Loading...
2004 11 03 ALRCARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA A Regular Meeting to be Held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California NOVEMBER 3, 2004 10:00 A.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2004-032 I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call II. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes for October 6, 2004. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Item ....................... VILLAGE USE PERMIT 2004-025 Applicant ................ Desert Builders Inc. Location ................. North side of Calle Amigo, one lot east of Avenida Bermudas. Request .................. A review of architectural and landscaping plans for three live/work spaces in The Village at La Quinta. Action .................... Minute Motion 2004- .W,uut,00I ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE VI VII VIII. B. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2004-817 Applicant ................ Bill Sanchez Location ................. Bounded by Highway 111, Avenue 47, Washington Street and Adams Street Request .................. A review of architectural and conceptual landscaping plans for three commercial buildings within Washington park Commercial Center (Pad 4 and 6, and revised Shop 3). Action .................... Minute Motion 2004- C. Item ....................... SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2004-818 Applicant ................ La Quinta Partners North Location ................. Southwest corner of Westward Ho Drive and Roadrunner Lane Request .................. A review of architectural and landscaping plans for two new prototype residential units with two facades each. Action .................... Minute Motion 2004- D. Item ....................... TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32397 Applicant ................ Foxx Horns Location ................. West side of Washington Street, north of Laguna de la Paz Request .................. A review of preliminary landscaping plans for Washington Street perimeter Action .................... Minute Motion 2004-_ CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS ADJOURNMENT d.uuu002 ALRC/AGENDA ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee meeting of Wednesday, August 4, 2004, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico, the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post Office bulletin board, and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, October 29, 2004. DATED: October 29, 2004 BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California .•.0'j 003 ALRC/AGENDA MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A Regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA October 6, 2004 10:00 a.m. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:04 a.m. by Principal Planner Stan Sawa who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Frank Christopher, and David Thoms. C. Staff present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planners Wallace Nesbit and Martin Magana, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of September 8, 2004. There being no changes, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to approve the Minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2004-812; a request of Chick-Fil-A for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a restaurant with a drive -through located on the north side of Highway 1 1 1 , east of Adams Street in the Pavilion at La Quinta Center. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Debra Kerr, Kerr Project Services, and Greg Lollis, with Chick-Fil-A, project representatives, who gave a presentation on the project. G:\WPD0CS\ALRC\10-6-04 WD.doc o4ri'i 004 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee October 6, 2004 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there was a way to make a provision for the developer's landscaping plans be noted to address the landscaping for the screening of the drive through so this will be picked up. Are there any other drive-throughs? Staff stated yes, and it will have a similar landscaping issue. Mr. Lollia explained the reason for the long drive through is to separate the drive through first for safety and second to remove it from the Center's circulation pattern. 3. Committee Member Christopher asked if the berming/landcaping to screen the drive through was a requirement prior to opening. Staff stated yes, it is a condition of approval. 4. Committee Member Thorns recommended berming be required. Staff stated the developer is required to include berming, but staff is unaware of the exact location. Committee Member Thorns stated the Crepe Myrtle trees should be replaced with a tree that will be green more often. Mr. Lollia stated they would refer the Committee's recommendation to the landscape architect. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt noted the Crepe Myrtle tree is beautiful, but agreed it will be bare from November to April. He stated the Melalucas may be a better tree. The beds proposed where the Crepe Myrtle are proposed shows a planter five feet wide, the width of the planting island will create problems later on if it is not wide enough. If it were possible in the future, he would ask that the developers provide a wider planting strip. 6. Committee Member Christopher asked how consistent the colors are with the main building. Staff stated they are consistent. Committee Member Christopher stated the plans shows the window sill caps and other capping details as interior and exterior. This could be a reflection problem if it is not brushed stainless steel. Mr. Lollia stated they typically are a bronze, anodized treatment. Committee Member Christopher stated he would prefer it is the same treatment as the main buildings. 7. Committee Member Thorns stated that if the Highway 111 landscaping plans do not cover the drive through, a short wall could be used. Staff stated that will be an option. G:AWPDOCSVALRCA70-6-04WD.doc �A.#JJ 005 2 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee October 6, 2004 8. Committee Member Bobbitt asked that the berming be pushed away from the drive -through. He then asked what material would be used on the trellis over the drive -through. Ms. Kerr stated they propose the glu-Ism beams. 9. Committee Member Christopher stated his concern regarding the location of the trash enclosure at the main entry to the Center. The strip in front of it should be buffered with planting. Mr. Lollia stated they would see that it is planted whether or not it is on their property or in the common area. 10. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2004-028 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2004-812, as recommended by staff and amended: a. Condition added: All exterior window and door sills shall match the rest of the Center. b. Condition added: An alternative evergreen to the Crepe Myrtle trees shall be used. C. Condition added: Any wood trellis material shall be pressure treated. Unanimously approved. B. Site: Development Permit 2004-814; a request of Rich Entin Family Trust/Ware Malcomb Architects for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a ±23,760 square foot two-story general office building on a located at 43-576 Washington Street, on the east side approximately 960 feet north of Fred Waring Drive. 1. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Cesar Romero, applicant, who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Christopher asked if it was a tilt -up building. Mr. Romero stated . yes. Committee Member Christopher asked if there was any added material used to give dimension to the building. Staff stated there is a dimensional aspect. G:\WPD0CS\ALRC\10-6-04 WD.doc .4.0IJ 006 3 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee October 6, 2004 3. Committee Member Thorns stated it is a rectangular building with very little detail. It needs to be given more detail. Staff noted the Washington Street setback which does restrict the development of the building. Mr. Romero explained the details on the building. 4. Committee Member Christopher stated the south and rear do show more detail than what fronts onto Washington Street. Mr. Romero stated a different color scheme may help as well. In addition, there is an entry trellis which has columns to add detail. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the roofline is what needs articulation. He would like to see some vertical relief on the roof plane. He asked if the windows have any reveal. Mr. Romero stated they will be set back with beveled angles. 6. Committee Member Christopher asked if the main floor archways were recessed. Mr. Romero stated they are recessed with tile accents as well as lush landscape plants. 7. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he agreed with staff's recommendation to have the Chilean Mesquite trees replaced with a different variety. 8. Committee Member Christopher asked if there was an overlay on the east elevation as to what is sitting behind this building. Staff stated the middle school is proposed in that location. Mr. Romero stated that on the east elevation they have created seating areas. The windows are designed so they could be converted to French doors. Committee Member Christopher suggested they go with a three color mixed roof tile to break up the roof. Also, the precast architectural details on the staircase need to be added to the east elevation between the archway windows. 9. Committee Member Thoms stated the entry could be enhanced. Mr. Romero stated they did not want to accentuate the entry as it was unknown who the tenants may be which could create different entries. 10. Committee Member Christopher suggested the center of the roof be pitched up. G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\l0-13-04 WD.doc e+�l� (� 0 0 7 4 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee October 6. 2004 11. Committee member Thoms stated he could not support the project as submitted as the blocky articulation needs to be addressed. 12. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Christopher to adopt Minute Motion 2004-02029 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2004-814, as recommended by staff and amended. a. Condition added: Something is to be added to break up the roof line by pitching the center of the roof over the main entry area. b. Condition added: A different variety of tree shall be used instead of the Chilean mesquite. C. Condition added: Architecture precast detailing on the east elevation similar to that on the south side, shall be added d. Condition added: The roof tiles shall be a three color mix. Unanimously approved. C. Site; Development Permit 2004-815; a request of John Vuksic for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for a single story, 10,000 square foot office building on a 0.83 acre site located on the west side of Caleo Bay, approximately 270 feet north of Avenue 48. 1. Associate Planner Martin Magana presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced John Vuksic and Jon Gray, who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Christopher asked if the bright orange was proposed to pick up the color of the Walgreens store. Staff stated the desire was to have a continuation of the architecture and colors in this area. 3. Committee Member Thoms stated that on the north elevation the stone should wrap around the tower. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he has no objection to the project. He asked about the size of the parking lot tree islands. Staff noted the Code requirement has not been amended to require the 8-feet by 8-feet. G:\WPDOCS\ALRCU 0-6-04 WD.doc ..11.00i n o s 5 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee October 6, 2004 5. Committee Member Christopher noted the elevation facing Avenue 48 needs special attention given to the landscaping to buffer the view corridor for the homes to the south. He asked if there was a lighting plan submitted. Mr. Gray stated the lighting was already installed on the site and any additional fixtures needed would be the same. 6. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2004-030 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2004-815, as recommended and amended: Condition added: Center tower shall have stone added. Unanimously approved. D. Site Development Permit 2004-816; a request of K. Hovnanian Hornes/Forecast Homes for consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for three prototypical residential plans for Tentative Tract Map 30092 located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. 1. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff introduced Steve Chaparro and Angela Wilson, of Forecast Homes, who gave a presentation on the project. 2. Committee Member Thorns asked why there were no swimming pools. Mr. Chaparro stated they typically do not show a pool. Committee member Thorns asked if the developer's responsibility was only to landscape the front yard. Mr. Chaparro stated yes, the rear yard is the property owners. 3. Committee member Bobbitt asked if there was a HOA and what was their responsibility. Mr. Chaparro explained. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the Phoenix should be planted away from any traffic area. They should be nursery grown or inspected by the landscape architect before installation. He then asked about the retention basins. GAWPD0CS\ALRC\10-6-04 WD.doc _4.() tj 1 0 0 9 6 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee October 6, 2004 4. Committee Member Christopher asked what would be used to cover the retention basin. Ms. Wilson stated wildflowers. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated wildflowers will deteriorate and become infested with weeds and be a maintenance problem. He would suggest an alternative be used. 6. Committee Member Thoms asked about the trees at the main entrance. Mr. Chaparro stated they would have to refer to the landscape architect. 7. Committee Member Bobbitt went over the proposed plant list and made recommendations. 8. Committee Member Thorns asked about the perimeter wall. Mr. Chaparro stated it was a combination of precision and split face block with horizontal banding. Color is yet to be determined. 9. There being no further questions of the applicant, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Christopher to adopt Minute Motion 2004-031 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2004-816, as recommended and amended by staff. a. Condition added: remove Mesquite trees and use alternative seed mix for hydroseeding retention basins. b. Condition added: final review of block wall shall be by the Planning Commission for color contrast. c. Condition added: Plan 3 shall have a three color mix roof. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Christopher/Thoms to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on November 3, 2004. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1 : 41 a.m. on September 8, 2004. G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\10-6-04 WD.doc •.d.n 11 ' 010 7 Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee October 6, 2004 Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER Executive Secretary G:\WPDOCS\ALRC\70-6-04 WD.doc 8 nf)• 1 ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 CASE NO: VILLAGE USE PERMIT 2004-025 APPLICANT: DESERT BUILDERS INC. ARCHITECT: GLS, CHARLES F. GARLAND, ARCHITECT REQUEST: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THREE LIVE/WORK SPACES IN THE VILLAGE AT LA QUINTA LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF CALLE AMIGO, ONE LOT EAST OF AVENIDA BERMUDAS (ATTACHMENT 1) Please review the attached information for the November 3, 2004 ALRC meeting. BACKGROUND The project is proposed for a 15,258 square foot lot on the north side of Calle Amigo, one lot east of Avenida Bermudas. The applicant proposes a tri-plex "live/work" building, with office space closest to Calle Amigo, and living areas on the north half of the lot. The residential units are proposed to be two story in height, while the office space and garage are single story. A single car garage is provided for each unit, with two additional uncovered parking spaces adjacent to Calle Amigo. The building footprint, including the living space, office and garage areas, totals 6,423 square feet. The: center unit is proposed to provide 2,510 square feet of living space on two levels, and the two outer units 2,341 square feet, also on two levels. The offices are each 457 square feet, and a 260 square foot garage is provided each unit. The architectural style proposed is Mediterranean, with tile roofs on both the single and two story structures. Wall finishes are proposed to be stucco, with multi -paned French doors and wrought iron fences for the offices. By necessity, garage doors will need to be of the roll -up type. Although expansive windows are provided on the facade of each unit, veiry limited architectural detail has been provided for the sides and rear of the structures. It is recommended that the applicant be required to include window pop -outs, mullions, or raised banding on these elevations, to provide some architectural interest to these areas of the buildings. A courtyard is provided for each unit, including a spa and landscaping. The courtyard areas are shielded by the office and garage spaces on the front, and the residential units on the back of the lot. A rear entry to each unit will lead to a small back lawn area, which will 1provide a total of 1,000 square feet of rear yard for all the units. Although walls separating the courtyards are shown, their material is not detailed. It is recommended that the applicant be required to construct stucco or stuccoed slumpstone walls between each unit and around the perimeter of the site. No landscaping is shown on the project site plan for the parking area, although the rendering does show flowering shrubs in this area. Since the space between each parking space is only about two feet, it is recommended that the area between the open space and front perimeter wall be landscaped with a vertical element, in the form of shade trees. Landscaping within the courtyards will consist of Mediterranean fan palms and bottle trees, both proposed to be 36" box in size. Landscaping in the back yards will consist of lawn, 24" box citrus and bottle trees. Village Design Guidelines The proposed project, being within the boundaries of the Village, must be evaluated for conformance to the Village Design Guidelines. In this regard, the project meets several of the stated guidelines, including: 1 . Land uses in The Village shall include residential mixes, at densities as set forth by the General Plan. Uses which are 100% residential are permissible. In general, residential uses shall locate above commercial uses in common buildings, or may be located in stand-alone multi -family residential buildings. 2. Building mass and scale shall be compatible with that of surrounding structures. 3. Buildings shall be designed with appropriate architectural variation and detailing to break up monotonous building elevations. Treatments such as graduated heights, balconies, recessed and extended building sections, staggered setbacks, etc. should be employed. 4. Structures shall be sited to create internal spaces, with pedestrian access available from the street or off-street parking areas. 5. Entries; into shops and offices shall access directly to a pedestrian oriented street or other pedestrian access; single access multiple tenant buildings should be discouraged. The applicant is proposing a design which reduces the massing of the buildings closest to the street, making the project more pedestrian -friendly, while providing a mix of land uses which will allow residents to work where they live, an integral concept of the Village. ..•..1:: 013 RECOMMENDATION The Architecture and Landscape Review Committee recommend to the Planning Commission approval of Village Use Permit 2004-025 subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1 . A 36" box shade tree and a stable groundcover shall be included between each parking space on the front of the building; 2. The west, east and north sides of all buildings shall be detailed with window pop outs, raised mullions or banding which provides relief from the flat planes of the structure; 3. Walls between units shall be 6 feet in height, and of stuccoed slumpstone or similar solid decorative surface; 4. A 6 foot hiigh solid wall of stuccoed slumpstone or similar decorative surface shall be required on the west, north and east property lines, outside the front setback boundaries. Transmitted by: CAM `JC1AAlTA -6 Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner 04 C� o� cFMOFTI��� ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2004-817 APPLICANT: BILL SANCHEZ, PROJECT MANAGER ARCHITECT: KKE, ARCHITECTS REQUEST: ARCHITECTURAL AND CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THREE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS WITHIN WASHINGTON PARK COMMERCIAL CENTER (PAD 4 & 6, AND REVISED SHOP 3) LOCATION: BOUNDED BY HIGHWAY 111, AVENUE 47, WASHINGTON STREET AND ADAMS STREET Members of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee, attached are plans and elevations for this proposal for your review, comment, and discussion at the meeting (Attachment 1)• PROJECT PROPOSAL: The proposed architectural design is similar in style to all the buildings in the commercial center, and is consistent with the Washington Park Specific Plan. The buildings are proposed to have flat roofs with uncomplicated and varied roof lines with deep set multi -paned windows. Exterior wall materials consist of smooth exterior plaster with stone veneer accents. Building masses are accentuated by deep-set openings, reveals, inset detailing, and human scale features. Roof lines are distinctive, and vary by the use of multiple parapet heights and setback screening elements. Colors are compatible with other building in Washington Park and consistent with the Specific Plan. PAReports - ALRC\11-3-04\Washington 111\ALRC SDP 2004-817.doc :. 015 The Landscape Concept Plan provides a visual layout of street, building and parking lot landscaping with conceptual drawings and details of landscape treatment for a typical building elevation, entryways, parking and street frontages. The landscaping plan provides a palette of plant material for shrubs, groundcover, parking lot(s) and buildings. Ground cover materials are to enhance the appearance of the project, protect soils from erosion and used to screen undesirable areas such as trash enclosures. Water efficient landscaping materials, including native plants are provided. Staff has no issues with this proposal. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of architectural and landscape plans for Site Development Permit 2004-818. Transmitted by: Fred Baker, Principal Planner Attachment 1. Development plans P:\Reports - ALRC\11-3-04\Washington 111\ALRC SDP 2004-817.doc *. i' 016 BI #C � T O4 y OA s ot xA QUM& S ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2004-818 APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: LA QUINTA PARTNERS NORTH ARCHITECT: DANIELIAN ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: URBAN HABITAT AND REQUEST: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR TWO NEW PROTOTYPE RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH TWO FACADES EACH LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WESTWARD HO DRIVE AND ROADRUNNERLANE Members of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee, attached are the plans and elevations for this proposal for your review, comment, and discussion at the meeting (Attachment 1). PROJECT PROPOSAL Tentative Tract Map 31816 was approved by the City Council on March 16, 2004 by adoption of Resolution 2004-37 for the subdivision of 26 residential lots on 7.75 acres located at the southwest corner of Westward Ho Drive and Roadrunner Lane in north La Quinta. Site Development Permit 2004-818 proposes architectural and landscape plans for two prototypical units with two facades each. P:\Reports - ALRC\11-3-04\La Quinta Partners North\ALRC SDP 2004-818.doc 017 The proposed floor plans provide 3,060 square feet and 3,070 square feet of livable space on lots generally measuring 76 feet wide by 137 feet long. Proposed materials include stucco exterior surfaces and concrete tile roofing. Each plan type has two facade design treatments that include variation in window sizes and shapes, and other distinct but unifying features such as decorative composite shutters and decorative vents. Pitched roofs in varied heights, up to 20 feet in height, include enhanced tower features over front door entrances. Building color schemes are primarily variations of white and brown plaster with dark accent colors. Exterior material and color sample board will be available at the meeting; color copies are attached. A front yard production landscaping plan has been submitted consisting of two street trees per lot accented with a variety of shrubs. Trees used for the project are Blue Palo Verde, Desert Ironwood, African Sumacs, and Elderica Pine. Plant materials are appropriate for this climate. Staff recommends the deciduous shrub, Barbados Pride, be replaced with an evergreen shrub. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of architectural and landscape plans for Site Development Permit 2004-818, as conditioned. Transmitted by: Fred Baker, Principal Planner Attachment: Development plans P:\Reports - ALRC\11-3-04\La Quinta Partners North\ALRC SDP 2004-818.doc w..J u 018 BI #D Coll T � C�n s S ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 CASE NO.: PERIMETER LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 32397 APPLICANT; FOXX HOMES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: H.S.A. DESIGN GROUP REQUEST: REVIEW PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR WASHINGTON STREET PERIMETER LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET, NORTH OF LAGUNA DE LA PAZ (FORMERLY LA QUINTA ART'S FOUNDATION SITE) Please find attached landscape plans and for this proposal for your review comment, and discussion at the meeting. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Proposed is the preliminary perimeter landscape plans for Tentative Tract 32397 located on the west side Washington Street, north of Laguna de la Paz. The package includes conceptual landscape plans and plant palette, entry feature, and cross sections of the landscape area. The applicant proposes a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover with earth mounding, synthetic rocks, and a perimeter retaining wall. The landscape palette includes Mexican fan palms, acacias, Palo Verde, desert willow, ironwood, mesquite, and smoke trees. Proposed is a meandering landscape setback (average 20 foot) with a meandering wall and sidewalk adjacent to proposed retention areas located inside the gated community. The proposed wall functions as a retaining wall as well as a privacy and noise barrier wall. The proposed entry design into the proposed project of 74 residential lots, makes a dramatic and unique statement with the use of lush landscaping, earth mounding, and :synthetic rocks as high as 20 feet with transponder activated metal gates for vehicle; access. P:\Reports - ALRC\11-3-04\Foxx Homes\ALRC rpt perimeter lscp.TT 32397.doc A. 019 1A RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission approval of preliminary perimeter landscape plans for Tentative Tract 32397. Transmitted by: Fred Baker, Principal Planner P:\Reports - ALRC\11 3-04\Foxx Homes\ALRC rpt perimeter Iscp.TT 32397.doc 020 2 0 .r_ 11