2001 10 18 HPC Minutes
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Ouinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Ouinta, CA
Octocer 18, 2001
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman
Maria Puente at 3:02 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call.
Present:
Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman
Puente. Unanimously approved.
Staff Present:
Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn
Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to
approve the Minutes of September 20, 2001 as submitted. Unanimously
approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Point Haoov Ranch Proiect
Area: a request for approval of the Phase I Cultural Resources
investigation of a 43 acre parcel of property located on the west side of
Washington Street, approximately 300 feet south of Highway 111.
Applicant: Point Happy Ranch, LLC - Archaeological Consultant:
McKenna Et AI (Jeanette A. McKenna, Principal).
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
P:\CAROL YNlHPCI 0-18-0 l.wpd
-1-
Historic Preservation Connnission Minutes
October 18, 200 I
2.
Commissioner Mitchell
recommendations.
concurred
with
the
staff's
3. Commissioner Wright stated he was in favor of staff's
recommendations but thought the site should be monitored during
any kind of excavation.
4. Commissioner Irwin also supported staff's recommendations but
was concerned about monitoring the site and preservation of
certain trees that are a part of Point Happy's history. She also
pointed out Attachment #1, Page 004, had the wrong map. She
added one of the buildings, on that property, was the first air-
conditioned building in the Valley and the entrance itself, is
historic.
5. Commissioner Wright stated it was in the City of La Quinta's
Historic Primary Record. He added most of the buildings were
dilapidated but still had historical significance as well as the entry
way gates. When the Commission looked at the Tradition project
they were very emphatic about every saveable building. As a
result the garages near the Hacienda were saved. He suggested
the staff report recommend every structure be looked at on its
own historic merit. This project should be handled the same way
Tradition was handled, including saving historic trees, especially
since planting citrus was tried there for the first time, as well as
experiments with growing cotton.
6. Commissioner Sharp stated he wasn't as familiar with the property
as the other Commissioners but he does know Louise Neeley and
he did know Alice Marble. According to the staff report photos
there did not appear to be much worth saving. There was some
good ironwork and it would be nice if it was incorporated
somewhere in the project.
7. Chairman Puente asked if the applicant would like to address the
Commissioners' concerns.
8. Archaeological Consultant McKenna pointed out Happy Lunbeck
owned a larger parcel than what was included in this project and
this portion did not have sugar cane, nor cotton.
P:\CAROL YNlHPClO-18-01.wpd
-2-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
9. Commissioner Irwin replied the Historical Society had photographs
which showed these crops being cultivated on this property.
Archaeological Consultant McKenna asked if they were grown in
this specific area. Commissioner Irwin answered yes.
Archaeological Consultant McKenna stated she was not aware of
this information while conducting her study. She used what
information was provided. The original property was considerably
larger, but this portion did not show any physical evidence of that
type of activity.
10. Commissioner Irwin stated the road that goes up over the hill was
once part of the stage line.
11. Archaeological Consultant McKenna agreed but stated the stage
stop itself, was not on the property.
12. Commissioner Irwin stated it was at Indian Wells, across the
street. She added the Cultural Report referred to Happy Lunbeck,
while the staff report did not. Point Happy Ranch started in 1920
and got its name from Happy Lunbeck.
13. Archaeological Consultant McKenna stated Point Happy, as the
date farm, assumed the name. It wasn't called Point Happy Date
Farm.
14. General discussion followed regarding the reference to Point
Happy Ranch versus Point Happy Date Farm and the fact that the
project property had become commonly known as Point Happy
Ranch.
15. Commissioner Irwin asked who was contacted at the Historical
Society.
16. Archaeological Consultant Jeanette A. McKenna stated she had
spoken with Mrs. Louise Neeley, who was born and raised on the
Point Happy property and she also referred them to another
gentlemen who contributed the name of a third individual. That
was why a recommendation was made in the report, that an Oral
History needed to be prepared on this property.
P:\CAROL YNlHPClO-18-01.wpd
-3-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
17. Commissioner Wright stated his number one concern was
preserving the structures that were deemed historic. They needed
to be integrated into the project the same way the Hacienda was
integrated into Traditions.
1 B. Principal Planner Sawa introduced the applicant's representative,
Mr. Robert Sundstrom. He stated Point Happy LLC started
working on the project approximately two-and-a-half years ago at
which time they began looking into the history of the Ranch and
the historical nature of anything that was still remaining. They
went through a private assessment, filed an initial study and
started the public process to have the City determine those
buildings that potentially had any historical value in the site
planning process. He added they did recognize there were a lot of
significant trees in the project and did have an arborist do a
complete count of every tree, every tree species, the nature of the
tree, the condition of every tree, and the type of tree. The
instructions given to the arborist were to look at the trees for
condition, age, and the possibility of relocation on site and
utilization within the project itself. It was the applicant's intent to
reconstruct, or recreate, a date garden feel utilizing as many of
the taller trees as possible. They would relocate the date palms
that were in condition to be relocated. Their original assessment
did not find any buildings that were of strict historical nature that
could be either preserved or relocated on the property. A lot of
the design criteria in this project relates to the Ranch, its history,
the utilization of the ironwork throughout the project, and the
installation of citrus in keynote areas to create the idea that this
was a ranch and an operating citrus and date grove. The current
plan does not incorporate any of the existing buildings. The only
building that is currently proposed to be retained is "the Dupont
House". The bulk of the houses have considerable structural
deficiencies. He then offered to answer any questions.
19. Commissioner Sharp asked if the name of the project would be
Point Happy, as it was an important landmark to the community.
20. Mr. Sundstrom answered the project was named "The Pointe at
Point Happy Ranch". This was done to differentiate this project
from the commercial project "Point Happy" on Highway 111.
P:\CAROL YN\HPCIO-18-01. wpd
-4-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 200 I
21. Commissioner Sharp asked a question about the width of the
entrance gate.
22. Mr. Sundstrom replied he had always been intrigued by the
ironwork at the entryway gate. However, as the entryway was
now it did not meet the current standards for the Fire Department.
The new entryway/wall would be designed to emulate the wall
and the fencing with the archway while meeting Fire Department
standards.
23. Commissioner Sharp asked if there was a drawing of the building
and landscape plans available and what type of architecture would
be utilized.
24. Mr. Robert Sundstrom apologized that he did not have any large
drawings with him.
25. Commissioner Wright asked why the Oral History was to be done
by the Morongo Basin Historical Society, not the La Ouinta
Historical Society. He commented the Oral History should be
done by the La Ouinta Historical Society.
26. Chairman Puente asked if any of the remaining structures were in
good condition.
27. Mr. Sundstrom replied no.
28. Chairman Puente asked what the possibility was to save or
relocate them.
29. Mr. Sundstrom replied, in their assessment, the remaining
buildings served no useful purpose from a historical point and
therefore not incorporated into the site plan. There were a series
of assessments done, but the only building to be shown of
significance was the old school house which is no longer on the
property. It has been the applicant's intent to incorporate the
history of the Date Gardens, into the landscaping theme and
incorporate the feel of the Date Gardens into the project itself.
30. Commissioner Irwin stated the La Ouinta Historical Society had
the City of La Ouinta Curation Standards. She stated she was
surprised to find an oral history project from the Morongo Basin
Historical Society in the report directing all the information and
P:\CAROL YN\HPCI O-18-01.wpd
-5-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18,2001
photographs to them. She then asked Principal Planner Sawa why
this request was in the back of the report since the City already
had standards in place. She added the City was building a state-
of-the-art facility and would be one of the few cities in Southern
California to have such a facility. She wondered why another
facility would be involved.
31. Principal Planner Sawa replied this may have been a
recommendation in the report, but the City would have changed
it to read the La Ouinta Historical Society.
32. Commissioner Wright suggested a condition be added requiring
the Oral History to be prepared in cooperation with the La Ouinta
Historical Society.
33. Commissioner Irwin stated if somebody else wanted to participate
in the Oral History, they could work with the La Ouinta Historical
Society .
34. Archaeological Consultant McKenna commented the Oral History
needed to be done in a fashion that was consistent with what had
already been done.
35. Commissioner Irwin questioned the use of the Morongo Basin
Historical Society.
36. Archaeological Consultant McKenna replied she had nothing in her
report making that suggestion.
37. Commissioner Irwin directed the Commission to the back of the
report.
38. Archaeological Consultant McKenna said it had been appended by
someone other than herself. She only stated that the Oral History
needed to be done.
39. Principal Planner Sawa thought the attachment was meant only as
an example of what an oral history program would look like, and
it should have been marked as a sample.
40. Commissioner Wright stated the concern was any material, oral
history, photographs, derived from the Oral History, would become
the property of the City of La Ouinta. He suggested another
P:\CAROLYN\HPCl 0-1 8-01.wpd -6-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
condition be added reqUiring collected materials become the
property of the City of La Quinta per the adopted standards of
curation.
41. Mr. Sundstrom asked if Oral Histories were privately prepared.
42. Commissioner Irwin answered she didn't know if they were done
privately, but several Historical Societies in the Valley were
currently working on Oral Histories.
43. Mr. Sundstrom stated he was more concerned with the format of
the report meeting with City's standards.
44. Chairman Puente suggested a correction be made to this report
stating the Oral History form be identified as an example of an
Oral History.
45. Commissioner Irwin asked Mr. Sundstrom to indicate where the
ironwork would be placed.
46. Mr. Sundstrom gave a summary of the project and the proposed
site of the trees and ironwork.
47. Commissioner Sharp asked how many apartments would be in the
development.
48. Mr. Sundstrom replied there were two structures with a total of
310 units. One unit is planned primarily for independent living, and
the second independent clubhouse building was intended for use
by the 62 villa units as opposed to the component of the
independent living facility.
49. Commissioner Sharp asked if the clubhouse would have a dining
room. Mr. Sundstrom stated yes.
50. Commissioner Mitchell asked if the condominiums were for
seniors. Mr. Sundstrom replied the whole project was for seniors.
51 . Commissioner Mitchell asked if a senior could move from one area
to another, as their needs dictated. Mr. Sundstrom answered that
was possible. He then went into the physical layout of the site
plan, including street and pedestrian access.
P:\CAROL YNlHPCl 0-18-0 l.wpd
-7-
Historic Preservation Conunission Minutes
October 18, 2001
52. Commissioner Irwin asked if there was going to be any access to
the shopping center. Mr. Sundstrom replied there currently was
none.
53. Commissioner Mitchell stated the archway was a very sensitive
issues to the citizens of La Quinta.
54. Mr. Sundstrom replied it was also a sensitive issue with the
existing property owner. The applicant had discussed the
possibility of saving some of the physical features that are on the
property including the gates and archway. There was a
suggestion of using it in conjunction with a pedestrian pathway,
or cart paths, so it would still meet Fire Department requirements.
55. Commissioner Mitchell asked if the scrollwork and any other
appropriate historic objects could be placed in a central location
to serve as a miniature display of what the Point Happy once was,
and include the Oral History in the same locale.
56. Mr. Sundstrom indicated an area that was a water feature and
suggested it might be possible to place items in that general area.
He also discussed possible areas where these items could be
incorporated into the project. He stated they would use as many
of the different types of architectural features, as well as flora, to
maintain the historic ambiance of the Date Ranch.
57. Commissioner Wright stated the different architectural styles was
why it was so unique.
58. Commissioner Irwin stated another thing that makes this place so
unique is the fact that the people who lived there were so self
sufficient. They did a little of everything. They were finish
carpenters and experimented with different crops. Even the
Clark's themselves were very unique people. Mrs. Clark was so
concerned about the children, who were growing up on that
Ranch, that she sent the girls to high school away from there and
built an air-conditioned house for them to sleep in. She also took
the women to Idyllwild during the summer while the men stayed
to work the Ranch.
59. Mr. Sundstrom acknowledged he had read the history of Point
Happy Ranch.
P:\CAROL YN\HPClO-18-01.wpd
-8-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
60. Commissioner Irwin asked if there might be a place to feature the
original photographic history of the Ranch, so people would be
able to see and understand the history of Point Happy Ranch.
61 . Commissioner Wright commented it could be similar to what was
done at the Tradition with their historical montage and items on
the walls in the Hacienda.
62. Commissioner Irwin stated the difference was that Hacienda del
Gato had been maintained and Point Happy had not.
63. Mr. Sundstrom stated he was not sure how to respond to that
question. He had been working with staff to maintain as much
ambiance in the project as they could.
64. Commissioner Irwin thanked the applicant for his efforts and
reiterated this is a historic site and the Commission is concerned
about not losing the history connected with this site.
65. Chairman Puente asked if there were any plans with more specific
places where the historical features could be placed.
66. Mr. Sundstrom replied they did not have final construction
drawings. He asked if the plans would come back to the Historic
Preservation Commission for approval before the building permits
were issued. He asked if the Commission had any ideas on what
they would like to see, as well as specific locations. He would be
happy to accept them because that was their original intent.
67.. Commissioner Mitchell stated he like the project, but was
concerned about the old Ranch and how things were going to be
incorporated to retain the flavor and integrity of the original Ranch.
68. Mr. Sundstrom replied it was their full intention to build the project
with those parameters in mind. He and his brother had drawn the
landscape plan and written a good portion of the Specific Plan
because they understood the history of this site and wanted to
retain as much of it as possible.
69. Commissioner Mitchell asked if the Commission could see the
Specific Plan.
P:\CAROL YNlHPCIO-18-01.wpd
-9-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
70. Principal Planner Sawa stated a copy of the Specific Plan was
available.
71. Chairman Puente stated the Commission would like to review the
Specific Plan, as well as a list of what items would be included
and where.
72. Mr. Sundstrom then briefly went over some items in the Specific
Plan with the Commissioners.
73. Chairman Puente asked if the Commissioners could each have a
copy of the Specific Plan. Staff would provide copies to the
Commission.
74. Mr. Sundstrom explained they were currently going through the
Site Plan process. They needed to refine the placement of all the
specific features. The buildings are intended to be in the
Castillian-Ranch-style with red tile roofs, slate type features on the
facades with earth tones. This all lends to a character very similar
to what is at Rancho La Ouinta and the original La Ouinta Resort.
75. Commissioner Wright stated he would like to see what was
proposed as to where the walls, gates, and the porticos were
going to be placed as the Commission would like the opportunity
to comment on these plans.
76. Principal Planner Sawa stated a condition could be added stating
prior to issuance of a demolition or grading permit, whichever
comes first, the developer shall met with the Community
Development Department and the Historic Preservation
Commission to determine which existing features of the farm are
to be incorporated into the proposed project.
77. Commissioner Irwin commented on one of the date trees near the
entrance of the property.
78. Mr. Sundstrom replied it was an Indian Red Gum that cannot be
moved. It will die if you move, or trim it. He added most of the
Date Palms were not salvageable, but the taller trees could be
used in conjunction with a building that is relatively tall, which is
what is proposed for this project.
P:\CAROL YNlHPCl O-18-0I.wpd
-10-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
79. Commissioner Wright concurred with his opinion but added it
would be even more important if a photographic record was made
of the property as it '3xists.
80. Mr. Sundstrom stated maintaining the historic integrity of the
property would be a good marketing feature.
81. Commissioner Wright agreed stating the Traditions had found that
to be very true.
82. Commissioner Sharp asked if the applicant proposed a museum on
the site. Mr. Sundstrom stated they envisioned more of an all-
weather outdoor display.
83. Commissioner Irwin suggested the streets or lanes be named after
the people who lived and worked there. She also requested
monitoring be required during trenching.
84. Archaeological Consultant McKenna stated the report requested
monitoring during all earth moving.
85. Commissioner Irwin asked if monitoring was needed during all
earth moving, as this was not normally required.
86. Archaeological Consultant McKenna replied it was necessary for
pre-history.
87. Commissioner Wright asked Commissioner Mitchell what his
thoughts were on the necessity of monitoring during all earth
moving.
88. Commissioner Mitchell replied monitoring was not necessary if the
trenching was comprehensive enough to satisfy everyone in terms
of exploration and subsurface. Otherwise, you would just do the
major grading.
89. Archaeological Consultant McKenna stated that generally the
rough grading, tree removal, and things like that are done initially
to determine if there is any prehistory. The trenching is usually at
the end for finish Vlork where you get a look at the deeper
substrata. If you do not do the rough grade monitoring, you may
lose your pre-history.
P:\CAROL YNlHPCI 0-18-0 l.wpd
-11-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October J 8, 200 J
90. Mr. Sundstrom monitoring is done on a daily basis.
91. Commissioners Wright and Irwin concurred it would be a beautiful
project.
92. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2001-016
recommending approval of Phase I Cultural Resources investigation
of a 43 acre parcel of property, located on the west side of
Washington Street, approximately 300 feet south of Highway
111, subject to the condition as modified:
1. The Oral History Program shall be prepared in cooperation
with the La Guinta Historical Society.
2. Collected materials shall become the property of the City of
La Guinta per the City's Standards of Curation.
3. Prior to issuance of a demolition or grading permit,
whichever comes first, the developer shall meet with the
Community Development Department and the Historic
Preservation Commission to determine which existing
features of the farm are to be incorporated into the
proposed project.
Unanimously approved.
B. Cultural Resources Assessment For Tentative Tract 30331: a request for
approval of the cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract 30331, a
vacant rectangular 4.18 acre parcel located on the north side of Avenue 50,
west of Jefferson Street. Applicants: Santa Properties and Development LLC -
Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (James Brock).
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
2. Commissioner Mitchell concurred with staff's recommendations.
3. Commissioner Wright asked if all the dunes had been tested.
4. Applicant, Nick Santa stated he spent two-and-a-half days on the
backhoe with the Archaeological Consultant. They tested the
P:\CAROL YNlHPCI O-18-01.wpd
-12-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
entire site and although it had been disturbed ten years ago by the
construction of a dwelling lake, nothing was found. Due to the
size of the report it would be given to staff at a later date.
5.
Commissioner Wright
recommendations.
then
concurred
with
staff's
6. Commissioner Irwin stated she had gone out to the site and asked
if the large dune had been tested. Mr. Santa asked if she was
referring to the high point, to which she replied yes. He said that
was dirt from the digging for the lake.
7. Commissioner Irwin stated there was vegetation growing on the
dune and asked if that was all from the lake. Mr. Santa replied it
was.
8. Commissioner Sharp accepted the report as written.
9. Chairman Puente agreed with staff recommendations.
10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Irwin/Wright to adopt Minute Motion 2001-017
recommending approval of the Cultural Resources Assessment for
Tentative Tract 30331, a vacant rectangular 4.18 acre parcel
located on the north side of Avenue 50, west of Jefferson Street.
Unanimously approved.
C. Historical. Archaeological. and Paleontological Resources ReDort: a
request for approval of the Historical, Archaeological, and Paleontological
Resources Report for a 1 5 acre parcel of vacant land located on the north
side of Avenue 58, approximately midway between Jefferson Street and
Madison Street. Applicant: Coachella Valley Engineers (For La Quinta
Construction) - Archaeological and Paleontological Consultant: CRM Tech
(Bruce Love, Principal)
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
2. Commissioner Mitchell stated he thought there should be someone
to monitor the site. They could also identify archaeological
resources, and not just paleontological resources.
P:\CAROL YNlHPClO-18-01.wpd
-13-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
3. Commissioner Wright agreed with staff's recommendation.
4. Commissioner Irwin agreed with Commissioner Mitchell about the
monitoring for both archaeological and paleontological.
5. Commissioner Sharp agreed with the monitoring of both.
6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2001-018,
and Commissioners Wright/Irwin to adopt Minute Motion 2001-
019 recommending approval of the Archaeological and
Paleontological ResoJrces Report for a 1 5 acre parcel of vacant
land located on the north side of Avenue 58, approximately
midway between Jefferson Street and Madison Street with the
following recommendation:
A. Monitoring shall be done for archaeological resources as
well as paleontological resources. All collected
archaeological resources should be delivered to the City of
La Ouinta
Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
A. Commissioner Sharp stated he received a copy of the La Ouinta City
Council/Planning Commission Joint meeting minutes of September 19,
2001. In those minutes, a statement was made by Ben Scoville,
representing the Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, where he asked
that the City of La Ouinta appoint a member of the Torres-Martinez Tribe
to the City's Historic Preservation Commission. Commissioner Sharp
thought that as the Commission dealt with so many areas that touched
on this relationship, it seemed like a very good idea.
B. Commissioner Irwin added she went to a Museum Conference in Palm
Springs last weekend and one of the things that was repeated at all the
sessions was that we are guests in their land and they should not only
be represented, but consulted on regarding projects. She said the
meeting included all the museums from the entire western United States
and Canada.
P:\CAROL YNlHPC10-18-01 .wpd
-14-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 18, 2001
Commissioner Mitchell commented it was a wonderful idea because there
were a lot of things archaeologists could see on the ground, but a Native
American would be knowledgeable about whether the area was sacred
or what it was formerly used for since they have learned about it through
their oral history. It would bring a different dimension, a different quality
to a Commission and it could work very well.
C. Chairman Puente commented that she needed additional training for the
year as she was unable to attend the Barstow Conference. Staff said
they would look into it.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners
Irwin/Sharp to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the
next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on November 15, 2001. This meeting of
the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 4:43 p.m., October 18,
2001. Unanimously approved.
Submitted by:
{Jllltlt-/ If)ll;;fMj
Carolyn Walker
Secretary
P:\CAROL YNlHPCI0-18-01.wpd
-15-