1992 05 06 DRB Minutes
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CITY OF LA QUINT A
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California
May 6, 1992
5:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Vice Chairman Harbison brought the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. and
Boardmember Rice led the flag salute. Vice Chairman Harbison asked for a roll
call.
n. ROLL CALL
A. Present: Boardmembers John Curtis, Fred Rice, Paul Anderson, Planning
Commission Representative Elison, and Vice Chairman Harbison. Absent:
Chairman Llewellyn. It was moved by Boardmember Anderson and seconded by
Boardmember Rice to excuse Chairman Llewellyn from the meeting.
Unanimously approved.
B. Staff present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa and Department Secretary Betty
Anthony
m. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Plot Plan 92-484: a request to develop a small take out pizza restaurant at 79-080
Calle Estado on 0.12 acres in the Commercial Village "The Core" Zone District.
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa stated that this item would be continued to
the next meeting at the request of Staff.
B. Conditional Use Permit 92-003; a request for approval of plans for a three story
medical office building on five acres in the C-P-S Zone at the northeast comer
of 48th Avenue and Washington Street.
1.
Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the
Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development
Department.
DRBMS/6
1
Design Review Board Minutes
May 6, 1992
2. Boardmember Rice asked where the church and the other approved
medical complex were in relation to the project. Staff stated to the north
was the Desert Hospital project, to the south was the Pyramids, to the east
was Lake La Quinta, and to the west was vacant land.
3. Boardmember Curtis asked if a master plan had been submitted for the
entire area and if the entire project would be medical. Staff stated that
they had not received a complete site plan for the project but Staffs
understanding was that it would be medical or medical/office/retail.
3. Planning Commission Representative Ellson asked if the buildings had
been leased. Staff stated they understood it was in the process.
4. Boardmember Rice stated his objection to the architecture of the building
and he strongly felt he could not support the project as submitted. He felt
it resembled Stouffers Esmeralda and that was not the theme of La Quinta.
5. Mr. Paul Senzaki, Jerde Partnership, representing the applicant, gave a
brief presentation of the project and introduced Mr. Charles Pigg of Jerde
Partnership who gave a detailed presentation of the project.
6. Vice Chairman Harbison stated he felt the building was too geometric.
Discussion followed concerning the look of the building in regards to its
location. Most board members felt it did not represent the look of La
Quinta.
7. Boardmember Curtis stated his concern that enough detail was not given
to the Washington Street side of the building.
8. Boardmember Anderson stated he felt the design had broken the size down
and to add a tile roof would be detrimental to the design. He did not feel
you could get the Village look out of a building this size. Discussion
followed again relative to what type of look La Quinta wanted.
9. Planning Commission Representative Ellson agreed that the look needed
to be more Spanish and the color needed to softened.
10. Vice Chairman Harbison stated the detailing on the windows and doors
needed to show more enhancement.
11. Boardmember Anderson again stated the Board's objection to the large flat
walls of the structure. He felt the City could and should encourage a
DRBM5/6 2
Design Review Board Minutes
May 6, 1992
variety of architecture.
12. Boardmember Curtis felt the architecture should be given more detail, but
felt the layout of the building should be altered and more attention given
to the Washington Street side.
13. Mr. Senzaki asked the Board to give them direction regarding what they
were looking for. Planning Commissioner Ellson stated the roofline
needed to be more broken up and softer colors.
14. Following discussion it was moved by Boardmember Curtis and seconded
by Boardmember Anderson to recommend approval of the project subject
to the building being resubmitted to Staff with the following revisions:
a. Softer colors.
b. Soften the rectangular architecture possibly (with Pueblo-type
archi tecture).
c. Attention is given to the roofline to break it up.
d. Reduce the solid mass and give more detail to the architecture.
e. Soften the block wall arcade.
f. Put more interest to the west elevation.
On a roll call vote it was approved unanimously approved with Chairman
Llewellyn being absent. 'f,..z . .> " ' "
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Vice Chairman Harbison asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of
March 4, 1992. Boardmember Rice asked that a note regarding his insulating
glass handout be added to the minutes. Boardmember Curtis moved to approve
the Minutes as corrected. Boardmember Rice seconded the motion and it carried
unanimously.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Boardmember Anderson and seconded by Boardmember Rice to adjourn to a
regular meeting of the Design Review Board on June 3, 1992, at 5:30 P.M. This meeting of
the La Quinta Design Review Board was adjourned at 6:50 P.M., May 6, 1992.
DRBMS/6
3