Loading...
1990 03 13 PCPLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QUINTA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California March 13, 1990 - 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - Flag Salute ROLL CALL **NOTE** ALL AGENDA ITEMS NOT CONSIDERED BY 11:00 P.M. MAY BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING. Beginning Resolution No. 90-010 _ Minute Motion No. 90-006 HEARINGS 1. Item ................ TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 Applicant ........... LA QUINTA JOINT VENTURE Location ............ WITHIN THE LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN (A.K.A. SANTA ROSA COVE), ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENIDA FERNANDO, + 1/4-MILE WEST OF EISENHOWER DRIVE. Request ............. TO RE -SUBDIVIDE +26.81 ACRES WITHIN RECORDED TRACTS 14496-6 AND 14496-7, FROM 13 CONDOMINIUM LOTS AND 127 UNITS, TO 54 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS FOR DETACHED CUSTOM HOMES. Action .............. Resolution 90- 2. Item ................ PUBLIC HEARING FOR STREET NAME CHANGES Applicant ........... CITY OF LA QUINTA Request ............. CHANGE STREET NAMES FOR 50TH, 52ND, AND 54TH AVENUES Action .............. Minute Motion 90- BJ/AGENDA3.13 - 1 - NO PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Planning Commission on matters relating to City planning and zoning which are not Agenda items. Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission under Public Comment and scheduled Agenda items should use the form provided. Please complete one form for each item you intend to address and submit the form to the Planning Director prior to the beginning of the meeting. Your name will be called at the appropriate time. When addressing the Planning Commission, please state your name and address. The proceedings of the Planning Commission meeting are recorded on tape and comments of each person shall be limited. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting held February 27, 1990. BUSINESS SESSION 1. Item ............... Applicant ........... Request ............. Location ............ Action .............. 2. Item ............... Applicant ........... Request ............. Location ............ Action .............. 3. Item ................ Applicant ........... Action .............. TENTATIVE TRACT 25389 M. J. Brock & Sons Review of architectural 254 lot subdivision Generally located south Avenue and west of the Evacuation Channel Minute Motion 90- plans for of 50th La Quinta SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 Jamie L. Davidson for Washington Square Group Approval of one year time extension for a Specific Plan and Annual Review of Specific Plan East of Washington Street, and south of Highway 111. Resolution 90- ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION COMMITTEES RECOMMENDATION ON THE HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE City of La Quinta Referred from the City Council Minute Motion 90- BJ/AGENDA3.13 - 2 - (�� 4. Item ................ TEN FOOT GARDEN WALL ON WASHINGTON STREET Applicant ........... Larry Deason Request ............. Construction of a 10-foot block wall Location ............ 49-470 Avenida Montero Action .............. Minute Motion 90- OTHER - None ADJOURNMENT -------------------------------------------------- ITEMS FOR MARCH 12, 1990, 4:00 P.M. STUDY SESSION "DISCUSSION ONLY" 1. All Agenda items. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 89-009, Fencing Regulations. 3. Sagebrush retention basin. 4. Identification of future Commission Agenda items. ITEMS IDENTIFIED FOR FUTURE AGENDAS a. Downtown Parking District b. Height limits along Washington Street C. PGA West Specific Plan d. Commercial Noise Study e. Life safety support design, including access and circulation, public and private f. Discussion regarding forming committee to up -grade Cove BJ/AGENDA3.13 - 3 - 20, 003 STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: MARCH 13, 1990 SUBJECT: SAGEBRUSH RETENTION BASIN The issue of the retention basin at the end of Sagebrush has been resolved by the Engineering Department and the Mayor. Therefore, there is no need to bring this matter before you at this time. BJ/MEMOJH.051 - 1 - '_ (Itj t STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN & MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: MARCH 12, 1990 SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 89-009, FENCE REGULATIONS Attached are revised fencing regulations. Staff will review these regulations with you during the Study Session at 4:00 P.M. on Monday, March 12, 1990. Based upon this review, a Public Hearing will be scheduled. This matter was before the Commission last year. The Commission recommended changes as illustrated in Exhibit "A". The Council reviewed recommended changes and generated additional comments and changes. The matter was then tabled pending more review. Some of the concerns identified by the Council are: o Permit combination fencing o Vary setbacks with different fence heights o Eliminate wood construction o Permit wood construction o Permit split rail fencing o Establish standards for color and material for wood fencing o Reconstruction of damaged fencing Based upon these concerns, new draft fencing regulations are attached for your review. BJ/MEMOJH.050 - 1 - oU5 DRAFT FENCING REGULATIONS 9.42.070 - Fencing 1. General Requirements: Rear and side yards shall be completely enclosed and screened by view -obscuring fencing, walls, vegetation, planted screens, or combinations. 2. Height/Location: Fencing for rear and side yards shall be a minimum of 5-feet and a maximum of 6-feet in height. The fence may be located on the property line. Fencing in the front and street side yards shall be limited as follows: Setback Fence Height 0' - 10' setback - 4' high maximum 10.1' - 15' setback - 5' high maximum 15.1' - 20' setback - 6' high maximum (Note: height of swimming pool fencing in front yards is controlled State Code and is exempt from the above regulations. Corner setback regulations, per Chapter 9.204. Perimeter fencing around tracts maybe 6-feet in height and constructed on property line.) 3. Construction Material/Standards: All fencing shall conform with the following: a. Wood Fencing: all wood fencing shall be constructed of #1 Cedar or Redwood boards, stained or painted to match or complement the adjacent wall or structure. The wood may as an alternative be water treated and left in the natural color. The fence boards may be erected horizontal or vertical. Support posts shall be a minimum of 4" X 4" Cedar or Redwood placed 6-feet on center and imbedded in concrete. Split rail Cedar or Redwood is also acceptable. Wooden fencing maybe permitted in front, street sideyard, rear or sideyard. b. Ornamental Iron -Tubular Steel: Ornamental iron/tubular steel fencing may be used along the front or street side yards only. The iron/steel must be painted to compliment the adjacent wall or structure. BJ/DOCJH.031 - 1 - d. Combination: Combinations of the above material maybe used for the front or street sideyard provided that the bottom one-half must be constructed of a masonry material. Combinations of the masonry and wood materials may be used for the rear and sideyards only. e. Fences, walls and vegetation screens shall generally conform with the design standards and typical layouts contained within the Manual on Architectural Standards, unless modified above. f. Vegetation screens must consist of planting materials of a suitable type, size, spacing, so as to provide a view -obscuring barrier within a reasonable time of planting as set forth in the landscape plan approval, and shall be watered by an automatic irrigation system. The planting plan shall be approved by the Planning and Development Department. g. The area between the street right-of-way and any fencing must be landscaped, have a suitable irrigation system and be material be maintained by the property owner. BJ/DOCJH.031 - 2 - �'U7 City Council Ordinance No. 89- Case No. ZOA 89-009 Exhibit "A" Amend Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) Chapter 9.204 as follows: 9.204.050 Reconstruction. Notwithstanding any provision of Chapter 9.152 to the contrary, any fence, wall, hedge or landscaping which is destroyed or damaged to the extent of more than 50 percent of its total replacement value or removed in whole or part, may not be reconstructed, repaired, rebuilt or reestablished oi,,,; 1 A i na _ or unless the rewua_, u����•• - --- - reestablishinq is in conformance with the requirements and standards set forth by this Title. For purposes of this section, the portion thereof, which is in a corner cutback area, shall be considered separately from the rest of any fence, wall, hedge or landscaping to which it is or was attached. Amend Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) Section 9.42.070 as follows: F. Fencing 1. Rear and side yards shall be completely enclosed and- screened by - view -obscuring fencing, walls, vegetation -planted screens, or combination thereof, unless modified in Section 9.42.070 (F,2). 2. Fencing along the front property line, or in the front yard setback area, including the area behind the front setback in the interior side yard area, back to where side walls (between structure and interior side property lines) occur, or between any structure and side property line, or along the street side yard setback area, or between any structures and the rear exterior property line, shall be constructed of a masonry product such as block, rock, brick, stucco, etc., and/or ornamental iron/tubular steel. Any gates in these walls shall be constructed of ornamental iron/tubular steel, and/or minimum 4" wide cedar or redwood boards and stained or painted in a color to match or complement the adjacent wall or structure. BJ/ORDDRFT.05A - 1 - I- OU 4 3. Fences, walls, and vegetation screens shall generally conform with the design standards and typical layouts contained within the Manual on Architectural Standards, unless modified in Section 9.42.070 (F,2). 4. Vegetation screens must consist of planting materials of a suitable type, size, and spacing, so as to provide a view -obscuring barrier within a reasonable time of planting as set forth in the landscape plan approval, and shall be watered by an automatic irrigation system. The planting plan shall be approved by the Planning and Development Department. 5. All walls and fences shall be continuously maintained in good repair, and vegetation screens shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and viable condition. BJ/ORDDRFT. 05A - 2 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF LA QUINTA A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California February 27, 1990 I. II. III 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER A. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Walling. The Flag Salute was led by Commissioner Zelles. ROLL CALL A. Chairman Walling requested the roll call. Present: Commissioners Zelles, Moran, Bund, Steding and Chairman Walling. B. Staff Present: Planning and Development Director Jerry Herman, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Department Secretary Betty Anthony. HEARINGS Chairman Walling introduced the Public Hearing items as follows: A. CONTINUED HEARING: Specific Plan 89-014 and Plot Plan 90-434. A request of Transpacific Development Company to approve a commercial shopping center with approximately 617,595 + of floor area on 60 + acres and approval of a Plot Plan to allow construction of Phases I and III of the project (five major stores and retail shops in the C-P-S Zone). 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the Staff Report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. BJ/MIN2/27.DFT - 1 - N_1 r) 2. Chairman Walling opened the public hearing. Mr. Peter Adams, President Transpacific Development Company spoke to thank the Commission and Staff for their cooperation in helping to develop this project. He questioned Condition #44 and asked that it be deleted. Mr. Rick Manners, MCG Architects for the project described the changes that were made since the last meeting. 3. Chairman Walling closed the Public Hearing. 4. Following discussion among the Commission, Staff and the Developer regarding landscaping, signs, and street accesses, Conditions of Approval 44, 26, 27F, 55C, and 67, were revised. 5. There being no further discussion Commissioner Zelles moved and Commissioner Bund seconded the motion to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 90-008 recommending approval of Specific Plan 89-014 to the City Council subject to the revised conditions. Unanimously approved on a roll call vote. 6. It was moved by Commissioner Zelles and seconded by Commissioner Bund to approve Plot Plan 90-434 by minute motion 90-004. Unanimously approved. B. Amending the Zoning Ordinance to drop zones which the City no longer uses. A City initiated request to eliminate certain zoning ordinance which have not been used in the past and will probably not be used in the future. Planning Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the Staff Report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. 2. Chairman Walling opened the Public Hearing. Audrey Ostrowski addressed the Commission regarding not eliminating Industrial Zoning from the City. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Walling closed the Public Hearing. BJ/MIN2/27.DFT - 2 - 3. There being no further discussion, Commissioner Moran moved and Commissioner Steding seconded the motion to approve Planning Commission Resolution 90-009 recommending to the City Council approval of amending the Zoning Ordinance to drop certain zones. On a roll call vote unanimously adopted. IV. PUBLIC COMMENT Kate Kelly 78-565 Sagebrush Avenue, Robert Nagels 78-530 Bottlebrush Drive, A. J. Marago 78-540 Bottlebrush Drive, Helen Nelson 78-707 Saguaro Road, addresses the Commission regarding the drainage retention area at the end of Bottlebrush Drive. Chairman Walling asked Senior Engineer Steve Speer if he could enlighten the Commission in regard to the construction of the drainage retention area. After further discussion, the Commission requested the Planning Director to determine if this matter was within the bounds of the Commission's jurisdiction, or just what could be done to address the concerns of this neighborhood. V. BUSINESS SESSION VI A. Tentative Tract 23269; a request of Triad Pacific Development Corporation for approval of proposed architectural elevations for a fifth unit. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the Staff Report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. 2. Following discussion regarding the improvement of the design, Commissioner Moran moved and Commissioner Steding seconded the motion to approve the architectural elevation by minute motion 90-005. Unanimously approved. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Commissioner Steding and seconded by Commissioner Moran to adjourn to a regular meeting on March 13, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. in the La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. This meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:05 P.M., February 27, 1990. BJ/MIN2/27.DFT - 3 - ));2 BI-3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND• MEMORANDUM HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MARCH 13, 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION COMMITTEES RECOMMENDATION ON THE HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE The Environmental Conservation Committee presented recommendations to the City Council on January 16, 1990, regarding the Hillside Conservation Zone. The City Council directed that the Committees recommendation be agendized before the Planning Commission within 60-days for consideration and that the City Attorney review the recommendation to see how "they meld with current law". The City Attorney is preparing an opinion and if not attached will be distributed prior to the meeting. Members of the Committee will make a presentation on March 13, 1990. Therefore the matter is before the Commissioners for review and recommendation to the City Council. Attachments: 1. Council minutes 2. Committee's report 3. Hillside Ordinance BJ/MEMOJH.053 - 1 - .. 0 - City Council Minutes Page 3 January 16, 1990 It was moved by Council Members Bohnenberger/Rushworth that Resolution No. 90-8 be adopted and concurring with the environmental determination. Motion carried unanimously. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. Letter from City of Indio to Desert Sands School District regarding the naming of a new school. Noted and filed. b. Letter from La Quinta Arts Foundation supporting the renaming of a street to "Andy Williams Drive". Noted and filed. BUSINESS SESSION 1. PRESENTATION OF REPORT BY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION COMMITTEE REGARDING HILLSIDE CONSERVATION. Fred Wolff, Chairman of the Environmental Conservation Committee addressed the Council and introduced members Katie Barrows, Sharon Kennedy, and Maureen Mendoza and advised that Howard Nelson was ill and unable to attend. He then proceeded to review the past history of this issue advising that the Council adopted an ordinance regulating hillside development in October. Some of the citizens did not believe that ordinance to be strong enough, thus the committee was formed. He also related the national concern over the environment and the residents of our community are equally concerned about preservation of our wilderness areas and hillsides. He commented that La Quinta is the only City in the Valley still left with virgin wilderness and hillsides. Mr. Wolff presented exhibits showing that over 50% of the hillsides are in private ownership with 8 or 10 owners. He also pointed out there area areas where a person with 200 acres can put in a golf course with 20 homes. The Committee concluded that there is only one solution to protecting our hillsides and that is to find some way to turn the current, privately -held parcels into public ownership. That has to be accomplished without any loss of value to the current owners. They strongly recommended that the City make that its' goal - that all property in the hillsides shall eventually be publicly owned and nothing shall be developed there. The most effective way to proceed is to draw on a variety of agencies that have programs for exchanging areas that are to be preserved for land that they own, that can be developed. City Council Minutes Page 4 January 16, 1990 KATIE BARROWS addressed the Council on various ways in which the hillsides can be protected, such as: designation as a National Scenic Area; or designation as a Big Horn Sheep Preserve; establishment of a Santa Rosa Mts. Conservancy; or establishment of a private, non-profit trust. She felt that the Committee would be willing to assist the City in further exploring these options. FRED WOLFF stated that the recommendation of the Committee is that the City not to approve or accept any developments in the open space areas for a one year period, which could be a testing time; developmental period and initial implementation period. At one year, the City would work with the owners of the parcels and the agencies discussed to see how much land can be converted. They also ask for a response from the Council within 60 days. He felt that there is an opportunity here for the City to be a model for the nation insofar as how to protect lands that have not yet been developed. The City Council proceeded to express their wholehearted support for seeking ways in which to strengthen our ordinance and to preserve the hillsides. They also commended the Committee on an excellent job. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bohnenberger that the Environmental Conservation Committee's recommendations be agendized to the Planning Commission within the next 60-days for consideration and that the City Attorney review the recommendations to see how they meld with current law. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 90-11. 2. PRESENTATION OF REPORT BY MRS. MENDOZA REGARDING RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD. Mrs. Mendoza, the City's representative on the Riverside County Library Advisory Board advised that an Annual Report has been completed which she will provide to the City. She related various statistics which show that the library is being well used. She commended the City Council for indicating their intent to apply for library construction funds for a new facility. 3. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR CIVIC CENTER DESIGN SERVICES. Mr. Reynolds presented the Council with the proposed contract with Gruen Associates for Civic Design Services. He advised that the work will be contracted on a "phase basis", with the first phase contract being for basic architectural and engineering services at a cost $134,400. The total Phase I construction cost at this point (without having done further schematic design) is $6.6 million - this is for administration; council chambers; site finish; site temporary; furniture, fixtures and equipment and a contingency. FRED WOLFF P.O. Box 1016 La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 564-4070 January 10, 1990 Mr. Ron L. Kiedrowski, City Manager City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, Ca 92253 Dear Ron: I have the pleasure of notifying you that the Environmental Conservation Committee has completed its task of developing recommendations to the City Council regarding hillside development. We met the three months timeline as set by the Council. In a few days, I will provide xou with our report and recommendations. We would appreciate being able to make a presentation at the City Council meeting on February 6th. Since there is much public and media interest regarding this issue, it would be helpful if our report could be placed early on the agenda. It is important that we explain to the Council how we arrived at our recommendations, and why a change from the adopted ordinance is necessary. I estimate a 15-20 minutes presentation. The Committee most sincerely appreciates the assistance we have received from City Hall. Most particularly, Jerry Herman has been most helpful in providing needed information, developing requested materials. and attending some meetings. Without his help, our task would have been far more complex. i.de hope that our recommendations will meet a favorable response from the City Council, and that the City as a whole will benefit from their, implementation. Regards, Fred Wolff, Chairman, I.C.C. cc.: Saundra Juhola, City Clerk I.C.C. Members ENVIRONMENTAL_ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE C I TY OF LA Q U I NTA A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING "AN OPEN SPACE POLICY FOR LA QUINTA" January, 1990 The Environmental Conservation Committee strongly commends the City Council for its unanimous commitment to the preservation of La Quinta's open space areas, as demonstrated by passing the strongest hillside protection ordinance in the Coachella Valley, and subsequently creating this Committee to explore further means of protecting the mountainous areas from development. These actions are in direct response to the following General Plan statement: "La Quinta's natural setting has mandated a major land use commitment to open space. Over 40 percent of the city's area consists of steep hillsides plus several water courses and other essential flood control facilities. This land must be kept in primary undeveloped condition due to its topographical characteristics, access constrains, lack of infrastructure and similar inherent limitations." Adopted by the La Quinta City Council: Resolution It 85-97, November 19, 1985 1. The Committee, based on its research, unfortunately finds that Chapter 9.145 of the La Quinta Municipal Code does NOT adequately protect the open space/hillside areas in La Quinta from development. 2. The Committee also finds that the only conditions which would protect open space/hillside areas in La Quinta from development in perpetuity is the transfer of all currently privately -owned parcels in the open space area to public ownership, at no loss of value to the private owners. Let that be the long-range goal of the City of La Quinta. - 3. The Committee consequently recommends the following program: 3.1. The City Council shall declare a ONE YEAR moratorium on all development, public or private, in the areas designated "open space" in the City's General Plan. 3.2. During the year, the City shall make every effort to implement a program of exchange of private property within the open space area to publicly owned parcels of equal value and outside the open space area, with such agencies as B.L.M., the U.S. Forestry Service, etc. who provide for such a program. 3.3. Owners of property in the open space area shall also have the following options: 3.3.1. Maintain ownership of the property in its present state. 3.3.2. Donate or sell the property to a public or private entity which will preserve it to perpetuity. 3.3.3. Exercise their "Transfer of Development Rights", as defined in Chaper 9.146 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. However, this option requires transfer of development rights outside the open space areas. 3.4. Projects already approved for development in the open space area are exempt from this program, unless the owners participate voluntarily. 3.5. The City Council shall assess the success of the program at the end of the year. If needed, the Committee shall be called upon to make additional recommendations to the City Council for meeting the goal of the program. 3.6. Owners of parcels in the open space area who were not able to participate in the program during the year shall be assured that subsequent actions by the City shall protect the value of their investments. 3.7. In cases of emergencies, temporary access facilities may be necessary in the open spaces areas, but only based a unanimous vote of the City Council of La Quinta. 4. The Committee recommends the following uses for the publically owned open space areas: 4.1. Hiking trails and other nature -related facilities which will not scar the natural terrain in areas above 10% slopes. 4.2. In areas already scarred, passive recreational facilities can be provided. However, no structures shall be constructed for these purposes above 30% slope areas. Any recreational buildings shall be on the periphery of the open space area, and not visable from the rest of the community. I;13 City Council Minutes Page 2 September 19, 1989 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 89-008 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 89-043 - AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 9.145 HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE AND REZONE THOSE PROPERTIES WHICH MEET ITS CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE ORDINANCE TO HILLSIDE CONSERVATION FROM VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND CONFIRMATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. Mr. Bower, Principal Planner, advised that the Council has been presented with the resolution accepting the negative declaration for CEQA purposes and an ordinance which has three parts 1) adopts hillside conservation zoning ordinance amendment; 2) adopts the transfer of development rights; and 3) changes the zones from various zones to Hillside Conservation for all the land that is in the open space designation in the General Plan. He noted that three letters have been received - one in favor of the proposal and two against. The Mayor declared the public hearing OPEN. FRED WOLFF, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, commented on the importance of this decision and that it is probably the most important one the Councilmen will make while on the Council. Hillside development restrictions are generally controversial, mostly with developers - not the people. He believed that the mountains are the biggest asset of La Quinta. He felt that the proposed ordinance takes a step, but is highly inadequate as he believed that it still opens some doors for development. Unless it is tightened up, he may go to the people to start an initiative process to restrict any development in the mountains. The people are probably willing to pay some law suits rather than see any development in the mountains. JACK BECKER, 1607 Agusta Plaza Drive, Palm Springs, advised that he is one of the owners of the south half of Section 29, which is in the cove, over -looking La Quinta. In response to Mr. Wolff's comments about the people wishing to see no development in the mountains, he believed that if any of them owned 312 acres, they would feel differently. He has owned this property for many years and he has partners and business interests who are interested in this property and they have aspirations of building a quality mountainside hotel on it. He felt that there should be a clause in the ordinance allowing the Council the ability to consider something if it was feasible and would in no way take away from the natural beauty of the mountains, but rather enhance them. He added that there is no better revenue to a City than hotel room occupancy. KATIE BARROWS, 53-277 Avenida Diaz, stated that after hearing both sides, she felt that we have an opportunity here.. She has heard many people say that what drew them to the City of La Quinta was our hillsides. Those mountains deserve to be left protected. She felt that the ordinance is a good compromise - it could be better, but we do have to respect the rights of the individual property owners. The City has done what they can doi,� City Council Minutes Page 3 September 19, 1W- in terms of opportunity for transfer of development rights. With regards to a quality hotel like a Ritz Carlton - that may be a quality, fabulous hotel, but by the same token, there are some people who feel that that kind of development doesn't belong in La Quinta. We have the opportunity to have La Quinta stand out as an area where hillsides are protected and we have quality hotels that are more low profile. She felt that the proposed ordinance could be strengthened, but encouraged the Council to adopt it and continue to work toward strengthening it. JIM SCHLECHT, Attorney, representing Bernard Debonne, advised that they believe that the ordinance is deficient. The City of course, has the right to decide this kind of policy decision as long as it's prepared to pay the cost of taking away private property. It isn't a matter of a few law suits, there's the fact that maybe equity demands that if the City, as a policy matter, feels that these hillsides should be pristine clear, then there should be some reasonable method of compensating the property owner. The transfer of development rights is a good idea, but did not know how we are going to be fair with the private property owners. He felt that the ordinance needs additional concern expressed in it in terms of adequately compensating the property owners in these transfer rights. The Mayor declared the public hearing CLOSED. Council Member Sniff referred to B(4) of the "Purpose and Intent" and asked if it's realistic and Mr. Bower responded that it is, in noting that the section dealing with grading and scrubbing and grubbing control, require that the City approve every attempt at grading or scarring or any cuts and fills so that only when approved, would a developer be allowed to disturb the existing hillside. As far as B(5), to some extent, that is a judgment call on the part of the Engineer. with regard to B(6), Council Member Sniff felt that to be a contradiction. Mr. Bower felt that it's difficult to make it any stronger without going over the edge and taking development rights away from the private property owners. The transfer of development rights system is set up at twice the densities that have been granted by County zoning and by City zoning. We are enriching the private property owner to the tune of twice the existing zoning and that should be sufficient, coupled with the ability to transfer those development rights from the hillsides exceeding 20% down to the alluvial fans that are less than 20%. The Debonne property was and still is zoned W-2-20 and it has some portions that are below 20% that could be developed and the property rights could be transferred down to that point. So he believed it is as good as we can do in balancing private and public ownership interests. 4.3. Generally, every attempt shall be made to maintain open space areas in a natural state with minimal disturbance to terrain, flora or fauna. 5. The Committee is prepared to assist the City with the implementation of this program during the year, as well as subsequently. 6. The Committee respectfully requests that the City Council act on these recommendations within sixty days after the submission of the above program. Respectfully submitted by the Environmental Conservation Committee: Katie Barrows, Sharon Kennedy, Maureen Mendoza, Howard Nelson and Fred Wolff (Chairman) City Council Minutes Page 4 September 19, 1989 Mayor Pena agreed with Katie Barrows in that we need to get something in place and then tightened up the areas that can be tightened up. He believed that the Council's intent is to make it as strict as possible without putting the City in jeopardy, both legally and financially. He agreed with Mr. Wolff, that the mountains are the City's primary asset, and he in no way wishes to see hillside development. Council Member Bosworth agreed that this is the most important issue that has come before her since she's been on the Council and felt that the hillsides should be preserved and remain as they are, whatever it takes. She wished to see La Quinta set a precedent for the Valley. Council Member Bohnenberger agreed that we should get something on the books and he felt that this is a good compromise. As far as being precedent setting, we are. He knew of no other City or County that has anything as strict as this ordinance. What we have here is a legally defensible document that allows us to do what we intended to do and that is to protect the viewscapes without unduly damaging the private owners that own the hillsides. He hoped to see the Hillside Conservation Bill get adopted and put into effect and that they can come up with some viable means of financing it so that we can place in the public trust, the visible portions of the hillsides in our valley and preserve them for the future. He saw this ordinance as a Positive step towards preventing any scarring of our hillsides. Council Member Rushworth agreed that we should get something on the books. We still have the ability to restrict anything from being developed that the Planning Commission and Council feels doesn't fit with what we envision for the City. He felt that it has merit and wished to see it passed. Council Member Sniff believed that as the ordinance is written, it's less than perfect and will not protect the foothills from building and is a blueprint for disaster. He felt that it should, 1) permit building on all the alluvial fans as long as adequate flood protection is provided and; 2) prohibit all building or construction on the rocky slopes, as they are seismically unstable, subject to severe flooding problems and rockslides; and 3) provide a generous, mandatory, transfer of development rights to any property owner of rocky hillside property. He felt that the City should move to annex the foothills generally to the west at least to the ridgeline, if it's possible, as they are considered to be a part of La Quinta visually, and for a hillside conservation ordinance to have meaning, it must include them. Mr. Kiedrowski advised that when he was at LAFCO, he looked at a map and all of the cities extend partially into the hills. There is a band 1 1/2 miles wide that goes from above La Quinta Hotel down to our southerly City Limit, which is Avenue 60, that is in no city's jurisdiction. LAFCO didn't know how they would handle annexation of that area, because the new rules for annexing land says that there must be some development potential to a City. OV-1 -4 City Council Minutes Page 5 September 19, 1989 RESOLUTION NO. 89-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-122 FOR THE HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ORDINANCE ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT AND THE CHANGE OF ZONE TO HILLSIDE CONSERVATION (H.C.), AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-135 FOR THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT. It was moved by Council Members Bohnenberger/Rushworth that Resolution No. 89-106 be adopted. FURTHER DISCUSSION Mayor Pena asked the City Attorney if this issue has been addressed by the Courts and she advised that there have been a few cases regarding transfer of development rights looked at and generally upheld the cities ability to utilize the concept of transfer of development rights to a point where you do not end up finding a taking. She believed that the proposed ordinance, in providing the one unit per 10 acre and the ability to transfer the development rights, plus the ability to build where the slopes are not exceeding the 20%, still offers the land owners quite a bit of value in their holdings. Mayor Pena asked if "D" under "Permitted Uses" were stricken, would it alter the effect of the ordinance and she did not believe so, but was concerned about striking it, because you will still have people hiking and riding and the City will have lost their ability to control it in any way, to the extent that there may be some safety concerns. Mayor Pena questioned the regulatory effect on coloring and Mr. Bower advised that coloring is not provided because you cannot develop the mountains except on the alluvial fans and those are no different from the SR Zone we now have in the Cove. He noted, however, that all projects would have to go through design review process in which coloring is considered. Council Member Sniff asked, for clarification, if this ordinance, in anyway permits building on the rocky hillsides and Mr. Bower stated only if it was below the 20% slope and added that building on those rocky hillsides is self-defeating as it isn't safe and is too close to the rock slide potential in a seismic event. Mr. Kiedrowski advised that he tried to find some rocky hillsides under 20% and couldn't find any, but couldn't guarantee there aren't any. MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Rushworth, Mayor Pena NOES: Council Members Bosworth, Sniff ABSTAIN: None (12 3 ABSENT: None City Council Minutes Page 6 September 19, 1989 MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Bohnenberger/Rushworth that Ordinance No. 147 be taken up by title and number only and that full reading be waived. Motion carried with Council Members Bosworth and Sniff voting NO. ORDINANCE NO. 147 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TWO CHAPTERS: 9.145 HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE, AND 9.146 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, AND BY ADOPTING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM VARIOUS ZONES TO H.C. (HILLSIDE CONSERVATION) FOR ALL LAND PRESENTLY DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE IN THE GENERAL PLAN. It was moved by Council Members Bohnenberger/Rushworth that Ordinance No. 147 be introduced. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Rushworth, Mayor Pena NOES: Council Members Bosworth, Sniff ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. Letter from Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta regarding a location for their facility. MARK SIMON, 45-405 Driftwood Dr. Palm Desert, representing the Boys and Girls Club, addressed the Council advising that the Board Members of the Club is trying to provide a safe environment for our 1,200 children. He advised that the organization has raised $106,000 to date in two separate events and they hope to be self-sufficient with their many planned fund-raisers. They are hoping to find a rental site within the next few weeks and hope to begin programming within the next 8 weeks. He is before the Council looking for assistance in providing a clubhouse. Other cities in the Valley provide a dollar a year lease back on a piece of land. He suggested perhaps the 2 1/2 acres that was earmarked for the Elvirita Lewis Foundation; or the Fritz Burns Park. If that isn't possible, then they are looking for operating costs, possibly a portion of the developers money that was earmarked for parks and recreation. Mayor Pena advised that the Council will schedule this matter for discussion at a future meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 147 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TWO CHAPTERS: 9.145 HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE, AND 9.146 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, AND BY ADOPTING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM VARIOUS ZONES TO H.C. (HILLSIDE CONSERVATION) FOR ALL LAND PRESENTLY DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE IN THE GENERAL PLAN. The City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Title 9 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding two chapters: 9.145 Hillside Conservation and 9.146 Transfer of Development Rights, attached hereto as ZOA No. 89-008 and ZOA No. 89-010. SECTION 2. All land designated in the General Plan as Open Space is hereby rezoned from various zones to Hillside Conservation as depicted in the General Plan and on the map attached hereto as CZ No. 89-043. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least the three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and it's certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered in the Book of ordinances of this City. The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of October 1989, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: NONE ABSENT: Council Member Bosworth ABSTAIN: NONE JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California n , BJ/ORDDRFT.007 - 1 - ATTEST: AUNDRA �JUHOLA,.' ty Clerk City of La Quinta APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: DAWN HONEYWELL, Ci Attorney RON KIEDROWSKI, City Manager City of La Quinta City of La Quinta n2 BJ/ORDDRFT.007 - 2 _ CHAPTER 9.145 H.C. ZONE (HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE) Sections• 9.145.005 .010 .015 .020 .025 .030 .035 .040 .045 .050 .055 .060 .065 .070 .075 Generally Purpose and Intent Application to Property Permitted Uses Plot Plan Review Required Design Review Required Engineering Reviews Required Other Studies Required Grading, Grubbing, Scarring Control Development Standards Division of HC Zoned Land Transfer of Development Rights Alteration of the Location of the Toe of the Slope Recreation/Open Space Ownership and Maintenance Change of Designation 9.145.005 GENERALLY. A. The Hillside Conservation within the City of La Plan as "Open Space". (H.C.) Zone applies to all land Quinta designated in the General B. The Hillside Conservation specifically to land meeting above "the toe of the slope", "Application to Property", sections (San Bernardino Base City of La Quinta: (H.C.) Ordinance applies the definitions of being as defined in 9.145.015 within the following 19 and Meridian) within the TSS, R7E: Sections 19, TSS, R6E: Section 36; T6S, R6E: Sections 1, T6S, R7E: Sections 6, 28, 29, 30. 25, 30; 12, 13, 24, 25; 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, C. The H.C. Ordinance shall also apply to each and every parcel of land within the city (without otherwise being noted on exhibit or map which is added to the City by annexation, dedication, or other means) meeting the definitions of being above "the toe of the slope". BJ/ORDDRFT.003 D. Except as specifically provided elsewhere in this title, \ any and all disturbance of natural terrain, grubbing, grading, new use, and every new building and premises or land in the H.C. zone shall be used for or occupied and every building shall be erected, constructed, established, altered, enlarged, maintained, moved into or within such H.C. Zone exclusively and only in accordance with regulations set forth in this chapter. 9.145.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT. A. The purpose of this Chapter is twofold: 1) to define those hillside areas which are not developable, from either a public safety or engineering perspective, and to prevent inappropriate development on them; and 2) for those hillside areas which are developable, to ensure the safety of the public, and to ensure that the placement, density, and type of all hillside development within the City of La Quinta is suitable to the topography of the existing terrain, that proposed developments will provide for minimal disturbance of the existing terrain and natural habitat, and that the natural hillside characteristics will be retained wherever practicable. B. It is the further purpose of this Chapter to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan and to achieve the following objectives: 1. To protect the public from hazards associated with hillside development, including seismic activity, I andslides, flooding, inaccessibility from fire and emergency services, lack of water for fire control, wild fires, collapse of roads, and similar risks. 2. To protect and conserve hillside ecosystems through the retention of unique natural topographic features and hillsde characteristics, including drainage patterns, -reams, slopes, ridgelines, rock outcroppings, _stas, natural vegetation, and the habitats and migratory routes of animals; 3. To maximize the retention of the City's natural topographic features, including, but not limited to, mountainsides, mountain faces, skyline profiles, ridgelines, ridgecrests, hilltops, hillsides, slopes, arroyos, ravines, canyons, prominent vegetation, rock outcrops, view corridors, and scenic vistas, through the careful limitation and selection of building sites and building pads on said topographic features, thereby enhancing the beauty of the City's landscape. BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 2 - 02 s, 4. To assure that developmental use of said topographic features will relate to the surrounding topography and will not be conspicuous and obtrusive because of the design and location of said developmental use; 5. To reduce the scarring effects of excessive grading for roads, building pads, and cut and fill slopes. 6. To balance public and private interests while preserving the hillsides. 9.145.015 APPLICATION TO PROPERTY. A. In the La Quinta General Plan, all hillsides and some alluvial fans are designated "open space". In general, ' the dividing line between open space and other land uses is meant to follow and be bounded by "the toe of the slope. The area above "the toe of the slope" includes not only hillsides, but also alluvial fans which are not protected by flood control structures, and drainage ways and stream courses which have some potential for flooding. In general, alluvial fans not exceeding 20% slope are developable consistent with this chapter either through the transfer of residential units from contiguous hillside areas, by change of designation (9.145.075) by providing flood protection (9.145.065). B. For any parcel subject to the jurisdiction of the City of La Quinta, the City Engineer, upon viewing the site and considering a land suitability study (containing all the requirements in .035) submitted by the applicant shall determine the boundary between the developable and the undevelopable portions of the parcel by locating "the toe of the slope", using the following criteria (more than one criterion may apply): 1. The point where water -borne alluvial material not exceeding 20% slope begins to collect to a depth of one foot or more; 2. The dividing line between steeper rock formations and more gently sloping alluvium, i.e., where there is a noticeable break in the angle of slope from steep to shallow; 3. where the angle of slope exceeds 20%; 4. An area unprotected from flooding potential, i.e., an area above the uppermost flood control structure which intercepts runoff (in the form of either natural water courses or as overland sheet flow) and directs it to a controlled stormwater diversion channel (see Section .065). BJ/ORDDRFT. 003 - 3ti - 9.145.020 PERMITTED USES. A. No development (except as provided under Subsection D, below) shall be approved for slopes exceeding 20%. B. The following are exempt from the requirements of this Chapter: tracts and specific plans already approved. C. The following uses within the HC Zone shall be permitted on alluvial fans with slopes not exceeding 20%: a.) Golf courses (not including above -ground structures), but permitting fairways, greens, tees, and golf -cart paths to access them; b.) Flood -control structures; c.) Parks, lakes, and passive recreation facilities; d.) water wells, pumping stations, and water tanks (if properly screened or painted); e.) Power, telephone, and cable substations and transmission lines (if properly screened or painted); f.) T.V., cable, and radio antennas; g.) Hiking and equestrian trails; h.) Single family residential uses; i.) Accessory uses necessary to accomplish the permitted uses such as roads, gate -houses, on -site subdivision signs, parking lots, noncommercial community association, recreation, and assembly buildings and facilities. D. The following uses within the HC Zone shall be permitted on slopes exceeding 20%: a.) Hiking and equestrian trails not permitting vehicles; b.) Access roads which shall be non -visible unless applicant can prove to the City that the only access to a non -visible area must traverse a visible area. (Ownership or non -ownership of property is not sufficient proof of reason to place a road in a visible area.) Roads cannot exceed 15% grade. 9.145.025 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW REQUIRED All development within the H.C. Zone shall file and receive approval (or modification) of plans by means of the Conditional Use Permit approval processes described in Chapter 9.172 plus all requirements of this chapter. )30 BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 4 - 9.145.030 DESIGN REVIEW. All development in the HC Zone shall be subject to Design Review pursuant to Chapter 9.183 Design Review. "Development" in this context shall include the following: grading, building, grubbing, or permitting any heavy equipment (equipment whose function is digging,clearing, earth -moving, grading, or a similar function disruptive to the natural terrain) access to the H.C. Zone property. 9.145.035 ENGINEERING REVIEWS REQUIRED. For every home site or for every subdivision proposed within the H.C. Zone, the following reports shall be prepared by a California -licensed engineer (licensed in the appropriate discipline), and filed with the City Engineer (unless specifically waived by the City Engineer based on a site visit to the proposed site): a.) Hydrology, drainage, and flooding report for all sites; b.) Soil survey of the sites proposed attesting to stability of all sites, and the appropriateness of the construction method proposed; c.) Underlying geology/engineering report, attesting to stability of all sites; d.) Seismic analysis attesting to the stability of the site(s) and addressing the potential of- material above the site(s) impacting the site(s); e.) Access plan showing the preliminary engineering for roads giving access to the proposed site(s); f.) Grading plan for the construction site(s) and access routes. g.) A utility plan demonstrating the feasibility of providing water for domestic and fire suppression purposes, sewer, power, and other utilities, especially with regard to the scarring effects of the grading necessary to install such utilities. The City Engineer shall specifically approve each proposed site and access route based on the submitted reports. 9.145.040 OTHER STUDIES REQUIRED. The following studies shall be filed with the Planning and Development Department as a part of the application process: A. All development in the HC Zone shall be subject to a review by a qualified biologist, which addresses the following: Natural vegetation and native affected by the project; plants which may be BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 5 - 2. wildlife habitats, migratory routes (e.g., for Bighorn sheep), and native animal species; 3. Plan to maintain corridors for wildlife habitat and movement of animals within H.C. Zone. B. All development in the H.C. Zone shall be subject to a review by a qualified archaeologist, which addresses the following: 1. A thorough examination of the site for archaeological remains; 2. A plan for the salvage of any significant findings; 3. A review of the site for any significant historic or cultural resources. C. A plan for the preservation of all areas exceeding slopes above 10% (as per Section 9.145.045 J.), including: 1. The designation of all areas exceeding 10% slope, with the degree of slope noted, and the calculation of the percent to be left undisturbed; 2. The designation of all water courses both natural and man-made, with plans for the preservation and/or reintroduction of drought tolerant plants. Water courses shall be designated as Open Space; 3. A monitoring program (following CEQA) for the preservation of open spaces. 9.145.045 GRADING GRUBBING AND SCARRING CONTROL. A. No permits shall be issued for any grading, grubbing, building or structure in the H.C. Zone until grading plans, slope planting and irrigation plans, and building elevations for design review have been submitted to the Planning Commission for recommendation and to the City Council for approval. In reviewing plans for grading, slope planting and irrigation, native revegetation, mitigation of scarring caused by grubbing and grading, preservation of the natural state of the hillsides and water courses (based on slope angle) and building elevations, the Commission and Council shall consider the purpose and intent of this chapter and the criteria established in Section 9.145.050, together with applicable standards and shall approve the design if all applicable provisions are met. 032 BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 6 - B. Conditions may be applied when the proposed development does not comply with applicable standards and shall be such as to bring such development into conformity or the plans and drawings may be disapproved and the City shall specify the standard or standards that are not met. C. The Applicant or Developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of all slope planting and irrigation systems until such time as the properties are occupied or until a homeowner's association accepts the responsibility to maintain the landscaping in common areas, or other maintenance district formation is established. D. Any person who fails to protect the natural terrain, defaces, grades, grubs, scars, or otherwise disrupts the natural terrain in the H.C. Zone without prior City approval of plans for such work, subject to this Chapter, shall have created a public nuisance which shall be abated. Abatement may include the property owner undertaking the restoration (under City supervision and monitoring), or that failing, City -contracted restoration of the disrupted area. The property owner may be charged the cost of the restoration together with the direct costs of supervision and monitoring of the restoration. If the property owner fails to reimburse the City the costs incurred, a lien against the property for payment may be instituted and collected. E. -Any plans which are being considered by the City for possible approval of development shall at the time of discovery of the creation of the public nuisance be denied by the considering body. After such time as the public nuisance has been completely abated, the plans may be resubmitted, upon payment of all required fees. F. The provisions of this section shall be in addition to other Municipal Code titles and regulations applicable to grading activities within the City. No grading shall be conducted, nor shall any grading permit be issued for any grading in the H.C. Zone until grading plans and special drawings showing grading and topography as viewed from critical locations within the neighborhood or community have been submitted to the Planning Commission for recommendation and to the City Council for approval. G. The Commission and Council shall consider the following matters of particular concern in their review of grading proposals in the H.C. Zone. Conditions may be attached to the approval of grading plans so as to achieve the purpose and intent of this chapter and the following objectives: 1. The health and safety of the public; (JJ BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 7 - 2. The preservation of vegetation and animal habitat, designation of stream courses as open space, preservation of habitat corridors, encouraging revegetation with drought -tolerant native species; 3. The avoidance of terracing and cut scarring effects of 4. The encouragement optimum treatment features; and, excessive building padding or and fill slopes to reduce the grading; of sensitive grading to ensure of natural hillside and arroyo 5. The encouragement of imaginative grading plans to soften the impact of grading on hillsides, including rolled, sloping, or split pads, rounded cut and fill slopes, and post and beam construction techniques; 6. The maximum retention of vistas, and natural topographic features including mountainsides, ridgelines, hilltops, slopes, rock outcroppings, arroyos, ravines, and canyons. H. All land areas with 20% or greater slope shall not be graded in any manner except at the specific discretion of the City Council, and only where it can be shown that a minimum amount of development is in the spirit of, and not incompatible with, the purposes and policies set forth in this article. I. The following table indicates those minimum percentages of the ground surface of a site which shall remain in a natural state (no cut or fill or grubbing) or be developed solely for recreational purposes based on the average percent slope of a parcel: 0,i� BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 8 - TABLE OF NATURAL SITE TO BE PRESERVED MINIMUM PERCENT OF SITE TO REMAIN IN NATURAL STATE (NO CUT OR FILL AVERAGE PERCENT SLOPE OR GRUBBING) OR BE DEVELOPED OF SITE SOLELY FOR RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE PURPOSES 10.0 - 12.4 70.0 12.5 - 14.9 77.5 15.0 - 17.4 85.0 17.5 - 19.9 92.5 20.00 or more 100.0 "Average Percent Slope" means the average natural inclination of the ground surface of a lot or parcel expressed as a percent and as measured by the following formula: S = 0.002296xIxL A Where: S = Average Natural Slope in Percent I = Natural Contour Interval in Feet L = Length of Natural Contour in Feet A = Acres of Property (Parcel of Record Existing on November 13, 1979) 0.002296 = Constant which Converts Square Feet into Acres and Expresses Slope in Percent 9.145.050 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. A. Maximum density and minimum lot permitted. In the H.C. Zone the maximum density permitted shall be one residential unit per 10 acres. On a contiguous parcel which includes areas both above and below the "toe of the slope", residential units may be clustered together below the "toe of the slope" to take advantage of buildable areas with lower slope angles, provided the overall density for the parcel of one unit per ten acres is not exceeded. Structures shall remain single family, BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 9 _ ��� separated, on individual lots having an area of at least 7,200 square feet. B. Yard (setback) requirements. The requirements for R-1 zone shall apply. C. Heights. The requirements for R-1 zone shall apply, except that no structure shall be placed in such a way that its outline is visible above a ridgeline. D. Auto storage. On -site parking requirements shall follow Chapter 9,.160 OFF STREET PARKING. E. Equipment. No roof -top equipment for heating, cooling or other purposes will be permitted. F. Architectural treatment. The architectural treatment of structures within the HC Zone shall be compatible with the setting of the structure and shall be generally con- sistent with requirements of the desert setting and other architectural treatments found elsewhere in the City. Use of indigenous materials for the structure of walls should be encouraged. Fencing and walls must follow SR Zoning requirements. G. Landscaping. On the cut or pad occupied by the structure, landscaping may be left to the choice of the homeowner, providing some selection of drought -tolerant species is observed. Elsewhere on the site (or open space), native vegetation shall be undisturbed (or recreated after approved grading). H. Utilities. All utilities shall be placed underground, except for water tanks and substations which shall be appropriately screened and/or painted in colors to blend into the background. 9.145.055 DIVISION OF H.C. ZONED LANDS. In order to assure compliance with the provisions of this chapter where a planned residential development is not required pursuant to Chapter 9.148., there shall be submitted, for every property within or partially within H.C. Zoned land, along with every tentative subdivision map and parcel map filed for approval, in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Title 13, a preliminary grading plan (and other requirements of this chapter) showing at least one practical, usable, accessible building site which can be developed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter for each lot or parcel. BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 10 - 9.145.060 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. A. Transfers of development rights shall follow the Procedures and standards presented in Chapter 9.146 Transfer of Development Rights. B. Any owner of property within the H.C. Zone may transfer development rights from the H.C. Zone on the basis of one residential unit per 10 acres. C. The property receiving the transfer of development rights may be: 1. A subdivided portion of the same property below "the toe of the slope," as presented in a Specific Plan; or, 2. by means of sale to any area of the City which has been General Plan designated as medium density (8 units per acre) or higher (except the SR zone within the Cove area which is single family on small lots in character), provided the increase for any particular parcel does not exceed 20% of the General Plan density designation. D. Any owner of property with the H.C. Zone may sell, bequeath or transfer the development rights of the property, in accordance with this Chapter (9.145) and the Chapter on Transfer of Development Rights or Credits (9.146) to any governmental jurisdiction or any properly organized nonprofit organization whose charter allows for the ownership and/or transfer of development rights. Said governmental jurisdiction or nonprofit organization may retain or sell or transfer acquire development rights in accordance with the Chapter on Transfer of Development Rights (9.146). 9.145.065 ALTERATION OF THE LOCATION OF THE TOE OF THE SLOPE. If, as a result of an approved developmental project, a flood control structure is placed higher on a hillside area so that an area of alluvial fan becomes protected from flooding potential (or if the location of the toe of the slope is moved by altering some other criterion), the new area below "the toe of the slope" shall remain zoned H.C. (Hillside Conservation), and the Conditional Use Permit approved for the site shall determine the effective density of the developable portion by virtue of the transfer of development rights from the hillside areas to the developable portion of the property. BJ/ORDDRFT.003 9.145.070 RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE. A. Those areas located within a hillside development controlled by this chapter which are to remain as undeveloped open spaces, such as undevelopable slopes and natural landmarks, etc., which are to be used for game preserve, recreational, or open space purposes, may be offered, through dedication, to a governmental jurisdiction, or to a not -for -profit land trust, conservancy, or similar organization whose charter allows for the ownership of development rights which will preserve the natural open space of the hillside area in perpetuity. B. If, however, the public agency, or City, or land trust, conservancy, or similar organization does not accept such an offer (or if such an offer is not made), the Developer shall make provisions for the ownership and care of the open space in such a manner that there can be necessary protection and maintenance thereof. Such area shall be provided with appropriate access and shall be designated as separate parcels which may be maintained through special fees charged to the residents of the subject development or through an appropriate homeowner's association or maintenance district. where necessary and appropriate, maintenance in perpetuity shall be guaranteed through the bond of the Developer. 9.145.075 CHANGE OF DESIGNATION. All lands within the Hillside Conservation Zone are designated on the General Plan Land Use Map as "open space." A property owner may propose a change of designation from "open space" and "HC" zones by means all of the of the following procedures: A. General Plan Amendment from "open space" designation to an equally appropriate category. B. A change of zone from HC to an equally appropriate zone; C. Submission of a specific plan for the property; D. Satisfaction of the engineering and other reviews required in Section 9.145.035 and .040; E. Compliance with all other sections of this Chapter except 9.145.020; 9.145.050 A,B,C; 9.145.060; and 9.145.065. C)3� BJ/ORDDRFT.003 - 12 - CHAPTER 9.146 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS SECTIONS• 9.146.05 Generally 9.146.10 Definitions 9.146.15 Procedures 9.146.20 Timing 9.146.25 Documentation 9.146.05 GENERALLY A. All transfers of development rights or credits shall follow the definitions, procedures, timing, and documentation presented in this Chapter, and shall observe the restrictions and guidelines presented in other enabling chapters, such as Chapter 9.145, Hillside Conservation Zone, and others which may be from time to time adopted enabling transfers of development rights or credits. B. The purpose of this Chapter is to provide the process by which development rights or credits may be transferred from donor parcels to receiving parcels such as in Open Space land use designations to enable it -to be preserved as open space, and other purposes which may be adopted in other enabling legislation. Such transfers of development rights or credits may be within the same property, or may take place from one property to another by means of sale. C. Transfers shall take place under the guidance of the City and shall be documented by means of recordation. 9.146.10 DEFINITIONS A. Development Right or Credit: A potential entitlement created by a land use designation and, by adoption of a zoning category, applying to a parcel of land, to construct one dwelling unit per a given number of square feet or per a given number of acres, which can only be exercised when the development right or credit has been transferred pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and the enabling Chapter, from a donor parcel to a receiving parcel, and all other requirements of law are fulfilled. BJ/ORDDRFT.001 - 1 - B. Donor Parcel: A parcel, from which all potential entitlements for residential development are transferred (by means of sale, or transfer to another parcel) and thereby extinguished. A subdivision shall be required to separate developable from undevelopable portions of the parcel. C. Receiving Parcel: A parcel, to which potential entitlements for residential development are transferred up to the limits of the enabling Chapters, and exist in addition to any potential entitlements created by General Plan Land Use Designation and Density Specification and in addition to any zoning which applies to the parcel. D. Fractions: Development rights or credits may be transferred as a fraction carried to the second decimal place, rounded up or down to the second place following the rule of the third decimal being 0-4, round down; 5-9 round up to the next digit in the second decimal place. When applied to the receiving parcel, the number of credits (carried to the second decimal place) will be spread across the acreage of the receiving parcel and will be translated into an increment of additional development entitlements carried to two decimal places per acre. E. Density Bonuses: Transferred development rights or credits shall not be counted in the basis for density bonuses granted for providing for affordable housing or good design or special amenities. The order in which bonuses and transferred rights or credits are applied shall be as follows: 1. The base density ranges as per the General Plan; 2. Density bonuses applied for providing affordable housing (up to 30 percent of the base density alone); 3. Density bonuses for good design or special amenities (up to 10 percent of the base density alone); 4. Transferred densities added to the final figure of any density bonuses. Transferred densities shall not become a part of the base on which bonuses are figured. 5. In no case shall the sum of all density bonus and tranferrerd densities (if all are maximized) exceed 60% of the base density in the General Plan. F. Enabling Chapter: A chapter of Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code which creates and further specifies and limits the transfer of development rights or credits, such as 9.145 "Hillside Conservation Zone". 11A BJ/ORDDRFT.001 - 2 - G. Timing: The time limits as specified in Section 9.146.20 Timing. H. Documentation: The requirements for City approval, recordation and notice to the City of La Quinta of such recordation, following example language specified in 9.146.25 Documentation. 9.146.15 PROCEDURES A. The enabling Chapter shall specify by class the donor Parcels and the receiving parcels, the number of residential development rights or credits which can be transferred per square footage or per acre; and the limits of development rights or credits which can be transferred to any one parcel. B. The donor parcels, from which development rights are being removed must: 1. Remove all development rights or credits at the same time (residual development rights or credits cannot be left on the property); 2. Be mappable; according to the Subdivision Map Act requirements, i.e., a legal description and a total acreage will be required to be recorded. 3. Record a document which acknowledges that all development rights or credits for the described parcel have been extinguished and that no further residential development can occur on the parcel. C. The receiving parcel, to which development rights or credits are being transferred, must: 1. Be mappable; according to the Subdivision Map Act requirements, i.e., a legal description and a total acreage will be required to be recorded; 2. Record a document of affixture (or attachment) which has been attested to by the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, tying the transferred development rights or credits to a specific parcel, in perpetuity, following the sense of the example of language contained in Section 9.146.25 Documentation. D. This document of transfer and affixture must be recorded. Evidence of the Recordation must be supplied to the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta within 30 days of the date of attestation by the City Clerk. BJ/ORDDRFT.001 _ 3 _ E. The City Clerk shall only attest to a transfer of development rights or credits upon receipt of written authorization from the City Manager. The City Manager shall only authorize such transfer after receiving a report from the Planning and Development Department containing a recommendation and a synopsis of the engineering report from the Public Works Director. F. If a property consists of both undevelopable and developable portions, the applicant may apply for the subdivision of the parcel to allow transfer of rights from the undevelopable portion to the developable portion. 9.146.20 TIMING A. A condition of approval of the development rights transfer shall specify the donor and receiving parcels subject to the transfer which shall be recorded no later than 90 days from the date of Council approval. B. In the event that a parcel of hillside land (with development rights still attached) is granted, bequeathed, sold, transferred, given or otherwise becomes the property of a not -for -profit land trust, conservancy, or public agency, the receiving entity shall have an unlimited period from the date of receipt in which to dispose of the development rights by sale or other means. When development rights ate transferred to -a specific receiving parcel, the 90 day time limit shall apply as in "A" above. 9.146.25 DOCUMENTATION A. There shall be recorded for the donor parcel a document having the sense of the following: 1. A legal description and a total acreage of the parcel or portion of the parcel. 2. The total number of development rights or credits being removed from the property. 3. An acknowledgement that no further residential development rights or credits shall accrue to the parcel in perpetuity. 4. The assessor's parcel number of the parcel to which the development rights or credits are being transferred. 5. An attestation by the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta (dated). 6. The signature, name and address of the owner of the parcel. BJ/ORDDRFT.001 - 4 - B. There shall be recorded for the receiving parcel a document having the sense of the following: 1. "In addition to the number of dwellings units on this parcel APN# (legal description and total acreage attached as Exhibit A) which may be permitted by the City of La Quinta by virtue of the General Plan Land Use and Density Designations, this parcel shall be permitted (number) of additional dwelling units per acre, which have been transferred to this parcel pursuant to Chapter 9.146 of the Municipal Code, Transfer of Development Rights." 2. "These additional dwelling units are hereby affixed to this parcel APN# and may not be further transferred, sold, traded, or otherwise removed from this parcel, except by the purchase by the City of La Quinta or other public agency authorized by the City." 3. The Assessor's Parcel Number(s) of the donor Parcel(s) from which the development rights or credits have been removed and transferred and affixed to this parcel. 4. The signature of the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta affixed below attests to the legitimate transfer of these development rights to this property (as described in Exhibit A). City Clerk, City of La Quinta Owner of APN NAME ADDRESS Date Date 1143 BJ/ORDDRFT.001 - 5 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 147 which was introduced on the 19th day of September, 1989 and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 3rd day of October, 1989, not being less than 5 days after date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted in three (3) places with the City of La Quinta as specified in a resolution of the City Council. SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California MEMORANDUM HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: MARCH 13, 1990 SUBJECT: TEN FOOT BLOCK WALL ALONG WASHINGTON STREET BACKGROUND: Current regulations limit the maximum height of walls to 6-feet. The normal process used to deviate from this request would be through a Variance. However, a Noise Study was prepared for the City back in March of 1989. The Study indicated that the ultimate traffic on Washington Street would impact the Montero Estates area. The recommendation indicated that a ten to twelve foot noise wall would be necessary to mitigate this traffic noise. The Planning Director has referred this request for Planning Commission action because of its uniqueness REQUEST: The property owner, Mr. William & Ruth Hannan has retained a contractor to construct a ten foot block wall. This wall will be located west of the existing Oleander along Washington Street. (The wall would not be visible from Washington Street.) Joven Engineering has provided structural information for the wall. ANALYSIS: 1. The best solution would be to have the wall constructed at one time as opposed to a piece meal approach. 2. A Noise Study has been prepared indicating that a ten to twelve foot wall would be necessary to mitigate noise along Washington. 3. The wall will be hidden from view along Washington Street. 4. The property owner has indicated he has approval from the Homeowner's Association. (Letter enclosed) BJ/MEMOJH.052 - 1 - 0 RECOMMENDATION: By minute action approve the installation of the requested ten foot block wall subject to the site plan submitted. Attachment: 1. Letter 2. Building application 3. Engineering calculations 4. Noise Study BJ/MEMOJFI.052 - 2 - CAS TTAS T HOMEOWNERS AS SOCTATTON P- O- Box 716 La Quinta CA C3,2253 February 27, 1989 City Planning Department CITY OF LA QUINTA P. 0. Box 1504 La Quinta CA 92253 RE: William & Ruth Hanan 49-470 Montero La Quinta CA Gentlemen: Please be advised that Casitas I Homeowners Association has no objection to the construction of a wall by Mr. and Mrs. Hanan at their above referenced residence. Yours truly, - MARGX ET MIELE MM/at Hunan 49-470 &eni" Monieso, D. 0. Box 627 Lo /Quinfa, California 92253 l4-�i<.��..'-'i Z�w—..i✓ 111-E/��� J f °,� tJ P.O. BOX 1504 78105 CALLE ESTADO LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 APPLICATION ONLY City e— 6� )M a chasm. vGr) Eve, Address Lic. 1t LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I win Dcemed under Provisions of Chapter 0 (commencing with section MDtembn 3 of tle Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and SIGMAlrU E DATE OWNEIFBUILDER DECLARATION I hasby afrum tat I am exempt f con the Contractors License Law for the following reason (Sac. 7031.sausnesa and, Roles9vs Code: Antcity w mrny white reputes a parml a construct after. Lnpose, dsmba. or vapor any srxNe. prior to As issuance also repass MO Sp4ant b such penal m as ed smarnenl that he Issconsed Wrsuont ro the proreiws d the CaWacior! License, Law. C�te� 9 (cmmoncYp with Section 70W) d Overton 9 of B,2aMffi and Ra/essiars Code. or dui. Iw s exempt thamr., and Me owns W Bw asaged emevfio ,. Any sipbthn or SerLo, 7031.5 by any aWlcahl for a Wane srdyach, sae appf®d m a chi penalty of not move Mon Me, hnbed doles (s500). ❑ 1, as owns Of the Prop", or reply employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is raft intuaded W offered far sale. (Sec. 7014, Bofaness a,1 nahe,abs coos: The csvacmrs License law one, nc Apply m an owner of pmpeny w hiN or Jeo w' n thereon and wen dees such wart Isrsell or Mroehph her own anpo'ese. Posited shay such kryvo wnsn l as rod aaerrdW P offered for sale. 0, Mweror, me bddrq s irprwarsrf a sold within one yea d conpnoun, the .._busow wit Mre fM burden dprwwp tad Ire i/M hit o i*Pare b the Propose of saa) ❑ 1, s owns of the property, am exclush" contracting with licensed contractors to eon strut to project. (Sac. 7014, A.. and Rom sbs Code: The cou scm s license few ones nor firs e an awn d Prop" who build' P on rows Mere, and who contxfs W such Past., we, a contractor(s) tossed pursuant a, the Contractor's Lkenne Law.) 7 1 am exerW undo Sec . s P.C. for this reason WORKEN5 COMPENSATION DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that I hate a cenifiate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worn COMPO L4 dion Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3300, Labor Coda) PoRry No. Company ❑ Copy is filed with thecity. ❑ CMilied cWY is hereby /urnished. CERT FICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKEJtS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (tips bacon, need not y c'orydeten 0 fM pednw s Our Pm hundred doses (stool muetion sbra) 1 owtfy that in the petmnsrca of the wok for Mich this permit la Issued, I shall not leeroplor ofmperwrh M any maws w W as to becne subject to the workers' Compensation dross DAa Owner NOTICE TO APPIRAVr /, aNw nwNIV IRA cwasata d Essrrpl(s, you, slouH wo,m, ssyac M the Nbkors' Cmpsuatlm "Wsom, d IRA ids Cods,. you meal IrMhwen mrpy wOh awd, Povlsirs s tYSL»mi Nssl y damned rewkM. CONSTRICTION LENDING AGENCY worts mr I hereby Oat tare is cwnsimnion lending agency for the performance ofthe which pemdl b issued. (Sec.:1097. CmV Code.) Loodkes Nang Larders AM This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to espiratidn t won, temunmar is suspended for 180 days. I onus Vml I have road this application and state that the above Information Is correct. I agree (o c"= with an Cl and county ordi arnrm and state Urwa misting to Wilding combuctfeq and hereby autlrarira mprasantathes of this city to enter the shows, mentioned properly for inspection purpwea Signature el appUcwvL Dab Nailing Atha* CRY. sea zp1 LDING: TYPE CONST GRP. Number._ 4fgAi T,E,Go C _C Y,y 7—" Description :t Description Sq. FL Size No. No. Dw. Stories Units New ❑ Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ Estimated Valuation PERMIT AMOUNT Plan Chk. Dep. Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mach. Electrical Plumbing S.M.I. O Grading Driveway Enc. Infrastructure TOTAL REMARKS ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from Center Line Side Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Issued by: Date Permit Validated by: Validation: FINANCE I 19LWJ<.WALL AC)OJ / 3 �Ot161J F-W� to ;e;Gkk� yq 410 APNJIDA 'HONIER0 kA 40I7A QA 100 61.6CK dJAlt_ DESl67./ F^U" 1,Zx1.4x.15xI.o xllpsF psr ov- Zan fife. D Fleas' S0U1 GO-W 1.0x 1.0X,3x80PfF= 25.zPs1° e/Jly S*a- I.Ox 1.0 x-3 A591sF Il. UgC 2312G H pip F c t "1'(17.4-4)y ul> r.y Fu1UD a /o(ZI,t/'e� — 214 Gau:kui MOM613'1' _L> UPPER WALL (7' of WALL AadVIC) Ijpry _ 21. 2 (l)2_ 523. y.3'# d = 75" I onsi I �� �}, ;2V•3/1480(I•S3�3.75 = •e7 x 2.67, .19 aj <.2/J (,V4 @S2%��> 10_ 2�3z(a r5� = .0017 2/K � G.99 n= 9q a>I•qa gym. S zq.3 1 6.99 19C PSI 4- z25psl —nnLWT CO)8*6 6F u ALL 1AWS = 19Y. q'e 8, 6L,dK n = 40 2 0l<5.3 G=1•d8 z 21.4 ilo a 107014: 2 !{Sa /e70'# = . 16 lu2 , 1.33 = . I'I INz L . Z Igi '�4s Le1A 1480 (La3) 5.3 2 rr _ 1070 6.44) = 18S P51 2.25 psl Soup GRwT t� (5.3)i 1.33 v -- 2/4 * AY• 219/S i (12) = S-gesl i MIRE 5-Z AMRNE11 REF. tSt WACc- HPW>)U 99- 410 Av4k(cw MON11W —LA Q(II)JA eA 2 of 3 10I E,,Od< WALL D6s/ram rA—YOP- of SAF 7Y Wl' of t0ALL 3.5(6q) t 1(5q) > M4 vJ-f OF FTe, 3 (160� 1.5 b754 S4ABILtr'{ McMEA"r 6R(1.5) +9) 2020 FS = 2020if /.61 > 1.5 1070�' -•� e = 3 _ 2ozo -/070 79 Z 1347 Solt P2ESSu� = 134i 4- '� 3� (I.33 S2 PsF< loaeps� Aua✓ ulblvc = y M41"�- 53q> 21yx fat=T FS = 539 Z. 5 21 �/ YQ,>vIDE uC4ik. BLOCK WALL W% 0-'#5 @ 12-%' cew"ee of IMLL-) Foe UP/LIA 7 r aF WAcL; (:PW-F '/NoSe UU-!. wLri+ a A)ftCllt. LoWEQ 3.5' o6 WAIL *9s @ /L'% 6'VA Fyz; seuo awr PRovit, 3o-o" c le",-A9K couTwtaJS FwtuG wrrk/ U4k:rlc,4L lJ &D A[ioUE OV D .3 —*/fs co�Y/�4odS �I - 200urtl . y = 4a anrcl 1/90 0 r V1 2 4i co„1 0 Top OF urtzc L mc• HcatluTe[. — #4 JEa:j�! t5"czL &C WALL - GaoJ7 4"'1 c6LLs W/ A wr*eCAV(. ; oP 7 poi 4vAU- j Suup Lri,-r L4]�62 3,S eG NA=L-` 06 at&UAl- IVW&WOO O)M6 0 CL IIIII�' 4s ® EACH FACE ego -rwi-> u re.n.+e- 2 1 C1tA� 1 -07Yxkvi g_oJ l B10C.K WhL.L- Advi-evaj 49- 470 AU60M M*Mre¢0 to 4 wu-AA , 'A Joyaj 60-t EER/uG I-2z-91 0�3 °F 3°F 3 �u i v CAS = TAS 2 HOMEOWNERS AS SOC =AT = ON P- O- SOx 716 La Qu into CA 9 2 2 5 3 February 27, 1989 City Planning Department CITY OF LA QUINTA P. 0. Box 1504 La Quinta CA 92253 RE: William & Ruth Hanan 49-470 Montero La Quinta CA Gentlemen: Please be advised that Casitas I Homeowners Association has no objection to the construction of a wall by Mr. and Mrs. Hanan at their above referenced residence. Yours truly, MARGA'RET MIELE MM/at J %J k U 78-105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - 161% 564-2246 FAX (619) 564-5617 March 6, 1990 Mr. Larry Deason 67-172 Mission Drive Cathedral City, CA 92234 SUBJECT: TEN FOOT HIGH GARDEN WALL ON WASHINGTON STREET Dear Mr. Deason: I have reviewed the process associated with the issuance of a building permit for a ten foot high garden wall. The matter will be referred to the Planning Commission as a Director's referral because of the uniqueness of the garden wall. The normal procedure for this would have been the processing of a Variance. I have tentatively scheduled this for the March 13th, 1990 meeting starting at 7:00 P.M. It is important that you or the property owner, be in attendance at this meeting to answer any questions the Commission may have. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JH:bja cc: William Hannon Frank Reynolds, City Engineer Tom Hartung, Building Official BJ/LTRJH.063 - 1 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 MONTERO ESTATES NOISE STUDY GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL AND ENERGY ENGINEERS 1621 E. SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE -K° SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, 92701 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS Marcn 7, 1989 M 0 N T E R 0 N O I S E E S T A T E S S T U D Y C I T Y O F L A Q U I N T A Prepared by: Prepared for: Gordon'Bricken MR. FRANK REYNOLDS, Director President Public Works/City Engineer CITY OF LA QUINTA /mmb 78-105 Calle Estado P. 0. Box 1504 La Quinta, California, 92253 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 • Phone(714) 835-0249 0 0 J GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SECTION SUBJECT PAGE TITLE PAGE .................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................. ii SUMMARY....................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................. 2 2.0 MEASURES OF IMPACT ............................ 2 3.0 1985 MEASUREMENT PROGRAM AND DATA ............. 6 4.0 PROJECT MEASUREMENTS .......................... 7 5.0 INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA .................... 11 5.1 EXISTING CASE ......................... 11 5.2 FUTURE CONDITIONS ..................... 13 5.3 CONCLUSIONS ........................... 14 6.0 POTENTIAL MITIGATION .......................... 15 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............... 17 TABLES 1 ACCEPTABLE EXTERIOR SOUND LEVELS FOR LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ................................. 4 2 NOISE ORDINANCE -- LA QUINTA NOISE ELEMENT.... 4 3 PERCENTAGE OF INTELLIGIBILITY OF 1,000 SINGLE SYLLABLEWORDS ................................ 5 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 • Phone(714) 835-0249 Ll'S Page iii T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S -- CONTINUED SECTION TABLES PAGE 4 NOISE LEVELS OF TYPICAL SOURCES ............... 6 5 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT POSITIONS ............. 7 6 24 HOUR HOURLY MEASUREMENT DATA POSITION...... 8 7 REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS ........................ 9 8 SPEED SAMPLES ................................. 9 9 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POSITIONS #1, #2, AND #3 TO LOCATIONS IN THE TRACT ........................ 10 10 ABSOLUTE NOISE LEVELS ......................... 11 11 COMPARISON OF EXISTING NOISE LEVELS WITH GOVERNMENT STANDARDS .......................... 12 12 FUTURE NOISE LEVELS ........................... 13 13 COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE LEVELS WITH GOVERNMENTSTANDARDS .......................... 14 14 NOISE LEVELS AT LISTENER FOR TWO WALL CASES FOR LISTENER AT 200 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OFTHE ROADWAY ................................ 15 15 REDUCTION IN NOISE LEVEL SOUND WALL AT THE CURB FOR POINT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE TENNIS COURTS........................................ 16 EXHIBITS 1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS.................................. 18 2 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS .. ...................... 19 3 24 HOUR NOISE LEVELS .......................... 20 4 24 HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....................... 21 5 NOISE CONTOURS ................................ 22 6 BASIC CURVE ................................... 23 APPENDICES 1 NOISE RATING METHODS .......................... 24 2 1985 MEASUREMENT RESULTS ...................... 28 3 1989 24 HOUR MEASUREMENT DATA ................. 30 ow, J �j Page iv T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S -- CONTINUED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SECTION APPENDICES PAGE 4 1989 TRAFFIC COUNTS ........................... 42 5 MEASUREMENT CHARTS ............................ 46 6 SAMPLE 2 BARRIER CALCULATIONS ................. 66 7 WASHINGTON SOUND WALL CALCULATIONS............ 70 O b. �� GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS S U M M A R Y Measurement and an analysis have -)een conducted along Washington at Montero Estates. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The existing noise levels do not produce a significant impact on the Tract as measured by conventional standards except on the lots adjacent to Washington. (2) Future traffic volumes will rise to 35,000 cars a day from the present 8,500. This represents a 6 dBA increase in noise, or put another way, a 60 percent increase in loudness. (3) At the future traffic volumes, all areas of the Tract will have a significant impact as measured by conventional standards. (4) To achieve a significant noise reduction now, and to provide a reduction of future impacts, a sound barrier should be erected along Washington that is 10 to 12 feet in height. 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 0 Phone(714) 835-0249 r GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS no INTRODUCTION In 1985, Gordon Bricken and Associates, Inc., prepared the Noise Element of the General Plan for the City of La Quinta,. That document established the current noise environment of the City and the projected noise environment. Recommendations were made for a noise policy based on acceptable standards for noise control. In the Technical Analysis for the Noise Element, Washington was identified as a major source of environmental noise. Policy 1.10 states: "Examine the consequences to the developments along Washington, Eisenhower, Jefferson, 54th, and others recently developed with perimeter walls to ascertain the potential for non-compliance with adopted compatibility Guidelines". Particular note was taken in the Technical Analysis of the existing developments along Washington, including the develo- ment that is the subject of this study. In this study, the objective is to address, more specifi- cally than was possible in the General Plan, the noise impacts on the sub -division and potential mitigation measures. 2.0 MEASURES OF IMPACT This study was generated out of concerns expressed by the residents. In a sense, then, that expression could be taken as one evidence of noise impact. The object in the study is to quantify the noise levels, relate those to widely used measures of impact, and to examine potential mitigation measures. The most widely used measurement metric is the "A" Weighted average noise level (called Leq). The average noise level is related to both the noise level and the frequency of occurrence over a specific time. One event of 70 dBA in ten minutes has a lower average noise level than ten events of 70 dBA in ten minutes. CALTRANS and the Federal Highway Administration's Design Standards 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 • Phone(714) 835-0249 a. ' 062 Page 3 are based on the average noise level in the highest hour in a 24- hour period. The State of California, Office of Noise Control, recommends the use of a metric called the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). This is an artificial term based on the 24 hour average noise level. The actual 24 average noise level is adjusted in certain hours to compensate for increased sensitivity to noise. As a result, the CNEL value is always higher than the true 24 hour average noise level. For an expanded discussion of noise and the terminology, please see Appendix 1 -- NOISE RATING METHODS. The California State Office of Noise Control presents a Land Use Compatibility Chart which has been widely used in California Land Use Planning. This chart is shown on Exhibit 1. It shows that the "acceptable" levels for residential uses range from 55 to 70 dBA CNEL. This range reflects the fact that various conditions affect what is "acceptable". In the La Quinta General Plan, 60 dBA CNEL was identified as the acceptable upper limit of residential noise. The CALTRANS/FHWA criteria is an average level of 67 dBA in the highest hour (called LegH). The Federal Environ- mental Protection Agency states 55 dBA average in 24 hours is an "acceptable" community level [called Leq(24)) . Although average noise levels correlate best to actual human reaction, the average person is generally not consciously aware of the relationship between his experience and the average noise levels. Most people think of noise in terms primarily of the maximum noise level, and only secondarily the number of exposures, or duration frequency of exposure. The average person tends to speak of the "average" noise level in terms of single event noise levels and frequency of occurrences. This is more "logical", even though the information can be expressed as a single number. For example, ten cars at 70 dBA over a ten minute period is more easily understood than saying the average noise level is 53 dBA. Also, it conveys the essence of the exposure more accurately. In traffic studies, the fluctuating nature of the individual vehicles creates yet another complication. Those ten cars are, in reality, ten individual events with ten separate maximum noise levels. To simplify the problems for discussion, the average maximum value of the ten events is used. For example, if there were ten events ranging from 60 to 70 dBA, they would be referred to as ten events of equal magnitude of 66 dBA. The measurement metric used for this purpose is the one percent (1%) level (also referred to as Ll). With this introduction, the compatibility criteria is summarized in Table 1 on the following page. Page 4 TABLE 1 ACCEPTABLE EXTERIOR SOUND LEVELS FOR LAND USE COMPATIBILITY SOURCE La Quinta General Plan CALTRANS/FHWA EPA ACCEPTABLE EXTERIOR SOUND LEVEL 60 CNEL 67 dBA average in highest hour 55 dBA average, 24-hours One of the "hidden" factors in the typical Land Use Compatibility Chart and the subsequent criteria is a built in acceptance of the fact that the basic vehicular noise output cannot be regulated by the City. Thus, in a way, the "acceptability" criteria is compromised to what is technically feasible and potentially implementable. Interestingly, to control source noise, cities adopt Noise Control Ordinances. These ordinances are usually more conservative in the allowed levels than is the case expressed via the Land Use Compatibility criteria. A sample Noise Ordinance is presented in the La Quinta Noise Element that suggested the Standard given in Table 2. TABLE 2 NOISE ORDINANCE -- LA QUINTA NOISE ELEMENT ALLOWED LEVEL(dBA) 7 A.M. TO 7 P.M. 7 P.M. TO 10 P.M. DURATION IN ANY HOUR 50 45 30 Minutes or more 55 50 15 Minutes 60 55 5 Minutes 65 55 1 Minute 70 65 Maximum Interestingly, this converts to an average noise level of 55 dBA from 7:OO A.M. to 10:00 P.M. and 50 dBA for 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. Compare this to the CALTRANS/FHWA criteria of 67 dBA and the deviation is apparent. With some mathematical manipulation, the criteria converts to about 58 CNEL. This is only slightly different than the City's CNEL criteria and within the 55 to 70 CNEL "acceptability" band of the Land Use Compatibility Chart. Notwithstanding the various "Standards", one is still confronted with comparing noise levels expressed with common points of reference. Two of the easiest to understand are those condi- tions that interrupt speakers (or listeners), and events experi- Page 5 enced in everyday life. A chart comparing the condition of outside noise to speaking effort is shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 PERCENTAGE OF INTELLIGIBILITY OF 1,000 SINGLE SYLLABLE WORDS(I) AMBIENT LEVEL(2) VOICE LEVEL 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Normal (3) 80 70 41 29 0 0 0 Raised 90 90 70 41 29 0 0 Very Loud 100 90 90 89 74 41 22 (1) Sentence intelligibility is higher due to the ability to "fill in" context even with missed words. Intelligibility means the ability to write down the correct word. (2) Normally taken as the average level in continuously fluctu- ating sources with a range of plus/minus 5 dBA. However, may also be used to address the instantaneous effect of any short-term noise. (3) Level at three feet, male voice This scale would suggest that for the CALTRANS/FHWA criteria of 67 dBA, less than 29 percent of the words are intelligible with a "normal" voice. The chart shown in Table 4 (following page) illustrates some typical noise levels that we experience everyday. Page 6 TABLE 4 NOISE LEVELS OF TYPICAL SOURCES SOURCE Vacuum cleaner at operating position..... Interior of an auto ...................... Aircraft overhead ........................ Lawnmowers at operating position......... Electric typewriter operating............ Computer printer ......................... Dog barking at 2 feet .................... Desert at night (no loud sources)........ Diesel truck at curbside ................. 3.0 1985 MEASUREMENT PROGRAM AND DATA LEVEL 75 to 80 65 to 80 60 to 70 75 to 85 65 to 75 65 to 70 75 to 90 35 to 50 80 to 85 During the General Plan Process, a 24-hour measurement position was established north of 50th on the west side of Washington adjacent to the study area. The 24-hour average noise level values and the average maximum level from that 1985 Study are contained in Appendix 2. The recorded CNEL level was 66.4 dBA. 4.0 PROJECT MEASUREMENTS A series of measurements was conducted along Washington and in the Montero Tract on Thursday, February 9, and Friday, February 10, 1989. Two longterm locations were establish- ed at the existing wall line. A series of nine other locations were established on a short term basis to determine the relative differences between the long term locations along Washington and other locations in the Tract. The various locations are noted on Exhibit 2 and listed in Table 5 (following page). Position #1 recorded 24 hours with the data reported in one hour intervals. Position #2 recorded 18 hours with data reported in five minute intervals. In addition to the noise data, a traffic counter was set out opposite Position A. This recorded the total two-way traffic. Also, a radar gun was used to sample speeds at Positions A and B. Short traffic count samples were taken to ascertain the composition of the vehicles. The 24-hour data at Position #1 is listed in Table 6 Actual records are contained in Appendix 3. The data is also plotted on Exhibit 3. (?G6 Page 7 POSITION #1 lA 1B #2 2A 2B 2C 3 3A TABLE 5 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT POSITIONS DISTANCE FROM CENTERLINE(1) LOCATION 42' At curb on-line with Calle Felipe 160' West side of Tennis Court 700' 48895 Avenita Montero in -line with Calle Felipe 42' At curb on-line with Calle Huerta 140' West side of Tennis Court 400' 49611 Avenita Montero in -line with Calle Felipe 250' 78461 Calle Huerta 34' At curb opposite 49415 Avenue Montero 100' 49415 Avenita Montero (1) North of Washington Page 8 TABLE 6 24 HOUR HOURLY MEASUREMENT DATA POSITION HOUR Le LI- TRAFFIC COUNTS 0000 54.0 68.5 50 0100 52.0 67.0 33 0200 52.0 67.5 12 0300 54.5 69.5 14 0400 58.5 70.5 21 0500 64.0 75.0 88 0600 65.5 74.5 336 0700 65.5 75.5 611 0800 69.0 78.5 608 0900 66.0 76.0 513 1000 64.5 74.0 515 1100 61.0 74.5 581 1200 64.5 74.5 552 1300 68.5 76.0 559 1400 65.0 73.5 633 1500 65.5 75.0 754 1600 66.0 74.5 646 1700 63.0 72.0 696 1800 62.5 72.5 458 1900 63.0 73.0 292 2000 60.5 70.5 216 2100 60.5 71.0 170 2200 59.0 71.0 136 2300 56.0 68.0 82 TOTAL: CNEL 67.8 - - 24-HOUR 63.8 - 8,536 HIGHEST HOUR 69.0 78.5 696 b Page 9 The data from Position #2 (contained in Appendix 3) when matched to that of Position #1 indicates an average 2 dBA higher noise levels. Thus, the reference values at Positions #1 and #2 are given in Table 7. TABLE 7 REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS(l) 24-HOUR HIGHEST HOUR (2) POSITION L1 CNEL Leq Leq Ll #1 74 68 64 69 79 #2 76 70 66 71 81 (1) Values rounded to nearest integer (2) 8:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. value The Position #2 CNEL is 4 dBA higher than the value measured in 1985 at the same location. The traffic count (Appendix 4) is listed in Table 6 and plotted on Exhibit 4. It is useful to note that the highest noise hour (8:00 to 9:00 A.M.) does not correspond to the highest daily traffic hour (5:00 to 6:00 P.M.), although it remains the highest A.M. peak hour. The speed samples are given in Table 8. TABLE 8 SPEED SAMPLES POSITION TIME SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND #1 11:30 A.M. 37 37 12:30 P.M. 41 41 #2 2:30 P.M. 49 - 2:00 P.M. 50 48 3:45 P.M. 49 - 11:30 A.M. 51 45 The speed samples indicate that at Position #1 the speeds are less than Position #2. This explains the higher noise levels at Position #2. While Position #2 northbound and southbound values are the same, it is estimated that the northbound morning speeds e 6 9 Page 10 are higher than the southbound afternoon speeds. This, accounts for the fact that the 8:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. noise levels are higher than the 5:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. levels, even though the latter has a higher volume of traffic. The differential levels from Position #1 and #2, and the other locations are given in Table 9. The measurement charts are contained in Appendix 5. TABLE 9 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POSITIONS #1, #2, AND #3 TO LOCATIONS IN THE TRACT ACTUAL PREDICTED POSITION DIFFERENCE DIFFERENCE(1) REFERENCE P1A - 10 - 6 P1 PlB - 16 - 12 P1 P2A - 13 - 5 P2 P2B - 14 - 10 P2 P2C - 18 - 8 P2 P3B - 14 - 5 P3 (1) Assumes no building shielding. For the purpose of setting absolute levels, Position #3 may be considered to be equivalent to Position #2. Using the reference levels in Table 7 and the difference values shown in Table 9, the absolute values at every position can be determined. This data is given in Table 10 on the following page. Page it TABLE 10 ABSOLUTE NOISE LEVELS 24-HOUR HIGHEST HOUR POSITION L1 CNEL Leq LI Leq #1 74 68 64 79 69 #IA 64 58 54 69 59 #lB 58 52 48 63 53 #2 76 70 66 81 71 #2A 63 57 53 68 58 #2B 62 56 52 67 57 #2C 58 52 48 63 53 #3 76 70 66 81 71 #3A 62 56 52 66 57 From this data, it is possible to plot the general noise contours for the Tract. This is shown on Exhibit 5. The basic curve is shown on Exhibit 6 (illustrating how the data tracks the predicted case). Inspection of Exhibit 6 indicates that Positions along Montero are only 2 to 5 dBA lower than would occur if the homes in the Tract were not present. It also illustrates that closer to Washington (Position #2C), there is greater shielding from the existing buildings (12 dBA). 5.0 INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA 5.1 EXISTING CASE Table 11 lists the data in Table 10 is compared to the "acceptable" values given in Table 1. The results are given on the following page. Pace 12 TABLE 11 COMPARISON OF EXISTING NOISE LEVELS WITH GOVERNMENT STANDARDS 24-HOUR HIGHEST HOUR POSITION CNEL(1) Leq(2) Leq(3) #1 + 14 +13 + 2 #IA + 4 + 3 - S #lB - 2 - 3 -14 #2 + 16 +15 + 4 #2A + 3 + 2 - 9 #2B + 2 + 1 -10 #2C - 2 - 3 -14 #3 + 16 +15 + 4 #3A + 2 + 1 -10 (1) Based on 60 CNEL General Plan criteria (2) Based on 55 Leq(24), EPA criteria (3) Based on 67 LegH, CALTRANS/FHWA criteria Generally, the CNEL and Leq differences are similar and higher than the CALTRANS criteria. The deviation is very high next to the road (Positions #1, #2, and #3). It is significant at Positions 1A, 2A, 3A, and 2B. In examining the data relative to the speech interference issue, the results show the following: (1) For a normal voice in the highest noise hour, one percent (1%) of the time, the levels would reach a range to reduce intelligibility below 29 percent at all sites at Stations other than #1, #2, and #3. (2) For a normal voice, 25 percent of the time intelligibility would be 41 percent to 70 percent depending on the site. Page 13 5.2 FUTURE CONDITIONS The General Plan Traffic Study reports a 1985 traffic count of 4,300 ADT. The February 3, 1989, count for this study was 8,536 ADT. Since 1985, the CNEL levels should have increased by 3 dBA. The actual increase was 4 dBA which is quite consistent. In 1986, the Washington Specific Plan developed a design figure at build -out of 35,000 ADT. This would represent an increase in noise levels of 6 dBA for both the 24-hour and peak hour time periods. The levels at each measurement position would be those given in Table 12. TABLE 12 FUTURE NOISE LEVELS 24-HOUR HIGHEST HOUR POSITION Ll CNEL Leq Ll Leq #1 80 74 70 85 75 #lA 70 64 60 75 65 #lB 64 58 54 69 59 #2 82 76 72 87 77 #2A 69 63 59 76 64 #2B 68 62 58 74 63 #2C 64 58 54 69 59 #3 82 76 72 87 77 #3A 68 62 58 72 64 The deviations from the various standards are given in Table 13 on the following page. Page 14 TABLE 13 COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE LEVELS WITH GOVERNMENT STANDARDS 24-HOUR HIGHEST HOUR POSITION CNEL(1) Leq(2) Leq(3) #1 + 20 +19 + 8 #lA + 10 + 9 - 1 #lB + 4 + 3 - 8 #2 + 22 +21 +10 #2A + 9 + 8 - 3 #2B + 8 + 7 - 4 #2C + 4 + 3 - 8 #3 + 22 +21 +12 #3A + 8 + 7 - 4 (1) Based on 60 CNEL General Plan criteria (2) Based on 55 Leq(24), EPA criteria (3) Based on 67 LegH, CALTRANS/FHWA criteria The deviation from the City's and EPA's Standards will be quite high in the future with the present physical characteristics of the Tract. Conditions are not nearly as severe as measured by the CALTRANS/FHWA Criteria. In terms of speech intelligibility, in the highest hour, the best condition is 41 percent intelligi- bility. The typical case is 29 percent intelligibility and the "worst case" close to zero intelligibility with a normal voice. 5.3 CONCLUSIONS In examining the noise data, from the several points of view, then the following conclusions result: (1) A present noise impact does exist over a large part of the Tract, but it is not especially severe except for the homes adjacent to Washington. Page i5 (2) The future noise levels will produce serious noise impacts throughout the Tract. 6.0 POTENTIAL MITIGATION A sound barrier along Washington is one possible mitiga- tion measure. Such a wall will produce noise reductions throughout: the Tract, but its highest benefit would occur to the residents closest to Washington. A sound barrier placed along Washington does not produce the same effect on the interior of the Tract with the houses in place as it would do a vacant parcel of property. The reason is because the existing houses already act as a sound barrier. Erection of a barrier along Washington could actually :increase sound levels in the interior of the Tract. Consider, for example, two cases. In Case #1, a single barrier is erected between the road and a person. A person stands 150 feet from that barrier. In the Case #2, a double barrier is erected. The second barrier is eight feet high and the first barrier is variable :in height. The second barrier is placed 25 feet closer to the listener. The resulting noise levels at the listener position are given in Table 14, and the calculations are contained in Appendix 6. TABLE 14 NOISE LEVELS AT LISTENER FOR TWO WALL CASES FOR LISTENER AT 200 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROADWAY(1) CASE #1 CASE #2 (2) HEIGHT OF FIRST WALL (1 WALL) (2 WALLS) 0' 85.0 74.5 2' 79.9 71.0 4' 79.0 71.7 8' 76.6 71.9 10, 75.1 75.1 12' 73.8 73.8 14' 72.6 72.6 (1) Level set at 85 dBA at 150' from wall position for illustration. (2) Second wall 8' high. Page 16 Case: The following interesting results occur for the two wall (1) The levels are less than the one wall case up to an eight foot height for the first wall. Then the level jumps and the second wall case does not become less than the one wall case until the first wall exceeds 14 feet. (2) The level for the two wall case is relatively insensitive to the first wall height from 2 to 8 feet. This example illustrates the problem in the Tract. The existing houses compare to the second wall. Placing the first wall next to the roadway could produce little benefit on the interior of the Tract. In fact, it could actually raise the levels once the height exceeds the neight of the nearest houses (typically one story). As a practical matter, it is unlikely walls 14 feet plus are going to be built in order to reduce levels on the interior of the Tract:. For this reason, we can concentrate on the effect of zero to twelve foot walls. The calculations for the actual wall based on the first row of houses are contained in Appendix 7. The results are summarized in Table 15. TABLE 15 REDUCTION IN NOISE LEVEL SOUND WALL AT THE CURB FOR POINT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE TENNIS COURTS (POSITIONS lA OR 2A) REDUCTION HEIGHT PIA 2A P2B P2C 6' 7.3 7.0 6.3 8' 8.9 8.3 7.1 10, 10.4 8.2 8.0 12 11.8 9.3 9.0 The calculated reduction at Position #2B (along Avenita Montero) will not be as great as predicted since there are some ancillary sources of noise off of 50th Street which contribute to the total. The estimated improvement is expected to be about 4 dBA less than predicted, or 2 to 5 dBA, depending on the height. The basic ground rule was to achieve a 5 dBA improvement if any real notice is to be taken of the improvement. However, 0 l6 Page 17 with 5 dBA only, the future increase of traffic noise by 6 dBA would result in a future condition really like the conditions at present. Therefore, it would be advisable to erect the barrier at 10 to 12 feet. The 10 to 12 foot barrier will produce 12 dBA noise reduction on the first lots, 9 dBA halfway into the Tract, and 5 dBA along the south western area of Montero. Unfortunately, Avenita Montero will experience a future condition much like the existing one as traffic volume increases. However, construction of a wall at a long distance from Avenita Montero and the penetration of noise via the entry points limits the effectiveness of mitiga- tion along Washington. Also, at the north end of the Tract, the entrance gate poses a problem. Homes along Avenita Montero for several hundred feet from the gate will receive little benefit from the sound wall unless a way is found to close up the entrance. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions are as follows: (1) The existing noise levels are not a significant impact on the Tract as measured by conventional standards except on the lots adjacent to Washington. (2) Future traffic volumes will rise to 35,000 cars a day from the present 8,800. This represents a 6 dBA increase in noise, or put another way, a 60 percent increase in loudness. (3) At the future traffic volumes, all areas of the Tract will have a significant impact as measured by conventional standards. (4) To achieve a significant noise reduction now, and to provide a reduction on future impacts, a sound barrier should be erected along Washington that is 10 to 12 feet in height. a Page 18 EXHIBIT 1 LAND USE COMPATABILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS LAND USE CATEGORY COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE Ldn OR CNEL, dB 5,5 .s t 75 :s RESIDENTIAL. s SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX, MOBILE.MES �M� %///////.%//////%/////// �Oii"d SCHOOLS, LIBRARIES, CHURCHES, HOSPITALS, NURSING HOMES M=00/0 OEM= SPORTSman s••• • . SPORTS SPECTAT� %////// %///// %///// %//////. %////nnom PLAYGROUNDS, PARKS Ili_®_�■_■_ COURSES,NEIGHBORHOOD GOLF STABLES, WATER RECREATION, sCEMETERIES __-■ OFFICE BUILDINGS,COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL MEN INTERPRETATION NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation requirements. EM CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. NORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. M CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Page 19 X W w..,, MCI; Z aii'�,i LU LU 3Av a Nsn4,e39rs "oo o- 8 c N 9 ° N /io A JJsnne i b 371109 N r..rrc t r - r<oKN37 i ry a. h !. 05 p rri }.J�...rr ^� N V ! V W N B �0 Y mIt ' g' k Amoy s�t, a d' , 3A/NO < oevnovs •F� o Ry ^ . r O'er � �5.p `F o aQ zi o 7b it Y is a%'b PI N' � os a of rc a N�o c a ,yy M1' w�6 ;0/'/M 73 V� Os et• a'' t� �rC.rv� Z m ti 3n/do r Y41 it "r• � M ! Page 20 cr) LU ry :D 0 T 7Iti i. LI j 71- Page 21 I r m Page 22 U) 0) 1- O d O Q m O 2 O Lo J r- CD N m WO O O LoLU 0 CO CD O L O of �i Z p s 'i" eKy i, WI (A U cps P W 2 �1 rt W Z� m to to ' T, r^ b �,. cr N � ' w 4�- .q� it' •+ss M u do i Nsnre ©Q'�.sK' `�� 1i A. • 371108 rµ i a d + 3.1/dC ± 2 \ m 2 s odvnsys m l 1 �^ .O - a z r�4<r s 'M t 4 4 V Q •o -1 4.' ♦� .Q :O/'/N 73 y Z �— t"E� 3.1/80 1 a=�ti , t i s s• 1 h h h i . I�` %. 3�H0 Vd le— Page 23 85 m 75 70 65 8( ;Y EXHIBIT 6 BASIC CURVE L1 SHOWN SUBTRACT 6 FOR CNEL, 10 FOR 24 HR LEO. AND 5 FOR PEAK HOUR LEO O 9 q s c9�ssFc ioN? $ 3 0�, •1A •2A 3A 28 i •2C Y i 50 10 100 1000 DISTANCE FROM CENTERLINE U Page 24 O GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 1 NOISE RATING METHODS Llast Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 • Phone(714)835-0249 Page 25 Page 1 of 3 CORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS N O - - E R A T - N G M E T H O D - The A -weighted decibel of "A" scale on the sound level meter is often used in the measurement of noise because the weighting characteristics of this scale approximate the subjective response of the human ear to a broad frequency band noise source by discriminating against the very low and the very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. Since community noise is seldom constant, varying from moment to moment and throughout the day, the "A" weighted noise level needs to be further described to provide meaningful data. The Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Department of Transportation, foreign countries and private consultants are now using three time -exceeded percentile figures to describe noise, which are: (1) L90 is the noise level which is exceeded 90% of any sample time period (such as 24 hours) and is used to describe the background or ambient noise level. (2) L50 is the noise level which is exceeded 50% of the time. It is the median level. (3) L10 is the noise level which is exceeded 10% of the time and is a good descriptor of fluctuating noise sources, such as vehicular traffic. It indicates the near -maximum levels which occur from grouped single events. Being related to the subjective annoyance to community noise, it is a good design tool 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K 0 Santa Ana, California 92701 0 Phone(714) 835.0249 Page 26 Page 2 of 3 in the planning of acoustical barriers. More recent noise assessment methods are based on the equivalent energy concept where Leq(x) represents the average energy content of a fluctuating noise source over a sample period. The subscript (x) represents the period in which the energy is computed and measured. Current practice references the quantity to either one (1) hour, eight (8) hours, or twenty- four (24) hours. When referenced to one (1) hour, L eq is also sometimes called HNL (Hourly Noise Level). Since Leq is the summation of the functional products of noise level and duration, many combinations of noise level, duration time and time history can make up the same LeQ value. Thus, an Leq(24) equals 50 means only that the average noise level is 50 dB. During the 24-hour period there can be times when the noise level is higher than 50 dB, and times when it is lower. If the period of the measurement is only a single event, the energy content is not averaged. The energy expression for a single event is simply the sum of the functional product of the noise_ level and duration time of the event. This term is called L or SENEL (Single Event Noise Exposure Level). The summation of Le values averaged over one hour is Leq(1)' Leq(8)' and Leq(24), etc. LeQ is further refined into Ldn (Level Day -Night) and CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level), where noises that occur during certain hours of the day are weighted (or penalized) because 'they are considered subjectively more annoying during these time periods: (1) Ldn is the sound level in dBA which corresponds to the average energy content of the noise being measured over a 24-hour period including a 10 dBA weighting penalty for sound levels which occur during the nighttime hours of 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. This is a rating method recommended by the Environmental Paae 27 Page 3 of 3 Protection Agency because it takes into account those subjectively more annoying noise events which occur during the sleeping hours. (2) CNEL is the sound level in dBA which corres- ponds to the average energy content of the noise being measured over a 24-hour period including a five (5) 3BA penalty for noise which occurs during the evening hours of 7:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M., and a ten (10) dBA weighting penalty for noise that occurs during the night- time hours of 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. For typical high- way vehicular traffic situations, computer analysis has shown that CNEL and Ldn correlate within 0.5 dBA. The percentile figures L10, L50' and L90 can be directly scaled from a graphical recording of the measured noise over a particular time period. They are also convenient to implement in automatic measurement equipment. Energy parameters Le, Leq, Ldn, and CNEL require expensive and complicated equip- ment. As a result, engineers have devised ways of estimating Leq (and hence, Ldn) using standard instrumentation and methods. Page 28 O GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 2 1985 MEASUREMENT RESULTS 621 EaStSeventeenthStreet, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 • Phone(714)835-0249 Page 29 TABLE 2-1 HOURLY MEASUREMENT DATA 24 HOUR SITE HOUR Leq- L1- 0000 54.2 68.0 0100 52.6 66.5 0200 50.7 63.2 0300 50.4 64.2 0400 55.1 67.8 0500 63.3 74.3 0600 63.8 73.4 0700 63.8 74.9 0800 63.0 73.9 0900 63.2 73.8 1000 63.1 73.7 1100 63.0 73.9 1200 62.1 74.0 1300 63.1 74.7 1400 62.8 73.2 1500 64.3 75.0 1600 63.8 74.2 1700 63.8 73.7 1800 62.8 73.1 1900 62.0 72.8 2000 61.4 72.6 2100 60.6 71.8 2200 58.5 71.3 2300 56.9 70.2 CNEL = 66.4 411, (Icy) y rage sU L GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 3 1989 24 HOUR MEASUREMENT DATA 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K 0 Santa Ana, Calitornia92701 0 Phone(714) 835 0249 Page 31 Y�G `'4' ..,❑ _ fit.- TLme '1`J ,..I - FAN z�: 1;:7 *lrl _ -. 'J ` i�.. '�4..: '•9.5 :, FFA i .�, �l= .1U h:m ._ FFB - Se:17li (1 "il ,- - rn" Sri - _ FEn 1;)1;.5. 76.5 '-47 44. FEE 14:: _ID :u7 1:(iQ t-d Cu _14. �l 4u.0 FEE iti`5.'97 :011 h:4t it I LL - FEB 1c:59:07 ! •iii.� ;;•ta 0 LO1c_ 74.i 110 = 69.5 L 2 5 = c•6.5 LSn = ''2.= 5 63.0 a9.1) ='.).5 9+4.0 41),=, 2' FEB 17:5:1:17 1:00 h:m 0 0 it L01 = 7'?.0 L10 = 67.5 L25 64.5 i..50 = 9 62.5 96.5 76.0 94.5 37.0 2 FEB 18:59:07 1:00 h:a 0 0 L01 = 72.5 L10 = 67.5 L25 65 5 L50 = c5,_- 10 63.0 98.5 F,2.0 93.0 36.0 2 FEB 19:59:07 1:00 h:ra LIO = E8.0 1 25 - 62.5 1150 = 54.3 11 60.5 96.0 77.0 94.0 37-0 2 FEB 20:59:07 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 L01 = 70.5 L10 = 65.5 L25 = 60.5 L50 = 52.0 12 60.5 96.0 79.0 98.0 34.5 2 FEB 21:59:07 1:00 h:m 0 !) 0 L01 = -I.1) LIO = 65.5 L25 = 59.0 L5i11 = 49-0 13 59.1) 95.0 52.0 94.5 5 .0 2 FEB 22:5'9:07 1:00 h:m 0 0 O L01 = .1. L1O = I...5 L25 = 55.0 L510 = =•C.0 14 56.) 91..5 77.0 92.0 35.0 '2 FEB 23:59:07 1:00 h:m 0 00 LO1 = 53.0 L10 - 59.1) L25 = 51.0 L50 = 46.0 5 54.1) 39.5 74.5 87.5 '_,4.0 3 FEB 0:59:07 1:00 h.:m 0 0 LO1 = E8.5 L11) 53.5 L25 = 46.0 L50 = 42.G 16 52.0 87.5 76.0 .56.0 74.0 '_, FEB 1:59:07 1:00 h:ra 0 0 0 LO1 = 67.0 L11) = 46.5 L25 = 39.0 L50 = =.5.5 17 52.0 87.5 77.1) 96.0 34.0 3 FEB 2:59:07 1:00 h:m 0 0 0 LO1 = 57.5 L10 -: 48.0 L25 = 39.5 L50 = 35.1) 18 54.5 90.5 78.0 91,10 '4. FEE 3:59:07 1:00 h:m 0 i) O L01 = 69.5 LiO = 51.0 L25 = 43,0 LEO = 37.5 1 T, 58.5 94.0 78.0 91.5 35.5 3 FEB 4.59:07 1:00 h:ra 0 0 0 Lill = C.5 Li0 = 61_.5 L25 = 55,0 L50 = 49.0 2() 64.0 '39.5 81.1i 96.5 41.5 3 FEB 5:59:07 1:00 h:m 0 Il 0 L01 = 75.0 LIO = 65.5 L25 = 54.0 L50 = 58.0 21 65.5 101.0 r0.5 95.0 49.5 :3 FEB 6:519:07 1:00 h:m 0 0 O 1 = 74.5 L10 = 69.0 L25 = 66.5 L50 = 62.5 22 65._ 1,01.0 o1.0 106.5 44.0 3 FEE 7:59:07 1:00 h:m 0 ') 0 Li'1 = 75.5 L 1 0 - 69.5 L25 = 66.5 L50 = i_2.6 J 69.0 11)4,5 95.5 111.- 43.5 3 FEB :"a:07 1:00 h:m it 00 Lr1 8.5 LIO = E9.O L25 = 65.0 Lsn = 6u.0 1 24 56-ii 101.5 '=^ 0 ;ii5.5 43.5 3 FEB 9 59:07 1:00 h:m i) U 0 L01 = 76.0 Lii) = 69.5 L25 = 66.0 L50 = :2.0 Page 32 I NYTV IR -F- F� (-' H -F L, T-Z; nt La I n 'D e 7 1 ;iJur Ft FEE L -4. 5 77E i m Li J ti7 .5 Page 33 LARMN-DAV12 LABS -- RMEL IT 0203179 0:22:14 AN 7MUM ,no M EEL Wax L;K _Tin Dan- Time our Hy vp 101 VA An -h: 4 FEE .:0129 : Y5 &M '04 TA.L 01.0 41.0 TA.0 5-.0 FEE 4:12:2T �:0 h:m L, "-- 4&T L. ',U Lit - jK.j "to 115 -0.0 55.0 W.5 Tw.5 11.5 1 FEE 4;17:19 o:05 wo Lul 1i.1 , 10 - �H,5 LI .w L7Y N5 j".4 i.F -1.0 to.4 5'.k 1 FEE 4:22:29 VIT h:m -i,l Liu - G.h L25 = Ts.j - gq L97 -7. � 71.4 RF 01 70, a 04.0 75.v Liu 5 FEB - 0,5 27 : 29 .15 - j vV,T : OF Ho 101 27.0 "9 -7.5 W . 0 5, it 3 FEB 1: 32 : 23 005 h:M 159 51.0 52.4 74.� 05.5 On- 3 FEE 29 �05 h:v u J-01 72. Liu - 59.0 L25 - 47.0 L50 - -1.) 00 24.1i 71M 74.5 67.0 14.5 3 FEE 4:41:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 Lal 71. Liu - 43.5 L:5 = 44. n L50 - .'l 201 43.5 W.D bl.o 72.5 34.5 1 FEB 4:47:29 0:05 h:m u 0 f) LGI 60.0 L10 = 39.5 L25 = 37.5 L50 - 35.0 202 45.5 70.0 54.5 79.0 34,5 3 FES 4: 52: 29 0:05 h:m 0 u 1 LUI - 02.0 W = 19.5 L25 - 37.0 L50 = 560 203 62.5 27.0 79.5 92.0 W.0 3 FEE 4:57:29 0:05 Min 0 u o LQI - 77.5 Lio - r2n L25 = 50.0 L50 - 44,0 104 49.9 74.0 67.5 00.0 35.0 3 FEE 5:02:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 L01 - 65.0 LOA - 44.0 L25 - 4M Low - Nx 205 19w U.0 69.0 80.0 14.5 3 FEB 5:07:29 0:01 Win 0 0 j L& - 56.5 LIO = 57.5 L25 - 0.0 L50 = 35A, 206 58.5 81.5 75.0 S6.5 14.5 3 FEB 5:12:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 LOI = 75.5 LIO - 51A L25 = ahn L50 - 13.� 107 a9.5 74.0 66.0 77.5 14.5 3 FEE 5:17:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 01-01 - 65.0 LIO = 53 L25 = 57.0 LSD - 15Z, 205 55.0 80.0 73.0 87.0 54.5 3 FEE 5:22:29 0:05 Win U u I 1,01 = 71.5 WO = 49.0 L25 = 42.5 L50 = 17.5 209 36,0 51,0 41,5 53,0 34.1 3 FEB 5:27:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 o LOI = 4w.5 LIC , 38.5 L25 = 15.5 �50 = 35.�! 210 52.0 77.0 70.5 86.0 35.0 5 FEB 5:32:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 LCI - 68.0 W 1 46.5 L25 = 0.5 L50 = 53.� Oil 59.6 53.5 77.5 28.5 35.0 5 FEE 5:37:20 U:05 h:m 0 0 L01 - 4.0 1-0 = 50.0 L25 = Va L50 = 15.j 02 37.0 62.0 4M 54,0 75.5 3 FEB 5:42:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 ) L&I - 43.0 Liu = 56.0 L25 = 57.5 L50 = 10.5 215 19.0 13.5 71.0 69.0 16.0 3 FEE 5:47:20 005 h:m a 0 0 UWI - 74.5 LIG - 61.5 L25 = 52.0 LTU - 99 13171 Page 35 INTV RE E.: F-' F-, -F 7- .5 It FEE 42 h: L25 fll 5 L 1� 5 :37 "2. 2. 5 FEE 47 S9 Ci :i5 h: m U L C, D C, L2-1 I 54 53 5:3. 0 Ta S FEB z, `�2 : '29 cl L (" 1 5 L i H, u L 2, 5 = 57 5 L 155 5F, c1.0 70.i) 85.0 36.0 3 FEB 5 2 9 05 h- 6.3.51 L10 = 60.5 . 5 L25 = 5u L I S5 57. 21 5 69 81 5 3�-- 3 FEB 1 Z : -29 J- 05 h; in 0 !S-, 716 gn.5 731. U 86.5 '.Fj 3 FEB I f)7 29 1 05 D J ;j L 01 1 5 f7 5 f, 0 37.5 5.5 FEB 1 12 20, S L 10. 5 -125 = 40 11 L I L) (J 1 SO bit z-, 5 5, 81.0 93.5 =,F. 0 FEB i 17: 29 f.; ,S ri: m L 1', 1 = '77. 5 I'l 1-27 46 0 41.2 150 49.5 74.5 65.5 P5 I . IL) 36.0 3 FEB 1 22: 29 j) 5 h m Lol 63.5 L I L 25 = 47. LIII 4) I Gl 5,f 1) 76.0 71.5 32.0 36.5 3 FEB 1 27 : 29 111 OS " 0 LOI = 700 L L 2 5 = 42.0 LC; - -9 62 53.5 78.5 71.0 5 �5.5 FEB 1 3 2 : 2C9 0 05 h: 0 Lol = 55 _1 = 45,5 L25) 163 56 "0 5 71 .-12. 5 FEB I �7 2'j 6 115 lri : m 0 t 0S8.0L L T1 . �� L 2, 14. 1 �i) 1 E.-, 51 I FEB 1 4 2 t�1) ", h: C, Lul �,7. o 1, 10 44--, -;2 5. -16, L', 36 rI :3 '7-. 5 5-5 0 FEB 1 4" : 2,13 �j 5 _n: L 1 6,U L 2S = 5f. r L S 0 = 42 166 1 1) -2 e, . 0 F 7- B i 5 2 : 2,1-, 215 h: m Lit 69 Li,' 3-1 U FEB i 57 L25 ij 1 i, 5 87.0 97Cl 3 FEB 2) 1) 2 : 20 5 1 71 L i C = 47.0 L25 L 0 Page 36 1 N7v pG IJ E 2 FEE -L:"7:29 15 n 22: 7 1 J: J 1 56. 7 o 21 FEE? 2: 2: 9 9:f h: rz, i) ri 9 -4.5 FEB 47:29 0:05 1-,: m 0 f) i: 2.`_. -- 7. 7 Cl 43.0 2 FEB �12:'2:29 zl):O�� h:m 1; ;i � 7,7 LIO = 66. S L '- 5 - 52. L 5 "1 1 0 137. 5 5 9ii.0 42.5 2 FEB 22:57:29 h:m 0 0 0, Lill = L 11) = 68, .5 L25 - C, L S;., 51. 2, -.5.0 -'+ 1 0 2 FEB 2 2 2 9 C, f) S 1-.: J '5 4-. 71 0 3, F) 41. 5 2 FEB 2�: 7, '213 :05 h: i,% '4 13 -1 '0.0 94.0 42.0 FEE 3: 1 29 0 0 5 h: m 0 0 "8. o Lil C,-:,, - t) 1 5 = 65.0 L fj '5,�, ij "5 79 84.5 70. 5 (5 3 . 0 4. FEB 17: (1: jj5 11: M 0 0, -Ul = E,9. 5 Lin = 65.5 5 L 1 6 64.0 88.5 79.5 92.5 43.0 2 FEB _'3:22 29 h, 0 Cl L01 = 75.0 L10 = 69 L 62.0 - 7 =,'Z 5 57.0 76.0 90.0 41.5 2 FEB 23:27:29 U: h: LOI = 73.5 Lin = 67.5 35 L50 i35 Gl D 35.5 73.5 90.5 4 i FEB 123 : 32 9 o: 05 h:m iJ LIO = 6. L2` = �8rj L 5 41.i1 2 FEB 7: 29 0 : fJ5 h:m (I C) f) 0 r,7.2 GO.o cl 0 2 FEB 2 3: 42 : SO 0:05 h:m i) 0 t) 15 L 10 = 67.0 L25 = 60.0 LSf- 1 4 Z-1 I FEB 2 -1 -:47:29 0: i,5 I h: m 0 "I j l'l F, 6 . 5 L25 -4.'- L _0 j FEB 3 2:" t C) h:m 7 1 7 FEE Liu 7 41,.5 FEB J L" 2 29 1): (15 h: m Ij I L;il 71 . 1) 1 Lllj = 6 1 . .25 - 5i.Q 7, `10 = Page 37 SNT`J 1�E.�rr_�R.T cL _ L ..1 FEE i .42:29 `.i!_, h:;n «!.' FEE ^;47:29 L2L, yJL 2 FEB -`v5 LC!1 = 74.11 10 G .5 99. �z°.5 FEB 20:57:2Q 0:05 h:rn p 0 u Lull = ?S. it LiU =.i' :'_5 =tit. L7i1 = 5_'.0 5k.!1 5 '7.0 90. 5 _ FEB 1 02'2J J5 h:m 0 9 .� „p,` �,.� 74 . = 2 FEB 1.-11 ry9 :05 h:m 0 0 0 _'.. ..0 �1.- 84.-: .1.;.` .-_ FEE --I 1:.. 23 c:05 h:m 'a L0i = 31,G ..!':! - C!9. .._ 1 = D4.l1 2 FEB <:1 : 17 2-0u9 : 1)5 h:;n p rl { I_. 01 = 73,0 L 1 C1 t._.,. :. S _.i% L:VJ 86.5 7-.5 a0.i1 42.5 FEB 21: 29 0:0❑ h:m i. L01 = 72.0 ... 11: ==:7,i1 L 5 52.F NJ.0 75.0 88.0 42,U 2 FEB '21:I. 0:05 h:m r 0 LO1 = 74.11 10 = ti%I. it L'25 = 3. __, 11 = _ 114 E3.0 37.5 79.5 94.0 42.0 2 FEE 21:32:29 O:05 h:�L 0 0 � LU1 = 7" 0 L,iJ _ L25 = ':0.11 5U = 51.0 1 15 C 0 . _ 85. 5 71 .5 -7 9_ 42. (1 2 FEB `S'_ • 37 :'20 1? : 05 rd rrt �i 0 n 11L' 5 2 FEB 2.:42:2: u:li=1 h:rr, li 9 37,_ 42. L FEE 21:47:<3 i!:i15 n:m 0 i9 LI'. - -'4.0 Lit_ - C3._ ..,°. _.. = 4=..� _ FEE ._1 S2 c+ O:ilS h:7, i! i; p 2.11 :7.1 = 41. 2 FEE 21.57:29 O:i15 h:m _2i1 t';1.4 5.5. 71 S �4. I- -EH `' tt,.29 0:.15 Lf1 .,._ „I, 76.0 135 54.r L5U - 4-.0 �' Page 38 I" N Y V R H cj le IT' ORSON-DAM ABO NQUEL 70, Owl 19 10:17:50 M NOBUT42 FAKE it i�L -FL Lmax Lpk Lain Date Time R., ph -0.2 95.5 AaA 19.0 Q.5 FEB 29 LN - 62.� LIA 70.a L25 = 80.1 51.n -0.0 2 FEB 1RA2:21 )M h:m 1 71 W.% 13.1 77 5 14,Y 45.5 1 FEE 11:17:22 WK h:m 0 32 5 05.5 52.0 15.5 46.1 FEB 1022:22 �:05 h:m j 0 Lai - 79.5 An 77A L25 - W.? 140 - 13.0 70.0 W." 07.5 Z FEE if:27:29 0:05 Vw 0 1,01 - -0.5 -13 = 72.0 L25 - 02.5 LA = 06. TC 02.5 50.5 75.0 W.2 46.3 Z FEE 10:32:29 0:03 h:m 0 1 S11 = 14.5 Liu 7n." 125 - 57., Lon VIA 0 GO,! 77. 0 R9 - 5 47.5 FEB I S: 37 : 29 0:05 h:m A 0 0 L& = 71.5 L 10 = 70.0 L25 = 67.0 L50 = Ow 66.0 11A QUA 95.0 44.5 Z FEB 15:42:29 Muz h:m 0 0 i) Lui - 75.5 LIO - 69.5 L25 = 17.5 L59 - 02.5 31 56.1 J1.0 76.5 90.0 44.5 Z FEE 18:47:29 0:05 h:m 0 Q 0 Lol = 75.0 LIQ = 71.0 L25 = 67,5 L50 = 61A 5Z W.5 D2.0 76.5 68.5 43.0 2 FEB 18:52;20 0:05 h:m 0 0 U LA = 76.0 LIO = 72.0 L25 = 68.5 L50 = 85.0 85 65.0 19.5 78.5 91.0 a3.0 2 FEB 15:57:29 0:05 Mm 0 0 o Lill = 75.5 WO = 59.0 L25 = 66.0 L50 = 50.a, 24 54.0 29.0 74.5 07.0 43.5 2 FEB 19:02:29 0:05 h:m it 0 U Lill = 72.5 LIO = 69.0 L25 = 65.0 L50 - 60.0 55 61.5 90.0 74.5 85.5 45.5 2 FEB 19:07:29 0:05 h:m C 0 �) Lul = 73.5 LIU = 70.0 L25 = 56.5 L50 = blAl An 16.5 91.5 76.0 87.5 46.5 2 FEB 19:12:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 0 Lill - 74.5 Liu - 11.5 L25 = 68.6 L50 - 62A 07 56.0 01.0 77.5 89.0 44.0 2 FEB 19:17:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 L01 = 75.5 110 = 70.5 L25 - 67.5 L50 , 88 65.5 00.5 79.5 91.0 44.0 2 FEE 19:22:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 LOI = 70.5 LIC - 69.0 L25 - 56.0 L50 , on!) 59 55.5 90.0 76.5 88.0 -3.0 2 FEB 19:27:29 0:05 Win 0 0 M = 74.5 WO = 70.0 L25 = 66.5 L50 = 61.0 00 53.5 80.0 75.5 W.5 43.5 2 FEB 19:52:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 Ci LAI = 72.5 LIO = 62.5 L25 = 64.0 L50 = 57.,, 91 65.5 90.0 75.5 NN 47.5 2 FEB 13:37:29 0:05 hn 0 A I) LOI = 12.5 Al - 70.0 L25- 67.5 L50 = 51.5 92 64.5 39.0 76.0 90A 45.0 2 FEB i9:42:29 0:05 h:m 0 5 0 L01 - 71.5 LIU - 18.5 L15 = E5.0 L50 = "Q.,j W 55.0 J1.0 15.5 39.0 44.5 2 FEB 19:47:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 p Lol = 75.0 LIO = 71.5 L25 = 17.0 L50 = 60.-, 94 64.5 29.5 73.0 09.0 44,0 2 FEB 19:52:29 0:05 h:m 0 0 6 Al = WA LIO = 09.0 L25 = 67.w L50 = 62A At 85,5 2.1 51,5 92.0 42.0 Z FEB M57:29 0:05 h:m S o 0 LOI = 75.2 AO = 70.5 =5 - 66.0 L50 ---"D . 5 96 65.5 35.0 76.0 90.0 42.0 2 FEB 20:02:20 0:05 hn 0 0 0 Lai = 72.4 LIU = RAS LA - 61.4 TH 00 �, Page 39 WEE j-. L U -,4. ED F7. 2 7 FEE 16 4'-.-' 29 h: Lul i if 1 .5 LZI., 9 'n U L,7 .5 46 . 5 2) FEB F,:47:2��, h: "Cl j 0 L 5( C,= 6' - 717 iD �9. 4�� 5 2 FEB I �2: 29 J5 h: LUI 0 L. 1 1) 1 6 . '31 0 0 DO . 0 44.0 FEB 16 29 Ci5 I 77.5 L 10 = '70. 5 L2", = C,7. LSO = 6(: . _2._ 70. C '31 . 5 44. " 2 FEB i 7: f) -7 20 0 5 j%: m a t) -: :1 = 76.0 L I,,', = " 1 . L-75 > '9. 5 LSi' 75.0 -,0.5 46.0 2 FEE 17: C -1': 29 Cil h: if '32.3 45.5 FEB 17: 2, 9 f" 0 h: m 0 0 Lill = 7c.n - .5 "IZ - I - - - � T-I 6. 01 '31 . 0 46. 0 2 FEB 117:17:29 ; :05 j h, : 'm 9 "j I Lill = 75.i) L I U = 71.5 L25 = 63. ci L Sv = 6-�. E14 6,3.5 93.5 32.0 94.5 1 44.5 2 FEB 17: 22: :9 - :oS 'r,: rj� C.) n LOI - 81 L 10 - 72. 5 �2S = 69, Fj7 . f) 92.0 78.5 91.i 44. 1' FEB I 1' �7: - J: 01 17� C, L 1 1; i72,i1 = . 1 -1 CI.5. J 1-50 0 66 66.0 91.0 77.0 91).5 45,5 2 FEB i 7: J2: 2-0 0: 05 h: in 0 LOI 73.5 LiD = 71.1) :"-5 L-r C, 92 47.i ^ FEB if LO 1 = 77. -'1 L 0 = 70.5 2 oc. 5 L5u b,-, . E -D 64, -"J .5 .0 5;:1. 1) -''7 � 2 FEB i-, :42:29 1,: uS r,: m C, L, I F16. 5 L 50 0 51.0 94, 0 4E. 0 2 FEE 7 4 7: 29 ;,: 05 h:m j 1 = 77 1 (,if 7 1.5 L25 = 68.5 L 5 1 :!)5 th m L) 1=?.5 Liu L25 --.5 0 Q y5.5 -;J. 5 2 FEB i. 7 7 L 1 31 70 . 1-25 = 53,0 �4. f) 3.0 94.(1 S FEB 13: 02: 29 1; Cl' h: m 7�1 Page 40 L m s t j FEE Etl 4 it F EE L L 25 4-1 Z, L 4 '_4.._ 5 64.5 4 2 FEB 4 2 2'D ..I,l 72. 1) LSii = C J . 5 6�. 1 30 5 1) 21,2 . 1 4 0 2 FEE 47 2- h: 1. 77. L I C, 65. L) D4 - _2 , 0 -,- 108. 5 42. 02 FEB 14: 52: 23 05 h I) 55,5 Lin = 70.5 L_`i C, 66.0 0 60.0 '94. 43. 5 2, FEE 14: t7 : 29 5 11 Tc, p j 127 = E5. S lz7 S 9 2 0 5 90.5 42.5 2 FEB 15: 0 -,: 19 r r- h: 1, Eul 1 1) - ?2. C! L2_�. 5 L 92.5 82.0 93.0 46.5 2 FEE I ) 7 : 29 uS m j it j L U 1 -,9 . L 1. J, = 7n1 1.25 - 42.0 2 FEB 5 12 9 05 h: m j LIO = 70.0 L25 - 66.0 1, 5 1) cl 39 5 91 .0 311 - U 90.5 FEB 15 17 : 20 l) : 11 5 J-1: m j 0 i) 1, 0 1 = 77.5 L 1,j = 70.5 L25 -- 66.5 L ��,D . f', 40 65.0 90.0 78.0 93.0 42. FEB 15 22: 29 In : m 1) 0 Ci LOI 0 i 0 7 u . 1 L LF, = 3E,, L,�, j-) 41 55.5 90.5 77.0 90.0 4 FEE I. S 7 : 2 9 :05 :m ii I) LOI = 74.5 L i 1) U J, L25 0 t) F I 421 65.5 90.5 76.1) 87 41 . S 2 FEB 1 3, 2 : 29 0 : 1.15 h: m C1 I) it L I) = 75. t 0 = 7u.0 L2° = 67.0 L50 4 1 . L) 79.0 9 2 . 5 41.5 2 FEB 15:37:29 6 05 h j o 7 44 -5 . 5 1, 82.1) 96.5 421 . 1) 2 FEB 15: 42: 29 6 j5 'I-,: m fj "i it , I Lill 11 -, = 7 tj . u 1 1 (.l .1 = i ! - ) 1 �_ : � = 59 1 T_ 5 !-1 5 2 �j 4-. 57.1) Q I . -6 5 54.0 2 FEB 15: 47: -11.) 05 h: m 9 0 0 71.5 LLB 5 Lsp 4c 53.5 2 FEB : 2", 5 h, 0 u T -� L E7. 92.5 = 1 Ja. t.1 47 FEE 0: 05 h: Cl I 7F'. ` L 110 '71 I ­� E_, 5 . f 9C, 5 S'. 5 44.1} 12 FEE 1 t 2 2 9 Oz� h: I . t ! j 9 Page 41 I N-r", R F- E' C-) a -I' L ;i EICIN 71 r! o L FES hJ FEE FEE h: 7,5 91. 2 F E L 1 j :.7 J2. J -4. j 2 FEB 12: 42 29 i)5 I E7, ij I 31.5 32.5 43 FEB i.,47 29 0 0", h: m 0 Lyl 79,0 0 69 . 5 '-25 ml _-r6 0 90.5 9 - t 90.5 45.0 2 FEB 1 2 52 : 29 l) 05 h Lill 77 `i L i Q = E19 L25 = sl=) E L 0 61. 11 CI 71 1 3.5 40.5. 2 FEB 12 57 -29 0 5 h 91.5 7F0 66.0 4 21 5 21 FEB 13 2 29 0 0 5 h Lill L. 71.0 z5 2 7EE 113 7 2 9 -j i 5 L 2 67.0 7 'j 5 �2. U 2 FEB i 3: 12: 1 5 1 76.5 L 1 -- 70 L50 7?.0 9 0 -•3 FEB i7: 29 i.05 L u i 76. L10 39.0 L 5 j 5 C 16 67.0 91.5 78.5 91.0 42.5 2 FEB 1 22 29 C, 5 LiJI = 77.0 Lill = "I. (I L= I - . 17 66.0 91.0 76.0 95.0 54.5 2 FEB 13 27 29 0 h m L01 = 74.5 T_ I U ''1.0 iL 1;--, = !1 . 7.i L 1 F, 56.0 91.0 77.5 93.0 54.5 Z FEB 1 3 Z 2 9 o :oc h: L, u I 12_ - 66,5 17 0w - IfO . "I 75.5 57.0 44.0 '2 FEB 1 7 : 29 `J IJ5 h: LOI L 1 0 69 . 0 L21� 5 L'O 20 0 79-0 45.0 FEB J 42 29 h m J 5 9i.5 5 92 . 44. Z FEB 1 47 29 05 L -- 5 5 L5o tj 47.5 2 FEB 5 2 Ila 1) L 34. FEB -,9 0 i i'j i,1t1 - 711 Ll5, 07 92. 79 90.5 5 0 2 FEB 14 112 2, C-1 u .I c, Page 42 O GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 4 1989 TRAFFIC COUNTS 621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K 0 Santa Ana, California92701 0 Phone(714)835-0249 TRAFFIC DATA SERVICESPage 43, INC. MACHINE COUNT DATA et*fswf.�y�yyyes. LOCATION - WASHINGTON ST-100' S/0 SAGUARO AVERAGED VOLUMES FOR - 2/2/89 TO 2/3/89 .+.wxrtxf vv, AM TIME TOTAL TIME FM TOTAL 12:DO - 12:15 20 - 20 12:00 - 12:15 157 - 157 12:15 - 12:30 10 - 10 12:15 - 12:30 118 - 118 12:30 - 12:45 7 - 7 12:30 - 12:45 139 - 139 12:45 - 1:00 13 50 - - 13 50 12:45 - 1:00 138 552 - - 138 552 1:00 - 1:15 12 - 12 1:00 - 1:15 148 - 148 1:15 - 1:30 5 - 5 1:15 - 1:30 130 - 130 1:30 - 1:45 8 - 8 1:30 - 1:45 138 - 138 1:45 - 2:00 8 33 - - 8 33 1:45 - 2:00 143 559 - - 143 559 2:00 - 2:15 3 - 3 2:00 - 2:15 140 - 140 2:15 - 2:30 6 - 6 2:15 - 2:30 138 - 138 2:30 - 2:45 1 - 1 2:30 - 2:45 167 - 167 2:45 - 3:00 2 12 - - 2 12 2:45 - 3:00 188 633 - - 188 633 3:00 - 3:15 2 - 2 3:00 - 3:15 175 - 175 3:15 - 3:30 0 - 0 3:15 - 3:30 189 - 189 3:30 - 3:45 9 - 9 3:30 - 3:45 191 - 191 3:45 - 4:00 3 14 - - 3 14 3:45 - 4:00 199 754 - - 199 754 4:00 - 4:15 6 - 6 4:00 - 4:15 178 - 178 4:15 - 4:30 4 - 4 4:15 - 4:30 167 - 167 4:30 - 4:45 4 - 4 4:30 - 4:45 139 - 139 4:45 - 5:00 7 21 - - 7 21 4:45 - 5:00 162 646 - - 162 646 5:00 - 5:15 6 - 6 5:00 - 5:15 192 - 192 5:15 - 5:30 19 - 19 5:15 - 5:30 195 - 195 5:30 - 5:45 27 - 27 5:30 - 5:45 164 - 164 5:45 - 6:00 36 88 - - 36 88 5:45 - 6.00 145 696 - - 145 696 6:00 - 6:15 45 - 45 6:00 - 6:15 119 - 119 6:15 - 6:30 71 - 71 6:15 - 6:30 128 - 128 6:30 - 6:45 95 - 95 6:30 - 6:45 109 - 109 6:45 - 7:00 125 336 - - 125 336 6:45 - 7:00 102 458 - - 102 458 7:00 - 7:15 107 - 107 7:00 - 7:15 88 - 88 7:15 - 7:30 130 - 130 7:15 - 7:30 83 - 83 7:30 - 7:45 196 - 196 7:30 - 7:45 53 - 53 7:45 - 8:00 178 611 - - 178 fill 7:45 - 8:00 68 292 - - 68 292 8:00 - 8:15 152 - 152 8:00 - 8:15 60 - 60 8:15 - 8:30 158 - 158 8:15 - 8:30 52 - 52 8:30 - 8:45 146 - 146 8:30 - 8:45 43 - 43 8:45 - 9.00 152 608 - - 152 608 8:45 - 9:00 61 216 - - 61 216 9:00 - 9:15 136 - 136 9:00 - 9:15 41 - 41 9:15 - 9:30 129 - 129 9:15 - 9:30 45 - 45 9:30 - 9:45 112 - 112 9:30 - 9:45 40 - 40 9:45 - 10:00 136 513 - - 136 513 9:45 - 10:00 44 170 - - 44 170 10:00 - 10:15 119 - 119 10:00 - 10:15 31 - 31 10:15 - 10:30 121 - 121 10:15 - 10:30 41 - 41 10*30 - 10:45 129 - 129 10:30 - 10:45 34 - 34 10:45 - 11:00 146 515 - - 146 515 10.45 - 11:00 30 136 - - 30 136 11:00 - 11:15 147 - 147 11:00 - 11:15 21 - 21 11:15 - 11:30 143 - 143 11:15 - 11:30 28 - 28 11:30 - 11:45 162 - 162 11:30 - 11:45 15 - 15 11:45 - mmtfter»�»rM 12:00 129 581 - - 129 581 11:45 - 12:00 18 82 - - 18 82 TOTALS 3,382 - 3,382 d y U 11 5,194 - 5,194 ADT'S 8.576 - 8,576 Page 44 TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES„ INC. MACHINE COUNT DATA LOCATION - WASHINGTON ST-100' S/O SAGUARO DATA PRINTOUT FOR - 2/ 3/89 AM TIME TOTAL TIME PM TOTAL »***yc:�*+►h+f*►Mtf� 12:00 - 12:15 20 - 20 12:00 - 12:15 - - 12:15 - 12:30 10 - 10 12:15 - 12:30 - - 12:30 - 12:45 7 - 7 12:30 - 12:45 - 12:45 - 1:00 13 50 - - 13 50 12:45 - 1:00 - 1:00 - 1:15 12 - 12 1:00 - 1:15 - 1:15 - 1:30 5 - 5 1:15 - 1:30 - - 1:30 - 1:45 8 - 8 1:30 - 1:45 - 1:45 - 2:00 8 33 - - 8 33 1:45 - 2:00 - 2:00 - 2:15 3 - 3 2:00 - 2:15 - 2:15 - 2:30 6 - 6 2:15 - 2:30 - - - 2:30 - 2:45 1 - 1 2:30 - 2:45 - - - 2:45 - 3:00 2 12 - - 2 12 2:45 - 3:00 - 3:00 - 3:15 2 - 2 3:00 - 3:15 - 3:15 - 3:30 0 - 0 3:15 - 3:30 - - 3:30 - 3:45 9 - 9 3:30 - 3:45 - 3:45 - 4:00 3 14 - - 3 14 3:45 - 4:00 - 4:00 - 4:15 6 - 6 4:00 - 4:15 - 4:15 - 4:30 4 - 4 4:15 - 4:30 - - - 4:30 - 4:45 4 - 4 4:30 - 4:45 - 4:45 - 5:00 7 21 - - 7 21 4:45 - 5:00 - 5:00 - 5:15 6 - 6 5:00 - 5:15 - - - 5:15 - 5:30 19 - 19 5:15 - 5:30 - 5:30 - 5:45 27 - 27 5:30 - 5:45 - - - 5:45 - 6:00 36 88 - - 36 88 5:45 - 6:00 - - - 6:00 - 6:15 45 - 45 6:00 - 6:15 - - - 6:15 - 6:30 71 - 71 6:15 - 6:30 - - - 6:30 - 6:45 95 - 95 6:30 - 6:45 - - - 6:45 - 7:00 125 336 - - 125 336 6:45 - 7:00 - - - 7:00 - 7:15 107 - 107 7:00 - 7:15 - - - 7:15 - 7:30 130 - 130 7:15 - 7:30 - - - 7:30 - 7:45 196 - 196 7:30 - 7:45 - - - 7:45 - 8:00 178 fill - - 178 611 7:45 - 8:00 - - - 8:00 - 8:15 152 - 152 8:00 - 8:15 - - - 8:15 - 8:30 158 - 158 8:15 - 8:30 - - - 8:30 - 8:45 146 - 146 8:30 - 8:45 - - - 8:45 - 9:00 152 608 - - 152 608 8:45 - 9:00 - - - - - - 9:00 - 9:15 136 - 136 9:00 - 9:15 - - - 9:15 - 9:30 129 - 129 9:15 - 9:30 - - - 9:30 - 9:45 112 - 112 9:30 - 9:45 - - - 9:45 - 10:00 136 513 - - 136 513 9:45 - 10:00 - - - 10:00 - 10:15 119 - 119 10:00 - 10:15 - - - 10:15 - 10:30 121 - 121 10:15 - 10:30 - - - 10:30 - 10:45 129 - 129 10:30 - 10:45 - - - 10:45 - 11:00 146 515 - - 146 515 10:45 - 11:00 - - - - - - 11:00 - 11:15 147 - 147 11:00 - 11:15 - - - 11:15 - 11:30 143 - 143 11:15 - 11:30 - - - 11:30 - 11:45 162 - 162 11:30 - 11:45 - - - 11:45 - *+*+****rxr**+,�**»►*« 12:00 129 581 - - 129 581 11:45 - 12:00 - - - - - - TOTALS 3,382 - 3,382 ADT'S 3,382 - 3,382 Page 45 TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. MACHINE COUNT DATA LOCATION - WASHINGTON ST-100' S/O SAGUARO DATA PRINTOUT FOR - 2/ 2/89 ..:.x.�....•+.+..rr....�• AM . TIME TOTAL TIME PM TOTAL 12:00 - 12:15 - - - 12:00 - 12:15 157 - 157 12:15 - 12:30 - - - 12:15 - 12:30 118 - 118 12:30 - 12:45 - - - 12:30 - 12:45 139 - 139 12:45 - 1:00 - - - - - - 12:45 - 1:00 138 552 - - 138 552 1:00 - 1:15 - - - 1:00 - 1:15 148 - 148 1:15 - 1:30 - - - 1:15 - 1:30 130 - 130 1:30 - 1:45 - - - 1:30 - 1:45 138 - 138 1:45 - 2:00 - - - - - - 1:45 - 2:00 143 559 - - 143 559 2:00 - 2:15 - - - 2:00 - 2:15 140 - 140 2:15 - 2:30 - - - 2:15 - 2:30 138 - 138 2:30 - 2:45 - - - 2:30 - 2:45 167 - 167 2:45 - 3:00 - - - - - - 2:45 - 3:00 188 633 - - 188 633 3:00 - 3:15 - - - 3:00 - 3:15 175 - 175 3:15 - 3:30 - - - 3:15 - 3:30 189 - 189 3:30 - 3:45 - - - 3:30 - 3:45 191 - 191 3:45 - 4:00 - - - - - - 3:45 - 4:00 199 754 - - 199 754 4:00 - 4:15 - - - 4:00 - 4:15 178 - 178 4:15 - 4:30 - - - 4:15 - 4:30 167 - 167 4:30 - 4:45 - - - 4:30 - 4:45 139 - 139 4:45 - 5:00 - - - - - - 4:45 - 5:00 162 646 - - 162 646 5:00 - 5:15 - - - 5:00 - 5:15 192 - 192 5:15 - 5:30 - - - 5:15 - 5:30 195 - 195 5:30 - 5:45 - - - 5:30 - 5:45 164 - 164 5:45 - 6:00 - - - - - - 5:45 - 6:00 145 696 - - 145 696 6:00 - 6:15 - - - 6:00 - 6:15 119 - 119 6:15 - 6:30 - - - 6:15 - 6:30 12B - 128 6:30 - 6:45 - - - 6:30 - 6:45 109 - 109 6:45 - 7:00 - - - - - - 6:45 - 7:00 102 458 - - 102 458 7:00 - 7:15 - - - 7:00 - 7:15 88 - 88 7:15 - 7:30 - - - 7:15 - 7:30 83 - 83 7:30 - 7:45 - - - 7:30 - 7:45 53 - 53 7:45 - 8:00 - - - - - - 7:45 - 8:00 68 292 - - 68 292 8:00 - 8:15 - - - 8:00 - 8:15 60 - 60 8:15 - 8:30 - - - 8:15 - 8:30 52 - 52 8:30 - 8:45 - - - 8:30 - 8:45 43 - 43 8:45 - 9:00 - - - - - - 8:45 - 9:00 61 216 - - 61 216 9:00 - 9:15 - - - 9:00 - 9:15 41 - 41 9:15 - 9:30 - - - 9:15 - 9:30 45 - 45 9:30 - 9:45 - - - 9:30 - 9:45 40 - 40 9:45 - 10:00 - - - - - - 9:45 - 10:00 44 170 - - 44 170 10:00 - 10:15 - - - 10:00 - 10:15 31 - 31 10:15 - 10:30 - - - 10:15 - 10.30 41 - 41 10:30 - 10:45 - - - 10:30 - 10:45 34 - 34 10:45 - 11:00 - - - - - - 10:45 - 11:00 30 136 - - 30 136 11:00 - 11:15 - - - 11:00 - 11:15 21 - 21 11:15 - 11:30 - - - 11:15 - 11:30 28 - 28 11:30 - 11:45 - - - 11:30 - 11:45 15 - 15 11:45 - 12:00 - - - - - - 11:45 - 12:00 18 82 - - 18 82 TOTALS - - - 5,194 - 5,194 ADT'S 5,194 - 5,194 Page 46 L07GORDON BRICKEN &ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 5 MEASUREMENT CHARTS 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K 0 Santa Ana, California92701 0 Phone(71 4)835-0249 A A b CA N N < 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O H O b Y A O IN 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I�III ,y-o-.. III Y II' !II a li r 'II II � I O I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 I A O H O b m O m i I I I O l� i I l: !III' it I I I I III !III I it i'I I ii III Jill I ! III ' I I I I I I I I� I i I I I'! ICI III I I III i V II Ic � II II o I I II II I I I �I I �I �I II o °o I b o a m O Pacxe 4A !a G m p O 0 O O 1► O O O O 0 O f O 0 O m P. O O m �p O O Y L 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I T I I i I I i Ili IIII I II�.�I II TIn III i I. IIII ' i I I II I ��I III I I II IIII' I jll II a i l II� I II II I J I II, Y W IIII I I I I-4- I _IL I IIII co i W O W I II a. z In O Ir I I I I I Itz�I a I C I I II N I I N Q I I W I I i p OD i I I I I I I If 1 O W O m O ^ O m O 10 O O O O O P O O O �O b m O m p E� o W W a z m 0 r r S < < U = 0 U J m m N N < W W J r < < U 0 eo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ao r, co io Y i i i II!!lilillllii'III��I'!ii O O O O m 0 N O O oo 1Uq Page 50 W 0] p p O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 ID A CD tO V 4 { I III Y iT l I III F� co 1. O III LOP- r+-rr l ill Ill; I! I!I�I Ili I! o I I I II I i' w ! w IL z it ' III I II I I �I l ll III II I �! II as N � O OD l li II i IiI AvII' III' W-117 < ci III ! ICI !i II I�II p 03 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I O' O O O O O O O O O O O a • N m 10 `f O OD n m LO < m OD p p I Page 51 d t�Ilh:� .I C `a to Page 52 iD C m O O O 0 40 O h O O 10 O O O Y 0 O m P. O O m 10 O O 10 t III it I. I �I� I illll i l I t I I I II � III I I I I I i I I I 11 it I II I ills i* I 1 I i i Q o < W = I m III III II III 6 F � I I a I W O 11 z w j II ¢ < ill II = II II. G I I'Ii I c� � II liZIXII III I II I. i 1� I li co m O IL O O O • O I► C O to ♦ O a0 O It. O m 1p O O < m O m O 0 119 Page 53 m m p p O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O 10 It m CO h m 10 Y i I, �r A4, I II III {ICI'-r- .t� a ! m III iI�"!' _i-I III Q li I LU Ij' i+I Il�� IIII li III I I F III r I E m ¢ II IIII � " I- 41- Ilil it < II Ali I w O 0) 0IIII I II ¢ < �I I I I i I i iII � m c m I ! N w a W I I I C I II W .j H C m IIII I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I O O O O O O O O O O O O A o P. m 10 V 0 40 P m 10 < m to p p N I'.) J'I E < E a R N N N a W m c o O O O O o 1 I I 1 1 I A m A O to q* m O =1 e r� - Ilii�� Il�n�: �qrN l 1 � wa m C r 113 Page 55 c9 O O O O O O O O h O 10 Y I I 1 I I I it ' I III � f Ilil II' ill yi4 T` III Illi !I�, I I' II!I E IL < E N r m W cm cmW j III III.: III c go WLU �l Z IL � p i i I III co r ►- I I i = p I! I I I � i I a III I�j II I - III N .t Nul W C W I ! Ili r LII hill O o O O O o a a A O t0 V m C m G O O O O O O 0 I b I P. I 0 I i0 I f I < 0 0 co n 0 Lo It co O 0 0 MJ ji4 Paae 56 m to p p O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 co III OD to Y (a III III m Y i I 1 I 1 I I 1 i I 1 1 i CO i II it Q c� < E I I j I I I I CIA r i 01 d Q II W I I! I c w � z II I II a z rn p f- i S p III'' co III � i I III III;. r °�° N " o to a CY Q +- RIC r. pj LU w+i 1 p N I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I O O O O O O O O O O O O A Ca A m IO Y O ao P. CD 10 Y m m p p W- Page 57 Co D] p p O O O O O O O O O O O O Q <0 h m ip Y la OD P m iO Y L 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I �� I II j i II I I Iyl I I I I jl illl ' -I II � II li.� I' II;T I• III .Py _ Ili . III �I, it Ills i� ! II,I l I I I r I h I iI i I i!op ill r�x� Dill i' it II i' II _ '�u II li I III oCL r I < _i. � 1 E a USjl it W aD II I � I LU o jl °aD o I l III I ii I Ij ¢ a I�j Il o Uo III ;Ii it ( .III I i I i j I II i I li I I li I I _il II a a a I MA W 4! H < I a D_ o aVD I f�I I III a 000aoo 000000 (D b Y a 40 m 10 Y m co p p r Page 58 E In E N ev � N W W J r < < U O cry I l I I I� lY I� m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I II 11 IIII O IIIIIIIII O O III', O T;�II O O W m A m 10 Y m G s i �q f p' _41 r.� 4 41 i ■�i N 1�! Pacre 59 m m O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O b n m b Y 0 m P b 10 It Il .III III II �', �s 1 I I it I I III lilt III I I Ir �, I I'I III � l IIII ili ;III s$ yl l l i I, F I II I I' I I i III - I I III I' < I It I o I m ¢ < m a W (I III ¢ Cm + H O � ji l i III III iil w � I I W 0)i p III I I I I I < U III o j .Ye o a d I III i I� i O di I I r' CID I, cV N ui w J O co I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I O O O O O O O O O O O O A O P. b b V O CD P m to < m O p Ih iJ E N E I N c W W a z ao O f I"' Ir < < U = O U J n Y r � r ■ i P :.A 0 col III INIIri r■p IN�E�- •i� �S� �rN 1 I 1 I I O O O O O O O m to f m C O 0 a rage ni 0 m O p O O O O O O O O O O O O Jill i I i I I �l� ��0 il, i I Ill li III � Ij I II rr~III II II Ill III I`+-` "I III �i II fill I'I- I � t I I < U I E I I� E� N H N G III W l W o I z W O g� a z Y n rn p o cr U � I IRMII I I� Ilk I I I I I I co I III 111 it N N < W ll.t I. i l l 11 i I GOUD I! li II II I t 1 III I I I I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m A m to Y O b n m 10 V fa m G p b Page 62 m m C p O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 4D P O 10 v O m n m 10 V l 1 I ( 1 1 I I I I 1 I ~ U ►' I� Q V Ol N W ' L. f d ~ p m LIT o o = W D. z y p cr _ O I i I I I N I N a it � I II J � p dl II I�1 I' I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I O O O O O O O O O O O O A co N ID 10 Y 0 O N co 10 It m m p C ., .1 Z1 Page 63 E < E rf o 0 OD N a a L I�1 �r 3 I r■j'.M'■cc�■:�� iiii�lna. S- Gu'a�E m O m O 0 O O O O O I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b A m b f m O Paqe 64 m m p O O O G O O O O O O O O O O O K O to It A co P. m 10 It 4 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I lL Co II I III1 45 i it i I Ili I , ., II III I III III I fi -1 I�, �I II III I � bill i �I II. I I ' I I I I I I II I I II < I II E ncc j Q �? co W f' o I III I W I G w O } Z a z { l w o cr < c<iIL I I it o l � I I I I I W I I I I N N < �' I jli I I I I I W la �I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I II a m A to lb It 0 0 A m LID f m m p p 1 �)3 Page 63 E < E M 0) OD N N < w J H < < U O N (L C O O O O O p co A P. to 10 l I I I I I IL C O O O O O O A CD 1 I P. I m I ho I < I 1— U F < U 2 < w I. I'l; I� I l I Ill I I I ~ II j m l ! i o CD o z I I I I II II i I a u r i III I 11 III 'll III I� I I j I l II II II II II I I II I I i ' ji I I'I I I I II III Ili Y III � I III I ,I! Ili III �I III III 'I l 'Illi I' III II III I I I I� I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 A O A m to V A co m to < m m O a 1y? Page 66 O GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 6 SAMPLE 2 BARRIER CALCULATIONS 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 o Phone(714) 835.0249 Page 67 hAink -PT-0 1100 �Lvl� Milk A; 1 u5pv� 1 1 a I Y"n . .1 jk�PRTIM 155,1 %j7f F . . . . M 1 N R� UP TKR 1 V 1 Ohl. . ar A WINLY 14 Q i E F E C 7 & 9 K a F i I I T N A L 1, GOMM PLEYATruN ....... PEPETWFR PLEVA"TOW ..... PARRIM FLEVATT&N ...... QFFEIVER HFIGHT .. ..... DISIANKE TO GOURGE ..... 25 DIRTPNFF TO RECEIVER ... 12!,j -UPO NOISE LEVEL.... .. 76.5., MRk NOISE LEVEL ...... 05URCA MIGE LEVF� ..... 7 Y. M., OMMM ORRFKTT0N,DA . -) YOUL PLIGHT N013L LEVEL_ HAMERTION LOSS 2, oi-) TI.El 5. WaRR i RK NO I nT PEDUC T 1 ON kNAl 19 1 S PGOJECT ...... LA QUINTO Ts PTLQN..SECOND WALL EFFECT FOR !PFF THr WALL MUM& FiEVATION ....... 10 M&2�M ELEVATION ..... 0 MRIEV ELEVATION ...... 0 ,Fr4TWKQ HEIGHT. . . . . , . . 5 wMANCi TO MURCE ..... 25 �'�TXNKE TO FF5KIVER ... 12--, AHM KPPE LEVEI ...... 75.4 .1ply pp CUM= M! I Or I i L r i :i iNDERMN LOBS Page 68 -NPU151- 1 0 & Q K M 1 WL K F UN 14 Q'i 1i i. r "1 HO" SF i IN D Wwl I �T Ff Ef I MP 2FT 1 Sq WRL!_ DISTANCE FO SOURCE ..... FIST"NrE TO RECETWEP... 12E PUM NOISE LEVEL.— ... 79.'-) M.FRK NHHE EVEL ...... o H.Tnk M015L LEVEL ...... I) QNKHLAQ ­DPRECTJONMP) - 11 MIL "EIGHT MISE IEVEL MENTTON LOSS WAY'll! 04MY7 PnDUCTiON ANALvEM %CME&I ......LA QUINM F&APTiON—SECOND WALL EFFECT FUR 4FT 13T WALI.- onlP% &LEYATION ....... 11 ffF:hQP GE_ FVPTTON ..... 0 PHKK,EK ELEVATION ...... C) LC7fybH HEIGHF ........ . 5 M'=FANCE TO SOURCE ..... 25 OHIO NOMF LEVEL ...... Q,97 H.fqk 901SE LEVAL ...... 0 In LKEL . .78.V7 ,Qkwk 70FAR, TIII' &M I) 1 0019L LEVEL 7106FTEUN LuR' 1 !.ry ) Page 69 4 1 7 Ji 4 5 is V4 12 Page 70 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 7 WASHINGTON SOUND WALL CALCULATIONS 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 • Phone(714) 835.0249 Page 71 Aim 'F Nuj�E nybUL I �uN ANALYni PPOiLLF ...... LA QUIND-) FTEURIPTION—PiA WURUZ ULnVHTfQN ....... SARSTEK .nEVAIIUN ...... WR F MUR 1 Vi CA n lWASSIT 1! KF"E!.7K. . . 11D WTIJ 001GE LUYEI ...... 54 1! U 64. wi rohlows: mppvc! [hWup! - 0 WAL L n 1 W! i 0, I NO! VF �:.: I. WSEF 1 f ON u ..... 1 2. 7. W 41. 471. 4, 0i) t7. 93 12. ecl 55, F3. A S. 00 55. 1 G. 03 ,cm 54. 32 W. 60 10. oil 53. W 10.44 11.0, SAM4 11.16 12. A) 52. w 11. 0 f, Page 72 Page 73 ri(j ',.7!7 -7 C Page 74 al 10 7EDUCYmn ANOLIST--, &NOULAR MRACCTION&M - Q VAij wTBwr NflISF KEVEL !NPERTYDN LOSIE 0. Qk.j 00. 19 J. ri � 11 , 1 A 0-41 RARFTFA nu!M MDUCTION ANALyin., PROJECT ...... Lp ruNin, DESIRTPTION..&FONC( QF iTISTING HOMES ON OFT 1ST WALL AT POPOVEUN 2C POURCE EcEVATIGN ...... 9 RE CEMR ELEVATION ..... (,) RARRIER ELEVATION ...... Cj RECEIVER HEIGHT........ 5 019TANCE TO SOURCE ..... 100 DMANCE 70 RECEIVER... 110 AUTO NOISE LEVEL ...... 19.00 M.TRK NOISE H.TRF NOISE LEVEL ...... () �CUFCE NOISE LEVEL ..... 59.OS oNGULAR CORRECTIMM) - f) WALL HEIGHT NOISE LEVEL INSERTION LOSS 0.00 59.08 0.00 4, oi� 50.32 R. 76 BARRIER NOISE REDUCTION ANALYSIS PROJECT --LA OUNITA MESEMPTIM—EFFECT OF EXISTING HOUSE FOR 10FT IST WALL AT POSITION 2C 5OUKVATION ....... 10 RECEMP ELEVATION..... 0 BARRIER ELEVATION...... () RECEIVER HEIGHT........ 5 DISTANCE TO SOURCE..... 100 DISTANCE TO RECEIVER ... 110 AUTO NOME LEVEL...... 57.6 H.FPK NOPRE LEVEL ...... 0 h.TRK NOISE LEVEL ...... 0 SOPME NOISE 57.60 ANGULAN �QWnFQTTGNM) WALL PEISM NOME LEVEL 1MERTION LOSS vu Page 75 %KPILK N013E REDUC7EUN ANALM,-�i PPfQEUT.--LA QUINTA DGnCQJTI0H..iST WALL EFFECT 7CAll F f LKNATTGN ....... o RMLEVC4 ELLVATION ..... n 0EM945 HEIGH ......... . 00MANGG Vil : al, A L . . , , . z Vl-,_, wi&AME Q. ALCKMR ... Ae AUT5 Qu!�. YOE ...... 0 E M.FR� KOM InVLL ...... tj n 1 KY NO LOU F ANOMM QQm%ll(JN;TB) f-_' 7. 00 S. 00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.... AT POSITION V �.'F LE"IEL. INSERTION U003 00 1.19 0 2. Z 2" 5.68 61,79 6.22 41.26 6.74 6U.59 1.41 59.34 3.16 59.08 B.92 56.0.� 9.67 57.61 10.39 36.9'. 11.07 56. 30 11.70 Page 76 WA� �EDUCTLON ANnIQL Wri X—GALIDPATION OF olowYz Rowr= ....... C) REUW-II' CLEWOMN ..... ii hw&F.�K RECL 1 � Ev x ....... ANGULHK CAVECTIM,M) - 1? 7. v) A 0. ou W. U0 8, oi- W. M.3 Q,Q) wo. Q? 0. 00 60. W 11.0f) 59. 73 12. Do 59. 20 171. 00 58. W MS.) 58.06 POGITION n. :iq; MSERTION LOS'33 K. Als A.114 0, 7.11 7.65 8.22 S. SCI 9.37 9.94 10.43 .4— Page 77 nallE REDUCTION ANALY31- -SEGHT ........ . WTU WHESF 1 EVEL ...... M.TRK NOf7E LIVEL ...... H,TFW NOISE n�VEL ...... SGUME NOM INVEL ..... 12.UO ANGULAR CURRECTION&W .:t TO: FROM: IOW! � I MEMORANDUM HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF COMMISSION PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THE PLANNING DATE: MARCH 13, 1990 SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY RESPONSES ON THE AMENDMENTS TO THE HILLSIDE CONVERSATION ORDINANCE BASED ON THE PRESENTATION BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION COMMITTEE. The City Attorney responded to the following questions. QUESTIONS PRESENTED: 1. What are the procedural steps necessary to adopt a moratorium? 2. What inverse condemnation claims would arise from the adoption of the Conservation Committee's policy recommendations? MORATORIUM PROCEDURE: A moratorium may be adopted in two ways. First, a moratorium may be adopted as an interim ordinance without the normal notice and hearing requirements, provided that the ordinance prohibits uses which conflict with a proposal the Council is considering or studying (Government Code Section 65858(a)). Alternatively, a moratorium may be adopted as an interim ordinance, even though it is not related to a proposal or study item, with the normal notice and hearing requirements (Government Code Section 65858(b)). Either way, the ordinance requires a four -fifths vote, will expire in forty-five days, and may be extended for up to two years from the original adoption date upon further notice and hearing. INVERSE CONDEMNATION: Courts apply a two-part test to determine if a land use regulation has effectively taken a landowner's property. The most important of these tests is whether each landowner affected by the ordinance retains "economically viable use of his land". In making this determination, a court will consider both the remaining use and value of the landowner's parcel, as BJ/MEMOJH.054 - 1 - 137 well as the value of the transferred development rights. Courts approach the question of economic viability in an ad hoc, case -by -case manner, so it is impossible to predict the outcome of such a challenge. However, in the event that an owner was able to show that all avenues provided by the proposed ordinance were unusable or impracticable to the point of not being economically viable, the City could be found to have taken the owner's land by inverse condemnation in enacting the proposed changes. BJ/MEMOJH. 054 - 2 - 1 J Ii, BI-2 DATE: CASE NO: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 13, 1990 SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 JAMIE L. DAVIDSON FOR WASHINGTON SQUARE GROUP APPROVAL OF ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR A SPECIFIC PLAN AND ANNUAL REVIEW OF SPECIFIC PLAN. EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET, AND SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 111. This project is a mixed use commercial project which was approved by the City Council on March 21, 1989. The project generally consists of 348,000 square feet of retail, 19,000 square feet of restaurant, 90,000 square feet of office, 350 hotel rooms in two hotels, and a 900 seat cineplex. At the same time a change of zone for a majority of the site was approved from R-1 and R-1-12,000 to C-P-S. A Condition of approval of the Specific Plan was that there be an annual review of the Specific Plan to demonstrate that the Applicant is showing good faith compliance with the terms of the Specific Plan. Upon the determination by the Planning Commission that the Applicants are in compliance, a 12 month time extension may be granted. APPLICANT'S SUBSTANTIATION: The Applicant has submitted a letter indicating seven areas of activity on the project. The activities are as follows: 1. We have been working closely with Planning Staff, City hired engineers (BSI) and our engineers (ESCO) regarding the legal description for the right-of-way necessary along Washington Street. The legal description has been resolved by ESCO and BSI and we are in the process of executing grant deeds for the dedication of the right-of-way to the City of La Quinta. 2. We have met with A. G. Spanos Company regarding 47th Avenue and are in the process of having the legal description for the 47th Avenue right-of-way on our property prepared so we can dedicate the right-of-way to the City of La Quinta. A. G. Spanos Company plans to proceed with building 47th Avenue after the right-of-way dedication is completed. BJ/STAFFRPT.048 - 1 - J J rJ 3. We have contacted the Coachella Valley Water District regarding an easement on the south side of our property that contains a water line serving the church and residential area west of Washington Street. It appears that the water line and easement would be better serviced by CVWD if they were moved into the roadway of new 47th Avenue. 4. We are in the process of pursuing compliance with the mitigation of various archaeological issues on our property. 5. We have obtained an estimate of the off -site costs for our property. 6. We are currently involved in negotiations with a major national developer for the joint venture development of our property. This developer currently has projects in the Coachella Valley and is enthusiastic about development in the Valley. We are currently working on the entities needed for joint venture development of our property and evaluating the income tax aspects of various types of entities that might be used. 7. The lawsuit filed by William Weber and John Maselter on April 13, 1989 against the City of La Quinta and the City Council of La Quinta caused some delays with developers for our property, but now that the matter has been settled, development of our property is proceeding. ANALYSIS: Staff believes that the substantiation presented is sufficient to warrant: approval of a 12 month time extension for the Specific Plan. However, there are two items of concern Staff would like to bring up. The first is to remind the Applicant that since Highway Ill is a State Highway, they will need to work with Caltrans. Due to their procedures, this can be a lengthy process which should be anticipated in the Applicant's planning. Secondly, Staff is recommending a modification to Condition of Approval #10, pertaining to undergrounding of utility poles along Washington Street. In order to clarify the responsibility of the Applicant for undergrounding the utility lines, Staff recommends the following modification to Condition #10: BJ/STAFFRPT.048 - 2 - J. 10. The Applicant/Developer shall underground all existing overhead utility lines which are adjacent to or crossing the subject property. As an alternate, the Applicant may form an assessment district to achieve the undergrounding. Any assessment will be done on a benefit basis, as required by law. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept the Applicants evidence of good faith compliance with the terms of the Specific Plan and approve a 12 month extension by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 90- subject to the original Conditions of Approval, modifying Condition #10. Attachments: 1 2 3 4. Location and site plan map Letter of request and good faith compliance City Council Resolution 89-35, including Conditions of Approval Draft Planning Commission Resolution including of Approval approving 12 month extension of time Conditions BJ/STAFFRPT.048 - 3 9 ATTACHMENT 1 Mvm"uDff Lmm I ca=mfcw Red cater &'�Ohb 2 2W %W W401 3 ISO Roan &0" Plato 4 offlow a cbeoftz .0 7 epods" ftw q, t 4 8 Qj �� i` � a � I I I a�� I IL 0% — --------- 11 1 Pad Not a part Is - Traft slow Site Plan asruaaoTow CWAM LA WMA. C4 WASCOMM SOUAM e=Uy 3 c3 ATTACHMENT 2 STOUGHTON DAVIDSON Accountancy Corporation Certified Public Accountants 3433 West Shaw Avenue Suite 100 Fresno, California 93711 (209) 276-1200 Fax: (209) 276-2172 John S. Stoughton Jamie L. Davidson Tom K. McF-erson Ronald A. Ruether Harvey E. Hartman Gene L. Deetz J. David Spence J. Scott Bristol George F. Belyea Dennis D. Bean Scott T. Dye Marshall P. Scott Thomas L. Hunt February 22, 1990 FFB 2 6 1990 Jerry Herman, Director CITY OF LA QuiNTA Planning Department PLANNfNG & DEVELOPMENT DEPT. City of La Quinta 78-105 Calls Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Washington Square Specific Plan No. 87-011 Dear Jerry: This letter is to inform you of the status of the Washington Square Property and to demonstrate good faith compliance with the Conditions of Approval of the Specific Plan. We have the following information to report: 1) We have been working closely with planning staff, city hired engineers (BSI) and our engineers (ESCO) regarding the legal description for the right-of-way necessary along Washington Street. The legal description has been resolved by ESCO and BSI and we are in the process of executing grant deeds for the dedication of the right-of-way to the City of La Quinta. 2) We have met with A.G. Spanos Company regarding 47th Avenue and are in the process of having the legal description for the 47th Avenue right-of-way on our property prepared so we can dedicate the right-of-way to the City of La Quinta. A.G. Spanos Company plans to proceed with building 47th Avenue after the right-of-way dedication is completed. 3) We have contacted the Coachella Valley Irrigation District (CVID) regarding an easement on the south side of our property that contains a water line serving the church and residential area west of Washington Street. It appears that the water line and easement would be better serviced by CVID if they were moved into the roadway of new 47th Avenue. Jtj STOUGHTON DAVIDSON Jerry Herman, Director February 22, 1990 Page 2 4) We are in the process of pursuing compliance with the mitigation of various archaeological issues on our property. 5) We have obtained an estimate of the off -site costs for our property. 6) a) We are currently involved in negotiations with a major national developer for the joint venture development of our property. This developer currently has projects in the Coachella Valley and is enthusiastic about development in the valley. b) We are currently working on the entities needed for joint venture development of our property and evaluating the income tax aspects of various types of entities that might be used. 7) The lawsuit filed by William Weber and John Maselter on April 13, 1989 against the City of La Quinta and the City Council -of La Quinta caused some delays with developers for our property, but now that the matter has been settled, development of our property is proceeding. If you have any questions or would like to discuss our property further, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, L. Davihs n, 4CA :pl c:­L owners ATTACHMENT 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 89- 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CONCURRING WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 87-081 AND GRANTING APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 87-011, FOR WASHINGTON SQUARE. CASE NO. SP 87-011 - WASHINGTON SQUARE GROUP WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, did, on the 14th day of February, 1989, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Washington Square Group for a commercial development (Washington Square) for a +72-acre site located east of Washington Street, south and east of Simon Drive, south of Highway 111, west of Adams Street, and one-half mile north of Avenue 48, more particularly described as follows: A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBBM; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 21st day of March, 1989, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the Applicant's request and recommendation of the Planning Commission concerning the environmental analysis and Specific Plan No. 87-011; and, WHEREAS, said Specific Plan request has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director has conducted an initial study and has determined that, although the project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, the mitigation measures incorporated into the Conditions of Approval will mitigate those project impacts to levels of insignificance; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts to justify the approval of said Specific Plan: 1. That the proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, in that the property is designated Mixed Commercial which permits the uses proposed for the property, as described in the Planning and Development Department's Staff Report. MR/RESOCC.033J`tj 2. That the Specific Plan is compatible with the existing and anticipated area development. 3. That the project will be provided with adequate utilities and public services to ensure public health and safety. 4. That the project, as conditioned/illustrated, provides adequate circulation. 5. That the proposed project is conceptual; further review will be required under the commercial plot plan review process at which time development -related conditions will be attached to mitigate identified impacts contained in the environmental assessment. 6. That the need for the additional right-of-way is necessitated by the recently -revised Washington Street Specific Plan (SP 86-001), for the construction of a frontage road opposite this development. 7. That the archaeological impacts will be mitigated, as contained in the 1977 and 1985 studies. 8. That the noise impacts on the residential development to the west will be mitigated by the Developer who will participate in the construction of a noise wall based upon the amount of noise that can be attributed to this proposed development. 9. That thee undergrounding of overhead utility lines along Washington Street is necessary to enhance the aesthetics of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. '.That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council in this matter; 2. That it does hereby confirm the determination in Environmental Assessment No. 87-081, relative to the environmental concerns for this Specific Plan; 3. 'That it does hereby approve Specific Plan No. 87-011 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. MR/RESOCC.033 -2- 1'zps PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 21st day of March, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth and Mayor Pena NOES: Council Member Sniff ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None JOHN PENA Mayor ` City of La Quinta, California SXUNDRA L. JUHgV, City Clerk City of La Qui4nta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARRY BR.WT, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California MR/RESOCC.033 -3- , � 147 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 89-35 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WASHING,TON SQUARE SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 MARCH 21, 1989 1. The development shall comply with Exhibit 1, the Specific Plan document for Specific Plan 87-011 and the following conditions, which conditions shall take precedence in the event of any conflicts with the provisions of the Specific Plan. 2. The project shall be limited to access points as illustrated on the Specific Plan "Site Plan", Exhibit 2. 3. In conjunction with the submittal of a commercial plot plan application, the Developer shall submit a noise study certified by a licensed professional engineer who 'has prepared acoustical studies. The study shall focus on the noise generated by this non-residential use (including traffic noise generated by the development) as it could affect the residential uses along the west side of Washington Street. Based upon the study, as approved by the Planning and Development Department, mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the project, such as participation in the construction of a noise wall along the Washington Street frontage road. The Developer will participate in the sharing of the total construction cost based on a equitable formula of traffic trips of the project relative to the cumulative trips proposed along Washington Street. 4. The Applicant/Developer shall dedicate all necessary public street right-of-way for Washington Street within 30 days after final approval of the Specific Plan. 5. The building heights noted in the Specific Plan are subject to the requirements of development standards of the C-P-S zone. 6. Commercial retail uses shall not be permitted on any satellite pad located along Washington Street or Highway ill. 7. The architectural elevations noted in the Specific Plan are conceptual and subject to further review and approval by the commercial plot plan process. MR/CONAPRVL.050 -1- GG g,q - 3S 8. The Developer is subject to the mitigations noted in the archaeological reports, dated September 1977 and 1985. The Planning Commission shall conduct annual reviews of this Specific Plan. During each annual review by the Commission, the Developer/Applicant shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Specific Plan. The Applicant/Developer of Washington Square hereby agrees to furnish such evidence of Washington Square's compliance as the City, in the exercise of its reasonable discretion, may require. Evidence of goof faith compliance may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, good faith compliance with the requirements of the Specific Plan. Upon conclusion of the annual review, the Commission may extend the approval period for 12 months at a time. 10. The Applicant agrees to be included in a future assessment district for undergrounding of overhead utility lines along Washington Street. Any assessments will be done on a benefit basis, as required by law. MR/CONAPRVL.050 -2- j�9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND GRANTING A 12 MONTH EXTENSION OF TIME SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 - WASHINGTON SQUARE GROUP WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, did, on the 14th day of February, 1989, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Washington Square Group for a commercial development (Washington Square) for a +72-acre site located east of Washington Street, south and east of Simon Drive, south of Highway 111, west of Adams Street, and one-half mile north of Avenue 48, more particularly described as follows: A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBBM; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California., did, on the 21st day of March, 1989, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the Applicant's request and recommendation of the Planning Commission concerning the environmental analysis and Specific Plan No. 87-011 and adopted City Council Resolution 89-35, approving Specific Plan 87-011; and, WHEREAS, at the request of the Applicant, the Planning Commission considered the annual review of the Specific Plan and a 12 month extension of time on the 13th day of March, 1990; and, WHEREAS, said time extension complied with the requirement of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director has determined that the Specific Plan has been previously assessed for environmental impacts and that a Negative Declaration was adopted; and, WHEREAS, at said meeting, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify the granting of a 12 month time extension: 1. The Applicant has demonstrated good faith compliance with the terms of the Specific Plan. BJ/RESOPC.044 - 1 - ° J J(% 2. The Specific Plan is consistent with the adopted La Quinta General Plan in that the property is designated for Commercial, and further, that the Applicant's hotel proposal is consistent with the land use designation. 3. There are no physical constraints which could prohibit development of the site as proposed. 4. The project will be provided with adequate utilities and public services to ensure public health and safety, provided current Fire Department requirements are complied with. 5. The mitigation measures attached to the original Specific Plan approval agreed to by this Applicant and incorporated into the Conditions of Approval, will mitigate any adverse environmental impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission. of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. The the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That. it does hereby approve a 12 month extension of time for Specific Plan 87-011 subject to all current Conditions of Approval, amending Condition #10, as attached and labeled Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this 13th day of March, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN WALLING, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Planning Director City of La Quinta, California BJ/RESOPC.044 - 2 - '. 1 J .1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 90- EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 MARCH 13, 1990 * Modified by Planning Commission on March 13, 1990 1. The development shall comply with Exhibit 1, the Specific Plan document for Specific Plan 87-011 and the following conditions, which conditions shall take precedence in the event of any conflicts with the provisions of the Specific Plan. 2. The project shall be limited to access points as illustrated on the Specific Plan "Site Plan", Exhibit 2. 3. In conjunction with the submittal of a commercial plot plan application, the Developer shall submit a noise study certified by a licensed professional engineer who has prepared acoustical studies. The study shall focus on the noise generated by this non-residential use (including traffic noise generated by the development) as it could affect the residential uses along the west side of Washington Street. Based upon the study, as approved by the Planning and Development Department, mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the project, such as participation in the construction of a noise wall along the Washington Street frontage road. The Developer will participate in the sharing of the toted construction cost based on a equitable formula of traffic trips of the project relative to the cumulative trips proposed along Washington Street. 4. The Applicant/Developer shall dedicate all necessary public street right-of-way for Washington Street within 30 clays after final approval of the Specific Plan. 5. The building heights noted in the Specific Plan are subject to the requirements of development standards of the C-P-S zone. 6. Commercial retail uses shall not be permitted on any satellite pad located along Washington Street or Highway ill. 7. The architectural elevations noted in the Specific Plan are conceptual and subject to further review and approval by the commercial plot plan process. BJ/CONAPRVL.044 - 1 - �J 2 Conditions of Approval -Specific Plan 87-011 March 13, 1990 8. The Developer is subject to the mitigations noted in the archaeological reports, dated September 1977 and 1985. 9. The Planning Commission shall conduct annual reviews of this Specific Plan. During each annual review by the Commission, the Developer/Applicant shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Specific Plan. The Applicant/Developer of Washington Square hereby agrees to furnish such evidence of Washington Square's compliance as the City, in the exercise of its reasonable discretion, may require. Evidence of goof faith compliance may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, good faith compliance with the requirements of the Specific Plan. Upon conclusion of the annual review, the Commission may extend the approval period for 12 months at a time. *10. The Applicant/Developer shall underground all existing overhead utility poles and lines which are adjacent to or crossing the subject property. As an alternate, the Applicant may form an assessment district to achieve the undergrounding. Any assessment will be done on a benefit basis, as required by law. BJ/CONAPRVL.044 - 2 - ]�3 BI-1 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: MARCH 13, 1990 OWNER/ APPLICANT: M. J. BROCK & SONS PROJECT: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL ELEVATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 25389 (DUNA LA QUINTA). LOCATION: EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET BETWEEN 50TH AVENUE AND CALLE RONDO EXTENSION, AND CALLE RONDO AND PARK AVENUE ALIGNMENT. 1. BACKGROUND- The Conditions of Approval for TT 25389 state the following regarding approval of unit elevations: "11. The Applicant shall submit complete detail architectural elevations for all units, for Design Review Board review and recommendation to the Planning Commission. The matter will be scheduled as a Business Item before the Planning Commission for review and approval. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the draft C.C. & R's to the Planning and Development Department for review." On March 7, 1990, the Design Review Board, after discussion, recommended approval of the submitted elevations and color board for TT 25389. This matter is now before the Planning Commission for review and approval. BJ/STAFFRPT.049 - 1 - �Jr 2. PROPOSED UNITS Four Units Have Been Proposed Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Plan 4 2204 2269 2734 3017 Stories 1 1 2 2 # Different Elevations 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 # Bathrooms 3 2-1/2 3 3-1/2 # Family Rooms 0 1 1 1 # Garages 2 2 3 3 3. ANALYSIS: The units are all of an architectural style in keeping with other dwellings in the La Quinta area. All units have sufficient architectural detailing on all four sides. The Applicant has proposed a desert color scheme for these units. This is appropriate for the desert area and consistent with City policy on this issue. 4. REC:OMMENDATION: Approve by minute motion the elevations and color scheme for Tentative Tract 25380. Attachments: 1. Floor plans and elevations for TT 25389 BJ/STAFFRPT.049 - 2 - r J ') Y V ZM= 5_m OFN J OF P. 8 Q N U M Hj Y V Zm00 yY: N <.F- U O Z U) Z Q Z O �0 J Y �¢U �Q0 azm Q� O J J L5 1�7 z o k R z O F w � ` 3�Z` �bz gym: 0 Z a Y 3 ... 8 ® z B (LL/� Z QzO Y �QU < cz zm Q o JQ� J �J� 52 E +�so V in Z Z Q z O J Y �QU <rl zm Q o ® J w ¥ mZN � ^ b loz d Z O a Y a 3 ON U z U ®LL Z (/� Z QzO o °6 Y zLL /�QU V Z m Q0 < L L~J �pp �2 22 F �4RHO U ® Z Cl)Z Qz0 F- o ®QU <O Zm Q0 JL ,% , J / 2 ) \ /[6 § /|| 1;Uzi \ Z Z Ln Q}0 V) �bk Z� D\O �\/ J«\ !G2 R s e s (_5 0 Z LL Cl) z Q z O 1. 0 zJ /Y O zm D QO� J3� <VP ° bz Rg� s z O z Y 3` v z U ® z LL Q z O a- 0 Y ®¢U �Q0 �Zm Qo PH-1 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: MARCH 13, 1990 ITEM: TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 APPLICANT: LA QUINTA JOINT VENTURE OWNER: LANDMARK LAND COMPANY REQUEST: TO RE -SUBDIVIDE +26.81 ACRES WITHIN RECORDED TRACTS 14496-6 AND 14496-7, FROM 13 CONDOMINIUM LOTS AND 127 UNITS, TO 54 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS FOR DETACHED CUSTOM HOMES (SEE ATTACHMENT #1) LOCATION: WITHIN THE LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN (A.K.A. SANTA ROSA COVE), ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENIDA FERNANDO, + 1/4-MILE WEST OF EISENHOWER DRIVE (SEE ATTACHMENT #2)• NET DENSITY: 2.35 UNITS PER ACRE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 UNITS PER ACRE) SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: NO LAND USE PLAN APPROVED; FOLLOWS LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION. ZONING: R-2-8000, R-2-10,000, R-5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: THE REVISED SPECIFIC PLAN #121-E FOR LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB WAS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE AN I14ITIAL STUDY FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. PURSUANT TO THIS REQUIREMENT, AN INITIAL STUDY (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 89-146) WAS PREPARED (SEE ATTACHMENT #3). THIS STUDY IDENTIFIED MINOR IMPACTS RELATED TO TRAFFIC, LIGHT/GLARE, AND AESTHETICS. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THESE IMPACTS CAN BE MITIGATED THROUGH MEASURES IMPOSED AS APPROVAL CONDITIONS IF THE SUBJECT TRACT IS APPROVED; THEREFORE, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN PREPARED. BJ/STAFFRPT.046 - 1 - 0,JI I j( PROJECT BACKGROUND: THE PROPOSED TRACT IS A PORTION OF THE OVERALL SPECIFIC PLAN FOR LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB, ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 1975. TRACT 14496 WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED AS A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 589 STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM UNITS; CURRENT APPROVALS IN EFFECT FOR THE TRACT AREA BOUNDARY ALLOW 541 UNITS, OF WHICH 77 ARE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. 14496-4 AND 14496-5 HAVE ALSO BEEN PREVIOUSLY RE -SUBDIVIDED A19D RECORDED AS TRACTS 21813 AND 21120, RESPECTIVELY. THESE TWO TRACTS COMPRISE THE 77 DETACHED UNITS, WHICH PREVIOUSLY WERE 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 PROPOSES 54 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS FOR CUSTOM HOME DEVELOPMENT. THE TRACT ENTRY IS FROM AVENIDA FERNANDO, +250-FEET WEST OF AVENIDA OBREGON. THE MAP BEFORE YOU IS THE PRODUCT OF SEVERAL REVISIONS, PARTLY DUE TO STAFF REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND PARTLY DUE TO CHANGES IN MARKETING APPROACH BY THE APPLICANT. THE PROJECT CONTAINS A TIERED WATERFALL TREATMENT (LOT E) WINDING AROUND LOT 49, WITH A 7-FOOT WATER SURFACE VARIATION DOWN TO STREET LOT H. THE TRACT UTILIZES 37-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY PRIVATE; STREETS EXCEPT AT CUL-DE-SAC ACCESS POINTS (LOTS K, L, M), WHERE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY I'S REDUCED TO 32-FEET. THE SMALLEST LOT SIZE IS 13,200 SQUARE FEET, THE LARGEST BEING OVER 20,000 SQUARE FEET. THE PROPOSED MAP SHOWS THE CURRENT GUARDHOUSE/GATE ON AVENIDA FERNANDO RELOCATED TO APPROXIMATELY 85-FEET WEST OF AVENIDA OBREGON. A MINIMUM 15-FOOT FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL IS ALSO INDICATED ALONG THE BASE OF THE NORTHERLY HILLSIDE AREAS. ANALYSIS:, 1. Access: This Map has been revised, in part, due to access requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and Fire Mairshal's requirements. The currently proposed design provides secondary access from the cul-de-sac (dead end) streets at the intersection of Lots C and D. The 33-foot right-of-way streets may be permitted with adequate parking, striping and signage limitations as required by the Fire Marshal. These requirements are called out in the proposed Conditions of Approval. Note: Staff policy has been to require minimum 36-foot curb to curb widths e. BJ/STAFFRPT.046 - 2 - 1u on private streets; however, the Applicant has consistently maintained that topographic constraints limit them from providing that width throughout the entire tract. Staff feels that this argument is justified. 2. Guard Gate Relocation: On November 21, 1989, Amendment #2 to Specific Plan 121-E was approved by the City Council to allow the construction of 77 additional hotel units along the west side of Avenida Obregon. This approval amended the previous existing Specific Plan conditions to add the following requirement: "Existing security gate arms on Avenida Fernando shall be located from existing location to Avenida Fernando west of Avenida Obregon. 'Emergency only' vehicular security gates with pedestrian and golf cart access only shall be installed on Avenida Obregon near southern boundary of recently completed overflow parking lot to separate hotel traffic from condominium traffic. Gates to be approved by City Engineer." Any subsequent development approval within the Specific Plan area must comply with the intent of this provision. Due to the timing of Tentative Tract 25237 relative to this requirement, a condition has been prepared to address the required relocation within the! context of the above Specific Plan condition. As evidenced on the tract map exhibit, the Applicant has anticipated the imposition of this requirement. The condition essentially requires that the Obregon gate be underway by May 1, 1990, and that a bond be submitted to insure that the Avenida Fernando gate is relocated by December 31, 1990. The Applicant is not precluded from working with any of the he existing homeowner associations regarding installation of the Obregon gate. 3. Tract Design: A number of minor design items that can be resolved through conditions have been addressed by the recommended conditions. Some of the more significant are as follows: A. Lot H: Require entry design to be :reviewed by Fire Marshal and City Engineer with street plan and gate relocation plot plan submittals. Remove existing gate area cutout with street improvements. B. Lot I: Must be improved as part of circulatory street system. This lot will be a common area street lot to allow access to Lot 54, and will be made part of Lot A. BJ/STAFFRPT.046 - 3 - 1 i� R C. Lot F: widen to minimum ten feet along east side of Lot 41 to allow room to maintain it. Also, to be aligned radially to street Lot B, and should generally align with common lot line for Lots 40 and 42. 4. Santa Rosa Cove Homeowner's Association: This group was very involved in the gate relocation issue. A condition has been prepared to include this association in review of the detailed gating plan relocation during the Planning and Development Department Staff :review. FINDINGS: Findings to support approval of Tentative Tract 25237 can be found in 'the attached Planning Commission Resolution 90- RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 90- , recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract 25237, subject to the conditions. Attachments: 1. TT 25237, Final Revision 2. Location Map 3. Environmental Assessment 89-146 4. Planning Commission Resolution 90- , with conditions BJ/STAFFRPT.046 - 4 -°•�'tun IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA TENTATIVE Tilm"AY ® mg P nNsOY ■ BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SEC.86 T.5S. R.6E. S.BM. AND ALL OF TRACT 14496--6, M.B. 140/64-65 AND ALL OF TRACT 14496-7 M.B. 140/66-67 ALL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 1989 IRECoF..iifrI ,8) FEB 2 3 1990 Tv vr- uH Qu,iNTA MINK & D.VE!OPMENT DEPT. � r �:T�ecmcv .wac� rvn.f. �us.+uTTcsm .oTs .�:YR rnco. Q. 4 6'�EVIv�tC�r_Q r1111..4 II EXHIBIT JTA!(T J(CT•ON / , CI�SE NO. ���✓ // .vpl IfF.W w'00 2962 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 (714) 540-1588 Planning Commision La Quinta City Hall 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Gentlemen, March 6, 1990 L . LA . ' . - `')L T. As an early condo owner in Santa Rosa Cove, I want to join with the other owners in the area to urge your requirement for the changes in the Security Gates which have been under discussion. The traffic of those going to the Hotel and the Tennis Club on Santa Rosa Cove streets should be kept to a minimum. Sincerely, IRVIN C. CHAPMAN ICC:am r „� TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 089-146 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CITY CASE NO: TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF AVENIDA FERNANDO, + 114-MILE WEST OF EISENHOWER DRIVE, WITHIN THE LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (SANTA ROSA COVE). PROPOSAL CONSIDERED: RESUBDIVISION OF CONDO MAPS 14496-6 AND 14496-7, FROM 13 CONDO LOTS AND 127 UNITS TO 54 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. NET ACREAGE: 26.8 ACRES + NET DENSITY: 2.35 U.P.A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PLAN: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 UNITS/ACRE) EXISTING ZONING: R-5, R-2-8000, R-2-10,000 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: PROPOSED TRACT IS A PORTION OF THE OVERALL SPECIFIC PLAN FOR LA QUINTA COVE GOLF CLUB, ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 1975. TRACT 14496 WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED AS A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 589 STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM UNITS; CURRENT APPROVALS IN EFFECT FOR THE TRACT AREA BOUNDARY ALLOW 541 UNITS, OF WHICH 77 ARE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. 14496-4 AND 14496-5 HAVE ALSO BEEN PREVIOUSLY RESUBMITTED AND RECORDED AS TRACTS 21813 AND 21120, RESPECTFULLY. THESE TWO TRACTS COMPRISE THE 77 DETACHED UNITS, AND PREVIOUSLY WERE 125 CONDOMINIUM UNITS. APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE PROPOSAL FROM ORIGINAL 63 LOTS TO 54 LOTS. CITY OF LA QUINTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -1 ) 3 CS/DOCWN.001 - 1 - CIW OF LL QBIRTA op d� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 44 QymerA Soho T- �kwr?A?w 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: A0 *Ta. ... 3. Date of .Checklist: / /Z-ZJ gip 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Leo S. Name of Proposal, if applicable: TINT 77ZxCr ZSZ?�- II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers to required on attached sheets.) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? Z c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — X e. Any increases in wind or water erosion of soils, _ either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach, sands, _ or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: _ a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: _ a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? — b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? _ c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? /rvatfrr4,-rre. — e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? 'e X _ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- , drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (3) Yes Maybe No h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: L` s - a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic Plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or result in a barrier 'to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural _ crop? S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds„ land animals, including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new _ light or glare? - 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: — a. Increase in the rate of any use of any natural resources? /u C04^9- I b. Substantial depletion of any renewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk — of -an explosion or the release of hazardous sub- stances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, istri ution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal — result a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? — b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? — (4) Yes Maybe No C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? x d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? x b. Police protection? c. Schools? x d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, :including roads? X f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. _ Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? i b. Communications systems? k C. Water? V d. Sewer or septic tanks? X _ e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? - 17. -Human Health. Will the proposal result in: -- a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the o station of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive :site open to public view? X 19. _ Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recrea- tional opportunities? X 20. Archeo logical/His tori cal. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Mandatory Finding of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially re- duce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plantor animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X (5) Yes Maybe No b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, an- . vironmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is .. relatively small, but where the effectof the - total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation; I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a Significant effect on the environment, then will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation - measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: 417Z2 (6) Signature Assoc rrr A -a- —Cr 1 'i TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25237 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 89-146 III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Earth: Localized impacts to soil conditions, topography, etc. will occur due to grading and other construction operations. Conditions imposed on the development approval will adequately mitigate these impacts. These include preparation of and supervision during construction of grading plans. Interim soil erosion protection program to be required, soil reports to assure proper compaction, adherence to seismic and all other U.B.C. requirements during unit construction, and adequate scope protection from falling rock and/or soil due to earthshaking, land/mud slide, etc. 2. Air: No significant impacts to air quality are foreseen. Appropriate dust control measures will be required during construction. Traffic from project build -out not seen as a significant cumulative impact. 3. Water: Due to projects location at base of hillside slopes, there is some impact relative to drainage & storm water conveyance patterns, rate and amount of runoff, etc. These changes can be accommodated through adherence to approved grading/drainage plans as required by the C.E. Discharges into surface waters will be incremental and are not viewed as significant, though there will be an increase due to development activity. 4. Plant Life: No significant plant spices exist That would indicate a measurable impact.. Some Palm stands exist on the property, but are not of significant value other than for aesthetic value or relocation; the applicant has intention to retain and/or relocate some of these Palm trees on -site. 5. Animal Life: No significant impacts are envisioned to any animal species. Original EIR #41 did not identify any specific mitigation in this area. 6. Noise: Some increase in existing noise levels will occur due to development activity and once the project is built -out (i.e.: vacant land to residential use). Build -out noise is insignificant. Interim construction noise will be mitigated through adherence to established working hours as adopted by the City. CS/DOCWN.001 - 2 - ° .l l IS 7. Light & Glare: Incremental increase will occur due to landscaping & structure -related lighting systems. All lighting must conform to recently adopted outdoor light control ordinance of the L.Q.M.C. 8. Land Use: No significant change. Proposed density is lower than previously approved; project will be individual lots with custom homes rather than condominiums. 9. Natural Resources: Incremental but insignificant increase in use of various resources will occur (vacant to urban use). No significant impact identified. 10. Risk of Upset: No foreseeable risk of upset envisioned. 11. Population: Scale of project will not significantly alter population characteristics. 12. Housing: Scale of project will not significantly alter housing characteristics. 13. Transportation/Circulation: The proposal may have some degree of impact upon circulation in the immediate area. Relocation of Fernando gate will alter current patterns of transportation to some extent, though this is not quantifiable. As with any project, there will be some increase in traffic conflicts and hazard risk to pedestrians and vehicular traffic. The seasonal nature of the overall Specific Plan indicates these impacts will be experienced to a lesser degree. The gate relocation should serve to further mitigate the above impact potential by reducing traffic entries into the 50th Avenue/Calle Mazatlan gate area, as well as curb traffic flows through the residential portions and Avenida Obregon (Note: Obregon will also be gated at its southerly terminus) into the rear of the existing hotel site. 14. Public Services: No significant impact to public service needs are anticipated. Project is a private, gated development with private streets and amenities. 15. Energy: No significant energy requirements or new systems will be necessary due to this project. 16. Utilities: No significant utility requirements or new systems will be necessary due to this project. CS/DOCWN.001 - 3 - 17. Human Health: No potential for health hazards are identified. 18. Aesthetics: Viewsheds may be somewhat obscured if some design limitations are not provided and enforced. Height restriction is the primary means of controlling view obstruction. CC&R's will be required to be submitted and recorded along with the Final Map. These may be similar to those approved for Tentative Tract 21120, immediately west of this project. 19. Recreation: No significant impact to recreation needs are anticipated. Project is a private, gated development with private streets & amenities. 20. Archaeological/Historical: According to Archaeological survey prepared for EIR #41 (S.R. Mc Williams) there is no significant cultural resource potential in the area of this project. Identified areas of concern are located near the hotel area and southeasterly sites. 21. Mandatory Finding of Significance: The proposal does not have any significant potential identified to in any way degrade the quality of the environment, to discount long -germ environmental considerations, impact any resource or environmental factor on a cumulative basis, or cause substantial adverse impacts to human health. Wallace H. Nesbit Associate Planner CS/DOCWN.001 - 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 89-146 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES The following is a summary of nonstandard mitigation measures to be required as Conditions of Approval for this project. "Non -Standard" implies measures not commonly applied to a specific development project as a standard approval condition or requirement; i.e., a condition "unique" to a given project or circumstance surrounding a project. Earth Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department an interim landscape program for the entire tract, which shall be for the purpose of wind erosion and dust control. The land owner shall institute blowsand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a„ The use of irrigation during any construction activities; b. Planting of cover crop or vegetation upon previously graded but undeveloped portions of the site; C. Provision of wind breaks or wind rows, fencing, and/or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The land owner shall comply with requirements of the Director of Public Works and Planning and Development. All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent the emission of dust and blowsand. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a condition so as to prevent a dust and blowsand nuisance and shall be either ;planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures as approved by the Planning and Development and Public Works Departments. Water The Applicant shall design and install the required flood control facilities in accordance with the following requirements a. A hydrology study of the mountainous area adjacent to the tract shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer to determine what storm drain improvements are needed to protect the tract from storm water run-off produced by a 100-year storm. CS/DOCWN.001 - 5 b. A positive storm drain system shall be installed that is capable of intercepting and conveying the 100-year storm water run-off from the mountainous area adjacent to the tract to a discharge area approved by the City Engineer. C. The intercept storm drain system shall be constructed in a common area lot that is part of the tract. d. The homeowner's association charged with maintaining the common areas in the tract shall also be responsible for maintaining the storm drain system, and said responsibility shall be so noted in the C.C. & R's. e. Storm water run-off produced by a 100-year storm that is attributable to areas within the tract shall be retained on site in a lake, a landscaped retention basin(s), or discharged to an off -site area as may be approved by the City Engineer. Applicant shall obtain adequate easements to allow any tributary off -site drainage through Lot N, subject to approval of the City Engineer. Easement shall stipulate Lot N specifically for drainage purposes and access for maintenance thereof: only. Traffic/Circulation Applicant shall comply with the following requirements of the public Works Department: a. The Applicant shall dedicate all necessary street and utility easements as required by the City Engineer, including all corner cutbacks. b. The Applicant shall submit street improvement plans for all private street lots that are prepared by a registered civil engineer. Street improvements, including traffic signs and markings shall conform to City standards as determined by the City Engineer and adopted by the La Quinta Municipal Code (three-inch AC over four -inch Class 2 Base minimum for residential streets). Improvement plans shall provide for the removal of the existing gate area cutout and appropriate transition improvements. The Applicant shall construct the following street improvements to the requirements of the City Engineer and the La Quinta Municipal Code, as follows: CS/DOCWN.001 - 6 - I'' Jc'�2 a. That the Applicant shall construct street improvements for all private street lots (including Lot H and necessary transitions to Avenida Fernando), to the requirements of the City Engineer and the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). b. Primary access streets in the tract shall have horizontal curve radii that equal or exceed the 300-foot minimum required by the Subdivision Ordinance, except where a reduced radius is permitted by the City Engineer, the following conditions shall apply: 1). Applicant shall provide a minimum 4-foot sidewalk on inside of curve where radius has been reduced to get pedestrians out of the street. 2.) Applicant shall provide an adequate sight distance easement across portion of lot(s) on inside of curve where radius has been reduced. All streets having widths less than 36-feet shall be designated as fire lanes and marked with red curbing and signage as follows: a. North side of Street Lot "K". b. East Side of Street Lot "L". C. South and west side of Street Lot "M". d. Both sides of Street Lot "I". Applicant shall be responsible for the relocation of the existing Fernando gate and all appurtenant structures located on Avenida Fernando. Relocation shall be sited generally as shown on Exhibit "A" for TT 25237. Design and specific siting of the gates and guardhouse shall be reviewed as required by these conditions. The extent of this requirement is as follows: a. Relocation of existing Avenida Fernando gate/guardhouse as specified herein. Construction for this improvement shall be bonded and commence concurrently with transitional improvements for Lot H/Avenida Fernando, and shall be bonded for completion no later than December 31, 1990. Failure to complete the Avenida Fernando relocation by this date will result in forfeiture of the bond to the City, which shall retain the right to fully complete the approved installation(s). b. Replacement/removal of existing gate area cutout for match -up with current street design of Avenida Fernando for unobstructed for east -west traffic flow in accordance with the approved street improvement plans. (See Condition #15) CS/DOCWN. 001 - 7 - , , `} 3 C. Installation of "Emergency Only" vehicular security gate with pedestrian and golf cart access only on Avenida Obregon near the southerly boundary of the La Quinta Hotel overflow parking lot (across from La Casa) to separate hotel and residential traffic. This installation shall be bonded for, and shall be completed no later than three months from the date of City Council approval of TT 25237. Failure to fulfill this requirement will result in forfeiture of the bond to the City, which shall retain the right to fully complete the installation. Until a plot plan approval and building permits for the above items have been obtained, no building permits for any units or common facilities within the tract shall be issued. Aesthetics The Applicant shall establish a Design Review Committee to review and approve all development within TT 25237. This Committee formation shall be reflected within the C.C. & R's for this tract. The main objectives of this Committee shall be as follows: a. Assure development compliance with Specific Plan 121-E and all applicable C.C. & R's. b. Determine that development- with TT 25237 is compatible with existing and proposed development within Santa Rosa Cove in terms of architecture, mass, height and bulk of structures, and landscape design. d. Assure that the building architecture, building materials and colors of development within TT 25237 follows a consistent design theme which is in keeping with the balance of the Santa Rosa Cove project. 28. Applicant shall establish within the C.C. & R's site design standards appropriate to estate lots, including but not limited to, front, side and rear setbacks, lot coverage, etc. Standards shall be reviewed by the Planning and Development Department as part of its review of the C.C. & R's, but be no less restrictive than the R-2 Zone standards. Building height shall be limited to one story, not to exceed 17-feet from finished lot pad grade. CS/DOCFrN.001 - 8 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF A RESIDENTIAL LAND SALES SUBDIVISION. CASE NO. TT 25237 - LA QUINTA JOINT VENTURE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta did adopt Specific Plan No. 121-E, Revised, as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 82-54, on October 5, 1982, and: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 20th day of September, 1988, adopt City Council :Resolution #88-112, approving Amendment #1 to Specific Plans 121-E, Revised, and; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 21st day of November 1989, adopt City Council Resolution #89-129, approving Amendment 42 to Specific Plan 121-E, Revised, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 13th day of March, 1990, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the: request of La Quinta Joint Venture to subdivide 26.81 acres into single-family custom lots, generally located on the north side of Avenida Fernando + 1/4 mile west of Eisenhower Drive more particularly described as: A PORTION OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN; AND ALL OF TRACTS 14496-6 & 14496-7, MB 140/64-67 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, said tentative map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-213, adopted by referencein City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director conducted an initial study, as required by the approval conditions for Specific Plan 121-E, Revised, as amended, and has determined that the proposed tentative tract will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment; and WHEREAS, mitigation of certain physical impacts have been identified and incorporated into the approval conditions for Tentative Tract 25237, thereby requiring that monitoring of those mitigation measures be undertaken to assure compliance with them; and, BJ/RESOPC.045 1 - , 1 ,Yj WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify the approval of said tentative tract map: 1. That: Tentative Tract No. 25237, as conditionally approved, is generally consistent with the goals, policies, and intent of the La Quinta General Plan for land use density, unit type, circulation requirements, R-2 zoning district development standards, and design requirements of the Subdivision ordinance. 2. The conditions attached to Tentative Tract 25237 will ensure consistency with Specific Plan #121-E, Revised, as amended and currently in effect, thereby making the approval of Tentative Tract 25237 consistent with said Specific Plan. 3. Tentative Tract No. 25237 is within the Specific Plan No. 121-E, Revised, for which a Final Environmental Impact report was prepared and certified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. A Negative Declaration was adopted by the La Quinta City Council for Tentative Tract 14496, which was the previous Tentative Tract approved for a portion of this site. The above prior approvals contained environmental mitigation measures which will apply to this project, along with current City requirements to be imposed. 4. Tentative Tract 25237 is a re -subdivision of previously approved and recorded Tract 14496, of which the subject re -subdivided portion contained 127 condominium units. The general impacts associated with Tentative Tract 25237, which proposes 54 single-family estate lots, will be significantly less than those previously addressed in the original EIR #41 for the La Quinta Cove Golf Club Specific Plan and the Environmental Assessment for Tract 14,196. 5. That the subject site was previously approved for 127 condominium units as part of Specific Plan 121-E and Tentative Tract 14496. The proposed circulation and single-family design for 54 lots, as conditioned, are suitable for the proposed land division, as the general impacts will be less significant. 6. That the design of the subdivision, as conditionally approved, will be developed with public sewer and water, and, therefore, is not likely to cause serious public health problems. BJ/RESOPC.045 - 2 - 1of) rJ, 7. That: the design of Tentative Tract Map No. 25237 will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through the project, since alternate easements for access and for use will be provided that are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case: 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion of Environmental Assessment No. 89-146, indicating that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not result in any significant environmental impacts, and that a Negative Declaration is appropriate; 3. That it does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of the subject Tentative Tract Map No. 25237 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this 13th day of March, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN WALLING, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Planning Director City of La Quinta, California BJ/RESOPC.045 - 3 - 1.; J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 90- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMEND TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 MARCH 13, 1990 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Tentative Tract Map 25237 shall comply with the requirements and standards of Specific Plan 121-E Revised, as amended, the State Subdivision Map Act and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code, unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. 2. This Tentative Tract Map approval shall expire two years after the original date of approval by the La Quinta City Council unless approved for extension pursuant to the City of La Quinta Land Division Ordinance. 3. The Applicant acknowledges that the City has formed a City-wide Landscape and Lighting District and, by recording a subdivision map, agrees to be.included in the District and to offer for dedication such easements as may be required for the maintenance and operation of related facilities. Any assessments will be done on a benefit basis, as required by law. 4. The Developer of this subdivision of land shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of the final map, without the approval of the City Engineer. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the Applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: o City Fire Marshal o City of La Quinta Public Works Department o Planning & Development Department,Planning Division o Coachella Valley Water District o Desert Sands Unified School District o Imperial Irrigation District o Santa Rosa Cove Property Owner's Association Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above -mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building Division at the time of the application for a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. BJ/CONAPRVL.043 Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 6. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit or final inspection, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning and Development Director demonstrating compliance with those Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures of Tentative Tract No. 25237 and Environmental Assessment No. 89-146, which must: be satisfied prior to the issuance of the respective permit(s). The Planning and Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT(S) 7. The Applicant shall submit a grading plan that is prepared by a registered civil engineer who will be required to supervise the grading and drainage improvement construction and to certify that the constructed conditions at the rough grade stage are as per the approved plans and grading permit. This is required prior to final map approval. Certification at the final grade stage and verification of pad elevations is also required prior to final approval of grading construction. 8. A thorough preliminary engineering geological and soils engineering investigation shall be done and the report submitted for review along with the grading plan. The report's recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and/or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. 9. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department an interim landscape program for the entire tract, which shall be for the purpose of wind erosion and dust control. The land owner shall institute blowsand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a. The use of irrigation during any construction activities; b. Planting of cover crop or vegetation upon previously graded but undeveloped portions of the site; C. Provision of wind breaks or wind rows, fencing, and/or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The land owner shall comply with requirements of the Director of Public Works and. Planning and Development. All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent the emission of dust and blowsand. BJ/CONAPRVL.043 - 2 - J.'), 1 �9 Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 10. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a condition so as to prevent a dust and blowsand nuisance and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures as approved by the Planning and Development and Public Works Departments. 11. Drainage disposal facilities shall be provided as required by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of the City ]Master Plan of Drainage, including payment of any drainage fees required therewith. The design facilities shall be capable of handling a 100-year storm. 12. The Applicant shall design and install the required flood control facilities in accordance with the following requirements a. A hydrology study of the mountainous area adjacent to the tract shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer to determine what storm drain improvements are needed to protect the tract from storm water run-off produced by a 100-year storm. b. A positive storm drain system shall be installed that is capable of intercepting and conveying the 100-year storm water run-off from the mountainous area adjacent to the tract to a discharge area approved by the City Engineer. C. The intercept storm drain system shall be constructed in a common area lot that is part of the tract. d. The homeowner's association charged with maintaining the common areas in the tract shall also be responsible for maintaining the storm drain system, and said responsibility shall be so noted in the C.C. & R's. e. Storm water run-off produced by a 100-year storm that is attributable to areas within the tract shall be retained on site in a lake, a landscaped retention basin(s), or discharged to an off -site area as may be approved by the City Engineer. 13. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping, and irrigation plans to Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to CVWD's Water Management Program. These plans shall include the landscape and irrigation plans for all areas required to be landscaped. BJ/CONAP'RVL.043 - 3 Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 14. Applicant shall obtain adequate easements to allow any tributary off -site drainage through Lot N, subject to approval of the City Engineer. Easement shall stipulate Lot N specifically for drainage purposes and access for maintenance thereof only. TO TO FINAL MAP 15. Applicant shall comply with the following requirements of the Public Works Department: a. The Applicant shall dedicate all necessary street and utility easements as required by the City Engineer, including all corner cutbacks. b. The Applicant shall submit street improvement plans for all private street lots that are prepared by a registered civil engineer. Street improvements, including traffic signs and markings shall conform to City standards as determined by the City Engineer and adopted by the La Quinta Municipal Code (three-inch AC over four -inch. Class 2 Base minimum for residential streets). Improvement plans shall provide for the removal of the existing gate area cutout and appropriate transition improvements. 16. The Applicant shall construct the following street improvements to the requirements of the City Engineer and the La Quinta Municipal Code, as follows: a. That the Applicant shall construct street improvements for all private street lots (including Lot H and necessary transitions to Avenida Fernando), to the requirements of the City Engineer and the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). b. Primary access streets in the tract shall have horizontal curve radii that equal or exceed the 300-foot minimum required by the Subdivision Ordinance, except where a reduced radius is permitted by the City Engineer, the following conditions shall apply: 1). Applicant shall provide a minimum 4-foot sidewalk on inside of curve where radius has been reduced to get pedestrians out of the street. 2.) Applicant shall provide an adequate sight distance easement across portion of lot(s) on inside of curve where radius has been reduced. BJ/CONAPRVL.043 - 4 ' i1 Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 17. All utilities will be installed and trenches compacted to City standards prior to construction of any streets. The soils engineer shall provide the necessary compaction test reports for review by the City Engineer, as may be required. 18. Prior to transmittal of the final map to the City Council by the City Engineering Department., any existing structures which are to be removed from the property shall have been removed or there shall be an agreement for the removal which shall be secured by a faithful performance bond in a form satisfactory to the City and granting the City the right to cause any such structures to be removed. 19. All. separate lettered street lots shall be shown as such on the final map if separation of street segments is intended. 20. Lot: F shall be widened to a minimum width of 10-feet along the easterly boundary of Lot 41. West boundary of Lot: F at Lot 41 shall extend southwesterly and radial to northerly right-of-way of street Lot B, and be aligned with the common lot line of Lots 40 and 42. 21. Relocation of the existing guardhouse/gate on Fernando to it's location as shown on TT 25237 shall be reviewed at the plot plan level by the Planning and Development Department and Design Review Board. Plans shall also be transmitted for comments by the Santa Rosa Cove Homeowner's Association during the Planning and Development Department's review process. (See also Condition #29) 22. Lot I shall be improved as part of the internal circulatory street system to the requirements of the City Engineer and shall be included (re -lettered) as an extension of street Lot A 23. La Quinta Joint Venture shall obtain an easement from Landmark Land Company to allow encroachment of cul-de-sac at Lot K into their property, with the format subject to approval of the City Engineer. Adequate slope protection shall be maintained in a manner as required for the remaining tract areas. 24. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the CVWD. Any necessary parcels for District facility expansion shall be shown on the final map and conveyed to the CVWD, in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. 25. The Developer shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Fire Marshal prior to final map approval as applicable; BJ/CONAPRVL.043 - 5 - ,"J' J �12 Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 a. Schedule A fire protection approved Super fire hydrants, (6" X 4" X 2-1/2" X 2-1/211) shall be located at each street intersection. spaced not more than 330-feet apart in any direction with no portion of any frontage more than. 165-feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1750 gpm for 2-hours duration at 20 psi. b. Prior to recordation of the final map, Applicant/Developer shall furnish One blueline coy of the water system plans to the Fire Department fore review/approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." C. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. d. All streets having widths less than 36-feet shall be designated as fire lanes and marked with red curbing and signage as follows: 1.) North side of street Lot "K". 2.) East side of street Lot "L". 3.) South and west side of street Lot "M" 4.) Both sides of street Lot "I". PROJECT DEVELOPMENT/MANAGEMENT: 26. Pr.Lor to the recordation of the final map, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department the following documents which shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that the lakes and common areas, and private streets and drives, shall be maintained in accordance with the intent and purpose of this approval: a. The document to convey title; b. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions to be recorded; and, C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the unit/lot owners of this land division. The approved Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final subdivision map is recorded. BJ/CONAPRVL.043 - 6 - , / I V3 Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 A homeowner's association, with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be established and continuously maintained. The association shall have the right to lien the property of any owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust, provided that such deed of trust is made in good faith and. for value and is of record prior to the lien of the homeowner's association. 27. The! Applicant shall establish a Design Review Committee to review and approve all development within TT 25237. This Committee formation shall be reflected within the C.C. & R's for this tract. The main objectives of this Committee shall be as follows: a. Assure development compliance with Specific Plan 121-E and all applicable C.C. & R's., b. Determine that development with TT 25237 is compatible with existing and proposed development within Santa Rosa Cove in terms of architecture, mass, height and bulk of structures, and landscape design. d. Assure that the building architecture, building materials and colors of development within TT 25237 follows a consistent design theme which is in keeping with the balance of the Santa Rosa Cove project. 28. Applicant shall establish within the C.C. & R's site design standards appropriate to estate lots, including but not limited to, front, side and rear setbacks, lot coverage, etc. Standards shall be reviewed by the Planning and Development Department as part of its review of the C.C. & R's, but be no less restrictive than the R-2 Zone standards. Building height shall be limited to one story, not to exceed 17-feet from finished lot pad grade. 29. Applicant shall be responsible for the relocation of the existing Fernando gate and all appurtenant structures located on Avenida Fernando. Relocation shall be sited generally as shown on Exhibit "A" for TT 25237. Design and specific siting of the gates and guardhouse shall be reviewed as required by these conditions. The extent of this requirement is as follows: BJ/CONAPRVL.043 - 7 - '• i; -1 (fit . 1 Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 a. Relocation of existing Avenida Fernando gate/guardhouse as specified herein. Construction for this improvement shall be bonded and commence concurrently with transitional improvements for Lot H/Avenida Fernando, and shall be bonded for completion no later than December 31, 1990. Failure to complete the Avenida Fernando relocation by this date will result in forfeiture of the bond to the City, which shall retain the right to fully complete the approved installation(:;). b. Replacement/removal of existing gate area cutout for match -up with current street design of Avenida Fernando for unobstructed for east -west traffic flow in accordance with the approved street improvement plans. (See Condition #15) C. Installation of "Emergency Only" vehicular security gate with pedestrian and golf cart access only on Avenida Obregon near the southerly boundary of the La Quinta Hotel overflow parking lot (across from La Casa) to separate hotel and residential traffic. This installation shall be bonded for, and shall be completed no later than three months from the date of City Council approval of TT 25237. Failure to fulfill this requirement will result in forfeiture of the bond to the City, which shall retain the right to fully complete the installation. Until a plot plan approval and building permits for the above items have been obtained, no building permits for any units or common facilities within the tract shall be issued. TRACT DESIGN 30. Prior to any landscape installation, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department for review and approval a plan (or plans) showing the following: a. Landscaping, including plant types, sizes, spacing, location, and irrigation systems for all areas to be landscaped. Desert or native plant species and drought resistant planting material shall be incorporated into the landscape plan. b. Location and design detail of any proposed and/or required walls. BJ/CONAPRVL.043 - 8 - )'i J J _ Conditions of Approval -TT 25237 March 13, 1990 C. Exterior lighting plan, emphasizing minimization of light and glare impacts to surrounding properties. All lighting proposed and/or required for any aspect of development of TT 25237 shall be subject to compliance with La Quinta Municipal Code, Chapter 9.210, Outdoor Light Control.. 31. The appropriate Planning approval shall be secured prior to establishing any of the following uses: a. Temporary construction facilities. b. Sales facilities, including their appurtenant signage. C. On -site advertising/construction signs. 32. Provision shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Infrastructure Fee Program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. BJ/CONAP.RVL.043 - 9 - 19 6 PH-2 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: MARCH 13, 1990 CASE NO: STREET NAME CHANGE APPLICANT:. CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF STREET NAME CHANGES TO RENAME 50TH, 52ND, AND 54TH AVENUES TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE, FRANK CAPRA DRIVE, MERV GRIFFIN DRIVE AND/OR OTHER NAMES AS MAY BE DEEMED APPROPRIATE. BACKGROUND: In December, 1989, the City Council referred a request to rename 50th Avenue to Andy Williams Drive to the Planning Commission to set a date for Public Hearing. The Planning Commission considered the matter on January 9th, and again on January 23. At the second consideration this hearing was established and the name change consideration was expanded to include 52nd and 54th Avenue and the names Frank Capra Drive, Mery Griffin Drive and/or other names. Before and since the January 23rd consideration, petitions and letters pertaining to changing the street names have been received. These are attached for your consideration. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Municipal Code requires that the Planning Commission hear and consider proposals for and against the proposed street name changes and make any recommendation to the City Council it deems appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the street name changes as noted above, and by minute motion 90- recommend to the City Council name changes it deems appropriate. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Petitions and letters BJ/STAFFRPT.050 - 1 - � CITY OF 1A wilmi.. FEb cp 6R mkp February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of -Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It. is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, Lo celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. Tt, is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, ,% L/� Z- lit Sys ea wlyd 31rC o 5 ,Dye hiN410 g Dv�Bwm6Y, �< ur N3e3 JO N'Sr"'t TQ lu n ` N Y Q�� I cc V y V J'=z. ,.,... QF('J�J ��WZWI-7 QQ¢ZSD -c N¢ `� C¢ N< 0 Q�Q ¢ J W X0 O y W W¢ U WC :1W�`�O¢O�lm�r�r�� �¢"'OFHHLLc WZUp �LLWFNZz" Z2 aN O¢ 9zy isv�¢,yp Ym y1OOOOOO OZ�Y¢<<zz o$_��_ LL o555555 SSizi��cv U W W W LL Z Y �1 ¢ a rD y N s � y1O � ruwn ua zo Q w to 1+1 ¢ N< Oluw W la `0 �ONCC.Ng¢»>> Woa �355 5- -- }� OLL m wnJJ y ROwwww 0 Yw O2222 w YULL O Jnu UU _ Oz¢wOV r�A/� Z44wws�000O � VI QaDmmmV VUUUV ti \` QL O „'H _ _ — — _ _• rllNll ul: _ _ _ _• � � �hfr�� _s tl¢ OONOtl 311r0 a I I I I II III II I II (�♦0M� J� ft I D ``ll��jj ow LG rwArn ��.� N � 1 NOFONI{IStlM OF BANKTHE u uou, u.ocu nos 11. I,aurra Txxis CHAIRMAN OF THE OOAIID LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL Ladies and Gentlemen: We are supportive to the suggestion of renaming Avenue 50 to Andy Williams Drive. He has given of his talent and time to our community. I would not support any change in Avenue 52 or 54 as is proposed. I like Frank Capra, but he hasn't been supportive as has Andy Williams. b have no knowledge of anything Mery Griffin has done for La Quints other than building a house. H.Lauren Lewis 51-290 Avenidas Bermudas • Post Office Box 1627 • La Quints, California 92253 • (619)564-1857 J J a�1� ,J"e�Ac. BE IT RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY DECLARE THA Tyg FOLLOWING AVENUES BE CHANGED: RE�V AVENUE OLD NEW I144 YGV , n ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE AVENUE 52 AVENUE 54 TO FEANE FDRIVE MERV GRRIFFFIN DRIVE CITY OF LA QUINTA PUNNING 6 DEVELOPM.ENT DEPT. THESE THREE LA QUINTA RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEARS HAVE PROVEN TO BE STARS IN THE ENTERTAINMENT FIELD OF MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION, AND RECORDING INDUSTRIES. EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEY HAVE GIVEN OF THEIR OWN TIME AND EFFORTS TO HELP THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY IN CHARITABLE, CIVIC, AND CHURCH FUNCTIONS. TWO RAVE SERVED AS HONORARY MAYORS OF LA QUINTA. THEIR WORLD-WIDE REPUTATIONS WILL GIVE LA QUINTA ADDED PUBLICITY THE WORLD OVER. ALL THREE GENTLEMEN HAVE BEEN LOVERS OF GOLF AND TENNIS. AS OF NOVENBER 15, IM, ALL THREE STREETS RAVE NOT BEEN DENSELY POPULATED SO THAT THE CHANGE WILL BE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE CITY FATHERS APPROVAL. , WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT NOW IS THE TIME FOR THIS ACTION AS INDICATED BY OUR SIGNATURES BELOW- NA D WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR CONCURRENCE. DATE SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. 15 HE & 21 r J .I. 0 2U' BE IT RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE FOLLOWING AVENUES BE CHANGED$ OLD NEW AVENUE 50 TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE R�C�rlsr AVENUE 52 TO FRANK CAPRA DRIVE VC AVENUE 54 TO MERV GRIFFIN DRIVE C � PTO THESE THREE LA QUINTA RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEARS iR Be STARS IN THE ENTERTAINMENT FIELD OF MOTION PICTURES, T (//JNjq RECORDING INDUSTRIES. EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEY HAVE GIVE pdd IR OWN TIME AND EFFORTS TO HELP THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY IN CHARITABL , CIVIC, AND CHURCH FUNCTIONS. TWO RAVE SERVED AS HONORARY MAYORS OF LA QUINTA. THEIR WORLD—WIDE REPUTATIONS WILL GIVE LA QUINTA ADDED PUBLICITY THE WORLD OVER. ALL THREE GENTLEMEN HAVE BEEN LOVERS OF GOLF AND TENNIS. AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 1989, ALL THREE STREETS HAVE NOT BEEN DENSELY POPULATED SO THAT THE CHANGE WILL BE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE CITY FATHERS APPROVAL, WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT NOW IS THE TIME FOR THIS ACTION AS INDICATED BY OUR SIGNATURES BELOW AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR CONCURRENCE. DATE SIGNATURE ADDRES PHONE NO. �� 89 a 9a 0 Rho k t 1D `f a-Sw 3ti3S5 AuG Aep,)dcl_X Sby 3ao9 /, Jf A, //-d7-89 63S L�ttL6,�grQ d°�. O&y-376/ BE IT RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE -UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE FOLLOWING AVENUES BE CHANGED= OLD .; NEW "leR 'tf AVENUE 50 TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE l•��r`� AVENUE 52 TO FRANK CAPRA DRIVE AVENUE 56 - TO - MERV GRIFFIN DRIVE p�`C�,/,jv ` THESE THREE LA QUINTA RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEARS OF H/A*vtRO (1�O STARS IN THE ENTERTAINMENT FIELD OF MOTION PICTURES, TRLSVIS P.fp� RECORDING INDUSTRIES. EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEY HAVE GIVEN OF THLIg OWN TIME AND EFFORTS TO HELP THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY IN CHARITABLE, CIVIC, AND CHURCH FUNCTIONS. TWO HAVE SERVED AS HONORARY MAYORS OF LA QUINTA. THEIR WORLD-WIDE REPUTATIONS WILL GIVE LA QUINTA ADDED PUBLICITY THE WORLD OVER. ALL THREE GENTLEMEN HAVE BEEN LOVERS OF GOLF AND TENNIS. AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 1989, ALL THREE STREETS HAVE NOT BEEN DENSELY POPULATED SO THAT THE CHANGE WILL BE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE CITY FATHERS APPROVAL. WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT NOW I8 THE TIME FOR THIS ACTION AS INDICATED .._ : BY OUR SIGNATURES BELOW XND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR CONCURRRNCB. DATE SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO, ,TDid� Ifty�N . 1 r yertioo BE IT RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE FOLLOWING AVENUES BE CHANGED= OLD NEW AVENUE 50 TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE AVENUE 52 TO FRANK CAPRA DRIVE 0. AVENUE 51 TO MERV GRIFFIN DRIVEhm Qf LA THESE THREE LA QUINTA RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEARS HAVE PROVBipP(/��,�I�y STARS IN THE ENTERTAINMENT FIELD OF MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION, 71170!07 RECORDING INDUSTRIES. EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEY HAVE GIVEN OF THEIR OWN TIME AND EFFORTS TO HELP THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY IN CHARITABLE, CIVIC, AND CHURCH FUNCTIONS. TWO HAVE SERVED AS HONORARY MAYORS OF LA QUINTA. THEIR WORLD—WIDE REPUTATIONS WILL GIVE LA QUINTA ADDED PUBLICITY THE WORLD OVER. ALL THREE GENTLEMEN HAVE BEEN LAVERS OF GOLF AND TENNIS. AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 1989, ALL THREE STREETS HAVE NOT BEEN DENSELY POPULATED SO THAT THE CHANGE WILL BE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE CITY FATHERS APPROVAL. WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT NOW IS THE TIME FOR THIS ACTION AS INDICATED BY OUR SIGNATURES BELOW —AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR CONCURRENCE. DATE SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO, yd. z o; y%% s3• ,9✓e�al+ fu vRe z,. s `y - V2 a 3 11-2o-g°l z-s3D av�2¢o svy- � P 100t omi b- - lW.2o 44 S3-710 Q.e..,L+ �..+y S(p 2-/S ii /qs/11 5Z Y— /o yi or fleUtivit, R p!' BE IT RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY DECLARE �Fr1A'ls` 6re FOLLOWING AVENUES BE CHANGED: *! OLD NEW PUNTy W- �9(] AVENUE 50 TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE MINCdpf�.lfp(l� Iq AVENUE 52 TO FRANK CAPRA DRIVE AVENUE 54 TO MERV GRIFFIN DRIVE PI. THESE THREE LA QUINTA RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEARS HAVE PROVEN TO BE STARS IN THE ENTERTAINMENT FIELD OF MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION, AND RECORDING INDUSTRIES. EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEY HAVE GIVEN OF THEIR OWN TIME AND EFFORTS TO HELP THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY IN CHARITABLE, CIVIC, AND CHURCH FUNCTIONS. TWO HAVE SERVED AS HONORARY MAYORS OF LA QUINTA. THEIR WORLD-WIDE REPUTATIONS WILL GIVE LA QUINTA ADDED PUBLICITY THE WORLD OVER. ALL THREE GENTLEMEN HAVE BEEN LOVERS OF GOLF AND TENNIS. AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 1909, ALL THREE STREETS HAVE POT BEEN DENSELY POPULATED SO THAT THE CHANGE WILL BE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE CITY FATHERS APPROVAL. WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT NOW IS THE TIME FOR THIS ACTION AS INDICATED BY OUR SIG14ATURES BELOW AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR CONCURRENCE. DATE SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. TcybyC.Ja !E' a1y it -,pt '!� a1.�gr.✓N+k ,.. i�SL'_< . <`r.Td1.:2C�-= `'�,dq �i'� /n- )n-. (iE Y„' (J N SzYf•Fj 51)1 'V/zy' L ,�etitio�, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY DE ENE FOLLOWING AVENUES BE CHANGEDt VED OLD NEW AVENUE 50 TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE CITE 1090 AVENUE 52 TO AVENUE 54 TO MERV GRIFFIN CAPRA DDRIVE RIVE PWhhlhG 6 LA QE�ry�. THESE THREE LA QUINTA RESIDENTS OVER THE PAST YEARS HAVE PROVEN TO BE STARS IN THE ENTERTAINMENT FIELD OF MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION, AND RECORDING INDUSTRIES. EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEY HAVE GIVEN OF THEIR OWN TIME AND EFFORTS TO HELP THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY IN CHARITABLE, CIVIC, AND CHURCH FUNCTIONS. TWO HAVE SERVED AS HONORARY MAYORS OF LA QUINTA. THEIR WORLD-WIDE REPUTATIONS WILL GIVE LA QUINTA ADDED PUBLICITY THE WORLD OVER. ALL THREE GENTLEMEN HAVE BEEN LOVERS OF GOLF AND TENNIS. AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 1989, ALL THREE STREETS HAVE NOT BEEN DENSELY POPULATED SO THAT THE CHANGE WILL BE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE CITY FATHERS APPROVAL. WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT NOW IS THE TIME FOR THIS ACTION AS INDICATED BY OUR SIGNATURES BELOW -AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR CONCURRENCE. DATE\ 1S�IGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. Il'14,IIG T... 4�w 40 _e un \%. _.... l_ •l w.• e...- /, iJ3 t/V � e � �a Ca 3_ f I� December 14,1989 Mayor John Pena City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quints, Ca. 92253 Dear Mayor Pena, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor, Mr, Andy Williams. Andy has been a tireless supporter of our community since the late 1950's and is now working with both the Boys and Girls Club of La Quints, and the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the gem of the desert, to celebrity status. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. _ Sincerely, Mark Simon 'The Home of Personal Service" P. O. Box 1461, 78-611 Highway 1 11, La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 346-2345:.-: RESOLUTION NO. 90-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION TO RECOMMEND THE RENAMING OF A STREET IN LA QUINTA TO "ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE" BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of La Quints Arts Foundetto endorses and is in support of renaming a street in La Quint& to "And Williams" Drive in recognition of the contributions that Andy Williams he made to the City of La Quints and to the Coachella Valley. ADOPTED this nineth day of January. 1990. AYES: 16 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 ATTEST: By AJ /L�:er�Gtl.Ql, �JZG4'.G�(.hIZ ohna Davis, President t l / Off: � D' � By A— arga et Ro ertson Exec eve Director By lf''�' �kw ze Nancy/Marks. Secretary CC ' January 16. 1990 Mayor John Pena Honorable Members of the City Council Post Office Boa 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council, The Board of La Quinta Arts Foundation is in support of renaming a street in the City of La Quinta to "Andv Williams Drive". Andy Williams is a well-known and prestigious entertainer and citizen of our city and we think it appropriate a city street bear his name. We have enclosed a resolution of support from our Board of Directors. Please consider this resolution in your deliberation of this issue. Yours truly. LA QU'INTA /ARTS FOUNDATION /Meg R bertson (Execu ive Director MR/tg ( Enclosure POST OFFICE BOX 777 9 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 • (619)564.1244 CITTV Of LA QUINTA FEB•?3i990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. Tt Is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, 1 2! 2 4a0ftCHAMBER OF COMMERCE 31 OF THE OESERT . r+ommeasuorFFR :� i9so Steve Brummel CITY OF LA QUINTA 2' l Qv l-PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPI• i 1, sv �e s� ,4,)� February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and -the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, CROftoWWA F t 8 "_' 1990 "V II ,,U11UIw February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. Tt is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, 7L A17-64 lob. 21� CITY QF LA GMA FEB 19 990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quints Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the celebrity status and honor a man who has given so City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Boulevard. Sincerely, 77 7sz' �v Desert, to much to our Andy Williams CITY OF LA UNTA rrC ! , !4",1 CITY MANAGER February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising -for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, I fir) L- , CITY OF LA OUWA FEB 13 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. it is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, Quinta, the Gem of the Desert., to a man who has given so much to our dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams CITY OF LA OwNiA h t 8 1.; 199U February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. Tt is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, CITY OF LA 9UIVA CIO MANAGER February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 98-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, _ and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for.the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. /Sincerely Quinta, the Gem of the a man who has given so dedicate Avenue 50 as Desert, to much to our Andy Williams M ULA 91UMiA FEB 13 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, / CITY OF lA QUIUA htd February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sinceroy, Itkv- C� st -" 363 CITY OF LA BUIRA rt8 i J -au!) February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta .Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, ( ' �2 f I , _ 4 2?3 CITY OF IA QUWA FEB i 3 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt is time celebrity City. Tt Boulevard. Sincerely, to raise our La status and honor is time for us to Quints, the Gem of the a man who has given so dedicate Avenue 50 as Desert, to much to our Andy Williams CITY OF LA OUIUA FEB ? I ,qq1 CU MARAGER February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF' LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, :1z5 CITY OF to OURITA CU MANAGER February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and lonorary 3oard Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys 3 Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor city. It is time for us to T30ulevard. Sincerely, Quinta, the Gem or the Desert, to a man who has given so much to our dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams a v. 91 J 6 6 CITY OF to GtWA FEB .''q 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of Lhe Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to a man who has given so much to our dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams a February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue! 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy Etas been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys &. Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. �� Qg�AXI�IL Sinc rely, CROFLAGtWA FED -'� "'411 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quints Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, Quints, the Gem of the a man who has given so dedicate Avenue 50 as I J�� ✓ nt�7Po , Desert, to much to our Andy Williams 6. J MY OF LAOUIWiA F r ti ; :1 i990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor.Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, CITY Of to eumm C11Y AM M February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta arts Foundation. It is time celebrity City. It Boulevard. Sincerely, (/)L to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to status and honor a man who has given so much to our is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams XCC.���i"�� 1 1. f cm OFLAWMA FEB 1') R90 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 98-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt; is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the celebrity status and honor a man who has given so City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Boulevard. Sincerely, Q�eo Desert, to much to our Andy Williams 91 , CRY OF LA QUWA FEB ? I iggn February G, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: 1 would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. T', is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. Tt is time for us to 3oulevard. Sincerely, Hr -W Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to a man who has ;riven so much to our dedicate Avenue .50 as sandy 1,iI1iams CRY OF to GUID f t b _1 A :;..i February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY 017 LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. it is 'time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as ndy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, 1 CITY OF LA NWA February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys do Giris Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. it is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, L. COY OFLA GMA ;990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, ) 6c6c yz ftc ?S FF B 1 s 1qqn C0000 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, Q"' `"L' CRY OF toOUWA FEB 111990 FebruELry 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, I 2 3" CITY Of !A OUWA FEB 11 iaQn February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. R09 #A Sincerely, r v,� 9V711 2 ;1 9 CITY OFtAOUWA CRUANAGM February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, p,4 9a7.r3 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta-Arts Foundation. It is 'time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, j, 3 7 �u 1�1 CRY OF to VAWA FEB ? ^ ,qqn &=' February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for- the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time celebrity City. It Boulevard. Sii to raise our La status and honor is time for us to 'D, ,66-� 773 Quinta, the Gem of a man who has given dedicate Avenue 50 the Desert, to so much to our as Andy Williams 9 CITY OFLA WWA r,' d .' 1441) February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. - It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the celebrity status and honor a man who has given so City. It is time for us to dedicate .Avenue 50 as Boulevard. Sincerely, iw / e let 77', iij62L=n«L�Ci .-; �7 ,01 Desert, to much to our Andy Williams E. j My OF 1A GWA February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue! 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member, of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary_ Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, box /a /0 Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to a man who has given so much to our dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams 1 }� W1 OF LA QUWA February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, %1lC •�. Me tl� etc t Y ,}lGac . LGCL'< b 2`r5 qTr OF(A 4WA February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105, Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy hiss been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time celebrity City. It Boulevard. Sincer�, to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to status and honor a man who has given so much to our is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams eRLAV-39-& lv %S Le' in / j < V 1�0 UTY OF LA UUIVA CRIG 4UGER February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quits, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, CITY OF LA GUWA FHB ? :' '-qQ1 l February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts - Foundation. It is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, C" Quinta, the Gem of the a man who has given so dedicate Avenue 50 as Desert, to much to our Andy Williams CITYOFLA A t 't d . "'V W, I CP MANAGER February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, r CITY OF LA WWA CITY MANAGER February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys 3. Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It Is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, l 77 --7So e"%-c So �ct. PU'"hc 9�as3 CR OF LA BUTAITA M February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quits, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and -the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, t CITY OF LA OUIKA r L 8 ' :? i990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quints, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, 0 l/R�tI�Z 044, 14 `^ CITY OF LA AMA FEB 13 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quanta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Tt: is time celebrity City. Tt Boulevard. to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to status and honor a man who has given so much to our is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams 7$ - 9,1)3 CITY Of LA ONTA r t B 13 i990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, VJ --, �J CITY OF LA allINTA rtd 1') 1*u February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and -the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quints, Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, -, '7S 95z February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quanta, CA 92253 Clir OF to aUWA r t is 1 j 1990 aw MANAGER Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is Lime to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to a man who has given so much to our dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams CITY OF LA QUWA FtB I � 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, i �J 7 CITY Of LA OUWA FEB 131990 m February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts _ Foundation. It, is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of celebrity status and honor a man who has given City. It, is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 Boulevard. Since ely, the Desert, t.o so much to our as Andy- Williams GW OF!AWMA FEB 131990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY 017 LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, r J &M OF LA GWNTA FEB 131990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the celebrity status and honor a man who has given so City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Boulevard. Sincerely, Desert, to much to our Andy Williams CITY OF 1A QUWA r t a 13 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. IL is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, h)yaol_� 7n - /L' a February- 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quanta, CA 92253 CRi' OF LA GMA ftH1j1990 F Dear Mayor, Council '.Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman -of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. 1t, is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, Quinta, the Gem of the a man who has `given so dedicate Averyue 50 as i/ Desert, to much to our Andy Williams �632 s C11M�0 O/1l�N p,2 GA 1Q e,4- 0),(j 52 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 cm OF LA BI WiA FEB 13 1990 inn Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the celebrity status and honor a man who has given so City. Tt is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Boulevard. Sincerely, cuK �� L6� zt l ma — Desert, to much to our Andy Williams 9u? CITY OF LA BIWA FEB 131990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys 8. Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. p XSincer'lly��/��v� Quinta, the Gem of the a man who has given so dedicate Avenue 50 as G L /LfW Desert, to much to our Andy Williams CRY OF LA QUWA t t b 1 j 1990 r n: February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quanta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the celebrity status and honor a man who has given so City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Boulevard. Sincerely, .�l 4�- love- ralt-Y e( Desert, to much to our Andy k'illiams CITY OF to QIWA F t B 1 j 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of celebrity status and honor a man who has given City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 Boulevard. Sincerely, the Desert, to so much to our as Andy Williams C(TY OF LA OUWA r t d 1 ;i 194U February 6, 1990 CRYMAHAGER Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is Lime to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert., to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, 9 ••U i CITY OF LA BIWA FES Ili 1990 February 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of -Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La celebrity status and honor City. It is time for us to Boulevard. Sincerely, 17 fir_ �ctiu^.t 4- CL� Quinta, the Gem of the a man who has given so dedicate Avenue 50 as Desert, to much to our Andy Williams February G, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-105 Calle Estado P.O. Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 CRYOIFlANWA FEB11990 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys & Girls Club of La Quints, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quints Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, !.he Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, �Q,, 4D_ __ j(q Jo LSF AUTOS 80-975 INDIO BLVD., #4 INDIO, CALIF. 92201 CI[+f OF IAA FEB 121990 cmr WMAW Today's Date o:2-q-2;0 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners Cuty of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commisioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename either Avenue 50 or Avenue 54 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community.. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys 8 Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quint Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 or Avenue 54 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, / C In / ,;�/r/vAVi/tiCr� SAu/+ cRA EDWARDJ Z?.JWLEY �ESiCE NT CR ofLA IRA FEB l 3 Mil 10 February 1990 The Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners The City Of La Quints. 78-105 Calle Estado La Quints/ California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members and Planning Commissioners/ As the first President of the La Quinta Country Club, from 1959 to 1969, I was privileged to see our club blossom from the vision of three men: Roy Crummer, Jr.; John Elsbach and Leonard Ettelson into the glorious country club it now is. My friendship with Andy Williams goes back many years, and I encouraged him to build a house with me on The Islands, off to the right of the ninth fair- way, in 1966 - a house that he still lives in and now considers his permanent residence. He helped me in the early years to spread the word about our club to his celebrity friends in Los Angeles, and especially those at the Bel -Air Country Club where he's been a member since 1961. He's a stand-up guy, a credit to his profession, an international star of the first magnitude - and I can think of no one more deserving of having a La Quinta avenue named in his honor than that of Andy Williams. Sincerely, 4200 PALM CANYON DRIVE EAST C PALM SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA 92262 - TELEPHONE (714) 328-1171 February 26, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. sincerely, P C. eo 8 Cn'Y OF lA WMA MAR - 619M February 26, 1990 CO MAWM Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. i sincere�g; E. Wmkeft P.O. Bpi 1398 La Quints CA 92253 2.13 February 26, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 CITY CFIA NWA MAR - 9 WO Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our to celebrity status and to our City. It is time Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, honor a man who has given so much for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as dames P. Peltier P. m. Box 48 48751 S mta UremWa La quintal CA :.=z;3 ij,-FE 9LOK ANWE. SEN OO BOX M9 .1902'- CEOROS CIRCLE 1 QUINTA CA 922'4'' February 26, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 PLC a zi MY OF LASMA MAR - 61990 OYMOM Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename: Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, 9 CR OFIA SWA MAR - R 1990 February 26, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. it is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. sincerely, ry -k �Q;ti. l L - pill OF LASWA MAR - 61990 February 26, 1990 L_.11Lu�i:�riil Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts -Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, cal mot' " STA"!IJ. BURROUGHS Pu POUGHS CIRCLE 92252 LA 4 17 CRY Of to NWA MAR - A 1qan February 26, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. sincerely, CITY OF LA QUWA CRY OF(A VAWO MAR -A 1990 February 26, 1990 CONUAGgi Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename. Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. sincerely, C�v77�r CITY OF LA AUWA MAR - R 1990 February 26, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club -of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, r, -- -- - /�� Planning Commission City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Commission Members: PATRICIA (CORKY) UPSON 6upervi&or. Fourth DiBtrict COUNTY OF RIVERSmE March 2, 1990 RED IVA 1) MIAR 0 �rj 1990 CITY UF= LA QuiiVTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMEV DEPT. It has come to my attention that the City of La Quinta is considering renaming one of the east -west streets "Andy Williams Drive." I can certainly understand the City's desire to recognize the contributions of Mr. Williams to the community, and personally have no objection to honoring him in this manner although any such request will have to be approved by the full Board of Supervisors. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there is anything I can do to assist in bringing this matter before the Board, if you should wish to do so. cc: Sincerely, l�s PATRICIA A. ]ARSON Mark D. Simon, Simon Motors District Office: 46209 Oasis 8lreel. P.O. Draver 1330, Indio. California 92202. (619) 342-8211. (619) 345-1072 Clones M. C6ietie 49025 CEDROS CIRCLE CROFLAGWA POST OFFICE BOX 30 LA OUINTA. CALIFORNIA 92253 MAR -6 WO MUM February 26, 1990 Honorable Mayor John Pena City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of our community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fund-raising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise our La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert, to celebrity status and honor a man who has given so much to our City. It is time for us to dedicate Avenue 50 as Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, i 2�7 RICHARD BLISS NELSON • ARCHITECT A • I • A 78565 YAVAPA•INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA 92210•(619) 345-3500•(FAX: 619-345.0124) 1482 E. VALLEYROAD•SUITE B-215•SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93108•(805) 969.6963 to CRY OF LA GMA 28 February 1990 MAR - 19M Honorable Mayor John Pena CWMARM City Council Members Planning Commissioners City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta,, CA 92253 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commisioners: I would lake to express my support for the effort to rename Avenue 50, 52, or Avenue 54 after your Honorary 'Mayor Mr. Andy Williams. Andy has been a resident since the late 50's and a tireless supporter of La Quinta community. He is a founder and Honorary Board Member of the Joseph Marguleas Boys 6 Girls Club of La Quinta, and the Honorary Chairman of Fundraising for the La Quinta Arts Foundation. It is time to raise La Quinta, the Gem status and honor a man who has given so time for us to dedicate Avenue 50, 52, Boulevard. - RICHARD BLISS NELSON ARCHITECT AIA of the Desert, to celebrity much to this City. It is or Avenue 54 as Andy Williams :.` 1, TELEPHONE and FAX: 619/564.6074 Honorable Mayor John City Council Members Plannir.Lg Commission City of LaQuinta 78-105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, California Dear Folks: PHILIP E. SWIFT P. O. BOX 1200 LaQUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Pena 92253 CRORAWWA MAR - 6 Wo March 3, 1990 Please accept my support for the movement to rename Avenue 50 after our Honorary Mayor, Mr. Andy.Wi.11iams. As a second door neighbor in The Islands at LaQuinta Country Club, I have been acquainted with Mr. Williams for 15 years. Through all of that period I have admired him as an excellent neighbor and an enthusiastic supporter of sound community events. As you know he is a founder and honorary board member of the Boys and Girls Club of LaQuinta and he also serves as the Honorary Chairman of Fund Raising for the LaQuinta Arts Foundation. In my opinion it is entirely timely to honor a man who has given so much to our community. I would ask your support in changing the name of Avenue 50 to Andy Williams Boulevard. Sincerely, /�� Phili E. Swi t 9, 4