirmed there will be a charging station in Old Town La Quinta and staff is reviewing technology on the need to relocate the station with development in response to Council Member Kirk. In response to Mayor Adolph, Community Development Director Evans stated a City staff member will be assigned to file registrations with the DMV; and explained the next step is to finalize the ordinance and present to Council at a public hearing REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS CVAG Transportation Committee — Council Member Kirk reported the Committee approved a reimbursement to the City of Indio for Madison Street improvements. ci TTA HMEN C G 'O V C W 07 d G1 i+ c O N N C y W N GI O C « C a�HC W O (a C O 7 O >. � CtE C � ci E ci r WO co> co c yd E}W> O N 7 Od as+ C' 0 'm G a w O mH � LL �o �> O d W Q fd =C o'W >WO c°a010ro-a 'CLC 3 Q o aE G o Qc2 w tm N C OM •C C y W O � d .o V a +, c W a v Ur9 CL £ _¢ •3 d � 3 0 0a : W N G c o Y 3 ° i+ e o ti C N y o Ir. Q L £ Q « p� W O p ti ° Ea 2 x o�m=dc C7 a° u aC v W o cn �` E W H O c N co > c> W « o C O W ur N d o N d Q r 3 L CIm z •O Ellin ~ Of C zu C mrnxaE a e- N ei Ili I ui r2 w " o �o E 3 p rnd o« ° a e c�.. m c m m e Y- c E c� c � Y o dl (a ° ° a m W d y `o Q 3« c c m c E a y w O po m m c - > o m.m «c y d E o i am V C E O E O p Rf Cpi y m m W cL +�+ Cr 0 0p0 p I°m C y C WiCO -t m y y Q p p y C Ly £ > C O «L CVw m ++ m In m amn m m m30 z = m 'OwMn m p C1wm m U aOva 0 'm C Cl. Co CO C 01 � � t m = N .y U � C Ta E m dw v o 3Q m w api cES £ o OM ° ea'$ ao m�c> d o va O o m c � cca a cc r C O G1 E E 0 m a 0 > W y 0 a « W N '.m-, � o ; y m = w c U. Y w W p Y C7 Im a F 0a = a C Q4 > °' Z 'CO C O. > y G > 'O J a V V Q O 0D n O 0) �- N m C C }yd 7 �+ N Y �•• }. E c°� a `° `° '° c N N o c _ m e c c d o 00 0 m U U U e o c o s.2 t m C w C 3 3 3 c m M d N Q c d O 3 U DC O. ayi w CL C1N TN 01N 0 tm C Of C •c C CM C C C ti c 'D N 4) d 9. (D L N 'C N L Ci L Gi C N L G) L � Im .N N •y N .N Cm N .NCm m c0 c) .0 C) .0 c� m v c m a>� oa v a E c E E wo ma C C C W C W W p C t C c :Ew d 3 v 3 v 3 G e _ y N CL tm O Y W 10 t E E rn E 0 Ca W W 41 X m N N W C N C N Cc IM~ o W o o C�1 c f0 >. �` d Z y N a` O C d r T m S C r O � G U. 0 O W 41 N w W C O C W o o L)E„ 30Wdt3r W y Y C N d d H O N O 01 O aC >> c` `• W v d C K O a 0 G h c i o f/i Q 5 3 cc m W ci O OC O h ui ui ao Cr) 000O7I H C CD E a m C U N N C (D a y O > > C d cc O N CA .0 7 m a.Y C G1 +0 E C Q > M oa v a E r c E C W D C Cp da c w m o._ V 3 d W C v t6 �3J2 � ca o �d C7mWa= w a> W N d off � } W fA C N N _ > C a C1 0no ci Q � N Yw• T ON Twit 4 4 a" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting Conditional Approval of a Final Map for Parcel Map No. 34959, Jeffrey R. Dunham AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: 5 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map for Parcel Map No. 34959, Jeffrey R. Dunham FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Parcel Map No. 34959 is generally located south of Avenue 52 and west of Madison Street (Attachment 1). This residential development will consist of 2 parcel lots; on approximately 0.87 acres (Attachment 2). On September 29, 2006, at a Directors Hearing, the Community Development Director approved Tentative Parcel Map 34959. The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map (Attachment 2) which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. The Final Map is technically complete and is being routed for signatures. The developer expects that all signatures will be in place within the time allowed for its conditional approval. w3 As a result, City staff has prepared the attached resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map. The approval is contingent upon receipt within 30 days (April 19, 2007), of a technically correct Final Map, suitable for recording by the County Recorder, with all required signatures (except the City Clerk). Once the map is received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. If the required item is not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map for Parcel Map No. 34959, Jeffrey R. Dunham; or 2 Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map for Parcel Map No. 34959, Jeffrey R. Dunham; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, i )' xk-�� ;4K Tim by R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Final Map w a RESOLUTION NO. 2007-(Clerk's Office will enter) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP NO. 34959, JEFFREY R. DUNHAM, A MARRIED MAN, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps; and WHEREAS, the City Council, as a matter of policy, allows a subdivider to have City staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to City staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including City staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of City staff; and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional City staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional City staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Resolution No. 2007- Jeffrey Dunham, PM 34959 Adopted: March 20, 2007 Page 2 of 3 Section 1. The final approved provided the before April 19, 2007. map for Parcel Map 34959 is conditionally subdivider submits all required items on or Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms to the tentative parcel map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. A. Finalize the Final Parcel Map and obtain all necessary signatures. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on April 19, 2007. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval w t~ Resolution No. 2007- Jeffrey Dunham, PM 34959 Adopted: March 20, 2007 Page 3 of 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 201h day of March, 2007, by the following vote to wit: AYES:Council Members (Clerk's Office will enter) NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT I I ill 0 Z: O AVE 52nd LA QUNTA 54th SITE AIRPORT AVE VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ATTACHMENT 2 as all b< •� b MINIfiv b 33 c 6 I b ib I b too s l~8 3�@ 3 �I �; � b Ell yat i R I b o ,." b R b b� b � . fix b� ;��NilY � 1IL� n ¢g nil If R bs� 4 jigs, z 1$ ��as a Jig I I Xj b 8 SIR jig oil7� d Zall all ib€ € 1b a !!-do a o i a r fall I F'H OF T13F'O COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLt: Approval of a Reimbursement Agreement with Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation, for Raised Landscape Median Improvements on Fred Waring Drive RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Authorize the City Manager to execute a Reimbursement Agreement (Attachment 1) between the City of La Quinta and Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California corporation, for raised landscape median improvements to Fred Waring Drive. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Attachment 1 is a reimbursement agreement with Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California corporation, for Development Impact Fee (DIF) eligible improvements to Fred Waring Drive associated with the Esplanade development, Tract No. 29323. As funds are collected in the future, and as the project is budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), an amount not to exceed $586,670 will be paid from the City's Transportation DIF funds, Account No. 250-000-290.00-00. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. is the subdivider and developer of property in the City subject to the provisions of Tract No. 29323, which is currently known as Esplanade and lies north of Fred Waring Drive between Jefferson Street and Port Maria Road. (Attachment 2) Conditions of Approval for Amended Tract Map No. 29323 conditioned the developer to construct full landscaped median improvements (Attachment 3) to the portion of V(� ,TiC, �.l:l J Fred Waring Drive from Jefferson Street to the westerly boundary (Port Maria Road). Pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-47 and the June 2005 DIF Study, Detailed Cost Estimate (Attachment 4), these improvements are eligible for DIF fund reimbursement. Pursuant to the DIF, adopted June 15, 1999 and revised June 7, 2005, which was in effect at the time of construction, the developer was required to pay development impact fees to fund these and other improvements as the development was constructed. Said fees include a Transportation Improvement Fee component that funds transportation improvements that serve the region. Pursuant to Section 10, Implementation, B. "Administration of the Program," if the City requires a developer, as a condition of project approval, to construct facilities or improvements for which impact fees have been, or will be, charged to that project, the impact fee imposed on that development project for that type of facility should be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of those facilities or improvements. Staff has determined that the reimbursement amount is valid and within the amount established as DIF eligible off -site improvements. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Reimbursement Agreement between the City of La Quinta and Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation, for raised landscape median improvements to Fred Waring Drive; or 2) Do not authorize the City Manager to execute a Reimbursement Agreement between the City of La Quinta and Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, for raised landscape median improvements to Fred Waring Drive; or 3) Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4othy on son, P.E. Public Works D ector/City Engineer Approved for submission by: JzC.�✓i Est Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Reimbursement Agreement 2. Vicinity Map 3. Conditions of Approval, Tract 29323 4. June 2005 DIF Study, Detailed Cost Estimate ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ESPLANADE - TRACT NO. 29323-1 RAISED LANDSCAPE MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO FRED WARING DRIVE (JEFFERSON STREET TO PORT MARIA ROAD) THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2006, by and between Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the City of La Quinta, California, a California Municipal Corporation (the "City"). RECITALS: A. Developer is the subdivider and developer of property in the City of La Quinta subject to the provisions of Tract Map No. 29323-1 (the "Tract"), which area is currently known as the Esplanade and which lies north of Fred Waring Drive between Jefferson Street and Port Maria Road in the City of La Quinta. B. Conditions of Approval for Amendment No. 2 of Tract Map No. 29323 (attached to the Plan as Exhibit B) obligate Developer to construct the full landscaped median improvements to the portion of Fred Waring Drive lying adjacent to the tract (the "Required Improvements"). C. Pursuant to the City Development Impact Fee Program ("Program"), adopted June 15, 1999 and revised June 7, 2005, the Developer was required to pay Development Impact Fees ("Fees) to fund these and other improvements as the Development was constructed. Said Fees include a Transportation Improvement Fee component ("Transportation Fee") that funds regional serving transportation improvements. D. Pursuant to Section 10, Implementation, B. Administration, of the Program, if the City requires a developer, as a condition of project approval, to construct facilities or improvements for which impact fees have been, or will be, charged to that project, the impact fee imposed on that development project for that type of facility should be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of those facilities or improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Responsibilities of Developer. Developer has constructed the Required Improvements defined in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and has borne the cost thereof even if the actual costs of constructing the Required Improvements exceeds the Budget Amount. Developer has submitted invoices and supporting documentation for those eligible costs per Exhibit A. A Page 1 of 6 2. Responsibilities of City. Upon execution of the DIF Reimbursement Agreement and acceptance of the Required Improvements defined in Exhibit A by the City, the City Engineer shall either approve or disapprove the invoices or portions thereof and submit the approved invoices for payment through the City's Demand Register. The City Engineer shall provide to Developer a written explanation for any portion of an invoice that is disapproved. 3. Amount of Reimbursement. Reimbursement shall be for actual costs incurred by Developer for items eligible for reimbursement and for any additional items required in the course of construction of the Required Improvements and agreed to in writing by the parties hereto. The Developer shall not be reimbursed beyond the Budget Amount. 4. Warranty. For a period of one year following completion of the Required Improvements and their acceptance by the City, which acceptance shall not be subject to completion of all improvements for the Tract, Developer agrees to obtain from the contractor(s) constructing the Required Improvements a warranty in the City's favor for the repair or replacement of faulty work or materials. 5. Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising. under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations incurred herein so long as the injuring party commences to cure such injuring action within ten (ten) days of service of such notice and completes the cure within forty-five (45) days after the notification, or such longer period as may be agreed upon by both parties to this Agreement. 6. Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, including the filing of a lien or other legal action to compel payment of the Reimbursement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and legal costs from the losing party. 7. Indemnification. Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, representatives and agents ("Indemnified Parties"), from and against those actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of any liability or claim for liability, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including property owned by City) and for errors and omissions committed by Developer, its officers, employees representatives, and agents, which arise out of acts or activities of Developer's or Developer's Officers, employees, agents or representatives ("Claims"), whether or not such act or activity is authorized by this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own negligence or that of its officers or employees. In the event the Indemnified Parties are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding in any way involving such Claims, Developer shall provide a defense to the Indemnified Parties, or at the City's option, reimburse the Indemnified Parties their costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in defense of such Claims. In addition, Developer shall be obligated to promptly pay any final judgment or portion thereof rendered against the Indemnified Parities. Page 2 of 6 8. City Officers and Employees; Non -Discrimination. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Developer or any successor in interest in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Developer or to its successor or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 9. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for two years following the date it has been executed by both parties. 10. Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. To City: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 Attn: City Engineer To Developer: Lennar Home of California, Inc. 4004 Cook Street Palm Desert, CA 92211 . Attn: Norm Gasman, Site Development Manager 760/601-3100 11. Assignment of Agreement. The Developer may not assign, sublet, hypothecate, encumber, or transfer (whether voluntarily or involuntarily) its obligations hereunder to any party without the prior written consent of the City, which consent may be withheld in the City's sole and absolute discretion. 12. General Provisions. A. Except as otherwise provided herein, the terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. B. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. Page 3 of 6 C. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. D. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any rights or remedies provided for herein. E. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. F. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which when taken together, shall constitute one fully executed document. 13. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 14. Authority of Signatories. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 00 '0611 1 Page 4 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF LA QUINTA: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: Veronica Montecino, City Clerk City of La Quinta Date Developer: Lennar Home of California, Inc. 4004 Cook Street Palm Desert, California 92211 By: Date Title: By: Date Title: Lennar Home of California, Inc. Lennar Home of California, Inc. Approved as to Form: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta Date 0()01f133 Page 5 of 6 Exhibit A REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS — TRACT No. 29323-1 FRED WARING DRIVE MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS- PORT MARIA ROAD TO JEFFERSON STREET (APPROX. 2,050 L.F.) Item # Description Units Unit Cost 1 14-Foot Wide Landscape Median Improvements L.S. $586,670.00 - Required Off -Site Street Improvements Eligible for Reimbursements From Development Impact Fee Fund Quantity Total Cost 1 $586,670.00 (not to exceed) Total Cost for Required Improvements, not to exceed: $586,670.00 00019S;1 Reimbursement Agreement — C - Lennar DIF Agreement Page 6 of 6 Attachment 2 fN \T�+�ST'9Tt`' SITE 5S. , R. 7E. SCALE ()()� Olz'; ) Attachment 3 Resolution No. 2002-165 Cornerstone Development Tentative Tract 29323, Amendment #2 - FINAL December 17, 2002 Page 15 (c) The Applicant shall install a traffic signal at the project's main entry off Jefferson Street, at Dunbar Drive, when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50% of cost to design and install the traffic signal. 2) Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial) - 120 foot right-of-way. Widen the north side of the street along the project boundary to comply with the amended General Plan which may or may not be approved by the Council, pending on the outcome of the future General Plan Amendment. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk along the project frontage. (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from Jefferson Street to the westerly boundary of the Tentative Tract Map. (The landscape median improvements are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program.) (c) Traffic signal Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Necessary modifications to accommodate the improved roadway sections. B. PRIVATE STREETS 11 Looped Streets - Construct full 40-foot wide improvements within the 40 -foot right -of way. 2) Non -Looped Streets - Construct full 36 foot wide improvements within a 37 foot right-of-way. ATTACHMENT 4 CITY OF LA QUINTA: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (DIF) COST DETAIL Project Type: Major Arterial Project: Fred Waning Drive (Washington St to Jefferson Street) The proposed improvements include the installation of one additional travel lane, median island, and median island landscape and irrigation between Washington St. and Palm Royale; the installation of median island and median island landscape between Palm Royale and Adams; the installation of half a median island and median island landscape between Adams St. and Port Maria; one additional travel lane, median island, and median island landscaping between Port Maria and Jefferson St TEM DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANTITY UNIT COST ELIGIBLE DIF COST 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $201,377.74 $201,377.74 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $183,070.68 $183,070.68 3 DUST CONTROL LS 1 S78,834.26 $78,834.26 4 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS i S83,422.50 $83,422.50 5 6" MEDIAN CURB LF 17700 $7.50 S132,750.00 6 5 1/2" AC OVER 6 112" AB SF 43200 $3.25 S140,400.00 7 ADJUST VALVES/MANHOLES EA 35 5750.00 $26,250.00 8 SIGNING AND STRIPING LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 9 LANDSCAPE SF 159300 $3.50 S557,550.00 10 IRRIGATION SF IS 159300 $2.50 $398,250.00 11 ELECTRICAL 159300 $2 50 $398.250.00 SUB TOTAL $2,215.155.18 Estimated Soft Costs: Jun-05 (----- Design: S221,515.52 Ins ection/Testin /Survey, 5171,674.53 of Admin: $110,757.76 Contingency. 7407,865.45 Total Estimate: S3.126,968 43 Jmu: 7..700.5 --Phial Total DIF SHARE: $2,766,928.00 Developer Bonds: S360.040.00 Appeudrs -1 Li u/ 1 b') w4hf 4 rwQ" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of On -Site and Off -Site Improvements Associated with Tract Map No. 29053-1, Fiore at Renaissance, Trans West Housing, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept on -site and off -site improvements associated with Tract Map No. 29053-1, Fiore at Renaissance, Trans West Housing, Inc. and authorize staff to release performance securities upon receipt of warranty securities. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Acceptance of the off -site improvements will impact the General Fund as follows: Landscaping Maintenance is estimated to be $2,500 annually, which will be incorporated into the Landscape and Lighting District with the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Operating Budget. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: Il` •M BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Tract Map No. 29053-1, Fiore at Renaissance, is located on the west side of Jefferson Street approximately 946 linear feet north of Avenue 50 (Attachment 1). The improvements include curb & gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, storm drain, landscaping, signing, striping, and asphalt concrete pavement. All obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) and the Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. Attachment 2 indicates the amount of the warranty security. 01tn0' 9 1 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept the on -site and off -site improvements associated with Tract Map No. 29053-1, Fiore at Renaissance, Trans West Housing, Inc. and authorize staff to release performance securities upon receipt of warranty securities; or 2. Do not accept the on -site and off -site improvements associated with Tract Map No. 29053-1, Fiore at Renaissance, Trans West Housing, Inc. and do not authorize staff to release performance securities upon receipt of warranty securities; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, kthy R. y na n, P.EWorks Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: �iG e7 iLsro /� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Warranty Security (100 5 1 ATTACHMENT - I TM 29053-1 FIORE AT RENAISSANCE FD. 1- /. P. W/TAG RCE 23256 FD. 1 " LP. W/TAG LS 41 (DN. 0.8) ACCEPTED AS NW (FLUSH) PER CR 94-1JJ COR. S 5/8. SE 114 SEC. J2 ACCEPTED AS NE COR. PER CR 94-13J S 518, S£ 114 SEC. 32 PER RS 73183. CR 94-1 J3 N_89'25101 V 1321.95' N8974 27'W 1322.919 499.30' J7 36 2J 22 21 20 19 J8 35 24 COT 'C ° SHEET 5 ° 39 34 25 15 16 17 18 h n 40 33 26 j 14 /3 12 /1 41 32 27 JUL CT. LOT 'D 42 W 31 28 I t� 7 8 9 10 43 30 29 SEE SHEET LO F" N O DERfI( AUN DRIVE 0 89'511a1Y GOT J" N • lcJ� ,� SEE SHM 6 8N PARCEL 1 I N89S128"W n O LOT 238.16' H" PARCEL 5 y$ PAW. nM 22952 a b ^+ . P.H.B. 5195156-57 o a o ry Z $ 'W N89.5I' 236.25 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 4 WO h p bPARCEL ' PARCEL 2 PARCE'_ 5 o©o©ao J55.51 FD. 1" LP. W/TAG RCE 2J256 (FLUSH) PER I FD VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of On -site and Off -site Improvements Associated with Tract Map No. 29053-1, Fiore at Renaissance, Trans West Housing, Inc. APPLICANT: Ms. Jennifer James — Trans West Housing, Inc. ATTACHMENT - 2 TM 29053-1 FIORE AT RENAISSANCE 1. Performance Security shall be released immediately upon City Council acceptance. 2. Labor & Materials Security to remain in place for 90 days after City Council acceptance of improvements. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 20, 2007 a t 04 F ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of On -site and Off -site Improvements Associated with Tract O 5 Map No. 29053-1, Fiore at Renaissance, Trans West Housing, Inc. A ° 9`�Q APPLICANT: Ms. Jennifer James - Trans West Housing, Inc. ^forte -44 0.0 "; 0 IMPROVEMENTS Performance Security' Improvement Description Labor & Materlals2 Current Amount Proposed Reduction WARRANTY AMOUNTS Grading $159,500 $159,500 90% $15,950 Streets &Drainage $154,807 $154,807 90% $15,481 Domestic Water $119,806 $119,806 90% $11,981 Sanitary Sewer $105,795 $105,795 90% $10,580 Dry Utilities $77,400 $77,400 90% $7,740 Perimeter Wall -Jefferson Street $54,720 $54,720 90% $5,472 Perimeter Landscaping -Jefferson Street $22,424 $22,424 90% $2,242 Perimeter Wall -Avenue 50 $11,200 $11,200 90% $1,120 Perimeter Landscaping - Avenue 50 $8,000 $8,000 90% $800 Reimbursement costs /Jefferson Imp. $0 $7,600 100% $0 Reimbursement costs / Jeff -Ave 50 Traffic Signal $0 $6,000 100% $0 Monumentation $0 $8,500 100% $0 Engineering &Plans (20% of Construction) $0 $147,150 100% $0 No -Plans Contingency (35% of Project) $0 $309,018 100% $0 Totals $713,652 $1,191,918 - $71,365 T4ht 4 aCP Qu&rry COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time for Completion of the On -Site & Off -Site Improvements for Tract Map No. 31852, Polo Estates , Rindlesbach Construction, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _n CONSENT CALENDAR: 25 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution to extend the time for completion of the on -site and off -site improvements as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) to May 1, 2007 for Tract Map No. 31852, Polo Estates, Rindlesbach Construction, Inc. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Polo Estates (Tract Map No. 31852) is located on the northwest corner of Avenue 52 and Madison Street (Attachment 1). On August 17, 2004, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map No. 31852. On April 4, 2006, the City Council adopted a resolution granting conditional approval of the Final Map and SIA for Polo Estates. Section 6 of the SIA requires: "that the subdivision improvements shall be complete within twelve months after the approval of the SIA. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this SIA, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the pm J Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements." In a letter dated February 26, 2007 (Attachment 2), the developer requested a time extension and provided the City with an anticipated completion date of May 1, 2007 for the remainder of the on -site and off -site improvements. Staff has prepared the attached resolution which provides for approval of the time extension of the SIA. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of the on -site and of -site improvements as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement to May 1, 2007 for Tract Map No. 31852, Polo Estates, Rindlesbach Construction, Inc.; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of the on -site and off -site improvements time as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement to May 1, 2007 for Tract Map No. 31852, Polo Estates, Rindlesbach Construction, Inc.; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, "Aa�:z ISM/ Ti othy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Letter from Rindlesbach Construction, Inc., dated February 26, 2007 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION OF ON - SITE AND OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (SIA) FOR A SPECIFIED DATE OF MAY 1, 2007 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 31852, POLO ESTATES, RINDLESBACH CONSTRUCTION, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Tract 31852, Polo Estates on April 4, 2006, and WHEREAS, Section 6. Completion of Improvements, of the approved SIA requires that the Subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety days and complete the construction within twelve months after the approval of the Agreement, and WHEREAS, failure by the Subdivider to complete construction of the improvements by April 4, 2007, shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the approved agreement, and WHEREAS, Section 8. Time Extension, of the approved SIA allows for, at the City Council's sole and absolute discretion, an extension of time for completion of the on -site and off -site improvements with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The time for the completion of onsite and offsite improvements as required by the approved SIA is extended until the specified date of May 1, 2007. Section 2. The time extension for completing the improvements shall expire when City offices close for regular business on May 1, 2007. If the subdivider has not completed the improvements, the City, in its sole discretion and when deems necessary, may declare the Subdivider in default of the Agreement. A f_I A Section 3. The provided security amount as required in the approved SIA is satisfactory. No additional securities are required. Section 4. All other terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in the approved SIA shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 20th day of March, 2007, by the following vote'to wit: AYES:Council Members (Clerk's Office will enter) IkiNI*'31 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 0 c; ATTACHMENT - 1 TM 31852 - POLO ESTATES LA QUIN TA AVENUE 50 OF SEC. 4 w T. 6 S. �� O t�,Q` TRA1 L AVE 51 R. Q Z � Q o � m AVENUE 52 PROJECT S VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 20, 2007 oq H ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time of Completion of On -site & 7 5 Off -site Improvements for Tract Map No. 31852, Polo Estates, Rindlesbach Construction, Inc. APPLICANT: Mr. Mark Rindlesbach — Rindlesbach Construction, Inc. 0()0101 ATTACHMENT - 2 February 26, 2007 RE: Tract 31852 To: Ed Wimmer Mr. Wimmer, thank you for your recent letter updating us on the SIA for track 31852. This letter serves as our formal request for the extension of the SIA from March 15, 2007 to May 1 of 2007. Also included with this letter is the schedule for the work to be completed showing May 1, 2007 as the completion date. We are aware that this request needs to be formally presented to the City Council prior to March 15 2007, and we request that you formally put us on this agenda for their consideration. Please advise if I would need to be present for this meeting, and I would be happy to be present. If I can be of any further assistance in helping you with this extension please do not hesitate to call me at 760-399-7263. Best regards Blake Jumper COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time for Completion of On -Site & Off -Site Improvements for Tract Map No. 31311, Water Colors, Santa Rosa Development, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: 19 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution to extend the time for completion of on -site and off -site improvements as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) to January 1, 2008, for Tract Map No. 31311, Water Colors, Santa Rosa Development, Inc. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Water Colors (Tract Map No. 31311), is located on the north side of Avenue 48 between Adams Street and Dune Palms Road (Attachment 1). On November 18, 2003, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map No. 31311. On November 2, 2004, the City Council adopted a resolution granting conditional approval of the Final Map and SIA for Water Colors. Section 6 of the SIA requires: "that the subdivision improvements shall be complete within twelve months after the approval of the SIA. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this 0(50,103 SIA, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements." In a letter dated February 27, 2007 (Attachment 2), the developer requested a time extension and provided the City with an anticipated completion date of January 1, 2008, for the remainder of the on -site and off -site improvements. Staff has prepared the attached resolution which provides for approval of the time extension of the SIA. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of on - site and of -site improvements as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement to January 1, 2008, for Tract Map No. 31311, Water Colors, Santa Rosa Development, Inc.; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of on -site ,and off -site improvements time as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement to January 1, 2008, for Tract Map No. 31311, Water Colors, Santa Rosa Development, Inc.; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, &W441IX4�� Tim thy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Letter from Santa Rosa Development, Inc., dated February 27, 2007 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-( A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION OF ON - SITE AND OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (SIA) FOR A SPECIFIED DATE OF JANUARY 1, 2008 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 31311, WATER COLORS, SANTA ROSA DEVELOPMENT, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Tract 31311, Water Colors on November 2, 2004, and WHEREAS, Section 6. Completion of Improvements, of the approved SIA requires that the Subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety days and complete the construction within twelve months after the approval of the Agreement, and WHEREAS, failure by the Subdivider to complete construction of the improvements by November 2, 2005, shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the approved agreement, and WHEREAS, Section 8. Time Extension, of the approved SIA allows for, at the City Council's sole and absolute discretion, an extension of time for completion of the on -site and off -site improvements with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The time for the completion of onsite and offsite improvements as required by the approved SIA is extended until the specified date of January 1, 2008. Section 2. The time extension for completing the improvements shall expire when City offices close for regular business on January 2, 2008. If the subdivider has not completed the improvements, the City, in its sole discretion and when deems necessary, may declare the Subdivider in default of the Agreement. 0001 1IU Resolution No. Water Colors Tract Map No 31852 Adopted March 20, 2007 Page 2 of 2 Section 3. The provided security amount as required in the approved SIA is satisfactory. No additional securities are required. Section 4. All other terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in the approved SIA shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 20th day of March, 2007, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members (Clerk's Office will enter) NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California (City Sea]) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 00010*01 ATTACHMENT - I TM 31311 WATERCOLORS >>I It p W a. fY AVENUE 47 W PROJECT W Z NVI SITE tA g a Q ^ L AVENUE 48 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE w CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 20, 2007 04 o ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time of Completion of On -site & c7F � Off -site Improvements for Tract Map No. 31311, Water Colors, Santa Rosa Development, Inc. APPLICANT: Mr. Michael J. Shovlin — Santa Rosa Development, Inc. o ATTACHMENT - 2 SANTA ROSA DEVELOPMENT, INC. 46-753 Adams Street, La Qutata, CA 92253 (760) 771-3345 FAX (760) 771-0686 *jf� xx`'�, mT� Rai C hill C ER D hi;1R 0 5 2007 February 27, 2007 IPI OUC d`✓1'r=:y�3 Mr. Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. City of La Quinta Public Works/Engineering 78495 Calle Tampico LaQuinta, CA 92253 Reff, Watercolors Affordable Housing Project Dear Tim, Thank you for your letter of January 26, 2007. Watercolors is being built in four (4) phases and although we have completed the majority of the items listed on Exhibit "A" of both the "on site" and "off site" improvement agreements, we will require an extension to complete the final lift of asphalt and associated water valve, sewer manhole elevations and to complete the off site perimeter wall section (approximately 30 feet) crossing our current construction road. The final lift of asphalt will be the last item completed in the project after all home construction is complete. We would respectfully request that you provide an extension of the Subdivision Improvement Agreements until January 1, 2008 to allow our completion of the project and all listed Subdivision improvements. Sincerely, Michael J.,. ovlin President Enclosures S:\Santa Rosa Development\Tim Jonasson Ext of Time 2-27-07.doe RFC"o MAR 0 5 20o7 D' IOPMent Service 0001 I ow WNN y OF COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Avenue 54 Street Improvements from Jefferson Street to Madison Street Project No. 2005-1 1, and Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept Avenue 54 Street Improvements from Jefferson Street to Madison Street Project No. 2005-11, as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $56,399, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; and approve Contract Change Order No. 3 (Attachment 1) for a Contract Quantity Adjustment. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The following is a budget summary: Budget Total Project Expenditures through 2/28/07 Amount Available $ 697,015 $ 561,420 $ 135.595 Original Contract $ 543,650 Contract Change Order No. 1 &2 $ 25,900 Pending Contract Quantity Adjustment Credit CCO #3 $ (5,557) Total Construction Costs $ 563,993 Amount Paid to Contractor to Date $ 470,748 Remaining Fiscal Commitment Retention to be Billed 35 Days After Recordation Amount Remaining to be Billed $ 93,245 $ 56,399 $ 36,846 Adequate funding is available to pay the contractor's remaining billing ($36,846) and retention ($56,399) for project closeout. 001 t i CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. This project is partially funded with state and federal monies. Therefore, the project was advertised with a prevailing wage requirement included in the contract specifications. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The proposed improvements included rehabilitating the pavement within the two existing eastbound travel lanes on Avenue 54, from Jefferson Street to Madison Street. The existing pavement is 30 feet wide and 5,280 feet long. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) approved the Avenue 54 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements for STP funding, in the amount of $228,523 in April 2005. On May 17, 2005, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2005/2006 through 2009/2010 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Avenue 54 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement is included within the adopted CIP and scheduled for funding within the Fiscal Year 2006/2007. On September 15, 2006, the City was notified by Caltrans that Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) had approved the City's funding obligation request and authorized the City to proceed to construction. On November 7, 2006, City Council awarded a contract for $543,650 to Hazard Construction Company to construct the Avenue 54 Street Improvements from Jefferson Street to Madison Street Project No. 2005-11. On December 29, 2006, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a 30 working day contract completion time starting January 2, 2007, and ending on February 12, 2007. Contract Change Orders extended the project for a total of 3 working days, or February 15, 2007. The project was deemed substantially complete on February 8, 2007. The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Quantity adjustments must be made between the proposed bid quantities, and the actual quantities utilized. Actual quantities may vary due to incorrect bid quantities and/or additional areas being added to the project scope. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: Accept the Avenue 54 Street Improvements from Jefferson Street to Madison Street Project No. 2005-1 1 as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $56,399, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; and approve Contract Change Order No. 3 for a Contract Quantity Adjustment Credit; or 2. Do not accept Avenue 54 Street Improvements from Jefferson Street to Madison Street Project No. 2005-11 as 100% complete; do not authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; do not authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $56,399, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; and do not approve Contract Change Order No. 3 for a Contract Quantity Adjustment Credit; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4a 1�✓ Tim by R. Jonasso , P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Contract Change Order No. 3 �flt�11�. Attachment 1 Sheet 1 of 3 CONTRACT: Avenue 54 Street Improvements from Jefferson Street to Madison Street PROJECT NO. 2005-11 CONTRACTOR: Hazard Construction Company 6465 Mar Industry Pl. San Diego, Ca. 92121 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.3 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE This Contract Change order allows a Credit and Contract Adjustment of quantities between the Bid Item Quantities and the Actual Quantities Installed. Amount $ 5,557.00 Previous Contract Amount Through Change Order No. 2 $ 569,550.00 Add This Change Order No. 3 $ 5,557.00 Revised Contract Total $ 563,993.00 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: -0- working day added to contract time. The revised contract completion date shall be: 02/15/07 Submitted Approved We, the undersigned Contractor, havegiven careful consideration to the changeproposed and hereby agree, of this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as fill payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted Contractor: Date: { 3 S # 2 E § } \ / \ ( / \ / � � k � 03 , K ( 7 E 0 _\ c; g 9 9 q;;; 0; / ( § 40 fi \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2E \ \ \ \ ( } \ { \ \ ) \ \ }� # § \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ ) \ \ \ \ \ 2 / \ # # \ \ \ \ r f # f r . r s000m0000 • Construction Company CONSTRUCTION - MANAGEMENT e February 13, 2007 City of La Quints P.O. Box 1504 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 Attn: Leonard St Sauver Re: Avenue 54 Pavement Rehabilitation La Quinta, California HCC No. 06066 Mr. St Sauvec • SITE DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED FEB 20 2007 PUBLIC WORKS Change Order Request No. 4 This letter and the following cost breakdown are provided doe to reconciliation of the final field measured quantities on the above referenced project. A. Ave 54 Offsibe Improvements 1 Increase Item 8 - Excavate Existing Base & Sub -Grade (Unsuitable Area) 2 Increase Item 9 - Construct 6" CMB (pulverized AC Pavement) 3 Decrease Item 10 - Import & Place CMB 4 Increase Item 11 - Adjust Valve Can to Grade 200 CY@ $19.25 / CY = $3,850.00 383 CY @ $6.50 / CY = $2,489.50 (383) CY @ $35.50 / CY = ($13,596.50) 5 EA@ $340.00 / EA = $1,700.00 Grand Total: ($5,557.00) Please note that Hazard Construction Company is still awaiting the executed change orbs #1 and #2 for the extra work that was performed in conjunction with the removal of the buried man-made object and the remedial subgrade work. Please sign in the space provided below as your acceptance and authorization for us to proceed with this work prior to issuance of a contract change order. AVo-rdhor 3 Manager Agreed and Accepted: City of La Quints By: si�utare Name/fitle: Aimed JAM jam cc: Chuck Dotson COMPANY P.O. Box 229000 San Diego, CA 92192-90M • (858) 587-3600 • (858) 453-6034 Fax • License No. 750542A ceity/ 4 XP Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of the Restoration of Landscaping at Monticello I Development, West of Jefferson Street FX" X►Rl7:x" i Reif] Ira BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: II STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept the Restoration of Landscaping at Monticello I Development, West of Jefferson Street, Project No. 2000-19 as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $4,469, thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The following is a budget summary: Budget Total $ 44,690 Contract Award Amount $ 44,690 Total Construction Costs $ 44,690 Amount paid to date $ 40,221 Remaining Fiscal Commitment $ 0 Retention to be Released 35 Days after Recordation $ (4,469) Amount Remaining to be Billed $ 0 Adequate funding is available to pay the contractor's remaining billing and retention for project closeout. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: During the construction of the Phase II Jefferson Street Improvements, existing landscaped slopes adjacent to the Monticello development were impacted to accommodate the widened road section and sidewalk. The project plans and specifications did not address the restoration of the slopes and landscaping and it was determined such restoration was outside the scope of work of the Jefferson Street widening project. Cost proposals were received from the Jefferson Street widening project contractor and from Candyl Golf Group, the landscape maintenance contractor for the Monticello Development. Only two bids were solicited for this work due to the difficulties of the ongoing construction along Jefferson Street. The proposal from Candyl Golf Group was considerably lower and additionally the Monticello Development had a good working relationship with this contractor. The Resident Engineer from the County of Riverside provided reimbursement information in a letter dated October 10, 2006. The letter stated during a September 27, 2006 meeting, Anne Azzo, Transportation Engineer for Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) agreed that the City of La Quinta will execute the work, pay the contractor directly and submit the billing to CVAG for reimbursement. On November 7, 2006, the City Council approved an agreement for $44,690 with Candyl Golf Group to restore landscaping at Monticello I Development, west of Jefferson Street. On November 29, 2006, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a forty (40) working day contract completion time starting December 11, 2006, and ending on February 8, 2007. The project was deemed substantially complete on February 8, 2007 with 40 working days utilized. The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. 0)0117 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 Accept the Restoration of Landscaping at Monticello I Development, West of Jefferson Street, Project No. 2000-19 as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $4,469, thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 2 Do not Accept the Restoration of Landscaping at Monticello I Development, West of Jefferson Street, Project No. 2000-19 as 100% complete; do not authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and do not authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $4,469, thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 3 Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Timo y R.Jonasson, .E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager aJ �OF Tt� COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Discussion of the Draft 2007-2008 Economic Development Plan RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: _ STUDY SESSION: Review the 2007-2008 Draft Economic Development Plan and provide staff with direction on the policies, recommended implementation activities, and overall direction of the City's economic development efforts. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. The 2007-2008 implementation activities will be included within the Fiscal Year 2007-2008 budget. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The City Charter and its principles of "home rule" allow the City sufficient flexibility to undertake economic development activities. The Charter allows the City "to utilize revenues from the General Fund to encourage, support, and promote economic development." BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City of La Quinta is in the twelfth year of a proactive economic development implementation effort. In June 1995, the City Council directed staff to initiate an economic development strategic planning process that concluded in May 1996, with the adoption of the first Economic Development Plan. Thereafter, the plan has been reviewed and updated on an annual basis. Included as Attachment 1 is the redline Draft 2007-2008 Economic Development Plan for City Council review. Once adopted, this plan will be one of five components that comprise the City's overall strategic planning effort: the other components include the Capital Improvement Program, Resource Allocation Plan, Annual Financial Management Review, and the 2007-2008 Annual Operating Budget. Last year was very successful in terms of economic development. Retail growth continues along the Highway 111 Corridor, with the addition of Costco, Sam's Club, Henry's Market, Bed Bath & Beyond, and many more retailers. Although the Corridor is nearing build -out, there are a few vacant properties that could accommodate revenue -generating development. In the Village, several office buildings have been completed, the Embassy Suites opened, Phase II of Old Town is complete, and a luxury condominium complex is in the works. And, the Washington Corridor now includes a Homewood Suites and related casitas units. Major goals for 2007-2008 include ongoing study of the City's Sphere of Influence; continuing with the City's successful housing programs and projects; implementing the Disposition and Development Agreement for SilverRock Resort private development; initiating update of the Village Design Guidelines and Zoning Codes; considering land acquisition for park and recreation uses; and continuing to market shop and dine, tourism, and golf opportunities in the City. Last year, the City commissioned a new Market Study, which is more focused than previous studies, taking a closer look at the markets for the City's three major commercial districts (the Village, Highway 111, and SilverRock Resort), as well as projected retail demand in the sphere of influence area. The Market Study Overview Analysis is attached to the draft 2007-2008 Economic Development Plan as Exhibit B. After today's study session, staff will incorporate the Council's changes and suggestions. A final version will be brought back for Council adoption on April 17, 2007. Respectfully submitted, I ea—Q— Debbie Powell, Management Analyst Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . Draft 2007-2008 Economic Development Plan io n ATTACHMENT1 City of La Quinta ', Deleted:6 � l aI� 11 • Deleted: May 16, 2006¶ Formatted: Spanish (Mexico) City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Califomia 92253 Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. 309 West4`h Street Santa Ana, California 92701 P: 714.541.4585 F: 714.541.1175 E-Mail: info@webrsg.com Contents of This Document This document is organized as follows: 1) Introduction ■ Rationale for this Economic Development Plan ■ Participants in Formulating and Implementing this Plan 2) Resources, Opportunities, Liabilities and Needs ■ Community Profile ■ Key Assets ■ Liabilities ■ Projected Market Demand ■ Projected City/Redevelopment Agency Financial Resources for Economic Development ■ City/Agency Real Estate Assets ■ Infrastructure Needs/City Capital Improvement Program al Business Plan • Mission Statement ■ Implementation Policies ■ Fiscal Year 200L6-07 Accomplishments a) Highway 111 Corridor b) The Village c) Annexation Feasibility d) Resort/Hospitality Opportunities e) Housing f) Marketing ■ 2007-0p Implementation Activities and Target Areas g) Highway 111 Corridor h) The Village i) Annexation Feasibility j) Resort/Hospitality Opportunities k) Recreation Opportunities 1) Housing m) Marketing I_177�f1e717 Exhibit A: City/Agency Real Estate Assets Map Exhibit B: April 2006 Overview Analysis of Market Opportunities prepared by Economic Research Associates (ERA) for the City of La Quinta Deleted: 5 Deleted:6 Deleted: 6 ', Deleted:7 2007-08 Ecorill DewlOpment Plan Strategies and Tasks to Stimulate Private Investment in La Quinta 10, The City of La Quinta is embarking on the welfth year of implementing economic development initiatives. To date the City's efforts have yielded major retailers, upscale restaurants, a Homewood Suites Hotel, and the new resort and golf venues at SilverRock Resort. The focus for the coming fiscal year is fifes fold. The first two involve SilverRock Resort. The Redevelopment Agency bias development of g—boutique hotel.�eature hotel and resort retail vmage: the {agency eNill now jmnemenj_and mgnitor,_he_Di�osition and_.Deyelopment Agreement. The Agency will also comolete the design and hegln construction of the on -site infrastructurr�t S lv_erRUck-,, as well as initiate design activities related to $he permanent clubhouse and second golf course. The third entails further defining the markets the City's three commercial districts (the Highway 111 corridor, the Village and SilverRock Resort) serve to ensure that the City's economic development initiatives will maximize the benefits to each district. The fourth entails planning for future retail uses that will serve the anticipated population growth in the unincorporated area within the City's sphere of influence. existing businesses and exmansio t_____ The City's economic development efforts will continue to maintain a balance between securing quality revenue -generating development while preserving La Quinta's cultural and natural features. The goal is to insure that the short-term gain realized from achieving revenue -generating uses does not compromise the long-term necessity for quality development that withstands the test of time. Thus, the economic development initiatives presented in this Economic Development Plan center on attracting and enhancing revenue -generating enterprises, protecting open space and environmental attributes, and expanding recreation opportunities for La Quinta's residents. This Plan outlines a vision and direction for the City's economic development activities. It presents the mission statement, implementation policies, projected resources, and business plan the City and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency will follow to sustain a comprehensive economic development effort. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA ' P_a'Ch 2�i, ��07 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Deleted: 6 Deleted: 7 {_Deleted: eleventh _ _— Deleted: four Deleted: will be Deleted: ing Deleted: the developer negotiations ,I { Deleted: involving the SilverRock resort properties in order to facilitate the Deleted: the (Deleted: and Deleted: beg, Deleted: anon Deletetl: ing Deleted: of Deleted: initiate Deleted: building Deleted: community Deleted: construct Deletetl: in the future Deleted: May 16, 2006 INTRODUCTION PAGE 2 Rationale for this Economic Development Plan The economic development process is the deliberate, judicious intervention in the local economy to foster a business climate that facilitates private investment. This process is neither exact nor fully predictable, and is more of an art than a science. Economic development is a dynamic, ever changing endeavor because it must constantly accommodate the evolving characteristics of the market place. Thus, the City annually reviews and updates this Plan to ensure that it reflects and responds to current market conditions, and equally as important, the community's collective vision as to how to accommodate these conditions. Finally, this enterprise parallels the activities associated with building a city; thus this Plan embraces a long-term vision rather than a short-term perspective. In 1996, the City of La Quinta adopted the first economic development plan that defined the community's desires for future development, and presented a business plan to guide the City's economic development initiatives. The City then embarked on a planned, pro -active economic development effort for the following reasons: Capture Forecasted Growth for the Coachella Valley A variety of market studies forecast continued growth for the Coachella Valley during the next decade. This is demonstrated by the new major retailers that have located in the Highway 111 corridor during the past year. Due to its prime location and the expanding population of the Eastern Central Coachella Valley the City is positioned to capture a sizable portion of the projected commercial, resort, and residential development through the business expansion and recruitment efforts delineated in this Economic Development Plan, Balance Municipal Revenue and Expenditure Needs The City's primary revenue resources are transient occupancy and sales taxes. During fiscal year 2OO,6-Q? these revenues comprised 36% of the City's total General Fund revenue; sales tax revenue income generated approximately 23% of total General Fund revenue and transient occupancy tax revenue will generate approximately 13% of total General Fund revenue. Secondary resources are license/permit fees and property tax revenue. A majority of the City's property tax revenue, however, is allocated to the Redevelopment Agency. Approximately 80% of the land area within the City's corporate boundaries is in one of two redevelopment project areas. Combined, these resources maintain existing, and provide new, services to La Quinta's residential and business communities. Resort and commercial development generates a majority of the municipal revenues received by the City. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA n; d.ch 2p, 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN . Deleted: 5 Deleted: 6 -- -- Deleted: 5 j Deleted:2 Deleted: May 16, 2006 INTRODUCTION PAGE 3 The City and Redevelopment Agency must continue to enlarge the City's revenue base in order to enhance and expand the quality of municipal services La Quinta residents expect. , Judiciously Allocate Municipal Resources Like any business, the City continually balances the allocation of financial resources between service costs and infrastructure investment. To prudently accomplish this task, the City annually implements a comprehensive strategic planning effort that meshes this Economic Development Plan with a Five Year Municipal Service Resource Allocation Plan, a Five Year Capital Improvement Program, Annual City/Agency Financial Management Strategies, and Annual City/Agency Operating Budgets. Since 1994, the City has achieved many short - and long-term financial goals identified through the strategic planning effort. This Economic Development Plan .identifies economic development investment strategies and initiatives that are subsequently funded through the annual City/Redevelopment Agency Capital and Operations budgets. Participants in Formulating and Implementing this Plan This Economic Development Plan delineates initiatives that implement the communites vision of its desired destiny. It outlines policies, activities, and resources the City will pledge to guide and/or influence future development decisions. Thus, the primary participants in formulating and implementing this Plan are the residential and business communities that define La Quinta. When first developed, the City sponsored a series of community forums to solicit community input. The City continues to consult with these communities during the Plan's implementation phases. The City Council governs the formulation and implementation of this Plan. Council Members bring forth constituent ideas and needs, and assist with defining the issues, mission, strategy, and overall policies that guide implementation efforts. Finally, City staff plays a strategic role in this endeavor. Staff is charged with the responsibility to monitor market conditions, solicit community input, interface with existing and new users, implement programs and initiatives, and monitor achieved results. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC CITY OF LA QUINTA ,iVa'ch 20, 3 007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, Deleted: Enlarging the Cay's revenue base a partzularty important given that the State continues to reallocate local revenue to fund State obligations in order to i address its budget deficits _Deleted: May 16_2006 !',�7,"ttl, Section li LI ' .,ill Deleted: 2006 2007.08 Economic Development P `= Strategies and Tasks to Stimulate Private Investment in La Quint@ This section presents the background data that was used in developing the Business Plan presented in Section 3; it includes a summary of key assets, presents an overview of projected market demand, delineates projected City/Agency resources, and outlines infrastructure needs. Community Profile The City of La Quinta is located in the Eastern Central Coachella Valley; Indian Wells borders the City to the west, Indio to the east, and unincorporated communities to the north and south. Located approximately 2 miles south of Interstate 10, primary access is via State Highway 111 and Washington Street. Per the. State of California Department of Finance, the City's 200,6 population was 38 34Q Per Wheeler's Desert Letter,_La Quinta hna median household income of $65�544 Only Indian Wells and Rancho Mirage had higher median household incomes. In the context of the Coachella Valley, La Quinta also enjoys an emerging population of new families with an average household size of 2.85 persons; 64% of La Quinta's population is under 44 years of age (the median age is 36.4), and persons over the age of 65, historically the most recognized age group in the Valley, comprise only 13.4% of La Quinta's population. Claritas Incorporated, a demographic research firm, estimates that 151,705 persons live within a five mile radius of La Quinta, 243,517 live within a 10 mile radius, and 322,871 live within a 15 mile radius. Within the same geographical areas, the estimated average household income was $74,387, $73,511, and $70,407, respectively. During 200.5, total axable sales within the City of La Quinta were $68a million. Accordin to the Cit of La Quinta's 2006 Com rehensive Annual Financial R2 rt the City's assessed valuation for 2006 was $1�( billion. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA ' wdj d0 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN . Deleted: Wheeler's Desert Letter Deleted: 4 Deleted: 6 .1 5 - - Deleted: 0 wnh Deleted: 1,480 Deleted: 4 Deleted: retell { Deleted: 0 Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal Deleted: T i Deleted: 6 Deleted: 792 ".., 1, Deleted: May 16. 2006 RESOURCES, OPPORTUNITES AND MARKET PROFILE PAGE 5 Key Assets Review of the City's physical characteristics and discussions with the residential and business communities identify the following key community assets: • an educated, dedicated, and highly motivated residential and business community that share a long history of working in concert to provide a stable environment that supports economic development efforts; e an international reputation for resort and golf amenities resulting from the La Quinta Resort & Club, PGA West, Rancho La Quinta, The Tradition, The Quarry, The Hideaway _Madison Club Griffin Rancii La Quinta Country Club, and SilverRock Resort; e the City hosts renowned golf tournaments such as the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic, which has helped earn it the title of "America's Ultimate Golfing Destination" by the acclaimed Robb Report; e the Highway 111 commercial corridor which is nearing build -out. features a few prime vacant properties of sufficient size to accommodate development that will serve the Eastern Coachella Valley and will generate significant financial returns for both the City and Agency; e a market area with the highest per capita income in the Coachella Valley; e the Village of La Quinta, a commercial center nestled in the Santa Rosa Mountains, that offers a setting that is unparalleled in the Coachella Valley; e La Quinta's commerce, art and cultural heritage as represented by the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce, La Quinta Arts Foundation and La Quinta Historical Society, that supports art and cultural activities attracting patrons from California and the greater southwest; e the 525 acre Agency -owned SilverRock Resort golf and resort property, home to the Arnold Palmer Classic Course which Golf Magazine selected as one of the "top ten new golf courses that you can play'; • the Lake Cahuilla Recreation Area which provides water sport and other outdoor recreation opportunities; • continued strong residential development and sales activity which generates a significant number of households to support retail, recreation, and service commercial users; • a highly motivated City workforce that understands the needs of the business community and the need to process required City approvals within a short ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA 'v arch 20 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Deleted: and The Skins Game Deleted: Deleted: ve I Deleted: May 16, 2006 RESOURCES, OPPORTUNITES AND MARKET PROFILE PAGE 6 time frame; resources that the City/Agency can dedicate to economic development investment; and • availability of professional and medical office space. Liabilities Though the assets far outweigh the liabilities, there are limitations that the City must account for when implementing its economic development initiatives; these include the following: • competition between Coachella Valley communities to provide financial incentives to major developers and users, which significantly influence their location decisions; • competition for golf and resort patrons with other Coachella Valley cities who are improving their public golf amenities in order to attract new, and expand existing, resort and hotel uses; and • evolving retailing trends that render existing retail centers obsolete while potentially decreasing the need for new retail centers. Projected Market Demand The Agency commissioned Economic Research Associates (ERA) to conduct a new market study to assess near- and mid-term trends that will influence economic development efforts. The Market Study specifically focuses on market conditions and development opportunities within the City's main commercial corridors (Highway 111, The Village, and SilverRock Resort) and within the Sphere of Influence area. ERA summarized key findings in the April 2006 Overview Analysis of Market Opportunities, which is included as Exhibit B to this Plan. Projected City/Redevelopment Agency Financial Resources for Economic Development As part of its ongoing resource management effort, the City annually evaluates City/Redevelopment Agency financial resources and identifies those resources that can be pledged to economic development initiatives. During development of the 20Q7-Q8 Fiscal Year Budget, staff will specifically identify funds available for I Deletea_6 economic development initiatives. These funds are basically one-time resources ( Deleted: 7 that will most likely not be renewed when expended. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA 4Va'cti 2i 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Deleted: May 16, 2006 r RESOURCES, OPPORTUNITES AND MARKET PROFILE PAGE 7 City/Agency Real Estate Assets Since 1983, the City and Redevelopment Agency have accumulated real estate assets as a result of major infrastructure projects or as part of the Agency's affordable housing efforts. Exhibit A, in the Appendix of this Plan, presents a map of the real estate assets owned by the City or Redevelopment Agency. City/Redevelopment Agency real estate assets currently available for economic development include SilverRock Resort, owned by the Redevelopment Agency„ (Deleted: and the City's holdings located at the top of the Cove, and sev-eraRroperties in the La Deleted: Quinta Village including a 104-snaee municipal parklnq lot Infrastructure Needs/City Capital Improvement Program As part of the annual strategic planning effort the City conducts a comprehensive review of the community's infrastructure needs. The City then addresses these needs through the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program. This Program identifies both current year and projected five-year capital improvement needs and resources, and delineates an annual funding schedule for specific infrastructure projects. This Economic Development Plan is integrated with the Capital Improvement Program to ensure that the infrastructure impediments to specific economic development projects are addressed, or where possible, economic development project implementation activities mitigate site -specific capital improvement needs. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA OU INTA Bch Z0- ZOOf ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Deleted: May 16. 2006 10)0O129 1 , I a «e • e Strategies and Tasks to Stimulate Private Investment in La Quinta In order to proceed with implementation activities, a business plan is required that presents a mission statement describing the intended outcome the community wishes to achieve, and the overall policies that will guide implementation activities. Finally, specific target areas and implementation efforts are detailed. Mission Statement The mission statement the community formulated for this economic development effort is as follows: The mission of the Economic Development effort is to actively support the development and expansion of existing businesses, and to proactively recruit quality revenue - generating uses that diversify and expand the City's economic base, offer a variety of products and services, increase employment opportunities, enhance City/Agency fiscal resources, preserve and enhance La Quinta's unique environment, and contribute to the quality of life for La Quinta residents. Implementation Policies The following policies guide the City's Economic Development implementation efforts. They address resource and staffing commitments, annexation strategies, use of City assets, and refinement of City processes. These policies guide City staff as they pursue implementation initiatives. Active Participation in Economic Development The City will actively implement economic development initiatives by committing resources to market development opportunities through direct contact with property owners, commercial and industrial enterprises, resort and lodging operators, and developers. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC CITY OF LA QUINTA ,lyLwch 202007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, jDeleted: e Deleted: 7 ,Deleted: May 16, 2006 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 9 Financial Resources Commitment The City and Redevelopment Agency will annually dedicate funds to support economic development and infrastructure improvement activities. Business Retention/Expansion The City will work with the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce to facilitate business development and expansion opportunities involving existing La Quinta businesses. Economic Base Diversification Emphasis will be placed on pursuing opportunities that will dynamically enhance and diversify La Quinta's economic base to include a balance of retail, recreation, and resort uses. City/Agency Private Project Investment City/Redevelopment Agency financial investment will be primarily limited to underwriting infrastructure and municipal fee costs, obtaining operating and use covenants, and rehabilitating/refurbishing older commercial structures and centers for projects that enhance overall City development and growth. Assisted projects must feature enhanced design and landscaping amenities, and enhanced building and site maintenance requirements to insure that these amenities are maintained for the life of the development. City/Agency Return on Investment When considering City/Redevelopment Agency investment in commercial, resort or office development projects, the City/Redevelopment Agency must achieve a 15% to 18% return on the City/Agency investment by the third year of operation. The development project revenue included in this analysis is sales tax, transient occupancy tax and property tax revenue; City development permit and impact fee revenue may not be included as development project revenue. Further, City service costs must first be deducted from development project revenue. The City/Redevelopment Agency investment should be fully repaid within a 10-year period, with every attempt to achieve repayment within a 5- to 8-year period. Private Project Investment • Financial Need For commercial, industrial, office or resort development projects that request City/Redevelopment Agency financial investment, the City/Redevelopment Agency shall find that off -site infrastructure improvement costs, municipal fee costs, and/or property and building refurbishment and rehabilitation costs are so excessive that the project warrants public investment to underwrite some of these costs in order to generate sufficient returns to attract private investment. Further, Deleted: May 16, 2006 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA 1p-C7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 000121 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE /0 if City/Redevelopment Agency financial investment is targeted towards obtaining operating and use covenants, the City/Redevelopment Agency shall find that the desired user achieves the City/Agency Return on Investment parameters described above and generates additional employment, retail and/or recreation opportunities for La Quinta residents. Reuse of Vacant Commercial Facilities The City/Redevelopment Agency will pro actively work to ensure the reuse of commercial facilities that remain vacant for 6 months or more. These activities will include working with property owners and tenants to identify reuse opportunities, identify site and building improvement needs, and facilitate user/developer recruitment efforts. Land Use Plannin enhance municipal fiscal balance the City the Qity_is cony_ersion_of Tourist Commercial Zoning_to.Residential__artd Resort Residential iancl uses. Prior to consideration of any request to conve t land uses a detailed fiscal analysis and fiscal mitigation nrogram shall be required. Highway II I Corridor, In order to enhance commercial opportunities the City/Redevelopment Agency has secured two major retail anchors for the east end of this corridor. In doing so, this corridor will have major demand generating anchors located in the corridor's west, middle and eastern sectors. The City/Redevelopment Agency will work on filling remaining vacant parcels. The City/Redevelopment Agency will then be in a position to reduce, if not cease, its involvement in facilitating vacant land development and instead focus exclusively on facilitating the reuse of obsolete commercial facilities. Environmental Compatibility In order to maintain, protect and enhance La Quinta's unique physical environment, all new development projects will be reviewed with added emphasis on their compatibility with their environmental setting to insure preservation of La Quinta's unique natural desert and mountain landscape. Regional Transportation Opportunities The City will pursue joint efforts with regional agencies that facilitate the expansion of rail and air transportation services, including the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, to support the transportation needs of La Quinta's resort, commercial, and other uses. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA va,-h 20.2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN . ' Deleted: Anchor Tenants i Deleted: May 16. 2006 rj11 "7 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 11 Annexation Opportunities The City may pursue annexation opportunities, as requested, that are economically sustainable, enhance the City's economic future,_p ovide workforce affordable housing oppo tunities. and protect environmentally sensitive areas Deleted: that are crucial to the La Quinta experience. These will include properties that expand resort and golf course development opportunities, accommodate commercial, industrial, and transportation uses, protect environmentally sensitive areas,_ -+scenic vistas, and enhance equestrian opportunities. The City will also , 11 Deleted: and review potential impacts on current residents and seek ways to mitigate impacts, if they exist._ Prior to -any -annexations in_Plannin�_Areas_l and 2_a,detailed fiscal analysis and elan for services shall be required. Future annexations should be evenue-neutra€ or nosiiive to ensure long-terrn fiscal balance. Municipal Properties The City will pursue the timely sale and/or development of all City/Agency owned surplus property with uses that maintain, protect and enhance the environment while achieving a return on the initial City/Agency investment. Recreation Opportunities The City will develop a second municipal golf course andplubhouse at SilverRock Deleted_ Resort, and other recreational uses that are compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Further, efforts will be made to develop a comprehensive trail system that links the recreation amenities at Lake Cahuilla and in the Santa Rosa Mountains with the City's residential and resort communities. The City will continue its participation in regional planning efforts to complete a trail system between La Quinta and Palm Desert, inform citizens and residents of the project's progress, and publicize this recreation opportunity once the trail is complete. Streetscape Improvements Future major arterial streetscape and median improvements will be designed to impart a sense of place and a feeling unique only to La Quinta so that residents, visitors and other travelers will experience a sense of arriving at a special destination when traveling to or through La Quinta. Highway I I I Corridor Land Use Diversification The City will encourage the development of commercial, service commercial, office, lodging, theater, and light industrial uses within the Highway 111 corridor to diversify the community s economic base. The_Ciiy should- consider pyohibitin ,l Deleted: May 16, 2006 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA OUINTA V.*:ch 202007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN - IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 12 Education The City recognizes the value of enhancing educational opportunities in the Coachella Valley, and therefore, has supported efforts to expand the California State University, San Bernardino — Palm Desert Campus via a total contribution of $1,000,000, with a second installment of $250,000 paid this past fiscal year, for Deleted: the future Health Sciences building. Staff Development City staff will continually work to refine and improve their skills as they relate to fulfilling the mission of the economic development plan and program while reinforcing the perspective that the City's economic survival depends on City staffs ability to serve the public in a courteous, efficient and knowledgeable manner. Prepare New and Update Existing Information Documents On an ongoing basis, City staff will prepare new, and update existing, promotional and community information documents for circulation to potential users and developers. _-- .._._.__- Deleted:5 Fiscal Year 20QW7 Accomplishments Deleted: 6 The Business Plan presented in the 2005_-0Z, Economic Development Plan identified i Deleted: 5 specific target areas and activities to accomplish during the fiscal year. The following Deleted-: 6 summarizes the accomplishments by target area, as of March 200.7. 1rDeleted: e Highway I I I Corridor Marketing Highway 111 Properties. City staff continued to work with Highway 111 property owners to jointly pursue marketing opportunities. This included promoting development opportunities at the International Council of Shopping Centers' Palm Springs Conference, working with property owners to address impediments to development, and facilitating development proposal entitlement needs. Highway 111 f;ommercial Corridor Costco opened a new tacilii amend provided the anchor with an additional shopp ng center. San -Vs Club is under construction and will open early ibis near. uta Dealer RetentianlEx ansion. City staff has-been working with the owner of Torre Nissan_to facilitate dealership expansion, which willallow there- to stay at their La Quinta site. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA Xa�ch 2-0 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN . Deleted: Anchor Tenant Recruitment Deleted: During this period the City concluded a land sale transaction with Sam's Club who veil be constructing a warehouse center, and also entered into a 10-year operating covenant with Costco These actions secured two anchor enants for eastern segment of the Highway 111 1 corridor. Deleted: May 16, 2006 00,C124 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 13 currently being investigated. Miles[Washirlgton Prop_erty._7he Disposition and_Developmgnf Agreernent was amended to facilitate the sale of_rnedical_af ie Rroperty-tn Eisenhower Medical Center. In addition the Hol tewood Suites hotel is exoected to open in March 2007, The Village Parking Study Gampleted parkinU capacity and Eocation study that evaluated I mar. movement patterns, understandinU of future parkinU and related management conditions. The city Council_ also directed staff to look at pedestian-friendly mrassi ings. New Development There is a new mixed use (commercial and office) complex Annexation Feasibility Annexation. Continued to work with interested property owners on evaluating the costs and benefits of annexations. The City has prepared a range of fiscal models that have been utilized to evaluate overall Sphere of Influence (SOI) fiscal conditions as well as evaluate specific annexation proposals and development projects. The City has participated in Riverside County Task Force meetings and has conducted several public workshops to assist the City in developing a comprehensive annexation and land use program. Resort/Hospitality Opportunities SilverRock Resort. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC CITY OF LA QUINTA ;dash ZI) 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 Deleted: Facllitlea Deleted: Constructed public parking facilities at the northwest comer of Avenida Bermudas and Avenida Montezuma, The City also commissioned a comprehensme parking study to identify cuff ant and future parking demand, and on- and off -site parking facilities that will be needed to accommodate this demand. Deleted: The City opened the Phase 1 tournament golf course (the Arnold Palmer Classic Course at SilverRock) The Agency conducted a developer/operator solicitation process that resulted in an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Destnabon Development Company (DOC), a Lowe Enterprises Company. The Agency then accepted a conceptual site plan in June 2005 and authorized staff to negotiate a property disposition and development agreement(DDA). The current schedule anticipates presenting the ODA to the City Council and Agency Board for consideration in June 2006 Deleted: May 16, 2006 00012-5 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 14 Housing La Quintal Rental Housing Program. The Agency sold _homes to {Deleted:3 1 residents from the Vista Dunes Mobile Home Park, who could qualify for a first trust deed mortgage and who saved funds for a down payment and closing costs. All three home sales were to very low income households. Watercolors. The Agency amended the Affordable Housing Agreement to increase funding for second trust deed homebuver mortgages. In doing so, the Agency is facilitating home purchases by both low and moderate income households Prior to this amendment only moderate income households could afford to purchase homes in this neighborhood. The Watercolors _. development is comprised of _149- single-family homes affordable to ,households aged _55-years_and older.- _ _..-.----.________--------------_________...., Vista Dunes Mobile Home Park. The Agency acquired this older mobile home park in May 2004 with all 92 households successfully relocated by January 2005. 80 single family and duplex homes are under construction - with completion anticipated by the Summer of 2008 The homes will then be Avenue 48/Dunes Palms Road property. In March 2006 the Agency 2007 round. New Property Acquisition The Agency has initiated two property properties into the City. Upon annexation the Agency will then formulate a The Agency is also assembling a 512 acre site on Dune Palms Road southeast of Westward Ho Drive comprised of 6 parcels of which 5 are ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA JUn_ch pr._ zJp7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, Deleted: Site construction activities commenced with home sales underway Deleted: The Affordable Housing Agreement will facilitate development of 1 Deleted: moderate -income _ J Deleted: The site and buk,,n2 plans are under final review with sde improvements and home construction activities starting in July 2006 �D(Ham mer)ated.r) Deletetl:T _J Deleted: purchased this I Deleted: May 16, 2006 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 15 4" property, and acquisition negotiations continue with the remaining two property owners. Marketing Television Deleted: in July 2004 In July 2005 : the Agency selected the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC) to design an affordable multi -family development, and to conduct project structuring and funding negotiations These activities concluded with both the Agency and CVHC approving a disposition and development agreement in March 2006 The next step entails securing tax credit and State multi -family housing program funding, and initiating site and building construction Deleted: Economic development infomercial from previous year aired in Orange County In addition, two new 30-second spots were produced and aired locally, as well as in Orange and Los Angeles Counties promoting La Quinta as a great place to visit far shmirima, dmmg, and golf. ,. Deleted: a Print & Radio Advertising. Launched Stay/Play & Shop/Dine campaign via ,. Deleted: he publications such as the Los Angeles Times, pesert Sun, ))esert_Entertainer, , and La Quince Sun. Campaign was supported by radio in the local market Del etl: The et { Deleted: and-� Advertised in the following program guides/publications: International Council Deleted: Prepared of Shopping Centers (ICSC); Bob Hope Chrysler Classic; La Quinta Arts Deleted: Coordinated a feature article for Jetsettin the West Festival; Palm Springs Life; and Official State Visitor's Guide. Magazine and innated working relationship with editor of LQ Public Relations. Executed a proactive public relations effort especially for Magazine for continued City coverage. SilverRock Resort and the Arnold Palmer Classic Course Organized various Deleted:-6 special events e q the official document signing with Lowe and issued press, , I Deleted: , c releases on numerous items of interest. Announced news programs, Deleted:athird proiects. and classes to the media and the public at large., Deleted: City calendar Business Expositions/Special Event Attendance. Participated in ICSC's '.:,( Deleted: for Deletetl: ion Western Division Conference, BizNet 2007 (Chambers of La Quinta, Indio, -- -- — — —� and Coachella), and the City's annual picnic. Deleted: o ,I Deletetl: Le Quinta City Communication Pieces. Produced City Report (newsletter) on a r` .', Deleteli featuring and promoting quarterly basis for distribution to La Quinta residents. ___,fC Bated ourth annual_.` ------- { ;, silverReck Resort, initiated re -design of CityPages in the Chamber monthly y commemorating La Quinta's 25hAnniversary, nd distrlbuted,ps .- newspaper Ifg (t0 Cl�esldent$r :- Deleted: May 16, 2006 ; ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA Va,ch20 2_007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN CIoli?1 42 7 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 16 nity Services. Maximized exposure for SilverRock Resort marketing additional accomplishments include: Outdoor Billboard Advertising. A new .rotator (traveling) billboard was �ateci and rotated throughout the Valley at prominent locations. Television Advertising. A new 30-second spot as filmed and produced, broadcasted locally on all__three_--local__ networks -,during various golf tournaments,Xnajor sporting events and selected mnrnin and evenin news time slots. Also, the 4t.h Annual Jim Murray SilverRock Alumni Challenge was played nNov_ember 2006 at SilverRock Resort with two live interviews that SilverRock was -featured on -the Joy Short Show -in November 2006„ Print Advertising. Advertised in The Desert Sun and various local and n�ional golf publications such as Desert Golf Magazine, Palm Springs Life, Fore Maqazine, Golf News, Southern California Golf News, and Southland Sales Tool Kit/Media Kit. overall development, Revise/Update Rack Cards. Created and printed a new rack card which provides current golf rates and relevant information including directions, website address, and phone number. Public Relations. Continued to research and implement public relations efforts. verRQck was recogn zed as the #1 ublic oIf course in the Palm Soring_s Area by Greenskeeper.oro. This has been Incorporakad into several of our ads_ and, marketing campa-ign throughout the_year. _Also SilverRock will ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA Y a t h 20 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Deleted: Marketing Recruitment Program. Completed busmess recruitment program via resident survey, and creation of collateral material for targeted businesses with goal of recruiting desired tenants into existing commercial centers and those underway ¶ 1 Deleted: various community events and programs Deleted: e g City Picnic, Community Concert, and Deleted: Created and mailed spring postcard to La Quinta residents announcing springtime events in the City i Deleted: R i Deleted: s Deleted: ere secured j, Deleted: s were Deleted: and { Deleted: and in r Deleted: 7 Deleted: and televised ,n December 2005 Deleted: an Fox Sports Network throughout Southern California. Deleted: Waiting on official word for the 2007 Bob Hope Chrysler Classic before collateral matonal is printed. Deleted: Issued press releases on various SilverRock items of interest i Deleted: May 16, 2006_ 0001218 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 17 be-part_of.the_2008 Bob Hope Chrysler Classic. ThJs accomplishment will be a valuable component in promoting SilverRock. 2007-08 Implementation Activities and Target Areas The City's economic development initiatives have attracted major anchor retailers to the Highway 111 corridor, developed the Arnold Palmer Classic golf course at SilverRock Resort, and ,oncluded_negotiations with ADD SilverRock. LLC or the develo ment or boutique hotel, resort hotel, and resort retail village at SilverRock Resort. During 200,7- 08, the Economic Development focus will entail: • Working with Highway 111 Corridor property owners to facilitate building and site reuse opportunities to accommodate evolving retail trends and the reuse and/or expansion of existing retail facilities and auto dealers. • Exploring opportunities to develop a mixed -use "lifestyle' center that combines entertainment venues with retail and residential uses, in the Highway Ill Corridor; • Completing and implementing the development programs for the boutique and resort hotels at SilverRock Resort; • Designing the permanent clubhouse and the second golf course at SilverRock Resort; • Exploring opportunities to develop urban infill residential uses in or near the Village to increase demand for the commercial and office uses; and • Work with_�roperty__owners at Washington_ and Fred Waring_to_deyalop commercial and office projects. • Evaluating the retail demand potential and designating additional property to accommodate new retail centers in Planning Areas 1 and 2. j Deleted: 6 { Deleted: 7 Deleted: initiated 1 Deleted: Destination Development Company(DDC) .1 Deleted: regarding Deleted: the Deleted: properties - Deleted: 6 ' Deleted: 7 The Redevelopment Agency's prime focuses will be to: (1) facilitate the development of the boutique and resort hotels at SilverRock Resort; and (2) to initiate the design activities for the permanent clubhouse and second golf course. In order to insure a timely opening of the second course, the Agency will initiate course design and site planning activities as part of its 0..07-08 capital improvement efforts. i, Deleted:2006-07 Another Agency focus will be to generate opportunities to facilitate urban infill development in and adjacent to the Village. Market research and discussions with the development community indicate that the current land values combined with current parking requirements limit the economic feasibility of residential development. The Agency may need to address this potential imbalance by facilitating land purchase and Deleted: May 16, 2006 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA �V,a•ch 70 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 18 sale transactions, and by working with the City to explore on- and off -site parking alternatives. During the past V years the City's economic development efforts have generated a i, Deleted: 1 majority of the retail uses that populate the Highway 111 Corridor. This effort established the Corridor as a prime regional retail center. However, La Quinta residents have voiced the desire to have new pedestrian oriented entertainment venues in La Quinta. Given the regional draw of the Highway 111 Corridor, locating a mixed use lifestyle center in the Corridor would be appropriate. A lifestyle center typically includes ,restaurants, coffeehouses, bookstores, a health club, and urban residential uses. ',Deleted: movie theaters, However, the limited vacant land opportunities within the Corridor may limit to City's opportunities. An equally important City economic development initiative involves planning for future retail development to serve future growth in Sphere of Influence Planning Areas 1 and 2. Initial development and population projections indicate that these Planning Areas may accommodate from 60,000 to 99,900 residents. Given the distant location from the existing commercial centers within the City, 500,000 to 600,000 leasable square feet of local -serving commercial development could be supported in this area at buildout. As part of the City's annexation strategic planning activities slated for 2007-0i4 that will ,Deleted:6 focus on Planning Areas 1 and 2, additional analysis of the retail potential will be I Deleted:7 conducted. Further, given the residential emphasis of the current land use policies that govern development in these Planning Areas combined with the fact that a majority of this property is located in a Redevelopment Project Area under the jurisdiction of Riverside County, the City would gain limited operations revenue from annexing this area. As part of the City's strategic planning effort, new revenue sources must be identified to insure that municipal service costs associated with these Planning Areas are funded by municipal revenues generated within these Planning Areas. Highway 111 Corridor Activities to Accomplish in a Continue to market Highway 111 corridor f Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.31" 2007-0, : development opportunities to retail, Deleted:6 hospitality and family Deleted: r restaurant/entertainment developers and operators in conjunction with property owners. a Market Highway 111 corridor development opportunities to auto dealers, and assist with retention and expansion efforts. Deleted: Monitor the implementation of the Disposition and Development Agreement to ensure timely a completion of hotel, restaurant, ---— -- medical office and residential development on the a Facilitate building and site reuse MilesMashinglon property opportunities to accommodate evolving I Deleted: May 16. 2006 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA !N'e ch pD aL)T ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 19 retail trends and the reuse and/or expansion of existing retail facilities. • Explore opportunities to locate a mixed -use "lifestyle" center that combines entertainment venues with retail and residential uses in the Highway 111 Corridor. Washington Street Corridor Activities to Accomplish in 2007-08: Continue to work with Pimerty__o_wners to develo ret it c_ommPrciai general office and medical office uses. This includes Phase 1 of Eisenhower Medical Center's 196q00- s-quare_foot medical office complex. The Village Activities to Accomplish in • Continue manitorin parking capacity and 200Z-Q: location studies that identify current and future parking demand, and the means and locations to accommodate jjture ap rkinq demands. Explore opportunities to develop urban infill residential uses in or near the Village to increase demand for the commercial and office uses. Continue to explore commercial retail development opportunities. • date the Village design Guidelines General Plan policies Zonin Codes and ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA Ve¢ h 70 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.6" Hanging: 0.15" Deleted: ¶ - - The Village Formatted: Body Text { Deleted: elude Deleted: 6 Deleted: 7 j, Deleted: these Deleted: Initiateu Imported: Initiate u i Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Deleted: to V Deleted: May 16, 2006 000131 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 20 consider a_strategic plan. Annexation Feasibility Activities to Accomplish in Develop an annexation strategic plan that , ; Deleted: s 20Q7-1L£3: will generate land use and fiscal Deleted:7 recommendations that guide future Planning Area 1 and 2 annexations. • Continue efforts with the County of Riverside Deleted: work to identify how the City may assume some of the current redevelopment authority and revenue as Planning Area 1 and 2 properties are annexed into the City of La Quinta. • Evaluate the use of non -property tax based revenue vehicles in order to accommodate annexation requests. • Evaluate the retail demand potential and designate additional property to accommodate new retail centers in Planning Areas 1 and 2. ResortlHospitality Opportunities Activities to Accomplish in • IrnolemPnt and��he Disposition and {Deleted: Enter 2007-0$: Development Agreement and Developrnegt Deleted: into a ..... Agreement with DD _SilverRock. LLC Deleted:6 boutique hotel resort hotel casitas. and Deleted: 7 - retail development withinSllverROck Resort. _ Deleted: a Destmatlon Development Company (Doc) • �OOrdlnatE alld faCllltatB fhE dEVBi(7pmEnt Deleted: for proCPSS for the bOUtIgUP hotel at SIIVerROCk Deleted: Complete and implement Resort. the development programs for the boutique and resort hotels • Solicit proposals from landowners and j Deleted: <#>Begm conceptual developers to jointly develop additional resort p f y p planning for the retail component of SilverRock Resort-¶ and hospitality uses throughout the City. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC CITY OF LA QUINTA Kwch 202007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Deleted: May 16, 2006 _ _ __ _ 0001.3� IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 21 Recreation Opportunities Activities to Accomplish in 2007-Q@: Housing • Initiate the site planning and facilities design processes for the permanent clubhouse, and the second golf course at SilverRock Resort. • Implement _ new__ Parks Arid Recreation Master Plan Explore jand_. acquisition__ opportunities _to provide additional park facilities. .� Deleted: 6 Deleted:7 -------- nip Activities to Accomplish in • ,Complete the construction sale and Deleted:lnitiate and complete site '-------" improvement and home consVuclicn 200Z-Q: occupancy of the Vista Dunes Courtyard achvitiesatVista Dunes Homes Secure Leadership in Energy and ;Deleted: s Environmental Design (LEED) certification Deleted:? for all 80 homes. t_ -- • Purchase and reserve additional property for future affordable housing development. • Complete site planninq activities_ for: • Washington Street Apartments and adioining property. • Highway 111/Dune Palms Road property. • Dune Palms RoadNVestward Ho properties. • Initiate mixed use development site planning activities for City owned property located at Avenue 52 between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive. Identify rehabilitation and/or redevelopment opportunities involving existing multi -family residential units. • Monitor the implementation of the Affordable ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC CITY OF I.A QUINTA rV8-ph 20 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, Deleted: Explore the feasibility of rehabditat ng or redeveloping the remaming monde home park within the community. { Deleted: May 1 fi _2006 ni�n ` IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 22 Housing Agreement with Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC) for the land sale and development of 218 affordable multi- family rental dwellings at the Dune Palms Road/Avenue 48 property. • Sell additional units in the La Quinta Housing Program to very low-income households. Marketing Activities to Accomplish in General City Marketing 2007 0. e Continue to run out -of -market City 30- second spot in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. • Continue print "play, stay, shop, and dine' advertising in newspapers such as Los Angeles Times„The Desert Su any d Desert Entertainer. • Continue advertising in various program guides and publications such as: International Council of Shopping Centers, and Bob Hope Chrysler Classic,, • Continue to advertise in Palm Springs Life (October "Cities" Issue and September hotel issue). • Continue to participate in trade shows and special events, e.g. ICSC, BizNet, City picnic, • Maintain a contingency account for unique advertising opportunities. Deleted:6 Deleted: 7 Deleted: Creats new television spots to promote new shoppiniand dining with context of City's 25 anniversary ¶ - - Deleted: and Deletetl: I Deleted: Undertake parallel shop/dine/25" anniversary campaign via 2dio and publications such as LO Magazine and The Desert Sun ¶ <#>Explore new City websde promotion in conjunction with City's 25" anniversary ¶ { Deleted:, Deleted: andexplore CVA co-ops Deleted: , community concert • Continue public relations opportunities ,-y {Deleted_ with issujng of press releases or anizin special Deleted: ance events, and taking advantage of _media Deleted: wnh focus en 2s" opportunities (e q Interviews television `anniversary sh�wsj. • Continue to produce a City calendar as a,gift (Deleted: P and communication piece for La Quinta I Deleted: May 16, 2006 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA Va.ch 20 ppp7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 01;34 IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEW INITIATIVES PAGE 23 residents. • Continue to produce a quarterly City Report newsletter for La Quinta residents. Community Ser_y_ices Market • Continue_to produce _quarterly _recreational brochure to promote special programs and classes. Arnold Palmer Classic Course Marketing • Continue rotator billboards and ensure readability. e Take full advantage of being a home course of the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic in the 2007-2008 rnarketingand_advgrtisin Ian. • Print Advertising — advertise in golf publications such as Desert Golf Magazine and Palm Springs Life, and The Desert Sun. • Continue research and implement public relations opportunities with positive messages, e.g., national recognition by Golf Magazine. • Advertise in non -golf publications, e.g., in- flight magazines. • Contract professional services for maintenance of SilverRock website. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA QUINTA Na,. h 702007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN _Deleted: P Deleted: <#>Complete redesign of City Pages in the Gem (Chamber monthly publication) ¶ <#>Create material to promote Community services events, such as post cards and posters ¶ Deleted: Create 25°' Year Anniversary Committee.¶ Design 25" Year Anniversary Logo ¶ Deleted: Explore possibility of producing new 30-second TV spot to air locally and nationally Deleted: May 16, 2006 +�Ulja i'Exhibit III 2007-0 i conomic Development Plan Strategies and Tasks to Stimulate Private Investment in La Quinta L)_bc igscrtCd Ill tidal_ dUCIIMIcut. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. CITY OF LA OUINTA j,iecl> 20- 2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Deleted:6 i Deleted: 7 Deleted: May 16, 2006 � ' 3 t7 t.q iJ �? � EXHIBIT B Fcoraornics Research Assoriates OVERVIEW ANALYSIS OF MARKET OPPORTUNITIES CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APRIL 2006 ERA PROJECT NO. 16469 t nF 30 Wt �., t, r,, 4,""!'av a,"d .. } "> A %,A,,,, CA 8407' �. ss nm 9eia�: sari t..an rt„o ..au 4��„�u V i;hlraet �` WU.e h}ra tt<o0 Rx[' iio�M1 l`c,n t_uxna or. The City of La Quinta is in the process of updating its 2006-2007 Economic Development Plan which sets forth objectives, strategies, and initiatives in order to shape future City development and ensure adequate services and facilities for City residents and visitors. The identification and analysis of market opportunities and constraints is an integral part of the Economic Development Plan. Economics Research Associates (ERA) was retained by the City to assist in evaluating a range of economic and real estate market issues which will help shape the plan in the near- and mid-term. In addition to providing an analysis of socioeconomic and demographic forces which will influence development intensity and patterns in the City and other parts of the Coachella Valley, ERA's analysis focuses on market conditions and development opportunities relative to four specific project • Highway I I I Commercial Corridor • Downtown Village • SilverRock Resort • Sphere of Influence Annexation Each of these areas is addressed in the summary of findings with documentation and analysis contained in the full report. Economics Research Associates CYry of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 1 h,N� i } if 1 1 ' i -0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Key findings and conclusions regarding market opportunities relative to the targeted project areas within the City of La Quinta are summarized below. DemoaratAics • The Coachella Valley year-round population has expanded significantly since 1990 at a rate of about 3.6 percent compared with overall state population growth of 1.3 percent per year over the same period. Permanent population in the City of La Quinta has increased more rapidly over this period as well. Between 1990 and 2000, permanent population increased in the City by over 12,000 (7.8% annual rate); another 12,000 population has been added since 2000 (8.8% annual rate). La Quinta's share of total Coachella Valley population has increased from 4.8 percent in 1990 to 7.4 percent in 2000, and 9.2 percent presently. Coachella La Quinta East Valley Valley Population 1990 11,200 114,300 230,500 2000 23,700 164,700 318,100 2005 36,100 204,300 391,600 2010 45,000 276,000 478,500 2020 54,000 403,000 645,500 Average Annual Growth 1990-2000 1,250 5,040 8,760 2000-2005 2,480 7,920 14,700 2005-2010 1,780 14,340 17,380 2010-2020 1,900 12,700 16,500 Average Annual Growth Rate 1990-2000 7.8% 3.7% 3.3% 2000-2005 8.8% 4.4% 4.2% 2005-2010 4.5% 6.2% 4.1% 2010-2020 3.6% 3.9% 3.0% • For purposes of this study, the "East Valley" consists of the region generally extending east of Highway 74 to Coachella, and includes all of the City of La Quinta, Indio, Coachella, Indian Wells, portions of Palm Desert, and unincorporated zones. Residential and visitor activity in this area provides market support for many businesses and services in the City of La Quinta. Substantial growth has occurred and is expected to continue in this area. Population in the Economics Research Associates ury of t,a Lumm P ERA No. 16469 ,age 2 U 0( defined East Valley increased from 164,700 in 2000 to 204,300 presently, such that the area has accounted for approximately 55 percent of the total growth in the Coachella Valley over the past five years. • Permanent population in the Coachella Valley is projected to continue to increase at a 4.1 percent average annual rate over the next five years, slowing to about 3.0 percent between 2010 and 2020. The East Valley area population, which includes the City of La Quinta potential annexation area, is forecast to increase from 204,300 in 2005 to 276,000 in 2010, and 403,000 by 2020. The average growth of about 13,000 population per year will represent 80 percent percent of the total valley's growth over the next 15 years. • La Quinta's population growth will largely depend on annexation actions. Assuming extensive annexation of unincorporated County property lying southeast of the City would result in population increasing from 36,100 currently to 114,000 by 2020 and 160,500 at buildout. City of La Quinta Population Existing Annexation Year Boundaries Area Total 2005 36,100 6,000 42,100 2010 45,000 15,000 60,000 2020 54,000 60,000 114,000 Buildout 60,600 99,900 160,500 • The Coachella Valley and La Quinta also have large seasonal population. During the prime season of January -April, peak seasonal population has grown at a much more modest rate. Coachella Year La Quinta East Valley Valley 1994 8,700 46,800 103,500 2000 11,300 57,200 117,200 2004 13,900 64,500 127,900 2010 17,000 77,000 145,700 2020 21,700 98,500 177,600 Growth of seasonal population is expected to increase at a more modest pace than permanent population. While the aging baby boom generation will continue to create demand for second home product, this growth in the Coachella Valley is Economics Rm.nh Associates ury of La Llama 3 ERA No. 16469 Page , partially offset by conversion of pre -retirement second homes to primary residents by retiring households. • In general, the Coachella Valley and City of La Quinta resident age profile reflects a somewhat older population compared with the statewide distribution: Percentage Distribution Coachella Age Cohort La Quinta Valley California Under 19 31% 27% 30% 19-54 46% 48% 50% 55-64 10% 9% 9% Over65 13a/a 16% 11% Total 100% 100% 100% Median Age 36.4 37.3 33.8 • La Quinta permanent residents are more affluent, while east Coachella Valley residents in general are slightly less so that statewide norms: Annual Household Distribution Household Income La Quinta East Valley California Under$25,000 18% 28% 21% $ 25,000- 49,999 27% 30% 24% $ 50,000- 99,999 34% 27% 31% $100,000-149,999 11% 8% 14% $150,000-199,999 4% 3% 5% Over $200,000 6% 4% 5% Total 100% 100% 100% Median Household Income $61,480 $47,924 $54,300 • Residential units authorized by building permits in La Quinta since 1990 are as follows: Average Annual Units Permitted Period Single Multiple Total 1991-1995 395 --- 395 1990-2000 1,059 78 1,137 2001-2005 1,070 174 1,244 The building permit activity is consistent with population growth. About 70 percent of the new units developed over the past five years serve as primary residences. Economics Research Associates GO of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 4 0U 4 42, • La Quinta retail sales activity has soared with the increase in commercial inventory within the City: La Quinta Retail Sales (millions) Current Constant Year Dollars 2005 Dollars) 2001 $297.9 $322.4 2002 327.8 355.6 2003 389.4 413.7 2004 510.9 527.1 2005 669.3 669.3 'Current dollars adjusted to 2005 dollars applying U.S. Consumer Price Index — all urban consumers. SilverRock Resort Golf Course The first 18-hole SilverRock championship golf course is now in its second year of operation. Course performance in its first year was reasonably favorable in light of some delays in opening resulting largely from unusually heavy winter rain and course drainage problems, which have since been rectified. Golf play in the first quarter of 2006 has been at or slightly above budget, with expectations that the course will generate about 35,000 rounds for the 2005-2006 fiscal year. At this level, the course will approach, although remain somewhat below the operating breakeven point by about $500,000 per year. Based on the current operating structure and policies, the course will reach operating breakeven at about 40,000 annual rounds, or about 5,000 more than 2005-2006 play. It is expected that play in fiscal 2006-2007 will total about 38,000 rounds, such that modest subsidies will continue to be required, with breakeven not reached until the initial complement of overnight accommodations at SilverRock is on-line. Annual resident play in 2005-2006 will total approximately 11,000 rounds, or about 30 percent of total play. This level of resident play is consistent with pre -development planning projections (ERA original estimates based on 12,000 resident rounds). Residents are offered discounted play at $55 per round compared with peak season rates of $145 Economics Research Associates City of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Ea $" ri 00 14 3 weekdays and $160 weekends, but residents cannot book tee times more than three days in advance. Elimination of the resident discount rate would increase the average greens fee, but the higher rate would result in reduced play such that the net financial benefits would be nominally positive. The course has been operating from the temporary Ahmanson House clubhouse. While this clubhouse clearly is suboptimal in terms of size, location, and content, it has satisfactorily accommodated golfers' needs until a permanent clubhouse is constructed. Plans for the resort element have progressed with expectations that a DDA between the City and developer, Lowe Enterprises, will be finalized by mid-2006. The plan effectively has evolved into a three-phase program: Phase I — Doe Bone • 162 condominium hotel units (210 keys) • Meeting and conference facilities (10,000 square feet) • Restaurant (8,000 square feet) • Spa (8,000 square feet) Phase II — Resort/Second Hotel • 90 core hotel rooms (resort owned) 180 condominium hotel units (200 keys) • Meeting and conference space (20,000 square feet) • Condominium hotel/fractionals — 90 units (91 keys) • Retail complex (75,000 square feet) Phase III — Resort Casitas • Overnight accommodations (150-200 keys) Phase I The first phase of overnight accommodations will be developed and marketed as a condominium hotel. The unit design, features, and market orientation is consistent with very high participation in a rental program. Within the context of Securities and Exchanges Commission regulations regarding real estate "securities," a transient occupancy in -lieu fee should ensure City tax receipts with Economics Research Associates City of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 6 00 C) I��_� the condominium hotel product. Based on the present planning, first occupancy is scheduled to occur in fall of 2008. • The first phase of accommodations (162 units — 210 keys) should generate about 8,000 annual rounds of golf at SilverRock, assuming 70 percent annual occupancy and a .15 golf -to -room -night generation ratio. The existing 18-hole golf course has sufficient capacity to accommodate these additional rounds. • In addition to the golf course, a freestanding dinner house restaurant (250-300 seats), a 10,000-square-foot complement of group conference/meeting rooms, and an 8,000-square-foot spa are proposed. The mix and sizing of these facilities appears appropriate for the first phase overnight accommodations. • Depending on market conditions, sales strategies, and various other factors, it is likely that the 160 Phase I units may require a two-year absorption period. This could affect somewhat the timing of the Phase II resort hotel. • Construction of the permanent clubhouse — a 16,000-square-foot facility, excluding cart storage — is scheduled concurrently with the first phase resort element. One perspective is that this timing would signal the strong commitment of the City to prospective Phase I unit buyers. Development of the clubhouse also would benefit the golf course through enhancing the overall golf experience. • The alternative to developing the clubhouse in Phase I is to defer its construction so as to open concurrently with Phase II, at the same time the resort hotel and second golf course open. While the additional expenses related to operating a permanent clubhouse should be recovered through additional net operating revenues, delaying the clubhouse opening would postpone the need for the extensive capital commitment related to the permanent clubhouse. Moreover, the cost of operating the Ahmanson House, once the permanent clubhouse is opened, will become an added burden. • The second phase of overnight accommodations will represent the largest concentration of resort facilities at SilverRock including overnight accommodations with about 380 keys. These keys will consist of a small conventional resort -owned core of about 90 hotel rooms, 180 condominium hotel units (200 keys), and a lower density 90-unit casita product (91 keys) which could be marketed as whole ownership condominium hotel units or an interval ownership product such as fractional interests. Economics Research Associates ERA No. 16469 City ojLa Quinta Page 7 00ni It j • Development of the second 18-hole golf course would be concurrent with Phase II overnight accommodations. This timing is appropriate as the additional capacity will be needed when the additional room inventory is available for occupancy. Depending on the final mix of product, the 380 keys should generate 10,000 to 15,000 additional rounds of golf annually at SilverRock. • At present, the SilverRock developer anticipates the start of Phase II will trail Phase I by about 6 to 12 months. The timing of Phase II will, in large part, be determined by the pace of absorption in Phase I. If absorption of Phase I occurs at 80 to 100 units per year (two-year absorption period), Phase II may be delayed by 18 to 24 months. However, the core of 90 resort -owned conventional hotel rooms in Phase II could be initiated prior to completion of Phase I, with the condominium hotel sales effort coordinated with Phase I performance. • Consideration has been given to development of a golf training center/academy on the north end of the golf practice range. The primary benefit accruing to SilverRock from the presence of a training center/academy is image enhancement and national exposure in the marketplace, both which should indirectly benefit the golf course and the resort operations. The development is not substantially dependent on the resort for market support nor will it directly generate a large number of room -nights. As such, the timing of development of a training center/academy should be influenced by available opportunities and their related economic terms, and not necessarily limited to the timing of other elements of the project. • A retail/entertainment center on a seven -acre site directly south of the resort hotel is to be developed as part of Phase II. The preliminary development program calls for about 55,000 square feet of leasable floor area on the ground floor, and 20,000 square feet on the second level. • Based on the number of keys and type and mix of product in Phases I and II, the experience at similar resort projects suggests that SilverRock onsite overnight visitor demand will support about 25,000 square feet of retail at the project (about 40 square feet per key), or about 45 percent of the ground floor retail. • The balance of support for the retail center will derive from residents and visitors in La Quinta and other East Valley communities. The overall size of the center (55,000 square feet of ground floor retail) is probably the minimum scale Economics Research Associates ERA No. 16469 of La Quinta Page 8 necessary to create a destination, but it is doubtful that, in this location, the center would be of much greater size. Nonetheless, flexibility to accommodate expansion by 20,000 to 25,000 square feet would appear reasonable and appropriate. • Restaurants will serve as the anchor tenants for the center, and probably should account for 50 to 60 percent of the ground floor space (4-5 restaurants). The second level would likely be occupied by office tenants or other non -retail tenants. A small number of second level rental apartments would be supportable to the extent that demand for second level space is deficient. • The success of a retail center will require relatively intense programming in order to create a destination. The ambiance created by the linear lake and boardwalk feature, architectural theming, and entertainment programming/events at the center should be sufficient to market the space to tenants. • Design and theming will be critically important. A village atmosphere with a pedestrian orientation is necessary, as is linking the development to the water. The need to anchor the center with strong food and beverage tenants cannot be overstated. • It also will be important to establish an entity which is funded from tenant sales and the onsite hotels (including condo hotels) to market the retail. An annual budget in the range of $300,000 or more should be anticipated. An ongoing financial/marketing commitment to ensure the viability of the retail complex beyond the real estate sales period is necessary as this will improve hotel rental which in turn produces transient occupancy tax revenue. In addition to tenant and transient occupancy assessments, a small real estate transfer fee (new and resale) could represent a partial funding mechanism for marketing funds. • The experience of similar resort -oriented retail suggests that it may be necessary to provide economic assistance in the early phase of tenant leasing. This assistance could be in the form of free rent for an extended period, larger than normal tenant improvement allowances, and rent relief until threshold tenant sales levels are achieved. • Restaurant construction allowances of $150 per square foot (tenant funds all improvements) with annual rents per square foot of $24 triple -net, and retail shop rents of $30 triple -net with $20 to $30 tenant improvement allowances appear Economics Research Associates City of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 9 OOU47 supportable. Overall, sales volumes of $350 to $400 per square foot per year are expected. • Phase III development at SilverRock is largely and purposely undefined at present. It involves the approximate 10 acres south of the retail village, and will likely accommodate additional overnight facilities. The type of product and market orientation will be heavily influenced by the experience gained in the Phase I and 11 development. Hiehwav 111 Commercial Corridor • Within the City of La Quinta, the Highway I I I corridor generally extends from Washington Street to Jefferson Street, and serves as the primary commercial retail core area serving City residents/visitors and others located in the eastern Coachella Valley. • The Highway I I I corridor, extending from just west of Washington Street on the west to Jefferson Street on the east, is about 2.0 miles in length. Property depth ranges from about 500 to 1,200 feet on the north side and from 700 to 2,500 feet on the south side of Highway 111. The corridor contains approximately 470 acres of developable property, 185 acres on the north and about 285 acres on the south side of the highway, most of which has been developed. • As of March 2006, the level of commercial development in the corridor totals about 2.7 million square feet, including about 500,000 square feet under construction. Gross Leasable Area (thousands of square feet) Office/ Institutional/ Retail Other Total Existing 1,935 265 2,200 Under Construction 475 25 500 Total 2,410 290 2,700 • Over the past three years, approximately 1.2 million square feet of commercial development has been added to the Highway III corridor, increasing the inventory from 1.5 million in 2003 to 2.7 million square feet of gross leasable area currently. Most of this expansion relates to the opening or under Economics Research Associates City of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 10 construction big box and general merchandise tenants including Target, Wal- Mart, Sam's Club, Costco, and other sub -regional tenants. This inventory expansion, by any measure, has been extraordinary. • The rapid development of the La Quinta Highway I I I corridor is manifest in retail sales activity within the City, which has increased 72 percent over the past two years: Taxable Retail Sales Year (millions) 2003 $389.4 2004 510.9 2005 669.3 • In addition to the 500,000 square feet under construction, the capacity of the corridor, based on available remaining undeveloped parcels, is estimated as follows: Gross Leasable Area Land Area (thousands of (acres) square feet) Vacant Parcels 40 350 Existing Auto Dealerships 10 150 Other Vacant Auto Center 35 500 Total 85 1,000 • As noted, the capacity is indicated based on development of only vacant parcels as well as a broader scenario which would involve relocation and redevelopment of existing auto -related uses. Clearly, the FARs on undeveloped properties could be increased depending on the types of uses and, in particular, the degree of structured versus surface parking. Under the most aggressive scenario, assuming redevelopment of existing auto -related uses, the Highway III corridor can accommodate an additional 1.0 million square feet of development. Maintaining all of the auto -related uses would reduce this future capacity to about 350,000 square feet. • East of Jefferson Street, within the City of Indio, there are extensive opportunities to develop commercial uses. This stretch of highway has numerous large-scale vacant properties. Between Jefferson Street and Monroe Street, there are Economics Research Associates City of La Qainta ERA No. 16469 Page it 00i'T approximately 200 acres of developable vacant property and substantial under - improved properties which will ultimately be redeveloped. This Indio Highway I I I corridor can accommodate in excess of three million square feet of future development at typical commercial floor area ratios. • Retail rental rates for anchor tenants currently are in the $14 to $18 per square foot per year range, triple -net, while smaller tenant space rents range more widely from $20 to $27 per square foot per year, triple -net, averaging about $22.00 in anchored centers. These rents generally support land values of $12 to $15 per square foot based on typical retail FARs of .2 to .25. Land sales of larger sites have transacted in this range, with smaller sites commanding much higher prices depending on their locational characteristics. • In general, the commercial development market has been very efficient and fluid in initiating and completing significant levels of project development. Within the past several years, several key objectives were achieved in the corridor: — The inventory of commercial space has nearly doubled since 2003 from 1.5 million to 2.7 million square feet. — The eastern end of the corridor has been successfully anchored with the new 300,000-square-foot Costco/Komar Desert Center and other development. — The corridor has emerged as a major sub -regional center serving the east Coachella Valley. Numerous big -box and other key national retail tenants have been attracted to the corridor, fulfilling most of the retail needs of the area. • Based on projected population growth in La Quinta's East Valley Service Area, projected to average 10,000 to 12,000 per year over the next 15 years, another 4.5 million square feet of commercial retail leasable area will be required, or about 300,000 square feet per year. As noted above, La Quinta's Highway I I I corridor has the capacity to accommodate only a small fraction of this development, with much of the future development likely to be funneled to the stretch of Highway I I I between Jefferson and Monroe in Indio. • There appear to be two areas where City economic development participation may be necessary and effective — retention of existing auto uses and development of an entertainment -oriented center. • The La Quinta auto center located on the south side of Highway III between Adams Street and Auto Center Drive currently has two dealerships, with the Economics Research Associates ERA No. 16469 of La Quinta Page 12 OUt?1_0ki original plans for the center to host as many as nine dealerships. The two existing dealerships occupy about 10 acres with about 1,200 feet of prime Highway 111 frontage. Remaining vacant parcels designated for auto dealerships, located south of the existing dealerships, total about 35 acres. • As the East Valley has grown, and will continue to grow, viable dealerships need to expand in order to maintain their market share and satisfy manufacturer performance mandates. Both Tone Nissan and Champion Cadillac have expansion requirements. While considering the option to relocate, the Nissan dealership, which has been successful at the existing location, has expressed a preference to remain on Highway 111. • Because of very high gross taxable sales volume, the sales tax generation of auto dealerships is extremely beneficial to the City. A typical dealership will generate three to five times as much sales tax as traditional retail uses occupying the same property. Thus, it is appropriate for the City to provide assistance in facilitating the retention and/or expansion of the existing dealerships, or in securing new dealerships. • While assistance with the retaining dealerships is warranted, the City remains vulnerable to auto dealership relocation. The City needs to be prepared to address potential relocation issues, and potential redevelopment of portions of the Auto Center property with retail/commercial office development. • The Coachella Valley currently has a total of 87 movie screens contained in nine theatres, yielding an overall ratio of about 4,600 permanent population per screen, about one-half the norm. Even considering the market support derived from seasonal residents and area visitors, the overall Coachella Valley market is significantly over -supplied. • The East Valley, however, appears to be under -served, with only the eight -screen Indio Metro 8 located east of the Century 15 at The River at Rancho Mirage in Rancho Mirage and the 10-screen Cinemas Palme d'Or in Palm Desert, both more than five miles west of Washington Street. The River at Rancho Mirage, a 12- screen state-of-the-art theatre complex, has been extremely successful with gross annual ticket sales substantially above the industry average of $260,000 per screen. All of the other theatre complexes in the Coachella Valley, however, operate at a small fraction of the industry average per screen. The Indio Metro 8, Economics Research Associates ury of ca Lamm ERA No. 16469 Page 13 0ON :�l for example, historically has generated just over one-half the industry average ticket sales revenue per screen. • The present state of the motion picture and theatre industry is very fragile. The strong performance of motion picture exhibitors in the 1990s resulted in an extraordinary expansion of the number of movie screens. Between 1995 and 2000, when U.S. theatre admissions increased 12 percent, the number of cinema screens increased by more than 35 percent. This over -building, combined with modest increases in demand, created extreme financial hardship for the industry's exhibitors, resulting in a series of bankruptcies, theatre closings, and industry consolidation. • Exacerbating the industry's problems has been stagnant growth in theatre attendance. Between 1998 and 2005, theatre attendance has remained relatively unchanged at about 1.5 billion ticket sales. Numerous factors for this stagnant growth are cited, including claims of atypical poor feature film product, high ticket pricing and increased competition from home theatre, interactive cable networks, and access to first run movies via satellite or cable systems. • There also are issues dealing with the film distribution and revenue sharing between the distributors and exhibitors. With limited quality product, competing entertainment mediums, and sharp declines in per screen attendance, exhibitors have been attempting to restructure revenue sharing with the distributors, with uncertain results at this time. • The movie theatre industry is highly competitive, particularly in the licensing of films and selecting new theatre sites. Factors influencing film licensing include seating capacity, theatre location and quality, projection and sound equipment quality, licensing terms, and the exhibitor's willingness and ability to promote the films. • While licensing and theatre attendance is affected by numerous variables, probably the most misunderstood, yet most important, factor is "film zones." A film zone is simply a geographic area determined by both the various film distribution companies and theatre operators (exhibition companies). Generally, studios only release copies of a film to a single exhibitor within a zone. Depending on demographic characteristics of a given area and the locations of all exhibitors in the area, theatres will either have a captive zone or a split zone. In Economics Research Associates city o/ La yumm ERA No. 16469 Page 14 captive, or free, zones, the studio and the exhibitor are free to negotiate the terms of exhibit each film and, if terms are agreed upon, the exhibitor will rent the film. In a split zone, the studio will alternate between the exhibitors within the zone. Although this system is designed to give each exhibitor an equal share of revenues from any given studio, the success of each film and the capacity of the exhibitors within the market often leads to a less than even split in annual revenues when two exhibitors share a zone. • The cost of development, given the new stadium seating design and digital production technology also has increased markedly, such that state-of-the-art theatres turnkey costs, excluding land, total about $1.2 to $1.4 million per screen ($300 to $400 per square foot). The rate of development of new movie theatres has declined sharply in the past five years. Nonetheless, some new development is occurring, although exhibitors are being very cautious and selective. • Despite the overall over -supply and industry difficulties, one new multi-plex movie theatre complex (16 screens) is supportable in the east Coachella Valley at this time, with a second not supportable for at least five and perhaps 10 years. The La Quinta Highway III corridor is an extremely attractive location. A proposed 18-screen theatre was announced at Monroe and 42nd Street in Indio as part of a proposed 97-acre large-scale regional commercial center in mid-2005. It is unclear whether this project will move forward in the near term. Assuming the theatre complex in Indio does not proceed in a timely manner, an opportunity would be available in La Quinta. Such a project would most likely require substantial financial assistance. Theatres have very high parking ratios which often undermine the economics of movie theatre development. Thus, economic assistance most often occurs in the form of parking development. In cases where parking can be shared with other users, like office development, the cost is reduced. • The Highway I I I corridor would be more conducive to a mixed -use "lifestyle" movie theatre environment, with restaurants, coffee houses, bookstore, athletic club, health food store, wellness/spa center, and other entertainment -oriented tenants. Developers of movie -anchored complexes generally desire 15 to 20 acres or more, for such development, depending on the size of the project and the parking configuration. A 16-screen theatre would require at least 750 parking spaces. Economics Research Associates City of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 15 0001 153 La Ouinta Commercial Village • The La Quinta Commercial Village (the Village) is a designated commercial zone with gross land area of about 120 acres. Within this area, there are 45 individual legal parcels with a combined 55 to 60 acres of undeveloped, vacant land. • The original platting of the property comprising the Village is very problematic as most of the individual parcels are very small making it difficult to develop projects of any scale. Moreover, ownership is very fragmented with about 40 individual owners controlling the 45 vacant parcels. • The most significant commercial project developed in the last several years is Old Town. The first phase 55,000-square-foot two -level retail complex opened in 2003 and is fully leased. A 65,000-square-foot second phase is under construction. The performance of the center, anchored by three restaurants, reportedly is mixed. • The downtown area historically has provided convenience shopping and services for local residents. Old Town has attempted to create a more destination -oriented retail experience with mixed success. • Asking rents in the Village for well -located retail space reportedly are in the $20 per square foot (NNN) range for restaurants and $24 for smaller tenant shop space, and office space leases for $20 to $22 per square foot per year on a gross basis. Rents at this level, given typical .2 to .25 retail FARs, support $12 to $15 per square foot land values. At higher FARs (.4-.5), land values in the $20 range are supportable. • The limited land transactions involving sizable parcels suitable for commercial development have occurred at $10 to $12 per square foot, with current transactions being negotiated at $15 to $20 per square foot. The smaller .5- to 1.0-acre sites in downtown La Quinta have sold at significantly higher values of $40 per square foot or more, and asking prices of more than double this are being quoted in the marketplace. • The Village commercial area faces numerous challenges including, although not limited to, the following: — Downtown La Quinta has a relatively small market area with only 8,800 population within a one- and 26,000 within a five -mile radius, or about 1,000 Economics Research Amociales City of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 16 00 15)4 population per square mile. This population density compares with typical suburban densities of 3,000 to 4,000 population per square mile. — Access is not particularly convenient. Vehicle traffic counts are very low and Washington Street serves to some degree as a barrier. — The land ownership patterns make land assemblage an expensive and difficult process. — The land cost "basis" for many property owners is relatively high at $40+ per square foot, and asking prices for various parcels have been quoted in the $100 per square foot range. While these prices may be justifiable to some investors under atypical circumstances, they are far above levels necessary to support traditional commercial development in this area. — Convenient parking is somewhat limited. Structured parking would mitigate the problem, but land values are well below the level needed to justify the cost of such parking, typically considered in the $30 per square foot range. — For the most part, national retailers have rejected downtown La Quinta as a location for new sites in favor of the Highway 111 corridor. • Given the challenges to creating the scale, synergies, and diversification necessary to establish a viable retail or commercial destination, it may be appropriate to radically shift the planning strategy for the Village commercial area. A development program which allows for and encourages residential development at moderate density, say up to 16 to 20 units per acre, while consolidating the commercial core area, appears much more desirable from a market perspective. Two-story wood frame construction over sub -grade parking would be consistent with these residential densities. • A strategy which intensifies residential development opportunities would be beneficial in terms of creating a viable, although much smaller, commercial core, motivating development of vacant parcels in the area without as much public intervention, creating higher land values, and enhancing the overall quality and sustainability of development in the area. • A successful pedestrian -oriented village environment seemingly can only be achieved through inclusion of this moderate -density residential product. Not only do densities at 16 to 20 units per acre provide the scale necessary in producing meaningful commercial support levels, the limited land availability and high cost of remaining undeveloped sites requires increased densities to achieve reasonable economics. Economics Research Associates ERA No. 16469 City Of Quinta Page 17 r C Annexation • The City of La Quinta's General Plan planning area includes existing areas within the City as well as a substantial area east of the City's current boundaries in unincorporated Riverside County. Specifically, this unincorporated area totals about 9,500 acres generally lying between Monroe Street and Harrison Street, south of Avenue 52. This 9,500-acre unincorporated area is under consideration of annexation into the City of La Quinta. • Most of the proposed annexation area, which currently has minimal development, is designated in the General Plan as low density residential yielding approximately four units per acre. At this density, buildout population in the annexation area would likely total nearly 100,000, mostly representing incremental population. Buildout of undeveloped areas remaining within the existing City boundaries would total less than 25,000. • Development dominated by low -density residential uses in the area under consideration for annexation would create a challenging fiscal situation for the City. The ability to balance City revenues with service costs would be exacerbated by the property tax revenue distribution dictated by the designation of most of this are as a Riverside County Redevelopment Zone. • The two most prominent sources of revenue for the City currently are sales tax and transient occupancy tax. The land use plan should incorporate the potential to accommodate these uses within the annexation area, to the extent that there are market opportunities upon which to capitalize. • The potential to capture sales tax and transient occupancy tax are linked to the demand for retail goods and visitor accommodations, respectively. • East Valley permanent population growth is projected to increase from 204,300 presently to 403,000 by 2020. Most of this growth, estimated at about 175,000, will occur east of Washington Street, including the proposed La Quinta annexation area (annexation area population projected to reach 60,000 by 2020, and nearly 100,000 at buildout). • Based on the anticipated growth, demographic considerations, and other factors such as second home and visitor activity, incremental demand for approximately Economics Research Associates City of La Quinta ERA No. 16469 Page 18 5.1 to 6.6 million square feet of commercial development will be generated by development in this area over the next 15-year period: Gross Leasable Area (thousands of sq.ft.) Local Serving Supermarket/Grocery 600- 800 Convenience Goods 350- 450 Other Retail/Services 400- 500 Subtotal 1,350-1,750 Sub -Regional General Merchandise/Discount Stores/Jr. Dept. Stores 600- 750 Super Drug 200- 250 Home Furnishings, Building, Materials 600- 800 Eating and Drinking 450- 550 Other Retail/Services 350- 450 Subtotal 2,200-2,800 Regional Super Discount/Department Stores 600- 800 Ancillary Apparel/Specialty 300- 400 Automotive/Boats, Other Transportation 550- 650 Tourist Specialty 150- 200 Subtotal 1,600-2,050 Total 5,150-6,600 • Support for local -serving commercial development generated by annexation area population over the next 15 years will total about 500,000 to 600,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area by full buildom. All of the commercial space should be located within the annexation area, requiring about 55 to 65 acres of commercial land area. • There is little likelihood that a site within the annexation area would satisfy the location criteria for development of regional -serving commercial uses. Insufficient population in the typical catchment areas, access, and development densities will preclude any center in the annexation area from attracting the needed anchors for regional commercial development. These uses logically will be located along Interstate 10 and California Highway 86, south of I-10. • Many of the same factors will constrain sub -regional commercial development in the annexation area. Most of the sub -regional demand will be satisfied initially by centers along Indio's Highway III corridor and the I-10 corridor, between Jefferson and Jackson streets. As the area develops, sites within the Highway 86 Economics Research Associates City of La L/wnta ERA No. 16469 Page 19 0 0 corridor south of Avenue 48 in Coachella and other areas south will be well positioned to attract sub -regional commercial development. • Depending on development patterns, the highway network, and real estate economics, there appears to be an opportunity to create a sub -regional center of 400,000 to 500,000 leasable square feet in the vicinity of Airport Boulevard and Harrison Street. • The fiscal benefits of visitor accommodations are unmatched by retail or any other land use. A simple rule -of -thumb is one hotel room generates the equivalent of 1,500 square feet of retail development in local tax revenue. The locational criteria for destination hotel development — specifically resorts — does not include the need for excellent regional access or to be within dense population areas. Rather, destinations require attractive sites where natural or man-made features are located. Emphasis on creating a resort environment within the annexation area as a vehicle for fiscal revenue generation appears to have greater merit than attracting major commercial concentrations. Economics Research Associates City of La Quinmta h ERA No. 16469 Page' / n ,) `Y I IT ✓��V�✓�✓/�,y/ //vim/ /a'r4/ s: CF'y OF 1� COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM ITEM TITLE: Discussion of the Draft Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Through 201 1 /2012 Capital Improvement Program RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Direct staff to make appropriate revisions to the draft Fiscal Year 2007/2008 through 201 1 /2012 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The revised CIP will be submitted to the City Council for consideration and approval in April 2007. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: This is an informational report only. Once the CIP is adopted, the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 projects will be incorporated into the annual budget. The CIP was developed in a conservative manner. Projections were formulated utilizing conservative estimates consistent with operating revenues. The projects for the next five years, as shown, are based on considered need and available funding with conservative projections of anticipated collections of Development Impact Fees (500 units per year). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Provided for your consideration is the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) commencing in the Fiscal Year 2007-2008. A copy of the draft CIP is presented to the City Council for review (Attachment 1)• This document is a statement of the City's goals, objectives, and priorities for a five-year CIP and the 'Finan"i - commitments required to accomplish those objectives. The preparation of this document has been a joint effort of the City Manager's Office, Public Works, Finance, Building and Safety, Community Services, Community Development, and City Clerk Departments. The purpose of the CIP is to provide the City with a long-range program for major municipal capital construction projects based on the systematic development of an accompanying financial plan. The CIP is a five-year planning instrument used by the City to identify capital improvement needs and to coordinate financing and timing of those needs in a manner that maximizes benefit to the public. As each annual budget is prepared, additional projects and priority needs are identified and added to the program to maintain a total five-year plan. The first year of the CIP is titled the Capital Budget and is based on existing fund balances and projected revenues. The capital budget is incorporated into the annual City "Operating" Budget, which appropriates funds for specific facilities, equipment and improvements. Projects slated for subsequent years in the program are approved on a planning basis only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are incorporated into the capital budget. The CIP will be updated annually and can be amended at any time based on revenue availability and changes in project priorities. As such, tentative City Council endorsement of the five-year program is desirable for the effective implementation of the City's goals and objectives. Capital improvements are major projects undertaken by the City that are generally not recurring on a long-term, annual basis. In this sense, they are differentiated from Maintenance and Operation (M&O) expenditures for normal City operation. They include design, inspection, testing, project administration, land and/or right-of- way acquisition, construction or modification of buildings or facilities, and public infrastructure construction or modification. Fiscal Years 2007/2008 through 201 1 /2012 CIP include a listing of projects by fiscal year priority and type of improvement. These projects are presented in summary on Exhibit 1. The fiscal year a project is scheduled depends on the availability of specific funding sources, operation and program needs, and prior City Council policy. Projects include street, drainage, traffic signals, sound walls, landscaping and lighting, and city facilities. Only those projects that have identified funding sources in the five-year period are listed within a fiscal year. Those projects that are designated as "additional projects" do not have identified funding sources through the term of the five-year program, or, in the case of DIF funded projects, a long-term collection period is required to develop the specified project. The additional projects are presented in summary on Exhibit 2. The identification of additional and/or alternative funding sources will be addressed during the annual review and approval of subsequent CIP's. Each pr6ject-fjg",0' described in brief detail including a description of the project, the location of the project, a breakdown of the estimated project cost, the revenue sources proposed to be used to fund the project, and an estimate of the annual M&0 costs associated with the capital improvement. The completion of any specific capital improvement project may have a direct impact on the M&0 budgets of the General Fund and other funds. An estimate of these future costs is necessary to assess whether there is financial capacity of the operating budget to cover these ongoing costs. All project costs included in the CIP are at current year project estimates. No inflation factors have been utilized in determining costs for projects in Fiscal Years 2008/2009 through 201 1 /2012. The 2006/2007 CIP identified $12,005,703 in capital improvement projects. All 2006/2007 projects are either completed, are currently in the design or construction stage, or will have contracts awarded by the end of the fiscal year. Included in the CIP document is a "Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Project Status Report," which lists: one 1996/1997 project carried - over, one 2000/2001 projects underway, one 2001 /2002 project underway, two 2002/2003 projects underway, three 2002/2003 projects completed, three 2003/2004 projects completed, two 2004/2005 projects underway, one 2004/2005 project completed, four 2005/2006 projects underway, one 2005/2006 projects completed, and seven 2006/2007 project underway. Also included is a "Carryover Project Summary" which provides the life -to -date expenditures for all active CIP projects. Fiscal Year 2007/2008 proposes $67,395,836 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of eighteen projects identified for this fiscal year. Project Number 199613-Washington Street/1-10 Interchange Improvements is recurring long-term commitment. Two other projects are recurring as part of a long term plan to fill missing sidewalk links (199702-Sidewalks-Various Locations) and to install new or upgrade existing handicap access ramps (Project Number 199703-Handicap Access Ramp -Various Locations) to comply with the ever evolving ADA standards. There are fifteen new or secondary phased projects proposed to complete the 2007/2008 CIP. These projects include: 200601 — Adams Street Bridge Improvement (Spanning/Whitewater River) Construction Phase - The Adams Street Bridge Improvement is funded at 80% percent with Caltrans HBRR/STP funds. 200608 — SilverRock Resort Phase II Golf Course - Design Phase - The design phase of SilverRock Resort Phase II Golf Course was originally approved to receive funding during Fiscal Year 2006/2007 from future RDA Bond Proceeds. An evaluation of the City's available fund balance within RDA Project Area Number 1 has determined that a future Bond Measure is not necessary at this time. The design phase of the SilverRock Resort Phase II Golf Course is included in Fiscal Year 2007/2008 for the purpose of changing its revenue source form future RDA Bond Proceeds to RDA Project Area Number 1 funds. 200701 — SilverRock Resort Phase II Club House — Construction Phase 200702 — SilverRock Resort Phase II Infrastructure — Construction Phase 200703 — SilverRock Resort Phase II Entry Features/Roads — Construction Phase The estimated cost of the construction phase of the SilverRock Resort Phase II Club House, Infrastructure and Entry Features/Roads has been updated based on information learned during the preliminary design phase of each project. 200704 — Village Signage Program 200705 — Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk (Westward Ho at LQ High School) 200706 — New Traffic Signal (Fred Waring Drive @ Palm Royale) 200707 — New Traffic Signal (Dune Palms @ Retail Center — Sam's Club Entrance) 200708 — Corporation Yard — Design Phase 200709 — Phase I (Part 1) Golf Cart Routes 200710 — Phase II Library Improvements 200711 — Sports Complex Renovation 200712 — Community Park — Land Acquisition 200713 — Calle Estado/La Fonda Mid -Block Pedestrian Crossing Fiscal Year 2008/2009 proposes $3,151,347 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of six projects identified for this fiscal year. These projects include the recurring projects previously listed, the construction phase of the 200708 — Corporation Yard, and the following two new projects: 200801 — New Traffic Signal (Washington Street @ Lake La Quinta Drive) 200802 — Sound Attenuation Wall (W. Washington Street at Laguna de la Paz) Fiscal Year 2009/2010 proposes $19,039,000 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of four projects identified for this fiscal year. These projects include the recurring projects previously listed, and the construction phase of the 200608 — SilverRock Resort Phase II Golf Course. Fiscal Year 2010/2011 includes the three previously listed recurring projects for a total expenditure of $85,000. Fiscal Year 201 1 /2012 proposes $645,354 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of four projects identified for this fiscal year. These projects include the recurring projects previously listed, and the 201101 — Calle Tampico Pedestrian Crossings (Desert Club and Avenida Bermudas). There are forty-two Add Projects identified under the current CIP Additional Projects (Add Projects) list that are not scheduled for funding within the next five years. The costs associated with the implementation of these projects are estimated at $68,584,237. Please refer to the detail sheets located under the Additional Projects tab for additional information regarding these additional projects. New to this year's CIP is a tab labeled Developer Reimbursement Request (DRR). The information presented within this section provides the Council with a status and summary of Developer requested reimbursements for projects eligible for future funding by the Transportation DIF. In accordance with the approved agreements, reimbursement will be made when Transportation DIF funding becomes available. According to the current Cash Flow Model for Fiscal Year 2007/2008, Transportation DIF funding is not available at this time to reimburse the developers for eligible improvements. If the Council chooses to fund these improvements during Fiscal Year 2007/2008, the project priorities previously identified to receive Transportation DIF funding can not be built without a loan from the City's General Fund. The City has received a formal request from Destination Development Corporation (DDC) (Attachment 2) requesting the City fund Avenue 58 from PGA West to the Northern Boundary of Coral Canyon. The project is part of CIP Project AD13 — Avenue 58 Street Improvements (from PGA West to Madison Street)• The developer is requesting Transportation DIF funds in the amount of $2,217,312 be appropriated toward this project during Fiscal Year 2007/2008. As previously discussed, Transportation DIF funds are not currently available to assign to this project without a loan from the City's General Fund. The City has received a request from the Laguna de la Paz Homeowners Association (Attachment 3) requesting a Sound Attenuation Wall be constructed along Washington Street adjacent to their residential community. This project is currently being evaluated in the Update of the Washington Street Sound Attenuation Study. The project is also tentatively listed for funding as CIP Project 200802 Sound Attenuation Wall (W• Washington at Laguna de la Paz) during Fiscal Year 2008/2009. The City has received a request from several homeowners within the Palms Residential Community (Attachment 4) requesting median island landscaping be installed on Avenue 56 (Airport Blvd.) from Monroe Street west to the Palms Golf Club Entrance. This project is identified as CIP Project AD12 — Avenue 56 (Monroe to .5 miles west of Monroe. The project is estimated at $545,393 and expected to be funded from future Transportation DIF. Transportation DIF funds are not v, currently available to assign to this project during Fiscal Year 2007/2008 without a loan from the City's General Fund. 000163 Fund emergency reserves, a General Fund reserve for cash flow purposes, and allocation of sufficient funds to cover current contracted and authorized capital improvement projects. 2. Because of increases in ongoing maintenance costs, the addition of completed improvements and the provisions of Proposition 218, the Lighting and Landscape District may not have sufficient funding in the future. The current fund balance and annual assessment revenues are inadequate to cover all future capital and operational cost increases. The alternative would be to continue to defer specific lighting and landscape improvements and/or reduce existing landscape maintenance activities until such time that other revenue sources are available. The City Council's review of the draft Fiscal Year 2007/2008 CIP will enable City staff to complete the final CIP for public review. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council is required to schedule a public hearing on the CIP and consider its adoption at a subsequent regular meeting. Upon its adoption, the 2007/2008 CIP will be incorporated into the City's Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Budget. Respectfully submitted, &M2A4::� Tim thy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: (?L �1- A/, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Capital Improvement Program (Council Only) 2. Request from Destination Development Corporation 3. Request from Laguna de la Paz Homeowners 4. Request from Palms Residents 0001OA DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION January 23, 2007 Mr. Tom Genovese City Manager Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247 Dear Tom, Attachment 2 Please allow this correspondence to serve as a formal request to include the Jefferson Street Extended Road ("Projecf) as part of the City of La Quinta's Capital Improvement Projects for 2007. The Project extends from Avenue 58 to the northerly tract boundary of Tract 33444. This Project should be included for the following reasons: 1. There is an extremely dangerous 90 degree turn at the east end of Avenue 58 as the road approaches Lake Cahuilla and The Quarry. There are many large RVs as well as daily traffic negotiating this turn and narrow road over Dike 42. The new road will provide far safer access to The Quarry, Lake Cahuilla, and the future Coral Canyon and Travertine developments. 2. The Project, along with further improvements to Avenue 58, is long overdue for completion. The road was approved in the city's General Plan over 10 years ago. Avenue 58 is rapidly being developed with quality residential communities along a street that is marginal at best. 3. Construction of the Project will provide a safer access to the Boo Hoff Trail for both equestrian and pedestrian use. The proposed equestrian trail alignment will link Lake Cahuilla to the Boo Hof Trail, and provide safe access over Dike #2 for riders traveling west on Avenue 58. 4, The Project is "ready to go". All engineering and construction drawings are in plan check and are pending approval. All environmental approvals have been received. The Project's "right of use" application has also been submitted to the Bureau of Reclamation. Approval is expected in April. 74-0001 Reserve Drive Indian Wells, California 92210 760-779-1646 Fax:760-779-1469 � Tlennon©loweenterprises.com C1 A Lowe Enterprises Company 5. The Coachella Valley Regional Parks District's new regional hiking park is adjacent to the Project. Constructing the road now will have substantially less impact prior to park completion and day use of the park by residents. Included in this correspondence are complete cost estimates for the Project along with a color coded map to delineate each cost area breakdown. We believe these estimates to be very accurate at this point as we have analyzed and compared engineering cost estimates with contractor bid prices. Thank you for your time and consideration. I will call you later this week to further discuss. Yours truly, OL4 Tom Cullinan Senior Vice President LDD Desert Development Inc. Cc: Don Adolph, Mayor City of La Quinta TC/cp Jefferson Street Extended Request p.2 1/23/2000 0 0 1 � Stantec - Palm Desert CORAL CANYON TRACT 33444 FOR CITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT vun_uleeo.e nouunkT nC oonaAa, T7 CnRT REVISED 10/2512006 GI\.11l\LL,\ V V, PGA WEST - OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS -JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION 1,170 CY 825 LF $ $ 2.50 20.00 $ $ 2,926.00 16,500.00 JEFFERSON STREET 1 ROUGH GRADE RIGHT OF WAY 2 8" CURB & GUTTER 3 4 STREET PAVEMENT 4.&1 ACI7"BASE PARKWAY LANDSCAPING & LIGHTS 41,395 1.650 SF SF $ 3.30 $ $ 136,603.50 16,500.00 TOTAL. JEFFERSON STREET$ 172,528.50 PGA 1 2 WEST CONNECTION ROUGH GRADE RIGHT OF WAY STREET PAVEMENT 4"ACI6"BASE 1,500 20.300 CY SF q$2 $ $ 3,750.00 63,945.00 TOTAL PGA WEST CONNECTION $ 67,695.00 SUBTOTALI $ 240,223.50 CIVIL&ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION SUBTOTAL i 7.0% 10.0% $ $ $ 16.815.65 24,022.35 881.061.50 CONTINGENCY 10.0% $ 28.106.15 TOTAL PGA WEST JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION "m Enr ET!M ANn UAVN rNE $ E 309,167.64 ARIL REFLECT PLEASE NOTE: TNIS tNGINECN'a uYinnnv I+r rnwno,.c uw, w.ww w..... ........._........_ __......—....._. ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS INCURRED. THIS COST ESTIMATE IS BASED ON STANTEC'S JEFFERSON STREET REALIGNMENT EMISIT. STANTEC MAKES NO GUARANTEE AS TO ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS INCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 1 Of4 amm3 4Vl3?ww"o'es*mwm&7&TSctTVRamuRsFmENrAw&WENr OPCAb Stantec - Palm Desert CORAL CANYON TRACT 33444 FOR CITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ENGINFCRW nPINInm nF PRORARI_F COST REVISED 10=006 QUARRY RANCH - OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS - JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION DESG. PITp. :�J,` " ¢ 41+ �M �fi ,', �JNI'P.t E'W"' -,,'. _ 8 8�-To JEFFERSON STREET 1 ROUGH GRADE RIGHT OF WAY 585 CY $ 2.50 $ 1,462.50 2 8" CURB & GUTTER 1,175 LF $ 20.00 $ 23.500.00 3 STREET PAVEMENT 4.5" AC/T'BASE 19.992 SF $ 3.30 $ 65.973.50 4 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING & LIGHTS 2,300 SF $ 10.00 $ 23,000.00 TOTAL JEFFERSON STREET $ 113,936.10 CAHUILLA PARK ROAD SPUR 1 IROUGH GRADE RIGHT OF WAY 1,450 CY $ 2.50 $ 3,625.56 2 STREET PAVEMENT 4" AC/6"BASE 18,000 SF $ 3.15 $ 50,400.00 3 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING & LIGHTS 8,000 SF $ 7.50 $ 60.000.00 4 6" CURB & GUTTER 800 LF $ 17.25 1 IS 13,800.00 TOTAL CAHUILLA PARK ROAD SPUR $ 114,025.56 SUBTOTALl $ 227,961.66 CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL 7.0% $ 15,957.32 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION 10.0% S 22 796.17 SUBTOTAL $ 266,715.14 CONTINGENCY 10.0% $ 26,671.51 TOTAL QUARRY RANCH JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION $ 293,386.65 PLEASE NOTE THIS ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST IS BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME AND MAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS INCURRED. THIS COST ESTIMATE IS BASED ON STANTECS JEFFERSON STREET REALIGNMENT EMiISIT. STANTEC 2W4 O: =7WomTogw=uetl,reWo� iDo Cm'ROMeURSWEWA�PC t.e Stantec - Palm Desert CORAL CANYON TRACT 33444 FOR CITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST REVISED 10125MOOS D.I.F. - OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS - JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION qM , l ''.ITEM. yt ti^. :��.n t s'Yyt s'•• _e'.��'g pv_ �.',a'x":t -ire-'..,_sr`."•Vs�<,,,4;.:.,,";.;i:. _�,rzN,;: DEBC PTION,:;.......,>....:.....:.._._„„.r.-_,�;::._......:':;a:;:c:.i..., PhF �:tis' ,P,I+%S. ,V'QT.Y•�:.,i>IlITiTS::�UN�TP..RICE;I.�,Cix: ._u,. E'kr •„� 3; su,: ; ALT a,SU&TOTAE:,,t4x;... JEFFERSON STREET 1 ROUGH GRADE RIGHT OF WAY 2,990 CY $ 2.50 $ 7,475.00 2 EMBANKMENT OVER DIKE - FROM BORROW AREA 68,000 CY $ 5.00 $ 340,000.00 3 8" CURB & GUTTER 3,162 LF $ 20.00 $ 63,240.00 4 8 FT SIDEWALK, 4IN THICK 15,496 SF $ 3.50 $ 54,235.00 5 STREET PAVEMENT 4.5" AW"BASE 102,469 SF $ 3.30 $ 338,147,70 6 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING & LIGHTS 10198 SF $ 10.00 $ 101.980.00 7 60" RCP EQUALIZING LINE 400 1 LF I $ 300.00 $ 120,000.00 TOTAL JEFFERSON STREETI $ 1,025,078.70 SUBTOTALI $ 1,025,078.70 CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL 7.0"/O $ 71,755.51 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION 10.0% $ 102,507.87 FUBTOTALI $ 1,199,342.08 CONTINGENCY 1 10.0% $ 119,934.21 TOTAL D.I.F. JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION $ 1,319,276.29 PLFASE NOTE THIS ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST IS EASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE ATTHE TIME AND MAY NOTNECESSARILY REFLECT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS INCURRED. THIS COST ESTIMATE IS BASED ON STANTEC'S JEFFERSON STREET REALIGNMENT EXHIBIT. STANTEC 000170 30f4 o.vz&v PmiwdoeSlotlh®woo-io-23GTYREimouRsEMFMAGREEMFNTOPc.* Stantec - Palm Dosed CORAL CANYON TRACT 33444 FOR CITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FMT:IMFFR'C OPINION OF PRORARI E COST REVISED 1012512D05 CITY FUND -OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS -JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION ITEM DESCRIPTION OTY UNITS IUNITPRICE SUB -TOTAL JEFFERSON STREET 1 ROUGH GRADE RIGHT OF WAY 1,755 CY $ 2.50 $ 4,387.50 2 8" CURB & GUTTER 1,326 LF $ 20.00 $ 26,520.00 3 8 FT SIDEWALK, 4IN THICK 9,392 SF $ 3.50 $ 32,872.00 4 STREET PAVEMENT 4.5" AC/7"BASE 61,500 SF $ 3.30 $ 202,950.00 5 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING & LIGHTS 14,112 SF $ 10.00 $ 141 120.00 6 4-48"RCP CULVERTS 800 LF $ 800.00 $ 640,000.00 7 78" IRRIGATION LINE 200 LF 1 $ 350.00 $ 70,000.00 8 10' WIDE MULTI -PURPOSE FENCE 3.250 LF 1 $ 14.00 $ 45 600.00 TOTAL JEFFERSON STREETI $ 1,163,349.50 CAHUILLA PARK ROAD SPUR 1 IROUGH GRADE RIGHT OF WAY 1,450 CY $ 2.50 IS 3,625.56 2 STREET PAVEMENT 4" ACWBASE 27,243 SF $ 3.15 $ 85,815.45 3 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING & LIGHTS 8,300 SF $ 7.50 $ 52,250.00 4 MEDIAN LANDSCAPING 3,100 SF $ 7.50 $ 23,250.00 5 6" CURB & GUTTER 830 LF $ 17.25 $ 14,317.50 17�- TOTAL CAHUILLA PARK ROAD SPUR $ 174,941.01 SUBTOTAL $ 1,338,290.51 CIVIL&ENVIRONMENTAL 7.0% $ 93.680.34 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION 10.0% $ 133,829.05 SUBTOTAL $ 1,565 799.89 CONTINGENCY 1 10.0°k $ 156.579.99 TOTAL CITY FUND JEFFERSON STREET EXTENSION $ 1,722,379.88 PLEASE NOTE THIS ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST IS BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE ATTHETIME AND MAY NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS INCURRED. THIS COST ESTIMATE IS BASED ON STANTECS JEFFERSON STREET REALIGNMENT EXHIBIT. STANTEC 000171 4of4 o;,A mom?oamwbsu,ouwsto-2scrrymmauRsEMENTAcmuiENTOPC s Donna Wood 48-131 Calle Seronas Attachment 3 La Quinta, California 92253 May 10, 2005 Hand Delivered Mayor Don Adolph City Council The homeowners of Laguna be La Paz bordering on Washington Street respectfully request the City to address Recommendation 9.5 as outlined in the Sound Attenuation Study prepared by Alliance Acoustical Consultont, Inc, dated June 4, 2003. This request would require action by the Council to move the project from the Capital Improvements Plan unfunded list to the (CIP) funded priorities for 2006. The construction of the appropriate noise barrier will mitigate what has become a major deterrent to the quality of life for Laguna be La Paz residents adjacent to Washington Street. I look forward to your positive response. Si cerely, , .� w �� Donna Wood 00017? JIM T. MURPHY ,ice 17 �5 77-947 Lego Drive, IAQumta, CA. 92?S3 760-771-W38 January S. 20M The Honorable pan Adolph City of LaQuinta PA. Sec 1504 LaQuW a. CA. SP247 Sir M Apra of 2003, The Lego LaQuhnta Homes Association Committee met with Mr. Tim Jonasson PE Public Elsonho"ar At UM Works p v&", to discuss an over increasing noise problem on Avenue 50, between Washington and Of Sr ickenn r a fetter which detailed traffic vakam which was part c4 a sociates studlf done in Mtraffic an t arch of 1989. This study, which was presented to the he 2003, sound Pram traffic wouldheatase B n o« W�kgib n/Avenue 50 location, It stated that by Tampico and Eisenhower has further' lxy noise a of 6096 The adddion of a new school located at eM the nolse level. The City of LaQuinta acted on this situation and erected a ten aveka feet wag on Washington and extended it 700 feet west on Avenue 50, in order to solve the noise problem, We have worked with Mr. Jonasson since 2003. On July 1. 2003. the City Council approved the sound study and was directed to bring boafunding recommendations though per fees PFL and to, Include the sound wells in the next CIP Program.Impact We "axt met with Mr. Jorassan in January 2004. and Presented a follow up letter on the wall. learned [fiery that we were not In the CIP Program, but would be included in 2W5. Im March of 2004 the City [.Merl. June Greek indxxted that we should plan attending the AprA [Sty council meeting to present oury curs on am wag and its inclusion with CIP for fiscal Year 200"5. We attended that request As a result, our Project was added by the City Council to the CIP as an unfurnd prolectt made our In December' 2004, many homeowners wrote tatters to you asking for your help n obtaining funding with DIF fees for our sound wag, In April 2005, Tim Jonesson sent me an etnay saying the sound level problems were well documented and believed the wee would be discussed In the May meeting k ng the OF update. The City Council meeting was held on June 7. 2005. where we were invited to make a brief oral Presentation. nt'ation• A large contingency of our homeowners attended the meeting, and our spokesman Tan Flynn, resulting �key Points awa�g the sound wal Ha discussed the study. the everincressing volume of cars °n Avenue 50. The City approved � proposal Is to extend the current wag at Montero Estates 1.751 feet west Homeowner's Association was y proposal unanimously. 1 think it is neba%arthy that the Lego only one repo esembei that had an interest in the DIF. 00017t7 -2- We Understand our wall must now compete with other transportat;Wbeautification elated projects for MeeW9oWe v that Clu fund and look reward to making a tlnel presentation at the City Councl mg in the 2WSW Clp. a � �his staff. P� thank Tan Jonesson for his help and guidance durin the past three years, as well Yours very truly, U Jim T. Murphy �J President Lego LeQuiMa Homes Association JTM.iww Q Temy Henderson Stan Sniff Lee Osborne Pm Perkins Tkn Jmasson 000174 000175 F. Michael Wiles 56-235 Village Drive La Quinta, California 92235 760.771.6970 January 29, 2007 Mayor Don Adolph & City Council Members City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 FEB ATTACHMENT 4 RR Unimproved median on Airport Boulevard from Monroe Street, west to the unimproved section west of the Palms Golf Club entrance. Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: First I would like to extend my appreciation to you for recognizing this project as a Capital Improvement Project and further, for identifying the Developers Improvement Fund as the funding source. Thank -you. We have been looking at that eyesore for six years now and are delighted by the impending improvement. I am hopeful that design and construction funds can be allocated for this project, in the 2007/2008, Budget and that the. work could begin as soon as possible, Needless to say, it would be a tremendous enhancement for all homeowners in the area. I thank you.for your support and look forward to your continuing energy toward completing. this project. Our entire family, our neighbors and friends look forward to driving down a fully landscaped Airport Boulevard in the near future. Sin � �-� ✓ \ � � F. Mi hael Wiles 000178 January 16, 2007 Mayor Don Adolph & City Council Members City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 RE: Unimproved median on Airport Boulevard from Monroe Street, west to the unimproved section west of the Palms Golf Club entrance. Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: JAN 3 1 cif--- yO�UIN!_—.J I'll MANAGER'S OEPT 1 First we would like to extend our appreciation to you for recognizing this project as a Capital Improvement Project and further, for identifying the Developers Improvement Fund as the funding source. Thank -you. We have been looking at that eyesore for six years now and are delighted by the impending improvement. We are hopeful that design and construction funds can be allocated for this project in the 2007/2008 Budget and that the work could begin as soon as possible. Needless to say, it would be a tremendous enhancement for all homeowners in the area. We thank you for your support and look forward to your continuing energy toward completing this project. We look forward to driving down a fully landscaped Airport Boulevard in the near future. Also, the road improvements on Madison Street and the impending completion of the Avenue 54 resurfacing have received rave reviews from our club members and homeowners. Our heartfelt thanks to Tim Jonasson, who attended our annual homeowners meeting last year, for staying the course. Sincerely, The Village at The Palms HOA Board of Directors C/O Monarch Management 42-600 Caroline Court Suite 101 Palm Desert, California 92211 Jim Mannix, President Rick Robinson, Treasurer Duane Young, Se January 29, 2007 Mayor Don Adolph & City Council Members City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 RE: Unimproved median on Airport Boulevard from Monroe Street, west to the unimproved section west of the Palms Golf Club entrance. Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: FEB 2 OTr First we would like to extend our appreciation to you for recognizing this project as a Capital Improvement Project and further, for identifying the Developers Improvement Fund as the funding source. Thank -you. We have been looking at that eyesore for six years now and are delighted by the impending improvement. We are hopeful that design and construction funds can be allocated for this project in the 2007/2008 Budget and that the work could begin as soon as possible. Needless to say, it would be a tremendous enhancement for all homeowners in the area. We thank you for your support and look forward to your continuing energy toward completing this project. We look forward to driving down a fully landscaped Airport Boulevard in the near future. in r y, Gary & Felice Pietsch 81802 Couples Court La' Quinta, CA 92253- uiN ra� S �EPT 000178 January 30, 2007 Mayor Don Adolph & City Council Members City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 RE: Unimproved median on Airport Boulevard from Monroe Street, west to the unimproved section west of the Palms Golf Club entrance. Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: FEB - 5 j tJj �-� CIiY Of lA uUi•!lp CITY MANAGER S DEPT First we would like to extend our appreciation to you for recognizing this project as a Capital hnprovement Project and further, for identifying the Developers Improvement Fund as the funding source. Thank -you. We have been looking at that eyesore for six years now and are delighted by the impending improvement. We are hopeful that design and construction "funds can be allocated for this project in the 2007/2008 Budget and that the work could begin as soon as possible. Needless to say, it would be a tremendous enhancement for all homeowners in the area. We thank you for your support and look forward to your continuing energy toward completing this project. We look forward to driving down a fully landscaped Airport Boulevard in the near future. Also, the road improvements on Madison Street and the impending completion of the Avenue 54 resurfacing have received rave reviews from our club members and homeowners. Our heartfelt thanks to Tim Jonasson, who attended our annual homeowners meeting last year, for staying the course. Sipcerely, Mr. aai Mrs. Steven Trutanich Homeowner at The Palms (Lot #77) 000179 FM 2: EDWARD J. STRUIKSMA cirvor �a ownra I P. O. Box 1284 ciry MANAGER s oErr LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92247 — ---- -- JANUARY 30, 2007 MAYOR DON ADOLPH & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF LA QUNITA 7&495 CALLS TAMPICO LA QUNrrA, CALIFORNIA 92253 RE: UNIMPROVED MEDIAN ON AIRPORT BOULEVARD FROM MONROE STREET WEST. DEAR MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: I WAS PLEASE, AS A RESIDENT OF THE PALMS, TO HEAR THAT YOU HAVE TAKEN ACTION TO IMPROVE THE CENTER MEDIAN ON AIRPORT BOULEVARD IN FRONT OF THE PALMS. THIS CONDITION HAS BEEN AN EYESORE FOR AT LEAST SIX YEARS AND SOMETHING REALLY NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT IT AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BY PLACING THIS ITEM IN YOUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT UNDER THE DEVELOPERS IMPROVEMENT FUND IS A BIG AND POSITIVE FIRST STEP. I AM NOT CERTAIN WHY THIS MATTER HAD NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SOONER AND 1 HAVE HEARD THAT SOME THINGS MAY HAVE SUPPED BETWEEN THE CRACKS, AS PEOPLE LIKE TO SAY, BUT WHATEVER THE REASON I WOULD HOPE THE CITY COUNCIL WILL DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO SAY ON TOP OF THIS MATTER TO ENSURE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ALSO, 1 WOULD LIKE TO SAY WE WILL ALL BE VERY HAPPY WHEN THE IMPROVEMENTS ON MADISON STREET AND AVENUE 54 ARE DONE. •. a CC: MONARCH MANAGEMENT 000180 January 29, 2007 cm of is `ui�ira� (YTY MAWAUR'S UPT Mayor Don Adolph & City Council Members City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 RE: Unimproved median on Airport Boulevard from Monroe Street, west to the unimproved section west of the Palms Golf Club entrance. Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: First we would like to extend our appreciation to you for recognizing this project as a Capital Improvement Project and for identifying the Developers Improvement Fund as the funding source. We have been driving by the eyesore for six years now and are delighted the city is considering the landscape improvements.. We are hopeful that design and construction funds can be allocated for this project very soon and that the work could begin immediately thereafter... Needless to say, it would be a tremendous enhancement for all homeowners in the area. We thank you for your support and look forward to your continuing energy toward completing this project. We look forward to driving down a fully landscaped Airport Boulevard in the near future. Please thank Tim Jonasson, who attended our annual homeowners meeting last year, for staying the course with us on this project. ncerely, k� tr, . o McUC4lure_and Kelvin Davis Owners Lot 51 Village of the Palms La Quinta, CA 92253 000181 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: n MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A Regularly Scheduled meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 7, 2007 10:00 a.m. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:12 a.m. by Planning Manager Les Johnson. f3 C. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Frank Christopher and Tracy Smith. Staff present: Planning Manager Les Johnson, Principal Planner Wallace Nesbit, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. II. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Bobbitt to approve the Minutes of January 17, 2007 as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2006-852; a request of Eden Rock at PGA West for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a 292-unit residential complex, consisting of single-family attached units, in the Resort Core at PGA West for the property located on the east and north sides of PGA West Boulevard, west of the existing Stadium Clubhouse. 1. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he had a potential conflict of interest as he was employed by the HOA that directly adjoined this project. He excused himself and withdrew from the meeting. 2. Principal Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the I 0()01$; Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee February 7, 2007 Community Development Department. Staff informed the Committee that the architect is unable to attend the meeting. 3. Committee Member Christopher asked if the site tiered up as you move toward the center of the project. Staff explained the grade changes. 4. Committee Member Smith asked if the existing houses would be impacted by the two-story houses proposed on the northwest corner. Staff stated there may be some opportunities where this could be possible. Committee Member Smith asked if there were any other two-story units at PGA West. Staff noted locations where other two-story units existed. Committee Member Smith asked the purpose of the towers. Staff stated they were viewing platforms. Mr. Louis Swartz, applicant, stated that when the tower was designed they wanted a village feel. The tower is in the heart of the community to simulate this idea. Second, it is in the center so it is not visible from outside the boundaries of the site. 5. Committee Member Christopher stated he agrees with the architecture and staff's recommendation regarding the perimeter wall. In regard to the window noted by staff, he has no problem, but if the intent is to be a truly Tuscan look, the window is out of character. It is a focal point to break up symmetry of all the windows. He would leave it up to the applicant. Mr. Swarts stated they were not looking for a truly Tuscan look, but more of an old world look. 6. Committee Member Smith stated his only concern would be that the existing homeowners do not have their privacy impacted by either the tower or the second story units. In regard to the landscaping, the California Pepper and mesquite should be deleted from the plant list. 7. Mr. Bill Walter, representing PGA West HOA, private clubhouse and stadium course stated this project will be a focal point as the homes are behind guarded gates. They are opposed to the project as they do not believe it represents PGA West. He believes a hotel would be better as it would bring amenities as well as management. This project does not have any management which causes them safety concerns. They have created committees to meet with the applicant and still do not believe it belongs to PGA West. 000183 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee February 7, 2007 8. Mr. Jim Cox, representing PGA West HOA, handed out a letter regarding PGA West development history. The Green Units are the only units not on the fairway, but they have a water feature with a green belt. The Medalists all face the fairway. Subsequently, the lot sizes were restricted with the intent to create a future development of low density homes. Since then 80% of the homes are within the 3,000 square foot size with pools. Looking at that trend, this project does not blend with what is existing. Being right in the middle of PGA West how do they intend to manage security of the existing courses. 9. Committee Member Smith asked the density. Staff stated seven units to the acre and the existing is approximately three units to the acre. If you include all the open space/golf course area it would probably be about one unit to the acre. Mr. Swartz stated they have presented the project to the HOA and will have onsite management. The price range for the homes will be up to $1,000,000. 10. Committee Member Christopher asked if the project was within the zoning classification. Staff stated they are asking for a medium density zone change which will require a General Plan Amendment. It is a change in use and therefore a reduction in density. Committee Member Christopher stated he is sensitive to the concerns of the community. From the architectural point, it is a well planned and thought out project. Its suitability to the site is not a part of this Committee's purview. 11. There being no further questions, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Smith to adopt Minute Motion 2007-002 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-852, as recommended with the addition of exploration of possible modification of the northwest units to be single story, as well as additional detailing to perimeter wall being cap. Unanimously approved. Committee Member Bobbitt rejoined the Committee. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None p� Z Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee February 7, 2007 Vill. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Smith to adjourn this Regular Meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a Regular Meeting to be held on March 7, 2007. This meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. on February 7, 2007. Respectfully submitted, C AWY�� Execu ive Secretary REPORTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEM: vZ I COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES February 12, 2007 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Community Services Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. in the La Quinta City Hall Study Session Room. Vice -Chairperson Sylk presided over the meeting and Commissioner Leidner led the Pledge of Allegiance. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Mark Weber Vice -Chairperson Robert F. Sylk Commissioner Bob Leidner Commissioner Andrea Gassman Commissioner E. Howard Long STAFF PRESENT: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director Steve Howlett, Golf & Parks Manager Angela Guereque, Community Services Secretary PUBLIC COMMENT Kay Wolff and Andrea Dooley will speak on their support of the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve Master Plan during the Business Session. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Motion - It was moved by Commissioner Leidner and seconded by Commissioner Gassman to confirm the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. PRESENTATIONS — Walt Meyer, La Quinta Police Chief, Park Vandalism. Chief Meyer stated that one great thing about La Quinta is the amount of parks. The vandalism issue came to a head about a'year and a half ago with a few incidents at the skate park and bad publicity. We looked at the issue of vandalism in the parks and nature areas to see how to deal, with the vandalism. Police service is the most expensive service to try to stop vandalism. There was a total of $35,000 in vandalism damage to La Quinta parks in one year. As the City gets bigger, discussions of getting a parks and recreation officer to work on these types of issues could be done. This would be an investment of about $125,000 per year. We look at the parks from an issue of trying to lower crime through Crime COmri mnitq Sotvoos Gom, nssu>n Minutes I dbnirvl 12, 200l i- Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED). Writing tickets is not going to solve a lot of the vandalism issues. The fencing was changed at the La Quinta Park Skate Park to keep kids from lifting their bikes over the fence. 20% of the kids in our community are committing 80% of the vandalism. The La Quinta SET Team does a good job identifying these kids. This prevention can be done through CPTED rather than manpower. CPTED provides better control through park visibility and design. Chief Meyer stated the Civic Center Campus is very difficult to watch because it is surrounded by buildings and mounding which makes it hard to see from the road. Commissioner Gassman asked if we could use police on bicycles. Chief Meyer stated that bicycles are limited to deputies on special assignments. If there is an identified problem or series of vandalism after 2:00 p.m. in areas where bikes would be used for surveillance, then they could be used. It is not cost effective to put the bicycles out there on a regular patrol basis. Commissioner Gassman stated that the Commissioners have voiced concerns on the determination of who was committing the vandalism and also to come up with a program where the vandal is asked to help clean up. Chief Meyer stated that the Police Department does not dispense justice. The District Attorney and Judges make the decisions on justice. These vandals have to be supervised and monitored by staff and this will incur costs to the City. Staff does a great job planning the parks and taking caring of them. A lot of the issues that happen at the parks happen at organized events such as AYSO, Little League, Pee Wee Football, etc. All of these groups have sanctions for improper activity. Director Hylton stated that these groups have agreements with the City that if we have notification and we can identify the vandals, they can be removed from the program. Vice -Chairperson Sylk asked what the best deterrent is for these issues and how do the vandals get to some of these areas without people seeing them. Chief Meyer stated that the best deterrent is exactly what the City has been doing, maintaining the parks at the highest level possible. These are 10-20 person crews with lookouts, they have instantaneous communications. You are going to have damage and issues when you push 200,000 people through a facility in a year. Vice -Chairperson Sylk asked if most of the kids doing the graffiti are from La Quinta. Chief Meyer stated that there are La Quinta groups of kids that are vandalizing and it doesn't matter where the others live. Chief Meyer stated that the new thing is slap tagging. Anyone can pick up stickers at the Post Office for mail; the vandals are putting graffiti on them and then slapping them on stop signs, etc. throughout the community. i Vice -Chairperson Sylk suggested an after school Jr. Deputy Program. Chief Meyer stated that there is a pro and a con to everything and this would be something to have a meeting over and get input. 000187 conimunity Sorvwos C;ommsston Minutes Fek,n;nry 12, 2001 3- Commissioner Leidner asked if the $35,000 includes labor. Golf & Parks Manager Howlett stated that his division tracks materials only, but Public Works tracks materials and labor. Director Hylton stated that staff would verify that number. Commissioner Long asked what happens to the taggers when they are caught. Chief Meyer stated that it depends on whether they are adults or juveniles, what amount of damage is done, and whether it is gang related. Often times they are placed on probation. If it is a misdemeanor, they will not do any jail time, but get probation and fines. Chief Meyer stated that signage and visibility are the keys to reducing vandalism. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of January 8, 2007 Minutes Motion — It was moved by Commissioner Gassman and seconded by Vice - Chairperson Sylk to , approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR None. PUBLIC HEARING None. BUSINESS ITEMS 1 . Consideration of the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve Master Plan. Golf & Parks Manager, Steve Howlett, presented the Fred Wolff Bear Creek Nature Preserve Master Plan to the Commission. Staff has approached CVWD regarding the Whitewater Channel that runs through the preserve. It looks like we can move forward on abandoning the bank of dirt, because the FEMA wash is now in place. Staff is waiting on CVWD to provide a formal written consent that CVWD no longer requires that bank. CVWD's concern is that they have vehicle access to the property. Director Hylton stated that the City owns a portion of the southern section of the property which could extend the preserve. The primary goal right now is to get the signage in place, get vehicular access to stop in these areas, and turn this area into the preserve it was intended for. 1 � i Co, rr,iErtit;rScrdiecs Commission Minutes FAi -wy 12, 2,Y)7 l Commissioner Leidner asked if cable fencing would be planned in this area. Director Hylton stated that the City has recycle funds which can be used towards recycled fencing similar to what is at SilverRock Resort. Commissioner Long noted that on page 3 of the Master Plan, Landscape paragraph 1, there is a typo "und" should be "and." Kay Wolff introduced Andrea Dooley, Linda Williams, and Joan Rebich. Ms. Wolff thanked the Commission for the work that is being done. The Stewards of the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve are a larger group of people who will support the activities once the Master Plan is in place and there are activities that need community support. The Stewards are very impressed and pleased with the quality of the work in the Master Plan. Andrea Dooley stated that this is a very important project. There are no more natural spaces; we need to preserve this property. Chairperson Weber asked if staff had approached the Postal Service about moving the mailboxes from one side of the street to the other. Director Hylton stated that staff would like the plan approved before contacting the Postal Service. Commissioner Leidner asked if staff would be bringing back the concepts of fencing. Director Hylton stated that staff could bring it back to the Commission if they would like to look at the concepts. Chairperson Weber suggested that the Commission get an update on the status of the Nature Preserve on a monthly basis. Motion — It was moved by Commissioner Gassman and seconded by Vice - Chairperson Sylk to approve the Fred Wolff Bear Creek Nature Preserve Master Plan. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Consideration for Commission participation in the Community Concert and Poster Unveiling Director Hylton stated that staff would like the participation of the Commission at this event. Motion — It was moved by Commissioner Leidner and seconded by Commissioner Gassman to have Chairperson Weber and Commissioner Gassman participate in the Community Concert on February 18, 2007. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Consideration of Two Commissioners to Serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee 000189 Corimtnnty Sorvicos C:omrtussion Minutes Fnbrumy 12, 200, / Director Hylton stated that the Committee will meet on Thursday, March 15, 2007 in the morning of the Festival. Motion - It was moved by Commissioner Leidner and seconded by Commissioner Gassman to appoint Vice -Chairperson Sylk and Commissioner Long to serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee. Motion carried unanimously. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIALS 1 . Monthly Department Report for December 2006 2. Calendar of Monthly Events COMMISSIONER ITEMS 1. Reports from Commissioners Regarding Meetings Attended. Commissioner Long was present at the Golf Cart Parade and the Mini Health Fair. Commissioner Leidner was present at the Golf Cart Parade. OPEN DISCUSSION Chairperson Weber suggested that conversations should be started in the spring with the AYSO regarding their use of the fields. Director Hylton indicated that the conversations with the AYSO are ongoing. Chairperson Weber stated that the Volunteer hours at the Senior Center has dramatically increased and suggests we have the La Quinta Sun do an article. Commissioner Gassman stated that the Pillars of the Community event was a very positive event. Commissioner Gassman suggested that the Commission get the chance to see the Community Service Grant requests before they go before City Council. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Vice -Chairperson Sylk and seconded by Commissioner Long to adjourn the Community Services Commission meeting at 7:20 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. NEXT MEETING INFORMATION: A Regular Meeting of the Community Services Commission to be held on March 12, 2007 commencing at 5:30 p.m. in the La Quinta Civic Center South Conference Room, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. 0001,90 Co,minunity Snrvicf;s Commission Minutes 6- hAmiary 1 7, 2001 community cervices aecreiery 000191 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: v�-- MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 13, 2007 CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was reconvened at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Quill who asked Commissioner Alderson to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Ed Alderson, Katie Barrows, Jim Engle, and Chairman Paul Quill. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to excuse Commissioner Daniels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Doug Evans, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Planning Manager Les Johnson, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Assistant Planner Yvonne Franco, Senior Code Compliance Officer Anthony Moreno, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Quill asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of January 23, 2007. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. A. Environmental Assessment 2006-579 and Site Development Permit 2006-865; a request of CNL Desert Resorts, L. P. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a signature pool facility, for the property located on the west side of Avenida Obregon, approximately 150-feet south of Avenida Fernando, within the La Quinta Resort. *. 1. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file inQV019? Community Development Department. Staff reviewed `the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes12007\213-07.doc Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 revised Public Works Department conditions. Mr. Tony Locacciato, Impact Sciences, the City's CEQA consultant, gave a presentation on the EIR Addendum. Community Development Director Doug Evans gave a history of the Resort, traffic reports and parking. Staff noted each time there has been a change to the Resort the City has evaluated the environmental impacts. 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked if in the analysis of the grading would there be any import or export or soil. Staff stated there will be some export for the excavation of the proposed pools. The applicant will have the accurate export amount. Commissioner Alderson asked the timeframe is for the construction. Staff suggested the applicant would need to answer that question. Commissioner Alderson asked what future use the Morgan House would have and would it be related to this pool. Staff stated the Morgan House is technical issue. Under California law it needs to be renovated and re - enforced or demolished over time. At this time there is no proposed use associated with this project and no impact from this project on the House. Staff will be working with the applicant on all historic buildings on the property. 3. Commissioner Barrows asked staff to clarify the parking that would be eliminated and outline the entry gate turnaround area. Staff indicated the changes to the parking spaces at the entry that would be eliminated on the site plan. Commissioner Barrows asked if the rock mountain structures for the pool had any height constraints in regard to the City's height limits. Staff stated they are within the City's height limits. Commissioner Barrows asked the City's height limitations for Tourist Commercial areas. Staff stated they are allowed up to 40-feet. 4. Commissioner Engle asked the height of the southern rock feature. Staff stated it is 28 feet. Commissioner Engle asked the height of the buildings to the north of the rock features. Staff stated they are approximately 26 feet and the shorter rock is 18.5 feet in height. Commissioner Engle asked if the pool' would primarily be a summer use. Staff stated yes. 5. Chairman Quill asked what the finish grade would be for the lazy river and pool. Staff stated in this case they were refejgg I W'1 to the deck area at the base of the rock feature. It is not N Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 water level which is approximately six inches lower. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated the splash pool for water slide feature is approximately four feet below grade. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Pena, consultant for the La Quinta Resort, gave a presentation on the history of the Hotel. Mr. Paul McCormick, General Manager of the La Quinta Hotel, gave a presentation on the effects of the Hotel in the community and the proposed project. 7. Commissioner Alderson asked the applicant the estimated time of construction, how much dirt would be exported and how many gallons water will be flushed out of the system into the water table. Mr. McCormick stated the construction should take between ten and 12 month. Mr. David Urban, CNL Hospitality Corporation and Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting, stated the export of dirt should be 12-15,000 yards from the construction of the pools. The backflush of water should be 13,500 gallons every four days going through a septic system, into percolation pits and ultimately recharge the groundwater. It is domestic water that refills the pools. 8. Commissioner Barrows asked the applicant to identify the public meetings they had held with the local residents. Mr. McCormick stated they held meetings on June 28`h and September 71h at the Resort. Notices were mailed to everyone within 500 feet within the property boundaries. They have also met with Homeowners' Association Board (HOA) board, opposing counsel, and the HOA from Santa Rosa Cove. Commissioner Barrows asked what measures they were taking to incorporate water and energy conservation into the project. Mr. McCormick spoke to the landscaping plans and how energy conservations measures would be taken in regard to the plant material. Mr. Urban stated water conservation is a concern and cost issue for the Resort. The pools operate on a closed loop system. They recharge from the splash pool area. It is not new water that is constantly being discharged out. Most of the area is hardscape and will continue to be. They do not have a lot of high water plant users. They will be centralizing the mechanical equipment and they will be at higher elevations to minimize pump sizes which will reduce noise as well as being enQA0194 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 efficient. They can also segregate the active pool area from the formal pool area. Commissioner Barrows asked if the pump system would be state-of-the-art with respect to energy conservation. Mr. Urban stated that was the focal point of their design. 9. Commissioner Engle asked if the landscaping plans complied with CVWD requirements. Mr. McCormick stated yes. Commissioner Engle asked about security issues. Mr. McCormick explained their security system as to who is patrolling which streets/areas. Commissioner Engle asked if the pools/slides could be seen from Eisenhower Drive. Mr. McCormick stated they would not be seen from Eisenhower Drive or Avenida Obregon. 10. Chairman Quill asked about noise attenuation from the pumps especially from the wave actuator. Mr. McCormick explained how the pumps would be under -ground and insulated to reduce the noise. Mr. Bob Robby, noise consultant, stated the mechanical equipment is located inside the mountain to provide a lot of attenuation. The wave generator, the venture which creates the wave is below the surface of the water so there will be no audible noise. Chairman Quill asked about the length of the construction phase in particular how they would handle the parking and noise. Mr. McCormick stated the Hotel will be operating during the construction phase so they will be sensitive to the length of time it will take to construct the project as well as any noise issues. Chairman Quill asked about the complaints they had received regarding the traffic problems along Avenida Obregon. Mr. McCormick stated their on -site security has been increased and they will continue to ticket those who are violating the parking requirements. They are also trying to improve their reaction time to remove the violators. Chairman Quill asked if the lack of tennis courts will be addressed. Mr. McCormick stated the tennis program is a viable part of their business, but the play has decreased over time. Their plans are to enhance the remaining existing courts as well as adding courts elsewhere on their property. Chairman Quill asked about the finish water surface elevation of the pool and lazy river at 43 feet; how does this relate to the rock mountain structure. The finish floor elevations of the adjacent tennis villas at about 49.5 feet which makes the water surface approximately 5.5 feet below the two-story tennis villas to the north. He is trying to understand the height of the 28 foot mountain as it relathp4l&� 4 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 the tennis villas. Mr. McCormick stated they measured them and the tennis villas to the top of the chimneys is about 29.5 feet. Chairman Quill asked how that 28 foot elevation relates to the 43 foot water surface elevation. Ms. Anne Guillebeaux, EDSA, landscape architect for the site, stated that in the southwestern corner of the tennis villa site, -the adjacent grade at the base of the Villas is 46 feet and the adjacent grade at the pool deck is 46 feet. Chairman Quill stated the plans show the finish floor of the first floor of the Villas is 49.5 feet. Mr. Barret Bruchhauser, MDS Engineering, stated they would be at an elevation of 49.5. Chairman Quill asked what does the 28 foot height elevation of the mountain relate to is it related to the 46- feet or the water elevation. Mr. Bruchhauser stated the top of the mountain is actually 75 feet above sea level. Chairman Quill stated that therefore, the top of the buildings will be the same as the top of the mountain peak. Mr. Bruchhauser stated that was true. Chairman Quill asked how the rocks would be treated to appear real. Ms. Guillebeaux stated they have drafted contracts with detailed specifications that the contractor will be held to. Chairman Quill asked if the intention is to mimic what is in the Cove. Ms. Guillebeaux stated yes. Chairman Quill asked about the requirement of the Fire Department for a rear access to the pool equipment. Mr. Urban stated it will be taken care of on site and they have asked for an alternate site. Chairman Quill asked how the pool users would be identified. Mr. McCormick explained how people would gain entrance to the pool and how they would be screened to ensure only those who have access are allowed in. They must have proof of registration or membership before entering. 11. Chairman Alderson asked how guests of a member would be allowed. Mr. Urban stated they have not identified how this will be handled yet. The member cannot pay a fee to have their guest attend. If they are a registered guest, they would have access. Mr. McCormick clarified that when he stated earlier that tennis courts would be added to their property, he was referring to the Citrus Course property. 12. Commissioner Barrows asked about the trees shown on top of the rock mountain that are probably 12 feet high and how this would blend with the local landscaping. Mr. Urban stated a recommendation was to incorporate some planting elements to illustrate a realistic landscape to create a lush desert oasis feel and not just have bare rocks. Commissioner Barrows stated '1�� 5 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 concern is that if they are trying to blend these that to add 12+ feet on top of the mountain may affect the views of the neighbors and may not be the best way to go. Mr. Urban stated it is not their intent to add 12-foot trees. They do not intend to obstruct any views. Commissioner Barrows stated there is a residential environment surrounding the resort and this is a typical resort; how has it worked in other areas. Mr. McCormick stated that one of the benefits of being a part of Hilton is that they have a lot of properties that operate in different environments. He went on to describe how a pool with a slides works in their other facilities. Commissioner Barrows asked about special event purposes such as weddings; how often would these occur and would there a cut off time. Mr. McCormick stated the cutoff time for the water feature is 6:00 p.m. They currently utilize space within the hotel for special events without complaints. 13. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Quill asked if there was any other public comment. Roger and Madeline Lolley, 77-317 Avenida Fernando, stated they live at the Tennis Villas and were not notified correctly of the meetings. As they were not notified in a timely manner. This project will affect their property values. They will be losing rental fees during the construction time; will they be compensated for the lack of rentals during the construction of the project? This is a water park, not a signature pool. It is, foolish to think people will come here because of a water slide. This project will detract from the full time people who come here for a quiet environment. Even though the numbers are right does not mean it is morally right to do it. 14. Mr. Wayne Guralinick, Corporate Counsel for the Enclave, Tennis Villas, and Los Estados, which surround the proposed project. He reviewed an aerial of the site. Staff would not have brought this project forward to the Commission if it was a stand-alone project with 14-foot setbacks from residential homes. There is no doubt this is a water park that belongs in an industrial area. They want to be good neighbors. At a minimum there should be substantial continuance to have the applicant meet with the HOAs to come up with substantial mitigation and less of the intensity. They recognize the Hotel might need to renovate some of the tennis courts and add some water features, but not a water slide at this scale. 000197 6 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 15. Ms. Marie Mack, Esq., attorney for the surrounding residential homeowners, stated the technical studies provided by the applicant are grossly inadequate. This project should be denied and reanalyzed due to the close proximity to the residences. Ms. Mack went over the issues stated in her letter of February 12. 2007. 16. Ms. Kay Wollf, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, representing the Cove Association, raised issues regarding landscaping on the west side of Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and the bridge, property owned by the La Quinta Resort. The City has cited the Resort in order to have this landscaping restored to its original condition. It is still inadequate and not fixed. They would like to request that if this project is approved they should be required to upgrade the landscape including the chain link fence with a living fence, and trees for shade that would create an inviting image to the Cove residents. 17. Mr. Jack McDonald, 49-035 Calle Flora, stated they want the hotel to continue to be successful. They support the amenities of the hotel but also want the community to be a good place to live. Second they are concerned that the proposed water park will hurt the hotel and nearby communities. The noise study inadequately addresses the actual noise that will be generated from the park. Third, there has been inadequate time to evaluate the impact of this water park. More time is needed to evaluate it properly. He has only had ten days to review the noise study and if they had adequate time, they would probably find the same issues with the traffic study. Fourth, they request the Site Development Permit be denied. 18. Ms. Judy Ely, 76-972 Calle Mazatlan, stated they bought their property as a tennis resort. Imagine their disappointment when they found out that the tennis courts would be reduced by 40% as well as the addition of a water park right in the middle. The current recreation uses can be divided into two parts; pool and tennis uses. These uses are located away from the residential uses. To understand the density she counted the number of lounge chairs shown around the pool and it came out eleven times the population density of the tennis courts. Eleven times the people means significantly more noise. The two rock mountains are the same height as the tennis villas which means their views will be obstructed. A water park in a residential area is not tolerable. (I N I N 7 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 19. Mr. William McCane, 79-205 Fox Run, moved to this location out of Santa Rosa Cove due to the amount of noise coming from the Hotel activities. The notice sent out regarding this hearing was confusing and incorrect in its definition. It sounds like the use has already been approved. He also does not understand how the notice can state there will be no new significant environmental impacts. He does not understand how the Community Development Department can come to this conclusion. This is a major redevelopment involving the demolition of about half of the available tennis courts, large swimming pools as well as walkways and parking totaling 195 square feet of demolition. It also includes six months of construction noise and fumes in an area that already has problems with traffic and safety. Once completed this will be a full scale waterpark in the middle of a pre -established residential district generating traffic, parking, noise, and light impacts. The issues of compatibility with adjoining uses and the right to a quiet environment as well as reduction of property values. There has been an evolution of a Hotel, but there has also been an evolution of the residential uses adjoining the Hotel that has not been mentioned in the findings. This project does not belong in this location. 20. Mr. William Puget, 77-600 Avenida Fernando, stated he lives directly across from the conference center at the Hotel. They have lived here for 20 years and strongly object to the water park. It is inconceivable that there are no significant impacts. The notion that the users of the pool will be limited to only guests of the hotel and membership is not true. They have heard that the Estates at Point Happy are also offering memberships with access to the Hotel amenities. There may be other developments who also are offering memberships as well. Who is going to enforce the users of the pool? It is an illusion that there will be a controlled access. He urges the Commission to vote against this project. 21. Mr. John Lissberger, 77-385 Loma Vista in the Mountain Estates, stated he has lived here for 20 years and has been disappointed with the City. The people who live here are abused. This historic Hotel is slowly being eroded and encroached upon. They were promised that the Mountain Course would stay a private course. Since KSL bought 00 p 1 g g Hotel, now the course is not private. Avenida Fernando is a E: Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 private road and multiple uses such as trucks have been using it. He would respectively ask that it be declined. 22. Ms. Mary Jane O'Connor, 77-343 Avenida Fernando, stated the hotel uses this area for most of their parties, weddings, bands. She has called the Hotel to complain on numerous times about the noise and has received no response. The pool is to have limited access with the gates locked and she knows there are numerous people that have been in there from outside the area. The parking spaces are taken by vendors and parking is not enforced. They state they will be planting trees on top of the mountain that will block their views. She has a great concern about the traffic that will be generated by the project. 23. Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Via Sierra, president of Mountain Estates HOA, stated that from where lives at the tennis villas she could stand on her deck and dive into the lazy river. Her concern is the number of trucks lined up to make their deliveries at 7:00 a.m. What about all the other condo projects that bought membership into the Hotel Club. How will they all get to the pool? How are they going to get to their homes with all this additional traffic? They already fight the traffic just to get home. 24. Mr. Rick Bylsk, 76-980 Avenida Fernando, President of the Los Estadoes HOA, stated he recognizes the benefits and successes of the Hotel. Their properties are tied very closely to the success of the Hotel because of the amenities offered. They were concerned when they learned about the signature pool, as there isn't even a definition of a signature pool. This is a water park or a morphing of the Hotel's quiet ambiance. Looking at the pool area with over 200 lounge chairs that will be increased to 700 is a strong impact. He would strongly encourage the Commission to deny this project. 25. James Carley, 77-303 Mazatlan, stated he has been a homeowner for 15 years and is against the pool because of the impact of additional traffic and noise. He purchased his home for the tranquility. A 30-foot water slide is not below grade and not tranquil. 26. Jeff Nagelberg, 49-045 Calle Flora, stated his concern about the timeline of the project. They will not be able to compl� 7 t1 this project in ten months. People in Santa Rosa Cove ha a "' l' 9 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 already had water table issues. If this percolation system is faulty in any way it will cause remarkable damage. Will he be forced to listen to a movie when he sits out at his pool. Living in the Cove you know how noise will rebound off the mountains. The idea that this project will not impede on them, is ridiculous. He urges the Commission to at least delay the project and ask CNL to move the project further back onto their own property. 27. Mr. Bram White, 77-631 Los Arboles, stated he too is concerned with property values, safety, security, traffic and noise. Hearing this project characterized as a water park, he has taken his children to Raging Waters and he would not want that located here. This is not a water park and will not be open to the general public. If it were he would be strongly opposed. In terms of traffic, if it is open only to the Hotel guests and members, the Hotel is limited number of rooms and can only sell that number of rooms. He does not see all the noise concerns that are being expressed. He hears kids making noise in the pools in his neighborhood and they will make noise wherever they are. Construction is taking place all over the City as well as at the Hotel and it does go away. He would ask everyone to view this in the big picture that the concerns are a little overblown. 28. Mr. Bill Bresnaham, 78-420 Calle Felipe, stated he is a member of the Club. He has found that the Hotel has been very reluctant to enforce their rules at the pools and tennis courts. They will need to change their system if they are going to improve this. How will they be forced to live up to what they state they are going to do? Will the City's Code Enforcement Department take care of the parking problems along Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando. 29. Mr. Tom Laverty, 48-805 Via Linda in the Mountain Estates. He has two issues. In the June 281h presentation they were told that the competition for this type of amusement park ranged from 2 to 2.5 acres. This is proposed on 4.7 acres. They want to work with the Hotel, but they need to work together. They have asked them to speak to their HOA. If all 3,000 of the people who live in the area would go to dinner one time a year at the Hotel it would cover the 15,000 covers they will get from the Hotel guests. 000201 10 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 30. Mr. Jay Green, Mountain Estates, stated the notice says the applicant is CNL and questions and answers have been addressed to CNL. If he understands it correctly, CNL has sold the Hotel to Morgan Stanley, and CNL will be gone. Who is the applicant when CNL is leaving town? Is a corporate interest going to trump the interests of the 200 odd residents who are here tonight? 31. Mr. Paul Keye, 49-991 Mazatlan, stated he is impressed with the Hotel and is concerned with what they will bring in next. He is surprised that this development would not require any additional reports. The Tennis Tournaments were previously held at the Hotel. What drove the migration of the Tennis Tournament championships to Indian Wells? Would you buy a home next to a signature pool. He hopes he did not. 32. Mr. Steve Davis, 77-500 Avenida Fernando, stated the Resort does not own Avenida Fernando and it is not a public road. He and Mr. Puget own a portion of the road. Their portion goes to approximately to the middle of the road. The road is about 24- 25 feet wide. He displayed pictures of trucks that travel. down Avenida Fernando and the problems that are incurred because of this traffic. The truck in the picture is 70 feet long. They deal with approximately 20-30 of these trucks a day. The truck is stopped because it hit his wall and got stuck in the driveway. The truck actually hit his wall twice trying to deliver to the hotel. He informed the City that he is currently in litigation that the Resort owners have overburdened their easement rights on this road and they are asking for extinguishment of the easement. The City may want to consider that if they grant rights to this project, there is an act of litigation that is asking for extinguishment of their right of the road. He was never asked if they had any objection to use of the road. Staff referenced an EIR that was done in 1975. There were seven other means of access into the Resort at that time. If there are 6,000 cars a day going down Avenida Fernando is that still an adequate EIR. 33. Mr. Thomas Harms 79-605 Cetrino, stated one of the reasons we have zoning, planning and environmental assessments is to ensure there consistency in compatibility between housing. What was true in 1975 is that staff was talking about what the environmental concerns were and that is not necessarily today. This land has been extensively developed and as part of 11 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 that development those same issues were addressed and satisfied. What is being asked at this meeting is a request to change that judgement that was made. In his opinion there are two questions that are appropriate to be raised. One is whether or not it is good for the applicant to make money if that is a change in the decision of the City at that time. Rather the question is, is the change being requested material. Here there is a proposal to change the density of use substantially; a proposal to change the noise significantly; and a proposal to change the lighting. Are those changes adverse to the existing property owners who were in the prior environmental assessment promised one thing. The response would be that the change will be adverse and because there is a material adverse change, he does not believe that the finding that there is no adverse change is appropriate and this application should be denied. 34. Mr. Ron Olson, 77-905 Laredo Court, stated he is opposed to the water park for three reasons: traffic, the parking situation, and noise on Obregon. He is a member of Tennis and Fitness Club at Resort and has found it is very tough to find a parking space. He therefore has resorted to different ways to travel to the Resort. Avenida Obregon is so narrow that two cars can hardly pass each other. Walking is another means of getting there, but you find that two cars cannot pass. The original EIR did not consider the size of the vehicles that are now being driven. The golf cart is another option to travel to the site but there have been instances when they too have almost been hit by a CVWD truck. What provisions have been made for golf carts and bicycles to travel to the Resort as well as park at the Resort? Noise is another issue as he can hear the band that plays every afternoon at his house which is % of a mile away. What happens if the water park fails? What will happen to this "white elephant"? Also, will it be open to the public? 35. Mr. Scott Holmes, 77-490 Calle Cadiz, stated he owns two lots in the Enclave and Mountain Estates and asked that the application be denied and we all go home. His concern is that the extra traffic at the turn around area is going to cause the residents to the Mountain Estates to wait to enter their gate to get home. If the purpose is to increase occupancy during the summer, then why be open at Thanksgiving and Christmas? It is one thing to say noise levels meet standards and to live next door to it. How many of the Commissioners have been to SC00020 `7 12 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 City and how many would like to live next door to this? 36. Mr. Ed Mittelbusher, 77-333 Calle Mazatlan, asked if the Hotel feels that noise and light are not an issue, why not move it closer to Rinker Pool where it would only affect or not affect their guests? Why put it in the middle of a residential area. Yesterday there were at least six Morgan Stanley executives touring the facilities and there are none here at this meeting. Do they not want to hear what the people want to say? With the removal of the tennis courts they asked if they would be receiving a reduction in their tennis dues. They were told no, they would be raised. 37. Mr. Hayes O'brien, 48-840 Eisenhower Drive, stated he is member of the Club and is a real estate developer in Minnesota. He understand the right of a developer to develop their property, but he is concerned that this use of their property is tempered by the rights of surrounding property owners. The rights of the adjoining property owners are being trampled by the adjoining property owners. This is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong time. Please deny project. 38. Mr. Richard Fredericks, 49-875 Avenida Obregon, stated this is a safety disaster on the City's hands. He then gave pictures he had taken that were examples of the situation that currently exists along Avenida Obregon. Avenida Obregon is essentially blocked with bumper to bumper cars. Someone is going to get killed. This is the most ill advised proposal. The Resort does not keep its word. Tentative Tract Map 28545 showed that Avenida Obregon was to remain open and it was cut in half without public hearings. The parking on the tract map was reconfigured on Vista Flores from parallel parking to back out parking. There is no parking lot that meets the Zoning Code. Either the City cannot or will not enforce it. This water park will be bringing hundred or people to an area with no sidewalks. He is an abutting property owner and has an easement and his easement was cut in half from 40 feet to 20 feet without a public hearing or asking him his rights. The Resort does not police itself. You would think several citations would have been issued and yet only five citations were issued. Emergency vehicles could never get through. The Police say it is private property, but a fire lane is a fire lane and should be patrolled. He submitted the Property Rights provision of TT 28545 t were not adhered to by the Resort. He then submittedb O 2 r1 V 4 13 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 Council Minutes into the record. Avenida Obregon is a collector street and is to be 40 feet wide. When you do not comply with the Zoning Code you will have a disaster. 39. Mr. Joseph A. Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, stated he agrees with Kay Wolff in regard to the berm on Eisenhower Drive that has not been maintained for 20 years. The Resort has not been a good neighbor no matter who has owned it. He would urge that a condition be added to this project to require the Resort to fix and maintain the berm along Eisenhower Drive. 40. Ms. Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Via Sierra, questioned the season CNL says the park will be used. What do they determine to be the "season"? It is not just a summer time, it will be more than just the summer months. People use their pools in the shoulder seasons as well. 41. Mr. Phil Motts, Santa Rosa Cove, stated there are 2500 members to this cove and everything stated here should be multiplied by that number. 42. Mr. Jay Vaden 77-471 Loma Vista, stated he is concerned about Avenida Fernando because there are no sidewalk and very poor access. The triangle section crossing Avenida Obregon needs to be improved. He almost hit a lady walking in this area. There is also a new project that is being process across from the Tennis Villas. This is a matter of promotional sales. He loves the Hotel but does not like the way it has been run. 43. Ms. Leslie Fredericks, 49-875 Avenida Obregon, stated the La Quinta Hotel does not own all the area on Avenida Obregon. If she heard correctly, they are proposing another new gate on Avenida Obregon and she would like to know if this is true. Chairman Quill stated there will be no gate unless there is an issue and if that issue cannot be resolved by first placing a guard at this location. Ms. Fredericks stated she is a single- family two acre residents trapped in tourist commercial. If this gate is built, she is cemented her future as being a part of the La Quinta Hotel. 44. Mr. John Duggen 48-770 Via Linda, stated Mr. McCormick has stated the access to, and use of, this water park will��:�� restricted to guests of the hotel. He would like to have a c ` 14 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 definition of what a hotel guest is. He is particularly concerned that guest passes will not be given on a day basis. Will the guests be defined as being occupants of the Hotel? Chairman Quill stated that is the understanding before the Commission. 45. Mr. Ted Newell 77-160 Avenida Fernando, stated the 2500 members that do not use the facility all that often. The parking studies overlook the significance of the members who do not use the membership. If they put a water park in, he would be taking his grandchildren to the park which is another impact on the traffic. If you look at all those who will now be using the pool, there is the traffic increase. 46. Mr. Paul McCormick, La Quinta Resorts, stated this has been a resort for eight years. All the residents know the Resort is there. Public notifications were addressed to everyone within five hundred feet. Construction inconveniences are considered by themselves in regard to their guests. They believe they can keep the charm of La Quinta with these changes. It will not degrade the community. The noise study has been extensively studied. The issues with the berm on Eisenhower Drive that was referred to will be addressed. Their director has met with the City and they have received quotes to fix the area adding vegetation and decomposed granite. There is a potential acquisition of the Hotel; however, he is an employee of Hilton and not CNL and Hilton will continue to market the Hotel. The Hotel has many more resources to solve problems that CNL did not. In regard to property values, construction will have an affect. The elements they are constructing in the signature pool will enhance their guests stay. It does not have all the water park amenities and therefore is not a water park. Members and children will be allowed to use the pool if they are living at home and are under 23 years of age. In regard to police calls, there are more calls made in the neighborhoods by volume than at the Hotel. Every time they have received a call they do respond with a security follow-up. They have added additional security to address these problems. They try to be a good neighbor. In regard to lighting and landscaping issues, it will be low level lighting as compared to the tennis light that now exists. 47. Mr. Richard Zeilinga, Legal Counsel for La Quinta Resort, stated that with the threat of litigation it is important to make td1wQt q record clear on some issues. With respect to the context it is 15 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 important to note that there is a Resort, a commercial operation, that is on -going and has been on -going for 70 years and mixed in are residences that are a more recent vintage. This is a conflict and is very common where this is this type of mix. Why isn't there pro -active planning to deal with this issue? In this particular case, there was. He displayed portions of an Agreement that was for the residents at 49-454 Avenida Obregon. This Agreement talks about in great detail that the Hotel has the right to install any trees, landscaping or construct any improvements at any location within Tennis property which could be in near proximity to any lot within the project including the property. It also acknowledges that the buyer agrees that the seller makes no warranties, representations that the Tennis Club properties will be maintained and operated in the manner that existed or was contemplated at the time of purchase. It also states the buyer for himself, herself, or related parties hereby acknowledges the potential for nuisances created by or arising by the Hotel property including without limitation odors, noises, traffic, congestions and other nuisances arising from other operations, landscaping and maintenance of the Hotel property, early and late night events, etc., etc. The buyer assumes the risk of any creation of maintenance or trespass or nuisance created by or arising in connection with Hotel activities or any matters described above. This Agreement was signed by the buyer. This is a standard form agreement used for the purchase of new property. He cannot represent that when properties are resold that every buyer shared with subsequent buyers that they had executed this type of agreement. It does show the planning and pro -thought that went into dealing with the issues raised tonight. They contend based on the studies they prepared, there isn't a problem when you compare what was originally approved in the EIR on the project in 1975 and all the updates with the increases in units and the changes that have occurred since then. There have been five updates and the City has been involved in all the environmental updates since then. In regard to the noticing, not only did the City notice the area within 500 feet they are required to, it was sent out to the entire boundary of the Resort property. This is above and beyond what is required. In regard to noise, there were three areas that were studied. The study is'� overly conservative because when the study was completed, all of those factors and changes made in regard to the concerns raised by the neighbors, are not assumed in the study. The 'study did not assume that all these slides would be closed dui°tf( 16 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 open, or that the mass had been split and brought down. The study did not consider the lazy river was lowered to reduce the noise impact. On traffic as there are no Hotel room increases, they did not believe hard quantitative counts were necessary, but they did it anyway and on parking and capacity, there is excessive capacity. He presented a photo taking of the parking area at 100% occupancy at 5:00 p.m. which showed no excessive parking. In regard to the Morgan House issue, the existing context is not a pristine context. The Morgan House is totally screened with an eight foot wall, and hedge. In regard to views they are not a significant impact by law. Finally, the City did not prepare a Negative Declaration, it prepared an Addendum to an EIR. This is an update to an existing EIR. 48. There being no further public comment Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. 49. Commissioner Alderson applauded Mr. McCormick's effort to take care of the landscape issues on Avenida Obregon. He recognizes not everyone is going to be happy. He had reviewed over 600 letters in regard to this project and a lot of consideration has been given to this project. The concerns raised are important and legal ramifications are important. He stands by staff and legal counsel in that the City is within its rights to review and act on this application, but he believes we are putting in jeopardy this grand Hotel of La Quinta. The business plan says it is a financially viable plan. If this were not successful the fall back is dire and it would cost the owners millions. It is an exchange of recreational uses. Taking it all into consideration, is it good for La Quinta? At this point he is not sure he could support the project. 50. Commissioner Barrows stated she would consider continuing the application. In looking at the conditions they relate to the physical aspect of the project. She asked if the park would be used from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Staff clarified that was the time the applicant stated the park would be open. Commissioner Barrows asked if there was a more minimal use discussed with the applicant as this appears to be the high end of the use. Staff stated discussions were not held on alternatives. Commissioner Barrows stated she too has seen the transition of the Hotel, and she would like to see oq�200 alternatives to the current design. VV VV 17 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 51. Commissioner Engle stated he too believes this issue needs to be resolved at this meeting. Everyone is opposed to change, but he supports this project. People are coming and putting their money back into the community. The issue of the landscaping maintenance along Eisenhower Drive, however needs to be resolved and strong code enforcement needs to be in place to see that it does not happen again. He believes it is a good project. 52. Chairman Quill stated he appreciates everyone who came out to voice their opinion. He too has been a resident for a long time and has seen the transition of this Hotel. However, he believes not only does the Hotel have the right to change, but it has the obligation to do so. It is important to allow it to grow. If it fails, they have the right to tear it down and try something different; and this is their right. The development of the City and the golf communities around the Hotel were developed as a result of the Hotel. In regard to this, conditions need to be added to address security and over parking concerns. The berm along Eisenhower Drive needs to be addressed and a full landscape design submitted for approval. From an operation perspective Eisenhower Drive and the bike path should be addressed. A specific written operating plan for the parking lot and security should be added as a condition to be approved by the City. This will be a beautiful plan and the impacts will not be significant. 53. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-007 recommending certification of an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR No. 41), and subsequent CEQA compliance documents, for La Quinta Cove Golf Club revised Specific Plan 121-E (1975), as amended, prepared for Site Development Permit 2006-865, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. 54. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Chairman Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-008 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865, as recommended and amended: 000209 rV Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 a. Condition added: A written operations plan related to the pool and Avenida Fernando for security for parking shall be submitted and approved by staff. b. Condition added: A landscaping plan for Eisenhower Drive and the bike path to the maintenance facility shall be submitted and approved by staff. C. Condition added: The landscaping on top of the rock mountains features shall be restricted to a height limit. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Engle and Chairman Quill. NOES: Commissioners Alderson and Barrows. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. The motion failed. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the policy of the City is that in a tie vote, the application is automatically a continuance. The missing member would be required to listen to a recording of the meeting and review all the material prepared and submitted. The options before the Commission are to continue the matter and allow the missing member to vote, or send the application to the City Council with the vote as taken. Discussion followed regarding the options before the Commission. 55. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Engle to adopt Minute Motion 2007-move the application forward to the Council with the vote as taken and with the added conditions. Unanimously approved. Chairman Quill recessed the meeting at 11:04 p.m. and reconvened at 11:09 p.m. B. Site Development Permit 2006-874; a request of Komar Investments, L.L.C. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for seven commercial buildings, for the property located south of Highway 111 at Depot Drive. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Les Johnson presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 000210 19 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked why the retention basins are not on the site plan. Staff stated they were temporary during the construction of the Costco building. They will go away. Commissioner Alderson stated Building "A" has a 33 foot high architectural element. Is this a legal elevation because it is set back 150 feet? Staff stated the height is consistent with the Specific Plan. 3. Commissioner Engle asked if the applicant was in agreement with all the conditions. Staff stated the applicant would respond to that condition. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Clint Knox, representing the applicant, stated they were available for questions. 5. Chairman Quill asked if there was a potential for an access that would cross over the Evacuation Channel. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated her recollection was that we required an access on the easterly edge at a point to be determined in the future if it was feasible to get to Jefferson Street. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated it was not added to the Specific Plan. 6. Commissioner Barrows asked how the particular feature on Building "B" would provide shade. Mr. Knox stated it is an architectural element, but it would provide shade. 7. Chairman Quill asked if shading was provided on the plans. Staff noted the west elevations have 12-15 foot trellis covers; the east elevations have less. 8. Mr. Knox stated they are requesting a change to three conditions in regard to the Costco driveway which the Public Works Department has agreed to. Staff stated that was correct. 9. Commissioner Alderson asked if the median allows someone to exit Parcel 4 and go left. Mr. Knox explained you can make a left turn, but it is not a dedicated left turn. It is a right in/right out. The median will be modified. 000211 P Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 10. There being no further questions of staff and no other public comment, Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Engle/Barrows to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-009 approving Site Development Permit 2006- 874, as recommended and amended: a. Condition 81. A linear hedge with low maintenance plants shall be installed. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. C. Sign Application 2006-1078; a request of Imperial Sign Company, Inc. for consideration of a proposed sign program for permanent business identification signage and monument sign for Dunes Plaza, located at 79-640/700 Highway 11 1 . 1. Commissioner Engle noted he had a potential conflict of interest and left the dais. 2. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Assistant Planner Yvonne Franco presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked what staff objected to on the monument sign. Staff explained the applicant did not provide enough detail and the end elevation did not indicate the width. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated it is just an image that does not give any detail. The Center is very detailed and the monument sign is very simple. Staff is recommending it be redesigned and approved by staff. 4. There being no further questions of staff, the applicant not being present, and no other public comment, Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. 21 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Alderson/Barrow to adopt Minute Motion 2007-003 approving Sign Application 2006-1078, as recommended. Unanimously adopted. Commissioner Engle rejoined the Commission. VI. BUSINESS ITEM: A. Continued - Notice of Public Nuisance Case No. 2006-5204; a request of Jeffrey S. and Ardis L. Manning for an appeal of a Public Nuisance regarding the violation of a recreational vehicle encroaching on the City right-of-way without a permit, parking in a location not zoned for vehicular parking, being improperly stored on a residential property, and a patio cover that violates the exterior side yard setback for the property located at 52-715 Avenida Navarro. 1. Chairman Quill asked for the staff report. Senior Code Compliance Officer Anthony Moreno presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked if the appellant had a permit for the spa cover. Staff stated none was ever obtained and the appellant stated the cover was there when they bought the house. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the appellants would like to address the Commission. Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Manning, 52-715 Avenida Navarro, stated the patio cover had been removed and was no longer an issue. In regard to the RV, he believes he meets the Municipal Code in regard to the Code requirements. 4. Chairman Quill asked staff for clarification on what was read from the Code by the appellant. Planning Manager Les Johnson stated the location of the RV is not immediately adjacent to or parallel to the driveway as required by the Code. 5. Ms. Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, stated she thought the RV needed some kind of shading. What offended her was that it was in complete view of the public. 000,213 22 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 6. Mr. Joe Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, stated he dislikes seeing the RV, and reported it to the City. It does not comply with the intent of the City's Ordinance. RVs need to be screened to not be in view of the street. 7. Ms. Ardis Maning, stated the Code does not require the RV to be screened or behind a wall. They offered to plant additional trees and were told by Code Compliance it was not necessary. 8. Commissioner Engle asked if this was within what the Code allows. Staff stated it is within inches. Mr. Maning stated when he parks the vehicle it can be within the one inch and yet another time he may be 1.5 inches over. 9. Commissioner Alderson stated the point is that it is unattractive and asked the definition of a "driveway". City Attorney Kathy Jenson read the definition of a driveway. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to adopt Minute Motion 2007-004 upholding the determination of Public Nuisance Case No. 2006-52. Unanimously approved. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Report on the City Council meeting of February 6, 2007. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Barrows to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on February 27, 2007. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 12:09 a.m. on February 13, 2007. Respectfully submitted, C1;� B*.Ser, ExecutiveSecretary Cinta, California I 23 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 27, 2007 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Quill who asked Commissioner Barrows to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Ed Alderson, Katie Barrows, Jim Engle and Chairman Paul Quill. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to excuse Commissioner Daniels. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Les Johnson, Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen, Assistant Planner Jay Wuu, and Secretary Carolyn Walker II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: Chairman Quill asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of February 13, 2007. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Sign Application 2003-720, Amendment No. 1; Consideration of an Amendment to an existing Sign Program allowing the placement of special event banners. 1. Chairman Quill opened the Public Hearing. Assistant Planner Jay Wuu presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked if the sign exhibits were computer generated. Staff said yes. 00021�X GAMDOCSTC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 3. Commissioner Engle asked about the proportions of the sign. Ms. Leslie Locken, Property Manager of Old Town La Quinta, 78-150 Main Street, La Quinta, stated there was a discrepancy in the measurements used and they have been corrected. She showed an example of a five by 18-foot banner, and a 30-foot long banner. Copies were given to the Commission. Ms. Locken said she had two issues. The first issue was the size of the lettering on the five by 18-foot banner which was 11-inches high and not easily readable as well as limited in how much verbiage could be accommodated. She requested a five by 30-foot banner as it would be more proportionate. She stated the banners at Desert Club Drive and Calle Tampico would be double -sided and a five by 18-foot banner could not be easily read. The banners have been more effective than media advertising in attracting customers to Old Town. The second issue was whether the banners could remain for three weeks prior to their Grand Opening event in late March. 4. Commissioner Alderson asked if the banner, which was noted as 20-feet off the street was at a safe height. Ms. Locken replied truck height was 16-feet and the 20-foot height should be safe. 5. Commissioner Engle said he was in favor of the special event banners, as long as there was no clutter. He agreed five feet by 18-feet was too small. He said the five by 30-foot would be better as long as it was not offensive and in good taste. He had hesitations about the three week time period and thought one week should be enough. He agreed with the Conditions of Approval as stated by staff for the time period. 6. Commissioner Alderson asked if a compromise of two weeks would be acceptable. Staff said they recognized this was Phase II and a new addition to Old Town and understood the need for special signage for the Grand Opening event. 7. Commissioner Alderson asked about measuring from curb to curb as opposed to street width. Staff clarified the distinction. 8. Commissioner Alderson asked about the difference between the original size requested versus what staff was recommending. Staff clarified the difference. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc 2 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 9. Chairman Quill said he did not have a problem with the five by 30- foot banner or the three week time period. He said he wanted to do anything necessary to help Old Town be successful. He said the signs were large, but if done properly and maintained they would be acceptable. The City needs to do all it can to help the vendors. 10. Commissioner Barrows concurred and stated it was an opportunity to help the vendors. 11. Chairman Quill asked about the tree signs. Ms. Locken said she was working with staff to use a kiosk or alternate display method instead of the tree signs. 12. Chairman Quill asked if there was any other public comment. There being none, Chairman Quill closed the Public Hearing. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to adopt Minute Motion 2007- 006 recommending approval of Sign Application 2003-720, Amendment No. 1, as recommended and amended: A. The total square footage for each of the banners that span across Main Street shall be no greater than 150 square feet (30-feet x 5-five). The applicant shall install the approved banners at the approved locations. B. The event -specific banners shall be erected no sooner than three weeks (21 days) prior to the event (which shall have an approved Temporary Use Permit or Village Use Permit), and removed no later than two days after the conclusion of the event. Each special event sign/banner shall be applied for as part of the TUP/VUP application for the subject event. C. The use of the special event banners in Old Town La Quinta shall be limited to 180 days per calendar year. D. Letters shall not be closer than six inches to the edge (top/bottom/sides) of banners. Maximum letter size shall be 18 inches in height. 000117 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. B. Environmental Assessment 2006-575 and Zone Change 2006-129; Consideration to certify a Negative Declaration and a zone change from RM/17/1 Medium Density Residential, 17 foot height, single story to RM120/5/10117/1 in order to reduce the existing 15 foot rear yard setback to ten feet. Located south of Avenida La Fonda, north of Avenida Nuestra, west of Washington Street, and east of Calle Guatemala. 1. Chairman Quill opened the Public Hearing. Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the staff report which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Mark Green, 51-420 Calle Jacumba, spoke in favor of changing the setback and said this change would provide more opportunities for better home design on these lots. 3. Chairman Quill asked if anyone else wanted to speak on this project, there being none, the public hearing was closed. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-009 recommending to the City Council certification of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2006-575 as submitted. ROLL CALL:AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. 5. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-010 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2006- 129 as submitted. ROLL CALL:AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: None 000218 G:\wPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc 4 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: Commissioners discussed the upcoming Planning Commissioner Conference. Commissioners Engle, Alderson and Chairman Quill stated they would be attending. Commissioner Barrows was unsure at this time. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Engel to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on March 13, 2007. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 7:36 p.m. on February 27, 2007. Respectfully submitted, Carolyn We er, Secretary City of La Quinta, California 00®t2119 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc 5 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: Alp -- MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 13, 2007 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was reconvened at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Quill who asked Commissioner Alderson to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Ed Alderson, Katie Barrows, Jim Engle, and Chairman Paul Quill. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to excuse Commissioner Daniels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Doug Evans, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Planning Manager Les Johnson, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Assistant Planner Yvonne Franco, Senior Code Compliance Officer Anthony Moreno, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Quill asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of January 23, 2007. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 2006-579 and Site Development Permit 2006-865; a request of CNL Desert Resorts, L. P. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a signature pool facility, for the property located on the west side of Avenida Obregon, approximately 150-feet south of Avenida Fernando, within the La Quinta Resort. `. 1. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file inQV019? Community Development Department. Staff reviewed he G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-13-07.doe Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 revised Public Works Department conditions. Mr. Tony Locacciato, Impact Sciences, the City's CEQA consultant, gave a presentation on the EIR Addendum. Community Development Director Doug Evans gave a history of the Resort, traffic reports and parking. Staff noted each time there has been a change to the Resort the City has evaluated the environmental impacts. 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked if in the analysis of the grading would there be any import or export or soil. Staff stated there will be some export for the excavation of the proposed pools. The applicant will have the accurate export amount. Commissioner Alderson asked the timeframe is for the construction. Staff suggested the applicant would need to answer that question. Commissioner Alderson asked what future use the Morgan House would have and would it be related to this pool. Staff stated the Morgan House is technical issue. Under California law it needs to be renovated and re - enforced or demolished over time. At this time there is no proposed use associated with this project and no impact from this project on the House. Staff will be working with the applicant on all historic buildings on the property. 3. Commissioner Barrows asked staff to clarify the parking that would be eliminated and outline the entry gate turnaround area. Staff indicated the changes to the parking spaces at the entry that would be eliminated on the site plan. Commissioner Barrows asked if the rock mountain structures for the pool had any height constraints in regard to the City's height limits. Staff stated they are within the City's height limits. Commissioner Barrows asked the City's height limitations for Tourist Commercial areas. Staff stated they are allowed up to 40-feet. 4. Commissioner Engle asked the height of the southern rock feature. Staff stated it is 28 feet. Commissioner Engle asked the height of the buildings to the north of the rock features. Staff stated they are approximately 26 feet and the shorter rock is 18.5 feet in height. Commissioner Engle asked if the pool would primarily be a summer use. Staff stated yes. 5. Chairman Quill asked what the finish grade would be for the lazy river and pool. Staff stated in this case they were refer] + to the deck area at the base of the rock feature. It is notQXV } ` 2 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 water level which is approximately six inches lower. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated the splash pool for water slide feature is approximately four feet below grade. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Pena, consultant for the La Quinta Resort, gave a presentation on the history of the Hotel. Mr. Paul McCormick, General Manager of the La Quinta Hotel, gave a presentation on the effects of the Hotel in the community and the proposed project. 7. Commissioner Alderson asked the applicant the estimated time of construction, how much dirt would be exported and how many gallons water will be flushed out of the system into the water table. Mr. McCormick stated the construction should take between ten and 12 month. Mr. David Urban, CNL Hospitality Corporation and Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting, stated the export of dirt should be 12-15,000 yards from the construction of the pools. The backflush of water should be 13,500 gallons every four days going through a septic system, into percolation pits and ultimately recharge the groundwater. It is domestic water that refills the pools. 8. Commissioner Barrows asked the applicant to identify the public meetings they had held with the local residents. Mr. McCormick stated they held meetings on June 28`h and September 71h at the Resort. Notices were mailed to everyone within 500 feet within the property boundaries. They have also met with Homeowners' Association Board (HOA) board, opposing counsel, and the HOA from Santa Rosa Cove. Commissioner Barrows asked what measures they were taking to incorporate water and energy conservation into the project. Mr. McCormick spoke to the landscaping plans and how energy conservations measures would be taken in regard to the plant material. Mr. Urban stated water conservation is a concern and cost issue for the Resort. The pools operate on a closed loop system. They recharge from the splash pool area. It is not new water that is constantly being discharged out. Most of the area is hardscape and will continue to be. They do not have a lot of high water plant users. They will be centralizing the mechanical equipment and they will be at higher elevations to minimize pump sizes which will reduce noise as well as being enaftO 19 4 i1 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 efficient. They can also segregate the active pool area from the formal pool area. Commissioner Barrows asked if the pump system would be state-of-the-art with respect to energy conservation. Mr. Urban stated that was the focal point of their design. 9. Commissioner Engle asked if the landscaping plans complied with CVWD requirements. Mr. McCormick stated yes. Commissioner Engle asked about security issues. Mr. McCormick explained their security system as to who is patrolling which streets/areas. Commissioner Engle asked if the pools/slides could be seen from Eisenhower Drive. Mr. McCormick stated they would not be seen from Eisenhower Drive or Avenida Obregon. 10. Chairman Quill asked about noise attenuation from the pumps especially from the wave actuator. Mr. McCormick explained how the pumps would be under -ground and insulated to reduce the noise. Mr. Bob Robby, noise consultant, stated the mechanical equipment is located inside the mountain to provide a lot of attenuation. The wave generator, the venture which creates the wave is below the surface of the water so there will be no audible noise. Chairman Quill asked about the length of the construction phase in particular how they would handle the parking and noise. Mr. McCormick stated the Hotel will be operating during the construction phase so they will be sensitive to the length of time it will take to construct the project as well as any noise issues. Chairman Quill asked about the complaints they had received regarding the traffic problems along Avenida Obregon. Mr. McCormick stated their on -site security has been increased and they will continue to ticket those who are violating the parking requirements. They are also trying to improve their reaction time to remove the violators. Chairman Quill asked if the lack of tennis courts will be addressed. Mr. McCormick stated the tennis program is a viable part of their business, but the play has decreased over time. Their plans are to enhance the remaining existing courts as well as adding courts elsewhere on their property. Chairman Quill asked about the finish water surface elevation of the pool and lazy river at 43 feet; how does this relate to the rock mountain structure. The finish floor elevations of the adjacent tennis villas at about 49.5 feet which makes the water surface approximately 5.5 feet below the two-story tennis villas to the north. He is trying to understand the height of the 28 foot mountain as it rela�tA n 4 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 the tennis villas. Mr. McCormick stated they measured them and the tennis villas to the top of the chimneys is about 29.5 feet. Chairman Quill asked how that 28 foot elevation relates to the 43 foot water surface elevation. Ms. Anne Guillebeaux, EDSA, landscape architect for the site, stated that in the southwestern corner of the tennis villa site,.the adjacent grade at the base of the Villas is 46 feet and the adjacent grade at the pool deck is 46 feet. Chairman Quill stated the plans show the finish floor of the first floor of the Villas is 49.5 feet. Mr. Barret Bruchhauser, MDS Engineering, stated they would be at an elevation of 49.5. Chairman Quill asked what does the 28 foot height elevation of the mountain relate to is it related to the 46- feet or the water elevation. Mr. Bruchhauser stated the top of the mountain is actually 75 feet above sea level. Chairman Quill stated that therefore, the top of the buildings will be the same as the top of the mountain peak. Mr. Bruchhauser stated that was true. Chairman Quill asked how the rocks would be treated to appear real. Ms. Guillebeaux stated they have drafted contracts with detailed specifications that the contractor will be held to. Chairman Quill asked if the intention is to mimic what is in the Cove. Ms. Guillebeaux stated yes. Chairman Quill asked about the requirement of the Fire Department for a rear access to the pool equipment. Mr. Urban stated it will be taken care of on site and they have asked for an alternate site. Chairman Quill asked how the pool users would be identified. Mr. McCormick explained how people would gain entrance to the pool and how they would be screened to ensure only those who have access are allowed in. They must have proof of registration or membership before entering. 11. Chairman Alderson asked how guests of a member would be allowed. Mr. Urban stated they have not identified how this will be handled yet. The member cannot pay a fee to have their guest attend. If they are a registered guest, they would have access. Mr. McCormick clarified that when he stated earlier that tennis courts would be added to their property, he was referring to the Citrus Course property. 12. Commissioner Barrows asked about the trees shown on top of the rock mountain that are probably 12 feet high and how this would blend with the local landscaping. Mr. Urban stated a recommendation was to incorporate some planting elements to illustrate a realistic landscape to create a lush desert oasis feel and not just have bare rocks. Commissioner Barrows stated � i 5 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 concern is that if they are trying to blend these that to add 12 + feet on top of the mountain may affect the views of the neighbors and may not be the best way to go. Mr. Urban stated it is not their intent to add 12-foot trees. They do not intend to obstruct any views. Commissioner Barrows stated there is a residential environment surrounding the resort and this is a typical resort; how has it worked in other areas. Mr. McCormick stated that one of the benefits of being a part of Hilton is that they have a lot of properties that operate in different environments. He went on to describe how a pool with a slides works in their other facilities. Commissioner Barrows asked about special event purposes such as weddings; how often would these occur and would there a cut off time. Mr. McCormick stated the cutoff time for the water feature is 6:00 p.m. They currently utilize space within the hotel for special events without complaints. 13. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Quill asked if there was any other public comment. Roger and Madeline Lolley, 77-317 Avenida Fernando, stated they live at the Tennis Villas and were not notified correctly of the meetings. As they were not notified in a timely manner. This project will affect their property values. They will be losing rental fees during the construction time; will they be compensated for the lack of rentals during the construction of the project? This is a water park, not a signature pool. It is, foolish to think people will come here because of a water slide. This project will detract from the full time people who come here for a quiet environment. Even though the numbers are right does not mean it is morally right to do it. 14. Mr. Wayne Guralinick, Corporate Counsel for the Enclave, Tennis Villas, and Los Estados, which surround the proposed project. He reviewed an aerial of the site. Staff would not have brought this project forward to the Commission if it was a stand-alone project with 14-foot setbacks from residential homes. There is no doubt this is a water park that belongs in an industrial area. They want to be good neighbors. At a minimum there should be substantial continuance to have the applicant meet with the HOAs to come up with substantial mitigation and less of the intensity. They recognize the Hotel might need to renovate some of the tennis courts and add some water features, but not a water slide at this scale. 000187 6 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 15. Ms. Marie Mack, Esq., attorney for the surrounding residential homeowners, stated the technical studies provided by the applicant are grossly inadequate. This project should be denied and reanalyzed due to the close proximity to the residences. Ms. Mack went over the issues stated in her letter of February 12, 2007. 16. Ms. Kay Wollf, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, representing the Cove Association, raised issues regarding landscaping on the west side of Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and the bridge, property owned by the La Quinta Resort. The City has cited the Resort in order to have this landscaping restored to its original condition. It is still inadequate and not fixed. They would like to request that if this project is approved they should be required to upgrade the landscape including the chain link fence with a living fence, and trees for shade that would create an inviting image to the Cove residents. 17. Mr. Jack McDonald, 49-035 Calle Flora, stated they want the hotel to continue to be successful. They support the amenities of the hotel but also want the community to be a good place to live. Second they are concerned that the proposed water park will hurt the hotel and nearby communities. The noise study inadequately addresses the actual noise that will be generated from the park. Third, there has been inadequate time to evaluate the impact of this water park. More time is needed to evaluate it properly. He has only had ten days to review the noise study and if they had adequate time, they would probably find the same issues with the traffic study. Fourth, they request the Site Development Permit be denied. 18. Ms. Judy Ely, 76-972 Calle Mazatlan, stated they bought their property as a tennis resort. Imagine their disappointment when they found out that the tennis courts would be reduced by 40% as well as the addition of a water park right in the middle. The current recreation uses can be divided into two parts; pool and tennis uses. These uses are located away from the residential uses. To understand the density she counted the number of lounge chairs shown around the pool and it came out eleven times the population density of the tennis courts. Eleven times the people means significantly more noise. The two rock mountains are the same height as the tennis villas which means their views will be obstructed. A water park in a residential area is not tolerable. (NO IS 7 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 19. Mr. William McCane, 79-205 Fox Run, moved to this location out of Santa Rosa Cove due to the amount of noise coming from the Hotel activities. The notice sent out regarding this hearing was confusing and incorrect in its definition. It sounds like the use has already been approved. He also does not understand how the notice can state there will be no new significant environmental impacts. He does not understand how the Community Development Department can come to this conclusion. This is a major redevelopment involving the demolition of about half of the available tennis courts, large swimming pools as well as walkways and parking totaling 195 square feet of demolition. It also includes six months of construction noise and fumes in an area that already has problems with traffic and safety. Once completed this will be a full scale waterpark in the middle of a pre -established residential district generating traffic, parking, noise, and light impacts. The issues of compatibility with adjoining uses and the right to a quiet environment as well as reduction of property values. There has been an evolution of a Hotel, but there has also been an evolution of the residential uses adjoining the Hotel that has not been mentioned in the findings. This project does not belong in this location. 20. Mr. William Puget, 77-600 Avenida Fernando, stated he lives directly across from the conference center at the Hotel. They have lived here for 20 years and strongly object to the water park. It is inconceivable that there are no significant impacts. The notion that the users of the pool will be limited to only guests of the hotel and membership is not true. They have heard that the Estates at Point Happy are also offering memberships with access to the Hotel amenities. There may be other developments who also are offering memberships as well. Who is going to enforce the users of the pool? It is an illusion that there will be a controlled access. He urges the Commission to vote against this project. 21. Mr. John Lissberger, 77-385 Loma Vista in the Mountain Estates, stated he has lived here for 20 years and has been disappointed with the City. The people who live here are abused. This historic Hotel is slowly being eroded and encroached upon. They were promised that the Mountain Course would stay a private course. Since KSL bought 01001 g Hotel, now the course is not private. Avenida Fernando is a 91 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 private road and multiple uses such as trucks have been using it. He would respectively ask that it be declined. 22. Ms. Mary Jane O'Connor, 77-343 Avenida Fernando, stated the hotel uses this area for most of their parties, weddings, bands. She has called the Hotel to complain on numerous times about the noise and has received no response. The pool is to have limited access with the gates locked and she knows there are numerous people that have been in there from outside the area. The parking spaces are taken by vendors and parking is not enforced. They state they will be planting trees on top of the mountain that will block their views. She has a great concern about the traffic that will be generated by the project. 23. Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Via Sierra, president of Mountain Estates HOA, stated that from where lives at the tennis villas she could stand on her deck and dive into the lazy river. Her concern is the number of trucks lined up to make their deliveries at 7:00 a.m. What about all the other condo projects that bought membership into the Hotel Club. How will they all get to the pool? How are they going to get to their homes with all this additional traffic? They already fight the traffic just to get home. 24. Mr. Rick Bylsk, 76-980 Avenida Fernando, President of the Los Estadoes HOA, stated he recognizes the benefits and successes of the Hotel. Their properties are tied very closely to the success of the Hotel because of the amenities offered. They were concerned when they learned about the signature pool, as there isn't even a definition of a signature pool. This is a water park or a morphing of the Hotel's quiet ambiance. Looking at the pool area with over 200 lounge chairs that will be increased to 700 is a strong impact. He would strongly encourage the Commission to deny this project. 25. James Carley, 77-303 Mazatlan, stated he has been a homeowner for 15 years and is against the pool because of the impact of additional traffic and noise. He purchased his home for the tranquility. A 30-foot water slide is not below grade and not tranquil. 26. Jeff Nagelberg, 49-045 Calle Flora, stated his concern about the timeline of the project. They will not be able to complq{ ti this project in ten months. People in Santa Rosa Cove ha �ettJJ l7 9 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 already had water table issues. If this percolation system is faulty in any way it will cause remarkable damage. Will he be forced to listen to a movie when he sits out at his pool. Living in the Cove you know how noise will rebound off the mountains. The idea that this project will not impede on them, is ridiculous. He urges the Commission to at least delay the project and ask CNL to move the project further back onto their own property. 27. Mr. Bram White, 77-631 Los Arboles, stated he too is concerned with property values, safety, security, traffic and noise. Hearing this project characterized as a water park, he has taken his children to Raging Waters and he would not want that located here. This is not a water park and will not be open to the general public. If it were he would be strongly opposed. In terms of traffic, if it is open only to the Hotel guests and members, the Hotel is limited number of rooms and can only sell that number of rooms. He does not see all the noise concerns that are being expressed. He hears kids making noise in the pools in his neighborhood and they will make noise wherever they are. Construction is taking place all over the City as well as at the Hotel and it does go away. He would ask everyone to view this in the big picture that the concerns are a little overblown. 28. Mr. Bill Bresnaham, 78-420 Calle Felipe, stated he is a member of the Club. He has found that the Hotel has been very reluctant to enforce their rules at the pools and tennis courts. They will need to change their system if they are going to improve this. How will they be forced to live up to what they state they are going to do? Will the City's Code Enforcement Department take care of the parking problems along Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando. 29. Mr. Tom Laverty, 48-805 Via Linda in the Mountain Estates. He has two issues. In the June 28`h presentation they were told that the competition for this type of amusement park ranged from 2 to 2.5 acres. This is proposed on 4.7 acres. They want to work with the Hotel, but they need to work together. They have asked them to speak to their HOA. If all 3,000 of the people who live in the area would go to dinner one time a year at the Hotel it would cover the 15,000 covers they will get from the Hotel guests. Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 30. Mr. Jay Green, Mountain Estates, stated the notice says the applicant is CNL and questions and answers have been addressed to CNL. If he understands it correctly, CNL has sold the Hotel to Morgan Stanley, and CNL will be gone. Who is the applicant when CNL is leaving town? Is a corporate interest going to trump the interests of the 200 odd residents who are here tonight? 31. Mr. Paul Keye, 49-991 Mazatlan, stated he is impressed with the Hotel and is concerned with what they will bring in next. He is surprised that this development would not require any additional reports. The Tennis Tournaments were previously held at the Hotel. What drove the migration of the Tennis Tournament championships to Indian Wells? Would you buy a home next to a signature pool. He hopes he did not. 32. Mr. Steve Davis, 77-500 Avenida Fernando, stated the Resort does not own Avenida Fernando and it is not a public road. He and Mr. Puget own a portion of the road. Their portion goes to approximately to the middle of the road. The road is about 24- 25 feet wide. He displayed pictures of trucks that travel. down Avenida Fernando and the problems that are incurred because of this traffic. The truck in the picture is 70 feet long. They deal with approximately 20-30 of these trucks a day. The truck is stopped because it hit his wall and got stuck in the driveway. The truck actually hit his wall twice trying to deliver to the hotel. He informed the City that he is currently in litigation that the Resort owners have overburdened their easement rights on this road and they are asking for extinguishment of the easement. The City may want to consider that if they grant rights to this project, there is an act of litigation that is asking for extinguishment of their right of the road. He was never asked if they had any objection to use of the road. Staff referenced an EIR that was done in 1975. There were seven other means of access into the Resort at that time. If there are 6,000 cars a day going down Avenida Fernando is that still an adequate EIR. 33. Mr. Thomas Harms 79-605 Cetrino, stated one of the reasons we have zoning, planning and environmental assessments is to ensure there consistency in compatibility between housing. What was true in 1975 is that staff was talking about what the environmental concerns were and that is not necessarilyIMI 0(j today. This land has been extensively developed and as part of 11 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 that development those same issues were addressed and satisfied. What is being asked at this meeting is a request to change that judgement that was made. In his opinion there are two questions that are appropriate to be raised. One is whether or not it is good for the applicant to make money if that is a change in the decision of the City at that time. Rather the question is, is the change being requested material. Here there is a proposal to change the density of use substantially; a proposal to change the noise significantly; and a proposal to change the lighting. Are those changes adverse to the existing property owners who were in the prior environmental assessment promised one thing. The response would be that the change will be adverse and because there is a material adverse change, he does not believe that the finding that there is no adverse change is appropriate and this application should be denied. 34. Mr. Ron Olson, 77-905 Laredo Court, stated he is opposed to the water park for three reasons: traffic, the parking situation, and noise on Obregon. He is a member of Tennis and Fitness Club at Resort and has found it is very tough to find a parking space. He therefore has resorted to different ways to travel to the Resort. Avenida Obregon is so narrow that two cars can hardly pass each other. Walking is another means of getting there, but you find that two cars cannot pass. The original EIR did not consider the size of the vehicles that are now being driven. The golf cart is another option to travel to the site but there have been instances when they too have almost been hit by a CVWD truck. What provisions have been made for golf carts and bicycles to travel to the Resort as well as park at the Resort? Noise is another issue as he can hear the band that plays every afternoon at his house which is % of a mile away. What happens if the water park fails? What will happen to this "white elephant? Also, will it be open to the public? 35. Mr. Scott Holmes, 77-490 Calle Cadiz, stated he owns two lots in the Enclave and Mountain Estates and asked that the application be denied and we all go home. His concern is that the extra traffic at the turn around area is going to cause the residents to the Mountain Estates to wait to enter their gate to get home. If the purpose is to increase occupancy during the summer, then why be open at Thanksgiving and Christmas? It is one thing to say noise levels meet standards and to live next door to it. How many of the Commissioners have been to Scood20' 12 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 City and how many would like to live next door to this? 36. Mr. Ed Mittelbusher, 77-333 Calle Mazatlan, asked if the Hotel feels that noise and light are not an issue, why not move it closer to Rinker Pool where it would only affect or not affect their guests? Why put it in the middle of a residential area. Yesterday there were at least six Morgan Stanley executives touring the facilities and there are none here at this meeting. Do they not want to hear what the people want to say? With the removal of the tennis courts they asked if they would be receiving a reduction in their tennis dues. They were told no, they would be raised. 37. Mr. Hayes O'brien, 48-840 Eisenhower Drive, stated he is member of the Club and is a real estate developer in Minnesota. He understand the right of a developer to develop their property, but he is concerned that this use of their property is tempered by the rights of surrounding property owners. The rights of the adjoining property owners are being trampled by the adjoining property owners. This is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong time. Please deny project. 38. Mr. Richard Fredericks, 49-875 Avenida Obregon, stated this is a safety disaster on the City's hands. He then gave pictures he had taken that were examples of the situation that currently exists along Avenida Obregon. Avenida Obregon is essentially blocked with bumper to bumper cars. Someone is going to get killed. This is the most ill advised proposal. The Resort does not keep its word. Tentative Tract Map 28545 showed that Avenida Obregon was to remain open and it was cut in half without public hearings. The parking on the tract map was reconfigured on Vista Flores from parallel parking to back out parking. There is no parking lot that meets the Zoning Code. Either the City cannot or will not enforce it. This water park will be bringing hundred or people to an area with no sidewalks. He is an abutting property owner and has an easement and his easement was cut in half from 40 feet to 20 feet without a public hearing or asking him his rights. The Resort does not police itself. You would think several citations would have been issued and yet only five citations were issued. Emergency vehicles could never get through. The Police say it is private property, but a fire lane is a fire lane and should be patrolled. He submitted the Property Rights provision of TT 28545 t� were not adhered to by the Resort. He then submitted 0 20 4 13 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 Council Minutes into the record. Avenida Obregon is a collector street and is to be 40 feet wide. When you do not comply with the Zoning Code you will have a disaster. 39. Mr. Joseph A. Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, stated he agrees with Kay Wolff in regard to the berm on Eisenhower Drive that has not been maintained for 20 years. The Resort has not been a good neighbor no matter who has owned it. He would urge that a condition be added to this project to require the Resort to fix and maintain the berm along Eisenhower Drive. 40. Ms. Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Via Sierra, questioned the season CNL says the park will be used. What do they determine to be the "season"? It is not just a summer time, it will be more than just the summer months. People use their pools in the shoulder seasons as well. 41. Mr. Phil Motts, Santa Rosa Cove, stated there are 2500 members to this cove and everything stated here should be multiplied by that number. 42. Mr. Jay Vaden 77-471 Loma Vista, stated he is concerned about Avenida Fernando because there are no sidewalk and very poor access. The triangle section crossing Avenida Obregon needs to be improved. He almost hit a lady walking in this area. There is also a new project that is being process across from the Tennis Villas. This is a matter of promotional sales. He loves the Hotel but does not like the way it has been run. 43. Ms. Leslie Fredericks, 49-875 Avenida Obregon, stated the La Quinta Hotel does not own all the area on Avenida Obregon. If she heard correctly, they are proposing another new gate on Avenida Obregon and she would like to know if this is true. Chairman Quill stated there will be no gate unless there is an issue and if that issue cannot be resolved by first placing a guard at this location. Ms. Fredericks stated she is a single- family two acre residents trapped in tourist commercial. If this gate is built, she is cemented her future as being a part of the La Quinta Hotel. 44. Mr. John Duggen 48-770 Via Linda, stated Mr. McCormick has stated the access to, and use of, this water park will �l0p restricted to guests of the hotel. He would like to have a c ` 14 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 definition of what a hotel guest is. He is particularly concerned that guest passes will not be given on a day basis. Will the guests be defined as being occupants of the Hotel? Chairman Quill stated that is the understanding before the Commission. 45. Mr. Ted Newell 77-160 Avenida Fernando, stated the 2500 members that do not use the facility all that often. The parking studies overlook the significance of the members who do not use the membership. If they put a water park in, he would be taking his grandchildren to the park which is another impact on the traffic. If you look at all those who will now be using the pool, there is the traffic increase. 46. Mr. Paul McCormick, La Quinta Resorts, stated this has been a resort for eight years. All the residents know the Resort is there. Public notifications were addressed to everyone within five hundred feet. Construction inconveniences are considered by themselves in regard to their guests. They believe they can keep the charm of La Quinta with these changes. It will not degrade the community. The noise study has been extensively studied. The issues with the berm on Eisenhower Drive that was referred to will be addressed. Their director has met with the City and they have received quotes to fix the area adding vegetation and decomposed granite. There is a potential acquisition of the Hotel; however, he is an employee of Hilton and not CNL and Hilton will continue to market the Hotel. The Hotel has many more resources to solve problems that CNL did not. In regard to property values, construction will have an affect. The elements they are constructing in the signature pool will enhance their guests stay. It does not have all the water park amenities and therefore is not a water park. Members and children will be allowed to use the pool if they are living at home and are under 23 years of age. In regard to police calls, there are more calls made in the neighborhoods by volume than at the Hotel. Every time they have received a call they do respond with a security follow-up. They have added additional security to address these problems. They try to be a good neighbor. In regard to lighting and landscaping issues, it will be low level lighting as compared to the tennis light that now exists. 47. Mr. Richard Zeilinga, Legal Counsel for La Quinta Resort, stated that with the threat of litigation it is important to make t " 0 2 0 8 record clear on some issues. With respect to the context it is 15 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 important to note that there is a Resort, a commercial operation, that is on -going and has been on -going for 70 years and mixed in are residences that are a more recent vintage. This is a conflict and is very common where this is this type of mix. Why isn't there pro -active planning to deal with this issue? In this particular case, there was. He displayed portions of an Agreement that was for the residents at 49-454 Avenida Obregon. This Agreement talks about in great detail that the Hotel has the right to install any trees, landscaping or construct any improvements at any location within Tennis property which could be in near proximity to any lot within the project including the property. It also acknowledges that the buyer agrees that the seller makes no warranties, representations that the Tennis Club properties will be maintained and operated in the manner that existed or was contemplated at the time of purchase. It also states the buyer for himself, herself, or related parties hereby acknowledges the potential for nuisances created by or arising by the Hotel property including without limitation odors, noises, traffic, congestions and other nuisances arising from other operations, landscaping and maintenance of the Hotel property, early and late night events, etc., etc. The buyer assumes the risk of any creation of maintenance or trespass or nuisance created by or arising in connection with Hotel activities or any matters described above. This Agreement was signed by the buyer. This is a standard form agreement used for the purchase of new property. He cannot represent that when properties are resold that every buyer shared with subsequent buyers that they had executed this type of agreement. It does show the planning and pro -thought that went into dealing with the issues raised tonight. They contend based on the studies they prepared, there isn't a problem when you compare what was originally approved in the EIR on the project in 1975 and all the updates with the increases in units and the changes that have occurred since then. There have been five updates and the City has been involved in all the environmental updates since then. In regard to the noticing, not only did the City notice the area within 500 feet they are required to, it was sent out to the entire boundary of the Resort property. This is above and beyond what is required. In regard to noise, there were three areas that were studied. The study is overly conservative because when the study was completed, all of those factors and changes made in regard to the concerns raised by the neighbors, are not assumed in the study. The 'study did not assume that all these slides would be closed dy yf 16 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 open, or that the mass had been split and brought down. The study did not consider the lazy river was lowered to reduce the noise impact. On traffic as there are no Hotel room increases, they did not believe hard quantitative counts were necessary, but they did it anyway and on parking and capacity, there is excessive capacity. He presented a photo taking of the parking area at 100% occupancy at 5:00 p.m. which showed no excessive parking. In regard to the Morgan House issue, the existing context is not a pristine context. The Morgan House is totally screened with an eight foot wall, and hedge. In regard to views they are not a significant impact by law. Finally, the City did not prepare a Negative Declaration, it prepared an Addendum to an EIR. This is an update to an existing EIR. 48. There being no further public comment Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. 49. Commissioner Alderson applauded Mr. McCormick's effort to take care of the landscape issues on Avenida Obregon. He recognizes not everyone is going to be happy. He had reviewed over 600 letters in regard to this project and a lot of consideration has been given to this project. The concerns raised are important and legal ramifications are important. He stands by staff and legal counsel in that the City is within its rights to review and act on this application, but he believes we are putting in jeopardy this grand Hotel of La Quinta. The business plan says it is a financially viable plan. If this were not successful the fall back is dire and it would cost the owners millions. It is an exchange of recreational uses. Taking it all into consideration, is it good for La Quinta? At this point he is not sure he could support the project. 50. Commissioner Barrows stated she would consider continuing the application. In looking at the conditions they relate to the physical aspect of the project. She asked if the park would be used from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Staff clarified that was the time the applicant stated the park would be open. Commissioner Barrows asked if there was a more minimal use discussed with the applicant as this appears to be the high end of the use. Staff stated discussions were not held on alternatives. Commissioner Barrows stated she too has seen the transition of the Hotel, and she would like to see �Q�® alternatives to the current design. V U v 17 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 51. Commissioner Engle stated he too believes this issue needs to be resolved at this meeting. Everyone is opposed to change, but he supports this project. People are coming and putting their money back into the community. The issue of the landscaping maintenance along Eisenhower Drive, however needs to be resolved and strong code enforcement needs to be in place to see that it does not happen again. He believes it is a good project. 52. Chairman Quill stated he appreciates everyone who came out to voice their opinion. He too has been a resident for a long time and has seen the transition of this Hotel. However, he believes not only does the Hotel have the right to change, but it has the obligation to do so. It is important to allow it to grow. If it fails, they have the right to tear it down and try something different; and this is their right. The development of the City and the golf communities around the Hotel were developed as a result of the Hotel. In regard to this, conditions need to be added to address security and over parking concerns. The berm along Eisenhower Drive needs to be addressed and a full landscape design submitted for approval. From an operation perspective Eisenhower Drive and the bike path should be addressed. A specific written operating plan for the parking lot and security should be added as a condition to be approved by the City. This will be a beautiful plan and the impacts will not be significant. 53. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-007 recommending certification of an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR No. 41), and subsequent CEQA compliance documents, for La Quinta Cove Golf Club revised Specific Plan 121-E (1975), as amended, prepared for Site Development Permit 2006-865, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. 54. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Chairman Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-008 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865, as recommended and amended: 000209 m Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 a. Condition added: A written operations plan related to the pool and Avenida Fernando for security for parking shall be submitted and approved by staff. b. Condition added: A landscaping plan for Eisenhower Drive and the bike path to the maintenance facility shall be submitted and approved by staff. C. Condition added: The landscaping on top of the rock mountains features shall be restricted to a height limit. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Engle and Chairman Quill. NOES: Commissioners Alderson and Barrows. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. The motion failed. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the policy of the City is that in a tie vote, the application is automatically a continuance. The missing member would be required to listen to a recording of the meeting and review all the material prepared and submitted. The options before the Commission are to continue the matter and allow the missing member to vote, or send the application to the City Council with the vote as taken. Discussion followed regarding the options before the Commission. 55. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Engle to adopt Minute Motion 2007-move the application forward to the Council with the vote as taken and with the added conditions. Unanimously approved. Chairman Quill recessed the meeting at 11 :04 p.m. and reconvened at 11:09 p.m. B. Site Development Permit 2006-874; a request of Komar Investments, L.L.C. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for seven commercial buildings, for the property located south of Highway 1 1 1 at Depot Drive. 1. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Les Johnson presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 00021 0 19 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked why the retention basins are not on the site plan. Staff stated they were temporary during the construction of the Costco building. They will go away. Commissioner Alderson stated Building "A" has a 33 foot high architectural element. Is this a legal elevation because it is set back 150 feet? Staff stated the height is consistent with the Specific Plan. 3. Commissioner Engle asked if the applicant was in agreement with all the conditions. Staff stated the applicant would respond to that condition. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Clint Knox, representing the applicant, stated they were available for questions. 5. Chairman Quill asked if there was a potential for an access that would cross over the Evacuation Channel. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated her recollection was that we required an access on the easterly edge at a point to be determined in the future if it was feasible to get to Jefferson Street. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated it was not added to the Specific Plan. 6. Commissioner Barrows asked how the particular feature on Building "B" would provide shade. Mr. Knox stated it is an architectural element, but it would provide shade. 7. Chairman Quill asked if shading was provided on the plans. Staff noted the west elevations have 12-15 foot trellis covers; the east elevations have less. S. Mr. Knox stated they are requesting a change to three conditions in regard to the Costco driveway which the Public Works Department has agreed to. Staff stated that was correct. 9. Commissioner Alderson asked if the median allows someone to exit Parcel 4 and go left. Mr. Knox explained you can make a left turn, but it is not a dedicated left turn. It is a right in/right out. The median will be modified. 000211 20 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 10. There being no further questions of staff and no other public comment, Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Engle/Barrows to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-009 approving Site Development Permit 2006- 874, as recommended and amended: a. Condition 81. A linear hedge with low maintenance plants shall be installed. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. C. Sign Application 2006-1078; a request of Imperial Sign Company, Inc. for consideration of a proposed sign program for permanent business identification signage and monument sign for Dunes Plaza, located at 79-640/700 Highway 111. 1 . Commissioner Engle noted he had a potential conflict of interest and left the dais. 2. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Assistant Planner Yvonne Franco presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked what staff objected to on the morument sign. Staff explained the applicant did not provide enough detail and the end elevation did not indicate the width. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated it is just an image that does not give any detail. The Center is very detailed and the monument sign is very simple. Staff is recommending it be redesigned and approved by staff. 4. There being no further questions of staff, the applicant not being present, and no other public comment, Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. OWM 21 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Alderson/Barrow to adopt Minute Motion 2007-003 approving Sign Application 2006-1078, as recommended. Unanimously adopted. Commissioner Engle rejoined the Commission. VI. BUSINESS ITEM: A. Continued - Notice of Public Nuisance Case No. 2006-5204; a request of Jeffrey S. and Ardis L. Manning for an appeal of a Public Nuisance regarding the violation of a recreational vehicle encroaching on the City right-of-way without a permit, parking in a location not zoned for vehicular parking, being improperly stored on a residential property, and a patio cover that violates the exterior side yard setback for the property located at 52-715 Avenida Navarro. 1. Chairman Quill asked for the staff report. Senior Code Compliance Officer Anthony Moreno presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked if the appellant had a permit for the spa cover. Staff stated none was ever obtained and the appellant stated the cover was there when they bought the house. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the appellants would like to address the Commission. Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Manning, 52-715 Avenida Navarro, stated the patio cover had been removed and was no longer an issue. In regard to the RV, he believes he meets the Municipal Code in regard to the Code requirements. 4. Chairman Quill asked staff for clarification on what was read from the Code by the appellant. Planning Manager Les Johnson stated the location of the RV is not immediately adjacent to or parallel to the driveway as required by the Code. 5. Ms. Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, stated she thought the RV needed some kind of shading. What offended her was that it was in complete view of the public. 000,213 22 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 6. Mr. Joe Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, stated he dislikes seeing the RV, and reported it to the City. It does not comply with the intent of the City's Ordinance. RVs need to be screened to not be in view of the street. 7. Ms. Ardis Maning, stated the Code does not require the RV to be screened or behind a wall. They offered to plant additional trees and were told by Code Compliance it was not necessary. 8. Commissioner Engle asked if this was within what the Code allows. Staff stated it is within inches. Mr. Maning stated when he parks the vehicle it can be within the one inch and yet another time he may be 1.5 inches over. 9. Commissioner Alderson stated the point is that it is unattractive and asked the definition of a "driveway". City Attorney Kathy Jenson read the definition of a driveway. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to adopt Minute Motion 2007-004 upholding the determination of Public Nuisance Case No. 2006-52. Unanimously approved. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Report on the City Council meeting of February 6, 2007. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Barrows to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on February 27, 2007. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 12:09 a.m. on February 13, 2007. Respectfully submitted, C*oa `� V--, er, Executive Secretary nta, California 000214 23 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 27, 2007 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Quill who asked Commissioner Barrows to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Ed Alderson, Katie Barrows, Jim Engle and Chairman Paul Quill. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to excuse Commissioner Daniels. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Les Johnson, Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen, Assistant Planner Jay Wuu, and Secretary Carolyn Walker II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: Chairman Quill asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of February 13, 2007. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Sign Application 2003-720, Amendment No. 1; Consideration of an Amendment to an existing Sign Program allowing the placement of special event banners. 1. Chairman Quill opened the Public Hearing. Assistant Planner Jay Wuu presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked if the sign exhibits were computer generated. Staff said yes. GAMDOMPC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 3. Commissioner Engle asked about the proportions of the sign. Ms. Leslie Locken, Property Manager of Old Town La Quinta, 78-150 Main Street, La Quinta, stated there was a discrepancy in the measurements used and they have been corrected. She showed an example of a five by 18-foot banner, and a 30-foot long banner. Copies were given to the Commission. Ms. Locken said she had two issues. The first issue was the size of the lettering on the five by 18-foot banner which was 1 1-inches high and not easily readable as well as limited in how much verbiage could be accommodated. She requested a five by 30-foot banner as it would be more proportionate. She stated the banners at Desert Club Drive and Calle Tampico would be double -sided and a five by 18-foot banner could not be easily read. The banners have been more effective than media advertising in attracting customers to Old Town. The second issue was whether the banners could remain for three weeks prior to their Grand Opening event in late March. 4. Commissioner Alderson asked if the banner, which was noted as 20-feet off the street was at a safe height. Ms. Locken replied truck height was 16-feet and the 20-foot height should be safe. 5. Commissioner Engle said he was in favor of the special event banners, as long as there was no clutter. He agreed five feet by 18-feet was too small. He said the five by 30-foot would be better as long as it was not offensive and in good taste. He had hesitations about the three week time period and thought one week should be enough. He agreed with the Conditions of Approval as stated by staff for the time period. 6. Commissioner Alderson asked if a compromise of two weeks would be acceptable. Staff said they recognized this was Phase II and a new addition to Old Town and understood the need for special signage for the Grand Opening event. 7. Commissioner Alderson asked about measuring from curb to curb as opposed to street width. Staff clarified the distinction. 8. Commissioner Alderson asked about the difference between the original size requested versus what staff was recommending. Staff clarified the difference. i�0d14 G\WPDOCS\PC Minutesk2007\2-27-07.doc 2 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 9. Chairman Quill said he did not have a problem with the five by 30- foot banner or the three week time period. He said he wanted to do anything necessary to help Old Town be successful. He said the signs were large, but if done properly and maintained they would be acceptable. The City needs to do all it can to help the vendors. 10. Commissioner Barrows concurred and stated it was an opportunity to help the vendors. 11. Chairman Quill asked about the tree signs. Ms. Locken said she was working with staff to use a kiosk or alternate display method instead of the tree signs. 12. Chairman Quill asked if there was any other public comment. There being none, Chairman Quill closed the Public Hearing. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to adopt Minute Motion 2007- 006 recommending approval of Sign Application 2003-720, Amendment No.11, as recommended and amended: A. The total square footage for each of the banners that span across Main Street shall be no greater than 150 square feet (30-feet x 5-five). The applicant shall install the approved banners a� the approved locations. B. The e\ three i an apr and re the ev for as event. C. The use shall be D. Letters sh (top/bottoi 18 inches -pecific banners shall be erected no sooner than s (21 days) prior to the event (which shall have d Temporary Use Permit or Village Use Permit), ed no later than two days after the conclusion of Each special event sign/banner shall be applied : of the TUP/VUP application for the subject the special event banners in Old Town La Quinta cited to 180 days per calendar year. not be closer than six inches to the edge -ides) of banners. Maximum letter size shall be height. DWI17 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. B. Environmental Assessment 2006-575 and Zone Change 2006-129• Consideration to certify a Negative Declaration and a zone change from RM/17/1 Medium Density Residential, 17 foot height, single story to RM(2O/5/10)17/1 in order to reduce the existing 15 foot rear yard setback to ten feet. Located south of Avenida La Fonda, north of Avenida Nuestra, west of Washington Street, and east of Calle Guatemala. 1. Chairman Quill opened the Public Hearing. Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the staff report which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Mark Green, 51-420 Calle Jacumba, spoke in favor of changing the setback and said this change would provide more opportunities for better home design on these lots. 3. Chairman Quill asked if anyone else wanted to speak on this project, there being none, the public hearing was closed. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-009 recommending to the City Council certification of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2006-575 as submitted. ROLL CALL:AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. 5. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-010 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2006- 129 as submitted. ROLL CALL:AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: None G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc 000218 El Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: Commissioners discussed the upcoming Planning Commissioner Conference. Commissioners Engle, Alderson and Chairman Quill stated they would be attending. Commissioner Barrows was unsure at this time. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Engel to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on March 13, 2007. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 7:36 p.m. on February 27, 2007. Respectfully submitted, Carolyn Wa er, Secretary City of La Quinta, California 0O0 i19 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-27-07.doc 5 Department Report: i— C OF •Tttti' TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager�� DATE: March 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Department Report - Response to Public Comment The following public comment was made at the March 6, 2007 City Council meeting: 1. Nadia Villagran, 78-770 Sunbrook Lane, presented The Lalo Guerrero Arts Festival program and requested funding from the City for La Quinta High School student scholarships. The Mayor thanked Ms. Villagan for her presentation and asked that she contact Edie Hylton, Community Services Director to request a grant application packet. t 000220 DEPARTMENT REPORT: p t w � . Y sa "sa'CITY COUNCIUS `48UPCOMING EVENTS MARCH 20 GTI-:1Ik] APRIL 17 APRIL 28 MAY 1 MAY 15 !P1NAIW JUNE 19 JULY 3 JULY 17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING 25TM ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING r. 0002)21 LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MONTHLY CALENDAR March 2007 y I Monday —iu Tuesda'y'� Wednesday 6da Thursday Friday� isaturday 2 3 14,� IN 12:00 PM Mayors Lunch 9:00 AM 4:00 PM SJSR February April hid. Mnint-Handerson S M T W T F S S M T W T F S -- 1 —1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 5 6 7 8 10 8 9 1011 12 13 14 11 12 13 14 15 1fi 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 28 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 39 T i:1",y I 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3:00 PM City Council 10:00 AM ALRC 9:30 AM Animal Campus - Meeting Henderson 11:09 AM CVCC-Sniff 12:00 PM Energyl Environs Sniff 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1000AMPub. Sfty-Kirk 7:OOPMPlanning 9:00 AM RCTC. 3:00 PM Historic Preser. 9:00 AM CVA-Henderson 12�00 PM Transp-Kirk Commission Henderson vation Commission 3:00 PM Mtns. 5:30 PM Investment Daylight Savings Time Consversancy-Kirk Advisory Board Begins 5:30 PM Centennially Services Commission 6:00 FM League. Henderson F- La Dmrita Arts Festival 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 3:00 PM City Council 10:30 AM Homelessness 9:00 AM LAFCO Meeting Code. Henderson 12:00 PM HurnionlCom Osbome La Ouinta Arts Festival 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10:30 AM RCTC Budget - 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM Sunline-Adolph Henderson Comnossion 4:00 PM J.Cochran Reg. 6:00 PM Exec Cane.. Arro-Osborne Adolph ... .. ... .. Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 3/14/2007 V V V 4 4 G LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MONTHLY CALENDAR April 2007 .. . .. 3 Wednesday 4 ..Saturday 5 6 7 2 3:00 PM City Council 10:00 AM ALBC Meeting 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 10:00 AM Pub. Sfty Kirk 7:00 PM Planning 9:00 AM BCTC- 11:00 AM CVCGSniff 12:00 PM Transp-Kirk Comrrdssion Henderson 12:00 PM Energy[ 6:00 PM League 5:30 PM Investment Environs Sniff Easter Henderson Advisory Board 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 7:00 PM Community 3:00 PM City Council 10:30 AM Namelessness 3:00 PM Historic Preser. 9:00 AM CVA-Henderson Services Commission Meeting Cone. vation Commussion 12:00 PM HumanlCamm Osborne 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10:30 AM BCTC Budget' 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM Sunline-Adolph 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson Commission Henderson City 25th Anniversary Picnic Celebration .F,Yx •{IIiI VY ctt�.,+i,.FeF{Iny,411'116ii.5 piY°ai Ye 15 . Erf;;;1i,�.'I;:iiI:IIF f�1'I'f •"iAJ A fix'; j•§ Y, ',I�a <a�. i§�. 'il"N ';';! •:F," 29 30 if)§ti.� x h3,.' [ p.., .+24it x:'¢'n Ni 5Y.1i N€1.�i{'}nrli. irY'NYi.� S �Nk^f. Y �i �; rl. $qtry:;• �'s: I..t1f e: y,f'F ii F'; ;;'�„�.��,�� , ' 2 § 3 '•; 1'!'s.•'sYrsda'r id:iPfi<< 6:00 PM Exec Cmte:•'•;, y,x „1{s,�+rfir,n F^I}2Y 9,x+rt''''''a March ^?sfi€4 s''' y: Adolph`n''Y`':€;'x�'!`,'�%f S M T W T F S,,+i,; S M T W T F S •"'1'i''ir113r4fF:,.'s; 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 :^xtx''§•s''�',•Yr,n. 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 r,.lr¢§"§Y=�Fe7'¢'gtgg:A ,it+ B 7 B 9 10 11 12 o'<+', 12 13 14 15 16 17'fixk'y:iy y §'I''1'"• 13 14 15 IB 17 to 19 •::', 25 28 5,�';'�'Ji3'• y"yy'd{z ogy',f, 3, +tfiPa•:fi�'F 25 26 207 2a 29 30 3� :@n�ti;Y�;+'filly gig,, �,s 27 2a 29 30 31 ,If,'}1+; :.Y, §;{F,xi', 'J}:I 'J'%'§;�;i';�iJ 'Yry: rF;.?i •i k' 'p. l:1: ^ s^rtY €"'tfia ?'sq x; ,:.,1 na .§ 5H•t: [')�:;ld�'liaiiYlitl.:��nl:'' kx.r e:}+. }i .nk+•'' 'ixg %? '�yg ',�:, �"�� _£,'.:;� 5:§Y7•; ' 3Yera,''::r3, , f,£ a„,.k;�Y;"��5=,++ YY.i'''F€ ^ ."€se{, ?'Srt S.i +,. ,.x•:;S. �.F' .n} $ r"'§'£: eAl k?•+ks 3.,'I x: £..a=,18."fi;;,k :22 ; r-s,§ )`` ^.;a'.t 11'.YY ' Ni Y.M1''Yi:i4. ii4N+� il�ii Yv'k.i Y. Nti' iJif"+<5+'I+: •F�..F 4§;f'�yn :.fi e lY:i%ye€Ij t•1''x ,56:, Y:;§,€'',N"a''J, §.; �...g ;:, ;:.d..fi., 6'�.. i'r3•s+t;..,,'',; •j,,',';�j .rSi%:d ,n', t,„�n„5,it rt.irti' �`s=s•. Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 3/14/2007 0 0 0 .� LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MONTHLY CALENDAR May 2007 — da 1—itt day �on ay T�uesy� � Wednesy da Thursday da Friy� Saturday 2 3 4 3:00 PM City Council 10:00 AM ALIFIC 1: ayors unc: April meeting 0 Nfl. Mmint-Henderson I T • M T W F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 24 21 21 27 28 Happy Birthday La '' 29 30 auinte (actual 25th1 `0 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7:00 PM Planning 9:00 AM RCTC. 9:30 AM Animal Campus - Commission Henderson Henderson 5:30 PM Investment 11:00 AM CVCC-Sniff Advisory Board 12:00 PM Enerryl Environs Sniff -1 13 14 15 -- 16 17 18 9 10:OOAMPub. Sfty-Kirk 3:00PM City Council 10:30AMHomelessness 3:00PM Historic Preser. 9:00AMCVA-Henderson 12:00 PM Transp-Kirk Meeting Cinte. vation Commission Mother's Day 3:00 PM Mtns. 12:00 PM HumaniCom Consversancy-Kirk Osborne 5:30 PM Community Services Conviression 6:00 PM League Henderson 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM Sunline-Adolph 9:00 AM LAFCO. Commission 4:00 PM J.Cochram Reg. Henderson Aiirp-Osborne 27 28 29 30 31 MM, June S M T W T F S Memorial Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i� (CITY HALL CLOSED) 0 11 12 13 14 15 16 P':� 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4 25 26 27 28 29 30 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 3/14/2007 o o o 7 2, 4 DEPARTMENT REPORT: TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety _rg DATE: March 20, 2007 RE: Department Report — February 2007 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and garage sale permits for the month of February. Also included are Monthly Executive Status Reports for Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes, the City Hall Expansion and the Museum Expansion. The statistical summaries depict the following highlights for the month of February: • Year-to-date building permit valuation is $15,748,259 which represents an issuance of 266 building permits; ■ Animal control handled 238 cases; • Code compliance initiated 403 cases; ■ Garage sale permits generated $1080 in income. r P.O. Box 1504 • LA QUINIA, CAIIFORNIA 92247-1504 78-495 CALLF TAMPICO • LA QUIVIA, CALIFORNIA 92253 7� (760) 777-7000 -FAX (760) 777-7101 �7 Building Permit Statistics - Summary CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING PERMIT STATISTICS 2007 2oo6 2005 Permits Issued SD Total Total Valuation (dollars) Permits issued Total Valuation (dollars) Permits Issued Total Valuation (dollars) Month SFb Total SFD I Total January '21 324 10,476,542 145 468 37,258,834 113 392 26,716,9o5 February 55 266 15,748,259 154 387 44,5o8,667 90 393 30,700,080 March - - - 38 454 38,210,764 231 696 49,942,562 April - - - 40 347 15,5o7,67o 81 443 25,677,361 May - - 34 517 28,79o,o96 77 472 21,071,875 June - - - 94 403 23,907,853 110 527 39,826,912 July - - - 18 262 io,893,i89 110 425 35,497,988 August - - - 59 287 18,200,W6 126 588 43,698,268 September - - - 27 313 10,792,818 76 489 37,852,849 October - - 34 303 8,482,965 86 491 22,907,261 November - - - 54 320 17,515,515 59 323 17,375,634 December - - 18 216 18,105,659 82 348 25,091,757 1376,359,452 Total 76 590 26,zzq,8o1 715 4,277 272,174,946 1,zg1 5,587 o�7 2 �noomoomomN0000NonoNo a 000.ioo.i o.i �n o�nmmmorv000 a i W i � W i .+r m W m.-� rNomommro mn in m mm .a non �nobmmn u� m N m wgWl a! 1 j1 N m N b O O O O O N O O O O O r m O m O C 'Fl i NNmb m Ob OOOOnNO'10 b , aQ i O V m 0 rl N b O N r N SP m N V O b0f ON N ?r1 N Nb'10r NNN b m I (y''� � O N N01 ry n NnlN rlr 111 ^'IN N O 1 M Q 1 .a �w F I m N N N O O W O N b O m N N N o o m a v O i mW� al i m � "IN Nmoomo.anom.abmo aNwN n a IQ� m ooroomrv000nna bo in m.+o .-I i m � .a inomoo.�Noobmoinmo.immo 0 ao � W � mo rin in m.+mm.+rvnN.1orvvmo b ' ti r V .i O ri 10 r1 n T ei O1 ri N CI b I+1 N FI N gg m ri 0 0 0 0 N N O m C O 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 m u �a q' i [j ''Ql I lON o y100'I t.IbONOON000 l V b O O W r V O N N a F W W s p a I a I M Q I e^ I I (1 O n l d N m a N I m m O 1l1 O 1 N m N N N N m N V I N r V l a w NO9IW F C1F w �� E � bm O mri rim VI N N N VI r Y T V 1(1?N N ry H aaEl�a� "wlaj� N .a. woow1 a NNNIQ H i aa Q iy W H z w w w WWg a og\w W it ow ti p azcwia ov �im��ooc�ua waF q of ^. aa w ,z Fwo...PwwloF Q o arvz P\u 0olmoo a oaw a 1 aso Qm QQo z y�r") F a uz EWww�(�S]F m waWW��oH i1a'rs pA W V W W W aKa0.' W N(ol1F U Q RmcoiU ii 3 Q O N pO co o O r 0 o O N O M O O O O N N N } U O O O 0 o ao 0 Z O Cal m o 0 0 0 N Q 0 0 0 0 C O O O O cc 0 0 0 0 0 NRO e}00 wMw 0 <o 0000r-O OC w v� t�OO {Cp M V N V O (O I� O ({ M Q �- O M O N M N N pNj O M N y o. d s cm c m c > E 4) E C N N a C w = U O is O C O O H= l6 O' a o V c E c A :3 c 9 °� a m To > t c c 1 > �a �¢ <cl 5 a o F- ~ U C d O Q o v O 'O y 'O C O d 'O C p E N O C .� y N O m of E y d >a10i3 �af0i3 0 0 �af0i3~ Q 0 O >a10i3F' Q O O °=22�oo��F' m Q U> N 0 0 o'o'c�� a Z Q J O p Q O Q 0228 4 r Ix 0 IL w J Q U H N H Q F- N W U Z Q J a 2 0 U w 0 0 t� n a a N 2 O O N O O M N O N W M N N N M CLOD f6 } � O O 0 0 00 Z 0 0 0 O 00 o 0 a � o 0 � o0 o0 �a 0 0 00 `p N N O O O n (A N N (O Cl) O 4 th N co c7 10) CO IC-41 LL N N w tC, F r� 10 CO O OD NOS O r N 0 y N ~ N O -o a 9 f/! U W -o MMdf/JM F F U) Z a oya°i Z �a� Z dd H a�iy °.2� N aaia3��?gf y W c� m C a) W r La- ar W _. C :°- al Q J C m- N y d 63. Z d K W LL' W Z O R� W K W FW Z �(nE �- o:°- > InE WNE F WEE I- OinE E o— O WmEaa_aa N1 o - FLU r ._ U U O U o U U Z U J rL m U o m Q m Q W C d U y m 7 a 2 iQ W a W N U W W O .B O F y A J W O Z U W Q V Q K a y a N W Z LU Z O 5 > y = a z 5 m m 00"?g Y (ONSTRUC lO j INC alendora BmerlyWNSs San{lemcrtte LaQuinta lasVegas Monthly Executive Status Report City of La Quintal Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes Presented to the City of La Quinta: March 7, 2007 For the Month of February, 2007 • No negative community related problems/issues reported. • Sewer construction started February 7, 2007 and is currently under construction. • Plans for site private fire suppression line have been approved by Riverside County Fire Department and CVWD. • Framing for Units 172. 173, 174, 175, 176, 178, 179 & 180 completed and design review in progress. • All site perimeter walls under construction. • Continued to resolve documentation errors with City, Architect and Engineers. Schedule Performance Project to Date • Original Completion Date: 9/5/07. • Current Completion Date: Unknown -new schedule will be available week of 3/ 12/07. • Days Ahead/Behind: Per Davis Reed schedule & D R site superintendent - Not on schedule: 12 weeks late. Budget Performance Project to Date I Total Awarded Contract Amount 21,400,000 Contingency 2,500,000 Total Available Budget (Contract Award plus Contingency) 23,900,000 Change Orders To Date (3): Credit -287,109 Contingency Used To Date: -287,109 Current Cost Commitments (original bid + change orders) 21,112,891 Un-committed Available Budget Remaining 2,787,109 Current Commitments as % of Total Available Budget 88% Safety Performance Project To Date No lost time or claims due to injuries or safety violations. • No on -site accidents to date. Upcoming Month's Priorities/Key Activities (March 2007) • Approve utility plans from Verizon & The Gas Company by March 15, 2007. • Continue to value engineer the building construction components. • Start Units # 166,167, 168, 169,170 and 171 the first week of March. 11 �0� of gt (ONSTRUICTION, IHC a Glendora BevedyWift SanClernente LaWnU Las Vegas Monthly Executive Status Report City of La Quinta Museum Expansion Presented to the City of La Quinta: March 7, 2007 For the Month of February, 2007 ae w • PWCI provided City wan constructon cost esurnaie vi .p�,cvv,wv • Bid process initiated • PWCI held a pre -con with prospective bidders PWCI logged and forwarded all incoming contractor's RFI's • Met on -site with all local utilities Schedule Performance Project to Date J Preliminary Schedule calls for (dates approximate): Publication for bid - 2/8/07 • Bid opening - 3/12/07 • Contract award - 3/20/07 e Notice to proceed - 4/3/07 • Contract completion - 2/15/08 • Closeout - 3/15/08 Budget Performance Project to Date Contract Amount Pro ected $2,200,000 Contingency $500,000 Total Available Budget Pro'ected Contract plus Contingency) 2,700,060 Change Orders To Date N/A Contingency Used To Date N/A Current Cost Commitments (original bid + change orders N/A Un-committed Available Budget Remaining N/A Current Commitments as % of Total Available Budget N/A safety Performance Project To Date N/A :oming Month's Prioritles/Key Activities (March, 2007) • PW Construction to continue coordination with architect and engineers • Allowances for security, listening impaired, and audio visual added • PWCI to notify bidders of the plan and spec availability and bid closing schedule • Plans and specs posted on OCB/PLANWELL web site • PWCI to promote site observation at existing museum • Bulletin # 1 to be posted 3/7/07 • Bid opening remains as scheduled on Monday, 3/12/07 ly 7 U I • Currently 8 general contractors on the bid list t, �f ;'- �MFWNSTRUUION, INC +"Glendora Boverty0s SanClemente LaQu�ma Monthly Executive Status Report City of La Quinta City Hail Expansion Presented to the City of La Quinta: March 7, 2007 For the Month of February, 2007 • Poured concrete for foundations/footings/stem walls • Commenced and completed interior hardware demolition of WA #1 & WA #2 • Change order for installation of approximately 200' of 4" conduit (future solar panels) • Change order to remove two existing Verizon phone booths • Completed all utility tie-ins • Completed 320' of 2" PVC to provide for emergency water tank • WA # 1 pump house relocated • Eliminated scope of work in WA #3 Schedule Performance Project to Date I • Ten working days delayed - (Design Issues) WA #6 sewer ejector pit area. We have been at a stalemate for 2 weeks awaiting design details from the architect and structural engineer who has stated this is not their scope. Budget Performance Project to Date Total Awarded Contract Amount 8,700,000 Contingency 1,500,000 Total Available Budget Contract Award plus Contingency) 10,200,000 Change Orders To Date 13 : 94,414 Contingency Used To Date: 94,414 Current Cost Commitments (original bid + change orders 8,794,414 Un-committed Available Budget Remaining 1,405,586 Current Commitments as % of Total Available Budget 86.217, Safety Performance Project to Date • No lost time or claims due to injuries or safety violations. • No on -site accidents to date. �pcoming Month's Priorities/Key Activities (March, 2007) • Resolve design issue on Sewer Ejector Pit (Complete pour) • Complete forms and pour (foundation/stem wall) southeast corner • Relocate personnel from WA #4 and commence demolition • Set forms and pour foundations in WA # 1 & WA #2 • Rough in: electrical, plumbing, HVAC and sprinklers (WA #1 & #2) Department Report: JT L��T am Q c&t!t 4 F c�,wp�S yOFTVV' TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Douglas R. Evans, Comr&nity Development Director DATE: March 20, 2007 P' SUBJECT: Department Report for the Month of February 2007 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Department Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of February. s- 000733 PAMonthly Report Folder\FEBRUARY 2007.doc 1 H z w 2 a w p H Z W a 0 J W W p } H z c) C 0 U H 0 NL w z w H a a w a n O O N } Nr a D ir in W w 0 z H 0 H v F a) d m a) tr p0. U <n E w w N p Y 0 o N V c o U W O N o 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Q �_ a) a) 0 o 0 o 0 x •.� E 1•+ ++ ++ ++ ++ Y ++ U 0 E E E E E E a E E a E E E E E E E w Z a) aaaaaa 7aa 7aaaaaa.0Z Q N a> 7 7 7 7 7 7 N 7 7 N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 J c N N N N N N ^ N N N N N N N N N Q a �0 0N0 O�—'—M��M000It SOLO z a Z 0 J N Q U H W � Wa y 0 N H �' Z ++ al N +' a� E a) E a) a E E N N N 0 N • E W V a: ai C N d a7 a N c a)'O NL ` N += a iL E Ni N Q a E a a) E a) a= a`) `m a c m a Q N U) m y m a N N O m a) v c m c aci E aci a s y `, E 6 a a)� N m o a, .o O y a > U> f`0 L U L N fZ 0 OEc a) U U> >'>c °° ' ° U7�LN 0w CiU) vc UH°0 <a>n 000,234 N n O O N ir ir Q in W LL O F O O N f0 M O) N � H Z O a ¢ E U Q U O W O O O` N N N N Y N N N N N LU Y Y Y Y C C Y Y Y Y_ Y Y_ Y Y_ Y Y_ W \ / E E E E -a -a E E E E E O -0 -0 .O -07 7 -0 -0 -0 -0 .0 � �. a N N co N N N N N N N N N a CO N M O M N Q Q W M O F _ Q �O O QLL W Z W W Q a N o C N Y Y U) E E U E E a� N -o LL Q 'a a�i a m Y OV m c E E t iLU d N a Q E U O Q N CL CW G f6 N l0 �i 0 N N Z) O Ea E> a N ° Z 0 O 0) U >DL J J +O 2d O Q U YC c_NNN C f H> N N .Y O N 0 0O O O 0cO_ 00irU)U)U) - NNQ HH V N O a a m c m a U U N a N v c C N N N N N N Q m c a� E O c W O N N Y U O N N O0Okqvl%5t cr) DEPARTMENT REPORT: 5-A 1 � l0j. ow H �FM of mow TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Douglas R. Evans, Cmunity Development Director DATE: March 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Discussion Regarding Sphere of Influence East of City Limits City Council Subcommittee Since the last report of February 6, 2006, the Subcommittee met on February 28 and March 14, 2007. Meeting topics primarily focused upon fiscal data and considerations for the SOI but also briefly included the Memorandum of Understanding for the SO] area as well as the strategic planning process. Fiscal Considerations City staff and RSG facilitated a meeting with key Sphere of Influence (SOI) stakeholders for the purposes of discussing final analysis, including fiscal model methodologies, assumptions, and various funding options. Participants included the Coalition, Outdoor Resorts, and the Enclave. Fiscal experts from each group attended. The firms of Stanley Hoffman and Associates, Jennifer Branin, and Community Development Associates attended. The meeting format followed a summary of three fiscal models (RSG, Hoffman and CDA) and the various assumptions included in each study. City staff and RSG will evaluate and provide a written response and update after careful evaluation of the information discussed during this three hour meeting. A full update will be provided at the Council meeting of April 3, 2007. A ** City staff has continued dialogue with Riverside county staff regarding the MOU. County Council's office continues to review the draft MOU. Staff will provide a more detailed update at the Council meeting of April 3. Redevelopment Agency City staff has received some additional information regarding the County's RDA Plan and is preparing an additional request for information. 000236 Task Force The Vista Santa Rosa Task Force last met on February 8, 2007. Task Force members provided written and verbal comments specific to the land use concept map. County staff continues to work on the proposed land use concept map, making final last minute policy adjustments based upon the feedback received from Task Force members. Two meetings have been scheduled since the February 8, 2007 meeting but have been cancelled. The next Task Force meeting is scheduled for March 22, 2007. County staff previously indicated that the land use concept map would be submitted to the Riverside County Planning Commission in April. Cancellation of the last two Task Force meetings may change this schedule. Additional information regarding the review schedule for the land use concept map will be provided at the March 22, 2007 Task Force meeting. Staff will provide a more detailed update at the Council meeting of April 3, 2007. South Valley Program Community Development and Public Works staff continues to attended meetings of the South Valley Implementation Program (SVIP) Committee. This committee is essentially comprised of Riverside County staff, consultants, developers and representatives from neighboring jurisdictions. The purpose of the SVIP Committee meetings has historically been to focus upon the transportation and land uses proposed for the South Valley area. The last meeting of the SVIP Committee was held on March 14 in Indio. The focus of the meeting was to continue to obtain and address comments on the various aspects of the SVIP. Staff comments were submitted on the traffic study component, and staff will be providing comments on the land use and design guideline components as well. The next SVIP Committee meeting will be held April 11, 2007, with the SVIP scheduled to be presented to the County Planning Commission at a workshop to be held on April 18, 2007, in the La Quinta City Council Chambers. Staff will be in attendance at both of these meetings. The Community Development Department recently provided written comments to Riverside County Staff and the County's traffic consultant addressing concerns with the SVIP. Though the majority of the written comments focused upon traffic, staff also included comments addressing CEQA, land use and providing proper notice for review and comment of this proposed development. A copy is attached. 0001,37 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 42 0j •c F OF TKF'O TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Edie Hylton, Community Services Directo DATE: March 20, 2007 �XX SUBJECT: Community Services Department Report for February 2007 UPCOMING EVENTS OF FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2007: April 2 *Mat Pilates April 2 *Ageless Action Aerobics April 2 *Hooked on Loops April 2 Tae Kwon Do, La Quinta High School April 2 Jazzercise, Senior Center April 3 *Free Tax Assistance April 3 *Introduction to the Computer April 3 *Quicken Banking Module (4 classes) April 4 *Beginning Tap Dance April 5 *Digital Photography April 6 *Yoga for Health April 7 Annual Egg Hunt, La Quinta Park April 9 Kickboxing Boot Camp, Senior Center April 9 Intermediate Computers, Senior Center April 10 *Introduction to Word Processing April 10 `Baby" Boomer Boot Camp April 10 *Beginning Watercolor April 10 *Jewelry Making April 11 Using Microsoft Excel, Senior Center April 11 *Sketching & Drawing April 12 *Mosaic Tile Art April 12 *Photo Editing 1 April 12 Beginning Ballet, La Quinta High School April 12 Dance, Play, & Pretend, La Quinta High School April 13 *Latin Dance April 14 Junior Tennis Tournament, Fritz Burns Park April 17 *Quicken Investment Module (2 classes) April 17 *Tai Chi Independent April 17 *Word Processing (Level 2) April 17 *Beginning Mah Jongg April 17 Intermediate Belly Dancing, La Quinta High School 000238 April 17 Hawaiian Hula/Tahitian Dance, La Quinta High School April 17 Pre-Teen/Teen Theater & Jazz, La Quinta High School April 18 *Beginning & Continuing Italian April 19 *Photo Editing 2 April 19 Beginning Belly Dancing, La Quinta High School April 20 Fishing Derby, Lake Cahuilla April 24 La Quinta: Legend in the Making book signing, La Quinta Library April 24 *Introduction to E-Mail April 24 *Files & Folders April 26 *Tai Chi for Health April 26 *Photo Editing 3 April 26 *Mature Driver Training April 26 *Introduction to the Internet April 27 * Multi -Generational Talent Show April 28 Annual Birthday Party & Community Picnic, Fritz Burns Park April 28 25`h Anniversary Concert & Fireworks, La Quinta High School April 30 Dance, Play, & Pretend, Senior Center April 30 25`" Anniversary Golf Tournament, Silverrock Golf Course *Daytime Senior Center class or activity �0'OT3p Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of February 2007 Summary Sheet Program 2007 2006 Variance Sessions Per Month 2007 2006 Leisure Classes 180 121 591 59 56 Special Events 200 312 -1121 1 4 Adult Sports 697 314 383 50 19 Senior Center 1548 1612 -64 115 126 Total 2,625 2,369 266 225 205 Senior Services Senior Center 356 329 27 19 21 Total 356 329 27 19 21 Sports User Groups La Quinta Park Use AYSO 200 400 -200 24 25 F C La Quinta 15 15 0 5 8 Sports Complex LQSYA 300 150 150 21 22 Facility/Park Rentals Library Multi -Purpose Room 900 500 400 6 2 Classroom 600 50 550 15 1 Senior Center (Private Part) 300 450 -150 2 3 (Church) 300 320 -20 4 4 Civic Center (Private Party) 100 0 100 2 0 Park Rentals La Quinta Park 250 160 90 5 4 Fritz Burns Park 200 150 50 1 1 Total 3,165 2,1951 970 --85F 70 Total Programs 6,146 4,883 1,263 329 296 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 1 5051 2211 284 Total Volunteer Hours 1 5051 2211 284 000940 Community Services Program Report for February 2007 2007 2006 2007 213136 Participants Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Kickboxing Boot Camp 17 0 17 7 0 Beginning Bellydance 13 16 -3 4 4 Intermediate Bell dance 8 7 1 4 3 Adobe Photoshop Pro 4 0 4 4 0 Adobe Photoshop Advanced 3 2 1 4 3 Adobe Photoshop Intermediate 11 5 6 4 2 Beg Computers 10 6 4 3 2 Microsoft Word 91 1 8 4 3 Beginning Guitar 221 0 22 2 0 Intermediate Guitar 81 1 7 1 1 Guitar - Blues 5 0 5 1 0 Tee Kwon Do 8 4 4 8 3 Beginning Ballet 15 9 6 4 2 Dance, Play & Pretend 34 12 22 6 2 Hiking in CV 8 0 8 1 0 How To Stop Unwanted Thoughts 5 0 5 2 0 Totals 180 63 117 59 25 2007 2006 2007 2006 Participants Participants Variance Meetin s Meetings Special Events Community Concert 200 1501 501 1 1 Totals 2001 1501 501 1 1 2007 2006 2007 2006 Participants I Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Adult Sports Open Gym Basketball 359 134 225 23 15 Fitness Center 158 0 158 23 0 Adult Soccer League 180 180 0 4 4 Totals 697 314 383 50 19 Recreation Totals 1,0771 5271 5501 110 1 45 000?41 Monthly Revenue Report for February 2007 Monthly Revenue - Facility Rentals 2007 2006 Variance Library $ 4,175.00 $ 2,030.00 $ 2,145.00 Senior Center $ 2.182.50 $ 2,938.00 $ (755.50) Parks $ 660.00 $ 420.00 $ 240.00 Sports Fields $ 162.50 $ 93.00 $ 69.50 Monthly Facility Revenue $ 7,180.00 $ 6,481.00 $ 1,699.00 Monthly Revenue Senior Center* $ 12,308.37 $ 15,301.00 $ (2,992.63) Community Services** $ 4,655.00 $ 7,353.00 $ (2,698.00) La Quinta Resident Cards*** $ 3,420.00 $ 8,460.00 $ (5,040.00) Fitness Cards $ 190.00 $ $ 190.00 Total Revenue $ 20,573.37 $ 31,114.00 $ 10,540.63) Revenue Year to Date Facility Revenue $ 61,349.50 $ 31,838.00 $ 29,511.50 Senior Center $ 65,425.87 $ 81,058.00 $ (15,632.13 Community Services $ 38,885.00 $ 51,013.00 $ (12,128.00) La Quinta Resident Cards $ 26,130.00 $ 29,565.00 $ 3,435.00) Fitness Cards $ 2,275.00 $ $ 2,275.00 Total Revenue to Date $ 194,065.37 $ 193,474.00 $ 591.37 * Revenue is down due to fewer Bridge Lesson classes offered for the Winter/Spring 2007 season. ** Decrease in revenue due to limited programming from loss of instructors and advanced excursion enrollments in the prior year. *** Resident cards went to a 3-year membership via City Council's decision as of January 2006. Therefore, revenue this year decreased due to less renewals. 000442' Senior Center Attendance Senior Center Program Report for February 2007 Participation Participation Variance Meetings Meetings 200 2 006 2007 0 Senior Activities ACBL Bridge 409 372 37 4 4 Bridge, Duplicate/Social/Party 363 406 -43 13 13 Evening Dance - Sweetheart's Ball -Monthly 80 40 40 1 1 Birthday Party 35 15 20 1 1 Monthly Luncheon 100 101 -1 1 1 Movie Time 45 56 -111 4 4 Putting Contest 4 7 -3 1 1 Senior Activity Total 1036 997 39 25 25 Senior Leisure Classes Ballroom Dance 30 14 16 4 3 Ballroom Workshop 16 0 16 1 0 Bridge Lessons' 68 128 -60 8 14 Computer Classes 49 47 2 10 10 CPR & First Aid 6 9 -3 1 1 Exercise 49 59 -10 11 11 Golden Tones 50 87 -37 3 4 Hooked on Loos 4 7 -3 4 4 Italian 13 10 3 3 1 Jewlery Making 4 0 4 2 0 Mat Pilates 6 7 -11 7 4 MahJongg 14 0 14 3 0 Quilting 34 37 -3 4 4 Sketch & Draw 48 24 24 4 4 Spanish 31 25 6 4 4 Tai Chi / Tel Chi Arthritis 9 19 -10 3 7 Tap 12 25 -13 4 8 Ukulele Players 15 0 15 4 0 Watercolor 30 52 -221 4 6 Woodcarvers 18 17 1 2 2 Yoga for Health 6 0 6 4 0 Senior Leisure Classes Total 512 567 -55 90 87 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1548 1564 -16 115 112 Senior Services AARP Tax Assistance 86 75 ill 7 7 FIND Food Distribution 189 167 221 4 4 Eisenhower MC Health Screening - Brown Bag 7 5 2 1 1 Hearing Consultation 4 4 0 1 1 HICAP 3 8 -5 1 3 1 1 D Energy Assistance/No fee 25 25 0 3 3 Legal Consultation 5 - 3 2 1 1 Mature Driver Training 8 0 8 1 0 Volunteers 29 25 4 n/a n/a TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 356 3121 44 19 20 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 19041 1876 28 134 132 000243 'Bridge Lesson classes are low due to a new instructor teaching only 3 classes for the season. Last year we had 10 Bridge Lesson classes beginning in January and ending in May. 2007 2006 Variance Volunteer Hours Senior Center 505 221 284 Volunteer Total: 505 221 284 Revenue Senior Center Revenue $12,308.37 $15,300.75 -$2,992.38 Revenue Total: $12,308.37 $15,300.75 -$2,992.38 Feb-07 *Revenue is down due to fewer Bridge Lesson classes offered for the Winter/Spring 2007 season. VU0;144 Parks Items of Interest For February 2007 The Parks, Maintenance Contractor prepared the Civic Center Campus for next month's La Quinta Arts Festival. The fences around the City Hall Expansion were brought in closer to the building once the basement concrete was finished. Thin areas of turf were re -seeded and plants were replaced as needed throughout the Campus. Musco Lighting repaired the light controller at the Sports Complex. The controller stopped functioning correctly for the south fields last week. Two circuit boards were replaced in the controller. Musco is a 24 hour lighting control center that manages the lights for the Sports Complex and the La Quinta Park. The valves in both drinking fountains at Fritz Burns Park were replaced because of leaks. Whereas it is unusual to failures simultaneously, they were repaired immediately. The pathway lighting around the Library has been replaced and is fully operational. The original night lighting was designed more for residential and did not last operationally in the public environment. The new components are more durable and produce better lighting. DEPARTMENT REPORT: g c&'�t 4 Qumrry MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Timothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: March 20, 2007 RE: Public Works Department Report for February 2007 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update; 4. Monthly Summary of Public Works Tasks. Timo by R.Jonasson Public Works Director/City Engineer 000246 a f N J 2 O 0 N w¢ w K W m K lu W ..� U K W h z W N F U 00012A 7 aY w } L� �y �w D Y. C/) (1 } W Z G 0 2 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o G Foo 0 0 0 o 0 in 0 0 v�inoo o c o 0 �n 0 0 oin 0 0 ov�(n 0 0 0 v>0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZED 7 � �? � o W _o nr C) M c7 � C _o � v � Nor N th M a W v� v C p pp Q � M w w LL Y U w x p a O O O 0 W a J N Y oo0x ��rc z Z z co V W W N w-¢ Q ozap a O x x S 0 Ur Z in O Z NmU O Z' ~~~ ¢¢Q�J m J% Q Q- W z"O' (0 J m J m J m J J J Z Z U) Z z z>>> O z> a a a U- OOODUUU O 1-0 >fn?p'�9OOO x xx�7o0 OO' Mza �WaZzz z ci p w wQo LL�6Zzrrr�'>d0000¢--Wo00o d M N N n Vi a F n O apx--JJJS z z — LL w LL LL w J W J w'¢ J x a x H¢¢ a F�-t-¢w d a a N 0 U p Q a Q a Z z n 88 ¢¢¢ D W W d�F�a��»>� ii�LL z 3 gg5� SSS�a 000 J a WWWLL Dn a g U U U U Q O O O U U U Z O ZO m j F F n w t wW� rt w mw j wy W xxt W W n Z V) LLwm .� t ZLL r0xrp N VJ LLO Z �0 wzzw�5z 0 Jwwoov)uW _o LLOzztzC Oow pOK -O.'WU>yzo wN=3z -ON Eggz>x9wozgaga0�iw-w O z LL "0 0 W� Z Z O� f w Z 0(!)WOic9 O Z Z w it w Off=~O w ZU' W ZaC9 C7 Zo W W 2OZH-wf z z- Z x Ufnfn W W J U Q- W �DO�F-wwgm W J R' W W Q%% O O J W Q - O W Q aU' Z_wE W 0 0 Z w w j a V a.af a i al L) U' KxUw�2 >� U> W E g Q a W w WO w w a a��¢? xrFa r-x (� o LL ILZaa CL rx W y z w W w a zg20a-x o O a w D O W wN C) �-a, CC it 02KN_�wO Q It rn y w a f~q f~n W, w U w W N w N U d H fn w F V1 K a w kn n n r r n n n n r r n n n r r n n n r n n n n f m o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 In 0 0 0 N 0 (_O 0 O 0 tD 0 fa 0 N 0 l0 0 r 0 r 0 n� 0 0 W 0 OD 0 Q�5 0 7 Ol 0 N 0 N 0 N O N O N O N N '� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ppp?48 n 0 0 N } Q Ir m w LL h a W o- Z � uw O ]_ J G( F- 2 `ui W 0 0 0 0 0 Li 409 409 b0A 0 W J u� N r to W LL N J Q F- O H O O O O O O O O O H 0 Vi 0 69 0 69 0 O 2 0 uQ m r N 0 2 Ln W W N U. W 7 H H-,00M Z 7 O Q HZ Z W w� 0 5oo w w O 0. 'W ' z62-J Er a �Wgw�- i�UtgLL a��000 00021 1 � o- )O cw OE nVo L ULOL a) ON O) mp co )C a)/cc a(M 0 0 'Y.CaNUpfGyN0,17 OUleO 0 pva0O 0mp C C O C NO O N yLC p �NCL UO a) aNOUUC Q '�''•�La��OOCTc•,,+i7 O 7 S7 N0N _—.yN• -'Id�'�«�=��U�pCOj. ) UCphVYmam~7 OmO4FU.Qnd�YQQ-Q=rOa70 O{IOO�F�YY'QQm��a_c0/nmOI} 4mO�O�OY�t'a�NN�}"•7 ,; yLLmM=YV`poyarnU° LU m V CO 6 "O c Cn H H .O L CL E N CL •• U d `0 E c y m x C U E O YO C — 0 d m 7 O N U co Co 7 L Y ' O U CL CL X co c O p > L Y U 00 c m Y c v m E L 3 U QLO O L Y p O y UL CD w m 3m C U 0 b m m '0 a) O C N C L O E N N N C. D Lo Y (O m m U ) ` O a) m -0 m M U .N O U C. C) m m p N Y O li N N O N l0 C m i a) ra C a CO Q n C N m ) U a O c C O + m N m c m 0. 'O O () Cl N Y C: m Y m "a m o c> W m a(a-' m 0) W a r w U -0 � O m N !_' O > m p m m N a Q c CN 0m Y p Q a 0 Y O '-P o m a x o U 04 ` 01 Y 0 0) O) U �' Y •p L C Y L •N •N •N ,N m p C U c m O m m m O O m D a L)) m a 0) m in m Om U.2: tb rn O O n N 0 0 O O Cl) M I I I ~ n CO r O O O (D N O Op C)O O o I co O I LO O I M O (D O LO LO O O O O M N 0) O O O O O O (DO OD l0 �t I\ N N (o C) <n +n +n +n w a D m a c0 C a m cli N F' Q u') c iU N m -i w N Y N E tD m L Q) m m Y > c U `L (D C c m m 0 Z a > c Q m m NE M w E Q c E C)> •C O C > O — , m > lD O U o a 0 i m p O 0 a � m O c E O O> a coal Eta NN2 E NOS �aE Li C C m c m O L — N N O Y O O U C O fn N _0 > m m c 3 to aEi CL c a a cm N 0) C D -0 Q O Q y U N y N C N C U N m p D y Y c m . U j c Q Q U m p n m ~ to m Q O m 4) m 0 o (� 0 m F- ° > o a a U t1 N U N N m U N m Q Y `p N .� w 'U * C C ._ C p U N Q O C m 7 U .c U b °a N a U y O N M(o > C U 0)0U co O O "0 N C Y O C E N 0 0 co U O U Y N y m 7 C C C C 3 m -0 N E m y 0) •N O) N •0 0 a) •fn aU N C (D O a) N a) N m e c 0 a) p O U O O O O CL 0 O n O L C G � Q O M O O O O O t0 I I I co I I O O O O_ O N F V W M O O W O 00 N O O O pC O M n CL n n to to CL U n in H tn• .n .n O O n O > Q m Y y N O tm N O 0f 'p t�i CO O C f0 •a ? 2 c � m �• E C O O •C — a¢ Y c m N O 0 N d v m C LO m N ;> .S .c `O CO ,0 C a w 7 y 0 U Y Q d y x E 0 LL 0 E y J o (n o IY0 J C O J 0) O — J C> o m Q t0 tD C tD Q m tD y y !" O y 0 0 O: O O a � 0 O m m U O E tL Ncn NQID N y Na3 0 d a OmO000c�Nv�QO�OOHn0rwfmp�mHEdrUcoY—CmNjy.r0 '"94=a°CUC°pr, c CDcm Q ONQmr> NrQ0 F 0 C0 (nO)O QNr. a)�o a)T0 -cc 0O C C c + c 7 07 , L•C�-fC�wYcCy�0ONvNCNw MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PUBLIC WORK TASKS MONTH OF: February, 2007 Employee's Hourly Labor Breakdown Crew#1 Crew#2 Crew#3 Maint. Mg. Code Activity 4 Men 4 Men 2 Men 1 Man I Total 1000 Policing/Inspection 32 100 0 91 141 1001 Pot Hole -Repair/Patching 2 24 0 01 26 1002 CracklJoint Re air 0 5 0 0 5 1003 Pavement Marking/Legends 0 0 0 0 0 1004 Pavement MarkingtStriping 0 0 0 1 1 1005 Curb Painting 0 0 0 0 0 1006 Other Traffic Controls 10 38 0 0 48 1007 Curb & Gutter Re air/Const. 0 0 0 0 0 1008 Other Concrete R airs/Const. 0 0 0 0 0 1009 Street Sign Install New 0 2 0 0 2 1010 Street Sign Repair/Maint 51 15 0 4 70 1011 Debris Removal 8 33 0 2 43 1012 Right of WaMaint. 18 12 37 0 67 1021 CLEAN Catch Basin Inlet/Outlet 0 8 2 0 10 1022 Rondo Channel OutleWault 5 0 0 0 5 1022A Desert Club OutleWauft 0 0 0 0 0 1023 S.D./D.W./C.B. Repair/Maint. 3 40 0 3 46 1024 Gutter/Median Sand Removal 2 22 0 2 26 1025 Street Sweeping (Machine) 144 0 0 0 144 1026 Street Sweeping Hand 4 0 0 0 4 1027 SidewalkBike Path Cleaning 0 0 10 0 10 1028 Dust Control 0 2 0 3 5 1029 Flood Control 0 0 0 0 0 1031 Parks/Retention Basins Inspection/Clean 2 25 56 1 84 1041 Irri Weedin , Shrubs & Tree Trimming 9 5 74 2 90 1051 Landsca eRni ation Contract Mana eme 0 45 56 12 113 1052 Li htin leclrical Contact Management 0 0 0 12 12 1061 Small Tools Repair/Maint. 0 0 2 0 2 1062 Equipment Repair/Maint. 0 2 2 0 4 1063 Vehicle Repair Maint. 1 6 0 0 7 1081 Trash/Litter/Recycable Removal 0 29 10 0 39 1082 Vandalism Repairs 0 4 0 0 4 1083 Graffiti Removal 153 74 36 8 271 1084 Maint. Yard Building Maint. 5 24 2 1 32 1085 Seminarsfrraining 16 5 0 6 27 1086 Special Events 0 0 0 0 0 1087 Citizen Complaints/Requests 103 1 0 0 104 1088 Meeting 0 20 5 20 45 1089 Office Phone, paper work, reports, Misc. 16 21 12 40 89 SUBTOTAL 584 562 304 126 1576 1091 Over Time 15 16 8 0 39 1094 Jury D 0 0 0 0 1095 Sick Leave 24 14 0 0 38 1096 Vacation 0 32 0 26 58 1097 Holiday 32 32 16 8 88 1098 Floating Holiday 0 0 0 0 0 1099 Worker Comp/ Bereavement 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 711 94 24 34 223 TOTAL HOURS 1 6551 6561 3281 160 1799 TOTAL MILES 1 32241 28461 14021 260 773 00?51 Department Report: LA UI TA P@LICI Served by the Riverside Courtly SherhTs Deparmwrn Police Department Monthly Report February -- 2007 Prepared for 4 000254 La Quinta Police Department SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY REPORT Captain Walter Meyer Chief of Police (Number in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day.) 02/O1 Thursdav (78 0200 hours — Sgt. Hoyt stopped Julio Anaya on Ave. 52 and Monroe St. for traffic violations. Anaya was subsequently arrested for a felony forgery, burglary and narcotics warrant. His passenger, Phillip Trail, was also arrested for an outstanding narcotic wan -ant. Both were booked into Indio jail. 0935 hours — SET team deputies conducted a pedestrian check in the area of Avenida Herrera and Calle Durango. A male juvenile was found to be in possession of a small amount of marijuana. He was cited and released. 1010 hours — SET team deputies conducted a traffic stop in the area of Avenida Bermudas and Calle Tampico. During the stop, they obtained consent to search the vehicle and located illegal fireworks. The driver, David Lewis, was cited and released for illegal possession of dangerous explosives. 1105 hours — SET team deputies conducted a pedestrian check in the 79900 block of Hwy. 111. During the contact they arrested Eduardo Sabalaza for a misdemeanor warrant. He was cited and released. 1110 hours — SET team deputies conducted a vehicle check at Calle Chihuahua and Avenida Carranza. They made contact with Carlos Nieves who displayed symptoms of drug influence and was arrested. Nieves was also found to be on probation for petty theft with priors. Nieves was booked at the Indio Jail for being under the influence of a controlled substance and for a violation of probation. 1125 hours — SET team deputies conducted a pedestrian check in the parking lot of Home Depot and contacted John Brassfield. Four stolen credit cards were located in Brassfreld's possession. He was arrested for possession of stolen property and was transported to the Indio Jail where he required an okay - to -book. He was subsequently admitted into John F. Kennedy Hospital. He was released due to his medical condition; however, charges will be filed against him at a later time. 1205 hours — SET team deputies conducted a pedestrian check in the 52900 block of Avenida Carranza. Conrad Eichel provided a false name because he had warrants for his arrest. He was arrested for providing false information to a police officer and for two misdemeanor traffic warrants. He was booked at the Indio Jail. 1755 hours — Dep. Villegas responded to a report of a theft from Kohl's. Silvia Moreno Flores and Alvaro Garcia were arrested for commercial burglary and booked into Indio jail. 2048 hours. — Dep. Wiggs conducted a traffic stop at Washington St. and Ave. 48 for traffic violations. Dep. Wiggs arrested the driver, Felipe Rodriguez, for driving without a license. A search of the vehicle lead to the discovery of a sawed off shotgun with the serial number removed, box of shotgun shells and a ski mask in the trunk. Dep. Wiggs arrested both Rodriguez and the passenger of the vehicle, Cesar Reyes, for Weapons Violations. Both were booked into the Indio jail. Report by Dep. Wiggs. ��55 02/02 Friday (87) 0830 hours — Dep. Moore arrested a male juvenile for a felony no -bail grand theft warrant. The juvenile was truant from La Quints Middle School and was located at his home. He was booked at the Indio Juvenile Hall for the warrant and being truant. 2030 hours - Deputies Villegas and Wiggs contacted a male juvenile at Westward Ho and Adams St. The juvenile was found to have an outstanding warrant out of Orange County and was arrested. 2328 hours — Deputies Wiggs and Villegas contacted Kelsey Botts at Calle Chillon and Ave. Madrid. Botts was arrested for Drunk in Public and transported to the jail. 02/03 Saturday (50) 1838 hours — Dep. Nieburger responded to Target Department Store in reference to a shoplifter. Dep. Nieburger contacted Joy Susan Miller at the bus stop on Hwy. 111 and Adams. Store security personnel positively identified Miller as the person who shoplifted items from the store. Miller was arrested for shoplifting, possession of 1.5 grams of Methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia. Miller was transported to the Indio Jail and booked. 02/04 Sunday (52) 1235 hours- Dep. Kim responded to a shoplifting call in the 78900 block of Highway 111. He arrested Steven Vega for shoplifting and booked him into the Indio Jail. 1930 hours — Dep. Russell responded to Hwy. I I I and Simon Dr. in reference to a man down call. Dep. Russell contacted Gary Richard Rehmer who was highly intoxicated and unable to care for himself. Rehmer was found to have a BAC of .33. Rehmer booked at the Indio Jail for being intoxicated in public and three misdemeanor warrants. 2140 hours — Dep. Nieburger responded to Jefferson and Ave. 52 reference to a report of an individual in the middle of the road. Kimberly Barker was found to be running in the street and refused to cooperate with arriving deputies. Deputies were required to physically restrain Barker in order to place her under arrest. Barker was later transported to the Indio Jail and booked for resisting arrest and public intoxication. 02/05 Mondav (83 1000 hours — SET team deputies two male juveniles for vandalism following a graffiti investigation. The investigation revealed that both juveniles had vandalized city property. Both juveniles were booked into the Indio Juvenile Hall. 1828 hours — Dep. Russell responded to Lowe's Horne Improvement Store in reference a report of a theft. Caroline Peckham, the victim, told Deputy Russell that a man had grabbed her purse out of her cart and had caused her to fall to the ground. Peckham suffered minor scraps and bruises but declined medical attention. 2131 hours- Dep. Feldmand responded to Kohl's Department Store to handle a shoplifting report. Ile arrested Irma Felix and Carolina Felix for Commercial burglary and providing false identity to an officer. They were both taken to Indio jail. 2226 hours — Dep. Bloomquist conducted a vehicle stop at Jefferson and Ave. 52 where he made contact with Roberto Mendiola. Mendiola was determined to be driving under the influence of alcohol and was transported to the Indio Jail. 02/06 Tuesday (7 No Significant Activity 02/07 Wednesday (70) 0045 hours — Dep. Glasper stopped Mathew Flaherty on Ave. 50 and Washington for traffic violations. Flaherty, a parolee, was arrested for being a felon in possession of a handgun and for being under the influence. Flaherty's passenger, Richard Baudruaw, was also arrested for an outstanding felony theft warrant. Both were booked into Indio jail. 1000 hours — SET team deputies, working in conjunction with the Coachella PD CAT and District Teams, served a search warrant in the 81300 block of Avenida Esmeralda in the city of Indio for stolen property. The suspects, Harold Albrecht and Shawn Albrecht were arrested at the residence without incident. Both subjects were booked into Indio Jail. 2030 hours — Dep. Taylor contacted Alex Lopez at Dune Palms and Hwy 111. Lopez was arrested for being under the influence and was booked into the jail. 2045 hours — Dep. Taylor conducted a traffic stop at Auto Center Dr. and Hwy 111. The driver of the vehicle, Chad Johnson, was arrested for drug paraphernalia and possession of marijuana. A passenger, Omar Zamora, was also arrested for the same charges. 02/08 Thursday (94) 0045 hours — Dep. Taylor conducted a traffic stop at Hwy 111 and Washington St. The driver, Funisha Cantu, was arrested and booked into Indio jail for possession of switchblade knife and a DUI warrant. 0118 hours — Dep. Wiggs conducted a traffic stop at Ave. 50 and Washington St. and arrested Marco Zorzetta for DUI. Zorzetta was booked into Indio jail. 0900 hours — SET team deputies conducted a pedestrian check of two subjects in the parking lot of the Taco Bell located at Hwy. 111 and La Quints, Dr. Arrested were Priscilla Mejia and Henry Rivera. Both had parolee -at -large warrants for their arrest. Rivera also provided deputies with a false name. Incident to arrest, deputies located a syringe and .1 g of heroin in Rivera's possession. Both were arrested for their warrants. Additional charges of possession of heroin, possession of a syringe and providing false information to a peace officer were filed against Rivera. 1130 hours - Cpl Hughes conducted a parole search at a residence in the 78000 block of Galaxy. Mitchell Germino was arrested for possession of methamphetamine for sales (10 grams), under the influence of a controlled substance and parole violation. He was booked at the Indio Jail. 02/09 Friday (77) 0940 hours — Dep. McAllen responded to a residence in the 54000 block of Avenida Velasco reference a disturbance. Roderick Deas had threatened to kill the victim and refused to leave the victim's residence. He was arrested for criminal threats, trespassing, possession of marijuana and booked at the Indio Jail. 02/10 Saturday (86) 1005 Hours: Corp. Adams conducted a vehicle stop at Avenue 54 and Madison for speeding. His investigation led to the arrest of Aaron Davis for driving under the influence of alcohol under the age of 21. 1025 hours — Dep. Trower responded to the area of Hwy 111 and Washington Avenue in reference to an act of indecent exposure. Deputy Trower contacted an adult male at the bus stop who was positively identified by victim. Jose Guzman was arrested for indecent exposure and child molestation and booked x _ at the Indio Jail. 1500 hours — Deputies responded to the area of Avenida Mendoza and Hidalgo in reference to suspicious persons. The reporting person advised two juveniles were walking down the street and were seen looking 000257 in neighbor's yards. Dep. Chancellor detained a male juvenile who matched the suspect's descriptions. Dep. Kim arrived and contacted a female juvenile who was the male's girlfriend. She was found to have a toy handgun (9mm replica) concealed in her purse. She was also in possession of alcohol. The male subject was very uncooperative and attempted to ran away. Deputy Chancellor gave chase and apprehended him a short distance away and placed the male in the back seat of the patrol car where he attempted to break the windows and continued to resist. He was booked at the Indio Juvenile Hall for resisting an officer. The male was later found to be on probation for burglary and stolen vehicle. The female was transported to the Indio Station where she was released to her mother with charges for possession of alcohol to be filed out of custody. 2102 hours — Dep. Nieburger responded to Wal-Mart in reference to three juvenile shoplifters in custody. The three juveniles were transported to the Indio Station and released to their parents. 02/11 Sunday (73) 1730 hours — Dep. Adams responded to a report of shoplifting at Wal-Mart that resulted in the stabbing of two store employees. Two employees from Wal-Mart contacted the suspect outside of the store after observing him concealing items in a bag. A physical altercation ensued and the suspect stabbed both employees with a knife. The suspect fled in a brown older van registered to Victor Fonseca. During the investigation Fonseca was identified as the suspect. Fonseca is a parolee at large and is considered armed and dangerous. 2230 hours — Dep. Bloomquist responded to the 79900 block of Julee in reference to a report of unknown trouble. Dep. Bloomquist contacted Kristi Yates who said she and her husband, Paul Yates, were arguing. In the altercation she was thrown to the ground causing minor scratches and scraps to her arms. Paul Yates was arrested for domestic battery and transported to the Indio Jail. 02/12 Monday (101) 1030 hours - Set Team deputies arrested Joe Aaron Hinojosa for three outstanding warrants following a traffic stop at Ave 50 x Park. Hinojosa was booked into the jail. 02/13 Tuesday (144) 1055 hours- Dep. Orr responded to a suspicious circumstances call in the 51800 block of Avenida Carranza. Rodrigo Alonso was arrested for an outstanding felony arrest warrant. Alonso was booked into the Indio Jail. 2000 hours — Dep. Taylor responded to Hwy I I I and La Quinta Drive in reference to a report of a traffic collision. Investigation revealed that a vehicle traveling westbound on Hwy. 111 struck a vehicle that had attempted to make an illegal left turn into the Best Buy parking lot. Marsha Jefferies received severe injures to her neck and back and was transported to Desert Hospital. Dep. Taylor responded to Desert Hospital and contacted the driver of the vehicle that had made the illegal left turn, Lucille Budinsky, who was deemed to be driving under the influence of alcohol. Budinsky was transported to the Indio Jail and booked for DUI. 02/14 Wednesdav (113 0011 hours — Dep. Dmfton responded to the 52100 block of Ave. Juarez, regarding a person possibly being under the influence of narcotics. Robert Ordaz was arrested for being under the influence. Dep. Dragon obtained consent from Ordaz, after his arrest, to search his bedroom and located methamphetamine in the room Possession of methamphetamine was added to his charges. Ordaz booked into Indio jail. 0147 hours- Dep. Martinez stopped John Peters at Ave. 54 and Madison St. Peters was found to be in possession of methamphetamine and booked into the Indio jail. 0001258, 2130 hours — Dep. Krachman responded to the 78900 block of Hwy I I I in reference to a report of a burglary in progress. When he arrived, Dep. Krachman saw a suspect exiting the Target store carrying two televisions. Loss Prevention Officers told Deputy Krachman that the suspect had stolen the televisions from the store. Deputy Krachman attempted to stop the suspect, Dennis Lightfoot, but he fled from the location onto Hwy 111. Lightfoot hit several parked and unoccupied vehicles and, at one point, attempted to run over a deputy. Lightfoot's vehicle became stuck in the sand and deputies took him into custody. Lightfoot was booked into the Indio jail for Commercial Burglary, Felony Assault on a Peace Officer, and Felony Evading. 02/15 Thursday (86) 1938 hours — Dep. Knight responded to the 54700 block of Ave. Carranza in reference to a reported act of domestic violence. Robert Pesheck was arrested and booked him into Indio jail. 2040 hours — Dep. Wiggs responded to a report of a vehicle theft in progress Home Depot. Dep. Wiggs located the stolen vehicle with Randy Bojorquez inside it. Bojorquez was arrested for vehicle theft. Bojorquez was transported to JFK Hospital for an okay to book due to pre-existing medical issues unrelated to the arrest. 02/16 Friday (77) 0940 hours — Dep. Reynolds arrested Jesus Garcia for traffic warrants following a traffic stop 1120 hours — Dep. McAnallen contacted Michael Higgins in the 53300 block of Avenida Villa. Higgins admitted to possessing about 6 grams of cocaine and was booked into the Indio Jail. 1700 hours- Dep. Reynolds investigated an assault with a deadly weapon call involving a mentally impaired 12-year-old male juvenile. The subject had been involved in a disturbance with several female juveniles at a community park. The subject was located at his house and later taken to Indio Mental Health for a 72-hour evaluation. The subject was identified as being bi-polar and having autism 2106 hours- Dep. Bloomquist conducted a pedestrian check of Jonathan Banuelos at Calle Sinaloa and Ave. Velasco. Bloomquist attempted to arrest Banuelos for two outstanding felony warrants. Banuelos fled but was captured after a brief foot pursuit. and was booked at the Indio Jail. 02/17 Saturday (51) No Significant Activity 02/18 Sunday (50) 0715 hours- Dep. Bloomquist arrested Samuel Medina for prowling and being drunk in public. Witnesses reported seeing Medina in the yard of a residence in the 53000 block of Ave. Juarez and trying to open the front door. 1954 hours — Dep. Knight responded to a traffic collision at Avenida Velasco and Calle Nogales. The driver of a 2007 Harley Davison motorcycle said he had collided with a motor vehicle causing him to lay his motorcycle down on the pavement. The driver of the vehicle left the scene of the collision .Dep. Knight responded to the 52-600 block of Avenida Velasco and contacted Mario Gomez who admitted to being involved in the collision. Gomez said he left the scene due to not having a driver's license. Gomez was transported to the Indio Jail and booked for leaving the scene of an accident. 2200 hours — Dep. Nieburger responded to the 79300 block of Stonegate in reference to a report of a domestic disturbance. Dep. Nieburger determined that Alice Raio had struck her husband, Eugene Rain, with a chair. Mr. Rain had a bruise on his right arm and a small abrasion on his left arm. Alice Raio was highly intoxicated and was arrested for assaulting her husband. 000259 02/19 Mondav (76 0320 hours — Dep. Knight responded to a suspicious vehicle on Avenue 52 and Silver Rock Way. It was reported that a black Dodge truck was blocking the above intersection. Alvaro Escadem was found sitting in the driver's seat of the truck and had a strong odor of alcohol. He was arrested for DUI. 0800 hours — Cpl. Adams responded to a minor injury traffic collision at Washington St. north of Highland Palms. Maria Moreno was driving southbound on Washington St., and made an unsafe lane change in front of a Sun Bus. The Sun Bus struck Moreno's vehicle, causing it to spin and roll twice coming to rest on its wheels on the frontage road of Washington St. Eight people were in the bus and only one was transported for complaint of pain to his head. 1300 hours — Cpl. Adams responded to a report of a hit-and-run collision within the Home Depot parking lot. Frank Johnson parked his vehicle in the parking lot of Home Depot and when he retained to his vehicle he was contacted by a witness who told him that the vehicle had been struck by an unknown male driving a Cadillac who failed to stop and fled the scene without providing proper documentation. The witness provided a license plate number for the suspect vehicle. This case is pending further investigation by Cpl. Adams. 2229 hours — Dep. Bloomquist conducted a vehicle check at Calle Tecate and Avenida Ramirez. Joshua Voss had been seen sleeping in the vehicle. Voss was found to have felony warrants for burglary. Voss was transported to the Indio Jail and booked for the wan -ants 02/20 Tuesday (82) 1530 hours — Dep. Bawdon responded to the 78900 block of Hwy. 111 in reference of two shoplifters in custody. Maria Alonso and Christina Nolasco were observed by security personnel taking tags off clothing and leaving the store without paying for the merchandise. Alonso and Nolasco were arrested for commercial burglary and booked at the Indio Jail. 02/21 Wednesday (82) 1530 Hours- La Quinta Set team deputies arrested Paul Anthony Ibanez for an outstanding felony warrant for burglary following an occupied vehicle check in front of Ross Dept Store. 1820 hours — Dep. Pereyda conducted a traffic stop at Hwy 111 and Jefferson and contacted George Rubalcava. Rubalcava showed signs of intoxication and was arrested for Driving Under the Influence and booked into the Indio jail. 2230 hours- Dep. Knight responded to a disturbance in the 52500 block of Ave. Madero. Victor Berry was arrested for resisting a peace officer and Michael Berry was arrested for being drunk in public. 02/22 Thursday (86) 0100 hours- Dep. Drafton responded to a report of an unattended death in the 45200 block of Sunbrook. Frank Dukette had passed away in his sleep. There were no signs of foul play. 1145 hours — La Quinta SET deputies responded to the 53000 block of Avenida Herrera regarding a citizen report of suspicious activity. They contacted Jennie Rosales and arrested her for being under the influence of a controlled substance. They also contacted George Contreras and arrested him for being under the influence. They also located Fernando Baca who was arrested for an outstanding felony warrant. 1555 hours — Dep. Reynolds arrested Richard Gains for commercial burglary of the Stater Brothers Market. Gains was booked into the Indio Jail. 002GO 02/23 Fridav (61 1552 hours- Dep. Hendry responded to a suspicious persons call in the 48100 block of Eisenhower Dr. During the investigation, Dep. Hendry arrested Gustavo Adolfo Castaneda for a no bail juvenile warrant. During a search of Castaneda's vehicle, Dep. Hendry located approx. 39.7 grams of Marijuana packaged for sales and approx. $1,000 in cash. Castaneda was arrested for possession of Marijuana for sell and the warrant. 02/24 Saturdav (58 0059 hours- Dep. Drafton responded to the 44300 block of Foxtail Dr. in reference to a report of an assault with a deadly weapon. Investigation determined that a 17-year-old male juvenile had been stabbed three times by another teenager. The victim was transported to JFK, where he received treatment for his wounds. Detectives followed up on investigative leads and arrested the suspect at a residence in the La Quinta Cove. The suspect was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon and booked at the Indio Juvenile Hall. 1543 hours — Dep. Bawdon arrested Patrick Sheriden for grand theft after he had taken items from Home Depot without paying. Sheriden was booked into the Indio Jail. 1800 hours — Dep. Bawdon responded to the 53000 block of Avenida Carranza regarding a report of the brandishing of a weapon. Manuel Herrera Ramirez was identified as a possible suspect and was found to have an outstanding felony warrant for attempt homicide. Ramirez was booked into the Indio Jail for the warrant. 02/25 Sundav (61 1315 hours- Dep. I. White conducted a pedestrian check at Avenida La Fonda and Avenida Bermudas. He arrested Emil Pacelli for an outstanding felony assault with a deadly weapon warrant. Pacelli was booked into the Indio Jail. 1903 hours — Dep. Russell responded to an attempted suicide in the 51400 block of Avenida Vallejo. Debra Sawyer said she had taken an overdose of prescription medication. Sawyer told deputies that family issues motivated her conduct. Sawyer was transported to JFK and will be transported to mental heath upon clearance from JFK medical staff. 2153 hours — Corp. Navarro and Dep. Berry responded to a 911 call in the 51400 block of Avenida Obregon. Family members told deputies that Antonio Rodriquez came home and proceeded to argue with his girlfriend. An altercation ensued which resulted in Rodriquez's girlfriend receiving bruises and a red swollen left eye. Rodriquez was arrested for domestic battery and booked at the Indio Jail. 02/26 Monday (81) 0050 hours — Dep. Nieburger responded to the 50600 block of Eisenhower Dr. in reference to a traffic collision. A 2001 Ford F-150 pickup had driven into the Silver Hawk Apartment sign located in front of the complex. Alonzo Barajas, the driver, was unhurt but found to be driving while under the influence of alcohol. Barajas was transported to JFK for an OK to book and later transported to the Indio Jail and booked. 02/27 Tuesdav(130) 1100 Hours — La Quinta Set Team deputies arrested Kelly Lawrence following a traffic stop at Monroe and Ave 58. Lawrence was found to have an outstanding warrant from San Luis Obispo. Lawrence was booked into the jail. 000261 02/28 Wednesday (68) 0228 hours — Corp. Northrup responded to a report of a male passed out in the driver's seat of a vehicle at the gas pumps at the Circle K (Highway 111 X Washington). Corp. Northrup arrested Jose Pinela Jr for driving under the influence. Pinela was booked into the Indio Jail. 0818 hours — Dep. Hughes responded to the 77900 block of Avenida Montezuma regarding a trespasser. Jose Elias was arrested for trespassing and booked into jail. TotalCalls for Service: 2,234 000?02, Deputy Kevin Moore La Quinta MS Paige MS Truman ES Adams ES Franklin ES CITY OF LA QUINTA School Resource Officer Report February 2007 Summary of Activitv Type of Activi Number of Incidents Reports 4 Arrests 1 Traffic Stops 1 Business Checks 4 Truant 3 Vehicle Checks 8 Follow-up 8 Pedestrian Checks 12 YAT Referral 8 District Attorney Filings 2 Citations 4 SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY 1. Investigated a report of a student igniting fireworks on an occupied school bus. Investigation led to the identification and confession of the student involved. The incident and involved student were referred to the District Attorney's Office. 2. A thorough investigation led to criminal charges being filed against the parent of a middle school student for contributing to excessive truancy and absences from school. 3. 1 responded to two reports of a medical emergency. The first involved a report of a child not breathing at the nearby YMCA facility. The second involved a middle school student experiencing a panic attack. Medical personnel also responded and both individuals were treated accordingly. 4. Attended a two day search warrant training school. 000963 Deputy Eric Speir La Quinta High School CITY OF LA QUINTA School Resource Officer Report February 2007 Summary of Activitv Type of Activity Number of Incidents Criminal Reports 6 Non -Criminal Incidents 2 Arrests 2 District Attorney Filings 6 Y.A.T. Referral 3 Vehicle Checks 2 Pedestrian Checks 2 Follow -Up 0 Truancy 2 Investigation of the theft of a cell phone led to the identification of the suspect and the recovery of the phone. The suspect was referred to Y.A.T. An on campus fight resulted in minor injuries and the assailant was identified and 3rges were filed with the District Attorneys office as well as a Y.A.T. referral. Two students were found to be in possession of weapons and charges were filed with the strict Attorneys office. One student was in possession of metal knuckles and the second dent had a homemade knife in his possession. I conducted an investigation of the theft of gas from school district vans parked at the high cool. Video surveillance tape allowed me to positively identify the suspect vehicle. Contact h the registered owner of the vehicle led to his arrest on unrelated charges. Charges were d with the District Attorneys office. Three students were hospitalized due to an overdose of "over the counter" medications. e student supplier of the medication was identified. fl264 CITY OF LA QUINTA Business District Deputy Report February 2007 Deputy Marlayna Covington Summa orACUVI Type of Activity Number Business Management Contacts 5 Training Classes and Hours 2 / 70 hrs. Suspects Arrested / Charged 5 SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY To enhance my effectiveness, I attended two classes at the Institute of Criminal Investigation. One class focused on search warrant preparation and execution. The second class addressed identity theft and appropriate investigative techniques. Through the classes I gained valuable knowledge and insight that I hope to pass on to members of our business community. Working in cooperation with other deputies, I assisted on the serving of two search warrants. As a result, evidence was developed that led to multiple arrests, recovery of stolen property and the seizure of illegal narcotics. Leads developed during a credit card fraud investigation allowed me to identify the suspect and obtain a warrant for his arrest. I located the suspect at his residence and took him into custody without incident. I was also able to add charges for possession of drug paraphernalia. During an investigation into a grand theft I was able to determine the idenity of two suspects. I located the suspects in Cathedral City and charges were filed with the District Attorney. 000265 CITY OF LA QUINTA Traffic Services Team Report February 2007 Summary of Activitv Type of Activity Number of Incidents Speed Violations 80 Fail to Yield 35 Turning Violations 5 Calls for Service & B/U's 8 Red light 44 Stop Sin 0 Lane Change Violation 0 Seat Belt Violations 23 Child Seat Violations 1 DUI Arrests 1 Misdemeanor Arrest 6 Felony Arrest 0 Warnings 4 Tows 15 Injury T/C 1 Non -injury T/C 8 Sus ended DL 16 Non-Movin 89 Total Citations 225 CITY OF LA QUINTA Special Enforcement Team February 2007 Deputy Timothy White Deputy John Alexander Corporal Ruben Perez Deputy Ismael Celaya Deputy Damen Butvidas Sergeant Matt Jimenez Summary of Activitv for the Month of February 2007 Type of Activity # of Incidents Type of Activity # of Incidents Programs 3 Bicycle Patrol 0 Vehicle Checks/Sto s 50 Arrest Warrants Served 6 Pedestrian Checks 35 Search Warrants 2 Follow-ups 13 Parole Searches 25 Citations Issued 6 Arrests/Filings 29 La Quints SET conducted a follow-up from a citizen's complaint about drug activity at a home in the La Quints Cove. SET team deputies made contact with the occupants of the residence and placed three of them under arrest. Two were arrested for maintaining a location for the purpose of using illicit drugs and for being under the influence of a controlled substance. A third person was arrested for being under the influence of a controlled substance and for resisting arrest. Further investigation also found that the third suspect had an outstanding felony arrest warrant. La Quints SET team deputies wrote, obtained and served a search warrant related to an ongoing commercial burglary investigation. When the arrest warrant was served, deputies recovered stolen property and arrested two suspects at the location. La Quints SETpardcipated in a multi -agency arrest warrant sweep targeting multiple locations across the Coachella Valley. The cooperative effort resulted in numerous felony arrests, the recovery of stolen property and the seizure of several weapons. La Quints SET is currently working on several cases which will lead to the arrests and/or additional charges for persons sought during the month of February. 000267 CITY OF LA QUINTA Community Service Officer Report February 2007 C.S.O. Monica Santillanes C.S.O. Thomas Fowler Summary of Activitv Type of Activit Number of Incidents Bur lary Investigations 3 Grand Theft Reports 6 PettyTheft Reports 4 Vandalism/Malicious Mischief Reports 10 Traffic Collision Response 12 Vehicle Code or Parking Citations 36 Abandoned Vehicles Tagged/WarningTaggedNVarning 14 Towed Vehicles 3 Lost or Found Property Reports 5 Stolen Vehicle Report 1 Custodial / Non -Custodial Transport 18 Training 0 Miscellaneous Calls 7 000?_68 CITY OF LA QUINTA ....mmunity Programs Coordinator Report February 2007 Thomas Fowler Community Service Officer II Summary of Activity Type of Activit 11 Number Crime Prevention Articles and Reports 3 Community Programs 2 Community Meetings Attended 5 C.P.T.E.D.Inspections 7 Patrol Duties 30 hrs. 1. Presented a community safety and crime prevention display as part of a crime prevention and self-defense event sponsored by a local business entity. Coordinated with Valley Crime Stoppers to provide a $50.00 cash reward for an anonymous informant who provided information leading to the solving of a felony vandalism incident taking place on a D.S.U.£ school bus. Participated in an Emergency Preparedness program sponsored by a community Home Owners Association. Danese Maldonado Volunteer Coordinator CITY OF LA QUINTA Citizens On Patrol Community Policing Office Monthly Volunteer Report February 2007 Meet Your Volunteers -- Mr. Willard Dill Willard joined the LQPD volunteer program in May of 2003 in response to an article in the La Quinta GEM. Willard was one of the first five volunteers to complet the volunteer training program and was assigned to staff the Community Policng Office. Willard had previously served as a volunteer chaplain with the Sacramento Police Department. Willard is very active in his church and, though slowed down by heart surgery, he still has been able to contribute 875 hours of volunteer service. Willard's military experience has equipped him for specialized duties related to the ATF and firearms related matters. Willard and his wife, Hannalore, live in the La Quinta Cove. Summa of Activity Community Policing Office Number Citizens On Patrol Number Monthly Volunteer Hours 233 Community Events 1 Hours YTD 398 Business Checks 3 Hours 4/03 to Present 11,422 Traffic Control 1 CPO Monthly Visits 120 Courtesy Notifications 12 CPO YTD Visits 262 Public Assists 1 CPO Visits 4/03 to Present 7,828 Debris Removal 5 Training Hours 30 lVacation Checks 37 New Volunteers In Training 4 1 Patrol Hours 101.5 YTD Patrol Hours 197 Total Program Hours 1 583 000270 CITY OF LA QUINTA Post 503 Explorer Report February 2007 Corporal Andy Gerrard Post 503 Explorers at the Chandler, Arizona Police Department "Explorer Tactical Competition". Post 503 Explorers continue to develop their skills through a systematic monthly training program February training topics included patrol tactics, traffic control, physical conditioning and crowd control. In addition, guest speakers from both the Riverside County Sheriffs Department and Fire Department presented training in bomb recognition. Post 503 Explorers were able to immediately use their training in crowd and traffic control as they volunteered to serve at the Riverside County National Date Festival. Members successfully and efficiently directed thousands of drivers in the main parking area, assisted with locating lost children within the fairgrounds, staffed the Sheriffs Department recruiting booth and assisted at the entry and exit gates. Both Sheriffs Department and Date Festival supervision commended Post 503 members for their outstanding volunteer service. )king ahead, Post 503 members are already preparing for the Riverside County Sheriffs :)artment Explorer Competition in May which will be held at the Ben Clark Regional Training nter. In June, Explorer members will be competing in Las Vegas, Nevada at the "Ex -Con" npetition. August will find post members returning to the Ben Clark Regional Training Center the week-long Police Explorer Basic Training Academy. 000?71 Department Report: LA Ul TA P@LICI Served by the Riverside County Sherf Fs Deparrtnern Crime Statistics Summary January -- 2007 Prepared for 00027?. PART I: 2 4 5 9 10 11 12 13 TRAFFIC CITY OF LA QUINTA Crime Comparison -- Janua CRIME January January YTD 2007 YTD 2006 2007 2006 AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS 0 1 0 1 BURGLARY 39 57 39 57 BURGLARY - VEHICLE 16 24 16 24 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 7 11 7 11 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 NARCOTICS VIOLATIONS 15 16 15 16 ROBBERY 2 2 2 2 ROBBERY -CAR JACKING 0 0 0 0 SEX CRIME FELONY 3 4 3 4 SEX CRIME MISDEMEANOR 1 1 1 1 SIMPLE ASSAULTS 5 12 5 12 THEFT 79 116 79 116 VEHICLE THEFT 11 20 11 20 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 318 177 318 177 TIC NON -INJURY 31 27 31 27 DUI 27 9 27 9 TIC INJURY 15 4 15 4 TIC FATAL 0 0 0 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION - JANUARY 2007** TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME MINUTES NUMBER OF INCIDENTS EMERGENCY 4.4 1 ROUTINE 10.78 1236 ** Data from Riverside Co. Sheriffs Department Data Warehouse, Average Response Time Report. 00027 3 Crime Distribution Table Jan-07 % of Total Jan-06 % of Total 1 AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS 0 0.00% 1 0.38% 2 BURGLARY 39 21.91% 57 21.59% 3 BURGLARY - VEHICLE 16 8.99% 24 9.09% 4 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 7 3.93% 11 4.17% 5 HOMICIDE 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 NARCOTICS VIOLATIONS 15 8.43% 16 6.06% 7 ROBBERY 2 1.12% 2 0.76% 8 ROBBERY - CAR JACKING 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 SEX CRIME FELONY 3 1.69% 4 1.52% 10 SEX CRIME MISDEMEANOR 1 0.56% 1 0.38% 11 SIMPLE ASSAULTS 5 2.81% 12 4.55% 12 THEFT 79 44.38% 116 43.94% 13 VEHICLE THEFT 11 6.18% 20 7.58% Total 178 100.00% 1 99.62% CITY OF LA QUINTA January 2007 Crime Distribution 90 79 80 70 50 39 40 30 IA 20 11 10 0 7 0 1 0 a >Ci >> >> rxy m C7 w t-an w <c r' nr r> <r �� z n c�� x <_z z p 9 w �m w O W x CD z� fi YPW o� Z7y < dx � ma_ Z m a cb y r-r —jm < r m x H 000274 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Month to Month Crime Comparison - January o January 2007 nJanuary ZING an a <e o o a o as rea �y x ea — e� � aa r r eay _n a0 ea am Ox m -3 a .'a rye n— � O— a xa <3 cnz yea ea [a O y C1 Cla [a � � Year to Date Crime Comparison - January 7 =YTD 6 140 a w Month to Month Traffic Activity Comparison - January ®January 2007 a January 2006 350 300 - 250 - 200 - 150 - 100 - 50 0 TRAFFIC TIC NON -INJURY DUI T/C INJURY TIC FATAL CITATIONS 000276 �� x Year to Date Traffic Activity Comparison - January =YTD 7 6 350 300— 250 200 UI- 150 100 50 31 77 94 4 0 0 TRAFFIC TIC NON -INJURY DUI T/C INJURY TIC FATAL CITATIONS Month to Month Calls for Service Comparison January 2007 2500 2 212 2000 1739 ® 07-Jan 07 06-Jan 1500 12111 1122 975 1000 617 500 0 Total Non- Criminal Criminal Year to Date Calls for Service Comparison 2500 2212 2000 1739 1500 1237 n YTD 2007 1122 m YTD 2006 975 1000 s ,e. 617 tl 500 l 0 Total Non -Criminal Criminal 0001.77 Imo! i W COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Continued Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council Certifying Environmental Assessment 2006-573, Approving Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 for the Use and Operation of the Signature Pool, and Site Development Permit 2006-865 for the Architectural and Landscaping Plans for a Signature Pool Facility for the Property Located on the West Side of Avenida Obregon, Approximately 150 Feet South of Avenida Fernando on the La Quinta Resort Grounds. Applicant: CNL Desert Resorts, LLP RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent CEQA compliance documents and approving Site Development Permit 2006-865 and Conditional Use Permit 2007-102, subject to the Conditions of Approval. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of February 13, 2007, voted 4-0 in favor of recommending certification of the Addendum. The Planning Commission then on a 2-2 vote (with Commissioner Daniels absent) failed to adopt a Resolution which would have recommended approval of Site Development Permit (SDP) 2006-865, subject to Conditions. The Community Development Department recommended approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of March 20, 2007, voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution 2007-011 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2007- 102, subject to revised Conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The applicant's stated purpose for seeking to make these modifications to the Resort is A to increase occupancy levels in the off season. According to the applicant, occupancy levels in the summer average 48%, as opposed to the levels in the peak season, which average 75%. The City receives Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT") when the hotelrooms are occupied. In addition, the City receives sales tax revenues from of expenditures by hotel visitors. The City staff has not estimated the expected increa ead� 8 in tax revenues associated with the Signature Pool proposal. However, the applicant estimates the expected increase to be between $350,000 and $550,000 annually. In the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year, the City received $4,118,768 in TOT revenue from the Resort. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Environmental Review The La Quinta Community Development Department has caused to be prepared Environmental Assessment 2006-573 (An Addendum To Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Number 41 and to a series of subsequently approved environmental review documents) for this Site Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Of 1970, as Amended (Attachment 1). The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed modifications to the La Quinta Resort do not require a Subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration, since the circumstances described in Section 15162 of The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines do not exist, in that there will be no new or more significant impacts than those disclosed in the prior EIR Number 41 and the CEQA compliance documents approved subsequently. The modifications proposed, and the circumstances under which the modifications would be carried out, do not require substantial changes to the previous EIR, or the subsequent environmental documents, due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there is no new information of substantial importance which would trigger the requirement of a Subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the Community Development Department is recommending certification of Environmental Assessment 2006-573 if the project is approved. Surrounding Land Uses North: Tennis Villas and Date Palm grove South: Tennis courts, Tennis Villas, Resort Homes and Spa La Quinta East: Avenida Obregon with the Resort grounds beyond West: Tennis courts and Tennis Villas General Plan/Specific plan Designation 1000279 CT (Tourist Commercial) Zoning Designation TC (Tourist Commercial) Previous City Council Review The City Council considered EA 2006-573 and SDP 2006-865, at its meeting of February 20, 2007 (Attachment 2). It was at this hearing that the need for the CUP was discussed and the City Council directed staff to process a CUP in conjunction with the SDP. After a Motion to approve the EA and SDP failed to pass on a 3-2 vote, the City Council passed a Minute Motion to continue EA 2006-573 and SDP 2006-865 to this meeting to allow a CUP to be filed by the applicant and reviewed by the Planning Commission. The SDP application was not referred back to the Planning Commission and was not subject to additional Planning Commission review. At that hearing, the City Council asked that the applicants meet with the surrounding Homeowners Associations (HOA) to discuss acquisition of the Tennis Villas or mitigation of their objections. City staff attended a meeting between the four HOA's on March 1, 2007. The purpose of the meeting was to provide a forum for the HOA's directors to meet with Resort representatives to ask questions and discuss the proposal, site design and overall operation of the proposed Signature Pool. The meeting was informational and very candid and direct with regards to topics discussed. The Resort did not make any formal commitments to re -design or change the operation of the proposal. Both sides discussed a range of considerations that have been discussed at public hearings. The applicants and Homeowners Associations representatives have held subsequent meeting(s) to discuss the CUP and SDP. Staff was not invited to those meetings. General The subject property is on the grounds of the La Quinta Resort and Club which opened in 1926 and is located on the west side of Eisenhower Drive, south of Avenida Fernando. The site proposed for the "Signature Pool" facility is on the west side of Avenida Obregon, south of Avenida Fernando, private streets within the 62 acre resort (Attachment 3). The La Quinta Resort and Club (originally the La Quinta Hotel) opened in 1926 with 20 casitas, a lobby area and one restaurant. Over the years it has been expanded and modified to include 62 acres and over 800 rooms. Relevant Resort development modifications and additions over the years have included: 1926 Opened on December 26, 1926 1927 Installed nine -hole golf course, the second course built in the Coachella Valley 000280 1937 Added the first swimming pool to the Resort 1940's Constructed the Tennis Club offering 30 courts with a choice of hard, grass and clay surfaces (presently there are 23 tennis courts) 1980 Constructed two 18-hole golf courses 1984 Between 1980 and 1984, constructed 193 casitas and suites with swimming pools, the original Signature Pool (now replaced with sunken center tennis court), the Frank Capra Ballroom and two suites 1987 Constructed its third 18-hole golf course 1988 Constructed 371 casitas and a number of swimming pools, the retail area (The Plaza), and two restaurants (Morgan's and Adobe Grill) 1994 Constructed the Flores Ballroom 1998 Constructed the 23,000 square foot Spa La Quinta and Spa Villas bringing the guestroom total to a little over 800 guestrooms The original Specific Plan for the La Quinta Resort was approved by the County of Riverside in 1975. Prior to 1982 when the City incorporated, development of the Resort was governed by the County of Riverside regulations. The 4.7 ± acre site of the proposed water feature presently is developed with resort recreational facilities, including ten tennis courts (of the total 23 courts), the main Resort swimming pool, landscaped grounds, a children's playground, the Morgan House, and several other buildings. Landscaping consists of a large number of mature Palm and Olive trees. Nine tennis courts, the tennis stadium (center court), a restroom building, the main outdoor swimming pool and playground area will all be removed to facilitate the new water feature. Two of the three retained buildings will be used as part of the proposed pool facility. The remaining Morgan House which has been closed to Resort and public use for approximately one year due to seismic safety concerns will be retained "as is" with a safety fence installed around it. Proposed Modifications to the Resort's Recreational Amenities: General The proposal is to construct a Signature Pool" water feature on the 4.7 ± acre site, fronting on Avenida Obregon, a private 20 foot wide street. The proposal would include several water -related and pool amenities. Proposed amenities include two artificial rock formations, one of which will contain three enclosed slides leading to a splashdown pool and a wave pool, a lazy river that proceeds in a circular loop, a formal outdoor pool with terraces, private pool -side cabanas, an arrival plaza building, children's outdoor play area and pool, a game room with first aid center, indoor and outdoor dining areas, and chaise lounge deck areas. A description of the project which includes a background on the Resort has been submitted by the applicant (Attachment 4). 000281 Site Development Permit Request A complete description of the design features of the project is contained in the February 20, 2007 City Council report on EA 2006-573 and SDP 2006-865 (Attachment 5). The site and landscape design as proposed by the applicants has not changed since the last City Council review (Attachment 6). Some aspects of the proposed operation of the facility have changed since the last review and are described below as part of the CUP request. Conditional Use Permit Request The La Quinta Resort is required to comply with all applicable development regulations including the provisions and standards set forth in the current La Quinta Resort Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment #5. Adopted in 2001, Amendment #5 of the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan identifies permitted and conditional land uses. The Specific Plan does have a provision which states "pool/spa and water park uses" and "theaters, live or motion picture -indoor or out" require a CUP. Therefore, the proposed signature pool facility must obtain a Conditional Use Permit in addition to a Site Development Permit. A Conditional Use Permit application was not initially processed with EA 2006-573 (EA) and SDP 2006-865 (SDP) that the Commission considered on February 13, 2007. At that hearing the Commission took action to recommend approval of EA 2006-573 (on a 4-0 vote) and sent the SDP to City Council without recommendation because their motion to approve the SDP resulted in a tie vote. The Planning Commission did recommend approval of the Addendum and the CUP is consistent with the information considered in reviewing the SDP. The City Council is to address this CUP concurrently with the EA and SDP applications. Staff has prepared one Resolution for the Addendum, CUP and SDP. The purpose of a CUP is to provide for individual approval, conditional approval, or denial of proposed land uses and operational conditions of approval. Uses requiring these permits have potential for adverse impacts to surrounding properties and/or residents. Therefore, when such uses are approved, conditions are placed on their establishment and operation to adjust the proposal to reduce or eliminate any effects on adjacent properties and neighborhoods. If the City Council approves this CUP, the action should include requirements that ensure it is established and operated in a manner that will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. The City Council has the discretion to consider the appropriateness of the proposed CUP, proposed conditions, and any other recommendations that it determines to be appropriate. As part of the CUP application material, the applicant has prepared an application booklet (Attachment 7). In addition to a project exhibits, the application includes a project narrative, which identifies commitments being made by the Resort to address 000282 O 2 8? potential impacts relevant to parking, traffic control, construction management, road and access improvements and security. See pages one to four for a description of the application's proposed operational criteria for the CUP. Many of these commitments come from the operational conditions of the SDP. All recommended operational related Conditions of Approval from the SDP have been transferred by staff to this CUP. The Planning Commission approved additional measures which, in the opinion of the Commission, added additional assurances that the project will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties and neighborhood. Information provided in the application booklet identifies that the applicant has stated they will not show evening movies and not open the water slides, wave pool and lazy river from January 1 to March 15 of each year. As part of the Planning Commission action on March 13, 2007, the Planning Commission, with the applicant's concurrence, changed this time period to the Monday following Thanksgiving to the 2nd Thursday of March. The applicant states open areas of the project site, such as the decks and open landscaped areas will continue to be used for special events such as receptions, dinners, and meetings in conjunction with conference guests. Provisions for showing movies have been provided on the side of the rock formation facing the wave pool. As noted, the applicant has agreed to not showing movies from the Monday following Thanksgiving to the 2nd Thursday of March (previously proposed to be January 1 to March 15 of each year). The applicant has also stated in their CUP application that after one year of operation they will review the previous year's security effectiveness to determine if any improvements should be made to the Resorts use of the pool facilities related to hours of operation. The CUP application also identifies that new safety and security employees will be retained to specifically help with traffic control, noise and general security of the Signature Pool and the surrounding areas. The applicant states they will temporarily shut down operation of any active water features (wave pool, slides and lazy river) if the City notifies them that the City's Noise Ordinance maximums are exceeded or a public nuisance exists as a result of the facility's operation. The Commission expanded this restriction so it addresses all activities within the boundaries of the CUP. The applicant will then take whatever steps necessary to correct the problem before re -starting that facility or activity. Issues/Analysis on Conditional Use Permit 2007-102: As previously stated, the purpose of a CUP is to provide for individual approval, conditional approval, or denial of proposed land uses and operational conditions. Conditions of Approval are typically imposed to specifically address potential adverse impacts to surrounding properties and/or residents. Thus, operational management/control is established with a CUP versus conditions specific site flOO283 improvements, which are typically found with Site Development Permits. Conditions of Approval for a CUP can include time sensitive criteria, operational criteria and consequences for failure to comply. Additionally, a Conditional Use Permit can be revoked should there be violations to the conditions set forth. Any consideration for revocation must be conducted in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.130. Multiple issues have been identified as part of the analysis of the proposed CUP application. The following categories provide analysis of the major identified issues: Parkin No additional parking facilities are proposed to be provided for this use to offset the lost of the nine spaces on Avenida Obregon. The applicant states there will not be an increased parking demand that will exceed the existing parking capacity because the pool feature is geared to increasing the Resorts occupancy during the 48% off-season summer month occupancy when parking spaces are readily available. Subsequent to the Planning Commission hearing, the Resort prepared a Traffic Volume and Parking Conditions Study dated February 12, 2007 (Attachment 6). This study showed that on February 9, 2007, the Resort had adequate parking available and the on -site private streets operated at an acceptable level of service. Also, based on their research relating to Resort facility usage, the applicant states Citrus Club members who potentially could use the proposed water feature, primarily use the Resort for golf and fitness and make very minimal use of the existing pools. Lastly, less than 20% of these members have qualified children who could potentially use the pool feature (Attachment 8). The Planning Commission recommends that if the City determines insufficient parking exists, or that the Parking Management Program is not working, and/or that traffic flow is not operating adequately, up to three parking management studies over three years shall be completed to determine how to resolve any parking issues. Any improvements recommended by these studies are required to be implemented within one year of their requirement. The applicant has incorporated into the CUP packet language consistent with the previously recommended SDP conditions. The Date Palm grove at the northwest corner of Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando presently is used for conference related activities on occasion. It is recommended that this grove be reserved for at least three years for future parking or loading and unloading if deemed necessary by the City. A Parking Management Program is recommended to require parking permits and identify provisions for ticketing and/or towing of violators during high demand in - season periods. The Resort presently operates an on -site shuttle service throughout the Resort that will continue when the project is operational. A Condition of Approval is recommerXf" f+ requiring the shuttle service be extended to serve the water feature. This should minimize demand for parking in the signature pool area. The CUP booklet also identifies the addition of Resort staff to assist with parking management and the establishment of a parking/traffic hotline". These efforts will help with directing Resort and club guests to the appropriate parking areas and should also help minimize any excessive demand for parking near the Signature Pool entrance. Another important component to addressing parking is signage. Improvements to the Resorts sign program that direct Resort and club guests to the appropriate parking areas would also assist with minimizing the demand for parking near the signature pool entrance. Refer to proposed Condition Nos. 6-15 for parking and other operational control measures. Traffic/Circulation As a part of the Avenida Obregon entry median area south of Avenida Fernando, staff recommended during the SDP application process the Community Development Director has the right to require the gates be installed and operated during periods of increased parking demand due to high water feature attendance. The applicant has proposed similar language in the CUP application. Once the gates are required to be used and until the gates are installed, the Resort will provide a person to man the entry and control traffic allowed to enter the area. During operation of the gates or when it is manned, this entry area will also become the drop-off turnaround for water feature users. Avenida Obregon is a 20 foot wide private street (curb to curb) that does not allow parallel parking on either side. It is red curbed and signed as a fire lane. There have been times when guests, employees, and service vehicles have parallel and double parked along the street violating the fire lane parking restriction as well as making use of the street difficult. The City's Code Compliance Department has in the past, received complaints regarding parking on the street. As a result, monitoring of the area has resulted in the issuance of five citations in the last 11 months. Regular monitoring of the street for parking violations is done by the City's Code Compliance Department. The gate operation requirement noted above will help to alleviate this problem. In addition, the previously noted "parking/traffic hotline" will provide opportunity for direct contact to and quick response from the Resort "traffic control officer" for any reported concerns. Noise As a part of the Addendum, an acoustical analysis of mechanical equipment use and expected operational conditions was prepared (Attachment 1)• In summary, the findings of the study show that the proposed project will operate in compliance with City noise standards. Furthermore, the amount of noise increase over existing noise levels near the proposed Signature Pool project will not be significant. 00(�"j As previously noted, the applicant has proposed with this CUP application a condition specific to addressing noise abatement. The applicant references the City's Municipal Code Section 9.100.210(c) as the governing standard to identify any potential violations. In addition to this provision La Quinta Municipal Code Section 1 1.08.040 is recommended to be included, which provides the ability to address noise related to specific nuisance occurrences which may not necessarily exceed noise limits but do impact the neighbors quality of life. Recorded and possibly live music, is proposed to be played through a ground -mounted speaker system throughout the facility. This can be expected to be played during hours the facility is opened. In order to not impact the adjacent residential owners, Limited live music or amplified entertainment, broadcasting is recommended to be allowed in the lazy river, slide, wave pool areas and children's area. Movies will be played in evening hours on limited occasions. Showing of these movies could impact the adjacent residential owners, and therefore, it is recommended that they not be shown from the Monday following Thanksgiving and the 2nd Thursday of March of each year and end no later than 10 p.m. Most of the private residential Tennis Villas units adjacent to the site have small outdoor patios adjacent to the water feature's property line. Presently there are chain link tennis fences (with green mesh cloth) adjacent to block retaining walls at the tennis court/Tennis Villas boundary. Most of the area between the fencing and retaining walls is planted with citrus trees that help provide a visual screen between the uses. With this water feature, depending on where the property line is, the fences and possibly the trees ,will be removed. Staff is recommending the Resort be required to work with Tennis Villas homeowners immediately adjacent to the Signature Pool to construct a five to six foot garden wall or enclosure to create an outdoor patio within the turf areas located between the Signature Pool property line and the Tennis Villas. If a homeowner chooses not to have this wall constructed, the Resort may construct a six foot high screen wall on its northerly or southerly property line. See Condition No. 34 of the CUP for additional details. In addition, the applicant will be required to design and construct property line walls in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.60.030, which requires a stepped wall design for any walls over 8-feet in height. Construction Parking The applicant has included in the CUP booklet conditions specific to the construction parking. These conditions are generally consistent with staff's recommended conditions identified during the SDP application process. These conditions, along with staff's recommended modifications, should minimize the impact of construction vehicles upon the existing private streets and prevent large construction vehicles from parking adjacent to residential properties. 0 ��tt Operations An issue raised has been the number of patrons using the facility at any one time. Opponents stated up to 3,000+ persons could use the facility at one time. It is recommended the maximum number of water feature patrons shall not exceed 1,950 at any one time. Furthermore, outdoor meetings, dinners, receptions, etc. held within the water feature area shall not exceed 1,500 persons and shall end no later than 10 p.m. No amplified music shall be permitted within the active pool area from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. during the period between the Monday following Thanksgiving and the 2nd Thursday of March. Site Design In order to reduce nuisance impacts to adjacent residential properties, the lazy river shall have no guest access to the lazy river (emergency access is permitted) in the area between the lazy river and north property line. Issues/Analvsis on Site Development Permit 2006-865: Some of the CUP'S operational issues apply to the SDP that deals with the design of the project. Those issues include parking, traffic, and noise and are discussed above. The Morgan House is located within the area near the northeast corner of the site. As noted above, the house will remain in place but be fenced off in order to protect both the public and Resort employees from a seismic induced collapse. The setback of the fencing from the house will be determined by the type of fencing. An open decorative fence will require a slightly bigger setback while a solid engineered fence will allow the fence to be closer to the building. Staff has recommended Condition of Approval No. 81 requiring an attractive safety/security fence be installed as a temporary measure (until the structures seismic instability is corrected or it is demolished) with the design and location submitted to the Community Development and Building and Safety Directors for approval. Additionally, a historic resources monitor or structural engineer is recommended to be on -site whenever demolition or construction vibration or noise is occurring within 100 feet of the building to ensure its safety (Condition Nos. 74-76 of the SDP). With regard to the safety fencing location, the applicant has submitted an engineering report prepared by an adobe specialist with recommendations on where fencing should be placed to ensure that a collapse of the building will not endanger nearby persons. The fence location varies depending on whether the fence is structurally engineered and constructed of a solid material or not. In either case, the location of the safety fence will easily fit within the site plan of the applicant's proposal. As noted above, the historic context of the Morgan House on the Resort grounds will not be degraded beyond that which presently exists. When the house was originally constructed, the area surrounding it was to a great extent undeveloped. Over 460287 years, development of the Resort and surrounding residential development has encroached upon the house. The house is essentially surrounded by fences and walls that either keep persons in nearby areas there or away from the house. Therefore, the installation of these safety fences will not affect the historic context of the house and its surroundings. The area proposed for the Signature Pool is presently used almost exclusively for Resort recreation and with the installation of the proposed water features, the area will continue to be used for that purpose. In order to provide fire protection access to the two artificial rock structures on the west side of the site, the Fire Department is recommending as a condition of approval that a fire truck gate and access to the west side of the site be provided on Calle Mazatlan where the tennis court is adjacent to the street (Condition No. 105). The gates will allow Fire Department vehicles and personnel access to the artificial rock structures from the west. This would require a 20 foot wide portion of the existing fences between the three courts be removed or hinged. The net for the fourth court (No. 12) adjacent to the water feature will need to be removed to provide a fire vehicle turnaround, unless an alternative (i.e. removable net poles, access through adjacent Villa Drive, etc.) is agreed upon by the Fire Department. The fire access from Avenida Obregon that exists will remain. Planning Commission Action on Environmental Assessment 2006-573 and Site Development Permit 2006-865 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to consider the Environmental Assessment and Site Development Permit at its meeting of February 13, 2007 (Attachment 9). The applicant's presentation included a brief history of the Resort and its development as well as a description of the proposed Signature Pool facility. The applicant noted that they have approximately 1,600 employees. With the increased summer and shoulder month's occupancy, they predict the new facilities will help retain those employees during the Resort's traditionally slow period. Also, they noted the facilities will allow them to compete with other regional resorts that now have or will soon have these types of amenities. They noted that they made numerous changes to their design to address concerns they had previously heard from surrounding property owners, such as: enclosing all of the water slides; lowering the grades; lowering the water surface in the lazy river and the splash pool to help retain sound; and reducing the height of the rock formations. During that hearing, approximately 33 people spoke, nearly all in opposition to the request. The speakers and the letters noted concerns such as: increased traffic in an area that is already at times congested; noise from the water feature users; construction noise and inconveniences; blocking of views by the taller rock formation; loss of tennis facilities; and loss of the Resort's charm. 000288 The adjoining Homeowners' Associations have hired the law firm of Guralnick & Gilliland, LLP who has prepared a letter in opposition to the proposal. This letter also includes technical reports addressing traffic, parking and noise (Attachment 10). In response to this letter and reports, the City's traffic and noise consultants have submitted written responses (Attachment 11). The City Attorney has noted that the Guralnick letter is based upon the erroneous assumption that the City is proposing to adopt a Negative Declaration in connection with this application. This is incorrect. The environmental documentation which has been prepared for this proposal is an "Addendum." This was prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline 15164. The Addendum builds on the analysis completed in EIR No. 41 and the subsequent environmental documents. This is appropriate because what is proposed is a modification to a 4.7- acre portion of an existing 62-acre project (the La Quinta Resort), which project has already undergone extensive and voluminous environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. The question isn't whether or not there will be any impacts from the Signature Pool facilities. Instead, the question is whether the replacement of Resort amenities proposed in these applications will cause significant impacts beyond those previously outlined in the extensive prior environmental review. The Addendum concludes that with the proposed modifications to the Signature Pool area, the Resort as a whole will have not greater impacts than what has already been identified and accepted. In this regard, it is important to note that the proposal involves no increase in the number of rooms available for rent. Instead, its purpose is to have more efficient usage of the existing capacity of the Resort. The Planning Commission, during the EA and SDP review with Commissioner Daniels absent, discussed the various issues brought up as well as their ideas and concerns. In addition to neighborhood concerns, items discussed by one or more of the Commissioners included: whether the Signature Pool facilities were too intense for the location; how the facility would be operated; the Resort's right to evolve and make changes; impacts on the surrounding property owners; and possible additional Conditions of Approval, including improvements to the berm along Eisenhower Drive and the existing pathway. The Planning Commission on a 4-0 vote adopted Resolution 2007-007 recommending certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents for Environmental Assessment 2006-573. Then, Commissioner Quill motioned to approve Site Development Permit 2006-865 with Commissioner Engel seconding the motion. The motion failed to pass on a 2-2 vote with Commissioners Alderson and Barrows casting negative votes. The Commission was informed by the City Attorney that City's policy is when there is a tie vote and a commissioner is absent, the item is normally continued to the next meeting so that the absent commissioner can break the tie vote. However, the policy allows the Commission to provide a different disposition if they can do so in a successful motion. Because the Commission action on the SDP was simply a recommendation to the Council, the Commission adopted a motion 4-0 directing that the request be sent to the City Council noting their action and the Conditions of Approval that had been suggested by Commission Chair Quill. Specifically, they requested the following additional Conditions of Approval be considered by the City Council if it is determined that the SDP be approved: 1. That a comprehensive landscaping, irrigation and fencing plan to resolve problems and improve the appearance be prepared for the Eisenhower Drive frontage and southern perimeter adjacent to the Bear Creek Bike Path for review and approval by the Community Development Director. The plan shall be implemented and completed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Signature Pool facility. 2. That a security operations plan be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval prior to issuance of first building permit. The plans should include items such as security in the pool facility and Avenida Obregon areas during operation and after hours, control of guests in residential areas, etc. 3. That trees on the rock formations shall be limited to small trees that do not obstruct views and are compatible with the local mountain habitat. Planning Commission Action on Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to consider the Conditional Use Permit at its meeting of March 13, 2007 (Attachment 12). During his presentation, the applicant noted they had met with representatives of the major Homeowners Associations surrounding the Resort. They noted the changes they had agreed to, based on this meeting and City staff discussions. Mr. Bill Markenson, Loss Prevention Manager for the Resort noted they had already implemented many of their proposed traffic and parking control plans during recent practice tennis events and noted that they worked well, avoiding traffic and circulation problems in the Signature Pool area. One Resort representative spoke in favor of the project and asked a number of La Quinta residents who are Resort employees to stand in the audience. Additionally, she noted improvements were being done at PGA West and the Citrus to provide fitness and tennis facilities there, thus reducing potential trips to the tennis and fitness facilities at the Resort. A number of residents from the area spoke in opposition to the proposed request. They cited concerns similar to those raised at the previous public hearing, such as noise, traffic, ambiance, tennis facility reductions, quality of life reduction, and construction noise. Attorney Wayne Guralnick, speaking on behalf of Los Estados, Mountain Estates, Tennis Villas and The Enclave homeowner associations stated that one of the required Findings for a CUP was that the use was compatible with and not injurious to 1000280 surrounding properties. He testified that in his opinion the required Findings were not made by staff. He recommended denial of the request or that the Conditions of Approval be carefully considered if the project is approved. He noted that the use of the area by the Resort for dinners, meetings, etc. would create conditions that would be incompatible with the adjacent properties. He requested that the closing times for ancillary outdoor activities and the restaurant be cutback and that no dinners, meetings, etc. be held in the active water feature area (open areas near the wave and slide pools and lazy river). He requested that movies only be allowed in the formal pool area. Mr. Guralnick felt determination and enforcement of noise violations would be difficult if not impossible. Mr. Rick Zeilenga, Attorney for the applicant spoke in rebuttal, noted that many of the concerned residents were three football fields away. He noted the noise study for the Addendum was very conservative in its assumption. Therefore, he noted noise levels could be arguably lower than stated in the report. He noted that their concessions in operating hours, days and activities during prime season assure that the use would not detrimental to the closest Tennis Villas residents. Mr. Zeilenga noted that traffic studies completed by Endo Engineering indicate that traffic and parking is operating at a fraction of its capacity and summer traffic would not exceed prime winter parking. It was noted pedestrian safety measures would improve with approval of the project. He briefly discussed other measures proposed to improve traffic and circulation. He explained the benefits the project would generate for the City, community as well as the Resort if the project is approved. The Planning Commission discussed the merits of the project and noted that the applicants had presented an operational program that addressed their concerns and provided that future issues could be resolved to ensure the project would be acceptable. The Commission did add to their SDP condition during their previous review to have the perimeter landscaping upgraded along Eisenhower Drive, south of Avenue 50, along the Bear Creek Trail on the south property line and along Avenida Carranza to their maintenance facility. On a Motion by Commissioner Daniels, seconded by Commissioner Engle, the Planning Commission on a 5-0 vote adopted Resolution 2007-011, subject to revised Conditions of Approval. Response to Mr. Fredricks: The Mayor and City Council have received a letter from Mr. Richard R. Fredricks' attorney (Demetrious, Del Guerio, Springer & Francis, LLP) regarding the proposed CUP and SDP. The letter (Attachment 13) references a number of concerns regarding the legal and physical condition of Avenida Obergon. The City does not dispute the fact that Avenida Obergon provides access between Avenida Fernando and the Fredricks' estate. This condition has existed for many years and the physical improvement of Avenida Obergon has been modified over the years. The proposed SDP and the recommended Conditions of Approval for the CUP have been carefully revised by the City to ensure that the current conditions are upgraded as follows: 000230 1. A new entry area with turnaround at Avenida Obergon and Avenida Fernando will be provided. 2. Relocation of parking in front of Spa La Quinta with a new drop-off area at the Spa provided. 3. Installation of decorative crosswalks on Avenida Obregon. 4. The City can require up to three parking studies with improvements if problems arise after the facility opens. 5. A Parking Management Program will be required to monitor parking and assure on -street restrictions are enforced. 6. Shuttle service will assure guests do not need to drive to the facility from other parts of the Resort. 7. New Resort parking and traffic employees will be hired specifically to monitor parking and traffic conditions in the water feature and adjacent roadway areas and resolve problems as they arise. 8. Should the gates at Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando be used, all property owners of private property that take access from Avenida Obregon will continue to have access at no cost to them. 9. A parking/traffic hotline will be implemented by the Resort with immediate response required. Based upon the physical and management improvements to be implemented with this project, City staff believes that the access along Avenida Obergon will be improved. and not degraded. Response to Mr. Mittelbusher: Staff has received an inquiry (Attachment 14) from Mr. Ed Mittelbusher, a resident on Calle Mazatlan, near the proposed Signature Pool asking the following questions: 1. Could the temporary increases in noise during demolition, excavation, grading and construction of the new pools and related site improvements be as long as eight hours per day for weeks at a time? 2. What are the measures that would reduce the potentially significant impacts to the level of less than significant? A response has been prepared specifically answering his questions based on the construction schedule for the project (Attachment 15). In summary, noise levels would vary from phase to phase, and from day to day, depending on where equipment is in use. Because of the relatively short-term to moderate duration of individual construction activities at any single location, and the City's existing restrictions on periods when construction must occur, as well as the incorporation of routine construction noise controls, potential noise impacts from construction in the surrounding residential area are considered less than significant. Specific measures as noted in the response could reduce construction noise levels. These five measures are as follows and are recommended as conditions of approval to the SDP: 000291 1. The following construction noise attenuation measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Directors of Building and Safety and Community Development: A. Stationary equipment shall be staged away from the surrounding residential units and temporary noise barriers or enclosures shall be utilized around staging areas. B. Quiet equipment such as air compressors, concrete pumps and generators, etc. shall be used by the construction contractor. C. Temporary noise barriers shall be used at specified locations either around specific construction activities and/or at the perimeter of the construction site to reduce localized noise impact to adjacent residential units. D. Construction activity scheduling shall be utilized to limit higher noise level operations to the middle of the day when ambient noise levels are typically at their highest levels to mask the construction activity noise levels, thereby reducing the perceived impact. E. The construction contractor shall submit a noise control plan to the Building and Safety and Community Development Directors for approval, to be implemented as part of the construction project and process that will minimize the level and time of construction activities. It should be noted that construction activities are exempt from compliance with the City Noise Ordinance requirements but due to concerns of surrounding residents the above noted Conditions are recommended. Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC): The ALRC reviewed this request at its meeting of December 6, 2006, and on a 3-0 vote recommended approval of the request with conditions recommended by staff (Attachment 16). Historic Preservation Commission (HPC): On January 18, 2007, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the provisions proposed to retain the Walter Morgan House at the Resort as part of their proposed water feature. The HPC requested the following additional information be submitted: 1. Retrofit costs to make the house safe to occupy. 2. Future plans for the house at this time. 3. Plan for maintaining the house if not retrofitted. 4. Discussion of how the building could be used as part of the Resort. 000292 This information is required to be submitted and approved by the HPC prior to any alterations to the Morgan House other than demolition of the adjacent detached modern -era outbuilding. Public Notice: This application was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on March 2, 2007. All property owners in and within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the Public Hearing notice as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code. Other persons sent notices included those who sent the City letters or a -mails prior to the publishing of the hearing notice. As of this writing, a number of new letters have been received and are attached for your review (Attachment 17). The negative correspondence to date has cited issues such as increased traffic and noise, parking problems, loss of views, loss of the Resort's original ambiance and construction. Relocating the use to an alternate site on the Resort grounds such as the Renker pool area has been suggested. Mandatory Findings for the Conditional Use Permit: The Findings as required by Section 9.210.020 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Zoning Code can be made as noted below. 1. Compliance with the General Plan - The project site within the La Quinta Resort is designated by the General Plan and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5 as Tourist Commercial. This Tourist Commercial designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Furthermore, the project site has been used for various Resort related recreational uses, including a previous "Signature Pool" where the sunken tennis courts presently exist. Therefore, the project is in compliance with the General Plan and Specific Plan. 2. Compliance with the Zoning Code - The City Zoning Map and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5 designates the zoning of the project site within the La Quinta Resort as Tourist Commercial. This designation permits the resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Applicable development standards are complied with based on the proposed plans, operation and recommended Conditions of Approval. No structures proposed exceed the 40 feet height limit nor are they setback less than the required 15 feet from residentially zoned properties. 3. Compliance with CEQA - The La Quinta Community Development Department has caused to be prepared Environmental Assessment 2006-573 (an Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Number 41 and to a series of subsequently approved environmental review documents) for this Site Development Permit in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended. 000293 The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed modifications to the La Quinta Resort do not require a subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration, since the circumstances described in Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines do no exist, in that there will be no new or more significant impacts than those disclosed in the prior EIR Number 41 and the CEQA compliance documents approved subsequently. The modifications proposed and the circumstances under which the modifications would be carried out do not require substantial changes to the previous EIR, or the Subsequent Environmental documents, due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there is no new information of substantial importance which would trigger the requirement of a subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with Section 15162(a)(3)• Therefore, upon certification of Environmental Assessment 2006-573 the project is in compliance with CEQA requirements. 4. Surrounding Uses - The recommended Conditions of Approval and site design of the project ensure that the Water Feature will operate in a manner that will minimize the impacts to the adjacent residential uses. Furthermore, the Conditions of Approval require problems or issues to be reviewed and resolved. The property to the south consists of Spa La Quinta, tennis courts and several Tennis Villas, only one of which abuts the subject property. To the north are a number of Tennis Villas. These Villas are privately owned properties and some are rented out as part of the Resort. The project as proposed will incorporate measures to provide compatibility with the surrounding residential uses, such as sound attenuation through walls, lowering finish grades, extensive planting, parking controls, construction restrictions, etc. As noted in the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Addendum, and which have been specifically incorporated by reference herein, the Proposed Modification is not incompatible with or injurious to the surrounding community. Mandatory Findings for Site Development Permit: The Findings as required by Section 9.210.010 (Site Development Permits) of the Zoning Code can be made as noted below. 1. Compliance with the General Plan - The SDP site within the La Quinta Resort is designated by the General Plan and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5 as Tourist Commercial which includes recreational uses. This designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Furthermore, the 4.7-acre site has been used for various resort -related recreational uses, including a previous "Signature Pool" where the sunken tennis courts presently exist. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance 000294 with the General Plan and Specific Plan. 2. Compliance with the Zoning Code - The City Zoning Map and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment No. 5 zone the 4.7 acre site within the La Quinta Resort as Tourist Commercial. This designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Applicable development standards are complied with based on the proposed plans and recommended Conditions of Approval. 3. Compliance with CEO.A - The La Quinta Community Development Department has caused to be prepared Environmental Assessment 2006-573 (an Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Number 41 and to a series of subsequently approved environmental review documents) for this Site Development Permit in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended. The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed modifications to the La Quinta Resort do not require a subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration, since the circumstances described in Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines do not exist, as there will be no new or more significant impacts than those disclosed in the prior EIR No. 41 and the CEQA compliance documents approved subsequently. The modifications proposed, and the circumstances under which the modifications would be carried out, do not require substantial changes to the previous EIR, or the Subsequent Environmental documents, due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there is no new information of substantial importance which would trigger the requirement of a subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, upon certification of Environmental assessment 2006-573, the proposal will be in compliance with CEQA requirements. 4. Architectural Design - The architectural design of the proposed facilities, including, but not limited to the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements, are compatible with other plans approved for construction on the Resort grounds and other surrounding development in the City. 5. Site Design - The site design of the facilities, including, but not limited to entries, interior circulation, pedestrian amenities, and other site design elements have been established by the previous development of the 4.7-acre area on the Resort grounds. The center tennis court area has been used for a pool in the past and, with this project, will be again used for that purpose. The proposed facilities will be compatible with surrounding hotel development and with the � quality of design prevalent in the City. 6. Landscape Design - The proposed landscaping includes, but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials is designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, and provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses. It will provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the facilities, complement the surrounding area and comply with City and CVWD water efficiency requirements, ensuring efficient water use. 7. Sign Programs - A comprehensive sign program, including on -site facility and Resort directional signage is required upon approval of this proposal prior to issuance of the first building permit. Resort area directional signage will include shuttle routes and stops. Conclusion: The Resort has grown and continuously evolved over the years. It began with 20 casitas' and one restaurant. Over the years it has been expanded and been modified to include 62 acres and over 800 rooms, along with extensive recreational activities including golf, tennis, fitness, biking, and water activities. The Signature Pool proposal is an evolution of the recreational activities at the resort. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The Mandatory Findings for approval can be made as noted above and in the attached Resolution. The alternatives available to the Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent CEQA compliance documents and approving Conditional Use Permit 2007-102, and Site Development Permit 2006-865, subject to the Conditions of Approval; or 2. Deny the request; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. iRessubmtte Y snDouCommunity Development Director Attachments Approved for submission by: __X ZV-<-" Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1. Addendum (EA 2006-573) - Errata to Addendum attached (Council attachment only — copies for review are available in the City Clerk's office) 2. City Council minutes for the meeting of February 20, 2007 3. Location map 4. Signature Pool description 5. February 20, 2007 City Council report (without attachments) for EA 2006-573 and SDP 2006-865 6. Plan exhibit booklet for SDP 2006-865 7. Plan exhibit booklet for CUP 2007-102 8. Letter from Paul J. McCormick dated January 11, 2007 9. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of February 13, 2007 10. Letter from Guralnick & Gilliland, LLP dated February 12, 2007 11. Noise and Traffic Consultant's response letters 12. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of March 13, 2007 13. Letter from Demetrious, Del Guerio, Springer & Francis, LLP on behalf of Mr. Richard R. Fredricks 14. E-mail from Mr. Ed Mittelbusher 15. Response to Mr. Mittelbusher's inquiry 16. ALRC minutes for the meeting of December 6, 2007 17. Letters received from public 000287 tit •: RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, (1) CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR NO. 41), AND SUBSEQUENT CEQA COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS, FOR LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB REVISED SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E (1975), PREPARED FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865 AND; (2) APPROVING OPERATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A SIGNATURE POOL FACILITY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA OBREGON, ON THE LA QUINTA RESORT GROUNDS CASE NOS.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2006-573 [ADDENDUM] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865 APPLICANT: CNL DESERT RESORT, LLP WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 13th day of February, 2007, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of CNL Desert Resort, LLP ("CNL") regarding an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for Revised Specific Plan 121-E, as revised and amended, (EIR No. 41) (the "Addendum") and Site Development Permit No. 2006-865 (the "SDP"); WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after thoroughly considering the Addendum, EIR No. 41, the subsequent CEQA compliance documents, the staff report and presentation, the presentation by Impact Science regarding the Addendum, the presentation by the Applicant, the public testimony and written submissions, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-007, wherein it recommended by a vote of all Planning Commissioners present that the City Council adopt a Resolution certifying the Addendum; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted by minute action to submit the SDP to the City Council for action, and to report the vote taken was a failed motion (which resulted from a tie vote) to approve SDP with added conditions of approval, which vote and added conditions are further outlined in the staff report to the City Council for the February 20, 2007 public hearing and March 20, 2007 continued public hearing; WHEREAS, the City Council did, on the 20th day of February, 2007, hold a duly -noticed public hearing to consider the request of CNL regarding the Addendum and the SDP, which contemplates the modification of approximately 4.7 p\reports-cc\2007\3-20-07\sdp 2006-865 cnl\ea cup sdp cc res.doc 000299 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 acres within the La Quinta Resort's 62-acre site, and the construction of a "Signature Pool" complex on that 4.7 acre parcel; WHEREAS, the City Council did, on the 20th day of February, 2007, continue the duly -noticed public hearing for the EA and SDP to the meeting of March 20, 2007; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 13th day of March, 2007, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of CNL Desert Resort, LLP ("CNL") regarding Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 (the "CUP"); WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after thoroughly considering the CUP, the staff report and presentation, the presentation by the Applicant, the public testimony and written submissions, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007- 011 subject to conditions of approval, wherein it recommended by a unanimous vote of all Planning Commissioners present that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the CUP; WHEREAS, the Community Development Department, Planning Commission and the City Council have each determined that the Addendum complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended, Resolution 83-68 adopted by the City Council); and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering the EIR No. 41, the subsequent CEQA compliance documents, the Addendum and all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certifying the Addendum: 1. The current applications for the SDP (the "Application" or "Proposed Modification"), with respect to a portion of Revised Specific Plan 121-E, as amended, constitute further discretionary approvals needed to implement the Revised Specific Plan, as amended. The Application reflects necessary entitlements to proceed with the redevelopment of approximately 4.7 acres, located within the La Quinta Resort's 62-acre site; both of which are situated within the Revised Specific Plan 121-E, as amended. Specifically, the "Signature Pool" contemplated by the Proposed Modification will provide several water -related and pool -featured amenities, including an arrival plaza; a 00030fl City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 children's outdoor play area; a "lazy river" that proceeds in a circular loop; a formal outdoor pool with terraces; private pool -side cabanas; a game room with a first aid center; outdoor dining terraces; a splashdown pool for slides; a wave pool; a chaise lounge deck; and secure gate entry points. The Proposed Modification will be limited to a specific portion of the La Quinta Resort's 62- acre property, which presently contains existing recreational facilities, including an outdoor swimming pool and tennis courts. Specifically, the area to be affected by the Proposed Modification presently contains up to ten existing tennis courts, the existing tennis stadium (center court), an existing restroom building and an existing outdoor swimming pool. The Proposed Modification will not be open to the general public and is not intended to function as a theme park or public water park. Additionally, the Proposed Modification site is situated such that it is not visible to the general public or from any adjacent public roadways. 2. On or about May 6, 1975, the Board of Supervisors for the County of Riverside certified the adequacy and completeness of EIR No. 41 and approved and adopted Specific Plan 121-E. In October of 1982, the City Council certified Environmental Assessment No. 15145 and a Negative Declaration in connection with its consideration and approval of the Revised Specific Plan 121-E to reflect modifications to Specific Plan 121-E, refinements of the development concepts therein and a change of zone. On or about September 20, 1988, the City Council certified Environmental Assessment No. 88-095 and a Negative Declaration in connection with its consideration and approval of Amendment No. 1 to Revised Specific Plan 121-E, which Amendment implemented Change of Zone No. 88-031, Tentative Parcel Map No. 23749 and Plot Plan No. 88-393. On or about November 21, 1989, the City Council certified Environmental Assessment No. 89-141 and a Negative Declaration in connection with its consideration and approval of Amendment No. 2 to Revised Specific Plan 121-E, which Amendment implemented Plot Plan No. 89-421. On or about July 5, 1995, the City Council certified Environmental Assessment No. 95-304 and a Mitigated Negative Declaration in connection with its consideration and approval of Amendment No. 3 to Revised Specific Plan 121-E, which Amendment implemented Plot Plan No. 95-555. 0001301 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 On or about September 16, 1997, the City Council certified Environmental Assessment No. 97-340 and a Mitigated Negative Declaration in connection with its consideration and approval of Amendment No. 4 to Revised Specific Plan 121-E, which Amendment implemented General Plan Amendment No. 97-054; Change of Zone No. 97-083; Tentative Tract Map No. 28545; Site Development Permit Nos. 97- 607 and 97-608; and Certificate of Appropriateness No. 97-003. On or about June 19, 2001, the City Council certified an Addendum to EIR No. 41 in connection with its consideration and approval of Amendment No. 5 to Revised Specific Plan 121-E, which Amendment implemented Tentative Tract Map No. 30125; General Plan Amendment No. 2001-078; Change of Zone No. 2001-101; and Site Development Permit No. 2001-703. The Revised Specific Plan 121-E, as amended by Amendments Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, is referred to herein as the "Prior Project Modifications." The Proposed Modification is consistent with the Prior Project Modifications. 3. The Proposed Modification does not contemplate or propose substantial changes in the Prior Project Modifications, which will or would require major revisions of EIR No. 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents approved by the City, due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in EIR No. 49 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents referenced above. Rather, the Proposed Modification concerns a change in, and construction related to, the current recreational uses within a specific area of the La Quinta Resort, which specific area is currently used and is approved for commercial and recreational purposes. 4. No Substantial changes will occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Prior Project Modifications will be undertaken, as modified by the Proposed Modification described herein, which will or would require major revisions of EIR No. 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents approved by the City, due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the significant effects previously identified in EIR No. 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents approved by the City. 5. No new information of substantial importance which was not known, and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence, at the time EIR 000302 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 No. 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents were certified/approved as complete, has become available which shows any of the following: (A) The Proposed Modification will have one or more significant effects not discussed in EIR No. 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in EIR No 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Prior Project Modifications and/or Proposed Modification, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in EIR No. 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative. 6. Based upon these findings and the Addendum/Initial Study, the City Council has determined that no Subsequent EIR or Supplemental EIR is required or appropriate under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and 14 Cal. Admin. Code § § 15162; 15163 and 15164, and that an Addendum is sufficient to make EIR No. 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents apply to the Proposed Modification. 7. The Addendum/Initial Study, which was prepared to evaluate whether the Proposed Modification would cause any new or potentially more severe significant adverse effects on the environment, specifically analyzed, in addition to several other potential impacts, potential impacts related to cultural resources, traffic, air quality, noise and aesthetics. The analysis and conclusions for many of these specific potential impacts were based on, and relied upon, expert reports that are attached to the Addendum as Appendices A — E and which, together with the Addendum, provide the substantial evidence upon which the City Council's findings provided herein are based. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study, the City Council finds that the Proposed Modification will not have, when compared to EIR No. 000303 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents referenced above, any new or more severe adverse environmental impacts, in the defined Study Area, including without limitation, no new or more severe significant adverse impacts related to cultural resources, traffic, air quality, noise or aesthetics. The City Council makes the following more specific findings: (A) The Addendum/Initial Study specifically analyzed the Proposed Modification's potential effects on cultural resources, based upon the Historic Resources Evaluation prepared by Architectural Resources Group, which is attached to the Addendum as Appendix A and incorporated therein. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study and its Appendix A, the City Council finds that the Proposed Modification will not have any new or more severe significant impacts on cultural resources, including the historical context of such resources. In particular, the City finds, based on the photographic evidence presented at the hearing, that the current historic context surrounding the Morgan House has already been substantially compromised by the existing Jungle Gym, tennis courts, swimming pool, walls and fences which surround the Morgan House. Moreover, and in the alternative, the City Council finds that any temporary construction fence and/or proposed safety wall surrounding the Morgan House is categorically exempt from CEQA based upon the following CEQA Guidelines: 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facility, including subsection (f) (safety device)►; 15303 (Class 3-Small Structure, including subsection (e) (fences)►; 15311 (Class 1 1-Accessory Structures) and 15331 (Class 31- Historical Resource Protection Measure). (B) The Addendum/Initial Study specifically analyzed the Proposed Modification's potential impacts on traffic and circulation, based upon a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Endo Engineering, which is attached to the Addendum as Appendix B and incorporated therein. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study and its Appendix B, and the Supplemental Traffic Report submitted by Endo Engineering dated February 12, 2007, the City Council finds that the Proposed Modification will not have any new or more severe significant traffic or circulation and/or parking impacts, either on public roads or the internal circulation system at the Proposed Modification site. 000304 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 (C) The Addendum/Initial Study specifically analyzed the Proposed Modification's potential impacts on air quality, based upon an Air Quality Modeling and Analysis prepared by Impact Sciences, which is attached to the Addendum as Appendix C, and incorporated therein. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study and its Appendix C, the City Council finds that the Proposed Modification will not have any new or more severe significant impacts on air quality. (D) The Addendum/Initial Study specifically analyzed the Proposed Modification's potential impacts related to noise, based upon the Operational Acoustics Study prepared by Veneklasen & Associates, which is attached to the Addendum as Appendix D, and incorporated therein. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study and its Appendix D, the additional modifications which have been made to the proposal and the added Conditions of Approval to further reduce any residual noise impacts, and the Supplemental Noise report from Veneklasen dated 2/15/07, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, the City Council finds that the Proposed Modification will not have any new or more severe significant impacts related to noise. 8. The Proposed Project Modification will not have a significant adverse impact upon scenic views based upon the test set forth in CEQA case law (see e.g. Banker's Hill v. City of San Diego (2006) 149 Cal.App. 4" 249, 279 and Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.App. 4`" 572, 586-587). Specifically that "obstruction of a few private views in a project's immediate vicinity is not generally regarded as a significant environmental impact." Furthermore, independent of the above legal standard, the City Council finds, based on the photographic evidence and renderings presented at the hearing, as well as on the physical dimensions of the proposed structures, that any impact upon existing views of the Santa Rosa Mountains is less than significant, in that: 1) the Signature Pool rock formations have been substantially revised to reduce its mass and height; 2) the artificial rock foundation will blend with the scenic backdrop of the Santa Rosa Mountains; and 3) based upon current obstructions to the views at issue. 9. The Proposed Modification does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal 000305 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 10. The Proposed Modification does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no new or more severe significant adverse effects on the environment have been identified by the Addendum/Initial Study. 11. The Proposed Modification will not result in any new or more severe significant impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, when viewed in connection with planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. 12. The Proposed Modification will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, in that no new or more severe significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health or public services. 13. These factual findings are based upon EIR No. 41, all subsequently approved CEQA compliance documentation for the Prior Project Modifications, the Addendum/Initial Study and all documents referred in or attached to it -- including, without limitation the Historic Resources Evaluation; the Traffic Impact Analysis; the Air Quality Modeling and Analysis; the Operational Acoustics Study; and the Recommendations for Protective Fence at the Morgan House -- the submissions of the applicant; the records and files of the City's Community Development Department related to the Proposed Modification; and any and all other documents referred to or relied upon by the Revised Specific Plan, as amended. 14. The City Council has considered the Addendum, the EIR No. 41 and the subsequent CEQA compliance documents approved by the City, and has concluded that the Addendum reflects the independent judgment of the City. 15. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 California Code Regulations section 753.5(d). 16. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to the Proposed Modification is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. 000306 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings to justify approval of said Conditional Use Permit 1. Compliance with the General Plan - The project site within the La Quinta Resort is designated by the General Plan and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5 as Tourist Commercial. This Tourist Commercial designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Furthermore, the project site has been used for various Resort related recreational uses, including a previous "Signature Pool" where the sunken tennis courts presently exist. Therefore, the project is in compliance with the General Plan and Specific Plan. 2. Compliance with the Zoning Code - The City's Zoning Map and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5 designates the zoning of the project site within the La Quinta Resort as Tourist Commercial. This designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Applicable development standards are complied with based on the proposed plans, operation and recommended Conditions of Approval. No structures proposed exceed the 40 foot height limit nor are they setback less than the required 15 feet from residentially zoned properties. 3. Compliance with CEQA - The La Quinta Community Development Department has caused to be prepared Environmental Assessment 2006-573 (an Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Number 41 and to a series of subsequently approved environmental review documents) for this Site Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended. The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed modifications to the La Quinta Resort do not require a subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration, since the circumstances described in Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines do no exist, in that there will be no new or more significant impacts than those disclosed in the prior EIR Number 41 and the CEQA compliance documents approved subsequently. The modifications proposed and the circumstances under which the modifications would be 000007 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 carried out do not require substantial changes to the previous EIR, or the Subsequent Environmental documents, due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there is no new information of substantial importance which would trigger the requirement of a subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, upon certification of Environmental Assessment 2006-573 the project is in compliance with CEQA requirements. 4. Surrounding Uses - The recommended Conditions of Approval and site design of the project ensure that the Water Feature will operate in a manner that will minimize the impacts to the adjacent residential uses. Furthermore, the Conditions of Approval require problems or issues to be reviewed and resolved. The property to the south consists of Spa La Quinta, tennis courts and several Tennis Villas, only one of which abuts the subject property. To the north are a number of Tennis Villas. These Villas are privately -owned properties and some are rented out as part of the Resort. The project as proposed will incorporate measures to provide compatibility with the surrounding residential uses, such as sound attenuation through walls, lowering finish grades, extensive planting, parking controls, construction restrictions, etc. As noted in the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Addendum, and which have been specifically incorporated by reference herein, the Proposed Modification is not incompatible or injurious with the surrounding community. Conditions of Approval that ensure compatibility include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Parking studies and improvements will be required to eliminate problems that arise once the use is in operation. B. New Resort parking and traffic control employees will be assigned to the Water Feature area. C. A Parking Management Plan will be developed and implemented in conjunction with the completion of the Water Feature. D. The Date Palm grove at the corner of Avenida Obregon and Avenida tll 1�� City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 Fernando will be reserved for future use as a parking and/or loading area should it be determined by the City it is needed. E. Improvements to Avenida Obregon and access to it will ensure adequate parking and circulation is maintained. F. Days and hours of operation and allowable activities will be regulated to ensure that it is compatible with adjacent properties. G. Noise generated by the use and lighting used is required to comply with applicable City Requirements. This includes provisions to correct violations of City noise standards. H. Requirements for new masonry walls adjacent to the existing residential uses are provided to ensure privacy is maintained. WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1 . Compliance with the General Plan - The project site within the La Quinta Resort is designated by the General Plan and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5 as Tourist Commercial. This designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Furthermore, the project site has been used for various resort related recreational uses, including a "Signature Pool" where the sunken tennis courts presently exist. Therefore, the project is in compliance with the General Plan and Specific Plan. 2. Compliance with the Zoning Code - The City's Zoning Map and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5, zone the project site within the La Quinta Resort as Tourist Commercial. This designation permits the resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Applicable development standards are complied with based on the proposed plans and recommended Conditions of Approval. 3. Compliance with CEQA - As stated above, the Proposed Modifications have been reviewed in the Addendum prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 15164, and pursuant to Guideline 15162, no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration is required. 4. Architectural Design - The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements, are compatible with other plans approved for construction in the tract and other surrounding development in the City. 5. Site Design - The site design of the project, including, but not limited to project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian amenities, and other site design elements have been established by the previous development of the project area on the Resort grounds. The center tennis court area has been used for a Signature Pool in the past and with this project will be again used for that purpose. The project will be compatible with surrounding hotel development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. 6. Landscape Design - Project landscaping includes, but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials is designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, and provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses. It will provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, complement the surrounding project area and comply with City and CVWD water efficiency requirements, ensuring efficient water use. 7. Sign Programs - A comprehensive sign program, including on -site project and Resort directional signage is required upon approval of this project prior to issuance of first building permit. Resort area directional signage will include shuttle routes and stops. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the Findings of the City Council for the Addendum, CUP and the SDP. 000310 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 2. That it does hereby certify the Addendum for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and the staff report and as stated in the Addendum on file in the City Clerk's Department. 3. That the City Council has reviewed the Addendum, EIR No. 41, and the subsequent CEQA compliance documents, and had determined that the Addendum reflects the independent judgment of the City. 4. That the Community Development Director is directed to file a Notice, of Determination with the County Clerk regarding this action. 5. That the City Council does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2007-102, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and in the Staff Report and Staff Presentation, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, labeled Exhibit "A". 6. That the City Council does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2006-865, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and in the Staff Report and Staff Presentation, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval labeled Exhibit „B„ PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 20th day of March, 2007, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Don Adolph, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 000311. City Council Resolution No. 2007- Environmental Assessment 2006-573 Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: March 20, 2007 ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CIVIC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 0003111 EXHIBIT "A" CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 GENERAL The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Conditional Use Permit and related approvals, including but not limited to any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance document recorded thereunder or any other action against the City. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The applicant shall comply with all final Conditions of Approval for Site Development 2006-865 prior to opening, during the life of the project or as specifically required. 3. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 4. This Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall expire 24 months after its effective date if not used or implemented unless a legal action is filed challenging the CUP approval. In such event, the running of the 24-month period shall be tolled during the pendency of litigation challenging the CUP and any other action challenging the approval of this CUP or related Site Development Permit, and any related CEQA compliance documents. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. The applicant shall retain for private use all private street rights -of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable Specific Plans, Site Development Permit, and Conditional Use Permit Conditions of Approval, and/or as required by the City Engineer. TRAFFIC/PARKING 6. Parking Study/Studies may be required to evaluate parking conditions and requirements from on -site and off -site traffic to recommend parking management 000313 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20,2007 EXHIBIT "A" adjustments as noted below. The requirements for possible parking studies are as follows: A. If required by the Community Development Director, the applicant shall complete up to three parking studies after the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. B. The applicant is required (prior to issuance of the grading permit) to deposit with the City of La Quinta cash in the amount of $35,000 to be placed in a drawdown account for parking studies. After up to three studies are completed or within three years from the facility opening date the balance of the unexpended funds shall be refunded to the applicant. C. Prior to issuance of first building permit, the applicant shall enter into a Parking Study Agreement with the City of La Quinta. If parking studies are required by the City after the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, the applicant shall fund all expenses for up to three Parking Studies/evaluations that assess parking impacts associated with this Site Development Permit. The Parking Study/Studies is/are required to evaluate parking conditions and requirements from on -site and off -site traffic and must recommend parking management adjustments, or construction of additional parking facilities, if needed. The Parking Study/Studies shall be performed by a qualified Traffic Engineering or Parking Consultant, reviewed by the Community Development and Public Works Directors and approved by the Community Development Director. The applicant is required to pay for all expenses to conduct this/these study/studies for up to three years starting within one year from the facility's opening date. The seasonal timing of subsequent parking studies will be as determined by the Community Development Director. In addition to said requirement, the applicant shall be responsible for the design and construction of any measures and/or additional parking requirements resulting from the studies or as determined by the Community Development Director with improvements to commence construction within one (1) year of notification by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. Failure to implement required parking improvements within one year of written notification is grounds for revocation of the CUP. 7. Proposed Enhanced Parking and Traffic Controls: A. No less than 60 days prior to issuance of an occupancy permit or final inspection for Certificate of Occupancy for the water feature, a comprehensive Parking Management Program shall be submitted to the Community 000314 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-M CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 Development Director for review and approval. EXHIBIT "A" B. To control Resort use parking along Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando after opening of the water feature, a Parking Management Program shall be developed which requires parking permits and can be enforced through the ticketing of violators and the towing of vehicles parked without a permit in the Signature Pool area. The program shall include issuance of permits to Resort guests, Spa clients and club members at the front desk of the Resort. The program shall include providing a Traffic Control Manager, and traffic control officers who shall be responsible for monitoring delivery vehicles, patrolling Avenida Obregon and Fernando, and ensuring Avenida Obregon on -street parking restrictions are enforced. Additionally, the program shall include a "parking/traffic" hotline where immediate attention to issues and concerns will be resolved. C. The Resort Operator has committed and is required to implement the following program: 1. Hiring a "Traffic Control Manager" who has prior law enforcement, private security and/or traffic control experience. Management aspects of vehicular access into the Resort include: a. Traffic flow, loading, shipping and other related activities and parking control on Avenida Fernando; b. Access and egress of delivery trucks into loading dock areas; C. Traffic flow and parking enforcement on Avenida Obregon; d. Oversight of a contracted Security Officer monitoring the Resort service drive; e. Monitor and control the Purchasing deliveries to ensure vendor and third party delivery compliance with posted delivery hours. There shall be no deliveries between 1 Opm and lam. 2. Hiring a "Traffic Control Officer" who will conduct high visibility bike patrols on Calle Fernando and Calle Obregon in support of the Traffic Control Manager: a. Ensure property traffic flow patterns are maintained; CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 EXHIBIT "A" b. Eliminate opportunities where vehicles choose to park inappropriately; C. If observed, quick identification of vehicle owner or implementation of appropriate removal procedures; d. Ensure emergency vehicle access and egress is maintained at all times. 3. Initiate a "parking/traffic" hotline and publish and distribute the telephone number to appropriate residents and guard gate facilities. a. The "Traffic Control Officer" will maintain this cell phone and therefore be able to respond and evaluate the reported concerns if not observed during routine traffic control operations. D. During the off-season summer months (May through September), some of the off-street parking permits on -site may be made available to a limited number of club members with water feature access privileges. E. Shuttle transportation shall be made available to the water feature and spa from the main Resort parking lot, and Resort guests and club members shall be informed of its availability. F. The Resort is required to implement and enforce on a daily basis the approved Parking Management Program. Failure to implement the approved Parking Management Program on a daily basis will result in the City being able to cause the Resort to suspend the operation of all Active Water Features until such time that an updated Parking Management Program is approved by the Community Development Director. 8. If water feature parking demand exceeds available on -site parking supply on peak days in the future, cars shall not be allowed to park in adjacent neighborhoods. Additional off-street parking shall be provided at a remote location which is accessible by Resort operated shuttles and golf carts. Said remote parking locations and transportation provisions shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. 9. No modification, sale, or transfer of the existing off -site employee parking areas shall be implemented without prior written approval of the City. Prior to any sale or transfer of the property (APN 773-370-027) the Resort shall submit for approval by 000316 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 EXHIBIT "A" the Planning Commission at a public hearing, a revised Parking Management Program. 10. The following applies to the use of the Date Palm grove: A. The existing Date Palm Grove parcel (APN 658-160-053) on Avenida Obregon shall be held in reserve, and not developed with structures, in order to resolve any traffic or parking issues that may arise on Avenida Obregon. The Date Palm Grove parcel shall be used for that purpose, to the extent the City's Community Development Director finds that the use of the Signature Pool Facility has caused any additional traffic or parking problems on Avenida Obregon. This condition of approval shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission after three full years of Signature Pool operation (in conjunction with parking study requirements), to determine whether it may be removed as unnecessary. The applicant shall have the right to present argument and evidence to support the removal of this condition of approval at that time. B. On an annual basis after the first full year of operation, the design and effectiveness of the gated entry on Avenida Obregon at Avenida Fernando shall be evaluated by the City's Community Development and Public Works Directors. In the event that the City determines that its design and operation causes delays or backup on to Avenida Fernando, the gate area shall be modified to improve its efficiency. Modifications may include adding a drop- off/loading area located on the Date Palm grove, increasing the turning radius and/or other improvements to increase efficiency of operation. C. Failure to implement improvements within one year of written notification by the Community Development or Public Works Director shall be grounds for revocation of this CUP. 11. For the first year after opening of the water feature, monthly parking and traffic management reports shall be submitted to the Community Development Department with the following information included: A. Number and type of calls to the Resort hotline. B. Number of citations, vehicle tows and written warnings made pertaining to loading, traffic and parking. After the first year of operation, said reports shall be made available to the City within five working days of request by City. 12. The following requirements apply to drop off and loading of patrons: 0 C 0 y 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 EXHIBIT "A" A. The existing Obregon turnaround at the entry will be maintained and used for loading and unloading of guests using the facility that require shuttle or automobile access. B. The drop-off area at the turnaround shall not be reduced from its existing size. Additionally, the drop-off area design shall incorporate ADA accessible guidelines as approved by the Building & Safety and Public Works Department. C. The drop-off area at the turnaound shall be designated a passenger loading zone/shuttle stop/turn around area at the water feature entry where children destined to/from the water feature can be safely dropped off and picked up by their families. D. This turnaround shall also serve as a shuttle drop and loading point. E. During periods of peak use, the private passenger loading zone shall be at the gated entry on Avenida Obregon at Avenida Fernando. 13. A raised median (10 feet wide and 50 feet long) with a turn -around area shall be constructed on Avenida Obregon, just south of Avenida Fernando, to control and facilitate vehicle circulation and access in the Signature Pool area of the Resort. 14. Private property owners and their guests adjacent to Avenida Obregon shall have unrestricted access through this entry and turnaround to their properties at no cost to them. 15. If vehicle gates are required to be provided and operated as stipulated in SDP 2006- 865, they shall be operated as follows: A. The gate will restrict vehicular access to the Signature Pool. B. The gated entry shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. C. When and if the gate is operational, access through the entry gate shall be limited to use by: 1. Resort Homes property owners and their guests (at no cost to them); 000318 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 EXHIBIT "A" 2. All single-family owners and their guests who have access to Avenida Obregon (at no cost to them); 3. Resort guests; and 4. Club members having authorization to enter; and 5. Service and delivery vehicles that are operating in compliance with all Resort rules and regulations. OPERATION OF FACILITY 16. The Signature Pool facility shall not be open to the general public. 17. The La Quinta Resort shall not establish any special class of club membership in the future, that would allow time restricted (i.e. daily, weekly or monthly) access to the Signature Pool Facility. 18. Operating Periods/Times for the Wave Pool's Wave Generator Equipment shall be as follows: A. Between the Monday following Thanksgiving and the 2nd Thursday of March, the wave generator equipment shall be turned off, with three limited exceptions: Christmas, New Years and President's Day weekends. For those three weekends, the wave generator equipment for the wave pool may operate from 1 Oam to 6pm. During the time period defined above, the zero entry pool will be open, but it will not function as a wave pool. 19. Operating Periods/Times for all "Active Water Features" (defined as slides, lazy river and wave pool generator equipment) shall be as follows: A. Other than as specified in Condition of Approval No. 18.A. above for the wave pool generator equipment, the Active Water Features shall be operated as follows: 1. Spring Break (which begins three weeks prior to Easter Sunday and ends one week after Easter Sunday): open 7 days a week, 1 Oam - 6pm. 2. Easter Sunday, until start of Memorial Day weekend (standard weekend is Friday, Saturday, and Sunday; Open weekends 10am - 6pm. 000319 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 EXHIBIT "A" 3. Memorial Day weekend (starts Friday) through Labor Day: Open 7 days a week, 10am - 6pm. 4. Labor Day until Wednesday before Thanksgiving: Weekends, 10am - 6pm. 5. Thanksgiving Day (Thursday) through end of Thanksgiving weekend: daily, 10am - 6pm. 20. Operating hours for all outdoor uses, features, and activities not defined as an Active Water Features, shall be: 8am to 10pm, except for the formal pool, which shall operate: 7am to 1 Opm. The restaurant hours shall be 7am to midnight daily. 21. A. Guest access to the top and outside of the rock formations shall be prohibited year round when the water slides and wave pools are closed. B. The rock formation shall not be used to host any special events or activities other than to access the water slides. Food and beverage service and consumption shall be prohibited in these rock formation areas. 22. There shall be no evening movies between the Monday following Thanksgiving and the 2"d Thursday of March of each year. When permitted, the movies shall end by 1Opm. 23. The maximum number of water feature patrons shall not exceed 1,950 at any one time. The Resort shall actively monitor the ingress and egress of the Signature Pool area. 24. Outdoor meetings, dinners, receptions, etc. held within the Active Water Feature area shall not exceed 1,500 persons and shall end no later than 10pm (excluding clean-up and breakdown which shall be done quickly and quietly). No food or beverage may be served after 10pm. No amplified music is permitted within the Active Water Feature area from 6pm to 10pm during the period between the Monday following Thanksgiving and the 2nd Thursday of March. Music and entertainment such as acoustic guitar, luaus, etc. may be used during periods the Active Water Feature is open for use by this approval. 25. City Code Enforcement, Sheriff Department and Resort parking/traffic" hotline phone numbers shall be distributed to all private property owners within 200-feet of the water feature site prior to opening of the facility. 000320 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 EXHIBIT "A" 26. No fireworks shall be allowed for any function within the Signature Pool area. NOISE 27. A. If found to be in violation of City Noise Ordinance, in the reasonable opinion of the Building and Safety Director, an eight hour monitoring program shall be performed near the closest condominiums to the north and south of the Signature Pool site (as determined by the Building and Safety Director). If the monitoring program proves that violations of the City's Noise Ordinance are in fact occurring, the activity(s) causing the Noise Ordinance violation shall be closed, until a noise study and remedial noise control plan, funded by the applicant as noted below, is prepared and approved by the Community Development Director. The applicant has the right of appeal of this decision to the City Council. B. The applicant is required (prior to issuance of the building permit) to deposit with the City of La Quinta cash in the amount of $20,000 to be placed in a drawdown account for noise studies. After up to three studies are completed, or within three years from the facility opening date the balance of the unexpended funds shall be refunded to the applicant. C. Detailed plans for all amplified devises (music, speaker, p.a., etc.) shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permit for the water feature. Noise levels shall not exceed those permitted in the La Quinta Municipal Code or at levels which would constitute a public nuisance per Section 11.08.040 (LQMC). No amplified music is permitted within the Active Water Feature area from 6pm to 10pm during the period between the Monday following Thanksgiving and the 2nd Thursday of March. Within the Active Water Feature area live music and entertainment such as acoustic guitar, luaus, etc. may be used during permitted hours of operation. 28. Detailed plans for all amplified devises (music, speaker, p.a., etc.) in the Adult Pool area shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permit for the water feature. Noise levels shall not exceed those permitted in the La Quinta Municipal Code or at levels which would constitute a public nuisance per Section 11 .08.040 (LQMC). Live or amplified music or entertainment shall be allowed until 10pm in the Adult pool area. SIGNS 29. The Sign Program approved in conjunction with Site Development Permit 2006-865 00i?.31).1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 EXHIBIT "A" shall be maintained by the Resort for the life of the CUP. Signs shall comply with the following requirements: A. A Sign Program (for on- and off -site identification, directional, convenience, safety, etc.) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval a minimum of 60 days prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and/or final inspections. Should additional signs be desired by the applicant or required by parking studies, Conditions of Approval, etc., the Sign Program shall be amended and approved by the Community Development Director. B. Appropriate signage shall be provided, clearly indicating that parking adjacent to Avenida Obregon is by permit only. The Resort shall enforce this restriction. Signage shall state ticketing and vehicle towing of violators will occur. C. Directional signage shall be provided to clearly identify the pedestrian path to be used between the main Resort parking lot, Resort lobby, off -site (i.e. Centex project), and other parts of the Resort and the water feature. Shuttle routes shall be clearly marked. MISCELLANEOUS 30. Signature Pool Safety & Security Staff Coverage shall be at a minimum the following: Coverage Description Appointed Staff Hours of Coverage Traffic Control Management 1 Manager Daily (8 hour shift) Corner of Fernando and Obregon 1 Traffic Officer 7am-7pm Safety & Security Pool Supervisor 1 Supervisor hours of operation Safety & Security Pool Staff 14 Life Guards hours of operation (Life guards will be cross trained in the management of noise and crowd control) Security Officer at Pool Entry 1 Officer hours of operation After Hours Event Security Coverage 1 Officer hours of event 31. An Emergency Procedures Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Director for review and approval. The plan shall include the following: A. A comprehensive Emergency Procedures Plan (to include traffic control & enforcement policies) will be developed by the Resort Operator for the Signature Pool that closely resembles that of the Emergency Procedures Plan 000322 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007- EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 currently in place for the golf venues hosted at the La Quinta Resort & Club and at PGA West. The above -noted enhancements to the Resort's current Loss Prevention Operations shall be designed to create a safe and secure environment for the Resort guests and pro -actively manage the traffic flow in and around the La Quinta Resort & Club. LIGHTING 32. Exterior lighting shall comply with Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting) of the La Quinta Municipal Code. No lighting shall be directed towards privately -owned residential uses and freestanding lighting shall be limited to bollard or shielded and screened light fixtures not exceeding ten feet above the site finish grade. Exterior lighting plan with photometric study and manufacturers cut sheets shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of first building permit for project. No change to lighting systems shall be made without prior written approval of the Community Development Director. SITE DESIGN 33. In order to reduce nuisance impacts to adjacent residential properties, the lazy river shall have no guest access to the lazy river (emergency access is permitted) in the area between the lazy river and north property line. 34. The Resort shall be required to construct decorative patio walls (standard plan) up to six feet in height (from the Tennis Villas grade) within the landscape area between the units and the Signature Pool feature if requested by a Tennis Villa owner. The Resort shall be financially responsible for all reasonable costs associated with said wall(s). Temporary construction easements shall be provided by the Tennis Villas properties for the construction of said walls. Following approval by the City Council and within three months of notification to the applicable Homeowners Association (HOA), the HOA shall approve a standard plan described above in this condition. The individual homeowners shall have one month after the HOA approval and notification to them by the Resort to decide if they want a patio wall. If a Tennis Villa owner declines a patio wall or the HOA fails to approve the standard wall plan, the Resort shall have the right to construct a six foot wall (measured from the Tennis Villa grade) on the property line. If a Tennis Villa owner objects to a solid wall, the Resort shall construct a wrought iron fence per the approved fencing detail. The required wall or fence shall be constructed prior to CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-102 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: MARCH 20, 2007 issuance of Cerificate of Occupancy or Final Inspection for the active water features (whichever occurs first). 35. That a comprehensive landscaping, irrigation and fencing plan to resolve problems and improve the appearance shall be prepared for the Eisenhower Drive frontage and southern perimeter adjacent to the Bear Creek Bike Path and maintenance facility on Avenida Carranza for review by the ALRC and approval by the Planning Commission as a Business item. The plan shall be implemented and completed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Signature Pool facility. 0� 4 Exhibit "B" CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865 CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP ADOPTED: GENERAL 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit and related approvals, including but not limited to any CEQA compliance document recorded thereunder or any other action against the City. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: Fire Marshal Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Improvement Permit) e Community Development Department e Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department Y Desert Sands Unified School District o Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) — Stormwater Division, NPDES Permit Division • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) e California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SCAQMD Coachella Valley The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. A project -specific NPDES construction permit must be obtained by the applicant; and who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI"), prior to the issuance of a grading or site construction permit by the City. City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" 3. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08- DWQ. Additionally, the applicant shall be responsible for all requirements from the Coachella Valley Water District for the discharge of stormwater, nuisance water and other discharges to include pool maintenance drainage water into the Oleander Reservoir/La Quinta Evacuation Channel from the Site Development Permit site. Per the current Whitewater River Basin NPDES Permit, no discharge of chlorinated water is allowed. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. �� wW City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B- F. The approved SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. 4. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 5. Approval of this Site Development Permit shall not be construed as approval for any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the following conditions of approval. 6. This Site Development permit shall expire 24 months after its effective date if not used or implemented unless a legal action is filed challenging the SDP approval. In such event, the running of the 24-month period shall be tolled during the pendency of litigation challenging the SDP and any related CEQA compliance documents. 7. The applicant shall comply with all final Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 prior to Signature Pool opening, during the life of the project or as specifically required. PROPERTY RIGHTS S. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R's for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. 9. The applicant shall retain for private use all private street rights -of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 10. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: City Council Resolution No. 2007-_ Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Avenida Obregon — No additional private street easement is required on the existing Private Street measured at 21 feet gutter flow line to gutter flow line except at the proposed entry gate on Avenida Obregon south of Avenida Fernando to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. B. DROP-OFF AREA 1) The drop-off area shall not be reduced from its existing size. Additionally, the drop-off area design shall incorporate ADA accessible guidelines as approved by the Building & Safety and Public Works Department. 1 1 . When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights - of -way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas if required by the City Engineer or utility purveyor. 13. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 14. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right-of- way, or access easement, the Applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 15. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Site Development Permit and completion of the project, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 16. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. A. PRIVATE STREET 1) Avenida Obregon a) No additional private street easement is required except for the entry gate area at the intersection of Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon unless additional street widening is required by the City Engineer or Fire Marshal during plan checking and as per these conditions of approval. b) The drop-off area shall not be reduced from its existing size. Additionally, the drop-off area design shall incorporate ADA accessible guidelines as approved by the Building & Safety and Public Works Departments. c) The applicant/developer shall construct the new entry improvements, including curb gutter, raised median, sidewalk, future gate improvements, etc. and may be required to install a vehicle gate for the median entry on Avenida Obregon south of Avenida Fernando as determined by the Community Development Director. Design and specifications for the vehicle gates shall be submitted and approved with construction plans for the Avenida Obregon entry area. If required by the Community Development Director, the vehicle gates shall be installed within 4 months of the request, with the entry immediately manned by the Resort until the gates are installed. The gate will restrict vehicular access to the Signature Pool. The gated entry shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non - accepted vehicles. The gate shall be installed but does not need to be operational unless determined by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. The applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that dW321, City Council Resolution No. 2007-_ Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn- around (minimum radius to be 24 feet) out onto the Avenida Fernando from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of twenty feet width provided at the turn- around opening. When gate is operational, access through the entry gate shall be solely for use of Resort Homes, property owners, all single family owners who have access to Avenida Obregon and guests of those property owners, and hotel guests and club members having authorized entry cards. The entry lane shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. B. REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE STREETS 1. The applicant shall rehabilitate the full street pavement width of Avenida Obregon from Avenida Fernando to the gate located south of Vista Flora as approved by the City Engineer. Additionally, the applicant shall work with the owners of Avenida Fernando to rehabilitate the full street pavement width of Avenida Fernando from Eisenhower Drive to the gated entry west of Avenida Obregon as approved by the City Engineer. The rehabilitation shall be completed prior to occupancy but after completion of the signature pool construction as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 17. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 000330 City Council Resolution No. 2007-_ Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" '18. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 19. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. 20. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 21. The applicant shall clearly identify on plan and construct or reconstruct as required, an accessible route of travel, as defined in Section 1 102B and as required in Section 1114B.1.2 of the 2001 California Building Code, from the proposed Site Development Permit site to existing accessible public building entrances on the site, public transportation stops, accessible parking and passenger loading zones, and public streets or sidewalks, as approved by the City Engineer. 22. An appropriately sized designated passenger loading zone/shuttle stop/turn around area shall be provided along Avenida Obregon, at the water feature entry, where children destined to/from the water feature can be safely dropped off and picked up by their families [same as required in 9(B) and 15(A►(1)(b)1. This zone can also serve as a shuttle drop and loading point. During periods of peak use, the private passenger loading zone shall be at the gated entry on Avenida Obregon at Avenida Fernando. 23. Decorative street paving shall be provided at the drop off entry area to the signature pool area that is compatible with the color and style of nearby landscaping, paving and architecture. 24. The following applies to demolition and construction parking: A. The Resort shall submit to the Director of Building and Safety a comprehensive demolition/construction program consisting, but not limited to, number and duration of construction employees, equipment, and delivery schedules for review and approval prior to issuance of first demolition permit. The @ ge City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" of this program is to manage all phases of construction to ensure that roadways and on -site parking areas remain accessible and available for homeowners and their guests, and Resort guests. B. No construction parking shall be allowed in marked resort parking spaces or on streets open to the public and hotel quests. Location and provisions for construction parking, standby and overflow/back-up in designated construction areas shall be approved by the Building and Safety and Public Works Directors. No construction parking/waiting shall be allowed on Avenida Fernando, Calle Mazatlan and on Avenida Obregon within 100' of any privately owned residential use. However, temporary construction parking shall be allowed on the SDP site provided that when the site is closed for construction no vehicle/equipment over 8' tall shall be parked within 20' of an adjacent residential yard unless construction use requires it not be moved until its use is completed. These provisions shall be monitored and enforced by the Resort and the City of La Quinta. C. No construction parking shall be allowed in marked resort parking spaces or on streets open to the public and hotel quests. Location and provisions for construction parking, standby and overflow/back-up in designated construction areas shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. No construction parking/waiting shall be allowed on Avenida Fernando, Calle Mazatlan and on Avenida Obregon within 100' of any privately owned residential use. However, temporary construction parking shall be allowed on the SDP site provided that when the site is closed for construction no vehicle/equipment over 8' tall shall be parked within 20' of an adjacent residential yard unless construction use requires it not be moved until its use is completed. These provisions shall be monitored and enforced by the Resort and the City of La Quinta. In the event the Resort does not adequately manage construction vehicles, equipment, deliveries or overall access to Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando, the Building and Safety Director may suspend (stop) construction of the Signature Pool and related facilities until such time that alternative construction management practices are approved. 25. Applicant shall reconstruct and extend the existing 80 foot long northbound left turn pocket at Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Fernando to 150 feet minimum length, or as approved by the City Engineer within 24 months of issuance of the grading permit for the project. 00083i City Council Resolution No. 2007- Exhibit "B" Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: IMPROVEMENT PLANS 26. As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect,' refers to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 27. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 28. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans for the Site Development Permit area and project related off -site improvements not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Rough Grading/Demolition Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. SWPPP 1 " = 40' Horizontal NOTE: A through C to be submitted concurrently. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical D. On -Site Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical NOTE: D through E to be submitted concurrently. E. Site Development Plan/Precise Grading Plan Ito include design of Avenida Obregon entry gates) 1 " = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. 000311 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. The applicant shall prepare an accessibility assessment on a marked up print of the building floor plan identifying every building egress and note the 2001 California Building Code accessibility requirements associated with each door. The assessment must comply with submittal requirements of the Building & Safety Department. A copy of the reviewed assessment shall be submitted to the Engineering Department in conjunction with the Site Development Plan when it is submitted for plan checking. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Site Development" plan is required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 29. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the Online Engineering Library at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 30. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on mylars to the City Engineer. 31. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the mylars in order to reflect the as -built conditions. GRADING 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 33. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" 34. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC, and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 35. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 36. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the site development permit site plan, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 37. New building pad elevations are required to have one foot freeboard from the 100- year storm Hydraulic Grade Line (HGQ as determined by the revised Hydrology Report. 38. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the finish grade within this development. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "8" 39. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit Site Plan, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 40. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 41. The design for the discharge of chlorinated pool water shall be in accordance with all applicable laws and standards and as approved by the City Engineer. 42. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the La Quinta Resort and Country Club and as modified for this Site Development Permit. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 43. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 44. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 45. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 46. When an applicant proposes discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into the Coachella Valley Water District Stormwater Channel and if such discharge is permitted by the Coachella Valley Water District, the applicant shall indemnify the City from the costs of any sampling and testing of the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City- or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administlo`@0133t City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" assigns, and successors in interest in the land within the SDP area excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the indemnification shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the final development CC&Rs for meeting these potential obligations. The 100-year storm water HGL shall be 3 feet below the channel lining and 2 feet below the Project Storm HGL. The remaining Conditions of Approval (Numbers 47 through 51) under "Drainage" apply if it is determined that the discharge of stormwater, nuisance water, and/or chlorinated pool water or other discharges are not permitted by the Coachella Valley Water District and/or the City of La Quinta. 47. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. Pool areas may flood during the 100-year storm event as a result of existing hydrology limitations. Building Finish Floor elevations and pump systems shall comply with FEMA standards. 48. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 49. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 50. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 51. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. City Council Resolution No. 2007- Exhibit "B" Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: UTILITIES 52. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 53. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 54. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. CONSTRUCTION 55. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings, if any, only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. 56. A temporary construction fence shall be provided along all exterior perimeters of the Signature Pool site. Height, color, exact location, and materials of fence shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. All fences shall be constructed prior to demolition work beginning. 57. All Construction activities shall be limited to the hours and days prescribed in the City of La Quinta Municipal Code. 58. Divided light windows on new buildings shall have wood frames and exterior colors, materials, and plaster texture for new building construction shall to match those of existing on nearby buildings. 59. If off -site improvements and/or modifications are required or necessary to implement this project, approval by the affected off -site property owners shall be provided to the Community Development and Public Works Directors prior to City approval of the improvement plan(s) upon which the off -site improvement or modification is (are) shown on. City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" 60. All wall and fence construction shall comply with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.60.030. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 61. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 62. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and open areas. 63. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and open areas, if any, shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the Community Development Director. 64. The applicant or its agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5t' Edition or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right- of-way. 65. Final landscaping and irrigation plans (and precise grading plans relevant to landscape areas) shall be prepared by a licensed landscape professional and shall be reviewed by the ALRC and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of the first building permit. An application for Final Landscape Plan Check shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for final landscape plan review. Said plans shall include all landscaping associated with this project, including perimeter landscaping, and be in compliance with Chapter 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscaping) of the Municipal Code. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Coachella Valley Water District and Riverside County Agriculture Commissioner prior to submittal of the final plans to the Community Development Department. The trees shown on the final plans on the rock formations shall be limited to small trees that do not obstruct views and are compatible with the local mountain habitat. 66. That a comprehensive landscaping, irrigation and fencing plan to resolve problems and improve the appearance shall be prepared for the Eisenhower Drive frontage and City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" southern perimeter adjacent to the Bear Creek Bike Path and maintenance facility on Avenida Carranza for review by the ALRC and approval by the Planning Commission as a Business Item. The plan shall be implemented and completed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Signature Pool facility. QUALITY ASSURANCE 67. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 68. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the ,expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 69. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 70. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 71. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 72. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, sidewalks along Eisenhower Drive, Bear Creek Trail and Avenida Carranza (to maintenance facility). FEES AND DEPOSITS 73. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the WOW City Council Resolution No. 2007-_ Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. MORGAN HOUSE '74. The Morgan House temporary safety/security fence shall be a minimum of 6' high and architecturally compatible to and appropriate for the building to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Additionally, final fence design per the Telesis Engineering report included in Appendix E of the Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Pool (SDP 2006-865) as approved by the Directors of the Department of Building and Safety and Community Development. The location of the fence shall be approved by the Community Development and Building and Safety Department Directors consistent with the site plan prior to issuance of the first demolition or clearing permit. A temporary 6' high chain or metal fence shall be installed in the approved location prior to the beginning of demolition or clearing to ensure protection of the building and adjacent grounds not scheduled to be demolished. 75. A qualified Historic monitor or structural engineer approved by the City shall be on - site during all project demolition or construction within 100' of the Morgan House that will create vibration or noise that may negatively affect it. The monitor shall be empowered to stop work if he/she feels the building is being detrimentally affected. The Community Development Director shall be consulted if work is stopped. Proof of retention of monitor shall be given to Community Development Director prior to issuance of demolition/grading permit. A written progress monitoring report shall be submitted to the Community Development Director each Monday for the preceding week's work. 76. A final report on the monitoring shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the project. FIRE DEPARTMENT 77. The Fire Department requires the listed fire protection measures be provided in accordance with the La Quinta City Municipal Code and/or the Riverside County Fire Department Fire Protection Standards. Final conditions will be addressed when complete buildings plans are reviewed. 78. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering a fire flow 1500 gallons per minute for a two hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed 0%oil� City Council Resolution No. 2007- Exhibit "B" Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts. LLP Adopted: construction site. 79. Approved accessible on site fire hydrants shall be located not to exceed 330 feet apart in any direction as measured by an approved route around the complex, exterior of the facility or building, and no portion of a building further than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants shall provide the required fire flow. 80. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall furnish two copies of the water system fire hydrant plans to Fire Department for review and approval. Plans shall be, signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for review and approval. 81. Prior to issuance of building permits, the water system for fire protection must be provided as approved by the Fire Department and the local water authority. 82. Applicant/Developer shall mount blue dot retro-reflectors pavement markers on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicated location of the fire hydrant. It should be 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 83. Access lanes will not have an up, or downgrade of more than 12%. Access will not be less than 20 feet in width and have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 80 thousand pounds over 2 axles. Access will have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Access lane shall be constructed with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. 84. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval; a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane printing and/or signs. 85. An approved Fire Department access key lock box (Minimum Knox Box 3200 series model) shall be installed next to the approved Fire Department access door to the building. If the buildings are protected with an alarm system, the lock box shall be required to have tampered monitoring. Required order forms and installation standards may be obtain at the Fire Department. d City Council Resolution No. 2007-_ Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" 86. Display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side of building(s) and/or rear access if applicable. Numbers and letters shall be a minimum of 12" in height for building(s) up to 25' in height. In complexes with alpha designations, letter size must match numbers. All addressing must be legible, of a contrasting color, and adequately illuminated to be visible from street at all hours. 87. Install a complete commercial fire sprinkler system (per NFPA 13 1999 Edition). Fire sprinkler system(s) with pipe sizes in excess of 4" in diameter will require the project Structural Engineer to certify with a "wet signature", that the structural system is designed to support the seismic and gravity loads to support the additional weight of the sprinkler system. All fire sprinkler risers shall be protected from any physical damage. The PIV and FCD shall be located to the front, within 25 to 50 feet of hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). Sprinkler riser room must have indicating exterior and/or interior door signs. A C-16 licensed contactor must submit plans, along with current $307.00 deposit based fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. Guideline handouts are available for the Fire Department. 88. Install an alarm monitoring system for fire sprinkler system(s) with 100 or more heads (20 or more in Group I, Division 1.1 and 1.2 occupancies). Valve monitoring, water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station in accordance with 2001 CBC, Sec. 904.3.1. An approved audible sprinkler flow alarm shall be provided on the exterior in an approved location and also in the interior in a normally occupied location. A C-10 licensed contractor must submit plans designed in accordance with NFPA 72, 1999 Edition, along with the current $192.00 deposit based fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. Guideline handouts are available from the Fire Department. 89. Install a portable fire extinguisher, with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC, for every 3,000 sq. ft. and/or 75 feet of travel distance. Fire extinguishers shall be mounted 3.5 to 5 ft above finished floor, measured to the top of the extinguisher. Where not readily visible, signs shall be posted above all extinguishers to indicate their locations. Extinguishers must have current CSFM service tags affixed. 90. No hazardous materials shall be stored and/or used within the building, which exceeds quantities listed in UBC Table 3-D and 3-E. No class I, II or IIIA of combustible/flammable liquid shall be used in any amount in the building. 91. Exit designs, exit signs, door hardware, exit markers, exit doors, and exit path marking shall be installed per the 2001 California Building Code.�4,� ,1 City Council Resolution No. 2007- Exhibit "B" Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: 92. Electrical room doors if applicable shall be posted "ELECTRICAL ROOM" on outside of door. 93. Access shall be provided to all mechanical equipment located on the roof as required be the Mechanical Code. 94. Air handling systems supplying air in excess of 2000 cubic feet per minute to enclosed spaces within buildings shall be equipped with an automatic shutoff. Ref CIVIC 609.0 95. Gate(s) shall be automatic or manual operated. Install Knox key operated switches, series KS-2P with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of the Knox Company. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval of mounting location/position and operating standards. Special forms are available from this office for ordering the Key Switch. Current plan check deposit based fee is $126.00. Contact the Fire Department for a guideline handout. 96. Nothing in our review shall be construed as encompassing structural integrity. Review of this plan does not authorize or approve any omission or deviation from all applicable regulations. Final approval is subject to field inspection. All questions regarding the meaning of the code requirements should be referred to Fire Department at 760-863-8886. 97. Fire Department access to the artificial "rock formations" is required from the west side of the SDP site. This access is to be provided through four of the remaining tennis courts per the attached exhibit "A". If an alternative access is found to be acceptable, it shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director and approved by the Fire Marshal. CONSTRUCTION NOISE ATTENUATION 98. The construction contractor shall submit a noise control plan to the Building and Safety Director for approval, to be implemented as part of the construction project and process that will minimize the level and time of construction activities. At a minimum, the following construction noise attenuation measures shall be included in the plan: lb y City Council Resolution No. 2007- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Site Development Permit 2006-865 CNL Desert Resorts, LLP Adopted: Exhibit "B" A. Stationary equipment shall be staged away from the surrounding residential units and temporary noise barriers or enclosures shall be utilized around staging areas. B. Quiet equipment such as air compressors, concrete pumps and generators, etc. shall be used by the construction contractor. C. Temporary noise barriers shall be used at specified locations either around specific construction activities and/or at the perimeter of the construction site to reduce localized noise impact to adjacent residential units. D. Construction activity scheduling shall be utilized to limit higher noise level operations to the middle of the day when ambient noise levels are typically at their highest levels to mask the construction activity noise levels, thereby reducing the perceived impact. 00, 0843 0001,,10 ATTACHMENT #1 ERRATA TO ADDENDUM FOR THE LA QUINTA RESORT SIGNATURE POOL (Site Development Permit 2006-865 Conditional Use Permit 2007-102) The Addendum previously identified the area to be redeveloped by the proposed uses included Site Development Permit Application 2006-865 as occupying a total area of 7.4-acres. Site Development Permit 2006-865 seeks to redevelop an area that encompasses a total of 4.7-acres. All references throughout the Addendum and five technical appendices of the Addendum to the Site Development Permit 2006-865 or "project site" boundaries refer to this 4.7-acre area, not 7.4-acres. Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 is being processed as a part of the request to redevelop an area that encompasses a total of 4.7-acres. All references throughout the Addendum and five technical appendices of the Addendum to the Site Development Permit 2006-865 apply to Conditional Use Permit 2007-102 regarding operational aspects of the request. 000347 Addendum forthe La Quinta Resort Signature Pool (Site Development Permit 2006-865) Prepared for: City of La Quinta, Community Development Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253-1504 Contact: Douglas R. Evans, Community Development Director (760)777-7125 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 234 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 205 Pasadena, California 91101 Contact: Ali H. Mir (626) 564-1500 January 2007 0003,48 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1 ProjectBackground..............................................................................................................................5 Purposeof an Addendum....................................................................................................................9 Description of the Proposed La Quinta Resort Signature Pool..........................................................12 Summary of Supplemental Technical Studies Analyzing the Proposed Project...............................14 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS..........................................................................................................17 I. Aesthetics.................................................................................................................................23 II. Agricultural Resources.............................................................................................................26 III. Air Quality .................................................................................................................................27 IV. Biological Resources................................................................................................................32 V. Cultural Resources...................................................................................................................34 VI. Geology/Soils...........................................................................................................................37 VII. Hazards & Hazardous Materials...............................................................................................39 Vill. Hydrology/Water Quality ..........................................................................................................41 IX. Land Use/Planning.................................................................................................................A5 X. Mineral Resources...................................................................................................................47 XI. Noise.......................................................................................................................................48 , XII. Population/Housing..................................................................................................................53 XIII. Public Services.........................................................................................................................54 XIV. Recreation................................................................................................................................56 XV. Transportation/Traffic...............................................................................................................57 XVI. Utilities/Service Systems..........................................................................................................61 XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance.........................................................................................63 XVIII. Earlier Analysis.........................................................................................................................65 APPENDICES Appendix A — Historic Resources Evaluation (2006) Appendix B — Traffic Impact Analysis (2007) Appendix C — Air Quality Modeling and Analysis (2006) Appendix D — Operational Acoustics Study (2007) Appendix E — Recommendations for Protective Fence at the Morgan House (2006) LIST OF FIGURES Figure Paqe 1. Regional Vicinity Map...........................................................................................................................6 2. Existing Site Plan with Surrounding Land Uses...................................................................................7 3. Proposed Project Architectural Rendering.........................................................................................15 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Estimated Maximum Construction Equipment in Use Per Day..........................................................28 2. Estimated Unmitigated Construction Emissions................................................................................29 3. Estimated Unmitigated Operation Emissions....................................................................................30 000349 r� 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR Number 41) adopted in April 1975 by the County of Riverside, and the series of subsequent environmental review documents for modifications and additions to the La Quinta Resort, through 2001, prepared by the City of La Quinta. These documents have been used as a basis for this Addendum to evaluate the environmental effects of the construction of the proposed La Quinta Resort Signature Pool (proposed project)', as compared to the level of environmental impacts previously disclosed in the County's and City's prior CEQA compliance documents. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21167.2, the findings and determinations contained in the previously adopted CEQA compliance documents are conclusively presumed to be valid. Development of the La Quinta Resort has been assessed in multiple CEQA documents over the course of the last 30 years prior to and after the incorporation of the City of La Quinta. The purpose of this Addendum is to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed La Quinta Resort Signature Pool, and to determine whether any of the circumstances outlined in CEQA Guideline 15162 exist, which might require preparation of a different CEQA compliance document. A table summarizing the development history and record of environmental review for the La Quinta Resort is provided in the table below. Development and CEQA Documentation History of the La Quinta Resort Environmental Document(s) and Name Date Description Resolutions SP 121-E La Quinta Cove Golf Club EIR No. 41 4/1975 637 condos; 496 hotel rooms, golf course, clubhouse and service facility ' For simplicity purposes, the proposed Signature Pool is referred to in this document as the "proposed project." However, the proposed activities are more accurately described as modification to the previously approved project, namely, the La Quinta Resort. 000350 Addendum for die La Quint a Resort Signature Pool Environmental Document(s) and Name Date Description Resolutions SP 121-E Change of zone #3491 and Neg. Dec. EA #15145/Neg. Dec. Revised for EA 15145 (La Quinta City Council 10/5/82 Addition of 279 condos and 146 hotel Resolution 82-54) rooms (916 condos total and 642 hotel rooms) SP 121-E Change of zone Add 2.1 acres of EA #88-095/Neg. Dec.; Revised #88-031 land to Santa impacts same as those Amendment No. Rosa for SP 121-E Revised 1 9/20/1988 Tentative Parcel development for Map #23749 overflow parking City Council Resolution Plot Plan #88-393 and maintenance 88-112 building EA 15145/Neg. Dec. SP 121-E Description EA 89-141/Neg. Dec. Revised Amendment No. Removal of championship tennis City Council Resolution 2 court, small tennis club building, 89-124 11/21/1989 several adjacent parking spaces and construct a two-story 43,065 sq. ft. hotel addition + 44 new parking spaces Plot Plan #89-421 Tentative Tract Tentative Tract No. 25237 • Initial Study No. 25237; re: re -subdivision of Resubdivision of Tracts 14496-6 and . EA # 89-146/Neg. Tracts 14496-6 14496-7 consisting of 26.81 acres Dec. and 14496-7 3/20/1990 into 54 single-family lots; avg. 15,500 sq. ft. City Council Resolution 90-23 [These lots were zoned for 127 condos under SP 121-E] SP 121-E 16,000 sq. ft. ballroom and sub -level City Council Resolution Revised parking garage 95-56 (Amendment to Amendment No. Specific Plan) 3 Plot Plan 95-555 7/5/1995 City Council Resolution 95-55 (for mitigated Neg. Dec. for EA No. 95-304) 000351 Addendum for the La Quin6+ Resort Signature Pool Name Date Description Environmental Document(s) and Resolutions SP 121-E GPA 97-054 Residential EA No. 97-340; Revised Units: 119 mitigated Neg. Dec. Amendment No. Change of Zone 97- 9 4 083 Spa Initial Study Addendum TTM 28545 Fitness Center for EA No. 97-340 Site Development Employee Planning Commission Permit No. 97-607 parking lot: 244 Resolution No. 97-042 (Amend. No. 4) Site Development spaces Planning Commission Permit No. 97-608 Resolution No. 97-043 Certificate of (TfM 28545) 9116/97 Appropriateness Planning Commission No, 97-003 Resolution No. 97-044 (development permit) Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-046 (development permit) City Council Resolution 97-74 (Amend. No. 4) City Council Resolution 97-72 (EA and mitigated Neg. Dec.) Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Name Date Description Environmental Document(s) and Resolutions SP-121E - TTM No. 30125 (subdivision of Planning Commission Revised 17.82 acres into 65 lots) Resolution 2001-080 Amendment No. 5 - Addendum to EIR No. 41 (EIR Addendum) (5/8/01) • GPA 2001-078 Planning Commission - Change of zone 2001-101 Resolution 2001-081 (GPA) (5/22/01) • Specific Plan Amend. No. 5 Planning Commission - Site Development Permit ("SDP") Resolution 2001-085 2001-703 (TTM) (5/22/01) 6/19/2001 Planning Commission (date of City's Resolution 2001-083 adopting (Amend. No. 5) resolutions) (5/22/01) Planning Commission Resolution 2001-084 (SDP) (5/22/01) Planning Commission Resolution 2001-082 (ZC 2001-101) (5/22/01 City Council Resolution 2001-83 (EIR Amendment; GPA; Zon Change; Amend No. 5; and SDP) w353 Addendum fm die La QuinW ResortSignaLne Poo[ PROJECT BACKGROUND The City of La Quinta, California is located approximately 105 miles from the City of Los Angeles and the Pacific Coast, and approximately 240 miles from the Phoenix/Scottsdale metropolitan region as shown on Figure 1. The La Quinta Resort encompasses approximately 62 acres, not including golf course uses, and is located within the corporate limits of the City of La Quinta, in Riverside County. The City of La Quinta, a 31-square-mile municipality located in the southeastern portion of the Coachella Valley, was incorporated in 1982. The City is bounded on the west by mountainous land and the City of Indian Wells and Palm Desert; on the east, by the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County; on the north by Riverside County; and federal and county lands to the south. The proposed La Quinta Resort Signature Pool site is currently developed with tennis courts, an outdoor pool, and Landscaped walkways, and is located entirely within the existing La Quinta Resort, accessible from Avenida Obregon (north -south road) and Avenida Fernando (east -west road). As shown in Figure 2, the project site is generally bordered by existing La Quinta Resort tennis villas on the north, existing La Quinta Resort homes and Spa La Quinta on the south, Avenida Obregon on the east with existing La Quinta Resort homes and existing La Quinta Resort and Club facilities across Avenida Obregon, and existing La Quinta Resort tennis villas and tennis courts on the west. The La Quinta Resort & Club has been operating for over 80 years and contains approximately 800 guest rooms, including Villas. Recreational amenities for guests include golf courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, hot tubs, and a spa and fitness center. These facilities include: 23 tennis courts, 42 pools, 52 hot tubs, and 5 restaurants. Approximately 32 of the 48 nearby tennis villas participate in a rental program administered by the hotel during the peak season. The La Quinta Resort appeals primarily to business travelers, conference attendees, and mature leisure travelers. Hotel guests typically use the golf or tennis facilities. According to the Applicant, the proposed project would promote a more balanced customer mix of business travelers and leisure guests, groups, families, and individuals. Although individual business travelers typically book rooms on weekdays, families tend to book vacations during the months when schools are not in session, which is the non -peak season at the La Quinta Resort, and on weekends. 000354 r - - DGlVVN83T b'alN3/Ib�r s�„v: T�� % If�� C Y � t r�� • � � ifll �� --..�� if-��ir--�+Wc1='�►-i�i= ry ��'*.i r yR . r e., � Coon) fF �•r-) r _.-,. . .1I� .i4. �•- . �: �� tl'}x. :'� ,�'-=f} �y -fir __.• .� , bv cc +-'K.1!� ..-_.�' .-LTr �r-•^ .E .-_ .r-t._ •17�' TrJfi1?�._" . �.:• '.y,.�. �� /. 4 _. _. YL--i� 7 j;..-1; {• , r i � '- .,'i Ya y e``i! • '• +{g A :� � :� i -� �� lSS i -- ' _._ t '"Y Fv`i� ' G •i�-._�1 a'°u ('� ' � ��i�;i>s �-� �1 �, �Met Cc CL -= - 8 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature. Pool - In the peak season (January through April), the hotel occupancy is relatively high and the Resort often achieves full occupancy on the weekends. However, the average monthly occupancy rate in the off-peak season is substantially lower. The Signature Pool complex is proposed to improve hotel occupancy, particularly in the off-peak summer months, by providing a family oriented recreational amenity that is complementary to the other recreational facilities available at the resort. The existing tennis and fitness facilities on site are available for use by hotel guests, and are also available to individuals who are not hotel guests, "non -hotel guest users," through Club Membership affiliated with the La Quinta Resort & Club. The amenities included in the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool would be predominantly used by hotel guests, but would also be available to club members. Club memberships permit non - hotel guests to access the resort fitness facilities and participate in an array of programs and activities including golf practice, use of three clubhouses, tennis privileges, and concierge services. Club members are also entitled to preferred pricing on all resort golf courses, at all resort restaurants, on rooms for guests and family, and at the Spa La Quinta. I All of the club members have access to the resort facilities. Memberships are available in different classes, with and without golf privileges. There are currently a total of 476 golf memberships, and 386 non -golf memberships. The average age of current club members exceeds 55 years. All memberships allow the member, the member's spouse, and their children under the age of 23 years, to share in membership privileges, which would include access to the proposed Signature Pool complex. There are no plans to change the structure of the existing club membership program, or create a new club membership program in the future solely to permit access to the water feature. The cost of club membership is a minimum of $15,000.00 (to initiate a non -golf club membership) plus a monthly fee of $210.00. While the availability of the new proposed Signature Pool complex would provide some additional incentive to become a club member, given the cost of club membership, it is unlikely that many additional club memberships would be sold because of the addition of the proposed Signature Pool complex. Based upon information provided by the Applicant, Resort members make very minimal use of the existing pool. The primary users of the existing pool are hotel guests, and this is not anticipated to change with operation of the proposed Signature Pool. 91 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool The existing tennis and fitness facilities are accessible to club members and their guests who are not club members with payment of a nominal forty -dollar fee. Club members would not be allowed to bring any guests into the proposed La Quinta Resort Signature Pool who are not other club members, unless they are registered guests of the La Quinta Resort Hotel. PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM Once a mitigated negative declaration (MND) or environmental impact report (EIR) has been prepared and adopted for a project, CEQA provides for the update of the information in the adopted MND/EIR to address changes to the project, or changes to the circumstances under which the project will occur. Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines states: a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; 000-359 0 Addendum for the La Quints Resort Signature Pool (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be t feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce - one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. (c) Once a project has been approved, the lead agency's role in project approval is completed, unless further discretionary approval on that project is required. Information appearing after an approval does not require reopening of that approval. If after the project is approved, any of the conditions described in subdivision (a) occurs, a subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall only be prepared by the public agency which grants the next discretionary approval for the project, if any. In this situation no other responsible agency shall grant an approval for the project until the subsequent EIR has been certified or subsequent negative declaration adopted. (d) A subsequent EIR or subsequent negative declaration shall be given the same notice and public review as required under Section 15087 or Section 15072. A subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall state where the previous document is available and can be reviewed. Note: Authority cited: Public Resources Code Section 21083; Reference: Section 21166, Public Resources Code; Bowman v. City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1065; Benton v. Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467; and Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v. California Department of Health Services et al. (1995) 38 Cal.AppAth 1574. Therefore, the proposed project would not require that a subsequent EIR or MND be prepared where the lead agency (in this case the City) determines that none of the circumstances in Section 15162(a)(1)-(3) exist. In the event that those circumstances do occur, the lead agency may prepare an Addendum to either an EIR or a Negative 000350 10 AdAm&m for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Declaration if only minor or technical changes or additions to the project occur. An (^ Addendum to an adopted MND/EIR shall be prepared if some.changes or additions are needed, but none of the conditions calling for a subsequent MND/EIR has occurred. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states: a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. (d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. Note: Authority cited: Public Resources Code Section 21083; Reference: Section 21166, Public Resources Code; Bowman v. City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App_3d 1065; and Benton v. Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467. Therefore, based on the entire record before the City, this Addendum to the previously prepared CEQA documentation for development at the La .Quinta Resort has been prepared because (1) no substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous CEQA documentation due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts; (2) no substantial changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken will occur, which will require major revisions of the previous CEQA documentation due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (3) no 000360 11 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSigwture Pool new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have ' been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous CEQA documentation was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous CEQA documentation; (B) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous CEQA documentation; (C) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or, (D) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt these mitigation measures or alternatives. These proposed findings are supported by the Environmental Assessment and the technical studies appended to this Addendum, all of which constitute substantial evidence. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED LA QUINTA RESORT SIGNATURE POOL The La Quinta Resort Signature Pool would involve the redevelopment of approximately 7.4 acres of the existing 62-acre La Quinta Resort with new recreational features for hotel guests and club members. The proposed project would include several related water and pool -featured amenities. Proposed amenities include: an arrival plaza, children's outdoor play area, a lazy river that proceeds in a circular loop, a formal outdoor pool with terraces, private pool -side cabanas, a game room with first aid center, outdoor dining terraces, splashdown pool for slides, a wave pool, chaise lounge deck, and secure gate entry points. All mechanical equipment to facilitate the filtration and. flow of water for the aforementioned amenities would be housed in two separate artificial rock features that would be integrated in form and function into the proposed project. The southerly rock feature would also serve as the platform for water slides into the splashdown pool. The proposed structures would be similar in size and scale to the existing architecture in and around the project site. The Morgan House, which is located within the project site, would not be changed in any way by the proposed project. A setback and safety fence would also be installed around the Morgan House to avoid any possible impacts from nearby construction activity and also to protect pedestrians in the future from any seismic event that might impact the Morgan House. Please see Figure 3 for an architectural site plan of the proposed 12 000301 Addendum fm the La {wintu Resort Signature Poo[ architectural site plan of the proposed Signature Pool. Refer to Appendix E, Telesis Engineers, Recommendations for Protective Fence at the Morgan House. The Signature Pool is proposed on a portion of the La Quinta Resort that presently contains existing recreational facilities, including an outdoor swimming pool and tennis courts. Specifically, this area presently contains nine existing tennis courts, the existing tennis stadium (center court), an existing restroom building, and an existing outdoor swimming pool. Existing facilities located within or adjacent to the project site that would not be changed in away by the proposed project are a bar/restaurant, tennis/fitness clubhouse, spa facilities, and the Morgan House. The proposed project is designed as a private gated recreational amenity for use by hotel guests of the La Quinta Resort, as well as La Quinta Resort Club members and their families. The proposed project would not be open to the general public and is not intended to function as a theme park or public water slide park. Additionally, the Signature Pool would be located in an area that is not visible to the general public or any adjacent public roadways. ( ? The objective of the proposed project is to increase occupancy levels of the existing La Quinta Resort during the off-peak summer season by adding a family -oriented amenity to complement the other features and facilities of the existing resort. As a part of the proposed project, a raised median (10 feet wide and 50 feet long), with a turn -around area would be constructed on Avenida Obregon, at Avenida Fernando. A drop-off area designed to facilitate the loading and unloading of hotel guests and club members, would be constructed on Avenida Obregon at the Signature Pool entry, to facilitate vehicle circulation in this part of the Resort. Removal of approximately 12 parking spaces would be required, to create the new entry feature and security checkpoint for the Signature Pool. No other changes to existing private drives and public roadways are proposed. Currently, associates employed at the La Quinta Resort park off site at the Tampico Parking lot. At times when the Resort has a lower occupancy in the summer months for instance, associates are allowed to park on site. This is controlled by the Resort's Loss Prevention Department which administers parking restrictions within the Resort based on �._ the levels of occupancy and use at the Resort. 0003�� 13 Addendum for Ste La Quinta Resort Signature Pool There are shuttles that operate on the Resort property that are dedicated to shuttling Resort associates to and from off -site parking as well as guest shuttles dedicated to shuttling Resort guests around the Resort property and to gold courses and other local venues. With the operation of the Signature Pool feature, the Resort would revert to the high season parking plan and require associates and guests to parking in a similar manner to that which is implemented during high season months. The La Quinta Resort Signature Pool would be open daily between Memorial Day and Labor Day from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM, and on weekends the remainder of the year. In addition, the proposed project would be open daily during Thanksgiving week, from Christmas through New Year's Day, on Presidents' Day weekend, and for one to three weeks during spring. An underground system that would be located on site would accept backwash from the proposed water features, including pools and fountains. Every four days, the water from the features would be changed out through an underground pressurized line that would lead from inside one of the artificial rock formations to an underground storage tank, would filter sediments, oils, etc., and would then send the water to an underground i percolation chamber. From there, the water would percolate into the ground per a soils engineer's testing and recommendations. The potential of environmental impacts being caused by the construction and operation of the proposed project are assessed in this Addendum, using the City of La Quinta Environmental Checklist Form, in Section 2.0, Environmental Analysis. SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL STUDIES ANALYZING THE PROPOSED PROJECT Through consultation with City Staff and the Applicant's community outreach efforts, including community study sessions, the City determined that supplemental technical studies should be prepared to address historic resources on and adjacent to the project site, traffic circulation, and noise issues raised by nearby residents. Five studies appended to this document were used in preparation of the analysis in regards to Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Transportation/Traffic, Noise, and the necessity of a safety fence around the Morgan House setback area. t � 000363 14 Addendum for Me La Quinta Resort Signature Pool A Historic Resources Evaluation was prepared for the Morgan House adobe structure located within the La Quinta Resort. This Evaluation was prepared by Architectural Resources Group in June 2006 and is included in Appendix A. The Morgan House is not only located within the La Quinta Resort, it is also within the boundaries of the project site, although as explained previously, the proposed project design does not affect the Morgan House structure. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by Endo Engineering in January 2007 and is included in Appendix B. An Acoustics Studies analyzing noise impacts from the operation of the proposed project, in terms of occupancy noise and mechanical noise, was prepared by Veneklasen and Associates in January 2007. This acoustics study is included in Appendix D. Finally, a report recommending a seismic safety fence around the Morgan House is included in Appendix E. { All five studies included project design features and management plans to be incorporated into the design and operation of the proposed project to maintain potential impacts at their lowest levels possible. All studies found that the proposed project would not result in significant impacts in regards to aesthetics, cultural resources, traffic, circulation, parking, and noise. Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, TransportationfTraffic and Noise are analyzed in detail, in Section 2.0, Environmental Analysis, using the findings of the studies described above, as well as additional analysis. 000365 16 Addendum for the La Que to Resort Signature Pool 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Environmental Checklist Form Project title: La Quinta Resort Signature Pool (Site Development Permit 2006-865). Lead agency name and address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Contact person and phone number: Douglas R. Evans — 760-777-7125 4 Proiect location: West of Avenida Obregon, south of Avenida Fernando, at the La Quinta Resort in La Quinta, California. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 658-160-053-0, 658-160-054-1, 658-460-055-2, 658-160-058-5,and 6587160-061-7. 5. Proiect sponsor's name and address: CNL Hotels and Resorts,. Inc. David Urban P.O. Box 4975 Orlando, Florida 32802-4975 6. General Plan Designation 7. Zoning Existing: TC-(RSP) Tourist Commercial Existing: TC-(RSP) Tourist Proposed: No Change Proposed Commercial Proposed: No Change Proposed 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including, but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The La Quinta Resort Signature Pool (proposed project)2 would involve the development of new recreational features for hotel guests and club members on approximately 7.4 acres of the existing 62-acre La Quinta Resort. The proposed new pool complex would include several related features including a wave pool, splash pool, formal pool, toddler -wading pool, and a lazy river. The proposed project is designed as a private gated recreational amenity for use by hotel guests of the La Quinta Resort as well as La Quinta Resort Club members and their children under the age of 23. The proposed Signature Pool would not be open to the general public and is not intended to function as a theme park or public water slide park. z For simplicity purposes, the proposed Signature Pool is referred to in this document as the 'proposed project." However, the proposed activities are more accurately described as modification to the previously approved project, namely, the La Quinta Resort. 000366 17 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignafure Pool The objective of the proposed project is to increase visits to, and the use of the existing La Quinta Resort, during the off-peak summer season by adding a family - oriented amenity to complement the other features and facilities of the existing resort. The new pool complex is proposed in a 7.4-acre portion of the La Quinta Resort that presently contains existing recreational facilities, including an outdoor swimming pool and tennis courts. Specifically, this area presently contains nine existing tennis courts, the existing tennis stadium (center court), an existing restroom building, and an existing outdoor swimming pool. Existing surrounding facilities including the bar/restaurant, tennis/fitness clubhouse, and the Morgan House would not be modified as a part of the proposed project. As a part of the proposed project, the following components would be removed from the project site: the existing pool restroom/tennis pro office, library building, 10 tennis courts, child play structure, child splash pool, the modern garage facility and approximately 12 parking spaces. The proposed project would include several related water and pool -featured amenities. Proposed amenities include an arrival plaza, children's outdoor play area, a lazy river that proceeds in a circular loop, a formal outdoor pool with terraces, private pool -side cabanas, a game room with first aid center, outdoor dining terraces, splashdown pool for slides, a wave pool, chaise lounge deck, and secure gate entry points. All mechanical equipment to facilitate the filtration and flow of water for the aforementioned amenities would be housed in two separate artificial rock features that would be integrated in form and function into the proposed project. The southerly rock feature would also serve as the platform for water slides into the splashdown pool. The proposed structures would be similar in size and scale to the existing architecture in and around the project site. The Morgan House, which is located within the project site, would not be changed in any way by the proposed project. Also as a part of the proposed project, a raised median (10 feet wide and 50 feet long) with a turn -around area designed to facilitate the loading and unloading of hotel guests and club members would be constructed on Avenida Obregon, south of Avenida Fernando, to facilitate vehicle circulation in this part of the resort. The proposed pool complex would be open daily between Memorial Day and Labor Day from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM and on weekends the remainder of the year. In addition, the proposed project would be open daily during Thanksgiving week, from Christmas through New Year's Day, on Presidents' Day weekend, and for one to three weeks during spring. An underground system that would be located on site would accept backwash from the proposed water features, including pools and fountains. Every four days, the water from the features would be changed out through an underground pressurized 1 000367 18 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool line that would lead from inside one of the artificial rock formations to an underground storage tank, would filter sediments, oils, etc., and would then send the water to an underground percolation chamber. From there, the water would percolate into the ground per a soils engineer's testing and recommendations. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings North: Existing La Quinta Resort tennis villas South: Existing La Quinta Resort homes and the Existing La Quinta Resort Spa West: Existing La Quinta Resort tennis villas and tennis courts East: Avenida Obregon, further east are existing La Quinta Resort homes and the existing La Quinta Resort and Club facilities. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Riverside County Health Department - Pools and Food Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) — Water Use and Sewer ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities / Service Systems 1-1 Agriculture Resources Air Quality Cultural Resources Geology /Soils Hydrology / Water Land Use / Planning Quality Noise Population / Housing Recreation Transportation / Traffic Mandatory Findings of Significance 000368 19 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool 1 DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. X I find that the La Quinta Resort, with the Signature Pool addition, could have a significant effect on the environment. However, because all of the potentially significant effects have been analyzed earlier in the CEQA documents referenced in Section 1.0, and have been avoided or mitigated to the extent feasible pursuant to those earlier CEQA documents, including revisions or mitigations that were imposed upon the La Quinta Resort, nothing further is required. The addition of the Signature Pool facilities will not create the circumstances described in CEQA Guideline 15162(s) (1)-(3). Therefore, I find that no further CEQA documents are required in order to implement the proposed modifications to the La Quinta Resort. Signature: Douglas R. Evans, Community Development Director Date 00v?69 20 Addendum for the La Quintet Resort Signature Pool EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other i sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 21 006J f4) Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignahrce Pool 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; { however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a projecfs environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 22 Addendum for th La Quints Resort Signature Poor Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect X on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6) b) Substantially damage scenic X resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Aerial photograph) c) Substantially degrade the existing X visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial X light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) I. a) The proposed project would not result in any significant aesthetic impacts. Views of the Santa Rosa Mountains in the City of La Quinta are identified as scenic vista by the Citys General Plan. Due to the location of the project site and the existing structures on and adjacent to the site, the proposed project would not further block or limit visual access to existing scenic vistas. b.) There are no rock outcroppings or significant trees on the project site and the project site is not located adjacent to or near a scenic highway. The Morgan House structure has been determined to have potential historic significance, and is located within the project site. This structure was evaluated in a study by Architectural Resources Group on behalf of the City of La Quinta in June 2006. Please see Appendix A of this document for full copies of this study. The Morgan House would not be demolished, moved, or altered in any way as a part of the proposed project. The Morgan House structure would not be changed in any way as a part of the proposed project, and would remain consistent with its existing conditions. The modern garage near the Morgan House would be removed as a part of the proposed project. This garage was not a part of the original Morgan House as designed and constructed, and is not physically attached to the Morgan House. The removal of this garage has been j assessed and would not result in a potentially significant impact to the Morgan House as 23 Addendum for the La Quinta ResmtSignafure Pool significant impact to the Morgan House as a potentially historic resource. i In order to ensure the proper protection of the Morgan House during project construction and after project buildout, CNL Hotels, Inc. commissioned Telesis Engineers to prepare a report to include recommendations for proposed the protective fence around the Morgan House. This report is included in Appendix E of this Addendum. Based upon the findings and recommendations of the studies and consultation with the City, a series of best management practices (BMPs) and conditions of approval would be required of the construction contractor to ensure that no unintended adverse impacts may result to the historic structure as a result of the proposed project. These BMPs include, but are not limited to, fencing around the historic structure at ample distance to shield the structures from ground clearing, excavation, grading and construction activities related to the proposed project. Furthermore, the proposed project would include the following conditions of approval in order to ensure that potentially significant impacts would be avoided during project construction and after project buildout, during project operation: 1: A qualified Historic monitor shall be on -site during all project demolition or construction within 100' of the Morgan House that will create vibration or noise that may negatively affect it. The monitor shall be empowered to stop work if. he/she feels the building is being detrimentally affected. The Community Development Director shall be consulted if work is stopped. j 2: A final report on the monitoring shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the project. 3: The Morgan House security fence shall be 6' high and architecturally compatible to and appropriate for the building to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The location of the fence shall be approved by the Community Development and Building and Safety Department Directors prior to issuance of the first demolition or clearing permit. A temporary 6' high chain or metal fence shall be installed in the approved location prior to the beginning of demolition or clearing to ensure protection of the building and adjacent grounds. The Signature Pool site plan surrounding the Morgan -House shall be revised based on the approved location of the security fencing to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Building and Safety Department Directors. See V. Cultural Resources, below for more information on these project design features. Therefore, impacts on unique features, a scenic highways, and historic resources would not be significant. 24 Addendum for the La (zinta Resort Signatare Pool c.) The development of the proposed project includes the construction of a wave I ; pool, splashdown pool, formal pool, toddler -wading pool, a lazy river, and associated supporting facilities including a wave pool equipment room and a splash pool equipment room. The equipment would be housed in two artificial rock features designed to appear as a simulated rocky landscape and would include ornamental landscaping on and adjacent to the structures. The proposed artificial rock features would be designed to look like natural rock formations that are common in the desert context of the project site and would be finished with a realistic sculpted gunite rock veneer. Any water slides that would be included in the artificial rock features would be embedded within the features and not protruding off the features or constructed as freestanding structures. The two artificial rock features would be built side -by -side and would run lengthwise (north -south), directly adjacent and parallel to Calle Mazatlan on the western side of the project site. This deliberate placement of the artificial rock features would preclude them from being constructed directly in front of or adjacent to tennis villas or Resort homes, as the proposed buildings would reach a maximum height of 28 feet. The maximum height of existing two-story Resort tennis villas is approximately 22 feet, and the nearest that a Resort tennis villa located to the project site boundary is approximately 14 feet. The closest that the proposed artificial rock features would be located to a Resort tennis villa would be approximately 29 feet. Although the project site conditions would change as a result of the proposed project from red and green hard court tennis courts, with fencing and a small outdoor pool, to the proposed uses described above, the visual character of the site would not be ( I degraded as a result of the proposed project. Most views from the existing uses adjacent to the project site are limited due to existing buildings either on the project site or other residential and Resort structures directly across the project site. Furthermore, the uses proposed are consistent with the allowed uses in the Tourist Commercial Zone in the City of La Quinta General Plan and La Quinta Municipal Code. d.) The development of the Signature Pool and ancillary amenities would change the type and levels of existing lighting in this portion of the resort. The project site currently includes lighted tennis courts, courtyards, and walkways. The proposed pool complex will include landscaping and walkway lighting. This lighting will be less intensive than the existing tennis court lighting. All lighting will be designed to meet the standard in the City's Zoning Ordinance, which prohibits the spillage of lighting to adjacent properties. The type, location, and design of the new lighting in conformance with the City's standards will result in impacts associated with lighting being less than significant. The proposed project would not result in any new significant aesthetic impacts. 25 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Poo! C Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significantwi Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would theproject: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique X Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for X agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the X existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use? (General Plan Land Use Map) H. a}c) The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts on agricultural resources. The entire project site is currently fully developed, and no change would occur as a part of the proposed project that would alter or remove any existing or proposed agricultural resources. The 7.4 acres that comprise the project site are currently developed with recreational uses as a part of the La Quinta Resort, and no agricultural activity occurs on any of the parcels. The parcels are both designated and zoned for tourist development in the City's General Plan and Zoning maps. The land is not appropriate for agricultural activities, given its location on a major arterial, with urban development surrounding it. There are no Williamson Act contracts on the property. The proposed project does not seek to change the City s General Plan and Zoning designation for the project site of Tourist Commercial. All uses, as proposed, would be consistent with the existing General Plan and Zoning designation. No impacts associated with agricultural resources would result from the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts to agricultural resources. 000275 26 Addendum for Ste La Qrinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct X implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any air quality standard or X contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a cumulatively X considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2002 PM10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to X substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) e) Create objectionable odors X affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) III. a) -e) The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts in regards to air quality. The City of La Quinta uses the South Coast Air Quality Management (SCAQMD) Thresholds to determine air quality impacts. Therefore, all air quality analysis and modeling conducted used the SCAQMD standards and thresholds for determining the potential air quality impacts that could result from the proposed project in terms of construction and operation. All air quality modeling data and analysis is included in Appendix C. 00OS r8 27 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Poo[ Construction Table 1, Estimated Maximum Construction Equipment In Use Per Day, lists the maximum number and types of equipment that are expected to be used in any single day, per construction phase, during completion of the proposed project. The table is not a complete list of all equipment that is expected to be used during the course of construction of the entire proposed project — rather it is a list of the maximum number and types of equipment that will be in used in any single day. This was done in order to properly estimate the maximum daily emissions from construction -related activity due to the proposed project. Table 1 Estimated Maximum Construction Equipment in Use per Day Phase 1, Demolition Off Highway Truck (Water Truck) Rubber Tired Loader Tractor/Backhoe Haul Trucks Phase 2, Grading & Excavation Crawler Tractor Grader Off Highway Truck (Water Truck) Scraper Large Tractor/Backhoe Haul Trucks Phase 3, Fence Construction Tractor/Backhoe Source: Impact Sciences, Inc. 1 1 1 17 (round trips per day) 1 1 1 1 1 7 (round trips per day) 1 All equipment was assumed to operate for eight hours per day with the exception of the water trucks, which were assumed to operate for four hours per day. This is a reasonably conservative estimate since the SCAQMD recommends watering of disturbed unpaved surfaces three times daily. ( Table 2, Estimated Unmitigated Construction Emissions, compares the maximum daily emissions in this analysis with the SCAQMD significance thresholds. The 000377 28 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool maximum daily emissions for each pollutant listed below are considered not significant if (^ they are less than the SCAQMD thresholds. Table 2 Estimated Unmitigated Construction Emissions SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO Source: Impact Sciences, Inc. ' Assumes conformance with Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). VOC = volatile organic compounds; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SO2 = sulfur dioxide; PMfo = fine particulate matter This analysis calculates that the maximum daily unmitigated construction emissions due to the proposed project are not predicted to exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for any pollutant listed In Table 2. Based on the information above, the proposed project is considered not significant for construction -related emissions. The project, as proposed, includes a Construction Management Plan with the following construction management practices that will minimize temporary construction air emissions: 1. Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. 2. Provide temporary traffic controls, as needed, during all phases of construction activities to maintain traffic flow (e.g., flag person). 3. Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off- peak hours to the degree practicable. 4. Re-route construction trucks away from congested streets. 5. Consolidate truck deliveries when possible. 6 Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on and off site. 7. Maintain equipment and vehicle engines in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturers' specifications and per SCAQMD rules, to minimize exhaust emissions. 8. Suspend use of all construction equipment operations during second stage smog alerts. Contact the SCAQMD at 800/242-4022 for daily forecasts. 9. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel- or gasoline -powered generators. 000378 29 Addendum for the La Quints ResortSignature Pool 10. Use methanol- or natural gas -powered mobile equipment and pile drivers instead of diesel if readily available at competitive prices. 11. Use propane- or butane -powered on -site mobile equipment instead of gasoline if readily available at competitive prices. 12. Metal grates at construction site exits to remove dirt from truck wheels. 13. Periodic street cleaning along the haul route. Implementation of this Construction Management Plan would result in construction emissions remaining below the level of significance established by the SCAQMD. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not result in any significant air quality impacts. Operation Table 3, Estimated Unmitigated Operational Emissions, compares the maximum daily emissions in this analysis with the SCAQMD significance thresholds. The maximum daily emissions for each pollutant listed below are considered not significant if they are less than the SCAQMD thresholds. Table 3 Estimated Unmitigated Operation Emissions 43Z v IrfIM+EN}[� i'°tr[.f �T Ch3aaiS S i'� t Operation Emissions 21.35 20.80 137.40 0.07 10.82 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO Source: Impact Sciences, Inc. ' Assumes conformance with Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). This analysis calculates that the maximum daily unmitigated operational emissions due to the proposed project are not predicted to exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for any pollutant listed in Table 2. Operation and use of the project, therefore, would not result in any significant air quality impacts. 000379 01 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignature Pool To minimize air quality emissions, in compliance with AQMD standards, the project r i includes the following design features: 1. Use lighting controls and energy efficient lighting; 2. Require recycling bins in addition to trash bins and contract for recycling services; 3. Use light colored roof materials to reflect heat; 4. Use building materials that do not require use of paints and solvents. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new significant air quality impacts. 000380 31 Addendum for the La Quints Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would theproject: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, X either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA p. 72 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse effect X on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA p. 72 ff.) c) Have a substantial adverse effect X on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (General Plan MEA p. 72 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the X movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (General Plan MEA p. 72 ff.) 000381 32 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant wl Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact e) Conflict with any local policies or X ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (General Plan MEA p. 72 ff.) f) Conflict with the provisions of an X adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 72 ff.) IV. a)-f) The proposed project would not result in any impacts on biological resources. The entire project site is currently developed with ten tennis courts, a swimming pool, ancillary swimming pool structures and concrete walkways with metal fencing. There is { } no vacant or previously undisturbed land within the 7.4-acre project site. Also, the entire 7.4-acre site is entirely surrounded by existing development within the La Quinta Resort. The project site has been excavated and graded prior to the development that currently occupies the site. The vast majority of the project site currently consists of pavement and concrete. As such, there are no biological resources on or adjacent to the project site that could be adversely impacted by the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts to biological resources. 000382 33 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significantwi Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would theproject: a) Cause a substantial adverse X change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 115064.5? ("A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report...," L&L Environmental, December 2003) b) Cause a substantial adverse X change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? ("A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report...," L&L Environmental, December 2003) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a X unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (MEA Exhibit 5.9) d) Disturb any human remains, X including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report...," L& Environmental, December 2003) V. a)-d) The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts on cultural resources. The entire project site is currently developed with ten tennis courts, a swimming pool, ancillary swimming pool structures, and concrete walkways with metal fences. There is no vacant or previously undisturbed land within the 7.4-acre project site. The project site has been excavated and graded prior to the development that currently occupies the site. The vast majority of the project site currently consists of pavement and concrete. A pool used to occupy the area in which the stadium tennis court is currently located within the project site. Therefore, the removal of the stadium tennis court and 0003S3 34 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignature Poo[ r construction of the Signature Pool would revert the use on the site to what it was t j originally; a pool area. No paleontologic resources are expected to occur on the site. The Morgan House structure has been determined to have potential historic significance and is located within the project site. This structure was evaluated in a study by Architectural Resources Group on behalf of the City of La Quinta in June 2006. Please see Appendix A of this document for full copies of this study. This study provided the following description: Built in 1926-1927 to the designs of Gordon B. Kaufmann, the Morgan House was the residence of Walter Morgan, the founder and developer of the La Quinta Hotel. The two-story adobe structure is highly characteristic of the Monterey style of architecture popular in the 1920s. The Morgan House incorporates key elements of the style with adobe construction technologies carried out by local builders and craftsmen who fabricated materials under the direction of Morgan. The building remains in its original location; however, the immediate setting has been compromised by the development of the (La Quinta) Resort around it. The Morgan House would not be demolished, moved, or altered in any way as a part of - the proposed project. The Morgan House structure would be not be changed in any way as a part of the proposed project, and would be left intact, consistent with its existing conditions. The modern garage located near the Morgan House would be removed as a part of the proposed project. This modern garage was not a part of the original Morgan House as designed and constructed. The removal of this modern garage has been assessed in the ARG report included in Appendix A and would not result in a potentially significant impact to the Morgan House as a potentially historic resource. It is important to note that the modern garage is not the original garage for the Morgan House, which was subsequently converted into living space. That original garage, now converted, will remain in place. In order to ensure the proper protection and preservation of the Morgan House during project construction and after project buildout, CNL Hotels, Inc. commissioned Telesis Engineers to prepare a report to include recommendations for proposed the protective fence around the Morgan House. This report is included in Appendix E of this Addendum. Based upon the findings and recommendations of these two studies and consultation with the City, a series of BMPs and conditions of approval would be required of the construction contractor to ensure that no unintended adverse impacts may result to the historic structure as a result of the proposed project. These BMPs include, but are not limited to, fencing around the historic structure at ample distance to shield the structures from ground clearing, excavation, grading and construction activities related to the proposed project. Furthermore, the proposed project would include the following 000394 35 Addendum for Ste La Quinta Resort Signature Pool // include the following conditions of approval in order to ensure that potentially significant t_ impacts would be avoided during project construction and after project buildout, during project operation: 1: A qualified Historic monitor shall be on -site during all project demolition or construction within 100' of the Morgan House that will create vibration or noise that may negatively affect it. The monitor shall be empowered to stop work if he/she feels the building is being detrimentally affected. The Community Development Director shall be consulted if work is stopped. 2: A final report on the monitoring shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the project. 3: The Morgan House security fence shall be 6' high and architecturally compatible to and appropriate for the building to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Additionally, final fence design per the Telesis Engineering report included in Appendix E shall also be approved by the Director of the Department of Building and Safety. The location of the fence shall be approved by the Community Development and Building and Safety Department Directors prior to issuance of the first demolition or clearing permit. A temporary 6' high chain or metal fence shall be installed in the approved location prior to the beginning of demolition or clearing to ensure l _ protection of the building and adjacent grounds. The Signature Pool site plan surrounding the Morgan House shall be revised based on the approved location of the security fencing to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Building and Safety Department Directors. None of the parcels is known to have been a burial ground or cemetery. California law requires that any remains unearthed during grading be reported to law enforcement authorities, who follow a strict protocol for their recovery. These requirements of law will assure that impacts to human remains are less than significant. Therefore, in regards to cultural resources, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts to cultural resources. 00013S"I 36 Addendum for flee La Quints Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake X fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a know fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X (MEA Exhibit 6.2) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, X including liquefaction? (MEA Exhibit 6.3) iv) Landslides? (MEA Exhibit 6.4) X b) Result in substantial soil erosion 01 X the loss of topsoil? (MEA Exhibit 6.5) d) Be located on expansive soil, as X defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Building Code) e) Have soils incapable of a dequately X supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (General Plan EIR) oonss 37 Addendum for fire La Quinta Resort Signature Pool / VI. a)-e) No significant impact from geologic or soils conditions would occur. La Quinta could be subject to significant ground shaking in the event of an earthquake. The entire project site is currently developed with ten tennis courts, a swimming pool, ancillary swimming pool structures, and concrete walkways with metal fencing. There is no vacant or previously undisturbed land within the 7.4-acre project site. The project site has been excavated and graded prior to the development that currently occupies the site. The vast majority of the project site currently consists of pavement and concrete. The City of La Quinta reviews building plans using the latest provisions of the Uniform Building Code for seismically active areas. The plans are required to conform to these standards, thereby reducing impacts to less than significant levels. The project site is not subject to liquefaction, due to the depth to groundwater. The area is flat, and no landslide potential occurs. Development will be required to comply with City standards to prevent erosion during construction. Soils in the City of La Quinta are not expansive. The proposed project would include permanent perimeter fencing around the Morgan House structure to prevent any potential injury to pedestrians near the Morgan House, in the event of a significant ground shaking. Refer to Sections 1. Aesthetics and V. Cultural Resources for more information. No impacts associated with soils and geology are anticipated to as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, in regards to soils and geology, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously in the prior CEQA compliance documentation for the construction of previous modifications of the La Quinta Resort. 000387 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignatnre Pool Potentially ' Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS —Would theproject: a) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application materials) c) Emit hazardous emissions or X handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application materials) d) Be located on a site which is X included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an X airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within tw miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) Gonb'8 39 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Poo! Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or X physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Genera Plan MEA p. 95 ff) h) Expose people or structures to a X significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VII. a)-h) The proposed project would not result in impacts from hazards and hazardous materials. The project site is not located adjacent to or near an airport or private airstrip. Burtec Waste and Recycling Services is responsible for the appropriate disposal of the small amounts of hazardous waste generated and would do so during operation of the proposed project. The project site is not located in an area subject to wildland fires. Therefore, in regards to hazards and hazardous materials, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously in the prior CEQA compliance documentation for the construction of previous modifications of the La Quinta Resort. AN 00030a 40 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact VI IL HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would theproject: a) Violate any water quality standards X or waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater X supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff. c) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. 111-87 ff.) 41 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significantwi Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact e) Create or contribute runoff water X which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year X flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) g) Place within a 100-year flood X hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?, (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) VIII. a) & b) The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts on hydrology or water resources. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) currently provides water to project site. The CVWD has been provided with information about the proposed project and has been given the opportunity to provide input and feedback on the Site Development Permit for the proposed project (Site Development Permit 2006-865) s The CVWD requested to review plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems. This request will be facilitated as the final construction plans are completed. CVWD has prepared a Water Management Plan which indicates that it has sufficient water sources to accommodate changes in service in its service area. CVWD has implemented or is implementing water conservation, purchase, and replenishment measures which will result in a surplus of water in the long term. The proposed project includes plans to become fully integrated into CVWD's facilities and service lines, and would be constructed to meet all standards for this type of facility. The demand for water would not substantially increase as the proposed project does include the construction of new dwelling units in the form of hotel rooms, timeshare units, condominiums, or homes. After reviewing Site Development Permit materials for the proposed project, the CVWD ( } 3 Written Correspondence, Mark L. Johnson, PE, DEE, Director of Engineering, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). August4,2006_ 42 000391 Addendum for the La Qtinta Resort Signature Pool proposed project, the CVWD has indicated that it would "furnish domestic water and ( sanitation service to this area in accordance with current regulations of the District.'"t The City will require compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards, requiring that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters, and that storm flows be controlled within a project site. These City standards will assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than significant. VIII. c) & d) The development included as apart of the proposed project would not alter hydrological conditions of the project site to create new features that could lead to potentially significant impacts. The City requires that all projects retain the 100-year storm on site. Compliance with City and CVWD standards will assure that impacts due to development associated with hydrology will be less than significant. Vill. e)-g) According to the CVWD, the area in which the project site is located "is protected from regional stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from regional stormwater flows except in rare instances." Furthermore, the CVWD has indicated that "since the stormwater issues of [the proposed] development are local drainage, the [Coachella Valley Water] District does not need to review the drainage designs further." The area in which the project site is located is designated as Zone X on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps as provided by ( ) the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The project site is not at a high risk of flooding. As described above, an underground system that would be located on site would accept backwash from the proposed water features, including pools and fountains. Every four days, the water from the features would be changed out through an underground pressurized line that would lead from inside one of the artificial rock formations to an underground storage tank, would filter sediments, oils, etc., and would then send the water to an underground percolation chamber. From there, the water would percolate into the ground per a soils engineer's testing and recommendations. This system would be used in ensure that drainage would be facilitated on site without impacting off site and adjacent areas. Furthermore, in accordance with a request from CVWD, plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems will be submitted to the CVWD for review to ensure efficient water management 6 Therefore, in regards to hydrology and water quality, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe 4 Ibid. f 5 Ibid. 6 Ibid. OW92 43 Addendum for the La {bunts ResortSignature Poo[ than assessed previously in the prior CEQA compliance documentation for the t \� construction of previous modifications of the La Quinta Resort. 000113 UJ Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established X community? (Aerial photo) b) Conflict with any applicable land X use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding o mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 74 ff.) IX. a)-c) The proposed project would not result in any impacts on land use and planning. The proposed project would redevelop a site with existing recreational uses with new recreational uses. The adjacent residential uses to the north, west, and east of the project site would not be obstructed or divided any more than they are already separated by existing recreational uses on the project site. The existing recreational uses on the project site include pool, tennis, and children's play areas, the proposed project would include similar uses in the same area. The proposed project would comply with all City General Plan, Zoning, and Land Use designations for the project site (and/or as modified by previously approved Specific Plans and Specific Plan Amendments for the Resort), as well as the City's Municipal Code requirements for the Tourist Commercial designation. The proposed project site is designated Recreation in the approved Specific Plan for the La Quinta Resort. The project site is included within a specific plan area for the entire La Quinta Resort that was first implemented and approved in 1975. A series of specific plan amendments j have been approved and implemented subsequently. The project site is designated to 45 " 394 Addendum far the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool designated to include recreational uses in accordance with the specific plan. These uses l include but are not limited to pools, children's play areas, and tennis courts. The existing and proposed uses are consistent with the recreational specific plan designation. Conditions included in the specific plan call for new development to be reviewed and approved by the City through the site development permit process. The City of La Quinta has determined that the proposed project requires a Site Development Permit for approval and the proposed uses contained in the proposed project are consistent with the existing adopted specific plan for the project site. The Signature Pool has been submitted to the City for review as Site Development Permit 2006-865. Additionally, the proposed project would not conflict with the habitat conservation plan as the site is already developed and surrounding by existing Resort development. The project site is not identified as a "conservation area" in the draft Coachella Valley Multi - Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Therefore, in regards to land use and planning, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously in the prior CEQA compliance documentation for the construction of previous modifications of the La Quinta Resort. 000305 46 Addendum fm the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significantwi Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a X known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a X locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) X. a) & b) The proposed project would not result in any impacts on mineral resources. The project site is not located within a mineral zone with potential for mineral resources. The entire project site is currently developed with ten tennis courts, a swimming pool, ancillary swimming pool structures, and concrete walkways with metal fencing. There is no vacant or previously undisturbed land within the 7.4-acre project site. The project site has been excavated and graded prior to the development that currently occupies the site. The vast majority of the project site currently consists of pavement and concrete. Therefore, in regards to mineral resources, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously in the prior CEQA compliance documentation for the construction of previous modifications of the La Quinta Resort. 00039E 47 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignadae Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or X generation of noise levels in excess o standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or X generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) c) A substantial permanent increase ir X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) d) A substantial temporary or periodic X increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EI p. III-144 ff.) e) For a project located within an X airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) 000391 48 Addendum for the La 0iintu Resort Signature Pool pp XI. a)-f) Noise levels are generally considered low when they are below 45 dB(A), moderate in the 45 to 60 dB(A) range, and high above 60 dB(A). Although people often accept the higher levels associated with very noisy urban residential and residential - commercial zones (above 60 dB(A)), as well as industrial areas (65 to 70 dB(A)), they nevertheless are considered adverse noise levels. Lower noise levels are more expected in rural or suburban areas than in commercial or industrial zones. Nighttime ambient levels in urban environments are approximately 7 dB(A) lower than the corresponding average daytime levels. The day -to -night difference can be less in rural areas away from roads and other human activity. Areas with full-time human occupation that are subject to nighttime noise that does not decrease relative to daytime levels, are often considered objectionable. Noise levels above 45 dB(A) at night can result in sleep disturbance. The normal range of conversation is between 34 and 66 dB(A). Between 70 and 90 dB(A), sound is distracting and presents an obstacle to conversation, thinking, or learning. Above 90 dB(A), sound can cause permanent hearing loss. In general, a difference of more than 3 dB(A) is a perceptible change in environmental noise, while a 5 dB(A) difference typically causes a change in community reaction. An increase of 10 dB(A) is perceived by people as a doubling of loudness.' Noise from any source will naturally decline as the noise radiates outward over increasing distances. As a rule of thumb, for a stationary source of noise, the noise level { is reduced by at least 6 dB(A) for each doubling of distance. Other factors, such as the weather and reflecting or shielding, also help intensify or reduce noise levels at any given location. Noise levels may also be reduced by intervening structures. Generally, a single row of buildings between the receptor and the noise source reduces the noise level b� about 5 dB(A). Solid walls and berms may reduce noise levels by 5 to 10 dB(A). Exterior noise levels can normall� be reduced by 15 dB(A) inside buildings constructed with no special noise insulation. Noise from traffic on roads depends on the volume and speed of traffic and the distance of the noise receptor from the traffic. A commonly used rule of thumb is that for every doubling of distance from the road, atmospheric spreading results in a reduction in the noise level by about 3 to 4.5 dB(A). Furthermore, because of the logarithmic nature of the decibel scale, a doubling of traffic on any given roadway would cause a noise increase of approximately 3 dB(A). In order to reduce noise due to construction, the construction contractor will be required to keep properly functioning mufflers on all internal combustion engines and vehicle engines used in construction. The table below shows noise levels associated with various types of construction -related machinery. According to this table, noise levels as 7 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 1974. Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. March. e U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Noise Mitigation, (Springfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, September 1980), p. 18. e U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), 1985. Noise Guidebook. 49 0001118 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignatnre Pool high as 83 dB(A) could be experienced by sensitive receptors at distances of 50 feet from equipment using mufflers or other noise -reducing features. Demolition and Construction Equipment Source Noise Levels Air Compressor 81 71 Backhoe 85 80 Concrete Pump 82 80 Concrete Vibrator 76 70 Concrete Breaker 82 75 Truck Crane 88 80 Dozer 87 83 Generator 78 71 Loader 84 80 Paver 88 80 Pneumatic Tools 85 75 Water Pump 76 71 Power Hand Saw 78 70 Shovel 82 80 Trucks 88 1 83 a. Quieted equipment can be designed with enclosures, mufflers, or other noise -reducing features. Source: Bolt Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, USDOT Federal Transit Administration, 1995. Temporary increases in noise due to construction activities could occur for limited periods of time during demolition, excavation, grading, and construction of the new pools and related site improvements. As in previous CEQA documentation for the La Quinta Resort, conditions of approval would be required in order to reduce potentially significant temporary noise impacts due to demolition, excavation, grading, and construction to a level of less than significant. Those conditions included in previous documents are: 1: All construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the City of La Quinta Municipal Code and Noise Ordinance. 2: Construction staging areas shall be located as far from existing residential development as possible. An acoustics study prepared by Veneklasen & Associates in January 2007 evaluated the potential increase in noise that would occur from use of the new pool facilities and from the new mechanical equipment, such as pumps and filters required for the new pools. This study is provided in Appendix D. 000399 50 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool The study found that there would be a minimal increase in noise generation from adult J and children users of the Signature Pool on an intermittent basis, as compared to the intermittent use of the 10 tennis courts proposed for removal. The maximum estimated increase from ambient levels, to with -project conditions, was 6 decibels at the edge of the project site, near residential uses located directly adjacent to the project site. This increase would be noticeable to the human ear, but not significant. The closest Resort tennis villa is located approximately 29 feet from where the artificial rock feature would be located as a part of the proposed project. The project site boundary is approximately 14 feet away from the closest Resort tennis villa. The study found that operational noise generated by occupants of the proposed project would still be well below the threshold standards of the City of La Quinta Noise Ordinance, and would not be significant. The City of La Quinta Municipal Code has the following noise limits: "It is unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, when such noise causes the noise level, when measured on any adjacent property to exceed: 1. The noise standard for a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour, 2. The noise standard plus five dB(A) for a cumulative period of more then fifteen minutes in any hour, 3. The noise standard plus ten dB(A) for a cumulative period of more then five minutes in any hour, 4. The noise standard plus fifteen dB(A) for a cumulative period of more then one minute in any hour, or 5. The noise standard plus twenty dB(A) for any period of time. The Exterior Noise Standard for residential property lines is documented as 60 dB(A) during the expected hours of operation for the pool area. Thus, the activities within the pool area cannot exceed 60 dB(A). Short duration events cannot exceed 80 dB(A) at the closest property line. The Veneklasen Acoustic Study found that the operation of the proposed project would not exceed these significance thresholds standards. The study found that the increase in noise due to the proposed project's mechanical equipment would be immeasurable, or less than a single decibel. This is due to the design of the proposed project, which calls for all required above -ground mechanical equipment to be housed in insulated artificial rock features. The study also found that operational mechanical noise would be well below the standards of the City of La Quinta Noise Ordinance. Due to the fact that the mechanical equipment in the proposed project would be expected to be continuously operating during business, or daylight hours, the first point of the City's Noise Ordinance applies to the proposed project. ,T 000400 51 Addendum for the La Quinta ResortSignafure Pool Furthermore, the acoustics study found that there would be no significant increase in noise levels, as compared to ambient levels, independent of the City's Noise Ordinance. The Exterior Noise Standard for residential property lines is set at 60 dB(A) during the expected hour of operation for the pool area. Thus the mechanical equipment cannot exceed 60 dB(A) at the closest property line. The Veneklasen Acoustic Study found that the mechanical equipment required for operation of the proposed project would not exceed these significance thresholds standards. The isolated noise projected to occur as a result of proposed mechanical equipment was found to be negligible. The project site is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip or airport. Existing City standards and requirements, therefore, will assure that all potentially significant impacts associated with noise will be less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measures outlined above. Furthermore, the proposed project has been designed to limit the amount of noise generated, as well as limiting the degree to which noise generated by the proposed project could have an impact on existing adjacent uses. Examples of these design considerations include providing two artificial rock features to store all mechanical equipment above ground in order to avoid ground vibrations and exterior mechanical noise. The placement of these artificial rock features in the proposed project design keeps them as far away from adjacent residential and Resort uses as possible, further limited mechanical noise impacts on adjacent uses. Operational noise is buffered by designing the pools and lazy river in a manner that takes advantage of site topography that would keep noise low to the ground, and within the project site boundaries, as much as possible. The closest Resort tennis villa is located approximately 29 feet from where the artificial rock feature would be located as a part of the proposed project. These are some of the design considerations of the proposed project that would further limit potential noise impacts. Nighttime noise as a result of the Signature Pool would be negligible as the primary noise source from the proposed project would be occupancy noise, and the Signature Pool would only operate during daylight hours. As stated previously, due to the housing of mechanical equipment in insulated artificial rock features, mechanical noise from the Signature Pool would be negligible. Therefore, in regards to noise, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously in the prior CEQA compliance documentation for the construction of previous modifications of the La Quinta Resort. 000401 52 Addendum for lie La Quinta Resort Signafure Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population X growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of X existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of X people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) XI I. a)-c) The proposed project would not result in any impacts on population and housing. The proposed project does not include the removal of any existing housing units and does not propose the construction of any new housing units. As a result, no existing population would be displaced, and no new population would be introduced or encouraged as a result of the proposed project. The new amenities that would be constructed as a part of the proposed project would only serve La Quinta Resort residents, members, and visitors staying at the Resort's hotel. Daily passes to the Signature Pool would not be available to the general public. No impacts are anticipated in regards to population and housing as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, in regards to population and housing, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously, in prior CEQA compliance documents for the La Quinta Resort. 53 Addendum for die La Quinta Resort Signature Poo[, Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significantwi Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, X p. 57) Police protection? (General Plan X MEA, p. 57) Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 X ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and X Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan X MEA, p. 46 ff.) All. a) The proposed project would not result in any impacts on public services. The proposed project would comply with all City and County requirements related to the payment of mitigation and developer fees for public services, as required by law. The proposed project does not include the removal of any existing housing units and does not propose the construction of any new housing units. As a result, no existing population would be displaced, and no new population would be introduced or encouraged as a result of the proposed project. The area in which the project site is located is already served by Riverside County Sheriff and Fire Departments, on contract to the City. Under current conditions, impacts to public safety would remain the same. 000403 54 Addendum for the La Qtinta Resort Signature Pool Total capacity of the Resort and Club hotel rooms and rental condominiums would not i increase as a part of the proposed project; therefore, the maximum number of calls for service would not increase from current conditions, so no significant impact is anticipated. Therefore, in regards to public services, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously, in prior CEQA compliance documents for the La Quinta Resort. 55 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XIV. RECREATION — a) Would the project increase the use X of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occu or be accelerated? (Application materials) b) Does the project include X recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might hav an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application materials) XIV. a) & b) The proposed project would not result in any significant impacts in regards to recreational facilities. The recreational uses currently offered on the project site are not open to the general public. Rather, they are only available for use by La Quinta Resort Hotel visitors, and La Quinta Resort Club members and their immediate families (i.e., children under the age of 23 years). The proposed recreational uses would also be restricted for use by individuals with access to the recreational uses on the project site currently. Furthermore, although the proposed project would remove a total of 10 existing outdoor hard court tennis courts, there are proposed plans to expand existing tennis facilities in the City of La Quinta for Resort Club members. No significant impacts on recreation are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, in regards to recreation, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously, in the prior CEQA compliance documents for the La Quinta Resort. 3M Addendum for the La Quints ResortSignahrre Poo[ Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which X is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or X cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. 111-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic X patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards due X to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Tentative Tract Map 31087) e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? (Tentative Tract Map 31087) f) Result in inadequate parking X capacity? (Tentative Tract Map 31087) 57 0 0'W') Addendum for &e La Q infa Resort Signature Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant wl Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact g) Conflict with adopted policies, X plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project description) XV. arg) The proposed project would not result in any significant traffic and circulation impacts. A Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed project was prepared by Endo Engineering in November 2006 and is provided in Appendix B. This Analysis found that the average monthly occupancy rate at the La Quinta Resort is substantially lower during the summer months (Memorial Day through Labor Day) and during the December holiday season. During the summer months, traffic volumes on the streets of La Quinta are substantially lower than the traffic volumes during the peak seasons of winter and spring. The proposed project is designed to provide a private ancillary recreational amenity for use of the guests and members of the La Quinta Resort and would not be open to the general public. Use of the facilities included in the proposed project will be limited to La Quinta Resort Hotel guests and La Quinta Resort Club Members, and their immediate family members. Therefore, there is currently sufficient capacity on the existing street infrastructure to handle an incremental increase in trips to and from the Resort during the summer off-season months. The proposed project does not include the removal of any existing housing units and does not propose the construction of any new housing units. As a result, no existing population would be displaced, and no new population would be introduced or encouraged as a result of the proposed project. For the most part, the number of occupied guest rooms would determine the number of trips generated by the Resort and also establish the demand for off-street hotel parking. Therefore, the proposed project itself would not increase demand for parking at the Resort as the proposed project does not include the addition of any dwelling units in the form of hotel rooms, timeshare units, condominiums, or homes. To minimize the potential for the parking accumulation to overflow the available parking supply on -site on peak days in the future, the La Quinta Resort would require that club members and hotel guests not park in the adjacent neighborhood. To control parking along Avenida Obregon, a parking management program would be included as a part of the proposed project which would require parking permits and would be enforced through the ticketing of violators and the towing of vehicles parked without a permit. Permits would be issued to hotel guests and club members at the front desk of the hotel. Only if 58 000407 Addendum far the La Quinth Resort Signature Poo[ hotel. Only if the number of club members visiting the Signature Pool were to exceed the number of available parking spaces on Avenida Obregon, club members would not be issued Avenida Obregon parking permits. Currently, associates employed at the La Quinta Resort park off site at the Tampico Parking lot. At times when the Resort has a lower occupancy, in the summer months for instance, associates are allowed to park on site. This is controlled by the Resort's Loss Prevention Department which administers parking restrictions within the Resort based on the levels of occupancy and use at the Resort. There are shuttles that operate on the Resort property that are dedicated to shuttling Resort associates to and from off -site parking as well as guest shuttles dedicated to shuttling Resort guests around the Resort property and to gold courses and other local venues. With the operation of the Signature Pool feature, the Resort would revert to the high season parking plan and require associates and guests to parking in a similar manner to that which is implemented during high season months. As a part of the proposed project, along Avenida Obregon, south of Avenida Fernando, a raised median (10 feet wide and 50 feet long) with a turn -around area designed to facilitate the loading and unloading of hotel guests and club members using the Signature Pool would be constructed to control the flow of traffic near the proposed project. Additionally, during peak use period, a parking control attendant will be stationed at the Signature Pool entry to ensure that pool traffic does not enter Avenida Oregon. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any circulation or hazard impacts due to a design feature or incompatible use. The following components would be included as a part of the proposed project to address temporary conditions related to project construction. The construction specifications of the proposed project would include a requirement that construction - related parking would not be permitted along Avenida Fernando and would occur only in designated construction staging areas. In the event that additional space would be needed as a back-up/overflow construction staging area, it would be provided at a designated location to ensure that construction vehicles do not park along Avenida Fernando. Temporary construction parking would be located in the Palm Grove lot and on spaces immediately surrounding the construction site. As a part of the proposed project, approximately 12 parking spaces would be removed to provide the half -circle drop off area and security gate for users of the Signature Pool. During periods when parking for the Signature Pool would be required in the main lot as overflow parking, a shuttle or golf cart transportation would be made available to hotel guests and club members. Appropriate signage would be provided, clearly indicating that parking along Avenida Obregon would be by permit only for condominium owners and hotel guests whose hotel rooms are adjacent to Avenida Obregon. A designated passenger loading zone would be provided along Avenida Obregon, near the Signature Pool entry, where children going to and from the Signature Pool could \be 59 QDri1C8 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool safely dropped off and picked up by their families. This zone would also serve as a shuttle drop and loading point. Since the main parking lot for the hotel is located approximately 1,000 feet from the Signature Pool, signage would be provided to clearly identify the path to be used between the main parking lot and the Signature Pool. If required, employees of the Resort may be asked to utilize additional off -site parking to be provided at a remote location which is accessible by shuttle and golf carts. If demand requires Avenida Obregon to be gated, gates would be installed across Avenida Obregon (south of Avenida Fernando) and at the proposed turn around area. Therefore, in regards to transportation and traffic, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously, in the prior CEQA compliance documents for the La Quinta Resort. 000401 Ell Addendum for die La Odnffi ResmtSignalure Pool Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment X requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction X of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction X of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Have sufficient water supplies X available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff. e) Result in a determination by the X wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project=s projected demand in addition to the provider-s existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) 000410 61 Addendum far the La fbrinin Resort Signature Pool Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significantwi Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact f) Be served by a landfill with sufficieni X permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) g) Comply with federal, state, and X local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) XVI. a}g) The proposed project would not result in any impacts on public utilities. Water supplies have been found adequate in CVWD's Urban Water Management Plan (please see Hydrology and Water Resources, above). CVWD Vol also provide sanitary sewer services to the sites, and has sufficient capacity to serve the entire project site and the proposed uses. After reviewing Site Development Permit materials for the proposed project, the CVWD has indicated that it would "furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with current regulations of the District."10 The City's solid waste franchisee will service the proposed project, and haul waste to the transfer station at Edom Hill. From this location, solid waste will be transferred to one of several regional landfills for disposal. Therefore, in regards to utilities and service systems, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously, in prior CEQA compliance documentation for the La Quinta Resort. i 10 Written Correspondence, Mark L. Johnson, PE, DEE, Director of Engineering, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). August4,2006. 000411 62 Addendum for ibe La Quintu Resort Signature Pool () Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — a) Does the project have the potential X to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential X to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that X are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have X environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 63 000411 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool XVII. a) The proposed project would not have any impact on biological or cultural j resources. XVII. b) The proposed project would further the City's goals of providing a tourist commercial amenities to current and future residents of the City, as well as guests of the La Quinta Resort. The uses proposed are consistent with the allowed uses under the Tourist Commercial Zone designation in the City of La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Code. XVII. c) The proposed project would not contribute to any significant cumulative impacts analyzed in the City s General Plan EIR were associated with regional air quality. The City found that the ultimate development of the General Plan overrode the potential impacts associated with air quality. As shown under the air quality discussion above, the redevelopment of the project site would not significantly impact air quality. XVII. d) The proposed project would not have any adverse impacts on human beings. Therefore, in regards to mandatory findings of significance, the proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts, or any impacts that are substantially more severe than assessed previously, in the prior CEQA compliance documentation for the La Quinta Resort. 64 00041.1 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Poo[ XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. - Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: l� a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. The La Quinta Resort has a long history of site development, expansion, redevelopment and corresponding CEQA documentation. In order to provide a clear and all-inclusive review of the proposed project in the context of the development and redevelopment of the La Quinta Resort, the collective CEQA record was reviewed in order to analyze the proposed project in a context consistent with the findings of previous CEQA documents about development at the Resort. The following table provides a chronological summary of the development history and corresponding CEQA documentation for the La Quinta Resort that used to prepare this Addendum: Environmental Document(s) and Name Date Description Resolutions SP 121-E La Quinta Cove Golf Club EIR No. 41 411975 637 condos; 496 hotel rooms, golf course, clubhouse and service facility SP 121-E Change of zone #3491 and Neg. EA #15145/Neg. Dec. Revised Dec. for EA 15145 10/5/82 Addition of 279 condos and 146 (La Quinta City hotel rooms Council Resolution (916 condos total and 642 hotel 82-54) rooms) SP 121-E Change of zone Add 2.1 acres of EA #88-095/Neg. Revised #88-031 land to Santa Dec.; impacts same Amendment Rosa as those for SP 121-E No. 1 Tentative Parcel development for Revised 9l20/19$8 Map #23749 overflow parking and City Council Plot Plan #88- maintenance Resolution 88-112 393 building EA 15145/Neg. Dec. 65 000414 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool t ) Environmental Document(s) and Name Date Description Resolutions SP 121-E Description EA 89-141/Neg. Dec. Revised Amendment Removal of championship tennis City Council No. 2 court, small tennis club building, Resolution 89-124 11/21/1989 several adjacent parking spaces and construct a two-story 43,065 sq. ft. hotel addition + 44 new parking spaces Plot Plan #89-421 Tentative Tract 3/20/1990 Tentative Tract No. 25237 a Initial Study No. 25237; re: re -subdivision Resubdivision of Tracts 14496-6 a EA # 89-146/Neg. of Tracts and 14496-7 consisting of 26.81 Dec. 14496-6 and acres into 54 single-family lots; City Council 14496-7 avg. 15,500 sq. ft. Resolution 90-23 [These lots were zoned for 127 condos under SP 121-E] SP 121-E 16,000 sq. ft. ballroom and sub- City Council Revised level parking garage Resolution 95-56 Amendment Plot Plan 95-555 (Amendment to No. 3 Specific Plan) 7/5l1995 City Council Resolution 95-55 (for mitigated Neg. Dec. for EA No. 95-304) 000411 Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool C) Name Date Description Environmental Document(s) and Resolutions SP 121-E GPA 97-054 Residential EA No. 97-340; Revised Change of Zone Units: 119 mitigated Neg. Dec. Amendment No. 4 97-083 Spa Initial Study TTM 28545 Fitness Center Addendum for EA No.97-340 Site Development Planning Commission Permit No. 97-607 Employee Resolution No. 97-04 parking lot: (Amend. No. 4) 244 spaces Site Development Planning Commission Permit No. 97-608 Resolution No. 97-04 (TTM 28545) Certificate of Planning Commission 9/16/97 Appropriateness No. 97-003 Resolution No. 97-04 (development permit) Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-04 (development permit) City Council Resolution 97-74 (Amend. No. 4) City Council Resolution 97-72 (EA and mitigated Neg. Dec.) 000410 67 Addendum for die La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Name Date Description Environmental Document(s) and Resolutions SP-121E • TTM No. 30125 (subdivision of Planning Commission Revised 17.82 acres into 65 lots) Resolution 2001-080 Amendment . Addendum to EIR No. 41 (EIR Addendum) No. 5 (5/8/01) • GPA 2001-078 • Change of zone 2001-101 Planning Commission Resolution 2001-081 • Specific Plan Amend. No. 5 (GPA) (5/22/01) • Site Development Permit ("SDP') 2001-703 Planning Commission Resolution 2001-085 (TTM) (5/22/01) 6/19/2001 Planning Commission (date of Resolution 2001-083 City's (Amend. No. 5) adopting (5/22/01) resolutions) Planning Commission Resolution 2001-084 (SDP) (5/22/01) Planning Commission Resolution 2001-082 (ZC 2001-101) (5/22/01) City Council Resolution 2001-83 (EIR Amendment; GPA; Zone Change; Amend No. 5; and SDP) 00041`7 68 Addendum fm 6,e La Quinia ResortSignalure Pool OTHER DOCUMENTS OF INTEREST: �} • La Quinta General Plan; • EIR for La Quinta General Plan; • Relied upon by Amendment NO.4 to SP 121-E Revised • La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment • Voluminous "neighbor complaints7opposition letters with regards to Amendment No. 4 • May 1997 Noise Study for La Quinta Resort Maintenance Facility; J. J. Van Houter & Assoc., Inc. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. All environmental topics required to be reviewed for potential impacts by CEQA had been adequately addressed in the aforementioned CEQA documentation listed in the table above. These topics include aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils, hazards & hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, land use/planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities/service systems. The proposed project has been assessed for potential impacts due to project construction .) and operation in the all of the aforementioned environmental topics in a manner that is consistent with the collective record of CEQA documentation for the La Quinta Resort. c) Mitigation measures. As no new or substantially more severe significant impacts were identified, as compared to those previously discussed in prior CEQA compliance documentation for the La Quinta Resort, no new mitigation measures are recommended or required. Conditions of Approval The following conditions of approval would be required in order to ensure that potentially significant impacts would be avoided during project construction and after project buildout: A qualified Historic monitor shall be on -site during all project demolition or construction within 100' of the Morgan House that will create vibration or noise that may negatively affect it. The monitor shall be empowered to stop work if he/she feels the building is being detrimentally affected. The Community Development Director shall be consulted if work is stopped. 2: A final report on the monitoring shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the Certificate of �) Occupancy for the project. OOOs18 19 Addendum for the La Quintu ResortSignahire Pool L J 3: The Morgan House security fence shall be 6' high and architecturally compatible to and appropriate for the building to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. At a minimum, the fence shall be setback a distance at least five feet more than the height of the adjacent building wall. The location of the fence shall be approved by the Community Development and Building and Safety Department Directors prior to issuance of the first demolition or clearing permit. A temporary 6' high chain or metal fence shall be installed in the approved location prior to the beginning of demolition or clearing to ensure protection of the building and adjacent grounds. The Signature Pool site plan surrounding the Morgan House shall be revised based on the approved location of the security fencing to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Building and Safety Department Directors. Temporary increases in noise due to construction activities could occur for limited periods of time during demolition, excavation, grading, and construction of the new pools and related site improvements. As in previous CEQA documentation for the La Quinta Resort, conditions of approval would be required in order to reduce potentially significant temporary noise impacts due to demolition, excavation, grading, and construction to a level of less than significant. Those conditions included in previous documents are: 1: All construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the City of La Quinta Municipal Code and Noise Ordinance. 2: Construction staging areas shall be located as far from existing residential development as possible. In order to avoid significant impacts in regards to traffic and circulation, the City of La Quinta shall require an on -going monitoring of traffic and circulation conditions at and adjacent to the La Quinta Resort. If said monitoring results in potential traffic and circulation impacts being identified, measures to alleviate traffic and circulation impacts may be required at the discretion of the City of La Quinta Community Development Director and Department of Public Works Director, at cost of the La Quinta Resort. Conclusions Through the Applicant's community outreach efforts, including community study sessions, the Applicant determined that supplemental technical studies should be prepared to address historic resources on and adjacent to the project site, traffic circulation, and noise issues raised by nearby residents. Five studies commissioned in response to these concerns are appended to this document were used in preparation of the analysis in regards to Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Transportation/Traffic and Noise. Please see Appendices A, B, C, D, and E. 70 000419 Addendum forlhe La Quinta ResoitSignature Pool All environmental topics required for assessment under CEQA were analyzed in this Addendum, in Section 2.0, Environmental Analysis. No new or substantially more severe impacts are anticipated to occur as a result of the construction or operation of the proposed project. All potential impacts identified in this Addendum are either equal to, or of lesser severity than the potential impacts identified in previously adopted CEQA compliance documentation for the La Quinta Resort. 000420 71 APPENDIX A Historic Resources Evaluation (2006) d00V1 rz �e ;� � } _;�'�� EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT 1 1 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA \_ _J JUNE2006 Introduction II. Executive Summary III. Methodology IV. Eligibility Criteria for Historic Resources V. Historical Background — Development of La Quinta Hotel VI. Morgan House A. Description and Historical Background B. Building Alterations C. Character -Defining Features D. Evaluation of Integrity E. Structural Considerations VIi. Casa Magnolia A. Description and Historical Background B. Building Alterations C. Character -Defining Features E. Evaluation of Integrity F. Structural Considerations VIII. Conclusion Regarding Eligibility IX. Recommendations Regarding Future Use X. Bibliography Appendices Appendix A - Photographs of the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia. Appendix B - State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 523 (DPRs) for the Walter Morgan House completed by Mellon and Associates, dated September 19, 1997. Appendix C - State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 523 (DPRs) for La Casa completed by Mellon and Associates, dated September 20, 1997. Appendix D - Stow -Fithian, Anne. "At the Very Edge of the Desert" in Home and Field. Volume 42. February, 1932. j ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 000423 _ _J Amhirwm, Planners F7 Colnuva[ors, hn . EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA Qu1NTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 1. INTRODUCTION In response to a request from the City of La Quinta, Architectural Resources Group (ARG) has developed the following report to evaluate two adobe structures, the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia, at the La Quinta Resort in La Quinta, California. This report presents our findings concerning the status of the buildings as potentiat historical resources, as well as our evaluation of the structural conditions of both buildings. ARG has reviewed the buildings for potential eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources using the standard criteria for evaluation, which is based on the National Register criteria. Historical properties are defined as those that meet the criteria for the National Register or the California Register of Historical Places. For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a historical resource includes resources listed on, or determined eligible for listing on, the California Register of Historical Resources. We have used the historical name of'Casa Magnolia' to refer to the complex of structures presently known as 'La Casa.' The complex consists of two independent structures flanking a central courtyard, and it includes individual meeting rooms known as the Cactus Room, La Sala, and El Laibred. If. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report will focus on the historical significance of the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia. It will also analyze the existing structural system of each building and identify requirements for seismic ' strengthening. Built in 1926-27 to the designs of architect Gordon B. Kaufmann, the Morgan House was the residence of Walter Morgan, the founder and developer of La Quinta Hotel. The two-story adobe structure is highly characteristic of the Monterey style of architecture popular in California in the 1920s. The Morgan House incorporates key elements of the style with adobe construction technologies carried out by local builders and craftsmen who fabricated materials under the direction of Morgan' The building remains in its original location; however, the immediate setting has been compromised by the development of the resort around it. Built circa 1927 to the designs of architect Gordon 8. Kaufmann as one Of six privately owned dwellings on the grounds of the La Quinta Hotel, Casa Magnolia was the residence of Mrs. Lee Eleanor Graham, a Southern California socialite and wife of one of California's wealthiest oil barons at the time, William Miller Graham. The adobe house consists of two separate structures flanking the north and south sides Of a central courtyard, as well as an outlying garage. The style of Casa Magnolia is eclectic, relying on a Spanish Colonial or Mission vocabulary. The house remains in its original location, but its original setting on the edge of the desert has been lost as the hotel has expanded around it. Both the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia share many similarities in terms of siting, construction techniques, use, and relationship to La Quinta Resort. Both structures were sited to complement the desert landscape and the region's climate. At a time when the Coachella Valley was considered remote, they utilized local materials, such as adobe bricks fabricated on site. They fit into a pattern of development that led to the evolution of the Southern California desert resort and lifestyle of the 1920s. Both were privately owned residences from the 1920s until the early 1980s, when they were purchased by the Landmark Land Company and incorporated into the La Quinta Resort After incorporation into the resort, both the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia were used for office and meeting space. Today, Mellon and Associates, Historic Resource Evaluation,1997. p.1. } ARCHCIECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP �-� Archi[ais, Planners (� Conservarnrs, Inc. 000424 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia are generally not open to the public due to concerns about the seismic safety of the structures; however the courtyard of Casa Magnolia is still used for receptions and social gatherings. Both structures require a seismic upgrade for future occupancy. It is likely that Casa Magnolia will be returned for public use as an amenity to the hotel. A proposed project to add a series of recreational pools in the area of the Morgan House may affect the structure in the near future. Neither the Morgan House nor Casa Magnolia is currently designated at the federal, state or local level, though both have been previously determined eligible for listing as historic resources. III. METHODOLOGY The methodology used to prepare the following historical resource evaluation was based on a two-day site visit and an evaluation made under the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. The building was photographed at the time of the site visit. During the same time, a structural engineering consultant conducted on on -site investigation. The scope of work for this project included limited time for documentary research. The search for background materials related, to the general history of the hotel, the site, and some individual persons associated with the properties has been conducted at the Los Angeles Public Library. Requests for information were handled via telephone interviews with Louise Neeley of the La Quinta Historical Society and Judy Vossler former manager of the La Quinta Hotel for Landmark Land Co. Building specific information, especially with regard to alterations, has not yielded significant information. For the benefit of future researchers, books and articles that were not reviewed or located are listed separately. Sanborn maps were checked but did not yield any information relevant to this report. Archaeological and economic assessments are outside the scope of this evaluation. In 1997 Mellon and Associates prepared a DPR Form (California State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 523) for the Walter Morgan House outlining the historical significance of the house. The evaluation concluded that the structure is eligible for designation as a City of La Quinta Landmark under Criterion C for architectural merit. It was further determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion B and C its association with architect Gordon B. Kaufmann and Walter Morgan developer of the La Quinta Hotel as well as for architectural merit. This report does not duplicate the research efforts. The DPR Form for the Walter Morgan House is attached as Appendix B. Casa Magnolia was evaluated at the same time as the Morgan House and a Primary Record DPR was completed that gives Casa Magnolia a status code rating of 5S1 meaning that the property is recognized as historically significant by the local government. The DPR Form for Casa Magnolia (La Casa) is attached as Appendix C. An article tilled -At the Very Edge of the Desert" appeared in a 1932 issue of Home and Field magazine profiling the architecture of Casa Magnolia. It demonstrates the extremely high level of integrity of the historic fabric of the building and is attached as Appendix D. ARcHrrEcluan[ RESQORCE$ GRoue 2 U r Architects, Planners La COnSCMEC _1, Inc. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 IV. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR HISTORIC RESOURCES National Register of Historic Places Eligibility The National Register of Historic Places is the Nation's master inventory of known historic resources and includes listings of buildings, structures, sites, objects and districts that possess historic, architectural, engineering, archaeological or cultural significance at the national, state or local level. Four criteria provide the basis under which a structure, site, building, district, or object can be considered significant for listing on the National Register. A potential resource needs to meet only one of the four criteria to achieve significance. The criteria include resources that: (A) are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad Patterns of history (such as a Civil War battlefield or a Naval Ship building Center); or (B) are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past (such as Thomas Jefferson's Monticello or the Susan B. Anthony birthplace); or (C) embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity, whose components may lack individual distinction (such as Frank Lloyd Wright's Taliesin or the Midwestern Native American Indian Mounds); or -,� (D) have yielded or may likely yield information important in prehistory or history (such ( as prehistoric ruins in Arizona or the archaeological sites of the first European settlements in St. Augustine, Florida or at the Presidio of San Francisco). Once a potential resource is determined to have met one of the four criteria, its significance should be evaluated within its historic context or historical patternrelevant to a particular geographic area. Historic contexts are found at a variety of geographical levels or scales, specifically the local, state or national level. The geographic scale selected may relate to a pattern of historical development,a political division, or a cultural area.' California Register of Historical Resources Eligibility The California Register of Historical Resources is the authoritative guide to the State's significant historical and archeological resources. It serves to identify, evaluate, register and protect California's historical resources. The California Register program encourages public recognition and protection of resources of architectural, historical, archeological and cultural significance, idenfifies historical resources for state and local planning purposes, determines eligibility for historic preservation grant funding and affords certain protections under the California Environmental Quality Act All resources listed on or formally determined eligible for the National Register are eligible for the California Register. In addition, properties designated under municipal or county ordinances are also eligible for listing in the California Register. The California Register criteria are modeled on the National Register criteria discussed above. An historical resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following criteria: ' National Register Bulletin 15: How to Apply National Register Criteria, p. 9. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 3 ,y yc A �i� Architects, Pln us Tv ConeU4ervnwn, Inc. v a. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 1. it is associated with events or patterns of events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States: or 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; or 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, state or the nation. As explained above, the California Register and National Register criteria are quite similar. As this report is evaluates the buildings as historical resources under CEQA, the California Register criteria will be applied. V. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND — DEVELOPMENT OF THE LA QUINTA HOTEL La Quinta Hotel _ Both the La Quinta Hotel and the City of Palm Springs developed about the same time as exclusive f enclaves for the wealthy, winter resorts for movie stars and the well-to-do. Like Palm Springs, La Quinta tt was a resort and a retreat, but with a more sedate reputation. After a period of initial growth in the 1920s and early 30s, it remained a quiet place. Distinct from Palm Springs, La Quinta fostered exclusivity in a sedate setting and promoted the benefits of a retreat. It was meant to cater to those who preferred visiting on horseback to view the 'desert charms" Located in a sheltered cove, the first phase of the hotel was completed and dedicated in 1927. It consisted of the main building and six cottages on forty acres. All buildings were constructed of adobe. Built at an estimated cost of $150,000, the architect was Gordon B. Kaufman of Los Angeles. The hotel was managed by Walter Morgan 'on the American plan" The American plan included three meals daily. In 1927, an early visitor arrived by car from Los Angeles and wrote of the hotel And there way off in what they insist upon calling the "desert" we came upon this luxurious, very modern "Old Spanish" hacienda, where they do things in the Biltmore style, with a marvelous chef and evening -clothed head waiters, and downy couches, and fancy bathrooms.... recently built by Walter Morgan of San Francisco, who originally made his money in oysters. Walter Morgan has built a dreamlike place there, with lovely lawn and fountain and flowers apparently growing out of barren sand with mountains all around.` In the early years La Quinta would open for the 'season" in November. Newspapers regularly announced prominent visitors, including socialites and movie stars of the caliber of Lionel Barrymove 3'Beauty of Coachella Valley Greets Visitors in Spring." in Los Angeles Times. March 13, 1927. p. G10. "Unique Indio Hotel Recently Given Formal Dedication." in Los Angeles Times. February 6, 1927, p. E7. '"Beauty of Coachella Valley Greets Visitors in Spring' in Los Angeles Times. March 13, 1927. p. G10. AacHirEctuRAL REsouRcEs GxouP 4 Archirais, Planners & coneavarors, hn 00040.7 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QuiNTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 and Jeannette MacDonald! During the first decades the newspapers were filled with lists of.the names of socialites and movie stars and wealthy Californians who visited the La Quinta ResorL After the death of Walter Morgan in 1931, the hotel was taken over by Frederick C. Clift, owner of San Francisco's Clift Hotel and the El Mirasol in Santa Barbara. In 1931 an article appeared in the Los Angeles Times staling that C.KG. Billings, millionaire sportsman of Santa Barbara would stay at La Quinta for the entire season and would be bringing his own stable of polo ponies.' The same article enumerated the improvements completed in the off-season, including a new green nine -hole three -par golf course in place of the former dirt course (laid out by Norman Macbeth? a modern barbershop and a beauty parlor. In 1935, an article was published to attract visitors, with reports of room refurbishment and the addition of a new cocktail lounge, La Quinta Cantina.' Refer to the timeline below for additional hotel history. Avenida Obregon, a north -south street, originally separated the hotel from the privately held properties to the west, including Olive Tree (not Olive Tree Ranch), the Morgan House, and the date palm grove. Originally, the Olive Tree site was surrounded by desert terrain, and it consisted of a house, swimming pool, scattered olive trees and one particularly large olive tree near the pool. The date of the date palm tree grove has not been confirmed, but Louise Neely reports that it dates to 1919 and was planted by Fabian Granados, who was involved in the construction of the Morgan House. Others confirm that the date palm grove was fully mature by 1972. When the Landmark Land Company purchased La Quinta Hotel in the late 1970s, the western properties remained in private ownership. The Church of Sclentology reportedly owned the western properties for sometime but vacated them in the 1970s. The Landmark Land Company acquired the Olive Tree site, the vacant Morgan House, and the date palm grove in the 1980s. At the time, and the land to the west was still open desert, and La Quinta was not yet incorporated as a city. The pool and the large tree on the Olive Tree site were removed to build the sunken tennis court. All other tennis courts on the original Olive Tree site date to the 1980s. Landmark used the Morgan House as office space.10 6 "Here's Where Stars Will Spend New Year's if They Don't Change Their Minds." in Los Angeles Times. December 31, 1933, p. Al and'Southlanders Vacationing at Desert Resort' in Los Angeles Times. February 24,1935, p. B4. '"Desert Will 'Go Polo' at Resort Near Indio" in Los Angeles Times. November 13, 1931, p. At2. 8'Resort Notes" in Los Angeles Times. January 30, 1927. p. G10. ° "La Quinta Prospects Promising, Coachella Resort Reports Encouraging Preseason Reservation List." in Los Angeles Times. December 20,1935, p. A14. 10 Information summarized from a telephone interview with Judy Vossler of the Landmark Land Company, former manager of the La Quinta Hotel. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GRoup 5 Anhitccis, Plmnas & Come tots, Inc. �r'�( //��4Q 0V1.1rzV t EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LAQUINTA RESORT 1--- LAQUWTA, CAUFORNIA JUNE2006 Brief Timeline Regarding Hotel Ownership/ManagemenUDevelopment 1931 Death of Walter H. Morgan 1931 Frederick Clift of Clift Hotel, San Francisco assumes management 1931 Allen C. Breed, resident manager. 1931-45 Finances of the hotel overseen by B.J. Bradner, investor and attorney 1935 Rene Georges Varlet, hotel management c 1938 New swimming pool constructed, designed by Kaufmann 1942-45 Hotel closed 1945 New owner, John Balaban of Chicago, businessman and theater owner c 1955 New owner, Leonard Ettleson 1977 La Quinta sold to Landmark Land, Inc., Ernie Vossler and John Waster c 1980 Morgan House purchased by Landmark for use as part of hotel. c 1980 Casa Magnolia (then known as the Thompson House) purchased Landmark for use as pan of hotel. 1980S Tennis Club developed c 1990 Hotel acquired by KSL c 2004 Hotel acquired by CNL Gordon B. Kaufmann, Architect Architect Gordon B. Kaufmann designed the 1920s buildings at the La Quinta Hotel, including the casitas and main hotel lobby. Kaufman was also responsible for the design of the Morgan House, Casa Magnolia, and various other private residences adjacent to the hotel. Kaufmann (1888-1949) was one of Southern California's most prolific architects in the 1920s, 30s and 40s. Born in London, Kaufmann worked in Europe. Canada and other US locations before settling in Southern California. As the architect of many of Southern California's most important residences, Kaufmann's work shifted to large commercial and industrial projects in the 1930s including of Hoover Dam, Santa Anita Park Racetrack (1933), Scripps College Library (1926), Greystone, the Doheny residence in Beverly Hills (1929-31). St. Paul's Episcopal Cathedral, and many other Los Angeles residences, offices, and commercial buildings. Kaufmann was honored as a Fellow of the American Institute of Architects. During his career he was awarded the Legion of Merit, a Certificate of Honor from the AIA for the La Quinta Hotel (1930) and a Gold Medal at the French Exposition (1937).11 A. MORGAN HOUSE A. Description and Historical Background Built in 1926-27 to the designs of architect Gordon B. Kaufmann, the Morgan House was the residence of Walter Morgan, the founder and developer of La Quinta Hotel. The two-story adobe structure is highly characteristic of the Monterey style of architecture popular in California in the 1920s. "Biographical information on Kaufmann is summarized from the DPR form for La Quinta Hotel, Casitas and Grounds completed by Mellon and Associates, dated September 4, 1997. 1 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 6 4-� Archirccrs, Planners & Cotuc ors, Inc. V ~} EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT r _ LA Qu1NTA, CAUFORNIA JUNE2006 Monterey Style The Morgan House is an excellent example of the Monterey style. It exhibits the basic tenets and characteristic elements of the Monterey style through the use of an asymmetrical composition, two-story massing, low-pitched gabled roof with red day file, a distinctive cantilevered second -story balcony covered by the principal roof, exposed rafters, hewn beams, and simple wood posts. Also highly characteristic is plastered wall finish (typically whitewashed), which exhibits a non -uniform handmade texture, evidenced on both expanses of wall plane and rounded corners and ledges. This is associated with both the Monterey style and traditional adobe construction. (See Appendix A, Figure 1 and note the similarity of all door and window openings and the location of the chimney.) Materials and Adobe Construction Many of the materials used in the construction and furnishing of the Morgan House were fabricated on. site, including the adobe bricks fired in on -site kilns, hand fabricated roof and floor tiles, and porch furniture made in the hotel shops." Casework was also made on site." At the time the hotel was completed in 1927, it was noted that ....all buildings were made of adobe with file roofs and floors, all the adobe used in the construction work being made and burned on the property by Mexicans skilled in the art." Louise Neeley of the La Quinta Historical Society confirmed that materials were fabricated on site. Her great-uncle Fabian Granados contributed to the construction of the structures. The manufacture of adobe bricks on site lends to the historical significance of the site. Site The house is located on Avenida Obregon in the northwest comer of the La Quinta Resort. It is adjacent to present-day tennis courts and pool to the south and north and the date palm grove to the north. A private drive running east -west borders the northern end of the lot and connects to Avenida Obregon. At present, the site immediately surround the Morgan House contains, in addition to the house and original garage, other associated structures and site features including: • Low wall incorporating a fireplace that forms a partially enclosed courtyard to the north. A shed - roofed arcade at the original garage forms the east wall of the courtyard; • Utility storage building with an arcade, which forms the west wall of the enclosed courtyard; and • Free standing garage at the northwest comer of the site. Exterior Description The Morgan House site originally consisted of a two-story residence with a freestanding garage to the northeast The two structures were linked together by a low site wall. The garage was later converted to living space, and a one-story addition was constructed to connect the living spaces in the garage to 'the main house. The plan of the original residence is rectangular, with the main entry on the east elevation and a projecting dining room bay in the northwest comer. The second floor does not extend the full width of the house. The second floor is covered by a gable roof, with deeply overhanging eaves, exposed rafter tails, day file roofing. Shed roofs, also in day tile but with shallower eaves, cover the one-story portions of the building. The exterior walls are constructed of adobe bride and are finished 'Z California Arts and Architecture, January 1930, "Architectural Record, February 1934. ° "Resort Notes." in Los Angeles Times. January 30,1927. p. G10. ARCHITEcYML kESouRCFs GROOP Arctutccts, Plannas & Coms tors, Inc. 000430 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT - - LA QUINTA, CAUFORNIA JuNe2006 with whitewashed, textured stucco. Wood windows and doors, wood posts and railings, and metal grillework are used throughout Each of the four elevations is different The front elevation (east elevation) has an asymmetrical composition, with large expanses of flat wall surface; a second floor, projecting balcony and pair of French doors at the south end; a central entry door set in a decorative plaster surround; and a small window with bled grillework above the entry. At the northern end, the unpunctuated wall surface and sloping shed roof at the kitchen has been obscured by the addition. The addition and the garage are covered by a continuous shed roof, which also covers a porch at the east side of the addition. A pair of French doors provides access to the porch, and the garage wall is punctuated by a chimney and small window openings with file grillework, The south elevation is nearly symmetrical with a stucco chimney set in the center of a gable wall. A pair of French doors flank either side of the chimney at the first floor, while a single casement window is used at the east end of the second floor. A one-story loggia with file pavers, stuccoed columns, wood framing, and a filed roof was an early addition to the south elevation. A projecting balcony extending the full width of the second floor dominates the west elevation. The balcony, with exposed wood floor framing and simple wood posts and guardrail, is covered by the principal roof. At the south end, there are windows a both stories. In the center, the screened porches at troth levels have been infilled with glazed windows and doors. At the east end, a conopial bay with metal grillework is set in the center of the projecting dining room wing, which is covered with a sloping shed roof. The north elevation consists of the projecting first floor construction covered by a shed roof and a recessed sleeping porch at the second floor. Three casement windows and a door are irregularly placed in the first floor elevation. The second floor sleeping porch elevation has a symmetrical composition, with adobe wing walls flanking a large expanse of casement windows. Vertical wood siding is used to finish the wall above the windows. Historic drawings show that the sleeping porch windows were originally screened openings. The north elevation encloses one side of the north courtyard, and the garage forms the east side. The original garage door openings have been infilled and a shed -roofed arcade has been to the east side of the garage. The exterior of the Morgan House is in good condition overall. The paving tiles at the site walkways and porches are severely delaminated. The original studded wood front door has been removed and replaced with an incompatible aluminum frame and glass door. While all of the original windows are extant, the original wood shutters have been removed. The roof is in fair condition, with many loose or broken tiles. Interior Description The first floor rooms of the Morgan House are arranged around the central entrance hall and screened porch. The original screened porch, now enclosed with glazing, provides access to a large, rectangular living room to the south and the dining room to the north. The kitchen is located in the northeast corner of the house. A new opening at the east side of the kitchen provides access to the addition and garage. The stairway in the central entrance hall provides access to the partial basement at the south end of the building and to the second floor. The stair originally led directly to the sleeping porch at the north side of the second floor, but partitions have been added to create a second floor hallway. A small bath in the northeast comer of the second floor serves the sleeping porch. A large bedroom with a closet and bathroom are located at the south end of the second floor. l ARCHITECTURAL. RESOURCES GROUP 8 0 0 0 4 Jn,_ Ardutc s, Planners & Consc Wn, Inc. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT - - LA QuiNTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 The interior of the house appears to have undergone a comprehensive remodeling campaign when the house was converted to office space. The campaign included the construction of a new partition in the living room and installation of new carpeted and vinyl floor finishes, new fluorescent light fixtures and surface mounted data conduit, new kitchen cabinets and fixtures, and a new mechanical system. Despite these alterations, many of the original finishes and fittings, such as door and window hardware and curtain rods, remain. The original wood, file, and exposed concrete flooring remain beneath the carpet. Original plaster wall finishes remain, as do ceilings with both flat plaster finishes and exposed wood framing. Refer to the Building Alterations section for additional information. B. Building Alterations Chronology of Building Alterations The Morgan House retains a high level of architectural integrity. Despite early exterior alterations and additions, it retains its character defining features and conveys its early history. Exterior alterations include: • northern addition incorporating the original garage into the Crouse, not of adobe construction • infiil of garage door openings and construction of covered walkway at the west wall of the garage • south loggia, columns and file shed roof are an early addition • pergola on the west previously had a canvas awning, now mature bougainvillea 1 Though the essential form of the interior is intact and the spaces retain the original configuration, circulation, and general organization, interior modifications are to be expected and have occurred, such as: • interior, original finishes original circulation and room configuration with minimal addition of a partition wall in the living room on the ground floor and the construction of a wall to enclose the sleeping porch wall on the second floor • first floor screened porch glazed instead of screened; presumably the doors connecting the porch to the living and dining rooms were removed when the porch was enclosed • second floor sleeping porch glazed instead of screened • living room fireplace and surround plastered over; original tiled surround is visible beneath the plaster • buildng systems upgraded in the 1980s • main entrance door is.a replacement • hall closet converted to passage for kitchen access; a portion of the adobe wall construction was ,removed to facilitate access • door opening between the dining room and kitchen infilled • door opening in east wall of kitchen to provide access to the addition • kitchen remains in original location but fully updated, few original features in this room • new toilet ground floor C. Character -Defining Features The following is a list of exterior features that contribute to the building's design. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 9 `--- , Arch tmis, Plana s & Commatm, Inc. 0 0 0 4 3 H EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT IA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 • asymmetrical facade • two-story massing • low-pitched gabled roof with red clay file • deep eave • exposed rafters • whitewashed stucco wall finish • chimney with brick crown • cantilevered second -story balcony covered by the principal roof • simple wood posts and wood slat railings on balcony • board and battens siding at the second level • casement windows originally with exterior louvered wood shutters • low site walls incorporating a fireplace on the north side • partially enclosed rear courtyard patio • loggia • file used as window grille The following is a list of interior character -defining features: • the floors • wood floors • arched openings • sleeping porch arrangement • multi -pane French doors • multi-lite casement windows with mesh screens • built-in niche -type bookshelves • fireplace (in addition extant) • fireplace (in Irving room concealed 25 years ago) • original fittings, hardware (curtain rods, window hardware, heating system grates, switchplates) D. Evaluation of Integrity Integrity is a key component of the overall building evaluation. Without sufficient integrity, further discussion of the significance of the Morgan House and its eligibility for listing on the California Register would not be warranted. For both the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register, integrity is the authenticity of an historical resource's physical identity, evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Integrity involves several aspects, including location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. These aspects closely relate to the resource's significance and should be primarily intact for designation. Though not used as a residence during the last three decades, the Morgan House was originally designed as a house for Walter Morgan in 1927 by architect Gordon B. Kaufmann. It remains intact in terms of original building envelope, volume, massing, materials and design intent. The original garage has been modified as interior space and is now connected to the main house, altering the circulation and ground floor plan. Based on material inspection, this appears to be an early alteration. Many of the original spaces, finishes and fixtures have been retained in the main house with the exception of the original kitchen which has been altered. After acquisition by the Landmark Land Company circa 1980, ARCHrtECnJML RESouRCEs GROUP 10 t ry Atchiwts, Planncts & Consctmots, Inc. F { EVALUAr10N OF ADOBES AT LA QuINTA REsoRr LA QUINTA, CAUFORNIA JUNE2006 the Morgan House was used as office space. For the transition from residential to office use, the building had a comprehensive upgrade of mechanical and electrical systems. Overall, the Morgan House has been fairly well maintained over time and retains architectural integrity Location Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. The Morgan House not been moved from the location where it was built. It remains in its original footprint. Though the hotel boundaries have been extended over time and now encompass the house, it was originally, like all properties west of Avenida Obregon, a private dwelling. After 1980 the house became part of the La Quinta Hotel. This aspect of its integrity has not been diminished. Design Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. Gordon Kaufmann's design for the Morgan House epitomizes the Monterey style through the use of an asymmetrical composition, two-story massing, low-pitched gabled roof with red clay tile, exposed rafters, whitewashed stucco wall finish and general color palette, cantilevered second -story balcony covered by the principal roof and simple wood posts. Design changes to the exterior of the main house include the garage modification, which has changed the exterior envelope on the north and west. On the exterior, the degree of integrity is good. Setting Setting is the physical environment of an historic property, constituting topographic features, vegetation, manmade features, and relationships between buildings or open space. The setting has changed significantly over time. Originally identified with a remote and rural desert terrain and a rocky landscape, the immediate setting is now green and verdant characterized by lawns, trees and flowers. Natural features that continue to contribute to the setting of the property include the date palm grove on the lot to the north and the far distance views to the nearby mountains from the house. Probably the most significant factor in the change in setting of the Morgan House is the hotel expansion and the new construction that has encroached on the site, including condos to the west and the tennis dub and pool to the south and southwest on the former grounds of the Olive Tree House. Integrity with regard to setting is fair. Materials Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form an historic property. Morgan Hose like the early 20"' century desert house are distinguished by the use of site -fabricated materials, including adobe brick, roof and floor file and casework. The site's remote location dictated that materials were fabricated on site. Integrity with regard to materials is high. Workmanship Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture, people, or artisan during any given period in history or pre -history. As slated above, the site's remote location resulted in the onsite fabrication of certain materials. In the hotels on -site workshops, crews of craftsmen fabricated the adobe bricks fired in on -site kilns, hand fabricated roof and floor tiles, and made casework in the hotel shops. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 11 Architecrs, Planners & Conservators, Inc. 000434 f EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 The building exhibits the typical techniques associated with adobe construction in the 1920s where a traditional building material was used in a modem way. Thick walls associated with traditional adobe construction were forsaken to create contemporary buildings of larger, loftier volumes of space and high walls. Integrity with regard to workmanship is high. Feeling Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historical sense of a particular period of time. Due to high design values, contemporary detailing, custom-made materials, the property retains much of its original feeling, which contributes to its overall integrity. The original feeling is somewhat diminished by changes to the setting. Association Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and an historic property. The Morgan House retains a long-standing historical association with the La Quinta Hotel and its founder Walter Morgan, in addition to the prominent architect Gordon Kaufmann. Consequently, its association contributes to the building's overall integrity. E. Structural Considerations Description The Morgan House is a 4000 square foot, 2-story structure. It has load -bearing adobe block perimeter and interior walls with a wood -framed floor and roof system with a clay file roof. The structure has a partial basement of board -formed concrete walls and a crawl space with adobe bearing walls. The adobe walls are 17 inches thick (one wythe of adobe) at the exterior of the first floor, as well as at the interior wall below the second floor north gable wall. The adobe walls are 12 inches thick at the remaining first floor interior partitions and on the second floor and gable areas. The interior partitions at the second floor are of wood frame construction. The wails have a continuous concrete bond beam below the second floor joists and another bond beam below the roof rafters. The reinforcing of the bond beam is not known. No degradation of rebar was detected during the site visit. The building has had roof problems in the past but few wall problems. Neither rising damp nor differential settlement was detected. The condition of the foundation appears to be sound with some water Infiltration occurring due to irrigation. As noted in the Building Alterations section, the structure has been modified in the past. The structural changes include the construction of an addition between the garage and main house and the infill of the original garage door openings. In several locations, openings gave been cut in the adobe walls to install through -wall air conditioning units. Structural Considerations! Concerns The structure, with relatively thin adobe walls (a height to thickness ratio of.10:1), is at greater risk of structural failure than more traditional thick-walled adobe construction (a height to thickness ration of 4:1); and this risk is increased due to the proximity of the San Andreas Fault. This risk is reduced only slightly by the concrete bond beams, which help to tie the walls together. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 12 Architects, Planners L2 Commatots, Inc. 0 n I1 `3 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINrA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 Of greatest concern for the seismic performance of the building are: • Out -of -plane failure of thin adobe walls; • The presence of concrete bond beams are beneficial but must be property anchored to the adobe walls and must be continuous; • The corner wing wall in the north wait on the second floor (sleeping porch) will be particularly susceptible to failure in a seismic event; and • Supporting wall failure of the headers that support the first floor screened opening on the west elevation. Applicable Codes The California Historic Building Code (CHBC) is the applicable building code for qualified historic buildings. The CHBC allows for alternative structural approaches for historic buildings. The CHBC also references the Uniform Code for Building Conservation (UCBC) as an alternative approach. The CHBC allows adobe walls with slenderness ratios of 5 or 6 and less without additional measures for strengthening or bracing the walls out -of -plane. The UCBC allows adobe walls of 6 or 9. These higher slenderness ratios were based upon research on adobe buildings conducted by the Getty Conservation Institute (GCI) in the 1990's. Structural Recommendations The building should be strengthened to life safety levels per the CHBC before any occupancy is contemplated. While it is outside the scope of this report to design a structural strategy for seismic upgrading, the retrofit measures should include the following actions: In and out -of -plane strengthening either through pilasters, braces, center cores, or mesh reinforcing with thni-wall fies; Ties and connectors between roof and floor structure and concrete bond beams; and Removal and replacement of any element of the structure that is not adequately supported or braced such as comer wing wall at the north gable wall. In this situation, it may be necessary to remove a limited amount of adobe material and replace it with stucco over wood framing, matching the thickness of the original wall. Openings cut into the walls, either at the time of construction (bookcase niches or plumbing chases) or later (openings for air conditioning units), could be infilled to provide additional sheer capacity. The openings can be infilled by stitching new adobes into the wall and patching with mortar to strengthen the walls. Where it is preferable to retain the original features of the building, such as the bookcase niches, center coring the wall is an option that will increase sheer capacity. While these measures are more comprehensive than typically used on more traditional adobe structures and will need to be carefully developed to preserve historic fabric, there is no structural reason why structural retrofit of the Morgan House to life safety levels would not be feasible. VII. Casa Magnolia ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP Architars, Planners & Cons aron, Inc. 13 00436 EVALUATION of ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUWTA, CAUFORNIA JUNE2006 A. Description and Historical Background Built circa 1927 to the designs of architect Gordon B. Kaufmann as one of six privately owned dwellings on the grounds of the La Quinta Hotel, Casa Magnolia was the residence of Mrs. Lee Eleanor Graham, a Southern California socialite and wife of one of California's wealthiest oil barons at the time, William Miller Graham After her divorce she opened an interior decorator practice, a relevant fact given the intact finishes and furnishings installed by her, which remain in the property. She also collaborated on some aspects of the design including the inlaid floors." Designed for the desert climate, the house is a tripartite arrangement of a pair of detached buildings flanking a central courtyard that was intended as living and dining space. The two buildings are connected by a site wall along the eastern perimeter of the property that is punctuated by a fireplace The style is eclectic, relying on a Spanish Colonial or a Mission vocabulary of simple volumes, varying roof gabled planes, red day file, and thick, whitewashed walls. Local craftsmen constructed the house. Prior to 1977, Casa Magnolia remained a privately held residence on the edge of the desert. The complex was last known as the'Thompson House' prior to the purchase by Landmark Land Cc and incorporation into the resort. The house was used as Landmark's corporate offices from 1977 through circa 1985. The name'La Casa' was given to the building circa 1985 when the use changed from office to public meeting room use. According to people who worked there and consistent with field observations, the house was never altered. Only minor alterations were carried out during its use as offices and though the transition to meeting spaces." The building remains in its original location. Its original setting on the edge of the desert has been lost, as the hotel has expanded around it. Materials and Adobe Construction Some of materials used in the construction of Casa Magnolia were of local manufacture, specifically adobe bricks. Other materials used in the construction included concrete foundations, plastered adobe walls, red clay file roof, floors of wood, tile, concrete and mosaic, wood doors and windows, and salvaged architectural elements at the interior. Outbuildings and Site Features of Casa Magnolia Casa Magnolia is located at the southwest corner of the resort, just south of Avenida Obregon. The original garage with the desert rooftop observatorylterrace remains intact at the northwest comer of the site. A restroom has been added to the east side of the garage. The original low site walls at the west side of the house remain, enclosing a large vacant space that was once an above -grade pool. A low wall on the east side encloses the courtyard. A fireplace and screened openings are set in this wall. Exterior Description Casa Magnolia is a multi -level structure comprised of two structures, a north wing and south wing, and a central courtyard that separates them. It has load -bearing adobe block perimeter walls with a whitewashed stucco finish and gabled, clay tile roofs. The eaves are typically shallow, although deep overhangs with exposed rafter tails are present at some of the elevations. The various elevations are comprised of vast expanses of flat, stuccoed wall surfaces; wood and glass doors; and wood windows with wood shutters, file grillework, metal griilework, or projecting conopial bays. The main entry to the house occurs through a gate in a site wall in the southeast corner of the site and through a large " Stow -Fithian, Anne. "At the Very Edge of the Desert." 1932. p. 77. e Information summarized from a telephone interview with Judy Vossler of the Landmark Land Company, former manager of the La Quinta Hotel. ( ARCHITECIURAL REsouRcEs GRouP 14 Archicccrs, Plannus & coms coo, Inc. 000437 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QuINTA, CALIFORNIA .TUNE 2006 studded wood door set in a decorative surround at the east end of the south elevation. The central courtyard was intended as Irving space and is outfitted with a fireplace, window seats at the screened openings in the east site wall, a fountain, and a built-in table. As most of the circulation between the rooms at in both the north and south wings occurs on the exterior of the building, four staircases of differing designs are prominent exterior features. Interior Description The south wing of Casa Magnolia consists of two grand spaces, the drawing room and the cactus room, with soaring ceilings with exposed wood framing. A dressing room and bathroom are accessed from the drawing room. A small bachelors' sleeping room and two bathrooms are accessible from the cactus room. The north wing consists of another grand space, the dining room, a kitchen, and small bedroom and bathroom. A workshop / servant's area is located in the northwest comer of this wing, and a full height basement is located below the bedroom at the east end of the wing. Refer to the Materials and Adobe Construction and Character -Defining Features sections for a discussion of interior finishes and fittings. B. Building Alterations The buildings retain a very high level of architectural integrity, due to the lack of exterior alterations or additions. The interior retains a very high level of integrity with most original finishes, fixtures and some furnishings intact The buildings retain original character defining features on the exterior and interior. The interior spaces retain the original configuration, circulation, and general organization. Interior t - modifications that are to be expected especially in the areas of the kitchen and bathrooms have not occurred. Changes have occurred to the site: • Pool removed • Flagstone paving at courtyard patio partially replaced • Public restroom added at rear (east) of original garagetobservatory terrace C. Character -Defining Features The following is a list of exterior features that contribute to the building's design: low pitched gabled roof with red clay life • whitewashed stucco wall finish • chimney • central courtyard patio with shade awnings • casement windows originally with exterior louvered wood shutters • flagstone paving (partially replaced in the courtyard) • narrow staircases to raised living spaces with hand painted tiles on risers • cast iron balustrade in courtyard • niche with Madonna ceramic • window grilles set into projecting conopial bays / ARCHfIECTURAL REsoURCEs GROUP 15 1 Archiacu, Plannccs & CaRsavmu, Inc_ 000438 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CAUFORNIA JUNE 2006 The following is a list of interior character -defining features: • living spaces of large proportions • (upper drawing room ceiling is 18' to the ridge beam) • (cactus room ceiling is 16'-6" to the highest point) • concrete floors with mosaics • large (12" x 12") file rustic floors • marble slab flooring (salvaged) in bedroom • arched openings • fireplace hood, integral to plaster wall • scagliola spiral columns and console brackets (salvaged) • heavy wood shutters (salvaged) • painted and silver leaf murals • exposed wood framing at ceilings • exposed ceiling trusses with king posts, interlaced and bolted • multi -pane French doors • fireplace with salvaged elements • built-in niche -type bookshelves • kitchen with intact original tiles, cabinetry, appliances • all original bathroom tiles, fixtures • handpainted the floors • all original fittings, hardware (curtain rods, window hardware, heating system grates, switchplates) D. Evaluation of Integrity Integrity is a key component of the overall building evaluation. Without sufficient integrity, further discussion of the significance of the Casa Magnolia and its eligibility for listing on the California Register would not be warranted. For both the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register, integrity is the authenticity of an historical resource's physical identity, evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Integrity involves several aspects, including location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. These aspects closely relate to the resource's significance and should be primarily intact for designation. From 1927, the date of construction until purchase by Landmark Land Company, Casa Magnolia was a privately owned residence. In the transition from residence to office use in the eady1980s,it was very lightly modified. At present, it is distinguished by the amount of original historic materials in the building and their excellent condition. It remains extremely intact in terms of original building envelope, volume, massing, materials and design intent. Overall, Casa Magnolia has been very well maintained over time and retains a high degree of architectural integrity. Location Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. Casa Magnolia not been moved from the location where it was built. It remains in its original ARCHfrFcRjRAL RESOURCES GROUP 16 Acchitccu, Platuu f? Commatora, Inc. 000439 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QuiNTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 footprint. Though the hotel boundaries have been extended over time and now encompass the house, it was originally a private dwelling apart from the hotel. After 1980 the house became part of the La Quinta Hotel. This aspect of its integrity has not been diminished. Design Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. Gordon Kaufmann's design for the Casa Magnolia relied on the use of an eclectic style based on a vocabulary of simple volumes, varying roof gabled planes, red Gay tile, thick whitewashed wails. The house contains exquisite interior features such as concrete floors inlaid with alabaster and marble mosaics, painted and silver leaf murals, all original bathroom tiles and fixtures, and handpainted tile floors. Design has had very few modifications over time. With regard to the interior, exterior and site, the degree of integrity is high. Setting Setting is the physical environment of an historic property, constituting topographic features, vegetation, manmade features, and relationships between buildings or open space. The setting has changed significantly over time. Originally known for its edge -of -the -desert identity, adjacent to rural desert terrain and a rocky landscape, the immediate setting is now green and verdant, characterized by lawns, trees and flowers. Hotel expansion and new construction has encroached on the site. Integrity with regard to setting is fair. Materials Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form an historic property. Like the Morgan House, Casa Magnolia is distinguished by the use of site -fabricated materials, including adobe brick, roof and floor file and casework. The site's remote location dictated that materials were fabricated on site. In addition, the owner incorporated salvaged architectural elements of high quality. Integrity with regard to materials is high. Workmanship Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture, people, or artisan during any given period in history or pre -history. As stated above, the site's remote location resulted in the onsite fabrication of certain materials. Under the direction of architect Gordon Kaufmann the hotel's on -site workshops, crews of craftsmen fabricated the adobe bricks fired in on -site kilns, hand fabricated roof and floor tiles, and made casework in the hotel shops. The building exhibits the typical techniques associated with adobe construction in the 1920s where a traditional building material was used in a modem way. Thick walls associated with traditional adobe construction were forsaken to create contemporary buildings of larger, loffier volumes of space and high walls. Integrity with regard to workmanship is high. Feeling Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historical sense of a particular period of time. Due to high design values, contemporary detailing, custom-made materials, the property retains much of its original feeling, which contributes to its overall integrity. The original feeling is somewhat diminished by changes to the setting. Association ` ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 17 Architects, Plain s & Con orators, Inc. 000440 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QutNTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORmA JUNE2006 Association Is the direct link between an important historic event or person and an historic property. Casa Magnolia is associated with prominent architect Gordon Kaufmann. Consequently, its association contributes to the building's overall integrity. E. Structural Considerations Description Casa Magnolia consists of two structures flanking the north and south sides of a central courtyard. The northern wing is a 1700 square foot, multi -level structure. It has load -bearing adobe block perimeter and interior walls with concrete slab floors at grade, wood -framed floors at raised levels, and a wood -framed_ and day file roof system. There is aboveground basement at the east end of the structure. Several of the interior partitions are of wood frame construction. The adobe walls vary in thickness from 12 to 17 inches (one wythe of adobe). The southern wing is a 2500 square foot, one level structure. The floor level at the east end is elevated approximately 5 feet above grade, with a crawl space below. The south wing has load -bearing adobe block perimeter and interior walls with concrete slab floors at grade, wood -framed floors at raised levels, and a wood -framed and clay file roof system. The condition of the foundation appears to be sound with some water infiltration occurring due to irrigation and pooling of water at the east elevation. The adobe walls vary in thickness from 12 to 17 to 31 inches in thickness. During on on -site investigation in May 2006, the team was not able to verify the presence of continuous concrete bond beams at the tops of the walls. Structural Considerations f Concerns The structure, with relatively thin adobe walls (a height to thickness ratio of 10:1), is at greater risk of structural failure than more traditional thick-walled adobe construction (a height to thickness ration of 4:1) and is increased due to the proximity of the San Andreas Fault This risk would be reduced only slightly by the presence of concrete bond beams that would help to be the wails together. Of greatest concern for the seismic performance of the building are: Out -of -plane failure of high gable and walls. Of particular concern are the east wall of the Sala (southern wing), which has a 31 inches wide, 18 foot high gable wall punctuated by a window opening and two bookcase niches; and the gable wall between the Sala and the Cactus Rooms, which measures 14 inches in width, 18 feet in height, and is also punctured by a large niche; Failure of cross walls due to loading. The east and west walls of the Cactus Room (southern wing) are 12 inches thick including the plaster finish, which makes them the thinnest load -bearing walls in the complex; and If bond beams do exist, their presence would be beneficial; but they would need to be continuous and properly anchored to the walls. Applicable Codes The California Historic Building Code (CHBC) is the applicable building code for qualified historic buildings. The CHBC allows for alternative structural approaches for historic buildings. The CHBC also references the Uniform Code for Building Conservation (UCBC) as an alternative approach. I ARCHRECTURAL RESOURCES GROt1P 18 Architccrs, Plnn & Comcrntots, Inc. 000441 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CAuFORNIA JUNE2006 The CHBC allows adobe walls with slenderness ratios of 5 or 6 and less without additional measures for strengthening or bracing the walls cut -of -plane. The UCBC allows adobe walls of 8 or 9. These higher slenderness ratios were based upon research on adobe buildings conducted by the Getty Conservation Institute (GCI) in the 1990's. Structural Recommendations The building should be strengthened to life safety levels per the CHBC before any occupancy is contemplated. It is assumed that Casa Magnolia would be used for assembly purposes in the future, which will require a higher standard for seismic strengthening. While it is outside the scope of this report to design a structural strategy for seismic upgrading, the retrofit measures should include the following actions: • In and out -of -plane strengthening either through pilasters, braces, center cores, or mesh reinforcing with thru-wall ties. It may be necessary to add shotcrete to the thin wall between the Sala and the Cactus Room. • If concrete bond beams are not found in the structure, they should be installed at the tops of walls and at floor levels, with ties and connectors between roof and floor structure. Openings cut into the walls, such as the bookcase niches, could be infilled to provide additional sheer capacity. The openings can be infilled by stitching new adobes into the wall and patching with mortar to strengthen the walls. Where it is preferable to retain the original features of the building, such as the bookcase niches, center coring the wall is an option that will increase sheer capacity. Vill. Conclusion Regarding Eligibility To achieve significance, and thus be eligible for listing on the California Register, a potential resource needs to meet one of the four criteria set forth above. Both the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia are significant at the local level under California Register Criterion 1, for the association with patterns of events that have made a "significant contribution to the broad patterns of local history of California, in this case the development of Southern California desert resort communities in the early part of the 2e century. Both the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia are significant under California Register Criterion 2, for their association with architect Gordon B. Kaufmann. With regard to architectural merit both the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia are significant under California Register Criterion 3, for the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction and because they possess high artistic values. IX. Recommendations Regarding Future Use As both the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia are eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources, The Secretary of the Interiors Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (The Standards) would be an appropriate tool to use in planning for the future use of the structures. The Standards provide general information for stewards of historic resources to determine appropriate ARcHracniw RFsouacEs GRouP 19 .Architects, Planters & commators, Inc. i EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT ! - _ LA Qu1NTA, CAUFORNIA JUNE2006 treatments and uses. They are intentionally broad in scope to apply to a wide range of circumstances and are designed to enhance the understanding of basic preservation principles. The Standards are neither technical nor prescriptive, but are intended to promote responsible preservation practices that ensure continued protection of historic resources. There are four basic standards: preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction. As new uses will likely be proposed for both structures, the rehabilitation standards may be most applicable. Rehabilitation is defined as "the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions and features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values."17 While it is outside the scope of this report to discuss the future uses of the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia, ARG has prepared the following list of potential uses for the structures. These uses have the potential to integrate the underutilized and isolated structures into the public life of La Quinta Resort, while requiring minimal changes to the distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships of the historic buildings. Potential Future Uses —Morgan House • Meeting rooms • Private guest house • House museum / archive / reception / historical images / golf museum • Upscale bar / tea room As a series of recreational pools are proposed for site surrounding the Morgan House, a landscaped buffer zone may be required from some of the uses proposed above. Potential Future Uses — Casa Magnolia • High -end suite • Reception venue "Kay D. Weeks and Anne E. Grimmer, The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior,1995). ARCHITECTURAL REsot Rcu GROUP 20 Acchimccs, Pla as & COn M=n, Inc. () 4 ,11 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA .TUNE 2006 X. Bibliography Gebhard, David and Robert Winter. Los Angeles: An Architectural Guide. Salt Lake City: Gibbs Smith, 1994. McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002. Mellon and Associates Historic Preservation Consultants. La Quinta Hotel Historic Resource Evaluation. Submitted to Forrest K. Haag, ASLA. May,1997. "Portfolio of Low -Cost Houses." in Architectural Record. Volume 74. November, 1933_ p. 345- 351. Sanborn Map Company, Indio, California, 1928, 1939. New York: Sanborn Map Company. Stow -Fithian, Anne. 'At the Very Edge of the Desert" in Home and Field. Volume 42. February, 1932. United States Department of the Interior. National Register of Historic Places. National Register Bulletin 15: How to Apply National Register Criteria,1995. United States Department of the Interior. National Register of Historic Places. National Register Bulletin 39: Researching A Historic Property, 1991. Weeks, Kay D. and Anne E. Grimmer. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior. 1995. Articles from the Los Angeles Times: "Beauty of Coachella Valley Greets Visitors in Spring." in Los Angeles Times. March 13, 1927. p. G10. "Desert Magic' in Los Angeles Times. November 19,1933. p. F6. "Desert Will 'Go Polo' al Resort Near Indio." in Los Angeles Times, November 13, 1931. p. Al2. `Here's Where Stars Will Spend New Years if They Don't Change Their Minds." in Los Angeles Times. December 31, 1933. p. Al. "La Quinta Has Spell of Desert, Rest in Surroundings of Luxury and Beauty Can Be Enjoyed at Resort." in Los Angeles Times. December 19, 1930. p. B8. "La Quinta Prospects Promising, Coachella Resort Reports Encouraging Preseason Reservation List" in Los Angeles Times. December 20, 1935. p. Al4. ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 21 Architects, Plamers & Conservators, Inc. 000444 EVALUATION OF AOOBEs AT LA QuiNTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CAuFORNIA JUNE2006 "Leader of World's Elite Seeks Divorce from Baron of Oil Trade." in Los Angeles Times. December 31, 1914. p. 111, "Looking Southwest of Hotel." in Los Angeles Times. November 13, 1927. p. G9. 'Many Visitors at La Quinta; in Los Angeles Times. February 18, 1934, p. B1. "Oil Baron Files Bankrupt Plea, William Graham's Fortune of $20,000,000 Gone.' in Los Angeles Times. June 12, 1925. p. Al. "Resort Notes." in Los Angeles Times. January 30, 1927. p. G10. "Rest Reigns at La Quinta, Resort Becomes World Famous Rendevous." in Los Angeles Times. February 24, 1935, p. B4. 'Southland Hostelries' in Los Angeles Times. January 15, 1928. p. H6. 'Southlanders Vacationing at Desert Resort.' in Los Angeles Times. February 24, 1935. p. B4. "Unique Indio Hotel Recently Given Formal Dedication." in Los Angeles Times. February 6, 1927. p. E7. References Not Located: 'La Quinta at the Base of Mount San Jacinto." in Country Life. Volume 55. November, 1928, p. 54. ARCHtIECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP 22 Archkaa, Planncrs & Conscma[ors, Inc. oo0445 r EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CAUFORNUI JUNE2006 Appendix A - Photographs of the Morgan House and Casa Magnolia. ARCHRTCLURAL RESOURCES GROUP Architecu, Plenn & Coa mtom, Inc. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA DUINTA RESORT LA DUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 1: This image is illustrates a classic example of a Monterey style residence. The characteristic elements are an asymmetrical facade, two-story massing, low-pitched gabled roof with red clay tile, a distinctive cantilevered second -story balcony covered by the princi- pal roof, exposed rafters, hewn beams, and simple wood posts. The typical wall finish is plastered, whitewashed, and roughly textured with rounded corners and edges. The Morgan House exemplifies the style. Even the relationship of all door and window openings and the location of the chimney is similar. Source: McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002. p. 430. 000"A11W EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 F� n. I. 6.. fx.o fa+.d.- 6fax, .6 x. i f. wad wiwilpt fInd dilwn. I. daft. R I. ).jig i6 9 dmrl MR 61d'f .m1 N pod of da Mr OW" Ffp grey. A8 1-UX . ix.Aviy .dfb. Lick, I& mi. 18. 1..f, 9m A. sd - ran an4W fiN. 16o am- pl. M"... 6b, I. a06 d. x. gr.1 aap g. iA d ml .i PMc.I.d.phia. m .V6.6u1d M. dry. fa 0xr and pio- 1 i ® rr Wo F b I W WAUMI M06aY1 40600N L INUrM AI=NI A IAOV6RA-11111*.0 WWIA Figure 2: These elevations of the Morgan House appeared in the article "Portfolio of Low -Cost Houses." in Architectural Record. Volume 74. November, 1933. p. 345-351. 0r0„! I", EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 F -'R _iT 11 L HO a MAUft MO q cOA00H I. YwrNAInl, A0.Qi11NCf u 90wA-1WQ. MJA MXUAAY, Im 149 Figure 4: This photograph and floor plans of the Morgan House appeared in the article "Portfolio of Low -Cost Houses." in Architectural Record. Volume 74. November, 1933. p. 345-351. 00045)0 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 5: East elevation of the Morgan House. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 6: The principal entrance at the east elevation of the Morgan House. The original studded wood door has been replaced with an aluminum and glass door. Note the scalloped plaster detailing of the surround. ARG Photograph dated May, 0 0 n A 4 (j 2006. v EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 7: Detail over the main entrance of the Morgan House. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 8: View looking north shows the south elevation of the addition between the original house and garage at the Morgan House. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 9: Exterior of the west elevation of the Morgan House. Compare to the image shown in Figure 1. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 10: View looking west from the second floor balcony of the Morgan House shows a garden feature with encroaching post 1980 residential construction beyond. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000 )3 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2000 d--- --- -- ---------------- ---- -- -- - E Figure 11: View looking northeast shows the sloping roof over the dining room at right, the original garage at rear (altered), the north courtyard, the roof of the existing garage at far left and a non -historic service building in foreground. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. f! Figure 12: View looking northeast from the second floor sleep- ing porch of the Morgan House shows original clay tile roofing in foreground and the upper wall of the original garage at right. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000 4 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 15: View of the driveway at the north side of the Morgan House, looking west towards the non -historic service building and free-standing garage (behind the trailer). ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 16: According to Louise Neeley, the palm grove adjacent to the north of the Morgan House was planted in 1919. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000, � EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 19: Detail view of glazed doors at the south side of the Morgan House living room. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 20: The east wall of the Morgan House living room retains original bookcase niches, which could be infilled to strengthen the structure. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000458 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 21: A new partition wall was inserted into the original living room space when the Morgan House was converted to l office use, circa 1980- ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. t Figure 22: Plaster was removed to reveal the adobe wall con- struction and concrete bond beams. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000451 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 23: Original wood flooring remains in place beneath the carpet in the Morgan House living room. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. P p Figure 24: The Morgan House retains nearly all original fittings and fixtures, including hardware. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000400 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 25: Typical wall grille for forced air mechanical system. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 26: This view of the Morgan House dining room illus- trates that nearly all original fittings and fixtures, including cur- tain rods, remain. Note the exposed beams at the ceiling. ARG J Photograph dated May, 2006. 1 VV0, 4ti11 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 27: View of the infill construction at the west wall of the original garage (formerly open for car access). ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 28. View of fireplace at the east wall of the garage. The fireplace was most likely installed when the garage was convert- ed to living space. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 0004614 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 29: Stairs to the second floor of the Morgan House. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 30: View of the second floor sleeping parch at the Morgan House, looking west. The floor plans included in the 1933 Architectural Record article (Figure 4) show that the win- dows were originally screened openings. The unbraced comer wing wall at the right will require structural retrofit. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA GUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 35: Limited areas of efflorescence in basement, Morgan House, ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 36: Standing water in the Morgan House basement is most likely to be from irrigation of grounds. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 ...... ._ ..._.__._. __:.----------- .._.... _..... .... Figure 37: West elevation of the southern wing of Casa Magnolia. The vast expanse of paving in the foreground marks the location of the original swimming pool. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 38: Original site walls remain in place. View is looking east from Avenida Obregon to the west elevation of Casa Magnolia beyond. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000481 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE Z006 Figure 39: East elevation of Casa Magnolia. The screened openings flanking the fireplace chimney are original features of the interior court- yard at the opposite side of the wall. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 40: The berm along the east elevation of Casa Magnolia causes irrigation water to pool along the foundation walls. The moisture is damaging the adobe walls, as seen in the southeast corner of the crawl space. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 41: Main entrance at the south elevation of Casa Magnolia. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. / Figure 42: Original cast iron fixture flanking the southern entry 1 door to Casa Magnolia. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000400 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 43: View of the north wing of Casa Magnolia, from the central courtyard. The original awning hardware remains; but the awning canvas has been replaced. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 44: View of the west elevation of the south wing of Casa t Magnolia, showing the original window grilles set in projecting conopial bays. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 60 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 45: One of the remaining examples of the original lou- vered wood shutters at Casa Magnolia Although the shutters have been removed from many of the other windows, the mount- % ing hardware remains. AP.G Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 46: The same type of louvered wood shutter and hard- ware was originally found at Morgan House. The mounting hardware remains at some of the windows. ARG Photograph t .__ dated May, 2006. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA DUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 47: North elevation of Casa Magnolia. Note the cor- belling under the windov., grille. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 48: View of adobe construction in the crawl space under the drawing roam in the south wing of Casa Magnolia. The adobe is in good condition, with the exception damage caused by water infiltration -- in the southeast corner ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000472 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA ,.,\ JUNE 2006 j- -------- --- -____ _ _ .._. _ . _ ___. ____. ______ __. _ _._._...._ _._. Figure 49: View of the adobe construction in the basement under the east end of the north wing of Casa Magnolia. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 50: View of delaminating plaster and adobe brick construction at the southeastern site wall, near the entrance gate. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000471 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 55: View of the eastern gable wall in the drawing room. The window opening and bookcase niches compromise the structural bearing capacity of the wall. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 56: Original door hardware remains throughout Casa Magnolia. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 0004 �� EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA pUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 57: Original handpainted tile floor in the original dress- ing room adjacent to the drawing room. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. Figure 58: Original handpainted tiles and plumbing fixtures in the bathroom adjacent to the drawing room. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000477 Ci EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 Figure 59: view of the bachelors' sleeping quarters in the south wing of Casa Magnolia. The batik wall coverings, brought from India by Mrs. Graham, are in good condition. ARG Photograph dated May, 2005. Figure 60: Original concrete floor with inlaid marble and alabaster designs in the bachelors' sleeping quarters. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000478 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CA41FORNIA JUNE 1000 Figure 61: View of the Cactus Room, looking east toward the niche in the gable wall Note the 17 foot high ceilings. ARG Photograph dated Mz\, 2006. Figure 62: Detail of painter and silver leaf murals in the Cactus Room. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 000479 EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA OUINTA RESORT LA DUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 I Figure 63, View of the dining room in Casa Magnolia, look- ing west. ARG Photocrapi, dated May, 2006. Figure 64: Original the floe pavers at the stairs between the dining and N,tchen, north va,^g of Casa Magnolia. ARG Photograph dated May. 2006. 4S. EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 2006 \� !.___.__.......... ______. Figure 67. View from the carriage house terrace. The awning framing is the same as in the historic image in Appendix D. f ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 1 Figure 68. View of carriage house from Avenida Obregon, look- ing southeast. Note the restroom addition at the east side of the carriage house. ARG Photograph dated May, 2006. 00048? EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT _ LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 Appendix B - State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 523 (DPRs) for the Walter Morgan House completed by Mellon and Associates, dated September 19,1997. I } ARcyaT:cruRAL RFsouxcEs Grow L Architects, Planncrs & Comss tots, Inc. n 0 U State of California — The Resources Agency DWAFtTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Coda. Primary 5 HRI 0 TruramtW - NRNP Status code Page_1 of 3 'Resource Narne or p: _ Walter MOrgau House M Other Identifier: " P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication D Unrestricted a. county Riverside b. usas 7.5' Quad La OurntaData 1980 TOSS • R O6E. SW 114 of SE/4 of sac 3b e.M. o.Addrass 49-499 Eisenhower Drive city La Quinta zip 92253 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large ruxilar linear teatufel zone _, mEl _,my a. Other Locations[ Data: 1e.9. parcel 7, legal nescription, directions W resource, e19Yahen, additional UTMs, em as appropriate] •P34. Descdptlan: (Describe resource and its major elements. Ioduds design, materials, condition, alterations, size, totting, and boundaries -I This Spanish Colonial Revival style house with Monterey influences is situated at the northwest end of the La Quinta Hotel and Resort property, just north of the Tennis Club pool. Designed by Gordon Kaufmann, it was built in 1926-27. Its ground plan is rectangular, with a projected room at the first floor western elevation. A two-story building, oriented on a north -south axis, with a garage structure at its northeast corner, it is side -gabled, with red the roof, deeply overhanging eaves and exposed rafters. The walls are adobe covered with plaster. The front of the house (cast elevation) has a slightly projecting north bay containing formal entry, a single door with a wide fascia stucco surround with scalloped detailing at lintel topped by a simple entablature. Above entry, at second story level, is a rectangular decorative the vent. The sotuhern=bay-eontains at second story level a French door which opens onto a shallow balcony with wrought iron railing and supporting entablature. At the northern cad of the eastern facade, a single story building with a porch covered by a shed roof supported by square columns extends to the east. The extension has a window in the middle of its south facade. (See Continuation Sheet) `M. Resources Attributes: (List attributes and codes, 1Ip5. Hotel/Motel _ 9 sources Present: ®Building ❑Structure DObisct osae p0istiet ❑El a iof District _ .. w1 .,. } ..� '";, 1. _ _ _ ❑Other owlatas, etc.[ P5b. Desviption of Photo: (view, date, atc.) -PB. Date Consvuoted/Age and Source,. -'' ""' • ' , ' ; =- - ❑ Prehisioric W Historic ❑ slid[ Plea *;.:n `1926-27: City of La on tw_- n.=r_.=1'`:,rk,'fM1* iis[oricComex[ temont 1996 •P7. OWaer and Addrem !P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey reporttotne., sours or'�:or.e') `Attachments: ONONE olocation Map DArchaeological Record DDist"10 Record ❑Photograph Record ❑Other: Wst) 56-140 PGA Blvd - La Ouinta CA 92253 P—Private •PB. Recorded byt(Name, affiliation, address) Pam O'ConnorfMaroy Roth Mellon and Associates Riverside. CA 'P9. Date Rodwded: J119tI997 Via. Survey Typs:41)estabe) S ;drag k4op 9 Continuation Sheet IN Building, Structure and object Record L:-ear Pe-ure Record ❑ M66ng Station Record ❑ Rock ArtRecord oArtifaM Recort{� A A a DPR 523A (1/95) 'Required Infvmation q� t _ ) State of California — The Resources Atiency ----- Primary k _- 04PARTMEhIT DF$AiWS AND RECREPTION NR1 N - - BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT FIFCOR'Q _ *•e==o. -' *NRHP Status Code 'Resaace Noma or a: Walter Morsmn House __ 81. Historic Nama: 82. Common Name: 83. Original use: Residence Bd. Present Use: C—CORUfIelCldl *us. Ammtect ual Style: Spanish Colcntal liaFival with Monterey influences *86. Construction History: iConstrdetion date, alms: oes, sod dare of aitooi fom,) Built in 1926-27, this house was desiI by Gordon Kaufilatm and built by local craftsmen with materials of local manufacture. The exterior of di:: house is intact; interior has few, superficial alterations. *87. Moved? ONo ❑Yes lit Uoknovvn pale_ _ __Original Location: *88. Related Features: We. Arch tact-, Gordon Kaufmann _ _ _ b. Builder: Unknown *810, Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area LA Guinta Period of Sigraficance 192&27 __ _ Property Type Residence Applicable Criteria B, C IDiecusa Importanaa in terms of Nsmricel or c:chi;,:Agic l cc :tax[ as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address enegrity.i The Walter Morgan House appears eiigiblz for designation as a City of La Quints Landmark under Criterion C, i.e., it embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, peiod or method of construction, is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmaaship or is representative of a notable work on an acclaimed builder, designer, or aichitza. The house also appears eligible for the National Register_Of9istoric Places under Criterion C., i.e., it embodies ' dia distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of COristruction, or that represent the work of a :vaster, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.' Locate d,on the 1 outskirts of the La Guinta Hotel prop.�rty, thr house was desiened in the Monterev style ante sitm rn Style" d_ _ were tir?�tvic. The structure :osseses a high Qegree of arc 'tetaura! integrity as an wrote examp e t the work of prominent Southern Califorcia 8ichitect Gordon Kaufmann. Tlie house may also be eligible for the National Register under Criterion B :or iti association with Walter Morgan, developer of the La Quinta Hotel. 811. Additional Roseurca Attributes: (list ettnbufes a. u cnriosf HP5. Hotel/Motet '612. References: 813. Remarks: *Bea. evaluator: Pam G'Connor_ auto of Evaluation: 09A)1 i 1997 _ (this space reserved for o51.oa1 v n uis APR 5238 (1195) *Required information 451 i } --W1e iesE1Agency JI'A— —_- — Primay 9 V(tOW fTPAIKSAND-ECPEAT10N NFS lFPONi5LTItySHEET y Trinortual - - - - wy.=a. rtacoraeo uy rat: v �vtutorne.t:arCy Nora *Date 10119fl997 ®continuation OUpdate -Resource Name art #-- Walter Moman moUSe _- Pia. (Coat.) The house's south elevation has an exterior chimney topped by a decorative finish with tile vents and brick crown. A shed roof with red tiles covers a porch and rests on a wood beam supported by three heavy Doric columns. The chimney is flanked at first floor level by two doors and at second floor level by a casement window ou its eastern side. The west elevation (rear of the building with view towards mountains) has a balcony running length of facade at second story level, wish square wood slatted railing and wood posts supporting porch roof and exposed rafters on underside of balcony. At second floor, French doors open onto balcony at northern end, while two small casement windows occur at southern end. On first floor, French doors occur at the northern end and a large casement casement window sits in mid-cemer of southern end. The north elevation has casement windows with unpainted wood sash at second floor level, topped by wood planking to the eaves. First floor north elevation has a door at east end and three irregularly placed casement windows. A low wall extending north from the west end of facade, partially enclosing a courtyard formed by north wall of main building, northern addition (originally the garage) and a third low wall running east -west. Features of the courtyard interior include a shed roofed arcade along west wall of the garage, the -faced circular gutter openings below the flat roof of the west elevation, and a fireplace built into the northern courtyard wall. The exterior of Morgan House rct2o s its historic fabric and character -defining features in their___ ,. entirety. Interiors of the house also retain their original configuration and most of the original finishe_s. DPR 5231. 11195) -Required atformaoon 00456 } EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT ` - LA QUINTA, CALWORNIA JUNE2006 Appendix C - State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 523 (DPRs) for La Casa completed by Mellon and Associates, dated September 20,1997. J ARCHITECLURAL RESOURCES GROUP Archiie , Plannris & Caasav+to , Inc. 000487 State. of Cabforrda -- The Resources Agency DPYARTMfiNT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Othar Lisunyc —_ Review Coce NR Statur DadeI - Pn9s _ of _ — •Rasource Name or tl: La Cash pl. Dow Identifier: `P2. Location: 0 Not for Pubficsdor. pUnreaaictea a. Co4nty Riygrside b. USQS 7.6' Quad I -a Ouinta _-_Data 190 r ii; _, R 06�E �W tta of SGva of sac 36- c. Addraas 49-499 Eisenhower Drive La Ouinta zip 92253 d.Oth (Gate more than one for taiga alq t ine4v featrel Zone _ ' a. Other Lacadoral Data, ta,g, paraai p, ts; a! descrptian, dasoAens ;o r,:curse. elevation, addidonai UTMs, etc. as appropriate) rutiJ `P3a. Description: (Oeacuba resacrca and its mal¢r alemants. induce design, „crisis, Condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) La Casa is a complex Of ttve adobe trick buildings and a cotat aid, all in the Spanish Colonial Revival style, surrounded by a low adobe wall situated at the extreme sect?:,cast corner of the La Quints Hotel and Resort. All have stucco cladding. li appears to Bate from th; 1920'S, but apparently has not been documented in arebitectural journals of the period; no period photographs 1, t.e been found. Since no dotaunentation was located, the Original purpose of the buildings remairs unknf vn. As it was sited a distance away from the main hotel, as were the Walter Morgan and Cyrus Pierce Houses, is may have functioned as a resort residence. The two buildings are oriented on art east -west axis, and forte tee north and south boundaries of the courtyard, The east and west courtyard boundaries are fanned by low std.:;O walls, the western wall tntornamented and containing an opening nnttn die courtyard. The eastern courty,aj wall contains a fireplace with chimney at its midpoint, [latticed by deeplg lecessec wood casemerd opening_ with the surfaced stucco seats below. (See Continuation Sheet) 'Pea. Resources Annbutaa lust tn.o,.:c..••,; oos I , .Fie sultiluuel --- ilr � & 'tin" *��.- �,?' i "' Elam¢nt of OistrfcY ❑Omer flsolates, ¢tc.) P61a. Oescripton of Photo: 1View, date, atc.) •P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: s`f5 pfrehist"ic aHiatoric ❑Roth _1920'S: City Of La Ouinta Historic __o uegl statement 1996 ` `P7. Ownar and Address: -- KSL a 6 5140 PC}A Blvd `- _ L'a Quinta. CA 92253 _ _P—Private - - •Pa. Recorded by:(Name, affiliation., address) PdinO'COnnodMarcy Roth ,.; Mzllan gild ASSOCia[e$ s: <: RtverS[de CA `P9. Data Recorded: rj120i1997 *FIG. Survey Typa: tt)gsaTe) — --- --- =— -- -- -- — — — — ` ' C- Comprehensive survey --_ `P11. Report Citation: Kite survey ml UtUorher sources or "rutne',: CityUf Ls. C, uirug _ Historic COntrx[ S emattt 1996 j 'AttachrtrenU: pNOiJE ❑Location iieH --Sketch kiap V Cc:,: ahorr Sheet ❑Building, Structure and Object Record 1 ;.t Archaeological Record rJ Distrier Recertl i�Lul¢.: eamiaR cord 3 Station Record DRock ArtResod pArtifea Recor ❑Photograph Record 00thee; !Lis;; DPR U23A I1196) f� J4 88 'Required infart ' ; State.ofC@lif«nia-Tfr>: iiesoureea Agan�t -_--'— -----'- -- DEPAWMENT OF PARkS AND ItEcAFATtoN- _� CONTINUATION SF1Er~T Page 2 or 6 `Recorded by PamRodr - - - 'pare 1 !20 1 97 - : 'Raeource Name or d: La Casa '— Faeanamdoo ❑Update Na. (Cont.) The building situated alceg e Hord: side of i.:. courtyard, "HI Laibreri," has an irregular rectangular ground plan, ',.ith sitght p:eic<tions alp.:, its north waft. Its ma elevation, the south facade, presents two elevation'-i, a single sror; , plain „sde with central double door opening at the west end, and an asyrruaetrical, 2-stow face e ;with a lo. , stucco-walfed, stepped entry to a single arched door at its west end and an r;tYericI srarrwar across :,',u facade leading east to a second -story covered landing toward the east end. A sta=0 piar-rer with trim extends east from the stucco entry along the length of the exterior stair. The second -story iarta:..: has a flecaratve tile vent in its southern wall. The exterior stairway has a decoran ve siacco step paste a along its bottom edge Underneardh the stairway is a low ceilinged entry area widi two rectangular t.r,l one arched nlclre and a side door- At its c door opening a fete steps below ground level. Decorative east end, the two-story facade has a srrtgi wood brackets support the shallow second -story overhang, N.,':;ch has a large square central window, with metal grille. The second building, which forms tote south and part of the .r. and is comprised of two t o+nponents, a nvo-story, si sides of the courtyard, is L-shaped ude kabl•_: rengtdaz structure immediately adjacent to a smaller, one-story srructore, both ork;Ued east w!'ectaand a smeller, single story rectangular structure oriented north -south 'wd proj<cling no: t courtyard-facigg elevations of built bttildinss are ut.omamen < elaborate ornamental wrought iron into the courtyard. The northern, save for an exterior staircase with an railing, ;.aiat:d•ile d`co,s toward the eastern end of the east -west building :d risers and plain We treads which runs to :. landing .• room. An interior stucco cbitmtey capped try a nich abuts the entrance to the "I acjl .:ion -slyly roofline at midpoint. Entrance to north -south is ,wen rises from the north elevation wings via a s:.,gle door at Borth elevation. r - Exteriors of beta buildings appear u, retail, their b ..Mori;. fen .'tea, 1 the courtyard wall. A Ixrge, tile -toped tab:e in c with little or no alteration, as does e; ter of ce yard appears to be a later addition. Thee main in room of a of tine 'La Sala" roost sl in the main room ea:a r�.air most of : steeply pitched wool original historic fabric, which consists ceiling vith wort supported spiral and wrWtol bracke.; :tvsses, an octagonal fireplace hood d- d CascLs t :he firephs heavy wood -shuttered c semen[ will i:, the B st wall. A c...ble [Hain leads appears to be unused at present), and a arched doorway in room into a pantry, veldt ,)firir:.ii wo, •d - abinets z>. black and white concentric diamon l west wall of distinctive tile floor hand -punted in a attern. The inerio< Of": details. "Cactus" Room has no Outstanding oPR 623L hiss) 00,1489 'Required infmn ti n State at Caiitvmfa —lyre Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Primary 6 iRI K Trinorniai Pees 3 at 6 "Recorded by Pam O'Cornc_Aklu vRoth mate 10f20)1997 6Con6 Ovation "Resource Neme or rt: La Casa 6 Update La Casa; "El Laibreri," south eie-a:io;: DP9 523L 01951 000490 •Repuasd information SIqxD4NTJNUATtON te at ca6f.Qrr4a - The f asomcgs Agen<.ry ------ T- - - .. PARTMENT UP' PARRS AND_ RECREA7fcN Rimary SHEET Hill C ^— Trirwmia( _ Page 4 at O 'Recorded by Pam O'COP", f lf— ' Rodi *Dow 0 _Q 1997 •Resource Name or R: La Casa La Casa, 'La Saia,"north elevado:. DPR 523L (1199) 11 Continuation Oupdate 0004gi 'Rorpdrad fniormmion Stag of EWlnua:77110 P"Wrcas Agency -----------, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIM Primary $ CONTINUATION SHEET__ TRmm iai —�— rase 5 of 6 Racoread ny Pam 0111 :(itiarcv Reth roaeo 1620/i997 •Resource Name ar 6: l..a CaSa — ®Cmllim,tion 0updare La Casa. courtyard — ------------ - Wil � 23L 111951 - - --- - - 00049? sRayuken inf nna9oa i � ♦Y Ds>a o6COMMIa — Tha ReeonrcW Agv'ilcy .aYARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION +JBI - { CORtTIIUUATI(il�t SHEET�- Pa9a 6 or 6 'Recoraaa ey Pam 2_�cnno:. -. arcy Roth -Date 10/20/1997 'Reso ca Name or Biconrinuatinn uUpaate La Casa; courtyard { OPR 523L 11a5) 000493 'Repurea info no"j EVALUATION OF ADOBES AT LA QUINTA RESORT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA JUNE2006 Appendix D - Stow -Fithian, Anne. "At the Very Edge of the Desert" in Home and Field. Volume 42. February, 1932. ' ARCHITECTURAL RFSOURCFS GROUP i Architects, Planners Eq Consmators, Inc. 000,194 AT THE VERY EDGE OF THE DESERT ANNE STOW FITHIAN V AHAI Is :.n•,.•n .n Ih.. 1 �dm xd•Ilrsctt u. J 1'al dot me is a w,d, .alley, Irclow s•a le.rl, eallwl C••a.helts, a .mrupiion of ". unrhdla" nmanmg little shell. � In agfs past. this rrgim, which still abouudr in shrlle, wa. part of the Cull of Cali Imnia 1 Off (tin vallrl and sat rat from the Faltmi Sea lic a sandy wash and oauvou prute.lyd b, a semi ,uvula, spu, of tho Santa Kos. Niounlxius Thi, pea.,eful and seemingly rrwote =itc was : h:wn :u the emplarun,w of an hnu:f .,,it roitagrs named '7a Quints * Inrcan ing a unwary ptw k.mri..star'. m dm. 1inrtiu11 m the pn.pertr of a peasanU. Itttigig Ire, k. gn.und for the devrlopmenl rrrat(d Ou it, CORDON Kuen+e.N nrsa•Nro not •mh the hold I'm also half it dozen pri.atell owned dw rllings, one u( which. or, the van edgy of lhr Desert. to Casa Map nolia. by fat the most impnllaut and mdnidual hvusr them, •,.ned by Nits Lnc Elexnnr q,aha... To the building of a .1,.rl house she ha- br,mghl .ca.s of rn perienur as an iNrrint dn'nrator, y,urn of Ir.n el ,unl study. kern ,bsenalion, originaDlr and la>o• "Ihr result is startlingly hrauliful and u,h in the uncs pMed, in harmony with it, drarnxli, surrom,dinxs. and pra,lical I... It[, in a h:.l. dr) and vnncuuus windy climate. The architect suh rd Ili, problrm> Thal .nf.... red hum wW, admit,blr di ratnes, and Ihr HOME L vi6tr Rdrrahinp an �. hen, m Ihr rhu u( Ih, tiro-. <.I in lahfonua�[ loaa hellfl Nnllr. rLir ran,b6na h...ne of \t r., i rr 4;hwnur Lnrharn .. Iwrlirnlflrlr ddiphtlul One of Ihr u.r:., aixnr. hwk._ a. tl.. �anu li..w \luur.- Iam Thr Vhudreralrh lwlow •.hu.. I hr h..uwr w ;I It it. shr.dr,I pnt h. nn.l r hr... iruln ir.a n•+d f EBRUARY .aft a1 All inpfnf...ra arrinlrfmnll Of Nvnir.gy ptvea m the palm xrlmme MW frxn. the Joaen +nn. )rl alY.wa Ihf hr.'rm GJI Llxl- Wl.ilr w.14, ptnYfaM rmaf litre, w;Lfr BYKKInK• Llu. blin.rr liir. on U,r Ixl.lr 1•rr.rnlh Ihr ...pprr A...1, G,nn Ohl, rnla. uhranr New Orl...... .....aril... I.J llw iron Lxhntrwlr I hr Ilrarrl N.n•m.. Aural du....Ler of amply ...... liun•. ra rial.wn G•f1 In ILr d.lp•' '1 hr r11x.a.J .. x..l i. LmvY-.•Joy rvt pin.. in f..nlrnxt In N Ho•.r of IY.lielrrd LIafY .on. .nir wl xiJ, wlrru ral6r+lrnl KIx.. um- ,xu> dr.ipn.l h1 Ihr .•ry h.l,r1, 6onhm Y n.fnmon f6r wa14. airo.. a+r.-Kr,m d.. J.., hN•. Ixrr. IuiutrJ an plx-Irr hr Ila•1J Ind.+lug in hrilliaw Jrvrl a doro 1 n..l. tr o.•i, rll nu+Irn. furnil ury of pirU.d .•uY n YI oll h. fx.n .-..lo.nl b�.lurv. ••hF�L •. r.. �. Lul for Ih. dry omlum_ .J Ilu e ..II- Irro•h e�o.l..x-Kh. oo lh. .dh. ....rr..,.. .. .... a .....+. .......... . 00049"7 D HOME G FIELD hallu,ad, .•( >uY rnl. a ��terpna.•J h, suah n•galr!e L:amua a- tit, solida, of adult, welts' at Yore , .lot fully r.fl curl I lbust 'flif HJtut I h111It Yf Ia19, adobes Wilk- plaster,,] and Whitt ..-Aral, Rah pinkish hnndnmJ, nw( tiles, and is if, two doadwd units ,]tidy h" so aua, I. The Itn.ms in th,v- units, o, hmldings. ,nn d ,.,ions heights and sires= and Yn diRervnl le,ela. tending nalumally A- iNroding and ImAw nN.( liuPs Thue;r IwY par, art lied loxes hr, h, walls, Ihpmb, fuming If Iarpr m,l.med patio nllith i.. die I of Yf dour• hl in:; nmw. A "in m ,u the xM- tit, du'c,vni from "hid. ••o..R: ' -, : I, ehimm"Itig -Rimming pool reined for bpi ah,at tit, lexn- :nul Faulefm painl,d Amami.- blur and IQWd w mgltl W, thr wal•t - ?uda•r b, -RR, led nron light, The path .,A.•t- p,l thia pn d I,- Ih, rRI,..Rr FRI, which is s,l in III, fax if m fo•,l Ralf I4a mint Iht ,..>a"I b,mndafl of the p:Irl,. I. the aril .tnd dl m.dr Ypp•,-if, III. nut e,mr.• .A,: k Ile• ndna Iill" xaff lath -II .I,, ,qm„ i.,pfaru iv Ihr middle &A,d b, h.n e,J14 RA .6nuun.l wnnk•x. dupusit .. bi.I. ..n,. . ,It inhu-l. A-" .p,, . Ihn ,hang.- ro,r fanll! iu l,"", n,I ,• I. , I if, ;.fill I'llif,,- ox our and rn l:ne•f xa: I.. I I, pin, YI•rb ,. 47v. II-..,q•,u..l r, ,u . Thi. ItYlian drN wing-nw.o h.. a Ais- Iiw1La, frorliunN.ly well rL.wwn fornil err nnA ,ol..rn pmp,:Jy hlu.drNt R'all. are Rkil«, thr cdbnR Y( pioi LNl ..Ni, the tile. lolwrr,• lrcn..n Ya Yrr NLn Ihr tin«IS L.nnclAnot«:..fu,. fhc W.11 pu0 u nc..11ew,n4 i...r.f t l nuuL LIY.. I n n ,.trhr i. Y M..I...na with Ik.wrr. YI her feet Nn.l a hlltu I:RhI c.nulYnd, n,np Thr okI IWi:,r Ivop. N.u. in.Yol.... Yuh._,pine, Form ..R .. .u...w Ina iRn.anA. Ih. wall. n:r tu,n, twu f.vl In Iha r.ud p,Yi FEBRUARY 1132 � hurler la.irwnn..Ix.Yr. in th.. narth n ..E L..hx fmm the .e<ond IRxn np, .Iron and p. ti... 9hr n.11-.ry vhilr pi..l rr. MlinR P,lu. rYln_. M-1.1e -la Ir. Wit fit ron Tani in I hr Hw.r..rr . rr:.ah of �ea.d ratl.rlin. hI . A.r. G.- hum. Lin".1d p....1......h rurtfno. make . s...l nalinM fn. 11i, xuli..... Iw ntr,l 11.1611 Ir.l. Highl.. came...! It., unurusl All<he... 11, rlfrri i. \I.rriu... %ith I.... i.i. ..nd .lrrY..n Ill.-- hi the .o.r.. ru.h xad hrnilr.. 1 h. .irvl.i. ..I.:.vrxhn i> n4rnhn�.l1 I n.ldvu hvhulul r Y4mi.h H.x.l c.ill. •1 V V 489 f Ep Au er 11r I , s . At the Desert's Edge ,c F....., F.r I. It ..,r. u.!r: luwes nd 6.p•_ : �hn n I .ridenr .an a an mynnn.r = r L, ' p^�• arn•� will ,ru hg. . eIe mop, Tb, zrom,ri :., ra e.i wall pinkla «h., If.agacnra 'ha, rune halm ,he m...... i d,r 10 .n 4. 01.. . m y,e!. A.errnr a un% mbar, Y,al rflr.1• v,a •,hrr ,a of rn '.=-1 and I.. , Ihe,, {- rr Ar-,. a:,rk•.rmrm ,ell J-e.a . f"Im, If I,n mw.re r I m. , me u„m, rl if., .'ll. II.y:1e And...glnaf m n,W'p th, q emm-Ih .lab III., Yw I. place, rf wnf..'e pour ulln,d .onrretr, the mp I.14A .0, \71n,r. hn.lnoorbbm Wn of inxenae .hap, lh. III,'. anp p,r.d by Iria,ed legs wnh aapilala ri Homvepue <han.el % .anagm iron Italian gulle I, L,.Jt ..all h.m the gar,., nd. and . yan i..... .ailing .L�„w .1 .nre a„,, ..mini a Nrw Orleans -1.,r m.,ku rooms :be Imluur..ly of .Iv ,..n,.x Hi,h, : f o', I.adl.s, la .he do mg ,noon. In .nlw.r n, u.nlh,nn. or,eI. 1.. io. m .I.d b, If, =fiellrw .idr, .ilw I .pa that g,. .14,0, m . am..mg w,den g,illm kb,h,o Jam 71.e s.eps, par, „f a fl,µh, 1 mdrecrrd m. Iryr. .fir ..If and vq•p-nrJ in .Jdidan I•, n flu. mlv.:..g an b ,ndn .hirb ie 1.ra11 Inr flower su u,grm. ur Tlaa a, dgh,I anglra and Pn _ _a h, as , Indmnm 4n .. hr. ....."in, Irame all IIII' pain < Imyne,.dv ,r.i. i, .t rirr,h pal I. frnm of the hrrpia[e alp,.. whirl. arras III, famnoe dy,[n A.I. fed t.i.kna kll aWul are nm.b.n.We chair= rod .4., and .n.bi••na III,, no any', Hrry all ham..... Tne a,m...... ... .a a ge1 1., Ime, „I the Vanish [ n 1,m. but la a,, tell III h I n odn frami it la wnnb, �! wale el, moa d .he n.moinle .-,ad d: , nunnnyr: , uuc from 11t immc dt.tr nd,hbo,h,md or w.,, made nn rh, ;-1 1.. ?1reicao and Imlian cuflemrn It.,m baked ed„Lt 1,,,. As, ...f ribs ad .,,, he,,, rb.ero.do,d fl,,,r I , Th, of 1, k 4,rd nn rmimly H., gn,un•1, sal IIIIIr ed by lawn, and :ng m.,mdiaa wall. wid, of d rh„m inn desyr. fly, Ianu.Gully IIY, III. • mwairy s Thr r..br psbne m law •.:nrl. one ail, A.& blending with au III., and &fr, II'.W a• he. adhered ,:d:ne .Jura .haanghmn the hwlar 'fur .nsra. err . ,a s gnr,I rhaml.[r hr: rmghl -A. by . +hiring hellrvw,m r lwanrieM fey 1•+ u.r.Y rwn n•+-- N.a ., . ,:.I t ud.vn aline in ,d pine The Id.A ......... inn: �,A a,. .[. =ivrrn r,l aaer anJ «pmre , n14A yn Vo.v • aratl � V, 6a Ira-,r the u•,r; n. I it uIu I.",wnrllnlam the . u+ Mum= I. m 'ne"d be ime Ylwi+lr dean- . .. ,1 + geld . ,oda<n.ja n.Lmdn and n,aa•o- the lurndy' „( ,r,I1,A .a, with Ixwn-s oiwrd mnu,,,l= i, rno ,ieeafile n,epl III.. I t- .!Ightl, umd. rrnia!i• u,d cmiuly ..nli>fa.arn and 41r11nrIAhIY. Ili, r+ a Jrcum IMm I. alert' I. belweer Inx,F. r,.lnred h,el, and a ddigfit m wh,.d, ,..wkcn erhh ,II, deer. dawn hhmn, .firough .ht half drawn ,.nnao.. and r,fl,rtrd farm gleaming walla fin a 1"d wah ..I real to the Plot, Hon. end op.mr.g min the pa,o, is a small bu hdor Anal remm, the wales all wield, In, r,n,rcl wnh hank by Kobilid, Tx. l u u.x ra. all,,. aww . h.11 ,1., from 6,, ......I .a in th. arm[ ana.h an winp and haa, m Its bean,/ol or. pnni.me. I,., deg.rce in the old a repted meaning of .ha, term It is tw.nyahrrr feet b. Lary 4n and lw 1.11I.. fey. 11 lLe ridgep,le Whilel walla, a lobauo-bma,v .Ir floor. in., rxa al In,. sub Farrah blue lour: pre domm..... .mflrwo,k. a hooey <olnr,d ..A rtilm, .mI b,own wend i ork m.Ar fr, reWw[ sod Innrmuman all the out The mo,. ,.,newmrfiy feamr, in thn room III greet ynnliy i. .h, mmmlpia.e, Ih, a rr[d warden lard of whirh. logethra wi,h .hr pink merhl. hn.k ,, sad rnga,ed rnb.mn, are I.,o, work Yrm.... hapan. Tahl,, cbaira lammand plea" b"ll..r add and III , . and perf..ly ph,,d la, I end #1 , I•aorled .mlJc .haler,.- end V,oeaia. I blinds np6r, r nuisw aral dlrria.<' wood., light and glare d, our end rbmhlr doors lead w MI, Crap.." inw r,ifh.gai heal .uJ Jrns,ng rwn ! .he I,mininll...(.,hirb n.nrawa ahwpl, i I with the dmwbal „ r r. a.d .h. reall I • Ihr h....ee whirh i. parrr.Jnrly nmdo, I,,el and Ore frnm ,unam,o,a i the Jimat room k'n,ban I,ilh gariee ynaneo, and a m.arer bedrm,m, u1, n a Mere... Itml in the order I' meA nThe d,mn, ,wain, Inn, and ran raw. h.a a Iw roof of ewkr ay inesi, '..lord a anh larendrrbltee. and h.l-I' low hdoa.r.d.1 a,ln leading to be karhm simpl@nY is again ,d .rr,hen, bung obtained , by ml lien. roughs ham ramp. ha.m,e and .ails,.,, I � end by Spanish and Ingrown ,J'n I. 1•h, kiand a {igaun in rye Tm I' niaian d a,, . n tile. nomund the sink and wines, end ,h[ rdrigaarm n.nrnied by Iuin.N M.»n,L gr.11ts 1'.. rasrr. asmnow on the hlgbn: 1-rT. rommamL. widr air . it.;walla of whnr planw , I.... i plane bk 'hd.es, ,nu m the �)i,i.af Sp..,W, lh.n h.I, of -A in gm.al u, 11m , .riling is of leak! [YV.ras, and rhr flan .1 wl.n, n.dd, rinb, wllc,d Iry rhr, , .I.: 1 pal Ld 4 b.•l .. rdan , Ivniyir all ' !1 Ilal'vr lefh!If . r^. 'ol.; vrb paro-tl a .,' I! rmr.nln uer i.l_ I .,. star .k. • 000500 APPENDIX B Traffic Ipact Analysis (2006) 000501 Endo Engineering Traffic Engineering Air Quality Studies Noise Assessments January 8, 2007 Mr. David Urban Vice President of Planning and Development CNL Hotels & Resorts, LLC CNL Center II at City Commons 420 S. Orange Ave., Suite 700 Orlando, Florida 32801-3313 SUBJECT: La Quinta Resort and Club EA 2006-573 and Site Development Permit 2006-865 Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Urban; The La Quinta Resort has been successful, partially because the Specific Plan provides for a flexible development that is capable of responding to changing market conditions. However, to effectively compete as a destination resort hotel in the region, the La Quinta Resort must continue to revitalize and enhance the ancillary on -site facilities that serve resort guests. The La Quinta Resort must also pursue new recreational amenities that will appeal to a wider demographic in the leisure market and increase guest room bookings on an annualized basis. The intent of the currently proposed project is to do that by capitalizing on the facilities at the resort that make it successful, and introducing new facilities that provide an attractive recreational experience for a more family -oriented market in the summer months, when the resort occupancy is typically lowest. In this manner, the proposed project will permit the resort to more fully utilize a higher percentage of its vested entitlements. The La Quinta Resort Specific Plan provides zoning and development regulations for a range of land uses on the 622t acre La Quinta Resort site. The proposed project is a request for a Site Development Permit to replace a portion of the existing tennis courts and dedicated children's play areas as well as the existing hotel swimming pool with a major water feature. The proposed changes are designed to reduce the seasonal variation in the occupancy rate of the guest rooms by attracting younger families with children to the resort during the summer months and holidays when schools are not in session. An initial application submittal package was forwarded to the City of La Quinta for EA 2006-573 and Site Development Permit 2006-865. To complete the application submittal, the City asked that the potential implications of the proposed project on parking, circulation, and local traffic conditions be addressed. The following pages evaluate and document the potential parking, circulation, and local traffic impacts associated with the proposed modifications to the existing ancillary recreational facilities on 7.4 acres at the La Quinta Resort & Club in the City of La Quinta. 28811 Woodcock Drive, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677-1330 Telephone: (949) 362-0020 FAX: (949) 362-0015 0000O'� ^) Project Description The proposed project will replace a portion of the existing tennis courts, the dedicated children's play areas, and the main hotel swimming pool (located in the western portion of the La Quinta Resort) with a major water feature. As shown in Figure 1, the proposed improvements will include: an arrival plaza and waterfall fountain at an entry building, a new formal signature swimming pool and whirlpool with ten adjacent cabanas, a water slide (constructed of sculpted gunite with rock veneer), a wave pool with a video projection screen, a splash -down pool, a lazy river (which passes through a canyon, a cave, and under a stone veneer bridge), and a toddler pool with a nearby pop jet fountain and play structure for youngsters. A small enclosed game (arcade) room would be provided as well as a lounge terrace, a loggia, wood decks, paths, extensive landscaping, decorative plantings, and new lighting fixtures. Although the existing resort facilities do not include a maintenance storage area, one will be provided with the proposed project. The entire area will be enclosed within a gated pool enclosure fence that will allow fire lane access. The proposed modifications will affect Parcel 1 of Parcel Map. No. 29724 and Lots 2, 3 and 6 of Tract No. 28545-1 in Riverside County. The project will replace nine of the existing tennis courts (in Lot 6) and the existing tennis stadium and center court as well as a restroom building (in Parcel 1), and the outdoor swimming pool (in Lot 3). The existing bar/restaurant, tennis/fitness clubhouse, and the Morgan House (which is currently closed) will remain on -site. Upon project completion, thirteen of the twenty three existing tennis courts will remain for resort guests and club members. The proposed modifications will not alter any of the hotel rooms or change the existing off- street parking supply. Although the number of parking spaces is expected to remain essentially unchanged, twelve parking spaces may need to be relocated to accommodate the j gated entry improvements required along Avenida Obregon. To control the flow of traffic near the proposed water feature, improvements will be constructed along Avenida Obregon, south of Avenida Fernando. These improvements will include a raised median (10 feet wide and 50 feet long) with a turn -around area designed to facilitate the loading and unloading of hotel guests and club members using the water feature. In the event that, after monitoring the water feature in operation, the City of La Quinta requires Avenida Obregon to be gated to control access to the water feature, the raised median on Avenida Obregon can accommodate a parking attendant station. The proposed La Quinta Resort and Club water feature amenity will be open daily between Memorial Day and Labor Day from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM. It will be open on weekends through the remainder of the year. In addition, the water feature will be open during Thanksgiving week, from Christmas through New Year's Day, on Presidents' Day weekend, and for one to three weeks during Spring Break. The proposed water feature is designed to be a private gated ancillary recreational amenity for use by guests of the La Quinta Resort. The proposed water feature will not be open to the general public and is not intended to function as a theme park or public water slide park. Public water slide parks sell tickets to the public and allow unlimited access to water slides, wading pools, refreshment stands, and picnic areas. The major water feature and other related ancillary recreational facilities to be constructed, are designed to help the resort appeal to and attract a wider and better balanced share of the marketplace. The new amenities are expected to attract younger families to the resort and generate more guest room bookings, particularly in the summer months, when the average monthly occupancy rate of the resort typically drops. 2 0 0 0 b � I C A� r-1• \' CD C V/ CD 'F 1 (T ti f nY u 1 .. .. •v3: a. OpUCUIOJ ep!"v l I - 1 _ 04 Use of the water feature will be limited to hotel guests staying at the La Quinta Resort Hotel and a select number of individuals who participate in the exclusive Club Membership Program associated with the La Quinta Resort & Club. Unlike the existing tennis and exercise facilities, the water feature will not be made available in a joint facilities sharing program with other hotels. To do so would eliminate the incentive for guests of other hotels to book rooms at the La Quinta Resort Hotel. The Existing La Quinta Resort The La Quinta Resort & Club is a legendary retreat and meeting destination resort, renowned for 80 years for its charm and serenity. It features internationally recognized golf courses and a world -class spa and fitness center. It offers a variety of indoor and outdoor recreational amenities including: 23 tennis courts, 42 pools, 52 hot tubs, five restaurants and 800 guest rooms tucked away in charming Spanish -style casitas. Approximately 200 nearby tennis villas participate in a rental program administered by the hotel during the peak season. The La Quinta Resort appeals primarily to business travelers, conference attendees, and mature leisure travelers who appreciate the tranquillity. Hotel guests tend to frequent the golf or tennis facilities, take advantage of the Spa La Quinta, and enjoy the upscale dining establishments on -site. The proposed project would promote a more balanced customer mix of business travelers and leisure guests, groups, families, and individuals. Although individual business travelers typically book rooms on weekdays, families tend to book vacations during the months when schools are not in session (the off-peak season at the La Quinta Resort) and on weekends. In the peak season (January through April) the hotel occupancy is relatively high and the resort often achieves full occupancy on the weekends. However, the average monthly occupancy rate in the off-peak season is substantially lower, indicating a need to appeal to a wider demographic in the leisure market. The provision of a new major water feature on - site is viewed as a means of improving the hotel occupancy, particularly in the summer months, without increasing the existing entitlements of the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan. The proposed change in the ancillary recreational amenities will allow the La Quinta Resort to make more consistent year-round use of its existing entitlements. Historical Occupancy Rates Seasonal variations in destination resort hotel occupancy rates are typical. Figure 2 shows the average monthly occupancy rates for the La Quinta Resort since the year 2003. Occupancy rates for the La Quinta Resort and Club, reviewed for the four-year interval from 2003 through 2006, indicate that during the peak season (January through April) the resort is operating with average monthly occupancy rates of 75 percent, with the guest rooms achieving full occupancy on weekends. However, during the off-peak period (between Memorial Day and Labor Day) and during the December holiday season, the resort experiences a substantial drop in the average monthly demand for room bookings. The average monthly occupancy rate for the summer months (June, July, and August) over the last four years was 48 percent. During the summer months, traffic volumes on the streets of La Quinta are also substantially lower than the traffic volumes during the peak season (winter and spring). Any change in the ancillary recreational facilities that would effectively increase the demand for guest rooms on an annualized basis and substantially increase the average occupancy OOg5O5 rates during the summer months would be beneficial and promote the long-term economic viability of the resort. La Quinta Resort Club Memberships Although the existing tennis and fitness facilities on -site are utilized by hotel guests, they are also available to individuals who are not hotel guests (non -hotel guest users) through an exclusive Club Membership Program affiliated with the La Quinta Resort & Club. The proposed water feature will be predominantly used by hotel guests, but will also be available to club members. Club memberships permit non -hotel guests to access the resort fitness facilities and participate in an array of programs and activities including: golf practice, use of three clubhouses, tennis privileges, and concierge services. Club members are also entitled to preferred pricing on all resort golf courses, at all resort restaurants, on rooms for guests and family, and at the Spa La Quinta. All of the club members have access to the resort facilities. Memberships are available in different classes, with and without golf privileges. There are currently a total of 476 golf memberships, and 386 non -golf memberships. The average age of the current club members exceeds 55 years. All memberships allow the member, the member's spouse and their children under the age of 23 years to share the membership privileges, which will include access to the proposed water feature. There are no plans to change the structure of the existing club membership program or create a new club membership program in the future solely to permit access to the water feature. Although the water feature would provide an additional incentive to become a club member, the cost of club membership includes a minimum of $15,000.00 (to initiate a non -golf club membership) plus a monthly fee of $210.00. Given the cost of club membership, it is unlikely that many club t ) memberships would be sold solely to permit access to the water feature. 1 The existing tennis and fitness facilities are accessible to club members and their guests who are not club members (upon payment of a nominal forty dollar fee). Club members will not be allowed to bring any guests into the water feature who are not club members (unless they are registered guests of the La Quinta Resort Hotel). Destination Resort Hotels Major resort hotels are self-contained multi -use developments providing a variety of supportive ancillary facilities such as conference facilities and meeting/banquet rooms in addition to guest rooms to accommodate business travelers, conventions, and meetings. Destination resort hotels cater to the tourist and vacation industry, often providing a wide variety of recreational facilities and programs (such as golf courses, tennis courts, beach access, swimming pools, fitness rooms, day spas, and other amenities) to improve occupancy rates. Destination resort hotels have special characteristics that distinguish them from traditional hotels. Rather than functioning simply as a convenient place for guests to stay while visiting an area, destination resorts are primary attractions. The accommodations at a given facility, as well as the complete range of on -site amenities that are available, appeal to various segments of the marketplace and attract guests year after year, thereby increasing hotel occupancy. Typical resort hotels provide luxury accommodations with more than 250 guest rooms and in-house restaurants, cocktail lounges, gift and retail shops, and other on -site amenities and guest services such as a fitness centers, health spas, golf courses, tennis courts, beaches, and/or other recreational attractions and programs. Resort hotels often provide various 4 0001 50 (! forms of guest transportation services for trips to and from the nearest airport, golf courses, or other attractions. Because of the trip interactions between the various ancillary facilities, destination resort hotels tend to exhibit lower trip generation rates on weekdays than more traditional hotels, where daily activities require the use of a vehicle for travel to and from the hotel.' The Economics of Water Features at Resorts Destination resort hotels are sensitive to fluctuations in the leisure market, the economy, and the demographic composition of the market area. The overall competitiveness of a hotel is determined by many economic and demographic factors that affect its market share (such as the number of existing competitors and recent hotel openings, the amenity offerings of competitors, and the number of families with children in the area who might visit). Resorts can reduce the adverse effects of seasonality and weather on room bookings by providing indoor/outdoor water features to capture year-round revenues thereby reducing lost business due to bad weather. Hotels with indoor waterparks have demonstrated that they can extend their peak seasons and fill rooms on weekends and during school breaks by providing a venue that is weather-proof. Families have been willing to drive 200 miles to spend a weekend at a resort with an indoor waterpark 2 Potential Short -Term Impacts on Traffic and Parking The proposed project would generate short-term increases in construction -related traffic on area roadways within and surrounding the La Quinta Resort & Club. Construction traffic will utilize Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon to access the project site. Specific details regarding the number and type of construction vehicles required, and the length of the construction period will not be available until contractors are engaged who can provide detailed estimates. The vehicles of the construction crew, and the heavy construction equipment required during demolition and construction activities, are expected to be parked in a construction staging area on the Palm Grove parcel (on the southwest comer of Avenida Oregon and Avenida Fernando). In the event that additional space is needed as a back-up/overflow site for construction vehicles, it will be provided at a different location, to ensure that construction vehicles do not park along Avenida Fernando. Debris (that is generated by the demolition of the existing facilities required to accommodate the proposed improvements) may be removed from the site by truck and deposited in the closest landfill. To minimize the number of off -site truck trips, an effort will be made to balance earthwork quantities on -site and some of the demolition debris may be deposited (with any excess material generated during the excavation process) within the Slide Mountain structure. The building materials and equipment required as well as the requisite landscaping materials to implement the project will be transported to the site in trucks that will utilize Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon for access. Short-term construction -related traffic will be 1. Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., "Resort Hotel Traffic Study", December 29, 1986. 2. Coy, Jeff, "What Are the Risk Factors of a Hotel Waterpark Investment,' Hospitality Net- Industry News, December 15, 2005, (http://wwwhospitalitynet.org/news/4025800.httnl), Viewed October 3, 2006. 000508 ( noticeable to resort guests and nearby residents who utilize Avenida Fernando and Avenida " Obregon for access to/from their homes. Even though the additional truck traffic may be a nuisance, it will only be generated for a short period of time and the roadways to be used by the trucks have been adequately designed and improved to accommodate trucks. A centerline will be added to the road surface on Avenida Obregon and the street will be improved, as shown in Figure 3 or Figure 4. The roadways surrounding the La Quinta Resort, including both Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon, have the available capacity to serve the level of additional traffic anticipated during the construction process. Therefore, construction -related traffic impacts are not expected to be significant. Long -Term Employee Traffic Impacts Employees are currently required to park off -site, at a parking lot along Calle Tampico, and are transported by shuttle to the La Quinta Resort & Club. The shuttles operate on a 24- hour basis. Once the existing recreational facilities are replaced with the proposed water feature, the number of hotel employees will increase slightly. The staffing required for the portion of the resort to be modified with the water features is expected to increase from 16 today to 48 employees in the future. The highest staffing for the water feature is expected to occur during the summer, when the overall staffing of the resort is lower. There is adequate off -site parking available in the remote Calle Tampico employee parking lot to accommodate the increase in employee parking demand that is anticipated with the proposed project. The projected increase in the number of employees is not expected to substantially increase the traffic in or around the hotel grounds or increase the off-street parking demand at the hotel. It may incrementally increase the demand for off-street employee parking spaces at the remote lot adjacent to Calle Tampico. It may also incrementally increase the number of shuttle trips to and from the resort from the remote lot. These increases are not considered significant, since substantially larger seasonal variations in the resort staffing currently go unnoticed by surrounding residents, as the demand for rooms at the resort fluctuates from season to season and from weekdays to weekend days. The water feature may require incrementally more maintenance than the existing recreational facilities on the 7.4-acre site. Maintenance personnel will use golf carts or walk. A maintenance storage area will be constructed to facilitate maintenance of the water feature. A truck will deliver chemicals to condition the water two or three times per week, during off-peak hours in the warmer summer months. The need for chemicals to condition the water should be somewhat lower during the cooler winter months. Traffic Impacts Associated with Increased Guest Room Bookings The proposed water features are unique to the area and have the potential to attract a substantial number of hotel guests from a wider demographic population, particularly in the summer months. This increase in hotel guests will increase traffic volumes and pedestrian volumes in the area during the summer months. The surrounding community experiences lower traffic volumes in the summer months. As a result, the surrounding street system has available unused capacity in the summertime, a portion of which would be utilized by the additional hotel guests. Since access to the water feature will be limited to hotel guests and club members (guests of the hotel guests will not be allowed), the increase in guest room bookings associated with the proposed water feature would not exceed the current capacity of the existing resort hotel 1 _ A 000509 r v? � 0 x EX, ME61AN CURB EX. FH TO BE RELOCATED EX. WEDGE CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVED .EXISTING CURB & GUTTER J EXISTING MEDIAN CURB AVENIDA FERNANDO ~�.. ,..,.. PROP. STRIPIw__ - .- ----------- EXISTING DIRECTIONAL — - - w EX:.`CORB -- 0 EXISTING o PALM GROVE d CURB & GUTTER EXISTING PARKING STALLS - EXISTING WEDGE _ .CURB & GUTTER _. I ,5' 20' 10' 20' 2' EX. R.W�+ 33' EX. R MONUMENT TO BE RELOCATED " r& 'GUTTER _ o EX. -R/W EXISTING WALL S. PROPOSED WALL 5' ENSTING POOL 1 PROTECT IN PLACE j EX. WALL TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED WALL 2.5' PROPOSED WEDGE CURB & GUTTER EX. WEDGE CURB & GLITTER TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED R/W EXISTING PARKING STALLS (9) TO BE RELOCATED TO ALTERNATE LOCATION ON RESORT SITE J FACE OF BUILDING WALL PARKING ATTENDANT + STATION H PROP. STRIPING EXISTING EXISTING WALL RESORT VILLA SCALE: 1" =20' Figure 3 ENTRY EXHIBIT SIGNATURE POOL LA QUINTA RESORT & SPA CITY OF LA QUINTA I:\41312\EXHIBITS\EXH-ENTRY.dwg 1O/O2/06 000310 O IU AVENIDA FERNANDO z EX. MEDIAN `.. CURB EX. PH TO BE RELOCATED EX. WEDGE CURB & GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PALM GROVE PROPOSED WEDGE CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED MEDIAN CURB PROPOSED GATE 10' 0 PROPOSED u FENCE u EXISTING WEDGE P CURB & GUTTER - q EX. VAULTS 0 - EXISTING MEDIAN CURB PROP. STRIPING- MONUMENT TO BE RELOCATED \- EXISTING WALL \ s PROPOSED WALL U � z 5' EXISTING POOL PROTECT IN PLACE It-= 20' EX. R & GUTTER EX., R/W EX. WALL TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED WALL 2.5' PROPOSED WEDGE CURB & GUTTER EX, WEDGE CURB & GUTTER TO BE - REMOVED PROPOSED R/W EXISTING PARKING STALLS (12) TO BE RELOCATED TO ALTERNATE LOCATION ON RESORT SITE FACE OF BUILDING WALL PARKING ATTENDANT STATION / CALL BOX EXISTING EXISTING WILL RESORT VILLA — PROPOSED GATE I PROP. STRIPING ' PROP. PARKING STALL W/ WHEEL STOP SCALE: EXISTING PARKING STALLS Figuree 4 4 ENTRY EXHIBIT SIGNATURE POOL LA QUINTA RESORT & SPA CITY OF LA QUINTA 1.\41312\EXHI8ITS\EXH-ENTRY.dwq 1Q(Q2,/Qk -D I I rooms. Therefore, regardless of the extent to which the water feature increases the demand for rooms at the resort, the resulting hotel traffic during the summer months will not exceed the peak season traffic volumes that are currently being generated by the resort in the peak months of January through April. The existing peak season traffic volumes generated by the resort hotel are accommodated by the existing street system within and surrounding the La Quinta Resort. Thus, the proposed project will allow the hotel to make better use of its existing entitlements without generating new traffic impacts. The demand for access to the water feature during the peak winter months is not expected to be substantial. The average ambient winter temperatures in La Quinta during the daytime are mild, but not warm enough to attract a substantial number of families to the hotel on weekdays in the winter months when schools are in session. On winter weekends, the resort is already operating at full occupancy. Consequently, no increase in the demand for guest room bookings could be accommodated on winter weekends. When children are home from school for the holidays in December, the resort hotel typically experiences a significant drop in occupancy. Therefore, any increase in guest bookings associated with the water feature, while not expected to be substantial, could be accommodated by the unused capacity of the surrounding street system that results from the historical drop in room bookings at the resort that is typical of December. The parking demand associated with resort hotels is complex and subject to substantial day- to-day and seasonal variations, as room occupancy levels and activity levels at the resort vary. The use of restaurants and bar facilities at the resort can include a substantial number of people who are not staying at the hotel. The hourly parking accumulation of the restaurants at the La Quinta Resort tends to peak during the dinner hours (between 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.) with a sustained demand caused by the low turnover of patrons. The water feature will be open in the daytime hours (when the hotel and restaurant parking accumulation is lowest). The water feature will close at 6:00 p.m., to coincide with the time when the parking demand associated with the restaurants and hotel rises. Traffic Impacts Associated with Club Memberships During the peak season, the guest room occupancy and the corresponding number of motor vehicle trips generated by the La Quinta Resort reach the levels associated with the existing entitlements. If the occupancy rate were to remain constant throughout the year, there would be no need for the proposed water feature. Unfortunately, it varies on weekdays compared to weekends and fluctuates from month to month with the seasons. Many resorts with seasonal gaps in their business offer club membership programs to non -hotel guests to generate revenue in the off season to cover the costs associated with keeping the resort open and fully staffed. Those resorts offering the most attractive recreational amenities are often the most successful at selling club memberships. Tennis and exercise facilities, which are readily available in the vicinity of the La Quinta Resort, may not attract as many club members as the major water feature proposed. Fortunately, the most desirable months in which to use the water feature correspond to the season with the lowest traffic volumes and parking demand at the La Quinta Resort & Club. Furthermore, any traffic and parking impacts on Avenida Obregon would primarily affect the La Quinta Resort & Club. That provides an incentive for the resort to manage traffic and parking in a manner that minimizes the potential for impacts associated with the proposed water feature. 000512 { The proposed water feature may attract more club member traffic on an annual basis than the existing tennis amenities on -site. However, usage of the tennis facilities on -site generally peaks in the cooler winter months, whereas the water feature usage will peak in the warmer summer months. Once the novelty of the water feature fades somewhat, the demand for access to the water feature may be largely self-regulating. Since the demand for access to the water feature will be relatively low during the winter months (when the demand for the tennis amenities is high), the peak traffic season club member usage may not increase appreciably. Potential Parking Impacts Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon are private streets that are open to the public. Even when the hotel is operating at moderate occupancy rates, the available parking spaces on Avenida Obregon fill quickly. During periods of peak parking demand, there are few unoccupied on -street parking spaces available along Avenida Obregon. When the resort guest rooms are fully booked during the winter months, the availability of parking on Avenida Obregon for club members visiting the tennis facilities has been a concern. Steps have been taken by the La Quinta Resort to resolve this parking issue and minimize the potential for overflow parking. These steps included: increased patrolling, the use of improved signage, and the creation of no -parking zones. During the most recent peak season, there were only two complaints received by the resort regarding the availability of parking along Avenida Obregon. In both cases, parking was available to the club member on -site, albeit not in close proximity to the tennis facilities. A shuttle service is available for club members when parking is not available in close proximity to the amenity they are visiting. During the peak winter months, the La Quinta Resort Hotel operates near its full occupancy with very few off-street parking spaces unoccupied. As a result, the number of parking spaces available in the peak season which could be used by club members who wish to visit the water feature is limited. Club member traffic to/from the water feature in the winter or early spring, when traffic volumes are typically at their peak in La Quinta, could be limited by the cooler weather and the age of the club members (which averages 55+) and their families. Given the reduced traffic volumes on the streets of La Quinta in the summer months and the reduced traffic demand resulting from lower occupancy rates at the hotel, the potential for significant traffic impacts as a result of the limited number of club members who will utilize the water feature in the summer months should be low. Since the water feature may initially generate more interest than the existing tennis facilities, there is the potential for the proposed project to attract motorists who may pass by or even park along Avenida Obregon briefly to view the new water features. To control parking along Avenida Obregon, a parking management program should be developed which requires parking permits and can be enforced through the ticketing of violators and the towing of vehicles parked without a permit. Permits should be issued to hotel guests and club members at the front desk of the hotel. During the off-season summer months, some of the off-street parking permits on -site may be made available to a limited number of club members with water feature access privileges. If the number of club members visiting the water feature exceeds the number of available parking spaces on Avenida Obregon, club members may not be issued Avenida Obregon parking permits. Instead they may be directed to park in the main front lot (approximately 1,000 feet from the water feature) where a shuttle or golf cart will be made available for access to the water feature. Even with parking controlled on Avenida Obregon, allowing access to the water feature through the club membership program may result in increased traffic volumes on Avenida 000513 Obregon. Appropriate signage should be provided, clearly indicating that parking along Avenida Obregon is by permit only.. Children should be accompanied by adults when accessing the water feature. However (unless they are lodging in close proximity to the water feature) older children may arrange to be dropped off and later picked up by their parents along Avenida Obregon. A designated passenger loading zone should be provided, where children destined to/from the water feature can be safely dropped off and picked up by their families. This zone can also serve as a shuttle drop and loading point. The improvements proposed along Avenida Obregon will include a raised median, south of Avenida Fernando, that can accommodate a parking attendant station/call box and provide a vehicle turn around area. After monitoring the situation, the City of La Quinta may require Avenida Obregon to be gated. If required, gates can be added across Avenida Obregon, south of the turn around area, as shown in Figure 4. While there is no way to accurately predict how much parking will be needed when the water feature is completed, several conclusions can be drawn from the current parking conditions in the vicinity. The restaurants on -site increase the parking accumulation during the evenings. The hotel guests utilize the parking at night. More rooms are booked in the winter and spring than in the summer months. Consequently, the shared parking provided at the resort is more likely to have spaces available during the summer months and during the daytime hours before dinnertime. These are the periods when the water feature is most likely to be utilized. If the parking demand exceeds the available parking supply on -site on peak days in the future, steps should be taken to ensure that club members and hotel guests do not park in the adjacent neighborhood. To reduce the parking accumulation on peak days in the f vicinity of the water feature (along Avenida Obregon), club members may not be issued parking permits. Club members destined for the water feature may be instructed to park in the main lot and use the shuttle to access the water feature. Avenida Obregon may be gated to control access to the available parking. If necessary, additional off-street parking spaces should be made available at a remote location served by golf carts or a shuttle. Summary of Findings 1. The average monthly occupancy rate at the La Quinta Resort is substantially lower during the summer months (Memorial Day through Labor Day) and during the December holiday season. During the summer months, traffic volumes on the streets of La Quinta are also substantially lower than the traffic volumes during the peak season (winter and spring). 2. The provision of a new water feature on -site is being proposed as a means of improving the hotel occupancy, particularly in the summer months, without increasing the existing entitlements of the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan. The proposed changes in the ancillary recreational amenities will allow the La Quinta Resort to make more consistent year-round use of its existing entitlements. 3. The proposed water feature is designed to be a private ancillary recreational amenity for use by guests of the La Quinta Resort that will not be open to the general public. Use of the water feature will be limited primarily to guests staying at the La Quinta Resort Hotel and a select number of individuals who participate in the exclusive Club Membership Program. 4. Club members will not be allowed to bring friends, grandchildren or relatives into the f water feature (other than their spouse and children 23 or younger). 000514 5. The La Quinta Resort will not permit widespread use of the proposed water feature by non -hotel guests through a facilities sharing program with other hotels, as this would reduce the incentive to stay at the La Quinta Resort Hotel. 6. For the most part, the number of occupied guest rooms will determine the number of trips that will be generated by the resort and also establish the demand for off-street hotel parking. The proposed modifications will not alter the number of hotel rooms or the existing off-street parking supply. Recommendations To minimize the potential for the parking accumulation to overflow the available parking supply on -site on peak days in the future, steps should be taken to ensure that club members and hotel guests do not park in the adjacent neighborhood. The following recommendations have been identified to reduce the potential for adverse impacts related to an excessive parking accumulation in the vicinity of the water feature. 1. The construction specifications should include a requirement that construction -related parking shall not be permitted along Avenida Fernando and shall occur only in designated construction staging areas. 2. In the event that additional space is needed as a back-up/overflow construction staging area, it will be provided at a designated location to ensure that construction vehicles do not park along Avenida Fernando. 3. { To control parking along Avenida Obregon, a parking management program should be ) developed which requires parking permits and can be enforced through the ticketing of violators and the towing of vehicles parked without a permit. Permits should be issued to hotel guests and club members at the front desk of the hotel. If the number of club members visiting the water feature exceeds the number of available parking spaces on Avenida Obregon, club members should not be issued Avenida Obregon parking permits. During periods when parking for the water feature is only permitted in the main lot, a shuttle or golf cart transportation shall be made available and hotel guests and club members shall be informed of its availability. 4. Appropriate signage should be provided, clearly indicating that parking along Avenida Obregon is by permit only. 5. A designated passenger loading zone should be provided along Avenida Obregon, near the the water feature entry, where children destined to/from the water feature can be safely dropped off and picked up by their families. This zone can also serve as a shuttle drop and loading point. 6. Since the main parking lot for the hotel is located approximately 1,000 feet from the proposed water feature, signage should be provided to clearly identify the path to be used between the main parking lot and the water feature. 7. If the parking demand exceeds the available parking supply on -site on peak days in the future, steps should be taken to ensure that people do not park in the adjacent neighborhood. If required, additional off-street parking should be provided at a remote location which is accessible by shuttle and golf carts. 10 oOO515 8. If the City of La Quinta, after monitoring the situation, requires Avenida Obregon to be gated, gates should be installed across Avenida Obregon (south of Avenida Fernando) and the proposed turn around area. Conclusions 1. The proposed water feature is not expected to substantially increase the La Quinta Resort trip generation during the peak winter or early spring months, when traffic volumes on City streets typically are at their peak levels. 2. Once the novelty of the water feature fades, the demand for access to the water feature may be largely self-regulating. Since the demand for access to the water feature will be relatively small during the winter months (when the demand for the tennis and other amenities is high) the water feature may not increase peak season club member usage appreciably, even without restrictions on club member access to the water feature. 3. The La Quinta Resort Hotel has a peak parking demand during dinnertime (6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.) and overnight (from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.). Generally, the number of occupied guest rooms determines the number of trips generated by the resort and the magnitude of the demand for off-street hotel parking. The proposed modifications to ancillary recreational amenities will not alter any of the hotel rooms or the existing off- street parking supply. The water feature will have peak activity levels in the middle of the day, when the parking accumulation associated with the La Quinta Hotel and restaurants is low. The water feature will close by 6:00 p.m., when the parking demand and accumulation associated with the restaurants and hotel rooms increases. We trust that this information adequately addresses concerns regarding the potential traffic and parking implications of the proposed modifications at the La Quinta Resort & Club to replace the tennis/pool facilities with a new water feature. Should questions or comments arise regarding the findings and recommendations herein, please do not hesitate to contact our offices. We look forward to discussing our findings and conclusions with you. Cordially, ENDOENGINEERING ((--�v0VISS10 4 1.E£ Grego E h x Principal TR 1161 Vicki Lee Endo, P.E. 1A 131 JRooB Registered Professional Traffic Engineer TR 1161 Jjq, TPRft1��Q�a�Q 00,0516 Mr. Gregory Endo received his Bachelors and Masters degrees and has completed three years of research in pursuit of a Doctorate degree in Physics at the University of California, Irvine. Mr. Endo has also been involved in computer modeling applications as they relate to environmental engineering for more than 20 years. Mr. Endo has adapted existing programs and developed new ones for use by environmental, planning, and traffic engineering consultants to model transportation, air quality, and acoustic systems. During the past fifteen years, Mr. Endo has expanded the transportation planning capabilities of Endo Engineering by integrating the use of computer modeling in the planning process. He was responsible for the circulation modeling of the Cathedral City General Plan, Desert Hot Springs General Plan, Coachella General Plan, and numerous specific plans, in the Coachella Valley using the Coachella Valley Area Transportation System (CVATS) Model'. His primary responsibilities include maintaining liaison with clients and local agencies, project management for multi -disciplinary projects, and special studies integrating opportunities and constraints with development feasibility and alternative analyses. Education Advancement to Doctoral Candidacy in Physics, University of California, Irvine, 1979 Master of Arts in Physics, University of California, Irvine, 1979 Bachelor of Arts in Physics, University of California, Irvine, 1976 Relevant Work Experience Endo Engineering - Principal, Computer Modeling Applications Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers - Traffic Programming Consultant Phillips, Brandt, Reddick, Inc. - Air Quality and Noise Programming Consultant to Environmental Systems Research Group { 1 University of California, Irvine; School of Engineering - Computer Consultant of Air Pollution Exercise (APEX) Special Skills Computer modeling for transportation planning and traffic engineering applications. Computerized modeling of noise impacts and the design of appropriate barriers as mitigation using techniques developed by the FHWA and Caltrans. Computer modeling of air quality using the California Line Source Dispersion Model developed by Caltrans. Professional Societies Sigma Pi Sigma - Physics Society Southwestern Region TRANPLAN Model Users Group Publications "Generation of a Closed, Field -Reversed Magnetic Configuration by an Electron Beam Launched from a Magnetized Cathode," Bulletin of the American Physical Society, October 1979, with Scott Robertson. "Cross -Field Injection of an Intense Ion Beam into a Toroidal Magnetic Field," Bulletin of the American Physical Society, October 1979, with Scott Robertson and Frank Wessel. 00051'7 { "An Intense Pulsed Magnetically Insulated Deuteron Source," Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 35, No. 11, December 1979, with Scott Robertson. "Spheromak Configuration Generated by Rotating Relativistic Electron Beam," Bulletin of the American Physical Society, October 1980, with Scott Robertson. "Experimental Study of a High Current Betatron," Bulletin of the American Physical Society, September 1981, with A. Fisher, H. Ishizuka, J. Schneider, G/ Barak, N. Rostoker. "Mechanics," Physics Laboratory Manual, Oct. 1982, with Dr. F. Potter. "Circuits," Physics Laboratory Manual, Jan. 1983, with Dr. F. Potter. "Oscillations," Physics Laboratory Manual, Mar. 1983, with Dr. F. Potter. "Optics," Physics Laboratory Manual, June 1983, with Dr. F. Potter. ( J Mrs. Vicki Lee Endo graduated from the University of California at Irvine School of Engineering in 1975. She has been a registered Professional Traffic Engineer in the State of California for 25 years and is a member of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Mrs. Endo has served as a project manager and principal investigator on more than 1,000 air quality impact assessments, noise impact studies and traffic studies for projects throughout California. Her analytical specialties include technical research, the analysis of transportation, acoustic, and air resource systems, and the preparation of technical studies, environmental impact reports, environmental assessments, development feasibility studies, opportunities and constraints' studies, and other planning documentation. Mrs. Endo founded Endo Engineering in 1982 to satisfy the growing demand for technical analyses in the three inter -related disciplines of traffic, air quality and noise with state-of- the-art computer capabilities. Education Registered Professional Traffic Engineer TR 1161, 1982 Engineer -In -Training Certificate 51225, 1981 Certification in Transportation Systems Management, University of California, Irvine, 1977 Bachelor of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 1975 Relevant Work Experience Endo Engineering - Principal, Professional Engineer Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Inc., Engineers -Transportation Engineer II William Kunzman and Associates - Associate Traffic Engineer Phillips, Brandt, Reddick, Inc. - Environmental Engineer, Senior Project Manager in Environmental Systems Research Group University of California, Irvine; School of Engineering - Engineering Aide, Air Pollution Research Special Skills The modeling and assessment of acoustic, air quality, and circulation impacts. The design of appropriate mitigation measures. The management and preparation of proposals, planning documents, technical reports, and environmental impact reports. Professional Societies Institute of Transportation Engineers - Member Publications "Left Turn Pocket Length Requirements", Institute of Transportation Engineers Technical Notes, 1980 with William Kunzman. 0-001519 APPENDIX C Air Quality Modeling and Analysis (2006) ()'o0J'9D I } ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AIR QUALITY Analysis of Proposed Water Feature Project The proposed project would develop a major water feature on the existing ancillary recreational facilities on 7.4 acres at the La Quinta Resort & Club in the City of La Quinta. The water feature will include proposed improvements that consists of an arrival plaza and waterfall fountain at an entry building, a new formal signature swimming pool and whirlpool with ten adjacent cabanas, a 30-foot tall "Slide Mountain" water slide, a wave pool with a video projection screen, a splash -down pool, a lazy river (which passes through a canyon, a cave, and under a stone veneer bridge), and a toddler pool with a nearby pop jet fountain and play structure for youngsters. A small enclosed game (arcade) room would be provided as well as a lounge terrace, a loggia, wood decks, paths, extensive landscaping, decorative plantings, and new lighting fixtures. Although the existing resort facilities do not include a maintenance storage area, one will be provided with the proposed project. The entire area will be enclosed within a gated pool enclosure fence that will allow fire lane access. The proposed project includes demolition of nine of the existing tennis courts and the existing tennis ' stadium and center court. A restroom building and the outdoor swimming pool will also be demolished. The modifications will not alter any of the hotel rooms or change the existing off-street parking supply. The existing bar/restaurant, tennis/fitness clubhouse, and the Morgan House will remain on -site. Construction and operational area and mobile source emissions for the proposed project were calculated using URBEMIS 2002, version 8.7.0, which is a land use and transportation based air quality model developed in cooperation with the California Air Resources Board (ARB) and air quality management districts and air pollution control districts throughout the state. Construction emissions were estimated using South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)-approved emission factors and assumptions that are already built into the model, including fugitive dust control measures required under the district's Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). This analysis predicts the construction- and operation -related emissions due to the development of the water feature and compares the results to the established SCAQMD significance thresholds. URBEMIS 2002 was used to estimate the construction- and operation -related emissions for criteria pollutants as directed by SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Information provided by the applicant and conservative assumptions set forth herein were used to set up the model. Where information was not Environmental Analysis available, the model default values were used. A summary of the model inputs are shown below. Details are included in the URBEMIS 2002 output found at the end of this discussion. URBEMIS 2002 Model Inputs • Anticipated demolition schedule (start month/year and duration): February 2008, 0.5 months; • Anticipated grading and excavation schedule: February 2008, 0.75 months; • Total number of acres of land to be graded: 7.4 acres; • Maximum acres graded per day: 1.85 acres; • Amount of soil to be exported: 4,993 cubic yards; • Number of days to conduct soil hauling and grading: 16.5 days; • Dust control measures: As required by SCAQMD Rule 403; and • Anticipated construction schedule (including demolition and grading, start and end month and year): February 2008 to March 2008. Trip generation rates were obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Endo Engineeringl and the Resort Hotel Traffic Study prepared by Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.2 The latter document estimated the range of trip generation rates for representative resort hotels located in Southern California and South { i Carolina between 5.0 and 6.4. The former document concluded that the proposed water feature will not substantially impact trip generation rates during the peak winter period. The document also concluded that "the resulting hotel traffic during the summer months will not exceed the peak season traffic volumes that are currently being generated by the resort in the peak months of January through April" since access to the water feature will be limited to hotel guests and resort club members. As a result, a conservative trip generation rate of 6.4 was used for the proposed project. Emissions from asphalt paving were not used in the URBEMIS 2002 input since there is no planned asphalt paving within the proposed project and there will be no changes to the existing off-street parking supply. Architectural coatings were also not used in the analysis since there are no proposed buildings or major structures that would require architectural coatings onsite. 1 Endo Engineering, La Quinta Resort and Club EA 2006-573 and Site Deuelopment Permit 2006-865 Traffic Impact Analysis, November 15, 2006. 2 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., Resort Hotel Traffic Study, December 29, 1986. Environmental Analysis Construction Emissions Table 1, Estimated Maximum Construction Equipment In Use Per Day, lists the maximum number and types of equipment that are expected to be used in any single day, per construction phase, during completion of the proposed project. The table is not a complete list of all equipment that is expected to be used during the course of the proposed project - rather it is a list of the maximum number and types of equipment that will be in used in any single day. This was done in order to properly estimate the maximum daily emissions from construction -related activity due to the proposed project. Table 1 Estimated Maximum Construction Equipment In Use Per Day :Pha;elEgpiprtment -- TyfaxiinumNbriiber &t'TJse'Per D�y� Phase 1, Demolition Off Highway Truck (Water Truck) 1 Rubber Tired Loader 1 Tractor/t;ackhoe 1 Haul Trucks 17 (round trips per day) Phase 2, Grading & Excavation fy Crawler Tractor 1 1 Grader 1 Off Highway Truck (Water Truck) 1 Scraper 1 Large TractorBackhoe 1 Haul Trucks 7 (round trips per day) Phase 3, Fence Construction TractorBackhoe 1 Source: Impact Sciences, Inc. All equipment was assumed to operate for eight hours per day with the exception of the water trucks, which were assumed to operate for four hours per day. This is a reasonably conservative estimate since the SCAQMD recommends watering of disturbed unpaved surfaces three times daily. Table 2, Estimated Unmitigated Construction Emissions, compares the maximum daily emissions in this analysis with the SCAQMD significance thresholds. The maximum daily emissions for each pollutant listed below are considered not significant if they are less than the SCAQMD thresholds. 00�3'. Environmental Analysis I Table 2 Estimated Unmitigated Construction Emissions Phase 1 E'missioris =' ltiTatctncum Emissions iw ound& per Day? v NOz EQ' 50i.° PMIu Construction Emissions 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 15.21 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO Source: Impact Sciences, Inc. i Assumes conformance with Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). This analysis calculates that the maximum daily unmitigated construction emissions due to the proposed project are not predicted to exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for any pollutant listed in Table 2. Based on the information above, the proposed project is considered not significant for construction -related emissions. Operational Emissions Table 3, Estimated Unmitigated Operational Emissions, compares the maximum daily emissions in this analysis with the SCAQMD significance thresholds. The maximum daily emissions for each pollutant listed below are considered not significant if they are less than the SCAQMD thresholds. Table 3 Estimated Unmitigated Operation Emissions Phase 1Emissions Maxrinum l missions in Pounds'g'e'r D3yz.: Vf)C'- I40x. CO: _-S„Oz.; PMo;,,, Operation Emissions 21.35 20.80 137AO 0.07 10.82 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO Source: Impact Sciences, Inc. Assumes conformance with Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). This analysis calculates that the maximum daily unmitigated operational emissions due to the proposed project are not predicted to exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for any pollutant listed in Table 2. Based on the information above, the proposed project is considered not significant for operation -related emissions. ioiD�0 524 Environmmtal Analysis �- Based on the predicted results of this analysis, the proposed major water feature would not result in any significant construction- or operation, -related emissions; therefore the project is considered not significant. Management Plans and Project Features The following management plans and project features are applicable to the proposed project. Use of these plans and features will help to reduce emissions further below the significance thresholds. Construction -related impacts La Quints Resort shall include the following SCAQMD-recommended measures in its construction contract conditions: Develop and implement a construction management plan, as approved by the City of La Quinta prior to issuance of a grading permit, which includes the following measures recommended by the SCAQMD, or equivalently effective measures approved by the SCAQMD: a. Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. b. Provide temporary traffic controls, as needed, during all phases of construction activities to maintain traffic flow (e.g., flag person). c. Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off-peak hours to the degree practicable. d. Re-route construction trucks away from congested streets. e. Consolidate truck deliveries when possible. f. Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on and off site. g. Maintain equipment and vehicle engines in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturers' specifications and per SCAQMD rules, to minimize exhaust emissions. h. Suspend use of all construction equipment operations during second stage smog alerts. Contact the SCAQMD at 800/242-4022 for daily forecasts. i. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel- or gasoline -powered generators. j. Use methanol- or natural gas -powered mobile equipment and pile drivers instead of diesel if readily available at competitive prices. k. Use propane- or butane -powered on -site mobile equipment instead of gasoline if readily available at competitive prices. go;o `25 Environmental Analysis L - Develop and implement a dust control plan, as approved by the City of fa Quinta prior to issuance of a grading permit, which includes the measures recommended by the SCAQMD, or equivalently effective measures approved by the SCAQMD, as provided in Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust from construction activities. Operation -related impacts To the extent La Quinta Resort has not previously implemented the following operational control features, as soon as reasonably feasible, La Quinta Resort, or its designee, will: a. Use lighting controls and energy efficient lighting; b. Require recycling bins in addition to trash bins and contract for recycling services; c. Use light colored roof materials to reflect heat; d. Use building materials that do not require use of paints and solvents. Use of these management plans and features would help to maintain air quality that is below SCAQMD- established standards for determining adverse air quality due to a proposed project. 00�31- ► Page: 1 12/0'1/2006 8:42 PM } URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 File Name: M:\Camarillo\9. Air Quality\URBEMIS Files\La Quinta Resort Addendum\Water Feature Amenity.urb Project Name: 0223.011 La Quinta Resort Addendum Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On -Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EKFAC2002 version 2.2 SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 PM10 PM10 ... 2007 '•• ROG NOX CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 9.47 66.79 77.85 0.01 42.06 2.54 39.52 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 15.21 2.54 12.67 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOX CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lba/day, unmitigated) 4.87 3.12 3.40 0.00 0.01 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOX CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 16.48 12.39 130.29 0.07 10.81 SUM OF AREA AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOX CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 21.35 15.51 133.69 0.07 10.82 Page: 2 12/07/2006 8:42 PM { f URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 File Name: M:\Camarillo\9. Air Quality\URBEMIS Files\La Quinta Resort Addendum\Water Feature Amenity.urb Project Name: 0223.011 La Quinta Resort Addendum Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On -Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 PM10 PM10 ••• 2007 ••• ROG NOX CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (lbe/day,unmitigated) 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 42.06 2.54 39.52 TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 15.21 2.54 12.67 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 4.74 3.12 2.62 0.00 0.01 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 13.13 17.69 134.78 0.06 20.81 SUM OF AREA AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day, unmitigated) 17.87 20.80 137.40 0.06 10.82 10 � Page: 3 12/07/2006 8:43 PM URBEMIS 2002 For Windowa 8.7.0 File Name. M:\Camarillo\9. Air Quality\URBEMIS Files\La Quints Resort Addend=\Water Feature Amenity.urb Project Name: 0223.011 La Quinta Resort Addendum Project Location: Soutb Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On -Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 SUMMARY REPORT (Tone/Year) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 PM10 PM10 ••• 2007 ••• ROG NOx CO $02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (tpy, unmitigated) 0.09 0.70 0.85 0.00 0.36 0.02 0.34 TOTALS (tpy, mitigated) 0.09 0.70 0.85 0.00 0.14 0.02 0.12 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOX CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (tpy, unmitigated) 0.65 0.57 0.55 0.00 0.00 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 TOTALS (tpy, unmitigated) 2.80 2.58 24.05 0.01 1.97 SUM OF AREA AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 TOTALS (tpy, unmitigated) 3.45 3.15 24.60 0.01 1,97 00052w9 Page: 4 12/07/2006 8:43 PM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 1 File Name: M:\Camarillo\9. Air Quality\URBEMIS Files\La Quints. Resort Addendum\Water Feature Amenity.urb i---- Project Name: 0223.011 La Quinta Resort Addendum Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On -Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) Construction Start Month and Year: February, 2007 Construction Duration: 1.5 Total Land Use Area to be Developed: 7.4 acres Maximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day; 1.85 acres Single Family Units: 0 Multi -Family Units: 0 Retail/Office/Institutional/Industrial Square Footage: 322340 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES UNMITIGATED (lbs/day) PM10 PMIO PM10 Source ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST ... 2007••• Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 1.54 - 1.S4 Off -Road Diesel 3.80 24.01 31.58 - 0.89 0.89 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.06 1.34 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.01 Worker Trips 0.04 0.11 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.90 25.46 32.91 0.00 2.47 0.92 1.55 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 39.48 - 39.48 Off -Road Diesel 9.05 58.69 74.86 - 2.39 2.39 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.36 7.92 1.34 0.01 0.18 0.15 0.03 Worker Trips 0.06 0.17 1.65 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Maximum lbs/day 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 42.06 2.54 39.52 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off -Road Diesel 0.39 3.00 2.91 - 0.23 0.13 0.00 Jldg Const Worker Trips 0.61 0.35 7.41 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.11 .rch Coatings Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Asphalt Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 1.00 3.35 10.32 0.00 0.25 0.14 0.11 Max lbs/day all phases 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 42.06 2.54 39.52 Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1: Feb '07 Phase 1 Duration: 0.5 months Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 36771.8976 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 3677.2096 On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 51 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0,490 4.0 1 Rubber Tired Loaders 165 0.465 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 8.0 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Feb '07 Phase 2 Duration: 0.75 months On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 302 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Crawler Tractors 143 0.575 8.0 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Scrapers 313 0.660 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions .art Month/Year for Phase 3: Mar -07 horse 3 Duration: 0.25 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: Mar '07 SubPhase Building Duration: 0.25 months 000J3°0 Page: 5 12/07/2006 8:44 PM Off -Road Equipment j No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF SubPhase Asphalt Turned OFF CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES MITIGATED (lbs/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROO NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST ... 2007-•• Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 1.54 - 1.54 Off -Road Diesel 3.80 24.01 31.58 - 0.89 0.89 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.06 1.34 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.01 Worker Trips 0.04 0.11 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.90 25.46 32.91 0.00 2.47 0.92 1.55 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 12.63 - 12.63 Off -Road Diesel 9.05 58.69 74.86 - 2.39 2.39 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.36 7.92 1.34 0.01 0.18 0.15 0.03 Worker Trips 0.06 0.17 1.65 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Maximum lbs/day 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 15.21 2.54 12.67 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off -Road Diesel 0.39 3.00 2.91 - 0.13 0.13 0.00 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.61 0.35 7.41 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.11 Arch Coatings Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - Asphalt Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 1.00 3.35 10.32 0.00 0.25 0.14 0.11 Max lbs/day all phases 9.47 66.78 77.85 0-01 15.21 2-54 12.67 Construction -Related Mitigation Measures Phase 2: Soil Disturbance: Watering three times per day Percent Reduction(ROG 0.0% NOx O.Ot CO 0.0% S02 O.Ot PM10 68t) Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1: Feb '07 Phase i Duration: 0.5 months Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 36771.8976 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 3677.2096 On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 51 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Rubber Tired Loaders 165 0.465 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 6.0 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Feb 107 Phase 2 Duration: 0.75 months On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 302 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Crawler Tractors 143 0.575 8.0 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Off Highway -Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Scrapers 313 0-660 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 Phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3: Mar -07 Phase 3 Duration: 0.25 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: Mar 107 SubPhase Building Duration: 0.25 months / Off -Road Equipment 4 *o. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF SubPhase Asphalt Turned OFF Page: 6 12/07/2006 8:45 PM jUtEA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Winter Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) - Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Natural Gas 0.23 3.12 2.62 0 0.01 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping - No winter emissions Consumer Prdcts 0.00 - - - - Architectural Coatings 4.52 - - _ - TOTALS(lbs/day, unmitigated) 4.74 3.12 2.62 0.00 0.01 000,332 Paget: 7 12/07/2006 8:45 PM UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO SO2 Water Feature Amenity 13.13 17.69 134.78 0.06 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 13.13 17.69 134.78 0.06 Includes correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Amlysia Year: 2007 Temperature (F): 50 Season: Winter EMFAC Version: EMFAC2002 (9/2002) Summary of Land Uses: PM10 10.81 10.81 No. Total Unit Type Acreage Trip Rate Units Trips Water Feature Amenity 6.40 trips/1000 sq. ft. 322.34 2,062.98 Sum of Total Trips 2,062.98 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 7,116.73 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non -Catalyst Catalyst Diesel Light Auto 55.20 1.80 97.80 0.40 Light Truck � 3,750 lbs 15.10 3.30 94.00 2.70 ,Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 16.10 1.90 96.90 1.20 /. ( )ed Truck 5,751- 8,500 7.20 1.40 95.80 2.80 1te-Heavy 8,501-10,000 1.10 0.00 81.80 18.20 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 0.40 0.00 50.00 50.00 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 1.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 Heavy -Heavy 33,001-60,000 0.90 0.00 11.10 88.90 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Urban Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motorcycle 1.70 82.40 17.60 0.00 School Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motor Home 1.20 8.30 83.30 8.40 Travel Conditions Residential Commercial Home- Home- Home - Work Shop Other Commute Non -Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.5 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40:0 i of Trips - Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 t of Trips - Commercial (by land use) Water Feature Amenity 5.0 2.5 92.5 000533 Page: e 12/07/2006 8:46 PM Changes made to the default values for Land Use Trip Percentages Changes made to the default values for Construction The user has overridden the Default Phase Lengths Demolition Truck Hauling Miles/Round Trip changed from 30 to 7.5• Site Grading Fugitive Dust Option changed from Level 1 to Level 2 Phase 2 mitigation measure Soil Disturbance: Watering three times per day has been changed from off to on. Changes made to the default values for Area The hearth option switch changed from on to off. The wood stove percentage changed from 35 to 0. The wood fireplace percentage changed from 10 to 0. The natural gas fireplace percentage changed from 55 to o. The no hearth options percentage changed from 0 to 100. Changes made to the default values for Operations The pass by trips option switch changed from off to on. The operational emission year changed from 2005 to 2007. URBEMIS2002 contains a calculation error that results in four times the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) than should be reported for demolition haul trucks. Accordingly, the default trip length was reduced by a factor of four (from 30 to 7.5 miles) to correct this VMT error. 000a34 Page: 9 12/07/2006 8:46 PM UR13EMIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 t file Name: M:\Camarillo\9. Air Quality\URBEMIS Files\La Ouinta Resort Addendum\Water .-Feature Amenity.urb Project Name: 0223.011 La Quints, Resort Addendum Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On -Road Motor vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) Construction Start Month and Year: February, 2007 Construction Duration: 1.5 Total Land Use Area to be Developed: 7.4 acres . Maximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day: 1.85 acres Single Family Units: 0 Multi -Family Units: 0 Retail/Office/Institutional/Industrial Square Footage: 322340 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES UNMITIGATED (lbs/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST '*• 2007••• Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 1.54 - 1.54 Off -Road Diesel 3.80 24.01 31.58 - 0.89 0.89 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.06 1.34 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.01 Worker Trips 0.04 0.11 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.90 25.46 32.91 0.00 2.47 0.92 1.55 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 39.48 - 39.48 Off -Road Diesel 9.05 58.69 74.86 - 2.39 2.39 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.36 7.92 1.34 0.01 0.18 0.15 0.03 Worker Trips 0.06 0.17 1.65 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Maximum lbs/day 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 42.06 2.54 39.52 ._Phase 3 - Building Construction \ldg Const Off -Road Diesel 0.39 3.00 2.91 - 0.13 0.13 0.00 dg Const Worker Trips 0.61 0.35 7.41 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.11 Arch Coatings Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Asphalt Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 1.00 3.35 10.32 0.00 0.25 0.14 0.11 Max lbs/day all phases 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 42.06 2.54 39.52 Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1: Feb '07 Phase 1 Duration: 0.5 months Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 36771.8976 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 3677.2096 On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 51 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Rubber Tired Loaders 165 0.465 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 8.0 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Feb '07 Phase 2 Duration: 0.75 months On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 302 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Crawler Tractors 143 0.575 8.0 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Scrapers 313 0.660 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 )ase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions -,cart Month/Year for Phase 3: Mar '07 Phase 3 Duration: 0.25 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: Mar '07 SubPhase Building Duration: 0.25 months d `0 3 3.1 Page: 10 12/07/2006 8:46 PM Off -Road Equipment 1 No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Tractor/Loaders/eackhoes 48 0.465 8.0 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF SubPhase Asphalt Turned OFF CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES MITIGATED (lbs/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST ••• 2007••• Phase_ 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 1.54 - 1.54 Off -Road Diesel 3.80 24.01 31.58 - 0.89 0.89 0-00 On -Road Diesel 0.06 1.34 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.01 Worker Trips 0.04 0.11 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.90 25.46 32.91 0.00 2.47 0.92 1.55 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 12.63 - 12.63 Off -Road Diesel 9.05 58.69 74.86 - 2.39 2.39 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.36 7.92 1.34 0.01 0.18 0.15 0.03 Worker Trips 0.06 0.17 1.65 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Maximum lbs/day 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 15.21 2.54 12.67 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off -Road Diesel 0.39 3.00 2.91 - 0.23 0.13 0.00 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.61 0.35 7.41 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.11 Arch Coatings Off -Gas 0.00 - - _ - - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off -Gas 0.00 - - _ _ - - Asphalt Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 1.00 3.35 10.32 0.00 0.25 0.14 0.11 -- Max lbs/day all phases 9.47 66.78 77.85 0.01 15.21 2.54 12.67 Construction -Related Mitigation Measures Phase 2: Soil Disturbance: Watering three times per day Percent Reduction(ROG O.Ot NOx O.Ot CO 0.01 S02 0.0% PM10 68t) Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1: Feb 107 Phase 1 Duration: 0.5 months Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 36771.8976 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 3677.2036 On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 51 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Rubber Tired Loaders 165 0.465 8.0 .l Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 8.0 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Feb '07 Phase 2 Duration: 0.75 months On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 302 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day ] Crawler Tractors 143 0.575 8.0 7 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 3 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 3 Scrapers 313 0.660 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 Phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3: Mar '07 Phase 3 Duration: 0.25 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: War 107 SubPhase Building Duration: 0.25 months Off -Road Equipment Y0. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF SubPhase Asphalt Turned OFF 000000 Page: 11 12/07/2006 8:47 PM .REA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Summer Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) - Source ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 Natural Gas 0.23 3.12 2.62 0 0.01 Hearth - No summer emissions Landscaping 0.12 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 Consumer Prdcts 0.00 - - - - Architectural Coatings 4.52 - - - - TOTALS(lbs/day, unmitigated) 4.87 3.12 3.40 0.00 0.01 00053 Page: 12 12/07/2006 8:47 PM UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO SO2 Water Feature Amenity 16.48 12.39 130.29 0.07 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 16.4E 12.39 130.29 0.07 Includes correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2007 Temperature (F): 90 Season: Summer EMFAC Version: EMFAC2002 (9/2002) Summary of Land Uses: PM10 10.81 10.81 No. Total Unit Type Acreage Trip Rate Units Trips Water Feature Amenity 6.40 trips/1000 sq. ft. 322.34 2,062.98 Sum of Total Trips 2,062.98 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 7,116.73 Vehicle Assumptions Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Light Auto Light Truck < 3,750 lbs Tight Truck 3,751- 5,750 �d Truck 5,751- 8,500 bite -Heavy 8,501-10,000 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 Heavy -Heavy 33,001-60,000 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs Urban Bus Motorcycle School Bus Motor Home Travel Conditions Percent Type Non -Catalyst Catalyst Diesel 55.20 1.80 97.80 0.40 15.10 3.30 94.00 2.70 16.10 1.90 96.90 1.20 7.10 1.40 95.80 2.80 1.10 0.00 81.80 18.20 0.40 0.00 50.00 50.00 1.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.90 0.00 11.10 88.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 1.70 82.40 17.60 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 1.20 8.30 83.30 8.40 Residential Home- Home- Home - Work Shop Other Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 40.0 40.0 % of Trips - Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 t of Trips - Commercial (by land use) Water Feature Amenity Commercial Commute Non -Work Customer 10.3 5.5 5.5 10.3 5.5 5.5 40.0 40.0 40.0 5.0 2.5 92.5 io0 0 11*118 Page; 13 12/07/2006 8:48 PM i� Changes made to the default values for Land Use Trip Percentages Changes made to the default values for Construction The user has overridden the Default Phase Lengths Demolition Truck Hauling Miles/Round Trip changed from 30 to 7.5- Site Grading Fugitive Dust Option changed from Level 1 to Level 2 Phase 2 mitigation measure Soil Disturbance: Watering three times per day has been changed from off to on. Changes made to the default values for Area The hearth option switch changed from on to off. The wood stove percentage changed from 35 to 0. The wood fireplace percentage changed from 10 to 0. The natural gas fireplace percentage changed from 55 to D. The no hearth options percentage changed from 0 to 100. Changes made to the default values for Operations The pass by trips option switch changed from off to on. The operational emission year changed from 2005 to 2007. - URBEMIS2002 contains a calculation error that results in four times the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) than should he reported for demolition haul trucks. Accordingly, the default trip length was reduced by a factor of four (from 30 to 7.5 miles) to correct this VMT error. 000539 Page: 14 12/07/2006 8:48 PM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 ;File Name: M:\Camari110\9. Air Quality\URBEMIS Files\La Quinta Resort Addendum\Water Feature Amenity.urb Project Name: 0223.011 La Quinta Resort Addendum Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On -Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 DETAIL REPORT (Tons/Year) Construction Start Month and Year: February, 2007 Construction Duration: 1.5 Total Land Use Area to be Developed: 7.4 acres Maximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day: 1.85 acres Single Family Units: 0 Multi -Family Units: 0 Retail/Office/Institutional/Industrial Square Footage: 322340 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES UNMITIGATED (tons/year) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST et• 2007-r- Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.01 - 0.01 Off -Road Diesel 0.02 0.13 0.17 - 0.00, 0.00 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons/year 0.02 0.14 0.18 0.00 0,02 0.00 0.01 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.33 - 0.33 Off -Road Diesel 0.07 0.48 0.62 - 0.02 0.02 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons/year 0.07 0.55 0.64 0.00 0.35 0.02 0.33 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 0.00 0.00 D.00 ildg Const Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 erch Coatings Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - _ _ Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - _ Asphalt Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons/year 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total all phases tons/yr 0.09 0.70 0.85 0.00 0.36 0.02 0.34 Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1: Feb 107 Phase 1 Duration: 0.5 months Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 36771.8976 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 3677,2096 On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 51 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Rubber Tired Loaders 165 0.465 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes, 79 0.465 8.0 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Feb '07 Phase 2 Duration: 0.75 months -On-Road Truck Travel (VMT): 302 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Crawler Tractors 143 0.575 8.0 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Scrapers 313 0.660 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8-0 ! -hase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions i :art Month/Year for Phase 3: Mar -07 Chase 3 Duration: 0.25 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: Mar '07 SubPhase Building Duration: 0.25 months (i go 4" Page: 15 12/07/2006 8:49 PM Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day _{ 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 - SubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF SubPhase Asphalt Turned OFF CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES MITIGATED (tons/year) PM10 PM10 PMIO Source ROG NOX CO SO2 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST 2007'+' Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.01 - 0.01 Off -Road Diesel 0.02 0.13 0.17 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons/year 0.02 0.14 0.18 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.11 - 0.11 Off -Road Diesel 0.07 0.48 0.62 - 0.02 0.02 0.00 On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Cons/year 0.07 0.55 0.64 '0.00 0.13 0.02 0.11 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bldg Conat Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arch Coatings Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off -Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Asphalt Off -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On -Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total tons/year 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total all phases tons/yr 0.09 0.70 0.85 0.00 0.14 0.02 0.12 / onstruction-Related Mitigation Measures l Phase 2: Soil Disturbance: Watering three times per day Percent Reduction(ROG 0.0% NOx 0.0% CO 0.0% SO2 O.Ot PM10 68t) Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 1: Feb -07 Phase 1 Duration: 0.5 months Building Volume Total (cubic feet): 36771.8976 Building Volume Daily (cubic feet): 3677.2096 On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 51 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Rubber Tired Loaders 165 0.465 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 8.0 Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Feb -07 Phase 2 Duration: 0.75 months On -Road Truck Travel (VMT): 302 Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Crawler Tractors 143 0.575 8.0 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Off Highway Trucks 417 0.490 4.0 1 Scrapers 313 0.660 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 Phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3: Mar •07 Phase 3 Duration: 0.25 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: Mar '07 SubPhase Building Duration: 0.25 months Off -Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 48 0.465 8.0 5ubPhase Architectural Coatings Turned OFF _.'SubPhase Asphalt Turned OFF 000541 page: 16 12/07/2006 8:50 PM AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Tons per Year, Unmitigated) - - Source ROG NOX CO 502 PM10 Natural Gas 0.04 0.57 0.48 0.00 0.00 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Consumer Prdcts 0.00 - - _ - Architectural Coatings 0.60 - - - - TOTALS (tpy, unmitigated) 0.65 0.57 0.55 0.00 0.00 000-04?. Page: 17 12/07/2006 8:50 PM t 1 ' UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 Water Feature Amenity 2.80 2.58 24.05 0.01 1.97 TOTAL EMISSIONS (tons/yr) 2.80 2.58 24.05 0.01 1.97 Includes correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year, 2007 Season: Annual EMFAC Version: EMFAC2002 (9/2002) Summary of Land Uses: No. Total Unit Type Acreage Trip Rate Units Trips Water Feature Amenity 6.40 trips/1000 sq. ft. 322.34 2,062.98 ' Sum of Total Trips 2,062.98 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 7,116.73 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet. Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non -Catalyst Catalyst Diesel Light Auto 55.20 1,80 97.80 0.40 Light Truck < 3,750 lbs 15.10 3.30 94.00 2.70 Truck 3,751- 5,750 16.10 1.90 96.90 1.20 r-'�Light 1 )ed Truck 5,751- 8,500 7.10 1.40 95.80 2.80 Lite-Heavy 81501-10,000 1.10 0.00 81.80 18.20 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 0.40 0.00 50.00 50.00 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 1.00 0.00 20.00 80,00 Heavy -Heavy 33,001-60,000 0.90 0.00 11.10 88.90 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Urban Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motorcycle 1.70 82.40 17.60 0.00 School Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motor Home 1.20 8.30 83.30 8.40 Travel Conditions Residential Commercial Home- Home- Home - Work Shop Other Commute Non -Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 t of Trips - Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 i of Trips - Commercial (by land use) Water Feature Amenity 5.0 2.5 92.5 000wo43 Page: 18 12/07/2006 8:51 PM iChanges made to the default values for Land Use Trip Percentages Changes made to the default values for Construction The user has overridden the Default Phase Lengths Demolition Truck Hauling Miles/Round Trip changed from 30 to 7.5- Site Grading Fugitive Dust Option changed from Level 1 to Level 2 Phase 2 mitigation measure Soil Disturbance: Watering three times per day has been changed from off to on. Changes made to the default values for Area The hearth option switch changed from on to off. The wood stove percentage changed from 35 to 0. The wood fireplace percentage changed from 10 to 0. The natural gas fireplace percentage changed from 55 to 0. The no hearth options percentage changed from 0 to 100. Changes made to the default values for Operations The pass by trips option switch changed from off to on. The operational emission year changed from 2005 to 2007. * URBEMIS2002 contains a calculation error that results in four times the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) than should be reported for demolition haul trucks. Accordingly, the default trip length was reduced by a factor of four (from 30 to 7.5 miles) to correct this VMT error. w 5 44 APPENDIX D Operational Acoustic Study 000545 Veneklasen Associates Consultants in Acoustics & AudiaVisual Design The La Quinta Resort Pool Area Modification Acoustical Impact on Property Line Noise January 8, 2007 Prepared for: CNL Desert Resort, LLP Hotel Development Company 450 South Orange Avenue Orlando, Florida 32801 By: VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES, INC. 1711 Sixteenth Street Santa Monica, CA 90404 (310)450-1733 Aaron 13etit Senior Associate Robert Robey Managing Principal w 46 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica Califomia 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 • fax: 310.396.3424 • www.veneklasen.com Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 Page 2 1.0 Executive Summary This Acoustical Analysis Report is based upon the mechanical equipment in the mechanical schematic drawings dated August 18, 2006, for the proposed La Quints Resort Pool Modification Project and the expected operational conditions documented by CNL Hotels & Resorts Inc. The findings of this study show that the proposed project will operate in compliance with the City of La Quinta's Noise Ordinance. In addition this report shows that the amount of noise increase over existing noise levels, near the proposed Signature Pool Project, will not be a significant increase. A Company Profile, outlining Veneklasen Associates expertise in the field of acoustical impact analysis is included in Appendix R. 2.0 A brief Introduction to Environmental Acoustics Sound is the physical phenomenon of complex minute variations of atmospheric pressure. Because of the range of sound pressure level detectable by the human ear, sound pressure level (SPL) is represented on a logarithmic scale (mown as decibels (dB). A sound level of 0 dB is approximately the threshold of human hearing and is usually not audible, even under extremely quiet (laboratory - type) listening conditions. A SPL of 120 dB begins to be felt inside the ear as discomfort and pain at approximately 140 dB. Sound levels are reported in terms of total sound energy, Sound Power Level, or amount of minute pressure variations, Sound Pressure Level. Sound Power Level is a unit of energy and therefore does not change over distance. Sound Pressure Levels are minute variations in atmospheric pressure that cause the ear dorm, or microphone diaphragm to vibrate and be heard, or measured as sound. Noise limits and measurements are provided in terms of Sound Pressure Levels and therefore vary over distance. For a point source in the far field, to convert from sound power level to sound pressure level, the generally accepted formula, documented in metric units in ISO standard 9316 is: SPL = PWL+20*log (r)+3 Where: SPL = Sound Pressure Level PWL = Sound Power Level r = Distance in Feet 3 is a correction factor that assumes hemispherical radiation. Additional losses are provided by barriers and air absorption. Because decibels are logarithmic, they cannot be added or subtracted linearly. Instead, it is necessary to add the values logarithmically. For example, if two sound sources each produce 100 dB, when they are operated together they will produce 103 dB, not 200 dB. Four 100 dB sources operating together again double the sound energy, resulting in a total SPL of 106 dB, and so on. In addition, if one source is I0dB louder than another, the two sources operating together will produce the same SPL as if the louder source were operating alone. Thus, a 100 dB source plus an 80 dB source produce 100 dB when operating together. Two useful rules to remember when comparing SPLs are: (1) most people perceive a 10 dB increase in SPL between two noise events to be about a doubling of loudness, and (2) changes in SPL of less than approximately 3 dB between two events are hard for humans to detect. 000-A7 www.veneklasen.com Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report — January 8, 2007 _ Page 3 The image below reports some typical noise levels for reference: Common Sound Levels w.uxm Measured in dB (A) /msem o."vw 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 Aft PPJM Frequency, or pitch, is a physical characteristic of sound and is expressed in units of cycles per second or hertz (Hz). The normal frequency range of hearing for most people extends from about 20 to 20k Hz. The human ear is more sensitive to middle and high frequencies, especially when the noise levels are quieter. As the noise levels get louder, the human ear starts to hear the frequency spectrum more evenly. To accommodate for this phenomenon a weighting system has been developed to evaluate how loud a noise level is to a human. The frequency weighting called "A" weighting is typically used for quieter noise levels which de-emphasizes the low frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of a human ear. Sound levels vary with time. For example, the sound increases as an aircraft approaches, then falls and blends into the ambient or background as the aircraft recedes into the distance. Because of this variation, it is often convenient to describe a particular noise "event' by its highest or maximum sound level (Lmax). Note Lmax describes only one dimension of an event; it provides no information on the cumulative noise exposure generated by a sound source. In fact, two events with identical Lmax may produce very different total exposures. One may be of very short duration, while the other may be much longer. For the evaluation of community noise effects of long term noise sources such as traffic, aircraft, or mechanical equipment the Day -Night Average Sound Level (DNL) and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) are used. DNL averages sound levels at a location over a complete 24- hour period, with a 10-decibel adjustment added to those noise events occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (local time) the following morning. The 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. period is defined as nighttime (or night) and the 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. period is defined as daytime (or day). The CNEL metric is similar to the DNL metric in that it produces a penalty for the nighttime hours, but it also includes an evening hour penalty adjustment. Thus ambient noise measured between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. has no penalty, a +5 dB adjustment must be made to noise measured between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. and a 10+ dB penalty is added to noise measured between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Sound from a point source propagates similar to the waves caused by throwing a stone into a pond. At the initial point of the disturbance the energy is strongest and dissipated over a small surface 00754$ w .veneklasen.com M` Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 Page 5 The combination of noise produced by the equipment serving the Pool Area and the ambient noise level cannot exceed Lso 50 dB(A) at the closest property line during nighttime hours. As indicated in Section 2.0 any noise level below 10 dB will not increase the existing noise level. Since the limiting noise criterion is 50 dBA the mechanical equipment can be 40 dB or less, regardless of the nighttime ambient noise level and comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Thus the nighttime noise limit for the mechanical equipment is 40 dBA. 6.0 Mechanical Equipment This acoustical analysis is based on the Bid Set Drawings dated December 18, 2006 provided to VA. The mechanical equipment that are expected to be noise sources include the pumps, and the air handling wit within the South Mountain Mechanical Room, the condensing unit and draft inducer on the top of the South Mountain, the air handling unit in the Game Room Mechanical Room, the condensing unit on the roof of the Game Room Mechanical Room, the condensing unit and draft inducer on the roof of the North -Mountain Mechanical Room and the air handling unit in the North Mountain Mechanical Room. With the exception of CU-1, CU-2 and HPA, all equipment will be housed in mechanical rooms. The construction of the mechanical equipment rooms is also documented in the Bid Set Drawings. Both the North and the South Mountains will be constructed of 12" reinforced Masonry or 12" thick poured in place concrete with sculpted gunite rockwork to give the appearance of a mountain. The mechanical equipment for the game room will be below grade housed in a poured in place basement. The floor separating the mechanical equipment from the game room above will be 4" poured concrete on top of a 2" metal deck. All the equipment in the North Mountain will be shut down when the park is closed, at 6:OOPM. The majority of the other mechanical equipment will operate 24 hours a day with the exception of P- 603, P604, and P-605 in the South Mountain and P-303, P-803, P-203, P-204, and BL-201 in the Game Room. This equipment will shut down at 6:OOPM. Although much of the mechanical equipment will be shut down during nighttime operating conditions i.e. will shut down at 6:OOPM, VA assumed all mechanical equipment would be operating during nighttime hours as an unlikely worst case scenario. The maximum operational noise levels for the equipment provided by the manufacturer and assumed for this analysis are documented in the attached Appendix 1. The data provided does not show any excessive low frequency noise generated by the equipment, and Cloward H2O indicated that the equipment would not generate any low frequency noise beyond what was documented by the manufacturer. 6.1 Expected Use CNL Hotels & Resorts Inc. provided the worst case expected occupancy information for the future pool area. Based on this information VA understands there would be a maximum bather load of 1,390 and a total chair count of 793. VA assumed that approximately 50% of the chairs and approximately 50% of the bathers are unique occupants, resulting in a maximum occupancy of 1,100 people. The pool area is intended to be open from IO:OOAM to 6:OOPM; peak load times are expected to be mid morning to early afternoon (approximately 11:OOAM to 3:OOPM). Occupancy usage is expected to be approximately 20% from November to March, 30% from April to May approximately 80% from July to August, approximately 60% for September and approximately 30% for October. CNL Hotels & Resorts provided VA with the assumption that approximately 20% of the occupants would be in the Formal Pool area, with the majority of the occupants being adults (90%). It was assumed that approximately 53% of the occupants would be in the Active Pool area, with a 50% - 50% mix of adults and children in this area. The remainder of the occupants are expected to be in Children's Play Area with approximately 25% of the occupants being adults and the remainder being children. 000549 www.veneklasen.com Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 I Page 6 Activity levels of the occupants were based upon activity levels used for similar type projects in VA's past experience (e.g., playgrounds, cocktail parties, and pools). For adults, VA assumed that approximately 25% would be producing noise at conversational levels. It was also assumed that approximately half of the children would be actively generating noise at slightly elevated levels. 7.0 Noise Measurements VA performed noise measurements at several locations around the project site on September 28, 2006 to document the existing typical daytime ambient noise levels around the project site. The locations were selected to evaluate the general ambient noise conditions at the quietest locations. These measurements were used to assume the ambient conditions throughout the project site. VA used Bruel and Kjaer model 2260 type 1 precision sound level meter to conduct the noise measurements. The measurement locations are documented in Figure 1. The overall Leq values and duration of the measurement are indicated in the table below: Table 1 — L„ dB(A) at Measurement Locations Time Location Location Location 11:00 60 64 62 12:00 56 54 54 1:00 57 55 57 2:00 57 54 57 Controlling noise sources were activities on the tennis courts and traffic on Eisenhower Drive. Site observations and measurements showed that the ambient conditions surtounding the area were ,1 relatively close. For this reason ambient measurements at location 1 in Figure 1 were used to assume ambient conditions at location 3 in Figure 2. This is expected to be a `most stringent' assumption, as street traffic from Avenida Obregon would if anything increase the ambient noise level at location 3. Figure I —Noise Monitor Locations 000500 www.veneklasen.com Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 Page 7 8.0 Noise Predictions - Mechanical VA used manufacturer's reported noise levels for the equipment operating under the conditions indicated in the project mechanical drawings dated December 18, 2006 to construct a computer model. The computer model uses ISO standard 9613 to predict the expected noise contribution of the mechanical equipment. The general calculation methods described in ISO standard 9613 are briefly summarized in the Introduction to this report. Calculations were performed at the nearest property line of the proposed site change. Therefore, noise reductions from barriers and existing buildings outside of the project's property line would not need to be a factor and thus were not included in the model. The computer model included 3D representations of proposed buildings and terrain changes based on the Bid Set Project Drawings dated December 18, 2006. The predicted noise level caused by the mechanical equipment at the locations indicated in figure 2 is set forth in the tables below: Table 2 - Davtime Analvcie Lowest Mechanical Total Noise Level Change Location Measured Equipment (Ambient+ in Noise Pass/Fail Ambient Noise Mechanical Level Contriburion Equipment) qdBA I 56 dBA 25 dBA 56 dBA 0 dBA pass 2 54 dBA 39 dBA 54 dBA 0 dBA Pass 3 56 MA >20 dBA 54 dBA 0 dBA 60 dBA Pass Table 3 - Nipht Time Analvcie Location Mechanical Equipment Noise Contribution Limiting Criteria pass/Fail 1 25 dBA 40 dBA Pass 2 39 dBA 40 dBA Pass 3 >20 dBA 40 dBA Pass 8.1 Noise Predictions - Operational VA used an average of noise levels of children and adult activities at cocktail parties and playgrounds measured for a number of previous projects to calculate the expected noise levels at the closest property lines. The sound power levels assumed are reported below in terms of levels generated by a single person. Typical 1 aule 4 - Jounu Voice Level for a Single Person 73 dBA Using these levels and the percentages documented in section 4.1, VA calculated the average (Lso) and maximum (L„a,) noise levels at the expected maximum occupancy. Our calculations were based on ISO standard 9613. The general calculation methods described in ISO 9613 are briefly summarized in the Section 2.0 of this report. The expected noise contributions from maximum occupancy are documented in the table on the page following. Figure 2 shows the locations itemized in the table. 000551 wwwmenekiasen.com �--[` Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 _I Page Table 5 - Rxn.r M Nnicn r—te h-n— r___ n.._. Location Lso Long Term Criteria (Lso) L. Short Tenn Criteria (L.) 1 58 dBA 60 dBA 63 dBA 80 dBA 2 58 dBA 60 dBA 63 dBA 80 dBA 3 52 dBA 60 dBA 57 dBA 80 dBA Figure 2 — Calculated Noise Level Locations Location 1 Location 2 i -Location 3 Table 6 below shows the expected change in hourly Leq levels from the existing ambient noise level to the combination of ambient noise level and noise from human sources after the project is implemented. Table 6- Chnnoe in Nniae i o.I of Vd61n A...h:»n♦r....aa_:__..._.__ Location Existing Ambient Calculated L,y from Sum of Existing Y Change In Ambient Lw Pool Activity Ambient and Noise Level Expected Pool Activity 1 56 dBA 58 dBA 60 dBA +4 dBA 2 54 dBA 58 dBA 60 dBA +6 dBA 3 56 dBA 52 dBA 57 dBA +1 dBA 000552 www.veneklasen.com .�.[� Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 t _ Page 9 8.2 Noise Predictions — Combination The combination of ambient noise level, mechanical noise, and maximum expected occupancy noise will not exceed the-City's Noise Ordinance. The expected sum of mechanical, occupancy, and ambient noise at the three identified locations is reported in the table below. Table 7 - Ez ected Noise Level Chan es from Occu anc and Mechanical E ui men[ N " Location Ambient Noise Level Calculated from Pool Activity Mechanical Equipment Noise Contribution Sum of Ambient, Mechanical, and Occupancy Noise otse Change In Ambient Noise Level I 56 dBA 58 dBA 25 dBA 60 dBA +4 dBA 2 54 dBA 58 dBA 39 TdBA 60 dBA +6 dBA 3 56 dBA* 52 dBA >20 dBA 57 dBA +1 dBA 9.0 General Discussion The noise levels from daytime pool activity and mechanical equipment documented in Section 7.2 will be in compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance. In addition to a Noise Ordinance assessment of a project's noise impact upon surrounding properties, a comparison of the increase in ambient noise levels is sometimes utilized in some acoustical analysis reports. An increase of 5 dB over ambient noise levels would be about the level of perceived change by most people and is typically considered a noticeable increase, but not a significant increase. A 10 dB or more increase above the existing ambient noise level is generally perceived as a doubling in loudness and typically is considered a significant increase. As can be seen from Table 7 in section 7.2, the expected change in operation will not result in a significant increase to any of the adjacent residences. Under the worst case scenario, the increase in ambient noise level at Location 2 only may result in a noticeable increase. For the purposes of this report the noise generated by the Signature Pool project would only be deemed a substantial increase over existing noise levels if it met either of the following significance threshold tests: 1) It increased noise by 10 dB or more over the existing background ambient; or 2) It exceeded the requirements in the City's Noise Ordinance. In this case, this report demonstrates that neither threshold is exceeded. Thus there is no significant increase in noise levels over the existing ambient noise level. 10.0 Conclusion The noise contributions from daytime pool activity are expected to increase the ambient noise level at the nearest property lines under the heaviest expected occupancies. However, the increase in noise above the existing ambient noise levels will not be substantial. Additionally, noise generated by the Signature Pool project is expectd to be within the limits defined by the City of La Qunita Noise Ordinance. Nighttime operations, essentially pool filtering equipment, will also operate well below the noise limits defined in the City's Noise Ordinance. www.veneklasen.cor0 0 0 J 5 3 Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 Page 10 Appendix I Equipment Noise Limits The noise limits identified in the table below are based on the manufacturer's data and the operating conditions scheduled on the mechanical drawings. Equipment Tag Sound Power Level(PWL) or Distance if SPL Maximum Sound Level per Octave Band Center frequency dBA 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz ]kHz 2k Hz 4k Hz 8k Hz CU-1 PWL 80 - 79 79 76 76 68 67 65 CU-2 PWL 90 84 82 89 87 86 83 77 62 HP-1' PWL 80 - 79 79 76 76 68 67 65 Pumps SPL @ 3' 85 - - - - - - - - Mtn Draft Inducer SWL - - 79 83 78 78 77 65 60 Game Room Draft Inducer PWL - - 71 75 70 73 68 57 52 AH-1Inlet PWL - 78 68 58 56 58 54 53 43 AH-I Discharge PWL - 86 75 73 72 72 68 66 59 AH-1 Casing PWL - 77 66 57 56 56 52 41 34 AH-2Inlet PWL - 86 79 68 67 67 65 63 53 AH-2 Discharge PWL - 94 86 83 83 81 79 76 69 AH-2 Casing PWL - 85 77 67 67 65 63 51 44 AH-3Inlet PWL - 78 68 58 56 58 54 53 43 AH-3 Discharge PWL - 86 75 73 72 72 68 66 59 AH-3 Casing PWL - 77 66 57 56 56 52 41 34 • Indicates sound data assumed based on operating conditions. Manufacture sound data should be confirmed in compliance with assumptions prior to installation. 000554 v .veneklasen.com Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report — January 8, 2007 Page I I Appendix II Company Profile Founded in 1947, Veneklasm Associates is one of the largest acoustical, audio-visual, environmental noise, and vibration consulting firms in the Western United States. Technical and scientific diversity, in combination with a premium placed by each individual within our firm on customer service, is our firm's hallmark. Our staff is carefully balanced, representing professionals with degrees in acoustics, physics, engineering and architecture. With 25 employees, we are large enough to represent a wealth of expertise to be shared, and small enough to assure that each project is supervised by a principal or senior associate. Western Electro-Acoustic Laboratory (WEAL), a division of Veneklasen Associates, was founded by Paul S. Veneklasen in 1947 following his participation in acoustical research at Harvard University's Electro- Acoustical Laboratory and the University of California, Los Angeles. It is one of only two laboratories west of the Mississippi accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology for both laboratory and field acoustical testing. WEAL provides laboratory support for Veneklasen Associates as well as a wide range of testing services and research opportunities for industry. Some of the previous environmental impact noise assessment analysis studies that VA has previously worked on include: 20,000-seat Concert Venue (EIR) ClearChmmel Entertainment Tampa, Florida Aquarium of the Pacific HOK Long Beach, California Beverly Hills Hotel Gensler Beverly HdLc, California Chapman College - School of Film & Television ABACUS Orange, California Harvard/Westlake School Latham & Watkins North Hollywood, California Hinson ICTF Expansion Southern California Edison Long Beach, Calfarnia HS&P, Lompoc Facility County of Santa Barbara/torch Operating Company Santa Barbara, California Hyperion Treatment Plain Montgomery Watson/ Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District Solids Technology & Resource Recovery Division Los Angeles, California SP Milling Company (EIR) ESA San Luts Obispo, California Molecular Biology Classroom Building, UCLA Jones & Stokes Los Angeles, California Waterton Expressway (EIR) Vollmer Associates Louisville, Kentucky Multiple Substations Southern California Edison Southern California Two Major Theme Parks (EIR) Confidential Southern California 0005,55 www_veneklasen.com Veneklasen Associates Acoustical Analysis Report —January 8, 2007 Page 12 Appendix III Acoustical Terminology deciBel A unit for describing the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 microPascals. deciBels are denoted "dB". A -weighted sound The sound pressure level in deciBels as measured on a sound level meter pressure level using the A -weighting filter network. The A -weighting filter de- emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear and gives good correlation with subjective reactions to noise. A -weighted deciBels are denoted "dBA" or "dB(A)". Equivalent Sound Level The sound level containing the same total energy as a lime -varying signal over a given sample period. Equivalent sound level, denoted "L,," is typically computed over 1, 8 and 24-hour sample periods. The Day -Night Level Denoted "Ld„", the Day -Night Level is calculated by averaging equivalent sound levels recorded over a 24-hour period after the addition of a ten deciBel weighting to sound levels measured at night, between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Percentile level Denoted L,, percentile level indicates the time -average sound level that is exceeded for "n" percent of the total measurement period. Unless otherwise stated, A -weighting is understood. Example: Lvd indicates the average sound pressure level that was exceeded 90'0 of the measurement period. 0005115E www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX E Reccomendations for Protective Fence at the Morgan House (2006) 000 7 Telesis Engineers 480 Arlington Avenue, Berkeley, California 94707 Charles C. Thiel Jr., Ph.D. Telephone (510) 528-8262, Facsimile (510) 528-8293 Gary S. Varum, S.E. Recommendations Protective Fence at the Morgan House La Quinta Resort, La Quinta, California 1 SCOPE -OF -WORK The Morgan House is a two-story structure relying on adobe load -bearing walls to support the roof and second floor. It is evaluated as posing a significant likelihood of collapse in a significant earthquake. The building is between the nearby San Andreas and San Jacinto faults, respectively to the east and west. These faults are evaluated by the US Geological survey as the highest likelihood faults for magnitude 8 earthquakes in Southern California.' The building is currently unoccupied. This letter report recommends a plan for the placement of fences to restrict entry to the structure and protecting casual visitors from the seismic hazard posed by the building. 2 DESCRIPTION The Morgan House is an adobe two-story adobe residential structure. It was designed and constructed in the 1926-7. Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 show elevations t images of the building from the east, west and north sides. The building has a two-story core and one-story extensions. On the south side there is a shed roof framing a covered porch. There is a partial basement on the south side of the building constructed of reinforced concrete walls. Figure 1 shows a plan of the building. It has perimeter and interior adobe load -bearing walls with a wood framed floor and roof system with clay tile roof. The structure has a partial basement of board -formed concrete walls and a crawl space with adobe walls. The adobe walls are reported to be 17 inches thick at the exterior of the first floor, as well as at the interior walls below the second floor gable end wall. The adobe walls are reported' to be 12 inches thick at the remaining first floor and on the second floor. The interior partitions are wood framed on the second floor, including a portion of the exterior north gable end wall, see Figure 4. The wall shave a continuous reinforced concrete bond beam below the second floor joists and another bond beam below the roof rafters, including along the gable ends of the walls. USGS, 1995. "Seismic Hazards in Southern California: Probable Earthquakes, 1994 — 2024," Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 379-439 Architectural Resources Group, 2006. Evaluation of Adobes at La Quinta Resort, La Quinta, California. Architectural Resources Group, San Francisco, California, June, 2006. Field measures recorded by CC Thiel of Telesis Engineers in June, 2006 indicate that the second floor adobe walls are less than 12 inches thick, measured at 10" at a south facing window. c A semw dory porch 14 D e NrItwtM, Y shed-styre � rod 61 M L mammy Pier K L ® toe story � Q Tao" `Y.l' Mt O tl Adobe hiall to semed moor Sher -style ® PAIDW vmall to real real Wood-uamedxsAl is Winclowvsallwt Aitl llorx �i tf A Pholog. K cu o H Figure 1. Plan of the Morgan house showing the locations of principal structural elements. The boldface letters are the marks for different areas set -back areas for the location of the fence as discussed in the text and Table 1. The roof sections are sheathed by clay tile. The roof over the two story section of the building is a gable roof with low slope. The roof over the one-story sections and the porches are slow slopped shed roofs with clay tile sheathing. The one story former garage section, recently used as offices, has a wood framed wall enclosing the space between the adobe exterior walls. The principal seismic concern for the buildings is the thinness of the adobe walls. Within the two-story section of the building the first floor walls of the two story section of the building have height to thickness ratios of about 5.5 (17 inches divided by eight feet) for the primary walls. The second floor ratio is of the order of 8 for the longitudinal walls and 12 for the gabble end walls. These are well beyond the ratios that are normally considered to be safe, i.e., of the order of 4 or lower. Exacerbating the problem for the second floors the section of wall on the north side that is wood framed (with windows) and for which there is no lateral restraint of the return sections of wall, see Figure 3. Morgan House Fence Assessment Page 2 _ At one location where the support of the second floor joists was exposed, the joist was pocketed into the adobe wall without any attachment either to the adobe or to the concrete bond beam on which it set. The walls support the second floor roof without any rood beams in the transverse direction. The evaluation of the expected seismic behavior of the building is that it will be severely damaged in strong earthquake ground motions. This report addresses how a fencing system should be placed to mitigate the possibility of the failed building posing a safety risk to people in its vicinity. 3 FENCE Restricting access to the Morgan House is required to provide safety. The essential issue is how to accomplish this. Placement of a fence is an efficient way to limit where persons could be in the event that an adobe wall falls during an earthquake. Experience indicates that adobe building walls are likely to fail by falling outward not inward during earthquakes. This is because the interior wall and floor framing limits the displacements inward, but not outward. Often the walls crumble, but on occasion they fall outward rotating about the base of the wall. This latter is unusually, but can happen and therefore is the basis for the evaluation of fence location. The presence of concrete bond beams changes the expected performance of the walls. The bond beams are connected at comers to the out -of -plane walls. They tend to cause the out -of -plane displacements of the wall to be restrained at the ends, and forces a "breathing" action of the wall, with a focus on shear failure, also limiting the ability of the wall to rotate about its base. The principal j impact of this observation is particularly important for the two story high wall sections. The upper sections are thinner than the lower sections in the Morgan Building. The presence of the bond beam in this case provides added strength for the lower section of the wall and forces initial failure of the wall to the upper portion of the wall. The maximum distance that a wall can reasonably be expected to fall is limited by the height above the rotation point where it fails. Determining where this is likely to be depends upon the location and structural support of the wall. The distance away from the building that is safe depends on the height of the wall, and its structural integrity of the fence. Let: H height of the wall above the rotation point, Y The height of the protective wall X The distance of the fence from the adobe wall. If we suppose that the wall is structurally sufficiently strong that when the wall fragments hit the wall it will deform in a predictable way to protect persons at the exterior to the fence. The X can be determined easily as: X=(H2-Y'� s If the fence is not strong enough, then the distance X should be equal to H. For the following discussion we assume that the fence is 8 feet high, whether it is structural or non—structural. This should be tall enough to prevent casual entry to the Morgan House except by those willing to exert significant effort. t 1 Morgan House Fence Assessment OJpi A ou The issue is then to determine what the stand off distances should be for different parts of the building. These will be addressed in the following discussion keyed to the areas of Figure 1. We assume that the first value given is if thee fence has no structural capacity, that is it is outside the fall line. The second number assumes that the fence has structural capacity and that it is 8 feet high. Table 1 reviews the conclusions of the fence set -back distances based on the two different assumptions for the construction of the fence. The structural fence is assumed to be constructed of tube steel columns set in concrete foundations and tube steel horizontal elements that are sized to remain structurally continuous when struck by segments of adobe. When adobe fails, it seldom fails in large sections. Therefore, we expect that constructing the fence columns of 6" diameter Y." wall thickness steel section pipes will be adequate, set into concrete footings about 4 feet deep. They should be about six feet apart, center -to -center.. and coupled with a similar steel stringer at the top and half - height point that is welded to the columns. The inside face of the fence should be constructed of corrugated light gauge steel deck, say 2.5 inches deep. Such deck is typically used for composite steel concrete floor diaphragms. It is chosen to take advantage of impact resilience of the corrugations. The deck comes in 36" wide sheets in 6 to 12 foot lengths. These should be placed at the top of the wall, and the lower 24" infilled with a portion of a deck sheet, or chain link fence. Any adobe pieces that penetrate the bottom 24 inches of the height pose no falling hazard to persons outside the fence. The set -back distances of Table I can be changed for other heights of the structural fence in order to move the fence closer to the building walls, except for the areas where the hazard is posed by the second story wall sections, areas marked B and L in Figure I. If it is necessary to move the fence line closer to the building, then steel trusses can be fabricated that are placed perpendicular to the walls that extend to the top of the wall, with the steel trusses supported by drilled concrete foundations. At the building face a series of horizontal steel beams can be placed just beyond the adobe face to act as restrainers for the wall's out -of - plane displacement. This truss system is estimated to require 4 feet of space outside the wall, thereby reducing the set -back distance to 4 feet. Charles C. Thiel Jr., Ph.D. Gary S. Varum, S.E. TE 908.2 January 14, 2007 ;.; Ty 000-5.1 Morgan House Fence Assessment Page 4 _4 1 Table 1. Assessment of the distances the fence should be setback from the building at different sections denoted in Figure t. The column denoted "non-structural" is for a fence that has no ability to withstand impact by the falling adobe; 8' high structural" denotes a fence that has the ability to withstand falling adobe without failing. Distance to fence Mark Discussion Non- 8" high structural structural A This wall is wood framed and posses no falling hazard. 2' from roof Edge of roof B The second floor porch framing limits the point of rotation to be at 3' from Edge of the second floor, while the continuous roof framing elements that edge of Porch form the roof of the porch limit the height of the wall section that porch can rotate to about 6 feet. The porch is about three feet wide. C This section of wall is one-story high with a slopped roof having a 9' from wall 2' from wall maximum height of about 9 feet. D This section of wall is one-story high with a maximum height of 8' from wall 2' from wall about 8 feet. E This wall is wood framed and posses no falling hazard. Edge of the Edge of the roof roof F This wall supports a slopped shed roof with its maximum height at 10' from 6' from the the back courtyard of about 10 feet. the wall edge of the wall G This section of wall is one-story high with a maximum height of 8' from wall Thom wall about 8 feet. H The wood framed roof extends beyond the wall and limits the Edge of Edge of falling distance. Its depth is about eight feet roof roof J Same as H Edge of Edge of roof roof OK This wall supports a slopped shed roof with its maximum height at 10' from 6' from the { the back courtyard of about 10 feet. the wall edge of the wall L The wall is about 16 feet high. It is a 17" thick wall at the first floor 8' from the 8' from the level and 12" at the second. Because of the second floor level wall wall framing, and the thinness of the upper wall, the first section of the wall to fall with be the upper section, which is about 8 feet high to the roof eve. Therefore, it is unlikely that the whole wall will topple in one piece. Protection is only appropriate for the upper wall section, since after it falls, the lower wall will fall in the same within the same area. M This wall is wood framed and posses no falling hazard. Edge of Edge of roof roof N The location along the south side of the main building where there 2' from roof Edge of is a slopped roof porch, see Figure 1 and 2, that is as wade as the roof first floor is tall. The piers supporting the porch are evaluated as posing a small hazard. Therefore the fence should be placed outside the only two feet outside the limit of the roof, since the tallest section of the wall, the chimney, is approximately this height above the top of the roof connected to the wall. 000562 Magan House Fence Assessment Page 5 re Photograph 1. Exterior view of the east side of the Moran House. Photograph 2. Exterior view of the west side of the Moran House with two garages to the teff. Photograph 3. Exterior view of the north side of the Moran House. Note that the second floor wall has a window wall over most of its length. Morgan House Fence Assessment Page 6 05C3 Photograph 4. Exterior of the enclosed garage. The wall behind the shallow clay the roof section is wood framed. i .. s'�h`= Morgan House Fence Assessment page 00564 City Council Minutes 13 February 20, 2007 ATTACHMENT #2 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 28.33 ACRES INTO 74 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 35060 — LAING LUXURY HOMES). It was moved by Council Members Osborne/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2007-018, as amended (amended conditions as stated). Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-873, ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT OF 74 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON 28.33 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 48 (EXTENDED) (LAING LUXURY HOMES). It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2007-019 as amended (with amended conditions and increasing the tower height as originally proposed). Motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS. OF THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2006-573, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865 FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A SIGNATURE POOL FACILITY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA OBREGON APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET SOUTH OF AVENIDA FERNANDO ON THE LA QUINTA RESORT GROUNDS. APPLICANT: CNL DESERT RESORTS, LLP. Principal Planner Sawa, presented the staff report. Community Development Director Evans address the letter submitted by the applicant regarding resolution of the Eisenhower berm issue, installation of enhanced landscaping plan be reviewed by the ALRC. Tony Lacachiato, Impact Sciences, reviewed the addendum to the Environmental Impact Report. Public Works Director Jonasson, requested an additional condition be added to increase the turn pocket from 80 ft. to 120 ft. City Council Minutes 14 February 20, 2007 Community Development Director Evans stated the consultant evaluated the proposed use and concluded, since the project is not intended for public use and only for destination resort use, additional parking would not be required; and further a survey was conducted which resulted in 70% of the parking was utilized during a Saturday, a high of 52% and low of 37% use in response to Council Member Osborne. Council Member Osborne questioned if discussion of conducting a three-year parking study, once it is built has taken place. Community Development Director Evans stated if the current parking situation is not sufficient, the developer is willing to submit a bond to enable the City to conduct additional parking studies. In response to Council Member Osborne, Community Development Director Evans stated if the City were to observe the traffic and/or parking is not sufficient, or upon investigating complaints, the implementation of a gate would be mandated Community Development Director Evans explained the noise model created and used by the consultant in response to Council Member Osborne. In response to Council Member Sniff, Community Development Director Evans explained the primary user of the signature pool will be hotel guests who will already be parked at the hotel and will access the water park by walking; secondary user will be members who will drive to the site and the resort does provide shuttle service throughout the hotel grounds; and stated the signature pool would not be accessible by the public. Community Development Director Evans stated the total acreage of the project is 4.7 acres; stated there is limited bay parking near the entrance of the signature pool; explained the developer is proposing a wrought iron fence around the perimeter of the Morgan House; stated the depth of the lazy river is 4 feet; and explained the Kirchner house site is the Tennis building in response to Council Member Sniff. In response to Council Member Henderson, Community Development Consultant Lacachiato explained staff requested the amendment. Community Development Director Evans stated the cost was charged to the applicant; explained Public. Works, Building & Safety and the Community Development Departments reviewed and accepted the reports. Community Development Director Evans explained the Morgan House is buffered by a hedge, gate, fencing, Children play area and the tennis courts; 0005r)6 City Council Minutes 15 February 20, 2007 stated the turn -outs are proposed for all types of traffic and the intent is to 1 minimize traffic flow; and confirmed the plans have been reviewed by the Fire Department in response to Council Member Henderson. In response to Council Member Henderson, Community Development Director Evans explained the tenants on the west side are being serviced from the parking courtyards; stated there is no proposed development in the Palm grove area; and stated the current total number of social members of the facility over and above the hotel guest is 928, including parking with 511 golf and 417 non -golf memberships. Community Development Director Evans stated it is the City's police for staff to make a recommendation to the Planning Commission; and explained the criteria of a recommendation by staff to deny the project in response to Council Member Kirk. In response to Council Member Henderson, Community Development Director Evans explained it would be cost prohibitive to retrofit the Morgan House. Community Development Director Evans explained the Morgan House and other structures on the property will be reviewed for retrofitting at a later ( ) time and this issue is independent from the proposed project. In response to Mayor Adolph, Community Development Director Evans explained widening Avenida Obregon would enable citizens to drive faster and that the current street width would enforce traffic calming. City Attorney Jenson stated the Addendum, along with the Environmental Impact Report is sufficient for the Council to make a decision on whether to approve the project in response to Mayor Adolph. Mayor Adolph expressed his concern of the legal accountability due to the transfer of ownership. Community Development Director Evans stated this process is a land use entitlement and all conditions of approval, benefits and liabilities will be transferred to the new owner. In response to Mayor Adolph, Community Development Director Evans explained a meeting between the applicant, Laguna de La Paz Homeowners' Association, and their attorney was held prior to the Planning Commission meeting. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 8:49 p.m. 0bi 000 City Council Minutes 16 February 20, 2007 Paul McCormick, LQ Resort and Club, introduced Rich Sentaloa EDSA, who , explained the design features. i ) Mr. McCormick explained the lazy river is propelled at 3 to 4 miler per hour and is 36 inches deep in response to Council Member Sniff. In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. McCormick explained the rock features are made of shoperete, which is durable. Mr. McCormick stated the lazy river is as wide as 12 feet and as narrow as 10 feet throughout the river in response to Council Member Henderson. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. McCormick explained a hidden staircase will be used to access the top of the rock feature and a rail will be installed for safety. Mr. McCormick explained the waterslides are enclosed from the rock formation with an opening to the pool in response to Council Member Henderson. Mr. McCormick explained screen planting will be utilized along the fencing along the north side of the property in response to Council Member Osborne. ) In response to Council Member Kirk, Mr. McCormick explained the slides will be engineered to accommodate the modest height of 28 feet. David Urban, CNL Hotels and Resorts, gave a presentation of the proposed project. Stated the purchase by Morgan Stanley is of the entire organization and not just one resort; and addressed issues of Avenida Obregon improvements and traffic safety; usage by members; occupancy of 1950; and noise from the facility. In response to Mayor Adolph, Mr. John Pena, stated he personally spoke to Steve Robbins from CVWD regarding installing landscape improvements along the bern on Eisenhower. Council Member Henderson requested the landscape improvement be reviewed by the ALRC; expressed her concern for the intentions of the entire sloped area; and making improvement around the corner. In response to Council Member Kirk, Mr. Urban stated a zone change would be required to utilize the Date grove for parking or extending Avenida Obregon. N 000JGS City Council Minutes 17 February 20, 2007 Wayne Garnett, 74-399 Hwy 111, Palm Desert, representing the Enclave, Mountain Estates, Los Estados, and La Quinta Estatas, addressed issue of the term "water park"; the hours of operation; stated the applicant should have submitted a CUP and not a site plan; and requested the Council to deny the item. In response to Council Member Osborne, City Attorney Jenson explained the difference between a site development permit and a conditional use permit; and stated a conditional use permit is not required for this project. Community Development Director Evans stated the logical extension of an accessory use applied to the signature pool which fell in the pool/spa definition and explained the project is an extension and accessory of the pool in response to Council Member Kirk. In response to Council Member Henderson, Community Development Director Evans explained the difference between the application for a site plan and a conditional use permit. Bill McCann, 79-205 Fox Run, a member of the La Quinta Resort; summarized concerns of residents regarding the impact to the Resort Villas, the Environmental Impact Report, infrastructure, traffic impact to Avenida ? Fernando and Obregon, pedestrian traffic, aesthetics, and property values. Mayor Adolph called a recess at 10:26 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:44 p.m. The following spoke or submitted a Request to Speak form in favor of the project: Mark Moran, PO 1305, Consultant to CNL and Hilton Hotels Dan Hewitson, 80074 Montgomery Dr, Bermuda Dunes Linda Evan Bender, 47-905 Villa Ferenza, Chair La Quinta Chamber of Commerce Mary Dunguns, Desert Adventures Richard Olin, 1022 Sierra Way, Palm Springs Bill Bobb, 48-613 Paseo Terazo John Levin, 73-576 Pinyon Street Jan Pfeiffer, 78-116 Calle Norte Stacy Crary, 3060 Vincential Rd., Palm Springs John Hanson, 3015 Sequoia Dr. N, Palm Springs Jeff Scott, 3015 Sequoia Dr. N., Palm Springs Shaun Sleeper, 1333 S. Belardo Rd., Palm Springs Greg Rowland, 27 International Blvd., Rancho Mirage !0Q05613 City Council Minutes 18 February 20, 2007 Todd Maulding, 78-650 Avenue 42, Bermuda Dunes Michael Islava, 49-499 Eisenhower Dr. Lev Lipschutz, 74-539 Moss Rose Drive, Palm Desert Robert Osterberg, 78-441 Runaway Bay, Bermuda Dunes Joel T. Cutler, 3050 N. Sunrise Way, Palm Springs Brad Benkey, 79-247 Bermuda Dunes Drive, Bermuda Dunes Craig Freeman, 83-555 Lumley Ave. Mike Leones, 83-225 Greenbrier, Indio Mike Shaff, 77-605 Alcot Circle, Palm Desert Jesus Ariedondo, 32-449 Sifting Sands, Cathedral City Tom Schmitz, 6 Calle Lantana, Palm Desert Jon Levin, Palm Deser Bill Jameson, 78-420 Via Caliente Clark Langwell, 44-415 Camino Lavanda Raymond Castro, 52-990 Avenida Diaz Ana Medina, 83-499 Letapatue, Coachella Artemio Olivarez 51-875 Avenida Villa Mark Morgan, PO Box 1305 Roger Swadish, Muierfeild Rd Kurt Bjorcman, 45-040 Bridgette Way Mitchell Cazier, 35-102 Vista Del Aqua, Rancho Mirage Shelli 6tivers, 44960, Malia Circle \ Jackie Mathews, 49-130 Escalante'St. Marian Torres, 39-103 Burton Dr., Rancho Mirage Molly Winge, 45322 Shaugnessy Dr., Indio Jim Burke, 48-255 Monroe Street, Indio Rick Middleton, 52-205 Avenida Carranza Cristian Cascio, 78-695 La Torres Avenue Angie Avalos, 84-511 Calle Cathron, Coachella Ivis Rose, 74-624 Driftwood Dr., Palm Desert Gene Darr, 79-850 Riviera Mike Casey, 51-660 Avenida Villa John Issa, 41-094 Stimson Ct., Indio Michael Afloarei, 78-455 Via Sevilla Dave Doerr, 45-215 Desert Hills Ct. Jim Garvis, 74-350 Fairway Dr., Palm Desert Kimberly Lynch, 78-675 Bradford Circle Mario Irmera, 47-383 Manteca Ct., Indio Lisa Barrett, 48-199 San Jacinto Ln., Coachella David Folkeson, La Quinta Margo Jouter, 44-489 Town Center Way, Palm Desert Henri Gluzerman, 70-200 Chappel Rd., Rancho Mirage John Prater, 201 Augusta Dr., Palm Desert 000-070 City Council Minutes 19 February 20, 2007 Kim Nillsson, 74-794 Lennon PI., Palm Desert Mary Dungans, 74-794 Lennon PI., Palm Desert Kimberly Lynch, Bradford Circle The following spoke or submitted a Request to Speak form in opposition of the project: Edwin & Carol Lynn Mittelbusher, 77-333 Calle Mazatlan, Marie Mack, 74-399 Hwy 111, Ste M Carl Geist, 50-062 Avenida Vista Benita Richard Garnett, 76-910 Ave Fernando Jack McDonald, 49-035 Calle Flora, Tom & Jean Laverte, 48-805 Via Linda William & Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Villa Sierra Frank Hill, 49-921 Avenida Vista Bonita Leslie & Richard Frederick, 49-875 Avenida Obregon Bill & Lillian Bresnahan, 78-425 Calle Felipe Steve Davis, 77-500 Avenida Fernando Scott Holms Dennis Lopresti, 78-120 Calle Norte Ruth Utti, 76-946 Calle Mazatlan Joseph McVeigh, 77-240 Avenida Fernando Ruthann & Phil Maschka, 77-213 Calle Mazatlan Pat Howard, 76-982 Calle Mazatlan Dick Bylski, 76-980 Avenida Fernando Elaine Reynolds, 49-294 Avenida Vista Bonita Rick Lantz, 79-720 Citrus Street Phyllis Rochelle, 77-245 Loma Vista Louise & William McCann, 79-205 Fox Run Karen Miller, 76-944 Calle Mazatlan Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada Richard Grund, 48-810 Via Linda John Rosling, 48-785 Via Linda Jim Parry, 49-654 Avenida Vista Bonita Leigh Charlton, 79-359 Cetrino Bill Puget, 77-600 Avenida Fernando Peter & Pam McKroy, 52-788 Claret Cove Don Bruzzone, 79-165 Liga Dr. Brittner, 76-920 Avenida Fernando Floyd & Kathy Turnquist, 77-181 Calle Flora Maureen Mulligan -McCormack, 77-315 Avenida Fernando Carol Calhoun Wayne GUralnick, 74-399 Hwy 111 Gayle McDonald, 49-035 Calle Flora 00nJ71 City Council Minutes 20 February 20, 2007 Michael McKenna, 76-485 Avenida Fernando William Coblentz, 77-323 Avenida Fernando Louise MCann, 79-205 Fox Run Peter & Pam McElroy, 52-788 Claret Cove Scott Holmes, 78-030 Calle Cadiz Timmie & Hayes O'Brien, 48-840 Eisenhower Drive Nancy White, 49-951 Avenida Vista Bonita John Jonides, 50-820 Mango Jan & Ron Olson, 77-905 Lorado Court Beverly Fauvre, 77-490 Loma Vista Jay Green, 77-285 Loma Vista Morgan Levine, 49-506 Jackson, Indio Patti Palma, 76-995 Avenida Fernando Linda Bender, 47-905 Via Firenze Elaine Williamsen, 78-198 Calle Norte Mary Jane O'Connor, 77-343 Avenida Fernando Bernie Alioto, 77-331 Avenida Fernando Hans Forschner, Navcon Engineering, explained the noise model used for the Noise Survey conducted on behalf of the Laguna De La Paz Homeowners' Association and the impacts to the surrounding residents; and stated the level of noise generated from the Signature Pool will be similar to being adjacent to an elementary school. In rebuttal, Mr. Richard Zilinga, attorney for applicant, addressed the context of a resort with residences; reviewed an agreement, acknowledgement and addendum for the Villa units at the Resort. Council Member Kirk questioned if there is documentation for the Tennis Villas. Mr. Zilinga replied no and stated there is documentation for the Spa Villas only. Mr. Zilinga demonstrated the process of noticing and outreach toward the surrounding residents; explained noise level study conducted and additional noise control measures requested by the HOA; addressed statements made in letter submitted by Marie Mack; stated willing to close night time movies and wave pool during January 1' and March 15; addressed a court order issue relating to parking on Avenida Obregon by a resident. There being no additional requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 12:56 a.m. In response to Council Member Henderson, Community Development Director Evans discussed the issue of showing night time movies at the wave pool and stated the applicant is currently showing movies at the existing pool area. 0005'72 City Council Minutes 21 February 20, 2007 Council Member Sniff conveyed concerns of the prime season as January 1 to March 15; the project being more than a pool, but not as extensive as a water park; the signature pool fitting into the ambiance and attractiveness the resort has had. La Quinta Resort Manager McCormick stated the Resort will be reinvesting in other amenities on the grounds as opposed to any incentives to the members. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. McCormick stated the water issue has been scrutinized and a monitoring system can be implemented if desired by the City. Council Member Kirk stated this is a fantastic project for occupancy, and questioned if this is the location for this particular use; thanked the applicant and opponents for their presentations; agreed there are impacts to the surrounding residents; disagreed with the opponents' counsel regarding the environmental analysis; prefers additional steps be taken to mitigate issues and concerns. \. City Attorney Jenson, stated the City Council could condition the applicant be required to obtain a condition of approval. Council Member Henderson agreed there are impacts; would rather look at water and greenery instead of green concrete; questioned the conditions of the 80 to 120 ft. turn around; and conveyed concerns of including improvements around the corner at the berm on Washington Street; and supports a monitoring plan be in place for the water issue. Council Member Henderson further questioned if the City can require an annual report regarding water discharges. Public Works Director Jonasson stated either staff or the CVWD will receive a report regarding storm water discharges. Community Development Director Evans stated no increase to code enforcement issues have occurred on Avenida Obregon in response to Council Member Henderson. Council Member Henderson suggested to add a condition to review the hours of operation after one year of full operation; and questioned the meaning of "closing" the signature pool if noise exceeds permissible levels established by city ordinance. In response, Mr. Sentaloa stated the signature pool would r close and proceed with the City's normal practice to review the violation. City Council Minutes 22 February 20, 2007 Council Member Osborne stated all issues will be monitored; the function of I ) the hotel is to make money and to increase occupancy; challenge is to accommodate the residents around the hotel; suggested the hotel purchase the Villas to mitigate the effects to those residents; and requested a CUP be issued prior to operation. Council Member Sniff stated the project is lowering to the standards of the Resort; unsure the signature pool enhances the Resort; temperatures in June, July, and August exceed 110 degrees and water in lazy river will become hot. Mayor Adolph stated two issues need clarification: the requirement of a CUP; and report on whether Ave. Obregon is a public or private street. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR NO. 41) AND SUBSEQUENT CEOA COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS, FOR LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB REVISED SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E (1975), PREPARED FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865, AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A SIGNATURE POOL FACILITY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA OBREGON ON THE LA QUINTA RESORT GROUNDS (CNL DESERT RESORT, LLP). It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Osborne to adopt Resolution No. 2007-020 as amended (including the conditions stated). Motion failed by a vote of 2-3, Council Members Sniff/Kirk and Mayor Adolph dissenting. MOTION — It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Osborne to continue the public hearing for CNL Desert Resorts to March 20, 2007. Motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved by Council Members Osborne/Sniff to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Ze ully sub ed, NICA . MONTECINO, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California ;T �: i i ATTACHMENT 4 La Quinta Resort & Club Signature Pool Project Description 000576 Introduction To effectively compete as a destination resort hotel in the region, the La Quinta Resort must continue to revitalize and enhance the ancillary facilities that serve its resort guests. It must also pursue new (and increasingly expected) recreational amenities that will appeal to a wider demographic group in the leisure market and thus increase guest room bookings on an annualized basis. The intent of the proposed project is to accomplish that objective by continuing to capitalize on the existing facilities at the Resort that have made it successful and by introducing new facilities that appeal to the growing family -oriented leisure and group market La Quinta Resort - A Brief History Celebrating its' 80"i anniversary this year, La Quinta Resort & Club, part of "The Waldorf --Astoria Collection," is a legendary resort desfination that has reigned over the picturesque La Quinta area of the Coachella Valley with grace and charm since 1926. Nestled on 45acres, this historic Hollywood hideaway is located in a spectacular setting among orange and lemon groves at the base of the majestic Santa Rosa Mountains. Guests enjoy 90 holes of championship golf on five legendary courses at the resort and at PGA WEST9r 23 tennis courts; the 23,000-square-foot Spa La Quinta®, 41 pools and 53 hot spas; exceptional cuisine at AZUR, TWENTY 6 and Adobe Grill and The Plaza — two stories of shops and restaurants surrounded by flowers, waterfalls and winding paths. The hotel employs approximately 1500 people from La Quinta and other Coachella Valley cities. Key events in the Resort's history include: 1926 Opened on December 26 with 20 casitas, lobby area and one restaurant. 1927 Added nine -hole golf course designed by golfer Norman Beth, the first course built in the Coachella Valley 1937 Added the first swimming pool to the Resort. 1940s Introduced the Tennis Club offering 30 courts witha choice of hard, grass and Gay surfaces. Added an additional 56 guestrooms and additional swimming pools to the Resort. 1950s Added a private airstrip. 1957 Golf brought back to La Quinta via La Quinta Country Club. 1980 Created La Quinta Hotel Country Club offering two 18-hale golf courses. 1984 Between 1980 and-1984, added an additional 193 casitas and suites (269 casitas total) with swimming pools, the original Signature Pool, the Frank Capra Ballroom, and two suites (The Arzner Villa and The Eisenhower Villa). Additionally, PGA West was established. 1987 La Quinta Hotel Golf opened its third 18-hole course, making a total of 54 holes of championship golf. 1988 La Quinta Resort and Club added 371 casitas and swimming pools (for a total of 640 casitas) along with the 17,000 square foot Salon de Fiesta Ballroom, the retail area (The Plaza) and two restaurants (Morgan's and Adobe Grill). This gave the resort the ability to market to larger groups and introduced the retail venue prevalent at many up- scale resorts. 1994 Added the Flores Ballroom to the Resort, expanding its ability to attract group business. 1998 Created the 23,000 square foot Spa La Quinta. Along with the Spa, added the Spa Villas bringing guestroom total to above 800 guestrooms. 2007 Proposed Signature Pool expansion. Although La Quinta Resort & Club started out as an exclusive hideaway, it has become much more. Over the span of 80 years, the resort has added the services and amenities in order to elevate its presence in the market place and continue to serve its members and guests with great care and distinction. in the early eighties, golf was established as a more significant resort amenity. The late eighties brought the addition of restaurants, retail and market competitive meeting space. The early nineties expanded the meeting space significantly. In the lateinineties, the Spa was added following trend of upscale resorts to offer this service. La Quinta Resort & Club Signature Pool Project Page 2 of 5 000517 Current Market Conditions La Quinta Resort & Club's local competitive set of resorts and its regional competition from Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix and Scottsdale have gone through extensive renovations by adding new guestrooms, ballrooms, golf courses, restaurants and most recently dynamic and feature -rich pools. These new features including wading pools, sandy pool beaches, shallow toddler pools, lazy rivers and enclosed body slides, cater to both families and group guests with families. These contemporary pool products are revitalizing the resort hotel market by giving the guests a new way to connect with family, friends and colleagues. The addition of this type of amenity has a positive impact on the financial success of the resorts by attracting more guests for longer stays at a higher average room rate. Most importantly, this type of amenity extends demand into the traditionally poor occupancy periods of late spring, summer and early fall. Many of La Quinta Resort & Club's competitors have this type of amenity already. In addition, others are undergoing extensive renovations of their properties and several new competitors will enter the market in the near future: Existing Regional Competition • Point of South Mountain Resort — Three water slides, lazy river, wave pool with sandy bottom and children's area with water jets that keep kids busy on the water spray deck. • The Phoenician (Scottsdale) — Nine swimming pools, including children's pools with cabanas. Additional water features include the 165-foot water slide, sunset and desert spas, Necklace Lake, lagoons, waterfalls and fountains. • The Fairmont Scottsdale Princess — Sonoran Splashl - A water recreation area with two water slides (186 ft. and 199 ft. long). The pool also has an entry deck area, ideal for toddlers to splash and enjoy the water. • Arizona Biltmore Resort & Spa — A 92-foot waterslide and swim -up bar. • River Ranch at Pointe Hilton Squaw Peak Resort - A lazy river, spacious sports pools spare room for water volleyball games. • Westin Kierland Resort and Spa — A 110-foot water slide, 900-foot lazy river, a sandy beach, along with the volleyball court. • Hyatt Regency Scottsdale Resort & Spa at Gainey Ranch — Unique, 2.5-acre "water playground" consisting of ten swimming pools, three-story water slide, sand beach, whirlpool spa, cold plunges and two poolside bars. Existing Local Competition • Westin Mission Hills Resort — Free -form pool has a 60-foot waterslide and two spas. • Hyatt Grand Champion Resort— Two large serpentine pools, a 60% spiral water slide, toddler size wading pool and huge splash fountain. • Rancho Las Palmas Resort & Spa — Children's pool and water slide, plus a whirlpool and spa pool. New Competition • The Lodge at Rancho Mirage - New management company — The Ritz-Cadton Hotel Company, L.L.C. • Rancho Las Palmas - New owners/management company — KSL Resort, Inc. • Silverrock Resort • Hard Rods Resort • Fairmont Resort • Remington Las Montanas Resort Hotel & Spa With the inevitability of increasing competition, it is imperative that La Quinta Resort & Club add this expected amenity to retain our prominent position in the desert La Quinta Resort & Club Signature Pool Project Page 3 of 5 io 0 0 J 7 8 Project Description Proposed Facilities A new signature pool facility is proposed for La Quinta Resort & Club. This Facility will replace a portion of the existing tennis courts and the main hotel swimming pool, located on the western portion of the property. The proposed improvements would include: an amval plaza at an entry building, a new formal swimming pool and heated spa (pool) with ten adjacent cabanas, two or three water slides that will be contained within the landscaped mountain feature, a wave pool with a video projection screen, a splash -down pool, a lazy river (which passes through a canyon), and a toddler pool with a nearby pop jet fountain and play structure for youngsters. A small enclosed game (arcade) room would be provided as well as a lounge terrace, a loggia, storage area, wood decks, paths, extensive landscaping and decorative plantings. The entire area would be enclosed within a gated pool enclosure fence that would allow emergency vehicle access. The project would replace ten of the existing tennis courts (including the existing tennis exhibit court), a restroom building, the current main resort swimming pool and the existing kids platy area. The existing bar/restaurant, tennisifitness clubhouse, and the Morgan House would remain on -site. The proposed modifications would not alter any of the hotel rooms or change the existing off-street parking supply. Although the number of parking spaces is expected to remain essentially unchanged, some parking spaces may need to be relocated, to accommodate the gated entry improvements required along Avenida Obregon. Proposed Days and Hours of Operation The proposed La Quinta Resort and Club water feature amenity would be open daily from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM from approximately Memorial Day through Labor Day. In addition, the water feature would be open from Christmas through New Year's Day, on Presidents' Day, through the Spring Break period, and one week each November which includes Thanksgiving Day. Currently, it is also planned to be open on each weekend through the entire year. Other Activities: In 2005 the Signature Pool, Restaurant and Stadium Court areas had 160 events (receptions, dinners and meetings), generated 15,500 covers and over $1M in Food and Beverage Revenue. This project's deck areas will also be used for those functions. It is not anticipated that these private events will increase dramatically. Most of this business is related to the group customer. This project will primarily attract a high -end transient guest traveling with family, friends and extended families. Public Address or Music: A public address / music system will be used. However, this system will utilize in ground speakers (as opposed to the elevated pole mounted speakers currently utilized) enabling the amplified sound impact to be reduced from what exists currently. Proposed Staffing A total of 48 people (FTE) will be employed supporting the expanded pool facility. The staff bad is currently estimated to require 19 lifeguards, 8 pool attendants, 15 servers/bartenders. 1 manager, 2 assistant managers and 3 dedicated engineednglmaintenance workers. Private versus Public Recreation Facilities The proposed water feature is designed to be a private ancillary recreational amenity for use by guests of the La Quinta Resort. The proposed water feature will not be open to the general public. Use of the water feature would be limited to hotel guests staying at the La Quinta Resort & Club and the individuals belonging to La Quinta Club Membership Program. Unlike the existing tennis and exercise facilities, member's guests will not be permitted to use the pool facilities. This facility will not be available for use by guests of any other hotel. La Quinta Resort & Club Signature Pool Project Page 4 of 5 000579 Market Focus The La Quinta Resort 8 Club appeals primarily to business travelers, conference attendees, and mature leisure travelers who appreciate the adult focused amenities of the resort. This project would promote a more balanced customer mix of business travelers and leisure guests, groups, families, and individuals. Families tend to book vacations during the months when schools are not in session (the off season at the La Quinta Resort), whereas individual business travelers typically book rooms on weekdays. In the peak season (January through April) the hotel occupancy is relatively high, with a monthly average of approximately 75 percent, and the resort often achieves full occupancy on the weekends. However, the average monthly occupancy rate in the off season is substantially lower (48 percent) indicating a need to appeal to a wider demographic in the leisure market. The provision of this new water feature on -site will improve the hotel occupancy, particularly in the summer months. The proposed change in the ancillary recreational amenities would allow the La Quinta Resort to make more consistent year-round use of its existing entitlements. La Quinta Resort and Club Memberships Club memberships permit non -hotel guests to access the resort fitness facilities and participate in an array of programs and activities including: golf practice facilities, use of three clubhouses, tennis privileges, and concierge services. Club members are also entitled to preferred pricing on all resort golf courses, at all resort restaurants, on rooms for guests and family, and at the Spa La Quinta. Although the tennis and fitness facilities are primarily utilized by hotel guests, they are also available to non -hotel guest users through the Club Membership Program_ The proposed water features will be predominantly used by hotel guests, but will also be made available to non -hotel guests through the Club Membership Program. -SoLa QufMa Resort $Club Signature Pool ProjectProjectPage S of 5 0000 W -- t i4P-i5- gCe0+ - MDS Comsocn �,l ��0 3�i vr,i3 =1't,st m �y..w�a 760-7(7-SXV6 sosA •`7NN;E iniu.E$_€�%11ni—�EPWSVRD �. S4DN�f}ND .ASScG� 3'0. g I06.6 ____ it fh � �r� Gina From: Jenson, Kathy [kjenson@rutan.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:07 AM To: Betty Sawyer Cc: Gina Hensley; Wanda Wise -Latta; Veronica Montecino; Pam Nieto Subject: HELP!! Attachments: Scan001.PDF ,DF t Scan001.PDF (589 KB) Rick Z. is insisting that before / stipulate to add the attached letters to the AR in the Poo/ litigation that I get confirmation that they were received before the Council took their action in the early morning of March 21. Betty, can you verify? There 4 documents attached. 1. A letter dated March 18 to the Mayor from William McCann 2. An all caps submission addressed dated March 18, 2007 from Ms Frederick supposedly submitted March 19, 2007 by Mr. Frederick. 3. An e-mail dated 3.20.2007 supposedly submitted 3.20.2007 by Mr. Fredericks. 4. A letter dated March 19, 2007, to the Council from Hayes T. O'Brian. Can you help me verify whether these were submitted.? Copy attached. OUR DEADLINE for stipulating is TODAY. M. Katherine Jenson Rutan d Tucker, LLP 611 Anton Boulevard, 14th Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-641-3413 Direct 714-546-9035 Fax kjensongrutan.com www.rutan.com <http://www.rutan.com> Any tax advice contained in the body of this a -mail was not intended or written. to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions Privileged And Confidential Communication. This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC H 2510 2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information, and (c) are for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. if you have received this electronic message in error, 1 William A. McCann 79-205 Fox Run La Quinta, CA 92253 March 18, 2007 Honorable Donald Adolph, Mayor City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 RE: Proposed Water Park Dear Mayor Adolph: (760)564-9660 wamccann@cox.net I have appeared before both the City's Planning & Zoning Committee and Council to express my concerns with the La Quinta Hotel & Resorts' proposed Water Park. I do not intend to reiterate in detail over 150 issues I raised with respect to this installation but to hopefully bring to your and Council's attention an issue that was completely ignored by P&Z. The record will show that I mentioned that a "3 year old Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would have to be called into serious question —and a 3 decade old EIR would have no bearing whatsoever in a court of law". Therefore, this antiquated EIR has absolutely no application to current conditions in La Quinta in general —and the resort and hotel specifically. This fact should be self -obvious to anyone attempting to examine this application objectively and fairly. The changes that have occurred in La Quinta with respect to population growth, traffic, parking, water resources, sewage capacities, storm water run-off, detention/retention capacities, development densities, land use and zoning issues, light, view and air qualities; property value impact, as well as the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens that elected this City Council, require nothing less than its uncompromising attention to these issues. They simply cannot be glossed over. I have over 40 years experience as a professional real estate appraiser and in matters concerning land use and zoning and property value impact. It does not take this type of professional experience however, to recognize that a CURRENT EIR is mandated by the facts of this matter. An ordinary layman can see this. I _. A cursory examination of the July 1974 EIR, by Harry H. Schmitz & Associates, indicates that the area of the proposed water park is labeled "NOT PART OF SPECIFIC PLAN". The subject area has been clearly excluded from the 1974 EIR and is a further reason why it cannot be considered remotely valid today,nor has any subsequent environmental document addressed the area, let alone a completely new and never contemplated use of the land. The EIR recites street specifications that were not built to their design standards of 66 feet in right of way for a "loop" street which included Calle Mazatlan and Avenue Fernando; 60 feet for "feeder" streets; or 50 feet for "cul-de-sacs". Moreover, they were not built to Riverside County standards as promised in the 1974 draft EIR. Thus, the circulation element as it exists today, which includes a thirty six foot paved Fernando and Calle Mazatlan (loop street) and twenty foot fire lane Obregon are not even remotely adequate and represent another unkept promise, which has led to the traffic and circulation nightmare we all witness today when attempting to access the present facilities. This same EIR contained calculations of density and open space that included areas that are now substantially built out. Yet there are no calculations made by the applicant as to current densities and open space --either before or after the elimination of tennis courts and the construction of the proposed water park. Tennis courts do represent a form of low density development combined with open space. The courts in question have a maximum capacity (mostly adults) of around 50 persons. This same area will have approximately 2000 or more persons (mostly children) in attendance on any given day. This was not even a remote possibility or consideration in the 1974 EIR, nor has it ever been a remote possibility in any subsequent environmental document. The completely unforeseen and brand new land use also contemplates "functions" of an additional thousand guests on top of the approximate two thousand mostly children using the water feature. Any layman can determine the absurdity of this circulation nightmare and the built in safety disaster waiting to happen when hordes of pedestrians and vehicles ingress egress this facility on a twenty foot fire lane! The 1974 EIR uses Air Quality calculations based upon 1969 through 1973 data. Again, how can this be remotely germane to environmental concerns today? I have examined the SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865 that has been submitted by the applicant. It clearly portrays a major new recreational development "shoe horned" into a largely residential setting with absolutely no consideration to abutting property owners investments or their right to quiet use and enjoyment. They drawings contain many elements of construction and mechanical features that raise more questions than they give answers. 1 11 Water capacities and the possibility of future shortages are not addressed. The noise and/or safety factors of electrical transformers, backwash chambers, septic tanks, storm water run-off, primary and tertiary treatment of water discharge, storm and/or sanitary sewer capacity, protection of the existing palm grove, and again, the very critical issues of traffic and parking. There is no explanation of any attempt to recycle water as is done in other high water usage facilities such as car washes, and various types of planned developments. We have been told that the existing palm grove adjacent to Fernando will serve for parking lessening the open spaces once contemplated to nil, replaced by a concrete jungle. Again, no one has even addressed this impact on any of the City's services, let alone the possibility of flooding on Fernando which already floods when it rains. As a result of these and other deficiencies in the application, both the City and its concerned citizens are expected to take everything offered by the applicant at face value. As a result, I do not offer an ojoinion that there will be extensive environmental disasters arising from the installation of a Water Park in the area Proposed; the cumulative impact from the issues raised above will guarantee it! In addition to these valid issues, please recognize that there are literally dozens of people who relied upon representations of the hotel and resort as developers of the Tennis Villas and surrounding properties, as well as tennis members such as me and my wife, that we were buying into a "first class" tennis and hotel resort. Not a Water Park environment with all the inherent disruptions to the quiet use and enjoyment of the properties purchased, but also to the availability of tennis and related recreational facilities in perpetuity. These marketing elements employed by the resort and hotel are now being totally ignored under the premise that what is good for the resort & hotel is good for residents and members alike This attitude might have worked for General Motors at one time —but look at the condition they are in now! Moreover, to allow the new owners of the hotel and resort to trample the rights of real estate Purchasers and club members, who relied on these representations, could be considered facilitation of fraudulent representations. The unintended consequences of such a radical new development are enormous. Yet in spite of these facts, the applicant has offered NOTHING to the affected property owners in either a property and rental assurance program or an offer to buy these units at their market values BEFORE the announcement of the proposed water park. Nor has the applicant offered to refund equity membership fees to members who no longer want to be a part of this environment. In short, the rights, beliefs, and confidence that property owners and tennis members had in making their respective investments, have been completely ignored and deemed irrelevant. We hope that the P&Z Chairman's comment "Buyer Beware" does not become the rallying cry of the disenfranchised property owners and club members who now feel defrauded. But I can envision enmasse resignations of tennis members and the possibility of a class action lawsuit by affected property owners. As I have stated publicly, "No one that I am aware of is against the hotel and resort or is anti -business': Previous owner/developers have been allowed to market residential units and literally "jam" these units into an area that should probably have half the current density. All on roadways that were never designed or built to adequate or safe standards under any municipal zoning or building code or the Traffic Institute's minimal design standards. The only rationale for such density is the presence and perpetuation of the open space created by the tennis courts. To eliminate the number required to facilitate the proposed Water Park is tantamount to a further substantial and unwarranted increase in "real density" —not just "effective density". This administration may have to live with some of the mistakes of the past. It does not have to perpetuate them by letting the financial pleas of a major company override the very real concerns and adverse impacts that would be further exacerbated by an approval of the applicants Water Park. For these reasons —as well as others —we trust that you will deny this application. Respectfully submitted, William A. McCann Louise M. McCann 6�� 5 ( I `1 Pagel of 3 MAYOR ADOLPH, COUNCIL, WHERE ON OBREGON, WILL THE COMMERCIAL LOADING ZONE TO SERVICE THE WATER PARK AND SIGNATURE POOL,BE LOCATED?. WTHOUT A LOADING ZONE HOW WILL THE NEEDS OF A RESTUARNT, BAR, FUCTION TERRACE, SPA, GAME ROOM, FIRST AID CENTER, DINNING TERRACE, EXISTING TENNIS COURTS, TENNIS CLUB HOUSE, FITNESS CENTER, POOLS, LAZY RIVER, PRIVATE CABANAS, BUILDING MAINTANCE, EQUIPMENT MAINTANCE, PLUS, FUCTION TABLES, CHAIRS, FOOD, TOWELS AND PAPER GOODS THAT WILL BE NECESSARY TO SERVICE 1,800 PEOPLE (THE LIST IS ENDLESS) BE TRANSPORTED?, HOW WILL THIS EFFECT TRAFFIC?. OH AND THE OTHER THOUSAND PEOPLE FOR THE SIGNATURE POOL?. THE ENVIROMENTAL INPACT OF PAVING OVER 900A OF THE 4.7 ACRE PF THAT ANEW STORM DRAIN WILL BE NEEDED. IT IS SHOWN ON THE SITE 1 E 2006-865. HOW WILL REDIRECTING THIS WATER EFFECT THE ENVIRON —•F'�{ WATER GO?. WILL CALLE MAZATLAN BE TORN UP TO ALLOW FOR THIS I WHERE ARE 1.5 MILLION GALLONS OF WATER GOING TO BE DEPOSITED': CHEMICALS AND WASTED GOING TO BE SEPARATED? ARE WE JUST GOI INTO THE GROUND AND ATMOSPHERE? THE REFERENCED SITE PLANS' ENGINEERING DO NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION SO HOW IN THE WORLD CAN WE MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENT I LIVE IN? WHAT EFFECT WILL THE TRANSFORMERS, BACK WASH CHAMBERS AND THE 15,000. GALLON SEPTIC TANK HAVE ON THE EXISTING RESIDENTAL BUILDING TO THE WEST?. ARE THERE CANCER CAUSING PROBLEMS LIVING NEXT TO A TRANSFORMER? HAS THIS HEALTH ISSUE BEEN ADRESSED? WE ALL KNOW THE EFFECTS OF FLASH FLOODS WITH 90% OF THE PROJECT PAVED HOW WILL THIS AREA AND SURROUNDING HOMES BE EFFECTED?.JUST WHERE IS THAT ONE POINT FIVE MILLION GALLONS OF UNTREATED WATER GOING? I SEE NO TERTIARY TREATMENT FACILITY ON THE PLANS? WHAT EFFECT WILL THE EXTENSIVE LIGHTING HAVE ON THE NIGHT SKY PROVISIONS THE CITY HAS ADOPTED ?. WHERE IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION IS LIGHT POLLUTION, OR VEHICLE EMISSIONS AND CO EMISSIONS ADDRESSED? BY THE WAY WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF WATER OR DO WE HAVE AN INFINITE AMOUNT AND NEED NOT BE CONCERNED OR ARE WE BORROWING WATER? IS WATER RATIONING IN THE FUTURE? THE LAST EIR IN 1974 ON PAGE 102 SAYS IT IS OKAY UNTIL 1990 AND IT IS NOW 2007? WHY HAS THIS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED? SOMEONE ASKED IS THIS OKAY WITH CVWD AND THERE WAS A MUMBLED NON RESPNSIVE ANSWER, BESIDES THEY SELL WATER FOR A PROFIT. WHERE IS THE NEUTRAL IMPACT WATER ANALYSIS AS TO OUR SOURCES OF WATER AND THE IMPACT THIS WILL HAVE? WITH FERNANDO AND OBREGON ALREADY OVER BURDENED, CARS TRAVELING TO THE WATER PARK WILL BE REROUTED BACK DOWN THESE ROADS TO BE RETURNED BY SHUTTLE, DOUBLING THE NUMBER OF TRIPS MADE DOWN THESE OVER BURDENED ROADS. WHAT EFFECT WILL THIS HAVE ON TRAFFIC AND SAFTY?.COUNTING CARS IS NOT A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY? THERE HAS BEEN NO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY? IN FACT THERE HAVE BEEN NO STUDIES AT ALL EXCEPT FOR A NOISE CONSULTANT HIRED BY THE RESORT WHO LIED ABOUT LEQS, AND LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT. DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE KIDS YELL"MARCO POLO" IN "SLIGHTLY ELEVATED VOICE." THERE ARE A MILLION THINGS WE HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD AND WE ARE ENTITLED TO TRUE ANSWERS. DO YOU NOT THINK THAT THIRTY THREE YEARS IS A BIT LONG SINCE ANY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WAS DONE IN THE AREA, WHICH DID NOT EVEN ADDRESS THE AREA WHERE THIS NEW RADICALLY DIFFERENT USE IS BEING PROPOSED? HAVE THE EFFECTS OF IDLING CARS LINED UP IN THE SUMMER AND THE POLLUTION IMPACT EVEN BEEN ADDRESSED? IN THE 1997 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A DIFFERENT AREA THE 1975 EIR WAS CITED NINE Sunday, March 18, 2007 America Online: Heirgood Page 2 of 3 DIFFERENT TIMES. ON PAGE 102 IN 1975 AIR QUALITY WAS A CRITICAL ISSUE AND IT HAS NOT EVEN BEEN ADDRESSED? DO YOU REALLY THINK TWO THOUSAND PEOPLE INCLUDING TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY FROM LEGACY VILLAS AND GOD KNOWS HOW MANY FROM POINT HAPPY RANCH ETC. ARE GOING TO WALK? IF THE AIR QUALITY WAS CRITICAL IN 1975 DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE IT HAS GOTTEN SO MUCH BETTER AS THE TOWN EXPANDED FROM 1400 TO APPROXIMATELY THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND, NOT INCLUDING ALL THE VISITORS? WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON CHILDREN AND THE HEALTH OF ELDERLY PEOPLE IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD? WE DO NOT KNOW BECAUSE NO ONE HAS ADDRESSED THIS ISSUE AND THIS ISSUE HAS ENORMOUS ENVIRONEMENTAL IMPACT IMPLICATIONS. MANY PEOPLE CURRENTLY WALK FROM SANTA ROSA COVE, THE ENCLAVE AND THE MOUNTIAN ESTATES TO THE TENNIS CLUB. WHEN THE AREA IS COMPLETELY FENCED IN WILL SIDE WALKS BE BUILT ALONG ALL THESE STREET TO ENSURE SAFE TRAVEL TO THE MAIN ENTRANCE ON OBERGON?. IF SO WHERE ARE THEY GOING OR IS THE STREET GOING TO REMAIN THE MODE OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS? IS THIS SAFE? WHY HAS THIS ISSUE NOT BEEN TRULY ADDRESSED AS NOWHERE DO I SEE SIDEWALKS ON FERNANDO. YOU CANNOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS UNSAFE WALKING CONDITIONS OR TOO MANY VEHICLES; AND WHAT ABOUT THE TRUCKS AND THE NOISE AND THE DIESEL FUMES? WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON THE LOCAL COMMUNITY? WE CANNOT ANSWER ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY ADDRESSED. YOU HAVE A DUTY TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PEOPLE BEING EFFECTED AND THE LITTLE CHILDREN AND THEIR HEALTH AND SAFETY HAVE SIMPLY BEEN OVERLOOKED. WHERE WILL THE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF CHEMICALS THAT WILL BE REQUIRED TO TREAT THE WATER BE STORED?. WHAT PROVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THE ENVIROMENT IS PROTECTED FROM THESE CHEMICALS?. THE PLANS DO NOT ADRESS ANY OF THESE ISSUES DEALING WITH WASTE TREATMENT DISPOSAL OR IMAPACT ON OUR LOCAL SERVICES NOR DOES THE FOUNDATION EIR WHICH DID NOT EVEN REMOTELY CONTEMPLATE THIS TYPE OF BRAND NEW LAND USE ON LAND THAT WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE 1975 EIRI WILL THE RATE OF EVAPORATION OVER SO LARGE AN AREA OF WATER CHANGE OUR ATMOSEHERE?. WILL CHEMICALS BE RELEASED INTO THE AIR?.WHAT WILL THE EFFECT OF MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF HUMIDITY BE ON OUR LAST HISTORICAL RESOURCE, THE MORGAN HOUSE? HAS THIS RESOURCE AND THE IMPACT ON IT EVEN BEEN ADRESSED? WILL ANYONE EVEN REALLY BE ABLE TO SEE IT AND ITS ARCHITECTURE WITH A BIG FENCE AROUND IT? IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE A QUARTER OF IT IS BEING DESTROYED FOR LOUNGE CHAIRS? IS THIS THE WAY WE PROTECT LIMITED HISTORICAL RESOURCES OR DO WE JUST IGNORE THE RESOURCE AND THE SIGNIFICANT DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS ON THE RESOURCE IN ORDER TO ACCOMODATE MORE CONCRETE AND LOUNGE CHAIRS. HAS THE ACOUSTIC EFFECT OF PAVING OVER 90% OF THE SITE AREA BEEN STUDIED?. THERE IS A GREAT DIFFERENCE IN HOW SOUND REACTS OVER A HARD SURFACE VERSUS GRASS. HOW SOUND REACTS FROM AN ELEVATED AREA VERSUS AT GROUND LEVEL AND HOW SOUND TRAVELS OVER WATER. THIS NEW PEOJECT WILL BE VERY DIFFERENT THAN THE EXISTING SITE AND SHOULD BE STUDIED AS IT WILL BE ,NOT AS IT IS. BUT THES ISSUES AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE ALSO BEEN IGNORED. LOOK AT THE REAL PLANS. THOSE PRETTY PICTURES ARE JUST THAT AS IT IS ALL CONCRETE WITH BOXED PLANTERS ON TOP OF THE CONCRETE WITH A TINY LIMITED PLANTING AREA. WHAT IS THE TRUE IMPARTIAL IMPACT? WE ALREADY KNOW THAT THEIR PAID CONSULTANT LIED. WHO IS PROTECTING THE PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ALL THESE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES? WITH SO MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS AND AN OUTDATED FOUNDATION EIR THAT EXCLUDED THIS PROPOSED NEW AND RADICAL LAND USE, THE PROJECT SHOULD BE DENIED. AT A MINIMUM A NEW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED. EVEN IF YOU FAVOR THE DEVELOPER PLEASE REQUIRE AN EIR AS THE TOTAL IMPACT ON OUR ENVIRONMENT HAS NOT BEEN Sunday, March 18, 2007 America Online: Heirgood Page 3 of 3 ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED AND THE RAMIFICATIONS AND LONG TERM DANGERS ARE TOO IMPORTANT NOT TO REQUIRE THE REFERENCED EIR. 5 SINCERELY, LESLIE FREDERICKS Sunday, March 18, 2007 America Online: Heirgood Page 1 of 3 Subj: (no subject) J Z l ,1 Date: 3/20/2007 "` To: RFREDER929@AOL.COM My name is richard fredericks 49875 OBREGON. NO ONE IS MORE FAMILIAR WITH HOW UNSAFE OBREGON IS THAN ME. I HAVE BEEN COMPELLED TO ACCESS MY PROPERTY VIA AVE OBREGON AND THEN DOWN FERNANDO TO EISENHOWER, FULL TIME FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS FOR REASONS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS HEARING. I WILL ATTEMPT TO REMAIN CALM AND DISPASSIONATE WHEN I DESCRIBE THE THREE SEPARATE TIMES I WAS WITHIN INCHES OF A FATAL TRAFFIC ACCIDENT. THE MOST SICKENING AND TERRIFYING EXPERIENCE WAS WHEN I ALMOST RAN OVER A NINE OR TEN YEAR OLD CHILD WHO DARTED OUT IN FRONT OF ME ON A SKATEBOARD FROM BEHIND A CAR IN THE MAIN BACK OUT PARKING FACILITY. THIS OCCURRED AROUND THANKSGIVING OF 2005, AND KNOWING THE DANGERS I WAS ONLY TRAVELLING ABOUT 10 MPH. NEVERTHELESS, IT ALL HAPPENED SO FAST THAT ON SLAMMING ON MY ANTI LOCK BRAKES, I WAS THROWN FORWARD HITTING MY FACE AGAINST THE STEERING WHEEL CAUSING A NOSE BLEED. I WAS ONLY INCHES FROM AN ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED CHILD AS IN GOWING FORWARD 1 ALSO HIT THE HORN FULL BLAST. I AM SURE THE POOR CHILD WAS AS EMBARRASSED AS I WAS SHACKEN. QUITE FRANKLY, AT THAT TIME I WAS SO UPSET, WELL I WILL LEAVE IT AT THAT. ONE DRIVES ON OBREGON AND CONSTANTLY ENCOUNTERS OBLIVIOUS PEDESTRIANS WHO HAVE NO CLUE THIS TINY 20 FOOT FIRE LANE IS A TWO WAY STREET, NOR DO THE CHILDREN ON BIKES, SKATEBOARDS, TRIKES, OR THEIR PARENTS PUSHING THEIR INFANTS IN STROLLERS. IF DODGING PEDESTRIANS WAS NOT ENOUGH THERE ARE COUNTLESS OBSTRUCTIONS WITH PEOPLE EITHER BLOCKING THE ROAD BY ILLEGAL PARKING, OR ATTEMPTING TO EXIT FROM BACK OUT PARKING ON A TWO WAY 20 FOOT ACCESS WAY. THE ONLY TRUE WAY I CAN DESCRIBE THIS TOO YOU IS IT LIKE GOING TO RALPHS FOR ABOUT THRE QUARTERS OF A MILE BY DRIVING THROUGH COSTCO OR WAL MART. THEN IF THAT IS ENOUGH IMAGINE BEING BLOCKE ON FERNANDO AS SOME 60 FOOT TRUCK BLOCKS THE ROAD BECAUSE THE ROAD IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH AND IT TAKES ABOUT TWO MINUTES OF WAITING TO FINALLY GET OUT TO EISENHOWER. IN MAY OF 2006 MY WIFE AND I AGAIN CAME WITHIN A BREATH OF KILLING A LOAD OF GUESTS ON ONE OF THE HOTEL TRANSPORTATION CARTS AS WE ATTEMPED TO LEAVE OUR PROPERTY. I AM INCAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY PUTTING INTO WORDS OUR EMOTIONAL REACTIONS AS BRAKES LOCKED, HORN BLARED AND OUTRAGED GUESTS SCREAMED PROFANITIES AT US. IT WAS NOT OUR FAULT AS AN ILLEGALLY PARKED VEHICLE ABSOLUTELY OBSTRUCTED OUR VISION. WE WERE BOTH SO UPSET THAT WE CAME BACK TO THE HOUSE AND REMAINED. I CALLED LOST PREVENTION AND ADMITTEDLY LOST MY COMPOSURE AND DEMANDED PAUL MCCORMACK BE CALLED AND TO PHONE ME IMMEDIATELY. HE DID NOT CALL. I THEN CALLED LOSS PREVENTION AND WAS INFORMED THAT HE HAD BEEN NOTIFIED AND TOLD THAT I WANTED HIM TO PHONE ME. I NEVER HEARD FROM HIM. I THEN WAITED A FEW DAYS TO REIGN MY EMOTIONS, APOLOGIZED TO THE MANAGER ON DUTY AND WROTE AN EMAIL TO MR MCCORMACK. I EXPLAINED THAT I HAD REACHED MY TIPPING POINT. I THEN CAUSED TO BE MAILED TO THE RESORT AND THE CITY A FORMAL NOTICE OF DANGEROUS CONDITION OF WHICH EACH AND EVERYONE OF YOU RECEIVED A COPY AND I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT DOCUMENT BE PLACED IN THE RECORED. THIS WAS MAY OF 2006 WELL BEFORE ANY WATER FEATURE PLANS WERE KNOWN. I DID NOT LEARN OF THE WATER FEATURE UNTIL MID JUNE. I THEN BEGAN TAKING EVEN MORE PICTURES AND 1 PROVIDED YOU A DETAILED PICTORIAL HISTORY OF THE SAFETY PROBLEMS COVERING THE PERIOD OF JUNE TO THE PRESENT. THERE HAS BEEN NO RELIEF. DELIVRY VANS HAVE NO PLACE TO STOP AND DELIEVER BUT BY OBSTRUCTING THE FIRE LANE. AS LATE AS MARCH 11, 2007, 1 PROVIDED YOU PICTURES OF EMERGENCY ACCESS BEING BLOCKED ON BOTH OBREGON AND VISTA FLORES. IT WILL ONLY TAKE ONE TIME FOR THE SAFETY TIME BOMB THAT IS TICKING TO EXPLODE. Friday, May 18, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 rage t or s YOU SHOULD ALL JUST TRY BACKING OUT ONTO A 20 FOOT ROAD WHEN THINGS ARE BUSY AND KIDS ARE BUZZING BUY ON BIKES, PEOPLE ARE JOGGING OR WALKING DOWN THE STREET AND DELIVERY TRUCKS INTERMIXED WITH THE CONSTANT FLOW OF GOLF CARTS AND RESORT JITNEYS. I SINCERELY DO NOT THINK YOU UNDERSTAND HOW TREACHEROUS THIS IS AND I AM AFRAID NO ONE WILL EVER LISTEN TO ME UNTIL IT IS TOO LATE AND A TRAGEDY OCCURS. THAT IS A VERY UNEMOTIONAL WAY OF DESCRIBING THE HOLLOW SOUND OF A SKULL HITTING CONCRETE AND THE TERROR THAT WILL OCCUR WHEN THAT HAPPENS TO SOMEONE'S LOVED ONE. IF EMERGENCY ACCESS CAN BE BLOCKED COMPLETELY AS LATE AS MARCH 11, 2007, AND I HAVE PUT THOSE PICTURES IN THE RECORD, WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO OCCUR IN THE FUTURE WHEN THE RESORT HAS GOTTEN WHAT IT WANTS OR ARE THEY SO CERTAIN OF YOUR VOTE THAT THEY CAN ACT THIS WAY. YOU MAY THINK 1 AM SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTALY PREOCCUPIED. I ASSURE YOU I AM NOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL WACKO OR AM WAS IN CHARGE OF THE SAFETY PATROL IN GRADE SCHOOL. I AM JUSTA REASONABLE PRSON REALLY, WHO LIKE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU COULD BE PUSHED TOO FAR ,OR WHO AFTER OBSERVING A DANGER OVER AND OVER OR HAVING HARROWING EXPERIENCES IS FRUSTRATED BECAUSE IT SEEMS SO OBVIOUS, I AM UTTERLY WEARY BECAUSE WHAT I AM TEELING YOU AND HAVE BEEN TELLING EVERYONE IS FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE. YOU CAN ASK YOURSELVES HOW COULD THIS OCCUR AND I CAN TELL YOU. YOU HAVE ENACTED A ZONING CODE AND THE ROADS ARE NOT OFF JUST A LITTLE BIT. OBREGON IS 20 FEET TOO NARROW PER THE CODE. THE SAME THING APPLIES TO VISTA FLORES. I DO NOT SUPPOSE IT MATTERS THAT THE VISTA FLORES PARKING FACILITY THAT STRETCHES OVER TENTH OF A MILE IS NOT STRIPPED OR THERE ARE NO HANDICAPPED SPACES, UNLESS YOU ARE HANDICAPPED. BUT IT DOES MATTER THAT IT TOO IS BACK OUT ONTO A 20 FOOT ROAD SURFACE THAT SHOULD BE 36 FEET PER YOUR ZONING CODE. THERE ARE SIX BACK OUT PARKING FACILITIES ON OBREGON, A 20 FOOT ROAD. I DO NOT NEED TO QUOTE CODE JUST THINK ABOUT HOW LONG YOUR OWN CAR IS EVEN IF ITS A VOLKSWAGON BUG AND BACK OUT AND YOUR COMMON SENSE WILL DO THE REST. I SUPPOSE FOR THE RECORD 1 WOULD LIKE THE LQMC ENTERED, BUT REMEMBER THAT CIRCULATION PROMISE IN THE 1975 EIR THAT HAS BEEN CITED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTATION LIKE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS PROMISED A 60 FOOT ROAD ON PAGE 12. HECK EVEN WALTER MORGAN IN 1927 BUILT A FORTY FOOT ROAD. THE PRESENT SITUATION IS ALREADY IMPOSSIBLE, FOR GODSAKES PLEASE FOR ONCE SAY NO AND IF YOU JUST CANNOT DO THAT AT LEAST MANDATE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. AFTER ALL IT HAS BEEN 33 YEARS SINCE THE LAST ONE AND THIS NEW RADICAL CHANGE HAS NEVER BEEN THE SUBJECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. NOW FOR SOME HOUSEKEEPING I HAVE PROVIDED THREE BOOKS OF PICTURES TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU AS WELL AS THE NOTICE OF DANGEROUS CONDITION, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE RECORD, FINALLY PLEASE UNDERSTAND I AM A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND IN 33 YEARS NOT ONCE HAS ANY IMPACT ON ME EVER BEEN ADDRESSED. NOT EVER. I HAVE BEEN A GHOST HOME. NOT A WORD, NOT A FINDING, NOTHING. NOW THEY WANT TO PUT A WATER PARK IN 130 YARDS DOWN THE STREET. YOU ALREADY KNOW THAT WILL TAKE MY PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND YOU ALREADY KNOW THAT THEY HAVE KNOW RIGHT TO PUT UP A GATE EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT GOING TO CHARGE ME. BUT TRY TO REMEMBER THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON ME AS PEOPLE SIT ON MY REDUCED PRIVACY WALL FROM SIX FEET TO FOUR WHEN THE RESORT SIMPLY DID IT AND ALL THE PAPERWORK IS MISSING THINK ABOUT ALL THE NOISE AND THE PARTYING FROM THE YOUNG CROWDS THAT ALREADY COME HERE IN THE SUMMER. YES THEY SIT ON MY WALL, THROW BEER AND POP CANS AND KFC ONTO MY PROPERTY AND STARE INTO THE HOUSE. SOME HAVE JUMPED INTO THE YARD AS IT SO EASY, AND YES I HAVE ASKED NICELY AND AS A NEIGHBOR FOR THE HOTEL TO FIX IT. THEY HAVE BEEN UNWILLING TO ABATE THIS CONTINUOUS NUISANCE. I ASK FOR YOU FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE YOU HAVE BECOME A CITY TO CONSIDER THE IMPACT ON THE LAST FUNCTIONING HOME THAT DATES TO 1928 ONE YEAR AFTER WALTER MORGAN BUILT HIS. 1 BEG YOU TO THINK ABOUT OUR ENTIRE COMMUNITY AND IF YOU STILL WANT TO PLEASE THE Friday, May 18, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 Fage 3 of 3 HOTEL JUST REQUIRE AND EIR. Friday, May 18, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 T. March 19, 2007 You are reviewing a proposal for a new development described as , i O feature, which is in fact a full scale water park with all the bells and considerable amount Of open space Including tennis courts wtll be r replaced with features that include a climbing mountain, a wave Pow, a razy river, swimming pools and a corporate tunction area for parties up to a thousand People. This drastic change in the property will have an impact on the adjoining residential neighborhoods. I he inadequacy of the mtrastnicture improvements have not been addressed by the applicant I have attended all the meetings and have read all referenced materials including an old 1974 tnvlronm meental ingsRepan that is also referenced in the documents. How this out of date study could have any relevancy is beyond me particularly since it does not even address the specific area or use of the Proposed water park, or even contemplate this reduction in open space, replaced by concrete etc. Dear Council Member, Further, as 1 have indicated, nowhere have the Municipality's infrastructure improvements been addressed which include additional eating areas alongside Play areas, and other tacilities. These changes will increase the sanitary discharge flows that conned to the sewage system. Are the existing sewers large enough and adequate to accept the increased flows? Is the treatrnent Plant capable of adequately accommodating these increased flows? Will the existing sewers or treatment plant have to be expanded to serve the new park at public expense? If there are necessary expansion costs who is going to pay, the taxpayers? Will our taxes need to be increased to provide these services? These are questions that have not been answered in the public process nor in any documentation provided by staff. The site plans indicate that there will be septic tanks to handle the backwater flows from the water features. Where does the flow go attar leaving the septic tank? How are the residual chemical wastes handled? These are serious environmental issues that have not been objectively addressed. What type of firs will be used? Will there be a filtration area and if so, where will it be located? It has been noted that in order to operate this water park that over 15,000 gallons of water would be used and disposed every few days. This is an enormous amount of water to be used and what is the source? Do we have unlimited water supply? I have been referred to the 1974 EIR and all that tells me is that there is adequate water to serve the area until 19901 It is now 2007 and do you not think that a complete change in use with the referenced demands require a new Environmental Impact Review? I do. How much water is in the ground to serve our present needs and do we borrow water elsewhere? What is the true impact on our limited water supply and where is the source defined? The current use of the property contains large open space. These open spaces have been capable of handling for the most part storm water.run off and prevented flooding. The new proposal removes the open space. Where will the storm flows go? Is storm water detention being provided and if so how do we T. know It Is adequate'? Will flooding be a potential hazard of mIs project'? 1 ne soils are listed in the last EIR as moderate to severe. Why has there not been a required LIK pertormed to ensure that there will be no damage to adjacent building foundations (HOMES) and roadways. I have noticed that Fernando is breaking up all along the street. Is this caused by poor maintenance, too much traffic, the wrong kind of traffic, or is it storm water problems? In conclusion, there are too many unanswered questions that have not been addressed by anyone. If ever a new Environmental Impact Report was needed it Is now. There is only one environment, and the citizens of this community are entitled to answers. So far we have none. Therefore an Environmental Impact Report is required. Thank you for your attention to the issues raised in this letter. Very ly yours, Hayes 'Brien 48-840 Eisenhower Drive La Quinta, CA f RECEIVED 2G09 Giflfl 20 Pfli 9 ug na C,hiY OF LAQUINTA -6L4a, z . to�t. rage i or i y, Mike Sillers From: Rids Dimassimo Sent: Sat 12/231M 8:45 PM To: Mike SiNers Cc: Bubjecb RE: Lock Out Attachmmtts: At approx. 2:15 am Bill Manson called our office, spoke with Andy, stating that he was locked out of his house. Andy requested his address and advised him we would need to go to Leasing get an extra key. Andy repeated the address back, Big seemed wed about the street name per Andy. Andy advised that the phone call was from BID. He is locked out of his house in the Tennis Villas. Andy said "He sounds intoxicated." Andy and myself left for the Leasing Office. On the way to Leasing Andy made a comment like he was not was not sure about the street name. Because BID had a hard time speaking? Arriving at Bill's place of residence, we observed Bill sitting in the front seat of his vehicle (silver SW parked in the garage. Bill exited his vehicle and approached us, stating In summary that I hoped 1 wouldnY have to set out here for an hour freezing my Butt off. At this time we received a radio call regarding our ilrrre-to Biirs house. Responsed that we are already there. Bill had been talking to Hudson at LP Base on his cell phone, which he then placed on his belt with 1 line still open. I could hear WWlrs voice. I asked Bill who's talking, is your phone on? He checked and turned Wolf. At this point I noticed that BiA's eyes were red and watery, his speech was ok, Ids since of balance seemed Oft. He would sway from side to side, he attempted to garb nsy arm to keep himself upright. I handed BID a set of keys. in summary he stated you guys have keys to my house. Wow. As he approached the door he had an unsteady gate, after three attenpis he got the key Into the lock. With each attempt be would stumble be(*, almost fabling. With the door open he made exaggerated steps through the door way as if his depth perception was off. Unloddng the door from the inside, he walked back toward us stating in summary I really owe you guys. As he spoke he once again grabbed hold of my jacket sleeve as if trying to keep his balance and not fall. At this point we trade sure Bill had keys and watched him enter the house. Closing his garage door as we left. We returned the extra key's to Leasing and cleared. Total time from when LP received the call to completion was 20 min. In 20 years as a Peace Officer and having completed TIP's training, it is my opinon that Mr. Madaon was 647M PC, Public intoxication. From: Mike Sillers Satth Sat 12/23/20061:09 PM To: Rick Dimassirm Subjekxt Lod( Out Rick, please elaborate on the t.ockOut at the Tennis Villas on the morning of Friday 12122/116, at 2:15am. http://psplgexch/exchange/msillers/Inbox/RE:%2OLock%2OOut.EML?Cmd=open 12/23/2006 The City Council c% June Greek, The City Clerk City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Gentlemen: RECEIVED July 5, 2006 p007 MIIR 19VEt'(9 y pj 2007 MRR 19 PfJ CITY OF LA Q I A C rTI" C "f!$trU I C E CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Re: La Quinta Resort"Signature" Swimming Pool I have recently learned that the La Quinta Resort has submitted plans to add a six hundred plus lounge chair "signature" swimming pool adjacent to Avenue Obregon where the center tennis court is now located. I am in a unique and special situation to comment on the undesirability of this plan as it effects the surrounding community, adjacent property owners, and most importantly, the health and safety of the general public. I have owned my residence since 1987, and have seen the Hotel transform itself from a lovely well planned Resort into a thousand room monstrosity that cannot regulate itself, and is presently strangling the local infrastructure. In short, with the present density of users of the Fernando and Obregon streets, these streets are already so heavily traveled and used that they present a catastrophic accident just waiting to happen, the Resort simply cannot add one more person to that density of users. For the last five years Avenue Obregon has been an obstructed and dangerous traffic _nightmare. I have already, on prior occasions, provided documentary evidence (pictures) of the continuing obstructions and safety violations on Avenue Obregon. I am attaching additional pictures to emphasize the point that the nightmare on Obregon needs to be addressed immediately. No one is more familiar or has been more exposed to this constant danger than I am. I have been forced by the inaction of the City of La Quinta to use only the Avenida Obregon Fire Line to access my property. No one is more aware of the unwillingness of the Resort to regulate itself and comply with City Ordinances regarding fire lane parking, loading zone parking, commercial truck parking, RV storage, interstate truck parking,outdoor commercial painting of moving vehicular equipment, blocking emergency gates and fire access routes, (in fact the list is endless) than I am. Since I have no choice but to use the Obregon fire lane to go in and out of my property, I am a living witness to all these violations to which the Resort and the City of La Quinta are totally indifferent. Presently, not only does Obregon serve as the collector street for four The City Council City of La Quinta July 5, 2006 Page 2 hundred hotel rooms with the constant and continuing vehicular traffic that ensues, it is also the main access road used by tennis and fitness members, as well as the street that the general public must navigate to attend and watch a tennis match, visit the spa, have lunch or meet friends. Thus, Avenue Obregon is a constant source of danger during weekends and holidays for children running across the road to swim, play or just get a smoothie. Avenue Obregon is not a regular street. You are well aware that Obregon is a twenty foot wide (measuring asphalt to asphalt) designated fire lane. Nevertheless, because of non-compliance with state and local laws, vehicular parking has been utterly out of control for years. In fact there have been times too numerous to even quantify when an emergency vehicle would not have been able to navigate the lane because of the obstructions. I am not writing this letter as one who had been damaged by City zoning and regulatory practices. Rather, I am writing on behalf of the hundreds of other property owners, guests, visitors, and the public at large who will be at risk if another pool is approved adjacent to Obregon. I am not even speaking of the proposed water park, which is so absurd, that I do not even believe Kabul or Bulgarian authorities would have countenanced its desirability. The present circulatory element of the General Plan cannot possibly be consistent with the mayhem on Obregon. This twenty- foot fire lane not only serves as the main collector street for four hundred hotel rooms, and the pedestrian promenade for hotel guests, tennis players, skateboarders, roller bladers, aerobic walkers and joggers, but also as the main thoroughfare for commercial deliveries of everything from pepsi cola to bottled water, not to mention other commercial trucks delivering equipment to set up for special functions at the present pool, La Casa, or at the land area adjacent to Fernando and Obregon. In addition, hotel jitneys, golf carts, and other motorized hotel service vehicles travel the designated fire lane non-stop throughout the day and night. The present situation on Obregon, which is already dangerous as it is, will further be aggravated with the completion of Legacy Villas north of Fernando. This development, which is now under construction, when completed, will add two hundred and eighty housing units to the area. Every purchaser of a unit at the Legacy Villas had been given membership in the Resort Tennis Club. Furthermore, when purchasers place their homes in the rental program, the renter is allowed full use of the Club facilities adjacent to Obregon. The City Council City of La Quinta July 5, 2006 Page 3 Consequently, it is misleading, if not a total misrepresentation, for anyone to state that the new pool will only be available for the exclusive use of members and hotel guests. The plain truth is that the present facility is and will be available for members, hotel guests, new purchasers of Legacy Villas who are given a membership in their purchase price, renters of Legacy Villas, and renters of any property whether it is in Santa Rosa Cove, Mountain Estates, or the La Quinta Country Club, or anywhere, for that matter, so long as it is rented through the Resort subsidiary. You have seen the documentary evidence of the present safety and circulatory problems on Obregon. Any reasonable person can do the math and recognize the impact this increase in density is going to have on this already overburdened infrastructure. A new water feature where center court presently sits will simply attract hundreds and hundreds of more people driving on Obregon, searching for parking that does not exist, and hundreds of additional pedestrians crossing Obregon, or adding to it's use as a promenade. In all cases, an already dangerous circulatory situation will only be made much worse. I have personally interviewed the executives of Hilton, the Resort and CNL. I have specifically asked them if there has been any impact study done by themselves, or by anyone, evaluating the impact this project will have on the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent property and their answer was NO. I then asked if there had been any impact evaluation or traffic study done by themselves or anyone on the circulatory element, as it relates to the proposed development and again the answer was NO. I asked them if they could even tell me how much parking was presently designated for tennis, fitness, and hotel guests presently regarding Obregon, and their answer was that it was simply open parking. Finally, I asked if there had been any impact study done by themselves or by anyone regarding the noise element their project would have on the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent property, and the answer was NO. They informed me that they had received acoustical advice in preparing their plans. I will quote a statement, which I wrote down at the time, of Jeanne Diaz, one the Hilton representatives: "[W]e do not need to do any studies." The general impression from past experience is that the Hotel must believe if "we want it, we get it", and the public, and surrounding neighborhood or adjacent property owners are not even a consideration. It is not for me to question what happened in the past or how this present unsafe predicament was allowed to occur unchecked. It is my hope that La Quinta is now a mature City; that there are those in City government who will recognize the seriousness of what I have presented here which is based on The City Council City of La Quinta July 5, 2006 Page 4 nothing less than my actual and real life observations, over a period of many years. The simple and incontrovertible fact is that the Hotel has had many years and opportunities to regulate itself and to seriously evaluate and deal with safety, density, obstructions, illegal parking, and multiple illegal uses of it's property and it has failed to do so. The present plan for a pool only, is not acceptable, let alone anything beyond that. It should not require a catastrophic event to stop unsafe development, or compel a corporate citizen to comply with the Municipal Code of this City. I do not believe it is too late to rein in the monstrosity that the Resort has turned into. If a "Signature Pool" is an enhancement, then let the ownership look within the interior of the present Hotel, and replace the original main pool which was removed, thereby avoiding a senseless aggravation of the present unsafe circulation conditions on Obregon, or destroying the character of the surrounding neighborhood or adjacent properties. The environmental impact in terms of air pollution, noise, light pollution, and its effect on our currently dwindling wildlife, which apparently had not been considered by anyone, is beyond the scope of this letter. This highly critical concern, however, should not be overlooked. Encls. Cc: Hon. Mayor Donald Adolph Hon. Mayor Pro Tern Stanley Sniff Council Members: Tom Kirk Terry Henderson Lee Osborne P, William A. McCann 79-205 Fox Run La Quinta, CA 92253 March 18, 2007 Honorable Donald Adolph, Mayor City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 RE: Proposed Water Park Dear Mayor Adolph: RECEIVED 2097 / 88 20 OF P�j760) 564-9650 CIT t�am4cch*@cox.net CITY CLE8IL SQOFE CE I have appeared before both the City's Planning & Zoning Committee and Council to express my concerns with the La Quinta Hotel & Resorts' proposed Water Park. I do not intend to reiterate in detail over 150 issues I raised with respect to this installation but to hopefully bring to your and Council's attention an issue that was completely ignored by P&Z. The record will show that I mentioned that a "3 year old Environmental Impact Report (E/R) would have to be called into serious question —and a 3 decade old EIP would have no bearing whatsoever in a court of law" Therefore, this antiquated EIR has absolutely no application to current conditions in La Quinta in general —and the resort and hotel specifically. This fact should be self -obvious to anyone attempting to examine this application objectively and fairly. The changes that have occurred in La Quinta with respect to population growth traffic, parking, water resources, sewage capacities, storm water run-off, detention/retention capacities, development densities, land use and zoning issues, light, view and air qualities; property value impact, as well as the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens that elected this City Council, require nothing less than its uncompromising attention to these issues. They simply cannot be -glossed over. I have over 40 years experience as a professional real estate appraiser and in matters concerning land use and zoning and property value impact. It does not take this type of professional experience however, to recognize that a CURRENT EIP is mandated by the facts of this matter. An ordinary layman can see this. A cursory examination of the July 1974 EIR, by Harry H. Schmitz & Associates indicates that the area of the proposed water park is labeled "NOT PART OF SPECIFIC PLAN". The subject area has been clearly excluded from the 1974 EIR and is a further reason why it cannot be considered remotely valid today. The EIR recites street specifications that were not built to their design standards of 66 feet in width for a "loop" street; 60 feet for "feeder' streets; or 50 feet for "cul-de-sacs". Moreover, they were not built to Riverside County standards as stated. This same EIR contained calculations of density and open space that included areas that are now substantially built out. Yet there are no calculations made by the applicant as to current densities and open space --either before or after the elimination of tennis courts and the construction of the proposed water park. Tennis courts do represent a form of low density development combined with open space. The courts in question have a maximum capacity (mostly adults) of around 50 persons. This same area will have approximately 1200 or more persons (mostly children) in attendance on any given day. This was not even a remote possibility or consideration in the 1974 EIR. The 1974 EIR uses Air Quality calculations based upon 1969 through 1973 data. Again, how can this be remotely germane to environmental concerns today? I have examined the SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865 that has been submitted by the applicant. It clearly portrays a major new recreational development "shoe horned" into a largely residential setting with absolutely no consideration to abutting property owners' investments or their right to quiet use and enjoyment. These drawings contain many elements of construction and mechanical features that raise more questions than they give answers. Water capacities and the possibility of future shortages are not addressed. The noise and/or safety factors of electrical transformers, backwash chambers, septic tanks, storm water run-off, primary and tertiary treatment of water discharge, storm and/or sanitary sewer capacity, protection of the existing palm grove, and again, the very critical issues of traffic and parking. There is no explanation of any attempt to recycle water as is done in other high water usage facilities such as car washes, and various types of planned developments. As a result of these and other deficiencies in the application, both the City and its concerned citizens are expected to take everything offered by the applicant at face value. As a result, I do not offer an o inion that there will be extensive problems arising from the installation of a Water Park in the area proposed; the cumulative impact from the issues raised above will guarantee it! In addition to these valid issues, please recognize that there are literally dozens of people who relied upon representations of the hotel and resort as developers of the Tennis Villas and surrounding properties, as well as tennis members such as me and my wife that we were buying into a "first class" tennis and hotel resort. Not a Water Park environment with all the inherent disruptions to the quiet use and enjoyment of the properties purchased, but also to the availability of tennis and related recreational facilities in perpetuity. These marketing elements employed by the resort and hotel are now being totally ignored under the premise that what is good for the resort & hotel is good for residents and members alike. This attitude might have worked for General Motors at one time —but look at the condition they are in now! Moreover, to allow the new owners of the hotel and resort to trample the rights of real estate purchasers and club members, who relied on these representations, could be considered facilitation of fraudulent representations. Yet in spite of these facts, the applicant has offered NOTHING to the affected property owners in either a property and rental assurance program or an offer to buy these units at their market values BEFORE the announcement of the proposed water park. Nor has the applicant offered to refund equity membership fees to members who no longer want to be a part of this environment. In short, the rights, beliefs, and confidence that property owners and tennis members had in making their respective investments, have been completely negated. We hope that the P&Z Chairman's comment "Buyer Beware" does not become the rallying cry of the disenfranchised property owners and club members who now feel defrauded. But I can envision enmasse resignations of tennis members and the possibility of a class action lawsuit by affected property owners. As I have stated publicly, "No one that I am aware of is against the hotel and resort or is anti -business" Previous owner/developers have been allowed to market residential units and literally "jam" these units into an area that should probably have half the current density. All on roadways that were never designed or built to adequate or safe standards under any municipal zoning or building code or the Traffic Institute's minimal design standards. The only rationale for such density is the presence and perpetuation of the open space created by the tennis courts. To eliminate the number of courts required to facilitate the proposed Water Park is tantamount to a further substantial and unwarranted increase in "real density" —not just "effective density". Please remember that there are two elements of density. One is the number, size, and bulk of the improvements; the other is the number of people that the development brings to an area. In this situation, we are observing both "bulk" and potential "user" population that exceeds anything ever imagined in the 1974 EIR with the proposed water park. This administration may have to live with some of the mistakes of the past. It does not have to perpetuate them by letting the financial pleas of a major company override the very real concerns and adverse impacts that would be further exacerbated by an approval of the applicants Water Park. For these reasons —as well as others —we trust that you will deny this application. Respectfully submitted, William A. McCann Louise M. McCann To Whom It May Concern: C' ' r Co u'3u RECEIVED My name is Mike Sillers, and as of January 2007 I had bee3U**4dJ]4t II11fl" S9 Quinta Resort for over five years as Hotel Manager on Duty, and thdiLlaia -Ad DOW TA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Prevention of the La Quinta Resort and Club. I have been asked by a few concerned homeowners to share my opinion regarding the construction of the upcoming Water Park at Fernando and Obregon. In these five years I had an opportunity to observe and deal with all problems related to traffic and parking. Properly handling the parking and traffic congestion that regular events generate has been challenging to the resort. I share in the concerns of the residents regarding this new construction. My two primary areas of concern are the resort's ability to sustain its current daily operations, and the understaffed Loss Prevention Department whose responsibility it is to oversee the safety and enforcement of traffic, parking, and pedestrian control on behalf of the guests and homeowners. I also had an opportunity to witness the construction of the resort homes (I600's) and the renovation of the spa pool in the year 2000. I can honestly say that because of the road dimensions of Fernando and Obregon, it was a colossal disaster of dirt, noise and traffic congestion making it unsafe for vehicles and pedestrians alike. As the hotel manager on duty at the time, I dealt with complaints from homeowners and guests on a daily basis regarding the dirt, noise, and traffic congestion. I am also a retired Los Angeles Policeman and in my twenty-one years on LAPD, I had an opportunity to work many major events. I worked for the Republican and Democratic National Conventions, the Papal Visit, as well as many other visits from high-ranking dignitaries who visited Los Angeles. I worked concerts by major recording artists, also marry major sporting events in Los Angeles, including Major League baseball (Dodger Baseball and The World Series), the National Football League (Raiders Football and The Super Bowl), and the National Basketball Association (LA Lakers and The NBA Championship). I also worked the 14$4 Olympics; add to that parades and disasters in the city of Los Angeles. During many of these major events I assisted in the planning and organization of the event's traffic, parking, and crowd control to ensure a safe and successful event environment for both organizers and attendees alike. It should be noted that the safety and success of each of these events was due in part by the organizers, planners, and the city's forethought to having and making sure they had access to wide and open thorough fairs for traffic, pedestrians, and emergency vehicles, and having ample parking available. I do feel that my twenty-one years of experience in Los Angeles working and planning major events, and observing the hotel's unique traffic, parking, and pedestrian problems for the past five years, does give me a firm grasp of what roadways and locations can prudently sustain a safe and healthy environment for traffic, parking, and pedestrians. And I can honestly state that the area of Obregon and Fernando cannot and will not ever be able to safely sustain the vehicle traffic, parking, and pedestrian traffic it is sure to create in it's current state. It should be noted that over a year ago, Hilton's top Loss Prevention people came to the La Quinta Resort to complete a Safety and Security Evaluation of the Hotel. After spending a week with myself and Director Frank Leach, their first recommendation before any plans for expansions or additions (i.e. water park) could be entertained, they felt it was imperative to address an immediate increase in the staff of the Loss Prevention Department by doubling it's size in order to effectively and safely manage the Hotel's needs fast. As we speak, the conclusions and recommendations resulting from the Hilton's Safety and Security Evaluation have not been addressed. At the time of the evaluation, the Loss Prevention Department had approximately fourteen staff members (for three shifts, twenty-four hours a day) responsible for the safety and security of over fifty acres of hotel property, eight hundred fifty rooms, and a golf course. Not one staff member has been added. To the contrary, since the passing of Director Frank Leach the new Director of Loss Prevention has callously mismanaged an already fragile department causing six experienced staff members (including the wrongful termination of myself) to feel no alternative but to leave the department, and as of yet, have not been replaced. In conclusion, if the purposed Water Park is allowed to be constmeW without addressing the above major concerns, the traffic, parking, and crowd control at Fernando and Obregon will be unmanageable, unbearable, and unsafe for homeowners and guests alike. Thank you, "Sa9 Mike Sillers March 19, 2007 N c> o o m � F , rn co c7 Dear Council Member, rn u, o -v < 73 m You are reviewing a proposal for a new development described as'a water o feature, which is in fact a full scale water park with all the bells ansties . A considerable amount of open space including tennis courts will be removeiRand replaced with features that include a climbing mountain, a wave pool, a lazy river, swimming pools and a corporate tunction area for parties up to a thousand people. This drastic change in the property will have an impact on the adjoining residential neighborhoods. I he inadequacy of the intrastructure improvements have not been addressed by the applicant. I have attended all the meetings and have read all reterenced materials including an old 1974 Environmental Report, that is also referenced in the documents. How this out of date study could have any relevancy is beyond me particularly since it does not even address the specific area or use of the proposed water park, or even contemplate this reduction in open space, replaced by concrete etc. Further, as I have indicated, nowhere have the Municipality s intrastructure improvements been addressed which include additional eating areas alongside play areas, and other facilities. These changes will increase the sanitary discharge flows that connect to the sewage system. Are the existing sewers large enough and adequate to accept the increased tows? Is the treatment plant capable of adequately accommodating these increased flows? Will the existing sewers or treatment plant have to be expanded to serve the new park at public expense? If there are necessary expansion costs who is going to pay, the taxpayers? Will our taxes need to be increased to provide these services? These are questions that have not been answered in the public process nor in any documentation provided by staff. The site plans indicate that there will be septic tanks to handle the backwater flows from the water features. Where does the flow go after leaving the septic tank? How are the residual chemical wastes handled? These are serious environmental issues that have not been objectively addressed. What type of filters will be used? Will there be a filtration area and if so, where will it be located? It has been noted that in order to operate this water park that over 15,000 gallons of water would be used and disposed every few days. This is an enormous amount of water to be used and what is the source? Do we have unlimited water supply? I have been referred to the 1974 EIR and all that tells me is that there is adequate water to serve the area until 19901 It is now 2007 and do you not think that a complete change in use with the referenced demands require a new Environmental Impact Review? I do. How much water is in the ground to serve our present needs and do we borrow water elsewhere? What is the true impact on our limited water supply and where is the source defined? The current use of the property contains large open space. These open spaces have been capable of handling for the most part storm water run off and prevented flooding. The new proposal removes the open space. Where will the storm flows go? Is storm water detention being provided and if so how do we know it is adequate? Will tloodmg be a potential hazard of this project'! I he soils are listed in the last EIR as moderate to severe. Why has there not been a required EIR performed to ensure that there will be no damage to adjacent building foundations (HOMES) and roadways. I have noticed that Fernando is breaking up all along the street. Is this caused by poor maintenance, too much traffic, the wrong kind of traffic, or is it storm water problems? In conclusion, there are too many unanswered questions that have not been addressed by anyone. If ever a new Environmental Impact Report was needed it is now. There is only one environment, and the citizens of this community are entitled to answers. So far we have none. Therefore an Environmental Impact Report is required. Thank you for your attention to the issues raised in this letter. Ve truly yours, II Q� Hayes . O'Brien 48-840 Eisenhower Drive La Quinta, CA S. McKenna 76985 Avenida Fernando La Quinta, CA 92253 March I8, 2007 To: La Quinta City Council RECEIVED 2007 MRH 19 PIS 4 01 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE The objections to the proposed water park have been made forcefully and clearly to the Council. I would add for your consideration and the record the following:- 1. The demolition of tennis courts is potentially hazardous to the health of all of those in La Quinta. Have the developers been required to submit a current Environmental Impact Report? If not, why not? 2. The Resort refers to use by guests and members as they now include Legacy Villas as part of the Resort (source the Resorts own Marketing Department) this is now over 1000 rooms. With Hilton operating a 400 room hotel across from the tennis garden are we to assume these to are guests? How will these folks from outside the Resort travel to it — by car! Has it escaped the notice of those charged by City Council with providing information that for much of the summer the main parking area of the Resort is under canvas as temporary meeting space enabling the much lauded high occupancy of the past two years due to increased convention business. I understand the need for progress and growth but don't understand why a water park is the answer in a facility that has been renowned for its tennis and history. SinCor€ly,, Susan McKenna M.C. McKenna 76985 Avenida Fernando LaQuinta, CA 92253 La Quinta City Council, RECEIVED 2007 MHR 19 PHi 9 Cp It occurred to me as I took someone to the airport and noticed the c loud of smog hangi6JTiYe�e 1 that nothing pertaining to air quality has been analyzed or it's impact on the citizens W I N TA community and impacted property owners has been analyzed relative to the propos�wa�ter qa F F I C E Quinta Resort, right in the heart of the residential community. I am attaching and including a letter sent to your planning department and obviously ignored. Please make sure this is part of the record, because I share with the author the same and similar concerns and also cannot understand how a project of this size and one that is on a site that has never been environmentally analyzed could ever be approved with out an EIR. I share with the rest of the community the negative impacts of noise, traffic, destroyed property values, water shortages, fear of hazardous waste disposal and their impacts on the neighborhood and after reviewing the scant environmental assessment I am utterly outraged that an Environmental Impact Report has not been required for a complete change of use from open land and tennis courts, to an intensive use water park with plans for two thousand people a day in attendance. I called the Resort and spoke to marketing and asked how many rooms they now offered and was told over a thousand. When I told them I thought there were only eight hundred I was informed that the Resort has expanded with the inclusion of Legacy Villas, which I am informed, was adjacent to the property on Eisenhower. Please explain how our present infrastructure is going to handle that kind of traffic. It is obvious that two thousand plus people attracted to a water park in the summer are going to be coming by car. When I referenced your environmental material I noted that everything kept referencing a 1975 EIR. So I secured that document and note that on page 102 that the air quality of the Coachella Valley was a "critical factor" and that was thirty-seven years ago with a population of 1400. Presently, Riverside County ranks as among the dir iest/worst ten per cent of all counties in the United States; that Riverside County already suffers more than forty days per year of unhealthy and very unhealthy air quality, all of which occur during the SUMMER months (Scorecard, The Pollution Information Site. bttp//www.scorecard.org/community/cmy-cap- psi.td/fips county code=06065&name=Riverside@zip code=92253. By putting thousands of additional vehicles into our community during a time of the year that has the worst air quality exacerbating these unhealthy conditions and jeopardizing the health of our children, is a hugely significant impact that at the very least calls for an environmental impact report. Furthermore, neither the City nor the applicant has told us how many additional truck trips per day will be needed to supply the almost 2000 people per day with food, drink, chemicals, and all the sundries assorted with such an utterly complete and different use of the land. There are a great many people who have located to this area for health reasons, as well as tranquility, and now the Resort threatens to destroy both. We already know how clogged and dangerous Avenue Obregon is and this to will only get more dangerous with the more traffic on a 20 foot fire lane which is supposed to collect and distribute people to a water park. There has never been a time when an environmental impact report was more necessary and myself and my friends in the Resort residential community who ill be severely impaled by this proposed new use of the land area, respectfully demand one for all of et asons set fqrth,fiiost importantly air quality. M. C. McKenna March 18, 2007 ' MAR. 1§. 2001 1:46PM CQBLENTZ, & �S ,LD. LLMW Waam K OWlinte Dry' ect (415) TT2-6713 Emmtik vM 04;96 111 VIA EMAIL COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS August SO, 2006 Mr. Stan Sawa Prrincipal Planner City of La Quinta Community-Dovolopmont Dcparl wont 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California Re: Sianoture Pool Dear Mr. Sawa: NO.390 F. i QekMbJd+9.Sufit wo m*; 415JMAWO Sa W&A ralrnmis la: 41SM1653 0d1114213 "b: r Mblsmabw P As a resident of 77-323 Avenida Fernando, in close proximity to the proposed project, i believe this project requires an Environmental impact Report (EIR), rather than a negative declaration or a mitigated negative declaration before it proceeds: There are four Issues that need study which would likely cause signifioant impacts: noise, traffic, air quafrty and visual impacts. Each of these are briefly discussed below, with examples of why these impacts are likely to be significant. 1) Noise. This will be an amusement park with crowds and rides. The rides will un!juttdur rluiuu burn tilt: individual+ an the rides, and frael lke rides themselves. This Issue should be assessed in an EIR. 2) Air Quaitty. The air quality impacts for this development will be ai�otrica.-, {. The OvuU. ^Wart At. OWrltty Cisbt.--L (9CAQMI3) recommends thresholds for significance for any project within Im boundaries. _Palm Springs and-theareas surrcaunding .are -within tFie--; btwndaniIcp of �a P;6ACiMD. The SGAWD'l1as atgHkloa1lee threaholdla tar beN+ eenebWetien and ape ek:ano, and iF,a nawr da+olopmonk will lilaaly bo ov.sr tF,a Mrrwr,orda ror bvui priaarw or „w cq�...rwr.•'.r.w r-.^. ...x.MMc .rr nitrogen. Uke operatioltal 81 nI sxrrrbt, UULivr r III, eal WILIN ara -9.5 1l1r:hlay, ar nl yoo Ibclaoy, reepeatlVoly. Thio tloVClopmcnt vAu maly eXOOod both 'v�nuliW„ul aonJ wuub W Wtivu 1.111 .uI.WIJo 00 01,Wws LiOluw_ 10=1.001.46100Tr1 .,,..... ... ••�, �, iv vvv Lu. I& I n I vn VVI I i U onVV [IV. J7V r. SL gSJ LLt Mr. Stan Sawa August 30, 2006 Page 2 To estimate operational air quality emissions of nitrogen oxide, information from the SCAQMD web site (www.aamd.00v) shows that for a 2008 operational year, only 2000 automobiles each driving an average of 15 miles to and from the development will result in over 55 Ibs of emissions of oxides of nitrogen. For construction emissions, a typical tractor used in construction has a horsepower rating above 500 hP. If the tractor were compliant with the 2004 emissions standards of 4.8 g/bhp-hr, and were operating at 65% load for eight hours, it would emit (50014.8*0.65/454) over 21 Ibs per day of oxides of nitrogen. If the construction site had only four construction vehicle's of comparable size, it would result In more than 100 lbs of oxides of nitrogen emissions, which is the significance threshold under the SCAQMD guidellnes. If older or large equipment were used, the emissions would be substantially higher. This is consistent with information provided in the SCAQMD web site, and would result in a significant impact for construction. An EIR must be prepared to document this and analyze alternatives. ' 3) Traffic. The development is Intended to be a destination for many individuals. The additional traffic on the freeway Interchanges and local intersections must be analyzed to show that no Level of Service (LOS) degradation is anticipated. Such a study must be a part of the environmental review. 4) Visual Resources. The development will have rides and other types of construction that will be visible from off -site. The impact on visual resources must be evaluated so that the environmental impacts are understood. Based on the information available, this development will have significant impacts on visual resources. Should you have any questions, I would be more than pleased to discuss this with you. cc: Indicated on email ioxa,.00i.4e1osa-1 Si ly, William K Coblentz Page 1 of 3 MAYOR ADOLPH, COUNCIL, WHERE ON OBREGON, WILL THE COMMERCIAL LOADING ZONE TO SERVICE THE WATER PARK AND SIGNATURE POOL,BE LOCATED?. WTHOUT A LOADING ZONE HOW WILL THE NEEDS OF A RESTUARNT, BAR, FUCTION TERRACE, SPA, GAME ROOM, FIRST AID CENTER, DINNING TERRACE, EXISTING TENNIS COURTS, TENNIS CLUB HOUSE, FITNESS CENTER, POOLS, LAZY RIVER, PRIVATE CABANAS, BUILDING MAINTANCE, EQUIPMENT MAINTANCE, PLUS, FUCTION TABLES, CHAIRS, FOOD, TOWELS AND PAPER GOODS THAT WILL BE NECESSARY TO SERVICE 1,800 PEOPLE (THE LIST IS ENDLESS) BE TRANSPORTED?. HOW WILL THIS EFFECT TRAFFIC?. OH AND THE OTHER THOUSAND PEOPLE FOR THE SIGNATURE POOL?. THE ENVIROMENTAL INPACT OF PAVING OVER 90% OF THE 4.7 ACRE PROJECT IS SO SIGNIFICANT THAT A NEW STORM DRAIN WILL BE NEEDED. IT IS SHOWN ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-865. HOW WILL REDIRECTING THIS WATER EFFECT THE ENVIRONMENT?. WHERE WILL THE WATER GO?. WILL CALLE MAZATLAN BE TORN UP TO ALLOW FOR THIS NEW STROM DRAIN?. JUST WHERE ARE 1.5 MILLION GALLONS OF WATER GOING TO BE DEPOSITED? HOW ARE THE CHEMICALS AND WASTED GOING TO BE SEPARATED? ARE WE JUST GOING TO DEPOSIT THEM INTO THE GROUND AND ATMOSPHERE? THE REFERENCED SITE PLANS TO SCALE OBTAINED FROM ENGINEERING DO NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION SO HOW IN THE WORLD CAN WE MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENT I LIVE IN? WHAT EFFECT WILL THE TRANSFORMERS, BACK WASH CHAMBERS AND THE 15,000. GALLON SEPTIC TANK HAVE ON THE EXISTING RESIDENTAL BUILDING TO THE WEST?. ARE THERE CANCER CAUSING PROBLEMS LIVING NEXT TO A TRANSFORMER? HAS THIS HEALTH ISSUE BEEN ADRESSED? WE ALL KNOW THE EFFECTS OF FLASH FLOODS WITH 90% OF THE PROJECT PAVED HOW WILL THIS AREA AND SURROUNDING HOMES BE EFFECTED?.JUST WHERE IS THAT ONE POINT FIVE MILLION GALLONS OF UNTREATED WATER GOING? 1 SEE NO TERTIARY TREATMENT FACILITY ON THE PLANS? WHAT EFFECT WILL THE EXTENSIVE LIGHTING HAVE ON THE NIGHT SKY PROVISIONS THE CITY HAS ADOPTED ?.WHERE IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION IS LIGHT POLLUTION, OR VEHICLE EMISSIONS AND CO EMISSIONS ADDRESSED? BY THE WAY WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF WATER OR DO WE HAVE AN INFINITE AMOUNT AND NEED NOT BE CONCERNED OR ARE WE BORROWING WATER? IS WATER RATIONING IN THE FUTURE? THE LAST EIR IN 1974 ON PAGE 102 SAYS IT IS OKAY UNTIL 1990 AND IT IS NOW 2007? WHY HAS THIS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED? SOMEONE ASKED IS THIS OKAY WITH CVWD AND THERE WAS A MUMBLED NON RESPNSIVE ANSWER,BESIDES THEY SELL WATER FOR A PROFIT. WHERE IS THE NEUTRAL IMPACT WATER ANALYSIS AS TO OUR SOURCES OF WATER AND THE IMPACT THIS WILL HAVE? WITH FERNANDO AND OBREGON ALREADY OVER BURDENED, CARS TRAVELING TO THE WATER PARK WILL BE REROUTED BACK DOWN THESE ROADS TO BE RETURNED BY SHUTTLE, DOUBLING THE NUMBER OF TRIPS MADE DOWN THESE OVER BURDENED ROADS. WHAT EFFECT WILL THIS HAVE ON TRAFFIC AND SAFTY?.COUNTING CARS IS NOT A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY? THERE HAS BEEN NO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY? IN FACT THERE HAVE BEEN NO STUDIES AT ALL EXCEPT FOR A NOISE CONSULTANT HIRED BY THE RESORT WHO LIED ABOUT LEQS, AND LIED ABOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT. DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE KIDS YELL"MARCO POLO" IN "SLIGHTLY ELEVATED VOICE." THERE ARE A MILLION THINGS WE HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD AND WE ARE ENTITLED TO TRUE ANSWERS. DO YOU NOT THINK THAT THIRTY THREE YEARS IS A BIT LONG SINCE ANY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WAS DONE IN -EVE AREA, WHICH DID NOT EVEN ADDRESS THE AREA WHERE THIS NEW RADICALLY DIFFERENT USE IS BEING PROPOSED? HAVE THE EFFECTS OF IDLING CARS LINED UP IN THE SUMMER AND THE POLLUTION IMPACT EVEN BEEN ADDRESSED? IN THE 1997 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A DIFFERENT AREA THE 1975 EIR WAS CITED NINE Sunday, March 18, 2007 America Online: Heirgood Page 2 of 3 DIFFERENT TIMES. ON PAGE 102 IN 1975 AIR QUALITY WAS A CRITICAL ISSUE AND IT HAS NOT EVEN BEEN ADDRESSED? DO YOU REALLY THINK TWO THOUSAND PEOPLE INCLUDING TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY FROM LEGACY VILLAS AND GOD KNOWS HOW MANY FROM POINT HAPPY RANCH ETC. ARE GOING TO WALK? IF THE AIR QUALITY WAS CRITICAL IN 1975 DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE IT HAS GOTTEN SO MUCH BETTER AS THE TOWN EXPANDED FROM 1400 TO APPROXIMATELY THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND, NOT INCLUDING ALL THE VISITORS? WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON CHILDREN AND THE HEALTH OF ELDERLY PEOPLE IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD? WE DO NOT KNOW BECAUSE NO ONE HAS ADDRESSED THIS ISSUE AND THIS ISSUE HAS ENORMOUS ENVIRONEMENTAL IMPACT IMPLICATIONS. MANY PEOPLE CURRENTLY WALK FROM SANTA ROSA COVE, THE ENCLAVE AND THE MOUNTIAN ESTATES TO THE TENNIS CLUB. WHEN THE AREA IS COMPLETELY FENCED IN WILL SIDE WALKS BE BUILT ALONG ALL THESE STREET TO ENSURE SAFE TRAVEL TO THE MAIN ENTRANCE ON OBERGON?. IF SO WHERE ARE THEY GOING OR IS THE STREET GOING TO REMAIN THE MODE OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS? IS THIS SAFE? WHY HAS THIS ISSUE NOT BEEN TRULY ADDRESSED AS NOWHERE DO I SEE SIDEWALKS ON FERNANDO. YOU CANNOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS UNSAFE WALKING CONDITIONS OR TOO MANY VEHICLES; AND WHAT ABOUT THE TRUCKS AND THE NOISE AND THE DIESEL FUMES? WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON THE LOCAL COMMUNITY? WE CANNOT ANSWER ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY ADDRESSED. YOU HAVE A DUTY TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PEOPLE BEING EFFECTED AND THE LITTLE CHILDREN AND THEIR HEALTH AND SAFETY HAVE SIMPLY BEEN OVERLOOKED. WHERE WILL THE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF CHEMICALS THAT WILL BE REQUIRED TO TREAT THE WATER BE STORED?. WHAT PROVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THE ENVIROMENT IS PROTECTED FROM THESE CHEMICALS?. THE PLANS DO NOT ADRESS ANY OF THESE ISSUES DEALING WITH WASTE TREATMENT DISPOSAL OR IMAPACT ON OUR LOCAL SERVICES NOR DOES THE FOUNDATION EIR WHICH DID NOT EVEN REMOTELY CONTEMPLATE THIS TYPE OF BRAND NEW LAND USE ON LAND THAT WAS EXCLUDED FROM THE 1975 EIRI WILL THE RATE OF EVAPORATION OVER SO LARGE AN AREA OF WATER CHANGE OUR ATMOSEHERE?. WILL CHEMICALS BE RELEASED INTO THE AIR?.WHAT WILL THE EFFECT OF MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF HUMIDITY BE ON OUR LAST HISTORICAL RESOURCE, THE MORGAN HOUSE? HAS THIS RESOURCE AND THE IMPACT ON IT EVEN BEEN ADRESSED? WILL ANYONE EVEN REALLY BE ABLE TO SEE IT AND ITS ARCHITECTURE WITH A BIG FENCE AROUND IT? IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE A QUARTER OF IT IS BEING DESTROYED FOR LOUNGE CHAIRS? IS THIS THE WAY WE PROTECT LIMITED HISTORICAL RESOURCES OR DO WE JUST IGNORE THE RESOURCE AND THE SIGNIFICANT DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS ON THE RESOURCE IN ORDER TO ACCOMODATE MORE CONCRETE AND LOUNGE CHAIRS. HAS THE ACOUSTIC EFFECT OF PAVING OVER 90% OF THE SITE AREA BEEN STUDIED?. THERE IS A GREAT DIFFERENCE IN HOW SOUND REACTS OVER A HARD SURFACE VERSUS GRASS. HOW SOUND REACTS FROM AN ELEVATED AREA VERSUS AT GROUND LEVEL AND HOW SOUND TRAVELS OVER WATER. THIS NEW PEOJECT WILL BE VERY DIFFERENT THAN THE EXISTING SITE AND SHOULD BE STUDIED AS IT WILL BE ,NOT AS IT IS. BUT THES ISSUES AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE ALSO BEEN IGNORED. LOOK AT THE REAL PLANS. THOSE PRETTY PICTURES ARE JUST THAT AS IT IS ALL CONCRETE WITH BOXED PLANTERS ON TOP OF THE CONCRETE WITH A TINY LIMITED PLANTING AREA. WHAT IS THE TRUE IMPARTIAL IMPACT? WE ALREADY KNOW THAT THEIR PAID CONSULTANT LIED. WHO IS PROTECTING THE PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ALL THESE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES? WITH SO MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS AND AN OUTDATED FOUNDATION EIR THAT EXCLUDED THIS PROPOSED NEW AND RADICAL LAND USE, THE PROJECT SHOULD BE DENIED. AT A MINIMUM A NEW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED. EVEN IF YOU FAVOR THE DEVELOPER PLEASE REQUIRE AN EIR AS THE TOTAL IMPACT ON OUR ENVIRONMENT HAS NOT BEEN Sunday, March 18, 2007 America Online: Heirgood rage j of ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED AND THE RAMIFICATIONS AND LONG TERM DANGERS ARE TOO IMPORTANT NOT TO REQUIRE THE REFERENCED EIR. SINCERELY, LESLIE FREDERICKS Sunday, March 18, 2007 America Online: Heirgood March 19, 2007 Dear Council Member: RECEIVED 2007 MR 19 pM 4 01 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 1 am writing this letter to summarize my feelings about the proposed water park at the La Quinta Resort and Hotel. From attending Plan Commission and City Council meetings, it is my understanding that the Plan Commission staff is recommending approval of the project subject to various conditions. It is my further understanding that the staff has concluded the environmental impact report ("EIR") prepared in 1975 adequately addresses environmental issues related to the project and that the project proposes no environmental problems. Simple common sense dictates that there have been enormous changes in La Quinta over the last thirty-two years. The population of La Quinta has grown from 1400 people to over 35,000 people during this time period with all manner of resulting congestion. With regard to the specific site, we currently are faced with an extremely dangerous traffic situation on Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon. To further burden this area with a water park, which will draw hundreds of additional guests is simply irresponsible planning. At a minimum, the City Council owes it to the citizens of La Quinta to demand a new EIR to examine the issues of traffic, parking, noise, air pollution, stone sewer discharges, ground water conservation and other related issues which impact the health and safety of the residents living in the general vicinity of the La Quinta Resort and Hotel. By failing to require a new environmental assessment of such a significant project would be highly irresponsible. I strongly urge you, as the elected caretakers of our City, to insist on a new environmental impact report related to this project. Very truly yours, / KEN KE-9 ?EAr AVENIDA FERNANDO -099�.6 prc Imo. -' rVISTA BONITA CALL@ MAZATLAN RESORT ENTRANCE _ t To FWASNINGTON ST. F NIGNWAY In INTEESTATE TO F i 3 0 s -� «vim TO am GOLF COURSE ®LNI.EON. J covEUTI (t� To VILLAGE OF u QUINTA 1 i asap i vi i Gentlemen, My name is Mary Jane O'Connor. I own the Tennis Villa at 77343 Fernando. I am writing this to reconfirm my speech to the Planning Commission on March 13th, 2007 and to reconfirm that it is a part of the public record. I am asking that you decline this petition by CNL Corp. in the interest of the LaQuinta Hotel. I had spoken to the Planning Commission regarding my concern as to the location of the "lazy river' which as I understand from the information submitted was within 14 feet of the tennis villa walls. It is also to be 6 feet below grade. As LaQuinta is a former sea bed and of sand and not of granite as the rest of the western valley, and because we are certainly in earthquake territory, I think this is absolutely foolhardy. As all of you are aware, most homes here have some sort of cracking in the walls. Because in time, this may surely happen to the concrete base of the "lazy river', there will be seepage which could undermine our structures and, at the very least, cause damage to our walls and patios. When I spoke about this, the Planning Commission said they would have to talk to the attorney for the city and , then, without any further investigation, passed the proposal. I believe that this proposal should be declined and at the very least, it should be a conditional approval with a SIGNIFICANT INSURANCE POLICY to mitigate damages to the contiguous tennis villas for the future. There is some communication between CNL and the owners of the contiguous villas. I would ask should you not decline the entire petition, that there would be a conditional approval based upon the acceptance of a fair market value by the homeowners of any potential offer submitted by CNL. As our city fathers, it is your duty to protect ALL constituents and taxpayers. Thank you. Mary Jane O'Connor Navcon 701 W. Las Palmas Dr., Fullerton, CA 92835 INEngineering Phone 714.441.3488 ; Fax 714.441.3487 Network webinfo@navcon.com ; www.navcon.com Noise & Vibration Consultants 20-March-07 Attention: Ms. Marie Mack Guralnick & Gilliland, LLP 74-399 Highway 111, Suite M Palm Desert, CA 92260 USA Ph. 760-340-1515; E-mail mariem .pphoalaw.com Subject: Navcon Project No. 71734 La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Project, City Council Meeting - Notes Reference: 1. Telecom, Hans Forschner & Jim Steadman — Marie Mack, 3-20-07 2. Telecom, Hans Forschner & Jim Steedman — Les Johnson, Stan Sawa, 3-20-07 3. EDSA, La Quinta Signature Pool, submitted to the City of La Quinta, Planning Department, dated February 2, 2007 4. Veneklasen Report, dated January 8, 2007 5. Wieland Associates Project File 897-07, dated February 12, 2007 6. Veneklasen Report, Attachment 11 dated February 15, 2007 Dear Marie, It is our understanding that the La Quinta Resort has or will be issued a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the Signature Pool Project. We reviewed the Planning Commission Staff Report, specifically in regards to the potential noise impact and have grave concerns about this situation. Based upon our noise analysis and our review of the Veneklasen & Wieland Associates reports, it is our opinion that the Signature Pool Project represents a significant noise impact to the residential community located along the North property line. At this point I would recommend that you request the City Council to table the CUP La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Project until the Applicant provides a detailed plan for mitigating the potential noise impact. This is a critical issue because we believe that the noise impact is significant and we do not believe that it will be possible to mitigate the impact after the fact. Navcon Proposal No. 71734, Letter for City Council Meeting Page 1 of 3 Navcon 701 W. Las Palmas Dr., Fullerton, CA 92835 Engineering Phone 714.441.3488 ; Fax 714.441.3487 Network webinfo@navcon.com ; www.navcon.com Noise & Vibration Consultants Some of the principal issues we have with the Applicant's noise consultant's assessment are as follows: ➢ [Refer to Veneklasen Report, dated January 8, 2007, Page 8] Veneklasen did not apply the 5 dB penalty for speech although their report states that the principal noise source is "noise from human sources", i.e., speech, screaming, etc. o The City requirement is L50 = 60 dBA without the speech penalty. o The City requirement is L50 v 55 dBA with the speech penalty. ➢ [Refer to Veneklasen Report, dated January 8, 2007, Page 8, Table 6] Veneklasen predicted Lye = 58 dBA at two locations. These predictions exceed the L50 = 55 dBA limit. ➢ Upon reviewing the Veneklasen Report, Attachment 11 dated February 15, 2007, we believe that Veneklasen made a serious error in their noise predictions which resulted in an underestimation of the noise impact. They concentrated all of the sound power emission, "total vocal content" at the center of the total area of usage [Page 3, Item 6] when in fact the noise is distributed over a large area. In other words, they considered the noise to be a point source. We consider the noise to be more of an area source which is how we modeled the situation. Our predictions are higher and more closely resemble the real world situation. ➢ Veneklasen did not address the Lma, level requirement in their assessment. This is a critical issue for a facility such as the Signature Pool Project where kids will be screaming. o The City requirement is Lma, = 80 dBA without the speech penalty o The City requirement is Lma, = 75 dBA with the speech penalty. Again, the principal noise source is screaming "speech" and therefore the 5 dB penalty should be applied. ➢ In our measurement survey conducted 18-Feb-07, we recorded Lma, noise levels of up to 84.1 dBA at the La Quinta Resort/Residential property line. The Lma, levels were generated by children and parents screaming/yelling during a tennis lesson on the La Quinta Resort tennis courts. These levels are approximately 9 dBA higher than the noise ordinance. ➢ The Lma, noise levels generated from the Signature Pool Project will be at least of the same magnitude and more frequent due to the number of kids and adults in the area. ➢ The planned usage of the Signature Pool Project during the evening hours from 6 pm to 10 pm was not addressed in the Applicant's Noise Assessment. The usage of the Signature Pool Navcon Proposal No. 71734, Letter for City Council Meeting Page 2 of 3 .- i.-m-, Naveon 701 W. Las Palmas Dr., Fullerton, CA 82836 Engineering Phone 714.441.3488 ; Fax 714.441.3487 Network webinfo@navcon.com ; www.navcon.com Noise & Vibration Consultants Project for Hotel functions of up to 1,500 people until 10:00 P.M. will extend the Community noise impact. ➢ The CUP notes that the applicant "will temporarily shutdown operation of the active water features (wave pool, slices and lazy river) if the City notifies them that the City's Noise Ordinance maximums are exceeded". The Veneklasen report does not address any mitigation options that would significantly reduce the community noise impact. We do not believe that it will be possible to significantly mitigate the impact due to close proximity of the residential housing to the Signature Pool Project. In summary, it is our professional opinion that the noise impact from Signature Pool Project will not be in compliance with City of La Quinta noise ordinance. Please feel free to contact my associate, Jim Steedman or me if you have any questions. Reg s, Hans Forschner Sr. Acoustical Specialist Navcon Proposal No. 71734, Letter for City Council Meeting Page 3 of 3 DATE: CASE NO: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: REQUEST: 1159117`➢GLOB ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USES: BACKGROUND: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 22, 2007 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-862 HIGHLAND LA QUINTA, LLC KKE ARCHITECTS (MARK GILES) CUMMINGS CURLEY AND ASSOCCIATES, LLC REVIEW OF DRIVE-THRU LANE SCREENING FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN PHASE 2 OF THE DUNES BUSINESS PARK NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, BETWEEN JEFFERSON STREET AND DUNE PALMS ROAD IN THE DUNES BUSINESS PARK CR (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) NORTH: FP / FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL SOUTH: CR'/ RETAIL CENTER EAST: CR / RETAIL CENTER WEST: CR/VACANT The total project site is approximately 6.38 acres and located immediately west of the shopping center that houses Jack-in-the-box, Smart and Final, 99 Cents Store, and other retail users (Attachment 1). The first phase (SDP2005-553) of the project was approved in June, 2005 with 36,000 square feet of floor space in one inline structure near the north property line. Construction of the first phase is nearing completion. Phase 2 construction has not yet begun. Phase 2 (SDP 2006-863) consist of three freestanding buildings near Highway 111 and was approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2006. In an effort to screen the drive-thru lanes and comply with applicable Conditions of Approval, the applicant proposes to use a screen wall with some berming and heavy planting. P:\Reports - PC\2007\5-22-07\sdp 2006-862 pc rpt drive thru.docive thru.doc Condition of approval #53 requires that the drive-thru lane screening provisions be approved by the Planning Commission. Additionally, Condition of approval #54E requires the top of the screen wall be 5' above the drive-thru lane surface. Lastly, Condition of approval #54D requires the screen wall extend along the driveway entry on the west side of building 1 for one-third of the lanes length. The applicant has submitted plans to show the required screening provisions. PROJECT PROPOSAL AND DISCUSSION: Buildings 1 and 2, the two westerly buildings have individual drive-thru lanes that wrap around the buildings adjacent to Highway 111. Both buildings can be multi -or single tenant, with the drive-thru lane used by the easterly most tenant of each building. Building 2 may be a single tenant user. In addition to the planting plan, the applicant has submitted a cross section through each building showing how the screening will be provided. Each section shows the building, drive-thru lane, screen wall, berming, planting concept, Highway 111 and finish grades. The wall will be curvilinear with one opening near the east end for pedestrian access to the street from the center. The screen wall will be constructed of tan split face block with a precision block cap. The wall will be 5' in height with one to two feet of berming provided against it on the street side of the wall to decrease the mass of the wall when viewed from the street. Planting and groundcover will be provided on both sides of the wall. ANALYSIS: The submitted plans show 5' of screening height is to be provided by the screen wall and berming. The wall extends along approximately half of the west side of Building 1 to screen from view of the driveway entry as required. Additionally, shrubs and trees will be provided for additional screening. The wall and berm screening as required by the Site Development Permit approval has been provided. Upon the Planning Commissions approval, staff will forward the complete final irrigation and planting plans to the Architecture and Landscaping Committee for their review, after which the Community Development Director will consider the plans for final approval. Staff will verify that the Coachella Valley Water District and Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner has approved the plans before our final approval. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 2007- approving the drive-thru screening with the following conditions: PAReports - PC\2007\5-22-07\sdp 2006-862 pc rpt drive thru.docive thru.doc s 1. The north end of the screen wall along the west driveway shall step down to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 2. The screen wall along the west driveway shall be installed in a manner that will allow the planting of the trees shown on the on -site landscaping plan to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Attachments: 1 . Location map 2. Screening and planting plans Prepared by: Stan Sawa, Principal Planner P:\Reports - PC\2007\5-22-07\sdp 2006-862 pc rpt drive thru.docive thru.doc March 20, 2007 Mr. Douglas R. Evans Director Community Development Department City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 ?Gc% rill ZO`a upta.CaRfonsia )S6e-2747 ' CITY OF LA QUINTA Cl Y CLE,""S OFFICE Re. Environmental Assessment 2006-573 and Site Development Permit 2006-865 Dear Mr. Evans: My wife and I live at 77-600 Avenida Fernando in La Quinta, directly across the street from the conference facilities and parking lot of the La Quinta Resort and Club (the "Resort'). In connection with the water park proposed by the Resort we had a chance to review the traffic impact analysis prepared by Endo Engineering (the "Endo Reports"). We found such report to be sweeping in its scope for a traffic analysis: describing the reason why the hotel is successful, explaining why the Resort must pursue new recreational amenities that will appeal to a wider demographic and how the project will permit the resort to more fully utilize a higher percentage of its vested entitlements. After reading all this in just the first paragraph you may understand why we didn't think this sounded like an objective report from a disinterested third -party consultant. However, the integrity of the report was completely undermined by the statement addressing the impact of employee parking: it "may also incrementally increase the number of shuttle trips to and from the resort from the remote lot. These increases are not considered significant, since substantially larger seasonal variations in the resort staffing currently go unnoticed by surrounding residents ..." It is presumptuous for Endo Engineering to speak on our behalf and it should be abundantly clear by now that nothing the Resort does goes unnoticed. For the record, no one ever talked to my wife and I about this matter, not our neighbor, Steve Davis, nor Richard and Leslie Fredericks. As a result, we retained the services of a prominent traffic consultant, Meyer Mohaddes Associates, and asked them to perform a peer review of the Endo Reports. Mr. Doug R Evans March 20, 2007 Page 2 Enclosed is a memorandum to my attention dated, March 19, 2007, from Meyer Mohaddes which describes the Endo Reports as containing "a significant number of generalities and statements that are (a) unrelated to traffic and parking, or (b) not substantiated by any analysis or data. In essence the Endo Reports are glib in its assessements and lack sufficient evaluation to be relied upon for a project with the potential to have such a substantial impact. We would encourage you to review the enclosed memorandum and hope you agree that a comprehensive traffic and parking analysis for this entire neighborhood should be conducted to determine the best way to solve the existing problems and honestly assess the impact of a water park. Should you have any questions about this matter please feel free to call. Xilliarely,m L. Puget WLP/bp encl. cc: Mayor Donald Adolph Mayor Pro Tem Stanley Sniff Councilwoman Terry Henderson Councilman Tom Kirk Councilman Lee Osborn Mohaddes Associates a business unit of Iteds, Inc. MEMORANDUM TO: William L. Puget FROM: Robert K. Olson, Senior Transportation Engineer COPY: Gary J. Hamrick, Principal DATE: March 19, 2007 SUBJECT: Results of the Peer Review of the Traffic Report for the La Quinta Resort Environmental Assessment 2006-573 and Additional Data Collection. This memorandum summarizes our findings and questions from a review of the traffic reports Performed for the La Quinta Resort's Environmental Assessment 2006-573 ("Environmental Assessment") prepared by Endo Engineering, dated January 8, 2007 (together, the "Traffic Report,,). The first section of this and February 1 n ntal memo summarizes our review of the Traffic Report and identifies a number of concerns regarding the data and conclusions in the Traffic Report. The second section of this memo provides a summary of the findings and observations from a separate data collection effort conducted by Meyer Mohaddes Associates ("MMA") for traffic counts along Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon for comparison to the counts provided in the Traffic Report. Traffic Study Review In general, the Traffic Report prepared for the Environmental Assessment contains a significant number of generalities and statements that are either (a) unrelated to the traffic and Parking, or (b) are not substantiated by any analysis or data. It fails to adequately quantify existing traffic and parking challenges that currently exist. And the mitigation measues proposed in the Traffic Study are measures that either are not currently being enforced at the Resort or would not provide adequate solutions to the overall problems related to traffic and parking. In particular, there are a number of specific shortcomings with the Traffic Study including, but not limited to the following: Traffic • The Traffic Report states that since this feature would be open to mainly guests, increases in guest bookings would not increase traffic above the peak occupancy for the 400 Oceangate. Suite 480, Long Be3eh. CA 90802 • plruf1a- (562) 432-8484 • Fe,r (562) 432-8485 • wwvv iter7s Gown William L. Puget March 19, 2007 Page 2 of 8 hotel. However, the Traffic Report fails to analyze the uses and the water park different nature of the existing Families taking their chilin terms of traffic generation in the area of the attraction. in to a water park are more likely to want to drive since they are taking towels, toys, extra clothes, etc. TrafficThus, contrary to the conclusions of the Report, the demand upon Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon could be much different than assumed. Access to the facilities is also available to the friends and family of the club members. The number of these memberships can increase. While the report states that friends of the members would not be allowed to use the pool unless they too were club members, it does not state how the facility would distinguish between family and friends of members to allow or not allow access to the pool. The__ end result is that any increase in the club membership will likely result in an increase in traffic volumes to/from the Resort and will increase traffic along Avenida Fernando and will increase traffic along any portion of Avenida Obregon where club members are allowed to operate vehicles. Since the water feature will be open year round, including weekends and holidays during the peak season, this will increase traffic during periods when the Resort is already at it highest activity levels. • The construction -related impacts are underemphasized in the report and no meaningful analysis i presented to justify the conclusions in the Traffic Report. Since Avenida Fernando is the primary access for several of the residential areas adjacent to the Resort and is also a primary hotel access, the addition of construction traffic along this street is significant. The report states that construction staging will take place in the palm grove parcel at the corner of Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon and that if additional staging area is need it will be provided "at a different location". The report does not, however, state where this will occur and since all of the Resort property is occupied with other uses it is not likely that it could occur on site without displacing other activities. The possibility for overflow construction staging is indicated, but no contingency plan to accommodate the overflow was presented in the report. In addition additional construction traffic along Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon. to being unspecified in location, any overflow construction staging could result in • With the gate that is installed at the southern end of Avenida Obregon, Avenida Fernando and the northern end of Avenida Obregon are primary access routes for moving traffic into and out of the Resort and the surrounding residential areas. The Traffic Report states that both of these streets are operating well within their capacities and any traffic addition from the pool facility would not cause an impact. However, the report does not state what that "capacity" is or provide any analysis towards determining what the capacity is. The role and operation of Avenida Fernando is already somewhat in conflict as the street functions both as local access street and collector street. William L. Puget March 19, 2007 Page 3 of 8 The capacities of streets that serve a local -access function are not typically measured in terms of their physical capacity as the Traffic Report suggests, but rather in terms of their "environmental" capacity. The environmental capacity is defined as the capacity that is acceptable without creating an impact on that particular street. "Acceptability" and "Impact" depend on many factors such as single family versus multi -family, density, proximity of homes to the street, driveways or alley access, street width, presence of schools or not, the perception of the residents and other variables. The Traffic Report takes into account none of these variables and as such the observation that "access roadways are currently operating at a fraction of their total capacity" is unsupported by any facts or analysis. • With the narrow width of Avenida Obregon—a ing a centerline stripe as proposed in the report would do nothing to improve conditions on the street and the proposed entry gate and island will not provide any additional capacity. The current width of Avenida Obregon at 24 feet is less than the City's minimum standard width of 36 feet for a local street. Adding traffic to this narrow street, which serves as both a street for auto access and a walkway for guests and staff is not desirable and should be avoided if possible. • The plan for the entry gate/drop off area does not appear to be properly designed to allow simultaneous loading/unloading along the curb and movement of through traffic along the street or allow for easy turning around of stopped vehicles. Therefore, it would not adequately address the issue of managing pick-up and drop off traffic. Typically drop off areas are designed to be off of the street or in cut out areas along the side of the street. This one is designed to have people stop on the street and block traffic while loading/unloading. If it takes several minutes to load people after a day at the pool, traffic can easily stack, backing onto Avenida Fernando obstructing traffic movement along both streets. • The additional activity from delivery trucks is glossed over by stating that they will be dropping off chemicals during off-peak times. It does not indicate whether the trucks would be dropping off supplies at the pool facility or would be using the hotel's loading dock. The proposed entry gate and the limited width of the street would restrict truck access to Avenida Obregon as it would not allow for U-turns by larger trucks and large truck staging would significantly block at least one through lane. These conditions could result in trucks parking along Avenida Fernando to unload pool supplies. If the plan is to use the existing loading dock for the hotel, it will serve to make a poor situation worse due to the challenges described in the following paragraph. • The existing loading dock for the hotel, which is accessed from Avenida Fernando, causes significant problems when trucks are entering and leaving the dock. The width of Avenida Fernando (36 feet) makes it difficult for large tractor -trailer trucks to move William L. Puget March 19, 2007 Page 4 of 8 into and out of the driveway near the dock. This results in trucks having to make multiple maneuvers to get to and from the dock. During this time, traffic is blocked along Avenida Fernando and cars stack on the street waiting for the truck to clear. In addition, when multiple trucks are present, trucks queue along the curb and further obstruct traffic on the street. The addition of more truck traffic to this congested area will worsen this existing problem. • According to the City's standard for private streets (13.24.070), the minimum width for a local street is 36 to 40 feet, while the minimum width for a collector street is 40 to 50 feet. The eastern portion of Avenida Fernando is the primary entrance to all the improvements and amenities along the northerly and westerly edges of the Resort and operas as a collector street and should be designed accordingly; 40 to 50 feet compared to the existing 36-foot width. The current limited width does not adequately accommodate even the existing traffic demand as evidenced by the blocking of the street by trucks. Adding traffic to this section of the street will only aggravate the problems experienced along this section of Avenida Fernando. Parking • The Traffic Report discusses parking supply and demand for the Resort within the context of the facility as a whole. However, much of the Resort's parking is provided in small lots and groups of spaces spread out around the facility. Counting unused spaces on the opposite side of the Resort as part of the supply to serve the proposed pool facility is not appropriate for assessing available parking. The report notes that people currently park illegally on Avenida Obregon rather than park a few hundred feet away because they want convenient parking. That is predictable human nature. The Traffic Report states that patrons can use these spaces that over a thousand feet away from the facility in the future. Even if a path is clearly marked to and from the pool, there is no evidence to suggest that traffic would operate in such a manner, particularly during the uncomfortable temperatures of the summer months. The remote spaces on the Resort property, even though under common ownership, should not be considered as part of the available parking supply unless the Resort is planning to serve these spaces continuously and frequently with shuttle service to reasonable access to the pool for patrons parking there. As noted earlier, many of these patrons will be carrying articles for the day with them and may be older or accompanied by small children. These patrons will have little incentive to wait for and then ride a shuttle to/from the pool from remote parking areas. • The report states that some parking spaces may need to be relocated; however, the drawing for the entry gate feature clearly shows that 12 parking spaces will be removed. And, no discussion is provided about where those spaces would be provided once removed from Avenida Obregon. Parking capacity at this location at the Resort is William L. Puget March 19, 2007 Page 5 of 8 already at a premium; any mitigation measures contemplated should note the problem of parking capacity in this area and seek to expand it rather than decrease it, as proposed. • The Resort does not manage the parking problems along Avenida Obregon today and would likely have little incentive in the future to do so. Indeed, the Resort has a conflict of interest, as it does not want to ticket patrons for parking so as not to alienate them. The facility clearly does not have enough parking along Avenida Obregon to accommodate the existing parking demand for the resort guests as evidenced by the photos provided for our review and our field observations. Shuttling guests into and out of the guest facilities in addition to the proposed pool will require additional staff and equipment to accomplish. In addition, ticketing patrons would require bringing City police onto the site. Lessons learned by patrons would be wasted because of the temporary nature of the patrons that would be cited. Therefore little change in behavior would be expected and not much improvement in the condition would be anticipated. Therefore, ticketing vehicles along the street does not appear to be a workable solution to the problem. • An option listed in the study for management of the parking supply along Avenida Obregon is to post signs stating that parking is by "permit only". Photos and observations show that people currently do not obey the posted parking restrictions along the red curbing that states that sates "no parking any time". Without physically limiting cars to access the street and towing of illegally parked vehicles and equipment, what would make people obey a permit -only parking restriction? The suggested posting of the parking as permit only would likely be ineffective in addressing the parking problems in along Avenida Obregon without continuous enforcement by the Resort, which so far it has proven to not support. Therefore this mitigation measure would not appear to be an effective solution to the problem. • A solution to the parking shortage along Avenida Obregon might be to not permit club members to park along this street at any time and only allow limited hotel guest parking, but as a practical matter this may be difficult to implement. In such case all parking for club members would need to be in remote lots and access would be provided by shuttles. However, even in this case, if non -hotel guest pool users were not allowed access to parking along Avenida Obregon or drop off at a new entry gate, what measures would be in place to stop people from stopping and loading/unloading along or parking for short periods along Avenida Fernando? • The report seems to provide no practical solutions to the parking, loading, and unloading problems the proposed project would cause or exacerbate that would not be labor intensive for the Resort to implement and maintain and difficult to enforce at best. Without the expansion of the parking supply at the Resort to accommodate the existing William L. Puget March 19, 2007 Page 6 of 8 shortages and the development of a full-time shuttle program the parking problems in this area of the facility will likely only get worse with the proposed project. o In addition to the issues related to parking of guest vehicles along Avenida Obregon, there is a significant parking concern with staff golf carts and shuttle vehicles. They are routinely seen driving along the streets, parked along red curbed areas, and obstructing traffic. Even if access to guest autos and other vehicles is restricted along Avenida Obregon, provisions for parking and accommodating these vehicles will need to be incorporated into any design plan for the Resort. The Traffic Report simply states that more of these vehicles would be used, but does not mention or address the current and future problems of how these vehicles would be accommodated. o It is our understanding that, periodically, the Resort has special events that remove a significant portion of the existing parking supply on the east side of the Resort's ballroom to erect tents or store other event equipment. The temporary parking losses caused during these special events compounds the existing parking shortage at the Resort. The Traffic Report does not address the impact of this displaced parking which might otherwise be needed to accommodate pool patrons. Supplemental Data Collection Traffic counts were conducted for MMA by Counts Unlimited (the same firm that conducted the counts in February) on Friday and Saturday, March 9ih and 10th along Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon. The counts consisted of machines continuously collecting traffic data during the two-day period and manual classification counts conducted during three, two-hour periods during the two days. The classification counts were conducted both as a check for the machine counters and to determine the mix of traffic that operates on the streets during the day. The manual counts were conducted approximately between 7AM and 9AM and 4PM and 6PM on Friday, and between noon and 2PM on Saturday. Counters were placed at four locations. The first located about 50 feet south of the Spa entrance on Avenida Obregon. The second was located about 50 south of the intersection of Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando. The third counter was located west of the intersection of Avenida Fernando and Eisenhower Drive. The fourth was located west of the Davis residence driveway on Avenida Fernando. Summaries of the traffic count data are included in the attached Appendix. The data showed that Avenida Fernando carried approximately 4,800 to 5,100 vehicles per day near the intersection with Eisenhower Drive on the two March count days. West of the Resort driveways the volumes dropped to about 3,200 to 3,550 vehicles per day. Along Avenida Obregon the volumes ranged from 2,273 at the northern end of the street to 1,487 south of the William L. Puget March 19, 2007 Page 7 of 8 spa entrance. The traffic volumes observed during the March count were significantly higher than the volumes from the February 2007 counts presented in the Traffic Study. The differences in the volumes varied from 30 percent higher near Eisenhower Dri Percent more on Avenida Obregon. ve to about 54 As note above, the role and operation of Avenida Fernando appear to be in conflict with each other, at least on the eastern end of the street. While the most recent count volumes indicate that the street is operating as a collector street, but was physically designed to be a local street. Local streets typically do not have traffic volumes that exceed 2,500 to 3,000 vehicles per day and are narrower in width than a collector street. The existing width and the frequent blockages from trucks at the Resort driveways indicate that fh"treet was designed to be a local street. However, since Avenida Fernando provides the primary access for numerous residential units and is a key access for the Resort and the hotel loading area the street should be classified as a collector street. Collector streets are typically a minimum of 40 feet wide and have all truck maneuvering done off-street. In addition, collector streets do not normally accommodate golf cart and other slow moving traffic on a regular basis as Avenida Fernando does. Therefore, Avenida Fernando is too narrow for the function it is trying serve and has a mix of traffic that is not conducive to higher volumes and as a result has regular traffic blockages from trucks and conflicts between faster and slower moving traffic. Adding more traffic to this street will worsen this operational condition. Summary The Traffic Report prepared for the Environmental Assessment contains a significant number Of generalities and statements that are either unrelated to the traffic and parking or are not substantiated by any analysis or data. It also fails to adequately quantify the existing traffic and parking issues in the area. Moreover, the traffic counts referred to in the Traffic Report were 30 percent to 54 percent lower than separate traffic counts we conducted. The mitigation measures proposed in the traffic study are measures that either are not currently being enforced at the Resort or would not provide any solution to the overall problems related to traffic and parking, but just shifts them to another location. The Traffic Report states that there will be no impact from the project, yet it proposes mitigation programs "just in case". If such mitigation programs are indeed required, then the designs for those measures need to be adequate to function as they are proposed. The proposed drop off area proposed near the pool would not provide adequate width to accommodate a stopped car and moving traffic simultaneously and would result in blocking traffic along Avenida Obregon with queued vehicles. If this pool facility is to be developed, the Resort needs to solve the parking capacity problem near the Pool feature and create a consistent parking and access program that does not exacerbate the Resort's current parking problems and does not generate additional traffic along Avenida Fernando or Avenida Obregon. Because Avenida Fernando is the primary access for several of the area residential developments along with the Resort, its operation is critical to the fic Report prepared for the convenience and safety of their residents and patrons. The Traf Environmental Assessment does not adequately address the existing problems at the Resort, William L. Puget March 19, 2007 Page 8 of 8 does not define the extent of the traffic and parking to be generated by the proposed project, and does not provide any concrete mitigation measures for addressing the impacts that the project would generate. Puget Memo 3-I9-07.doc Appendix City of La Quinta Avenida Obregon S/ Avenida Fernando 48 Hour Directional Volume Count Start 10-Mar- 07 Northbound Time Sat Mornin Afternoon Morn 12:00 4 27 12:15 1 21 12:30 2 32 12:45 0 23 01:00 1 16 01.15 0 21 01:30 0 10 01,45 0 14 02:00 2 16 02:15 1 16 02:30 0 22 02:45 0 23 03:00 0 17 03:15 0 18 03:30 0 9 03:45 0 27 04:00 1 23 04:15 0 21 04:30 1 20 04:45 0 16 05:00 1 22 05:15 2 19 05:30 1 14 05:45 3 22 06:00 1 21 06:15 4 22 06:30 7 18 06:45 3 24 07:00 10 18 07:15 12 10 07:30 6 10 07:45 11 7 3 08:00 7 5 08:15 17 6 08:30 13 4 08:45 18 7 5 09:00 32 11 09:15 26 1 09:30 22 8 09:45 21 5 10 10:00 18 9 10:15 43 9 10:30 P8 9 10:45 18 8 8 11:00 26 4 11:15 26 3 11:30 19 2 11:45 19 3 90 Total 402 693 402 Combined Total 1095 1 AM Peak 09:00 Vol. 100 P.H.F. 0.781 PM Peak 12,00 Vol. 103 P.H.F. 0.805 Percentag a 36.7% 63.3% ADTIAAD T ADT 2,264 AADT 2,264 Counts Unlimtied, Inc. 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Moreno Valley, CA 92557 (951) 247-6716 Hour Totals Southbound in 15 3 Afternoon Momin Afternoon 2 21 4 9 1 13 7 103 1 19 1 15 0 13 0 24 1 61 0 12 3 28 1 22 0 22 3 77 0 25 0 22 0 17 0 22 0 71 0 23 0 26 0 25 1 26 2 80 1 32 0 26 1 27 1 16 7 77 0 23 1 15 3 16 7 14 85 4 10 10 11 13 12 20 7 9 45 14 6 13 4 20 9 24 15 5 22 22 16 20 5 18 7 21 9 0 25 24 14 26 12 29 12 27 8 35 19 6 24 5 18 3 18 5 12 16 2 693 A 731 095 1159 09:45 106 0.914 04:30 111 0.867 36.9% 63.1% Hour Totals Imo A Page 2 LQOBSFE Site Code: 042113 Date Start: 09-Mar-07 Date End: 10-Mar-07 Combined Totals 8 621 15 165 1 64 2 125 4 97 7 174 0 84 0 155 2 109 4 189 2 92 9 169 15 55 30 140 57 36 96 81 79 44 134 66 83 35 183 60 101 38 184 73 a 131 830 1159 2254 Counts Unlimtied, Inc 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Moreno Valley, CA 92557 Page 1 City of La Quinta (951) 247-6716 LQFEWEI Avenida Fernando Site Code: 042113 W/ Eisenhower Drive Date Start: 09-Mar-07 48 Hour Directional Volume Count Date End: 10-Mar-07 Start 0 -Mar- Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals 07 -------- ------- RA..-....... ewe 1.n.. Aen RA Aen 12:00 8 70 4 48 12:15 4 36 1 28 12.30 5 57 3 46 12.45 2 62 19 225 3 48 11 170 30 395 01:00 1 6o 3 37 01:15 2 68 3 31 01:30 1 47 2 35 01:45 3 41 7 214 2 31 10 134 17 348 02:00 1 56 0 29 02:15 1 52 2 22 02:30 4 45 0 52 0245 1 35 7 188 2 53 4 156 11 344 03:00 1 57 0 40 03:15 0 32 0 28 03:30 0 45 3 33 03:45 4 42 5 176 4 36 7 137 12 313 04:00 2 44 3 55 04:15 2 41 6 48 04:30 3 69 7 47 04:45 4 44 11 198 7 51 23 201 34 399 05:00 3 72 6 42 05:15 18 50 8 42 05:30 13 63 12 42 05:45 10 47 44 232 22 58 48 184 92 416 06:00 6 47 13 37 06:15 11 49 13 36 06:30 14 37 19 24 06:45 13 30 44 163 36 31 81 128 125 291 07:00 18 39 18 20 07:15 17 38 43 16 07:30 25 25 56 17 07:45 28 21 88 123 69 15 186 68 274 191 08:00 29 23 41 12 08.15 45 17 41 6 08:30 23 18 61 18 08:45 22 14 119 72 41 21 184 57 303 129 09:00 36 17 41 15 09:15 32 6 28 19 09:30 41 16 41 22 09:45 47 14 156 53 49 21 159 77 315 130 10:00 41 32 31 34 10:15 48 28 34 22 10:30 41 25 37 24 10:45 38 21 168 106 50 19 152 99 320 205 11:00 44 11 45 11 11:15 45 12 41 7 11:30 47 10 40 6 11:45 60 7 196 40 30 6 156 30 352 70 Total 864 1790 Combined 2654 Total AM Peak 11'00 Vol. 196 P.H F. 0.817 PM Peak 00:30 Vol. 245 P.H.F. 0.851 Pereenlag 32.6% 67.4% e M4 1/Vu luzl 1441 2654 2462 07:45 212 0 768 04:00 201 0.866 41.5% 58.5% luzi 1"i leev aca 2462 5116 City of La Quinta Avenida Fernando W/ Eisenhower Drive 48 Hour Directional V 10-Mar- Counts Unlimtied, Inc. 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Moreno Valley, CA 92557 (951) 247-6716 Start 07 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Time 12:00 Sat Mornin Afternoon Mornin Afternoon Mornin AR rr 12:15 12 45 6 12:30 5 51 5 12:45 01:00 6 58 25 195 4 5 01:15 3 6 48 41 2 01:30 2 41 4 01:45 02:00 3 35 14 165 2 02:15 3 0 2 02:30 2 f4 0 02:45 03:00 1 45 —7 183 2 03:15 1 5 37 43 2 03:30 3 35 1 03:45 04:00 5 46 14 161 2 04:15 2 5 35 47 3 04:30 7 38 7 04:45 05:00 8 63 22 183 7 10 05:16 14 48 8 05:30 13 35 6 05:45 06:00 9 35 40 161 12 10 06:15 7 14 43 53 8 06:30 21 43 12 06:45 07:00 10 42 52 181 19 21 07:15 23 24 44 28 20 07:30 9 27 19 07:45 OB:00 48 19 84 118 33 37 08:15 17 21 18 25 24 08:30 38 14 35 08:45 09:00 29 7 105 64 35 39 1 09:15 40 40 23 18 26 1 09:30 43 23 35 2 10:00 10:15 37 21 160 85 27 35 1 2 10:30 37 P8 29 2 10:45 40 45 44 2 11:00 34 30 149 135 48 36 2 1 11:15 51 16 30 11:30 11A5 37 38 11 24 1 11:45 51 10 7 44 35 E Total Combined 850 1675 850 850 1675 7gg 9 t48i Total 2525 2525 2286 AM Peak 11:00 Vol. 178 10:15 P.H.F. 0.873 148 PM Peak 00: 0.771 Vol. 203 3 04:45 P.H.F. 0.806 201 0.838 Percentag _ e 33.7% 66.3% 35.0°h 65.0°h ADT/AAD T ACT4,964 AADT4,964 Hour Totals Page 2 LQFEWEI Site Code: 042113 Date Start: 09-Mar-07 Date End: 10-Mar-07 Combined Totals 24 19 13 18 32 7 35 27 20 126 45 321 40 31 29 50 11 150 25 315 44 36 47 44 4 171 11 354 34 40 41 35 9 150 23 311 42 32 43 55 27 172 49 355 39 47 8o 37 36 183 76 344 32 28 30 31 60 121 112 302 43 30 28 109 120 193 238 7 133 80 238 144 9 8 7 4 123 88 283 173 8 4 1 7 147 90 296 225 8 799 1487 1649 31 2286 4811 Counts Unlimtied, Inc. 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Moreno Valley, CA 92557 Page 1 City of La Quinta (951) 247-6716 LQFEWDR Avenida Fernando Site Code: 042113 W/ Davis Driveway Date Start: 09-Mar-07 48 Hour Directional Volume Count Date End: 10-Mar-07 Start 090M7ar Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time CA KA^rninn Affarnnnn RAnr Afar Mnrninn Aeamnnn Mnrninn A9arnnnn Mnrninn ARemnnn 12:00 3 54 4 26 12:15 0 16 1 21 12:30 0 39 1 31 12:45 1 54 4 163 3 33 9 111 13 274 01:00 0 49 1 31 01:15 1 46 0 20 01:30 0 32 2 25 01:45 1 32 2 159 1 30 4 106 6 265 02:00 1 34 0 23 02:15 0 30 0 18 02'30 1 36 0 43 02:45 0 23 2 123 0 40 0 124 2 247 03:00 0 34 0 32 03:15 0 28 0 26 03:30 1 27 0 29 03:45 1 38 2 127 2 27 2 114 4 241 04:00 0 27 0 48 04:15 0 22 0 41 04:30 0 37 2 36 04:45 0 32 0 118 0 44 2 169 2 287 05:00 3 30 2 28 05:15 3 27 1 39 05:30 2 26 2 43 05:45 4 33 12 116 2 40 7 150 19 266 06:00 2 41 3 36 06:15 7 32 2 19 06:30 10 26 12 26 06:45 11 25 30 124 17 26 34 107 64 231 07:00 12 31 18 15 07:15 10 24 25 9 07:30 24 23 20 13 07:45 23 14 69 92 29 10 92 47 161 139 08:00 23 18 16 5 08:15 29 9 23 10 08:30 28 8 34 13 08:45 22 7 102 42 36 24 109 52 211 94 09:00 34 5 39 10 09:15 26 3 25 20 09:30 32 11 29 17 09:45 43 3 135 22 39 22 132 69 267 91 10:00 37 13 24 22 10:15 38 10 31 10 10:30 38 6 33 18 10:45 40 4 153 33 32 11 120 61 273 94 11:00 30 8 32 13 11:15 27 4 34 3 11:30 45 4 29 5 11:45 46 1 148 17 21 1 116 22 264 39 Total 659 1136 Combined 1795 Total AM Peak 09:45 Vol. 156 P.H.F. 0.848 PM Peak 00:30 Vol. 188 P.H.F. 0.870 Percentag 36.7% 63.3% e 659 1136 1795 627 i132 1759 08:30 134 0.859 04:00 169 0,880 35.6% 64.4% Ut 1132 ILOO [GOO 1759 3554 Counts Unlimtied, Inc. 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Moreno Valley, CA 92557 Page 2 City of La Qulnta (951) 247-6716 LQFEWDR Avenida Fernando Site Code: 042113 W/ Davis Driveway Date Start: 09-Mar-07 48 Hour Directional Volume Count Date End: 10-Mar-07 Start 1O-M7ar- Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals e r.....:.,.. ------ u..r..i— Aeern^nn ennrninn Aeernnnn Mnminn Aft.mnon .....o ..... 12:00 ........... ...._...__.. 3 35 ..._...... ...._...__.. ... _. _.._ 3 _..._ _.. 27 12:15 2 34 3 14 12:30 2 40 3 20 12:45 0 39 7 148 2 23 11 84 18 232 01:00 2 27 2 29 01:15 1 31 0 20 01:30 0 24 0 27 01:45 1 22 4 104 0 34 2 110 6 214 02:00 0 30 3 29 02:15 2 21 1 28 02:30 0 33 0 37 02:45 0 27 2 111 0 33 4 127 6 238 03:00 0 29 0 30 03:15 0 29 0 24 03:30 0 19 0 33 03:45 0 30 0 107 0 31 0 118 0 225 04:00 1 37 0 29 04:15 0 29 0 30 04:30 1 24 1 44 04:45 0 38 2 128 0 40 1 143 3 271 05:00 1 27 0 37 05:15 5 33 0 42 05:30 1 18 1 32 05:45 3 30 10 108 0 35 1 146 11 254 06:00 4 34 1 23 06:15 2 41 4 28 06:30 11 29 8 18 06:45 5 42 22 146 8 21 21 90 43 236 07:00 16 29 9 23 07.15 15 20 15 21 07:30 9 16 17 17 07:45 10 12 50 77 16 7 57 68 107 145 08:00 13 13 13 8 08:15 19 6 21 9 0830 27 5 25 18 08:45 28 8 87 32 23 33 82 68 169 100 09:00 40 10 27 15 09:15 28 9 23 19 09:30 41 6 24 18 09:45 34 8 143 33 24 21 98 73 241 106 10:00 32 14 24 19 10:15 28 8 30 13 10:30 33 11 40 11 10:45 30 10 123 43 32 9 126 52 249 95 11:00 33 6 26 6 11:15 35 4 19 6 11:30 30 3 25 4 11:45 32 4 1 130 17 23 1 93 17 223 34 Total DOU IU04 you Ivor rov Wv Combined 1634 1634 1592 Total AM Peak 09:00 10:15 Vol. 143 128 P.H.F. 0.872 0.800 PM Peak 12.00 04:30 Vol. 148 163 P.H.F. 0.881 0 926 Percentag 35.5% 64.5% 31.2% 68.8% e ADT/AAD ADT 3,390 AADT 3,390 T 'J1592 3226 Counts Unlimtied, Inc. 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Page 1 City of La Quinta Moreno Valley, CA 92557 Avenida Obregon (951) 247-6716 S/ Spa Entrance LQOBSSP 48 Hour Directional Volume Count Site Code: 042113 Start 09-Mar- Date Start: 09-Mar-07 07 Northbound Hour Totals Date End: 10-Mar-07 Time Fri 12:00 Mornin Afternoon Southbound Mornin Afternoon Hour Totals Combined Totals 12:15 6 0 25 Mornin A ernoon 4 9 Momin A am on Mornin Aft moon 12:30 12:45 1 8 18 0 13 01:00 1 1 1 0 8 60 10 1 01:15 0 166 14 7 0 8 5 39 13 99 01:30 01:45 0 16 0 02:00 0 12 12 1 58 1 111 02:15 02:30 00 0 11 1 41 2 99 02:45 0 0 16 9 0 8 0 18 03:00 03:15 19 0 44 0 0 43 0 03:30 00 12 0 67 03:45 0 1 19 10 0 04:00 11 14 1 49 0 13 04:15 8 15 112 0 49 1 98 04:30 04:45 0 14 0 21 05:00 0 12 1 14 1 50 0 15 05:15 3 7 0 11 2 62 3 112 05:45 05: 45 1 10 1 13 06:00 3 15 7 40 1 23 06:15 1 12 0 17 3 69 10 109 06: 06:45 45 2 6 0 7 07: 4 14 10 11 54 6 11 9 07:15 15 10 12 4 11 38 20 92 07: 5 8 10 2 0 45 O8::00 19 5 29 35 8 6 12 08:15 9 2 2 35 23 64 58 08:45 09:00 72 4 5 7 09:00 8 2 1y 38 11 6 38 09:15 12 1 28 8 23 76 34 09:45 13 4 12 5 10:00 10:00 19 5 13 57 12 11 10.15 15 3 10 23 15 64 23 121 35 10:30 16 5 8 10:4 5 11: 18 2 29 68 19 18 11 11:15 13 6 17 6 73 38 141 57 11:30 19 1 13 1 11:45 Total 23 2 23 1 69 11 12 Combined 290 443 3 290 443 295 459 65 11 134 22 Total 733 733 295 459 585 902 AM Peak 11:00 54 754 1487 69 10:00 P.H.F. 0.750 73 PM Peak 12:00 0.652 Vol. P.H.F. 60 05:15 0.600 75 Percentag 0.815 e 39.6% 60.4% 39.1 °h 60.9% Counts Unlimtied, Inc. Page 2 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Moreno Valley, CA 92557 City of La Quinta (951) 247-6716 LQOBSSP Avenida Obregon Site Code: 042113 S/ Spa Entrance Date Start: 09-Mar-07 48 Hour Directional Volume Count Date End 10-Mar-07 Start 1007ar- Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals 12:00 2 20 1 13 12:15 2 12 1 6 12:30 1 20 3 7 12:45 1 10 6 62 1 8 6 34 12 96 01:00 1 6 1 9 01:15 0 12 0 9 01:30 0 7 0 11 01:45 0 11 1 36 0 7 1 36 2 72 02:00 2 6 3 9 02:15 1 12 0 16 02:30 0 13 0 13 02:45 0 16 3 47 1 14 4 52 7 99 03:00 0 9 0 11 03:15 1 15 1 14 03:30 0 14 0 15 03:45 0 19 1 57 0 18 1 58 2 115 04:00 0 17 0 17 04:15 0 19 0 17 04:30 2 11 1 22 04:45 1 15 3 62 0 12 1 68 4 130 05:00 1 17 0 23 05:15 1 12 0 21 05:30 2 14 0 16 05:45 3 23 7 66 0 23 0 83 7 149 06:00 1 16 1 17 06:15 0 18 1 14 06:30 5 12 5 6 06:45 2 24 8 70 2 9 9 46 17 116 07:00 10 9 5 9 07:15 5 8 6 4 07:30 5 5 11 1 07:45 9 5 29 27 10 4 32 18 61 45 08:00 6 4 9 5 08:15 13 4 13 6 08:30 6 3 18 7 08:45 17 4 42 15 19 10 59 28 101 43 09:00 25 9 14 2 09:15 19 0 21 6 09:30 13 4 17 6 09:45 17 4 74 17 14 12 66 26 140 43 10:00 15 5 14 4 10:15 20 8 22 12 10:30 19 5 20 8 10:45 13 6 67 24 17 8 73 32 140 56 11:00 27 3 11 3 11:15 15 5 8 4 11:30 11 2 9 4 11:45 13 1 66 11 8 1 36 12 102 23 Total Combined Total AM Peak Vol. P.H.F. PM Peak Vol. P.H.F. Percentag 307 494 801 10:15 79 0.731 05:30 71 0.740 38.3% 61.7% 307 494 801 T ADT 1,535 AADT 1,535 288 493 781 10:00 73 0.830 05:00 83 0.902 36.9% 63.1% 288 493 595 987 781 1582 City of La Quinta La Quinta Resort Visual Classification Count March 9 & 10 2007 Avenida Obregon South of Spa Time Northbound Southbound Large 2 Large 2 Passenger Axle 3+ Axle Passenger Axle 3+ Axle Friday Vehicles Trucks Trucks Carts Vehicles Trucks Trucks Carts 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Tro 9:15 9:30 9:45 Total _ 76 1 0 19 57 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 Total 56 5 2 26 Saturday 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 1130 13:45 Total 82 1 0 Time Friday Tota Total Saturday Total City of La Quinta La Quinta Resort Visual Classification Count March 9 8 10 2007 Avenida Obregon South of Avenida Fernando Northbound Souhbound Large 2 Passenger Axle Large 2 3+Axle o _______ City of La Quinta La Quinta Resort Visual Classification Count March 9 & 10, 2007 Avenida Fernando West of Davis Driveway Time Eastbound Westbound Large 2 Large 2 Passenger Axle 3+ Axle Passenger Axle 3+ Axle Friday Vehicles Trucks Trucks Carts 7:0 7:1 7:3 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total 0 0 12 179 8 0 8 16:0 16:1 16:3 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 Total 0 18 271 3 2 28 Saturday 12:0 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 Total 237 0 0 12 176 2 0 14 City of La Quinta La Quinta Resort Visual Classification Count March 9 & 10, 2007 Avenida Fernando West of Eisenhower Drive Time Eastbound Westbound Large 2 Large 2 Passenger Axle 3+ Axle Passenger Axle 3+ Axle Friday VehirigS Trijrkq Trucks Carts Vehicles Trucks Trucks Carts 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:46 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total 177 9 1 1 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 Total 362 9 9 5 Saturday 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 Total 299 18 Ctty of to Quiff Avenida Oblegtm St. Avenida Fernando 24 H_our DO eCdonel Volume Count Start 07 NoMbo nd Tine Fd . Mara 12700 0 12 Counts Un5m0ed, 25424 Jaclyn Moreno Valley, (951) Hour Totals .AOe Irm Avenue CA 02567 247.6716 SouMbound Mom 2 16 Hair Totals n Page LQOBSFE Site Code: 009088 Data a Coart 0: OOM7 Date E^a 09 Feb-07 CottNitad Ta0a1s 1 , 12:16 3 14 2 i7 ' 12M 1 20 a 22 . 12AS 0 15 4 61 2 .15 6 70 10 131 01a00 0 10 1 19 0ils 0 10 1 7 01:30 3 8 2 " 15 ("As 1 12 4 40 0 15 4 66 8 g6 02A0 0 16 0 10 02:18 0 13 a 9 0230 0 11 0 28 MAS 0 11 0 51 0 12 0 57 0 108 03= f 0 140 9 03:15 0 20 0 19 0330 0 73 0 78 OSA5 0 1s 0 63 1 12 1 56 1 119 040 1 15 1 7 04:18 1 19 0 11 OHO 1 10 0 25 04AS No 0 0 13 3 58 1 10 2 53 5 tag 05:15 2 .12 15 0 0 12 13 0530 0 12 0 17 0w 0 11 2 50 1 21 1 63 3 113 OSOD i i8 3 11 00.15 3 14 2 . 5 0830 4 11 4 7 OM' 07:00 0 7 14 48 3 6 12 29 26 77 6 8 3 4 OMS 10 7 e 4 07:80 11 a 11 5 07A5 om 8 2 3 6 35 24 9 8 31 21 66 45 ME; 10 2 7 14 11 7 000 14 7 21 2 0m 020111 16 1 42 16 34 3 78 23 its 39 9 4 10 10 09t15 12 7 6 8 OmmO 10 2 14 7 09:48 low 9 2 39 15 14 7 44 32 83 47 loas 11 12 4- 9 11 15 8 7 1030 18 2 9 6 IBM 16 2 Be 17 5 8 40 29 " 96 46 11..00 18 3 8 5 11:15 18 3 14 1 IUD 15 1 5 2 Tm Comot 259 '� 259 7 448 8 252 2 499 36 252 10 499 511 17 947 ehl Total 707 707 751 751 1458 -AM Peak 1030 08.15 Vol. 69 79 P.H.F. Mm 0.581 PM P=k 03:15 00715 " Vol. 64 73 P-H.F- 0.800 0.702 Pencartae 36.6% 63.4% 33.8% 66.4% ADTIAAE) T ADT 1.456 AAOT I AN M. Counts Un8m6ed, Inc- Page 1 25424 Jaclyn Avemre Moreno Valley, CA 92W ` aly Of La Quota (951) 247-6716 LQMEWEI La Qttinta H W Malt Enbance Ste Code: 009068 W1 Bsenfum Drive Date Stwt 09-Fe"7 24 HOIm Dire ftgl Volume Count Data Fnd: 09-Fetr07 Stet O%Feb. Essoo and 07 Hare Totals V40slkourM Hour Totals Coonwed TOM& Tkre Fri hfornkm Afternoon i. A oon M Its M 1200 1 30 1 16 1215 4 13 1 it 42* 0 9 1 19 12:45 1 12 6 64 2 14 5 66 11 130 01:00 4 1i 2 18 01:15 0 12 1 13 01M 1 15 1 14 DIAS 5 12 10 58 2 18 6 59 18 115 Oz% 1 17 2 19 02:16 1 11 0 14 02.0 2 21 1 27 02AS 1 14 5 63 2 24 5 84 10 147 03m 1. 15 3 8 03,16 0 5 4 17 03:bD 1 17 5 21 Ows 3 15 5 52 1 16 13 81 18 113 mm 2 14 6 16 04fl5 5 6 4 22 Om 6 45 8 18 0495 5 19 18 64 6 21 21 77 39 131 DO= 2 19 1 24 05:18 4 21 3 26 05;90 5 16 3 3e Ofts Oem 2 5 21 18 13 77 7 24 14 104 27 181 7 22 Oslo 2 20 14 20 W= 5 ?5 6 16 OCAS 9 - 24 21, 87 5 19 32 78 53 163 07" 3 72 11 11 07:15 9 as 3 13 07:30 7 20 17 13 07AS 11 48 30 93 49 22 50 59 SD 152 mm 12 20 /6 6 08:15 17 7 12 13 08:80 13 8 13 OGA5 10 12 52 47 11 .8 14 52 41 104 8s O9A0 11 18 21 11 09:15 16 19 8 16 0921 15 22 20 21 Cull 15 9 57 88 12 16 59 84 110 132 lam 15 13 14 9 1t15 16 9 7 14 10r80 19 8 20 6 1Q45 18 10 66 40 15 6 68 35 122 75 11A0 13 7 11 6 11:15 19 6 12 4 41m 20 .4 m 5 1 ' Yofel Camd bed 347 4 722 27 14 34T 722 370 1 741 57 370 5 T41 121 38 71T 1483 rotrl i089 1089 1111 1111 2180 AM Peak 1095 of= VOL 68 64 PR 0.550. 0.762 PM Paak OWID 051.90 VOL 100 104 P.H.F. 0.767 0.867 Pommag a 32 S% 67.6% 33.3% 68.7% ADT/AAD T ADT2,180 AADT2,180 6, Counts Unfunded, Inc. Page 1 25424 dadyn Avenue Moreno Valley, CA 92W ` City of le Quinta (951) 247-M 8 LCFEWEI Avenida Femando Site Code. 009M Wl MRad a"DOve Date Start; 09FeD47 24 dour Qh jg. el Volume Count Date End: O9•Feb 07 Start 07 Fas6oun0 HourTotels vVes9mnd HourTotsls CombinedTOlats eFW Omi amOOn M°OMewing AOer 0 h Mornho AftMogn 12;00 3 27 8 27 12:15 2 33 0 20 1220 2 41 3 33 . 1296 4 29 11 130 1 37 10 126 21 255 01:00 1 30 3 36 01:15 3 28 1 31 0120 3 27 2 38 0195 1 22 8 M. 2 27 8 132 18 239 02*0 6 30 2 28 02:16 1 27 0 29 02:30 3 34 1 38 02A6 1 31 11 122 a 30 6 123 17 245 O&OD 1 30 2 28 Otis 2 40 3 34 at 1 34 3 31 03.45 3 35 7 145 1 31 9 124 16 289 04,0 4 33 5 27 04r16 •1 24 6- 34 0410 3 42 5 26 0445 5 -• 37 13 138 6 31 22 if$ 35 204 MOO 1 •50 10 25 0515 4 so 6 23 05:0 1D 47 13 36 ' 05>15 10 32 25 179 17 26 46 110 71 289 06:00 • 8 28 15 23 0&16 7 29 8 20 0820 6 14 13 8 OCAS a 23 29 93 13 25 47 76 76 109 07" 18 20 20 11 071.15 26 23 33 17 0790 15 44 41 10 WAS 17 T 74 64 54 14 148 52 222 lit mm 23 10 38 10 08:15 23 11 42 13 0830 32 13 55 14 08A5 17 8 95 42 59 11 194 48 289 90 am 18 8 24 15 09:16 33 15 19 9 GO= 33 13 32 22 Oka 26 12 110 48 40 16 116 64 225 112 1000 .32 17 21 17 1015 32 18 20 1s 10 30 32 13 28 12 10145 37, 9 133 65 30 14 105 59 238 114 IM 46 14 27 8 11:15 46 9 31 5 11:30 44 2 25 6 5 27 6 151 - 22 Il 105 171 256 49 Toth) 667 1152 867 1152 815 1049 816 1049 1482 22D1 combbed TdW 1819 1819 1864 1884 3583 ,AMPsak 1D:45 116AD Vol. lei 194 P.H.F. 0915 OX22 PM Peek 04AS WAS VOL 184 142 A.H.F. 0.9s0 0 934 ParceN a 36.7% 63.3% 43.7% 56.3% T ADT3,883 AAOT3,883 m Counts Unfimfied, Inc. Pam 1 25424 Jaclyn Avenue Moreno Vagey, CA 92557 ` CIVOf La Winta (961) 247-6716 LQFEEOB Avenida Fernando Site Code: 009068 E/ Avenida Obtegon Data Start 09-Feb-07 24 How Directional volume Cams Date Ead: 094 8bd 007%b- Eas bo" HOW TOS6 wesbowid Ho Tct* Combhe4 TUWft 12:00 2 17 1 21 1215 1 281 3 34 1230 1 25 0 25 12745 3 38 7 104 1 22 5 102 12 206 01100 0 21 1 27 0130 0 tt 0 20 Oh45 0 24 0 82 1 17 3 as 3 170 ORflO 0 21 0 17 U215 0 22 1 22 0230 0 23 0 3a O245 0 • 25 0 91 0 20 1 94 1 185 03100 0 20 0 17 - 03:m5 0 30 0 40 am 0 ?B 0 18 03145 0 24 0 110 0 22 0 97 0 20T 040 0 30 0 18 Otis 0 23 2 19 0600 1 23 1 25 04 46 2 '- � 20 3 08 1 17 4 78 7 174 am 2 24 0 to 06:15 7 25 1 17 05:30 0 22 1 21 Osm 1 16 10 87 0 23 2 79 12 166 118•00 2 23 0 21 06af6 1 19 1 10 06:30 3 17 4 8 am 12 71 10 13 49 26 t20 07M07:15 7 1a 2 4 12 5 9 am 10 a 7 6 0795 16 7 36 39 15 8 29 30 a8 69 09500 12 10 13 12 06:16 16 5 18 9 0800 21 6 11 9 am 18 3 87 28 29 7 71 37 138 03 09:00 16 5 10 10 Otk16 18 7 12 13 0930 25 2 18 13 am 21 5 80 19 17 13 63 49 143 65 10i00 29 8 15 12 10:15 18 13 22 8 lam 23 5 9 7 10:45 23 5 93 31 20 10 68 31 159 68 1196 34 4 13 3 11:15 27 2 1s 2 1190 20 1 11 1 I1Aa 21 7 112 A. 13 z 55 8 167 111 cmhm Total 1184 AM Peak 10.46 VOL 114 PJV. O.8m6 PM Peak 03:15 VOL 120 PNF. 0.789 1184 OM iva low 0B45 75 0.647 02: 0 112 0.700 Pa cm .tog 36.5% 64A% 29.49E 70.6% O ADT 2,?A4 AADT2,244 T aid 148 T32 1512 10tm 2244 f Mohaddes Associates a business unit of Iteris, Inc. Firm Description Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Inc. is a consulting engineering firm specializing in traffic engineering, transportation planning and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The firm's staff have extensive experience in multi -modal transportation planning, design and implementation efforts for both public and private clients. The firm specializes in the application of new technologies in urban traffic control to enhance mobility, as well as innovative approaches to the application of historic transportation modes - light rail transit, bus, commercial vehicles, auto and other vehicular modes. Our firm is nationally recognized as an authority in traffic operations, traffic control systems, Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS), Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS), Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS), Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO), and Rural ITS. The staff offers significant experience in travel demand forecasting, policy analysis and traffic impact assessmentimitigation programs. Meyer, Mohaddes Associates was founded in 1991 based on the principle of providing quality products to clients, on time and within project budgets. Meyer, Mohaddes Associates staff is committed to the transportation profession -striving to apply their professional talents to solving the challenging problems of the movement of people and goods in a growing economy. Quantification of the inter -relationships of land use, mobility/congestion and air quality is a technical area in which the firm has excelled. Technical areas in which Meyer, Mohaddes Associates provides services to clients include the following • Systems Integration • System Implementation and Management • Transit/Rail Planning and Design • Travel Demand Forecasting • Traffic Impact Studies • Parking Studies and Design • Neighborhood Traffic Control • Master Planning • Goods Movement • Corridor Studies • Transportation Financing • Policy Analysis • Research and Development • ITS - Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS) - Advanced Travelers Information Systems (ATIS) - Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) - Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO) - Rural ITS • Traffic Control Systems • Traffic Signal Design • Traffic Signal Timing Optimization • Communication and Surveillance • Traffic Operations Meyer, Mohaddes Associates promises principal -level commitment to all projects. The consensus - building talents of the principals of the firm result in many innovative solutions to transportation problems. Public participation programs, business community input and presentations to policy makers are important aspects of many Meyer, Mohaddes Associates projects. The staff at Meyer, Mohaddes Associates take pride in active participation in the transportation profession. It is our goal to continue to advance the profession through creative applications of technology and engineering solutions to enhance mobility and improve environmental quality. The Meyer, Mohaddes Associates corporate office is located at 1515 South Manchester Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92802-2907. The firm has ten branch offices located in Los Angeles, Long Beach, Ontario and Sacramento, California; Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada; Boise and Idaho Falls, Idaho; Minneapolis, Minnesota and Denver, Colorado. Meyer, Mohaddes Associates is a business unit of Iteris, Inc. Additional Iteris offices are located throughout the United States. The following web sites provide more information: www.mmausa.com and www.iteris.com. 400 Oceangate, Suite 480, • Long Beach, CA 90802-4307 • Phone (562) 432-8484 • www.iteris.com a Fax (562) 432-8485 EDUCATION MA, Transportation Planning, University of California, Los Angeles, 1984 BA, Economics, University of California, Los Angeles, 1982 Professional Certificate in Transportation Demand Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 1987 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute of Transportation Engineers Association for Commuter Transportation Association of Environmental Professionals Gary J. Hamrick Principal EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Hamrick has twenty three years of experience managing a wide range of transportation planning projects in Southern California. The range of projects he has managed includes city-wide and area -wide master plans, freeway master plans, arterial master plans, corridor studies, bicycle plans, other non -motorized transportation plans, traffic impact analyses for numerous development projects, goods movement and trucking studies, port area planning and travel demand modeling studies. Mr. Hamrick has specialized in neighborhood traffic management projects, and has worked with neighborhoods throughout California to identify cut -through and excessive speed issues and formulate improvement plans and policies to address neighborhood traffic problems. Another area he has specialized in is goods movement planning, port planning and trucking studies. He has conducted assessments of trucking related impacts, port project studies and goods movement studies at both the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. He has managed numerous projects in downtown, village -oriented areas where the goal is to manage traffic in conjunction with pedestrian and community goals. Mr. Hamrick has overseen many community parking plans that resulted in comprehensive solutions to downtown parking problems and management of parking intrusion into residential neighborhoods. He understands the regional travel demand modeling process, through familiarity with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Orange County regional and subregional models. Mr. Hamrick has also prepared traffic impact fee and infrastructure improvement programs and assists clients with transportation funding proposals. Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering/Goods Movement City of Riverside Circulation Element Update, Riverside, CA. Project Manager for the update study for the City of Riverside Circulation Element. The project covered all key issues including traffic impacts, roadway classification, truck routing, bicycle facilities and included detailed analysis of cut -through traffic in the City. Kaiser Pennanente Campus Planning Studies and EIR TrafficiParking Studies, Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager for the master planning and environmental clearance for long range master plans at two Kaiser Hospital campuses in Hollywood and West Los Angeles. Included quantification of existing parking and traffic conditions, projection of future traffic and parking demands, and evaluation of potential mitigation measures and parking programs. South Bay Area and North Los Angeles County Area Bicycle Master Plans, Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager for the bicycle master plans of the South Bay Area and North Los Angeles Area cities for the LACMTA. These plans included advisory committees of all South Bay and North Los Angeles area cities, which jointly reviewed bicycle facility improvements. Key elements of the master plans included inventories of existing facilities, bicycle usage counts, surveys of all cities plus the County, recommendations regarding bicycle improvements, implementation phasing program and design of high priority projects. City of Glendale Bikeway Master Plan, Glendale, CA. Project Manager for the City of Glendale's Bikeway Master Plan. The master plan process included a comprehensive review of both physical and programmatic bicycle -related issues. A detailed analysis of potential bicycle routes (Class I, II and III) was conducted, taking into account roadway width, right-of-way, parking, traffic volumes, grades and other physical factors. A series of recommended bikeways were developed via three public workshops. Recommended programs included adult and child education programs, helmet programs, bicycle parking, and publicity and advertising for bicycle travel. City of Corona Circulation Element, Corona, CA. Project Manger for Circulation Element update of the General Plan. A new travel demand model was created for the City using the SCAG CTP model, with special emphasis on regional cut -through traffic which occurs significantly on city streets. Goals and policies were developed to deal with the issue of regional impacts on the local arterial street system. In particular, special policies and standards were developed for certain intersections and freeway interchanges where the city is unable to accommodate regional traffic intrusion. City of Livermore General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan, Livermore CA. Project manager for update of the Circulation Element of the General Plan. MMA applied the city's travel demand forecasts to create a recommended circulation system, as well as new goals and policies for the city and the downtown area. Goals and policies were developed to deal with the issue of regional impacts on the local arterial street system. Special policies and standards were developed for certain intersections and freeway interchanges where the city is unable to accommodate regional traffic intrusion. The street system in downtown was reconfigured to accommodate the new downtown plan, including adding angle parking, taking away travel lanes on the main street, and adding lanes on parallel streets. Amerige Heights Development EIR, Fullerton CA. Project manager for EIR traffic impact study and design of internal roadway system. Project included special "neo-traditional" design features such as narrow streets, grid pattern roadway system, internal trail system and traffic circles. The project was awarded the ASCE Orange County project of the year award in recognition of engineering features, including the circulation system. MMA also assisted in planning and integrating project access to the adjacent Sunny Hills High school. Orange County Long Range Freeway Needs Study, Orange County, CA. Project manager for the freeway needs study which provided a summary of existing freeway system conditions in Orange County, future freeway system deficiencies, and assessed a high-level set of alternative strategies to improve long-term mobility. Worked with OCTA modeling staff to apply Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) data to assess year 2030 freeway system conditions and test improvements. Reviewed operational characteristics to determine interchange spacing, volume ranking, existing and future levels of service (LOS). Alternatives were Studied and compared to one another and the advantages and disadvantages of each were summarized. The final technical task was to develop cost estimates, which ranged from $2.5 billion for the medium alternative to $7.0 billion for the high cost alternative. Port of Los Angeles Transportation Master Plan, Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager for traffic forcasting and traffic analysis for the Transportation Master Plan for the Port of Los Angeles. The plan includes assessment of future transportation conditions in the horizon years of 2015 and 2030, including analysis of critical roadway links, intersections, freeway interchanges, truck queuing areas and access points. Utilized the Ports TRANPLAN travel demand to assess future traffic volumes at key locations and participated with the team in the development of improvement concepts. Managed development of a detailed traffic simulation model using "Synchro" for the 1-110/SR47 Connectors Program which resulted in over $120M worth of port access improvement concepts. www.iteris.com gih@iteris.com Page 2 of 3 Parking Santa Monica Bayside District Parking Demand Analysis, Santa Monica, CA. Project Manager for a long range parking and traffic circulation analysis for the downtown Bayside District in Santa Monica focusing on the Third Street Promenade area. Land use forecasts were translated into increased parking demand, then adjustments were made to account for shared use of spaces and differential peaking by office and commercial businesses, recommendations were developed regarding increases in the long term parking supply and more efficient management of the existing parking supply. Newport Beach Balboa Peninsula Parking Management Plan, Newport Beach, CA. Project Manager for a comprehensive plan for parking management on the Balboa Peninsula area of the City of Newport Beach. Developed a series of parking improvement recommendations, including changing meter operations, changes to enforcement procedures, valet parking operations for multiple businesses, re- design of public parking areas, shared use of private parking, and other measures to manage -the parking demand during peak time periods. The potential for residential permit parking was investigated and discussed with California Coastal Commission staff. Downtown Long Beach Parking Management Plan, Long Beach, CA. Project Manager for a comprehensive parking evaluation of parking conditions in downtown Long Beach. The study involved a variety of inventories, including a land use survey and field verification and update of current city land use data; written and in -person (intercept) surveys of downtown Long Beach customers, visitors and business employees, detailed tabulations of public and private parking; and parking space utilization and duration studies in several sites throughout the downtown area. Work also included calculations of parking demand for current conditions and four future condition scenarios and development of recommendations for consideration and approval by a Task Force. PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS, PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS Development of Transportation Impact Fees in Today's Economy, ITE District 6 Annual Meeting, Compendium of Technical Papers, 1993. Commercial Vehicle Operations Planning in Southeast Los Angeles County, ITE District 6 Annual Meeting, Compendium of Technical Papers, 1995. Solving Summertime Parking and Traffic Problems in a Beach Community, ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Technical Papers, 1997 Ports of Long Beach/Los Angeles Transportation Master Plan, ITE District 6 Annual Meeting, August 2002, recipient of 2002 Innovative Intermodal Solutions for Urban Transportation Award in Memory of Daniel W. Hoyt. Instructor for UCLA School of Public Policy Program on Neighborhood Parking and Traffic Impact Mitigation. MTC Technology Transfer Program on Neighborhood Traffic Control — Guest Speaker www.iteris.com gfh@iteris.com Page 3 of 3 EDUCATION MS, Transportation Engineering, University of Wisconsin -Madison, 1990 Bachelor of Business Administration, Transportation Economics, University of Wisconsin -Madison, 1987 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Associate Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers Institute of Transportation Engineers Bicycle and Pedestrian Council Robert K. Olson Senior Transportation Engineer EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Olson has more than thirteen years of experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering. The range of projects he has managed and participated in includes city-wide and area -wide transportation master plans, traffic impact analyses for numerous development projects, bicycle and pedestrian master plans, airport ingress -egress plans, neighborhood traffic management plans, corridor accessibility and streetscape plans, and master plans for major events and developments including stadiums, arenas and major sporting events. RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Lake Bluff Land -Use and Transportation Plan, Lake Bluff, IL. Served as Project Manager of a multi -disciplinary team of consultants on a land use and transportation planning study for the Industrial and Commercial Business District of Lake Bluff. The study resulted in a detailed plan for an improved highway interchange and local street changes to better serve the area along with a land use plan for improving development in the district. The study also included a bicycle and pedestrian plan, as the district is traversed by a regional trail, and an urban design improvement plan. Franklin Park Comprehensive Plan Update, Franklin Park, IL. Project Manager for the transportation component of the Plan. Franklin Park is a unique community as it is located between four of the region's largest inter -modal rail yards. The Village's fifty rail crossings have created significant delay for commuters and truck traffic. The conclusions of the transportation plan included recommendations and policies for roadway segment additions and deletions, congestion mitigation measures, pedestrian and bicycle system improvements. Recommendations for improving parking and land use access were also developed along with a detailed implementation plan. Glen Ellyn Comprehensive Plan Update, Glen Ellyn, IL. Project Manager for the transportation component of the Glen Ellyn Plan Update. The project included a multidisciplinary team developing land use and transportation recommendations and policies for the 2020 plan. The plan included recommendations for street system improvements and neighborhood traffic management, bicycle and pedestrian system development and improvements, and target area plans for key businesses in the community. The final plan also included a detailed implementation program. Naperville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Naperville, IL. Project Manager for the Master Plan development. The project scope was directed at developing a comprehensive transportation system for bicycle and pedestrian travel that would accommodate both utilitarian and recreational use. Significant aspects of the work included: 1) identifying existing transportation conditions and existing trends and needs; 2) developing a vision statement and goals and objectives for the plan; 3) recommending corridors, facility design guidelines, and implementation strategies and policies; and 4) identifying specific improvement projects and preliminary cost estimates. Mokena Bicycle Master Plan, Mokena, IL. Project Manager for the development of a comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan that addressed development of new facilities, necessary improvements, development policies, and detailed plans for priority projects. The project included surveys to identify possible on and off-street corridors, conceptual and preliminary design, directing community participation and information meetings, and preparation of a graphic plan with specifications and cost estimates for priority projects. Southern Illinois University Access and Circulation Plan, Carbondale, IL. Project Manager for the development of a campus traffic circulation and parking plan. The plan included a parking management plan for the campus, wayfinding and traffic sign plan, and a pedestrian and bicycle safety plan for the campus. Cleveland Hopkins International Airport Ingress/Egress Plan, Cleveland, OH. Project Manager for the study of ground access and parking for CHIA as part of the airport's Airport Layout Plan (ALP) update. The airport had recently added a new commuter flight terminal for Continental Airlines and forecast significant growth in passenger traffic. An ingress/egress plan was developed with recommendations for new entrance and exit roadways, on -site circulation, and parking access and terminal curbfront improvements. Plans included long- and short-range improvement plans tied to passenger growth. Operations plans were also developed for a new consolidated rental car campus and off -site parking program. Frankfort Master Transportation Plan, Frankfort, IL. Project Manager for the development of the community's long-range transportation plan. Components of the plan included an inventory of existing conditions, developing traffic forecasts using the regional transportation model, identification of long and short-range improvements, and the development of an impact fee methodology for future annexations into the community. The project also included the development of a neighborhood traffic management manual identifying design standards, traffic management principles, and traffic calming concepts for implementation in new and existing development. Crystal Lake On -Call Traffic Services, Crystal Lake, IL. Project Manager for continual on -call traffic engineering and planning service for the City. Projects included traffic impact analyses, traffic operations analyses, site plan access and parking review, transportation plan development, and public presentation and outreach programs. Chicago -O'Hare and Midway Airports Access and Circulation Plans, Chicago, IL. Participated as senior technical engineer in the development of various transportation studies and plans for Chicago's O'Hare International and Midway International airports. Projects included the development of highway access and operation improvement plans, curbfront vehicular operations and pedestrian access and circulation improvements, parking access and functional design plans, ingress and egress signing, and commercial vehicle operations programs. Brass Mill Center Traffic Impact Analysis, Waterbury, CT. Project Manager for the traffic study for the development of large regional shopping center in Waterbury, Connecticut. The site was a former brass plant and provided numerous access and community consensus problems. The final plan included Interstate highway access improvements, local street and traffic signal changes, and an extensive consensus program to gain approvals from adjacent businesses, residents, the City, and State DOT officials. The development went on to win several awards for creative urban redesign and improvement. Naperville Downtown Parking and Transportation Master Plan, Naperville, IL. Participated in a multidisciplinary team as the Project Manager for the transportation and parking components of the study. www.iteris.com rko@iteris.com Page 2 of The first component involved the functional design review and traffic circulation analysis of two proposed parking garages. The second component involved developing a Master Plan for the Downtown including identification of traffic circulation, access, and capacity problems and potential solutions. The recommended alternatives were coordinated with streetscape improvements being developed as part of the plan. Final recommendations were developed through a community workshop process and an implementation plan was prepared. Park Ridge Uptown Planning Study, Park Ridge, IL. Project Manager for the transportation and parking component of a long -tern redevelopment plan for the Park Ridge Uptown area. Uptown is the heart of the community and home to the City Hall, Library, commuter train station, theater, and numerous retail and commercial sites. The plan developed long and short-term land use and transportation improvements for maintaining the pedestrian -oriented character of the area and improving traffic and parking conditions as new infill development occurred. Lake Bluff Downtown Area Traffic Planning and Urban Design Study, Lake Bluff, IL. Project Manager for the development of a plan to improve traffic access and circulation in Downtown along with extensive streetscape improvements and park space expansion. The recommendations included numerous urban design improvements, street modifications to improve circulation and pedestrian safety, and the addition of on -street parking in strategic locations. 1994 World Cup Traffic Plan, Chicago, IL. Worked closely with the City of Chicago as Project Manager in the development of the vehicular access and parking plan and pedestrian and bicycle circulation plan for the World Cup games in Chicago. The plan included plans for managing private vehicles, taxis and shuttles, and transit service for the games. Pedestrian and bicycle routes were developed and temporary facilities were designed to accommodate the large international crowds. In addition, special plans were developed to accommodate the appearance by President Clinton for the opening ceremonies. A signing program to direct traffic to and from the stadium was also developed. Ravinia District Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan, Highland Park, IL. Participated as project Manager and senior technical consultant for two studies of the Ravinia District in Highland Park. The District has dense, older residential development with access to a regional commuter rail station and the Ravinia Theater which hosts summer concerts and shows at its outdoor stage. Plans were developed for street system and operational improvements for typical day and event -night conditions. Plans were developed in close concert with the City, neighborhood residents, and the Ravinia management through a consensus process. North River Model Industrial Corridor District Traffic Plan, Chicago, IL. Project Manager fir the development of Chicago's first industrial corridor comprehensive transportation plan. The study included: 1) reviewing existing transportation conditions in the area and developing a set of long and short-range improvements to address problems, 2) reviewing traffic studies for proposed developments within the corridor to identify how the proposed improvements, if any, would fit into the overall plan for the district, and 3) projecting the transportation impact of future growth in and near the corridor and identifying improvements necessary to accommodate growth. A key product of the study was the development of an evaluation matrix for prioritizing future projects. The City adopted the matrix as a required element of all future industrial corridor plans. PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS Using Corridor Councils to Achieve Smart Growth Agenda, ITE Annual Meeting, Compendium of Technical Papers, 2001. www.iteris.com rko@iteris.com Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT #5 TjhfOt4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 20, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolutions of the City Council Certifying Environmental Assessment 2006-573, Approving Site Development Permit 2006-865 for the Architectural and Landscaping Plans for a Signature Pool Facility for the Property Located on the West Side of Avenida Obregon, Approximately 150 Feet South of Avenida Fernando on the La Quinta Resort Grounds. Applicant: CNL Desert Resorts, L.L.P. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: C Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent CEQA compliance documents and approving Site Development Permit 2006-865, subject to the Conditions of Approval. The Planning Commission on a 2-2 vote (with Commissioner Daniels absent) failed to adopt a Resolution which would have recommended approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865, subject to Conditions. The Planning Commission voted 4-0 in favor of recommending certification of the Addendum. The Community Development Department recommended approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The applicant's stated purpose for seeking to make these modifications to the Resort is to increase occupancy levels in the off season. According to the applicant, occupancy levels in the summer average 48%, as opposed to the levels in the peak season, which average 75%. The City receives Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT") when the hotel rooms are occupied. In addition, the City receives sales tax revenues from other expenditures by hotel visitors. The City staff has not estimated the expected increase in tax revenues associated with the Signature Pool proposal. However, the applicant estimates the expected increase to be between $400,000 and $550,000 annually. In the 2005-2006 Fiscal Year, the City received $4,118,768 in TOT revenue from the Resort. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Environmental Review The La Quinta Community Development Department has caused to be prepared Environmental Assessment 2006-573 (An Addendum To Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Number 41 and to a series of subsequently approved environmental review documents) for this Site Development Permit in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Of 1970, as Amended (Attachment 1). The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed modifications to the La Quinta Resort do not require a Subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration, since the circumstances described in Section 15162 Of The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines do not exist, in that there will be no new or more significant impacts than those disclosed in the prior EIR Number 41 and the CEQA compliance documents approved subsequently. The modifications proposed, and the circumstances under which the modifications would be carried out, do not require substantial changes to the previous EIR, or the subsequent environmental documents, due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there is no new information of substantial importance which would trigger the requirement of a Subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the Community Development Department is recommending certification of Environmental Assessment 2006-573 if the project is approved. Surrounding Land Uses North: Tennis Villas and date palm grove South: Tennis courts, Tennis Villas, Resort Homes and Spa La Quinta East: Avenida Obregon with the Resort grounds beyond West: Tennis courts and Tennis Villas General Plan/Specific plan Designation CT (Tourist Commercial) Zoning Designation TC (Tourist Commercial) General The subject property is on the grounds of the La Quinta Resort which opened in 1926 and is located on the west side of Eisenhower Drive, south of Avenida Fernando. The site proposed for the "Signature Pool" facility is on the east side of Avenida Obregon, south of Avenida Fernando, which are private streets within the 62 acre resort (Attachment 2). 000582 The La Quinta Resort and Club (originally the La Quinta Hotel) opened in 1926 with 20 casitas, a lobby area and one restaurant. Over the years it has been expanded and modified to include 62 acres and over 800 rooms. Relevant resort development modifications and additions over the years have included: 1926 Opened on December 26, 1926. 1927 Installed nine -hole golf course, the second course built in the Coachella Valley. 1937 Added the first swimming pool to the Resort. 1940's Constructed the Tennis Club offering 30 courts with a choice of hard, grass and clay surfaces (presently there are 23 tennis courts). 1980 Constructed two 18-hole golf courses. 1984 Between 1980 and 1984, constructed 193 casitas and suites with swimming pools, the original Signature Pool (now replaced with sunken center tennis court), the Frank Capra Ballroom and two suites. 1987 Constructed its third 18-hole golf course. 1988 Constructed 371 casitas and a number of swimming pools, the retail area (The Plaza), and two restaurants (Morgan's and Adobe Grill). 1994 Constructed the Flores Ballroom. 1998 Constructed the 23,000 square foot Spa La Quinta and Spa Villas bringing the guestroom total to a little over 800 guestrooms. Prior to 1982 when the City incorporated, development of the Resort was governed by the County of Riverside regulations. The 4.7 ± acre site of the proposed water feature presently is developed with resort recreational facilities, including ten tennis courts (of the total 23 courts), the main Resort swimming pool, landscaped grounds, a children's playground, the Morgan House, and other several buildings. Landscaping consists of a large number of mature Palm and Olive trees. Nine tennis courts, the tennis stadium (center court), a restroom building, the main outdoor swimming pool and playground area will all be removed to facilitate the new water feature. Two of the three retained buildings will be used as part of the proposed pool facility. The remaining Morgan House which has been closed to Resort and public use for approximately one year due to seismic safety concerns will be retained as is with a safety fence installed around it. Proposed Modifications to the Resort's Recreational Amenities: General The proposal is to construct a "Signature Pool" water feature on the 4.7 ± acre site, fronting on Avenida Obregon, a private 20 foot wide street. The proposal would include several water -related and pool amenities (Attachment 3). Proposed amenities include two artificial rock formations, one of which will contain three enclosed slides leading to a splashdown pool and a wave pool, a lazy river that proceeds in a circular loop, a formal outdoor pool with terraces, private pool -side cabanas, an arrival plaza � building, children's outdoor play area and pool, a game room with first aid cQ{QN 5 U 3 indoor and outdoor dining areas, and chaise lounge deck areas. A description of the project which includes a background on the Resort has been submitted by the applicant (Attachment 4). The water features are intended to increase the Resort's summer off-season occupancy (48%) to levels closer to the in -season rate of 75%. The facilities will be open only to Resort guests and La Quinta Resort Club paid members and their children under the age of 23 who are living at home, attending school on a full time basis or in the military. Members' guests will not be allowed to use the facility unless they are staying at the Resort. It will not be open to the general public at any time, nor be available for use by guests of the applicant's other hotels. The proposed water features (water slides, wave pool and lazy river) would be open daily between Memorial Day and Labor. Day from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and on weekends the remainder of the year. In addition, the Signature Pool facilities would be open daily during Thanksgiving week, from Christmas through New Year's Day, on Presidents' Day weekend, and for one to three weeks during the Spring break period. Based upon this schedule, the water feature will be closed approximately 60% of the weeks each year. The formal swimming pool, spa, and children's pools and playground would be open daily with varying hours. The applicant currently uses the open areas of the 4.7-acre site, the deck for special events such as receptions, dinners, and meetings in conjunction with conference guests and will continue to do so after the construction of the new features. Access to the upper area of the rock feature will be closed between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. A ground -mounted speaker and music system will be utilized throughout the facility. Lighting of the facility will consist of ground -mounted or tree -mounted down -shining fixtures. During full operation of the water feature, the applicant has estimated staffing to be 48 people, consisting of 19 lifeguards, eight pool attendants, 15 servers/bartenders, one manager, two assistant managers and three dedicated engineering/maintenance workers. Site Design The swimming pools, spas and children's areas will be located on the east side of the site lot closer to Avenida Obregon. The restaurant building and Morgan House generally separate these pools from the west side of the site where the water slides, wave pool and lazy river are proposed to be located. The area will be secured by various decorative fencing or structures. Fencing is proposed to be primarily six foot high decorative metal picket fencing. The existing masonry wall in front of the Morgan House along Avenida Obregon will be retained and used as part of the perimeter fencing. A new decorative security fence will be installed between the pool area and Tennis Villas. This new fence will be similar in location and design to the existing fencing around the Morgan House. 000584 The pedestrian entry to the water feature will be on Avenida Obregon located approximately in the middle of the frontage in the area where an existing turnaround exists. This turnaround will be maintained and used for loading and unloading of guests using the facility. All pedestrian entrance and exiting will be at this controlled point. A new drop off area is proposed in front of the Spa La Quinta as well as some relocated parking spaces. Presently, between the sunken tennis court and Spa La Quinta to the south, there is an ungated 20 foot wide emergency Fire Department vehicular access from Avenida Obregon to the Tennis Club and restaurant building areas. This ungated access will be maintained to the north end of the Tennis Club building to provide emergency access to this area. At this point, access will be gated to prohibit unauthorized access to the water feature but will allow emergency access. Also as a part of the proposal, a raised median (10 feet wide and 50 feet long) with a turn -around area would be constructed on Avenida Obregon, just south of Avenida Fernando, to control and facilitate vehicle circulation and access in this part of the Resort. Private property owners and their guests adjacent to Avenida Obregon will still have unrestricted access through this entry to their properties. A recommended condition allows the City to require installation and operation of vehicle gates just south of the median in the future if needed to control parking and traffic going to the water feature. The private property owners adjacent to Avenida Obregon would continue to have full access through the street if such a gate is required in the future. This new entry will require removal of nine perpendicular Resort parking spaces and relocation of the adjacent Resort wall on the east side of Avenida Obregon, adjacent to the new median. The site grading will generally be at the same or in many areas slightly lower than the adjacent grades. For example, adjacent to the Tennis Villas to the north in the area of the current connecting walkway, the finish surface next to the lazy river is shown four feet below the walk on the Tennis Villas site and 6.5 feet below the finish pads. On the south side of the site next to the Tennis Villas the proposed grade is approximately the same as the Villa's side. The splash pool is 6.5 feet below the pad of the Tennis Villas located just to the south. The proposed elevations of the lazy river and splash pool were lowered in response to resident concerns. Architecture/Buildings/Structures The existing Tennis Club building near the northwest corner of the site will be expanded slightly to provide tennis locker rooms and a tennis video pro -shop office. These facilities are currently within the 4.7-acre site on the west side of the restaurant building. The current "L" shaped restaurant and bar in the middle of the site will be retained and used as part of the facility. A portion of the building at the northwest corner containing restrooms, lockers, library and the tennis video pro -shop office will 0 5 S 5 removed with those services relocated to the expanded Tennis Club building as noted above. Adjacent to the west side of the restaurant a small one-story first aid station and game room (45 feet by 34 feet) will be constructed. Abasement will be provided and is noted to be for pool equipment. A new one-story building approximately 117 feet long by 34 feet deep (approximately 2,000 square feet) will be constructed at the facility entry adjacent to Avenida Obregon. The building height will not exceed 15 feet. It will function as the secured entry and exit into the facility as well as housing restrooms, a retail area, office, and maintenance and service rooms. All new buildings and additions will architecturally match the surrounding existing buildings and utilize white smooth trowel texture plaster, red clay barrel tile roofing, divided light windows and exposed rafters. The remaining structures on the site will consist primarily of trellises and pool cabanas. The trellises will be constructed of wood (minimum 2"x 6") and be supported by concrete columns or attached to buildings. The pool cabanas will have plaster -finished walls, a standing seam metal roof, and wood construction and be fitted with canvas flaps on the fronts which can be opened and closed. As a part of the proposal, two artificial rock formations will be constructed at the west end of the site. The larger of the two will be the southernmost formation at 28 feet high measured from the finish grade at the base of the formation. It will house three enclosed water slides that empty into an adjacent pool which is to the east of the structure. These three slides will be interior slides. This structure is approximately 180 feet from the closest Tennis Villa to the north; 28 feet from the closest two-story Tennis Villa to the south; and 25 feet from the tennis court to the west. To the north, outside the adjacent Tennis Villas, small patio areas are provided next to the water feature property line. To the south there are no outdoor living spaces for the two-story residential units directly facing the site. The finish grade at the base of this structure is approximately one-half foot lower than the adjacent to the closest Tennis Villa to the south. The second rock formation is located to the north of the above -described structure and will be 18.5 feet high, measured from the base of the formation and will contain wave making equipment for the adjacent wave pool to the east. This structure is approximately 62 feet from the closest Tennis Villa to the north, 138 feet from the closest Tennis Villa to the south, and 38 feet from the tennis court to the west. The finish grade at the base of this formation adjacent to the Tennis Villas to the north is approximately 4.5 feet lower than the Villa's yards. Movie projector equipment will also be housed in this structure for use with a removable screen on the outside of the foundation facing east towards the pool for evening summer movies. The Resort currently shows outdoor movies during the summer months. 00058P I The exterior of these structures will be medium to dark rock -colored gunite sculptured to appear like rock and mimic the nearby mountains. Small trees and shrubs will be interspersed in planters at various elevations on the structures. The applicant has indicated that no tall trees would be placed on the structures. The lazy river, which allows people to tube along its length, will meander in an irregular circle around the wave pool, its artificial rock formation, and a portion of the lounging area. This river will meander adjacent to the Tennis Villas to the north with distances generally between 18 to 35 feet away. The water surface of the river is proposed to be approximately six feet lower than the grade of the adjacent Tennis Villa yards to the north. The children's pool area is located just west of Avenida Obregon and adjacent to the east side of the Morgan House. The nearest Tennis Villa is approximately 12.5 feet away. Morgan House The Morgan House has been listed on the 1997 Mellon and Associates Historic Survey as a historic resource that is eligible for listing as a Historic Landmark at the City, State and Federal levels. A thorough evaluation of the house has been completed by Architectural Resources Group (ARG) as a part of the Addendum for this modification to the Resort. The house is located near the northeast corner of the site and proposed to be retained in place but not used due to its non-compliance with current earthquake standards. No changes to the Morgan House are proposed as part of this proposal, and no future plans have been indicated for this building. The Morgan House will not be utilized in any way in connection with the Signature Pool facilities. The adjacent freestanding one-story garage and storage structure at the northwest corner of the Morgan House is not noted by the Mellon and Associates or ARG reports as an historic structure and will be removed. A decorative safety fence is proposed around the house to ensure the public's safety. The new fence will be similar in location and design to the existing fencing. The setting for the Morgan House currently consists of a childrens' play area and jungle gym covered with a blue canvas shade structure immediately to the east, a temporary trailer and wall to the north, tennis courts and tennis court fencing to the west, and a swimming pool, tent structures, and fencing to the south. The proposed modifications would place similar facilities in the same general proximity to the Morgan House. There will not be a negative change in the character of the Morgan House's setting. Rather, the proposed design of the buildings to be constructed within the Site Development Permit area will be consistent with the Morgan House's appearance. The decorative fencing surrounding the Morgan House will have a more attractive appearance than the fencing which currently surrounds the House, and the blue canvas tarp and jungle gym would be removed. pd��87 Landscaping Landscaping plans show an extensive use of trees and shrubs with an emphasis on color. Planting materials are to a great extent low-water use plants. Specific tree types and locations are shown with sizes varying from 24-inch to 48-inch box size. One of the main trees to be used throughout the site is the Date Palm tree with 15 feet of clear trunk height. California Fan palms will be used extensively and will be between 15 to 25 feet clear trunk height. Shrub planting species are noted as a mixture of tropical -type color and desert. The plans show specific locations for the various shrubs and ground covers. Little use of turf is indicated on the plans. Parking/Circulation The applicant is not proposing to provide new parking spaces for the Signature Pool area. The applicant states that it is not increasing the number of hotel rooms and users of the water feature will be Resort guests and La Quinta Club members who are already using the existing facilities. During in -season and other busy periods, the Resort requires employees to park at an off -site parking lot on Calle Tampico and provides shuttles to and from the Resort. This feature will continue to be utilized when the water feature is in operation. Additionally, shuttles for guests to the water feature and adjacent Spa La Quinta from the main parking lot to the east, the valet area and other parts of the Resort, will be available to reduce the need to drive cars to the site from other areas of the Resort. When in use, the gated or manned station on Avenida Obregon will allow directing of traffic to the most appropriate parking area to ensure parking problems in the water feature area are avoided, and Avenida Obregon remains accessible to emergency vehicles and property owners who use the street for access. In order to widen a portion of the street to provide a median and controlled access on Avenida Obregon at Avenida Fernando, nine perpendicular parking spaces are being removed on the east side of Avenida Obregon. They are installing five perpendicular spaces as shown just south of the adjacent Spa La Quinta, along with new decorative street paving in front of the Spa's entry which currently has five parking spaces. These spaces will be eliminated with the area used as a passenger loading and unloading zone. This new parking area to the south is presently a landscape planter. Due to its 20 foot wide width, Avenida Obregon does not allow parallel parking on either side of the street. Prior to the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted to staff a report, which was distributed to the Planning Commission, documenting current traffic volumes on February 9, 2007 along Avenida Fernando, Avenida Obregon and the main Resort entrance drive (Attachment 5). The report also included an on -site AMID) s 8 parking use survey between 10 a.m. and 10 p.m. on February 9, of the 1,005 i parking spaces available. This survey did not include the remote 230 space employee parking lot on Calle Tampico. } � 1 In summary, the study found that with the 70% occupancy of the 800 rooms available on that day, the Resort was operating within their traffic capacities. Additionally, the highest overall parking demand observed was 52% of the parking spaces in the morning just before the 10:00 a.m. checkout time. The areas of highest parking demand were the main parking area next to the Las Flores Ballroom, and around the Spa La Quinta building on Avenida Obregon. There were parking lots with available parking spaces within 200 to 300 feet of the areas with the highest parking demand. Issues/Analysis: As noted, no additional parking facilities are proposed to be provided for this use. The applicant states there will not be an increased parking demand that will exceed the existing parking capacity because the pool feature is geared to increasing the Resorts occupancy during the 48% off-season summer month occupancy when parking is readily available. Also, based upon their research relating to Resort facility usage, the applicant states Citrus Club members who potentially could use the proposed water feature primarily use the Resort for golf and fitness and make very minimal use of the existing pools. Lastly, less than 20% of these members have qualified children who could potentially use the pool feature (Attachment 6). As a part of the Avenida Obregon entry median area south of Avenida Fernando, staff is recommending the Community Development Director have the right to require the gates be installed and operated during periods of increased parking due to high water feature attendance (Condition No.15.A.1.c.). Once required by the City and until the gates are installed, the Resort will provide a person to man the entry and control traffic allowed to enter the area. During operation of the gates or when it is manned, this entry area will also become the drop-off turnaround for water feature users. Avenida Obregon is a 20-foot wide private street that does not allow parallel parking on either side. 1t is red -curbed and signed as a fire lane with no parallel parking allowed. During peak use periods, there have been times when guests have parallel parked along the street violating the fire lane restriction as well as making use of the street difficult. In the past, the City Code Compliance Department has received complaints regarding illegal parking on the street. As a result, monitoring of the area has resulted in the issuance of five citations in the last 11 months. Regular monitoring of the street for parking violations is done by the City Code Compliance Department. The gate requirement noted above is intended to alleviate this problem. Staff is also recommending that if the City determines, due to parking problems in the immediate area of the water feature operation, up to three parking management studies over three years after the beginning of operation, be completed to determine how to resolve any parking issues. Implementation of improvements recommended by the studies is required within one year of their requirement by the City (Conditions Nos. 23-25). 000580 As a part of the Addendum, an acoustical analysis of mechanical equipment use and expected operational conditions was prepared (Attachment 1). In summary, the findings of the study show that the proposed Signature Pool facilities will operate in compliance with current City noise standards. Furthermore, the amount of noise increase over existing noise levels near the proposed Signature Pool will not be significant. The applicant will be required to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance at all times. The Morgan House is located within the area near the northeast corner of the site. As noted above, the house will remain in place but be fenced off in order to protect both the public and Resort employees from a seismic induced collapse. The setback of the fencing from the house will be determined by the type of fencing. An open decorative fence will require a slightly bigger setback while a solid engineered fence will allow the fence to be closer to the building. Staff has recommended Condition of Approval No. 81 requiring an attractive safety/security fence be installed as a temporary measure (until the structures seismic instability is corrected or it is demolished) with the design and location submitted to the Community Development and Building and Safety Directors for approval. Additionally, a historic resources monitor or structural engineer is recommended to be on site whenever demolition or construction vibration or noise is occurring within 100 feet of the building to ensure its safety (Condition No. 82). With regards to the safety fencing location, the applicant has submitted an engineering report prepared by an adobe specialist with recommendations on where fencing should be placed to ensure that a collapse of the building will not endanger nearby persons. The fence location varies depending on whether the fence is structurally engineered and constructed of a solid material or not. In either case, the location of the safety fence will easily fit within the site plan of the applicant's proposal. As noted above, the historic context of the Morgan House on the Resort grounds will not be degraded beyond that which presently exists. When the house was originally constructed, the area surrounding it was to a great extent undeveloped. Over the years, development of the Resort and surrounding residential development has encroached upon the house. The house is essentially surrounded by fences and walls that either keep persons in nearby areas there or away from the house. Therefore, the installation of these safety fences will not affect the historic context of the house and its surroundings. The Resort presently operates an on -site shuttle service throughout the Resort that will continue when the Signature Pool facilities are operational. Recommended Condition of Approval No. 28 in part requires shuttle service be available to the water feature to assure guests that access is readily available if they need to park in the main parking lots to the east or elsewhere on the Resort site. The area proposed for the Signature Pool is presently used almost exclusively for Resort recreation and with the installation of the proposed water features, the area will continue to be used for that purpose. 000390 In order to provide fire protection access to the two artificial rock structures on the west side of the site, the Fire Department is recommending as a condition of approval that a fire truck gate and access to the west side of the site be provided on Calle Mazatlan where the tennis court is adjacent to the street (Condition No. 105). The gates will allow Fire Department vehicles and personnel access to the artificial rock structures from�the west. This would require a 20 foot wide portion of the existing fences between the three courts be removed or hinged. The net for the fourth court (No. 12) adjacent to the water feature will need to be removed to provide a fire vehicle turnaround, unless an alternative (i.e. removable net poles, access through adjacent Villa Drive, etc.) is agreed upon by the Fire Department. The fire access from Avenida . Obregon that exists will remain. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to consider this request at its meeting of February 13, 2007. The applicant's presentation included a brief history of the Resort and its development as well as a description of the proposed .Signature Pool facility. The applicant noted that it has approximately 1,600 employees. With the increased summer and shoulder month's occupancy, they predict the new facilities will help retain those employees during the Resort's traditionally slow period. Also, they noted the facilities will allow them to compete with other regional resorts that now have these types of amenities. They noted that they made numerous changes to their design to address concerns they had previously heard from surrounding property owners, such as: enclosing all of the water slides;, lowering the grades; lowering the water surface in the lazy river and the splash pool to help retain sound; and reducing the height of the rock formations. During that hearing, approximately 33 people spoke, nearly all in opposition to the request. A number of letters, photographs and other documents were submitted to the Planning Commission (Attachment 7). The speakers and the letters noted concerns such as: increased traffic in an area that is already at times congested;, noise from the water feature users; construction noise and inconveniences;, blocking of views by the taller rock formation; loss of tennis facilities; and loss of the Resort's charm. The adjoining Homeowners' Association has hired the rlaw firm of Guralnick & Gilliland, LLP to prepare a letter in opposition to the proposal. This letter also includes technical reports addressing traffic, parking and noise (Attachment 7). In response to this letter and reports, the City's traffic and noise consultants have submitted written responses (Attachment 8). The City Attorney has noted that the Guralnick letter is based upon the erroneous assumption that the City is proposing to adopt a Negative Declaration in connection with this application. This is incorrect. The environmental documentation which has been prepared for this proposal is an "Addendum." This was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guideline 15164. The Addendum builds on the analysis completed ingRO 31 No. 41 and the subsequent environmental documents. This is appropriate because what is proposed is a modification to a 4.7-acre portion of an existing 62-acre project (the La Quinta Resort), which project has already undergone extensive and voluminous environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. The question isn't whether or not there will be any impacts from the Signature Pool facilities. Instead, the question is whether the replacement of Resort amenities proposed in this application will cause significant impacts beyond those previously outlined in the extensive prior environmental review. The Addendum concludes that with the proposed modifications to the Signature Pool area, the Resort as a whole will have not greater impacts than what has already been identified and accepted. In this regard, it is important to note that the proposal involves no increase in the number of rooms available for rent. Instead, its purpose is to have more efficient usage of the existing capacity of the Resort. The, Planning Commission, with Commissioner Daniels absent, discussed the various issues brought up as well as their ideas and concerns. In addition to neighborhood concerns, items discussed by one or more of the Commissioners included: whether the Signature Pool facilities were too intense for the location; how the facility would be operated; the Resort's right to evolve and make changes; impacts on the surrounding property owners; and possible additional Conditions of Approval, including improvements to the berm along Eisenhower Drive and the existing pathway. The Planning Commission on a 4-0 vote adopted Resolution 2007-007 recommending certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 and subsequent CEQA compliance documents for Environmental Assessment 2006-573. Then, on a motion by Commissioner Quill, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865 (SDP). The vote was 2-2 with Commissioners Alderson and Barrows casting negative votes. The Commission was informed by the City Attorney that City's policy is when there is a tie vote and a commissioner is absent, the item is normally continued to the next meeting so that the absent commissioner can break the tie vote. However, the policy allows the Commission to provide a different disposition if they can do so in a successful motion. Because the Commission action on the SDP was simply a recommendation to the Council, the Commission adopted a motion 4-0 directing that the request be sent to the City Council noting their action and the Conditions of Approval that had been suggested by Commission Chair Quill. Specifically, they requested the following additional Conditions of Approval be considered by the City Council if it is determined that the SDP be approved: 1. That a comprehensive landscaping, irrigation and fencing plan to resolve problems and improve the appearance be prepared for the Eisenhower Drive frontage and southern perimeter adjacent to the Bear Creek Bike Path for review and approval by the Community Development Director. The plan shall be implemented and completed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Signature Pool facility. 00050" 2. That a security operations plan be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval prior to issuance of first building permit. The plans should include items such as security in the pool facility and Avenida Obregon areas during operation and after hours, control of guests in residential areas, etc. 3. That trees on the rock formations shall be limited to small trees that do not obstruct views and are compatible with the local mountain habitat. Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC): The ALRC reviewed this request at its meeting of December 6, 2006, and on a 3-0 vote recommended approval of the request with conditions recommended by staff (Attachment 9). Historic Preservation Commission (HPC): On January 18, 200, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the provisions proposed to retain the Walter Morgan House at the Resort as part of their proposed water feature. The HPC requested the following additional information be submitted: 1. Retrofit costs to make house safe to occupy. 2. Future plans for the house at this time. 3. Plan for maintaining the house if not retrofitted. 4. Discussion of how the building could be used as part of the Resort. This information is required to be submitted and approved by the HPC prior to any alterations to the Morgan House other than demolition of the adjacent detached modern -era outbuilding. Public Notice: This application was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on February 8, 2007. All property owners in and within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the Public Hearing notice as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code. Other persons sent notices included those who sent the City letters or a -mails prior to the publishing of the hearing notice. As of this writing, a number of letters have been received and are attached for your review (Attachment 10). Generally, the majority of the correspondence has been negative citing issues such as increased traffic and parking problems, increased noise, loss of views, loss of the Resorts original ambiance, and construction disturbance. Findings: The Findings as required by Section 9.210.010 (Site Development Permits) of the Zoning Code can be made as noted below. 000593 1. Compliance with the General Plan - The SDP site within the La Quinta Resort is designated by the General Plan and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment #5 as Tourist Commercial which includes recreational uses. This designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Furthermore, the 4.7-acre site has been used for various resort -related recreational uses, including a previous "Signature Pool" where the sunken tennis courts presently exist. Therefore, the proposal is in compliance with the General Plan and Specific Plan. 2. Compliance with the Zoning Code - The City Zoning Map and applicable Specific Plan 121 E, Amendment No. 5 zone the 4.7 acre site within the La Quinta Resort as Tourist Commercial. This designation permits the Resort and related recreational uses such as the proposed Signature Pool water feature. Applicable development standards are complied with based on the proposed plans and recommended Conditions of Approval. 3. Compliance with CEQA - The La Quinta Community Development Department has caused to be prepared Environmental Assessment 2006-573 (an Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Number 41 and to a series of subsequently approved environmental review documents) for this Site Development Permit in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Amended. The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed modifications to the La Quinta Resort do not require a subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration, since the circumstances described in Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines do not exist, as there will be no new or more significant impacts than those disclosed in the prior EIR No. 41 and the CEQA compliance documents approved subsequently. The modifications proposed, and the circumstances under which the modifications would be carried out, do not require substantial changes to the previous EIR, or the Subsequent Environmental documents, due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there is no new information of substantial importance which would trigger the requirement of a subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, upon certification of Environmental assessment 2006-573, the proposal will be in compliance with CEQA requirements. 4. Architectural Design - The architectural design of the proposed facilities, including, but not limited to the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements, are compatible with other plans approved for construction on the Resort grounds and other surrounding development in the City. 000394 5. Site Design - The site design of the facilities, including, but not limited to entries, interior circulation, pedestrian amenities, and other site design elements have been established by the previous development of the 4.7-acre area on the Resort grounds. The center tennis court area has been used for a pool in the past and, with this project, will be again used for that purpose. The proposed facilities will be compatible with surrounding hotel development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. 6. Landscape Design - The proposed landscaping includes, but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials is designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, and provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses. It will provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the facilities, complement the surrounding area and comply with City and CVWD water efficiency requirements, ensuring efficient water use. 7. Sign Programs - A comprehensive sign program, including on -site facility and Resort directional signage is required upon approval of this proposal prior to issuance of the first building permit. Resort area directional signage will include.shuttle routes and stops. Conclusion: The Resort has grown and continuously evolved over the years. It began with 20 casitas' and one restaurant. Over the years it has been expanded and been modified to include 62 acres and over 800 rooms, along with extensive recreational activities including golf, tennis, fitness, biking, and water activities. The Signature Pool proposal is an evolution of the recreational activities at the resort. During the final preparation of this staff report on February 16 staff received from the applicant a letter outlining additional measures the Resort was willing to undertake and clarification on the additional Transient Occupancy Tax the pool feature is expected to generate (Attachment 11). Staff will review this letter and provide a report at the public hearing. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The Findings for approval can be made as noted above and in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent CEQA compliance documents and approving Site Development Permit 2006-865, subject to the Conditions of Approval; or a 2. Deny the request; or , O a I 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Douglas . Evans Community Development Director Approved for submissio by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Addendum (EA 2006-573) Note: Previously distributed to City Council and Errata to Addendum attached 2. Location Map 3. Plan exhibit booklet — City Council only 4. Signature Pool description 5. La Quinta Resort & Club Current Traffic Volumes and Parking Conditions 6. Letter from Paul J. McCormick dated January 11, 2007 7. Items submitted to Planning Commission at meeting of February 13, 2007 8. Noise and Traffic Consultant's response letters 9. ALRC minutes for the meeting of December 6, 2007 10. Letters received from public — Separate attachment due to size 000596 1404ifta RESORT & CLUB January 11, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Board Dear Mr. Evans: ATTACHMENT #8 It has come to our attention that some members of the planning Board are of the opinion that the addition of the Signature Pool at La Quinta will create more membership demand at that resort. We have reached a different conclusion based on membership demographics and general use patterns over the past several years. Typically, the Citrus members use the resort for tennis and fitness. With the reduction of the number of courts from 23 to 13, it is very likely that there will coming to lire resort to play tennis. be fewer members fitness facilities will not be expanded- so we anticipate that there will be no additional membership demand to use these facilities. As a general rule, Citrus members make very minimal use of the existing pool. The Primary users of the pool are hotel guests. Additionally, Citrus club usage ofthe new Signature Pool is limited to members only. Membership is defined as a Member, his or her spouse and their unmarried children, under the age of 23 who are living at home, attending school on a full-time basis or in the military. Our current records indicate that 70% of Citrus members are over the age of 50 (with 30% over the age of 61). Less titan 20% of all members have children under the age of 23 with the majority these being Young adults. Therefore, with the activities of the Signature pool targeted towards Younger children, we believe that tite children of the Club members will have a nominal affect on the usage of the Pool. For these reasons and those articulated in previous meetings, we continue to believe that the Signature Pool will drive resort occupancy, but not create any further member usage of the resort, Should you have questions or need additional information; please let us know. fe President and General Manager Quinta Resort and Club j. 49-499 Ei,en " Dti, , U Quints. Wilinnu 92253 000597 wvm-1aWimazvt.uun Td. 760.564A I11 F,= 7611.56i.571N ATTACHMENT #9 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 13, 2007 CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was reconvened at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Quill who asked Commissioner Alderson to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Ed Alderson, Katie Barrows, Jim Engle, and Chairman Paul Quill. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to excuse Commissioner Daniels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Doug Evans, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Planning Manager Les Johnson, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Assistant Planner Yvonne Franco, Senior Code Compliance Officer Anthony Moreno, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Quill asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of January 23, 2007. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Barrows to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. A. Environmental Assessment 2006-579 and Site Development Permit 2006-865; a request of CNL Desert Resorts, L. P. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a signature pool facility, for the property located on the west side of Avenida Obregon, approximately 150-feet south of Avenida Fernando, within the La Quinta Resort. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the informat'F C)598 contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in t e Community Development Department. Staff reviewed the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2007\2-13-07.doc Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 revised Public Works Department conditions. Mr. Tony Locacciato, Impact Sciences, the City's CEQA consultant, gave a presentation on the EIR Addendum. Community Development Director Doug Evans gave a history of the Resort, traffic reports and parking. Staff noted each time there has been a change to the Resort the City has evaluated the environmental impacts. 2. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked if in the analysis of the grading would there be any import or export or soil. Staff stated there will be some export for the excavation of the proposed pools. The applicant will have the accurate export amount. Commissioner Alderson asked the timeframe is for the construction. Staff suggested the applicant would need to answer that question. Commissioner Alderson asked what future use the Morgan House would have and would it be related to this pool. Staff stated the Morgan House is technical issue. Under California law it needs to be renovated and re - enforced or demolished over time. At this time there is no proposed use associated with this project and no impact from this project on the House. Staff will be working with the applicant on all historic buildings on the property. 3. Commissioner Barrows asked staff to clarify the parking that would be eliminated and outline the entry gate turnaround area. Staff indicated the changes to the parking spaces at the entry that would be eliminated on the site plan. Commissioner Barrows asked if the rock mountain structures for the pool had any height constraints in regard to the City's height limits. Staff stated they are within the City's height limits. Commissioner Barrows asked the City's height limitations for Tourist Commercial areas. Staff stated they are allowed up to 40-feet. 4. Commissioner Engle asked the height of the southern rock feature. Staff stated it is 28 feet. Commissioner Engle asked the height of the buildings to the north of the rock features. Staff stated they are approximately 26 feet and the shorter rock is 18.5 feet in height. Commissioner Engle asked if the pool would primarily be a summer use. Staff stated yes. 5. Chairman Quill asked what the finish grade would be for the lazy river and pool. Staff stated in this case they were referring_ to the deck area at the base of the rock feature. It is not tAO 0 U 9 9 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 water level which is approximately six inches lower. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated the splash pool for water slide feature is approximately four feet below grade. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Pena, consultant for the La Quinta Resort, gave a presentation on the history of the Hotel. Mr. Paul McCormick, General Manager of the La Quinta Hotel, gave a presentation on the effects of the Hotel in the community and the proposed project. 7. Commissioner Alderson asked the applicant the estimated time of construction, how much dirt would be exported and how many gallons water will be flushed out of the system into the water table. Mr. McCormick stated the construction should take between ten and 12 month. Mr. David Urban, CNL Hospitality Corporation and Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting, stated the export of dirt should be 12-15,000 yards from the construction of the pools. The backflush of water should be 13,500 gallons every four days going through a septic system, into percolation pits and ultimately recharge the groundwater. It is domestic water that refills the pools. 8. Commissioner Barrows asked the applicant to identify the public meetings they had held with the local residents. Mr. McCormick stated they held meetings on June 28`" and September 7`" at the Resort. Notices were mailed to everyone within 500 feet within the property boundaries. They have also met with Homeowners' Association Board (HOA) board, opposing counsel, and the HOA from Santa Rosa Cove. Commissioner Barrows asked what measures they were taking to incorporate water and energy conservation into the project. Mr. McCormick spoke to the landscaping plans and how energy conservations measures would be taken in regard to the plant material. Mr. Urban stated water conservation is a concern and cost issue for the Resort. The pools operate on a closed loop system. They recharge from the splash pool area. It is not new water that is constantly being discharged out. Most of the area is hardscape and will continue to be. They do not have a lot of high water plant users. They will be centralizing the mechanical equipment and they will be at higher elevations to minimize O 0 6 O O pump sizes which will reduce noise as well as being energ Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 efficient. They can also segregate the active pool area from the formal pool area. Commissioner Barrows asked if the pump system would be state-of-the-art with respect to energy conservation. Mr. Urban stated that was the focal point of their design. 9. Commissioner Engle asked if the landscaping plans complied with CVWD requirements. Mr. McCormick stated yes. Commissioner Engle asked about security issues. Mr. McCormick explained their security system as to who is patrolling which streets/areas. Commissioner Engle asked if the pools/slides could be seen from Eisenhower Drive. Mr. McCormick stated they would not be seen from Eisenhower Drive or Avenida Obregon. 10. Chairman Quill asked about noise attenuation from the pumps especially from the wave actuator. Mr. McCormick explained how the pumps would be under -ground and insulated to reduce the noise. Mr. Bob Robby, noise consultant, stated the mechanical equipment is located inside the mountain to provide . a lot of attenuation. The wave generator, the venture which creates the wave is below the surface of the water so there will be no audible noise. Chairman Quill asked about the length of the construction phase in particular how they would handle the parking and noise. Mr. McCormick stated the Hotel will be operating during the construction phase so they will be sensitive to the length of time it will take to construct the project as well as any noise issues. Chairman Quill asked about the complaints they had received regarding the traffic problems along Avenida Obregon. Mr. McCormick stated their on -site security has been increased and they will continue to ticket those who are violating the parking requirements. They are also trying to improve their reaction time to remove the violators. Chairman Quill asked if the lack of tennis courts will be addressed. Mr. McCormick stated the tennis program is a viable part of their business, but the play has decreased over time. Their plans are to enhance the remaining existing courts as well as adding courts elsewhere on their property. Chairman Quill asked about the finish water surface elevation of the pool and lazy river at 43 feet; how does this relate to the rock mountain structure. The finish floor elevations of the adjacent tennis villas at about 49.5 feet which makes the water surface approximately 5.5 feet below the two-story tennis villas to the north. He is trying., 00601 to understand the height of the 28 foot mountain as it relates to V Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 the tennis villas. Mr. McCormick stated they measured them and the tennis villas to the top of the chimneys is about 29.5 feet. Chairman Quill asked how that 28 foot elevation relates to the 43 foot water surface elevation. Ms. Anne Guillebeaux, EDSA, landscape architect for the site, stated that in the southwestern corner of the tennis villa site, the adjacent grade at the base of the Villas is 46 feet and the adjacent grade at the pool deck is 46 feet. Chairman Quill stated the plans show the finish floor of the first floor of the Villas is 49.5 feet. Mr. Barret Bruchhauser, MDS Engineering, stated they would be at an elevation of 49.5. Chairman Quill asked what does the 28 foot height elevation of the mountain relate to is it related to the 46- feet or the water elevation. Mr. Bruchhauser stated the top of the mountain is actually 75 feet above sea level. Chairman Quill stated that therefore, the top of the buildings will be the same as the top of the mountain peak. Mr. Bruchhauser stated that was true. Chairman Quill asked how the rocks would be treated to appear real. Ms. Guillebeaux stated they have drafted contracts with detailed specifications that the contractor will be held to. Chairman Quill asked if the intention is to mimic what is in the Cove. Ms. Guillebeaux stated yes. Chairman Quill asked about the requirement of the Fire Department for a rear access to the pool equipment. Mr. Urban stated it will be taken care of on site and they have asked for an alternate site. Chairman Quill asked how the pool users would be identified. Mr. McCormick explained how people would gain entrance to the pool and how they would be screened to ensure only those who have access are allowed in. They must have proof of registration or membership before entering. 11. Chairman Alderson asked how guests of a member would be allowed. Mr. Urban stated they have not identified how this will be handled yet. The member cannot pay a fee to have their guest attend. If they are a registered guest, they would have access. Mr. McCormick clarified that when he stated earlier that tennis courts would be added to their property, he was referring to the Citrus Course property. 12. Commissioner Barrows asked about the trees shown on top of the rock mountain that are probably 12 feet high and how this would blend with the local landscaping. Mr. Urban stated a recommendation was to incorporate some planting elements to illustrate a realistic landscape to create a lush desert oasis f.VI 00602 and not just have bare rocks. Commissioner Barrows stated h r Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 concern is that if they are trying to blend these that to add 12+ feet on top of the mountain may affect the views of the neighbors and may not be the best way to go. Mr. Urban stated it is not their intent to add 12-foot trees. They do not intend to obstruct any views. Commissioner Barrows stated there is a residential environment surrounding the resort and this is a typical resort; how has it worked in other areas. Mr. McCormick stated that one of the benefits of being a part of Hilton is that they have a lot of properties that operate in different environments. He went on to describe how a pool with a slides works in their other facilities. Commissioner Barrows asked about special event purposes such as weddings; how often would these occur and would there a cut off time. Mr. McCormick stated the cutoff time for the water feature is 6:00 p.m. They currently utilize space within the hotel for special events without complaints. 13. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Quill asked if there was any other public comment. Roger and Madeline Lolley, 77-317 Avenida Fernando, stated they live at the Tennis Villas and were not notified correctly of the meetings. As they were not notified in a timely manner. This project will affect their property values. They will be losing rental fees during the construction time; will they be compensated for the lack of rentals during the construction of the project? This is a water park, not a signature pool. It is foolish to think people will come here because of a water slide. This project will detract from the full time people who come here for a quiet environment. Even though the numbers are right does not mean it is morally right to do it. 14. Mr. Wayne Guralinick, Corporate Counsel for the Enclave, Tennis Villas, and Los Estados, which surround the proposed project. He reviewed an aerial of the site. Staff would not have brought this project forward to the Commission if it was a stand-alone project with 14-foot setbacks from residential homes. There is no doubt this is a water park that belongs in an industrial area. They want to be good neighbors. At a minimum there should be substantial continuance to have the applicant meet with the HOAs to come up with substantial mitigation and less of the intensity. They recognize the Hotel might need to renovate some of the tennis courts and add some water features, but not a water slide at this scale. 000603 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 15. Ms. Marie Mack, Esq., attorney for the surrounding residential homeowners, stated the technical studies provided by the applicant are grossly inadequate. This project should be denied and reanalyzed due to the close proximity to the residences. Ms. Mack went over the issues stated in her letter of February 12, 2007. 16. Ms. Kay Wollf, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, representing the Cove Association, raised issues regarding landscaping on the west side of Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and the bridge, property owned by the La Quinta Resort. The City has cited the Resort in order to have this landscaping restored to its original condition. It is still inadequate and not fixed. They would like to request that if this project is approved they should be required to upgrade the landscape including the chain link fence with a living fence, and trees for shade that would create an inviting image to the Cove residents. 17. Mr. Jack McDonald, 49-035 Calle Flora, stated they want the hotel to continue to be successful. They support the amenities of the hotel but also want the community to be a good place to live. Second they are concerned that the proposed water park will hurt the hotel and nearby communities. The noise study inadequately addresses the actual noise that will be generated from the park. Third, there has been inadequate time to evaluate the impact of this water park. More time is needed to evaluate it properly. He has only had ten days to review the noise study and if they had adequate time, they would probably find the same issues with the traffic study. Fourth, they request the Site Development Permit be denied. 18. Ms. Judy Ely, 76-972 Calle Mazatlan, stated they bought their property as a tennis resort. Imagine their disappointment when they found out that the tennis courts would be reduced by 40% as well as the addition of a water park right in the middle. The current recreation uses can be divided into two parts; pool and tennis uses. These uses are located away from the residential uses. To understand the density she counted the number of lounge chairs shown around the pool and it came out eleven times the population density of the tennis courts. Eleven times the people means significantly more noise. The two rock mountains are the same height as the tennis villas which means their views will be obstructed. A water park in a resid"Ot1h G 0 4 area is not tolerable. �1 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 19. Mr. William McCane, 79-205 Fox Run, moved to this location out of Santa Rosa Cove due to the amount of noise coming from the Hotel activities. The notice sent out regarding this hearing was confusing and incorrect in its definition. It sounds like the use has already been approved. He also does not understand how the notice can state there will be no new significant environmental impacts. He does not understand how the Community Development Department can come to this conclusion. This is a major redevelopment involving the demolition of about half of the available tennis courts, large swimming pools as well as walkways and parking totaling 195 square feet of demolition. It also includes six months of construction noise and fumes in an area that already has problems with traffic and safety. Once completed this will be a full scale waterpark in the middle of a pre -established residential district generating traffic, parking, noise, and light impacts. The issues of compatibility with adjoining uses and the right to a quiet environment as well as reduction of property values. There has been an evolution of a Hotel, but there has also been an evolution of the residential uses adjoining the Hotel that has not been mentioned in the findings. This project does not belong in this location. 20. Mr. William Puget, 77-600 Avenida Fernando, stated he lives directly across from the conference center at the Hotel. They have lived here for 20 years and strongly object to the water park. It is inconceivable that there are no significant impacts. The notion that the users of the pool will be limited to only guests of the hotel and membership is not true. They have heard that the Estates at Point Happy are also offering memberships with access to the Hotel amenities. There may be other developments who also are offering memberships as well. Who is going to enforce the users of the pool? It is an illusion that there will be a controlled access. He urges the Commission to vote against this project. 21. Mr. John Lissberger, 77-385 Loma Vista in the Mountain Estates, stated he has lived here for 20 years and has been disappointed with the City. The people who live here are abused. This historic Hotel is slowly being eroded and encroached upon. They were promised that the Mountain Course would stay a private course. Since KSL bought h Hotel, now the course is not private. Avenida Fernando i� � 0 6? 0 5 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 private road and multiple uses such as trucks have been using it. He would respectively ask that it be declined. 22. Ms. Mary Jane O'Connor, 77-343 Avenida Fernando, stated the hotel uses this area for most of their parties, weddings, bands. She has called the Hotel to complain on numerous times about the noise and has received no response. The pool is to have limited access with the gates locked and she knows there are numerous people that have been in there from outside the area. The parking spaces are taken by vendors and parking is not enforced. They state they will be planting trees on top of the mountain that will block their views. She has a great concern about the traffic that will be generated by the project. 23. Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Via Sierra, president of Mountain Estates HOA, stated that from where lives at the tennis villas she could stand on her deck and dive into the lazy river. Her concern is the number of trucks lined up to make their deliveries at 7:00 a.m. What about all the other condo projects that bought membership into the Hotel Club. How will they all get to the pool? How are they going to get to their homes with all this additional traffic? They already fight the traffic just to get home. 24. Mr. Rick Bylsk, 76-980 Avenida Fernando, President of the Los Estadoes HOA, stated he recognizes the benefits and successes of the Hotel. Their properties are tied very closely to the success of the Hotel because of the amenities offered. They were concerned when they learned about the signature pool, as there isn't even a definition of a signature pool. This is a water park or a morphing of the Hotel's quiet ambiance. Looking at the pool area with over 200 lounge chairs that will be increased to 700 is a strong impact. He would strongly encourage the Commission to deny this project. 25. James Carley, 77-303 Mazatlan, stated he has been a homeowner for 15 years and is against the pool because of the impact of additional traffic and noise. He purchased his home for the tranquility. A 30-foot water slide is not below grade and not tranquil. 26. Jeff Nagelberg, 49-045 Calle Flora, stated his concern about the timeline of the project. They will not be able to comPH-0 C 0 6 this project in ten months. People in Santa Rosa Cove have Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 already had water table issues. If this percolation system is faulty in any way it will cause remarkable damage. Will he be forced to listen to a movie when he sits out at his pool. Living in the Cove you know how noise will rebound off the mountains. The idea that this project will not impede on them, is ridiculous. He urges the Commission to at least delay the project and ask CNL to move the project further back onto their own property. 27. Mr. Bram White, 77-631 Los Arboles, stated he too is concerned with property values, safety, security, traffic and noise. Hearing this project characterized as a water park, he has taken his children to Raging Waters and he would not want that located here. This is not a water park and will not be open to the general public. If it were he would be strongly opposed. In terms of traffic, if it is open only to the Hotel guests and members, the Hotel is limited number of rooms and can only sell that number of rooms. He does not see all the noise concerns that are being expressed. He hears kids making noise in the pools in his neighborhood and they will make noise wherever they are. Construction is taking place all over the City as well as at the Hotel and it does go away. He would ask everyone to view this in the big picture that the concerns are a little overblown. 28. Mr. Bill Bresnaham, 78-420 Calle Felipe, stated he is a member of the Club. He has found that the Hotel has been very reluctant to enforce their rules at the pools and tennis courts. They will need to change their system if they are going to improve this. How will they be forced to live up to what they state they are going to do? Will the City's Code Enforcement Department take care of the parking problems along Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando. 29. Mr. Tom Leverty, 48-805 Via Linda in the Mountain Estates. He has two issues. In the June 281" presentation they were told that the competition for this type of amusement park ranged from 2 to 2.5 acres. This is proposed on 4.7 acres. They want to work with the Hotel, but they need to work together. They have asked them to speak to their HOA. If all 3,000 of the people who live in the area would go to dinner one time a year at the Hotel it would cover the 15,000 covers they will get from the Hotel guests. 000607 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 30. Mr. Jay Green, Mountain Estates, stated the notice says the applicant is CNL and questions and answers have been addressed to CNL. If he understands it correctly, CNL has sold the Hotel to Morgan Stanley, and CNL will be gone. Who is the applicant when CNL is leaving town? Is a corporate interest going to trump the interests of the 200 odd residents who are here tonight? 31. Mr. Paul Keye, 49-991 Mazatlan, stated he is impressed with the Hotel and is concerned with what they will bring in next. He is surprised that this development would not require any additional reports. The Tennis Tournaments were previously held at the Hotel. What drove the migration of the Tennis Tournament championships to Indian Wells? Would you buy a home next to a signature pool. He hopes he did not. 32. Mr. Steve Davis, 77-500 Avenida Fernando, stated the Resort does not own Avenida Fernando and it is not a public road. He and Mr. Puget own a portion of the road. Their portion goes to approximately to the middle of the road. The road is about 24- 25 feet wide. He displayed pictures of trucks that travel down Avenida Fernando and the problems that are incurred because of this traffic. The truck in the picture is 70 feet long. They deal with approximately 20-30 of these trucks a day. The truck is stopped because it hit his wall and got stuck in the driveway. The truck actually hit his wall twice trying to deliver to the hotel. He informed the City that he is currently in litigation that the Resort owners have overburdened their easement rights on this road and they are asking for extinguishment of the easement. The City may want to consider that if they grant rights to this project, there is an act of litigation that is asking for extinguishment of their right of the road. He was never asked if they had any objection to use of the road. Staff referenced an EIR that was done in 1975. There were seven other means of access into the Resort at that time. If there are 6,000 cars a day going down Avenida Fernando is that still an adequate EIR. 33. Mr. Thomas Harms 79-605 Cetrino, stated one of the reasons we have zoning, planning and environmental assessments is to ensure there consistency in compatibility between housing. What was true in 1975 is that staff was talking about what the environmental concerns were and that is not necessarily tr100608 today. This land has been extensively developed and as part Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 that development those same issues were addressed and satisfied. What is being asked at this meeting is a request to change that judgement that was made. In his opinion there are two questions that are appropriate to be raised. One is whether or not it is good for the applicant to make money if that is a change in the decision of the City at that time. Rather the question is, is the change being requested material. Here there is a proposal to change the density of use substantially; a proposal to change the noise significantly; and a proposal to change the lighting. Are those changes adverse to the existing property owners who were in the prior environmental assessment promised one thing. The response would be that the change will be adverse and because there is a material adverse change, he does not believe that the finding that there is no adverse change is appropriate and this application should be denied. 34. Mr. Ron Olson, 77-905 Laredo Court, stated he is opposed to the water park for three reasons: traffic, the parking situation, and noise on Obregon. He is a member of Tennis and Fitness Club at Resort and has found it is very tough to find a parking space. He therefore has resorted to different ways to travel to the Resort. Avenida Obregon is so narrow that two cars can hardly pass each other. Walking is another means of getting there, but you find that two cars cannot pass. The original EIR did not consider the size of the vehicles that are now being driven. The golf cart is another option to travel to the site but there have been instances when they too have almost been hit by a CVWD truck. What provisions have been made for golf carts and bicycles to travel to the Resort as well as park at the Resort? Noise is another issue as he can hear the band that plays every afternoon at his house which is % of a mile away. What happens if the water park fails? What will happen to this "white elephant"? Also, will it be open to the public? 35. Mr. Scott Holmes, 77-490 Calle Cadiz, stated he owns two lots in the Enclave and Mountain Estates and asked that the application be denied and we all go home. His concern is that the extra traffic at the turn around area is going to cause the residents to the Mountain Estates to wait to enter their gate to get home. If the purpose is to increase occupancy during the summer, then why be open at Thanksgiving and Christmas? It is one thing to say noise levels meet standards and to live ne91:00699 door to it. How many of the Commissioners have been to Soak Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 City and how many would like to live next door to this? 36. Mr. Ed Mittelbusher, 77-333 Calle Mazatlan, asked if the Hotel feels that noise and light are not an issue, why not move it closer to Rinker Pool where it would only affect or not affect their guests? Why put it in the middle of a residential area. Yesterday there were at least six Morgan Stanley executives touring the facilities and there are none here at this meeting. Do they not want to hear what the people want to say? With the removal of the tennis courts they asked if they would be receiving a reduction in their tennis dues. They were told no, they would be raised. 37. Mr. Hayes O'brien, 48-840 Eisenhower Drive, stated he is member of the Club and is a real estate developer in Minnesota. He understand the right of a developer to develop their property, but he is concerned that this use of their property is tempered by the rights of surrounding property owners. The rights of the adjoining property owners are being trampled by the adjoining property owners. This is the wrong project in the wrong place at the wrong time. Please deny project. 38. Mr. Richard Fredericks, 49-875 Avenida Obregon, stated this is a safety disaster on the City's hands. He then gave pictures he had taken that were examples of the situation that currently exists along Avenida Obregon. Avenida Obregon is essentially blocked with bumper to bumper cars. Someone is going to get killed. This is the most ill advised proposal. The Resort does not keep its word. Tentative Tract Map 28545 showed that Avenida Obregon was to remain open and it was cut in half without public hearings. The parking on the tract map was reconfigured on Vista Flores from parallel parking to back out parking. There is no parking lot that meets the Zoning Code. Either the City cannot or will not enforce it. This water park will be bringing hundred or people to an area with no sidewalks. He is an abutting property owner and has an easement and his easement was cut in half from 40 feet to 20 feet without a public hearing or asking him his rights. The Resort does not police itself. You would think several citations would have been issued and yet only five citations were issued. Emergency vehicles could never get through. The Police say it is private property, but a fire lane is a fire lane and should be patrolled. He submitted the Property Rights provision of TT 28545 "0 610 were not adhered to by the Resort. He then submitted the Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 Council Minutes into the record. Avenida Obregon is a collector street and is to be 40 feet wide. When you do not comply with the Zoning Code you will have a disaster. 39. Mr. Joseph A. Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, stated he agrees with Kay Wolff in regard to the berm on Eisenhower Drive that has not been maintained for 20 years. The Resort has not been a good neighbor no matter who has owned it. He would urge that a condition be added to this project to require the Resort to fix and maintain the berm along Eisenhower Drive. 40. Ms. Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Via Sierra, questioned the season CNL says the park will be used. What do they determine to be the "season"? It is not just a summer time, it will be more than just the summer months. People use their pools in the shoulder seasons as well. 41. Mr. Phil Motts, Santa Rosa Cove, stated there are 2500 members to this cove and everything stated here should be multiplied by that number. 42. Mr. Jay Vaden 77-471 Loma Vista, stated he is concerned about Avenida Fernando because there are no sidewalk and very poor access. The triangle section crossing Avenida Obregon needs to be improved. He almost hit a lady walking in this area. There is also a new project that is being process across from the Tennis Villas. This is a matter of promotional sales. He loves the Hotel but does not like the way it has been run. 43. Ms. Leslie Fredericks, 49-875 Avenida Obregon, stated the La Quinta Hotel does not own all the area on Avenida Obregon. If she heard correctly, they are proposing another new gate on Avenida Obregon and she would like to know if this is true. Chairman Quill stated there will be no gate unless there is an issue and if that issue cannot be resolved by first placing a guard at this location. Ms. Fredericks stated she is a single- family two acre residents trapped in tourist commercial. If this gate is built, she is cemented her future as being a part of the La Quinta Hotel. 44. Mr. John Duggen 48-770 Via Linda, stated Mr. McCormick has stated the access to, and use of, this water park will �,e restricted to guests of the hotel. He would like to Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 definition of what a hotel guest is. He is particularly concerned that guest passes will not be given on a day basis. Will the guests be defined as being occupants of the Hotel? Chairman Quill stated that is the understanding before the Commission. 45. Mr. Ted Newell 77-160 Avenida Fernando, stated the 2500 members that do not use the facility all that often. The parking studies overlook the significance of the members who do not use the membership. If they put a water park in, he would be taking his grandchildren to the park which is another impact on the traffic. If you look at all those who will now be using the pool, there is the traffic increase. 46. Mr. Paul McCormick, La Quinta Resorts, stated this has been a resort for eight years. All the residents know the Resort is there. Public notifications were addressed to everyone within five hundred feet. Construction inconveniences are considered by themselves in regard to their guests. They believe they can keep the charm of La Quinta with these changes. It will not degrade the community. The noise study has been extensively studied. The issues with the berm on Eisenhower Drive that was referred to will be addressed. Their director has met with the City and they have received quotes to fix the area adding vegetation and decomposed granite. There is a potential acquisition of the Hotel; however, he is an employee of Hilton and not CNL and Hilton will continue to market the Hotel. The Hotel has many more resources to solve problems that CNL did not. In regard to property values, construction will have an affect. The elements they are constructing in the signature pool will enhance their guests stay. It does not have all the water park amenities and therefore is not a water park. Members and children will be allowed to use the pool if they are living at home and are under 23 years of age. In regard to police calls, there are more calls made in the neighborhoods by volume than at the Hotel. Every time they have received a call they do respond with a security follow-up. They have added additional security to address these problems. They try to be a good neighbor. In regard to lighting and landscaping issues, it will be low level lighting as compared to the tennis light that now exists. 47. Mr. Richard Zeilinga, Legal Counsel for La Quinta Resort, stated that with the threat of litigation it is important to make the record clear on some issues. With respect to the context DQ0612 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 important to note that there is a Resort, a commercial operation, that is on -going and has been on -going for 70 years and mixed in are residences that are a more recent vintage. This is a conflict and is very common where this is this type of mix. Why isn't there pro -active planning to deal with this issue? In this particular case, there was. He displayed portions of an Agreement that was for the residents at 49-454 Avenida Obregon. This Agreement talks about in great detail that the Hotel has the right to install any trees, landscaping or construct any improvements at any location within Tennis property which could be in near proximity to any lot within the project including the property. It also acknowledges that the buyer agrees that the seller makes no warranties, representations that the Tennis Club properties will be maintained and operated in the manner that existed or was contemplated at the time of purchase. It also states the buyer for himself, herself, or related parties hereby acknowledges the potential for nuisances created by or arising by the Hotel property including without limitation odors, noises, traffic, congestions and other nuisances arising from other operations, landscaping and maintenance of the Hotel property, early and late night events, etc., etc. The buyer assumes the risk of any creation of maintenance or trespass or nuisance created by or arising in connection with Hotel activities or any matters described above. This Agreement was signed by the buyer. This is a standard form agreement used for the purchase of new property. He cannot represent that when properties are resold that every buyer shared with subsequent buyers that they had executed this type of agreement. It does show the planning and pro -thought that went into dealing with the issues raised tonight. They contend based on the studies they prepared, there isn't a problem when you compare what was originally approved in the EIR on the project in 1975 and all the updates with the increases in units and the changes that have occurred since then. There have been five updates and the City has been involved in all the environmental updates since then. In regard to the noticing, not only did the City notice the area within 500 feet they are required to, it was sent out to the entire boundary of the Resort property. This is above and beyond what is required. In regard to noise, there were three areas that were studied. The study is overly conservative because when the study was completed, all of those factors and changes made in regard to the concerns raised by the neighbors, are not assumed in the study. 613 study did not assume that all these slides would be close or ' Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 open, or that the mass had been split and brought down. The study did not consider the lazy river was lowered to reduce the noise impact. On traffic as there are no Hotel room increases, they did not believe hard quantitative counts were necessary, but they did it anyway and on parking and capacity, there is excessive capacity. He presented a photo taking of the parking area at 100% occupancy at 5:00 p.m. which showed no excessive parking. In regard to the Morgan House issue, the existing context is not a pristine context. The Morgan House is totally screened with an eight foot wall, and hedge. In regard to views they are not a significant impact by law. Finally, the City did not prepare a Negative Declaration, it prepared an Addendum to an EIR. This is an update to an existing EIR. 48. There being no further public comment Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. 49. Commissioner Alderson applauded Mr. McCormick's effort to take care of the landscape issues on Avenida Obregon. He recognizes not everyone is going to be happy. He had reviewed over 600 letters in regard to this project and a lot of consideration has been given to this project. The concerns raised are important and legal ramifications are important. He stands by staff and legal counsel in that the City is within its rights to review and act on this application, but he believes we are putting in jeopardy this grand Hotel of La Quinta. The business plan says it is a financially viable plan. If this were not successful the fall back is dire and it would cost the owners millions. It is an exchange of recreational uses. Taking it all into consideration, is it good for La Quinta? At this point he is not sure he could support the project. 50. Commissioner Barrows stated she would consider continuing the application. In looking at the conditions they relate to the physical aspect of the project. She asked if the park would be used from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Staff clarified that was the time the applicant stated the park would be open. Commissioner Barrows asked if there was a more minimal use discussed with the applicant as this appears to be the high end of the use. Staff stated discussions were not held on alternatives. Commissioner Barrows stated she too has seen the transition of the Hotel, and she would like to seens®r(M 14 alternatives to the current design. UU Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 51. Commissioner Engle stated he too believes this issue needs to be resolved at this meeting. Everyone is opposed to change, but he supports this project. People are coming and putting their money back into the community. The issue of the landscaping maintenance along Eisenhower Drive, however needs to be resolved and strong code enforcement needs to be in place to see that it does not happen again. He believes it is a good project. 52. Chairman Quill stated he appreciates everyone who came out to voice their opinion. He too has been a resident for a long time and has seen the transition of this Hotel. However, he believes not only does the Hotel have the right to change, but it has the obligation to do so. It is important to allow it to grow. If it fails, they have the right to tear it down and try something different; and this is their right. The development of the City and the golf communities around the Hotel were developed as a result of the Hotel. In regard to this, conditions need to be added to address security and over parking concerns. The berm along Eisenhower Drive needs to be addressed and a full landscape design submitted for approval. From an operation perspective Eisenhower Drive and the bike path should be addressed. A specific written operating plan for the parking lot and security should be added as a condition to be approved by the City. This will be a beautiful plan and the impacts will not be significant. 53. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-007 recommending certification of an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR No. 41), and subsequent CEQA compliance documents, for La Quinta Cove Golf Club revised Specific Plan 121-E (1975), as amended, prepared for Site Development Permit 2006-865, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. 54. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Chairman Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-008 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865, as recommended and amended: 000615 Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 2007 a. Condition added: A written operations plan related to the pool and Avenida Fernando for security for parking shall be submitted and approved by staff. b. Condition added: A landscaping plan for Eisenhower Drive and the bike path to the maintenance facility shall be submitted and approved by staff. C. Condition added: The landscaping on top of the rock mountains features shall be restricted to a height limit. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Engle and Chairman Quill. NOES: Commissioners Alderson and Barrows. ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels. ABSTAIN: None. The motion failed. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the policy of the City is that in a tie vote, the application is automatically a continuance. The missing member would be required to listen to a recording of the meeting and review all the material prepared and submitted. The options before the Commission are to continue the matter and allow the missing member to vote, or send the application to the City Council with the vote as taken. Discussion followed regarding the options before the Commission. 55. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Engle to adopt Minute Motion 2007-move the application forward to the Council with the vote as taken and with the added conditions. Unanimously approved. Chairman Quill recessed the meeting at 11 :04 p.m. and reconvened at 11:09 p.m. B. Site Development Permit 2006-874; a request of Komar Investments, L.L.C. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for seven commercial buildings, for the property located south of Highway 1 1 1 at Depot Drive. 1. Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Les Johnson presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 00Of)16 ATTACHMENT #10 GURALNICK & GILLILAND, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ATTORNEYS SERVING 74-399 HIGHWAY 111, SUITE M COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE: (760) 340-1515 FACSIMILE:(760) 568-3053 E-MAIL: MarieM@GGHOALAW'.COM PLEASE REFER TO FILE 111 February 12, 2007 via facsimile and email Planning Commission City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA and Doug Evans, Planning Director City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA Re: Environmental Assessment No. 2006-573, Site Development Permit 2006-865 Applicant: CNL Desert Resorts L.P. for the La Quinta Resort Dear Commissioners: The residential communities of La Quinta Tennis Villas Homeowners Association, Santa Rosa Cove Homeowners Association dba The Enclave, The Enclave Mountain Estates Homeowners Association, and Los Estados at Santa Rosa Cove Homeowners Association are all adjacent to the La Quinta Resort and will be negatively impacted by the water park project. The applicant has attempted to minimize the overall negative impact of this project by characterizing it as a "Signature Pool": "The proposed project is designed as a private gated recreational amenity for use by hotel guests of the La Quinta Resort, as well as La Quinta Resort club members and their families. The proposed project wA/0 Q 617 not be open to the general public and is not intended to function as a theme park or Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 2 public water slide park." (Addendum to Environmental Assessment prepared by Impact Sciences, January 2007, p. 13 [hereinafter, "Addendum"]) The truth is that this facility, which involves two artificial water -slide mountains with splashdown pool for three slides, wave pool, lazy river, formal outdoor pool, private pool -side cabanas, children's outdoor play area and pool, game room, indoor and outdoor dining areas, and lounge deck, staffed with 48 people including 19 lifeguards, 8 pool attendants, 15 servers/bartenders, 1 manager, 1 assistant manager and 3 dedicated engineering/maintenance workers, which 3,100 hotel guests, Citrus Club members and their families and eligible children, are entitled to use, with an estimated full capacity of 1,100 persons, can only be called a water park. The applicant can't have it both ways - if they intend to offer the amenity to hotel guests and Club members they have to presume it will fulfil its intended function of attracting the maximum number of people to use the new facilities. There is no precedent for inserting such an intensive, inappropriate, noisy and unattractive amusement -park type facility in immediate proximity to the serenity of the surrounding residential neighborhoods, many of whose homes are worth millions of dollars and who purchased their homes in this neighborhood specifically because of the quiet and unique environment of this special part of La Quinta. The "competitor" hotels cited by the applicant, the Westin Mission Hills Resort, Hyatt Grand Champion Resort, and Rancho Las Palmas Resort all have facilities which are isolated from any immediately surrounding residences. The nearest comparison is the Knotts Water Park in Palm Springs, which is located in an industrial zone, and has no impact on any surrounding residential area. In contrast, the proposed water park at the La Quinta Resort is simply an inappropriate use in relation to the surrounding residential neighborhood. The sheer number of guests and Club members entitled to use this facility make it "public" for all intents and purposes as to its impact on the community. The City should deny the Site Development Permit and direct the applicant to work further with the affected communities to arrive at a fresh concept for the pool and tennis court area that does not create substantial negative impacts. 000618 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 3 1. THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS BASED UPON A LACK OF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. In determining whether to prepare a negative declaration or an EIR, that decision must be based upon "substantial evidence." "Substantial evidence includes fact, a reasonable assumption predicated upon fact, or expert opinion supported by fact. Substantial evidence is not argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence that is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence of social or economic impacts that do not contribute to or are not caused by physical impacts on the environment." (Pub. Res. Code Section 21080(e)(1),(e)(2). "Substantial evidence ... is enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might be reached.... Substantial evidence shall include facts, reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported by facts." (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15384(a),(b).) As discussed, much of the data supplied by the applicant in its noise and traffic studies are based upon unreasonable assumptions, not facts or realistic assumptions based upon facts. As such there is no substantial evidence supporting the City's recommendation to adopt a negative declaration for the project. 2. HISTORICAL RESOURCES Although the City of La Quinta General Plan of 1992 lists the La Quinta Resort as a site of historic significance, and the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 7.06 et seq.) provides for the City through its Historic Preservation Commission to designate historically important sites such as the La Quinta Resort as a historic resource, to date this step has not formally been taken. However, the Morgan House, which is an important historic adobe structure, is planned to be fully integrated into the water park project. The Morgan House has previously been determined to be eligible to be designated as a historic resource under the criterion of both the California Register of Historic Resources and the National Register of Historic Places. As such, the Morgan 000619 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 4 House is considered an historical resource due to its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register. (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(a)(1), League for Protection of Oakland's Architectural and Historical Resources v City of Oakland (V Dist. 1997) 52 Cal.AppAth 896, 905, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 821). Therefore, under CEQA, the Morgan House is considered a "historical resource." The site development plan proposes to obliterate the existing setting of the Morgan House by bringing it to within steps of the "lazy river" and by building a new pop-up fountain, toddler pool and play area immediately to the south of the Morgan House. (L-1-1.02) This modification of the existing setting and context of the Morgan House is a substantial adverse change in the significance of the Morgan House as a historical resource. The June 2006 report, Evaluation of Adobes at LA Quinta Resort," by Architectural Resources Group, points out that the setting of the Morgan House has already been permitted over time to be significantly degraded by previous hotel expansion and construction. As such, that report evaluates the current integrity of the Morgan House's setting as only "fair." Furthermore, the report notes that the "feeling" of the Morgan House as its expression of its aesthetic or historical sense of a particular period of time has been diminished by changes to the setting. The integrity of a setting involves an evaluation of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. (Evaluation of Adobes at La Quinta Resort, p. 10) Demonstrating the existence of integrity in the historic structure is key to inclusion in the California Register and the National Register. CEQA requires the preparation of an EIR whenever a project may cause a substantial adverse change in significance of an historical resource. (Pub. Resources Code Section 21084.1, CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(b) CEQA Guidelines define "substantial change in the significance of an historical resource"to mean the physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired." The project proposes to entirely remove any remaining vestiges of site integrity of the Morgan House, surrounding it with an inappropriate Disneyland-esque variety 00 0 0 �9 0 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 5 children's water -play amenities. The project clearly creates a substantial adverse change in the significance of the Morgan House as a historical resource. The La Quinta Municipal Code - Historic Preservation Ordinance provides: "Alteration means any change or modification, through public or private action, of any historic resource or of any property located within a historic district, including, but not limited to, exterior changes to or modifications of a structure or any of its architectural details or visual characteristics, including paint color and surface texture, grading, surface paving, new structures, cutting or removal of trees and other natural features, disturbances of archaeological sites or areas, and the placement or removal of any objects such as signs, plaques, light fixtures; street furniture, walls, fences, steps, plantings and landscape accessories affecting the historic qualities of the property." The La Quinta Municipal Code - Historic Preservation Ordinance provides as follows as to criterion for development of a historic property: "in the case of construction of a new improvement, upon a historic site, that the exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible with the external appearance of existing historically designated improvements in said site." The City's historic preservation ordinance would require that development of the site surrounding the Morgan House would require that the project be compatible with the existing historical resources. The intrusion of the children's pool and play areas upon the site of the Morgan house is not compatible with its historic nature and context. The significant impacts of a discretionary project upon an historic building must be considered in preparing an EIR. (League for Protection, supra, 52 Cal.AppAth at 906.) After identifying the significant impact, here, the destruction of any remaining site integrity, "the lead agency shall identify potentially feasible measures to mitigate 000621 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 6 significant adverse changes in the significance of an historical resource. The lead agency shall ensure that any adopted measures to mitigate or avoid significant adverse changes are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements or other measures." (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(b)(4)) The only way to mitigate the negative impact of the destruction of the existing setting of the Morgan House is to eliminate the entire portion of the proposal that alters the immediate surroundings of the building. However, any attempt by the applicant to propose moving the children's pool and playground facilities to another portion of the site presents an additional noise impact. Noise impacts are discussed below. 3. NOISE The applicant estimates maximum occupancy of the pool and poolside area to be 1,100 people. Applicant estimates approximately 50 % of these will be in the Active Pool area (wave pool, slide mountain/splashdown pool, and lazy river), and 50 % of those are estimated to be children; 25% will use the Children's Play area, and 75% of those will be children. There is no way of knowing if these estimates are accurate. Given applicant's numbers, the actual number of persons who are entitled to use the facility at any given time can be estimated as 3,100 conservatively.' The noise impacts of the project are of great concern. Currently the site contains tennis courts and a pool. These areas currently enjoy light use causing relatively little noise disturbance to neighbors. Yet the applicant claims that "the expected change in operation will not result in a significant increase to any of the adjacent residences." ' There are currently 862 memberships entitled to use the resort facilities, including the water park. Since memberships allow the member's entire family to use the facilities, conservatively 1900 persons are entitled to use the water park from among the club members (each member has a spouse, and 1/4 have at least one child under 23 entitled to use the facilities). There are 800 guest rooms. All hotel guests are entitled to use the water park. Conservatively this means that at full capacity at least 1200 hotel guests will be on the property with the ability to use the water park, with all rooms full, and half occupied by at least 2 gues@ O 0 6 2 2 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 7 (Veneklasen Acoustical Analysis Report, Jan. 8, 2007, p. 9) The assumptions used in the applicant's noise study to evaluate the projected/expected noise levels was "adult typical conversational /eve/" and "child slightly elevated voice." (Table 4, Veneklasen Acoustical Analysis Report, Jan. 8, 2007, p. 7) The distinct impression left by the applicant's noise study is that the new water park will be used by a maximum of 1,100 people, approximately half of which will be children, and who all will be enjoying this exciting facility in near silence. Although the existing site, which is serene and very quiet throughout the day, already is near the City's noise ordinance level of 60 decibels, the applicant claims that the new noises created by the water park will not appreciably increase the existing noise levels. It is inconceivable that the water park, when used at anywhere near capacity, will not significantly increase noise levels. (Our substantive criticisms of the applicant's Veneklasen Acoustical Analysis Report of January 8, 2007 is attached ["Wieland and Associates Review of the Veneklasen Report dated February 12, 2007"]) The Veneklasen report fails to include any data relevant to measuring the sound of frequent or constant children's screaming or adults shouting, which is very likely to occur at the water park, or the constant noise of people splashing into the pool from the slide mountain, or the constant noise of the waves crashing in the wave pool. Using the level of cocktail party chatter or children quietly playing, which is what Veneklasen admits they have done, is a completely unrealistic speculation of the sort of noise that the water park will in fact generate. Further, the Veneklasen Acoustical Analysis Report significantly fails to provide any data whatsoever about the following types of noise, that will be heard throughout the day: (1) the splashdown impact of users of the water slides plunging into the splashdown pool; and (2) the constant noise generated by the noise of the waves generated by the wave pool itself rather than its equipment which is housed underground. These sorts of noises are best characterized as "impact" noise. The applicant's noise study reports that existing ambient levels of noise are 0 0 C 0 2 3 approximately 57 - 60 decibels throughout the day. (Table 1, Veneklasen Acoustical Analysis Report, Jan. 8, 2007 p. 6.) These noise levels were measured at locations Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 8 which are adjacent to the La Quinta Tennis Villas residences and therefore reflect the ambient noise levels at the Tennis Villas. Yet the applicant claims that the overall increase in ambient noise from all pool activity plus mechanical equipment noise "will not be substantial." (Veneklasen Acoustical Analysis Report, January 8, 2007, p. 9) This appears to be wishful thinking based upon assumptions that the users will be remarkably silent in enjoying the water park. However, under the project proposal, the "action pool" concept incorporating the wave pool, lazy river, children's play area and water -slide mountain are certain to greatly increase ambient noise. The water park by design is intended to greatly increase the use of the pool facilities at the hotel. That is its purpose. The City's noise ordinance limits noise emanating from a source to a receiving residential area to be not higher than 60 db between 7 am -10:00 pm, and 50 db between 10 pm and 7 am. (LQ Ordinance, Noise Control, 9.100.210) If the existing ambient sound exceeds these levels, no condition will be permitted to cause an increase in noise above ambient levels. Further, impact noise, speech or music requires a 5 db decrease in the noise levels. Much of the noise that will be generated from the water park project will be speech (guests talking, laughing, children shrieking), or impacts (people hitting the pool from the plunge slide), or possibly music at the pool. Yet, the applicant's study improperly bases its findings on an assumption that the noise that will be occurring is simply people talking and children slightly elevating their voices. The applicant also proposes that a "a ground mounted speaker and music system will be utilized throughout the facility." This appears to be a new use for which no information is provided as to the potential noise impact of projected music either during the day or in the evening during the "special events such as receptions, dinners, and meetings in conjunction with conference guests." Although there is reference to an existing music system, no comparison information is given as to how the new systemO M-9- 4 will be different. (Staff Report, p. 4) Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 9 The significance of an activity may vary with the setting. (CEQA Guidelines 15064(b).) The noise level which may be anticipated by the "action pool' when fully utilized would possibly be insignificant at a resort hotel property which was located in an isolated or hotel -zone setting. For example, the Grand Wailea in Maui, a similar project to the proposed water park by the same design firm CNL Resorts, is located in a resort hotel zone on the beach. No residences are impacted by the noise generated by the Grand Wailea pool facilities. However, the La Quinta Resort is uniquely situated as an intimate neighbor in a peaceful residential neighborhood in which tranquility is at a premium. Neighbors of the La Quinta Resort already are disturbed by noise from the pool and tennis court areas from time to time. The projected noise impacts from the "action pool' will definitely create a permanent increase in ambient noise surrounding the site, particularly for the residents which are immediately adjacent to the project site. The clear negative impacts from noise generated by this project indicates that a full EIR is necessary. (Oro Fino Gold Mining Corp. v. County of Ei Dorado (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 872, 881-882, 274 Cal.Rptr. 720 [requirement that project comply with a noise ordinance does not insulate'a project from EIR review where it can be fairly argued that the project will have a significant impact on ambient noise levels]; CEQA Guidelines, Appen. G, § XI, subd. (d) [local agency should consider whether the project will result in "[a] substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project'].) In summary, the "action pool" is likely to result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity, above levels existing without the project, and in violation of existing noise levels mandated by La Quinta Ordinance. There does not appear to be any realistic way of mitigating the additional noise as it results from the nature of the project as a whole. The applicant also proposes to use the mountain adjacent to the wave pool to project "evening summer movies." (Staff Report, p. 6) This would indicate that the applicant, while closing the water park to swimming after 6 p.m., intends to use the site for other noise -generating activities such as movies. There is no information 0 0 0 G 2 5) Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 10 whatsoever in the Veneklasen noise report about the noise impacts of projecting movies at a location which is 62 feet from the nearest Tennis Villa. Obviously, the applicant has not been completely candid about all of the uses of this area that will generate noise after 6:00 p.m. Additionally, the applicant has not attempted to provide any information as to whether the general pool deck area is expected to have an increased use for outdoor parties and events in the evening, over and above the existing uses in the area. If the project is approved, we are requesting, as recommended by RK Engineering's Report of Traffic and Acoustical Analysis dated Feb. 7, 2007, that a strict noise monitoring program be implemented to ensure that at all times, the project is in compliance with the existing noise ordinances, and that it be a condition of approval that the water park be closed when the noise level exceeds City limits. 4. TRAFFIC IMPACTS The traffic impact analysis states, "use of the water feature will be limited to hotel guests staying at the La Quinta Resort Hotel and a select number of individuals who participate in the exclusive Club Membership Program associated with the La Quinta Resort & Club." In fact, with 800 hotel rooms and 862 existing memberships, 1,662 cars could potentially be using cars to make trips to the Hotel to use the water park. The Traffic Impact Analysis makes the assumption that Club Members are not likely to use the water park very much: "For the most part, the number of occupied guest rooms will determine the number of trips that will be generated by the resort and also establish the demand for off-street hotel parking." (Traffic Impact Study, p. 10) The hotel already experiences near peak occupancy during the winter -early spring season and therefore, additional vehicle trips can be generated by Club members traveling to use the new water park. It is claimed that demand for the water park will be "relatively small during the winter months." This is sheer speculation without any foundation. Therefore, the Traffic Impact Study concludes that "the water 000626 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 11 feature may not increase peak club member usage appreciably, even without restrictions on club member access to the water feature." (Traffic Impact Study, p. 11) This is simply wishful thinking. It is admitted that gold, tennis, spa and other club amenities are high during the "season". There is no reason to assume that Club members will neglect to use the new water park amenities. The average temperatures in the "season" are in the 70s and 80s. (See Average Monthly Temperatures for La Quinta, CA from Weather.com) The Traffic Impact Study admits that during the season, "the Hotel operates near its full occupancy with very few off-street parking spaces unoccupied. As a result, the number of parking spaces available in the peak season which could be used by club members who wish to visit the water feature is limited." In short, there is no available parking for Club members who intend to use the water park during the season. The Traffic Impact Study optimistically projects that "Club member traffic to/from the water feature in the winter or early spring, when traffic volumes are typically at their peak in La Quinta, could be limited by the cooler weather and the age of the club members (which averages 55+) and their families." This assumption is again without any realistic foundation - the applicant wishes to preserve the water park for use by Club members but wishes the City to believe that in the high season, it is too cold, and their members too old, to use it! Of course Club members' families can use the facilities and presumably would do so. The letter from Paul McCormick, attachment 5 to the Staff Report, attempting to justify the non-use of the water park by Club members, is not based upon anything other than the unrealistic expectation that Club members, because they historically have not used what is apparently an under -used existing pool, won't use the water park. The argument that the Club members will not use the water park because of their demographic is not supported by anything other than the applicant's belief" that they would only have a "nominal effect on the usage of the Pool." (Letter from Paul McCormick dated January 11, 2007, Attachment 5 to Staff Report) The Traffic Study also claims that the Club members won't be using the water park in the summer, either! `The potential for significant traffic impacts as a result of WO 0 6 2 7 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 12 limited number of Club members who will utilize the water feature in the summer months should be low." The "Traffic Impact Analysis" simply relies upon wishful thinking rather than any real analysis of the impacts of use by Club members of these facilities. This sort of speculation cannot be the basis for a realistic traffic impact study under CEQA. Avenida Obregon is the main access to both cars and pedestrians to the proposed "action pool" facility and is already grossly overused by pedestrians and is hugely prone to illegal parking. (See Photos by Fredericks). Avenida Obregon is completely insufficient to handle additional cars or pedestrians to access the new pool facilities. The proposal to ultimately gate Avenida Obregon is a possible solution, and should not be considered a last resort as the applicant presents it. The opponents' traffic engineer, RK Engineering, has stated that overall, the Traffic Impact Analysis of Indo Engineering is inadequate because it makes no effort to assess the current capacities of either the streets or parking associated with the project, making it impossible to determine whether incremental increases in traffic and parking can, or cannot, be handled. Further, the opponents' traffic engineer states that there is no basis to assume that the traffic impacts of the water park would not be increased during the winter season, simply because the Hotel is already operating largely at peak occupancy during much of that period. (RK Engineering Review of Indo Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis, Feb. 5, 2007) Clearly the Negative Declaration is based upon a lack of data about the realistic, as opposed to unfounded, estimates of the true traffic impacts of the water park. A. Construction Parking: We strongly object to placing the construction staging area in the Palm Grove parcel. This area is immediately adjacent to the Tennis Villas, and will require construction vehicles to constantly enter and exist Avenida Fernando, which will greatly disturb both the Tennis Villas and the Enclave. The Traffic Impact Analysis admits that "Short-term construction -related traffic will be noticeable to resort guests and nearby 000628 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 13 residents who utilize Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon for access tolfrom their homes." (Indo Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis January 8, 2007 p. 6) There is no support given for the statement that "The roadways surrounding the La Quinta Resort, including both Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon, have the available capacity to serve the level of additional traffic anticipated during the construction process." The applicant must locate the construction staging area in another location so as not to disturb the residents. 5 AESTHETICS The project includes a two artificial mountains - one 28 foot tall and another 18.5 feet tall, enclosing three (3) water slides into a "splash down pool," located at the western boundary of the site. At its closest, the mountain will be 14 feet from the closest Tennis Villa. The mountain will have a substantial adverse impact on scenic vistas from the perspective of Tennis Villas homes. Currently the Tennis Villas enjoy unimpeded views over the tennis courts and to the surrounding mountains. The mountain will substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The existing Hotel facilities include historically appropriate hotel rooms and resort villas, which incorporate many design features of the historic buildings such as Morgan House. The La Quinta Resort is also known for its lovely landscape. Previously the City has assured that expansions of the Hotel's site have maintained the proper aesthetic relationship with the historic properties of this special property. (See Addendum to Environmental Assessment 97-343, p. 40[addition of spa, fitness center and residential units.]) There is no relation whatsoever aesthetically between the harmonious and historically appropriate style of the existing facilities and the Disneyland-esque water park being proposed, in particular the artificial mountains to enclose the water slides. 000629 Guralnick & Gilliland LLP February 12, 2007 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: EA 2006-573;Site Dev. Permit 2006-865 page 14 Additionally, the pool facility creates a new source of substantial light or glare which could adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Proposed conditions of approval limit nighttime lighting of the project; however, the residents are concerned that for nighttime functions and general project lighting will create light pollution for the residents nearest to the project. Eliminating or dramatically reducing the height of the proposed "mountain" is the only way to mitigate this impact. CONCLUSION The site development plan for the water park presents a threat of significant environmental effects in the area of historical resources, noise, aesthetics and traffic impacts. The reports which purport to support a negative declaration in fact are based upon wishful thinking and unreasonable assumptions on the applicant's part. As such, an EIR should be prepared. Alternatively, substantial mitigation measures must be adopted to eliminate negative impacts upon noise, traffic, view, and historical resources, possibly by eliminating the artificial mountains and water slides, eliminating the wave pool, and re -orienting the site to move the noisiest impacts away from the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Sincerely, Guralnick&Gilliland LLP /. I) ( � Marie A. Mack Attorneys for La Quinta Tennis Villas Homeowners Association, Santa Rosa Cove Homeowners Association dba The Enclave, The Enclave Mountain Estates Homeowners Association, and Los Estados at Santa Rosa Cove Homeowners Association 000630 Wedding Planner - Set the Date, Average Monthly for La Quetta, uA Fast I VI Welcome. Lo alai a�d&k I Put�[e3Lnsi9 desktgJ2 C —ther som ISign -In Local weather Enter zip or US/Intl city FG-Q1 Bringing weather to life Maps I Video I News I _TY I Mobile I Alerts Home In Season Plan AheadMy Neighborhood Travel Smart Stay Heakhy Around the Home Get Out 8 Play Plan Ahead:_ Wedding Planner > Set the Date > Monthly Averages for La Quinta, CA Average Monthly Temperature for Try another location La Quetta, CA (92253) Show: CITemperature hi Precipitation Compare two locations Legend: Average High (°F) IAverage Low (°F) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Select a month to see daily averages 107 1➢6 107 102 94 92 07 01 70 70 00 73 )1 6 )2 ]2 65 62 59 52 40 n <2 41 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Weather At -a -Glance: On Average: • July is the warmest month. • December is the coolest month. • January is the wettest month. • June is the driest month. • August has the most clear days. • December has the most cloudy days Records: • The highest recorded temperature was 123°F in June of 1970. • The lowest recorded temperature was 13°F in January of 1937. Important tips for: WOutdoor Wed�inys De5trimAtionMeddings After you set the date, move on to the next steps ... VQ Y Track the Weather Focus on the_Dgtails Plan Y2ur_Honey_moon .Will It rain on your From the food to the The wedding may be wedding day? Track Flowers, it's never too over but the celebration $510,000 Mortgage for $1,698/mo! Mortgage Rates Near 40-yr Lows! Click Your State Bad Alabama Credit Click Yoty Fate OK L.,My9lgso.. 3 00% - 3 99 % 000631, http://www.weather.com/outlook/events/weddings/setthedate/month/Avemop/lIRCAnS7n7f 2/l7PJnn7 Wieland Associates, Inc. WA Acoustical Consultants February 12, 2007 Ms. Marie Mack Guralnick & Gilliland, LLP 74-399 Highway I 11, Suite M Palm Desert, CA 92260 Project File 897-07 Subject: Review of Environmental Documents Prepared for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool Project in La Quinta Reference: Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool (Site Development Permit 2006- 865). Impact Sciences, Inc. January 2007. Dear Ms. Mack, As requested, we have reviewed the referenced report with regard to the accuracy and adequacy of the acoustical analysis. The following provides our comments, beginning with Appendix D (Operational Acoustics Study) of the report, and concluding with Section XI (Noise) of the report. Appendix D (Operational Acoustics Study) 1. Section 4.0, page 4. The text states that the Children's Play area has been excluded from the study because the functions won't change from the area's current use. However, the area should have been analyzed because (a) it's an entirely new use; (b) it's in a new location; (c) it's specifically designed for the use of children, who are typically noisier than adults. 2. Section 4, page 4. The text does not identify oAer noise sources that should have been considered, including the new outdoor dining terraces, game room, and arrival plaza. The text also does not state whether there will be a public address or outdoor music system in the area. 3. Section 5, page 4. The text states that the City's noise standard applies a 5 dB penalty for noise that "consists entirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech or music, or any combination thereof" The text goes on to state that this penalty does not apply to the project because the noise is not entirely speech (since mechanical equipment has been considered). However, this is disingenuous since the analysis clearly indicates in Table 7 that the noise from pool activities (i.e., speech) is so dominant that mechanical equipment noise can be dismissed. Therefore, the 5 dB penalty should be applied to the project, resulting in a daytime standard of 55 dB(A) at the residential property lines. 4. Section 6.1, page 5. The analysis of maximum occupancy isn't clear. The assumed maximum occupancy of 1,100 people is about half of the stated design load of the Signature Pool project (i.e., 1,390 bathers + 793 lounge chairs = design load of 2,183). 2691 Richter Avenue, Suite 107 Tel: (949) 474 1222 Irvine, CA 92606 www.wietandassoc.com Fax: (949) 474 912Z FINAL WAk Wieland Associates, Inc. La Quinta Signature Pool 5. Section 6.1, page 5. It isn't clear why Veneklasen Associates had to assume occupancy percentages for the Active Pool area and Children's Pool area when CNL Hotels & Resorts was able to provide the same information for the Formal Pool Area. Have these percentages been verified by CNL Hotels & Resorts? 6. Section 6.1, page 5. What is the Active Pool Area? Assuming this refers to the combined Splash Down Pool area, Lazy River, and Wave Pool area, how is the assumed occupancy percentage of 53% divided among these three uses? 7. Section 6.1, page 5. What is the basis for assuming that only 50% of the occupants in the Active Pool area will be children? A higher percentage would seem to be more appropriate since the areas would seem to be specifically designed to entertain children. 8. Section 6. L page 6. The text states an assumption that 25% of the adults will be speaking at a conversational level. What is assumed for the remaining 75%? It would appear from the analysis that it is assumed that these adults will not be making any noise. 9. Section 6.1, page 6. The text states an assumption that 50% of the children will be speaking at a slightly elevated level. What is assumed for the remaining 50%? It would appear from the analysis that it is assumed that these children will not be making any noise. What assumptions have been made about the percentage of children shrieking and shouting, as typically occurs in such an environment? 10. Section 7.0, page 6. In Table 1, it isn't clear why ambient Legl noise levels are presented. The City's standards are not presented in terms of Leq, but in terms of L2, L8, L25, L50 and Lmax noise level S2. These should have been presented in the table, not Leq. 11. Section 7.0, page 6. The purpose of ambient noise measurement positions 02 and 03 isn't clear. Both are in the middle of existing tennis court areas. Why were no ambient measurements obtained at the nearest residences south of the Splash Down Pool area, and east of the project site across Avenida Obregon? 12. Section 7.0, page 6. There does not appear to be any basis for assuming that the ambient noise level measured at Location 1 in Figure I is applicable to Location 3 in Figure 2. Nor does there appear to be any basis for assuming that this application is more stringent since the Ln values necessary to make such an assumption have not been provided. 13. Section 7.0, page 6. No data sheets have been provided to identify the measurement data, equipment and procedures. 14, Section 8.0, page 7. No parameters or calculations have been provided to verify the analysis of mechanical equipment noise levels. Leq is the equivalent, or average, noise level during a measurement period. Ln is the noise level exceeded for more than n% of the time during the measurement period. Thus, L2 is the noise level exceeded for more than 2% of the time, or for more than 1 minute in a 1-hour period. Similarly, L8 is the noise level exceeded for more than 5 minutes in an hour, L25 is the noise level exceeded for more than 15 minutes in an hour, and L50 is the noise level exceeded for more than 30 minutes in an hour. Lmax is the maximum noise level measured. GURALNICK a GILLILAND, LLP 2 Project File 897-07 February 12, 2qU O d1 6 3 3 FINAL WA Wieland Associates, Inc. La Quinta Signature Pool 15. Section 8.0, page 7. The ISO 9613 standard is only applicable to the analysis of outdoor noise sources. What methodology was used to estimate noise levels from the mechanical equipment housed in structures? Noise from inside structures can propagate to the nearby residential communities through vents, doors, and other openings. 16. Section 8.0, page 7. Table 2 presents calculations and assesses impacts relative to the Leq noise metric. As stated in Comment #9, Leq is not relevant to the City's noise ordinance standards. 17. Section 8.1, page 7. No parameters or calculations have been provided to verify the analysis of operational noise levels. 18. Section 8.1, page 7. What is the basis for assuming that noise levels measured at cocktail parties and playgrounds are applicable to a water park? Why weren't actual noise levels measured at existing, similar facilities? 19, Section 8.1, pages 7 and 8. The analysis of operational noise is based on sound power levels. What procedure was used to convert these sound power levels to the L2, L8, L25, L50 and Lmax metrics used in the City's noise ordinance? 20. Section 8.1, pages 7 and 8. What assumptions have been made to account for the noise levels produced by children shrieking and shouting, as typically occurs in such an environment? It would not appear to be reasonable to assume that children using a wave pool or a water slide would only speak in a slightly elevated voice. 21. Section 8.1, page 8. Table 6 presents pool activity levels in terms of Leq, but Table 5 presents the same levels in terms of L50. What is the basis for assuming that Leq equals L50? 22. Section 8.1, page 8. It does not appear that the following have been considered in the analysis of operational noise levels: (a) people (primarily children) talking, shrieking and shouting at the top of the water slides; (b) water splashing from play activities, water slides and waterfalls; (c) waves "crashing" at the Wave Pool; (d) activities at the Entry Plaza area; (e) activities in the game room; and (t) activities at the outdoor dining terraces. 23. Section 8.2, page 9. Table 7 apparently mixes Leq and L50 noise levels in the calculations. What is the basis for assuming that Leq equals L50? 24. Section 9.0, page 9. The text states that an increase of 5 dB is typically noticeable but not significant. Most communities consider an increase of 3-5 dB to be the level at which a significant impact occurs. Since the analysis indicates that the project will increase noise levels by 6 dB, this should be considered a significant impact. 25. Section 9.0, page 9. The text states that an increase of 10 dB is considered to be twice as loud. This is generally only true when a single noise source (such as traffic) increases by 10 dB. The noise sources that will be produced by the Signature Pool project are quite different from the ambient sources in the area; therefore, it cannot be said that an increase of 10 dB will be perceived as being twice as loud. GURALNICK it GILLILAND, LLP �j [� M'j Project File 897-07 February 12 O G J WA Wieland Associates, Inc. FINAL La Quinta Signature Pool Section XI, Noise. 1. Page 49, 3rd paragraph. The text indicates that a 5 dB change typically causes a change in community reaction. This appears to conflict with Appendix D, Section 9, page 9 which states that a 5 dB change is not significant. 2. Page 51, 1" paragraph. The text states that the acoustical report of Appendix D found a minimal increase in noise from the use of the pool. However, the acoustical report identifies a 6 dB increase from the use of the pool, which Section XI, page 49, 3`a paragraph indicates is sufficient change to cause a community reaction. This would not appear to be a minimal increase based on the report's own criteria. 3. Page 51, 1" paragraph. The text states that the acoustical report of Appendix D finds a minimal increase in the noise from the use of the pool when compared with the noise from the existing tennis courts. The acoustical report makes no such comparison and provides no analysis of tennis court noise levels. Thank you for this opportunity to provide you with acoustical consulting services. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call us at 949/474-1222. Sincerely, WIELAND ASSOCIATES, INC 5 Pavideland Principal Consultant GURALNICK a GILLILAND, LLP 4 Project File 897-07 Febwary 12, 2007 000635 David L. Wieland, Principal Consultant Wieland Associates, Inc. 2691 Richter Avenue 4 Suite 107 4 Irvine, CA 92606 Phone 949/474 1222 4 Fax 949/474 9122 4 email DWieland@wielandmsoccom 4 www wielandassoc.com AFFILIATIONS Member, National Council of Acoustical Consultants (NCAC) Member, Institute of Noise Control Engineering (INCE) Member, Acoustical Society of America (ASA) Member, California Chapter, American Planning Association (CCAPA) EDUCATION & CREDENTIALS Bachelor of Science in Physics (Cum Laude), University of Southern California Certified Acoustical Consultant, San Diego County, California EXPERIENCE 26 years' extensive experience on hundreds of projects involving building noise insulation, community noise, transportation and industrial noise, and environmental impact reports. Project responsibilities include managing projects; conducting noise measurement surveys; developing noise contours; analyzing data; assessing impacts relative to local, state and federal standards; developing noise control recommendations and specifications; developing software for several noise analysis applications including equipment sound power level testing. Reports have been approved by local, state and Federal agencies. CAREER HIGHLIGHTS Preparation of 27 Noise Elements of the General Plan; Principal Engineer on 24 freeway soundwall noise studies located in California and Arizona; Principal Engineer on several hundred residential and commercial/industrial projects in Califomia, Arizona, Nevada and Mexico; Principal Engineer for the Superconducting Supercollider Project preliminary noise assessment in Texas; provided litigation support/expert witness assistance in over 30 construction defect cases located in California and Nevada; reviewer of other consultants' work for several municipalities. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT AREAS Experience in each of the following areas of acoustics applications (a summery listing of the work performed within each category is available upon request): Aircraft and Helicopter Noise Studies Bars and Restaurants Commercial/Industrial Noise Control Emergency Generators Freeway Noise Studies GeneraUSpecific Plans Gymnasiums/Multi-Use Rooms Hotels and Motels Litigation Support/Expert Witness Mechanical Equipment Mining -Related Operations Noise Elements of the General Plan Noise Ordinance Enforcement ra+ Oil Related Projects OSHA Related Projects Outdoor Sports and Amphitheaters Parking Structures Plan and EIR Reviews Pumping Stations Railroad Projects Residential Developments Reverberation Noise/Room Acoustics Schools and Classrooms Street Widening and Alterations Testing Services Weapon Noise Studies Luengineering grouppinc. February 12, 2007 Ms. Marie Mack GURALNICK & GILLILAND, LLP 74-399 Highway 111, Suite M Palm Desert, CA 92260 transportation planning • traffic engineering acoustical engineering • parking studies Subject: La Quinta Resort Signature Pool (Site Development Permit 2006-865) Traffic and Acoustical Study Review Dear Ms. Mack, introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. has reviewed the environmental documentation for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool (Site Development Permit 2006-865) prepared by Impact Sciences, Inc. January 2007. The environmental documentation included two technical reports, one for Traffic/Parking Impact Analysis and one for Acoustical Impact Analysis. The traffic study was prepared by Endo Engineering and was dated January 8th, 2007. The Acoustic Study was prepared by Veneklasen Associates, Inc dated January 8th, 2007. RK reviewed the environmental documents and technical reports with respect to the proposed modification to the La Quinta Resort to add a signature pool (major water feature). This would replace a portion of the existing tennis courts and dedicated children's play area as well as the existing hotel swimming pool with a major water feature. The objective of the project is to reduce the seasonal variation occupancy rates for the guest rooms by attracting younger families with children to the resort during off-peak summer months and holiday months. Traffic/Parking Impacts The primary claim of the traffic study is that there is no change in impacts as a result of the development of the major water feature during peak -season conditions. According to the report, it will only change occupancy rates during the off-peak season (June through September) and would not impact the peak winter season times from January through May. Based upon our review, RK would offer the following comments regarding the technical traffic study for the project: 3991 macarthur bwlevar3, QS it1Q V newport beach, califomia 92660 tel 949.474,0809 fax 949.474.0902 hap://www.rkengineer.com 1. The basic premise of the document reviewed is that there will be no increase in peak seasonal trip generation or parking demand as a result of the addition of the major water feature. The study claims that during the peak, season the facility is already at full capacity on weekends and is utilized between 70 to 80 percent during the peak season weekdays. While the study claims there will be no increase in occupancy during the peak season as a result of the use of the water feature, they recognize that increases in occupancy would occur during the off-peak season (June through September) when occupancy rates currently drop to 30 to 60 percent of the resort's capacity. No actual hard data is presented to justify these claims. While the water feature will certainly be utilized more during the warmer summer months, the climate in the desert area during the peak seasons (January through May) is mild and would also attract additional usage as a result of the major water feature. The traffic study does not present any quantitative data from other similar facilities to indicate that additional usage during the peak season would not occur and, therefore would not adversely impact the transportation and parking facilities in and around the La Quinta resort facility. 2. There is no quantitative assessment (level of service analysis) of existing conditions at intersections or roadway segments surrounding the La Quinta Resort facility. The entire premise of the traffic and parking study is that there will be no change in trip generation or parking demand during the peak season, therefore there will be no effect on the existing transportation or parking systems. The traffic impact study does not include any quantification of existing levels of service at the surrounding intersections which could affect neighboring properties. It is not known whether adequate levels of service occur during either the peak or off-peak seasons surrounding the La Quinta Resort facility. At a minimum, it is recommended that arterial intersections and major access road intersections should be evaluated for existing conditions for both peak and off peak seasons to determine whether there are existing problems at these intersections and whether additional improvements may be necessary to mitigate both existing and future conditions with the project. Traffic impacts with the proposed project should also be assessed. 3. A substantial qualitative discussion of parking demand is included in the Traffic Impact Analysis. However, no quantitative assessment of existing parking demand at the facility or along adjacent roadway segments has been provided in the document. Again, the premise is made that no increase in parking demand would occur during peak seasonal activities as a result of the major water feature. Again, this is not substantiated by any data presented in the study and there is no way to assess whether the existing facilities can accommodate both existing and future additional parking demand as a result of the implementation of the proposed water feature. A survey of existing conditions for both peak and off-peak conditions would be useful in determining whether the facility can accommodate the existing and future parking demand with the expansion to include the proposed major water feature. �an6�i 2 4. The Traffic Impact Study indicates that a parking management may be necessary. RK would recommend that a very specific parking management plan be prepared prior to the demolition and construction of the project. This should be prepared for both the initial construction period and the actual operation of the facility for both peak season and off-peak season time frames. The parking management plan needs to include a specific action plan. This should include a map which identifies available parking areas, location of parking directors, parking facilities to accommodate both staff and guests, and any special valet parking requirements that may be required to operate the facility. The parking management plan should include a monitoring program to annually review the operation of the parking facilities for both peak and off -,peak season -conditions. The parking management plan may need to be adjusted over time, based upon actual demand for these facilities. The construction portion of the parking management plan should be very specific with respect to staging of construction vehicles, parking of construction employees, and the need for possible temporary parking facilities to accommodate the construction activities. The parking management plan should also have provision for adequately cleaning both private and public roadways during the construction period. Acoustical Impact Study The Acoustical Study indicates that the mechanical equipment and activity noise generated by the proposed water feature will not exceed the City of La Quinta noise ordinance standards for the project. All major mechanical equipment should be housed within enclosures to minimize noise impacts to the surrounding facilities within the La Quinta Resort and any adjacent noise sensitive receivers. The noise Impacts may be adequately mitigated through the recommended enclosures and operation (hours of operation) of the facility. This may occur when the mechanical equipment is completely enclosed and they are made of appropriate noise insulating material. This can only be determined through appropriate on -site monitoring and testing. Hours of operations will need to be monitored closely for the facility. It is recommended that the noise levels be monitored during peak and off-peak season time frames to ensure that the La Quinta noise ordinance is not exceeded at the surrounding properties. La Quinta Resort should also establish specific operational hours for the major water feature to ensure that it does not disrupt other guests within the facility or the adjoining community. Once the specific equipment and enclosures has been installed, then the actual noise monitoring can occur to determine if any follow up action is required. A specific noise monitor program should be established for at least one full year after the project is completed to insure compliance with the City of La Quinta Noise Ordinance. The noise monitoring will not occur when the mechanical equipment is operating and when the signature pool is being used by guests. 3 000639 Conclusion RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. has reviewed the environmental documentation for the proposed major water feature for the La Quinta Resort facility with respect to traffic, parking and acoustical issues. The major issue that has been identified include the lack of quantitative proof that trip generation or parking demand would not increase during the peak seasonal conditions. The review of other comparable facilities where these types of facilities have been added would be useful in making this determination. There has been no quantitative assessment of both, existing or future traffic impacts (level of service) at the surrounding intersections or roadway segments. The level of service at these locations has not been established to determine whether there are existing deficiencies in the circulation system surrounding the facility. Even minor increases in trip generation could cause adverse traffic impacts if these intersections and roadway segments are currently operating at poor levels of service during peak or even off-peak season conditions. No quantification of existing parking demand has been included in the traffic impact study. It can not determine whether the existing facilities can currently accommodate parking demand during peak season or off-peak season conditions. Some assessment of the existing parking condition would be desirable to determine whether there are existing deficiencies at the site and whether additional mitigation measures are required. RK recommends that a very strong parking management program be required during both the construction period and under normal operations for the project. This program should be developed and approved by the City prior to the start of any demolition or construction for the project. The parking management plan will need to be very specific with respect to staging areas, parking directors, need for valet service, or special services and other conditions. It is recommended that an on -going noise monitoring program be established for a period of at least one year after completion of the project. This should occur with all mechanical equipment in operation and the signature pool being used by guests. This would be required to insure compliance with the City of La Quinta's Noise Ordinance. RK ENGINEERING GROUP INC. appreciates this opportunity to work with Garalnick and Gilian, LLP regarding the expansion of the La Quinta Resort signature pool facility. If you have any questions Sincerely, RK ENGINEERING %.O" .,_ 1 Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal Md. 0555 comments, please call me at (949) 474-0809. RK:rd/RK5409.doc 4 IN:1945-07-01 engineering group, inc. AREAS OF EXPERTISE • Traffic Engineering • Transportation Planning • Transportation Solutions • Traffic Impact Analysis • Circulation Systems for Planned Communities • Traffic Control Device Warrants • Traffic Calming • Traffic Safety Studies • Parking Demand Studies • Traffic Signal, Signing and Striping Plans • Traffic Control Plans • Parking Lot Design • Acoustical Engineering • ,Noise Impact Studies EDUCATION University of California, Berkeley, M.S., Civil Engineering, 1968 University of California, Berkeley, B.S., Civil Engineering, 1967 University of California, Los Angeles, Graduate Courses in Transportation Systems, 1970 Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Robert Kahn, P.E., has worked professionally in traffic engineering and transportation planning since 1968. He received his master of science degree in civil engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering. Mr. Kahn received his bachelors degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Berkley. Mr. Kahn started his career in California Division of Highways (Caltrans) and developed the first computerized surveillance and control system for the Los Angeles area. Mr. Kahn developed the California Incident Detection Logic which is utilized throughout California for the detection of traffic incidents on the freeway system. Mr. Kahn has worked for a major land development company preparing Master Plans for infrastructure. He also has worked eleven years with a multi -disciplined consulting engineering firm in charge of the Engineering Planning Department. This included all facets of preliminary design, tentative map preparation, transportation and environmental engineering, and public agency coordination. Mr. Kahn has provided traffic and transportation services to major planned communities including Aliso Viejo, Coto De Caza, Foothill Ranch, Highlands Ranch in Denver, Colorado, Mission Viejo, Talega Planned Community in San Clemente, and Wolf Valley Ranch in Temecula. He has also provided contract traffic engineering services to the Cities of Irvine, Norwalk, Perris and San Jacinto in Riverside County, California. Mr. Kahn has prepared traffic impact studies for numerous communities throughout Southern California, Nevada and in Colorado. Major traffic impact studies include the Aliso Viejo Town Center, the Summit Development, the Shops at Mission Viejo, Kaleidoscope, Dana Point Headlands, Foothill Ranch, Talega, Majestic Spectrum, and Centre Pointe in the City of Chino. His work in the area of parking demand studies and parking lot design has been extensive. Shared parking studies for the Aliso Viejo Town Center, Foothill Ranch Towne Centre, Trabuco Plaza and numerous commercial sites have been completed to accurately determine the peak parking demand for mixed use projects. Mr. Kahn has been able to make the most efficient utilization of parking lots maximizing efficient and safe systems. lvJ ►ayo6 41 Page 1 of 2 RK engineering group, inc. engineering group, inc. Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal PROFESSIONAL Mr. Kahn has been an innovator in developing and HISTORY implementing traffic calming techniques. Over twenty years ago, Mr. Kahn refined the design and implementation RK engineering group, inc., standards for speed humps for use in local neighborhoods. 2001-present Most recently, he has been involved in the development of modern roundabouts in lieu of traffic signals or other traffic RKJK &Associates, Inc., control devices at intersections. Mr. Kahn previously Principal, 1990-2000 presented the use of traffic calming devices in newly developing communities to the Institute of Transportation Robert Kahn and Associates, Engineers Traffic Calming Conference in Monterey, Inc., Principal, 1988-1990 California. Jack G. Raub Company, Mr. Kahn has been involved in the design of traffic signal Vice President Engineering € systems, signing and striping plans on hundreds of projects Planning, 1977-1988 for both the public and private sector. Most recently, he has completed the design of several traffic signals which will The Irvine Company, serve the renovated Shops at Mission Viejo Mall. Mr. Kahn Program Engineer, 1972- was in charge of a major ITS project for the City of Irvine, 1977 which provided fiberoptic interconnect and closed circuit TV along Barranca Parkway, Alton Parkway and Lake Forest Caltrans California Division of Drive. Highways, Assistant Engineer, 1968-1972 Mr. Kahn has been involved in acoustical engineering since 1978. He was in responsible charge of the Aliso Viejo Noise AFFILIATIONS Monitoring Program which redefined the 65 CNEL noise contours for MCAS El Toro. He has also developed Institute of Transportation computer applications of the FHWA Noise Model. Engineers (ITE) Mr. Kahn has prepared numerous noise impact reports in American Society of Civil the Aliso Viejo, Mission Viejo, Foothill Ranch, Santa Engineers (ASCE) Margarita, Ladare and Talega Planned Communities. Noise impacts from stationery sources including car washes, American of Public Works I loading docks, air conditioning compressors, drive-thru Association (APWA) speakers and other sources have been evaluated in the Aliso Viejo Auto Retail Center Noise Study, Albertsons Store Consulting Engineers and 606 Noise Study -Rancho Cucamonga, Pro Source Land Surveyors (CELSOC) Distribution Building Final Noise Study in Ontario. Major specific plan and zone change noise studies have been Orange County Traffic prepared for the Summit Heights Specific Plan in Fontana, Engineers Council (OCTEC) Lytle Creek Land and Resources Property in Rialto, Tamarack Square in Carlsbad, California, International Trade and Transportation Center in Kern County, California, and Sun City/Palm Springs. Mr. Kahn founded the firm of Robert Kahn and Associates in 1988, which was the predecessor to RKJK & Associates, Inc. in 1990. He has made presentations to the ITE and the California Public Works Conference. 00064" Paae 2 of 2 RK engineering group, Inc. t ATTACHMENT #11 Veneklasen Associates Consuhants ,n.Acousucs & Audio-Visaal Design February 15,2007 CNL Hotels & Resorts, LLC CNL Center II at City Commons 420 South Orange Avenue, Suite 700 Orlando, Florida 32801-3313 Attention: Mr. Doug Evans, City Planning Director Subject: La Quinta Resort Pool Area Modification Response to Gurainick and Gilliland's letter dated 2/12/2007 and Wieland Associates 2/12/2007 Letter FIT I I Veneklasen Associates has had a chance to review section 3 of the letter from Guralnick and Gilliland. There are several points that appear to be misinterpretations of Veneklasen Associates acoustical report that may perhaps benefit from additional explanation. As you are aware Veneklasen Associates performed their analysis, prior to several noise reduction measures agreed to by the CNL Hotels & Resorts, including providing selected areas of solid acoustical walls near the tennis and spa villas, enclosing all of the slides, splitting the rock formation in two, and removing the top of the north rock formation nearest the North Tennis Villas, blocking access of occupants on the top of the north rock formation, lowering the elevation of the Lazy River and the addition of a hidden solid sound barrier at the top of the south rock formation slide entrance area. All of these additional measures are expected to further reduce noise levels below the levels shown in VA's January 8, 2007 analysis. As indicated in our report, Veneklasen Associates used sound pressure levels from previous projects of active children on a playground. The noise levels reported in Table 4 were described as `Child Slightly Elevated Voice. This was an attempt to summarize, in a shorthand phrase, the used sound power level already described in the paragraph above the table. The noise levels used by VA in Table 4 were measurements from children on school playgrounds in the process of excited play. Those familiar with school playgrounds know that standard noise events at a schoolyard would include "frequent children's screaming, yelling and typical playtime voice content at elevated levels". In fact, VA assumed that at the noise source, 25% of the children would all be vocally active including screaming and yelling nonstop for one hour at an 81 dBA sound power level. For comparison purposes adult voice has a sound power level of approximately 67 dBA in a normal' setting. It is important to note that VA's analysis compares existing typical conditions with expected maximum occupancy conditions in the future Pool Area. VA understands the SDP site is currently zoned for and holds parties, and other events such as movie nights by the existing Formal Pool and the Stadium Court. The Guralnick and Gilliland letter goes on to report that "it is inconceivable that the water park, when used at anywhere near capacity, will not significantly increase noise levels." Yet there does not appear to be any acoustical study that allowed this conclusion to be developed. Rather the Guralnick and Gilliland letter merely attaches a letter from Wieland Associates, critiquing VA's acoustical study, Wieland Associates did not prepare any independent study of its own. As requested, VA has the following clarifications and rebuttal comments regarding the concerns addressed in Wieland Associates review of our report. 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica Cakibmio 90404 -tel. 310.450.1733 -far 310396.3424 • www.vonekTasen..6 4 3 Veneklasen Associates Mr. Doug Evans —February 15, 2007 Page 2 1. Section 4.0, page 4. The text states that the Children's Play area has been excluded from the study because the functions won't change from the area's current use. However, the area should have been analyzed because (a) it's an entirely new use; (b) it's in a new location; (c) it's specifically designed for the use of children, who are typically noisier than adults. VA's response: VA was informed that the Children's Play area is currently zoned and used as a Children's Play area with the same functions as proposed for this area. A site visit confirmed VA's assumption is accurate and Wieland Associates' contrary assertion of current non-use by children is inaccurate. 2. Section 4, page 4. The text does not identify other noise sources that should have been considered, including the new outdoor dining terraces, game room and arrival plaza. The text also does not state whether there will be a public address or outdoor music system in the area. VA's response: The identified uses are already existing uses. No additional outdoor sound system beyond what Is already existing has been identified to VA as a new addition to this project. 3. Section 5, page 4. The text states that the City's noise standard applies a 5 dB penalty for noise that "consists entirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech or music, or any combination thereof." The text goes on to state that this penalty does not apply to the project because the noise is not entirely speech (since mechanical equipment has been considered). However, this is disingenuous since the analysis clearly indicates in Table 7 that the noise from pool activities (i.e. speech) is so dominant that mechanical equipment noise can be dismissed.' Therefore, the 5 dB penalty should be applied to the project, resulting in a daytime standard of 55 dB(A) at the residential property lines. VA's response: The analysis was a worst case scenario which assumed a constant level of voices (i.e. children screaming) for a period of one hour. In actuality the noise sources would create a time varying noise signature which would dove tail into the City's Noise Ordinance section on time varying standards as stated in Section C of 9.10.200. The analysis and projected noise sources do not meet the intent of Section B and does not entirely consist of impact, tonal, speech, music or a combination of these qualities therefore the 5 dB penalty does not apply. 4. Section 6.1, page 5. The analysis of maximum occupancy isn't clear. The assumed maximum occupancy of 1,100 people is about half of the stated design load of the Signature Pool project (i.e. 1,390 bathers + 793 lounge chairs = design load of 2,183). VA's response: Occupancy was defined by the Hotel management as described in the report. 5. Section 6.1, page 5. It isn't clear why Veneklasen Associates had to assume occupancy percentages for the Active Pool area and Children's Pool area when CNL Hotels & Resorts was able to provide the same information for the Formal Pool Area. Have these percentages been verified by CNL Hotels & Resorts? VA's response: VA's report addressed occupant loading for different locations and usage within the pool area to estimate the potential noise source locations. Again occupant levels were defined by the hotel operator. 000644 wwv1.venek1asen_coin I I . Veneklasen Associates Consuitants in Acoustics & Audio -Visual Design Mr. Doug Evans — February 15, 2007 Page 3 6. Section 6.1, page 5. What is the Active Pool Area? Assuming this refers to the combined Splash Down Pool area, Lazy River and Wave Pool area, how is the assumed occupancy percentage of 53% divided among these three uses? VA's response: The sound power level of the total vocal content was placed at or near the center of the total area of usage. 7. Section 6.1, page 5. What is the basis for assuming that only 50% of the occupants in the Active Pool area will be children? A higher percentage would seem to be more appropriate since the areas would seem to be specifically designed to entertain children. VA's response: The reference to "percentage of active voices" refers to the number of occupants that were assumed to be talking, yelling or screaming over the period of an hour in each pool area 8. Section 6. L, page 6. The text states an assumption that 25% of the adults will be speaking at a conversational level. What is assumed for the remaining 75%? It would appear from the analysis that it is assumed that these adults will not be making any noise. VA's response: The scenario assumed that 25% of the total adults would be talking at one time. It is highly improbable that more than 25% of the occupants would be conversing at elevated voices for an entire hour. Normal low levels of conversation were not significant. 9. Section 6.1, page 6. The text states an assumption that 50% of the children will be speaking at a slightly elevated level. What is assumed for the remaining 50°/u? It would appear from the analysis that it is assumed that these children will not be making any noise. What assumptions have been made about the percentage of children shrieking and shouting, as typically occurs in such an environment? VA's response: The sound power level was derived from making measurements of children on a playground (including yelling and screaming). The activities with respect to sound on an active playground are expected to be similar to the pool areas. It is improbable that more than 25% of the children will be continuously vocal as described above at a sound power level of 81 dBA. This is a very extreme and improbable and worst case assumption. 10. Section 7.09i page 6. In Table 1, it isn't clear why ambient Leg' noise levels are presented. The City's standards are not presented in terms of Leq, but in terms of L2, L8, L25, L50 and Lmax noise levels. These should have been presented in the table, not Leq. VA's response: Analysis of L, and Leq for the sound levels used for the analysis indicated that they were equal. Using the descriptor of Leq allowed permitted calculation of the total equivalent power of the time varying voice content. 11. Section 7.0, page 6. The purpose of ambient noise measurement positions 02 and 03 isn't clear. Both are in the middle of existing tennis court areas. Why were no ambient measurements obtained at the nearest residences south of the Splash Down Pool area, and east of the project site across Avenida Obregon? VA's response: At the time of the measurements areas of easiest access that allowed for a sampling over the entire project site were used. Each measurement was consistent and indicated that the entire area was not dominated by a single source, but was derived from multiple sound sources at distant locations. d006453 1711 Sxteenth Street - Santo Monica Cahfornia 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 -fax: 310.396.3424 - www.veriektasemcom Veneklasen Associates Mr. Doug Evans — February 15, 2007 Page 4 12. Section 7.0, page 6. There does not appear to be any basis for assuming that the ambient noise level measured at Location 1 in Figure 1 is applicable to Location 3 in Figure 2. Nor does there appear to be any basis for assuming that this application is more stringent since the In values necessary to make such an assumption have not been provided. VA's response: See response to item 11 above. 13. Section 7.0, page 6. No data sheets have been provided to identify the measurement data, equipment and procedures. VA's response: Data, equipment and procedures are described in Section 7.0 page 6 Table of SLMs. 14. Section 8.0, page 7. No parameters or calculations have been provided to verify the analysis of mechanical equipment and procedures. VA's response: Sufficient information has been provided to allow a qualified acoustical consultant to follow the noise levels used and the calculation methods. Appendix I lists all of the mechanical equipment data. Sound power calculations were made for the total sound power level within the enclosed mechanical rooms using standard procedures. The sound power for the equipment rooms were calculated to the louver location and then used in the computer model for impact analysis. 15. Section 8.0, page 7, The ISO 9613 standard is only applicable to the analysis of outdoor noise sources. What methodology was used to estimate noise levels from the mechanical equipment housed in structures? Noise from.inside structures can propagate to the nearby residential communities through vents, doors and other openings. VA's response: Refer to item 14 above. 16. Section 8.0, page 7. Table 2 presents calculations and assesses impacts relative to the Leq noise metric. As stated in Comment #9, Leq is not relevant to the City's noise ordinance standards. VA's response: Analysis of the Ln measured for the occupant noise sources indicates that the L, and L. were statistically equal (see 10 above). 17. Section 8.1, page 7. No parameters or calculations have been provided to verify the analysis of operational noise levels. VA's response: The VA report is a summary of the analysis indicating the values used, the general calculation methods used, and the expected results. 18. Section 8.1, page 7. What is the basis for assuming that noise levels measured at cocktail parties and playgrounds are applicable to a water park? Why weren't actual noise levels measured at existing, similar facilities? VA's response: In order to conduct a noise analysis some assumptions must be made. VA's experience with activity noise indicates that the sound power levels utilized for this analysis are reasonable and derived from measured data. 000646 www.veneklasen rom Veneklasen Associates Consultants in Acousucs & Audio -Visual Design Mr. Doug Evans — February 15, 2007 Page 5 19. Section 8.1, pages 7 and 8. The analysis of operational noise is based on sound power levels. What procedure was used to convert these sound powei levels to the L2, L8, L25, L50 and Lmax metrics used in the City's noise ordinance? VA's response: The sound power level conversion indicated in the report was used to determine the L,q at the locations indicated. As documented in item 16 L,q and Lin values were determined to be statistically equal based on our measurements of the noise sources used to assume occupant noise. 20. Section 8.1, pages 7 and 8. What assumptions have been made to account for the noise levels produced by children shrieking and shouting, as typically occurs in such an environment? It would not appear to be reasonable to assume that children using a wave pool or a water slide would only speak in a slightly elevated voice. VA's response: The vocal content spectrum used included children performing typical activities on an active playground. These activities included screaming and yelling. The spectrum and acoustic power used was appropriate for this analysis and reasonably applies to the expected usage. 21. Section 8.1, page 8. Table 6 presents pool activity levels in terms of Leq, but Table 5 presents the same levels in terms of L50. What is the basis for assuming that Leq equals L50? VA's response: Measurements conducted at the playground indicated the Leq and Lso were statistically equal. 22. Section 8.1, page 8. It does not appear that the following have been considered I the analysis of operational noise levels: (a) people (primarily children) talking, shrieking and shouting at the top of the water slides; (b) water splashing from play activities, water slides and waterfalls; (c) waves "crashing" at the Wave Pool; (it) activities at the Entry Plaza area; (e) activities in the game room; and (0 activities at the outdoor dining terraces. VA's response: See item 20. Based on conversations with the water feature consultant VA understood the mechanical equipment operating the wave pool were Potentially the most significant noise sources and that there would not be any 'crashing' waves. In tact the wave generating mechanism is under water and thus will not be a significant source of noise. As to wave noise, VA has been informed that the generated waves will be far smaller than those observed in any commercial water park, i.e. not more than 18 inch height 23. Section 8.2, page 9. Table 7 apparently mixes Leq and L50 noise levels in the calculations. What is the basis for assuming that Leq equals 50? VA's response: See item 21. 24. Section 9.0, page 9. The text states that an increase of 5 dB is typically noticeable but not significant. Most communities consider an increase of 3-5 dB to be the level at which a significant impact occurs. Since the analysis indicates that the project will increase noise levels by 6 dB, this should be considered a significant impact. VA's response: A 3-5 dB increase is often termed a'noticeable impact'. It is acknowledged that some jurisdictions consider any noise increase that is noticeable to represent a significant environmental impact This is not, however, a universally adopted threshold used for the purposes of determining the significant of a change in noise levels and is not a threshold 000647 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica Carifomia 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 -fax 310.396.3424 • www.verleklasen.coin I-.*,,,.. �...f� Veneklasen Associates Mr, Doug Evans — February 15, 2007 Page 6 adopted by the City of La Quinta for this purpose, A significant impact typically does not occur until a 10 dB increase, because, as explained in the study, alOdB or more increase in noise is generally perceived as a doubling in loudness. It is important to note that the potential 6 dB increase identified in the study would require all the assumptions in the analysis to occur at one point in time i.e. an unlikely worst case scenario, and it is expected that this condition would happen very infrequently, if at all. In addition, this occasional potential increase in noise of 6dB was only identified for Location 2 as identified in the study and not for the other 2 locations. The majority of the time at the majority of the locations studied the noise increases would be less than 5dB. 25. Section 9.0, page 9. The text states that an increase of 10 dB is considered to be twice as loud. This is generally only true when a single noise source (such as traffic) increases by 10 dB. The noise sources that will be produced by the Signature Pool project are quite different from the ambient sources in the area; therefore, it cannot be said that an increase of 10 dB will be perceived as being twice as loud. VA's response: This comment indicates the text on Page 9 of our study states that an increase of lOdB is considered to be twice as loud. This is not an accurate representation of the text of the study which reads: " A lOdB or more increase in noise is generally perceived as a doubling in loudness and typically is considered a significant increase" (emphasis added). There are many factors in judging human response to noise. These factors include frequency content and amplitude. It is true that depending on the noise content and the amplitude the total increase in sound energy can be perceived differently. For instance if you increase the background noise level 5 dB by playing background music it will be perceived differently than if you increase the background noise level with a vacuum cleaner. However, as a general rule of thumb, as a point of reference, a 10 dB increase is usually perceived as an approximate doubling in loudness. 000049 wwww.ven klasen.com 4"u,V�rv* WVeneklasen Associates Conwhants to Acoustics & Audio -Visual Design Mr. Doug Evans — February 15, 2007 Page 7 The last page of the letter from Wieland Associates also contains 3 comments on Section XI, Noise, of the Addendum, which presents a summary of the information and analysis in our study. Impact Sciences provided the following comments to address these items: 1. The text of the Addendum is consistent with the text in our study. The paragraph referenced in this comment states that, in general, a 5 dB(A) increase in noise typically causes a change in community reaction while an increase in 10(dB(A) is perceived by people as a doubling in loudness. Please note that this statement is referenced to an U.S. EPA study on environmental noise. This portion of the text of the Addendum is consistent with our study which, as indicated above, states on Page 9 that a 5dB increase over ambient noise levels would be about the level of perceived change by most people and is typically considered noticeable for this reason, but not a significant environmental impact. 2. The text of the Addendum does not conflict with our study. The Addendum states our study determined the increase in noise would be minimal. As our conclusion is that the increase in noise would not be substantial or significant, it could also be termed minimal. 3. The study included monitoring of the existing noise levels around the existing tennis courts. Accordingly, the increase in noise from existing conditions, which includes noise from use of the existing tennis courts, represents the increase in noise over the existing tennis courts. Yours sincerely Veneklasen Associates Robert Robey Managing Principal GM 170-001_taquin a Resort Pool Area ModificationVetter04.adb.doc 00064, 1711 Sixteenth Street - Santa Monica California 90404 •tell: 310.450.1733 -fix: 310.396.3424 • www_veneklasen.com 1,,,Iy e. Endo Engineering Traffic Engineering Air Quality Studies Noise Assessments February 15, 2007 Mr. David Urban Vice President of Planning and Development CNL Hotels & Resorts, LLC CNL Center H at City Commons 420 S. Orange Ave., Suite 700 Orlando, Florida 32801-3313 SUBJECT: Response to Comments on the La Quinta Resort and Club EA 2006-573 and site Development Permit 2006-865 Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Urban; Endo Engineering has reviewed the comments dated February 12, 2007 on the Environmental Assessment No. 2006-573, Site Development Permit 2006-865 Traffic Impact Analysis (dated January 8, 2007) that were prepared by Guralnick & Gilliland, LLP Attorneys at Law. The traffic comments were based upon a peer review of the traffic letter submitted by RK Engineering Group, Inc. on February 12, 2007. To facilitate your review, we have reiterated each comment below, followed by the corresponding response. Comment 1: The traffic impact analysis states, "use of the water feature will be limited to hotel guests staying at the La Quinta Resort Hotel and a select number of individuals who participate in the exclusive Club Membership Program associated with the La Quinta Resort & Club." In fact, with 800 hotel rooms and 862 existing memberships, 1,662 cars could potentially be using cars to make trips to the Hotel to use the water park. Response 1: While there are currently 511 golf memberships and 417 non -golf memberships, the average age of the current club members exceeds 55 years. Approximately 75% of the current club members have no children under 23 years of age who would be allowed to use the water feature. The $15,000.00 initial cost of the non -golf club membership plus the $210.00 monthly fee make it unlikely that many new club memberships will be sold solely to gain access to the water feature. The existing swimming pool and tennis courts which exist on -site today are currently under utilized and the historical occupancy rates of the hotel indicate that it is also under utilized in the warmer months, when the water feature would be most likely to attract resort guests. The intent of the proposed water feature is to increase the annual occupancy of the hotel, particularly in the slower summer months. The water feature will be closed during more than 60 percent of the weeks each year, when the hotel bookings are traditionally highest and will operate only from 10:00 AM through 6:00 PM when open. 28811 Woodcock Drive, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677-1330 Phone: (949) 362-0020 Facsimile: (949) 362-0015 000641 l � ] Comment 2: The Traffic Impact Analysis makes the assumption that Club Members are not likely to use the water park very much: "For the most part, the number of occupied guest rooms will determine the number of trips that will be generated by the resort and also establish the demand for off-street hotel parking." (Traffic Impact Study, p. 10) Response 2: The traffic volume associated with the 800-room resort hotel and ancillary facilities on -site today is a function on: (1) the number of occupied hotel rooms, and (2) the number of club memberships being used on any given day for access to the amenities provided on -site. The La Quinta Resort & Club has entitlements for the 800-room hotel and the number of rooms will not change as a result of the proposed project. The proposed change in the ancillary recreational amenities at the resort will make more consistent year- round use of its existing entitlements by increasing the demand for room bookings, primarily during the hot summer months (June, July and August) when the hotel occupancy is typically lowest. The La Quinta Resort already has approvals to operate the hotel at full occupancy. If more aggressive advertising were used to increase the hotel bookings, a traffic impact study would not be required. Similarly, no traffic study should be required by CEQA to address a change in the hotel occupancy rates as a result of a modification to the water -related recreational amenities provided for hotel guests, provided day -use admission is not permitted at the water feature. Comment 3: The hotel already experiences near peak occupancy during the winter -early .spring season and therefore, additional vehicle trips can be generated by Club members traveling to use the new water park. It is claimed that demand for the water park will be "relatively small during the winter months." This is sheer speculation without any foundation. Therefore the Traffic Impact Study concludes that "the water feature may not increase peak club member usage appreciably, even without restrictions on club member access to the water feature." (Traffic Impact Study, p. 11) This is simply wishful thinking. It is admitted that gold, tennis, spa and other club amenities are high during the "season". There is no reason to assume that Club members will neglect to use the new water park amenities. The average temperatures in the "season" are in the 70s and 80s. (See Average Monthly Temperatures for La Quinta, CA from Weather.com) Response 3: The water feature will be closed on weekdays, from Labor Day through Memorial Day, except for holidays and Spring Break (when' room bookings are traditionally substantially lower). The average temperatures in February range from a high of 76 degrees to a low of 47 degrees. Similarly, the average temperatures in March range from a high of 81 degrees to a low of 52 degrees. By comparison, the average high temperature from June to September ranges between 108 and 103 degrees and the average low ranges from 72 to 78 degrees. With the average temperature more than 20 degrees warmer in the summer, the demand for water recreation should be substantially greater in the summer than the winter. Consequently, club members should not be using the water feature when the hotel is operating at peak occupancy. The scheduled operation of the water feature reflects the reduced demand anticipated to exist during the cooler winter months. Limited operation during the winter months is typical of water park and water slide recreational facilities in the Coachella Valley. Knott's Soak City in Palm Springs is closed from October 29 to March 5, with longer operating hours during the summer months. Similarly, the Palm Springs Swim Center is closed from November to February, with longer operating hours during the summer months. Based upon the demand 000641 44.'" v.J at similar facilities in the area, the traffic study correctly states that the demand for use of the water park will be "relatively small during the winter months." Comment 4: The Traffic Impact Study admits that during the season, "the Hotel operates near its full occupancy with very few off-street parking paces unoccupied. As a result, the number of parking spaces available in the peak season which could be used by club members who wish to visit the water feature is limited." In short, there is no available parking for Club members who intend to use the water park during the season. The Traffic Impact Study optimistically projects that "Club member traffic to/from the water feature in the winter or early spring, when traffic volumes are typically at their peak in La Quinta, could be limited by the cooler weather and the age of the club members (which averages 55+) and their families." This assumption is again without any realistic foundation — the applicant wishes to preserve the water park for use by Club members but wishes the city to believe that in the high season, it is too cold, and their members too old, to use it! Of course Club members' families can use the facilities and presumably would do so. Response 4: During the peak hours of use during the peak season, the number of parking spaces in the vicinity of the La Quinta Spa and the proposed water feature is limited. To verify the availability of parking, a parking survey was c o le on February 9, 2007 that revealed that although there were localized areas of high parking usage, the overall parking demand of the entire resort ranged from a high of 52 percent of the total number of parking spaces (525 of the 1,005 spaces) at 10:00 AM to a low of 37 percent at 8:00 PM. The traffic study recognized that the primary use of the water feature will be during the summer months when there will be additional parking spaces available at the resort. However, with a minimum of 480 empty parking spaces available on -site during a typical peak season day (February 9, 2007), there should be a sufficient number of off-street parking spaces to accommodate the demand generated by the proposed water feature at all times of the year. Comment 5: The letter from Paul McCormick, attachment 5 to the Staff Report, attempting to justify the non-use of the water park by the Club members, is not based upon anything other than the unrealistic expectation that Club members, because they historically have not used what is apparently an under -used existing pool, won't use the water park. The argument that the Club members will not use the water park because of their demographic is not supported by anything other than the applicant's "belief' that they would only have a "nominal effect on the usage of the Pool." (Letter from Paul McCormick dated January 11, 2007, Attachment 5 to Staff Report) Response 5: Paul McCormick's expectation that the Club members will have only a nominal effect on the usage of the pool is based upon his years of experience as General Manager of the La Quinta Resort and years of experience with the recreation facilities at the resort. However, even if there is considerable use of the water feature by club members, there are a sufficient parking spaces available on -site to accommodate the club members. Only 52 percent of the overall parking supply on -site was used during a typical peak season Friday. Comment 6: The Traffic Study also claims that the Club members won't be using the water park in the summer, either! "The potential for significant traffic impacts as a result of the limited number of Club members who will utilize the water feature in the summer months should be low." The "Traffic Impact Analysis" simply relies upon wishful thinking rather than any real analysis of the impacts of use by Club members of these facilities. This sort of speculation cannot be the basis for a realistic traffic impact study under CEQA. oOO643 i Response 6: Since the average hotel occupancy during August is nearly one-half that of March, the reduction in parking demand on -site during the summer is expected to increase the number of available parking spaces on -site by more than 200 parking spaces. Similarly, the trip generation of the resort is substantially lower during the summer months. In addition, the background traffic volumes in La Quinta are typically 40 percent lower during the summer months than during the peak winter season. Since the traffic volumes during the summer months are substantially lower than in the peak winter months, the potential for significant traffic impacts as a result of the traffic associated with Club members using the water feature should be very low. Even with a successful water feature, the occupancy of the resort during the summer is not expected to approach the occupancy of the resort during the winter. As previously noted, the La Quinta Resort has approvals to operate at 100 percent occupancy during the summer months and the winter months. Comment 7: Avenida Obregon is the main access to both cars and pedestrians to the proposed "action pool" facility and is already grossly overused by pedestrians and is hugely prone to illegal parking. (See Photos by Fredericks). Avenida Obregon is completely insufficient to handle additional cars or pedestrians to access the new pool facilities. The proposal to ultimately gate Avenida Obregon is a possible solution, and should not be considered a last resort as the applicant presents it. Response 7: Although the La Quinta Resort has group activities that can result in brief periods of traffic congestion and higher than normal localized parking demand, the resort provides sufficient available off-street parking and roadway capacity. Roadways and parking facilities are not typically designed and constructed to satisfy the highest hourly demand of the year because of the expense involved. AASHTO suggests that the demand in the 30th highest hour of the year be used for design purposes. To document the parking accumulation and traffic volumes on -site during a peak season day, Counts Unlimited, Inc. utilized 24-hour tube counters at four locations on -site, and counted the number of parked cars on -site between 10 AM and 10 PM on Friday, February 9, 2007. As documented by Endo Engineering in a letter dated February 12, 2007, the traffic volumes are well below the capacity of the roadways on -site and a minimum of 42 percent of the parking supply on -site was available throughout the observation period. Two illegally parked vehicles were observed outside of the La Quinta Spa. Neither vehicle blocked the flow of traffic on Avenida Obregon, and there were available parking spaces within 200 to 300 feet. Comment 8: The opponents' traffic engineer, RK Engineering, has stated that overall, the Traffic Impact Analysis of Endo Engineering is inadequate because it makes no effort to assess the current capacities of either the streets or parking associated with the project, making it impossible to determine whether incremental increases in traffic and parking can, or cannot, be handled. Further, the opponents' traffic engineer states that there is no basis to assume that the traffic impacts of the water park would not be increased during the winter season, simply because the Hotel is already operating largely at peak occupancy during much of that period. (RK Engineering Review of Endo Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis, Feb. 5, 2007) Clearly the Negative Declaration is based upon a lack of data about the realistic, as opposed to unfounded, estimates of the true impacts of the water park. Response 8: In view of concerns raised regarding the existing traffic volumes and the availability of parking on -site, typical peak season traffic volumes on -site and the number of occupied parking spaces were counted on Friday, February 9, 2007. It was determined that 000644 i a minimum of 480 parking spaces (48 percent of the on -site parking supply) were unused and available throughout the day and that the roadways were operating at a small fraction of their capacities. The anticipated increase in traffic and parking associated with the water feature can be accommodated by the roadways and the available parking supply on -site. Comment 9: We strongly object to placing the construction staging area in the Palm Grove parcel. This area is immediately adjacent to the Tennis Villas, and will require construction vehicles to constantly enter and exist Avenida Fernando, which will greatly disturb both the Tennis Villas and the Enclave. The Traffic Impact Analysis admits that "Short-term construction -related traffic will be noticeable to resort guests and nearby residents who utilize Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon for access to/from their homes." (Endo Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis January 8, 2007 p. 6) There is no support given for the statement that "The roadways surrounding the La Quinta Resort, including both Avenida Fernando and Avenida Obregon, have the available capacity to serve the level of additional traffic anticipated during the construction process." The applicant must locate the construction staging area in another location so as not to disturb the residents. Response 9: The construction staging area will need to be located near the project site. The highest 24-hour traffic count on -site was on Avenida Fernanado, west of Eisenhower Drive, and indicated that 3,683 vehicles per day were using this roadway for access. Since the daily capacity of a two-lane local street is identified as 9,000 vehicles per day in the La Quinta General Plan Update Traffic Study, Avenida Fernando is operating at only 41 percent of its daily capacity. Since construction activities typically generate only a few hundred trips per day, there appears to be sufficient roadway capacity to serve the additional traffic anticipated during the construction process. Comments from RK Eneincerine Groun Inc Letter dated February 12, 2007 Comment 1: The basic premise of the document reviewed is that there will be no increase in peak seasonal trip generation or parking demand as a result of the addition of the major water feature. The study claims that during the peak season the facility is already at full capacity on weekends and is utilized between 70 to 80 percent during the peak season weekdays. While the study claims there will be no increase in occupancy during the peak season as a result of the use of the water feature, they recognize that increases in occupancy would occur during the off-peak season (June through September) when occupancy rates currently drop to 30 to 60 percent of the resort's capacity. No actual hard data is presented to justify these claims. While the water feature will certainly be utilized more during the warmer summer months, the climate in the desert area during the peak seasons (January through May) is mild and would also attract additional usage as a result of the major water feature. The traffic study does not present any quantitative data from other similar facilities to indicate that additional usage during the peak season would not occur and, therefore would not adversely impact the transportation and parking facilities in and around the La Quinta resort facility. Response 1: See Responses 3 and 7 to the Guralnick & Gilliland Comments. A traffic study addressing the traffic impacts associated with the water feature would evaluate the peak season traffic volumes of the hotel (assuming 100 percent occupancy) with the water feature in comparison to the peak season traffic volumes of the hotel with the existing tennis/pool facilities. With the access restrictions on the water "feature, the projected peak season traffic volumes appear to be essentially the same as the existing uses. Even if the water feature increases the hotel occupancy in March from 80 percent to 90 percent, this ��017 i ( i does not represent a significant traffic impact, since the hotel has entitlements to operate at 100 percent occupancy. Although it is difficult to accurately predict the potential increase in parking demand or traffic volumes associated with an increase in Club membership of the proposed facilities, the large number of available parking spaces (480 spaces) located on the project site should be able to accommodate the parking demand associated with the water feature. Since the roadways on -site are operating at a fraction of their capacities, the on -site roadways should be able to accommodate the anticipated increases in traffic volumes associated with the proposed water feature. Comment 2: There is no quantitative assessment (level of service analysis) of existing conditions at intersections or roadway segments surrounding the La Quinta Resort facility. The entire premise of the traffic and parking demand during the peak season, therefore there will be no effect on the existing transportation or parking systems. The traffic impact study does not include any quantification of existing levels of service at the surrounding intersections which could affect neighboring properties. It is not known whether adequate levels of service occur during either the peak or off-peak seasons surrounding the La Quinta Resort facility. At a minimum, it is recommended that arterial intersections and major access road intersections should be evaluated for existing conditions for both peak and off peak seasons to determine whether there are existing problems at these intersections and whether additional improvements may be necessary to mitigate both _ existing and future conditions with the project. Traffic impacts with the proposed project should also be assessed. Response 2: Since there is no projected increase in maximum resort -related traffic volumes, quantification of existing levels of service should not be necessary. However, the traffic on the roadways on -site and the number of available parking spaces on -site were counted and it was determined that the roadways were operating at only a fraction of their capacities and that a minimum of 48 percent of the total parking supply on -site was available throughout the day on a peak day (Friday, February 9, 2007). Comment 3: A substantial qualitative discussion of parking demand is included in the Traffic Impact Analysis. However, no quantitative assessment of existing parking demand at the facility or along adjacent roadway segments has been provided in the document. Again, the premise is made that no increase in parking demand would occur during peak seasonal activities as a result of the major water feature. Again, this is not substantiated by any data presented in the study and there is no way to assess whether the existing facilities can accommodate both existing and future additional parking demand as a result of the implementation of the proposed water feature. A survey of existing conditions for both peak and off-peak conditions would be useful in determining whether the facility can accommodate the existing and future parking demand with the expansion to include the proposed major water feature. Response 3: Refer to Response 2. Traffic and parking accumulation counts were made on Friday, February 9, 2007 that indicated that there was a substantial amount of available roadway capacity and a large number of available parking spaces are available on -site. Comment 4: The Traffic Impact Study indicates that a parking management plan may be necessary. RK would recommend that a very specific parking management plan be prepared prior to the demolition and construction of the project. This should be prepared for both the initial construction period and the actual operation of the facility for both peak season and off-peak season time frames. The parking management plan needs to include a specific action plan. This should include a map which identifies available parking areas, 0 000 location of parking directors, parking facilities to accommodate both staff and guests, and any special valet parking requirements that may be required to operate the facility. The parking management plan should include a monitoring program to annually review the operation of the parking facilities for both park and off-peak season conditions. The parking management plan may need to be adjusted over time, based upon actual demand for these facilities. The construction portion of the parking management plan should be very specific with respect to staging of construction vehicles, parking of construction employees, and the need for possible temporary parking facilities to accommodate the construction activities. The parking management plan should also have provision for adequately cleaning both private and public roadways during the construction period. Response 4: Prior to the construction activities and completion of the project, detailed parking management and construction management plans could reduce congestion and confusion on -site. However, detailed information about the construction and operation of the water feature is not available at this time. During the summer months, the proposed project is expected to increase the traffic volumes along Avenida Obregon. Although Endo Engineering has not concluded that development of the proposed water feature will create a significant impact on -site, issues have been raised regarding localized congestion and high parking demand along Avenida Obregon. Therefore, the project addresses these concerns by incorporating a variety of improvements to Avenida Obregon. These improvements should substantially improve the existing operation of Avenida Obregon. The proposed improvements are designed to: • reduce congestion by widening Avenida Obregon near Avenida Fernando, providing a turn -around area with a raised median, and allowing for a drop-off area for Signature Pool guests; • control traffic by providing a potential area for a guard or a gate system to limit entry (if requested by the City Planning Director); • improve safety by providing a decorative crosswalk across Avenida Obregon at the gate to the water feature with stop signs, additional signage limiting the speed on Avenida Obregon to 10-15 mph and directional information; and • monitor the traffic and parking on Avenida Obregon by providing for up to 3 traffic studies over 3 years. We trust that this adequately responds to the comments raised. If additional questions or comments arise, please do not hesitate to contact our offices by telephone at (949) 362- 0020, by facsimile at (949) 362-0015, or via electronic mail at endoengr@cox.net. Sincerely, ENDO ENGINEERING 44 Greg do Principal C�x4" Vicki Lee Endo, P.E. Registered Professional Traffic Engineer TR 1161 QRpFESSIpNq ,\c lEE Ery9 Fyc� A TR 1161 t? �ir (aoag TRAFi%-/ Oft V 7 ATTACHMENT #12 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 13, 2007 CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Quill who asked Commissioner Daniels to lead the flag salute. B. Pent: Commissioners Ed Alderson, Katie Barrows, Rick Daniels, Jim En a and Chairman Paul Quill. C. Staff\esent:munity Development Director Doug Evans, Assistant City chael Houston, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Execuy Betty Sawyer. IL PUBLIC COe III. CONFIRMAAGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Quill asked i there were any changes to the Minutes of February 13, 2007. Th a being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners were to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approv V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: _ A. Environmental Assessment 2006-579 and Site Development Permit 2006-865; a request of CNL Desert Resorts, L. P. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a signature pool facility, for the property located on the west side of Avenida Obregon, approximately 150-feet south of Avenida Fernando, within the La Quinta Resort. 1 . Chairman Quill opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Community Development Director Doug Evans explained the purpose of the Conditiona6use Permit. Staff reviewed the revised conditions. 0016150 rA\A/Onn(C\Dn 1.Ln. «..A Onn%\Q 11 n9 dnr Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 2. Chairman Quill asked if the date palm grove had a designation as Open Space. Staff stated the Specific Plan designated it as Tourist Commercial. 3. Commissioner Alderson asked if additional parking was needed would it require the removal of the palm trees. Staff stated it might require the removal of some of the trees. 4. Chairman Quill asked if there were any more questions of staff. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Quill asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Paul McCormick, Hilton Hotels Manager for the La Quinta Hotel, reviewed the project proposal. Mr. David Urban, CNL Resorts, gave a review of the concessions and conditions that had been worked out with staff. One of their concerns is water uses. If they were to add additional rooms, the rooms would use more water than the pool. Mr. Bill Markenson, Loss Prevention Manager for the Hotel, spoke in regard to loss prevention, traffic and parking related issues. He reviewed the new prevention measures that have been put into place at the Resort. In addition they will be hiring a traffic control manager to oversee all vehicle access into the Resort, along Avenida Obregon and Avenida Fernando as well as the loading dock area. He is also reviewing the additional measures that will be put into place to address the concerns raised regarding traffic and safety concerns. Chairman Quill noted that he had a conversation earlier today with Mr. McCormick and asked that one employee speak on behalf of the Resort. 5. Commissioner Alderson asked if the applicant had agreed to all the condition changes. Mr. Urban stated they have agreed. 6. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairman Quill asked if there was any other public comment. Madeline and Roger Lolley, 77-317 Avenida Fernando, objected to the fact that they had not seen the display of the rock formation transposed on a site plan. The view from their house. She addressed the sound levels that will be caused by the Pool. The noise levels should be taken from an actual water park and not what they anticipate them to be. They will be going out and measuring the noise level at Soak City to obtain the actual noise levels from a water park. 7. Mr. Bill Bresnahan, 78-425 Calle Felipe, stated he is retired from the U. S. Secret Service and is concerned with security issues. Currently, there is poaching on the pools, tennis courts and fitness n.'Wonnnc'or I n7 An.. 2 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 center from people outside the Resort. How do they intend to improve on their security that they cannot do now. 8. Mr. Ed Mittelbusher, 77-333 Calle Mazatlan, stated he had heard that if the noise level of the pool exceeded 80db it would be shut down. Staff stated that if it exceeded the City's Ordinance it would be shut down as staff will enforce the City's Ordinance. Mr. Mittelbusher asked if this applied to the noise from the construction. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated the answer is no, construction noises will exceed the noise levels and are not a part of the operation of the facility. Staff will be adding this information to the Council report. Mr. Mittelbusher stated the City is then allowing violation of the La Quinta Noise Ordinance. 9. Mr. Philip Maschka, 77-213 Calle Mazatalan, stated he is opposed to the water park because it is a dumb idea to have a water park in the desert. 10. Mr. William Puget, 77-600 Avenida Fernando, stated he was confused about the process. He understood Council directed the applicant to meet with the homeowners to work out the issues. He heard the applicant stated they had met with the homeowners, but he did not meet with him or Mr. Davis, so why is this matter again before the Commission. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated Council did direct the applicant to meet with the homeowners and the interpretation was for them to meet with the HOA and staff was directed to attend those meeting and he did. The purpose of the meeting he attended and there was a lot of dialog between the homeowners and the applicant. The applicant will have to answer as to who they specifically spoke with. Mr. Puget asked why this application is again before the Commission. Chairman Quill clarified this application is the Conditional Use Permit which is different than what was reviewed before. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston clarified this application refers to the Conditional Use Permit only. The Municipal Code prohibits an application be resubmitted in substantially the same manner again within a year. Mr. Puget asked about the hotline to call for complaints. When the Resort has its tent events they have to use generators which run long beyond the 10:00 p.m. time limit. He has gone to the hotel and asked that the generators be turned off. He was told they should have known such activities will take place when they bouo[''jrj home. He bought his home before the hotel began its expansion. If ,tl n7 A— 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 this is the response they will get on a hotline, he would suggest it will not be effective. Regarding the remote parking, where they will be shuttling people back and forth. This shuttle requires traveling on Avenida Fernando which is a private street subject to an easements and the easement applies to certain benefited property and a remote parking is not a benefited property. What incentive does the Hotel have to turn away guests? They will have to turn down revenue and alienate guests. How can they self regulate this important issue. They continue to strongly object to this project. 11. Mr. Steve Davis, 77-500 Avenida Fernando, went over an example of what happens on a daily basis in front of his house verbally and with pictures. He has been taking decimal readings in his yard to see what noises are being generated by the delivery trucks. He stated the noise generated by the trucks well exceeds the City's Noise Ordinance. They are as high as 89 decibels. He does not believe this road was permitted to allow deliveries. He then read into the record a letter submitted to the Resort documenting the events on Sunday, November 15, 2006 starting at 6:15 a.m. as to what happened on that day in regard to the delivery trucks. 12. Ms. Gloria Dodd, 48-690 Via Sierra, stated the quality of life will be reduced with the approval of this project regardless of whatever conditions are placed on the project. There is no condition that can be placed on this project that will increase their quality of life if this project is approved 13. Ms. Mary Jane O'Connor, 77-343 Avenida Fernando, stated nothing has been stated in regard to who is going to protect the adjoining property owners from any seepage from this water park. She would also like to know what type of safety features will there be for children using this pool. 14. Mr. Frank S. Hill, 49-921 Avenida Vista Bonita, stated this is an attempt to shove through a water pool over the objections of the local residents. The statistics given by the developers can be challenged by other consultants. There is no accounting of the loss of revenue from the termination of the tennis courts. Why does Hilton want to jeopardize this world class tennis facility by installing a splash pool? 15. Mr. Richard Fredericks, 49-875 Avenida Obregon, stated tlwW 51 not a street within this project that meets the Zoning Code P-M,Dllnl Ql.(` 11 n7 A-- 4 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 requirements. Avenida Fernando should be 50 feet wide and it is 36 feet. Avenida Obregon should be a 40-feet street and it is 20 foot fire lane. How can you control impact on health and safety, when you have the traffic disaster that currently exists when the Resort cannot control or regulate what is there. What happens when a two mile an hour car runs over a child because you have back out parking? All the parking spaces are back out parking. Every parking facility does not comply with the Zoning Code. You do not have back out parking spaces on a fire lane. He asked that the Notice of Dangerous Condition that he filed with the City is submitted into the record. He almost kitled a child on a roller blade jumped out in front of him and he banged his head on the steering wheel when he was traveling ten miles an hour. Need to make legal findings that the CUP complies with zoning as well as CEQA findings. The foundation for this project was built on an EIR done in 1975. You do not evert know the impacts of all the water that will be going into the ground. Finally, what are the impacts on the surrounding residents. Follow your heart or follow the law. 16. Ms. Jennifer Jenkins, 49-385 Rancho San Francisquito, spoke on behalf of the 1,600 employees of the La Quinta Resort. These employees live and support the City of La Quinta. The previous expansions of the Resort were a benefit to the City and drove the economy of the City. Increased occupancy will only increase the number of employees the Resort can employ as well as TOT for the City. They have over 2,500 memberships and it is expected that less than 18% have children under 23 and will use the facility. Few of their members will ever use the Pool. Regarding tennis, they opened the courts at PGA West if members were unable to get a court. They are now building a fitness center, pool and tennis courts at The Citrus. All this will alleviate traffic from the Resort. The Resort has been a large part of the City and they would like to request the Commission consider approving this request. 17. Mr. Carl Geist, 50-062 Avenida Vista Bonita, stated he is one member of the Club who does not approve of this project. He understands why the Resort and City are interested in approving this project for the revenue it will generate. It was his understanding that other locations were discussed for the Pool that would not have an impact on the adjoining residents. The quality of life will not be enhanced by this project. He does not understand how the Hotel can promote this project. ❑�\\n/OnnnClOn n1;..,11nn1,1 10 n, A.... 5 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 18. Mr. Joe Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, sated he was confused about what the CUP is compared to what the City Council reviewed. Is the intention to consider the operation of the project. Will this go forward to the Council or is it to be approved at this meeting. Staff stated the Council will hold a hearing on all three applications at their next meeting. This meeting is to consider the CUP only. Mr. Broido asked if the condition regarding the landscaping along Eisenhower Drive and the Bear Creek Bike Path and the maintenance facility would be considered during this permit as well. Chairman Quill thanked Mr. Broido for reminding the Commission of this condition and they will address it in their motion. 19. Mr. Wayne Guralnick, 74-399 Highway 111, Palm Desert, representing the interests of the Tennis Villas, Enclave, The Etados and Mountain Estates HQAs, stated the City Code requires the Commission to make four findings. Three are consistency with the General Plan, Specific Plan and Zoning Code as well as compliance of CEQA requirements. The last finding requires compatibility and not injurious with the surrounding residents. The staff reports just states the conditions will mitigate any issues. This approval absolutely essential to the Resort for the summer and shoulder seasons. However, there is nothing said about this being an entertainment center. This is not to be annexed to a conference center. In Condition No. 24 they are talking about 1,500 people within 15 feet of the Tennis Villas up to 10:00 p.m. at night for several kinds of events creating all kinds of noise. This will be injurious to the adjacent residential use. If they want a water park, then condition it appropriately for a water park and eliminate the convention center. In Condition No. 20 it states it shall be used from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Except for the formal pool, it should not be midnight, it should be 10:00 p.m. as it now exists. Right now they have a formal pool that is used till 10:00 p.m. and is in that same range of location. Let them use that area for the convention facilities, but do not put it in the same location of the activity island adjacent to the homes. Strike out where it says 10:00 p.m. and make it 6:00 pm and strike out where it says midnight and make it 10:00 p.m. and the restaurant hours would be closed from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Condition #24 a similar change needs to be made that the outdoor meetings shall be held within the formal pool and not the active feature water feature. Same on line five where the active water feature is used they are asking that the formal pool area. Therefore, the outdoor activities after 6:00 p.m. would be limited to the formal pool area. Cond@(@O 65 5 n-\\nlOnnrC\Or ,4 n, .,,,,. 6 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 #22 regarding the movies, put the movies shall end at 10:00 p.m. and shall only be shown around the formal pool area. Noise is an issue and how do you monitor noise without having a noise monitor going around telling people to be quiet. In Condition No. 27 they are asking that it be changed to read the active water features causing the noise shall be deleted and the areas and activities causing the noise or violations should be closed. Whatever is causing the noise should be closed. Condition No. 27.C. they are asking that the active water feature have no active or amplified music in the formal pool area. On the noise issue, the City's Noise Ordinance states for noise sensitive areas which this is, for the receiving area not the area causing the noise, it provides that it be 60 dba from 7:00 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. They are requesting a condition be added that there be no public address system, no exterior lighting except the landscaping areas. Deny this application or add the condition requested. 20. Ms. Ruth Utti, 76-946 Calle Mazatlan, stated she is opposed to the application. They bought their Tennis Villas with no anticipation the Hotel would ever make this type of expansion. This will destroy their quality of life and view of the mountains. The residents do deserve respect and listened to. She encouraged the Commission to deny the project. 21. Mr. Jake Baden, 77-471 La Vista, stated good intentions are one thing, but the reality of what goes on is different. He has been reviewing water park magazines lately and what the impact of the water is on surrounding neighbors. 22. Tom Overty, 48-805 Via Linda, stated he was told by someone that lives at the Legacy Villas that they have membership but do not pay dues. They have the right to use the Hotel but do not pay membership. Chairman Quill noted this is not an issue before the Commission. 23. Ms. Lee Charles 79-820 Cetrino, stated she does not understand how the construction activity can take place at the same time the Hotel is operating. Chairman Quill recessed the meeting at 9:20 p.m. and reconvened at 9:25 p.m. 24. Mr. Rick Zeilenga, attorney for CNL, stated he would rest some of the issues raised. In his aerial he noted that most of t1t e� r].%WDnA/ C%Dr 11 n1 Ann 7 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 properties mentioned were as far away as 1000 feet. What needs to be concentrated on tonight is the Tennis Villas and the impacts on those units. The noise consultant they hired studied the three closest areas with 50% of the children screaming nonstop for an hour. This report was not conservative. The study considered the location of where the noise will be received. It then considered the City's Noise Ordinance and it was found there would be no significant increase. In addition to this the noise study considered external noises as well as the internal noise elements. He also considered the pools would be open when they will be closed; the equipment was considered to be open and it will be enclosed; and finally the wave height was reduced and the lazy river recessed. The hours of operation were also not considered at the reduced time limits. They have also agreed to additional conditions to reduce any potential impacts. In regard to the construction noise, construction activities are exempt from the noise concerns raised. Traffic reports have been taken during the prime season of the Resort. The report also showed no increase in traffic. The grove area is being reserved as a safety in case there are any parking concerns. They implemented the new program at the event held this last weekend and the program worked. He went on to review parking, Avenida Obregon pedestrian safety issues, and comparison to other water parks. The landscaping maintenance issues along Eisenhower Drive would also be added to this application. 25. Chairman Quill asked if there were any questions of staff or the applicant. Commissioner Barrows asked about the parking issues raised by Mr. Davis and whether this is a Code Compliance issue. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated it should be reviewed by the Code Compliance Department to make that determination. If the applicant does not respond to complaints called in at the time they are called in, then the problem is not solved and appropriate actions should be taken. Commissioner Barrows asked if the delivery hours are covered in any of the conditions. Mr. McCormick stated 7:00 a.m, is the starting time as well as delivery truck sizes have been relayed to their vendors. Problems arise when their vendors contract with others for deliveries. 26. Chairman Quill asked who should be called at 4:00 a.m. when there is a problem. Mr. McCormick stated it should be their loss prevention person who should respond to the site to solve Pl 0 6 5 7 problem. They have 24-hour/seven days a week securit o 0.1\niDnnnCIDr 11 nl An.. 8 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 handle these problems. Chairman Quill asked that a condition be added to handle this traffic/noise problem on Avenida Fernando specifically in regard to delivery trucks in the Parking Management Plan. 27. Commissioner Barrows stated she appreciates the Resort addressing the landscaping issues on Eisenhower Drive regardless of whether or not this project is approved. Mr. McCormick stated they have already started the implementation process to repair this area. What this project proposes is to expand and enhance the landscaping all the way from the bridge on Eisenhower Drive wrapping down to the maintenance facility which includes ground cover down to the other end and adding a ground cover mix along Eisenhower Drive down to Calle Tampico. 28. Chairman Quill asked that a condition be added to this CUP that a comprehensive landscaping irrigation and fencing plan to resolve problems and improve the appears be prepared for Eisenhower Drive frontage and southern perimeter adjacent to the Bear Creek Bike Path for review and approval by the Planning Commission and encompass all the exterior landscaping to the entire maintenance facility wall. This will include the berm adjacent to the facility and the roadway frontage to the facility along the Bear Creek Path. Mr. McCormick stated they will address the issue. 29. Commissioner Daniels stated his concerns are directed toward the impacts on the surrounding communities. What meetings were held with those communities? Mr. David Urban stated they have met with Mr. Guralnick and the five HOAs. In regard to Mr. Puget and Mr. Davis they are in litigation and are restricted from talking with them because of the lawsuit. Commissioner Daniels stated he is impressed with the plans they have laid out, but is there some assurance the Hotel is capable of self regulations. Mr. Markson stated he reports directly to Mr. McCormick and they do have some training issues and need to add additional personnel. Training is needed to bring their staff to the level needed. Commissioner Daniels asked how Mr. Davis' concerns can be resolved. Mr. McCormick stated they have reduced the hours of deliveries and added people to help manage the deliver trucks. Commissioner Daniels asked about damage caused by seepage from the pools. Is there monitoring required. Mr. McCormick stated they have 22 pools on site and have had no occurrence to date. Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting, stated all the fac(l ,&g G J 8 with this project will be constructed in compliance with all Building r.nmmnnrmor AA; ...... � onno, o I n, Ann 9 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 Code, structural and civil engineers. Swimming pools typically do not seep. Splashing water is not seepage. This may occur in the retention basins, but they are off -site on the golf course. The infiltration of the Pool water is self contained on site in a septic system and pumped away from the site and clear water is infiltrated back into the ground. 30. Commissioner Daniels asked about alternative sites for the pool. Mr. David Urban stated that the problem with the alternate locations is that it will greatly increased cost and displaces rooms back into this area which would be a greater impact on traffic, view and same kind of noise concerns. In evaluating the alternative site, the cost was greater than the return. Commissioner Daniels asked about what events are currently occurring. Mr. McCormick stated they have been holding events up to 1,500 persons and there have been some complaints about the music, but the events are shut down by 10:00 p.m. Commissioner Daniels asked about changing the times and moving the events to the formal pool area. Mr. Urban stated this was discussed and determined it was not an option they could agree to. They would be amenable to shutting down all functions at 10:00 p.m. Commissioner Daniels asked about the elimination of music and outdoor lighting. Mr. Urban stated their concept of this project includes music distributed throughout the site on small speakers to contain the noise generated from the music. They have implemented numerous measures to contain the music/noise on the site. 31. Chairman Quill asked if the existing tennis courts in this area are lighted. Mr. McCormick stated some of they are lighted and are lighted till 9:00 p.m. 32. Commissioner Daniels asked about the sale of the Hotel. Mr. Urban stated that CNL Hotels and Resorts is being purchased by Morgan Stanley. Any of these obligations they are entering into would be bound by the entity purchasing the Hotel. 33. Mr. Puget stated he is not in litigation with the Hotel and would be available to hold discussions with the applicant. 34. There being no further public comment Chairman Quill closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked for Commission discussion. d 0 0 6 J 9 r4\A/DnnrC\Dr ee:m �.nn\onn7\9 11 n9 A_' 10 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 35. Commissioner Engle stated he believes this is a good project and believes with the strict conditions imposed, he is in favor of the project. 36. Commissioner Daniels stated that between the staff report, minimizing the impacts, he is satisfied with the answers received from staff and the applicant, he supports the project. 37. Commissioner Barrows asked where a condition could be added to the revised Condition No. 7.C.1.a. and e. addressing loading, shipping and other related activities and any third party is bound by this condition. What is the enforcement side of this; whose responsibility is it? Staff stated the applicant is to undertake this responsibility and if not done, the City can revoke or modify the CUP. Commissioner Barrows asked about Condition No. 11 to clarify whether it is "logs" or "reports" (highlighted in blue). Staff stated they would fix the condition. Commissioner Barrows asked about Condition No. 20 to adjust the hours to 10:00 p.m. Community Development Director Doug Evans stated the applicant's intent is that the formal pool area operates from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. He does not believe they want to limit the hours of the restaurant to 10:00 p.m. Commissioner Barrows asked about Condition 22 in regard to the movies should it state what months in the rest of the year movies can be shown. 38. Chairman Quill asked that the Condition regarding Eisenhower Drive shall be approved by the Planning Commission and the maintenance facility and berm should be added. 39. Commissioner Alderson reiterated the direction given by the Council and he believes that direction was followed by the applicant and staff. To him it does not make sense that this is a good business move; however, if it fails, what would happen to this "white elephant" and it has been proven to him that this company is a viable company that would resolve the problem. He went to Arizona and visited the site and found that their employee rate stayed higher and the occupancy rate was increased. The customer base was from the citizens of the area who took their children there for the entertainment. This has put to ease a lot of his concerns. He does not agree this will add traffic to the site as people will walk to the pool and not drive. Having a backup traffic study being done after the fact will not resolve anything. He initially did not support this project, but based on his review the cooperation of the applicant, he will support the ro'l n.1m10nnrcicr en�.........�onmw I a m a..,. I Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 Community Development Director Doug Evans stated that regarding the City's Noise Ordinance (Condition No. 27) the City's Noise Ordinance is not specific to any part of this project. The HOA attorney raised the point that the active water feature causing the noise ordinance violation. The CUP should not restrict the noise ordinance to apply to only parts of the project. Staff would recommend activities as suggested. City staff will enforce problems according to whatever is causing the noise. 40. Chairman Quill stated he too believes the applicant has gone a long way to mitigate the impacts and believes there will be other projects demolished and replaced with different things similar to this as time goes on. 41. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Engle to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-01 1 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2007-102, as recommended and amended: a. Condition Added: That a comprehensive landscaping, irrigation and fencing plan to resolve problems and improve the appearance shall be prepared for the Eisenhower Drive frontage and southern perimeter adjacent to the Bear Creek Bike Path and maintenance facility on Avenida Carranza for review by the ALRC and approval by the Planning Commission as a Business item. The plan shall be implemented and completed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Signature Pool facility. b. Condition No. 7.C.1.a amended: Traffic flow, loading, shipping and other related activities and parking control on Avenida Fernando. C. Condition No. 20 Amended: Operating hours for all outdoor uses, features, and activities not defined as an Active Water Features, shall be: 8am to 10pm, except for the formal pool, which shall operate: lam to 10pm. The restaurant hours shall be 7am to midnight daily. d. Condition No. 22: There shall be no evening movies between the Monday following Thanksgiving and the 2nd Thursday of March of each year. When permitted, the movies shall end by 10pm. 11 n7 A-- 12 Planning Commission Minutes February 27, 2007 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Daniels, Engle and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. General Plan Consistency Finding; Consideration of a finding of General Plan conformity for the City of La Quinta's potential acquisition of property for approximately 29.9 acres of land for the construction and operation of affordable housing and that a portion of the property would be developed for commercial/retail uses for the property located on the south side of Highway 111, east of Dune Palms Road. 1. Chairman Quill opened the Public Hearing, Community Development Director Doug Evans presented the staff report a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-012 finding General Plan conformity with the acquisition of the property located on the south side of Highway 1 1 1, east of Dune Palms Road, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Daniels, Engle, and Chairman Quill. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VIII. CORRES 0NDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: IX. COMMISSIO ER ITEMS: A. Commissi er Daniels stated he would not be able to attend the next meeting. t was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Alder n to excuse Commissioner Daniels. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Engel to adjourn this regula eeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission t be held on March 27, 2007. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourne at 10:44 p.m. on March 13, 2007. Respectfully submitted, 000662 r-M/DnnrClDr ne,...,+-%Innaw 1a ,n A.... 13 03/02/07--17:09 FAX 213 624 0174 --- DEXETRIou,ET AL- -- - ATTACHMENT #13 JEFPRLY Z S. SPRINGER .Sn7HEN A DEL GUERM MrHAM- A FRAN= REGINA LRX=S COBS JOMN E. WO(:LM 6PoAN D. IANGA J6 MWM T.TAGGARr TAMMY M. A HONG DEMETRIOU, DEL GUERCIO, SPRINGER & FRANCIS, LLP Ce - 1 �I ATTDRNEYSATLAW Catty 1 Sol SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, 10TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES. CALJFORNIA 90017.4613 , e♦ C2196246407 cum G. UHMER710U 11sts.Is 1 RONALD J. DEL GUERC10 Q2 mmal RICHARD A DEL GUERIXo IRMFM01 CAI March 2, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE and FIRST-CLASS MAIL (760) 777-7101 Donald Adolph, Mayor Members, City Council . CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Dear Mr. Mayor and Councilmembers: FAX (21X6240174 W W W.DDSFFIRM.GOM SENDERS CMARAOOREM JSPWHOER4)D5rAM.00M MAR - 5 2007 This firm represents Richard R. Fredericks, the owner of the single-family residence located at 49-875 Avenida Obregon, La Quinta, California. Recently, Mr. Fredericks became aware of CNL Desert Resorts, LLP's ("CNL") application for approval of the Le Quinta Resort & Club Signature Pool ('Water Park*). The proposed plan for the Water Park will clearly overburden Mr. Fredericks' access rights along Avenida Obregon. It is therefore Imperative that the City of La Quinta ("Cibn refrain from approving such. Should the City permit the Construction of the Water Park, we will file a complaint against the City for inverse condemnation for the taking and damaging of these private property rights. Mr. Fredericks' residence is situated on Avenida Obregon immediately south of La Quinta Resort & Club ("Resort"), between Avenida Fernando and Calle Mazatlan. Mr. Fredericks' title to his property includes an easement for ingress and egress on Avenida Obregon and it is this right of access that Is presently in danger of being damaged. A. Mr. Fredericks' Access Easement Originates from the Subdivision Plan of 1928. Mr. Fredericks access easement on Avenida Obregon dates back to 192�yrtt+ Walter H. Morgan ("Morgan"), the famed developer of the La Quinta Resort, laid �iy){{ � JJ C7 plans for a subdivision of a large parcel of land in the vicinity of the Resort. In May 03/02/07 _ 17:09 FAe 213 624 0174 -- DEMEMIOU,EP AL_ 0003 Donald Adolph, Mayor Members, City Council CITY OF LA QUINTA March 2, 2007 Page 2 1928, he recorded a subdivision map In Book 8, Page 90 of Records of Survey of Riverside County (hereinafter, "1928 Record of Survey"), attached hereto as Exhibit "A." The 1928 Record of Survey depicts lots numbered 1 through 36. Mr. Fredericks' Property is Lot 24, situated on Avenida Obregon. Mr. Fredericks' Property was one of the first lots sold; it was conveyed to Mabel G. Carruthers in October 1928.' The grant deed expressed Morgan's plan for subdivision, and imposed a number of restrictions reflecting that plan. Three other lots fronting Avenida Obregon were also sold in 1928 and 1929, namely Lots 33, 34 and 35 2 Excepted from each lot was the area within Avenida Obregon, "to be used for road purposes." Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is a 1934 aerial photograph depicting Avenidas Obregon and Femando, and the Resort Carruthers' house Is on the extreme left, facing a dearly defined Avenida Obregon. Avenida Fernando Is on the right hand side, providing access to the well developed orange groves on both the north and south sides of the street. Further, Morgan's own residence, commonly known as Walter Morgan House," evidences the apparent use of Avenida Obregon before the recordation of the 1928 Record of Survey. The Walter Morgan House was designed by Gordon Kaufmann, the one and the same designer of the Resort, and was constructed in 1926-1927. Attached here to as Exhibit "C" is a copy of Primary Record from Department of Parks and Recreation, State of Carifomia, the Resources Agency. The House has been designated as a City of La Quinta Landmark for its historic and artistic values. It underwent few superficial alterations on the interior, and the original exterior of the house is intact. The structures fronts Avenida Obregon, with the driveway access to that road Thus, Morgan's own residence evidences that Avenida Obregon was well In use before he recorded his plans for subdivision. A conveyance from the grantor necessarily carries with it, by operation of law, an easement for access across all of the lands of the grantor that were used as roads at that time. (Civ. Code § 1104.) Accordingly, the original deed from Morgan to Caruthers carried with it an easement for access along Avenidas Obregon and Fernando. Subsequent conveyances of title to Lot 24, including- the conveyance to Mr. Fredericks, carried with them this easement right for road purposes. ' " Morgan was the president of Desert Development Company, the grantor of the We to Carruthers, which carried out Morgan's subdivlslon plans.- 2 Today, the Resort owns the Lots 33, 34 and 3-5 Lot 35, In particular, is the historic residence. commonly !mown as. 'La Casa.' nn A 03A 07 17:09 FAX 213 624 0174 — DEM MIOU,ET AL 0004 — Donald Adolph, Mayor Members, City Council CITY OF LA QUINTA March 2, 2007 Page 3 B. The Resort's Lots Fronting Along Avenida Obregon AM Contained an Exception for Road Purposes. Morgan's intent to preserve Avenida Obregon from lot owners' claims of fee simple In the road is apparent. In fact, Desert Development Company s grant deed to the Resort's predecessor in Interest, La Quints Properties Company, specifically excepted Avenida Obregon from the conveyance_ Attached here to as Exhibit "D' is a true and correct copy of the grant deed dated 1937, from Desert Development Company to La Quints Properties Company. That grant encompassed a large tract of land surrounding Mr. Fredericks' and the Resort properties, and that portion of the land containing Avenida Obregon is described as 'Parcel 2."3 The legal description of Parcel 2 contained the following exception: Also excepting from said Property an easement over the portions thereof shown as roads on said Record of Survey above referred to. The record of survey "above referred to' is described in the deed as the "Record of Survey on File in Book 9, Page 65 of Records of Surveys, Records of Riverside County, Califomia' C1930 Record of Survey'). A true and correct copy of that Record of Survey is attached hereto as Exhibit "E.' This Record of Survey is dated 1930, and is substantially identical to the 1928 Record of Survey. Avenida Obregon was one of the roads shown in both the 1928 and 1930 Records of Survey. Thus, the deed from Desert Development Company to La Quints Properties Company contained an exception for a road easement over Avenida Obregon_ Accordingly, La Quints Properties Company acquired title to Avenida Obregon subject to the easement. As a result, all of the subsequent conveyances, including the conveyance to the Resort, did not convey fee simple title, but instead conveyed Avenida Obregon subject to the easement. The Water Park will substantially increase the Resort occupancy, and the traffic on Avenida Obregon will be even more intolerable than it already is. Since 1997 when the zoning change reduced the northern portion of -Avenida Obregon to its present substandard width, (approximately 20 feet), the travel on the road has been difficult, of course, excepted from this tract of land are Mr. Fiederfcks' lot (Lot 24), Le Casa premises (tot 35), David Llewellynt lot (Lot 34) and Gyms Peirce's property (Lot 33) as they were aft conveyed separatery to different individuals. However, as stated above, the Resort is fhe titled owner of Lots 33. 34 and 35, and the Resort acquired these lots also subject to road easement over Avenida Obragon. WWI 03/02107 17:10 FAX 213 624 017-4 - DEMMIME3t_AL Q005 Donald Adolph, Mayor Members, City Council CITY OF LA QUINTA March 2, 2007 Page 4 frustrating and dangerous. Avenida Obregon is already heavily congested with slow moving golf carts, service vehicles making deliveries to the Resort, and pedestrians who cross the road to and from various Resort facilities on either side of the road with little regard for the vehicular traffic. The City has previously been notified of such hazardous conditions of Avenida Obregon in Mr. Fredericks' Notice dated May 31, 2006. The construction of the Water Park can only add to the already difficult and dangerous conditions of Avenida Obregon. This added burden on Avenida Obregon will render travel on that road unreasonable to the point of obliterating Mr. Fredericks' property rights. Furthermore, a gate that is conditionally required to be constructed on Avenida Obregon would clearly obstruct Mr. Fredericks' access on Avenida Obregon to the north. Of course, the above impacts to the existing, already congested, Avenida Obregon would apply to any project that would increase the traffic on Avenida Obregon. Accordingly, In the event the project applicant proposes changes In the project, please be advised that any project which results in additional vehicular and pedestrian traffic would necessarily have the same consequences. Thus, the City's approval of CNL's application for the construction of the Water Park, or any other project that substantially increases the burdens upon this private roadway, would result in the taking and damaging of Mr. Fredericks' property rights. Ill. Conclusion. Accordingly, the City must deny CNL's application for the Development Permit and prevent construction of the Water Park. If the City does approve the Water Park construction, we will institute an inverse condemnation action, and seek a writ of mandamus. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. VPry tndv vnurs_ JZBS/bmr Enclosures cc: Richard R. Fredericks (w/ Encl_) Brand Cooper, Esq. (w/ Encl.) Martin Mueller, Esq. (w/ End.) Julie Rosser, Esq. (w/ Encl.) Tammy M. J. Hong, Esq. (w/o Encl.) 000666 03/-09/07 17:10 FAX 213 624 017d< DEMEIRIOU-,W AL Q 006 _- se 4 14 a 3t A: A I °a .w �-V rr • - T r i —__ I DO SA a� .I • i i IRS 8 / 90 7 W o�� J � _ zQo � .0 03j2 a- arm �aw =o0 0 ul ocoo q�4j W U wag AU 9ce§ �> go a 0 ,a,� wwm,m�o w..a awro w. www N y w.a,,.ww.a xy aw�odw�m EXHIBIT "A" � i � '.: i I � I I 1 i 1 � �� I �� I i� 1' .� I - , l ��, �I � f , �I L� � �' l r �1 I � i .' � :-r I A� �� _ :.� � I � � �� f- � r :S i i _ - . r.� ss l it 2F i � � t� y ��r. --69L0.2/07 17:11 FAX 213 624-01.74 DEMMIOU.ET AL — 1@008 = "O I 00066q ,=b3/02/07 17:11 FAX 213 624=4174 DEKnWIDU.ET AL^ _ �^ Q 009 M idgpmild ... tfRNPSmalsttoitp $S . Page __L_of 3 1 'Rasaaee Name or is Walter Morph Home P11- Other idomfw.. ' aP3. Location: ❑ Not fee PdAeadan ❑UWWWk%d aCouDhq RMI— aide bb. uses 7.5• oudd La Oninta nee. 1980 T 8S Dr N 06E . JW 114 of ou4 of sae L6_ s. Address ._.494" Eisenhower DOe clew La_Qttinta d. UTae: (Give more than one for torso and/or anon feanre) 2ana • Intl a. Other Laeadonef can: 1e.9, Parcel sa A, legal deript)op, dfo leeetions resou rce, elevation, additional Dues, eta, as I aP3a. Dworfl ion: (Describe resource NO lta maJw alwnar119. tnehede daslgn, Mof elah, ooadltion, atreradohs. size. seafng, an boundaries.) This Spanisb Colonial Revival style house with Monterey jtifluences is situated at the northwest end:if the La Quints Hotel and Resort property, just north of the Tennis flub pool. Designed by Gordon Kaufts n, it was built in 1976-27. Its ground plan is rectangular, with a projected room at the first floor western elo Mon- A two-story building, oriented on a nord"outh axis, with a garage structure at its northeast corner, it side -gabled, with red the roof, deeply overhanging eaves aid exposed ratters- The walls are adobe c wered. with plaster. The front of the house (east elevation) has a slightly projecting north bay Containing fo Mal entry, a single door with a wide fasela stucco surround with a� detailing at lintel topped by a simpl entablature. Above etdry, at second story level, is a T or decorative Ole vent. The soutltem contains at second story level a French door which opens onto a str ow balcony with wrought iron railing supporting entablature. At the northern curd of the eastet4 f4cade, a single story, building with a po covered by a shad roof supported by square fiolumns extends to the ast. The extertsion has a window in the ddle of its south facade. (See Continuation Sheet) 011`30. Resources Andkdn: (List SUdW as and Codes) aP4. fteawreas PraaMs NBuilding ❑Sirdoara •p11. Report Claden, (fits alailap rhrpontfothar sobroae or 'normal `Attasheesnts: ❑NONE 0Location Map ❑Sketch Map ❑A,beeuiatiditoord ❑Distrist Record ❑Linear Feature Qphowgraph Raeofd ❑Other WAR) b Bementof ID&Mat ❑Other (Isolates, otca P5h. Description of Photo; M , dace, etc.) Both aP7. Owner and Address: 5¢-149PGA Blvd. La ipLa CA 92253 P--Private -Pa. Recorded W. Name• affiliation. address) Pam O'Conaor/Marey R and Associates versl CA -Pa. Dore Recorded! / ep10. Survey Typo:ibecr4ibe) lion Sheet afluitdag. Si enze and Jbitlect Record sntian Reemd ❑ Rock ArtRecord ❑ fae[tit Oe cl 10 PPR 522A 111951 EXHIBIT "Cis 03/02J07 17:12 FAX 213 S" 0174 DEMETR-IOU,EP AL -- 0010 Pa0s _ 2 of-3 r slisesuew phtw,s or #- gl, Historic Name: — 61. Compton Name::' 63. rlrieNtd Use: yM •NRHP swtus Cods " Ihas" Use- -SS. •SS. Atomo4oar t71s. -- eBs. eonsomMoo f wWW leenewedee data. ■aor.serts and Go ref by local aaftsmCn WO in 197.E-27, this lulus was designed by local tmnufacture. The exterior of the house is intact; interior has few, aupotf CW alterations, •07. Mwsdt ■No ❑Vas t3Unkwwn Cdtoc 0`191 dLoeedm: *Be. adated rsemrset age. Ardrieeae �C"rgwm K'tubm _ _. b. Btra . solo. Sio e. Tnome — R,sei$eneC AppGcaWa Criteria I Period of Sien(ftemnce 192(r27 hapsny TV"-- mW pssnnide Pepe_ Aim, Wdnss NU Nrrosrtsrree in tsrps of elsta dif of ercNbceffd COMM es" by dams, p*d d. The Wales' Morgan Douse appears eligible for drsignation as a City of La Qtiinta Landmark under C. t.e., it embodies distinctive ebaracteristics of a style, type, peiod or method of construction, is a exatr�le of the use of indigenous materials or .craftsmanship or is tepresaNve of a notable work r acclaimed builder, designer, or architect. The house also appears eligible for the National Register places lacwader"Criterion C.. i.e., it embodies sthe distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or met er construction, or that represent the wort of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that rap: significant and distinguishable taltity whose Wmponems may lack individual distinction." Located ( attskirts of the La Qoiata Hole] pmPerty, the house was designed in the Monterey style and sited t complement the desert landscape and the regions climate, factors which led to the evolution oin ff a e Style" desert lifestyle. The structure possesses a high degree of architauural Integrity the work of prominent Southern Callfouda architect Gordon Kaufmann. aufma. The house may also be eli the National Register under Ctitedon B for its association with Walter Morgan, developer of the L Hotel. B11. Addltiata( Resource AUfa7lnes-. (List attrikKn" and oodsal 'BIZ, Retarertoss: at3. Ramstke: •ala.Evsivaton, PamO-Camwr Dees of Evslua0sn: 19W, for arfimd oa.enmtte.t (Sketch Map with sod, show of an Historic id of the e of for 623E _ 03/02/07 17:12 FAX 21J24 0174 DL IOU.L AL �Q011= 84�:��1tld .•�'',E�byiyl�. ti��• {Rp.R .. :,• 'x' . Up ri hW+•,-�r.._u -Date 0/ iCamimuilon I ❑Updna •Reowdsd by Cpn7rnr ar�Y Moth Pfae _ °t -�— House •Rasa ,. Welter Mo pia. (�,) The house's south elevation has an wactior cbimncy topped by a decorative finish vc file vents and brick crown A shed roof with red tiles covets a porch and rests on a wood beam supported by three heavY Boric eolutomi ndow on ih'mnts si to aide at first floor level by two doors It sewed floor level by a casement The west elevation (rear of the building with view towards mountains) has a balcony among lens facade at second story level, with square wood slatted. railing and wood posts su �b�ch at rc and exposed rafters on underside of balcony. At aecond floor. French doors open onto northern end, white two and .asen=K windows Occur at arse easement casement wind wo stts in mild t first floor, French u< ocaair at the northern The twer Of tth elevation has casement windows with uupainted wood sash at second floor level, toppep wood Pig to the eaves. First floor north elevation has a door at east and and three itregularl placed casement windows. A low wall extatdung north from the west end of facade, partially� a courtyard formed by north wall of maba »dins, northern R oro�shed he fed arcade third low wall running east -west. Features of the courtyard west wail of the garage, tile -faced circular gutter openings below the flat roof of the west elevatii and a fireplace built into the northern courtyard wall. The exterior of Morgan House retains its historic fabric and character -defining features in their entirety. ltrteriors of the house also retain their original ongfiguration and most of the original fn urn.<. ,••+ Of 03/02/07 17:12 FAX 2L"24 0174 DEMRIOU,ET AL DLSLP.t D14ELOPl�fr COMFANT ) GRdSf ➢bE➢ U.5_]•R•C. 12.50 Cancel ad. TO L1 yvDZiA RT VZTT1ES W AMYCoU ) OC9N➢1' OIytLOpNFhT COYPAV7, s eospOratloa, o-ganlieG under the fare of the State of Cellromia, situ its Prlbalpnl place of buss ss itLEE lldaratt California• and B. y• BRAWn, HT011"R for 0aVert pavalg9medt Copspany, iLOU 3eilers 1#19.001 to thou is hand paid, mucipt or .hlah is homey ackcawl*dgod, do hereby grant to k 4USNTTA PRownIES CW>:8R7, a corporation, whose 7 Seaadd terdarv$' to 1030 Security suilding, Loo-AA8e165. Celitord)e, a of the Groat." 1n and to ibe real prepo'r1y 10 the county or Riverside, State of California, deaorl"d as In the Godshall* Valley Ce etsry olstrlet, GCaa7lallp}9slle7 Coonty Water Elatrict, Coachella Valley Mosquito Abstgm@%t District, Casahell+ 11ay Storm Water OSstriat' County of Riverside, Stets Or Gdlltoro-fs, bad d000rlbod se follows; Tile Southwest quarter or the Seuth9o4t quarter of Ivsgt1Me1 esetlon ad, Township a South, pang. a Root. San seroerdita Meyidlsa, as dhow by inited Stotts 009neaps0at Survey; glps"rild Thoretrops the rapt 30 rest thereof of onate7d to the County or sivnraida, by Dena retarded November 3, 1920, in Rook. 654pagt so Of Dodds, rep Drug or Riverside County, C411f0clAul "So L2ON1?IN0 theraftbp an emollient for public highway and Pullin utility purposes over the partied thereof aomeyad to thr Cavity at RSTersidt by USES retarded ►sbrdery 16. 1954, 10 Book 263 Page 521 of orflatai Records, of gala Diveraids County. VARCLL del LL1 that Panted of the Root halt of the Southeast Quarter of rmotlonal Section 36. Township 5 south, &SAME 6 lest, Sap Bernardino Meridian, as show by Wited States GOeerasaat Survey. dasorlbed ae fallowa; figginnll%B 4% the Seasbbost gamer of the Southeast Qbaytar or the said Sowthwac Q1 quarter% Theme %eat Shag the South beupda27 Sine at said Settled 36, 1319.55 Cast to a 1110 section Line of said 3aetion Sol Theme Rartb 0' of vast along +eta 1/16 Section line, 1495 rest' Thence lsot 13ac feat to the Quarter Section line of bald Section W; Thence South 0' 01, Eggs @loon said qusrlsr Sgatlen line, 139$ tact to the Point of boetabieg. Selo proparty in Elsa Shows, upon Regard of durva7 on rill in Naak 9 page 85 or Records of Survey, Reearde of Rlvsrdide County, "literate. LtCDTrW therstraa the following asacrived portions thc"ori- (a) beginning at a point or. avid Quarter Section lino. from which, the 'luarter tq��79. ties, corner an the South bousdery line of sold section 36. team South 0' O1' nest. ' � rest% Those► halt 0.30 toac; Thesce Dort% 0' O1' heat, 616,1 fast; Thence nest 930 toot to Said Quarter SeetleT, lime; ThamS Soutb 0' 01' Ast along sell quarter Section line, 215.1 toot to the point of beDlnnfal: 1b) Beginning at a point od sold Qosrtor Station line which beers Worth 0' Ol' Kest. 250 feet traps the Quarter Station Sotnar an the 504tb boundary of Veld Sectlah 36; Thanes North 0' 01, lilac. 106 test( Thence 'wet 230 feet; lfa Thongs South C' 01' gait, 143 font( Theo%$ test 230 foot to the pslat of bdgtdning; (a) CoaaaPing at a point on the 0actb boundary of Shia Section 36, which beers east 636 foot true, the quarter Section to%aer an the said South boundary or said 6edtion S6; Thone e North 0' oil west, 30446t tar ebb point of beginning; Thant$ continuing North 0' 01' Wwat, a09.go feet; Thenee North 89' 59' ►oat, 356 toots "*ago South 0' 01' Nast, a09.90 toe% to a valet 50 feet North or its South ltdS of data southwest quarter or Section 06: Tranot Nest 363 feat t6 the point of beglanile, %d) Bagtaging at a Roast on gold Quarter Section lids which leers North 0' Ol' tees, 495 feet Crop the quarter Edition "mar ad ebe aauth boundary of said Sectlom 36; Thenee West 230 feet; Tboats North 0' al. 364t. 269.9 feast There. Kist 230 fa.t to laid goarter Soctlon "Rai EXHIBIT feD'F V \\\777 001-2= 03/02/07 17:13 FAX 213-624 0174 —DEMMIOU.ET AL �1-013- 37; •7y j Thence South 0' all East slang lain gdartJ SSeticn line, 229.0 flet'co the palot Or beginotag; lei beginalms at a point on Sold gdart4r S•1 ttdn 114% whlob boars North•06 01' Moat, 208.40 rest from the quarter SgCtlhd cmrad! sa the south bound of 0a44 eacticn 56; Y Keat goo [set to r point in the Canter Line Of ° a0 foot° road; rh0oga at sloe � s the °eater line of Said road, 150 Teat hmee North 9' 01' we j Tnanae Zest AW red% to Nd6 gemrter 3aettOa line; Tbd60d South b• 01' Ztet along said quarter 3datLOn 1LAe, Ise foot to the polo, or 1,661APIRg; 1/ ;,ISO FLCZPTPIO Cram weld prvparCy as ea°emea! over ,fie partlona eb'himeoi 'him S• JY1�` ,cede an said Ses°rd or $arty abos° nXte'red to; x j FARCZL /Sz She +•odth5 to Sear Bernardi= MarfdLen, a ahem by United Stsids Government �� a a0dta. I:sa6e 6 ee.t, Sea i .. >CFAN05L 44: The Cartampt quarter er the Sautilwont quo, at, of ylyetlelzel 0ecc1o8 36♦ Tn6asldP' a South. Rsege 6 Zut- Sam Saraerdlvo RbciMkae. as whom by United States rover®t 1 Survey. /}ARaZL �Oz R Toe Sou4'eeat quarter of US Moreoceat .4'r x dt F1'6atlodsl 8�cll0a 36, T66a+a1p• 5 South, -000 6 Zest. Sam Reraeaaina Lor1MS6M. :h4-6 Dy Pnleed B'leta■ 0ove,ament dungy; �1 ¢ , cr0epfxa0 thererrom ou Beath 3a fist recorde lIstembd La p192LO;hl gmOk 6a conveyed td it* re,sty at Rtrersid° by Rand ra0bigad Mdlsmbe, D. 1pR6 Iu Hook die page be or Deed°, reoardp or aiTmreldo dodney, 0151LT0rRia: AlBD LZCZFTIaO thmtefsoa as "woman Ear public bLgawy abd PUDi1e utility rsrposea over the Damian thereof soavayeg [0 the Codes" of Riccreide bo' peed 7400edtd February 10. 1v36 in Bank gal pogo 700 at Orfielal Reaord° or paid RLvarotda Cooffty. TAR0ZL he; ' II The earths gdas�raot�4M� Weldlso,6re•sho6a byounit" states fty rmlalg e Sodtb. Rang k 30nap: ezcvrm tbarerrm tab Norta 30 test Sod nest 30 fon thereof a, a°naa6Bd t the County at RSver6tde• ay Demo reseeded Moviegoer 3. 1915, in Rook dab Pas Diego, rsdor46 Of River6t44 Ceemtye CallfarnlaR , Lisp ZICEPTING therefrom ae easement for public aigney and public utility -purposes over those portions taardof cmeveyed to the County of Riverside Dy pumas retarded yabruary 16, 1d36, in Rook Bey paiRe tag and BggK ?A* ?to¢El 0t 0fL1Cla11 jUeC6a ct said Rivoretdc County- ' phe So th , The eeucaeest lmttet OF the Bmathgat gmansr of praatimsl Rastdd8 36, 2oeaahipR 5 South, gangs 6 cost. Ben Barmerdin6 dlertALaa, as sham by United Rttts6 P01"r6temt looney: eavayN to the 4honty of ` lux"TNG tbordprdm tut Meat 00 Peet Mereaf as 0records of Riverside, by Dead rms ydad November R, 1,go in Book 655 page. as of haBds, Riveroide County. California; an easnOT Pub edC Plic ay6or 1 and pdblip Al. o ZFAWTMO tDerertea 410 l Tteordedj purposga aide the portion thereof s+heaypd to %be Coauly of Riverside. by Uasa February la. IV" in Book 263 Dace 6R1 Ot Official Rewords of sold R1TIVOLT4goeftCduaey. PA�nZL �0• pi S ReutI, Rang, O Zast, I Thu Northwest quarter tilt Y atL= $16UN o+(z4maeatpsla'veyi Son B°rnerdleo Meridian. er ah0 a bf 0a SZCZKING thererree the eouthea+t duerter of "be Kors'aadst quertar or amid Saaeian So. , VANCP. !d. The But halt of tb4 NrtA c4a4t qualar or yrnatlemal stat3an 46, Tom mshlp 3 Sousa Range 6 Sad%, Bah BSO°6rdlao MOTIALna, as-'aRoap by united atvsdp Oersrnmant Suraerl EZGZPrING 'auRRZlAON the south so CW of the east ZO feet teeaear an oonTA"d td the eouhty of RtTOraSdt. Dy Dt1d r44oe4be MaYsmbeY 3: YPBb io Rook Me page •68 of ,.ode, retard+ of Riverside County, Calttblllde. P.EMIL t10. r too Bou%hgsit quarter of ToznagiP' The portbnat Auater a Ae�lnO Yir1a1 &a sham bycm U61t44 State overat 6 r j a 6ddtb, Rana :art, ; euneyt 0:03PTING tao"frdm sae Let 30 fees tatreaf es WATOW to the County 0 ' Riverside. by Dud regarded Morombsr 5, 192B in Bode a56 Page tie of D,�Rde. Record � Ntrerm14a Cowry. CalLforoit. 03/02/07 17.13 FAX-YL3 624 0174 --:D METRIOU.BT AL OV t .1i,i J2S1 �7 5 FnXGRL !ul at clevirr of Sopth All th'! portion llots 6 Yaet1 naof -the 602hv Xarta'LNP •46 ah,v,G by VaLtrd mtatc. QQ-efaaeht- 5 downy, dsadrlba4 as rOLLO101 wfilon C®enelAa at • point an the ru9tsrly-114a of sell Malingetf5tquarter from Lb, SVuthoest corner thereof yearn SprSlf OOr O31 LPYL. TKWA04 mouth e9- 59, vast, 722 test i4r the point Of beginning. Tbepe4 ameb 00' 01' last and ps"i1s1 With the Rest time df Saito bouthweat quarter 67 f44ti - Themc4 $Ruth 694 591 Toot. is reeii Th"*j 6ortb 000 01, West. s9 te4t4 ThOuto Rdrtb 89Y Or Radt, 16 f4at 49 th" potat of Rfgibblagi IICMWM dpiD gXSRR7AG L6e,yepyab'S64ptmerA ty.Ehs4 64 r,etae frm %Isla pe,#T-ea, W63on p,to is aissrs laehss of Indur slow to vmtsbod to'WAMV"* d� yiro,•gY"dgat or cnergg through Gmate" distrybut4m AMC" to pre011464 of Grouter" Od c�g6aa wall, m reserved In 0644 rpm Water K.•ifdrgad at or to Dowart Deeulupeowd y. n Of WOVporgtiun, "Gerald Ray 16, 1931, 14 look my pepie ln4 of 6yyloisi findOt9A giverrl40 County. Ca11fo"la. FkRCXL pg. r rf The southwest quarter of the sguLhwset gmit4r of yaaalCld M1. WSta�sn Cog,CS$ AL 6 Santa, Mason 7 East. 6m lelO6rdlaPram, Pa anon by surrey: g]CEI TTDIG tDn"trou the moplp 50 £sit and Xsnt 70 fast therWaf tavlu0at 1P puD11t hlgbwers. Said property to slog ahousu an L4o0assd-1e31d GUmIYnr'S RaP an rLt La is look 9 page 4 or Records of Surrey. iwca"D Of Rleersids Caomt.. ed"torpie, +. ti rheum. 113. The Northeast gmrtsr Or the vowibaeK quarter of Fxactiapsl election 31, TOW"' Ship A south, Lug. 1 lost, van D4"ea4yoO eterldlAa, as -Peen be 94111414 Staraa OO.aruwaat 3ar•ey7 =jrTiM tharafycw the North 34 feet end West 50 foot the"dr included 1n public Nighe47a• eeid property is slag ehoun Oft Licawedd Land Surss7or"9 NOV on file in luck 91 two. 4 of dedardo of Surrey, "Cord, of gtv-erolds Cepaty. cwuroveela. Mom Ilan The pigrthgest quarter of the smthwtt masher of Yrwdtlspal searLlon 41, Toym- Shlp 5 ocutle, Rouge 7 lost:, San 6erserdlaa Ysrldian, sa or. by DnLt�. But. Goverment 3urv47: - XxcVTlthe"rem the Borth w rest the"sr iarWed in pdblie 1110Ift aC yl 1L30 yr VMNO tho"fpos the portion the"vf amperes to the County of Xltersida ray rood purp"4e, by Dowd "worded. D40aWe.r le, 1950 in look 862 page 154 of Deeds. records of Riverside County. cal LfbrPls. said property is also eleven an Unnamed Loud surveyor-6 pimp on file in omit 9 Pegg 4 at Regards of survey. Sonoran of Rbwrvide OOmty. Cel1t9ynk,. FARCRL Ulm: The boethoast quarter or the Dauthaaat quar%wr at f"etlsaal Setting 71, 9uwaahip 5 voutN, games 7 Rest, San Barbarat" R'arM4an, as abORh b7 United 6tdjsk Gavarment S.S.gyr apgpTl G'"O"from the Smth 30 f%" rh*"Dt LaeLd44d is pdblta hiaharVe kl= lD lMAC therefrom the parttod thereof declared to Era County of Rlveralda for road psr9cees, b7 Deed raOOMfia D401WOOr is, 1930 In Book g69 pose %54 of Damon. records of Riverside County, C11th"'15. said praperty is also shown ad Licensed Load Sura4YOr'e YAP as rill in bank 9 Pegg 4 of Became or sgrray, records of XSvgralda County. Callfamis. FARCI , #14: The southwest Sooner or Fractional Scotian 3" TwA■1117 5 mouth, Raamo 7 past, See sarasmino Mortal", so Bevan by 9nLt1a-Stdtea amerdsebt gurr,Yi XXcwptlpg tNararrom the North 60 riYr, Soeth 30 feet end Seat s0 !set the"of im.l,.d.a in punka btgbveysi ltao v=XPTINC she"ftus the portion thereor omvvygd to the County of Rlrarsids, :or reap purpdset, by Deed recerd4d'p:ennbgr id. 1950, SA Hoot 657 page 124 of Deeds, remr4s or m"ralds deadly. Celitoe¢Se, spin property is klWO--eh4Wn an J,14411spd Land Sarv4727'S Rag om file in Book 9 Pegg 4 of Records Of 5urra7, "s4rdr ur RLvAratdW County, C411t0tA1e. ', Bt.WM to a leaps dated Nab4abdr•.30y lge9 odd rsaor4ad DraaabeA O. 1929, Le Back 14 pegs 113 or ieassa, "cords of Rtibr/LM County, CJfLU0iRie, ay WLlab CONrt W r� a co. atiop LMS4g to The Sauthotc-B{ar"a'Fp i ConDa49' 4 M Cora.rut-. t Caao.r-.psay. "-1 Mae egrp.rn =l dn, a asr:aln panel or Land to D4 used for su0`et4tlam and no).aeary oiild400 :>r o tor::: 45 714Ta from November 30, 1919. to Naeeaer 50. 1974, to. OR Samuel 03/0,2/07 17:13 FA%213 624 0174--DEMMIOU,ET AL -�D15 (raimi 11,41WI State of CallroveLh I A1D11e i Cauaty of Los aM41"I'as. 10.17, Dafore me, Kadd,11 Jf. Eahhe , a Notozy Da tnie P6tn mW °t 4711. eraowlly appeared Cyrus It Tae, knptn to to too la and for Bald aeanty, p to sm to ma She So.r.Wvy Or Dede7t DaveLopaent pnaidant evd a. 0.6, Jackson, NIIOem d rpti plag tnstraaent, and knew Company, tlo o&Tp&retton clot wanted tN& wltbin ap hahelt of tbo eorpdretion ca m< to be the revolve ono exae&tad tba •Ethic 1M CrWMh: the aMo. Wart to named, and saiave1od6ed to ae that such Corporation aresdta VITOWS wy hand cad official Goal;ampoll P. 6po116". Natat•J panite !a Mod for cat lNorA+1LlL SULI Do00ty and state. state of Ca1lToenw. I PdD11C County of Las wDSateMlae• a SouTy Ov this Path day or 10r11, 1k3t, befera no, Wessell LJP•Br\Yne�,es Dtaetnr far to and for said Ceuq wp� State, peradnalrY7. m➢➢pa y} the .gasrt Developaan ksoes to no, (or ptaae8 to ae an the sekpaRledgadl tooavathat p.raao .hose name 1s aumaarined to the nttAid Snesromant, he exacetod tha aoa, ee bereadto sac my mood cad atrixad ay Offle"I &sal, IN N1SNrU WMASUP, I ha sad year iC tbls a' shard first above w�h➢hard I N the day Ne6&e11 y. 4 Notary pabltb ta'.aad for said ' (N07ANIAL Sill-1 Coanty and Stets. i Y ill Beaelied uoDle&c1aeB ok Mo. 3Zlvaf o:flalell vaoords ,Page $13 kat ee4�. Aatorde or, Praparties Ca. nieenlaa County, Cellfomlo. Jau% &.. mode. sword or. Fees .13.50 Ca,nporedC Copyist 1. Farratdt CCnp'"r L. Fgsa. 11 000677 03/02/07 17:14 FAX-213 624 0174 = DEM MIMET AL O16 1�19 m Js%,tA FZpsa Fcs.[�.�. qa ,CNENDM MAP W3 S"MMNO PORTION w Tm EAST HALF WEST QUA"ER or SECTION 36 T. 5 5. R. 6 E. 5- 6 8 M. ��.�syW of ihs Asq .e! of 1' ARppyyPWMAM DMADSOM irL% OR Gv1 M"so Rwa C.WT— J w 19f0 A..��/ya�.fp�.N�� Ae/irrYi�Naa✓ f1.�"�lYa++Y//••tl.+M�Ie �wJeM�Nv..w.t 16W �'wh1Ff++iiF/i�w��.Al�y��ar"ny UY �M ,w �..wi wwiN�.vtiwsrl'.v✓�✓��P'.b�wn�w�i'r�� 716r. EXHIBIT " V 03/02/07 17;14-FAX 213 624 0174 DEMETRIOU,ET AL _ t l A %I ,i 4 ,1 1 .; 9 /6 b 00or f;I 03/02/07 17:09 FAX 213 624 0174 = DEMMIOU,ET AL Q 001 JEFFREY i a. SPRINGER 57WHEH A DEL GUM120 MICHAEL A FRANCS REGu1A LAJDmUe COBB JOHN E. MACK&91 SR[AN D. LANGA JENNIFER Y.TAGGARr YAMMYM. A HOM DEMETRIOU, DEL GUER,CIO,,�aRTINNGER & FRANCIS, LLP LAW Sol SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, IM FLOOR LOS ANGEL.E5. CAUFORNIA 90017.4613 r2196249407 CHRS G. DEME7RIOU n9ls lea9i RONALD J. DEL GUFAGo W RICHARD A DEL GUERCIO amyl x➢ FAX (212e24011d wwwDDsFFMM-coM TO: PHONE NO, FAX NO: Donald Adolph, Mayor (760) 777-7000 (760) 777-7101 Members, City Council FROM: Jeffrey Z. B. Springer DATE: March 2, 2007 RE: -a Quinta Resort & 865, Conditional Us1 TOTAL NUMBER OF I PAGES: NOTE TO PERSON RECEIVING TELECOPY: IF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE CALL (213) 624-8407 MESSAGE: Correspondence of today's date. Hand copy shall follow via First -Class Mail. PRIVACY NOTICE contain This message ed intended entia1l or exempt NomIndividual disclosure underwhich applicable Federal or State ssed � If the reader of �anon m that isgeIsn UUI;US0 message Is no the Intended recipient r the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message 1n the Intended reciplent, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly pmhiblted- if you have received this communication in error, please nofiry us Immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via regular U.S. malt. ATTACHMENT #14 Good Afternoon Doug, Please see the attached E-mail. Please pay particular attention to the Demolition and Construction Equipment Source Noise Levels that come from Page 52 of the Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool. I ask that you answer two questions. 1. Could the temporary increases in noise during demolition, excavation, grading, and construction of the new pools and related site improvements be as long as 8 hours a day for weeks at a time? 2. What are the measures that would reduce the potentially significant noise impacts to a level of less than significant? Please answer my questions by return E-mail. Thanks for your help, Ed Mittelbusher 77-333 Calle Mazatlan AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com <httn:://oratwola com/i)romoclk/1615326657x431122724lx4298082137/aol?red ir—http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom> . AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at htto://www.aol.com. ATTACHMENT #15 1. Could the temporary increases in noise during demolition, excavation, grading and construction of the new pools and related site improvements be as long as 8 hours per day for weeks at a time? Construction activities would vary over the 12 month schedule for constructing the proposed new facilities. The operation and use of equipment would not occur for an entire 8-hour day in any single location, but would instead be intermittent, depending on the phase of construction and the type of equipment being used. The first month of activity would consist of mobilizing equipment and materials for the construction process. These activities would not result in noise levels that would be consistent over the work day as equipment and deliveries would occur over the period of a month. The applicant intends for this mobilization to occur in April 2007, based on the assumption the project is approved this month. Demolition of the existing tennis courts, pool, and related site improvements would occur over a two month period in May and June 2007. Site grading would occur in July 2007. Heavy construction equipment would be used during these two phases of activity. As the existing improvements are at ground level, equipment to be used during demolition would likely consist of backhoes, loaders and impact hammers. Grading would involve the use of bulldozers and scrapers, along with backhoes for excavation. When construction equipment is operating during these phases, noise levels will range from 73 to 86 dB(A) at a distance of 50 feet from the location of any individual piece of equipment. Due to the relatively small size of the site, only a small number of these large pieces of equipment could be used at one time. Noise levels around the site would vary during this phase of construction, depending on which construction activities are occurring on the site. Given that these phases of construction activity would occur during the summer, occupancy of the surrounding hotel and tennis villas would be lowest. In addition, during the summer months, windows would be closed and air conditioners would be in use, which results in the buildings providing maximum reduction of noise levels from construction activity. A reduction of noise levels up to 25 dB(A) from exterior to interior would be provided by the residential buildings when the windows are shut', resulting in the periodic noise from the heaviest pieces of equipment operating at the edge of the site being during these phases of construction ranging from 48 dB(A) to 61 dB(A) inside the nearest residential units.. ' Source: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Noise: A Design Guide for Highway Engineers, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 117. 000�? After the site is graded, utility work would occur over the following 4 months, August through November of 2007. Less heavy equipment would be used during this phase, which would consist largely of trenching to allow utility lines to be laid. Construction of the new entry buildings, pools, associated site improvements, such as the pool decks, and the slide features, would occur over the following four months, including December 2007 and January through March of 2008. The heaviest equipment used during this phase of construction would be concrete pumps Primary noise sources associated with this phase may also include diesel generators, compressors, and light truck traffic. Noise levels are typically in the 60 to 80 dB(A) range at a distance of 50 feet from the location of any individual piece of equipment being used. During this time of the year, when windows will be open more, the attenuation from the residential structures would average 17 dB(A)2, resulting in the periodic noise from the heaviest pieces of equipment operating at the edge of the site during these phases of construction ranging from 43 dB(A) to 63 dB(A) inside the nearest residential units. Finally, in May 2008, landscaping would be installed. Equipment used during this phase would include trucks, landscape rollers and compactors, with noise levels in the 65 to 75 dB(A) range at a distance of 50 feet from the location of any individual piece of equipment in use. With this schedule, the new facilities would be available for use by guests in June 2008. Section 6.08.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code addresses noise disturbances from construction noise by limiting the hours of construction as follows: October 1st through April 30th Monday— Friday: seven a.m. to five -thirty p.m. Saturday: eight a.m. to five p.m. Sunday: none Holidays*: none May 1st through September 30th Monday — Friday: six a.m. to seven p.m. Saturday: eight a.m. to five p.m. Sunday: none Holidays*: none Z mid. 000683 The following are the holidays as defined in the municipal code, when no construction activities are allowed: New Year's Day (January 1 st) Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day (third Monday in January) President's Day (third Monday in February formerly Washington's birthday) Memorial Day (last Monday in May) Independence Day (July 4th) Labor Day (first Monday in September) Veteran's Day (November 11 th) Thanksgiving (fourth Thursday in November) Christmas Day (December 25th) In summary, noise levels would vary from phase to phase, and from day to day, depending on where equipment is in use. Because of the relatively short-term to moderate duration of individual construction activities at any single location, and the City's existing restrictions on periods when construction must occur, as well as the incorporation of routine construction noise controls, potential noise impacts from construction in the surrounding residential area are considered less than significant. 2. What are the measures that would reduce the potentially significant impacts to the level of less than significant? There are a number of methods to reduce construction noise to acceptable levels. Some of the methods that would be applied to the project and are typically used for other construction project in the City of La Quinta are as follows: • Stage stationary equipment away from the surrounding residential units and utilize temporary noise barriers or enclosures around staging areas. • Utilize and specify quiet equipment such as air compressors, concrete pumps and generators to be used by the construction contractor. • Place temporary noise barriers at specified locations either around specific construction activities and/or at the perimeter of the construction site to reduce localized noise impact to adjacent residential units. • Construction activity scheduling maybe utilized to limit higher noise level operations to the middle of the day when ambient noise levels are typically at w684 their highest levels to mask the construction activity noise levels, thereby reducing the perceived impact. • Require the construction contractor to submit a noise control plan to be implemented as part of the construction project and process that would minimize the level and time of construction activities. OOQGS5 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee December 6, 2006 ATTACHMENT #16 3. Co mittee Member Christopher stated they did need to weigh the ttributes of the community within and surrounding in order to r Ive the issue. He suggested the trees be moved even to 150 f t apart and tiered down the slope. 4. Commit e Member Bobbitt stated the berms are excessive to begin wit 'but to add trees on top is an over kill. Staff noted that due the excessive berms, staff would be closely reviewing s ecific plans in the future for the perimeter treatments. s. Zamorez stated they would like to request that the placement f the trees be coordinated with the development of the golf co se. Committee Members agreed that it be spaced sporadica y. and not just 150 feet apart. 5. There being no furti er questions, it was moved and seconded by Committee Mem ers_ Christopher/Smith to adopt Minute Motion 2006-034 rec mending approval of Specific Plan 99- 035, Amendment No. as recommended. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2006-865 a request of CNL Desert Resorts, LP for consideration of architecture and landscaping plans for a Signature Pool Facility located on the west side of Avenida Obregon, south of Avenida Obregon, in the La Quinta Resort. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced David Urban of CNL Desert Resorts, and Anne Guillebeaux, EDSA, lead designer, stated they were available to answer any questions. 2. Committee Member Christopher asked what units are privately - owned units. Staff noted the tennis villas and explained where the property locations were on the site. Committee Member Christopher noted there will be an enormous amount of equipment that will create a lot of noise that will need to be mitigated as well as the movie equipment. Discussion followed regarding complaints that had been received about the project. 10 Committee Member Bobbitt stated the noise element will be significant. Mr. Urban explained how the mechanical equipment would function and that a noise study was being required. The movie screen is not a permanent fixture, but an amenity to be used on occasion. Many of the tennis villas, adjacent to the rAMi C' ief a I» n Arctitecture and Landscaping Review Committee December 6, 2006 wave pool, are in the rental pool of the hotel. Planning Manager Les Johnson clarified that the environmental review would be completed before the project was taken to the Planning Commission or City Council. 4. Committee Member Smith asked if there would be a wall separating the tennis villas from the pool area. Ms. Guillebeaux stated there currently is a three foot wall but, they would be required to fence the entire area. It will have a six foot tall fence and access will only be through " the main entrance. Committee Member "Smith stated that in regard to the plant material, he has no concerns. There are some plants that he was unfamiliar with, but since this is private property, the applicant will replace what does not work. He would recommend the_ removal of the Parkinsonia trees as they are thorny and can be a nuisance. Discussion followed regarding the species that were messy and will be high maintenance. 5. Committee Member Christopher asked about the date palms. j Ms. Guillebeaux explained they would not be transplanting any I of the trees, but would be adding new younger trees to the site. 1 6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked that any palm trees used in high traffic area be healthy young trees and special care will need to be taken when any trees are transplanted. 7. " There being no further questions, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Smith/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2006-035 recommending" approval of Site Development Permit 2006-865, as recommended with the removal of the Parkinsonia trees and consider less deciduous trees. Unanimously approved. C. Site 6 evelo ment Permit 2006-874 a request of Komar Investments LLC fo onsiderati0 of architectural and landscaping plans for seven commerce I buildings located on the south side of Highway 111 at Depot Drive 1. Principal`Qlanner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the sta report, a copy of which is on file in the- Community Developmen Department. Staff introduced Keith Pittsfird, SPGA Archite ture and Planning, Peter Brandow, Peter Brandow Q o O 6 8 7 and Associat Landscape Architects, Clint Knox, Project Manager, Vache Hanessian and Jim Brockman with Komar, who gave a presentation on the project.- r:awu+xu c ei arti z nnr 3 ATTACHMENT #17 Carolyn Walker From: Mason Lord Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:01 PM To: Carolyn Walker Subject: FW: Historic preservation commission From: Tennisqutti@aol.com [mailto:Tennisqutti@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:42 PM To: Mason Lord Subject: Historic preservation commission Dear Commission members: Are you taking an interest in the proposed water park project of the La Quinta Resort? I know the Morgan House is slated to be preserved and cordoned off by a fence. I think that this water feature will change the whole ambiance of the hotel and Santa Rosa Cove area. I own a Tennis Villa and will be directly affected by the noise, traffic congestion and intrusion of the fake water slide mountains into the view of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Would there be any impact on the historical significance of the hotel with the building of this water park. Thanks for your in put and response. Ruth Utti 76-946 Calle Mazatlan La Quinta Mailing: PO Box 231203 Encinitas, CA 92023 TEL 760-809-5871 AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 00068's 3/13/2007 Commissioner Robert Wright Historic Preservation Commission 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Commissioner Wright, March 8, 2007 RE: Appreciation History of La Quinta Resort and the Proposed Signature Pool at La Quinta Resort and Club Thank you and your Committee for your outstanding leadership that has preserved the identity ofour city yet allowed positive direction and admirable progress to La Quinta. It was interesting to learn that the City of La Quinta was founded in 1982, 56 years after La Quinta Resort was built, and is the only city in America named after a resort.. We are writing you due to your dedication to serve as an advisory body to the City Council in all matters relating to identification, protection, restoration and retention ofhistoric sites within the City. We are deeply concerned residents that live on the 18' Fairway of the Mountain Course at Santa Rosa Cove. We are also members of The La Quinta Resort and Club. As you know, La Quinta means "Country Retreat" and the La Quinta Resort advertises thq Resort as... "a famous popular destination (escape) world-wide since 1927 ... La Quinta Resort is known for its lush grounds that offers breathtaking beauty and serenity, excellent golf and tennis facilities ..." and continues to mention some famous guests along with additional historic information. The same historic information is also stated on the Guest Activity Marquee posted for group meetings and locations set on the back comer side of the KSL offices across from the Flores Ballroom and Parking Lot. On the enclosed copy of La Quinta Resort's History it tells about the Spanish Conquistadors and mentions that before that time the Cahuilla Indians referred to our area as the "Land ofEternal Sun, " which it is! They state that La Quinta means five and "a secluded country retreat. " Would it be possible for the Historic Preservation Commission to walk around the La Quinta Resort and Club properties and experience the unique and wonderful historic attributes we as a city have inherited, while at the same time considering the magnitude of losing it forever — losing its historic ambient identity by not retaining and preserving this historic site? Could your commission ponder some practical issues as they consider our historic resort ... 1. What will be the effect of the long treasured views of the mountains when they are obliterated? 2. How will the construction activity, for two years, effect the citizens that purchased their properties because of the views, tranquility, and historic ambiance which indeed sets it apart from other resorts in the world 3. Will La Quinta Resort lose its stellar identity? FRM �!-9 'V�s D (� �j g R 2007 4. Should a water park physically dominate and destroy an historic Country Retreat, La Quinta Resort, our city's namesake? We can appreciate the fact that Hilton wants to create activity here in the summer. However, when Hilton purchased the management for twenty years, La Quinta Resort and Club was, and still is, a resort. Resorts such as winter ski areas, beaches, Carribean, etc., expect down periods. With their world-wide web and marketing we have been delighted to see an incredible increase in occupancy this year. People are starved for the type of ambiance that, regrettably, is offered in few safe havens like the La Quinta Resort. We attended the first public meeting regarding the above mentioned waterpark and witnessed many misrepresentations of facts presented by CNL representatives and the CNL Attorney in his closing remarks. (Incidentally, Morgan Stanley recently purchased La Quinta Resort & Club from CNL.) For instance, CNL said they had had meetings to advise owners of their plans for the Signature Pool yet very few received the notice of the meetings until after the fact or had an opportunity to see the plans. The meetings were held in the summer when few were here or even knew about them. We want to preserve the historic value of this area. At the same time we support the Hilton, yet, it is most difficult to understand how something like the water park can be approved to be in the middle of our area when it excludes member privileges. Sadly, and regrettably, we were told that the only way members could take our grandchildren to the water park is to purchase a room so they could use the facility that day! However, we, members, would be allowed to use it along with our children up to age 23 providing they live at home full time. How many children or young adults live in Santa Rosa Cove, Los Estados, The Enclave or Mountain Estates? Also, we were told that the decision is final and that there will be no exceptions Can you imagine what it will be like (after several years of dominating inconveniences and noise) to tell our grandchildren they are not allowed to use the water park when they hear the activity all over our area and even across the street and surrounding gated communities? There is so much more. Thank you for taking your valuable time to review concerns of many of us that are effected. We hope you will encourage Council Members to look at the complete picture so they can vote with a clearer understanding of what was glossed over in the presentations, the impact of loss of an historical landmark known world-wide as a "country retreat," the historic and radical change it will bring to the "world renown La Quinta Resort" which our City is named after. Most Sincerely, David E. and Barbara S. Waddell 49-489 Avenida Vista Bonita La Quinta, CA 42253 TEL 760-777-1176; FAX 760-771-6768 Copy of La Quinta Resort's "Our History" inIft 6 9 0 I.a.,QUHIta Kesort ana LAUD I ADout La vDinta I History Page 1 of 2 RESERVATIONS . PACKAGES - TEE TIMES - GALLERY - PRESS - DISCOVER CLUB - CONTACT ANNIVERSARY le OWN,& C•VFDAUA ABOUT LA QUINTA General Information Brochures Directions Weather Awards History Send a Postcard Employment La Quinta Resort Leasing California Lifestyle Realty ACCOMMODATIONS History SPA LA QUANTA GOLF Once referred to by the Cahuilla Indians as the "Land of the Eternal Sun," the area we now know as La Quinta Is rich In history dating bads hundreds of years. In the early 16th century, Spanish conquistadors, TENNIS led by Captain Juan Bautista D'Anza, established La Quinta as the fifth base along a route from Mexico to ACTIVITIES & RECREATLON the San Gabriel Mission. La Quinta was the Spanish equivalent to the number five. Quinta, in Mexico, also RESORT DINING means a secluded country retreat, which is exactly what was later developed. MEETINGS & INCENTIVES In 1926, Walter Morgan, the youngest son of a wealthy San Francisco businessman, decided to build a WEDDINGS & CELEBRATIONS small, secluded retreat in the north end of what was then known as Marshall Cove. Morgan, with the help of CLUB MEMBERSHIP C.N. Sinclair of Indio, constructed sbk adobe cottages, an office, and a lobby and dining facility. The hotel SHOPPING opened In February 1927 and represented a total Investment between $150,000 and $200,000. Morgan's goal was to lure Hollywood's rich and famous to a hideaway where they could attend social functions, or VACATION HOME RENTALS simply relax and enjoy the beauty and peacefulness of their own little "casita." The resort, with its original 20 casitas, was the site of the Coachella Valley's first golf course. R r S F R % c T 10 N a Hollywood's brightest stars were regular patrons. Frank Capra came to the hotel to write a movie script and AM,Al o�a:e the result, "It Happened One Night," became such a success, Capra declared the spot his good luck charm 3L1/2007 and returned to the same Casita to write other scripts. Other regulars at the resort included Bette Davis, Clark Gable, Errol Flynn, Katherine Hepburn, Eddie Cantor, Greta Garbo, and Shirley Temple. Depa I L e J14Loo7---- "escaped" ... ------- - — An international clientele of political dignitaries, business leaders and sports heroes often to La Qulnta for recreation and relaxation amid an atmosphere of exclusivity and privacy. Search The only hotel to have an Incorporated dry named after it, the 640-casita La Quinta Resort & Club has preserved the charts and serene ambiance of its glorious past while offering guests the finest In resort amenities and services, Inducing five resort golf courses, one of the nation's top tennis dubs, a full -service spa and fitness center, exclusive dining and resort shopping. 49-499 Eisenhower Drive P.O. Box 69 La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: 760.564.4111 Phone: 800.598.3828 Fax: 760.564.576(8} Email Directory 0 " http://www.laquintaresort.com/aboutthistory.asp 3/8/2007 City Council City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Members: Re: CNL Resorts: La Quinta Resort and Club I have expressed my concern for this project in a previous letter. However, 1 wish to question the veracity of the parking study which was done in relation to this project. I live in the Cove which is five minutes from the Club. However, because of the crowded parking conditons, it is necessary to plan extra time spent in finding available parking. Our tennis game started 15 minutes late this morning because parking was so difficult. Did anyone check out the situaton at 8 a.m., or 9 a.m., or 10 a.m.? This situation will last through the Indian Wells tennis tournament and for all of the Spring break. Please vote this project down. It is one BAD ideal Sincerely, Diane M. Gunn 77-380 W. Montezuma La Quinta, CA 92253 760-564-2327 March 7.2007 O00G916 Page 1 of 1 Dear Mayor Adolph, This Resort is so sure of itself that it continues to just trespass on my property as well as block my access. I have tried everything and you should know two things. First, at no time have they ever contacted me (other than that bushwack letter) and attempted to relieve the problems. Second, as the picture enclosed as late as March 11, 2007, the Resort simply blocked my gate and again for the millionth time parked their trucks on my property. Please put all of my attempts to secure relief into the record or let me know if 1 have to do another set and put in at the council meeting. I do not expect you to read all the emails that have been sent, just read Leslie's which I will put on top out of order because I assure you she hates this sort of thing and is the least confrontational person you will ever meet. All I can tell you, is that I truly have had enough. I have never seen such an arrogant bunch who do not keep their words about anything. I apologize for not being very articulate, but there is no way to reason with these people and in my heart I absolutely know they could care less about this community, the heritage of this once great hotel or any property owner. They simply will attempt to get what they want by whatever means necessary and then sell the place to another out of state conglomerate. Sorry, if 1 sound strident, but just try to think how you would feel if you could not get out your driveway and the person blocking it told your w' go to hell. � 13 M cirr ia� cirv:;nab elan 0000 3 Tuesday, March 13, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 Subj: Truck biking access to home Date: 12/6/2 To: pmccokCa_la uq intaresortcom CC: Lspringddsffirm.com Dear Paul, I have had, yet gain, another, unpleasant confrontation with a truck driver blocking my access to m home. I asked him he realized he was parked in front of a fire access gate, which is illegal, and he info me that yes he was, that it was the company who paid the fines not him. I then asked him how much for was planning on pa ing there and he said 20 minutes. After 20 minutes I walked down to the gate and proceeded to take p clures. The truck driver informed me that his 20 minutes were not up yet and if I toc picture he would pre ss charges. I said please do and offered him my name. Simply put, thee must be a solution to this on going problem. Here is my suggestion. Please have employee on site du ing set up and� take down so they can direct truck drivers to your loading zone. I for am tired of the total ack of respect for the law, my property and myself. I do not enjoy confrontations of kind nor do I enjoy Writing this email. Please make this problem go away. The k you Leslie Fredericks RFreder929 Subj: RE Date: 5/3 To: DM Dear Paul, I have v of illegally parked, ti to the blockage in fr came within inches Mr. Seilers for my e and adjacent to our ensure that steps at of any kind are allov has absolute contra whatever means an occurrence but has point was reached c drop by some pictur Parking and Nuisance cited several days, since I was so upset at what has occurred in front of our home, it icks and hotel cars, I thought it best. On Saturday, I was an emotional mess becau: nt of my house I almost splattered a load of hotel guests on a jitney all over Obregoi ecause my vision was obstructed by an illegally parked car. 1 have since apologize iotional outburst, whom I contacted about the perpetual mess allowed to occur in frc esidence. I simply request that you take whatever steps are necessary to immediate taken to avoid the litany of problems that have occurred in the past and that NO ve ad to obstruct Obregon or trespass and/or illegally park in front of my property. The over this serious problem and I would appreciate it, if the problem would just get sof necessary. Thank you, Richard and Leslie Fredericks PS This is not a one time appened repeatedly, without being solved, so perhaps you can understand that the i Saturday when a catastrophic accident was only avoided by luck and inches. PSS s which speak for themselves. Subj: RE: Date: 7/4/' To: omc Paul, You will recall showed you the eigl time 1 explained that the handle or contac forjunk storage, bar next to two years of had tried to be an ur and departed. Sub: be an ideal place to then I believe I have access and a myriac and moving vans, all occasions I have co on most occasions I almost ran into a jitn my property that I be for my outburst. I di everyone connected family residence, an from constantly con! posts on my propert read the appropriate needs to be on the immediately. I am a Hotel for trespass ar but have tried the of want my property rig possession, and nor Richard Fredericks reasonable/ Hotel Nuisances hat when you first replaced April as Hotel manager we visited in my front yard and I teen wheeler interstate trucks that had been left for storage in front of my property. 1 had always tried to be reasonable, and accommodating regarding the Hotel, not f . :ing lawyers etc. I personally requested that the area in front of my residence not br suet chairs, permanent parking of commercial trucks etc. I also told you that I had I iotel construction and had not been a pain, and had never filed a code complaint; n derstanding and good neighbor. You told me, you understood, gave me your cell n %quently, I contacted you when someone decided the area in front of my residence nstall commercial painting equipment and refurbish the Hotel's fleet of vehicles. Sir been more than patient with blockages, huge commercial trucks sometimes blockin of other improper nuisances, from broken down jitneys, to RV storage, to interstate stored or improperly parked either in front of or adjacent to my property. On a nur tacted Security relating to these issues and 1 think Mr. Leach, and others would agr lave been polite patient, and reasonable in asking for relief. I acknowledge that wh ry loaded with Hotel guests, because I was blinded by an illegally parked vehicle in came emotional, distraught, upset and yes, profane. However, I subsequently apoli state then, and I state again that I had reached the tipping point. I want you and to the Hotel and that includes all of your vendors to understand that my property is I i will no longer tolerate any more constant Code violations, and that I expect to be coding with nuisances whether they are vehicular or otherwise. You have installed 1 since the parking was uncontrollable, and with my reluctant consent. Unfortunately code as set forth in what is cited on the sign and the phone number of the local poll gin in order to tow illegally parked vehicles, and I would appreciate that being done vare that a homeowner on Fernando has found it necessary to file a lawsuit against d other nuisance actions similar to my situation. I have never mentioned the word L er approach. I do not want to experience what previously occurred, or worse, and I its respected with no more excuses. You have the pictures outside my house in yo e of those vehicles could be towed without the previously described correction. Sin Subj: Re Date: M To: Prr Paul, as you know I Obregon Gate. I sir legal rights or partici 624-6407 or Brand I addition, if you woul operated opening m contacting the Reso out please advise m also advise. Likewi: the Santa Rosa Hor very much, Richard gate/Resort interference :re is present litigation concerning easement, trespass, access rights etc. relative dy wish to caution the Resort not to be performing work on the Gate inconsistent v Sting in the manual locking of the Gate. You may contact either Jedd Springer at: roper at 213430-9255 who represent mein this matter, for further elaboration. In like copies of the conditions for construction of this Gate calling for an electrically ;hanism, 1 will happily provide them to you. In the meantime, if there are City offic regarding this Gate and somehow advising the Resort to participate in locking me as well as my attorneys. If the Resort has not interfered in any way, please if you (the Resort or ifs predecessors in interest) have entered into any agreeme rowners that effect or impact my rights regarding Obregon please advise. Thank) 00t1U9 17, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 Subj: Re Date: 9/3 To: prr Paul, Please unders 1930 recorded map interfering with that i access. I again reqt access. So please i devices, welding etc is an aggravated ani access that is your r Gate and that I have an easement on Obregon, just as the Hotel does dating back to the f survey filed on behalf of Walter Morgan. Consequently, the Resort has no busing, 3sement whether by repairing Gate or doing anything that aids or abets denying me ast that the Resort not assist anyone in maintaining this illegal obstruction to my rigt wise all appropriate employees of the resort and not to engage in installing locking This obstruction is not on Hotel property, and therefore to continue to assist the SR malicious interference with my property rights. If you choose not to allow your gue: Iht, but you have no business interfering with my rights. Thanks, Richard Saturday, Febniary 17, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 Subj: Code Date: 1/26/: From: RFre( To: Code, CC: thar _u I have waited a wee might write a lot of t that I could not pose feet of hitting me he illegally on Fernand is that you have bee ad nauseum and I F documenting a reck done despite the cc the LQMC. There e Resort can continue enforcement of this going to patrol and until someone is kill reached long ago, t iplaint/re unequal enforcement of code 4:57:27 P.M.'Pacific Standard Time to write this as I was so upset because of a near head on collision on Femando, I f ngs I would regret. The bottom line is because of an illegally parked Coke truck an, )ly see due to the illegal obstruction swerved around the truck and came within a cc d on as I proceeded east on Fernando. In addition, last week a line of limos were p Also this past week ten card'df touring cars were parked illegally on Obregon. The i made aware of the constant problem and obstructions on Obregon as well as Fern rsonally have provided three detailed parking and circulation books pictorially se; and wanton disregard for the public safety. The problems continue, and nothing stant danger and violations of the California Fire Code, California Vehicle Code as i an ever increasing number of citizens of this City who cannot comprehend why th o flagrantly disregard the law with impunity. Why do we have a separate an unequ tate's and this:City's Code with respect to health and safety? Is the City of La Quint iforce these fire lanes as mandated in the Code or will it continue to be business as d? Richard Fredericks and other concerned citizens and residents. PS Critical ma t the unequal application of the LQMC deserves an answer. 0006*9 Subj: Code Date: 11274 From: RFrec To: Code, CC: thartu I have reached the trucks using the frc unwilling to police i violation of the Coc storage. I even alli Secondarily, Obret allowed as truck st immediately. The i dangerous conditic compel the Resort activity stop and st previously been pr improper interferer P.M. Pacific Standard Time id of the line with Classic Party Rentals, and dozen other commercial trucks and coi of my property as a permanent loading zone. Obviously, the Resort is incapable or alf and continually violates the zoning code. This, Tom, is not a civil matter as it is a to block access, use the area adjacent to a single family residence for commercial t red ugly signs but front of my private property prohibiting parking and this is ignored. n is a fire lane and I am unaware of any exception in California law wherein fire lane age or loading zones. I am utterly fatigued with this problem and want it stopped ly of La Quinta and ifs various officials has allowed this public, private nuisance and far too long. I would like some immediate relief. You have the machinery in place t( stop breaking the law, and it is not unreasonable for any citizen to demand that illec immediately. I have pictures, but that does not seem to have much impact as you I ided pictures of this illegal activity. I am now formally requesting relief from this con; with my rights. Richard Fredericks Subj: Re: Date: 1 /21 From: RR To: that The Resort controls This problem has bi letting them know tl my residence. The People on Fernand, front of my house, 11 Thank you, Richard Complaint 1:01:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time ianquets and the Resort could surely cleanup ifs act with appropriate encouragerrK an occurring for a long long time and perhaps a more aggressive approach or at lea it it is not alright to block Obregon by either loading or storing commercial trucks in t act that I would take the time to notify the City should indicate that enough is enougl have their own problems with commercial trucks, but not only do I own half the stre also serves as a fire lane so it would seem not unreasonable to request some relief. 000701 RFreder929 Subj: Re: Date: 1/3( From: RFr To: thar Thank you very m posted no parking Therefore, I really alleviate the probli Complaint 2:08:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time i and as I write this thank you a huge truck is obstructing Obregon, parked next to lane. It is inexcusable as it could be doing the same thing in the adjacent parkin believe that just some encouragement from the zoning department would certaini as notwithstanding the violation, committed management could correct this probl Subj: Re 4 Date: 1/31 From: Uri To: pmc CC: i pri Paul, I have sent Gate including pr prohibited. You I is prohibited by C on appeal. Your rn Gate 1:09:32 P.M. Pacific Standard Time :iple emails requesting that the Resort not interfere with my access through the OI ing Knox Locks. I have sent you the Courts ruling in which denying me access is not responded. I again caution you not to interfere and I again remind you that di order and would remind your legal department that what I have described is not oliance with the Courts order would be appreciated. Richard 000703 Online: RFreder929 Subj: Re Date: 212 From: RF To: Prr CC: iso Paul, As you may k rights provisions of elevated parking to kitchen window, an beer cans etc. onto youthful guests occ encroachment watt like to see this con( my intention to turn appreciate a respoi that not unlike the f Council meetings. consideration, or w commission or City documentation regi beside the point as addressed and I w( as soon as possibli AOL now offers wall improper construction continuing encroachment 2:19 P.M. Pacific Standard Time ow the non conforming parking facility adjacent to my property is in violation of the pecific plan 28545. The Resort simply pushed tons of dirt against my wall, erected :uming my six foot wall into a four foot wall. This enables guests to literally look in r makes for an easy and continuing trash receptacle. Resort guests simply toss gad ny property. This is particularly egregious in the summertime when five six and sev py single Casita rooms. Further, as you know I recently repainted the wall. Due to is seeping into the wall causing damage and the paint to already begin peeling. I v Jon remedied in a neighborly fashion. I invite you to inspect and see for yourself. I his into a federal case as I would hope there is a mutually beneficial remedy. I wou oe and as I have indicated, it is my desire to work this issue out between ourselves. ate on Obregon this problem can be addressed prior to the next series of planning he nuisance that I had to contend with last summer will be just another issue for can work out a solution where neither one of us is surprised in front of the planning :ouncil. I have checked the provisions of the plan and it also appears that the ding grading etc. seems to be missing from the Public Works files. That, of course, ' you will just look, your common sense will tell you that what is continuing needs to (Id prefer to simply handle it in a friendly non confrontational manner. Please let mt Richard email to everyone. Find out more about whats free from AOL at AOL.com.. Subj: Re Non Date: 3/1/200' From: RFredei To: Pmccor CC:isoringe Paul, I have had no actions have and cr between ourselves. work in which tons elevating an illegal then just advise. PI addressing the neg significantly exacerl within the vicinity o1 directly effecting mr the noise, the party Please let me know time. The misleadii I am simply attempt with you and attemi desirable approach rights, wilfully overt encumbered by an subdivision of whicl Obregon, and was property to Mabel C 1928 recorded in 11 others which I provi AOL now offers :ompliant Elevated Parking Facility Coninuing Nuisance 9:11:45 P.M. Pacific Standard Time -esponse from'you regarding the nuisance issues and encroachment problems the I itinue to have on my property. I again extend the opportunity to work this issue out If you choose to ignore the issues of the taking of privacy rights, the improper bulld( f dirt were simply pushed against our wall reducing its height by several feet, while arking facility and causing the beer can, trash problem that I have previously descri lase do not go to the next planning and Council meetings with some last minute prof tive Environmental impact that this problem has created ,and your water proposal w ate and increase. Now is the time to correct. Like it or not, I am a single family resic lour conditional use permit request, and past, present and future environmental issr have not been addressed. I am directly impacted by the Resort's summer crowd, it rg, guests sitting and drinking on the wall, as well as tossing trash onto my property. because if the Resort even contemplates any mitigation measures, now would be ti approach used relative to access is not going to work again, so just let me know b ig to quietly resolve with you a current problem that is only going to get worse. I wil i to be a reasonable neighbor on this issue. Ignore me and you simply chose the le; As for the road, make no mistake, the resort has acted with utter disdain for my pro rrdening my easement, and as I informed the Council does not own the road, as it is asement appurtenant to my property dating back to 1928 when Walter Morgan ores this property was a part. Walter Morgan, as you know built his home in 1927 also a friend and neighbor of Mabel Carruthers. His company Desert Development cone) rrruthers the following year 1928. Prior to that conveyance he filed a Record of Sun 28, depicting the lots among which were those which abutted Obregon including m ad the City the other evening. email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 000705 1 6,nAou Marrt, nA 7M7 Amrrirn Online- RFreder929 Subj: Re Date: 3/5 From: RF To: Prr I spoke with Tom H is not very complica or would it be safeb very little, well actui some ridiculous 14 your assistance will P.M. Pacific Daylight Time mg and he said that you idea which I concur with needs an engineer to look at ai and indicated that what they (City ) would a concerned with is can it structurally ;ue Le falling down. So send me an engineer and perhaps this can be resolved. nothing, but I did get the impression that City would be cooperative so long as it mue, but do need to know that it can be done safety. Obviously, time is of esser appreciated. AOL now offers freelemail to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 000i05 1 k4nnrinu Mnrrh 11 10117 Amnriro (lnlinc• RFrnAnrQ70 Subj: Re: Re lVall Impact Date: 316/200 9:15:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time From: Wrede 29 To: PMcCo ick la uintaresort.com Is he an engineer b cause Hartung said they will know very quickly about issue and used words like a might be wrong ult sound, or girders. This is area where I am very weak and words were not sometl familiar with, but un ss I torally misunderstood, he said it would not be difficult for engineer and again am again misunde tanding he seemed to be cooperative barring the safety issue as I really could not the language. All 1 now is he said that it would not be a big issue at all for an engineer. I hope you kr speak frankly about things I know, but this is out of my expertise more than completely. AOL now offers fre4 email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. OOO M Subj: Fwd: R Fire lane blockage Date: 3/8/200 1:11:01 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time From: RFrede 29 To: thartul la-quinta.org CC: Mittelbu her Tom, this now out o date as was yesterday, but for some reason came back to me. Probably my fault. AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com Forwarded Messag : Subj: Re Fire ane blockage Date: 3/7/200 6:21:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time From: RFrede 29 To: thartun la-quinta.org There presently is a commercial truck in fire lane parked right in front of fire sign. Your man was here ea and I guess he thou jht it was okay for large truck to have back into intersection. It is not. However, this in front of my house has been parked their for the last several hours. Naturally, I have taken pictures, bt remind anyone who will listen that it is not alright to interfere with my easement of ingress egress, interfe a fire lane, and it re lly needs to stop. At one time we had the two truck scenario, and you know what th means total blockag 9. This is unnecessary and good management could fix it, otherwise I have no alten to contact you, becE use I am single family residence, and this is not okay. It has been going on for far tc and I am sure a simple call from you to management could fix it as it is not like they have to do this. AOL now offers freq email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com 000708 Monday. March 12.2007 America Online: Subj: re wall Date: 3/8/20 7 4:40:04 P.M. Pacific Standard Time From: RFredE r929 To: Pmcco mick Iaquintaresort.com CC: is rin r ddsfFirm.com Paul, what is happ ning. Last evening I very nicely had some friendly beer drinkers not sit on the we: portion of my wall. They were nice about it as I am not going to misrepresent their attitude. However still remain a probl m, that should you water feature withstand challenge, needs to be addressed parl view of my experie ice with summertime demographics. The Resort needs to address this issue and sooner the later as I am willing to be cooperative, in an attempt to mitigate a very bad situation. AOL now offers fret email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 000 70" Subj: Re: re all Date: 3/8/20 7 5:36:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time from: RFred r929 To: PMCC_ micklaquintaresort.com CC: isprinoddsffirm.com While foliage is nk mitigate noise and sympathetic and a expect you to conl parking facility. I e recall, I was not ur property. I can be resolve this, but to aggravating if it we but someone neec is not in the least t some bushes is n AOL now offers . That is not going to replace two feet of wall that was improperly taken, nor is it go ie trash problem. Perhaps, I misunderstood Hartung but he seemed to be much m •eeable than Rick thought was going to be the case. There are many Cities that we m to the zoning code and the specific plan property provisions and simply redo yoL i simply trying to be reasonable, but simply planting foliage is not going to excite mi .asonable when I noticed that the resort was trespassing by nailing all the things to is same type of reasonable person, or I can elevate. My personal preference is to ng two feet of privacy wall and simply pushing tons of dirt against my wall would be your property Paul. I am not trying to personalty make yourjob harder than it alre to understand that I am not going to just go away when property rights are tramples inconsistent with trying to get along and being reasonable, just be forewarned that going to resolve this issue. email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 000'70 re171 fRA:iW.71=81.01 Subj: re con nuing nuisance Date: 3/9120 9:33:43 P.M. Pacific Standard Time From: Fred _29 To: P_mcco mirk la uintaresort.com CC: Lsprin r ddsffirm.com I have realty had it rom trespass to trash. I am tired of picking up beer cans and short case boxes this tired of the noise a d people invading my privacy, thinking I own a zoo etc. This is all because of the encroachment the you are not addressing. I have tried the reasonable approach and it is not working. suppose your corp rate owners must think this kind of intolerable conditions are simply a cost of doing business. If the h eowner does not like it let him sue and we will chalk it up and budget for it. I am ni only homeowner t you have apparently used this approach with, because I know that you are preser being sued for tre ass and some of the same issues i have been complaining about for the last two ye you personally. Y u surely remember sitting in my front yard and the interstate truck diesel issue and y surely are aware o all the intentional trespasses on my property by resort guests, parking on my prope blocking my acres etc. I have given you pictures. What do 1 need to do for you to remedy what you (I has caused by sor ehow, ignoring property rights provisions, and somehow building an illegal encroach There were million of Pinto's built and but for a three cent part people would not have been injured. I c any way mean to mpare inconsiderate people tossing beer bottles, or sitting on my wall or looking in bedroom to the inji ries suffered by Pinto owners. What I am simply illustrating is someday the policy a trampling on peopl 's right to the quiet enjoyment of their home, and chalking up the legal exposure to 1 of doing business ight end in an unbudgeted result. I do not want to sue for the trespass, but I am sc close to the tippin point that it would just seem like a good business decision to remedy rather than ris! unfavorable result. Obviously, the choice is yours. Just remember I have been pushed about as far as push a person and if get up tomorrow and have to clean up broken glass again it will not bode well. Re choice is yours. R hard Fredericks AOL now offers fret email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 000 r03 March 12, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 Subj: Re Date: 3/1 From: RF To: Prr CC: isa Paul, If your corps our access, guest received the respi (KFC), and yes I c huge truck on my whatsoever, to tru reasonable, How trucks, their idling There has never I my property in an overreaching corn has now came. I blight. I am sorry Fredericks PS Rc parked vehicle on called. The Reso AOL now offers Nuisance parking obstructions and continuing trespass !:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time )n gave a whit about any kind of reconciliation or mitigating the problems with bla sing trash into our yard, sitting on the wall, or the continuing trespass I would not I received, which in real talk means tough, live with it. Yesterday, it was chicken Jed to get a witness. Today, you completely blocked our access and simply parks )erty. This has gone on too long and it is obvious that there is no commitment tempt to solve, and stop these problems. You can never say I did not try to be I has it been since you sat in my front yard and I made you aware of the huge die; ;e, their fumes and the fact that they were simply stored in front of or on on my prc a let up and I have begged, pleaded, written emails: even allowed those ugly sigi mpt to obtain relief. There has been none. There does come a time when opprei reaches a point where any reasonable person can only say enough is enough. T se remove the signs from my property, as they make no difference and are a visw the Resort will not mitigate or police itself. But, I truly have had enough. Richard nber when Lalmost killed someone (a jitney with hotel guests because of an illeg; property and obstructed vision, and I asked security to have you phone me). You s simply written off the quiet use and enjoyment of our residence as an irrelevano email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 000704 I Mondav, March 12, 2007 America Online: RFreder929 '� �Y f +I I. J • r • r l I Ie I I I III � f I f 4 [ 4� I ` C I } 2 i I I I I I I III I. I I I I 1�I rCF I i I r Ei2 I I, s§ 4 f t ` t t V�� s roF I 1 �I f 1 I I ltin � I � '� ■Mii �■ei.I y � I _' a• BOB; �uRl l I I �RMRI MOR1 ■eIi � N I ' ' � ■I■ I I I a W � � I iMR III I ■ME" ��NME ,I NMI i laur I I I d iMB, s' I ik ft, iruzi = � I to 1 AM y 1 �{ I I11 e 1r FFF � tt� I 1. r f 4 1 Page 1 of 1 f Wanda Wise -Latta From: Nancy White [nindoll@comcast.net] C M Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:51 AM To: Wanda Wise -Latta (�nJ Subject: water park Honorable Mayor and Council Members, I appreciate how busy all of you are with many matters considering many aspects of city management so I won't take much time. This is indeed my third email to you all and for that I apologize but this matter is so meaningful to me and I was so very disappointed in what I heard and saw last night at the Planning Commission meeting that I just have to express myself and my frustration. I have attended thus far 2 planning commission meetings and one city council meeting and so far I am struck by what appears to be the giant gobbling up the ant. I watched last night as the commissioners completely and wholly caved into The Hilton Corp as though drugged. They expressed absolutely no regard for the adjoining and adjacent property owners and/ or the monthly dues paying tennis club members or any others who might just love the hotel as it is today. Their concern seemed only to focus on the bottom line ... i.e. The Hilton Corporation's desire for this outlandish and totally inappropriate water park. There was indiscernible COMPROMISE ... a few very small details, which if implemented will not cause the Hilton Corp any inconvenience and won't do anything to mollify the property owners, club members etc. For a month I have allowed myself to believe that compromise meant give and take ... well the aforementioned groups have nothing to give ... we have been totally raped and have nothing left to offer. The Hilton Corp hasn't attempted to scale back either in size or scope their proposal, they haven`t offered to leave our beloved center court or give us back any courts at all. Virtually, they have thrown bits of nothing at us and completely hoodwinked the planning commissioners. As I tossed and turned last night I could only hope that the five of you would turn this proposal down outright or, at the very least, insist upon some real compromise. You have constituents, unlike the planning commissioners, and given the tenor of the Feb loth meeting I attended, you seem to understand the basic issues far better. I nervously await March loth. Thank you for patiently listening one more time .... you hold our fate in your capable hands. Sincerely, Nancy White 000110 GEORGE MIERS CC. k & .ASSOCIATES e� February 15, 2007 1l� Mayor Adolph and All City Council Members La Quinta, California Reference: City Council Meeting 2/20/2007 & La Quinta Resort Proposed Signature Pool Project Dear City of La Quinta Mayor and Council Members: My wife and I own a residence at 77307 Avenida Fernando on the La Quinta Resort grounds and want to express our serious concerns about the referenced project. Quite a few years ago in the mid-1980's, the City of La Quinta. hired me and my firm to program and master plan your new Civic Center Project. That commission lead to my first visit to the City and, quite frankly, I fell in love with it. Since then our family has been regular visitors to the City and to the wonderful La Quinta Hotel and recently we were fortunate enough to purchase a home on the La Quinta Resort Grounds right adjacent to the proposed pool expansion. While a recent letter to you by another resident, Richard G. Miller, ably points out the environmental and planning problems presented by this project, what we would like to stress is that what attracted us and obviously many other La Quinta families, is the areas uniqueness and scale which is so different than the other Desert Communities. While I realize that it is unnecessary to further describe these characteristics which you are each well aware, I do want to urge you to consider the fact that "scale" and "unique character and ambiance" as well evidenced by the Santa Rosa Cove and the grounds of the La Quirita Hotel arc fragile cormnodities that can easily be destroyed. They are also characteristics which are difficult to define, plan for and legislate — hence, the dilemma that befalls you with determining the fate of this proposal. These are, however, characteristics which those who are attracted to La Quinta and the Santa Rosa Cove (and quite frankly the Hotel itself) understand and feel every day — and they need to be safeguarded. That is the responsibility which City Government bears and towards this end, we urge you to protect this unique character and deny this proposal. George Miers & Jennifer Kuenster 77307 Avenida Fernando La Quinta, CA 92253 000711 i150 `vlc�aga bVoy, Suitr lS6 Moray, CA 94336 (925)6i1-6900 Fax i925i 631-69i0 Wanda Wise -Latta AnI From: John Jonides Djonides@umich.edu] Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:19 PM To: Wanda Wise -Latta Subject: Signature Pool Mayor Adolph, I am writing in advance of the Planning Commission and City Council meetings this month about a revised plan for the signature pool proposed for the La Quints Resort. As the last City Council meeting made clear, there is substantial and well -motivated objection by residents for such a radical building project by the hotel, a project that changes the very character of what is a landmark resort property. This property has its historical elegance threatened by a project that will cheapen what is a destination resort, when the hotel wou:Ld be much better advised to invest its funds in upgrading a facility that is showing substantial wear around the edges. To be sure, if some of this upgrading involves bettering the pool area that already exists, that hotel should make that investment. But to do so with a design that will cut out the landmark center court, that will add substantial traffic via the additional social memberships that are being handed out to new developments in the vicinity (none of which, of course, will have been recognized by the traffic study conducted in February because they have not yet come online), that will have questionable impact on summer business, and that will shock the environment for residents in that vicinity of the tennis and pool areas is a move that promises to substantially degrade a significant landmark in La Quinta. I and other residents of La Quinta hope that the City Council continues to object to the creation of a water park of such substantial proportions and instead urges the owners of the hotel to invest in sharpening the draw of the existing facilities of this historical property. Thank you for your attention to this important issue. John Jonides 508:20 Mango La Quinta, CA 92253 Member, The Citrus John Jonides CAA Ck CD ee(ul�, Daniel J. Weintraub Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience co -Director, fMRI Laboratory Editor, Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience Department of Psychology University of Michigan 530 Church Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1430 Phone: 734-764-0192 Fax: 734-994-7157 Email: jjonides@umich.edu ON R 2 � .. The Most Honorable Mayor Donald Adolph Ckk ,, / March 2, 2007 City Council Members / nl%i,i, `c,.'_ ',T 78-495 Calle Tampico CD La - La Quinta, CA 92253 ed" RE: Appreciation Proposed Signature Pool at La Quinta Resort and Club Dear Mayor Adolph, Thank you and your Administration for outstanding leadership that provided positive direction and admirable progress to our city. It was interesting to learn that the City of La Quinta was founded in 1982, 56 years after La Quinta Resort was built, and is the only city in America named after a resort. We hope you can find the time to read this letter as we are deeply concerned residents of Santa Rosa Cove. We live on the 18' Fairway of the Mountain Course. We attended the first public meeting regarding the above mentioned water park and witnessed many misrepresentations of facts presented by CNL representatives and the CNL Attorney in his closing remarks. Morgan Stanley recently purchased La Quinta Resort & Club from CNL. For instance, CNL said they had had meetings to advise owners of their plans for the Signature Pool yet very few received the notice of the meetings until after the fact or had an opportunity to see the plans. The meetings were held in the summer when few were here or even knew about them Another example — the CNL Attorney showed a picture of "Obregon parking" at 5:00 PM, said it was not crowded and stated "everyone knows that is the busiest time!" At 5:00 PM most people are getting ready to eat out. The truth is Obregon parking is difficult for autos or golf carts to park from 7:30 AM through 3:30 PM when most guests and members use the fitness center, spa, pool and tennis courts. We were told that the only way to take our grandchildren is to purchase a room for that day so they could use the facility! However, members would be allowed to use it along with their children up to age 23 and living at home full time. How many children live in Santa Rosa Cove, Los Estados, The Enclave or Mountain Estates? Also, we were told that the decision is final and that there will beno exceptions. Can you imagine what it would be like to tell your grandchildren they are not allowed to use the water park when they hear the activity all over our area and even across the street at the La Quinta Country Club and surrounding gated communities? As you know, La Quinta means "Country Retreat' and the La Quinta Resort advertises the Resort as ... a famous popular destination (escape) world-wide since 1927. The Resort is known for its lush grounds that offer breathtaking beauty and serenity, excellent golf and tennis facilities, and famous guests (some mentioned) along with additional historic information. It is also stated on the Guest Activity Marquee that posts group meetings and locations set on the back comer side of the KSL offices across from the Flores Ballroom and Parking Lot. (See enclosed copy of"Our History".) We can appreciate the fact that they want to create activity here in the summer. However, wj b V 13 Hilton purchased the management for twenty years, La Quinta Resort and Club was, and still is, a resort. Resorts such as winter ski areas, beaches, Carribean, etc., expect down periods. Would it be possible for the Council Members to actually walk and see the area and ponder some practical constructive issues ... • How long would permits, etc., effect the length of construction? How would construction be planned, executed and monitored? • Who pays for the road repairs and the owners property damage caused by maneuvering of heavy equipment in narrow areas? • Who cleans up debris blown around? Will it raise Members dues for additional safety? • How will construction traffic on narrow Fernando road effect people using Fernando Gate? • How will the continual noise (beeping, etc.) and emissions of large equipment effect guests, members, surrounding gated communities? • What are the guarantees that Hilton Management would honor the operation times stated? • How can members and service workers access the spa, fitness center, Mountain and Dunes Golf Club, golf courses, etc., if they close the Obregon service cart access on the south end as they have stated? • Which building/s and/or current parking areas will be eliminated for a shuttle turn around? • Where will guests/participants and club members park and assemble for a shuttle pick up? • How often would the shuttle pick up rotate? • What will be the effect on the long treasured views of the mountains being obliterated (walk around the resort; it will amaze you to see how views will be effected while destroying the tranquil ambiance that sets it apart from other resorts in the world). • Is the water park planned to be used by the new Hilton on Washington? Legacy Villas? Happy Point homes (which are offering the opportunity to purchase Heritage memberships), while Heritage Members living in SRC are not allowed to take their grandchildren? • Will they ignore contracts with Heritage members that other operatives have honored? • If it does not succeed will it be opened to the public? Will it become commercial? • How will it effect the other residents of the City of La Quinta? Effect property values? • Should a water park physically dominate and destroy an historic Country Retreat, La Quints Resort; our city's namesake? There is so much more. Thank you for taking your valuable time to review concerns of many of us that are effected. We hope you will encourage Council Members to look at the complete picture so they can vote with a clearer understanding of what was glossed over in the presentations, the effect it will have on many citizens, and the radical change it will bring to our City. Most Sincerely, X"UC,.G-�P David E. andL Barbara S. addell 49-489 Avenida Vista Bonita La Quinta, CA 92253 TEL 760-777-1176; FAX 760-771-6768 Copy of La Quinta Resort's "Our History" included " ! nazac� La Quinta Resort & Club sits on what once was lake Cahudla. which covered the Coachella Valley hundreds of years ago. The water fine from the lake can still be seen along the foothills of the Mountain Golf Course. For the ancient desert Cahudla Indians, who originally inhabited the area, they felt the cove was hallowed ground They called it "land of the EtemalSun". r Founder, Walter K Morgan of San Francisco, dreamed of building a sanctuary of seclusion and serenity in a desert oasis. Morgan's dream carts to life during the Christmas holiday of 1926 and he named her "La Quinta", Spanish for "Country Retreat". The original 20 Spanish style casitas were each named after Saints. The resort was the first in the Coachella Valley with a 9-hole golf course. Green fees at that time were only one dollar! The total construction cost was approximately $200,000. The resort became famous as the escape for many of Hollywood's luminaries including Dorothy Armer, Greta Garbo, Clark Gable, and Frank Capra, President Dwight Eisenhower and countless political and business leaders were also frequent guests. In 1982 the City of La Quinta was incorporated thus becoming the only city in America named after a resort. Today La Quinta features over 700 rooms including luxuriously appointed Resort homes, fire -lit casitas and romantic Starlight morns. Spread over 43 acres, the lush grounds offer breathtaking beauty and serenity. In addition the world class Spa La Quinta and nearby PGA WEST' add pampering plus nitre golf courses to the long list of reasons why so many people have come to call La Quinta their home. A sstosrran 00071a 0e6ymd6y 9fan� February 22, 2007 Honorable Donald Adolph Mayor City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92247-1504 s FEB 222001 . D CI!Y OF LA QUINTAA CITY MANAGER S DEPT Re. Proposed Signature PoollWater Park Dear Mayor Adolph: ovum L. ftget 776omvewYa 4'emando ✓ La Quints, CaGfornia 92247 (760)564-2747 Lt:�t(J r ) At last Tuesday evening's City Council meeting I was prepared to stick it out until the bitter end, even when things didn't look so good. But I was unprepared to be rewarded for my patience; not because of the decision rendered by the council for which we are exceedingly grateful, but because of your pointed questions and observations to Paul McCormick which struck at the very heart of the whole controversial matter. I'm not sure everyone picked up on it, but it really hit home to my wife and I who have lived here for more than 20 years. Whatever weariness I may have felt around 1:30 a.m. early Wednesday morning was replaced with a burst of energetic optimism after your conversation with Mr. McCormick. Your remarks were a perfect anecdotal rebuke to Mr. McCormick and, in particular, his employer, about their philosophy of ownership of the hotel and its unique assets. I told my wife that I was heartened when you made your point about the golfers on one of the PGA West courses who were obviously not members and then I nearly came out of my chair and cheered when you wouldn't let McCormick off the hook when he tried to explain away the incident as a likely membership promotional courtesy. It was a perfect illustration that the hotel owners feel that they can do whatever they like, regardless of the rules and consideration for its members, much less the surrounding property owners. I can only imagine what they would have done with the development and operation of their Signature Pool left to their own devices. I have been in the commercial real estate business for 33 years, mainly in Los Angeles. As a result of my business I am familiar with CNL. I don't know if you are aware of this, bu t the acron CNL stands for Commercial Net Lease. In the lexicon of the real estate ym, , investment business, the common term "net lease", has implied significance. It means 000716 Mayor Donald Adolph February 22, 2007 Page 2 that an investor is particularly interested in the true, take-home income generated by an investment, undiluted by a responsibility for recurring or variable expenses required by any given property. This investment approach reveals much about CNL and explains volumes about why they have not been proactive in making improvements until absolutely necessary. I can just imagine what it must be like for McCormick when he submits his budgets for capital improvement expenses. The condition of the berm along Eisenhower at Tampico is another perfect example. It has, evidently, been a topic of discussion for a long time without any action. It would have been so easy for the Resort to voluntarily enhance that condition a long time ago if only as a gesture to the community. The fact that it is now willing, even eager to make the improvements, so unrelated to its proposed Signature Pool, is so transparent that it is almost revolting. The sad fact is that CNL, and its predecessor KSL, are not worthy stewards of these assets and they have not earned the right to presume endorsement on new projects requiring discretionary approval. But until early last Wednesday morning, after 20 years of living at this address, I have never heard anyone say as much so effectively as you as Councilman Sniff did. I was so exhilarated and grateful I felt compelled to write this note to thank you very much for your efforts. ' cer� William L. Puget WLP/bp P.S. If you actually made it to your 7:30 tee time Wednesday morning, I hope you were able to persuade your companions to give you a couple of extra strokes under the circumstances. 000717 LIM ; ENTERPpISE(B - - -� C,ir Dp«vd:n f„ . _ _ _ _ CIIY L!k,1gCER'S DEP7 INCORPORATED February 21, 2007 + Mayor Adolph l3)l CAf3 And Council Members NA City of La Quinta O A, 78-495 Calle Tampico /1) ✓ La Quinta, CA 92253 C) J I owe you an apology for my blundering comments on Tuesday Evening. I have been in business for over 60 years, active in professional, civic and service organizations, such as being Governor of Rotary International. In my lifetime I have given over izat instructional inspirational and motivational speeches. Tuesday evening was not one of 2000 those times as I was called to the podium my left hearing aid went dead and just before I reached the podium my right hearing aid went dead. To say the least I was frustrated a little disoriented and thus a blundering idiot. I know you said something to me Mr. Mayor at the end of my "presentation' but I was not looking at you so I could not read your lips, that would have helped me at that time. Again I apologize. Having said the above, your undertaking of permit 2006-865 is a monumental challenge. I have served on planning and economic development commissions and am aware of the intricacies involved in your decision and needless to say I am very pro business. I have had the opportunity to study the documents available to me, evaluating the environmental, ecological, parking, architectural, landscaping and decibel information. I fully understanding the property owners, home owners and tennis players positions and although I have empathy for their position I feel it is the responsibility of La Quinta Resort to develop their property to its highest and best use. In fact it is the obligation of the Resort to maintain their occupancy level and improve that position especially with the new resorts under construction and the current destination resorts within their sphere of influence. I have noted that La Quinta Resort has made several changes in their plans to make themselves a good neighbor and it is my understanding that there are working further to satisfy all concerned but unfortunately you cannot please all the people all the time. This family water facility will make the Resort more attractive and will enhance their occupancy rate and thus allow the Resort to maintaining a stable work force. offer first class personal service while 000718 u 0 83PA008219 602489 1025 S. Palm Canyon Road •Palm Springs , California 92262 • TEL 760.320.5303 FAX 760.320.4743 I hope that you find a positive position to this request and approve the Resolution during your meeting in March, it will be good for La Quinta. e the way devotion and tours a azou ave e very this very controversial issue, your intensity, Legal De g obvious. No matter what the decision the City Planners, g Departments and all concerned Dave done a complete and thorough investigation. P. S. I do not spend my time in " Coachella" but rather four to five days in La Quints 'haling time with a beautiful, intelligent woman and enjoying all the services ofthe City. 000719 LI1C.0IA002583 PA008219 602189 1025 S. Palm Canyon Road • Palm Springs , California 92262 • T a 760.320.5303 FAx 760.320.4743 FEB 2 26 February 2007 Dear Mayor Adolph,, I thank you for your support on the question of the water park proposed by the La Quinta hotel. We appreciated your straight thinking and your strong leadership of the council. Late in the evening the question was asked how many people will be eligible to use the Water Park facilities proposed by the hotel. Management prevaricated and never did give a definitive number that I could hear. At a meeting last summer they stated that there were then 2500 members. Since then there have been reports of memberships given to purchasers at Legacy Villas and Pointe Happy. So you would have to conclude that there are more than stated. This compounds traffic and parking problems that have not been adequately addressed. This is the kind of negative responses we get when we bring up problems of noise, traffic and parking. Essentially evasion or denial. Another subject that was mentioned but not discussed is the assumption that this proposed facility will bring more money into the city. And indeed it may if it was successful. But consider this. The Santa Rosa Cove HOA generates 1.4 million dollars in property tax revenue. That results in $98,000 being returned to the City of La Quinta each year. And we have been doing this for over 25 years. I think our quiet neighborhood deserves to be protected from the chaos of a water park. The hotel management has promoted an atmosphere of being a struggling little community asset that needs help to survive in a world of Wal-Mart type competition. I'm sure you know that this is not a Mom and Pop operation. It is a part of a multi billion dollar corporate business that frequently runs rough shod over private interests. Our home owners need the help of the city to protect our homes from that type of treatment and we feel our long term tax support makes us deserving of that help. Sincerely, Philip Ischks 000720 -- Page 1 of 1 ce=111*,f Dear Mayor Adolph, 1 am providing one set of very recent pictures that speak for themselves. It is not okay to continue seventy foot conttraffic ins vat t ilb ock ��,� emergensafety amass on either Fernandthe citizens of this o rl0bregon The t is not okay r tn�tt / Resort wants to impose a water feature on an area that cannot support a wading pool. 1 would respectfully (I n f you circulate these recent photos (as recent as yesterday) and please ensure that they too are request thatthe record Please also take note of the fad that Fernando does not meet the Code requirement ol4w made part of a private primary entrance stre the wellaknown�Please also hare with o'urel need Coundipersons are already dimensions on Obregon as they relative to the misrepresentations made by the applicant regarding my the information I have provided y fact that at the access issues. Finally, I would request that the Council taketated that 50 additional keys were expected from attended, where you spoke last summer, that the applicant and their children are going to get there in Legacy Villas who would enjoy the water feature. How these people Is certtamm f these children seventy do sotrucks has not on the road as there addressed nosidewalks leither Fernando or findings r for the all of rny elected of a conditional usenpermiit. Thank ythat ou, Richard FFrredericksand Ith a� safety are required VJ It Uli � U 2 "8 UJ 000"r21 nnlinv- RFreACT929 Steve Davis nC�,�^ p, , al �" """ 1 CAA, 77-500 Avenida Fernando C La Quinta, CA 92253 RECEIVED To: La Quinta City Council I'll DEB 28 11 2 CITY�QIF LA QpurThe attached should be self explanatory. As sh( l rD ftelit to you. Please do not do anything or approve anything which uec erwise worsen an already absurd situation on Fernando. I do not believe you have the right to do SO. The noise, exhaust and traffic on Fernando is overwhelming as it is. I can't imagine anybody approves of the trucks or overuse on that road. I have been forced to bring an action against certain entities related to or among the La Quinta Resort. You have been noticed a copy of the Complaint. Please do not do anything which will force me to assert whatever rights I may have via the City. I have tried to be a decent member of this community. Fernando is a part of my property. I am unwilling to allow the Resort to take it through overuse and I will fight any efforts of the Resort to enlist the City. I am particularly bothered by the fact that the traffic consultants never contacted me or the Pugets. I am similarly bothered by the City's willingness to accept a 1977 EIR. I am available at 510-393-2414. Nobody from the Resort or the City has ever contacted me or the Pugets. Sincerely, Steve Davis 2/27/07 000722 The attached summarizes the events of Monday, February 26, 2007. At 7 am a medium size Penske yellow truck and a 2. New Century 53 foot container truck with a red cab lined up on Fernando. It took ten minutes for the trucks to access the Resort driveway. During that time the trucks were idling exhaust and noise directly down my driveway into my front yard and house. Mr. Markson was out on Fernando directing traffic. I was particularly bothered by this as similar truck patterns had occurred Saturday and Sunday. I was also bothered within the context of Mr. McCormick's presentations to the La Quinta Planning Commission and City Council. It seemed to me that Mr. McCormick had been I was further bothered by the fact that he had indicated a desire to route shuttle buses down Fernando with homeowners from developments with no easement rights on Fernando. I went and bought a camera. 3. At 9:30 am a Speedway delivery truck, medium size, with a broken exhaust system arrived. This truck was spraying exhaust everywhere. It was very loud. It smelled up my yard. I took pictures of it idling and reversing on Fernando. I took pictures labeled 3a, 3b, 3c, and 3d. Picture 3a clearly shows the exhaust spewing from the truck. 4. At 9:30 am a Freightliner truck parked idling the wrong way on Fernando. The truck said American Fish. The driver left the truck. Se pictures 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, and 4e. I took pictures of cars exiting the Resort driveway in reverse, backing out blind onto Fernando with their views blocked by the truck. See 4c, and 4d. At 10:13 am an Enterprise truck stops face in the Resort driveway. Lots of exhaust. Backs around to park. Lots of noise. 6. At 10:20 a 70 foot long truck with a 55 foot container arrives and takes over ten minutes to reverse into Resort driveway. Extreme noise and exhaust on my property. Traffic is backed up in both directions. See pictures 6a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, and 1. Truck leaves at 10:38 am. Cannot have unloaded that much. 7. 10:50 am. Two Fed Ex trucks. One a 55 foot container truck. I got pictures of second truck at my driveway, reversing on Fernando. See 7a and 7b. 8. 11:35 am Scully, Triple L Restaurant truck with a 53 foot container. Took 15 minutes to reverse into Resort Driveway. Went onto my driveway apron several times. Loss prevention was there but could 000 7 2,� not prevent it. Two trucks and several cars lined up idling in both directions on Fernando. Lots of fumes and noise. Took pictures 8a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, I, j, k,1, in, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y. Pictures 81, m, n, o, p, q and r show traffic impact which is frequent on Fernando. Pictures 8s, t, u, and v are the trucks that were idling on Fernando while the Scully truck reversed. These trucks also reversed in past my driveway. Pictures 8w, x, and y show how inaccessible the Resort driveway becomes when just one large truck arrives. 9. 11:40 am out of film. I went to get new camera. On Fernando idling were two Roadway medium size trucks. The drivers were out of the trucks walking down the Resort driveway. Gone for the rest of the afternoon. 10. Return at 4 pm. At 4:30 pm a large Roadway truck arrived and reversed down Fernando. Took pictures. At 4:58 pm same truck moves out of driveway into Resort delivery bay. I took pictures. 000724 FRED AND ELAINE PRESS ,R DEF7__ _- 83-218 LAURENCE DRIVE VISTA SANTA ROSA, CAL. 92274 TEL: 760 398-3544, FAX: 760 398-3545 EMAIL: FRED ar,FREDSPRESCOTT.COM, Feb. 23, 2007 Don Adolph, Mayor City of La Quinta P O Box 1504 La Quinta, Ca. 92247, 92253 Dear Don, After reading the article in the 2/23/07 Desert Sun, copy attached, regarding the annexation of Vista Santa Rosa by the City of La Quinta, we wanted to add our names to'the more than 85 residents of Vista Santa Rosa who want our community to be annexed by La Quinta now. We purchased a second home in 1988 at PGA West. We loved driving along Jefferson Avenue on weekends when we visited PGA West which was located at that time in a rural area. Coming from Orange County, our home here in La Quinta offered the best of both worlds, a golfing community surrounded by beautiful open desert spaces. After we moved in 01/07 to Vista Santa Rosa, having lived in La Quinta 19 years-12 years part time and 7 years full time, we decided to purchase a home in rural Vista Santa Rosa. At that time and now also it has been highly published and advertised and common knowledge that the City of La Quinta was going to pursue a viable plan for annexation of Vista Santa Rosa into the City of La Quinta. We`absolutely. behave that , Vista Santa Rosa has a lot to add to the La Quinta Community W, G"I C6,, , W4& 000725 because it is a chance for La Quinta to develop a new concept in residential growth that appeals to a growing number of people who like living in a rural environment with well defined and responsive City Services such as police, fire, roads etc. Please contact us if we can assist you in this annexation p2e7danWd F E aine Prescott 760 398-3544, email: Fred(&FredSPrescott.com. Fax: 760 3998-3545, toll free: 866 898-3544. 000726 I vi U, �.i 4• r•• f,N i , N K N m Oi " N 3 cl) ao m c,7� X v oz a m 3 v !, R y� M 1 i 97 t r1 � 000727 _ =Page 1 of 1 Wanda Wise -Latta ORUW f From: Nancy White [nindoll@comcast.net] CA Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 8:24 AM / To: Wanda Wise -Latta Subject: water park Y Dear Ms. Latta, this is again an email for the mayor and council which I hope you shall convey to them. Thank you, Nancy White Dear Mayor Adolph, I feel a little like a broken record but one dares not let down one's guard relative to the proposed water park. It was such a wonderful ,albeit extremely late, moment when the votes were cast last month by you and the other council members ,but disheartening to know that we all had to continue to fight this monster. People hesitate to rewrite letters, deliver the same comments etc, so many, I fear, will simply be discouraged and worn down by this interminable process. I stayed up later at the council meeting than I even stay up on New Years Eve and I don't know how many times I can do that! Even that night many potential speakers gave up and left so I fear the attrition will continue. We all, of course, got our meeting notices from the city,however, we have no compromise plan to which to react. The notice still says 4.7 acres so it sounds as though there won't be any site reduction ... so what can the compromise be? Maybe 2. water slides instead of $, maybe a 25' high fake mountain instead of a 281? I feel sure the Hilton people, while appearing not to be too bright, are smart enough to have overstated their case to begin with in order to be able to say later that they compromised while ending up with exactly what they wanted in the first place. I spent tg years on the Planning Commission In Ann Arbor, Mi and I know this is one of the oldest tricks in the book. .... i.e. ask for more than you know you can get! Car salesmen do it, home sellers do it and developers do it! The last letter I wrote you begged you to save the integrity of this glorious old hotel and resort, which in turn reflects on the city of La Quinta. I must beg you again to get rid of this project altogether at the proposed location. Leave the tennis facility as it is, leave beautiful center court as it is, ... challenge this water park find a home somewhere else more in keeping with the nature of the beast. Thank you for your time and patience and service to La Quinta. Nancy White 000728 Page 1 of 1 Wanda Wise -Latta r From: Mittelbusher@aol.com Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:54 PM / To: Don Adolph ' C�I✓ Subject: Signature Pool 1 Dear Mayor Adolph, I am a tennis member of the resort and my wife I stayed until the vote last Tuesday night. A large group of tennis members plus year round residents of the Tennis Villas and Santa Rosa Cove want to thank you for your vote to decline the Site Development Permit to build the Signature Pool. We all were impressed with the promise that you elicited from the Resort that if the Signature Pool were built and if in fact the allowable noise levels exceeded City Code, the resort would close the pool until the noise level conformed to the maximum allowed of 60db. Please see the anticipated noise levels in the attached E-mail which were taken from Page 52 of the Addendum for the La Quinta Resort Signature Pool. Since the Resort seemed so sure the maximum noise levels would not violate City Code, HOW ABOUT ASKING THEM IF THEY WOULD AGREE TO SHUT DOWN CONSTRUCTION 1f: THE NOISE LEVELS GO ABOVE THE 60db. After reading condition 1 under the chart, I think it would be most interesting to hear their answer. Thank you again for your no vote. It will be remembered by a lot of full time residents like ourselves. Ed Mittelbusher 77-333 Calle Mazatlan AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com ftttf#fft#R#f#fftfH#iftfRRf#t1MRR###f AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at httpJ/www.aol.com. 000729 1 FEB 2 Edwin M. Mittd. _er _ 1 c� Honorable Mayor Adolph / City Council Members W4 78-A95 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 February 27, 2007 va At the City Council meeting on February 20, 2007,1 proposed a solution to the impasse between the La Quinta Resort and the adjacent property- owners in the Tennis Villas, Mountain Estates, The Enclave, Los Estados, and Santa Rosa Cove. My solution is to move the La Quinta Resort's kiddie water park portion of their Signature Pool to the area now occupied by the Renker pool. To support my solution I am enclosing pages from Architect Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke's khematic design for the proposed Palm Desert Aquatic Complex. Palm Desert got the name right as the proposed project is more than a pool and less than a full-blown water park. I have scaled the site plan on the architect's page J. (0.5 inches equal 40 feet) The complex minus the parking area measures 288 feet east to west and 254 feet south to north. This area totals 73,150 square feet or 1.67 acres. If you eliminate the Competition Swimming Pool and Administrative/ Locker Building leaving only the water park features, the required area is 43,000 square feet. Before reading on, please check the Water Features listed on the architect's page 2. Looks very familiar, doesn't it? Without demolishing the San Fernando Casita, the Renker Pool area is over 47,600 square feet. My solution works and the benefits 1 listed back on February 20, 2007 are enhanced by not having to demolish the San Fernando casita At the end of the last council meeting, you asked the Resort and the property owners to meet and work out a compromise. In a compromise both sides give up something. if my solution is built both sides get what they want. The Resort gets their water slides. lazy river, flow rider, (more fun than a wave pool) and a children's pool/ play structure and property owners maintain the tranquil environment they envisioned when they bought their residences. Let's not forget the Tennis Members. They get to keep playing on the Resort's 23 courts. The Resort's Iconic Stadium court is preserved and the Pacific life Tournament competitors will continue to stay and practice at the Resort. Therefore I respectfully ask the you study Mr. Clarke's site plan and renderings I have enclosed, recognize the benefits, and on the next vote, please vote to decline the La Quinta Resort's Site Development Permit for their Signature Pool at its present location. Since Edwin M. Mitte usher 77-333 Calle Mazatlan La Quinta, CA, 92253 000730 F- 11i ;z- a. 0007 31 m a d CL E O V Cr CD a E m A. i C7 7 s 3 m m w U O c m E to O LL , t_ E- O L` O m m O CL N Im .V, to �# of O E �_ U. N _ 3 3 Q ° N 'o j0 a m N° d 3 s m c rn T U O C m 0= J Q. O b C1 0 J a U.cts U a J to +>'+ 3 LL r y LL C °r a a a � 0 0 0 7 a R I El a rz{ ! 1 4 � r Commissioner Allan Wilbur March 8, 2007 Historic Preservation Commission 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Appreciation History of La Quinta Resort and the Proposed Signature Pool at La Quinta Resort and Club Dear Commissioner Wilbur, Thank you and your Committee for your outstanding leadership that has preserved the identity of our city yet allowed positive direction and admirable progress to La Quinta. It was interesting to learn that the City of La Quinta was founded in 1982, 56 years after La Quinta Resort was built, and is the only city in America named after a resort. We are writing you due to your dedication to serve as an advisory body to the City Council in all matters relating to identification, protection, restoration and retention ofbistoric sites within the City. We are deeply concerned residents that live on the 18' Fairway of the Mountain Course at Santa Rosa Cove. We are also members of The La Quinta Resort and Club. As you know, La Quinta means "Country Retreat" and the La Quinta Resort advertises the Resort as ... "a famous popular destination (escape) world-wide since 1927 ... La Quinta Resort is known for its lush grounds that offers breathtaking beauty and serenity, excellent golf and tennis facilities ..." and continues to mention some famous guests along with additional historic information. The same historic information is also stated on the Guest Activity Marquee posted for group meetings and locations set on the back comer side of the KSL offices across from the Flores Ballroom and Parking Lot. On the enclosed copy of La Quinta Resort's History it tells about the Spanish Conquistadors and mentions that before that time the Cahuilla Indians referred to our area as the "Land of Eternal Sun, " which it is! They state that La Quinta means five and "a secluded country retreat. " Would it be possible for the Historic Preservation Commission to walk around the La Quinta Resort and Club properties and experience the unique and wonderful historic attributes we as a city have inherited, while at the same time considering the magnitude of losing it forever — losing its historic ambient identity by not retaining and preserving this historic site? Could your commission ponder some practical issues as they consider our historic resort ... 1. What will be the effect of the long treasured views of the mountains when they are obliterated? 2. How will the construction activity, for two years, effect the ,citizens that purchased their properties because ofthe views, tranquility, and historic ambiance which indeed sets it apart from other resorts in the world. 3. Will La Quinta Resort lose its stellar identity? ECENA 3 MAR — 9 2007 CIl Y DF-0&9 DOIAMUN P TMELOPFIEM DEPMIMEM 4. Should a water park physically dominate and destroy an historic Country Retreat, La Quinta Resort, our city's namesake? We can appreciate the fact that Hilton wants to create activity here in the summer. However, when Hilton purchased the management for twenty years, La Quinta Resort and Club was, and still is, a resort. Resorts such as winter ski areas, beaches, Carribean, etc., expect down periods. With their world-wide web and marketing we have been delighted to see an incredible increase in occupancy this year. People are starved for the type of ambiance that, regrettably, is offered in few safe havens like the La Quinta Resort. We attended the first public meeting regarding the above mentioned water park and witnessed many misrepresentations of facts presented by CNL representatives and the CNL Attorney in his closing remarks. (Incidentally, Morgan Stanley recently purchased La Quinta Resort & Club from CNL.) For instance, CNL said they had had meetings to advise owners of their plans for the Signature Pool yet very few received the notice of the meetings until after the fact or had an opportunity to see the plans. The meetings were held in the summer when few were here or even knew about them. We want to preserve the historic value of this area. At the same time we support the Hilton, yet, it is most difficult to understand how something like the water park can be approved to be in the middle of our area when it excludes member privileges. Sadly, and regrettably, we were told that the only way members could take our grandchildren to the water park is to purchase a room so they could use the facility that day! However, we, members, would be allowed to use it along with our children up to age 23 providing they live at home full time. How many children or young adults live in Santa Rosa Cove, Los Estados, The Enclave or Mountain Estates? Also, we were told that the decision is final and that there will be no exceptions. Can you imagine what it will be like (after several years of dominating inconveniences and noise) to tell our grandchildren they are not allowed to use the water park when they hear the activity all over our area and even across the street and surrounding gated communities? There is so much more. Thank you for taking your valuable time to review concerns of many of us that are effected. We hope you will encourage Council Members to look at the complete picture so they can vote with a clearer understanding of what was glossed over in the presentations, the impact of loss of an historical landmark known world-wide as a "country retreat," the historic and radical change it will bring to the "world renown La Quinta Resort" which our City is named after. Most S2'��i� i J-� David E. and Barbara S. Waddell 49489 Avenida Vista Bonita La Quinta, CA 92253 TEL 760-777-1176; FAX 760-771-6768 Copy of La Quinta Resort's "Our History" included 000►36 La Quinta Resort and Club I About La Quinta I History Page 1 of 2 WM� ANNIVERSARY La OWNTa, a!!r6NMz ABOUT LA QUINtA General Information Brochures Directions Weather Awards History Send a Postcard Employment La Quinta Resort Leasing California Lifestyle Realty ACCOMMODATIONS History RESERVATIONS - PACKAGES - TEE TIMES . GALLERY . PRESS - OUCOVER CLUB - CONTACT SPA LA QUINTA GOLF Once referred to by the Cahuilla Indians as the "Land of the Eternal Sun," the area we now know as La Quinta is rich in history dating back hundreds of years. In the early 16th century, Spanish conquistadors, TENNIS led by Captain Juan Bautista D'Anza, established La Quinta as the fifth base along a route from Mexico to ACTIVITIES b RECREATION the San Gabriel Mission, La Quinta was the Spanish equivalent to the number five. Quinta, in Mexico, also RESORT DINING means a secluded country retreat, which is exactly what was later developed. MEETINGS S. INCENTNES In 1926, Walter Morgan, the youngest son of a wealthy San Francisco businessman, decided to build a WEDDINGS S. CELEBRATIONS small, secluded retreat in the north end of what was then known as Marshall Cove. Morgan, with the help of CLUB MEMBERSHIP C.N. Sindair of Indio, constructed six adobe cottages, an office, and a lobby and dining facility. The hotel opened in February 1927 and represented a total investment between $150,000 and $200,000. Morgan's SHOPPING goal was to lure Hollywood's rich and famous to a hideaway where they could attend social functions, or VACATION HOME RENTALS simply relax and enjoy the beauty and peacefulness of their own little "casita." The resort, with its original 20 casitas, was the site of the Coachella Valley's first golf course. Hollywood's brightest stars were regular patrons. Frank Capra came to the hotel to write a movie script and the result, "It Happened One Night," became such a success, Capra declared the spot his good luck charm AM,.l Dale and returned to the same casita to write other scripts. Other regulars at the resort included Bette Davis, 3 11 A97--- _ /� Clark Gable, Errol Flynn, Katherine Hepburn, Eddie Cantor, Greta Garbo, and Shirley Temple. nepertmc 0,!e 3 14 2007 ___- _ —. An international dien[ete of political dignitaries, business leaders and sports heroes often "esraped" to La Quinta for recreation and relaxation amid an atmosphere of exclusivity and privacy. search The only hotel to have an incorporated city named after It, the 640-kasha La Quinta Resort & Club has preserved the charm and serene ambiance of its glorious past while offering guests the finest in resort amenities and services, including five resort golf courses, one of the nation's top tennis clubs, a full -service spa and fitness center, exclusive dining and resort shopping. 49-499 Eisenhower Drive P.O. Box 69 La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: 760.564.4111 Phone: 800.598.3828 Fax: 760.5640 0 1)E ryry Email Directory J http://www.laquintmsort.com/abouvbistory.asp 3/8/2007 ragc r ur r Carolyn Walker From: Mason Lord Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:28 PM To: Carolyn Walker Subject: FW: Members of Planning Commission re: LA Resort water park From: Tennisqutti@aol.com [mailto:Tennisqutd@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:09 PM To: Mason Lord Subject: Members of Planning Commission re: LA Resort water park 'To all members of the LQ City Planning Commission: II have written many previous letters opposing the proposed La Quinta Resort water park. II have owned my Tennis Villa since 1989 and have enjoyed the tranquilly of the desert and the beautiful ambiance of the resort. I play tennis and appreciate the world Gass reputation the resort has established as a tennis venue. I can not understand why the resort does not develop the tennis market. It is there! 'The Pacific Life Tennis Tournament has proved it. The attendees at this event are real tennis fans and players. II have mentionned the proposed water park plan to many people whom I have met at the resort this week. They have been shocked and definitive about not returning to stay at the resort if the plan is executed. Build a tennis program and they will come! Get original! All the hotels have a water park.lt's a passing fad. II vehemently oppose the project. This entertainment/ water park venue should not be permitted so close to private residents. The meandering river with screaming kids in inner tubes will be only 6 feet away from the 'Tennis Villa property lines. Music and party noise from possibly a thousand people will be scheduled in the evening. The construction of the fake mountains to house the water slides is a visual intrusion and will block the views of the Santa Rosa Mountains. In short, owners of the Tennis Villas will be negatively impacted both in quality of life and the market value of their property. li urge you to vote against this project. Sincerely, Ruth Utti 76-946 Calle Mazatlan La Quinta, CA AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. O00739 3✓13/2007