Loading...
PCRES 1996-019PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 96-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-313 PREPARED FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96- 024 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-313 K5L RECREATION AND LAND CORP. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, Califorrlia~, did on the 28th day of May, 1996, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 96-313, Conditional Use Permit 96-024, and Adjustment to wall height from four-feel: to six-feet; and, WHEREAS, said Public Hearing had been previously continued from March 12th, March 26th and April 9th, to allow time for the applicant to complete an acoustical analysis; and, WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Dl;partment has prepared an Initial Study (EA 96-313); and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said Use Permit and Adjustment will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: The proposed Use Permit and Adjustment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly, in that no significant impacts have been identified, and less than significant or potentially significant impacts can be addressed by the incorporated mitigation measures. 2. The proposed Use Permit and Adjustment does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal communit}~, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples ofthe major periods of California history or prehistory, due to the lack: of any such factors existing on or near the existing facility. resopc.176 Planning Commission Resolution 96-019 The proposed Use Permit and Adjustment do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, with implementation of the monitoring program. 4. The proposed Use Permit and Adjustment will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. The area is established infill subdivision, with infrastructure to support such development already in place. 5. The proposed Use Permit and Adjustment will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. NOW, T[-IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: That the recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 96-313 for the reasons set. forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 28th day of May, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NEWKIItK, BARROWS, TYLER AND CHAIRMAN ABELS NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONER BUTLER ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS ANDERSON~AND GARDNER ~ ABELS, Chairman of a Quinta, California ATTEST: Community Development Director California resopc.176