Loading...
2001 03 07 ALRC Minutes MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Guinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Guinta, CA March 7, 2001 10:00 a.m. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:06 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di Iorio who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham, Bill Bobbitt, and Frank Reynolds. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of February 7, 2001. Committee Member Reynolds asked that Page 4, Item #8 be corrected to read, " ...what the depth of the windows would be." There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Reynolds/Bobbitt to approve the minutes as corrected. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2001-686; a request of Omri Siklai, for review of development plans for a commercial buildings consisting of a restaurant and office, located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Lake La Guinta Drive. 1. Principal Planner Stan Saw a presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. G,\ WPDOCSIALRC3-7-01. wpd 1 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes March 7, 2001 2. Mr. Omri Siklai stated they had no objections to staff's recommendations. Mr. Lew Bishop, architect for the project, made a presentation. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that being contemporary in style it almost has a Frank Geary look and most buildings currently in the City are Spanish or Spanish Revival, how does this fit in with the surrounding architecture? Staff stated the City does not have any design guidelines requiring a Spanish design. Recently the La Ouinta Court was approved with a different architectural style. Each specific plan defines its own look. The Church and the La Ouinta Inn each stand on their own. Committee Member Bobbitt stated there are not a lot of structures in this area currently and it is hard to determine what it will look like with the different styles. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated he has been a proponent of the Spanish architecture as exemplified by the La Ouinta Hotel, and the Von's Plaza. That would have been a good guideline for the City, but the City did not adopt those guidelines and now we have some buildings that are not attractive. There are some new projects however, that are bringing in some new designs such as the La Ouinta Court and Point Happy. The City Hall itself created a lot of controversy. This design is dynamic and does tie into the City Hall design and the La Ouinta Court and will be a signature building. 5. Committee Member Reynolds asked what would be built on the adjoining property to tie in with this. 6. Committee Member Cunningham stated that as this is the first building in this area, it will set the precedent for the next project. 7. Committee Member Reynolds stated the only access to the project is from Caleo Bay and with the low lighting on the parking lot it could be a concern for mischief and the applicant might want to consider more light. Mr. Bishop stated they want the low level lighting. The taller lights will be in the same place as the tree tops so they lowered the lights down to be below the trees which creates an ambient feeling. Committee Member Reynolds stated it will be difficult for law enforcement to see into the parking lot with the low level lighting and landscaping. The applicant stated this is in conflict with the City's standards which requiring the lush landscaping and no access off Washington Street. r..\wpn()r~\AT .R~1-7-01.wnd 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes March 7, 2001 8. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the idea was to bring the vehicles in an understated way with the building attracting attention. Mr. Bishop stated yes. 9. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he likes the way the project is set out and the landscaping is great. The building is a good looking building and his concern was only that it would not fit in and after the discussion, he is satisfied with the design. Mr. Bishop stated that a community that bridges more than one style is the essence of America. Their concept was to have a collective mix with the proposed Arts Foundation, Church and other surrounding businesses. 10. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the metal would be left in its natural state to weather. The applicant stated yes. Committee Member Cunningham stated that with the way it is done with the marble and landscaping, it is a fresh design. If used correctly it is a beautiful statement, but it may need to be defended as some people do not like it. 11 . Committee Member Bobbitt stated he would like to see some low level planting to soften the look on the north and east elevations. 12. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Reynolds adopt Minute Motion 2001-011 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-686, subject to the conditions. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Reynolds/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a special meeting to be held on March 21, 2001. This meeting was adjourned at 10:42 a.m. on March 7, 2001. 4Rese.e,ctfullY SUb~)tted, .// d~ki Xatd~t<---- , / )'/J':?AWYER, Executive Secretary City ona Quinta, California G:\ WPDOCS\ALRC3-7-0 I.wpd 3