1998 11 20 ALRCARCHITECTURE AND
FWAilp
_Y- .
REVIEW COMMITTEE
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the
La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California
November 20, 1998
9:00 A.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 98-V010
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing.
Please complete a 'Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes.
III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of the October 20, 1998 Minutes.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Case ........................
Applicant ..................
Location ...................
Request ....................
Action ......................
ALRC/AGENDA
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 98-631
Mainiero Smith and Associates, Inc. for A. G. Spans
Corporation
Southwest corner of Adams Street and 4-1' Avenue
Approval of architectural and landscaping plans for 160
condominium units on 10.17 acres.
Minute Motion 98- I.S.0 � U o o f
B. Case ........................
Applicant ..................
Location ...................
Request ....................
Action .....................
C. Case ........................
Applicant .................
Location ...................
Request ....................
Action .....................
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 98-638
Citrus Development, LLC (Peter Jacobs)
Tract 24890 in the Citrus project
Approval of architectural plans for a new prototype
residential unit
Minute Motion 98-
PLOT PLAN 94-543, AMENDMENT #1
David Chapman
50-981 Washington Street at the northwest corner of
Washington Street and Calle Tampico in the La Quinta
Village Shopping Center
Approval of building elevation modifications for a 550+
square foot expansion of an existing building (formerly
Sesame') for use as a restaurant.
Minute Motion 98-
D. Case ........................ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 98-09
Applicant .................. City of La Quinta
Location ................... Washington Street from 500 feet south of La Quinta
Evacuation Channel Bridge to Avenue 50.
Request .................... Approval of median and parkway landscaping
Action ..................... Minute Motion 98-
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
" t, 00412
ALRC/AGENDA
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
October 20, 1998 10:00 A.M.
L CALL TO ORDER
A. This meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Committee was called to order at
9:03 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di Iorio who lead the flag salute.
B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt and Dennis Cunningham.
C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Principal Planners Fred Baker and
Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer.
IL PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA:
A. Staff requested Business Item A be moved to the end of the agenda as the applicant
was not present. Unanimously approved.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. There being no changes to the Minutes of September 14, 1998, it was moved and
seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve the minutes as
submitted. Unanimously approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEM:
A. Site Development Permit 98-633; a request of TD Desert Development for approval
of development plans for a golf clubhouse and cart storage facility within Rancho La
Quinta.
Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff
report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
2. Stacy Dawn, architect for the project, Bill Williams, Project Manager, both
from WilliamsBlockstock Architects, Michael Hume, Rancho La Quint
Project Director, Michael Horton, Landscape Architect, and Grady Sparks,
Construction Manager for TD Desert Development, made a presentation on
their proposal.
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC10-20-98.wpd
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Meeting.
October 20. 1998
Committee Member Cunningham stated he liked the plans as they were in
keeping with the current design at the Rancho La Quinta.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt agreed on the architectural plans. Regarding the
landscaping he also agreed the plans were in keeping with the current site and
he had no objections.
There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee
Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 98-006
recommending approval of the architectural and landscaping plans for Site
Development Permit 98-633 as submitted. Unanimously approved.
B. Site Development Permit 98-634: a request of Rielly Homes, Inc. for approval of
architectural plans for six new prototype residential units.
Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff
report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department. Staff noted the landscape plans had not been submitted and
would have to be submitted to the Committee at a later date.
2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he appreciated the plans as presented. He
questioned staff as to whether the garage was slightly smaller that what was
allowed. It was his understanding they would have to conform to the current
development standards. Staff stated this was true. Committee Member
Bobbitt asked what the proposed sideyard setbacks were. Staff stated they
were 10 and 5 feet.
Mr. Forrest Haag, representing the applicant, stated he had a question on the
Conditions of Approval in regard to Plan 1. He clarified that it had been
mislabeled on the plans and it was not envisioned to be a Casita, but will be
a golf cart space. It is not an optional bedroom to the Casita. In regard to the
Condition for Plans 3 and 4, he asked if they could modify the plan by adding
a door in the foyer and removing a portion of the wall internally. This would
then allow enough room in the garage to accommodate a compact car. Staff
stated the ordinance requires the garage to be 10 X 20 feet in size. It does not
provide any flexibility to vary the size unless the specific plan were amended.
4. Committee Member Bobbit asked if the Casitas unit would always be deemed
as a bedroom. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio stated the Uniform
Building Code regulations stipulates it will always be considered a bedroom
and this is what triggers the extra garage for a four bedroom house.
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC 10-20-98.wpd 4-8 2
'JV 00
l�
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Meeting
October 20, 1998
Mr. Haag asked if the landscape plans would go to the Planning Commission
as well. Staff stated this was correct.
6. Committee Member Cunningham asked staff what their action should be.
Staff stated it could be a recommendation for approval as modified by the
Committee Members. Committee Member Cunningham stated it was an
excellent proposal and he had no objections.
Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the common ground area was part of the
association or homeowner responsibility. Mr. Haag stated it was unknown
at this time. He speculated it would follow the format that was adopted with
the KSL Merchant Builder past history, i.e., courtyard areas can be either
homeowner maintained or if they have a more open approach that can be an
impact to the association as a whole, it will become the responsibility of the
homeowners' association. Discussion followed regarding the responsibility
of the courtyard area.
There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Committee
Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to adopt Minute Motion 98-007
recommending approval of Site Development Permit 98-634 subject to the
following modifications to the conditions:
a. Condition #2 modified to remove Plan 1.
b. Adding a condition that the proposed floor plans delete any reference
to a Casitas on Plan 1.
Unanimously approved.
C. Village Use Permit 98-001; a request of JTL Property, Inc., James Lewis, for
approval of development plans to remodel and construct a 1050 square foot addition
to a 2,438 square foot existing building for use as a day spa and beauty salon.
Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff
report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
2. Mr. James Lewis, representing JTL Property, Inc., stated he had some
concerns regarding the conditions relating to the east elevation facing the
parking lot. His concern was that this side of the building was to be used
primarily for the spa operation and usually dictates a dark environment. To
add windows is contrary to the nature of the business. They would not object
to a mural or some type of architectural treatment.
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCIO-20-98.wpd #.a.`)"3 005
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Meeting
October 20, 1998
3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he agreed with staff s recommendation
that some treatment was needed. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio stated
that due to the sensitivity of the masseuse issue, staff was recommending a
glass block window treatment. Mr. Lewis stated this was a very expensive
idea.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated his concern was that landscaping can
tend to be temporary. He could understand not wanting to go to the expense
of installing a window, but some type of hard structure was needed. In
addition, he needed to keep in mind the Village theme. Staff stated it should
be designed for pedestrian traffic. Discussion followed as to possible
alternatives for the east elevation.
5. Mr. Lewis stated they wanted to create a gated parking lot to eliminate the
problem of the parking lot being used as a street by the tenants of the
apartments. They intended to increase and add to the landscaping, but did not
want to go structurally into the building at this time.
6. Staff asked if the plastering would be altered. Mr. Lewis stated they did not
intend to at this time.
7. Committee Member Bobbitt asked why staff was wanting the glass block
added. Staff stated to give more relief to the exterior. Mr. Lewis discussed
the changes they were proposing for the exterior of the building.
8. Committee Member Cunningham made several suggestions that could be
used to add architectural treatment to the elevation.
9. Committee Member Bobbitt asked how the landscaping would be maintained
after the business was open. Mr. Lewis stated a contractor would be hired to
maintain the site. Discussion followed regarding the east property line which
had a problem of being unsightly. Mr. Lewis stated he would like to build a
wall between the two lots if he does not purchase the lot and incorporate it
into his site.
10. Committee Member Cunningham asked about staff s recommendation for a
trellis over the entrance. Mr. Lewis stated they were considering some
fountains and eliminating the steps. He also stated they were using very
massive doors to create a statement at the entrance. Discussion followed
regarding alternatives to the entry area.
11. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the existing windows that faced
Eisenhower Drive. Mr. Lewis stated they would stay as they are.
12. Committee Member Cunningham asked if treatment would be added to the
west side elevation and wrap around to the north elevation to soften the
Ct\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCl0-20-98.wpd O /_. 4
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Meeting
October 20, 1998
appearance. Mr. Lewis stated they would incorporate continuity from the
other elevations including windows on the north elevation. Staff suggested
surrounds be used on the existing and proposed windows.
13. Following discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member
Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 98-008 recommending
approval of Village Use Permit 98-001 for architectural plans with staffs
recommendations and an entry statement treatment being added to Condition
46.
D. Site Development Permit 97-632; a request of Century Crowell Communities for
approval of architectural plans for four new prototype residential units.
Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff
report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
Committee Member Cunningham asked about the compatibility issue. Staff
stated they were recommending variety in the proposed roof design all
consisting of a side facing gable having a single ridge line.
Committee Member Bobbitt asked if two story units would give enough relief
to the roofs that staff was wanting. Staff stated the applicant is not planning
to build any two story units.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated two story units do not sell in the
desert, and the City does not want to dictate the market. Committee Member
Bobbitt stated his concern was that if two story units exist now and if this
tract does not have any, this alone can affect the streetscape. Also, if they
state they are going to construct the two story units and then change their
mind due to the market demand, it could create a problem. Staff stated it is
easier to require the roof line changes in height than to require two story
units.
5. Staff reviewed the conditions with the Committee. Following discussion it
was determined the height of each of the prototypes would be required to be
varied to between 18-22 feet. Alternatives were discussed as to how the roof
line could be varied.
6. Committee Member Cunningham stated that to require a change in the roof
line was asking for a major constructural change. Clipping the gable ends and
asking for a variation in height of the roof is enough unless there are other
prototypes that are available for the developer to draw from.
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCI O-20-98.wpd +p• C,'� 00-/
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Meeting
October 20. 1998
7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee
Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 98-009
recommending approval of Site Development Permit 97-632 to the Planning
Commission with the conditions as recommended and modified as follows:
a. The entry element of Plan 4 for both elevations "A" and `B" shall be
raised a minimum of one foot on the ridge.
b. One prototype plan for both elevations "A" and `B" shall have
clipped gables for the main roof.
C. Each prototype for both elevations "A" and `B"shall vary in height
between 18 to 22 feet.
Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
V. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS:
VI. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Bobbitt/Cunningham to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping
Committee to the next regular meeting to be held on November 16, 1998. This meeting was
adjourned at 10:46 a.m. on October 20, 1998.
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC I0-20-98.wpd QO �i 6
J
BI #A
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1998
CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 98-631
APPLICANT/
ENGINEER: MAINIERO, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR A.G.
SPANOS CORPORATION
ARCHITECT: MR. LAWRENCE W. PEPPER
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT: RHA, INCORPORATED
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR 160 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 10.17 ACRES
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ADAMS STREET AND 47T"
AVENUE
Siw istoiy
The 10-acre vacant, graded site is located at the southwest corner of 47" Avenue and
Adams Street (Attachment 1). The site also backs onto Dulce Del Mar, a private street
in Lake La Quinta. Parkway landscaping improvements exist on the perimeter streets,
and a six-foot high screen wall exists on Adams Street and along the west property
line.
Lake La Quinta-History
Lake La Quinta, a gated community, consists of approximately 281 single family home
sites oriented around a 24-acre lake and other common lots. Tract 24230, the initial
subdivision map for Lake La Quinta, was approved by the City Council on July 5, 1989
(i.e., Resolution 89-85).
The Lake La Quinta development is approximately half finished with single story
houses, up to 22' in height excluding tower elements, ranging in size from
approximately 1,804 square feet to over 3,700 square feet. Generally the existing
houses have flat barrel or S-tile concrete roof tiles. The walls are stucco. Windows
ARC Spanos98-28
Page 1 of 4
have stucco surrounds and many are multi -pane. Roof eave treatments are also varied
(e.g., exposed rafter tails, box stucco, etc.).
Project -Request
Proposed are ten types of buildings, each with different floor plans and building
elevations. Floor plans are one- and two -bedrooms ranging in size from 792 square
feet to 1,121 square feet. All buildings are two stories, with a maximum 30'-2"
height and 4:12 roof pitch. The varied building types create different street elevations.
Each proposed building type's roof will be covered with flat concrete tiles and walls
will be clad with stucco. Proposed roof styles are a combination of modified hip and
gable. Multi -pane windows are proposed, on the first floor, with single pane single
hung sash windows on the second story. The proposed first floor windows will have
stucco surrounds. All proposed windows including the sliding glass doors will have
aluminum frames. Each of the proposed units have covered outdoor patios or
balconies.
Attached garages are proposed for several of the building types. They too will have
tile hip and modified hip roofs and stucco walls. The roll -up garage doors are multi -
panel metal. Carport structures are freestanding and constructed of prefabricated
metal. Support posts are located toward the front of the parking stall area. The
design of the detached garages was not submitted for review.
The recreation complex, proposed within the northeast corner of the project area, will
be single story and a maximum 23'-9" in height (i.e., 7:12 roof pitch). Proposed are
two buildings attached with an open air breezeway. Each building will have a hip roof
covered with flat concrete tiles. A six-foot building offset is proposed. The proposed
walls will be clad_ in stucco to match other on -site buildings. Fixed pane and multi -
pane windows are provided. Solid, flat roofed patio covers are provided at each of the
four building entrances.
Landscaping plans reflect a varied plant palette for the project. Palm trees, varying in
height from 10' to 20', will accentuate the project entrance at the recreation building.
Trees are spread throughout the development in clusters or a linear pattern as depicted
along the west property line. Other trees consist of African sumac, California pepper
and Bottle for parking areas, and other types for interior common areas. (See the
attached information.) Trees are generally 15 gallon in size and spaced at 20-foot to
120-foot intervals.
ARC Spanos98-28
Page 2 of 4
010
SSaif Comments
Architecturally, the proposed plans are consistent in character to surrounding Lake La
Quinta houses in terms of exterior materials and textures.
As required by Section 9.210.010 (Site Development Permits) of the Zoning
Ordinance, the Committee is required to review and comment on the following
findings:
ArchThe architectural style, scale, building mass, materials,
colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are
compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design
prevalent in the City. The height of the recreation building shall be lower to 22'
high as required by Section 9.50.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff is also
recommending minor design changes to the buildings types with garages,
specifically deleting the middle gable end as it appears "tacked on." All the
roofs' hip and gables provide enough variation that the addition of this detail
unnecessary in addition to not being needed. Lastly, Buildings 6, 7, 9 and 10
have proposed stucco popouts on the second floor side elevations that appear
out of balance, as windows are not proposed to define their function or have a
base for the appearance of support.
Landscape -Design - Assess landscaping including location, type, size, color,
texture, and coverage of plant materials, and screening; provide a harmonious
transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open
space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity
of the project. Selected plant materials are appropriate for this climate, provided
tree sizes are increased along the project's exterior boundaries and adjacent to
open parking areas.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 98-631,
subject to the following conditions:
1 . Specimen trees (24-, 36- and 48-inch boxes) shall be used for planting purposes
around the project perimeter and adjacent to open parking spaces.
2. The overall height of the recreation building shall be reduced to 22-feet to
comply with Section 9,50.020 of the Zoning Ordinance. This design change
shall be made before building permits are issued.
ARC Spanos98-28
Page 3 of 4
-0 i.; 0.1
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to the Community Development
Department approval, the building elevations shall be modified as follows: 1)
Remove the middle gable eave-end from garage elevations, and 2) Modify eave
mounted architectural popouts on side building elevations of Buildings 6, 7, 9
and 10 to match other buildings.
4. Detached garage structures shall be architecturally compatible with other on -site
buildings including stucco walls and hip, tile roofs.
Attachments:
1 . Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Architectural and Landscaping Plans (Committee only)
Prepared by: Submitted by:
Greg T ell, Associate Planner Christine di lorio, Planning Manager
ARC Spanos98-28
Page 4 of 4
1..•
o.l a
ATTACHMENTS
ni3
Site
WHIT�AT��
C�NNEI 7--
41
0
E,IA
C-7
t
F
-F-I
HIGHWAY111
---- - -
L
L
o-Y
C�f
Site
-PjJH
1-1-DTF1
48TH AVENUE
T,
12,
Vir 41
0] Lf
!e � gFaeeee2aaea see =
� ° sc,sxa^:zxas s8s. s
pp i' eeHBH a --a'ea9ex_' as e t
!aaa
pYp pp�:Q y yy ?�� e9T�C = a 3 SF:x4:3FR 98 fR5 'eCg _ p S:
'.a 8:R:8��aY_
:off Fk � �$xa33�k
J l I ��-
,
zQ
Q
J z
CLoZ
zJ
QIfo o
f
Q Qo
Z co
oZ
�Q
U5
p
i
W.
3
q
CA i 6
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ARCHITECT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
BACKGROUND•_
NOVEMBER 16, 1998
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 98-638
CITRUS DEVELOPMENT, LLC (PETER JACOBS)
ARTEK GROUP
APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR A NEW
PROTOTYPE RESIDENTIAL UNIT
TRACT 24890 IN THE CITRUS PROJECT
The proposal is for approval of a new residential prototype plan for Tract 24890 within
the Citrus project, on the west side of Jefferson Street, north of 52nd Avenue.
Variations of one of the previously approved Heritage (3771 square feet) and one of
the Masters Collection (4542 square feet) prototype plans were approved for the
applicant on September 23, 1997. A 4,084 square foot unit was approved for the
applicant on May 12, 1998. Construction of these units has begun on Cetrino.
PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Proposed is a floor plan with 4,408 square feet. The unit has three bedrooms with an
office/library/bedroom, and 3.5 bathes. The unit is Spanish/Mediterranean in nature,
utilizing plaster walls, wood beams rafters, and clay tile roofing. Colors of the plaster
are white to light tan, with wood colors light tans to brown, and roof tile a brown
blend to match previously approved colors. Roof height and type is varied and used
in combinations. The maximum height is 20'-6", with other lower heights due to the
roof variety. Special features include rounded plaster corners, plaster popouts around
all windows, decorative concrete columns supporting an entry trellis, decorative
wrought iron accents, and exposed wood rafter tails. The prototype proposes one
facade, with building sides and rears being the same within each plan. A second
facade may be available at the meeting for review. One space of the three car garage
will be a side entry space and sectional roll -up doors are proposed.
�..n_ 076
C:alrc rpt sdp 98-638
Typical front yard landscaping plans have not been submitted for the plan, but are
expected to be similar to those previously approved.
Staff Comments
As required by Section 9.60.300 (Compatibility Review) of the Zoning Ordinance, the
Committee is required to review and comment on the following findings:
1. The architectural and other design elements of the new residential units will be
compatible and not detrimental to the other existing units in the projects.
2. The proposed single family residences will be compatible to existing dwellings
with respect to architectural materials such as roof material, window treatment,
and garage door style, colors, roof lines, and lot area.
Response3to #1.and #2:
The proposed units are the same architectural design, colors, and materials.
The units utilize similar architectural features such as varying roof heights,
rounded corners, and window trim.
3. At least one specimen tree (min. 24-inch box size (minimum 2.5" caliper), and
minimum 10 feet tall, measured from top of box) shall be provided in the front
yard or street side yard.
Response:
The proposed landscaping plans will be required to provide a minimum of one
24" box size tree in the front yard area. All units will have at least one
additional tree and other shrubs and groundcover.
RECOMMENDATION_
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 98-638,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The preliminary landscape plans shall be submitted to the Community
Development for approval prior to issuance of first permit for this unit type. The
plans shall include at least one 24" box size tree on each lot shall be at least 10
feet tall, with all box size trees having a minimum caliper of 2'/z ".
Prior to issuance of first building permit for this unit type, the building plans
shall be revised to show stucco surrounds on side and rear elevations where
appropriate, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.
Ctalrc rpt sdp 98-638
017
Attachment:
Plan exhibits
Prepared by:
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted by: /f
G� J
Christine di lorio, 6anning Manager
�.. C:alrc rpt sdp 98-638 td 8
:
CASE Nm � NORTH
SITE DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT 98-638 SCALE:
LOCATION MAP I NTS
0 tq
BI #C
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1998
CASE NO.: PLOT PLAN 94-543, AMENDMENT #1
APPLICANT: DAVID CHAPMAN
ARCHITECT: HABITAT
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF BUILDING ELEVATION MODIFICATIONS
FOR A 550+ SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION OF AN
EXISTING BUILDING (FORMERLY SESAME') FOR USE AS
A RESTAURANT
LOCATION: 50981 WASHINGTON STREET AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO
IN THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER
(ATTACHMENT 1)
BACKGROUND: -
The applicant is proposing to expand remodel, and use the former Sesame' restaurant.
This request entails interior and exterior remodeling and additions to the north and
south ends of the building. The site is within the current boundaries of the Village
guidelines area. The project was developed in 1993 and 1994, and is subject to the
CN (Neighborhood Commercial) Zone District requirements.
PROJECT PROPOSAL:
The modifications consist of enclosing a small part of the covered entry, relocating the
entry door further to the west, enclosing a portion of the covered outdoor seating area,
and minor exterior changes.
The entry area addition is approximately 10' x 18' and will be provided with windows
to the north and west. The remaining addition at the southeast corner of the building,
will move the existing windows out approximately eight feet to align with the existing
columns which support the arcade. Windows to match the existing windows will be
provided. The door to the outdoor area will be relocated one archway to the west.
�4
C:alrc rpt 94-543 amend 7
Other modifications consists of new larger windows on the west elevation and
elimination of a utility door on the east elevation facing Washington Street. A new
trellis will be provided on the concrete columns at the southwest corner of the
building. The building will be repainted to match the beige of the main shopping
center.
The site is fully landscaped and no changes are proposed at this time.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The addition has been designed to be compatible with the materials, colors, and design
features of the existing building.
FINDINGS:
As required by Section 9.65.040 (Village Use Permits) of the Zoning Code, the
Committee is required to review and comment on the following findings:
Architectural Desian- The architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors,
architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements are compatible with
the surrounding development and with the quality of design illustrated in the Village
at La Quinta Guidelines.
Response;:
1. The proposed construction matches the existing building and materials
will be maintained. The building will be painted to match the main
shopping center. The revised project promotes the element of human
scale and architectural variety, as desired in the Village at La Quinta
Design Guidelines.
Landscape Design- Project landscaping, including but not limited to the location, type,
size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to
provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements
and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between
adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall
unifying influence, design and elements of the Village Use Permit are compatible with
surrounding development and the concepts of the Village at La Quinta Design
Guidelines.
Response:
1. Due to the location of the proposed additions to the existing building,
new landscaping is not needed. New landscaping will be primarily to
replace dead plants.
Cealrc rpt 94-543 amend 1 `/�®
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Plot Plan 94-543, Amendment
#1, subject to the following conditions:
1. Final architectural working drawings, substantially conforming to this approval
shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval
prior to submission of plans to the Building and Safety Department.
2. The exterior colors shall match those used in the shopping center.
Attachments:
1. Location map
3. Plan exhibits
Prepared by:
L b4&Al
Stan Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted by:
Christine di lorio, P anning Manager
�aa
C:alrc rpt 94-543 amend 1
ATTACHME
1
W17
NORTH
CASE No. PLOT PLAN 94-543
AMENDMENT #1 SCALE
NTS
Oa3
BI #D
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1998
CASE NO.: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 98-09
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT: HOLMES & NARVER INC. / RAY LOPEZ ASSOCIATES
REQUEST: APPROVAL OF MEDIAN AND PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
LOCATION: WASHINGTON STREET, FROM 500 FEET SOUTH OF THE LA
QUINTA EVACUATION CHANNEL BRIDGE TO AVENUE 50
BACKGROUND::
This landscaping project is part of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 98-09, which
involves the widening of the Washington Street bridge at the La Quinta Evacuation
Channel. The scope of this project involves the ultimate widening of the existing
Washington Street bridge, as well as full width street right-of-way improvements,
including median and median landscaping, parkway landscaping, and traffic signal
improvements at the Avenue 50 / Washington Street intersection. This project has
been advanced in response to Council concern over this entrance into the La Quinta
Village core. Upon completion, Washington Street will be open to its ultimate General
Plan classification.
The project layout has been designed in accordance with the General Plan designation
for Washington Street (major arterial), and will provide for six lanes of traffic divided
by an 18-feet-wide landscaped median. Upon completion, a 12-feet-wide landscaped
parkway will be provided along the west side of Washington Street, north of the
bridge. However, parkway improvements beyond the curb along the east side of
Washington Street, north of the bridge, have been deferred until such time as required
upon development of the adjacent property.
To facilitate street and bridge widening, the project will demolish existing landscaping
improvements adjacent to the Duna La Quinta development and remove all of the
mature Eucalyptus trees and Date Palm trees along Washington Street. In their place,
the project proposes a 6-feet-wide sidewalk and 5-feet of perimeter landscaping
F:\PWDEPT\STAFF\FULLER\RERDRT9\1998\981116b.wptl
si� 'g
City staff have coordinated with the Homeowners Associations within the Duna La
Quinta development, as well as KSL Land Corporation, owners of adjacent properties
impacted by this project. Each have expressed their approval to staff of the proposed
conceptual plans.
Project Proposal
Landscape Plans - Washington Street - The landscape architect is proposing median
and parkway landscaping improvements consistent with previous City projects. The
proposed landscaping will greatly resemble the existing landscaping along Washington
Street, from Calle Tampico to the La Quinta Village shopping center. Numerous native
plants are proposed, such as Palms, Acacias, Crape Myrtles, Pepper Trees, as well as
Bougainvillea, Ocotillo, Barrel Cactus, and various other shrubs as indicated in the
preliminary landscape plans.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of the Preliminary Landscape Plans
for Capital Improvement Project 98-09.
Attachment:
Washington Street Bridge Widening Over La Quinta Evacuation Channel -
Preliminary Landscape Plans, and Photo Plant Palette (for Committee Members
only).
Prepared & Submitted by:
Steve Speer enior Engineer
�/
F.\PW UEPT\STAFF\FULLER\ftEPURTS\1998\961116b. wptl "?5-