2001 10 18 HPCF YS
CF`y OF
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
The Regular Meeting to be held in the Session Room at
La Quinta City Hall, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
October 18, 2001
3:00 P.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2001-016
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Historic Preservation
Commission on matters relating to historic resources within the City of La Quinta
which are not Agenda items. When addressing the Historic Preservation
Commission, please state your name and address and when discussing matters
pertaining to prehistoric sites, do not disclose the exact location of the site(s) for
their protection.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the regular Minutes for the meeting of September 20, 2001.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. phase I Cultural Resources Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch Project
Area: a request for approval of the Phase I Cultural Resources investigation
of a 43 acre parcel of property located on the west side of Washington
Street, approximately 300 feet south of Highway 111.
Applicant: Point Happy Ranch, LLC
Archaeological Consultant: McKenna Et Al (Jeanette A. McKenna, Principal)
P:\CAROLYN\hpc Agenda.wpd
B. C-u-Itural Resources Assessment For Tentative Tr= 30331: a request for
approval of the Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract 30331,
a vacant rectangular 4.18 acre parcel located on the north side of Avenue
50, west of Jefferson Street.
Applicants: Santa Properties and Development LLC
Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (James Brock)
C. Historical Archaeological and PaleontoloaiicReoor� a request
for approval of the Historical, Archaeological, and Paleontological Resources
Report for a 15 acre parcel of vacant land located on the north side of
Avenue 58, approximately midway between Jefferson Street and Madison
Street.
Applicant: Coachella Valley Engineers (For La Quinta Construction)
Archaeological and Paleontological Consultant: CRM Tech (Bruce Love,
Principal)
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
Vill. ADJOURNMENT
P:\CAROLYN\hpc Agenda.wpd * 0 0 2
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
September 20, 2001
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman
Maria Puente at 3:00 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call.
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call.
Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman
Puente. Unanimously approved.
Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner
Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker.
ll. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/ Mitchell to approve
the Minutes of July 19, 2001. Unanimously approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 + Acre Parcel a request
for approval of an assessment including a records search and field
reconnaissance of the property, along with archival research for the
property located at the southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue
52. Applicant: RLF Development - Archaeological Consultant:
Archaeological Associates.
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department, with the following change in
Recommendation 1.
003
P:\CAR0LYN\HPC9-20-01.wpd - I -
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
September 20, 2001
The report currently recommends "That a report on the monitoring
shall be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for
approval prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit, or final
inspection in the study area." The recommendation should read
"The monitoring report shall be submitted to the Historic
Preservation Commission prior to issuance of the first building
permit."
2. Commissioner Sharp asked if the house on the subject property
would remain. Principal Planner Sawa answered no, it would be
removed. Planning Manager di lorio commented the whole
property would be graded, including removal of the dune area.
3. Commissioner Sharp asked if this property was in the area that is
currently planned for a Ralphs grocery store. Principal Planner
Sawa answered no. This property is located on Avenue 52, and
the Ralphs property is located on Avenue 50, approximately a mile
away.
4. Commissioner Wright stated the property was the triangular
parcel not included in the Country Club of the Desert project.
5. Commissioner Sharp asked if staff knew what the developer was
proposing to build. Planning Manager di lorio stated it could
possibly be a drug store, market and a bank, but project tenants
are not known at this time.
6. Commissioners Mitchell, Wright, and Sharp stated they supported
staff's recommendations.
7. Commissioner Irwin also supported staff's recommendations, and
asked that the monitoring continue on the project.
8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2001-013
recommending approval of the Phase I Cultural Resources
Assessment of a 15± Acre Parcel, located at the southeast corner
of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52. Unanimously approved.
P:ACAROLYN\HPC9-20-Ol.wpd -2-
004
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
September 20, 2001
B. Archaeological Monitoring Report for the Miles Avenue BorrowSite; a
request for approval of soil removal operations and leveling report at the
project borrow site. Applicant: City of La Quinta - Archaeological
Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love).
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
2. Commissioners Mitchell and Wright supported staff's
recommendations.
3. Commissioner Irwin supported staff's recommendation but
requested monitoring when development begins on the property.
4. Commissioner Sharp asked a question about this parcel being a
portion of a larger parcel. Principal Planner Sawa answered yes,
it was. Planning Manager di lorio commented Phase II had been
completed on the whole property, but this particular area was of
concern because of sand blowing from the dune onto the
neighbors' property. Once development begins the rest of the
monitoring will be completed.
5. Commissioner Sharp stated he supported staff's
recommendations.
6. Chairman Puente asked a question about the location of curation
facilities.
7. Commissioner Irwin answered artifacts are currently stored at the
La Quinta Historical Museum until the new museum is complete.
There was general discussion about storage and preservation
practices. Planning Manager di lorio stated all items were boxed
and kept up to museum and curation standards.
S. Chairman Puente asked how the human remains were handled.
Planning Manager di lorio answered there are Federal Laws
prescribing how these items are handled.
9. Chairman Puente asked when the new museum was going to be
completed.
P:\CAR0LYN\HPC9-20-01.wpd -3- 005
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
September 20, 2001
10. Commissioner Irwin answered the current time frame is projected
to be within two years. In the meantime, all artifacts are being
kept in a secured, air conditioned room with all items in an acid -
free environment, p,operly labeled, with all the catalogs and
reports per Commission direction.
11. Chairman Puente stated she supported staff's recommendations.
12. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Irwin/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2001-014
recommending approval of the Archaeological Monitoring Report
for the Miles Avenue Borrow Site; a request for approval of soil
removal operations and leveling report at the project borrow site.
C. Phase II Archaeological Testing. Mitig to ion, and Monitoring of a Ten Ace
Commercial Site; a request for review of a final report on the testing and
monitoring of the grading at the site. Applicant: Madison Development
(Ed Alderson) - Historic Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love)
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained
in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community
Development Department.
2. Commissioners Mitchell and Wright stated they supported staff's
recommendations.
3. Commissioner Irwin had a question regarding one of the
restaurants having a basement. Planning Manager di lorio
answered that had been an issue but it had not been determined
whether a basement could be included.
4. Commissioner Irwin asked that a condition be added that if a
basement is added monitoring be required if there was excavation
below the normal grade. She cited the proximity to the
Whitewater area. Planning Manager di lorio stated that condition
could be added.
5. Commissioner Sharp stated he accepted staff's recommendations.
6. Chairman Puente stated she supported staff's recommendations.
P:\CAROLWHPC9-20-01.wpd -4 1.. 006
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
September 20, 2001
7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Sharp/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2001-015
recommending approval of the Archaeological Monitoring Report
for the Miles Avenue Borrow Site; a request for approval of soil
removal operations and leveling report at the project borrow site,
with the addition of the following recommendation:
A. Monitoring shall be required during excavation, if a
basement is approved for any of the buildings.
Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
A. Relay for life memo from Community Services Director, Dodie Horvitz.
B. Cultural Commission Symposium on November 3 from 12:00 - 6:00 p.m.
C. Question about Museum Conference in October to fulfill CLG (Certified
Local Government) eligibility requirements for Chairman Puente,
Vill. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners
Sharp/Mitchell to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the
next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on October 18, 2001. This meeting of the
Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:22 p.m., October 18, 2001.
Unanimously approved.
Submitted by:
Carolyn Walker
Secretary
P:\CAROLYN\HPC9-20-01.wpd -5-
007
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2001
ITEM: PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATION OF THE
POINT HAPPY RANCH PROJECT AREA
LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET, APPROXIMATELY
300 FEET SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 111
APPLICANT: POINT HAPPY RANCH, LLC
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT: MC KENNA ET AL (JEANETTE A. MC KENNA, PRINCIPAL)
BACKGROUND:
The study area is a irregularly shaped property, consisting of approximately 43 acres
of land, 19 acres of which are steep mountain terrain. A mixed use project consisting
of a mixture of senior housing types and related commercial has been proposed for
the flat portions of the property. A Phase I (survey level) cultural resources
assessment has been completed for the property. This assessment is part of the
Environmental Impact Report required by the California Environmental Quality Act for
the project applications. The assessment includes a records search and field
reconnaissance of the property, along with archival research.
DISCUSSION:
An archaeological records search for the property was conducted at the Eastern
Information Center located at UC Riverside. The records search indicated that the
study area had not been previously surveyed for cultural resources and no
archaeological sites have been recorded within the study area. Within a one mile
radius of the property 85 studies have been completed. As a result of these studies,
46 prehistoric archaeological sites, three historic properties and 17 isolated artifact
locations have been recorded. Of the three historic properties, two are within the
study area.
The intensive on -foot field survey of the surface of the study area did not result in
any prehistoric sites or features being found. However, the general region around the
study area is considered highly sensitive for buried prehistoric resources.
Gu8
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 the pointe @ pt happy.wpd
Historical background research was conducted at the Bureau of Land Management
Office in Riverside, County of Riverside Assessor's Office, County of Riverside Hall
of Records, City of La Quinta Building and Community Development Departments, and
La Quinta Historical Society. The search resulted in an historic chronology of the
properties development beginning in 1922-23 with early improvements and the
naming of the property as "Point Happy Date Gardens." The report documents the
various stages of use and improvements on the property over the years.
The evaluation of the historic resources within the point Happy Date Farm property
were based on the basic requirements of The California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). The results yielded evidence of two resources - an historic road alignment
and the date farm.
The historic road alignment which ran along the base of the hillsides apparently
connected the Indian Wells areas with the area to the southeast (towards the Salton
Sea). The road to the north and south has been demolished due to development.
The road is identifiable but lacks integrity due to re -grading and other impacts, cannot
be associated with any specific individual or event and cannot provide any data of
architectural value. In conclusion, the road should be considered a historic resource,
but not a significant resource. Therefore, no further studies are warranted.
The date ranch and orchard use of the property is concluded to be a significant
historic resource because it meets or has the potential to meet the following CEQA
Criteria:
Criteria 1. The development of orchards and date farms in the deserts of Southern
California has been identified as a significant event in California. The
Point Happy Ranch was one of the top ranches in the Valley and its
products were recognized regionally.
Criteria 2. Mrs. Clarke established The Point Happy Date arm of the farm. The
Clarke's have been recognized in Southern California history for the
contributions to the development of the Coachella Valley, Rancho Santa
Fe (San Diego County), and in the City of Los Angeles.
Criteria 4. The property is in an area considered sensitive for buried prehistoric
remains. As such, it has the potential to yield information important to
the historic or prehistoric record.
Architecturally, there is no evidence of significant remains. Some structures dating
to the historic period have been removed or modified, while other newer structures
(Post 1948) have been added. Elements of the historic property reflect no unique
architectural elements and, for the most part, are not in good condition. Furthermore,
there is no evidence to associate these structures with any known or recognized
009
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 the pointe @ pt happy.wpd
artisan. As such, the complex does not meet the State requirements for significance,
but should be considered a local resource.
Overall, the Point Happy Ranch should be considered a significant historic resource
and adverse impacts (demolition and new construction) to the resource will require
some level of mitigation. The report recommends that an oral history program be
completed as a mitigation measure.
The report states that although no potential prehistoric resources were encountered,
the region near the study area has been found to contain prehistoric remains.
Therefore, the report recommends tree removal, demolition, grading, grubbing, and
other earth -moving activities in the study area be monitored by a qualified
archaeologist.
With these measures, potential impacts will be mitigated to a less than significant
level.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2001- , accepting "A Phase I Cultural Resources
Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch Project Area in the City of La Quinta, Riverside
County. California", as prepared by McKenna et al, subject to the following condition:
1. That a report on the monitoring and oral history program shall be submitted to
the HPC for approval prior to issuance of the first building permit in the study
area.
Attachment:
1. A Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch Project
Area in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California (Commissioners
only)
Prepared by: Submitted By:
'�=5 M- Pp - Sa A ws
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Christine di lorio, Planni kg Manager
010
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 the pointe @ pt happy.wpd
ATTACHMENT 1
34
iw
A,
AMU.
1" 0 R R F S M A R I IN K Z
LOCATION MAP .- - oll
DATE:
ITEM:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT:
BACKGROUND:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 18, 2001
CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 30331
NORTH SIDE OF 50TH AVENUE, WEST OF JEFFERSON
STREET
SANTA PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC
ARCHAEOLOGICAL ADVISORY GROUP (JAMES BROCK)
The property is a vacant rectangular 4.18 acre parcel on the north side of 5OTH
Avenue, west of Jefferson Street. A Phase I (survey level) cultural resources
assessment has been completed for an application for a tentative tract map to create
seven residential lots. This assessment will be part of the Environmental Assessment
required by the California Environmental Quality Act for the project application. The
cultural resources assessment includes a archaeological records search and field
reconnaissance of the property, along with limited archival research.
DISCUSSION:
An archaeological records search for the property was conducted at the Eastern
Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS)
at UC Riverside. The records search indicated that the study area had not been
previously surveyed for cultural resources. Approximately 80 % of the area within
a one-half mile radius of the property, including all properties within the City limits,
has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. Thirty archaeological sites have
been recorded within one-half of the study area. Of particular interest for this project
is site CA-RIV-6146, (Primary No. 33-8427) a major intact deposit previously recorded
directly adjacent to the east boundary of the study area.
An archival search was conducted at the Science Library Map Room at UC Riverside
and on the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land patent web site. The study area
falls within an area that was once part of a 160 acre homestead granted to Carlton
pl\stan\hpc rpt ph 1tt 30331.wpd 012
Woodhouse. It is unclear where Mr. Woodhouse's home was located. A residence
on the study area apparently constructed between 1941 and 1959 was present on
a 1959 USGS Palm Desert map near 50"' Avenue, but was apparently demolished
some time ago. It was apparently not Mr. Woodhouse's home which would have had
to be present in 1917.
The on foot field reconnaissance of the study area resulted in a moderate scatter of
prehistoric sherds and thermally affected clay fragments in the central eastern part
of the study area. Mr. Brock determined the artifacts form a continuous deposit with
CA-RIV-6146 and, as a result, updated the site record form to reflect the expansion
of the deposit from this adjacent property.
Due to a mixture of modern debris (glass, concrete, plastic, metal) with the prehistoric
artifacts, it probably indicates this area has been disturbed. There are areas on the
study area that have been excavated for lakes or ponds with the fill material
distributed over parts of the site. Therefore, there is potential for buried, intact
archaeological deposits to be present below the recorded archaeological deposit or
on other portions of the property.
Further testing of the study area is needed in order to identify, or evaluate the
potential for buried archaeological deposits. The report recommends approximately
ten backhoe test excavations be conducted primarily on the recorded site area, but
also in other areas that appear to have potential for resource preservation. A report
detailing the results of the Phase 2 testing will be submitted, along with future
recommendations, as necessary (e.g. monitoring).
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2001- , accepting the "Cultural Resources Assessment for
Tentative Tract 30331, Avenue50 Wet of Jefferson Street, La Quinta California",
as prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, subject to the following conditions:
1. A report on the testing shall be prepared and submitted for HPC approval prior
to approval of the project by the City Council.
2. Collected cultural/paleontological resources shall be properly packaged for long
term curation, in polyethylene sel-seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate,
all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property.
Materials will be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and
records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
013
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1tt 30331.wpd
Attachment:
1. Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract 30331, Avenue 50 West
of Jefferson Street, La Quinta, California (Commissioners only)
Prepared by:
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
Submitted By:
2�
Christine di lori ,Planning Manager
014
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 30331.wpd
E31 #C
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2001
ITEM: HISTORICAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, AND
PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF 58T" AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY
MIDWAY BETWEEN JEFFERSON STREET AND MADISON
STREET
APPLICANT: COACHELLA VALLEY ENGINEERS (FOR LA QUINTA
CONSTRUCTION)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND
PALEONTOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT: CRM TECH (BRUCE LOVE, PRINCIPAL)
BACKGROUND:
The study area is a 15 acre parcel of vacant land on the north side of 581" Avenue,
between Jefferson Street and Madison Street. A Phase I (survey level) cultural and
paleontological resources assessment has been completed for a tentative tract
application ITT 29963) for construction of a single family development. The
assessment includes an archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources
record search and field reconnaissance of the property. This assessment will be part
of the environmental review required by the California Environmental Quality Act for
the project application.
DISCUSSION:
Archaeological and Historical:
An archaeological records search for the property was conducted at the Eastern
Information Center located at UC Riverside. The records search indicated that the
study area had not been previously surveyed for cultural resources and no
archaeological sites have been recorded within or adjacent to the project area. Within
a one-half mile radius of the property 14 area -specific cultural resources studies have
been conducted, including on the properties immediately to the north and south and
along 58T" Avenue (linear study). As a result of these studies, four prehistoric
archaeological sites and one historic -era site have been recorded. The prehistoric
sites consist primarily of scatters of lithic and ceramic scatters, although a fire
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 29963.wpd 015
hearth/roasting fire pit feature was noted at one of the sites. None of these
previously recorded sites was located in the vicinity of the project area.
Historical background research was conducted at the Science Library Map Room at
UC Riverside and at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Office in Riverside. The
search did not indicate any use of the property to the present day.
The intensive -level on -foot field survey of the study area did not result in any
prehistoric sites, features, isolates, or evidence of objects, sites, features, or artifacts
more than 50 years old. There was a scattering of cans, broken glass, pieces of
lumber, and plastic. CRM TECH states that none of the items appear to be more than
50 years of age.
Paleontological:
The project area is at an elevation of approximately 30 feet below sea level.
Holocene or ancient Lake Cahuilla has at least seven times in the past covered much
of the project and surrounding area. The last high water elevation of the lake was at
42 feet above sea level. Therefore, the project area has been under water in the
past. The records search indicated that the project area had not been previously
surveyed for paleontological resources. Based on previous discoveries reported
nearby, the San Bernardino County Museum considers the project area to have a
"high paleontological sensitivity" which has a high potential to impact significant
nonrenewable fossil resources, primarily invertebrate fossils.
During the field survey scatters of fresh water shells and shell fragments were
observed on the surface of the project area. Fresh water mullusks remains were also
noted on the ground. However, no fish bone or other vertebrate fossil remains were
found.
CONCLUSIONS:
The archaeological resources report notes the records search, the historical research,
and archaeological field survey produced negative results and no resources more than
fifty years old. Therefore, approval of the project will have no effect on any
"historical resources" as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The report states that no further investigation is recommended unless the project area
is expanded or buried cultural materials are discovered during construction.
The paleontological resources report concludes the project area has a moderate
potential for Holocene vertebrate fossils and high potential for Holocene invertebrate
remains. As such, impacts created by the proposed project need to be mitigated
11 V
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 29963.wpd
pursuant to CEQA requirements. Paleontological monitoring during earth -moving
activities and preparation of a final report on the monitoring are included in the
recommendation of the report.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt Minute Motion 2001- , accepting the "Historical/Archaeological
Resources Survey Report - Coral Mountain Estates Tentative Tract 29963",
as prepared by CRM TECH.
2. Adopt Minute Motion 2001- , accepting the "Paleontological Resources
Assessment Regort - Coral Mountain Estates, Tentative Tract 299-U", as
prepared by CRM TECH, subject to the following conditions:
A. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first building
permit for the project.
B. Collected paleontological resources are to be delivered to the City of La
Quinta for curation per City requirements.
Attachments:
1. Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report - Coral Mountain Estates
(Commissioners only)
2. Paleontological Resources Assessment Report - Coral Mountain Estates
(Commissioners only)
Prepared by: Submitted
By:
t, ayTn.
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner Christine di lori , Planning Manager
017
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 29963.wpd