Loading...
2006 06 07 ALRC0 0 4 OF ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE rNflFSTLI-01"T A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California JUNE 7, 2006 10:00 A.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2006-020 101-111 M 116x01;1R1:4;1 A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call IL PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Ill. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes for the Regular Meeting of May 3, 2005. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-861 Applicant ................ Villa Sienna, L.L.C. Location ................. Northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE Request .................. Consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for five prototypical residential plans for use in Tract 32225. Action .................... Minute Motion 2006- V1. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: Vill. ADJOURNMENT This meeting of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee will be adjourned to a Regular Meeting to be held on July 5, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. DECLARATION OF POSTING 1, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Regular Meeting of Wednesday, June 7, 2006, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post Office bulletin board. 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, June 2, 2006. DATED: June 2, 2006 L;�BEWYER, Executive Secretary BET AZn City of La Quinta, California P:\CAROLYN\ALRC\Agenda.doc BI #A OF 4 DATE: CASE NO: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 7, 2006 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-861 VILLA SIENNA, L.L.C. STEVEN DECHRISTOHER TOM EDGEMONT, TBNC CONSIDERATION OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR FIVE PROTOTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL PLANS FOR USE IN TRACT 32225 NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET This 8.08 acre property, with a total 28 residential lots, is located on the north side of Avenue 58, west of Madison Street (Attachment 1). Tentative Tract 32225 was approved for this property on October 19, 2004. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Architectural Plans The applicant has submitted prototypical plans for five residential model units (Attachment 2). Five different floor plans are proposed and vary in size from 2,351 to 3,470 square feet. Four of the five elevations are a Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style while the fifth style is Desert Contemporary. The elevations identify all buildings to be one story and vary in height from 14'-8" to 18'-10" with chimneys and entry towers as high 20'-8". Plan 1 is proposed to be built at the end of each of the cul-de-sacs. Plan 2 has an open courtyard on the side of the residence. Plans 4 and 5 have courtyards in the front, with Plan 4 proposing an optional casita. All plans propose swimming pools located in either the front or rear yards. Proposed exterior plaster and trim colors are light to dark earth tones with red/brown blends of concrete "S" roof tile. Elevation 4 has a contemporary pewter and grey tone color option with color compatible flat concrete tile over the front entry element. Elevations will utilize stone veneer wainscoting, decorative rosettes, and lantern style lights. PAReports - ALRC\2006\6-7-06\SDP 2006-861 ALRC rpt - Santerra.doc Garage doors are proposed to be sectional wood stained to match the units. Material and color samples and color schemes have been submitted and will be available at the meeting. Landscape Plan In conformance with staff comments, the Landscape Plan plant schedule has been modified to reflect all trees being a minimum 24 inch box. The tree type has been changed from Crape Myrtles to Marina Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo) and St. Mary's Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora). The plant schedule has also been modified to reflect all shrubs being a minimum 5 gallon sized containers. The specific tree and shrub call outs on the plans still need to be modified to reflect these changes; however, the plant schedule is correct. Also, portions of the landscape plan identify hand written notes from the applicant to identify changes that will be made in response to staff comments. Access to the project will be from Madison Street with vehicles having right -in, right - out, and left —in movement. Median landscaping is proposed to be consistent with City median planting, watering and site distance guidelines. The revised tree and shrub plant schedule will be used for specific plant types and size call outs if the existing median and its existing landscaping are required to be disturbed as a result of the final street and median design. The perimeter wall proposes use of two different materials emphasizing a more simplified contemporary design. At the main entry gate, a 6-foot high stucco finished block wall is proposed in sections with brown/red tone colors which transition in tone. At the corner of Avenue 58 and Madison and at the main entry corners, the sectional wall is staggered with four inch openings. Masonry slump block is proposed for the remainder (majority) of the perimeter on Avenue 52 and Madison Street. Material for the main vehicle and pedestrian entry gates are proposed to be stainless steel with view through mesh; and in line with the gate are square metal poles in the landscape setback. Proposed in the center median of the main entry gate is an "iconic" 14'-3" high entry stuccoed monument topped with a copper ribbed roof. The entry monument is proposed to have ornamental lighting and a water feature around a landscape planter. Two additional landscape planters are proposed within the median. The driveway will be constructed with tumbled and random paver stones to help define the entry. The larger planter area consists of natural slab stone and flowers. The slab stone is proposed to be used for a future monument sign; however, the proposed sign "Santerra" is not a part of this application process. Common area and perimeter landscaping and wall plans are also proposed. Perimeter landscaping along Madison Street and a landscaped retention basin along Avenue 52 consists of 24 inch box Palo Verde, Marina, St. Mary, and Tipu Tress along with a variety of desert shrubs and aggregate ground cover with no turf. The applicant is proposing a natural soils condition for portions the bottom of the retention basin with a decomposed granite walking trail and three exercise stations. P:\Reports - ALRC\2006\6-7-06\SDP 2006-861 ALRC rpt - Santerra.doc Preliminary typical landscaping plans have been submitted for each of the five model plans. Typical front yard landscaping plans include a minimum of three 24 inch box trees, 5 gallon shrubs, and decomposed granite in the shrub beds with no turf. Plant materials identified are low water users and typically used in the desert. ISSUES: The project as presented is designed well and complies with applicable zoning requirements. Staff has the following concerns: The use of Crape Myrtles as called out for each plant location has been discouraged in residential settings because it is deciduous and suggests long term maintenance issues; applicant has proposed to change the Crape Myrtle to Marina and St. Mary trees as reflected in the plant schedule. Staff is requesting ARLC to evaluate as staff is not familiar with these tree species. The use of natural soils in the bottom of the retention basin presents a dust and potential maintenance issue. Staff is recommending decomposed granite. The stainless steel gates will be too reflective in the bright sun; staff suggests the all stainless steel be bonderized or an alternate non-flextive material. The proposed perimeter masonry slump block wall presents a long linear image and needs to have visual relief; staff is recommending pilasters be added at each property line and or at wall height changes occurring as a result of finished grade changes on Madison Street and Avenue 58. Similar pilaster spacing along Avenue 52 is needed along Madison Street. Trees in the original landscape plans were identified as 15 gallon containers which are not an adequate size. All tress in the parkway and retention area need to be a minimum 24 inch box and 1.5 inch caliper size. Ornamental lighting is proposed for the entry monument; staff is recommending a Condition of Approval to provide a detail for staff review and approval for all exterior light fixtures. Adequate shrub massing and design for landscape parkway on Madison Street and Avenue 52 to provide for a variety of heights and provide visual relief of the perimeter wall massing. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of architectural and landscape plans for Site Development Permit 2006-861, subject to the following conditions: 1 Delete all Crape Myrtle trees from plant palette and provide St. Mary's and Marina trees as a substitute; modify all sheets of the landscape plan to reflect the changes. PAReports - ALRC\2006\6-7-06\$DP 2006-861 ALRC rpt - Santerra.doc 2. Provide decomposed granite in place of the natural soils in the retention basin. 3. All stainless steel material used for the perimeter wall and gates shall be bonderized. 4. All trees in the parkway and retention area shall be a minimum 24 inch box and 1.5 inch caliper; modify all sheets of the landscape plan to reflect the changes. 5. Provide a custom design or cut sheet detail for the all exterior light fixtures including the entry tower feature. All exterior perimeter lighting shall be approved by the Community Development Director. 6. The six foot perimeter wall height shall be measured from the finished grade of the residential lots. 7. Final median design including landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. 8. A separate sign permit is required for the monument sign. 9. The copper roof on the entry monument shall be treated to speed up the patina process. 10. The perimeter wall shall have pilasters installed at residential property lines or 100 foot maximum. Pilasters shall accommodate all wall height transitions. 11. Shrub massing along the perimeter parkways shall be reviewed by the Architecture Landscape Review Committee and the amended final perimeter landscaping plan shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Transmitted by: Fred Baker, AICP Principal Planner Attachments: 1 . Location Map 2. Plan Exhibits P:\Reports - ALRC\2006\6-7-06\SDP 2006-861 ALRC rpt - Santerra.doc (� , 4 Attachment 1 VICINITY MAP NTS 1)1�j MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A Regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 3, 2006 10:00 a.m. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:05 a.m. by Planning Manager Les Johnson. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Frank Christopher, and Tracy Smith. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Les Johnson, Principal Planners Stan Sawa, Fred Baker and Wally Nesbit, Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. 11. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. Ill. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Committee Member Smith asked that Page 2 be corrected. There being no other corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Smith/Christopher to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2004-809, Amendment No. 1; a request of Innovative Communities, Inc. for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a revision to the existing approval for a clubhouse facility, associated with Watermark Villas for the property located at the northwest corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Principal Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Mr. Brad Fornan who introduced the project architect and landscape architect who gave a presentation on the project. r �Wpnnrq�aj Rr��-q-nA nnr Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee May 3, 2006 2. Committee Member Christopher asked if the density had been changed with this amendment. Staff stated no; the only changes were to the clubhouse. Committee Member Christopher asked why the cartbarn was eliminated. Mr. Fornan stated the parking was reduced as it was originally open to the public. Committee Member Christopher asked if the gym facility would be capable of handling all the residents at buildout. Mr. Fornan stated it was designed to accommodate the membership. Committee Member Christopher asked how many units would be built. Staff stated 250 units. 3. Committee Member Smith asked the purpose of the mulch. The project landscape architect stated it was to be used where the citrus trees are being used. The material would not be wood chips but a DG or a gravel material. Committee Member Smith said he had no objection to the plant list. 4. Committee Member Christopher asked if the trellis material would be pressure treated glu-lam or non -wood material. Mr. Fornan stated it would not be wood. 5. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2006-016 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2004-809, Amendment No. 1, as recommended and as amended: a. Entrance trellis shall be pressure treated beams or non - wood material. b. The mulch material shall be DG or gravel Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2003-775; a request of Bill Sanchez, Jack Tarr Development for consideration of architectural plans for retail shops located south of Highway 111, west of Adams Street, within Washington Park. 1 Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Bill Sanchez, who gave a presentation on the project. r4 IIA/Pnnrq�Al Pr\R_I_nA nnr 2 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee May 3, 2006 2. Committee Member Christopher asked if the ALRC could make a recommendation on the entire site. The building that is closest to Adams Street, the utility access would abutt Adams Street and does not have adequate landscaping. It is aesthetically not pleasant. Mr. Sanchez stated they will be increasing the landscaping within the next two weeks. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt also stated his concern about how close the buildings are to the Adams Street. Discussion followed regarding the plant material that would be used. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the rear of the building needs to be dressed up. 4. Committee Member Christopher asked that additional landscaping be used between the office building and this building. Staff stated they are required to add landscaping. Mr. Sanchez noted some areas where popouts or trellis treatments could be added. 5. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Smith to adopt Minute Motion 2006-017 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-859, as recommended and amended: a. Additional popout detail or trellis treatment shall be added to the rear of the building. Unanimously approved. C. Site Development Permit 2006-859; a request of Michael J. Shovlin & William Case, Project Manager for consideration of architectural and conceptual landscaping plans for two retail shops and tenant storage within the One Eleven La quitna Center for the property located at the northwest corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. 1 Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Carl Cox, architect, and William Casey, Director of Construction who gave a presentation on the project. r 1AA/Pnnrq�A1 Pr�9-1-ng nnr 3 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee May 3, 2006 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the purpose of the building. Mr. Cox explained and discussion followed regarding the building layout. 3. Committee Member Christopher asked if the area between this building and the Legacy Furniture building was large enough to support landscaping. Staff discussed the width of the area between the buildings and stated there was enough area to add some landscaping. 4. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Smith to adopt Minute Motion 2006-018 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-859, as recommended. Unanimously approved. D. Specific Plan 99-035, Amendment No. 1; a request of East of Madison, LLC. for consideration of Avenue 52 perimeter wall plans adjacent to the Reception Center/Guard House along Avenue 52 and Meriwether Way, within the Madison Club. 1 Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Cynthia Zamorez, Madison Club, and Scott Birdwell, Discovery Land Co., who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Christopher asked what material would be used for the cap on the enhanced wall. Mr. Birdwell stated it would be Masonry with an ornamental detail that turns back to the wall. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the color of wall. Ms. Zamorez explained the detail and stated the color should be a beige. 4. Committee Member Christopher suggested they use the foam stick -on detail for the top of the "standard" wall. Mr. Birdwell stated they intended to just do a rounded grouted finish instead of a cap. r Mtpnnrq�ai PriR-i-nR nnr 4 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee May 3, 2006 5. Committee Member Bobbitt questioned the species of trees proposed and discussion followed. 6. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2006-016 recommending approval of Specific Plan 99-035, Amendment No. 1, as recommended. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None Vill. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on June 7, 2006. This meeting was adjourned at 11:03 a.m. on May 3, 2006. Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER Executive Secretary r-1WPnnrqiAi Pr�R-q-nA nnr 5