1986 11 25 PCA G E N D A
PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QUINTA
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the
La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado,
La Quinta, California
November 25, 1986 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
2. ROLL CALL
3. HEARINGS
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the
Planning Commission on matters relating to City planning and
zoning which are not Public Hearing items.
Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission should use
the form provided. Please complete one form for each item
you intend to address and submit the form to the Planning
Secretary prior to the beginning of the meeting. Your name
will be called at the appropriate time.
When addressing the Planning Commission, please state your
name and address. The proceedings of the Planning Commission
meeting are recorded on tape and comments of each person
shall be limited.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting of
October 28, 1986.
B. Minutes of the adjourned Planning Commission meeting of
November 12, 1986.
6. BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION OF SIGN APPEAL - Appeal of Signage
Conditions for Sign Approval No. 86-038; Applicant,
George Balch - Roger Dunn Golf Shop, 78-267 Highway 111,
La Quinta, CA.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Motion for Adoption.
a
AGENDA - PLANNING COMMISSION
November 25, 1986
7. OTHER
A. Discussion of residential and non-residential uses in
High Density Land Use Designation. (REFER TO MATERIAL
DISTRIBUTED FOR NOVEMBER 12 MEETING.)
B. Identification of subjects/issues the Commission wants
to discuss with the City Council at a formal Council/
Commission retreat sometime in January, 1987.
C. Review of draft "Compact Car Parking Standards".
D. Request for input on policy issue regarding street lights.
8. ADJOURNMENT
- 2 -
-0
0
ITEM NO.
DATE S 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
,-A A
y MOTION BY: BRANDT STEDING MORAN �THORNBURGi
SECOND BY: BRANDT STEDING MORAN WALLING 4HORNBURG-I
DISCUSSION:
ROLL CALL 1—M&:
�CO9!MISSIONERS: AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
BRANDT
STEDING l /
MORAN lam/
WAILING !/
THOIBURGH
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED'. YES NO
ITEM NO
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
0
'
/•
RE: 1.� �d7
MOTION BY: BRANDT STEDING MORAN ViNUING THORNBURGi
SECOND BY: BRANDT STEDING MORAN FTALLING THORNBURG-I
DISCUSSION:
ROLL CALL VOTE:
RCOMMISSIONERS: AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
BRANDT _
STEDING
MORAN —
WALLING
THOMMURGH
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED': YES NO
ITEM NO.
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MOTION BY: BRANDY STEDING S ✓ LLING THOR[SIBURGH
SECOND BY: BRANDY STEDING NDRAN 4�LLING RNBURGH
DISCUSSION:
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO?MSSIONERS:
STEDING
MORAN
MULING
THGENBURGH
AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED': YES NO
MOTION BY: BRANDT
SECOND BY: BRANDT
DISCUSSION
_y1 r
ROLL CALL VOTE:
COPWISSIONERS:
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED'.
0//
ITEM NO. (p .
DATE 1117, (�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AYE NO
YES
ABSTAIN ABSENT
NO
PRESENT
MOTION BY: BRANDT
SECOND BY: BRANDT
DISCUSSION:
ITEM NO. 14
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
019 1
• •
P 1
• V 1. NO
_ 21D 1
• •
P 1
• • i• •ei
ROLL CALL VOTE:
�COP!MISSIONERS: AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
BRANDT —
STEDING —
MORAN —
VPI,.ING —
THOEMURGH —
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED': YES NO
0
ITEM NO.
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
u
RE:
MOTION BY: BRANDT
SECOND BY: BRANDT
DISCUSSION:
ROLL CALL VOTE:
NCO"MISSIONERS: AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
BRANDT -
STEDING -
MORAN -
WALLING -
THOENBURGH -
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED', YES NO
ITEM NO. �•
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
RE:
MOTION BY: BRANDT STEDING MORAN WALLING THORNBURGH
SECOND BY: BRANDT STEDING MORAN WALLING THORNBURGH
DISCUSSION:
ROLL CALL VOTE:
COMMISSIONERS: AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
BRANDT -
STEDING -
MORAN -
WALLING -
THORMBURGH -
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED': YES NO
RE:
MOTION BY: BRANDT
SECOND BY: BRANDT
ITEM NO.
DATE // 2 r✓ 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
211 1
• . `
/•I
1 • 4 N is I 'd!
his IL
vo•,
/' 1 v
sq'il: rei.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
4COMMISSIONERS: AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
BRANDT
STEDING
MORAN
M LLING
THOMMURGH
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: YES NO
m
r1��
O
y
I
R
MEMORANDO
CITY OF LA OUINTA
TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the. Planning
Commission
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: November 24, 1986
SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION ITEM - SPECIFIC PLAN NOS. 85-005A AND
85-005B; CLARIFICATION OF CONDITIONS
Clarification of Condition Nos. 13 and 14 for 52nd Avenue Specific
Plan (SP 85-005A and SP 85-005B) as they relate to Tentative Tract
No. 21880.
JH:dmv
Atch: 1. Letter from J.F. Davidson, Dated 11/19/86
2. Conditions of Approval for SP 85-005A/SP 85-005B
November 19, 1986
Mr. Murrel Crump
Planning Director
City of La Quinta
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, CA 92253
Mr. Crump:
II 'i
RECEIVEL?
NOV 19 1966
OOMMUN TY DEVLEALy_�°•EA
W'MNT usj+7
V nF on
ASSOCIATES
We would, on behalf of our client, request that the following be
considered by staff or the City Council for approval. That
Conditions #13 and 14 of Specific Plan $85-005A and 85-005B be
clarified or modified to meet current conditions on the project.
The condition states 45' approximately, this was based on 60' RW
for Nuestra and 1101 RW for Ave. 52. We have now given 65' on
Nuestra and 120' on Ave. 52.
The section provided meets the requirements of both the noise
study for height and City Engineer for parkway and median width.
This section combines Conditions of Approval (Specific Plan and
Tract 21880), City Engineer concerns and landscape area maximum
slope of 3:1 with sidewalks.
Reducing the median width would make left turn pockets narrow
with small ineffective islands. Pockets of 11 feet are normally
needed as a minimum. Reducing the parkway width would either
result in steep parkway slopes or limit the ability to meander
the sidewalk.
Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Your staff
(especially Gary Price) has been a tremendous help in directing
us with this condition.
Sincerely,
Michael A. Smith
Office Manager
J.F. Davidson Assoc., Inc.
MAS:sb
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING ■ SURVEYING •
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
* TENTH STREET • PO. BOX 493 • RIVE RSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
❑ 11200S. MT. VERNON AVE.. SU I TE 'D' •COLTON, CALI FORMA 92324
❑ P O. BOX 157 • TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92390
❑ 73-OBOEL PASEO, SUITE 103 6 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
(714( 686 0844
(714( 825 1082
(714) 676-5335
(619) 346-5691
1 oru.ai •L (per. VTW, wu
sealignment of Aven 52 a April 16, 1985
MWITIONS or APPROVAL
1. 21he applicant shall cmply with D WAts A, Be C 6 D as contained within
the C=tl dty Developnent Departme:►ts files for Specific plan Nmbers
85-005A and 85-005s, Mich conditions shall take precedence in the event
of any conflict with the provisions of the specific plan.
2. Prior to this specific plan be=cdng effective, the applicant shall
demonstrate compliance with all the provisions and conditions of
approval of both the subject Specific Plans and Street vacation No. 85-007A
and No.65-0078.
3. The applicant shall submit revised engineering street Plans to oznply
with revisions of this approval.
TRAFFIC and CIIORMON
I. Development of Average 52 small be in amplianoe with the City's
roadway standards and the City Dgineers' requi=a=ts.
5. That portion of Average 52 between Celle Fordo and Celle G-Atamala shall
be irq=rwed in acoordanoe with Exhibit E.
6. All additional right of way for public road and utility p rposes shall
be dedicated to the City.
7. Access from Avenida Nuestra to Na&Argton Street shall be restricted.
The applicant small pay all the costs.
8. The applicant shall install traffic control devices as required by the
City engineer.
9. The applicant shall provide traffic chwaw":atien plans for Average 52
between the projects east baadaazy and Avenida Bermudas.
10. The applicant shall redesign the easterly bend of Average 52 to a 20DO foot
radius to allow for traffic safety.
PIM.IC SERVICES and V1' MIES
11. The applicant shall provide for a new fire station in aeeor'danoe with
conditions of approval for Tentative Tract No. 20328 revision ND.l.
12. Eas nen s shall be provided for all public utilities.
NDISE
13. The Applicant shall provide a 45-foot wide parkway (approximately) with
a mMIM= six -fart high berm and six -foal high wall between Avenida Nuestra
and Avenue 52 to mitigate noise impacts. The additional 10 feet shall be
obtained by reducing the median to 12 feet (approK matelY) in width. The
to the south to maximize
wise wall shall be shifted 15'-20' (approximately)
views of the trees and mamtains.
MW3FIC PUNS NOS. 85-005A and 85-005B
April 16, 1995
Page 2.
14. The Applicant shall provide a 35-foot-wide, 6-8-foot-high berm on the south
side of Avenue 52 to mitigate noise inpaction. Any wall on the south side
of Avenue 52 shall be subject to City review aria approval.
15. The Applicant shall sutmit detailed landscaping plans tp the Comity
Development Department for review and approval of all proposed landscaping
within all the right -of -rays of Avenue 52 and Avenida Nuestra (within Tract
20328).
16. The Applicant shall provide a meandering, 6-foot-wide, bicycle path on the
north side of Avenue 52 and a 5-foot-wide, veanderirg, pedestrian path on
the south side of Avenue 52. The bicycle and pedestrian walls may be
shifted to opposite sides of Avenue 52.
17. The Applicant shall assume all costs for the obtaining of land and construction
of inQrove ants for the inplementatim of this approval.
0
M I N U T E S
PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QUINTA
A Regular Meeting Held at the La Quinta
City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta,
California
October 28, 1986 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Vice Chairman John Walling called the Planning Commission
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
A. Vice Chairman Walling requested the roll call.
Present: Commissioners Brandt, Moran, Steding and
Vice Chairman Walling
Absent: Chairman Thomas Thornburgh
Vice Chairman Walling advised that Chairman Thornburgh was
excused from this meeting.
B. Staff Present: Planning Director Murrel Crump, Principal
Planner Jerry Herman, Associate Planner
Gary Price, and Secretary Donna Velotta
3. HEARINGS
None
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
None
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A.
Motion made by Commissioner Brandt, seconded by Commissioner
Moran, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of October 14,
1986, as submitted. Unanimously adopted.
6. BUSINESS
None
7. OTHER
Vice Chairman Walling introduced the first item of discussion as
follows:
0
A. Consideration for changing Planning Commission meeting date
from November 11, 1986, to November 12, 1986, because of a
legal holiday.
1. Vice Chairman Walling made a motion, seconded by
Commissioner Steding, to move the November 11 meeting
to November 12, 1986, because of the legal holiday; an
addition to this motion was to cancel the December 23,
1986, meeting because of the Christmas holiday.
Unanimously adopted.
Vice Chairman Walling introduced the next matter for discussion
as follows:
B. Discussion of the Specific Plan informational requirements.
1. Planning Director Crump explained that the list distributed
to the Commission was for their review and comment.
During a brief discussion period, the Planning Commission
discussed some minor additions they would like added to
the above noted list. No motion was required.
Vice Chairman introduced the next item of discussion as follows:
C. Discussion regarding the sign ordinance; policy direction
needed on general height, size, types, location, how sign
area is calculated.
1. Principal Planner Herman advised the Commission that the
Planning Department is requesting policy direction with
regard to a work program to prepare draft, City-wide,
signing and advertising regulations.
After a brief discussion period, the consensus of the
Planning Commission was to have Staff prepare a draft
Sign Regulation Ordinance for further Planning Commission
review. No motion was required.
Vice Chairman Walling introduced the next item of discussion as
follows:
A. Discussion on compact parking; policy direction needed on the
provisions for compact spaces:
1. Planning Director Crump informed the Commission that
Staff has recently received inquiries regarding the
acceptability of compact parking stalls in commercial
developments. Therefore, Staff has brought this matter
to the Commission for direction.
- 2 -
0
The Planning Commission discussion regarding this matter
resulted in the consensus that compact parking stalls
should be permitted in commercial developments.
Therefore, the Commission directed Staff to prepare an
amendment to the existing ordinance for public hearing.
No motion was required.
Vice Chairman Walling introduced the next matter of discussion as
follows:
E. Discussion of high density land use designation in the General
Plan relating to inclusion of commercial/office use.
Director Crump advised that the Commission had
recently determined that a commercial, retail/residential
mixed -use project was consistent with the intent of the
Village Commercial land use category, but the question
of consistency for mixed use development in the high
density residential category had not been addressed as
yet.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to have
Staff prepare a list of the allowable nonresidential
permitted in the R-3 zone, for evaluation and possible
amendment, with consideration for deleting some use and/
or requiring a Conditional Use Permit for some non-
residential activities. The R-3 zone district is used
to implement the High Density Residential land use
designation. .
Vice Chairman Walling introduced the last item of discussion as
follows:
F. Discussion of expansions and/or additions to existing houses
(structures) in the Special Residential Zone.
Planning Director Crump informed the Commission that the
Planning Department is requesting direction regarding
expansions or additions to existing houses/structures within
the Special Residential Zone.
The consensus of the Planning Commission was that Staff
should prepare an ordinance amendment exempting existing
single family dwellings from certain design standards, for
further review and/or consideration for public hearing. No
motion required.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion made by Commissioner Steding, seconded by Commissioner
Moran, to adjourn to a meeting on November 12, 1986,
at 7:00 p.m., in La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado,
La Quinta, California. This meeting of the La Quinta Planning
Commission was adjourned at 8:30 p.m., October 28, 1986.
- 3 -
PLANNING
M I N U T E S
- CITY OF LA QUINTA
An Adjourned Meeting Held at the La Quinta
City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta,
California
November 12, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER
7:00 p.m.
The Planning Secretary called the Planning Commission meeting to
order at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
A. The Planning Secretary called the roll:
Present: None
Absent: Commissioners Brandt, Moran, Steding, Walling and
Chairman Thornburgh
Staff Present: Planning Secretary Donna M. Velotta
3. HEARINGS
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
6. BUSINESS
7. OTHER
8. ADJOURNMENT
There being no quorum present, the Planning Secretary adjourned
this meeting to the next regular meeting of November 25, 1986,
to be held at 7:00 p.m. in La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle
Estado, La Quinta, California.
The adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
La Quinta, California, was adjourned at 7:05 p.m., November 12,
1986.
MEMORANDA 7.4,
CITY OF LA ®UINTA
TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the.Planning
Commission
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: November 12, 1986
SUBJECT: Non -Residential Uses in the R-2 and R-3 Zoning Districts
At the Commission meeting of October 28, 1986, discussion was held
concerning consistency between the High Density Residential land use
category contained in the recently adopted City of La Quinta General
Plan and the R-3 Zone district used to implement it. The R-3 Zone
had been adopted by reference from the Riverside County Land Use
Ordinance, upon City incorporation. The zone was found to allow a
broad range of non-residential activities not addressed by the
La Quinta General Plan text.
In order to reconcile the City General Plan with implementing zoning,
the Commission requested, for further study, a listing of all
non-residential uses which are presently allowed to occur in the R-3
Zone. The Commission may determine that some or all of these uses
are not consistent with the intent of the City land use category,
and/or conclude that certain uses should only be permitted by means
of a Conditional Use Permit.
The Listing offered in the attachment contains a compilation of all
non-residential uses allowed in the R-3 Zone, which includes those
activities occurring in the R-2 and R-1 Zones.
COMMISSION ACTION
It would be appropriate for the Commission to give further direction
to Staff, if it is determined that amendment of the R-3 Zone is
required. Staff would draft any needed ordinance amendment and
present it for subsequent public hearing.
Again, the Commission has the option to selectively determine which
non-residential uses (if any) it believes to be consistent with the
High Density Residential land use category, and to further restrict
the development of non-residential activities by requiring individual
site evaluation in a Conditional Use Permit application.
PREPARED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Atch: Non -Residential Use Listing
I'
-ATTACHMENT -
NON-RESIDENTIAL USE LISTING: R-3 ZONE
As requested by the Planning Commission, a listing has been prepared
of permitted non-residential uses allowed within the R-3 Zone. It
should be noted that the R-3 Zone also allows all uses permitted in
the R-2 Zone; in turn, the R-2 Zone allows all uses permitted in the
R-1 Zone. The following list is, therefore, all inclusive of
non -dwelling activities which are currently permitted to occur in
these residential zones. (NOTE: This list does not differentiate
between those uses allowed only in the R-3 Zone.)
1) Churches, Educational Institutions, Public Libraries
"d Museums, and Art Galleries not operated for
compensation or profit.
49 2) Nonprofit Clubs and Lodge Halls.
003) Fraternity and Sorority Houses.
0D4) Hotels, Resort Hotels, and Motels.
Ir 5) Nursery Schools for Preschool Day Care.
6) Institutions for the Aged Licensed by the
California State Department of Social Welfare
or the County Department of Public Welfare.
V7) Medical and Dental Offices.
1" 8) Chiropractic Offices.
-09) Law Offices.
yV 10) Architectural, Engineering, and Community Planning
Offices; provided there is no outdoor storage of
materials, equipment, or vehicles, other than
passenger cars.
-ill) Real Estate Offices.
(� 12) Field crops, flower and vegetable gardening, tree
crops, and greenhouses used only for purposes of
propagation and culture, including the sale thereof
from the premises and one (1) unlighted sign that
does not exceed two (2) square feet in size pertaining
to sale of the products.
- 1 -
0
13) The noncommercial keeping of horses on lots not less
than 20,000 square feet in area and 100 feet in width,
provided they are kept not less than 100 feet from any
street and 20 feet from any property line. A maximum
of two (2) horses per 20,000 square feet and, in any
event, not more than four (4) horses on a lot will be
permitted. If a lot is one acre or more in area,
poultry and rabbits may be kept for the use of the
occupants of the premises only. The poultry and
rabbits shall be kept in an enclosed area located not
less than 50 feet from any residence and shall be
maintained on the rear portion of the lot in conjunction
with a residential use. If a lot is two (2) acres or
more in area, two (2) sheep or goats or combination
thereof may be kept in addition thereto, provided they
are kept not less than 100 feet from any street, 20 feet
from any property line and 50 feet from any residence.
014) Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with
standard length fairways and country clubs.
USES ALLOWED BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ONLY
e�15) Parking Areas for Commercial Uses.
1�16) Evening Nursery School, Child Care and Babysitting
"y�(( Facilities, where five (5) or more unrelated children
are kept under supervision by a person licensed by the
State Department of Social Welfare or Riverside County
Department of Public Welfare during any hours between
5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
USES ALLOWED THROUGH PLOT PLAN REVIEW
4 17) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants
where no assistants are employed and the on -site sign
is unlighted and does not exceed two (2) square feet
��pp�� in area.
'Itn) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a
44 subdivision, to be used only for and during the original
sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a p�eer-iod of
two (2) years in any event. v
19) Nurseries, horticultural.
LVUSHIDl
- 2 - 8,,4L �
�,, (,may'- �
® MEMORANDA
�.
CITY OF LA OUINTA
TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members.of the.•Planning
Commission
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: November 25, 1986
SUBJECT: Revision to Parking Standards to Allow for Compact
Vehicle Parking
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of October 28,
1986, discussed compact car parking standards, and the
appropriateness of establishing such standards within the Municipal
Land Use Ordinance, Section 18.12. This discussion was initiated by
the proponents of the Plaza Tampico project, who are requesting that
they be allowed to provide a certain amount of compact car storage
space. Staff contacted several cities in the Coachella Valley; only
Palm Springs has adopted standards for provision of compact parking.
The County of Riverside has also adopted compact car standards since
our adoption of their Municipal Land Use Ordinance.' Both standards
allow a certain percentage of total parking to be compact car
oriented, yet neither standard establishes a threshold for minimum
size of parking lot.
Typically, compact parking standards are based upon a threshold which
establishes the minimum number of spaces to be provided in order to
"qualify" for allowing a percentage of the total number of spaces to
be designed as compact stalls.
The following table is a listing of those agencies contacted and
applicable standards, if any:
% of Total* Minimum Standard Size
Coachella No Standard No Standard
Indian wells "
Rancho Mirage
Indio "
Cathedral City "
Riverside County 20% 8-1/2' x 16'
Palm Springs 25% 8' x 16'
*Specifies maximum allowable percentage
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION
November 25, 2986
Page 2.
STAFF COMMENTS
It would seem appropriate to utilize County standards, so as to
maintain future development consistency. A complete revision of our
parking standards will be done when the entire zoning ordinance is
overhauled.
Attachment #1 is a draft revision of Section 18.12 of the Zoning
Ordinance illustrating the recommended wording of an amendment. The
amendment utilizes standards as provided by the County's ordinance.
Staff recommends that the 8-1/2' x 16' space dimension be utilized,
but provides for discretionary alternative standards to be employed
at the direction of the Commission.
WHN:dmv
Atch: #1, Recommended Amendment
11
C.
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
7
For any parking are which requires (1 ,'20, 25) parking
spaces, up to (15, 20 25)% of the total parking count
may be designed for compact car parking, pursuant to
review and approval under Section 18.30 of this Ordinance.
Typical compact car stall dimension shall be (8,(EEjZD feet
in width and 16' in length for 90-degree angle; 8' in width
and 17' in length for 45-degree angle; and 8' in width and
18' in length for 60-degree angle (SEE ATTACHED
ILLUSTRATION). All other development standards apply. Each
space shall be clearly marked as being restricted to compact
cars only.
40 "
0
0
a
W
MEMORANDA /
CITY OF LA OUINTA
TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the,Planning
Commission
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: November 25, 1986
SUBJECT: Street Lights
BACKGROUND
The Administrative Staff has identified a need to have formal City
policy on street light requirements. Currently, the unwritten policy
is to require developments to install street lights at major
intersections adjacent to their project. The policy questions are:
1) Does the City want to start requiring street lights
along the right-of-way of public and/or private
streets; and/or,
2) Does the City want to start requiring street lights
at major intersections; or,
3) Does the City want street lights at all.
COMMISSION ACTION
It would be appropriate for the Commission to offer their comment on
this subject for purposes of Council input. The matter will,
subsequently, be considered by the City Council for specific policy
direction.
JH:dmv