Loading...
2000 09 21 HPCLa �Q r _ 7i q �y�CFM OF'rKr'9��� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The Regular Meeting to be held in the Session Room at the La Quinta City Hall, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California September 21, 2000 3:00 P.M. Beginning Minute Motion 2000-018 CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call II. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Historic Preservation Commission on matters relating to historic resources within the City of La Quinta which are not Agenda items. When addressing the Historic Preservation Commission, please state your name and address and when discussing matters pertaining to prehistoric sites, do not disclose the exact location of the site(s) for their protection. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA I1���ZiP►b9�Ji �9e1��� I�7e1:i1 A. Approval of the regular Minutes for the meeting of July 27, 2000 V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of 5,000 Square Foot Site, located on the west side of Avenida Villa, north of Avenida Montezuma to allow a two story office building. Applicant: Coronel Construction Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (Jaynes Brock) HPC/AGENDA B. Phase I Archaeological Assessment of a 75 Acre Site for Proposed Monticello Project; located on the west side of Jefferson Street, between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue. Applicant: Century Homes Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (Jarnes Brock) C. Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-006; located at 49-499 Eisenhower Drive within the La Quinta Resort and Club to revise the entry area of the restaurant to the west of the Hotel Lobby. Applicant: KSL Desert Resorts, Inc. D. Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-001; located at 78-039 Calle Estado to allow a wood patio cover on front of the restaurant. Applicant: El Ranchito Restaurant, David and Alma Cetina Paleontological Resources Assessment - Phase I and Phase II Archaeological Testing of Seven Archaeological Sites. CA-RIV-6352 to -6357 (Pamilla); located at the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50`h Avenue. Applicant: RJT Homes, Chad Meyer, Project Manager Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love) VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS Vill. ADJOURNMENT 002 HK AGENDA MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-496 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 27, 2000 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Robert Wright at 3:04 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Irwin, Puente, Mitchell, and Chairman Wright. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to excuse Commissioner Sharp. Unanimously approved. Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio and Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Planning Manager Christine di lorio informed the Commissioners RJT Homes, applicant for Item "C", has asked to withdraw their application and will resubmit at a later date. They will present Phase I and II at one time. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Puente to table Item #C. Unanimously approved. B. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to approve the Minutes of June 15, 2000 as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. C:artification�Aoorooriateness 2000-O0M a request to allow a wood patio cover with a tile roof on the front of a restaurant located at 78-039 Calle Estado. Applicant: El Ranchito Restaurant - David and Alma Cetina. 003 PACAR0LYMHPC7-27-00.wpd -1- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Wright asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. David Cetina, owner of the El Ranchito Restaurant, gave a brief history of the restaurant and the improvements made over the years. The canvas cover was erected as a temporary patio cover; however, due to problems with the wind and high maintenance, he wishes to put up a more permanent structure as it is used extensively. He proposes to construct a wood beam structure with tile. 3. Chairman Wright asked Mr. John Weidenhamer, a local artiist who was working with Mr. Cetina, for his opinion on altering the facade of the building. Mr. Weidenhamer stated he had reviewed the drawings and the wood beam structure would be more attractive than the canvas as it would blend better and not block the roof gable ends. They would still be seen above the shed roof as well as the front of the building. Almost none of the building would be hidden. He did not think the design changed the facade, but was simply installing a replacement for the canvas patio cover that was already there. 4. Commissioner Mitchell expressed his dislike of the current canvas covering and agreed with staff's decision, based upon the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines. He also wondered if some compromise could be made to adequately address staff concerns to come up with a design that satisfies both the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines and would be cost-effective for the applicant He wondered if there were any other design possibilities 'besides the current proposed cover. 5. Mr. Cetina replied he had chosen this design because it was simple and with the open ceiling the tile would give the cover a rustic look. 6. Commissioner Mitchell commented that the structure was not appropriate for the style and period in which the building was built. He wondered if there was anything that could be done that wouldn't impact the feeling and design and stay within the guidelines of this structure. r� PACAROLYNMHPC7-27-OO.wpd -2- 0 0 4 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 7. Mr. Cetina pointed out he had chosen the wood trellis because this would be more harmonious with this architectural style than a stucco design. 8. Commissioner Mitchell stated it's the feeling of this structure that is of concern to staff and asked if a historic architect had been consulted. It was his opinion the Commission should have an opportunity to consider other alternatives. 9. Commissioner Irwin commented that she approved of the improvements the owner has done so far; even the temporary canvas cover was attractive because it did add some color to the building and was maintained well. However, the newly proposed patio cover seemed very massive for this size building. She thought it would be better if it wasn't a solid roof. She gave an example of an entryway at the La Quinta Hotel. There is ten years difference in the age of the buildings, but the many alterations blend so well it doesn't appear as though it has been altered at all. It maintains its integrity. Her concern was if a massive roof covering was installed on this size building, it would lose the integrity of the building. She also suggested adding some openness. 10. Commissioner Puente agreed and stated the building has; a very simple form, similar to the Old Spanish style, and the overhang is more like a Southwest style. It would appear as though the two styles are trying to clash. She suggested designing something with arches. 11. Chairman Wright expressed concern that this is a historic building, but this business is one of the few businesses in the Village area that had been around for a long period of time. In his opinion the patio was financially important to this business. He said he realized that it was a historic structure and recalled all the time spent on the Historical Society Museum and the Veterinary Hospital (the old lumber yard) making sure they were refurbished close to their original style. He asked Planning Manager di lorio about the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines and if the patio cover had to look exactly like the building or if it could be of a different style. P:\CAR0LYMHPC7-27.00.wpd -3- n„ . O O Jj Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 12. Planning Manager di lorio replied it was not necessary to match the historical structure. The Commission was concerned with the addition's massiveness, scale and its architectural integrity as it does stand on its own. One of the alternatives discussed was possibly breaking up the massiveness by having two structures. The goal was not trying to replicate, but to be compatible with a contemporary look; keeping in mind the character -defining features. 13. Chairman Wright asked if it made any difference that the canopy was not attached to the building? Planning Manager di lorio answered it did not. One of the initial concerns was the structural integrity of the building and the applicant has been very sensitive in re -designing the awning without touching the historic building. 14. Chairman Wright said he would like to see another design other than the canvas since it does not provide protection from the heat; Whereas, tile, or a solid structure would provide some protection as the patio is used year-round. 15. Commissioner Irwin disagreed, saying she has a solid roof patio covering on her house which retains the heat, even with fans. She maintained the addition of the patio cover would not make the patio more useable year-round because of the intense heat in June, July and August. 16. Chairman Wright commented that no one would be able to sit outside during those months, but he wanted to work hard with this business to make this thing work. He suggested the Commission and staff provide the applicant with some additional ideas as well as the applicant look at hiring a historic architect. 17. Planning Manager di lorio reiterated staff's position and added there will be a funding program, starting in September for businesses in the Village Commercial area. This would provide the applicant with additional funds to cover the cost of hiring a historic architect. 18. Chairman Wright asked if the applicant was aware of the program. 19. Mr. Cetina stated he had received something from the City P:\CAR0t.YN\HPC7-27-00.Yia -4- »... 1006 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 regarding a Commercial Property Improvement Program but had not had time to review it. 20. Planning Manager di lorio informed the applicant a presentation would be given at City Hall that evening. She offered to provide him with a brochure and another copy of the letter, at the end of the meeting. 21. Chairman Wright reiterated his support for all the commercial businesses in the Village area that the Commission work as close as possible to support them as the City is working very hard to revitalize the Village. He then asked staff what the Commissions options would be. 22. Planning Manager di lorio gave three alternatives: 1. Take action on staff's recommendation; 2. Deny the application as submitted; or, 3. Continue the request and ask that the applicant work with staff to reach a solution based on the Commission's direction. 23. Chairman Wright stated he would prefer to continue the project as he did not want to deny it. 24. Commissioner Irwin stated she didn't want to approve the application as submitted and compromise the high standards the Commission has worked hard to maintain. The historic preservation of La Quinta is important and in this instance she did not want to compromise the integrity of the building. In her opinion the design did damage and obstruct the architectural features of the historic structure. 25. Commissioner Mitchell agreed and stated the role of the Commission was to assist people, but in this instance after looking at the proposed patio cover plan he thought there could be an alternative. The structure was built in the 30's. If it had been constructed in 1936, what would they have built? He suggested, the applicant use vines to soften the facade which could be trained to cover the top. This could create a problem with maintenance in terms of leaf droppings. He too, concurred with continuing this item to allow the applicant to come up with some viable alternatives. 26. Mr. Cetina told the Commission he had first considered building stucco columns in the front and then decided it was going to be PACAROLYNMHPC7-27.00.wpd -5- 007 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 too massive. He then considered lattice, and then metal. Fie then decided on wood posts since they were a lot nicer than the canvas and would be more compatible with the building's design style. 27. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the applicant might want to go to some archives like the Library of the Historical Society and look at some old pictures of buildings of the 1930's to get an idea of what was used in that time period and would be better suiited for his use. 28. Chairman Wright asked Planning Manager di lorio if she remembered the patio cover on the back of Tradition that was approved by the Commission and what type of construction was used. Planning Manager di lorio stated it was post and beam construction. Chairman Wright asked if that was an alternative. Planning Manager di lorio answered it was. 29. Mr. Weidenhamer asked if the current design plan utilized post and beam construction. 30. Planning Manager di lorio replied it was, but had some tile work as well. She then read the letter about the Commercial Improvement Program and verified the time and date of July 271h, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 31. Chairman Wright reiterated his support to maintain the integrity of every structure by maintaining the architectural guidelines of structures built in their time period, but recommended continuing this project to give the applicant time to work with staff to redesign the patio cover. He felt it was necessary to be very sensitive due to the possibility of additions to the Historical Society or the Veterinary Hospital. The situation would be: similar and the Commission would have some guideline to follow. 32. Commissioner Irwin suggested the applicant visit the Walter Morgan House or the Cyrus Pierce House to see what type of patio structures were used. 33. Planning Manager di lorio said the Cyrus Pierce House has a different type of roof line. It has a patio with a covered area, but is a side -facing gable so it just extends off of the gable whereas, P:\CAROLYN\HPC7.27-OO.wpd -6- ''' 008 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 the restaurant has a unique roof pitch with the front facing gable and attached shed roof design. The Morgan House is in the; back and was a later addition in the Monterey -style. 34. Mr. Cetina asked for direction on design guidelines. 35. Chairman Wright had suggested Mr. Weidenhamer might be able to help with the architectural designs as he was familiar with the building's construction. 36. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the applicant look at other Spanish -style structures, outside the Valley, to see what patio structures could be designed that would keep the feeling, association, and integrity of the historic structure. 37. Mr. Cetina referenced buildings he had seen in Mexico as this was where his concept had originated from. That type of architecture did not have anything underneath the beams. You can :see the tile. Some of the homes are that way with lattice and tile on top. 38, Chairman Wright commented that style was the trend and he liked the look. He wasn't so concerned with the style as the problem of protruding into the street, looking directly at the building, having the patio cover take away from the lines architecturally. This building is one of the only three historic commercial structures left in the Village area. He suggested the applicant take advantage of the meeting scheduled for that evening. 39. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to continue this item to the meeting of September 21, 2000, to give the applicant an opportunity to attending the Commercial Property Improvement Program meeting and prepared revisions for the Commission. Unanimously approved. B. Final Report on Archaeotaw__Monitorina for Tract 239g5: located on the north bank of the Whitewater River Storm Channel between Washington Street and Adams Street. Applicant: Century -Crowell Communities (Sienna Del Rey) - Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (James Brock). P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -7 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff passed out additional information regarding submission of materials for City curation: a. "Collected cultural/paleontological resources will be delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property, properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes. Materials will be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics." Planning Manager di lorio expressed concern as to the timing of the curation materials which might have to be further along in the process than at the building permit period because there may be more time needed to do the final report. She will pursue this further with the City's Building & Safety Department. 2. Commissioner Mitchell had no objections. 3. Commissioner Irwin had no objection with the monitoring, but questioned the new material that talked about properly packaging the final report for long-term curation as she did not think staples should be used in the reports. 4. After discussion, the condition was amended as follows: a "Collected cultural/paleontological resources will be delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property, properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, staple -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes. Materials will be placed within an acid -free binder and shall include a descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics." 5. Commissioner Puente then asked when digging would begin on the project. 010 P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -8- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 6. Planning Manager di Iorio responded it was currently under construction. 7. Commissioner Irwin stated the area that had been monitored backed up to the Whitewater Storm Channel. 8. Commissioner Irwin asked if the Commission would be reviewing material before a Certificate of Occupancy was issued. Planning Manager di Iorio stated houses were currently under construction and that was why it was being brought before the Commission at this time. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente/Irwin to adopt Minute Motion 2000-016 accepting the Final Report on Archaeological Monitoring for Tract 23995 with correction to the conditions as noted above. Unanimously approved. C. Review and A Baance of CUratlon Guidelines. 1. Planning Manager di Iorio gave a brief report on the Collections Management Plan. The Management Plan had been sent: to the various local Indian Tribal Governments and no comments had been received She then asked if there were any questions. 2. Commissioner Irwin questioned the first page, where it: talked about the Historic Preservation Commission, under the 'Mission Statement, "Certain minor items need review and amendment - particularly regarding archaeology and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - but the intent of the ordinance is clear." She wanted to know what the Consultant, Roberta Greenwood was referring to. 3. Planning Manager di Iorio responded that since adoption of the City's Ordinance, CEQA has been changed to be more specific in regard to archaeology and the pursuit of preservation of sites and treatment of human remains. This was updating the document to be more current CEQA requirements. In addition, the City's General Plan will contain a new section, Cultural Resources, The City's Ordinance will be changed to be in agreement with the P:\CAROLYh'\HPC7-27-00.wpd -9 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 General Plan. 4. Commissioner Irwin asked if this would be reviewed by the Commission. Planning Manager di lorio stated the Commission would review it when it was complete. 5. Commissioner Irwin questioned why an outside consultant was needed when staff could do this. Planning Manager di lorio responded that it would be beneficial to have a consultant do it because they would be able to draw from different documents that had been prepared by other cities in the State that would fit the City's needs better. 6. Commissioner Puente inquired if the Guidelines had to be approved as presented or could changes be made at a later time. Planning Manager di lorio clarified that parts of the Guidelines may be updated or change in the future, such as when the City has proper facilities. Right now this document will serve as the basis to build on. 7. Commissioner Irwin commented on the trip the Commissioners took to Fort Irwin which made reading this document easier and more understandable. 8. Chairman Wright complimented staff and the consultant on the fine job and asked staff if they were looking for acceptance; at this meeting. Planning Manager di lorio stated yes and asked if the Commissioners had any further questions she could relay them to the Consultant before a final document was prepared for consideration by the City Council. 9. Chairman Wright observed the Guidelines were a work in progress and could be amended as necessary. 10. Commissioner Irwin requested the Commission send the Consultant, Roberta Greenwood, a letter expressing their thanks. 11. Commissioner Mitchell asked for staff's impression of the work. Planning Manager di lorio replied it was a good beginning as It gave staff the language needed to implement the document. 12. Commissioner Puente asked what the next step was in identifying historic buildings and how would they proceed from there. Oj2 P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd - O' Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 13. Commissioner Irwin stated her concern regarding the commercial building just reviewed by the Commission as well as all the other houses that were built in the 40's that should be on the City's Historic List. What is the next step in identifying them? 14. Planning Manager di lorio responded that there have been many house sales in the Cove and the owners were being directed to the Community Development Department by the Building Department to check and see if they had been included in the City's survey. Most of the houses staff has seen were block -construction built during the 40's houses. They have basically the same style as the stucco homes, but in the 40's they were being built with block and were not listed on the City's survey. 15. Commissioner Irwin stated the Desert Club Homes should be added as they are a separate group. 16. Planning Manager di lorio agreed and stated there were more homes which needed to be included on the Historic Building Survey. She also added one of the directions in the curation document was to find out where our materials are and to document them. 17. Chairman Wright asked for confirmation on whether or riot the Commission had the authority to make recommendations on residences as they do on commercial buildings. 18. Planning Manager di lorio replied this was correct. Until there is a local designation there is no mechanism to trigger such a review by the Commission, except for demolitions and that is the other concern regarding new purchasers of these homes. Most people buying them are because of their historic significance so there is some sensitivity, but some don't necessarily understand its importance. It would be beneficial if we had some input into residential purchase/preservation efforts. P:\CAROLYMHPC7-27-00.wpd -t t- 0.13 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 19. Chairman Wright agreed and commented funds were not available and or no notification mechanism available with residential homes as there is with commercial, but after the Guidelines are prepared that may change. He again offered to be of help to any applicant and staff in re -design of the building. 20. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2000-017 accepting the Curation Guidelines as submitted. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioner Irwin asked if all the Commissioners had completed the training necessary for the CLG for the year. Planning Manager di lorio replied no further training was necessary. B. Commissioner Irwin asked if members could attend the Historic Preservation Conference coming October in Los Angeles. Planning Manger di lorio replied the Conference in March, 2001 had been budgeted for education. She added, if the Commissioners were interested in attending the Barstow Conference in May, 2001, she would look into funding approval, or the Historic Preservation Conference in San Diego this year. Commissioners Irwin and Wright expressed interest in attending the Barstow Conference. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Puente to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next scheduled meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on August 17, 2000. This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was adjourned at 4:04 p.m., July 27, 2000. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: Carol yp alker �� 4 Secretary P:ICAR0LYMHPC7-27-00.wpd -12- BI #A DATE: ITEM: LOCATION APPLICANT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT: BACKGROUND: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF 5,000 SQUARE FOOT SITE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA VILLA, NORTH OF AVENIDA MONTEZUMA CORONEL CONSTRUCTION ARCHAEOLOGICAL ADVISORY GROUP (JAMES BROCK) The property is an irregularly shaped, graded site in the Village area of La Quinta, north of Frances Hack Park. A Phase I cultural assessment survey of the site has been submitted to allow development of a two story office project. DISCUSSION: A records search was conducted through the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System at UC Riverside. The search found the study area (project site) had not been included in any previous archaeological studies and no cultural resources had been previously recorded on or in the immediate vicinity of the study area. An archival records search was conducted and no prehistoric or historic resources were determined to exist on the study area. During the field survey of the study area, no historic or prehistoric sites, features, structures or isolates were observed. AAG states it is unlikely that any buried cultural deposits are present on the study area. Usually there are some surface indicators for buried sites in La Quinta. Based on the fact that the site has been previously graded, the lack of on -site and nearby cultural resources, monitoring of any grading or trenching is not recommended. p[\stan\hpc rpt vup 2000-003 ph 1 .wpd RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 2000- , accepting : 1.) The "Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of APN 777-075-010, La Quinta, California", as prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group Attachment: Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of APN 777-075-010, La Quinta, California (Commissioners only) Prepared by: Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner Submitted By: di lorio PI ni3 nin Manager Christineg g 616 p[\stan\hpc rpt vup 2000-003 ph 1.wpd BI #E3 DATE: ITEM: LOCATION: APPLICANT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT: BACKGROUND: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 21. 2000 PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF 75 ACRE SITE FOR PROPOSED MONTICELLO PROJECT WEST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET, BETWEEN FRED WARING DRIVE AND MILES AVENUE CENTURY HOMES ARCHAEOLOGICAL ADVISORY GROUP (JAMES BROCK) The property is a rectangular 75 acre parcel in north La Quinta south of Fred Waring Drive and west of Jefferson Street. A Phase I archaeological assessment of the 75 acre site has been submitted in anticipation of a future development residential/commercial project. DISCUSSION: A records search was conducted through the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System at UC Riverside. The search found the study area (project site) had been included in three previous archaeological studies, the first in 1979. The study area is in an area of high archaeological sensitivity because it is located close to the shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla. As a result of those studies, four prehistoric sites have been recorded on the study area: CA-RIV- 1769, CA-RIV-3667, CA-RIV-3668, and CA-RIV-3675. An archival search did not indicate that any structures ever existed on the property. There was evidence that a dirt road run east -west through the middle of the site, but there is no sign of the road now or during the previous archaeological studies. A field survey of the study area was conducted with no new archaeologicall sites or isolates found. Although a surface collection and some hand excavation and surface scrapes was conducted in 1989, cultural materials were found at three of the four sites. This is probably due to wind erosion which has occurred since the 1989 survey. This material consists of pottery sherds, thermally affected clay, bone fragments, stone fragments, charcoal, and thermally affected rock. p[\stan\hpc rpt sw fred w jeff ph 1.wpd The report states there are abundant cultural resources present on the property, particularly on site CA-RIV-1769. There is potential for buried prehistoric sines to be present on the site. The previous Arkush test program conducted in 1989 did not include any backhoe testing, although it was recommended in the McCarthy study of 1989. Therefore, the study area has not been fully tested. A research design has been prepared for the study area to organize research and interpret findings. The research topics to be considered during the Phase II testing are subsistence, practices, settlement systems, and site structure and formative processes. Due to sand accumulation in the dune environment, there is a distinct possibility that archaeological sites can be discovered during backhoe testing in areas with no, or minimal surface indicators. Archaeological Advisory Group (AAG) recommends that the backhoe testing as recommended by McCarthy (1989) be completed. AAG recommends excavation of two meter deep trenches in a systematic grid of no greater than 50 meter intervals in the previously recorded sites with the excavated dirt screened through a mesh of no greater than one -quarter inch. Trench length should be whatever is required to meet the two meter depth goal. Additionally, monitoring of future grading should be conducted by, or under the supervision of, a Registered Professional Archaeologist, or equivalent. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 2000- , accepting : The "Phase I Archaeological Assessment for the Proposed Monticello Project, West Side of Jefferson Street Between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue, La Quinta. California", as prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, subject to the following conditions: 1. Collected cultural/paleontological resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene sel-seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property. Materials will be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. 2. The Phase II testing report shall be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission prior to approval of a development application for the study area. 018 p[\stan\hpc rpt sw fred w jeff ph 1.wpd Attachment: 1 . Phase I Archaeological Assessment for the Proposed Monticello Project, West Side of Jefferson Street Between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue, La Quinta, California, La Quinta, California (Commissioners only) Prepared by: F7, cJlil/11/ A. Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner Submitted By: iau SUr' Christine di lorio, Planning Manager 0:19 pl\stan\hpc rpt sw fred w jeff ph 7.wpd B I #C'r DATE: ITEM: REQUEST: APPLICANTS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BACKGROUND: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2000-006 REQUEST TO REVISE THE ENTRY AREA OF THE RESTAURANT TO THE WEST OF THE HOTEL LOBBY ENTRY AREA 49499 EISENHOWER DRIVE, WITHIN THE LA QUINTA RESORT AND CLUB KSL DESERT RESORTS, INC. (ANDREA MERRILL-(MOCK) STAMPER WHITIN WORKS The restaurant is in a building which is a part of the original La Quinta Hotel, which was constructed in 1926-27. While the hotel and its grounds have been designated by the City as historic, the original character defining historic features have been altered in the building in which this restaurant is in. Although altered enough to exclude its inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places, the original hotel buildings still possess architectural integrity at the local level. It has set the tone for development of the entire City and therefore, modifications are of importance. The Municipal Code requires that revisions or additions to designated historic structures obtain approval from the City Council. This requires review and recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission. PROPOSED REVISIONS: The restaurant is located to the west of the hotel registration area, in front of the plaza and valet area. The previous Montahas restaurant is closed and being remodeled into a seafood restaurant called Azur. The applicant is proposing to modify the entry area to improve its visibility to guests. The proposal is to move the existing double arched wood doors which were installed in 1988 approximately 12 feet to the north, away from the interior corner of the "L" p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-006 Iq resort.wpd 020 shaped building. In front of the new door location, a freestanding wood trellis supported by eight smooth plastered columns, similar in design to the one over the lobby entry without the tile roofing, will be constructed. The terra cotta tile walkways in front of the restaurant and between the lobby entry and fountain will be reconstructed to correspond with the new entry. Material colors and finishes will match that used in the existing building and walks, except that small blue tile accents will be added to the rectangular terra cotta tile walkway beneath the new trellis. A new false window is show to the left of the new door location. With the revision to the walkways, most of the adjacent landscaping will be replanted. Plants retained include the large Ficus near the south wall of the restaurant, the Palm tree at the east end near the lobby entry, and bougainvillea against the west wall of the restaurant. The theme of the new landscaping includes plants that are primarily "blue" or "white". DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, the request can be approved if, and only if, it is determined: 1 . That the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely affect any architectural or landscape improvement. RESPONSE: The proposed design modifications are in keeping with the architectural character of the historic structures on the hotel grounds. The new landscaping and walkways will not significantly modify the plaza area in front of the restaurant. 2. If the owner of the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such property cannot be economically used and denial of a permit would deprive the owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City Council may issue the permit with an effective date 180 days from the issuance of the permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed in the permit application, such as acquisition of site improvement by the City or a public interest group. RESPONSE: The proposed revision to the entry area to a non-contributing building is in keeping with character of the historic complex. 3. In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible with the external appearance of existing historically designated improvements on said site. 021 p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-006 Iq resort.wpd RESPONSE: The trellis while similar to the lobby entry trellis and therefore, compatible, will be freestanding and not have a clay tile covering, thus providing differentiation from the original construction. 4. That the applicant has presented clear and convincing evidence of facts demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City Council that such disapproval will impose immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be property owner, tenant, or resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the particular improvement, or other feature involved, and that approval of the application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures. RESPONSE: The applicant has shown that the revision to the restaurant will improve access and visibility from adjacent areas, the design as presented is compatible with the existing construction, and the applicant has shown a desire to maintain design modifications compatible with the historic integrity of the structure. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 2000-_, recommending approval of the requested revision to the restaurant entry. Attachment 1. Proposed plan exhibits 2. Applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties 3. Preservation Brief 14 Prepared by: Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner Submitted by: Christine di lorio, Panning Manager p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-006 Iq resort.wpd BI #C) HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 ITEM: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2000-001 REQUEST: REQUEST TO ALLOW A WOOD PATIO COVER ON FRONT OF RESTAURANT LOCATION: 78039 CALLE ESTADO APPLICANTS: EL RANCHITO RESTAURANT (DAVID AND ALMA CETINA) BACKGROUND: Previous HPC Review: This request was previously reviewed at the Historic Preservation meeting of July 27, 2000 (Attachment 1). After extensive discussion, it was continued to this meeting to allow the applicant to redesign his patio cover in a manner which is compatible with the architecture of the historic building built in 1936. The entire building is being utilized as a restaurant, but in the past has been used for various commercial businesses. The one story building has painted brick walls, with a low pitched gable and shed roof covered with red clay tile. Across the east side of the front of the building is a canvas awning patio cover and short steel picket fence that was installed approximately two years ago. The Municipal Code requires that additions to designated historic structures obtain approval from the City Council. This requires review and recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission. PROPOSED ADDITION: The applicant has revised his proposal to include two freestanding wood trellis patio covers without a tile roof element. The trellis' would be separated by the middle set of existing doors. The easterly trellis would be horizontal below the existing wall sign, while the westerly trellis would follow the slope of the shed roof. A short slumpblock/iron railing scalloped wall would enclose the outdoor area. A four foot wide sidewalk would be provided between the wall and street curb. The proposed patio would be constructed out of wood with ten 6" by 6" posts clad in plaster supporting the cover. The easterly column has been moved inward from the edge of p:\stan\hpc rpt ca2000-001 rev el ranchito.wpd ,.... 02 2 the building to minimize impact and show more of the building. The cover will not be attached to the building, with a one inch separation from the building provided. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, the request can be approved if, and only if, it is determined: 1. That the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely affect any architectural or landscape improvement. 2. If the owner of the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such property cannot be economically used and denial of a permit would deprive the owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City Council may issue the permit with an effective date 180 days from the issuance of the permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed in the permit application, such as acquisition of site improvement by the City or a public interest group. 3. In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible with the external appearance of existing historically designated improvements on said site. 4. That the applicant has presented clear and convincing evidence of facts demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City Council that such disapproval will impose immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be property owner, tenant, or resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the particular improvement, or other feature involved, and that approval of the application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures. RESPONSE: With the revised trellis the findings needed to be made can be met. The elimination of the tile element and use of two trellis' is compatiible with the existing building and minimizes the impact on the facade while providing the protection the applicant desires. The removal of the: tile roof element allows the existing tile element to be the primary focus and while using two trellis' lightens the appearance of the trellis. The proposed addition as redesigned complies with the recommended Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The character -defining features of the historic building are not obscured with the size and scale of the revised design. �... 024 p:\stan\hpc rpt ca2000-001 rev el ranchito.wpd RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Minute Motion 2000-_, recommending approval of the requested addition to the restaurant, subject to the following conditions: 1. Accurate, scaled drawings of the proposed construction, with color and material samples shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The column material and finish shall match that used on the building. 3. The westerly trellis shall be horizontal, rather than sloped. 4. The westerly columns shall be moved easterly away from the edge of the building to match the distance between the edge of the building and the easterly columns. Attachments: 1. Minutes of July 27, 2000, Historic Preservation Meeting 2. Proposed revised plan exhibits 3. Applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties 4. Preservation Brief 14 Prepared by: Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner Submitted by: ti Christine di lorio, Planning Manager 0c,5 p:\stan\hpc rpt ca2000-001 rev el ranchito.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 A. Certification of Appropriateness 2000-005 a request to allow a wood patio cover with a tile roof on the front of a restaurant located at 78-039 Calle Estado. Applicant: El Ranchito Restaurant - David and Alma Cetina. 1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Wright asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. David Cetina, owner of the El Ranchito Restaurant, gave a brief history of the restaurant and the improvements made over the years. The canvas cover was erected as a temporary patio cover; however, due to problems with the wind and high maintenance, he wishes to put up a more permanent structure as it is used extensively. He proposes to construct a wood beam structure with tile. 3. Chairman Wright asked Mr. John Weidenhamer, a local artist who was working with Mr. Cetina, for his opinion on altering the facade of the building. Mr. Weidenhamer stated he had reviewed the drawings and the wood beam structure would be: more attractive than the canvas as it would blend better and not block the roof gable ends. They would still be seen above the shed roof as well as the front of the building. Almost none of the building would be hidden. He did not think the design changed the facade, but was simply installing a replacement for the canvas patio cover that was already there. 4. Commissioner Mitchell expressed his dislike of the current canvas covering and agreed with staff's decision, based upon the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines. He also wondered if some compromise could be made to adequately address staff concerns to come up with a design that satisfies both the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines and would be cost-effective for the applicant He wondered if there were any other design possibilities besides the current proposed cover. 5. Mr. Cetina replied he had chosen this design because it was simple and with the open ceiling the tile would give the cover a rustic look. PACAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -2- ... 02 6 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 6. Commissioner Mitchell commented that the structure was not appropriate for the style and period in which the building was built. He wondered if there was anything that could be done that wouldn't impact the feeling and design and stay within the guidelines of this structure. 7. Mr. Cetina pointed out he had chosen the wood trellis because this' would be more harmonious with this architectural style than a stucco design. 8. Commissioner Mitchell stated it's the feeling of this structure that is of concern to staff and asked if a historic architect had been consulted. It was his opinion the Commission should have an opportunity to consider other alternatives. 9. Commissioner Irwin commented that she approved of the improvements the owner has done so far; even the temporary canvas cover was attractive because it did add some color to the building and was maintained well. However, the newly proposed patio cover seemed very massive for this size building. She thought it would be better if it wasn't a solid roof. She gave an example of an entryway at the La Quinta Hotel. There is ten years difference in the age of the buildings, but the: many alterations blend so well it doesn't appear as though it has been altered at all. It maintains its integrity. Her concern was if a massive roof covering was installed on this size building, it would lose the integrity of the building. She also suggested adding some openness. 10. Commissioner Puente agreed and stated the building has a very simple form, similar to the Old Spanish style, and the overhang is more like a Southwest style. It would appear as though the two styles are trying to clash. She suggested designing sornething with arches. P:\CAROLPN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -3- 612 7 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 11. Chairman Wright expressed concern that this is a historic building, but this business is one of the few businesses in the Village area that had been around for a long period of time. In his opinion the patio was financially important to this business. He said he realized that it was a historic structure and recalled all the time spent on the Historical Society Museum and the Veterinary Hospital (the old lumber yard) making sure they were refurbished close to their original style. He asked Planning Manager di lorio about the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines and if the patio cover had to look exactly like the building or if it could be of a different style. 12. Planning Manager di lorio replied it was not necessary to match the historical structure. The Commission was concerned with the addition's massiveness, scale and its architectural integrity as it does stand on its own. One of the alternatives discussed was possibly breaking up the massiveness by having two structures. The goal was not trying to replicate, but to be compatible with a contemporary look; keeping in mind the character -defining features. 13. Chairman Wright asked if it made any difference that the canopy was not attached to the building? Planning Manager di lorio answered it did not. One of the initial concerns was the structural integrity of the building and the applicant has been very sensitive in re -designing the awning without touching the historic building. 14. Chairman Wright said he would like to see another design other than the canvas since it does not provide protection from the heat; Whereas, tile, or a solid structure would provide some protection as the patio is used year-round. 15. Commissioner Irwin disagreed, saying she has a solid roof patio covering on her house which retains the heat, even with fans. She maintained the addition of the patio cover would not make the patio more useable year-round because of the intense heat in June, July and August. 16. Chairman Wright commented that no one would be able: to sit outside during those months, but he wanted to work hard with this business to make this thing work. He suggested the Commission and staff provide the applicant with some additional ideas as well as the applicant look at hiring a historic arc tect. r.. . P:\CAR0LYN\1iPC7-27-00,wpd -4- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 17. Planning Manager di lorio reiterated staff's position and added there will be a funding program, starting in September for businesses in the Village Commercial area. This would provide the applicant with additional funds to cover the cost of hiring a historic architect. 18. Chairman Wright asked if the applicant was aware of the program. 19. Mr. Cetina stated he had received something from the City regarding a Commercial Property Improvement Program but had not had time to review it. 20. Planning Manager di lorio informed the applicant a presentation would be given at City Hall that evening. She offered to provide him with a brochure and another copy of the letter, at the end of the meeting. 21. Chairman Wright reiterated his support for all the commercial businesses in the Village area that the Commission work as close as possible to support them as the City is working very hard to revitalize the Village. He then asked staff what the Commissions options would be. 22. Planning Manager di lorio gave three alternatives: 1. Take action on staff's recommendation; 2. Deny the application as submitted; or, 3. Continue the request and ask that the applicant work with staff to reach a solution based on the Commission's direction. 23. Chairman Wright stated he would prefer to continue the project as he did not want to deny it. 24. Commissioner Irwin stated she didn't want to approve the application as submitted and compromise the high standards the Commission has worked hard to maintain. The historic preservation of La Quinta is important and in this instance she did not want to compromise the integrity of the building. In her opinion the design did damage and obstruct the architectural features of the historic structure. 029 P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -5- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 25. Commissioner Mitchell agreed and stated the role of the Commission was to assist people, but in this instance after looking at the proposed patio cover plan he thought there could be an alternative. The structure was built in the 30's. If it had been constructed in 1936, what would they have built? He suggested, the applicant use vines to soften the facade which could be trained to cover the top. This could create a problem with maintenance in terms of leaf droppings. He too, concurred with continuing this item to allow the applicant to come up with some viable alternatives. 26. Mr. Cetina told the Commission he had first considered building stucco columns in the front and then decided it was going to be too massive. He then considered lattice, and then metal. Fie then decided on wood posts since they were a lot nicer than the canvas and would be more compatible with the building's design style. 27. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the applicant might want to go to some archives like the Library of the Historical Society and look at some old pictures of buildings of the 1930's to get an idea of what was used in that time period and would be better suited for his use. 28. Chairman Wright asked Planning Manager di lorio if she remembered the patio cover on the back of Tradition that was approved by the Commission and what type of construction was used. Planning Manager di lorio stated it was post and beam construction. Chairman Wright asked if that was an alternative. Planning Manager di lorio answered it was. 29. Mr. Weidenhamer asked if the current design plan utilized post and beam construction. 30, Planning Manager di lorio replied it was, but had some the work as well. She then read the letter about the Commercial Improvement Program and verified the time and date of July 27`", at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -6- 930 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 31. Chairman Wright reiterated his support to maintain the integrity of every structure by maintaining the architectural guidelines of structures built in their time period, but recommended continuing this project to give the applicant time to work with staff to redesign the patio cover. He felt it was necessary to be very sensitive due to the possibility of additions to the Historical Society or the Veterinary Hospital. The situation would be similar and the Commission would have some guideline to follow. 32. Commissioner Irwin suggested the applicant visit the Walter Morgan House or the Cyrus Pierce House to see what type of patio structures were used. 33. Planning Manager di lorio said the Cyrus Pierce House has a different type of roof line. It has a patio with a covered area, but is a side -facing gable so it just extends off of the gable whereas, the restaurant has a unique roof pitch with the front facing gable and attached shed roof design. The Morgan House is in the back and was a later addition in the Monterey -style. 34. Mr. Cetina asked for direction on design guidelines. 35. Chairman Wright had suggested Mr. Weidenhamer might be able to help with the architectural designs as he was familiar with the building's construction. 36. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the applicant look at: other Spanish -style structures, outside the Valley, to see what patio structures could be designed that would keep the feeling, association, and integrity of the historic structure. 37. Mr. Cetina referenced buildings he had seen in Mexico as this was where his concept had originated from. That type of architecture did not have anything underneath the beams. You can :see the tile. Some of the homes are that way with lattice and tile on top. 38. Chairman Wright commented that style was the trend and he liked the look. He wasn't so concerned with the style as the problem of protruding into the street, looking directly at the building, having the patio cover take away from the lines architecturally. This building is one of the only three historic commercial structures left in the Village area. He suggested the applicant take advantage of the meeting scheduled for that evening. 031 P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -7- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 27, 2000 39. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to continue this item to the meeting of September 21, 2000, to give the applicant an opportunity to attending the Commercial Property Improvement Program meeting and prepared revisions for the Commission. Unanimously approved. B. Fin I Ar I i I M_ rin f r Tr 2 located on the orth bank of the Whitewater River Storm Channel between Washi ton Street and Adams Street. Applicant: Century -Crowell Commu 'ties (Sienna Del Rey) - Archaeological Consultant: Archaeolo ical Advisory Group (James Brock). 1. Plari g Manager Christine di lorio presented the staff report, a copy o which is on file in the Community Development Departm nt. Staff passed out additional information regarding submissio of materials for City curation: a. "Colle ted cultural/paleontological resources will be deliver to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the operty, properly packaged for long term curation, in polye hylene self -seal bags, vials, or film tens as appropriat\ all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes. Materials will be accompanied\ by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics." Planning Manager di lorio expressed concern as to the timing of the curation materials which might have to be further along in the process than at the building permit period because there may be more time needed to do\the final report. She will pursue this further with the City's Building & Safety Department. 2. Commissioner Mitchell had no objections. 3. Commissioner Irwin had no objection with the monitoring, but questioned the new material that talked about properly packaging the final report for long-term curation as she did not think ;staples should be used in the reports. P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -8- 11 0 3 2 BI #E: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 ITEM: PHASE I PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND PHASE 11 INTERIM REPORT ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING OF SEVEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES, CA-RIV- 6352 TO -6357 (PALMILLA) LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND 50TH AVENUE APPLICANT: RJT HOMES (CHAD MEYER, PROJECT MANAGER) ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT: CRM TECH (BRUCE LOVE, PRINCIPAL) - PHASE II PALEONTOLOGICAL CONSULTANT: LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. - PHASE I BACKGROUND: In anticipation of a future development proposal on approximately 80 acres at the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and 501h Avenue, a paleontological and Phase 1 archaeological assessment has been completed for the site. The applicant has also prepared a Phase II archaeological testing program on their property. After approval of their research design by the Community Development Department a Phase II archaeological testing program was completed by CRM TECH. This consisted of testing of the six previously known archaeological sites, and one new site found during the Phase I assessment. DISCUSSION: Archaeological: CRM TECH has prepared an interim report on the archaeological testing and evaluation of six prehistoric sites and one new site found during the Phase I assessment. This interim report does not include artifact analysis results and discussion of research questions in the context of regional prehistory. The report states these subjects will be included in the final report which will be submitted to the City for approvall prior to 033 p:\stan\hpc rpt rjt homes sw jefferson & 501h. wpd the beginning of building construction. Staff recommends the final report be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Testing of the sites included surface collection, surface scrape, test units and backhoe trenches as noted in the report. Artifacts recovered included ceramic pottery sherds, burned clay, chipped stone, animal and fish bone, and some shell fragments. The report states the only features of interest are the fire affected clay with stick impressions found at Site CA-RIV-6356 and a concentration of fish bone found in the sand ridge at Site CA-RIV- 6353. This fish bone concentration has; similar characteristics to two features found north of 50T' Avenue at Site CA-RIV-3013. The report concludes that none of the sites qualify as historical resources and therefore, does not meet the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) criteria for importance. While an analysis of the fish bone is forthcoming, it does not appear to have potential to make important contributions to the Coachella Valley prehistory. The artifact recovery of the scatter of fired clay pieces with stick impressions has the potential to provide information on the prehistoric use of fired clay. The recovery of this material eliminates the criterion that made this site significant at the conclusion of the Phase I survey. Archaeological monitoring of grading and other earth -moving activities is recommended in the report. Collected cultural materials are to be given to the City for curation as noted in the report prior to issuance of the first building permit. Paleontological LSA Associates has conducted a records search through the Regional Paleontological Locality Inventory (RPL1) located at the San Bernardino County Museum to identify all previous paleontological resource assessments and localities within one mile of the project area. A response has not yet been received. The literature search, utilized materials in the library of LSA Associates and the personal library of the staff paleontologist. The area is known to be within the high shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla, with the sediments underlying the project area consisting of lake sediments of Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene Age and near shore alluvium. These types of sediments are known to contain paleontological resources elsewhere in the Coachella Valley. A field survey of the project area was conducted on the project area. No vertebrate fossils were located on the surface. However, green -gray clay silts were found in the lowest areas of the project site. Excavation for the proposed project has potential to impact significant nonrenewable paleontological resources. A paleontological resource impact program (PRIMP) is p:\stan\hpc rpt rjt homes sw jefferson & 50°".wpd 034 recommended for construction excavation on the project site. This will include excavation monitoring and specimen recovery including screen washing. A final compliance report will be submitted and provide details of fossil identification, cataloging, and repository arrangements. The report states that the fossils from the project area are to be housed in a museum repository for permanent curation and storage. The location of the museum repository is not specified. RECOMMENDATION: 1.) Adopt Minute Motion 2000-, accepting the Interim Cultural Resources Report for Archaeological Testing and Evaluation of Sites CA-RIV-6352 to - 6357 at the southwest corner of 50T" Avenue and Jefferson Street, subject to the final report being submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2.) Adopt Minute Motion 2000-_, accepting the final report on the Paleontological Resource Assessment for RJT Homes, subject to collected paleontological resources being given to the City for curation as follows: "Collected cultural/paleontological resources will be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene sel-seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property, Materials will be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the; original graphics." Attachments: 1. Interim Cultural Resources Report for Archaeological Testing and Evaluation of Sites CA-RIV-6352 to -6357 at the southwest corner of 50T" Avenue and Jefferson Street, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California (Commissioners only) 2.. Report on Paleontological Resource Assessment for RJT Homes, La Quinta, Riverside County, California (Commissioners only) Prepared by: Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner Submitted by: (IIJA t-- j ci�, Christine di lorio, PI nning Manager p:\stan\hpc rpt rjt homes sw jefferson & 501".wpd