Loading...
2007 11 27 PCcity of La Quinta Planning Commission Agendas are now available on the City's Web Page @ www.la-guinta.org PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Council Chamber 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California NOVEMBER 27, 2007 7:00 P.M. **NOTE** ALL ITEMS NOT CONSIDERED BY 11:00 P.M. WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING Beginning Resolution 2007-047 Beginning Minute Motion 2007-018 I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call II. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 13, 2007. PUBLIC HEARINGS: For all Public Hearings on the Agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Executive Secretary prior to the start of the Planning Commission consideration of that item. The Chairman will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing, may appear and be heard in support of, or . in opposition to, the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. A. Item ................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2007-896 Applicant............. Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District (CVRPD) Location .............. Southeast quadrant of Jefferson Street and Avenue 58 (Bureau of Reclamation Property) Request .............. Consideration of Phase 1 (6.2 acres of 253 total acres► Development Plans (Passive Public Park, Trails, and Interpretive Center) for the "Coral Mountain Discovery Park". Action........ :........ Request to continue B. Item .................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2007-895 Applicant ............. K. Hovnanian Homes Location .............. The northwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 58 Request ............... Consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for three new prototypical residential plan types (2,514 to 3,178 square feet) for use in Tract 30092 (Piazza Serena). Action ................ Resolution 2007- VI. BUSINESS ITEM: VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: Vill. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Review of City Council meeting of November 20, 2007. IX. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting of the Planning Commission will be adjourned to a Regular Meeting to be held on December 11, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing ,Agenda for the La Quinta Planning Commission meeting of Tuesday, November 27, 2007, was posted on the outside entry to the Council, - Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and the bulletin board at the La Quinta Cove Post Office, on Wednesday, November 21, 2007. DATED: November 21, 2007 BET PQuint*aCaliforZnia ement Assistant City of L Public Notices The La Quinta City, council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special„ equipment' is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at 777-7123, twenty-four (24 hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the Planning Commission, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's office at 777-7123. A one (1) week notice is required. If background materials is to be presented to the Planning Commission during a Planning Commission meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the Executive Secretary for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 7:00 p.m. meeting., MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 13, 2007 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commissionwas called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Alderson who asked Commissioner, Barrows to lead the flag salute. Chairman Alderson.introduced Robert'' Wilkerson to the Commission and asked him to give account of his history, B. Present: Commissioners Katie Barrows, Jim Engle, Paul Quill, Robert Wilkinson, and Chairman Ed Alderson.` C. Staff present: Assistant;City,Manager Doug Evans, Planning Director Les Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston, Planning Manager David Sawyer, Principal Planner Andrew Mogen'sen, Assistant Planner Eric Ceja, and Executive Secretary, Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS:,, A. Chairman Alderson asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of October 9; 2007. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Quill to approve the minutes as submitted. ,Unanimously approved. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Conditional Use Permit 2007-106; a request of PetSmart #1230 for consideration of a request to allow two outdoor metal containers for the temporary storage of seasonal merchandise at the rear of the building from October 15, 2007 through January 4, 2008 for the property located at 79-375 Highway 111, within the Centre at La Quinta Shopping Center. 1 . Chairman Alderson opened the public hearing and asked for the P:\Reports - PC\2007\11-27-07\PC Minutes 11-13-07.doc Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 staff report. Associate Planner Eric presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. 2. Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Quill noted the containers -were at least screened and the applicant had responded to the City's letter in regard to storage containers during the holiday,season. Planning Director Les Johnson noted this was the first request staff had received from any of the retail stores, but the' -applicant did place the containers before receiving approval ;'Code Enforcement is working with staff to continue to resolve the problem staff faces each year. Commissioner Quill asked how long this_ -store has been open. Staff stated approximately three years. Commissioner Quill stated this again is a business that is newly constructed and here they are asking for additional space for seasonal sales. Staff stated they have been inquiring of the major stores of their seasonal needs_ during discussions prior to approval by the Commission and/or Council 3. There _being no further questions -.of staff, Chairman Alderson asked if the applicant would like to -address the Commission. The applicant declined to speak. 4. `There being no`other public comment, the public hearing was closed and'open for Commission discussion. 5. Commissioner Barrows asked if staff's letter clearly states that a permit is required before the storage containers can be placed on site. Staff stated yes, but they could enhance on the letter and send it out earlier next year to encourage compliance. Chairman Alderson asked that on the major businesses he would request this issue be addressed during the application and approval 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Barrows to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-044 approving Conditional Use Permit 2007-106 as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Engle, Wilkinson and Chairman Alderson. NOES: Commissioner Quill. ABSTAIN: E Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 None. ABSENT: None. B. Site Development Permit 2007-892• a request of Tarlos & Associates for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a 7,000 square foot restaurant to be located south of Highway 1 1 1, southwest corner of Depot Drive in the Komar Desert Center. 1. Chairman Alderson opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the information contained in the staff report -'a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department 2. Chairman Alderson asked if there were any "questions of staff. Commissioner Engle commended the applicant on the architecture and landscaping of the bui.lding. 3. Commissioner Quill asked if they were approving the landscaping plan as well. Staff clarified only the landscaping around the perimeter of this building. The Center's landscaping has already been approved. The applicant is only responsible for the pad site itself. Commissioner Quill asked about the color combination; are they more compatible with the .Center than the exhibits show. Staff stated they are similar colors and do blend with the Center. 4. <` Commissioner Wilkinson noted the service container should be 5. Chairman Alderson agreed the trash container is right up front and even though he notes there isn't a better location, it should be better screened. Had there been any discussions regarding moving the building further to the east. Staff stated the pad was designed without knowing the tenant. Planning Director Les Johnson noted the number of times staff had met with the applicant regarding the design and layout of the building and this was the best alternative for this site. Chairman Alderson asked about the on -site drainage. "-.Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer stated the drainage was reviewed at the time the Center was approval. It is a vault that is self contained. 6. There being no further questions of the staff, Chairman Alderson asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mark Waver, representing Tarlos & Associates, stated he was available to answer any questions. 3 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 7. Commissioner Quill asked if the signage was part of the application. Staff stated no, there would be a separate sign program for the entire Center brought forward at a later date. 8. Commissioner Barrows stated she would like to see more vertical landscaping along the walls. Mr. Waver, landscape architect for the project, explained the landscape plan. 9. Chairman Alderson noted the masonry columns on the building and asked if this was similar to what, was approved for the Mimi's Restaurant. Mr. Waver statedit should be as this was discussed with staff. Planning Director Les Johnson stated they were assured the material would'be consistent, but the'color may be different. 10. Commissioner Quill noted the materials and colored boards were not provided. Mr. Waver stated they,had originally been submitted but with all the changes.,they have made, they were unable to obtain all the new samples. 11. There being no further ,questions- of the . applicant, Chairman Alderson asked if there was any other public comment. There being no public comment, the public hearing was closed and open 12. Commissioner Engle stated he likes the architecture and landscaping. 13. Commissioner, Barrows stated she is not seeing the conditions recommended by the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee. Staff stated the applicant has already added them into their plans so staff did not add them to the conditions. 14. Commissioner Quill stated there is no condition that there will be consistency with regard to the colors and materials. Staff noted it is contained in the Specific Plan for the Center. Should the Commission desire, conditions could be added to this permit. Commissioner Quill asked that a condition be added to reflect this. 15. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-045 approving Site Development Permit 2007- 4 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 892, as recommended and amended: a. Condition added: The materials shall be consistent with the remainder of the Center. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Engle, Quill, Wilkinson, and Chairman Alderson. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. C. Zoning: Code Amendment 2007-094; a' request of the. City for consideration of an Amendment to Title 9, Chapter 9.60 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to modify the City's,density'bonus and affordable housing incentives in accordance with State law. 1. Chairman Alderson opened the public hearing and`asked for the staff report. Planning Manager, David Sawyer presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department 2. Chairman Alderson asked if this was, a mandate would it also encourage the developers to provide affordable housing within -their market rate homes. Planning Director Les Johnson clarified that the City is required to meet its allocation of affordable units. Even though this ordinance is relatively new and a lot to understand,` it does provide an opportunity for the City to meet its obligations in regard to housing. 3. Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Quill asked where you find the definition for very low-, low-, `and moderate -income. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated it was within the State Health and Safety regulations. It is usually less than 50% of the median for the County they live within. Commissioner Quill asked if the City had the ability to define that number for the,applicant. Also, is this verbatim from the Government Code. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated yes, because essentially we are not able to deviate from it except in very few areas. Commissioner Quill clarified that even if this was not adopted it was a State law. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated yes. There has been a lot of discussion within several communities and the decision was made to conform to it to avoid confusion. Commissioner Quill asked for the definition of equity sharing. "Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated the City's Municipal Code and the practice of the City is to require equity 5 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 sharing despite the recent changes and this has been done through deed restrictions for affordable uses. The change with this Code section is that with respect to moderate -income for sale for common interest units there is now a requirement under State law that there be an equity sharing agreement. The owner if he sells it they are allowed to recoup their purchase price, any improvements they have put into it, and 50 percent of the appreciation. The Agency would receive the other 50 percent to continue funding affordable housing. Commissioner Quill asked if there was the ability to reduce two development standards; is that the developer's choice or the City's: Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated the way the law is written the developer would indicate how many affordable units they intend to build they are entitled to "X" '`number of incentives.:` This is the minimum number they are allowed, the City can granfmore. It is their option to request, and the Cityis restrictive in what it can do to deny their request. Should the City not want to grant their request, the City must make findings to show that it would be a significant adverse impact to, the >.community. Discussion followed. , 4. Chairman, Alderson asked if this applies to the current affordable housing `we have in place. Assistant ,City Attorney Michael Houston stated there`.is a difference, in the equity sharing agreements between what the City does as compared to what the Agencydoes. What.this'statutory change does is a circumstance desires to take advantage of density bonus incentives and has with respect to the equity sharing agreements, has moderate - income for sale or common interest development. The revised equity, sharing agreements only applies to moderate -income households. The distinction is that if you buy a home from the Agency and you sell it, the Agency will receive all the profit. In addition, the Agency has the first right of refusal to purchase the property to keep it within the affordable housing covenants. The difference is this is an incentive to get developers to provide the City with more moderate -income units. 5. There being no further questions of the staff, Chairman Alderson asked if there was any public comment. There being no public comment, the public hearing was closed and open for .Commission discussion. 6 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-046, approving Zoning Code Amendment 2007- .094, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Engle, Quill, Wilkinson, and Chairman Alderson. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. BUSINESS ITEMS: None CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: 'None. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Chairman Alderson gave a review of:, the City Council meeting of November 27, 2007 and the Chambei Workshop meeting. B. Commissioner Quill asked what alternative the,City has to enforce major stores from placing the, storage containers behind their stores for the holiday season. Planning Director Les Johnson stated the Planning Department is working in conjunction with the Code Compliance Department to act upon the violations as soon as they are seen. C. Planning' Director Les Johnson' introduced David Sawyer who has been hired as the Planning Manager for the City and stated he has been a great addition to the staff. ADJOURNMENT: There being no, further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Quill to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting to be held'on,November 27, 2007. This regular meeting was adjourned at 8:18 p.m. on November 13, 2007. Respectfully submitted, Betty Sawyer, Management Assistant City of La Quinta, California 7 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA, November 13, 2007 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commissil" ni as,ealled to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Alderson who asked Commission®r Barrows to lead the flag salute. Chairman Alderson introduced Robert <Wilkerson to the Commission and asked him to give=account of his history,. B. Present: Commissioners Katie Barrows, ;Jim Engle, Paul -Quill, Robert Wilkinson, and Chairman Ed Aldersort "" C. Staff present: Assistant City Manager Doug Evans, Planning Director Les Johnson, Assistant City: Attorney Michael Houston, Planning Manager David Sawyer, Principal Plann&r Aridrew Mogensen, Assistant Planner Eric Ceia, and,Executive`Secretary 8etty;Sawyer, II. PUBLIC III. CONFIRMA IV. V Chairman Alderson asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of October 9, 2007. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded ny CommisSpners Engle/Quill to approve the minutes as submitted. PUBLIC HEAftNGS: A. Conditional Use Permit 2007-106; a request of PetSmart #1230 for consideration of a request to allow two outdoor metal containers for the temporary storage of seasonal merchandise at the rear of the building from October 15, 2007 through January 4, 2008 for the property located at 79-375 Highway 111, within the Centre at La Quinta Shopping Center. 1. Chairman Alderson opened the public hearing and asked for the PAReports - PC\2007\11-27-07\PC Minutes 11-13-07.doc Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 staff report. Associate Planner Eric presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. 2. Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Quill noted the containers were at least screened and the applicant had responded to the City's letter in regard to storage containers during the holiday season. Planning Director Les Johnson noted this was the first?equest staff had received from any of the retail stores, bu4 .tfie applicant did place the containers before receiving approval. .k Code Enforcement is working with staff to continue to resolve the problem staff faces each year. Comm issioner,Qpill asked how long.this store has been open. Staff stated approximately three years. Conitnissioner Quill stated this again is a business that is -newly constructed and here they are asking for additions}, spade for seasonal sales. Staff stated they have been inquifing' of the, major stores of their seasonal needs,"during discussions, prior to approval by the Commission and/or11CoIuncil. 3. There being no further questions;,of staff, Chairman Alderson asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. The. lined a comment, the public hearing was ion discussion. 5. Commissioner Barrows asked if staff's letter clearly states that a permit is required before the storage containers can be placed on site. Staff stated yes, but they could enhance on the letter and send 10t'out earlier next year to encourage compliance. in Alderson asked that on the major businesses he would this issue be addressed during the application and approval 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Barrows to adopt _Planning Commission Resolution 2007-044 approving Conditional Use Permit 2007-106 as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows; Engle, Wilkinson and Chairman Alderson. NOES: Commissioner Quill. ABSTAIN: 2 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 None. ABSENT: None. B. Site Development Permit 2007-892; a request of Tarlos & Associates for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a 7,000 square foot restaurant to be located south of Highway 1 1 1, southwest corner of Depot Drive in the Komar Desert Center. 1. Chairman Alderson opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Andrew: Mogensen presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department 2. Chairman Alderson asked if there were any' questions of staff. Commissioner Engle commended the applicant on the architecture and landscaping of the building. 3. Commissioner Quill asked plan as well. .Staff clar perimeter of this building. been approved: The appli itself. Commissioner Quill they more compatible wi Staff stated they are`simil (l A hey were approving the landscaping ed `only the landscaping around the The Center's landscaping has already. int is only responsible for the pad site isked aboutthe `color combination; are lathe Center than the exhibits show. colors and do blend with the Center. noted the service container should be 5. ' Chairman Alderson agreed the trash container is right up front and even though he notes there isn't a better location, it should be better screened. Had there been any discussions regarding moving the building further to the east. Staff stated the pad was designed without knowing the tenant. Planning Director Les Johnson noted the number of times staff had met with the applicant regarding the design and layout of the building and this was the best alternative for this site. Chairman Alderson asked about the on -site drainage. Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer stated the drainage was reviewed at the time the Center was approval. It is a vault that is self contained. 6. There being no further questions of the staff, Chairman Alderson asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mark Waver, representing Tarlos & Associates, stated he was available to answer any questions. Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 7. Commissioner Quill asked if the signage was part of the application. Staff stated no, there would be a separate sign program for the entire Center brought forward at a later date. B. Commissioner Barrows stated she would like to see more vertical landscaping along the walls. Mr. Waver,, landscape architect for the project, explained the landscape plan,' 9. Chairman Alderson noted the masonry columns on the building and asked if this was similar to whet -was approved for the Mimi's Restaurant. Mr. Waver stated it should be'a§ this was discussed with staff. Planning Director Les Johnson stated they were assured the material would be consistent; but the ;color may be .different. 10. Commissioner Quill noted the materials and colored boards were not provided. Mr.,Waver stated they.had originally been submitted but with all the changes they have made, they were unable to obtain all the new` samples, 11. 'There being no fu`rther,� questions of the applicant, Chairman Alderson `asked if there was any other public comment. There tieing no public comment, the public hearing was closed and open ` Commissioner Engle.' stated he likes the architecture and 13. CommissionerBarrows stated she is not seeing the conditions recommended by the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee. Staff stated the applicant has already added them into their plans so staff did not add them to the conditions. 14. "Commissioner Quill stated there is no condition that there will be consistency with regard to the colors and materials. Staff noted it is contained in the Specific Plan for the Center. Should the Commission desire, conditions could be added to this permit. Commissioner Quill asked that a condition be added to reflect this. 15. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Engle/Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-045 approving Site Development Permit 2007- 0 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 892, as recommended and amended: a. Condition added: The materials shall be consistent with the remainder of the Center. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Engle, Quill, Wilkinson, and Chairman Alderson. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. C. Zoning Code Amendment 2007-094; a:,,request of the City for consideration of an Amendment to Title 9 Chapter 9.60 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to modify the City's d°ensity°.bonus and affordable housing incentives in accordance with=State law.' 1. Chairman Alderson opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager: David Sawyer presented the information contained in the staffreport,-a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department 2. Chairman Alderson asked if this was. a mandate would it also encourage the developers to,provide affordable housing within their, market rate 'homes —RI anning Director Les Johnson clarified that the'City is required to meet its allocation of affordable units. Even though this ordinance is relatively new and a lot to .understand, it does provide an opportunity for the City to meet its obligations in regard to housing. 3:, , , Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions of staff. ;Commissioner Quill asked where you find the definition for very low low-,. and moderate -income. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated it was within the State Health and Safety regulations. It is usually less than 50% of the median for the County they live within. Commissioner Quill asked if the City had the 86ility to define that number for the applicant. Also, is this verbatim from the Government Code. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated yes, because essentially we are not able to deviate from it except in very few areas. Commissioner Quill clarified that even if this was not adopted it was a State law. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated yes. There has been a lot of discussion within several communities and the decision was made to conform to it to avoid confusion. Commissioner Quill asked for the definition of equity sharing. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated the City's Municipal Code and the practice of the City is to require equity 5 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 U sharing despite the recent changes and this has been done through deed restrictions for affordable uses. The change with this Code section is that with respect to moderate -income for sale for common interest units there is now a requirement under State law that there be an equity sharing agreement. The owner if he sells it they are allowed to recoup their purchase price, any improvements they have put into it, :and 50 percent of the appreciation. The Agency would receive=the other 50 percent to continue funding affordable housing .Commissioner Quill asked if there was the ability to reduce two' development standards; is that the developer's choice or the City's. 4Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated the„way the law is'writ$en the developer would indicate how many affordable units they intend to build they are entitled to "X" number of incentives., This is the minimum number they are allowed, the City can grant more. It is their option to request, and the Citys restrictive in what it can do to deny their request. Should th"e City not want to grant their request, the Citymust make findings to show that it would be a significant adv arse, impact to th6' community. Discussion ,followed. lhairmanAlderson askedif this applies to the current affordable lousing we have in,,place. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston stated there °,is a difference in the equity sharing agreements between what the City does as compared to what the Agepey,does. What this statutory change does is a circumstance take advantage of density bonus incentives and has sct to the equity sharing agreements, has moderate- r sale or common interest development. The revised arirg agreements only applies to moderate -income s. The distinction is that if you buy a home from the id you sell it, the Agency will receive all the profit. In he Agency has the first right of refusal to purchase the o keep it within the affordable housing covenants. The is this is an incentive to get developers to provide the City with more moderate -income units. 5. There being no further questions of the staff, Chairman Alderson asked if there was any public comment. There being no public comment, the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 0 Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2007 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Quill to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2007-046, approving Zoning Code Amendment 2007- 094, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Engle, Quill, Wilkinson, and Chairman Alderson. NOES:;=None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. BUSINESS ITEMS: None CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Chairman Alderson November 27, 200'. B. Commissioner Quill as stores from placing tl holiday season., Plar Department is worki Department to act:uoc C. Planning ing M ENT: a review' of the City Council meeting of ie Chamber Workshop meeting. d what alternative tfie City has to enforce major storage containers behind their stores for the ng; Director Les Johnson stated the Planning in conjunction with the Code Compliance the violations as soon as they are seen. i''introduced David Sawyer who has been for the City and stated he has been a great There beingno,, further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Quill to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting to be heldson November 27, 2007. This regular meeting was adjourned at 8:18 p.m. on November 13, 2007. Respectfully submitted, Betty Sawyer, Management Assistant City of La Quinta, California 7 PH #A DATE: CASE NO: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: PLANNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 27, 2007 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2007-896 COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION AND PARKS DISTRICT RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF PHASE 1 (6.2 ACRES OF 253 TOTAL ACRES) DEVELOPMENT PLANS (PASSIVE PUBLIC PARK, TRAILS; AND INTERPRETIVE CENTER) FOR THE "CORAL MOUNTAIN DISCOVERY PARK" LOCATION: SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 58 (ON BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PROPERTY) BACKGROUND: The,project site located south of PGA West and east of Lake Cahuilla, contains a total of 253+ acres. CVRPD is proposing Phase 1 of two phases to develop a "discovery" park on the site which is owned by the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). REQUEST TO CONTINUE: The applicants havebeen trying to get the BOR to sign the application as required by City requirements. The item was advertised hoping we would have the signature in time for this meeting. To date, we have not received it. Therefore, we request that this Site Development Permit request be continued to the next meeting.on December 11, 2007. RECOMMENDATION: Continue consideration of Site Development Permit 2007-896 to the meeting of December 11, 2007. Transmitted by: Stan Sawa, Principal Planner PAReports - PC\2007\11-27-07\sdp 2007-896 pc rpt- continuation.doc PH #B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 2007 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2007-895 APPLICANT: K. HOVANANIAN HOMES ARCHITECT: EDINGER ARCHIRECTS ARCHITECT: LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THREE PROTOTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL PLANS FOR USE IN TRACT 30092 (PIAZZA SERENA) LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF MONROE STREET AND AVENUE 58 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: THE LA QUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE REQUEST HAS BEEN ASSESSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417 PREPARED FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 30092, WHICH WAS CERTIFIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 3, 2001. NO CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS ARE PROPOSED WHICH WOULD TRIGGER THE PREPARATION OF SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 SINCE THIS PROJECT IMPLEMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 30092. SURROUNDING LAND USES: NORTH: RESIDENCES UNDER CONSTRUCTION SOUTH: DATE PLAN GROVE AND RESIDENCE EAST: VACANT LAND AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY WEST: IID CORPORATE OFFICES AND SUBSTATION GENERAL PLAN/AND ZONING DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BACKGROUND: The project site is Piazza Serena, a 97 lot residential subdivision in south La Quinta (Attachment 1). The applicant has constructed 37 residences consisting of three prototypical home plans approved in October 2004. The applicant is proposing to construct three new, prototypical plans on the remaining 60 lots. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Architecture: The applicant has submitted prototypical plans for three residential model plans (Attachment 2). Each plan is designed with three front elevation treatments. The plans as described by the applicant utilize. Spanish eclectic, Southern European and Italian country styles of architecture and are proposed to be between 2,514 square feet with no options and 3,178 square feet in size with all options. Plan 1 show's as an option a second story roofed skydeck. This space is partially enclosed, but will not have windows or a door and is accessed from an outdoor family room on the first floor. Plans 2 and 3 are one story plans. All plans have various options that either convert interior rooms to other functions or convert the third car garage to living space. The plans identify the building height of Plan 1 as 18'-1 1 " without the skydeck and 23'-4" with the skydeck. Plan 2 would be 17'-1 1 " high with Plan 3 18'-9" high. Exterior sand finish plaster is proposed in beige to medium brown tones with contrasting darker tone trim and red/brown blends of concrete "S" roof tile. Some plan front elevations will use decorative stone or tile accents, composite material shutters, decorative exterior lights, and wrought iron and metal accents. Windows and most doors on the sides and rear will be provided with plastered popouts. Most front facing windows and the garage doors are recessed. Garage doors are wood sectional roll up doors. Material and color samples and color schemes have been submitted (Attachment 3). A preliminary plotting plan for the units has been submitted as part of the request (Attachment 4). Landscaping: Preliminary typical front yard landscaping plans have been submitted for the plans (Attachment 5). Typical front yard landscaping plans for the three plans include two trees, 5 gallon shrubs, one gallon groundcover and turf. The turf appears to cover approximately 60-70 per cent of the front yard area. Plant materials identified appear to primarily be low and medium water users. Included is a non -turf front yard option.for Plan 3. This plan can be adapted to any plan type and includes an Arizona river rock streambed and decomposed granite with some shrubs spread throughout. One tree will be 24-inch box with the second to be 15 gallons with the species to be: Cercidium floridum - Blue Palo Verde Rhus lancea - African Sumac Ceratonia siliqua - Carob Chilopsis linearis -Desert Willow Prosopis chilensis - Chilean Mesquite (recommended by ALRC to be replaced) PREVIOUS APPROVED PLANS As noted, 37 lots have been developed with home plans previously approved in 2004. Three plan types, of an architectural style similar to those currently proposed, were approved in sizes varying from 2,690 to 3,516 square feet with options (Attachment 6). The existing homes are similar in mass and height, except that none have a skydeck. The materials and exterior colors are in the same range of those currently proposed. Photographs of the front elevations of the existing models have also been submitted (Attachment 7). All existing homes, including the models have been sold. These plans will no longer be available for purchase. APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS: Under Zoning Code Section 9.60.300 pertaining to compatibility requirements for new plans in partially developed subdivisions, the new plan designs must be compatible in the areas of roofing, window treatment, garage door style, colors, roof lines, area, building mass, landscaping and scale. These standards are to ensure that additional new development within existing partially developed subdivisions is compatible with and not detrimental to surrounding existing development in the same subdivision. In summary, the main applicable standards ensure that: 1. The proposed residences are to be compatible with the surrounding residences. 2. The proposed residences shall fall within the approximate size range of the existing residences. 3. A minimum 24-inch box size tree is to be provided in the front yard with the same total number of trees as the previously constructed residences. ANALYSIS: Architecturally, the proposed plans are attractive and compatible in design, style material and colors with the existing units. The plans are maintaining the existing architectural flavor in design, materials and colors. They are introducing a second story skydeck which increases the height and mass for Plan 1, but are limited as to where it can be used to minimize impacts on existing homeowners. Compatibility requirements do not permit the Plan 1 units with skydecks to be on any lot adjacent to or abutting a lot line of an existing single-family home in the same subdivision. The units are required to be within a range that is no more than ten percent smaller or larger than the existing approved units. The smallest proposed plan at 2,514 square feet is 6.5 percent smaller than the smallest approved unit while the largest proposed plan is 338 square feet smaller than the largest unit with all livable area options selected. Therefore, the new units are in compliance with the size compatibility requirements. The proposed landscaping is similar to exiting front yards. The amount of turf area for the new plans will probably be smaller than the existing yards due to the current CVWD water efficient requirements, but will still be compatible with existing development. The final plotting of units will need to show where skydecks are proposed to ensure they are not abutting or adjacent to the existing units or within perimeter street image corridors. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE (ALRC): The ALRC reviewed this request at its meeting of November 7, 2007, and on a 3-0 vote recommended approval of the request with conditions recommended by staff (Attachment 8). PUBLIC NOTICE: This application was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on November 16, 2007. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code. As of this writing, no comments have been received. FINDINGS: The Findings for approval as required by Section 9.210.010 (Site Development Permits) of the Zoning Code can be made as noted below. 1. Architectural Design- The architectural design of the new plan types, including, but not limited to the architectural style, scale, building'mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements are compatible with other plans approved for construction in the tract and other surrounding development in the City. Furthermore, the proposed residential units comply with the standards in Section 9.60.300 of the Zoning Code pertaining to compatibility review for partially developed subdivisions, as noted above. 2. Compliance with CEQA- The Planning Department has determined that the request has been assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2001- 417 prepared for Tentative Tract 30092, which was certified by the City Council on July 3, 2001, and there are no changed circumstances or conditions proposed which would trigger the preparation of any subsequent environmental analysis. 3. Site Design- The site design of the project, including, but not limited to project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle ways, pedestrian amenities, and other site design elements have been established through approval of Tract 30092 and is compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. New residences with second floor skydecks are required to be built on lots not abutting or adjacent to existing units to provide compatibility. 4. Landscape Design- New home and project landscaping includes, but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials will be designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space. It will provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, complement the surrounding project area and comply with City and CVWD water efficiency, ensuring efficient water use. 5. Compliance with General Plan- The project is in compliance with the General Plan in that the property to be developed is designated for single-family residences as proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 2007 approving Site Development Permit 2007-895 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Architectural plans 3. Exterior building color and materials 4. Preliminary plotting plan 5. Preliminary landscape plans 6. Previously approved plans 7. Photographs of existing residences 8. Minutes of the ALRC meeting of November 7, 2007 Transmitted by: ��I/IN� SI.tMPA Stan Sawa, Principal Planner MINUTE MOTION 2007- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2007-895 K. HOVNANIAN HOMES DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 2007 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, ,officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this development application or any application thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. This approval is for the following model plans: 2. This approval is for the following model plans: Plan 1 - 2,514+ square feet Plan 2 — 2,782+ square feet Plan 3 — 2,974+ square feet 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for any of the units authorized by this approval, final working drawings shall be approved by the Planning Director. 4. This Site Development Permit is valid for two years, unless an extension is applied for and granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 9.200.080 of the Zoning Code. 5. SDP 2007-895 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures, which are incorporated by reference herein, for Tract 30092. In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Planning Director shall determine precedence. No development permits will be issued until compliance with these conditions has been achieved. 6. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies or departments, as required: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permits) • Planning Department P:\reports-pc\2007\11-27-07\sdp 2007-895 pc coa.doc MINUTE MOTION 2007 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2007-895 K. HOVNANIAN HOMES DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 2007 • Building and Safety Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 7. Air conditioning compressors by Zoning Code requirements cannot be placed in sideyards unless a minimum five foot clearance between compressor and side property line is provided. 8. Final landscaping and irrigation plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape professional, shall be reviewed by the ALRC and Public Works Director, and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of the first building permit. An application for Final Landscape Plan Check shall be submitted to the Planning Department for final landscape plan review. Said plans shall include all landscaping associated with this project and be in compliance with Chapter 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscaping) of the Municipal Code. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Coachella Valley Water District and Riverside County Agriculture Commissioner prior to submittal of the final plans to the Planning Department. 9. No more than 50% of each front yard area shall be in turf unless further restricted by CVWD. 10. Replace Prosopis chilensis, (Chilean Mesquite) with alternate tree. 11. During final precise plan approval by the City, location of Plan 1 units with skydecks shall be specified to ensure they are not abutting or adjacent to the existing units or within perimeter street image corridors (within 150-feet of street rig hts-of-ways)• P:\reports-pc\2007\11-27-07\sdp 2007-895 pc coa.doc ATTACHMENT 7 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A.Special meeting held at the La Quinta City all 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, C November 7, 2007" 10:00 a.m. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This regular meeting of the Archit tural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 0:08 a.m. by Planning Manager David. Sawyer. B. Committee Members present: Jason Arnold, Ronald Fitzpatrick, and Bill Bobbitt. C. Staff present: Planning Di ctor Les Johnson, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Management ssistant Betty Sawyer. IL PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Staff asked if here were any changes to the Minutes of October 24, 2007. The being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Committee embers Bobbitt/Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2006-895; a request of K. Hovnanian Homes for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for three prototypical residential plans for use in Tract 30092 (Piazza Serena) located at the northwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 58. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. Staff introduced John Schuller, Edinger Architects and Steve Shirrel, Landscape Development, who gave a presentation on the project and answered questions. Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee November 7, 2007 2. Committee Member Fitzpatrick asked staff to confirm the location of the additional units in regard to how they relate to the existing tract and if any energy efficient options were being offered. Mr. Schuller explained this was an infill project. and they were offering options to allow for outdoor living components. Passive components are being incorporated to the best of their ability. Committee Member Fitzpatrick asked why solar panels were not being incorporated into the project. Mr. Crandall, K. Hovnanian Homes, stated they will be using tankless water heaters, but no solar energy options are. proposed. Committee Member Fitzpatrick asked who determined the front yard turf requirement should be 50%. Staff explained this has been consistent with what the Planning Commission has recently required. Discussion followed as to how the amount of turf is determined. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt suggested that a landscape cloth be used under the decomposed granite (DG) to allow the moisture to go through and keep the DG from sinking into the soil. It will help the yard maintain its appearance longer. In regard to skydecks, they are a great idea, but when you are in a tract it allows you to look down into everyone's yard. It would be nice to lay it out so it does not allow a homeowner to look into their neighbor's yards. Mr. Crandall stated they are limited on where they can place the skydeck units. 4. Committee Member Arnold asked if the rear yard landscaping would be done before the homeowner purchases the home. Mr. Crandall stated it is an option the homebuyer can buy. Committee Member Arnold noted that in the area where there is a sideyard gate, where the trash containers are kept, they should limit the amount of plant material for access. Mr. Shirrell stated this has been an issue to allow pedestrian access to the backyards. 5. There being no further questions, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Arnold/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2007-029 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 895, as recommended. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None 9 City Of Ia Quints 79 495 Caile Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 November 26, 2007 Re: Seasonal dust control measures and related water usage. Attn: Timothy Jonasson P.E. Dear Tim: NOV 2 7 2091 `D rYOO / bAA46 I (;cite Just a note to thank you forthe time and~ wgxnded to answer my sabjectletter of concern relating to dust control and water usage I realise you nave spent a good deal of time researching the responses you have outlined. You have also supplied me with related copies of ordinances that deal with violations and corrections to dust control problems. With PM 10 plans on file and in effect, there are these options that are available to the city. This is all well and good. I believe enough time has bees spent on this issue and I do not want to take anymore city time on I However, in conclusion, I would h1w to reiterate the 2 points that I believe were paramount in my pron. First, my proposed action of immediate soil treatment was to reduce the dust from being a problem fiom the start and not have to police the eli+ected area for compliance or have to respond to the public hue and cry. In a word, pro alive and not reactive. Secondly, the use of potable water in dust control could be substantially curbed saving millions of galloce of water annmaily which is on everyone's plate. Again, in closing, I would like to thank you for your time and effort on this, my pet project. These thoughts and comments are solely mine and do not necessarily repot the Commissions collective opinion. Sincerely, Planning Commissioner CC: City Council Planning Commission Thomas Cmxiovese, City Manager Les Johnson, Planning Director Stan Sawa, This letter is in response to a notice of public hearing to be held on November 27'h 2007 at the La Quinta city Hall, Regarding permit # 2007- 895 in tracts 30092 Piazza Serena. It has come to my attention that the plans for the tract include an option for a sky deck. When I purchased in 2005 in Piazza Serena it was because RVs were not allowed and also no two story residences, and No sky decks. I had toured La Camera. Cannella and Quail Run, All had options for sky decks, I eliminated these because of this issue. I asked the sales rep for Piazza Serena at this time if they would have any two stories or sky decks now or in the future ,the answer was no. I do not choose to live in a community with the sky deck option because of privacy issues. I also have talked to the sales reps,recently,for Carmella and La Cantera and there are many buyers who object to sky decks. I feel that this is not in keeping with what was promised to the original owners in Piazza Serena and I certainly would not have purchased if a sky deck had been an option. I will leave all options open including legal recourse if sky decks are permitted in this project. Thank you John Gillette 57-730 Residenza court La Quinta Ca 92253 i I ac�I (S NOV 2 7 2001 CRY OF to QWNrA i rF'4 OF 1 V INTENT TO SPEAK FORM NOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEM: JBLIC COMMENT: RE: 3ENDA ITEM NO.: RE: JBLIC HEARING NO.: X3 RE: 11'214 Z 244 I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM I AM IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM RITTEN COMMENTS: (Optional) _EASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES WHEN SPEAKINGII ATE: �/� 71 7 4ME: f) �nesae rnnq 3DRESS: 77%d/ Li/,y i/i ETURN THIS FORM TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. iE CHAIRMAN WILL CALL YOUR NAME AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. THANK YOUI FORM.018 a�`� •rye eA OF'Ititi'� INTENT TO SPEAK FORM I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC COMMENTS: RE: AGENDA ITEM NO.: RE: PUBLIC HEARING NO.: A RE: I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM 1 AM IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM WRITTEN • •. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES WHEN SPEAKING!! DATE: 27Am-y o-7 NAME: Veo y RETURN THIS FORM TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. THE CHAIRMAN WILL CALL YOUR NAME AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. THANK YOU! PACAROLYMPianning ComVNTENT TO SPEAK FORM-doc 04 0j, c ��CFM OF Tl'945 INTENT TO SPEAK FORM 1 WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM NO.: PUBLIC HEARING NO.: RE: RE: I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM I AM IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM . WRITTEN COMMENTS: (Optional) 2 IZ4-0 IS yvr s �ccNT DELI i fi� , -fi �1Z P5 R-ZE yv u- v F w,f-T- 7DAV u PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES WHEN SPEAKING!! DATE: l 71 h)c?,Ijf Y4 60)k NAME: kv-6 01 cv(-O ADDRESS: S&-t�wfi� b2 RETURN THIS FORM TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. THE CHAIRMAN WILL CALL YOUR NAME AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. THANK YOU! P:\CAROLYN\Planning Com\INTENT TO SPEAK FORM.doc O� cF�OF TFiF'9W INTENT TO SPEAK FORM I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE FOLLOWING AG PUBLIC COMMENTS: RE: AGENDA ITEM NO.: PUBLIC HEARING NO.: RE: RE: I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM 1 AM IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM WRITTEN COMMENTS: (Optional) i ITEM: r-241elt�-IfC 641S PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES WHEN SPEAKING!! DATE / / ' : NAME:. err ADDRESS: 57 -810 0 V7-1 RETURN THIS FORM TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. THE CHAIRMAN WILL CALL YOUR NAME AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. THANK YOU! PACAROLYMPIanNng Com\INTENT TO SPEAK FORM.doc i f'M OF I ` INTENT TO SPEAK FORM MOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEM: UBLIC COMMENT: RE: _ _)0/A zz A ���✓�% 3ENDA ITEM NO.: RE: UBLIC HEARING NO.: RE: I AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM I AM IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM _7<1 RITTEN COMMENTS: vJ7om GC�st%,S'�l (�cTJDs�% .EASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES WHEN SPEAKINGII ATE: // — 97 -o 2 4ME: DDRESS: ETURN THIS FORM TO THE RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. iE CHAIRMAN WILL CALL YOUR NAME AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. THANK YOUI FORM.018