1993 11 03 DRBDESIGN REVIEW BOARD
A Regular Meeting to be held at the
La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California
November 3, 1993
5:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER - Flag Salute
II. ROLL CALL
III. BUSINESS SESSION
A. SIGN APPLICATION 93-228; a request of Bemardo Gouthier for approval of a
sign for his La Quinta Sculpture School and Park.
B, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-007 (AMENDMENT #1); a request of
McDonalds Corporation for approval of an amendment to the conditions of
approval for a conditional use permit which allows construction and operation of
a fast food restaurant with a drive-thru lane.
C. PLOT PLAN 93-512; a request of TD Desert Development (Chuck Strother) for
approval of preliminary landscaping plans, gated entrance, and administration
building for 48th Avenue.
D. PLOT PLAN 93-511; a request of TD Desert Development (Chuck Strother) for
approval of plans for a maintenance building for Rancho La Quinta project.
E. TRACT 23269; a request of Mr. Jim Crowell, Century Crowell Communities
(a.k.a. Century Homes) for approval of architectural plans for Phase VII of the
La Quinta Highlands tract - La Quinta Del Rey.
F. PLANS SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEVELOPER HANDOUTS
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR -
Approval of the Minutes for the regular meeting of the Design Review Board on October
6, 1993.
V. OTHER
VI. ADJOURNMENT
STUDY SESSION
November 1, 1993, Monday
4:00 P.M.
La Quinta City Hall Session Room
00�
BI # 1
DATE:
CASE NO.:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNER:
SIGN COMPANY:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
PROPOSAL:
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
NOVEMBER 3, 1993
SIGN APPLICATION 93-228
LA QUINTA SCULPTURE SCHOOL AND PARK
BERNARDO GOUTHIER
QUICK SIGNS
57-325 MADISON STREET
R-1-10,000
At the October 19, 1993, City Council meeting, the City Council approved the Public Use
Permit for this project. The Council also approved a minute motion directing the proposed sign
to be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to approval. The applicant is requesting
approval of a temporary free standing sign to be located immediately south of the proposed
public entrance off of Madison Street.
The overall dimensions of the sign are four feet tall by six feet wide with height of sign at seven
feet above ground. Materials consist of 1/2 inch plywood painted white with blue painted
lettering ten inches high.
ANALYSIS:
Chapter 9.212, Sign Re ulg ations, states that public uses, institutional uses, schools, nonprofit
foundations, and churches, when not otherwise located with other unrelated uses within a
multiple building complex or a multiple -tenant building, are permitted attached and/or
freestanding signage. The total aggregate area of all signs shall be fifty square feet. From the
total sign area, only one freestanding sign is permitted with a maximum sign area of twenty-five
square feet and a height of eight feet. Only two separate attached signs are permitted.
The applicant's requested freestanding sign totals 24 square feet which is under the maximum
area permitted, and thus complies with the requirements of the ordinance. No attached signs
are being, requested.
DRBST.104 1
no.,
i
The proposed location for the sign is within future right-of-way along Madison Street. The
applicant is aware of this and was conditioned to move this entry gates and fencing back
approximately 20 feet to the ultimate right-of-way line at the time he seeks approval to construct
a proposed art gallery on his property. At that time, the sign now proposed will also have to
be moved back and replaced with another sign. It is not known when the applicant might
construct the gallery necessitating the right-of-way improvements. Therefore, the proposed sign
is to be considered a permanent sign until that time. Staff recommends that a condition be
placed on this sign permit to require removal of the sign upon commencement of right-of-way
improvements required by construction of the proposed gallery.
The sign proposed states "La Quinta Sculpture Park and School". The use includes a school and
is the primary use required by the zone. The proposed blue lettering matches the blue color
found in the existing accent tile on the masonry entry gate, and the white painted perimeter
fence. Staff is on the opinion that the sign is plain, but does coordinate with the existing entry
tile and fence colors.
RECOMMENDATION:
By Minute Motion 93-_ approve Sign Application 93-228 for one freestanding sign, subject
to the attached Conditions of Approval.
Attachments:
1. Sign application
2. Location and site map
3. Conditions of Approval
4. Sign Exhibit
DRBST.104
2
019
color. material, copy and method of illumination indicated for
Attachment 1
case Number S/9 R3 -,ZasE
Date Received
PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION j�
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS i D Y
OCT 2 2 1993 .
A. The following shall be submitted by the Applicant to the Planning 6
Development Department at the time of permit application unless otherwise
modified by the Planning Director:
1. Completed sign application obtained from the City.
2. Appropriate sign plans with number of copies and exhibits as
required in the application.
3. Appropriate fees as established by Council resolution.
4. Letter of consent or authorization from property owner, or
lessor, or authorized agent of the building or premises upon
which the sign is to be erected.
B. Plans Required - Information required - the following information
must be shown on the sign plan:
1. Sign elevation drawing indicating overall and
letter/figure/design dimensions, colors, materials, proposed
copy and illumination method.
2. Site plan indicating the location of all main and accessory
signs existing or proposed for the site with dimensions,
color, material, copy and method of illumination indicated for
each.
3. Building elevations with signs depicted (for non -freestanding
signs).
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Applicant Bernardo Gouthier
Mailing Address P 0 Box 1566 LaQuintaCA.
: (619) 564-6464
Name of Business LaQuinta Sculpture Park
Type of Business Sculpture Park and School Phone: (619) 564-6464
Address of Business 57325 Madison St. LaQuinta, CA.
FORM.004/CS -1-
Sign Company Name Quick signs
Address 24893 Sunnymead Blvd. Mereno Vallerhone: (909) 243-1494
Sign Company Representative
Type of Signs Proposed: Painted wood Sign
Number Number
1_Free Standing Main Trade Sign
_Wall Mounted Directional Sign
_Temporary Offsite Advertising
Location of Proposed Signs Main Entrance to Park
Assessor's Parcel Number
Zone
Overall dimensions of sign (and of copy face if less) 48%72
Materials L" Plywood Painted White with Blue letters
Colors White with Blue letters
Type of Illumination None
Declared Value or Contra
Signature of Applicant
Signature of Property Ow
*(Written ,Authority May be Attached)
NOTE: Any false or misleading information shall be grounds for denial of
this application.
8.
FORM.004/CS -2-
Attachment 2
Ol•
R-2
R
R^I
60 TM
R-I I
I I
000
I.
SCOOL AND SCULPTURE PARK
PARKING ENTRANCE
.y.ae u
I '
I \
�
M
'
I I
EKISiINO
!� PRIJATE
ENTRANCE
__L
I
l
S 4.4p
J
�
\\�'
fI
1
MA
AVf
Yk
_ ...,,......._, .�..�., ..,.ii i,.. ....:.ern .... .... ..... _._J....
Attachment 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SIGN APPROVAL 93-228
LA QUINTA SCULPTURE SCHOOL AND PARK
NOVEMBER 3, 1993
Signage for this project shall be limited to the one freestanding sign indicated on Exhibit
"A.". Any additional advertising and directional signs shall be submitted for approval of
the Planning and Development Department pursuant to the requirements of Chapter
9.212, Sign Regulations.
This permit shall expire upon commencement of street improvements required for Phase
II of Public Use Permit 93-016, at which time the approved sign must be removed.
CONAPRVL.108
G' O E
10/29/1993 15:40 6195646611 SCLLPPARK
prom : FASTSI>VS 2>SMI ;sorer., Oalley CA (7141' 241-1496
PAGE 02
P01
rn I
O�
�..-(J�1, 002
BI #2
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1993
CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-007 (AMENDMENT #1)
APPLICANT: MC DONALDS CORPORATION
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHICH ALLOWS
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A FAST FOOD
RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE-THRU LANE.
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111 APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET
WEST OF ADAMS STREET WITHIN THE ONE ELEVEN LA
QUINTA CENTER.
BACKGROUND"
This conditional use permit was approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 1993, and
approved by the City Council on July 6, 1993, with amended conditions. The project is
presently under construction and in the framing stage.
REQUESTED MODIFICATION:
The plans which were approved for this project provide a five foot high masonry wall between
the drive--thru lane and Highway 111 to screen the vehicles within the drive-thru lane. Condition
#32 requires that there be shrub planting on the south side of the five foot high screen wall.
Condition #37 requires that the five foot high screen wall be constructed of slump block with
a slurry finish and painted. Condition #12 requires that the five foot high screen wall be stepped
at each end.
The applicant has requested that the wall be deleted and shrubs be utilized on top of the existing
berm to provide alternate screening.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REVIEW:
The issue of whether the wall should be deleted will be decided by the Planning Commission
and City Council. Although the argument for deletion of the wall is weak, the Design Review
Board should review the alternative to determine whether adequate screening of the drive-thru
lane will be provided as desired by the City Council if the wall is deleted.
DRBST.106 1
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING:
Although the project is presently under construction, staff has not granted final approval of the
landscaping plans. This is due to minor revisions being necessary. The applicant has made
those revisions and made the additional revisions as a result of this request. In place of the wall,
the applicant indicates landscaping which would be placed on top of the berm near the drive-thru
lane. The proposed alternative screening consists of a row of Euryops pectinatus (Gold Shrub
Daisy) in a five gallon size.
ANALYSIS:
With regards to the landscaping that the applicant has provided for screening, it should be noted
that Euryops have a short life span. As such, once they die and are removed, the screening
which is needed will not exist. It is unlikely that the planting would be replaced. Additionally,
the applicant has substituted Cycas revoluta (Sego Palms) for the previously proposed New
Zeeland flax. It should be noted that the Sego Palms in areas of sun will burn during hot
weather. These areas are south of the drive-thru lane next to the perimeter planting and in the
planter on the north side of the building between the drive-thru lane and parking spaces.
It should also be noted that if this request is approved to delete the five foot high wall, it will
still be necessary to construct a retaining wall adjacent to the cut berm in order to retain the soil.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS:
If this request is approved by the Planning Commission and City Council, staff would
recommend the following conditions be imposed:
1. A continuous shrub be provided at the northern end of the perimeter landscape berm with
the plant material to consist of Salmon Petite Oleanders, five gallons in size and planted
three feet on center, to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department.
2. Regardless of whether this request is approved, the Sego Palms located south of the
drive-thru lane on the south side of the building and in the planter on north side of the
building between the drive-thru lane and parking spaces be replaced with an alternative
plant. This plant shall be subject to the approval of the Planning and Development
Department.
Attachments:
1. Location map
2. Plan exhibits
3. Excerpts from applicable Conditions of Approval
4. Letter of request from applicant dated October 23, 1993
DRBST.106
2
a.a_,.l ply
1.
Conditions of Approval
CUP 92-007 - McDonalds Corporation
July 6, 1993
10. Sign approval includes use of menu board and directional signs which require a sign
*** adjustment.
11. All top wood pieces on all trellis' shall be a minimum 3-inch in dimension and spaced
no more than one foot on center.
12. The five foot high screen wall shall be stepped at the ends, to the satisfaction of the
Planning and Development Department.
13. Final landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Agricultural Commissioner
and the Coachella Valley Water District, prior to issuance of a building permit.
14. The flagpole shall be a maximum 40-feet high and both an American and California flag
may be flown. The size of each flag shall not exceed 3-feet by 5-feet.
CITY FIRE MARSHAL:
15. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1250 gpm for a two
hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure which must be available before any
combustible material is placed on the job site.
16. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (60 X 4' X 2-1/20),
located not less than 25-feet nor more than 165-feet from any portion of the building(s)
as measured along approved vehicular travelways.
17. Install panic hardware exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code.
18. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2AIOBC
in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
19. Install a Hood Duct automatic fire extinguishing system. System plans must be
submitted, along with a plan check/inspection fee, to the Fire Department for review.
20. Install Knox Lock Boxes, Models 4400, 3200, or 1300, mounted per recommended
standard of the Knox Company. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval of mounting location/position and operating standards. Special forms are
available from this office for the ordering of the Key Lock Boxes. This form must be
authorized and signed by this office for the correctly coded system to be purchased.
21. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed. A plan check fee
must be paid to the Fire Department at the time building plans are submitted.
CONAPRVL.085
Oz
Conditions of Approval
CUP 92-007 - McDonalds Corporation
July 6, 1993
31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and building permit for construction of any building
or use contemplated by this approval; the Applicant shall obtain permits and/or
clearances from the following public agencies:
o City Fire Marshal
o City of La Quinta Public Works Department
o Planning and Development Department
o Coachella Valley Water District
o Desert Sands Unified School District
o Imperial Irrigation District
Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be
presented to the Building and Safety Department at the time of application for any permit
for any use contemplated by this approval.
32. That shrub planting be placed on the south side of the five foot high screen wall by the
applicant and/or master developer.
33. That the wall logo signs be provided with a red background as noted on the revised plans
submitted to the Design Review Board on May 5, 1993.
34.** 'MeD,.....lds" sign eft ..eh side of the building _shall be «.a..e..A i Sift ... ,1... ....-.
smeller standafd sign (60% of the size shown on the submitted plans).
35. A minimum of three canopy trees shall be planted in the area around the play structure
to minimize the view of the portion above the fence from Highway 111.
36.** Oft the tewef oft the fteM side of the building, or left side tewef, the tile on the feff sid
shall be remeved.
37. The five foot high screen wall on the south side of the drive-thru lane shall be
constructed of slump block with a slurry finish and painted.
38. On the clearance height pole, the background for the lettering may be red.
39.., The playland structure shall be provided in an enclosed structure which is to be
architecturally compatible to the main restaurant, if the applicant can obtain approval
through the CC & R's to provide the additional enclosed area. If approval from the CC
& R's cannot be obtained, the playland structure may be provided outdoors. The
playland structure may be the original colors submitted by the applicant.
40.* Bicycle racks shall be provided for the restaurant. The exact location of the bicycle
racks are to be reviewed by the Department of Planning and Development. CONAPRVL.085 4 ' s OR
October 23, 1993
Stan Sawa, City Planner
City of La Quinta
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
Subject: McDonald's Restaurant
Request to Delete Screen Wall
Dear Stan,
'�''�
r' rye
!
u U�
OCT 26
1993
CITY 11 i f
L li(.f4
As we discussed, McDonald's would like to request that the screen wall be deleted from our "Conditions of Approval."
We understand that this will have to be considered by the DRB, Planning Commission and the City Council.
McDonald's would like to suggest that the screen wall not be required for the following reasons:
1. No Longer Functional - The original intent of the wall was to screen the view of the outdoor playland from the
street. We now have an indoor playland.
2. Too Costly - This wall would cost between $ 8,000 and $ 10,000. This money would be better spent on
upgrading the dining room and playland facilities to allow more enjoyment for the public.
3. Graffiti Problem - We believe that this wall would become a target for graffiti. It would be the longest expanse
of wall along the entire shopping center. It is very likely that this would become ongoing problem and nuisance.
4. Stand Out Like A Sore Thumb - Since Carl's Jr. and Taco Bell were not required to install a screen wall we
feel that our project will stand out and not appear in keeping with the other projects along the street.
McDonald's would like to propose a landscape screen wall in lieu of the concrete block wall. Our landscape architect has
recommended shrubs be used along the street on top of the existing berm. We believe that this in keeping with the rest of
the shopping center and would provide an excellent alternative.
I have requested that my consultants send you the fifteen (15) sets of the site plan, elevation and the landscape plan for
the DRB submittal and I will be happy you to send any additional sets, if needed.
We look forward to being heard at the November 3rd DRB meeting since our project is well underway and we wish to
avoid any delays.
Thanks in advance for your consideration and cooperation.
Sincerely,
Ro±r0enki9na4w-b
Construction Project Manager
pc: Ron Gilbreath, Owner/ Operator
George Tadros, Supervisor
Michelle hooch, Operations Consultant
David Pike, Dolan Construction
Skip Stirling, Construction Manager
McDonald's Corporation 4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92122 ,y. �191535-8
ri
is
ram]
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1993
CASE NO.: PLOT PLAN 93-512
APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT (CHUCK STROTHER)
ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT: ROBERT LAMB HART
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPING PLANS, GATED
ENTRANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOR 48TH
AVENUE.
LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF 48TH AVENUE EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property which was previously known as "The Pyramids" was granted specific plan
approval in November, 1994. To date, a Washington Street entry design and preliminary
landscaping design has been approved along with architectural plans for the first residential
units.
To date, one 18-hole golf course has been installed. This golf course is presently being
renovated so that it may be opened this season. A temporary clubhouse structure is under
construction on the site at this time.
The applicant has submitted conceptual landscaping plans for the 48th Avenue frontage and
preliminary architectural plans for the project entrance of which aligns with Adams Street and
administration building adjacent to the entry.
Street improvements including center medians are installed between Washington Street and
Adams Street. The curb on the south side of Adams and improvements east of Adams have yet
to be installed. The applicant is presently grading the extension of 48th Avenue.
LANDSCAPE DESIGN:
The proposed 48th Avenue landscape design places a heavy emphasis upon the use of trees. A
perimeter fence which is at this time proposed to be a vine covered chain link fence would be
provided at the 20-foot setback line in order to comply with the common area landscape setback
requirements. A six foot wide meandering sidewalk is shown adjacent to 48th Avenue. The
center median landscaping is proposed as a part of this project.
DRBST.107 1
,J'.0 J 01 C
The primary tree adjacent to the perimeter fence will be Eucalyptus Torquata with the accent
tree within this area consisting of California Peppers and Date Palms. As ground covers,
drought tolerant, spreading plants are proposed. Between the meandering sidewalk and curb,
drought tolerant shrubs and ground covers, along with Palo Verde and Mesquites spread out
along the frontage are proposed. The applicant has also shown a landscape design for the center
median which consists of Eucalyptus, Mesquite, Palo Verde, and drought tolerant shrubs and
ground cover. The landscape design which has been provided, extends from Washington Street
to approximately Dune Palms Road. The design for the area between Dune Palms Road and
Jefferson Street will be submitted in the future.
The entry area which aligns with Adams Street will consist .of a card gated entry and
administration building which in the future will function as a homeowners' association building.
The landscape design at the entry will consist of Date Palm plantings, special paving design,
stucco courtyard walls and ornamental iron security gates to match the main entrance on
Washington Street, and a low stucco wall monument and entry sign. Under planting around the
Date Palms will consist of either Brazalian Pepper or Citrus with a flowery Eucalyptus
background tree. The parking lot for the administration building will be adjacent to 48th Avenue
and screened by a combination of berming and shrub planting. Surrounding the administration
building will be either Ficus Nitadas or similar type of trees.
Immediately to the west of the 48th Avenue entrance is an existing CVWD well site. This well
site will be screened through the use of six foot stucco wall and the perimeter landscape
planting.
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING:
The administration building is proposed to be a 3,500 square foot single story structure. The
structure will be approximately 17.5 feet tall and be Spanish in nature to conform with the
architectural nature of the project. Exterior materials will consist of a two tone colored stucco
walls, multi -colored tile roof, stucco pop -outs around windows, and teal colored window and
door accents. Along the west side of the building on the windows will be decorative metal
grills.
ANALYSIS:
The Conditions of Approval require a noise study along 48th Avenue. This noise study may
require a masonry block wall along the frontage. Therefore, it should be noted that the chain
link fence may need to be replaced with a masonry wall.
The City has median guidelines for planting. It appears that the planting shown does not
conform with the guidelines for this street. Therefore, the landscaping may need to be revised
to conform with the guidelines. A copy of the guidelines for this street are attached.
Overall, the landscaping except as noted above, and administration building proposed are
acceptable to staff.
DRBST.107 2
01-1
Y
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS:
1. The median landscaping shall be revised to conform with the City guidelines for median
landscaping design.
2. That the specific plan required noise study shall be completed to determine whether a
block wall or a chain link fence may be permitted. The noise study shall be completed
prior to landscaping being installed in case additional berming is necessary.
3. That drip or emitter irrigation shall be utilized to the greatest extent.
4. That all ground areas shall be covered with ground cover or other decorative inert
materials.
5. That the meandering sidewalk be a minimum 4 feet from the 48th Avenue curb.
6. That the entry sign at Adams Street shall be allowed to be the same as that approved for
the main Washington Street entry.
7. That final landscaping and architectural plans including irrigation systems, materials and
colors, pavement patterns, wall heights, etc. shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning and Development Department prior to issuance of permits or beginning of
work.
8. That the administration parking lot area shall be screened through the use of berming and
planting so that the minimum amount of screening from the parking lot pavement
elevation shall be 3.5 feet.
Attachments:
1. Plan exhibits
2. Excerpt from City Landscape Guidelines
DRBST.107
tEl
0
1 C'
c •� � � G c E a 3 m� �° � .ro � aci
�t cc 0 t O '�. •p O .0 O C
vi > O w0 V F
o°
o y b4R� o ro'� U D� 3 wU co
y G L cd O y y1 G b0 V G> V y iC
f0 h V> G. Mo.= C O to
O
C y G ccCj G G ro0.) w .E O E .''. O O .N. y
Q VJ y ro c y N cc o w on C O 4 G
c0 CL O C ,G U L N b^ G p U wIn(:,
CIn 0.C. y y E>to
G
d O N OJ O N cc N 00 O N N �" .D C O b0
,h > MID N V� cd E •G O b O L Cl. L CO L y
y U O .E .0 0 Y r— y L ctl r— 6� C u ." cyo
CL 4 ctl a CR7 y C O '� v0i CIn
C ro .� U L Y y G E
> y In
y y Q' `� to
,Op C w0 ��., G V cC
C.- > cJ N Cl. —• ' : bU C 'U C > G
a o y 71 E o c E o L 0 '� y �'
C 7 C cIn C rn 7 N 2 O y C A oA y 'O C y' C R7 y C
y ii V cz
V V V Q. y N V�i V E
•y =In
A 1 CSo c Q u I", cc o>n. U
N
.n
z
'_1S N_-OS � 3
Al- -
� I
---- -- �.
B I '(1a SKWd I3Nno `
sw a'e
/'L5 NOlONI SV
a `
I \ 'i10 N3MOHN3SI3
L.--•--•--•--•--•--
Ki
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1993
CASE NO.: PLOT PLAN 93-511
APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT (CHUCK STROTHER)
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR MAINTENANCE BUILDING
FOR RANCHO LA QUINTA PROJECT
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF 50TH AVENUE IMMEDIATELY EAST OF
PARK STREET WITHIN RANCHO LA QUINTA.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property which was previously known as "The Pyramids" was granted specific plan
approval in November, 1984. To date, approval has been granted for the Washington Street
frontage and entry and architectural plans for the initial residential units.
The site in the past was a citrus grove. Many of the trees have died and were recently removed
in anticipation of this proposed construction. A few of the trees are proposed to be retained in
place. A portion of the golf course exists to the east, with the YMCA Childcare Center, and
soon to be constructed, Boys and Girls Club to the west. To the south is a custom home tract.
PROJECT PROPOSAL:
The subject property is somewhat of a parallelogram shaped site adjacent to the westerly
boundary of the project which runs parallel to Park Avenue. Park Avenue provides access to
La Quinta Middle School and Adams and Truman School. The site is approximately 170 feet
wide and 440 feet long. A 60' X 150' metal Palmer building is proposed as the main
maintenance structure on the site. Additionally, there will be a 40' X 60' pellet fertilizer
building, material bins, gas pumps, a wash down area and off-street parking. The maintenance
building is provided approximately 45 feet from the westerly property line.
Vehicular access is provided through a driveway near the northeasterly corner of the site into
the project and through a driveway onto 50th Avenue. The 50th Avenue access will be a right
turn in and out only due to the existing center median.
As previously noted, the maintenance building as well as the pellet fertilizer building will be
metal Palmer buildings. The maintenance building which would contain a garage shop area,
office areas, and restrooms, would be a maximum of approximately 17 feet high at the peak of
the gable roof. On top of the roof at the highest point there would be six 9" X 10' roof ridge
DRBST.105 1
02�
vents. The exterior walls would be medium tan in color with roofing light tin. the material
would be Butlerib 11 wall sheeting. The only other material on the building would be two small
canvas awnings over the pedestrian doorways facing west.
The pellet fertilizer building would also be the same material and construction with the
maximum height being 14 feet. The front of the building facing the paved parking area would
be open.
The applicant has submitted a preliminary landscaping plan for the project. The plans indicate
that heavy screening through the use of trees is proposed around all sides of the property to
screen it from view. Citrus trees are proposed as the primary trees along 50th Avenue and
along the interior street to the east. Around the Park Avenue and northern end the trees consist
of Pines, Bottle trees and Australian Willows.
Along Park Avenue, 50th Avenue, and the interior street, a six foot high block wall is proposed.
Along the northerly end the material bins which would consist of a masonry wall and the
fertilized building would enclose the area. On the northern end of the fertilizer building, the
plans indicate that the streetscape landscaping will be provided further screening. There will be
a small amount of landscaping provided along the southern and eastern end of the maintenance
building.
ANALYSIS:
The action of the Design Review Board will be a recommendation to the Planning Commission
and City Council. The location and circulation system of the project will be reviewed by the
Planning Commission.
The applicant has proposed a standard metal building due to the nature of the use. The applicant
feels that the structure is acceptable provided it can be completely screened from all sides.
Along Park Avenue, the maintenance building is approximately 60 feet to 95 feet away from
Park Avenue. This distance varies due to the meandering nature of Park Avenue. The
maintenance building is approximately 145 feet away from 50th Avenue. The fertilizer building
is approximately 60 feet away from Park Avenue. Between Park Avenue and the applicant's
property line, there is a strip of land owned by the City. This land was planted with citrus trees
which have since died and will need to be relandscaped. The landscaping for this area has not
yet been determined.
Staff would offer the following comments regarding this project:
1. If metal buildings are permitted on the property, it must be assured that they will be
screened from view of the public streets. This screening should occur within one year
of planting of the landscaping materials.
2. The landscaping along 50th Avenue has not yet been submitted or prepared. This
landscaping will somewhat set the tone and should be similar to that utilized along the
street.
DRBST.105 2
3. Should it be determined that the building should be further away from Park Avenue, it
would be possible to provide the parking on the westerly side of the building and move
the building eastward. This should provide some additional screening of the building due
to moving it further from Park Avenue.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS:
1. That trees be planted around the entire site so that their ultimate sizes overlap and full
screening of the maintenance area is provided. All trees shall be a minimum of 36" box
size and be trees which will provide a significant amount of screening within one to two
years.
2. That the landscaping along 50th Avenue shall be similar and compatible with the
landscaping along the balance of 50th Avenue. The landscaping for this project shall be
modified to be compatible if necessary at a future date.
Attachments:
1. Plan exhibits
DRBST.105
3
t P 0
BI #5
STAFF REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1993
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PHASE VII OF THE
LA QUINTA HIGHLANDS TRACT 23269 - LA QUINTA DEL REY
APPLICANT: MR. JIM R. CROWELL, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT - CENTURY
CROWELL COMMUNITIES (A.K.A. CENTURY HOMES)
LOCATION: CUSTOM LOTS (LOTS 70-72, 166-173, 175, 177-181, 185 & 234-244).
GENERAL
LOCATION: SANITA DRIVE, VILLETA DRIVE, LA PALMA DRIVE, AND
ESTELO COURT
ARCHITECT: BENJAMIN AGUILAR AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ZONING: R-1 (ONE FAMILY DWELLING)
BACKGROUND:
Tract Information
The La Quinta Highlands tract was subdivided in 1988 by Triad Development Company. The
subdivision includes approximately 255 lots on +72 acres. The map was recorded in 1989 and
since that time various builders have constructed homes within the subdivision. Those
developers included:
1. La Ouinta Hi hg lands built +45 homes at the northerly (central) portion of the tract with
units which ranged in size from 1,220 square feet (3 bedroom + 2 bath) to 1,840 square
feet (4 bedroom + 21/2 bath).
2. La Ouinta Vistas built : 46 homes at the northwest side of the tract with units which
ranged in size from 1,609 to ±2,300 square feet.
3. Williams Development Company built +22 homes at the northeast side of the tract with
units which ranged in size from 1,470 (3 bedroom + 2 bath) to 1,818 square feet (4
bedroom + 3 bath).
DRBST.103
1
Century Homes has recently received Design Review Board and Planning Commission
approval to complete 22 single family homes in this area with their Plan 3, 4, and 5
units. The bonus room addition was added to many of the units and the applicant's
house plans ranged in size from 1,606 square feet to 2,010 square feet (Phase VI).
4. Century Homes built +76 homes at the southeasterly side of the tract with units which
ranged in size from 1,006 square feet (2 bedroom + 1 bath) to 1,678 square feet (3
bedroom + 3 bath).
5. Individual Custom Lots consist of +33 lots at the southwesterly side of the tract.
Currently a majority of the area is vacant; however, there are a few one story single
family homes which are 1,688 square feet or ±2,300 square feet.
Century Homes Back rg ound
Century Homes purchased 76 lots in 1991 and received Planning Commission approval on
October 8, 1991, for four unit types to be built within Phases I, III, and V (Lots 79-94, 96-148,
245-251). The Plans 1-4 ranged in size from 1,006 square feet to 1,567 square feet. A larger
fifth unit for Phase V, Plan 5 (1,678 square feet) was approved by the Planning Commission on
January 12, 1993. Since their approval, they have built all 76 homes and have sold 72 of the
homes. Their existing models are on Las Vistas Drive and Sanita Drive and their existing
homes are on La Palma Drive and Sanita Drive to the west of the Palm Royale Park (±5 acres)
at Arosa Way and La Palma Drive.
Their Phase VI project (22 homes) will begin construction in the next few weeks. Phase -VI is
located at the northeast side of the existing tract on Sanesta Way and Villeta Drive. The
Planning Commission approved Phase VI on October 26, 1993.
New Request
Century Homes has purchased most of the remaining vacant lots in the custom lot area and three
lots across the street from the existing Palm Royale Park which were not built on in the early
1990's. Century Homes has purchased these remaining 29 lots (Phase VII) with the intention
of building their product line that they had previous approval to build in Phases I, III, V and VI.
A copy of their building schedule is attached. The tract will be generally completed once these
remaining lots are developed and Phase VI is finished. Their minimum house size for this phase
is 1,606 square feet with the largest house being 2,010 square feet. The developer is planning
to use his three largest plans for Phase VII with each unit including a two car garage. Three
car garage are proposed for Lots 167 and 241. The reason the house sizes are larger than the
base house size square footage is that the bonus room combination will be used on a large
percentage of the proposed homes. The "X" on the building schedule means a finished bonus
room is being added to the base house size.
DRBST.103
2
02�
Architecture
A Spanish/contemporary architectural style is proposed which is similar to the abutting character
of the neighborhood. The color scheme will have seven different combinations using two
different the colors, red/brown with a spatter of grey and brown with a spatter of golden yellow.
Five different alternate colors (brown, beige, and off-white) are being proposed for facia and
garage doors. Seven alternate stucco colors are also being proposed (all desert shades). Seven
accent colors including muted greens, blues, and browns are also proposed.
The Phase VII homes are all one story except for the Plan 4 design which is a two story plan.
Lots 168, 172, 175, 236, and 237 have two story units planned.
Previous Design Review Board Action (Phase VI)
On October 6, 1993, the Century Homes' application request was considered by the Design
Review Board. Mr. Pavelak, representing Century Homes, explained the predicament they were
in concerning their building plan check and the fact that they could not be issued a building
permit until the Planning Commission recertified their plans for their new phase. He also
explained their past marketing program. He explained that his company was aware of the
Forecast (Quinterra tract) application and he said his company was not proposing homes which
are not compatible with the existing one and two story homes around Phase VI. He stated that
their homes have been selling well here in La Quinta and Indio and that some of the larger
builders in La Quinta have gone out of business trying to build homes larger than 2,000 square
feet (e.g., Windsor, Topaz, Williams Development Company, Lake La Quinta, etc.). He
reiterated that they are ready to begin constriction as soon as they can receive approval by the
City. He said that over 90% of their buyers in Phase VI want their bonus room option which
adds +165 square feet to 273 square feet to their base square footage by converting the third
car garage space into livable square footage.
The Design Review Board recommended approval of the project because the units are compatible
with the abutting single family homes. The Board conditioned the project to have 18 inch roof
eaves and that the developer meet the State's Title 24 Energy requirements (S.E.E.R. value of
10.0 or better) for air conditioning condensers. The Planning Commission approved the project
on October 26, 1993. The applicant acquired his building permits on October 27, 1993.
Tract Issues
In September, 1993, staff received a petition from the La Quinta Vista residents during the
Forecast Homes application stating that they desired to be notified when a future builder was
planning to build in this area. Staff will notify the residents of the future Planning Commission
meeting.
DRBST.103
The existing homes within the immediate area were developed by various builders. The homes
range in size from 1,609 square feet to ±2,300 square feet which is similar to the submittal of
Century Homes. The only exception is the existing homes have three car garages, metal garage
doors, and masonry walls. The Century Homes will primarily have two car garages because the
third garage space will be converted to a bonus room which increases the square footage of each
home to be consistent with the abutting homes.
The existing tract conditions require all homes to be a minimum livable area of 1,000 square feet
and all two story homes shall not exceed 24 feet in overall height. The attached plans meet
these minimum requirements. The applicant's plans meet the R-1 Zoning requirements.
CONCLiJSION:
The Century plans are compatible and consistent with the existing homes surrounding Phase VII
provided the attached conditions labeled Exhibit "A" are imposed.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Design Review Board recommend approval to the Planning Commission of the
architectural plans for Century Homes in Phase VII of Tract 23269 (La Quinta Highlands)
subject to the attached conditions.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Phase VII Map
3. House Size Survey
4. Developer Map (TT 23269)
5. Draft conditions
6. Large plans (Design Review Board only)
DRBST.103
4
02(
PROJECT
I-
SITE
tn
FRED
DRIVE
W
TRACT
123288
o
MILES
<
AVENUE
TAC.
i
J
a WESTWARD
HO
I11
s
VICINITY MAP
N. T. S.
:.r 02 7
r
n
W
s
_ _ v� f �s' r'FiJ C 95:vzFi) _. � f OZE{ w�--- - _ �� �� E•
.41
to
n
b I a
1p 3 o
N \
r .0 `I ot
a N h %
r
rA
N d 7d iVXYJ 4
r^ o
O Q Ilk N
ti: G
++ n M1 V N >
♦ Q1 p S��n x c E o
Oo
Is c•�>a
n G x w E
N N h h V O O N O• r a� U m e
m 0 o x
OW N
r rE0 i
OG o v ti h a h 1 ti 4l N N
lV � N o°� `� qa, h � � -- - o b � x �o •� a
n
JUw �3u
1V` . yYY
i
v m
O\ X'
W (, d 9 986/J
N N D'6
9 NA �F6 IN
/si d h
�a NO I�
'O/V020
a ��m
, ` r J
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - PROPOSED
CENTURY HOMES (PHASE VII)
NOVEMBER 3, 1993
1 . The front yard of all lots, and in addition, the street side yard of corner lots,
shall be landscaped to property line, edge of curb, sidewalk, or edge of street
pavement, whichever is furthest from the residence.
2. The landscaping for each lot shall include one 24" box tree and one 15-gallon
tree on interior lots and one (24" box) tree and four (15 gallon) trees on
corner lots, minimum five gallon shrubs, and groundcover and/or hardscape
of sufficient size, spacing and variety to create an attractive and unifying
appearance. Landscaping shall be in substantial compliance with the
standards set forth in the Manual on Architectural Standards and the Manual
on Landscaping Standards as adopted by the Planning Commission.
3. A permanent water -efficient irrigation system shall be provided for all areas
required to be landscaped. The provisions of Ordinance #220 shall be met.
The final landscape plan should be reviewed by the City, the Coachella Valley
Water District, and the Riverside County Agricultural Commission.
4. The landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and viable
condition by the property owner.
5. The standards of the R-1 Zoning shall be met (e.g. setbacks, fencing, etc.) .
6. The concrete roof tile in Phase VII shall be similar in color and style to the
abutting homes.
7. The minimum roof eave should be 18-inches.
8. Sectional metal roll -up garage doors should be installed on all garages.
9. The minimum dwelling unit size within Phase VII should be 1,606 square feet
excluding the two car garage.
10. The developer shall meet the minimum Title 24 State requirements for energy
efficiency during plan check (e.g. 10 SEER or larger for the condensing
unit) .
11. All requirements of Tract Map 23269 shall be met during plan check.
12. The applicant should provide masonry block walls for all new homes prior to
occupancy of each dwelling unit. Metal or wood gates shall be provided.
13. No two story homes should be built next door to any existing one story home.
CONAPRVL.007
03r,
i
v
c
N O m
Y •r i
N
c•rY ro
a)
o�rov)
a
0
a a) a)
_
CT.
L
a) O_ O L
r)
61 ro
N
N 4- Y
O O
Y
0 r-
L c •r 41
L O
4- ro
V
a)
•C
L
EO
O
Vim)
O Y c
d al
Y ro ro
L
O L O •r
= .
c
v N
N al
(7i ro
•r O
O
1 O- L
O U
Y CT4- Y
>1
m
p
N d
N t 4
lQ 1
ro c O
L .,
N
L c
i
_
Y S-
E _
O d
i
a)
O N ro N ro
c
x
w
=
ro
r >
4- •r = m a)
al
=
J
N
Y+�9
ro
c X CT O L
U
ro
>Q)
>
C
<C L
r-� QI in ro
y
L E
O
Cn
o
x x o
Yx
wwm
a)
am
o
i NC7
UN
•K
Z
N
m 'Y
JIAMIO —
N
Cif 6O
.-a
Y
L
r
ro
Y
c
Y
J
c
m
•r
E
O
Y
pr
Y
U
N
t6
J
U
�
034
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
MEMORANDUM
HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
NOVEMBER 3, 1993
PLANS SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEVELOPER
HANDOUTS
At the last meeting of October 6, 1993, staff submitted a draft copy of submittal requirements
for development applications. It was determined that the Design Review Board would review
this at their leisure and submit any comments to staff by October 20th. Staff received no
comments so we will proceed with finalizing the submittal requirements and inserting them into
the appropriate applications for use. '
With regards to the developer handouts, it was determined that staff would review them and
determine where the design review process should be inserted. Staff has taken the appropriate
handouts and noted where the design review process should be inserted. On a separate sheet,
staff has drafted language which would be inserted. These items are attached for your review.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend that the Design Review Board review the attached items prior to this
meeting for action at the November 2, 1993 meeting.
Attachments:
1. Copies of new draft language for insertion into application developer handouts.
MEMOSS.178 1
i.o
�3R
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD LANGUAGE
FOR
INSERTING INTO DEVELOPER HANDOUTS
STEP 4:
Design Review: If your project includes a construction of a structures and/or the
installation of landscaping, review by the Design Review Board (DRB) is
required. The Planning staff will review and analyze the architectural and
landscaping aspects of the project and prepare a report for the DRB. The
DRB will review your request at their meeting which is held on the first
Wednesday of each month. Their action will be a recommendation to the
Planning Commission and City Council.
MEMOSS.1.78
n_ n
3,3
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CITY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
October 6, 1993
I. CALL TO ORDER
5:30 P.M.
A. Chairman Curtis brought the meeting to order at 5:31 P.M. and Boardmember
Rice led the flag salute.
II. ROLL CALL
A. Present: Boardmembers Fred Rice, David Harbison, Randall Wright, James
Campbell, Planning Commissioner Barrows, and Chairman Curtis.
Boardmembers Harbison/Campbell moved to excuse Boardmember Anderson.
Unanimously approved.
B. Staff present: Planning Director Jerry Herman, Principal Planner Stan Sawa,
Associate Planners Greg Trousdell and Leslie Mouriquand-Cherry, and
Department Secretary Betty Sawyer.
Staff stated that Century Homes was present and requested to be added to the agenda for review
of their architectural plans for Phase VI of the La Quinta Highlands tract. These units were
approved for Phases I, III, and V in 1991 and 1992 (76 lots). Boardmember Rice asked if staff
had reviewed the plans and was prepared to give a report. Staff stated they had done so.
Planning Commissioner Barrows asked if Century Homes had information on the previously
approved units. Mr. John Pavelak stated they did. There being no further questions, Planning
Commissioner Barrows moved and Boardmember Campbell seconded a motion to place the item
fourth on the agenda. Unanimously approved.
III. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Conditional Use Permit 93-008 and Variance 93-023; a request of Augustin
Martinez (La Quinta Meat Market) for approval to remodel and enlarge an
existing 1,581 square foot one story commercial building and a request to vary
from the C-V-N zoning district standards (street sideyard setback) and modify the
City's Off -Street Parking requirements for a building located on the northeast
corner of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas.
DRB10-6
1
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
DRB10-6
1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in
the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and
Development Department.
2. Planning Commissioner Barrows asked staff if the wall at the back end of
the property would be a block wall. Staff stated they would retain the
existing landscaping but a new block wall was proposed along the east
property line. Planning Commissioner Barrows stated her concern for
safety at the rear of the property and whether the building lighting would
be enough. Staff went on to explain the lighting proposed for the project.
3. Boardmember Rice asked what the height of the common property line
wall would be. Staff stated it was proposed to be four feet.
4. Boardmember Campbell asked if the City had any standards for trees.
Staff stated that the City has not adopted a street tree ordinance but the
draft material is used as a guideline for tree type. It was mentioned that
the adopted specific plan has a street tree program.
5. Boardmember Campbell questioned the treatment of the metal window
frames. Staff stated that the Village Specific Plan allowed the applicant
to either go with wood or anodized metal provided it was painted.
6. Boardmember Campbell asked if the concrete sidewalk on Avenida
Bermudas was required by the City. Staff stated they recommended
reducing the width but could eliminate the sidewalk and require
landscaping if the Design Review Board felt it was more appropriate.
7. Mr. Charles Garland, architect for the applicant stated he was in
agreement with the staff report and would answer any questions of the
Board.
8. Boardmember Wright asked if on the north elevation the tile roof eyebrow
could be extended across the rear of the structure. Boardmember Wright
also asked why the tower element on the east side was not the main
entrance as opposed to the southeast corner being the entry into the
building. Mr. Garland stated the entrance was based on what the owner
wanted due to the interior layout of the equipment and the corner entrance
was a compromise to keep the entrance away from the cabinet layout and
to keep close to Calle Tampico.
2
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
9. Chairman Curtis asked that if the entrance was to be on the southeast
corner of the building, could an entry statement be added to this area. He
stated the sign and column setup needed to be moved to the corner with
the door. Mr. Garland stated it would be easier to rearrange the interior
and try to put the entrance on the south side by putting more glass on the
front side. Chairman Curtis stated that the south elevation did need more
store -front glass to dress up the new business.
10. Boardmember Campbell stated his concern that the ramp for the handicap
would be blocked. Mr. Garland explained the handicap access.
Discussion followed.
11. Boardmember Harbison stated there was some confusion regarding the
Tampico frontage. It was uncertain as to whether it was the entry or
whether there needed to be a window display so it would not look like the
east side of the building. Mr. Garland stated he would address the issue
with the owner.
12. Chairman Curtis asked if some other architectural upgrades could be done
to the north elevation. Mr. Garland stated his concern that this is the
delivery side and any low building projections would interfere with truck
deliveries. Boardmember Harbison stated that due to the amount of traffic
passing through this area, something was needed to dress up the loading
dock. Boardmember Campbell suggested that possibly a small balcony
could solve the problem. Discussion followed regarding alternatives to
dress up the north side building elevations.
13. Planning Commissioner Barrows expressed her concern for lighting on the
north and west elevations as it was a place to congregate and security
would be a problem. Mr. Garland stated this was a concern of the owner
as well. This was why he was trying to separate his building from the
business to the east.
14. Planning Commissioner Barrows stated that if more windows were added
she wanted to be assured that she would not see the backs of display racks
from the exterior of the building. Mr. Garland stated he would address
the issue with the owner.
15. Boardmember Campbell asked if the block wall separating the two
businesses would be stuccoed. Mr. Garland stated it was one of the
conditions.
DRB10-6 3 y
1?3r
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
16. Boardmember Campbell stated the plans did not match the elevations.
Column pilasters on the west side that did not match the elevations as well
as the east side shows existing trees and the elevations show Cypress
trees. Mr. Garland explained the floor plan was submitted before the
elevations were drawn and the elevations show the proposed changes. He
further stated the extra columns would be eliminated.
17. Boardmember Campbell asked what the reason was for the walkway on
the east side. Mr. Garland stated the owner did not want a lot of
landscaping to maintain, therefore the walkway was provided. It also
made it easier for deliveries. Members stated that the additional walkway
would encourage debris and graffiti and landscaping would be preferred.
18. Boardmember Campbell recommended that the trash enclosure be moved
to the east property line. Mr. Garland stated this was already planned and
was a condition proposed by staff.
19. Boardmember Campbell asked if Mr. Garland had any problem using
painted metal window frames instead of the anodized metal. Mr. Garland
stated he had no objection.
20. Boardmember Campbell stated he was not comfortable with a relationship
of a 18" overhang with a half of a column that is 9" and is a half round
that turns into a rectangular piece right above on the same plane. Mr.
Garland stated he would rectify the problem.
21. Boardmembers Rice and Harbison stated they felt the improvements made
a great improvement on the building.
22. Planning and Development Director Jerry Herman asked if the Board
intended to require windows and a door on the Tampico elevation.
Chairman Curtis stated that they wanted the door to be an entry statement
and it could be on the east or the south elevation. Staff stated their
concern that if windows were added that a condition be added to restrict
the amount of window signage that could be allowed.
23. There being no further comments, it was moved by Boardmember
Campbell and seconded by Planning Commissioner Barrows to
recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit 93-008 and Variance 93-
023 subject to staff conditions as well as the following:
DRB10-6 4
03 f'
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
a. The plans are to be updated to match the elevations before being
submitted to the Planning Commission.
b. Additional architectural features need to be added to the north
elevation.
C. The walkway on the east side of the building be eliminated and
landscaping installed in its place.
d. The building entry be either centered on the building on the east
or south side of the building.
e. The trash enclosure be moved to the east property line.
f. That painted metal window frames be used instead of the anodized
aluminum.
g. The Cypress trees be replaced by canopy trees.
h. Window signing should be regulated per the La Quinta Municipal
Code.
The vote was unanimously approved.
B. Plot Plan 93-510; a request of La Quinta Real Estate Development for approval
of a new unit plan for Tract 23268-Acacia.
1. Associate Planner Leslie Mouriquand-Cherry presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning
and Development Department.
2. Chairman Curtis asked what the status of the uncolored lots was. Staff
stated these lots were owned by individual owners for custom homes.
3. Boardmember Wright commented on the square footage of the smallest
existing unit, of which 18 of the first 90 units were. The proposed
smallest unit were slightly smaller than these existing units. Staff stated
that in addition, the proposed largest unit is 169 square feet larger than the
existing largest unit. Discussion followed regarding the product mix.
Staff then showed a video of the area in question.
4. Planning Commissioner Barrows asked what the City required in the
number of trees to be planted. Staff stated that Condition #2 required two
15-gallon trees were required on the interior lots and five 15-gallon trees
on corner lots.
5. Chairman Curtis asked if anyone wished to speak on behalf of the
applicant. Mr. Rick Snyder, representing Acacia Homes, stated he was
agreement with the staff's recommendations and would answer any
questions of the Board.
DRB10-6 5 f 0
3 4
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
6. Chairman Curtis asked if they were the builders of the original tract. Mr.
Snyder stated they were.
7. Planning Commissioner Barrows asked if the garage doors were proposed
to be metal roll -up or wood. Mr. Snyder stated this had not been
determined as of yet but they would be the same as the existing garages.
8. Chairman Curtis asked how many homes were planned for Phase I. Mr.
Snyder stated that the first phase would consist of 20 homes and from
there on, it would be dependent upon financing and sales. Chairman
Curtis asked if the mix was also dependent upon sales. Mr. Snyder stated
they would be to a point. Chairman Curtis asked if there were any
limitations on the size of the units due to lot sizes. Mr. Snyder stated no.
9. Boardmember Rice asked if the price range would be comparable to the
existing units. Mr. Snyder stated they would be.
10. Boardmember Campbell asked the applicant to explain the window break-
up treatment. Mr. Arnold stated it was a dual pane window with a
sandwiched frame in between to meet the Title 24 requirements.
11. Boardmember Harbison question the use of 12" overhang and stated his
desire to see 18" overhangs. Mr. Snyder stated that both 12" and 18"
overhangs were being used.
12. There being no further questions, Boardmembers Harbison/Rice moved
and seconded a motion to recommend approval of Plot Plan 93-510 subject
to staff's conditions as well as the following:
a. That all units have 18" overhangs.
b. That the material of the garage doors match the existing homes in
the tract.
The motion was approved unanimously.
C. Palm Royale Park; a request of the Parks and Recreation Department for review
of park design located on the west side of Adams Street between Fred Waring
Drive and Miles Avenue.
1. Parks and Recreation Manager Clint Bohlen presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning
and Development Department.
DRB10-6
6 v
03,c�
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
2. Chairman Curtis asked for clarification of the grade elevation. Staff stated
it was 17-feet at its lowest point in the retention basin.
3. Boardmember Harbison questioned the fact that the people in this
neighborhood do not want an active park. Staff stated that in the forums
held, the overwhelming opinion was to have a passive park. They did not
want the area to become a hangout for kids.
4. Boardmember Harbison stated his concern about the street drains being an
eyesore. He felt dry wells were needed to dry the area out. Staff stated
the Master Plan acknowledged the problem and the issue would be
addressed before construction took place.
5. Chairman Curtis suggested that the area be regraded to bring the water to
a specific drainage area and this could possible solve the problem. Staff
stated this would be addressed in the construction drawing stage.
6. Mr. John Pavelak, Century Homes, stated his concern that the passive
park be built. He felt that even though the homeowners in the area
requested a passive park, that the area was ideal for a soccer field and
based on his experience in developing parks, the field would be used if it
was built. He felt the City should not let the fear of the "hang-out"
problem deny the families the opportunity to have a recreation area.
7. There being no further discussion, Boardmembers Rice/Campbell moved
and seconded a motion to recommend approval of the Palm Royale Park
as submitted with the addition of grading the park for drainage.
Unanimously approved.
D. Architectural Plan Approval for La Ouinta Highlands - Tract 23269; a request of
Century Homes for architectural approval to develop Plans 3 through 5 in Phase
VI of Tract 23269.
1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented a verbal staff report since the
item was added to the agenda.
2. Chairman Curtis questioned staff as to what the party fencing would
consisted of. Staff stated the front fencing would be decorative masonry
and the interior sideyards could be wood, but the street sides would be
masonry or stucco.
� F
DRB10-6 7
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
3. Mr. John Pavelak, representing Century Homes presented their proposal.
He stated that they built 76 homes in this tract over the last few years in
Phases I, III, and V and they have recently purchased 22 lots in Phase VI.
Williams Development Company was originally going to build 44 homes
but they did not complete their phase. Mr. Pavelak stated he is building
homes which are similar in size to the surrounding existing homes.
4. Chairman Curtis asked if the applicant would be constructed models. Mr.
Pavelak stated the models were already existing on Las Vistas Drive.
5. Boardmember Wright asked if the bonus room was added to the plan.
Mr. Pavelak stated that 97% of the previous home buyers requested the
room so they added it to the plan.
6. Boardmember Wright asked what the average lot size was and the price
range for the homes. Mr. Pavelak stated roughly 7,200 square feet and
the price range was $125-150,000.
7. Boardmember Rice stated his concern that again there were no 18" roof
overhangs.
8. Boardmember Wright asked what the S.E.E.R. rating was for the air
conditioning condensers. Mr. Pavelak stated he didn't know but they met
the State Title 24 requirements.
9. There being no further questions, Boardmembers Wright/Rice moved to
recommend reapproval of the architectural plans for Phase VI of Tract
23269, subject to staff conditions and the requirement that overhangs be
18" and that the air conditioning condenser have a minimum S.E.E.R.
rating of 10.0 or better. Unanimously approved.
E. Application Submittal Requirement Review
1. Chairman Curtis clarified for the Board their responsibility. The Board
was to review the document and attachments and make any revisions as
they felt they related to the Design Review Board.
2. Boardmember Wright clarified that the Board will make these revisions
within two weeks and resubmit these documents to staff who would
compile the information and return it to the Board for final approval.
Members discussed with staff the Board's role in the Planning process.
•3 r,
DRB10-6 $
4t
Design Review Board Minutes
October 6, 1993
3. Boardmember Campbell asked if staff was satisfied with the current
handout. Staff stated these were the documents currently being used and
if the Board had any suggestions they would be welcome. Staff indicated
they would insert the Design Review Board process where appropriate.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
Chairman Curtis asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of September 1,
1993. There being no additions or corrections, Boardmembers Curtis/Campbell moved
and seconded a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved and seconded by Boardmembers Harbison/Campbell to adjourn to a regular
meeting of the Design Review Board on November 3, 1993, at 5:30 P.M. This meeting of the
La Quinta Design Review Board was adjourned at 7:42 P.M., October 6, 1993.
r.r
DRB10-6 9
Ir
of