Loading...
2006 03 16 HPC Minutes MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A Regular meeting held at the La Ouinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Ouinta, CA March 16, 2006 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairperson Wilbur at 3:07 p.m. who then led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Mouriquand, Puente, Sharp, and Chairman Wilbur Absent: Commissioner Wright Staff Present: Planning Manager Les Johnson, Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen, and Secretary Carolyn Walker II. PUBLIC COMMENT: III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: Puente and Sharp to Unanimously approved. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners approve the minutes of February 16, 2006. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey Report for Proposed Tentative Tract Map 34495. Applicant: John Hansen (Garland Project) Archaeological Consultant: Larry Pierson, RPA, Brian F. Smith & Associates, George L. Kennedy, Ph.D., Seth Rosenberg, Project Archaeologist Location: Calle Conchita and Madison Street, about 1,000 feet north of Avenue 60. P:\CAROl YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 3-16-06.doc Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2006 1 . Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Wilbur said the report was well done with an adequate amount of resource information and confidential appendix. He expressed concern the history of the Valley wasn't more in depth, but that the overall report was nicely done. 3. Commissioner Sharp said the report went into too much detail making it very difficult to comprehend. He had a question about the reference to a hotel in Palm Springs in the middle of the Appendix. Staff replied it was a citation of the records search. He also had a question about a reference to some exotic pine trees which the staff identified as Tamarisk trees. They were considered exotic because they were non-native. He commented the report was very thorough. 4. Chairman Wilbur had a question about the inclusion of the Spanish Inn. Mr. Seth Rosenberg, Project Archaeologist, replied the reference to the Spanish Inn is from a records search done at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) on reference sites. It doesn't affect the project area. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if it was included in the NAHC search. Mr. Rosenberg replied the EIC sent a packet of information and this was included. 5. Commissioner Mouriquand said the report was good as far as it went. She did not find any discussion about the historic period, no Government Land Office (GLO) search, no reference to the historic structures in the General Plan, or any reference to perusing the draft context statement. She commented the report is incomplete because it did not address the historic period. She used the ARMR checklist and didn't find a research design section. This section should be included in a Phase I report. It does not need to be exhaustive, but should include at least one paragraph of information. She commented the discussion/interpretation at the end, should have been more detailed even though this was a negative survey. She added there were no personnel qualifications included. For those P:\CAROL YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 3-16-06.doc 2 Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2006 reasons, the report was incomplete and needed to be returned to the consultant for completion as well as evidence of archival information, land grants, etc. That information is needed to complete CEQA questions regarding historic resources. The report is lacking and therefore incomplete without the historic resources. 6. Mr. Rosenberg replied they would be happy to add the additional information. He said most of the cities they work with do not require the ARMR Guidelines. He stated they would be happy to adhere to La Quinta's guidelines. Commissioner Mouriquand advised him the City of La Quinta is a Certified Local Government (CLG) and follows the ARMR guidelines. 7. There being no further comments. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mouriquand and Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2006-003 denying acceptance of the Cultural Resources Survey Report as submitted and remanding it back to the consultant to address the Commissioners' concerns. Unanimously approved. B. Paleontological Evaluation Report and Mitigation Plan for a 13.75 Acre Parcel Applicant: John Hansen (Garland Project) Archaeological Consultant: Larry Pierson, RPA, Brian F. Smith & Associates, George L. Kennedy, Ph.D. Location: Calle Conchita and Madison Street, about 1,000 feet north of Avenue 60. 1 . Associate Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Mouriquand said the Commission does not accept letter-format reports. She asked Staff if this submission was pre-approved. Staff replied this was the format presented. Commissioner Mouriquand then asked if a formal records search was performed. Staff replied it was not. Commissioner Mouriquand questioned whether the mitigation measures recommended would still have been appropriate had the consultant done a formal report and conducted a records search. P:\CAROL YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 3~ 16-06.doc 3 Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2006 3. Commissioner Sharp said the project was uncomplicated and the report seemed adequate. 4. Chairman Wilbur stated that if letter statements had not previously been accepted, why would we accept them now. 5. Commissioner Mouriquand said the City has not had a client submit a letter statement and this submission allows the Commission an opportunity to review policy/procedures. 6. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if a previous Paleontological report had been done. Staff said this predated the incorporation of the City of La Quinta. Commissioner Mouriquand suggested acceptance of the letter report with an admonishment not to send another letter report again unless pre-arranged with staff. 7. Commission Sharp said he thought this was a very attractive package and didn't have a problem with accepting it. 8. There being no further comments, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mouriquand and Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2006-004 accepting the Paleontological Evaluation Report and Mitigation Plan as submitted. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: A. California Preservation Conference brochures were distributed. VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Newspaper articles were distributed from Commissioner Wright with comments regarding historic preservation in the Coachella Valley. B. Commissioner Wilbur reminded the Commissioners of the Fred Wolff Bear Creek Channel dedication on Saturday, March 18, 2006 and encouraged attendance. C. Commissioner Mouriquand distributed a flyer on the Dedication of the Ye'we'vichem Park in Coachella, Friday, March 24, 2006 from 3:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m. P:\CAROL YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 3-16-06.doc 4 Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2006 VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Sharp and Mouriquand to adjourn this Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to a Special Meeting to be held on April 27, 2006, This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:39 p,m, Unanimously approved, Submitted by: (tLlIlL/ZC tJdVL- Carolyn '!Yalker Secretary P:\CAROl YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 3-16-06.doc 5