2002 03 13 ALRCAZ
u S
CF'y OF
IV
V
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the
La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
MARCH 13, 2002
10:00 A.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2002-009
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for
public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your
comments to three minutes.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of the Minutes for February 13, 2002.
BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Item .......................
Applicant ................
Location ..................
Request ..................
Action ....................
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
La Quinta Palms Realty, Bruce Cathcart/Jim
Cathcart
West side of Eisenhower Drive at Terminus of
Calle Tampico (51-001 Eisenhower Drive).
Funding request for exterior improvements.
Minute Motion 2002-
ALRC/AGENDA
rt .0 i; 0 01
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
B. Item .......................
Applicant ................
Location .................
Request ..................
Action ...................
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-730
Robert Kraft, Kraft Architects
Ten acre triangular parcel on the south side of
Avenue 52, east of Jefferson Street
Review of building elevations and landscaping
plans for the Clubhouse Apartments.
Minute Motion 2002-
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS
Vill. ADJOURNMENT
ALRC/AGENDA `�'�� 0 02
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
February 13, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
10:00 a.m.
A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called
to order at 10:06 a.m. by Principal Planner Stan Sawa who led the flag
salute.
B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham and David Thorns. It
was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms
to excuse Committee Member Bobbitt. Unanimously approved.
C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Principal
Planner Stan Sawa, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, and Executive
Secretary Betty Sawyer.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Principal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the
Minutes of January 16, 2002. Commissioner Thorns requested that his
name be spelled correctly on Page 2, Item #2. There being no further
corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Thoms to approve the Minutes as submitted.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Capital Improvement Project 2001-14; a request of the City for review
of architectural and landscaping plans for a new fire station to be located
on the west side of Adams Street, north of Miles Avenue.
1. Consultant Planner Nicole Criste presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
G:AWPD0CSAARLCA2-13-02.wpd 1 ., -i„!� (� 003
03
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
February 13, 2002
2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the roof proposed was
standing seam metal roof. Mr. Jerrin Chu, WLC Architects,
architects the project, stated originally there were two options;
one with the concrete tile and one standing seam roof. Committee
Member Cunningham stated his concern was that there is a lot of
roof and with the standing seam metal roof there is a lot more
shadow line with rifts. There should be a color chosen that would
create a little excitement to the building. This area of the City has
a lot of housing developments with a few non-residential buildings,
such as the school with a contemporary building that takers away
the constant red tile roof look. This is an opportunity to create a
little lightness to tie in with the school and the other buildings to
bring color to the area. The concrete tile would be dull. If the
standing seam is used, it should not be gray in color either, but
maybe something in the oxide reds, or maybe green to bring color.
The landscaping lends to the area. Mr. Chu stated originally they
had two options presented to the Council; standing seam and
concrete tile. The Council chose the gray cement tile; to be
compatible in the area. At the same time they wanted to match
the local community and the church and therefore, they went with
the concrete tiles. Committee Member Cunningham stated he did
not know if it was within the Committee's prevue to ask Council
to revisit the subject with the ALRC input. It is a strong structure
and the idea of compatibility does not necessarily mean it needs
to be the same to be compatible. To have it blend in is a mistake.
It needs its own identity. He would ask that the City Council
reconsider their suggestion.
3. Committee Member Thorns sated he did not know if he could
support that comment. This project is adjacent to a church parking
lot, then the church further to the south and to the north is an
open park. On the east side is residential, so this would stand out
in the streetscape and the City would be criticized if we took a
City project and allowed a metal roof where there is no
justification other than some shadow lines.
4. Committee Member Cunningham asked Committee Member
Thoms if he thought the tile proposed was the right kind and color.
With each member making opposite comments, there needs to be
some direction to the architect and Council.
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 2
nn4
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
February 13, 2002
5. Committee Member Thorns stated he did not think a public
building should not necessarily try to be in contrast to what the
neighborhood is. It does not need to stand out as a prominent
item. He has no issue with the red tile.
6. Committee Member Thorns asked if the street would be improved
from the park to the church; what ill happen to that section in
front of the pumping station. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste
stated the City is responsible for the improving the length including
the pump station. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated there
would be wrought iron fencing on the north side to give views into
the park and the other two sides would have a block wall. He
then asked about the gate into the pump station. Staff stated it
is unknown other than a block wall. Committee Member Thorns
asked if the landscape plan calls for three palm trees and one
appears to be on top of the flag pole. Staff would note the
change. Committee Member Thorns asked what the standard size
was for a palm tree. Staff stated it is based on the height of the
palm. Committee Member Thorns stated the palms need some
height such as the California palm. He further stated he was not
comfortable with the entrance landscaping. He would like to see
the landscaping over a grading plan. This site will be at the same
elevation as the pump station. As the pump station is higher than
the park and street, so the entrance will have a gradient. The
landscape design does not seem to recognizes the height
differential. The mounding at the pump station and south of the
driveway could not occur. The entrance does not reflect the
gradient that it will probably turn out to be. The landscape plan
needs to be done over a grading plan. DG is proposed for a slope
and it does not stay on a slope very well. He has no problem with
the palette itself or the lawn versus the decomposed granite, his
concern is the design of the entrance and the design of the use of
the materials in relationship to the ground plate itself. When staff
reviews a more precise plan they should consider the grading plan
at the same time they look at the landscape plan. Also, some vine
material fixed to the concrete wall on the street side and on the
south and west side. On the streetscape between the property
line and curb, there is a meandering sidewalk that is not reflected
on the plan. The plan also calls for a pine tree and within view of
this project there are no pine trees. There is a mixture of pepper
and jacaranda and mesquite, but we do not need to introduce a
pine on this street. Find something that is already existing from
across the street.
7. Committee Member Cunningham stated he would like the block
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 3 „-��U (� 005
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
February 13, 2002
wall to be a split face block. It also calls for stone wainscot on
the lower portion of the building. He would suggest taking the
split face and using it in this area to soften the building. Planning
Consultant Nicole Crist stated staff could add a condition that
wainscoting be the split face block as well and have split face on
the pump station wall on all sides.
8. Committee Member Cunningham suggested a flat tile roof that
blends with the split face. If you are going to veneer the building
with the brown split face, blend the roof color to the spllit face,
then you have the brown with the pump station that will tie it all
together with the split face perimeter wall.
9. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion
2002-005 recommending approval of Capital Improvement Project
2001-14, subject to the conditions as amended:
1. The height of the palm trees is to be substantial.
2. The design of the landscaping along the driveway and over
the entire site shall take into consideration the grade.
3. Vine material shall be added to the wall on the street side,
west side and south side.
4. The pine trees in the streetscape shall be replaced with
something consistent with what is across Adams Street.
5. The perimeter wall shall be split face and a split face veneer
used instead of the wainscoting.
6. The roof color shall be compatible with the split face color.
Unanimously approved.
B. Site Development Permit 2001-729; a request of Michael Shovlin for
Ross Dress for Less) for review of architectural plans for a 30,187 square
foot commercial building to be located on the orth side of Highway 1 1 1 1,
east of Washington Street within the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping
Center.
1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
2. Committee Member Thoms asked about the roof color. Staff
stated it would match what is existing in the Center.
3. Committee Member Cunningham stated it is keeping with the
G:AWPDOCS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 4 ��� 0 0 6
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
February 13,2002
Center. With regard to the color, color is getting to be the trend
and there is a lot of responsibility with color. Staff needs to ask
for the actual color chips and where the color lines break. He has
no objections to this project.
4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Cunningham/Thorns to adopt Minute Motion
2002-006 recommending approval of Site Development Permit
2001-729, subject to the conditions as recommended.
Unanimously approved.
C. Capital Improvement 2001-10; a request of the City for review of
architectural plans for a two story detached addition and rehabilitation of
the Historic City of La Quinta Historic Society Museum located at the
southeast corner of Avenida Montezuma and Calle Mendoza (77-885
Avenida Montezuma).
1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
2. Committee Member Cunningham stated he had no objection. He
asked if they would be using random mudded and . Mr. Paul
Johnson, architect for the project, stated he proposing to use red
boosting throughout the roof. They do not want the roof to be too
rough but do want texture and character. The stucco color will be
similar to what is existing.
3. Committee Member Thorns asked about the existing door and if
there was any connection to the paved area. Staff stated it would
stay as it is historical.
4. Committee Member Thoms asked about the planters. Mr. Johnson
stated the planters would be added to the top of the pavement.
They would be detached and protected to retain it for historical
purposes. Additional planters would be added as well. All existing
trees will be retained as much as possible. Committee Member
Thorns asked about the four palms and stated they should be used
as an accept; four are too much and they should be replaced and
a desert scheme used. If shade is wanted use the Palo Verde.
5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion
00-
G:AW PDOCS W RI,C\2-13-02.wpd 5 1
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
February 13, 2002
2002-007 recommending approval of Capital Improvement Project
2001-10, as recommended. Unanimously approved.
D. Site Development Permit 2001-728; a request of Stamko Development
Company for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a retail
shopping center, plant nursery, garden center, auto repair, specialty shop,
nd an auto service station, in conjunction with Retail Building "B".
1. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the
information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file
in the Community Development Department. Staff asked the
material and color of the canopy for the proposed gas station. Mr.
Bill Parrish, architect for the project, stated it would be made out
of metal and would be blue and painted to match.
2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant wanted to
give a presentation. Mr. Gary Shepner, Perkowit, gave a
presentation on the project.
3. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the fonts shown on the
elevations would be used for the signage. Mr. Shepner stated it
was their hope. Committee Member Cunningham stated it bring
an identify to each of the retail centers. The design is modern and
contemporary and not over the top which is good. This will work
with the other new buildings in the area. He likes the metal work
in the front as it is proportionate.
4. Committee Member Thorns asked where the accent red color
would be used. Mr. Shepner stated it would be used where the
blue is shown on the elevation. Committee Member Thorns asked
if each building has its own accent color. Mr. Shepner stated yes.
Committee Member Thorns asked if the landscape plans would
come later. Community Development Director Jerry Herman
stated yes, after the approval process. Committee Member Thorns
stated he would like to see that there is some kind of landscape
statement made, other than a sea of trees, at the entrance to tie
it together. Ms. Chris Clarke, the applicant, stated this is an
addition to the auto center and the same theme will flow over to
this project for the entire 90 acres. Statements have been made
and awards won for the Highway 11 landscape theme.
5. Committee Member Cunningham stated the auto center was done
in conjunction with the City's landscaping plans.
G:\WPDOCSW2LC\2-13-02.wpd 6
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
February 13, 2002
6. Committee Member Thoms stated he concurs with the landscape
statement, but does not see it in the plans. There is no statement
being made here. Ms. Clarke stated the monument signs and
landscaping will be carried over to this project. She went on to
explain the design. Discussion followed regarding the landscaping.
Mr. Chuck Sicre, landscape architect gave a presentation on the
materials to be used. He explained that when the detailed
drawings are made it will allow for a better concept.
7. Committee Member Cunningham stated that if the architectural
elements on the front of the buildings were carried over to the gas
station it would soften up the look of roof structure, it would add
to the statement of the project.
8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Cunningham/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion
2002-008 recommending approval of Site Development Permit
2001-725, subject to the conditions. Enhance the landscape entry
statement. Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Thoms to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and
Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on March 6, 2002.
This meeting was adjourned at 1 1 :20 a.m. on February 13, 2002.
Respectfully submitted,
BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
G:AWPDOCSVARLCA2-13-02.wpd 7 n n q
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION
MARCH 13, 2002
2002-014
BRUCE CATHCART, JIM CATHCART
LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY
FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
WEST SIDE OF EISENHOWER AT TERMINUS OF CALLE TAMPICO
(51-001 EISENHOWER DRIVE)
The property owners, Bruce and Jim Cathcart, have submitted an application under the
Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking funding for exterior
improvements which will restore the historic building to its original condition. The
improvement includes the removal of exterior air conditioning ducts. This necessitates
the installation of a new ductless air conditioning unit. The total cost of the unit is
estimated at $2,980.00. The applicant will provide a 10% match of $298.00, and is
requesting $2,682.00 in CPIP funds. The cost estimate is attached, and states that
the labor is being provided to the project free of charge. Upon ALRC approval, the
applicant is required to submit a second cost estimate.
In October 2000, the applicants received approval for CPIP funding in the amount of
$15,000 to re -stucco the building exterior; replace vertical support posts on the front
shade structure; restore plank door and wood sash windows; place Sautillo tiles on the
front sidewalk; remove and replace the roof; and erect a new masonry sign and garden
walls. The work was completed in May 2001. It should be noted that there are no
regulations within the CPIP that preclude the award of funding to properties in
succeeding years.
As with other applications, a Funding Criteria worksheet is attached to this staff report
(Attachment 2) to facilitate scoring.
if approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City
departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After Receiving
all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into a loan program agreement
with the applicants.
010
The applicant has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that one or more
persons will be present at the March 13, 2002 ALRC meeting.
Prepared by:
Debbie Powell, Management Analyst
City Manager's Office
Attachments:
Submitted by:
Stan Sawa, Principal Planner
Community Development
Department
1 . CPIP application: Bruce/Jim Carthcart, La Quinta Palms Realty
2. Funding Criteria Worksheet
oil
ATTACHMENTS
0va
La Quinta
Palmy ATTACHMENT 1
Realty
February 27, 2002
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
Re: 5 1 -001 Eisenhower Dr. — CPIP Application
Attn: Debbie Powell
Dear Debbie,
As per our telephone conversation, enclosed is a completed application for the
Commercial Property Improvement Program. As you can see from the photos and cost
estimate this is a simple project.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely, G -
CGLz��'G>
Jim Cathcart
La Quinta Palms Realty
51-001 Eisenhower Drive • La Quinta, CA 92253 O
(760) 564-4104 • Fax (760) 564-0344
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
. s Commercial Property Improvement Program Application
Fiscal Year 2001-2002
Applicant Information
Applicant Name: Jim Cathcart
Applicant Phone: 7F0/564 4104 ApplicantE-Mail: lcA:talms@aol.com:
Name of Business: La Quinta Palms Realty
Mailing Address: 51001 Eisenhower Drive, La Quinta
Business Phone: 760/564-4104 Business Fax: 760 564-0344
Property Owner: Yes: XXX No:
Business Owner: Yes: XXX No:
Project Information
Business Location: 51001 Eisenhower Drive La Quinta
Type of Business: Real Estate
ProjectGoals: Restore portion of Historic building
to original —
Proposed Improvements: Remove exterior air conditioning
ducting and replace with new air unit
Total Project Cost (please attach cost estimate): $2980.00
Requested Agency Assistance: $2682.00 Applicant Match: $298.00 _
Description of Applicant Funding Sources: cash on band
Proposed Project Duration:
Attachments
Two (2) color photographs of the property where improvements will be instailed
Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level) — photos
Cost estimates
certification Statements
If the applicant is not the owner of the subject Property, the following certification must be
completed by the property owner:_
�:/flrl7c'S C/�TJiC?,4/ declare under penalty and perjury that I am the owner of
property involved in this application. I acknowledge that only one (1) tenant of the subject
property involved in this application may be awarded Program funding in any one (1) given fiscal
year.
Signature:
Date:
The followin/te/menji'mu'stbe completed�theappficanty and propertyowner.
I/we acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all above information is true and
correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. I/we understand that a Building Improvement
Rebate Agreement must be signed and authorized by Ile La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
RrjQ[ to oommenan any ork n th project.
Signature: Date:
Signature:
Date:
Please return the completed application, with required attachments, to:
City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
C/o Maria casillas 014
78-495 Calle Tamnirn
4" Yn t1RR nI __.. rage No. of Pages
BIGHORN HEATING & COOLING
Ca lic # 774901
P.O. Box 4543
PALM DESERT, CA 92261
(760) 773-3969 Fax (760) 773.3471
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO
PHONE
DATE
STREET
JOB NAME
CITY. STATE and ZIP CODE
JOB LOCATION
Gtu .r, A
ARCHITECT
DATE OF PLANS
JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
SS , '--�% Li %. F7 �7 U.F-/
n
A-'
J
(�
rat" N.ur,1a/z
I. jAcl .,_,7.
y_
We prOpm hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
dollars (s —�
Payment to be made as follows:
J�
All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike
manner according to standard Any deviation from Authorized
practices. alteration or above specifications
Signature I_ LLL
f `
involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra
charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents
or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Note: This proposal may be
Our workers are fully covered by Workman's Compensation Insurance. _ withdrawn by us if not accepted within��-� days.
Arreptaure of proposal— The above prices, specifications
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
To Reoroer.
FUNDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET ATTACHMENT 2
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS:
This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non-
conforming uses (i.e. signs), and other improvements that enhance the general appearance
of the subject property.
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS:
This may include the reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies,
exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the
entrance and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be
considered.
25
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT:
Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to customers,
neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will
be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or the
expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area.
10
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
OTHER:
This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site
design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational. opportunities.
10
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
APPLICANT MATCHING FUNDS:
Applicants may receive up to 5 points for exceeding the required 10% applicant funding
match.
10
Scale 0-5 points x Category Weight = weighted score
Total of all weighted scores: divide by 10 = (FINAL SCORE)
(70 points required to receive funding)
Mu
1.` 1 T�< j�('i
•+ fi
\i. �
�.�.
' � � f
e 1 q yl � y �, ��� �� x t—'�
�,'; � _ '
'� �Sr
e ` a :4
-�� `�'.
M y '.: ,
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 13, 2002
CASE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) 2002-730
REQUEST: REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND
LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THE CLUBHOUSE
APARTMENTS
LOCATION: 10.76 ACRES TRIANGULAR PARCEL ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF AVENUE 52, EAST OF JEFFERSON
STREET
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
SURROUNDING
ZONING/LAND USE
CLUBHOUSE ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
ROBERT KRAFT, KRAFT ARCHITECTS
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
NORTH:
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
SOUTH:
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
EAST:
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
WEST:
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL INC)
The currently vacant triangular 10.76 acres project site is located on the south side
of Avenue 52, approximately 600 feet east of Jefferson Street; with the All American
Canal on the eastern property line.
The applicant proposes eighteen buildings with eight different floor plans and similar
elevations. Floor plans are one and two bedrooms (some with dens) ranging in size
from 752 square feet to 1,308 square feet. Proposed are 149 apartment units for the
project. Buildings are one, two, and three stories with a maximum 40' height and
5:12 roof pitch.
AAARC staff rpt. SDP 2002-730.wpd
019
All buildings are proposed to have a similar contemporary design, each proposed
building will be covered with flat concrete tile and walls will have a stucco finish. The
proposed roof style is a gable style with pyramid and dome style roofed stairwells
with flat concrete tile and ceramic tile respectively. Also proposed is a twenty two
foot high 6,000 square foot 'I" shaped Clubhouse with a similar design using the
same materials as the proposed units.
All proposed windows for the apartments are multi -pane with slider glass doors.
Aluminum frames are proposed for all windows including the sliding glass doors that
lead to outdoor patios or balconies covered with stained wood trellis'.
All three story buildings are proposed to have garages (with roll -up wood panels) and
storage with two levels of dwelling units above the garages. Carport structures are
freestanding with support posts located at the front of the stall; they are 12 feet high
and custom constructed prefabricated painted steel with fabric roofs.
The Landscaping Plan identifies a pallette of plant material consisting of shrubs,
groundcover, and trees for the entries, the setbacks , the on -site planting areas, and
the building perimeter planters. For the required landscape setback on Avenue 52 the
applicant proposes 26 "Desert Museum" Palo Verde trees. California Fan Palms and
Mexican Fan Palms accent the two gated project entries and entry wall on Avenue
52; Queen Palms surround and define the pool area. Date Palms are scattered
throughout the courtyards and walkways. A variety of additional trees for shade and
accent are proposed (all with 1.25 to 1.5 calipers) throughout the site. They include:
Hong Kong Orchid Tree, Flame Tree, Palo Brea, Chinese Pistachio, Chilean Mesquite,
Pomegranate, and Texas Mountain Laurel. Colored pavers are proposed to delineate
courtyards, pathways, patios, and pool decking.
FINDINGS:
The Committee is required to comment on the following findings:
Architectural Design - The architectural design of the project, including but not limited
to the architectural style, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof
style, and other architectural elements are compatible with the surrounding
development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city.
1. The project is compatible with surrounding future land uses in that it is mainly
residential in appearance and will be consistent with the quality of design in the
area including architectural features and details, color, and roof treatment and
the quality of prevalent surrounding design.
AAARC staff rpt. SDP 2002-730.wpd
020
Landscape Design - Project landscaping, including but not limited to the location,
type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials has been designed so as to
provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements
and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between
adjacent land uses and between development and open space, provide an overall
unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, and complement the
surrounding project area, ensuring lower maintenance and water use.
1 . The proposed landscaping plan includes adequate landscaping treatment along
Avenue 52, the parking lot areas, landscape setbacks, the interior of the site
including the courtyards, walkways, and the perimeter of the buildings. The
plant palette material is compatible with the proposed design and Zoning Code
requirements. The proposed landscaping plan includes Date Palms trees in
undesirable high use activity locations including pedestrian corridors and
courtyards. Staff recommends eliminating the use of Date Palms trees in the
landscape palette and substituting it with another palm tree type such as
California Fan Palm or Mexican Fan Palm.
Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of the architectural style and
landscaping plan for Site Development Permit 2002-730, subject to the following
condition:
1 . Eliminate the use of Date Palms trees in the landscape palette and substitute
it with another palm tree type such as a California Fan Palm or a Mexican Fan
Palm.
Attachments:
1 . Site Plan, Elevations, and Landscape Plan
Prepared by:
Fred Baker, ICP
Principal Planner
A:\LARC staff rpt. SDP 2002-730.wpd
021