2004 05 20 HPCG D
yFG� A9w5� 09mro
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
of rKti
AG EN DA
The Regular Meeting to be held in the Session Room at the
La Quinta City Hall, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California
MAY 20, 2004
3:00 P.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2004-007
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Historic Preservation
Commission on matters relating to historic resources within the City of La Quinta
which are not Agenda items. When addressing the Historic Preservation
Commission, please state your name and address and when discussing matters
pertaining to prehistoric sites, do not disclose the exact location of the site(s) for
their protection.
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA
VD 8167►11-1:101k
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meeting of April 15, 2004
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Paleontological Resources Assessment Report for Tentative Tract Map
32072;
Applicant: RJT Homes
Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH
Location: Southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52.
B. Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852;
Applicant: Ehline Company
Archaeological Consultant: L & L Environmental, Inc.
Location: Northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 52.
C. Phase I Archaeological Survey Report for Tentative Tract Map 31087;
Applicant: Tahiti Partners
Archaeological Consultant: L & L Environmental, Inc.
Location: South side of Darby Road, east of Washington Street.
D. Interim Phase II Cultural Archaeological Test Program for Tentative Tract Map
32201;
Applicant: Choice Enterprise
Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group
Location: Northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60
E. A Cultural Resources Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch Project Area
(Tentative Tract Map 31348);
Applicant: Madison Development
Archaeological Consultant: McKenna et at
Location: 46-201 Washington Street, located on the west side of
Washington Street, approximately 300 feet south of Highway 1 1 1
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
Vill. ADJOURNMENT
002
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A Regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
April 22, 2004
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by
Chairperson Leslie Mouriquand at 3:03 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for
the roll call.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call.
Present: Commissioners Puente, Sharp, Wilbur, Wright, and
Chairperson Mouriquand
Staff Present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Principal
Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn
Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright and Sharp to
approve minutes of the March 25, 2004, Historic Preservation
Commission as submitted. Unanimously approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract Map
32201
Applicant: Choice Enterprise
Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group
Location: Northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
P:\CAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 4-22-04.doc 003
Last printed 5/11/04 8:32 AM
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
2. Commissioner Sharp said he appreciated the fact the: report
included acknowledgement of the Torres Martinez and
Augustine Tribes. He asked if the project was within their
territory or historical boundaries.
3. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the report recognized the
traditional tribal boundaries, but not the current reservation
boundaries. The new tribal policies were acknowledged in this
report including the inclusion of a Native American as part of
the monitoring crew.
4. Commissioner Wright recommended staff provide a reminder to
the Tribes when it is appropriate to monitor.
5. Chairperson Mouriquand added the need for a tribal
representative could be included in the Conditions of Approval
for a grading permit.
6. Applicant's representative, Dave Saccullo, 74-923 Highway
1 1 1, Suite 114, Indian Wells, California, was introduced and
gave an overview of how the project would be handled. He
asked if he could submit an interim Phase II report, at a later
date, to enable him to begin clearing and grubbing the property.
7. Commissioner Sharp asked at what point during the (Phase II
report did Mr. Saccullo want to begin grubbing.
8. Chairperson Mouriquand replied they would have to complete
the Phase II work and present an interim letter report of the
findings before this could be considered. Mr. Saccullo replied
he would like to pursue this so he could go ahead with the
clearing and grubbing of the land.
9. Chairperson Mouriquand asked what staff's position was on
accepting interim reports. Staff replied this was not a standard
procedure. The applicant would have to provide adequate
information to justify the granting of a clearing and grubbing
permit. This type of request is usually done on a case -by -case
basis and is not commonly accepted. Staff added the Phase I
report makes it clear a Phase II is needed as well as monitoring
of the grading.
004-
2
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
10. Commissioner Wright commented on the Rancho La Quinta
(Coral Option) clearing and grubbing permit process and
expressed his concern on the need for monitoring.
11. Mr. Saccullo explained his main concern was with removal of a
row of Tamarisks and he did not wish to move, or disturb, any
other areas during that procedure. He emphasized there would
be no rough grading.
12. Chairperson Mouriquand commented Tamarisks leave large
holes when removed. She suggested it would be a good idea to
have a monitor to spot check the tree removal. It would be a
great opportunity to do some inspections. Mr. Saccullo agreed.
13. Commissioner Wright said it would be great to have a Native
American on -site in case any burial items were found.
14. Mr. Saccullo asked if there was anything he needed to do to
facilitate the Native American monitoring. Chairperson
Mouriquand replied he could check with his project
archaeologist who would coordinate with the Tribe's Cultural
Resource Representative (Gary Resvoloso).
15. Chairperson Mouriquand suggested the applicant have the Tribe
sign off on the interim report. Staff replied they would not
authorize grubbing if there was anything questionable in the
report. If there is nothing of substance, staff will then check
with any other parties involved.
16. Commissioner Wilbur said the report states very clearly, on
Page 16, what is possible. Staff acknowledged this was
correct.
17. Chairperson Mouriquand said the area surrounding this project
has had a lot of archaeological work recently and has proven to
be a hot spot for research. The research is helping to make
connections to the old Toro Village site and it is important to
continue monitoring.
18. Commissioner Puente mentioned Page 14 stated some of the
specimens were not collected and asked why.
Dos
3
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
19. Chairperson Mouriquand replied artifacts were usually left until
Phase II is completed unless they were in imminent danger.
Normally artifacts would be left until mitigation is completed.
The specimens will then be collected and a detailed map will be
done.
20. Mr. Saccullo commented he was documenting the progress of
the development through photos.
21. Commissioner Sharp asked how large the development was.
Mr. Saccullo replied it was a seven acre development, which
would include homes in the price range of $700,000 to
$1,000,000.
22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright and
Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2004-006 accepting the Phase I
Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract Map 32201,
subject to conditions. Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
A. Commissioner Mouriquand distributed the cover sheet to staff on the
"Inventory, Analysis and National Register Evaluation of two rock art
sites at Coral Mountain" which was submitted to the Bureau of
Reclamation by Daniel F. McCarthy and Leslie J. Mouriquand.
B. Commissioner Sharp asked if Gary Resvoloso's presentation had been
rescheduled. Staff replied they were working on it.
C. Commissioner Puente asked if the Tour Meeting of Sunday, May 16`h
was still going to be held. Chairperson Mouriquand replied she had
clearance from the Bureau of Reclamation, but was waiting for further
approvals. Staff noted the meeting would have to be noticed.
D. Commissioner Wright stated the Historic Preservation Commission has
been in existence for 10 years this May. He expressed his thanks to
Leslie Mouriquand, Ned Millis, Terry Henderson, Maria Puente, and
Drew Pallette, who attended the first meeting. Chairperson
Mouriquand was originally an Associate Planner and staff member
assigned to the Commission. Commissioner Wright commended her
006 4
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
on all the hard work she had done to get the Commission going in the
right direction. He commented on some of the Commission's
accomplishments and mentioned it would be nice to have some
recognition, such as a plaque somewhere in the City.
Chairperson Mouriquand said May was "Historic Preservation Month"
and thought it would be a good time to recognize the Commission's
accomplishments and commend the City for leading the Valley in
Historic Preservation. She suggested a ten-year retrospective, and a
press release that focused on the Commission's achievements.
Commissioner Sharp asked if all the Valley cities had Preservation
Commissions. Chairperson Mouriquand replied no other city has the
designation of a Certified Local Government. This means the
Commission is certified by the National Parks Service and thie State
Historic Preservation Office. It is a special certification the
Commission worked very hard to get. Commissioner Wright
confirmed it took a lot of hard work to get the designation and
commended Chairperson Mouriquand for her past contribution to
attain that goal.
Commissioner Wright pointed out that in the last ten years a lot of
artifacts and buildings have been saved by the intervention of the
Historic Preservation Commission.
Staff summarized the Commissioners' requests as: 11 check into
commemoration by plaque, 2) discuss a Press Release with the City
Administrative Offices, and 3) prepare a list of achievements of the
Commission.
E. Chairperson Mouriquand stated she is part of a movement lobbying
the County to fill the Archaeologist position that has been vacant for
20 years. Many artifacts and historic buildings have been lost in that
time. Her group will be meeting with the Board of Supervisors to get
them to consider filling this vacancy. Listing the accomplishments of
the City of La Quinta would be a good example of what a small group
can do to help save the history of the Valley.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wright and Wilbur to adjourn this Regular Meeting of the
007 s
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
Historic Preservation Commission to the next Meeting to be held on May 20,
2004. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was
adjourned at 3:32 p.m. Unanimously approved.
Submitted by:
Carolyn Walker
Secretary
12
BI #A
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 20, 2004
ITEM: PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 32072
LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 52,
(ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 772-410-021 AND -022)
APPLICANT: RJT HOMES (CHAD MEYER)
PALEONTOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT: CRM TECH (HARRY M. QUINN, GEOLOGIST/PALEONTOLOGIST)
BACKGROUND:
The study area is a 15± acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Jefferson
Street and Avenue 52. The City is currently processing applications to allow a 145-
unit residential development on the property. A Phase I (survey level) paleontological
resources assessment has been completed for the property for a previously proposed
project. The assessment includes a paleological resources record search and field
reconnaissance of the property. This assessment will be part of the environmental
review required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the project
applications.
The study area is located at approximately 20 to 30 feet above mean sea level and
was previously covered with water during the high stands of ancient Lake Cahuilla (at
maximum 42 feet above mean sea level).
A temporary bank building occupies part of the frontage along Avenue 52. Piles of
gravel, asphalt and dirt are situated near the center of the study area. The site has
been leveled in the past for agricultural purposes.
DISCUSSION:
A paleological records search for the property was conducted at the San Bernardino
County Museum and Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The: records
search indicated the area contains lake and fluvial sediments known as Lake Cahuilla
beds, but no Pleistocene -age sites have been recorded in the vicinity of the study
area.
The on -foot field survey of the study area found scattered whole and broken shells of
Physa, Tryonia, Gyraulus and Anodonta species. These are the common forms of
009
P:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 32072 paleo.doc
mollusks found in the ancient Lake Cahuilla sediments. The report concludes the
study areas ancient lake beds have a low to moderate potential for vertebrate fossil
remains but a high potential for invertebrate remains. Because of this fact,
Paleontological monitoring of earth -moving activities is warranted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2004- , accepting the "Paleontological Resources
Assessment Report for Assessor's Parcel Nos. 772-410-021 and -022 in the City of
La Quinta Riverside County, California", as prepared and recommended by CRM
TECH, and subject to the following conditions:
1. On- and off -site monitoring of earth -moving and grading in areas identified as
likely to contain paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified
paleontological monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as
they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of
sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and
vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert
equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Proof that a
monitor has been retained shall be given to City prior to issuance of first earth -
moving permit, or before any clearing of the site is begun.
2. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and
permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small
invertebrates and vertebrates.
3. A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens shall be
submitted to the City prior to the first occupancy of a residence being granted
by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions of the significance of
all recovered resources where appropriate. The report and inventory, when
submitted will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to
paleontological resources.
4. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City.
Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall comply with standards commonly
used in the paleontological industry.
01.0
pl\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 32072 paleo.doc
Attachment:
1 . Paleontological Resources Assessment Report for Assessor's Parcel Nos. 772-
410-021 and -022 in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California
(Commissioners only)
Prepared by:
-5 w '54AI,f-A
Stan Sawa, Principal Planner
oil
pl\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 32072 paleo.doc
DATE:
10 xPAI
LOCATION:
U;1U41N_T1W
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT:
BACKGROUND:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 20, 2004
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL 'SURVEY
REPORT ON TRACT 31852, ±8 ACRES
NORTHWEST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND
AVENUE52
EHLINE COMPANY
L&L ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (LESLIE NAY IRISH,
PRINCIPAL)
The property is a rectangular 8-acre parcel in south La Quinta on the northwest
corner of Madison Street and Avenue 52. The parcel is vacant but had been used for
agricultural purposes (date palm grove). A Phase I (survey level) archaeological and
paleontological assessment has been completed for the Tentative Tract map
application that is being processed by the City. This study will be part of the
Environmental Assessment required by the California Environmental Quality Act for
the project application.
The assessment includes a records search and field reconnaissance of the property,
along with archival research. The archaeological and paleontological assessments
were conducted independently, but have been included together in the same
document.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCUSSION:
An archaeological records search for the property was conducted at the Eastern
Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS)
at UC Riverside. The records search indicated that the study area had riot been
previously surveyed for cultural resources. Within a one -mile radius of the property
two historic isolates, one historic canal, 43 prehistoric isolates and 38 prehistoric
archaeological sites have been recorded from a total of 15 previous surveys.
An archival search was conducted at CHRIS and the California Office of Historic
Preservation Directory of Historic Properties, the National Register of Historic: Places,
California State Historic Landmarks, the California Points of Historic Interest List,
p:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 31852.doc
1 012
Historic maps covering modern La Quinta, topographic quadrangles and other
reference materials. The search did not show any cultural activity in the study area.
Notification of this assessment was given to the Native American Heritage
Commission. Additionally, a letter requesting comments on the project was sent to
the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians. No comments were received from either group.
In conclusion, the records search and background research led to the conclusion that
the study area is in a location that is highly sensitive for prehistoric and historic
resources.
The field survey conducted by L&L archaeologists consisted of systematically walking
over the site at 10-meter intervals and visually observing the site for artifacts. As a
result of the survey a single brownware pottery shard was found. Due to the highly
disturbed nature of the area where the shard was found, the report states there is a
strong possibility it was not resting in its original location. The possibility of finding
buried archaeological resources is there because of the high sensitivity for prehistoric
resources in the area. Therefore, archaeological monitoring of all brush clearing,
grubbing, trenching and earth -moving activities is recommended in the report under
the supervision of a Registered Professional Archaeologist.
PALEONTOLOGICAL DISCUSSION:
The study area is located in an area between 0 and 10 feet above mean sea level.
This means the site is located within the remnants of the prehistoric Lake Cahuilla
(maximum 42 feet above mean sea level) and has been under water in the past.
Therefore, the report includes a paleontological assessment of the study area.
A records search was conducted at the San Bernardino County Museum .and San
Diego Natural History Museum. The search found that neither the site nor the
surrounding areas had any recorded fossil localities.
The field survey conducted by L&L paleontologists found shells of freshwater snails
and clams in deflated areas. These were determined to be from the last documented
high-water stand of ancient Lake Cahuilla around 1540, and as such, are not
considered fossils (generally at least 10,000 years old). However, the potential for
the study area to yield significant paleontological specimens exists. Therefore,
monitoring of all brush clearing, grubbing, trenching and earth -moving activities is
recommended in the report under the supervision of a Registered Professional
paleontologist.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2004- , accepting the Phase I Archeological and
Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852, ±8 Acres as prepared by L&L
p:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 31852.doc 013
Environmental, Inc., subject to the recommendations in the report and following
conditions:
1 . The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading
by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be
given to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of first
earth -moving or clearing permit.
2. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
3. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the
property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes
and records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
4. On- and off -site monitoring in areas identified as likely to contain
paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified paleontological
monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are
unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments
that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and
vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert
equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Proof that a
monitor has been retained shall be given to City prior to issuance of first earth -
moving permit, or before any clearing of the site is begun.
5. Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and
permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small
invertebrates and vertebrates.
6. A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens shall be
submitted to the City prior to the first occupancy of a residence being granted
by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions of the significance of
all recovered resources where appropriate. The report and inventory, when
submitted will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to
paleontological resources.
7. Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City.
Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall comply with standards commonly
used in the paleontological industry.
pl\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 'I tt 31852. doc 014
Attachment:
Phase I Archeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31852, ±8
Acres (Commissioners only)
Prepared by:
,-SAAAJ7
Stan B. Sawa, Principal Planner
UI j
pl\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 1 tt 31852.doc
BI #C
DATE:
ITEM:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT:
BACKGROUND:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 20, 2004
PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 31087
SOUTH SIDE OF DARBY ROAD, EAST OF WASHINGTON
STREET AND PALM ROYALE DRIVE
TAHITI PARTNERS
L&L ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. (LESLIE NAY IRISH,
PRINCIPAL)
The property is a rectangular 5-acre parcel in north La Quinta on Darby Road and
proposed to be subdivided and annexed into the City. The parcel is vacant but
appears to have been used for ranching, dumping and off -road vehicles in the past. A
Phase I (survey level) archaeological assessment has been completed for the property
for a pre -annexation Tentative Tract map application that is being processed by the
City. This study will be part of the Environmental Assessment required by the
California Environmental Quality Act for the project application.
The assessment includes a records search and field reconnaissance of the property,
along with archival research.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCUSSION:
An archaeological records search for the property was conducted at the Eastern
Information Center at UC Riverside. The records search indicated that the study area
had not been previously surveyed for cultural resources.
An archival search was conducted at the Eastern Information Center at UC Riverside
and the California Office of Historic Preservation Directory of Historic Properties, the
National Register of Historic Places, California State Historic Landmarks, the California
Points of Historic Interest List, Historic maps covering modern La Quinta, topographic
quadrangles and other reference materials. The search did not show any cultural
activity in the study area.
Within a one -mile radius of the property three historic wells/foundations, one historic
highway and trail, 10 prehistoric isolates, two prehistoric ceramic scatters and one
p:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt tt 31087 ph I.doc
U2o
prehistoric archaeological site have been recorded from a total of 36 previous
surveys.
In conclusion, the records search and background research led to the conclusion that
the study area is in a location that is sensitive for prehistoric resources.
The field survey conducted by L&L archaeologists consisted of systematically walking
over the site at 5-meter intervals and visually observing the site for artifacts. As a
result of the survey no prehistoric materials were found. The possibility of finding
buried archaeological resources is there because of the sensitivity for prehistoric
resources in the area. Therefore, archaeological monitoring of all brush clearing,
grubbing, trenching and earth -moving activities is recommended in the report under
the supervision of a Registered Professional Archaeologist.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2004- , accepting the Phase I Archeological SurveyReport
eport
on the 5-acres, ±8 Acres as prepared by L&L Environmental, Inc., subject to the
recommendations in the report and following conditions:
1 . The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading
by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be
given to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of first
earth -moving or clearing permit.
2. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
3. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the
property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes
and records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
Attachment:
1 . Phase I Archeological and Paleontological Survey Report on Tract 31'852, ±8
Acres (Commissioners only)
Prepared by:
e G4A4 7n
Stan Sawa, Principal Planner
p:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt tt 31087 ph Ldoc
017
BI #D
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 20, 2004
ITEM: INTERIM PHASE II CULTURAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST
PROGRAM FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32201
LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND
AVENUE 60
APPLICANT: CHOICE ENTERPRISE.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ADVISORY GROUP (JAMES BROCK,
PRINCIPAL)
BACKGROUND:
On April 22, 2004 the Historic Preservation Commission accepted a Phase I cultural
resources report for this 7.76-acre property (Attachment 1). That report found two
prehistoric sites, CA-RIV-7415 (Primary No. 33-13314) and CA-RIV-7416 (Primary
No. 33-13316) during the field reconnaissance, along with three isolated pottery
sherds. CA-RIV-7415 consisted of four pottery sherds, a mano fragment, a metate
fragment, and a piece of thermally affected clay found on the ground surface. CA-
RIV-7416 consisted of two deposits of thermally affected clay, 16+ sherds and
scattered fragments of thermally affected clay. The phase I staff report contains
details regarding the property (Attachment 2).
A Phase II (testing) cultural resources assessment has been completed and submitted.
The report is an interim report (temporary), due to the applicant's desire to process
his Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map applications as quickly as
possible. The results of this Phase II testing will be part of the Environmental
Assessment required by the California Environmental Quality Act for the project
application.
DISCUSSION:
The Phase I report stated the two prehistoric sites are potentially resources that
required a Phase II testing programs to determine their significance. As noted in the
Phase II report, artifacts on the surface were collected at both sites. In addition,
several one -by -one meter units were excavated from 30 to 40 centimeters deep.
Additionally, posthole excavations in the original units were dug to at least 100
centimeters deep.
p[\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 11 tt 32201.doc •- 018
At CA-RIV-7415 no prehistoric materials were recovered. There was some modern
refuse found. At CA-RIV-7416 a single debitage fragment and a pottery sherd was
recovered in separate excavations.
The conclusion of the Phase II report is that both prehistoric sites had very light
prehistoric use and, as such, can be considered insignificant under applicable criteria
and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. As noted in the Phase
I staff report (Attachment 2) the area has a high sensitivity for prehistoric resources.
Therefore, monitoring of on- and off -site rough grading and major trenching should be
required under the supervision of a Registered Professional Archaeologist, or
equivalent. Archaeological Advisory Group indicates the final report on the Phase II
test excavation should be completed within approximately two months.
CONCLUSION:
Staff believes this interim report is acceptable provided the final Phase II report is
submitted and accepted by the Historic Preservation Commission prior to approval of
the final tract map for the subdivision of the lots.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2004- , accepting the Phase II Archaeological Test Program
for Tentative Tract No. 32201, as prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Final Phase II report shall be submitted and accepted by the Historic
Preservation Commission prior to approval of the final tract map for the
subdivision of the lots.
2. The site shall be monitored during on and off -site trenching and rough grading
by qualified archaeological monitors including a Native American monitor.
Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the Community Development
and Public Works Departments prior to issuance of first earth -moving or
clearing permit.
3. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy for the project.
4. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long term
curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all
within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and
delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the
o i c�
p[\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 11 tt 32201.doc
property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, fiend notes
and records, primary research data, and the original graphics.
Attachments:
1 . Excerpt from minutes of April 22, 2004 HPC meeting
2. Phase 11 Archaeological Test Program for TT 32201, Northwest corner of
Madison Street and Avenue 60, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California
(Commissioners only)
Prepared by:
c GSAA
Stan Sawa, Principal Planner
U2 0
p[\stan\hpc\hpc rpt ph 11 tt 32201.doc
ATTACHMENT 1
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A Regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
April 22, 2004
his meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by
C irperson Leslie Mouriquand at 3:03 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for
the Nil call.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. edge of Allegiance.
B. RdCall.
Present: Commissioners Puente, Sharp, Wilbur, Wright, and
Chairperson Mouriquand
Sta Present: Planning Manager Oscar Orci, Principal
Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn
Walker.
ll. PUBLIC COMMENT: one
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. It was moved and seconde by Commissioners Wright and Sharp to
approve minutes of the Ma ch 25, 2004, Historic Preservation
Commission as submitted. Unan ously approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract Map
32201
Applicant: Choice Enterprise
Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group
Location: Northwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60
Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information
contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the
Community Development Department.
P:\CAROLYN\Hist Pres Com\HPC 4-22-04.doc 021
Last printed 5/14/04 10:20 AM
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
2, Commissioner Sharp said he appreciated the fact the report
included acknowledgement of the Torres Martinez and
Augustine Tribes. He asked if the project was within their
territory or historical boundaries.
3. Chairperson Mouriquand replied the report recognized the
traditional tribal boundaries, but not the current reservation
boundaries. The new tribal policies were acknowledged in this
report including the inclusion of a Native American as part of
the monitoring crew.
4. Commissioner Wright recommended staff provide a reminder to
the Tribes when it is appropriate to monitor.
5. Chairperson Mouriquand added the need for a tribal
representative could be included in the Conditions of Approval
for a grading permit.
6. Applicant's representative, Dave Saccullo, 74-923 Highway
111, Suite 114, Indian Wells, California, was introduced and
gave an overview of how the project would be handled. He
asked if he could submit an interim Phase II report, at a later
date, to enable him to begin clearing and grubbing the property.
7. Commissioner Sharp asked at what point during the Phase II
report did Mr. Saccullo want to begin grubbing.
8. Chairperson Mouriquand replied they would have to complete
the Phase II work and present an interim letter report of the
findings before this could be considered. Mr. Saccullo replied
he would like to pursue this so he could go ahead with the
clearing and grubbing of the land.
9. Chairperson Mouriquand asked what staff's position was on
accepting interim reports. Staff replied this was not a standard
procedure. The applicant would have to provide adequate
information to justify the granting of a clearing and grubbing
permit. This type of request is usually done on a case -by -case
basis and is not commonly accepted. Staff added the Phase I
report makes it clear a Phase II is needed as well as monitoring
of the grading.
r)�2 2
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
10. Commissioner Wright commented on the Rancho La Quinta
(Coral Option) clearing and grubbing permit process and
expressed his concern on the need for monitoring.
11. Mr. Saccullo explained his main concern was with removal of a
row of Tamarisks and he did not wish to move, or disturb, any
other areas during that procedure. He emphasized there would
be no rough grading.
12. Chairperson Mouriquand commented Tamarisks leave large
holes when removed. She suggested it would be a good idea to
have a monitor to spot check the tree removal. It would be a
great opportunity to do some inspections. Mr. Saccullo agreed.
13. Commissioner Wright said it would be great to have a Native
American on -site in case any burial items were found.
14. Mr. Saccullo asked if there was anything he needed to do to
facilitate the Native American monitoring. Chairperson
Mouriquand replied he could check with his project
archaeologist who would coordinate with the Tribe's Cultural
Resource Representative (Gary Resvoloso).
15. Chairperson Mouriquand suggested the applicant have the Tribe
sign off on the interim report. Staff replied they would not
authorize grubbing if there was anything questionable in the
report. If there is nothing of substance, staff will then check
with any other parties involved.
16. Commissioner Wilbur said the report states very clearly, on
Page 16, what is possible. Staff acknowledged this was
correct.
17. Chairperson Mouriquand said the area surrounding this project
has had a lot of archaeological work recently and has proven to
be a hot spot for research. The research is helping to make
connections to the old Toro Village site and it is important to
continue monitoring.
18. Commissioner Puente mentioned Page 14 stated some of the
specimens were not collected and asked why.
a'%3 3
Historic Preservation Commission
April 22, 2004
19. Chairperson Mouriquand replied artifacts were usually left until
Phase II is completed unless they were in imminent danger.
Normally artifacts would be left until mitigation is completed.
The specimens will then be collected and a detailed map will be
done.
20. Mr. Saccullo commented he was documenting the progress of
the development through photos.
21. Commissioner Sharp asked how large the development was.
Mr. Saccullo replied it was a seven acre development, which
would include homes in the price range of $700,000 to
$1,000,000.
22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright and
Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2004-006 accepting the Phase I
Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Tract Map 32201,
subject to conditions. Unanimously approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
A. Commissioner Mouriquand distributed the cover sheet to staff on the
"Inventory, Analysis and National Register Evaluation of two rock art
sites at Coral Mountain" which was submitted to the Bureau of
Reclamation by Daniel F. McCarthy and Leslie J. Mouriquand.
B. Commissioner Sharp asked if Gary Resvoloso's presentation had been
rescheduled. Staff replied they were working on it.
C. Commissioner Puente asked if the Tour Meeting of Sunday, May 16`h
was still going to be held. Chairperson Mouriquand replied she had
clearance from the Bureau of Reclamation, but was waiting for further
approvals. Staff noted the meeting would have to be noticed.
D. Commissioner Wright stated the Historic Preservation Commission has
been in existence for 10 years this May. He expressed his thanks to
Leslie Mouriquand, Ned Millis, Terry Henderson, Maria Puente, and
Drew Pallette, who attended the first meeting. Chairperson
Mouriquand was originally an Associate Planner and staff member
assigned to the Commission. Commissioner Wright commended her
024 4
BI #E
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 20, 2004
ITEM: A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATION OF THE POINT
HAPPY RANCH PROJECT AREA (TENTATIVE TRACT 31348)
LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET, APPROXIMATELY 300
FEET SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 111 (46201 WASHINGTON
STREET)
APPLICANT: MADISON DEVELOPMENT
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
CONSULTANT: MC KENNA ET AL (JEANETTE A. MC KENNA, PRINCIPAL)
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract 31348 for Point Happy Ranch was approved with mitigation
measures for cultural resources. The applicant was required to prepare an
addendum report to include historic aspects as the relationship to the Bradshaw
Trail, the stage coach line, the water wells and prehistoric Indian villages and
trails. Additionally, an oral history of the Point Happy Ranch was required.
McKENNA et al has submitted the addendum report as required. The report
discusses the relationship of the property to the historic Bradshaw Trail and the
founding and development of Point Happy Ranch by early white settlers. In
addition to discussing the historic issues, the report includes a verbatim transcript
of an audio interview with Louise Neeley at her residence about her years at Point
Happy Ranch and a Point Happy Ranch video field visit with Mrs. Neeley. These
conversations consist of 3.5 hours of discussion. McKENNA et al and the
applicants will be at the meeting to discuss the preparation and findings of the
report.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review the submitted report and adopt Minute Motion 2004- , accepting "A Cultural
Resources Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch Project Area in the City of La Quinta,
Riverside County, California"
025
P:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt tt 31348 addendum rpt.doc
Attachment:
1. A Cultural Resources Investigation of the Point Happy Ranch Project Area in the
City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California
Prepared by:
Stan Sawa, Principal Planner
►ib
P:\stan\hpc\hpc rpt tt 31348 addendum rpt.doc