Loading...
10-1402 (RPL)P.O. BOX 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Application Number: Property Address: APN: Application description: Property Zoning: Application valuation: Applicant: 10--00001402- 51030 AVENIDA CARRANZA 773-061-026- - POOL - RESIDENTIAL COVE RESIDENTIAL 14000 Tdtt 4 4a Q" Architect or Engineer: BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT BUILDING PERMIT LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that 1 am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professionals Code, and my License is in full force and effect. License Class: License No.: Date: ontractor: OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractor's State License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031 .5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county that requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for the permit to file a signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's State License Law (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he or she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any?Pplicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars (55001.: ( 1, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors' State License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does the work himself or herself through his or her own employees, provided that the improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he or she did not build or improve for the purpose of safe.). 1 _ 1 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors' State License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for the projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractors' State License Law.). (_) I am exempt under Sec. , B.&P.C. for this reason 01 4 Date: J 1 Owner: CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ. C.). . Lender's Name: Lender's Address: LQPERMIT Owner: WISSMAN DALE & LYNDA NAMIKAWA 51030 AVENIDA CARRANZA LA QUINTA, CA 92253 -------------------- ��- D. Contractor: Owner i ------------------ ------ VOICE (760) 777-7012 FAX (760) 777-7011 INSPECTIONS (760) 777-7153 Date: 12/23/10 U f'� 1 o 2i1 T I Lgi u WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Carrier Policy Number VJ certify that, in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and agree that, if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section / 3700 of the Labor (C)e,I sy/h/edol forth wN/)'.th�cLom�ply..with �those provisions.. >� ete: Pelican[:/�W •'tieZ'/'!� — WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000). IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES. APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IMPORTANT Application is hereby made to the Director of Building and Safety for a permit subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth on this application. 1 . Each person upon whose behalf this application is made, each person at whose request and for whose benefit -work is performed under or pursuant to any permit issued as a result of this application, the owner, and the applicant, each agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta,'its officers, agents and employees for any act or omission related to the work being performed under or following issuance of this permit. - 2. Any permit issued as a result of this application becomes null and void if work is not commenced within 180 days from date of issuance of such permit, or cessation of work for 180 days will subject permit to cancellation. I certify that 1 have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all cityand county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this'cou�rr7ty [o a ter upo eabove-mentioned property for i pec n urpoces. Date:' / Signature (Applicant or Agent): Application Number . . . . . 10-00001402 Permit . . . . . . ELEC POOL PERMIT -RES Additional desc . Permit Fee . . . . 45.00 Plan Check Fee 11.25 Issue Date . . . . Valuation . . . . 0 Expiration Date 6/21/11 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension BASE FEE 15.00 1.00 30.0000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- EA ELEC PRIVATE SWIMMING POOL 30.00 Permit . . . BLDG POOL PERMIT Additional desc . Permit Fee 153.00 Plan Check Fee 99.45 Issue Date Valuation 14000 Expiration Date 6/21/11 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension BASE FEE 45.00 12.00 9.0000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- THOU BLDG 2,001-25,000 108.00 Permit . . . PLUMBING Additional desc . . Permit Fee . . . . 27.00 Plan Check Fee 6.75 Issue Date . . . . Valuation . . . . 0 Expiration Date 6/21/11 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension BASE FEE 15.00 1.00 6.0000 EA PLB FIXTURE 6.00' 1.00* 3.0000 EA PLB WATER INST/ALT/REP 3.00 1.00 3.0000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- EA PLB GAS PIPE 1-4 OUTLETS 3.00 Permit . . . WALL/FENCE PERMIT Additional desc . . Permit Fee 15.00 Plan .Check Fee .00 Issue Date Valuation . . . . 144 Expiration Date'. 6/21/11 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension BASE FEE 15.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Special Notes and Comments 10-X601POOL, 9 L.F. 3.5' BLOCK WALL, CITY STANDARD, PER APPROVED PLANS. LQPERA4IT Application Number . . . . 10-00001402 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Special Notes and Comments ALARMS/BARRIERS SHALL BE IN PLACE AT PRE -PLASTER INSPECTION. 2007/2008 CODES. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Fees . . . . . . . . . BLDG STDS ADMIN (SB1473) 1.00 Fee summary Charged Permit Fee Total 240.00 Plan Check Total 117.45 Other Fee Total 1.00 Grand Total 358.45 LQPERMIT Paid Credited Due .00 .00 240.00 .00 .00 117.45 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 358.45 TO: FROM DATE: RE: ��w4�rw M E M O R A N D U M Dale Wissman Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager January 7,2011 Swimming Pool Approval —.51030 Avenida Carranza On the advice of City Attorney M. Katherine Jenson, the Building & Safety Department hereby approves your application to construct a gunite swimming pool within the vacated portion of the former Calle Tampico that is now a part of your property at the above address (APN: 773-061-026), subject to the following conditions: 1. By issuing the building permit, the City of La Quinta does not negate or modify any easement rights belonging to CVWD, nor any property rights belonging.to you. 2. Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) indicates that its water line exists parallel to and approximately seven feet south of your north property line and "typically requires a 20' easement (10 feet on. each side) for a single pipeline."' 3. You may construct a pool as generally indicated on your approved drawings, but in no case closer than ten feet from the field verified location of the existing eight -inch water pipeline. 4. Should CVWD require access for repair or maintenance of its water line, you accept responsibility for allowing and coordinating their access. 5. The City of La Quinta accepts no responsibility for any costs to repair or replace your property perimeter wall(§), if damaged or destroyed as a result of CVWD activities. Your acceptance of these conditions is indicated by your purchase of building permit #10-1402 and construction of the subject swimming pool. . ' As stated in "Calle Tampico -Response to Wissman-MLJ 11-8-10.doc," attached to an e-mail dated November. 16, 2010 from Joseph Larsen of Rutan & Tucker, LLP, to Kathy Jenson and Greg Butler. Date: 11/16/10 CVWD response to inquiry from City of La Quinta re Wissman letter dated 10/2/10 The District installed an 8" water pipeline in 1993 in the public right of way of Calle Tampico in the City of La Quinta. It is located approximately 7 feet south of the centerline of that vacated street. After construction of the pipeline, on February 1, 1994, the City of La Quinta by formal resolution, vacated the right of way reserving as required by state law an easement for the District's pipeline. Dale Wissman, subsequently purchased the property at 51-030 Avenida Carranza, which includes that 30 foot portion south of the centerline of the vacated Calle Tampico. His deed specifically mentions the resolution. Mr. Wissman then installed a block wall around the perimeter of the property and has stated that the wall was required by the City of La Quinta. The 8" water pipeline is 7 feet south and parallels the block wall located along the vacated centerline of Calle Tampico on the north side of 51-030 Avenida Carranza. In addition, the block wall on the east and west property lines crosses'above the 8" water line. This creates two interference issues for the District. First, the 8" water line within 51-030 Avenida Carranza would only be accessible in the event of an emergency by removing a portion of the block wall. Second, the District typically requires a 20' easement (10 feet on each side) for a single pipeline for reasonable access and in this case the District would have difficulty making repairs because of the proximity (7 feet) of the water line to the existing block wall. Now Mr. Wissman wishes to construct a pool within the 30 foot area gained by the vacation of Calle Tampico. This would create yet a third interference as the construction of a pool in this area would further impinge on the Districts ability to access the 8" water line. This will unreasonably interfere with the District's pre-existing reasonable use of the easement. Under these circumstances, the District believes that Mr. Wissman's proposed pool project should not be approved by the City of La Quinta. A viable alternative is to relocate the water line outside of 51-030 Avenida Carranza but not at District cost. TdY 4 4 Q191446i P.O. Box 1504 LA QUINTA; CALIFORNIA 92247-1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT PROPERTY OWNER'S PACKAGE (7 60) 777-7012 FAX (760) 777-7011 Disclosures & Forms for Owner -Builders Applying for Construction Permits IMPORTANT! NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER Dear Property Owner: An application for a building ermit has been submi ed in our name listing yourself s the builder ofqnroTerty improvements specified at �,3 D y l � � We are providing you with an Owner -Builder Acknowledgment and Information erification Form t�,o make youof your responsibilities and possible risk you may incur by having this permit issued in your name as the Owner -Builder. We hill not issue a building permit until you have read, initialed your understanding of each provision, signed, and returned this form to us at our official address indicated. An agent of the owner cannot execute this notice unless you, the property owner, obtain the prior approval of the permitting authority. OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION DIRECTIONS: Read and initial each statement below to signify you understand or verify this information. PO1. I understand a frequent practice of unlicensed persons is to have the property owner obtain an "Owner -Builder" building permit that erroneously implies that the property owner is providing his or her own labor and material personally. I, as an Owner -Builder, may be held liable and subject to serious financial risk for any injuries sustained by an unlicensed person and his or her employees while working on my property. My homeowner's insurance may not provide coverage for those injuries. I am willfully acting as an Owner -Builder and am aware of the limits of my insurance coverage for injuries to workers on my property. /0 2. I understand building permits are not required to be signed by property owners unless they are responsible for the construction and are not hiring a licensed Contractor to assume this responsibility. DIJ 3. I understand as an "Owner -Builder" I am the responsible party of record on the permit. I understand that I may protect myself from potential financial risk by hiring a licensed Contractor and having the permit filed in his or her name instead of my own. fid4. I understand Contractors are required by law to be licensed and bonded in California and to list their license numbers on permits and contracts. e&5. v 5. I understand if I employ or otherwise engage any persons, other than California licensed Contractors, and the total value of my construction is at. least five hundred dollars ($500), including labor and materials, I may be considered an "employer" under state and federal law. 01--) 6. 1 understand if I am considered an "employer" under state and federal law, I must register with the state and federal government, withhold payroll taxes, provide workers'. compensation disability insurance, and contribute to unemployment compensation for each "employee." I also understand my failure to abide by these laws may subject me to serious financial /risk.. 7. 1 understand under California Contractors' State License Law, an Owner -Builder who builds single-family residential structures cannot legally build them with the intent to offer them for sale, unless all work is performed by licensed subcontractors and the number of structures does not exceed four within any calendar year, or all of the work is performed under contract with a licensed general building Contractor. 004-8. I understand as an Owner -Builder if I sell the property for which this permit is issued, I may be held liable for any financial or personal injuries sustained by any subsequent owner(s) that result from any latent construction defects in the ,workmanship or materials. /0 9. I understand I may obtain more information regarding my obligations as an "employer" from the Internal Revenue Service, the United States Small Business Administration, the California Department of Benefit Payments, and the California Division of Industrial Accidents. I also understand I may contact the California Contractors' State License Board (CSLB) at I- 800-321 - 80_`0-321-CSLB (2752) or www.cslb.ca.gov for more information about licensed contractors. X / �"' 10. I am aware of and consent to an Owner -Builder building permit applied for in my name, and understand that I am the party legally and financially responsible for proposed construction activity at the following address: I agree that, as the party legally and financially responsible for this proposed construction activity, I will abide by all � applicable laws and requirements that govern Owner -Builders as well as employers. ij '° J 12. I agree to notify the issuer of this form immediately of any additions, deletions, or changes to any of the information I have provided on this form. Licensed contractors are regulated by laws designed to protect the public. If you contract with someone who does not have a license, the Contractors' State License Board may be unable to assist you with any financial loss you may sustain as a result of a complaint. Your only remedy against unlicensed Contractors may be in civil court- It is also important for you to understand that if an unlicensed Contractor or employee of that individual or firm is injured while working on your property; you may be held liable for damages. If you obtain a permit as Owner -Builder and wish to hire Contractors, you will be responsible for verifying whether or not those Contractors are properly licensed and the status of their workers' compensation insurance coverage. Before a building permit can be issued, this form must be completed and signed by the property owner and returned to the agency responsible for issuing the permit. Note: A copy of the property owner's driver's license; form notarization, or other verification acceptable to the agency is required to be presented when the permit is issued to verify the property owner's signature. Signature of property owner 6414"P� Dater Note: The following Authorization Form is required to be completed by the property owner only when designating an agent of the property owner to apply for a construction permit for the Owner -Builder. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT TO ACT ON PROPERTY OWNER'S BEHALF Excluding the Notice to Property Owner, the execution of which I understand. is my personal responsibility, I hereby authorize the following person(s) to act as, my agent(s) to apply for, sign, and file the documents necessary to obtain an Owner -Builder_ Permit for my project. Scope of Construction Project (or Description of Work): Project Location or Address Name of Authorized Agent: Tel No Address of Authorized Agent: I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the property owner for the address listed above and I personally filled out the above information and certify its accuracy. Note: A copy of the owner's driver's license, form notarization, or other verification acceptable to the agency is required to be presented when the permit is issued to verify the property owner's signature. Property Owner's Signature: 4�� /� Date: �V DALE WISSMAN 51-030 AVENIDA CARRANZA LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92262 (760) 799-8670 Greg Butler Building and Safety Manager City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247 Dear Mr. Butler, RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2010 BY:4-0� This letter is in response to your Plan Check Correction List of March 8, 2010. After many months of work, and multiple attempts to fulfill the terms of the Plan Check Correction List, I can state emphatically that it is impossible to meet the City of La Quinta's demand for corrections to my submittal of plans for a residential pool at my home (51-030 Avenida Carranza). You may recall that the Plan Check Correction List concerned one major item as follows: "1. Provide a site plan, prepared by a civil engineer or surveyor, licensed to practice in the State of California, showing the location of existing and proposed structures, property lines, and all easements for review. This will be used to verify that the pool is proposed in an allowable location." [Bold from original text]. . In speaking with two surveyors/civil engineers, there is simply no way for me, as a home owner, to garner a site plan whereby a surveyor/civil engineer would sign off on any determination of an easement ostensibly held, but not defined or enumerated in any way by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). That is because, as of yet, CVWD has refused to define the easement surrounding an 8" recirculation water pipe buried approximately 6' from the north property line facing the Bear Creek Path. In addition, the City of La Quinta has never attempted to clarify with CVWD the easement held by CVWD, but which was granted due to the city's own resolution. If it had, there would be no need for a correction list demanding of a homeowner details relating to the easement. On or about May 3, 1994, the City of La Quinta passed Resolution 94-13, which apparently rescinded a previous Board resolution, in order to grant to CVWD an easement stating in relevant part as follows: "However, a reservation of an easement from the proposed vacation for any existing public utilities or public service facilities is needed in order to protect such facilities and provide for their continuing use and maintenance. " (from Part 3, page 2) Putting aside whether or not Resolution -94-13 was properly filed at the time, the city's resolution does not itself define the easement. Greg Butler October 27, 2010 Page 2 If the City's own resolution does not define the easement, and CVWD has itself refused to define the easement, then it is impossible for a surveyor/civil engineer, much less the homeowner, to determine the easement. Simply put, it is impossible to comply with the terms of your March 8, 2010 Plan Check Correction List. That is because the City of La Quinta and CVWD have, perhaps inadvertently, constructed a classic "Catch-22" that cannot be resolved by demanding that a homeowner clarify an easement filed by the City of La Quinta in 1994 and held by CVWD since. What is clear is that as a homeowner I have the right to reasonable develop on the property I own. CVWD does not own my land. It is in both the homeowners' interest and in the City of La Quinta's interest to work together and demand, at the minimum, that CVWD clarify exactly what they claim their easement is. At this time, I believe that the City of La Quinta, and the other eight homeowners/lot owners with the exact same problem, all have a vested interest in working together to consider possible solutions to the problems associated with a hidden, underground waterline running through nine backyards. Here's a few possible avenues: 1. The City of La Quinta could take the time to call CVWD and demand they provide a clear cut answer to exactly the easement they are claiming. This has not been done. 2. The City of La Quinta could ne otiate with CVWD to determine the reasonable easement for homeowners., especially in light of conflicting requirements, such as the city's municipal code. This has not been done. 3. If CVWD continues to be obstinate and ignore the problem, the City of La Quinta could We a new Board Resolution stating specifically the easement granted to CVWD, in light of CVWD's flat refusal to provide exact details as to the claimed extent of the easement. To my knowledge, this has never been considered. 4. The. City of La Quinta could begin working with CVWD and the homeowners/lot owners to move the waterline ata reasonable cost to all, so that development may continue and all future litigation over this issue ceases. This has never been seriously pursued, although most homeowners, and perhaps even a majority on the City Council, would support such a plan in my opinion, (especially if moving the water line ultimately proves cheaper than litigation over the same water line). Greg Butler October 27, 2010 Page 3 In fact, it's probably just cheaper to simply move the waterline. Certainly, the future costs of litigation to CVWD, the City of La Quinta, and the homeowners in the next 20 years, all on the exact same issue, will prove more expensive than the actual construction project.' The City of La Quinta and CVWD have already spent an enormous amount of time and money defending itself against one homeowner.in Casarez v. City of La Quinta (CVWD/Commonwealth Title). If CVWD refuses to clarify the easement, the matter would certainly end up in court in order to bring clarity to the matter, especially as it relates to CVWD's easement. I believe that the City of La Quinta's liability, if any, can be limited or eliminated simply by taking action on behalf of homeowners in the area. Please note that I am not asking for any monetary damages, and I certainly don't want to be engaged in conflict with the City of La Quinta. Instead, I am asking that the City of La Quinta take positive, aggressive action to once and for all clarify, with or without CVWD's assistance, the city's own Board Resolution granting CVWD the easement so that homeowners and future developers know what can and can't be built on the property originally vacated by the City of La Quinta in 1994. Certainly, confusion reigns among homeowners. Ms. Casarez, and myself have both been denied permits to build pools and guest houses at one point by the city. However, another homeowner in the exact same situation at 51-065 Avenida Vallejo was issued a permit by the city to construct a pool, within, the easement CVWD is claiming, and did so. This is no small matter; it has added to the confusion and anger among homeowners, myself included, concerning the above stated issues. As you no doubt are aware, the city has taken no action to clarify or otherwise demand of CVWD a definitive, reasonable easement based on the city's own Resolution 94-13. Instead, the City of La Quinta's Building Department has taken the opposite tack in demanding of me, the homeowner, a determination as to the easement held by CVWD, which was originally granted to CVWD by the city's own Resolution 94-13. This is an unreasonable request in the extreme. I understand that, as per the Plan Check Correction List of March 8, 2010, the city may deny me a permit to build a pool. If that happens, as I expect it will, please consider this I Ironically, CVWD made a field decision in 1994 not to move the waterline nto the utility area and out of the vacated area as originally planned. In fact, it was CV WD's on-site, spur-of-the-moment change that necessitated the City of La Quinta's filing of a second, amended Board Resolution 94-13 to grant an easement to CVWD after the botched construction project. The entire purpose of abandoning the original 4" recirculation line in 1994 and installing an 8" line to the north was to head off any future development problems in the vacated area (and to replace the older, smaller line at the same time). Greg Butler October 27, 201.0 Page 4 letter my standing request to appeal such decision as per La Quinta Municipal Code 8.01.030(B) to the La Quinta Board of Appeals. In searching the city's website, 1 find no form that may be used in order to appeal a decision of the building and safety department. If there is such a form, please provide it to me at time the city denies me a permit to construct a pool at my home. If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to call me ( Thank ou for your aEtention to this matter, Dale Wissman, Owner 51-030 Avenida Carranza Page 1 of 1 Greg Butler From: Dale Wissman [wissmandale@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:29 AM To: Greg Butler Subject: Pool Permits 51-030 Avenida Carranza - Wissman Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Greg, I haven't heard back from the City of La Quinta on the pool permit issue. You haven't: yet denied the permit, so I've assumed that perhaps the issue isn't dead with the City of La Quinta as of yet. I haven't heard back from you, and I wanted to get an update from you. My cell phone number is below. Dale Wissman 760.799-8670 cell 12/21/2010 .CITY OF LA QUINTA SUB-CONTR OR�-IST JOB ADDRESS 0 � l�a � (PERMIT NUMBER 10-1402 OWNER q�C wiS�Sr %% BUILDER This form shall be posted on the job with the BufldiIng Inspection Card at all times in a conspicuous 13x16: Only persons appearing on this list or their employees are authorized to work on this job. Any changes to tPis list must be approved by the Building Division prior to commencement of work. Failure to comply will result in a stoppage of work and/or the voidance of building permit. For each applicable trade,. all information requested below must be completed by applicant. "OnTile" is not an acceptable response. .......tom .... ..:::::..:.,..;.:::::::.. rt; .. Mniii:!;.:iii:4 iCortipany Name Classiticadon License Number Exp. Date Carrier Name Policy NumberExp. Date ' License Number Exp. Date (e.g. A, 8, C-8) (xxxxxx) hPc M60 (e.g.. State Fund. CalComp) (Format Varies) (xxlxx/xx) (xxxx) (xx/xx/xx) ✓ 'MINIINEEINEIN®■ l:�l.� � �I ®■ r e ®■ i , r SEIN_ _■ INE MINNIE 0101 _: •NEI �, -�■ a. ;� ?; /INEE INE ® FIE!i . . . s ■min s MIN! ■ �■ �■■■ INEE INE 1001 ✓ 'MINIINEEINEIN®■ l:�l.� � �I ®■ r e ®■ i , r SEIN_ _■ Bin # Permit #'a project Address: C/--n 0n City of La Quinta Mding a Safety Division . P.O. Box 1504, 78-49S Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 - (760) 777-7012 Building Permit Application and Tracking Sheet � A Owner's Name: 1 �/%ZScr✓7 A. P. Number: 6 ��V Address: 5-1-0 30*M(44 6zMc Legal Description: (/,? City, ST, Zip: /-,,Lu rig el-7 Contractor: owkl &' 06C( e �l S� Telephone: Project Description: Address: 5(-03d&etar4 City. ST, Zip: " Telephone: State Lie. #: City Lia C /�* �c./ --��-- //�� Arch., Engr.. Designer. l/v h ffQ/l WA Address: s: V 1 Uu1 CGir, / Fu,./�� City, ST. Zip: /n&6 Telephone: ?M. Rw Olj .State Lie. #: Name of Contact Person: Construction Type: icy: Project type (circle one): New Add'n Alter Repair Demo # Stogy: # Units: Telephone # of Contact Person: Value of Project: APPLICANT: DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS UNE # Submittal Plan Sets Req'd Recd TRACKING PERMIT FEES Plan Check submitted Item Amount Structural Cales. Reviewed, ready for corrections p Plan Check Deposit Truss Cala. Called Contact Person Plan Check Balance Title 24 Cales. Plans picked up Construction Flood plain plan Plans resubmitted Mechanical Grading plan 2'! Review, ready for correctionsAnue Electrical Subeouactor List Called Contact Person Plumbing Grant Deed Pans picked op S.M.L H.O.A. Approval Plans resubmitted Grading IN HOUSE:- Review, ready for correctionvIssue Developer Impact Fee Planning Approval Called Contact Person A.LP.P. Pub. Wks. Appr Date of permit issue School Fees Total Permit Fees Page 1 of 1 Greg Butler From: Larsen, Joseph glarsen@rutan.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:20 PM To: Greg Butler; Jenson, Kathy Subject: FW: CVWD response to 10.27.10 letter of Dale Wissman Attachments: Calle Tampico -Response to Wissman-MLJ 11-8-10.doc Kathy & Greg, Attached is the water District's response to Dale Wissman's 10/27/10 letter. According to their response, they typically require a 20 foot easement. Here, the pipeline is located approximately 7 feet from the centerline of the vacated street. That would mean that they require the northerly 17 feet of the property for purposes of maintaining their pipeline. The problem is, the northerly 17 feet required by the district would include 2 feet of Wissman's property that was not within the vacated street. Clearly, those 2 feet cannot be within the easement. As such, the most they can claim is the northerly 15 feet -- which is, I believe, the entire area obtained by the property owner upon the vacation of the street. Joseph Larsen Rutan & Tucker, LLP 611 Anton Boulevard, 14th Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 641-3418 direct 714-546-9035 Fax jlarsen@rutan.com www.rutan.com Any tax advice contained in the body of this e-mail (and any attachments thereto) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions. Privileged And Confidential Communication. This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC §§ 2510- 2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information, and (c) are for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copylng, distribution, or use of the contents of the information received in error is strictly prohibited. `,- Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: Harry Carpelan [mailto:hcarpelan@redwineandsherrill.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 1:55 PM To: Larsen, Joseph Cc: 'Dale Wissman' Subject: CVWD response to 10.27.10 letter of Dale Wissman Attached is the District's response to Mr. Wissman's letter to the City which you forwarded to me for comment. Very truly yours, Harry. Carpelan, Redwine and Sherrill, 951-684-2520 12/21/2010 p LLuv Z Established in 1918 as a public agency 1 r Coachella Valley Water District `�''` �U l IPOlt3�ND BAiV Directors: Officers: Patricia A. Larson, President Steven B. Robbins, General Manager -Chief Engineer Peter Nelson, Vice President Julia Fernandez, Board Secretary Tellis Codekas Franz W. De Klotz April 23, 2010 Redwine and Sherrill, Attorneys Russell Kitahara File: 0426.0908.5 0652.21 Dale and Lynda Wissman 51-030 Avenida Carranza La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Wissman.: Subject: Assessor's Parcel Number 773-061-026, 51-030 Avenida Carranza, La Quinta The Coachella Valley Water District (District) received your emailed request.and design plans to construct a pool and associated improvements within the District's domestic water pipeline easement at your property, 51-030 Avenida Carranza in La Quinta. The District holds a valid easement for its water pipelines per City of La Quinta Resolution Number 94=13, recorded on May 3, 1994 as Instrument No. 182057 as previously stated in our June 3, 2009 letter, copy enclosed. We are unable to approve your proposed improvements. Per District policy, no permanent improvements, including pools, may lie within our easements as permanent improvements unreasonably interfere with our easement rights and ability to operate and maintain our facilities. If any permanent improvements are installed within our easement at your property known as 51-030 Avenida Carranza, the District will pursue appropriate steps to protect our easement rights. ifThe District is currently engaged in a legal proceeding regarding this easement. If you would like additional information regarding the District's rights in this matter, please contact our legal counsel, Redwine & Sherrill, Mr. Harry Carpelan at ( Yours very truly, /s/ Mark L. Johnson Mark L. Johnson Enclosure/l/as Director of Engineering cc: Harry Carpelan, Riverside (without enclosure) City of La Quinta without enclosure Gerald F,agans, Riverside (without enclosure) CM:pr/enghw/10/apr/Dale Wissman-Avenida Cam= 060601-4 FILE . ATER r POOL BOND BEAM #4 REBAR 18" LONG © 12' 0_C, T2" MIN (2) #4 CONTINLIOUS AROUNO PERIMETER #8 AWG BARE COPPER BONDCNG WIRE G EACH CORNER OFPOOL &SPA 16' MAX EQUIPOTENTIAL BONDING GRID DETAIL i ENTRY GATE i PROVIDE EQUlPOTENTIAL 9ONbIK D," L50 GAL ROPANE TANK MIN FROM RE POOL PROFILE DOZE 7`BLQK WALL SWALE 17o MIN r RAISE3 BOND BEAM EXISTING WALL • PROPOSED POOL = 600 5F SURFACE POOL PERIMETER = 140 LF 5 89 57' 00" E 79.95' T a CS 0 z 5 89 57' 00" E 100.00' F.F. +16' NEXT DOOR ` BLOCK WALL SWALE 1% MIN 0- 8" PECIPC. WA7ER LINE ............ PROVIDE EQUD OTENTIAL BONpTN& GRID SW ALE 1% MIN EX TING WALL t1 11'-0" 05' NC05' 23"W 9.95' r4v reoL EO&I'Mf 1 0%c Eic19"ita G }.4 tr L— To 65 14,E — -7f VICINITY MAP Lower La Quinta Cove Bear Creek Path (Abandoned Calla Tampie9 V AY,C► LIFDA OCAPNIARRANZA LA QUINTA 1 AVENLialm 1 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • APN: 773-061-026 LOT # 22 NiONTELLI Avenida Vallcjrf CALLE I PROPERTY AbbRE55: 51-030 Avenida Carranza La Quinta, CA OWNER: JAA DALE AND LNDA WISSMAN 760-564-6072 0 11.1433 CITY BUILD1NQ & SAFETY DEPT, APPROVED FOR CONTRU TION IDA 4l BY tan VM' Cal JL -ofvk L ``i ch, CO co c r >.„i 1zr 3 N (-)0X BRIAN T. DIEBOLT OATE 02/24/10 scALE 1"8' P Wissraon -7. O • 0 0 WATER SURFACE fi 8'-6" MAX. DEPTH cc PRE-GAST COPING CONC. DECKING 6" #30 6"O.C. VERT STL, 3" CLR. - I • 33 16" MIN, LAP 8.. M1� a,r TRANSITION 4" j 3Q12"O.G. HORIZ. STL. If) TFIROUGHCUT 33? MAX. DEEP END RAMP CONC. DECK PI 4 MILL VISQUEEN 6" CONC. BLK. w #3 48"O.0. VERT. STL. SOLID GROUT ALL CELLS 4 #3P BOND BEAM rrr 4 #30 BOND BEAM 501 MASTIC ff3 1< HORIZ. mil THK. YER11 INA DEPTH . iN FEET HOM 4" 4" 0 4" 4" 1 FT.1 4" 4" 2Fr. 4" 4" 3f-r. 5" 5" Al -Fr. 6" 6I 5Fr' 6" 6" air. 6" B.. 7Fr. 6" 9" 87. # 3C: 6" 0.C. POOL SIDE 4' mild_ w%RECK rtn. $' MIN. W/O DECK 70. 1/To 1 /4- 4R AS REQ'D .I BOND BEAM STL. 3 #3 FOR NON -EXPANSIVE SOIL 4 #3 FOR EXPANSIVE SOIL WATER SURFACE 1-I 1 1_44 ,4A0 1 21"t .C` VERT Sr, --Li NOTE: THIS SECTION - CAN BE USED FOR DEEP END RAMPS UP TO 5' IN DEPTH USE 4 #4 BAR BOND - - BEAM AND EXTEND BARS 3' EA. SIDE OF RAMP WALL THICKNESS TO CHANGE - UNIFORMLY POOL DEPTH 5'0" OR MORE WATER PLASTER RAISED BOND REAM O BRASS ELECT. PULL BOX 10h' ABOVE WATER 1/2" 0 BRASS 10' MIN. LENGTH 4„ MIN 4'-0" 12" HMS ru�rr+r� Al +rRl� #3® 6" 0.C. BOTH WAYS AROUND NICHE cv STP ETR T EL 13 t •••1.- 18" MIN. TRANSITION STD. REINFORCEMENT &DIMENSION O MASTIC EXPANSIVE JOINT RECESSED LIGHT SECTION AT LIGHT BOX 0 rrrr=re - , -/■ rE - - D REINF. GUN1TE #30 12" 0.C. BOTH WAYS 4- 12" #30 BOND BM. MASONARY COPING R R M0 TA PLASTER BOND BEAM STANDARD COPING & 7fLE° WATER LEVEL =ar Tr! tfrlf�rrr 2 #3 BARS 4" M1 ELEVATION MAIN SUMP DRAIN AT LOW POINT DUAL INLETS PER PLUMBING CODE. 4" MIN PLAN DECK 3 1/2" CONC. SLAB 15 LB. FELT OR 4 MILL VISQUEEN SCHEDULE - RADIUS SCHEDULE POOL DEPTH „R„ 3'-6„ 1' 0" 4'-0" 1'-0" 5'-D" 1,-6" 5'-6" 2'-D" 6"-O" 2'-6" I 6'-6" 3T-0" �._0„ 3h-6" 7'--6" 4'-U" 8'-0" 4'-6�, 8'-6" 5'-O" #30 12" O_C, B.W. IN POOL BOTTOM CENTER ALL STL, IN GUNITE FINISH GRADE TO WASTE 3" MIN. OR / A5 REQ'D BY CITY -oast r=urfr �i,�nrr-�rrrr „P„ TRAP DETAI LEVEL BOND BM. w f GROUT BEFORE POURING DECK MASTIC TILE PLASTER _ BOND BEAM - CANT. CONC. DECKING BEND BOND BM. STL. AROUND NICHE SKIMMER NICHE DETAILO TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL SECTION 0 z R-2.6" MAX. R=1'0" MIN. ADD #3 12" O.C. __LONGITUDINAL c TRANSITION WHEN REQ'D B' BLDG. DEPT. DECK OR CAP MIN. $6, Trr1' 4" M I I #3 VERT STL. CD 12" 0.C. 18" 45 4" MI FIN. GR. ('NEW FELL 4 #3 BOND REAM #3o, 12"0,C, HORIZ., STL. THROUGHOUT #3g' 12"O.C. VERT STL_ NAT. GR. " CLR WATER SURFACE 0 16" LAP TYPICAL POOL BOTTOM r18" MIf f5'" TRANS. SHALLOW END FILL ADJACENT TO POOL O 2 #3 BOND BM. #3 12" 0.C. VERT STL, & STRAIGHT WALL #30 12" O.C. 24" a�r 4" TYP_ BOTTOM SECTION N #3@ 12" 0.C. B.W. `SEE TYP, POOL SECTION TYPICAL INFINITE EDGE SECTION 2 #3 BOND BM, WATER SURFACE #3 HORIZ STL. 12" 0.C. #30 12" 0.C. VERT STL. & STRAIGHT WALL SPA z 4" TYP. BOTTOM SECTION W/ #3 12" 0,C_ B.W. SEE TYP. POOL SECTION SPA ADJACENT TO POOL TYPICAL SPA SECTION MASONARY DECK 4'-ID" MY . N WATEIJSLJRFACE WATER SURFACE NOTES 0 1, POOL SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENCLOSED BY APPROVED FENCE. FENCE SHALL BE M. 5"-0" HIGH ABOVE THE GROUND. GATES SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING, WITH LATCH 4'-5" MIN. ABOVE THE GROUND, AS PER LOCAL ORDINANCES, 2, POOL SHALL NOT BE FILLED WITH WATER UNTIL THE FENCE ENCLOSURE HAS NEEN CONSTRUCTED AND APPROVED. 3. PUBLIC POOLS REQUIRE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. 4. POOL EQUIPMENT IS NOT PERMITTED IN FRONT YARD OR A REQUIRED SIDE YARD ADJACENT TO MAIN BUILDING, 5. POOL SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH APPROVED FILTER AND DRAIN. ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING PERMITS TO BE TAKEN OIJT AT THE SAME TIME AS POOL BUILDING PERMIT. 7. CEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO UBC STD, 26--1, A.S.T.M. C 150.62, 175.65. 8. GUNITE SHALL NNOT BE LESS THAN 1 TO 4 11/2, 28 DAY 2000 P.S,I, CCMP. 9. STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO A.S.T.M. A 615 GR. 40, LAPPED 40 DIA. 10. POOL SHALL BE MIN. 5'-0" FROM BUILDINGS, TREES, DR PROPERTY LINES. 11. SOIL SHALL HAVE BEARING 1000 #1 FT. UNDISTURBED EARTH NO GROUND WATER, 12. GUNITE TO BE PLACED AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH EXCEPT FILL & RAMP. 13. PLUMBING & ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION T CONFORM TO LOCAL CODES. 14. KEEP CONCRETE CONSTANTLY DAMP FOR 14 DAYS. 15. MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN EARTH AND STEEL TO BE 2". (AREAS OF HIGH SULFATE IN THE SOIL IT SHALL BE AND BE TYPE 5 CEMENT CONCRETE. 4000 PSI) TYPICAL BOND X 12" PLANTER #30 12" O.C. POOL DEPTH #30 6" 0.C. POOL DEPTH POOL POOL SIDE BEAM W/4 #3 SEE SCHEDULE 2 5'0" OR LESS BOND BEAM STL. CONC. POOL SIDE WATER SURFACE DECKING 5'0" OR MORE PLACE ADOIT. VEFLT.STL_. IN WALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SCHEDULE 2. D SEE SCHEDULE 1&2 16"MIN. LAP BUILDING SURCHARGE O DESIGN POOL FOR EARTH PRESSURE EMPTY, NO GROUND WATER, PERMEABLE SOIL. fc= 2000 P.S.I., fs= 16000 P.S.I. n=15. w= 30# eq. fl. PRESSURE +M= WD 3/6 fc © 7.5' P- 122 2}C3 =.0061 np�09 K .344 ,1=.88 2X6200 - 380 P,S.k, < 900 ALLOW .394X.88X12X32 fc C 2.5' POOL FULL UNSUPPORTED M- 625X2.5,<12 +630 = 2580 AS= 2580 __ POOL 16x.68X2 W +M1 -M# LB. NET M# d AS d" 3 1600 500 1100 2 04 4 3B00 1200 2500 3 06 5 7500 2500 4900 4 _ 09 6 15000 6200 6800 4 12 7 20500 13000 7500 4 13 7.5 25300 19100 6200 3 14 PLANTER VENEER -_ WEEP HOLES POOL �rri�xr�,lrtr��� RAISED PLANTER �rrf=rf�� ALTERNATE TO BARRIER PUT IN CONC. BOTTOM CONC. FT'G MOISTURE BARRIER PROVIDE PLAN & CALCS. FOR RET. WALL. EXPANSIVE SOIL ONLY 0 POOL CALCULATIONS DECK �rf�A�rr= lir rif NOTE; EXPANSION JOINTS REQ'D IN DECK AT ICY- 0" 0.C. . 09 <11 XPANSIVE jj, SOIL ONE STORY HOUSE OR GARAGE FOUND- ATION, 1000 LB./Fl. OR FENCE EXPANSIVE SOIL SCHEDULE 2 OFI AS REQUIRED BOND ALL METALS WITHIN 5' OF WATERS EDGE. AU_ PEDESTRIAN GATES TO BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF -LATCHING, DESIGNEE TO KEEP DOOR SECURELY CLOSED AT ALL TIMES WHEN NOT IN ACTUAL USL GATE TO SWING AWAY FROM POOL SURCHARGE ADDIT. VERT. STL. BLANK MEANS NO SPECIAL THICKNESS OR REINF. REQUIRED 1/2" Extruded Polystyrene Seperotion WATER SURFACE t D SEE SCHEDULE 1/2" MIN. APPROVED SEALANT REMAINDER OF JOIN IN CELOTEX OR OTHER EXP. MATERIAL EXPANSIVE JOINT ALL SETBACKS TO BE A MIN, OF 5' FROM WATERS EDGE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL ONE STORY HOUSE ATION, OR ROCK DEEPENED FOOTING 0 NOTE: THIS PLAN IS FOR THE LOWER DESERT AREA ONLY IN THE CITY OF INDIO AND ALL AREAS TO THE SOUTH SEE NOTE REGARDING STEEL CLEARANCE TO SOIL. POOL GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO FILLING THE SWIMMING POOL WITH WATER, AN APPROVED BARRIER (I.E, UL APPROVED ALARM SYSIN OR FENCE) MUST BE CHECK CLEARANCE OF SERVICE DRDPS WITH ELECTRIC COMPANY \_.NO OPENINGS MORE THAN 4". NOTE: All FENCING TO BE MIN. 5' IN IF POOL EQUIPT. IS LESS THAN 10' FROM ANY WO01:3 FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE, A 5' MSRY. SOUND WALL MAY BE REQUIRED, ( CHECK WITH BUILDING OFFICIAL) SIZE X AREA 12 DEPTH TO BLANK MEANS NO SPECIAL THICKNESS OR REINF. REQUIRED 1/2" Extruded Polystyrene Seperotion WATER SURFACE t D SEE SCHEDULE 1/2" MIN. APPROVED SEALANT REMAINDER OF JOIN IN CELOTEX OR OTHER EXP. MATERIAL EXPANSIVE JOINT ALL SETBACKS TO BE A MIN, OF 5' FROM WATERS EDGE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL ONE STORY HOUSE ATION, OR ROCK DEEPENED FOOTING 0 NOTE: THIS PLAN IS FOR THE LOWER DESERT AREA ONLY IN THE CITY OF INDIO AND ALL AREAS TO THE SOUTH SEE NOTE REGARDING STEEL CLEARANCE TO SOIL. POOL GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO FILLING THE SWIMMING POOL WITH WATER, AN APPROVED BARRIER (I.E, UL APPROVED ALARM SYSIN OR FENCE) MUST BE CHECK CLEARANCE OF SERVICE DRDPS WITH ELECTRIC COMPANY \_.NO OPENINGS MORE THAN 4". NOTE: All FENCING TO BE MIN. 5' IN IF POOL EQUIPT. IS LESS THAN 10' FROM ANY WO01:3 FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE, A 5' MSRY. SOUND WALL MAY BE REQUIRED, ( CHECK WITH BUILDING OFFICIAL) SIZE X AREA 12 DEPTH TO UNER POOL CAPACITY GALS. PUMP MOTER H.P. FILTER SO. FT. VACUUM UNE & SKIMMER RETURN LINE MAIN DRAIN SKIMMER MODEL BACKWASH LINE ANTI SIPHON VALVE HEATER SIZE BTU GASLINE BY: VENTED BY; LIGHT CLOCK ELECTRIC BY7 ELECTRICAL BONDING BY. POOL CLEANER CHLORINATOR BOARD -SIZE BOARD SUPPORTS MEN SLIDE # cum HocrouP GRADING STUB PLUMB DYES ONO DECK BY: NOTES POOL NOT TO SCAL.E DEEP ENID SHALLOW END UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: IS SHALLOW TO DEEP THS PLAN AND HEREBY APPROVE POOL AND EOUIPIvIENT LOCATION CUSTOMERS SIGNATURE DATE SPA GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS SPA TYPE: mcc# DIMENSION: COLOR TOTAL GALLONS SPA JLIS TILE HEATER: PUMP & MOTOR AtR BLOWER GAS LINE: PLUMBING FOR SPA: ELECTRICAL: CLOCK: EXCAVATION DECKING SOLAR GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS PANEL TYPE PANEL SIZE NUMBER PANELS PLUMB RIJN AUTOMATIC mAN UAL THERMOMETERS BOOSTER P UM P APPROVED TO DETERMINE APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF POOL ON DAY cw ICAVATION POOL AREA TO BE FENCED, BY OWN F LR COUNTY OR CITY ORDINANCE. GATES TO BE SELF CLOSING ANJD SELF DO NOT TURN ON POOL LJ GEM WHEN POOL IS EMPTY POOL OR SPA NAME CROSS STREETS RES. PHONE BUS. PHONE SWIMMING POOL CONSTRUCTION Farm Eland, Ca. 92271 Fax: 709-77g4143 • ENGINEERING, INa