Loading...
2002 08 07 ALRC�w�U"MtQ.c �FM OF TNF O ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California AUGUST 7, 2002 10:00 A.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2002-032 I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call II. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. , Approval of the Minutes for July 3, 2002. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-748 Applicant ................ James Riutcel/Dutch Parent Location ................. East of Washington Street between Fred Waring Drive and Darby Road. Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for a self storage facility Action .................... Minute Motion 2002- ALRC/AGENDA ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE B. Item ....................... SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-051, AMENDMENT #1 AND VILLAGE USE PERMIT 2001-007, AMENDMENT #1 Applicant ................ Cameo Homes (Victor J. Mahony) Location ................. North of Calle Tampico and east of (Eisenhower Drive. Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for a multi -storied 200 unit apartment complex and two commercial buildings on 12 acres in a Village Commercial District. Action .................... Minute Motion 2002- C. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-702, AMENDMENT #1 Applicant ................ La Quinta Congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses Location ................. East side of Dune Palms Road, south of Westward Ho Drive, across from La Quinta High School. Request .................. Review of architectural plans for a second church building. Action .................... Minute Motion 2002- D. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-749 Applicant ................ David F. Hauck/Ponderosa Homes Location ................. Northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for three residential plans to be constructed in Tract 29323. Action .................... Minute Motion 2002- E. Item ....................... COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2002-018 Applicant ................ Francisca & Augustin Martinez Location ................. 78-100 Calle Tampico, northeast corner of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas Request .................. Funding request for exterior improvements Action .................... Minute Motion 2002- VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS Vlll. ADJOURNMENT ALRC/AGENDA .l,,f.0 U � 002 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 3, 2002 CALL TO ORDER '10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:06 a.m. by Principal Planner Stan Sawa who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, and David Thorns. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Bobbitt/Thoms to excuse Committee Member Cunningham. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Management Analyst Debbie Powell, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Martin Magana, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Principal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of June 5, 2002. Commissioner Thorns noted some minor changes. There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to approve the Minutes as corrected. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2002-746; a request of Toll Bros./Forrest Haag for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a gatehouse, clubhouse, and spa facility located at the northeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52. 1. Associate Planner Martin project and introduced Mr. on the project. Magana gave an explanation of the Forrest Haag who gave a presentation G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\7-3-02.wpd 1 "J.'i 1i 003 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 3, 2002 2. Committee Member Thoms asked what type of citrus was planned for the area around the gatehouse. Mr. Haag explained they are typically grapefruit trees as they are durable. Commissioner Thoms asked what the ground surface would be under the palms and citrus. Mr. Haag stated it was turf to accent the trees. Committee Member Thoms asked what material would be used for the finish on the front of the building. Mr. Haag stated it would be smooth white stucco troll with barrel or "S" the for the roof. Committee Member Thoms complimented the project. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if they could use a material that would require less maintenance than the wood on the doors to the gatehouse. Mr. Haag stated they would look at the issue and see what alternative materials could be used. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if purposely left off overhangs for the guardhouse and clubhouse. Mr. Haag stated that for consistency of architecture and maintenance issues they chose not to have them. Committee Member Bobbitt complimented the architecture on the buildings and asked that they use good quality palm trees with no constrictions or stress to avoid crown drops. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-028 recommending approval of Site Developrrient Permit 2002-746, subject to the conditions as submitted and amended: A. Healthy good quality palm trees Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2002-740; a request of Mark Carpenter/Dutch Parent/The Casey Group Architects for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a 217 unit apartment complex located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive. 1. Associate Planner Martin Magana explained the project and introduced Mr. Paul Casey, architect for the project, who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the railings would be wood. Mr. Paul Casey stated no, they would be made of fiberglass and almond in color to match the stucco. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there was a detailed drawing on the carports. Mr. Casey C,:\WPDOCS\ARLC\7-3-02.wpd 2 q-4- ( I O 7 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 3, 2002 stated they were flat steel structure, almond in colon and work best in this type of environment. Mr. Carpenter stated the slanted roofs take away from the building design. 3. Committee Member Thorns asked what would be planted in the landscape area between the perimeter wall and the carport structure. Mr. Mike Horton, landscape architect, stated they intend to use a drier, more drought tolerant plant material around the edge. Mr. Casey stated the curb is the car stop. Mr. Horton stated the turf and plant material would be held back from the area where the cars abut. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the size of the area where the shade trees are in the parking area. Mr. Horton stated they would be six feet. Committee Member Bobbitt stated they may not be able to obtain the 50% shade coverage as required by the City because of the lack of tree growth, but the trees will be healthier due to the size of the islands. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the developer would be having the landscape architect make a final inspection. Mr. Carpenter stated there would be a final inspection. Discussion followed regarding the gradling of the retention basin. 5. Committee Member Thorns asked about the cris-cross trellis on the hand railings of the building's end elevations. Mr. Casey stated they would be solid and the pattern is added to the stucco. The end walls would be solid. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the window popouts. Mr. Casey explained they will be stucco based with acrylic coating, pillions. 7. Committee Member Thorns asked about the architecture of the front elevation where there is a shed roof and the rear there is a gable. Mr. Casey stated it is to create interest. Committee Member Thorns questioned the colors being used. Mr. Casey explained how the color was being used to break up the building and add charm. Committee Member Thorns asked about the grade change where a portion of the building is buried. Mr. Casey explained the patio slab is essentially flush with the normal grade, but they berm up around the building with a concrete wall that goes up approximately three feet to help screen the height of the building. G:\WPDOCS\ARI,C\7-3-02.wpd 3 �" 11 o Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 3, 2002 8. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the applicant was aware that the vines proposed would stick to the buildings and can be a maintenance problem. Mr. Horton stated they may use a different species. 9. Committee Member Thorns asked what the material was proposed for the perimeter wall. Mr. Horton slump stone with a slurry finish. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 029 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002- 740, as requested. Unanimously approved. C. Site Development Permit 2002-747; a request of Peter Jacobs Homes, Inc./BBG Architects for review of architectural plans for two single story prototype house plans located at the west side of Turnberry Way and south of Brown Deer Park within the Norman Course Principal Planner Stan Sawa introduced Mr. Peter Jacobs who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked who would be maintaining the landscape area. Mr. Jacobs explained the front would be maintained by the homeowners' association (HOA) and the rear by the property owner. Committee Member Bobbitt asked that all the roof lines not be the same. Mr. Jacobs stated they would propose to use hip and gable roofs to create different designs. 3. Committee Member Thorns stated he does not like windows on garage doors. Mr. Jacobs stated they would have an architectural element, but no windows and wood would not be used. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 030 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 747, subject to the conditions as submitted. Unanimously approved. A. No windows in the garage doors. G:AWPDOCSVARLCA7-3-02.wpd 4 � �1�i' 0 0 F Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 3, 2002 D. Site Development Permit 2002-745; a request of Marvin Investments/SGPC Architecture Planning, for review of architectural and landscaping plans for Phase 1 of Old Town La Quinta, located northeast corner of Desert Club Drive and Avenida La Fonda. 1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa explained the project and introduced the architect, Mr. Michael Cather of SGPC Architecture and Planning and Jose Estrada, Herman & Associates, landscape architect for the project gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern that the tower elements might have to be lowered to meet the height restrictions. He asked where the trash storage and the mechanical equipment would be located. Mr. Cather stated the buildings would be kept within the height restrictions. It is their intent to keep them down to a pedestrian scale. In regard to the trash enclosures, they are still looking at potential sites. These are four-sided buildings which makes it very difficult to site them. In regard to the mechanical equipment, they would be using mansards and/or parapets that would shield the equipment. 3. Committee Member Thorns stated the architecture and detailing are excellent, but the site plan for the entire project is lacking. There is no core to the site. There are several block buildings and their architecture is excellent. This is a very important site to the City and he doesn't see the imagination in the site plan. The only "people" place is the plaza area. He doesn't see it becoming a .well used site" for the center of the City. Mr. Cather stated the focal point is the mainstreet for pedestrian traffic and still introduce the vehicular method of travel. They would review the site plan with the Committee's comments in mind. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he wanted to be sure the tree wells were large enough for the trees to grow. He concurs there needs to be a civic center to draw the project together. Discussion followed as to whether or not the site plan could be brought back to the Committee for review. It was suggested the Committee have an opportunity to review the architecture and landscaping in appropriate specific plans before being submitted to the Planning Commission to allow them input before; it reaches this stage in the design process. G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\7-3-02.wpd 5 . 1-� i; 007 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 3, 2002 5. Committee Member Thorns asked that his statements be entered into the record that the site plan does not meet, what he thinks, should be the theme for the area. It needs more detail to bring some life to the site. Landscaping should be a significant part of the planning process. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 031 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 745, subject to the conditions as submitted with comments noted on the site plan. Unanimously approved. E. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-017; a request of David Chapman/Ciro's Restaurant for funding of electrical and parking improvements for the property located at 78-110 Calle Estado. 1. Management Analyst Debbie Powell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department and introduced Mr. John Owens, representing the owner for the project gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated there have not been a lot of requests for utility improvements, and he is not sure it is appropriate to spend CPIP funds on utility improvements. CPIP Guidelines are not clearly defined regarding this type of request. Staff agreed it generally has been for aesthetics. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he could approve a portion for the lighting, but not the entire amount for electrical work. He would like to have a site plan for the lighting work proposed showing the fixture styles. In addition, he would request the lighting be separated from the utility improvements. 3. Committee Member Thorns agreed. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to continue CPIP 2002-017, to the meeting of August 7, 2002. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None G:\WPDOCS\.A ,C\7-3-02.wpd 6 008 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 3, 2002 VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: A. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that during his reappointment interview he was asked some very poignant questions by Council regarding the median landscaping. They made a suggestion that the Committee be more involved in the conceptual design work for projects. He would like to request a better definition of what the Committee should be reviewing. VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thorns to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on August 7, 2002. This meeting was adjourned at 12:07 p.m. on July 3, 2002. Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\7-3-02.wpd 7 Tmt 4 4 QK&M ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 7, 2002 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-748 APPLICANT: JAMES RIUTCEL/DUTCH PARENT ARCHITECT: VALLI ARCHITECT REQUEST: ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A :± 100,000 SELF STORAGE FACILITY ON A 4.23 ACRE LOT. LOCATION: EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET BETWEEN FRED WARING DRIVE AND DARBY ROAD. Honorable Chairman and Members of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee, please review this proposal and prepare your comments for discussion at the meeting. Transmitted by: Martin Magan , Associate Planner P:\Martin\Dutch Parent II\ALRCStfrpt.wpd I ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 7, 2002 CASE NO: SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-051 AMENDMENT #1 AND VILLAGE USE PERMIT 2001-007 AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT: CAMEO HOMES (VICTOR J. MAHONY) REQUEST: ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW OF A MULTISTORIED 200-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AND TWO COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ON 12±ACRES IN A VILLAGE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATION: 630± FEET NORTH OF CALLE TAMPICO AND EAST OF EISENHOWER DRIVE ARCHITECT: KTGY GROUP, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: FORREST K. HAAG, ASLA, INC. ENGINEER: M.D.S. CONSULTING (CHRIS BERGH) Honorable Chairman and Members of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee, please prepare your comments on this proposal for discussion at the Attachments Architectural Booklets (Commission members only) G:ALRC VUP007C=eo greg.wpd ^'-`'j U 011 Taf 4 XP 49mm ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 7, 2002 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-702, AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT: LA QUINTA CONGREGATIONS OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES ENGINEER: JOHN HACKER AND ASSOCIATES REQUEST: ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR SECOND CHURCH BUILDING LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF DUNE PALMS ROAD, SOUTH OF WESTWARD HO DRIVE, ACROSS FROM LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL (Please prepare your comments on this proposal for discussion at the next ALRC meeting.) This is the second building proposed for the site. The first hall, along with the site design, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 2001. The first hall is located at the front of the property near Dune Palms Road. Listed below are the staff -identified issues relating to, or affecting the architectural aspects of the project: 1. This hall is slightly different in architectural design from the fiirst hall, as requested by the Community Development Department (see attachment). 2. Roof tile is proposed to match the first hall, with plaster and trim colors slightly different. Transmitted by: `5-ta- Stan Sawa, Principal Planner 012 P:\STAN\sdp 2001-702 alrc rpt jehovahs.wpd WIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: AUGUST 7, 2002 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-749 APPLICANT: DAVID F. HAUCK/PONDEROSA HOMES ARCHITECT: JBZ ARCHITECTURE REQUEST: REVIEW OF PROTOTYPE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THREE RESIDENTIAL PLANS, TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN TRACT 29323 LOCATION: N/W/C FRED WARING AND JEFFERSON STREET (SEE ATTACHED VICINITY MAP) Please review the attached information in preparation for the August 7 ALRC meeting. These three plans will be constructed on 104 lots being purchased by the Applicant, which are located on the far west side of the tract. The architecture and landscape criteria for all plans are attached. The plans as proposed meet all setback and other zoning requirements, as well as related tract conditions of TT 29323, with the exception of Plan 3, which includes an attached rear patio cover shown as set back 18 feet from rear property line. This element must maintain a 20 foot setback. No other conditions are recommended for the unit or landscape plans. Transmitted by: Wallace Nesbit, Associate Planner C:\Wrkgrp\A LR Csd p 749. wpd .a^J (l 013 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT REQUEST: LOCATION BACKGROUND: AUGUST 7, 2002 2002-018 FRANCISCA & AUGUSTIN MARTINEZ LA QUINTA MEAT MARKET FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 78-100 CALLE TAMPICO, NORTHEAST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO ANDAVENIDA BERMUDAS Francisca and Augustin Martinez own the building located at 78-100 Calle Tampico, known as the La Quinta (or "Augie's") Meat Market. The building was constructed in the mid-1990's. The applicants plan to eventually convert the market into a restaurant. They have submitted an application (Attachment 1) under the Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking funding assistance for exterior improvements. Specifically, the improvements include the installation of a 20' x 15' covered patio with a wood lattice roof at the rear of the building. A 4' high stucco wall would be constructed around the patio. The patio would accommodate diners, and would be visible from Avenida Bermudas. The applicant is also proposing to construct a 4' high slump block wall around the south and west sides of the building, adjacent to the sidewalk. This would shield some of the exposed utilities (e.g., electric meters, water meter, etc.) from view. Two 20' swing gates would be installed attached to the wall to control vehicular access to the driveways, as well as twelve pillars with lights along the wall. Four new windows (3' x 3') would be installed - two facing Calle Tampico and two facing the parking lot. In addition, the small door facing Calle Tampico and the existing door facing the parking lot would be removed and replaced with 40" entrance doors. The installation of windows and larger doors meets the CPIP design guidelines of "increasing and/or opening up window areas to expose interiors." Although not included in the attached estimates, the applicant has indicated that the building and new walls will be painted a light peach color. The applicant is seeking $15,000 in CPIP funding. Estimates range from $17,000 to $24,000; therefore, the applicant will be providing more than the required 10% match. A Funding Criteria worksheet is included as Attachment 2 to facilitate scoring of this project. If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After receiving all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into a loan program agreement with the applicant. Mr. Martinez has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that he will be present at the August 7, 2002 meeting. Prepared by: yDebbie Powell, Management Analyst City Manager's Office Attachments: 1. CPIP Application: Martinez, La Quinta Meat Market 2. Funding Criteria Worksheet 1-;'6 5a Page No. of Pages PHONE DATE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: NAME .r•� t JOB NAME t• STREET STREET �� lC6 CITY CITY STATE � 1 STATE We hereby submit specifications and estimate for: . 0.. "i-o�oa ao x 1 5 o•cl.di-L%�o.t �. C aCLS 2 •' u �c�f k r Ir ` J C^YL c�Uii dC7tU ZL���, l • Ct t-t Ac%. i at ,lrl cl c-6ci "o�Lcf] 02 - Pt 1_141a We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials in complete accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of dollars (5 0c.a. j with payment to be made as follows: All material is Guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner scording to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and w_ become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements we contingent upon strikes, accident or delays beyond our control. This proposal is subje ',o acceptance within days and is void thereafter at the option of the undersigned. Authorized ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the •ork as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. ACCEPTED: Signature: Date: Signature: F Fe e e� R P 0 $off (ot 37 0 M 9S PROPOSAL '?/>o- 64(-9I/�I '7 Z i - c z- Page No. of Pages PHONE DATE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: NAME JOB NAME STRE STREET CITY CITY TATE �c STATE Ca I VL We hereby submit specifications and estimate for: t , at+ aC ecs tc,- o z d X 15 J„ w' X 37 3. H, �9,)c�atCas rR ( S+0 C<..O W C,- I � Qt,O U.N �0. virJ 5" V 1,5k-r C r1 13 P lJ 1 OC 16 1ni0.1 {. a 20 -1 vl a sz'ICe �1' o ri- 5/ h ist1 AIC'uL0IF- sw Cs1Ljw.c bioc-` Ptt\ee--S Cl--I)- �, tnsS�Ftilj CL'15-3v3o V.1 t n�c�o'N5'-�a�� �����ya'vJio�� aoo2s ' C) L) r w A G--A It s aNt iZs'"k-i'g III We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials in complete accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of dollars with payment to be made as follows: All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accident or delays beyond our control. This proposal is subject to acceptance within _ days and is void thereafter at the option of the undersigned. Authorized ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified Payment will be made as outlined above. ACCEPTED: Signature: Date: Siunamre:_ 7 e E Z Contractors Forms FORM NO. U n((��0-1 APAA "' t ' tf 1 j `i PROPOSAL. qf,4—'75'4K `7 — i. G ` C Pa,,e No. of Pages PHONE GATE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: NAME t, JOB NAME \ \Y1 \ U C STREET —. STREET M a c a CITYjj�t CITY TATE STATE We hereby submit specifications and estimate for: , "t t.t� ,D.,Y.JxG4�i:�.`'r x w ( tri..,I to—A.[5— y`L _ i C 1 We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials in complete accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of dollars ($ 2-� CtCO ) with payment to be made as follows-: All material is guaranteed to be as 'specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner scordin to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders;, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All a, eements are contingent upon strikes, accident or delays beyond our control. This proposal is subject to acceptance within --days and is void thereafter at the option of the undersigned. Authorized Signatu ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. ACCEPTED: C EZ Conrraaors Forms FORM NO EZ I10 1 APRA X100 .. .'i _' :.1C. I ll;': a i 1: .:^. t .te'✓:aR.l-<C ... �w.�.. .; aa, GAT ��®cK WA L�- qR-1nn C,4L'Li TAKPi@9 PLOT PLAN VARkiug l.oi 01CI RATIO INSTALLATION LEDGER SECURED WITH 3/8" X �o/ gpprgi ® LAG BOLTS LEDGER a,)K I Q .. . it �x�b I oY4 R.i1��15 RAFTERS / LAG BOLTS STRAP q • I.pTTICE-� (2� lbd.NAI.S. %� KAIM . EACK31bt_O �o5T REST ill POST \ !� b:avt' PLATE. I ° ROUND 8 LEVEL CONCRETE BOLTS ARE _ I o i S L. AB TO POST. TO SECURE STRAP BELOW GRADE LEVEL .I .�� c12C�� !3L6Ck WALL GF C. M.U. P I L L A R S 021 10' AFAXk Yb -� fl CG �2c OYF;YZ 'Y\ANf) Ic111 f -_� c c FOOTINGS AND SCAB. _ _ E�-E"TIO - - - -- -_ A 1 VA' 02� 025 02F ,.0 �; 02 a.�1U 02F