2005 05 19 HPC Minutes
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A Regular meeting held at the La Ouinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Ouinta, CA
May 19, 2005
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by
Chairman Allan Wilbur at 3:05 p.m. He then led the flag salute and asked for the
roll call.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call.
Present: Commissioners Mouriquand, Puente, Sharp, and
Chairman Wilbur
Absent:
Commissioner Wright
Staff Present:
Principal Planner Stan Sawa and Temporary
Secretary Anna Sampson
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: It was moved and seconded by
Commissioner Puente and Commissioner Mouriquand to approve the minutes
of March 17, 2005, April 10, 2005, and April 21, 2005 as submitted.
Unanimously approved.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: None
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Archaeol09ical Testin9 and Evaluation Report - Site CA-RIV-7205/H
(33-12956):
Applicant: RT Hughes, LLC
Archaeological
Consultant: CRM TECH (Michael Hogan, Principal)
Location: Southwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60 .
1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
P:\CAROl YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19.05.doc
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
2. Commissioner Puente asked if the remains had been positively
identified as human. Michael Hogan, Principal of CRM Tech,
replied they had not. They were very small pieces and
consistent with human remains.
3. Commissioner Sharp asked if they were cremated remains. Mr.
Hogan replied they were. Staff asked Mr. Hogan if a positive
determination could be made as to whether they were human
remains or not. Mr. Hogan replied the remains could not be
positively identified. It would just have to be assumed they
were, based on the fact they were burned.
4. Commissioner Sharp said the report stated amethyst glass was
found, but the archaeological catalog referred to it as purple
glass. He asked if these were the same items. Mr. Hogan
replied they were. The names are interchangeable.
5. Commissioner Mouriquand commented the report was well
written.
6. Chairman Wilbur said the report concluded this was not a
historic resource and would only require monitoring during
earth-moving operations. That would be the final mitigation
needed even though there were potential human remains found
on this site. He asked Mr. Hogan if this would be the last time
the Commission would review this project and if further
mitigation would not be needed. Mr. Hogan replied yes, as only
the recommended monitoring would be completed.
7. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if Chairman Wilbur was
concerned that a determination was reached that this was not
classified as a historical resource.
8. Chairman Wilbur replied he was concerned because of the
potential remains. There were a large number of items found in
the testing and evaluation of this site.
9. Commissioner Mouriquand pointed out the number of finds in
the Management Summary which gives recognition for a
cultural resource, even though it doesn't meet the legal criteria
of a historic resource. The human bones are undoubtedly of
great cultural importance and she was happy to see that
reference because it is significant and important and has been
recognized.
P:\CAROl YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19-05.doc
2
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
10. Chairman Wilbur stated one specific item may not meet the
historical criteria, but there may be potential for other finds
during deeper and more extensive excavation. Mr. Hogan
replied that was why they were recommending monitoring.
11. Commissioner Mouriquand added the potential is there for
subsurface finds.
12. Chairman Wilbur asked staff if the monitoring would cover any
contingencies occurring during trenching and excavation. Staff
replied yes.
13. Chairman Wilbur commented it was a good report but was
concerned about the conclusions reached. Mr. Hogan replied a
few pieces of cremated bones are often found. When that
happens, it is better to err on the side of caution and treat them
as human remains. However, that does not provide any
additional scientific knowledge.
14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente and
Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2005-013 accepting the results
of the Archaeological Testing and Evaluation Report - Site CA-
RIV-7205/H, as submitted. Unanimously approved.
B. Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report For the Dunes
Retail Center:
Applicant: Jeff Lowden (The Dunes Business Park, LLC)
Archaeological
Consultant: CRM TECH (Michael Hogan, Principal)
Location: North side of Highway 111, east of Dune Palms Road
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if this was on the Mannino
property. Staff replied it was not; it was east of that parcel.
3. Commissioner Sharp asked about the buildings in the
development to the east of this project. Staff replied the main
buildings were the 99C Only store and Smart and Final. Those
buildings are not part of this development. This property is
P:\CAROl YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19-05.doc
3
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
west of that project. Chairman Wilbur asked if this was to be a
retail center. Staff replied it was.
4. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if Mr. Hogan found any
homesteads on the property. She commented on a Homestead
Map prepared some years back. She thought there might have
been some homesteads in this area. Mr. Hogan said they had
checked and found some 1920's era information.
5. Commissioner Sharp said he was surprised the report did not
include any specific cultural values since the property backs
right up to the evacuation channel.
6. Commissioner Mouriquand commented it would be easy to
check the Government Land Office records on line to see if the
foundation on the property had been a homestead. Mr. Hogan
did not have any further information on whether this was a
homestead.
7. Commissioner Mouriquand commented there was probably no
building permit because it was in the County's jurisdiction and
they didn't start issuing building permits until 1950.
8. Commissioner Puente asked if there was a significant find
during trenching and the archaeologist stopped the project,
would the Commission be contacted.
9. Commissioner Mouriquand answered no. The Commission
reviews the monitoring report after the fact.
10. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente and
Mouriquand to adopt Minute Motion 2005-014 accepting the
Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report for The
Dunes Retail Center as submitted. Unanimously approved.
C. Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report - Tentative Tract
Map 33085:
Applicant: Core Homes, LLC
Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Michael Hogan, Principal)
Location: West side of Madison Street between Avenue 50 and
Avenue 52.
P:ICAROL YNIHist Pres ComlHPC 5.19.05.doc
4
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Chairman Wilbur asked if Mr. Hogan was getting a better
response rate from the local Native Americans. Mr. Hogan
replied he was, even if it was only through form letters.
3. Commissioner Mouriquand said the Morongo Tribe responds by
e-mail. Mr. Hogan agreed. There was a brief discussion
regarding the response of Tribes in the area and the current
status of some of the tribal representatives. Apparently, the
funding for Gary Resvaloso's position had ended and staff
should now contact the Planning Director, Ben Scofield and Joe
Loya, of the Torres Martinez Tribe, with an invitation to attend
the Commission meetings.
4. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente and
Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2005-015 accepting the
Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report for Tentative
Tract Map 33085 as submitted. Unanimously approved.
D. Paleontolo~ical Resources Assessment Report - Tentative Tract Map
33085
Applicant: Core Homes, LLC
Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Michael Hogan, Principal)
Location: West side of Madison Street between Avenue 50 and
Avenue 52.
1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Chairman Wilbur commented on the potential of invertebrate
remains stated in the report.
3. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente and
Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2005-016 accepting the
Paleontological Resources Assessment Report - Tentative Tract
Map 33085 as submitted. Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
P:\CAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19-05.doc
5
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
A, Research Grants:
1. Chairman Wilbur asked staff if they had looked into research
grants and funding for the initiatives that had been previously
discussed by the Commission, Staff replied they had not
actively pursued the information due to understaffing. The
Community Development Department Director is currently
working on adding staff, The Department should be fully
staffed within the next two months and assigned staff should
be able to concentrate more on extra projects.
2. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if the City had a staff member
assigned to writing grants. Staff replied there was someone in
the City Manager's office currently assigned to that.
3. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if that person could do some
preliminary research on what grants are available. Staff replied
they would check into that. Commissioner Mouriquand
suggested they could prepare a list of available grants and staff
could check on them. Staff replied they would check to see if
that was a possibility.
4. Chairman Wilbur added he would be willing to check on the
internet for grant-giving organizations and check to see if the
City qualified,
5. Commissioner Mouriquand suggested staff begin with the SHPO
website, and check under the CLG Annual Grant, The grants,
while not large, can still go as high as $15,000, The grants are
specifically designated for survey work, writing general plan
elements, amending preservation ordinances, and similar
activities. She offered to check the website.
6. Commissioner Mouriquand said the CLG Annual Grant is a
matching grant, The match can be in-kind services utilizing staff
time, City services, etc. It does not have to be a funding
match, She added the Commission could also look at foundation
funding.
7. Chairman Wilbur said he was considering private foundations,
and asked if the City was allowed to accept foundation funding.
P:\CAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19-05.doc
6
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
8. Commissioner Mouriquand said she couldn't remember an
instance where the City had. Staff replied they would have to
look into the matter.
9. Commissioner Mouriquand stated the Commission was a non-
profit entity and should qualify.
10. Chairman Wilbur said he would have to check on the available
grants to see if there were any limitations that would exclude
the City from obtaining funding. Staff replied they would check
on what the City's policy was.
11. Commissioner Mouriquand commented that there are grants
available for as much as $40,000 to $100,000. These types of
grants are perfect for assistance on large projects such as the
City museum. She asked if the City still owned the Museum.
Staff replied, yes, with future plans to expand it.
12. Commissioner Mouriquand suggested the Commission identify
potential projects, and the necessary outlay, and then start
searching for the funding. Staff could begin by looking into the
Fortune 500 foundations, such as Ford, Packard, and Coca
Cola.
13. Chairman Wilbur said there's a book of Foundations, Granting
Institutions, Non-Profits, and Private. He got it when he was
working as a fund raiser. He said there are about half-a-dozen
foundations that pre-qualify their recipients which would be a
good resource to use. He would be willing to check this
resource if someone had a question about a specific website or
foundation.
14. Commissioner Mouriquand added there's a gentleman, named
Mr. Price, who is on contract with the City of Indio to provide
leadership and fund raising services for the Coachella Valley
Historical Museum. He's written some grants, and gotten
funding for their museum facility. Maybe the City could hire him
to advise them where to go to get money, and write the grants
if staff was short-handed. He could also help identify potential
projects. That would be a possible suggestion, but first we
would need to identify some projects, such as any old, historic
buildings belonging to the City that may need to be seismically
retrofitted, or remodeled for adaptive reuse. The City could
then either lease the building to some business entity or turn it
P:\CAROL YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19-05.doc
7
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
into a public building. Staff said they would check on City-
owned properties.
15. Commissioner Mouriquand said display work about the history
of La Quinta could be eligible for funding if it were to be
displayed in a museum.
16. Commissioner Sharp asked about the possibilities available at
Point Happy Estates.
17. Commissioner Mouriquand replied that was privately owned.
She did add there were grants available for technical studies on
historical buildings.
18. Chairman Wilbur gave an example of the Harada house in
Riverside. He explained the condition of the building and the
amount of money it would take to retrofit and repair the
structure.
19. Commissioner Mouriquand explained so many of these
structures are demolished because the cost of saving them is so
exorbitant.
20. Chairman Wilbur said the Commissioners should prepare a list of
projects and sites, and decide which ones are a priority.
21. Commissioner Mouriquand agreed such a list should be
discussed in addition to updating the Preservation Ordinance
and the General Plan Element. She added the Commission
could apply for money to fund an archive room/system when
the City builds the new Museum.
22. Commissioner Sharp commented part of the problem with
funding the Museum was the need for salaried personnel.
23. Commissioner Mouriquand asked the status of the Museum.
Staff replied it is still being considered but didn't know the time
frame. The City was currently working on completing the
Library.
24. Commissioner Mouriquand asked if the City Library had any
interpretive exhibit space. The Commission could apply for a
grant to set up or exhibit in that space. She added libraries are
wonderful places to exhibit things and have archives.
P:\CAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5*lS.05.doc
8
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
25. Commissioner Mouriquand suggested the Commission might
consider hiring a consultant to finish the Historic Context
Statement to assist staff.
26. Commissioner Sharp commented the Historic Context would be
a valuable document to display in several City locations; such as
Old Town, the Library, or SilverRock.
27. Commissioner Mouriquand said the development and publication
of the Historic Context Statement would be helpful, not only as
a public document, but as a planning tool. It could serve as a
historical document that could be sold at City Hall, the Museum,
and the Chamber of Commerce. Proceeds from the sales could
go towards a specific public benefit account, or to make the
document pay for itself.
28. Commissioner Mouriquand replied the Commission could come
up with ideas and work with staff to promote the project. She
added the Commission should start with a project list, such as
the one previously provided by Commissioner Puente.
29. Commissioner Mouriquand suggested the Commission begin
with a manageable project, such as the brochure. The
Commissioners must also be willing to commit more time to
achieve their selected goals.
30. Commissioner Mouriquand asked that this item be included on a
future meeting agenda. Staff agreed to place this item on a
future agenda. Commissioner Mouriquand stated she could
bring brochure examples to the next meeting. The Commission
would need to figure out how to finance the printing costs. She
suggested checking to see if there was a CLG Grant that would
cover these expenses. Staff commented they've seen some
photocopied brochures that gave a very professional impression.
31. Commissioner Sharp agreed today's technology would allow the
Commission to produce a professional-looking, low-cost
brochure.
B. Chairman Wilbur requested an item be added to a future agenda for
Commissioners to discuss the information they received at the Historic
Preservation Conference.
P:\CAROL YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19-05.doc
9
Historic Preservation Commission
May 19, 2005
C. Commissioner Mouriquand had a question, derived from attending the
Conference, about the new L.E.E.D. criteria for public historic
buildings. She asked staff to check on this program. Commissioner
Mouriquand said this was presented at the Preservation meets Green
case study session. Staff agreed to look into the matter.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Sharp and Mouriquand to adjourn this Regular Meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission to the next Regular Meeting to be held on
June 16, 2005. This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was
adjourned at 3:57 p.m. Unanimously approved.
Submitted by:
(i iJ11-fUu Wdhu
Caro;y~ ~alker
Secretary
P:\CAROl YN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 5-19-05.doc
10