The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 05 01 ALRC�FM OF'CK4'�wS IV V ARCI•IITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California MAY 1, 2002 10:00 A.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2002-015 CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call PUBLIC COMMENT This is the; time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes for April 3, 2002. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Item ...................... Applicant ............... Location ................. Request .................. Action .................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-734 Sky West Corporate Centre Group LLC On the north side of Corporate Centre Drive, and east of Adams Street. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for a multiple tenant two story light industrial building. Minute Motion 2002- ALRC/AGENDA 1�11u i i, 001 ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE B. Item ....................... Applicant ................ Location ................. Request .................. Action .................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-736 Tenet Care California, Inc. East side of Washington Street between Avenue 47 and Avenue 48. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for a medical facility. Minute Motion 2002- C. Item ....................... COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2002-012 Applicant ................ Scott Wilson. Location ................. 78-150 Calle Tampico. Request .................. Request for landscaping/hardscape improvements. Action .................... Minute Motion 2002- D. Item ....................... COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2002-013 Applicant ................ Denise DuBerry-Hay Location ................. 78-140 Calle Tampico. Request .................. Request for landscaping/hardscape improvements. Action .................... Minute Motion 2002- E. Item .................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-731, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-732, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-733 Request ............... Consideration of a motion to rescind Minute Motions 2002-011, 2002-013, 2002-014 recommending approval of the above -noted cases to the Planning Commission at the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee Meeting of April 3, 2002. Action ................. Minute Motion 2002- VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS VIII. ADJOURNMENT .UJU002 ALRC/AGENDA MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA April 3, 2002 CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This; meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:07 a.m. by Principal Planner Stan Sawa who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, and David Thorns. It was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to excuse Committee Member Cunningham. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Management Analyst Debbie Powell, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planners Wallace Nesbit and Martin Magana, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: A. It was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to reorganize the agenda to take Item "D" first. Unanimously approved. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Principal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of March 13, 2002. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to approve the Minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: D. SiL' Development Permit 2001-731; a request of WG Properties, LLC for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a medical/office building consisting of 8,792 square feet to be located on the east side of Washington Street, north of Lake La Quinta Drive. G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\4-3-02.wpd 003 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes April 3, 2002 Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Thorns asked about the location of the trash enclosure. Mr. Robert Ricciardi, architect for the project, explained its location. Committee Member Thorns asked that the trash enclosure on Caleo Bay be relocated. Mr. Ricciardi agreed. Committee Member Thorns agreed with staff's recommendation on the street scape landscape design. He does not want to see parcels of property on the east frontage having different landscape schemes. Mr. Ricciardi explained it was the same on Washington Street. Committee Member Thorns explained the streetscape on the east side, Caleo Bay, should be compatible with the streetscape is to the north and south. The restaurant and this project should complement each other in regard to the landscaping. Discussion followed regarding the existing landscape material and the proposed. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the vacant pad on the site would be landscaped and who would maintained it. Mr. Ricciardo stated it would be landscaped and maintained. 4. Committee Member Thorns asked about the contents of the retention basin as he did not think it was consistent with what was to the north and south along Washington Street and Caleo Bay. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he would like to see some turf. In regard to the architecture, he has no objections as he thinks it will blend in with the surrounding buildings. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 01 1 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 732, subject to the conditions as submitted and amended: A. Additional turf to parkways. B. Landscaping to complement the landscaping to the north and south along Caleo Bay C. The trash enclosure shall be relocated away from Caleo Bay. Unanimously approved. G:\WPDOCSWdLC\4-3-02.wpd 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes April 3, 2002 B. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-015; a request of Lori Abdelnour, Allstate Insurance for a funding request for exterior improvements for the property located at 55 1 -650 Avenida Bermudas. 1. Management Analyst Debbie Powell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there would be some landscape renovation. Ms. Abdelnour stated yes, it would. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the doors and exterior work would be refinished. Ms. Abdelnour stated the windows would be replaced with glass. The roof would be fixed as well as other repairs. The color would be the original color as recommended by Historic Preservation Commission. She would like to use awnings, but she is trying to match what was there in the 1940's and add texture to the rear of the building. 3. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-012 approving Commercial Property Improvement Program request of Lori Abdelnour, Allstate Insurance with a score of 95. Unanimously approved. C. Site Development Permit 2001-732; a request of Southern California Presbyterian Homes for review of architectural and landscaping plans for an 81 unit senior apartment complex located at the southwest corner of Avenue 47 and Adams Street. Associate Planner Martin Magana presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if this project had been discussed with the Lake La Quinta Homeowners' Association. Staff explained this project had addressed the issues raised by the surrounding property owners. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the material to be used on the carports. Staff stated they would be prefabricated metal with metal canopies. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the material should be something more than a metal prefab carport design, that would fit in more with the architecture of the buildings and surrounding homes. They should G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\4-3-02.wpd 3 .06 005 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes April 3, 2002 be given more architectural treatment. He asked if there was an issue with the Oleander hedge. Staff stated it was intended to stay as it is currently. 3. Mr. Michael Matalon, architect for the project, stated they have not met with any of the property owners. In their discussions with staff, this project was half the density of the previous project and the buildings are a lot further away from their perimeter road. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it would be wise for them to meet with the property owners to ensure there are no issues. 4. Committee Member Thorns agreed with the continuation of the wall down Avenue 47. He asked what enclosure would be constructed along the southern boundary in addition to the Oleander hedge. Staff stated the hedge would remain and berms added. Mr. Tom Doczi, TKD Associates, landscape architect for the project, stated there is an Oleander hedge with chain -link fence that secures the site. Committee Member Thorns stated it is a wire fence not chain -link. Mr. Doczi stated they intended to keep the hedge as it is for privacy. To remove would substantailly open the project up, but a solid wall would close the project in. Committee Member Thorns agrees with the hedge remaining the same, but it needs additional security. Mr. Doczi suggested installing wrought iron at this location. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his problem is the Zielella bacteria infection prevalent in the Valley, which would kill the Oleander hedge. Would the property owners at that time be able to replace the fence? Mr. Doczi stated they could start a back-up planting in case this were to happen to replace the Oleanders. In addition, a wrought iron fence or wall could be installed. Committee Member Bobbitt asked where the irrigation water was coming from. Mr. Doczi stated it is currently coming from Lake La Quinta project and would have to be the responsibility of the applicant. 6. Committee Member Thorns asked what is along the southeast boundary. Mr. Matalon stated that if a second landscaping buffer is installed it would be continued to tie back in with the existing wall on the east property line. The wall would have to be recessed 10 feet to allow for the drainage easement. G:\WPD0CS\ARLC\4-3-02.wpd 4 �J 006 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes April 3, 2002 7. Committee Member Thorns asked what the applicant was referring to when they stated "Natural" landscape. Mr. Doczi stated it would be a desert landscape. Committee Member Thorns asked what is to be used on the ground to stabilize it and keep the blowing sand down. Mr. Doczi stated a combination of ground cover and stabilizer for the soil. In some areas they could use decomposed granite. Committee Member Thorns stated he would not want it to be weeds and tumbleweeds. Mr. Matalon stated it is to be an active site for the project with a walking trail. 8. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that if soil stabilization is used, the walkers will break it up. He would recommend heavier planting. Mr. Doczi stated they would look at adding more plants with the decomposed granite. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that as far as the architecture, he has no issues. 9. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the removal of the wrought iron fencing. He has a problem with the maintenance of them and would prefer a the solid wall. Mr. Matalon stated they would like visibility in and out of the site as well and a solid wall would eliminate this. They would recommend constructing a solid wall for the first couple feet and then pilasters with the wrought iron. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it is an attractive wall, but keep it out of the irrigation. Mr. Doczi sated there could be a planter area and bring some turf panels to visually soften the look. 10. Committee Member Thorns suggested vines growing on the fence. 11. Committee Member Bobbitt suggested the wrought iron be fully welded all the way around to prevent moisture from getting in. 12. Committee Member Thorns recommended the southeast property line be enclosed and the natural area stabilized. He asked what type of lighting was proposed. Mr. Matalon stated there would be lighting within the carports with perimeter light fixtures. He is unaware what the bulb will be. Committee Member Thorns recommended low sodium lights be used. 13. Committee Member Thorns asked about the retention basin material. Mr. Doczi stated soil stabilization and ground cover. 14. Committee Member Thorns asked about the type of tile to be used on the roof. Mr. Matalon stated there are two different types of tile. G:\WPDOCSViRLC\4-3-02.wpd 5 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes April 3, 2002 15. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 013 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 732, subject to the conditions as submitted and amended: A. The proposed pre -fabricated metal carports shall have a similar appearance to the buildings. These materials and colors shall match those of the proposed buildings on site. B. A six foot high block wall with stucco finish shall be installed along the southeast property boundary where the drainage easement is located and tie into the existing wall on the eastern boundary. Said wall shall match the existing materials as the existing wall on the eastern boundary. C. The proposed parking lot lights shown on Sheet E2 of the plan set, shall be amended to include low sodium instead of high sodium lights. D. The northern boundary of the site shall have a combination of a six foot high, stucco wall and wrought iron fence. Said wall shall have a two foot high block wall with stucco and stucco pilasters every 18 feet on center with wrought iron in between the pilasters. The stucco wall/wrought iron fence shall be painted to match the colors of the proposed buildings. Unanimously approved. D. Site Development Permit 2002-733; a request of SECO/SDC, LLC/A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc. for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a 120 room, 1-3 story hotel to be located on the east side of Washington Street, north of Avenue 48. 1. Associate Planner Martin Magana presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Thorns asked if there was a color board. Staff stated not as this time. Only a colored elevation. Committee Member Thorns asked what type of stone would be used. Mr. Lew Bishop stated it is a Chardonnay mixed stone of regular shapes and done in the northern Italian style. They want variety and will be using three different stones to be more irregular. It is a manufactured stone. They want a very old look to the stone and the joints do not show. As far as the colors, it will range from G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\4-3-02.wpd 6 O p O ll O Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes April 3, 2002 light tans to off white to deep oranges and browns for the stucco. It will have a sand finish and three different kinds of exterior finishes. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt questioned the shade covers over the rooms. Mr. Bishop stated they would be metal (alumawood). The railing would be the same material. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his only concern in regard to this product is that it holds up and that it can dent very easily. Mr. Bishop stated where people come in contact with it, they would use iron. Mr. William Swank, owner of the project, gave examples of the problems they have had with the product. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he liked the landscaping. Mr. Bishop stated the object is to accommodate the needs of the transient occupancy. Once you lay out enough deck area for 100 people to lay in the sun, there isn't much left. They will provide the specifics at a later date for review. 5. Committee Member Thorns stated his concern is the same problem that it match the landscaping match the adjoining properties on the perimeter on Washington Street and Caleo Bay. 6. Committee Member Thorns asked if this project drained into the Lake at Lake La Quinta. Mr. Bishop stated it will. They have relocated the retention basin to accommodate the flow. 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 014, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 732, subject to the conditions as submitted and amended: A. The streetscape along Washington Street shall maintain the existing landscaping and Caleo Bay shall be compatible with the projects to the north and south. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMIT -FEE MEMBER ITEMS: None G:\WPD0CSWRLC\4-3-02.wpd 7 •JU 00 9 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes April 3, 2002 VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on May 3, 2002. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1:20 p.m. on April 3, 2002. Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\4-3-02.wpd 8 .J u' O1 J B I #A ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: ARCHITECT: MAY 1, 2002 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-734 SKY WEST CORPORATE CENTRE GROUP LLC 111 VENTURE, LLC PITTMAN GROUP ARCHITECTS REQUEST: APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A MULTIPLE TENANT TWO STORY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATION: ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CORPORATE CENTRE DRIVE AND 800 FEET EAST OF ADAMS STREET BACKGROUND: Site History The proposed office building is within the La Quinta Corporate Centre (Specific Plan 99- 036) on 2.25 acres, and is the fifth building considered within this 36-acre multi -use commercial/industrial center (Attachment 1). Specific Plan 99-036 was approved by the City Council on September 7, 1999, and involves land generally north of Highway 111 between Adams Street and Dune Palms Road. Concerning the style of architecture for new projects, the Plan states: "...contemporary desert based on California Mission, Spanish, southwest and inspired themes found in La Quinta." Corporate architecture is prohibited. A list of permitted building materials and colors for SP 99-036 is: A. Stucco: hand smoothed or vertical -raked textures preferred. B. Masonry: flagstone, adobe or Spanish -style brick, split -faced, fluted, or slumpstone- faced block. C. Wood: exposed, heavy timber, rough sawn beams, glu-lam beams and peeler poles with stain finish (transparent or opaque). D. Glass Block and Stained glass. E. Weathering Metals: copper, iron, bronze used as accents and detail areas. GIALRC SDP734Sky1Nest.wpd/Greg/4-17 .;J0 O11 Off-white to medium earth tones. Wood surfaces shall be stained using medium to dark earth tones and complementary southwest colors (aqua, teal, terra cotta, and whitewash). Additionally, the document states that building forms should be staggered to create visual interest. Buildings up to 35 feet high are allowed in a Commercial Park District. Land uses for Planning Area #1 of SP 99-036 can consist of auto body and services, RV and self storage, hardware and supply, fitness center and other similar uses. SP 99-036 specifies that projects follow a "desert oasis" theme emphasizing water efficient materials exhibiting color and form. "Parking areas in the commercial center will feature the concept of a high canopy tree form to reduce the conflict between landscape elements and project graphics. The project will feature extensive streetscapes along Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road." World Gym, a newly built two story 15,500 square foot facility, is located 210 feet south of this application request. USA Storage is an existing commercial business to the west of the site. PROJECT PROPOSAL: The proposed two story office building is 32-feet in height to the top of the parapet. Both wings of the building total approximately 34,270 sq. ft. of leasable area (Attachment 2 - Site Plan). Exterior tilt -up masonry walls are clad in stucco and painted using light desert color tones in off-white and brown. The south -facing building elevation consists of staggered facade elements in lengths of 24 feet and an accentuated entrance into the clerestory atrium which provides stairway access to the second level. To ascend to the upper level, the developer is proposing three interior stairwells and one elevator. Three wall columns, covered in 12" by 12" Catera stone, accent the primary building entrance which has a decorative walkway that connects to Corporate Centre Drive. Horizontal copper banding is used over the main entrance between the three columns to accentuate this facade. Single glass door entries are proposed for each tenant space. The north, west and east building elevations consist of the similar architectural features found on the south facing facade, excluding enhanced atrium entry. The proposed conceptual landscaping plan includes a plant palette consisting of a variety of specimen trees, shrubs and groundcover. To augment the specimen shade trees (Blue Palo Verde, African Sumac, and Sweet Acacia), palm trees (California Fan) in heights of 24' are being used on accent north and south side building entrances. Five gallon shrubs (six varieties) and one gallon groundcover (three varieties) are shown on the plant list, but GAALRC SDP734Skywest.wpd/Greg/4-17 012 not specified on the plan. The landscape plan proposes perimeter and parking lot landscaping and small planters in front of the building. A 36-inch high meandering berm is proposed for the Corporate Centre Drive parkway which will be partially covered using turf (e.g., no more than 50%). Pedestrian walkways around the building are concrete while a variegated walkway using colored concrete and stone is proposed for the south side building entrance and its connection to Corporate Centre Drive. Additional information on the plan that is not defined is the placement of large granite boulders. A 6' high tan slumpstone masonry wall is planned for the site's interior perimeter boundaries and is planned to be used to construct one trash enclosure. Twelve foot sections of the perimeter wall will be open using 2" by 2" aluminum pickets on six-inch centers. Security lighting consists of 18' high pole mounted fixtures (175 watt metal halide) for the open parking areas and under canopy lighting (70 watt) for carports. Fixture types are hooded to reduce light glare. The applicant's Sign Program is attached, but will be reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 14, 2002. MANDATORY FINDINGS: Findings necessary to recommend approval of this request to the Planning Commission can be made in compliance with Section 9.210.010 of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. Architectural Design. The proposed architectural design of the industrial office building is consistent with the adopted design guidelines of Specific Plan 99-036, in that the design assumes a broad interpretation of contemporary southwest architectural style by using stucco walls, parapet roofing, and inset windows. 2. Landscape Desi n. The proposed landscape plan is consistent with the landscape guidelines of Specific Plan 99-036 in that the proposed plant species comply with the master plant list and accent treatments for the La Quinta Corporate Centre. The proposed landscaping plans do not indicate the number and placement of shrubs, groundcover and boulders, therefore staff recommends in Condition #1 that the plan provide these details prior to submission of the final plan. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 2002-734, subject to the following conditions: GAALRC SDP734Skywest.wpd/Greg/4-17 iij 013 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the final landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Community Development Department showing compliance with the landscape palette for Specific Plan 99-036, including the following: A. The trees used throughout the site shall be eight to 10 feet in height with a minimum container size of 24" box and a minimum trunk caliper size of 1.5- inc:h. B. A dense hedge of five gallon shrubs shall be planted in front of the first row of parking stalls on the south side of the project. C. Granite rock boulders shall be placed randomly along frontage of the site. Attachments: 1. Specific Plan Exhibit 2. Site Plan Exhibit for SkyWest 3. Large Plans (ALRC members only) Associate Planner G:\ALRC SDP734Skywest.wpd/Greg/4-17 - n1� ATTACHMENTS .`� 015 '3 L 7j "$ B '1 '6Z NOLLO3S roa<-Yas rvi / rree-aac feu! yme�r uBid �Ill�adg aJ;uap fi;BJOdJOp s;ulnp s1 IOC YL(IS 'AYY Np<Ary,) y[Illp//Yl ] Il< OHG 3,,S X I V UNY A4 PYS '093] rI u ! V $ 'SB,LYf00SSY ONV HdINS 'OH3fNIYH g }igiyx-=3 Attachment 1 Z—oT— — C e 8 � J'. !L a 0 y W� r it (� J� 2!(/ p0 2 j mmQ pW� 7 / Q i J� mF J� �p � Ja YWW } 04 U a 61HHNHHfO Wi FA a l r -I IF, Fl � III Q ® w w w w a w Q w w w m w® w w w= n lff,j ' 116 Attachment 2 0 • } I ! [ \«! � K % . . . � } .,. 40P!§w§m 2a 10 |°9 M.¥$,)g td§ ;EgrH!$,l+.m:rR§§%Q v | ) r j m CO a 3 / ® 017 MEETING DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: REQUEST: LOCATION ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL MAY 1, 2002 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-736 TENET CARE CALIFORNIA, INC. RTKL ARCHITECTS REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A 25,486 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL FACILITY 2.92 ACRES PARCEL ON THE EAST SIDE OF WASHINGTON BETWEEN AVENUE 47 AND 48 Please prepare your comments on this proposal for discussion at the next ALRC meeting. Listed below are the staff -identified issues relating to or affecting the architectural and landscape aspects of the project: 2. 3. Transmitted by: Fred Baker, AIC Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Project Description .2jo 018 r ew PTMPkk E �. y •A a.M1 sL i ♦t.'; a •c? �y? tea .�. WE /647TH AVENUE 9t8! � z • .y �� ul I k r MS, T�� E��L B��Y�� MALMERO, SMITH nrvn .G / LAND SURVEYING �C. PLANNING /CIVIL ENGINEERING /LAND SURVEYING 777 E. TAHQUITZ CANYON AAY, SUITE 301 La Quinta -Aerial ExhibitID PALM SPRINGS, CALIFOR?i/A 92262-6784 TELEPHONE (760) 320-9817 / FAX 323-7893 n ._VTP LaQuinta, California lrfliLli The TenetCare LaQuinta project is an outpatient surgery and diagnostic facility proposed for development at Washington and 476 Street with access off Caleo Bay near the Lake LaQuinta neighborhood. The building is a 25,800 SF project providing 144 parking spaces according to LaQuinta ordinances. Additionally the site will accommodate both shade trees and structures to cover 50% of the parking. 30% of all spaces will be structured shading according to city requirements. 15% of the site will comply with the city's landscape ordinance planted with high and low plantings to provide both shading and attractive places for respite. The building entrance will face the north with a convenient, protected drop off canopy leading into the facility. Guest parking will primarily be on the north side of the facility with overflow to the east towards Caleo Bay. Staff parking will be on the south side of the facility. The structure will be a steel framed, cast -in -place concrete panel facade with various openings for windows and entries. There will be distinct elements and features of the design that reflect the colors and textures typical of the environment of the desert. The principle facade will be the textured concrete painted a light earth tone. The primary vertical feature near the entry of the project will be a lighter off-white to draw attention to the main entry. The protected walkway canopy at the main entry is a natural cedar sealed for protection from the elements. Parking shading devices will match the building's main entry canopy. The vertical feature supporting the ;shading device in front of the lobby on the left of the main entry is a reddish - brown concrete panel. The glass on the project is a green tinted insulated glass to reduce glare and reflect the harsh rays of the desert sun while providing a complementary color to the palette. Exposed metal framing at doors, windows and miscellaneous locations will be a naturally finished light colored aluminum or a painted metal to match. Another vertical feature to the right of the main entry on the northwest corner of the building is a soft orange -brown to signify the building as a warm, inviting neighborhood business. The northeast corner will also provide a water feature to compliment a pleasing environment outside the building for waiting guests. At required exits and staff entries on the south and east side of the building the doorways will be protected with cedar canopies and a supporting reddish -brown concrete panel. Any exposed equipment on the roof of the building will be protected either by the extended parapet or a metal screen painted to match the building's principle facade color. " Y L BI #C ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: MAY 3, 2002 2002-012 SCOTT WILSON FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH SIDE OF CALLE TAMPICO NEAR DESERT CLUB DRIVE, 78-150 CALLE TAMPICO The property owner, Scott Wilson, has submitted an application under the Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking funding to install new hardscape and upgrade the landscaping. Mr. Wilson owns one of the two buildings in this plaza; the other building has a separate owner. However, both owners are submitting CPIP applications to upgrade the hardscape and landscaping located in the common areas. The two applicants plan on sharing the cost of the landscape improvements, with both contributing CPIP funds to the project. The proposed hardscape improvements consist of removing the existing island, light standard and existing concrete from the main driveway located along Calle Tampico and replacing it with interlocking pavers; the installation of three monument signs - one on each side of the driveway and one at the driveway located on the east side of the property; the installation of curb and gutter per City standards along the main driveway; and the removal of several portions of the existing block wall to be filled in with boulder "clusters" for decorative purposes. The applicant has provided bids for the hardscape work as follows: 1. Ray DuffMasonry - $27,260 2. Demo Unlimited, Inc. (demolition only) - $12,420 3. Workhorse - $60,973 The proposed landscape improvements consist of upgrading the irrigation system, relocating existing palms to form decorative "groupings, removing the existing turf areas; installation of decomposed granite, salt river cobble, and boulders; installation of plants, trees, and shrubs; and the installation of landscape lighting. The goal of the landscape improvements is to upgrade the landscaping to bring it more in line with what is being done throughout the City. The applicant has provided bids for the .�� 021 landscape work. as follows: 1. Quest Landscape Construction - $50,500 2. Desert Scenery - $48,550 3. Mark Logan Landscape - $53,885 4. Wyndham Electric (landscape lighting only) - $9,268 The total project cost for both hardscape and landscape will range from $70,238 to $124,126. The, applicant is requesting the maximum CPIP award of $15,000, and will more than exceed the required 10% match of $1,500. These two properties received CPIP funding for landscaping in the recent past under the former owner. (There was one owner of both properties.) On December 20, 2000, the ALRC approved an application submitted by the previous owner to improve and expand the landscape irrigation system including an irrigation controller, and the installation of plant material. The work was completed in May 2001, and the applicant received payment in the amount of $15,000. The buildings were sold shortly thereafter; however, the new owners believe that the first landscaping job was poorly executed because much of the plant material has died or is not thriving. If both of today's CPIP requests are funded, these properties will have received a total of $45,000 in CPIP funding in less than one year It should be noted that there are no regulations within the CPIP that preclude the award of funding to properties in succeeding years. The agreement signed last year by the previous owner, however, obligated him to maintain property improvements for a period of five years. (See Attachment 2) Accordingly, staff believes that the aesthetics of the proposed project should be evaluated pursuant to improvements upon the property as if the original improvements had been maintained. The proposed improvements will expand upon the previously funded project by upgrading the existing sprinkler -based irrigation system to a drip system; removing turf and replacing it with a desert -theme landscape palette; by the addition of monument signs and pavers in the main driveway; and by the addition of landscape lighting. Therefore, this proposed project goes beyond the parameters of the project approved and funded a year ago. If this project is approved, the actual details of the financing, subject to the program limitations, will be negotiated through an agreement entered into by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and the applicant. As with other applications, a Funding Criteria worksheet is attached to this staff report (Attachment 3) to facilitate scoring of the project. If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After receiving 022 all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into an agreement with the applicant. The applicant's representative has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that he will be present at the May 3, 2002 ALRC meeting. Prepared by: Debbie Powell, Management Analyst City Manager's Office Attachments: 1. CPIP application: Scott Wilson 2. Agreement with Previous Owner 3. Funding Criteria worksheet l ; 023 PROGRAM STEPS (CONY.) be based on the lowest bid amount(s). The applicant may choose any licensed contractor, but the funding award will be based on the lowest bid. 6. If applicable, an architect or design professional will prepare construction drawings. 7. The applicant will obtain three (3) contractor bids. All contractors must be licensed by the State and have a business license with the City of La Quint@. Bids need only be obtained up to the Program limits (i.e. $15,000). For example, if the improvementiconstruction costs are $100,000, the applicant does not need to get three (3) bids for every component or for the total amount. However, if the applicant is seeking $15,000, then three (3) bids must be obtained totaling at least $16.500 ($15,000 plus 10% match of $1,500) for that component being funded by the Program. 8. The applicant will submit the construction bids and proof of contractor insurance to Agency staff. 9. The Agency and applicant will sign a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement (Rebate Agreement) outlining the work to be completed. No work shall commence (other than the initial design activities) until the applicant submits an executed Rebate Agreement and the applicant obtains all applicable building permits. 10. The applicant, or the contractor, will obtain all applicable building permits. 11. The applicant is responsible for project implementation. Construction must start within ninety (90) days from obtaining building permits and be completed within one (1) year after the execution of the Rebate Agreement, 12. The loan may be funded in three equal payments at the applicant's request. Payment of 33% of the total amount will be made when construction commences. Second payment of 33% of the total amount will occur when the project is 50% complete (the Rebate Agreement will describe this milestone). The third payment will be made upon project completion and verification of the items presented in #13 and #14 below If the applicant does not choose the three equal payment plan, the payment will be made upon project completion and verification of the items presented in #13 and #14 below. 13, Upon completion, the applicant must submit photos of the finished project and proof of vendor payment and contractor lien releases. Agency staff will then visit the site to certify project completion within (15) days after receiving these materials from the applicant. 14. The applicant will receive the final progress payment upon verification of project completion. This will occur within fifteen (15) days after the site visit and certification of vendor payments and construction lien releases. For new construction, final progress payments will not be made until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the City and the business is open to the public. 15. Successful applicants must comply with all local, State, and Federal laws, including payment of any prevailing wages as applicable and required by law. ATTACHMENT ` LaQuinta Redevelopment Agency :. Commercial Property Improvement Program Application Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Applicant Information Applicant Name: 7 P77- Applicant Phone: 74-e) 2 37- / 880 Applicant E- Mail: 5y: 4344 30-� Name of Business: _ � � _ Mailing Address: ys,- 9S P•"fc/c .4ve. , Sfe .S y Rw-t.i Yzu u Business Phone: n T-7 we, Business Faxb(ue) &37—op 3G Property Owner: Yes: ✓ No: Business Owner: Yes: No: Project Information Business Location: %S 15-0 Clcde <�"�lCt• Typeof Business: L'-"tCeCc•wele')�A ProjectGoals: Re-JL C'c.«llE,, �cF.rgFC<�:rq Proposed Improvements: Total Project Cost (please attach cost estimate): _ Requested Agency Assistance: -145,c Applicant Match: �/,5v CJ Description of Applicant Funding Sources: L4M/Te-"4s ,,qjr Proposed Project Duration: Attachments,. o . e$ vcr� C s�op.J • Two (2) color photographs of the property where improvements will be installed • Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level) • Cost estimates Certification Statements If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the following certification must be completed by the property owner: I, S Cr-H W, [s' -' , declare under penalty and perjury that I am the owner of property involved in this application. I acknowledge that only one (1) tenant of the subject properly involved in this application may be awarded Program funding in any one (1) given fiscal year. pJ�� Signature: 6.,V- """`"`-- Date: vz�jz�oy fhe following statement must be completed by the applicant and propertyowner IAve acknowledge the filing of this application and certlly, that all above information is true and correct to the best of mylour knowledge and belief. Ilwe understand that a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement must be signed and authorized by tte La Quinta Redevelopment Agency prior to ommence ny workwthe project. Signature: �a"7-zcc Date: xL/i T/o l Signature: Date: Please return the completed application, with required attachments, to: City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency c/o Maria Casillas 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 003 _�� 024 IV 025 04/24/2002 07:05 7603296904 RAY DUFF MAISONRY Lic. 4571-747 13130 Santa Ysabe) Drive Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 (760) 329-6904 - Cell (760) 567-8772 Proposal Submitted To Name n' &FV --_ Street City State _ Zip RAY+DENISE DUFF PROPOSAL Street _4u City --K& --- 4 Dale of Plans Architect PAGE 01 Proposal No. Sheet No. Date Work To Be Performed At State Telephone Number v We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the comp lelion of All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifics- lions submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sumDollars ($ ). with payments to be made as. follows: Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays which are beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by _ n Respectfully submitted Per NOTE —This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Accepted Date Signature 026 Signature Demo UnlfmW Inc. 81750 Avenue 50 Indio, CA 92201 800-337-5884 N4N1E/ADDRESS — - PLAZA "FAMPICO DEWS DU BARRY LA QUINTA. CA Estimate DATE ESTI1^.ATE NO. 4/22/2002 512 PROJECT__ DESCRIPTION TOTAL REMOVE DECORATIVE BLOCK WALL AND FOOTINGS AS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. 'LUMP SUM BID, INCLUDING DUMP FEES 12,420.00 EXCLUSIONS: A. Owner to supply water, water meter, testing, engineering, staking, and permits. B. Demo Unlimited is not responsible for any hazardous material testing or removal. C. Any items buried beneath the surface such as footings, slabs, and septic tanks,. will be: removed and charged on a time and material basis. THIS RID IS GOOD FOR 30 DAYS TOTAL $12,420.00 "J 027 81750 Avenue 50 Indio, CA 92201 800-337-5884 NAME iA,DDRP9S PLAZA TAMPICO DENNIS DU BARRY LA QUIN] A, CA DESCRIPTION REMOVE DECORATIVE BLOCK WALL AND FOOTINGS AS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. "A" DAIE 4/22/2002 512 PROJECT TOTAL I. SAW CUT 1,80000 2. REMOVE CONCRETE FOOTINGS 2,520.00 3. LOAD EXCESS MATERIAL AND HAUL TO DUMP SITE (INCLUDING DUMP FEES) 2,400.00 4. 4000 GALLON WATER TRUCK, FOR ONE WEEK 440.00 5, FOUR LABORERS FOR ENTIRE LENGTH OF PROJECT 4,260,00 TOTAL BID PROPOSAL 12,420.00 "B" I. DEMO TWO BRICK WALK WAYS (INCLUDING DUMP FEES) 900.00 EXCLUSIONS: A. Owner to supply water, water meter, testing, engineering, staking, and permits. B. Demo Unlimited is not responsible for any hazardous material testing or removal C. Any items buried beneath the surface such as footings, slabs, and septic tanks, will be removed and charged on a time and material basis. 'r "THIS BID IS GOOD FOR 30 DAYS .J�; 028 STATE LIC # 790558 Insured (760)363-1945 -office (760)342-8510 -office (760)342-8510 fax PROJECT LOCATION TELE: (760)777-0217 ADDRESSED TO: DATE: 22-Apr-02 Thane International, Atten: Denis FAX: (760)777-0214 78-140 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Ca. 92250 PROPOSED SUMMARY We are pleased to propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessaryfor the completion of the following: Project: Front Entry Renovation- Demolition (As per plans dated April 16, 2002) 1) Remove approximately 120 lineal feet of block wall and footing in eight locations 2) Remove two parking areas- asphalt and curbing 3) Remove front entry sign structure, curbing and light pole stanture 4) Remove asphalt, stamped and salt finish concrete at main entry Labor and Materials- * Notes 8,200.00 a) Price is based on the removal of 150 tons of material- Price subject to change with additional weight b) Rubbish is to be removed to an approved acceptable location c) Price does not include building permits, additional required survey, engineering or significant changes to plan d) Price does not include electrical or landscaping irrigation removal or replacement Any alteration from the above specifications involving extra Respectfully Submitted: costs will be executed only upon written order, and will become an extra charge over and above the proposal. Derek San Soucie Harold Barnes Mailing Address: 51542 Cedar Drive, Morongo Valley, Ca. 92256 .i1�� 029 STATE LIC # 790558 Insured (760)363-1945 -office (760)342-85I0 -office (760)342-8510 fax PROJECTLOCATION TELE: (760)777-0217 ADDRESSED TO: DATE., 22-Apr-02 Thane International, Atten: Denis FAX: (760)777-0214 78-140 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Ca. 92250 PROPOSED SUMMARY We are pleased to propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of the following: Project Front Entry Renovation- Construction (As per plan dated April 16, 2002) 1) Repair opened wall cuts with stucco texture and color to match buildings 2) Install 60 feet of curb and gutter in old parking spaces to match existing per city standards 2-a) Add necessary fill to bring new area to match current planter ground height 3) Front entry- main drive 3-a) Install required sub base sand and tamp to spec. 3-b) Install six inches of concrete sub base along with concrete ribbon at perimeter location 3-c) Install one inch of sand for cushion base for interlocking blocks 3-d) Install 6 mill Olson interlocking blocks per spec 4) Install two (A) entry signs 4-a) Excavate and install 16 inch wide and 12 inch deep footing 4-b) Install 8x8x16 construction grade block- stucco wall, texture and add cap 4-c) Grout cells complete 4-d) Price includes necessary metal in footing and wall 5) Install one (E) entry sign 5-a) Excavate and install 16 inch wide and 12 inch deep footing 5-b) Install 8x8x16 construction grade block- stucco wall, texture and add cap 5-c) Grout cells complete 5-d) Price includes necessary metal in footing and wall Labor and materials- $47,239.00 `Notes - a) Price does not include building permits, additional required survey, engineering or signification changes to plan b) Price does not include electrical or landscaping irrigation removal or replacement Any aheration from the above specifications involving extra Respectfully Submitted: costs will be executed only upon written order, and will become an extra charge over and above the proposal. Derek San Soucie Harold Barnes Mailing Address: 51542 Cedar Drive, Morongo Valley, Ca. 92256 •.uu 030 STATE LIC # 790558 Insured PROJECT LOCATION TELE: ADDRESSED TO: DATE: Thane International, Atten: Denis FAX: 78-140 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Ca, 92250 PROPOSED SUMMARY We are pleased to propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessaryfor the completion of the following: Project Front Entry Renovation - Construction -( Verbal Additions) 1) At 29 foot opening- enlarge planter area 1-a) remove curbing to parking lot area 1-b) remove approximately 180 square feet of asphalt 1-c) install approximately 41 feet of new curbing 1-d) install necessary fill to bring ground level up to existing 1-e) does not include plant, electrical or irrigation removal or installation (760)363-1945 -office (760)342-8510 -office (760)342-8510 fax (760)777-0217 (760)777-0214 2) At concrete stamp walkway to 78-150 main entry- removal and block installation 2-a) remove existing stamped concrete 2-b) install six inches of concrete sub base along with concrete ribbon at perimeter location 2-c) Install one inch of sand for cushion base for interlocking blocks 2-d) Install 6 mill Olson interlocking block 3) Walkway from 78-150 to 78-140 - (West side)- removal and block installation 3-a) remove existing stamped and salt finish concrete 3-b) install six inches of concrete sub base along with concrete ribbon at perimeter location 3-c) Install one inch of sand for cushion base for interlocking blocks 3-d) Install 6 mill Olson interlocking block 4) Walkway from 78-150 to 78-140 - (East side)- removal and block installation 4-a) remove existing stamped finish concrete 4-b) install six inches of concrete sub base along with concrete ribbon at perimeter location 4-c) Install one inch of sand for cushion base for interlocking blocks 4-d) Install 6 mill Olson interlocking block Labor and Materials $ Any alteration from the above specifications involving extra Respectfully Submitted: costs will be executed only upon written order, and will become an extra charge over and above the proposal. Derek San Soucie Harold games Mailing Address: 51542 Cedar Drive, Morongo Valley, Ca. 92256 5, 031 ISCAPE CONSTRUCTION, INC. LANDSCAPING CONTRACT PROPOSAL Wilson & Johnson 78-150 Calle Topica LaQuinta, Ca 760-497-48913 John Johnson Re: Tampico Plaza LaQuinta, Ca. April 24, 2002 Quest Landscape Construction hereby proposes to furnish the materials and labor necessary for the completion of landscape and irrigation according to plans byRay Martin dated 01/22/02. Scope of work: Deliver and install the following: 8 15Gal Chamaerops 116 5gal shrubs 17 1gal shrubs 11 6' fouquieria 60 1'-3' Boulders 168 tons) Brimstone D.G. 1 remove existing landscape only irrigation as built allowance 30 day maintenance Pr000sal $30,100.00 Scope of work : deliver and install 6 30' phoenix dactylifera diamon cut Option total $14,100.00 Scope of work: Relocate 12 washingtonia robusta Option total $6,300.00 April 24, 2002 81-291 B 42ncl Avenue • Indio, CA 92203 • Tel: (760) 342-7250 • Fax: (760) 342-7260 QLCINC@MSN.COM LIC. # 788049 All work to be done in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from specifications on this contract involving extra costs will be executed only upon written permission and will become an extra charge over and above this estimate. Any set backs on your behalf or another contractor that prevents our team from proceeding with this work continuously (move in) will become an overtime charge above this estimate. Client to carry fire and other necessary liability insurance. All costs incurred including 10% interest and attorney fees due to default of payment will be the responsibility of the client and not Quest Landscaping Inc.. Our workers are fully covered by workmans' compensation insurance. Notes: 1. Labor based upon non -union wages (open shop) during regular hours, Monday through Friday, unless negotiated otherwise. 2. Grade to be received plus or minus 1/10 of one foot free of debris. 3. Water and electrical meters supplied and installed by others. 4. Electrical connection to irrigation controller by developer. S. Sleeving is to be installed prior to installation of pavement, no cutting, demolition or patching is included. 6. Repairs and relocations not included in this contract. 7. All rock and spoils will be accumulated at one location on site. Haul, disposal and equipment for moving will be at additional cost. 8. This contract proposal is valid for (30) thirty days from date. 9. No demo by QUEST LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION, INC. all demo by others. 10. Plant material subject to availability at time of procurement. 11. Landscape lighting by developer. TOTAL PROPOSAL: $50,500.00 -BALANCE DUE UPON PROGRESS PAYMENTS AS PER PERCENTAGE OF WORK COMPLETED. -INVOICES OVER 30 DAYS OLD SUBJECT TO 10% INTEREST CHARGE PER ANNUM. Exclusions: Export of soil, cross rip, water and electrical meters, survey, inspection, soil testing, site furnishings, drainage, rough grading, slope stabilization, copper piping, repair of damages due to rain, wind, erosion, slope failure, vandalism, or acts of God. Thank you for allowing us to present you with this landscape proposal, should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Quest Landscape Construction, ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL: DATE: The above prices, specification and conditions are satisfactory and hereby accepted. You are authorized to proceed with the work as specified. .i n33 DESERT`'CENERY A Landscape A Maintenance Company 83-921 Hopi Ai enne. Indio, CA 92201 Phone # 760-347-4747 i 1E April 24,2002 Wilson & Johnson Commercial Real Estate 45-445 Portola Avenue Suite 5 Pahn Desert, G%L 92260 RE: Landscape Installation Q Tampico Plaza, La Quinta CA SCOPE OF WORK: Installation of Landscape plans drawn by Ray Martin and presented to Wilson & Johnson for their review. Estimated start date: To be determined. Change orders, additions and plan revisions will be an additional charge to this proposal. PROJECT SHRUBS" ES 22 15 Gallon Chamaerops humilis 13 6 inch Fouqueria splenderis 125 5 Gallon Shrubs 110 1 Gallon Lantana 25 1 Gallon Baileya TOTAL SHRUBS $5,650.00 PROJECT TREES Relocate 12 30"-35" Filifera & Robusta Palms Install 6 30"--35" Phoenix Dactylifera TOTAL TREES $19,700.00 PROJECT IRRN;ATION 320 shrub drip emitters 58 deep well tree bubblers removal of existing sprinkler system installation of drip system TOTAL IRRIGATION $5,975.00 034 BID PAGE 2 PROJECT 1HIS1 Weed preventor 40 tons 1 to 3" salt river cabo 100 tons brimstone decomposed granite 50 1" to 4" boulders removal of existing turf grading of dirt removal of existing landscape Msc. materials TOTAL MSC. $17,225.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST 548,550.00 All work to be completed in a work like manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written change order and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon accidents, weather, or delays beyond our control. Contractor is not responsible for delays caused by other contractors. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this bid, which is good for 30 days. Date John De La Torre DESERT SCENERY Date Authorized Signature n35 LANDSCAPE April 23, 2002 Wilson 8I )ohnson ATTN: John RE: Park View Plaza ESTIMATE ONLY MATERIALS LANDSCAPE ITEM SIZE QTY Relocate Filifera 8z Robusta Palms 30'-35' 12 Phoenix Dactylifera 30'-35' 6 Chamaerops humilis 15 gallon 22 Fouqueria splendens 6' 13 Miscellaneous Shrubs 5 gallon 155 Lantana M. (yellow) 1 gallon 125 Baileya M. 1 gallon 25 MISCELLANEOUS: Salt River Cobble 4" minus 40 TONS Weed Barrier 2,600 SIFT Decomposed Granite 60 TONS Boulders (Cresta) 3'-4' 13 2'-3' 27 2'-2' 7 Demolition (Existing Turf) L.S. Construct Bennis (24" Average) L.S. Fine Grade 2,600 SFT LANDSCAPE TOTAL $45,91 1.00 This is an estimate only and is not intended as a formal proposal and in no way should be construed as a frm quote. NOTE: Maintenance is not included in this estimate. It is recommended that a contingency of between $1,500 and $2,000 be incorporated into your budget to repair and/or replace existing light fixtures. Incorporated 1995 Post Office B. 1300 La Ounce, California 92253-1300 Tel 7601771-5457 Fez 7601771-3559 Lic. xC-27-497293 ill on -trJ,:j Wilson 8T Johnson Park View Plaza — Estimate Only 4/23/02 page 2 MATERIALS IRRIGATION ITEM SIZE QTY Palle Bubbler 1404 58 Deep Water Tubes 3' 58 Shrub Emitters EMT 2-0 318 Remove Existing Laterals L.S. Retro-fit Existing Valves L.S. IRRIGATION TOTAL $ 7,974.00 This is an estimate only and is not intended as a formal proposal and in no way should be construed as a firm quo[e. NOTE: Irrigation mainline, wire, controllers and valves are existing and are not a part of this estimate. Wall renovation, wall boulders, entry signs, and interlocking pavers are not a part of this estimate. Incorporated 1585 Pose Office Box 1300 La Ouinta. Caofornia 92253-1300 Tel 760/771-5457 Fax 760/771-3559 Lic °C-27-497393 WYNDHAM ELECTRIC Estimate Electrical Contractor Lic# 387369 944 Mel Ave. Palm Springs, Ca. 92262 760-220-9442 NAME/ADDRESS La Quinta Village Business Center 45-445 Portola Ave Palm Desert, Ca 760-837-1890 DESCRIPTION Location of work: Rey Preliminary Planting Plan,ByRay Martin Design Tampico Plaza Building Caile Tampico La Quinta, Ca. Electrical Sen ice for the renovation of landscape lighting for new design. per plans dated:1-22-02 Installation of the follonving; A) Outdoor bullet light fixtures with 75 watt par-30 capsulite halogen lamps for new Palm tree locations. B) 26 watt fluorescent flood light fixtures for entn� way signs. (both sides as indicated on plans.) C) Power supply and time clock switching, for light fixtures. D) All labor and matr-' E) Demo of existing'. OTY DATE ESTIMATE NO. 4/19/2002 10807 PROJECT COST I TOTAL 9,269.00 9,268.00 0 IS ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Commercial Property Improvement Program This Commercial Property I rprovement Program Rebate Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of the day of FLJVHMV 2001, by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and LeRoc Partners c/o Charles Dunn Real Estate Services ("Applicant"). WHEREAS, the Agency has approved the Commercial Property Improvement Program ("Program") to encourage and assist property owners and tenants to rehabilitate retail, office, service, and other non-residential buildings/properties in Redevelopment Project Area No. 1. WHEREAS, the Agency has agreed to provide the sum of such payments or reimbursements to or on behalf of the Applicant for eligible improvements under the Program, hereafter referred to as the "Rebate." WHEREAS, the Applicant promises to maintain all improvement in good, attractive condition for five (5) years after execution of this Agreement. WHEREAS, the Applicant understands and agrees that the Agency, the City, and their officers, agents, and employees shall have no responsibility or liability for any failure or inadequacy of performance or defective workmanship or materials. NOW, THEREFORE, in mutual consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and subject to all of the covenants and conditions contained therein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Program Descri tp ion: Under the Program, the Agency will offer rebates Lip to $15,000 for eligible interior and exterior renovations. Upon Agency certification of completed work outlined in Attachment 1, the Applicant will be provided with a Rebate. The amount of the Rebate is specified below. If applicable, the Applicant may receive the Rebate in three (3) equal progress payments. The Applicant will demonstrate achievement for each progress payment. The first payment will occur when construction begins; the second when the project is half complete (as specified in Attachment 2), and; the third upon Agency certification of completed work. .1,; 039 013 2. fiebate Amount: The Rebate provided by the Agency to the Applicant will not exceed 90% of total project cost up to a maximum of $15,000 unless approved otherwise in writing by the Agency. The Applicant is responsible for a 10% match of the total project cost. 3. project Implementation: The Applicant agrees to all applicable improvements specified in Attachment 1 and understands that all said improvements must be started within three (3) months and be completed within one (1) year following execution of this Agreement. Upon the completion of all improvements identified in Attachment 1, the Applicant must submit to the Agency, copies of canceled checks, and detailed paid invoices/receipts, along with a Certificate of Work Completed form detailing the costs involved. Bartered work is not acceptable for Rebate consideration. 4. hdaintenance: By executing this Agreement and accepting the Rebate, the Applicant promises to maintain the subject property in good and attractive condition for five (5) years after execution of this Agreement. This requires that: (1) the appearance of the building exterior shall not be allowed to deteriorate to such reasons as chipped or cracked paint or torn or tattered awnings; (2) the grounds of the subject property shall be kept in proper condition, clean and clear of all weeds and debris, and: (3) the subject property shall be maintained in compliance with all applicable City building and zoning regulations. 5. h3demnification: The Applicant shall: (1) indemnify and hold harmless the Agency, City, and their officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all damages to property, and injuries to or death of any person or persons, and; (2) defend, assure, and save harmless the Agency, City, and their officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, or proceedings of any kind. This may include but not by way of limitation, workers' compensation claims resulting or arising our of the acts, errors, or omission of the Applicant and its contractors, subcontractors, or employees as they pertain to all improvements identified and related thereto in Attachment 1. 014 non IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Agreement is hereby executed as of the date and year first written above. LAQUQUUIIINNNTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY gy; Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director APPLICANT Le —Roo Partners c/o Charles nn Real Estate Services, Inc. G:\MyData\WPDocs\(:PIP\PLAZATAMPICO-ALMOND-CHARLESDUNN\rebate agreement LeRoc 02-07-01.wpd . _, 041015 ten_i ._ci-::ne_1 0:v:°0 v 1d1AHLCJ DUNN l:U.-LArM Commercial Property Improvement Program Application +pplicant Information �Pplica nt Name: Z GC. VA)'E/LS 07-C`'//r1z'CF5 ��Nti i}[ cCSr�3iE Svs. pplicantPhone: Zci- `/)G 3S!! Applicant E-mail: mqc ncyn c EF��2Lf C. CKL fame of Business: —in is r ��Az�fi Aatling Address: 3 VT, 3m>siness Phone: Business Fax: 74 °/ 'roPerty Owner. 3usiness owner. 3roject Information 3usiness Location: Yes: _✓ No: Yes: _ No: Type of Business: &�cc icy C- Project Goals: iEC) °roposed Improvements: 1 it F'OLC(,,3'jLtc4-7-1S-- Fotal Project Cost (please attach cost esfimate): q 7 7 2equested Agency Assistance: �'n, 7 7 ° � Applicant Budget Amount: V 0 , 9 7 J. o�` )escripbon of Applicant Funding Sources: 'roPosed Project Duration: lttachments Two (2) color photographs of the property where improvements wilt be installed Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level) Cost estimates :erti iication Statements the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the following certification must be complet Y the Property owner. declare under penalty and perjury that I am the owner 'operty involved in this application. I acknowledge that only one (1) tenant of the subject prope volved in this application may be awarded program funding in any one (1) given fiscal year. gnature: Date: ie following statement must be completed by the applicant end property owner. ve acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all above information is true and con the best of my/our knowledge and belief. I/we understand that a Building Improvement Reb Ireement must be signed and arrlhorized by the La Ouinta Redevelopment Agency Prior mmenq� any,womk on to ;nature: �, Date: ' 8 oe" Date: '00 SEP 11 An g 02 (3) - 042 � r- 017 ry rf a 1 _ ♦ I 0 IME 0� 019 08/29/2000 12:03 7603272425 PEIERSUd PACE 02 DICK HOURCHI LANDSCAPING P. O. BOX 13U CATHEDRAL CPIY, CA 92M TEL 76s-321-/i7s AUGUST 29„ 2Mf Qvi ty Mmbtmmmcm smrvke Am Ggbn m Rndrl ms P. O. B" fl29s Ptlm Speimp, CA 92M 1. CLOCK 2.M9.M L VALVES 7,01LM 3. SPRT OGLER HEADS 1,000,QQ TOTAL S 10,9r.M 020 046 Desert Club Drive 1L�M, � � r c -rm�rUnTr�� t�U E r f+ E^ nTinvin C II� r- rn r- �rr rm�� D 021 017 FROM : OLRATY MRINTE A*U PHONE NO. : 6197787697 Oct. 27 2000 10:29aM P02 October 27.2000 QUALITY MAINTENANCE. SERVICE GARDENINGIJANTPORIAL 'EAM CLEANrrRF.F. TRIM P. O. BOX 8295 Palm %prin, CA 92M Tel760-322-9319. FAX 760-77117697 FED ID NO. 55940-8666 Wise Maintenance & Construction Co. 53685 Fisenhower I a Quints, CA 92250 BID PROPOSAL TO REPLACk IRR14rj�l' ON 8YFfE.M_ L&QVIN"E&IIIEItICAL CENTER: Replace irrigation values including sprinkler parts. 2. Replace all missing plants. 3. Replace all ground cover plants. 4. Install a new irrigation timer. TOTAL COST: $13,000.00 Gilberto Rodrigf Wkte MainteneneclConatruction Co. ro a yz ofl Date — Date OCT 3 � � I CITY OF LA_QUINiA_ � P vvi-uj cuuu ul izi rii ncv LHnuSGHFI: LILLYfIHN Ib03422545 ■EaMan l9o...._ P. 01 t® 1221BAT 00 109 ,3 82626 BOGART DRIVE Y� INDIO, CA 92201 PHONE:760-775-MO FAX:7604-42-2545 Stbta Contrwtoe'a Ucmnae 0 765318 =0:_eM _ ■1AsII4; PROPOSAL FROPOM No, Wise 10-00 SHM NO, 1of1 a 1045M WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT: Wise Mairthaiance a Construction Co. Pla=a Tarnpoo ADDM" 53086 Elsdnhawer cm.satE La QuInta cnY. STATE La Qui CA O•TE Or a A r P"OK NO T71-1180 AW.4=CT We hereby propose to fumish the Materials and perform the labor necessary for the com lotion of! Plant and TM Replacement Option 1: Option 2: 10 lion Hibisas 10 1 allon Hibiscus 23 on Honeysuckle Vino 23 1 on Honeysuckle Yaves 3 1 lion Bottle Trees 3 1 lon Bottle Trees 1 n Laurel Fig Trees 1 lon Laurel Fig Trees 39allon Oleander 39 1 non Oleander jispanese oteatsier tl 1 Ion Japanew oleandar 1 t Laurel Sumac 1 1 ion Laurel Sumac 11 ton Cariaa 11 Ion Came 3 15itallon Evergreen Peer 3 1 &gallon Evergreen Pear 1 24' box Olive Tree 1 24- box Olive Tres 2 1 Mediterranean Fan Palma 2 t 1on Mediterranean Fan Palms 0 on LaMarka 8 Ibn Lantana 5 flats annual color 5 flats annual color 50 sq It sod 50 ft sod MeterlauLabor: $4,742.00 Material/Labor $6,912.00 • Price for replacement material does not include irrigation repair due to stating clock unable to function manually. A new dock needs to be installed prior to evaluation of Orlastione em, Rain Blyd MC-22 Clock and Pedestal — MateAaYLabor: $1,307.00 Mainrtertatice • W0.00► month • Includes minor irrigation repairs, trimming of bushes and bees. pick up trash and dehris, hauling of landlicaps debrls. • Does not include: annual color, palm tme trimming, or overseeding sod. Valve replacement at addhlonal cosL An material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawirrge and spec f ationa submitted for above work and completed In a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of TBD --------------- Dollars (t wtM payments to be made as follows: TBD M4 eer•mn a ft MkO r,an •bow eeaKse.I V1,h •m• Respectfully submitted mw.e a sore a.•r war coati am. w •a e•m•. e, ell tXep••.lr��•n M••Em•e. Yq•wne�O .»•v.• w•�.•.....ed..m., a w•,• n•r•ro w a• wa Note - This mey withdrawn by us if not accepted within ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and oondMona are satisfactory and ate hereby accepted. You are authortzed to do the work as specified. Payments will be made as outlined above. SignaMe - (_ 023 61 Date svn m" — i . 04� "MG r-Kt aaLtSLANuaGAPINGINC 760 345 1297 Ornnonn I. Ptge Mo. 01 CO 01 Peoee P.02 I (760) 34"W :1S FAX (760) 345.129740-25o G/LLINDO COURTESERLic. ER No. 737763 BERMUDA DUNES, CA 92203 Ia14 no.mrswrnoso -gr f+u un: Wise Maintenance and Construction Co. 760 771-I180 17ctober0 Y000 51 r AnY( 53-685 Eisenhower Dr. Plaza Tampico an. S,.TE .m rr COOL La Quints, CA 92253 IDD lorJYo+ La Quints, CA 92253 ..u«YYc, \ o.n v rya,s Fax 0 (760) 564-7412 xa f+ofE / Or f [op oe[ MrlDY to lurmM matenf� afo 40or — can,PMm m attoroence +.tn roedfofont DMew, b, th tun ot. iff iiiffiiff fff iifffififflfifff4lf P.Y�em b M mep tl bvfn. •f:ff!lfrflfffiiffff!!!fl oeeen(f OPEN _I 11Y in.�n.l O eW.�feftl 9 M H S �! Y M C 0. MWN! n ..pIVI.N.. m.nr,e� a®610 tl f1YEVC enC•[�f MY ilbn.T b M.,T XOm feF�ieonf P r ` 'V •en way. e.e� ena .w.. m. ea.,vw Y .y�w�h fawgn ies� w+ea .w- ' dw b f.wn e.rb�a w cbn,b 0.,�• io wY W. tmneo be rnw rnAe.erY vopo3Y mlY W ,nonr,cf OW, .enen w ti.Y m..na M wv.anf.• C� fn,.vs ue 1 not .e+'AM.a lamm 30 --do" we P« Yueme mlcer', „ ewP absw Relandscaping Plaza Tampico East side only as indicated un plans. NOTE: Due to so many incomplete visible areas, we can only do this project on a time and material basis (Or re -do it all new). List Cost of Labor and Material are listed below: I. Labor Cost @ $22.50 per/hour 2. 5 Gallon Plants @ $12.50 per/plant 3. 1 Gallon Plants @ $9.00 per/plant 4. 24" Box Trees @ $205.00 each S. Sod @ $.4D per/sq/ft. 6. Sprinkler System - Invoice plus 102 OCT 3 2000 Arrrptanrr of Proposal _the DweWcea,,oecAc,bonf z4 City of La Quinta La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Commercial Property Improvement Program For purposes of the CPIP application by and between LeRoc Partners c/o Charles Dunn Real Estate Services, Inc. and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, the following shall be deemed the "half complete" milestone in order for the Applicant to request/receive 1 /3 of the total funding to be paid by Agency: The "half complete" point as described in Section 1 of the Agreement ("Project Description") shall be that point at which the Applicant completes and submits bills for the following: (1) Time Clock replacement; (2) Completion of irrigation work. G:\MyData\WPDocs\(:PIP\PLAZATAMPICO-ALMOND-CHARLESDUNN\definition of half -complete attachment 2 02-07-01 .wpd 051 ATTACHMENT 3 FUNDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS: This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non- conforming uses (i.e. signs), and other improvements that enhance the general appearance of the subject property. 50 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS: This may include the reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies, exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the entrance and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be considered. 25 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT: Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to customers, neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or the expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area. 10 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score OTHER: This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational opportunities. 10 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score APPLICANT MATCHING FUNDS: Applicants may receive up to 5 points for exceeding the required 10% applicant funding match. Scale 0-5 points x Category Weight = weighted score Total of all weighted scores: divide by 10 = (FINAL SCORE) (70 points required to receive funding) 026 052 BI #D ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: MAY 3, 2002 2002-013 DENISE DU BARRY-HAY FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR LANDSCAPE/HANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH SIDE OF CALLE TAMPICO NEAR DESERT CLUB DRIVE, 78-150 CALLE TAMPICO The property owner, Denise Du Barry -Hay, has submitted an application under the Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking funding to install new hardscape and upgrade the landscaping. Ms. Du Barry -Hay owns one of the two buildings in this plaza; the other building has a separate owner. However, both owners are submitting CPIP applications to upgrade the hardscape and landscaping located in the common areas. The two applicants plan on sharing the cost of the landscape improvements, with both contributing CPIP funds to the project. The proposed hardscape improvements consist of removing the existing island, light standard and existing concrete from the main driveway located along Calle Tampico and replacing it with interlocking pavers; the installation of three monument signs - one on each side of the driveway and one at the driveway located on the east side of the property; the installation of curb and gutter per City standards along the main driveway; and the removal of several portions of the existing block wall to be filled in with boulder "clusters" for decorative purposes. The applicant has provided bids for the hardscape work as follows: 1. Ray Duff Masonry - $27,260 2. Demo Unlimited, Inc. (demolition only) - $12,420 3. Workhorse - $60,973 The proposed landscape improvements consist of upgrading the irrigation system, relocating existing palms to form decorative "groupings," removing the existing turf areas; installation of decomposed granite, salt river cobble, and boulders; installation of plants, trees, and shrubs; and the installation of landscape lighting. The goal of the landscape improvements is to upgrade the landscaping to bring it more in line with what is being done throughout the City. The applicant has provided bids for the - n53 landscape work as follows: 1. Quest Landscape Construction - $50,500 2. Desert Scenery - $48,550 3. Mark Logan Landscape - $53,885 4. Wyndham Electric (landscape lighting only) - $9,268 The total project cost for both hardscape and landscape will range from $70,238 to $124,126. The applicant is requesting the maximum CPIP award of $15,000, and will more than exceed the required 10% match of $1,500. These two properties received CPIP funding for landscaping in the recent past under the former owner. (There was one owner of both properties.) On December 20, 2000, the ALRC approved an application submitted by the previous owner to improve and expand the landscape irrigation system including an irrigation controller, and the installation of plant material. The work was completed in May 2001, and the applicant received payment in the amount of $15,000. The buildings were sold shortly thereafter; however, the new owners believe that the first landscaping job was poorly executed because much of the plant material has died or is not thriving. If both of today's CPIP requests are funded, these properties will have received a total of $45,000 in CPIP funding in less than one year It should be noted that there are no regulations within the CPIP that preclude the award of funding to properties in succeeding years. The agreement signed last year by the previous owner, however, obligated him to maintain property improvements for a period of five years. (See Attachment 2) Accordingly, staff believes that the aesthetics of the proposed project should be evaluated pursuant to improvements upon the property as if the original improvements had been maintained. The proposed improvements will expand upon the previously funded project by upgrading the existing sprinkler -based irrigation system to a drip system; removing turf and replacing it with a desert -theme landscape palette; by the addition of monument signs and pavers in the main driveway; and by the addition of landscape lighting. Therefore, this proposed project goes beyond the parameters of the project approved and funded a year ago. If this project is approved, the actual details of the financing, subject to the program limitations, will be negotiated through an agreement entered into by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and the applicant. As with other applications, a Funding Criteria worksheet is attached to this staff report (Attachment 3) to facilitate scoring of the project. If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After receiving 054 all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into an agreement with the applicant. The applicant's representative has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that she will no be able to attend the May 3, 2002 ALRC meeting. However, Scott Wilson will be present to answer questions regarding this project. Prepared by: Debbie Powell, Management Analyst City Manager's Office Attachments: 1. CPIP application: Scott Wilson 2. Agreement with Previous Owner 3. Funding Criteria worksheet PROGRAM STEPS (CONT.) be based on the lowest bid amount(s). The applicant may choose any licensed contractor, but the funding award will be based on the lowest bid. 6. If applicable, an architect or design professional will prepare construction drawings. 7. The applicant will obtain three (3) contractor bids. All contractors must be licensed by the State and have a business license with the City of La Quinta. Bids need only be obtained up to the Program limits (i.e. $15,000). For example, if the improvemenUconstruction costs are $100,000, the applicant does not need to get three (3) bids for every component or for the total amount. However, if the applicant is seeping $15,000, then three (3) bids must be obtained totaling at least $16,500 ($15,000 plus 10% match of $1,500) for that component being funded by the Program. 8. The applicant will submit the construction bids and proof of contractor insurance to Agency staff. 9. The Agency and applicant will sign a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement (Rebate Agreement) outlining the work to be completed. No work shall commence (other than the initial design activities) until the applicant submits an executed Rebate Agreement and the applicant obtains all applicable building permits. 10. The applicant, or the contractor, will obtain all applicable building permits. 11. The applicant is responsible for project implementation. Construction must start within ninety (90) days from obtaining building permits and be completed within one (1) year after the execution of the Debate Agreement. 12. The loan may be funded in three equal payments at the applicant's request. Payment of 33% of the total amount will be made when construction commences. Second payment of 33% of the total amount will occur when the project is 50% complete (the Rebate Agreement will describe this milestone). The third payment will be made upon project completion and verification of the items presented in #13 and #14 below. It the applicant does not choose the three equal payment plan, the payment will be made upon project completion and verification of the items presented in #13 and #14 below. 13, Upon completion, the applicant must submit photos of the finished project and proof of vendor payment and contractor lien releases. Agency staff will then visit the site to certify project completion within (15) days after receiving these materials from the .applicant. 14. The applicant will receive the final progress payment upon verification of project completion. This will occur within fifteen (15) days after the site visit and certification of vendor payments and construction lien releases. For new construction, final progress payments will not be made until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the City and the business is open to the public. 15. Successful applicants must comply with all local, Stale, and Federal laws, including payment of any prevailing wages as applicable and required by law. ATTACHMENT La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Commercial Property Improvement Program Application Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Applicant Information Applicant Name: 3le'l;Se- Dk 13,2 [.�e Applicant Phone: 7'7'7-e't-7 Applicant E-Mail: Name of Business: ' Mailing Address: W-/40 61lems 7a.{�,`c� („��l ,.2f,� cif- QzZ�3 1 Business Phone: (?&')7-77,-aZt-7 r Business Fax Property Owner. Yes: ✓ No: Business Owner: Yes: No: Project Information Business Location: ??-/FO Cabe 74. r, c0 Type of Business: Project Goals:-4�riiS�'<!!K�' r'C'KO✓xfb�r Proposed Improvements: NLW r(se .r-f 44e* <4lsc -7' Total Project Cost (please attach cost estimate): Requested Agency Assistance: � lS; 0w Applicant Match: -01 �J-e U Description of Applicant Funding Sources. _ LY%!� �r 44- Cl-' L. Proposed Project Duration: Attachments Two (2) color photographs of the property where improvements will be installed Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level) • Cost estimates Certification Statements If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the following certification must be completed by the property owner: I, �Jc'rvSL 71g �r ^iv !�`�, declare under penalty and perjury that I am the owner of property involved in this application. I acknowledge that only one (1) tenant of the subject property invol in this applicapit)mai awarded Lramnding in any one (1) given fiscal year.Signature: Date:The following statement must be completed by e appropertyowner: Irwe acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all above information is We and correct to the best of mylour knowledge and belief. Ilwe understand that a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement must be signed and authorized by. La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Rdor to co m a g aryV work lect. Signature: Dad: Signature: Date: Please return the completed application, with required attachments, to: City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency C/o Maria Casillas 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 05� 003 Application Back -Up Materials See CPIP 2002-012 n5`' See CPIP 2002-012 ATTACHMENT 2 05,5 ATTACHMENT 3 FUNDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS: This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non- conforming uses (i,e. signs), and other improvements that enhance the general appearance of the subject property. Scale 0-10 points x 50 Category Weight = weighted score SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS: This may include the reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies, exterior wall finishes, doors and windows decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the entrance and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be considered. Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT: Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to customers, neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or the expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area. Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score OTHER: This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational opportunities. Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score APPLICANT MATCHING FUNDS: Applicants may receive up to 5 points for exceeding the required 10% applicant funding match. Scale 0-5 points x: Category Weight = weighted score Total of all weighted scores: divide by 10 = (FINAL SCORE) (70 points required to receive funding) ©SQ� L i N 4 MWA P F, NMI#' ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: MAY 1, 2002 CASE NOS: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-731, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-732, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-733 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO RESCIND MINUTE MOTIONS 2002-011, 2002-013, 2002-014 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ABOVE -NOTED CASES TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THE ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2002 The Committee at its meeting of April 3, 2002, approved the three above -noted cases. Staff is requesting the Minute Motions approving these cases be set aside based upon there being a lack of a quorum at the meeting; one member was absent and one member resides within 500 feet of the projects. RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 2002-013, and 2002-014. setting aside Minute Motions 2002-01 1, G:\W PDOCS\ARLC\Stf RptRecinding.wpd