1985 05 14 PCAGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF IA QUINTA
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta
City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta,
California
May 14, 1985
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
2. ROLL CALL
3. iMARINGS
7:00 p.m.
A. Plot Plan No. 85-143, a request for approval to construct a maintenance
'facility, including a one-story, 7,000-square-f00t golf course maintenance
building, a one-story, 5,380-square-foot homeowners' maintenance building,
and a one-story, 2,220-square-feot superintendent's residence] LW&1ark
Land Capany, Applicant.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Motion for Adoption.
B. Plot Plan No. 85-144, a request for aoprovel to construct a satellite
maintenance facility for "PGA L+Test", including a one-story, 4,500-square-foot
maintenance building and a one-story, 2,200-square-foot superintendent's
residence on 1.2 acres; Landmark Land Company, Applicant.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Motion for Adoption.
fflm• `171 `
A. Minutes of the regular meeting of April 23, 1985.
5. BUSINESS
A. Plot Plan No. 85-146, a request to construct a single-family dwelling on
the east side of Avenida Ramirez, 100' South of Calle Sonora; Michael
Blackwood, Applicant.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Motion for Adoption.
B. Plot Plan No. 85-151, a request to construct a single-family dwelling on
the east side of Avenida Ramirez, 300' South of Calle Colima; Arthur
Anderson, Applicant.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Motion for Adoption.
AGENDA - PIANNING COKUSSICN
May 14, 1985
Page 2.
C. Plot Plan No. 85-152, a request to construct a single-family dwelling on
the east side of Avenida Ramirez, 250' North of Calle Arroba; Arthur
Anderson, Applicant.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Motion for Adoption.
D. Plot Plan No. 85-153, a request to construct a single-family dwelling on
the west side of Avenida Juarez, 130' South of Avenida Mntezimia; Rick
Johnson Construction, Applicant.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Notion for Adoption.
E. Plot Plan No. 85-154, a request to construct a single-family dwelling on
the south side of Avenue 46 (Westward Ho Drive), approximately 450' west
of Roadrunner Irene; Richard Pescador, Applicant.
1. Report from Staff.
2. Notion for Adoption.
E
La Quinta Planning Commission
Attn: Thomas Thornburgh, Chairman
P. O. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA 92253
Subject: PGA WEST
Dear Mr. Thornburgh:
RECEIVED
MAY 131985
COMMUNITY DE ELOPMENT DEPT..
79-700 54th Avenue
Indio, CA 92201
May 8, 1985
The PGA WEST Exhibit "A" plot plan #85-143 shows an area on the south
side of Avenue 54, (the northern perimeter of the PGA WEST project) directly
across from our property at 79-700 Avenue 54, as a "Support and Maintenance
Yard".
On March 13, 1984 we attended the Planning Department Meeting where
Landmark Land Company presented their plans for the PGA WEST development.
During the public comment portion of the meeting we stated our concern
regarding a maintenance yard directly across Avenue 54 from our property.
We feel that with all of the acreage Landmark has within the project area,
that it would not be in the public interest for them to place a maintenance
yard on the perimeter, where it's presence would affect property values
of adjacent properties.
In response to our question the Landmark representative giving the
presentation, together with Mr. Ernie Vossler, stated that the area in
question was designated "Residential" and not planned for a Maintenance
Yard. They also stated that the support and maintenance areas would be
in the interior of the project. This can be verified by the taped record
of the March 13, 1984 Planning Department Meeting.
We strongly urge that the maintenance areas of PGA WEST be placed in
the interior of the project and not on the perimeter, as this would
undoubtedly affect the property values of adjacent property.
We thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
for: Suzanne Kennedy,
Thomas A. Kennedy, and
Marlo L. Kennedy - co -owners
ITEM NO. / /7. o2
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
RE:
q�MOTION
WALT,ING KLIMK BY: GOETCHEUS IEWICZ MORAN THORNBURGH
µ. _
�P. SECOND BY: GOETCHEUS WALLING KLIMKIEWIC MORAN THORNBURGH
T)T SCTTSS TON
ROLL CALL PAW
CO^!MIS S IONERS :
GOETCHEUS
IM]21CIlal=
MORAN
WALLING
THORNBURGH
AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
Vz
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: YES NO
0
ITEM NO.
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
RE:
FS-/,Y-3 -
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
DISCUSSION:
GOETCHEUS
GOETCHEUS
WAIJ ING
WALLING
KLIMKIEWICZ
KLIMKIEWICZ
MORAN
MORAN
THORNBURGH
THORNBURGH
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO*!MISSIONERS:
GOETCHEUS
KLIMKIEWICZ
MORAN
WALLING
THORNBURGH
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED:
AYE
-/
✓
YES
NO ABSTAIN
NO
ABSENT
PRESENT
-
-
-
_
® 0
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA GUINTA
To: Zhe Honorable Chairrmman and Members of the Planning Commmission
From: Community Development Department
Date: May 14, 1985
Subject: PLDT PLAN NO. 85-143
Location: 510' West of Jefferson Street, South Side of Avenue 54.
Applicant: Landmark Land Commpany
Request: Approval to Construct a Maintenance Facility, Including a one -Story,
7,000-Square-Foot Golf Course Maintenance Building, a one -Story,
5,380-Square-Foot Homeowners' Maintenance Building, and a One -Story,
2,220-Square-Foot Superintendent's Residence
1. General Plan
a. Site: Very Low Density Residential (3 or less dwellings/acre).
b. Surrounding Area: Low Density Residential (3-5 dwellings/acre).
2. Zoning
a. Site: A-1-10 (Light Agriculture, 10-Acre Minimum).
b. Surrounding Area: R-2 to south, east and west; A-1 to the north.
3. Erroironmental Assessment: An environmental assessment was prepared by Staff
in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
The impacts identified include:
° Noise resulting from the building use and related activities
near proposed residential uses.
° Land Use - possible land use conflicts between proposed use
and proposed residential uses surrounding the site.
° May decrease attractiveness of adjacent areas for residential
uses.
° May create objectionable odors for proposed surrounding
residential uses.
° May generate substantial additional traffic.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION
May 14, 1985
Page 2.
The project can be determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the
environment provided that appropriate mitigation measures are included as
conditions of approval. A discussion of environmental concerns will be provided
for under "Staff Analysis and Comments".
4. Existing Conditions: The site is currently developed with three (3) metal,
agricultural, accessory buildings and a stucco office building, which are all
being used as part of the "PGA West" construction complex. There is heavy
construction activity and outdoor storage of tractors, fuel tanks and construction
supplies.
The surrounding area is vacant with the exception of the Kennedy property located
directly north of the project. The Kennedy residence is approximately 500 feet
north of Avenue 54.
Proposed lard uses include the surrounding develom ent
residential uses on all boundaries of the project. To
Kennedy property, is the proposed development of Oak T.
that the PGA West, Phase I, is under construction and I
located on the southern boundary of this project. The
shown 150 feet to the east. The site will have access
currently operating well below capacity. Avenue 54 is
of PGA West which designates
the north, surrounding the
ee West. It should be noted
>lanLs stow a golf course
nearest residential unit is
by Avenue 54 which is
designated as a local street.
5. Project Description: The Applicant proposes to construct a maintenance ccmplex on
4.3 acres. The following describes each facility in the complex:
Golf Course Maintenance Building - Has 7,000 square feet and an overall
height of 19 feet (proposed residential units of PGA West have overall
height of 23 feet). Floor plans submitted indicate areas within the
building for storage, a mechanical repair work area, a lunch roan, a
small office and locker and restroan areas. Outside the building are
open storage bins. Exterior elevations submitted indicate the building
will be stuccoed and will have a peaked tile roof. Color board submitted
shows cremTHmlored stucco, brown cement roof tile, accent trim, and
beige, metal garage doors. Four overhead garage doors are shown along
the north building elevation.
Homeowners' Maintenance Building - Has 5,400 square feet and an overall
height of 19 feet. Floor plans submitted are similar to those of golf
course maintenance building. Exterior colors, materials and overall
design are also the same as that proposed for the golf course maintenance
building.
Superintendent's Residence -The building will have 2,200 square feet
and an overall height of 19 feet. The same colors used for the other
two buildings will be implemented. There are three bedroans, each
with a mininum clearing of 10 feet. Two bathroom are proposed along
with an attached double -car garage and there will be a separate pedestrian
exit.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMKESSICN
May 14, 1985
Page 3.
° Existing Facilities - The existing facilities are being used for
construction supplies and offices. Two of the three existing
metal buildings will be removed fran the site. The remaining
metal building and office will be repainted to match those colors
of proposed buildings.
It should be noted that the proposed design of the three buildings will be
consistent in theme and in color with the PGA West residential units proposed
150' east of the project. Both proposals share muted earth tones and desert,
Spanish architecture.
Other design features include:
° Parking - A parking lot consisting of 100 parking spaces is proposed
to ac=mlodate an estimated twenty (20) employees at each maintenance
building. A chainlink fence will separate the parking area from
buildings for security purposes and will be a maximum of six feet in
height.
° � - Landscaping is proposed for the entire perimeter of the
project.
° Parkway and Perimeter Wall - A 20-foot, landscaped parkway is proposed
and will be required to be consistent with the PGA West proposed exterior
treatment. The six-foot, masonry block wall will enclose the entire
project with the exception of access gates.
° Proposed Access,- Entry to the parking and building area is shown in
three places on Avenue 54. Two access points from the facility directly
to the golf course are shown on the south side of the project. An
alternate fire access gate is shown on the east side of the project.
° Proposed Gates - Gates on the northern entry access points will be metal
and painted with muted colors.
° Lighting - Two night security lights are proposed; one is shown as
existing and the other is proposed.
6. Comments fran Public Agencies:
a. Fire Marshal - The Fire Marshal notes as follows:
(1) A fire flaw of 2,250 GPM for a two-hour duration at 20 psi residual
operating pressure must be available before any canbustible material
is placed on the job site. The required fire flow shall be available
fran Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2'h x 2'), located not less than
25 feet or more than 165 feet fran any portion of the building as
measured along approved vehicular travelways.
(2) Gates to facility mist be La Quinta City approved for emergency access.
(3) Occupancy separation may be required for the mechanical work area per
the Uniform Building Code.
b. City Engineer - The Associate Civil Engineer made the following catments:
(1) All parking areas shall be 2'1' AC/4" AB.
0 0
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION
May 14, 1985
Page 4
(2) Avenue 54 shall be improved to 1/2-width ultimate, consistent
with Avenue 54 improvements east of Jefferson Street.
(3) All additional on -site improvements shall be to City of La Quinta
standards.
(4) Site drainage shall be such that no runoff waters enter public
right-of-way.
(5) A minimum of 300 feet between driveways shall be maintained on
Avenue 54.
c. Sheriff's Department - The Sheriff's Department had concerns regarding
the proximity of the parking lot and the maintenance buildings. IITloyees
would be able to steal tools from the buildings and place them in their
vehicles. He also recommended that all dumpsters and grass clipping piles
be located away from the maintenance buildings and parking lots. This
would also reduce the possibility of stolen property being placed in the
dwnpster or grass pile for later pickup.
Outside lighting should be provided around the maintenance building using
either a high-pressure sodium or metal halide light:.
Further comments received from the Sheriff's Department related to alarms,
door materials, types of locks, and identification numbers on equipment.
7. Other Comments: Thomas and Suzanne Kennedy sent a letter opposing the project.
STAFF COMERM AND ANALYSIS
The Community Development Director previously interpreted residential zoning regulations
to allow golf course maintenance buildings as a typical accessory building for golf
course facilities which are permitted in residential and agricultural zones. That
interpretation noted that the golf course maintenance facility shall be contiguous to
the golf course in order to be considered accessory. This project is therefore a
permitted use as the buildings are contiguous to the golf course, even if surrounding
uses are zoned for residential.
land use conflicts between the project and residential uses may occur. It appears,
however, that residential areas will be buffered by distance and adequate screening
(landscaping and proposed 6-foot wall). A golf course is proposed for the south and
Avenue 54 bounds on the north with a 20-foot setback shown on the submitted plans.
The Kennedy residence is approximately 500 feet to the north of the proposed project.
To the east, residential units are shown on the current "PGA West" sunrise Tract as
150 feet away.
While it is unlikely that all noise impacts can be eliminated, conditions limiting
certain types of repair work (including the use of power tools) to inside a closed
building can probably minimize that type of noise to an acceptable level. Traffic
type noise cannot be mitigated. Hours of operation will be from 6:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
and early morning noise created by approval of the project is not typical of residential
areas, although the area is now and will in the future be developed at very low densities.
0
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMUSSION
May 141 1985
Page 5.
There is no mitigation for early morning noise as any other hours of operation would
be counterproductive. C mpared to the current use of the site, it is felt that noise
impacts would be increased, but also mitigated by proposed setbacks and screening.
Concern has been raised in the past pertaining to the setting of precedence for the
perimeter locations of golf course maintenance buildings. It should be noted that in
this case, if Oak Tree West is approved, the buildings will be adjacent to "PGA West"
and Oak Tree West golf course resorts.
An alternative location was studied near the commercial resort core, but further
analysis concluded that this site would create internal traffic hazards, security
problems and aesthetic impacts to the residents of PGA West, who, also being residents
of la Quinta, require planning consideration. Other alternative sites have not been
studied and may be more suitable for the proposed use if the Planning Commission feels
an alternative site would be more appropriate.
Traffic generated by the project will be an increase over current conditions; however,
Avenue 54 is operating well below capacity and although it will continue to be a public
street, has no provisions west of Jefferson Street for regional circulation. The
street ends at the flood control levy. Extension of the road across the levy has been
considered, but any development at the base of the mountain would probably be of low
density due to building constraints.
There are several alternatives to the proposed project, including the following:
1. No action or denial - existing facilities would remain with no
improvements.
2. Approve the project with conditions - existing facilities would be
removed or upgraded, new facilities would be built, including
landscaping and noise mitigation.
3. Consider other more suitable locations.
Staff feels the proposed site is an acceptable location for the proposed use given
the uniqueness of the site and the proposed design of the project. The existing
facilities are being used for similar purposes and there is currently no screening
for visual as well as noise impacts. The proposal includes construction of a six-foot,
masonry wall, landscaping and upgrading of existing facilities. Staff feels the project
might be an overall improvement to the current uses.
Staff can support the location and design of the project with conditions, given the
unique qualities of the site. Those qualities include the existing land use, the
proposed screening and use of land as buffers, and the future development of Oak Tree
West.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The project is consistent with the La Quints General Plan.
2. The project is an allowed use in residential and agricultural zones as an
accessory use for golf course facilities.
3. Although the project may have a significant effect on the enviroment, impacts
can be mitigated to a level of non -significance.
0
STAFF REPORT - PIANNING CCM IISSION
May 14, 1985
Page 6.
4. Land use conflicts have been minimized by the design of the project and proposed
screening.
5. The existing land use creates noise, traffic, and aesthetic impacts.
FINDINGS
1. The project is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan.
2. Construction of the project, in accordance with the conditions of approval, will
not have a detrimental effect on the health and safety of the public.
3. Construction of the project will be compatible with existing area development.
4. The project will not have a significant impact on the environment if adequate
mitigation measures are required as conditions of approval.
• D •. ' 1} II •.
Based upon the above findings, the Omnunity Development Department recamiends
approval of Plot Plan No. 85-143 in accordance with Exhibits A, B1 and Cl, B2 and
C2, B3 and C3, and subject to the attached conditions.
TARID BY: APPROVED BY:
uww 6;( X��
Tamara J. Campbell Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
Assistant Planner Comnnuty Development Director
TJC:dmv
Atchs: 1. Conditions of Approval
2. Exhibits A, Bl and Cl, B2 and
C2, B3 and C3
CCNDrricNS of APPROVAL - PUYr PLAN NO. 85-143
May 141 1985
_m
1. Plot Plan No. 85-143 shall comply with all standards and requirements set forth
in the City of La Quinta Land Use Ordinance.
2. Ibis Plot Plan approval shall expire one year after date of final approval
within which time the construction authorized mist be substantially begin or
the occupancy be in use unless a time extension applied for prior to expiration
date is approved.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated
by this approval, the Applicant shall first obtain permits and/or other clearances
from the following public agencies:
° Riverside County Etnviram ental Health
° City Fire Marshal
° Coachella Valley Water District
° Community Development Department, Planning Section
° Southern California Air Quality Management District
Evidence of said permit or clearance shall be presented to the Building Division
at the time of application for a building permit for the uses contemplated herewith.
Site and Building Design
4. Zhe Applicant shall comply with Exhibits A, B1 and Cl, B2 and C2 and B3 and C3,
as contained within the ConRanity Development Department's file for Plot Plan
No. 85-143 and the following conditions of approval, which conditions shall take
precedence in the event of any conflict with the provisions of the Plot Plan.
5. Colors and materials shall be substantially as submitted and shall be subject
to final approval by the Cmmnity Development Department.
6. Any outside storage, including that which is seasonal, shall be confined to
designated bins and shall cot exceed the height of surrounding enclosures.
7. All mechanical equipment shall be ground -mounted Or screened by the design Of
the roof structure when viewed from adjacent residential properties and public
streets. All mechanical equipment shall be located outside of setback areas.
8. Parking on the site shall be restricted to the designated spaces as shown on
Exhibit "A" and in accordance with City standards. All employees and visitors
to the facility shall park within this improved area.
9. If the demand for parking by employees and visitors should exceed the number of
spaces provided on site, the Applicant shall submit plans to the Comuntity
Development Department for review and approval for the expansion of parking
facilities.
0
CONDITIONS OF APPROdAL - PLOT PLAN NO. 85-143
Streets, Traffic, Grading and Access
10. The following street improvements shall be ompleted prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the approved building:
a. Avenue 54 shall be improved to 1/2-width ultimate, consistent with
General Plan standards and City specifications.
b. The above improvements will necessitate curb, gutter and/or
sidewalk.
11. The access driveways from Avenue 54 shall be constructed with a minimum width
of 24 feet.
12. A maximum of three driveways shall be allowed to Avenue 54. Driveways shall
provide for a minimum spacing of 300 feet between each.
13. The Applicant shall restrict on -street parking as follows, and in accordance
With the Camnuuty Development Department's requirements, by posting the
southerly portion of Avenue 54 as "No Parking".
14. A grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to
the City Engineer for review and approval.
Public Services and Utilities
15. The Applicant shall comply with the following requirements of the City Fire
Marshal to the extent required by the Fire Marshal:
a. Provide for a minimum 2,250 GPM fire flaw from a water system capable
of sustaining such flaw for a two-hour duration at 20 psi residual
pressure. Super type fire hydrants to be located not more than 165'
nor less than 25' from any portion of the building as measured along
approved vehicular travelways.
b. All gates to facility shall be equipped for immediate emergency access
with transmitters of an approved type.
c. The emergency access gate at the end of the residential cul-de-sac,
along the east property, shall be provided generally as shown and in
a manner consistent with any requirements imposed in the adjacent
Tentative Tract Nap.
16. All new utilities serving the facility shall be placed underground on the site.
The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Imperial Irrigation
District.
17. All requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District pertaining to water
and sewer facilities shall be complied with. Tine property shall be annexed
to Improvement District No. 55.
- 2 -
0
CGND1TICNS CF APPROVAL - PIM PLAN NO. 85-143
Walls, Landscaping, Lighting and Signs
18. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a detailed wall plan showing all
perimeter walls, gates and fences shall be submitted for City review and
approval.
a. No barbed wire, razor wire, or similar materials shall be installed
on any required perimeter fence or wall without prior City approval.
b. The perimeter wall along Avenue 54 shall be consistent with the design,
including materials, setbacks and related matter, of the perimeter
Project wall to be approved for the entire PGA West project.
19. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a detailed on -site landscaping plan
shall be submitted for review and approval of the Oamuuiity Development Department.
Said plans shall indicate the location, species, size and spacing of all planting
materials. The landscaping plan shall indicate, but not be limited to the
following:
a. The use of berms, planting materials and other landscaping features
along Avenue 54 in a mariner consistent with other perimeter landscaping.
b. Appropriate trees or similar materials along the side and rear property
lines to screen buildings and parking areas from adjacent residential
uses.
c. Provision for planting within parking areas to provide some shading
therein.
20. The Applicant shall provide a minimum 20-footr landscaped parkway on the
south side of Avenue 54 which shall be consistent with plans approved for the
"PGA West" Specific Plan, which shall include any berms, landscaping and wall
treatment.
21. The Applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan showing the location, design,
type (including manufacturer) and intensity of all proposed exterior lighting.
All lighting shall be screened so as not to shine directly on properties outside
the project's perimeter walls nor to create substantial light wash, which may be
a nuisance to surrounding residents.
22. The location and design of all signing shall be subject to the review and approval
of the OmTmn-ity Development Department.
Miscellaneous
23. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of infrastructure fees, either
interim or permanent, based upon City policy.
24. All repair work and repair -related activities (including the sharpening of tools
and/or blades), and the use of power tools shall be confined to the closed
maintenance buildings.
- 3 -
79-700 Avenue 54
Indio, CA 92201
April 30, 1985
Mr. Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
Community Development Director
City of La Quinta
P. 0. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA 92253
Subject: PGA WEST
Dear Mr. Stevens:
RLCEIVED
MAY 2 1985
CDMMUNR DEVELdUINTA
PMENT DEPT
The PGA WEST Exhibit "A" plot plan #85-143 shows an area on the
south side of Avenue 54, (the northern perimeter of the PGA WEST project)
directly across from our property at 79-700 Avenue 54, as a "Support and
Maintenance Yard".
On March 13, 1984, we attended the Planning Department Meeting
where Landmark Land Company presented their plans for the PGA WEST
development. During the public comment portion of the meeting, we stated
our concern regarding a maintenance yard directly across Avenue 54 from
our property. We feel that with all of the acreage Landmark has within
the project area, that it would not be in the public interest for them
to place a maintenance yard on the perimeter, where it's presence would
affect property values of adjacent properties.
In response to our question the Landmark representative giving the
presentation, together with Mr. Ernie Vossler, stated that the area in
question was designated "Residential" and not planned for a Maintenance
Yard. They also stated that the support and maintenance areas would be
in the interior of the project. This can be verified by the taped record
of the March 13, 1984 Planning Department Meeting.
We strongly urge that the maintenance areas of PGA WEST be placed
in the interior of the project and not on the perimeter, as this would
undoubtedly affect the property values of adjacent property.
We thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
omas A. Kenne y zanne Kennedy
ITEM NO.
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MOTION BY: GOETCHEUS WAIffIW;
SECOND BY: GOETCHEUS VPLLING
DISCUSSION
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO*1MISSIONERS:
GOETCHEUS
KLII KI31ICZ
MORAN
VZALLING
THORNBURGH
KLIMKIEWICZ MORAN THORNBURGH
KLIMKIEWICZ MORAN THORNBURGH
AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: YES NO
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA OUINTA
To: 7ne Honorable Chai„ an and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Co wzdty Development Department
Date: May 14, 1985
Subject: PLOT PLAN NO. 85-144
Location: Approximately 660' South of Avenue 54 on the West Side of Madison Street
Applicant: Landmark Iand Ccapany
Request: Approval to Construct a Satellite Maintenance Facility for "PGA West".
Proposal Includes a One -Story, 4,500-Square-Foot Maintenance Building
and a ane-Story, 2,200-Square-Foot Superintendent's Residence on 1.2
Acres.
1. General Plan
a. Site: Low Density Residential (3-5 dwellings/acre).
b. Surrounding Area: Low Density Residential (3-5 dwellings/acre).
2. Zoning
a. Site: R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings).
b. Surrounding Area: R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings).
3. Environmental Assessment: An environmental assessment was prepared by Staff in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Ire impacts identified include:
" Noise resulting from the building use and related activities
near proposed residential uses.
° Land Use - possible land use conflicts between proposed use
and proposed surrounding uses may occur.
° May decrease attractiveness of adjacent area for residential
uses.
° May create objectionable odors for proposed surrounding
residential uses.
The project can be determined to have a non -significant effect on the environment
if adequate mitigation measures are incorporated as conditions of approval. A
discussion of environmental concerns will be provided for under "Staff Analysis
and Comments".
SMFF REPORT - PIANMG C OHKESSICN
May 14, 1985
Page 2.
4. Existing Conditions: The site has been previously graded and is currently vacant.
The surrounding area has also been previously graded and is in a disturbed state
With the exception of the fallow field to the east side of Madison Street, which
is under Riverside County jurisdiction.
Proposed land uses include the surxormiding development of "PGA West" which has
designated the area for residential uses. The submitted plot plans for this
application show residential units and planned streets; however, no plans have
been submitted for specific development in the surrounding area. plans have been
submitted for the new fire station which is proposed for the property adjacent to
this project on the north.
The site will have access by Madison Street which is currently operating well
below capacity. With the buildout of "PGA West", traffic is likely to increase
substantially. Madison Street is designated as a 100-foot, major street and has
been improved to 3/4-width with a center median, resurfacing and curb and gutters.
5. Project Description: The Applicant proposes to construct a "satellite" golf course
maintenance codex on 1.2 acres. The following describes each facility in the
complex:
Golf Course Maintenance Building - Has 4,500 square feet and an overall
height of 16 feet. Floor plans submitted indicate areas within the
building for storage, mechanical repair work, a lunch roan, a small
office, three supply roans and lockers and restroom areas. Outside the
building are storage bins for supplies and an area for two, 500-gallon
subsurface fuel storage tanks and pumps. Exterior elevations submitted
indicate the building g will be stuccoed and have a peaked, tile roof with
rafter tails. Color board submitted shows a cream -,colored stucco, brown
count roof tile, accent trim and metal garage doors. Fair overhead
garage doors are shown along the west building elevation.
superintendent's Residence - The building will have 2,200 square feet
and an overall height of 19 feet. The same colors used for the mainte-
nance building will also be used for the superintendent's residence.
There are three bedrooms, each with a minimum clearing of ten feet.
Two bathrooms are proposed. The building will have an attached two -car
garage with a separate pedestrian exit.
It should be noted that the proposed design of both the buildings will be
consistent in theme and in color with each other. Both buildings have muted
earth tones and peaked file roofs.
Other design features include:
° Parking - A parking area consisting of 23 parking spaces is proposed
to aocamndate maintenance facility employees. A chainlink fence will
separate parking area fun building g area.
° Iarndscaping - landscaping is p for the entire perimeter of the
project. A detailed landscape plan will be submitted.
SnUT REPORT - PIAMING COMMISSION
May 14, 1985
Page 3.
Parkway and Perimeter Wall - A 22-foot, landscaped parkway is proposed
on the west side of Madison Street. Also shown on the plot plan is a
five-foot, meandering sidewalk and a six-foot perimeter wall. All
landscaping, walls, parkways and sidewalks will be consistent with
"PGA West" and Fire Station frontage. The six-foot, masonry block wall
will enclose the entire project with the exception of access gates.
° Proposed Access - Entry to the parking area and building is shown on
Madison Street. A median cut is also proposed for that entry. Access
to the golf course is proposed on the east side of the project. A
20-foot easement is shown for this access.
° Proposed Gates - Main entry gates will be metal and painted.
° Lighting - One night security light is proposed.
6. Comments from Public Agencies
a. Fire Marshal - The Fire Marshal notes as follows:
(1) A fire flaw of 1750 GPM for a two-hour duration at 20 psi residual
operating pressure must be available before any combustible material
is placed on the job site. The required fire flow shall be available
from Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2; x 2'), located not less than
25' or more than 165' from any portion of the building as measured
along approved vehicular travelways.
(2) Gates to facility must be La Quinta City approved for emergency access.
(3) pocupancy separation may be required for the mechanical work area per
Uniform Building Code.
b. City Engineer - The Associate City Civil Engineer made the following comments:
(1) All parking areas shall be 2V AC/4" AB.
(2) All on -site improvements shall be to City of La Quints standards.
(3) Median island break shall not be permitted.
(4) Site drainage shall be such that no runoff waters enter public streets.
c. Sheriff's Department - The Sheriff's Department had concerns regarding the
proximity of the parking lot and the maintenance buildings. Employees would
be able to steal tools from the buildings and place then in their vehicles.
He also recommended that all dumpsters and grass clipping piles be located
away from the maintenance buildings and parking lots. This would also reduce
the possibility of stolen property being placed in the dumPster or grass pile
for later pickup.
outside lighting should be provided around the maintenance building using
either a high-pressure sodium or metal halide lights.
Further comments received from the Sheriff's Department related to alarms,
door materials, types of locks and identification numbers on equigrent.
STAFF MU.ORT :M1.1 IAe VChLT J
Page 4.
Kr.*Z i� 0,kN&wIzIsw"r:\$Y=C
The Camamity Development Director previously interpreted residential zoning regulations
to allow golf course maintenance buildings as a typical accessory building for golf
course facilities which are permitted in residential zones. That interpretation noted
that the golf course maintenance facility shall be contiguous to the golf course in
order to be considered accessory. Although the project is not surrounded or bounded
by golf course facilities, it is felt that direct access, provided by a 20-foot wide
easement, located adjacent to the project, provides accessory linkage within an
appropriate amount of distance.
%iile lam use conflicts may occur between the proposed use and residential areas, it
should be noted that residential areas will be buffered from the use by streets, setbacks,
walls and landscaping. The Fire Station location directly north of the project provides
a unique situation for the siting of the proposed use. Iand use conflicts would be more
significant if residential areas were directly contiguous to the project.
It is unlikely that all noise impacts can be elim;nated; however, conditions limiting
certain types of repair work (including the use of power tools) to inside a closed
building can minimize noise impacts to an acceptable level. Noise from traffic would
be incremental due to the low degree of activity on the site. Hours of operation will
be from 6:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. and early morning noise created by approval of the
project is not typical of residential areas. This early morning noise cannot be miti-
gated as any other hours of operation would be counterproductive. It is unlikely that
noise impacts would be significant.
^Traffic generated by the project will be an incremental increase over current activities.
�It is unlikely that the amount of traffic generated would interfere with future vehicular
moveresnt. The re Vest far a median opening should not be approved. In general, excessive
)median openings should be discouraged and limited to major traffic -generating facilities.
Clearly, the proposed use does rot fall within that category. If the lack of a median
adversely affects access for some types of vehicles, either their travel routes to the
,site or the on -site design should be modified.
In conclusion, Staff feels the proposed site is an acceptable location for the proposed
use given the location of the Fire Station and the proposed design of the project.
other alternative sites have not been studied and may be more suitable for the proposed
use if the Planning Ccniissicn feels an alternative site would be more appropriate.
CONCWSICNS
1. one project is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan.
2. The project is an allowed use in a residential zone as an accessory use for golf
course facilities.
3. Although the project may have a significant effect on the environment, impacts
can be mitigated to a level of non -significance.
4. Iand use conflicts have been minimized by the design of the project and proposed
screening.
5. The Fire Station location provides a unique opportunity for the siting of the
location.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CCwnssION
May 141 1985
Page 5.
FINDINGS
1. The project is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan.
2. Construction of the project, in accordance with the conditions of approval, will
not have a detrimental effect on the health and safety of the public.
3. Construction of the project will be compatible with existing area development.
4. The project will not have a significant impact on the envircrTmt if adequate
mitigation measures are required as conditions of approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above findings, the Cmmnuty Development Department recoimieais
approval of Plot Plan No. 85-144, in accordance with ad ibits Al, A2, B and C,
and B3 and C3, and subject to the attached coalitions.
P4ARID BY: APPROVED BY:
�.(6 -.1- a,
Tamara J. Campbell
Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP S�-
Assistant Planner Camunity Development Director
TJC:dmv
Atchs: 1. Coalitions of Approval
2. Exhibits Al, A21 B and C,
and B3 and C3
CONDITIONS CF APPROVAL - PLOr PLAN NO. 85-144
May 14, 1985
General
1. Plot Plan No. 84-144 shall comply with all standards and requirements set forth
in the City of La Quinta land Use Ordinance.
2. This Plot Plan approval shall expire one year after the date of final approval
within which time the construction authorized mist be substantially begun or the
occupancy be in use unless a time extension applied for prior to expiration date
is approved.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated
by this approval, the Applicant shall first obtain permits and/or other clearances
from the following public agencies:
° Riverside County Environmental Health
° City Fire Marshal
° Coachella Valley Water District
° Community Development Department, Planning Division
° Southern California Air Quality Maintenance District
Evidence of said permit or clearance shall be presented to the Building Division
at the time of application for a building permit for the uses contemplated herewith.
Site and Building Design
4. The Applicant shall amply with Exhibits Al, A2, B and C, B3 and C3, as contained
within the Oommuuity Development's file for Plot Plan No. 85-144, and these
conditions, which conditions shall take precedence in the event of any conflict
with the provisions of the Plot Plan.
5. Colors and materials shall be substantially as submitted and shall be subject to
final approval by the C==ity Development Department.
6. Any outside storage, including that which is seasonal, shall be in designated
areas and shall not exceed the height of surrounding enclosures.
7. All mechanical equipment shall be ground -mounted or screened by the design of the
roof structure when viewed from adjacent residential properties and public streets.
All mechanical equipment shall be located outside of setback areas.
8. Parking on the site shall be restricted to the designated spaces as shown on
Exhibit "A2" and in acoordance with City standards. All employees and visitors
to the facility shall park within this improved area.
9. If the demand for parking by employees and visitors should exceed the number of
spaces provided on site, the Applicant shall submit plans to the Community
Development Department for review and approval for the expansion of parking
facilities.
C(NDITIONS OF APPRWAL - PLOT PLAN NO. 85-144
Streets, Traffic, Grading and Access
o. The median opening proposed near the south end of the project on Madison Street
LL shall be deleted.
11. All access driveways to Madison Street shall be constructed with a minimum
width of 24 feet.
12. A grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to
the City Engineer for review and approval.
Public Services and Utilities
13. The Applicant shall comely with the following requirements of the City Fire
Marshal, to the extent required by the Fire Marshal:
a. Provide for a minkmzn 1,750 GPM fire flow from a water system capable of
sustaining such flaw for a two-hour duration at 20 psi residual pressure.
"Super" type fire hydrants to be located not more than 165' nor less than
25' from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular
travelways.
b. All gates to facility shall be equipped for immediate emergency access
with transmitters of an approved type.
14. Requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District relating to water and
sewer facilities shall be complied with.
15. All new utilities serving the facility shall be placed underground on the site.
The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Imperial Irrigation
District.
Walls. Landscaninq. Lighting and Si
16. Prior to issuance of building permits, a detailed wall plan showing all perimeter
walls, gates and fences shall be submitted for City review and approval.
a. No barbed wire, razor wire or similar materials shall be installed on
any fence or wall without prior City approval.
b. The perimeter wall along Madison Street shall be consistent with the design
including materials, setbacks and related matter, of the perimeter
project wall to be approved for the entire PGA West project.
17. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a detailed on -site landscaping plan
shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Community Development
Department. Said plan shall indicate the location, species, size and spacing
of all planting materials. The landscaping plan shall indicate, but not be
limited to, the following:
a. The use of berms, planting materials and other landscaping features
along Madison Street in a manner consistent with other perimeter landscaP'ng-
b. Appropriate trees or similar materials along the side and rear property
lines to screen buildings and parking areas from adjacent residential
uses.
c. Provision for planting within parking areas to provide some shading therein.
- 2 -
COMMONS OF APPROVAL - PLOT PLAN NO. 85-144
18. Applicant shall provide a mininann 22-foot wide, landscaped parkway along the
east property line which shall be consistent with plans approved for "PGA West"
which shall include any berm, landscaping and walls.
19. The Applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan showing the location, design,
type (including manufacturer) and intensity of all proposed exterior lighting.
All lighting shall be screened so as not to shine directly of properties outside
the project's perimeter walls nor to create substantial light wash which may be
a nuisance to surrounding residents.
20. 'Ihe location and design of all signage shall be subject to the review and approval
of the Cmuunity Development Department.
Miscellaneous
21. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of infrastructure fees, either interim
or permanent, based upon City policy.
22. All repair work and repair -related activities (including the sharpening of tools
and/or blades), and the use of power tools shall be confined to closed buildings.
a - a e.�
23. Applicant shall provide a10 Q £ for golf course access on the east
side of the property.
- 3 -
ITEM NO. f7.
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
RE:
MOTION BY: GOETCHEUS VALT,D KLIMKIEWICZMORAN THORNBURGH
SECOND BY: GOETCHEU �V� 3NG//KLIMKIEWICZ MORAN THORNBURGH
DISCUSSION: 7(-
ROLL CALL VOTE:
COMMISSIONERS: AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
GOETCHEUS -
hLDTlIYS9ICZ -
MORAN -
VlALLING -
THORNBURGH -
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: YES NO
III I
MINUTES
PLAtUING CaVISSION - CITY OF LA =NTA
A Regular Meeting Held at the La Quinta
City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quintal
California
April 23, 1985 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Chairman Thornburgh called the Planning Commission meeting to order at
7:00 p.m. He called upon Commissioner Moran to lead the flag salute.
2. ROLL CALL
A. Chairman Thornburgh requested the roll call. The Secretary called the roll:
Present: Camdssioners Goetcheus, Klimkiewicz, Moran, Walling and Chairman
Thornburgh
Absent: None
Also present were Ca munity Development Director Lawrence L. Stevens,
Associate Planner Gary W. Price and Secretary Donna M. Velotta.
Chainnann Thornburgh identified the public hearing as Tentative Tract Map No. 20717,
a proposal to divide 132+ acres into 109 lots with 23 single-family dwellings on
individual lots and 488 condominium units on the remaining lots on the south side
of Avenue 54, along the proposed alignment of PGA Boulevard; Sunrise Company,
Applicant. He called for the staff report.
1. Lawrence L. Stevens, Community Development Director, advised that this project
is the first phase of the implementation of the PGA West Specific Plan, which
is a 5,000-unit project with a resort core, commercial and four major golf
courses. At present construction has already begun on the Pete Dye stadium
golf course, Avenue 54 and Madison Street have been improved and accepted by
the City. Plans for PGA Boulevard have been approved and the work will begin
on that shortly. The community Development Department has other plans in
process for other components of the project, which the Commission will be seeing
shortly. This is the first residential conronent and consists of 511 units
around the stadium course and around part of the Arnold Palmer course, for which
a grading permit has been issued. The units are mixed and include 488 condominiums
which are broken into duplex, triplex and fourplex units. The overall development
plan is consistent with the PGA West Specific Plan. The number of recreation
facilities is in excess of our mind'= standards. The units are of fairly good
size and are tentatively priced from $120,000 to $650,000 depexding upon the group
of units. In general, we have very little problem with the proposal. A number
of concerns which were discussed at the Study Session included, the current con-
flict regarding school district boundary lines, circulation - principally as it
was necessary for emergency vehicle access and interior access wish regard to
how off-street parking would be worked into the narrow street system. However,
for the most part, the conditions of approval resolved the majority of these
concerns. Therefore, Staff recommends that Tentative Tract Map No. 20717 be
approved based upon the findings in the Staff Report and subject to the conditions
of approval, as amended. Director Stevens related the four minor changes in the
conditions of approval to be as follows:
"L; algnat at Jefferson, PGA norLevara ann avenue 54 - Tile
consensus at the Study Session was that the timing of the
installation of this signal should be related to the City
traffic monitoring program which we will be starting in the
next fiscal year, but at minimum we will review the traffic
here at the time building permit No. 250 of the 511 units
is issued, using that as a control point. The language in
Condition No. 14 will be modified to accomplish this.
° In Condition No. 15.c., Staff has deleted the reference to
Lot 30 because we were able to provide a temporary, continuous
loop at that point.
MINUM - PINT ING CO USSI(N
April 23, 1985
Page 2.
° In Condition No. 19, Staff added an additional comment that would
allow the Fire Marshal to approve alternate means of compliance
with his requirements haw he deans it appropriate and determines
them to be equivalent to the detailed standards listed.
• In Condition No. 31, Staff added an additional comment noting
that a change in the total number of units would not exceed 10% of
the approved total of 511, shall be deemed compatible with approved
unit designs, and shall be consistent with the overall character of
the project. In addition to this, Director Stevens requested that
the Commmission give him authority to approve changes in unit mix
rather than having to care back to them. The purpose of this is to
allow the Applicant flexibility to adjust to the market, both up and
down, without having to go through the formal review process.
This concluded the Staff Report.
Chairman Thornburgh opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m.
Jim Resney, Vice President, Sunrise Company - Ap licant, 75-005 Country Club
Drive, Palm Desert, stated to the commission tha his company is very excited
about starting their first project in our City. He noted that in working so
closely with Staff, most of the concerns they had with the City's conditions
have been worked out to everyone's satisfaction.
Robert Altevers, Architect for the project, 2915 Redhill Avenue, Costa Mesa,
gave a descriptive presentation of the design of the project.
There was a brief discussion period.
Kevin Manning, Landmark Land Company, P. O. Box 1578, La Quinta, spoke in
favor of the project.
Charles Schultz, Attorney, 3800 Orange Street, Riverside, spoke for his client
(Mr. Giannini), a property owner in the area of the project, who was concerned
with access to their property. These concerns were satisfactorily solved.
Chairman Thornburgh closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m.
There was a discussion among the Commissioners. All were in favor of the
project with the exception of Commissioner Goetcheus, who was concerned with
the zero lot lines.
Conditions of approval that were amended or added were Nos. 14, 15, 19, 19.a.,
31 and 31.b.
Chairman Thornburgh called for a motion.
Commissioner walling made a motion based on the findings in the Staff Report
to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 20717, subject to attached conditions, as
amended. Commissioner Moran seconded the motion. Chairman Thornburgh called
for a Roll Call. The Secretary called the roll as follows:
Commissioner Goetcheus - Nay
Commissioner Klimkiewicz - Aye
Commissioner Moran - Aye
wii.u�alln leY Walling - Aye
Chairman Thornburgh - Aye
Unanimously adopted with one objection.
• tia nn••
A. & B. Commissioner Klimkiewicz made a motion which was seconded by Camiissicner
Walling to approve the minutes of the regular meetings of March 26, 1985,
and April 9, 1985.
1. The minutes of the regular meetings of March 26, 1985, and April 9,
1985, were approved as submitted. Unanimously adopted.
MINUTES - PLANNING COM IISSICN
April 23, 1985
Page 3.
5. BUSINESS
There being no further items of agenda to come before the Omission, Chain
Thornburgh called for a motion to adjourn.
Chairman Thornburgh made a motion to adjourn to the adjourned meeting of April 30,
1985, at 7:00 p.m., in La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, la Quintal CA.
Courdssioner Walling seconded the motion. Unanimously adopted.
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California,
was adjourned at 8:00 p.m., April 23, 1985, in the La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle
Estado, La Quinta, California.
RECEIVED
MAY 13TOF LA p1985
COMMUTA
NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
79-700 54th Avenue
Indio, CA 92201
May 8, 1985
La Quinta Planning Commission
Attn: Thomas Thornburgh, Chairman
P. O. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA 92253
Subject: PGA WEST
Dear Mr. Thornburgh:
The PGA WEST Exhibit "A" plot plan #85-143 shows an area on the south
side of Avenue 54, (the northern perimeter of the PGA WEST project) directly
across from our property at 79-700 Avenue 54, as a "Support and Maintenance
Yard".
On March 13, 1984 we attended the Planning Department Meeting where
Landmark Land Company presented their plans for the PGA WEST development.
During the public comment portion of the meeting we stated our concern
regarding a maintenance yard directly across Avenue 54 from our property.
We feel that with all of the acreage Landmark has within the project area,
that it would not be in the public interest for them to place a maintenance
yard on the perimeter, where it's presence would affect property values
of adjacent properties.
In response to our question the Landmark representative giving the
presentation, together with Mr. Ernie Vossler, stated that the area in
question was designated "Residential" and not planned for a Maintenance
Yard. They also stated that the support and maintenance areas would be
in the interior of the project. This can be verified by the taped record
of the March 13, 1984 Planning Department Meeting.
We strongly urge that the maintenance areas of PGA WEST be placed in
the interior of the project and not on the perimeter, as this would
undoubtedly affect the property values of adjacent property.
We thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
for: Suzanne Kennedy,
Thomas A. Kennedy, and
Marlo L. Kennedy - co -owners
ITEM NO. S, /7, t u ✓� E,
DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING �q
MOTION
BY:
GOETCHEUS
WALT.ING
KLIMKIEWICZ
MORAN
THORNBURGH
SECOND
BY:
GOETCHEUS
WALLING
KLIMKIEWICZ
THORNBURGH
DISCUSSION:
ROLL CALL VOTE:
COMMISSIONERS:
GOETCHEUS
KLDlKMlICZ
MORAN
WALLING
THORNBURGH
AYE NO ABSTAIN ABSENT PRESENT
UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: YES NO
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable Chairman and Maarbers of the Planning Camiission
From: Camnmity Developnent Department
Date: May 14, 1985
Subject: PLOT PLAN NO. 85-146
Location: Fast Side of Avenida Ramirez, 100' South of Calle Sonora
Applicant: Michael Blackwood
Request: Approval to Construct a Single -Family House for Residence
1. General Plan: Loa Density Residential (3-5 dwellings/acre).
2. Zoning: R-l* (One Family Dwellings, 17' Height Limit, 1200 Square Foot Minimwn
Dwelling Size).
3. Foisting Conditions: The 50' x 100' interior lot is located within the subdivided
Cove on the east side of Avenida Ramirez, south of Calle Sonora. The neighborhood
is typical of Cove development with primarily vacant lots and scattered housing.
Of the 22 lots within the block, there are only four houses. Existing development
in the neighborhood consists of a variety of architectural styles varying from
California Ranch design to Spanish, all having sloping roofs.
4. Envirameental Considerations: The project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15303 of the CEQA guidelines. A Notice of Exenption will be filed with
the County Recorder contingent upon approval of the project.
5. Description of the Request: The Applicant is intending to construct the proposed
single-family house for his personal residence. The design of the proposed house
is conventional, typical for the La Quinta Cove area, with a California Ranch
architectural flavor. The house is to have a light brown (Navajo Brown) stucco
exterior with dark "Old English" brown wood trim. The roof design has a standard
sloping 4 and 12 pitch canposed of combination brown and tan asphalt shingles.
The floor plan is very functional with the dining and living roans surrounding
the kitchen to the west side and the 1-3/4 bathroom and three bedroom are located
to the east side of the house. The gross floor area is 1510 square feet (1320 net
usable floor area). An attached two -car garage is provided with a connecting
pedestrian door into the hone.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CCWUSSION
May 14, 1985
Page 2.
Maxim= building height is 16 feet. The setbacks are as follows:
* Front Yard - 20 feet from Avenida Ramirez
° Side Yards - 5 feet
° Rear Yang - 17.5 feet
STAFF CCMMENPS AND ANALYSIS
The floor plan, exterior design, and setbacks amply with the City's adopted standards
for single-family houses and the requirenents of the R-1*++ Zone. The proposed house
is generally cotpatible with the surrounding development. The proposed house is
appropriately sited in an east -west orientation on the single lot as are many of the
neighboring houses. The overall design, roof style, mass, bulk, and height of the
proposed house is ccapatible with existing development.
1. The project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
2. The request is consistent with the requirenents of the R-1*++ Zone and the
goals and objectives of the La Quinta General Plan.
3. The building design is canpatible with the area development contingent upon
the conditions of approval.
STAFF RECTICN
Based upon the above findings, the Canmmity Development Department recommends
approval of Plot Plan No. 85-146 in accordance with Exhibits A, B and C and subject
to the attached conditions.
Ge, W.
Gary W. Price
Associate Planner
GWP:dmv
Atch: 1. Conditions
2. Exhibits A, B and C
i
Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
CoWUMty Development Director
a
1. The development of the site stall be in confarnance with the bibLibits A,
8 and C oa:tained in the file for Plot Plan No. 95-JY4 , unless otherwise
a;rhead I R by the follvAng conditions.
2. um approved plot plan stall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it stall become null and void and of no effect uhataoeuer. By
"use" is =ant the beginning of substantial oanstructian, not Including
gradingperiod iud is thereafter diligently pursued to oo al whiCh In pletfon. with the
3. Water and sewage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with
the requirements of the Riverside amnty Health Department.
4. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the standards of the
Uniform Fire Code as adopted by the City of Ia Quints-
S. Prior to the issuance of a building permits the developer shall m t dt
and have approved, a detailed la►dscape Plan for the front yard showing
the species. sizes location and spacing of all planting materials, inc�luding
a minnimam of two (2), 15-cgallan, street trees. 2e plan stall iidiaate the
irrigation system and the location of the required three (3) outdoor water
spigots. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of 0ea4arny, the Applicant
stall install lardscaping in accordance with the approved lA scape plan.
All trees and plants stall be maintained in viable oadition for the life of
the approved use.
6. The heating and Cooling mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted, or
screened entirely by the roof structure.
7. Refuse oantaina z and bottled gas containers stall be Concealed by fencing
or landscaping.
G. 4he driveway stall be surfaced with ooncrete and have asphaltic concrete
connecting pavement (a 2" x 4" header) to the existing street pavement.
9. The Applicant shall obtain clearances and/or permits from the following
agencies prior to at mitting these plans to the Building Department for
plan A I :
" Riverside County Health Department
" City Fire Marshal
" Comnahity Development Department, Planning Division
° Desert Saris Unified Schhool District
10. 7 he Applicant snarl pay a school development fee as deteaminsd by the Desert
Saris Unified School District in accordance with the school Mitigation agree-
ment as approved by the City Council axd in effect at the time of issuance of
a building permit. A letter from Desert Sands Unified School District stating
that these fees have been paid shall be presented to the Community Development
Department, Building Division, prior to issuance of a bu; n ding permit.
11
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the planning Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: may 14, 1985
Subject: PLOT PLAN NO. 85-151
Location: Fast side of Avenida Randrez, 300 Feet South of Calle Colima
Applicant: Arthur Anderson
Request: Approval to Construct �a single -Family Dwelling Intended for
—
1. General plan: Low Density Residential (3-5 dwellings/acre).
2. Zoning: R-1*++ (One -Family Dwellings, 17' Height Limit, 1200-Square-Foot
Minimum Dwelling size).
3. Existing Conditions: The 50' x 100' lot is located on the east side of Avenida
Ramirez, 300-feet south of Calle Cl The surrounding area has been developed
with a variety of housing designs and roofing materials. Almost all homes in
the area are built on single lots.
4. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt from the require-
ments of the California Environmental Quality Act (CBQA) and a Notice of Exemption
will be filed with the County Recorder.
5. Description of Request: The Applicant, who is a contractor, is requesting approval
to construct a single-family house intended for rental purposes. This application
has been submitted concurrently with one other application. The Applicant has not
submtted any previous applications so he has no vacant homes in La Quinta.
The house has 1,590-square-feet of usable living area, with three beirol exceeding
the 10-foot clear dimension required, 1-3/4 baths and an attached, two -car garage
with a connecting pedestrian door leading into the house. The building will have
tan stucco siding and brown asphalt shingles. The house will be oriented opposite
to that shown on the plot plan. The overall height of the building is 16� feet.
The house will have a 20-foot front setback, a 16-foot rear setback, and 5-foot
sideyard setbacks. There are 24" eaves and a 4 and 12 pitch roof with low peaks.
STAFF PEPOW -PLANNING CCMMISSICN
May 141 1985
Page 2.
STAFF CU4 EIM AND ANALYSIS
The floor plan, height and siting of the house carplies with the R-1*++ zoning
requirements and the City's adopted minirman standards for single-family homes.
The house design is compatible with surrounding development and the roof style is
consistent. Art Anderson is proposing one other home directly next to this one, but
has agreed to provide minor alterations to the exterior of the other hone to add
variety. The house's size and bulk are carparable to that of surrounding dwellings.
FINDINGS
1. The request is consistent with the requirements of the R-1 zone and the goals
and objectives of the La Quinta General Plan.
2. The building design is compatible with the area development.
3. The project will not have a significant adverse inpact on the environment and
is categorically exempt from the requirments of the California Environmental.
Quality Act.
EUV-114MOUG i I i0gli• •
Based upon the above findings, the Camumty Development Department recommends approval
of Plot Plan No. 85-151 in accordance with Exhibits A. B and Cl and C21 and subject to
the attached conditions.
04. DID
l I I• / �• l
TJC:dmv
Atch: 1. Conditions
2. Exhibits A, B, Cl and C2
APP BY -
Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
Cammunity Development Director
SMS AP'PAOM IS SLIEL ' 70 7HE i=0W G CONDITIONS:
1. the developmart of the site shed be in conformance with the Ediibits A,
B, Cl aril C2 contained in the file for Plot Plan No. E5-151, unless otherwise
amended by the following conditions.
2. The approved plot plan shall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it shall became mill and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
"use" is meant the beginning of substantial Construction, not including
period and is�t thereafter diligently purer ampby this approval uhich is �letion. idth � ��
3. Water and sewage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with
the requirements of the Riverside County Health Department.
4. _Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the standards of the
uniform Fire Code as adopted by the City of la D nta.
S. prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit
and have approved, a detailed landscape plan for the front yard showing
the species, size, location and spacing of all planting materials, including
a ".;ninum of two (2), 15-gallon, street trees. The plan shall indicate the
irrigation system and the location of the required three (3) outdoor water
spigots. prior to the issuance of a Certificate of CCc4=1.cy, the Applicant
shall install landscaping in aeeordanoe with the approved landscape plan.
All traps and plants shall be maintained in viable Condition for the life of
the approved use.
6. The heating and Cooling mw1mlical egaiPfent shall be ground mounted' or
screened entirely by the roof structure.
7. Refuse containers and bottled gas containers shall be concealed by fencing
or landscaping.
S. The driveway shall be surfaced with concrete and have asphaltic concrete
connecting pavement (a 2" x 4" header) to the existing street pavement.
9. fie Applicant shall obtain clearances and/or permits from the following
agencies prior to submitting these plans to the Building Department for
plan deck:
e Riverside cmmty Health Department
e City Fire ltLrshal
e fwtmmity Development Department, Planning Division
o Desert Sands Unified School District
10. The Applicant shall pay a school development fee as determined by the Desert
Sands Unified School District in accordance with the school mitigation agree-
ment as approved by the City Council and in effect at the time of issuance of
a building permit. A letter from Desert Sands Unified School District stating
that these fees have been paid shall be presented to the camunity Development
Department, Building Division, prior to issuance of a building permit.
0
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA CUINTA
To: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Camuunity Development Department
Date: May 14, 1985
Subject: PLOT PLAN NO. 85-152
Location: Fast Side of Avenida Ramirez, 250' North of Calle Arroba
Applicant: Arthur Anderson
Request: Approval to Construct a Single -Family Dwelling Intended for
Rental Purposes
1. General Plan: Low Density Residential (3-5 dwellings/acre).
2. Zoning: R-1*++ (One -Family Dwelling, 17' Height Limit, 1200-Square-Foot
Minimum Dwelling Size) .
3. Existing Conditions: The 50' x 100' lot is located on the east side of Avenida
Ramirez, 250' north of Calle Arroba. The surrounding area has been developed
with a variety of housing designs and roofing materials. Almost all harks in
the area are built on single lots.
4. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt from the require-
ments of the California Ehviromrental Quality Act (CEQA) and a Notice of Exen ption
will be filed with the County Recorder.
5. Description of Request: The Applicant, who is a contractor, is requesting approval
to construct a single-family house intended for rental purposes. This application
has been submitted concurrently with one other application. The Applicant has not
submitted any previous applications, so he has no vacant hares in La Quinta.
The house has 1,590-square-feet of usable living area, with three bedrooms exceeding
the 10-foot clear dimension required, 1-3/4 baths and an attached two -car garage
with a connecting pedestrian door leading into the house. The building will have
ivory stucco and tan asphalt shingles. The overall height of the building is 16-,
feet. The house will have a 20-foot front setback, a 16-foot rear setback, and
5-foot sideyard setbacks. There are 24" eaves and a 4 and 12 pitch roof with low
peaks.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CONMSSION
May 14, 1985
Page 2.
STAFF COMMENM AND ANALYSIS
The floor plan, height and siting of the house camplies with the R-1*++ Zoning
requirenents and the City's adopted minimn standards for single-family hanes.
The house design is ompatible with surrounding development and the roof style is
consistent. The Applicant is proposing another single-family dwelling directly next
to this one, but has agreed to use different colors and add decorative stone work to
the exterior. finis should add sufficient variety between the two houses. The house
is canparable in size and bulk to that of surrounding dwellings.
1. The request is consistent with the requiremnts of the R-1 Zone and the goals
and objectives of the La Quinta General Plan.
2. The building design is compatible with area development.
3. The project will not have a significant adverse immpact on the envirorment and
is categorically exempt from the requirenents of the California Enviraynental
Quality Act.
Based upon the above findings, the Camm mity Development Departrrent recammends
approval of Plot Plan No. 85-152 in accordance with Exhibits A, B, Cl and C2, and
subject to the attached conditions.
v. , - DID
TJC:dmv
Atch: 1. Conditions
2. Exhibits A, B, Cl and C2
APP BY:
;r•A-
Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
Community Development Director
�016-*V' • , III • I •'. • •• �� • L
1. Um developnant of the site shall be in oonfa ntame with the Hdnibits A,
9, C1 and C2 contained in the file for P1ot.Plan No. 85-152, unless otherwise
amended by the following conditions.
2. The approved plot Plan shall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it shall baoome mill and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
"use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction, not including
grading, oontietplated by this approval whirl► is begun with the two-year
period and is thereafter diligently pursued to ocnpletion.
3. Water and sewage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance With
the requ=avants of the Riverside oounnty Health Deparbwrt.
4. Fire prvtectiann shall be provided in accordance with the standards of the
Uniform Fire Code as adopted by the City of la Quinta.
5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit
and have approved, a detailed landscape plan for the front yard showing
the species, size, lecatiCn and spacing of all planting materials, including
a minim= of two (2), B-gallon, street trees. Mw plan shall indicate the
irrigation system and the location of the required three (3) outdoor water
spigots. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Applicant
shall install landscaping in aocordannoe with the approved landscape plan.
All trees and plants shall be maintained in viable omt ti,on for the life of
the appxvved use.
6. The heating and cooling mechanical equipment shall be grand mounted, or
screened entirely by the roof structure.
7. Refuse containers and bottled gas containers shall be oaioealed by fencing
or landscaping.
B. The driveway shall be surfaced with cm=ete and have asphaltic concrete
connecting pavement (a 2" x 4" header) to the existing street pavement.
9. The Applicant shall obtain clearances and/or permits frown the following
agencies prior to submitting these plans to the Building Department for
plan check:
° Riverside county Health Department
° City Fire Marshal
° ommulity Develop=* Department, Planning Division
° Desert Saris Unified School District
10. The Applicant shall pay a school develcpnent fee as determined by the Desert
Sands Unified School District in accordance with the school mitigation agree-
ment as approved by the City Council and in effect at the time of issuance of
a building permit. A letter fray Desert Sands Unified School District stating
that these fees have been paid shall be presented to the Community Development
Department, Building Division, prior to issuance of a building permit.
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable Chainnan and Menbers of the Planning Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: May 14, 1985
Subject: PLOT PLAN NO. 85-153
Location: west Side of Avenida Juarez, 130' South of Avenida Montezuma
Applicant: Rick Johnson Construction
ReQUest: Approval to Construct a Single -Family Home Intended for Sale
BACKGROUND
1. General Plan: Low Density Residential (3-5 Dwelling Units Per Acre).
2. Zoning: R-1*++ (One -Family Dwellings, 17' Height Limit, 1200-Square-Foot
Minimum Dwelling Size).
3. Existing Conditions: The site is an approximately 8700-square-foot, partially
vegetated, vacant lot. The neighborhood is typical for cove development with
vacant lots and scattered housing. She proposed house is to be situated on one
lot as are five other houses on the block. The house to the southwest of the
site is situated on two lots. Existing development in the neighborhood consists
of conventional California Ranch and Spanish Villa style development, all having
sloping roofs.
4. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a Notice of Exemption will
be filed with the County Recorder.
5. Description of Request: The Applicant, who is a contractor, is requesting approval
to construct a single-family house intended for sale. The Applicant has received
approval for 13 other
x�fyear. cchll
been completed? iare under construction and, according to the Appliant,a
have been presold.
The house has well over 1300 square feet of usable living space with three
bedrooms, each exceeding 10-foot clear dimensions, two baths, and an attached,
two -car garage with a connecting pedestrian door. The house is to have an off-
white ("Meadow Brook") stucco exterior with brown trim. The house will incorporate
a sloping roof composed of brown and tan asphalt shingles. The eaves are to extend
out 24". The setbacks are as follows:
E
0
STAFF REPORT - PI.AMING COE-MSSICN
May 141 1985
Page 2.
° Front Setback - 20 Feet Off Avenida Juarez
° sideyard Setbacks - 5 Feet
° Rearyard Setback - 15 Feet +
The m3xinum house height is 16.5 feet.
STAFF CM ENTS AND DISCUSSION
The proposed house is very characteristic of the Applicant's previous developments,
incorporating the typical "California Ranch" style design. The house is to be sited
in a east -west orientation on one of the larger lots on the block. The Applicant's
proposal is compatible with siting of neighboring development. The overall design,
roof style, mass, bulk, and height of the proposed house is compatible with neighboring
development. The proposed house's floor plan complies with the R-1*++ Zoning and the
City's adopted minim,", standards for single-family dwellings.
FINDINGS
1. The project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
2. The request is consistent with the requirements of the R-1*++ Zone and goals
and objectives of the La Quinta General Plan.
3. The building design is compatible with the area development contingent upon
the conditions of approval.
STAFF MCOMMENDATIM
Based upon the above findings, the Community Develop ent Department recommends
approval of Plot Plan No. 85-153 in accordance with Exhibits A, B and C and subject
to the attached conditions.
cv.l--2 —
Gary W. Price
Associate Planner
GWP:dmv
Atch: 1. Conditions
2. Exhibits A, B and C
APPROVED BY:
5L 0-(//K,
Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
Community Develagnent Director
1. the development of the site atoll be in conformance with the Bdlibits A,
B and C contained in the file for Plot Plan No. 85-153 , Mess otherwise
amended by the following oaditians.
2. 2he approved plot plan shall be used within two years of the approval date]
otherwise, it shall became mill and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
"use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction, rot including
grading, contenplated by this approval which is begun with the two-year
period and is thereafter diligently pursued to completion.
3. Water and sewage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with
the requirements of the Riverside County Health Department.
4. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the standards of the
Unifc= Fire Code as adapted by the City of la Quints.
5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit
and have approved, a detailed landscape plan for the front yard showing
the species, size, location and spacing of all planting materials, including
a minimum of two (2), 15-gallon, street trees. The plan shall indicate the
irrigation system and the location of the required three (3) outdoor water
spigots. Prior to the issuance of a Oertificate of CCaupancy, the Applicant
shall install landscaping in accordance with the approved landscape plan.
All trees aid plants shall be maintained in viable conditim for the We of
the approved use.
6. 2w heating and Cooling mechanicalequipment shall be ground mamtsd, or
screened entirely by the roof structure.
7. Refuse containers and bottled gas Containers shall be concealed by fencing
or landscaping•
S. The driveway shall be surfaced with concrete and have asphaltic Concrete
correcting pavement (a 2" x 4" header) to the existing street pavement.
9. The Applicant shall obtain clearances and/or permits from the following
agues prior to submitting these plans to the Building Department for
plan check:
" Riverside Carty Health Department
° City Fire Dtwdkd
° Oomwnity Development Department, Planning Division
° Desert Sands Unified School District
10. The Applicant shall pay a school development fee as determined by the Desert
Sands Unified School District in accordance with the school mitigation agree-
ment as approved by the City Council and in effect at the time of issuance of
a building permit. A letter from Desert Sand s Unified School District stating
that these fees have been paid shall be presented to the Community Development
Department, Building Division, prior to issuance of a building permit.
L
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA OUINTA
To: one Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Cam ssion
From: Cmmnity Development Department
Date: May 14, 1985
Subject: PLOT PIM No. 85-154
Location: South Side of Avenue 46 (Westward Ho Drive), Approximately 450' West
of Roadrunner Lane.
Applicant: Richard Pescador
Request: Approval to Construct a Single -Family House for Applicant's Residence
1. General Plan: Low Density Residential (3-5 Dwelling Units/Acre).
2. Zoning: R-1 (One -Family Dwellings)
3. Existing Conditions: The 132' x 327' lot is located within the recently annexed
portion of La Quinta near the Westward Ho golf resort. Ilse project site is vacant
and generally flat with a minimal amount of native vegetation. The site contains
24 trees of various sizes and varieties. The proposed location of the house will
not disturb the existing tree locations. All surrounding properties are currently
vacant with the property across Westward Ho Drive, to the north of the site, having
an approved Planned Residential Development which includes a recreational vehicle
park, golf course and two-story condominiums (City of Indio - "Indian Springs Resort").
4. Environmental Considerations: The project is categorically exempt from the require-
ments of the California Environmental Quality Act (CE7w pursuant to Section 15303
of the CEQA guidelines. A Notice of Exenption will be filed with the County Recorder
contingent upon approval of the project.
5. Related Case: Parcel Map 18629, approved by the County on September 30, 1984, prior
to the site's annexation into La Quinta, subdivided a two -acre, gross area lot into
two separate lots. The project site consists of Parcel #1, the .90-acre lot to the
east, a portion of Parcel Map 18629. All conditions related to Parcel Map 18629
have been met to enable the Applicant to proceed with construction of a single-
family house.
6. Description of Request: The Applicant is requesting approval to construct a
single-family house for his personal residence.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION
May 14, 1985
Page 2.
The proposed house has 1,789-square-feet of usable floor area with three bedrooms,
two bathrooms, a utility roan and an attached garage with a connecting pedestrian
door into the family roan. Maximum building height is 14 feet. Two covered patios
are to be provided along the southeast sides of the house. An additional west
sideyard covered patio is also to be provided. The proposed house is to incorporate
4 and 12 sloping Spanish tile roof with lame 24" overhangs. The design of the house
is typical California Ranch style integrating some interesting details, such as an
arched entryway, an arched window (left side elevation), and covered patios supported
with columns. The house will have a white stucco exterior. The garage is set off
to the side with the driveway off Westward Ho Drive taking a 90-degree turn into the
garage from the west sideyard.
The setbacks are as follows:
° Front Yard - 20 Feet (from Westward Ho Drive)
° Sideyards - 37 Feet
° Rear Yard - 220 Feet +
SMFF COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS
Although the project site is not located in an area subject to the City's adopted
standards for single-family houses, the house meets all requirements of the R-1*++
Zone.
There are no buildings within 500 feet of the proposed house site. However, those
developments in visual range of the proposed project utilize similar compatible design
features, including white stucco exteriors and sloping Spanish style roofs. The house
is sited with a north -south orientation. The use of large 24" roof overhangs and east
and west attached, covered patios in addition to the existing shade trees in the side -
yards will provide excellent shading to minimize sun exposure.
The garage, pedestrian access door opens inward towards the garage which may cause
doorway opening conflicts with parked vehicles. It is suggested that this door be
redesigned to open inward towards the house.
Overall, the proposed house is compatible with the surrounding development. The
overall design, roof style, mass, bulk and height of the proposed project is compatible
with existing and future development.
ICU I�,R,
1. The project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
2. The request is consistent with the requirements of the R-1*++ Zone and goals
and objectives of the La Quinta General Plan.
3. The building design is compatible with the area development contingent upon the
conditions of approval.
STAFF rWM - PLANNING COMMISSION
May 14, 1985
Page 3.
a • i� •. ��
Based upon the above findings, the Ccmmznity Development Department recamiends
approval of Plot Plan No. 85-154 in accordance with Exhibits A, B and C and subject
to the attached conditions.
..4DI a1•
Gary W. Price
Associate Planner
GWP:dmv
Atch: 1. Conditions
2. Exhibits A, B and C
APPROVED BY:
/'�`" O-e.//;I"
Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
CommuLity Develop rant Director
1. 'fie development of the site shall be in conformance with the Ednibits A,
B and C contained in the file for Plot Plan No. 85-154 , unless otherwise
amended by the follcxrinng conditions.
2. 'fie approved plot plan shall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it shall became null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
"use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction, not including
�tr this approval uhicii is begun with the two-year
period and isdiligently pursued to
3. pater and sewage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with
the requirements of the Riverside County Health Department.
4. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the standards of the
Uniform Fire Code as adapted by the City of la Quinta.
5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit
and have a detailed landscape plan for the front yard showing
he species, si�'ze, location and spacing of all planting materials, including
a mininum of two (2)# 15-9allon, street trees. The plan shall indicate the
irrigation system and the location of the required three (3) outdoor water
spigots. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Oea4an07, the Applicant
shall install landscaping in accordance with the approved landscape plan.
All trees and plants shall be maintained in viable condition for the life of
the approved use.
6. 1lne ideating and Cooling mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted, or
screened entirely by the roof Structure.
7. Refuse containers and battled gas Containers shall be concealed by fencing
or landscaping. .
S. Ow driveway shall be surfaced with concrete and have asphaltic concrete
connecting pavement (a 2" x 4" header) to the existing street pavement.
9. The Applicant shall obtain clearances and/or permits from the following
agencies prior to agnitting these plans to the Building Department for
plan check:
° Riverside County Health Department
° City Fire Marshal
" Community Development Department, Planning Division
Desert Sands Unified School District
10. The Applicant shall pay a school development fee as determined by the Desert
Saris Unified School District in accordance with the school mitigation agree-
ment as approved by the City Council and in effect at the time of issuance of
a building permit. A letter from Desert Sands Unified School District stating
that these fees have -been paid shall be presented to the Community Development
Department, Building Division, prior to issuance of a building permit.