The URL can be used to link to this page

13636 (CSCS)4 P.O. BOX 1504 Building 78-988 Hwy 111 78-105 CALLE ESTADO Address LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Owner Peter Sturgoon Mailing Address 68-815 Ramon Road City , zip Cathedral City, CA 922341 Contractor T.R. Noye Construction A 'Id Z Is. 94 Lennon, suite'C-i No. BUILDING: TYPE CONST.--..; VN OCC� GRP. A D 643-080-05 Tel. ( ILegal Descripti City Zip Tel: Palm Desert, IM 92260�-" (619)341-7942 State Lic. 4;.— City " - &CIassif. B 516770 Lic. # Arch., Engr., Designer dary -Warren Knutbon, Architect Address P.O. BOX 1400 Sq. Ft. Size New 0 Description Pad H-2 Luba Shop 3740 No. - Stories 13636 B -11B-2 No. DIN. Units Add 0 -Alter 0 Repair 0 Demolition 0 '11*61911328-41071 Permit includes trash enclosure. City Zip State Decorative block'tork A-44-1 fV1A 0111411; 4 t- _,7 A r m ZONE: obtained sepai LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION 1,hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing wit� Section ,\7 )tof Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and SIGNATURE DATE —Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION - I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the foll1i n 9 q, reason:. (Sec. 7031.5,Business and Professions Code,! -Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, after, improve, demolish, or repairalny structure, prior to its issuance also ..Is requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he, is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9'(commencing with . Section 7000) - of Ilk Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that -he is -exempt therefrom,, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7631.5 by"'any applicant' for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars`($500)�' 0 1, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as th;ir s6le compensation, will ,do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, BuIsness and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to,an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself of through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or. offered for sale. If, how�ver, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion; the owner -builder wilt'have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.) 0 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to con- struct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law —Side Street Setback from Center.Line Estimated Valuation - -*--, PERMIT *N,Pi�A Chk. Dep. Olan*Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical Plumbing S. M. 1. does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law.) 0 1 am exempt under Sec.-B.I& P.C. for this reason Grading Driveway Enc. A Date�__Owner Infrastructure Arts in PuM WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLAR;�ION I h6reby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a cj�tificate of ,Worker's Compensation Insurance, ora certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800,'Labor Code.) Policy No Company - ' ..I __T - 0 Certified copy is hereby furnished. TOTAL CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM "'i WORKERS'COMPENSATION INSURANCE REMARKS (This section need not be completed if the permit is for, one huna�red dollars ($100) valuation or less.) I certify that in the performance of thp work for Which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subiect to the Work ' I Laws of California. a s 0 pensa on NOTICE TO APPLICANf- If,' after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of�the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec.'3097, Civil Code.) Lender's Nam Lender's Addres This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration it work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. I car tify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives -of *this city to enter the above- mentioned property for inspection purposes. Signature of applicant -Date- Mailing Addres City, State, Zip its to be ,$161,193;,00 AMOUNT 600.00 856.50 53.50 225.50 1.63.50 33,85-46,12- 20.00 00 0 0 a Palces. 9TJ . -Z , Z ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center I —Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line —Side Street Setback from Center.Line Si de Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Q 77� ff Issued by: —Date e iti 7994 Validated by: Validation: CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE NO. ELECTRICAL FEES NO. PLUMBING FEES 1ST.FL. SQ. FT. @ $ UNITS SLAB GRADE 2ND FL. SO. FT. @ YARD SPKLR SYSTEM POR. SO. FT. @ MOBILEHOME SVC. BAR SINK GAR. SO. FT. @ POWER OUTLET ROOF DRAINS #kFOUND. REINF./,2-,C GAS(ROUGH) METER LOOP DRAINAGE PIPING CAR P. SO. FT. @ OTHER APPJEOUIP. I WALL SO. FT. @ DRINKING FOUNTAIN SO. FT. @ GROUT URINAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION $ INS WATER PIPING NOTE: Not to be used as property tax valuation WATER SYSTEM FLOOR DRAIN MECHANICAL FEES LUMBER GR. WATER SOFTENER VENT SYSTEM FAN EVAP.CCOL HOOD SIGN WASH ER(AUTO)(DISH) APPLIANCE DRYER GARBAGE DISPOSAL FURNACE UNIT WALL FLOOR SUSPENDED VENTILATION LAUNDRYTRAY AIR HANDLING UNIT CFM IKITCHEN SINK ABSORPTION SYSTEM B.T.U. TEMP USE PERMIT SVC WATERCLOSET' COMPRESSOR HP POLE, TEMIPERM LAVATORY HEATING SYSTEM FORCED GRAVITY AMPERES SERV ENT SHOWER BOILER B.T.U. SO. FT. @ c BATH TUB SO. FT. @ c I WATER HEATER MAX. HEATER OUTPUT, B.T.U. SO. FT. RESID @ 11/4 c SEWAGE DISPOSAL CERT. OCC. SO.FT.GAR @ 3/4c HOUSE SEWER INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURESIINITIALS GAS PIPING PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE DBL I TOTAL FEES MICRO FEE MECH.FEE PL.CK.FEE I CONST FEE ELECT.FEE SMIFEE PLUMB. FEE STRUCTURE PLUMBING ELECTRICAL HEATING & AIR COND. SOLAR SETBACK ROUND PLUMBING UNDERGROUND A.C. UNIT COLL. AREA SLAB GRADE ROUGH PLUMB. BONDING HEATING (ROUGH) STORAGE TANK FORMS (Oe//�EWER OR SEPTIC T o�� ROUGH WIRING 6 DUCT WORK ROCK STORAGE #kFOUND. REINF./,2-,C GAS(ROUGH) METER LOOP HEATING (FINAL) OTHER APPJEOUIP. REINF. STEEL GAS (FINAL) TEMP.POLE GROUT WATER HEATER SERVICE /01NAL INS BONDBEAM WATER SYSTEM $ GRADING —CU. yd. —Plus—x$—=$ LUMBER GR. &NAL I NSP. FRAMING r'22 - Fl AL INSP �*OOFING c"j k'l 45� PC) C—'� f"w Lo" uL, 1-;26 REMARKS: VENTILATION FIRE ZONE ROOFING FIREPLACE SPARK ARRESTOR GAR. FIREWALL LATHING MESH INSULATION/SOUND FINISH GRADING If FINAL INSPECTIONJ� CERT. OCC. FENCE FINAL INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURESIINITIALS GARDEN WALL FINAL 47 WOW. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH I PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICANT: Su&it this form with four copies of a SCALED plot plan 11� SCALE) drawn to County specifications as indicated on the attached check list. A non-refundable filing fee is required when the application Is submitterlACheick must be made payable to the County of Riverside. Approval of this*applica- tion shall remain valid for a period not to exceed one year from date of pay'Iment. LOG# e/n, d r �A A ent, Contractor, Contact Person x 4-tep- Sivo Address city State Zip 68 -Pt!� �Olrxll CITY CA qzZS� Telephone 619 31,9 CqYd Owner Address city State Zip I 1 1, ( f Tel phone 1/;I < _ �(2 QuAd 61 (r). 1, P V" 3190Y9 Z 0 Job Property Address CA' IFzz.457S city Zip 0 LU U) Lot Size 6:6&" 4, 4 - 0Aa 414 j1A11,Cy4: ,,Use of Permit, PIP, SUP, PUP, etc. bd� 2,46,0' q,./,6.04fZ 1,JAJ4 Legal Description nr 7 Aw? o -c- NA p S,f rf-,2.- p-etc. Signa I Applicant—- - Date A CHECK I -OX IF REO ED' UA El Holding Tank Ag"ents Completed El Detailed ContourPlot Plans Required (1 to 5 foot interval) Certification of Existing S;D. System Required Q Grading Handout Provided WQCB Clearance Required Staff Specialist Lot Inspection Required z 0 (Attach For DOH -SAN -007, Santa Ana Region Only, U Lot Inspection L3 Soils Percolation Report Required Uj L) Date Lot Inspection Completed: Initials Special Feasibility, Boring Report Required MArF_;-0y COr-4,14,I)Q! Remarks: 7-& 44,� maintenance Booklet Provided Initials WR -XP Date (L 16 - 7-29- 7 L) Final ln�piction by Department of Environmental Health is required. C/42 I Soil; Percolation Boring Report by Uc4project # Date Soils Map Page oil Ty Approved Date ot'-systems Type of System(s) NLILelling Units (1) S6512112111* Sq �ate Grease/Sand B %F (3 Hollr-f��i7ankl___13 Replacement i6ture Units SAA10 7RAP Grease Intzip/LintoTrap, 0 Now 'V - 7_QGaI. U Existing / - /_6 0 daw. 'CLC41LF*Q W/-CVW,0.M-� 7 LF-40CF6 Sidewall Allowance -sq. Bo Area Leach Bed ft. of ft. sq ft. running ft. Install..., long wide with Inlet Tested Depth NA i�� drainlines or �b.low Proposed Bottom Tested Depth _1*%. Z 0 Leach 11nes/bed special design for slopa� Applicable (3, Pit Diameter No. Pits Pit Below Inlet (BI) Seepage Pit To Maximum Allowable �Qepth Other: N/A_Overburden F' o 5� T67. Well Review Approved: Date: Well Drilling Permit# SIGNATURE Grading'�Plan Approved: Date: 1, SIGNATURE 04 (4,rl z 4 VA ( L Sr V 154 D/�ti/cr Sewer Verificabo.n Apqroved: 9-/- 9Y .4J.Dat.: 4- 1,/ A-64 REMARKS: _j4.1AAf& a"011 01 epaw�xe This application 14 PPR6VED ENWEI-for$M&-categorrdtft*ed4mSECTt@WB FOR OFFICE USE ONLY above, regarding th.4.RsIni.if.0iubS��1iJ1SP0Sa1 system as Indicated -on the- . ; acompanled plot plan, using the requiremen ts set forth In SECTION C above. A build- Ing Is for the Installation '7 YT' 97,00 permit necessary of the above -designed system. No*construc- -3 Revenue code ee$ tionil37per.mifted4n4ho"v=Weclreser4od�,100,04,exoonsiontama. (1) Septic Tank must be 1W minimum from any wells. Check # (2) Leach lines must be 100' minimum from any wells, including expansion area. Date qY itim -7- /o Sewer lines must be 59 minimum from any wells. e116(1 z 2 (4) Seepage pits must be 15 0' minimum from any wells, Including expansion area. LU M C1 ;-Z TN C-3 Signature of Health Official Date SO 0 UUM-bAN I 6Z (KOV Ult - III Limmoution: wrii I t—irrice r-ne; YtLLUW—APPIicam; VINK—tfl0g. U.OPII.; UVI-QLINIROL—Plans/Records DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 82-879 Highway 111 NOTICE: Indio, CA 92201 Document Cannot Be Duplicated 619-775-3500 Date 8/8/94 Type of Permit I La Quinta No. 12998 1 Permit #1 Owner Name TheLa'QuintaOilCo. Log N o. 78-988 Street Hwy Ill city La Quinta Zip 92253 Study Area F2_32� APN # 1643-080-005 1 Tract # I Lot # Square Footage 13740 Type of Development Tornmercial No. of units Comments Lube Sho12 w/ trash enclosure At the present time, the Desert Sands Unified School District does not collect fees on garages /carports, covered patios /walkways, residential additions under 500 square feet, detached accessory structures or replacement mobilehomes. It has been determined the above-named owner is exempt from paying school fees at this time due to the following reason: EXEMPTION NOT APPLICABLE This certifies that school facility fees imposed pursuant to Government Code 53080 in the amount of X or $ 1,009.80 have been paid to D.S.U.S.D. for the property listed above and that building permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy for this square footage in this proposed project may now be issued. Fees Paid By. The Lube Shop, Inc. Telephone 328-0480 Name on the check By Dolores A. Ballesteros Superintendent d /exempted b Fee collecte y Peggy Reyes Payment Received Signature k�MIA 6�4ez2 U U I Check- No. 554611!_ J -1 �' 1� � _W " Collector: Attach a copy of county or city plan check application form to district copy for all'.waivers. Embossed Original- Build ing Dept./ Applicant Copy - Applicant/ Receipt Copy - Accoundn/j-'� Q9IJ(rC4V Developers Project Approvals Form 1. '1;.. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit for Lu F u- ;�vp' A-7- -71 - W 8 the following Departmental clearances- must be obtained. Please return completed form to the Building and Safety Department at your earliest convenience to expedite the permit process. JD LA DO" Name/Title Building and Safety De 4&k 4 Name/Title Health Department Fire Department Department Date Date (5>- /6 - Date Date/ Date AUG 10 1�94 PLAN 'I —' — %dulivi,& M NG DEPA RT g T I MEN 'I', 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FM DEPARTMENT 210 WEST W IACI AVENUE 4 PIMS, CAUPORNIA (714) 07-3183 knx awls COUNTY FIRS 0141EY Da to I Tat 94-L Plamning Departmomt Surveyor's Oftice Th* Riyaroide Cowmty Fire Department horwby release* the peoject 116'twd belawl Log Nuinber i Aidd reon i 4e-4 ft�wvw�vft CHE.CK ONE$ Final Racoroat�an Further Development Meter Set Cnly shell Final Tomamt Improyomont Final Final for accwpancy -------------------- CHECK ONRa : Pat* poto Fees Not Paid Foot Not Raqwirod 11 you should hey& any qwwations rn;l&rd4n;l this matter, piva&* do mat hesitate to contmat the Firo Department Planning Section staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Departmont Planner REL92,10/92 FIRZ PRZVIWTIGN DIVIStop PLAHNING SUCTION Q Rlyv=1 0mce 3760 1 11h Sctw, jt1vwjW% C -A fl 9 1 (714) IIIA771 9 fAX (7141 W-7411 r *<M;o MCA 10,733 C&wu" C1.6 DA�% $Ulu F, 4w* CA 91:01 (410) 34LM a PAX (olf) 11�1012 colfewlerw04 GARY WARREN KNUTSON, ARCHITECT 11.0. BOX 1400 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92235-1400 May 9,1995 CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING DEPARTMENT Mr. Mark Harold' Building Inspedtor P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA, 92253* RE: THE.LUBE SHOP AT LA QUINTA. NOTICE OFSUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. Dear Mark, This letter. is to notify the Building Department that The Lube Shop at La QuInta, has been substantially completed'. This letter applies to the contract documents prepared by the Architect of record. During the courseof construction; and in accordance with the Owner - Architect Agreement, ALA Document B 15 1, structural observations were made on this project. Structural components have been substantially completed in accordance with the drawing. cspectr@rJy,-''6 GARY WARREN KNUTSON, ARCHITECT P.O. BOX 1400 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA, 92235-1400 3 AUG 94 THE MY OF LA QUINTA 78495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 TO W HOM IS MAY CONCERN: This letter is to confirm that as the architect of record I will provide structural observation of the construction of "The Lube Shop at La Quinta" in accordance with the 1991 Uniform Building Code, Section 307. Respectfully su - - . G 'a"r r V -j ary W��6 Knutson, Ar itect 7 JULY 94 GARY WARREN KNUTSON, ARCHITECT P.O. BOX 1400 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92235-1400 RE: SUBMITTAL SPANCRETE OF CALIFORNIA PRODUCT ACCEPTANCE CITY OF LA QUINTA (AS REQUIRED BY "CALWEST ENGINEERING' PLAN CHECK) . As the Architect of record of the Lube Shop at La Quinta, I acknowledge thail have reviewed the Submittals of the Product and Structural Calculation by "Spancrete of California" and therewith approve the use of the product as being in general conformance with the architect's drawings. I N It C2 1972 Council of American Building Officials SECRETARIAT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE BUILDING OFFICIALS AND CODE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ADMINISTRATORS INTERNATIONAL. INC. 5360 South Workman Mill Road 900 Montclair Road 4051 West Flossmoor Road Whittier. California 90601 Birmingham, Alabama 35213 Country Club Hills, Illinois W478 NATIONAL EVALUATION SERVICE COMMITTEE - REPORT NO. NER-294 Reissued October 1, 1990 This report is subject to re-examination in 2 years. FIBERMESH COMPANY 4019 INDUSTRY DRIVE CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37�16 1. SUBJECT Fibermesh— Fibers III. PROPERTIES FOR WHICH EVALUATION IS SOUGHT 1. Concrete fiber admixture for controlling plastic cracking in concrete. 2- Concrete fiber reinforcement for'controlling shrinkage and thermal cracking in nonstructural concrete (plain concrete) slabs on grade. III. DESCRIPTION Fibcrmesh Fibers are collated fibrillated polypropylene o1cfin fibers 1/2, 3/4, 1-1/2, and 2 inches in length that are furnished in small bundles that disperse during mixing when added to a concrete mix. Fibermesh Fibers may be used in normal -weight and light -weight concrete. Fibermesh Fibers may be used as a concrete fiber admixture in concrete to assist in inhibiting plastic cracking. Fibermesh Fibers may be used in nonstructural concrete (plain concrete) slabs on grade to control shrinkage and thermal cracking intardened concrete. Plain concrete is defined in ACI 318.1 and Chapter 26 of the Uniform Building Code. IV. INSTALLATION Fibermesh Fibers shall be blended into the concrete mix according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fibermesh Fibers shall be added to the concrete mix at a minimum rate of 1.5 pounds (0. 1% by volume) per cubic yard of concrete. V. IDENTIFICATION Each container of Fibermesh Fibers shall bear the manufacturer's name and/or trademark, address and this NER report number for field identification. VI. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED 1. Manufacturer's descriptive literature, FM 1324, Rev. May 11, 1998. 2. Test report on Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, Tensile Strength, Modulus of Elasticity, Evaporation and Water Migration, prepared by Paul Kraai, P. E., dated August 29, 1983. 3. Test report on Lightweight Concrete with Fibermesh, Compressive, Flexural, and Splitting Tensile Strength Tests prepared by Paul P. Kraai, P. E., dated October 2, 1984 * 4. A preliminary investigation of four 36" x 36" x 6" thick concrete slabs consisting of either normal -weight or lightweight concrete with or without fibermesb fibers in small-scale fire tests, prepared by Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Test Report R 11 194/84NK20956, dated April 9, 1985, signed by Joseph M. Katz and Kenneth D. Rhodes. 5. Test report, of Fibermesh in floor -ceiling assemblies under ASTM E 119, Steel Deck Construction with Normal and Lightweight Concrete, prepared by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Test Report File R8534-1 1, Project 86NK1638 and Project 86NK14858, dated July 28, 1987, signed by Joseph M. KaLz and Kenneth D. Rhodes. 6. Test report on Static Load Tests of Three 10' x 10' x 6" Concrete Slabs for Fibermesh, Inc., prepared by Wiss, Janney & Elstner Associates, Inc., WJE No. 855030, dated July 10, 1985, signed by Bernard Erlin and Donald W. Pfeifer. REPORT NO. NER-294 PAGE I OF 2 This report is limited to the specific product and data and test reporti submitted by the applicant in its application requesting this report. No independent tests were performed by the National Evaluation Service Committee, and the committee specifically does not make any warranty, either expressed or implied, as to any finding or other matter in this report or as to any product covered by this report. This disclaimer includes, but is not limited to, merchantability. This report is also subject to the limitation listed herein. 19� REPORT NO. NER-294 7. Test report on Compressive Strength under ASTM C 39, Splitting Tensile Strength under ASTM C 496, Flexural Strength under ASTM C 78 and Uniform Load under ASTM E 72, prepared by Smith Emery Company, File No. 14613, Laboratory No. L-86-2292, dated November 5, 1986, signed by Timothy D. Holton. 8. Test report an Compressive Strength ASTM C 39, Static Flexure Test under ASTM C 1018 with an evaluation of toughness indexes, Impact Test under ASTM D 1557 and Flexural Fatigue Test, prepared by South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Dr. V. Ramakrishnan and Mulpuri Nagabhushana, dated January 13, 1989. 9. Test report under ASTM C39 Compressive Strength and ASTM C496 Splitting Tensile Strength after 7 days, 28 days and I year, demonstrating long term durability of fibers, prepared by Smith Emery Company, File No. 14613, Lab No.. L-86-2292 Addendum, dated September 21, 1987, signed by Timothy D. Holton, C.E. No. 39613. 10. Test report under ASTM C 666, prepared by H.H. Holmes Testing Laboratories, Inc., Lab No. CH 9837, File No. 6698.0, dated June 29, 1984, signed by Robert L. Nelson and James A- Kolakowski. PAGE 2 OF 2 VII. CONDMONS OF USE The National Evaluation Service Committee finds that Fibermesh Fibers as described in � this report, comply with the requirements in the 1990 BOCA National Building Code, the 1988 Standard Building Code with 1089/1990 Revisions, and the 1998 Uniform Building Code with the 1989 Supplement, subject to the following conditions: 1. Fibermesh Fibers shall not be used as a replacement for any reinforcement required for structural purposes by the Model Codes. 2. The structural design of the concrete shall meet the requirements of the Model Codes. 3. The fibers shall be blended into the concrete mix according to the manufacturer's instructions. This report is su�ject to re-examination in two yeam PROVED to Increase Concrete Abrasion Resistance A test program designed to evaluate relative abrasion resis- tance was developed to measure the effect of Fibermesh fibers in concrete when exposed to ex- cessive wear. The Army Corps of Engineers' "Method of Test for Resistance of Concrete or Mortar Surfaces to Abrasion" (Rotating Cutter Method CRD -052-54) was used. CONCLUSION: "Based on the data derived from the rotating -cutter method of testing, the use of Fibermesh will -increase the abrasion resistance by 105%. This added toughness with the use of Fibermesh will double the serviceable life of con- crete exposed to similar wear conditions. " Paul P. Kraai, P.E. State.of California Tests were also run in cooper- ation with the Norwegian High- ways Laboratories. Tests were conducted on Norcem Cement's studded tire, abrasion test machine. At 42 MPH utilizing steel studded tires and 10 ton axle loads the equipment can accurate- ly demonstrate the effects of 10 years of highway wear at the rate of 15,000 vehicles per day. CONCLUSION: The Fibermesh C-75 specimen exhibited a 52% increase in abra- sion resistance by sustaining 34.4% less material loss than the control specimen without fibers. Significantly, the C-50 Fibermesh specimen, containing less cement, still exhibited a 20% increase in abrasion resistance over the C-75 control specimen by sustaining 17.2% less material loss. The C-50 concrete has a base design strength of 7,252 psi while the C-75 concrete has a design strength equivalent to 10,878 psi. Photo and graph courtesy Norcem Cement AIS. PROVED in Static Load Test as Alternate to Welded Wire Fabric A comprehensive study was conducted in the laboratories of Wiss, Janney, Elstner & Associates, Inc., Consulting & Research Engineers by registered Professional Engineers. Results apply only to Fibermesh. PURPOSE OF THE TEST This test program compared on a large scale the flexural capacity and deflections of concrete slabs containing the recommended quantity of Fibermesh polypropylene fibers to a plain concrete slab and a concrete slab -�Photo courtesy'Wiss, Janney, Elstner & Assoc. containing a typical amount of welded wire fabric (WWF) for dry- ing shrinkage crack control pur- poses. All three slabs were cast from one batch of concrete. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study reported herein indicate that substituting welded wire fabric with Fibermesh at a rate of 1.5 lbs. per cubic yard (0.9 kilograms1cubic meter) of concrete yields: — Equivalent flexural strength capacity of the slab. — Equivalent load -deflection relationship. The flexural capacity of the slab containing Fibermesh was 2% higher than the slab containing welded wire fabric and 8% higher than the plain concrete slab. The load -deflection data indicate that, with respect to flexural response characteristics, Fibermesh fiber s can be used as a practical alternative to welded wire fabric which is commonly used for - shrinkage crack control purposes in essentially unreinforced concrete. Direct excerpts from the Wiss, Janney, Elstner & Associates report. 17.000 16.000 15.000 14,000 13.000 12,000 a 9,000 8.000 7.000 6.000 5.000 4.000 3.000 2.000 1.000 Averep Not Danact=s at G9688 8 and 7 (x0.001 2m) F0r0&V0ZSJ948flsC= MU -M for the 3 slab& PROVED to Increase Shatter Resistance of Concrete A test program evaluated the shatter resistance of Fibermesh concrete and plain concrete when exposed to crushing loads. The specimens were 21 " x 61' x 6" giving a height/thickness (HIT) ratio of 31/2 to 1 in order to simulate a column in a high rise building. All columns were tested in a standard compression strength machine. The rate of compression was .025ff per minute and was automatically documented on an X -Y recorder. Fibermesh specimen is free-standing after 2.Off compression CONCLUSION: Results show the ability of Fibermesh concrete to sustain itself and not shatter after more than 10% compression as com- pared to plain concrete which shattered completely shortly after first crack. This characteristic of Fibermesh concrete is important to applications where there are impact or seismic concerns for safety to life and property. Plain concrete fails at 0.32" compression PROVED to Increase Impact Resistance . A sophisticated study of the impact resistance of concrete containing Fibermesh was con- ducted at the University of British Columbia, utilizing an instru- mented impact machine developed by Dr. Sidney Mindess. The results indicate the foot pounds of energy to fracture - beams with and without rebar. IMPACT FRACTURE ENERGY FIBERMESH FRC BEAMS WITHOUT REBAR 40 930 (a a 20 Z 0 0 10 - to 0.0 -0h 0.3 0.5 FIBER CONTENT % VOLUME IMPACT FRACTURE ENERGY FIBERMESH FRC BEAMS WITH REBAR 15 0 9600- 500 - c400 - Z = 300- 09L 2 ti 10 FL 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 FIBER CONTENT% VOLUME CONCLUSION: The addition of Fibermesh fibers shows remarkable increases in energy absorption/impact of both plain and steel reinforced concrete. The Fibermesh fibers act in two Research engineer removes Fibermesh specimen after test ended. Column was compressed 10% and still remained intact. "During the fracture, fibers are exposed. The surface of the fibers are ploughed lengthwise during pull-out which indicates a good bond between fibers and cement paste." G.M. Idom Consult AIS Consulting and Research Engineers Denmark ways. They "bridge' the cracks that develop, thereby inhibiting further crack growth and enhance the bond between the concrete and the reinforcing bars by inhibiting cracking of the concrete under bearing stresses in the vicinity of the bar deformations. "It is worth emphasizing the point that there appears to be a synergistic effect when fibers are combined with conventional reinforcement, together, they are much more effective than when the effects of each are con- sidered separately." Sidney Mindess, Amon Bentur, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada -k Earth Systems Consultants IN. F Southern California August 3, 1994 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Project: Proposed Lube Shop One Eleven La Quinta Center La Quinta, California Buena Engineers Division 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (619) 345-1588 (619) 328-9131 FAX (619) 34.5-7315 B7 -2083-P2 94-08-708 Ref: Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Buena Engineers, Inc. dated April 5, 1990; Report No. 90-04-724 This letter is concerning the plan check comments related to the Lube Shop proposed for. the One Eleven La Quinta Center Development. The first comment concems the use of ."Fibermesh" fiber reinforcement in the concrete building slabs on grade. As discussed in the referenced report, the site soils consist primarily of silty sands that fall within the "very low" expansion category. in accordance with 1991 UBC Table No. 29-C. Based upon 199-1 UBC Section 2904, no reinforcement is required for slabs placed on soils in the "very low" expansion category. However. in the referenced report we did suggest wire mesh reinforcement to limit the potential for non- structural related shrinkage cracking. As discussed in ICBO Report No. 4811, the proper use of "Fibermesh" fibers, can be effective in the control of shrinkage related cracking. Based upon this, it is, our opinion that the use of "Fibermesh" fiber reinforcement along with properly spaced control joints in lieu of standard wire mesh reinforcement should be acceptable for slabs on grade on th-is project. The second plan check comment concerns the lateral pressure used* in the design of the basement walls. The lateral pressure provided in the referenced report (35 pcf EFP) is applicable to "active" conditions. Because the basement walls will be restrained, the "at rest" pressure would, be more appropriate for use in design. We recommend an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf for estimating lateral' pressures with the "restrained" conditions. If there are any questions concerning this letter or the referenced report, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Earth S y s t e m s C n n s u I t a n t s I Copies: 2 - City of La Quinta 2 - Gary Warren Knutsen I - VTA File REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT VWI iONTANDY 3580 Condalia Ave. Yucca Valley, CA 92284 (619) 365-5045 TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED INFORCED CONCRETE 0 STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY 0 POST TENSIONED CONCRETE 0 ASPHALT 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIRE PROOFING 0 0 OTHER JOB '71N A4 -o\4 ikk t v -,-L-A , CA REPORT SEQUENCE NO. TNX STRUCTURE �A VA : L' U (--3 e- PERMIT NO. D TE �§ -'� R- qr DAY OF WEEK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT INSPECTOR ��( t48V HRS.CHARGED I ENGINEER ASSISTANTS I HRS.CHARGED INSPECTION DATE GENERAL SUB CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR -S-(-b -�-JR-9.9 QjgrE-CILAi�� &6Ce-me,,T 0-�- pj- 19OR 3p 00 f (P CotAS-Moc—it--Ci p0g, SeX p-( -3g� Cgtj CR-e-'ke- Le K -es U L Ts 0--� C OPY SENT TO CLIENT (11 CCO*N*\INUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE OF CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. SIGNATURE 01`�_tEG T RED INSPECTOR q re' 3 --19 - 0 �C— DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER JONTANDY 3580 Condalia Ave. Yucca Valley, CA 92284 "SPECIAL INSPECTION SER ICE� (619) 365-5045 REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT TYPE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY 0 INSPECTION POST TENSIONED CONCRETE 0 ASPHALT 0 OTHER PERFORMED 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIRE PROOFING J�LVTIO�q REPORT SEQUENCE NO. - 99 LA Qj -,.,,TA TY,PE OF STRUCTURE PERMIT NO. -DAY OF WEEK (—L)6z -�k400 136 03 S- V MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT I HRS.CHARGED y ENGINEER ASSISTANTS HRS.CHARGED INSPECTION GENERAL SUB DATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR 5 pf-T- L L,7k— (--c C�j (k ,,, Ae-rs eiz te w\. e- A o t\1 e- e -a- 9 C u pr- oo -ra s L,; t Tte\ dees U -c- -(�s f e7 11 COPY SENT TO CLIENT 0 MINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE OF CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY SIGNATURE OF REGIS*JED INSPECTOR KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED 'Te"I.0 C - PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE (?- q - F - GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. DATE OF REPORT REGISTER NUMBER &-j i REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT JONTANDY 3580 Condalia Ave. Yucca Valley, CA 92284 (619) 365-5045 TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED >!QEINFORCED CONCRETE 0 STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY 0 POST TENSIONED CONCRETE 0 ASPHALT 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 FIRE PROOFING 0 0 OTHER JOBICPIN C, gg 6�N i L A kA-%-6N- REPORT SEQUENCE NO. OF STRUCTURE T6mw\ 1, U 6'e- 1, :� f-�o 00 PERMIT NO. 1-3 fo 13 DT. p- 1-� DAY OF WEEK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT INSPECTOR HRS.CHARGEO ENGINEER ASSISTANTS 7 HRS.CHARGED INSPECTION DATE GENERAL CONTRACTOR -Te, 0\1 SUB CONTRACTOR -s v o jp R -e -s u -L,—,5 o4 3 Y2--( Co t4i S -(-e u c T -00 COPY SENT TO CLIENT CJ CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 7PAGE OF ERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT JONTANDY 3580 Condalia Ave. Yucca Valley, CA 92284 (619) 365-5045 TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED EINFORCED CONCRETE 0 POST TENSIONED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY 0 ASPHALT 0 FIRE PROOFING 0 0 OTHER JOB LOCATION REPORT SEQUENCE NO. TYPWF STRUCTURE M!q 19A -4I PERMIT NO. 13 6 a3 DATE DAY OF WEEK 12__ / (I-qj- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT �Kpu-r-s-ofi INSPECTOR ' HRS.CHARGED ZMi4y ENGINEER ASSISTANTS I HRS.CHARGED INSPECTION DATE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ON. S B —CONTRACTOR - Ix S:. 0 - (P-3, - toleg --6 ve 0.- Ce _SZ L u luv, %P T-eST— w Z -AIA- ve_e_s 0-( (, t( - co UC-Tvin 14-,- C>4- 2 - - COPY SENT TO CLIENT C) C�NTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 FPAGE OF CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTEDWORK UNLESS OTHERWISE SIGNATURE OF VNISTERED INSPECTOR NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED SPECIFICATIONS, AND I PLANS, APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE –( 4-��— S�XQ GOVERNING BU I LDING LAWS. DATE OF REPORT' REGISTER NUMBER J TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF . iltIV, -e Ak �/ (�krt of �12_ "_ffifiz (f ),Vr TT tcu Tit� of Ed (Quinta 1111ilbing 'allb �Sdfet� 3141i'leiion This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction or use. For the following: BUILDING ADDRESS Use Classification RETAIL 79-988 HWY 111 Bldg. Permit No. 13636 Group B--2/ B1 Type Construction VN —Fire Zone use zone CPS' Owner of Building PETER STURGEON Address (7898,a) HWY III City LA QUINTA . CA 92253 BY: RICHARD -L KIRKLAND Date: 5-12-95 POST IN A CONSVICUOUS PLACE