2000 01 05 ALRCpa�tuvc7`q„c
a�w
OF
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the
La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
January 5, 2000
10:00 A.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2000-001
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing.
Please complete a 'Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes.
III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of the December 8, 1999 Minutes.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Case ........................
Applicant ..................
Location ...................
Request ....................
Action ......................
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 99-664
Tiburon Homes, LLC
To be constructed in the Norman Golf Course, on the north
side of Airport Boulevard, east of Madison Street.
Approval of architectural plans for three new prototype
residential units.
Minute Motion 2000-
ALRC/AGENDA
0__ : 001
B. Case ........................
Applicant ..................
Location ...................
Request ....................
Action .....................
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 99-665
Steven Walker Homes
To be constructed in the Norman Golf Course, on the north
side of Airport Boulevard, east of Madison Street.
Approval of architectural plans for three new prototype
residential units.
Minute Motion 2000-
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VIL COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
ALRC/AGENDA +-"_ � 002
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
December 8, 1999
L CALL TO ORDER
10:00 a.m.
A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order
at 10:08 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di Iorio.
B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham, and Frank
Reynolds.
C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa,
Associate Planner Leslie Mouriquand, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio asked if there were any changes to the Minutes
of October 7, 1999. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve the minutes as submitted.
Unanimously approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Site Development Permit 99-657; a request of RHL Design Group for USA
Petroleum for approval of architectural and landscaping plans for a gasoline facility
with mini market and automated tunnel car wash located at the northwest corner fo
Highway 11 I and Dune Palms Road.
I. Associate Planner Leslie Mouriquand presented the information contained in
the staff report and noted revised elevations were submitted prior to the
meeting, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he did not see where the palm trees were
listed on the plant list. Staff noted they were listed under groundcover.
CAMyDocuments\WPDOCS\AI.RC12-8-99.wpd
J
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee
December 8, 1999
3. Committee Member Cunningham stated the additional rear detail was an
improvement with the windows and other design details. With regard to the
towers he did not believe it was a problem. Planning Manager Christine di
Iorio stated that design wise the entry tower architecturally should
predominate. The second tower is decorative and does not define any entry
or exit while the last defines the exit to the car wash. Because the building
is only 14-feet high and the towers other than the entry tower, will be up to
nine feet taller than the building, this will appear to be out of portion and
unbalanced. They should be integrated into the whole design and not appear
as if they are standing by themselves. Staff agrees with the new design as it
integrates the two towers into the existing roof and leaves the entry tower as
is which is fine because it is the focal of the design. Committee Member
Cunningham started he liked the towers because a lot of the buildings along
Highway 111 have the long plane loon and this breaks up that linear look.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he likes the applicant's original design
and believes it is an attractive building, but he understands staff s issue.
5. Mr. Jim Shively, Project Manager for USA Petroleum, stated they added
detail to the rear elevation and although the towers are lowered it spreads the
design out. Their challenge has been to give as much variation as possible
under the City's ordinances. They believe the building should stretch and
grow as much as possible. He understands staff s desire for a lower profile,
but if you drop the towers down, it looks squatty. The tower adds interest.
A compromise would be to retain one tower, the large tower, and lower the
other for a lower profile. They are willing to do either suggestion. It is not
their intention to violate the height regulations.
6. Committee Member Bobbin stated the pad elevation at the corner sits up
fairly high and asked staff what the final grade would be. Planning Manager
Christine di Iorio stated it is six feet higher than the street and this will be an
issue before the Planning Commission. Staff is recommending a drop in the
pad height. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that with the height of the pad
the building towers would be up too high.
7. Committee Member Reynolds stated the access off of Highway I I I is a
concern to him. Staff stated it is a right in/right out and has been approved
as part of the Specific Plan.
8. Committee Member Cunningham stated he liked the look of the towers, but
if the building is to be constructed at the pad's current height, they will be too
high. Staff stated a recommendation will made to the Planning Commission
to require the pad height to be reduced. The Zoning Code for the Highway
I I I Corridor allows 22 feet within 150 feet of the right of way. Committee
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC12-8-99.wpd 2
OOj
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee
December 8, 1999
prefer to see all three towers as it would add a little spice to the corner. The
detail that has been added to the rear has resolved any issues with that
elevation.
Committee Member Bobbit stated it depends on the final pad height. If the
pad comes down, the towers can stay as proposed by the applicant. If the pad
is going to remain at four feet above Highway 111, then the towers should be
lowered.
10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee
Members Cunningham/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion 99-022
recommending approval of Site Development Permit 98-657, subject to
conditions as recommended with the deletion of Condition # 1. Unanimously
approved.
B. Site Development Permit 99-661; a request of Canaday & Company for approval of
architectural and landscaping plans for three new prototype residential units located
on the north side of 48" Avenue, east of Caleo Bay Drive within Lake La Quinta.
Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff
report, •a copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
Mr. Roger Moore, representing the applicant, stated they had no objection to
the conditions as recommended with the except of Condition 91. The new
homes have a ten foot plate compared to the existing off -water plans which
have an eight foot plate. In his opinion, it will look out of proportion with the
existing. He believes the clipped gable -end is outdated. With the new roof
line they pick up the feeling of the clipped gable roof. They can add a gable -
end over the master bedroom at the rear to change the look, and/or a gable to
the front to make it different on the front on the Plan 20 and 10. They do
however, strongly object to the clipped gable. They are trying to create
interior volume.
Committee Member Bobbitt asked if staff s recommendation could be
accomplished without the clipped gable.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated the reason to use the clipped gable
is that it was less costly. In the one plan there is a hip along the back. On the
second .plan it takes care of itself. On the third plan the applicant's
suggestion for the rear would solve units having the same problem. He then
asked the applicant how close they are from the other houses with the clipped
roof. Mr. Moore stated they are across the street from some. None of the
water units have clipped gable roofs. The Avante units have a mix of both.
The only conflict would be the units across the street. There are a total of 56
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC12-8-99.wpd 3 - 00.
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee
December 8, 1999
lots left for development of these plans. The first three lots off Adams Street
would be the models.
5. Committee Member Cunningham received clarification that 56 lots would be
built with the proposed three plans.
6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what staff would do with the proposed
roof type to achieve the clipped gable roof look. Staff showed examples.
Committee Member Cunningham stated he did not see a problem in the
development. Some of the units will have clipped gables and some will have
the shape developed by the original developer as well as the other developers.
He approves of the hipped roofs. He does agree that on the rear roof of the
house it should be more articulated.
Committee Member Bobbitt stated that without something to look at it is hard
to visualize the difference between the two. Discussion followed as to what
the units would look like.
9. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it would be a lot of work to change the
plans. Staff stated Condition 41 could be deleted.
10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee
Members Cunningham/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion 99-023 approving
Site Development Permit 99-661, as recommended with the deletion of
Condition #1. Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
V. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None
VI. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review
Committee to the next regular meeting to be held on January 5, 2000. This meeting was adjourned
at 10:53 a.m. on December 8, 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
C:AMy Documents\WPDOCSVALRC 12-8-99.wpd 4 . '_ _. 006
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO.
APPLICANT:
ARCHITECTS:
REQUEST:
JANUARY 5, 2000
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 99-665
STEVEN WALKER HOMES
BASSENIAN LAGONI
APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR THREE NEW
PROTOTYPE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
LOCATION: TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE NORMAN GOLF COURSE, ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD, EAST OF
MADISON STREET
BACKGROUND:
The property is located in the Norman Golf Course on the north side of Airport Boulevard,
east of PGA West. These units are proposed for Tract 29348-1, 39 lots. Specific Plan 90-
015, Amendment #1 for The Norman Course, approved under Resolution 99-112, provides
the Community Design Guidelines for the residential units.
PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Proposed are three floor plans as follows:
Plan 1
size - 3,995 square feet
# of bedrooms - three
bathrooms- three and one-half
garage spaces - two with space for a golf cart
Plan 2
size -
3,563 square feet
# of bedrooms-
three
bathrooms -
three and one-half
garage spaces -
two with space for a golf cart
Plan 3
size -
# of bedrooms -
bathrooms -
garage spaces -
3,743 square feet
three
three and one-half
two and a space for a golf cart
pccup96032 007
Each of the three proposed prototypes has three facade alternatives. All three building
elevations propose "S" the roofs with varied roof styles. The walls are all clad with smooth
trowel plaster. Proposed architectural features consist of tower entries, arched inset
windows, multi pane windows, shutters, decorative wrought iron and exposed rafter tails,
plaster molded sofits and decorative chimneys. Maximum building heights of the one story
structures vary from 20 feet to 21 feet.
The exterior plaster colors will be in the range beige to light tan, with darker earth tone
accent colors and red blended tile roofs. Approximately three color combinations are
proposed.
Landscaping plans will be submitted separately at a later time.
FINDINGS:
As required by Section 9.210.010 Site Development Permits of the Zoning Ordinance, the
Committee is required to review and comment on the following findings:
1. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Section 9.60.330
(Residential Tract Development Review) of the Zoning Code.
RESPONSE: The proposal includes three facade design alternatives where
the Zoning Code requires a minimum of two alternatives. Each of the prototypes
proposes the use of a variety of roof heights and styles. Lastly, only one of the two
side elevations propose a single wall plane. A variety of window sizes and shapes
with surrounds are proposed to provide design interest.
2. The architectural design of the project, including but not limited to the architectural
style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and
other architectural elements, are compatible with surrounding development and with
the quality of design prevalent in the City. The Specific Plan design guidelines also
specify that the design of the residential units address the same issues.
RESPONSE: The proposed building design and materials are compatible with
the Specific Plan design guidelines in that a simplistic color scheme consisting of
an earth tone palette, variety of roof styles, walls clad in smooth trowel stucco and
wood and wrought iron used as accents are proposed. Additionally, the proposed
scale and massing create an interesting street scene to avoid visual monotony.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 99-665,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of building permits, detailed frontyard landscaping plans shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department
2. Prior to issuance of building permits, final working drawings shall be approved by
the Community Development Department.
pccup96032
Attachment:
Plan exhibits
Prepared and Submitted by:
Christine di lorio, Planning Manager
P"cuP
�96032 n o
r
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 5, 2000
CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 99-664
APPLICANT: TIBURON HOMES, LLC
ARCHITECTS: BBG ARCHITECTS
SOUTH COAST ARCHITECTS
HOVE DESIGN ALLIANCE ARCHITECTS
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR THREE NEW
PROTOTYPE RESIDENTIAL UNITS
LOCATION: TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE NORMAN GOLF COURSE, ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD, EAST OF MADISON
STREET
BACKGROUND:
The property is in the Norman golf course on the north side of Airport Boulevard, east
of PGA West. These units are proposed for Tract 29348-1, 19 lots on Royal St.
George, north of Tiburon Drive. This is the first request for approval of residential
units in the project. Specific Plan 90-015 Amendment #2 for The Norman Course,
approved under Resolution 99-1 12, provides the Community Design Guidelines for the
residential units.
PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Proposed are three plans as follows:
Plan 1 xt (BBG Architects)
size - 3,994 square feet with guest unit
# of bedrooms - four
baths- four
garage spaces - three
Plan (SCA)
size - 4,375 square feet
# of bedrooms - four
baths - three and one-half
garage spaces - three
C:alrc rpt sdp 99-664.wpd
Plan 2xa and 2xb (HOVE)
size - 4,716 square feet
# of bedrooms - four
baths - four and one-half
garage spaces - three
All of the plans are modifications of the plans presently being constructed in the Citrus
project by the applicant. The proposed plans are slightly larger and taller with most
having minor exterior changes, most prevalent on the rear elevations to take advantage
of the golf course views.
Each unit is designed by a different architect, but utilize a common
"Spanish/Mediterranean" theme. Architectural features commonly used include
combination hip and gable tile roofs, front courtyards, courtyards tower entries,
arches, smooth trowel plaster, multi pane windows and exposed rafters on the
facades, window and door trim, metal roll -up garage doors, and decorative chimneys.
Maximum building heights of the one story structures vary from 20 feet to 21 feet.
Each plan will have two facades, with the rear and sides the same within each plan.
The exterior plaster colors will be in the range beige to light tan, with darker earth tone
accent colors, and red blended tile roofs. Approximately five color combinations are
proposed, however, only one combination has been submitted at this time.
Landscaping plans have been submitted at this time. They will be submitted
separately at a later time.
FINDINGS:
As required by Section 9.210.010 (Site Development Permits) of the Zoning
Ordinance, the Committee is required to review and comment on the following
findings:
1. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Section 9.60.330
(Residential Tract Development Review) of the Zoning Code and Architectural
Guidelines of the Specific Plan (SP 90-015, Amendment #2).
RESPONSE: The design guidelines require a minimum of two different front
elevations, varied roof heights, and window and door surrounds for flat
elevation planes. The proposed units comply with these requirements in that
two facades per plan are proposed, roof heights are varied with the combination
of different roofs, and plaster surrounds are provided where required. The
C:alrc rpt sdp 99-664.wpd _ Oil
Specific Plan guidelines dictate architectural themes, exterior color ranges and
materials, and design criteria. The proposed plans are in compliance with these
items.
2. The architectural design of the project, including but not limited to the
architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details,
roof style, and other architectural elements, are compatible with surrounding
development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City.
RESPONSE: The architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors,
architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements of the units are
compatible with surrounding development to the south and east and with the
quality of design prevalent in the City in that the units are similar to approved
units the applicant has constructed in the Citrus project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 99-664,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Detailed front yard landscaping plans shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Community Development Department for approval prior to issuance of
any building permit for units authorized by this approval.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for any of the units authorized by this
approval, final working drawings shall be approved by the Community
Development Department.
Attachment:
1. Plan exhibits
Prepared by:
E), `5q W
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted by:
0 -06�O/C��
Christine di lorio, Planning Manager
C:alrc rpt sdp 99-664.wpd