Loading...
2006 01 04 ALRCFM OF'rtt4'� �VV ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California JANUARY 4, 2006 10:00 A.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2006-001 I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call II. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes for the Regular Meetings of December 7, 2005 and October 5, 2005. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2005-845 Applicant ................ KB Home Coastal Inc. Location ................. Monroe Street between Avenue 60 & 61 Request .................. Consideration of architectural plans for three prototypical residential plan types and Clubhouse in Tract 31733 Action .................... Minute Motion 2006- ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE B. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2005-848 Applicant ................ Transwest Housing, Inc. Location ................. South side of Avenue 54, on the east side of Madison Street, north side of Greg Norman Course project, and ± 1 /4 mile west of Monroe Street Request .................. Consideration of architecture and landscaping plans for the main entry gatehouse, main entry gate and perimeter parkways, for Griffin Ranch, TT 32879. Action .................... Minute Motion 2006- C. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2005-849 Applicant ................ Colin McDermott Location ................. Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 29889 — located on the south side of Avenue 47, ±200 feet east of Washington Street Request .................. Consideration of architecture plans for a 3,400 square foot one-story office building in the La Quinta Professional Plaza (Pal Desert National Bank complex). Action .................... Minute Motion 2006- VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: Vlll. ADJOURNMENT DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Meeting of Wednesday, January 4, 2006, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post Office bulletin board. 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, December 30, 2005. DATED: Dumber 30, 2006 - tad / > YSAWYER, Ex"ecutive Secretary Ci y of Ca Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\Agenda.doc MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A Regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA, December 7, 2005 10:00 a.m. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:10 a.m. by Planning Manager Les Johnson. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Frank Christopher, and Tracy Smith. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Les Johnson, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. There being no changes to the minutes of September 7, 2005, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Smith as submitted. Unanimously approved. B. There being no changes to the minutes of October 5, 2005, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Smith as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2005-839; a request of Marchi & Associates for Wells Fargo Bank for consideration of development plans for a bank building for the property located at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Adams Street within The Pavilion at La Quinta project. 1. Principal Planner Stan . Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the GAWPDOMALM12-7-05 ALRC.doc Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee December 7, 2005 Community Development Department. Staff introduced Mr. Brett Marchi who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Smith asked if the wire trellis was welded to the building. Staff stated that based on the information submitted, it was to be attached to the building. 3. Committee Member Christopher asked the color of the trellis. Mr. Marchi stated it will be a powder coated color using an accent color. 4. Committee Member Smith asked what plant material would be used on the trellis. Mr. Marchi stated it would be a vine. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the vines noted on the plans will stick to the building without the trellis and will become a maintenance problem. Mr. Marchi stated the trellis will not be directly attached to the building, but will stand out about two feet from the building. Committee Member Bobbitt recommended a bougainvillea or calliandra vine. He also asked that the Chilean/Mesquite trees be replaced with a stronger tree. 6. Committee Member Christopher asked that the banding that runs horizontally through the stucco section be colored to give some accent. 7. Committee Member Bobbitt asked that the applicant consider adding concrete edge to the island beds so when the people exit their cars they do not step in the plant material. This would be for the area adjacent to and in front of the parking stalls 5. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2005-035 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2005-839, as recommended and as follows: a. A different vine material shall be used on the trellis b. The mesquite trees shall be misplaced with a different tree C. Contrast color shall be added to the banding that run through the stucco area. G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\12-7-05 ALRC.doc 2 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee December 7, 2005 B. Village Use Permit 2005-032; a request of Nispero Properties for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a 19,433 gross square foot two-story office building with coffee house for the property located at the northwest corner of Avenida La Fonda and Main Street in the Village at La Quinta. 1. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Steve Nieto, representing the applicant. 8. Committee Member Smith asked if the coffee bar was public or private. Mr. Nieto stated it would be public. Committee Member Smith stated his concern about the parking. Staff noted this will be addressed in a Development Agreement between the applicant and the City. Committee Member Smith asked the land use designation to the property to the north. Staff stated it is all Village Commercial uses and staff will probably require a screen wall. Committee Member Smith asked that the trees be changed to an evergreen variety along the west elevation. 9. Committee Member Christopher asked if the applicant intended to use the details noted in the samples submitted. Mr. Nieto stated it is a flavor they are trying to capture. Committee Member Christopher asked about using a hip roof for the front building and discussion followed regarding the effect of changing to the hip roof. It was determined to drop the stone work and add some of the archway features to add some detail. 5. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Smith to adopt Minute Motion 2005-036 recommending approval of Village Use Permit 2005-032, as recommended and as follows: a. Lower the stone work on the coffee house and add some arch elements. b. Change the trees on the west elevation to an evergreen variety. C. A screen wall shall be added to the west property line. d. Wrought iron railing shall be more in keeping with the hand crafted detailing in the pictured examples submitted. e. The sign monument shall be more in keeping with the fountain with the camel backing and scalloping. G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\72-7-05 ALRC.doc 3 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee December 7, 2005 C. Site Development Permit 2005-846; a request of Toll Brothers, Inc. for consideration'of architectural and landscaping plans for the property located on the north side of Avenue 58, west of Madison Street. 1. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Allen Janisch and Rick Blackshear who stated they were available to answer questions. 2. Committee Member Christopher asked if rany of the new plans will be adjacent to the existing units. Staff stated yes, but no two- story units will be permitted next to a single -story unit. 3. Committee Member Smith asked about the exterior entrances to the upstairs unit. Staff noted that when they are designed with the exterior doorway, it is considered a guest room. Committee Member Smith noted there was a stairwell directly adjacent to the driveway. Mr. Blackshear noted how you would enter the unit. Half of the staircase would be seen from the street. He rioted the Plan 2 and Plan 4 staircases can be seen from the street. 4. Committee Member Christopher asked if decorative detailing could be added to the staircase. Mr. Blackshear stated it could be added. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked staff to define what detailing that exists on the original units would not be carried over to these units. Discussion followed regarding the differences between the two elevations. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if they were exceeding any height limitations. Staff noted they are all within the height limitations. 7. Committee Member Christopher noted the Plan 2 second story has too much blank wall and something simple such as wrought iron detailing would help. Plan 1 needs something added to the risers to add detail. The applicant should be sensitive to the existing units to not construct something that is less than what is there. G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\12-7-05 ALRC.doc 4 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee December 7, 2005 8. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Smith to adopt Minute Motion 2005-037 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2005-846, as recommended and as follows: f. On some of the gable -end second story areas, additional architectural detailing shall be added. g. Decorative treatment shall be provided on Plan 2 for the staircase that faces the street. h. Railing detail shall be decorative and not a standing vertical element. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None Vill. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Christopher to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a meeting to be held on January 4, 2006. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1:00 p.m. on December 7, 2005. Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER Executive Secretary G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\72-7-05 ALRC.doc 5 0. B I #A of W Gay OF 0 ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: JANUARY 4, 2006 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2005-845 APPLICANT: KB HOME COASTAL INC. ARCHITECT: KB HOME, RIVERSIDE DIVISION & RGA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR THREE PROTOTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL PLAN TYPES AND CLUBHOUSE IN TRACT 31733, PRADO DEL SOL CIELO LOCATION: MONROE STREET BETWEEN AVENUE 60 & 61 Background: Tentative Tract Map 31733 was approved for this 38.3 ± acre property on January 20, 2004. The tract consists of 127 residential lots, a recreation lot, and common lots. The applicant is proposing three prototypical home plans with multiple variations and a clubhouse. As the project's layout, entry, walls, and landscaping are currently being redesigned, only the prototypical plans and clubhouse are requested for consideration at this time. The applicant has provided a conceptual layout and landscaping design (Attachment 1). As the recent departmental policy is to have Site Development Permits brought forward to the Planning Commission and the ALRC as a unified application, the remainder of this project will be presented to the ALRC once it becomes available. Previous plans for this site were submitted for review by Innovative Resort Communities. These plans were reviewed by the ALRC and recommended for approval. The Planning Commission rejected the plans and requested they be revised. Since then, the applicant has sold the property to KB Homes. Site Development Permit 05-842, the northern portion of this project known as Prado Del Sol Solana and Prado Del Sol Viento, was heard by the ALRC on September 7, 2005. Residential Models Proposal: The applicant has submitted prototypical architectural plans (Attachment 2) for three residential models (Prado Del Sol Cielo product line). Each of the three basic floor plan models has three architectural variations, described as Spanish, Tuscan, or Italianate. PAReports - ALRC\2006\1-4-06\SDP 05-845 KB Home CoastaRALRC SDP 2005-845 TT 31733.doc Each of those three architectural variations have an additional three color and building material variations, resulting in 27 different design combinations of what are essentially three base models. The three base models are 2,272 SF, 2,615 SF and 2,793 SF respectively. Elevations of each model will vary based on the architectural variation. The proposed Spanish style features three color combinations of brickwork, Tuscan features three varieties of veneer stonework, and Italianate utilizes three combinations of colored stucco. Accents include door and window trim, shutters, and wrought iron features. All styles utilize varied earth tone building materials including concrete "S" roof tiles. Color samples have been submitted and will be available at the meeting. Building heights range from 18' 1 1 " to 26' feet, depending on the model and particular architectural variation applied. The Tuscan and Italianate designs are generally taller than the single -story Spanish style. The three plan types are distinguished by their square footage number, identified in the lower right corner of their respective attachments. One and two story models are distinguished by the prefix 150- and 250-, respectively. For example, the 2,272 square foot, one story model, is identified as "Plan: 150.2272. Please note that plan 250.2793 has been incorrectly mislabeled as 250.2798 on the colored elevations. Clubhouse Proposal: The applicant has also provided elevations of the proposed clubhouse (Attachment 3), which will be designed to match the Tuscan style home plans, consisting of brown stucco with stone accents. The clubhouse interior will include an exercise room and a "game room" with adjacent kitchen which may be used for larger gatherings. The exterior of the clubhouse has been proposed to include a swimming pool, bocce green, putting green, and croquet lawn, though these features are for preliminary review at this time and may be subject to change pending the applicant's modifications. Conceptual Landscaping and Wall Designs for Preliminary Review: Though the applicant is not requesting a determination concerning the landscaping and wall plans at this time, they have provided some conceptual designs for reference purposes. The conceptual landscaping design features the shared use of open space with walking paths, rather than a golf course as a central focus. In most locations, landscaped open space doubles in use as retention basins. Landscaping has been designed to provide a desertscape look with the minimized use of turf. The palette and finalized layout are not yet available for review. Submitted wall and gate plans are currently under redesign. Analysis: In general, the architectural plans are designed in a size, layout, and style compatible with other residential projects in the area and each other. Despite proposing three floor plans, the variety of exterior architectural designs and color schemes compensate to 0? PAReports - ALRC\2006\1-4-06\SDP 05-845 KB Home CoastaRALRC SDP 2005-845 TT 31733.doc provide 27 different unique home variations. The plans are designed to fit the approved lots. The clubhouse design reflects the proposed "Tuscan" residential elevation. As the applicant is currently redesigning the landscaping, wall design, and overall layout of this project site, they have requested to present to ALRC only the model architectural plans for review and approval at this time. Other portions of the project site will be presented to the ALRC as they become available but, due to a recent policy change concerning Site Development Permit approvals, they will not be hearing this item until all portions of the project have been reviewed by the ALRC. The ALRC has the option of placing the review of individual aspects of the project on hold until additional portions of the application become available. Staff requests the ALRC provide direction regarding the following items: 1. Building design in relation to streetscape, distance between buildings for two- story units, and elevations. Staff recommends a typical block (or two) street elevation with alley elevation exhibit be prepared for Planning Commission consideration. Elevations, site plan and landscape plans need to be integrated into this exhibit. 2. Evaluate proposed use of building materials such as concrete versus clay tile, machine applied versus smooth plaster finishes, use of wood siding, building architectural details, appropriate application of stone veneer. 3. A preliminary evaluation concerning the proposed conceptual landscaping and project site plans. Recommendation: Recommend approval of the architectural home plans and clubhouse plans for Site Development Permit 2005-845, subject to the following: 1. The remaining items of this SDP shall be continued for ALRC review until a complete submittal including finalized interior, entry, and perimeter parkway landscaping, berm, gate, and wall plan designs are submitted. 2. Street elevation exhibits shall be revised to accurately portray the finalized landscaping design and actual setbacks. 3. Shutters and any other wood accents used on the units shall consist of a composite material. 4. Air conditioning/pool equipment cannot be located in the side yards unless five feet of clearance between equipment and property line is provided. 5. Provide a non -turf front yard landscape option for all plan types. PAReports - ALRC\2006\1-4-06\SDP 05-845 KB Home CoastaRALRC SDP 2005-845 TT 31733.doc 03 Transmitted by: An, ew J. Mogensen Associate Planner Attachments: 1. Conceptual. Landscape 2. Three Base Residential 3. Clubhouse Plans & Project Site Plan Booklet Unit Plans w/ Variations PAReports - ALRC\2006\174-06\SDP 05-845 KB Home CoastaRALRC SDP 2005-845 TT 31733.doc - - 01 ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: JANUARY 4, 2006 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2005-848 .. APPLICANT: TRANSWEST HOUSING, INC. ARCHITECT: PEKAREK CRANDELL, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: HSA DESIGN GROUP REQUEST: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR MAIN ENTY GATEHOUSE, MAIN ENTRY GATE AND PERIMETER PARKWAYS, FOR GRIFFIN RANCH, TT 32879 LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF AVENUE 54, EAST SIDE OF MADISON, NORTH SIDE OF GREG NORMAN COURSE PROJECT AND ±'/4 MILE WEST OF MONROE STREET (ATTACHMENT 1) Please review the enclosed information for the January 4 2006 ALRC meeting_ The applicant has submitted preliminary landscaping plans for the Avenue 54 and Madison Street perimeter parkway areas, and the main gatehouse structure and entry gate off of Madison Street. The applicant has stated that the clubhouse structure, unit plans, and related preliminary landscape plans for these improvements will be submitted later as part of another Site Development Permit application. The approved specific plan for Griffin Ranch includes interior streetscape, secondary gates and other minor improvements that will be reviewed as plan check items. This package includes exhibits to illustrate the proposed typical plant palette and conceptual landscape improvement layout for the main gatehouse entry, and Madison Street and Avenue 54 parkways. The landscape palettes for the parkways and main entry are identical, with variations on use of the materials listed. Several species used in the palette are not on the master palette as approved for the Griffin Ranch Specific Plan (Attachment 2). However, staff generally applies some flexibility in landscape design, and materials when dealing with specific plans, particularly where no pre- existing landscape improvements are involved. The landscape palettes presented do include a significant number of the species on the master list, and is considered acceptable. ALRCsdp848.doc Main Entry Landscaping The main entry is designed to present an equestrian -based theme when entering the project. It incorporates some desert plantings and minimal turf area, the exception being the pasture area shown to the north at Madison Street; this area is shown in the specific plan to incorporate orchard type tree stands (Attachment 3). A lake feature will extend between the main vehicular gate and the Madison Street parkway, with bridged pedestrian and vehicle access. Equestrian sculptures are shown in the water feature between both vehicular access drives. These sculptures will require review by staff for their potential as signs, and may qualify for credit under the City's Arts in Public Places requirements. A wrought -iron picket fence will be placed along the south entry boundary, with meandering sections of dry stack stone wall placed throughout the entry area. Staff suggests that the orchard tree stands shown in the approved specific plan be incorporated into the area shown as pasture, with a corresponding reduction in turf. Perimeter Landscape The perimeter landscape plans utilize the same plant palette as the main entry, and includes the required multi -purpose trail and split -rail fencing for both Avenue 54 and Madison Street, which will be constructed per the City standard for this fencing (Note: City standards provide that, where a multi purpose trail is required, a sidewalk is not necessary. However, the developer has opted to provide both the trail and sidewalk on Avenue 54). The sidewalk and trail will be separated by the split -rail fencing. Low shrubs and accents will be planted between curb and sidewalk, with decomposed granite as cover. Turf is only used in any parkway at occasional brief pockets, between the project perimeter wall and trail. There are non -recreational turfed areas at the Madison/Avenue 54 corner (shown as "pasture"), and at the secondary entries off Avenue 54 (typical shown for both entries). These preliminary plans are consistent with the specific plan concepts, and staff recommends that the turfed entry and corner areas be minimized and replaced with native materials from the palette. Main Gatehouse The main gatehouse is architecturally similar to the conceptual rendering as shown in the specific plan document (Attachment 4). The gatehouse is 511 square feet and stands at 27.5 feet to the roof peak. It includes an outdoor fireplace facing the entry (southern) side of the gatehouse. Separate finial and chimney elements extend to 30.5 feet and 32.8 feet, respectively; the chimney will need to be lowered to 31 feet, to comply with the provisions of the Zoning Code governing architectural projections. The gatehouse will be finished in smoothed stucco, raked at the gabled roof edges, with a concrete S the and exposed rafter tails. Use of stone at the front elevation is significantly reduced from the original specific plan concept, and staff would suggest that additional brick or stone accents/wainscots be incorporated. 02 ALRCsdp848.doc Entry Gate The entry gate will be located approximately 80 feet from the gatehouse and toward the project interior. The design provides dual pedestrian access gates, and two-piece swinging gates for each vehicular access drive. All gates are metal -framed wood with decorative iron bars. A fountain is designed into both sides of the wall separating the two vehicular access gates. A short wood trellis is set above each pedestrian gate, apparently intended to provide for extension of vines or other landscaping above` those gates. Carriage style light fixtures are mounted so as to flank each vehicular gate, and provide lighting for the pedestrian entries as well. The gate pilasters and wall sections will be finished in stonework, with brick and tile capping. Staff has no concerns with the gate design as proposed, and any access requirements will be addressed during staff and Planning Commission review of this Site Development Permit. The secondary entry gates off Avenue 54 will be required to be consistent in design and materials with the main entry gate as ultimately approved. The applicant will be required to present water calculations for all landscape plan improvements to show compliance with Chapter 8.13, LQMC, as a conditional requirement for Planning Commission approval. A material and color board, along with full-size color illustrations, will be provided at the January 4, 2006 ALRC meeting. Staff recommends adoption of a minute motion accepting the plans for Site Development Permit 2005-848, with a recommendation to the Planning Commission, as follows: 1 . The orchard tree stands shown in the approved specific plan exhibit for the main entry, shall be incorporated into the area shown as pasture, with a corresponding reduction in turf. 2. The turfed areas at the Avenue 54 entry and the Avenue 54/Madison Street corner shall be minimized, and replaced with native desertscape materials from the landscape palette. Secondary entry gates on Avenue 54 shall be consistent in design and materials to the main entry gate as approved under this Site Development Permit. 3. - Additional brick and/or stone accents/wainscots shall be incorporated into the front elevation for the entry gatehouse. 4. The entry gatehouse chimney shall be lowered to a maximum of 31 feet. Transmitted by: Wallace Nesbit, Associate Planner 03 ALRCsdp848.doc Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Approved Plant Palette - Griffin Ranch Specific Plan 3. Entry Concept - Griffin Ranch Specific Plan 4. Gatehouse Concept - Griffin Ranch Specific Plan ALRCsdp848.doc 01 4 ATTACHMENT 1 w w N z z O 0 V) O z � U HIGHWAY 111 DR. CARREON BLVD AVENUE 48 AVENUE 49 w N AVENUE 50 z z O 0 o AVENUE 51 lwi z U M®M ``' a L� L� Zzi — N AVENUE 52 AVENUE 53 x w W c~n AVENUE 54 w w w� >, � �� � AVENUE 55 N v z O z 0 aAIRPORT BLVD do �� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. N.T.S. -7- Griffin Ranch Specific Plan City of La Quints C TABLE 1 MASTER PLANT PALETTE Botanical Name Trees Acacia smallii Acacia salicina Acacia stenophylla Brachychiton populneus Cercidium 'Desert Musem' Cercidium floridum Cercidium praecox Chilopsis linearis `. Citrus Eucalypus microtheca Ficus retusa'Nitida' Fraxinus uhdei 'Majestic Beauty' Geijera parvifolia Jacaranda mimosifolia Lysiloma thornberi Olea Europe'Wilsoni' or'Swan Hill' Prosopis chilensis Prosopis glandulosa Quercus virginiana 'Heritage' Rhuslancea Schinus molle Thevetia peruviana Palms Brahea armata Butia capitata Chamerops humilis Cocos plumose Cycas revoluta Phoenix dactylifera Phoenix roebelenii Washingtonia hybrid Shrubs Bougainvillea '00 LA LA' Buxus microphylla japonica Caesalpina gilliesii October 7, 2004 ATTACHMENT 2, Common Name Sweet Acacia; Willow Acacia Shoestring Acacia mettle Tree Palo Verde Blue Palo Verde Sonoran Palo Verde Desert Willow Citrus Tree Coolibah Indian Laurel Fig Evergreen Ash Australian Willow Jacaranda Feather Bush Olive Texan Honey Mesquite Heritage Live Oak African Sumac California Pepper Yellow Oleander Mexican Blue Palm Pindo Palm Mediterranean Fan Palm Queen.Palm Sago Palm Da a Palm u, wu a0aw�7wt i my Date Palm c.w�r �+�y Ca 1 orma a m Shrub Bougainvillea Japanese Boxwood Mexican Bird of Paradise Page 42 of 61 �q C Griffin Ranch Specific Plan City of La Quinta Caesalpina pulcherrima Callistemon viminalis 'Little John' Red Bird of Paradise Dwarf Weeping Bottlebrush Carissa macrocarpa 'boxwood beauty' Natal Plum ` Carissa macrocarpa'Tuttlei' Natal Plum Cassia nemophila Bushy Senna Cassia phyllodenia Silver Leaf Cassia Dodonea viscosa Hopseed Bush Encelia farinosa Brittle Bush Euryops p. 'Viridis' Green -leaf Euryops Ilex vomitoria 'Stokes' Stokes Holly Justicia spicigera Mexican Honeysuckle Leucwphyllum f. 'Rio Bravo' Texas Ranger Leucophyllum f. 'Sierra Banquet' Texas Ranger Ligustrum j. 'Texanum' Texas Privet Myrtus communis 'Compacts' Dwarf Myrtle Muhlenbergia lindheimed 'Regal Mist' Deer Grass Nandina domestica 'Compacts' Compact Heavenly Bamboo Nandina domestics 'Harbor Dwarr Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo Nandina domestica 'Nana' Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo Nerium oleander'Petite Pink' Dwarf Oleander Rhaphiolepis L 'Ballerina' Indian Hawthorn Rhaphiolepis i.'Springtime' Indian Hawthorn Photinia frased Fraser's Photinia Pittosporum tobira 'Variegate' Variegated Mock Orange Pittosporum tobira 'Wheeleri' Dwarf Mock Orange Salvia g. 'Sierra Linda' Red Sage Salvia Leucantha Mexican Bush Sage Thevetia peruviana Yellow Oleander Xylosma congestum Shiny Xylosma Xylosma c. 'Compacta' Dwarf Xylosma Groundcover Annual Color Seasonal Flowers Acacia r. 'Desert Carpet' Trailing Acacia Baccharis p. 'Centennial' Coyote Bush Carissa macrocarpa 'Green Carpet' Natal Plum Dalea greggii Prostrate Indigo Bush Gazania 'Mitsua Orange' Gazania Gazania 'Mitsua Yellow' Gazania Gazania rigens leu.alaena Trailing Gazania Lantana moncevedensis Purple Prostrate Lantana Lantana m. 'New.Gold' Yellow Prostrate Lantana Rosmarinus o. 'Lockwood de Forest' Dwarf Rosemary Santolina virens Green Santolina Verbena peruviana Verbena Verbena p. 'Starfire' Verbena Verbena rigida Verbena October 7, 2004 Page 43 of 62 Griffin Ranch Specific Plan City of La Quinta U El Espaliers & Vines Bougainvillea 'Barbara Karst' Bougainvillea Bougainvillea 'Lavender Queen' Bougainvillea Calliandra inequilatera Pink Powder Puff Ficus pumila , Creeping Fig Gelsemium sempervirens Carolina Jessamine Macfadyena unguis-cati Cat's Claw Vine Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Accents Agave Americana Century Plant Aloe variegate Partridge Breast Aloe Dasylirion wheeled Desert Spoon Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca Yucca pendula Yucca October 7, 2004 Page 44 of 62 D Z m i z i ATTACHMENT 3! m — m D i � y I N "r _m m O p D 0u Na m0 5 0 m �>p � � � = 7 m m N EXHIBIT 25 if MSA CONSULTING, INC Mummo. Sum a AssmAm Itx Main Entry A& =� BI #C 04 �� QUM& of ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: JANUARY 4, 2006 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2005-849 APPLICANT: COLIN McDERMOTT ARCHITECT: PREST VUKSIC ARCHITECTS REQUEST: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR A 3,400 S.F. ONE-STORY OFFICE BUILDING IN THE LA QUINTA PROFESSIONAL PLAZA (PALM DESERT NATIONAL BANK COMPLE)O LOCATION: PARCEL 2 OF PM 29889 - SOUTH SIDE OF AVENUE 47, ±200 FEET EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET (ATTACHMENT 1) Please review the attached information for the January 4, 2006 ALRC meeting. The proposed project involves development of a site comprising 0.47 acres, with a one-story general office building of 3,400 square feet. The building is just below 22 feet at its highest point. This proposed building incorporates the general architectural theme set forth in the approved La Quinta Professional Plaza Specific Plan, and is consistent with the design of other buildings previously approved and completed within this complex. All on -site parking and access ways for the entire center were constructed with Phase 1 improvements, in accordance with the approved Specific Plan 2000-049. This building is on the last pad site, and will complete the center. In regard to landscaping, the entire parking area, on -site circulation and major landscape components were installed with Phase 1 and during construction of the other buildings in the complex. As with the other buildings for this complex, the landscape improvements associated with this building are limited to infill of peripheral area and surrounds of the building itself. The tree species to be used are consistent with the Specific Plan palette, with exception of the Chilean Mesquites and the one African Sumac tree. While the shrub and accent palette specified for the project is well designed, it does not include species from the approved specific plan palette, and does not conform to the, existing landscape environment for the project. Staff suggests that the applicant replace some species with comparable approved species from the specific plan palette (Attachment 2). Staff recommends adoption of a minute motion accepting the plans for Site Development Permit 2005-849, with a recommendation to the Planning Commission, as follows: ALRCsdp849.doc 1. Replace Chilean Mesquites with Argentine Mesquites. 2. Revise the plant palette to replace at least two shrub and two accent species with species from the approved plant palette for Specific Plan 2000-049, which are selected to be compatible with existing landscaping employed throughout the Specific Plan area for the La Quinta Professional Plaza. Transmitted by: Wallace Nesbit, Associate Planner Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Approved Specific Plan plant palette 02 ALRCsdp849.doc !0 30L Sl� ATTACHMENT 1 —/ T.R.A.020-042.. _ S / T.R.A. 020 024 200.93 , O9 u m' PM192/93 A V PAR.8 y u PARR ,oho O , 206.33 0 3.20 AC NT fim -4 SHRUBS TO PARKCVO -------------- LA QUKrA SHADE REQUREMENTS 'ATTACHMENT 2 FOR PARKING AREAS .. • a swam of bm or pukrg area moat ba "es" Tool area of parking *tall* 32425 6% tL of teal • ,ode coverage by tree* eon *% It.. 26 % • Node eeverage b5 Carport Iee61 aq. rL al % - pereantaga able to vaunt For rewsramar" 25 et Tool pe eanage or parkkrg Bulb "Clod 511 a PALM TRMS GROUP Pas i rorraa.A FOR CALCu.AlrM TREE 69AM CovERAW area or Mode from a MI c tsrets tree . 450 *q. R N, * or tree, that provide H2 ehede eovarage In *tall& 52 X 245 *% fu r~ *h R Brea or ands from a m' dbmnter Yee • 254 6% R N. • or tram tut provsdo Va Meld covsa a In *tall& 2 X QT sc • M 254 a% R area at nude from a is, duvets Yee • m aq. R K * of tram itat ovlde to shads oov a In atail& 6 X a05 0% rL 551 sq. R caul arm of *ode M parkvo 6625 •q. tt PLANT LEGEND Tr n Sgmbol Sclontlfkt None Common Nome plant Sire prosopls obo Argentine mesquite ZrARX %'-Box Jeeo'anda r nomtollo Jouvonda SehvLe molle ColHornla popper tree 56'/4D'-Box Bractgalton popkiam Bottle tree 24'-6ox A4mlo solktrw Wottle 24•/56-Box Tpuoro Tpu Tlpu Troo 24•/56-Box oar... _ _ l 9Gentiflc Name Common Name - pion SYA Phoenix doe IN ero WaehkxJionla robuato Date lm pa MexkArl ►an paten 24•/96'-Box Chomaeraps humllb t4editemorwcn lam kn kt I I eckom Name Common Nome PlantSize LI strum J. Toxax+m' Japanese pNvet 5-601 1pbisom rasa-shamis ChNese hbbew 15-601 podoraeo vows* Hopbu*h 5.601 O Ilea 'ao Lo La nvlllea 5-601 Gorlsse Boxweocl Boxwood Be 5-601 Nandkw domestk4 Heaven bamboo 5-sol loew stem losma - 5-601 tlorbm olemdor olsonder 5-601 o InHlom Twkr-lowered a 5-601 �1°i^Ad a �. • _ _ - - -94w"l Sewalo NOW Common Name IVIVAthe SIM BougalrMlloo 9 Komt' BougokMlloo 15-601 asp. Callw4-o Noequllotern Pink put/ I5-601 esp. " Amrol Dolor Seosawl 6tts. 6' 0.0. LoAtcm New bold' Now bold lontono I-eale 5' oz. w fn L ntorontovkwmis Purple kanlomo 1-6010 5' oz. r� Joekre wAtoo 1-6ais 5' ozI 1 Bmgohvllloc rosenka eklvllloo 5-6 1& V DA. 90D M Borma DD Deser 6ok2 2' depth In all plor"m Desert Rock and 5upp 2'-5' dlo. 'Crest,' EWuWAm N Desert Rock and SuPP19