PCRES 1995-001RESOLUTION 95-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION
OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 94-290
PREPARED FOR PLOT PLAN 94-545
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 94-290
SIMON CHAN
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did on the 31st day of January, 1995, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to
consider the proposed Plot Plan 94-545 - Shangri La Oriental Restaurant project; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did approve a recommendation for certification of the Environmental Assessment
to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan has complied with the requirements of the
"The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended)
(Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community
Development Department has prepared Initial Study EA 94-290; and,
WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission
did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said
Environmental Assessment:
1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare
of the community, either indirectly or indirectly.
2. The proposed commercial restaurant will not have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
3. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term
environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
4. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or
cumulatively considerable.
RESOPC108
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the
Commission for this environmental assessment.
2. That it does hereby recommend certification of Environmental Assessment 94-290
for the reasons set forth in this resolution and as stated in the attached
environmental assessment checklist and addendum, labeled Exhibit "A".
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 31st day of January, 1995, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Abels, Anderson, Barrows, Butler, Newkirk, and Chairman
Adolph
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Gardner
ABSTAIN: None
DONALD AbOLP14, Chairman
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
Director
RFSOPC-108
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Environmental Assessment No. qY-190
Case No. Ep y y Sys Date Dec e,. b er o?a i 4 g V
Name of Proponent S try
Phone 3 9 7— 7 7 I -j
Agency Requiring Checklist
Project Name (if applicable)
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Community Development Department
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
n7'
IL ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless
Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use and Planning
Population and Housing
Earth Resources
Water
Air Quality
III. DETERMINATION.
Transportation/Circulation
XBiological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
Risk of Upset and Human Health
Noise
Mandatory Findings of Significance
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
Public Services
Utilities
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
LiRecreation
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least,
1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a " potentially significant impact" or "potential
significant unless mitigated. " AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requited, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
Printed Name and Title
For C i � v �14 :Z u T n a
��—
t
Pb 1'
S*Wft= to rti
rbWla.
hmp-
U ba 3 0
MWOMd t*=
Pb
bmp-
3J. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a)
Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(source /(s):
b)
Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
the project?
c)
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
1/
d)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)?
3.2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a)
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b)
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)?
c)
Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
w^(
3.3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a)
Fault rupture?
b)
Seismic ground shaking
c)
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
x'
d)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e)
Landslides or mudflows?
x
. f)
Erosion, changes in lotto¢ranhv or unctahl, coil
conaluons trom excavation, grading or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? 01
h) Expansive soils? M
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
fill
hrWry
Z*Wfkm tr rlr
rid
Wa
UWr npb.
MWP" bm-
Mn
Iff"a
3.4. WATER. Would the project result in:
a)
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
b)
Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
c)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
d)
Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
may?
t/
e)
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements?
f)
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
t/
g)
Altered direction or rate of glow of groundwater?
µ
j✓
h)
Impacts to groundwater quality?
3.5. Alit
QUALITY. Would the project:
a)
Violate any air quality standard to contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violations?
b)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
IX
c)
Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change m climate?
/
d)
Create objectional odors?;
111
powwoft
P-Ok"
S18WkW Lr T%M
3*06—
Ue sowftw
me
IMF-
MWVMd WV-
bw-
i.6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the project
result in:
a)
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b)
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g. farm equipment)?
c)
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
d)
Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f)
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g)
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
3.7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rate species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds?
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
C) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
iv
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
3.8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
project:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
3.9. RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH.
Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited to:
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazards?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
3.10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
3.11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
h Wly
r .Wly
sig.dk a Isu Th.n
S'.ir.
UN sq.6.
W
Inman
Mvipued Inman
Iny'ct
V
V
Y
v
14sY11�
rw wly
34Mtkas it TV.
Sp11a0
uir swwf u-
Pb
b)
Police protection?
c)
Schools?
d)
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
t✓
e)
Other governmental services?
✓
3.12. UTQdTIE,S.
Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alternations to the following utilities:
a)
Power or natural gas?
b)
Communications systems?
c)
Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d)
Sewer or septic tanks?
t/
e)
Storm water drainage?
f)
Solid waste disposal?
3.13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a)
Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?/
b)
Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c)
Create light or glare?
3.14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a)
Disturb paleontological resources?
�/
_•
b)
Disturb archaeological resources?
c)
Affect historical resources?
/
d)
Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
tl
e)
Restrict existing religious of sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
12
Pb Wty
ft-wty
S*Wk ft Lr rlu
swdk=
Urr npinoa H.
W*W
MbPm tvpn 11V4
315. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a)
Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks of other recreational facilities?
b)
Affect existing recreational opportunities?
4. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a)
Does the project have the Potential to degrade the
quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminar�
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b)
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
c)
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
('Cumulatively considerable' means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects).
d)
Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are 'potentially significant' or 'potentially significant
unless mitigated,' describe the mitigation treasures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
vtt
INITIAL STUDY
(EA 94-290)
for the
SHANGRI LA ORIENTAL RESTAURANT
COMMERCIAL PLOT PLAN 94-545
in
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by:
City of La Quints
Community Development Department
78-495 Calle Tampico
LaQuinta, California 92253
December 22, 1994
TABLE OF CONTENTS
_Section
Page
I INTRODUCTION 3
2
3
4
5
1.1 Overview of the Proposed Project............................................................. 3
1.2 Purpose of Initial Study.............................................................................. 3
1.3 Background of Environmental Review ...................................................... 4
1.4 Summary of Preliminary Environmental Assessment ................................ 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4
2.1 Project Location and Environmental Setting ............................................... 4
2.2 Physical Characteristics of Proposed Project ............................................... 4
2.3 Operational Characteristics of Proposed Project _ ............................ ............4
2.4 Objectives of the Project...............................................................................4
2.5 Discretionary Actions........................................................................ ...... 5
2.6 Related Projects ................... ..................................... .......................... 5
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5
3.1
Land Use and Planning................................................................................6
3.2
Population and Housing...............................................................................7
3.3
Earth Resources...........................................................................................9
3.4
Water...........................................................................................................11
3.5
Air Quality ...................................................................................................13
3.6
Transportation/Circufation..........................................................................14
3.7
Biological Resources ..... ..........................................................................
16
3.8
Energy and Mineral Resources....................................................................18
3.9
Risk of Upset/Human Health.......................................................................19
3.10
Noise............................................................................................................
20
3.11
Public Services.............................................................................................21
3.12
Utilities........................................................................................................
22
3.13
Aesthetics.....................................................................................................24
3.14
Cultural Resources .............................................
.................................25
3.15
Recreation...................................................................................................27
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 27
EARLIER ANALYSIS 28
2
SECTION I: INTRODUCTION
1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
The purpose of this Initial Study is to identify the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Shangri
La Oriental Restaurant. The proposed project site is located within the I l l-La Quinta Commercial Center,
located on thenorth side of tEghway 111, between Washington Street and Adams Street.
The site consists of one designated pad of land within a planned shopping center. The development
envisioned for this project includes a 5,040 square foot restaurant building featuring a cantilevered overhang
to create a pedestrian walkwayon a portion of a 14.3 acre site.
The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency for the project, as defrried by Section 21067 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Lead Agency is the public agency which has the principal
responsibility for carrying out or approving a project which may have a significant effect upon the
environment. The City of La Quetta, as the Lead Agency, has the authority to oversee the environmental
review and to approve the proposed development.
11 PURPOSE OF INITIAL STUDY
As part of the environmental review for the Shangn La restaurant, the City of La Quinta Community
Development Department has prepared this Initial Study This Initial Study provides a basis for determining
the nature and scope of the subsequent environmental review for the proposed restaurant The purposes of
the Initial Study, as stated in Section 15063 of the CEQA Cnridelines, include the following:
To provide the City of La Quinta with information to use as the basis for deciding whether prepare
an environmental impact report (EIR) or negative declaration for the restaurant,
To enable the applicant or the Citv of La Quinta to modifv the project, mitigating adverse acts
before and EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for a mitigated negative
declaration;
To assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is required, by focusing the analysis on those issues that
will be adversely impacted by the proposed project:
To facilitate environmental review early in the design of the project;
To provide documentation for the findings in a negative declaration that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment;
To eliminate unnecessary environmental impact reports; and
To determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project.
1.3 BACKGROUND OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On December 5, 1994, an application for approval of a restaurant building was submitted by Simon Chan.
The proposed project will be located on State Highway 11 I, between Washington Street and Adams Street.
Following this submitteL the City prepared an Initial Study, of which this addendum document is a part.
1.4 SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The Initial Study for the proposed Shangi La Oriental Restaurant indicates that there is a potential for
adverse environmental impacts on the issue areas. Mitigation meautres have been recommended to reduce
potential impacts to insignificant levels. As a result, a negative declaration of environmental impact will be
recommended for this project. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will not be necessary.
SECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of La Quima is a 31 18 square mile city located in the southwestem portion of the Coachella
Valley. The City is bounded by the City of Indian Wells on the weer_ City of Indio and Riverside County
on the east, Riverside County on the north, and federal lartds to the south The City of La Quima was
incorporated in 1982.
2.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed development will consist of a 0.7660 acre development. The structure will feature an early
California design consistent with the development standards of the City of La Quima- The proposed
landscaping will be enhanced The building will be a 5,040 square foot, cote -story structure. 18 feet in height.
2.3 OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The restaurant will be open for lunch and dinner. Access to the restaurant will be from the commercial
center parking lot which has direct access to Washington Street, Highway 111, and Adams Street.
2.4 OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The objectives the applicam intends to accomplish with the operation of the proposed restaurant is to
operate a profit -making enterprise that will provide a new service to residents of La Quima and the
surrounding area.
Through the discretionary and environmental review proms, the City Council will determine the nature and
extent of benefits and costs (including environmental ) of the Shang i La Oriental Restaurant to the City and
surrounding area. The City, through this process, will strive to achieve the following objectives:
• To promote development that will provide the City with maximum economic benefits
(reventte and employment); and
• To ensure that future development is responsible for contributing its' "fair slave" in terms of
infiattructure improvements and services required to mitigate potential adverse impacts
2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS
A discretionary action is an action taken by a government agency (for this project the government agency is
the City Council for the City of to Quinta) that calls for the exercise of judgment in deciding whether to
approve a project. The proposed restaurant will require the following specific discretionary approvals from
the La Quinta Planning Commission and La Quinta City Council:
Approval of Commercial Plot Plan- The proposed project will be required to obtain commercial plot
plan approval prior to submitting construction plans for building permits
The City of La Quinta will need to approve and certify the environmemal review process for the project.
2.6 RELATED PROJECTS
There are no related projects associated with this proposed project. The project is, however, within an
existing commercial center containing both vacant pad sites and developed stores and restaurants.
SECTION 3: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and subsequent
operation of the proposed Shangn La Restaurant The fifteen CEQA issue areas evaluated in this Initial
Study include the following:
• Land Use and Planning
• Population and Housing
• Earth Resources
• Water and Hydrology
• Air Quality
• Transportation/Circulation
• Biological Resources
• Energy/Mineral Resources
• Risk of Upset/Human Health
• Noise
• Public Services
• Utilities
• Aesthetics
• Cultural Resources
• Recreation
Under each issue, the environmental setting is discussed, including a desorption of conditions as they
presently exist within the City and the area affected by the proposed development project. Then, a series of
questions concerning the project's effects on the different environmental issues are listed. To each question,
there are fora possible responses:
• No Impact The proposed project will not have any measurable adverse environmental impacts.
• Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will have the potential for impacting the
environment, although this impact will be below thresholds that have been determined to be
significant.
• Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated. The proposed project will have impacts which
may exceed thresholds of significance, although mitigation measures or changes to the project will
reduce these impacts to acceptable levels.
• Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project will have impacts which are considered
significant and adverse and more detailed analysis is needed to identify mitigation measures that
may reduce these impacts. Findings related to a statement of overriding considerations is a likely
outcome of this review.
Thresholds for significance are defined either by standards adopted by responsible or trustee agencies or by
referring to criteria in CEQA (Appendix G)
3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Regional Environmental Seating
The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, which is located approximately 150 mites southeast
of Los Angeles and 90 miles west of the Colorado River. The valley is located in the eastern portion of
Riverside County The Coachella Valley is a part of the larger Colorado Desert and was formed by a
depression of the valley floor, caused by faulting in its early geologic history. This depression created a
natural trough between the surrounding mountain ranges which, throughout the ages, experienced episodic
inundations of sea water and fresh water The Salon Sea, which currently exists in the Salon Sink area of
the valley, is the latest of several inundations.
The valley is abundant with both plant and animal life and has topographical relief ranging from -237 foot below sera level
to about 9,000 feet aboi a sea level. The valley is swrondod by the San Jacinto, San Bernard=, Santa Rosa and
OrmWia maintains, and is bisected b% the San Andreas fault There is a average of 4 inches of rainfall amrualh, amd
summer to rperatur6 reach into the low I00's ff ): howno. the valleti has am alums bem this hot and do .
Appmxiniaicly 500.000 years ago the enure area was under water as the Gulf of Califomua over tended this
conternporan desert area
Local Enrvonmental.Ve ing
The proposed project site is located in the City of La Quuua, which is in eastern Riverside County. The City
is bounded by the City of Indian Wells to the west, City of Indio and Riverside County to the cast, Riverside
County to the north, and fed" lands to the south. More particularly, the project site is located in the
northern portion of the City on a 0.76 acre pad that is a part of a larger, previously approved, development
project The Assessor's Parcel Number is 643-080-003. To the south, across Highway 111, is an existing
auto dealership (Simon Motors). There is vacant land to the east of the center, a major arterial (Washington
Street) adjacent to the west of the commercial center, and State Highway 11 I adjacent to the south. The
closest residential development is located approximately 1,000 feet to the southwest, and 2,500 feet to the
north, of the project site.
A Would the project conflict with the general plan designation or zoning?
No InapacL The site is zoned C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) in the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance and
is designated as Mixed/Regional Commercial (M/RC) in the La Quinta General Plan The entire area
adjacent on the north side of State Highway I 11, between Washington Street and Jefferson Street. is
designated as Mixed/Regional Commercial, with the C-P-S zoning.
B. Would the project conflict with applicable environmental plats or policies adopted
by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
No Impact. The City of La Quinta has jurisdiction over the proposed project. The primary environmental
plans and policies related to development on site are identified in la Quirna's General Plan and the Master
Environmental Assessment for the City.
The project site is located within the La Quinta Redevelopment Area k2 which includes the majority of the
northern section of the City. The redevelopment plan for the area relies upon the General Plan to indicate the
location and extent of permitted development. As a result, the proposed project is not inconsistent with the
adopted Redevelopment Plan. The development envisioned for this project will not exceed the development
standards contained in the City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
C. Would the project affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils
or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
No Impact. No agricultural lands are located on or near the site. The La Quinta General Plan does not
contain an agricultural land use designation although there are remnant agricultural land uses extant in the
southeastern portion of the City There are no existing agricultural producing activities within or adjacent to
the proposed project site. Thus, no impact on agricultural resources or operations will result from the
proposed project.
The project site was improved and graded in 1991, by T.D.C. during the course of development of the
commercial center. (Sources. La Quima General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Site Survey)
D. Would the project disrupt or divide the physical arrangennerrt of an established
community (including a low-income or minority cominunity)?
No Impact. The project site does not contain any residential use and the immediate areas is partially
developed with commercial uses. The nearest residential uses are located approximately 1500 feet to the
southwest and are separated by Washington Street, a major arsenal. The proposed restaurant will not
disrupt or divide this community. Other residential areas are located to the north and south of the project
site. This proposal will not affect the physical arrangement of these neighborhoods (Sources: Site Survey,
Proposed Site Plan)
3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Regional Environmental Setting
Between 1980 and 1990, the population of La Quinta expanded 125%, as reported by the U. S. Census,
making it the second fastest growing city in the Coachella Valley. The number of city residents blossomed
from 4,992 to 11, 2I5. la Qumta's share of the entire valley population increased f 7om 3 T/e in 1990 to
5.1% in 1990. These figures are based upon information provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the State
Department of Finance, and the Coachella Valley Association of Goventments (CVAG).
The City's population as of January 1994 is estimated by the State Department of Finance to be 16, 634
persons. This is an increase of 208% in the last ten years. In addition to permanent residents, the City has
approximately 8,000 seasonal residents who spend three to six months in the City of La Quinta. It is
estimated that 30% of all housing units in La Quinta we used by seasonal residents. The average occupancy
is 2.5 persons per unit.
The housing stock as of 1993 is fisted at 7,755 single family units, 481 multi -family units, and 247 mobile
homes, for a total of 8,483 units.
Ethnicity information form the 1980 Census, for the area that is now the City of La Quinta, revealed that
80.81/6 of the La Quinta resident population as Caucasian, 14.71/6 as Hispanic, 2.3% as Afro-American,
1.1% as Asian, and .5% as Native American. The results of the 1990 Census show a mix of 70°/, Caucasian,
26% Hispanic, 1 61/6 Afro-American, I.5% Asian, and 1 0% Native American
The most current information available on employment of La Quin residents is from the 1990 Census. At
that time, almost 5r/. of the La Quinta work force worked at white collar jobs, while 43.3% were in blue
collar occupations Among those in white collar jobs, 16.4% were professional/technical positions, 13.3%
were in managerial positions, 14 00/9 were in clerical positions and 13 0°,'o were in sales. For blue collar
workers, 15.6% were in crafts, 4 1 % were machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors, 14.2% were in
service jobs, 3.80/6 were laborers, and 5.6% did farm work. Major employers in La Quinta include the La
Quinta Hotel Golf & Tennis Resort, PGA West, Vows, Simon Motors, City of La Quinta, Wal-Mart,
Albertson's, and Ralph's.
For planning purposes, the Southern California Association of Governments has projected employment,
housing, and population for cities that make up the SCAG region A key objective of SCAG's Growth
Management Plan is to achieve jobs/housing balance within each subregion that makes up the larger SCAG
planning area. The ideal jobs(housing balance ratio, according to SCAG is 1.27 jobs for every housing unit in
1984 and 1.22 in the year 2010 Jobs -rich (housing -poor) regions have ratios greater than the regional
average while housing -rich (job -poor) regions have ratios less than the regional average.
Local Environmental Setting
The project site is currently a vacant commercial pad- with no housing units located on site. The pad is
located approximately in the mid -portion of the commercial center The center is partially developed.
A Would the project cumulatively exceed official regional or local poptdation
projections?
No Impact- The proposed restaurant is expected to employ as many as 20 employees at full operation,
this will include full-time employees and pan -time employees The additional jobs will be beneficial in turns
of improving the overall jobs/hou_ang balance and the current levels of unemployment in the City. (Source.
SCAG Growth Management Plan)
B. Would the project induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly
(e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
No Impact As indicated previously, estimates indicate that a maximum of 20 persons would be employed
at the proposed restaurant. The proposal is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in the demand
for new housing in the urea-
C. Would the project displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
No Impact No existing residential units are located on the project site or in the immediate area No public
funds will be expended for this project that could otherwise be used to build housing. All financing of this
8
project is coming from private (non-public) sources. The proposed project would not result in the
displacement or removal of any exiling housing units. ($ounces: Site Survey: Proposed Site Plan)
3.3 EARTH RESOURCES
Regional Environmental Seining
The City of La Quinta has a relatively Bat topography, except for the hillside areas on the southern portion
of the City The City has elevations of 1,400 feet above mean sea level (nisi.) in the southern hillside area to
a low of approximately 30 feet above msl in the northeastern section Slopes on the valley areas of the City
are gentle, with ranging from 00/6 to 100%, while hillside areas on the south and southwest have slopes of
l0% or greater. The alluvial soils that make up most of the City are underlain by igneous -metamorphic rock
as seen in outcrops in the Santa Rosa Mountains and the Coral Reef Mountains. Sods on the valley Boor are
made up of very fine grain unconsolidated silty sands in most areas.
Local Environmental. Setting
The project area is generally urbanized. A review of historical aerial photographs indicates that the site has
not been developed until recently, when the commercial center development began. According to the
U.S.G S. La Quinta 7 I/2 minute quadrangle, the site's elevation is 60 feet msl. Local relief is minitnal,
although the site seems to slope gently to the northeast. There is an inferred fault located approximately
2000 feet north of the project site, however, there has been no recorded fauh activity, thus there is a low
probability for such activity The City of La Quinta lies in a se tsotically active region of Southern California.
Faults in the area include the San Andreas fault located several miles to the north, and two inferred faults
transeaing the southern section of the City.
A. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismicity: fault
rapture?
Less Than Significant ImpacL There are three inferred faults located within the City of la Quinta. These
local faults are considered potentially active, although no activity has been recorded for the last 10,000
years. A major earthquake along arry of these faults would be capable of generating seismic hazards and
strong groundshaking effects in La Quinta. Norte of the faults in La Quima have been placed in an Alquist-
Niolo Special Studies Zone. Thus, no fault rupture hazard is present on site. (Source Riverside County
Comprehensive General Plan, City of La Quinta General Plan, City of La Quinta Master Environmental
Assessment)
B. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismic ground
shaking?
Las Thin Significant Impact The proposed restaurant site will be subject to groundshaking hazards
from regional and local earthquake events. The proposed project will bring people to the site who will be
subject to hazards associated with groundshaking. The Riverside Courrty, Comprehensive General Plan
indicates that the project site is within Groundshalong Zone IV. The proposed structure will be constructed
pursuant to current seismic standards to reduce the risk of structural collapse (i.e., Uniform Building Code,
etc.).
C. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismicity:
round failure or liquefaction?
Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project is not anticipated to be subject to ground failure
hazards from earthquake or other events. The La Quinta General Plan indicates that the project site is not
within an identified liquefaction hazard area. The majority of the City has a very low liquefaction
susceptibility due to the fact that ground water levels are generally at least 100 feet below the surface in
these areas.
D Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving seismicity: seiche
or tsunami or volcanic hazard?
No Impact. The City is located inland from the Pacific Ocean and would not be subjected to a tsunami
Lake Cahuilla, a man-made reservoir located in the southeast section of the city (four miles from the project
site), might experience some high wave activity as a result of an earthquake and grounshaking. However, the
lake is not anticipated to affect the City of La Quinta in the evert of a levee faihrre or seiche. There is nor
anticipated hazard from the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel (VAinewater River Channel)
E Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving landslides or
modslidea'
No Impact The terrain within the project is level and no hazards associated with landslides will impact the
project area. (Source U.S.G.S. La Quinta 7 12 minute quadrangle, Site Survey)
F. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving erosion, changes
in topography or unstable sod conditions from excavation, grading or fill'
No Impact. The soils and geotechnical investigations of the site showed that the site is underlain by alluvial
deposits of Pleistocene age. The soils on site consist of Coachella fine Sandy loam (CsA), Coachella fine
Sand (CpA), and Myoma fine Sand (MaD) Th CsA soil is moderately alkaline and slightly calcareous, with
a few scattered freshwater shells in association. CpA soil is found on alluvial fans and in flood plains.
Freshwater shells are sometimes found in the soil profile for CpA MaD sod is found on dunes and alluvial
fans. Concha shells and oyster shell fragments are commonly fowl in this soil profile. For all three soils
runoff is medium to slow, and erosion hazard is slight. These soils have a moderate to high blows" hazard.
Water capacity ranges between 3.5 to IS inches. All of these sod types ate suitable for the development of
the proposed restaurant project.
The proposed development will maintain the existing topography. No hazards associated with changes in
topography and unstable soil conditions are expected from development on site. Compliance with the
recommendations of geotechnical studies will ensure the structural integnty of development on the site.
(Sources. U.S. D.A. Soil Conservation Service)
G. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving subsidence of the
land?
No Impact The site is not located in an area which is considered to have subsidence hazards, according to
the La Quinta Master Errvvonmemal Assessment. Thus, no subsidence hazards to the restaurant are
expected. Sol surveys undertaken on adjacent parcels indicated that, while standard engineering procedures
should be followed, there does not appear to be any risk of subsidence associated with future developmem
of the site. (Sources: La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment, Riverside County Comprehensive
General Plan)
H. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving expansive soils'
No Impact The underlying sods on the site do not have a high potential for expansion. Thus, construction
Of the project is not expected to be subject to expansive soils. The City requires compliance with the
Uniform Budding Code and the recommendations of a soils investigation report prior to approval of the
building permit. (Sources: USDA Report and General Soils Map for the Coachella Valley)
10
Would the project result in or espore people to potential impacts invohring unique geologic
or physical ratumsy
No Impact. The Coral Reef Mountains and the Santa Rosa Mountains represent unique geologic features
in the La Quinta Area. These unique geologic and physical features are not located on or rear the project
site and will not be affected by the proposed project. (Sources: U.S.G.S. La Quinta Quadrangle. Proposed
Site Plan)
3.4 WATER
Regional Environmental,%% g
Groundwater resources in the La Quinta area consist of a system of large aquifers ( porous layers of rock
material) and groundwater basins separated by bedrock or layers of soil that trap or retain groundwater. La
Quinta is located above the Coachella Valley Groundwater basin which is the major supply of water for the
potable water needs of the City as well as a significant supply for the City's nonpotable water irrigation
needs. Water is pumped from the under -ground aquifer via thirteen wells in the City operated and
adm nistered by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). La Quima is located primarily in the lower
Thermal Subarea of the groundwater basin. The Thermal subarea is separated into the upper and lower
valley sub -basins near Point Happy, located southwest of the intersection of State highway I I 1 and
Washington Street, opposite the proposed project site. CVWD estimates that approximately 19.4 million
acre feet of water is stored within the Thermal subarea which is available for use. Water pumped from the
aquifer is treated to federal drinking water standards and distributed to users through the existing potable
water distribution system. Water is also pumped for irrigation purposes to water golf courses and the
remaining agricultural uses in the City. Water supplies arc augmented with surface water from the Colorado
River transported via the Coachella Canal
The quality of water in the La Quinta area is highly suitable for domestic purposes. However, chemicals
associated with agricultural production in nearby areas and the use of septic tanks in the Cove area affect
groundwater quality in the area. Groundwater is of marginal to poor quality at depths of less than 200 feet.
Below 200 feet, water quality is generally good and water at depths of 400 to 600 feet is considered
excellent.
Percolation from the tributaries of the Whitewater River flowing into La Quinta from the Santa Rosa
Mountains provide a natural source of groundwater replenishment Artificial recharging of groundwater will
be a requirement in the near future.
Surface water in La Quinta is comprised of Colorado River water supplied via the Coachella Canal and
stored in Lake Cahuilla, lakes in private developments which ate comprised of canal water and/or untreated
ground water; and the Whitewater River and it's tributaries- The watersheds in La Quinta are subject to
intense storms of short duration which result in substantial runoff The steep gradient of the Santa Rosa
Mountains accelerates the runoff Bowing in the intermittent streams that drain the mountain watersheds.
One of the primary sources of surface water pollution it erosion and sedimentation from development
construction and operation activities. Without controls total dissolved solids (TDS) can increase
significantly from the development activities The Clean Water Act requires all communities to conform to
standards regulating the quality of water discharged into streams, including stormwater runoff The National
Polhrtant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) has been implemented as a two-part permitting process,
for which the City of La Quinta is participating in completing permitting requirements.
11
irT!ItM
The project site does not have any standing surface water on or near it. The nearest stand of surface water
is Lake Cahuilla, located several miles to the southeast of the project site. The Coachella Valley Stormwater
-channel is located approximately 200 feet north of the project site, but is dry except during seasonal storms
The City has limited areas which are subject to storm water flow or flooding. Flood prone areas within the
City are designated with a specific zoning district (Watercourse, Watershed and Conservation Areas. W-
1).The intent of the zoning district is to allow development in flood prone areas based upon the submittal of
a drainage and stormwater control plan. The City also implements flood hazard regulations for development
within flood prone areas
A. Would the project result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface ruooT
Las Than Significant Impact The proposed site plan for the project indicates that almost all of the
facility will be paved, except for landscaped areas. This pavement will prevent ground absorption and result
in additional storm runoff volumes from the site. The site does not serve as a recharge basin for groundwater
resources. Storm water will be directed north to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel located behind
the project site.
B. Would the project result in exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as
flooding?
Las Than Significant Impact The site is within the X designated flood hazard area. The X zone includes
those areas that are outside the 500-year flood plain. The project site is also outside of the 100-year flood
plain. The site is protected by the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. An all-weather bridge on
Washington Street spans the flood channel (Source: La Quima Master Environmental Assessment)
C. Would [be project result in discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water
quality (e.g. ttmperaturn dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
Las Theo Significant Impact. Runoff on site will be directed into the Coachella Valley Stormwater
Channel. There are no bodies of surface water on or adjacent to the project site.
D. Would the project result in changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?
No Impact Although an increase in runoff volume will occur, this increase is not expected to be a
sig ificam amount of surface water The size of the project represents a very small portion of the drainage
tributary area for the City.
E. Would the project result in changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
No Impact The City of La Quirt does not have any substantial bodies of water or rivers. The Coachella
Valley Stormwater Channel is located north of the project site and will handle runoff water from the project
and surrounding areas. The Coachella Valley Water District maintains this regional facility.
F. Would the project result in changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or wkirdrawal, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or by excavations?
12
No Impact. Water supply in the City is derived from groundwater's and supplementary water brought in
from the Colorado River. The anticipated water consumption will not substantially change the amount of
groundwater pumped from local wells.
G. Would the project resuh in altered direction or rate of lbw of groundwater?
No Impact The car wash will have no groundwater wells on site and excavation during construction will
not be deep or widespread enough to intercept local aquifers. The water consumption anticipated from the
proposed project is not expected to require substantial pumping of groundwater resources. Thus, no
alteration in the direction or rate of flow of groundwater resources is expected (Sources: Proposed Site
Plan)
tL Would the project result in impacts to groundwater quality?
No Impact. The project site will be paved and ground absorption on site will be reduced. The storm nmoff
on site will be discharged into a city storm drain that will be directed to the Coachella Valley Stormwater
Channel. A substantial portion of the proposed project site will be paved. Crankcase oil, hydrocarbons, and
other particulate and liquid contaminates may be deposited on the parking lot pavement from the parked
vehicles. Following a heavy rain, these materials could be transported into the nearby storm channel_
3.5 AIR QUALITY
Regional Environmensal.Seeing
The Coachella Vafley, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD), is in the SEDAB which has a distinctly different air pollution problem than the South Coast Air
Basin (SCAB) The SEDAB is not classified as an extreme non -attainment area for ozone and therefore, the
District has not changed the significance thresholds for the Coachella Valley from the 1987 version of the
SCAQMD Handbook. A discussion of the jurisdictional organization and requirements is found in the La
Quinta Maser Environmental Assessment (1992)_
The air quality in the Southern California region has historically been poor due to the topography,
climatological influences. and urbanization State and Federal clean air standards established by California
Air Resources Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are often exceeded. The South Coast
Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is a regional agency charged with the regulation of pollutant
emissions and the maintenance of local air quality standards. The SCAQMD samples air quality at over 32
monitoring stations in and around the Basin According to the 1989 South Coast Air Quality Management
Plan, the Southeast Desert Air Basin portion of the SCAQMD experiences poor air quality, but to a lesser
extent than the South Coast Basin. Currently, the Southeast Desert ,Air Basin does not meet federal
standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter. In the Coachella Valley, the standards for PM-
I0 is frequently exceeded PM-10 is particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter that becomes
suspended in the air due to winds, grading activity on construction sites and by vehicles driving on unpaved
roads, among other causes.
Local Environrnenial Sewng
The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, which has an and climate, characterized by hot
summers, mild winters, infrequent and low annual rainfall, and low humidity. Variations in rainfall,
temperatures, and localized winds occur throughout the valley due to the presence of the surrounding
mountains. Air Quality conditions are closely tied to the prevailing meteorology of the region.
The City of La Quinta is subject to the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), a plan which
describes measures designed to bring the SCAB into compliance with federal and state air quality standards
and to meet California Clean Air Act requirements. The General Plan for the City of La Quinta contains an
13
Air Quality Element outlining mitigation measures as requited by the Regional Air Quality Management
Plan.
The City is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 30, which includes two air quality monitoring
stations, one located in the City of Palm Springs and one in the City of Indio. The Indio station monitors
-conditions which are most representative of the La Quints area and has been collecting data for ozone and
particulate since 1983. The Palm Springs station monitors carbon monoxide in addition to ozone and
particulates and has been in operation since 1985.
A. Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected
air quality violation-'
Less Than Significant Impact. There are no significant pollutants anticipated to result from the operation
of the restaurant use. There will be some pollutants as a result of vehicular traffic from patrons of the
restauraru. The building will contain 5,040 square feet of space. Table 6.2 of the South Coast Air Quality
Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that potentially significant threshold for air
quality impacts for a restaurant is set at 20,000 square feet or more of space. The proposed restaurant is well
under this threshold.
Thus, there are no potential adverse air quality impacts of a significant level as a result of this project.
B. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
No Impact- Sensitive Receptor Land Uses include schools, day care cemers, parks and recreation areas,
medical facilities, rest homes, and other land uses that include concentrations of individuals recognized as
exhibiting particular sensitivity to air pollution. There are no sensitive receptor land uses adjacent or nearby
the project site. Thus, there is no impact regarding this issue. ( Source: La Quima General Plan)
C. Would the project &her air movements, moisture, or temperatum or cause any change in
climate?
No ImpacL The proposed project will feature one structure. The total height of the building will be 18
feet The pad will be covered by the building and the pedestrian walkway. The proposed structure is not
large enough to create changes in air movements, moisture or temperature (Source Proposed Site Plan)
D. Would the project create objectionable odors'.
No Impact The proposed project will not be involved in activities which may create objectionable odors,
such as waste hauling or the production of chemical products. Vehicles traveling on State Highway I I 1
generate gaseous and particular emissions that have odors and that may be noticeable on the project site
(Sources Site Survey, Proposed Site Plan)
3.6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
Regional Environnrrenasl Soling
La Quinta is a desert community of over 16,000 permanent residents. The City is 31.18 square miles in size,
with substantial room for development. The existing circulation system serves development in four general
areas, primarily single-family detached residential uses north of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel,
golf course and gated single-family, residential communities in the vicinity of the La Quima Hotel, a mix of
medium density single-family detached uses and office and retail uses in the Cove and Vdlage areas; and a
mix of anached and detached single-family and golf course uses in PGA West, located south of Avenue 54.
14
The La Quada roadway system consists of State Highway 111, which runs east -west and divides the cav
north -south, major, primary and secondary arterial streets as well as a system of local and collector street
Key roadways in the City include State Highway 1 11, Washington Street, Jefferson Sheet, Fred Waring
Street, and Eisenhower Drive
Traffic volumes in La Quinta experience considerable seasonal variation, with the late -winter, early -spring
months representing the peak tourist season and highest traffic volume periods. High traffic volumes and
out -dated geometries contribute to the relatively high incidence of automobile accident at the intersection of
Washington Street and State Highway 111.
Existing transit service in La Quinta is limited to three regional fixed -route bus routes operated by Suniline
Transit Agency. One route along Washington Street connects the Cove and Village areas with the
community of Palm Desert to the west of the City. Two lines operate along State Highway I 1 I serving trips
between La Quinta and other communities in the Coachella Valley
There are some existing pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian facilities in La Quinta, however, these systems are
to be developed as the city grows.
Local Enrironmemal Setting
The proposed project is located east of the intersection of State Highway I 1 1 and Washington Street and
west of Adams Street. Parcels along State Highway I I I consist of developed and undeveloped land. An
auto dealership is located to the southeast. Immediately to the south, there are vacant parcels; farther south
there is residential development To the west of the project site, is Washington Street' farther southwest is
the Point Happy ranch, a historic point in the City, and residential development. Adjacent to the north is
the Coachella Valley Stommwater Charnel (Whitewater Rive).
In previous studies of potential traffic and circulation impacts, various segments of Washington Street were
forecasted to carry extremely high volumes of traffic in the future. It was estimated that over 55,000 vehicles
per day would travel on Washington Street south of 1-10 Freeway It was determined that if these projected
increased were to occur. Washington Street would require a minimum of six lames of travel and intensive
Transportation System Management (TSM) applications to provide an acceptable level of service. The
Washington StreeUHighway I I I intersection is projected to be most severely and immediately impacted by
increases in traffic
A. Would the project result in increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is forecasted to generate a daily average two-way
traffic volume of 500 trips. The AVM_ Generated Peak Hour Total trips is 10, and the P.M. Generated Peak
Hour Total is 150 trips. The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) prepared a Regional
Arterial Program (RAP) in response to the Riverside County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) which
serves as the mitigation program for the Washington Street and Highway 1 1 I intersection. The Regional
Arterial Program studied the worst case build -out scenario for the area around the intersection. Other traffic
studies have been prepared for more intense projects proposed for the car wash project site. In these cases,
mitigation for traffic impacts was contained in the RAP. The proposed restaurant is a less intense land use,
thus there will be less adverse impacts that previous projects for this site which were to be satisfactorily
mitigated by the requirement of the RAP. Mitigation for the restaurant will be satisfied by the RAP
requirements.
B Would the project result in hazards to safety from design features (e g. sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible rises (eg. farm equipment)?
15
No Impact. The proposed restaurant will not include any new roadways or any modification to wasting
roadways
�. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
No Impact. The proposed project will not obstruct emergency access to surrounding land uses. (Source:
Project Site Plan)
D. Would the project result in insufficient parking capacity au -site or off -site?
No Impact. Parking needs for this project were determined by staff, with 50 spaces needed for parking
E. Would the project route in hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Las Than Sigmirtcaol Impact The entire length of Washington Street, within the City of La Quinta, is a
designated bicycle corridor. The north bank of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel (Whitewater
River) is also a designated bikeway corridor The south side of the intersection of Washington Street and
State Highway I I l has a designated pedestrian crosswalk controlled by traffic signalization. Currently, the
number of pedestri uts and bicyclists in the immediate area appears to be moderate Occasionally, bicyclists
are observed crossing the highway along Washington street going north. The greatest potential for
pedestrian/bicycle accidents will involve traffic on Washington Street. (Source. Site Survey)
F. Would the project result in conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
No Impact Bike racks will be provided by T. D.C., the master developer, when additional developmem
occurs in the center.
G. Would the project result in rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
No Impact. There are no railroad tracks, navigable rivers or waterways, or air travel lanes within the City
of La Quints, thus, there will be no adverse impacts. (Source U.S G S La Quinta Quadrangle. Site
Survey)
3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Regional Environrnenral.Setting
The City of La Quinta lies within the Colorado Desert. Two ecosystems are found within the City, the
Sonoran Desert Scrub and the Desert Transition. The disturbed environments within the City are classified
as urban and agricultural. A discussion of these ecosystems is found in the La Quinta Master Environmental
Assessment (1992).
Local Environrnenral Setting
The project site is located in the Sonoran Desert Scrub ecosystem. Typically undeveloped land within this
ecosystem is rich in biological resources and habitat. The Sonoran Desert Scrub ecosystem is the most
typical environment in the Coachella Valley. It is generally categorized as containing plants which have the
ability to economize water uses, go dormant during periods of drought, or both. Cacti are very common in
16
these areas due to their ability to store water. Other plants root deeply and draw upon water from
considerable depths. The major variations of desen vegetation result from differences in the avadawity of
water. The most dense and lush vegetation in the desert is found where groundwater is most plentiful.
Dominant plants include:
Creosote bush
(Larrea tridentate)
Bur -sage
(Ambrosia dumosa)
Ocotillo
(Fouquieria splendens)
Barrel Cactus
(Ferocactus acanthodes)
Jumping cholla
(Opuntia bigelovii)
Smoke -tree
(Dales spinosa)
Mesquite
(Prosopis glandulosa)
Four -wing sahbush
(Atriplex canescens)
Agave
(Agave desert)
Desert lavender
(Hyptis emoryi)
The Sonoran Scrub areas are considered habitat for a number of small mammals. These animals escape the
summer heat through their nocturnal and/or burrowing tendencies. Squirrels, mice and rats are all common
rodent species in the Sonoran Desert. The black -tailed hare is a typical mammal. Predator species include
kit fox, coyote, and mountain lion in the higher elevations. The largest marrmhal species found in this area is
the Peninsular Big Hom Sheep which is found at the higher elevations of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountain ranges. Birds and amtptubianstreptiles can also be found in the Sonoran Scrub area.
The project pad site is vacant, and was disturbed by grading activities that were part of the commercial
center development. There is sparse vegetation extant on the project site.
The La Qumta Master Environmental Assessment indicates that the property is located within the biological
habitats of the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard and the Coachella Giant Sand Treader Cricket. These
wildlife species are listed as either endangered or threatened.
The Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard has been listed as endangered by the California Fish and Game
Commission and a threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service since 1980 The species is highly adapted
to loose, windblown sand and is able to rapidly run over the sand. The mapped description of the lizard's
habitat includes the sand dunes north of Avenue 50. To mitigate the loss of the lizard's habitat due to
development, there is a development fee which is used to acquire and maintain habitat areas in a Habitat
Conservation Preserve near Thousand Palms. The City of La Quinta participates in this fee program as
mitigation for habitat loss. The project applicant has paid the mitigation fee.
There is no existing mitigation fee or program for the Sand Treader Cricket. This species is considered
endangered to extremely endangered and is therefore a Species of Special Concern for the California
Department of Fish and Game. it is a Category 2 Candidate for Federal listing, meaning that existing
information indicates the species may warrant listing, but substantial biological information to support the
ruling is lacking_ The rocket is commonly found on the wind-swept sand dune ridges, although habitat
includes areas where springs have kept the sand damp. These crickets have been observed in the northeast
portion of the City. No special studies have been done in this area, and as noted previously, the site has been
disturbed.
A. Would the project resuh in impacts to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds'
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The project site is within the designated habitat of the Coachella
Valley Fringe Toed Lizard. However, the mitigation fee has been paid.
17
IL Would the project result in impacb to locally designated species (eg. heritage trees)?
No Impact There are no locally designated biological resources within the City of La Quinta All
significant biological resources are designated by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S
Fish and Wildlife Service. (Sources: La Quinta MEA_ Site Survey)
C. Would the project result in impacts to locally designated natural communities (eg, oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc)?
No Impact There are no locally designated natural communities found on or near the project site. The
surrounding parcels are developed with structures or roadways. The project site has been disturbed in the
recent past, due to construction of the commercial center, thus there are no existing biological resources of
local significance on the property (Source La Quinta MEA, She Survey)
D. Would the project result in impacts to wetland habitat (eg. marsh, riparian, and vernal
Pam)?
No Impact There are no wetlands, marshes, riparian communities, or vernal pools on the proposed project
site or nearby. Thus, there is no impact to these issue areas. (Source_ La Quince MEA, Site Survey)
E. Would the project result in impacts to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
No Impact The immediate area to the east and west of the proposed project site is developed with
commercial buildings and a parking lot to the immediate south. There are no known wildlife corridors
within this project area. (Source: La Quinta MEA)
3.8 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Regwnul Env rvr ntal.Sdting
The City of La Quinta contains both areas of insignificant and significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Areas
(SMARA), as designated by the State Department of Conservation. There are no known oil resources in the
City. Major energy resources used in the City come from the energy sources of the Imperial Irrigation
District, the Southern California Gas Company, and gasoline companies.
Local Environmenial Setting
There are no oil wells or other fuel or energy producing resources on the proposed project site. While the
pad site is undeveloped, it is not a source of soil or gravel resources due to its limited size. The property is
located within MRZ-I, a designation for those areas where adequate information indicates that no significant
mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.
A. \Would the project conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
No lmpact The City of La Quinta does not have an adopted energy plan However, the City does have a
Transportation Demand Management ordinance in place that focuses on the conservation of fuel. The
proposed restaurant will be required to meet Title 24 energy requirements in its construction No other
mitigation is required for this issue.
18
B. Would the project use nos -re ea able resources in a wasteful and inefficient ntauaW.
Less Then Significant Impact. Natural resources that may be used by this project include air, minerak
water, sand and gravel, timber, energy, and other resources needed for construction The size of the
proposed restaurant indicates that resources needed for construction are not going to be significant.
Operation of the project will increase the demand for energy but the restaurant is not expected to consume
energy or resources in a wasteful manner. Lighting for security will be minirnal The project will be required
to comply with Title 24 requirements related to energy conservation. Any landscaping will also be required
to comply with the landscape water conservation ordinance requirements as well as requirements of the
Coachella Valley Water District.
3.9 RISK OF UPSETMUMAN HEALTH
Regional Environmuual ,Serong
Recent growth pressure has dramatically increased the City's exposure to hazardous materials. Such
exposure to toxic materials can occur through the air, in drinking water, in food, in drugs and cosmetics, and
in the work place. Although large scale, hazardous waste generating employment is not located in La
Quints the existence of chemicals utilized in dry cleaning operations, agricultural operations, restaurant
kitchen cleaning, landscape irrigation and exposure to large scale electrical facilities may pose significant
threats to various sectors of the population. Currently, there are no hazardous disposal waste sites located in
Riverside County, although transportation of such materials out of and around La Quinta takes place.
Local Environmental &Wng
In order to comply with AB 2948, "Hazardous Waste: Management Plans and Facility Siting Procedures-,
the City of La Quinta adopted Ordinance 184 consisting of a Hazardous Waste Management Plan
The project site has not been used for manufacturing uses in the pas However, the site is located near a
major arterial and a state highway, both impacted by frequent high traffic volumes.
A. Would the project involve a risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)'
Less The Significant Impact. Detergents and cleaners will be used in the maintenance of the restaurant
The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable OSHA and EPA regulations, as well as those of
the Riverside County Health Department.
B. Would the project involve possible interference with an emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation Plan?
Less Than Significant Impact. Construction activities will be confined to the site and on site operations
will not interfere with emergency responses to the site or surrounding areas riot will it obstruct emergency
evacuation of the area. (Source: Proposed Site Plan)
C. Would the project involve the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards!
Less Than Significant Impact- The proposed project shall comply with health and safety regulations for
work place conditions, including training personnel in safety procedures. Potential hazards will be reduced if
these regulations are followed.
D. Would the project involve exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards!
19
No Impact. There are no existing health hazards on site. The proposed restaurant is not expected to
create arty health hazard. The project will be required to conform to zoning standards, and all applicable
health and safety codes. (Sources: Site Survey)
3.10 NOISE
Regional Environmenlal &stung
Noise levels in the City of La Quinta are created by a variety of sources in and near the City The major
sources include vehicular noise on City streets and Highway 111, and temporary construction noise The
ambient noise levels are dominated by vehicular noise along the highway and major arterials in the City.
Local Envwonnnenral Selling
The ambient noise level at the proposed project site is dominated by vehicle traffic noise from State Highway
llL
Residential areas are considered noise -sensitive land uses, especially during the nighttime hours. The nearest
residential use to the project site is approximately 1750 feet southwest, across Washington Street. This is the
location of the Point Happy Ranch, on which there are several houses. Other residential areas near the
project site are located approximately 3,500 feet south of the project (Lake La Quinta), and approximately
2,400 feet north (Into Homes) across the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. These residential areas are
distant enough from the project that there is no anticipated impact due to noise.
A. Would the project result in increases in existing noise kveb?
Less Than Significant Impact The increase in vehicle noise at the surrounding street system is not
expected to create airy discernible increase in the existing noise levels. Mechanical equipment will be
enclosed so that any operational noise detectable outside of the building should be reduced to insignificant
levels
Staff has determined that the proposed project is most compatible with Retail Commercial, Theaters, and
Restaurant land uses. as provided for in Table 6.3 - The Land Use Community Noise Equivalent Levels
(CNEL) table in the LaQuinta MEA indicates that retail commercial, theaters, and restaurant land uses can
have a noise level of up to 75 CNEL value. Up to 65 CNEL is clearly acceptable and up to 75 CNEL is
normally acceptable. In order for the to have a less than significant noise impact, the operational noise levels
will not be able to exceed 75 CNEL Construction materials and structural design must take noise
containment and reduction into account for this project.
B. Would the project result in exposure of people to severe noise levels?
No Impact The La Quinta General Plan regulates excessive noise and vibration in the City by establishing
allowable noise levels for various land uses Conmrercial areas should have a maximum exterior noise levels
of up to 75 CNEL from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. If the ambient noise level is higher than these standards, then it
will serve as the standard.
The proposed project may result in short-term noise impacts associated with construction activities. During
construction, heavy machinery will be capable of generating periodic peak noise levels ranging from 70 to 95
dBA at a distance of 50 feet from the source. No impacts will be created because all activities will be inside
the proposed building. (Source: La Quima General Platt)
20
III PUBLIC SERVICES
Regional EnvironmentalSerang
Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contract with the Riverside County Sheriff
Department The Sheriff Department extends service to the City from existing facilities located in the City of
Indio. The Sheriff Department utilizes a planning standard of 1.5 deputies/ 1,000 population to forecast
additional public safety personnel requirements in the City at buildout. Based on this standard, the City is
currently underserved.
Fire protection service is provided in the City by Riverside County Fire Department The Fire Department
administers two stations in the City, Station #32 on Avenue 52 west of Washington Street, and Station #70
at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54 The Fire Department is also responsible for building
and business inspections, plan review and construction inspections. Based upon a planning standard of one
paid firemen/ 1,000 population, the City is currently under -served. The Fine Department has indicated that a
need exists for a third fire station in the northern part of the City between Washington Street and Jefferson
Street. However, no time period has been set for the construction of this new facility.
Structural fires and fires from other mart -made features are the most significant fire threats to the City.
Hillside and brush fires are minimal as the hillside areas are barren and scattered brush on the valley floor is
too sparse to pose a serious fire hazard.
Desert Sands Unified School District and the Coachella Valley Unified School District serve the City of La
Quinta. There is one elementary school, one junior high school, and one high school within the City The
City is also within the College of the Desert Community College District.
Library services in La Quinta are provided by the Riverside County Library System with a branch library
located in the Village area of the City. The existing facility opened in 1988 and contains 2,065 square feet
of space and approximately 18.000 volumes The County utilizes unadopted planning standards of 0 5
square The per capita and 1 2 volumes per capita to forecast future facility requirements to serve the City.
Utilizing this standard, in 1992- the City was urderserved in space but overserved in terms of volumes
Health care services are provided in the City through JFK Memorial Hospital in Indio and the Eisenhower
Immediate Care Facility located in the Plaza La Quinta Shopping Cemer. The Eisenhower Immediate Care
Facility is a satellite clinic of Eisenhower Medical Center, located in Rancho Mirage. The Riverside County
Health Department administers a variety of health programs for area residents and is located in Indio
Paramedic service is provided to the City by Springs Ambulance Service.
Local Environmental Setting
The nearest fire station to the project site is Station 432 located approximately 3 miles south. Govermrrrntal
services in La Quinta are provided by city staff at the Civic Center and by other county, state, and federal
agency offices in the desert area.
The project is serviced by Adams -Truman Elementary School, La Quinta Middle School, and La Quinta
High School.
A. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services in relation to fire protection'
Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will increase fire protection requirements due to the
construction of a building on the vacant pad. The project must comply with fire flow and fire safety building
standards of the Riverside County Fire Code to prevent fire hazards on -site and to minimize the need for fire
21
protection services. Fire flows of 1250 gpm at 20 psi for 2 hours will be needed. unobstructed fire access
will also be needed to facilitate Fire Department response. Other code requirements (such as emergency
exits, alarm and sprinkler systems, construction materials, etc.) will be required. A supervised waterflow fire
alarm system as required by the Uniform Building CodelRiverside County Fire Department and National Fire
Protection Association Standard 71 will be required. (Source, Riverside County Fire Department)
B. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in relation to police protection'
Less Than Significant lmpacL The Riverside County Sheriffs Department was given the opportunity to
review and comment on the proposed project. It is not anticipated that there will be any significant adverse
impact upon police protection services from the proposed restaurant.
C. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in relation to school services?
Less Then Significant Impact The 5,040 square foot restaurant is expected to have approximately 15 to
20 employees. Indirect student generation due to increased demand for housing in the area is estimated to
generate 57 students (at 0.0001145013 student per square foot). School impact fees will reduce potential
impacts to the Desert Sands Unified School District. (Source: Desert Sands Unified School District)
D. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in relation to the maintenance of public facilities, including roads'
Less Then Significant Impact The project site is conerttly served by Basting infrastructure, including
public roadways such as Washington Street, Adams Street, and State Flighway I 1 I. The proposed project
will not require new or altered government services for the maintenance of roadways and other public
facilities. (Source: Site Survey, Proposed Site Plan)
E. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in relation to other governmental services'
Less Then Significant Impact Building, engineering, and planning services needed for the project will
be offset by permit fees charged to the project applicant The restaurant will generate revenue for the City
which will be used to pay the costs of governmental and City services mewed. (Source Project application
information)
3.12 UTILITIES
Regional Eevirommental Sewing
The City of La Quinta is served by the Imperial Irrigation District (®) for power supply and the Southern
California Gas Company (SC-) for natural gas service. Existing power and gas fines and substations are
found throughout the City. IID has four substations in La Quints, with electricity generated by a steam plant
in El Centro and hydro electric power generated by the All American Canal. General Telephone Exchange
(GTE) provides telephone services in the City. Colony Cablevision serves the City of La Quints with cable
television service.
The Coachella Valley Water District (CV WD) provides water service to the City. C V WD obtains its water
from underground aquifers and from the Colorado River. CVWD operates a water system with potable
22
water pumped from 13 wells located throughout the City. The wells range in depth from 500 to 900 feet.
Potable water is stored in five reservoirs located in the City- There is an existing well directly behind the
project pad site. Sanitary sewage is also collected and treated by the CVWD.
The City's stormwater drainage system is administered by the CV WD, which maintains and operates a
comprehensive system to collect and transport flows through the City.
The City of La Quints is served by Waste Management of the Desert for solid waste disposal. Non-
hazardous , mixed municipal solid waste is transported to three landfills within the Coachella Valley
Local Environmemd.SeWng
There are natural gas lines located along the south side of State Highway 1 I I. A sanitary sewer force main
is located along the west side of Washington Street. A water trunk line runs along Washington Street, west
of the project site. Storm water nmoff from the project site is directed north to the Coachella Valley
Stormwater Channel (Whitewater River) (Source: La Quinta General Plan)
A. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to power and
gas services?
Less Theo Significant Impact. Power and gas lines were brought to the project site when the commercial
center was developed. The proposed development will require electric power services. Consumption factors
are not known at this time. It is not anticipated that the project will require a significant level of electricity or
natural gas to result in the need for new systems or aherations to existing systems. The project applicant will
have to coordinate with IID and SCG for the timely provisions of power and natural gas services
B. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to
communication systems?
Less Than Significant Impact The project will require telephone services from GTE. Coordination with
GTE will prevent any impact on communication systems. (Source: Proposed Site Plan)
C. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to local or
regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
Less Then Significant Impact The proposed project will require water services. It is not anticipated that
there will be a significant adverse impact upon the water resources or water system in the City Water lines
exist within the commercial center and will be readily accessible to the applicant for this project
D. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to sewer
services or septic tanks?
Less Then Significant Impart The proposed restaurant will generate sewage which will have to be
processed by the C V WD sewage treatment facility. Sewer lines were brought in to the commercial center
when it was developed, and will be available for the restaurant (Source: Application Materials)
E. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to storm water
drainage?
Less Then Significant Impact The project site is currently vacant with paved parking. The development
of the restaurant building will lead to the paving of the site. Thus, stormwater runoff will to be directed into
the existing storm drain, which is the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, located north of the project
site. Due to the relatively small size of the project site in comparison to the drainage tributary area of the
#]
storm drain system in the arm the runoff volume from the site is not expected to represent a significant
amount of the runoff handled try existing drain- (Source: Proposed Site Plan)
F. Would the project result is a need for new systems, or substantial altermtioe to solid Waste
disposal?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will require solid waste disposal services from
Waste Management of the Desert. Solid waste from the site may be transported to the existing landfills in
the Coachella Valley. The project nnut comply with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling policies. On
site programs will tweed to be coordinated with Waste Management, and the commercial center
management
3.13 AESTHETICS
Regional Environmental.%ming
The City of la Quinta is partially located within a desert valley cove, with hillsides on the west and south.
Views of the desert and surrounding mountains are visible on clear days throughout most of the City.
Local Environrreenral ,Suring
The project site is located in a commercial corridor along State Highway I 1 I Existing commercial
structures in the corridor cannot exceed 50 feet in height. Most commercial buildings nearby have neutral,
soft -toned desert colors, with wall -mounted identification sign below roof -lines or monument signs close to
the ground Views from the site include the San Bernardino Mountains to the far north, the Santa Rosa and
Coral Reef Mountain to the south, and the cove residential development also to the southwest.
A. Would the project affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
Less Than Significant Impact- State Highway I I I and Washington Street are designated as Primary
image Corridors on the La Quinta General Plan. The La Quinta MEA indicates that the project site is within
Distinctive Viewshed No. 3 with high sensitivity for impact. Distinctive viewsheds are identified through
their close proximity (within 2 miles) to elevational high points and exhibit a high visual sensitivity. View
Point k3 is located north of the Coachella Valley Stonnwater Channel, the 90 degree viewshed of attractive
views and 270 degree viewshed of common views creates a combined low level of visual sensitivity. The
immediate surroundings of the project site include both developed parcels and vacant parcels. Thus, the
vista has already been impacted by previous development.
State Highway I I I is a designated scenic highway The zoning designation for the commercial corridor
along the highway is Scenic Commercial (CPS) This designation requires an enhanced architectural standard
for development, and an enhanced landscaping standard.
B. Would the project have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
I.ess Than Significant impact While building plans have not been finalized, the proposed restaurant will
be designed as a one -component structure with architectural design compatible to the existing buildings in
the center The Spanish -Mediterranean style is prominent in the desert areas and is considered aesthetically
pleasing (Source: Proposed Site Plan)
C. Would the project create light or glare?
Less Than Significant Impact The proposed restaurant will be open for lunch and dinner. Exterior lights
will be provided. Illuminated signage for the facility is proposed. There will be exterior security fighting
24
recessed under the pedestrian arcade in the from of the building. AO fighting will be required to comply with
the Dark Sky Ordinance that requires shielding and downrcaued lighting of low-level wattage. No adverse
impacts are anticipated from the proposed lighting and signage requests. (Source: Proposed Site Plan)
3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Regional Entvronmeetal Setting
The history of the City of La Quinta extends back to an era when much of the Coachella Valley was
inundated by ancient Lake Cahuilla. Early inhabitants of the Colorado Desert were people who had
migrated across the Bering Strait more than 20,000 years ago- As their migration progressed, they passed
through the Colorado Desert on their way to Central America where the Inca and Mayan civilizations were
founded
As time passed, the Coachella Valley became the home of a band of people that have come to be known as
the Cahuilla Indians. The Calu ilia followed a hunting and gathering life style as they lived along the ancient
lakeshore and cove areas in the Valley The archaeological record, as it is known today, extends back almost
6.000 years.
The Cahuilla were divided into three geographic areas of the Valley: Western or Pass Cahuilla within Agua
Caliente (Palm Spring area), Desert Cahuilla (from Palm Springs east to the Salton Sea), and the Mountain
Cahuilla (south of San Jacinto Peak in the Santa Rosa Mountains). Travel across boundaries to exploit
seasonal resources for ceremonial purposes was a part of their annual cycle. Alfred Kroeber estimated that
the original population (2500 individuals) had been reduced to about 750 by 1923.
The most likely locations of prehistoric cultural resources in La Quiets are along the foot of the Santa Rosa
and Coral Reef Mountains. However, with recent development in the northern portion of the City, a number
of archaeological sites have been located with subsurface deposits being found at depths of 10 to 13 feet.
These resources are likely associated with the availability of water and food resources. Temporary campsites
can be found near game trails, springs, mesquite groves, grass stands, bedrock outcrops near food or water
resources, marshy areas, or along the ancient lake shore Isolated milling features, sparse lithic scatters, and
isolated pottery scatters can be found almost anywhere in the City.
In 1540, the fast European explorer, Captain Hernando de Alarcon, entered Southern California at the
Yuma crossing, which is located to the southeast of La Quinta. Approximately 100 years later, Spanish
missionaries visited the area. A trail was established by the Cocomaricopa Indians across the Valley in 1821
as they carried mail through the San Gorgonio Pass between Tucson and Mission San Gabriel.
White settlement in the Valley did not occur to any degree until the transcontinental railroad was
constructed. The construction of the railroad brought with it the technology to drill water wells deep enough
to sustain settlement in the Valley- The Bradshaw Road brought in settlers and freight both before and after
the construction of the railroad. The Coachella Valley was the site of the roost popular immigration route to
the Southwest via the Southern Immigrant Trail. The Bradshaw Trail route passed through the Valley until
1915 when a graded gravel road was developed for automobile travel -
The settling of the La Quinta has been chronicled by the La Quinta Historical Society in several
publications. There are 13 historical structures and sites recorded on the California Historic Resources
Inventory. These resources are listed in the La Quinta General Plan.
La Quinta experienced rapid growth in the late 1970's which lead to incorporation of the City of La Quinta
in 1982. The City has grown from a population of approximately 5,400 in 1982 to over 16,000 in 1994 The
41
incorporated boundaries of the City presemly include over 31 square miles of lard. The City has a recently
formed Historic Preservation Commisisioo, the purview of which includes c Runt! and historical resources
Local Envuvnrnental.Setting
The project site is located near the most prominent intersection on the City To the southwest of the
intersection of Washington Street and Highway I 11, is a designated historic structure, Point Happy Ranch
The ranch includes an old California style house, with a guest house and a workers village that date circa
1930. The ranch was a Deglet Noor date farm that became known for improving methods of pollinating
dates Prehistoric sites are also reported on the ranch.
Prehistoric archaeological sites are numerous within a two-mile radius of the project site The project site
has been subjected to rough grading when the commercial center was irnitally developed. Archaeological
resources were located during the development of the center The appropriate mitigation was afforded those
resources. However, it is possible that additional subsurface cultural deposits could exist. There is no
existing evidence of any archaeological resources on the pad site. However, there could be subsurface
cultural deposits
A. Would the project disturb paleontological resources?
Less Theo Significant Impact. No significant paleontological resources have been found in the near
vicinity of the project site. The project site is not located within an area that is considered to have a high
sensitivity for paleontological resources and no paleontological resources are expected to be present on site
(Source. Site Survey, La Quints MEA)
B. Would the project disturb archaeological resources?
Less Then Significant Impact. There are numerous recorded archaeological sites within a one and two
mile radius of the project site It is possible that there are subsurface cultural deposits on the property. The
property has been previously surveyed for surface indications of cultural deposits and a report filed with the
Eastern Information Center at the University of California at Riverside ( Report J! 2201). No sites were
recorded during this survey However, a large recorded archaeological site (Cal-Riv-150) is located near the
project site.
The monitoring of all earth -disturbing activities and trenching, including off -site improvements, will be
required due to the project's location relative to recorded archaeological sites in the very near vicinity. The
monitoring shall be done by a professional archaeologist acceptable to the Community Development
Department, following accepted professional standards and the policies of the City of La Quinta.
C. Would the project affect historical resources?
No Impact The project site is vacant and does riot contain any historical structures- Thus, the construction
of the proposed project will not affect historical resources in the City (Source: La Quinta General Plan)
D. Would the project have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
No Impact The project site does not represent an ethnic cultural value and development of the proposed
restaurant will not affect any ethnic cultural value. (Source: Site Survey, La Quinta MEA)
E. Would the project restrict existing religious or sacred ruses within the potential impact area?
No Impact. There are no religious uses or sacred uses on the site which may be affected by the proposed
restauram. There are no churches within 500 feet of the proposed site. (Source: Site Survey)
26
3.15 RECREATION
Environmental Setting
The City of La Quinta has an adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan that assesses the existing resources
and facilities and the future needs of the City. The City contains approximately 28 7 acres of developed
parkland for Qui
mby Act purposes. The 845 0 acre regional Lake Cahuilla County Park is not included in this count. There
are also bike paths within the City and designated pedestrian hiking trails.
Lord Enwvnmental Settng
The project site is vacant and does not provide recreational services or contain a recreational facility The
nearest park, Palm Royale Park, is just less than a rmle northeast of the project site. The La Quinta High
School is located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Adams Sued and Westward Ho Drive,
northeast of the project site. Recreation opportunities are made available to the public at the high school. In
addition, the La Quinta Golf School is located north of the high school This is a privately -owned facility
open to the public.
A. Would the project increase the demand for neighborhood or regional pants or other
recreational facilities?
No Impact. The construction and operation of the Shangri La restaurant will result in a rtwdmum of
20 employees on site. These employees are not expected to utilize parks in the area to a level that results in
arty detectable adverse impact. (Source: Application Materials)
B. Would the project affect existing recreational opportunities?
No Impact. The proposed restaurant will not replace nor provide a recreational opportunity in the City.
The operation of the facility will have no effect on the existing or future recreational opportunities on La
Quinta. (Source: Application Materials, Proposed Site Plan)
SECTION 4: MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Initial Study for the proposed restaurant indicates that the project will not have potential significant
adverse impacts on the environmental issues addressed in the checklist Some of the issue areas could have a
potential significant impact if appropriate mitigation measures are not implemented. These issue areas
include. Traffic and circulation, biology, cultural resources, earth, and air quality The following findings
can be made regarding the mandatory findings of significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA
Guidelines and based on the results of this environmental assessment:
The proposed restaurant will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, with the implementation of mitigation measures.
The proposed restaurant will not have the potential to achieve short term goals
to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, with the successful
implementation of mitigation.
The proposed restaurant will not have impacts which are individually limited
27
but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed
development in the immediate vicinity.
The proposed restaurant will not have environmental effects that will adversely
affect human, either directly or indirectly, with the implementation of mitigation.
SECTION 5: EARLIER ANALYSES
A. Earlier Analyses Used. On January 19, 1990, the staff of the City of La Quinta Planning
Department prepared an Initial Study (EA 89-150) for the then proposed One Eleven La Quinta Center
(Specific Plan 89-014 and Plot Plan 90434). This documem took imo consideration all of the environmental
issues on the Environmental Checklist Form, in compliance with CEQA. This Enviommemal Assessment is
available for review in the Community Development Department of the City of La Quinta.
B. Impacts Adequately Addressed. All of the effects identified in the Shangri La EA were within
the scope of EA 89-I50_ These issues were adequately analyzed by the earlier document. EA 89-150 was
certified by the City Council in 1990.
C. Mitigation Measures. There is only one effect that is identified as "potentially significant unless
mitigated" in the Shangn La EA, and that is Biological Resources. Question 3.7.a asks whether endangered,
threatened, or rare species or their habitats would be impacts. The Master Environmental Assessment for the
City of La Quinta identifies the project area as within the habitats of the Coachella Gam Sand Treader
Cricket and the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard. The previous documem identified the lizard, but not
the rocket. Mitigation for the lizard was included in the Conditions of Approval of the One Eleven La
Quinta Center. The required mitigation fee has been paid by the ratter developer, thus, the applicant for the
restaurant will not be required to pay this fee. Currently, there is no required mitigation for the Coachella
Giant Sand Treader Cricket
28
0
Y
� o
W
� �
r
z
�
rP
r�
M,
o�x
�ro
00
zz
z�
c�
z
n
a
ro
�x0
Cl'1
d
LLL...
i=l
d
0n
r" y Pn
o�ro
do
A
(D W
vo
13
< I
m o
w
w
o
w
�
'5y
z
N
7
►7
CCCy""
y
-rD
C
.,
o
z
a
z
x
Vic,
C�t
yy
L
�7
'n
.Z
.d
Op
zz
O 0,
z
n
z
c�
n
a
xo
d�
�m
d
a
rs
u
0
cr
w
n
= N o
o
(D Z
N
<
(D g
a <
r�
= Z
a o
D
a
N
= p
0 =
o
t O
N =
rt
a
a
E3 o
��+'7
c�
o
<" n
m =
o
w o
= r
z
o
rt o
ID
3 n o
J
m v
In Q
�
77
.0
00
=z
lD F
zz
NrA
O \ rD
o
2
•
z
C)
n
� o
a =
N N
rD
N Z i
c a
o�
n
a
_
a
0
z
a
�
a
r
N
xo
p.
cp.
ao
d
a
rD -0 n
rD a c
J D
mrD
ry
Ds a J
<
Gi
�
p.
H
l a
n
a
o
..
..
O
N
a
r
r D
D o
z
rD
co -o
0
l<
l<
J
O
D
rD
(D N
n
D
^
n
o
J
a J
a
�
n �
a
y
rD
C
n
o T
0
rD n
rD
O 'd
z°z
N
o
CD
`°
r
zM
c)
Z N J
L N
nc o
.a z
rD O
z
�o
0
2�
3
ci
T �
� fJ
C
rD
iV
rD n
i
lTl
� z
�F
a
N
o�
xo
v�
to
tTi
0
a
r�
0
8
o
W
Z
>
rD
fA
z
`°
a
O
z
o�z
�b
00
zz
z rrn
n
z
n
m
a
xo
o�
0
a
w
H
O S J (D
'S a O
C
�y
O (D d (D
r
�
a •S
O J p
N
1�
"O
'O
N
D
O (D (D
v O a
J N
O <
d
a
(D (D
(D
N /�
aooc
N
••
`�
a (rD
O a ..
d
nr
g 7
z
0 •n0
Z O Z
c c D
N O (D
�
�1
d o
K(D C
a
W
S (D
n (D
J
fD -S -O W
a (D d
O
Z N
l< m
J N d
rD
O O E Z
J Z N
N
(D crt S
fD
(l S
N
C
J
(n Q v
o
O
O
(OD
i
00
�.o(D`n
�z +a
zz
CL
a
o
o a,
z�
0
?o
a �
N
rD (•r �
rD
N i i
• C a
J 3
n
zo
a
0
n
0
z
n
fi
a
(D
o
N
xo
o�
v
a
J-+• O N D::-
C O
w
J
x
jN
�.
J
C t0 J O
J fD
.O
Y�
rD
0 (D
morcuro
n
d�
N
O
n w
o z
j
�•-o
`<
0 n 3
N
c
c m
rr <
c
w n m
z n
w +
c j
n
�
n
�+ n
o m
ow
ro c
a
0
-s a
77
M+
M EM
c
DO
.�
ZZ
w
0 .y.
rD
r
l<
2
z
n
n D�-
O
w �
N N
N •S 'S
• c w
r
n n
Cr
o �n
�
w
a
n
.CD
n
o
z
.�
w
a
0
N
�1
WO
v
o
Z
�
W
a
A
An+�y
o
z
z�
z
IV
�ro
Op
zz
_y
r
zm
0
z
c�
a
m
a
rxn �
°z
� rnn
d
a
c�
o
Z
o
W
�
oe
O
rD
O
y
S
rr
►fir
o
o�z
�ro
Op
zz
�W
rrn
c�
z
0
n
a
m
a
xo
�ro
v�
� rnn
0
a
m
o
w
2
00
oz
n
Ln
O�
OO
zz
r
zm
n
c�
m
a
xo
tz
C7
a
O
P
O
0 0 0
y
ao
f�
_
rD lC lG
rD
<
N
1[lrIJ
O tD
a O �.
0 3
7 J
Vi
C D_
N
••
• tY
O �•F J
N
�V
'z/
41
j
y�
r�
o
�• n
3
�'
S
m 0
m
o
m m
l<m
m
ct
m
0
o
T1
O
Op
a
?z
N
r] !A
a
O CO
�r
z
n
O O
-�
z�
a o
o Ln
"
z
c�
z n
m 0
su <<
rr
.j
o
3 N
a
""
a
m
xo
0
tz
0
a
0
Q
o
w
z_
ay
rD
o
a
Z
K
O�
Op
zz
y�
O� CD
z
n
3
z
c�
n
-�
m
a
p.
op.
tzrn
0
a
§
k
(Dƒ
`
7
§
k
\§
[
/\
\
\\
\
2
\
m
§
3
�§
»�
00
32
2m
0
0 CD
rD
z
:
S
0
R
MrD
r
§
\�
2�
�
<]
a
�
o
W
�
o
0
--
N
�7
z
O
n
x
O�
.b
00
z
.. z
cm_
�r
m
z
n
z
c�
-�
m
xo
�ro
C�
tv
G
a
0
Y
o
w
0
3
ID
..
W
�
�
z
ID
C)
>�
a
y
071
O�
Oro
00
zz
oIt
c�
z
n
a
xo
C
da
z
M
d
a
�.
W
CD
J -o n a 0
• t't (D rY
rD I
co rr n m j
w
a
A
.0 n rD
a S cD Z rD
J= rD a s J
rD 0
rD O
O rt
rD
C
• O e'F O a fD
fD
C•1
4,
O J n J j= <
O O
O
rD c N J a 0
J c
J
0
0. jP'F S N fT
•O rD
Q
O << N c•'
Z rD N 3
rD Z
_0
O a
rD
O
O n =" O a N
ac
Z
J O
O
<
-0 < o •rD
•m
-s
0
rD� = w
r+
O
n (f] rD C
a O X rD -S
N
(D
o rDN a O M
5 n o a
i�
a=rD rD D
tf D < D
(D
m �
rD o
n rD rD O
.n
z c
�
�.
rD
rD
O0
o
�zz
<
CA
oo0
O
z
�n
z
n co
�l
= a
�n n
a3
z
�'D' C�
N
�T
n
�
rD
rD
n
�
X
WO
V
tz
ai
V
a
o
w
z
CD
A
C�
°z
n
z
o�z
�ro
00
zz
z�
n
z
c�
n
a
xo
�ro
°z
� ran
d
a
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
PLOT PLAN 94-545 (SHANGRI-LA ORIENTAL RESTAURANT)
JANUARY 31, 1995
1. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community.
2. The Plot Plan, as conditioned, is consistent with the zoning requirements and intent of
the C-P-S Zone and Specific Plan 89-014.
3. That the environmental impacts associated with the development of this project can be
mitigated through the requirements of EA 94-290 and the approval conditions imposed
upon it.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:
1. The development of this site shall be generally be in conformance with the exhibits
contained in the file for Plot Plan 94-545, unless otherwise amended by the following
conditions.
2. The approved plot plan shall be used within one year of the Planning Commission
approval date. Otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever.
"Be used" means the beginning of substantial construction which is allowed by this
approval, not including grading, which is begun within the one year period and thereafter
diligently pursued to completion.
3. All applicable conditions of SP 89-014 and Parcel Map 25865 shall be complied with as
necessary.
4. An exterior lighting plan for the parldng lot area and building shall be approved by the
Planning and Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Lighting
fixtures shall match existing fixtures and shall be shielded to eliminate glare on the
adjacent streets and surrounding areas.
5. Separate recycling facilities shall be provided within a masonry enclosure in conjunction
with the applicant's normal trash service needs pursuant to the California Solid Waste
Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991 (AB 1327).
6. That all conditions of the Coachella Valley Water District shall be met as required.
7. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City adopted
infrastructure fee program in affect at the time of issuance of a future building permit.
8. Construction shall comply with all local and State building code requirements in effect
at the time of issuance of a building permit.
CONAPRVL.092 1
CmSi of Apprt
PP 9 w (Sbmltl a PswwU
Ivry 31, IW5
9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and building permit for construction of any building
or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances
from the following public agencies:
o City Fire Marshal
o City of La Quinta Public Works Department
o Community Development Department
o Coachella Valley Water District
o Desert Sands Unified School District
o Imperial Irrigation District
o Riverside County Health Department
o South Coast Air Quality Management District
Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be
presented to the Building and Safety Department at the time of application for any permit
for any use contemplated by this approval.
10. All refuse enclosures shall be large enough to hold standard size trash bins and shall
comply with City and Waste Management of the Desert design requirements. These
requirements include but are not limited to decorative masonry wall, solid metal doors,
and a concrete pad in front of the enclosure.
11. All required facilities shall be accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities
Act (A.D.A.) of 1990.
12. A sign program for the building shall comply with the adopted sign program for the
Center unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission.
13. All exterior colors shall match those utilized within the shopping center.
FIRE MARSHAL REQUIREMENTS:
14. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2,000 gpm for a two
hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure which must be available before any
combustible material is placed on the job site.
15. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" X 4" X 2-1/2"),
located not less than 25-feet nor more than 165-feet from any portion of the building(s)
as measured along approved vehicular travelways.
16. Install a Hood Duct Automatic Fire Extinguishing system. System plans must be
submitted, along with a plan check/inspection fee, to the Fire Department for review.
CONAPRVL.092 2
Cmdi�m of Appo�
PP 9 W (stop U H 111 )
Ivry 31. LM
17. Conditions subject to change with adoption of new codes, ordinances, laws, or when
. building permits are not obtained within twelve months.
18. Install panic hardware exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code.
19. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2AIOBC
in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
20. Install Knox Lock Boxes, Models 4400, 3200 or 1300, mounted per recommended
standard of the Knox Company. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval of mounting location/position and operating standards. Special forms are
available from this office for the ordering of the Key Lock Boxes. This form must be
authorized and signed by this office for the correctly coded system to be purchased.
21. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed. A plan check fee
must be paid to the Fire Department at the time building plans are submitted.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
22. The applicant shall submit site civil, landscaping, and irrigation plans to the Engineering
Department for review and shall pay the costs of plan checking. The applicant shall not
begin construction activity until the plans have been approved by the City Engineer.
23. Site grading and off -site improvements adjacent to the site shall conform to the approved
improvement plans prepared pursuant to Specific Plan 89-014.
24. All storm water and nuisance water run-off produced on this site shall be discharged in
accordance with the approved drainage plan prepared for Specific Plan 89-014 unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
25. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall
submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with
Chapter 6.10, La Quinta Municipal Code. In accordance with said Chapter, the applicant
shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, in an amount sufficient to
guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit.
26. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall obtain
an encroachment permit from the Engineering Department. During construction of the
site improvements, the applicant shall comply with all provisions of the permit.
CONAPRVL.092 3
Cmdi dAp,m
Sorry 31, IWS
27. The applicant shall employ or retain California registered civil engineers, geotechnical
engineers, or surveyors, as appropriate, who will provide, or have his or her agents
provide, sufficient supervision and verification of the construction to insure that all work
site work complies with the approved plans, specifications and applicable codes. The
engineer or surveyor monitoring grading shall provide a certification that the finish
building pad elevation conforms with the approved grading plan.
28. The applicant shall pay all fees charged by the City for processing, plan checking, and
permits. The fee amounts shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is
undertaken and accomplished by the City.
PECIAL:
29. The required State Department of Fish and Game fees of $1,328.00 shall be paid to the
Planning and Development Department (check made out to the County of Riverside)
within 24-hours after review of the case by the City Council.
30. If on -site trenching is planned to occur four feet below the existing pad grade, a
professional archaeologist shall be present to monitor the construction activities of the
developer.
CONAPRVL.092 4