1983 02 08 PCi!UI
A G E N D A
PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QDINTA
A regular meeting to be held at the
La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado,
La Quinta, California
February 8, 1983
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
2. ROLL CALL„ p�'c
3. tF—E RINGS
7:00 p.m.
1
� A./ A public hearing regarding Tentative Tract Hap No. 18766, for
property located on Eisenhower Drive, southerly from Avenue 50,
Landmark Land Company, A✓plicLnt.
1. Report from the Planning Staff.
2. Motion for continuance.
B A public hearing regarding Conditional Use Case No. 83-001, a
request to install an off -site sign advertising subdivision sales
on property located at the southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive
yea and Avenue 50, Anden Corporation, Applicant.
I��Jv 1. Report from the Planning Staff.
2. Motion for approval.
4. CONSENT CAIrIND R
Qn n y �� Approval of the Minutes of the regular meeting of January 11, 1983
nG
1� hi I _(by �-� and Minutes of the adjourned meeting of January 2_5, 1983-
fi JV
6t`l
43 5. BUSIYESS
6. ADJOURM?9;14T
ITEM NO.
DATE ` r' 3
PL:ANNIl1G
CO"IMISSTON MEETING
RE:--
A10Ti0N hY: GOETCHPIUS IMIK-*11? KIAI,KIEtdICZ RFILb THORNBURGH
SECOND BY: GOETCHEUS Ii•9C -lp KLIS1}:IEidICZ REILLY THORI�BIJRGH
DISCUSSi.ON:_----
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO) - J;O:"'-RS: AYE NO ,S.-.'-.IN PRESENT
GOETCHLUS -- --
".liK. Al✓iP -- -- -- — - —
KL1:'KJ i_WICZ -" - — - - --
I2EILLY - -- --- — - —
TEoF.'�BLRGH ... - - --- -- — ---
LINANI'iOUSLY Ali0i'IED: YES__ NO __
41
ITEM NO
DATE
PLANNING C0.41ISSION MEETING
HE
MOTION BY: GOETCHEUS IMfK NP KLI`1KIEWICZ REILLY
SECOND BY: GOETCHEUS T�K MP KLIMKIEWICZ REILLY
DISCUSSION:
----- ------ --
ROLL
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO='`iISSIO\P.RS:
GOETCHEUS
T rK.,Np
KLTax 1:)A ICZ
REILLY
THORNBURGII
L'r::LNli90USLY ADO-PTED
AYE NO
YES
%_BST? IN
21 ES\T
THORtiBURGH
THORNBURGH
TIRESENT
ITEM NO. �l
DATE
PLANNING C0.-2111ISSION MEETING
RE: ---
MOTION BY: GOETCHEUS llfKkl'P
K1,11VIEWICZ
EILLY
THORNBURGH
SECOND BY: GOETCHEUUSSf,� IrLKklllm
KLP`1KIl?WICZ
THORNBU/�RGH
1)1 SCUSSIO\:��`j�1�v� -�
- `�/�.
RREILLY
G'-�
C�L, /'M.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO`STSSICL�6R5; AYE NO ABSTAIN P.BSENT P-PESFNT
GOETCHEUS --- ---
L"7�AMP ---- -- - - -- --
KLII•fKIPW7CZ .. - --- - - -- ----
RE.ILLY _ -- - -
THOR.NBURGH - --- ---
UV-ANIMGUSI,Y P�JOP'IFD: 'IES_ __ NO
�mmT
o�
U �
CF'�f OF TfIE°w
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
11
To: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Sandra Bonner, Associate Planner
Date: February 8, 1983
3. As
Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 18766, Landmark Land Company — A Request
to Divide 15.5 Acres Into Three Lots for the Purpose of Constructing 32
Statutory Condominium Units
The applicant, Landmark Land Company, has requested that the Planning Commission
continue consideration of this case to the March hearing. Approval of this
request would provide additional time for both the staff and applicant to review
the proposal.
RECOA?CNDATION
That the Planning Commission continue Tentative Tract Map No. 18766 to the
Mec�lY 1983 hearing.
SLB:dmv
ITEM NO. 3 13
DATE "V' q-
PL_NNNING (CCOO•�L*1IgSSTON MEETING
RE: ---- _ _—� ®
MOTION BY: GOET.CHEUS Ih1KAIKI) KLIMKIEh'ICZ REILLY THORNBURGH
SECOND BY: EU GOETCHS I^_KAMP KLT',fKIE'::I/CZ REILLY THORNBURGH
DISCi'SSTON: e�.z"we—
Vx8_
g�
--
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO''.^11��a-��..^�n3S: AYE NO
GOETCIIEUS
---
TMKAAiP
- — -- --
KLI ' ,] r', i CZ
-. — - -
REILEY
THORSBL3GH
_� _ —
ABSTAIN . i;S-NT PRESENT
UNAJ I210USLY ADOPTED: YES - -- 10. --
0
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
3 o t_ *
From: Sandra Bonner, Associate Planner
Date: ]February 81 1983
Subject: Conditional Use Case No. 83-001, A Request by Anden Corporation to
Install an Off -site Sign Advertising the Original Sale of a Subdivision
The applicant is reouestin .approval to install an off -site sign at the southeast
co'_'ner of :'mil seZ'10:;er Drive and Avenue 50 for the r)lar Dose of advertising home sales
iv_thin the .Manta Rosa Cove de �elopment. The dimensions of the proposed sign are
6 foot by 10 foot with an overall height of 11 feet. The Municipal Land Use
Ordinance allows off -site subdivision signs advertising the original sale of a
subdivision provided a conditional use permit is approved (see attached excerpt
_`rom ordinance).
T .2e applicant recently obtained approval to install an on -site morn meat sign in
front of the guard house for Santa Rosa Cove, -..inch is located across Eisenhower
Drive from the site of the proposed off -site sign. The approved monument sign has
an overall length of 18 feet with an average height of 3 feet and will be visible
to traffic travelling along Eisenhower Drive. In addition, there is an e)dsting
;:all -mounted identification sign at the south side of the project entrance which
is visible to vehicles travelling westward on =venue 50.
ADDrODrlateness of the Proposed Sign
Staff suggests that the Planning Commission first discuss the issue of ..`nether an
off --site advertising sign should be permitted at the proposed location. Although
the lend use ordinance permits a raytim m of two off -site signs, the PLP ing
Commission has the authority to determine if the proposed sign is an appropriate
t :.par, y use "or the location. One option the Commission may wish to discuss is
the limiting or prohibition of off -site advertising signs for individual develop-
ments, and instead have a smaller number of monument signs listing a number of
developments. This means is used within the City of Rancho ldrage which has a
°9;ode1 Homes Tour", with large monument signs nroviding the names and directional
a_:ows for residential oevelonnc-ats within the vicinity. These signs are-nstalled
and maintained by the local Che_nber of Cor_erce. 'ihis approach has the advantage
that as the number of residential developments increase, the number of signs -will
not significantly increase.
The Honorable Chairman end Members of the Planning Commis
February 8, 1983
Page Two.
Size of the Proposed Sign
If the Commission determines that it supports the installation of the proposed sign
at this location, then the proposed design and size of sign should be reviewed next.
The applicant is requesting approval of a sign with a 6 foot by 10 foot sign face
and an overall height of 11 feet. The sign face will be white with green and gold
lettering. As a means of comparison, the following is a list of existing subdivision
signs along Eisenhower Drive south of Avenida Fernando:
a Club La Quinta, 3' by 51, height from curb is 6J'
• La Quinta Hotel, 3' by 51, height 6' ion
• Santa Rosa -Cove Models, 4' by 81, height is 11'
• La Quinta Hotel Golf Club, 3' by 41, height 7'
• La Quinta Country Club, 7' 10n by 1' 417, height
As shown by the list above, there are no existing signs having a sign face area
comparable to the 60 square feet requested by the applicant. Staff recommends that
the size of' the proposed sign be reduced to 3' by 5' on the grounds that it would be
consistent with other signs in the vicinity. In addition, since two on -site signs
for Santa Rosa Cove will be located directly across Eisenhower Drive from the proposed
site, the main purpose of this sign is directional. Therefore, a sign —aller than
that requested would be appropriate.
Concerning the design of the sign face, Staff has no objection to the proposed layout.
However, a reco=endation is that the background be painted a subtle earthtone color
rather than white. This use of an ear-thtone background is desirable because although
the sign's viyDse is to attract attention, it should be subtle because it is located
within a residential area. Also, colors other than white will show the dirt less and
give the sign a neater appearance over the course of time.
The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
February 81 1983
Page Three.
Conditions of Approval
1. The development of the site shall be in accordance with the approved exhibits
as contained in the file for Conditional Use Case No. 83-001.
2. The sign shall be located a minimum of ten feet back from property lines and
shall not interfere with the line of sight of motorists.
qr g/
3. The sign face shall be no larger than,3�'bykl�and have an overall height from
grade ofj7'feet.
4. The sign face shall be painted in accordance with Exhibit C using an earthtone
background color approved by the Planning Commission or Director of Community
Development.
5. Prior to installing this sign, all existing advertising signs for Santa Rosa
Cove shall be brought into compliance with Section 19.6 of the Municipal Land
Use Ordinance. Proof of this compliance shall be presented to the City Planning
Division prior to the issuance of a building permit.
6. The sign shall not be artificallly lighted.
7. The sign shall be maintained in good repair.
8. The use hereby approved by this permit shall terminate on February 8,.19&5-.
9. The applicant shall sign an agreement with the City, secured by a $100 cash
bond, assuring the removal of the sign within the allowed time period. The
bond and agreement shall be filed with the Community Development Department
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
RE:
ITEM NO
DATE
PLAN�N�JRI GCO'ITUSSION MEETING
f2M �J�C v _
MOTION
COETCHEUS
I4TYN:1PK7:I;f�
EILLY
TAORNAURGH
SECOND
BY:
.BY:
GOETCHEUS
(1MKAMP /
KLI?`K7hiJICZ
REILLY
T110t:NBURGH
DIscliSSiON:
-----------
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO'S.iiSSJO`a,t.S: AYE NO r. S1AIN AP.SENI PRESENT
GOETUEUS
I24:AMP -- - -- —
KI IXK 11',141 CZ -- _ -- --- --
RFI-LLY __— --- -----
U^�IileIMOUSLY :`:DOPIER: YES__--
® M I N D T E S AM
PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta
City Hall, 78-105 Calla Estado, La Quinta,
California
January 11, 1983 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. The flag salute was led by Commissioner Imkamp.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Goetcheus, Imkamp, Klimkiewicz, Reilly
and Chairman Thornburgh
Absent: None
3. HEARINGS:
A. The City Manager explained the Public Hearings regarding a Change of Zone
and Tentative Tract Map No. 18767 and related Environmental Assessments
#16680 and 16633 for property on the southerly side of Avenue 50 between
Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street; Landmark Land Company, Applicant.
The City Manager introduced Sandra Bonner, Associate Planner, who presented
the staff report regarding Tentative Tract Map No. 18767 and Change of Zone
Case No. 3379, which recommended approval of the Change of Zone and approval
of Tentative Tract Map No. 18767, subject to various amendments to the
conditions.
Chairman Thornburgh invited comments from the Applicant, Landmark Land
Company. Kevin Manning, Planner for Landmark Land Company, addressed the
Commission explaining the concerns presented by staff and the Commission,
and further discussed various staff conditions for this tract.
Chairman Thornburgh opened the hearing to public comment. Comment was
heard from the following persons:
1. Audrey Ostrowsky, 77-400 Calls Sinoloa, La Quinta, referred to her
letter written to the City Manager and members of the City Council
wherein she requested that all major construction be halted immediately
until a time frame has been scheduled for completion of the sewer plant.
She also expressed concern regarding the heavier traffic flow that would
be generated from this project.
The City Manager E=.xplained that we had received satisfactory arswars from
the Coachella slater District and from the California Water Resources board,
which supervises the suitability of the temporary treatment facility; that
it is sufficient and has the capacity to serve both those properties which
are presently on the lines and those properties, including this development,
which will be on the line at the completion of the development. The City
Manager stated he received an estimate from the California Resources Board
indicating an additional capacity of at least 1,000 dwelling units and this
particular project is for an 82 dwelling unit capacity.
2. Bill Bird, P.O. Box 837, La (':zinta, expressed his concern re density. Re
qu::�ti.oned the developer as to why they felt they had to build two-story
traits, instead of one story, above dike level.
Chairman Thornburgh explained that the density re this project is excellent
and felt it was not a problem, per plans submitted.
Kevin Manning, Planner for Landmark Land Company, explained that the
acreage involved is 26.8 and zoning allows for 134 units on the property
and Landmark is putting up 50 units less than what is allowed by the
density on the property.
3. Dick Matlock, 77-965 Lego Drive, La Quinta, questioned whether or not the
density figures included the golf course also.
Chairman Thornburgh explained that we use the total acreage of the project
to determine density.
:/
8
MINUTES - Planning Commission
January 11, 1983
Page Two.
Andy Vossler, Landmark Land Company, explained the density is 4.6 on the
acreage that is in Lot 1, which is the condominiums. The density figured
on Lot 1 and Lot 2 is 3 per acre, so the maximum density any way you figure
is 4.6 per acre.
4. Roxie Yessayien, 49-055 Avenida Anselmo, La Quinta, questioned the number
of units on the dike compared to the number of units across from them.
5. Juanita Gayer, 49-845 Lego, La Quinta, questioned why the bedrooms in the
units to be built on the dike had to be on the third story. She felt they
could be on the street level and living quarters on top of the dike for
scenic view purposes, thus making a two-story instead of three-story unit.
She felt the three-atory structures would block the scenic view from the
Lagos, where she resides.
Andy Vossler, Landmark Land Company, in answer to the above, requested
permission of the Commission to present profile plats for their and the
public's view. He stated this profile makes it very clear that from the
Lagos, you will not be able to see the units on the dike and the units
on the dike will see the units closest to Avenue 50.
6. Adele Bremlett, 49-885 Lago Drive, La Quints, asked if this project was
going to extend all the way to Eisenhower Drive.
Chairman Thornburgh advised that it would not extend that far.
7. Rupert Yessayien, P. 0. Box 251, La Quints, stated he had no objections
to this project and felt it would be an asset to the Community complementing
Landmark Land Company on the quality of their projects. He was primarily
concerned with the landscaping of the project, feeling that we are being
faced with a water shortage here in the desert. He felt that less land-
scaping or a desert --type landscaping should be more appropriate than
requiring more green belts that take much irrigation, therefore depleting
our water supply. He also felt that the sewage problem mentioned previously
may pose a problem eventually.
There being no further public comment, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
After discussion regarding various tract map conditions of approval, the following
changes to the conditions were approved.
NO. 1„ Changed to Read: 50th Avenue road easements shall be offered for
dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the
governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications
shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer.
Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner.
N0. 5„ Changed to Read: Street trees shall be planted along all public road
frontages. A landscaping, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway
layout and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director
for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The landscape
plan shall include a substantial number of Hill size trees. A minimum
of one tree per unit, no smaller than. the height of the unit adjacent
thereto shall be planted and maintained. All air-conditioning units
sha11 be ground mounted. No final inspection or occupancy shall be
given by the Building Department to this project until the aforemen-
tioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed.
30. 7. (From Road Department Letter) Delete.
NO. 24. Changed to Read: The entrance street shall be expanded to provide
for two access lanes and one exit lane, with a median for security
facilities and gates, if applicable. The gates shall be located
to provide a minimum two -car storage as measured between the gate
and the curb face along Avenue 50. The design of street, gates and
entryway shall be submitted to and approved by the City Community
Development Department and City Engineer prior to the issuance of
any development permits.
MINUTES - Planning Commission
January 11, 1983
Page Three.
FOR THE RECORD: With regard to Condition No. 24 previously written,
Chairman Thornburgh stated that the Commission can require that the
entryway and location of gates be redesigned or relocated at the
time the adjacent property is developed. Andy Vossler, Landmark
Land Company representative, agreed to this requirement.
Change of Zone Request from R-2-8000, R-1 and R-5 to R-2-8000 and R-5: After
a shoat discussion, it was moved by Commission Imkamp and seconded by Commissioner
Klimkiewiez to approve this request. Unanimously approved.
Due to the fact that the Commission and Applicant could not agree entirely
with Condition No. 15 in regard to setback requirements, the Commission agreed
to review an alternative theory; that being a reduction in the width of Avenue
50. Landmark Land Company agreed to submit a preliminary street plan showing
this theory to the Commission. Therefore, s motion was made by Commissioner
Imkamp and seconded by Commissioner Klimkiewicz to continue consideration of
Tentative Tract Map No. 18767 to an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to be held Tuesday, January 25, 1983, at 7:00 p.m., in Commission
Chambers. Unanimously approved.
3B. The City Manager explained that the Applicant, Landmark Land Company,
has requested a continuance of the Public Hearing regarding Tentative
Tract Map No. 18766, so they may submit further exhibits to staff.
Therefore, Co_smissionar Imkam_p moved and Commissioner Klimkiewicz seconded
that this hearing be continued to Tuesday, February 8, 1983, at 7:00 p.m.,
a regular meeting time of the Planning Commission. Unanimously approved.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by Commissioner Goetcheus, seconded by Commissioner Klimkiewicz, to
approve the Consent Calendar. Unanimously approved.
A. The Minutes of the regular meeting of December 14, 1982, were approved
as submitted.
5. s11SI'�SS SESSION
A. The City Manager explained the proposed revisions to the proposed
ordinance regarding Valet Parking.
Chairman Thornburgh op=ned the hearing to Public Comment.
David Irwin, Attorney representing LandUmark Land Company, stated that
he had no problem with the modifying of an ordinance and applying it
to new applications, but to take an ordinance such as this one and
assume it to be retroactive was disagreeable to him.
Com-issioner Reilly stated that .she cou.ld see no reason for the Planning
Commission to concern itself with the logistics of the disposition of
patrons' vehicles unless failure of the Commission to intervene would
result in some hazard or abuse to the public.
Co; missi.oner Kli.-__iewicz stated t at he could not-m-cport an ordinance
that did not solve .a problem and feels that it is 'onnecessary interferc.ce
in private enterprise.
Chairman Thornburgh closed the Public Hearing.
A motion was then rade by Commissioner Goetcheus and seconded by
Commissioner Reilly to reco:Lmend to City Council to reject this proposed
ordinance.
Roll Call
AYES: Commissioners Goetcheus, Imkamp, Klimkiewicz and Reilly
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Chairman Thornburgh
Ydy% PES - Planning Commission
January 17-, 1983
Page Four.
• 1 IP. Elul �Y
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of La Quints.
vas adjourned to the meeting of January 25, 1983, at 7:00 P.M. at La Quinta
City Hall, 78-105 Calls Estado, La Quinta, California.
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, was adjourned at 10:25 P.m-, January 11, 1983, at La Quinta City
Hall, 78-105 Calls Estado, La Quinta, California.
M I N U T E S
PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QUINTA
An adjourned meeting held at the La Quints.
city Hall, 78-105 Calls Eatado, La,Quinta,
California
January 25, 1983 7100 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. The flag salute was led by Commissioner Imkamp.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commiussioners Goetcheus, Imkamp, Reilly and Chairman Thornburgh
Absent: Commissioner Klimkiewicz
Moved by Commissioner Imkamp, seconded by Commissioner Goetcheus,
to excuse Commissioner Klimkiewicz. Unanimously adopted.
3. HEARINGS
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
5. BUSINESS SESSION
A. The City Manager explained that the hearing regarding Zone Change 3879
and Tentative Tract Map No. 18767 had been ruled upon with approval at
The Planning Commission meeting of January 11, 1983. This meeting is
being held as the Planning Commission requested a continuance of the
above regular meeting to further study additional information to be
submitted to them by the applicant, Landmark Land Company, for property
located on the south side of Avenue 50, between Eisenhower Drive and
Washington Street. The City Manager then introduced Sandra Bonner,
Associate Planner, who presented two reports outlining the tract and a
synopsis of the various planning conditions.
1. Sandra Bonner presented the staff report addressing the concerns of
the Planning Commission which resulted in this continued session so
that a more thorough study could be made of the building heights,
design of entryway, additional landscaping along Avenue 50 and the
location and design of the wall. Based upon the findings presented
to the Commission by Ms. Banner, staff recommended that the Planning
Commission approve Tentative Tract Map No. 18767 in accordance with
Exhibits Al B, C and D and subject to conditions of approval, as
amended.
In Ms. Bonner's report, she stated that she met with the City
Engineer and his findings with regard to the redesign of the roadway
along Avenue 50 met with his approval, that it would increase safety
and be in the best interests of the community.
Chairman Thgrnb;;srgh invited comments from the Applicant, Landmark
Land Company. Kevin Manning, Planner for Landmark Land Company,
addressed the Coarlission expressing Landmark's thanks to staff and
the commission for their diligence in processing this application
and for their input at the initial hearing.
Chairman Thornburgh opened the meeting to public comment.
Bill Camm, 49-847 Coachella Drive, La Quinta, President of the
Islands Homeowner's Association, expressed his concerns regarding
the narrowing of Avenue 50 by 6 feet, no bike paths, and the wall
setback at the entrance of this project. He was also concerned that
this project request could be brought before the Commission to conclude
about its adequacy without having filed the General Plan for the develop-
ment of this entire area.
Juanita Gayer, 49-845 Lago, La Quints, stated she agreed with Mr. Camm's
comments and also wanted to know why there had not been a future traffic
count.
MINUTES - Planning Commission
January 25, 1983
Page Two.
Kevin Manning, representative of Landmark Land Company, responded to
Mr. Camm's concerns stating that Condition No. 26 provides for a bike
golfcart path along the south side of Avenue 50. Regarding Mr. Cam's
question re the setback of the wall at the entryway of the project,
Mr. Manning stated that their plan provides for a tapering back of the
wall to alleviate any traffic situations. Mr. Manning stated that the
6 feet of roadway Mr. Carom referred to is being used for an additional
6 foot setback. In answer to Mrs. Gayer's question, Mr. Manning stated
that at the time of initial presentation of this project to the County
of Riverside Planning Department, the County Staff felt there was no
need for an additional traffic survey as Landmark was going to be
conditioned to widen the road.
Commissioner Klimkiewicz arrived to take his seat on the Commission
at this time.
Mr. Camm then asked if the bike/golfcart path would be inside or outside
of the planned roadway.
The City Manager replied that the bike/golfcart path would be within
the planned roadway. He fu:-ther commented in answer to Mrs. Gayer's
concern of a traffic count for future use. With present usage, there
seems to be no reason for a count at this time. Ultimately, there will
be traffic control devices, funded by the applicant through development
fees, located at the intersection of Washington & 'venue 50, Eisenhower
& Avenue 50 and Eisenhower and Washington Street. The types of devices
and times when they are to be placed at these locations depends on some
traffic engineering surveys which are just now being started. The City
Manager further stated for the Planning Commission and public informa-
tion, the City Co-azcil has already expressed a concern regarding the
traffic impact at Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street, with a strong
desire to have some type of stop signing at least initially there. We
have not yet established sufficient funds for a traffic signal at that
location, but what we will probably be putting in are stop signs with
flashing red lights at that three -a -ay intersection.
Go_yn.issioner Reilly questioned if the changing o£ the ro d:'ay would
cost t e City anything end a'so astiad if there :3ould be :ny advantage
to having desert type landscaping in lieu of cinat Landmark was reouesting
as far as saving space, thus not making it necessary to have such a large
setback.
Staff adri sea Co missionsr Rai-lly that there world be no cent to the City
for the redesign of the ro.d ;_y, Co)urissioner Tho-mb advised her
there was no advantage to having desert type landscaping.
Mr. Ca*�m requested to know if the bike/go Lrcart path would be used for
._
-,ay traffic.
The City Manager replied that this would be true and that it is permiss_ble.
Audrey Ostrcwski, 77-400 Calls Sinoloa, La 0,uinta, asked if the bike/goifcart
path were one and the same and if so, she felt that this was a dangerous
si"¢ation.
staff advised that the path would be used for both types of ve'nicls travel.
Commissioner Imkamp wondered if the security gate was to come all the
way out to the public right of way and requested more information with
regard to this gate area.
Kevin Manning of Landmark Land Company further explained the security
gate area with regard to landscaping and the wall design.
Chairman Thornburgh requested that the Commission be shown the landscaping
plan when it is presented to staff, just as a point of review.
MINUTES - Planning Commission
January 25, 1983
Page Three.
Commissioner glimkiewicz commented that he would like to see developers
give serious consideration to the desert type of landscaping using plants
indigenous to this area which use less water. He stated he finds it more
practical now when we are all worried about water shortages.
Commissioner Goetcheus congratulated the applicant for this subdivision
which he felt appropriately nice for La Quinta. He felt, however, that
it would not be appropriate for this Commission to change the plan of
the 76-foot wide roadway. He felt that they would be giving away road-
way that the county thought was necessary. Commissioner Goetcheus stated
that he would not be in favor of reducing the 76 feet that we are pledged
to retain.
Chairman Thornburgh stated that he would like to commend staff and
Landmark Land Company for coming up with a solution when the Commission
requested a larger setback for Avenue 50. Originally, the county only
required a 12-foot setback, but after our incorporation when this pro-
ject had to come before the La Quinta Planning Commission, we felt the
setback inad&q ate. Therefore, for the City to get what we wanted and
Landmark to get what they want is of benefit to us all.
There being no further public comment, Chairman Thornburgh closed the
public hearing.
After a short discussion regarding the tract map conditions of approval,
the following change to Condition No. 15 was approved.
NO. 15. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the developer shall
construct a six -foot -high decorative block wall along Avenue 50
which will be no less than 18 feet from the curb face. Plans
showing the location and design of the wall, the landscaping of
the setback and right of way areas and the location of the four -
foot -wide sidawalk shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Department of Community Development prior to the issuance
of any permits. These plans shall be presented to the Planning
Cv-:_issien for their review.
2. Co: _rdssio, ier,'-�_=�np a ade a ;_iotion to approve Tentative Tract Map No.
18767 in acco_-dance with the approved Exhibits A, B, C and D, and
subject to conditions of approval as amended. Commissioner iilimkiewicz
seconded this motion. This motion was approved on a vote of 4 ayes and
one nay.
B. The City Manager explained that the second item on the agenda was Plot Plan
83•-001, a request for a golf course equipment storage facility on property
located at the southeast corner of Avenida Ultimo and the Washington Street
Bridge embankment, L n mesk Land Ce*apenv, Applicant. The City Manager stated
that after a concers tion , the City Attorney, it was apparent that the
type of approval needed for this plot plan is administrative and therefore
up to him to ;cake the final approval. However, a public administrative hear-
ing is required, but having misunderstood the requirements of the code, we
eet this application up for a Planning Commission hearing. Therefore, we
will 1!ear cc..=eats at this meet ing and get an advisory co±- eat from the
On.
The The City Manager f=Miaer explained that the establishment of an equip-:=_nt
storage facility at this location has been approved by the City Council. A
public hearing was held by them where it was determined that the location of
this building, being adjacent to the golf course, was appropriate. The
applicant has come to us with a request in three regards:
1. Location of gasoline pumps to be used solely for the fueling of
maintenance equipment, which will be stored in this facility.
2. The reduction of required parking spaces from 8 to 6.
3. Change in roof structure from flat to peaked.
This will be strictly a storage building. No Air-conditioning units or
other items will be placed in or on the building.
MINUTES - Planning Commission
January 25, 1983
Page Four.
Commissioner Goetcheus commented that we have received several letters
in regard to this request from property owners in the area who seem to
feel that the value of their property would be reduced in value should
this be approved.
The City Manager explained that when the golf course was built, the
property values increased and as this facility is basically necessary
to maintain that very golf course, he did not feel that the property
values would decrease. In answer to other questions, the City Manager
stated that this building would house lawnmowers, tractors, related
6� ��✓ golf course equipment and tools inside the building only. He further
commented that the two fuel pumps stored only 500 gallons each, 1 for
diesel and 1 for regular gasoline, and that the pumps were necessary
to prevent having to bring in a fuel truck onto the premises. The
�j Fire Marshall from Riverside County and our own Safety Coordinator have
reviewed these plans and approved them.
e c
Acommissioner Imkamp requested to know why the large door and the green-
belt at the rear of facility were necessary.
l�rt�d Kevin Manning, Planner for Landmark Land Company, stated that the large
door is for the purpose of having a truck enter the building to empty
the septic tank. Further, the greenbelt would be very much reduced
due to the fact that staff is requesting that the parking spaces remain
at 8 instead of 6.
pp J� Commissioners Imkamp and Reilly both commented that they would rather
see this building on the golf course area rather than across the street
as they did not feel that this was "adjacent" to the golf course.
C. Sandra Boner, Associate Planner, presented the staff report regarding
Plot Plan 83-003, a request for construction of a single-family dwelling
on property located at 53-1,60 Avenida Rubio, Bruce Hatton, Applicant.
She explained the factors to be considered in reviewing the proposed
house's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. These included
siting, bpi ding design, building nater-'als and 12-n_dscaping. Based on
the find-ings of these factors, staff recommends that the P1:_Ining
Co mission approve this plot plan.
After a short discussion period regarding the conditions Of approval, the
following change to Condition No. 6 was approved.
T.ro. 6. The applicant shall be req:,_rad to post a cash bond, perfor-ance
bond or ether financial arranbenent acceptable to the City Attorney
and City Engineer, with the City Co:'mu_,ity De-aalopyant Department
for the installation of to required street improvements along
Avenida Rubio, including curb, gutter and connecting pavement.
The ano-mt of this cash boy d shall be . 2,000, wkiich shall be suS-
aitted to end accepted by the City of La Quintals Director of
Comunity Development and City Manager prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
Commissioner Goetcheus made a ;notion to approve PJ.ot Plan 83 003 subject
to Conditions of approval as amended. Cc: issicner Reilly seconded the
.1 U _on. unani-,ously : &opted.
6. AD,i OUIL'NT
The adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Le. Quints. ,Ms
adjourned to the meeting of Tuesday, February 8, 1983, at 7:00 p.m., in La
Quints. City Hall, 78-105 Calls Estado, La Quinta, California.
The adjourned meeting of the Planning Co=ssion of the City of La Quanta was
adjourned at 9:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 25, 1983, at La Quints. City Hall,
78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California.
ITEM NO.
DATE "7- %r
PLANNING COMIISSION MEETING
RE: --
MOTION BY: GOEICI3EUS I,,KA*4P KLI>SKIEi,'ICZ REILLY
SECOND BY: GOETCHEUS l"^P�AMP Y.LI"iK7EWlCZ REILLY
DISCUSSION:_ —"—
ROLL CALL POPE:
'P'11 ORNBURGH
THORNBURGH
CO`"nSSrOIIcRs: AVE p ., S1A1N },BELT SENT
GOETCHEUS --- �— —
KLIZK1I;iICZ — - — ---
REILLY - — -- _ —
T!!0R^;BLRGH -- ---
UNi�.'Ili90L'SLY eDOt'TED: YL'S
NO
ITEM NO
DATE
PLANTING COi,MSSION MEETING
RE: ——
MOTION BY: tOETCHEUS TMK/I�P KLIMKIEIdICZ REILLY THORNBURCH
SECOND BY: GOETCHEUS i,LQI.Mp KLIMKIEWICZ REILLY TH�'B__UBS1I�
DISCUSSION:
ROLL CALL VOTE:
CO':NI SS IOSERS :
GOETTCHEUS
i L1i•ti:.-1 ildi.CZ
REILLY
T-KRNBURGH
U:2IUILI.fOU-SLY ',DOPi'ED:
,BSTAIN
NO
ABS;=1T PRESENT