The URL can be used to link to this page

0204-035 (CSCS)LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professionals Code, and my License is in full force and effect. License # Lic. Class Exp. Date a, 685a 5 C'k �STi Y ..,y . 6)91""1012t Dat eK- , r �` �° Signature of Contractor �f ►/ r"�-- d` OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the ontractor's License Law for the following reason: ( ) I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business & Professionals Code). ( ) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to,construct,the project (Sec. 7044, Business & Professionals Code). ( ) I am exempt under Section , B&P.C. for this reason Date Signature of Owner WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: ( ) I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. ,(<')� I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier & policy no. are: Carrier- STAE F101*N i Policy No. 1603616-02 (This section need not be completed if the permit valuation is for $100.00 or less). ( )' I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and agree that if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section "3700 of the Labor Code, I,,s all forthwith comply with hr" seep ov sions. �/)��,,,� Warning: Fai ure to secure Workers' Compensation co�erage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fi es up to $100,000, in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provide for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest and attorney's fees.. - IMPORTANT Applicationris hereby made to the Director of Building and Safety for a permit subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth ",on his application. 1. Each person upon whose behalf this application -is made & each person at whose request and for whose benefit work is -performed under orpursuant to any permit issued as a result of this applicaton agrees to, & shall, indemnify & hold harmless the City of La Quinta, its officers, agents and employees'- 2. mployees'2. Any permit issued as a result of this application becomes null and void if� D work is not commenced within 180 days from date of issuance of, such permit, or cessation of work for 180 days will subject permit to cancellation{. I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information i correct. I agree to.comply with all City, and State laws relating to the buildin construction, and _hereby authorize representatives of this City to enter upo the above-mentioned property for ni spection purposes. Signature (Owner/Agent) �'> Date # BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT# Y �f�f�l DATE VALUATION, LOT TRACT P3 FM 3434' JOB SITE ADDRESS 78-71010VY 111 APN OWNER CONTRACTOR / DESIGNER / EN (NEER OKE—MAINOKE-MAINVIN 1.A QUNTA, LLC I= DEV., INC dba :l:'; ES31M.T +_'N.1IEB :LtI: . 11. QLD&I• 'I19AA CSX i $_600 Iucy"H+aV'AY I I I RMICI3:0 MMAGE CA 92.270 LA QVINTA CA 92253 (160r771-3145 CIX 2180 USE OF PERMIT COMMERCIAL - 4,600 SQ. FT. RETAIL f3UlL.1aiNC'I (BIG 5 ; I✓OEd.mo CfoODS) PlFws vcleese urn P, D. RFPTDVUI. POR.CIIIPATIO 300,00 SF SPRINKLER 10,400.00 $r. A/C: -- COMMERCIAL 900.00 911 C011`x.MCT A.M<913NT 360,PX.l)0 I's \ d(SyyOWay)i3&SIC OF CyJY9MrnO£ N '3.011�� .00 ,� CONSIMUCTION 1�',1' 101 -000-418-000 x+3,798.114 PLAN C<".tIMI: )`TE 101-000-439.3M $1,3241.69 FEE DRPOSTi1' MECHANICAL VIM 1 ¢gip -a 4V 1-000 Vag, so ELECTRICAL '193sE 101 a tx00-420.000 51291.; 0 FL.rpNSINO FRE 101-lJt3Q 419-000 S'I'JCOM MOT IUK FER - COMM 100a000-24 1-000 $90,42 1.Ir:tifI.ADPER ]IMPACT lam .drR'I PH I'UI341C ITL4W -• Whill 270-000.445.000 $2,152,90 I:11(:WXYA,i C01,Tl'rRZii:'I°I:d; N AND PLAN CHUM $25,144,51 Uss TRE:-PAIDRIM9 41,500.00 c� (�I ct; i� F,CITY0FLA QIIINTA , FINANCE DEFT: EF�'CETPIT-_ DATE, BY, DATE NA D INSP OR INSPECTION RECORD OPERATION I DATE I INSPECTOR BUILDING APPROVALS Set Backs Forms & Footings • O Slab Grade Steel Roof DeckLW3 O.K. to Wrap Framing p Insulation Fireplace P.L. Fireplace T.O. Party Wall Insulation Party Wall Firewall Exterior Lath �6 Drywall - Int. Lath 8 Final BLOCKWALL APPROVALS Set Backs Final PLUMBING APPROVALS Waste Lines (7=� Water Piping Plumbing Top Out Shower Pans Sever Lateral Sewer Connection Gas Piping Gas Test Final ELECTRICAL APPROVALS Temp. Power Pole Underground Conduit OPERATION DATE INSPECTOR MECHANICAL APPROVALS Underground Ducts Ducts Return Air Combustion Air Exhaust Fans F.A.U. Compressor Vents Grills Fans & Controls Electric Bond Main Drain Approval to Cover Equipment Location Underground Electric Underground Plbg. Test' Gas Piping Gas Test Electric Final Heater Final Plumbing Final Equipment Enclosure O.K. for Finish Plaster COMMENTS: - SPAS Low Voltage Wiring - Fixtures Main Service Sub Panels Exterior Receptacles G.F.I. Smoke Detectors Temp. Use of Power 'Final / /94 Utility Notice (Perm) r F1�C�i'�?t"�i"�1�; �'�7'S:'fy��'"'1'�r��i`^'`r��''�>a'�""'�' _ 'ri6+.;'��'.'`",�r"SY� F t�r`^�j+�t�`�fs'"��'�'rx,�.-«•Cl7t. • oZo Y- 03J BOX 1504 APPLICATION ONLY Building `' ,! 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO Address -70,710 i"'� Y �+ LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Mailing ,! L� Address _7 1C%e>°t "1 . +Q ✓1�+ ;,off City Zip Tel. R I M 1 ,9 7_7Z `70 1141 ' --111`9 7 Contractor City Zip Tel. U t 4r �� . l State Lic. City ,. & Classif. 7(,�,$ ':_7q FE -. Lic. q Arch., Engr., Designer ' � C A Address Tel. Cityt IZip State Lic. q LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I,hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor'sLicense Law for -the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5,Business and Professions Code: Any city or county' which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any'structure, prior toils issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or lhat.he is exempt therefrom, and the basis fm, healleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 Dy, 'any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500): t: I;',as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will r?do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Buisness and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building orimprovement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.) I1 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to con- struct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law.) 1-1 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason Date Owner WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policy No. Company F] Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation Or less.) I certify that in the performance of thg work. for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY Ihereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code.) Lender's Name Lender's Address This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives -of this city to enter the above. mentioned property for inspection purposes. Signature of applicant Date Mailing Address City, State, Zip BUILDING: TYPE"CONST. :JIA 1�? (?GCC. GRP. 1� A.P. Number�4�" zu po 1 Legal Description M4&4 -✓ ar' P H I Project Description IN --•- 01 % 15 Sq. Ft. No. No. Dw. Size 9Stories Units NewX Add ❑ Alter O Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ WHITE = FINANCE YELLOW = APPLICANT PINK = BUILDING DIVISION Estimated Valuation PERMIT AMOUNT Plan Chk. Dep. Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical Plumbing S.M.I. Grading Driveway Enc. 0 Infrastructure leeo • N TOTAL REMARKS ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from Center Line Side Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Issued by: Date Permit Validated by: Validation: WHITE = FINANCE YELLOW = APPLICANT PINK = BUILDING DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Desert Sands Unified School District 47950 Dune Palms Road Date 8/28/02 La Quinta, CA 92253 No. 23537 (760) 771-8515 Owner ' ONe-Eleven La Quinta, LLC R Address 46753 Adams Street CityLa Quinta Zip 92253 Tract # PM30147 •� cS�1TU;l%&o 0 Q BERMUDA DUNES r rn RANCHO MIRAGE d INDIAN WELLS PALM DESERT ,y LA QUINTA �INDIO APN # 643-220-003 Jurisdiction La Quinta Permit # Study Area Type Commercial No. of Units 1 Lot # No. Street S.F. Lot # No. Street S.F. Unit 1 78710 Highway 111 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Comments 9600 Unit 6 Unit 7 Unit 8 Unit 9 Unit 10 At the present time, the Desert Sands Unified School District does not collect fees on garages/carports, covered patios/walkways, residential additions under 500 square feet, detached accessory structures (spaces that do not contain facilities for living, sleeping, cooking, eating or sanitation) or replacement mobile homes. It has been determined that the above-named owner is exempt from paying school fees at this time due to the following reason: Commercial Building EXEMPTION NOT APPLICABLE This certifies that school facility fees imposed pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 and Government Code 65995 Et Seq. in the amount of $0.34 X 9,600 S.F. or $3,264.00 have been paid for the property listed above and that building permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy for this square footage in this proposed project may now be issued. Fees Paid By OC Wells Fargo - Dave Smoley Check No. 0737703472 Name on the check . Telephone 760/771-3345 Funding Commercial By Dr. Doris Wilson Superintendent Fee collected !exempted by C stat Scott $3,264.00 $0.00 Payment Recd Over/Under Signature f NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), this will serve to notify you that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest the fees or other payment identified above will begin to run from the date on which the building or installation permit for this project is issued, or from the date on which those amounts are paid to the District(s) or to another public entity authorized to collect them on the Districirs) behalf, whichever is earlier. NOTICE: This Document NOT VALID if Duplicated Embossed Original - Building Department/Applicant Copy - Applicant/Receipt Copy - Accounting YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICES Engineering Architecture•Surveying• Building & Safety Services Letter of Transmittal • k To: City of La Quinta Date: 08/26/02 Project: 78-710 Hwy 111 J. Big 5 Attn: Ed Randall PC #: 0204-035(2" Check) Tel No.: (760) 777-7012 Tract No.: We are forwarding: x By Messenger By E -Mail Your Pickup No. of Copies Descriptidn: 1 Set of redlined plans 1 New set 1 New struct Calc 1 Struct. Calc, redlined Comments: Plans are acceptable. Thanks This Material Sent for: Your Files Per Your Request Your Review x Approval Checking At the request of: Other By: Eric A. Frenzel Phone # 342-9214 • 47-159 Youngs Lane Indio, CA 92201 (760) 342-9214 Bronz Young W_ 7 11 � 1 , , I q.1��11lf� CITY OF I -A 01JINTA JUL 01 RECD P.O. Box 1504BUILDING ANUZZ)AFETY jj 78-495 CALLS TAMPICO (760) 777-7000 ShinigBrighter Than Ever LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX (760) 777-7101 July 1, 2002 Mr. Michael Shovlin Desert Cities Development Company 46753'/2 Adams. Street- * . La Quinta, California 92253 SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON SDP 2002-741 (BIG 5) Dear Mr. Shovlin: The Planning Commission at its meeting of June 25, 2002, adopted Resolution 2002- 069, approving your request for the above noted application for jBi—5_.,Spsrting CG-oodst subject to conditions of approval. Attached is a copy .of the applicable Resolution and conditions of approval. This action is final unless appealed to the City Council within 15 days of the action. Please contact us should you wish to.appeal. If you have -any questions, please contact me at (760) 777-7064. Sincerely, JERRY HERMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR STAN B. SAWA Principal Planner enclosures c: Buil,ding_and_Safety Department Public Works Department p:\stan\Itr app sdp 2002-741.wpd C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF . A 9,600± SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING IN THE ONE -ELEVEN LA 'QUINTA SHOPPING CENTER CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-741 APPLICANT: MICHAEL SHOVLIN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 25th day of June , 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing, to consider the request of. MICHAEL SHOVLIN to approve the development plans for a 6,900± square feet commercial building inthe One -Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center, located on the north side of Highway 111, east of Washington street, more particularly described as: PORTION OF APN 643-220-002 and -003 WHEREAS, the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee, on June 5, '2002, at a regular meeting, adopted Minute Motion 2002-023, recommending approval of the architectural plans for the new building, subject to conditions; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. The General Plan designates the project area as Regional Commercial. The proposed commercial buildings are consistent with the commercial designation of the property. 2. The proposed commercial building is designed to comply with the Zoning Code requirements, including but not limited to, height limits, parking, lot coverage, and signs. 3 The La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that the request has been assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 89- 150 (State Clearinghouse Number 90020162, prepared for Specific Plan 89- 014, which was certified on April 17, 1990. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed, or new information has been submitted which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental review. p:\stan\sdp 2002-729 pc res.wpd Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 _. Michael Shovlin - Big 5 Site Development Permit 2002-741 Adopted: June 25, 2002 4. The architectural design of the project, including but not limited to the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements are compatible . with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The building is a well designed with articulation on the front and rear elevations, and is conditioned to provide additional treatment on the east side of the building. The project uses architectural features, colors, and materials to match the surrounding existing buildings. 5. The site design of the project, including but. not limited to project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed building is located on an area that is designated for a commercial building. 6. Project landscaping, including but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials has been designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, and complement the surrounding project area, ensuring lower maintenance and water use. While there is not a lot of opportunity to provide .landscaping, the recommended small planters around some of the arcade columns will soften the facade. 7. The one building sign will be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and centers sign, program, and will be in harmony .and visually related to the proposed buildings, with the approval of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case: 2. That it does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2002-741 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached conditions. p:\stan\sdp 2002-729 pc res.wpd Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Michael Shovlin - Big 5 Site Development Permit 2002-741 Adopted: June 25, 2002 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular. meeting of the La Quinta City Planning Commission, held on the 25"' day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins; Tyler, and Chairman Abels NOES:- None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California p:\stan\sdp 2002-729 pc res.wpd Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Conditions of Approval - Final Site Development Permit 2002-741 Michael Shovlin (Big 5) Adopted: June 25, 2002 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack,.set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, actionor proceeding and shall cooperate fully -in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: . • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting the improvement plans for City approval. 3. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 4. - Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire, or confer, those easements, and other property rights necessary for the construction and/or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services, and for -the maintenance, construction .and reconstruction of essential improvements. 5. Prior to issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall provide documentation to assure that the parking lots have been or will be included within the previously recorded "Common Area Maintenance Agreement". P:VSTAN\sdp 2002-741 pc coa.wpd Printed July 1, 2002 Page 1 of 7 r Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Conditions of Approval - Final , Site Development Permit 2002-741 Michael Shovlin (Big 5) Adopted: June 25, 2002 - 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, mailbox clusters, and common areas shown on the Site Development Permit. 7. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, ingress/egress, or other encroachments will occur. 8. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of this Site Development Permit and the date of final acceptance of the on and off-site improvements for this Site Development Permit, unless such easement is.approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer,". "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 9. . Improvement plans shall be prepared by 'or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 10. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by .the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared ata larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Site Development Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal B. Site Utility Plan: 1 " 20' Horizontal C.. Site Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal Other 'engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. P:\STAN\sdp 2002-741 pc coa.wpd Printed July 1, 2002 Page 2 of7 I Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Conditions of Approval - Final Site Development Permit 2002-741 Michael Shovlin (Big 5) Adopted: June 25, 2002 "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades. for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. . "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage . systems. 1 1 . The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. Fora fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from'the City. PARKING LOTS 12. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 (Parking). The applicant shall provide accessible parking stalls as required by Section 1 129B of the California Building Code. 'Parking lot and striping modifications may be required to provide additional accessible stalls and to provide proper accessible access in accordance with the ADA requirements. GRADING The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 13. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 14. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16 (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. P:ISTAN\sdp 2002-741 pc coampd Printed July 1, 2002 Page 3 of 7 r 114 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Conditions of Approval - Final Site Development Permit 2002-741 Michael Shovlin (Big 5) Adopted: June.25, 2002 The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions submitted with its application for a grading permit. DRAINAGE 15. "Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology, drainage report and drainage plans for the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner." UTILITIES 16. The applicant shall _comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 17. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape.. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. LANDSCAPING 18. 'The applicant shall comply with Sections 9.90.040 (Table of Development Standards) & 9.100.040 (Landscaping), LQMC. 19.- The plans shall provide for pocket planters around the two end columns at the front of the. building. The planters shall include shrubs and/or vines, and groundcover. 20. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department. When plan checking is complete; the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, if applicable, prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. 21. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. P:\STAN\sdp 2002-741 pc coa.wpd Printed July 1, 2002 Page 4 of 7 r (NN. Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Conditions of Approval - Final Site Development Permit 2002-741 Michael Shovlin (Big 5) Adopted: June 25, 2002 QUALITY ASSURANCE 22. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 23. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such or other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 24. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCAD or raster - image files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 25. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on-site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. 26. The applicant shall maintain the required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate agency. FEES AND DEPOSITS 27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 28. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Art in Public Places program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 29. Any permit(s) issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of said permit(s). P:\STAN\sdp 2002-741 pc coa.wpd Printed July 1, 2002 Page 5 of 7 S, Planning Commission Resolution 2002-069 Conditions of Approval - Final Site Development Permit 2002-741 Michael Shovlin (Big 5) Adopted: June 25, 2002 MISCELLANEOUS 30. Applicant shall comply with the approved Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan 89- 014. 31. Prior to issuance of a building permit, final .working drawings shall be approved by the Community Development Department. The drawings are to include an extension of - the double decorative cornice treatment from the rear of the building to the east side of the building for at least 50% of its length. 32. A minimum clear 24 feet drive aisle shall be provided at the rear of the building. T 33. Big 5 sign square footage not to exceed that approved for "Ross Dress for Less" to the west. Final sign plans based on the plan approved shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for final approval and shall include all details, colors, and materials. MISCELLANEOUS 34. All roof -mounted mechanical equipment must be screened and installed using compatible architectural materials and treatments, in a manner so as not to be visible from surrounding properties and streets. Working drawings showing all such equipment and locations shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department along with construction plan submittal for building permits. Method and design of screening must be approved by the Community Development Department prior to any issuance of building permits related to structures requiring such screening. LIGHTING 35. Rear elevation wall mounted lights for the building shall use non-adjustable shoebox type down shining light fixtures with recessed or flush mounted lenses. FIRE DEPARTMENT 36. Approved super fire hydrants shall be installed not less than 25 feet, nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. Fire Department connection and post indicator valve shall be located at the front of the building. P:\STAN\sdp 2002-741 pc coa.wpd Printed July 1, 2002 Page 6 of7 Planning. Commission Resolution 2002-069 Conditions of Approval - Final Site Development Permit 2002-741 Michael Shovlin.(Big 5) Adopted: June 25, 2002 37. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from the centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 38. Minimum fire flow 1500 GPM for a 2 -hour duration. Fire flow.is based on type, VN construction and a complete fire sprinkler system. 39. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for. plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 40. Water plans for the fire protection system (fire hydrants, FDC, PIV, etc.) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 41. City of La Quinta ordinance requires all commercial buildings 5,000 sq. Ft. or larger to be fully sprinkled, NFPA 13 Standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the Fire Department for plan check. 42. The required water system, including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 43. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. 44. Install a KNOX key box on the building application. Contact the Fire Department for an P:\STAN\sdp 2002-741 pc coa.wpd Printed July 1, 2002 Page 7 of 7 t s: t.^ V 7 kc, L,(11,111+tA — - 06/04/02 TUE 15:09 FAX 7818282784 NESCO LUMARK® -tr'�( p DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONS HRHAMMER 70W-40OW . High Pressure Sadlurn Metal Halide AREA/SITE LIGHT • Spring-loaded, die -east latches provide entry .. withouttool9 • Weather -resistant die-cast aluminum housing finished in bronze polyester powder coat • Hydroformed specular aluminum reflector delivers repeatable Type II, III and Area Cutoff distributions • Die -art, dacron polyester gasket seals out contaminants • Removable die-cast aluminum door with dear flat tempered glass lens • Removable swing -down ballast assembly with quick -disconnect plug. U.L. 1572 Listed for wet locations. CSA Certified • Magul-base porcelain Socket • Appro)dmate net weight: 31-46 lbs. 04-21 k9s.) COOPER LIGHTING (ZAT 5NE•L`'T" Fes- in 012 Superior beam utilization and WALL MNT DRILLIM smooth dlstibution make the —� Hammer Ideal for parking areas, access roadways and other general offstreet area/she Ie W °;1,47MWJ lighting applications. U.L 1572 r••1s•(3atmm)-T listed for wet location and CSA Mm (203mm) I e t2— L(4 . (203n4nJ \ POLE MNT DRIILLLIIN `0 � >� � 'e • � n d• It02m EPA.Erleet•v% Prolactad Arra: 1.69 Sne-(ldmm] MR. holo (3) ORDERING INFORMATION Lj SAMPLE NUMBER: HPHR-113-AOA-MT-C oPNora a Acteeaerim ISee B91oW) Aloorov d DY Date Reso # Ci Piar)ning Commission \ —Q laity Codi evil Cainmuni;y Deo. Dept. InitiaisIA;� Case No. `•ADW 212-02--'ZJ Exhibit OI! O With Conditions For Pole Infotmetlen. Rer.r to MO(Im—Edlaon Srotla•. PRODUCT INFORMATION ff Op'tlona ladd u euflbtl rp.Letup WaRage m Veltage W re HPHR-R116o MT 150 HP6 Rempteale F1-5lrWI9 Fuse 1120, m or 347W 7a70W(Mogul 120V Sodium 0A1027=Phereelecft Control, 690V NEMA Type HPHR-Ise-Z6t?•MT 250 HPS HPHR-113-400-W 400 HPS 100■100w/Mepul 209v MH.Matal HS/HR=Haum alda cutoff 1I3fHRoNendsl shlela 150=150W/Mogul Rdlerd Mouth Ballast (for arm mourn rbetum Hallda MH only) OF LA 1/9Lt2 38Inmmol Sllptr Y Q MrA DA10P1.ObectMount pinto For Square Pole 041042.101Arm far 9quna Pcla, S7 EPAt 0A10MWIrgctMourtplateforRoundPle 176.175WIMagul 2dov MP-PULto IDl SHFETY DEPT 200.200W/Megul 277V Start MH 3W Horizontal Arm 230.=i50WMlogul 3A7V IC1NA)"I 320a,920W(Magul W 400V ML.Pulae 35O='M0W/Mc9QI W MT.M. tl.Tap to Start M14 _ 11100.d0OW/Mogul TTaTripla-Tap fel lunear Reector) T RI oPNora a Acteeaerim ISee B91oW) Aloorov d DY Date Reso # Ci Piar)ning Commission \ —Q laity Codi evil Cainmuni;y Deo. Dept. InitiaisIA;� Case No. `•ADW 212-02--'ZJ Exhibit OI! O With Conditions For Pole Infotmetlen. Rer.r to MO(Im—Edlaon Srotla•. PRODUCT INFORMATION Catalog. Lamp Lamp Number WeIIaOe Type Op'tlona ladd u euflbtl • HPNR FD 70 MT 70 HPS HPHR-KI-100-Mr 100 HPS PET•,-NEMATwlatlodc Photo®enrol �oe••a„ee larder eeperetelYl 04101n�•Phoroel+Mrk Control, ION65V HPHR-R116o MT 150 HP6 Rempteale F1-5lrWI9 Fuse 1120, m or 347W NEMA Typo HPHA-R2-200•MT 200 HPS P2.Doubla Fuaad ROR. 2d0 er480VI 0A1027=Phereelecft Control, 690V NEMA Type HPHR-Ise-Z6t?•MT 250 HPS HPHR-113-400-W 400 HPS o.Quara st"OOy AF.Four-stage or Ilhar OA107a.Fleld4notalled Phetoeentrol MHHR•R3-176-MT 176 MH MHHR413-260-MT HS/HR=Haum alda cutoff 1I3fHRoNendsl shlela Receptacle, NEMA Type (Order Photoalecilrc control aaparatelyl 250 MH MHHR-R2doE, T 400 Rdlerd Mouth Ballast (for arm mourn rbetum 0A1OW-Adjuambti SIIp6aer for 2 3/e• O,D. vertical Tenon MH only) OF LA 1/9Lt2 38Inmmol Sllptr Y Q MrA DA10P1.ObectMount pinto For Square Pole 041042.101Arm far 9quna Pcla, S7 EPAt 0A10MWIrgctMourtplateforRoundPle 1 A 0' Arm for Round POIa, EPA IDl SHFETY DEPT .53 0AiV2_S.lall Mourn Bracket Aat Arm Afor �caNne 2B' O.D. 3W Horizontal Arm 04,021.PhomeleetpeControl, 347VNEMA apP®VE® 'FOR CONSTRUCTION LL-LampIncluded 1.1 DA FE Nons; hl4ebwatt MH MaGroR—TOAltnn,^trw BY w "•Itaa•aand 6011E far I'h'tIrnel mer4et•, Cenruh ra -mot Mampsam oouWaee. 11 Pulse Stent Metal Hailde only. 14 Prodwta alu.., deals in nen.u6 1T0rlOBr2apg77V Mn0 277V, Ido Na Tap 6.Ilmt la 130•n77H47V wlm d 2d7jy. Add d.W wnaq. yfa: MAWoaar•Tlno int; ma'Sn. 0 750 daaOaaW. '"200. ]Te. ]GO e edeW, W 277 any. non a�•arlaale wltn Om EM naelnn. _ a inQ Q Y r a • ■ a • ovoti�.G� lol.l_I�I.I_i_I�l�l_in gl�l� e 2gr _■■■7�'mG�d� � A � C (1 _ • s, �3ssa, m»ys. a" - - � N ■ O 3e a■ a -� mss esso� e 7 c■ a � � o v S =. • w N_ .� sa C $xxeL Cw'a'a: oY s� wC wdC; m�md� mo s g9sdG :�sG o p = Q O q i o 4 r< e 3 6 Yp:Sed: oL"e nre m; p O s ��cm3m • a 33m X ■ e Y^ aq�UgNgaG� • • e • 9 a• ■v a• • +.gpm - 4�1 av■� csa=a 'e 9 � a � 2 3 - a a -In f9 iw :3 e � m°� aton a r_ r =sR . a pgawrCc� s s' 8 A p Y ear r ggaw-p a s Sgg a 2 tg m - �C a ��i is f� glol_�wi..l_�_�-�w�N�.�■ CY" A w � •Yo 0 �J . - ^ g`�C :6Gmoa1S�� M N ' q i� u W J O Y •. w i 1 E Y VI N U M '• - • a ��va�:aa�aaa a ,ss,m`u°.iaeiia'°ao' roy -In f9 iw :3 asap m°� aton a =sR pa • v 8 A p Y ear r a s Sgg a 2 tg m - �C a } 3 a� 1. !4 Hai Hai rn Tn _ c e �„ •- �LO'O fIiNF LERGTN -•' - CLEAR U NA90 NEI ENT !4 Hai Hai rn a II I lfflVIM I'M I � nA II I a z W « ' o t �„ •- �LO'O fIiNF LERGTN -•' - CLEAR U NA90 NEI ENT BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION e1p4-e,e' Sej- ,I oA rE 9�s�ar� e � g; s a>ast�i Y PL�� yy.9 ,3> IL 0 !4 Hai Hai rn a II I lfflVIM I'M I � + II I BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION e1p4-e,e' Sej- ,I oA rE 9�s�ar� e � g; s a>ast�i Y PL�� yy.9 ,3> IL 0 Earth Systems , ,. �� Southwest 79-811B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (760) 315-1533 (800) 921-7015 FAX (760) 345-7315 March 5, 2002 File No.: 0852 1 -01 02-03-712 Desert Cities Development 46-753. Adams Street La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mr. Dave Smoley 'Subject: Soil Engineering Report Update Project: Proposed Big 5, Party World, and Shops One Eleven L;a"Quinta Center La Quinta; California References: 1. Buena :Engineers, Inc., Geotechnical Engineering Report, One Eleven La Quinta Center, La Quinta, California, File No.: B7 -2083-P1, Report No.: 90- 04-724, dated April 5, 1990. 2. Buena .Engineers, Inc., Report of Testing .and Observations During Grading, 111 La Quinta Center, La Quinta, California, File No:: B7 -2083-P3, Report No.: 92=04-737, dated April 13, 1992. 3. Earth Systems Southwest, Soil Engineering Report Update with Supplemental Recommendations, Staples Office Superstore and Ross Dress for Less, One Eleven La Quinta Center, La Quinta, California, File: No.: 08344-01, Report No.: 01-09-776. In. accordance with your request, we have reviewed previously prepared documents associated with the previously completed rough grading; tested the existing pad fill; .and obtained additional samples to be tested for maximum density, pH, resistivity, soluble chloride, and soluble sulfate. The subject lot was originally mass graded as part of the shopping center,development. Site Grading Based upon our review of the soil testing at the subject tract, performed -'through April 14, 1998, it is our opinion that the grading on the subject lots has been performed in general accordance With the project plans and above referenced geotechnical engineering report. The subject building pads, prepared and compacted as of the completion of the overall mass grading that included the removal and:recompaction of the upper 10 feet of soil arid, fihe replacement of this soil as a compacted structural fill. It is our opinion that the subject pads, were graded adequately for the proposed use. However, over three years have passed since the finish grading therefore, some remedial effort is recommended prior to precise grading and building construction. The surface fill soils have dried out since the time of the original grading and compaction has decreased significantly. �� March 5, 2002 -2- File No.: 08521-01 02-03-712 -If J The lots should be initially prepared by removing organic growth from the pad surface. The pad should then be over -excavated to a depth of two feet below the proposed pad grade, scarifled an additional 12 -inches, moisture conditioned and recompacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction. Due to granular nature of the site soils it may be possible to.moisture condition the upper three feet of soil and obtain compaction by using heavy equipment and compacting from the surface. If this method of compaction is used, test holes should be excavated to verify moisture penetration and the effects of the compactive effort. If it is found that either the desired moisture penetration or compaction cannot be achieved by this method, the soils will require over excavation and recompaction. If the current pad elevation is to be altered from its current elevation, fills should be..compacted as recommended in the referenced soil engineering report. If the pad is to be lowered in elevation, the depth of moisture conditioning may need to be increased. Additionally, depending upon the depth of cut (if any), additional over -excavation and compaction may be required. Mitigation of Soil Corrosivity One sample of the upper 12 inches of existing fill soil from each lot was obtained and tested for pH, resistivity, soluble chloride, and soluble sulfate (results attached). This.type of testing serves as an indicator as to the potential adverse effects of reinforcing steel, concrete, and buried pipes. The existing fill soils were found to have moderate to severe sulfate ion concentration (0.08 to 0:3%) and moderate chloride ion concentrations (0.20 to 0.35%). Sul -fate ions can attack the cementitious material in .concrete, causing weakening of the cement matrix and eventual 'P-, deterioration by raveling.. Chloride ions can cause corrosion of reinforcing steel. The Uniform Building Code requires for moderate sulfate conditions that type II Portland Cement be used with a maximum water cement ratio of 0.45 using 4,500 psi concrete mix (UBC Table 19-A-4). A minimum concrete cover of 3 inches should be provided around steel reinforcing or embedded components exposed to native soil or landscape water (to 18 inches above grade). Additionally, the concrete should be thoroughly vibrated during placement. Electrical resistivity testing (70 to 124 ohm -cm) of the soil suggests: that the site soils may present a very severe corrosion potential for metal loss from electrochemical corrosion processes. Corrosion protection of steel can be achieved by using epoxy corrosion inhibitors; asphalt coatings; cathodic protection; or encapsulating with densely consolidated concrete. Earth Systems does not practice corrosion engineering and we recommend that a qualified corrosion engineer evaluate the general corrosion potential with respect to metal construction materials at the site and review the proposed design. The chemical test results are attached. Concrete Slabs -on -Grade Subarade: Concrete slabs -on -grade and flatwork should be supported by compacted soil as .discussed above and in the referenced geotechnical engineering report. Vapor Barrier: In areas of moisture sensitive floor coverings, an appropriate vapor barrier should be installed in order to reduce the potential for moisture transmission from the subgrade soil to the slab. The effectiveness of the moisture barrier is dependent upon the quality of the product, methodology/quality of the overlaps, protection of the barrier during construction, and EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST March 5, 2002 -3- File No.: O8521-01 02-03-712 the successful sealing off of the barrier around utility lines. We recommend that an impermeable membrane (6 -mil plastic) underlie the floor slabs. The membrane should be covered with 2 inches of sand to help protect it during construction and to aide in concrete curing. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the concrete. Low -slump concrete should be used to help minimize shrinkage. Slab thickness and reinforcement: Slab thickness and reinforcement of slab -on -grade are contingent upon the structural engineer or architect's recommendations and the expansion index of the supporting soil. Based upon .our findings,' a modulus of subgrade reaction of approximately 200 pounds per cubic inch can be used in concrete slab design. Concrete slabs and flatwork should be a minimum of 4 inches thick .(actual, not nominal). Concrete floor slabs may either be monolithically placed with the foundations or doweled after footing placement. However, the design engineer/architect should consider the potential adverse effects of temperature changes when providing recommendations for concrete slabs as well as the effects of a free floating slab versus slabs tied to the adjacent footings. The project architect or geotechnical engineer should continually observe all reinforcing: steel in slabs during placement of concrete to check for proper location within the slabs and/or footings. Control Joints: Control joints should be provided in all concrete slabs -on -grade at a maximum spacing of 36 times the slab thickness (12 feet maximum on -center, each way) as recommended by American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines. All joints should .form approximately square Y patterns to reduce randomly oriented contraction cracks. Contraction joints in the slabs should u, be tooled at the time of the pour or saw cut (1/4 of slab depth) within 8 hours of concrete placement. Construction .(cold) joints should either be thickened buttjoints with one=half inch dowels at 24 -inches on center or a thickened keyed-* oint to resist vertical ;deflection at the joint. All construction joints in exterior flatwork should be sealed to prevent moisture or foreign material intrusion. Precautions should be taken to prevent curling of =slabs in this and desert region during the curing process. The contractor should take precautionary measures to ensure proper batching of the concrete, proper placement (without effecting the maximum water/cement ratio), proper finishing, and proper curing. These procedures will reduce the potential for randomly oriented cracks, however, may not eliminate them from occurring. 1 Seismic Design At a minimum, design of onsite structures should conform to the latest editions of the Uniform Building Code, or City/County codes, whichever is most restrictive. It should be noted that building codes are generally intended to protect human safety and prevent structural collapse. They are not necessarily intended to prevent structural damage or preserve functionality after a large earthquake. Therefore, more stringent seismic design should be considered if a particular level of structural performance is desirable after a large earthquake. That design should be based on a site and project specific seismicity analysis. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST March 5, 2002 -4- File No.: 0852 1 -01 02-03-712 s£ The following are updated 1997 UBC seismic design values. Reference Seismic Zone: 4 Figure 16-2 Seismic Zone Factor, Z: 0.4Table 16-I Soil Profile Type: Sp Table 16-S Seismic Source Type: A Table 16-U Closest Distance Known to Seismic Source: 9.1 km= 5.7 miles (San Andreas Fault-Southern) Near Source Factor Na: 1.04 Table 16-5 Near Source Factor, Nv: 1.27 Table 16-T Seismic Coefficient, Ca: 0.46=0.44Na .: Table 16-Q Seismic Coefficient, Cv: 0.81=0.64Nv Table 16-R Except as mentioned above, it is our opinion that the referenced documents are applicable to the proposed development. We make no representation as to the accuracy of the dimensions, measurements, calculations; or any portion of the design. Should you have any questions concerning our addendum report please give, us a call and we will be pleased to assist you. Sincerely, cQWESS/0'v EARTH YSTE S OUTHWEST m W No. 2266 Craig S. Hill Exp. 6-30-04 CE 38234 �s or l F ECHN Pia 9TF OF '' A1.�F�F Letter/csh/dac Distribution 4/Desert Cities Development 1/RC File 2/13D File EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST File No.: 0852 1 -01 March 5, 2002 SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSES Job Name: Big 5; Party World & Shops Job No.: 08521-01 Sample ID: Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Big 5 Party World OH: 7.55 7.55 Resistivity (ohm -cm): 70 124 (saturated) Chloride (0), ppm: 3,451 2,032 Sulfate (SO4), ppm: 2,975 795 Note: Tests performed by Subcontract Laboratory: Soil & Plant Laboratory and Consultants, Inc. 79-607 Country.Club Drive. Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 Tel: (760) 772-7995 General Guidelines-fnr Rnil rnrrncivity Chemical Agent Amount in Soil Degee of Corrosivity Soluble 0 -1000 ppm Low Sulfates 1000 - 2000 ppm Moderate 2000 - 5000 ppm Severe > 5000 ppm Very Severe Resistivity 1-1000 ohm -cm Very Severe 1000-2000 ohm -cm Severe 2000-10,000 ohm -cm Moderate 10,000+ ohm -cm Low EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST a, o� o� of Its To: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager To CDD: From: Jerry Herman, Director of -Community Development Due date:__d_,�_4_1_"' Status: Building Plans Approval (this is NOT an approval to issue a Building Permit) The Community Development -Department has reviewed the Building Plans for the following project: Description:�,/O Ie;7 Address or general location:�6 %/D lI� APN and/or legal description:r�Q 3 IV Applicant Contact: The Community Development Department finds that: ❑ ... these Building Plans do not require Community Development Department approval. these Building Plans are approved by the Community Development Department. ❑ ...these Building Plans require corrections. Please forward a copy of the attached corrections to the applicant. When the corrections are made please return them to the Community Development Department for review. Jerry Herman, Director of tommunity Development Date OCT -27-03 MON 4:49 PM RIV, CO, FIRE P&E INDIO FAX YO. 1 760 863 7072 P. 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department of Forest. y and Dire Protection 2`10 VM San o venue.err a i a ax Tom Tisdale Fire Chlef Proudly serving the Unt000rlweated Areas of Riverside County and the CiMes of- Banning fBanning Beaumont a CW!mcsa Canyon.l.nke Coachella Desert l lot Springs 0 Indian Wells a Indio a Lake Wsir►ore a ' Is Quinta d Moreno Valley Palm Descat b Perris Rancho Mirage 4 San Jacinto Temecula Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 JohnTova8liono, Disbidz Jim Vetyttbttti L)istrid 3 Roy Wilson, Disaict a Marian khtvy, DiWla 5 October 27, 2003 City of La Quinta Building Department Re: Fire and Life Safety Clearance The Riverside County Fire Department is granting occupancy fire and life safety clearance for the following project Big 5 Sporting Goods located at 78-710 hwy 111, La Quinta. FRANK KAWASAKI Chief Fire Department Planner By Terry ucy Fire Systems Inspectors EMERGENCY SERVICES DIVISION . PLANNING SECTION • 1NDIO OFFICE 82.67S HO"Y 111, a FI., LMB, CA 92201 .. (160) 863-8886 . Fax (760) 663.7072 Tom Tisdale • Fire Chief Proudly serving the Unincorporated Areas of Riverside County and the Cities of: Banning 4. Beaumont Calimesa Canyon Lake Coachella Desert Hot Springs 4 - Indian Wells 4 - Indio Lake Elsinore La Quinta .;. Moreno Valley .;. Palm Desert ❖ Perris 4. Rancho Mirage 4. San Jacinto ❖ Temecula Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District I John Tavaglione, District 2 Jim Venable, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Tom Mullen, District 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 21OWest San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California Fax (909) 940-6910 August 30, 2002 To:. City of La Quinta Building Department Re: Release for Building Permits Big 5 Sporting Goods / SDP 2002-741 'The Riverside County Fire Department hereby releases the above referenced project for issuance of a building permit at the discretion of the Building Department. Respectfully, FRANK KAWASAKI T Chief Fire Department Planner By Dale Evenson Fre Safety Specialist EMERGENCY SERVICES DMSION • PLANNING SECTION • INDIO OFFICE 82-675 Highway 111, 2nd Fl., Indio, CA 92201 • (760) 863-8886 • Fax (760) 863-7072 7 1' INUTA -3 1 1 UCL111 r r m^ rvu. 7ei7—J7i3—ts f Jts ' ®Siloam Structural Engineering Consultants STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION REPORT For Big 5 at One Eleven La Quints Center, La Quints, CA 92253 Attendees:. Miles Chang Siloam Structural Engineering Consultants Date: September 2, 2003 Time: 3:00 pm Weather: Sunny 7D No. C043638 nvxxb '� Purpose of Final observation for overall structural construction Report: This site visit was made to observe certain aspects of the Construction Progress. It was aLf intended to be an intense effort to verify strict Contractor compliance, but only a periodic review of progress to see if construction is preceding In general accord with the design intent. Opinions, observations and/or recommendations offered in this report should nor alter the Construction . Contract or any relationships. No assurance or omification as to the quality or completeness of the construction progress is intended, nor should such be construed, since periodic non -continuous observation cannot provide direct knowledge of all conditions as necessary for such a representation. In addition, the observation performed was visually only and included only those portions of the premises were exposed to view. The observation did not include any destructive testing or removal of any equipment, system, or exposed surfaces, This visit also specifically excludes consideration of Construction Means and Methods as well as Worker Safety. Construction Structural construction with 100% completion Phase: Deficiency: Based on our best knowledge and the visual observation performed on above data; the structural construction is in general conformance with the approved structural plan Notc: Structural observation does not waive any ofthe requirements for building inspection by contractor or building department. By: Miles Chang Siloam Structural Engineering Consultants, Inc. Date: September 3, 2003 3333 Brea Canyon Road, Suite 116, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I Tel (909) 598.8218 Fax (909) 598.9758 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 October 29, 2003 Desert Cities Development 46-753 Adams Street La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Dave Smoley �F copy �Qt&trC4V BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT (760)777-7012 FAX (760) 777-7011 RE: Big 5 Sporting Goods, Permit #0204.035 Final Building Inspection Dear Mr. Smoley, In response to your request, this letter is provided as written evidence of the final building inspection performed today at 78-710 Highway 111, Big 5 Sporting Goods department store; noting the following: The building structure was found to be substantially complete in terms of being in compliance with the approved plans and governing Building Codes observed by the City of La.Quinta Building Department. The sales transaction counters and associated electrical approved for construction have not -been constructed. The Certificate of Occupancy for this project will not be issued until the construction of merchandise racks and sales transaction counters are completed and inspected for electrical and accessibility. compliance. Understanding Big 5 will be submitting a permit application and plans for review and approval to construct merchandise racks and sales transaction counters, Permif #0204- 035 will remain un-finaled for occupancy`compliance. Respectfully, 1 ;amel P.rawfor Jr. Building Inspector II dpc DCD Development, Inc., dba DESERT CITIES DEVELOPMENT 46-753 Adams Street, La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 771-3345 FAX.- (760) 771-4431 . MEMORANDUM ` DATE: October 28, 2003 TO: BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT City of La Quinta ATT: Daniel Crawford FROM: Dave Smoley RE: BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS / La Quinta MESSAGE: We understand that a Certificate of Occupancy for this project will not be issued until BIG 5 installs its merchandise racks, gondolas, sales counters, etc., in the Sales Aiea so that these can be inspected for ADA compliance. We anticipate the building will pass final inspection on Wednesday, October 29, with the exception of the above -noted fixtures, which will be noted as a correction on the card. Desert Cities Development is bound by the Lease agreement between BIG 5 and the Center Owner to deliver the building to BIG 5 on October 31 (this Friday). This means that the building is substantially complete in terms of being in compliance with the approved plans and governing codes, and that it has passed final inspection for the building itself, excluding fixtures to be installed by BIG 5, and that BIG 5 may take possession on that date. If your final inspection on Wednesday supports the above statement, the Owner — ONE ELEVENLA QUINTA, LLC, -- requests a letter from you and/or the Building Department confirming that italicized statement. This will satisfy the terms of the Lease for both the Owner and BIG 5. BIG 5 will thereafter complete its fixture installation, call for inspection of that final correction and request the Certificate of Occupancy. Thanks for your assistance in this matter. One Eleven La Quinta, LLC MICHAEL J. SHOVLIN 71-084 Tamarisk Lane Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 TEL_ (760) 324-5485 FAX: (760) 321-2831 Post -it® Fax Note 7671 DateZ �� 03 pages To�NEU�� L/1�U,jLCC From fD Co./Dept. _ Co. ��'7 OF u} tpWNl Phone # �Z / Phone # Fax #3 ZI ` Z$ 3 Fax # _. 9 February 19, 2003 CITY OF LA QUINTA Building and Safety Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quints, CA 92253 SUBJ: Permit # 0204-035 _ Job address: —1U8J71-01H'igf way 111 We hereby request an extension of this permit due to unforeseen circumstances surrounding the lease agreement with the proposed tenant, Big 5 Sporting Goods. Thank you. Michael J. Shovlin Managing Member c: Jerry Herman, Director Community Development Dept CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT. APPROVED 0 1w ISO-VAJ E?Cp sSv L4 iA fQeC40 +?Geµ E�c,Q�2ms �,l�ss cwJstiwe��J . tt cozako NGT waiev-- - vrAn 51251 3 T { Certificate of Occupancy0�z .ottucv IramwouTm� z Building & Safety Department 5 t This Certificate is issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 109 of the California Building M� Code, certifying that, at the time of issuance, this structure was in compliance with the =' provisions of the Building Code and the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction and/or use. ` us 4 BUILDING ADDRESS: 78-710 Highway 111 Use classification: Commercial Retail, Birt 5 Sporting Goods Building Permit No.: 0204-035 i }` _ Occupancy Group: M Type of Construction: VN Sprinkled Land Use Zone: CR : " i d { Owner of Building: One -Eleven La Quinta, LLC Address: 71-084 Tamarisk t City, ST, ZIP: Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 ter. By: Daniel P. Crawford Jr. f £ Date: 11/21/03 i r Building Official i POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE �i