2000 11 09 HPCCF`7 OF'C1�Y'9
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
The Special Meeting to be held in the Session Room at the
La Quinta City Hall, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
November 9, 2000
3:00 P.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2000-026
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Historic Preservation
Commission on matters relating to historic resources within the City of La Quinta
which are not Agenda items. When addressing the Historic Preservation
Commission, please state your name and address and when discussing matters
pertaining to prehistoric sites, do not disclose the exact location of the; site(s) for
their protection.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the regular Minutes for the meeting of October 19, 2000.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Phase II Archaeological Testino And Site Evaluation Report For Parcel Mao
26860: located at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Miles
Avenue.
Applicant: City of La Quinta
Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love)
001
B. Cew ftl_ica�of Appropriateness 2000-0071 request for restoration of a historic
commercial building; located at the southwest corner of Calle Tampico and
Eisenhower Drive (51001 Eisenhower Drive).
Applicants: Bruce and Jim Cathcart (La Quinta Palms Realty)
C. Certificate of Appropriateness 2000-005 (Revision): request to allow a wood
patio cover on front of restaurant; located at 78-039 Calle Estado.
Applicants: David and Alma Cetina (El Ranchito Restaurant)
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
VIIl. ADJOURNMENT
00c.4.
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
October 19, 2000
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman
Robert Wright at 3:02 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call.
A. Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call:
Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Puente, Sharp, and
Chairman Wright.
Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, and Secretary
Carolyn Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Sharp to approve
the Minutes of September 21, 2000 as submitted. Unanimously
approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Phase I Historic/Archaeological Resources Survey for Specific Plan 2000-
0-5-0: located northeast of the intersection of Eisenhower Drive and Calle
Tampico. Applicant: Santa Rosa Plaza, Inc. (Bison Hotel Group, LLC. -
Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love)
1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the staff report, a
copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
P:\CAROLYN\HPC 10-19-OO.wpd -1- 0
0 3
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
2. Commissioner Irwin commented the Commission had developed a
certain set of standards for monitoring concerning the grading and
trenching. She had some questions as to the definition of
trenching versus grading and the depths involved for each.
3. Planning Manager di lorio explained each project was analyzed on
a case -by -case basis and generally the recommendations of the
archaeologist were followed based upon what the field survey
uncovered or if there was archaeological sensitivity in the
surrounding areas. The Commission has been asking that 1Chere be
monitoring during trenching which has been done in other areas in
the Cove.
4. Commissioner Irwin asked if trenching was specified and if the site
included a mound, outside of the trenching area, what procedures
would be followed?
5. Planning Manager di lorio replied that would be up to the
archaeologist since topography of the site is also important.
6. Commissioner Irwin also added the site was a former landing strip,
and there was too much clay to grow anything. The
recommendation stated monitoring during earth moving activities
and she wondered if it would be better to use the word
"trenching".
7. Planning Manager di lorio clarified the need for monitoring given
what was observed, namely the topography and artifacts on
record for the site, plus research done by the archaeologist. The
recommendation for this project was if something was uncovered
during the grading an archaeologist would be called to the site.
8. Commissioner Sharp asked that a definition of "trenching" be
provided.
9. Planning Manager di lorio suggested it may not be necessary to
define grading, because trenching refers to the areas being dug
for pipes or irrigation systems.
P:\CAROLYN\HPC 10-19-OO.wpd -2-
i4.. OO41
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
10. Chairman Wright commented he felt it was better to look at each
project on a case -by -case basis, adding specific conditions for
each project.
1 1 . Commissioner Irwin said she preferred monitoring during the earth -
moving activities with the option to be more specific if necessary.
She stated the Commission has been trying to set up some
standards for monitoring of sites.
12. Commissioner Sharp asked if there was going to be subterranean
sites on the project; such as a swimming pool, and how would
that affect the monitoring requirements.
13. Planning Manager di lorio answered there was no proposed
subterranean parking at this time, but there were plans for a hotel
pool, appropriate to the size of the development.
14. Planning Manager di lorio added there would also be a
subterranean tennis court and wanted to clarify if the Commission
wanted monitoring just for grading of the tennis court, or for
anything that went below a certain level.
15. Chairman Wright asked what the standards were for other CLG
cities such as Pasadena.
16. Planning Manager di lorio was only able to define what was done
in San Juan Capistrano, where she formerly worked. In that City
they defined the depth based upon the archaeologist's
recommendation and the sensitivity of the site and did define
trenching as anything 18 inches below the surface.
17. Commissioner Mitchell remarked the difference between drenching
and grading was whether it was done with a backhoe or a scraper.
If it was a significant sample of the site you can look at the
sidewalls, see a profile of the stratigraphy which may suffice. He
thought it best to monitor the site because you have a good idea
of the geologic and the cultural profiling caused by the trenching
and then go from there. If it's negative in terms of trenching, he
would not recommend any more grading, but it was a judgement
call according to the recommendations of the archaeologist.
P:\CAROLrn\HPC to- 19-OO.wpd -3-
.. 005
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
18. Chairman Wright asked Commissioner Irwin if she had any history
of the site which would require the Commission to be more
specific.
19. Commissioner Irwin replied she didn't have any specifics only that
she would like to have the site monitored if trenching was to go
beyond two feet.
20. Commissioner Mitchell interjected it may be advantageous to have
an archaeologist with a geology background since he could see if
the strata pre -dates any existence of man at the site. That might
be one idea because unless you were looking for paleontology
findings there would be no sense in an archaeologist being there.
The backhoe trenching would give an idea if they need to come
back with another recommendation in terms of how old the soil
area is and if there was any possibility of human occupation
occurring in these particular stratas.
21. Planning Manager di lorio explained in some respects this process
would be a Phase II testing because you're doing a backhoe trench
as far as a Phase II would be concerned.
22. Commissioner Irwin observed at one time or another most areas
of the Cove have been farmed and asked how far down a tractor's
disc would have gone.
23. Commissioner Mitchell commented farming should not have that
much of an impact to the soil since it only goes to a depth of four
to ten inches and that same soil is being turned over and over. So
it should not have a negative affect in terms of the provenience of
artifacts as it doesn't necessarily move them off site or destroy
them completely.
24. Commissioner Irwin thought there was a possibility the artifacts
could be deeper if this was a former lake site.
25. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the Commission request a
couple of test units be done.
P:\CAR0LYN\HPC10-19-00.wpd -4-
006
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
26. Chairman Wright commented that might be less expensive and
better for the developer instead of requiring an archaeologist on
site for monitoring every bit of grading since it should be
extensive.
27. Commissioner Irwin commented this project was important as we
should begin to get more requests from developers in this same
area.
28. Commissioner Sharp said he thought there should be testing done
where the swimming pool and tennis court are to be constructed.
29. Commissioner Irwin expressed her concern that this area could be
very rich in artifacts and guidelines, or standards, should be in
place for this and all future projects in the area.
30. Commissioner Mitchell reiterated test holes could be dug and an
assessment made at that point.
31, Chairman Wright agreed the Commission wants to be thorough,
but not at the price of losing all new development.
32. Planning Manager di lorio confirmed the recommendation was to
provide a test excavation and asked if the Commission wanted a
specific number, or leave the decision to the archeologist.
Unanimous consent of the Commissioners was to let the
archaeologist decide.
33. Commissioner Puente asked for clarification on developers'
standards.
34, Commissioner Irwin replied the Commission had already been
requiring developers to monitor, but the current discussion was
about what the Commission's expectations for the future were, as
far as standards or guidelines are concerned.
35. Chairman Wright asked if the Commissioners wanted to add this
topic as a future agenda item.
P:\CAROLYN\HPC to- 19-00.wpd -5-
007
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
36. Planning Manager di lorio said the current procedure was to look
at each project as unique and individual because historically the
monitoring of trenching for projects in the northern part of the City
have all been negative.
37. Commissioner Irwin added we are now dealing with the Cove
which is different than northern La Quinta. An example would be
the area at Coachella Drive where artifacts were found which isn't
that far away.
38. Chairman Wright asked the Commissioners if they wanted to
continue looking at projects on a case -by -case basis or come up
with a defined set of guidelines.
39. Commissioner Mitchell felt the Commission could rely on the
professionalism of the archaeologist as well as the Commission's
recommendations If the Commission has any concern they can
recommend monitoring or testing to some level at that time.
40. Chairman Wright questioned whether the Commission should have
a standardized set of guidelines and add to them on a case -by -
case basis.
41. Commissioner Mitchell stated that would be easier.
42. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Sharp/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2000-024
recommending approval of the Phase I Historic/Archaeological
Resources Survey for Specific Plan 2000-050; located northeast
of the intersection of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico with the
following condition added:
a. The applicant shall prepare a Phase II study consisting of
test trenches as appropriate to determine if monitoring is
necessary.
Unanimously approved.
P:\CAROLPN\HPC10-19-OO.wpd -6-
M i
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
B. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation and Phase II Testing program for
Specific Plan 99-035: located generally on the north side of 54`h Avenue
between Jefferson Street and Monroe Street. Applicant: Country Club
Properties - Archaeological Consultant: McKenna et al.
1 . Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the staff report, a
copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
2. Commissioner Sharp asked how many golf courses would be
included in this project.
3. Planning Manager di lorio replied three.
4. Commissioner Sharp expressed his concern about recent
newspaper articles referring to the water table and the fact that
the area is sinking. He felt these concerns should be considered.
5. Planning Manager di lorio advised him that would be reviewed
during the EIR process under water resource analysis. Also the
Water District is given a copy of the project to comment on as
part of the review process.
6. Commissioner Mitchell asked about page 17 of Phase II, 1"
paragraph, where it mentions that some areas were not
accessible. Were these areas no longer in the area of potential
effect?
7. Planning Manager di lorio replied some were and the archaeologist
did go out and do a recent survey to determine if the building was
historic or not, and it was determined not to be.
8. Commissioner Sharp asked what made these non accessible?
9. Planning Manager di lorio replied the property owner did not
receive full ownership until June and the archaeologist was not on
site until the latter part of July or August.
10. Commissioner Mitchell complimented Jeanette McKenna (project
archaeologist) on her professional and very comprehensive reports.
He thought she had taken all the steps necessary and accepted
her recommendation.
009
P:\CAROLYN\HPC 10-19-OO.wpd -7-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
11. Commissioner Irwin commented she wanted the monitoring to
continue.
12. Commissioner Sharp added he was impressed with the report.
13. Chairman Wright commented on the thoroughness of the study
and agreed with Commissioner Irwin that monitoring was
especially important due to the fact that the site is covered with
vegetation and the report states "there could be some real finds
under some of the large vegetation". He emphasized the project
did need to be monitored.
14. Planning Manager di lorio explained the monitoring would be
included in the EIR as a Mitigation measure.
15. Commissioner Mitchell said he was concerned about the language
concerning the earthmoving activities as opposed to formal
grading and asked the general question if others had concerns in
that regard.
16. Commissioner Irwin stated the monitoring should be on the
initiation of all earthmoving activities.
17. Chairman Wright countered it should be in this area because it has
been undisturbed and undeveloped.
18. Commissioner Mitchell reaffirmed the Commissioners' wishes were
to accept the report with the proviso that the specific definition for
monitoring of all earthmoving activities be included.
19. Commissioner Sharp then asked if there had been monitoring
when PGA West was initially developed.
20. Planning Manager di lorio replied an EIR was done for PGA West
which required monitoring, so the assumption was that it was
monitored.
21. Chairman Wright commented as the City moves further east, there
are fewer large sites left that may be as potentially rich as this site
could be.
P:ACAROLYN\HPC 10-19-00.wpd -8-
010
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
October 19, 2000
22. Commissioner Irwin related this site is surrounded by areas that
have proved to be very rich. The Village area has never been
tested so it is important to do some testing because the Indians
were drawn to La Quinta because of the Cove, and the Santa Rosa
Mountains.
23. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Mitchell/Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2000-025
recommending approval of the Phase I Cultural Resources
Investigation and Phase II Testing Program for Specific Plan 99-
035; located generally on the north side of 54`h Avenue between
Jefferson Street and Monroe Street with emphasis on continuance
of monitoring. Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
A. Commissioner Irwin reminded the Commissioners of the May conference
in Barstow.
B. Commissioner Puente asked for an updated list of the Commissioners.
She then went on to share her recent experience in Spain and her visit
to the Guggenheim in Bilbao.
Vill. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners
Irwin/Sharp to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to a
specially scheduled meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on November 9,
2000. This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:44,
October 19, 2000. Unanimously approved.
Submitted by:
Carolyn Walker
Secretary
PACAR0LYN\HPC10-19-00.wpd -9-
DATE:
ITEM:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT:
BACKGROUND:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 9, 2000
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AND SITE
EVALUATION REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 26860
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND
MILES AVENUE
CITY OF LA QUINTA
CRM TECH (BRUCE LOVE, PRINCIPAL)
In anticipation of the future sale of city owned property and subsequent development,
cultural resource evaluation of the 54+ acre parcel is occurring. A Phase I
archaeological assessment completed by Archaeological Assessment Group was
reviewed and accepted by the Historic Preservation Commission on August 19, 1999.
The sites (CA-RIV-6275„ CA-RIV-6276, AND CA-RIV-6277) were deemed to require
further testing.
CRM TECH has completed a Phase II archaeological testing and site evaluation of the
sites and balance of the study area.
DISCUSSION:
CRM TECH conducted the archaeological testing and evaluation program and found
that CA-RIV-6276, which was previously determined not to meet the California
Environmental Quality Act's (CEQA) definition of a "historical resource", was no longer
in existence. This study also identified and recorded a new site on the property, CA-
RIV-6483. This site, as a result of this study, was also determined not to meet
CEQA's definition of a "historical resource". The study also determined that sites CA-
RIV-6275 and CA-RIV-6277 are actually one larger site which has now been
designated CA-RIV-6484. Except for a cremation site found in this larger site which
requires proper mitigation of project impacts, the balance of the site was determined
not to meet CEQA's definition of a "historical resource".
The report includes a research design upon which the study was based. The work
included a surface survey, field mapping, surface collection, surface scrapes, test
s:\stan\hpc rpt pm 26860 ph Il.wpd " - 012
units, and backhoe trenching based on Archaeological Advisory Group's Phase I
recommendations.
The significant find was the human cremation encountered on the surface; in the
northeast quadrant of CA-RIV-6484. Upon the recommendation of the Torres Martinez
Band of Desert Cahuilla Indians, the remains were excavated and will be re -interned
later at an agreed upon location.
A total of over 6,000 artifacts were recovered during the Phase II program. 5,030
pieces, or 84%, were bone or bone fragments. A large amount of these were burned
and are likely human cremation remains. As noted on Page 19 of the report, the
balance of the artifacts consisted of chipped stone, ceramic sherds, groundstone, shell
beads, shell fragments, fire -affected and non fire -affected rock and clay. Two of the
chipped stones were projectile points.
The conclusion of the study is that potential historical resources have been properly
identified and evaluated, and that all necessary archaeological field procedures
associated with the testing and evaluation program and mitigation of the cremation
site have been completed. Therefore, the City of La Quinta may reach a "No Effect"
finding on historical resources upon submission and processing of a development
project on the subject property.
Due to the high sensitivity for buried cultural deposits, archaeological monitoring is
recommended during grading and other earth moving activities. Collected cultural
resources, other than those associated with the cremation site will be delivered to the
City of La Quinta for curation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2000- , accepting:
1. The archaeological testing and site evaluation report titled, "Final Report
Archaeological Testing and Site Evaluation on Parcel Map 26860", as prepared
by CRM TECH, subject to a final report on the monitoring be submitted to the
City.
Attachment:
1 . Confidential Archaeological Testing and Site Evaluation Report on Parcel Map
26860 (Commissioners only)
Prepared by: Submitted By:
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Christine di lorio, Planning Manager
s:\stan\hpc rpt pm 26860 ph ILwpd ., 013
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 2000
ITEM: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2000-007
REQUEST: RESTORATION OF A HISTORIC COMMERCIAL BUILDING
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND
EISENHOWER DRIVE (51001 EISENHOWER DRIVE)
APPLICANTS: BRUCE AND JIM CATHCART (LA QUINTA PALMS REALTY)
BACKGROUND:
The identified historic structure was originally constructed as a residential "casitas" in
1938 and converted to a real estate sales office in the early 1970's. The building is
a one story stucco clad Spanish Colonial Revival style structure featuring a side gabled,
low pitch tile roof. The roof extends out over the front of the building creating a
covered porch. A southwest style addition has been added at the back of the building.
The building has been maintained over the years, with work including a new the roof,
which has modified the original appearance of the building.
The applicants have applied for a Commercial Property Improvement Program (CPIP)
grant to help pay for the proposed improvements. Their application for the grant is
presently being processed through the Architectural and Landscaping Review
Committee.
PROPOSED REVISIONS:
The applicants are proposing to restore the building thereby enhancing its architectural
integrity (Attachment 1). This includes re -stuccoing the exterior walls with a white
smooth trowel "California Mission" finish, replacing the concrete tile roof with a
mudded two piece clay tile roof, repainting the light colored wood trim dark brown,
replacing three porch posts, restoring the painted door to its original finish, and
refinishing the wood frame windows with a dark brown finish. The painted concrete
patio entry will be covered with sautillo tiles.
In the front yard the existing freestanding wood sign and railroad tie planters will be
removed and replaced with an integrated masonry monument sign and planter. The
sign and short planter will be finished with the building stucco finish and capped with
red brick. The remaining railroad tie planters in the yard will be replaced with matching
short walls.
014
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 cathcart.wpd
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, the request can be approved if, and
only if it is determined:
1 . That the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely
affect any architectural or landscape improvement.
RESPONSE: The proposed design modifications are in keeping with the
architectural character of the original features of the building. The
proposed freestanding masonry sign will replace a modern
freestanding wood sign near the northeast corner of the lot facing
Eisenhower Drive. Under Chapter 9.160 (Signs) of the Municipal
Code, because this business does not have at least 200 feet of
street frontage on Eisenhower Drive it is not allowed a
freestanding sign. The building was constructed as a residence
and, as such, was not designed to accommodate a building sign.
Municipal Code Section 9.65.030 (Commercial Village District)
allows City identified historic structures to deviate from Chapter
9.160 sign requirements as a part of the Certificate of
Appropriateness process. The design of the proposed masonry
sign conforms to the architecture of the building and will maintain
the architectural integrity of the building with a building mounted
sign.
2. If the owner of the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such
property cannot be economically used and denial of a permit would deprive the
owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City Council
may issue the permit with an effective date 180 days from the issuance of the
permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed
in the permit application, such as acquisition of the site improvement by the
City or a public interest group.
RESPONSE: The proposed revisions to the building are in keeping with the
character defining features of the building and be beneficial to the
property owner as well as the City.
3. In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the
exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of existing historically designated improvements
on said site.
RESPONSE: No new construction is proposed to the existing building.
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 cathcart.wpd
015
4, That the applicant has presented clear and convincing evidence of facts
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City Council that such disapproval will
impose immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of
conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be
property owner, tenant, or resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the
particular improvement, or other feature involved, and that approval of the
application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures.
RESPONSE: The applicant has shown that the revision to the building will
improve the appearance of the building, and the applicant has
shown a desire to retain the architectural integrity of the structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2000-_, recommending approval of the requested revision to
the building.
Attachment:
1 . Proposed plan exhibits
Prepared by:
Sko-, 6 . -SAWA
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted by:
Christine di lorio, Planning Manager
016
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca 2000-007 cathcart.wpd
ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The goal of this project is to restore the building located at 51-001
Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta, CA. to its original, historic colors, textures and roof
design, and to replace the existing sign and railroad tie planters with a more
traditional style masonry monument sign and masonry garden walls capped with
red brick.
To restore the exterior of the building to its original "texture" will require
the entire exterior of the building be re -stuccoed with a white, smooth California
Mission finish. The existing concrete tile roof will be replaced with an historic La
Quinta Mission 2 piece / mortar roof and the existing wood trim will be repainted
from its current light beige to a rich dark brown. Prior to painting, three large
posts will be replaced and the original plank wood door will be "restored" by
sanding, patching and filling, and refinishing. Additionally, the original single pane
wood framed windows will be "restored" by sanding, patching and filling, reglazing,
and refinishing with a dark brown finish. Finally, the covered entry (patio) floor,
currently just painted concrete, will be covered in super Sautillo tiles.
The existing sign and railroad tie planters will be removed. A new masonry
monument sign and masonry wall planter, though slightly smaller, will be
reinstalled in the same location as the original sign. Both the sign and planter will
be finished with the white, smooth Mission finish and capped with red brick. The
remaining railroad ties currently used as planters and borders will also be replaced
with matching white, masonry garden walls also capped with red bricks and the
northern most planter will be similarly bordered.
- 017
0
GQ:
CI
-1
f
J
a
".r
Q
'IN
ect
V/- Ar,
31
k4
is
O
bo
CITY OF LA QUINTA
in 14`
Existing building to beP1.
re -textured with white,
smooth mission finished I' _ r
stucco walls
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of white,
smooth mission finished
stucco walls
Mk
xa
M:
��
in
r.^T�a
�Yt
ff"I 020
Existing building with
modern concrete tile roof
and light colored wood
trim
La Quinta Hotel —
Example of original
historic Mission La
Quinta two piece mortar
roof and dark brown
wood trim to replace
existing roof and trim
color
021
DATE:
ITEM:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
APPLICANTS:
BACKGROUND:
Request for Revision:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 9, 2000
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2000-005
(REVISION)
REQUEST TO ALLOW A WOOD PATIO COVER ON FRONT
OF RESTAURANT
78039 CALLE ESTADO
EL RANCHITO RESTAURANT (DAVID AND ALMA CETINA)
The applicants are requesting a revision to the previously approved patio design for the
front of the El Ranchito restaurant. The previous design was reviewed by the HPC at
its meeting of September 21, 2000, and approved by the City Council on October 3,
2000. After the approval the applicant applied for a Commercial Property
Improvement Program (CPIP) grant to help pay for the improvements. The
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC), on October 4, and 18,
2000, reviewed the grant request to determine funding eligibility as required by the
program (Attachment 1).
Building Description•
The entire building is being utilized as a restaurant, but in the past has been used for
various commercial businesses. The one story building has painted brick walls, with
a low pitched gable and shed roof covered with red clay tile. Across the east half of
the front of the building is a canvas awning patio cover and short steel picket fence
that was installed approximately two years ago.
PROPOSED ADDITION:
The applicant has revised his proposal to include two horizontal freestanding wood
trellis patio covers separated by the entry door into the restaurant (Attachment 3).
The short slumpblock/ scalloped iron railing wall enclosing the outdoor area remains.
Previously, the westerly trellis followed the slope of the shed roof behind it. The
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca2000-005 rev N2 el ranchito.wpd 022
revision includes constructing this trellis horizontally at the same height as the easterly
trellis. Rather than 12" by 12" plastered columns, the proposed cover would be
supported by 8" by 8" wood posts mounted in the slumpstone columns of the short
wall enclosing the front patio.
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 7.08.030, the request can be approved if, and
only if, it is determined:
1. That the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely
affect any architectural or landscape improvement.
2. If the owner of the designated historic site or landmark demonstrates that such
property cannot be economically used and denial of a permit would deprive the
owner of all or most of his economic interest in the property, the City Council
may issue the permit with an effective date 180 days from the issuance of the
permit to allow time for the investigation of alternatives to the work proposed
in the permit application, such as acquisition of site improvement by the City or
a public interest group.
3. In the case of construction of a new improvement upon a historic site, that the
exterior of such improvement will not adversely affect and will be compatible
with the external appearance of existing historically designated improvements
on said site.
4. That the applicant has presented clear and convincing evidence of facts
demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City Council that such disapproval will
impose immediate and substantial hardship on the applicant because of
conditions peculiar to the person seeking to carry out the work, whether this be
property owner, tenant, or resident, or because of conditions peculiar to the
particular improvement, or other feature involved, and that approval of the
application will be consistent with the purposes of the permit procedures.
RESPONSE: With the revised trellis the findings needed to be made can be met. The
use of two trellis' is compatible with the existing building and minimizes
the impact on the facade while providing the protection the applicant
desires. The use of two trellis' lightens the appearance of the trellis.
The proposed addition as redesigned complies with the recommended
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties. The character -defining features of the historic building are not
obscured with the size and scale of the revised design.
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca2000-005 rev #2 el ranchito.wpd
» 023
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2000-_, recommending approval of the requested addition to
the restaurant, subject to the following conditions:
1. Accurate, scaled drawings of the proposed construction, with color and material
samples shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for
approval prior to %ssuance of a building permit.
2. The column material and finish shall match as closely as possible that used on
the building.
3. The westerly trellis shall be horizontal, rather than sloped.
4. The westerly columns shall be moved easterly away from the edge of the
building to match the distance between the edge of the building and the easterly
columns.
Attachments:
1. Minutes of October 4, and 18, Ito be available at the meeting) 2000, ALRC
meetings
2. Minutes of July 27, 2000, Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
3. Proposed revised plan exhibits
Prepared by:
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted by:
I' 1J�(�
Christine di lorio, Planning Manager
024
p:\stan\hpc rpt ca2000-005 rev #2 el ranchitompd
ATTACHMENT 1
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
6. Committee Member Reynolds stated it is a good idea as it is in a
conspicuous location in the City.
7. Committee Member Cunningham reviewed the proposed changes
Q with Mr. Cathcart, the applicant.
8. \Management Analyst Britt Wilson asked how the Committee
Members wanted to determine the scoring. Committee Member
Bof ibitt stated he would prefer an open discussion on each of the
pout;, areas.
9. Committee Member Cunningham stated they need to look at what
is viewed by the public eye. Staff stated the idea of the grant is
to see solething from the street scene. Discussion followed as
to the criteria the funds could be used for and how the applicant
would be held accountable to be sure they complete the work as
it was submitted.
10. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what the process will be once
it passes this mmittee. Staff stated it will depend upon the
applications the will need to submit for the planning approval
process. Committ a Member Bobbit stated that if the landscaping
is part of the applic nt, he would like it to come back to the ALRC.
Staff stated it wo ' ld be up to the Community Development
Department to dete ine the process after the CPIP approval.
Committee Member B bbitt stated that if the applicant wanted to
do just landscaping hich normally would not need Planning
approval, what will kee the applicant from putting something in
that was not attractive. Staff stated that if it is significant new
landscaping it will be bro ght back to the ALRC.
1 1 . There being no further disc sion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbi Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion
2000-018 recommending Vproval of Commercial Property
Improvement Program 2000 01 with a rating score of 89 and
dollar amount of $15,000. Unanimously approved.
B. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-002; a request of
David Cetina, El Ranchito Mexican Restaurant for review of a funding
request to construct a front patio cover and new concrete.
1. Management Analyst Britt Wilson presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
025
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC10-4-00.wpd 3
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
2. Committee Member Cunningham stated he approved of the
proposed work except for the plastering of the columns. He
questioned why the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC)
changed the applicant's design. Mrs. Cetina stated their original
submittal did not contain the plastering on the columns, but the
HPC requested they redesign as it is currently submitted.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt commented that the post treatment
could make the patio cover. A post surrounded by slump, or
textured the same as the wall would look better. Mr. Cetina
stated the HPC did not want an exact match because it would
then deter from the original design.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated he did not want to be in
conflict with another Commission and he will defer to their
opinion. As to their scope proposed, there is a tremendous
amount of work.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if this project is not approved
by the Community Development Department what would happen.
Management Analyst Britt Wilson stated the applicant had
previously met with staff before it was submitted to this
Commission to be sure the project conformed to City standards.
6. Committee Member Cunningham stated the Committee could
make a recommendation and the applicant can take that
recommendation back to the HPC to see if they would want to
change their decision.
7. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the grant was not involved,
would it will still have to go through the approval process. What
happens if this Committee does not agree with the HPC's
approval?
8. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the grants involving
property that is within the historical district could be processed
through the HPC and the would go through this Committee.
9. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the location of the new
sign as he did not think it could be seen at the proposed location.
10. Committee Member Cunningham stated that in regard to the
architecture, the west end of the building appears to be missing
the other half of the building. This is not architecturally complete
and nothing can be done with it. To have the sloping trellis
026
C\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC10-4-OO.wpd 4
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
accentuate this architectural problem, takes the building out of
scale and brings it closer to the curb and creates too much "stuff'.
If the trellis were straight across, it would create architectural
continuity and give balance to the front of the building. With
regard to the posts, the plan shows round post column veneers.
Mr. Centina stated it is the cap. They are square with rounded
caps. It will have a trowel finish. Committee Member
Cunningham stated that was not the same as the building because
it is not slumpstone. This adds another element to the design. It
should be a flat trellis all across the front using 8' X 13' posts
exposed with a decorative corbel on the top and have it come off
the slumpstone wall so the wall is the base of the column and the
slumpstone boxes out where it comes out and the base would be
a 36" high slumpstone column base. The object is to have a
shaded structure and not massive architecture out to the curb.
This would be a more permanent structure and attractive:.
11. Committee Member Bobbitt concurred, as long it does not
overpower. Instead of using the lattice use something heavier.
Ms. Cetina stated that in the beginning they wanted a the roof,
and the HPC wants a wood trellis with shade cloth. It is not what
they want to use. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the tile
would be difficult to make it fit in. From a patio cover look it will
look better with the heavier the wood. Using 2' X 3's they will
twist. If you use 4' X 4' with 50% coverage you would need 2-3"
spacing.
12. Committee Member Reynolds stated he agreed with what had
been stated.
13. Committee Member Cunningham asked what would happen if they
state they do not agree architecturally with the HPC
recommendation; what will the applicant have to do? Staff stated
that if the applicant requests it, the application would have to go
back to the HPC and then the City Council. Committee Member
Cunningham asked if the applicant could appeal the decision.
Staff stated no. The Committee's action is for the CPIP funding
and not for the architecture. What if the process were reversed.
If they had approved it before the HPC. This process is penalizing
the applicant. He would vote for funding, but the problem he has
is the design of the patio cover as approved by the HPC. He does
not want to vote to give City money as it is designed and does not
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC10-4-OO.wpd 5 027
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
want to have the applicant go through a hardship to go back to the
HPC/City Council. This process needs to be worked out.
Assistant City Manager Mark Weiss stated it is the applicant's
decision as to which committee/commission they go through first.
14. Committee Member Cunningham stated that when he; has to
appear before the City Council on a project and it appears it will be
denied, he will ask for a continuance to allow time to resolve the
problem. This is clearly a difference in opinion based on an
architectural standpoint. Therefore, he would like to request a
continuance. Mr. Cetina stated he had spoken with Planning
Manager di lorio and this was her recommendation to the HPC.
15. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he does not understand why it
should have to take two months to receive a simple change. Staff
stated that if their original design did not meet the Secretary of
Interior recommendations then this may be the reason for the HPC
recommendation.
16. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Cunningham/Reynolds to continue approval of
Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-001 to a special
meeting of the ALRC to give staff time to review the approval
process.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Reynolds to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and
Landscaping Review Committee to a special meeting to be held on October 18, 2000.
This meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a.m. on October 10, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
..,,. 028
C:\My Documents\WPD0CS\ALRC10-4-OO.wpd 6
0
ATTACHMENT 2
MINUTES FILE COFY
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
July 27, 2000
This meeting of the Historic Presljvation Commission was called to order by Chairman
Robert Wright at 3:04 p.m. whgllled the flag salute and asked for the roll call.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiaq.6e.
B. Roll Call.
Present: Commissioners Irwin, Puente, Mitchell, and Chairman
Wj'lght.
was moved and seconded by Commissioners
n/Mitchell to excuse Commissioner Sharp. Unanimously
roved.
Staff PresePlanning Manager Christine di lorio and Secretary
II Carolyn Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CAkENDAR:
A. Planni g Manager Christine di lorio informed the Commissioners RJT
Ho applicant for Item "C", has asked to withdraw their application
/tae
ll resubmit at a later date. They will present Phase I and III at one
It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Puente to
em #C. Unanimously approved.
B. moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to approve
nutes of June 15, 2000 as submitted. Unanimously approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Certification off Appropriateness 2000-005, a request to allow a wood
patio cover with a tile roof on the front of a restaurant located at 78-039
Calle Estado. Applicant: El Ranchito Restaurant - David and Alma Cetina.
PACAR0LYN\HPC7-27-00.wpd -1- 029
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 27, 2000
1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the staff report, a
copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
2. Chairman Wright asked if the applicant would like to address the
Commission. David Cetina, owner of the El Ranchito Restaurant,
gave a brief history of the restaurant and the improvements made
over the years. The canvas cover was erected as a temporary
patio cover; however, due to problems with the wind and high
maintenance, he wishes to put up a more permanent structure as
it is used extensively. He proposes to construct a wood beam
structure with tile.
3. Chairman Wright asked Mr. John Weidenhamer, a local artist who
was working with Mr. Cetina, for his opinion on altering the
facade of the building. Mr. Weidenhamer stated he had reviewed
the drawings and the wood beam structure would be more
attractive than the canvas as it would blend better and not block
the roof gable ends. They would still be seen above the shed roof
as well as the front of the building. Almost none of the building
would be hidden. He did not think the design changed the facade,
but was simply installing a replacement for the canvas patio cover
that was already there.
4. Commissioner Mitchell expressed his dislike of the current canvas
covering and agreed with staff's decision, based upon the
Secretary of Interior's Guidelines. He also wondered if some
compromise could be made to adequately address staff concerns
to come up with a design that satisfies both the Secretary of
Interior's Guidelines and would be cost-effective for the applicant
He wondered if there were any other design possibilities besides
the current proposed cover.
5. Mr. Cetina replied he had chosen this design because it was simple
and with the open ceiling the tile would give the cover a rustic
look.
6. Commissioner Mitchell commented that the structure was not
appropriate for the style and period in which the building was built.
He wondered if there was anything that could be done that
wouldn't impact the feeling and design and stay within the
guidelines of this structure.
P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -2- 030
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 27, 2000
7. Mr. Cetina pointed out he had chosen the wood trellis because this
would be more harmonious with this architectural style than a
stucco design.
8. Commissioner Mitchell stated it's the feeling of this structure that
is of concern to staff and asked if a historic architect had been
consulted. It was his opinion the Commission should have an
opportunity to consider other alternatives.
9. Commissioner Irwin commented that she approved of the
improvements the owner has done so far; even the temporary
canvas cover was attractive because it did add some color to the
building and was maintained well. However, the newly proposed
patio cover seemed very massive for this size building. She
thought it would be better if it wasn't a solid roof. She gave an
example of an entryway at the La Quinta Hotel. There is ten
years difference in the age of the buildings, but the many
alterations blend so well it doesn't appear as though it has been
altered at all. It maintains its integrity. Her concern vvas if a
massive roof covering was installed on this size building, it would
lose the integrity of the building. She also suggested adding some
openness.
10. Commissioner Puente agreed and stated the building has a very
simple form, similar to the Old Spanish style, and the overhang is
more like a Southwest style. It would appear as though the two
styles are trying to clash. She suggested designing something
with arches.
11. Chairman Wright expressed concern that this is a historic (building,
but this business is one of the few businesses in the Village area
that had been around for a long period of time. In his opinion the
patio was financially important to this business. He said he
realized that it was a historic structure and recalled all the time
spent on the Historical Society Museum and the Veterinary
Hospital (the old lumber yard) making sure they were refurbished
close to their original style. He asked Planning Manager di lorio
about the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines and if the patio cover
had to look exactly like the building or if it could be of a different
style.
P:\CAROLPN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -3- �•,, _ 031
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 27, 2000
12. Planning Manager di lorio replied it was not necessary to match
the historical structure. The Commission was concerned with the
addition's massiveness, scale and its architectural integrity as it
does stand on its own. One of the alternatives discussed was
possibly breaking up the massiveness by having two structures.
The goal was not trying to replicate, but to be compatible with a
contemporary look; keeping in mind the character -defining
features.
13. Chairman Wright asked if it made any difference that the canopy
was not attached to the building? Planning Manager di lorio
answered it did not. One of the initial concerns was the
structural integrity of the building and the applicant has been very
sensitive in re -designing the awning without touching the historic
building.
14. Chairman Wright said he would like to see another design other
than the canvas since it does not provide protection from the heat;
Whereas, tile, or a solid structure would provide some protection
as the patio is used year-round.
15. Commissioner Irwin disagreed, saying she has a solid roof patio
covering on her house which retains the heat, even with fans.
She maintained the addition of the patio cover would not make the
patio more useable year-round because of the intense heat in
June, July and August.
16, Chairman Wright commented that no one would be able to sit
outside during those months, but he wanted to work hard with
this business to make this thing work. He suggested the
Commission and staff provide the applicant with some additional
ideas as well as the applicant look at hiring a historic architect.
17. Planning Manager di lorio reiterated staff's position and added
there will be a funding program, starting in September for
businesses in the Village Commercial area. This would provide the
applicant with additional funds to cover the cost of hiring a
historic architect.
18. Chairman Wright asked if the applicant was aware of the program.
19. Mr. Cetina stated he had received something from the City
P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -4- 032
0 0
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 27,2000
regarding a Commercial Property Improvement Program but had
not had time to review it.
20. Planning Manager di lorio informed the applicant a presentation
would be given at City Hall that evening. She offered to provide
him with a brochure and another copy of the letter, at the end of
the meeting.
21. Chairman Wright reiterated his support for ail the commercial
businesses in the Village area that the Commission work as close
as possible to support them as the City is working very hard to
revitalize the Village. He then asked staff what the Commissions
options would be.
22. Planning Manager di lorio gave three alternatives: 1. Take action
on staff's recommendation; 2. Deny the application as submitted;
or, 3. Continue the request and ask that the applicant work with
staff to reach a solution based on the Commission's direction.
23. Chairman Wright stated he would prefer to continue the project as
he did not want to deny it.
24. Commissioner Irwin stated she didn't want to approve the
application as submitted and compromise the high standards the
Commission has worked hard to maintain. The historic
preservation of La Quinta is important and in this instance she did
not want to compromise the integrity of the building. In her
opinion the design did damage and obstruct the architectural
features of the historic structure.
25. Commissioner Mitchell agreed and stated the role of the
Commission was to assist people, but in this instance after looking
at the proposed patio cover plan he thought there could be an
alternative. The structure was built in the 30's. If it had been
constructed in 1936, what would they have built? He suggested,
the applicant use vines to soften the facade which could be
trained to cover the top. This could create a problem with
maintenance in terms of leaf droppings. He too, concurred with
continuing this item to allow the applicant to come up with some
viable alternatives.
26. Mr. Cetina told the Commission he had first considered building
stucco columns in the front and then decided it was going to be
.. 033
PACAROLYN\HPC7-27-00.wpd -5-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 27, 2000
too massive. He then considered lattice, and then metal. He then
decided on wood posts since they were a lot nicer than the canvas
and would be more compatible with the building's design style.
27. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the applicant might want to go
to some archives like the Library of the Historical Society and look
at some old pictures of buildings of the 1930's to get an idea of
what was used in that time period and would be better suited for
his use.
28. Chairman Wright asked Planning Manager di lorio if she
remembered the patio cover on the back of Tradition that was
approved by the Commission and what type of construction was
used. Planning Manager di lorio stated it was post and beam
construction. Chairman Wright asked if that was an alternative.
Planning Manager di lorio answered it was.
29. Mr. Weidenhamer asked if the current design plan utilized post and
beam construction.
30. Planning Manager di lorio replied it was, but had some tile work as
well. She then read the letter about the Commercial Improvement
Program and verified the time and date of July 27`h, at 6:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers.
31. Chairman Wright reiterated his support to maintain the integrity of
every structure by maintaining the architectural guidelines of
structures built in their time period, but recommended continuing
this project to give the applicant time to work with staff to
redesign the patio cover. He felt it was necessary to be very
sensitive due to the possibility of additions to the Historical
Society or the Veterinary Hospital. The situation would be similar
and the Commission would have some guideline to follow.
32. Commissioner Irwin suggested the applicant visit the Walter
Morgan House or the Cyrus Pierce House to see what type of
patio structures were used.
33. Planning Manager di lorio said the Cyrus Pierce House has a
different type of roof line. It has a patio with a covered area, but
is a side -facing gable so it just extends off of the gable whereas,
P:\CAROLYN\HPC7-27-OO.wpd -6-
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
July 27, 2000
the restaurant has a unique roof pitch with the front facing gable
and attached shed roof design. The Morgan House is in the back
and was a later addition in the Monterey -style.
34. Mr. Cetina asked for direction on design guidelines.
35. Chairman Wright had suggested Mr. Weidenhamer might be able
to help with the architectural designs as he was familiar with the
building's construction.
36. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the applicant look at other
Spanish -style structures, outside the Valley, to see what patio
structures could be designed that would keep the feeling,
association, and integrity of the historic structure.
37. Mr. Cetina referenced buildings he had seen in Mexico as this was
where his concept had originated from. That type of architecture
did not have anything underneath the beams. You can see the
tile. Some of the homes are that way with lattice and tile on top.
38. Chairman Wright commented that style was the trend and he liked
the look. He wasn't so concerned with the style as the problem
of protruding into the street, looking directly at the building,
having the patio cover take away from the lines architecturally.
This building is one of the only three historic commercial
structures left in the Village area. He suggested the applicant take
advantage of the meeting scheduled for that evening.
39. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to continue this item to the meeting
of September 21, 2000, to give the applicant an opportunity to
attending the Commercial Property Improvement Program meeting
and prepared revisions for the Commission. Unanimously
approved.
B. Fi Archaeological Monitoring tor I ract1 located on
the north bank of the Whitewater River Storm Channel between
Was gton Street and Adams Street. Applicant: Century Crowell
Comm ities (Sienna Del Rey) - Archaeological Consultant:
Archaeo ical Advisory Group (James Brock).
035
P:\CAROLYMHPC7-27-00.wpd -7-
CORRESPONDENCE
E.SPONDENCE
WRITTEN MA TERIAL
J036
HISTORIC PRESERVATION OMM._ SS
ROSTER
As of June 22, 2000
Barbara Irwin
44-065 Camino La Cresta
La Quinta, California 92253
(760) 360-9851 (Res)
(760) 772-1194 (Fax)
(Non -Professional)
Maria L. Puente
78-620 Forbes Circle
La Quinta, California 92253
(760) 345-4411 (Home)
(760) 772-4150 (Work)
(Professional)
Robert S. Wright
Post Office Box 1435
53-795 Eisenhower (Street address)
La Quinta, California 92253
(760) 564-0393 (Home/Work)
(760) 771-1811 (Fax)
898-7593 (Pager)
(Professional)
Mike Mitchell
38 Lucerne Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
(760) 340-3672 (Res)
(Professional)
Archie Sharp
44-030 Camino Azul
La Quinta, California 92253
(760) 772-0053
Email: asharp3842@aol.com
(Non -Professional)
Appointed:
Term:
Expires:
Appointed:
Term:
Expires:
Appointed:
Term:
Expires:
Appointed:
Term:
Expires:
Appointed:
Term:
Expires:
7-01-97
3 years
6-03-2000
7-01-97
3 years
6-30-2000
7-01-98
3 years
6-30-2001
2/l/99
3 years
6-30-2001
6/15/00
3 years
6-15-2003
La Quinta Historical Society
P O Box 1283
La Quinta CA 92253
564-1283
PACAROLYMHPC Roster.wpd
111.1 037
LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
HELD JOINTLY WITH
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
THE CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION
THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND
THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD
SEPTEMBER 26, 2000
A special joint meeting of the La Quinta City Council, Planning Commission, Architectural
and Landscaping Review Committee, Community Services Commission, Cultural Arts
Commission, Historic Preservation Commission and the Investment Advisory Board was
called to order at 4:30 p.m. by Mayor John Pena.
(l��Il>l'L�i•19,!C�il�•I�f3�113�
PRESENT: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena
PUBLIC COMMENT - None
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Mark Weiss, pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.8 concerning potential terms and conditions of acquisition
and/or disposition of real property located on the Southeast corner of Highway 111
and La Quinta Center Drive (Assessor's Parcel No. 649-030-057.) Property
Owner/Negotiator: Stamco Development Company
2. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
- Pending Litigation, City of La Quinta V. Baden, Case No. INC014012.
Council recessed to Closed Session to and until the hour of 5:00 p.m.
5:00 R.M.
The City Council meeting reconvened with no decisions being made in Closed Session
which require reporting pursuant to Section 54957.1 of the Government Code (Brown Act)
11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Pena led the audience in the pledge to the flag.
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 2
FOniklikiliLl• • ' •
PRESENT: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler and Chairman Robbins
ABSENT: None
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING COMMITTEE BOLL CALL -
PRESENT: Committee Members Bobbitt, Reynolds
ABSENT: Committee Member Cunningham
PUBLIC COMMENT - None
CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA - Confirmed
Mayor Pena welcomed all those in attendance and introduced Boy Scout Joel Kiener and
his father Col. Paul Kiener. Joel is working on a Citizenship Merit Badge, one of the
requirements to achieve the rank of Eagle Scout
STUDY SESSION
DISCUSSION OF MATTERS OF JOINT INTEREST TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE.
Mayor Peria suggested the meeting be conducted in a question and answer format
and he asked the Chairperson of the Planning Commission Steve Robbins to open
the discussions.
Chairman Robbins asked about the progress of the General Plan update.
Director of Community Development Jerry Herman reported the public hearings
should be taking place before the Planning Commission near the end of the year
2000.
Council Member Henderson inquired how long the Planning Commission would have
the General Plan documents to review prior to the first hearing. Director Herman
replied there will be a joint study session of the City Council and the Planning
Commission held prior to the first Planning Commission public hearing. He said the
documents will be available as soon as possible prior to that meeting.
Chairman Robbins commented on the cohesiveness of the current Planning
Commission and the fact they rarely disagree on basic philosophy. Mayor Pena
expressed the Council's pleasure with this situation and praised the Commission for
their cooperation and thoroughness. Council Member Sniff agreed.
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 3
Commissioner Tyler expressed his concern regarding the number of General Plan
Amendments being considered and approved by the City Council.
Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated that La Quinta, as a Charter
City, can process up to 12 General Plan Amendments per year. He reported that
this has allowed the City to implement a "fast track" program to assist in speeding
up the development process.
Council Member Henderson observed that there has not been an excessive number
of amendments when one takes into account the lengthy period of time that has
passed since the last General Plan Update. Chairman Robbins concurred and said he
feels the City should be concentrating on areas of the City that have not undergone
development or areas that may be annexed into the existing City boundaries.
Commissioner Abels said he likes receiving the Community Development monthly
report from staff and asked when the La Quinta Movie Theater is expected to open.
A discussion of the progress of the theater ensued and Council Member Henderson
shared information that she has recently received. She said one reason for the
delay in opening, has been because the developers have upgraded and reinstalled
seating and sound systems to insure the most up-to-date equipment is included in
the theater when it opens.
Commissioner Abels questioned the uses to be included at the new Point Happy
Center, stating he was surprised to read the announcement in the newspaper that a
hotel would be included. A general discussion among the members of the Council
and the Commission concluded a hotel use would have to come back before! the
Planning Commission for approval and at this juncture it may be more rumor than
fact.
Commissioner Abels also stated he had been approached by Mr. Budreau of the Cliff
House Restaurant about the need for a sidewalk or walkway on the north side of
Highway 1 1 1 between the Cliff House and the Point Happy development.
Council Member Henderson felt a walkway north of the rocky outcropping might be
a possibility, in the area that is planned for a bike path.
Chairman Robbins expressed his concerns with not providing some kind of an
access based on the public safety aspects. He felt Cal Trans or the City or County
really needed to "step up to the plate" and address this matter.
Mayor Pena responded that Cal Trans may need to close that area off somehow and
make it known that the area is prohibited to pedestrians.
040
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 4
Commissioner Abels asked the status of the KSL time-share project at Eisenhower
and Coachella Drive. Director Jerry Herman advised a completely new project will
be submitted by KSL for that property.
Commissioner Kirk requested some feed -back regarding the new process with the
ALRC and Planning Commission and if the Council thinks it is working well since the
City Council reorganized the organizational structure. Council Member Adolph
stated he has received positive feed -back from the Building Industry Association
(BIA).
Commissioner Kirk said he feels from a commissioner's standpoint it is going well
but would like to know if the Planning Commission is basically on the same track as
the City Council when it comes to policy. He cited recent sign issues and
circulation as two areas of concern.
Council Member Adolph said the City Council, on occasion, deals with other
considerations in these cases and because they do not uphold a Planning
Commission recommendation, in no way suggests there is a basic philosophical
difference between the Commission and Council. He pointed out that even the
Council agrees to disagree from time to time.
Council Member Sniff said he feels things are working out much better than in the
past.
Council Member Perkins commented he feels the Planning Commission provides the
most important input and support the City Council receives. He further stated he
sees no major problems between the Commission and Council.
Mayor Peria agreed with Commissioner Kirk that signage is an issue that needs to be
addressed and he feels lighting issues are also surfacing as a potential problem area.
Commissioner Tyler expressed real concern about the noise and light intrusion from
both the Southwest Congregational Church and the Indian Wells Tennis Stadium in
the vicinity of Washington and Fred Waring.
Architectural and Landscaping Committee Member Bill Bobbitt said he feels the
Committee is more effective when it is recognized as being comprised of
"specialists" in the areas of architecture and landscaping. He also asked to have the
opportunity to provide input on the landscape standards during the General Plan
update process. He mentioned such issues as planting the wrong plant materials,
particularly trees near pools and sidewalks. He stated the number one problem is
tree damage to hardscapes and sees the need to "nip the problem in the bud" by
approving a selection of appropriate trees and plant materials.
041
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 5
Mayor Pena commented that the landscape renderings provided by developers
present such attractive images that the type of plant material proposed, sometimes
doesn't get the consideration it deserves.
Council Member Sniff said he would like to see limits on the height of date palm
trees placed in the standards.
Council Member Henderson stated she has observed some honest dialog going on
between the members of the Planning Commission and she believes differences of
opinion are healthy. She encouraged the Commission to continue in this manner.
Commissioner Butler and Committee Member Bobbitt thanked the Community
Development staff for the thoroughness of the staff reports prepared for their
respective bodies.
Committee Member Frank Reynolds said he feels the ALRC has, for the most part,
been able to send most of the developers and applicants, who appear before them,
away from their meetings happy with the changes and suggestions made.
The Commission and Council briefly discussed a meeting scheduled by the
developers of Wallgreens. The Council and Commission agreed that the flyer
announcing both the meeting and the participation of the City and other agencies,
such as the Water District, was not appropriate since the developers didn't notify or
invite any of the parties named as participants to attend.
Council Member Sniff asked the Planning Commission for their feelings regarding
annexation of areas to the east of the present City boundaries. Commissioner Rich
Butler stated he has concerns about running out of room for Redevelopment
projects.
Commissioner Kirk outlined what he called "the larger issues", consisting of the
matters of signage, the Highway 111 development, the southeast area annexation
and density. He said he feels the General Plan Update process offers an excellent
opportunity to address these issues. He believes for the long term the General Plan
usually works but the really important issues are more short term and even when
the General Plan is updated there will still be amendments that come up. He:
recommended that the City focus on the southeast annexation area, on Highway
111, signs, and density and not spend too much time on the policy language:. He
said he is enthusiastically in favor of annexing the proposed area.
Council Member Sniff said he sees the need to address parks and recreation
requirements, density and affordable housing as top priorities.
The City Council and Planning Commission discussed the Community Park in the
north section of La Quinta and the challenges facing the City with its development.
0-142
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 6
They cited lighting, multiple uses, noise, and cost as being areas that may be
difficult to resolve.
Commissioner Tyler suggested the City Council look at the new "pocket" park being
developed by the City of Palm Desert, which he feels is very well designed with a
number of good amenities for a small park.
Commissioner Abels recommended the City work with Imperial Irrigation District to
upgrade the landscaping of their properties.
Mayor Pena questioned the Commission regarding their impressions of the Highway
1 1 1 Corridor development.
Commissioner Kirk said the General Plan update provides a wonderful opportunity
for planning of the undeveloped areas. He suggested it provides a chance to be
creative and innovative.
Council Member Sniff stated he feels long-range planning needs to be consistent
with what has been developed in other areas of the City such as the Village.
Commissioner Tyler reported he attended a meeting on Foreign Trade Zones
recently. He felt the City's Economic Development staff should be focusing some
effort in this area.
Council Member Sniff stated has been a good meeting and the minutes need to be
"fairly expansive".
Mayor Pena thanked the Commission and Committee Members and adjourned this
joint portion of the meeting at 6:05 p.m.
6:45 P.M. - Meeting Jointly with the Community Services Commission
IV. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Commissioners Bechard, Henson*, Rebich and Chairperson St. Johns
ABSENT: Davis
DISCUSSION OF MATTERS OF JOINT INTEREST TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION.
Mayor Pelia called the joint meeting with the Community Services Commission to
order at 6:50 p.m.
043
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 7
Mayor Pena announce that Commissioner Davis, who is attending the Olympics in
Sydney, Australia had been excused.
Mayor Pena asked Community Services Director Dodie Horvitz to make a briief staff
report prior to opening the meeting up to a question and answer format.
Director Horvitz recapped the Commission's notable activities including the meetings
with residents of the proposed Community Park neighborhood in North La Quinta
and their participation and support of the City Picnic.
Mayor Pena stated he feels one of the challenges for the Commission in the near
future will be the Community Park development. He mentioned the desire on the
part of the soccer enthusiasts to have the entire park dedicated as a soccer facility.
He also mentioned the lighting of the park may create some dissension.
Commissioner Rebich suggested the light level in that neighborhood is already a
serious concern and the lights at the high school are very invasive. She asked if
there was a way the City could approach the school district about shielding the
lights more effectively to alleviate some of the concerns of the residents.
*Commissioner Hanson arrived at 7:00 p.m.
Council Member Perkins agreed that shielding of the high school lights would be a
very good idea. He also questioned if the sports field lights are on all night.
Director Horvitz responded the lights are on a satellite timing device that
unfortunately malfunctions fairly regularly and the lights don't go off at all.
Commissioner Bechard suggested it would be very helpful if information about
modification of the high school lights could be available prior to the next community
meeting.
Commissioner Bechard questioned the City's future park plans. City Manager Tom
Genovese stated the City Council recently approved a Request for Proposal (RFP) to
update the parks master plan and future expansion will be a part of that planning.'
Council Member Adolph said the development of property located at Miles and
Washington is planned to include a community park.
Council Member Sniff suggested the Commission give some thought to the naming
of the Community Park and recommended it be kept simple, for example La Quinta
Community Park.
In response to Mayor Pena, Commissioner Bechard said one of the requests -the
Commission hears often from the High School age residents is for a Teen Center.
OC j
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 8
Council Member Henderson expressed the opinion that teens really do not want a
"structured" program. She said she feels they would prefer to have a place to "hang
out", but not necessarily a place to go for planned activities.
Chairperson St. John asked if the recent 'open swim" night for the teens was
successful. Director Dodie Horvitz responded that only about 20 people attended.
Commissioner Hanson asked if the City could do a survey to look at what the teens
themselves would like to have in the way of recreation programs. Council Member
Sniff said the City has done many surveys and the responses are always the same,
a Teen Center and a skateboard facility are repeatedly listed.
Council Member Henderson discussed the idea of holding a regular Friday night teen
dance at the recreation facility at Lake Cahuilla. She felt this could be combined
with an evening swim party at that location in the summer months.
Council Member Perkins commented, it has been his observation that teenagers do
not like anything that is "sponsored" by the school or the City.
Council Member Sniff asked what the plan is after the meeting in October with the
residents of the Community Park area. A general discussion took place which
covered identifying the other areas of interest for the Community Park site such as a
dog park, fire station location, playing fields and picnic areas.
Commissioner Hanson felt some emphasis should be placed on golf facilities for the
public as a part of future parks and recreation planning. Council Member Henderson
advised that staff is presently investigating the possibility of an 18-hole putting
course being located in the Village. She outlined that this would consist of putting
greens being located at the Civic Center Campus and various restaurants and
businesses in the Village to increase interest in the area and provide some diversity.
Mayor Pena thanked the Commissioners for their input and adjourned the joint
meeting with the Community Services Commission at 7:26 p.m.
7:30 P.M. - Meeting Jointly with the Cultural Arts Commission
1. DISCUSSION OF MATTERS OF JOINT INTEREST TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION.
V. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Commissioners Diamond, McMillan, Reynolds, Woodard, Chairperson
Shamis
ABSENT: None
045
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 9
Mayor Pena called the joint meeting with the Cultural Arts Commission to order at
7:30 p.m.
Chairperson Shamis stated the Commission would like to individually cover five very
important subjects and requested permission to have each member address a
particular subject with the Council. Mayor Pena suggested she might wish to begin.
Chairperson Shamis spoke regarding communications between the City Council and
Commission. She asked that the City Council meet with the Cultural Arts
Commission more frequently. She also said she would prefer to return to the seven
(7) member commission to accommodate the number of important tasks the!
Commission has. She addressed the upcoming Cultural Arts Symposium and asked
that the City Council share with the Commission their vision of what the role of the
Cultural Arts Commission should be.
Commissioner Elaine Reynolds spoke regarding the Temporary Art program. She
asked that the City Council consider paying for the installation of loaned artwork
and for the required liability insurance for temporary art pieces. She stated she has
been speaking with representatives of KSL about financing this and locating
temporary art in the median near the La Quinta resort. She also stated she has
spoken with Mr. Ed Kibbey of the BIA who said, while he does not favor this
program, he would not oppose it.
Mayor Pena asked in what capacity Commissioner Reynolds had been speaking with
these individuals. She responded she was just trying to help the City get one of the
Commission's programs accomplished.
Mayor Pena cautioned that commitments should not be made by an individual
Commissioner without the express direction of the Council and concurrence of the
other members of the Commission.
Commissioner Woodard suggested the discussion of Temporary Art should be
confined to the general subject, not to site specifics.
Council Member Perkins stated he would oppose placement of temporary art in the
medians because of safety concerns and possible driver distraction that this might
cause.
Council Member Sniff said he feels this program needs to be investigated thoroughly
by the City Attorney and if the problems can be worked out, the City Council would
then look into designating an appropriate site.
Council Member Henderson pointed out an important factor to consider is the cost
of installation of temporary art. She felt the installation required for some large
pieces of artwork, on a temporary basis, could be cost prohibitive.
046
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 10
Commissioner Denise Diamond spoke to the subject of discretionary funds for the
use of the Cultural Arts Commission. She outlined projects that could be done if the
Commission had some discretionary funds at its disposal. One such project might
be the creation of a catalog of the art collection located in City Hall. She felt a self -
guided tour with a brochure describing the pieces, their location, and a short
biography of the artist would be an excellent project.
Mayor Pena explained that, under the Government Code, only the City Council is
authorized to approve expenditures of public funds. He advised that the Council
sets aside discretionary funds each year during the budget process and should the
Commissions have a special project they would like to have funded, they may
request that the Council consider it.
Commissioner Woodard asked what happens with funds raised by a program put on
by the Cultural Arts Commission. Mayor Pena said he is not able to answer that
question at this time but he would explore it with staff.
Commissioner Leslie Mc Milian spoke regarding the need to have performing arts
events play a strong part in the City's Cultural Arts program. She indicated holidays
and the City's birthday would be perfectly suited for variety performances featuring
dancing, singing, talent shows, etc.
Council Member Adolph advised that "La Quinta On Stage" is in the process of
reorganizing with new expertise taking on leadership. He said they should be ready
to present some performances by next year.
Mayor Pena asked the Commission to present the Council with a plan for a program
of this kind.
Commissioner Stewart Woodard spoke regarding the strong influence golf has on
the City of La Quinta. He encouraged the City to look at golf courses as settings for
public arts and suggested the City prepare a self -guided tour brochure to the various
locations such as the City of Brea has done.
Commissioner Woodard suggested the City Council give the Commission some
guidelines for the type of art they feel is most appropriate for areas such as the
Civic Center campus.
Mayor Pena asked that the Commission turn this request around and that they
provide the Council with recommendations along these lines.
Council Member Sniff stated he feels the Civic Center should have art that is
"uncluttered". and reflects a historic theme as well as a desert influence.
047
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 1 t
Council Members Henderson and Perkins both expressed their convictions that the
City Council should not be giving directions that are too specific, since visual art is
not something that can be defined in that way. Council Member Perkins further
stated recommendations should be coming to the Council from the Commission, not
the other way around.
Council Member Sniff felt the Commission should not feel they are not being taken
seriously because the Council does not always agree with their recommendations.
Commissioner Diamond said she feels the Commission's role needs to be as a bridge
from the City to the Art community. She sees the Commission in a position to
nurture relationships with local artists during the planning and implementation
phases and the Council's role to make the decisions regarding final selection of Art
in Public Places.
Council Member Henderson said she feels meetings need to be productive but the
Commission should not feel pressured to accomplish too much at any given
meeting. She suggested, rather than being rushed to make decisions, the
Commission should feel free to continue a business meeting, to allow them time to
be comfortable with their recommendations.
Commissioner Woodward stated presentation of a written rationale for the
Commission's recommendations might be helpful the next time they are presented
to the City Council.
Mayor Peria thanked the Commissioners for their participation and adjourned this
portion of the joint meetings at 8:10 p.m.
8:20 P.M. - Meeting Jointly with the Historic Preservation Commission
V. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Commissioners: Irwin, Sharp, Chairperson Wright
ABSENT: Commissioners: Mitchell, Puente
1. DISCUSSION OF MATTERS OF JOINT INTEREST TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION.
Mayor Pena opened the joint session at 8:20 P.M. and suggested the members of
the Commission individually speak to any questions or concerns they might have.
Commissioner Barbara Irwin stated she is very happy with the newly approved
curation program and she suggested that the City's office trailer might be used for
this program after the construction company completes their work in the Village.
1W
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 12
Chairman Bob Wright also spoke about the curation program and described a visit by
the Commission to a facility designed for this purpose in Fort Irwin. He also stated
he feels the Commission needs to expand the cataloging of historic residences in the
Cove area.
Commissioner Irwin said she feels the "Desert Club Housing" built in the 1940's has
become historic and should be catalogued.
Council Member Sniff questioned what the Commission means by "Desert Club
Housing." Commissioner Irwin responded she wasn't able to provide specific
addresses but she was referring to the concrete block housing that was constructed
in the 40's.
Council Member Sniff stated there weren't too many of those houses and they were
scattered in different blocks, basically ending at Avenida Ensenada.
Mayor Pena said he would very much like to see an oral and/or written history
prepared on the development of the Cove area.
Commissioner Irwin reported that the Historic Preservation Commission staff reports
have a standardized format and the reports themselves are so comprehensive they
are historically significant. She thanked the staff for all their efforts.
Commissioner Sharp, in response to Council Member Henderson, said as a newly
appointed commissioner, he is very impressed with the operation of the Historic
Preservation Commission.
Council Member Perkins thanked the Commission for having the ability to involve
the City Council in the construction of the museum.
Mayor Pena thanked the Commission and adjourned this joint portion of the meeting
at 8:41 p.m.
8:45 P.M. - Meeting Jointly with the Investment Advisory Board
V. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Commissioners: Irwin, Chairperson Osborne
ABSENT: Commissioners: Olander, Mahfoud, Lewis, Moulin and Filice
DISCUSSION OF MATTERS OF JOINT INTEREST TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD.
Mayor Pena called the joint meeting with the Investment Advisory Board to order at
8:45 p.m.
0 n a
City Council Special Meeting Minutes September 26, 2000
Joint Meeting with Planning Commission, ALRC, Community Services,
Cultural Arts, Historic Preservation Commissions and Investment Advisory Board Page 13
Council Member Perkins stated his pleasure with the recommendations from the
Investment Advisory Board NAB). He said with the expertise of the members of the
IAB and the members of City staff involved in making investments he feels La
Quinta is in good financial condition.
Council Member Sniff said the Advisory Board was created as the result of an
unfortunate situation that occurred but it's establishment turned out to be of
significant benefit to the City Council.
Commissioner Irwin asked if the board is providing the Council with the product
they are looking for. Council Member Adolph responded he is very well satisfied
with the recommendations from the board and has a great deal of confidence in
their combined abilities.
Council Member Henderson thanked the board for the education they have provided
her. She said as a result of the formation of the Investment Advisory Board and
their annual reports, she feels she is much more knowledgeable in the area of
investment planning.
Chairman Osborne stated the board is planning to look seriously at the GSE question
in the upcoming months.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Council
Members Sniff/Henderson to adjourn the Joint City Council/Boards, Committees and
Commissions meeting at 8:52 p.m. The motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Jun e3: Greek, CIVIC
City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California
0510
PROCEEDINGS
OF THE
SOCIETY FOR CALIFORNIA
Volume 13
PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE
SOCIETY FOR CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY
051
0 SOCIETY FOR CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
DIGGING IN DESERT DUNE FIELDS: METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
James Brock and Brenda D. Smith
Archaeological Advisory Group
P.O. Box 491
Pioneertown, CA 92268-0491
INTRODUCTION
This paper presents the results of recent
research in the central area of the City of La
Ouinta, Riverside County, California. Specifically,
the study areas considered lie within a region that
falls on the north side of Avenue 48 between
Adams Street and Jefferson Street. This area is
one of the fastest developing regions in California.
Unfortunately, the area also has one of the
densest concentrations of precontact
archaeological sites in the state. These factors,
combined with the unique characteristics of sand
dune environments, create great challenges for
archaeologists working in the region.
This area lies within rolling, semi -stable sand
dunes containing intermittent blowouts. Native
vegetation of the study areacomprises aCreosote
Scrub community. Plants typical of this community
are creosote (Larrea tridentata), mesquite
(Prosopis glandulosa), burrobush (Ambrosia
dumosa), and dicoria pcoria canescens). This
landform comprises, and is typical of, the remnant
shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla, a large lake that
once occupied the basin to the south and east of
the area under consideration. The Salton Sea, a
much smaller body of water, now fills this basin.
Ancient Lake Cahuilla (also called Lake La Conte
or Blake's Sea), existed during periods of
inundation of the area by the Colorado River. The
rivers usual course was to flow directly into the
Gulf of California. Periodically, fluctuations in
distributary channels would create an
accumulation of sediments at the rivers mouth.
This would result in the formation of a deltaic
barrier which restricted access tothe gulf, causing
the course of the river to shift. This diversion
caused the Salton Trough, a geologic depression
that extends northward 140 miles (225 km) from
the gulf, to fill and form a fresh water lake.
Eventually, the river's course would shift back to
the gulf and desiccation of the lake would occur.
This lake probably filled and desiccated at least
five times within the last two millennia (for a
summary see Brock, Smith, and Wake 1999:7).
The final stand occurred in the 1600s.
Filling of the lake created excellent fishing
opportunities and produced a rich marshland
environment that could have been exploitedalong
with the lake and desert resources. Many useful
plants grow in this community and were used by
the Cahuilla. The marshland would have also
drawn in many birds, mammals, and reptiles. The
Cahuilla, and possibly other groups, took
advantage of these faunal resources.
211
052
The creation of sand dunes in this
environment probably relates to past climate
change and the fluctuation of Lake Cahuilla rather
than to simple aridity (Clarke and Rendell 1998).
The dunes tend to be vegetation anchored by
creosote and to a lesser degree by mesquite
thickets. Rejuvenating mesquite thickets can not
only anchor dunes, they can result in an increase
in the dunes' size over hundreds, if not
thousands, of years. Of course, dune areas with
little or no vegetation are more susceptible to
movement through aeolian processes.
PROPOSITIONS
It is proposed here that, given the uniqueness
of this ancient shoreline dune environment,
standard archaeological techniques have the
potential to produce skewed results that can
ultimately end in the loss of significant sites. In
particular it is suggested that:
Concentrating field work on surface
archaeological manifestations (e.g. placing
units based on surface scatters) can be a
misdirected effort because soil deflation in
the aeolian sand environment can result in
the destruction of stratigraphic integrity and
create a shallow artifact deposit akin to a
desert pavement.
Surface sites will generally evaluate as
non -significant for three primary reasons: (1)
the lack of stratigraphy will result in a mixing
of what may have once been temporally
discrete materials; (2) relic seekers and
aeolian processes will have removed
diagnostic artifacts fromthe surface; and (3)
they will be largely undateable because
surface charcoal will have blown away or be
contaminated.
Buried sites will be present in the aeolian
sand dune environment and they will have
the greatest research potential. What goes
up must come down. Sand accumulation
will occur in the dune environment,
particularly in regenerative vegetation
contexts (e.g. mesquite dunes) or in areas
of depressions, either natural or caused by
the decay of brush or wooden structures.
This will result in cultural deposits being
sealed and buried through time. These
deposits will have good integrity but, as
Schiffer (1996:241) points out, "_the result
is often near total loss of visibility for the
resultant sites."
SUPPORTING STUDIES
Three studies on the north side of the
Avenue 48 corridor in La Quinta present data to
support these propositions: the Burning Dune
site, the Miraflores project, and the test of APN
649-036-030.
The Burnina Dune Site (CA-RIV-4754)
The Burning Dune site (CA-RIV-4754) was
located near the intersection of Avenue 48 and
Adams Street. It was impacted by the widening of
Adams Street in 1997. Data recovery took place at
the site prior to the street project. A monograph
has been prepared on the site (Brock, Smith, and
Wake 1999) as well as a summary article (Smith and
Brock 1999).
The Burning Dune site excavationwas thefirst
study conducted that pertained to the opening of
the Avenue 48 corridor for development. The
significance of CA-RIV-4754for this paper is that it
clearly illustratedthe potentialfor buried sitesto be
present in the area. This site, which falls within a
mesquite covered dune, was characterized by a
massive layer of burnt mesquite, the top of which
ranged in depth from 70 to 150 cm below the
ground surface. Some 30 to 40 cm below this was
a large, well-preserved deposit of fish remains,
primarily comprising bonytail (Gila elegans) and
razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). The burnt
mesquite layer, which dated to about AD 1800,
was interpreted as representingCahuilla mesquite
thicket exploitation and maintenance: through
burning. The lower level dated to the early AD
1600s and was interpreted as a fishing camp, or
fish processing area, associated with the final
stand of Lake Cahuilla.
Given the considerable depth of the cultural
deposits atthe Burning Dunesite, itis unlikelythat
the site would have been discovered during the
212 053
survey phase had it not been distinctly exposed in
the escarpment of the road cut for the original
construction of Adams Street between Highway
111 and Avenue 48. The site clearly
demonstrates that the accumulation of aeolian
sands on mesquite -covered dunes can seal and
preserve archaeological deposits. Strangely,
there were a few pottery sherds on the surface of
the dune but these were underlainby 20"-century
deposits (a concrete post anchor and a layer
containing plastic shot shells) resting between the
surface and the mesquite burn layer.
Consequently, the surface sherds had to be
intrusive. The factors accounting for their
presence on the site are unclear but are possibly
related to aeolian activity.
The Miraflores Project
Investigations for the Miraflores project, a
residential housing development, were initiated by
Archaeological Advisory Group as a Phase II test
excavation of two previously identified precontact
sites, CA-RIV-6059 and CA-RIV-6060 (Brock and
Smith 1999a). Of relevance to this discussion are
the findings from CA-RIV-6059. The main
component of this site (Locus A), as recorded
during the Phase I survey, was an alkali sink area
containing "2000+" pottery sherds, hundreds of
fragments of burnt unshaped clay, and minor
quantities of other materials (Demcak 1997:19).
At first we approached the site in a traditional
manner, conducting a surface collection and
excavating test units. The excavation of four one -
by -one meter units in central portions of dense
Locus A surface scatter indicated that the deposit
was completely deflated —no artifacts were
recovered below 2 cm. The specimens recovered
from the surface scatter were fragmentary and
almost totally undiagnostic.
The northern area of this site (Locus B), which
had only 20 surface specimens, had a single one -
by -one meter unit excavated in it. This unit was
dug to 30 cm and postholed to 100 cm. It
produced one sherd and two clay fragments from
the top 10 cm.
The findings from CA-RIV-6059 seemed to
indicate the site had little research potential.
However, given our recent experience at the
Burning Dune site, we decided that some sort of
deep testing needed to be conducted to ensure
that major buried sites would not be impacted by
the proposed project. We chose to use a backhoe
to dig trenchesto minimally 2 meters in depth at 50
meter intervals in a grid over all accessible areas of
the 35.9-acre property. All backhoe soil was
screened using one -quarter inch mesh on a sled -
mounted screen apparatus.
Starting at the northeast corner of the
property, the firsttrench of 39 dug encountered a
major buried deposit in the Locus B area of CA-
RIV-6059 not far from where we had excavated a
test unit. Further trenching established the
perimeter of the deposit and hand excavation
established the nature of the deposit. The dense
cultural deposit, which falls within a depression
surrounded by mesquite dunes, ranges in depth
from 50 to over 200 centimeters. The site is multi -
component, is in an excellent state of
preservation, and has afull spectrum of cultural
materials. Radiocarbon dates indicate occupation
ranging from approximately AD 1300 to 1700.
Given the obvious research potential of the site,
we negotiated with the developer (Catellus
Residential Group), the City of La Ouinta, and our
Cahuilla consultant (Anthony Andreas) and
mutually agreed to preserve the 0.6-acre site as an
open space area (grass covered park).
213
Had it not been for the backhoe testing this
deposit would not have been encountered until
grading had commenced and the chances for its
preservation would have been negligible. No
other buried sites were encountered on the
project during the backhoe testing and no sites
were discovered during monitoring in the areas
that had been tested by backhoe.
The Test of APN 649-036-030
Another property along the Avenue 48
corridor that is proposed for development Is the
50-acre APN 649-036-030. This property hod
three precontact sites previously recorded on It
,b.. 054
(Everson 1992), one of which was the previously
discussed Burning Dune site (CA-RIV-4754). A
test program needed to evaluate the other two
sites (CA-RIV-4746 and CA-RIV-4753) and
address the potential for asyet unidentified buried
sites to be present.
As the first step of the test program a 50-meter
interval grid was established over the entire
property. Systematic backhoe trenching to a
minimum depth of two meters was conducted over
the entire 50-meter grid Brock and Smith 1999b).
Again, the sandy soil was screened through one -
quarter inch mesh. Seventy two trenches were
excavated over the 50-meter grid with an
additional 26 trenches dug to better define
deposits or to further investigate suspicious areas
(e.g. mesquite thickets).
No new sites were discovered by the backhoe
trenching, but the extent of CA-RIV-4746 was
significantly revised as a result to the testing. This
site had been initially recorded based on its
surface materials which generally appeared in
blown out areas in the central southwestern part of
the property. Thirty-three blow outs were
recorded. These generally contained fragmentary
thermally affected rock, fragmentary unmodified
rock, bone fragments, and an occasional pottery
sherd or baked clay fragment. The backhoe
testing indicated that their was a subsurface
component to the sites that extended some 40
meters to the south of the blow out areas. The
backhoe trenching, along with hand excavation,
further indicated that cultural material in the area of
the blow outs had little or no depth, with the blow
outs representing areas of deflated soil. This
excavation further proved that CA-RIV-4746 had a
buried component to the south of the previously
recorded site area. This area had no surface
artifacts or ecofacts. This component extended to
a depth of at least 1.5 meters and contained
evidence of light sporadic subsistence activities
that took place over a period possibly extending
from AD 880 to 1425, according to three
radiocarbon dates.
The investigations at APN 649-036-039
showed, once again, that surface materials are not
indicative of subsurface deposits and that
subsurface deposits do not necessarily have
surface indicators. Furthermore, because most of
the test trenching was negative, grading of the
property can be approached with greater
confidence that buried sites will not make surprise
appearances.
CONCLUSIONS
Surface dune deposits, while appearing to
have potential, are often the result of soil deflation
processes and may have little research value due
to lack of stratigraphy and the absence of
diagnostic artifacts and dateable material.
Given the nature of the aeolian dune
environment, the potential for buried
archaeological deposits is high. In contrast to
surface deposits, buried sites have the greatest
research potential because: their stratigraphic
integrity is generally intact; carbon .and other
dateable material will be present; and, because the
sites have not been picked over by relic seekers
and impacted by aeolian action, a full range of the
site's artifacts will be present.
Traditional hand excavation techniques,
focusing on surface deposits, might: produce
skewed results. The only way to objectively locate
potentially significant buried sites prior to grading
monitoring is through systematic, deep test
excavation.
We believe that, given the pace of site
destruction by development today, the "prime
directive" of archaeology should be the
preservation of potentially significant sites. The
key to site preservation is to identify sites as early
in the planning process as possible, preferably
before any development plan is laid out. The
preservation of sites should be an element of the
development plan. If site identification is leftto the
monitoring phase the potential for preserving
discovered sites is virtually nil. A developer would
much rather "throw money" at a last minute data
recovery program than reformulate their set -in -
stone development plans.
We have offered here a possible solution for
identifying and preserving potentially significant
214 D 'l 0
sites in the aeolian sand dune environment of the
California desert.
REFERENCES CITED
Brock, James, and Brenda D. Smith
1999a Archaeology of the Miraflores Project, La
Quinta, California. Ms. on file, Eastern
Information Center, California Historical
Resources Information System, UC Riverside.
1999b Phase II Test Excavation for APN 649-036-
030, Northeast Corner of Avenue 48 and Adams
Street, La Quinta, California. Ms. on file, Eastern
Information Center, California Historical
Resources Information System, UC Riverside.
Brock, James, Brenda D. Smith, and Thomas A. Wake
1999 Investigations at the Burning Dune Site (CA-
RIV-4754), La Quints, California. AAG
Monograph 1. Archaeological Advisory Group,
Pioneertown, California.
Clarke, M.L., and H.M. Pendell
1998 Climate Change Impacts on Sand Supply and
the Formation of Desert Sand Dunes in the
Southwest USA. Journal of Arid Environments
39:517.531.
Demcak, Carol R.
1997 Archaeological Assessment of a 40-Acre Parcel
in La Quinta (La Quinta Quad), Riverside
County, California. Ms. on file, Eastern
Information Center, California Historical
Resources Information System, UC Riverside.
Everson, Dicken
1992 Cultural Resources Assessment: La Quinta
Center, City of La Quints, Coachella Valley,
Riverside County, California. Ms. on file,
Eastern Information Center, California Historical
Resources Information System, UC Riverside.
Schiffer, Michael B.
1996 Formation Processes of the Archaeological
Record. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake
City.
Smith, Brenda D., and James Brock
1999 From Shoreline to Mesquite Dune: Changing
Subsistence Strategies at CA-RIV-4754, La
Quinta. Proceedings of the Society for
California Archaeology 12:1-5.
215
056
CA®RIV=4746
0 Meters 50
EXTENT OF SITE BASED
—
ON SURFACE EVIDENCE
7
r +Unit
2 xioeexo+
\� Unit 3
\ A
�
\
r
ff
Unit 11
Unit 15 .
Unit 12.
Unit 14
wweroe rwar+�s\
+ +\
Unit 5 woeauo +
Unit 1
�ssv
If.Unit 4
Unit 13
l
Unit 10
, Unit 8 /
N"100+ + Unit 7 + . Unit 6 /"'��00. Unit a
EXTENT OF SITE BASED Unit 16
ON BACKHOE TRENCHES
AND UNITS
Figure 1. Contrast between surface and subsurface manifestations of CA-RIV-4746.
216
057
DRAFT
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
October 4, 2000
CALL TO ORDER
10r00 a.m.
A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called
to order at 10:00 a.m. by Principal Planner Stan Sawa who led the flag
salute.
B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham, and Frank
Reynolds.
C. Staff present: Assistant City Manager Mark Weiss, Management: Analyst
Britt Wilson, Principal Planner Stan Sawa and Executive Secretary Betty
Sawyer.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Principal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the
Minutes of September 13, 2000. There being no corrections, it was
moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to
approve the minutes as submitted.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-001; a request of
Bruce Cathcart and Jim Cathcart, La Quinta Palms Realty for review of
a funding request to restore the existing wall texture, roof, wood trim,
planters and patio entrance.
1. Management Analyst Britt Wilson presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
058
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCIO-4-OO.wpd
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
2. Committee Member Cunningham confirmed the grant was for up
to $15,000 and that this project will cost more than that figure.
Mr. Cathcart stated that was correct. Committee Member
Cunningham stated this was a step in the right direction
considering we have our historical look being the La Quinta Hotel
and this building is a good representation even in its existing
condition. With the proposed improvements it will bring it even
more into conformance with the look of of the Hotel.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if Community Development
Department had reviewed the plans and what was the process in
regard to the approvals. Staff stated the project is submitted to
this Committee for approval of the funding and then it will go
through the normal processing procedure. Committee Member
Bobbitt stated his only concerns are to see that it will be approved
by staff. He enjoys the downtown look and this building is
attractive and with the mud tile it will only enhance the look. This
is the look he would like to see more of in the Village. The other
buildings downtown are not this style. He asked staff if they will
be encourage to change their facade. Management Analyst Britt
Wilson stated that in relation to the CPIP, when the Agency Board
adopted it they wanted it to be consistent with the Village
Guidelines. If the project does not conform to the Guidelines, it
might not score as high.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated that In this case the
project will cost more than the grant and as the applicant is
matching the funds, it is good business.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked how the City determines what
percentage of the amount requested, the applicant will receive.
Staff stated the applicant is required to do a 10% match and the
City will go up to $15,000. This is a rebate program. The
applicant receives the money after the work is completed.
Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern that an applicant
could submit an inflated bid to get the extra money. Staff stated
it is a rebate program and they must show clear evidence that the
money was spent. The process runs so that the applicant can
receive an approval on the grant and then go through the City's
permit process to do the work. Staff is requesting this Committee
to score the project and make a recommendation as to the amount
that should be granted. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that
without a full set of plans it is hard to determine what the
applicant is doing.
G 5 ;4
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC 10-4-OO.wpd 2
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
6. Committee Member Reynolds stated it is a good idea as it is in a
conspicuous location in the City.
7. Committee Member Cunningham reviewed the proposed changes
with Mr. Cathcart, the applicant.
8. Management Analyst Britt Wilson asked how the Committee
Members wanted to determine the scoring. Committee Member
Bobbitt stated he would prefer an open discussion on each of the
point areas.
9. Committee Member Cunningham stated they need to look at what
is viewed by the public eye. Staff stated the idea of the grant is
to see something from the street scene. Discussion followed as
to the criteria the funds could be used for and how the applicant
would be held accountable to be sure they complete the work as
it was submitted.
10. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what the process will be once
it passes this Committee. Staff stated it will depend upon the
applications they will need to submit for the planning approval
process. Committee Member Bobbit stated that if the landscaping
is part of the applicant, he would like it to come back to the ALRC.
Staff stated it would be up to the Community Development
Department to determine the process after the CPIP approval.
Committee Member Bobbitt stated that if the applicant wanted to
do just landscaping which normally would not need Planning
approval, what will keep the applicant from putting something in
that was not attractive. Staff stated that if it is significant new
landscaping it will be brought back to the ALRC.
1 1 . There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt Minute; Motion
2000-018 recommending approval of Commercial Property
Improvement Program 2000-001 with a rating score of 89 and
dollar amount of $15,OOO. Unanimously approved.
B. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-002; a request of
David Cetina, El Ranchito Mexican Restaurant for review of a funding
request to construct a front patio cover and new concrete.
1. Management Analyst Britt Wilson presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
asp
C:AMy Documents\WPDOCSVALRCIO-4-OO.wpd 3
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
2. Committee Member Cunningham stated he approved of the
proposed work except for the plastering of the columns. He
questioned why the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC)
changed the applicant's design. Mrs. Cetina stated their original
submittal did not contain the plastering on the columns, but the
HPC requested they redesign as it is currently submitted.
3. Committee Member Bobbitt commented that the post treatment
could make the patio cover. A post surrounded by slump, or
textured the same as the wall would look better. Mr. Cetina
stated the HPC did not want an exact match because it would
then deter from the original design.
4. Committee Member Cunningham stated he did not want to be in
conflict with another Commission and he will defer to their
opinion. As to their scope proposed, there is a tremendous
amount of work.
5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if this project is not approved
by the Community Development Department what would happen.
Management Analyst Britt Wilson stated the applicant had
previously met with staff before it was submitted to this
Commission to be sure the project conformed to City standards.
6. Committee Member Cunningham stated the Committee could
make a recommendation and the applicant can take that
recommendation back to the HPC to see if they would want to
change their decision.
7. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the grant was not involved,
would it will still have to go through the approval process. What
happens if this Committee does not agree with the; HPC's
approval?
8. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the grants involving
property that is within the historical district could be processed
through the HPC and the would go through this Committee.
9. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the location of the new
sign as he did not think it could be seen at the proposed location.
10. Committee Member Cunningham stated that in regard to the
architecture, the west end of the building appears to be missing
the other half of the building. This is not architecturally complete
and nothing can be done with it. To have the sloping trellis
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC10-4-OO.wpd 4 061
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
accentuate this architectural problem, takes the building out of
scale and brings it closer to the curb and creates too much "stuff".
If the trellis were straight across, it would create architectural
continuity and give balance to the front of the building. With
regard to the posts, the plan shows round post column veneers.
Mr. Centina stated it is the cap. They are square with rounded
caps. It will have a trowel finish. Committee Member
Cunningham stated that was not the same as the building because
it is not slumpstone. This adds another element to the design. It
should be a flat trellis all across the front using 8' X ,B' posts
exposed with a decorative corbel on the top and have it come off
the slumpstone wall so the wall is the base of the column and the
slumpstone boxes out where it comes out and the base would be
a 36" high slumpstone column base. The object is to have a
shaded structure and not massive architecture out to the curb.
This would be a more permanent structure and attractive:.
11. Committee Member Bobbitt concurred, as long it does not
overpower. Instead of using the lattice use something heavier.
Ms. Cetina stated that in the beginning they wanted a 'tile roof,
and the HPC wants a wood trellis with shade cloth. It is not what
they want to use. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the tile
would be difficult to make it fit in. From a patio cover look it will
look better with the heavier the wood. Using 2' X 3's they will
twist. If you use 4' X 4' with 50% coverage you would need 2-3"
spacing.
12. Committee Member Reynolds stated he agreed with what had
been stated.
13. Committee Member Cunningham asked what would happen if they
state they do not agree architecturally with the HPC
recommendation; what will the applicant have to do? Staff stated
that if the applicant requests it, the application would have to go
back to the HPC and then the City Council. Committee Member
Cunningham asked if the applicant could appeal the decision.
Staff stated no. The Committee's action is for the CPIP funding
and not for the architecture. What if the process were reversed.
If they had approved it before the HPC. This process is penalizing
the applicant. He would vote for funding, but the problern he has
is the design of the patio cover as approved by the HPC. He does
not want to vote to give City money as it is designed and does not
062
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCIO-4-OO.wpd 5
6
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
October 4, 2000
want to have the applicant go through a hardship to go back to the
HPC/City Council. This process needs to be worked out.
Assistant City Manager Mark Weiss stated it is the applicant's
decision as to which committee/commission they go through first.
14. Committee Member Cunningham stated that when he has to
appear before the City Council on a project and it appears it will be
denied, he will ask for a continuance to allow time to resolve the
problem. This is clearly a difference in opinion based on an
architectural standpoint. Therefore, he would like to request a
continuance. Mr. Cetina stated he had spoken with Planning
Manager di lorio and this was her recommendation to the HPC.
15. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he does not understand why it
should have to take two months to receive a simple change. Staff
stated that if their original design did not meet the Secretary of
Interior recommendations then this may be the reason for the HPC
recommendation.
16. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Cunningham/Reynolds to continue approval of
Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-001 to a special
meeting of the ALRC to give staff time to review the approval
process.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Reynolds to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and
Landscaping Review Committee to a special meeting to be held on October 18, 2000.
This meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a.m. on October 10, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
063
Ct\My Documents\WPD0CSVALRC10-4-OO.wpd 6
Tc) 0YYW(.ti0)1D1 use u('Cb�kplete-
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall ®�
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
November 1, 2000
CALL TO ORDER
10:00 a.m.
A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called
to order at 10:00 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di lorio who led the
flag salute.
B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham, and Frank
Reynolds.
C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan
Sawa and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Principal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the
Minutes of October 18, 2000. There being no corrections, it was moved
and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve
the minutes as submitted.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Specific Plan 2000-045 Site Development Permit 2000-677; a request
of Evergreen for review of landscaping plant pallette for a commercial
office complex and land, and building elevations for a drugstore to be
located at the southeast corner of 5O' Avenue and Washington Street.
1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member
C?\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCI I - I-OO.wpd 1
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 1,2000
3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt MinutE: Motion
2000-020 recommending approval of the landscaping plant
pallette and building elevations for Specific Plan 2000-045 and
Site Development Permit 2000-677. Unanimously approved.
B. Site Development Permit 2000-685; a request of Tait and Associates for
review of building elevations and landscaping plans for a 3,984 square
foot convenience store located on the northwest corner of Highway 111
and Washington Street within Point Happy Specific Plan.
Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member
3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion
2000-021 recommending approval of the building elevations and
landscaping plans for Site Development Permit 2000-685
Unanimously approved.
C. General Plan Amendment 2000-071. Zone Change 2000-09Village
Use Permit 2000-004, and Environmental Assessment 2000-402; a
request of Chapman Golf Development, LLC for review of building
elevations and landscaping plans for an 11,900 square foot restaurant to
be located on the northeast corner of 52"d Avenue and Desert Club Drive.
4. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
5. Committee Member
6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion
2000-022 recommending approval of building elevations and
landscaping plans for General Plan Amendment 2000-071, Zone
0 la
C:AMy Documents\WPDOCSVALRCI 1-1-OO.wpd 2
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November 1, 2000
Change 2000-096, Village Use Permit 2000-004, and
Environmental Assessment 2000-402 2000-045. Unanimously
approved.
D. Site Development Permit 2000-665; a request of Steven Walker Homes
for review of landscaping plans for model homes, approved prototype
residential plans, and common areas for Tract 29347 in Specific Plan 90-
015 (Norman Course).
1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member
3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt Minute; Motion
2000-021 recommending approval of the building elevations and
landscaping plans for Site Development Permit 2000-685
Unanimously approved.
E. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-003; a request of Mary
Hope Franco, La Quinta Video and Paging for a funding request to install
new landscaping fence, and awning with illuminated sign for the property
located at 78-040 Avenida La Fonda.
Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member
3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt Minute: Motion
2000-024 recommending approval of the building elevations and
landscaping plans for Commercial Property Improvement Program
2000-003, with a vote of Unanimously approved.
F. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2000-004; a request of
Michael & Annie Fischer, Village Park Animal Hospital for a funding
request to construct a block wall along the west property line for the
property located at 77-895 Avenida Montezuma.
066
C:AMy Documents\WPDOCSVALRCII-I-OO.wpd 3
Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes
November I.2000
Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
2. Committee Member
3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Member Bobbitt/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion
2000-025 recommending approval of the building elevations and
landscaping plans for Commercial Property Improvement Program
2000-004, with a vote of _ Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members
Cunningham/Reynolds to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and
Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on November 1, 2000.
This meeting was adjourned at a.m. on December 6, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
061
A.4
C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCI 1-1-OO.wpd 4