1993 06 02 DRB6
A Regular Meeting to be held at the
La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California
June 2, 1993
5:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER - Flag Salute
II. ROLL CALL
III. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Plot Plan 93-500; a request of LANDREX for approval of off -water architectural
plans for Phase I of the Avante collection in Tract 26152, Lake La Quinta for
models and single family homes
B. Plot Plan 93-499; a request of Kaufman & Broad Home Corporation for approval
of Phase 2 architectural plans for single family residences within Tentative Tract
23923 (Quinterra).
C. Sign Application 93-197. Amendment k2; a request of Mr. Skip Berg, DGI
Graphics for JFK Memorial Hospital to deviate from the master sign program for
the new JFK sign program at Plaza Tampico.
D. Plot Plan 93-498; a request of Stonington Properties for approval to allow
construction of a 7,000 square foot retail paid building located approximately 700
feet east of Washington Street within the One Eleven La Quinta Center.
E. Plot Plan 93-497; a request of Morite of California (Red Robin Restaurant) for
approval to construct a 7,280 square foot restaurant with outdoor seating within
the One Eleven La Quinta Center.
F. Plot Plan 93-501; a request of Winchester Asset Management (for La Quinta Golf
Properties) for approval of plans for a golf course clubhouse for "The Quarry"
project located south and west of Lake Cahuilla.
G. Specific Plan 84-004; a request of TD Desert Development (Chuck Strother) for
approval of preliminary plans for an entry design on Washington Street and
review of general architectural guidelines for the Orchard project (previously The
Pyramids. �� 1
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
Approval of the Minutes of the regular Design Review Board Meeting of May 5, 1993.
V. OTHER
VI. ADJOURNMENT
(10 IL
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993
CASE NO: PLOT PLAN 93-500
PROJECT: APPROVAL OFF -WATER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PHASE
I OF THE AVANTE COLLECTION IN TRACT 26152 - LAKE LA
QUINTA FOR MODELS AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
APPLICANT: LANDREX
REPRESENTATIVE: ROBERTS. RITCHEY, AIA
LOCATION: EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET AND NORTH OF 48TH AVENUE
BACKGROUND:
Tract 26152 (formerly TT 24230) was approved by the City Council on July 3, 1990. At that time eight
unit types were approved for construction. Of these eight units, four off -water designs for the Marquessa
on Lake La Quinta project were approved. The off -water products consisted of three single story designs
and one two story design. The applicant was Wilma Pacific. None of the units were ever constructed.
NEW PROPOSAL:
The current applicant, LANDREX, proposes to build three single story family units ranging from 1909
square feet to 2565 square feet in size. The applicant will offer a variety of front elevation styles with
Model "A" having three, "B" with four and "C" with three designs. Each unit has an attached two car
garage.
Model "C" features an optional guest house or optional four bedroom and three and a half bath. The
guest house has one bedroom and one bath all units offer covered patios. A model complex is proposed
that will feature three units. The model complex will be built on Lots 167, 168, and 169, with a
temporary parking lot on Lot 166, all located on the east side of Via Orvieto. In addition, nine units are
proposed in Phase I on Lots 127 through 135 located on Via Soud, a cul-de-sac street. The proposed
units feature the following:
Model
Area
Bedroom
Bath
A
1,909
3
3
B
2,435
3
3
4-option
3.5-option
1+ guest house option
C
2,565
3
3.5
DRBST.092
1
The architectural style is a contemporary Spanish -Mediterranean, with glazing as a prominent
feature. The units have varied roof designs and architectural ornamentation. Height of these
units is 20-feet not including chimneys, except for Model "C" which is 22-feet not including
chimneys.
Exterior plaster colors include Vintage, French Vanilla, and Adobe manufactured by La Habera
Stucco. Roof material is flat concrete tile of a light variegated buff color. Window frames will
be white metal. A color and materials board has been submitted.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS:
1. The front yard of all lots, and in addition the street side yard of corner lots, shall be
landscaped to property line, edge of curb, sidewalk, or edge of street pavement, which
ever is furthest from the residence.
2. The landscaping shall include trees (minimum two 15-gallon trees on interior lots and
five 15-gallon trees on corner lots), shrubs, and groundcover and/or hardscape of
sufficient size, spacing and variety to create an attractive and unifying appearance.
Landscaping shall be in substantial compliance with the standards set forth in the Manual
on Architectural Standards and the Manual on Landscaping Standards as adopted by the
Planning Commission. A landscaping and irrigation plan for the Phase I construction
shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Development.
3. A permanent water -efficient irrigation system shall be provided for all areas required to
be landscaped.
4. The landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and viable condition by
the property owner.
5. The standards of the R-1 Zoning shall be met (e.g., setbacks, etc.).
6. A minimum four -inch stucco pop -out shall be used around all exterior sliding glass doors
and windows on side and rear elevations to ensure architectural compatibility and to
provide minimum shading from the exposure to the sun.
7. If the model homes are converted to sales office (e.g., converted garages, etc.) as part
of the marketing program for the tract, the Applicant shall file with Staff a floor plan or
Letter of Intent detailing the work to be done. A cash bond or another type of security
should be posted to ensure that the home(s) is reconverted prior to its sale and/or
occupancy.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review plans in conjunction with Staff comments and determine acceptability. The Design
Review Board recommendation will then be forwarded to the Planning Commission.
DRBST.092
2
Attachments:
Vicinity map
Site plan of tract
Architectural plans
DRBST.092
0o7
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993
PROJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23913 (QUINTERRA) - PHASE 2;
APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES
CASE NO.: PLOT PLAN 93-499 (MODEL HOMES)
APPLICANT: KAUFMAN & BROAD HOME CORPORATION
REPRESENTATIVE: MIKE SMITH;HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF MILES AVENUE, EAST OF ADAMS STREET
BACKGROUND:
The tract is a 116 lot subdivision approved by the City in 1988. The subdivision was
recorded in 1990. The original Applicant, Waldon Financial, had anticipated building
single family homes ranging in size for 1,670 to 2,570 square feet.
In 1990, Windsor Construction Company purchased the project. The existing 18
homes within Phase 1 were developed by Windsor Construction Company in 1990 &
1991. The homes built by Windsor Construction Company were one and two story
units. Three floor plans were used varying in size from 2,071 to 2,593 square feet
excluding garages. The homes sold for +$200,000. The Planning Commission
approved the house plans on December 11, 1990.
Architectural styles varied from Mediterranean to Southwest with exterior materials
consisting of stucco, wood, trim, tile, accents and multi -colored tile roof. Colors
are earth tones with Southwest accent colors, and a brown/beige roof tile. Three
elevations were available for each plan.
NEW PROPOSAL:
The Applicant is in the process of purchasing the remaining +93 lots within Phase 2
to develop single story homes on the existing +8,000 square foot lots. The
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map 23913 require that the Applicant
submit to Design Review Board and Planning Commission architectural plans of any
type of unit design to be built within the tract. Based on this requirement, the
Applicant has submitted their model plans which includes three sizes of homes from
1,166 square feet to 1,567 square feet (3 & 4 bedroom units). Each unit has an
attached two car garage or three car garage if the lot is large enough and the client
would like this amenity with the purchase of the home. Plans 1, 2 & 3 include three
elevation types per size of home, but the optional three car garage elevation was not
submitted for review.
DRBST.005
I ! o n
The model complex will be built on the north side of Ladera Drive between Fronterra
Drive & Los Manos Drive, north of the existing landscaped retention basin.
The architectural style is consistent with the mediterranean theme used in Phase 1.
The units include covered entry patios, varied roof designs & embellishments, and
other architectural characteristics. The homes are 16 to 18 feet in overall height.
The exterior building colors will be similar to Phase 1. The colorboard will be
available at the meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed units are smaller in size than those built in Phase 1. The Applicant
has stated that their market research has shown that smaller, more affordable units
are selling whereas the larger homes are not as marketable in today's economic
climate. The R-1 Zoning Code does not define the size of home which can be built
similar to the SR Zoned areas which prescribe minimum 1,200 square foot homes.
However, there is a section in the general guidelines which requires all homes in the
City to be greater than 750 square feet. Staff has also researched both the tract
Conditions and CC&R provisions to make sure the proposed homes can be built, as
proposed. The Applicant's proposal meets these minimum standards, but to ensure
that the original owners retain their property values, staff would like to require the
applicant to meet a minimum house size requirement of 1,200 square feet.
The front elevations are attractive and well proportioned. However, the eave
overhangs are generally minimal except for the entry door locations. The side and
rear elevations are plain and should have some additional architectural treatment
similar to the front elevations (e.g. stucco pop -outs around the windows). The
proposed architectural features will complement the overall building design and
supplement the State's Title 24 Energy Efficiency requirements.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS:
The front yard of all lots, and in addition the street side yard of corner lots,
shall be landscaped to property line, edge of curb, sidewalk, or edge of street
pavement, which ever is furthest from the residence.
The landscaping shall include trees (minimum two 15-gallon trees on interior
lots and five 15-gallon trees on corner lots) , shrubs, and groundcover and/or
hardscape of sufficient size, spacing and variety to create an attractive and
unifying appearance. Landscaping shall be in substantial compliance with the
standards set forth in the Manual on Architectural Standards and the Manual
on Landscaping Standards as adopted by the Planning Commission.
3. A permanent water -efficient irrigation system shall be provided for all areas
required to be landscaped. The provisions of Ordinance #220 shall be met.
4. The landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and viable
condition by the property owner.
The standards of the R-1 Zoning shall be met (e.g. setbacks, etc.).
DRBST.005
-1 n 0 7
A minimum four -inch stucco pop -out shall be used around all exterior sliding
glass doors and windows to ensure architectural compatibility to the Phase 1
units and to provide minimum shading from the exposure to the sun.
If the model homes are converted to sales offices (e.g. coverted garages,
etc.) as part of the marketing program for the tract, the Applicant shall file
with staff a floor plan or letter of intent detailing the work to be done. A cash
bond or another type of security should be posted to ensure that the home(s)
is reconverted prior to its sale and/or occupancy.
Plot Plan of tract showing setbacks shall be submitted to the Planning &
Development Department for approval. Units shall be plotted so that the
largest units are adjacent to the existing Quinterra homes. The minimum home
size for the tract should be 1,200 square feet.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review plans in
Design Review
Commission.
Attachments:
conjunction with Staff comments and determine acceptability. The
Board recommendation will then be forwarded to the Planning
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan of Tract
3. Architectural plans
DRBST.005
00S
C•,
z
z
- g v cai
o m
x
dLu
;1
1
4� 05
P;lyy
F 1, 1 1 'b4n1dN.1Na 3 a jr I ;i: W
1
-7-- .. - .. . ' a
' �•'� � -tiles T � �'i i � / _'
Ilk
ir
r
UJ
O
•j
___-_may._—
Z ARE swvav = = w
LL
BI #C
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993
PROJECT: SIGN APPLICATION 93-197 (AMENDMENT #2)
APPLICANT: MR. SKIP BERG, DGI GRAPHICS
CLIENT: JFK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MR. HARRIS F. KOENIG
REQUEST: DEVIATION FROM THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE NEW
JFK SIGN PROGRAM AT PLAZA TAMPICO.
LOCATION: 78-150 CALLE TAMPICO (NORTHEAST CORNER OF DESERT
CLUB DRIVE AND CALLE TAMPICO)
BACKGROUND:
On March 3, 1993, the Design Review Board examined the request of JFK Memorial
Hospital to install a new freestanding sign and additional building signs at their
facility at the northeast corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive but prior to
the meeting a continuance was requested by Mr. Harris F. Koenig, Associate
Administrator of JFK Hospital. The Design Review Board stated that the proposed
freestanding sign (12-foot high and 42 sq. ft.) should be redesigned so that it is
consistent with the existing standards of the Village Specific Plan. On April 7, 1993
the Design Review Board reconsidered the original request but since no one spoke
regarding the request, the Board voted to deny the application (see the attached
background material) .
RESUBMITTAL:
On May 20, 1993, Staff received new revised exhibits from the sign contractor
requesting reconsideration by the Design Review Board of your denial on April 7,
1993. The new request by JFK includes the relocation of the freestanding sign back
to its existing location at the main entry on Calle Tampico. The existing structure
would be demolished and a new 12-foot high externally illuminated (+50 square feet)
project identification sign would be constructed. The Applicant's request is to
identify both Plaza Tampico and the JFK Civic Center (Medical Plaza) . The denied
sign identified the Medical Plaza and had three insert signs to identify the existing
physicians at the site. The new sign will be sandblasted wood with painted copy.
A tile roof and stucco raised base are also proposed. Fluorescent lighting will be
mounted under the tile roof structure to make the sign visible at night. The
attached building sign has also been revised to match the proposed freestanding sign
and relocated to the first floor level of the building.
DRB.005/CS
ro
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed freestanding sign is more consistent with the purpose and intent of the
Village Plan in terms of architectural characteristics and materials/textures. The
only issue is whether or not the sign can be considered a "pedestrian" sign. Staff's
opinion is that the sign should be no taller than +7-feet. Our thoughts would be to
reduce the sign base to 3-feet and eliminate the top portion of the sign (e.g. the
wording "Plaza Tampico") .
If the Design Review Board supports the Applicant's request, an adjustment to the
master sign program will be necessary for the building sign and the freestanding
sign. However, the Planning Commission can make adjustments to both the Master
Sign Program and the existing Sign Ordinance if certain findings are made.
CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, Staff supports the Applicant's revised request based on the attached
exhibits provided the new freestanding sign is consistent with the provisions of the
Village Specific Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend approval of the current proposal if the maximum height of the
freestanding sign does not exceed +7-feet.
Attachments:
1. April 7, 1993 Design Review Board Report
DRB.005/CS
oil
DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
CLIENT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
BACKGROLND:
STAFF REPORT �'
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING APRIL 7, IM FILE COPY
SIGN APPLICATION 93-197 (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 3, 1993)
MR. SKIP BERG, DGI GRAPHICS
JFK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MR. HARRIS F. KOENIG
DEVIATION FROM THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE NEW
JFK SIGN PROGRAM AT PLAZA TAMPICO.
78-150 CALLE TAMPICO (NORTHEAST CORNER OF DESERT
CLUB DRIVE AT CALLE TAMPICO).
On March 3, 1993, the Design Review Board examined the request of JFK Memorial Hospital
to install a new freestanding sign and additional building signs at their facility at the northeast
corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive but prior to the meeting a continuance was
requested by Mr. Harris F. Koenig, Associate Administrator of JFK Hospital. The Board voted
to continue the request.
However, prior to continuing the case to April 7th, the Design Review Board stated that the
proposed freestanding sign (12-foot high and 42 sq. ft.) should be redesigned so that it is
consistent with the existing standards of the Village Specific Plan. The Board expressed hope
that the project identification sign would be redesigned before the next meeting. No new
information has been received since the last meeting.
CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, Staff cannot support the Applicant's request based on the adopted materials for
this site, design, and ordinance requirements. If the Applicant wishes to deviate from the
adopted provisions noted in the attached report the application must be reviewed by the Planning
Commission per Section 9.212.120.C.1 of the La Quinta Municipal Code.
RECOM11fENDATION:
Staff would recommend denial of the current proposal, but if the Applicant would like to revise
the graphics package, Staff would request continuing the matter to the May agenda.
Attachments:
1. March 3, 1993 Report
IL
DRBST.085 t
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
DATE: MARCH 3, 1993
PROJECT: SIGN APPLICATION 93-197
APPLICANT: MR. SKIP BERG, DGI GRAPHICS
CLIENT: JFK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MR. HARRIS F. KOENIG
REQUEST: DEVIATION FROM THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE NEW
JFK SIGN PROGRAM AT PLAZA TAMPICO.
LOCATION: 78-150 CALLE TAMPICO (NORTHEAST CORNER OF DESERT
CLUB DRIVE AT CALLE TAMPICO).
BACKGROUND:
The existing two story office/retail complex was approved in 1985. The existing site is
developed with improvements which were made to the site during the development of Phase One
of the property as required by Plot Plan 85-217 (Plaza Tampico). The westerly half of the site
is vacant. The master plan approved for the site allows the ultimate development of 100,000
square feet. The six acre site is zoned C-V-N (Commercial Village 'North').
APPROVED MASTER SIGN PROGRAM:
The Master Sign Program for this site was approved by the City on April 25, 1989. The
program was drafted by the Imperial Sign Company for the Plaza Tampico center. A copy of
the approved program is attached.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST:
The Applicant has requested new identification signs for the main tenant of the building (JFK
Medical). The new program includes a 52 square feet freestanding sign on Calle Tampico and
a 42 square feet building sign. Both signs are internally illuminated can signs. The 12-foot high
freestanding sign is located at the southeast comer of the site and the new building sign will be
placed on the west side of the building on the building parapet. The new signs will replace the
existing on -site signs. The JFK corporate colors will be used (white and blue).
DRBST.079
n,
-U U V
'General Retail Sales and Services, Business and Professional Offices, Eating and Drinking
Establishments and Other Commercial Uses.
1. Freestanding Signs.
a. Each commercial complex containing a multiple -tenant building or multiple
buildings is permitted one complex identification sign per street frontage. The area of any one
sign shall not exceed one -quarter of a square foot of sign area per lineal foot of street frontage,
or fifty square feet, which is less. The aggregate area of all such signs shall not exceed one
hundred square feet and sign area may not be combined among street frontages.
b. (Not pertinent to this case.)
C. The maximum height of any freestanding sign shall be twelve feet.
2. Attached Signs.
a. Each tenant within a multiple -tenant commercial complex may have one
attached identification sign not to exceed one square foot of sign area per lineal foot of tenant
space frontage along a street, or frontage along a common use parking lot where no direct street
frontage is provided, not exceeding fifty square feet. Corner, end, or separate tenant spaces
may split the allowable frontage sign area among two signs.
EXISTING DONN'NTOWN VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN:
The Downtown Village Specific Plan (87-009) was approved in 1988. The plan covered
approximately 100 acres and includes this property. The specific plan addressed many topics
and it included development guidelines for on and off -site signs. These guidelines are attached.
However, the C-V-N Zone code also states:
'Signs in the North Subzone shall focus on commercial centers or complex
identification, oriented to views from automobile traffic. Internal site signage
shall be scaled appropriately to its purpose and function. Building identification
shall be oriented to parking lot access. Uses within buildings shall be provided
with pedestrian directories. It is not intended that all occupants of the C-V-N
Subzone have equal signage exposure to the public right -of --way. All signs shall
comply with Chapter 9.212, Sign Regulations, except that more restrictive
provisions of the design standards for the Village shall apply.'
DRBST.079
2
ni4
ANALYS :
The Applicant has requested a deviation from standards of the 1989 Master Sign Program and
the 1988 Downtown Specific Plan requirements. The first issue Staff would like to address is
the proposal by the Applicant to remove the existing "Plaza Tampico" monument sign from the
project site in order to install the new twelve foot high multiple copy sign to the east of the
existing identification sign. The existing low profile sign is located at the westerly -most
driveway into the center on Calle Tampico. The existing sign (shown on Page 5 of 10 of the
Master Sign Program) is consistent with the intent of the Village Specific Plan for signs to have
a visual relationship to the building or its surroundings be indirectly lit and be wood or tile. The
new sign generally meets the provisions of the Sign Ordinance, but it does not meet the intent
of either the existing sign program nor the Specific Plan guidelines. Staff is opposed to the new
submittal because it is out of character with the future design program for this area and it
includes multiple copy graphics for the on -site physicians. Staff would support a similar sign
to that which exists except with new copy identifying the 'JFK Civic Center Medical Plaza" if
properly designed.
The second issue is the request for a new cabinet sign to replace the existing building mounted
sign on the westerly side of the building. The new sign measures 3' X 14' and is located on the
upper portion of the two story structure (see the attached plans). The graphics
allows for a de of
on
the building are located on Page 9 of 10 of the sign program. The approvalsign
the first floor level of the building versus the second story elevation proposed by the Applicant,
plus only illuminated signs are not allowed.
CONC_ LUSION:
In conclusion, Staff cannot support the Applicant's request based on the adopted materials for
this site, design, and ordinance requirements. If the Applicant would like to deviate from the
adopted provisions noted above, the application must be reviewed by the Planning Commission
per Section 9.212.120.C.I of the La Quinta Municipal Code.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend denial of the current proposal, but if the Applicant would like to revise
the graphics package, Staff would request continuing the matter to the April agenda.
Attachments:
1. Sign Exhibits
2. Letter from JFK Hospital
3. Excerpts from the adopted Village Specific Plan
4. Master Sign Program
DRBST.079
3
r
.0 li J
FOPS-- Var G
ILL U1✓1!llAw,Trr 51
n
Ag
I
i
C5
0
Y
1
Z-4
Q
Excerpt from the Village Specific Plan
6.5 Signs
6.5.1 Budding Signs
- Every sign shall have good scale and proportion
in its design and in its visual relationship to
buildings and surroundings.
- Every sign shall be designed as an integral
architectural element of the building and site to
which it principally relates.
- The colors, materials, and lighting of every
sign shall be restrained and harmonious with
the building and site to which it principally
relates.
- Signs on glazed tie with indirect lighting are to
be encou,aged.
- Back I? (box or can) signs are to be
discouraged, directly illuminated signs shall be
limited to individual letters. Exposed bulb or
garish neon lighting is prohibited.
- The number of graphic elements on a sign shall
be held to the minimum needed to convey the
sign's major message and shall be composed in
proportion to the area of the sign face.
- Accessory signs shall be given the same careful
consideration of approval as that given for main
signs.
- Each sign shall be compatible with signs on
adjoining premises and shall not compete for
attention.
- Identification signs of a prototype design and
corporation logos shall conform to the criteria
for all other signs.
BOOK STORE S BOUTIQUE
RESTAURANT mir Mn/OORK
4.8.7 Signs
Good signage is very important. Control over sign
on private property will be handled through the
City's sign ordinance and by the additiorw
standards contained in this Specific Plan. But there
is a whole array of signs that the City itself will be
responsible for, which include directional signs
street signs, traffic signs and informational signs.
The signs used in the Village should differ frorr
signs used elsewhere in the City. This wil help tc
reinforce the uniqueness of the Village. Village
signs should have a special design that reflects the
character of the Village itself. Ideally there shoulc
be a special logo for the Village which wi0 appear or
all Village related signs.
Directional signs to the Village should be placed a•
or near the main highway entrances to the city,
particularly Highway Ill. Washington Street, and
Jefferson Street. Since the Village Is not located on
one of the major arterials in the Coachella Valley,
people must be informed on how to get there. Hence
the significance of the directional signs. Vilage
directional signs should be Incorporated with other
directional signing, in order to reduce sign
proliferation.
prj /Or to
V
--_
;- -
JAN26
393
s�
WASTER SIuN PPOGkaM FOR
PLAZA TAMPICO
Prepared For
La Ouinta Medical Plaza Ltd.
Vl
imperial Sign Company, Inc.
Indios California
EXHIBIT
��_CASENO. f'Z�
,
or .,,' 6,t,:P, A�
APPRG'1E� DIVISION
f� w t 1 ,:tr y( 51/-i I
' OG 2 of IOI
_/►.. mdSLBr 6iOn Or vure6• iw' . bSa a ;:arinate neCeSSiLV.-
�a-,C:or', :s 'e--
-ha proyra� "'er3 si.;ns that t`•a r ,moons:ble for
<-ar•t si gnaga.
she 3-.fief -t .:y- grou ps are as follows:
pr=mary d•.rectional signs, Secondary directional signs.
Tr�4ic regulatory. and T=Snant signs-
A11 proposed Exterior Signage is to be submitted for approval to:
La Quinta Medical Plaza LTD
500 South Sepulveda, Suiteia #4 0
Los Angeles.
Once approved. the City of La guinta Planning Department will
have to see scaled drawings. supplied by a lick sign
contractor-
In developing the Sign Criteria, one must keep the five basic
categories of good signage in prospectiveg and those aret
Direction. Information• Identification Regulation and/or
Information Displays.
SIGN GROUP ,MONUMENT•
The existing monument will consist of 10' }{elvetica tfediuo
Oxidized Bronze Letters stud mounted to both sides of bases to'
reads
PLAZA TAMPICO
SIGN GROUP PP (Plot Plan)
LANDLORD - SECONDARY DIRECTIOtAAL SIGNS: These signs are tp be
located so that they follow and offer reinforcement to the
Primary Sign Group. For instance, Directory Cabinet close to
curb. listing Tenants within. along with A Plot Plan.
Approximately 41x4' free standabng plot eled pPPlan Cabinet. located
inside the Tampico entrance.
EXHIBIT 6�-
i1 CASE NO. "u�
7;,WFi% REGULATOF.'f 3iu:at Signs :ocatee within the
a '_.,oat:r.; the =.-w :ra44:= :e. 21-:p signs, Do
%:Z Enter. or One way signs.
n£_c�VE PARK:%*G ONLY Signs: To be located at "P" locations on
tie p�OT PLAN". Approximately 7"x14" double faced sign with
p-c ._,,nd and Sr7w.o cooti• Signs to be installed On 6 tvot
iv�rY e_r_
steel ocsts.
SIGN SRGUP VP f'vis.t=r Parking)
VISITOR PARKING Signs: Approximately le"x24" single faced signs.
ur.e located at Plaza Ta,ao:co entrance, to direct visitors to
orooer larking areas.
SIGN GROUP S (Tenant Signs)
TENANT Signs: Exterior mounted signage (City permit and Landlord
approval needed).
FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION:
In general, Imperial Sign Company has written the sign program,
and is familiar with Landlord and City requirements. All
exterior signage is to comply with City of La ouinta's Sign and
Building Codes in conjunction with La ouinta Medical Plaza
peopl e.
Exterior signage is not to exceed one square foot of sign area
per lineal foot of frontage, or for a total of 50 square feet.
MATERIALS:
1/4" painted bronze aluminum letters for company name. Pictorial
type Logos may be constructed from different type of substrate,
if need be.
ILLUMINATION/NON-ILLUM:NATICN: (fG/`
Tenant may illuminate signage indirectly with fluorescent rack
•iyhtinq, with a low profile fixture to blend with building
to
pNDiOc Rpcw:r^c;
rW-2' than
aavar- s:�q services. Le=os are permitted as long a5
tie �•�;:: square foo*age is nc: e::=ceded.
;aLORS . -
All C^Dv ovi:: ce +necium oronze color. Tenants will be abie to
use *heir corporate colors within their pictorial type logos
fir.v.
T'rFE B�'rLE n,%r ..-JARACTER HEIGHT:
'.enact w:ii be free to use their corporate type style, as long as
Tenant
ooea .lot detract from the overall look of the structure.
Character heignt for company name not to exceed 14". Pictorial
Lego nay be proportionally larger.
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
All type styles, pictorial type logos and colors, still need
Landlord and City approval. All tenant signage is located on the
submitted "Plot Plan" and is labelled 'S". The proposed
individual painted bronze letters will be stud mounted into
plaster, at designated area on elevation print.
EXHIBIT
PO CASE N06 2f t-
9
M
13
P6,5ofty
0n I
L�s
.I a I
1 nlllrrrlllAaf✓m��II11111111AtI�11111���lAll�
o-)I.,rl 311
arm:►
P&GW10I
V
E
z
h Q
Q � >
y
�
Z
of
• Y'
i�
j
�1
�j
•�I
is
11
0 2 E
pG 'for-
e
wnennsnonw�nwiwnnwnn
I' ,
1
�I
Pp g of
I
/v 9 of
iz
N
14
I nnllll�l��l7�ll
lit
PC uaw, l
l
to / OF 2.
Tay D XP O&rO
78A05 CALLE ESTA00 • LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 • (6191 564-2246
April 25, 1989
Mr. Mark Ross Inc.
Imperial Sign Company,
46-120 Calhoun Street
Indio, California 92201
SUBJECT: PLAZA TAMPICO SIGN PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Ross:
The Planning and Development Department has reviewed the
above -referenced program, and has approved it in concept,
subject to the following conditions:
1, All signage submitted shall substantially conform to
locations as shown on Exhibit A (6 sheets), and the
descriptions as set forth in Exhibit 9 of the sign
program, except where the following conditions make
modifications, deletions, or additions.
2. Signage not poothe der sprogram mucshall conform to
chapter 9212fLaQuintaniipalCode.
3. The following
signage
it(s)re
quired:
permitted without further review
buildingor
a, Monument sign as proposed, if non -illuminated;
b, Anparking anddor trafficessary controldpurposesasignage for
only.
4. review 1( oinfee)igbyge theall Planningectand Development
Department prior to installation:
a, All tenant signage locations, size and design, and
colors;
b. Tennant directory sign.
g, The Landmark sign/logo shown on the Building B south
elevation (sheet 2 of S) is not permitted pursuant to
r
Section 9.212.120.C.1 of the La Quint& Municipal Code.
An adjustment from the Planning Commission may be
requested pursuant to 9.212.030.F for this signage.
6. Any illumination shall be limited to backlit
lettering/logos or back lighting located underneath
signage to be illuminated. Neon, channel -lettered, or
can -type signage is prohibited.
7. No pictorial logo may exceed 30 inches in height, unless
a written request to do so is approved by the Planning
and Development Director.
This sign program approval governs only the number, location,
and sign types to be permitted. No specific tennant signage
approvals are being implied; only the monument sign and
parking/traffic control signs may be installed as a result of
this approval.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do
not hesitate to call.
very truly yours,
JERRY BERMAN
PLA"ING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Wallace Nesbit
Associate Planner
wN/ad
cc: Bill Gates,.Code Enforcement officer
enclosures: Approved Exhibits A and B
1
I
c
E
r
• on
• �N
r � .
e
• �V
• -
•
Y
•
0 cc
e•
`a
c
`e
o
r r
r
Y
0
•
�w
L
rV
Y
Y
S
Y
YO
r
e
•
•
e.
L
Y
••
Y t
f
✓e
•
Y 3
Y
•
r •
i
e
•
Ok
•
Yw
4VVVVVV�
sc
�✓
33
::
;go
I
11 1pi� uq
i
1
a • AIrr*'mM�Nf. $
® CIO2
------
s
C
u
1
i
T
0
R E
PROPOSAL ONLY
DUNE 6. 1989 l
I Towe
ZANDHARR LAND 0.
18-140 CALLS I
LA QOINTA, CA 253
))3• :3�3) ro"507
TO: PAM
RE: TAMPICO SIGNAGE .�
(408) 899-180S
(408) 899-0903 PAX
16 w ®i
9
BRONZE LETTERS
,SATIN FINISR.DARAFBDGES�ROM 4ANDRTOZBEPSEALEDAI
ME MATERIAL
AS TREtN S CLEAR
-DURATH RONZB PROVIDED.
SHALL
1'6• HOLES DRILLED AND TAPPED
COST FOR LETTERING ONLY 1.850.00
SALES TAX,.PaCKING AND SHIPPING CRARGBS TO BE ADDED.
ALLOW FOUR TO SIX BEERS DELIVERY.
EXHIBIT Q
SINGER Y, A CASE NO. 8920'6
11 r
6 AZp 'fAt4 f lCD
CALIF jAh1fICA
vzc -Jr-4 li Y
i
78-105 CALLE ESTADO — LA OUiNTAA CALIFORNIA 92253 - (6191 554-2246
FAX (619) 564-6617
December 4, 1989
Ms. Lynn Jensen
Landmark Land Company
78-140 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON SA 89-106
Dear Ms. Jensen:
This is to inform you that that La Quinta Planning Commission,
at their meeting of November 28, 1989, did take the following
action regarding the above subject:
By minute motion, the Planning Commission granted
approval for Sign Application 89-106, subject to
conditions as set forth in the Staff Report previously
sent to you.
A copy of the Conditions is attached for your files, along with
the app:Dved sign exhibits.
Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.
very truly yours,
JERRY HERMAN
PLANNING L DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Wallace Nesbit
Associate Planner
WN/mr
attachments
cc: Code Enforcement Division
Tom Hartung, Building official
Affiftaiw
MR/LTRWN 0?n 3
I.�AI I G ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1!iO4 LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIACA�IFORNIA 94253
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SIGN APPROVAL NO. 89-106
NOVEMBER 28, 1989
1, Design and location of the approved signage shall be in
conformance with Exhibits A and B, as contained in the
file for SA #89-106, except where these conditions shall
take precedence.
2. This approval for SA #89-106 shall be used within one
year of the date of approval, or the approval shall
become null and void.
3. Prior to installation of the approved signage, Applicant
shall apply for and obtain a building permit through the
Planning and Development Department.
BJ/CONAPRVL.028 - 1 - Q jC
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993
CASE NO: PLOT PLAN 93-498
APPLICANT: STONINGTON PROPERTIES
ARCHITECT: MARVICK-LANG, INC., ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A PLOT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
7,000 SQ. FT. RETAIL PAD BUILDING.
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111 APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET
EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET, WITHIN THE ONE ELEVEN LA
QUINTA CENTER.
BACKGROUND:
General Description:
The subject property is a pad site (J-1) within the One Eleven La Quinta Center. This pad is
located just slightly to the east of the Albertsons supermarket near Highway 111. The pad is
located on the east side of the closest right-in/right-out only driveway near Washington Street.
Across the west side of the drive way is the recently approved Carl's Jr.
Site Design:
The building is a rectangular structure laid out parallel to Highway 111. The building which
is tentatively shown split into five shops would have their front doors facing the north or onto
the parking lot. Along the east and south would be secondary private accesses. A trash
enclosure is shown within the parking area near the southeast corner of the building.
The building is setback 28-feet from the Highway I I I right-of-way as allowed by the approval
of the Specific Plan for the shopping center. The applicant is showing a slight encroachment
of approximately four feet for two small trellis structures over the rear doors. Along the west
side property line, adjacent to the driveway, the setback varies from a minimum of 11-feet and
a maximum of 17-feet near the northerly end.
DRBST.093 1
• -U L, 03 7
Architectural Design:
The structure has been designed in a manner that is architecturally similar to the main shopping
center area. The building utilizes a tile roof, stucco walls, a small amount of wood trellis trim,
tile accent, and tower features similar to those used in the shopping center. Along the east and
south elevations of the buildings, the face of one of the tower structures would be faced with a
painted metal lattice which would support landscape vines. Around the glass areas an overhang
of approximately five feet is provided.
The height of the building varies from a maximum of 24.5± feet for the tower structure with
the main building being 19.5± feet high.
Signage:
The signage has not been shown on the buildings. However, the approved sign program does
provide for signage on these types of structures. It would be appropriate to utilize the sign
program for these rental spaces.
Landscaping:
The applicant has submitted a conceptual landscaping plan showing a plant pallet which consists
of plants that are for the most part utilized throughout the shopping center.
ANALYSIS:
In summary, Staff feels that the proposed project conceptually is acceptable. We do feel that
several items should be noted as follows:
1. Along the north and west elevations, the applicant has provided tower structures. One
tower is a gable type tower while the other is a rounded arch with a two step column.
It may be more appropriate to have both towers to be the same.
2. As previously indicated, there are small narrow trellis type structures over the rear doors
in two locations facing Highway 111. These encroach slightly into the setback area.
While they do encroach into the setback area they do provide additional architectural
treatment and screen the doors from view. These trellis structures could be eliminated
or left as is or the building could be moved further north in order to eliminate or
minimize the encroachment. The landscape plan indicates a bougainvillea vine will be
planted on the south face of the trellis.
3. During the consideration of Taco Bell, the Planning Commission eliminated the use of
Fountain Grass completely. This is in order to insure that the White Fountain Grass is
not mistakenly planted in place of the Purple Fountain Grass. White Fountain Grass is
an agricultural pest which seeds freely and is to a certain extent, creating problems in
some areas of the Valley. It would be appropriate to eliminate its use here.
DRBST.093 2
n3�
3. The proposed signage should comply with the adopted sign program. The building is
designed in a manner which dictates that the adopted sign program be used.
SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The sign program for the building shall comply with the adopted sign program for the
center.
2. Perimeter landscaping shall be modified and designed to blend in with the new
landscaping. Should any retaining walls be necessary adjacent to the perimeter
landscaping, they shall be provided by the applicant as required by the Planning and
Development Director.
3. The Fountain Grass shall be eliminated from the plant pallet.
4. All exterior colors shall match those utilized within the shopping center.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend that you review the plans in light of the above noted comments and
suggested conditions. Your recommendation will be forwarded on to the Planning Commission
for their consideration.
Attachments:
1. Location map
2. Plan exhibits, including plot plan, floor plan, landscape plan, and elevations.
DRBST.093
3
033
161-0-1
Llaw
I
LOCATION MAP
-case NO. 13- S
040
041
r° V >
rh5 �,�' l�n `�9�
"a _ �, -- _
P
�
»
\
rg
||
,|
.|
!
�
|t
!
BI #E
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993
CASE NO: PLOT PLAN 93-497
APPLICANT: MORITE OF CALIFORNIA (RED ROBIN RESTAURANT)
ARCHITECT: ARCH NET
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A PLOT PLAN APPLICATION TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,280 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH
OUTDOOR SEATING.
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111 APPROXIMATELY 950 FEET
EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET WITHIN THE ONE ELEVEN LA
QUINTA CENTER.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is a pad site (L-1) within the One Eleven La Quinta Center. The pad is
located to the east side of the driveway across from Simon Drive.
The proposed Red Robin restaurant will consist of 7,280 square feet of interior floor space with
approximately 1500 square feet of outdoor patio area.
Site Design:
The structure is a irregularly shaped square type structure with the main entry off the northwest
corner of the building. The outdoor seating is located to the west side of the building with
service access to the east side of the building. The parking lot surrounds the building on the
west, north, and east sides with Highway 111 to the south.
The submitted plans show the trash enclosure along the east side between the building and
parking spaces. It has been determined that this location will not work properly; therefore, the
applicant has agreed to relocate the trash enclosure into the parking lot in the location of a
parking space which can be deleted.
DRBST.094 1
Architectural Design:
The structure has been designed in a manner which is architecturally similar to the main
shopping center and automobile club building. The building utilizes a tile roof, stucco walls,
and screen wall and wood trellis over the outdoor eating area. The tile roof is utilized as a
mansard roof along a portion of the north elevation and south elevation. These mansard roofs
are designed to be similar to those used in the Automobile Club building. Over the entry into
the restaurant will be a rounded arch tower similar to that utilized within the shopping center.
The cornice treatment at the top of the parapet will match that utilized within the shopping
center. The bases of the columns will also utilize the same adequin tile used for the tower bases
in the shopping center. The windows used in the restaurant will be recessed eight inches from
the face of the adjacent columns on the north, west, and south elevations
The height of the structure at its highest point which is the entry tower will be 22-feet 6-inches.
The plans indicate that the majority of the building will be 20-feet in height.
Signage
The applicant has indicated signage for the structure. Over the entry on the arch structure will
be "Red Robin" (2' X 11.5" or 23: square feet) in internally illuminated red letters. On the
north elevation the applicant proposes a 4'2" diameter (13.8± square feet) "Red Robin" logo
which includes the words "Red Robin" with a bird logo and some script. This logo is also
proposed on the east elevations of the building. This logo will be 5'6" in diameter or 23.7±
square feet. On the west elevation of the building a "Red Robin" with "Burger and Spirits
Emporium" below the name is proposed. These signs would have "Red Robin" in red with
"burgers", etc. in white with a black background in a can. These signs would be approximately
4' X 15' or 60 square feet. All signs are proposed to be internally illuminated. On the north
elevation would be a "Red Robin" (11.5' X 2' or 23± square feet). Below that would be a 4'T,
diameter (13.8± square feet) logo.
Landscaping:
The applicant has submitted a preliminary landscaping plan for the area immediately surrounding
the structure. Additionally, the landscape plan does show the existing landscaping adjacent to
Highway 111. The majority of the landscaping proposed are low water users similar to that
utilized within the shopping center. The primary tree used is the Mexican Fan Palm with the
parking lot trees proposed to be 36-inch box African Sumac.
ANALYSIS:
In summary, Staff feels that the proposed project conceptually is acceptable. We do feel that
several items should be noted as follows:
1. As previously indicated the trash enclosure will be moved to an area within the parking
lot. The trash enclosure should comply with the City and Waste Management of the
Desert standards which require the gates to be solid metal and be mounted on steel poles
DRBST.094 2
n4�,
embedded in concrete. Additionally, a 6 to 8-inch curb around the inside of the trash
enclosure is required to minimize damage to the enclosure. The back of the trash
enclosure should be designed for walk-in access without opening the main doors.
2. Along the east side of the building, additional vertical landscaping in the form of
screening type materials should be utilized to provide relief to the expanse of the building
wall.
3. The Mexican Fan Palms should vary in height with the minimum height being 8-feet.
4. All south and west windows should be solar type glass in order to minimize heat gain.
5. The irrigation system should be a drip type system except for annual color areas
6. The sign program will need to be approved by the Planning Commission sign it is for a
national tenant and not in conformance with the adopted sign program. No sign should
exceed 50 square feet. Additionally, Staff feels the main entry is not a "fifth" side to the
building and deserving a 23± square foot sign. Possibly a small pedestrian oriented sign
would be appropriate here.
SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The trash enclosure shall be relocated into the parking lot area and comply with City and
Waste Management design requirements including solid metal doors mounted on steel
poles embedded in concrete, 6 to 8-inch curb around the inside of the trash enclosure,
and a concrete pad in front of the door access. Additionally, the back of the enclosure
shall be designed for walk in without needing to open front doors.
2. Mexican Fan Palms shall vary in height and be a minimum of 8-feet tall.
3. African Sumac tree shall be minimum 36-inch box size.
4. Irrigation system shall be drip system except for annual color areas.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend that the Design Review Board review the plans in light of the above
comments. Your recommendation will be forwarded onto the Planning Commission for their
consideration.
Attachment:
1. Location map
2. Plan exhibits (including plot plan, floor plan, elevation plans, and landscaping plans).
DRBST.094 3
5400 SG
n
N 1 J
'iN 1 600 S f
j m <.
,6005�? -
600 Sv
mo
SM075 _
800 S -
m7.
➢ �""'"""""""� 1 zoo S F-
� �a
e....,... I MAJOR v
I`.
v %sue[
v. ...vc ➢OY r �
8mZ i i
Y
L_
_no
�oY _
f.N f
•I t O J
u ,in _
lS n
a =
l^S�`• 'µ��`C� 8 N� Z
nonw a5a EXMitii7
QKxr� m " r+
CASE NOAA- Gil
n
.AN
V'/
I
{
ti
9
t
i
S I tj
t
L
k
47
0; 1 RED ROBIN RESTAURANT
N ��� OM[[l[V[M LI OVIMTA Gitl�� C�_
LA ONMTA,CALIIO. "\
O �LOt"Celf "L'OlfM) N rl rl•1 q u �T
RED ROBIN RESTAURANT
OM" "LMM LA OUIMT"
LA OUII{TA,CALI/OIINIA
P
li
2
c
t=aGAA
RED ROBIN RESTAURANT etp�!'�
o a+e sieve+ a out+*A
LA +UWA.CA.LIA0++11
RED ROSIN RESTAURANT
exa auvex a omxu
y6[l iR[F
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
v o
y4 RED ROBIN RESTAURANT
C C • ONE ELEVEN LA WMTA
0 LA WMTA, CALWON[AA
11 0 R
BI *F
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993
CASE NO: PLOT PLAN 93-501
APPLICANT: WINCHESTER ASSET MANAGEMENT (FOR LA QUINTA GOLF
PROPERTIES)
ARCHITECT: MONIGHAN ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE
LOCATION: "THE QUARRY" LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF LAKE
CAHUILLA
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is "The Quarry" project which was approved by the City Council on May
4, 1993. The plans included a clubhouse located near the easterly end of the project adjacent
to the entry road (Schwabaker Road). The Conditions of Approval require that the Design
Review Board and Planning Commission review and approve the plans. Additionally, the
conditions stipulates that the architecture be "similar with colors, materials, etc., indigenous to
the surrounding desert environment".
The applicant has submitted plans for the clubhouse facility. These plans include floor plans,
roof plans, exterior elevations, sections views, preliminary grading plans, and preliminary
landscaping plans. Additionally, colored renderings of the proposed facility have been
submitted.
SITE DESIGN:
The structure is somewhat rectangular in design with the long axis of the building running in a
north/south direction. The clubhouse facility includes a restaurant with an outside covered
veranda, locker rooms, a pro shop, offices, and a lower level cart storage area. The size of the
building will be 29,800± square feet.
The clubhouse is located on the easterly end of the old rock and gravel pit which ceased
operation several years ago. The golf course is being designed to be located within the
excavated pit area with the clubhouse located somewhat above the floor of the gravel pit on the
sloped perimeter. Because of this, the clubhouse has been designed as a split level structure.
DRBST.095 1
_<,.. 05-
From the east side which appears to be one story, one would enter the restaurant, locker and pro
shop level. The golf cart storage would be located at the rear of the clubhouse at the lower
level.
The main drop off area and entry to the clubhouse would be located in the middle of the east
side of the clubhouse. Most of the parking would be located to the north and south of the
clubhouse area. The delivery area is located at the north end of the clubhouse with access to
the main street which runs north/south along the eastern boundary of the property.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN:
0
The applicant has submitted plans which fe feels comply with the "indigenous" requirement.
The exterior materials utilized in the structure will consist of the following:
1. Cal -slate concrete flat roof slate tile (grey -blue).
2. Metal roof trellis structures to screen the mechanical roof units with a matching metal
roof trellis (dark blue -grey color) over exposed mini lambs utilized in various portions
of the building.
3. Beige cement plaster walls used in the upper portion and light grey used on the lower
portion (below 3'0").
4. Pale yellow wood columns will be utilized around the structure especially on the west
elevation supporting the roof over the veranda area. This wood columns will also be
utilized around the entry area on the east elevation.
5. Earth tones stone veneer will be utilized adjacent to the main entry area on the east
elevation around each exterior door and on the west elevation along the lower barn cart
level. This store is to be similar to that existing in surrounding mountains.
6. Wood windows trim with the color to be white.
7. Along the west elevation at the veranda level there will be a low metal railing utilized
between the wood columns.
8. A wood entry trellis will be provided over the main entry into the clubhouse.
As viewed from the east or entry into the clubhouse the height of the structure will be
approximately 26-feet. Due to the grading of the site, along the west elevation which is at the
rear the height will appear to be approximately 38-feet. However, the highest point of the
structure is actually setback and at the level of the clubhouse entry. If you review the north
elevation on Sheet A-6.1, this can be seen.
DRBST.095 z
ns�
SIGNAGE:
No signage for the clubhouse is indicated on either the site plan or elevations plans. The signage
will need to be reviewed and approved at a later time.
LANDSCAPING:
The applicant has submitted a preliminary landscaping plan for the parking lot area and the area
surrounding the clubhouse. The plant pallet consists of a variety of plants most of which are
low water users. The plant material in general consists of a variety desert type and non -desert
originated material.
Lawn use is limited to the area adjacent to the perimeter road leading into the parking lot and
adjacent to the front entry of the clubhouse.
ANALYSIS:
As previously indicated, the Conditions of Approval require plot plan review of this application.
This clubhouse is required to have the architecture, colors, materials, etc., be indigenous to the
surrounding desert environment. Whether this is achieved by this submittal, is subject to
review. In general, Staff feels that the plans submitted may not reflect what we consider to be
architecture indigenous to the surrounding mountainous area.
As a result of Staff's review of the plans, we would like to offer the following comments:
1. It is not apparent where the trash enclosure is located. Therefore provisions for trash
should be provided.
2. The kitchen area is provided with a flat roof and visually appears to architecturally
conflict with the rest of the building. The roof eaves around the buildings varies with
a minimum of three feet. Over the west facing veranda the overhang is 15± feet.
Except for extreme early morning and late afternoon times, it is probably sufficient to
provide acceptable shading of the glass area.
3. While the landscaping does contain many desert species of landscaping, it also contain
planting materials not indigenous to the immediate area. It has been proposed and
approved that the golf course area will contain planting which is the same as that existing
in the area. The use of additional plant material is probably acceptable in this location
as a transitional type of planting.
SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The trash enclosure area shall be provided or identified which is in compliance with the
requirements of the City and the local trash company. Plans for the trash enclosure shall
be reviewed and approved by the department of Planning and Development.
DRBST.095 3 _ n 5 �+
RECOMMENDATION:
In light of the above comments, the Design Review Board should review the submitted plans and
determine the acceptability. Should you take action to recommend approval, your
recommendation will be forwarded on to the Planning Commission for their approval.
Attachments:
1. Location map
2. Partial conceptual site plan showing location of clubhouse area
3. Plan exhibits including floor plan, roof plan, elevation plans, section views, preliminary
grading plan, and preliminary landscaping plans.
DRBST.095 4
w
■
Ls Quints
8
LA QUINTA QUADRANGLE.
r�
c:
9
ai
o
21
1 l
29i f ra .a ',1/ 28
�
° � � 81TEr _ _
I N :e
c r �
1
,32 33 ,
MP
I
The Quarry
s
Ttm
KUM
i�
'�'MARTINEZ MTN.,CALIF
11■I■II■II�11■■■IIAIIIII
SAND DUNE
iV
Y
PRACTICE ARLA
a -CLUBHOUSE
i
IAIN ENTRY
1
►
PUTTING
GREEN
1
I
Q
► N
BI #G
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
DATE: JUNE 2, 1993
CASE NO: SPECIFIC PLAN 84-004
APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT (CHARLES R. STROTHER)
ARCHITECT/
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT: ROBERT LAMB HART
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR ENTRY DESIGN ON
WASHINGTON STREET AND REVIEW OF GENERAL
ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES FOR THE ORCHARD PROJECT
(PREVIOUSLY THE PYRAMIDS).
LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET AT EISENHOWER DRIVE
BACKGROUND:
This specific plan was originally approved in November, 1984 as the Pyramids. The project
allows a maximum 1500 residential units, two 18-hole golf courses, and related recreational
facilities and 80 guest cottages. A Development Agreement for the project was recorded in
January, 1986, which maintains the Conditions of Approval and extend the approval period.
The property was recently acquired by the applicant from the Resolution Trust Corporation
(RTC). The new applicants have begun restoring the existing 18-hole golf course which has
been constructed adjacent to Washington Street. The applicants are now requesting approval of
an entry design for Washington Street.
SITE DESIGN:
The plan submitted at this time is for the entry area only and does not include the perimeter
landscaping along Washington Street. The plan utilizes a formal Date Palm planting pattern
through the driveway area and surrounding planted area. Outside of the Date Palm area is a
citrus grove affect which will be achieved through the planting of grapefruit trees. The access
will utilize an 18-foot in -lane and 18-foot exit lane separated by a 24-foot wide area which will
be partially planted. Through this driveway area there will be an exposed aggregate paving
pattern utilized with smooth concrete bands.
DRBST.096 1
0,5c
A guard house will be provided with wooden vehicular gates. Additional planting materials will
include Bougainvillea on top of a 2.5-foot high screen wall and ten foot perimeter wall.
Adjacent to the driveway area there will be lawn areas which can be utilized for temporary
parking.
ARCHITECTURE:
The applicant has chosen a "early California Hacienda" or Mexican style architecture for the
project. This is reflected in the guard house and gate entry area. The exterior materials will
consist of a tile roof, stucco walls, and wood trellises and beams. The height of the proposed
guard house will be 13±-feet.
SIGNAGE:
Signage for the project has not yet been submitted and is proposed to be submitted as a separate
item at a later date. Signage is proposed on the short wall between the two lanes
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES:
The applicant has submitted an exhibit which shows photographs of different architectural
features which he wishes to utilize within his project and are reflected in the gate house. This
exhibit shows what Staff would consider to be authentic old Mexican architecture. This includes
stone paving, Bougainvillea draped walls, terracotta tile roofs, wood gates and grilles, stone
work walls, and deeply recessed windows and doors, wood beams and wood carved lintels, and
warm white stucco over concrete block construction. This exhibit will be available at the at the
meeting for your review.
The applicant has submitted this to show the Board the architectural theme chosen for the project
and to receive comment.
ANALYSIS:
Staff feels that the architectural concept shown for the project is attractive and would have an
ambiance similar to the La Quinta Hotel.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend that you review the plans in light of the above noted comments. Your
recommendation will be forwarded on to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Staff
does recommend that any future signage be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to its
fabrication.
Attachments:
1. Location map
2. Exhibit book including site plan, floor plan, elevation views
DRBST.096 2 nC,'J
EISENHOWER DR
ENTRY LOCATION
LOCATION MAP
SPECIFIC PLAN 84-004
061
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CITY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California
May 5, 1993
I. CALL TO ORDER
5:30 P.M.
A. Chairman Harbison brought the meeting to order at 5:33 P.M. and Boardmember
Curtis led the flag salute.
II. ROLL CALL
A. Present: Boardmembers Fred Rice, John Curtis, James Campbell, Planning
Commission Representative Barrows, and Chairman Harbison. Boardmember
Anderson arrived at 5:45 P.M.
B. Boardmember Curtis moved to excuse Boardmember Wright. Boardmember Rice
seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
C. Staff present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell,
and Department Secretary Betty Anthony.
Boardmembers Campbell/Curtis moved to reorganize the agenda moving Item #1 to the end of
the agenda. Unanimously approved.
III. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Conditional Use Permit 93:007; a request of McDonalds for approval to construct
and operate a fast food, drive-thru restaurant located within the 111 La Quinta
Center on Highway 111.
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the
Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development
Department.
2. Boardmember Curtis asked if Council had made any changes to the Taco
Bell submittal that should apply to this application. Staff stated there were
none.
DRB5-5
1
0
Design Review Board Minutes
May 5, 1993
3. Chairman Harbison inquired about the menu board. Staff stated this
would be reviewed by the Planning Commission as an adjustment.
4. Boardmember Curtis questioned the size of the revised logo sign.
Discussion followed regarding the size of the sign. Chairman Harbison
stated it was 12 square feet and Boardmember Rice stated the red
background made the logo stand out.
5. Mr. Rob Jenkins, construction project manager for McDonalds, spoke
regarding the logo sign on the building. Chairman Harbison asked if Mr.
Jenkins had any objections to the staff conditions. Mr. Jenkins stated he
had no objections, but inquired how many trees would be required to
screen the play structure (Condition #1). Staff stated they would prefer
a minimum of three trees. Boardmember discussed the location of the
trees with Mr. Jenkins.
6. Chairwoman Barrows asked Mr. Jenkins to replace the Purple Fountain
Grass that the plans called for to eliminate the change of White Fountain
Grass mistakenly being planted. Mr. Jenkins stated he would.
7. Boardmember Campbell asked if the flagpole was the same height as
Carl's Jr. Staff stated it was. He then asked if the "McDonalds" sign
could be reduced in size. Mr. Jenkins stated that all their signs were
premade and this sign was already in production. He indicated a smaller
sign was available.
8. Boardmember Anderson stated he felt the sign overpowered the building.
9. Chairwoman Barrows stated she felt the "M" was what the public
identified not the sign "McDonalds". Discussion followed regarding the
size and color of the signs.
10. Boardmember Anderson asked how the tile would be tied in behind the
tower arches. Mr. Jenkins stated it was tied into the back structure of the
wall. Discussion followed regarding the tower treatment on the north
elevation.
11. Boardmember Campbell inquired why another stucco parapet couldn't be
tied into the back of the tower arches. Mr. Jenkins stated the mechanical
equipment filled the roof area. Discussion followed regarding different
possibilities. Chairman Harbison felt the Planning Commission would
want the same continuity as Carl's Jr, was required to have. Mr. Jenkins
stated he would eliminate three rows of the tile and dress up the back of
the parapet. The Board concurred with doing this.
DRB5-5 2 - 0 6 �
Design Review Board Minutes
May 5, 1993
12. Boardmember Campbell asked Mr. Jenkins to clarify what the material on
the screen wall and trash enclosure was to be. Mr. Jenkins stated it was
painted concrete. Discussion followed regarding the problems with
graffiti and repairing the wall. Boardmember Campbell stated he felt that
a fence would be better than a block wall. In addition, the height detector
pole sign should not have the yellow letters on bronze. It was suggested
they be red.
13. Following the discussion, it was moved by Boardmembers
Anderson/Campbell to recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit 93-
007 subject to the following conditions:
a. Three trees would be required to screen the play structure from
view of Highway 111.
b. The "McDonalds" sign would be the next standard size down.
C. The screen wall to be block with slurry finish and painted.
d. The letters on the height detector pole sign would be red with a
yellow background.
e. The north facade tower shall have a full plaster return with the
three rows of tile removed.
Unanimously approved.
B. Plot Plan 93-496; a request of Bill Howard (Mumbil) for approval of exterior
modification to a commercial building located at 78-029 Calle Estado.
DRB5-5
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and
Development Department.
2. Boardmember Anderson stated the different plate heights caused an
illusion of the addition being off center. He stated his concern that by
tieing the two unreinforced structures together would not allow the
building to move during an earthquake. He had no objections to the arch
architecturally.
3. Mr. Bill Howard, owner, stated the building is connected and always has
been and had been reinforced and approved by the Building and Safety
Department. He further stated he would like to keep the arch but was
willing to eliminate the tower facade. Boardmembers discussed the
building surface materials with Mr. Howard.
3
0 6,,
Design Review Board Minutes
May 5, 1993
4. Boardmember Anderson expressed his concern about the thickness of the
arch. Boardmember Curtis expressed his concern that the facade could
create a problem in an earthquake. Members expressed their desire to see
the building remain in its original state.
5. Following the discussion, it was moved and seconded by Boardmembers
Anderson/Campbell to deny the plot plan as submitted, but would be
willing to consider a new proposal. Unanimously approved.
C. Plot Plan 93-495 (Revision); a request of Simon Plaza to develop a mixed use
commercial project on approximately 5.6 acres zoned C-P-S commercial located
at the southeast corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street.
DRB5-5
1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in
the Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and
Development Department.
2. Boardmember Curtis asked if the parking was at grade. Staff stated that
some were two story. He then asked why the curb line was tapered back
so far. Staff stated it was based on what the Engineering Department
required for street widening.
3. Boardmember Campbell asked Staff what the height limit was. Staff
stated four stories or 50-feet was allowed in the C-P-S Zone.
4. Mr. Phil Pead, President, discussed the height changes with the Board
5. Boardmember Rice asked if this was to be a medical building. Mr. Pead
stated it would be with outpatient surgery, urgent care, etc.
6. Mr. Pead expressed his concern that the meandering sidewalk would end
at a block wall at the existing Simon Motors site. He further requested
that the landscaping at the parking structure required in Condition #74
needed to be eliminated. Boardmember Anderson stated he felt the
parking structure needed to be integrated more with the building. The
building design features needed to be carried into the parking structure.
7. Mr. Pead stated the parking structure did have an appearance of being
stuck there, but time constraints didn't allow other design alternatives. He
stated they would berm and heavily landscape the Highway 111 elevation.
4
n
6� c
Design Review Board Minutes
May 5, 1993
DRB5-5
8. Boardmember Curtis stated this was an opportunity for public and private
cooperation and he felt this would be an asset to the corner.
9. Boardmember Anderson stated he needed to see the design in whole, not
piece meal.
10. Chairman Harbison stated he felt that large palm trees needed to be used
to soften the building height.
11. Boardmember Campbell stated that the elevations on Sheet #3 did not
show the elevators for the parking structure. Mr. Pead stated they had not
determined their location as of yet. Boardmember Campbell asked what
the material would be around the opening. Mr. Pead stated stucco
ornamentation with different stucco colors.
12. Boardmember Campbell asked about the window treatment. Mr. Pead
stated he would prefer to use the inside grid window treatment.
Discussion followed regarding the two different styles.
13. Boardmember Campbell stated the building needed color where the two
buildings met. Discussion followed regarding alternatives to the parking
structure and the building in regards to the roof on the south elevation.
14. Planning Commissioner Barrows stated she felt there were too many
window on the south and west elevations with no allowance for shade.
Members discussed the window treatment and Title 24 (State Energy
Code).
15. Boardmember Campbell stated he felt the elevator tower needed to be
eliminated; the ramp parking structure side wall should be comprised of
stone versus stucco for aesthetics reasons; and there needed to be a tower
effect on the circular building popouts.
16. Boardmember Curtis questioned the roof pitch of the main structure. He
also wanted to see the eight foot wide bikepath remain based on the City's
General Plan Goals and Policies.
17. Mr. Skip Berg, sign representative, stated he would answer any questions
the Board might have regarding the sign program. Boardmember Curtis
asked if he had any objections to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Berg
stated he had no objections except for Condition #28 as they would like
to have their monument sign at the intersection. Discussion followed
5
n 6c
Design Review Board Minutes
May 5, 1993
DRB5-5
regarding the sign. Staff explained the history of the sign. Mr. Berg
stated the sign needed to be at the corner for identification. Boardmember
Curtis stated that Staff needed to work with the developer to come to
some compromise.
Staff suggested modifying Condition #7. Boardmember Rice stated he felt
the Board should approve the project and let the City Council and
Planning Commission deal with the sign problem.
18. Boardmember Campbell stated he felt the location was agreeable and
asked why the logo was so similar to Simon Motors. Mr. Berg stated that
Mr. Simon was an investor in the project. Boardmember Campbell asked
if signs #2 and #2a were eliminated. Mr. Berg stated that #2a was
originally omitted and only added because of the six foot wall that was
blocking the sign.
19. Boardmember Anderson stated he felt the curb cut would direct the
customers. Mr. Berg stated that the six foot wall would block all of it.
20. Boardmember Campbell asked what signs #3 and #3a would be made out
of. Mr. Berg stated they would be reverse pan channel and set against the
wall. Discussion followed regarding the sign materials.
21. Boardmember Anderson stated his concern for approving a project without
all the suggestions being incorporated into the conditions and visually
seeing the revised plans. Discussion followed.
22. Following the discussion, it was moved and seconded by Boardmembers
Harbison/Curtis to recommend approval in concept of Plot Plan 93-495
(Revision) requiring the applicant to return to the Design Review Board
with the improved drawings in one month to show the revision of the
items discussed. Boardmember Anderson asked for a clarification of the
motion. Members discussed in length with Staff what approving in
concept meant. Following the discussion, Chairman Harbison asked for
a roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Boardmembers Curtis, Rice,
Anderson, Campbell, Planning
Commissioners Barrows, and
Chairman Harbison. NOES: None.
ABSENT: Boardmember Wright.
ABSTAINING: None.
a
0 6 (,
Design Review Board Minutes
May 5, 1993
Chairman Harbison declared a break to give the Boardmembers an opportunity to view the sign
approval for Anchovie's restaurant. Break 8:49 to 9:01 P.M.
D. Sign Application 93-203; a continued request of Anchovie's Pizzeria (Mr.
Richard McCormick) to install an illuminated awning sign.
1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in
the Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and
Development Department.
2. Boardmember Curtis stated the Board needed to see more internal lighting
with fluorescent being incandescent.
3. Following a discussion, it was moved and seconded by Boardmembers
Anderson/Curtis to ask the applicant to have both alternatives available for
viewing at the next meeting of the Design Review Board. Unanimously
approved.
4. Following the vote, Staff informed the Board that the applicant had
withdrawn their request. Therefore, action taken by the Board became
null and void.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
Boardmembers Curtis/Rice moved and seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of
April 7, 1993, as submitted. Unanimously approved.
V. OTHER - None
VL ADJOURNMENT
It was moved and seconded by Boardmembers Anderson/Curtis to adjourn to a regular meeting
of the Design Review Board on June 2, 1993, at 5:30 P.M. This meeting of the La Quinta
Design Review Board was adjourned at 9:08 P.M., May 5, 1993.
DRB5-5