1991 06 05 DRBDESIGN REVIEW BOARD
A Regular Meeting to be held at the
La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California
Juno 5 , 1991
5:30 P-M-
I. CALL TO ORDER - Flag Salute
II. ROLL CALL
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes of May 1, 1991
IV. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Public Use Permit 91-009; a request of Desert Baptist Church for
construction of an 11,654 square foot church facility at the northeast
corner of Miles Avenue and Adams Street.
B. Tentative Tract 26524 & Parcel Map 26525, The Orchard; a request of
Chuck Strother for a variance for a wall higher than six feet on the
south side of 50th Avenue west of Jefferson Street.
C. Plot Plan 91-464; a request of Villa La Quinta Homeowner's Association
for approval of a guard gate house and monument sign on the north side
of 50th Avenue at Avila.
D. Street Name Signs for the Village; consideration of street name signs
for Village Specific Plan area.
V. OTHER
A. City Entry Sign; status report on City entry signs.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
0 Ci
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CITY OF LA QiJINTA
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-105 Calle Estado, La Quints, California
May 1, 1991 5:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Chairman Rice brought the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. and
Boardmember Llewellyn led the flag salute. Chairman Rice asked for a
roll call.
II. ROLL CALL
A. Present: Boardmembers David Harbison, John Walling, Ted Llewellyn,
Planning Commission Representative Elly Dowd, and Chairman Rice.
B. Absent: Boardmembers Paul Anderson and Michael Platt
C. It was moved by Boardmember Llewellyn and seconded by Chairman Rice
to excuse Boardmember Anderson. Unanimously approved.
D. Staff Present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa and Department Secretary
Betty Anthony.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Chairman Rice moved to approve the Minutes of April 3, 1990, as
submitted. Commissioner Llewellyn seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
IV. BUSINESS SESSION:
A. Plot Plan 91-460; a request of Shell Oil for approval of a service station
and car wash located at the northwest corner of Highway 111 and Adams
Street within the 111 La Quinta Center.
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and
Development Department.
DRBMIN-5/1
1
DRBMIN-5/1
2. Boardmember Walling inquired if Staff knew anything of the plant
"Golden Eye" called for on the drawings. Principal Planner Sawa
stated he did not. Boardmember Harbison stated he had not
heard of it either.
3. Chairman Rice asked if this was the area that had a very high
elevation. Principal Planner Sawa stated it did have a high
elevation at this location. Discussion followed as to the proposed
grading proposed.
4. Mr. Dave Prest, Uruttia Architects, addressed the Board
regarding the landscaping and grading plans for the project. He
stated that at present the grading plans had not been completed
and would be done in relation to the entire project.
5. Discussion followed regarding the entrance to the car wash and
whether additional landscaping or screening would be needed to
hide the entrance and exit from the street frontage.
Boardmember Walling asked if the arches on the south end were
open. The Applicant stated they were and are provided for
architectural treatment.
6. Commissioner Dowd inquired if Mesquite trees would be used in
the landscaping design. Boardmember Harbison stated they
would be a good choice if height were needed. Discussion
followed as to the difficulty of determining how much landscaping
was needed without knowing how the property would be graded.
7. Boardmember Llewellen asked that the trash enclosure be painted
the same color as the building.
8. The Applicant asked that they be allowed to use landscaping for
screening to the entrance and exit to the car wash. Also they
would prefer to use one color (the darker stucco color submitted)
for the structure. Discussion followed as to the use of colors and
the maintenance. Following the discussion there was a consensus
of the Boardmembers that one color be allowed.
There being no further discussion it was moved by Boardmember
Harbison and seconded by Boardmember Walling to adopt Minute
Motion 91-006 recommending to the Planning Commission approval
of Plot Plan 91-460, subject to the following conditions:
a. Additional landscaping materials appropriate to screen the
car wash entry and exit shall be provided on the landscape
plan. Final acceptance of the screening shall be subject to
field inspection at the time of completion of the work.
Additional landscaping may be required at that time.
., , (I ( 3,
b. The color of the building may be a darker stucco color
which is approved for the shopping center.
C. Trash enclosure shall match exterior of building.
d. Sign program shall be submitted for approval by the
Design Review Board prior to issuance of a building
permit. Any required sign adjustments for number,
location, or size of signs shall be approved by the City
prior to approval of sign program by the Design Review
Board.
e. Landscaping plan approved for site shall be reviewed and
accepted by shopping center owner. Concept along
perimeter shall be extended along entire length of Highway
111, Adams Street, and Washington Street.
The screen wall along Adams Street shall be extended to
drip line or end of branches for the closest Sonoran Palo
Verde, as approved by the City. Height and length of
screen wall along Highway 111 shall be determined when a
final grading plan and landscaping plan is available to
ensure that the pump island area is screened from view of
traffic on Highway 111.
10. Mr. Don Adolf, Service Engineer for Shell Oil, addressed the
Board as a resident of PGA West, La Quinta, regarding his
concerns about the color of the shopping center buildings. He
wanted to be sure they would not be "pink" buildings.
Boardmember Llewellyn reassured Mr. Adolf that the building
would be the color of PGA West and not "pink". He also wanted
to inform the Board that this station was to be owned and
operated by Shell Oil and would not be a franchise and therefore
be a highly maintained.
V. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Boardmember Walling and seconded by Boardmember Llewellyn to
adjourn to a regular meeting of the Design Review Board on June 5, 1991, at 5:30
P.M. This meeting of the La Quinta Design Review Board was adjourned at 6:00
P.M., May 1, 1991.
DRBMIN-5/1
DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
ARCHITECT:
LOCATION:
BACKGROUND:
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
JUNE 5, 1991
PUBLIC USE PERMIT 91-009; PROPOSED CHURCH WITH
ASSOCIATED PARKING IN THE R-1-12,000/PD ZONE
DESERT BAPTIST CHURCH, PASTOR KOROLOK
JACK CULVER
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ADAMS STREET AND MILES AVENUE
Single family residential subdivision projects have been approved to the
north, south, and southwest of this site. An existing church is located
opposite the subject site, across Adams Street to the west.
A Public Use Permit (PUP) allows a church to be located in a residential area.
The PUP will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of July
9, 1991.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The church building is hexagonal in shape and comprises a central assembly
room with surrounding offices and classrooms. The central area of the church
roof has been elevated to allow for windows to light the central assembly area.
A metal rod extending above the roof located in a central elevated position
provides a visual focus to the building.
The contemporary style building will have dusty pink/peach concrete tile,
pale dusty pink accent features and cream colored stucco on the main body of
the structure.
The preliminary landscape plan shows a number of trees suitable for desert
climate located around the parking area and alongside Miles Avenue and Adams
Street. Shrubs, ground cover and areas of annual color have also been used.
Lawn covers the balance of the open area on the site.
A monument sign has been proposed on the corner of Miles Avenue and Adams
Street. The sign will consist of "stand off" letters applied to the face of a
stuccoed section of the wall (see Attachment #8)
STAFF COMMENTS:
The church building seems to be well designed and the proposed architectural
style and materials used are in keeping with the existing and proposed
buildings in the surrounding neighborhood.
DRBST.003
AV
Q
2. The amount of lawn area utilized should be reduced. A wildflower mix could
be used in the area where the expansion building is proposed. Emitters and
bubblers should be utilized between the street curb and meandering sidewalk.
3. The sign application complies with the La Quinta Sign Regulations.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review plans in conjunction with Staff comments and determine acceptability.
Attachments:
1.
Locality plan
2.
Plot plan
3.
Grading plan
4.
Landscaping plan
5.
Elevations
6.
Building sections
7.
Floor plans
8.
Proposed sign
9.
Surrounding area
DRBST.003
2
• :; . 1 1 LIB '1
ATTACHMENT No. 2
i
� w
\\ H
{t�j '01 � 6Wi1 W
f aw
MT
111 �I r W®_II�iP!
I �
3
y V
Iie
i� I IJ y
�- oF--4-->_<r,.�
ATTACHMENT No. 3 �.
W s
v
o
y 0
W
Q
s
rx
n
I
A TT A e%l 19 A' No. 4 -
W
H
9 R
�Ut
P. 4
121A
j
i
ZO 1
i
a
O ca
.
y. Z ..
Z
Ua
n
I1'
GED
ATTACHMENT No. 5
d
m
A�
Zao
r�
Q
Z
ATTACHMENT No. 6
F-
U
W
N
✓,,
ATTACHMENT
.J
i9
025
No
H
p 3
t
ATTACHMENT No. 8
e r
r
i
1
V;
ILI-
ATTACHMENT No. 9 t
IT,'�:_ nl
I/ti
ti
I
J
thy
i
41
- - �- 1 -
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: JUNE 5, 1991
PROJECT: VARIANCE 91-015 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 26524,
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 26525 - THE ORCHARD;
REQUEST FOR PERIMETER WALL EXCEEDING SIX FEET
IN HEIGHT
APPLICANT: CHUCK STROTHER
REPRESENTATIVE: THE HOLT GROUP
LOCATION: SOUTH OF 50TH AVENUE, BETWEEN PARK AVENUE &
JEFFERSON STREET (SEE ATTACHMENT #1)
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract 26524 comprises 44 custom single family lots
plus one well site on a total of 38 acres. Tentative Parcel
Map 26525 is a parcel map with three residential lots on 4
acres. Tentative Tract 26524 and Tentative Parcel Map 26525
were approved by the La Quinta City Council on December 18,
1990 and January 15, 1991 respectively.
Both of these projects share entries and have private streets
and will have Homeowner's Associations to maintain common
areas. The Applicant intends to retain as many of the existing
citrus trees as possible. The existing row of Date Palm trees
along the entry street will also be retained and utilized as
part of the entry landscape design.
BACKGROUND TO VARIANCE PROPOSAL:
1. Section 9.204 020 of the La Quinta Planning and Zoning
Regulations states that walls along property lines shall
not exceed six feet in height.
2. The noise study for this project requires a 7.5 foot high
perimeter sound wall along 50th Avenue and a northern
section of Orchard Lane and the access lane east of the
Coachella Valley Water District site (see Attachment
#2). The height of the wall is measured from the top of
the street curb to the top of the wall.
3. Normally if a sound study requires a sound barrier higher
than six feet, an earth berm plus a six foot high wall
are designed and constructed together achieving the
desired barrier height.
.1J , �) u
DR56/5.GL/CS -1
4. The applicant wishes to retain the existing citrus trees
on Tentative Tract 26524. If a berm is built this could
harm the existing trees alongside the future wall due to
the grade differential. Therefore the Applicant has
requested a variance to allow a wall higher than 6 feet
along 50th Avenue.
PROPOSAL:
A) Wall along 50th Avenue:
The proposed wall is approximately 7.5 feet above top of
curb on 50th Avenue. This complies with the noise
study. The height of the wall measured from the base of
the wall varies from 7.0' to 9.64'. The more extreme
cases occur where there is a retention basin between 50th
Avenue and the property boundary. The wall needs to
reach 9.64 feet in height measured from the base of the
wall to comply with the 7.5 feet height requirement
measured from top of curb.
B) Wall along Orchard Lane:
The height of the wall along Orchard Lane will vary
between 5.47' to 6.17' measured from both base of wall
and top of curb.
C) Construction materials/color:
The proposed wall will have a dove grey plaster finish
with a grey brick cap. Attachment #7 shows additional
gate and column treatment used on Orchard Lane only.
Raised planters are provide at three points along the
wall.
Six columns are provided as part of the perimeter wall
design on each side of the entry area into Orchard Lane
(see Attachment #7). The same design feature is used for
the perimeter wall surrounding the guard house area.
STAFF COMMENTS:
1. In addition to existing trees and proposed wall planters
along 50th Avenue, shrubs and/or vines or additional
architectural treatment is needed to break up the height
of the proposed wall.
2. An encroachment permit is needed from the Engineering
Department for the raised wall planters along 50th Avenue.
3. The proposed materials and colors match those used in the
gate house to be constructed on Orchard Lane.
DRB6/5.GL/CS -2- 1'
RECOMMENDATION:
Review plans in conjunction with Staff comments and determine
acceptability.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Locality Plan
2. Noise study recommendations
3. Grading Plan
4. Perimeter wall cross section
5. Perimeter wall profile
6. Wall details
7. Gate column and gate details
DRB6/5,GL/CS -3
ATTACHMENT No. 1
CASE Na
AVE. 50
i
i'PNA 2.65Z5
zJ��
PROJECT
WCA77ONPARcr
i w
LL
3
AVE. 52
TENTATIVE TRACT 26524
ORTH
ATTACHMENT No. 2
_ _ � � •i � 4 'm j �� i- � �-5 -
M
Ir-
r
ATTACHMENT No. 3 ���,I
iijj g a I
�y ♦ ^/- i i - of V
y •�11 r� \ /\. �.� .� )�DO •1 a^i, POI 0000-7 � 3 e 5�++ 4
I / •
pp Cii
tl3W000Me
e ii 9 ... •
01
I)r
�• � � E .`T u r C y arNj p r. E�dy a'gr
II N �, � � c' ._ _•' �F Y
I• �� I � d� � F i t 9 I � e I ° � '" = rq.�gF37
,9� p 91a.
(77°lri°0
—e°'—fP'sv 77dy I� I ,� h� � t ' �e � I �"� -- — t+` •'� m e � � t
e j°J a i3
�i 7—Estle p I I 1 ., I �)I.°1Us�_c� Ek— — �� ,��I • u �egE "— :�
F it I aJj' [ me t N aI 6— Cll IM G0 CL-
It
1-
I
f� r�Q)i1r
624S2 ON l:)V&1
d�
ra
A TTA ruAeC-hj-.-
ATTACHMENT No. 5
LU
CIO
i a 9
I
a t
I
t Q •� , a
t I s
I
I
I
I
ti I
S
0
� u t d � l
Na
rcl
ATTACHMENT
E EAR
� o#
i� FE $i e
e
�� el I' P
A .. .
k
NO
sle
No. 6 1.
I
;l
z.
cl
�'-
ATTACHMENT No. 7
17
_LJV
o
Y�
E g
f F
ta7
LL
�
$
t�¢€
�tl�
ySi{
� B5 2_��
g9[ �a i:•�
>i
tat
z
9
i
a
t�+
ar
II
�
§gig
U
b
b
b '
a
LL W
U
rY'
W
�
f
a
•l
N
s
U
DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
ARCHITECT:
LOCATION
BACKGROUND:
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
JUNE 5, 1991
PLOT PLAN 91-462 AND SIGN APPROVAL 91-148: APPROVAL OF
GUARD GATE HOUSE AND MONUMENT SIGN
VILLA LA QUINTA HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
CARL COX
NORTH SIDE OF 50TH AVENUE AT AVILA
The Applicants have submitted plans for approval of a new guard house to replace
the existing telephone kiosk structure. The present kiosk structure is Spanish in
nature with a small tile roof and stucco sides.
SUBMITTAL:
The proposed construction would consist of a guard house with a restroom, new
landscaping, widening of the road, and new monument sign. In order to
accommodate the construction, the existing curbs will need to be modified, existing
landscaping removed, and new wall to be constructed on the west side of the entry
and at the northeast corner of the entry. These new walls will match the existing
wall on the east side of the entry. The existing entry gates will be retained in place.
The architecture of the proposed guard gate house is Spanish in nature with
materials consisting of a US tile two piece mission "flashed" roof tile, exterior
plaster, and bronze tinted windows. There will be some Spanish tile utilized on the
building for accent. The roof will be extended over the guest lane.
SIGNS:
The proposed monument sign would be located in a planter immediately south of the
guard gate house. The proposed sign would have a plaster finish similar to the
guard gate house and have overall dimensions of three 3 feet 8 inches high by 7 feet
long. The letters spelling "La Quinta Country Club Estates" would be recessed into
the poured concrete (with stucco finish) panel and comply with size requirements. .
DRBST.004
LANDSCAPING/LIGHTING:
The Applicant has submitted a preliminary landscaping and lighting plan for the
project. Plant materials utilized are fairly water efficient but, lean towards the more
typical green country club type of planting. The plans do indicate landscape
lighting. This landscape lighting will have to comply with the Municipal Code
requirements. It should be noted that the Municipal Code does not allow lighting of
a subdivision sign. Therefore, it will have to be deleted. Hardscape consists of
stamped concrete adjacent to the guard gate house.
ANALYSIS:
Architecturally, Staff feels the plans are acceptable. Additionally, the landscaping
plans while not overly water efficient, is acceptable due to the small area involved
and existing surrounding planting.
Following review by the Design Review Board these plans will need to be reviewed
by the Fire Marshal and Engineering Department.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Design Review Board should review the plans in light of the above comments and
determine acceptability.
Attachments:
Vicinity map
Plot plan, floor plan, elevation, and landscaping plans
DRBST.004
CA, MOW
co
I... )y
cacam
y�/! T. • ,( �f ;
R6f _ -
F s a=®oo� CZ*88-022
2-800; �9; R-�®®o ' _ R 5
0
SR
_5 - R41 doe
o$
t®4000
®..
0`,V®N
,
MINION,
f 000
R-'2 *-4,000
PP ql-46a.
SA q l- 14AF
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: JUNE 5, 1991
PROJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STREET NAME SIGNS FOR VILLAGE
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
BACKGROUND:
The Design Review Board has been asked to consider various street name signs for
use within the Village Specific Plan area.
The Village Specific Plan text included examples of possible street signs for use
within the Village area. Attached are the appropriate pages pertaining to these
street signs. Additionally there are attachments showing the desirable architectural
styles for the Village area.
The Village Specific Plan indicated that street signs should be unique to the Village.
The plan suggests the incorporation of street signs into the walls which can be read
at eye level from a car. As such, the suggested sign is more of a monument sign as
opposed to a normal street sign.
Also attached are some excerpts from various types of street signs that are
available. Regardless of what type of sign is utilized, it may be desirable to include
a "Village at La Quinta" type logo on the sign to indicate areas within the Village.
Because the architecture theme for the Village is "desert oasis", signage should
reinforce that theme.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Design Review Board should review the information available and determine a
type of street sign for use within the Village.
Attachments:
1. Village Specific Plan area map
2. Excerpts from the Village Specific Plan
3. Examples of street name signs
DRBST.002
0,90
�v
C
X
N
V
------z------�
---1 d
a,
.a
r
u
u
M
�
Ay. f
vmnivro 3Trn
" r � C
4 U. 0
JCLJUO
svvwv3a vmanv
— I �
� 01
1 �
lJ L_
M
M
a
a
�
d
ar
1.1
fp
d
O
06
0
Fa
I OI
EA ,
l
OuurA" WO v
IjN1/N,^ "N AV
OOBv'rin vaw3nv
C ii w. N O 0 m N y m d N E O G/ (D •O C �• "0 c Gl d L c
'mM y•3d «jO cNCN.0CC0Y(m I- M 70 m CO>.V C)a)pA
« 3N OL= v-a_ OU O ONE«w
uE�0>-2>u0im03 Ntpa+'-;mm d>-ma10i w" mx>o
L L LCA•C r+ LL a mm�m> Lm
m N y. •p 7 CAN d 7 '6 7 a- -- w- N a L (� .+ U
�., L0A d mm-Y '- >O mm-Ip mv_r G: 1-m 0.J.3 OMy O
di~vac';03a= °C a�00C3C1LLo d°yA. 0a`r�;�i
U 7 i N zz
O W C �' m N m �+ ; U ♦+ CA
m .0m m— v
r oy�U"dt U•CLt1��m NN+r0C A>,O1t >.UCC•0Z �Q
c~ LmO� M ~~-'0
8
•O mNm0-
0
�m��- m GC
"cp�?IUmmd3 cy
�1, —>co�mc In Cy
am—N
° d C° 3° w C` y ; C C U N1.L+ C C « C Z 0A' C +0 w —
mm�o�NN?° oL�yoX.-�oQ�=0 0 m(nmooC
_U m'.- N m 61 O -t0. !n N O° C TL r V 3 7 m N 0 y m '0 N m m« O� y N C
L Uww NNE ._ U aim ° N m CJC SIZ c E- Ip y u c 0)
ou d F- o ;I a c�� '"1—"al « �o rn x�+EaCO1N
L O .O rL+ C >• « 7 G "1 C A C V m N O m C *0 C i0 L N L +'' �+ V N c
N N O •— 0 m y QA m C •Qp� _u >•N m
.Cm CN.O e�'p N CM yAN 0. cY141LUN0f C~NC•'DCm m.+
C N�Wmb'NLa05. •O> wtNN�3 4A am °1�071°il 1..E IM 00L
7.7jUNmm m4) 4>v i m;c�ul04 NIvoN= uc—aA NNi+i+C1
CAm.0A ^m C UL N y A ao B aaTe c m vai �t pAC pAA m> ` iy�.. 4) 0 t. O
�i
Jw m;;_ O L U.003:° M 00U n!^�1`i1 F-NL'm U.cm �`0 a-nG O.�'C'Oa
E
1
M
. e
e93e
If
a
A�JI
IN1`-
I
Ipl
ela)1
1�1
1�1
pp
j �
�N�
ipi
ilRb7le
1�1
/�e
1�1
liil
I�e
1 I
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 i
IF�I
I�il
1
1
1�1
La
Amyl
1 1
IA
1 1
L'J1
M1
1
1 a,.
1 �
1�1
1
!
1�17
1 1
° �l j � (Qlp�• 11�1G �� Q {A.
(I 2
C
Luk-;
mmvvm
.CCcC7
O L V 4)<
° a3
72 E 0 v
u N m C c
m� m m
aL '^ a
W 7
a yv 0,
71°aiiE "
O m
Ln m
N> d f m
a
Ylm .0
raL+Cm�
m N
N +O+ O C1�
V ;
O 00.03 ,
m
U 'Om>m '0
IC CL - < 7
tn W
E
vy0WEn
m
m 4)
> H 7 m c
L a
g (D o r,
LLJ E .- m JE v,
Oyu
m a• `
Q 7 c
va m .
` 'D
m O1 O V
c m c O$
O15 .L
m«
C O C C
m"E0
300a c
C Ln
m U OE 0
L
O m 'n tn
W
acmrn
E m -C c
aT y M
v�m-
C L +' m
m N O C
c„ a
rncE�
= N V
In
3� m m
4;
m 3 'O
-m�
> M .0
m �
cm
o '- u
m m
D mE
Qmo
7 N N
N >
aM
1
var T
c« m
4 4-
.+
VI O m
v
ccami
N OD
d ace
u d
w CL.O
m m u c
t .0 L O
u
aTC(D w
LOC
u'0+' a10
m
muCEa�i
1-E�mu�i
Ern •c
a U N m 7 N
m ,,m E
a o c
i o m
am m
E— ao_E , o
m O
CTou c
m rnc
m
m aL.+a� O NY
L N u_ m
mM C o m
N 3 O 7 m
-
IMO~tv>
(a m in N C m
m
y m L aL+
C C d; N N
E'o E m� d
i-- m
0 7
CO _4)
'n > .c Ym-•
N
c
m
a
L
u
u
7
L
N
m
L
w
C
O�
co
.2 i
0.
am
•� u
A a
An
C
a01i
is
> u
m 'L
.C.+
m �
« v
3L
OI m
C imil�
v �3
tm.C>
o+= m
jam+ m
L. c m
4'Lv
two
m •0 O
amu
L
m
m
t=
C m tr m 0 m f0
O > L
_ N
3 3 N
(n
E4)X
LA C
0
C L 01 N C
C
dv
E �
E =m
� N L
m
a-cLcUJX0
«
'
> 0cc_°'o.a
E�,rcwo
c
O
-C
u
7 C
m
E w •- N
O
a
utA
m
aC 0'O✓
N
E•-Lcm
m O.EP
fl W
com
��
-
m
N
m� m D
3
UV
rna`la'
C W, C.Li
y�
o
m m- Z.-
3
a
O
(A X >.
0 Q_ C C
m
t W j y N
-ILmUmut>
N
Ib
113 Z
um ow uw
w w i
d L O
- 01 C
M.C.-
C
w ._
C i
O O
•O m
C 'L
Y
"> v
67 E
`m
m
O m
zL
p1> 0
i
U 0
�;
c i
U
ca
m
(A
"v
0 c
m U u u
d
0
'0 y
d
N
L
0
C X
vw w
.O C
,n•o- rn
w Y
m
c
d
N
f
•IA
C 'O m '^
N
d_
o
O O
C �.0
E O NL
B 0
mL
ac
-'E i 0
c �: i
d C Y
d vw
mm
aw
E
0
m U
>•-•
tEvami
-o
°L
0u7 QI
''io
sa
ym
du,
��N
`>
mE at
V
-m"
O1° rn
c
E"
N�H
aoorn
• C
o«
O
0)
C
LE
W L
c- t
i
V O
a
O
°'o d
Y
°wc
>,'�
c
mo�
c
m
•O E«
O y
'� c 0
m°
L.
0 y N
xU..._
c t !� O
0 V vl
aru,c
C C
Lom
�+ M
ca
A^ E A
y ca
L 0.0)
u c rn
mv:
M L. 0
m-_ 0)
F-.0 a 0.
Q U n
w m m
- Uw-
W
a
�
a
0
a
a
a
3
a
i
d
L
O
c
m
a,
N
U9
to
W
F,
Z
O
C
N
�
Y
N
W
m
O
� c N
pl
Y � • N �
O d
m d m�,rn
va o w
m . V -a
m V 0 O
> 0�Lv A
L i c
N N 0 h
L 0 L.
Y C • V
CM
U
C
Y V « m
L N d c
c Y o °
o'CY-m
8 r
tn
N
c O W
CY Ury OC1
Y�yCi VI
p v aO
Hnl
kl
14
n ;
M w
d M
rnm
M U
c
> L
Y
d c
L O
Yd
YY
UtY0
C d
V
m
m n.
L
Y �
NL
c
rn-
"o
CL
O 0
d
M
U c m
r a >
01m°�
co
r
r
U
aL
Emo
«Cm
..
oL��
o
u E«
t °'
g;
00
N`
�E
CL
°'t;
3m
aNim
4,p1n
c
Cal N
O w
C .O m
V
C N
W
O y«
L)
L Ln
u
L
4)
y 7
O 8
�+
—
m
aLN�
a,N
Ln
y
mfa `o
ode
«tad
070
o;E
>�N
NOI
mN•O
w1711 NN
IA0
NCx
mm a
O
M
m
m
v
61
N
V
O
Vmm
�d
m.NC.
V4)
1
N
NCOmm0mm0N
d
E0
uC
N
9Ca>
41
�m
yU
tn OI
L
DiO
-0 t
N- V
U
V t p
L
c
70 N
N N
C
7
p
p•
yl
y
41
L L
Nd
m
N�
-�OMtac
Nin-
t O
m
U✓m
N
N
4-C
U
CD
C
OltVm
m �N
V
441
L.
0
4
�0.41Nd0
L
t--QJ—
v
O1
�O1
N>d
-.
a
tnumi3
inE3
a4�+J�
L 6/ N
M
'4
1
c N
t0
1
1
O+
to-•v_d—
o�lo
" CyE c
N G C i h N f0
U ILfI ate+
V V LIM
Q 0 H
M. m
E
m C. O �i
o
C C... C
"yrmNc..
-CO
L O1 y 7 Q N
7T_
m
y
a
L-0 m
o.c j ms r«
„ o m w
@
N c E
u
c
c �+
m N 010
7 L 0O
O
N
d
0m0V)Ntm
72v'0
3
L
W f «
0. d
d at
r
%- O N c
O
L
r
c
m E L d tm
V �'O f' m N L
N
C o. w
LL
� V u
`c o
L
E o
..
�741 W'o0m
GG.c
NLj��
41M
w
L.
C�LUm 060
L
tra
3mL.N,mNm
4-0a+
0in0so
0 C Q
o
aT+C.L+OC�
V1 In.0 M
N
d C 0)NtL OIM
aL+ N N tC 44) O
0, J
STREET & ROAD NAME SIGN
ins
�
asM..✓ �kv* y3
ALUMINUM BRACKETS AND PLATES
ORDERING
44n vaWval s��s
GUIDE
MAR D...AR��VE1G�:1POSITIIIE=-10
]II(S)Pl _- PAGEII
Recommended .080" Maximum Thickness, if Only One Nome Plate, .063".
PLATE ASSORTMENT
3'.
HoldBy ' '• )
F.B. ufi AVAILABLE TO FIT
HARDWARE SON
F.B. 9}"
06"
Pa•s Le end varaa
aruble
Through 81", 24", 30'; or 36" F.B. 120
24'; 30'; or 36"
oBoth f Each
Screw e
- Plate F.B. 119 var'wble rustic
FoB. 122
18'; 24", 30'; or 36"
ILLUST RATEDI
2 NAME ASSEMBLY 1 NAME ASSEMBLY 3 NAME ASSEMBLY
V14(5)PL-2C 2P' V14(S)PL•2C 1P V14(S)PL-2C 3P
ME-AVry�j
V - W
I
IGHL-0
x
SITIVE
CK"V14(HD1PLRe -
Re mmend
.080" Maximum Thickness,
0 -
((((eeee��i�d'} �1
���!ll
���CCC,,,...
�f .063 if Only
One Name Plate.
F.B. 1l8 F.B. 123
P07"I
3,.
F.B. 121 3" 9"Holds
Lgend varoble variable 24';30';0,36" Pas•Both Sides 18'; 24•.30", or 36"
varable 24", �', or 36"
Th ,ugh of Each F.B. ]24
S.w .,. Pl me 119
F.B. 122
FaB.
z �rI LLUSTRATED
F.B. 120
2 NAME ASSEMBLY 1 NAME ASSEMBLY 3 NAME ASSEMBLY variable rustic
V14(HD)PL•2C 2P• V10(HD)PL•2C 1P Vld(HD)PL-2C 3P 18;24•; 30'; or 36"
V GROUP F
Applicable to All V14F
Product Reference Sheets
Style Letters
Monterey
Style Letters
FB 118 Plate
Shown
FB 121 Plate
;STANDARD ;WEIGHT " SLOTTED -LOCK"
V14(S)SL Recommend .080" Thickness, '
N9 i
F B. 112
.063"
F.B.: 14
if Only One Name Plate.
F.B. 116 3, 9
r
wnY•
ROSE
fit' Lopenda
Holds By Both Sides
Set Sc • of Each
: 0",oe
2d', 30'�or36"
variable 2d', 30'; or 36"
j
variable 24", 30 ;or36"
`_
I
P s• plate
n I
,•
F.B. 313
F.B. IIS
F.B. 117
�
_ IIIIRRT N
`
By141.01a
11
ILLUSTRATEDL-
2 NAME ASSEMBLY
I NAME ASSEMBLY
3 NAME ASSEMBLY
_
Oathic �Shown
V14(S)SL•2C2P'
V14(S)SL•2C1P
V14(5)SL•2C 3P
variable rustic (
18 , 24', X!; nr 36"
Style Letters FB 113 Plot,
_
SMr j�StOUED�10—(r—VI4(HO)SIT Recommend .080", .100", .125", or
�!'�sa•� � .250"(Extraded Bulb Plate)
F.B. 112 or F.B. 109 F.B. 114 F.B. 116 6 9 • e
Holds 0j*W'.V7
variable q,• sable variable 2d",K. 36': or vanobl��.�.
Pass24': 30', 36', or 42" 18',2P: 30r', 36",or42" 24,30 36', or 42"
Througr
or $NF.B. 113 F.B. 110 F.B. I15 F.B. 117
Screw extruded Plate
LopondsILLUSTRATEDBoth Side2 NAME ASSEMBLY 1 NAME ASSEMBLY 3 NAME ASSEMBLY variable rustic Mission
of Each Plata V14(HD)SL•2C 2P' V14(HD)SL•2C IF V14(HD)SL•2C OP 18",24',30'; 36';er42•. Style Letters
`ASTR SIGM'VKHA)'Plate•.OSO" Flat.— -- - ••
ASTRO-SIGN V14(HA-E) --
Two Plotos Bad To be Esr.ui on
to Bad in Frame Legend Both SidesA
Ai:. F.B. 101 8.•.. or9" vamble24'�30",36"or42" -1 24",30", 36'; or 42"BF.B. 1021 I B rs.,F.B. ]O6ILLUSTRATED IC ILLUSTRATED2 NAME ASSEMBLY GothiShown2 NAME ASSEMBLY Gy Vl4(HA)•2C4P' I Style Letters FB 101V14(HA-E)•2C2B' S
[CENTERAR00""SYSTEM V14(HSI"upae.050', Embossed or Back
o Back
- .080" Per Flat.
d slgN Plates are Single Faced Back to Back - 2 Per Name! �I��O
ILLUSTRATED
2 NAME ASSEMBLY F.B. 304 F.B. ]00 F.B. 108
V 14(HS)•2C4P'
t variable 24'; 30'; or 36" F RR
1 NAME ASSEMBLY 3•� GE OII�
V14(HS)•2C2P q••
3 NAME ASSEMBLY F.B. 107 F, B. 103 F.B. I11 6" i
V14(H$)•2C6P Block Number Assemblies Identified as HSN.
.1
2C INDICATES CAP TO FIT T I.D. PIPE, "SIZES SHOW LIMITATION WHERE NECESSARY
2S5C FITS 2)4" I.D. PIPE. OTHER SIZES -OTHERWISE PLATE HEIGHT 6", 6t/", 8", or Gothic
AVAILABLE IN ADDITION TO U•POST AND 9" 15 AVAILABLE AS ILLUSTRATED ON PAGE Style Letters
(SL.63.2-776) SQUARE POST. 2 AND 3-
Shorn
FB 105 Plate
Shown
FB104 Plata
1'(1�
ti't
/TE RfllECr1W LETTERS ON INTERSTATE
WEN AULECr/VE SNEEr/NG
7V Porr
O PYPE
LONG
Bat
�.[- •'.: '' Ij '. ,. �} :PROD ANCNo1,
���CgMCRETF
WORso'
t—D
A- 4BA/S%4OMDUNPLA7EO CARR/A" IOU
I- Ml 6 U f TOP AND CROSS SADDLE Of
AA10OZED ALVAIAW
C- IIµ PLATES. (AMODISEDALW/NUM£XTRVS/OM
OF WO63 T-4 ALLOT LWINIAL.r
O- yfAASSr AMOO?EOALUHINLWPOST W/rN TYREE
JWALLENME40 STA/MLESS STEfi ffr SCRLWS.
� l•
NOLF LAM
M U V V
s
r
i
J�
yr
Fh
—
NOTE:
ONE COMPLETE MANE WM 1AWr
O ~
wo meED ON EACN /NT£RSIC r/ON WMEN
PROPfRTI L/NF
FAVTO W1PrN OR CURLED WDrN /S 40
INSTALLATION DETAILS
.'-- -
rzrr OPLESS; rWO COMPLErENAME
- \
SWN UNITS REOU/NED FOR W/OTN
6REArFR rNAN 60 FFEr WHEN rw0 S/GN
f/6N LOCI f/ON h
.
f ♦�,
UM'TS ARE At ACED T'NEr SNALL Of ON
O/AGONALLT OPPOSIrf CORNERS SO
I
TNAr rHfr WILL Of ON rNE FAR
,'I I
C I I
R16Nr-NAND SIDEOF rMf INTERSECTION
•- —
NrNOR SrR[[r
FOP TRAFFIC ON TNf MVRE /NPORrAMr
i I
CURB SIDEWAL K
s rREF r.
o I
• -
County of Riverside
MINOR STREET
COMMERCIAL
SIDEWALK
STREET NAME SIGN
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: JUNE 5, 1991
PROJECT: CITY ENTRY SIGNS STATUS
This is to inform you of the status of the City entry sign which you previously
reviewed and recommended to the City Council. The City Council at their meeting
of February 5, 1991, reviewed the sign recommended by the Design Review Board.
As you recall, the design is a Spanish, early California motif utilizing cantera stone,
stucco and colored concrete with sandblasted lettering and a quail logo. The City
Council at that time determined that the City should wait until the Civic Center sign
for the City Hall site is completed. The reason for this is to determine whether the
City entry signs should match or be similar to the new City Hall sign. Should there
be other sign designs considered, we would anticipate that the Design Review Board
will review these new designs.
DRBST.001
City Council Minutes 4 February 5, 1991
0
5. REVIEW OF PROPOSED CITY ENTRY SIGN DESIGN FOR USE THROUGHOUT
CITY.
Mr. Sawa, Principal Planner, presented the Council with a
design of the proposed entry sign for the City, which was
prepared by Paul Anderson, a member of the Design Review
Board. The design is a "spanish, early -California" motif
utilizing cantera stone, stucco and colored concrete and sand-
blasting for the lettering and has a quail at the top. The
proposed locations for these signs are 1) on the south side of
Highway 111 at the western City limits; Highway ill and
Jefferson on the eastern City limits and on the southeast
corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street facing north.
The Design Review Board and Planning Commission reviewed the
sign and recommends approval. The Art in Public Places
Committee also reviewed the sign and felt that it should be
held over and looked at in light of the Civic Center sign.
Discussion ensued with Council expressing concern over
compatibility with the Civic Center sign and concurred that
this matter should be carried over until such a sign is
designed by the architect. Suggestions included having the
Design Review Board send out a request for quotations to
design the sign or to have the school kids present proposals.
Questions that surfaced included the need to include "City of"
on the sign; lighting and landscaping and what is on the
backside of the sign.
Council Member Sniff and Mayor Pena believed that we should
proceed with the design of this sign whether that means
sending it back to the Design Review Board or to send it out
for bid.
MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Rushworth/Franklin
that the matter of the City's entry sign be carried over until
the architect completes the design of the Civic Center sign.
Motion carried with Council Member Sniff and Mayor Pena voting
NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 91-17.
6. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPANTS ON CIVIC CENTER ART PURCHASE
AWARD COMMITTEE.
Mr. Kiedrowski advised that last year the Council appointed a
Civic Center Art Purchase Award Committee and this year, the
Arts in Public Places Committee has suggested that they serve
as this Committee with participation from the Council; or as
the nucleus of the Committee. Last year, the Council
suggested that this year, the Council's selection would be by
drawing lots.