2003 08 29 HPCOPT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AG EN ®A
The Special Meeting to be held in the Session Room at the
La Quinta City Hall, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
AUGUST 29, 2003
3:00 P.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2003-009
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Historic Preservation
Commission on matters relating to historic resources within the City of La Quinta
which are not Agenda items. When addressing the Historic Preservation
Commission, please state your name and address and when discussing matters
pertaining to prehistoric sites, do not disclose the exact location of the site(s) for
their protection.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meeting of June 19, 2003
►•� i►i*Syrrakv,R3
A. PHASE 1 HISTORICAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, AND PALEONTOLOGICAL
RESOURCES REPORT.
Applicant: Coachella Valley Engineers for Madison/58th Partners.
Paleontological Consultant: CRM TECH — Michael Hogan, Principal
Location: South side of Avenue 58, approximately %: mile west of
Madison Street.
OK/*oA
B. RESULTS OF PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 03-065.
Applicant: Centex Destination Properties.
Archaeological Consultant: Statistical Research, Inc.
Location: West side of Eisenhower Drive at Coachella Drive.
C. Historic Preservation Commission Work Program
Progress report.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
002
4FC14�n
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
The Regular Meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
June 19, 2003
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by
Chairperson, Leslie Mouriquand at 3:03 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked
for the roll call.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
Present: Commissioners Irwin, Wright, Sharp and Chairman
Mouriquand. It was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright/Sharp to excuse
Commissioner Puente. Unanimously approved.
Staff Present: Planning Manager, Oscar Orci, Principal
Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn
Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Wright to
approve the Minutes of May 15, 2003 as submitted. Unanimously
approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Paleontological Assessment Report for Desert Elite Rancho
Santana for Specific Plan 2003-064
Applicant: Desert Elite, Inc.
Paleontological Consultant: San Bernardino County Museum,
Division of Geological Sciences
Location: Southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Monroe Street.
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
003 t
2. Commissioners Irwin and Wright stated they liked the
additional condition regarding curation and suggested it be
used as a standard condition in future reports.
3. Chairperson Mouriquand asked if the City Museum was
equipped to curate all the collected artifacts. Commissioner
Irwin replied the Museum was currently storing everything
properly.
4. Planning Manager Orci stated the consultant was concerned
about the storage of the collections and that was the reason
the conditions were modified.
5. Chairperson Mouriquand stated one of her concerns was
whether the collections were being made available to
qualified researchers, upon written request.
6. Commissioner Irwin stated the curation standards had been
developed by this Commission and were being followed.
She also commented on the possibility of determining a
storage fee for the curated materials. This had been
discussed but no action had ever been taken. Staff replied
the City is currently funding the entire curation.
7. Commissioner Irwin suggested this could be part of the
developer's fees. She also added the City Museum had
been approached about taking collections from outside La
Quinta. She wanted the Commission to include this
information in any future discussion about curation at the
City Museum.
8. Chairperson Mouriquand stated she didn't see any problems
with the report and liked the revised conditions. She then
asked the applicant if he wished to make comments.
9. Applicant, John Pedalino, stated the only comment he
received was from Kathleen Springer of the San Bernardino
County Museum. She had indicated their Museum wanted
the artifacts. Staff explained that all City artifacts are kept
within the City.
10. Planning Manager Orci commented he had discussed this
situation with Ms. Springer and her concern was that
everything was curated and stored properly. He was sending
her a copy of the City's Curation Standards.
11. Commissioner Sharp commented it would have helped if the
report had included a map.
, .. 0U4 2
12. There being no further discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt Minute
Motion 2003-008 accepting the Paleontological Assessment
Report for Desert Elite, Rancho Santana, for Specific (Plan
2003-064, with the revised conditions as follows:
1. On and off site monitoring in areas identified as likely
to contain paleontological resources shall be
conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor.
The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as
they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and
to remove samples of sediments which are likely to
contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and
vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to
temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal
of abundant or large specimens. Proof of retention of
monitor shall be given to City prior to issuance of first
earth -moving permit, or before any clearing of the: site
is begun.
2. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point
of identification and permanent preservation,
including washing of sediments to recover small
invertebrates and vertebrates.
3. A report of findings with an appended itemized
inventory of specimens shall be submitted to the City
prior to first occupancy of a residence being granted
by the City. The report shall include pertinent
discussions of the significance of all recovered
resources where appropriate. The report and
inventory, when submitted, will signify completion of
the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological
resources.
4. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be
given to the City for depository into the City museum
which is to be constructed. Packaging of resources,
reports, etc. shall comply with standards commonly
used in the paleontological industry.
Unanimously approved.
00
3
A. Historic preservation Commission Work Program
1. Planning Manager, Oscar Orci gave an update on the
progress of the Commissions Work Program, which included
the following points:
a). A comparison of the City's Historic Preservation Code
to the State's, and other communities with similar
codes. Of concern was Section 7.02, General
Regulations and Administration. This section
describes the purpose and intent of the Historic
Preservation Program and indicates the Commission
is an advisory body to the Planning Director on
certain environmental issues. This is in conflict with
other provisions of the Code allowing the Commission
to approve or deny projects. This is a conflict which
needs to be cleared up.
b). The role of this Commission is very clearly defined.
However, there are no historic landmarks or historic
districts identified which brings up the question of the
survey. The Commission will need to recommend to
the City Council whether they wish a recon survey or
an intensive survey, keeping in mind the cost of an
intense survey will be higher.
c). The survey area needs to be defined. Should the
whole City be surveyed or just selected (parts
depending upon the funds allotted or obtained?
d). Need to develop a Historic Context. A Context
Statement had been written several years back which
should still be available for use. The draft would need
to be brought before the Commission to be reviewed,
approved and finalized.
e). Numerous photos had been taken over the years that
could be included as exhibits and should be in the
City's files.
000'
M
f). Once the Historic Context is finalized, the
Commission will need to determine how to link the
Context to the City's built environment to help define
the scope of the survey. The survey could be done in
layers of time with the Context Statement identifying
those layers as well as thematic issues. A theme
should be developed and possibly, property types
such as archeological, paleontological, or more
contemporary
g). The City has set aside a budget of $15,000 for
historic preservation plans. This was the total budget
allocated for the Commission which would have to
cover the cost of doing a large survey area. Grant
opportunities were being researched. Four had been
found, one of which was the CLG grant. The status
of the State budget has caused CLG funding to be
reduced from $250,000 - $150,000 to $90,000 with
more reductions. Still staff would check into possible
foundation grants, such as the National Trust for
Historic Preservation, and the California Council for
the Humanities.
h). Staff to locate and bring to Commission the
Preservation Plan.
i). A Commission sponsored training workshop for other
local governments with a keynote speaker to be
obtained and other local governments invited. The
focus could be on desert issues, training for Planning
Departments/Commissioners, Council Members and
issues for other cities with Preservation Commissions.
Possibly the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society
could be invited to assist in presentations.
j). Staff to look into funding for this project. A key theme
should be identified for the training and then locate a
speaker who could address the theme. Possibly
someone well versed in Archaeology and
Paleontology. Local Native American tribes should
be invited.
k). Some focus on Paleontology, especially in the
outlying areas of the City, should be done. Kathy
Springer could make a presentation on the subject, at
the training session.
007 5
1). Training on how and why to recommend conditions
should be included, especially for those cities which
do not have Historic Preservation Commissions. The
Guidelines for Curation of Archaeological Provisions
have to have irrelevant items taken out and have
correct criteria added in our Code Requirements.
Also needed are Archaeological Resource
Management Reports (ARMR) formats.
m). Guidelines would be great to touch on with a sample
archaeological report which could be understood by a
layperson. There could also be information on how a
planner reviews a project and makes recommenda-
tions.
n). Suggest a time frame for the training, looking possibly
at the Fall. There could also be a speaker to talk
about the CLG program from SHPO such as Kathy
Springer or Eric Scott, on the "Art of Paleontology".
Some topics dealing with prehistoric or Native
American topics could also be included.
o). Possible dates could be Friday the 7th, or Saturday
the 8th, of November. Feedback had been received
from conferences attended, that people did not want
to attend on their free time, but would prefer to go
during the week.
p). A survey would be made of the various jurisdictions to
obtain possible dates and interest. An outline could
be sent to the CLG Coordinator at SHPO, requesting
CLG training credits for this event. Also suggested
was having Gary Resvaloso or Judy Stapp (Cultural
Coordinators for the local Tribes) give 30-minute
presentations on the Native American perspective.
There are many potential speakers right here in the
Valley.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
A. Information was included on the Kern County Museum and a
historic walking tour of downtown Bakersfield.
008 6
V. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
A. Commissioner Sharp informed the Commission he was producing
an event with the Torres Martinez Bird Singers at the Children's
Discovery Museum on November 9, 2003.
B. Chairperson Mouriquand informed the Commission this was
Commissioner Irwin's last meeting and she was being presented
with a "Resolution of Recognition" for her years of service to the
City. Chairperson Mouriquand then read the Resolution into the
minutes.
Resolution of Recognition
A Resolution of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
La Quinta, California Commending Barbara Irwin
WHEREAS, Barbara Irwin has served as a member of the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, a
Certified Local Government per the State Historic Preservation
Office, since her appointment in July 1997, by dedicating her time
and devotion to the betterment to historic preservation and cultural
resource management; and,
WHEREAS, during Ms. Irwin's term some of the major preservation
decisions of the Commission have included the rehabilitation and
National Register Assessment of the Hacienda del Gato and the
preservation, in place, of prehistoric archaeological site CA-RIV-
1179 at the Tradition Club development; the Miraflores housing
subdivision; the seismic retrofit and rehabilitation of the Fisher
Building in the La Quinta Village; the National Register
Assessments of the La Quinta Hotel, Water Morgan House, Cyrus
Pierce House, and La Sala; the discovered of the "Burning Dune"
site (CA-RIV-4754), an important archaeological site in the
Coachella Valley history, and the Phase 111 data recovery of two
archaeological sites determined to be potentially significant
according to National Register criteria within Tentative Tract Map
28964; and
WHEREAS, during Ms. Irwin's term the major preservation planning
accomplishments of the Commission consisted of adopting the first
City-wide Historic Resources Survey, conducted in 1997 and
supported by a grant awarded by the Certified Local Government
Program, and the President's Award bestowed by the California
Preservation Foundation for exceptional service in preserving
California's cultural and architectural heritage; and work on the
City's Context Statement; and,
009 7
WHEREAS, Ms. Irwin has honorably served the Commission by
lending her expertise in reviewing and providing direction for
numerous cases in the regular meetings, helping with the California
Preservation Foundation Annual Meetings in Palm Springs in May
1999, representing the City of La Quinta at the California
Preservation Foundation Conferences, serving as the
Commission's representative for the expansion of the C:ity's
Museum, and participating in several preservation training
workshops; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Historic
Preservation Commission of the City of La Quinta, California that
due to the amount of time and energy that has been devoted to the
City of La Quinta by Ms. Irwin, this Resolution shall be recorded as
part of the official Minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission
for this meeting.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
La Quinta Historic Preservation Commission, held on this 19th day
of June 2003.
C. Commissioner Irwin thanked the Commission for the Resolution
and stated they had a lot of work ahead of them. She thanked the
Commission for the privilege of working with them.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adjourn this Regular Meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission to the next Regular Meeting to be held
on July 17, 2003. This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission
was adjourned at 3:47 p.m. Unanimously approved.
Submitted by:
Carolyn Walker
Secretary
010 8
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND
PALEONTOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT:
BACKGROUND:
AUGUST 29, 2003
PHASE 1 HISTORICAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, AND
PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT
SOUTH SIDE OF AVENUE 58, APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF
MILE WEST OF MADISON STREET
COACHELLA VALLEY ENGINEERS (FOR MADISON/58TH
PARTNERS)
CRM TECH (MICHAEL HOGAN, PRINCIPAL)
The study area is a 33± acre parcel of land on the south side of Avenue 58, between
Jefferson Street and Madison Street. An abandoned single-family residence, shooting
range and plant nursery exist on the property. The nursery is placed on a filled
portion of the west side of the site. A Phase I (survey level) cultural and
paleontological resources assessment has been completed for a tentative tract
application (TT 31249) to allow construction of a single family development. The
assessment includes an archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources
record search and field reconnaissance of the property. This assessment will be part
of the environmental review required by the California Environmental Quality Act for
the project application.
DISCUSSION:
Archaeological and Historical:
An archaeological records search for the property was conducted at the Eastern
Information Center located at UC Riverside. The records search indicated that the
eastern half of the study area had been previously surveyed for cultural resources,
but no archaeological sites have been recorded within or adjacent to the project area.
Within a one-half mile radius of the property, 20 area -specific cultural resources
studies have been conducted. As a result of these surrounding studies, 15
prehistoric archaeological sites and two historic -era site have been recorded. The
prehistoric sites consist primarily of scatters of lithic and ceramic scatters, .although
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 31249.wpd
a fire hearth/roasting fire pit feature was noted at one of the sites. None of these
previously recorded sites is located in the vicinity of the project area.
Historical background research was conducted at the Science Library Map Room at
UC Riverside and at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Office in Moreno Valley.
The search did not indicate any historic (older than 50 years old) use of the property.
During the recent past, the eastern half of the property was used as a shooting range
with the western half used for a plant nursery. All of these abandoned uses are less
than 50 years old.
An intensive -level on -foot field survey of the study area did not result in any
prehistoric sites, features, isolates, or evidence of objects, sites, features, or artifacts
more than 50 years old. There was a scattering of modern trash, primarily related to
the nursery operations.
Paleontological:
The project area is at an elevation of approximately 20-30 feet below sea level.
Holocene or ancient Lake Cahuilla has at least seven times in the past covered much
of the project and surrounding area. The last high water elevation of the lake was at
42 feet above sea level. Therefore, the project area has been under water in the
past. The records search indicated that the project area had not been previously
surveyed for paleontological resources.
During the field survey scatters of fresh water shells and shell fragments were
observed on the surface of the project area. Fresh water mullusks remains were also
noted on the ground. However, no fish bone or other vertebrate fossil remains were
found.
The report concludes the project site is in an area of high paleontological sensitivity
which has a high potential to impact significant nonrenewable fossil resources,
primarily invertebrate fossils. The recommended conditions provide mitigation
measures to address this concern.
CONCLUSIONS:
The archaeological resources report notes the records search, the historical research,
and field survey produced negative results and no resources more than fifty years old.
Therefore, approval of the project will have no effect on any "historical resources"
as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)•
a',':�
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 31249.wpd
The paleontological resources report concludes the project area has a high potential
for Holocene invertebrate remains. As such, impacts created by the proposed project
need to be mitigated pursuant to CEQA requirements. The report recommends that
a surface collection of the freshwater mollusk remains be accomplished on the
eastern half of the property. Paleontological monitoring during earth -moving activities
and preparation of a final report on the monitoring are included in the
recommendation of the report.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt Minute Motion 2003 , accepting the "Historical/Archaeological
Resources Survey Report - Tentative Tract 31249", as prepared by CRM TECH,
subject to the recommendations in the report as amended and added to by the
following conditions:
A. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough
grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of
monitors shall be given to City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or
clearing permit.
B. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first production
home building permit for the project.
C. Collected archaelogical resources shall be properly packaged for long
term curation, in polyethylene sel-seal bags, vials, or film cans as
appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled
archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building
permit for the property. Materials will be accompanied by descriptive
catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the
original graphics.
2. Adopt Minute Motion 2003- , accepting the "Paleontological Resources
Assessment Report - Tentative Tract 31249", as prepared by CRM TECH,
subject to the conditions recommended in the report as amended by the
following conditions:
A. A surface collection of the freshwater mollusk remains be accomplished
on the eastern half of the property prior to issuance of first earth -moving
or clearing permit.
B. On and off site monitoring in areas identified as likely to contain
paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified
paleontological monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils
013
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 31249.wpd
as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove
samples of sediments which are likely to contain the remains of small
fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to
temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or
large specimens. Proof of retention of monitor shall be given to City prior
to issuance of first earth -moving permit, or before any clearing of the
site is begun.
C. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and
permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small
invertebrates and vertebrates.
D. A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens
shall be submitted to the City prior to first occupancy of a residence
being granted by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions
of the significance of all recovered resources where appropriate. The
report and inventory, when submitted, will signify completion of the
program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources.
E. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City
for depository into the City museum which is to be constructed.
Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall comply with standards
commonly used in the paleontological industry.
Attachments:
1. Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report - Tentative Traci: 31249
(Commissioners only)
2. Paleontological Resources Assessment Report - Tentative Tract 31249
(Commissioners only)
Prepared by:
Cb-� PD. zaa�
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
p[\stan\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 31249.wpd
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 29, 2003
ITEM: RESULTS OF PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES FOR SP 03-065
LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF EISENHOWER DRIVE AT COACHELLA
DRIVE
APPLICANT: CENTEX DESTINATION PROPERTIES.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT: STATISTICAL RESEARCH, INC. (SRI)
BACKGROUND:
In June, 1999, Landaq, Inc. was preparing plans and applications for a 105.8 acre
project consisting of a commercial village, resort, and residential development for the
subject property and a portion to the south to the mountain along Eisenhower Drive.
A Phase 1 Cultural Resources report was prepared in anticipation for use in an
Environmental Impact Report for the project (Attachment 1). The report was
reviewed and accepted by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) on June 17,
1999, subject to conditions including a requirement for a Phase 2 site assessment of
four historic sites identified in the Phase 1 report (Attachment 2). The applications
for the proposed project were withdrawn and therefore, the project was not
approved. The Phase 2 site assessment was subsequently completed, but was not
reviewed by the HPC.
An application for a new 280 unit residential project has been submitted for 44.6
acres of the 105.8 acres covered by the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Report. As a
result, the previously prepared Phase 2 Site Assessment has been submitted for
approval and use in the required environmental review.
DISCUSSION:
The Phase 1 review determined that a Phase 2 assessment was necessary for the four
historic -era sites. These sites are located within the area covered by the current
development application.
It was noted that these sites are likely to represent unique resources as defined by
Section 21083.2 (g) of CEQA in that they may contain information needed to answer
p:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 2 sp 03-065.wpd.wpd 0 15
important scientific research questions of a demonstrable public interest and/or may
be directly associated with a scientifically recognized important historic event or
person. They may also represent historical resources as defined by Section 15064.5
(a) of CEQA in that they may be: (1) associated with events that have rnade a
significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural
heritage; (2) associated with the lives of persons important in our past; or (3) likely
to yield information important in history. Specifically, these sites may be related to
early settlement in the Coachella Valley, the development of the hotel/resort industry,
and ranching operations.
The results of the Phase II testing determined the artifacts found at the four sites
were similar in nature. These artifacts included some modern as well as historic -era
items. Artifacts found include small pieces of metal (such as screen, cans
fragments), broken glass, construction materials, some of which could have been
used in the construction of the La Quinta Resort, broken ceramic tableware, and two
isolated sherds of Tizon brown pottery. Shovel testing of these historic sites showed
that there was no subsurface deposits, indicating that the sites are surface scatters
almost all of which can be associated with the adjacent La Quinta Resort and Club.
The report concludes that the historic -era artifacts generally date between 1920 and
1938 and, except for the construction materials, are a combination of kitchen refuse
and guest trash. The testing, analysis, and complete inventory of the contents of
these sites provides full mitigation of project impacts as defined by the California
Environmental Quality Act. No further action or mitigation measure is deemed
necessary to recover the information they may contain.
Additionally, shovel testing of the four prehistoric milling sites did not result in any
subsurface deposits being located.
Furthermore, SRI states that because of the possibility of subsurface archaeological
remains, the prehistoric sites should be monitored by an archaeologist during grading
and other ground disturbing activities.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2003- , accepting the report titled "Phase II Archaeological
Site Assessment for the Villa La Quinta Project, City of La Quinta, Riverside County.
California", as prepared by by Statistical Research, Inc. (SRI), for compliance with
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to the following
conditions:
p:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 2 sp 03-065.wpd.wpd
A. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading
by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be
given to City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit.
B. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first production home
building permit for the project.
C. Collected archaelogical resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene sel-seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first building permit for the property.
Materials will be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and
records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
Attachments:
1. Staff Report for the Meeting of June 17, 1999
2. Minutes of the HPC meeting of June 17, 1999
3. Phase II Archaeological Site Assessment for the Villa La Quinta Project, City of
La Quinta, Riverside County, California
Prepared by:
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
U17
p:Astm\hpcAhpc rptph 2 sp 03-065.wpd.wpd