2001 12 05 ALRCb OF TNT
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the
La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
December 5, 2001
10:00 A.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2001-051
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for
public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your
comments to three minutes.
III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of the Minutes for November 7, 2001.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-719
Applicant ................ Puerta Azul Holdings
Location .................. 57-325 Madison Street (north of Avenue 58)
Request .................. Review of building elevations for a two story
5,274 square foot Great House (clubhouse)
Action .................... Minute Motion 2001-
ALRC/AGENDA �'.'lU 001
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
B. Item ....................... CAPITAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2001-011
Applicant ................ Robert Capetz
Location ................. 51-370 Avenida Bermudas, Plaza de la Fuente,
two story commercial building
Request .................. Funding request for painting, new patio cover,
tile work, landscaping, exterior lighting, and
parking lot wall.
Action .................... Minute Motion 2001-
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
ALRC/AGENDA i 002
02
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
November 7, 2001
RITATMIlexel l m
10:00 a.m.
A. This meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
was called to order at 10:03 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di lorio,
who led the flag salute.
B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, and David Thorns. Committee
Member Dennis Cunningham arrived at 10:19.
C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan
Sawa, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Associate Planner Michele
Rambo, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Planning Manager Christine di lorio asked if there were any changes to
the Minutes of October 3, 2001. There being no corrections, it was
moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to
approve the minutes as submitted, with Committee Member Thorns
abstaining.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Site Development Permit 2001-720; a request of Rancho Capistrano
Development Corporation for review of architectural and landscaping
plans for a new casitas prototype residential plan located north of
Avenue 54 and east of Jefferson Street within Country Club, of the
Desert
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\Mint 1-7-01.wpd 1 '�'i,J �� 003
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 7.2001
2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there would be any
architectural detail on the right elevation. Mr. Robert Wilkinson,
representing Rancho Capistrano, stated there is no detail as there
is no exposure on that side. Staff stated there is a stucco popout
on the top of each window.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if this was the elevation that
would face the adjoining unit. Mr. Wilkinson stated that was
correct.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the Date Palm Trees would be
used in areas of low traffic in case there would be crown drop.
He also stated trees need to have more space or they can cause
problems later on. He would like to see the trees far enough away
from hardscape so potential cracking of hard surfaces is
minimized.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the Bottle trees were messy
and a different variety should be used.
6. Committee Member Thoms asked about plant material for the
trellis as there needed to be some type of material that would
grow on the columns/trellis.
7. Committee Member Cunningham stated architecturally it fits with
the site and he agrees with staff's recommendation.
8. Committee Member Thoms recommended using a two piece tile
that would look better. It is not mortared or clay but rather an
upgrade to give a better appearance.
9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute: Motion
2001-045 recommending approval of Site Development: Permit
2001-720, subject to the conditions as revised:
A. Condition #3: Trees shall be planted a minirnum of
four feet from hardscape or buildings.
B. Condition #4: The Bottle tree shall be replaced with a
different variety of tree.
Unanimously approved.
G:\WPDOCS\ARLCMin l 1-7-Ol.wpd 2 004
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 7, 2001
C. Site Development Permit 2001-719; a request of Puerta Azul Holdings
for review of building elevations and landscaping plans for four prototype
resort villa units with two facades each located at 57-325 Madison.
1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked staff to identify the location.
Staff stated it is the old sculpture park and this project was
approved last year. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the
small unit and was it within the allowed requirements. Staff stated
it is a resort use and under the Specific Plan it is allowed. They
will not be time share or factional units.
3. Mr. Steve McCormick, RNM Architect Planners for the project,
gave a presentation on the project and handed out a new
rendering of the project.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated it was a fresh approach
with the use of clustering and curbing streets creating a village
atmosphere. Staff explained the tract map has been approved.
5. Committee Member Thorns asked if the garage doors were
constructed of wood. Mr. McCormick stated they would be roll up
doors but made of a wood material. Committee Member Thorns
asked how this project is monitored to keep it from becoming a
residential community. Staff stated it is monitored under the
Specific Plan and Code Compliance. It is governed by the
CC&R's.
6. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern over the lack of
parking and asked for a definition of the "Great House" Mr.
McCormick stated it is a clubhouse and the plans were being
revised and would be submitted at a later date to the ALRC.
Committee Member Bobbitt asked where the retention basins
would be located. Staff explained.
7. Committee Member Thorns stated it was a nice project.
8. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the partial two story was
within the height limits. Staff stated it was and Mr. McCormick
stated there would be about a quarter of the number built.
G:AWPDOCS\ARLCAMinl 1-7-Ol.wpd 3 `�J �� 005
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 7, 2001
9. Committee Member Cunningham stated they should look at a
wood composite material for the roll -up doors.
10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion
2001-046 recommending approval of Site Development Permit
2001-720, subject to the conditions as recommended.
C. Site Development Permit 2001-718; a request of Sedona Homes for
review of architectural and landscaping plans for three new prototype
residential units with three facades each located at the southeast corner
of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50.
1. Associate Planner Michele Rambo presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file: in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like
to address the Committee. Mr. Lance Alacano, representing
Sedona Homes, gave a presentation on the project.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the material to be used
on the gates and suggested metal be used on both gates. Mr.
Alacano stated they had decided to use metal on all gates.
4. Committee Member Thorns stated he is not a favor of this type of
architecture and asked if they would be using clay roofs. Mr.
Alacano stated it was the smooth stucco with clay tile roofs.
5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to adopt Minute Motion
2001-047 recommending approval of Site Development Permit
2001-719, as amended.
A. Side yard gates shall be wrought iron.
D. Site Development Permit 2001-717; a request of KSL Development
Corporation for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a
merchant builder welcome center in PGA West to be located at the
southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 54
1. Associate Planner Michele Rambo presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on fill: in the
Community Development Department.
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\Minl 1-7-Ol.wpd 4 006
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 7, 2001
2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant had any
comments. Mr. Bill Dodds, representing KSL Development
Corporation, gave a presentation on the project. He agreed with
staff's recommendation but was looking at a plaster or other
material for the wall that would be removable.
3. Committee Member Cunningham asked if this was temporary and
how long it would be there. Mr. Dodds stated two years and have
support from two HOA's.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if vines or some other plant
material would be used on the south side of the building. Mr.
Dodds explained what was proposed.
5. Committee Member Cunningham stated that with a temporary
building it is hard to dress it up architecturally. As proposed it
should work, but he is hesitant because of the temporary use.
6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the trees at the old
location. Mr. Dodds stated some of the trees would be relocated
to this site. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his only objection
is that the building looks like a box and the more you can hide it
with landscaping the better it will be.
7. Committee Member Thorns asked why the Date Palms were not
proposed at the entrance. Committee Member Bobbitt stated this
has been a concern of his because of the potential for a crown to
drop if the older palms are used. Committee Thorns stated the
Washingtonia Robusta does not carry the strength needed at the
entrance and suggested using a Phoenix Dactifilera of a decent
size.
8. Committee Member Thorns stated he does not like to see a box
without a roof on it and suggested a hip roof be used for the
building.
9. Committee Member Cunningham stated it is a temporary modular
which should be considered. The applicant could spend rnore on
the landscaping and remove the attraction from the building.
Discussion followed regarding the look of the building and
landscaping alternatives to dress it up.
G:\WYDOCS\ARLC\Minll-7-Ol.wpd 5 t�,'J.�',, 007
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 7, 2001
10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to adopt Minute Motion
2001-048 recommending approval of Site Development Permit
2001-717, as revised.
A. Condition #2: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the
landscape plan shall indicate that the proposed Date; Palms
shall be inspected by a landscape architect to assure
suitability of the area and the trees shall be of the same size
and height.
E. Village Use Permit 2001-013; a request of La Quinta Grill for review of
architectural and landscaping plans for three office buildings on an
existing restaurant site to be located on the east side of Avenida
Bermudas between Calle Cadiz and Calle Barcelona.
1. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file: in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like
to address the Commission. Mr. Steward Woodward gave a
presentation on the project.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he liked the project and asked
about the Olive Tree as to whether it was new and asked that it
be fruitless variety.
4. Committee Member Thorns stated he also concurred with the
design comments. His concern was the design of the parking lot
he would like to see a material other than plant material that could
be walked on in the planters. At the island end the planter shall
be no more than 15 feet in length.
5. Committee Member Cunningham stated he also liked the project.
6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion
2001-049 recommending approval of Village Use Permit 2001-013
as amended:
a. Condition #2
Use Olen Europaea
(fruitless) tree. Use
Springs Gold that ca
Parking lot planter.
"Wilson Olive"
rock or Palm
n be within the
G:\WPDOCS\A ,C\Minl1-7-01.wpd 6
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 7, 2001
b. Condition #3: Landscape planters at the end stalls
shall be no more than 15 feet in length.
F. Site Development Permit 2001-71 1; a request of RLF Development for
review of architectural and landscaping plans for a neighborhood
commercial shopping center consisting of a supermarket and multiple
ancillary buildings located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and
Jefferson Street.
1. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file: in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like
to address the Committee. Mr. Tim Bartlett, representing the
applicant, gave a presentation on the project. He corrected the
staff report in that the material on the archway would be a racked
stucco.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he liked the raked look and
asked if it would be a different color. Mr. Bartlett stated yes to
give it a wood look. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the
distance between the columns and the store front. Mr. Bartlett
stated 12 to 16 feet. They agree with the wrought iron detail as
requested by staff. In regard to the drug store, there have an
issue the store entry design as requested by staff. They would
suggest squaring off the entry.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked staff what their objection was.
Staff explained the center is a symmetrical design which does not
lend itself to this design. Therefore, staff did not think this would
blend in with the rest of the arcade.
5. Committee Member Cunningham stated there may be some issues
on the overall architecture but he would not concentrate on one
site. He believes that architecture done well works, therefore, he
does not have a set standard for architecture he prefers for the
City. This project is clean, contemporary and nothing should be
added to it.
6. Committee Member Thorns stated he agreed that it should be kept
simple. He would however, like to see the drugstore redesigned.
G:AWPDOCS\ARLCVMinl 1-7-01.wpd 7 001
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 7, 2001
7. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what the homes on the east
and south would see. He agrees it does not need any architectural
details added. In regard to the drugstore, it does need something,
but you have to be careful not to interfere with the drive through
and parking.
8. Mr. Dick Franz, developer of the site, asked if they could redesign
the drugstore and bring it back. Discussion followed regarding
design alternatives.
9. Committee Member Thorns asked that the island ends also be
reduced to 15 feet.
10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/ Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion
2001-050 recommending approval of Site Development Permit
2001-71 1, as revised:
A. Conditions #2, #3 and #5: deleted.
B. Condition #5: The entry of the drug store building shall be
squared on the corner and consistent with the supermarket
building design.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS:
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architecture and
Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on December 5, 2001.
This meeting was adjourned at 11:52 a.m. on November 7, 2001.
Respectfully submitted,
BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
.) 010
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\Min 1 I -7-0 l.wpd 8
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO.
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
SURROUNDING
ZONING/LAND USE:
BACKGROUND:
DECEMBER 5, 2001
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-719
BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR A TWO STORY 5,274
SQUARE FOOT GREAT HOUSE (CLUBHOUSE)
57325 MADISON STREET (MADISON, NORTH OF
AVENUE 58)
PUERTA AZUL HOLDINGS
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RMH)
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)
NORTH:
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
SOUTH:
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
EAST:
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (13L)
WEST:
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
The currently vacant project site, located on Madison Street, north of Avenue 58,
consists of one parcel totaling 19.64 acre. The project site is within Pueirta Azul
Specific Plan 2001-0053, adopted by City Council on May 15, 2001, which
establishes guidelines and standards in a focused development plan for the
distribution of land uses, location and sizing of supporting infrastructure, development
standards, and requirements for public improvements. The Design Guidelines portion
of the Plan provides design criteria which includes Architectural Guidelines utilizing
a contemporary interpretation of Colonial Spanish and California Mission style
architecture; and Landscape Guidelines that complement and accent the project with
perimeter landscaping along Madison Street.
A Sculpture Park was approved by the City in 1993 on the relatively flat site.
Improvements remaining since the closure of the facility include: a single family house
and another building, a swimming pool, a lake, an interior concrete driveway and
walkway, remnant sculpture pieces, and an entry gate.
A:\LARC SDP 2001-719 Great House.wpd Oil
w7syrovano..
Proposed is a two story 5,274 square foot facility a "Great House" which includes a
first story public area providing a reception area, kitchen, library, office, exercise
room, and great hall, and second story one bedroom manager's apartment.
The Colonial Spanish genre structure is rectangular in shape and uses an
interconnecting hip roof with parapet roofs at the entry with heights ranging from 17
to 22 foot (with a 6' 1 1 " bell tower for a total of 28' 1 1 "' on the center of the
structure) The roof is covered with concrete "S" style red tile. Walls are "Coconut
Colada" colored stucco with a grey decorative cornice. Parking for the manager's unit
is proposed to have a roll -up garage door with light brown wood. An arcade with
stucco columns is proposed along the facade. Under the arcade, multi -pane windows
are recessed and trimmed with the accent grey stucco surrounds; windows outside
the arcade are proposed to have decorative black wrought iron grille work.
The Landscaping Plan for this project was reviewed and recommended for approval
to the Planning Commission on November 7, 2001.
The Committee is required to comment on the following findings:
Architectural Design - The architectural design of the project, including but not limited
o the architectural style, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof
style, and other architectural elements are compatible with the surrounding
development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city.
The project is consistent with the Architectural Guidelines in the Puerta Azul Specific
Plan 2001-056 including building massing and scale, architectural features and
details, and roof treatment for the Great House.
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of the architectural style for Site
Development Permit 2001-719 as submitted.
Attachments:
1. Building Elevations
Prepared by:
Fred Baker, AICP
Principal Planner
A:\LARC SDP 2001-719 Great House.wpd
Submitted by:
ristint di lorio
nning Manager 012
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2001
CASE NO.: 2001-01 1
APPLICANT: ROBERT CAPETZ
REQUEST: FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR PAINTING, NEW PATIO COVER, TILE WORK,
LANDSCAPING, EXTERIOR LIGHTING, AND PARKING LOT WALL
LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF AVENIDA BERMUDAS, PLAZA DE LA FUENTE-
TWO STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING ACROSS FROM POST
OFFICE (51-370 AVENIDA BERMUDAS)
The property owner, Robert Capetz, has submitted an application under the
Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking funding for exterior
painting; construction of a patio cover over suite #2 which fronts Calle Cadiz (to
provide shade and heat control); the removal and replacement of damaged tile in the
fountain, suite #2 doorway, and at the sitting area; landscaping improvements with
walkway lighting and illumination of several trees; and the construction of a 24 foot
long by five foot high block wall along Avenida Bermudas at the alley to block the view
of parked cars from the street. (Attachment 1).
Mr. Capetz is a licensed contractor, and has submitted a bid to coordinate the
construction of the improvements. The bids are as follows:
1 . Robert Capetz - $17,399.08
2. A.M. Construction - $19,139
3. R. A. Wasserman Construction - $ 20,008.94
The actual details of the financing, subject to the program limitations, will be
negotiated through the rebate agreement entered into by and between the La Quinta
Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and the applicant.
As with other applications, a Funding Criteria worksheet is attached to this staff report
(Attachment 2) to facilitate scoring of the project.
If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City
departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After receiving
•'.'1u 013
all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into a rebate agreement with the
applicant.
The applicant's representative has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated
that he will be present at the December 5, 2001 ALRC meeting.
Prepared by:
I
Debbie Powell, Management Analyst
City Manager's Office
Attachments:
1 . CPIP application: Plaza de la Fuente
2. Funding Criteria worksheet
Submitted by:
hris ine di-lorio, Planning Manager
om unity Development Department
G:\Britt's Files\MyData\WPDocs\CPIP\Plaza de la Fuente-Capetz\ALRC Staff Report.wpd
ATTACHMENT 1
La Ouinta RetievelopmentAgency
PROGRAM STEPS (CONT.)
Commercial Propertylmprovement•ProgramAapli adon
be based on the lowest bid amotim(s). The applicant
FscalYear ?001-2002
may c base any licensed contractor, but the tuntlittg
award vviB'be based an the iowesi`bid.
6.
if aoplicatlfe, cur anctiftedr or design. professional will
Applicant information
prepare �wC stm draw ngs
7ail
..apvy�t Namx & 7 VI.51& . ! 690r
7.
The applicant wtU obtain: three' (3�,C contractor bids. All
Apptcant Phorhx 7 All, Apptsam.E tfak
-orUa = must ce i csised by tine Slate and have a
�
Name of BUNN= O G� c�e iZ
business license with. the; Cif. of La Ouinta Bids need
` •D. //h�h!f L.�c- /i�/1 �1L
only be obtained up to' fheiProgramilimfts (l.e,.$15,000).
Mating Address: .COX
For example: if the improvemenVconstniClon casts are
9uskhessPhahe: /GD•79/• h/�oTe2:'• 9usurers,rsic'77/-h/f�1�
$100,000, the spotc' A does• not need to get. three (3)
.. .,
'•PropenyCwnar. Yet NM -..
bids for every cgmponeor or' Tor, the total:amount.
-'
Yes him
However, d the appliiarif Tel seeking' $15,000, then three
: Business owner: _
(3) bids roust be obtained totaling at least $16.500
M PrOjOd Information
($15,000 plus. 1e. match of $1,500) for that component
Business Location: wf/•
being funded by the PT.grann.
,
6.
The aoplicard will submit the construction axis and o oaf
Type of Bnsinesx G!B✓P� �D�"
Project Gone: r`XAe r/Dr' //77 iar'o
of contractor insuranr~ to Agency staff..
9.
The Agency and applicant unit sign a Building
%2 q ..
improvement Rebate, Agneanent (Rebate Agreement)
outtlning the work, to, be, oompteted.. I NO worli shall
commence (other '.han the moral design activities), until
Total Pmlw Can (please ataGh cost'esmnate):'
the applicant: submits an executed` Rebate .agreement
Requested agency AssstariM l�i�dD Appttcartt.RtatCi} 7
and the applicant obtains all applicable hulloing: permits.
Description of Applicant Funding Soccer
10.
The applicant or the con#--=, will obtain -aft applicable
--
building perni ts.
Proposed Pmject our eorr. A L/Jee/'� 5
11.
The applicant is responsible.for; pmW. implementation.
Consoucion. must.. start within, ninety:. (90). days from
Attachments
obtaining building oemktsand be completed within one
• Two (2) mlor photographs of the property vmere improvemens'Witte Insraied.
(1) Year after the execution od.the Rebate Agreement
.Project sketafes at. Diets (liasetl upon fundlg 1eveQ
1Z.
The loan may be iinded in. three equal payments at the
Cast es vnaim
applicant's request payment of 33% of. the total amount
Certification Statements
will be made when construid0 h. Commetxes., Second
pavment of 33% of the total amount will Occur when the
it the applicant is not the owner M the. subject popem the Vlovom caratication must be
project. is 50%. comWete (Ihe Rebate. Agreement will
completed by the Mostivowner. ... -
describe. this milestone). i hethird paymenifwill be made
; 1. eciare under penalty; and, pnrW% that. 1;am Me owner Of
upon. project completion and verification, .4 the. items
:_. property imoived in this applirafion..I acttraMedgs that: only; one (1} tenant of as subject
- foal ;
presented -in 313 and. rtld.. below. If the applicant does
;. pmpeny, imrorved in ns pplicafi n m e awarded.Pmgram fundbg n any me (1)given
not. choose. the -.three. Nuaipayment,. plan;. the., payment
;..yam:
•..
will be. made upon project completion and, verification. of
;. Sgnature
theiiemspmsentedinal3'and,rl4:befow>,.
1 _..
..
The iollowg statement completed by the applcant and prupenyawnee .
13.
Upon completion, the applicant must submit photos of the
;,-. twe acnowfedge the Tiling of this application and calmly that all above information is true and
-
finished, project' and:. proof.' ore: vendor:; payment'. and
;. - fate to the best of mylour knowledge and ballet. thim understand t at aull rg.,1'mprohareew ;
conttacor lien releases.. Agency- staff" will themvisti, the
::: Rebate Agreement must be signed and: authorized W The La Own, RedevelopnenE Agency
shei to, _slit)+ proles: =notation; within: (15y days, aftert
aot to mmmentlng am work on thispmpct
receiving Mass natenatsfrom Meapplicant
�'Slgnatoa _ _ Oats .
14.
The• applicant wiR,receive: thatfihat..progress; PilYm At
slgnawm Dare
upon verification of project, 'pm015160 c, -1 his' w il` a() c
within. fdlean (15) days' after the site -visit atdcertihcation
of. vendor. payments, and construction :lien.teteassm For
1
new construction, Snal'; progress,, paYfrtents, wilt: runt. be
Please return the completed application; with required'a=chmerftsy tlx
made unfit aGartmcateof Occipancy'Hat .been. issued by,.
the C'dy and the business is open ho the'public.
City of La Quints RedevefopmentAgency,
c/o Mana•Casfllas.
is.
Successuisapolxaits.musfcunply,•wddlag:mcof:Slate
7&495Calls Tampico
and iederaf:'aw5,; indUg)fig oayment'or.'ary prevailing
La-OUinta. C7F9Z53
wages as applicable-ana'required bylaw
,..01 015
E ej PO BOX 7 144 LA OUIN7A CA 92253-1 144
un Vista
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
November 19, 2001
Ms. Maria Casillas
CITY OF LA QUINTA
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
Re: Commercial Property Improvement Program
51-370 Avenida Bermudas
Dear Maria,
(760) 772-2626 FAX (760) 772-2302
Enclosed please find our completed application for the CPI Program. We are requesting funds
to implement enhancements to the building which are shown on the attached plans and
specifications, and are listed below.
Paint the building #610 Taupe color.
2. Provide additional landscaping.
3. Provide additional landscape lighting.
4. Add a block wall along Avenida Bermudas at the alley way to shield the parked cats.
5. Add trellis at Suite 2 along Calle Cadiz.
6. Replace tile on fountain located on the front of the building.
Three cost estimates are included in this package for your review. If you need any additional
information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you.
Mark Rason
Superintendent
.Ub 016
�p
-sent
a � � t✓ A.
J
I"
t
� -
ice.. . .
. i•�$ �
Iei�+f—
i.
NN
it
I
c Sr
F
i
�
Iff
I
\ t
m 'a-
` n i -fit
-x h�k•� c ((��x{al t
$lwtj 4~
1 f- ^�`` f � it i�yas� ..,y� •il•. it
W3�
I
Y r -
u' a� i
Ni -w;af I
3
vp Ott
let
Y a R:.• � x�l .tt ��'; I
t .r wd
-
{ t y
r
ly li, iAIIIY"'
Ti
_ PI
iTI
�.
�5i¢L yy r' •it.. � I :�:�.
t�,t I tY t • t , I ,
ff
IT
E,
all
Tom
II
�i I�• r� t i,
+J
I + I
�k
•, y�' :i s
I E
j:
i; �. I w }•.; ?t �, .:"cam. ''t* I' �i
'il ' (t[• .�� _ ��.� irk
Antique Terracotta consente di
personalizzare ogni ambiente grazie a
diversi formati modulari ed a splendidi
decori, arricchiti da una serie di pezzi
speciali the rifiniscono nel dettaglio it
pavimento.
SII ICIUM
Fascia Antiquo Ravenna
19,1x38,2 • ThNIS"
1S e� 3
Bullnose Gradino con Torello
19,1x19,1"T8W7,' 38,2x38,2. 15"x15"
With a range of modular sizes and
beautiful decos enriched by a number
of special pieces and trims,
Antique Terracotta can decorate
any room with customized flair
and detail.
38,2x38,2 • 15"x15"
Torello
7,Ox38,2. Yx15"
Uecoro Bassorilievo 4 Pezzi
19,1x19.1 • TANT/P
Angolare con Torello
38,2x38,2 " IS"x15"
19,1x19,1 •Th"OV?
Angola Estemo
7,Ox6,0 " 3"x2"
Battiscopo
9.,ix38,2 - Th"x15"
022
-, IJ I
023
15
3B T Q (3)
Fi 17E ?J�l[ tFI OLOS
010
C�rSs�
to
-TPA ,�b-s TM 7J,4M»41
, ppopa5e4
?Aexv<,
7-7--53 6IIbKC.LA
—Z �XISTIW, PAI"
wmF Aw pp
51-3'70AL�t r r l ,� c
"P�uer��a
PpD 3 Nav»f rc+ Cou�7t
rte
f—rmc !s
Jim✓+ ,o� c dA .n
I
' z ex�srwt� e�cc.u�piwS 7
' e �. v e • at 0 .� . rl 1 - \» a t a 37®IW®1.Y1[I
W6k I V- "ua.i b q 11+5
00
ou 77.0 IAL-03-NL
FAL-03.5
20 Ft. Dia. Coverage
0e a 4 2 6 2 4 a 6 420}24 e010
Al aR.4
e 420 24e 101210 a426 24a to
10.00
N.
7.25 IAL-03-10"-NL
7— FAL-03-5-10
14 Ft. Dia. Coverage
toe a 42624 a 42 o 24 a s to
�NL":wall, ° a
I08 a 420240 a a e 42024 a 510
6.00
DIAL
85 IAL-04-NL
iFAL-04-5,7,9
24 Ft. Dia. Coverage
1 l0e qe♦ 024 a 010100420 24e e1012
i 100 1 i i 0 2 4 0 .1. 12141 ] 1 o a e 4 2 a 2 4 e a 1012
10.0
49.0 IAL-04-10"-NL
FAL-04-5,7,9.10
20 Ft. Dia. Coverage
lea a 4 7 o24 eee 42024 Belo
. LL 4
%0a 442024 a e101210e a 42024 0a10
Compact Fluorescent Pagodas 120 V
Catalogs: Description
Est. Ship Wt.
FAL-03-5 -
5 watt 3 tier 6" pagoda hat
3.00 tbs.
;FAL-03-5-10"
Same as above with 10" pagoda hat
4.00 lbs.
-FAL.04-5,7,9
5,7 or 9 watt 4 tier 6" pagoda hat
4.00 lbs.
FAL-04.5,7,9-10"
Same as above with 10" pagoda hat
4.00 lbs.
Incandescent ragon' i igy
IAL-03-NL
60 wall may (A,-tg) 3 tier 6" pagoda hat
3.04 ( .
IAL-0340"-NL
Same as ahOYp with 10" pagoda hat
34 ib
FLUORESCENT & INCANDESCENT AREA LIGHTING 120 VOLT
HOUSING: Cast Aluminum 4 LENS: High Impact Clear Tempered Glass
BALLAST: Clamp Core, Type 1 Outdoor, Magnetic for Fluorescent Fixtures. Primary
amp Draw for 120v Fluorescent is not Including Lamp Wattage: 5,7,9w = .165 amp
LAMP SUPPLIED: 5 Watt Warm White (27k) Compact Fluorescent for FAL-03-5
5,7,or 9 Wan (27k) Compact Fluorescent for FAL-04-5,7,9. Select 1. None for the
IAL Series - Design for the A-19 Light Bulb
LAMP OPTIONS: 5,7,or 9 Watt Cool While (41 k) Compact Fluorescent. Specify
one. 4 Other Kelvin Temperatures (Colors) Available. Consult Factory for Price &
Availablility a LAMP BASE: G23,Bi Pin for All Fluorescent Fixtures e Ceramic
Medium Base with Brass Nickle Plated Contacts for IAL Series. 18" Silicon lead
Wires a LAMP LIFE: 10,000+ Hours Average Rating for 5,7,9 Wan Compact
Fluorescents 4 WIRING: Standard 120v, Black,White,Clreen 08 Gauge)
MOUNTING: Standard 120v, junction Box, FA-26 Plastic Pedestal, or FA-39
Pedestal w/ Cord & Plug a FINISH: Black Polyester Powder Coat
FINISH OPTIONS: Antique Verde, Bronze, Hunter, Rust, Verde (Brushed),
Weathered Brown, or White: Add -Color to Catalog p
ACCESSORIES:
FA-22 5" Black Aluminum Rectangular Single Hole Canopy Tapped 1.2" NPS
FA-24 3" Black Aluminum Round Single Hole Canopy Tapped 112" NPS
FA-24-LG 5" Black Aluminum Round Single Hole Canopy Tapped 1/2" NPS
FA-26 21" Black PVC Commercial Mounting Pedestal Tapped 1/2" NPS
FA-30-34 10" - 26" Black Aluminum Extension Wand & Coupler Tapped 1/2" NPS
FA-39 Black PVC Mounting Pedestal 2.5" Dia-Threaded 1/2" NPS w/6 Ft. Cord
& Plug (120v only)
NOTE: To use above accessories you must purchase a nipple of desired height to
join them together
FA-88 5" Frosted Glass Lens for FAL-03 or IAL-03 Series Pagodas
FA-89 7" Frosted Glass Lens for FAL-04 or IAL-04 Series Pagodas
WARNINGM
READ BELOW BEFORE INSTALLING 12 V FLUORESCENT FIXTURES
Important information for all 12 volt fluorescent fixtures including
models FFL-5-12V FFL-7.12V, FFL-9-12V, FFL-13-12VAND FFL-26-
1214, FAL, SL-08-FL, AL-08 and PL-07 series. All fixtures that utilize a
compact fluorescent lamp a112 volts input.
(1) Fixtures must receive a minimum of 10 volts (input) VAC-60 HIZ
or VDC
(2) Cannot be used with electronic power supplies (Magnetic only)
(3) Turn off power when replacing lamps
(4) Install fixtures as close to transformer as passible to reduce volt-
age drop to fixtures. Under 50 ft. is recommended for 12/2, under 75
ft. for 10/2, and under 100 ft. for 8/2. If fixture/s do not come on
instantly, there is not enough start-up current. Move closer to trans-
former, reduce load in front of fixture/s, or isolate with a separate
run of cable. Fixture/s that are blinking will eventually fail.
(5) Lightning, surges, and high voltage will permanently damage fix-
ture.
(6) Use the proper direct burial cable — minimum size 12/2, 10/2,
8/2 recommended.
(7) Follow the following installation guidelines::
12/2 cable — use only (2) fixtures per transformer (1) per line
10/2 cable — use only (4) fixtures per transformer (2) per line
8/2 cable — use only (6) fixtures per transformer (3) per line.
Note: FFL-26-12V has 2 ballasts so use only 1 per line or run.
(8) EFL-5-12V draws 14 Watts FFL-7.12V draws 16 Watts
IAdd edl �`I i 4 W414
�26
8,0
04.51
r 9.4 '11
1
0 4.5
120 V. PAR BULLETS
Catalog: Description Est. Ship Wt.
DL-20-NL
501Na0 PAR-20 Bullet Less Lamp
2.001bs.
DL-20-NL-EC
Same as above w/ Extension Cap & Lem
2.00 lbs.
DL-30-NL
50.75 Wad PAR 30 Bullet less Lamp
2.00 Ibs.
DL-30-NL-EC
Same as above w/ Extension Cap & Lem
2.00 lbs.
DL-38-NL
75-150 Watt PAR 38 w/ Extension Cap & Lem
3.00 lbs.
DL-38.NL-EL:
Same as above w/ Extension Collar
3.00 tbs.
DL-WNL-EC-L
Same as above with Clear Glass Lem & Ring
4.00 lbs.
HOUSING: Cast Aluminum • EXTENSION COLLAR & CAPS: Cast Aluminum.
8.4 For Extension Cap: Add -EC to Catalog: • SWIVEL: Cast Aluminum, Easily
Adjustable • GASKET: Grey Cork Fiber
�455 LAMP SUPPLIED BY OTHERS: Any Par-20 for DL-20-NL Series .Any Par-30 for
DL-30-NL Series . Any Par-38 for DL-38-NL Series.
Note: 50 Watt Max for DL-20-NL Series. 75 Walt Max for DL-30-NL Series. 150
Watt M ( DL 38 NL 5 i • LAMP SOCKET H' h T C : M A:
tl 05.5
TYPE
PAR-20
WATTAGE
35
50
G.E.
8, 10,25
SYLVANIA
8, 30, 40
10,30
PHILIPS
_
9,16, 30
PAR-30
35
9,50
50
8, 25, 35
9, 30, 40
501R
8, 25, 37
SOL
12, 25, 40, 60
9, 30, 50
_
60
10, 30, 40
75
9, 25, 35
9,3040
_
75L
12, 25, 60
9, 30, 50
9, 16, 30, 40
PAR-38
45
11, 25
9, 12, 30, 50
12,28
50
10,25
501R
9,25
60
10, 30, 40
10, 12, 30
9,12, 28
75
9,25
10, 12, 30
10, 27
90
10,25
9, 12, 30, 50
12, 28, 60
100
11, 27
_
1 OOR
10, 25, 40
120
10, 30, 50
150
9, 12, 30, 50
_
250
11, 32
ax or - ,ones . Ig emp. eramica um
Base with 18" Silicon Lead Wires Brass Nickel Plated Conlact
LAMP LIFE: 2,000+ Hours Average Rating • MOUNTING: Supplied by Others.
Normally a Weather-proof )unction Box or FA-26 PVC Mounting Pedestal or FA-
39 PVC Mounting Pedestal w/ 6 Ft. Cord & Plug.
WIRING: Standard 120 volt • FINISH: Black Polyester Powder Coal for DL-38-
NL Series • Black Texture Polyester Powder Coat for DL-20-NL & DL-30-NL
Series a FINISH OPTIONS: Antique Verde, Bronze, Hunter, Rust, Verde
(Brushed), Weathered Brown or White: Add -Color to Catalog:
CAST BRASS OPTIONS: For DL-20-NL Series Only. For Unfinished Brass: Add -
Brass to Catalog:. For Polished Brass: Add -Brass Polished to Catalog:. For
Sealed w/Clear Polyester Powder Coal: Add -Brass Sealed to Catalog:. For Acid
Verde Finish: Add -Acid Verde to Catalog:.
ACCESSORIES:
FA-08 Black 1/4" Mini Cell Louver for DL-20-NL-EC
FA-08-30 Black 1/4" Mini Cell Louver for DL-30-NL-EC
FA-08-38 Black 1/4" Mini Cell Louver for DL-38-NL-EC-L
FA-10-20 Colored Plastic Gel for DL-20-NL-EC (Blue or Green). Select One
FA-10-30 Colored Plastic Gel for DL-30-NL-EC (Blue or Green). Select One
FA-10-38 Colored Plastic Gel for DL-38-NL-EC-L (Blue or Green). Select One
FA-26 Black PVC Mounting Pedestal 2.5" Diameter Threaded 112" NPS
w/ 16" Ground Wire
FA-30-34 Black Aluminum Extension Wand & Coupler 10, 13, 16, 21, or
26" Tall. Select One.
FA-36 Black Aluminum Extension Collar Only for DL-38-NL
FA-37 Clear Convex Glass Lens & Black Retaining Ring for FA-36
FA-38 Black Texture Extension Cap w/ Glass Lens for DL-20-NL
FA-39 Black PVC Mounting Pedestal 2.5" Dia. Threaded 1/2"NPS w/ 6 Ft.
Cord & Plug
FA-40 Slack Texture Extension Cap w/ Glass Lens for DL-30-NL
Note: DL-38-NIL has 2 Accessories: FA-36 & FA-37 .You Must Order the FA-36
Collar if you Want to Use the Convex Glass Lens. All Extension Can% nr Cnllarc
_�,; 027
Robert J. Capet2
P.O. Box 1144
La Quinta, Ca 92268
License #744091
November 19, 2001
Ms. Maria Casillas
CITY OF LA QUINTA
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
Re: 51-370 Avenida Bermudas. La Quinta, CA 92253
Dear Maria,
Following are the estimated pricing for the improvements of the office building located at the
above address:
1.
Painting Exterior
$ 7,700.00
2.
Trellis
$ 2,000.00
3.
Tile work / Demo and Installation
$ 2,599.00
4.
Tile - cost
$ 621.57
5.
Landscape Improvements
$ 1,265.00
6.
Exterior Lighting
$ 1,568.51
7.
Parking Lot Wall
$ 1.645. )0
Total $17,399.08
Thank you.
Robert J. Capetz
Owner
Pic/CZ
r29
11!13;2001 06:24 619360454E BOWER PAINTING: PAGE 02
THOMAS BOWER PAINTING `. EStIt11lat@
19-331 SPALDING DRIVE
BERNtiMIN
ES, NES, CA 92'2I'll .Date Estimate $
1111312001 S
Name/Address JO8
SUN VISTA/OFFICE '
51-370 BERMLIDAS, STE 2
LA QLIINTA CA 92253 51-370 I3.ERMUDAS,LA QUINTA
i
Description
EXTERIOR PAINTING
COVER AND PROTECT ALL (,ONCRETE,WINI)OWS,LANDSCAPING AND ELECTRICAL
FIXTURES.
POAT-R WASH PLASTER TO REMOVE DIRT AND DEBRI.
PLASTER: REPAIR ALL CRACKS AND APPLY (2) COATS EXTERIOR ACRYLIC PAINT.
DOORS AND WOOD T .RIM: REiPAIR DAMAGED AREAS,SPOT PRIA'ffi AS NEEDED AND APPLY (2)
COATS SEMIGLOSS ENAM-EL.j
i
WOOD BEANAS: (2) COATS SCUD I3ODY STAIN-
WROUGHT IRON: PRI-PARE AND APPLY (2) COATS EXTERIOR FLAT BLACK ENAMEL.
i
029
AA CCSSTrUCTOCN
Contractors License No: 746198
Proposal For:
SUN VISTA DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Attn: Rob Copetz
P.O. Box 1144
Lo Quinta, CA 92253
FAX: 771-4922
Job Description: Office Patio Cover, 51 370 Avenida Bermudas La Quinta, CA j
TOTAL
I HUUUH CAHPENI RY PER PLAN: Labor. Lumber & Hardware $2.000.00 1
IAll Wood to Wood Connections
Provide Materials Handling Equipment/Scatfoldinq as Necessary
No Finisl
No Steel
Permits by Others
Progress Payment Schedule
100%
This proposal is based on plans provided. Labor detail, Lumber grades and specifications, and Hardware are priced accordingly. All Work
to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications will be
done only upon written or oral agreement and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements are contingent on
strikes, weather or unforseen delays beyond our control.
A&M CONSTRUCTION
Date: November 12, 2001
P.O. BOX 366 / LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 / PHONE: (760) 564-4832 / FAX: (760) 564-0406
030
FROM : UanDvke Tile FAX NO. : 7E0-'G-. 9723 Nov. 13 2001 08!:33PM P1
amwe ?ale. marble & Storiee
40-288 Orchid Tree et.
tic# 737892 Palm Desert. Ca. 02260
Customer Fax# (760) 868-9723
SUN VISTA (760) 340-8433
DEVELOPEMENT
OFFICE BUILDING
REPAIRS
PROPOSAL
DESCRIPTION
DEMO- Remove existing Tile from Suite 42 Doorway,Water Feature
Surround, Tile Mosiac at Suite #2, Tile Wall at Sitting Area, Surround and
Deck at Drinking Fountain, and all other Suite and Office Numbers,
Install new Tile at Drinking Fountain, Sitting Area Wall and Water
'Feature. Refloat were necessary. Water Feature wall to have water
proofing applied prior to floating.
i This Proposal includes all Labor and Supporting Material to complete the
items mentioned above. Owner is to purhase replacement tile.
ACCEPTED BY;
I
Total
DATE 11 /13/2001
AMOUNT
565.00
2,034.00
$2,599.00
031
FROM :Morena Tile & Stone
DOCUient, rrder Acknowledgement - Ouote Order
Cust 4: 7607714722
fill Jul BUN VISTA DCVELOPMENT CORP.
PO BOX 1144
LA OUINTA, CA 42253
Ship Too SUN VISTA DEVELOPMENT CORP.
51-370 AVENIDA BERMUDES, 42
LA OUINTA, CA 42253
FAX NO. :7E03215743 Nov. 19 2001 03:18PM P1
UPC Vendor Invoice Date Order 4
000000 9222390-00
Po Date PO 4 Page 4
11/19101 NARK 1
Correspondence In. NDRENA TILE k STONE - CAT CITY
17601 321-1210 FAX: 321-5743
69625 PERE1 ROAD UNIT 20
CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234
Instructions
Ship Point Via Shipped
MORENA TILE t STONE - CAT CITY HILL CALL
Product UPC Duantity Duantity Quantity Oty
Ln4 And Description Ites4 Ordered 1.0. shipped ON
1 SESILICIUM 7.517.5 OOODO 140.18 SF
SILICIUN 7.5X7,5 FIELD/ ANTIQUE TERRACOTTA
1 Lines Total gty Shipped Total 140.18
Last Page
Unit Price Discuuat
Price UM Multiplier
-------------------------- ---
4.13 SF 0.00
Total
Tares
Invoice Total
Was
1.5% 15 Nap
Amount
(Nut)
57B.44
572.94
43.47
622.36
ARID ZONE LANDSCAPE VAVAVAVAVAVAVAVAVA®
P.O. BOX 706 • LA QUINTA, CA 92253 • Telephone (760 564-6201)
PROPOSAL
TO; SUN VISTA DEV.
LA QUINTA, CA.
RE; SITE IMPROVEMENTS -OFFICE ON CORNER OF CADIZ AND AVE BERMUDAS
TO INCLUDE; AS PER PLAN-5-FLATS FLOWERS
35-5G SHRUBS
DEMO EXSISTING SHRUBS (AS NEEDED)
REMOVE ALL SITE ROCKS
ADD SOIL TO PLANTING AREAS AS NEEDED
TRANSPLANT 4 OLEANDERS
TOTAL BID;
11-11-01
THANK YOU
$ 1,265.00
-i % 033
ESTIMATE'l WORK ORDER
NO. 00107G
BILLING ADDRESS r, JOB ADDRESS _
NAME NAME - •(V �, ,/,i % �'!'11r f !i. �,
ADDRESS ADDRESS
x
TEL# CONTACT TEL# tr "'-' CONTACT_
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
This estimate is only good for 30 days. Priming is based on time plus material. It specified work exceeds this estimate,
customer will be notified immediately. The estimated total includes all labor and material. All material to be as
specifier. All work to be completed in a substantial workmanlike manner per standard practices. Payment in full is
required upon completion of work.
Hegge Electrical Contractors, Inc. is not responsible for repairing drywall that has been cut during electrical instal-
lation. We will replace the cut piece to its original location.
ACCEPTANCE OF ESTIMATE: The prices below, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby
accepter. You are authorized to do the work as specified.
SIGNATURE
DATE
SERVICE CALL RATE
LABOR RATE PER
MAN HOUR AFTER
INITIAL SERVICE CALL
PER
HR.
OTY
MATERIAL- PARTM
UNIT
EXT.
JOB DESCRIPTION r
t-'
ONE YEAR GUARANTEE — NEW INSTALLATION
90 DAY GUARANTEE - REPAIR WORK
Hegge Electrical Contractors, Inc. guarantees all labor and materials on new installation
(lamps Is batteries excluded) furnished hereunder for one year, and guarantees repair work for
90 days, It suit shall be brought to enforce this contract it is expressly agreed that venue shall
be in the India Judicial District, County of Riverside, State of California.
SERVICEMAN
I hereby acknowledge the satisfactory completion of the above described work. If payment is
not made when rue, Buyer agrees to a charge on the amount past due at the rate of 1-1/2%
per month (18% per annum). It it is necessary for Hegge Electrical Contractors, Inc. to institute
legal proceedings against Buyer to enforce terms of this contract. Hegge Electrical Contractors,
Inc. shall be entitled to recover from Buyer its reasonable attorneys fees, late tees and costs.
x
ignalure upon satislactory completion
LABOR X :00 per hour /
MATERIAL
SERVICE CALL
MISC.—
PAID BY CHK. #
TOTAL •'
x
Initial Clean up of lob Site area
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO:
HEGGE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. _ n 3
FOR ALL BILLING INQUIRIES CALL (760) 771-5553.
........, — . It, u,now mi cA cc PAV Tul¢ rnnrnlrF NO STATFMFNT WILL RE ISSI IFD_
11i07t2001 11:57 76077/4295 SUN VISTA TMAT LER PAGE 01
NOV. 07 ' 01 (vranl 15 CH .
PROPOSAL
ROBERT TAYL,OR COMPANY
MA80NRY CONTRACTOR
72-M DUNHAM WAY, SUITE E
THOUSAND PALma, CA 92276
BUS: (700) 343-0166 ` FAx: (750) 343-0665
errIA owl7l
24 LIN. FT. x S FT. HIGH 6XEXIO GAROEN WALL WITH FOOTING
BROWN COAT AND PLASTER
'P)YWT AND PEFMaT BY OTHERS
PAGE W5,1 OF 1 PAGE$
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2001
76M76.7468
M
760n71-4699
&INAMe
SUNVISTA DEVELOPMENT
AV LOCA
OFFICE PARKING LOT WALL
LA QUINTA, CA
$W.00
S"15.00
UTANDAFM EX0LtDSM8: GRADING, GRADES, WALL LINES, 6ACKCUT,BAr7qILLM)QOROIRTREMOVAL PEFaaT FEi_5,TESTMAPD
INSPECTION COSTS. FURNISHING OF WATER, POWER, SHORING. BRACING, DOLTS A EMBEDS, ADDITIONAL INSURED FEE
"ALL PMCRA $IM I!CT TO CHANGE MNiHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. —
Will Propow holy to furnish msfor al end I&W - oompeb M a(rwan(o Mifh above sp ofts lone, to., the sum at
ONE THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED FORTY FIVE AND NO1100-- ($1,645.00)
Payment to be maw as ►oibwr: ON COMPLETION
AmOorlmd Note: This popood my be w thdrawn by ae,
atolaaw _ PTesiclal t N wort dooa hot common(! wltl4n t6 doya.
t an oa
walk m
a
035
November 19, 2001
Ms. Maria Casillas
CITY OF LA QUINTA
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
RE: 51-370 Avenida Bermudas, La Quinta, CA 92253
Dear Maria:
Thank you for the opportunity to purpose the enhancements of the commercial building
located at the address listed above. We propose to complete the following work:
I . Paint the exterior of the building
2. Tile work — demo and installation
3. Tile Cost
4. Landscape Improvements
5. Exterior Lighting / Landscape Lighting
6. Parking lot Block Wall
7. Trellis at suite 2 along Calle Cadiz
Total estimatyd cost for these improvements will be: $19,139.00
Thank YoAA
Rick
P.O. BOX 366 / LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 / PHONE: (760) 564-4832 / FAX: (760) 564-0406
�- 036
R.A. WASSERMAN CONSTRUCTION
COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
(760) 250-2286 / (760) 200-0126 —FAX
C.A. State Lic # B-HIC 681660
November 19, 2001
Ms. Maria Casillas
CITY OF LA QUINTA
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quints, CA 92253
Re: 51-370 Avenida Bermudas. La Quinta, CA 92253
Dear Maria,
Thank you for considering my company for the improvements of the above address.
Which will include the following:
1. Paint the exterior of the building
2. Trellis
3. Tile Work — Demo and Installation
4. Tile Cost
5. Landscape Improvements
6. Exterior Lighting / Landscape Lighting
7. Parking lot Block Wall.
Total estimated cost for these improvements is $20,008.94
Thank you.
Richard Wasserman
President
037
ATTACHIMENT 2
FUNDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS:
This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non-
conforming uses (i.e. signs), and other improvements that enhance the general appearance
of the subject property.
Scale 0-10 points x
50
Category Weight
= weighted score
SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS:
This may include the reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies,
exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the
entrance and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be
considered.
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT:
Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to customers,
neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will
be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or the
expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area.
Scale 0-10 points x
10
Category Weight
= weighted score
OTHER:
This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site
design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational opportunities.
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
APPLICANT MATCHING FUNDS:
Applicants may receive up to 5 points for exceeding the required 10% applicant funding
match.
Scale 0-5 points x Category Weight = weighted score
Total of all weighted scores: divide by 10 (FINAL SCORE)
(70 points required to receive funding)
- 038
't I I A!
Ll F7 -�--
n39