2002 09 04 ALRC/�T
La
aurw
cFb OF TNF'9
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the
La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
SEPTEMBER 4, 2002
10:00 A.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2002-037
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for
public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your
comments to three minutes.
III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of the Minutes for August 7, 2002.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Item ....................... TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30834
Applicant ................ Madison Estates, LLC
Location ................. North side of Avenue 58 and west of Madison
Street.
Request .................. Review of landscaping plans for parkway
improvements
Action .................... Minute Motion 2002-
ALRC/AGENDA
F.V V V ooi1
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
B. Item ....................... COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM 2002-019
Applicant ................ Desert Sage Restaurant - Steve Fortuin
Location ................. 78-085 Avenida La Fonda
Request .................. Funding request for exterior improvements
Action .................... Minute Motion 2002-
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
.�vu002
ALRC/AGENDA
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
August 7, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
110:00 a.m.
A. This meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Committee was called
to order at 10:06 a.m. by Associate Planner Greg Trousdell who led the
flag salute.
B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt and David Thoms. It was
moved and seconded by Commissioners Bobbitt/Thorns to excuse
Committee Member Cunningham. Unanimously approved.
C. Staff present: Management Analyst Debbie Powell, Associate Planners
Greg Trousdell and Wallace Nesbit, and Executive Secretary Betty
Sawyer.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA:
A. Staff informed the Committee that Item A on the agenda had been pulled
at the request of the applicant.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of July 3, 2002.
Commissioner Thoms noted some minor changes. There being no further
corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee: Members
Bobbitt/Thorns to approve the Minutes as corrected.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Specific Plan 2001-051 Amendment #1 and Village Use Permit 2001-
007. Amendment #1; a request of Cameo Homes for review of
architectural and landscaping plans for a multi -storied 200 unit apartment
complex and two commercial buildings on 12 acres in a Village
Commercial District located north of Calle Tampico and east (Eisenhower
Drive.
G:\WPD0CS\ARLC\8-7-02.Wpd f 'w , 0 0 3
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
August 7, 2002
1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell gave an explanation of the
project and introduced Mr. Forrest Haag, landscape architect, and
Mr. Keith Labus, KTGY Group, architect for the project, who gave
presentations on the project.
2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what had happened to the
previous Vista Montana project. Mr. Haag stated Desert Sands
Unified School District had purchased 12 acres of the: site for a
school which caused a change in the master plan.
3. Committee Member Thorns asked if the stucco was to be smooth.
Mr. Haag stated smooth trowel was anticipated, but had not yet
been determined.
4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what material would be used to
construct the parking structure. Mr. Haag stated wood with
structural steel and glu-lams. Committee Member Bobbitt
suggested paralams be used instead and asked if the land use was
appropriate. Staff stated the Specific Plan would have to be
amended, but apartments are allowed on the site. Mr. Haag
stated that in the Village area of the City, this type: of use is
encouraged to create vibrance to sustain the commercially planned
developments.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the height of the buildings in
the Village Commercial district. Staff stated it is 35 feet.
6. Committee Member Thorns stated the buildings are packed onto
the site with only one "people place". There needs to be another
kind of recreational area. Mr. Haag stated there is a reservoir east
of the project that will be a green belt with a potential for some
kind of court.
7. Committee Member Bobbitt agreed there should be some
additional recreational area on the site.
8. Committee Member Thorns asked what material would be used for
the ground cover. Mr. Haag explained turf and shrubs with a
decomposed granite trail connecting the buildings, common area,
and parking areas. In regard to the recreational areas, it is hard to
justify having two swimming pools with only 200 units.
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\8-7-02.wpd 2
JP.V (, 004
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
August 7, 2002
9. Committee Member Thorns reviewed the plans noting there is
space on the site that could be developed for open space and he
will recommending a secondary people space be added.
10. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he would like to see the final
plant palette be brought back to the Committee. Mr. Haag asked
if the final plan could come back to the ALRC. Staff stated they
could.
1 1 . Committee Member Thorns asked that between the peripheral wall
and the parking spaces their is a nuisance area that should consist
of a decomposed granite and the wall be a solid wall for sound
attenuation.
12. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that if trees are to be added on
the perimeter, the applicant should provide enough room to allow
the tree to grow. Mr. Haag explained what they had proposed.
13. Committee Member Thorns stated that if they planted a
substantial tree instead of two or three smaller ones, it can work
better. He asked what the commercial uses would be. Mr. Haag
stated the vision is retail on the first floor and residential on the
second floor. Committee Member Thorns stated his concern that
there wasn't much visibility from the street.
14. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion
2002-032 recommending approval of Village Use Permit 2001-
007, subject to the conditions as submitted and amended:
A. Secondary people spaces be added within the units.
B. The south and east side walls be a solid wall with
decomposed granite material between the parking spaces
and the perimeter wall.
C. The final planting concept drawings be brought back to the
ALRC identifying the plant sizes and location at a 1 " = 20'
scale.
Unanimously approved.
B. Site Development Permit 2001-702. Amendment #1; a regluest of La
Quinta Congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses for review of architectural
plans for a second church building located on the east side of Dune
Palms Road, across from the La Quinta High School.
G:\WPDOCSWRI.C\8-7-02.wpd 3 •v oo�
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
August 7,2002
1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell explained the project and
introduced Mr. Allen Elkins, Project Chairman for the project, who
gave a presentation on the project.
2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the second building was
similar in design to the first building. Mr. Elkins, representing the
applicant, stated the Planning Commission had directed them to
have different roof lines. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the
roof lines need to be differentiated to enhance the building and
give interest. On the landscaping they need to add plant materials
with differing heights to help break up the building. Some of the
island wells need to be enlarged and he would suggest using a
larger variety of trees.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what material would be used on
the north and south perimeter wall. Mr. Elkins stated it would be
a block wall with shrubs. The south has an existing chainlink
fence that needs to be removed and they are working with the
adjoining property owner to resolve the problem.
4. Committee Member Thorns questioned why the landscape plan
was not included. Staff went over the history of the project and
stated it had been approved with the first building submittal.
Committee Member Thorns stated the elevations on the drawings
do not reflect what was submitted in the Committee's packet.
There is no articulation on the building and he would like to see
something added. Mr. Elkins stated one side faces the well site
and the other the retention basin. Committee Member Thorns
stated there will be development to the north that will see the
blank wall. Mr. Jeff Stofker, representing the applicant, stated it
is more fully addressed on the site plan. Staff stated the original
approval allowed the applicant to have staff approval.
5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002-
033 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002-
740, as modified.
A. Landscaping added to break up the exterior building walls.
Unanimously approved.
G:\WPDOCSWRLC\8-7-02.wpd 4
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
August 7,2002
C. Site Development Permit 2002-749; a request of David F.
Hauck/Ponderosa Homes for review of architectural plans for three
residential plans to be constructed in Tract 29323 located on the
northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street.
1. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit introduced Mr. David Hauck,
Ponderosa Homes, who gave a presentation on the project.
2. Committee Member Thorns complemented the applicant on the
entry tower on Plan 2.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if they would have: the same
roof tile. Mr. Hauck stated there would be a variety of style and
color.
4. Committee Member Thorns asked about the garage doors. Mr.
Hauck stated it would depend on what was available. Committee
Member Thorns asked if the entry landscaping would be brought
back to the Committee. Staff stated when the applicant was
ready it would come before the Committee for a recommendation.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the grade change and the
existing homes in Bermuda Dunes Country Club. Staff explained
it has been the City's position that there not be a grade differential
of more than three feet to be compatible with the adjoining
project.
6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the rear yard walls. Mr.
Hauck stated they would be block, but he did not know what
material would be used.
7. Committee Member Thorns stated his concern was the streetscape
along Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Staff stated it
would be brought back to the Committee for their review and
recommendation.
8. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what material would be used for
the shutters. Mr. Hauck stated it would be a composite material.
Committee Member Bobbitt asked if additional articulation could
be added to the side elevations.
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\8-7-02.wpd 5
*.VI 007
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
August 7, 2002
9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-
034 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002-
749, subject to the conditions as submitted. Unanimously
approved.
D. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-018; a request of
Augustin and Francisca Martinez for funding of exterior improvements for
the property located at 78-100 Calle Tampico.
1. Management Analyst Debbie Powell presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department and introduced Mr.
Augustine Martinez, owner of the property, who gave a
presentation on the request.
2. Committee Member Thorns asked why this project was being
brought to the Committee. Mr. Martinez stated the funding was
to enhance the look of the building. Committee Member Thorns
stated he did not think this would improve the building's
appearance. Mr. Martinez stated their future plans are to convert
the building to a restaurant.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the building is an eyesore to
begin with. If he was to allocate City money, it would) not be for
gates, but for architecture elements to enhance the building. As
far as the patio cover, it needs to be built out of a different
material.
4. Committee Member Thorns stated he could not approve City funds
for this proposal.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt agreed and suggested Mr. Martinez
resubmit a plan that would enhance the look of the building.
6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002-
035 denying CPIP 2002-018, but encouraged the applicant to
resubmit with a different proposal. Unanimously approved.
G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\8-7-02.wpd 6
01 008
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
August 7, 2002
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS:
Vill. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee: Members
Bobbitt/Thorns to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping
Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on September 4, 2002. This
meeting was adjourned at 1 1 :42 p.m. on August 7, 2002.
Respectfully submitted,
BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
G:AWPDOCSVARLCA8-7-02.wpd 7 009
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2002
CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30834
APPLICANT: MADISON ESTATES, LLC
REQUEST: LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW OF PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30834, A 76-LOT SINGLE FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT ON 29+ ACRES
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 58 AND '/z MILE WEST OF MADISON
STREET
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT: RGA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Architecture and Landscape Review
Committee, please prepare your comments on this proposal for discussion at the
meeting.
Recommended conditions are: 1) Provide an undulating sidewalk on Avenue 58; 2)
Grading details shall be reviewed by the City's Public Works Department; and 3) The
final landscape plan for parkways and retention basins shall be approved by the
Community Development and Public Works Departments in accordance with Chapter
8.13 (Water Efficient Landscaping) of the La Quinta Municipal Code.
F1
TrG%s&ll, Associate Planner
Atta'a merA,�: Large Plans (Committee members only)
G:ALRC TTM30834grcg.wpd
<.j 1 010
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE:
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
BACKGROUND:
SEPTEMBER 4, 2002
2002-019
DESERT SAGE RESTAURANT
STEVEFORTUN
FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
78-085 AVENIDA LA FONDA
Steve Fortun, owner of the Desert Sage Restaurant, has submitted an application
(Attachment 1) under the Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking
funding assistance for improvements to the above -listed property. The proposed
project consists of removing the existing fabric canopy over the patio on the east side
of the building and replacing it with a metal frame and glass enclosure. The enclosure,
which will be visible from Avenida La Fonda, will be approximately 40' long by 20'
wide. The metal will be painted to complement the building's color. The enclosure
is being installed to improve the building's appearance as well as protect patio diners
from blowing dust and the weather. The entire project cost is estimated to exceed
$148,000; however, the applicant is submitting bids for the enclosure only. Cost
estimates range from $50,384.07 to $88,000.00; the applicant is seeking $15,000
in CPIP funding, and will be providing more than the required 10% match.
A Funding Criteria worksheet is included as Attachment 2 to facilitate scoring of this
project.
If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City
departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After receiving
all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into a loan program agreement
with the applicant.
The applicant has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that he will be
present at the September 4, 2002 meeting. Photos of the building will be provided
at the meeting.
011
Prepared by:
Debbie Powell, Management Analyst
City Manager's Office
Attachments:
1. CPIP Application
2. Funding Criteria Worksheet
t.J 012
ATTACHMENTS
.ja 013
PROGRAM STEPS (CONT.)
be based on the lowest bid amount(s). The applicant
may choose any licensed contractor, but the funding
award will be based on the lowest bid,
6. If applicable, an architect or design professional will
prepare construction drawings.
7. The applicant will obtain three (3) contractor bids. All
contractors must be licensed by the State and have a
business license with the City of La Quinta. Bids need
only be obtained up to the Program limits (i.e. $15,000).
For example, if the improvement/construction costs are
$100,000, the applicant does not need to get three (3)
bids for every component or for the total amount.
However, if the applicant is seeking $15,000, then three
(3) bids must be obtained totaling at least $16,500
($15,000 plus 10% match of $1,500) for that component
being funded by the Program.
8. The applicant will submit the construction bids and proof
of contractor insurance to Agency staff.
9. The Agency and applicant will sign a Building
Improvement Rebate Agreement (Rebate Agreement)
outlining the work to be completed. No work shall
commence (other than the initial design activities) until
the applicant submits an executed Rebate Agreement
and the applicant obtains all applicable building permits.
10. The applicant, or the contractor, will obtain all applicable
building permits.
11. The applicant is responsible for project implementation.
Construction must start within ninety (90) days from
obtaining building permits and be completed within one
(1) year after the execution of the Rebate Agreement.
12. The loan may be funded in three equal payments at the
applicant's request. Payment of 33% of the total amount
will be made when construction commences. Second
payment of 33% of the total amount will occur when the
project is 50% complete (the Rebate Agreement will
describe this milestone). The third payment will be made
upon project completion and verification of the items
presented in #13 and #14 below. If the applicant does
not choose the three equal payment plan, the payment
will be made upon project completion and verification of
the items presented in #13 and #14 below.
13. Upon completion, the applicant must submit photos of the
finished project and proof of vendor payment and
contractor lien releases. Agency staff will then visit the
site to certify project completion within (15) days after
receiving these materials from the applicant.
14. The applicant will receive the final progress payment
upon verification of project completion. This will occur
within fifteen (15) days after the site visit and certification
of vendor payments and construction lien releases. For
new construction, final progress payments will not be
made until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by
the City and the business is open to the public.
15, Successful applicants must comply with all local, State,
and Federal laws, including payment of any prevailing
wages as applicable and required by law.
ATTACHMENT 1
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
Commercial Property Improvement Program Application
Fiscal Year2001-200z
1 -3
Applicant Information
Applicant Name:
Applicant Phone: �; 4 ti l �>, 5 Applicant E- Mail:
Name of Business: 1Z) Y=. S L rt-T 1=
Mailing Address: -� — O8 r-i y_\ t,(s ;!Y-1 tij k) P�
Business Phone: w-i `1 y `ti Business Fax: (o V 81 \C
Property Owner: Yes: ✓ No:
Business Owner: Yes: '-�� No:
Project Information
Business Location: �`6'�gS F;JL•�y trDb�,
Type of Business:
Project Goals: r:S
oyn.
Proposed Improvements: ` t. s"V-, G�14 s 3 `\/�, � t i, ^v x �-•. � `t
Total Project Cost (please attach cost estimate):
Requested Agency Assistance: Applicant Match:
Description of Applicant Funding Sources: O v3 K%_ 4 b ,
Proposed Project Duration
Attachments
• Two (2) color photographs of the property where improvements will be installed
• Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level)
Cost estimates
Certification Statements
If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the following certification must be
completed by the property owner:
I, , declare under penalty and perjury that I am the owner of
property involved in this application. I acknowledge that only one (1) tenant of the subject
property involved in this application may be awarded Program funding in any one (1) given fiscal
year.
Signature: Date:
The following statement must be completed by the applicant and propenyowner
Ilwe acknowledge the filing of this application and certify ghat all above information is true and
correct to the best of mylour knowledge and belief. I/we understand that a Building Improvement
Rebate Agreement must be signed and aufhorized by tha La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
2dor to commencing any work on the project. 7
Signature: �.C¢rv- - - "�-c�w,.�— Date: 'S/Z`i
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed application, with required attachments, to:
City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
c/o�deira 6asiUa:9e t�no'e Fbwz I 1
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
to
0
DOSSMONIHS 83HS3W Wd90:SO 20, 2T Onld
ca
c
TT/OT'd
'30SSUIDNIHS 63HS3W WdOV:VO ZO. ZT onu
1�
,A
i
4
t-.0 u , 017
0OSSbIONIHS N3HS3W W80V:2O 20. L0 onu
SENT BY: QWJ,jj..g2..05:05PM MESHER SHING8f�%%CCdB®9Bj AUG-12-02 3:54PM;
ENWENC71NEERS NORTHWEST* INC., P.S. � S'LItU('I'URAL ENGI?ivE&�—_,
a g �vonpl Aww Mr.N. C , R205. &iArnl+. WA 981 t 5 (206) 575 -7560 Pwc (206) 52241WR
.--
SiAU1SL7
I
AUG 12 102 04:40PM MESHER SHING&ASSOC.
1
�i
.I'
OggRESTAIAAW
111VII LVL,AWIL'-I\ iNJ.L
S-014ARMACS
affIfIVIVOUSILY
FIRRAC.A7YlV
To: Jim McCullough
Art Gautreeu Inc.
Ire: Desert Sage Canopy Budget
�I n i j nvv IV LUVL IJ. u4/VI. IJ•UJ/IVV-ur UVL'uULVI r 1
Klowand, wt od:41a
(.t25) B27•i00.i
FOX (425) 8:3-5I570
August 16, 20C2
A% oanamed per faxed drawings and mutual discussions, EveVvm House, too, proposes the following bcdgx to
fisnish and install onmplelte the aluminum and glass canopy.
20',.9" x 44'-0" Canopy aver steel At<me by othem includes six opateble v®nts w/motor operation
and rain sensors.
=01 All Aluminum Samhtg to hn paintud with castom 2-0oat Kynar paint. Color by Oww / Archrted.
Not included am metallic or exotic colors, without an additioml charge for incxra►reri paint ana,
GQ&QtiG: 511(r Btm2e or CWq Reflective Heat Strengthened Laminated w/.060 PVR Inowlayn,
QualalirAtions: Adjaeeut and support couatnictlea mast support foraea imposed by glazing sysknL
Evtxgroan House, Inc. standard detalla to be wee►.
Ine2nllafon by the teal orNevamber.
All quotes will romain valid for ninety days *am date above,
EIGHTY FM THOUSAND DOLLARS
IExclu nos: Final Cleaniag
Gutters, Liners, Strap or Oownspouro
Any Taxes,Hands, Pea or permits
Breakage. oral Protection from others
Any Wood, Steel or Embeds
Support CurSs (Wood, Steel, Concrete, etc.)
Thank
ISVEBOR.EEN 1 joust'•, Mc.'
4 ,r, Weddle
lho)rxa ivianager
020
30 lovd oNI nV]18invo bird L90BVEGPIL 17z:vi Z00Z/6T/B0
Nmes AJ',T (hkLfI'RBAI)1NC
OUTH
15561 PRODUCER 1.4, UMT P
HUNTINGTON BEACH CA, 92&49
COAST 800-440-9999 FAX 714-379-6992.
SKYLIGHTS F-MAILsOuth-t;old9t-&RYllghtakgDworldneRsttileI
STATE! CONTRACTORS LICENSE: # 574454
PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT
A,cldvig 1110 NATELLA AVE, SUITE I
.1tlb ]i(anlr. DESERT SAGE RESTAUpA;gT
.Tob {l.ddivu 7801;5 AVSNIDA 1.A FONI)A
Phone 714-934.3066
City STANTON
City LA QURaTA
August 15, 2002
STAte CA• Zip 90650
State CA,
Alterni mi JIM NiCCULLOUGEi FRx Phame 71d-p44-SO67
:r17IS"PgMmXS,^Is VODTUNLEgS-Xa. job
SCOPI3 Olt WORI(:: FMNIISk.T AND INSTALL TBE FOLLOWINGS METAL FRAME SKYLIGHTS.
t I1iU11, ANTI RIDGE CANOPY WITH S ELECTRICAL 22 " X 4e OPENING BAYS.
ZIF 92233
C Le1.7TA?(:: I" OVERALL C'ONSI3'I7NG OF Y." SOLAR COOL (TRAY OR HRONZR AM SPACE '/," CLEAR I A•MIa4'Nr1m
`'F':Rp.6IE COLCJRB KYNA.AFIh31SII STANDARD COLOR NON EXOTIC NON-NIETALLIC WARRkNTY :SEE ItIARTIN FI I!-,1FS
`MAIiUl'AC"TURR'ri IO YR. GTIA.RANTEES ON 1,FAI(S OF BIGYLIOFITS
<IIlfI01' Or 119M V1� MpRr UST IcF y PLAM, BY O9VNBB OR OWNERS ARCF=CI AND SHOP DRAWING WILL RECO.MM
IPARi' �QP 7'� &'T,q,1V1PEDCITY PLANS.
°a`IIO."RAWA+f(;:5 TWILL BE PROVIDE[, AND MUST BE APPROVED BEFORT FABRICATION.
°KkAM:? TCI Ri: YA.HIIICAS'>ID FROM 6053.TS AILVMIIft t, ALL IN'lCRSECTIONS SHALL BE 9ELI-ARCfi.WISLpED
em'W /GR 1bfEMA1'iICALLY F'ASTMO.., SEAL ALL PANZY.5 TO PREVENT WATER PENETRATION,
Clf)"F. AND OTHER ATTACM'4RNT PCIMS MUST BE BUILT TO SUPPORT LOAD TRRUVM0 OF SIC 1(LIC:FITS.
^fiTWICTURAL C!AiLCU1.A ""g ARE )WCLUDM IN'IHI9 IROPOSAL.
"ITIE FOLLIpWM, ITENT5 ARE :NOT 1Ne"WED IN THE BID PRICE AND ARE CONSWEitM ADJUTTONAL F'M:
*RFL)OFTNG,1NDCCbtiNTERFLASHDTGEV079IEFtS.
C'dT111?I'ffi3WS, FEES ARE NOT INCT.UDIcB,
°i13-p(:TRICAL SQ-tRCF9 By OT HERS.
`1=dQCT1A1r1W 1)41%; AGES, PRVOUM PLRFORMA.NCE/ PAYMENT aONUB.
•1!181DT.'EC1fI:�1U OF ALL SKYLIGIfT OPEI+1D+iG, INTERIOR OF BUILDING FROM WEATB$R pAN1fAGE BY OTI�RS
PRIOR I'C1 COI,31?�LiB�TION OF LWSTALL,4TiON-
U181'It'C'p[mF�N 7.8.ALL BFCO] IE PART OF AND ATTACHED TO ANY ADDITIONAL CONTRACT DOCUPIE NTS
VOR TIR ABOVE 1vw.VTTcbmlgn wnev
SLX AND 33/100 _ DOLLAM (-%-2&VL3g
ra.YntE�nn.I•rnpl:amA.Ivc - ,
CODPCIIACTORS AIRE REQUIRED BY 1.AW TO BE LICENSED AND REGULATED BY I= CONTR4CTORs STATT LIC EN g0
APi'1f QUESTIONS CONCERTING CONIRAG'I'ORS AIAY BE REFERRED TO TM RRGISTRAR OF T= BOpRp SMOSM AM)lk%! cR IS
C(DFt't'I!AC.".1'OR'fi $TATF. D.dCENBI'$U�A : P9ACRAMNXT0, CA Y33W
51A.I2S REP. RICK F;FE31r
F'R:.IE 7'000RU1,riATC4R!sHADINCuNMITCHELL _
VUJ,+AE MMESYAOTti�UMD TO PIIRKS11 ALL MATUMMAL3 ANi7IA80RT0 Od BTI IiIE WORK M&d710NED 1N Tk3b Afl7yg pRplq�
V AD�IO[ID1f 1MEN1Tt><.t1I1 GY SA,IDP,�OPOSe1LACCDRA7Ii0 TMO-I{$'L)RMS tMaR .I HAVE p,GAeRMM NROM Ai�D nAo1: PAGeS OPT PltOPOSALrANQ CAtd'il.Lntt 15
LN7Ea8IAT!U Ad'f nG'.�PI,W L:e MN'S.S T1iTS AEtNOMG CONTMC(,
YM,', M2 3TI'1L%MA}! CCA;4= THIS YaANSA011ON AT A,NY TMO PRIOR TOMION101Yr OF TiiE Ti1,TIO BtISQIIi9S PAY AFTER filE OATS OF THIfS 7RANBAC,t10H
--
021
G3 39Vd ONI nV3ainvo i6v L908VEGVTL OZ:OT Z00Z/15T;80
PROPOSAL & CONTRACT
AWGU51 1 Z. 2002
AkT GAUTREAU, INC.
8-210 YATELLA. AV[., STE. I
::TANTGN, CA 90680
PmRw aax
714-934.8066 714-934-8067
II'M M,X.ULLCUCH
one
Rd. P...: RAFAEL RIM0
iF LLV 1 J iI'l Cw1niR: YrinC i.1IXK'
rPYni4Gt NrnR _•_•••••• �•••••_�—
DEMT SAGE RESTAURANT
7W85 AVENIDA LA FONDA
LA QUINTA
prgecepnene; Pmra LY
.ter
ESTERNN
Window & Door
Gvrp.
Viewpoint i)ijim
`+ 1�'W+:�it1$
`� tic. ael . ere'ri
420 PTI=land OL
C Wla,CA. 9'!879
Tdr Wg) 279.3434
Fos: (409) 279.3412
Y111, l lcm r. It N6838
a 4. 12 pitch- the front hip shall hays a 70 degree pitch. The unit shall consist of sire Iites per
side and four liter on slope.
The frame color as selected in tactory app4ied Viewpoint polyurethane Tuf-Coat paint system.
Thrs glluig Rhall hA insulating consisting of.
114" solarcool gray tempered outboard lite
1/2' air space
5116" clear heat strengthened laminated inboard lite
This proposal biased on providing optimum glass lite sixes. Customers requests for glass panels in excess cf
15 sq. ft. may result in increased visual defnrmatinn rharacterisrics.
Inclusions: Frames shall be fabricated utilizing 6063-T5 or T6 extruded aluminun and shall be hell -arch
welded or mechanically listened at corners and intersections as detailed on the design dra,winl;s.
Deslgj Ltraw W will be provided by Viewpoint and must be approved prior to commencement of fabrication.
K is hereby agreed that drawing approval shall denote acceptance of the design, material specilications, general
notes, and requirements as Indicated. The Customer shall be raspnnsihie fnr mist- of rhanges made after
fabrication begins.
Cartifind stru,aut-A calculations are Included,
11'erm,si SO% deposit required, balance due upon substantial completion. No retention withheld from
paymenm A breach of the terms above by the purchaser shall relieve this contractor of any and all further
perforirrancei. This proposal is subject to acceptance within in days of the above date and upon
acceptance sltal I become part of the contract agreement between Viewpoint and the purchaser.
E,xelueslons: Wood or steel of any kind or as detailed on Viewpoint drawings. Curbs, curb flashings or
counter, flashings. Any testing, test reports and all costs for testing including mockups and geld water test
Temporary or permanent protection for skylight. units. Permint or permit fees. Final cleaning.
F.esponsibility for Iicalidmed damages. Anything not specifically included in this proposal.
ApplicAlte Sa4es;iax included in base bid.
Base Wd: FIFTY THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY FOLIK ...... ........... W/130
-----.— ""T— —„eF ------------------------
Filternafe #kl For ear_h 4' x 3 electric opera�le: to base bid AUD + i
�Aernate #2 --------------------- ----` —
Alternem ie3 -----------------_------- }TL—
TOTAIL LUMP SUM AMOUNT: ------------- _-.-___.-
Accepted By:
Signature print Name
For Company` Date.
Manm faeture3 of Dasdastivv Windaw A2 Door tad SYyligla Products
022
03 39Vd W fitl minv9 16d tWa8 E6vTL bZ:t T Z00Zi6T,'80
ATTACHMENT 2
FUNDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET
BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS:
This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non-
conforming uses (i.e. signs), and other improvements that enhance the general appearance
of the subject property.
001
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score
SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS:
This may include the reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies,
exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the
entrance and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be
considered.
25
Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight
= weighted score
STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT:
Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to
customers, neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10
additional points will be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new
businesses, or the expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area.
Scale 0-10 points x
10
Category Weight = weighted score
OTHER:
This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site
design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational opportunities.
Scale 0-10 points x
10
Category Weight = weighted score
APPLICANT MATCHING FUNDS:
Applicants may receive up to 5 points, for exceeding the required 10% applicant funding
match.
Scale 0-5 points x Category Weight = weighted score
Total of all weighted scores: divide by 10 = (FINAL SCORE)
(70 points required to receive funding)
�„ 023