Loading...
2001 11 07 ALRCLa� Q•c � S CF'y OF TNt°t- ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California November 7, 2001 10:00 A.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2001-045 CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call II. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and lirnit your comments to three minutes. Ill. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes for October 3, 2001. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-720 Applicant ................ Rancho Capistrano Development Corporation Location .................. North of Avenue 54 and east of Jefferson Street, within Country Club of the Desert Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for a new casitas prototype residential plan Action .................... Minute Motion 2001- ALRC/AGENDA r&. U v 0 0 1 ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE B. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-719 Applicant ................ Puerta Azul Holdings Location ................. 57-325 Madison Street Request .................. Review of building elevations and landscaping plans for four prototype resort villa units with two facades each Action .................... Minute Motion 2001- C. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-718 Applicant ................ Sedona Homes Location ................. Southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for three new prototype residential units with three facades each Action .................... Minute Motion 2001- D. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-717 Applicant ................ KSL Development Corporation Location ................. Southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 54 Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for a merchant builder welcome center in PGA West Action .................... Minute Motion 2001- E. Item ....................... VILLAGE USE PERMIT 2001-013 Applicant ................ La Quinta Grill Location ................. East side of Avenida Bermudas between Calle Cadiz and Calle Barcelona Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for three office buildings on an existing restaurant site Action .................... Minute Motion 2001- F. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 Applicant ................ RLF Development Location ................. Southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for a neighborhood commercial shopping center consisting of a supermarket and multiple ancillary buildings. Action .................... Minute Motion 2001- ALRC/AGENDA .!,moo U U 0 0 2 ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS VIII. ADJOURNMENT ALRC/AGENDA c-VV v 11 0O3 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA October 3, 2001 CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:03 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di lorio, who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham and Bill Bobbitt. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planners Stan Sawa and Fred Baker, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. IL PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Planning Manager Christine di lorio asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of September 5, 2001. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve the minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2001-671, Amendment #1; a request of Toll Bros. for review of architectural plans for one new prototype residential unit on the north side of Airport Boulevard, east of Madison Street within the Norman Golf Course 1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like to address the commission. Mr. Gary Lemon stated he was in agreement with the staff's recommendation. r G:\WPDOCSURLCW ,RC 10-3-0l.wpd 1 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes October 3, 2001 3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-039 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-671, Amendment #1, subject to the conditions as recommended. B. Site Development Permit 2001-715; a request of Sean Kearney for review of architectural plans for a single family residence located at 78- 775 Lowe Drive, within Acacia. 1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he had a potential conflict of interest due to the proximity of his residence to this home and therefore, withdrew from the meeting. 3. There being no quorum due to the possible conflict of interest, the application was removed from the agenda and no action was taken. C. Site Development Permit 2001-714; a request of John Vuksic for elevations and landscaping plans for one retail building (Building #2) located at the northwest corner of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street within Point Happy Specific Plan 1 . Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if they were windows or blockout as shown on the elevations. Staff stated it was to be windows and the applicant could explain in more detail. 3. Mr. John Vuksic, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. 4. Committee Member Cunningham asked what the users would be Mr. Vuksic stated so far they had a Tuxedo shop and realtor. Committee Member Cunningham stated he liked the windows on Washington Street with the pop -outs, and asked if there were any City codes that would preclude someone from advertising in the G:AWPDOCSVARLCW,RC 10-3-0l.wpd 2 t -0 V 5` Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes October 3. 2001 window. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated the Specific Plan and Sign Ordinance which restricts the amount of window advertising. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what material the window frames would be constructed of. Mr. Vuksic stated they were a sage green aluminum. 6. Committee Member Cunningham stated he had no issues and thought it would be a good addition to the center. 7. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he agreed. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-040 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-714, as recommended. D. Site Development Permit 2001-708; a request of Tom Lathrop for review of building elevations and landscaping plans for a 25,240 square foot two story building located on Avenue 47, west of Adams Street within the Washington Square Specific Plan 1 . Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Tom Lathrop gave a presentation on the project. 3. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the exterior would be a sand finish. Mr. Lathrop stated it would be machine sprayed, and noted some of the architectural details on the building. Committee Member Cunningham stated the gables portico in the upper center appears to be light in stature in relation to the balance of the building. The columns on either side do not carry down with scale. Planning Manager Christine di lorio asked if the Committee wanted the columns enhanced and increase the size of the quatrafoil. Committee Member Cunningham stated yes. Mr. Lathrop stated this side of the building is pushed very close to Avenue 47 so you are basically within 20 feet of the building when driving by. Across the street is residential and he was not G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\ALRC 10-3-0l.wpd 3 ©�� Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes October 3, 2001 trying to make any type of a statement, but actually playing it down. Committee Member Cunningham stated he didn't want to add detail, but that the building seemed out of balance and should have something to balance the weight of the entire building. Discussion followed regarding the roof line. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it was a standard desert plant pallette. Some of the tree varieties are fast growing and are short rooted which tends to make them high maintenance. He would not use as many of this variety because they are high maintenance and can be a liability if not maintained. In addition, the date; palms in front of the building should be bought at a younger stage because the older ones can be a liability in high traffic areas because of crown drop. The large planting areas for the shade trees are great as the trees will be healthier. Mr. Lathrop stated they were restricted on what plants they could use because: of the Washington Square Specific Plan. Discussion followed on date palm trees. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-041 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-708, as recommended. a. Prior to issuance of building permit revise the south building elevation increasing the size of the portico columns and the quatrafoil to match the lower gable on either side of the main structure. E. Village Use Permit 2001-010; a request of Edwin G. Cosek (Andrews Bar and Grill) for review of exterior remodeling plans for an existing one story commercial restaurant building (formerly Chez Monique) on 0.17 acres to include outdoor patio dining, landscaping and vehicle parking areas located at 78-121 Avenida La Fonda. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Ed Cosek stated he was available to answer any questions. G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\ALRC10-3-0l.wpd 4 ,r �!� t) oo Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes October 3. 2001 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the steel tubing indicated on the patio cover. Mr. Cosek stated the steel columns would be supporting the main beam that the rafters run on. The steel beams would be covered with resawn cedar and stained to match. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what would be on top of the lattice for shade. Mr. Cosek stated it would be an open lattice. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern was that the wood would warp and turn. Mr. Cosek stated they would be: using blocking and are adding a fascia in front. It would also be stained. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that if they were to have the open ends it should have some type of gingerbread finish. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated he would suggest a laminated material or paralams for the patio cover. Committee Member Cunningham stated the blocking would not keep the wood from turning. The only thing he has found that works in the desert is gluilams or paralam as they will not turn and will stain well. He then asked how the existing roof ties in, or does not tie in with the existing fascia. Mr. Cosek stated they would be removing the existing fascia and run the boards back underneath. The pilasters will be stuccoed the same color as the building. They would be using lexon glass enclosures rather than wrought iron on the windows. Committee Member Cunningham stated his only concern was the use of woods and would recommend paralams be used. Discussion followed on how the roof construction would tie in. 5. Staff asked if the Committee had any concern regarding the box frame system not having lattice work above. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he had seen some that are open and are attractive if heavy enough. He asked the size of the wood. Staff stated they would be 4" X 6". 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-042 recommending approval of Village Use Permit 2001-010 as amended: a. Paralams shall be used for the patio cover joists. F. Village Use Permit 2001-012; a request of Santa Rosa Plaza, LLC for review of landscaping and architectural plans for 18 buildings "Casitas" portion of a 14 acre site to be located on the north side of Calle Tampico, between Desert Club and Avenida Bermudas. 008 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\ALRC10-3-0Lwpd 5 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes October 3, 2001 Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like to say anything. Mr. Dan Brown, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the height of the buildings. Mr. Brown stated 26 feet. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the brackets shown on the elevations and whether or not they were structural. Mr. Brown stated they were not structural and were made out of wood. Committee Member Bobbitt went over the plant list and suggested they eliminate the eucalyptus trees. Barrel Cactus are expensive and can be a liability. Committee Member Bobbitt recommended the date palms be inspected and young in age. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated he liked the project and had no objections. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-043 recommending approval of Village Use Permit 2001- 012, as recommended. G. Site Development Permit 99-659; a request of Point Happy Ranch LLC for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a mixed use project consisting of commercial buildings and senior care living in villas and multi -tenant buildings located on the west side of Washington Street, south of Highway 111. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like to address the Committee. Mr. Dennis Sunstrom, the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. G:AWPDOCSWtLCWLRC 10-3-01.wpd 6 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes October 3, 2001 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that on an existing date grove it is wise to get rid of all the older trees. The design of the buildings are dramatic and very attractive. He asked what the commercial uses would be. Mr. Sunstrom stated they would primarily support the residential use of the facility. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated the historical value is a private value in this case. It is a good project and he has no objections. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/ Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-044 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 99- 659, as recommended. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None JII�K�]PiIJil1����PiIgPi13�:11���i�t6Yl VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on November 7, 2001. This meeting was adjourned at 11:18 a.m. on October 3, 2001. Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California •t_ou 0�0 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\ALRC 10-3-0 Lwpd 7 BI #A ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO. APPLICANT: ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: REQUEST: LOCATION BACKGROUND: NOVEMBER 7, 2001 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-720 RANCHO CAPISTRANO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BBG ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A NEW CASITAS PROTOTYPE RESIDENTIAL PLAN NORTH OF 54T" AVENUE AND EAST OF JEFFERSON STREET, WITHIN COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT The project site is within Country Club of the Desert, a golf oriented 819 unit residential project on 988 acres, approved by the City Council in November, 2000. This request is the second for residential units (Casitas Product) in the project. The Villas Product (detached single family units) was approved by the Planning Commission on September 11,2001 for 85 lots The first golf course, clubhouse and maintenance building are under construction, with the main guard gate approved for construction. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Proposed is what the applicant describes as a "semi -attached" town homes. The unit is basically a duplex structure consisting of two units with each unit on its own lot. These units are intended to primarily be short term or rental units. One floor plan is proposed. The following is a description of the plan: size - # of bedrooms - Unit "A" - 1,804 square feet Unit "B" - 1,706 square feet Casita which be part of either unit - 585 Square feet two per unit plus casita for one of the units P:\STAN\sdp 2001-720 alrc rpt ccod.wpd •` .91 ) baths - 2.5 per unit plus one for casita unit detached carport spaces - one per unit maximum building height - 15'-6" - one story These units will be constructed on 21 lots on Via Pontito near the northwest corner of the project adjacent to the Coachella Canal. The architecture and materials of the units is similar to that used in the clubhouse and main guard house. Architectural features include articulated tile roofs combining gable and hip roofs, exposed rafters, inset front windows, covered rear patios, and front courtyards. All exteriors of the units will be plastered with some wood trim. Two facades for each structure consisting of two units are proposed. Exterior materials include light sand finish plaster walls, wood trim and plaster headers. The roof material will "S" the in a red blend. Material colors include tan to light brown plaster, and brown to gray accent and wood trim colors. The detached carport trellis structures will be supported by cantera stone columns and topped with a wood trellis. The wood trellis will use a combination of 6"x12", 6"x10", and 4"x6' beams. The landscaping plans include a conceptual tree plan for the street and a conceptual planting plan for a typical casita. Plant material include plants and trees approved in their specific plan. The trees range from 24" to 36" box size with shrubs 5 gallons and ground cover one gallon. Each casita will have approximately seven trees planted around it. FINDINGS: As required by Section 9.210.010 (Site Development Permits) of the Zoning Ordinance, the Committee is required to review and comment on the following findings: 1. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Section 9.60.330 (Residential Tract Development Review) of the Zoning Code and Architectural Guidelines of the Specific Plan (SP 99-35). RESPONSE: The Zoning Code design guidelines require a minimum of two different front elevations, varied roof heights, and window and door surrounds for flat elevation planes. The proposed units comply with these requirements in that two facades for the plan is proposed, roof heights are varied with the combination of different roofs, and headers are provided where required. The P:\STAN\sdp 2001-720 alrc rpt ccod.wpd Specific Plan guidelines dictate an architectural theme, exterior color ranges and materials, and design criteria. The proposed plans are also in compliance with these items. 2. The architectural design of the project, including but not limited to the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements, are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. RESPONSE: The architectural styles, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements of the units are attractive and compatible with surrounding development to the south and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. 3. Project landscaping, including but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials has been designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, and complement the surrounding project area, ensuring lower maintenance and water use. RESPONSE: The plans provide conceptual design and planting information for the front yards. The pallette includes those plants specified in the specific plan, as well as additional compatible plants. Staff review of detailed plans for these plans is recommended. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 720, subject to the following conditions: 1. Detailed front yard and streetscape landscaping plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department for approval prior to issuance of any building permit for units authorized by this approval. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for any of the units authorized by this approval, final working drawings shall be approved by the Community Development Department. P:\STAN\sdp 2001-720 alrc rpt ccod.wpd 013 Attachment: Plan exhibit book Prepared by: Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner Submitted by: Christine di lorio, Planning Manager P:\STAN\sdp 2001-720 alrc rpt ccod.wpd ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO. : NOVEMBER 7, 2001 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-719 REQUEST: BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR FOUR PROTOTYPE RESORT VILLA UNITS WITH TWO FACADES EACH LOCATION: 57325 MADISON STREET (MADISON, NORTH OF AVENUE 58) APPLICANT: PUERTA AZUL HOLDINGS ZONING: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RMH) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR) SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USE: NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL) SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL) EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL) WEST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL) BACKGROUND: The currently vacant project site, located on Madison Street, north of Avenue 58, consists of one parcel totaling 19.64 acre. The project site is within Puerta Azul Specific Plan 2001-0053, adopted by City Council on May 15, 2001, which establishes guidelines and standards in a focused development plan for the . distribution of land uses, location and sizing of supporting infrastructure, development standards, and requirements for public improvements. The Design Guidelines portion of the Plan provides design criteria which includes Architectural Guidelines utilizing a contemporary interpretation of Colonial Spanish and California Mission style architecture; and Landscape Guidelines that complement and accent the project with perimeter landscaping along Madison Street. A Sculpture Park was approved by the City in 1993 on the relatively Flat site. Improvements remaining since the closure of the facility include: a single family house and another building, a swimming pool, a lake, an interior concrete driveway and walkway, remnant sculpture pieces, and an entry gate. A:\LARC SDP 2001-719.wpd �e'0 015 Project Proposal The Puerta Azul Specific Plan allows the clustering of 4-6 units around a common courtyard/driveway with one car garages and private walled backyards. Proposed are four Colonial Spanish genre resort villas prototype elevations; three units are one story and one unit is two story with each floor plan having two elevations. The one story units have interconnecting hip and gable roofs and heights ranging from 1 6' 8" to 18' 1 " with a concrete "S" the and chimney projections that have ceramic tile accent. Tower element front door entry features are highlighted with ceramic Talavera tile trim; Plan 2 has a circular or round entry option. Covered wood trellis patios are supported by precast stone columns. Walls are "Coconut Colada" colored stucco with a grey stucco base trim; light brown wood one car garage roll -up doors are continue the use of the wood element. Multi - pane windows are recessed and trimmed with the accent grey stucco. Proposed for the two story units are interconnecting hip roofs at 22' 10" with a concrete "S" the and chimney projections that have ceramic tile accent. The second level proposes two bedrooms, a bath, and a deck with metal railings. Walls garage doors, and windows design and detail are similar ro the one story elevations. The proposed four prototype resort villas includes the following space: Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Plan 4 2 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 2 Bedroom/Den 3 Bedroom 2 Bath 2 Bath 2 Bath/Den 2 Bath Livable Space (s. f.) 1315 1502 1504 1725 Garage Space (s. f.) 258 263 254 270 Covered Patio (s. f.) 128 447 313 77(deck) Landscape Plan The Landscaping Plan identifies a pallette of plant material for the first phase of the project consisting of shrubs, groundcover, and trees for the on -site parking planters and the building planters, and Madison Street frontage (as required by Specific Plan approval). Proposed for the landscape setback along Madison are Chilean Mesquite and Date Palm trees, and shrubs such as Red Bird of Paradise, Texas Olive, and Bougainvillea are proposed. Street trees proposed within the project include. Chilean Mesquite, Jacaranda, and Desert Willow while Date Palms line the interior east side of the project. Shrubs proposed within the project include Dwarf Myrtle, Texas Ranger, Red Bird of Paradise, Texas Olive, and Bougainvillea -cl 016 A:\LARC SDP 2001-719.wpd FINDINGS: The Committee is required to comment on the following findings: Architectural Design - The architectural design of the project, including but not limited o the architectural style, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements are compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The project is consistent with the Architectural Guidelines in the Puerta Azul Specific Plan 2001-056 including building massing and scale, architectural features and details, and roof treatment for prototype resort villas. Landscape Design - Project landscaping, including but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials has been designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, and complement the surrounding project area, ensuring lower maintenance and water use. The proposed landscaping plan includes adequate landscaping treatment along the perimeter of the Great House and resort villas, the parking areas, and Madison Street. The palette of plant material is compatible with the proposed design and consistent with the Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of the architectural style for Site Development Permit 2001-719 as submitted. Attachments: 1 . Landscape Plans and Building Elevations Prepared by: Submitted by: ---- Fred Baker, AICP Principal Planner Christine di lorio Planning Manager AAARC SDP 2001-719.wpd B 1 #C ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2001 CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-718 APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: SEDONA HOMES, INC. REQUEST: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THREE NEW PROTOTYPE RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH THREE FACADES EACH LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EISENHOWER DRIVE AND AVENUE 50 IN TRACT 30125 ARCHITECT: PEKAREK-CRANDELL, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: FORREST K. HAAG, ASLA, INC. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map 30125 was approved by the City Council on June 19, 2001 by Resolution 2001-87. Amendment No. 1 of Tentative Tract Map 30125 was approved by the City Council on September 18, 2001 by Resolution 2001-115. Site Development Permit 2001-703 for prototypical houses was reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee on May 8, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended approval on May 22, 2001 per Resolution 2001-084, and was approved by the City Council on June 19, 2001 per Resolution 2001-86. The approval of this current application would superc:ede the previous approval. PROJECT REQUEST: The applicant proposes three prototype single family residential unit plans for a 66-lot subdivision on approximately 28 acres located at the southeast corner or Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50. The proposed floor plans vary from 2,236 square feet to 2,629 square feet of livable space on lots generally measuring 50+ feet wide by 125+ feet long. Proposed architectural design themes are California -Mediterranean, relying heavily on stuccoed exterior surfaces and concrete S-tile roofing. Each plan type has three facade design treatments that include variation in window sizes and shapes, decorative wood elements, October 31, 2001 Page 1 .1jo. 018 and other distinct but unifying features such as either exposed rafter tails, stucco fascias, wood shutters, decorative vents and eave ends, etc. Gable roofs (4:12 pitch), in varied heights up to 22 feet high, include enhanced tower features over front door entrances highlighted by 12-inch and deeper eave overhangs. Building color schemes are primarily variations of white and brown plaster with dark: accent colors in shades of green, blue, and brown. An exterior material and color sample board will be available at the meeting. A front yard production landscaping plan has been submitted consisting of two street trees per lot accented by vines and a variety of shrubs. Trees used for the project are Bottle Tree, Chilean Mesquite, and Olive. Plant materials are appropriate for this climate. FINDINGS: Findings necessary to approve this request can be made, with the implementation of Conditions of Approval, as follows: Architectural Design. The Zoning Code (Section 9.60.330) design guidelines require a minimum of two different front elevations, varied roof heights, and window and door surrounds for flat elevation planes. The proposed units comply with these requirements in that three facades per plan are proposed, roof heights are varied with the combination of different roof designs, and plaster surrounds are provided where required. The applicant's plans, including architectural themes, are in compliance with City design requirements. Landscape Design. The plans provide design and planting information for the front yards that comply with City Zoning Code requirements. The plant pallette is varied and blends with the proposed houses and is compatible with the surrounding area. Final review by staff for these plans is recommended in Condition 1. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 2001-718, subject to the following conditions: Prior to issuance of building permits for any of the units authorized by this approval, final working drawings shall be approved by the Community Development Department including the following: A. Final front yard landscaping plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department after receiving approval from the Coachella Valley Water District and Riverside County Agricultural Commission. October 31, 2001 Page 2 _r 01 Landscaping plans shall indicate tree sizes of at least 24 inch box and shrubs of at least 5 gallons in size. Attachments: Tract Map (Phase 1) Tract Map (Phase 2) Floor Plans/Elevations Prepared by: Michele Rambo, Associate Planner October 31, 2001 Page 3 Submitted by: Christine di lorio, rlanning Manager 020 BI #D ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: ARCHITECT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: NOVEMBER 7, 2001 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-717 KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION KSL HOTEL LAND DAVID NEAULT ASSOCIATES, INC. REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A MERCHANT BUILDER WELCOME CENTER IN PGA WEST SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PGA BOULEVARD AND AVENUE 54, AT THE ENTRANCE TO PGA WEST Specific Plan 83-002 Amendment No. 4 was approved by the La Quinta City Council on October 3, 2000 by Resolution 00-130. This Amendment approved a change from Zoning and General Plan designations of Community Commercial to Medium Density Residential. The applicant is proposing a new merchant builder welcome center to house the sales offices of builders within PGA West. The proposed 48' X 50', 2400 square foot modular building will consist of a flat roof with stucco plaster walls. The elevations feature a combination of single -pane and multi -pane windows and doors. A decorative light fixture is proposed for the front elevation as well as a decorative entry with a pitched tile gable roof supported by wood posts with concrete bases. The conceptual landscaping plan for the site proposes landscaping on only the north and west elevations. This plan consists of a wide variety of trees and shrubs, including Queen Palms, Fan Palms, Date Palms, Mesquite, Day Lily, Hibiscus, Bird of Paradise, and Oleander among others. Date Palms are proposed to line the front walkway of the building to provide for an appealing entrance statement. Included on this plan are fences surrounding the property. One is proposed to be a painted wood fence along the rear property line, while the others are proposed as chainlink with screening material along the side property lines. November 1, 2001 Page 1 1.&r, 021 Findings necessary to approve this request can be made, with the implementation of Conditions of Approval, as follows: Architectural Design As designed and conditioned, the proposed building architecture does conform to the architecture of the existing residences located in the vicinity. The proposed design, scale, and place will lend itself to the surrounding environment by providing for an attractive streetscape and entry statement into PGA West. The window and door openings are proportionate to the building and allow maximum light, and the combination of single -pane and multi -pane windows and doors lend visual interest. The building has been designed with appropriate architectural variation and detailing to break up the elevations with the windows, light fixture, and entryway. 2. Landscape Design The proposed project includes a variety of landscaping which is sufficient to soften the appearance of the building and provide visual interest. However, the use of chainlink fencing along the side property lines is inconsistent with the landscape design found in the immediately surrounding area. Therefore, staff recommends in Condition No. 1 that the chainlink be replaced with a more permanent and visually attractive material such as steel pickets or wrought iron. The proposed use of Date Palms along the front walkway is not encouraged due to potential problems given the health of and age of the trees when planted. Staff recommends in Condition No. 2 that these proposed Date Palms be replaced by a different species of palm tree. The Date Palms located along the property lines are acceptable as proposed. Although landscaping is proposed for the north and west elevations of the building, the south and east elevations are left unlandscaped. Due to the curvature of PGA Boulevard, the south elevation of the proposed building will also be visible from the street. Therefore, staff recommends in Condition No. 3 that landscaping be included on the south elevation of the building. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 2001-717, subject to the following conditions: Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plan shall be redrawn to indicate that the fencing along the side property lines be changed from chainlink with screening to a more permanent and visually attractive material to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. November 1, 2001 Page 2 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plan shall be redrawn to indicate that the proposed Date Palms along the front walkway be replaced with a different species of palm tree. Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plan shall be redrawn to indicate landscaping along the south elevation of the building to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. Attachments: Plans Exhibit (Includes site/landscape plans and elevations.) Prepared by: Michele Rambo, Associate Planner November 1, 2001 Page 3 Submitted by: r Christine di lorio, Planning Manager 023 BI #E ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: ARCHITECT: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NOVEMBER 7, 2001 VILLAGE USE PERMIT 2001-013 LA QUINTA GRILL STEWART WOODARD, AIA RON GREGORY, ASLA REQUEST: REVIEW OF LANDSCAPING AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR THREE OFFICE BUILDINGS ON AN EXISTING RESTAURANT SITE LOCATION: ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES BACKGROUND: EAST SIDE OF AVENIDA BERMUDAS, BETWEEN CALLE CADIZ AND CALLE BARCELONA. VILLAGE COMMERCIAL NORTH: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: RESTAURANT EAST: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WEST: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The La Quinta Grill has been in operation as a restaurant for several years in what was originally a single family residence. The existing restaurant is 9,938 square feet. The Grill occurs on the north half of the lot, with access from Calle Cadiz. The south and east sides of the lot are occupied by an existing un-striped and sub -standard parking area which accommodates approximately 50 cars, and landscaping. REQUEST: The Village Use Permit is being requested to allow the construction of three office structures, two of which will be two story and one one story. The two story structures will be the eastern most, and will be further set back from Avenida Bermudas. Altogether, the three buildings will provide 8,235 square feet of office space:. GAWPDOCS\ARLC\LQGriIIStfRpt.WPD �p/ 024 The buildings are proposed to be architecturally compatible with the design existing La Quinta Grill building. Both are representative of the California Ranch architectural style. The proposed building roofs will covered in gray concrete shingles. Exterior walls will be clad with white painted wood board and batten finish. A balcony will occur on all sides of buildings 2 and 3, with a connecting span at the center of the buildings. Balcony construction is also proposed to be wood, with wood railings and pickets. Multi -paned metal trimmed windows and french doors will be provided throughout. Landscaping for the project focuses on drought tolerant plantings, and proposes to preserve a number of the existing trees on the site. The new plantings will reflect those already in place, and focus on palms and olives as primary trees for the site. Patio areas are enhanced with brick banding, and walkways are surrounded by planter areas. FINDINGS: The Committee is required to comment on the following findings: Architectural Design - The architectural design of the project, including but not limited o the architectural style, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements are compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. The proposed buildings have been designed to complement the existing restaurant, and maintain the architectural character of the site. The board and batten and wooden balconies are consistent with the older structures of the Village, and a welcome relief from the stucco typically used in modern structures. The deep overhangs provided by the pitched roof will enhance the energy efficiency of the structures. The architectural style of the buildings, combined with the heavily shaded site, will create a pleasant and welcoming working environment. Landscape Design - Project landscaping, including but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials has been designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, and complement the surrounding project area, ensuring lower maintenance and water use. A broad mix of plant types is proposed, which will create visual interest on the property. Landscaping has not been provided for the parking lot area, but only for the new buildings. A condition of approval has been added which requires consistent landscaping in the parking lot, and that the plan be prepared for Planning Commission review. 025 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\LQG rill SORpt. WPD In conclusion, the findings needed to recommend approval of this request can be made, with the modifications discussed above. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of the architectural style and landscaping plan for Village Use Permit 2001-013, subject to the following conditions: 1. The landscaping plan for the parking lot shall be consistent with that provided for the new office building area, and shall be submitted prior to Planning Commission hearing on this Village Use Permit. Attachments: 1 . Site Plan 2. Landscape Plan 3. Building Elevations Prepared by: Submitted by: JolV1,Ne Sauviatl ri to Christine di lorio, Planning Manager Planning Cons Itan ,/. 026 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\LQGrd1Stf Rpt. WPD BI #F ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: NOVEMBER 7. 2001 SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT HERMAN & ASSOCIATES REQUEST: REVIEW OF LANDSCAPING AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER CONSISTING OF A SUPERMARKET AND MULTIPLE ANCILLARY BUILDINGS. LOCATION: SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: BACKGROUND: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL NORTH: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND GOLF: COURSE SOUTH: VACANT, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EAST: VACANT, COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT WEST: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND GOLF COURSE The project site is located at the southeast corner of Jefferson and Avenue 52. The proposal includes a Specific Plan, Site Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit. The shopping center proposed for the site would include a supermarket, drug store, gas station and seven ancillary buildings. REQUEST: The Site Development Permit for this project requests approval for the architectural style and landscaping plan for the project. No elevations have been provided for the gas station site, or pads A, B, C, D, E or F. These buildings will require separate review under separate Site Development Permits. G.\WPDOCS\ARLC\PuebloStfRpt.WPD .A - 27 The architectural style of the proposed project is generally "Southwestern". The buildings are proposed to be stucco, with flat roofs and large pillars supporting a shaded walkway area. Exposed wood beams are proposed under each archway. No other articulation or adornment is proposed. Landscaping for the project utilizes drought tolerant plantings, relying on mesquite trees to provide shade in parking areas. Berming is proposed in the text, but not demonstrated on the plans. The retention basin at the northeastern corner of the site is proposed to be landscaped on its perimeter only, with the slopes and bottom to remain in vacant desert. FINDINGS: The Committee is required to comment on the following findings: Architectural Design The architectural design of the project, including but not limited o the architectural style, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements are compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The buildings' architecture is typical of the southwestern style, with flat roofs and heavy stucco pillars. The style has not been significantly enhanced or detailed, which is recommended. The addition of wrought iron lighting fixtures on the pillars throughout the project, and of raised medallions or similar features would improve the building style. Conditions of Approval have been included below. The elevations for the drug store site propose a much less substantial structure and level of detail than the supermarket site. The covered walkway areas have been eliminated, and the pillars considerably reduced. It is recommended that all buildings on the site, particularly the drug store site as the second largest anchor, be designed to provide the same substantial structure as the supermarket building. A condition of approval has been added. Also related to the drug store site is both the location of the entrance:, and the inconsistencies in elevations. The site plan shows a corner entrance, which is typical of a Walgreens or Rite -Aide standard building. The architectural style that has been chosen for the center, however, relies on symmetrical design, with central access points. It is recommended that the entrance to the building be located in the center of the western elevation, and that the same symmetrical design as has been applied to the supermarket building be applied to this one. A condition of approval has been added. Landscape Design -Project landscaping, including but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials has been designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, and complement the surrounding project area, ensuring lower maintenance and water use. �28 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\PuebloStfRpt. W PD The landscape plan is limited to Palo Verde, Mesquite and Acacia for trees, and a mix of drought tolerant shrubs and succulents for ground cover. Little turf appears to be proposed. The primary area of concern in the landscaping plan is the retention area, which the Specific Plan proposes to landscape only on the perimeter, leaving the slopes and bottom in vacant desert. The Specific Plan further states that the retention basin will be used as a nursery. Neither of these options is recommended. First, the site occurs in a high wind area, and must be stabilized. Second, retention basins cannot be filled with plants which will reduce or eliminate the water storage capacity for which they are designed. A condition of approval has therefore been added which requires the redesign of the retention basin landscaping, to include some type of soil stabilization and to prohibit its use as a plant nursery. In conclusion, the findings needed to recommend approval of this request can be made, with the modifications discussed above. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of the architectural style and landscaping plan for Village Use Permit 2001-012, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Proposed buildings for the gas station site, or pads A, B, C, D, E or F shall be required to submit separate Site Development Permits. 2. The architectural plans shall be amended to reflect the addition of wrought iron wall mounted lighting fixtures on the pillars of all buildings, in the southwestern style. 3. Raised medallions shall be added as focal points to all buildings' architecture, to provide some relief and interest to the structures. 4. All buildings on the site, and particularly the drug store building, shall be designed to include the covered walkways and heavy pillars proposed for the supermarket building. The design of the entire site shall demonstrate a consistent level of architectural detailing. 5. The entry of the drug store building shall be located in the center of the western elevation, and a symmetrical facade shall be designed on either side of the entrance, consistent with the supermarket building design. 6. The retention basin landscaping shall be redesigned to include landscaping on the slopes and bottom of sufficient size and density to stabilize soils. 7. Plant storage or "nursery" shall be prohibited in the retention basin. G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\Pueb1oSif Rpt. W PD 029 Attachments: Development Package Prepared 11 Submitted by: Nicole auvi Cr ste Chri tine di lorio, PI nning Manager Planning Consultant . 03 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\PuebIoSIf Rpt. W PD 0