Loading...
2007 10 02 RDAeirf 4 #OdA Redevelopment Agency agendas are available on the City' web page @ www.la-quinta.org REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quints, California 92253 Regular Meeting TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2007 3:00 P.M. Closed Session / 4:00 P.M. Open Session Beginning Resolution No. RA 2007-013 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Agency Board Members: Adolph, Henderson, Kirk, Sniff, and Chairman Osborne PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CLOSED SESSION NOTE: Time permitting the Redevelopment Agency Board may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. In addition, persons identified as negotiating parties are not invited into the Closed Session meeting when acquisition of real property is considered. 1. CONFERENCE WITH AGENCY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, DOUGLAS R. EVANS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 111 AND LA QUINTA CENTRE DRIVE. PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: TORRE NISSAN, GEORGE VELARDE Redevelopment Agency Agenda 1 October 2, 2007 2. CONFERENCE WITH AGENCY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, DOUGLAS R. EVANS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS APN 649-030- 016, AND -017. PROPERTY OWNERS/NEGOTIATORS: JERRY JOHNSON, DESERT EUROPEAN MOTOR CARS, LTD. 3. CONFERENCE WITH AGENCY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, DOUGLAS R. EVANS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED AS APN 770-040- 012, AND -013. PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: URBAN HOUSING COMMUNITIES, ROGER DAVILA. 4. CONFERENCE WITH AGENCY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, DOUGLAS R. EVANS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 78-990 MILES AVENUE (APN 604-032-022). PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA, ALFREDO IZMAJTOVICH. 5. CONFERENCE WITH AGENCY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, DOUGLAS R. EVANS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS APN 767-220-004. PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: TURNER DEVELOPMENT, RUSTY TURNER. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA .'0a2 Redevelopment Agency Agenda 2 October 2, 2007 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 2007. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED OCTOBER 2, 2007. 2. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO OBTAIN PM10 SERVICES FOR SILVERROCK RESORT. 3. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE EISENHOWER DRIVE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2007-18. 4. APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE UNASSIGNED REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDING TO THE AVENUE 52 MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2006-03. 5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) AND CONSENTING TO THE USE OF PROJECT AREA NO. 2 REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2006-16. BUSINESS SESSION CONSIDERATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NESTOR AND GAFFNEY ARCHITECTS FOR LEED CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE SILVERROCK RESORT CLUBHOUSE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF SILVERROCK RESORT CLUBHOUSE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND BUDGET. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION b0-a Redevelopment Agency Agenda 3 October 2, 2007 STUDY SESSION - NONE CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBERS' ITEMS - NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held on October 16, 2007, commencing with closed session at 3:00 p.m. and open session at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Veronica Montecino, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency meeting of October 2, 2007, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber at 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin boards at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas and 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on September 28, 2007. DATED: Aeptember 28„ 2007 f VERONICA J. MbNTECINO, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 004 Redevelopment Agency Agenda 4 October 2, 2007 , P1W0i%*PR%s!Z, COUNCHJRDA MEETING DATE: October 02, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated October 02, 2007 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Redevelopment Agency Board: Receive and File the Demand Register Dated October 02, 2007 of which $653,977.61 represents Redevelopment Agency Expenditures AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION haSMgNJIIWACIlue, PLEASE SEE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NUMBER 1 ON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA a. 005 ceity/ 4 XP QKiKrcv AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: October 2, 2007 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Request for Proposals to STUDY SESSION: Obtain PM-10 Services for SilverRock Resort PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends continuance of this Item to October 16, 2007. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: None. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the Agency Board include: 1 . Continue this item until October 16, 2007; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, die ylton Community Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director 006 a F'y OF T13E9 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: October 2, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Making Certain Findings Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a) and Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds for the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2007-18 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: l' STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of La Quinta making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a) and authorizing the expenditure of funds for the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2007-18. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Eisenhower Drive (Avenue 50 to 1600 feet north) The following is the project funding source: RDA Project Area No. 1 Total Funding Available: The following is the project budget: Design: Inspection/Testing/Survey: Construction: Contingency: Total: $620,501 $620,501 $42,125 $32,647 $421,250 $124,479 $620,501 007 Adequate funding is available to support staff's recommendation. As part of the funding process the City of La Quinta City Council is required to adopt a similar resolution making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a) and authorizing the expenditure of funds for the Eisenhower Drive improvement. Staff believes that the facts supporting the findings exist with regard to these improvements. Specifically, these improvements will provide a direct benefit to Project Area No. 1 and its residents by reconstructing Eisenhower Drive. No other readily available funds exist for these expenditures. The improvements are consistent with the Implementation Plan for Project Area No. 1, and will help to eliminate substandard surface streets, which was one of the blighting conditions identified in connection to Project Area No. 1. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements (Avenue 50 to approximately 1600 feet north (west side only) The proposed improvements include rehabilitating the road by removing and reconstructing the street section the pavement within the two southbound travel lanes, (approximately 32 feet wide) on the west side of Eisenhower Drive from Avenue 50 to approximately 1600 feet north. The design engineer will be expected to core the existing pavement section to determine pavement thickness and recommend the most appropriate and cost effective pavement reconstruction method. On September 18, 2007, the City Council authorize staff to distribute a Request for Proposal (RFP) to obtain professional engineering services to prepare the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) of probable construction costs for the Avenue 58 and Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2007-18; and appointed a consultant selection committee. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the Agency include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of La Quinta making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a) and authorizing the expenditure of funds for the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2007-18; or 008 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of La Quinta making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a) and do not authorize the expenditure of funds for the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2007-18; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, othy R. nas P.E. Public Works Direc or/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director 1.; 009 RESOLUTION NO. RA 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EISENHOWER DRIVE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements are located in La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 (the "Project Area"); and WHEREAS, Eisenhower Drive is documented as a condition of blight within the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the construction of the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements would afford the Agency the opportunity to address the aforementioned condition of blight; and WHEREAS, there is inadequate funding within the City's General Fund or from other sources to construct the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements; and WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the public to construct the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are adopted as the findings of the Agency Board. SECTION 2. The Agency Board hereby authorizes Agency funding to be utilized for the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements. SECTION 3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a), the Agency finds and determines that: A. The construction of the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements is of benefit to the Project Area and to the immediate neighborhood in which the Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements are located. B. No other reasonable means of financing the improvements are available to the community. 4.. 010 Resolution RA 2007- Eisenhower Rehabilitation Adopted: October 2. 2007 Page 2 C. The Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the Project Area, and is consistent with the Agency's implementation plan adopted pursuant to Section 33490. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency held on this 2nd day of October, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LEE OSBORNE, Chairperson La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CIVIC, Agency Secretary La Quinta Redevelopment Agency APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, Agency Counsel La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, California oil La � Q COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: October 2, 2007 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: Approval to Appropriate Unassigned Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Funding to the Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2006-03 RECOMMENDATION: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Appropriate an additional $571,600 of unassigned RDA Project Area Number 1 funding to the Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation Improvements, Project Number 2006-03. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Contingent upon the appropriation of an additional $571,600 of unassigned RDA Project Area Number 1 funding to the Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation Improvements, Project Number 2006-03, the following is the proposed funding and funding sources: RDA Project Area Number 1 $1,176,600 Total Funding Available: $1,176,600 The following represents the anticipated project budget: Design: Inspection/Testing/Survey: Construction: Administration: Contingency: Total: $ 60, 500 $46,888 $978,462 $30,250 $ 60, 500 $1,176,600 a 012 The project was originally assigned RDA Project Area Number 1 funds in the amount of $605,000. An additional appropriation in the amount of $571,600 is necessary to cover the shortfall between the approved project budget and the anticipated construction costs. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The project is 100% funded with Redevelopment Agency Project Area Number 1 funds. As such, the project was bid with prevailing wage requirements. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The project is located on Avenue 52 from Washington Street to Jefferson Street. The proposed landscape improvements will rehabilitate the existing landscaping to include installing new drought tolerance landscape, drip irrigation, and median island lighting. The landscape palette is based on the City Council approved "desertscape" theme for primary image corridors. The project limits were originally approved on Avenue 52, from Calle Rondo to Jefferson Street. The new limits, from Washington Street to Jefferson Street, are approximately one -quarter mile longer. Extending the project will allow the City's "desertscape" palette to be installed consistently within the median island. The project was advertised with a Base Bid Area which included the project limits between Jefferson Street and Calle Rondo, and Additive Alternate Number 1 with the balance of the project limits between Calle Rondo and Washington Street. The Avenue 52 landscaping has been designed to be compatible with the landscaping theme within the parkway adjacent to the SilverRock Resort. However, the landscaping will be further enhanced once the Landscape Architect for the Phase II SilverRock Resort has completed the overall landscape theme for the Resort. This interim improvement is necessary to clean-up the medians in time for the upcoming Bob Hope Classic. On May 2, 2006, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2006/2007 through Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The proposed improvements are included within the adopted CIP and scheduled for funding during Fiscal Year 2006/2007. 013 On August 7, 2007, the City Council approved the Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) and authorized staff to advertise for bid the Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project Number 2006-03. On September 6, 2007, three sealed bids were received for the construction of this project. Park West Landscape, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive combined bid in the amount of $978,642. The basis of award was the lowest combined price of the Base Bid Area plus Additive Alternate 1. On September 18, 2007, the City Council appropriated unassigned RDA Project Area Number 1 funding in the amount of $571,600; and awarded a contract to Park West Landscape, Inc., in the amount of $978,462, to construct the Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Washington Street (Base Bid Area plus Additive Alternate Number 1). This action was contingent upon the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency's (RDA) subsequent action to appropriate additional Project Area Number 1 funding toward the proposed improvements. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the Agency include: 1. Appropriate an additional $571,600 of unassigned RDA Project Area Number 1 funding to the Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation Improvements, Project Number 2006-03; or 2. Do not appropriate an additional $571,600 of unassigned RDA Project Area Number 1 funding to the Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation Improvements, Project Number 2006-03; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, n othy R. Jo ass/s n P.E. Public Works ire /City Engineer 014 Approved for submission by: �6'Uvit-�G�' �.ti'P�✓t�-P� Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director D. 015 F Qu&rcu y OF7 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: October 2, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and Authorization to Advertise for Bid the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project No. 2006-16 and Adoption of a Resolution Making Certain Findings Pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33445 (a) RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: r CONSENT CALENDAR: V STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt the attached resolution making findings pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33445 and consenting to the use of Project Area No. 2 redevelopment funds for the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project Number 2006-16. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: On May 1, 2007, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 through Fiscal Year 201 1 /2012 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Westward Ho Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk in the amount of $275,000 was included within the adopted CIP and scheduled for funding during Fiscal Year 2007/2008. Two other minor improvements have been identified as being needed to address safety needs within the same area. These two projects include the installation of an emergency flashing beacon on Adams Street adjacent to La Quinta Fire Station No. 93, and a minor modification to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Adams Street and Fred Waring Drive. Based upon the Engineer's estimate of probable construction costs for these three projects, staff believes all three projects can be constructed for the budget previously approved for the Westward Ho Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk. 016 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project Number 2006-16 includes three minor projects at separate locations. The first project is the Westward Ho Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk near the La Quinta High School. The second project is the Adams Street emergency flashing beacon adjacent to the La Quinta Fire Station. The third project is a modification to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Adams Street and Fred Waring Drive. On May 1, 2007, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 through Fiscal Year 201 1 /2012 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Westward Ho Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk is included within the adopted CIP and scheduled for funding during Fiscal Year 2007/2008. The Adams Street emergency flashing beacon and the Adams Street/Fred Waring Drive Traffic Signal Modification are minor projects that were identified outside the normal budgeting process. The PS&E for Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements is now complete and available for review within the City's Public Works Department. Contingent upon City Council authorization to advertise the project for bid on October 2, 2007, the following represents the anticipated project schedule: City Council Approves PS&E Project is Advertised City Council Awards Contract Sign Contracts and Mobilize Construction Project Close-out FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: October 2, 2007 October 2 — 31, 2007 November 20, 2007 November 21 — 30, 2007 December 2007 — March 2008 April 2008 The alternatives available to the Agency include: 1. Adopt the attached resolution making findings pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33445 and consenting to the use of Project Area No. 2 redevelopment funds for the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project Number 2006-16; or 017 The following is the approved funding and funding source for the Westward Ho Drive Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk: RDA Project Area Number 2 $275,000 Total Funding Available: $275,000 Based upon the combined Engineer's estimate of probable construction costs in the amount of $201,230, the following is the estimated project budget for the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project 2006-16: Professional: $6,874 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $32,146 Construction (Westward Ho Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk): $118,730 Construction (Adams St. Emergency Flashing Beacon) $59,500 Construction (Adams @ Fred Waring Signal Modification) $23,000 Contingency: $34,750 Total: $ 275,000 Adequate funding is available to construct all three improvements for the amount budgeted for the Westward Ho Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk. All three of these projects are similar in nature and scope. Advertising the project for construction under one contract should result in an overall cost savings to the City. Considering RDA Project Area No. 2 funds will be used, the City Council along with the Redevelopment Agency will be required to adopt a resolution making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a) and authorizing the expenditure of funds for the Adams Street emergency flashing beacon, and for the minor modification to the existing Traffic Signal at the intersection of Adams Street and Fred Waring Drive. The appropriate resolutions are included for City Council and Redevelopment Agency consideration. Staff believes that the facts supporting the findings exist with regard to these improvements. Specifically, these improvements will provide a direct benefit to Project Area No. 2 and its residents by improving traffic safety. No other readily available funds exist for these expenditures. The improvements are consistent with the Implementation Plan for Project Area No. 2, and will help to eliminate inadequate infrastructure, which was one of the blighting conditions identified in connection to Project Area No. 2. a 018 2. Do not adopt the attached resolution making findings pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33445 and consenting to the use of Project Area No. 2 redevelopment funds for the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project Number 2006-16; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, T othy R. on s n, P.E. Public Wo s Di ctor/City Engineer Approved for submission by: /.- Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director 019 RESOLUTION NO. RA 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project Number 2006-16, are located in La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 (the "Project Area"); and WHEREAS, the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements, Project Number 2006-16, consist of the installation of an emergency flashing beacon on Adams street adjacent to La Quinta Fire Station No. 93, minor modifications to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Adams Street and Fred Waring Drive, and installation of the Westward Ho Drive Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk; and WHEREAS, the locations in which these improvements will be installed are documented as a condition of blight within the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the construction of the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements would afford the City's Redevelopment Agency the opportunity to address the aforementioned condition of blight; and WHEREAS, there is inadequate funding within the City's General Fund or from other sources to construct the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements; and WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the public to construct the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are adopted as the findings of the Agency Board. SECTION 2. The Agency Board hereby authorizes Agency funding to be utilized for the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements. SECTION 3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a), the Agency finds and determines that: 020 Resolution RA 2007- CW Traffic Safety Adopted: October 2, 2007 Page 2 A. The construction of the Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements is of benefit to the Project Area and to the immediate neighborhoods in which the Improvements are located. B. No other reasonable means of financing the improvements are available to the community. C. The Citywide Traffic Safety Improvements will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the Project Area, and is consistent with the Redevelopment Agency's implementation plan adopted pursuant to Section 33490. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency held on this 2nd day of October, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LEE OSBORNE, Chairperson La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, Agency Secretary La Quinta Redevelopment Agency APPROVED AS TO FORM: 021 Resolution RA 2007- CW Traffic Safety Adopted: October 2, 2007 Page 3 M. KATHERINE JENSON, Agency Counsel La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 022 ce4&t 4 4� Qu&rcu COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: October 2, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Nestor + Gaffney Architects for LEED Consulting Services for the SilverRock Resort Clubhouse RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: I.31�91►1�XY.YDf.X� [1) `�Ei CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Nestor + Gaffney Architects ("NGA") for Architectural Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Consulting Services for the SilverRock Resort Permanent Clubhouse and authorize the Executive Director to execute the Agreement subject to any minor modifications approved by the Executive Director and Agency Counsel. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The SilverRock Resort permanent clubhouse is contained within the fiscal year 2007-08 Capital Improvement Program, and includes funding for design as follows: Task Budget Design (Engineering) $1,404,000 CM/Testing/Inspections $775,000 Construction $18,674,000 Contingency $4,559,010 Total $25,412,010 The proposed contract amount is $114,000. The fixed fee budget includes: architectural LEED consulting services ($84,000); and third -party testing and validation services by an approved commissioning authority ($30,000). i 023 The table below shows the total anticipated cost of LEED certification, which includes the NGA contract, US Green Building Council fees; mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineering costs; and additional construction costs: ITEM COST DESCRIPTIION BUDGET CATEGORY NGA $ 84,000 Architectural LEED Consultant Design Commisioning Authority $ 30,000 Subcontracted to NGA Inspection USGBC $ 5,100 Registration and Certification Fees. Inspection MEP Engineering $ 13,000 Estimated costs for additional modeling and Design maximizing Title 24 efficiencies General Contractor $ 30 000 Estimated costs associated with documentation, Construction additional monitoriting, and material storage and containment during construction TOTAL $ 162,100 Estimated cost to acquire LEED certification NGA's contract will be charged to account number 401-1774-551.35-07; however, when all design -related costs (engineering, project management, building architecture, LEED consultant, landscape architecture, water feature design, future lighting design, future waterproofing design, and various fees) are calculated, the design costs exceed the design budget. As part of the overall clubhouse budgeting, the design fees will be included in future RDA budget discussions. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On April 17, 2007, the Agency Board approved a contract with Altevers Associates for design of the SilverRock Resort permanent clubhouse. The first phase of work is the preparation of a preliminary program (i.e., conceptual site and floor plans). The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the preliminary program at its September 25, 2007 meeting. The Planning Commission discussion focused on energy efficiency and water conservation, including direction to pursue LEED certification. In addition, the Agency Board and City Council have indicated their desire to incorporate green building practices in new projects, with Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes being a prime example. The "Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design" ("LEED") certification program was formulated by the U. S. • 024 Green Building Council ("USGBC"). According to the USGBC, "LEED certified projects blend environmental, economic, occupant -oriented performance. They cost less to operate and maintain, are energy- and water -efficient, and are a physical demonstration of the values of the organizations that own and occupy them." Projects are awarded Certified, Silver, Gold, or Platinum certification depending on the number of credits they achieve. NGA has met with Altevers Associates and reviewed the latest conceptual plans. Their initial assessment is that the project has the potential to achieve a silver certification. Because of the detail involved in LEED certification, it is common practice today to hire a firm that specializes in LEED to assist with the process. Because of the Agency's prior positive experience with NGA on the Vista Dunes project, staff has solicited a proposal from them for LEED consultation. The Scope of Services is divided into five components, including: 1. Feasibility Study/Design Development — Throughout the schematic and design development phase, the LEED consultant will attend meetings, review and provide comments on documents for the project including plans, elevations, and specifications. They will prepare, maintain and review checklists aimed at tracking project scoring and will assist in the RFI process during bidding. 2. Construction Phase Services — Throughout the 12 month construction period of the project, the consultant will attend on -site construction meetings, provide continuous monitoring and review of project status as it relates to LEED-NC ongoing checklist. The consultant will document and track ongoing action items and individual tasks as they relate to LEED; and coordinate with the Commissioning Authority responsible for third party validation of building performance. 3. USGBC Submittal/Review/Acceptance — During the construction phase, NGA will coordinate acquiring the required documents for presentation to USGBC. These documents will be presented in a time to coordinate with the project completion to be reviewed and ultimately accepted by the USGBC to achieve an overall rating. 4. LEED Architectural Certification Assistance — This phase will include preparation of graphical exhibits as required by LEED-NC for submittal of credits as necessary, including credits which fall under requirements for the Architect of Record. This phase will also include supplemental review of project submittals for compliance with LEED requirements. 025 5. LEED MEP Certification - This Task will include meetings and coordination with MEP consultants to the Architect of Record and the Commissioning Agent. Meetings will focus on requirements of the project that directly relate to the LEED program mandatory requirements as well as goal points in the Checklist. NGA will provide direction and examples to aid in LEED documentation that is required to be completed by the MEP consultants. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the Agency Board include: 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with NGA for Architectural LEED Consulting Services for the SilverRock Resort Permanent Clubhouse and authorize the Executive Director to execute the Agreement subject to any minor modifications approved by the Executive Director and Agency Counsel; or 2. Do not approve a Professional Services Agreement with NGA for Architectural LEED Consulting Services for the SilverRock Resort Permanent Clubhouse; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Douglas . Ev s, Assistant City Manager — Development Services Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director Attachment 1: PSA with Nestor + Gaffney Architects MOOKIIII ATTACHMENT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("Agency"), and NESTOR + GAFFNEY ARCHITECTURE, LLP ("Consultant"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services related to architectural LEED consuling services for the SilverRock permanent clubhouse, as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work"). Consultant warrants that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the Agency of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.4 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by Agency, Consultant, shall immediately inform Agency of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). A. 027 1.5 Care of Work and Standard of Work. a. Care of Work. Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work performed by Consultant, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by Agency, except such losses or damages as may be caused by Agency's own negligence. The performance of services by Consultant shall not relieve Consultant from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work at no further cost to Agency, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Consultant. b. Standard of Work. Consultant acknowledges and understands that the services and work contracted for under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that, consistent with this understanding, Consultant's services and work will be held to a heightened standard of quality and workmanship. Consistent with Section 1.4 hereinabove, Consultant represents to Agency that it holds the necessary skills and abilities to satisfy the heightened standard of work as set forth in this Agreement. 1.6 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Consultant shall not be required to perform any additional services without compensation. Any addition in compensation not exceeding five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increase must be approved by the Agency Board. 1.7 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in Exhibit "D" (the "Special Requirements"). In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special (Requirements shall govern. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with Exhibit "B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed One Hundred Fourteen Thousand Dollars ($114,00) (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.6. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, payment for time and materials based upon Consultant's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other 028 methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation will not include reimbursement expeditures. 2.2 Method of Payment. Any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, Consultant shall submit to Agency no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by Agency's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Consultant specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Agency will pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by Agency pursuant to this Agreement no later than thirty (30) days after invoices are received by the Agency's Finance Department. 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in Exhibit "C" (the "Schedule of Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than Agency, and unusually severe weather, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his or her judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Sections 7.7 or 7.8 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until i. 029 completion of the services, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance. 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Ronald Nestor, AIA, Principal It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for Agency to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The foregoing principals may not be changed by Consultant and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of Agency. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director or such other person as may be designated by the Agency's Executive Director. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and Consultant shall refer any decisions, which must be made by Agency to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of Agency required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for Agency to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of Agency. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of Agency. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither Agency nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of Agency and shall remain at all times as to Agency a wholly independent A. 039 contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of Agency. 4.5 Agency Cooperation. Agency shall provide Consultant with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Consultant only from or through action by Agency. 5.0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. 5.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, personal and public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Consultant's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither Agency nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming Agency and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by Agency prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: Contract Sum Personal Injury/Property Damage Coverage Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence $50,000 - $300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence Consultant shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Consultant, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Consultant, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. If Consultant or Consultant's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be 031 primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither Agency nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming Agency and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by Agency prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Consultant shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of" the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the State of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of "A" or better and a minimum financial size VII. All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days written notice to Agency of proposed cancellation. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to indemnify Agency, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. 5.2 Indemnification. a. General Indemnification Provision. 1. Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Agency and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Consultant or subconsultants), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in 032 connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are cause in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit C without the written consent of the Consultant. 2. Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Agency, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant ' or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subconsultants of Consultant. 3. Standard Indemnification Provisions. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth herein this section from each and every subconsultant or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of Agency to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on Agency and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend Agency as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this agreement or this section. 4. Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction. Without affecting the rights of Agency under any provision of this agreement, Consultant shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless Agency for liability attributable to the active negligence of Agency, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where Agency is shown to have been actively negligent and where Agency's active negligence accounts for only a percentage of +. 033 the liability involved, the obligation of Consultant will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of Agency. b. Indemnification Provision for Design Professionals. 1. Applicability of Section 5.2(b). Notwithstanding Section 5.2(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to Consultants who constitute "design professionals" as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below. 2. Scope of Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Agency and Agency's agents, officers, officials, employees, representatives, and departments ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Consultant or subconsultants), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, any subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone that they control. 3. Design Professional Defined. As used in this Section 5.2(b), the term "design professional" shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code § 2782.8. 5.3 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies Agency may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, Agency may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement.' b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. j... 034 Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies Agency may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Consultant's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 5.4 General Conditions pertaining to provisions of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and Agency agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds Agency, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition prior to 1992, or its equivalent. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against Agency regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the Agency or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to Agency and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the Agency, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect Agency's protection without Agency's prior written consent. 035 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability policy, shall be delivered to Agency at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, Agency has the right , but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by Agency shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at Agency option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide thirty (30) days notice to Agency of any cancellation of coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, or that any party will "endeavor" (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self insurance available to Agency. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to Agency for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self -insure or to use any self -insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to Agency, If Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self -insured retention, the deductible or self -insured retention must be declared to the Agency. At that time the Agency shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self -insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. A.- 036 12. The Agency reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the Agency will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to Agency. 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of Agency to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on Agency nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as Agency, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until Agency executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to Agency within five (5) days of the expiration of coverages. 17. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to Agency, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all-inclusive. A. 037 19. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20. The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge Agency or Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to Agency. It is not the intent of Agency to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against Agency for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to Agency of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. Agency assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve Agency. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS. 6.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of Agency and shall be delivered to Agency upon termination of this Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by Agency of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant shall cause all 038 subcontractors to assign to Agency any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify Agency for all damages suffered thereby. In the event Agency or any person, firm or corporation authorized by Agency reuses said documents and materials without written verification or adaptation by Consultant for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said documents and materials, Agency hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Consultant from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the completion of this Contract and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of Agency, except as required by law or as authorized by Agency. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, Agency may take such immediate action as Agency deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit Agency's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8. 039 7.3 Retention of Funds. Agency may withhold from any monies payable to Consultant sufficient funds to compensate Agency for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by Agency due to the default of Consultant in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Agency's consent or approval of any act by Consultant requiring Agency's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary Agency's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Consultant. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.8 for termination for cause. Agency reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. 7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Agency may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds 040 the compensation herein stipulated (provided that Agency shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and Agency may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed Agency as previously stated in Section 7.3. 7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 AGENCY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 8.1 Non -liability of Agency Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of Agency shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by Agency or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of Agency shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which she or he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or general consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry. 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. J. 041 To Agency: LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Attention: Thomas P. Genovese Executive Director 78-495 Calle Tampico P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92247-1504 To Consultant: NESTOR + GAFFNEY ARCHITECTURE, LLP Ronald Nestor, AIA, Principal 305 West Fourth Street Santa Ana, California 92701 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understanding, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. 9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director Date 042 ATTEST: Veronica J. Montecino, CMC, Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, Agency Counsel CONSULTANT Name: Ronald Nestor, AIA Nestor + Gaffney Architecture, LLP Title: Principal Date: 00 Exhibit A Scope of Services SilverRock Clubhouse NGA as Architectural LEED consultant Scope of service proposal is reflective of Project design presented for meeting on 8/28/07 which included Altevers Associates Sheet A2-060, A2-200, & A2-210, all dated 6 August 2007. This proposal is also reflective of the Schedule of Performance — Exhibit C, as received on April 10, 2007. Any changes to the design or schedule may result in changes to fees and scope of services. At the time of this meeting, the LEED checklist was reviewed and with minimal changes to the Design, it is estimated that the project can attain approximately a Silver rating under the LEED- NC rating system. TASK 1- Feasibility Study/Design Development — Throughout the Schematic and Design Development Phase, NGA will prepare a preliminary Checklist and review with the Team. Unless noted otherwise, Team refers to Agency Staff, Golf Dimensions, and Altevers and Associates. NGA will prepare a comment section for each item that the Team is or may be pursuing. This Task will include attending a maximum of 14 meetings in the 12 month Schedule ending with the start of the Construction Phase. NGA will present an agenda for each meeting's LEED discussion and follow up comments as well as task items as necessary. During this time NGA will review and provide feedback comments on Documents for the Project including plans, elevations, as well as specifications. This Task will also include aiding in the RFI process during bidding as required for LEED items. TASK 2- Construction Phase Services — Through the 12 month Construction Phase of the Project NGA will attend a maximum of 12 meetings. NGA will provide continuous review of Project status as it relates to the LEED-NC ongoing checklist. This Task will also include ongoing Action item direction and NGA will prepare a agenda for each meeting as well as follow up comments and task items as necessary. The meetings for this Phase should be a portion of the on -site construction meetings and the Contractor, Owner, and Architect should be present during these meetings. NGA will also coordinate with the Commissioning Authority who will be required at meetings when necessary. TASK 3- USGBC Submittal/Review/Acceptance — During the Construction Phase of the Project NGA will coordinate acquiring the required Documents for presentation to USGBC. This Task will include compiling the required documents from all entities applicable into a binder. This binder will be presented in a time to coordinate with the Project completion to be reviewed and ultimately accepted by the USGBC to achieve an overall rating. This Task does not include preparation of graphic exhibits as described separately in Task 4. TASK 4- LEED Architectural Certification Assistance - This Phase will include preparation of graphic exhibits as required by LEED-NC for submittal of credits as required. NGA will utilize architectural AutoCadd backgrounds from the Architect of Record for this Phase and any other consultants as necessary, and will prepare 8.5 x 11 or 11 x 17 documents for the LEED Binder for credits which fall under requirements for the Architect of Record. This Phase will also include supplemental review of Project submittals for compliance with LEED requirements. TASK 5 — LEED MEP Certification. This Task will include 6 separate meetings and coordination with MEP consultants to the Architect of Record. Meetings will focus on requirements of the Project that directly relate to the LEED program mandatory requirements as well as goal points in the Checklist. This Task will also include NGA attendance at meetings with MEP consultants and Commissioning Agent for coordination. NGA will also provide direction and examples in meetings to aid in LEED documentation that are required to be completed by the MEP consultants. These Tasks will not guarantee compliance by any of the Parties listed above, or any other Parties involved in the process. All effort will be made to maintain the Goal points achieved and any deviations from this, known to NGA will be brought to the attention of the Agency immediately. Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation Architectural and Engineering Compensation for architectural and engineering services will be a fixed fee as defined below: TASK nRSCRTPTTf1N YMr11 Feasibility StudylDesign Development $20,000 Construction Phase Services $24,000 USGBC/SubmiliaUReview/Acce lance $15,000 LEED Architectural Certification Assistance $12,000 LEED MEP Cerli rcation $13,000 TOTAL $84 000 Commissioning Authority 1 $30,000 The above services shall be billed as a percentage of completion on a monthly basis and are subject to review and approval by the Contract Officer. In the event the Agency exercises it right to terminate the agreement by giving the notice provided for in Section 7.7, the Agency shall only be responsible for paying for the percentage of the fee that reflects the percentage of completion. Reimbursable Expenses There are no reimbursable expenses. O`YL Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Consultants Project Schedule is directly parallel to the clubhouse architects schedule attached and made a part of this agreement. Consultant shall complete services presented within the scope of work contained within Exhibit "A" in accordance with the attached project schedule. . 041 a 0 ga �o s s � 3 S e o a F u O N 'a S I R q U�-voo p ° _F Naaz�r ;aaa ms: 1. 048 Exhibit D Special Requirements Increase/Decrease in Scope of Project Consultant's Scope of service proposal is reflective of Project design presented for meeting on 8/28/07 which included Altevers Associates Sheet A2-060, A2-200, & A2-210, all dated 6 August 2007. This proposal is also reflective of the Schedule of Performance - Exhibit C. Any substantive changes to the design or schedule may result in changes to fees and scope of services. Owner's Obligations Agency will pay LEED-NC registration and certification fees to USGBC. Limitation of Damages Agency and Consultant agree that breach of this Agreement and liability for any and all actions involving, arising from, or related to this Agreement will result in damages that are difficult to ascertain. Therefore, the parties agree that the total amount of damages recoverable by Agency from Consultant in any action of claim shall not exceed the amount of E&O insurance available, which is an amount that Agency and Consultant agree is a reasonable approximation of damages under this Agreement. Hourly Based Services and Additional Services Hourly Ibased services and additional services will be provided by Consultant if requested by Agency in writing executed by the Executive Director. Additional services will include revisions to previously approved plans, additional entitlement exhibits, and additional meetings and presentations. Additional services will be paid by Agency monthly and invoiced on an hourly basis in accordance with the following schedule of rates. Architectural Services Principal $195.00/hour Sr. Designer $140.00/hour Associate $120.00/hour Project Architect $100.00/hour Designer $ 90.00/hour Clerical $ 50.00/hour 2. If the basic services covered by this Agreement have not been completed within thirty (26) months of the date hereof, through no fault of Consultant, extension of Consultant's services beyond that time shall be compensated as hourly based services or a negotiated fixed amount. Payment to Architect 049 Payments on account of Consultant's basic services, Additional Services shall be made monthly upon presentation of Consultant's statement of services rendered. 2. For additional services of subconsultants, a multiple of one point one five (1.15) times the amounts billed to Consultant for such services. 059 4 XP QK!Arry F AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: October 2, 2007 BUSINESS SESSION: o� ITEM TITLE: Consideration of SilverRock Resort Clubhouse Program Development and Budget CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff with comment and direction regarding the Permanent Clubhouse programming based on plans and exhibits prepared by the Altevers Associates; and provide comment and direction in regard to the estimate of cost prepared by the Golf Dimensions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Phase II SilverRock Resort improvements are included within the adopted 2007-2008 Capital Improvement Program. Project components include: infrastructure, permanent clubhouse, second golf course, and entry feature/roads. The Permanent Clubhouse component includes funding for the engineering and construction as follows: Task Budget Design (Engineering) $1,404,000- CM/Testing/Inspections $775,000 Construction $18,674,000 Contingency $4,559 010 Total $25,412,010 The preliminary budget estimate shows that the cost of the building and site improvements to be approximately $27,460,465 plus contingency, City, CVWD, and other fees. This figure exceeds the budget estimate in the CIP. The proposed preliminary plan includes a number of improvements that were not considered in J. 051 the CIP budget including the following elements: a new lake, increased building size, increased site area, additional parking, LEED Certification, expanded outdoor events areas, and practice green. These enhanced amenities or programs are estimated to cost approximately $2,860,654. At this time the RDA does not need to modify the project budget or appropriate any additional funding. This project budget is preliminary and additional work needs to be done to finalize the budget. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Phase II SilverRock Resort improvements include the installation of: the "backbone" infrastructure, including on -site streets, three (3) bridges spanning the Coachella Canal (one auto and two golf cart), water, sewer and dry utilities; the Permanent Clubhouse; the second Municipal Golf Course; the entry feature, and on - site landscaping. The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) is in the process of preparing plans for the Permanent Clubhouse at SilverRock Resort (SRR). The Clubhouse site and roadway locations have been set by the RDA, and at this time, staff is requesting comments on the site and floor plans. The RDA has retained Altevers Associates as the project architect ("Project Architect") and HSA Design Group as the project landscape architect ("Landscape Architect"). Both firms have had extensive experience in designing golf course clubhouses in the Coachella Valley including the recently completed Toscana Country Club in Indian Wells. In addition, the Project Architect has designed the clubhouse at PGA West, the Reserve, Stone Eagle, Thunderbird Country Club, Indian Ridge, and Mission Hills. Clubhouse Design Process The RDA is in the preliminary stages of site design, programming and budgeting for the Permanent Clubhouse. The RDA's Technical Team, in collaboration with the project architect, design consultants, and Landmark Golf ("Operator") have initiated a thorough process for evaluating the requirements of the RDA, and evolving the clubhouse design concept to the current draft which has been presented to the Planning Commission. The design history and development process which has resulted in the current clubhouse site and floor plans is as follows: The City Council approved the SRR Specific Plan on July 8, 2006. The Specific Plan Section 2.4 Master Plan Use, identifies Planning Area 1 as Golf Course Open Space, including a clubhouse site allocation of approximately seven acres located adjacent to the first tee boxes of the existing Arnold Palmer Classic course. The clubhouse site has since increased to t 11 acres in size as a result of the final road alignment of SilverRock Way being determined. The new alignment reallocates approximately four acres of golf course acreage to the clubhouse site. The clubhouse program identified in the Specific Plan proposed a total of 20,000 sq. ft. 042 e:. of clubhouse interior area on the main floor. The Specific Plan did not allocate square footage for the clubhouse lower level, or "cart barn." In March 2007, Golf Dimensions ("Project Manager") assisted the RDA's technical team in the research and development of a clubhouse program based on the Specific Plan requirements and the anticipated demands of the SilverRock project. Committee members in consultation with the Operator created a general outline and description of the primary functional areas typically found in a public golf clubhouse facility. In addition, technical team members toured similar public and private clubhouses in the Coachella Valley to gain insight into the various types of facilities and spatial allocations provided. As a result of this effort, the SilverRock Phase II Clubhouse Programming document was prepared (April 2007). This document summarized the RDA desired square footage allocations for the SilverRock Permanent Clubhouse. This clubhouse program included 19,942 sq. ft. of area on the main level, and 11,700 sq. ft. of area within the lower level, for a total of 31,642 sq. ft. The additional square footage added to the lower level was required to accommodate golf cart storage for two (2) golf courses. In April 2007, the Agency Board approved a contract with the project architect for the design of the Permanent Clubhouse facilities. Based on the clubhouse program developed by the RDA's technical team, in conjunction with the Operator, the project architect prepared three conceptual design iterations of the proposed clubhouse site and floor plans. Each design iteration was presented to the RDA's technical team and Operator, whose review comments and recommendations were compiled and forwarded to the project architect for consideration. The attached conceptual clubhouse floor plans were presented to the Planning Commission on September 25, 2007 and represented the project architect's interpretation of the RDA's program requirements, square footage allocations, and the input received from the RDA staff, and the Operator collectively. This design includes 20,790 sq. ft. of area on the main floor and 17,051 sq. ft. of area within the lower floor, for a total of 37,805 sq. ft. In the future, the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and Planning Commission, as well as the Agency Board, will review the clubhouse architectural plans and provide their comments and recommendations at the schematic design stage of plan development. In addition, the RDA Board will also review detailed budgets, design development, and construction documents. Clubhouse Design Considerations The site plan has been designed to be centrally located between the Arnold Palmer Classic Course and the second golf course. The site location and building orientation are intended to maximize views of the hillside and the existing Golf Course. The second golf course is intended to be a resort course and is yet to be designed. The following design objectives were established for the Clubhouse: • Maximize hillside views • Create indoor and outdoor event spaces • Accommodate 200-people within the building for events • Provide sufficient parking for golf and event functions • Create an inviting entry that features convenience for golfers and allows separate access for events • Facilitate golf cart staging and storage areas with sufficient area to accommodate two shotgun starts • Orientate the building and site improvements to protect the Clubhouse from the No. 1 tee • Design an outdoor event lawn which creates a unique outdoor activity space with sufficient screening (eight foot wall) from SilverRock Way • LEED Certification (Planning Commission recommendation) • Water efficient design (Planning Commission recommendation) The purpose of this item is for the Agency Board to review and comment on the proposed site plan and floor plan. Exhibits provided include a site plan, main level floor plan, and lower level floor plan. The main level floor area is 20,790 square feet and the lower level is 17,015 square feet. The total building area is 37,805 square feet. The site area has been increased from approximately seven acres to approximately 11 acres. The additional acreage is being re -allocated from the second resort golf course to the clubhouse. This shift in the site plan will not affect the ability to design a first class resort golf course. The project architect, technical team members and Operator are working on refinement of the lower level (cart barn), ingress and egress. It is expected that the next phase of plan development will include additional discussions on this part of the project. Clubhouse Preliminary Estimate of Cost The RDA established a budget for the design, entitlement and construction of the Permanent Clubhouse based on 37,000 square foot clubhouse. The budget approved in the Fiscal Year 2007-08 CIP is $25,412,010. The Project Manager has developed revised estimates of cost based on the current design, utilizing unit pricing provided by the project architect, and the clubhouse design team. This estimate is based on the August 27, 2007 project architect's plan and the cost is estimated to be $27,460,465. The project architect's contract includes a provision for increasing the design fees by $30.00 per square foot, should the final clubhouse design exceed 33,000 054 square feet of total gross enclosed area. The project architect's August 27, 2007, floor plan (37,805 sq. ft.) provides an additional 4,805 square feet over the 33,000 allocation, which will result in a fee increase of $144,150. This fee increase is reflected in the current clubhouse cost estimate. The current estimate of costs exceeds the RDA's original figures; however, the current plans reflect a site that has increased by approximately four acres, and by 805 sq. ft. of interior clubhouse area. Additionally, the construction cost of the building and interior furnishings have a five to ten percent cost increase due to the expected start of construction date. The proposed design features a large lake and new putting green. Based upon a comprehensive design program, the Agency Board will need to provide direction regarding the estimated cost. Cost Reduction Consideration Potential cost reducing considerations for the clubhouse site development, include the following: a) Re -allocate the costs associated with the clubhouse lake ($864,165) to the golf course budget. b) Re -allocate the cost associated with the clubhouse practice putting green ($95,040) to the golf course budget. c) Re -allocate costs associated with the transfer of approximately four acres ($1,412,449) from the golf course to the clubhouse site. Potential cost reducing considerations for the clubhouse program include the following: a) Reduce the overall square footage costs allocated to the clubhouse interior (value engineering). b) Reduce the overall square footage of the clubhouse interior by down-scoping the clubhouse program (elimination of clubhouse components, i.e., storage, locker rooms, general circulation). Clubhouse Development Schedule The clubhouse schedule of performance indicates an eight month period from the completion/approval of the programming and budget phase, to the start of the construction documents (which are shown beginning in March 2008), and completion scheduled for September 2008 (when these plans are to be publicly bid). Construction of the clubhouse is scheduled to begin December 2008, and project completion/acceptance scheduled for December 2009. or Architecture and Landscape Review Commission Action On September 5, 2007, the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee reviewed the conceptual drawings. Committee members asked questions regarding drainage, how the new CVWD landscape ordinance would affect the site, the budget to maintain the course, and if the island design could be more concave and not mounded to keep it out of the street. Following discussion, it was unanimously determined to approve the conceptual drawings as submitted. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission, at its September 25, 2007 meeting, reviewed the subject plans and exhibits. Commissioner discussion focused on the site plan, energy conservation and water conservation. Commission members expressed very positive comments regarding the site plan and overall design direction while asking questions about the proposed lake, layout of the floor plan, and site orientation. Following discussion, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary drawings subject to adding water and energy conservation measures to the project objectives outlined in this report. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the Agency Board include: 1. Provide staff with direction regarding the Permanent Clubhouse program development and budget; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Dou las R vans Assistant City Manager -Development Services A- 056 Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director Attachments: 1. Overall Master Plan 2. Clubhouse Site Plan — August 27, 2007 3. Clubhouse Main Floor Plan — August 27, 2007 4. Clubhouse Lower Level Floor Plan — August 27, 2007 5. Clubhouse Preliminary Estimate of Cost — 9/24/07 6. Clubhouse Preliminary Programming Exhibit •_, 057 )59 9 ATTACHMENT 5 SILVERROCK RESORT- Phase 2 CLUBHOUSE COST ESTIMATE DIRECT COST Description city Unit Rate Total Budget Comments AREAS Site(gross ac. 10.23 ac 445,551 s.f. Building 65,135 s.f. Main Level 20790 s.f. Lower Level 17 015 s.f. Ancillary Exterior 27 330 s f Building Footprint 36382 a Lake 57611 s(. Practice Green 6.336 s.f. SITE 409169 31 6 12.66 9 5178980 Rough & Precise Grading 1 I.S. 700,000 700,000 Lake 57611 af. 15.00 864,165 Practice Green 6,33 a f 15.00 95,040 Evert Lawn 7,824 af. 5.00 39,120 Event Lawn Screen Wall 190 I.f. 150.00 28.500 Event Lawn Gazebo/Trellis 1 Is 50,000 50,000 Allowance Service Yard 5,679 s.f. 7.39 41,948 Includes CMU Fence $15011 f & Gale 61,500 Entry Court and Enhanced Paving Sidewalk 3,274 s.f. 20.00 65,480 Entry Courtyard Drive Enhanced Paving 13.18 s.f. 20.00 263,640 ,Entry Courtyard Screen Walls 95 if. 150.00 14,250 Golf Cart Staging/Cart Parkin Ram 20.237 s.f. 2.50 50,593 Golf Cad Staging Enhanced Paving 2.492 s f 20.00 49,840 Parking Lot AC Paving 74.736 a 2.50 186,840 Landsca a/Irti ation 208,238 s.f. 800 1.665.904 Flahvork 9,560 s.f. 4.00 38.240 Storm Chain, Sewer, Electrical, Gas, CAN 1 Is. 675,000 675,000 Courtyard Water Feature 1 I.S. 50,000 50,000 Curb&Gutter 4,991 Lf. 18.00 89838 Curb 3,886 If 1400 54404 She Lighting 208238 s.f. 075 156,179 BUILDING 37806 s.f. $ 453.85 9 17,157,920 Main Level 20,790 31 450.00 9,355,500 Lower Level 17015 s.f. 450.00 7,656,750 Exterior Uncovered Areas - Pavino 2.487 s.f. 20.00 49,740 Retaining Walls W hi h 397 I.f. 150.00 59,550 Rams 733 s 1 20.00 14,660 Planters 1,810 s.f. 12.00 21,720 Total Direct Cost $ 22,336,900 INDIRECT COST Description Oty Unit Rate Total Budget Comments CONSULTANTS $ 2765235 Golf Dimensions 1 Is. 687.874 687874 Altevers Associates 1,389,000 Architectural 1 I.e. 689,000 689,000 Structural 1 I.S. 118,000 118,000 MEP 1 Is. 133,000 133,000 Food Service 1 I S 26,000 20,000 Acoustic Consultant 1 Is Inc/ Pro Shop Consultant 1 Is, 6000 6000 Hardware Consultant 1 I.S. Incl Cost Estimating Consultant 1 I.S. 30,000 30,000 Rendering 2 1 I.S. 7,500 7,500 Scale Model 1 I.S. 17,000 17000 As-bui0 Plans 1 I.B. 4,500 4,500 Interior Design 1 I.B. 179,000 179,000 Reimbursable Expenses i I.S. 45000 45.000 Addendum No.1 1 Is. 140,000 140,00 Estimate (4,805 s.f $30/s f RBF Consulting 142 659 Ste Plan Calculations t I.s. 8,000 8,000 Parkin Lot Layout 1 I.s. 5,500 5,500 Precise Grading Plans 1 11 I.S. 1 36,5001 36,500 2:14 PM 92Q 007 062 SILVERROCK RESORT - Phase 2 CLUBHOUSE COST ESTIMATE INDIRECT COST Description Qty Unit Rate Total Budget Comments Horizontal Control Plan t Is, 2,500 2,500 Private Utility Plan 1 Ls 5,000 5,000 Dry Utility Plan 1 I.S. 9,000 9,000 Parking Lot Lighting Plan 1 Ls. 12,500 12,500 Creek Crossing 1 le. 9,300 9,300 Bid Packa e & Bidding Assistance 1 le. 6,000 6,000 Project M mt Coordination & QA/QC 1 Is 14,400 14,400 Construction Support 1 Is. 6,500 6,500 Clubhouse Rough Grading Stakes 1 I.e. 12,5001 12,500 Building Location Stakes 1 I.S. 8,500 8,500 Clubhouse Building Form Ven ication 1 I.S. 3,500 3,500 Reimbursable Expenses 1 I.S. 2,959 2959 HSA 1 Is. 203,385 203,386 Landscape Architecture incl Irrigation Design and Lighting Design Concept incl Reimbursable Expenses incl Aquatic Design Group i I.S. 35,917 35,917 Lake Design and Field Services incl Reimbursable Expenses incl Other Consultants 306,400 Geotechnwal Engineering 1 I.S. 44.000 44,000 Estimate Waterproofing consultant 1 I.S. 18,000 18,000 Estimate Lighting Consultant 1 I.S. 12,000 12.000 Estimate Archeol ist/Palecntolcist 1 I.S. 50,000 50,000 Estimate LEED Consultant i I.S. 182,400 182,400 PERMIT & FEES $ Plan Check & Permit Fees 1 Is 0 9 School Fees 1 I.S. 0 S MIti ation Fees i I.a. 0 S Development Impact Fees 1 I.a. 0 $ - Not Applicable Transportation Fees 1 la. 0 $ Grading Plan Check & Permit 1 Is. 0 $ CVWD Sewer Connection Fee 1 Is, 0 $ CVWD Water Connection Fee 1 Is 0 $ Misc. En in aring & Landscape Fees 1 Is 0 $ Fire Authority 1 Is 0 $ OTHER $ 21358,330 Mat. Testing & Insp 75,000 Estimate SI na e I I.S. 0 0 Reprographics 1 Is. 0 0 FF&E 1 Is. 2,105.300 2,106,300 Altevers' estimate Furniture, carpet, wall coverings, window treatments, incl decrotive lighting, artwork, aocessories, int. si na e, plants, ash and trash,containers, freight, warehousing, installation, 12% purchase fee China flatwareglassware, small wares kitchen incl Allevers' estimate utensils, menus linens utildy shelving, trash handling equipment. engineers office equipment, Dart storage. washer/dryer, cartwasher, ice machine, once, biz storage mcks club repair accessories employee lounge equipment and fur hum, POS/AV equipment, telephone system, chefs office equipment, banquet operations equipment and accessories, computers, rioters valet equipment. FF&E 2008 Increase 1 1 s 178.030 178030 Ahevers' estimate Art In Public Places 1 I.s. 0 0 Total Indirect Cost I S 5123565 Total Direct & Indirect Cost I I I I S 27460405 214 PM 9/24/2007 A.. 063 Z u K E C z y i IA W Y cn H N E m O �C o' E c O. W 0 Y' E W W C N v E m s 0 vwi o = 00 t p c J 0 �n y '^ N O Z 3� p m._ 0 a o -0 v N_ w O OlO =N °w_ o v Ear o '—� o � c v = Qw = v E = ca 00 O rT = cr C w (I �m _ ° ro m m�LDS c m� 3��C��m� in t0 0 v° N C Ln y n Ln O = O 000 O 0) o 0) in M in in N N O Vt M Vt M N 0) N O O, to O M Ln CO1 10 N N V m M Q �t a 00 I(1 N N V M .- N .- N 00 V ry� l0 I� C 01 O t tl H A 0 IO 0 l O a- ^ O N W% O O O N rn a d ' W LU Q Cl Y O l7'C l7 l7 E O IN Ln a :o o Ln LM n a c d d Z �- N CJ N M 'O O 'O 'O _ � _ g _ ^ V C C C 0 Z O O O Ln O O O C O O tD O C O C .% C O 00 a - •;i v O 0 0 o c C a 0O a N a 4 o E r o C E a N m O a v w o°e O O C a0+ VI E O L 0 C w O O CC J O m �N O IA IA COC 01 0m J E r w w Y W C U m t10 W Q W :7 J d l7 J,- C 064 w rn w m VI C n Ul N p O1 N . N w VI 2 'O w `. O z a km �7p V 'IS����s�i v �' °r° '^ mho t' E C d cm \ w u �o V n. M V W M m V cv L VI i Ln N O O O v1 VI 0000 Q O fi VI O O O Vt V1 VI O O O O p Ln O 0 0 lfl ^ V1 Ln M �o N 00 ph � 01 n , I� Ln e- m �o N 1, O e- M , Lo N 0 r+i N eT Z 1g Q M N .- e- 00 00 N � Mto M eN- O 0�0 Ia M f;�tV�lf: un VI M VI P Vf N V ^ ui M t 7. �L fii y N W NVN 1 N NC O p 0 Ln O N M�wpN V O0 fV c G G C M V Loll O p Q N a Q N ,4 �f,n: w -0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 w m w v O N N 7� O O O O O O O 7 O V VI M m N m N V V n l0 O O ••ICIij '• K O+ 'j F Z �.0 i v 0 v w vt w Im 0+ '4Ti R ° \ V Im 2 J O �iil -� O N 0w7 C E O J w O Q, r a w w zm Q w w a a A w E N U m m �• a 3 E m ` c w o+ZM r; _ J Y V V V w 0 .W. w w V^ C F- V K 1`0 V LLJ w C 0 OC H :0 E w i N :0 V V C 0 w� LL O F- C w i v_ fao O 0 L C w Y w ` L 1A O w V il' iVI wd •' 7 w w w A A w a+ t6 w w •' O O w `�- SL LL l7 2 �f '�� : VI V U OC 0 m V V' S 0 W O a 065 / 7 \ 2 �t}7. 7E .2.e_�_§§a■ §e;|@=�Ln o=0a-wC±� ik.m, rstet ' W=a^�2JU /�` LL \ � Ln ƒ\L �j\2 ~�~$ $ / $ $ \ k / ƒ q $ LL / Ln \ \( $ /aoa 8 ° 8ss(N $5Ln § § ��Rf ƒ ƒ \ � /� ± L y \/ /\�0 �0LLJ / 'tom E# k CL§ W k j` e /=o� CL \ I iA - et /) a k ) k 2 2 066