Loading...
PCRES 1997-032PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 97-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 97-339 PREPARED FOR AMENDMENT #2 TO SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 97-605 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 97-339 EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN, INC. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 10"' day of June, 1997, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 97-339, Amendment #2 to Specific Plan 87-011 and Site Development Permit 97-605; and, WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of "The - Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" las amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 97-339); and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said applications will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Site Development Permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly, in that no significant impacts have been identified, and less than significant or potentially significant impacts can be addressed by the incorporated mitigation measures and standard City development requirements. 2. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Site Development Permit will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the project in question will not be developed in any manner inconsistent with the General earesopa339 Planningi Commission Resolutions 97-032 Plan and other current City standards, will not significantly impact any wildlife characteristics of the area, and will not eliminate any significant cultural resources. Project mitigation has been added to the proposal which will address the potential impacts as identified and discussed in the Initial Study. 3. The proposed Specific Plan and related applications do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, with implementation of the monitoring program, as the proposed project will not significantly alter the types or intensity of the commercial uses already contemplated in the General Plan. Impact mitigation has been developed and applied which will address overall project air quality emissions associated with the entire Washington Square specific plan area; in combination with project traffic monitoring of the specific plan over the course of its development, overall impacts associated with the Eagle Hardware project due to traffic and air quality have been addressed on a quantitative and qualitative basis. 4. The proposed Specific Plan and related applications will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, in that the proposed project, whether approved or not, is a consistent representation of the project type to be proposed for the site as long as the current General Plan land use and zoning designations are applicable, and to the extent that the impacts as identified in the Initial Study will remain similar. 5. The proposed Specific Plan and related applications will not have environment effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, as the project contemplates uses similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Washington Square specific plan, and which were addressed in the EIR previously certified for the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: That the recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby recommend to the City Council certification of Environmental Assessment 97-339 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. euicwpa339 Plamiine Coirunis-sion Res-olulion 97-032 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 10`h day of June, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Gardner, Newkirk, Seaton, Tyler, Woodward and Chairman Abels. NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ~.<. 1UE,8 ABELS, Chairman of L/a Quinta, California ATTEST: JERF~Y ~iERMANJ Community Development Director Cit of La Quinta, California