The URL can be used to link to this page

2003 03 05 ALRCTay/ 4 a�w OF rN� IV V ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California MARCH 5, 2003 10:00 A.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2003-005 CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes for February 5, 2003. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Item ...................... Applicant ............... Location ................. Request .................. Action .................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-760 Gensler Architects for Bank of America Northwest corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street within Point Happy Commercial Center Review of architectural and conceptual landscaping plans for a 4,000 square foot bank facility with a drive through Minute Motion 2003- ALRC/AGENDA .UOU001 ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE B. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-761 Applicant ................ Klein Building & Development, Inc. Location ................. North side of Highway 111, 310 feet west of Dune Palms Road Request .................. Review of architectural and landscaping plans for seven commercial buildings on a six acre site Action .................... Minute Motion 2003- C. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-759 Applicant ................ St. Francis of Assisi Location ................. 47-225 Washington Street Request .................. Review of landscaping plans for future; expansion of the parking lot Action .................... Minute Motion 2003- D. Item ....................... COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2003-020 Applicant ................ Santa Rosa Plaza/Bridget Myers Location ................. Northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. Request .................. Review of a request to enhance the exterior/entry of the Santa Rosa Plaza Action .................... Minute Motion 2003- E. Item ....................... COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2003-021 Applicant ................ La Quinta Grill - Ken West Location ................. 78-034 Calle Barcelona Request .................. Review of a request for parking and landscape improvements. Action .................... Minute Motion 2003- VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS VIII. ADJOURNMENT ALRC/AGENDA �'u u u 0 0 2 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 5, 2003 CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:12 a.m. by Planning Manager Oscar Oirci who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham, and David Thorns. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Management Analyst Debbie Powell, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planners Wallace Nesbit and Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of January 8, 2003. Committee Member Thorns asked that Page 3, Item 10 be amended to state he "...requested architecture and site work...... Also, Page 4, Item 4, be amended tp state, ....retention basin hoped it would be eliminated". There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thom to approve the Minutes as amended. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2002-752; a request of Cornerstone Developers for review of common area and perimeter landscaping plans for Tentative Tract Map 29323-Esplanade. 1 . Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit gave an overview of the project and introduced Ray Lopez, Ray Lopez Associates who gave an overview of the project. G:AWPDOCSVARLCA2-5-03.wpd I ^ •U J 003 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 5, 2003 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked how the individual homeowners' walls are constructed when they landscape the interior lots. Mr. Lopez stated it is all private and handlled through the CC&R's and with the homeowners' association (HOA). Committee Member Cunningham suggested they request .Art and Public Places funds for the corner. He further asked if the City has any stipulation requiring only male palms on street side. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the planter area outside the sidewalk along Fred Waring Drive. Mr. Lopez stated all the plant material for this area is low growing or where it is no more than two feet he leaves it as decomposed granite (DG). Committee Member Bobbitt stated it is a problem maintaining plant material too close together, or at the edges. It is trimmed too closely and becomes unattractive. Mr. Lopez stated they were using Red Yucca or something like where it is a problem. Emitters are also a problem as to their location. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there was a reason the entrance islands have a different variety of trees along Fred Waring Drive. Mr. Lopez stated it was just to have variety. Committee Member Bobbitt suggested using the standard or multi -trunk palms, as some species are very prone to wind damage. The multi -trunk are better. Mr. Lopez explained the perimeter is multi -trunk and the interior would be the standard. Committee Member Bobbitt suggested the majority be multi -trunk. He then asked what was proposed for Lot C. Staff stated the entire landscape area is labeled Lot C. Mr. Lopez stated it would be a passive: recreation area. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what type of material the exterior wall would be constructed of. Staff stated it would a tan slumpstone material with a cap. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if any plant material would be on the wall. Mr. Lopez stated no. 4. Committee Member Thorns stated the landscaping at the corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, should be more of an opportunity to use the plant forms as a design element. It appears to be a scattered grove of palms. Behind there is a grove of citrus in a staggered form and then a lawn and border that does not reflect any kind of design element. The corner may look nice as a landscaped area, but does not make a landscape design statement. These are prominent corners in the City and should make a design statement versus just being a streetscape. He G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-5-03.wpd 2 O�1: 004 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 5, 2003 asked if the turf was flat or contoured, etc. Mr. Lopez stated he was questioning himself whether to do a design that was formal or informal and decided to mix the two. 5. Committee Member Cunningham commented that the plans need to be looked at from a maintenance point as well. The widening of Jefferson Street, development of the other corners, and the effects of that will all play into the picture. The opposite side of the street is the City of Indio and will be spruced up as the sites develop. The grass area could have great potential utilizing plants, but will be the easiest to maintain as the area and street develops. It does need to be tightened up and become more cohesive in the design by adding the palms. This design does resemble the PGA West entrance. He would keep the grass and bring more uniformity to the dates. Mr. Lopez suggested they come back with an alternative design for the corner landscaping only. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt suggested he take some alternatives to the Planning Commission for their review. Staff stated the applicant was directed to not address the corner as it is an area the City Council may want to address as an entry statement. In regard to the maintenance, it may become a part of a Bighting and landscaping district at some point in time. 7. Committee Member Thorns stated unless some other body in the City has designed what will be placed at this corner, it should be addressed at this time. The whole corner should be rearranged with the plant materials to create a land form. It needs to be a visual statement. 8. Planning Manager Oscar Orci informed the Committee that staff was working with the developer of the corner to the south to also create an entrance statement for the corner. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Cunningham to adopt Minute Motion 2003-004, approving Site Development Permit 2002-752, as amended. a. The landscaping at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive shall be developed and reviewed and redesigned to become more of a design statement for the short term and long term. Unanimously approved. ..uu 005 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-5-03.wpd 3 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 5, 2003 B. Village Use Permit 2003-016; a request of Frank Glynn for review of architecture and landscaping plans for a five unit apartment building located on the east side of Avenida Martinez, south of Calle Tampico. 1. Principal Planner Fred Baker gave an overview of the project and introduced Mr. Frank Glynn, architect for the project, who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it is a very boxy looking building. The second floor is all right, but the profile needs to be enhanced. 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated the projects in La Quinta recently have been improving in style and moving up in quality, recognizing the economics. The Village has sat for a long time and is now beginning to develop into its own. His opinion is that this is standard architecture to house people. We now have an opportunity and he would like to see a design that is more in keeping with where the Village is headed. There is a responsibility now in the Village to improve the architecture that provides shelter as well as makes an architectural statement. This project as designed is not acceptable. Mr. Glynn stated he agrees with everything as stated, however his client has requested this design. With the direction from the Committee, it allows him the opportunity to relay this information to his client to allow him to develop a better looking building. 4. Committee Member Thorns stated he agreed with Committee Member Cunningham. All bare land is an opportunity to develop to the highest quality it can be. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the parking structure appears to be constructed out of wood, he would recommend an alternative material be used that will hold up over time:. 6. Committee Member Thorns stated the landscape material is not appropriate in the present locations. 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Cunningham to adopt Minute Motion 2003-005, denying Village Use Permit 2003-016, directing the applicant to prepare a design that addresses the following concerns: ..U(J, 006 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-5-03.wpd 4 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 5, 2003 a. The architectural style of the building should be redrawn to reflect more of a Village theme; b. An alternative to wood materials shall be used on the parking structure; and C. A landscape material palette designed to be more appropriate for the site and exposures. C. Site Development Permit 2002-759; a request of Sedona Homes, Inc. for review of prototype architecture plans for four residential unit types located northeast of the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 54 within The Hideaway, Tract 29894. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa gave an overview of the (project and introduced Lance Alcama, representing Sedona Homes, who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt commended the applicant on his design of the garages. He asked if there was still a requirement for three car garages for three bedroom homes. Staff stated it was no longer required. 3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2003-006, approving Site Development Permit 2002-759, as submitted. Unanimously approved. D. Review of the Commercial Property Improvement Program. Debbie Powell, Management Analyst stated that at the January meeting, the Committee asked staff for an overview of the program in regard to the spirit and intent. Staff reviewed the guidelines and found that any business within the Village could apply. There is no stipulation as to whether it has to be a particular size, income, old or new business. There was nothing that precludes a new project or business from applying. 1 . Committee Member Bobbitt stated it was strange to give money to a new business. It seems it should be for the existing older businesses to bring them up to a better quality. Assistant City Manager Mark Weiss stated staff receives several requests for all types and sizes of businesses for economic development. The program was originally designed to facilitate facade and landscaping improvements for the existing Village area. Through G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-5-03.wpd 5 ..0 tf , 007 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 5, 2003 the years, staff has received requests for other types of funding and with those requests, staff has analyzed these requests with an extensive rate of return analysis. Performance analysis are submitted; it is a very extensive process and not all business have the ability to go through this type of analysis. We do not have programs available just for small businesses. With all types of businesses approaching the City for assistance and not having anything to try to stimulate and guide the type of development we want to encourage, we changed this Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) to address this need. Something that was less bureaucratic, but would still meet the intent of enhancing the Village and stimulating economic development in the Village in an aesthetically pleasing manner consistent with the intent of the CPIP program. With this in mind, staff did not anticipate having applications submitted for the CPIP assistance after golfing through the more formal application process for approval. There was nothing in the CPIP guidelines that precluded it and as staff reviewed the application, it was determined this was not a bad idea to have both types of businesses go through the process to see whether or not their request enhances the Village airea and see that it fits with the overall process. In order to go through this program and receive this grant, it would require the applicant to work with Committee to determine if there was an enhancement and make sure the project itself fits with the City's overall object for the Village. This is not a one time review. If the application, in the opinion of the Committee, does not meet the criteria, then the Committee can work with the applicant to achieve that goal. Economic development stimulation is the basis for the program. Each project should be reviewed to see if it is an enhancement from what was approved by the City through the normal planning process. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he has a problem following this through. A new project is submitted to the City and he submits a less than good project and the City says we will give them $15,000 to "kick it up" a notch. 3. Committee Member Cunningham states he has no problem with that. It gives the Committee the opportunity to say whether or not the project has been "kicked up" a notch. The question is what was he proposing and how has he kicked it up the notch. G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-5-03.wpd 6 1 .0 008 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 5, 2003 As presented today, he has no objection to reviewing a project on that basis. In the future, the goals of the program may be somewhat different. A person who comes in with a $50 million dollar project, should maybe not be included in the program. Each project should be reviewed in light of the "spirit of the: program." Assistant City Manager Mark Weiss stated that he agrees with the comments and at some point it should be reviewed and amended. Committee Member Cunningham stated he would think at some point new construction should not be included. 4. Committee Member Thorns stated he hoped this would cause another review of the program. He appreciates staff's comments and their time to explain the program. E. Commercial Pro eeity Improvement Program 2003-020; a request of Santa Rosa Developers for review of a request for funding to enhance the exterior/entry of the Santa Rosa Plaza development located at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. 1 . Management Analyst Debbie Powell gave a report on the request and introduced the applicants for the project. Mr. Jack Stewart, project manager for the project, reviewed the request. 2. Committee Member Thorns asked if the applicant had a copy of the plans proposed. Mr. Stewart gave a review of the entrance stating the artist design for the sign and water feature are what the entrance will be enhanced with. 3. Committee Member Cunningham reviewed what was proposed with the enhancement and stated that in order to review this accurately, there would still need to be more information which would define what has been approved by the City and what they proposed to do to enhance the entry. A detail of the water feature and sign with the total cost is needed to show why this would not be constructed without the funds. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to continue CPIP 2003- 020, with direction to staff to have the applicant submit a clear definition as to what the funds will be used for to enhance the entry. What is approved and what is proposed with the funding. Unanimously approved. G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-5-03.wpd ..uti, 009 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 5, 2003 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on March 5, 2003. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1 :24 a.m. on February 5, 2003. Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-5-03.wpd 8 ! "J u010 BI #A ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: MARCH 5, 2003 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-760 APPLICANT: GENSLER ARCHITECTS FOR BANK OF AMERICA ARCHITECT: RONNIE DIMLA, ARCHITECT REQUEST: ARCHITECTURAL AND CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A 4,000 SQUARE FOOT BANK FACILITY WITH A DRIVE-THRU LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND WASHINGTON STREET WITHIN POINT HAPPY COMMERCIAL CENTER Honorable Chairman and Members of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee, please review this proposal for discussion at the meeting. Staff has no issues. Transmitted by: Fred Baker, Principal Planner C:\!all WPDdocs\ALRC RPT. SDP 2002-760.wpd " *U i1 , 011 M T"df 4 4C1ahra ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: MARCH 5, 2003 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-761 APPLICANT: KLEINE BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. ARCHITECT: ROBERT PITCHFORD REQUEST: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR SEVEN COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ON A SIX ACRE SITE LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, APPROXIMATELY 310 FEET WEST OF DUNE PALMS DRIVE Please review the attached information in preparation for the March 5, meeting. This project is to be constructed in the La Quinta Corporate Center, and is located to the west of the recently approved Radio Active building and the existing USA qas station. Across the street to the north is the J. Paul Building with phase 2 of it under construction. The property to the west is vacant and not approved for any construction. The project consists of 63,550 square feet of floor space in six buildings (five structures) and 254 parking spaces. The architectural and landscape plans are attached. The architectural plans as proposed will meet or be required to meet all setback and other zoning requirements, as well as related Specific Plan conditions and requirements. There may be a need to increase the number of trees installed in the parking lot to provide the required vehicle shading. Attachment: 1. Architectural and landscaping plans Prepared by: Stan Sawa, Principal Planner ..0 O 012 BI #C DATE: CASE NO: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: C&iy� ot 4 19" ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 28, 2003 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2003-073 ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI RANDY PURNELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REVIEW OF LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR A PARKING LOT FOR ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI CHURCH. 47225 WASHINGTON STREET St. Francis of Assisi is proposing to expand their uses on the site which will be done in several phases. While the attached plans show footprints of other proposed buildings, the current proposal before you is for the landscaping plans only as they relate to the parking lot. A Site Development Permit(s) will be brought before you on the other buildings at a future dates). Please prepare your comments on this proposal for discussion at the next ALRC meeting. Transmitted by: Martin Magana, ssociate Planner PAMartin\CUP 2002-073 St. Francis\ALRC.wpd .'j U � 013 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT REQUEST LOCATION: BACKGROUND: MARCH 5, 2003 2003-020 SANTA ROSA PLAZA BRIDGET MYERS, DANNY BROWN FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CALLE TAMPICO/DESERT CLUB DRIVE This item was continued from the February 5, 2003 ALRC meeting. Santa Rosa Plaza has submitted an application (Attachment 1) under the Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking funding assistance for new construction on the above -listed property, which qualifies under the CPIP guidelines. The overall project consists of the construction of entry improvements that include a trellis structure, entry sign walls, landscaping, decorative stamped concrete, a water fountain, and landscape lighting. Specifically, CPIP funds will assist with enhancements to the entry sign wall and the water feature. (It should be noted that CPIP funding has been provided to other businesses in the past for entry sign walls and for fountains/water features.) The applicant has submitted a plan for the entry improvements with the Community Development Department that includes the enhanced signage and water fountain. However, the applicant has indicated that without the CPIP funds, they will have to redesign the entry without the water feature, and that the wall sign would not have the raised and embossed mountain logo and lettering. CPIP funding would allow the applicant to complete the entry per approved plans. Without CPIP funding, there would be deletions to the current plan. The entry improvements will be located on Calle Tampico, south of Desert Club Drive, and will be visible from Calle Tampico. Cost estimates range from $22,500 to $32,000; the applicant is seeking $15,000 in CPIP funding, and will be providing more than the required 10% match. A Funding Criteria worksheet is included as Attachment 2 to facilitate scoring of this project. If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City .ii �l 014 departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After receiving all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into a loan program agreement with the applicant. The applicants have been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that they will be present at the March 5, 2003 meeting. Prepared by: Debbie Powell, Management Analyst City Manager's Office Attachments: 1. CPIP Application 2. Funding Criteria Worksheet •/J ii 015 .'J u 016 ATTACHMENT 1 ` = La Quintal Redevelopment Agency CITY or tagt Commercial Property Improvement Program Application Fiscal Year 200 CITY MANAGER' 2003 Applicant Information Applicant Name; Canf-a Rnaa P1 aZa Applicant Phone: 76Q-77 4077 Applicant E - Mail: Name of Business: Mailing Address: P - 0 - Rt)x 1903 Ta QTii nta CA 22253 Business Phone: 760-77777-4077 BuslnessFax: 760-564-8200 Property Owner: Yes: _ Business Owner: Yes: _ No: Project Information Business Location: La Quinta Commercial District Type of Business: Project Goals: RnhanrP C311 P Ta mpi nm and Pntrance to Santa Rosa ptaZa Development (Provide exterior accent Proposed Improvements: -E,rnnf-R)yi-r)j features to enhance appearance Total Project Cost (please attach cost estimate): Requested Agency Assistance: __ Description of Applicant Funding Sources: _ Proposed Project Duration: Applicant Match: Attachments Two (2) color photographs of the property where improvements will be installed Project sketches or plans (based upon funding level) • Cost estimates Certification Statements If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the following certification must be completed by the property ow r. I, S declare under penalty and perjury that I am the owner of property involved in this application. I acknowle a that only one (1) tenant of the subject property involved in this application may be awarded Program fundin ' any o e (1) given scat year. / Signature: G� 7J/��2-Date: The following statement must be complL by the applicant and property owner: I/we acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all above information is true and correct to the best of mylour knowledge and belief. Ilwe understand that a Building Improvement Rebate Agreement must be: signed and authorized by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency prior to commencing any work on the project. Signature: __Date: Signature: Date: Please return the completed application, with required attachments, to: City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency c/o Debbie Powell 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 .+j0-, 017 Pre cast concrete columns features. Color — Frazee #8673 Column bases will have with a revealed band. Height of main structure shall and as drawn will have rough 16 x 16 rough sawn wood 4 x 4 wood beams (Frazee Entry sign wall shall also be The design includes iandscal approved landscape lighting. A ROSA PLAZA ',S & MATERIALS be painted to match stucco of surrounding Veneer - Champagne flagstone, accented 18 feet from ground to top of wood beams m trellis across. (Frazee #8756) Frazee #8673 areas, with decorative stamped concrete and 1)4 11-25-02 17:27 RECEIVED FROM: P-02 SAN VIE6 9251 Jo�Ic > Riri_F GONS7., INC. o,aT, L�4KESIVE i:r1 92(140 _4..._ia.)S ii 1_:_2 _' 9 O November 25, 2007 S3nid Rs)Sfl Plaza P.O. Box 1503 La Quinta, (A 922- Atten: bridgem, Mvec ite F atbasi, Suites, La CAmaa tiui j P11fCF 011(1TE Pet ),o m- replies], the fl rllalcri'al a12d labor for ar ; is referenced proic Fax ,60-504-82Q0 "deg rep.resenrs our price ipr Main Entrance 11 ork Price: $26,00W00 Pleatie call .)Ur office s o.11c you hAVc .lay yuesti(AlK Thank vou. Sincurely, /i �I �f )`t„n tls n5 11-25-02 17:28 RECEIVED FROM: U 1)4 SU4MIT BUILDERS CONSCRUC110N COMPANY l U1/02 Bridget Myers Santa Rosa Plaza P.O. Box 1503 Laquinta, CA 42253 Ike: Casitas Las Rosas Dear Bridget: Per your request I have bad the fropt entrance priced out for the above-mznlioned project. The cost, which includes material end labor, will be approximately $22,500.00. Please call me if you require any Best Regards, JEFFERY C. STONE, INC:. d.b.a. Robert Kuhl Sr. project Manager 4700 Vpn Kern= Avenue �Suiv iW information BUILDERS Bach. Calllumix 4200 W"5D-%22 [dd0rwi 4o-u lw3lM436 06 11-25-02 17:28 RECEIVED FROM: P.03 uu 020 FAuE 01 11,'?5`2002 17:40 7'bE,449 I .o v.•rrmWINk sir. -+•s.m am rero®o +mr® �®gym Ud eLMe g yeis Santa Rosa Paza P.O. Box 150.5 La Qua ta, 6. 92253 Novembe.r.13, 2p02 Re: Emin aesy suites Entp. Total Proposed Project THANK YOU! NEGr3E ELECTRICAL Ann: Bridget am SUMMIT BUILDERS I IAJ02 Bridget Myers Santa Rosa Plaza P.O. Box 1503 Laquinta, CA 92251 RE: Casitas Las Rosas Dear Bridget: Attached, please find Summit Builders itemized cost breakdown for the Entrance and Ramada pricing for the above -mentioned project. The pricing reflects a lot of assumptions on Summmit Builders part because the plans were still in the preliminary stage. Please call me if you require any additional information or to discuss any of the aforementioned items. Best Regards, JEFFERY C. STONE, INC. d.b.a. SUMMIT BUILDERS Robert Kuhl Sr. Project Manager .'i:; 022 FUNDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET ATTACHMENT 2 BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS: This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non- conforming uses (i.e. signs), and other improvements that enhance the genera!I appearance of the subject property. Scale 0-10 points x 50 Category Weight = weighted score SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS: This may include the reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, awnings/canopies, exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the entrance and visible sides of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be considered. 25 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT: Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to customers, neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or the expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area. Scale 0-10 points x 0 Category Weight = weighted score OTHER: This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational opportunities. Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score APPLICANT MATCHING FUND: Applicants may receive up to Ei points for exceeding the required 10% appllicant funding match. Scale 0-5 points x Category Weight = weighted score Total of all weighted scores: _ divide by 10 (FINAL SCORE) (70 points required to receive funding) 023 "9 EMBASSY SUITES HOTELS• La Quinta, CA "in The Village At Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive" December 20, 2002 Dear Ms. Powell, Please find enclosed copies of Visuals to hand out at the upcoming meeting for Santa Rosa Plaza. Thank you, Shannon on behalf of Bridget Myers P.O. Box 1503�`"�a La Quinta, CA 92253 760-777-4077 024 Fax:760-775-6378 , email: LaQUintaEMBSUITE@aol.com ►n N C SANTA ROSA PLAZA COLORS & MATERIALS Pre Cast concrete columns will be painted to match stucco of surrounding features. Color — Frazee # 8673 Column bases will have Stone Veneer — Champagne Flagstone, accented with a revealed band. Height of main structure shall be 18 feet from ground to top of wood beams .and as drawn will have rough sawn trellis across. Entry sign wall shall also be stucco Frazee # 8673 16 x 16 rough sawn wood beams Frazee # 8756 4 x 4 wood beams Frazee # 8756 The design includes landscaped areas, with decorative stamped concrete and approved landscape lighting. 026 I Jf;. 027 BI ##E ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: MARCH 5. 2003 2003-021 LA QUINTA GRILL KEN WEST FUNDING REQUEST, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 78-034 CALLE BARCELONA Ken West of the La Quinta Grill has submitted an application (Attachment 1) under the Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP) seeking funding assistance for parking and landscape improvements to the above -listed property. According to the CPIP guidelines, eligible projects include " reconstruction and/or expansion of parking lots." This project will reconstruct and enlarge the existing parking lot, and will provide landscaping and lighting to improve the aesthetic appearance of the parking lot and property. Cost estimates range from $118,582 to $129,800; the applicant is seeking $15,000 in CPIP funding, and will be providing more than the required 10% match. A Funding Criteria worksheet is included as Attachment 2 to facilitate scoring of this project. If approved by the ALRC, the application will be reviewed by the appropriate City departments for identification of appropriate approvals/permits, if any. After receiving all appropriate City approvals, the Agency will enter into a loan program agreement with the applicant. The applicant has been made aware of this meeting and has indicated that he will be present at the March 5, 2003 meeting. 023 J Prepared by: Debbie Powell, Management Analyst City Manager's Office Attachments: 1. CPIP Application 2. Funding Criteria Worksheet n 029 ATTACHMENT 1 QLa Quints Redevelopment Agency CwnmeMid Property Improvement program Application fiscal Year 2002- 2003 Applicant Information Apphcun ►dame Ap*.Wn Phum 760-776-40DO Ap hMME-Mail. 5Fowers@am.fwest. com Nana Dfe.einess. La Ouinta Gri 11 I.I.0 Weftq Addren. 41-865 Boy dwalk li 1G Palm T)Pnprt, CA 92211 BOOMas PION: 760-776-4000 9„eweera,r 760-776-4004 PmrwY o■nsr Yes: _ x. NO Bud„C.L owner. Yes- __2L-- Nn: Project information auenessLWOm_, 75 Ls C.at.LE Typodsusinut- Commercial. Office vrojea cod._ 4� IT E.A:, c ,4'r, r:,�•,.:;;;� - ; rr,.�,: �.- v,rri_L L�.VpSeP fRvposed mpool „log ,ls. _„7 f,Vr7,r:- ,, A, LF Ta[d fYgegCori ipiese,aWW, oo5l uuUn,urc) - ."C4' Neq,raeudAO.eeyAaslem,ce: ''.l5f GC-C AWlierdtugd,.tr !� <1 !7 n ::-- Deer row orAL~t rw16,g SOWLC , Pacific Western Bank t"lpp0llQ prejQa Quttmof,: - 4 _ � A:/,r •`+., r .. Attachments • Twe (2),man t*W*Wateie d e,e p,rpeny wma w,%*v.w„wAe w,d bu ur WLd - Pra^4 stmoa w ow -(based upon N"O-I t..et) • cm a acbmamt Certification Staterllents 6CA( j-,tcT. 1/ e,e spprcard lame ee tnYaer d the TJ*4 bMWtY- r+c tnhwmg w 0knfim. must be pp,rvleted by the pmmu MA,"- ). Patricia Houk dada a under Penury :md pedwy that I am ne hw we (A," "" YA. In IMF appecatton 1 ms mdY our, (t) Iw,n,t ,. w.1ry�'t pF*Wy mated:, ede epprwaom msy be wawdcd Proarem (7),9Mhl� stgtanm,: Q�Cdld �� 3U'll3 Managing ?Member The ldiuM o etWemera nu t be t�rnpkytyoy rte tpplatm and prryxery cN r IMe admo,dadpe the ". d e,"s eppto5a, and 0"Iy ewt 41 slane .eantaeon to tme and Cones to ,be Oast o1 ,nyfaur pwuNedge end ocbcl. yy tndersemd Brea :. &d1,0, ante„eer,,,,,d Rebds AV@" w+ naan a eyna0 and aythgiAO r!y U,v L.'I�J`�M�� A9a^e7 at D n,n,anceq spy work an 1M r�M yiprcM,ne. Dale. �- �O -C7J" fie; Patricia Hook, Min ffiemb t?.dr.: please return the co,npbted XM iirarlirx,, with mquked attachments, to: City or La Quints RedevetoPmanl Aumey doDobbio powett M 495 COW Tampico La Quint9, CA 92.153 i 3 rn 0 3 1(� JrOTAL P.02 JAN-27-2003 MON 05:48PM ID:C & G Const. / La Quinta PAGE:2 yD _ice nm�A �mF-;D moco m�r0-,,MOM �3 O e O- = m-q Z < D -{ Z m n �p m m z 3 C C 0 o r Z m Z7 n R7 O r m r r y (") -� (AMC m rC*t f�T'1 D �l n'Y m� r z o z o?< m 0 �J z 1=0 M -Z- �00W;o -a zri mYG� �oZ��-i.Zmi00o�oXwo r 2�o �D��oA -<Z cm� OHO' z0 ZO <3 R■/ D� �Dx<OO-1 M�m m=Z =�fp�T77M�mM-nmzm oc➢iwW DOOm \ Z Z (7 C m W m m N 1 j z r O m'-i = Z r m C fTl N 0= OK ODO�DO� rD 0 OD ��m.< ex -izo �y0'DTlomC) Y j �r o ?0 ZDzmN r�Om2 ��00 DUI CZ 0-uCD�=n cnZc�rm C0 m r o__ M om=10 = Oo m ZD�� r_a mnm !'✓1D Zm V rn AVENIDA_BERMUDAS ad ! (CCZD))) d \\ E I / \ ._\ CD 1 0) CD o I _ ly rrl a Oj� �Fer`.O M1o� I O I J I I ` r'1 7 Or � Y Z f DESERT CLUB DRIVE - - - — -- 0 s 4 GRADING Sa PAVING, INCH Lic.#746535 15050 Cholla Road, Whitewater, CA 92282 - Phone 760-251-5113 Fax 760-251-5061 PROPOSAL 916/2002 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT: C&G Construction La Quinta Grill (Parking Area Only) 78-034 Calle Barcelona APN: 770485002 La Quinta, CA 92253 APN: 770153001 Attn: Ken West Fax: (760) 777-9372 La Quinta, CA We hereby propose to furnish the following; Equipment, Labor & Materials to: 1. Grub and clear site 2. Demolish and remove existing concrete and building slab 3. Grade site 4. Construct type A-6 curb and gutter 600 LF 5. Construct type D curb only 1325 LF 6. Construct sidewalk DWG 401 155 LF 7. Construct curb transition per detail sheet 3 5 total 8. Construct 4' wide FCC sidewalk per detail sheet 3 1570 LF 9. Construct 6' wide sidewalk per detail sheet 3 540 SF 10. Construct curb ramp per detail sheet 3 132 SF 11. Construct 3' V-gutter 290 LF 12. Install under sidewalk drain 7 total 13. Install 4.5" AB 26,124 SF 14. Install 2" AC base paving 26,124 SF NOTE: Demolish and remove existing garage $5000.00 Exclusions: Permits, Fees, Engineering, Construction Water Meter, and Soil Tests, Retaining Wall, Catch Basin, Drywall, Access Ramp and Rail (no detail), Slab at Top of Ramp (no detail). The above work is to be completed in a substantial, workmanlike manner. For the sum of: ONE HUNDRED TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED NINE DOLLARS ($128,209.00). Payment to be made upon completion. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accident or dell ys beyond our control. Workmen's Compensation and General Liability Insurance on the�bove w7Yk to be provided by Zoltan Grading & Paving, Inc. Proposal valid for 30 days only -w th exception of the asphalt material price may be adjusted according to the market. / Respectfully submitted: , ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and condition are satisfactory and are hereby accept You are authorized to do the work specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date: Signed By: -1P I U If 1 RuT II711 Pi%,,F Q � engipeen ng c4m F Iml mm 7245-loqiup inrwq� Samn ti YUMD Vol"v, CAPW84 prror (Iwyw;�7(m rax (760)399i•714(3 !b11" U(nWI, CAP-791 Pimp (100y11 ]1(11 FRX PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Project No., C 9 08 3 i,---X I Date- I/ 121,700.3 Client: La Quinta ("till By: MP Description: lmP1ovcmc"fs M. pmotic Grading Plan page: I nI I NO - DESCRIPTION CITY, UNIT I1,NlrT(',O3T-,..F4-ivNmN1 Clearing & Grubbing --- 2,5 $ s0000 AC loo ------- cy 175 1,837 SO 3 .. ..... COVIStfl)(A fi" curb & gutter 300 LF 1000 COUISM0.1 Gurb W LF Gonslnv"4"Sidewalk Construct 3- 1,770 SF 2.50 4,425.00 . 7 coaq,ruct U, nwfw14y AWronch 100 SF 1.35 19,285.00 . 8 6' G"onfen Wall SF 3.5U 1,99o. oo I-F - 40 - Oo 8,400-00. l2"PVC Storm Pipe -- ----- in install 15"Pvcslorul pipe 190 LF 25.UO it 111."all 24" PVC Stonyj Pipe 300 LF q.Do(),Q(j -- ---- 12 com"ruct so"(1 Filter 80 LF 35-Do 2,800.np 13 COnstru(I Cross Gutler I --- EA 4,500.00 4.50f) Of) 14 ------ -0011tuctUnder-sid m"lkDrain 300 _SF 3.50 1,050.0o . 400,00 4UO.()O 15 Eruskin Control AC 1,50f),00 3,750.0o 16 10,000 ... ..... SF 2.30 23. SUBiTOTAL: $118,582 TOTAL �I(` ¢ 3 1354 JET WAY 00-0200 P.O. BOX 1515 e9) 940-9192 nc PERRIS, CA 92572 NPGCont. Lic. N664779 ri ASPHALT SERVICES ESTIMATE / PROPOSAI, OUALITY We Handle All Phases of Asphalt SINCE 1965 ESTIMATE TO (Client) DATE: August 30, 2002 C & G Construction 78-034 Ca1le Barcelona PROJECT: New Asphalt. Paving La Quinta, California 92253 LOCATION: La Quinta Grill Office Park Avenida Bermudas Attention: Ken West La Quinta, California Telephone: 760-777-9362 Fax: 760-777-9372 Estimator: Richard Sherman NELSON PAVING & SEALING (hereinafter called Contractor) quotes the following estimate to Client for furnishing the material, labor and performing the work hereinafter specified, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth on reverse side of estimate. NEW CONSTRUCTION 1. Fine grade compacted native soil form (+ or -) .10' to balance in order to place base material in area approx. 30,000 (+ or -) sq. ft. 2. Furnish and place 4.5" (+ or -) of Class II base material in area approx. 30,000 (+ or -) sq. ft. 3. Furnish and place 3" (+ or -) of AR 4000 1/2" asphalt material in area approx. 30,000 (+ or -) sq. fl. in one lift. * 1f striping and signs are required additional costs will apply. Any additional square footage is to be billed at $ 1.75 per sq. ft. Total New Construction: SPECIAL CONDITIONS $52, 500.00 �U ,rl r �� NPG Corporation warranties all materials and workmanship for a period of one year. Progress billings upon completion or work; completed, Payment in full upon completion of contract work, No retention to be held. Start Date to be negotiatedupon signing of contract. - Upon acceptance of proposal, preliminary information must be provided. Payment in full upon completion of work, no retention to be held. The above unit prices area valid only for work preformed before 12/31 /02. This bid is based upon one move -in . Cost of additional moves will be negotiated as they occur. Quantities used are approximate and are subject to physical measurement and corrections, if necessary, will be made with unit prices applying. Engineering, construction surveying, testing, permits, and inspection fees by others. (Construction layout included) Terms of Client purchase order's, subcontracts, and/or credit approvals must comply with NPG Corp. standard terms and conditions and any special terms. conditions or warranties. NPG is not responsible for any damages that are caused by others, (vehicles driving or people/pets walking through barricaded areas, etc..) this will be repaired at owners expense. NPG Corp. will be held harmless for any and all trip/fall hazards. Performance bond premium is not included and a bond is requested, premium is to be paid by owner. Special conditions imposed by any permits issued to owner and not noted on the plans or specifications will not be considered in this scope of work. Compacted sub grade to be within plus or minus 0.1 foot to balance, we fine grade only. Not responsible for proper drainage of asphalt designed with less than one percent of fall. Not responsible for existing asphalt breaking up due to soft sub grade, this shall become a negotiated item. This bid does not reflect the cost of holding asphalt paving 1" low and capping later. Adjusting, and/or paving of utility valves, manholes, etc..... by others. Prime, seal, weed kill, or nick is not included. If section of paving and base changes prices will be renegotiated. Traffic control by others. Asphalt concrete to be placed in one lift(s). Customer to have someone of authority on project site at all times. Any questions regarding specifications, scope of work, or procedure will be referred to that representative. NPG will not be responsible for extra costs resulting form directions and/or changes made by an inspector and/or resident engineer. All such costs will be the responsibility of the customer. Excludes any striping, saw arcing, signs, overlays, and asphalt removals. ,TIMATED BASE BID:..... Fifty Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars And 00/100 .......... $ 52, 500.00 OTICE: The foregoing does not constitute an offer, unless the formal Proposal appearing on the reverser side hereof is igned by a duly authorized representative of contractor (see also paragraph 2 on the reverse hereof). If rough coding is one by other, it shall be furnished to us within one foot, plus or minus, of finished sub glrade elev i�r (see also PROPOSAL Proposal Date: January 22, 2003 Proposal No: 764365 i 5.501 tittle Morongo Road PROPERTY LINES: Buyershall locate and point out property lines to Tri-Star. Tri-Star may, at its option, Desert Not Springs, Califomia require buyer to provide 8li0ertsed surveyors map of the property. SITE COAID1T10NS. Tn Star is nix Bus:(760) 251-5464 Fax:(760) 251-5458 responibierorsitecorwlia'answ+disdusedprior toits work. Woraresumrg from unknown site cond!lions, License Number. 475515 (A 8 B) including utilities, rocks, pipes and septic tanks, are Buyers responsibility and will be hived as an extra. Submitted to: JOB NAME: La Quinta Grill C & G Construction Job Address: 7M34 Calle Barcelona Job Phone: 777-9362 fax.777-9372 La Quinta, CA M53 Architect: Warner Engineering Date of plans: 4/1/2002 Attn: Ken West Starting date: TBD Completion (approx.); ASAP We hereby submit specifications and estimates for equipment, labor ti material to: Install new sewer lateral to property, abandon existing septic system and connect to new sewer lateral. $9,650.00 Excludes: Engineering; surveying; state, city & utility inspection fees is permits; compaction tests. NOTE: Water and service paid by owner. Total proposal': $9,650.00 Any change to the specifications, blueprints or job itself that modifies this proposal will be billed as air extra. THIS PROPOSAL IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS ONLY, AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIED BLUEPRINTS 3 CONDITIONS, IF ANY. We propose to perform the above work in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted, and to complete it in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices for the sum of: NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS Pavment to be made as follows: Due upon completion. Contractors are regmrea oy taw roDe ncensea ano regularea oy me Lonrracrors stare License tyoaro, wnrcn nas junsaiction to investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is bled within four years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must be bled within ten years of the date of the alleged violation. Any question concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors State License Board, Post Office Box 26000, Sacramento, California 95826. The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. It Is understood and agreed that this work is not provided for in any other agreement and no contractual rights arise until this proposal Is accepted in writing. All disputes under this contract including the performance of work, shall be submitted to the American Arbitration Association with the arbitration hearing site being Palm Desert, California. The prevailing party shall be entitled to all arbitration and court costs, as well as reasonable attorney's fees. All sums are due and payable as stated above. Any unpaid sums incur interest at the rate of eighteen percent (f 8%) per annum from the date said sum is due. If any installment payment due hereunder is past due, or if Bu ter disputes an extra charge hereunder, Tri-Star may stop work. Authorized = Date ZZ Signatuwo3 Acceptance � Date JAN-22-2003 WED 04:10PM ID:C & G Const. � La Quinta PRGE:3 PROPOSAL 9i f;- ita^ 15-501 Little Morongo Road Desert Hot Springs, California Bus:(760) 251-5454 Fax:(760) 2515458 License Number: 475515 (A & B) Submitted to: C & G Construction 7&034 Calle Barcelona La Quinta, CA 92253 Proposal Date: January 22, 2003 Proposal No: 764366 PROPERTY LINES: Buyer shall locate end point out property tines to T�Sfar. 'rri-Stet rosy, of its option, require buyer to provide a licensed surveyor's map of the property. SITE CONDMONS: Trt-Sror is trot responsible for site condidorrs und=Aosed prior to its work Work resulting from unknown site mndkons, including u6Nies, rocks, pipes and se tic tanks, are Buyer's responsibi and w it be billed as an extra. JOB NAME:La Quinta Grill Job Address: Job Phone: 777-9362 fax.T77-9372 Architect: Warner Engineering Date of plans: 4/1/2002 Starting date: TBD Cainetafion IAnn . 1- Aceo Install underground storm drainage wlcatch basins, sand filter & leach line. Note: Excludes concrete/asphalt replacement. Not responsible for underground utilities. Excludes: Engineering; surveying; state, city & utility inspection fees & permits; compaction tests. NOTE: Water and service paid by owner. $23,950.00 Total proposal': $23,950.00 Any change to the specifications, blueprints or job itself that modifies this proposal will be billed as an extra. THIS PROPOSAL IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS ONLY, AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIED BLUEPRINTS & CONDITIONS, IF ANY. We propose to perform the above work in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted, and to complete it in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices for the sum of. TWENTY THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS Is investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is filed within four years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must ba filed within ten years of the date of the alleged violation. Any question concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors State License Board, Post Office Box 26000, Sacramento. California 95826. The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. It Is understood and agreed that this work Is not provided for in any other agreement and no contractual rights arise until this proposal Is accepted in writing. All disputes under this contract, including the performance of work, shall be submitted to the American Arbitration Association with the arbitration hearing site being Palm Desert, California. The prevailing party shall be entitled to all arbitration and court costs, as well as reasonable altomey's fees. All sums are due and payable as stated above. Any unpaid sums incur interest at the rate of eighteen percent (1851o) per annum from the date said sum is due. If any installment payment due hereunder is past due, or i/ Buyer disputes an extra charge hereunder, Tri-Star may stop work. Authorized Sign t _ Date � ? o� Acceptancesa Date -Z ' -G .ii n 7 r� JAN-22-2003 WED 04:10PM ID:C & G Const. / La Quinta RGE:4 8 rouco •ol*. p.� PROPOSAL Proposal Date: January 22, 2003 Proposal No: 764364 15-5011_ittle Morongo Road PROPERTYLINES: Buyer shall locate and point out property lines to Tri-Star. MStarmay, Olds option, Desert Not Springs, California, requse buyer to provide a &enwd surveyors map of the popery. siTE CONDITIONS: Td Slar is nor Bus:(760)251-5454Fax:(760)251!A58 responsibleforsiteConditorsundisciosedpnortoaswon. warnresuff komunkwro siteocriatons, License Number: 475515 (A & 8) including utilities, rocks, pipes and septic tanks, are Buyers msponsibiW and will be brAed as an extra. Submitted to: JOB NAME: La Ownta G- C & G Construction Job Address: 78-034 Calla Barcelona Job Phone: 777-9362 fax.T77-9372 La Ouinta, CA 92253 Architect: Warner Engineering Date of plans: 4/112002 Attn: Ken West Starting date: TBD Completion (approx.): ASAP We hereby submit specifications and estimates for equipment, labor & material to: Clear & grub new building site, remove trees, over -excavate building pad, replace, compact & grade per plan. $26,1360.00 Includes cutting for retention basins Excludes: Engineering; surveying; state, city & utility inspection fees & permits; compaction tests. NOTE: Water and service paid by ovmer. Total proposal': $26,850.00 Any change to the specifications, blueprints or job itself that modes this proposal will be billed as an extra. THIS PROPOSAL IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS ONLY, AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIED BLUEPRINTS & CONDITIONS, IF ANY. We propose to perform the above work in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted, and to complete it in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices for the sum of: TWENTY SIX THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS Payment to be made as follows: Due upon completion. Acceptance of Proal - The following California PreliminarV Notice information is reaired at time of Contract award Contractors are required Dy law to De tteenseo ana regulated Dy Me Contractors State License Board, which has jurisdiction to investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is riled within four years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must be filed within ten years of the date of the alleged violation. Any question concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors State License Board, Post Office Box 26000, Sacramento. California 95826. The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specked. Payment will be made as outlined above. it is understood and agreed that this work is not provided for in any other agreement and no contractual rights arise until this proposal is accepted in writing. All disputes under this contract, including the performance of work, shall be submitted to the American Arbitration Association with the arbitration hearing site being Palm Desert, California. The prevailing party shall be entitled to all arbitration and court costs, as well as reasonable attorney's fees. All sums are due and payable as stated above. Any unpaid sums incur interest at the rate of eighteen percent (19%) per annum from the date said sum is due. if any installment payment due hereunder is past due, or if Bu r di I s an extra charge hereun er, Tn-Star may stop work. Authorized _ Signature � Date y Zz o7 Acceptance Date JAN-22-2003 WED 04:09PM ID:C & G Const. r La Duinta '' 0 3 7PAGE:2 9 PROPOSAL 9�(;- AZ^ 15.501 Little Morongo Road Desert Hot Springs, California Bus:(760) 251-5454 Fax:(760) 251-5458 License Number 475515 (A & 6) Submitted to: C & G Construction 78-034 Calle Barcelona La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn- Ken West Proposal Date: January 2$ 2003 Proposal No: 764367 PROPERTYUNES: Buyer shell locate andpsintout property Imes to Tn-&U.. Tn-Starmey. etitsoptian mWm buyerto pmvde a bwnwd surveyors map afhie property SITE CONDmLNVS: TnLStar is not msponsible for age mndfrfons undisdosed poor to ifs work Work msuffing from unknown site cmdfions, including afffifies, (oaks, pipes and septic fanks, are Buyers responsibility and w if be bfNed as an Wra JOB NAME: La Quinta Grill Job Address: Job Phone: 777-9362 fax.777-9372 Architect Warner Engineering Data of plans: 4112002 Startinn data: TBD Comoletion laoorox.l: ASAP Grade for on -site parking lot and curb & gutter. Excludes importlexport of fill material. Excludes: Engineering; surveying; state, city & utility inspection fees & permits; compaction tests. NOTE: Water and service paid by owner. $18,850.00 Total proposal': $16.850.00 Any change to the specifications, blueprints oriob itself that modifies this proposal will be billed as an extra. THIS PROPOSAL IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS ONLY, AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIED BLUEPRINTS & CONDITIONS, IF ANY. We propose to perform the above work in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted, and to complete it in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices for the sum of: SIXTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS Payment to be made as follows: Due upon completion. AC6e tanC& Of Pro al - The fetiOWm GalifOmta Preamina neorR mrortnauon rs rren m Dine or wnva�cs arvaru Contractors are required bylaw to ne rfcenseu anu ragma(ev oy um w,nreo,vru o,a,o wo..,o ..-o.- ..,n.,,, ,..... r................. ... investigate complaints against contraca' if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is filed within four years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must be filed within ten years of the date of the alleged violation. Any question concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors Stale License Board, Post Office Box 26OW,, Sacramento, California 95826. The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. It Is understood and agreed that this work is not provided for in any other agreement and no contractual rights arise until this proposal is accepted in writing. AN disputes under this contract, including the performance of work shall be submitted to the American Arbitration Association with the arbitration hearing site being Palm Desert, California. The prevailing party shall be erifltled to all arbitration and court costs, as well as reasonable attomWs fees. AN sums are due andpayable as stated above. Any unpaid sums incur Interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum fmm the date said sum is dueif any installment payment due hereunder is past due, orifBu (disputes an extra charge hereunder, Tri-Star may stop work Authorized Signs — --_ Date/ L 7 2 Acceptance Date_ JAN-22-2003 WED 04:11PM ID:C & G Const. / La Quinta 038 10 PAGE:5 ATTACHMENT 2 FINDING CRITERIA WORKSHEET BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS: This includes the reconstruction or removal and replacement of structurally unsound or non- conforming uses (i.e. signs), and other improvements that enhance the general appearance of the subject property. 50 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score SCALE AND QUALITY OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS: This may include the reconstruction or removal and replacement of signs, .awnings/canopies, exterior wall finishes, doors and windows, decorative roof treatments, and landscaping to the entrance and visible sides; of the subject property. Sensitivity to adjacent land uses must be considered. )5 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT: Proposed improvements must make the Project Area more attractive and visible to customers, neighboring merchants, and residents. Special consideration of up to 10 additional points will be provided for those improvements related to the creation of new businesses, or the expansion or relocation of existing businesses within the Project Area. 10 Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score OTHER: This may include improvements related to historic preservation, unique structural and site -design, and the promotion of cultural, educational, and/or recreational opportunities. —1Q-- Scale 0-10 points x Category Weight = weighted score APPLICANT MATCHING FUNDS: Applicants may receive up to 5 points for exceeding the required 10% applicant funding match. Scale 0-5 points x Category Weight = weighted score Total of all weighted scores: _ divide by 10 =__ (FINAL SCORE) (70 points required to receive funding) 03q I g I �• ii Y u 46, 5 � � Y' t u, t �i� A.•m u e ke o,it AYL r,t {